The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2019-05-14 . - ,--,` • , � � � , . , . i `- . ��-� �� r , CITY OF PALM DESERT ' � ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION � . �'�•. � � M I N UTES � � . � • � � � MAY 14,.2019 � , , , - � � �, - I. CALL TO ORDER � � � . __ ,, . The meeting was�called to order at 12:30 p.m. � . , � , . II: R�LL CALL - . Commissioners , Current Meeting Year to Date � Present Absent Present Absent . Chris Van Vliet, Chair X � 9 . � Karel Lambell, Vice Chair X 9 � Allan Levin X 9 . Michael McAuliffe� � �` � X 9 � � t . Jim Mclntosh X . - 7 2 Jim Schmid � ( ' X . 4 �� 1 _ _ , - ' John Vuksic � � X 8 - 1 , Also Present � � �Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner � Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner , . Janine Judy, Recording Secretary , � � . , . , III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS � � .. � None . . - . , � IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 23, 2019 Action: � � Commissioner Le'vin moved to approve the April 23, 2019 meeting minutes with minor changes. Motion was seconded by�Commissioner Lambell and carried �. by a 6-0-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, Mclntosh, Schmid, Van Vliet voting YES and Vuksic absent. , � � ,` . , , � __,r � � � . � ARCHITECTURA�L RE�:�:��W COMMISSION . \�� ` .� � , MINUTES Ma 14 2019 ' ; � v , �- V. CAS E S: �� - \ , .. A. Final�Drawings: , � , 1. CASE NO: S�4RC 19-0003 � � , APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: RESIDENCE INN, 38-305 Cook Street, , Palm Desert, CA 92260 . . � _ ' NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL .SOUGHT: Consideration of a - sign design review for a request to construct two (2) monument si ns � ._. . , g for the respective hotels; Courtyard and Residence Inn Marriott. , LOCATI�ON: SWC Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive , ZO N E: P.R.-5 � Mr. Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner, reminded the Commission that this � proposal for two (2) free=standing m�onument signs along Frank Sinatra . Drive(Frank Sinatra) and Cook Street (Cook) came before them on April . 9, 2019. The Co�mmission continued the project to allow the applicant to , , submit a cohesive package which includes a plan and design for the � existing monument signs along Frank Sinatra. One sign, identified as _� Sign A, will be for the Courtyard by Marri�ott (Courtyard) and is located ' � along Fran�k Sinatra. This sign will replace an existin monument si n g g � used for both the Residence Inn by Marriott (Residence Inn) and � � Courtyard. Sign B is proposed along Cook for the Residence Inn. Staff's , recommendation on Sign B would be to reduce the width of the cabinet , � � and adjust proportions of the profile. Both signs feature a similar . contemporary style.with offset rectangular forms to vary the massing of . � the sign cabinets. Both signs are 4'-6"tall, constructed from .080"gauge � � aluminum, features� �/2" push-through �acrylic letters,,�and are painted �. gray and black. Both signs will be placed within an existing landscaped . area. The proposed signs conform with�all City standards and staff n recommends approval with recommended changes. � ; . � �. The Commission reviewed and discussed the chan es. Commissioner � g Schmid agreed with staff's recommendation of slimming the widest part �� of Sign B as it presently�looks. chunky. , - . � � . G:\PlanningWanineJudyWRC\1Minutes�2019\190514min.do�X Page 2 of 9 ' . ` . . , ' � , � \ � . /r �4 '� ARCHITECTURAL�RE��.��:'V COMM�ISSIO�N - � `--�� MINUTES � � May 14, 2019 � Action: � � Commissioner Levin moved to approve subject to reducing width of cabinet and �adjusting proportions of si�gn profile. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Schmid,and carried by a 6-0--1 vote, with Lambell, Levin, � McAuliffe, Mclntosh, Schmid, and Van Vl�iet voting YES and Vuksic absent. . � 2. = CASE NO: SARC 19-0011 � APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: TNT�ELECTRIC SIGN CO. 3080 E. 29t" � � Street, Long Beach, CA 90806 � � � NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a � �� request to establish a comprehensive sign program for: Jensen's. � LOCATION: 73547 Highway 111 � . , , . . �-� ZONE: D.O. � ., . C�ommissioner McAuliffe recused himself from this project and left the conference room. � � ,! . -� � Mr. Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner, presented a comprehensive sign , program fo�r the Jens,en's center on Highway 111. Currently there is no � sign program for the center and a lot of what they will review today was � shown on the preliminar.y elevations that was previously approved. This � sign program will encompass 16�walls signs for all respective suites . � - � and three (3) monument signs. The maximum area allowed per sign is . � . consistent wit,h what is allowed by code. This sign program does specify � � additional design standards to ensure that� all the signs are of a consistent construction. He went through the site plan and pointed out the locations of each wall sign, as well as the three�(3) monument signs. � � � All the wall signs will front on either the private parking area or public right-of-way as required by code. All tenant signage will be limited to � through- and halo-lit channel letters flush mounted to the building fascia _ with the exception of signage for Suite� G4; this tenant will have the � � option of having channel letters mounted onto an aluminum backer � panel. Mr. Melloni said�Sign A is located at the primary entrance to the property on .Highway 111 and will replace the existing 12' tall non-conforming monu�ment with a new 7' tall monument in the�same location. The sign � �, features five (5) sign panels, four (4) of which are designed as tan � � colored aluminum cabinets with white routed-out copy and will feature ._: � . wood�siding and colors consistent with the updated fa�ade de�sign. Sign �� > G:\Planning\Janine JudyWRC\1 Minutes�2019\190514min.do�X Pag e 3.of 9 . ° � • - , - l ARCHITECTURAL RE��-�-�W COMMISSION � �--��t � 1; MINUTES Ma 14 2019 ; Y � , . 1 . B is a directional monument sign 6' tail and 3'-8" wide located near the � corner of Larkspur Lane (Larkspur) and EI Paseo. It features a desi n . . . , . , �, . . .g . , � similar to Sign A as it uses identical colors, materials and similar � � proportions and is intended to directtraffictothe sho s on the north end� p of the property. Sign C is a directional monument sign Iocated on the� southern entrance to the property on EI Paseo and is� identical to Sign � B in form and function. �_ , � � Mr. Melloni said the primary monument si n, Si n A, is attract�ivel g g y � designed and incorporates materials and colors used on.the building - farade for compatibility. Staffi recommends approval of this new monument si�gn with a condition that�all sign copy will be white letterin . � . , g �Staff is concerned about the scale and�location of Signs B and C and recommends they be reduced to a pedestrian app�ropriate scale. At their current height of 6', the two (2) signs are out of scale with the pedestrian-oriented EI � Paseo shopping district. Additionally, staff recommends that Sign C along EI ��Paseo be located further back from the sidewalk area. Staff recommends approval of the sign program with the aforementioned design modifications. � � The Commission and staff discussed existing signage in the center that � will remain after the fa�ade enhancement. They als,o discussed the � Jensen's wall sign and,MR. BILL L�ANG, Commerce Realty, explained � � that the same sign will come,down for the,farade enhancement but will � go back in the same location. � Commissioner L-ambell was concerned that the two (2);6'tall monument � _ signs on EI Paseo were too tall. She suggested they be at a lower level for the pedestrians on EI Paseo. M R. N E I L MCNAUG HT, TNT Electric Si:gn Company, said they could.reduce it to 41/2' to 5' for it to still serve �� its purpose. Commissioner Lambell also pointed out that the one.-si n , . . . . ; g on Larkspur appeared to be sitting in the bushe� and MR. LANG said � , , � they would keep it clear. � , � � �- - Chair Van V1iet aske.d if the primary�monument�sign needed to be 7' tall , � instead of 6' tall. He said the Commission typically asks for some architectural merit and holds the signage at 6' �tall. Commissioner � Mclntosh said the Commission will consider granting a variance be ond Y �the allowable zoning ordinance if it is architecturally significant. He likes - the wood siding but was concerned with its long term durability with the desert weather. Chair Van Vliet suggested they reduce the size of each � � panel to get the height down. MR. LANG said they are�going from a 12' � � sign to a 7' sign and explained how the names would start to squish if they were to reduce the panel sizes. He said they did have some other � . 1 _ , 1 G:\Planning\Janine Judy�ARC\1 Minutes�2019\190514min.docx � Pa,ge 4 Qf 9 � _ ` � . � � �� , , „ � � R HITE T RAL��RE1i��.��:v COMMISSION �� , � � A C C lJ MINUTES � � �� ; May 14, 2019 � . , . . � ideas but they are taller than 7'. Commissione�r Mclntosh said to bring their�� ideas forward and if they are architecturally significant the �' Commission will review them.� , _�' Mr. Melloni said through the sign program they are allowed some , � degree of flexibility but it is really dependent on the architectural merit. _ ; . . He suggested they continue this item to allow the applicant to come � - back wit�h a new design that is a little more varied and interesting. He � gave some exampl_es of signs that exceed the height along Highway , � � 111. � ' � . . . . , . Actio,n: � . � � � ' Commi;ssioner Lambell moved to continue subject to: 1) approval of sign program: 2)�monument sign on Highway 111 shall be redesigned to have more � � � architectural�merit; and 3) monument signs on EI Paseo and Larkspur shall be � reduced in height. Motion was sec,onded by Chair Van-Vliet and carried by a 5- l� � � 0-1-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin; Mclntosh, Schmid, and Van Vliet voting YES � and McAuliffe abstainin and Vuksic absent. � , . . g . � . � . _ � � 3: - CASE NO: MISC 19-0013 � � ; , . � ' l APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: RENEWABLE ENERGY PARTNERS . � , INC. 170 N. Maple Street, #105, Corona, CA 92880 � NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of three _ � (3) solar carports with battery system; Oasis S�DA Church. � . � � LOCATION: 74700 Country Club Drive . � � . ZONE: P.R.-4 �� . , , � ,, . � � Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, reminded the Commission that � this proposal for three (3) solar carports for the Oasis SDA Church carr�e , � before therr� on April 23, 2019 and was continued to allow the applicant � . � _� to submit accurate drawings and address drive aisle concerns. In the � . previlous renderings, the carports were shown right on the property line. � The applicant has now scaled them back to where the parking stalls � start, which leaves a 4' landscape buffer for setbacks and water drainage. Staff� spoke with .Fire and w�s informed the.y need 24' of � � � clearance. The previous renderings indicated t�hat the lowest point of the carports were 13'-6" up to 20'. The carports have now been reduced � � to 9' on the low side, and betwe.en 15'-1" and 17'-6" on the high side. � He p,resented the revised renderings in comparison to the previous � � , . � � . , , , , ' G:\Planning\Janine JudyWRC\1 Minutes�2019\190514min.docx Page 5 of 9 � . . � . r- ; - � i �� ARCHITECTURAL RE`�;►r��W COMMISSION -_ ��-{- � � � MINUTES � Ma � 14 2019 . v , � _, , . , renderings and said the design and slope rem�ains the same and staff is recommending approval. � � � , . � � � � Commissioner�Levin pointed out several inconsistencies in;the details and told the applicant that the dimensions didn't add u to the total on p � any one of the three (3) carports. He atso stated that the overall height , , of carport number two was not shown. He and MR. MARTIN FLORES, , REP Solar, reviewed and discussed the dimensions. Chair Van Vliet � asked if the inconsistencies were si�gnificant�enough not to a rove. pp � _. Commissioner Mclntosh said the numbers are within 2%. Chair Van Vliet� sai�d even though they have lowered th'e car orts�the still seem p Y ' too�tall. Mr. Swartz said they will work with the applicant to get the � � correct numbers. - , . � � � , - � � � ��The Commission wondered if the clearance forthe Fire De artment was , , p also incorrect. �MR. FLORES stated he was dropping off a set of plans to�� Fire afte.r the meeting .for� review. Commission�er Lambell was � ` � concerned that he was dropping off a�set with incorrect numbers. Sh`e � felt the design was ap.provable but all the numbers would need t'o�be .� reviewed. She said Building will bounce the plans back if �the don't . . � , . . Y match up. Commissioner McAuliffe told the applicant to make sure�that - the clearances are not necessarily from canopy to canopy because he doesn't know if th�ey have the clearances�based on the curb locations. �� Action: � � � � � . . � Commissioner Lambell moved to approve design as submitted. Motion was . seconded by Commissioner McAuliffe and carried� by a 5-0-1-1 vote, with , � Lambell, Levin, McA�uliffe, Schmid, and Van Vliet .voting YES and Mclntosh � � abstaining and Vuksic absent. � � ,. , � r . 1 1 4. CAS E N O:��M I S C 19-0004 ' � . ; , . � . , , APPLICANT ,AND ADDRESS: JOSE ESCAMILLA, P.O. Box 265, , �� Thousand Palms, CA 9�2276 � � . � � NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a � _, _. �, materials exception for a vinyl fence. � � � ` LOCATION: 7`4-540 Moss Rose Drive l I / ' � . ZO N E: P.R.-5 � - � . . Commissioner Schmid recused himself to the audience.- � , , r , , � , � � � , . � . � '� � G:\PlanningWanine Judy�ARC\1 Minutes�2019\190514min.docx Page 6 of 9 . � , ,� ' , . � . , � ' �� - . �—,� � � � . , ARCHITECTURAL RE��.��`N COMMISSION � � �� . M I N UTES , � . May 14, 2019 , � . . . � Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, presented a materials exception for a vinyl f�ence on Moss� Rose Drive�that was built in the front yard , without permits. The fence is.5' high and meets the setback of 15'. He , � presented several photos of the house, fence, and two gates that are 15' from curbo He pointed out that if this was a 5' high block wall, this � would meet code. � �l . , Commissioner Levin asked if the applicant went through Public Works �. � to cut the driveways. Mr. Swartz didn't #hink the �applicant submitted an encroachment permit on the, driveways because Planning would have to approve the site plan. He said he will check with Public Worksa , Chair Van Vliet asked what the Ci-ty.'s policy was�on having three (3) driveways. IVIr. Svvartz said typically the City wants as much�landscape � � in the front as possible. Commissioner Mclntosh asked what the language was regarding the percentage of landscape on street � � frontage. Mro Nick M�elloni, Assistant Planner, said the impermeable limit . is a maximum of 40% of the front yard; impermeable surfaces meaning . concrete. However, an except_ion is always possible through the � . Architecture Review Commission (ARC). �,, � . . The Commission reviewed the property on Google Earth. Commiss,ioner Mclntosh ,said if the rule has �a 40% maximum of hardscape along the street frontage, then the applicant should adhere to that. Commissioner Lambell agreed with the 40% rule, but the . Commission's task is to review the vinyl fence and setbacks. She said � staff needs to checkto see if the fence is tallerthan 5' and if it is it needs . to be pushed back or lowered. . � Mr. Swartz asked the Cornmission if the vinyl was appropriate in the � � . front yard and if not then the applicant�will have to remove the fence no mat#er the height. .He stated, there is no other vinyl on the street. � � Commissioner Mclntosh asked about the Fence Ordinance. Mr. Swartz said �anything facing a public street has to be de.corative block or wrought-iron. Vinyl, wood, or another material can be proposed, but it is � . . subject to ARC approval. There has to be some compelling reason to � grant a materials exception, for instance using a material that will blend � into the architecture of the home.or something that enhances the overall character of the neighborhood. Chair Van Vliet said he drove by the � house and said the fence doesn't enhance the neighborhood and it is �, � , the only fence that is pushed out that�far on the whole street. � . . � � , . . , G:\PlanningWani.neJudy�ARC\1Minutes�2019\190514min.docx Page 7 of 9 � � . , .. . .. . . . .. . .. f .. • .. . . .�.� . . � .. .� . .. . . .. . . .. , � . .. .. �� ARCHITEC.TURAL�RE��,��W.COMM�IS�S�I�ON . .. �.. . ....,.._ . .._:, . .... ... . . . . . .. .. .� .::�: ::�.�. . . . . .... . .. . .. . .. . .... . .... . . .. .. : . . MINUTES�:� ::�-:� � .. .. . . . ... � .. .. : . .. . .. .. . . .. . .. - .. . .. � . ::.. :.:�. May14, 2019::��:� � :� .::=: �:�.�. . ..: : ..�. . :� .::�: ::�.�. , .� .::�: ::�.��.��' :� .:.�. :: . . . ... . ..�.� �: :::. : . .... ... . . .... .... . . ... .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . ... . . .... ... . . ..�. .. .. : ,.:� �- ..�� : :.�� .. .. : . :� �� :. .. :�:�:� .. .. :�:�:� :. .. :�:�:� � � . .. . .. . . .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. . . .... ... . . .... ... . � . .. � �� .Mr.. Swartz��said i.f..the� C�rnmissi.on .d�n�ies��the� vinyl, :then��it�doesn't . . �� = � . .... . .... . .. : :. . .... � �� : :: �:�:�m�a�tter how close��the:fence is to:the�street. Commissione�r�Mclntosh felt�:� :.��:� . .... ... . . .... ::.... � g . .. . ..g ... . . . ... . .. . . . ... . , .... ._.. . . . . .::._ ::�� . . � . . . . .. .. � � � � .::.��.4�- t ere� wasn�t �a�� ood :reason��to�� rant� :an �xcept�ion. Com�missi�one�� : � � � � :: :::: :::::. �: .�_:�.�.:.::::: McA:uliffe:s:aid this is �furthe�::complicated:�b:�::the:fact that tf�e::a : :licant �� .. . ... .pp. . .. . . ... . .. . . . .... .. . .. .. . . . . ... . .. . . � � ��- � ..�:�as already i:nvested: in wrought=iron:�#:or the entry� gate:s and shou�ld..�:�:�:: � �� . .. . .. .. . � �� . . :� .::�:c:ontinue with� the::inrrought-iron� .or: :bfock and� not::intr�duce a thir.dl�: �:�.�. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. . .... . .... -- .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . ... .. : :.�- mate�rial; vuhichisvinyl�.� ..�� :�:::� � � .. :�:�:� :.� � ..�:� ... : . . ..::.�� ; . . -.::.�� . - . . . ..::.�� . ... . . . . . . . . .. .. . ... . .. . . . . . . .. .. . ... . .. . . . . . . .. .. .� .:: . :: :� .. .. : . :� � . ., .... . . .. . .. . .... � �� :�:� :�:� =.o:mmissioner :Mclntosh thought:::app�roving this :would� set a bad�:� :.��:� . .... ... . . . .... ... . . . . ... . .. . : . _ . . .... ... . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . .. .. � . .... ... . � rece en :�.. e s�aid if�this was:acce� table, the:n�it shoufd�be acc�e�ptable � �� : � � � � .. .. :�::�� ..�� :�::�� . p .. .. . , .. , . . . p . . . . ., . . . :. . . . .. . . .. . . �� : :.: ::. : �� or e�very .ouse on the�st�r.ee#:�and that woul�:.be�a disaster. �: ::�:. ::. � � �� . � �:� :.� ..�:�:�:� :. � ..�:�:�:: - : . . .:::.:: � � -- � � . . .:::.,: . ... . .. . . : . . �:::.:; . ... . .. . . : . . . .: :: . ... . .. �� . .. . . . >.. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. .. .. . .. . .: . .. .. . . . . : .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . .... ... . .. . � � � �� :� .::�: .� r:.Swartz re:comm�ended denial.of:the.vin 1.fence..:To::meet.code.,, the:�: �:�1�. . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . :: :.:� :.:.:� � :: :.:� :,:.:� applicant:can .use wrought=ir:on or block�-at.�th�e:=correct setback�:.a 15' �� ..�- :� .. . . . .. . . . . . .�. . � �� s:e�back�for�a:5'�high:wal�I��o�r�a�20�' setback for�a�6' high�wall.�� . . . ... . .. .�. . .� .::�: ::�.�. .. .... ... . , . .... ... . . :.:. ::. .: -: :.:. ::. : : . . .::: :: A�ct i an:�: : � . � .. . , . . .. . . : . . ..::.� � � . .. . . : : . ..::.�� . ... . .. . . : . . ..::.�� . ... . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. : : � . . .. . . . . .. . �� : :::. ::.Commissioner:. :Lambell moved. :::to deny. .Mo�io:n: was seco�i:ded: b �� =� ... : . . , . .. .. . . . . . . , .. ... - ... . .. . : . . . . . .. . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . y .� .::�: :: .. �� .. :�:�:� Comrrrissi:oner Levin. a�nd�:�c�arried by:..a 5�0=�-1 vote, :.with.�:Lambell, Levin�, ..�:�:�:� . . . .. .. . .. : �: :.:. ::. : � .. . .. .. . � � � �� . . . . .. ..cAuliffe.,��M.clntos:h,��and:�V�an. Vliet: voting :�YES.and..Sc�hmid��abstaini.ng..and:�� .�. . . . . . .... . . . . .... . .... .. .. : . :� . .. . .. � � ...; �� : :Vuksicabsent.�� : :.�� :. .. �� ... . . .. . .. . .... . .... . .. . . .. . . .. .. :�:� :.��: ,,5.�:: :�:�CASE NO: SAR�C:1�9-0010 :: :�.. . . :� .. .. . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . ., . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . : �� - - � �� APPLICANT AND AD�DRES:S:�SIGN-A-RAMA;:41-945 Boardwalk #L, -: :::. :: .. . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. : . . . . ... . .. . .. .. � � ��` � .. Pa:lm Desert,:CA..92211 �� . �� . . .. . .. . . .. . .. , . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . ..,.., ... . . .... .�.. . . .... ... . �: :.:. .. . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . .... . .... . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. � .. NATUR�E:�:OF PROJEC�/APPROVAL ��SOUGHT: Consideration to � . .... ... . . .... ... . . .. . . .. . . ... . .. . . . ... . .. . . . ... . .... ... .: : . .. ... .. �� approve�a�n�am�ndm.ent�to exis#in�g sign �p,rogram:for: Waring��Me-dica�l �.:.. � �� . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. . . . .. . .. . � ..,,.. . . . �� .. . .. . .. . : . . .. . . . . .. . -: :::. .: aza�. .. . .. .. . �: :�:� :.��: . .. . . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. . . . .. .. . . . �� - � � �� LOCATIO�N�:: 72650 Fred:War�in�g Drive #1.10B�:�. �� : :::. :: :� .. _. : . :� .. .. : . :� . .. .. :�:�:� . �.f�. :�-�.. : . :... . :..... .. .. . .. .. . .. � , .. . . .. . � .�: :.:. ::. : ��. :.��. .. . � � .�:� .::�:ZONE: P.C.-C�)��S:P:� . . . . .. .. . .... ... . . .... ... . . .. :::. :�:�: . ..,.... .. �� . . . .. . .. . .... ... . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . ... . .. . . . ... . .. . . � � - . . . : . �� Mr:-��Kevin��wartz�,.::As:so�ci�ate��Pl�anne:r.;� state��that�the`.appli�c�ant �has �.::.�� :: :: :::: ::::: :: ::::r:equested to�: pu:ll:::this item from: :th:e agenda�:and:::recommended::: :::�:� .. . . ... . . . . . . :. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. . � . . .. .. . .. . .. . . . ... . .. . . - continuin�g:ti�e item to a�late:r-�date. � �� - .. . . . . .. .. . . . . ... . .. . . . ... . .. . . . ... . .. . .. .. . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . ; . . .. :�.�:� ction: . .;.. . .... ,:... . . . - �:::.:: .. .,.. . .. . . .. . . _ .. . . .. . .. .. . � � �� Chair��Van .Vliet..moved =t�o�� conti.nue �� er� �a � licant's re��u�st�.�� Motion .was�� . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .... : - � �.::. pp: . �.:.. � q . . ..._ . .. .. : . :� .. . ...... . �� seconded b:� Commission.er Lambell.and carried:by:a:6=0-1 vote, with�Lambell, �� : :::. ::��: .. :�. .. Y . . .. .. . . ... . . .. . ... . .. . . . �� - � �� Le:vin, �McAufiffe;��Mcl,�ntosh,��Schm�i�d,�and Van �Vfi�et��voting YE� �a�n�d �Vu�ks�ic �.:- -� �� . .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. : . :� .. .. : . :� . .. �. .. :. : .. . . .. .. . .. . .. ..�� : :.� .. .. : : . . . .... ... . a sent.:::�: .. . . .. . .. . .. , :... . _... . .... . .... . .... � .. . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . .. . .. . �: ;.:. ::.�: G:\PlanningWanine Judy�ARC\1 Minutes�2019\190514min.do�X: �� :Page:8:of 9 �: :�: :.��: :: :�:� ::��: :: :-:� :. ARCHITECTURAL RE.,�W COMMISSION MINUTES May 14, 2019 B. Preliminary Plans: None C. Miscellaneous Items: None VI. COMMENTS None VII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Levin moved to adjourn the Architectural Review Commission meeting at 1:35 p.m. ��' KEVIN SWARTZ� ASSOCIATE PLANNER SECRETARY , � �� ,� � JANI E UDY RE ING S CRETARY �:�Pia��9ve�me��eywacvmmmes�zo�sveosinmmaoo. Pa90 9 Of 9