The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGeneral Plan Update Traffic Study Addendum 2003 ,Y RECEIVED SEP a uRB�►�u copy CROSSROADS ;1 September 17, 2003 1 Mr. John Criste TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH 400 S. Farrell, Suite B-205 Palm Springs, CA 0262 Subject: City of Palm Desert General Plan Update Traffic Study Addendum (Supplemental Analysis) Dear Mr. Criste: Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide this Supplemental Analysis to the City of Palm Desert General Plan Traffic Study (Urban Crossroads, Inc., September, 2003, referred to as the Traffic Study in this addendum to the document). Additional analysis has been performed to compare the current City of Palm Desert forecasts to the recently completed Coachella Valley traffic model forecasts, provide daily roadway segment analysis on segments of Bob Hope Drive, and to facilitate better understanding of roadway segment levels of service. BOB HOPE DRIVE SEGMENT ANALYSIS Bob Hope Drive is outside the City of Palm Desert Sphere of Influence, but is analyzed because of the reconfiguration of the Ramon Road interchange. Daily - segment analysis has been performed at your request for roadway segments of Bob Hope Drive from Varner Road to Frank Sinatra Drive. A summary comparison of daily traffic volumes (similar to that in the Executive Summary of the Traffic Study) is included as Table 1. Table 2 corresponds to Table ES-3 in .Y 41 Corporate Park^ Suite 300- Irvine,CA 92606 p:949.660.1994-f:949.660.1911 urbanxroads.com Mr. John Criste TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH September 17, 2003 Page 2 the Traffic Study and compares volume/capacity (V/C) ratios for all future scenarios. Existing segment analysis cannot be performed, as the data is not available. A small change in V/C ratio occurs between alternatives, but they all follow the same pattem of LOS "F" between Varner Road and Ramon Road and LOS "C" or "D" south of Ramon Road. Tables 3 through 6 contain capacity analysis for the Currently Adopted General Plan, Preferred, Less Intense, and More Intense alternatives, respectively. PALM DESERT AND COACHELLA VALLEY FORECASTS The recently completed draft Coachella Valley Area Transportation System (CVATS) daily roadway segment data has been reviewed and is generally consistent, although the draft CVATS data indicates a greater number of daily LOS capacity issues (volume exceeding generalized daily planning capacities). Urban Crossroads, Inc. believes that the more detailed subarea model used in the Traffic Study is more accurate and should continue to be used for this General Plan Update. PEAK HOUR SEGMENT ANALYSIS To better understand the relationship of daily roadway segment LOS as compared to intersection LOS, peak hour roadway segment analysis has been performed at the five (5) Preferred Alternative roadway segments with the worst service levels (that are next to an intersection analysis location). The peak hour roadway segment analysis methodology uses a peak hour capacity of 1,600 vehicles per lane per hour (vplph) (the Highway Capacity Manual recommends a default value at intersections of 1,900 vplph; this value has been reduced to reflect potential side friction, bus stops, etc.). The total directional capacity is determined by multiplying the number of lanes by the peak hour capacity per lane. Determining the directional LOS requires calculation of the of the directional peak hour traffic volume divided by the directional peak hour roadway segment capacity. Attachment A contains the result of this analysis. A summary of Mr. John Criste TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH September 17, 2003 Page 3 peak hour service levels is included as Table 8. As shown in Table 8, even though the daily segment analysis shows deficient operations, peak hour segment analysis reflects acceptable service levels. This clearly illustrates the critical role of intersections in roadway system operations and supports our recommendation that daily analysis should pnly be used as a screening tool to identify roadway segments where ongoing monitoring of intersection operations should be a Circulation Element Policy. CLOSING Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide this addendum to the City of Palm Desert General Plan Traffic Study. Please do not hesitate to give us a call at (949) 660-1994 if you have any questions regarding this supplemental analysis. Sincerely, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Carlet n aters, P.E. Principal JN: 00055-05 CW:MW:rd Attachments TABLE I BOB HOPE DRIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) SUMMARY Daily Traffic Volume Roadway Existing Less More Segment From To General Plan Preferred Intense Intense Bob Hope Dr. Varner Rd. I-10 Fwy. 61,442 61,475 61,571 62,650 Bob Hope Dr. I-10 Fwy. Ramon Rd. 61,481 61,856 61,480 62,443 Bob Hope Dr. Ramon Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 45,833 45,983 45,198 46,283 Bob Hope Dr. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 40,094 41,746 40,824 41,893 _Bob Hope Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 44,350 44,581 44,301 45,377 TABLE II BOB HOPE DRIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY Volume Thesholds Volume/Capacity Roadway Existing Less More Segment From To LOS "C" LOS "D" Capacity General Plan Preferred Intense Intense Bob Hope Dr. Varner Rd. I-10 Fwy. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 Bob Hope Dr. I-10 Fwy. Ramon Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.18 1.19 1.18 1.20 Bob Hope Dr. Ramon Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.88 0.88 0.87 0.89 Bob Hope Dr. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.77 0.80 0.79 0.81 Bob Hope Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.85 0.86 0.85 0.87 TABLE III BOB HOPE DRIVE CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY Roadway Final Roadway Segment From To Forecast Classification Capacity V/C LOS Bob Hope Dr. Varner Rd, I-10 Fwy. 61,442 Urban Arterial 52,000 1.18 F Bob Hope Dr. I-10 Fwy. Ramon Rd. 61,481 Urban Arterial 52,000 1.18 F Bob Hope Dr. Ramon Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 45,833 Urban Arterial 52,000 0.88 D Bob Hope Dr. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 40,094 Arterial 52,000 0.77 C Bob Hope Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 44,350 Arterial 52,000 0.85 D TABLE IV BOB HOPE DRIVE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY Roadway Final Roadway Segment From To Forecast Classification Capacity V/C LOS Bob Hope Dr. Varner Rd. I-10 Fwy. 61,475 Urban Arterial 52,000 1.18 F Bob Hope Dr. I-10 Fwy. Ramon Rd. 61,856 Urban Arterial 52,000 . 1.19 F Bob Hope Dr. Ramon Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 45,983 Urban Arterial 52,000 0.88 D Bob Hope Dr. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 41,746 Arterial 52,000 0.80 C Bob Hope Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 44,581 Arterial 52,000 0.86 D TABLE V BOB HOPE DRIVE LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY Roadway Final Roadway Segment From To Forecast Classification Capacity V/C LOS Bob Hope Dr. Varner Rd. I-10 Fwy. 61,571 Urban Arterial 52,000 1.18 F Bob Hope Dr. I-10 Fwy. Ramon Rd. 61,480 Urban Arterial 52,000 1.18 F Bob Hope Dr. Ramon Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 45,198 Urban Arterial 52,000 0.87 D Bob Hope Dr. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 40,824 Arterial 52,000 0.79 C Bob Hope Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 44,301 Arterial 52,000 0.85 D TABLE VI BOB HOPE DRIVE MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY Roadway Final Roadway Segment From To Forecast Classification Capacity V/C LOS Bob Hope Dr. Varner Rd. I-10 Fwy. 62,650 Urban Arterial 52,000 1.20 F Bob Hope Dr. I-10 Fwy. Ramon Rd. 62,443 Urban Arterial 52,000 1.20 F Bob Hope Dr. Ramon Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 46,283 Urban Arterial 52,000 0.89 D Bob Hope Dr. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 41,893 Arterial 52,000 0.81 D Bob Hope Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 45,377 Arterial 52,000 0.87 D TABLE VII PEAK HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS Through Daily Daily Peak Hour Roadway Segment ADT Lanes Capacity V/C Capacity Highest Peak Volume V/C LOS Washington St. n/o Country Club 74,800 3 52,000 1.44 4,800 2,940 (PM Southbound) 0.61 B Washington St. s/o Varner Rd. 72,600 3 52,000 1.40 4,800 3,231 (PM Northbound) 0.67 B SR-111 e/o Eldorado Dr. 72,000 3 52,000 1.39 4,800 2,338 (PM Westbound) 0.49 A SR-111 n/o Parkview Dr./Painters Path 68,600 3 52,000 1.32 4,800 2,613 (PM Eastbound) 0,54 A SR-111 w/o Eldorado Dr. 65,800 3 52,000 1.27 4,800 2,075 (AM Westbound) 0.43 A ATTACHMENT A PEAK HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS Link: Washington St. n/o Country Club Dr. Daily V/C 1.44 Intersection: Washington St.(NS)at Country Club Dr.(EW) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction NB SB NB SB Peak Hour Volume 2338 2164 2878 2940 Number of Lanes(NL) 3 3 3 3 Unconstrained Capacity(UC)x 1600 1600 1600 1600 Peak Hour Link Capacity(PHLC)= 4800 4800 4800 4800 Peak Hour V/C= 0.49 0.45 0.60 0.61 Link: Washington St.s/o Varner Rd. Daily V/C 1.40 Intersection: Washington St.(NS)at Varner Rd.(EW) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction NB SB NB SB Peak Hour Volume 2708 1982 3231 2803 Number of Lanes(NL) 3 3 3 3 Unconstrained Capacity(UC)x 1600 1600 1600 1600 Peak Hour Link Capacity(PHLC)= 4800 4800 4800 4800 Peak Hour V/C= 0.56 0.41 0.67 0.58 Link: SR-III e/o Eldorado Dr. Daily V/C 1.39 Intersection: Eldorado Dr.(NS)at SR-III (EW) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction EB WB EB WB Peak Hour Volume 2234 2229 2250 2338 Number of Lanes(NL) 3 3 3 3 Unconstrained Capacity(UC)x 1600 1600 1600 1600 Peak Hour Link Capacity(PHLC)= 4800 4800 4800 4800 Peak Hour V/C= 0.47 0.46 0.47 0.49 Link: SR-111 w/o Parkview DrJPainters Path Daily VIC 1.32 Intersection: Parkview DrJPainters Path(NS)at SR-111 (EW) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction EB WB EB WB Peak Hour Volume 1911 1985 2613 2537 Number of Lanes(NL) 3 3 3 3 Unconstrained Capacity(UC)x 1600 1600 1600 1600 Peak Hour Link Capacity(PHLC)= 4800 4800 4800 4800 Peak Hour V/C= 0.40 0.41 0.54 0.53 Link: SR-1II w/o Eldorado Dr. Daily V/C 1.27 Intersection: Eldorado Dr.(NS)at SR-111 (EW) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Direction EB WB EB WB Peak Hour Volume 1963 2075 1787 1794 Number of Lanes(NL) 3 3 3 3 Unconstrained Capacity(UC)x 1600 1600 1600 1600 Peak Hour Link Capacity(PHLC)= 4800 4800 4800 4800 Peak Hour V/C= 0.41 0.43 0.37 0.37 t URBAN CROSSROAr>S Y`. CITY OF PALM DESERT �i GENERAL PLAN TRAFFIC STUDY Y�. °: - Palm Desert =`M ` California y, URBAN CROSSROADS, MC. 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 Phone: (949) 660-1994 Fax: (949) 660-1911 www-urhanxroads.com CITY OF PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN TRAFFIC STUDY PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Mr. John Criste TERRA NOVA PLANNING & RESEARCH 400 S. Farrell, Suite B-205 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Prepared by: URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 John Kain, AICP Carleton Waters, P.E. Marlie m P.E. �OFES3/p ON F yc 9N No.52916 m rn .12131 Cfv% CALF September 5, 2003 JK:CW:MW:rd JN:00055-04 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVESUMMARY............................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction.................................... 1.2 Forecasting Procedures ...................................................................... 14 1.3 Land Use Data...................................................................................... 1-6 1.4 Forecast Refinement Procedure ......................................................... 1-6 1.5 Analysis Criteria.................................................................................... 1-7 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Existing Roadway Characteristics........................................................ 2-1 2.2 Existing Daily Volume to Capacity(V/C) Ratios................................... 2-4 2.3 Existing Intersection Service Levels..................................................... 2-13 2.4 Transportation Planning Context.......................................................... 2-26 2.4.1 City of Palm Desert Currently Adopted General Plan ............... 2-26 2.4.2 The Regional Transportation Plan............................................. 2-29 2.4.3 Riverside County Integrated Project................................. ......... 2-36 2.4.2 Congestion Management Program........................................... 2-36 3.0 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVES....................... 3-1 3.1 Currently Adopted General Plan Alternative Daily Traffic Volumes...... 3-1 3.2 Currently Adopted General Plan Alternative Daily Level of Service Analysis ................................................................................................ 3-4 4.0 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE......................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Preferred Alternative Daily Traffic Volumes.......................................... 4-1 4.2 Preferred Alternative Daily Level of Service......................................... 44 4.3 Preferred Alternative Peak Hour Analysis.............................................. 4-4 5.0 LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE...................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Less Intense Alternative Daily Traffic Volumes.................................... 5-1 5.2 Less Alternative Daily Level of Service ................................................ 54 6.0 MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ............................. ..... 6-1 ................................. 6.1 More Intense Alternative Daily Traffic Volumes.................................... 6-1 6.2 More Alternative Daily Level of Service................................................ 64 7.0 SPECIAL ISSUES........................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Portola Interchange Evaluation ............................................................ 7-1 .......................... 7.2 Free Right Turn Lane Review............................................................. 7-25 8.0 ACCOMODATIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE TRAVEL MODES ........................ 8-1 8.1 Goff Cart Plan....................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 Bikeways .:............................................................................................ 8-1 8.3 Bus Routes........................................................................................... 8-4 8.4 Pedestrian Access................................................................................ 8-4 APPENDICES EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) COUNT DATA .................................... A EXISTING PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION COUNT DATA........................................... B EXISTING CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS ........................ C EXISTING INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS ........................................... D CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMEREFINEMENTS ............................................................................................ E PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME REFINEMENTS................ F PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUME REVIEW..... G GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (POST-2020) TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS.., H GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT (POST-2020) PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS ................................................................ INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO LOS "D" ORBETTER......................................................................... J INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO LOS "C" ORBETTER.................................................................................................................. K LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME REFINEMENTS............. L MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE DAILY TRAFFIC REFINEMENTS........................... M PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE WITHOUT PROPOSED PORTOLA AVENUE AT 1-10 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME REFINEMENTS...... N PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECAST COMPARISON (PORTOLA INTERCHANGE EVALUATION) ..................................... O CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE - POST 2020 WITH DESERT GATEWAY PROJECT (ALTERNATIVE 1 - PREFERRED) WITH PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE.......................................... P CALCULATION OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE - POST 2020 WITH DESERT GATEWAY PROJECT (ALTERNATIVE 1 - PREFERRED) WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE ....................... Q COOK STREET AND GERALD FORD DRIVE EASTBOUND FREE RIGHT TURN REMOVAL INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ........................................................... R LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT PAGE ES-A RECOMMENDED CITY OF PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT.....................................................................ES-16 ES-B CITY OF PALM DESERT RECOMMENDED ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS...............................................................................ES-17 1-A LOCATION MAP................................................................................... 1-2 1-13 STUDY AREA ....................................................................................... 1-3 1-C PALM DESERT TAZ STRUCTURE...................................................... 1-5 2-A EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES....................................... 2-2 2-B EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)..................................... 2-5 2-C EXISTING VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIOS............................................ 2-6 2-D EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY (PAGE 1 OF 3) .................. 2-14 2-E EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY (PAGE 2 OF 3) .................. 2-15 2-F EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY (PAGE 3 OF 3) .................. 2-16 2-G EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES (PAGE 1 OF 3)...................................................................................... 2-17 2-H EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES (PAGE 2 OF 3)...................................................................................... 2-18 2-1 EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES (PAGE 3 OF 3)...................................................................................... 2-19 2-J EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES (PAGE 1 OF 3)...................................................................................... 2-20 2-K EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES (PAGE 2 OF 3)...................................................................................... 2-21 2-L EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES (PAGE 3 OF 3)...................................................................................... 2-22 2-M CURRENTLY ADOPTED CITY OF PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT..................................... 2-27 2-N CITY OF PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS.............................................................................. 2-30 2-0 PROPOSED RCIP NETWORK........................................................... 2-37 2-P CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT NUMBER OF THROUGHLANES ............................................................................... 2-38 2-Q RIVERSIDE COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) SYSTEM (COACHELLA VALLEY)............................................ 2-40 3-A CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)....................................................... 3-3 3-B CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO................................................................ 3-5 4-A PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) ..... 4-3 4-13 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO............... 4-5 4-C AM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (PAGE 1 OF 3)............................................. 4-13 4-D AM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (PAGE 2 OF 3)............................................. 4-14 4-E AM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (PAGE 3 OF 3)............................................. 4-15 4-F PM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (PAGE 1 OF 3)............................................. 4-16 4-G PM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (PAGE 2 OF 3)............................................. 4-17 4-H PM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (PAGE 3 OF 3)............................................. 4-18 5-A LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) 5-3 5-B LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO ......... 5-10 6-A MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) 6-3 6-B MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO......... 6-4 7-A NO PORTOLA AVENUE INTERCHANGE AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)..................................................................................... 7-2 7-13 NO PORTOLA AVENUE INTERCHANGE VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO.................................................................................................... 7-7 7-C POST 2020 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)WITH PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE..................................... 7-13 7-D POST 2020 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE..................................... 7-14 7-E POST 2020 AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE........ 7-17 7-F POST 2020 PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE........ 7-18 7-G POST 2020 AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE 7-23 7-H POST 2020 PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE 7-24 8-A CITY OF PALM DESERT PROPOSED BIKEWAYS SYSTEM ........... 8-2 8-13 CITY OF PALM DESERT GOLF CART TRANSPORTATION ROUTEMAP.............................................................................................. 8-3 8-C SUNBUS SYSTEM MAP...................................................................... 8-5 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE ES-1 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE LAND USE ALTERNATIVE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY.................................. ES-2 ES-2 PALM DESERT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) SUMMARY .......... ES-5 ES-3 PALM DESERT VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY...............................ES-11 ES-4 COMPARISON OF DEFICIENT STUDY AREA ROADWAYS ..............ES-15 ES-5 ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE LEVELOF SERVICE "D" .......................................................................ES-19 ES-6 IMPROVEMENTS TO ACHIEVE LEVEL OF SERVICE "C....................ES-20 2-1 PALM DESERT EXISTING DAILY VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY. 2-7 2-2 EXISTING ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUMES GREATER THAN CAPACITY (LOS "F„) ................................................................. 2-10 2-3 EXISTING DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE «E........................................................................................... 2-11 2-4 EXISTING DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE "D........................................................................................... 2-12 2-5 EXISTING (2002) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SUMMARY................................................. 2-23 2-6 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MASTER LIST OF FUNDED/ASSUMED IMPROVEMENTS ............................... 2-31 3-1 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN SCENARIO TRIP-END SUMMARY....... 3-2 3-2 PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY............................... 3-6 3-3 PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY (LOS "F") ..................................................... 3-10 3-4 PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY (LOS "E„)...................................................... 3-11 3-5 PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY (LOS "D") ..................................................... 3-12 4-1 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE "PREFERRED" SCENARIO TRIP-END SUMMARY...................................................... 4-2 4-2 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY......................................................... 4-6 4-3 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY (LOS "F").... 4-10 4-4 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY (LOS "E").... 4-11 4-5 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE "D....................................... 4-12 4-6 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSISSUMMARY ....................................................................... 4-20 4-7 REQUIRED PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS ................................................................. 4-22 5-1 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE LESS INTENSE SCENARIO TRIP-END SUMMARY...................................................... 5-2 5-2 PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY......................................................... 5-5 5-3 PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY (LOS "F")...... 5-11 54 PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE "E" .................................... 5-12 5-5 PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE "D....................................... 5-13 6-1 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MORE INTENSE SCENARIO TRIP-END SUMMARY...................................................... 6-2 6-2 PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY......................................................... 6-5 6-3 PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY (LOS "F").... 6-10 6-4 PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE "E....................................... 6-11 6-5 PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE "D....................................... 6-12 7-1 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE AT I-10 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY............................ 7-3 7-2 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY COMPARISON ................................................. 7-8 7-3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR POST 2020 WITH PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE................................... 7-15 7-4 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR POST 2020 WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE................................... 7-21 CITY OF PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN TRAFFIC STUDY PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Existing conditions data collection and analysis has been completed that includes existing daily and key intersection peak hour peak season traffic volumes, existing roadway segment number of through lanes and key intersection lane configuration and traffic control device data, existing daily roadway segment volume to capacity ratios (V/C) ratios (10 segments at LOS "D", 7 segments at LOS "E", 7 segments at LOS "F", for a total of 24 segments experiencing LOS "D" or worse conditions) and peak hour intersection analysis and turn movement values (8 deficient locations at LOS "D" or worse). The existing conditions also includes currently adopted Circulation Plans, including City of Palm Desert Circulation Element and cross-sections and a lane configuration table summarizing planned improvements (Table 2-6). Four different General Plan land use alternatives have been evaluated, including: • Currently Adopted • Preferred Alternative • Less Intense • More Intense Table ES-1 compares trip generation for the four scenarios. The Currently Adopted General Plan generates the least amount of daily traffic (964,232 daily trip-ends), with increased traffic generating potential for the other three alternatives, all of which generate between 1,000,000 and 1,010,000 daily trip-ends. The percentage difference between the lowest generating alternative (Currently Adopted) and the highest generating alternative (More Intense) is 10.29%. In addition, many roadways within the ES-1 TAbcr s-1 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE LAND USE ALTERNATIVE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY NORTH DISTRICT CURRENTLY CURRENTLY CURRENTLY ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED GENERAL GENERAL LESS GENERAL MORE PURPOSE PLAN PREFERRED DELTA(A) %CHANGE PLAN INTENSE DELTA(A) %CHANGE PLAN INTENSE DELTA(A) %CHANGE Home Based Work Productions 9,669 14,788 5,119 52.94% 9,669 13,358 3,6891 38.15% 9,669 17,179 7,510 77.67% Home Based Work Attractions 21,930 22,848 918 4.19% 21,930 21,669 -261 -1.19% 21,930 23,168 1,238 5.65% Home Based Social/Recreation Productions 10,010 15,859 5,849 58.43% 10,010 13,766 3,756 37.52% 10,010 18,250 8,240 82.32% Home BasedSocial/Recreation Attractions 16,884 16,716 -168 -1.00% 16,884 16,185 -699 -4.14% 16,884 17,347 463 2,74% Home Based Shopping/Personal Business Productions 22,499 35.733 13,234 58.82% 22,499 30,889 8,3901 37.29% 22,499 41,078 18,579 82.58% Home based Shopping/Personal Business Attractions 47,954 49,927 1,973 4.11% 47,954 49,040 1,086 2.26% 47,954 51,067 3,113 6.49% Home Based School Productions 2,911 4,556 1,645 56.51% 2,911 4,006 1,095 37.62% 2,911 5,260 2,349 80.69% Home basedcoo Attractions 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% Non-Home Based Productions 82,322 84,347 2,025 2,46% 82,322 81,717 -605 -0.73% 82,322 84,939 2,617 3.18% Non-Home Based Attractions 82,3341 84,382 2,048 2.49% 82,334 81,715 -619 -0.75% 82,334 84,927 2,593 3.15% Total Productions 127,4111 155,283 27,872 21,88% 127,411 143,736 16,325 12.81% 127,411 166,706 39295 30,84% Total Attractions 169,102 173,873 4,771 2.82% 169,102 168,609 -493 -0.29% 169,102 176,509 7,407 4.38% OVERALL TOTAL 296,513 329,156 32,643 11.01% 296,513 312,345 15,832 5.34% 296,513 343,215 46,702 1SJ5% N MID DISTRICT CURRENTLY CURRENTLY CURRENTLY ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED GENERAL GENERAL LESS GENERAL MORE PURPOSE PLAN PREFERRED DELTA(A) %CHANGE PLAN INTENSE DELTA(A) %CHANGE PLAN INTENSE DELTA(A) %CHANGE Home Based Work Productions 2,345 3,411 1,066 45.46%1 2,345 2,998 653 27.85% 2,345 3,980 1,635 69.72% Home Based Work Attractions 7,742 5,807 -1,935 -24.99% 7,742 6,583 -1,159 -14,97% 7,742 6,585 -1,157 -14.94% Home Based Social/Recreation Productions 2,345 3,610 1,265 53,94% 2,345 3,086 741 31.60% 2,345 4,297 1,952 83.24% Home BasedSocial/Recreation Attractions 11,171 9,272 -1,899 -17.00% 11,171 9,041 -2,130 -19.07% 11.171 8,914 -2,257 -20.20% Home Based Shopping/Personal Business Productions 5,245 8,121 2,876 54.83% 5,245 6,924 1,679 32.01% 5,245 9,687 4,442 84.69% Home Based Shopping/Personal Business Attractions 33,089 33,494 405 1.22% 33,089 29,882 -3,207 -9.69% 33,089 29,678 -3,411 -10.31% Home Based School Productions 689 1,041 352 51.09% 689 896 207 30.04% 689 1,233 544 78.96% Home based SchoolAttractions 9,464 11,750 2,286 24.15% 9,464 9,649 185 1.95% 9,464 9,863 399 4.22/° Non-Home Based Productions 46,862 42,123 -4,739 -10.11% 46,862 40,313 -6,549 -13.98% 46,862 39,235 -7,627 -16.28% Non-Home Based Attractions 46,844 42,132 .4,712 -10.06% 46,844 40,242 -6,602 -14.09% 46,844 39,267 -7,577 -16.17% Total Productions 57.486 58,306 820 1.43% 57,486 54,217 -3,269 -5.69% 57,486 58,432 946 1.65% Total Attractions 108,310 102,455 -5,855 -5.41% 108,310 95,397 -12,913 -11.92% 108,310 94,307JOVERALL A 14,003 12.93% , , - , 5 -3.04% 165,796 149,614 -16,182 -9.76% 165,796 152,739 -13,057 -7.88% TABLE ES-i (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE LAND USE ALTERNATIVE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY SOUTH DISTRICT CURRENTLY CURRENTLY CURRENTLY ADOPTED ADOPTED ADOPTED GENERAL GENERAL LESS GENERAL MORE PURPOSE PLAN PREFERRED DELTA(A) %CHANGE PLAN INTENSE DELTA(A) %CHANGE PLAN INTENSE DELTA(,�) %CHANGE Home Based Work Productions 28,106 29,208 1,102 3.92% 28,106 29,163 1,057 3.76% 28,106 29,515 1,409 5.01% Home Based Work ttrac ons 20,139 20,684 545 2.71% 20.139 20,548 409 2.03% 20,139 20.953 814 4.04% Home Based Social/Recreation Productions 28,646 29,812 1,166 4.07% 28,646 29,752 1,106 3.86% 28.646 30,119 1,473 5.14% Home BasedSocial/Recreation Attractions 29,762 34,354 4,592 15.43% 29,762 34.014 4,252 14.29% 29,762 34,987 5.225 17,56% Home Based Shopping/Personal Business Productions 64,172 66,796 2,624 4.09% 64,172 66,658 2.486 3.87% 64,172 67,477 3,305 5.15% Home Based hopping Personal Business Attractions 74,441 89,845 15,404 20.69% 74,441 89,205 14,764 19.83% 74,441 92,343 17,902 24.05% Home Based School Productions 8,371 8,711 340 4.06% 8,371 8,695 324 3.87% 8,371 8,801 430 5.14% ome Based SchoolAttractions 9,785 10,009 224 2.29% 9,785 10,253 468 4.78% 9,785 10,509 724 7.40/° Non-Home Based Productions 118,734 135,170 16,436 13.84% 118,734 135,042 16,308 13.73% 118,734 1135,8621 17,128 14.43% Non-Home Based Attractions 118,797 135,167 16,370 13.78% 118,797 135,038 16,241 13,67% 118,797 135,860 17,063 14.36% Total Productions 248,029 269,697 21,668 8.74% 248,029 269,310 21,281 8.58% 248,029 271,774 23,745 9,57% Total Attractions 252,924 290,059 37,135 14.68% 252,924 289,058 36,134 14.29% 252,924 294,652 41,728 16.50% ,OVERALLTOTAL 500,953 559,756 58,803 11.74% 500,953 558,3 88 57,4151 11.46% 500,953 566,426 65,473 13.07% CITYWIDE TOTAL EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING W GENERAL GENERAL LESS GENERAL MORE PURPOSE PLAN PREFERRED DELTA(A) %CHANGE PLAN INTENSE DELTA(A) %CHANGE PLAN INTENSE DELTA(A) %CHANGE Home Based Work Productions 40,120 47�4071 7,287 18.16% 40,120 45,519 5,399 13.46% 40,120 50,674 10,554 26.31% Home BasedWork Attractions 49,811 49,339 -472 -0.95% 49,811 48,800 .1,011 -2.03% 49,811 50,706 895 1.80% Home Based Social/Recreation Productions 41,001 49,281 8,280 20.19% 41,001 46,604 5,603 13.67% 41,001 52,666 11,665 28.45% Home BasedSocial/Recreation Attractions 57,817 60,342 2,525 4.37% 57,817 59,240 1,423 2.46% 57,817 61,248 3,431 5.93% Home Based Shopping/Personal Business Productions 91,916 110,650 18,734 20.38% 91,916 104,471 12,555 13.66% 91,916 118,242 26,326 28.64% Home Based Shopping/ ersona Business Attractions 155,484 173,266 17,782 11.44% 155,484 168,127 12,643 8.13% 155,484 173.088 17,604 11.32% Home Based School Productions 11,971 14,308 2,337 19.52% 11,971 13,597 1,626 13.58% 11,971 15,2941 3,323 27.760/.Home Based SchoolAttractions 19,249 21,759 2,510 13.04% 99,249 19,902 653 3.39% 19,249 20,372 11123 5.83% Non-Home Based Productions 247,918 261,640 13,722 5.53% 247,918 257.072 9,154 3.69% 247.918 260,036 12,118 4,89% Non-Home Based Attractions 247,975 261,681 13,706 5.53% 247.975 256,995 9,020 3.64% 247,975 260,054 12,079 4.87% Total Productions 432,926 483,286 50,360 11.63% 432,926 467,263 34,337 7.93% 432,926 496,912 63,986 14.78% Total Attractions 530,336 566,387 36,051 6.80% 530,336 553,064 22,728 4.29% 530,336 565,468 35,132 6.62% OVERALL TOTAL 963.262 1,049,673 86,4111 8,97% 963,262 1,020,327 57,065 5.92% 963,262 1,062,380 99,118 10,29% U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055.04.xis]TES-1 City of Palm Desert also carry through traffic that neither begins nor ends within the City, further reducing the differences in forecast traffic volumes between alternatives. Future conditions data includes daily volume forecasts and v/c ratio calculations for all 4 primary General Plan land use alternatives. The preferred alternative has also been evaluated without the future proposed 1-10 Freeway Interchange at Portola Avenue. While some variation in daily volume forecasts does occur between the different land use scenarios, substantial changes in roadway segment operations do not occur. Table ES-2 summarizes daily volume forecasts for the four scenarios. Table ES-3 shows daily volume/capacity ratios throughout the study area. Daily volume/capacity analysis has revealed patterns of daily planning level capacity issues on north-south roadways with 1-10 freeway access in the vicinity of the 1-10 interchanges. Daily volume/capacity calculations also reflect poor service levels on SR-111 and the 1-10 Freeway. Table ES- 4 compares the number of deficiencies by scenario. There is no substantial improvement/change in the study areawide service levels with any land use alternative. The More Intense alternative includes slightly more deficiencies than any other alternative, and the Existing General Plan reflects the fewest deficiencies, as expected upon review of the trip generation summaries. Exhibit ES-A shows the recommended Circulation Plan for the City of Palm Desert. Most roadways have the same classification as on the currently adopted General Plan Circulation Element. The area has been expanded to include the City's North Sphere area. Classifications for the North Sphere area have been compared to the current RCIP network, and most roadways have smaller classifications than in the RCIP plan. Recommendations should be made to reconcile the RCIP network with the Recommended City of Palm Desert Circulation Plan. Exhibit ES-B shows roadway cross-sections for Circulation Plan facilities. The Secondary Roadway cross-section has been reconfigured within the same right-of-way to provide a four lane divided cross-section because Secondary roadways throughout the City are generally striped to provide separate left turn lanes for vehicles turning left. ES-4 TABLE ES-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC(ADT)SUMMARY DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME EXISTING EXISTING LESS MORE ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT GENERAL PLAN PREFERRED INTENSE INTENSE Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. Icountry Club Dr. 22,100 40,993 46,389 45,936 47,463 Cook St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln.E. 27,700 45,490 51,236 50,713 51,490 Cook St. Hovley Ln, E. Fred Waring Dr. 25,500 34,302 37,263 38,453 37,630 Cook St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 14,300 32,695 35,707 35,597 35,919 Cook St. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 7,300 7,300 7,121 7,132 7,162 Emerald Desert Dr. Kalahari Desert Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 2,200 2,200 2,132 2,181 2,211 Eldorado Dr, Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 3,200 3,200 3,304 3,216 3,367 Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr, Hovley Ln. E. 3,500 7,759 10,884 10,971 11,250 Via Toscana Hovley Ln.E. Pisa 2,749 2,843 2,829 2,903 Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 5,400 9,472 9,651 9,7 00 9,661 Eldorado Dr. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 4,500 9,001 9,523 9,508 9,610 Thousand Palms Canyon Rd, Dillon Rd. Ramon Rd. 1,600 2,757 4,363 4,146 4,446 Oasis Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 5,200 5,200 6,281 6,111 6,834 Washington St. Av.38 Varner Rd, 9,500 62,030 62,745 60,455 64,386 Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 23,700 69,872 72,613 70,851 73,936 Uy Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr. 46,200 71,124 74,786 73,625 75,991 Washington St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 15,300 41,372 43,769 42,863 44,565 Washin ton St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Waring Dr. 31,000 43,255 45,151 45,099 45,502 Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 27,200 45,351 46,695 46,319 47,132 Dillon Rd. Hot Springs Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 2,500 2,789 3,658 3,526 3,715 Ramon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 EB Rams 24,100 46,585 47,053 46,654 48,133 Ramon Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 1-10 WB Rams 19,100 27,476 28,475 28,015 30,010 Ramon Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Varner Rd. 15,900 27,476 28,475 28,015 30,010 Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. Chase School Rd. 6,600 10,627 15,819 13,846 20,245 Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av, 20,500 46,791 46,798 46,629 47,326 Dinah Shore Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av, - 39,309 37,127 35,069 35,599 Gerald Ford Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 15,600 38,809 39,837 38,215 39,539 Gerald Ford Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 15,500 40,576 43,633 41,590 42,983 Gerald Ford Dr, Portola Av. Cook St. 5,900 33,277 34,428 34,286 34,280 Gerald Ford Dr, Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. 4,000 11,830 16,215 14,836 16,138 Spine Rd. Portola Av. Cook St. 3,845 12,230 12,200 11,954 Frank Sinatra Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 13,500 24,309 24,918 25,870 25,638 Frank Sinatra Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 11,300 25,920 27,522 27,419 28,370 Frank Sinatra Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 6,600 22,874 26,142 25,106 26,785 Frank Sinatra Dr. Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr, 6,000 8,259 8,240 8,527 7,465 Frank Sinatra Dr, Gerald Ford Dr, Eldorado Dr. 9,200 15,627 17,432 16,793 17,088 Av, 38 Varner Rd, Washington St, 300 26,907 24,652 22,750 25,175 Tamarisk Row Dr Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. 6.400 13,249 14,998 14,541 14,741 Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey 4,000 30.697 29,205 30,379 30,974 Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey Portola Av. 4,000 17,626 17,326 17,751 17,961 Varner Rd. Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola 4,000 43,024 44,711 43,619 44,608 TABLE ES-2 PALM DESERT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)SUMMARY DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME EXISTING EXISTING LESS MORE COUNT G;ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT GENERAL PLAN PREFERRED INTENSE INTENS Desert Crossing north of SR-111 SR-111 1,500 1,500 1,512 1,513 1,512 Desert Crossing SR-111 south of SR-111 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 8,600 Town Center W . Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 7,700 7,700 8,156 8,088 8,242 EI Paseo SR-111 Plaza W . 5,800 8,436 8,946 8,901 9,079 El Paseo SR-111 Portola Av. 6,500 10,115 11,038 11,011 11,467 Plaza W . Shopping Center SR-111 4,500 4,500 4,509 4,517 4,529 Monterey Av, Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 15,600 46,074 47,451 46,405 48,163 .Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 22,600 52,975 53,765 52,526 54,196 Monterey Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. 32,700 63,657 64,860 62,379 64,576 Monterey Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 34,600 40,055 42,238 41,872 42,538 Monterey Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 22,900 31,172 32,943 32,339 33,578 Monterey Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr, 30,600 30,600 33,226 32,772 34,779 Monterey Av. Country Club Dr. Parkview Dr. 26,300 35,948 38,963 38,298 39,589 Monterey Av. Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 23,000 30,018 32,388 32,561 32,671- Monterey Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 20,500 27,574 29,738 30,061 29,774 Monterey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 22,800 37,529 39,068 39,340 39,112 College of the Desert north of Fred Waring Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 4,300 4,300 4,384 4,424 4,430 College of the Desert Fred Warina Dr. south of Fred Waring Dr, 400 681 1,020 1,031 1,033 i San Pablo Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 10,000 10,000 10,153 10,112 10,218 ui San Pablo Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 11,300 11,300 12,863 12,711 12,903 San Pablo Av. SR-111 El Paseo 5,600 5,600 6,268 6,023 6,387 San Luis Rey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 6,600 6,600 6,810 6,773 6,665 Portola Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramps - 33,118 34,419 32,848 34,462 Portola Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 37,488 38,957 37,269 38,942 Portola Av. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 47,256 48,234 46,379 47,889 Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Sine Rd, 5,200 29,040 30,948 30,156 30,731 Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 9,600 37,492 39,495 39,040 39,301 Portola Av. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 18,600 29,444 31,269 30,699 30,971 Portola Av, Hovley Ln. E. Magnesia Falls Dr. 20,500 27,087 28,358 27,709 28,247 Portola Av, Ma nesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 17,400 22,552 24,266 23,259 23,873 Portola Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 19,300 23,561 24,275 24,082 24,274 Portola Av. SR-111 El Paseo 13,000 13,000 12,955 13,044 12,887 Deep Canyon Rd. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 19,800 19,800 19,538 19,551 19,539 Deep Canyon Rd. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 22,600 22,600 23,350 23,017 23,291 Deep Canyon Rd. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 8,300 8,300 8,464 8,438 8,461 Hospitality Dr, north of SR-111 SR-111 1,500 1,919 1,772 1,867 1,873 Hospitality Dr. SR-111 south of SR-111 5,900 5,900 5,877 5,880 5,905 Chase School Rd. Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. 400 20,269 30,818 22,980 34,683 Chase School Rd. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 5,900 33,934 46,116 40,826 48,773 Cook St. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 10,700 40,912 51,601 47,640 53,216 Cook St. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 21,900 52,743 61,962 59,470 62,935 Cook St. Sine Rd. Frank Sinatra Dr. 16,700 60,648 58,645 60,737 TABLE ES-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)SUMMARY DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME EXISTING1 EXISTING I LESS MORE ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT GENERAL PLAN PREFERRED INTENSE INTENS Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 13,600 20,530 22,777 22,458 22,905 Hovley Ln. E. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 12,800 23,865 27,123 26,806 27,286 Hovley Ln. E. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 14,500 16,688 18,740 19,345 18,863 Av.42 Washington St. Adams St. 23,100 23,100 25,842 25,611 26,365 Magnesia Falls Dr. Monterey Av, Portola Av. 800 5,775 6,564 6,656 6,896 Magnesia Falls Dr. Portola Av, Deep Canyon Rd. 3,400 3,400 2,881 3,020 3,044 Painters Path Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 Parkview Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. 5,100 8,852 9,601 10,238 9,849 Parkview Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert 8,400 8,400 8,277 8,351 8,440 Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 Monterey Av. 15,700 23,387 24,471 24,223 24,265 Fred Waring Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert 28,900 37,294 38,979 39,107 38,627 Fred Waring Dr. College of the Desert San Pablo Av. 28,400 37,966 39,258 39,341 38,884 Fred Waring Dr. San Pablo Av. Portola Av. 38,300 39,623 40,991 40,690 40,384 Fred Waring Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 22,500 37,345 39,412 38,874 38,398 Fred Waring Dr, Deep Canyon Rd. Cook St. 47,600 47,600 49,749 48,940 48,880 Fred Waring Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 21,700 46,073 47,399 47,664 46,187 �y Fred Waring Dr, Eldorado Dr. California Dr. 21,700 45,288 47,022 46,942 45,888 U) Fred Waring Dr. California Dr. Warner Tr, 21,700 44,038 45,475 45,205 44,448 1 Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. Washington St. 21,700 53,138 54,770 53,278 53,881 co Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 19,900 33,937 35,240 34,773 34,358 SR-111 Bob Hope Dr. Parkview Dr, 42,100 67,247 68,587 69,054 69,078 SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 36,700 59,582 60,584 60,419 60,861 SR-111 Fred Waring Dr, Desert Crossing 32,700 40,403 40,966 40,957 41,609 SR-111 Desert Crossing El Paseo/Town Center W . 34,500 41,047 41,620 41,613 42,264 SR-111 El Paseo/Town Center W . Plaza W . 23,700 36,991 37,052 37,092 37,641 SR-111 Plaza W . Monterey Av. 28,400 38,903 39,065 39,216 39,654 SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. 30,000 46,410 47,173 47,395 47,948 SR-111 San Pablo Av. San Luis Rey Av. 27,900 48,066 48,670 48,979 49,561 SR-111 San Luis Rey Av. Portola Av. 32,900 50,948 52,079 52,238 52,971 SR-111 Portola Av. El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 32,000 49,056 49,077 49,111 50,009 SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 40,800 59,209 60,393 60,469 61,698 SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 30,400 59,114 60,212 60,406 61,516 SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St, 30,500 60,833 62,028 62,223 63,386 SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 31,800 64,077 65,813 66,080 66,823 SR-111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. 35,000 70,426 72,030 72,457 73,274 Mesa View Dr. SR-74 Portola Av. 3,500 3,500 3,703 3,715 3,766 Haystack Rd. SR-74 Portola Av. - 929 964 918 958 Av.42 Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. 2,292 3,596 3,705 3,601 Hovley Ln.West Monterey Av. Portola Av. 2,026 2,445 2,467 2,365 35th Av. Unnamed Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. - 15,177 14,089 12,778 13,379 Lucas Way Dinah Shore Dr. 135th Av. 3,930 1 3,777 3,198 3,229 TABLE ES-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT)SUMMARY DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME EXISTING1 EXISTING LESS MORE ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT GENERAL PLAN I PREFERRED INTENSE INTENSE Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola Chase School Rd. 4,000 30,141 32,039 31.455 32,435 Varner Rd. Chase School Rd. Av.38 3,500 30,359 37,399 36,358 37,852 Varner Rd. Av. 38 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washington 3,500 5,320 6,341 6,269 6,400 Varner Rd. 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washington Washington St. 6,300 13,330 14,919 14,845 14,970 Varner Rd. Washington St. 1-10 WB Rams 14,400 29.322 30,883 30,493 31,431 Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Adams St. 7,000 21,371 22,481 22,107 22,919 1-10 Fw . w/o Bob Hope Dr. Bob Hope Dr. 83,000 208,400 211,000 209,600 210,800 1-10 Fw . Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. 85,000 218,000 221,100 219,400 219,700 1-10 Fw . Monterey Av. Portola Av. 81,000 225,900 229,400 228,700 229,600 1-10 Fw . Portola Av. Cook St. 81,000 232,700 234,900 233,700 235,300 1-10 Fw . Cook St. Washington St. 76,000 227,200 227,800 226,700 229,500 1-10 Fw . Washington St. E/O Washington St. 64,000 202,500 204,700 202,800 205,800 1-10 WB Rams(Washington St. 1-10 Fw . Varner Rd. 10,000 10,000 10,450 10,433 10,559 1-10 ES Rams Bob Hope Dr./Ramon Rd. 1-10 Fw . Bob Hope Dr. - 19,705 19,784 19,696 20,333 I-10 EB Rams Bob Hope Dr./Ramon Rd. Ramon Rd. 1-10 Fw . 7,700 20,056 19,919 19,923 19,353 1-10 EB Rams Bob Hope Dr./Ramon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 Fw . - 8,213 8,651 8,467 8,702 b7 1-10 WB Rams Bob Hope Dr./Ramon Rd. 1-10 Fw . Bob Hope Dr. 22,226 22,495 22,060 22,501 1-10 WB Rams Bob Hope Dr./Ramon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 Fw . - 21,183 21,182 20,960 21,478 I-10 EB Rams(Monterey Av. 1-10 Fw . MontereyAv. 9,100 10,394 9,829 9,485 9,363 I-10 EB Rams(MontereyAv. MontereyAv. 1-10 Fw . 7,100 14,881 14,943 14.636 14,905 1-10 WB Rams(Monterey Av. 1-10 Fw . Varner Rd. 5,900 11,668 10,831 11,459 11,742 1-10 WB Rams(Monterey Av. Monterey Av. 1-10 Fw . 6,700 8,192 7,576 7,399 7,261 1-10 WB On Ram (Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 Fw - 8,892 8,990 8,891 9,013 I-10 EB Rams(Washington St. 1-10 Fw . Washington St. 23,212 1 23,173 23,186 23,401 1-10 EB Rams(Washington St. Washington St. 1-10 Fwy 13,610 14,726 23,316 15,201 1-10 EB Rams Portola Av. 1-10 Fw . Portola Av. 12,731 13,299 12,940 12,832 1-10 EB Rams Portola Av. Portola Av, 1-10 Fwy 11,681 11,287 11,073 11,583 1-10 WB Rams Portola Av. 1-10 Fw . Varner Rd. 15,114 15,057 14,430 14,446 I-10 WB Rams Portola Av. Portola Av. 1-10 Fw - 1,513 1,527 1,522 1,535 1-10 EB Rams Cook St. 1-10 Fw . Cook St. 7,100 11,339 13,292 13,157 13,327 1-10 EB Rams Cook St. Cook St. 1-10 Fw . 3,500 9,212 10,721 10,173 11,064 1-10 WB Rams Cook St.) 1-10 Fw . Cook St. 7,700 8,598 9,996 9,333 10,202 1-10 WB Rams Cook St. Cook St. 1-10 Fw . 2,500 4,196 5,031 4,666 5.278 Country Club Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 28,800 30,031 33,380 32,328 33,449 Country Club Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 18,700 20,253 25,025 24,567 25,411 Country Club Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 21,200 25,980 28,421 28,467 29,111 Country Club Dr, Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 21,500 28,901 33,705 34,072 35,329 Country Club Dr, Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 20,200 21,468 24,956 25,207 26,659 Country Club Dr, Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 31,700 35,083 39,771 39,784 40,697 Count Club Dr. Washin ton St. Av.42 19,300 23,823 25,522 25,374 26,738 Hovle Ln. E. Portola Av. Cook St. 14,200 17,578 17,957 17,761 TABLE ES-2 (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) SUMMARY DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME EXISTING EXISTING LESS MORE ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT GENERAL PLAN PREFERRED INTENSE INTENS Bob Hope Dr, Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramps 61,442 61,475 61,571 62,650 Varner Rd. Ramon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. - 26,262 26,878 26,405 27,241 Varner Rd, Monterey Av. Ramon Rd. 23,606 23,216 22,981 24,178 Monterey Av. Varner Rd. Ramon Rd. 32,553 34,280 33,426 35,354 35th Av. Monterey Av. Lucas Wy. - 12,774 11,634 10,642 10,933 Portola Av. Spine Rd. Frank Sinatra Dr. 5,200 31,915 34,101 33,830 33,936 Spine Rd. Portola Av. Cook St. - 1.439 2,363 2,268 2,285 Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. Sine Rd. 16,700 52,471 58,127 56,070 58,732:]1 U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]TES-2 t�J I O TABLE ES-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC(ADT)SUMMARY DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME EXISTING1 EXISTING LESS MORE ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT GENERAL PLAN PREFERRED INTENSE INTENSE Unnamed Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 6,391 4,560 3,598 3,665 California Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. - 1,197 1,454 1,646 1,385 Warner Tr. Av.of the States Fred Waring Dr. - 8,659 8,951 8,651 9,242 Bob Hope Dr. 18th Av. 20th Av. - 5,869 6,063 6,047 6,029 Bob Hope Dr. 20th Av. 22nd Av. - 7,779 8,462 8,364 8,373 Bob Hope Dr. 22nd Av. 30th Av. 7,004 8,194 8,093 8,258 Dillon Rd. 18th Av. Dowell Ln. - 1,916 2,450 2,352 2,427 20th Av. Bob Hope Dr. Dowell Ln. - 2,115 2,802 2,707 2,772 22nd Av. Bob Hope Dr. Dowell Ln. - 119 600 603 763 Dowell Ln. 20th Av. 22nd Av. - 405 658 584 661 Dillon Rd. 20th Av. Dowell Ln. - 1,937 2,416 2,281 2,375 20th Av, Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. - 1,702 2,150 2,131 2,109 22nd Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. - 64 161 148 182 Dillon Rd. 20th Av. 22nd Av. - 2,629 3,257 3,133 3,251 Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Hovley Ln. E. - 1,816 2,582 2,089 2,594 Dillon Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. e/o Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. - 1,237 1,506 1,486 1,511 Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. n/o Dillon Rd. - 86 510 429 484 to Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. Dillon Rd. - 1,616 2,594 2,427 2,635 1 Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. s/o 26th Av. - 2,757 4,363 4,146 4,446 26th Av. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. - 1,140 1,319 1,286 1,359 Dillon Rd. w/o Bob Hope Dr. Ext. Bob Hope Dr. Ext. - 3,212 3,651 3,557 3,617 Dillon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. 18th Av. - 1,296 1,695 1,639 1,693 Warner Tr. Hovley Ln. E. California Dr. - 1 9,278 9,814 9,504 10,037 18th Av. Bob Hope Dr. w/o Bob Hope Dr. - 5,030 5,200 5,159 5,120 18th Av. Bob Hope Dr. Dillon Rd. - 620 754 712 735 20th Av, Bob Hope Dr. w/o Bob Hope Dr. - 768 960 936 969 30th Av. Bob Hope Dr. w/o Bob Hope Dr. - 2,631 2,887 2,891 2,873 Unnamed Rd. Bob Hope Dr. e/o Bob Hope Dr. - 22,108 21,958 21,913 22,360 Monterey Av. Ramon Rd. Unnamed Rd. - 16,105 17,092 15,905 18,549 Ramon Rd. Chase School Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 6,600 7,870 9,553 8,701 10,779 Ramon Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. e/o Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. - 7,978 9,491 8,638 10,775 Washington St. Av.38 n/o Av. 38 - 13,146 15,013 14,298 16,322 Dowell Ln. 20th Av. Dillon Rd. 405 658 584 661 Bob Hope Dr. 18th Av. Dillon Rd. - 2,044 2,183 2,174 2,196 Bob Hope Dr. 30th Av. s/o 30th Av. - 13,876 15,194 15,063 15,294 Bob Hope Dr. Unnamed Rd. n/o Unnamed Rd. - 33,928 35,265 34,927 35,623 Bob Hope Dr. Unnamed Rd. s/o Unnamed Rd. - 54,680 55,591 55,265 56,302 TABLE ES-3 (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY VOLUME THRESHOLDS VOLUME/CAPACITY EXISTING LESS MORE ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO LOS"C" LOS"D" CAPACITY GENERAL PLAN PREFERRED INTENSE INTENSE Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. CountryClub Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.79 0.89 0.88 0.91 Cook St, Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.87 0.99 0.98 0.99 Cook St. Hovley Ln.E. Fred Waring Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.66 0.72 0.74 0.72 Cook St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.63 0.69 0.68 0,69 Cook St. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 Emerald Desert Dr. Kalahari Desert Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.16 Eldorado Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 Eldorado Dr, Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln, E. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.22 Via Toscana Hovley Ln. E. Pisa 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.21 Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.19 Eldorado Dr. SR-111 Fairway Dr, 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.28 0.30 0.30 1 0.30 Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. Ramon Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.09 Oasis Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln, E. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.16 0.20 0.19 0.21 Washington St. Av. 38 Varner Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.1.9 1.21 1.16 1.24 Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.34 1.40 1.36 1.42 M Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.37 1.44 1.42 1.46 En Washington St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln, E. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.80 0.84 0.82 0.86 Washington St. Hovley Ln.E. Fred Warinq Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.83 0.87 0.87 0.88 N Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 42.000 48,000 52,000 0.87 0.90 0.89 0.91 Dillon Rd. Hot S rin s Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.07 Ramon Rd. Bob Hoe Dr. 1-10 EB Rams 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.93 Ramon Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 1-10 WB Rams 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.53 0.55 0.54 0.58 Ramon Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Varner Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.53 0.55 0.54 0.58 Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. Chase School Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.20 0.30 0.27 0.39 Dinah Shore Dr, Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.91 Dinah Shore Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 1.11 1.16 1.10 1.11 Gerald Ford Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.75 0.77 0.73 0.76 Gerald Ford Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.78 0.84 0.80 0.83 Gerald Ford Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.64 0,66 0.66 0.66 Gerald Ford Dr. Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.37 0.51 0.46 0.50 Frank Sinatra Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.76 0.78 0.81 0.80 Frank Sinatra Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.50 0.53 0.53 0.55 Frank Sinatra Dr Portola Av. Cook St. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.44 0.50 0.48 0.52 Frank Sinatra Dr. Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.14 Frank Sinatra Dr Gerald Ford Dr, Eldorado Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.30 0.34 0.32 0.33 Av. 38 Varner Rd. Washington St. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.84 0.77 0.71 0.79 Tamarisk Row Dr. Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0A1 0.47 0.45 0.46 Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.96 0.91 0.95 0.97 Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey Portola Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.55 0.54 0.55 0.56 Varner Rd. Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola 26,000 29,000 32,000 1.34 1.40 1.36 1.39 Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola Chase School Rd. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.94 1.00 0.98 1.01 Varner Rd. lChase School Rd. Av. 38 26,000 29,000 32,000 0,95 1.17 1.14 1,18 TABLE ES-3 PALM DESERT VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY VOLUME THRESHOLDS VOLUME/CAPACITY EXISTING LESS I MORE ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO LOS"C" LOS"D" CAPACITY GENERAL PLAN PREFERRED INTENSE1 INTENSE Desert Crossing north of SR-111 SR-111 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.11 0.11 0.11 0,11 Desert Crossing SR-111 south of SR-111 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 Town Center W . Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.26 El Paseo SR-111 Plaza W . 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.26 0.28 0.28 0.28 El Paseo SR-111 Portola Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.22 Plaza W . Shopping Center SR-111 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Monterey Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.89 0.91 0.89 0.93 Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.02 1.03 1.01 1.04 Monterey Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.22 1.25 1.20 1.24 Monterey Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr, 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.77 0.81 0.81 0.82 Monterey Av, Gerald Ford Or, Frank Sinatra Dr, 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.60 0.63 0.62 0.65 Monterey Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.59 0.64 0.63 0.67 Monterey Av. Country Club Dr. Parkview Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.69 0.75 0.74 0.76 Monterey Av. Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.58 0.62 0.63 0.63 Monterey Av. Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.53 0.57 0.58 0.57 Monterey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 26,000 29,000 32,000 1.17 1.22 1.23 1.22 College of the Desert north of Fred Waring Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.32 tTJ College of the Desert Fred Waring Dr. south of Fred Waring Dr. 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.07 i San Pablo Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.32 San Pablo Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.35 0.40 0.40 0.40 San Pablo Av, SR-111 El Paseo 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.18 0.20 0.19 0.20 San Luis Rey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.47 0.49 0.48 0.48 Portola Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 26,000 29,000 32,000 1.03 1.08 1.03 1.08 Portola Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 26,000 29,000 32,000 1.17 1.22 1.16 1.22 Portola Av. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 1.48 1.51 1.45 1.50 Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr, 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.91 0.97 0.94 0.96 Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 1.17 1.23 1.22 1.23 Portola Av, Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.92 0.98 0.96 0.97 Portola Av. Hovley Ln. E. Magnesia Falls Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.85 0.89 0.87 0.88 Portola Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.70 0.76 0.73 0.75 Portola Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.74 0.76 0.75 0.76 Portola Av, SR-111 El Paseo 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.41 0.40 0.41 0,40 Deep Canyon Rd. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Warinq Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.62 0.61 0.61 0.61 Deep Canyon Rd. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.71 0.73 0.72 0.73 Deep Canyon Rd. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Hospitality Dr. north of SR-111 SR-111 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 Hospitality Dr. SR-111 south of SR-111 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 Chase School Rd. Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.39 0.59 0.44 0.67 Chase School Rd. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.65 0.89 0.79 0.94 Cook St. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.79 0.99 0.92 1.02 Cook St. 1-10 EB Rams lGerald Ford Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.01 1.19 1.14 1,21 Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. IFrank Sinatra Dr. 42.000 48,000 52,000 1.03 1 1.17 1.13 1.17 TABLE ES-3(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY VOLUME THRESHOLDS VOLUME/CAPACITY EXISTING LESS MORE ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO LOS"C" LOS"D" CAPACITY GENERAL PLAN PREFERRED INTENSE INTENSE SR-111 El Paseo/Town Center W . Plaza W . 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.71 0.71 0.71 6.72 SR-111 Plaza W . Monterey Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.76 SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.92 SR-111 San Pablo Av. San Luis Rey Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.92 0.94 0:94 0.95 SR-111 San Luis Rey Av. Portola Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.02 SR-111 Portola Av. El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.96 SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.19 SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.18 SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.17 1.19 1.20 1.22 SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.23 1.27 1.27 1.29 SR-111 Eldorado Dr, Miles Av, 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.35 1.39 1.39 1.41 Mesa View Dr. SR-74 Portola Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 Haystack Rd. SR-74 Portola Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 42nd Av. Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.07 0.11 0.12 0.11 Hovle Ln. West MontereyAv. Portola Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.07 35th Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Unnamed Rd. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.47 0.44 0.40 0.42 C� Lucas WayDinah Shore Dr, 35th Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.10 Unnamed Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.20 0.14 0.11 0.11 ,t California Dr, Fred WaringDr. Warner Tr. 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.10 Warner Tr. Av.of the States Fred Waring Dr. 10,000 12,000 52,000 0.62 0.64 0.62 0.66 Bob Hope Dr. 18th Av, 20th Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.19 Bob Hope Dr. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.26 Bob Hope Dr. 22nd Av. 30th Av. 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.50 0.59 0.58 0.59 Dillon Rd. 18th Av. Dowell Ln. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 20th Av. Bob Hope Dr. Dowell Ln. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.07 0.09 0.08 0.09 22nd Av. Bob Hope Dr. Dowell Ln. 26,000 29,000 32,000 - 0.02 0.02 0.02 Dowell Ln. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 Dillon Rd. 20th Av. Dowell Ln. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.05 20th Av. Dowell Ln, Dillon Rd. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.07 22nd Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 26,000 29,000 32,000 - 0.01 - 0.01 Dillon Rd. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.05 0.06 0,06 0.06 Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.05 Dillon Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. n/o Dillon Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0,02 0.03 0.03 0,03 Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. e/o Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26,000 29,000 32,000 - 0.02 0.01 0.02 Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. IDillon Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.05 Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. s/o 26th Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.05 0.08 0.08 0,09 26th Av. IThousand Palms Canyon Rd. e/o Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 U:\UcJobs\00055\del\030829\[TABLES.xis]SumVC TABLE ES-3(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY VOLUME THRESHOLDS VOLUME/CAPACITY EXISTING LESS MORE ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO LOS"C" LOS"D" CAPACITY GENERAL PLAN PREFERRED INTENSEI INTENSE Varner Rd. Av. 38 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washington 26,000 29.000 32,000 0.17 0.20 0.20 0.20 Varner Rd. 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washington Washington St. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.42 0.47 0.46 0.47 Varner Rd. Washington St. 1-10 WB Rams 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.92 0.97 0.95 0.98 Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Adams St. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.67 0.70 0.69 0.72 1-10 Fw . w/o Bob Hoe Dr. Bob Hope Dr. 128,400 144,450 160,500 1,30 1.31 1.31 1.31 1-10 Fw . Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. 128,400 144,450 160,500 1.36 1.38 1.37 1.37 1-10 Fw . Monterey Av. Portola Av. 128,400 144,450 160,500 1.41 1.43 1.42 1.43 1-10 Fw . Portola Av. Cook St. 128,400 144,450 160,500 1.45 1.46 1.46 1.47 1-10 Fw . Cook St. Washington St. 128,400 144,450 160,500 1.42 1.42 1.41 1.43 1-10 Fw . Washington St. E/O Washington St. 128,400 144,450 160,500 1.26 1.28 1.26 1.28 Country Club Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.58 0.64 0.62 0.64 Country Club Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 42,000 48,000 52.000 0.39 0.48 0.47 0.49 Country Club Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.50 0.55 0.55 0.56 Country Club Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.56 0.65 0.66 0.68 Country Club Dr, Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.41 0.48 0.48 0.51 Country Club Dr. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.67 0.76 0.77 0.78 M Country Club Dr. Washington St. Av.42 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.74 0.80 0.79 0.84 i Hovley Ln, E. Portola Av. Cook St. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.44 0.55 0.56 0.56 Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.64 0.71 0.70 0.72 w Hovley Ln, E, Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.75 0.85 0.84 0.85 Hovley Ln. E. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.52 0.59 0.60 0.59 Av.42 Washington St. Adams St. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.72 0.81 0.80 0.82 Magnesia Falls Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.18 0.21 0.21 0.22 Magnesia Falls Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.10 Painters Path Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 10,000 12,000 14,000 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Parkview Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.28 0.30 0.32 0.31 Parkview Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert 26,000 29,000 32,000 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.45 0.47 0.47 0.47 Fred Waring Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.72 0.75 0.75 0.74 Fred Waring Dr. College of the Desert San Pablo Av, 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.73 0.75 0.76 0,75 Fred Waring Dr. San Pablo Av. Portola Av. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.76 0.79 0.78 0.78 Fred Waring Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.72 0.76 0.75 0.74 Fred Waring Dr. Deep Canyon Rd. Cook St. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.92 0.96 0.94 0.94 Fred Waring Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.89 0.91 0.92 0.89 Fred Waring Dr. Eldorado Dr. California Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.87 0.90 0.90 0.88 Fred Waring Dr. California Dr. Warner Tr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.85 Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. Washington St. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.02 1.05 1.02 1.04 Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 26,000 29,000 32,000 1.06 1.10 1.09 1.07 SR-111 Bob Hope Dr. I Parkview Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.29 1.32 1.33 1.33 SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 42,000 48,000 52,000 1.15 1.17 1.16 1.17 SR-111 Fred Waring Dr. Desert Crossing 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.78 0.79 0.79 0.80 SR-111 Desert Crossing El Paseo/Town Center W . 42,000 48,000 52,000 0.79 0.80 0.80 0.81 TABLE ES-4 COMPARISON OF DEFICIENT STUDY AREA ROADWAYS LEVEL OF NUMBER OF DEFICIENCIES BY ALTERNATIVE SERVICE EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PREFERRED LESS INTENSE MORE INTENSE D 12 13 14 12 E 10 12 11 15 F 20 23 22 24 Total E AND F 30 35 33 39 Total D, E, AND F 42 48 47 51 U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]TES-4 ES-15 EXHIBIT ES-A RECOMMENDED CITY OF PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT AV.1V Av.a �qv R �j �■ Oj �■ FRED WANING OR. <1 ¢ Si Av.x W W 3 ■ r "yy ■ d F3 : � ■ A • SRItI INSET A • €i313€0--- - __• z 4` RAWN RD. ■ g GERAID FORD w �SS■ L O S• x gi A• FRAW SA ATM DR ■ ■■11YIB■■■ LEGEND s S =ARTERIAL A ■■■■■■■■ =MAJOR THOROUGHFARE =SECONDARY QA1°OR ^_ -^_-_---- SECONDARY(SCENIC) v ■ i(• 6 =COLLECTOR • �• w• � g■ x ��/■■■ ■■■■■i/■■■ ■■3 • V.OF • ¢ STATES MAGNESN FALLS _ Syj �IFDRNIAe C FFED WANNG M ; a! SEE INSET A Wi SRllf 1 • �• I �• sAVEWDa� • 1 PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert, Califomia-00055:RecGP2 URBAN ES-16 EXHIBIT ES-B CITY OF PALM DESERT RECOMMENDED ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS 60-56�R,W + 49-367 R/W q • o • y COLLECTOR STREET tW RIW w,w -tr >o# STWPED � �� MEDUH SECONDARY ROADWAY OB'RN/ a8l Rw ? Yl 4ir 1 I I it I K n so SCENIC SECONDARY ROADWAY t2V R/W ,W FM `L iT tr an 1 MA 1nR_T}iOEbUGHFARE t 1 7 FI! t p* / E ARTERIAL, STREET 11 W-174•tt/w► 134'H/w t Y •' 12' 12' 14' 9' 9' 14, 12. t 2 B E ARTERIAL STREET SCENIC EASEMENT (VARIABLE), WHERE APPROPRIATE. PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL, Palm Desert,California-00055:120 URBAN ES-17 Peak hour intersection analysis has been performed at key intersection locations for the Preferred scenario only. Based on the relatively small variations in daily traffic volumes, the results of the peak hour analysis is generally applicable to all of the land use alternatives. Traffic signals are warranted at all key intersection analysis locations in the Buildout (Post-2020) condition. Intersection configurations for the Preferred scenario with improvements to Level of Service "C" or "D" are included in the analysis separately. With planned or typical General Plan improvements, most intersection analysis locations operate at Level of Service "D" or better. Table ES-5 lists improvements necessary to achieve LOS "D" at study area intersections. The only locations which need to be improved beyond planned levels per the Circulation Element or specific direction from the City Engineer for LOS "D" conditions are the East leg of SR-111 (NS) at Fred Waring Drive (EW), Washington Street (NS) at the 1-10 Eastbound ramps (EW), Washington Street (NS) at Fred Waring Drive (EW), and Bob Hope Drive (NS) at the 1-10 Interchange (EW). To attain level of service "C", additional improvements are necessary at a number of locations. Table ES-6 summarizes these additional LOS "C" improvements. To achieve LOS "C" peak hour operations, additional through lanes are necessary at the following intersections: • westbound on Fred Waring Drive (4th westbound through lane) at Cook Street • westbound on Dinah Shore Drive (3rd westbound through lane) at Monterey Avenue • southbound on Washington Street (4th southbound through lane) at Country Club Drive • northbound on Washington Street (4th northbound through lane shared with right turn lane) at 1-10 EB ramps Other improvements occur at interchanges (a free right turn lane leaving the freeway at Cook Street (NS) and 1-10 EB Ramps (EW), and additional lanes at Bob Hope Drive at the I-10 Interchange). At the intersection of SR-111 (NS) and Fred Waring Drive (EW), ES-18 TABLE ES-5 ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" INTERSECTION RECOMMENDED ACTION/ IMPROVEMENT Bob Hope Dr. (NS) & 1-10 WB Ramps (EW) Construct 2nd NB Left Turn Lane, Construct 2nd WB Right Turn Lane SR-111 (NS)& Fred Waring Dr. (EW) Restripe WB Through Lane to exclusive Right Turn Lane and provide Right Turn Overlap Phase Arrow Washington St. NS & 1-10 EB Rams EW Convert 2 EB Right Turn Lanes into a Free Right Turn Lane Washington St. NS & Fred Warin Dr. EW Provide EB Ri ht Turn Overlap Phase U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xis]TES-5 ES-19 TABLE ES-6 ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE LEVEL OF SERVICE "C" INTERSECTION RECOMMENDED ACTION/IMPROVEMENT Bob Hope Dr. (NS)& 1-10 WB Ramps (EW) Construct WB Free Right Turn Lane (instead of the 2nd Right Turn Lane required to achieve LOS "D"operations) Bob Hope Dr. NS & 1-10 EB Ramps E Construct 2nd SB Left Turn Lane SR-111 (NS)& Fred Waring Dr. (EW) Convert the separate WB Right Turn required for LOS"D"conditions to a Free Right Turn Lane Monterey Av. (NS) & Dinah Shore Dr. (EW) Provide EB Right Turn Overlap Phase(Arrow) and construct 3rd WB Through Lane and EITHER prevent North Leg Pedestrian movements and convert 3rd EB Left Turn Lane into 3rd EB Through Lane OR Prevent West Leg pedestrian movements. Cook St. (NS) & 1-10 EB Ramps(EW) Convert EB conventional Right Turn Lane to an EB Free Right Turn Lane and prohibit North Leg pedestrian movements Cook St. (NS) &Gerald Ford Dr. (EW) Provide Right Turn Overlap Phase(Arrows)for both SB and WB Ri ht Turns Cook St. NS & Frank Sinatra Dr. E Prohibit North Leg Pedestrian Movements Cook St. NS & Hovley Lane East E Provide WB Right Turn Overlap Phase Arrow Cook St.(NS)& Fred Waring Dr. (EW) Construct 4th WB Through Lane and Prohibit East Leg Pedestrian movements Cook St. NS & SR-111 EW Prohibit East Leg Pedestrian Movements Oasis Club Dr. NS & Country Club Dr. EW Prohibit East Leg Pedestrian Movements Washington St. NS &Varner Rd. EW Provide EB Right Turn Overlap Phase Arrow Washington St. NS & 1-10 EB Rams EW Construct NB 4th Shared Through-Right Lane Washington St. (NS)& Country Club Dr. (EW) Construct 4th SB Through Lane, Provide WB Right Turn Overlap Phase Arrow Washington St. (NS)&Fred Waring Dr. (EW) Convert EB conventional Right Turn Lane to a Free Right Turn Lane and Prohibit West Leg Pedestrian Movements U:\U cJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xis]TES-6 ES-20 the separate right turn lane required for LOS "D" conditions must be a free right turn lane to obtain LOS "C" conditions. A special case is Monterey Avenue at Dinah Shore Drive. Urban Crossroads, Inc. staff has been informed that Dinah Shore east of Monterey is only a 4D (secondary), while the General Plan indicates a 6D (Arterial) roadway. With the increase in land use intensity for the preferred alternative in the "mid-district" (between Frank Sinatra Drive and the 1-10 Freeway), combined with intensified development along the north side of the 1-10 Freeway and increased through traffic on the freeway per the regional model, 3 through lanes (6D) is required at this intersection to achieve LOS "C" (but not LOS "D"). Another special issue that has been addressed in this analysis is the need for a new freeway interchange and overpass at Portola Parkway. New daily roadway segment analysis has been completed to evaluate the change in daily traffic volumes and operations for the Preferred Alternative with and without the proposed Portola Parkway interchange. Recently completed peak hour analysis that was performed in conjunction with the Desert Gateway project has also been included in the General Plan traffic study. Based on the analysis, the Portola Parkway interchange is needed to avoid potentially unacceptable traffic conditions at both the Monterey Avenue and the Cook Street interchanges with the 1-10 Freeway. ES-21 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ES-22 j ,` 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 1.1 Introduction This traffic study has been prepared in support of the 2003 Update of the City of Palm Desert General Plan and Circulation Element. The Circulation Element emphasizes the upgrade and maintenance of a transportation system for the City that responds to the demands of the current and planned land uses, as set forth in the Land Use Element. Four alternative land use scenarios are evaluated with respect to daily traffic volumes. Additionally, peak hour intersection analysis has been performed for the Preferred scenario. Special issues are evaluated, including the future potential 1-10 Freeway interchange at Portola Avenue, and alternative travel modes. This study identifies improvements required to maintain the City of Palm Desert desired service levels throughout the City for each scenario. The project location is depicted on Exhibit 1-A. The study area evaluated in the analysis section of this report is presented on Exhibit 1-B. The City of Palm Desert has a circulation system consisting of arterial roadways and local streets. State Route (SR-)111, Interstate (I-)10 Freeway, and SR-74 (Monterey Avenue) provide regional access to the city. Established transit service also connects the City to the nearby communities. For vehicular transportation, a hierarchical roadway network is established with designated roadway types and design standards. The roadway type is linked to anticipated traffic levels. As growth within the City occurs, capacity analysis should be performed and improvements made to the roadway system. Because local circulation is linked with the regional system, the Circulation Element also focuses on participation in regional programs to alleviate traffic congestion and construct capacity improvements. 1-1 EXHIBIT 1-A LOCATION MAP DESERT-HO.T-SPRINGS s- Tk CATHEDRAL CIII - PALM SPRINGS RANCHO MIRAGE - PALM,DESER- 1.4 INDIAN_. � ;- WELLS COACHELLA -- LA QUINTA L_ egend ® = STUDY AREA 0 2 4 8Mdes PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,Califomia-00055Area URBAN CROSSROA9S 1 -2 EXHIBIT 1-13 a STUDY AREA AV.A AV v�cx�w Ort EaEJ v Aft 6 m i ♦v.a if o i U Et vnsEo i INSET A aa.,oro� o 0 DI/WISHCPE D0. - 8 k yU w GERALD M 3 O 3 DH W J! ly * 8 d V 8 � RIO couwt V C m DR - MOVLEV NPLFY - 3 v OF TW STATES rwG�esn s+.L_s�n A-0�- � F D V .GDR SEE INSET A sa„ WSYIinLm 00. LEGEND: 0 =INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATION !UVSTACN lL L.Es�viEw Da PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY,Palm Desert,California-00055:StudyArea URBAF 1 -3 Plans prepared by Caltrans, the County and other regional agencies guide development/improvement of the regional transportation system. Strategies to handle anticipated traffic levels from future regional development are currently being developed as discussed hereafter. 1.2 Forecasting Procedures A separate PDTM model run was prepared for each land use scenario evaluated in this traffic study report. The daily traffic volume forecasts for this study effort have been prepared using the Palm Desert Traffic Model (PDTM). The PDTM traffic forecasting tool has been developed in accordance with regional consistency requirements and has obtained the required finding of consistency from the Riverside County Transportation Commission. Inputs to the PDTM include trip generation from the regional Coachella Valley (CVATS) Model, the City of Palm Desert General Plan roadway network, and the City of Palm Desert land use in coordination with trip generation rates as documented in the Palm Desert Traffic Model (PDTM) Model Documentation (RKJK, January, 2001). The PDTM has been updated in the course of this work effort to reflect the most current CVATS model data. The Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) structure has been refined to provide more detail, and to allow for better traffic loading onto the roadway network. The updated TAZ structure is shown on Exhibit 1-C. The PDTM is based on the traditional forecasting procedure that includes: • Trip Generation • Trip Distribution • Traffic Assignment The PDTM is not intended to deal with issues related to mode choice and as such includes no explicit mode choice step in the forecasting process. Trip generation may be conservative in areas where above average transit service is provided, or where the mix of urban land uses has been developed in conjunction 1-4 EXHIBIT 1-C 478 PALM DESERT TAZ STRUCTURE 475 494 495 482 480 481 479 477 171 505 504 501 471 483 475 500 4T[ 466 8/5 511 4 1 514 473 aio A7� 512 844 469 ONRO 467 463 843 518 487 515 953 497 458 go 833 `� 52E 529 469 488 B50 499 846 852 869 490 464 545 847 544 S39 492 491 488 484 E3$ 406 555 553 554 5� gSy7N° INSET AI W2 SEE 5,9 INSET Bc INSET A 529 sa3 B35 534 2 5489550551572 571 570 W1 6 5<�f'613 599 584 OSeo610 O 842 576 SEE 816 608D 606 81582636 633 COUNTRY UB DR INSET B 629630 m BJ7 65J 6O657O 674689 496 75 O 691 6688 657 685 sm 0 702 D 712 830 700 721 659 660 656 655 SEE INSET C INSET C 731 698 708 711 817 818 820 717 )15 716 714 459 92J 822 828 519 719 718 729 837 D76 737 736 T32 730 733 827 ? 821 755 754 749 750 751 752 745 746 753 279 761 759 758 763 762 756 768 765 1. 767 462 771 77B 779 786 787 788 789 769 795 794 793 792 790 785 466 802 799 798 800 Doi 796 797 807 811 809 808 t PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert, Califomia-00055:94 1 -S with pedestrian facilities to reduce dependence on the automobile. The PDTM implicitly relies on the regional travel demand tool and the data obtained from this tool and included in the PDTM to account for regional mode choice characteristics. 1.3 Land Use Data Land use data has been provided by AIS to Urban Crossroads, Inc. for use in evaluating General Plan alternatives. The City of Palm Desert Sphere of Influence has been divided into three districts for the purpose of this analysis. The north district includes everything in the Sphere of Influence north of the 1-10 Freeway. The mid district spans south of the 1-10 freeway to Frank Sinatra Drive. The south district contains everything south of Frank Sinatra Drive. In the Chapters that follow, each alternative is discussed in more detail and compared to other alternatives. 1.4 Forecast Refinement Procedure The PDTM provides raw daily traffic volume forecasts for each scenario. The Currently Adopted General Plan raw volumes are compared to existing daily traffic counts. For each instance where the future volume is less than existing (negative growth), the raw future volume is adjusted (increased) to match the existing counted volume. At locations where negative growth was eliminated in the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario, the same increase over raw future model volume is applied to each of the other three scenarios. This process shows the change in volume at each location due to land use differences, but does allow some minor decreases in volume at certain locations for the three alternative land use scenarios. Future turning movement forecasts are extracted from the model at each of the 54 key intersection analysis locations for the Preferred scenario. At each 1-6 intersection, volumes decreases from existing counts are eliminated. Forecasts are reviewed for reasonableness, and minor adjustments are made as necessary. 1.5 Analysis Criteria The evaluation criteria used to develop the recommended General Plan Circulation Element are based on the daily traffic volumes and volume to capacity (V/C) ratios. The V/C ratios are generally based on Capacity values utilized by the City of Palm Desert for planning purposes. Current guidelines state that a V/C ratio of 0.80 represents the acceptable limit of daily traffic (e.g., LOS "C") pursuant to the currently adopted General Plan Circulation Element for study area roadways. This criterion will be evaluated with respect to forecast volumes to determine if undesirable roadway widths (e.g. widening that impacts existing homes or other existing development) are required, and LOS "D" should be deemed acceptable (as it is in several other jurisdictions). Intersection analysis is presented for existing conditions, and for the Preferred scenario. The Preferred scenario intersection analysis is evaluated to provide future intersection lane configuration recommendations. The current technical guide to the evaluation of traffic operations is the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Transportation Research Board Special Report 209). The HCM defines level of service as a qualitative measure which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The criteria used to evaluate LOS (Level of Service) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. 1-7 The definitions of level of service for uninterrupted flow (flow unrestrained by the existence of traffic control devices) are: • LOS "A" represents free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. • LOS "B" is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver. • LOS "C" is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. • LOS "D" represents high-density but stable flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. • LOS "E" represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Small increases in flow will cause breakdowns in traffic movement. • LOS "F" is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. The definitions of level of service for interrupted traffic flow (flow restrained by the existence of traffic signals and other traffic control devices) differ slightly depending on the type of traffic control. 1-8 The level of service is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The HCM methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The levels of service determined in this study are determined using the HCM methodology. No peak hour factor has been applied in this analysis. The reason the peak hour factor is not applied is because the level of service standard for the City of Palm Desert is based on peak hour conditions. The peak hour factor is intended for use in traffic operations (timing of signals, etc.) to accommodate a peak 15 minute flow condition. It is not appropriate for use in planning analysis where the basis for determining project impact is overall peak hour conditions. For signalized intersections, average total delay per vehicle for the overall intersection is used to determine level of service. Levels of service at the signalized study area intersection has been evaluated using an HCM intersection analysis program. For all way stop (AWS) controlled intersections, the ability of vehicles to enter the intersection is not controlled by the occurrence of gaps in the flow of the main street. The AWS controlled intersection has been evaluated using the HCM methodology for this type of multi-way stop controlled intersection configuration. The level of service criteria for this type of intersection analysis is also based on average total delay per vehicle for the overall intersection. The study area intersections, which are currently stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only, have been analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For these intersections, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at the study area location, the level of service has been 1-9 calculated. The level of service criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle for the worst minor street movement(s). The level of services are defined for the various analysis methodologies as follows: AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY PER VEHICLE (SECONDS) LEVEL OF SERVICE SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED A 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 B 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 C 20.01 to 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 D 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 E 55.01 to 80.00 35.01 to 50.00 F 80.01 and up 50.01 and up 1-10 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS This section of the traffic study report describes the existing roadway features, daily traffic volumes, and currently adopted General Plan Circulation Element and roadway standard cross-sections. 2.1 Existing Roadway Characteristics Exhibit 2-A summarizes the existing roadway cross-sections within the study area. Existing roadway cross-sections within the City of Palm Desert range from two lane undivided roadways in less developed areas to 6 lane divided facilities in already developed areas of the City. Monterey Avenue is a four (4) lane divided roadway in the study area except for the segments between Strada Nova and Country Club Drive, and Magnesia Falls Drive and Fred Waring Drive where it is a six (6) lane divided roadway, and south of Gerald Ford Drive where it is a three (3) lane divided roadway. San Pablo Avenue is a four (4) lane divided roadway except for the segment just south of Magnesia Falls Drive where it is a two (2) lane undivided roadway. Portola Avenue is a four (4) lane divided roadway in the study area except for the segment between Haystack Road and Mesa View Drive that is a two (2) lane divided roadway. A segment south of Mockingbird Trail is a three (3) lane divided roadway. Cook Street in the study area is a four (4) lane divided roadway except for the segment north of Gerald Ford Drive which is a five (5) lane divided roadway. Eldorado Drive is a four (4) lane divided roadway for the segment between Frank Sinatra Drive and Hovley Lane East. 2-1 EXHIBIT 2-A EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES J2'. 2f� � << �o 4D4DRAMON RD. 4D 2U 21J 2U O it o,� j 6D LEGEND: 1 6 4 =NUMBER OF LANES 2U 2U U =UNDIVIDED h =DIVIDED o 4D �9~F9� 2U D.._ =CITY LIMIT Z s i 5D GERALD FORD DR 4D 4D 2D Q 5 5D w z 4D 4D ° 2U 2U 4D i I FRANK SINATRA DR. 2U AV.38 4D Q j 4D 4D 4D rye 4D 6D j 4D d 2U 4D h 4D °9 o g4D Lo D O I COUNTRY CLUB DR 6D 4D 4D 4D 4D 4D 4D a HOVLEY LN.WEST o r 2D 4D i 4D 4D u 4D ° 6D HOVLEY LN.EAST °' z a 4D ° 3 4D 2D I 4D 4D 4 4D 1 I 1 2D I AV,OF THE 4D STATES MAGNESIA FALLS DR 2D j ! Q 6D I Q D i 1 urORNIA e�2U a 2U i I 4D FRED wARING DR 3D I 4D SEE INSET A w 3D !2D 4D (4D 0 i 4D SR 111 i D 4D 4D 4D 4D I 2U 1 HOSPITALRY DR i 4D 5 4D 2U < '< ! e o D PARKVIEW DR" 2U ° 2U 4D 1 a° i O j D D 4D D j FIRED WARING DR 4D 4D HAYSTACK RD. D Q 4 4D j 4D 2D `> 2D 1 MESA VIEW DR 2D p1j4T °=4D w D 4D 4D I 2D F9Sn u z ^rN 6D 6D 4D 6D 6D 6D 6D 1 4D 6D SR-111 4D 4D D INSET A 4D EL PASEO PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert, California-OD055:ExNumLanes.dwq URBAN 2-2 Oasis Club Drive is a four (4) lane divided roadway. Washington Street in the study area is a six (6) lane divided roadway. Varner Road from the east end of the study are to west of Cook Street is a two (2) lane divided roadway. From east of Monterey Avenue to west of Cook Street, it is a two (2) lane undivided roadway. Near the intersections of Ramon Road and Monterey Avenue it is a four (4) lane divided roadway. The segment between Ramon Road and Monterey Avenue is a two (2) lane undivided roadway. Ramon Road in the study area is a four (4) lane divided roadway except for the segment west of Bob Hope Drive which is a two (2) lane divided roadway. Dinah Shore Drive is a two (2) lane undivided roadway in the study area, except for the segment west of Bob Hope Drive which is a two (2) lane divided roadway. Gerald Ford Drive from the west end of the study area to Portola Avenue is a four (4) lane divided roadway. From Portola Avenue to Cook Street it is a two (2) lane divided roadway. The segment between Cook Street and Frank Sinatra Drive is two (2) lanes undivided. Frank Sinatra Road is a four (4) lane divided roadway except for the segment near Gerald Ford Drive that is two (2) lanes divided. Tamarisk Row Drive is four (4) lanes undivided east of Eldorado Drive and two (2) lanes undivided north of Country Club Drive Country Club Drive in the study area is a four (4) lane divided roadway. Hovley Lane East is a two (2) lane divided roadway between the Indian Wells City Limits and is a four (4) lane divided roadway everywhere else. 2-3 Avenue 42 in the study area is a four (4) lane divided roadway. Magnesia Falls Drive is a two (2) lane divided roadway. Fred Waring Drive is a four (4) lane divided roadway in the study area. SR-111 in the study area is a six (6) lane divided roadway except for the segment east of Cook Street which is four (4) lanes divided. El Paseo is a four (4) lane divided roadway. Exhibit 2-13 shows available average daily traffic (ADT) count data. Daily traffic count data was compiled from 24-hour intersection approach count data provided by the City of Palm Desert, collected by Urban Crossroads, Inc. or estimated based on peak hour tuming movement volumes at adjacent intersections. Appendix "A" contains daily traffic volume count data. Daily traffic volumes on the City of Palm Desert arterial system range from very low volumes to daily traffic volumes that exceed 40,000 vehicles per day (VPD). Washington Street is the north-south arterial that carries daily traffic volumes exceeding 40,000 VPD in the vicinity of the 1-10 Freeway. Similarly, Fred Waring Drive west of Cook Street and SR-111 east of El Paseo/Cabrillo both carry daily traffic volumes greater than 40,000 VPD. 2.2 Existing Daily Volume to Capacity (V/Q Ratios Exhibit 2-C presents the existing daily volume to capacity (V/C) ratios within the study area based upon existing lanes. Table 2-1 presents existing daily roadway segment volume/capacity ratios, while Table 2-2 summarizes the roadway segments where the daily traffic volume is greater than the existing capacity. Table 2-3 identifies those roadway segments where the daily traffic volume/capacity ratios reflect LOS "E" conditions. Table 2-4 lists roadways with LOS "D" conditions. A 2-4 EXHIBIT 2-B a OM EXISTING AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AV.A NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM .5 5.1 42.1 ., vww" 8.4 0.0 <17.4 6.7 FREowv.7 3.0 .3 i 38.3` 38.9 2.7 _ e Av s .5 _7.7 28 411.3 19.3 NOM 20 23.7 § 30.0 27.9 32. 2.0 .4 28. .811, 5.6 13 3 INSET A s 1.6 83.0 5 RA11d.RD 24.1 6.6 85. 15.6 32. 20.5 <0 4.0 8 34.6 '4F NOM 81.0 - u 3 GERAID FOND DF .9 15.6< 15.5 > 5.9 22.9 5.2 3.5 76.0 16.7 4.0 FRANA sr Tm t 2. AV.s 13.5 11.3 f 10.3 6.0 9.2 NOM 9.5 30.6 6 2.1 2 6.4�' `',�,, •3 4.4 7 couwrm cue oR 46 7.6 28.8 18.7 21.2 21.5 202 31.7 64.0 r m wEst 18.6 7.7 .5 -52 NOAEYLY EAST 6.3 14.2 13.6 12.8 < 14.5 ; 23.1 20.5 MAGNESIA NOM 3.4 25.5 AT� 31.0 =19.8 Fcmm 47.61 FREDWARINGDR 19.9 6 21.7 22.9 7.2 SEE INSET A 1 5 4.3 .4 31.8 sR/II 30 14.5 35.0 8. � 7.3 I.DSRRAUfY aR LEGEND: fr 10_0=VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) /,-E .ysTAcx RD. 1� 3.5 MESA VIEW oR PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY,Palm Desert,California-00055:117 C. URBAI ^� c EXHIBIT 2-C EXISTING VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIOS AV 10 AV a 0.18 81 FAl4 EW DR .60s 71 0-54 .7 ,,�� 44 1.20° .70 1 1 A FRED wPo11G Drl. .63 � .90 .89� a "° o .241.a 39 .35 .60 66H 46 ' .94 .54 .63 .62 .78 .26 .55 71 .18 41 INSET A 0.11 0.5 .50 �,rm 0.75N 0.47 0.30 0'63 0.29 1.46 8 0.03 1.0 qao - 0.69 3 14 GERAID Farm Dn 0.49., 0.48 0.3 5 0.65 0.72 a 0.16 2 0.25 iRAHt O ATRA m .52 .1 AV.n 0.42 0.35 0.32 .19 .29 0.01 0.30 0.18 0.96 .69 .0.10 $ 9, ,.,D� 0.20 23 46 0.46 .17 O NTRY CLUB DR 0.90 0.58 0.66 0.67 0.63 R 1. 0 89 VuymwEsT 0.54 0.58 0.87 .11 10.16 0.83 1gVlEV lN.EAsT c 0.82 0•44 0.85 0.40 0.45 ; 0.72 0.64 AV.OF 0.05 0.21 .80 sTATES 0.60 AG MA F DFJ Z 1.24cr..A 1.49 .68 FDED wAn a eR 0.83 SEE INSET A W.94 .45 17 0.72 0.52 99 95.95 23 .14 1.09 .59 \HOSMAUTV DR LEGEND: .71 -VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO 7-0.,22,2 GK RD DR / 0 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY,Palm Desert,California-00055:118 URBAN 2-6 TABLE 2-1 (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT EXISTING DAILY VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY EXISTING ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT CROSS-SECTION CAPACITY V/C LOS Washington St. Av.38 Varner Rd. 9,500 6D 52,000 0.18 A Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 23,700 6D 52,000 0.46 A Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr. 46,200 6D 52,000 0.89 D Washington St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln.E. 43,000 6D 52,000 0.83 D Washington St. Hovley Ln.E. Fred Waring Dr. 31,000 6D 52,000 0.60 A Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 27,200 6D 52,000 0.52 A Dillon Rd. Hot Springs Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 2,500 21-1 14,000 0.18 A Ramon Rd. Bob Hoe Dr. 1-10 EB Rams 24,100 4D 32,000 0.75 C Ramon Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 1-10 WB Rams 19,100 4D 32,000 0.60 A Ramon Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Varner Rd. 15.900 4D 32,000 0.50 A Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. Chase School Rd. 6,600 2U 14,000 0.47 A Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av, 20,500 2U 14,000 1.46 F Gerald Ford Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av. 15,600 4D 32,000 0.49 A Gerald Ford Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 15,500 4D 32,000 1 0.48 A Gerald Ford Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 5,900 2D 16,000 0.37 A Gerald Ford Dr. Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. 4,000 2U 14,000 0.29 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 13,500 4D 32,000 0.42 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 11,300 4D 32,000 0.35 A N Frank Sinatra Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 10,300 4D 32,000 0.32 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. 6,000 4D 32,000 0.19 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Eldorado Dr. 9,200 4D 32,000 0.29 A Av.38 Varner Rd. Washington St. 300 4D 32,000 0.01 A Tamarisk Row Dr. Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. 6,400 21-1 14,000 0.46 A Varner Rd. Monterey Av. Chase School Rd. 4,000 21-1 14,000 0.29 A Varner Rd. Chase School Rd. Av.38 3,500 21-1 14,000 0.25 A Varner Rd. 1-10 WB On Ramp Washington St. 6,300 4D 32,000 0.20 A Varner Rd. Washington St. 1-10 WB Rams 14,400 7D 62,000 0.23 A Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Adams St. 7,000 5D 42,000 0.17 A 1-10 Freeway W/O Ramon Rd. Ramon Rd. 83,000 8F 160,500 0.52 A 1-10 Freeway Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. 85,000 8F 160,500 0.53 A 1-10 Freeway Monterey Av. Cook St. 81,000 6F 117,500 0.69 B 1-10 Freeway Cook St. Washington St. 76,000 6F 117,500 0.65 B I-10 Freeway Washington St. E/O Washington St. 64,000 6F 117,500 0.54 A Country Club Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av. 28,800 4D 32,000 0.90 D Country Club Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 18.700 4D 32,000 0.58 A Country Club Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 21,200 4D 32,000 0.66 B Country Club Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 21,500 4D 32,000 0.67 B Country Club Dr. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 20,200 4D 32,000 0.63 B Country Club Dr. Oasis Club Dr. Washin ton St. 31.700 4D 32,000 0.99 E Country Club Dr. Washington St. Av.42 19.300 4D 32,000 0.60 A Hovie Ln.E. Portola Av. Cook St. 14,200 4D 32,000 0.44 A Hovley Ln.E. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 13,600 2D 16,000 0.85 D Hovley Ln.E. Eldorado Dr. 10asis Club Dr. 12,800 40 32,000 0.40 A Hovie Ln.E. Oasis Club Dr. lWashington St. 14,500 1 4D 32,000 1 0.45 A TABLE 2-1 PALM DESERT EXISTING DAILY VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY EXISTING ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT CROSS-SECTION CAPACITY V/C LOS Town Center W . Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 7,700 4D 32,000 0.24 A El Paseo SR-111 Plaza W . 8,400 4D 32,000 0.26 A El Paseo SR-111 Portola Av. 6,500 4D 32,000 0.20 A Monterey Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 15,600 6D 52,000 0.30 A Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 22,600 6D 52,000 0.43 A Monterey Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. 32,700 6D 52,000 0.63 B Monterey Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 34,600 4D 32,000 1 1.08 F Monterey Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 22,900 4D 32,000 1 0.72 C Monterey Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 30,600 4D 32,000 0.96 E Monterey Av. Country Club Dr. Parkview Dr. 26,300 4D 32,000 0.82 D Monterey Av, Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 23,000 6D 52,000 0.44 A Monterey Av, Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 20,500 6D 52,000 0.39 A Monterey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 22,800 4D 32,000 0.71 C San Pablo Av. Magnesia Fails Dr. Fred Waring Dr, 10,000 2U 14,000 0.71 C San Pablo Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 11,300 4D 32,000 0.35 A San Pablo Av. SR-111 El Paseo 5,600 4D 32,000 0.18 A San Luis Rey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 6,600 2U 14,000 0.47 A I Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 5,200 4D 32,000 0.16 A v Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr, Country Club Dr, 9,600 4D 32,000 0.30 A Portola Av. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln.E. 18,600 4D 32,000 0.58 A Portola Av. Hovley Ln.E. Magnesia Falls Dr. 20.500 4D 32,000 0.64 B Portola Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 17,400 4D 32,000 0.54 A Portola Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 19,300 4D 32,000 1 0.60 A Portola Av. SR-111 El Paseo 13,000 4D 32,000 0.41 A Deep Canyon Rd. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 19,800 2D 16,000 1.24 F Deep Canyon Rd. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 22,600 3D 24,000 0.94 E Deep Canyon Rd. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 8,300 2U 14,000 0.59 A Chase School Rd. Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. 400 2U 14,000 0.03 A Chase School Rd. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 5,900 51) 42,000 0.14 A Cook St, 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 10,700 5D 42,000 0.25 A Cook St, 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 21,900 5D 42,000 0.52 A Cook St, Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 16,700 4D 32,000 0.52 A Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 22,100 4D 32,000 0.69 B Cook St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln.E. 27,700 4D 32,000 0.87 D Cook St. Hovley Ln.E. Fred Waring Dr. 25,500 4D 32,000 0.80 C Cook St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 14,300 4D 32,000 0.45 A Cook St. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 7,300 4D 32,000 0.23 A Emerald Desert Dr. Kalahari Desert Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 2,200 2U 14,000 0.16 A Eldorado Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 3,200 4D 32,000 0.10 A Eldorado Dr. Count Club Dr, Hovley Ln.E. 3,500 4D 32.000 0.11 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 5,400 4D 32,000 0.17 A Eldorado Dr. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 4,500 4D 32,000 0.14 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. Ramon Rd. 1,600 2U 14,000 0.11 A Oasis Club Dr. Counta Club Dr. Hovley Ln.E. 5,200 4D 32,000 1 0.16 A TABLE 2-2 EXISTING DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUMES GREATER THAN CAPACITY (LOS "F") EXISTING ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT CROSS-SECTION CAPACITY V/C LOS Monterey Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 34,600 4D 32,000 1.08 F Deep Canyon Rd. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 19,800 2D 16,000 1.24 F Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 20,500 2U 14,000 1.46 F Fred Waring Dr. San Pablo Av. Portola Av. 38,300 4D 32,000 1.20 F Fred Warin Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 38,900 4D 32,000 1.22 F Fred Waring Dr. IDeep Can on Rd. Cook St. 47,600 4D 32,000 1.49 F SR-111 1 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. 35,000 4D 32.000 1.09 F U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T2-2 N I O TABLE 2-1 (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT EXISTING DAILY VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY EXISTING ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT CROSS-SECTION CAPACITY V/C LOS Av.42 Washington St. Adams St. 23,100 4D 32,000 0.72 C Magnesia Falls Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 800 2D 16,000 0.05 A Magnesia Falls Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 3,400 2D 16,000 0.21 A Painters Path Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 2,800 2D 16,000 0.18 A Parkview Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av, 5,100 2U 14,000 0.36 A Parkview Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert 8,400 2U 14,000 0.60 A Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. 15,700 4D 32,000 0.49 A Fred Waring Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert 28,900 4D 32,000 0.90 D Fred Waring Dr. College of the Desert San Pablo Av. 28,400 4D 32,000 0.89 D Fred Waring Dr. San Pablo Av. Portola Av. 38,300 4D 32,000 1.20 F Fred Waring Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 38,900 4D 32,000 1.22 F Fred Waring Dr. Deep Canyon Rd. Cook St. 47,600 4D 32,000 1.49 F Fred Waring Dr, California Rd. Washington St. 22,900 4D 32,000 0.72 C Fred Waring Dr. Cook St. California Dr. 21,700 4D 32,000 0.68 B Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 19,900 3D 24,000 0.83 D SR-111 Bob Hope Dr. Parkview Dr. 42,100 6D 52,000 0.81 D SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 36,700 6D 52,000 0.71 C SR-111 Fred Waring Dr. Desert Crossing 32,700 6D 52,000 0.63 B N SR-111 Desert Crossing El Paseo/Town Center W . 34,500 6D 52,000 0.66 B SR-111 El Paseo/Town Center W . Plaza W . 23,700 6D 52,000 0.46 A SR-111 Plaza W . Monterey Av. 28,400 6D 52,000 1 0.55 A SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. 30,000 4D 32,000 0.94 E SR-111 San Pablo Av. San Luis Rey Av. 27,900 6D 52,000 0.54 A SR-111 San Luis Rey Av. Portola Av. 32,900 6D 52,000 0.63 B SR-111 Portola Av. El Paseo/Cabrillo Av, 32,000 6D 52,000 0.62 B SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 40,800 6D 52,000 0,78 C SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 30,400 4D 32,000 0.95 E SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St. 30,500 4D 32,000 0.95 E SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 31,800 4D 32,000 0.99 E SR-111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. 35,000 4D 32,000 1.09 F Mesa View Dr. SR-74 Portola Av, 3,500 2D 16,000 0.22 A U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T2-1 TABLE 2-4 EXISTING DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" EXISTING ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS .Monterey Av. Country Club Dr. Parkview Dr. 26,300 1 4D 32,000 0.82 D Cook St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 27,700 4D 32,000 0.87 D Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr. 46,200 6D 52,000 0.89 D Washington St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 43,000 6D 52,000 0.83 D Country Club Dr. Bob Ho e Dr. Monterey Av, 28,800 4D 32,000 0.90 D Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 13,600 2D 16,000 0.85 D Fred Waring Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert 28,900 4D 32,000 0.90 D Fred Waring Dr. Colle e of the Desert San Pablo Av. 28,400 4D 32,000 0.89 D Fred Waring Dr. Washin ton St. Jefferson St. 19,900 3D 24,000 0.83 D SR-111 Bob Hope Dr. Parkview Dr. 42,100 6D I 52,000 0.81 D N U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xis]T2-4 N TABLE 2-3 EXISTING DAILY ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE "E" EXISTING ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO COUNT CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Monterey Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 30,600 4D 32,000 0.96 E Deep Canyon Rd. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 22,600 3D 24,000 0.94 E Country Club Dr. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 31,700 4D 32,000 0.99 E SR-111 Montere Av. San Pablo Av. 30,000 4D 32,000 0.94 E SR-111 Dee,p Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 30,400 4D 32,000 0.95 E SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St. 30,500 4D 32,000 1 0.951 E SR-111 lCook St. Eldorado Dr. 31,800 4D 32,000 1 0.99 E U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T2-3 N total of 7 roadway segments have V/C ratios indicating that they have volumes exceeding existing capacities, 7 roadway segments have V/C ratios that reflect LOS "E" conditions, and 10 segments reflect LOS "D" conditions. The highest existing V/C ratio is observed along Fred Waring Drive between Deep Canyon Road and Cook Street. 2.3 Existing Intersection Service Levels Fifty-two (52) existing intersections have been selected in coordination with City staff for this analysis. Selection criteria included intersecting roadway size and locations where potential level of service problems have been identified in previous study efforts. Existing intersection lanes are shown on Exhibits 2-D through 2-F. Peak hour turning movement volumes for the existing intersections are included as Appendix "B". AM peak hour intersection turning movement counts are included on Exhibits 2-G through 2-I. Exhibits 2-J through 2-L show volumes for the PM peak hour. Existing (2002) peak hour traffic operations have been evaluated for key study area intersections. The results of this analysis are summarized in Table 2-5, along with the existing intersection geometrics and traffic control devices at the analysis locations. Existing conditions traffic signal warrant analysis has been performed and is included as Appendix "C". Traffic signals are warranted at the following intersection analysis locations for existing conditions: • 1-10 WB Ramps (NS) at Ramon Road (EW) — signal installed in 2003 • Portola Avenue (NS) at Gerald Ford Drive (EW) • Portola Avenue (NS) at Frank Sinatra Drive (EW) 2-13 EXHIBIT 2-D EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY (Page 1 of 3) J 1 ! LL i— =' 1 � 11 1 i f W 0 RAMON RD. RAMON RD.& PARK VIEW DR./ SR-111 & &1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS PAINTERS PATH &SR-111 FRED WARING DR. rd -H r i i i r DESERT CROSSING & EL PASEO/TOWN CENTER PLAZA WAY& MONTEREY AV.& SR-111 WAY&SR-111 SR-111 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS C-DE J ! llL � JlIL � i I ril L L � 11 1 1 i r MONTEREY AV. & MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV. & MONTEREY AV.& DINAH SHORE DR. GERALD FORD DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. �- EFJilLLiJ11lLLri rill W MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& PARK VIEW DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS _ L 1l• J1lLLi=- rj; �l• =EF COLLEGE OF THE DESERT& SAN PABLO AV.& SAN PABLO AV.& SAN LUIS REY& r FRED WARING DR. FRED WARING DR SR-111 SR-111 PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:124A URBAN 2-14 EXHIBIT 2-E EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY (Page Z of 3) jDEFL DEF-� Wo W PORTOLA AV. & PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS GERALD FORD DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. rj I L;t—:DEF �-- rl , o � o PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& HOVLEY LANE EAST MAGNESIA FALLS DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 jL—DEF rj 4— —! ! Lt—=- pE=' 111T 1-10 WB RAMPS& EL PASEO/CABRILLO AV. DEEP CANYON RD.& DEEP CANYON RD. & VARNER RD.AT PORTOLA AV. & SR-111 FRED WARING DR. SR-111 W rj1- f— - 11 f- l 11 L J 11 LL --' -1 f HOSPITALITY DR.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST. & SR-111 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS GERALD FORD DR. J11LL �— J11LL � J11LL � J11LL �— � 11ii— 11ii� COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST. & FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. HOVLEY LANE EAST FRED WARING DR. PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL Palm Desert,California-00055:124B URBAN 2-1 5 EXHIBIT 2-F EXISTING INTERSECTION GEOMETRY (Page 3 of 3) W � �- Jl l-L F- �- Jl• �EF COOK ST.& GERALD FORD DR.& ELDORADO DR. & ELDORADO DR.& SR-111 FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. L--DEF mj � J -!- r� , L --, J L -� EF—i W DEFT i D �! o ELDORADO DR.& ELDORADO DR.& TAMARISK ROW DR.& OASIS CLUB DR.& HOVLEY LANE EAST SR-111 COUNTRY CLUB DR. AVENUE 42 �— (-DEF �111LL � i11LL � HILL J111Lf- �' +iliii� liiif DEFT -T- DEF--� WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& VARNER RD. COUNTRY CLUB DR. 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS HOVLEY LANE EAST r �-DEF 1l i-= J111 � "i'l i i WASHINGTON ST.& VARNER RD.& FRED WARING DR. 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS (AT WASHINGTON ST.) I PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL Palm Desert,California-00055:124C URBAN 2-16 EXHIBIT EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLU 2 S NIES (Page 1 of 3) 83 269L7 —761 ^t �11 -40v 4 r4176 f-119 14 J -i 421 , 323-► ov 489-� 1101� 1 f �� 1}r v'- 14 1 N 15� nn vM w RAMON RD. RAMON RD.& PARK VIEW DR./ SR-111 & &1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS PAINTERS PATH&SR-111 FRED WARING DR. rmo, rn J �► e"- L0-to3r3 )�-39 729 r 0� 71 173 } — 026- 14� 589 7 }5 � r CON Ln" DESERT CROSSING & EL PASEO/TOWN CENTER PLAZA WAY& MONTEREY AV.& SR-111 WAY&SR-111 SR-111 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS (361 216 rnTa p C �292 raory D�:47 83 °D83 �Y'M �933 i- f-30 J L J L f-307 1 } ,} 36,J 406--►298-) v MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV. & DINAH SHORE DR. GERALD FORD DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. rfft L45 �� )53 oMco L75 _ f-22 J L J j jL f-1544 J + 4-145 f-293 88 51-J J 131-- ,}}r 420Y 614-- , } 81 aornto GoLn 201--) r-SAM 102� -r i MwM in V� MN MONTEREY AV. & MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& PARK VIEW DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 202 I f�-1 L1"3'8781 —674 -w- L38 —793 " —88 go 0f-151 r-47 9z25 - 15 }� 3 },r —rn COLLEGE OF THE DESERT& SAN PABLO AV.& SAN PABLO AV. & SAN LUIS REY& FRED WARING DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 SR-1110 PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL, Palm Desert,California-00055:125A URBAN 2-17 EXHIBIT 2-H EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES (Page 2 of 3) rf-- 63` 31 516 � 1 �9 5 1 235-- (' 9� 1 t r 23J 257-i Nry 128-� n�a 225-� t -m PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS GERALD FORD DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. rnv L N 103 822 1121 �'" L L481-357 v„D,n (-393 (-34Cl 73 2974 in } (` 101--j 98j1tr 22; m 357; ,acorn 864: '-om Nsf� PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& HOVLEY LANE EAST MAGNESIA FALLS DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 A9 rAff 4---694 ri-m 4 -194 r�-150 (-2658 �500 I600� 1 t (' 1 } (- 29 1024 � 1 } (- -� 37� nw� o T 1-10 WB RAMPS& EL PASEO/CABRILLO AV. DEEP CANYON RD.& DEEP CANYON RD.& VARNER RD.AT PORTOLA AV. & SR-111 FRED WARING DR. SR-111 ':5 m _Nvn_ L-21 r v maonrmn k-95 J � L �07 J � 1-132 � L J � L f-136 22-J 688-►ii-J1V r 2-- t (• 80-.► �aM 662-j C" jd3-�_. ^ v HOSPITALITY DR.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST. & SR-111 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS GERALD FORD DR. rs ^);�:43 noN )47 cn^an L750 `aaN �00 J l J f--175 L r-19o4 105--' 164� 320 1 t f 379--►146, 123, 166—� Na"onu�mn 167--� `rovN .-v COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST. & FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. HOVLEY LANE EAST FRED WARING DR. PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL, Palm Desert,California-00055:125B URBAN 2-18 EXHIBIT 2-1 EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES (Page 3 of 3) L-222 r L-104 r L-49 r 4-3�aB ~2oa f-5?2 f-i23 63366-2 108- 448 1 t r 11-� 1 t r 37� Novi 36-- ° 181-` mvxo COOK ST.& GERALD FORD DR.& ELDORADO DR.& ELDORADO DR.& SR-111 FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. ► 2 6 4 2010 r�= L r.. L _0m - rn f10J - 452 - 0 3 —5 2 3 � r26 ► 74- 319-j 64—J DDn 49 291 -1 � ELDORADO DR.& ELDORADO DR.& TAMARISK ROW DR.& OASIS CLUB DR. & HOVLEY LANE EAST SR-111 COUNTRY CLUB DR. AVENUE 42 o+ oc>0 r oac 76 260 0�NN62 _ ;40111� � �376 J � �► �-814 � �► 49 1tt r 1 1 224 mm -J 6 3i 5010 5 23 -) n� WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& VARNER RD. COUNTRY CLUB DR. 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS HOVLEY LANE EAST v ov00i L-209 ri f-315 117-) t r 362-J 1 t 353-� 25 10" frun N00 � WASHINGTON ST.& VARNER RD.& FRED WARING DR. 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS (AT WASHINGTON ST.) I PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:125C URBAN 2-19 EXHIBIT 2-J EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES (Page 1 of 3) Nn N rn L 65 4-338 4-241 '�� - 693 �Oi00 —1681 n�'a --143 �459 J �► 165 J �► �46 J L r190 265J 582-- 297� '� t (" 98_! 437-- n� 463-� 1623-- Naxn 117-- �co 103-j to N 70--� vwxv r4- RAMON RD. RAMON RD.& PARK VIEW DR./ SR-111 & &1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS PAINTERS PATH &SR-111 FRED WARING DR. �-•-rn ;4-31 r-'-mcnA-74 vxnrN. k-102 0 0601 i-5243 J �► i-30z 1326� t r185-J 1295--� 1 t 1320— 1 r 645� r vxn -1 N1n DESERT CROSSING& EL PASEO/TOWN CENTER PLAZA WAY& MONTEREY AV.& SR-111 WAY&5R-111 SR-111 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS NN �0 r*xnrn 631 4-322 �81 k-149 J � �► �0 J � �► f-235 J � �► �568 J � �► { 338 4980J 1 r 578- � r �- 1� 8g8 1 r 273-i vN� 156� pro 81-� o� 372-� n�v1 MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& DINAH SHORE DR. GERALD FORD DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. r-F, ;78197 mmo :19 L256 r3i 4-212 95 J �► ;289 _ 19Z J i-312 26 300-) _! 1 t 106~ ,}r 396~ 1 tt r 1188y o -i rna,rn --) rv�nN Iwo MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV. & MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& PARK VIEW DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS r�it- �1056 v r �848 r_�R 4-125 r L42�7 J � � �1az f-790 f-131 993� t r 48� 1 t r 140-) -1 t r 88-J 1 t r 17-i 976-- van 1271 ,aNr 1237-- 139-) �nrnN 53� Horn 129� COLLEGE OF THE DESERT& SAN PABLO AV.& SAN PABLO AV.& SAN LUIS REY& FRED WARING DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 SR-111 PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL, Palm Desert,California-00055:126A URBAN 2-20 EXHIBIT 2-K EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES (Page 2 of 3) Ln �11 Jv wa�► �3 1-23 9 -6_ 6 rjL�Z� --�5 I 333— r 11--' '� } (- 22"J 203-� oo� 382- cooxn 100_5 } r m 117� � 249 , ono �nxr PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS GERALD FORD DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. n'�►' J �► :123O1 _r.co 168 68k-322 781 - 123 89�2 J Lf-161 J r175�� (-365 t r 3� '� } f 240-_J } (� 193-0 1 } couloo 1473-- = 27 , .aO1O1CDor 113� o1 m 110-� � v.- PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& HOVLEY LANE EAST MAGNESIA FALLS DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 cove- l-29 rjrT; -989 L345 C331 ;814500) 189 00 J + �► ('126 �4573 1 1326- ,o,r 1546- c}r 60 mrn 157-� Ln �co0DO1iv �r- 1-10 WB RAMPS& EL PASEO/CABRILLO AV. DEEP CANYON RD.& DEEP CANYON RD.& VARNER RD.AT PORTOLA AV. & SR-111 FRED WARING DR. SR-111 r!�,- 21L30 rvrn_ �n � " L�1711 J � i-225 ; � J`DS 13 ,} } (^ 16J } (� 147� 120� oocv� 430-� � 109� °Dv� HOSPITALITY DR.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& SR-111 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS GERALD FORD DR. Ln )a v°Di -) I J � �► � v 173 ► �rn2 mr7 �4 54120 _ gj80�5 142 156 f-1 —167 —45667 �L J2256 } 55 } 542� 8~ - } � 1 � 134-� .-ao COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. HOVLEY LANE EAST FRED WARING DR. PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL, Palm Desert,California-00055:1266 URBAN —A,o s 2-21 21 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES MES (Page 3 of 3) (1211— �285 rN. -168 ov� 61 coo 4 -8 r�� J �,26 Jj208 J f--Z73 uaiinv 205-► 9956-- J }r 233-- , } r -� -i 103� coo- COOK ST.& GERALD FORD DR.& ELDORADO DR.& ELDORADO DR.& SR-111 FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. FRANK SINATRA DR J m�► CD / ' ^i.. L4 41 f91,v L58 o - 408 i4 r-3 ► �353 106-J �6�-) 974� 575662 - -J ELDORADO DR. & ELDORADO DR.& TAMARISK ROW DR.& OASIS CLUB DR.& HOVLEY LANE EAST SR-111 COUNTRY CLUB DR. AVENUE 42 O281co cn co D53�39 (308:--;) i� r 53 MOO 3 333 rr' 170 � 38 36 7 1rILO-It0 6 �J20 � WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& VARNER RD. COUNTRY CLUB DR. 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS HOVLEY LANE EAST (658; L161 =f--421 } r 2,8- D o� 30� WASHINGTON ST.& VARNER RD.& FRED WARING DR. 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS (AT WASHINGTON ST.) 1 PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert, California-00055:126C URBAN 2-22 TABLE 2-5 EXISTING(2002)PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- DELAY3 LEVEL OF TRAFFIC' BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND SECS. SERVICE INTERSECTIONS CONTROL L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM 1-10 WB Ramps(NS)at: Ramon Rd. (EW) AWS 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1» 40.9 -° E F 1-10 EB Ramps(NS)at: Ramon Rd.(EW) TS 0 0 0 1 0 1» 0 1 1>> 1 1 0 17.4 24.0 B C Park View Dr./Painters Path(NS)at: SR-111 (EW) TS 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 1 22.6 28.7 C C SR-111 (NS)at: • Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 0 2 3 0 31.0 34.5 C C Desert Crossing(NS)at: SR-111(EW) TS 1.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 3 1 2 3 0 29.5 32.9 C5 C5 El Paseo/Town Center Way(NS)at: SR-111 (EW) TS 1.5 1.5 1 1.5 1.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 0 30.7 32.8 C C5 Plaza Way(NS)at: • SR-111 (EW) TS 1 1 1 1 0.5 1.5 2 3 0 1 3 1 18.6 30.2 B C Monterey Av.(NS)at: 1-10 WB Ramps(EW) TS 2 2 0 0 3 1» 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 23.4 21.7 C C 1-10 EB Ramps(EW) TS 0 3 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 16.0 33.0 B C Dinah Shore Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 0 1 3 1» 2 2 0 1 2 0 16.1 17.3 B B Gerald Ford Dr.(EW) TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 25.8 33.0 C C Frank Sinatra Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1» 2 3 1>> 22.3 23.3 C C Country Club Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1» 2 3 1» 27.9 34.0 C C Park View Dr.(EW) TS 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 20.7 34.6 C C Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 0 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 23.9 32.8 C C SR-111 (EW) TS 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 256 447 C D College of the Desert(NS)at: . . Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 17.6 23.6 B C San Pablo Av.(NS)at: Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 24.9 26.8 C C SR-111 EW TS 1 2 0 1 2 1» 2 3 1 2 3 0 26.6 27.2 C C San Luis Rey(NS)at: r. Gerald 111 (EW) TS 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 22.5 22.6 C C Av. (NS)at: Ford Dr.(EW) AWS 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 11.6 12.3 B B k Sinatra Dr.(EW) AWS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 14.4 17.6 B C ntry Club Dr.(EW) TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 25.7 33.9 C C Hovley Ln. E.(EW) TS 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 20.7 18.3 C B Magnesia Falls Dr.(EW) TS 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 25.9 27.6 C C Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 1 2 1» 1 2 1» 1 2 1 1 2 0 27.4 32.8 C C SR-111 (EW) TS 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 26.5 31.3 C C El Paseo/Cabrillo Av.(NS)at: SR-111 (EW) TS 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 23.3 26.2 C C Deep Canyon Rd.(NS)at: Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 -° _° F5 F5 SR-111 (EW) TS 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 26.5 1 40.0 C5 D5 Hospitality Dr.(NS)at: SR-111 (EW) TS 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 20.0 1 20.5 B C 2-23 TABLE 2-5(CONTINUED) EXISTING (2002)PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERSECTION APPROACH LANESz NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- DELAY LEVEL OF TRAFFIC' BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND SECS. SERVICE INTERSECTIONS CONTROL L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM Cook St.(NS)at: 1-10 WB Ramps(EW) TS 0 2 1» 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8.5 10.2 A B 1-10 EB Ramps(EW) TS 0 3 0 1 3 0 1.5 0.5 1 0 0 0 21.6 21.1 C C Gerald Ford Dr. (EW) TS 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 25.0 24.0 C C Frank Sinatra Dr.(EW) TS 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 32.6 34.1 C C Country Club Dr.(EW) TS 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 32.6 27.8 C C Hovley Ln.E.(EW) TS 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 27.5 32.1 C C Fred Waring Dr. (EW) TS 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 -° 56.1 F E SR-111 (EW) TS 1 2 0 1.5 1.5 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 33.0 33.2 C CS Gerald Ford Dr.(NS)at: Frank Sinatra Dr. (EW) CSS 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 11.6 12.4 B B Oasis Club Dr. (NS)at: Country Club Dr. (EW) TS 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 18.7 16.8 B B Hovley Ln.E.(EW) AWS 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 12.7 14.2 B B Eldorado Dr.(NS)at: Country Club Dr. (EW) TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 23.6 24.3 C C Frank Sinatra Dr.(EW) AWS 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10.3 10.2 B B Hovley Ln.E.(EW) AWS 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 16.1 ° C F SR-111 (EW) TS 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 23.3 24.6 C C Washington St.(NS)at: [Varner Rd.(EW) TS 2 3 1> 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1.5 1.5 35.0 26.3 C C . 1-10 EB Ramps (EW) TS 0 3 1 2 3 0 1.5 0.5 2 0 0 0 15.1 15.7 B B Country Club Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 0 2 3 1 2 2 0 1 2 1 33.7 49.1 C D Hovley Ln.E. (EW) TS 1 3 1 13 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 44.5 69.6 D E Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 24.5 26.2 C C rner Rd.(NS)at:-10 WB Ramps(EW) TS 1 2 2 0 1 0 3 1 L.2 0 1 1 0 0 0 16.6 16.9 B B ' TS-Traffic Signal;AWS-All Way Stop;CSS-Cross Street Stop. 2 When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left;T=Through;R=Right;>=Right Turn Overlap;»=Free Right Turn 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Traffx,Version 7.5 R1 (2001). -=Delay High, Intersection Unstable, Level of Service"F". e Pedestrians assumed not to occur on every cycle. U:1U cJobst000551deI1030829\[TAB LES.xls]T2-4 2-24 • Eldorado Drive (NS) at Hovley Lane East (EW) • Oasis Club Drive (NS) at Hovley Lane East (EW) For existing traffic conditions, many of the study area intersections are currently operating at Level of Service "C" or better during the peak hours. However, the following intersections operate at LOS "D" or worse: 1-10 Westbound Ramps (NS) at: • Ramon Road (EW) (AM/PM) Monterey Avenue (NS) at: • SR-111 (EW) (PM) Deep Canyon Road (NS) at: • Fred Waring Drive (EW) (AM/PM) • SR-111 (EW) (PM) Cook Street (NS) at: • Fred Waring Drive (EW) (AM/PM) El Dorado Drive (NS) at: • Hovley Lane East (EW) (PM) Washington Street (NS) at: • Country Club Drive (EW) (PM) • Hovley Lane East (EW) (PM) Existing HCM calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix "D". 2-25 2.4 Transportation Planning Context The transportation planning context for the City of Palm Desert includes the City's Currently Adopted General Plan Circulation Element and standard roadway cross-sections. The transportation planning context also includes ongoing regional planning efforts, including the Regional Transportation Plan, the Riverside County Integrated Project, and the Congestion Management Program. 2.4.1 City of Palm Desert Currently Adopted General Plan Exhibit 2-M depicts the currently adopted Circulation Plan for the City of Palm Desert. Town Center Way is a four (4) lane divided scenic secondary roadway. Monterey Avenue from Dinah Shore Drive to SR-111 will be six (6) lane divided arterial. South of SR-111, it will be four (4) lane divided major thoroughfare. San Pablo Avenue is a six (6) lane divided arterial from San Gorgonio Way to SR-111. From Fred Waring Drive to San Gorgonio Way it is a four (4) lane undivided secondary roadway. From Magnesia Falls Drive to Fred Waring Drive it is a four (4) lane divided scenic secondary roadway. Portola Avenue in the study area is a four (4) lane divided major thoroughfare. Deep Canyon Road is a secondary roadway with two (2) lanes undivided. Cook Street in the study area is a six (6) lane divided arterial. Eldorado Drive from Frank Sinatra Road to Hovley Lane East is a six (6) lane divided arterial. 2-26 EXHIBIT 2-M CURRENTLY ADOPTED CITY OF PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT �� y _ LEGEND- .7f ( i rrrM,MM ARTERIAL STREET MAJOR THOROUGHFARE I; SCENIC SECONDARY SECONDARY ROADWAY I, I' •. .I nlnunal COLLECTOR STREET ADOPTED 3PHERE j•:�••:, •••• •••• _ . _ CITY LIMIT �.w..• P_ROP03ED STREET IIAILAOAD TRACK a` ; •. �-�-•-- STORM CHANNEL I PROPOSED BRIDGE i1 �r L v ffUlT'NG BRIDGE TL— a-----'� ••.•rw rrr c •' 1 =�•---_"'•.f•s•�lar�+�il+r s+»r r.ar•.rrsrw►r.r.�►....rwr►r+►.wr.r !. j �"' • •-•-•• y. ......... .'•: I: . i { SOURCE:CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:' URBAN 2-27 Oasis Club Drive is a four (4) lane divided major thoroughfare. Washington Street in the study area is a six (6) lane divided arterial. Dinah Shore Drive is a six (6) lane divided arterial in the study area. East of Monterey Avenue, Urban Crossroads, Inc. staff has been directed to use a four lane divided cross-section for this roadway segment. Gerald Ford Drive from Monterey Avenue to Cook Street is an arterial with six (6) lanes divided. From Cook Street to Frank Sinatra Road it is a four (4) lane undivided secondary roadway. Frank Sinatra Road in the study area is a six (6) lane arterial street. Tamarisk Row Drive major thoroughfare with four (4) lanes divided. Country Club Drive in the study area is a six (6) lane divided roadway. Hovley Lane East is a four (4) lane divided secondary roadway, from Portola Avenue to Cook Street Between Cook Street and Washington Street it is a four (4) lane divided major thoroughfare. Avenue 42 in the study area is a major thoroughfare with four (4) lanes divided. Magnesia Falls Dive is a four (4 ) lane divided scenic secondary roadway. Parkview Drive is a four (4) lane undivided secondary roadway. Fred Waring Drive in the study area is a six (6) lane divided arterial street. SR-111 in the study area is an arterial street with six (6) lanes divided. 2-28 El Paseo is a four(4) lane divided roadway. Exhibit 2-N presents the current City of Palm Desert General Plan roadway cross-sections. While secondary roadways are shown as not having median treatments, four lane roads throughout the City are wide enough to have separate left turn lanes at intersections and this is standard practice under existing conditions. Capacity has therefore been assumed to approximate divided conditions, as left turning vehicles do not block through movements. Table 2-6 summarizes planned improvements for intersections as roadways are constructed to their General Plan buildout configurations. It is assumed that 6 lane divided roadways typically have enough right-of-way to incorporate 2 left turn lanes and a right turn lane at intersections. For four lane divided roadways, intersections are expected to include a left and sometimes right turn lane in their typical intersection geometries. The table also includes other lane configurations specifically provided by the City Engineer. 2.4.2 The Regional Transportation Plan The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is a component of the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to address regional issues, goals, objectives, and policies for the Southern California region into the early part of the 21 st century. The RTP, which SCAG periodically updates to address changing conditions in the Southland, has been developed with active participation from local agencies throughout the region, elected officials, the business community, community groups, private institutions, and private citizens. The RTP sets broad goals for the region and provides strategies to reduce problems related to congestion and mobility. 2-29 EXHIBIT 2-N CITY OF PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS ow-m ptra .r�-t. w rtr ,r I ♦ N COLLECTOR STREET .o. w M' tT r tr tr 777'76,M4 SECONDARY ROADWAY >ar ftow If tr rrP ir v r r i n rr tr soak SCENIC SECONDARY ROADWAY uffP" >r •_ ,r >o _MAJOR THOR�LIOHFARE ,_• r tr E ARTERIAL STREET t1 31'-154'11/w) 134'A/W i t 12' •' 12 12' 14' !' 9' 14. 12' 12'r, r)' 12 20' t -•OURCE:CITY OF PALM DESERT rrurr rr ARTERIAL STf EET (174'-1s4'A/W ) SCENIC EASEMENT (VARIABLE), WHERE APPROPRIATE. PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL, Palm Desert,Cal'rfomia-00055:Cross URBAN 2-30 TABLE 2-6 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MASTER LIST OF FUNDED/ASSUMED IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- INTERSECTION BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ( NS & EW) L T R L T R L T R L T R Ramon Rd./Bob Hope Dr. & 1-10 WB Ramps 2003 Conditions 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1>> Planned Buildout Improvements Reconfigure Interchange Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 TT 0 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Ramon Rd./Bob Hope Dr. & 1-10 EB Ramps 2003 Conditions 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 11>>1 0 1 111>>1 1 1 1 1 0 Planned Buildout Improvements Reconfigure Interchange Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0 3 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 Park View Dr./Painters Path &SR-111 2003 Conditions 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 1 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0.5 0.51 1 0.510.51 1 1 3 0 1 3 1 SR-111 & Fred Waring Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 0 2 3 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 3 0 2 3 1 0 Desert Crossing & SR-111 2003 Conditions 1 1.51 0.5 1 1 10.51 0.51 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 3 0 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 1.51 0.51 1 10.51 0.51 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 3 0 El Paseo/Town Center W . & SR-111 2003 Conditions 1.5 1.5 1 1.5 1.5 1 1 3 0 1 jiffo Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1.5 1.5 1 1.5 .1.5 1 1 3 0 1 Plaza W . & SR-111 2003 Conditions 7-1—F 1 1 1 0.5 1.5 2 3 0 1 3 1 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 1 1 1 0.5 1.5 2 3 0 1 3 1 Monterey Av. & 1-10 EB Ramps 2003 Conditions 0 3 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 1>> Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0 3 1 2 2 0 1 2 1 0 1>> 0 0 0 Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 3 1 0 1 1 1 3 1 1>>l 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 3 1 1>> Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1>>1 3 1 2_1 1 1 2 3 1 1>> Monterey Av. & Gerald Ford Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements -Lf 3 2 3 3 1 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 Monterey Av. & Frank Sinatra Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1>>l 2 1 3 1 1>> Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 11>>1 2 1 3 1 1>>11 2-31 TABLE 2-6(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MASTER LIST OF FUNDED/ASSUMED IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- INTERSECTION BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ( NS & EW) L T R L T R L T R L T R Monterey Av. & Country Club Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 1>> Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 FI> 2 3 1>> Monterey Av. & Park View Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 jo 1 1 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 0 3 0 2 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 3 0 2 3 0 2 1 1 1 0 Monterey Av. & Fred Waring Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 3 0 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 3 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 MontereyAv. & SR-111 2003 Conditions 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 2 3 2 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1-10 WB Ramp &Varner Road at Montere Av. 2003 Conditions 2 2 0 0 1 3 11>>1 0 1 0 0 1 1.51 0 1 1.5 Planned Buildout Improvements Reconfigure Interchange Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 College of the Desert& Fred Waring Dr. 2003 Conditions 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Im rovements 3 3 0 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0.5 0.51 0 0.5 0.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 1 0 San Pablo Av. & Fred Waring Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 2 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 San Pablo Av. & SR-111 2003 Conditions 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 1>> 2 3 1 2 3 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 1 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1» 2 3 1 2 3 1 San Luis Re & SR-111 2003 Conditions 0.510.51 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Portola Av. & 1-10 EB Ramps 2003 Conditions Does Not Exist Planned Buildout Improvements 0 3 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0 3 1 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Portola Av. & Gerald Ford Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 2 3 1>> 2 3 3 1» Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 2 1 2 1 3 1» 2 3 1 2 3 1» 2—32 TABLE 2-6(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MASTER LIST OF FUNDED/ASSUMED IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- INTERSECTION BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ( NS & EW) L FT R L T R L I T I R-1 L I T I R Portola Av. & Frank Sinatra Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 2 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 13 1 2 3 1 Portola Av. & Country Club Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 2 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 lf 2 3 1 2 3 1 Portola Av. & Hovley Ln. E. 2003 Conditions 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Portola Av. & Magnesia Falls Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 2 0 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Portola Av. & Fred Waring Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 2 1>> 1 2 1>> 1 2 1 1 2 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 2 3 1 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 2 1>> 1 2 1>> 2 3 1 2 3 1 Portola Av. & SR-111 2003 Conditions 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3-1-1— Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1-10 WB Ramps & Varner Rd. at Portola Av. 2003 Conditions I Does Not Exist Planned Buildout Improvements 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. & SR-111 2003 Conditions 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 0 3 0 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 1 2 1 1_f 1 I 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 3 0 Deep Canyon Rd. & Fred Waring Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 1>> 3 2 0 3 1 2 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 2 1>> 3 2 0 1 3 1 2 3 1 Deep Canyon Rd. & SR-111 1 2003 Conditions 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 2 0 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 0 1 3 1 Hospitality Dr. & SR-111 2003 Conditions 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 0 3 0 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 0 2-33 TABLE 2-6 (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MASTER LIST OF FUNDED/ASSUMED IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- INTERSECTION BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ( NS & EW) L T I R L I T I R L T R L T R Cook St. & 1-10 WB Ramps 2003 Conditions 1 0 1 2 11>>1 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0 1 3 1 1>>l 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Cook St. & 1-10 EB Ramps 2003 Conditions 0 3 0 1 3 0 1.51 0.5 1 0 0 0 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0 3 —0 _1 1 3 0 1.5 0.5 1 0 0 0 Cook St. & Gerald Ford Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 3 1 1>> Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1>>1 2 2 1 Cook St. & Frank Sinatra Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 1 3 3 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Cook St. & Country Club Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 3 3 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Cook St. & Hovley Ln. E. 2003 Conditions 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 3 2 1 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Cook St. & Fred Waring Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 3 1>>l 3 3 1> Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 1 2 3 1>>1 2 1 3 1 2 3 1>> Cook St. & SR-111 2003 Conditions 1 2 1 0 1.5 1.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3—f 1 2 3 1 2 3 1-1 2 3 1 Gerald Ford Dr. & Frank Sinatra Dr. 2003 Conditions 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements I 1 1 3 3 0 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 3 0 Eldorado Dr. & Country Club Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements— 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Eldorado Dr. & Frank Sinatra Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 3 3 0 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 1 1 0.5 1 0.51 1 1 3 1 1 3 I 0 2-34 TABLE 2-6 (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MASTER LIST OF FUNDED/ASSUMED IMPROVEMENTS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- INTERSECTION BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ( NS & EW) L T R L I T R L T I R L T R Eldorado Dr. & Hovley Ln. E. 2003 Conditions 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 1.5 1.5 2 2 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 1 2 0 0 2 0 Eldorado Dr. & SR-111 2003 Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Oasis Club Dr:-& Country Club Dr. 2003 Conditions 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1-1 2 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 1 1 2 3 2 Final Planned Buildout Conditions1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 F]3q 1 Oasis Club Dr. & Hovley Ln. E. 2003 Conditions 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 Washington St. &Varner Rd. 2003 Conditions 2 3 1> 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1.5 1.5 Planned Buildout Improvements 1.5 1.5 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1> 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1.5 1.5 Washington St. & 1-10 EB Ramps 2003 Conditions 0 3 1 2 3 0 1.51 0.51 2 0 0 0 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 0 34 1 2 1 3 1 0 1.51 0.51 2 0 0 0 Washington St. &Country Club Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 3 0 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 L J1>>l 3 1 1 2 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 3 2 1 2 3 1 Washington St. & Hovley Ln. E. 2003 Conditions 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 2 2 2 1 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Washington St. & Fred Waring Dr. 2003 Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 2 3 Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 Varner Rd. & 1-10 WB Ramps 2003 Conditions 2 2 0 0 3 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Planned Buildout Conditions 2 2 0 0 3 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 U-.\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T2-6 2-35 2.4.3 Riverside County Integrated Project The purpose of the RCIP is to integrate the processes of planning land use, transportation improvements and preserving habitat for endangered species. A primary objective of the RCIP is to accommodate projected population growth within Riverside County by focusing development within areas that will be readily accessible, will provide a good quality of life for future residents, and will minimize environmental and community impacts, including impacts to sensitive habitats and endangered species. The most current RCIP network is included as Exhibit 2-0. This City of Palm Desert General Plan Traffic Study conforms to the latest RCIP network, which Riverside County Staff has directed is to be used for all analysis in lieu of the currently adopted Riverside County General Plan. Exhibit 2-P summarizes the resulting number of through lanes that can be anticipated under Currently Adopted General Plan buildout conditions. The lanes are based on the City of Palm Desert Circulation Element within the City of Palm Desert (per the limits of the adopted circulation element), or on the proposed RCIP network for other roadways. 2.4.4 Congestion Management Program The Riverside County Congestion Management Program (CMP) is updated every five years in accordance with Proposition 111, passed in June 1990. The CMP was established in the State of California to more directly link land use, transportation and air quality and to prompt reasonable growth management programs that would more effectively utilize new and existing transportation funds, alleviate traffic congestion and related impacts, and improve air quality. The Circulation Element describes how the future transportation system will function. This is important for congestion management, since deficiencies along 2-36 EXHIBIT 2-0 PROPOSED RCIP NETWORK nv 0 �00 o- r n C n Fs YE to Sx z - M� F O r ME `rr � Legend { � . 4Itz CLASSIFICATION . EXPRESSWAY URBAN ARTERIAL ,: tAVr ARTERIAL MAJOR ® SECONDARY : COLLECTOR r } s� MOUNTAIN ARTERIAL PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,Califomia-00055:rcipURBAN CROSSROAU� 2-37 EXHIBIT 2-P CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES AD AD _ w a AV.» AD AD > b �AD w AV.n AD AD w AD ` w rAwcAW� o W DR. AD �,D o AD D so IDU 0 rT¢D wARwn Da- w w D 6D 4Da Ao +�,w D so 6D 6D w 6D AD 6D xi INSET A AD AD - 0 a m D a a ° A �# 2D D AD AD w 6D RMgN RD. so 6D w AD w w w AD w AD w g 6D .o AD AD AD w GEPrAD FORD w 6DAO w W L �w 3 v o AD AD AD AD ERAwt sAwTru M. 1U AD 6D w w w AD yr w6D WD AD 7D AD w ca#rrwvC Dn w 6D w w w w .MEIM S7 K w AD AD 5D b i w —w-l64 EAST b AV.AI AD 3 AD AD AD AD Av.a zu IMGNE SIA Eros AD stAlFs w w w rAED WAlAN('Da AD w w w SEE INSET A 6O w w w sn„ ,w 2U 6D AD 40 MOSVDAl1rY DR. 3 0 g LEGEND: HAYST—RO. 4 =NUMBER OF LANES D =DIVIDED u6s40 DR U =UNDIVIDED PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,Califomia-00055:Lanes URBAN 2-38 the CMP system must be mitigated when they occur. The ability to address such deficiencies now, instead of when they occur, is critical. Understanding the reason for these deficiencies and identifying ways to reduce the impact of future growth and development along a critical CMP corridor will conserve scarce funding resources and help target those resources appropriately. The CMP in the Coachella Valley system is shown on Exhibit 2-Q. The State highways on the CMP roadway system in the study area include the 1-10 Freeway, SR-74, and SR-111. Principal arterials on the CMP system in the study area include Monterey Avenue from the 1-10 Freeway to SR-111 and Ramon Road west of the 1-10 Freeway. For principal arterials, the CMP standard of LOS "E" or better is less stringent than the City of Palm Desert standard of LOS "C" or better (or the potential change to an LOS "D" standard that is considered in this study), therefore, additional analysis at these locations is unnecessary. 2-39 A r 3 v m kA m A OT n z 3 o v m M r d N 3 MI O Z t1 � ii s 3 d z 86 N W M .A 3 O 11 M z O Riverside CMP System (Coachella Valley) Exhibit 2-2 (cont.) a C% Legcnd O . arc w e A M Principal Arterials on CMP System << = A woo Highways on CMP System -'11>1 I rn Interstates on CMP System 0 M C %A X ?� -c0 = ir— H C W Ox '■t Z -� oz 3.0 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE The Currently Adopted General Plan scenario reflects the currently adopted General Plan Land Use Element. Table 3-1 summarizes trip generation for the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario. The Currently Adopted General Plan scenario generates the least amount of traffic for the entire study area. The mid district is the only trip generation district with more trip generation for the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario than for any other scenario. For the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario, there are almost 100,000 more trips attracted to the City of Palm Desert than are produced in the City. Over half of this difference is attributable to Home-Based Shopping/Personal Business, implying that commercial areas are expected to draw traffic from surrounding communities. 3.1 Currently Adopted General Plan Alternative Daily Traffic Volumes Exhibit 3-A presents the future daily traffic volumes for Currently Adopted General Plan conditions. Appendix "E" contains the future forecasts refinement calculations. Daily traffic volumes have been refined for the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario to eliminate negative growth throughout the study area. The highest daily volumes occur most often near the 1-10 Freeway interchanges. Near the 1-10 Freeway, Washington Street, Monterey Avenue, Bob Hope Drive, and Cook Street all carry in excess of 50,000 vehicles per day (VPD) with Washington Street expected to carry the highest traffic volumes (in excess of 70,000 vehicles per day), followed by Monterey Avenue (63,700 vehicles per day). Other arterial roadways projected to carry upwards of 50,000 VPD include: • SR-111 from west of Portola Avenue to the east end of the study area • Washington Street north of Varner Road • Bob Hope Drive north of Varner Road • Cook Street from Frank Sinatra Drive to Gerald Ford Drive 3-1 TABLE 3-1 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN SCENARIO TRIP-END SUMMARY NORTH DISTRICT DIFFERENCE I RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS[ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps/As) Home Based Work 9,669 21,930 -12,261 0.44 Home based Social/Recreation 10,010 16,884 -6,874 0.59 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 22,499 47,954 -25,455 0.47 Home Based School 2,911 0 2,911 N/A Non-Home Based 82,322 82,334 -12 1.00 Total 127,411 169,102 -41,691 0.75 Total Trip-Ends 296,513 MID DISTRICT DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps/As) Home Based Work 2,345 7,742 -5,397 0.30 Home based Social/Recreation 2,345 11,171 -8,826 0.21 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 5,245 33,089 -27,844 0.16 Home Based School 689 9,464 -8,775 0.07 Non-Home Based 46,862 46,844 18 1.00 Total 57,486 108,310 -50,824 0.53 Total Trip-Ends 165,796 SOUTH DISTRICT I DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps/As Home Based Work 28,106 20,139 7,967 1.40 Home based Social/Recreation 28,646 29,762 -1,116 0.96 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 64,172 74,441 -10,269 0.86 Home Based School 8,371 9,785 -1,414 0.86 Non-Home Based 118,734 118,797 -63 1.00 Total 248,029 252,924 -4,895 0.98 Total Trip-Ends 500,953 CITYWIDE TOTAL DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps/As) Home Based Work 40,120 49,811 -9,691 0.81 Home based Social/Recreation 41,001 57,817 -16,816 0.71 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 91,916 155,484 -63,568 0.59 Home Based School 11,971 19,249 -7,278 0.62 Non-Home Based 247,918 247,975 -57 1.00 Total 432,926 530,336 -97,410 0.82 Total Trip-Ends 963,262 U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xlsJT3-1 3-2 2 2.0 13 1.9 EXHIBIT 3-A 5.0 6 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN 9 .4 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) 8 2-, 1.7 2.6 7.8 .4 FR .�a 2.5 2 1 2 32.0 0 8.4 0.0 22.6 DR 0-0 .338.3 37.3.3 38-0 76 7 11.3 23.6 46A •1 49.138.9 7.5 5.6 3 2-8INSET A � 2.6 13.9 4 33.9 22.1 4.7 61.4 16.1 2.8 208.4 26.3 7 21.0 46.6 23.6 32.6 10-6 7.9 8.0 218.0 0.7 46.1 63.7 7.6 5.9 20.3 46.8 39. 1 43.0 40.1 .9 6.4 32.7 a 0.1 12.8 15.1 7.3 33_9 38.8> 40.6 31.2 29.0 33.3 2' 30.4 227.2 .8 2.5 13.1 31.9 11-8 3.3 22 24.3 25.9 22.9 8.3 15.6 3.2 ,26.9 .3 62.0 30.6 f 5.5 1.0 S 2 13.3 9.3699 �ro 13.2 21.4 cournw+aue ow 30.0 20.3s 26.0 28.9 21.5 35.1 71.1 202.5 2.0 29.4 45.5 .8 '5-2 $ 1.4 Roiev va usr � 5-9 14w2 20.5 23.9 25.1 16.7 23.1 27.1 2-3 .7 .3 5.8 3.4 4.3 sr.*e3 14GRE34""' 1.8 43.3 5-8 9-8 .7 47,6 45.5 WD wNwc ow se« 1-2 32.3 SEE INSET A 22.6 2.7 53.1 9.5 46.2 47.8 45.4 1.9 64.1 -11, 1 ° 9.0 70.4 A9 7.3 AKma. LEGEND: io.o -VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) /-,T-9 .. RO. 35 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY, Palm Desert,California-00055:Exist3 3-3 • Fred Waring Drive west of Eldorado Drive • SR-111 northwest of Fred Waring Drive 3.2 Currently Adopted General Plan Alternative Daily Level of Service Analysis Exhibit 3-13 shows the volume/capacity (V/C) ratios for the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario. Table 3-2 summarizes V/C ratios throughout the City for Currently Adopted General Plan conditions. The roadway segment locations with volume greater than capacity for the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario are shown on Table 3-3. Table 3-4 shows locations with LOS "E", and Table 3-5 shows locations with LOS "D". For the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario, 20 roadway segments and all study area freeway segments have volumes exceeding capacity, 10 segments have volumes reflecting LOS "E", and 12 segments have volume/capacity ratios reflecting LOS "D". 3-4 os 06 02 04 EXHIBIT 3-B 16 18 CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN 01.�� VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO .02 .07 .05 .05 24 �.01 .v a 00 .00 q� -05 �p 61 .02 29 a FW o�. 26 c.31 WO 1.15 .37 58 .31 .11 wcn wuua .74 P .72 78 .72 .73 11 �.24 05 74 04 53 ,, .79 71 89 .92 .981.941.14 JS 1.17 .18 .41 EL o�sEo .OB 43 INSET A Y 4 1.06 .69 .20 1.71 1.18 50 p 1.30 51 .40 nuso no. .90 .74 1.02 -20 15 .15 1.36,1. .96 89 1.22 551.41 .39 .90 1. 64 77 .12 1-34 20 1.45 94 � .40 .47 1 .65 .75 .78 91 1 .95 1.42 60 > o 1.01 .25 g 1.00 .3 FR.WMSs4�A..DR .03 .16 AV.N .76 .50 .44 .16 .30 .41+4 .84 .59 1.17 79 .06 �t 17 1.19 •42 471.34 .467 can.rnvczue oa 58 49 r 50 .56 .41 1. .67 1.37 .26 92 .15 i.16 80 .oat+ix E�zr � -69 .75 .79 .52 ; .72 p .85 ^.07 20 .66 s .11 .66 13 u•� .83 -18 ~.62 62 �. .09 87 rnrorne+coR 1.01 SEE INSET A '.71 14 63 1 02 18 .89 .92 .87 .14 1.23 1.1 1.35 4422 .14 28 `�amum on. LEGEND: OM -VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO 03 03 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY,Palm Desert,California-00055:Exist vc3 3-5 TABLE 3-2 PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE VOLUMEICAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Desert Crossingnorth of SR-111 SR-111 1,500 Collector Street 14,000 0.11 A Desert CrossingSR-111 south of SR-111 8,600 Collector Street 14,000 0.61 B Town Center W Fred WaringDr. SR-111 7,700 Scenic Secondary Roadway32,000 0.24 A El Paseo SR-111 Plaza W . 8,436 Other Roadway 32,000 0.26 A El Paseo SR-111 Portola Av. 10,115 Other Roadway 52,000 0.19 A Plaza W . Shopping Center SR-111 4,500 Collector Street 14,000 0.32 A Monterey Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 46,074 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 D Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 52,975 Arterial Street 52,000 1.021 F Monterey Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. 63,657 Arterial Street 52,000 1.221 F Monterey Av, Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 40,055 Arterial Street 52,000 0.77 C Monterey Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 31,172 Arterial Street 52,000 0.60 A Monterey Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 30,600 Arterial Street 52,000 0.59 A Monterey Av. Country Club Dr. Parkview Dr. 35,948 Arterial Street 52,000 0.69 B Monterey Av. Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 30,018 Arterial Street 52,000 0.58 A Monterey Av. Fred Warino Dr. SR-111 27,574 Arterial Street 52,000 0.53 A Monterey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 37,529 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.17 F College of the Desert north of Fred Waring Dr. Fred Warinq Dr. 4,300 Collector Street 14,000 0.31 A w Colle e of the Desert Fred Waring Dr. south of Fred Waring Dr. 681 Collector Street 14,000 0.05 A I San Pablo Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 10,000 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.31 A San Pablo Av. Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 11,300 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.35 A San Pablo Av. SR-111 El Paseo 5,600 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.18 A San Luis Rey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 6,600 Collector Street 14,000 0.47 A Portola Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 33,118 Arterial Street 52,000 0.64 B Portola Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 37,488 Arterial Street 52,000 0.721 C Portola Av. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 47,256 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 29,040 Ma or Thorou hfare 32,000 0.91 E Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 37,492 -Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.17 F Portola Av. Count Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 29,444 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.92 E Portola Av. Hovley Ln. E. Magnesia Falls Dr. 27,087 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.85 D Portola Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 22,552 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.70 B Portola Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 23,561 Ma'or Thorou hfare 32,000 0.74 C Portola Av. SR-111 El Paseo 13,000 Ma'or Thorou hfare -32,000 0.41 A Deep Canyon Rd. Ma nesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 19,800 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.62 B Deep Canyon Rd. Fred Warin Dr. SR-111 22,600 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.71 C Deep Canyon Rd. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 8,300 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A Hospitality Dr. north of SR-111 SR-111 1,919 Collector Street 14,000 0.14 A Hospitality Dr. SR-111 south of SR-111 5,900 Collector Street 14,000 0.42 A Chase School Rd, Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. 20,269 Arterial Street 52 000 0.39 A Chase School Rd. Varner Rd, 1-10 WB Rams 33,934 Arterial Street 52,000 0,651 B Cook St. 1-10 WB Ramp s 1-10 EB Rams 40,912 Arterial Street 52,000 0.791 C Cook St. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 52,743 Arterial Street 52,000 1.01 F Cook St, Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 53,333 Arterial Street 52 000 1.03 F Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 40,993 Arterial Street 52,000 0.79 C Cook St. Count Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 45,490 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 D TABLE 3-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE VOLUMEXAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS [1- 1-10 WB Rams Adams St. 21,371 Seconda Roadwa 32,000 0.67 B W/0 Bob Hoe Dr. Bob Hope Dr. 208,400 8-lane Freewa 160,500 1.30 F Ramon Rd. Montere Av. 218,000 8-lane Freewa 160,500 1.36 F Montere Av. Portola Av. 225,900 8-lane Freeway160,500 1.41 F I-10 FreewayPortola Av. Cook St. 232,700 8-lane Freewa 160,500 1.45 F 1-10 Freeway Cook St. Washington St. 227,200 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1,42 F 1-10 Freeway Washington St. E/O Washington St. 202,500 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.26 F Country Club Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av. 30,031 Arterial Street 52,000 0.58 A Country Club Dr, Montere Av. Portola Av. 20,253 Arterial Street 52,000 0.39 A Country Club Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 25,980 Arterial Street 52,000 0.50 A Country Club Dr, I Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 28,901 Arterial Street 52,000 0.56 A Count Club Dr. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 21,468 Arterial Street 52,000 0.41 A Country Club Dr, Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 35,083 Arterial Street 52,000 0.67 B Country Club Dr. Washington St. Av.42 23,823 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.74 C Hovley Ln, E. Portola Av. Cook St. 15,800 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.49 A Hovley Ln, E. Cook St, Eldorado Dr. 20,530 a'or Thoroughfare 32,000 0.64 B Hovley Ln. E. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr, 23,865 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.75 C Hovley Ln, E. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 16,688 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.52 A w Av.42 Washington St. Adams St. 23,100 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.72 C co Ma nesia Falls Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 5,775 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.18 A Magnesia Falls Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 3 400 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.11 A Painters Path Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 2,800 Collector Street 14,000 0.20 A Parkview Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. 8,852 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.28 A Parkview Dr. Monterey Av. I College of the Desert 8,400 SecondaryRoadway32 000 0.26 A Fred WaringDr. SR-111 Montere Av. 23,387 Arterial Street 52,000 0.45 A Fred Waring Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert 37,294 Arterial Street 52,000 0.72 C Fred Waring Dr. College of the Desert San Pablo Av. 37,966 Arterial Street 52,000 0.73 C Fred WaringDr. San Pablo Av. Portola Av. d44.038 9,623 Arterial Street 52,000 0.76 C Fred WaringDr. Portola Av. Dee Canyon Rd. 8,900 Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C Fred Warin Dr. Dee Canyon Rd. Cook St. 7,600 Arterial Street 52,000 0.92 E Fred WaringDr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 6,073 Arterial Street 52.000 0.89 D Fred WaringDr. Eldorado Dr. California Dr. 5,288 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 D Fred WaringDr, California Dr. Warner Tr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.85 D Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. Washington St. 53,138 Arterial Street 52,000 1.021 F Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 33,937 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 1.06 F SR-111 Bob Hoe Dr, Parkview Dr, 67,247 Arterial Street 52,000 1.29 F SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 59,582 Arterial Street 52,000 1.15 F SR-111 Fred Waring Dr. Desert Crossing 40,403 Arterial Street 52,000 0.78 C SR-111 Desert Crossing El Paseo/Town Center W . 41,047 Arterial Street 52,000 0.79 C SR-111 El Paseo/Town Center W . Plaza W . 36,991 Arterial Street 52,000 0.71 C SR-111 Plaza W . Monterey Av. 38,903 Arterial Street 52,000 0,751 C SR-111 Monterey Av. I San Pablo Av. 46,410 Arterial Street 52,000 0.891 D SR-111 San Pablo Av, ISan Luis Re Av. 48,066 Arterial Street 52,000 0,92 E SR-111 San Luis Rey Av. Portola Av. 50,948 Arterial Street 52,000 1 0.98 E TABLE 3-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Cook St. Hovlev Ln, E. Fred VJ;;rinn Dr. 34,302 Arterial Street 52,000 0.66 B Cook St. Fred WaringDr. SR-111 32,695 Arterial Street 52,000 0.63 B Cook St. SR-111 Fairwav Dr. 7,300 Arterial Street 52,000 0.141 A Emerald Desert Dr. Kalahari Desert Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 2,200 Collector Street 14,000 0.161 A Eldorado Dr, Frank Sinatra Dr, Count Club Dr. 3,200 Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln.E. 7,759 Arterial Fred Street 52,000 0.15 A Eldorado Dr. Via Toscana HovlFred In. E. Pisa 2,749 Collector Street 14,000 0.20 A Warin Dr. SR- 9,472 Arterial Street 52,000 0.18 A Eldorado Dr. SR-111 Fairwa Dr. 9,001 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.28 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. Ramon Rd. 2,757 Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 A Oasis Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 5,200 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.16 A Washin ton St. Av.38 Varner Rd. 62,030 Arterial Street 52,000 1.19 F Washin ton St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 69,872 Arterial Street 52 000 1.34 F Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams CountryClub Dr. 71,124 Arterial Street 52,000 Washington St. Count Club Dr. Hovle 1.37 F Ln. E. 41.372 Arterial Street 52,000 . C Washington St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Waring Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0,83 D Washington St. Fred Warin Dr, SR-111 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 D Dillon Rd. Hot S rin s Rd. Thousand Palms Canyont4i Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 A Ramon Rd. Bob Hoe Dr. 1-10 EB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 D v Ramon Rd. I-10 EB Rams I-10 WB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 0.53 A Ramon Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Varner Rd. , Arterial Street 52,000 0.53 A Ramon Rd, Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 20,986 Arterial Street 52,000 0.40 A Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. Chase School Rd. 10,627 Arterial Street 52,000 an A Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av, 46,791 Arterial Street 52 000 0.90 D Dinah Shore Dr. MontereyAv. Portola Av, 39,309 SecondaryRoadway- 32,000 1.23 F Gerald Ford Dr. Bob Hope Dr. MontereyAv, 38,809 Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C Gerald Ford Dr. MontereyAv. Portola Av. 40,576 Arterial Street 52,000 0.78 C Gerald Ford Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 33,277 Arterial Street 52,000 0.64 B Gerald Ford Dr. Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. 11,830 SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.37 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 24,309 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.76 C Frank Sinatra Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 25,920 Arterial Street 52,000 0.50 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Portola Av. Cook St, 22,874 Arterial Street 52,000 =0.41 Frank Sinatra Dr. Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. 8,259 Arterial Street 52,000 Frank Sinatra Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Eldorado Dr. 15,627 Arterial Street 52,000 Av. 38 Varner Rd. Washington St. 26,907 Major Thoroughfare 32 000 Tamarisk Row Dr, Eldorado Dr. Count Club Dr. 13,249 Major Thoroughfare 32,000Varner Rd. Montere Av. 1-10 WB Ram at Montere 30,697 Seconda Roadwa 32,000 Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramv at Monterey Portola Av. 17,626 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.55 A Varner Rd. Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola 43,024 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.34 F Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola Chase School Rd. 30,141 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.94 E Varner Rd. Chase School Rd. Av.38 30,359 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.95 E Varner Rd. Av.38 I-10 WB On Ram at Washin ton 5,320 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.17 A Varner Rd. 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washin t Washington St. 13,330 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1 0.42 A Varner Rd. Washington St. 1-10 WB Rams 29,322 Arterial Street 62,000 1 0.47 A TABLE 3-3 PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY(LOS"F") FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 52,975 Arterial Street 52,000 1.02 F Monterey Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. 63,657 Arterial Street 52,000 1.22 F Monterey Av, SR-111 El Paseo 37,529 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.17 F Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 37,492 Ma'or Thoroughfare 32,000 1.17 F Cook St. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 52,743 Arterial Street 52,000 1.01 F Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 53,333 Arterial Street 52,000 1 1.03 F Washington St. Av. 38 Varner Rd. 62,030 Arterial Street 52,000 1.19 F Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 69,872 Arterial Street 52,000 1.34 F Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr. 71,124 Arterial Street 52,000 1.37 F Dinah Shore Dr, Monterey Av. Portola Av. 39,309 Secondary oadway 32,000 1.23 F Varner Rd. Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola 43,024 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.34 F Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. Washington St. 53,138 Arterial Street 52,000 1.02 F Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 33,937 Major Thor ou hfare 32,000 1.06 F w SR-1 11 Bob Hope Dr. Parkview Dr. 67,247 Arterial Street 52,000 1.29 F SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 59,582 Arterial Street 52,000 1,15 F o SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. P2.ep Canyon Rd. 59,209 Arterial Street 52,000 1.14 F SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 59,114 Arterial Street 52,000 1 1.14 F SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St. 60,833 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 64,077 Arterial Street 52,000 1.23 F SR 111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. 70,426 Arterial Street 52,000 1.35 F U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T3-3 TABLE 3.2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS_ SR-111 Portola Av. EI Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 49.056 Arterial Street 52,000 0.941 E SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 59,209 Arterial Street 52,000 1.141 F SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 59,114 Arterial Street 52,000 1.141 F SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St. 60,833 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 64,077 Arterial Street 52,000 1.23 F SR-1 11 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. 70,426 Arterial Street 52,000 1.35 F Mesa View Dr. SR-74 Portola Av, 3,500 S econdary Roadway 32,000 0.11 A Haystack Rd. SR-74 Portola Av. 929 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.03 A 42nd Av. Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. 2,292 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.07 A Hovley Ln.West Monterey Av. Portola Av. 2,026 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.06 A 35th Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Unnamed Rd. 15,177 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.47 A Lucas Way Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 3,930 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.12 A Unnamed Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 6,391 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.20 A California Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. 1,197 Collector Street 14,000 0.09 A Warner Tr. Av,of the States Fred Waring Dr. 8,659 Collector Street 14,000 0.62 B Bob Ho e Dr. 18th Av. 20th Av. 5,869 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.18 A w Bob Hoe Dr. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 7,779 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.24 A I Bob Hope Dr. 22nd Av. 30th Av. 7 004 Collector Street 14,000 0.50 A Dillon Rd. 18th Av. Dowell Ln. 1,916 Arterial Street 52,000 0.04 A 20th Av. Bob Hoe Dr. Dowell Ln. 2,115 SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.07 A 22nd Av. Bob Hoe Dr. Dowell Ln. 119 SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.00 A Dowell Ln. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 405 SecondaryRoadwa 32,000 0.01 A Dillon Rd. 20th Av. Dowell Ln. 1,937 JArterial Street 52,000 0.041 A 20th Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 1,702 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.05 A 22nd Av, Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 64 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.00 A Dillon Rd. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 2,629 Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 1,816 Arterial Street 52,000 0.03 A Dillon Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. n/o Dillon Rd. 1,237 Arterial Street 52,000 0.02 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. Dillon Rd. 1,616 Collector Street 14,000 0.11 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. s/o 26th Av. 2,757 Collector Street 14,& 01 0.201 A 26th Av. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. e/o Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 1,140 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.04 A U;\UcJobs\00055\Excell(00055-04.xls)T3-2 TABLE 3-5 PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE"D" FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY I V/C LOS Montere Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 46,074 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 E Portola Av. Hovley Ln, E. Ma nesia Falls Dr. 27,087 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.85 E Cook St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln, E. 45,490 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 E Washington St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Waring Dr. 43,255 Arterial Street 52,000 0.83 E Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 45,351 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 E Ramon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 EB Rams 46,585 Arterial Street 52,000 1 0.90 E Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 46,791 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 E Av, 38 Varner Rd. Washington St. 26,907 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.84 E Fred Waring Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 46,073 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 E Fred Warin Dr. Eldorado Dr. California Dr. 45,288 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 E Fred WaringDr. California Dr. Warner Tr. 44,038 Arterial Street 52,000 0.85 E SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. 46,410 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 E w i N U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T3-5 TABLE 3-4 PALM DESERT CURRENTLY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE"E" FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C I LOS Tortola Av. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 47,256 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr, Frank Sinatra Dr. 29,040 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.91 E Tortola Av. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 29,444 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.92 E Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey 30,697 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.96 E Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ram at Portola Chase School Rd. 30,141 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.94 E Varner Rd, Chase School Rd. Av, 38 30,359 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1 0.95 E Fred Waring Dr. Deep Canyon Rd. Cook St. 47,600 Arterial Street 52,000 0.92 E SR-111 San Pablo Av. San Luis Rey Av. 48,066 Arterial Street 52,000 0.92 E SR-111 San Luis Rey Av. Portola Av, 50,948 Arterial Street 52,000 0.98 E SR-111 Portola Av. EI Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 49,056 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E U,\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T3-4 w 4.0 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Table 4-1 contains trip generation for the Preferred alternative. The Preferred scenario generates approximately 86,000 more trips than the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario. In the north and mid districts, more trips are produced (reflecting an increase in housing) for this scenario. The south district shows an increase in trips attracted for social/recreation and shopping/personal business reasons. The imbalance between productions and attractions (while still substantial) is less in the Preferred plan than the Currently Adopted General Plan. A large portion of the imbalance is in the mid district. The mid district includes University Park, which is planned to encourage use of alternative travel modes. Bus routes and bike paths will be designed to provide access from the high density residential areas and nearby commercial to the planned University. While the model is not intended to reflect vehicle trip reduction characteristics associated with the benefits of such a system combined with the proper mix of land uses, an especially well developed non-motorized transportation system could potentially reduce vehicle traffic substantially. 4.1 Preferred Alternative Daily Traffic Volumes For the Preferred alternative, daily traffic volume refinement calculations are included as Appendix "F". As described in the methodology section, growth adjustment volumes were developed for the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario that ensured that no negative growth occurred within the study area. The same adjustments have then been applied to this scenario. A small number of locations (7 total) experience slight volume decreases, with the largest decrease compared to existing 2002 conditions occurring on Magnesia Falls Drive between Portola Avenue and Deep Canyon Road (approximately -500 vehicles per day). Exhibit 4-A shows the resulting daily traffic volume forecasts. Roadways carrying in excess of 50,000 vpd include: • Washington Street from Avenue 38 to Country Club Drive • SR-111 northwest of Fred Waring Drive 4-1 TABLE 4-1 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE "PREFERRED"SCENARIO TRIP-END SUMMARY NORTH DISTRICT I DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS Ps Home Based Work 14,788 22,848 -8,060 0.65 Home based Social/Recreation 15,859 16,716 -857 0.95 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 35,733 49,927 -14,194 0.72 Home Based School 4,556 0 4,556 N/A Non-Home Based 84,347 84,382 -35 1.00 Total 155,283 173,873 -18,590 0.89 Total Trip-Ends 329,156 MID DISTRICT I DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS Ps-As Ps/As Home Based Work 3,411 5,807 -2,396 0.59 Home based Social/Recreation 3,610 9,272 -5,662 0.39 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 8,121 33,494 -25,373 0.24 Home Based School 1,041 11,750 -10,709 0.09 Non-Home Based 42,123 42, 332 -9 1.00 Total 58,306 102,455 -44,149 0.57 Total Trip-Ends 160,761 SOUTH DISTRICT DIFFERENCE1 RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS Ps-As Ps/As Home Based Work 29,208 20,684 8,524 1.41 Home based Social/Recreation 29,812 34,354 -4,542 0.87 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 66,796 89,845 -23,049 0.74 Home Based School 8,711 10,009 -1,298 0.87 Non-Home Based 135,1701 135,167 3 1.00 Total 269,697 290,059 -20,362 0.93 Total Trip-Ends 559,756 CITYWIDE TOTAL DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE ��AT�TRACTIONS Ps-As Ps/As Home Based Work 47,407 49,339 -1,932 0.96 Home based Social/Recreation 49,281 60,342 11,061 0.82 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 110,650 173,266 -62,616 0.64 Home Based School 14,308 21,759 -7,451 0.66 Non-Home Based 261,640 261,681 -41 1.00 Total 483,286 566,387 -83,101 0.85 Total Trip-Ends 1,049,673 U:\U cJ obs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xis]T4-1 4-2 2.2 t-7 .5 EXHIBIT 4-A 52 5.1.e PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 2.4 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) 70 23 22 .3 8.5 17 w a 6 .2 3.7 8-2 1.5 N4 : 3.7 °10.2 24.3 6 24 4 39.0 ` 40.039.0 39.3 1.012.9 4.3 1.3 29.7 47.2 48.7 9.160.4 39.1 6.3 52.1 3. 4.4 2.9 15.2 5.3 22.7 55.6 17.1 4.4 61.5 269 211.0 8. 22.9 15.8 7.1 3.2 34.3 9.6 9 5 221.1 .b 29.2 47.5 64.9 7.3 9_4 30.8 49.7 37. 34.4 44.7 42.2 B .6 2 4.9 1.6 14.1 1. 2 2.0 46.1 41.3 43.6 34.4 30.9 2_ 2.9 x 6.7 .1 7 4 15.0 s .1 16.2 -s--m 60.6 2.1 - 24.9 27.5 26.1 8.2 17.4 15. 24.7 2 9.5 46.4 _3 .314.9 2.7 0.9 72.6 15.0 22.5 caa.rm aue ow 33.4 25.0 2B.4 33.7 25.0 39.8 - 04.7 ^�^ST b 74.8 2.4 31.3 1'2 10.9 6.3 46.8 •vtn u•asr y 9.0 14�2r 28.0 1 27.9 18.7 22.2 28.4 3_6 .8 .8 n .v.or 2.0 37.3 .6 45.2 6.6 9.5 1p 9.0 43.9 52.9 vA[nvuw M 15 33.5 W SEE INSET A .4 35.7 54.8 48.7 49.9 47.5 .8 1 65.8 9,7»,,, 6).262.1 9.5 72.0 5.9� 7., LEGEND: 1.7 10.0 -VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) v.-zr.0 no. 2.9 ems.+n+ai PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY,Palm Desert,Califomia-00055:pref3 4-3 • SR-111 east of San Luis Rey Avenue • Bob Hope Drive North of the 1-10 Freeway • Monterey Avenue south of the 1-10 Freeway • Cook Street from the 1-10 Freeway to Frank Sinatra Drive • Fred Waring Drive from Cook Street to Eldorado Drive 4.2 Preferred Alternative Daily Level of Service Volume/Capacity (V/C) ratios for the Preferred Scenario are shown on Exhibit 4- B. Table 4-2 contains the supporting calculations. Table 4-3 lists roadways with forecast volume exceeding capacity (LOS "F"), Table 4-4 presents locations where the V/C ratio reflects LOS "E", and Table 4-5 shows segments with LOS "D". As shown on the tables, 23 roadway segments have volume in excess of capacity (as do all study area freeway segments), 12 segments have LOS "E" operations, and 13 segments experience LOS "D" conditions. 4.3 Preferred Alternative Peak Hour Analysis Peak hour intersection analysis has been performed for the Preferred Scenario only. Future forecast intersection volumes are shown on Exhibits 4-C through 4- H. Forecast intersection volumes have been extracted from the model and reviewed for reasonableness and adjusted as necessary. Appendix "G" contains the final refined peak hour volume forecast review. One intersection where the current forecasts differ notably from recently published forecasts is Dinah Shore Drive at Monterey Avenue. The eastbound left turns at this location are substantially lower in both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic. This difference is caused by a number of factors, including the improvements at the Bob Hope Drive / 1-10 interchange (not previously included in the model), increased congestion on the 1-10 Freeway itself (as reflected in the regional model data that has been incorporated into the subarea model), and 4-4 05 EXHIBIT 4-B 167 02 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE 19 05 .02 VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO 03 .09Y .07 .06 26 §.02 02 .01 .07 ).5,9 .03 1.32 76 t 17 0. .19 rntDw,Ai� 62 7 31 -75 .77 P .75 .75 3 r 1 =-25 W .07 .40 .76 .04 .80 871 § .91 1.00 .941.16 75 1.22 20 40 INSET A .09 .47 4 8 1-10 71 .31 1.74 1.18 .53 p 1.31 .52 .44 n wore nD. .90 73 1.07 .30 .18 1.38 , 91 °9 .91 1.43 1.25 54 .59 .96 1.1 .66 81 12 1.40.14 1.46.,8 .36 93 89 am,lopo .79 84 _97 .66 1.42 63 5 19 1.17 .12 +� 29 a 1.07 .51 =wn.cs.umADw. •17 .15 +v.s .78 .53 .50 .16 .34 ,4 ..,� .77 1.23 20 121 8.06 S 47 °9w .47 `50 1.40 COtM11V pUB DR u 70 64 .48 sr .55 -65 .48 76 1.44 1.28 OS 98 21 a 20 90 NDAEY Ul FASi 75 .39 87 .85 - .87 3 .69 89 it 20 .70 AV C .32 06 72 sT ns 21 18 -87 61 v+ua+« .10 .64 84 1.02 nED wADND tw. 1.05 SEE INSET A 73 t3 .69 1.05 .19 96 .91 sA,, t 16421 .14 .30 1 3 -26 LEGEND: o.as -VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO 05 .09 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE T FFIC STUDY,JPalm Desert,California-00055:Pref vc3 4-5 TABLE 4-2 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Desert Crossin north of SR-111 SR-111 1.512 Collector Street 14,000 0.11 A Desert Crossin SR-111 Isouth of SR-111 8,600 Collector Street 14,000 0.61 B Town Center W Fred Warin Dr. SR-111 8,156 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.25 A El Paseo SR-111 1 Plaza W . 8,946 Other Roadway 32,000 0.28 A El Paseo SR-111 Portola Av. 11,038 Other Roadway 52,000 0.21 A Plaza W . Shopping Center SR-111 4,509 Collector Street 14,000 0.32 A Monterey Av, Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 47,451 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Monterey Av. I-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 53,765 Arterial Street 52,000 1.03 F Monterey Av. I-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. 44,860 Arterial Street 52,000 1.25 F Monterey Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 42,238 Arterial Street 52,000 0.81 D Monterey Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 32,943 Arterial Street 52,000 0.63 B Monterey Av. I Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 33,226 Arterial Street 52,000 0.64 B Monterey Av, lCountry Club Dr. Parkview Dr. 38,963 Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C Monterey Av. Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 32,388 Arterial Street 52,000 0.62 B MontereyAv. Fred Warin Dr. SR-111 29,738 TArterial Street 52,000 0.57 A Monterey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 39,068 1 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.22 F College of the Desert north of Fred Waring Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 4,384 Collector Street 14,000 0.31 A College of the Desert Fred Waring Dr. south of Fred Waring Dr. 1,020 Collector Street 14,000 0.07 A 4i San Pablo Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 10,153 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.32 A San Pablo Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-1� 12,863 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.40 A San Pablo Av. SR-111 El Paseo 6,268 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.20 A San Luis Rey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 6,810 Collector Street 14,000 0.49 A Portola Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 34,419 Arterial Street 52,000 0.66 B Portola Av, 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 38,957 Arterial Street 52,000 0,75 C Portola Av. I-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 48,234 Arterial Street 52,000 0,93 E Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 30,948 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.97 E Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr, Country Club Dr. 39,495 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.23 F Portola Av. Count Club Dr. Hovle Ln. E. 31,269 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.98 E Portola Av, Hovley Ln. E. Magnesia Falls Dr. 28,358 -Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.89 D Portola Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Warin Dr. 24,266 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.7611 Portola Av. Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 24,275 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0,761 C Portola Av, SR-111 El Paseo 12,955 -Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.40 A Deep Canyon Rd. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 19,538 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.61 B Deep Canyon Rd. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 23,350 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.73 C Deep Canyon Rd. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 8.464 -Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A Hospitality Dr. north of SR-111 SR-111 1,772 Collector Street 14,000 0.13 A Hos italit Dr. SR-111 south of SR-111 5,877 Collector Street 14,000 0.42 A Chase School Rd. Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. 30,818 Arterial Street 52,000 0.59 A Chase School Rd, Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 46,116 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 D Cook St. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 51,601 Arterial Street 52,000 0.99 E Cook St. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 61,962 Arterial Street 52,000 1.19 F Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 00,648 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F Cook St. lFrank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 46,389 Arterial Street 52.000 0.89 D TABLE 4-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUMEXAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Varner Rd. 1-10 WB On Ramp at Was hin ton lWashington St. 14,919 Seconda Roadway32,000 0.47 A Varner Rd. Washington St. I-10 WB Rams 30,883 Arterial Street 63,000 0.50 A Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Adams St. 22,481 I Seconda Roadway 32,000 0.70 B 1-10 Freeway W/O Bob Hope Dr. Bob Hope Dr. 211,000 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.31 F 1-10 Freeway Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. 221.100 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.38 F 1-10 Freeway Monterey Av. Portola Av. 224,400 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.43 F 1-10 Freeway Portola Av. Cook St. 234,400 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.46 F 1-10 Freeway Cook St. Washington St. 227,800 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.42 F 1-10 Freeway Wash' ton St. E/O Washington St. 204,700 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.28 F Country Club Dr, Bob Ho e Dr. Monterey Av. 33,380 Arterial Street 52.000 0.64 B Country Club Dr. I Monterey Av. Portola Av. 25,025 Arterial Street 52,000 0.48 A Country Club Dr. ggjEldorado ortola Av. Cook St. 28,421 Arterial Street 52,000 0.55 A Count Club Dr. ook St. Eldorado Dr. 33,705 Arterial Street 52,000 0.65 B Count Club Dr. Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 24,956 Arterial Street 52,000 0.48 A Count Club Dr. asis Club Dr. Washin ton St. 39,771 Arterial Street 52,000 0.76 C Count Club Dr. ashin ton St. Av.42 25,522 Ma'or Thorou hfare 32,000 0.80 C Hovle Ln. E. Portola Av. Cook St. 14,200 Seconda Roadwa 32,000 0.44 A Hovle Ln. E. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 22,777 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.71 C ,p Hovley Ln. E. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 27,123 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.85 D I Hovley Ln. E. Oasis Club Dr. Washin ton St.co Av.42 Washington St. Adams St. 18,740 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.59 A 25,842 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.81 D Ma nesia Falls Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 6,564 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.21 A Magnesia Falls Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 2,881 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.09 A Painters Path Fred Waring Dr. 3R-111 2,800 Collector Street 14,000 0.20 A Parkview Dr, SR-111 Monterey Av. 9,601 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.30 A Parkview Dr. Monterey Av. Colle e of the Desert 8,277 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0,26 A Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 Monterey Av. 24,471 Arterial Street 52,000 0,47j A Fred Waring Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert 38,979 Arterial Street 52,000 0.751 C Fred Waring Dr. College of the Desert San Pablo Av. 39,258 Arterial Street 52,000 0,75 C Fred Waring Dr. San Pablo Av, Portola Av. 40,991 Arterial Street 52,000 0.79 C Fred Waring Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 40,967 Arterial Street 52,000 0.79 C Fred Waring Dr. Deep Canyon Rd. Cook St. 49,749 Arterial Street 52,000 0.96 E Fred Waring Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 47,399 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Fred WaringDr. Eldorado Dr, California Dr. 47,022 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D Fred Waring Dr. California Dr. Warner Tr, 45,475 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 D Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. Washington St. 54,770 Arterial Street 52.000 1.05 F Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 35,240 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.10 F SR-111 Bob Hoe Dr. Parkview Dr. 68,587 Arterial Street 52,000 1.32 F SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 60,584 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F SR-111 Fred Waring Dr. Desert Crossing 40,966 Arterial Street 52,000 0,79 C SR-111 Desert Crossing El Paseo/Town Center W . 41,620 Arterial Street 52,000 0.80 C SR-111 EI Paseo/Town Center W Plaza W 37,052 Arterial Street 52,000 0.71 C SR-111 Plaza W Montere Av. 39,065 Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C TABLE 4-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/CF LOS Cook St. !Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 51,236 1 Arterial Street 52.000 0.99 E Cook St. Hoviey Ln. E. Fred Waring Dr. 37,263 Arterial Street 52,000 0.72 C Cook St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 35,707 Arterial Street 52,000 0.69 B Cook St. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 7,121 Arterial Street 52,000 0,14 A Emerald Desert Dr. Kalahari Desert Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 2,132 Collector Street 14,000 0.15 A Eldorado Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr, Country Club Dr. 3.304 Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 10,884 Arterial Street 52,000 0.21 A Via Toscana Hovley Ln. E. Pisa 2,843 Collector Street 14,000 0.20 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 9,651 Arterial Street 52,000 0.19 A Eldorado Dr. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 9,523 1 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.30 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. Ramon Rd. 4,363 Arterial Street 52,000 0.08 A Oasis Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 6,281 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.20 A Washington St. Av.38 Varner Rd. 62,745 Arterial Street 52,000 1.21 F Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 72,613 Arterial Street 52,000 1.40 F Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr. 74,786 Arterial Street 52,000 1.44 F Washington St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 43,769 Arterial Street 52,000 0.84 D Washington St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Warinq Dr. 45,151 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 D Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 46,695 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D i Dillon Rd. Hot Springs Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 3,658 Arterial Street 52,000 0.07 A v Ramon Rd, Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 EB Rams 47.053 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D Ramon Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 1-10 WB Rams 28,475 Arterial Street 52,000 0.55 A Ramon Rd. I-10 WB Rams Varner Rd. 28,475 Arterial Street 52,000 0.55 A Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. MontereyAv. 22,888 Arterial Street 52,000 0.44 A Ramon Rd, MontereyAv. Chase School Rd. 15,819 Arterial Street 52,000 0.30 A Dinah Shore Dr, Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av. 46,798 1 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D Dinah Shore Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 37,127 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.16 F Gerald Ford Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av, 39,837 Arterial Street 52,000 0.77 C Gerald Ford Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 43,633 Arterial Street 52,000 0.84 D Gerald Ford Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 34,428 Arterial Street 52,000 0.66 B Gerald Ford Dr. Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. 16,215 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.51 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av. 24,918 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0,78 C Frank Sinatra Dr, Monterey Av. Portola Av. 27,522 Arterial Street 52,000 0.53 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 26,142 Arterial Street 52,000 0.50 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. 8,240 Arterial Street 52,000 0.16 A Frank Sinatra Dr, Gerald Ford Dr. Eldorado Dr. 17,432 Arterial Street 52,000 0.34 A Av. 38 Varner Rd. Washin ton St. 24,652 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.77 C Tamarisk Row Dr. Eldorado Dr, Country Club Dr. 14,998 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.47 A Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey 29,205 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.91 E Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ram at-Monterey Portola Av. 17,326 Secondary Roadway 32.000 0.54 A Varner Rd. Portola Av. I-10 WB Ramp at Portola 44,711 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.40 F Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola Chase School Rd. 32,039 -Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.00 E Varner Rd. Chase School Rd. Av. 38 37,399 secondary Roadway 32,000 1.17 F Varner Rd. 1Av. 38 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washin ton 6,341 nu 32,000 0.20 A TABLE 4-3 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY(LOS--F--) FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECASTJ CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramps 1-10 EB Ramps 53,765 Arterial Street 52,000 1.03 F Montere Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. 64,860 Arterial Street 52,000 1.25 F Monterey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 39,068 Ma'or Thoroughfare 32,000 1.22 F Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 39,495 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.23 F Cook St. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 61,962 Arterial Street 52,000 1.19 F Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 60,648 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F Washington St. Av. 38 Varner Rd. 62,745 Arterial Street 52,000 1.21 F Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 72,613 Arterial Street 52,000 1.40 F Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr. 74,786 Arterial Street 52,000 1.44 F Dinah Shore Dr. Monterey Av, Portola Av. 37,127 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.16 F Varner Rd. Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola 44,711 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.40 F Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola Chase School Rd. 32,039 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.00 E t�- Varner Rd. Chase School Rd. Av. 38 37,399 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.17 F Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. Washin ton St. 54,770 Arterial Street 52,000 1.05 F c Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 35,240 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.10 F SR-111 Bob Hope Dr. Parkview Dr. 68,587 Arterial Street 52,000 1.32 F SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Warinq Dr. 60,584 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F SR-111 San Luis Rey Av, Portola Av. 52,079 Arterial Street 52,000 1.00 E SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 60,393 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 60,212 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F SR-111 Hos.pitality Dr. Cook St. 62,028 Arterial Street 52,000 1.19 F SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 65,813 Arterial Street 52,000 1.27 F SR-111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. 72,030 Arterial Street 52,000 1.39 F U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls)T4-3 TABLE 4-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS SR-111 Monterey Av. fSan Pablo Av. 47,173 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E SR-111 San Pablo Av. Luis Re Av. 48,670 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E SR-111 San Luis Re Av. ola Av. 52,079 Arterial Street 52,000 1.00 E SR-111 Portola Av. El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 49,077 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd, 60,393 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hos2itality Dr. 60,212 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St, 62,028 Arterial Street 52,000 1.19 F SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 65,813 Arterial Street 52,000 1.27 F SR-111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. 72,030 Arterial Street 52,000 1.39 F Mesa View Dr. SR-74 Portola Av. 3,703 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.12 A Haystack Rd. SR-74 Portola Av, 964 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.03 A 42nd Av. Hovley Ln.E. Cook St. 3,596 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.11 A g5h Ln.West Montere Av. Portola Av. 2,445 Seconda Roadway32,000 0.08 A v. Dinah Shore Dr. Unnamed Rd. 14,089 SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.44 A Wa Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 3,777 Seconda Roadwa 32,000 0.12 A ed Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 4,560 Seconda Roadwa 32,000 0.14 A nia Dr. Fred Warin Dr. Warner Tr. 1,454 Collector Street 14,000 0.10 A Tr. Av.of the States Fred Waring Dr. 8,951 Collector Street 14,000 0.641 B Bob Hope Dr. 18th Av, 20th Av. 6,063 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.19 A Bob Hoe Dr. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 8,462 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A Bob Hope Dr. 22nd Av. 30th Av. 8.194 Collector Street 14,000 0.59 A Dillon Rd. 18th Av. Dowell Ln. 2,450 Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 A 20th Av. Bob Hoe Dr. Dowell Ln. 2,802 econdary Roadway 32,000 0.09 A 22nd Av. Bob Hoe Dr, Dowell Ln. 600 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.02 A Dowell Ln. 20th Av. 22nd Av, 658 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.02 A Dillon Rd. 20th Av. Dowell Ln. 2,416 JArterial Street 52,000 0.05 A 20th Av, Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 2,150 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.07 A 22nd Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 161 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.01 A Dillon Rd. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 3,257 Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A Eldorado Dr, Fred Waring Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 2,582 Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 A Dillon Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. n/o Dillon Rd. 1,506 Arterial Street 52,000 0.03 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. Dillon Rd. 2,594 Collector Street 14,000 0.19 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av, IS/0 I4,363 Collector Street 14,000 0.31 A 26th Av. Thousand Palms Can on Rd. e/o Thousand Palms Can on Rd. 1,319 1 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.04 A U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T4-2 TABLE 4-5 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE"D" FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Monterey Av, Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 42,238 Arterial Street 52,000 0.81 D Portola Av. Hovley Ln. E. Ma nesia Falls Dr. 28,358 Ma'or Thoroughfare 32,000 0.89 D Chase School Rd. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 46,116 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 D Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 46,389 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 D Washin ton St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 43,769 Arterial Street 52,000 0.84 D Washington St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Waring Dr. 45,151 Arterial Street 52,000 0.871 D Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 46,695 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D Ramon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 EB Rams 47,053 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Re Dr. Monterey Av. 46,798 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D Gerald Ford Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 43,633 Arterial Street 52,000 0.84 D Hovley Ln. E. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 27,123 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.85 D Fred Waring Dr. Eldorado Dr. California Dr. 47,022 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D Fred Waring Dr. California Dr. Warner Tr. 45,475 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 D i N U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T4-5 TABLE 4-4 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE"E" FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Monterey Av. Ivarner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 47,451 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Portola Av. 1-10 EB Ramps Gerald Ford Dr. 48,234 Arterial Street 52,000 0.93 E Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 30,948 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.97 E Portola Av, Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 31,269 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.98 E Cook St. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 51,601 Arterial Street 52,000 0.99 E Cook St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 51,236 Arterial Street 52,000 0.99 E Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey 29,205 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.91 E Fred Waring Dr. Deep Canyon Rd. Cook St, 49,749 Arterial Street 52,000 0.96 E Fred Waring Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 47,399 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. 47,173 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E SR-111 1 San Pablo Av. San Luis Rey Av. 48,670 1 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E SR-111 Portola Av. EI Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 49,077 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E a !, U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\(00055-04.xIsjT4-4 EXHIBIT 4-C AM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (Page 1 of 3) = `_"0D k-15847 oroo—1847 L558 J � � f-14 J � � i-40 } 573-J } r 133--� , } (' 21 coo 633--i o 1764-► vm.- 17� 1'4'1 ry 15-i m�Ncm UND RAMON RD./BOB HOPE DR. RAMON RD./BOB HOPE DR.& PARK VIEW DR./ SR-111 & & 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS PAINTERS PATH&SR-111 FRED WARING DR. n omiD ;k-25 vnw �-67 r-It �150 mN271 J { 248 ° 1152� 1 r 9552 ,}r 132-J } (_ 41- } (► 256-� v�. 210-1 Mnr� 39-1 nin DESERT CROSSING& EL PASEO/TOWN CENTER PLAZA WAY& MONTEREY AV.& SR-111 WAY&SR-111 SR-111 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS 0 L-448 rnmrNv �-536 0�o L-125 oNuoi �-120 J �► r-15 J L (-113 J �. �101 J +` �933 (-307 5 6 ' 7 Y03 } � ; m, 7 254 2� 9 --~7i ,rorov vo,r MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& DINAH SHORE DR. GERALD FORD DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. L 45 rs �33373 Ln �--154J L (-22 �53 J �-927 --716 (-417 18� t r 201 1 199* } r 545-► 1 r MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS& PARK VIEW DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 VARNER RD.AT MONTEREY AV. 2^ m io o�or 16 r4%D%o —976 ;�-411�4387). ^ �-c ow� A-38 f AL �151 92 81- , } 63 ' 51 1208 1280 -0 f r 60� nmco ►� COLLEGE OF THE DESERT& SAN PABLO AV.& SAN PABLO AV.& SAN LUIS REY& FRED WARING DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 SR-111 PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL Palm Desert,California-00055:122A URBAN 4-13 EXHIBIT 4-D AM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (Page 2 of 3) r �-285 NWn t--13 NnOnO �-225 r894 J L f--601 J �► �195 15 324�! � t 252- ao`rtOmm 730� ,} 636- 225- PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS GERALD FORD DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. c L �75512357 1 _96 -14201393 r1k �34 '173 I -297 83-f J fN 2� ,}r 98� 1 t 116321 kr- PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& HOVLEY LANE EAST MAGNESIA FALLS DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 4 1�g942 86 5 J—935 NLnLnL- JI I- r23 8 953-► ,r 29� ,t r 1119 67 , r 1610 , r ax. 79___� -;37- no�oa�o 47 ; o 1-10 WB RAMPS& EL PASEO/CABRILLO AV. DEEP CANYON RD.& DEEP CANYON RD.& VARNER RD.AT PORTOLA AV. & SR-111 FRED WARING DR. 511-111 M. alkn co" 6NOL aB2 �5 38 —oi7 r z'_418 �;�:202 6 706- 99;HOSPITALITY DR.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& SR-111 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS GERALD FORD DR. co v L96 o L349 (320- 254 —421 �� 1474 _J �► -43 J �► ' 21i-175 J L (-190 565 105-�1 4- 1 r162~ }> 1 94�-1 n� 167� onrn ■� COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. HOVLEY LANE EAST FRED WARING DR. PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL, Palm Desert.California-00055:1226 URBAN 4-14 EXHIBIT 4-E AM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (Page 3 of 3) r.9 �647r 1-z81 rnn�n L.qg on.- �--7 �as6 --z8o J � f-522 J _ 424 1331� ,}r 293� 732� f 314 ,r 122-� rvvnn 81-1 CO COOK ST. & GERALD FORD DR.& ELDORADO DR.& ELDORADO DR.& SR-111 FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. FRANK SINATRA DR vv�n �k-262 Jrn�i.�-► ;4-142 �► 4 3545 9 N _310 08f- u>r► ��J 0 820 516— ,} 1907; ,n t r 93q� ,}r 72� 26� vvi.- 24-i �rnoo 49 rv. r tD ELDORADO DR.& ELDORADO DR.& TAMARISK ROW DR.& OASIS CLUB DR.& HOVLEY LANE EAST SR-111 COUNTRY CLUB DR. AVENUE 42 �280 �-�3 1�5 1 8 rJ-�it � k4(o94 3 — � 1M --- f 4r_�-, _ ► -a19 1 78034 490 327-f1~ 49 -1; 2331 - WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& VARNER RD. COUNTRY CLUB DR. 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS HOVLEY LANE EAST rk-209f-318 Ji 362 395� 1 rn } r Z5� 1f vco n WASHINGTON 5T.& VARNER RD.& FRED WARING DR. 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS (at Washington St.) I PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:122C URBAN BAN 4-15 EXHIBIT 4-F PM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (Page 1 of 3) o 4-604 �^ `m"1O° �iiao n'^ �8os J � f 00 � � J1 � i-a6 Jiti-190 5wl} 656-� t r zio6� ,ii� 1}r coves e 70� inory m.- RAMON RD./BOB HOPE DR. RAMON RD./BOB HOPE DR.& PARK VIEW DR./ SR-111 & & 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS PAINTERS PATH&SR-111 FRED WARING DR. ;k-31 ri N 391vuv.- �1043 '^a, �14360 J L r 52 1 i-30z4 (� 1326� t r185-j 1331— ,}r 1320� , } r 12 t 36� n�� 34� mN 817-T o� N DESERT CROSSING& EL PASEO/TOWN CENTER PLAZA WAY& MONTEREY AV.& SR-111 WAY&SR-111 SR-111 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS �209f�-711 wmM ;"-380 m -7353a (389--) -302 J l 160° J l -965 35 i-1 -3 f-338 953� , r 1061638� } 424� 156-i ry w 141-1 �vmiv co-in �t�N MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& DINAH SHORE DR. GERALD FORD DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. (172--# N L_212 J � �► (-383962 q- MONTEREY8 ,}r 396- n�ry 1288J , } r e- � mCMn � NtOm AV.& MONTEREY AV.& MONTEREY AV.& 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS& PARK VIEW DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 VARNER RD.AT MONTEREY AV. J �► J01 ��► L 125�1616 7 9r7 56 ;2151 f-70 845 35J ? � , , r J8r$tn�1 18 5 119 6; 8 2 ~ N rn�►,/Lin-v"}41'i32nr NCO 0 3 COLLEGE OF THE DESERT& SAN PABLO AV.& SAN PABLO AV.& SAN LUIS REY& FRED WARING DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 SR-111 PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODE0 L,Palm Desert,California-00055:123A URBAN 4-16 EXHIBIT 4-G PM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (Page 2 of 3) •- m o _ uNioMODr» �331 v:Dao L55 _ ;f-239 278 �► J �► �2557 J �► � -981 152 J Z L 533� r 957- 0 t , 760 , t f 1005� 203-� nxo 153� �oT� 249� mry PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS GERALD FORD DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. �� rJ �-168 mo°fory �-347 i oN �211 �►:365 �29 J L �1692 J L t-1758 153� 1 t 1113� ,tv_ 1473� 1 t r oN ) rn 132 Nv PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& PORTOLA AV.& HOVLEY LANE EAST MAGNESIA FALLS DR. FRED WARING DR. SR-111 coves 29 �rnn 4-345 �yo L 189 4--107)0 J �► �3465f-4571 J � Asa5 148 t 1607- mt, 1831- t m —i —Nto Lnto 67--) 10= 1-10 WB RAMPS& EL PASEO/CABRILLO AV. DEEP CANYON RD.& DEEP CANYON RD.& VARNER RD.AT PORTOLA AV. & SR-111 FRED WARING DR. SR-111 � �� rovo r—+- rm 728 ^� �314 32JAL {-171Ji (-475 � �. r90 1712� t � t (' 647-J1t � 1210� wrvvi mm 778; am 236� `try r �v � r 4c HOSPITALITY DR.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& SR-111 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS GERALD FORD DR. o L131 v�m �-356 o°iov_m D uir_� �q5q (256; f-509 J rlsa J � J +600 r t r 2 � tr 86� 1134�.-rv�n NC>N COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& COOK ST.& FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. HOVLEY LANE EAST FRED WARING DR. PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:123B URBAN 4-17 PM PEAK HOUR PREFERRED H SCENARIO INTERSECTION FORECAST VOLUMES (Page 3 of 3) r-T L 377 o n _ ovin �—r-1,- 1 corn_ LgJ . f-9502 J �► —419 .� �. 43 J L f-274 1465- To o 273- 534-) 1 r 791 1 r 103-) onoNnO' COOK ST.& GERALD FORD DR.& ELDORADO DR.& ELDORADO DR.& SR-111 FRANK SINATRA DR. COUNTRY CLUB DR. FRANK SINATRA DR. �444 r)f�-268 �c+ n )Kn CooJ �► �191 J f (rrwn �123366 _!4; 1645� 1184-► 1164 76� 116-� ELDORADO DR.& ELDORADO DR.& TAMARISK ROW DR.& OASIS CLUB DR.& HOVLEY LANE EAST SR-111 COUNTRY CLUB DR. AVENUE 42 (975:; +qpp ^� --578 ,�-"Df-3339 70 J � � 170 `'151 J � L61 �oo t(� 1053-J , r560J402 mkom v o 636-- rn rn 593-►-iNorn 202� v 308� WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& WASHINGTON ST.& VARNER RD. COUNTRY CLUB DR. 1-10 EASTBOUND RAMPS HOVLEY LANE EAST —1410 (238-� L285 ro 3�l WASHINGTON ST.& VARNER RD.& FRED WARING DR. 1-10 WESTBOUND RAMPS (at Washington St.) PALM DE SERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:123C URBAN 4-18 additional congestion at the Monterey Avenue interchange due to development that is now anticipated to occur north of the 1-10 Freeway. Traffic Signal warrant analysis has been performed at intersection analysis locations that do not have existing traffic signals. Appendix "H" contains the results of this analysis. Traffic signals are warranted at all intersection analysis locations for future buildout conditions. Intersection analysis has been performed using the planned lane configurations previously described in Chapter 2. Appendix "I" contains the results of this analysis. Intersection analysis for intersection improvements to attain LOS "D" is included as Appendix "J°. Appendix "K" contains worksheets for LOS "C" or better improvements analysis. Table 4-6 summarizes intersection analysis for all intersections, including with improvements necessary to achieve LOS "C" or LOS "D". Table 4-7 lists the intersection improvements necessary to reach acceptable levels of service (either LOS "C" or LOS "D") separately. The information for the varying levels of service has been prepared based on direction received from the General Plan Advisory Committee. Based on the results of the peak hour analysis, the following intersections will require through lanes that exceed the current (and recommended) General Plan cross-section if the City wishes to retain LOS "C" as the standard at these locations: • Monterey Avenue (NS) at Dinah Shore Drive (EW) — Dinah Shore Drive will require 3 through lanes in each direction instead of 2 through lanes (Dinah Shore Drive is already designated as a 6 lane divided road west of Monterey Avenue, so this change would specifically affect Dinah Shore Drive east of Monterey Avenue. 4-19 TABLE 4-6 FUTURE PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERSECTION APPROACH LANE NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- DELAY' LEVEL O TRAFFIC' BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND SECS. SERVICE INTERSECTION CONTROL L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM Bob Hope Dr.(NS)at: 1-10 WB Ramps(EW) TS 1 3 0 0 3 1>> 0 0 0 2 0 1 -' -` F F trth LOS"D"Improvements TS 2 3 0 0 3 1>> 0 0 0 2 0 2 19.9 35.5 B D -With LOS"C"Improvements TS 2 3 0 0 3 1>> 0 0 0 2 0 1>> 20.7 33.9 C C I-10 EB Ramps(EW) TS 0 3 1 1 3 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 34.4 ` C F -14rth LOS D"Improvements TS No Intermediate LOS"D"Improvements _ -With LOS"C"tm rovements TS 0 3 1 1 2 3 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 21.3 32.2 C C Park View Dr./Painters Path(NS)at: • SR-111 (EW) TS 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 1 26.5 28.3 C C SR-111 (NS)at: Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 3 0 48.6 -' D F With LOS"D"Improvements TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 2 1> 28.9 36.2 C D With LOS"C"Im rovements TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 2 1» 29.3 34.3 C C Desert Crossing(NS)at: • SR-1 (EW TS 1.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0 1 3 1 2 3 0 34.3 34.9 C C El Paseo/Town Center Way(NS)at: • SR-111 EW TS 1.5 1.5 1 1.5 1.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 0 33.5 35.0 C C Plaza Way(NS)at: SR-111 (EW TS 1 1 1 1 0.5 1.5 2 3 0 1 3 1 19.8 29.9 B C Monterey Av.(NS)at: I-10 EB Ramps(EW) TS 0 3 1 2 2 0 2 0 1>> 0 0 0 24A 31.7 C C Dinah Shore Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 2 2 1 1 2 1» 35.0 43.8 C D5 With LOS"C"Improvements(Alt1) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 1> 1r 36 1»6 31.6 34.6 C C With LOS"C"Improvements(Alt2) TS 2 3 1 26 36 1»6 3 2 1> 1 3 1>> 29.2 34.7 C C Gerald Ford Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 33.5 29.7 C C Frank Sinatra Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 1>> 24.5 26.3 C C Country Club Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 1>> 29.9 31.7 C C Park View Dr. TS 1 3 0 2 3 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 21.5 24.4 C C Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 26.2 33A C C 0 WEI TS 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 33F 1 34.9 C C I-10 WB Ramps(NS)at: Varner at MontereyAv. EW TS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 EO E20 17.3 C B College of the Desert(NS)at:• Fred Warin Dr. EW TS 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 1 1 3 0 23.8 C C San Pablo Av.(NS)at: Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 27.5 34.0 C C SR-111 EW TS 1 2 1 1 2 1>> 2 3 1 2 3 1 30.1 33.0 C C San Luis Rey(NS)at: SR-111 EW TS 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 30.0 24.8 C C Portola Av.(NS)at: 1-10 EB Ramps(EW) TS 0 3 1 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 18.8 23.7 B C Gerald Ford Dr.(EW) TS 2 2 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 26.3 31.4 C C Frank Sinatra Dr.(EW) TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 25.9 31.3 C C Country Club Dr.(EW) TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 29.9 34.1 C C Hovley Ln.E.(EW) TS 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 20.2 25.2 C C Magnesia Falls Dr.(EW) TS 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 34.6 30.9 C C Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 1 2 1>> 1 2 1» 2 3 1 2 2.5 1.5 25.5 28.8 C C SR-111 EW TS 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 33.8 29.1 C C 1-10 WS Ramps(t at: Vamer Rd.at Portola Av. EW TS 1.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 13.2 15.4 B B El Paseo/Cabrillo Av.(NS)at: SR-111 EW TS 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 3 0 27.5 33.4 C C Deep Canyon Rd.(NS)at: Fred Waring Dr.(EW) TS 1 2 1>> 3 2 0 1 3 1 2 3 1 33.4 33.0 C C SR-111 EW) TS 1 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 0 1 3 1 32.9 33.1 C C Hospitality Dr.(NS)at: • SR-111 (EW) TS 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 0 28.6 26.3 C C 4-20 C ISO 0 . . . . m 0 pn C CD m II M r N (n �.3 _ T n • - < N 2 ' n v�i Cn m -n n p -n m ' Cn ' _T ' _ n SS T ' ' ' - -8 3 a C CD ' c o 7 O< O N ,ZJ O N O ¢� '� O D 1 o m O < I c o a c < c d a < c a <m �. D d m � � w �� ° � � � c � � mt; n cg � n j� x � oxTaSro � � x � azr3m � V� N G S =• O War, r r r r r W r j r, r a. r (/� p (n o r -� r r r (n r m r r CO W Z o `�° m = -I "`� c �- cOOc. 0n00x0 cOnpm � � n , n0^ O Ocn03'OoQO � �7Z o a c� f cn d Z (n (n c 0 c ti(n d cn V) c c ^ O (n (n 9 (n c (n a ti (n ti d y " _ N N ? ° ac (n' (nm C� Op C' Q 0Q)-a C) m m� o � my o � d C? C; p (? m � (; ° C? pC� O� 3 °= Z y c D 7 7 3 y N N m + r 0 N Z m N m p p Z m p N y m � � � oo � m3m � (! g3` g� _ 9 � 3 3 3g _ 3' 3m33m^ 3 a � CD cL � � amati �a ti me mm M (D � m� ma my v' m z 7D m d o o `< o o 0 0 o g � g rro o � o ga � o r. o o n Cl p 0 n 7 N. Cn N m m v m V m m m � � � � " ry �"' � � � n o o' fD � � 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 v 3 o c �, n d D o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O p 3 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Z O O n 7 C (a J, a y N ti y N tii in y in in rn ti N y A N O N m � �j ^ 7`<a v < ... m (n A O t (D 6) v (D m 7 .to m C a`z (<D_O � p o 0a CD c d fD. O m -� cn Nm m �o 3 mN Z n m c ( ( n n ( ( ( ( ( n n o n ( c n o ( 3zO_ N D < O71 mm N r S Z d a N 0 W CO •i j , m J• N N W N N N N O O O N N O a N -+ N O q N N N 1J N N N N N CD O O r �a v (7D a y W Z N � - O O N• II �O N W W W W W (J W W W W W O a N N W (D q W (?,W W W (J W W W W W w W -4 0C X m y N T c N � Z -j m D II II < 5. O ! V V CD P .... p -+ p a - - - - - - O O v N w O ? oD a Z &) C N O O N o,NN NN NNN N N -+ � NNN N NN NNNNN NN N � CDr m Z 0 D me K 3 c Wcn V�i Z W � Jn.. W W q W W A W W W W W W O N N N C) W O W W W W W W W W W W W W W W --1 O 0C n m Z Z � D D y z s p p = p � m v � 0 m „� � vv000 � � C) � v v - - - - � � o 00 � Z 0 v v v O d d -4 m (D v !Zn 7 � N N N NN W W V7 tIt 7' � -+ -+ N N - -+ N N NN NNNNN NN NN � :- O r -0 Z j d W m O. > N C O O N W W W N N V1 Ul V7 N N N W W W N Cl) W W W W W W N N W w W W W O -� C0 cn _ Cn r E O p r- (n m (D CD CD 7 V V v v N V ... O .., j 0 O .� .� ... ! V v v Q 0 z C mca CD O N N NN N g000 N N ON N � � -+ N O N NN NNNN a,N qN O� O r D O co O { O N W W W W g 0 0 0 6 N W W W Ln W W W W W A W N N W q W g N 0 m 0 0 ^i C m CD 3 � Q 00 O s .� O O -+ O V V V -� m- a-a O N V V W N W W W N W W W j W W •.-� W lw W W W j W N N (� W A � W O V A W O N O (D N W -+ -+ N N �I -� O A V O W co A W W (D I D Vi W V .+ W 0 W W 0 (D V V W W Q) -a Ut 0 O (D O is 0 (O,.D1 m W U1 C11 Ql m A W �It W A W A W W W W N N -� W -+ W W W A (� (b.D O A OD. W CTIO OND A N ao 0 0 1 A I � � V W W (p W (n W A. N A � O) W to �l V W (D W w V (.M N A W O V co N V V W O A W A W N -+ W N co onn000 WW000 non nWWn W (� pl� n(� pnnnnpW T co � m < m co nn0T0ono -nnT 000 nnWn W nnnpnpnnOnOn TW �Tn 0 m TABLE 4-7 REQUIRED PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- INTERSECTION BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ( NS & EW) L I T R L T I R L T I R L T I R Ramon Rd./Bob Hope Dr. & 1-10 WB Ramps Existing Conditions 1 1 1 0 0 1 1>>l 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 RECONFIGURE INTERCHANGE Planned Buildout Improvements 1 3 0 0 3 1>> 0 0 0 2 0 1 LOS D Conditions 2 3 0 0 3 1>> 0 0 0 2 0 2 LOS C Conditions 2 3 0 0 3 1> 0 0 0 2 0 1>> Ramon Rd./Bob Hope Dr. & 1-10 EB Ramps Existing Conditions 1 0 1 1>> 1 1 0 1 1 0 1>> 0 0 0 RECONFIGURE INTERCHANGE Planned Buildout Improvements 0 3 1 1 3 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 LOS C/D Conditions 1 0 3 1 2 3 0 1.51 0 1.5 0 0 0 Park View Dr./Painters Path & SR-111 Existing Conditions 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 1 Planned Buildout Improvements _-- - -: t Final Buildout Conditions 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 1 SR-111 & Fred Waring Dr. Existing Conditions 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 0 2 3 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 3 LOS D Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 2 1> LOS C Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 2 1>> Desert Crossing & SR-111 Existing Conditions 1.5 0.5 1 0.51 0.5 0 1 1 1 3 1 12 1 3 0 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Buildout Conditions 1.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 0 1 1 3 1 2 3 0 El Paseo/Town Center W . & SR-111 Existing Conditions 1.51 1.51 1 1 1.51 1.51 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 1 3 1 0 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Buildout Conditions 1.5 1.5 1 1 1.51 1.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 1 0 Plaza W . & SR-111 Existing Conditions 1 1 1 1 0.5 1.5 2 3 0 1 3 1 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Buildout Conditions 1 1 1 1 -2 2 3 0 1 3 1 Monterey Av. & 1-10 EB Ramps Existing Conditions 0 3 1 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 1» Final Buildout Conditions 0 3 ]-1 2 2 0 2 0 1>>l 0 r 0 0 Monterey Av. & Dinah Shore Dr. Existing Conditions 2 3 0 1 3 1>> 2 2 0 1 2 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 2 3 1 1 2 1>> LOS C Conditions (Alt 1) 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 1> 1 ' 3 1>> LOS C Conditions (Alt 2) �-2 3 1 2 3 1» 3 2 1> -1 --3 1>> Monterey Av. & Gerald Ford Dr. Existing Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 2 3 3E 3 Final Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 32 3 1 4-22 TABLE 4-7(CONTINUED) REQUIRED PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- INTERSECTION BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ( NS & EW) L T R L T R L I T R L I T I R Monterey Av. & Frank Sinatra Dr. Existing Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1>> 2 1 3 1 1>> Planned Buildout Improvements Final Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 tl>>12 1 3 1 1>> Monterey Av. & Country Club Dr. Existing Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 1>> Planned Buildout Improvements Final Buildout Conditions +-2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1> 2 3 1>> Monterey Av. & Park View Dr. Existing Conditions 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 0 3 0 2 Final Buildout Conditions 1 3 0 2 3 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 Monterey Av. & Fred Waring Dr. Existing Conditions 2 3 0 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 3 3 Final Buildout Conditions 2 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Monterey Av. & SR-111 Existing Conditions 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2- 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 3 2 3 2 13 Final Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1-10 WB Ramp&Varner Rd. at Monte re Av. Existing Conditions 1 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 0 3 1>> 2 2 0 RECONFIGURE INTERCHANGE Planned Buildout Improvements 1 0 1 2 0 1 Final Buildout Conditions 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 College of the Desert & Fred Waring Dr. Existing Conditions 0.510.51 0 0.51 0.5 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 1 3 1 3 0 Final Buildout Conditions 0.5 0.51 0 0.51 0.5 1 1 1 3 0 4 1 3 1 0 San Pablo Av. & Fred Waring Dr. Existing Conditions 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 1 =2 3 Final Buildout Conditions 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 3 1 12 3 1 San Pablo Av. &SR-111 Existing Conditions 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1» 2 1 3 1 2 3 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 1 1 1 1 E 11 Final Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1>>1 2 1 3 1 1 12 3 1 San Luis Rey&SR-111 Existing Conditions 0.5 0.51 1 1 0.51 0.51 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 T 1 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Buildout Conditions 0.5 0.51 1 10.51 0.51 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1-4 1 Portola Av. & 1-10 EB Ramps Existing Conditions Does Not Exist Planned Buildout Improvements 0 3 1 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Final Buildout Conditions 0 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 4-23 TABLE 4-7 (CONTINUED) REQUIRED PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- INTERSECTION BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ( NS & EW) L FT I R L T R L T R L I T R Portola Av. & Gerald Ford Dr. Existing Conditions 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 2 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 2 3 1>> 2 3 3 1» Final Buildout Conditions 2 2 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 1 2 3 1>> Portola Av. & Frank Sinatra Dr. Existing Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 2 3 Final Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Portola Av. & Country Club Dr. Existing Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3L 1 2 3 Final Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Portola Av. & Hovley Ln. E. Existing Conditions 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Buildout Conditions 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 Lj. 0 1 2 0 1 1 Portola Av. & Magnesia Falls Dr. Existing Conditions 1 2 0 1 2 102 1 0 1 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 2 0 Final Buildout Conditions 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 Portola Av. & Fred Waring Dr. Existing Conditions 1 2 1>> 1 2 1>> 1 2 1 1 2 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 2 3 2 3 1 Final Buildout Conditions 1 2 1>> 1 2 1>> 2 3 1 2 3 1 Portola Av. & SR-111 Existing Conditions 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 3Planned Buildout ImprovementsFinal Buildout Conditions 2 2 1 2 E2L1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1-10 WB Ramps & Varner Rd. at Portola Av. Existing Conditions Does Not Exist Planned Buildout Improvements 1.5 0 1 0.51 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 1 0 Final Buildout Conditions 1.51 0 1 0.51 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. & SR-111 Existing Conditions 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 0 3 0 Final Buildout Conditions 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 1 3 0 Deep Canyon Rd. & Fred Waring Dr. Existing Conditions 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 1>> 3 2 0 3 1 2 3 Final Buildout Conditions 1 2 1>> 3 2 0 1 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 Deep Canyon Rd. & SR-111 Existing Conditions 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 2 0 Final Buildout Conditions 1 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 0 1 3 1 Hospitality Dr. & SR-111 Existing Conditions 0.5 0.51 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 0 3 0 Final Buildout Conditions 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 3 0 1 3 0 4-24 TABLE 4-7 (CONTINUED) REQUIRED PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- INTERSECTION BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ( NS & EW) —LT-T-1 R L I T R L I T R L T I R Cook St. & 1-10 WB Ramps Existing Conditions 0 2 1>> 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 Final Buildout Conditions 0 3 1» 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Cook St. & 1-10 EB Ramps Existing Conditions 0 3 0 1 3 0 1.5 0.5 1 0 0 0 Planned Buildout Improvements LOS C/D Conditions 0 3 0 1 ]-3 0 1.5 0.5 1>> 0 0 0 Cook St. & Gerald Ford Dr. Existing Conditions 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 12 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 1 3 1» LOS C Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1> 2 1 3 1 1>>l 2 2 1> Cook St. & Frank Sinatra Dr. Existing Conditions 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 1 3 3 3 LOS C Conditions 2 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Cook St. & Country Club Dr. Existing Conditions 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 3 3 3 Final Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Cook St. & Hovley Ln. E. Existing Conditions 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 3 2 1 LOS C Conditions 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1> Cook St. & Fred Waring Dr. Existing Conditions 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 3 1>> 3 3 1>> LOS C Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1» 2 3 1 2 4 1» Cook St. & SR-111 Existing Conditions 1 2 0 1.5 1.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 LOS C Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Gerald Ford Dr. & Frank Sinatra Dr. Existing Conditions 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 3 0 Final Buildout Conditions 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 0 0 3 0 Eldorado Dr. & Country Club Dr. Existing Conditions 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 Final Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Eldorado Dr. & Frank Sinatra Dr. Existing Conditions 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 3 0 Final Buildout Conditions 1 1 1 0.5 0.51 1 1 3 1 1 3 0 Eldorado Dr. & Hovley Ln. E. Existing Conditions 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Planned Buildout Improvements 1.5 1.5 2 2 Final Buildout Conditions 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 1 2 0 0 2 10 4-25 TABLE 4-7(CONTINUED) REQUIRED PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- INTERSECTION BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND ( NS & EW) L T R L I T R L T R L T R Eldorado Dr. & SR-111 Existing Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Buildout Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 LO 1 2 1 1 2 1 Oasis Club Dr. & Country Club Dr. Existing Conditions 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 2 3 2 P31 LOS C Conditions 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 1 Oasis Club Dr. & Hovley Ln. E. Existing Conditions 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 -- j 2 1 0 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Buildout Conditions 0 0 0 1 HO 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 Washington St. &Varner Rd. Existing Conditions 2 3 1> 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 1.5 1.5 LOS C Conditions +-2 . 3 1> 2 3 1 1 2 1> 12 1 1.51 1.5 Washington St. & 1-10 EB Ramps Existing Conditions 0 3 1 2 3 0 1.5 0.51 0 0 0 Planned Buildout Improvements LOS D Conditions 0 3 1 2 3 0 1.5 0.5 1» 0 0 0 LOS C Conditions 0 3.51 1.5 2 3 0 1.5 0.5 1» 0 0 0 Washington St. & Country Club Dr. Existing Conditions 2 3 0 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 2 1 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 1 1»1 3 1 1 1 2 3 LOS C Conditions 2 3 1 2 4 1» 3 2 1 2 3 1> Washington St. & Hovley Ln. E. Existing Conditions 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 2 2 2 2 1 Final Buildout Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 Washington St. & Fred Waring Dr. Existing Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Planned Buildout Improvements 3 2 3 LOS D Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1> 2 3 1 LOS C Conditions 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1>> 2 3 1 Varner Rd. & 1-10 WB Ramps Existing Conditions 2 2 0 0 3 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 Planned Buildout Improvements Final Buildout Conditions 2 2 0 0 3 1 T2 0 1 0 0 0 ' Lanes in BOLD font imply pedestrian movements are prohibited for the movement U:\UcJ obs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T4-7 4-26 Cook Street (NS) at Fred Waring Drive (EW) — Fred Waring Drive will require a 4th westbound through lane at this location. • Washington Street (NS) at the 1-10 Freeway Eastbound Ramps — Washington Street will require a 4'h northbound through lane (that will also be shared with right turning vehicles). • Washington Street (NS) at Country Club Drive (EW) - Washington Street will require a 4th southbound through lane at this location. An alternative to physical improvements at the two Washington Street locations may be to consider reducing the intensity of development in the vicinity of the Washington Street / 1-10 Freeway interchange, particularly north of the 1-10 Freeway. 4-27 5.0 LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE Trip generation for the Less Intense alternative is shown on Table 5-1. The Less Intense alternative generates fewer trips than the Preferred scenario, but still increases trip generation over the Currently Adopted General Plan. The home based productions north of 1-10 increase substantially over the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario (but not as much as the Preferred scenario). In the south district, social/recreation and shopping/personal business attractions, and non-home based trips all increase greatly over Currently Adopted General Plan conditions (almost as much as the Preferred scenario). The ratio of productions to attractions is slightly less (showing greater imbalance) than for the Preferred scenario. 5.1 Less Intense Alternative Daily Traffic Volumes Daily traffic volume refinement calculations for the Less Intense scenario are included in Appendix "U. As described previously, growth adjustment volumes were developed for the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario that ensured that no negative growth occurred within the study area. The same adjustments have then been applied to this scenario. A small number of locations (6 total) experience slight volume decreases, with the largest decrease compared to existing 2002 conditions occurring on Magnesia Falls Drive between Portola Avenue and Deep Canyon Road (approximately -400 vehicles per day). The resulting daily volume forecasts are shown on Exhibit 5-A. Study area roadways carrying volumes greater than 50,000 are: • Washington Street from Avenue 38 to Country Club Drive • SR-111 east of San Luis Rey Avenue • SR-111 northwest of Fred Waring Drive • Bob Hope Drive north of the 1-10 Freeway • Monterey Avenue south of the 1-10 Freeway 5-1 TABLE 5-1 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE LESS INTENSE SCENARIO TRIP-END SUMMARY NORTH DISTRICT DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps/As) 11 Home Based Work 13,358 21,669 -8,311 0.62 Home based Social/Recreation 13,766 16,185 -2,419 0.85 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 30,889 49,040 -18,151 0.63 Home Based School 4,006 0 4,006 N/A Non-Home Based 81,717 81,715 2 1.00 Total 143,736 168,609 -24,873 0.85 Total Trip-Ends 312,345 MID DISTRICT I DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS I ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps/As) Home Based Work 2,998 6,583 -3,585 0.46 Home based Social/Recreation 3,086 9,041 -5,955 0.34 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 6,924 29,882 -22,958 0.23 Home Based School 896 9,649 -8,753 0.09 Non-Home Based 40,313 40,242 71 1.00 Total 54,217 95,397 -41,180 0.57 Total Trip-Ends 149,614 SOUTH DISTRICT DIFFERENCE I RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) Ps/As) Home Based Work 29,163 20,548 8,615 1.42 Home based Social/Recreation 29,752 34,014 -4,262 0.87 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 66,658 89,205 -22,547 0,75 Home Based School 8,695 10,253 -1,558 0.85 Non-Home Based 135,042 135,038 4 1.00 Total 269,310 289,058 -19,748 0.93 Total Trip-Ends 558,368 CITYWIDE TOTAL I DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps/As Home Based Work 45,519 48,800 -3,281 0.93 Home based Social/Recreation 46,604 59,240 -12,636 0.79 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 104,471 168,127 -63,656 0.62 Home Based School 13,597 19,902 -6,305 0.68 Non-Home Based 257,072 256,995 77 1.00 Total 467,263 553,064 -85,801 0.84 Total Trip Ends 1,020,327 U:\UcJ obs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T5-1 5-2 3.6 2` '5 EXHIBIT 5-A .0 LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE 2.3 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) z.7� 2.1 3.1 4 .6 ,r a 6 .1 3.5 8 1 102 34.4 1.5 .1 >vav�w oa 3.8 10.1 -23.3 60.4 24.0 2.6 .4 .4 38.7 F 39.5 > 39.1 i 39.3 nv n 5 B.1 a O 1 1.0 2.7 24.1 1.3 41.67.1 47.4 49.0 52 49.160.5 89 392 .3 .0 13. 4.1 INSET A P' 15.1 g 8 .9 21.9 55.3 4.1 61.6 15.9 209.6 S. 26.1 21.7 no. 46.7 13.8 5.1 -0 .4 8.6 219.11 9 46.4 62.4 17.8 228. 23.0 46.6 35. .8 41.9 2 43.6 6 233 7W 10.6 2.8 31.5 b 40.8 38,2 41.6 30.2 34.3 32.3 1 59, .4 226.7 0 6.1 56,1 ' 14.3 g 14.8 vwu«s�u,w on. 58.6 22 25.9 27.4 f 25.1 8.5 16.8 14.5 r 32.8 0 45.9 .2 6.3 60.5 b xr 14.8 .570.9 counm aue oR 14.5 ,1 32.3 24.6 28.5 34.1 25.2 39.8 6 2.8 x 2.5 30.7 50.7 11.0 i6.1 42.9 ww�u.:ur z 3 ta_5 7 27.7 26.8 28.2 19.33 22.0 27.7 3.7 .8 9.5 11L 2.1 8.5 s,,es 1 45.1 6.7 19.6 rawI 7 43.0 53, o r.,w ow 332 53.3 8 - SEE INSET A . 935.6 7 46.3 'S 5.9 . 9.5 .4 m477 LEGEND: 10.0 -VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) 0 JO 3 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY, Palm Desert,Cafifomia-00055:Less3 UWAIM 5-3 • Cook Street, from the 1-10 Freeway to Frank Sinatra Drive • Fred Waring Drive from Cook Street to Eldorado Drive 5.2 Less Alternative Daily Level of Service Table 5-2 contains volume/capacity calculations for the Less Intense scenario. The results of this analysis are shown on Exhibit 5-13. A summary of roadway segment locations with volume greater than capacity is included as Table 5-3. All study area freeway segments have volume in excess of capacity. There are 21 roadway segments with volume greater than capacity. Locations with LOS "E" are shown in Table 5-4. There are 10 (LOS "E") segments in Table 5-4. Table 5-5 contains roadway segments with LOS "D". Fourteen roadway segments are projected to experience LOS "D" conditions. 5-4 TABLE 5-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Cook St. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 59,470 Arterial Street 52,000 1.14 F Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr, 58,645 Arterial Street 52,000 1.13 F Cook St, Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 45,936 Arterial Street 52,000 0.88 D Cook St. Country Club Dr, Hovley Ln. E. 50,713 Arterial Street 52,000 0.98 E Cook St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Waring Dr. 38,453 Arterial Street 52,000 0.74 C Cook St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 35,597 Arterial Street 52,000 0.68 B Cook St. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 7,132 Arterial Street 52,000 0.14 A Emerald Desert Dr. Kalahari Desert Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr, 2,181 Collector Street 14,000 0.16 A Eldorado Dr, Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 3,216 Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 10,971 Arterial Street 52,000 0.21 A Via Toscana Hovley Ln. E. Pisa 2,829 Collector Street 14,000 0.20 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Warinq Dr. SR-111 9,710 Arterial Street 52,000 0.19 A Eldorado Dr. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 9,508 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.30 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. Ramon Rd. 4,146 Arterial Street 52,000 0.08 A Oasis Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 6,111 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.19 A Washington St. Av. 38 Varner Rd. 60,455 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 70,851 Arterial Street 52,000 1.36 F n Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr. 73,625 Arterial Street 52,000 1.42 F am Washington St. Country Club Dr. Hovle Ln. E. 42,863 Arterial Street 52,000 0.82 D Washington St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Waring Dr. 45,099 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 D Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 46,319 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 D Dillon Rd. Hot Springs Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 3,526 Arterial Street 52,000 0.07 A Ramon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 EB Rams 46,654 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D Ramon Rd, 1-10 EB Rams 1-10 WB Rams 28,015 Arterial Street 52,000 0.54 A Ramon Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Varner Rd. 28,015 Arterial Street 52,000 0.54 A Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 21,710 Arterial Street 52,000 0.42 A Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. Chase School Rd, 13,846 Arterial Street 52,000 0.27 A Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 46,629 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D Dinah Shore Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 35,069 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.10 F Gerald Ford Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 38,215 Arterial Street 52,000 0.73 C Gerald Ford Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av, 41,590 Arterial Street 52,000 0.80 C Gerald Ford Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 34,286 Arterial Street 52,000 0.66 B Gerald Ford Dr. Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. 14,836 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.46 A Frank Sinatra Dr, Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 25,870 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.81 D Frank Sinatra Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 27,419 Arterial Street 52,000 0.53 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 25,106 Arterial Street 52,000 0.48 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Gook St. Gerald Ford Dr. 8,527 Arterial Street 52,000 0.16 A Frank Sinatra Dr, Gerald Ford Dr, Eldorado Dr. 16,793 Arterial Street 52,000 0.321 A Av. 38 Varner Rd. Washin ton St. 22,750 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.711 C Tamarisk Row Dr. Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. 14,541 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.45 A TABLE 5-2 PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECASTJ CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Desert Crossing north of SR-111 SR-111 1,513 Collector Street 14,000 0.11 A Desert Crossing SR-111 south of SR-111 8,600 Collector Street 14,000 0.61 B Town Center W . Fred Warinq Dr. SR-111 8,088 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.25 A El Paseo SR-111 Plaza W . 8,901 Other Roadway 32,000 0.28 A El Paseo SR-111 Portola Av. 11,011 Other Roadway 52,000 0.21 A Plaza W . Shopping Center SR-111 4,517 Collector Street 14,000 0.32 A Monterey Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 46,405 Arterial Street 52,000 0.891 D Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 52,526 Arterial Street 52,000 1.011 F Monterey Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. 62,379 Arterial Street 52,000 1.201 F Monterey Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 41,872 Arterial Street 52,000 0.811 D Monterey Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 32,339 Arterial Street 52,000 0.62 B Monterey Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 32,772 Arterial Street 52,000 0.63 B Monterey Av. Country Club Dr. Parkview Dr. 38,298 Arterial Street 52,000 0.74 C Monterey Av. Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 32,561 Arterial Street 52,000 0.63 B Monterey Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 30,061 Arterial Street 52,000 0.58 A Monterey Av. SR-1 11 El Paseo 39,340 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.23 F (-n College of the Desert north of Fred Waring Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 4,424 Collector Street 14,000 0.32 A i Ln College of the Desert Fred Waring Dr. south of Fred Waring Dr. 1,031 Collector Street 14,000 0.071 A San Pablo Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 10,112 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.321 A San Pablo Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 12,711 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.40 A San Pablo Av. SR-111 El Paseo 6,023 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.19 A San Luis Rey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 6,773 Collector Street 14,000 0.48 A Portola Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 32,848 Arterial Street 52,000 0.63 B Portola Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 37,269 Arterial Street 52,000 0.72 C Portola Av, 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 46,379 Arterial Street 52,000 0.891 D Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 30,156 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.94 E Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 39,040 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.22 F Portola Av. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 30,699 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.96 E Portola Av, Hovley Ln. E. Magnesia Falls Dr, 27,709 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.87 D Portola Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Warinq Dr. 23,259 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.73 C Portola Av. Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 24,082 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.751 C Portola Av. SR-111 El Paseo 13,044 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.411 A Deep Canyon Rd. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 19,551 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.61 B Deep Canyon Rd. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 23,017 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.72 C Deep Canyon Rd. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 8,438 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A Hospitality Dr. north of SR-111 SR-111 1,867 Collector Street 14,000 0.13 A Hospitality Dr. SR-111 south of SR-11 1 5,880 Collector Street 14,000 0.42 A Chase School Rd. Ramon Rd. Varner Rd, 22,980 Arterial Street 52,000 1 0,441 A Chase School Rd, Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 40,826 Arterial Street 52,000.1 0.791 C Cook St. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 47.640 Arterial Street 52,000 1 0.92 E TABLE 5-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Fred Waring Dr. California Dr. Warner Tr. 45,205 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 D Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. Washin ton St. 53,278 Arterial Street 52,000 1.02 F Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 34,773 -Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.09 F SR-111 Bob Hoe Dr. Parkview Dr. 69,054 Arterial Street 52,000 1.33 F SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 60,419 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F SR-111 Fred Warinq Dr. Desert Crossing 40,957 Arterial Street 52,000 0.79 C SR-111 Desert Crossing El Paseo/Town Center W 41,613 Arterial Street 52,000 0.80 C SR-111 El Paseo/Town Center W . Plaza W 37,092 Arterial Street 52,000 0.8 C SR-111 Plaza W Montere Av. 39,216 Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. 47,395 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E SR-111 San Pablo Av. San Luis Rey Av. 48,979 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E SR-111 San Luis Rey Av. Portola Av. 52,238 Arterial Street 52,000 1.00 E SR-111 Portola Av. El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 49,111 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 60,469 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 60,406 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F Ln SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St. 62,223 Arterial Street 52,000 1.20 F I SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 66,080 Arterial Street 52,000 1.27 F o, SR-111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av, 72,457 Arterial Street 52,000 1.39 F Mesa View Dr. SR-74 Portola Av. 3,715 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.12 A Haystack Rd. SR-74 Portola Av. 918 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.03 A 42nd Av. Hovley Ln, E. Cook St. 3,705 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.12 A Hovley Ln, West Monterey Av. Portola Av. 2,467 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0,08 A 35th Av, Dinah Shore Dr. Unnamed Rd. 12,778 Secondag Roadway 32,000 0.40 A Lucas Way Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 3,198 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.10 A Unnamed Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 3,598 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.11 A California Dr. lFred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. 1,646 Collector Street 14,000 0.121 A Warner Tr. Av, of the States Fred Waring Dr. 8,651 Collector Street 14,000 0.62 B Bob Hoe Dr, 18th Av. 20th Av. 6,047 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.19 A Bob Hope Dr. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 8,364 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A Bob Hoe Dr. 22nd Av. 30th Av. 8,093 Collector Street 14,000 0.58 A Dillon Rd. 18th Av. Dowell Ln. 2,352 Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 A 20th Av. Bob Hope Dr. Dowell Ln. 2,707 Secondary-Roadway Secondary-Roadway 32,000 0.08 A 22nd Av. Bob Hope Dr. Dowell Ln. 603 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.021 A Dowell Ln. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 584 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.02 A Dillon Rd, 20th Av. Dowell Ln. 2,281 Arterial Street 52,000 0.04 A 20th Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 2,131 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.07 A 22nd Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 148 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.00 A Dillon Rd. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 3,133 Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 2,089 Arterial Street 52,000 0.04 A Dillon Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. n/o Dillon Rd. 1,486 Arterial Street 52,000 0.03 A TABLE 5-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ram at Montere 30,379 SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.95 E Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at_Monterey Portola Av. 17,751 Seconda Roadway32,000 0.55 A Varner Rd. Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ram at Portola 43,619 -SecondaryRoadway32,000 1.36 F Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ram at Portola Chase School Rd. 31,455 SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.98 E Varner Rd. Chase School Rd. Av. 38 36,358 SecondaryRoadway32,000 1,14 F Varner Rd. Av. 38 1-10 WB On Ram at Washington 6,269 SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.20 A Varner Rd. 1-10 WB On Ram at Washington Washington St. 14,845 Seconda Roadwa 32,000 0.46 A Varner Rd. Washington St. 1-10 WB Rams 30,493 Arterial Street 62,000 0.49 A Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Adams St. 22,107 -SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.69 B 1-10 Fw . W/O Bob Hoe Dr. Bob Hope Dr. 209,600 8-lane Freeway160,500 1.31 F 1-10 Fw . Ramon Rd. MontereyAv. 219,400 8-lane Freeway160,500 1.37 F 1-10 Fw . MontereyAv. Portola Av. 228,700 8-lane Freeway160,500 1.42 F 1-10 Fw . Portola AV. Cook St. 233,700 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.46 F 1-10 Fw . Cook St. Washington St. 226,700 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.41 F 1-10 Fw . Washington St. E/O Washington St. 202,800 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.26 F Country Club Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av. 32,328 Arterial Street 52,000 0.62 B un Country Club Dr. Monterey Av. Portola AV. 24,567 Arterial Street 52,000 0.47 A IJ Country Club Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 28,467 Arterial Street 52,000 0.55 A Country Club Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 34,072 Arterial Street 52,000 0.661 B Country Club Dr. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 25,207 Arterial Street 52,000 0.481 A Country Club Dr. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 39,784 Arterial Street 52,000 0.771 C Country Club Dr. Washington St. Av. 42 25,374 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.79 C Hovley Ln. E. Portola Av. Cook St. 14,500 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.45 A Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 22,458 -Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.70 B Hovley Ln. E. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 26,806 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.84 D Hovley Ln. E. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 19,345 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.60 A Av. 42 Washington St. Adams St. 25,611 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.801 C Magnesia Falls Dr. Monterey Av. Portola AV. 6,656 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.211 A Magnesia Falls Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 3,020 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.091 A Painters Path Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 2,800 Collector Street 14,000 0.20 A Parkview Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. 10,238 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.32 A Parkview Dr. Monterey Av. Colle e of the Desert 8,351 -Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Monterey AV. 24,223 Arterial Street 52,000 0.47 A Fred Waring Dr. Monterey Av. College ofthe Desert 39,107 Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C Fred Waring Dr. College of the Desert San Pablo Av. 39,341 Arterial Street 52,000 0.76 C Fred Waring Dr. San Pablo Av. Portola Av. 40,690 Arterial Street 52,000 0.78 C Fred Waring Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 40,429 Arterial Street 52,000 0.78 C Fred WaringDr. Dee Canyon Rd. Cook St. 48,940 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E Fred Waring Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 47,664 Arterial Street 52,000 0.92 E Fred Waring Dr. Eldorado Dr. California Dr. 46,942 1 Arterial Street 52,000 1 0.90 0 TABLE 5-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECASTJ CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C I LOS Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. Dillon Rd. 2,427 lCollector Street 14,000 0.17 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. s/o 26th Av. 4,146 1 Collector Street 14,0001 0.30 A 26th Av, Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. I e/o Thousand Palms Can on Rd. 1,286 ISecondaryRoadwa 32.0001 0.04 A U:\U cJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T5-2 i 07 .03 EXHIBIT 5-B .16 .05 � LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE 19 '04 VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO -03 .08 .07 . .06 26 02 .02 .00 .07 03 58 1.33 . .32� 6 .12 �32 .73 1.16 .17 mow W .74 .76 79 .75 1 .76 •�.r 11 .25 a.58 .0740 75 .04 .80 281 -91 1.94 1.00 .94 1.16 75 1 .19 .41 INSET A .09 .47 s 1.09 68 .30 1.73 1.18 .50 1-31 54 51 .42 .90 .72 1.04 27 .17 .17 1.37<, 95 '89 1.42 1.20 .55 44 90 1.1 1.36 .81 10.11 a .33 40 1' ccniao rorw on. 79 .73 5 .80 94 .66 .14 62 4 1.41 <1.06 1.0846 � .27 .13 -16 . .81 .53 .48 .16 .32 .45' .71 p 1.22 88 g '� 20 1.16 a.06 ' , -46 49 1.36 catnerauewa .45 69 -62 w n .55 .66 .48 .T7 1.42 1.26 .08 96 .98 _21 �.19 �m�. _ .82 74 40 86 .84 .88 a .69 87 .12 68 32 .07 .74 Asrr s � .15 .8T t u. 12`Z2 .83 1.02ww.caa 1.04 SEE INSET A •68 1.02 19 .92 .96 89 1-27 14 .30 1 "°�"'""°" LEGEND: nc o.as =VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO �uv�09� nD IC vC JR PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE FFIC STUDY,Palm Desert,Califomia-00055:LES5 vc3 5-10 TABLE 5-4 PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE"E" FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 30,156 Ma or Thorou hfare 32,000 0.94 E Portola Av. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 30,699 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.96 E Cook St. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 47,640 Arterial Street 52,000 0.92 E Cook St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 50,713 Arterial Street 52,000 0.98 E Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey 30,379 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.95 E Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp. at Portola Chase School Rd. 31,455 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.981 E Fred Waring Dr, Deep Canyon Rd. Cook St. 48,940 Arterial Street 52,000 0.941 E Fred Waring Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 47,664 Arterial Street 52,000 0.921 E SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. 47,395 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E SR-111 San Pablo Av. San Luis Rey Av, 48,979 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E SR-111 San Luis Rey Av. Portola Av. 52.238 jArterial Street 52,000 1.00 E SR-111 Portola Av. jEI Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 49,111 jArterial Street 52,000 0.94 E U.\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T5-4 N TABLE 5-3 PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY(LOS"F") FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECASTJ CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C I LOS Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Ramps 52,526 Arterial Street 52,000 1.011 F Monterey Av. 1-10 EB Ramps Dinah Shore Dr, 62,379 Arterial Street 52,000 1.201 F Monterey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 39,340 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.23 F Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 39,040 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.22 F Cook St, 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr, 59,470 Arterial Street 52,000 1.14 F Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr, 58,645 Arterial Street 52,000 1.13 F Washington St. Av. 38 Varner Rd. 60,455 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 70,851 Arterial Street 52,000 1.361 F Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr. 73,625 Arterial Street 52,000 1.421 F Dinah Shore Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 35,069 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.10 F Varner Rd, Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola 43,619 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.36 F Varner Rd. Chase School Rd. Av. 38 36,358 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.14 F Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. Washin ton St. 53,278 Arterial Street 52,000 1.02 F v, Fred Waring Dr. Washin ton St. Jefferson St. 34,773 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.09 F SR-111 Bob Hope Dr. Parkview Dr. 69,054 Arterial Street 52,000 1.331 F SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Warin Or. 60,419 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 60,469 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 60,406 Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St. 62,223 Arterial Street 52,000 1.20 F SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 66,080 Arterial Street 52,000 1.27 F SR-111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av 72,457 Arterial Street 52,000 1.39 F U:IU cJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls)T5-3 TABLE 5-5 PALM DESERT LESS INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE I'D" FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS .Monterey Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 46,405 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 D Monterey Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 41,872 Arterial Street 52,000 0.81 D Portola Av. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 46,379 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 D Portola Av. Hovley Ln. E. Magnesia Falls Dr. 27,709 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.87 D Cook St, Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr, 45,936 Arterial Street 52,000 0.88 D Washington St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 42,863 Arterial Street 52,000 0.821 D Washington St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Waring Dr. 45,099 Arterial Street 52,000 0.871 D Washington St. Fred Warinq Dr. SR-111 46,319 Arterial Street 52,000 0.891 D Ramon Rd, Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 EB Rams 46,654 Arterial Street 52,000 0,901 D Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 46,629 Arterial Street 52,000 0.901 D Frank Sinatra Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 25,870 1 Maior Thoroughfare 32,000 0.811 D Hovley Ln. E. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 26,806 1 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.84 D vn Fred Waring Dr. Eldorado Dr. California Dr. 46,942 lArterial Street 52,000 0.90 D i Fred Waring Dr. California Dr. Warner Tr. 45,205 JArterial Street 52,000 0.87 D w U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\(00055-04.xlsJT5-5 x t THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 5-14 i r: kk, i 0 MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE The More Intense scenario has ten percent (10%) more trip generation than the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario. More Intense alternative trip generation is included as Table 6-1. Trip generation increases most substantially in the north district. The mid district includes more housing (a low trip generator) than any other alternative, which causes a decrease in trip generation for the mid district. The More scenario has the best balance of citywide productions and attractions (but still imports almost 70,000 attractions per day). I 6.1 More Intense Alternative Daily Traffic Volumes Daily traffic volumes throughout the study area for the More Intense scenario are shown on Exhibit 6-A. As described previously, growth adjustment volumes were developed for the Currently Adopted General Plan scenario that ensured that no negative growth occurred within the study area. The same adjustments have then been applied to this scenario. A small number of locations (4 total) experience slight volume decreases, with the largest decrease compared to existing 2002 conditions occurring on Magnesia Falls Drive between Portola Avenue and Deep Canyon Road (approximately -400 vehicles per day). Supporting calculations are included in Appendix "K". Roadways carry volumes greater than 50,000 vpd as follows: • Washington Street from Avenue 38 to Country Club Drive • SR-111 east of San Luis Rey Avenue • SR-111 northwest of Fred Waring Drive • Bob Hope Drive north of the 1-10 Freeway • Monterey Avenue south of the 1-10 Freeway • Cook Street from the 1-10 Freeway to Frank Sinatra Drive • Fred Waring Drive from Cook Street to Eldorado Drive 6-1 TABLE 6-1 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RE INTENSE SCENARIO TRIP-END SUMMARY NORTH DIST,T DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps/As) Home Based Work 17,179 23,168 -5,989 0.74 Home based Social/Recreation 18,250 17,347 903 1.05 Home Based Shopping/Personaisiness 41,078 51,067 -9,989 0.80 ' Home Based School 5,260 0 5,260 N/A Non-Home Based 84,939 84,927 12 1.00 Total 166,706 176,509 -9,803 0.94 Total Trip-Ends 343,215 FWmo ID DISTRIC DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps!As) d Work 3,980 6,585 2,605 0.60 d Social/Recreation 4,297 8,914 -4,617 0.48 d Shopping/Personal BGness 9,687 29,678 -19,991 0.33 d School 1,233 9,863 -8,630 0.13 Based 39,235 39,267 -32 1.00 58,432 94,307 -35,875 0.62 ds 152,739 SOUTH DISTRICT DIFFERENCE RATIO PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATTRACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps/As) Home Based Work 29,515 20,953 Home based Social/Recreation 8,562 1.41 Home Based Sho g 67,119 92,343 -4,866 0.73 ppin /Personal Business 67,477 92,343 -24,866 0.73 Home Based School 8,801 10,509 -1,708 0.84 Non-Home Based 135,862 135,860 2 1.00 Total 271,774 294,652 -22,878 0.92 Total Trip-Ends 566,426 CITYWIDE TOTAL PURPOSE PRODUCTIONS ATT DIFFERENCE RATIO RACTIONS (Ps-As) (Ps/As Home Based Work ) Home based Social/Recreation 50,674 50,706 -32 1.00 Home Based Shopping/Personal Business 52,666 61,248 -8,582 0.86 Home Based School 118,242 173,088 -54,846 0.68 Non-Home Based 15,294 20,372 -5,078 0.75 Total 260,036 260,054 -18 1.00 496,912 565,468 -68,556 0.88 Total Trip-Ends 1,062,380 U:1UcJobs1000551Excelt[00055-04.xls]T6-1 6-2 .6 2 1.� 4 MORE I EXHIBIT 6-A INTENSE ALTERNATIVE 2.4 28 2, AVERAGE. DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) .V 30 3.3 8.4 y 7 .8 .2 a 3.7 8.3 3 . 1.5 9.1 ,a 9 3.9 3 102 .9 6 0 9 RrD w R3v+c8DR 2-7 .4 38.4 39.0 AN 0 62 9.8 12.9 4.3 1.4 ',, 4 'u17.6 47.9 49.6 53. 50.061. 9.1 .4 12 4.4 El v�o 15.3 INSET A i 4 35.6 22.4 56.3 62. 27.2 18.5 4.4 no. 30. 25.2 202 ,-RD 10.8 1 219.7 4.2 35.4 10.8 31.0 482 64.6 18.0 zzs.s 34.7 47.3 3 34.5 446 42.5 2 .7 zssa 10.9 13.4 2.4 1 47.9 48-8 39.5 43.0 30.7 34.3 37-9 zzv.s 33.6 `s 0 6.0 58.7 16.3 g 33.9 16.1 fRA1/t iN,TRA DR. 60.7 W]� 25.6 28.4 26.8 7.5 17.1 14.7 r 25.2 34.8 9 3 7 5 3.4 } 6.4 64.4 15.0 1.4 14 7 73.9 cw.rnv a_e Da 22.9 33.4 _25-4 29.1 35.3 26.7 40.7 6.0 n&s .ter. 2.4 31.0 51.5 11.3 6,S 44.6 wwev u,�.sr 9.6 14, 1 27.3 3 28.2 18.9; 22.7 28.2 3.6 .9 10.0 2.1 37.6 sT.6 45.5 16.9 19.5 4 y 92 Dw.n.a DR 32.6 SEE INSET A 23.1 9 35.9 53.9 7 48.2 48-7 47.1 1. 5.9 72 9.6 73.3 8.5 \ �r�,rumx LEGEND: to.D -VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) �. 1.7 3-0 PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY,Palm Desert,California-00055:More3 6-3 6.2 More Alternative Daily Level of Service Volume/capacity ratios for the More Intense scenario are shown on Exhibit 6-13. Table 6-2 shows more detailed calculations. Roadway segments with volume greater than capacity are summarized in Table 6-3. Table 6-3 lists 24 roadway segments with volume in excess of capacity. All study area freeway segments also have volume greater than capacity. Tables 6-4 and 6-5 show similar summaries for LOS "E" and LOS "D" segments, respectively. There are 15 t roadway segments listed in Table 6-4 (LOS "E") and 12 roadway segments listed in Table 6-5. 6-4 i; ui 07 03 05 EXHIBIT 6-B 16 05 MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE 19 � .OS °� VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO 03 '09 .07 .06 .26 02 AV,}1 02 .01 q� 07 i .59 � ��rJ� -� �1.33 .46 CAnfV1EV%I 67 .12 °32 .75 19 FnEDv Dti .74 '75 80 1 .74 75 AV `.26 57 .07 40 -76 .04 '+� -81 72 .92 .95 1.02 .96 " 28 .76 1 -20 4 3�ASEO 09 INSET A _ - 1.11 .70 .32 1.76 1.20 .58 1.31 52 f# .48 -AD. .93 76 1.10 39 .21 21 1.37 % .97 93 t 1.24 1.43 -91 1.1 56 66 .67 1.39 .82 10 34 2 1. 7 GFRAtD-D0. '94 .76 i .83 1.43 W 65 i 21 .18 0 1.13 31 o 1.06 50a F-srurnA Dn. .17 .16 Av.M .80 .55 .52 .14 .33 46 -79 .67 1.23 91 06 .20 124 .50 A,, .47 1.42 .46 ca»rtm aDe Dw 72 .64 .49 -56 .68 1 tN west '� 1.46 -28 07 .97 .22 21 86 76 V. .85 .88 .59; .71 88 .11 21 -72 33 WClA'SY CALLS D -07 .72 1 AS 9 TATEs 22 .61 .10 "� 88 .83 .99 -c w.r - 1.02 SEE INSET A 73-13 .69 104 .19 93 .94 .91 129 -26 18<42 14 .30 „' 1-41 '�a�rtumon. LEGEND: 0.88 =VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO .05 09 A PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY, Palm Desert, Califomia-00055:more vc3 6-5 TABLE 6-2 PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Desert Crossin north of SR-111 SR-111 1,512 Collector Street 14,000 0.11 A Desert Crossin SR-111 south of SR-111 8,600 Collector Street 14,000 0.61 B Town Center W . Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 8,242 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A El Paseo SR-111 Plaza W . 9,07,9 Other Roadway 32,000 0.28 A El Paseo SR-111 Portola Av. 11,467 Other Roadway 52,000 0.22 A Plaza W . Shopping Center SR-111 4,529 Collector Street 14,000 0.321 A Monterey Av. Ivarner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 48,163 Arterial Street 52,000 0.93 E Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 54,196 Arterial Street 52,000 1.04 F Monterey Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr, 64,576 Arterial Street 52,000 1.24 F Monterey Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 42,538 Arterial Street 52,000 0.82 D Monterey Av, JGerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr, 33,578 Arterial Street 52,000 0.65 B Monterey Av, lFrank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 34,779 Arterial Street 52,000 0.67 B Monterey Av. lCountry Club Dr. Parkview Dr. 39,589 Arterial Street 52,000 0.76 C Monterey Av. Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr, 32,671 Arterial Street 52,000 0.63 B Monterey Av. Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 29,774 Arterial Street 52,000 0.57 A Montere Av, SR-111 El Paseo 39,112 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.22 F rn College of the Desert north of Fred Waring Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 4,430 Collector Street 14,000 0.32 A rn College of the Desert Fred Waring Dr. south of Fred Waring Dr. 1,033 Collector Street 14,000 1 0.07 A San Pablo Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 10,218 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.32 A San Pablo Av, Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 12,903 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.40 A San Pablo Av, SR-111 El Paseo 6,387 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.20 A San Luis Rey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 6,665 Collector Street 14,000 0.48 A Portola Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 34,462 Arterial Street 52,000 0.66 B Portola Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 38,942 Arterial Street 52,000 0.751 C Portola Av, 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 47,889 Arterial Street 52,000 0.92 E Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 30,731 -Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.96 E Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 39,301 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.23 F Portola Av. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 30,971 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.97 E Portola Av. Hovley Ln. E. Magnesia Falls Dr. 28,247 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1 0.88 D Portola Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 23,873 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.75 C Portola Av, Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 24,274 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.76 C Portola Av. SR-111 El Paseo 12,887 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.40 A Deep Canyon Rd. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr, 19,539 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.61 B Deep Canyon Rd. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 23,291 Secondary R adway 32,000 0.73 C Deep Canyon Rd. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 8,461 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A Hospitality Dr, north of SR-111 SR-111 1,873 Collector Street 14,000 0,13 A Hos italit Dr. SR-111 south of SR-111 5,905 Collector Street 14,000 0.42 A Chase School Rd. Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. 34,683 Arterial Street 52,000 0.67 B Chase School Rd. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 48,773 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E Cook St. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 53,216 Arterial Street 52,000 1.02 F TABLE 6.2 (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey 30,974 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.97 E Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey Portola Av. 17,961 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.56 A Varner Rd. Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola 44,608 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.39 F Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola Chase School Rd. 32,435 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.01 F Varner Rd, Chase School Rd. Av, 38 37,852 Secondary Roadway32,000 1.18 F Varner Rd. Av. 38 I-10 WB On Ram at Washington 6,400 SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.201 A Varner Rd, 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washington Washington St. 14,970 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.47 A IVarner Rd. Washington St. 1-10 WB Rams 31,431 Arterial Street 62,000 0.51 A Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Adams St. 22,919 -SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.72 C 1-10 Fw . W/O Bob Hope Dr. Bob Hope Dr. 210,800 8-lane Freeway160,500 1.31 F I-10 Fw Ramon Rd. Montere Av. 219,700 8-lane Freeway160,500 1.37 F 1-10 Fw . MontereyAv. Portola Av. 229,600 8-lane Free 160,500 1.43 F ' way Fw . Portola Av. Cook St. 235,300 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.47 F I-10 Fw . Cook St. Washington St. 229,500 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.43 F 1-10 Fw . Washington St. E/O Washington St. 205,800 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.28 F °1 Country Club Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 33,449 Arterial Street 52,000 0.64 B cc Country Club Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 25,411 Arterial Street 52,000 0.49 A Country Club Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 29,111 Arterial Street 52,000 0.56 A Country Club Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 35,329 Arterial Street 52,000 0.68 B Country Club Dr. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 26,659 Arterial Street 52,000 0.51 A Country Club Dr, Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 40,697 Arterial Street 52,000 0.78 C Country Club Dr. Washington St. Av. 42 26,738 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.84 D Hovley Ln. E. Portola Av. Cook St. 14,400 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.45 A Hovlev Ln. E. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 22,905 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.72 C Hovley Ln. E. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 27,286 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.85 D Hovley Ln. E. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 18,863 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.59 A Av. 42 Washington St. Adams St. 26,365 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.82 D Magnesia Falls Dr. -Monterey Av. Portola Av. 6,896 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.22 A Magnesia Falls Dr, Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 3,044 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.10 A Painters Path Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 2,800 Collector Street 14,000 0.20 A Parkview Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. 9,849 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.31 A Parkview Dr, Monterey Av. College of the Desert 8,440 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. 24,265 Arterial Street 52,000 0.47 A Fred Waring Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert 38,627 Arterial Street 52,000 0.74 C Fred Waring Dr. College of the Desert San Pablo Av. 38,884 Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C Fred Waring Dr. San Pablo Av. Portola Av. 40,384 Arterial Street 52,000 0.78 C Fred Waring Dr. Portola Av. Dee Canyon Rd. 38,398 Arterial Street 52,000 0.74 C Fred Waring Dr. Deep Canyon Rd. Cook St. 48,880 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E Fred Waring Dr, Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 46,187 Arterial Street 52,000 1 0.89 D Fred WarinQ Dr, Eldorado Dr. California Dr. 45,888 Arterial Street 52,000 0.88 D TABLE 6.2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUMEXAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Cook St, 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 62,935 Arterial Street 52,000 1.21 F Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. IFrank Sinatra Dr. 60,737 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. lCountry Club Dr. 47,463 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Cook St. Country Club Dr. I Hovley Ln. E. 51,490 Arterial Street 52,000 0.99 E Cook St. Hovley Ln, E. lFred Waring Dr. 37,630 Arterial Street 52,000 0.72 C Cook St. IFred Waring Dr. SR-111 35,919 Arterial Street 52,000 0.691 B Cook St. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 7,162 Arterial Street 52,000 0.14 A Emerald Desert Dr. Kalahari Desert Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 2,211 Collector Street 14,000 0.16 A Eldorado Dr, Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 3,367 Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 11,250 Arterial Street 52,000 0.22 A Via Toscana Hovley Ln. E. Pisa 2,903 Collector Street 14,000 0.21 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 9,661 Arterial Street 52,000 0.19 A Eldorado Dr. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 9,610 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.30 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. Ramon Rd. 4,446 Arterial Street 52,000 0.09 A Oasis Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 6,834 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.21 A Washington St. Av. 38 Varner Rd. 64,386 Arterial Street 52,000 1.24 F o� Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Ramps 73,936 Arterial Street 52,000 1.42 F Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr, 75,991 Arterial Street 52,000 1.46 F Washington St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 44,565 Arterial Street 52,000 0.86 D Washington St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Waring Dr. 45,502 Arterial Street 52,000 0.88 D Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 47,132 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Dillon Rd. Hot Spring;Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 3,715 Arterial Street 52,000 0.071 A Ramon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 EB Ramps 48,133 Arterial Street 52,000 0.93 E Ramon Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 1-10 WB Rams 30,010 Arterial Street 52,000 0.58 A Ramon Rd. 1-10 WB Ramps Varner Rd. 30,010 Arterial Street 52,000 0.58 A Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 25,207 Arterial Street 52,000 0.48 A Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. Chase School Rd. 20,245 Arterial Street 52,000 0.39 A Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 47,326 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Dinah Shore Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 35,599 Seconds Roadwa 32,000 1.11 F Gerald Ford Dr, Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 39,539 Arterial Street 52,000 0.76 C Gerald Ford Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 42,983 Arterial Street 52,000 0.83 D Gerald Ford Dr, Portola Av. Cook St. 34,280 Arterial Street 52,000 0.66 B Gerald Ford Dr. Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. 16,138 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.50 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 25,638 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.80 C Frank Sinatra Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 28,370 Arterial Street 52,000 0.55 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 26,785 Arterial Street 52,000 0.52 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. 7,465 Arterial Street 52,000 0.14 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Eldorado Dr. 17,088 Arterial Street 52,000 0.33 A Av. 38 Varner Rd. Washington St. 25,175 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.791 C Tamarisk Row Dr. Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. 14,741 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.46 A TABLE 6-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Fred Waring Dr. California Dr. Warner Tr. 44,448 Arterial Street 52,000 0.85 D Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr, Washington St. 53,881 Arterial Street 52,000 1.04 F Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 34,358 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.07 F SR-111 Bob Ho e Dr. Parkview Dr. 69,078 Arterial Street 52,000 1.33 F SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Warinq Dr. 60,861 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F SR-111 Fred Warinq Dr. Desert Crossing 41,609 Arterial Street 52,000 0.80 C SR-111 Desert Crossing El Paseo/Town Center W . 42,264 Arterial Street 52,000 0.81 D SR-111 El Paseo/Town Center W . Plaza W . 37,641 Arterial Street 52,000 0.72 C SR-111 Plaza W . Monterey Av. 39,654 Arterial Street 52,000 0.76 C SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. 47,948 Arterial Street 52,000 0.92 E SR-111 San Pablo Av, San Luis Rey Av. 49,561 Arterial Street 52,000 0.95 E SR-111 San Luis Rey Av. Portola Av. 52,971 Arterial Street 52,000 1.02 F SR-111 Portola Av. El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 50,009 Arterial Street 52,000 0.96 E SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 61,698 Arterial Street 52,000 1.19 F SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 61,516 Arterial Street 52,000 1.18 F SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St. 63,386 Arterial Street 52,000 1.22 F SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 66,823 Arterial Street 52,000 1.29 F SR-111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. 73,274 Arterial Street 52,000 1.41 F Mesa View Dr. SR-74 Portola Av. 3,766 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.12 A Haystack Rd. SR-74 Portola Av. 958 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.03 A 42nd Av. Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. 3,601 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.11 A Hovley Ln. West Monterey Av. Portola Av. 2,365 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1 0.07 A 35th Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Unnamed Rd. 13,379 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.42 A Lucas Way Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 3,229 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.10 A Unnamed Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 3,665 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.11 A California Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. 1,385 Collector Street 14,000 0.10 A Warner Tr. Av.of the States Fred Waring Dr. 9,242 1 Collector Street 14,000 0.66 B Bob Hoe Dr. 18th Av. 20th Av. 6,029 Se6ondary Roadway 32,0001 0.19 A Bob Hope Dr. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 8,373 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A Bob Hope Dr. 22nd Av. 30th Av. 8,258 Collector Street 14,000 0.59 A Dillon Rd. 18th Av. Dowell Ln. 2,427 Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 A 20th Av, Bob Hope Dr. Dowell Ln, 2,772 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.09 A 22nd Av. Bob Hope Dr. Dowell Ln. 763 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.02 A Dowell Ln. 20th Av. 22nd Av, 661 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.02 A Dillon Rd. 20th Av. Dowell Ln. 2,375 Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 A 20th Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 2,109 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.07 A 22nd Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 182 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.01 A Dillon Rd, 20th Av. 22nd Av. 3,251 Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 2,594 lArlerial Street 52,000 0.05 A Dillon Rd, IThousand Palms Canyon Rd. n/o Dillon Rd. 1,511. Arterial Street 52,000 0.03 A TABLE 6-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. Dillon Rd. 2,635 Collector Street 14,000 0.191 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. s/o 26th Av. 4,446 lCollector Street 14,000 0.321 A 26th Av. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. e/o Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 1,359ISeconclary Roadwa 32,000 0041 A U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T6-2 rn i 0 TABLE 6-3 PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH VOLUME EXCEEDING CAPACITY(LOS "F") -T FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Monterey Av, I-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 54,196 Arterial Street 52000 1.04 F Montere , Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. 64,576 Arterial Street 52,000 1.24 F Monterey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 39,112 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.22 F Portola Av, Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr, 39,301 Ma'or Thoroughfare 32,000 1.23 F Cook St. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 53,216 Arterial Street 52,000 1.02 F Cook St. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr, 62,935 jArterial Street 52,000 1.21 F Cook.St. emerald Ford D;. Frank Sinatra Dr. 60,737 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F Washington St. Av, 38 Varner Rd. 64,386 Arterial Street g52,OOO 1.24 F Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 73,936 Arterial Street 1.42 F Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Count Club Dr, 75,991 Arterial Street 1.46 F Dinah Shore Dr. Montere Av, Portola Av. 35,599 Seconda Roadwa 1.11 F Varner Rd. Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola 44,608 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.39 F Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ram at Portola Chase School Rd. 32,435 Seconda Roadwa 32,000 1.01 F Varner Rd. Chase School Rd. Av. 38 37,852 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.18 F Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. Washington St. 53,881 Arterial Street 52,000 1.04 F Fred Waring Dr. Washin ton St. Jefferson St. 34,358 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.07 F SR-111 Bob Ho e Dr. Parkview Dr, 69,078 Arterial Street 52,000 1,33 F SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 60,861 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F SR-111 San Luis Rey Av. Portola Av. 52,971 lArterial Street 52,000 1.02 F SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 61,698 jArterial Street 52,000 1.19 F SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 61,516 Arterial Street 52,000 1.18 F SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St. 63,386 Arterial Street 52,000 1.22 F SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 66,823 Arterial Street 52,000 1.29 F SR-111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. 73,274 Arterial Street 1 52,000 1.41 F U:1UcJobs1000551Excell(00055-04.xls]T6-3 moo TABLE 6-4 PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE"E., FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C I LOS Monterey Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 48,163 Arterial Street 52,000 0.93 E Portola Av. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. 47,889 Arterial Street 52,000 0.92 E Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 30,731 Ma'or Thoroughfare 32,000 0.96 E Portola Av. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 30,971 Maior Thoroughfare 32,000 0.97 E Chase School Rd. Varner Rd, 1-10 WB Rams 48,773 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. -Tountry Club Dr. 47,463 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Cook St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 51,490 Arterial Street 52,000 0.99 E Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 47,132 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Ramon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 EB Rams 48,133 Arterial Street 52,000 0.93 E Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 47,326 Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey 30,974 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.97 E Fred Waring Dr. D ep Canyon Rd. Cook St. 48,880 Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. 47,948 Arterial Street 52,000 0.92 E Q1 SR-111 San Pablo Av. San Luis Rey Av. 49,561 Arterial Street 52,000 0.951 E i SR-111 Portola Av. El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 50,009 jArterial Street 1 52,000 1 0,96 E N U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T6-4 TABLE 6-5 PALM DESERT MORE INTENSE ALTERNATIVE ROADWAY SEGMENTS WITH LEVEL OF SERVICE"D., FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Monterey Av, Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 42,538 Arterial Street 52,000 0.82 D Portola Av, Hovley Ln. E. Magnesia Falls Dr. 28,247 Ma'or Thoroughfare 32,000 0.88 D Washington St. Count Club Dr. Hovle Ln. E. 44,565 Arterial Street 52,000 0.86 D Washington St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Warin Dr. 45,502 Arterial Street 52,000 0.88 D Gerald Ford Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 42,983 Arterial Street 52,000 0.83 D Country Club Dr. Washington St. Av.42 26,738 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.84 D .Hovley Ln. E. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 27,286 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.85 D Av. 42 Washington St. Adams St. 26,365 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.82 D Fred Waring Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 46,187 Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 D Fred Waring Dr. Eldorado Dr. California Dr. 45,888 Arterial Street 52,000 0.88 D Fred Waring Dr. lCalifornia Dr. Warner Tr. 44,448 Arterial Street 52,000 1 0.851 D SR-111 Desert Crossin9 El Paseo/Town Center W . 42,264 Arterial Street 52,000 0.81 D rn i w U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xls]T6-5 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 6-14 7.0 SPECIAL ISSUES In the course of the Palm Desert General Plan update traffic study preparation, several special issues have been identified that required further evaluation. Analysis has been performed without the proposed 1-10 Freeway interchange at Portola Avenue. Removal of the planned eastbound free right turn lane from Gerald Ford Drive onto Cook Street has also been reviewed. 7.1 Portola Interchange Evaluation The Preferred scenario has been analyzed without the proposed 1-10 Freeway interchange at Portola Avenue. Daily model volume forecasts have been refined using the same methodology as in other scenarios. Daily volume refinements are included as Appendix "N". Exhibit 7-A contains the resulting refined daily forecast volumes. A comparison of forecast volumes with and without the proposed interchange is included as Appendix "O". As shown in Appendix "O", parallel roadways in the vicinity of the 1-10 Freeway carry much more traffic without the interchange than with the interchange. Monterey Avenue south of the 1-10 Freeway will carry in excess of 83,000 vehicles per day, while Cook Street south of the 1-10 Freeway will carry in excess of 76,000 vehicles per day. Volume/capacity (V/C) analysis has been performed and is included in Table 7-1. Exhibit 7-B graphically shows the results of this analysis. Table 7-2 compares the V/C ratios with and without the 1-10 Freeway interchange at Portola Avenue. Monterey Avenue and Cook Street both experience higher V/C ratios and worse service levels without the interchange at Portola Avenue. Detailed peak hour analysis of this issue was performed for the Desert Gateway Traffic Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads, Inc., October 18, 2002). Conclusions from the Desert Gateway illustrate the need for a new interchange of the 1-10 Freeway at Portola Avenue. Specific results will vary, as the model has recently 7-1 k EXHIBIT 7-A NO PORTOLA AVENUE INTERCHANGE 12 3 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) ,a SZ r) v 0.9 v z, 32 s � o.t os q� b as aB 1s •s y o0 3 o .. r n7 zr �♦ $ { atf ]63 13£ D FyJ 6 t] K 9t laa x.t 4 tf� 3{.3 523 Us .1 MS J 1 12.9 INSET A 2f 31 y 6 8 a a, o .a ,6f aza 299 a a0 1 �u4+ra 3.9 9s o 9f A'O r� Sa sos aoa Mf a Q )9 k 2$ EAYD lard D0. -1 a3. a2o n .zx S a n a, u ns Mo 1w. a. tf ltf •247 as ,as W> zaa na no o.• .s a.aa as ofa 209 as a os Sf w M f s .za �• a21 45 � .lf .a. SEE INSET A zc ar •o ua n, 66f 763 )9 3r b LEGEND: 9f 100 =VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) a...ow PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:NoPortADT URBAN ,.AN 7-2 TABLE 7-.1 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE AT 1.10 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Desert Crossing north of SR-111 SR-111 1,527 Collector Street 14,000 0,11 A Desert Crossing SR-111 south of SR-111 8,600 Collector Street 14,000 0.61 B Town Center W . Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 8,150 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.25 A El Paseo SR-111 Plaza W . 8,303 Other Roadway 32,000 0.26 A El Paseo SR-111 Portola Av. 10,675 Other Roadway 32,000 0.33 A Plaza W . Shopping Center SR-111 4,508 Collector Street 14,000 0.32 A Monterey Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams 55,761 Arterial Street 52,000 1.071 F Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams 63,671 Arterial Street 52,000 1.22 F Monterey Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. 83,116 Arterial Street 52,000 1.60 F Monterey Av, Dinah Shore Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. 44,879 Arterial Street 52,000 0.86 D Monterey Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 28,418 Arterial Street 52,000 0.55 A Monterey Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 31,233 Arterial Street 52,000 0.60 A Monterey Av. Country Club Dr. Parkview Dr. 38,476 Arterial Street 52,000 0.74 C Monterey Av, Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 32,852 Arterial Street 52,000 0.63 B Monterey Av, Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 28,781 Arterial Street 52,000 0.55 A Monterey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 40,324 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.26 F College of the Desert north of Fred Waring Dr. Fred Waring Dr, 4,415 Collector Street 14,000 0.32 A Colle e of the Desert Fred WaringDr, south of Fred WaringDr, 1,046 Collector Street 14,000 0.07 A San Pablo Av. Ma nesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 10,047 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.31 A San Pablo Av, Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 13,291 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0,42 A San Pablo Av. SR-111 El Paseo 6,734 Scenic Secondary RoadwaX 32,000 0.21 A San Luis Rey Av. SR-111 El Paseo 6,288. Collector Street 14,000 0.45 A Portola Av, Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramps - Does not Exist 0.00 A Portola Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams Does not Exist 0.00 A Portola Av. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. Does not Exist - 0.00 A Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 29,566 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.921 E Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr, Country Club Dr, 36,918 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.15 F Portola Av. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 30,583 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.96 E Portola Av. Hovley Ln. E. Ma nesia Falls Dr. 27,458 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.86 D Portola Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr, 22,959 Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.72 C Portola Av. Fred Warinq Dr, SR-111 24,622 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.77 C Portola Av. SR-111 El Paseo 12,932 Major Thoroughfare 32 000 0.40 A Deep Canyon Rd. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. 20,002 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.63 B Deep Canyon Rd. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 22,344 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.70 B Deep Canyon Rd. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 7.893 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.25 A Hospitality Dr. north of SR-111 SR-111 1,951 Collector Street 14,000 0.14 A Hospitality Dr. SR-111 south of SP,1.11 5,932 Collector Street 14,000. 0.42 A Chase School Rd. Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. 30,335 Arterial Street 52,000 0.581 A Chase School Rd. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramps 58,088 1 Arterial Street 52,000 1.121 F Cook St. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rarn s 67,169 Arterial Street 52,000 1.29 F Cook St. I-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford iDr. 76,335 Arterial Street 52,000 1.47 F Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 62,254 Arterial Street 52,000 1.201 F Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. Count Club Dr. 48,048 Arterial Street 52,000 0.92 E TABLE 7-1 (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE AT 1-10 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Cook St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 52,500 Arterial Street 52,000 1.01 F Cook St. Hovley Ln. E. Fred Warino Dr. 39,382 Arterial Street 52,000 0.76 C Cook St. Fred Warinq Dr, SR-111 39,647 Arterial Street 52,000 0.76 C Cook St, SR-111 Fairway Dr. 7,436 Arterial Street 52,000 0.14 A Emerald Desert Dr. Kalahari Desert Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. 2,191 Collector Street 14,000 0.16 A Eldorado Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. 3,370 Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 10,773 Arterial Street 52,000 0.21 A Via Toscana Hovley Ln. E. Pisa 2,876 Collector Street 14,000 0.21 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 8,962 Arterial Street 52,000 0.17 A Eldorado Dr. SR-111 Fairway Dr. 9,642 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.30 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. Ramon Rd. 4,322 Arterial Street 52,000 0.08 A Oasis Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 6,859 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.21 A Washington St. Av. 38 Varner Rd. 62,319 Arterial Street 52,000 1.201 F Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 73,524 Arterial Street 52,000 1.41 F Washington St. 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr. 76,116 Arterial Street 52,000 1.46 F Washington St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 43,796 Arterial Street 52,000 0.84 D --J Washington St. Hovle Ln. E. Fred Warin Dr. 45,583 Arterial Street 52,000 0.88 D 1It, Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 44,282 Arterial Street 52,000 0.85 D Dillon Rd. Hot Springs Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 3,612 Arterial Street 52,000 0.07 A Ramon Rd. Bob Hope Dr. 1-10 EB Rams 48.544 Arterial Street 52,000 0.93 E Ramon Rd. 1-10 EB Rams 1-10 WB Rams 30,384 Arterial Street 52,000 0.58 A Ramon Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Varner Rd, 30,384 Arterial Street 52,000 0.58 A Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 24,131 Arterial Street 52,000 0.46 A Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. Chase School Rd. 15,855 Arterial Street 52,000 0.30 A Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av. 50,530 Arterial Street 52,000 0.97 E Dinah Shore Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 49,588 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.55 F Gerald Ford Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av. 35,441 Arterial Street 52,000 0.68 B Gerald Ford Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 32,009 Arterial Street 52,000 0.62 B Gerald Ford Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 42,193 Arterial Street 52,000 0.81 D Gerald Ford Dr. Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. 16,669 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.52 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 25,540 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.80 C Frank Sinatra Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 28,634 Arterial Street 52,000 0.55 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 33,412 Arterial Street 52,000 0.64 B Frank Sinatra Dr. Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. 8,993 Arterial Street 52,000 0.17 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Eldorado Dr. 18,918 Arterial Street 52,000 0.361 A Av. 38 Varner Rd. Washington St. 24,738 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.77 C Tamarisk Row Dr. Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. 16,463 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.51 A Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey 41,396 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.29 F Varner Rd. 1-10 WB RamQ at Monterey Portola Av. 22,586 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.71 C Varner Rd. Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola 22,813 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.71 C Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola Chase School Rd. 22,813 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.71 C Varner Rd. Chase School Rd. Av. 38 36,379 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.14 F Varner Rd. Av.38 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washington 6.326 1 Secondary Road- 32,000 0.20 A TABLE 7.1 (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE AT 1-10 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE VOLUMEICAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECASTJ CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS Varner Rd. 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washington lWashington St. 13,523 1 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.42 A Varner Rd, Washington St. 1-10 WB Rams 31,790 1 Arterial Street 62,000 0,51 A Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Adams St. 22,499 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.70 B 1-10 Fw . W/O Bob Hoe Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. 209,500 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.31 F 1-10 Fwy. Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. 218,600 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.36 F 1-10 Fw . Monterey Av. Cook St. 227,200 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.42 F 1-10 Fw . Cook St. Washington St. 224,100 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.40 F 1.10 Fwy. Washington St. E/O Washington St. 201,100 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.25 F Country Club Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. 33,659 Arterial Street 52,000 0.65 B Country Club Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 23,647 Arterial Street 52,000 0.45 A Country Club Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. 29,154 Arterial Street 52,000 0.56 A Country Club Dr. Cook St, Eldorado Qr. 33,897 Arterial Street 52,000 0.65 B Country Club Dr. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 25,556 Arterial Street 52,000 0.491 A Country Club Dr, Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 41,730 Arterial Street 52,000 0.801 C Country Club Dr. Washington St. Av.42 25,608 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.801 C Hovley Ln. E. Portola Av. Cook St. 14,200 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.44 A Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 24,078 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.75 C I Hovley Ln. E. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. 27,867 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.87 D n Hovley Ln. E. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. 20,942 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.65 B Av.42 Washington St. Adams St, 27.528 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.86 D Magnesia Falls Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. 5,869 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.18 A Magnesia Falls Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. 3,444 1 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.11 A Painters Path Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 2,800 Collector Street 14,000 0.20 A Parkview Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. 10,977 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.34 A Parkview Dr, Monterey Av. College of the Desert 8,485 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.27 A Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. 22,732 Arterial Street 52,000 0.44 A Fred Waring Dr. Monterey Av. Colle e of the Desert 37,443 Arterial Street 52,000 0.72 C Fred Waring Dr. College of the Desert San Pablo Av. 37,703 Arterial Street 52,000 0.73 C Fred Waring Dr. San Pablo Av. Portola Av. 38,875 Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C Fred Waring Dr. Portola Av, Deep Canyon Rd. 36,485 Arterial Street 52,000 0.70 B Fred Waring Dr, Deep Canyon Rd. Cook St. 45,349 Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 D Fred Waring Dr, Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 42,346 Arterial Street 52,000 0.81 D Fred Waring Dr. Eldorado Dr. California Dr. 43,381 Arterial Street 52,000 0.83 D Fred Waring Dr. California Dr. Warner Tr. 41,887 Arterial Street 52,000 0.81 D Fred Waring Dr, Warner Tr. Washington St. 48,530 Arterial Street 52,000 0.93 E Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. 32,123 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.00 E SR-111 Bob Hoe Dr. Parkview Dr. 70,086 Arterial Street 52,000 1.35 F SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Warina Dr. 60,780 Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F SR-111 Fred Waring Dr, Desert Crossin 42,895 Arterial Street 52,000 0,82 D SR-111 Desert Crossinq El Paseo/Town Center W . 43,566 Arterial Street 52,000 0.84 D SR-111 El Paseo/Town Center W . Plaza WY 39,677 Arterial Street 52,000 0.76 C SR-111 Plaza W . Monterey Av. 41,814 Arterial Street 52 000 0'801 C SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. 50,520 Arterial Street 52,000 0.97 E TABLE 7-1 (CONTINUED) PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE AT 1-10 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE VOLUME/CAPACITY SUMMARY FINAL ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO FORECAST CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C I 1- S SR-111 San Pablo Av. San Luis Rey Av. 52,540 Arterial Street 52,000 1.01 F SR-111 San Luis Rev Av. Portola Av. 54,937 Arterial Street 52,000 1.06 F SR-111 Portola Av. El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. 53,451 Arterial Street 52,000 1.03 F SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Dee Can on Rd. 64,501 Arterial Street 52,000 1.24 F SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. 64,427 Arterial Street 52,000 1.24 F SR-111 Hos italit Dr. Cook St. 66,499 Arterial Street 52,000 1.28 F SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr. 72,064 Arterial Street 52,000 1.39 F SR-111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. 76,466 Arterial Street 52,000 1.47 F Mesa View Dr. SR-74 Portola Av. 3,363 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.11 A Haystack Rd. SR-74 Portola Av, 928 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.03 A 42nd Av. Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. 3,594 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.11 A Hovley Ln.West Monterey Av. Portola Av. 2,358 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.07 A 35th Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Unnamed Rd, 6,929 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.22 A Lucas Way Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 4,339 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.14 A Unnamed Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. 3,883 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.12 A California Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. 1,426 Collector Street 14,000 0.10 A Warner Tr. Av.of the States Fred Waring Dr. 9,311 Collector Street 14,000 0.67 B Bob Hoe Dr. 18th Av. 20th Av, 6,111 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.19 A Bob Hoe Dr. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 8,479 Secondary Road 32,000 0.26 A Bob Hoe Dr. 22nd Av. 30th Av. 8,211 Collector Street 14,000 0.59 A Dillon Rd, 18th Av. Dowell Ln, 2,339 lArterial Street 52,000 0.04 A 20th Av. Bob Hoe Dr. Dowell Ln. 2,804 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.09 A 22nd Av. Bob Hoe Dr. Dowell Ln. 600 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.02 A Dowell Ln. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 657 1 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.02 A Dillon Rd. 20th Av. Dowell Ln, 2,316 Arterial Street 52,000 0.04 A 20th Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 2 144 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.07 A 22nd Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. 151 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.00 A Dillon Rd. 20th Av. 22nd Av. 3,234 Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Hovley Ln. E. 1,561 Arterial Street 52,000 0.03 A Dillon Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. n/o Dillon Rd. 1,483 Arterial Street 52,000 0.03 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av, Dillon Rd. 2,568 Collector Street 14,000 0.18 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. s/o 26th Av. 4,322 Collector Street 14,000 0.31 A 26th Av. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. e/o Thousand Palms Canyon Rd, 1,334 SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.04 A U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\(00055-04.xls)T7-1 d EXHIBIT 7-13 NO PORTOLA AVENUE INTERCHANGE .d VOLUME/CAPACITY RATIO � 19 Dd DOS ov DD6 Woo .02 o 4 M 0.w 039 0.00 sl .wvi�w cw ova �°s � .at IS rarwc Dw 0n Da g s sR on o.n , n ' oV osa r or t ns r m us ozi 04 m 119 Zt INSET A fi 8 8 Der z 0 o.e 0.i o-I tx tw osa re tsa '2, o on 'n P 0- azz oa om 0 Dll oz rD.r�aY«rrr0rr[ 11 or Ol 0$ 0M D.A O]i pDaa 0.6 1.15 9z a ',o,y� 0.rz tAl 0s, O.o6 O.IS 0- 0.16 o.w DS ,lovrFY lx v+es. tAi rzs 0.w on m e t r zr N on oY'.t o� D9a 0z1 •Y.D.M 0 t9 1rX.Ktr,.IN13 Di 0.11 >6 it rF9 0 OY ® q 0.1 � OM wEo wwMpDrr 10 0.41 O.it OD SEE INSET A a u. onon ou r� N rTI r�a 0. 0.14 DI S \rgenrlutv0w S s LEGEND: om 0.88 =VOLUME/CAPACITY PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:NoPortVC URBAN 7-7 TABLE 7-2 PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY COMPARISON WITH WITHOUT INTERCHANGE INTERCHANGE ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C I LOS V/C I LOS Desert Crossing north of SR-111 SR-111 Collector Street 14,000 0.111 A 0.11 A Desert Crossing SR-111 south of SR-111 Collector Street 14,000 0.611 B 0.61 B Town Center W . Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.25 A 0.25 A El Paseo SR-111 Plaza W . Other Roadway 32,000 0.28 A 0.26 A El Paseo SR-111 Portola Av. Other Roadway 32,000 0.21 A 0.21 A Plaza W . Shopping Center SR-111 Collector Street 14,000 0.32 A 0.32 A Monterey Av, Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E 1.071 F Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 1.03 F 1.22 F Monterey Av. 1-10 EB Rams Dinah Shore Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 1.25 F 1.60 F Monterey Av. Dinah Shore Dr, Gerald Ford Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.81 D 0.86 D Monterey Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.63 B 0.55 A Monterey Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Count Club Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.64 B 0.60 A Monterey Av. Country Club Dr. Parkview Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.751 C 0.74 C Monterey Av. Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.62 B 0.631 B Monterey Av, Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Arterial Street 52,000 0.57 A 0.55 A v Monterey Av. SR-111 El Paseo Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.22 F 1.26 F I College of the Desert north of Fred Waring Dr, Fred Waring Dr. Collector Street 14,000 0.31 A 0.32 A Co College of the Desert Fred Waring Dr. south of Fred Waring Dr. Collector Street 14,000 0.07 A 0.07 A San Pablo Av. Magnesia Falls Dr, Fred Waring Dr. Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.32 A 0.31 A San Pablo Av. Fred Waring Dr, SR-111 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.40 AKO.42 A San Pablo Av. SR-111 El Paseo Scenic SecondaryRoadway32,000 0.20 A1 A San Luis Re Av. SR-111 El Paseo Collector Street 14,000 0.49 A5 A Portola Av. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 0.66 80 N/A Portola Av. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C0 N/A Portola Av. 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.93 E0 N/A Portola Av. Gerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Major Thorou hfare 32,000 0.97 E2 E Portola Av. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 15 1.23 F 1. F Portola Av. Count Club Dr. Hovle Ln, E. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.98 E .15 E Portola Av. Hovley Ln, E. Magnesia Falls Dr. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.89 D 0.86 D Portola Av. Magnesia Falls Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.76 C 0.72 C Portola Av. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.76 C 0.77 C Portola Av. SR-111 El Paseo Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.40 A 0.40 A Deep Canyon Rd. Magnesia Falls Dr, Fred Waring Dr, Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.61 B 0.63 B Deep Canyon Rd. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.73 C 0.701 B Deep Canyon Rd. SR-111 Fairway Dr. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A 0.25 A Hospitality Dr. north of SR-111 SR-111 Collector Street 14,000 0.13 A 0.14 A Hospitality Dr. SR-111 south of SR-111 Collector Street 14,000 0.42 A 0.42 A Chase School Rd. Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. Arterial Street 52,000 0.59 A 0.58 A Chase School Rd. Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 D 1.12 F Cook St. 1-10 WB Rams 1-10 EB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 0.99 E 1.29 F Cook St 1-10 EB Rams Gerald Ford Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 1.19 F 1.47 F Cook St JGerald Ford Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F 1.20 F Cook St IFrank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.89 D 0.92 E Cook St. lCountry Club Dr. Hovley Ln.E. Arterial Street 52,000 0.99 E 1.01 F-11 TABLE 7.2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY COMPARISON WITH WITHOUT INTERCHANGE INTERCHANGE ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C I LOS- V/C I LOS Varner Rd. I-10 WB Rams Adams St. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.70 B 0.70 B 1-10 Fw . W/O Bob Hoe Dr. Bob Hope Dr. 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.31 F 1.31 F I-10 Fw . Ramon Rd. Monterey Av. 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.38 F 1.36 F 1-10 Fw . Monterey Av. Portola Av. 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.43 F 1.42 F 1-10 Fw . Portola Av. Cook St. 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.46 F 1.42 F 1-10 Fw . Cook St. Washington St. 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.42 F 1.40 F 1.10 Fw . Washington St. E/O Washington St. 8-lane Freeway 160,500 1.281 F 1.251 F Country Club Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.641 B 0.65 B Country Club Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.481 A 0.45 A Country Club Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. Arterial Street 52,000 0.551 A 0.56 A Country Club Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. Arterial Street 52.000 0.651 B 0.65 B Count Club Dr. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.481 A 0.49 A Country Club Dr. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. Arterial Street 52,000 0.761 C 0.80 C Country Club Dr. Washington St. Av.42 Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.801 C 0.801 C Hovley Ln. E. Portola Av. Cook St. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.441 A 0.441 A Hovley Ln. E. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. Ma'or Thoroughfare 32,000 0.711 C 0.751 C v Hovley Ln. E. Eldorado Dr. Oasis Club Dr. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.851 D 0.871 D I Hovley Ln. E. Oasis Club Dr. Washington St. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.591 A 0.65 8 Av.42 Washington St, Adams St. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.811 D 0.86 D Magnesia Falls Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. Scenic Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.21 A 0.18 A Magnesia Falls Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. Scenic Secondary Roadway 32.000 0.09 A 0.11 A Painters Path Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Collector Street 14,000 0.20 A 0.20 A Parkview Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.30 A 0.34 A Parkview Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A 0.271 A Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Monterey Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0,47 A 0.441 A Fred Waring Dr. Monterey Av. College of the Desert Arterial Street 52,000 0.751 C 0.721 C Fred Waring Dr. College of the Desert San Pablo Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C 0.731 C Fred Waring Dr. San Pablo Av. Portola Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.79 C 0.751 C Fred Waring Dr. Portola Av. Deep Canyon Rd. Arterial Street 52,000 0.79 C 0.701 B Fred Waring Dr. Deeo Canyon Rd. Cook St. Arterial Street 52,000 0.96 E 0.871 D Fred Waring Dr. Cook St. Eldorado Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E 0.81 D Fred Waring Dr. Eldorado Dr. California Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D 0.83 D Fred Waring Dr. California Dr. Warner Tr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.87 D 0.81 D Fred Waring Dr. Warner Tr. Washington St. Arterial Street 52,000 1.051 F 0.93 E Fred Waring Dr. Washington St. Jefferson St. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 1.10 F 1.00 E SR-111 Bob Hoe Dr. Parkview Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 1.32 F 1,35 F SR-111 Parkview Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 1.17 F 1.171 F SR-111 Fred Waring Dr. Desert Crossing Arterial Street 52,000 0.79 C 0.82 D SR-111 Desert Crossing El Paseo/Town Center W . Arterial Street 52,000 0.80 C 0.84 D SR-111 EI Paseo/Town Center W . Plaza W . Arterial Street 52,000 0.71 C 0.76 C SR-111 Plaza W . Monterey Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.75 C 0.80 C SR-111 Monterey Av. San Pablo Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.91 E 0.97 E SR-111 San Pablo Av. San Luis Rey Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E 1.01 F SR-111 San Luis Rey Av, Portola Av. Arterial Street 52,000 1.00 E 1.06 F TABLE 7-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY COMPARISON WITH WITHOUT INTERCHANGE INTERCHANGE ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS V/C LOS Cook St. Hovley Ln,E. Fred Waring Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.72 C 0.76 C Cook St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Arterial Street 52,000 0.69 B 0.76 C Cook St. SR-111 Fairway Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.14 A 0.14 A Emerald Desert Dr. Kalahari Desert Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Collector Street 14.000 0.15 A 0.16 A Eldorado Dr. Frank Sinatra Dr. Country Club Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A 0.06 A Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln.E. Arterial Street 52,000 0.21 A 0.21 A Via Toscana Hovley Ln,E. Pisa Collector Street 14,000 1 0.20 A 0.21 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Arterial Street 52,000 0.19 A 0.17 A Eldorado Dr. SR-111 Fairway Dr. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.30 A 0.30 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Dillon Rd. Ramon Rd. Arterial Street 52,000 0.08 A 0.08 A Oasis Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. Major Thoroughfare 32.000 0.20 A 0.211 A Washington St. Av.38 Varner Rd. Arterial Street 52,000 1.21 F 1.20 F Washington St. Varner Rd. 1-10 EB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 1.40 F 1.41 F Washington St, 1-10 EB Rams Country Club Dr, Arterial Street 52,000 1.441 F 1.46 F Washington St. Country Club Dr. Hovley Ln. E. Arterial Street 52,000 0.841 D 0.84 D Washington St. Hovley Ln.E. Fred Waring Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.871 D 0.88 D Washington St. Fred Waring Dr. SR-111 Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D 0.85 D v Dillon Rd. Hot Springs Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. Arterial Street 52,000 0.07 A 0.07 A Ramon Rd. Bob Hoe Dr. 1-10 EB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 0.90 D 0.93 E Ramon Rd, 1-10 EB Rams 1-10 WB Rams Arterial Street 52,000 0.55 A 0.58 A Ramon Rd. 1-10 WB Rams Varner Rd. Arterial Street 52,000 0.55 A 0.58 A Ramon Rd. Varner Rd. Monterey Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.44 A 0.46 A Ramon Rd, Monterey Av, Chase School Rd. Arterial Street 52,000 0.301 A 0.30 A Dinah Shore Dr. Bob Hope Dr. Monterey Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.901 D 0.97 E Dinah Shore Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.16 F 1.55 F Gerald Ford Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.77 C 0.68 B Gerald Ford Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av, Arterial Street 52,000 0.84 D 0.62 B Gerald Ford Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. Arterial Street 52,000 0.66 B 0.811 D Gerald Ford Dr. Cook St. Frank Sinatra Dr. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.51 A 0.52 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Bob Hoe Dr. Monterey Av. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.78 C 0,80 C Frank Sinatra Dr. Monterey Av. Portola Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.53f A 0.55 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Portola Av. Cook St. Arterial Street 62,000 0.501 A 0.64 8 Frank Sinatra Dr. Cook St. Gerald Ford Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.161 A 0.17 A Frank Sinatra Dr. Gerald Ford Dr. Eldorado Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 0.341 A 0.36 A Av.38 Varner Rd. Washington St. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.77 C 0.77 C Tamarisk Row Dr. Eldorado Dr. Country Club Dr. Major Thoroughfare 32,000 0.47 A 0.51 A Varner Rd. Monterey Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.91 E 1.29 F Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Monterey Portola Av. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.54 A 0.71 C Varner Rd. Portola Av. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.40 F 0.71 C Varner Rd. 1-10 WB Ramp at Portola Chase School Rd. Secondary Roadway 32,000 1,00 E 0.71 C Varner Rd. Chase School Rd. Av.38 Secondary Roadway 32,000 1.17 F 1.14 F Varner Rd. Av, 38 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washington Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.20 A 0.20 A Varner Rd. 1-10 WB On Ramp at Washington Washington St. Secondary Roadway 32.000 0.47 A 0.421 A Varner Rd. lWashington St. 1-10 WB Rams Arterial Street 1 62,000 0.50 A 0.51 A TABLE 7-2(CONTINUED) PALM DESERT PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE VOLUME/CAPACITY COMPARISON WITH WITHOUT INTERCHANGE INTERCHANGE ROADWAY ROADWAY SEGMENT FROM TO CLASSIFICATION CAPACITY V/C LOS V/C LOS SR-111 Portola Av. El Paseo/Cabrillo Av, Arterial Street 52,000 0.94 E 1.03 F SR-111 El Paseo/Cabrillo Av. Deep Canyon Rd. Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F 1.24 F SR-111 Deep Canyon Rd. Hospitality Dr. Arterial Street 52,000 1.16 F 1.24 F SR-111 Hospitality Dr. Cook St. Arterial Street 52,000 1.19 F 1.28 F SR-111 Cook St. Eldorado Dr, Arterial Street 52,000 1.27 F 1.39 F SR-111 Eldorado Dr. Miles Av. Arterial Street 52,000 1.39 F 1.47 F Mesa View Dr. SR-74 Portola Av. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.121 A 0.111 A Haystack Rd. SR-74 Portola Av. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.031 A 0.03 A 42nd Av. Hovley Ln,E. Cook St. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.11 A 0.11 A Hovley Ln. West Monterey Av. Portola Av. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.08 A 0.07 A 35th Av. Dinah Shore Dr. Unnamed Rd. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.44 A 0.22 A Lucas Way Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av, Secondary Roadway 32.000 0.12 A 0.14 A Unnamed Rd. Dinah Shore Dr. 35th Av. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.14 A 0.12 A California Dr. Fred Waring Dr, Warner Tr. Collector Street 14,000 0.10 A 0.10 A Warner Tr. Av.of the States Fred Waring Dr. Collector Street 14,000 0.64 B 0.67 B Bob Hoe Dr. 18th Av. 20th Av. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.19 A 0.19 A Bob Hoe Dr. 20th Av. 22nd Av. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.26 A 0.26 A Bob Hoe Dr. 22nd Av. 30th Av. Collector Street 14,000 0.59 A 0.59 A Dillon Rd. 18th Av. Dowell Ln. Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 A 0.041 A 20th Av. Bob Hoe Dr. Dowell Ln. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.09 A 0.09 A 22nd Av. Bob Hoe Dr. Dowell Ln. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.02 A 0.02 A Dowell Ln. 20th Av. 22nd Av. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.02 A 0.02 A Dillon Rd. 20th Av. Dowell Ln. Arterial Street 52,000 0.05 A 0.04 A 20th Av. Dowell Ln. Dillon Rd. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.07 A 0.07 A 22nd Av. Dowell Ln, Dillon Rd. Secondary Roadway 32,000 0.01 A 0.00 A Dillon Rd. 20th Av. 22nd Av. Arterial Street 52,000 0.06 A 0.061 A Eldorado Dr. Fred Waring Dr. Hovley Ln. E. Arterial Street 52,000 0.051 A 0.031 A Dillon Rd. Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. n/o Dillon Rd. Arterial Street 52,000 0.03 A 0.03 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av. Dillon Rd. Collector Street 14,000 0.19 A 0.18 A Thousand Palms Canyon Rd. 26th Av, s/o 26th Av. Collector Street 14,000 0.31 A 0.31 A 26th Av, Thousand Palms Can on Rd. e/o Thousand Palms Can on Rd. Seconda Roadwa 32,000 0.04 A 0.04 A U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\[00055-04.xis]T7-2 ' been updated to reflect regional (CVATS) travel pattern changes (including additional traffic on the 1-10 Freeway), more recent local knowledge (such as improvements at the Bob Hope Drive/Ramon Road interchange and additional development now anticipated to occur north of the 1-10 Freeway), and land use changes for the Preferred General Plan scenario. Daily traffic volume forecasts from the Desert Gateway with and without the interchange are shown on Exhibits 7-C and 7-D, respectively. The rest of this section contains excerpts from the Desert Gateway Study. Post 2020 intersection levels of service for the existing network with the proposed (Desert Gateway) project (Alternative 1 — Preferred) with the Portola Avenue Overcrossing/Interchange are shown in Table 7-3. Table 7-3 shows HCM calculations based on the geometrics at the study area intersections without and with improvements. Post 2020 with project (Alternative 1 — Preferred) with the Portola Avenue Overcrossing/Interchange AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibits 7-E and 7-F, respectively. i For Post 2020 with project (Altemative 1 — Preferred) traffic conditions with the Portola Avenue Overcrossing/Interchange, the following study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "D" to "F" during the peak hours, without improvements: Bob Hope Drive (NS) at: • Ramon Road (EW) • Dinah Shore Drive (EW) • Gerald Ford Drive (EW Varner Road (NS) at: • Ramon Road (EW) 7-12 EXHIBIT 7-C POST 2020 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) WITH PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE 62.0 9 a t' RAMON RD. Ln 65.9 80.9 51.2 36.0 16.3 Io ri m 7) S 46.6 Q) DINAH SHORE DR. 35.3 37.4 20:1 i MARKET PLACE WY-y. I� SITE 4s „ >a. Lu Lu 3.6 35TH AVE. i a V9q p "" ~ i `` i1 G lO'2yyRg0 m p od lui ►oo ;�qq ao m a 1 l ai ` N GERALD FORD DR. 22.8 35.8 27.5 28.6 Q co ui t %9 'A V co K m m v~i 14.2 co Y v 0O v v FRANK SINA27RA DR. 18.9 v ` LEGEND: SOURCE: DESERT GATEWAY TIA 10.0=VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'5) (Urban Crossroads 10/18/02) PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:292-163 URBAN 7-13 EXHIBIT 7-D POST 2020 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE 65.3 9 v, .o RAMON RD. I^ 66.3 83.4 51.7 36.0 16.2 vi M 78 s 51.2 �38 DINAH SHORE DR. 00 36.0 36.2 26 MARKET PLACE WY-- 4.5 SITE `�� QMir+ I1 `% 01 Lu 0 m F 3.4 T 357H AVE. 4�'9 s z _ O OLn I� u� co to 1 IN I�� 00 1 1� 1 �♦ GERALD FORD DR. 22.1 23.0 Lu 21.2 32.6 Q 00 t O Q 1 c n cr m O a N 13.8 rn Y rn m O ^� O � v FRANK SINATRA DR. 20.0 27.9 r*i v LEGEND: SOURCE: DESERT GATEWAYTIA 10.0=VEHICLES PER DAY(1000'S) (Urban Crossroads 10/18/02) PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL Palm Desert California-00055:292-179 URBAN 7-1 4 TABLE 7-3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR POST 2020 WITH PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- DELAY' ;AM VEL OF TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND (SECS.) RVICE INTERSECTION CONTROL' L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM PM Bob Hope Dr. (NS)at: Ramon Rd. (EW) Without Improvements TS 2 0 1> 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 -° - F F -With Improvements TS 2 0 1>> 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 31.8 33.4 C C Dinah Shore Dr. (EW) Without Improvements TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 41.3 57.2 D E With Improvements TS 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1> 1 2 1 26.8 34.0 C C Gerald Ford Dr. (EW) Without Improvements TS 2 2 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 54.1 62.4 D E -With Improvements TS 2 2 1> 2 2 1 1 2 0 2 2 1> 33.3 34.3 C C Varner Rd. (NS)at: Ramon Rd. (EW) -Without Improvements TS 1 2 1 1 2 1» 1 2 1 1 2 1 52.7 - D F With Improvements TS 1 2 1 1 2 1» 2 3 0 1 3 0 34.9 34.8 C C Monterey Ave. INS)at: Ramon Rd. (EW) Without Improvements AWS 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 - - F F -With Improvements TS 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1> 1 2 1 25.6 34.1 C C Varner Rd_ (EW) -Without Improvements TS 2 2 1» 1 3 1>> 1 1.5 1.5 2 2 1 37.5 31.3 C C 1-10 Fwy.WB Ramps(EW) TS 2 2 0 0 3 1» 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 25.3 33.9 C C 1-10 Fwy. EB Ramps(EW) -Without Improvements TS 0 3 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 13.3 - B F -With Improvements TS 0 3 1 2 3 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 19.5 28.4 B C Dinah Shore Dr.(EW) Without Improvements TS 2 3 0 1 3 1» 2 1 1 1 2 0 F F With Improvements TS 2 3 0 2 3 1» 2.5 1_5 1 1 2 1> 35.3 47.7 D D -With Urban Interchange TS 2 0 1> 1 0 1>> 2 2 1 1 2 1> 28.2 31.7 C C -With Maximum Improvements TS 2 3 1 2 3 1» 2_5 1_5 1> 1 2 1>> 26.2 33.3 C C Market Place Wy.(EW) -With Improvements TS 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 24.6 32.0 C C Project Dwy. (EW) -With Improvements CSS 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16.0 15.1 C C 35th Ave. (EW) -With Improvements TS 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 9.5 9.9 A A When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left;T=Through; R=Right;>=Right Turn Overlap; »=Free Right Turn; 1 =Improvement z Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Traffix,Version 7.5.1015(2000). Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control,the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)are shown. TS=Traffic Signal;AWS=All-Way Stop; CSS=Cross Street Stop --=Delay High,Intersection Unstable,Level of Service"F". ource: Desert Gateway TIA(Urban Crossroads,Inc.,October 18,2002) 7-15 TABLE 7-3 (CONTINUED) INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR POST 2020 WITH PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING / INTERCHANGE INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- FDELA e LELOFTRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND (SECS_) SERVICE INTERSECTION CONTROL L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM • Gerald Ford Dr. (EW) Without Improvements TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 41.5 49.6 D D With Improvements TS 1 3 0 1 3 1> 2 2 0 2 2 1 33.1 34.8 C C • Frank Sinatra Dr.(EW) Without Improvements TS 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 38.3 -° D F With Improvements TS 2 2 1 1 3 0 2 2 1> 1 2 0 26.3 34.7 C C Project Dwy. (NS)at: • Dinah Shore Dr. (EW) -With Improvements TS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 12.1 13.5 B B Lucas Wy.(NS)at: Dinah Shore Dr. (EW) -With Improvements TS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 12.2 14.3 B B Dinah Shore Dr. (NS)at: 35th Ave. (EW) -With Improvements TS 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 22.6 34.1 C C Portola Ave. (NS)at: Varner Rd. (EW) -With Improvements TS 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 26.7 24.2 C C 1-10 WB Ramps(EW) -With Improvements TS 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 19.2 24.1 B C 1-10 EB Ramps(EW) -With Improvements TS 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 11.5 14.4 B B • Dinah Shore Dr. (EW) I i . -With Improvements TS 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 23.8 31.7 C C Gerald Ford Dr. (EW) Without Improvements AWS 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 - F F With Improvements TS 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 31.9 31.9 C C Cook St.(NS)at: 1-10 Fwy.WB Ramps(EW) TS 0 2 1» 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8.6 18.4 A B 1-10 Fwy_ EB Ramps(EW) TS 0 3 0 1 3 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 25.1 25.4 C C Gerald Ford Dr. (EW) Without Improvements TS 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 37.1 47.6 D D -With Improvements TS 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1> 29.8 34.8 C C When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left;T=Through;R=Right;>=Right Turn Overlap;»=Free Right Turn; _ #Improvement z Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Traffix,Version 7.5.1015(2000). Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control,the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)are shown, ' TS=Traffic Signal;AWS=All-Way Stop n -=Delay High,Intersection Unstable,Level of Service"F". Source: Desert Gateway TIA(Urban Crossroads,Inc.,October 18,2002) \U cJo bs\00055\Ex ce I\[00055-04.x Is)T7-3 7-16 EXHIBIT 7-E POST 2020 AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE 00 1276663-�r;814 1135 ► ��461 6 1 :1'*5 9 1� J L_ 9 -3292 16-! 7 46-J ' 29 oDW 3— t 353Nv--x v)^ mo, 52 � � ! f r vrn nv� RAMON RD. 9 -97�^ > �vo L-192 nnN J (► f-1 19 104-J rrlicnN L--383 699— , } r —284 J { L C>cn, vrn L-19 264-� MID 820-! } r J �► 6�4 179:► ono 106-i ivuf 295--i r} 189:! M} r L Lnrn 124� v� L-119 DINAR SHORE DR. 1 _`\\ oR�FR J �► i�79 'ciyy�q 46- 1 t r PLACE WY--- SITE �`•� 74-i �� I v, � � % w JI ` Q i 11�3 �� i �` S rn`D Z 1 `` LR L-79 0 — A R oIc �• �r GERALD F D DR. ui � Q `♦ o Q � rmw- p L-254`-252 '8s° ° 8 1t100-J J n�► � o186 I opn a Na �-105 65 Lrxn rn v - - 0�8 � -49 r iL 79; 6Qp4�1To 1881�;rnL — } r!-4p FRANK 4 /�7 3 f-4p 55nSINATRA . UL� L90 L-173 L-236jif rjr.-, n� f-744 ��L f-06 L e o SOURCE: DESERT GATEWAY TIA j 9- t r 379� t 1Q6� 1 tr (Urban Crossroads 70/18/D2) 359� �ryr.r- ►` PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:292-112 URBAN 7-17 EXHIBIT 7-F POST 2020 PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITH PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE f-93Al 95 `�c'�v' `1°� rAl 6z J �► �9 J i-422rkl 1251-- r )�6w�' S68� t r 291� 'i t r } 56-# t r -i M-ImOD 1A11� "' 1157� mory 720-� 638-� 3� N� COT RAMON RD. �8 490� /4g �4Sti 49 .-o+m L201 -.� � �► �18 mu)c'3 L431 vnf 186- v � ;k-234 70-! , --403 550- J +' f-85 rT o81143-# 4 327 ► "min 70-j , J rN 547 2387 21� C',h-m L ux+I 'mQ oy t-224 DINAH SHORE DR. 7 o f- J L149 I --- 73� t PLACE WY $ATE I j ,�`` z Q 1 Iwo L �� O o W __�� r. w 'T 35TH AVE f L t-149 co i �ARR t r m GERALD F D DR. ui > s, Q p � orn // rn.-m �83 L K s 57 J L f352 a� o g; 1tr O cove.- to oor.' y�,i, A-80 " ..1 L �82 %om Lab _rrDgrn 321� � } r J ► U � 852-► ern � 6 13 r.�or. 350 } L L75 � � FRANK f- SINATRA DR. 338:; �� r t r ^a co L100 r-pl L184 nrrxvv L373 J L �2° i�412 J f-10 SOURCE.DESERT GATEWAY TIA 841--� t } r �r (Urban Crossroads 10/18/02) 351—i r 219� } r 3$5� uw rnrro voo PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:292-113 URBAN cwoszwo..os 7-18 Monterey Avenue (NS)at: • Ramon Road (EW) • Varner Road (EW) • 1-10 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) • Dinah Shore Drive (EW) • Gerald Ford Drive (EW) • Frank Sinatra Drive (EW) Portola Avenue (NS) at: • Gerald Ford Drive (EW) Cook Street (NS) at: • Gerald Ford Drive (EW) For Post 2020 with (Desert Gateway) project (Alternative 1 — Preferred) traffic conditions with the Portola Avenue Overcrossing/Interchange, most study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "C" or better during the peak hours with the at-grade improvements listed in Table 7-3, except for the intersection of Monterey Avenue at Dinah Shore Drive, where the best Level of Service (LOS) that can be attained with a standard at-grade intersection is LOS "D". Constructing an urban interchange (grade separated northbound and southbound through movements) would provide LOS "C" traffic operations at this location; or the mitigation may include maximum at-grade improvements (e.g. triple left turn lanes and free-right turn lanes) without pedestrian minimum green time for all east-west pedestrians. Although four through lanes were tested, the increased pedestrian crossing time required still results in LOS "D" or worse traffic operations at this location. Post 2020 with project (Alternative 1 — Preferred) with the Portola Avenue Overcrossing/Interchange HCM calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix "P". 7-19 Post 2020 intersection levels of service for the existing network with the proposed project (Alternative 1 — Preferred) without the Portola Avenue Overcrossing/Interchange are shown in Table 7-4. Table 7-4 shows HCM calculations based on the geometrics at the study area intersections without and with improvements. Post 2020 with project (Alternative 1 — Preferred) without the Portola Avenue Overcrossing/Interchange AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibits 7-G and 7-H, respectively. For Post 2020 with project (Alternative 1 — Preferred) traffic conditions without the Portola Avenue Overcrossing/Interchange, the following study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "D" to "F" during the peak hours, without improvements: Bob Hope Drive (NS) at: • Ramon Road (EW) • Dinah Shore Drive (EW) • Gerald Ford Drive (EW Vamer Road (NS) at: • Ramon Road (EW) Monterey Avenue (NS) at: • Ramon Road (EW) • 1-10 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) • 1-10 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) • Dinah Shore Drive (EW) • Gerald Ford Drive (EW) • Frank Sinatra Drive (EW) Portola Avenue (NS) at: • Gerald Ford Drive (EW) 7-20 TABLE 7-4 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR POST 2020 WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/ INTERCHANGE INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- LDEY' LEVEL OF TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND .) SERVICE INTERSECTION CONTROL L T R L T R L T R L T RPM AM PM Bob Hope Dr.(NS)at: Ramon Rd.(EW) Without Improvements TS 2 0 1> 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 -4 - F F -With Improvements TS 2 0 1>> 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 0 23.9 29.2 C C • Dinah Shore Dr.(EW) Without Improvements TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 42.5 - D F -With Improvements TS 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1> 1 2 1 27.8 33.2 C C • Gerald Ford Dr.(EW) Without Improvements TS 2 2 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 49.4 61.8 D E With Improvements TS 2 2 1> 2 2 1 1 2 0 2 2 1> 31.7 33.5 C C Varner Rd. (NS)at • Ramon Rd.(EW) Without Improvements TS 1 2 1 1 2 1» 1 2 1 1 2 1 - - F F With Improvements TS 2 2 1 1 2 1» 2 3 1 1 3 0 33.2 31.3 C C Monterey Ave.(NS)at: • Ramon Rd.(EW) Without Improvements AWS 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1.5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 - - F F With Improvements TS 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1>> 1 2 1 31.8 30.5 C C • Varner Rd.(EW) -Without Improvements TS 2 2 1» 1 3 1>> 1 1.5 1.5 2 2 1 29.6 31.9 C C • 1-10 Fwy.WB Ramps(EW) -Without Improvements TS 2 2 0 0 3 1» 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 33.1 - C F -With Improvements TS 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 1>> 29.0 34.7 C C • 1-10 Fwy. EB Ramps(EW) -Without Improvements TS 0 3 1 2 2 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 32A - C F With Improvements TS 0 3 1 2 3 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 28.3 33.4 C C Dinah Shore Dr.(EW) Without Improvements TS 2 3 0 1 3 1» 2 1 1 1 2 0 - - F F With Improvements TS 2 4 0 3 3 1» 2.5 1_5 1> 1 2 1>> 37.6 48.8 D D With Urban Interchange TS 2 0 1> 2 0 1» 2 1 1 1 2 1> 23.0 29.4 C C With Maximum Improvements TS 2 4 0 3 3 1>> 2.5 1_5 1> 1 2 1>> 27.4 34.6 C C • Market Place Wy. (EW) -With Improvements TS 1 3 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 25.3 30.7 C C • Project Dwy.(EW) -With Improvements CSS 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 19.7 22.8 C C • 35th Ave. (EW) -With Improvements TS 0 3 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 12.0 12.6 B B When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left;T=Through; R=Right;>=Right Turn Overlap;>>=Free Right Turn; 1 =Improvement ' Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Traffix,Version 7.5.1015(2000). Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control,the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)are shown. ' TS=Traffic Signal;AWS=All-Way Stop;CSS=Cross Street Stop -=Delay High,Intersection Unstable,Level of Service"F". Source: Desert Gateway TIA(Urban Crossroads,Inc.,October 18,2002) 7-21 TABLE 7-4 (CONTINUED) INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR POST 2020 WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING /INTERCHANGE INTERSECTION APPROACH LANES NORTH- SOUTH- EAST- WEST- DELAY' LEVEL OF TRAFFIC BOUND BOUND BOUND BOUND (SECS.) SERVICE INTERSECTION CONTROL' L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM • Gerald Ford Dr. (EW) Without Improvements TS 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 37.7 45.6 D D With Improvements TS 1 3 0 1 3 1> 2 2 0 2 2 1 30.3 33.9 C C • Frank Sinatra Dr.(EW) Without Improvements TS 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 37.9 -° D F With Improvements TS 1 2 2 1 1 3 0 2 2 1> 1 2 0 27.3 34.8 C C Project Dwy. (NS)at: Dinah Shore Dr.(EW) -With Improvements TS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 :11 :2:0 11.9 14.9 B B Lucas Wy. (NS)at: • Dinah Shore Dr. (EW) -With Improvements TS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 11.9 16.4 B B Dinah Shore Dr.(NS)at: 35th Ave. (EW) -With Improvements TS 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 18.9 21.5 B C Portola Ave. (NS)at: Dinah Shore Dr.(EW) -With Improvements TS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 23.8 33.0 C C • Gerald Ford Dr.(EW) Without Improvements AWS 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 -- - F F With Improvements TS 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 27.6 30.6 C C Cook St.(NS)at: • 1-10 Fwy.WB Ramps(EW) TS 0 2 1>> 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 18.7 24.2 B C • 1-10 Fwy. EB Ramps(EW) TS 0 3 0 1 3 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 0 0 29.1 30.9 C C Gerald Ford Dr.(EW) Without Improvements TS 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 40.8 47.7 D D With Improvements TS 2 3 1 2 3 1? 2 2 1—> 2 2 1? 29.6 30.8 C C ' When a right turn is designated,the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L=Left,T=Through; R=Right;>=Right Turn Overlap;»=Free Right Turn; 1 =Improvement 2 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software:Traffix,Version 7.5.1015(2000). Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control,the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement(or movements sharing a single lane)are shown. TS=Traffic Signal;AWS=All-Way Stop ° —=Delay High,Intersection Unstable,Level of Service"F". Source: Desert Gateway TIA(Urban Crossroads, Inc.,October 18,2002) U:\UcJobs\00055\Excel\(00055-04.xls)T7-4 7-22 EXHIBIT 7-G POST 2020 AM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE 136'►0 N �° rn v ✓11ti6 ;gym �34 rinom �Z 0 r;:13.41. 6�;� �� J �► `-193 J �► f-136 J i-603 '�7 46-! 172 1273-� ,r �� 2Z7~ 1 }ODLr r 12s ' .-rvo 439-1 7-J } r rx. N RAMON RD. � w864 6 73j\ ��qs 7 4--163 nnN �ia ovnio 1251 } r �18 265--i ter: J t4 �► f-502 -► mom Mr, 803� � } r J � 172—106--) rZ 40 138� , } o t-119 DINAH SHORE DR. -_ 47 40 r9 i oRo �i 46� , } r PLACE WY SITE 74� �� 1 ,� ui 1 ItQ ` 1 Q Itv�1 1 `% 0 >- L---- 1� co "' lu 35TH AVE � a t � TT- t-79 0 i t GjDR r AD 1 t 1 wl�t rn � GERALD F D DR. ` Q % a � J t 4-258 O t rf-242 0 a 168-! } r 889— p oc000 188� rn� O'-118 371 f-24 a� —70 c 759� "wnr f-50 �-40 76� v FRANK 64-- ') r ?0 t f�3pS i Ir f-40 200� COO SINATRA DR. ko } r Mw rn L94 ?- -407 T4-176 c�DvrO1Din 4-276 J (- f-876 J f--10 14,-! 159� 351 -I } r 4-1 } f- 5% 10 359-► rvmo 827� 110:! } SOURCE: DESERT GATEWAY 3452 ,E (urban Crossroads 70/ta/oz) �r PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert,California-00055:292-173 URBAN 7-23 EXHIBIT 7-H POST 2020 PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES WITHOUT PORTOLA AVENUE OVERCROSSING/INTERCHANGE r rf- �_52�pp�� N 135 1043 r��`� Jf-172 f-196f-646 oon '�a��1�A 1188� 735-� mo 8 � mn 1 R" orn vo RAMON RD. 93 �7012 18 w9 ?2 3ti 4 _ 'L-256 J �► 8 f-125 108--J � } � �� -363 3 577~ J �► f-85 0^ nrvn vn� 1103-f } 285-� 70-! , t 198-i � 307--f - r»r 4-224 DINAH SHORE DR. J �► f-149 7O9Q 67:! 1 �r ♦ 74-► ,t PLACE WY-' SITE 1; ♦�� 74-i r.mn I IIN ui I Ilvr �` o� Q I 1�03 ♦♦ ❑ L-- _ —I� w W -T ,n 35TH AVE n a 1 mV H 1 f-78 O Lnlq 1 i `♦ 1 i i a, ` GERALD F D DR. ` ui `♦ Q `♦ J ; O woo k-318 �� J f-3833 O 162—f Y 629w �tr O 155—? oNOW nrlrn O o>vm 4-113 J L f-722 —93 0 786— t f-0 7 �2jS me L �40 137-� plow" 642- SINATRA DR. bb� tf ov Nn o o N °f vo t-105 as 4-219 �v�jir`O�Nm 4-344 J L 71 �► �92 J i 1. F-10 SOURCE DESERT GATEWAY TIA 430---� 768-� 1tf 771 1tf z30 1tI N (urban Crossroads 10/19/02) 449� tr%".rl 270-1 PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL, Palm Desert,Califomia-00055:292-174 URBAN 7-24 1 Cook Street (NS) at: • Gerald Ford Drive (EW) For Post 2020 with project (Alternative 1 — Preferred) traffic conditions without the Portola Avenue Overcrossing/Interchange, most study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service "C" or better during the peak hours with the at-grade improvements listed in Table 7-4 except for the intersection of Monterey Avenue at Dinah Shore Drive, where the best Level of Service (LOS) that can be attained with a standard at-grade intersection is LOS "D". Constructing an urban interchange (grade separated northbound and southbound through movements) would provide LOS "C" traffic operations at this location; or the mitigation may include maximum at-grade improvements (e.g. triple left turn lanes, four through lanes and free-right turn lanes) without pedestrian minimum green time. Post 2020 with project (Alternative 1 — Preferred) without the Portola Avenue Overcrossing/Interchange HCM calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix 7.2 Free Right Turn Lane Review The need for the eastbound free right turn lane planned from Gerald Ford Drive eastbound onto Cook Street southbound has been reviewed. Intersection analysis to achieve Level of Service "C" at the intersection was presented in Chapter 4. Alternative intersection analysis has been evaluated with the same improvements as previously, with the eastbound right turn lane having an overlap phase (and not free movement capabilities). The results of this analysis are included as Appendix "R". As shown in Appendix "R", LOS "C" can be attained with the same lane configurations, without the free right turn lane, but including an eastbound right turn overlap phase (arrow). 7-25 J THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK i . 7-26 8.0 ACCOMMODATIONS FOR ALTERNATIVE TRAVEL MODES The City of Palm Desert has facilities for bus, bike, golf cart, and pedestrian traffic to access the City and surrounding areas. Rail and Air terminals provide access to the City by long distance travelers. The currently adopted plans for these alternative travel modes have been evaluated in terms of the Circulation Plan, and recommendations are made to make these alternative modes even more desirable. Over the past decade, the City of Palm Desert has made a concerted effort to expand the options for pedestrians, bicyclists, and golf cart users as alternatives to the automobile. In addition to expanding the network of sidewalks and on-street bicycle and golf cart paths, the City has encouraged the development of integrated paths for non- motorized and/or golf cart use within planned developments. Capacity is generally not an issue for these alternative transportation systems. The primary determinants for these systems are therefore providing maximum feasible accessibility and reasonable levels of connectivity. 8.1 Golf Cart Plan Exhibit 8-A contains the current Golf Cart Plan throughout the City of Palm Desert. Golf carts are prohibited on SR-111, Fred Waring Drive, Monterey Avenue, and Washington Street. While not all other study area roadways are currently designated as golf cart routes, most facilities on the Circulation Plan are expected to (at some point) have golf cart access. 8.2 Bikeways The proposed Bikeway system for the City of Palm Desert is included as Exhibit 8-B. Bike facilities are proposed to provide access for bicyclists throughout the City. Consistent with the currently adopted General Plan Circulation Element, it 8-1 EXHIBIT 8-A CITY OF PALM DESERT GOLF CART TRANSPORTATION ROUTE MAP AVENUE 20 - - _. -- AVENUE 22 0 } 2 Q U h J 4� Z �e J �O I ■ DINA SHCFcE DR ■ G RALD;7CRD 0 Rq O r D FRA SINATZA )FRANK ATRA R O � COUNTR LUB DR a AVE 40 H EY LANE ST sees N n z AVE 42 y Lu !■ ..yr. o■ U) 4i • AFRED ARING DR ■ 1 fn o n z ■ %so41421 Y o ES AV oD v U cn r 1 FAIR AYDR p i ti ■ T PEVINE S i(J W b� v� LEGEND •STACK RD GOLF CART ROUTES 10 • ****CLASS 1 (EXISTING) c • *'*"CLASS 2(PLANNED) 2124 CLASS 3(PROPOSED FUTURE) • • ��GOLF CARTS PROHIBITED • PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL, Palm Desert,Califomia-00055:Gotf URBAN CROSSROADS 8-2 EXHIBIT 8-13 CITY OF PALM DESERT PROPOSED BIKEWAYS SYSTEM r ♦�, v i ♦v.a ,♦ ► ,, ` 1 �% t i o• t • _. ♦ i ■ t `t ■ ♦� ■ ♦ ■ P�ra — ---- worm wasolummumns grow Ifo famoomomoommom Too ommoo At lb LEGEND: ■ _� .. ■ ' =EXISTING BIKEWAY S-ORE°0. ,-��$ �� ■ ■ =PROPOSED BIKEWAY =PROPOSED BIKEWAY ■ 9 ■"� g■ (ARMY CORP.OF ENGS.) ■ � � "i =CLASS 1 BIKE/REGIONAL ■ a■ TRAIL(RCIP) ■ �1 : �- r =REGIONAL TRAIL(RCIP) +� ----- =COMMUNITY TRAIL(RCIP) ■■■■■ =CLASS 1 BIKE PATH(RCIP) � ,H11 on •V.! cotwim cue OR 3 ! L��Joe Y F�us ora , ;� . PfAm Amm NOTE:REGIONALIADJACENT PATHS SHOWN 1 �,, a=�• TO ILLUSTRATE CONNECTIVITY N Ir PALM DESERT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY,Palm Desert,Califomia-00055:127 URBAN cwouwowos 8-3 is recommended that bike facilities be provided on all study area roadways on some high speed Arterial Streets where safety would be an issue. 8.3 Bus Routes Current bus routes are shown on Exhibit 8-C. The SunDial service provides low cost public transportation for ADA certified riders. The City operates the Shopper Hopper, a free service to carry shoppers throughout the commercial areas around SR-111 and El Paseo in the east part of the City. The SunLink system begins in the City of Palm Desert on Town Center Way. It travels north to Fred Waring Drive, then East to Monterey Avenue, north to Ramon Road, and east to exit the City. SunLink takes riders to Western Riverside County Metrolink stations where they can transfer to other travel modes. 8.4 Pedestrian Access While pedestrian movements are prohibited for some study area intersections in the Buildout condition, pedestrian access is still available throughout the City. At intersections with limited pedestrian crossings, only one leg does not allow pedestrian crossing, therefore, pedestrians are still able to get across all streets. i 8-4 EXHIBIT 8-C SUNBUS SYSTEM MAP L �Py �'p RAMON GERALD FORD DR Y 8 FR*KSINVAINFA NTRY CLUB D a ps psIIII■IIII I■ II■II ///IIIIIII 0- 0 m � a v HOVLEY LN E A W i f Y 1 0_ < -_ 21212 FRrill WARING DR ui MILES V - 1 A 48 LEGEND i UNE NUMBER z 1*-69LINE 1t1 i LINE 70 --' m LINE 51 SHOPPER HOPPER AVE 50 1=1110 LINE 51 ' O LINE SO CSUSB LOOP m I LINE50 O AVE52 2 LINE 31 O K W m PALM DESERT TRAFFIC MODEL,Palm Desert, Califomia-00055-bus mxd URBAN - craossno..os 8-5 N THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 8-6