HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetters Recv'd for General Plan 1974-1975 COUNTRY CLUB PROPERTYOWNERS' ASSOCIATION XU✓L6W J�
73-743 HIGHWAY 111, P.O. BOX A7, PACIA DESERT, CA. 92260
(714) 346-1173
January 27, 1975
RECEIVED
JAN 2 8 1975
Honorable Mayor Henry Clark PALM DESERT CITY HALL
Citv of Palm Desert
45 275 Prickly Pear Lane
Palm Desert, California 92260
Dear Mayor Clark:
On behalf of our Association, we would like to commend your
action on January 20, 1975, relative to the adoption of the
new Palm Desert General Plan, which encompasses our
Association' s property in the adjacent county area north
of the city limits.
It was a most difficult and time consuming series of sessions,
hearings and debates, and we -Feel that all the hearings were
conducted in a most democratic, orderly manner. Also, that
the planning for our area in the unincorporated county was
constructive, imaginative and respective of a substantial
portion of the property owners in our area.
We look forward to continued cooperation with you, the
representatives of the City of Palm Desert, and wish you
every success in the implementation of your new General
Plan.
C rdia ,
E. George �Maola
President
EGM/c
%Not
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Ph. 346-0611
January 20, 1975
Mr. Charles Brewer , Superintendent
Coachella Valley Recreation & Park District
Post Office Drawer YYY
Indio, California 92201
Dear Mr . Brewer :
Pursuant to Planning Commission approval on December
30, 1974 , and approval by the Palm Desert City Council on
January 9, 1975, I am hereby authorized to inform you that
the Council , by unanimous vote, finds that the proposed
project for up-grading the Palm Desert Community Center-
Park Complex is compatible to both the existing Cove Com-
munities General Plan and the proposed Palm Desert General
Plan. Said action was taken by minute motion and approved
by Mayor Clark, Councilwoman Benson, Councilman Brush, and
Councilman McPherson.
Very truly yours,
HARVEY L. HURLBURT
City Manager
HLH:mp
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM "
City of Palm Desert
TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council
FROM: Paul A. Williams , Secretary to the City Council
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT ON RE- DATE:
QUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF COMPATI-
BILITY
On December 30 , 1974, the Planning Commission did
review the request of the Coachella Valley Recrea-
tion and Park District for a determination of com-
patibility of the Palm Desert Community Center-
Park complex to the City' s General Plan. The Plan-
ning Commission, by unanimous vote, has directed me
to inform the Council that the Planning Commission
recommends that the Council find the project com-
patible to both the existing General Plan and the
Proposed Palm Desert General .Plan.
PAW/kcw
� u
4
December 18 , .1974
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM : CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT : RECREATION DISTRICT COMMUNITY CENTER
The attached project refers to the existing Community
Center building west of the storm drain channel immediately
south of the Sandpiper development. The Park District anti-
cipates putting about 575 , 000 intb the project of which
approximately 534 , 000 will be from the State Bond Act monies .
The remaining monies will come from their general fund . Bob
Ricciardi is designing the project and at this point Chuck
Brewer is not sure of the timing . It would appear , however , that
they might phase some' of the work during this fiscal year period
since monies are available for the project and have been budgeted
in an unspecified amount. If they tie in with the Park Bond Act
monies , it will either be necessary for them to do the project in
two phases or put the entire project over into the 1975-76 fiscal
year . This is due to the fact that the monies will not be avail -
able until 1974-75 and as you are aware it is no.t possible to .
advance funds and then repay yourselves from the Bond Act monies .
HARVEY L . HURLBURT
t
1
e
n 4 �� l
ar��1 �J ` .7 � ,; ,L1,r 7�a�1f
V•V- Va` ✓.s'u.ram V 1. 0.a.• �v.v✓�v.. �►11�' {, �••4'a. C4L .i CV�t�tiVv
POST OrfICE DRAWER YYY
46.350 SOUTH JACKSON STREET INDIO, CAMORNIA 92201
�l 1. 19
`December 16, 1974
Mr. Harvey Hurlburt, City Mgr.
P.O. Lox 16,18
Palm D!:ert, California
Dear Fr. Hug-lburt:
The Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District has
designated the Pa?.m Desert Cc-s:;unity Center-"nark Ccmplc:x as
its pri-.2ry project for develoc:Icnt o:ith'use of funds frcm
the Sta;e- Recreational and Historical F'acil_ities
Bond Act of 1974.
A statement of ccm-)atibility of land use from the City Of
Palm Desert is c:Le of the many requirements of application for
funds. `Ina > ronosed ccrplex is located at 45-S25 "Jillo:'r Street-
wilsay E.nd .:::,z' n, "I alm Desert General Plan", indicate:; a park
at the sama location. Y
Based on your general plan, I assume our project is
compatible, a letter to that effect would be appreciated so
that va can proceed with our application.
Sincerely,
ar es Ert'.ler
Superintendent
jd
BOARD Of DIRECTORS
HAROLD CCUSINS GENE ROBERTS JEARL JESSON —
President Vice President Secretary
VICTOR HIGGINS DON MARIETTA CHARLES BREWER - y
Director Director Superintendent T.I.347.7485
1
{
January 13 , 1975
Mr. Paul William
Palm Desert City Hall
Palm Desert, CA 92260
ATTENTION: Mr. Paul Williams
Bekins Property Management respectfully requests that their
previous request for rezoning from Medium Density Residential
to Specialty Commercial be withdrawn until further notice.
Cord' ally yours ,
-dim Chapm
Presiden
JC
B. Discussion of a request dated December S , 1974 from
Jim Chapman , representing Bekins Fronerty Management
Company to change the land-use deignatiCorrcial
Medium Density Residential to Specialty Paseo and
for the parcel at the southwest cornethefCEtY Council .
State Highway 74 as referred bacl: YCorlmission recom-
Staff recommended that the Planning,
mend to the City Council that
the parcel be designated
as Medium Density Residenthat
Staff had received a letter aofd�enBekins3Property
from
Mr . Chapman, a representative be
Management Company reQdes 1 .ting thStaffat emadednotelthat
at Medium Density Res
if the applicant feels he woulodthr ugh theractualrs
change in the future he can g
request for a General Plan ame edmaid and
fullynawarend
the neighborhood can be
of what is being considered by the City .
Commissioner TZullins moved by minute motion that the
parcel be designated as Medium
Do ii Residential
and be recommended to to Y
Van de Mark seconded the motion anil the vote was
unanimous .
C. There was a discussion of a requests dated January 2 ,
1975 , from F.T. Kieley that the lard-use designation
Section-1, Township 5 South, %mge 6 East, S .B.B .&P1. V131?s-
for
be changed to Very Low Density KesWential as referred
back by the City Council . Staff forted that 20 acres
mmission Meeting _4_
1975
were east of Highway 74 and the remaining 632
acres west of Highway 74. A major portion is
shown as Very Low Density. The applicant was
requesting that this designation be given to
the full property so that he could obtain credit
in terms of the acreage , though he admits in
his letter that he proposes to build only on the
flatter portion of the side . The Staff reported
agreement with the applicant from the standpoint
that the entire property should be shown as 1-3
units per acre.
The Staff was of the opinion that the 20 acres
east of Highway 74 has additional problems with
regards to .drainage. This is a substantial flood
plain and perhaps more analysis should be made
with regards to protection of this side prior to
the granting of the land use designation on the
20 acres east of Highway 74.
Mr. T. Kieley, 2777 East Borisco, Palm Springs ,
stated that he understood the Staff ' s request
to be that when proper flood control is provided
that the land would be considered. Mr . Kieley
felt that it would not be a great expense to
get flood control.
Commissioner Van de Mark asked what provided
protection of the property on the southerly side.
Mr. Kieley answered her that there was a dike
installed already on the south side of the pro-
perty and from the bridge to the toe of the
mountain.
Commissioner Wilson was concerned with the Staff' s
recommendation that the entire area be zoned Very
Low Density. He felt that this development was
the last of the main entrances to our City.
Commissioner Van de Mark agreed that it should be
designated Very Low Density and to not include
the mountain areas in that amount.
Y
~ i
��l 3/rt,S'
nission Meeting
1975
Commissioner Mullins agreed that it' s appropriate
land use designtion for that area.
Commissioner Wilson asked how much of the 640 acres
were flat, developed land.
Staff stated that approximately 1/3 of the site
is developable.
Commission Wilson moved that the Planning Commission
recommend to the Council that this area remain as
shown on the General Plan as developed by Wilsey &
Ham. Commissioner Van de Mark seconded the motion.
Before a vote ensued, Commissioner Van de Mark asked
how the Planning Commission could make a compromise
to use 1/2 of it.
Mr . Ed Peck, 73-610 Buckboard Trail, stated that
it would allow nine to the acre on the flat area and
thought this would be the similar approach on show-
ing the flat area at 5-7 to the acre.
Commissioner Seidler then entertained the vote on
the motion. Commissioner Wilson and Van de Mark
voted yes and Commissioner Seidler and Mullins
voted no. Because of the tie vote no action could
be concurred and the tie vote would be given to
the Council as the Planning Commission' s recommend-
ation.
' � J
CIO YAM. 03 b5-
D. The discussion of a request from Elmer C. Rigby,
M.D. to designate a 9 acre , triano - p ^rcel
Ideated at the southeast corner of the intersection
of Portola Avenue and the t•Jhitewater Storm Channel
for commercial use, as referred back by the City
Council then ensued.
Dr. Rigby spoke to the Commission about his request
and his past experiences in trying to get the area
designated commercial .
After some discussion the Commissioners voted on
a motion made by Commissioner Wilson and seconded
by Commissioner Mullins teat the Planning Commission.
agree with Staff' s recommendation that the Commission
recommend to the City Council that the parcel be
designated ,.a.s Medium Density Residential . The vote
was unan;mbi .,
f.
• y'Y s
E. Determination of whether proposed Cook Street Waste-
water Collection Line is in compliance with proposed
Palm Desert General Plan was then discussed. After
some discussion the Commission agreed with Staff ' s
recommendation that it was in compliance and to
approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 29 .
Commissioner Mullins made the motion that they approve
Planning Commission Resolution No . 29=.and Commmissioner
Van de '.`dark seconded the motion. The vote was
unanimous .
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Ph. 346-061.1
December 31, 1974
This office has received your letter regarding the Gen-
eral Plan and related Environmental Impact Report dated
. Said letter was presented to the
Planning Commission at their public hearing on the Gen-
eral Plan on December 9 and has been -Forwarded to the
City Council for their consideration at their special
hearing on the general Plan which is scheduled for Janu-
ary 6 , 1975 .
I wish to thank you for your input on this General Plan
and related Environmental Impact Report and wish to as-
sure you that your comments will be fully evaluated by
both the Planning Commission and the City Council in
their deliberations on the General plan.
Very truly yours ,
Harvey L. Hurlburt
City Manager
HLH/kcw
P.O. SOX 201 /47-535 HIGHWAY 74/ PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260/TELEPHONE (714) 346-2697
The Reverend John A Herrison,Rector
November 19, 1974
The Planning Commission
City of Palm Desert
Palm D sert, California 92260
Gentlemen:
St. Margaret's Church, presently owning five acres of land at
47-535 Highway 74 in Palm Desert, respectfully requests a
change in land use designation for the five acres to R-3 zone.
The purpose for this request is the intention to construct a
home for retired persons on part of that land. Your acceding
to this request will be much appreciated.
Sincerely yours,
Cartwright Hunter
CH:tm Senior Warden
I T C H El.L Tv!AIN4 A G E3V1 EN T SIE R V I C E
Donald H. Mitchell David H. Mitchell
Cure and Supenlshm of Bute Gen-lensand Citrus Groves
PHONE 39S-4511
MAIL ADDRESS 13OX 833 . INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
November 197 1974
City cle-1,-,
Palm D--sert, C.
Dear Sir:
It t,.,as L.o.st intercs-buir,r, to listen to t"he n-o jections of future growth
IT
for our ciu`y as by a reprc.,sentative of Wilsey and 1-Jam at
the hearin- at the CoiiLmanity Church on I'liovember 12.
Accompanied by L. of Sacramento, ry partner in a date Carden
in the ai:a betwe-�.n the Cat'.-j,nlic Churclh and the site for the pro;�O Wed
hi�;b school, ,,,a o-ulostioned `U`Ihe speakcr ho-pin'- to learn how the prop�osed
1)a-G(3 Pal-i), Prcserve .-:ould af`_,cct us. referred us to the Plannin,,r�
Go-nnim-i ss-io-1-1 a---,.-- t1rct we Ireep in touch,
saying that final plans
would be some tire: in bein developed.
(D -
We are in .,.�ntby ijith ,.hat we pre sureis your objective, namely,
providing; pal,.--Is for Palm D sert. The desert partis provided by Klature;
the palms rust Ise L-,,,.,,n I s resp.o nsi.'0i1ity.
I would litre to point out two eXamples i,-ihich your Planning Commission
no doubt has alrea�.,:y studicd. '-,'he first being, the Sun Gold area,
Indio' s fil-st roa1- subdivision and unauestionably the moct- beautiful.
Fio;mes were built in a former c'-ato garden u-ith a few selector-' palms
retained on each lo-Q,*- for shade and es-ul-bet-ic effect. The second is the
border T.)1--.-rit-in- of rains on the Coll!-re of the Desert that has been a
most valuable -feature of an attractive and appropriate campus develop-
ment.
The sDealce.f si,',� -ested the possibility that as lon- as we kept the date
-, cw), , - C,
gard,--�n in TJr0_LU-C_C101',.1 the objcactimva of the Planners was being fulfilled
and later on vIhcn sucdivisio i fi
le most Leal f w.final uce as in el"fect,
4..h lo,4
that hor , oa the ol %e an usd in S,',n Gold ,.,ould be lo,nical. The amount
of time 1 1:2 1Z I.-I'lil be to operate the acrea-e is
probic:.a-tical, pos-Ab17 bet',,,.;een ton Zind i'i'L'U"oan -,yeal-s. Since both
!,Vbi ion and T are ;':�enior Gitizon_-" ,�Ia Ihave uhouabt about sellin-
the 22 acres we own. We are not r'nder pressure to disrio se of it, ho wever,
as it is well handled b,�i t.be ranc;b care pro-raTm managed b,-1 my son. t,,Te
do not, obviously, want a Date !Palm Roseve pro--ram to interfere with
a sale if and when we wan-,-, to mah-e a sale; nor do we want it to reduce
the value of the property.
City Clerk 2
November 19, 1974
The effectiveness of the border planting of date palms at College of
the Desert, some of which is being cropped, suggests that the idea
could be used somewhere in Palm twoert.
I have available about 100 jumbo date offshoots plus a few male palms
that should bO Planted nett April or Pay. These have trunks from three
to ten feet 11qa, no Ving about fiave. Our own crew could move the
sr allcr ones bit it could be batter to call in a professional to do the
whole job. 1 All quo to a favopable prico.
Should T,,ou to meet with your 7roup to ro into the matter in
mOyO d&qi! ! ' I! be happy to do so. The future Srowth of Palm Desert
is of real cancon".
The chanCe from the day whon thcre was only one house in the whole area
south of HiqUay 111, to the prew3nt state of vigorous growth, is
spectacular. Vur plan to Lake the future growtb harmonious is to be
commended.
Cordially yours,
,El J
D. H. Mitchell
Me
e
(714) 345-2831
INC-r
71
rx,
. 45-300 CLUB DRIVE INDIAN 'WELLS, CALIFORNIA 92250
�._�__ l:' -• ';• �' vac"vo
r
i
October 13,' 1974 '
Palm Desert City Council
P. O. Box 1648
Palm Desert, California 92260
Re: Preliminary Land Use Element of the Palm Desert General Plan
Gentlemen:
In the spirit of intergovernmental co-operation the Indian Wells City Council
has reviewed your Preliminary Concept for the Palm Desert General Plan
Land Use Element and offers the following recommendations:
1• The overall DENSITY shown is too great, particularly in
the "wind erosion areas lying between the White,=.pater
River Flood Channel and Interstate 10; and those 7-10
D. U. /Ac. categories which adjoin the City of Indian Wells.
2. Generally, very low densities of 1-4 dwelling units per
gross acre should be shown in a belt extending from
immediately north of the Whitewater to .within one mile
of Interstate 10. A one mile wide 'belt-1.-ing adjacent to
Interstate 10 may be appropriate for lo,. density.
(3-5 dwelling units per gross acre).
3. There is too much industrial indicated. Generally, it should
be limited to those as shown by the (current) Cove Communities
General Plan.( e. g. Monterey Avenue and Washington Street
at-the freeway).
Since Washington Street and 'Highway 1�1 have both been
adopted as "Scenic Corridors", the DELETION of INDUSTRL-
at Washington and 44th Avenue is strongly recommended.
,A e
Palm Desert City Council
October 18, 1974
Page 2.
4. With the exception of Monterey, by reducing densities, the
need for new freeway interchanges is deleted. Further, the
need for 'Idiagonal" roads as shown on the map is also reduced.
Consideration should be given toward deleting as many "diagonal"
roads as possible since property ownerships occur along
North-South and last-West basis throughout the area. (As
a practical matter, development of property and acquisition
of R/W is difficult to accomplish when roads bisect at acute
angles).
5. In the City of Indian Wells new crossings of the Whitewater
are not necessary and would result ultimately in unnecessary
expenditures of funds for bridges. These should be deleted
from the plan.
6. The "Sand Dune Preserve's could result in a costly acquisition
and maintenance problem. It would appear that there is less
expensive land available elsewhere in the region which could
be used for such a purpose.
The aforementioned comments only address themselves to the major concerns
of the concept and are not reflective of minor issues. We appreciate the
opportunity to convey our concerns to you, particularly on items having
regional as well as local impact, such as those shown by the plan.
Very truly yours,
JG' EYIl E. ,
Mayor
369 PINE STREET • SUITE 320
SAN FRANC:ISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
November 22, 1974
Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director
Environmental Services
City of Palm Desert
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Dear Mr. Williams :
It has been brought to our attention that there
is a proposal to rezone certain parts of the City of
Palm Desert,which are now a medium density zoning,
to a low density zoning, which, as I understand, al-
lows from three to five housing units per acre. At
the Council meeting of October loth, a tentative map
and conditional Use Permit for Tract #4442, with 6 .22
units per acre, were approved.
We have every hope and desire of proceeding with
this development as soon as the mortgage money market
would make it practicable. At this time , it is dif-
ficult to project how soon that will be , but it ap-
pears that recent changes in the prime rate are en-
couraging. We have planned a development which we
think will be extremely attractive and desirable
and certainly compatible with both the- environmental
and constructed surroundings.
This letter is to request that the pending re-
zoning be modified to leave intact the existing zoning
for the area of Tract ;#4442 , namely, medium density.
We appreciate the cooperation which we have re-
ceived from the City offices in general since their
incorporation, and hope that you will similarly give
consideration to this request.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONBiENTAL DEVELOP14EIZT
COMPANY
M.CD. JAYRED, Vice President
MDJ/mpm
cc: Mr. W. Scott Biddle
f
RIVERSIDE COUN f Y ` BERNARD J. CLARK, SHERIFF
PHONE 787-2444 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA
November 27 , 1974.
Mr. Harvey Hurlbert
City Manager
Post Office Box 1648
Palm Desert, California 92260
Dear Harvey:
In response to your request to comment on the Palm Desert
General Plan submitted by T%ilsey and Ham, Consultants , the follow-
ing is submitted. We've quoted the sections we see applicable,
and provided a broad response.
Section 6. 2 encompasses the safety element and contains the
following which relates to police protection.
6. 2.B. 1 Police protection is provided by the Riverside
County Sheriff ' s Department. The Sheriff' s
Department provides response service to requests
for service and investigative services in criminal
cases.
Comment The initial agreement between the City and the
Sheriff' s Department for law enforcement services
was to start with the minimum level of service
that was provided to the area prior to incorporation
by the Sheriff ' s Department and the California
Highway Patrol. This is the present staffing
pattern.
6. 2.B. 2 The City can plan for its own system of police
and fire protection in the future.
Comment The Sheriff will assist the City in planning for
the development of any level of law enforcement
services they determine desirable. The Sheriff ' s
Department has the capability of providing, through
contract, any level of law enforcement desired by
the City.
i
6. 2.P. 1 Continue its efforts to upgrade police and fire 4
protection in the City and establish periodic
review processes and standards to insure that
the service remains at high levels.
i
t
k
3
Letter to Harvey Hurlbert
r ove�n:3er 27 , 1974
Page 2
CoT,:,ment A contract for law enforcement services can be
wr_i.tten for any Level desired by the City which
would prOV4 d.e for prop er controls by both parties.
Constant rcvi.e�� of the service is an administrative
function s,, hich is accomplished . The results of the
revie:>; is the subject of discussion with the
city and the basis for action of upgrading.
Establish local representation of the law enforcement
ag`.ncy in the city as soon as possible.
Com�ient If the City feels that law enforcement office
space is required and should be staffed for a
specified number of hours per day due to the number
of walk-in complaints or requests for information,
the contract can reflect such an office. However ,
the cost of manning and supporting such an office
should be a factor to consiger.
General Coi,dnent
A. Our belief is that contract law enforcement is the most
reasonable method of providing a complete service for the
citizens of the City of Palm Desert.
Some of the specific on-going procedures taking place with
you and those of your neighbor city, which may be of interest:
1. (1) Lieutenant, (1) Sergeant, (2) Investigators , and
(14) L)eputi_es are assigne.0 full-time to the Cities
of Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage.
2 . Emphasis is being placed on a positive working
relationship with the coi?mzunity through both formal
and informal mechanisms.
3 . Deploy;ment and scheduling are based on workload and
the needs of the community.
4 . Representatives of social service agencies are being
utilized to acquaint the deputies with the resources
in and for the community.
5. Goals and objectives have been set and planned programs
have been established to meet these objectives
(management by objectives) .
6 . Two of the most important, although general , goals are
to provide a safe environment for citizens and to
improve interpersonal coaununications and understanding
Letter to Harvey Hurlbert
' ' November 27 , 1974
, Page 3
between the deputies and citizens.
7 . The deputies will contact each and every resident
and commie-2rcia1 establis1ment and offer a security
inspection to suggest methods that can be used to
better protect themselves from theft or burglary.
B . In addition to the men specifically assigned to the
Cities , they have behind them many advantages of our
large de,-)_irtm,ont. ! e operate a complete records system
second Co Tone, ccn.--i,unlcatlon systelm, laboratory,
jail , civil, training and specialized investigational
details.
Please contact me if you desire any additional information.
Sincer.e';y,
BEN CLARK, SHERIFF
BC/r
1 Earl P.Wilsey(1892-1957)
1631 HUNTINGTON DRIVE • P.O. BOX 430• SOUTH PASADENA,CALIF. 91030 •Telephone (213) 799-9181 • Cable "WHINT"
December 2, 1974
2-2189-0103
Mr. Paul Williams
Director of Planning
City of Palm Desert
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane
Palm Desert, California 92260
Dear Paul :
have just met with Mr. Charles G. Taylor regarding his property which is
noted on the attached xerox map.
The General Plan as now recommended indicates this area as open space --
more specifically a park and wildlife preserve. The rationale for this was
twofold -- first preservation of the hillside areas which will be viewed by
residents of Palm Desert and secondly the CAC request for a park in this
vicinity -- as indicated on one of the drawings you brought to South Pasadena.
Mr. Taylor has pointed out to me his plans to use this property as income for
his retirement years. I have informed him of the hearingson December 9 and 19.
In reviewing the property I believe it could be shown as very low density --
1 to 3 per acre -- inasmuch as the range of slopes within Mr. Taylor's property
is similar to portions of the Cahiulla Hills areas which is also shown as
very low density -- 1 to 3 per acre. Perhaps, in this context, the development
of the site as a residential planned unit development subject to provisions
of the grading and zoning ordinances might be acceptable to the City. Also,
since the CAC map showed the park as somewhat. of a "blob," it might be
reasonable to consider limiting the park to south of the area noted as
"County Park" on the attached map.
If, after review of these factors, you believe the land use designation should
be changed, please make such a recommendation in the staff comments to be
submitted at the hearings and, if approved, we will change the land use map.
planning • engineering • architecture landscape architecture surveying • mapping • systems
'Mr. Paul Williams -2- December 2, 1974
Thank you for your considerafiion of this matter.
Sincerely,
WILSEY & HAM
Larry . Morrison, A IA, AIP
Program Director
LBM:kp
Attachment
cc: Mr. Charles G. Taylor
Mr. Hunter T. Cook
t
t
1
1
J
S StA- ALLS------OR—
toll
- 0
s s DESERT OR R- ( y
O z
_ 0
IL
N � �
7 >
RANCHO RO 2 > N
' -7!On
fm
R-3• � °�-6ARBAR4—DR o7000
7000 a t
PA.K t �r
^ P
V � 00 R-2 P- 1 N 00
a:. Ct(OLLQD MIMOSA OP a
N R-3- P o
W-� r7o �I M �zs'R'2
CACTUS S, . 7000 R-�
n DR �$ . ARBOLEDA
Im , BRUSmwoo N
Rz R• 1 o
I� C-P-S C"P•S5i t p p GLORIANA
s
R 2-
a7o �i C 7 NTA
/ A SONORA DR N R•2-
7000
NIC
SAN-
• i� `� R 2-
SIERRA.-VISTA RD R•/ 7000ATALINA
N R-2-5000 R-2 :o
�- TAM>'tC0 OR. R-2 R•2 E� GUADALUf
RANCHO GRANDE 0
R-2-7000 = _ <�
r s
w N
av R-1
c2 p-Ss ,
i000 R•I
o '" f
c-P-s
cR C - P_S
w-2 � P
ems
R-2-6000
M&.TAV64M r
�� ATAMq v M n
t• Tq._ Jr � � b
\`..\ `
k4vfRTA1L l
9
ly `
ze N M
3�m R-2- o
r
N a �o CIiARLES C. TAYLOR
" INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES
SALES-LEASES -INVESTIENTS
1 _,. _,__^,- \Ll)ICSIIC R:?iV:l'1• CO., 0292 E.TELEGRAPII ROAD
LOS ANGELES,GALIFORNIA 00040
j (213)685-5380
I
PA CI FI c Rim
t� ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD.
COMMUNITY PLANNERS-DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
73-893 HIGHWAY 111
i, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
"" (714 j 346-6041
December 4, 1974
Mr. Paul Williams, Director of
Environmental Services
CITY OF PALM DESERT
45-275 Prickly Pear Square
Palm Desert, California 92260
Subject: Palm Desert General Plan
Our File No. 73-05101
Dear Mr. Williams:
Silver Spur Associates, developer of the Ironwood Country Club project ,
has requested this office to review the public hearing draft of the
Palm Desert General Plan dated November 12, 1974, and to discuss with
your staff areas of concern that Silver Spur Associates has with certain
sections of the General Plan document as they relate to the Ironwood
project in general and to their vested interests in the Conditional Use
Permit under which the project is being developed. It is noted that
many millions of dollars have been expended toward the development of this
project to date, estimated to be in excess of twenty percent of the ult-
imate project value.
The purpose of this letter is to outline the various concerns of the
developer that we have discussed on several occasions since the draft of the
General Plan was issued on November 12, 1974, and to make specific requests
for revisions or additions to the General Plan document. Specific concerns
and requests on specific pages of the document follow.
PAGE 1 . B.4.a. (Figure 1-3 Land Use)
The Low Density (3-5 DU/Ac) is in conflict with the approved and vested
Conditional Use Permit for the Ironwood project , and as we discussed,
should be revised in Neighborhood No. 7 to Medium Density (5-7 DU/Ac) ,
similar to the neighborhood north of Haystack Road.
The Very Low Density ( 1-3 DU/Ac) is also in drastic conflict with the
approved Conditional Use Permit and existing development and should be
revised to Medium Density designation.
The City and Valley-Wide Trails through the Ironwood project and the
Living Desert Reserve are in conflict with the existing improvements
and desires of the developers of both the Living Desert Reserve and the
Ironwood project. The Ironwood project has prior to this time con-
structed golf course-related facilities in the area designated as City
Page 2
s
Wide Trails. Such improvements include a golf clubhouse and attendant
parking lots and appurtenances, 18-Hole Championship golf course, 9-Hole
3 Par golf course, 4 Holes in .the resort length golf course, driving
range facilities, golf course maintenance building and facilities, irrig-
ation lakes and appurtenances, and the like. Future construction in this
area will include completion of the resort golf course west and southwest
of the existing golf clubhouse facility and along the Dead Indian Creek
storm channel , an additional 18-Hole Championship golf course west and
southwest of the existing clubhouse facility, and residential dwelling
units immediately west of and adjacent to all golf course and related
facilities. These existing and proposed improvements (specified by the
Conditional Use Permit) will completely develop this area in question,
and will not permit the installation of bicycle, equestrian , or hiking
trails which could create a gross conflict in uses. In addition to this ,
we understand that the Living Desert Reserve does not desire to have either
equestrian or hiking facilities to or through their project separate from
the interior nature trails that presently exist. It is for these reasons
that Silver Spur Associates requests that the equestrian/hiking trails
be deleted east of the equestrian center near Highway 74, and that the
proposed bicycle/golf cart trail be realigned to follow the alignment of
Portola Avenue along its entire length westerly to Highway 74, if the city
desires to have bicycle trails in this section of the city. It is noted
that the natural slope of the land at the southern edge of the city is steep
(4%-5%) , and that bicycle trails must be hard surfaced with asphalt , concrete,
or other suitable materials, making flood control channels highly impract-
icable for bicycle uses.
It is noted that a convenience commercial facility is located at the south-
east corner of Highway 74 at Portola Avenue, and that the text on Page 1 . B.5
indicates a location at the northeast corner of Highway 74 at Haystack Road,
which is not shown on the Land Use Map. You indicated the location at Por-
tola Avenue is correct, and that the text on Page 1 .B.5 should be revised to
indicate this location.
You indicated in our discussions that a "private recreational use" designation
was to be added to the land use designations on the Land Use Map, and that
this designation -should be applied to all of the area of the Ironwood project
containing or proposed to contain golf course separate from residential
areas. It is noted that these areas are presently designated "Wildlife
Preserve" and that this inappropriate designation should be revised to indicate
private recreational use.
PAGE 2.G. l .a (Figure 1 .2 Urban Design Abstract)
The hillside and wildlife preserve and the central loop of trail systems
are discussed in the preceeding paragraphs. The developer requests that
this figure be revised to indicate a relocated trail system along the align-
ment of Portola Avenue to Highway 74, and that the hillside and wildlife
preserve designation be revised to private recreational use designation in
the golf course areas of the Ironwood project.
PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 73-893 HIGHWAY 111 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
page 3
PAGE 3.B. 6
It is noted that a convenience commercial center is indicated on several
exhibits within the General Flan at the southeast corner of Highway 74 at
Portola Avenue. The devloper neither proposes nor opposes the commercial
site at this location. However, the discussion on this page does not spec-
ify the acreage of the convenience commercial center at this location, but
does specify a general rule-of-thumb requirement of 1 .4 acres per 1 ,000
population. A projected population of 4,200 may be deduced from the required
community and neighborhood park acreages shown on Page 7.P.2.a. for Neighbor-
hood No. 7, but it is quite possible the center will serve more than this
single neighborhood. As the Ironwood project is approximately two years old,
considerable "offsite" improvements have been constructed in addition to
residential dwelling units, and as the cost of all such existing and future
improvements must be based on an ultimate number of dwelling units, the
developer requests that a specific area be assigned to this convenience
commercial center so that the project may continue in an orderly fashion.
PAGE 4. B. l .b.
The developer notes that the statistics quoted for the Ironwood Country Club
are not accurate, and should be 146 dwelling units completed, 74 dwelling units
under construction, 2946 additional units planned, and 2716 total dwelling
units (per Conditional Use Permit) . The developer requests that these stat-
istice be revised to the numbers quoted above.
PAGE 4. B.3.a.
The developer notes that the projected residential development for Neighbor-
hood No. 7, of which Ironwood project is a part, indicate 1538 dwelling units
to be constructed, and 3837 population in that neighborhood. As the Ironwood
project has 2496 additional units planned as described above, and adjacent pro-
perties are planned for 327 units per a valid Conditional Use Permit issued
to Mercury Enterprises, a minimum projection" of 3043 additional dwelling units
may be expected in this neighborhood plus dwelling units to be constructed
on other vacant land in Neighborhood No. 7. For these reasons , the developer
requests that the statistics for Neighborhood No. 7 be reviewed and revised
to more reasonably reflect projected developments. in this neighborhood, inclu-
ding the two approved projects described above.
PAGE 5.P.l .a. (Figure 5. 1 Highway Network)
The developer notes that the alignment of Portola Avenue is not correct and
should be revised per the location shown on the Land Use Map and other exhib-
its within the General Plan.
PAGE 5.P. l .b (Figure 5.2)
It is noted that with the exception of the secondary highway, the specific
dimensions indicated on this page are either in conflict with the existing
county standards or are algebraically inconsistent within themselves. The
developer notes that approximately 4,000 lineal feet of Portola Avenue has
been constructed within a 100 right-of-way per County Standards, which in-
dicate a 12' parkway between the right-of-way and the curb line on each side
PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 73-893 HIGHWAY III PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
,ne
Page 4
of the street. The devloper requests that either this page or an item in the
text provide for the continuation of the existing improvement standards in
' this case, as revision to the dimensions shown on this page would be highly
impractical , aesthetically detracting, potentially dangerous from a safety
point of view, etc. .
PAGE 5.P. l .c (Figure 5-3)
As described above under Land Use Map, the developer requests that the city-
wide bicycle/golf cart trail shown on this map be relocated along Portola
Avenue, and that the city-wide hiking/equestrian trails shown on this map
be deleted from the equestrian center near the existing southerly city limit
line easterly through the Ironwood project and the Living Desert Reserve.
PAGE 6.4.a.4.a (Figure 6.4-3)
As described in preceeding discussion, the developer requests that the golf
course area of the Ironwood project be removed from the hillside and wildlife
preserve designation, and be place in a private recreational use designation .
It is noted that Figure 6.4-1 correctly excludes these golf course areas from
the hillside or mountain designation.
PAGE 7.P.2.et seq.
The developer is very concerned with the implementation policies of the rec-
reation element on this and succeeding pages, in that they do not appear to
provide for planned residential developments which include extensive recreation-
al facilities for their residents in general . Specifically in the case of the
Ironwood project, this project includes some 1150 acres in golf course develop-
ment and approximately 20 tennis courts and related activity facilities for the
common benefit and use of all residents within the project , which ultimately
will contain as many as 2716 separate dwelling units. , In addition to these
common facilities, there are numerous local recreational facilities for each
increment of up to 20 dwelling units. These facilities include such items as
regular sized swimming pools, therapy pools, outdoor barbeque faclities , out-
door ice machines, sinks, etc. , outdoor shade structures and furniture, irrig-
ation and lighting -systems, and the like. These two levels of recreational
facilities are judged to more than adequately meet the general needs of the
project residents , creating very little or no demand for formal "neighborhood"
or "community" parks with the rather deatiled variety of facilities specified
in this section. It is worth note that a canvass of the existing residents
within the Ironwood project indicates that there is an average of 0. 13 school -
age children per dwelling unit among the existing residents , and that there are
no school-age children attending local schools within the project. The developer
therefore requests that some language be provided in this section of the General
Plan document to provide for adaptation of planned residential developments such
as and including the Ironwood project, which provide specific recrational fac-
ilities designed to meet the specific needs of the residents within the project .
The developer also requests that the city re-evaluate its projected need for
a significant community park containing 8.4 acres in the Neighborhood No. 7,
in the light of the age and recreation requirements of the existing and future
residents within this area. It is noted that existing developments within
Neighborhood No. 7 include two very large mobile home parks catering primarily
PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 73-893 HIGHWAY 111 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
Page 5
to childless or retired couples, at least 5 planned residential developments
including significant self-contained recrational facilities, and a large
number of relatively expensive single family homes selling in excess of
$ 40,000, which in many cases contain their own swimming pools and house
adults without school -age children. It is noted that a recreational facility
within the Silver Spur Ranch development was abandoned and removed in the past
due to lack of use and support by the residents within the development,
indicating less than an acute demand for common recreational facilities in
this neighborhood.
The developer would sincerely appreciate your reviewing his requests as described
aboce relative to the proposed General Plan document, and to incorporate changes
with which you agree in your staff report to be submitted to the Planning Commiss-
ion and City Council . Representatives of the developer and this office are avail -
able on short notice to further discuss the items described above with you znd
your staff at your convenience.
Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
PACIFIC RIM
D.H. Shayler
DHS/rs
Approved for Submittal
SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES
By IRONWOOD CORPORATION, Managing Partner
By __(i V1 ,
I ]:!
Vice-President
PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 73-893 HIGHWAY 111 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
PA-1,1\11 I?ESERT PROPERTY OWNJ_,'RS_, ASSOCIATION
1 .0. BOX 1244 PAIAI I)ESL'RT, CA1,11ORNIA 92260
Trmnpnoun (714) 346-2304
A Non-Profit Corporation
December 5 , 197i;
Pal" Desprz Atv
City cannri''!
45-275 Prickiv Pi ar Lan-
Palm DeFort , California 022F,',
Gentlemon :
The are: a' Directory cf t5p Palm hasert Drover' %ners AFsoci.
ation at a crecial meptinn ho! A 4-AnesdAv , Pecemher 4 , 197:;
adopted the QliowQ7 resolution .
RESOLUTICN : A large majority of the residents of Palm Desert ,
personally and/or, thrcu7n thoso nle o represont them at
public hears n -s , advised Wi!sQy and Han , consultants for the Wtv
of Fa Les-rr , that 1sy dnFir-Q to "Tocnarve the rssonrial ,
resisential chmracter of the Citv" witk low densitv and controliec!
heipht 5oth resitenti-O ant commorcial . it was their dpsire to
retain t e same atmosphare that has main Palm D2snrt Tamous .
'We thereforn 7ro=2 a resolution to adom the Seneral Plan as
7ralarol by A!7 �- ant Fim wilt On foKowin- chan-q ; .
1 . Remove 'ro7 the Con7ulta.mot n r- nort and mans all referQnac 07
Palm 5asern hncoAnr tho Morming C-ntyr" for thn entire
Valley in thn present incornorated area of Palm Desert .
2 . Remove all reference in map-, and renLrts , in the nresent in-
corrorataA area oV Palm 7csor: . For 7alm Desym to bccom,�
the central tourist area for the entire VaIlP7 with larve
convention tv-P hateiz .
3 . in the Present incarncratpC drin of Palm Desert remove from
tho renbr! all "UA Qnsity ( 7 to 12 to the acro) " and,
"Nodium ronAtv ( 5 tc 7 no the acro) " luavinr the maximum
density to 3 to 5 to the Para nay dnacribed in 14-, rapor? as
"Low Dens itv- .
4 . Set hei7ht Mmits = rnsidvriial units to a raximuD of 15
feet and on commercial units to a mania. um of 24 feet .
5 . Chan7n all Classification anV 7=07 in the Consultants maDs
and plans for th2 fuzure of Palm Denert to conform to the
above .
Very trulv .
Barbara FemolA (Mrs . )
Administrahvi Secretary
PAS INI DESERT PROPERTY' OVINERS ASSOCIAINON
P.Q. BOX 1244 PALM CALIF-ORNIA 922610
04
TriLiu,Horm (7 4) 3-,' 20
A Non-Profit Carp,.rati,n
Pecember 18 , 1974
lionorablc- 1"'lavor and
1,,lembers of the City Council
Cit"', 11--'.1
Palm Desert , Ca 922,,)0
Re of the councii's dociL,"_I_0n on 1�ecr,mber 12 , 1914 to
pay Ililsev and Ham an a�-,dit--I-unal '31 , 300 . 00 for Improvement
District
Gentlemen
This letter is a protest as well as an appeal and a reruest
that the Droncsed contract not he entered into with Willsej), and
ilam for pa-.rTnno nt- of an a,_Idi�!
' -onal 11351 , 30G - JO for improvement
District Y 1 , for the 5ollc%,,in,7 reasonr, :
1. This plan does not havo th,- ai)pro-val_ of the palm Desert
Property 0-vjn��rs issociation Architectural Committee which
has jurisdictionover a major nortlon of this area , nor has
the Irit(-r4p Core Area Iraff .-I.c Committee appointed I_)V the
City to stu.,Iv the plan completed their study or reached a
decision to annrove or, not to approve . Gqitjjout this approval ,
anc_], a rublic hearin,.7, on sarr�y , we challenR�_ the.. le7alitv of
the Council�S 6-c,,ision to approve' a contract of this dollar
amount and especially when the Ir).T)rov(?m,,--,iL ")istrict Plan
could have such severc= and long lasting effects on all Palm
Desert .
2 . Several narts of the plan are very controversial and have
been challenged by the very peo,,-)le it was created to serve .
3 . Certainly a plan of this ma-inituOe deserves Separate and
I=U11 -.-,,.:,,-jjc4t%, in iavmans lan�-ua7e , so the Citi-ens may
be proDerlv advised and therefore a')lc to intelligently
make their wishes !Mo,.,7n t-o the Citv .
4. The plan as proposed , could have serious adverse effects
on the vaiu.�- ' benefiting
! of some parcels of pronerty while bener
others . This could invite costly Lawsuits for the City .
5 . The "Clifford lllen:Ierson" proposal for traffic in the Core
area of ?a2r--L I-)eser-1 , too-ether with the possibility of major
financinn. '--v the State oIL California , has not been thoroughly
invest iq.a ted, by the City tc-Te-ther with I-III. Henderson and
all other participants 'who could h-111F) 10 obtain approval
,by the State . if State financin7 can be obtained it would
save the City '`1-
Il "ITI ousCS- of e7l,ollars and r)rovi(-Ie a solution
L
Ism
I)eaert Iropeky Ownvrff Ataoc;atitizy.
Poqe 2
to our futurc trafFic nrnklams alonn Hiqhway ill and thc,
frontave roads .
6 . Before adoption oF any plan , nf this importance a separate
Environmental impact RnDort should he prepared and submitted
for appr3val .
The City Council is respectTul1v requested not to enter
into a Contract with Wilsey and Ham for improvement District 11
until the suggestions contained herein have been complied with .
At this tKe a full disclosure of the payments made to
Wilse.v and Ham for each part of their service to the City of
Palm Desert , that has been completed , or contracted to be com-
pletod in the future , should b& Furnishod to the news media
for publication . The public is entitled to this information
and it is long overdue . ,le ask that such a report be prepared
and released immediately with copies sent to the News Media and
to the undersinned.
The preceMnq communication to the Aayor and City Council
of Palm Desert was approved by the Boars of Directors of the
Palm Desert Property Owners Association at a special meetinsT fi
he!& Decemner 17 , 1970 .
Yours truly ,
PALM DESER7 PROPLKIY OWNERS/ASSN.
Barbara Reynolds (Mrs . )
Administrative Secretary
cc : Each Councilmonler
Staff
C _..�_'`��_.i .�'_""_'t �`'_..�w,..__"....i,.• ,x.:¢u�..,u,c4L'......_.uc,.�n:.^mcu...i...i.y:.:i`+.-�'.r
45.275 Prickly Pear Lane P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Ph. 346-0611
December 9, 1974
Mr, Harvey Hurlburt, City Manager
City of Palen Desert
Palen Desert, California 92260
Dear Mr. Hurlburt:
This is to inform the City Council and the Planning Commission that
Mr. Lyman Martin presented the attached resolution for adoption by
CAC on December 5, 1974. The vote was as follows:
FOR: Gorman, L. Martin, Solis, Peck.
AGAINST: Smith, Richardson, K. Martin, Hirschi, Ricciardi,
Berkey, Mills. ,
Very truly yours,
GEORGE V. BERKEY,
Chairman
i
i
(i
f
1
Z..:'�`..,.✓W..:,.;::-'....,._:_..1...u....f. u...`�". ;�L(_ -:can.u.�.;.:�:II:.::::IfSuiu�mm:mamx>[ld.'�.::Ll�:.u:�
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Ph. 346-0611
December 9, 1974
Mr. Harvey Hurlburt, City Manager
City of Palm Desert
Palm Desert, California 92260
Dear Mr. Hurlburt:
The Citizens Advisory Committee has concluded its studies of the proposed
Palm Desert General Plan. Please inform the City Council and the Planning
Commission that by majority vote, CAC recommends adoption of the Public
Hearing Draft, November 12, 1974, with the following changes:
1. LAND USE
Map (page 1. B. 4, a. ): Change specialty commercial on north side of
Whitewater Channel at Washington Street to low density residential. Delete
reference to 118. 5 acres of industrial area on Page 1. B. 7.
2. URBAN DESIGN
On Page 2. P. 1, change last paragraph to read "utilize indigenous plants in
landscaping whenever appropriate". On next to last paragraph add "public
and private parking lots" after "pedstrian areas":
5. CIRCULATION
E
On Highway Network Map, figure 5. 1, make corrections to truly show
exidting portions of Monterey and Cook Streets.
6. ENVIRON-ATF'NTAL
On Page 6. 1. P. 1. delete last paragraph.
r
Very truly yours,
GEORGE V. BERKEY
Chairman
T0:
Citizens Advisory Committee
Paler Desert Planning Commission
Palm Desert City Council.
The Environmental Impact Report is one of the most fundamental and
important parts of any General Plan . It becomes increasingly im-
portant when substantial changes in the density and/or the L age
and character of a community is also a part of the General Plan .
The General Plan submitted by Wilsey & Ham for the present Incorpora-
ted Area of l'al1 n Desert admittedly contains such substantial anc
controversial. changes ,See Page E10 & Ell, etc . of report) . Among
other_ things the image , character and environment is substantially
changed by including in the wording, maps and plans of the proposed
General. flan "Shopping Areas for the entire Valley" ; "Convent-ion
type Hotels to serve the entire Valley" and by increasing the Den-
sity by the inclusion of classifications of "High Density" (7 to 18
to the acre) and "Medium Density" (5 to 7 to the acre) . It is the
opinion of many people that unless these substantial changes are
removed from the General Plan, in the present Incorporated area of
Palm Desert , that the Environmental Impact Report will not withstand
future attack by developers , land. owners or other groups seeking
changes or relief. future Environmental reports filed by developers
will undoubtedly be based on the General Flan and it is therefore of
utmost importance that the Environmental Impact report withstand any
attack.
The substantial changes referred to herein will have far greater
adverse effects on the environment than is contemplated in the Wilsey
and Ham report . The report is based on out of date data and con-
tingencies and suppositions based on this data on which many well
know authorities disagree .
1 . Example - (Page E5a) - "Air Monitoring Data for 1970" . The rapid
development which has occurred since 1970 has made a tremendous
change in the base figures and therefore any future forecast now --
based on these old 1970 figures - is not factual. No less than
Dr. James Pitt, head of the air pollution for the State of Cali-
fornia , has repeatedly stated that as the density of population
increases the rate of air pollution increases , eometrically. The
adverse effect has been understated in the report.
Z. The adverse effect caused by the suggested changes in the very
character and image of Palm Desert, as well as the increase in
density, will have far greater adverse effect on all types of
pollution than stated in the Environmental Impact Report .
A- Water . Experts disagree with the future availability of the
quanity and quality.
B- .(Page E10) Climate. The report admits increased humidity and
detrimental effects on residents . Increased humidity multi-
plies rapidly with increased density and therefore density
should be kept to a minimum.
- L
C- The report states (on E10 - Bl) "The Social changes will
doubtlessly be vi_ei,7ed as detrimental." and "The Primary goal
is to create an organized environment of different family
types" . ~Why make organized changes in an environment that has
made Palm Desert Famous? This is not in accord with input
from residents .
D. The report states (Page E10 & 11 under 2) "Marked changes
will occur in property values" . It is true Lhat increased
density classifications in the land use will start a cycle of
increased property values which feeds on itself requiring
higher and higher density to support the ever increasing price
of property. Finally the bubble breaks and everyone but th.e
promoter loses . On the other hand low density controls prop-
erty prices so that each piece of property may be developed
so that it is compatible with the adjacent property and to the
advantage of all Palm Desert .
E . Other adverse environmental effects will occur on every en-
virorimental factor including solid waste, noise, light pol-
lution, etc . etc .
When adapted the General Plan and its Environmental Impact Report
will give the present and future City Councils the authority as well
as the mandate to enforce the General Plan in the future development
of Palm Desert. It is important therefore that the proposed General
Plan be changed to eliminate any substantial changes in the image
and character of Palm Desert and reduce the density to a maximum of
S to the acre . Without these changes the Environmental Impact I:cport
is not factual and is based on suppositions and opinions which can
not be supported.
- T
,,NT Op IN REPLY REFER TO
o; m, United States Department of the Interior 791 (r 1 )
'o
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
a Riverside District
1414 University Ave . , Rm. 101
Riverside, CA 92507
• NO 2 ° i374
Department of Environmental Services
Planning Division
P. 0 . Box 1648
Palm Desert , CA 92260
Dear Sir:
We have looked over the Public Hearing Draft of the Palm Desert General
Plan .
We would like to compliment those responsible for a job well done .
The Goals and Objections are very good throughout and the Implementation
Policies are proper to bring about those goals .
We were especially interested in the Land Use Element since BLM has over
10,000 acres or land within the Palm Desert influence Area .
We note that the map entitled "Local Context" on page i .l .b shows an area
designated "Area of University Leaseholds". This area contains over 8000
acres of BLM lands which is more property labeled BLM-UCR Cooperative
Research Area - as shown in the Land Use Map on page 1 .B .4a .
The Land Use Map also has an inaccuracy in the legend where it indicates
the Deep Canyon Research Center as UCR (Fee Title) . Some of this area was
acquired from BLM and is less than Fee Title - i .e , it has been granted
to U .C.R. with a reversionary clause which says it will return to BLM
if it is not used for specific Recreation or Public Purposes identified in
the Patent .
The Desert Slender Salamander mentioned on page 6.4 .B .2 is on both federal
and state endangered species lists. The habitat for this species , located
in Hidden Palm Canyon , has been purchased by California Department of Fish
and Game..
r cerely y rs ,
Delmar D. Vail
District Manager
r--.
'` G9UF1Tr '
ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY
' DISTRIGt
COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
POST OFFICE BOX 1058 - COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 - TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651
DIRECTORS OFFICERS
LE ON KENNEDY, PRESIDENT LOWELL O.WEEKS,GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER
RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS,VICE-PRESDENT OLE J. NORDLAND, SECRETARY
GEORGE H. LEACH WALTER R. WRIGHT, AUDITOR
C. J. FROST REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEYS
WILLIAM B. GARDNER
3 December 1974
File: 1150.
Department of Environmental Services
Planning Division
City of Palm Desert
P. 0. Box 1648
Palm Desert, California 92260
Re: Palm Desert General Plan
Gentlemen:
Here are our recom.-nendations and comments:
1. Acknowledgements Page - Change "Coachella Valley Water
District" to "Coachella Valley County Water District"
2. Page 1.B.4.a
a. The Palm Desert Wastewater Reclamation Plant includes
more land than is shown - see attached drawing.
b. The Palm Valley Stormwater Channel, west of Highway
74, is not plotted correctly at its most southerly
location - see attached drawing number 1681.
3. Page 7.B.1•, Water
a. Water is also supplied by the Palm Desert Community
Services District
b. The information in the second paragraph is incorrect
and incomplete - see attached material marked Attachment
A.
4. Page 7.B.1, Sewage System - add this sentence: "Regional
wastewater collection lines have been installed to serve
the city."
5. Page 7.P.6, in last line, change "FINE" to "FIRE".
6. Page 7.P.7, the first paragraph states: "Require the
CVCWD to meet all code regulations regarding water
pressure requirements for domestic use and fire protection."
y
Department of Environmental Services 3 December 1974
Page 2 1150.
We do not understand the •implication or meaning of this
statement.
7. Page 7.P.7, Drainage System, please refer to "Report on
Comprehensive Plan for Surface Water Drainage for the
Palm Desert Area", prepared by the CVCWD in 1966. A
discussion of this could be included on page 7.B.1.
8. Page E.12c, Figure 9-4, water and sewer data are not correct.
We offer this data:
People
Residential DU (1) Water (2) Sewage (3)
Very low density 2.6 700 340
Low density 2.6 700 340
Medium density 2.6 700 340
High density 1.9 510 250
1) Figure 4-5, page 4.B.2.b
2) Based on 270 gpcd, Table IV-1 Riverside County Comprehensive
Water and Sewerage Plan, December 1972
3) Based on 130 gpcd, Table IV-2 Riverside County Comprehensive
Water and Sewerage Plan, December 1972
Proposed Industrial water and wastewater flows are too large for
the type of development that would be compatable with Palm
D-,sert.
9. Page i.2, in two places dates are shown as 1974, should they
read 1973.
10. Page 1.B.2,• paragraph 1. , line 6, an area of 102.2 acres is
shown, this should be of the magnitude of 1022 if the 18.1
percent of the total area is correct.
If you wish to discuss these items further please call one of these persons:
Stormwater & Drainage - D. L. Chaudoin
Water & Sewage - Tom Levy
Very duly; curs, r
William H. ,ongenecker, Jr.
Deputy Chime Engineer
WHL:mak
Enclosures/3
as.
• PA4M DESERT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
P.O. BOX 1244 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TEuipnotma (714) 34&2844
A Non-Fr&fit r3cTporation
December 5 , 197:4
Palm Desert City Ccuncil,
45-275 Prickly Ppar
Palm Desert , Sa 922V;
qentlemen :
The board oF Directors cc Ahn Pulm BOsOru 'rOP-M Pwrerr Associ-
ation at a snecial mawtin7 hold Decemhar 4 , 1974 adopted the
follcwing resolution .
The Environmenta2 impact Report is one of thn moM fundamental and
important parts of any nenaral Plan . It beccmev incrnasin7ly im-
nortant when substantial chanoys in the density and/or the imape
and character cf a community is also a Part of the Kneral Plan .
The General Plan submitted by Wilsev and Ham For the present in-
cornorared Aroa of Palm Vasart admittedly c'-.Dnt,:,ains
MO and Ell , etc . of report) .
Amcn7 other tlinvs the ima7e , character and environment is sub-
tat can7d cl t c d n mas n r'�snialNh byinuAQ7 in h dinqao pad1a
of the nroposed Ceneral Plan such phrases as "ShappinF Areas for
the entire- Vallev" ; "Convention rvne Hotnis to serve the entire
Vallev" and ov increasing the Denaltv by the inclusion of Classi-
fications of "Ainh Density" ( , to 1E to the acre ) aid Medium
Density" ( 5 -o 7 to the acre ) , It is the Opinion Cif many peopi.,
that unless rhese suhslantial chan7es are removed from the 7eneral
Man , in the 7rasnnr TnccrnorataC area of Palm Desert , that the
Environmental lm?act Report will not faith tan! future attack by
develoners , land owners or othar Proups seekins channes or relief.
Future Environmental reDorts Men by devplonorn will undoubted1j,
be based on thQ Ceneral an and it is therefore of utmost Wor-
tance that the Enviienmenta impact report withstand anV such attack.
The substantial chanqes raferred to herein will have far vreater
adverse effects on the environment than is contemplated in the
Wilsev 9 Ham renort . The report is hased on out of date data and
contin7encies and suDposi .ions based on this data on which many
well known authcrities disagree .
1 . Example - (PaFe E50 - VAir Xonitorin7 Data for 1970" . The
raDid develorment which has occurred since 1970 has made a
tremendous chan7e in the base fi7urns and therefor any future
forecast now based on these old 1970 fiqures is not factual.
Dr. james Pitt head of the air nolluKon for the State of
California, has repeatedly stated that an the density of
PaQe 2
pAhlation incrypern the rat- n' Or vollurf-n incroasos Mnr-tr i-
calIv, V�a odver-- " FT('aL has Loan
2 . Thn n !vnrye - 'act cauand U7 thn sqYFo7TnQ chan7ys in the ver7
charactcr an n7o �T Palm : elnr�, an well as No 02r-asn in
density , wili � iv� fn - rnn : n viv !rcc 07nct on all tv7ps 0c
plallaoico than a7 ;- ! in Re 7nvir7nvnntaI 1mrac7 ort .
A. yltpr . Tx-4nl� disin -n wilh the 'uture availaKITty of
t 1., .
14 A V LS FncrvA�
dopsikv and t�nrp-
fore
C. 7he rovert Ftaips Or 710 -RI ) "7Ke Social chan7as will
douhtlessin �n viewed as deLrimental and "The Primary 7oal
is to crecto an crvnni7pt anvirnrnanY PF diffor?nt Vamilv tyn-s " .
changps to the ideal WARRITA that has
mady Fain Zas2o - 7amcus ? VhIs to not in accord with innut frn:-
residents on wh: ch rne Environmanual imnact FeDurt is purportedly
haspn .
D. The reporL ntares ( Di7a Ell S 12 undar 2 ) "Kar?e ? chan7e-,
will cccur in rro7wrtv VOU27" . TL is true thaL increasn..
densiiv in the lapd use will qcart a cyoln a--
increainl nricnarov values which fnednea itself rcouiring hl7ho.'-
and hicher �on� ir- to su5uon tAn "vqr incroaning nrica of
properrv. Finnily the tihnin hreakq in! avervcne hut the nrc-
moter loses . in thn ottar hand 1cw d�n3lty rontrols nrc7crt,,'
nricos no that each niecv of property mau be developed so that
it is conDptQla witn 7he adjacanc property and to the advanta7,-.
of all Paim �- sart .
E . Othqr atv= n environ7anta? n5fccn will occur an evsry
environmental Factor inciudir7 3olid waste , noiEc , 47ht rollu
Lion , etc . , TOC.
When adantea th" :anera 1 Plan unK its nvironmnntal imnact Resort
will jive the nreinn and future City Councils the authority as weK
as the manean tc ;an vorcq the Teneral Plan in the future develonmon''
of Falm Resrr7 . it i: imporvanz iher . for- that thn nroposed 7-nerall
Plan he chan7ed to eliminato any substantial chan7es in the imaw
and characlor of -aim ?as-nz an! rn�u7n thn Unqltv to a maximum ct
5 tc the acre . �ithout those chan7a3 the Tnvironmcntai im7oct Re7rr��
is not factual 2nt is based on sunpositiong and ooinions which cai-i.
not be supportod .
Very truiv ,
Barbara RevnolOs (Mrs . )
Administrative Secretary
PALM DESERT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
P.6 BOX 1244 PALM I)ES[.,',R1', CALIFORNIA 92260
TELnraoi,m (714) 34&21054
A Non-Profit Corporation
Decemier 5 , 1974
Palm Desert City Council
45-275 Prichiv Ynar Lnn,,
Palm Desert . California 12260
Gentlemen :
The Board of Directors of the Palm Desert Property Owners
Associaticn Qt a sDecial meeting December 4 , 1974 adopted
the following resolution .
RESOLUTION : Withhold anv expenditure of money for chanties
of Fiqhway 111 , El Faveo an! the 40= AND SOUTH Franta.7«
Roals for a minimum of 90 days to allow for further study of
the "Cliff Henderson" proposal and the possible financin; of
it . We recommend the City and Yr. Henderson wo.,--,,'-, to�-,,ether
on this proincz as Cme is of the essence . Mr. Eenterson ,
The City Council and Staff , should pool their findings be-
cause without City backing , no indiviVual plan would get off
the ground.
Very truly ,
PALM DESERT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATIO.'.,
Barbara Reynolds (Mrs . )
Administrative Secretary
.. i"i Sit'• i-.
Y(/ 12Xai(JLUT.ION
A large majority of the lZeijiftr:ts of P:',Tt? Pc-sert, pr..`.r`.iofi7all ;an,,,/or
thru those electe.? to represent thcm at public henrinr s,
VUIC-ey S Vnm, consultants for tube City of: P.-lm ._ ; Frt, that t�:=e�,r
tie,C,i_rE d to t3Frecorvo tic cssc,nt.lal, 7'a?`, 4:�I1t�A1. ch^racter of the
City t.i v i low eensi.ty controlled rolled moth resit+enti-al. and
cc: W113r_caa'1. It Vas thck cos:irc to ret iiw the sawe atmosphere that
has made P!-tlm Dese-_rt famous .
We therefor propane a rc:;o ut on to idopt: the Gcneral Plan as pre-
pared iry l?D.Sey and is ra with tx.e: -,.oIlo-•,ing changes .
Rf-wS`t01ve �rcm the C,,)ii3u i.t:ai)t,, Y"-i3ort Mc! T-_-IDs reference to
Palm D oor.t beccming the "Shopping; Conger" for the entire W-iley
j in t .E3 present Incorporated area of l:''i.Rin L'ccsert.
2. Pie _�.ove all reference in maps and reports, in the present
Ir.-- tied Area. of PaLn Desert, for P-iha Desert to Lccomc the
central.. toirist arc a for the entire Valley with large conven-
ticn ftyTie hotels.
3. In the present lncorPo.,.ateO area of Iglu Desert r_cmove l:r o-nq
t►3 repo.'.tall
lDen `J
ssi,i�,ia l e�:s ?.ty 47 to J.} t0 the acre)" i?Tx%' 1°I' :' 1iLC3
sity (5 to ! to4tbe dig,_rc-)" 1_eaving the d nsit7 to
3 to 5 to the acre now eescribed in the repor.4: a ; "Low Density".
4. Set heiglAt limits cn xesi_i enti,al units to z ma.ximun of 15 feet
and on co,:Paiercial ttnirts to a aa;drrun, of 24 feet.
5. ChanCe all classification. any' "onin; in the Consultant:; ra��p s
and pla ns for the future of Palm Desert to conform to the :above.
6. Vithhold any e;Wn; iture of money for changes of Highwa v sl i,
El Pasco and th.e North and South Froutnge Roans for a mivd-",,jm
of 90 61-ys to allow for further rtut.L,, of the "Cliff lic:ne.e:::son"
proposal and the possible financing of it. .
At a Meeting of the Board of Directors of Concerned Citizens of
Palm Desert, on Dec. 3, 1974, unanimously approved the above .
Yours very truly,
CONCERNED CITIZENS OF PALM DESERT
President
Secretary
A WORLDWIDE PUBLIC RELATIONS SERVICE
3325 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, Cali!. 90005 385-9021
Palm Desert , California
December 61 '!;7,-
City Council ,
City of Palm Desert ,
Box 1634 ,
Palm Desert , Calif.
Gentlemen:
I bought property in Pala Desert and settled here for my
permanent ho e-- and persua-ded three fr ends to do likewise ,
because 1 felt the cornaunity had the most charm of any place
in ;Bouthorn Califjrnia.
The developers , running wild for several years , have pretty
well dostro,,70d the charm, out no,.r that we have a municipality
and a :Manning co:lni_ssion it is my hope that so..e of the
origiral charact::r of may be: preserved.
i
Tor;ard that objective i deeply hope your body will restrain
all these a1,bitious citizens , and outsiders , who would madLe
Palm Desert a "thrivin< commercial center" , "hub of the
valley" aril alon` with those ci:amber of commerce slogans
another convention center, God help us.
I do not know if you can contain the "forces of progress" that
will turn alm Desert into another Palm—pri.ngs , or worse--
worse because the plague of locusts has grown worse in recent
years. f
But I pray you will try, recognizing that a great many of us s
worked for cityhood here becau:;e we moped for regulated growth
and a sence of balance in developing the city. k
I trust you will height limit residential buildings to one
story less than 20 feet hi-h, and hold co:;_mercial buildings
to t:•;o stories , under 70 feet at least , or most. '
Also I favor the general concept of restrictin^ residences to
five to the acre ,Qfor _alm Desert. :Uet ' s discourage the ghetto
builders no matter where they code from. /
lJi st lrri,s�,d� > ,
f Bps �.�'. Holloway
,G
73-465 Feather Trail
.YalmDesert , "a, }226a
(Residence)
s
q�.
P.O. Pox 896,
J, , D rtjc7-? -2 P 6 0
CII oil
Do r It
Plannin- Conimission,
City of Dosortq
Palm Desert, Calif. 171,2260.
Gentlemen:
The "Resolution" �-dopted by the Desert
�Iroperty C, o
7!11 rs, -'ls -,oc ion, Concerned Oiti__ons of Pv.lm. Desert,
,and ot!10-rS (,as -ocr Viie att�---.ched tote titer the
cht-n-0-2 --rc,-.Uosted in the E.'rivirorriental Imprct f1e, r po tu (co s',T Iso
'-tt-ched) '7f-IS a- 0 u-
p- proved end -doipitod by the Board f "over. of
Sa,nd & �Shr.dows 1','1
Sand & Shadw-is -,,`1 represent 27 ILqits and
50 people.
The Board of Directors also an-Dointed John B.
y to represert tllr-,-.,-i zi.t all n etin-3 of tI-Ic,, 7-'l'I Dosert
Pl-uinin,-, Coranission tand/or -'U-he Palm Desert City Council.
k'
Gouid Goveri'-01-'s
Enc. 3
BRADLEY A. WALKER
-Flalm Desert �)ecember. 3 , 1974
Chairman
City 1-lanning Co'M,.1:U1:',S101a1
.
i�alw:,)osert , Calif'ornia
Dear sir:
main t-a-in a residence in the upper Alver _'pur ranch
district , ,•:hich i occu-,)y cirht Months out of tile; years.
reside in Connecticut . Illy wijfa and I have been
to _1)al11_,)ese32t for nearlly ton years , and we have enjoyed
the town imi-.ionsely.
.Ijillce most of my friends i have deplorea the unrestricted
t'growth" of -_'Falrii d--,-,e--t5 mushroor-qj-'-!� as it h--,s done the
last few years. I wor"'l-ed for incor-.)or.ation- - because I
wanted to see thecan-br of rampant COLIT',ercialism col ' oi-
led, if indeed any form of is subject to control.
perluaps nothing and no one can stand in the * pa"1h of
to,da,rls bulldozers fueled as they are by the developers '
insatiable ambitions.
But surely some sense can be introduced into the local
h
scene , so-.ie put on the business men w o en-
%rowth,, in way form as long; means more
en-
courage L L- as it
customers, i-iannin-:,.,urely the co:�,i,.aiss_lon stands for
d - �D
intelii nt aavelo-�)r.-ont of LL alai Desert , and will find the
C3
public support to enforce it.
;`e have had too much high density building, of course ,
under the aegis of a distant -,�'=rd of -:-.,u-_,.---visors subject
to in"LIUCnCeS I StronseD2 than the votes of an u1jiLifo-7-mod
citizenry. J*e voters a7--, I,) rather helpless in the face of
7
so-,)histicated ioDbyists et- al, anyilol..I.
Do please hold rosidcntial constrUCtion to si,,.,71e story,
.11
ma:1-ir:,,uhi -perhaos 16 feet , and con:.--ercial of-.ildin--s to
tvjo s*U-ori-_s taller bu1_1 -'1'J_n1,.)-s in this ar 'a wo-a-Ld be a
five houses t
disaster. ��lso , f to the acre , or less , are
4 rUCt4
s U f_-L- Le-_nt for pro-fit'-ble ciinsu Lon .-Thich in
.L
run tijill, pay off in substantial ta:,--es the
citizens i-,ritla a continuing sta'-:3 in the co::1--unity.
sincerely, Bradley ;v.
73.477 FEATHER TRAIL - PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 - PHONE (714) 346.6739
Palm Dcser-fl,-, c-lifornia
Dov.,r,iber
D-irort 1111-lanin.,; Coziirrion
C/(3 I' _LI D,^-ert CjVi .1?11
Fal*a D-�,crt, C-1A,i-fornia.
,o-nc-r-..,i-M7 tlio 1a,_-rj,n7, comj:-i:, un in +,!I-- -"ar futuxo, rs.--!.rdlJ-.-I-; the
Gonoral Pl-. )., ,,I.v v- oL:e i.,;OUJ( lika o :,o- thq iri, 7,o ind
cl-lar.-tat-r of F .Il -J,,"crt af7, it has Ibcoln- in the p'LF;tu; qui0t, ,121-
1 1 u
cro-,,r,-I-d rdnti��! a br_-.-,Ljliful viov, ^ind c1n:7.n -ftir Ilo
brC_A'10.
t! a citizons and prop!-,rtv of-mmrs
Je b,?Iievo a ri,,jori
u ie, _
. . a VMS a (IU2.045�
h o c o h�r e t o 1 iv 3 9 d
rootful vill�igo, pl-xa to rol-Irc,,t fron the llmzrian clensit,yl
noire and "l-rwy tr--fl"ic of 'llio cit,y. ',I*o h-tva loo-u--"it '110"0 H"TIO
into a Convez--�ion City
L�ut not bm_c= o v.,o �,,_I_qtol t-o i.+
or anothor or '.'Ir7�ncjsco, oar
toc-Ot'l-r in Vaoir "I"aickc-'I coon" d!.-110114, 1 * , C,,�I-L7.inly is
ot n of VI.- -vt
b(,IAcV,3 thl sl-iould I-o not r:or" 7,-,i fiva
jjor,,"-. to "Ini-3 !%cro in 0,10 S'orr �:ri`l
u U.1
of f.!._f-',--c,n not
.,or a Ili".n
in loi-:1-It n_nd no-'. .-::or,) tli-.ri 24
many by nj_v,,,>�rour, pron-rty -.r-
3-,.n -ny ot-'i --Oot.-1 clt
Loh r,2 31 11* '0 C?_I.
"I', --n C) Mic ulolls 50 _u L_
our Ct;-.-ulopi,-.:mt can be pro-?s-rly co.,-Iturollodl.
Sincerely and hogofully,
Umo Ee Back
4
72574 lledg,,hog street. Dorothy L. Beck
co - Palm D3s,Irt City Council.
.1ci.-ort 'i minior, Co_':'ilorion
ton`ICri'1 n:
G iC i"ii .1' t!-io 2<J'-__ 7'''_f" C "?'t"" up in th3 n9,ar i,! ..urot r,)
;,= ;v,),-tl '1'.:i, t ",y s,-, S!�.y &t,n Ila 11% to •1l"i
oh'-t ' I,t;'t -r o1 : Z'_1 ?`'if7'.'t `s it 1.1-to I oan i=2 p..`'_9;� . ? � `•i g IZ ."
21ro7,id `.d ro i.'. ":1'e l--'-1 I` ,"a .Atli 'i 1J-� 3.1i g Y:'tal v'i o r ;und Clo wl
br o-i .13 e
1'trz-,) n)Ajority of Vio citizoin -i-nd ,,)o,,a<)rt;
:t10 C' '3 9 j1''1°t3 i•t9 11V '. ( o vo ) G,.,.M F} ..':L, `37'v :7
'IiZ` �.. ''? • • .._ ')`i...! I.o 1'3Gr T` a r r. iiF')
��3Ll".1;: . .`Yy Y%1=iC 01 '-1-3 ciry. .o `1'• n1a i)3`.t",11�+ S13 ./?7 -o h _ .)
but no; it into .4 �.'�•.�V'.:_i�i l).. ..I.I.F1�
or `_Amol0.hor ir'.:'L�'i'.' ;C or •i tl .`2''':l`1l�Lf'JL'+3! t'iw'1 our f1112''° 1:iOT".3 +,i lc):1
Coop"
1 z7t_1?iY' aa'fL11.':t_ ?''1C= 1ic;i�c`ar�dilly is
`J ua ll`7�7-3 .i`t,;:,.T(am ea�k1!A-by sliould loa3 not mor?i "1aan f?v`a
L-)7-1:t-"id t0 ',1 l ".ar0 111 r , izf"1 Ar o?10 ut-ory, .,i yh a
ioi`;'.t of f'ry f't on f o}i:. Rio._ .,orF31: not 01',3 V."11
in a-,Id nu L-or?9 67vul .,-IS f Ot
Etter ""a,' f9•:� t3';kl,{ ,?Siii1 by "1 )rC+ta.t F1'i'(-m-rtly O:i"+1'2',3♦ iFiZ'2 .' }`71'_if
t 1i1�ia. 3 :fits zu tY1y f1t%:1 3r ,oOd Ci'+:li) ! Cdeltr011 J.f 13iT' 11it IC�L ?
for yo�xu. cur:?y tie
:souja :13 ;.ioaljs•.ii „%—i to incluifi thovo ro:Aric.Uons <=a that
our Pature c:ov31oj7 i,"11t c-an `)a proP=°r1, controlled.
incoraly and :lopoPullys
m Beak
"1 574 FigdC-�llog strait. Dorothy L. 7r4,ck
1,11_cc - P':.1a Dos3rt City Council
BEKI NS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO.
P.O.HOX 1103,PALES DESERT, CALIVORN!A 02260
i
I MANAGEMENT DIVISION REAL ESTATE DIVISION
72-811 HWV III (SUITE 201) 72245 EL PASEO
PALM DLSEI.T,CALIr ORNIA 92210 PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260
PHONE(714) 346-115I PHONE(714) 346-1154
December 6, 1974
Mr. Paul Williams
Director of Environmental Services
City of Palm Desert, Ca 92260
Dear Sir:
Bekins Property Management Company respectfully requests that
our property on the Southwest corner of El Paseo and Hwy 74 be
re-zoned in the new city general plan to a Specialty Commercial
land use element; to permit us to use the property for a
Condominium Sales and rental office in our operations.
When this zoning change is made we will re-submit our building
plan with revisions to make the present building structure a
permanent type with foundations, etc.
Attached is a copy of the land plot and an architectural drawing
which will later be revised to include the proposed changes for
a permanent structure.
Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
r-
<-m-
Chapman ;
President
Bekins Property Management Co.
> x
JC/bp
TQ
a ,re.,
Y
4'AG
•Pest' •�•.., C ;, 1�, o
10(I; C 4
lk
oo 0
. � te-
I
a
�41 t oy
0
NJ
V \f o t
-'sue y O
c p
r o /xoo
.y,1.O3 Fr
L
A
p LS 14
ot
v
rG O n` Of
as
cl
o � w
! °' B°!f• i.S-r .p T o
sigovc � v
JJ
page 6
r
sa
a ➢ 1 t COMPLETE t `
-PT, 1 t
d
BEKINS
{
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY
T � I S PROUD TO ANNOUNCE A COMPLETE
_. _..... HOME MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT TO
Mr. Bob Sarckley SERVE OUR N74,IY DESERT CUSTOMERS.
Maintenance Supervisor
a Carpentry a[lcctrical
❑ HANG DOORS ❑ LIGHT SWITCHES
❑ ADJUST DOORS ❑ LAMPS, EXTERIOR OR INTERIOR
❑ MINOR REPAIRS ❑ CIRCUIT BREAKERS
❑ SMALL ADDITIONS ❑ TIME CLOCKS
®Wiodm4rs ®Appliances
❑ SMALL WINDOW REPLACEMENT ❑ REFRIGERATORS
❑ SHOWER ENCLOSURES ❑ WASHING M/\CHINES
❑ ADJUSTMENTS ❑ CLOTHES DRYERS
❑ SCREENS ❑ ICE MAKERS
o Plumbing ®Air Conditioning
❑ HOT WATER HEATERS ❑ FAN MOTORS
❑ THERMOSTATS ❑ CAPACITORS
❑ HEATERS ❑ WIRING
❑ GARBAGE DISPOSALS ❑ RE—CHARGE
❑ COMPRESSORS
HOURLY RATE: $13.50 (PLUS PARTS)
00 e eeA-Ze
346-1151
e S s o n ci
propeFLY
a n a i C-l"02m, e n L
and
it `t
mEllinienance
r
BEKINS
PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
COMPANY
i
I
f
FFi
i
�j
}
l
f
i
f
f
4
it
i
I
(
1
Relax. '
We'll take care of it. `
And that can include just about everything
you want it to include.
We start with common area maintenance—
and go on from there to our other services
available to your owner association or to "
individual members. ,
The major services are done by our full
time employees; a few special items, we :n-0
sub-contract. Either way, our volume gives
you the same result: one source, lower
costs, faster service. (And in an emergency,
only one phone call to make.)
Our aim: provide all of the important R {
management and maintenance services so '-- -- - l
that you can do what you came here to
do—relax and enjoy the good life. ""- 1 e
Who are we? y�
f
We're part of Bekins. Bekins performs
quite a number of services: commercial
building maintenance; hospital maintenance; '
a national distribution service; corporate,
commercial and household moving
nationally and internationally; property •°'`° w _.w.*`-`- �y� ,
management and more.
So, since we're part of a large national F '�
corporation, you can count on us not only
for quality service but for financial stability
today and tomorrow as well.
9
-f
a � .
9
We take care of.-
page no.
Grounds '
maintenance 4--5
Pool maintenance 6
Sprinkler system _
maintenance 7 '�
Outside lights repair
and replacement 7 .�.
Pest control 7
Guard service 8
Maid service 8
Linen rentals 8
Emergency repairs 9 °
Checking the premises 1 l
in your absence 9
Association
accounting 10
• Collecting and
paying 10 �-
• Real Estate
rentals ,
and sales 11
4
r
}
ct pex,�....o. ' .�...w .1.- a .ra .z..Y z 3 •d'n . .:w rgi;r w£ ........ 'WA Iy_.e r S I., .�&,y.r to"��#.-,if'`W � _,.i& 2i._. ..�iir'°,.� s `... ..�•'t. �• "
We take care of:
_
Grounds
maintenance �.
Common area grounds get our total care. - ':���.--•=`r
Lawns are cut, watered, fed and seeded
with annual rye for bright green landscapes
year around. ° l; ••
Flower bed areas are kept weed-free.
Annuals are planted for winter blooms.
Hedges, shrubs, trees are trimmed and
pruned. - L
Walkways and other areas adjacent to
lawns are swept and washed clean.
And our same complete care can be
extended to private patio and garden areas
for your full group or for individual t
members.
1
r•
` Large six and three
s faced mowers make
short work of broad
expanses of lawn.
Single models are
used for smaller areas
and grooming of
greens.
pip 1„•
1
T t
r
r� �� •.: ' �.4....' ,.l.s.•,:. :'-_:.r..._.:.;- iv. ..... ., s
`I A fleet of well-
` �, •�"-.ice._ �"�'"a
maintained vans,
trucks and trailers
does most of the bulk
p work, freeing skilled
1y .,. hands for the care and
grooming of lawns,
shrubs and flower
_ beds.
rw
is `-•` ±±{{ • j
r
r <
a -
d '
s
i ,
!; _
��r✓ A�
31E'm
a� 3
:u
01
B�1^
No tracking cut grass into your home after 1 ; " '' 41.
a stroll on the lawn;we remove all cuttings.
fir. ;' � '►�; � .•
ip
t
_.rr. ..i .�....c.. +`-a v � �i ° ....,�.'" ��.� _.r is, ,.. ` .....,, " �:'+a �s�'.. a•c a� � .' a, � y \ r,..► d�-'. +� ..... .!� r�-°:_-�' a
R
i
We take care of
Pool ,, r
�+ 1
maintenance
Pools are kept the way ideal pools are
supposed to be—clear, blue, clean, inviting.
All pools are vacuumed regularly. Tiles
are scrubbed clean. Chemicals are checked 7,,__.� -�
and replenished. Pumps, filters, and heating T, _ •.
systems are maintained.
And after heavy winds or storms sweep
quantities of debris into the waters, we're
able to clean the pools and quickly bring
them back to top condition.
L .
_..E
Pools, pumps 4
and filtering
systems are `"" ,
checked regu-
larly for needed '
care and
maintenance. a'
r
N
[ Special vans help make sure the
t right materials and equipment are
at the job when it's needed.
f
t
i
We take care of: e
Sprinkler systems
Sprinkler heads are checked and cleaned. j
Automatic timers are maintained. A van '`" 'used exclusively for sprinkler systems keeps t
replacement heads, timers, pipe and other taa a�ais.: �r
supplies at hand.
Vest control
{
All outside areas are searched for any
trace of garden pests. We bait and spray
promptly when and where needed for sure
control. ,
An inside pest control service is available
on an individual or group basis with 46121
service tailored to specific needs.
Outside lights -
Routes are run regularly to make sure all
outside lights are burning and timers are
functioning properly. Replacement or 'a 1
repairs are done on the spot. Timers are
reset throughout the year to match the
r-
sunset hours.
a.
o
O'
p �
y .
R
e r4
A •
u
i
4
, Y
�n R'
d
E
We take care of:
Maid service `
Maids are available on either a regular
r schedule or on-call basis. Charge is by the
hour. All household duties may be -
included—general cleaning, windows, baths,
kitchens—whatever your needs.
Linen rentals
It's a simple way to make sure there are
always fresh linens in the bedroom, bath
and kitchen. Linens are available on a fixed x, .
schedule or on-call.
Emergency repairsµ+
We have reliable, expert repair men on
call 24 hours a day. The result is a quick ( �
response to your call for help, whatever the
problem—air conditioning, plumbing,
electrical appliances, roof or structural
work. _
....,..s,�Ys ^T3" 'P,+^w.-+ -:°�»',++^a'nc4lv^;A+.e�....n^ry..+�Thv.C'/+2?^ r _.�xeep..-.r. vM'?YT+.,..•at«�.+iMn.rp "�'TCgB%. ., v.ze.-sx .. n •e+.x
•t 1
bm�
k i
0
We take care of:
J
f
Guard service
Uniformed, armed guards are available to f
patrol on a regular basis. Particular
attention can be paid to units left vacant for
extended periods. Guards are always on r
call, 24 hours a day for any emergency. "a
Checking the
premises in
your absence
Residences are checked to be sure
everything is secured. Special attention is
paid to appliances, plumbing units and roof
leaks that may cause water or other damage
in the owner's absence.
{ i
1
/•� 1
"a r
r
• 1 4 V C
I j
• 6
. a
2
s�.
s
We take care of:
Association I -A
accounting RosrY. pROP.I
4 acy�aree COMW
e collecting and
paying
4 �
Money—it can be the big headache in an
association; our service is designed to make
sure it isn't. We handle: F
All invoicing and collecting from members
for regular fees and special assessments.
Payment of all association bills—utilities, €'
taxes, insurance, special services, our own
charges, etc. 5,n`
Maintenance of an impound account
against future expenses if requested by the
association.
And other money management functions
as needed. 1'
All accounting is carefully and fully
documented. '
Details, paperwork,
documentation—help from
t a computer—bring a fully
professional business
approach to the financial
accounting for your
{ k" association.
�i
f
I
a f
� y
1 ,
1
k ' 1
5 yyy 1 f _
,
We take care of:
Real Estate
rentals and sales
Each individual member and your
association as a group benefits from our f j
real estate service. We're in a unique
position to know the concerns of both.
So—interested renters and buyers coming
to us are carefully screened as responsible °
parties only. .F !
For rentals—we help your members k '
establish an appropriate base price and
meet the other essential tax requirements.
And it's a walk-away rental management ,-
service for your members; we do it all—
interview, show, rent, invoice, collect
payments, maintain the property.
We take care of
our investment
in good living. n
1
+
L_.I
Rea!Estate values in the valley change
quickly.Our daily involvement through at/
of our services with both new and existing
1 r`' developments helps keep us current.
1644
,' BB
7" ILL
n
J
1 may+'. � i '� T a' e ' '^•`.q �+ a �
e >
t x
u.
..._ .. ,
r° Ail, £f:'M'�.-� �.. '� 7 � e .s+!aS '`> 1"4`.a r p 4 ° t d.�.+1.1 �c u Y �,,�^». ♦. �. a. ..`.� �
4
t
f
d
5
f
We take care of
everything.
� E
BEKINS �
PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
COMPANY
72-811 Highway 111
Palms to Pines Plaza
U C B Building
Palm Desert, California 92260
(714) 346-1151
Real Estate Rentals
and Sales
72-245 El Paseo
Palm Desert, California 92260
(714) 346-1154
Bekins Moving and Storage Company
68688 Perez Road
Cathedral City, California 92234
(714) 328-6521
a PAIM
1 ✓ 1511
�cz �a��v, /7�� �t _ Y•�1 c--j'y,_ X ....;crd,�""
r.
.. >., a>,:... .. �.."s f..} „. .-., 6::°e '.n.L,� 3 �. dii'"`A• .i. .a,)... �..1..tt �' �"t ,l i%"'
.a. '.f....4'a. Y•. :. .» �...E_`,._.... .n t..l .-... i,...i. �? � -d� i.. +w7.R.
b
'V
a
>
.. a
_ .
wt8 c,..4 ,..«..%
ram,,,,»? f,,.t 'ti.','..�.♦� .� .. ..'-- ._ �4:..: 4. ..... ..i, + ..-i a.'� � i...t..� L.y.... -t.S... :f . .. .. .._ >.,5.,._
CnJ �., .. .>.3 i x. ,.- ... �' -'' Y.,..,._i,. 1+,.,..f.:.. •s��a":l r� .., �i.° .rt�:t...... ..�.... .-_ ri'-i:'•y
:,,ti d:�.::, .L . ,. ._, y :..+ t._.>;:: e...c_ . 1`? a�.c>.�.. 1.•�#;'' .1.,`. _ s.t.'.. E.+ .
r .a 1
.�.�.\-.
,L. .:..ryL.i. .:.:.. t��.., ..:.,.,... a...ii .x,
1 1-" � � " "5 ".'3:a- }�.�....1.1.':- .,.'i :_ . ,..°4=7'a•�..''� 4 r.> ..�f=.. . .F.a,.t �`:'1-��. «. .'f.'. ... ..s.� �.i.�� ...- t.
r or
'.n.a:. s.-�.:? ... y., S,.♦ 1, .Ke O'k
�...a..4 ...4. i �.).- .' :.•�.. .a .,.J,•w L.-.S.x.t"�`..� a. .�' �. r4 C-A-�. 1 i:l Crii io,.Ll, -L♦ d:2-, y
'fsi't...,.y ,. L1..♦.+..s d,J. A. .;2 �•IL 4? .:L ..`'^�'l:•
' the `,-#J 111
b 9 - on t:In c, a C} .i_ a s f w.} 3 ,L.11 "' �.,,o c-..;�� c r t" >. � • i'%.3 .-
},'i
ly 1' 4i
yr.p•• }' j / !
V C e 2; •a .i • ,�.5�:''a>
'.�f..4«>a.t i�'#.� a'.x.,���.'.�� �.�; � i„i;:�Li �.:TF`.�.:.�i..i'tti �.r Cay' 1'.;.i E ,14� ... .�,:�..•
• ka�:. i 1Tw:S sl _ 'C '-?.i ."C'. . TY' i r.r: .;t, f }te [:`j:.%t1 Cn j.Ci
..>.. c""t
8
t
JL73i �i� »i1i3.ci t±: •
tit V''tcr. Shia 'l,i , '..�•,1.turc 'i-tvii La' i ii,;y Of the
�i . ((�� d�I''�• y. � w ;
,G �.6'" A�.. 4! 4,d ..h...ci=.:. ,,.,• 1.2a S. .?7��r3F :...,�. 3 .L,�,. -� ♦P Y'#..6.:.:.�[�,,.r. jy.,,"J icy `
"'`s l r• a. a ' '
..L??..3pp.^:i.:.w..1 f,.,}�♦ ... ,,.__ ,}}..w A• 3, r.... ��i.t.�... a ({ -�¢q•� ,�� �nn. x��''++��
i.tA .C.�:!..L{; ".1>-�°C L" ", ..`i, J.L r1�Yf.a i.A` .i C1.0i.iw - -3.., -C
2
I r C': �'o 0! 10 11'4. i h 1,411
o' V:`7 1�011
3--
t
-y
? 5 .7..o L�o L il'., J
C
7 7
t A
Z'.
A:c :C 1.
E C.,n cvory
-"Ik� a 2 i- T.4 a
L 1:
A,
5
ct""t
C
'au" C
At a Meeting of the Board of Directors of Concerned Citizens of Palm
Desert, on Dec. 3, 1974, unanimously approved the above.
Yours very truly,
CONCERNED CITIZENS OF PALM DESERT
�2-
f' �L
President
Secretary
o. Pox 06
December 10 1-974
To 0,,1 The City Council
Pijm T)-sprt ('-i!Aforrla 922C0
1 O11.T C A PT -f)EV'�,,f'O P,.�ETJ,P
Re ATOPT )F
This letter -1-s o. er.er l expr,,,,ssinr of the on-inions , wishlcs :end
doc-ire.�7 of tlbe 0,.-nFrs o-F 1, located on
# ?4 near itc i-tersr,r-tinn with Shado,i., '-i1urtain 7iri.ve . It re-rrr,-
Bert- +hp f'Er,11n-s of ",I) per-,nrl�-, , and t,1hc--! o,,lrcrshi-p of 2'� occ u-n
residences .
This F,rroi-,ip hoe" not ,vish to 1-1,-nede well. rp!:�,,-ulat^d T)ro-
for Pali m D-snrt but is -nri -nprily -in
-�-vi rorm ur 1-0 row.
na t u ra 1 d e r T, ir w�, 1-rlvc liv,
do '-J)'p' wish for Defzert to
cc-nt-r of Cnach�-.-]Jri. V�--11 P',
tourist tr!' O-,,, convention ,,atherir�'s, or shorp-in.,r Center.
It is our sincere hone that future rlarnin- would
I. Kepn o-r residential Prea, free from further
e Y ncro -,
" -,Cmert 1)Y
2. T11mit all. residential_ bullcAn.c7s including motels to
one story with a hei-lot o-f not more th,-.,-i 15 feet
3.
Limit -- ' I -om—rcir3-1 to two stories , and
not exceedin,r 24 feet in hpiE3--1-
4. Preserve low desert rrofilr- of our cit,,r which
in the -r),3--t Tn-Irie it blerd into the natural beaut,,r of
our desert.
We ure-e you to adont only :3. 1-71,-tture T)ln-- of dev(,-1or7r---rt whi-ch will
incivap these 1J-7itations and mp.'re Posp;- ble the above, objective.
Very truly yours
Sands And Shadows # 1
Board of overnorc
B,
Whitsed C -.'La-in P't ,man
PALM DESERI`O� PROPE,_RTY 0Xx,`i141_'-PS ,.��!!�SOCIATION
P.O. BOX 1244 PALM DESERT, ('ALIFORNIA 92260
TELra-jiorm (714) 346.26(Y,
A Nan-Profit Corporation
December 13 , 1974
llonora.';le ayor and
,em,hers of th- --i,tv Council
C i 4C-v 1 11a.
Pal.m Ca'lifornia 92260
F,e A in T)e,a From a -n-o v a i
- of the 'en(,ra'L Plan an(J Environmer.,L.al
Impact 1'1-_T-.)or . by t'ri_e Palm Desert 111a,l-,nin�-, Commission On
December 9 , 1974 .
Gent le: en
1�e res-ectfully reauest that tl- c, followinoChances he made
L
in the :,7 i lse-, and Liam rCT)3r-L : '_`he 111 Precise Plan"
may or mav not r)e a Dart of the C'eneral 11.an, as aT)T)r,cved by the
PaIr. 1esert PlannIn,,7, the Staff a(lvi,,ied "'That the :
Staff L
ideas and conce-:)-r_-s are Within final General Tlan
Some as an,)rove d 1, _L_ S
oil om of the pales and
numbers listeu' below are from tne 'Trecis,' Plan" .
1. Page 11 , r)ar. a7raph 1 states in Tart j-- imary trade area
for _,Pa ITii Desert whicl, could be served 11-v Pall": 'Desert are the
Cities of Palm Desert , 11,_;ncho Inddan '.1ells an�-d
Cathedr_-11 C_- tv . (7 -,,CMe from
- _M Palm. Springs
Coachella a.nd in"`ic.
Page 11 , C, The location of department stores in
Palm Dosort is based On - `_"xcellent acc?ss provided by
fliahway 111"- "The Central location of Palm Desert in relation
to other Cities in the Coachella Vallev and .the Availability
of large T�arcels of IanG'" .
These written statf.2T:,,(,nts a,'J,o.,v-, With oral statements by 'vlilsey
and Have and the Lan(? Use Classification on MaT) fi7,. 13 Land
Use Pale 15 4A prove that the intent is to make the -)resent
Incorporated Area of Palm 71^sert -Chr- re_ ol ional shopping area
of the Coachella Valley and this
4S to be concentrated along
the ,.7estern Portion, of Tliq.!j,.V ]_II
On Pale 11. and 12 - Hotel Der,-,and , the statements "In Palm
Sprinp,s , 111ote1 sites are more difficult to locate" : "Palm
Desert with commercial land availat)le along Highway 111 ,
could capture a small secTment of -Lh-; --z new Hotel Demand" -,
D e-i an d. exis-ts SOT a -Lota.1 oil 300 to U00 new hotel rooms in
the Hi7hway ILI! -El Paseo corridor" also nroves the intent
of the General Plan is to mare Palm Desert the i!otel Center
Palo%D&%nert Properly Ownera Assoc66on
2
%owe
of the oachelld
Similar statements in the 7,eneral Plan are :
Page 1.3 , Zone type C Regional. Comninrcial : "Re-presents a
neucleus of lep',innallv Criented fdcilitiF�s" . Also , fi7ure 6 ,
after pale 18 Zone C as "regional commercial" .
Land Use I.Element - laae 1-8-4
"Regional Commercial/Core Area Comi-aerciall,
1 "Full Line R'eta-"l Outlets servin,,,, the entire Coachella
Va,121 e v;'
i i c I i id n-7 a variety of Restaurant and Hotel facilities " .
Further , or, i-)af7e I- B-1 , titled F-e,-ional Context , "The
frameworl, for the Pal,-, Desert Land use pattern is regional
in 'lature" .
We request that anv statement i_nferrinF, that the present Incor-
porated area or ','alm. Desert is to become. the "Sho-rmin Center"
or the "Hotel Center" of the Coachella VallDy be removed from
the Ceneral Plan and, statements to the contrary be inserted in
the general Plan . 1,11so -V�ie renuest that any classification that
would so ind-licatc. be rei-,loved From cany maT-) or elan of the General_
Plan in the Present incornorated areci of Palm Desert .
We further reiuest- tl,at tihe Land ITse ( fi��ure 1-3 , T)a-e
I .B . 4 . a) 1)�, cha-i-?,� as 'o_1_2o-.,is :
A. South o '4i7h,..7a,1 "-I! and North of PaF I s Path
from EJIL7h-,iay 74 to the s11CStel—n iioundary of Palm. Desert ,
all be as C. P.S . and any residential zonin¢
"Low Densit,
allowed in the area be it_7 3-5 to the acre .
B. West of ' ontere,,, to HiFhwav Ill. 'forth of Highway III
from -the intersection of ',"Ionterey to Rancho Grande - V7est
to Fairhaven Drive and then North to 44th Ave . and West
to TTi 7hway 11-1 , all should be in C .P .S . and any residential
USC allowed in this area should be "Low Density 3 to 5
to the acre" .
C. North of Ave . 44 to the Jestern Bounclary of 17)alm Desert
and East of TliF-,hway ill to the storm channel all be changed
to C.P. S_ and an/ residential use allowed in the area be
"Low Density 3 to 5 to the acre" .
These chan7es will retain the image and character of Palm
Desert and allow for sufficient additional commercial deve!oT)-
ment to serve all the needs of the residents of Palm Desert as
repeatedly stated by many residents and as promised by the
Members of the City Council in their election campaigns .
Pihvi'Deoert 1'roperly Ownrra Ar ,.-;&Lion
• I rave 3
2 . We rogues that the 17en�ra_,[ "Plari be changed to provi-le that
� 7�
a ma."Ill-L-1 u In density of 5 ta, the Ftcr,� 1)(-: allo,.,iod it, all resi-
dential develolpim-ilts in th,-2 pre ant Incorporated area Of-
via%, Ill to tlio NorLh '3oundary and. from
lm Desert fror�, i-L;,,,1
t 1,e fast 'i o un.d a i_-; to t 1,1 c '.,I e 3 t lfound Liry '-'(-)r t-Ilie following
reasors :
This will. allow the ,,,IX4.Tr�U,.,i overall T)dens , tv ossihle and
. A
still pro-,Hrle a reasonable T-)rote ct ion of all the Environ-
mental factors that ar(--_ beecming increasirig]-y critical . This
c!-Ian7e is also necessary lbecausf:� a meat deal of land has
'a-1-r--a(ly been sub('iviled into 10 ,000 to 18 ,000 square foot
lots which, necessary a ClelSSifiCcltiOn or 3 to 5 to
the acre . 11any other acres are subdivided so that c.i inayii-nujn
of 5 to the acre would be compatible* and consistent . Hundreds
of undevelo--)od acres are, not zon(---cl Rl x ( 9000 sq . ft . lot
size) requirincT, less than 71 to the acre and still other
hundreds of acres are zoned RI xx ( 10000 so . ft. lot size)
on which a. ma:t4r,,Ury�j of Lj to the acre can barely be accommodated.
To increase the allowable density -.-ould also increase the
value of the DroDert-,, and start a of increasing land
prices which minimizes the i:)ossibilit,7 of obtainin- less
expensive homes . Th- devr,,loner alone profits to the J,-trirert
Of the rest of the Clitizens . To increas.? the densit-v to more
than 5 per acr,'' would create adverse an: irreversible erivi-
ronmental effects, far ' reater thl-n those eyTr,-�ssed in the
-1 T
JInvironment'l-1 -nDaCt Renort of the General. Plan . Eighteen ( 18)
units to the acre with an average of 3 persons -iper family is
54 people nor acre . On"C'n ( 7) units pCr acre W4th 3 to the
family is 21 to the acre . Five ( 5 ) units with 3 T-.,er family
is 15 per acre . Certainly 15 persons per acro should be
the, maximum aillc�-iable on tho Desert where the Environment
is ver— fragile . if a desirable dev-1opment is presented
that requires a. chan--e t2h,' General '''Ian can be amended to
accommodate 4t anr! this JL; a m.uch bctt(�r a-DT-1roach t1lan
4
indi-catin c, in the Ceneral Plan that a hi-c-her derisity is I V,
able and therebv ,2ncouracr,_Lng the bad developments to be
presented.
3. In the area of the T_)alm DosertL Property 0,iin(3r_-- :,ssociation ,
we request ti-Lat th-�; "Low TD-!nsiLy classification" of 3 to
to tho acre i�e Zranto,,! as aDprovec] 'LA, the Palm Desert
For the -reasons mentioned herein ,^je respectfully request thlat
the `3--neral Plan , the Env_, ron1-!intal 1!-,,-)act Re-Dort , and the
Plan be revised accord in c iv .
PivJm DevertProperty Owners Aim- ntion
'ape it
In ref,nrenc�� to our nr:�vious rerueslt , we wou-'---,i like to
agaLr) as3�1 t'-at re-Iidenti a I 1� IiTnited to sinF,'I.e
story and commercia-I const-ruct-ion 1-.(? limit,c(I to two story . You
Will note we 1lave 01"Qitted specific he h-ts .
The Drecedin,- Lion to tli,2 and Cit"! Council
of Pal,-,, Desert ar)T-)—Iovc,-! by zlie Sloar<-i of Dircctors of the
Palm Desert 3,-mers l'issoci-rit-ion at a sT)(-,-cial- meetin,
held Dece,.1 I. / , 1, 0 7 4 .
ber
Yours truiy ,
PALM T)T,S RT PROPERTY OW' 171D,") ASS111 .
z
Rar')ara Revnolds (Mrs . )
Administrative Secretary
cc : JI-ach Counc-L
Staff
01\" ' DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
r� f f �'°•" CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY
1 c011blS' .
J. ELMER CHAMBERS
idlt'F�Itsili P.O. BOX 248
_________.__ —._._ COUNTY FIRE WARDEN C STREET & SAN JACINTO AVE.
PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370
TELEPHONE (714) 657-3163
December 6, 1974
City of Palm Desert
Department of Environmental Services
Planning Division
P.O. Box 1648
Palm Desert, California 92260
Attention: Samuel Freed
Gentlemen:
Thank you for the opportunity of reviewing the draft "Palm Desert General Plan".
Our comments are primarily directed toward the elements which historically
affect the fire service; specifically, the circulation element, 2. Public safety
element and 3. Conservation and open space element.
1. Circulation Element:
Traffic circulation is of utmost importance in the rapid movement
of large fire apparatus and rescue vehicles (including paramedic squads
and ambulances) from place to place during times of emergency.
The Highway Network Exhibit (including existing and proposed highways)
will establish a fine system of major traffic arteries when completed.
Local or internal circulation should include similar design criteria
providing at least twc routes of ingress/egress to each geographical area.
The use of dead or cul-de-sac roads should be kept to a minimum to
avoid confusion and congestion during emergency situations.
2. Public Safety Element:
As Palm Desert continues to develop, more fire suppression and rescue
facilities will be required to provide a high degree of safety to life
and protection of property, from the ravages of uncontrolled fire.
During all stages of development, adequate supplies of water for
"fire flow" should be required to insure sufficient supplies at the
time total or ultimate development is achieved.
In the areas of structural development fire stations should be located in
such a manner as to provide a maximum travel distance of 1-1/2 miles
for the first Engine Company and 2-1/2 miles for the second due Engine
Company. This would theoretically require installation of fire stations
approximately 3 miles apart. The maximum (traveldistance for the first
due engine) could be increased to two miles for residential districts con-
sisting of one and two family dwellings and up to four miles in areas of very
low density (1-3 du/ac.) where such dwellings have an average separation
of 100 feet or more
If buildings 3 or more stories in height are contemplated, aerial apparatus
(ladder trucks) will be required to protect them.
City of Palm Desert
Attn: Samuel Freed
December 6, 1974
Page -2-
As the City expands, the probability of simultaneous fires, the number of
responses, and the need for placing additional equipment in service or
relocating equipment during periods of high frequency of alarms should
be considered. Consideration should be given providing some protection for
all areas during multiple alarms or simultaneous fires which require the
response of all or a large portion of the apparatus regularly in service.
In addition to the existing and proposed fire stations shown, you may wish
to include proposed fire station sites in the areas of:
1. Monterey and Interstate 1.0
2. Approximately three miles southeast of Monterey along
Interstate 10
3. Country Club and Monterey
4. Highway 111 East of Cook Street
11�115. Portola and Highway 74
3. Consideration and Open Space Element:
The study areas extends some considerable distance south of existing
city boundaries well into the Santa Rosa Mountain Range. Although
much of the area at lower elevations has only very sparse vegetation,
the higher elevations (extending to over 5,000 feet) includes areas
of extensive vegetation, in very rough terraine that is considered
a very significant wildland fire hazard. Prior to annexation of
.these areas, a study should be made of the cost to the city to provide
mountain fire fighting forces.
We are available to provide any further assistance which may be required.
J. ET'tTER CHMTBERS
Coun ire i�Iarden
GECIQE SCHULTEJANN
Fire Protection Planning
and Engineering Officer
GJS:jl
CCNCI;I:I (,1F'T lI:NS 01' PAIII DESERT love
P .O . Box 1511 ,
Palm Desert, Calif . 92260
December 16, 1974
i
The Honorable Mayor Clark and
rlemb-er.s of the Palm Desert City Council
City I-la' 1
Palm Desert, Calif . 92260
z
Appeal from approval of the General Plan and :Environmental Impact
Report by the Palm Desert Planning Commission on December 9 , 1974.
We respectful.l_y request that the following changes be made in the
Wilscy an�i Ham report: The "Highway 111 Precise Plan" may or may
not be a part of the General Plan as approved by the Palm Desert
Planning Ce,:rL:.Lission but the Staff advised "That the idea and comcepts
are incorporated within the final General Plan as approved by the
Planning Corn-mission" . Some of the pages and numbers listed below
are from the "Precise Plan" .
1. Page 11, paragraph 1 states in part "the primary trade area for
Palm Desert which could be served by Palm Desert are the Cities
of. Pala; Desert, Rancho Mirage , Indian hells and Cathedral City.
Some demand will come from Palm Springs , Coachella and Indio. '
Page 11, pa.ragraph 6: The location of Department Stores in Palm
Desert is based on - "Excellent access provided by Highway 111"
"The Central location of Palm Desert in relation to other Cities
in the Coachella Valley and the availability of large parcels of
land" .
These written statements along with oral statements by Wilsey &
Ham and the Land Use Classification on Map fig 1-3 Land Use Page
1B 4a prove that the intent is to make the present Incorporated f
Area of Palm Desert the regional shopping area of the Coachella
Valley and this to be concentrated along the Western Portion of
Highway Ill
i
On "page 11 & 12 - Hotel Demand, the statements "In Palm Springs
Hotel sites are more difficult to find" ; "Palm Desert with com-
mercial land available could capture some Hotel Demand" ; Demand
exists for a total of 300 to 400 new hotel rooms in the Highway
111 - E1 Paseo area" also proves the intent of the General Plan
is to make Palm Desert the Hotel Center of the Coachella Valley.
Similar statements in the General Plan are:
Page 18 , type C - fig 6 flap . "Represents the neucleus of Region-
ally Oriented facilities" .
- a
t
3
r
-2-
Land Use Element - Page 1-13-4
"Regional Commercial"
1 - "Full Line Romil Outlets serving; the entire Coachella Valley" .
4 - "Including a variety of Ilntel facilities" , Page 1-13-1
Regional Context "The framework for the Palm Desert Land use
pattern is regional in Nature" .
We request that any statement inferring that the present Incor-
porated area of Palm Desert is to become the "Shopping Center" or
the "Hotel Center" of the Coachella Valley be removed from the
General Plan and statements to the contrary be inserted in the
General Plan . Also we request that any classification that would
so indicate be removed from any map or plan of the General Plan
in the present Incorporated area of Palm Desert.
We further .request that the Land Use Map (figure 1-3, page 1.B .4 .a)
be changed as follows :
A - South of Highway Ill from Palms to Pines to Western Boundary
of Palm Desert all be classified as C .P .S . and any residential
allotived in the area be "Low Density 3-5 to the acre:
B - West of Monterey to Ave . 1.11. North of Highway 111 from the
intersection of Monterey to Rancho Grande - West to Fairhaven
Drive and then North to 44th Ave . •and back to Highway 111,
all should be in C .P .S . and any residential allowed in this
area should be "Low Density 3 to 5 to the acre" .
C - North of Ave . 44 to the Western Boundary of Palm Desert and
East of Highway Ill to the .storm channel all be changed to
C.P .S . and any residential allowed in the area be "Low Density
3 to 5 to the acre" .
These changes will retain the image and character of Palm Desert
and allow for sufficient additional commercial development to
serve all the needs of the residents of Palm Desert as repeatedly
stated by many residents and as promised by the Members of the
City Council in their election campaigns .
2. We request that the General Plan be changed to provide that a
maximum density of 5 to the acre be allowed in all residential
developments in the present Incorporated area of Palm Desert from
Highway 111 to the North Boundary and from the East Boundary to
the West Boundary for .the following reasons :
This will allow the maximum overall density possible and still pro-
vice a reasonable protection of all the Environmental factors that
are becoming increasingly critical. This change is also necessary
because a great deal of land has already been subdivided into
10,000 to 18,000 square foot lots which makes necessary a classifi-
cation of 3 to 5 to the acre . Many other acres are subdivided so
that a maximum of 5 to the acre would be compatible and consistent.
Hundreds of undeveloped acres are now zoned R1 x (9000 sq. ft. lot
» _3_
size) requiring less than 5 to the acre and still other hundreds
of acres are zones R1 xx (10000 sq . ft . lot size) on which a
maximum of 4 to the acre can barely be accommodated. To increase
the allowable density would also increase the value of the property
and start a cycle of increasing, land prices which minimizes the
possibility of obtaining cheaper quality homes . The property
owners alone profits to the detriment of the rest of the Citizens .
To increase the density to more than 5 per acre would create ad-
verse and irreversible environmenLt'_effects far greater than those
expressed in the Environmental Impact Report of the General Plan .
18 units to the acre with an average of 3 persons per family is
54 people per acre . 7 units per acre with 3 to the family is 21
to the acre . 5 units with 3 per family is 15 per acre . Certainly
15 persons per acre should be the maximum allowable on the Desert
where the Environmental is very fragile . If a desirable develop-
ment is presented; that requires •a change) the General Plan can be
amended to accommodate it and this is a much better approach than
indicating in the General Plan that a higher density is available
and thereby encouraging the bad developments to be presented.
3. In the area of the Palm Desert Property Owners Association, we
request that the "Low Density classification" of 3 to 5 to the
acre be granted as approved by the Palm Desert Planning Commission.
For the reasons mentioned herein we respectfully request that the
General Plan, the Environmental Impact Report, and the Precise Plan
be revised. accordingly.
The above request for changes in the General Plan was approved by the
Board of Directors of Concern Citizens of Palm Desert at a meeting on
December 16, 1974.
Yours truly,
CONCERNED CITIZENS OF PALM DESERT
f Pres .
(F}
4
Sec1t.
f
t
December ll� 1-974 `
The City Council
c/o City "all
Prickl�r Pe^.r Square
Pahl Desert , Calif. 92260
Gentlement:
It Ivas --y intention to attend the December 19th meeting
concern n,r- the arrroval of the General Plan of Palm Desert ,
but at this latest moment , I am unable to do so.
The enclosed man sho,,,s LL0 acres of lard which I rresently
own (colored reci) . It ha^ boon zoned "SD" (Sand D,,InP.$) b.
',,'Ja.slc�y and ;-Tam , land consultants.
It is my intention in th-i-s letter to ask for a zone chance
from "SD" to Medium Denpi.ty Residential. Since my 40 acres
lie next to Sun Ki.nm, aT, et:i.= ti_r_T develorment on the south ,
and next to a. future devel_orn,ent na, :ed `the Cha.rarral Club
on the :rest , it seells only lo__rical to allow me the same
tyre of densi.tY.
If the council does not agree to this, I would be furth^r
will.i.n:r to level this Ln acres over the r.gxt 5 years and
plant a rerimeter of tress around its borders , thereby
conform~pp- to medium don: -t`�r standards. Also , I would be
willi.n to be annexed to the i.ncorrorated city of Palm Desert.
Hoping ,you will rule in favor of this change , I am
Sincerely yours ,
F. X. McDonald , Jr.
2215 l"l. Broad.;,,ray,, a nt o -F 307
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
Phone: (714) 772-3837
• � �co�,,�'y 7v8
4 Ewafill
j 111 tt o o ail c
h
Lu
LU
cv
1 ( - .rvyj tiiid� 2
ce
76
1
,tom•, � •- :Ac-� `
i?�:.� •�ILyJ p= � .sue >>� �afuno� �t
4 1
r�W � ,� � � r• 3
r
at
M �
lug
h� • i y V J
lb
L�El-llj
P. 0. Box 523
Palm Desert, Ca. 92260
December 18, 1974
Planning Co=tu ssion
Pala Desert, Calif. 92260
Gentlemen:
I am not in agreement with the General Plan for Palm Desert as
presented by Wilsey and Eam, as I understand that plan.
1. I gret.tly favor retaining the present residential character of the
community, rather than. moving in the direction of raking Palm Desert the
shopping end convention center of the Coachella. Valley.
2. I believe the maximun density of future residential developments
should be about 5 to the acre, that residential building should be one story,
and commercial building should be a maximun of two stories.
Very truly yours,
Mrs. Paul Stanley
t
a
i
a
NNW
li O O s
6 0 ;
r
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Ph. 346-061.1
December 31 , 1974
This office has received your letter on the General Plan
and related Environmental Impact Report , dated
1974. Said letter was received too late to be considered
by the Planning Commission at their hearing on the Gen-
eral Plan on December 9 . However, this letter is being
forwarded to the City Council for their consideration as
a part of their public hearing on the General Plan and re-
lated Environmental Impact Report on January 6 , 1975 .
I wish to thank you for your response on the General Plan
and to indicate that your concerns will be fully evaluated
by the City Council during the public hearing on the Gen-
eral Plan.
Very truly yours ,
Harvey L. Hurlburt
City Manager
HLH/kcw
THIS LETTER SENT TO T-Z" :"KTTACHF ') LIST
Nome
MAJESTIC REALTY CO.
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES
6252 EAST TELEGRAPH ROAD, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90040, PHONE (213) 685-5380
December 31, 1974
Mr. Paul Williams
Director of Planning
City of Palm Desert
45 - 275 Prickly Pear Lane
Palm Desert , CA 92260
Dear Mr. Williams :
Attached is a Xerox map of the 97 acres I own in the
City of Palm Desert .
I believe the general plan, as now recommended,
indicates this area as very low density, i .e . , one
to three units per acre . If this is so, would you
please advise the City Council that I concur with
the recommended use and I will be happy to work with
your staff to arrange and locate structures in a
manner which is compatible with the intent and the
interests of the City.
Thank you for your help in this matter .
Yours truly
Chas . G. Taylor
CGT:mg
Enc.
{
I
\ J
\\ -MAGNESIA-,A L L S--im -_ - -__ _ _- - _--
-� 2los
D a
DESERT OR R- ,
O
RANCHO RO ' Z T300 N
zi ♦ ZR-2 n o
R-3- gORBARA OR o7CCC
7000 PA K r z r
v-
C-P-S
Ct1OLLA� R_2 P ♦ -1 N 0 0 MIMOSA OP
�26'
W-2 �N M R-z R-1
CACTU m 7000
ARaoLEaA
r� N
i m BRUSHWOOV%R
1� � R2 r
C-P-S C-P-S � o
' GLORIA14A
a
e3
R-2-
76 00--R
� R-2-
SONORA dt N 7000
Ft
R 2-
Z SIERRA -VISTA RO / 70001NA
R' N R-2-5000 R-2 =o
[jP60;
O� �, P TAMPICO DR. R-2 rcN R-2 GUAOALUF
O A �
{�X OO tly RANCHO GRAM
OE O
R- 2-7000 Z D
Q D r
C.p` a �= R-1
c
�S56 S 7000 R-
o F
z
F-sp
E
c p -s
� R-2-6000 woo T.
f0# r
^cA� C PF Q y TA44Y 3 a~
�"
. � q
r4 p , O f
ENTAIL n ST o oC
3
o
R-2- o '� ;
w ni f
— ✓t Ln <)
n R-1 R -1
December lh, 1-974
The City Council
c,/o City Hall
Prickly Pear Square
Palm Desert , Calif. 92260
Gentlement:
Tt was my intention to attend the December 19th meeting
concerning the arnroval of the General Plan of Palm Desert ,
but at this latest moment , T am unable to do so.
The enclosed map shows 40 acres of land. which T nresently
own (colored red) . Tt has been zoned "SDI' (Sand Di.ines) by
Wisley and Ham , land consultants.
Tt is my intention in this letter to ask for a zone change
from "SDI' to Medium Density Residential. Since my 40 acres
lie next to Sun Ki-ne, an existing development on the south ,
and next to a future development named The Chaparral Club
on the west , it seems only looical to allow me the same
tyre of density.
Tf the council does not a,-roe to this, T would be further
willinp-, to level this 40 acres over the next 5 years and
plant a T)eri-meter of trees around its borders , thereby
conforminp, to medium density standards. Also , I would be
willinp, to be annexed to the incor-nnratpd city of Palm Desert.
Hoping you will rule in favor of this chanp*el T am
Sincerely yours,
me ��`�
F. X. McDonald Jr.
2215 W. Broadway, Apt. #F 307
Anaheim , Calif. 92804
Phone: (714) 772-3837
n
� D
C
1 r 1 jv
1 n
3
n � Z
o �
C �+
Z N
� o
_ w
� s�� vNIPijE n cn n� ti,' � � t►�
c� Coin s ?a
Q
to
� b
� Tq✓�s GswF - �
1 � YisT L1vNf7 Ra,
D
"fit p0 `p h r-
rb
TIWW
Q% 66
•. I `o b 1► w w �
I
I
a �
7 r
__ _
a f � � m�!► p` y, ti
► N `�
00,- 4,,�J
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY RONALD REAGAN, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 231
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 42403
December 9, 1974 Project Review
Riv-74, 111
Department of Environmental Services
City of Palm Desert
P. 0. Box 1648
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Gentlemen:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft of the
Palm Desert General Plan.
Figure 1-3, Land Use, indicates State Highway Route 111 as a
freeway with five interchange locations in the City of Palm
Desert . The present highway alignment is not conducive to
future freeway construction . Any future improvement of the
existing highway facility is proposed to conform to the
arterial or expressway cross section as indicated in the
Circulation Element of the Riverside County Master Plan.
Clarification of the City 's proposal for bicycle/golf cart
trails adjacent to the state highway is requested. Construc-
tion within the existing traveled way is not feasible due to
the existing high volume of traffic .
The Scenic Highway Element should be coordinated with
Mr . Donald C . Weaver, (714) 383-4673, the District Scenic
Highway Coordinator.
If we may assist you further in the preparation of your
General Plan, please feel free to contact us .
Very truly yours,
R. L. REDDEN
Acting District Director
By
Robert F. Pond
Project Studies Coordinator
; LIZ
T'J �ir'rl�ii�"IT"f TC!1^tocmn�nm....�. -rr�-imm,.:.,�.—y„mm�aTJ^'r�ri"lfif
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Ph. 346-0611
TO: ALL MEMBERS OF CAC
The new zoning ordinance is not ready for our review and
there are no other items on the agenda for our meeting of
December 19, 1974. Accordingly, that meeting is being
cancelled and the next regular meeting will be on Thursday,
January 2, 1975•
George "Berkey, Chairma
GVB:jk
r
ti
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
December 5, 1974
The regular CAC meeting was called to order by the Chairman at
3:40 p.m. on Thursday, December 5, 1974 at the CVAG conference room. Members
present were: Ed Peck, Lyman Martin, Bob Solis, Kermit Martin, Don Richardson,
Bob Ricciardi , Nelson Mills, Jean Ann Hirschi and George Berkey.
The minutes of the meeting of November 21 , 1974 were approved
as mailed.
Chairman Berkey reported that Wilsey & Ham had requested CAC to
review the public hearing draft of the General Plan and recommend its adoption
with any changes CAC might wish. This review and recommendation is the only
item on the agenda for this meeting.
Mr. Ron Gorman made the following presentation : A large majority
of the residents of Palm Desert, personally and/or through those elected to
represent them at public hearings, advised Wilsey & Ham, consultants for the
City of Palm Desert, that they desired to "preserve the essential , residential
character of the City" with low density and controlled height both residential
and commercial . It was their desire to retain the same atmosphere that has
made Palm Desert famous.
We therefore propose a resolution to adopt the General Plan as
prepared by Wilsey and Ham with the following changes :
1 . Remove from the consultants report and maps all reference to
Palm Desert becoming the "Shopping Center" for the entire Valley in the present
incorporated area of Palm Desert.
2. Remove all reference in maps and reports, in the present
Incorporated area of Palm Desert, for Palm Desert to become the central tourist
area for the entire Valley with large convention type hotels.
3. In the present incorporated area of Palm Desert remove from
the report all "high density (7 to 18 to the acre)" and "medium density (5 to
7 to the acre)" leaving the maximum density to 3 to 5 to the acre now described
in the report as "low density".
4. Set height limits on residential units to a maximum of 15 feet
and on commercial units to a maximum of 24 feet.
5• Change all classification and zoning in the consultants maps
and plans for the future of Palm Desert to conform to the above.
6. Withhold any expenditure of money for changes of Highway 111 ,
El Paseo and the North and South Frontage Roads for a minimum of 90 days to
allow for further study of the "Cliff Henderson" proposal and the possible
financing of it. It is recommended the City and Mr. Henderson work together on
this project as time is of the essence in this matter. This would mean Mr.
Henderson, the City Council and staff, would pool their findings because without
City backing, no individual plan would get off the ground.
R
CAC Minutes
12/5/74
The property Owners Association which represents approximately 850
individual and joint tenants of 1047 separate parcels of property within the
city limits of Palm Desert feel that this property represents many millions of
dollars of assessed valuation and is protected by recorded deed restrictions
of the Association.
They sent out a questionnaire along with the ballot for election
of their officers for the 1975 Board of Directors to about 850 people in
Palm Desert Community. The questions were as follows :
1 . Density - The consultants to the City of Palm Desert have
proposed an increase in density which would allow approximately 90,000 people.
Are you in favor of. this proposal ? Yes - 24% No - 76%
2. Do you wish to retain the present image of Palm Desert as
much as possible? Yes 91% No 9%
3. Do you wish to restrict the building heights to single story
for residential and no more than two story for commercial ? Yes 87% no 13%
The results of this survey have been forwarded to the Palm Desert
City Council and the Citizens Advisory Committee.
The first eight elements of the General Plan were reviewed and by
unanimous vote the Chairman was authorized to write a recommendation for
adoption with certain changes. A copy of the letter is attached and made a
part of these minutes .
While Wilsey and Ham had not requested a review of the Environmental
Impact Report, at Lyman Martin's request it was discussed. Lyman Martin pre-
sented a resolution as follows :
"The environmental Impact Report is one of the most fundamental and important
parts of any General Plan. It becomes increasingly important when substantial
changes in the density and/or the image and character of a community is also a
part of the General Plan.
The General Plan submitted by Wilsey & Ham for the present Incorporated Area of
Palm Desert admittedly contains such substantial and controversial changes See
Page E10 & Ell , etc. of report) . Among other things the image, character and
environment is substantially changed by including in the wording, maps and plans of
the proposed General Plan "Shopping Areas for the entire Valley"; "Convention
type Hotels to serve the entire Valley" and by increasing the Density by the
inclusion of classifications of "High Density" (7 to 18 to the acre) and "Medium
Density" (5 to 7 to the acre) . It is the opinion of many people that unless these
substantial changes are removed from the General Plan, in the present incorporated
area of Palm Desert, that the Environmental Impact Report will not withstand future
attack by developers, land owners or other groups seeking changes or relief.
Future Environmental Reports filed by developers will undoubtedly be based on the
General Plan and it is therefore of utmost importance that the Environmental Impact
report withstand any attack.
The substantial changes referred to herein will have far greater adverse effects
on the environment than is contemplated in the Wilsey and Ham report . The report
is based on out of date data and contingencies and suppositions based on this data
on which many well known authorities disagree.
-2-
s a
f
. + j
CAC Minutes
12/5/74
1 . Example - (page E5a) - "Air Monitoring Data for 1970". The rapid
development which has occurred since 1970 has made a tremendous change in the
base figures and therefore any future forecast now based on these old 1970 figures is not factual . No less than Dr. James Pitt , head of the air pollution for the
State of California, has repeatedly stated that as the density of population
increases the rate of air pollution increases geometrically. The adverse effect
has been understated in the report.
2. The adverse effect caused by the suggested changes in the very character and
image of Palm Desert , as well as the increase in density, will have far greater
adverse effect on all types of pollution than stated in the Environmental Impact
Report .
A - Water. Experts disagree with the future availability of the quantity and
quality.
B - (Page E10) Climate. The report admits increased humidity and detrimental
effects on residents. Increased humidity multiplies rapidly with increased density
and therefore density should be kept to a minimum.
C - The report states (onE10 - B1 ) "The Social changes will doubtlessly be viewed
as detrimental" and "The Primary goal is to create an organized environment of
different family types". Why make organized changes in an environment that has
made Palm Desert famous? This is not in accord with input from residents.
D - The report states (Page E10 & 11 under 2 ) " Marked changes will occur in
property values". it is true that increased density classifications in the land
use will start a cycle of increased property values which feeds on itself requiring
higher and higher density to support the ever increasing price of property. Finally
the bubble breaks and everyone but the promoter loses. On the other hand low density
controls property prices so that each piece of property may be developed so that
it is compatible with the adjacent property and to the advantage of all Palm Desert.
E - Other adverse environmental effects will occur on every invironmental factor
including solid waste, noise, light pollution, etc. etc.
When adapted the General Plan and its Environmental Impact report will give the
present and future City Councils the authority as well as the mandate to enforce
the General Plan in the future development of Palm Desert. It is important therefore
that the proposed General Plan be changed to eliminate any substantial changes in
the image and character of Palm Desert and reduce the density to a maximum of 5 to
the acre. Without these changes the Environmental Impact Report is not factual
and is based on suppositions and opinions which can not be supported.
After the reading of this resolution Lyman Martin requested that CAC
adopt this and there was considerable discussion. When the resolution was put
to a vote the following is the result : FOR: Ron Gorman, Lyman Martin, Bob
Solis & Ed Peck. AGAINST: Ted Smith, Don Richardson, Kermit Martin, Jean
Ann Hirschi and Bob Ricciardi , George Berkey, Nelson Mills.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:58 p.m.
Respectfully submitted ,
.�
5 t:
George Berkey, Chairman
49y Ri., Kay, So,cretary
-3-
r ni'_� e.,' �� _._ �� '_"�'"' ^•,^ram .
�,,UP D o7
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Ph. 346-0611
December 9, 1974
Mr. Harvey Hurlburt, City Manager
City of Palm Desert
Palm Desert, California 92260
Dear Mr. Hurlburt:
The Citizens Advisory Committee has concluded its studies of the proposer
Palm Desert General Plan. Please inform the City Council and the Planning
Commission that by majority vote, CAC recommends adoption of the Public
Hearing Draft, November 12, 1974, with the following changes:
1. LAND USE
Map (page 1. B. 4, a. ): Change specialty commercial on north side of
Whitewater Channel at Washington Street to low density residential. Delete
reference to 118, 5 acres of industrial area on Page 1. B. 7.
2. URBAN DESIGN
On Page 2. P. 1, change last paragraph to read "utilize indigenous plants in
landscaping whenever appropriate". On next to last paragraph add "public
and private parking lots" after "pedstrian areas".
i
5. CIRCULATION
On Highway Network Map, figure 5. 1, make corrections to truly show
exidting portions of Monterey and Cook Streets.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL
On Page 6. 1. P.I. delete last paragraph.
Very truly yours,
E G ORGE V. BERKEY �
Chairman
r
(P-'�4t7 I I
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Ph. 346-0611
December 9, 1974
Mr. Harvey Hurlburt, City Manager e
City of Palm Desert 4
Palm Desert, California 92260
Dear Mr. Hurlburt:
This is to inform the City Council and the Planning Commission that
Mr. Lyman Martin presented the attached resolution for adoption by
CAC on December 5, 1974. The vote was as follows:
FOR: Gorman, L. Martin, Solis, Peck.
AGAINST: Smith, Richardson, K. Martin, Hirschi, Ricciardi,
Berkey, Mills.
Very truly yours,
4
f
GEORGE V. BERKEY,
Chairman ir
- r
Lhq
I"iy'(
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane P.O. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Pig. 346-0611
October 24, 1974
r,
Mr . Joseph E. Young, Mayor
City of Indian Wells
45-300 Club Drive
Indian Wells , CA 92260
Dear Joe:
We did appreciate the opportunity to appear before you
and explain the Wilsey & Ham recommendations in our
preliminary General Plan. There will be a number of
hearings before it comes before the Planning Commission
and Council for final decision.
Your letter of October 18 , incorporating certain recommend-
ations , will be carefully considered by Planning Commission
and. Staff_ , and we welcome this input.
Ver" truly yours ,
Henri B. Clark
Mayor
HBCjjt
CC : Wilsey & Ham
Paul A. Williams
Harvey L. Hurlburt
1 �
rL
W V-r Ji
45-3C0 CLUB DRIVE INDIAN WELLS, CALIFCRNIA 92260
.:*I IYV M [ I f�«f PARV
October 18, 1974
Palm Desert City Council
P. O. Box 1648
Palm Desert, California 92260
Re: Preliminary Land Use Element of the Palm Desert General Plan
Gentlemen:
In the spirit of intergovernmental co-operation the Indian Wells City Council
has reviewed your Preliminary Concept for the Palm Desert General Plan
Land Use Element and offers the following recommendations:
1. The overall DENSITY shown is too great, particularly in
the "wind erosion areas" lying between the Whitewater
River Flood Channel and Interstate 10; and those 7-10
D. U. /Ac. categories which adjoin the City of Indian Wells.
2. Generally, very low densities of 1-4 dwelling units per
gross acre should be shown in a belt extending from
immediately north of the Whitewater to within one mile
of Interstate 10. A one mile wide belt lying adjacent to
Interstate 10 may be appropriate for low density.
(3-5 dwelling units per gross acre).
3. There is too much industrial indicated. Generally, it should
be limited to those as shown by the (current) Cove Communities
General Plan.( e. g. Monterey Avenue and Washington Street
at the freeway).
Since Washington Street and Highway 111 have both been
adopted as "Scenic Corridors", the DELETION of INDUSTRIAL
at Washington and 44th Avenue is strongly recommended.
Palm. Desert City Council
October 18, 1974
Page 2.
4. With the exception of Monterey, by reducing densities, the
need for new freeway interchanges is deleted.. Further, the
need for 'Idiagonal" roads as shown on the map is also reduced.
Consideration should be given toward deleting as many "diagonal
roads as possible since property ownerships occur along
North-South and East-West basis throughout the area. (As
a practical matter, development of property and acquisition
of R/W is difficult to accomplish when roads bisect at acute
angles).
5. In the City of Indian Wells new crossings of the Whitewater
are not necessary and would result ultimately in unnecessary
expenditures of funds for bridges. These should be deleted
from the plan.
6. The "Sand Dune Preserve" could result in a costly acquisition
and maintenance problem. It would appear that there is less
expensive land available elsewhere in the region which could
be used for such a purpose.
The aforementioned comments only address themselves to the major concerns
of the concept and are not reflective of minor issues. We appreciate the
opportunity to convey our concerns to you, particularly on items having
regional as well as local impact, such as those shown by the plan.
Very truly yours,
JCS EPH . . YO i G
Mayor
n
s o
f ` A h v
/f •
o
C h
N�
03
10 .
F � it,J�
w
o � ^ r►� « � Z v`
t�` Cours s
a
o A
o
Yid 4woos's,Qo,
m m 3
rob m
ti
rl
� � N
' e c c -ten
y
.� �,
{ r
zop 4
� I
wydd
z�
{
LETTERS RECEIVED ON GENERAL PLAN
(714) 345-2931
t S(cr_r`as_ l I
• ! C
i
( �
' 45-300 CLUB DRIVE INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA 92260
V
October 13, 1974
Palm Desert City Council
P. O. Box 1648
Palm Desert, California 92260
Re: Preliminary Land Use Element of the Palm Desert General Plan
Gentlemen:
In the spirit of intergovernmental co-operation the Indian Wells City Council
has reviewed your Preliminary Concept for the Palm Desert General Plan
Land Use Element and offers the following recommendations:
1. The overall DENSITY shown is too great, particularly in
the "wind erosion areas" lying between the Whitewater
River Flood Channel and Interstate 10; and those 7-10
D. U. /Ac. categories which adjoin the City of Indian Wells.
2. Generally, very low densities of 1-4 dwelling units per
gross acre should be shown in a belt extending from
immediately north of the Whitewater to -,within one mile
of Interstate 10. A one mile wide belt IN-ing adjacent to
Interstate 10 may be appropriate for low density.
(3-5 dwelling units per gross acre).
3. There is too much industrial indicated. Generally, it should
be limited to those as shown by the (current) Cove Communities
General Plan.( e. g. Monterey Avenue a-rid Washington Street
at.the freeway).
Since Washington Street and Highway Ill have both been
adopted as "Scenic Corridors", the DE—LETION of INDUSTELAL
at Washington and 44th Avenue is strongly recommended.
Palm Desert City Council
October 18, 1574
Page 2.
4. With the exception of Monterey, by reducing densities, the
need for new freeway interchanges is deleted. Further, the
need for "diagonal" roads as shown on the map is also reduced.
Consideration should be given toward deleting as many 'Idiagonal"
roads as possible since property ownerships occur along
North-South and East-West basis throughout the area. (As
a practical matter, development of property and acquisition:
of R/tip' is difficult to accomplish when roads bisect at acute
angles).
5. In the City of Indian Wells new crossings of the Whitewater
are not necessary and would result ultimately in unnecessary
expenditures of funds for bridges. These should be deleted
from the plan.
6. The "Sand Dune Preserve" could result in a costly acquisition
and maintenance problem. It would appear that there is less
expensive land available elsewhere in the region which could
be used for such a purpose.
The aforementioned comments only address themselves to the major concerns
of the concept and are not reflective of minor issues. We appreciate the
opportunity to convey our concerns to you, particularly on items having
regional as well as local impact, such as those shown by the plan.
Very truly yours,
J9 EPH E. YOITNG
Mayor
1VI I T C> I:� L L It fAN g G ° 1,41 T SO 5 V I C; Ta
Donald H. Mit6oll David H. Mitcliell
Care and Supervisior,, of Date Gardens and Citrus Groves
PIIO E 398-4511
MAIL ADDRESS BOX 633 • INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
November 19, 1974
City Clerk
Palm Desert, CA
Dear Sir:
It was most interesting, to listen to the projections of future Crowth
for our city as ,fires anted b`y a repilosentative of Wilsey and Ham at
the hearing at the Community Church on November 12.
Accompanied by Fir. L. Robison of Sacramento, my partner in a date garden
in the area between the Catholic Church and the site for the proDo ed.
high school, we questioned -the spea.,ier bopin to learn how the proposed.
Date Palm Pres :rve could affect us. He referred us to the Planning
Commission and suggested that we keep in touch, saying that final plans
would be some time in being developed.
We are in sympathy with what we presume is your objective, namely,
providin palms for Pale Desert. ro"he desert partis provided by filature;
the palms must ba man' s responsibility.
I would life to point out two examples which your Planning Commission
no doubt has already studied. The first being the Sun Gold area,
Ind.io' s first real subdivision and unquestionably the most beautiful.
Homes were built in a former date garden with a few selected palms
retained on each lot for shade and esthetic effect. The second is the
border planting of palms on the College of the Desert that has been a
most valuable feature of an attractive and appropriate campus develop-
ment.
The speaker suggv:3ted the possibility that as long as .;e kept the date
garden in producrUion, the objective of the Planners w a.s being fulfilled.
and later on when subdivision, the most logical final use was in effect,
that homes on the plan used in Sun Gold Should be logical. The amount
of time left in whi cb iv ,.ill be profitable to operate the acreage is
problematical, possibly between ten and fifteen years. Since both
Mr. Robison and I are "Sonior Citizens" we have thought about selling
the 22 acres we own. Ue are no under pressure to dispose of it, however,
as it is well handled by the ranch care program managed by my son. We
do not, obviously, want a Date Palm Reserve program to interfere with
a sale if and when we want to make a sale; nor do we want it to reduce
the value of the property.
,r
City Clerk. 2 November 19, 19?4
The effectiveness of the border rlanting of date palms at College of
the Desert, some of which is being cropped, suggests that the idea
C11
could be used somewhere in Palm Desert.
I have available about 100 jumbo date offshoots plus a few. male palms
that should be pla-fated no:ect April or 1,11ay. These have trunks from three
to ten feet high, irost being abou-11; fi"I�ve. Our own crew could move the
smaller ones but it could be better to call in a professional to do the
whole job. I will quote a favorable price.
Should you want me to meet with your group to go into the matter in
more detail I'll be happy to do so. The future growth of Palm Desert
is of real coiicern.
The change from the day when there was only one house in the whole area
0
south of Highway 111, to the present state of vigorous growth, is
spectacular. Your plan to make the future growth harmonious is to be
commended.
Cordially yours,
D. H. Mitchell
cmc
i
lose
369 PINE STREET SUITE 320
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
November 22, 1974
Mr. Paul A. Williams, Director
Environmental Services
City of Palm Desert
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Dear Mr. Williams :
It has been brought to our attention that there
is a proposal to rezone certain parts of the Citv of
Palm Desert,which are now a medium density zoning,
to a low density zoning, which, as I understand, al-
lows from three to five housing units per acre. At
the Council meeting of October loth, a tentative map
and conditional Use Permit for Tract 7#4442, with 6.22
units per acre , were approved.
We have every hope and desire of proceeding with
this development as soon as the mortgage money market
would ma':e it practicable. At this time , it is dif-
ficult to project how soon that will be, but it ap-
pears that recent changes in the prime rate are en-
couraging. We have planned a development which we
think will be extremely attractive and desirable
and certainly compatible with both the- environmental
and constructed surroundings.
This letter is to request that the pending re-
zoning be modified to leave intact the existing zoning
for the area of Tract �4442 , namely, medium density.
We appreciate the cooperation which we have re-
ceived from the City offices in general since their
incorporation, and hope that you will similarly give
consideration to this request.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONP4IENTAL DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY
M.CD. JAYRED, Vice President
MDJ/mpm
cc: Mr. W. Scott Biddle
el
RIVERSIDE C0€ `4-('Y BERNARD J. CLARK, SHERIFF
E t _
PHONE 787-2444 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNiA
November 27 , 1974.
Mr. Harvey Hurlbert
City Manager
Post Office Box 1648
Palm Desert, California 92260
Dear Harvey:
In response to your request to comment on the Palm Desert
General Plan submitted by Wilsey and Ham, Consultants, the follow-
ing is submitted. We've quoted the sections we see applicable ,
and provided a broad. response.
Section 6. 2 encompasses the safety element and contains the
following which relates to police protection.
6. 2.B. 1 Police protection is provided by the Riverside
County Sheriff' s Department. The Sheriff ' s
Department provides response service to requests
for service and investigative services in criminal
cases.
Comment The initial agreement between the City and the
Sheriff' s Department for law enforcement services
was to start with the minimum level of service
that was provided to the area prior to incorporation
by the Sheriff ' s Department and the California
Highway Patrol. This is the present staffing
pattern.
6. 2.B. 2 The City can plan for its own system of police
and fire protection in the future.
Comment The Sheriff will assist the City in planning for
the development of any level of law enforcement
services they determine desirable. The Sheriff ' s
Department has the capability of providing, through
contract, any level of law enforcement desired by
the City.
6. 2.P. 1 Continue its efforts to upgrade police and fire
protection in the City and establish periodic
review processes and standards to insure that
the service remains at high levels.
Letter to Hervey Bu�Wt)ert
Noveniber 27 , 1974 9.r�
Page 2
Comment A contract for law enforcement services can be
written for any level desired by the City which
would provJ�de for proper controls by both parties .
Constant review of the service is an administrative
function which is accomplished. The results of the
review is the subject or discussion with the
city and the basis for action of upgrading.
Establish local representation of the law enforcement
agency in the city as soon as possibly.
Comment If the City feels that law enforcement office
space is required and should be staffed for a
specified number of hours per day due to the number
of walk-in complaints or requests for information,
the contract can reflect such an office. However,
the cost of manning and supporting_ such an office
should be a factor to consider.
General Comment
A. Our belief is that contract law enforcement is the most
reasonable method of providing a complete service for the
citizens of the City of Pal;n Desert.
Some of the specific on-going procedures taking place with
you and those of your neigh'--,or city, which may be of interest:
1. (1) Lieutenant, (1) Sergeant, (2) Investigators , and
(14) Deputies; are assigned full--time to the Cities
of Palm Desert and Rancho Tdirage.
2. Emphasis is being placed on a positive working
relationship with the community through both formal
and informal mechanisms.
3. Deployment and scheduling are based on workload and
the needs of the community.
4 . Representatives of social service agencies are being
utilized to acquaint the deputies with the resources
in and for the community.
5. Goals and objectives have been set and planned programs
have been established to meet these objectives
(management by objectives) .
6. Two of the most important, although general, goals are
to provide a safe environment for citizens and to
improve interpersonal co wmunications and understanding
Letter:' to Ilarvey H- lbert
Novc?�,,ber 27 , 1.9"i 4 ` 0'
Page: 3
between the deputies and citizens.
7 . The deputies will contact each and every resident
and cormniercial establisi-r.ment and offer- a security
inspection to suggest methods that can be used to
better Protect t.he:ms�-,Ives from theft or burglary.
8 . In addition to the men specifically assigned to the
cities , they have behind them marry advantages of our
large department. IQ'e operate a complete records system
second to done, communication system, laboratory,
jail , civil , training and specialized investigational_
details.
Please contact me if you desire any additional information.
Sincerely,
i
BEN CLAM,, SHERIFF
BC/r
l
VJ11 J1_-, EY & Earl P.Wilsey(1892-1957)
1631 HUNTINGTON DRIVE • P.0. BOX 430 • SOUTH PASADENA,CALIF. 91030•Telephone (213) 799-9161 • Cable ''WHINT"
t
December 2, 1974 - J
2-2189-0103
r
Mr. Paul Williams
Director of Planning
City of Palm Desert
45-275 Prickly Pear Lane
Palm Desert, California 92260
i.
Dear Paul :
I have just met with Mr. Charles G. Taylor regarding his property which is
noted on the attached xerox map.
The General Plan as now recommended indicates this area as open space more specifically a park and wildlife preserve. The rationale for this was
twofold -- first preservation of the hillside areas which will be viewed by
residents of Palm Desert and secondly the CAC request for a park in this
vicinity -- as indicated on one of the drawings you brought to South Pasadena.
Mr. Taylor has pointed out to me his plans to use this property as income for
his retirement years. I have informed him of the hearing6on December 9 and 19. `
r.
In reviewing the property I believe it could be shown as very low density --
1 to 3 per acre -- inasmuch as the range of slopes within Mr. Taylor's property
is similar to portions of the Cahiulla Hills areas which is also shown as
very low density -- 1 to 3 per acre. Perhaps, in this context, the development
of the site as a residential planned unit development subject to provisions
of the grading and zoning ordinances might be acceptable to the City. Also,
since the CAC map showed the park as somewhat. of a "blob," it might be
reasonable to consider limiting the park to south of the area noted as
"County Park" on the attached map.
If, after review of these factors, you believe the land use designation should
be changed, please make such a recommendation in the staff comments to be
submitted at the hearings and, if approved, we will change the land use map.
,
z
planning engineering architecture landscape architecture surveying mapping systems s
t
1
Mr. Paul Williams -2_
December 2, 1974
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
WILSEY HAM
Larr` �; Morrison, AIA, AIP
Program Director
LBM:kp
Attachment
cc: Mr. Charles G. Taylor
Mr. Hunter T. Cook
f
t-
Fa
�A
i�
„s
f-
g,
i
i
f
I *Awl
♦� g
SU1- ALLS-DR _- ii r[y �r �-
1 rtr -
a
o Q
DESERT DR R-1 Q y
1 r <
RANCHO RO 2 7300 N
o7000
R •3- ` 'n• iSARBARA-^DR A �
7000 .. �0 PA K ..«. >
P- O O
tp C-P•S 0 R-2 P� ♦ N O MIMOSA DP
rr- CHPLL R_3- 96 a o
W-� rxo ,�'M axe R-2 R-�
CACTUS S� p • 7000 ARDOLEOA
�OQ S N
Im I BRUSHwooU DR R 2 R• ' O
�ul I OLORIAMA
' C-P-S CPS al ON OC O
„ aS
o y R-( o00
G NTA--R
/ ►yTYs c,o N R_1 - N o200
f SONORA OR. ' sm—NIC,
9y R.2.
7 ATA
SIERRA•VISTA RD /?�� ATAUNA
R-2-5000 R-2 'o 71
oo
R-2 2-
�• TAMPtco OR. ROALUr .
o A c-2 IN OW 1
RANCHO GRANGE
R-2-7000 _
p ^t-
N 7e <_ N
Eal
A ,
c Z. 15565 - - R-1
/ . 700(5
0 1
z l�
1 v C-K
C
i W•2
e R-2-6000 � /o
o} x
^) „
9Tq MAfq�- 3T �• �• 'b
0 \\\ ' �APf OPT
Atl f_—S C) �?q�
n `� yt�%fHO�G�ST
Y 5 0 ~ y ty) \ -
01 3p r,c (L�
{ 1' T y P F 1't K " »
'� c
F F CHARLES G. TAYLOR
N • �� I INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES
F- SALES -LEASES•INVESTMENTS
1 _ ~I *1AJVS NC IWAL;IY C0.• 6252 E.TELEGRAPH ROAD
�,�.. - '-----�----- LOS ANGELES,CAMFORNIA 9W40
r (218)685-5380
PACIFIC Rim
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD.
_ :! COMMVNI'LY PLANNERS-DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS
73-893 HIGHWAY 111
y PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
(714) 346-6041
December 4, 1974
Mr. Paul Williams, Director of
Environmental Services
CITY OF PALM DESERT
45-275 Prickly Pear Square
Palm Desert, California 92260
Subject : Palm Desert General Plan
Our File No. 73-05101
Dear Mr. Williams:
Silver Spur Associates, developer of the Ironwood Country Club project ,
has requested this office to review the public hearing draft of the
Palm Desert General Plan dated November 12, 1974, and to discuss with
your staff areas of concern that Silver Spur Associates has with certain
sections of the General Plan document as they relate to the Ironwood
project in general and to their vested interests in the Conditional Use
Permit under which the project is being developed. It is noted that
many millions of dollars have been expended toward the development of this
project to date, estimated to be in excess of twenty percent of the ult-
imate project value.
The purpose of this letter is to outline the various concerns of the
developer that we have discussed on several occasions since the draft of the
General Plan was issued on November 12, 1974, and to make specific requests
for revisions or additions to the General Plan document. Specific concerns
and requests on specific pages of the document follow.
PAGE 1 .B.4.a. (Figure 1-3 Land Use)
The Low Density (3-5 DU/Ac) is in conflict with the approved and vested
Conditional Use Permit for the Ironwood project , and as we discussed,
should be revised in Neighborhood No. 7 to Medium Density (5-7 DU/Ac) ,
similar to the neighborhood north of Haystack Road.
The Very Low Density ( 1-3 DU/Ac) is also in drastic conflict with the
approved Conditional Use Permit and existing development and should be
revised to Medium Density designation.
The City and Valley-Wide Trails through the Ironwood project and the
Living Desert Reserve are in conflict with the existing improvements
and desires of the developers of both the Living Desert Reserve and the
Ironwood project. The Ironwood project has prior to this time con-
structed golf course-related facilities in the area designated as City
page 2
Wide Trails. Such improvements include a golf clubhouse and attendant
parking lots and appurtenances, 18-Hole Championship golf course, 9-Hole
3 Par golf course, 4 Holes in the resort length golf course, driving
range facilities, golf course maintenance building and facilities, irrig-
ation lakes and appurtenances, and the like. Future construction in this
area will include completion of the resort golf course west and southwest
of the existing golf clubhouse facility and along the Dead Indian Creek
storm channel , an additional 18-Hole Championship golf course west and
southwest of the existing clubhouse facility, and residential dwelling
units immediately west of and adjacent to all golf course and related
facilities. These existing and proposed improvements (specified by the
Conditional Use Permit) will completely develop this area in question,
and will not permit the installation of bicycle, equestrian , or hiking
trails which could create a gross conflict in uses. In addition to this,
we understand that the Living Desert Reserve does not desire to have either
equestrian or hiking facilities to or through their project separate from
the interior nature trails that presently exist. It is for these reasons
that Silver Spur Associates requests that the equestrian/hiking trails
be deleted east of the equestrian center near Highway 74, and that the
proposed bicycle/golf cart trail be realigned to follow the alignment of
Portola Avenue along its entire length westerly to Highway 74, if the city
desires to have bicycle trails in this section of the city. It is noted
that the natural slope of the land at the southern edge of the city is steep
(4%-5%) , and that bicycle trails must be hard surfaced with asphalt , concrete,
or other suitable materials, making flood control channels highly impract-
icable for bicycle uses.
It is noted that a convenience commercial facility is located at the south-
east corner of Highway 74 at Portola Avenue, and that the text on Page l . B.5
indicates a location at the northeast corner of Highway 74 at Haystack Road,
which is not shown on the Land Use Map. You indicated the location at Por-
tola Avenue is correct, and that the text on Page 1 .B.5 should be revised to
indicate this location.
You indicated in our discussions that a "private recreational use" designation
was to be added to the land use designations on the Land Use Map, and that
this designation should be applied to all of the area of the Ironwood project
containing or proposed to contain golf course separate from residential
areas. It is noted that these areas are presently designated "Wildlife
Preserve" and that this inappropriate designation should be revised to indicate
private recreational use.
PAGE 2.G. l .a (Figure 1 .2 Urban Design Abstract)
The hillside and wildlife preserve and the central loop of trail systems
are discussed in the preceeding paragraphs. The developer requests that
this figure be revised to indicate a relocated trail system along the align-
ment of Portola Avenue to Highway 74, and that the hillside and wildlife
preserve designation be revised to private recreational use designation in
the golf course areas of the Ironwood project.
PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 73-893 HIGHWAY 111 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
page 3
PAGE 3.B. 6
It is noted that a convenience commercial center is indicated on several
exhibits within the General Plan at the southeast corner of Highway 74 at
Portola Avenue. The devloper neither proposes nor opposes the commercial
site at this location. However, the discussion on this page does not spec-
ify the acreage of the convenience commercial center at this location, but
does specify a general rule-of-thumb requirement of 1 .4 acres per 1 ,000
population. A projected population of 4,200 may be deduced from the required
community and neighborhood park acreages shown on Page 7.P.2.a. for Neighbor-
hood No. 7, but it is quite possible the center will serve more than this
single neighborhood. As the Ironwood project is approximately two years old,
considerable "offsite" improvements have been constructed in addition to
residential dwelling units, and as the cost of all such existing and future
improvements must be based on an ultimate number of dwelling units, the
developer requests that a specific area be assigned to this convenience
commercial center so that the project may continue in an orderly fashion.
PAGE 4. B.l .b.
The developer notes that the statistics quoted for the Ironwood Country Club
are not accurate, and should be 146 dwelling units completed, 74 dwelling units
under construction, 2946 additional units planned, and 2716 total dwelling
units (per Conditional Use Permit) . The developer requests that these stat-
istice be revised to the numbers quoted above.
PAGE 4. B.3.a.
The developer notes that the projected residential development for Neighbor-
hood No. 7, of which Ironwood project is a part, indicate 1538 dwelling units
to be constructed, and 3837 population in that neighborhood. As the Ironwood
project has 2496 additional units planned as described above, and adjacent pro-
perties are planned for 327 units per a valid Conditional Use Permit issued
to Mercury Enterprises, a minimum projection of 3043 additional dwelling units
may be expected in this neighborhood plus dwelling units to be constructed
on other vacant land in Neighborhood No. 7. For these reasons, the developer
requests that the statistics for Neighborhood No. 7 be reviewed and revised
to more reasonably reflect projected developments in this neighborhood, inclu-
ding the two approved projects described above.
PAGE 5.P. l .a. (Figure 5. 1 Highway Network)
The developer notes that the alignment of Portola Avenue is not correct and
should be revised per the location shown on the Land Use Map and other exhib-
its within the General Plan.
PAGE 5.P. 1 .b (Figure 5.2)
It is noted that with the exception of the secondary highway, the specific
dimensions indicated on this page are either in conflict with the existing
county standards or are algebraically inconsistent within themselves. The
developer notes that approximately 4,000 lineal feet of Portola Avenue has
been constructed within a 100 right-of-way per County Standards, which in-
dicate a 12' parkway between the right-of-way and the curb line on each side
PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 73-893 HIGHWAY Ill PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
page 4
of the street. The devloper requests that either this page or an item in the
text provide for the continuation of the existing improvement standards in
this case, as revision to the dimensions shown on this page would be highly
impractical , aesthetically detracting, potentially dangerous from a safety
point of view, etc. .
PAGE 5.P. 1 .c (Figure 5-3)
As described above under Land Use Map, the developer requests that the city-
wide bicycle/golf cart trail shown on this map be relocated along Portola
Avenue, and that the city-wide hiking/equestrian trails shown on this map
be deleted from the equestrian center near the existing southerly city limit
line easterly through the Ironwood project and the Living Desert Reserve.
PAGE 6.4.B.4.a (Figure 6.4-3)
As described in preceeding discussion, the developer requests that the golf
course area of the Ironwood project be removed from the hillside and wildlife
preserve designation, and be place in a private recreational use designation .
It is noted that Figure 6.4-1 correctly excludes these golf course areas from
the hillside or mountain designation.
PAGE 7.P.2.et seq.
The developer is very concerned with the implementation policies of the rec-
reation element on this and succeeding pages, in that they do not appear to
provide for planned residential developments which include extensive recreation-
al facilities for their residents in general . Specifically in the case of the
Ironwood project, this project includes some 450 acres in golf course develop-
ment and approximately 20 tennis courts and related activity facilities for the
common benefit and use of all residents within the project, which ultimately
will contain as many as 2716 separate dwelling units. In addition to these
common facilities, there are numerous local recreational facilities for each
increment of up to 20 dwelling units. These facilities include such items as
regular sized swimming pools, therapy pools, outdoor barbeque faclities , out-
door ice machines, sinks, etc. , outdoor shade structures and furniture, irrig-
ation and lighting systems, and the like. These two levels of recreational
facilities are judged to more than adequately meet the general needs of the
project residents , creating very little or no demand for formal "neighborhood"
or "community" parks with the rather deatiled variety of facilities specified
in this section. It is worth note that a canvass of the existing residents
within the Ironwood project indicates that there is an average of 0.13 school -
age children per dwelling unit among the existing residents, and that there are
no school-age children attending local schools within the project. The developer
therefore requests that some language be provided in this section of the General
Plan document to provide for adaptation of planned residential developments such
as and including the Ironwood project, which provide specific recrational fac-
ilities designed to meet the specific needs of the residents within the project.
The developer also requests that the city re-evaluate its projected need for
a significant community park containing 8.4 acres in the Neighborhood No. 7,
in the light of the age and recreation requirements of the existing and future
residents within this area. It is noted that existing developments within
Neighborhood No. 7 _include two very large mobile home parks catering primarily
PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 73-893 HIGHWAY Ill PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
page 5
to childless or retired couples, at least 5 planned residential developments
including significant self-contained recrational facilities, and a large
number of relatively expensive single family homes selling in excess of
$ 40,000, which in many cases contain their own swimming pools and house
adults without school -age children. It is noted that a recreational facility
within the Silver Spur Ranch development was abandoned and removed in the past
due to lack of use and support by the residents within the development,
indicating less than an acute demand for common recreational facilities in
this neighborhood.
The developer would sincerely appreciate your reviewing his requests as described
above relative to the proposed General Plan document, and to incorporate changes
with which you agree in your staff report to be submitted to the Planning Commiss-
ion and City Council . Representatives of the developer and this office are avail -
able on short notice to further discuss the items described above with you and
your staff at your convenience.
Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
PACIFIC RIM
D.H. Shayler
DHS/rs
Approved for Submittal
SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES
By IRONWOOD CORPORATION, Managing Partner
By
V i ce-Pr+i den t
PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 73-893 HIGHWAY 111 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
-OC
PALM DESERT 1".1"ZOPERTY 0WNj11J%)S ?�":) IA ION
N.O. BOX 124.1 PALM DESUTT, CALIFORNIA 92200
Tiu_1,wnoNm (714) 3,(,2804
A Non-Profit Carlcration
T T
r Cit
C,t I t C
p(ZI,I
Cent
Th-e oF tlic_, alm, AF�soc; _
ation t a s eC1a MC P t i I I n s a v c em'D r t t 11971i
resolution .
ESOT
a r f,e me. 3 r-i of t hr, re of a r,-i esert
T-)7rsona11__,!, anA/or t1 rcu'7l,, those to rr> )re7,�nt at
)ubl--* c adlvise,' _sQv anc: consul-tants for t i,,f�
o Teri 1.1 p -
C, r e t �)'e
Si,r -it th-,,7 Lo 't al
- - - 1 - C?S 3('n
I TL.2I1
res Ident ia�' - 'v 'a7j;-i
t n s
L 'j L _1-1 arl -omm r c i t Ti as r S'i re ta
rota"TI-1 t;"p sar " ai-T.-
has ma'1 L 7, De F,('r t r-,o-d s' .
i'le r a D l -
U 1 0,-, 4 + r, r'.,rl C!
L L a.i a S
;p r c-r)a
_n
i . T v e M t-, / o- Cjr,t E C) 4- s al?_ r n o +a r L S h 0 T-)7 C e- r 7' for th�, 2ntirc
y in -present incorno rate d ,rc-a Of lm T,�sE!r t .
2 . Fe j,,Lo v2 al-, -,'e �ere" i", 1 n"Ce maps and 7,�-)0 r t in the pr��sent
.r - -,
I � al m F,(2 r t C) c co l: e
c or7 o r a r,a "a!,,,t e s e r or. L
th:, central icur'Ls t arF-ci for t1he entire Val l(7 with I a
convention tv-'? `lotels .
3 . the T-)r:.2 S;7, 4-
o r C,' 'a-f-, -2 t re lovef r o T.-!
L _t ar., o Palm :�eser
f) s.4 tIv ( 7 o 12 t c a c rn?) " a I-i d
-qp u',
e d i u m P e 1-3 t o 7 to the ac-ro ) " leavinc- th-
density ^ 3 to to the acre no'I- descril'),_d, in the. rr por,T_
as
"Low Dens- ITL-,
4 . Set heif.-ht jimits on ro-si-1,1--ritial units tc, a riaximun, of 157
feet and on commercial U',,,� t-S to �j
L of 21; feet .
5 . Chan 21.1 class,* 4ri cat i c_)n a.-.,,, .70ni.-17 in the Consultants maT)s
*
and plans for the future of Palm r)esert to conform to the
above .
Very t r u]-,,7
E,a r 1b, i r a e yn,n!_�
I
Secretary