HomeMy WebLinkAboutZOA 08-81 SIGNS 1981 TO: CITY 14ANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
I
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68. 310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
�xaMV/
FL oT I = LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 1
( I
I I
:
• Business
1 2 3 4 5
L6
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
�xant�� no. 2
Business
1 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
exasnpGe ne. 3
F
Business 3
1 2
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
businesses are located on a parcel this person gets nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 -because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because .it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square foot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04.190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided .on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68. 310 *to read• Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
�r
A
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68.310 (Cont'd)
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed fifty square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign. conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68.310 as in effect on September 25, 1981., shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision to Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two or more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities -in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.68.260 One Sign Per Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial .and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote compatibility,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness" .
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
t n m o to pen �al 'z e those who have complied with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, 1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City' s current
sign regulations.
ORDINANCE NO. 272
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, .APPROVING AN AMENDMENT ,
TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT, RELATIVE TO CHAPTER
25 . 68 CONCERNING THE REGULATION OF SIGNS.
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert , California,
-- did on September 24:,. 1981 and October 8 , 1981, hold a dii1v noticed Public
Hearing to consider an amendment of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to
the regulation of signs , Municipal Code Chapter 25 . 68 ; and
WHEREAS , the Planning Commission, by Resolution No. 738 has
recommended approval ; and '
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements
of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California
Environmental Quality Act , Resolution No. 80-89" , in that the Director
of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have
a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declara-
tion has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering
all testimony and arguments , if any, of all persons desiring to be heard,
said City Council did find the following facts and reasons to exist to
approve a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment :
1 . That the Zoning Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the
objectives of the Zoning Ordinance.
2. That the Zoning Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the
adopted General- Plan.
3 . That the Zoning Ordinance Amendment would better serve the
public health, safety and general welfare, than the current
regulations .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Palm Desert, as follows :
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and consti-
tute the considerations of the Council in this case.
2. That it does hereby approve a Zoning Ordinance Text Amend-
ment, as provided 'in the attached exhibit, labeled Exhibit
"A" , to amend Municipal Code Chapter 25. 68.
3 . The City Clerk is directed to publish this ordinance once
in the Palm Desert Post , a newspaper of general circulation,
published and circulated in the City of Palm Desert , and
shall certify to the passage of adoption of this ordinance,
and the same shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm
Desert City Council, held on this 27nd day of 1981, by the
following vote , to wit :
AYES: McPherson, Newbrander, Puluoi, Snyder & Wilson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
S OYWILSON, 1.!
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GIf IGAN, CIr CLERK
CITY OF PALM DESERT, ALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 272 Page two
EXHIBIT "A"
i
25 . 68 . 150 22 en House Si ns . During the period under which
real estate is o ered or sa e or lease and while a salesperson is
physically present on the premises , one sign per street frontage not
exceeding four feet in height and three square feet in area shall be
permitted.
Off-site directional signs may be permitted for an open house, subject
to the following provisions :
A. Each sign shall not exceed three (3) square feet;
B. No flags or banners shall be used;
C. To be located on private property only, unless prior written
approval for unique circumstances is obtained from the Director
of Environmental Services .
25 . 68 . 615 Open Summer Signs . Between June 1st and October 1st,
restaurants , retail and personal service businesses within the commercial
zone may display a sign in addition to a main sign, not to exceed five (5)
square feet, indicating if they will remain open during the summer. The
design and location of the sign shall be compatible with other signs on
the building and must be approved by the Department of Environmental
Services .
25. 68 . 335 Restaurant Menu Boards . In addition to those signs
permitted by this title, a restaurant may mount a sign on a wall or
window, not to exceed three (3) square feet displaying the menu and/or
daily specials . When a restaurant is set back more than five (5) feet
from the public right-of-way or pedestrian walkway, a freestanding easel
may be set up within the setback to display the menu board during hours
when meals are being served. Said sign may not encroach into the public
right-of-way or obstruct pedestrian movement .
25 . 68. 590 Land Subdivision Signs . Signs advertising land sub-
divisions shall be limited to :
A. One double faced sign per frontage not to exceed forty (40)
square feet per face or two single faced signs , forty square
feet per face per frontage.
B. Two 15 square foot on-site directional signs per street
frontage shall be permitted. Said signs shall direct persons
to the subdivision entrance.
C. Said signs shall be non-illuminated.
25 . 68 . 270 Si n Area - Commercial and Industrial Uses . Sign design,
location and size sha 1 be as approved by the Design Review Process .
Relative thereto, the following sign areas shall apply:
A. Businesses within one hundred feet of a public right-of-way
which they face, or businesses which front only on a common
use parking area shall be entitled to one square foot of sign
per lineal foot of frontage, unless the Design Review Board
determines that the proposed size of the sign is not in
harmony with the design of the building. Such a sign must be
located adjacent to the right-of-way from which its area is
determined.
B. Businesses located greater than 100 feet from a public right-
of-way, which they face, shall be entitled to 12 square foot
of sign per lineal foot of frontage, unless the Design Review
Board determines that the proposed size of the sign is not
in harmony with the design of the building. Such a sign must
be located adjacent to the right-of-way from which its area is
determined.
C. A single business having lineal frontage on any right-of-way
in excess of fifty feet, shall be entitled in addition to
subsections A or B, an additional one-half square foot of
ORDINANCE NO. 272 '
EXHIBIT "A" (Continued Page four
25 . 68 . 130 Realty Signs . During a period of time when realty is
offere for sale or rent , a sign so indicating , not to exceed 3 square
feet and four feet in height may be located on the property facing each
frontage. No real estate sign shall be located on a roof; project from
a building face; or, move in any manner. Any such sign shall be removed ,
upon rental of the property, or upon close of escrow. In addition, one
rider not to exceed five inches by sixteen inches may be installed at
the bottom of the main sign.
Amend Section 25 .-68 . 310 to read: Freestanding Signs .
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size
and location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council.
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
C . The area of such signs shall not exceed fifty square feet per
face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way. `
E. Any freestanding sign conforming to the requirements of J
Section 25. 68.310 as in effect on September 25 , 1981 , shall
be considered exempted from these provisions until such time
as the owner changes his sign copy.
25 . 68 . 395 BuildiY�g or Buildin Com lex Identification Signs In The
Genera Commercia District. In addition to the wall sign area allowe
for individual businesses , general commercial district buildings or
building complexes which are designed to contain four or more distinct
tenant spaces , may be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-way,
or public access thoroughfare. Such signs shall not extend beyond the
property line or into the right-of-way or thoroughfare, and shall be used
solely to identify the building or building complex. Relative to such
signs , the maximum allowable sign area shall be based on the following:
A. Up to 50 feet of frontage, three (3) square feet of sign area.'
B. Over 50 feet of frontage , up to 75 feet, five (5), square feet
of sign area.
C. Over 75 feet of frontage, up to 100 feet, ten (10) square feet
of sign area.
D. Over 100 feet of frontage, maximum size of 15 square feet.
Buildings with frontage of 100 feet or more shall be permitted a free-
standing sign, height not to exceed 8 ' .
25 . 68 .480_Sign_Colors . The number and type of colors used shall
be as approved by the Design Review Board.
25 . 68 . 290 Frontage Parking Lots . Delete
Add to Section 25 . 04. 190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more busi-
nesses shown on a common Deveiopment Fian, Flot Vian, or Precise Plan
of design functioning as a unit , with common off-street parking provided
on the property as an integral part of the unit .
ORDINANCE NO. 272 Page three
EXHIBIT "A" (continued)
sign area for each lineal foot of frontage in excess of fifty
feet up to one hundred feet, and an additional one quarter
square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of frontage in
excess of a hundred feet .
25 . 68 . 290 Alternative Sign Area Allocation For Small Commercial
Complexes . Owners of multi-tenant buildings or commercial complexes ,
may divide the total sign area allocated to the building street frontage
(per Section 25 . 68 . 270) among the various tenants to allow tenants not
having street frontage to have signage on said street.
Said signs must meet all other requirements of this chapter.
25 . 68 . 390 Signs in District and Regional Shopping Centers and
Industrial Par s . In addition to the wall sign area allowed for indivi-
ual businesses , shopping centers and industrial parks in excess of three
and one-half acres of land shall be allowed one identification sign on
each right-of-way. Such signs shall not extend beyond the property line
or into the right-of-way and shall be used solely to identify the shopping
center, shopping area, or businesses and/or activities conducted therein.
Relative to such signs , the allowable sign area shall be based ' on ten
square feet of sign per acre. These signs shall not exceed one hundred
square feet , shall have a maximum height of twelve feet , and shall not
be erected 'without first having proper approval as provided in this
chapter.
Further , where the unique design of the center allows for adequate in-
tegration of a larger sign, the permitted pedestrian traffic signs as
allowed in Section 25 . 68 . 330 may be increased to a maximum of Six square
feet per side.
25. 68 .400' Sales and Rental Signs .
A. Commercial and industrial properties shall be authorized sale
or rental signs on the following basis :
1. Under 200 feet of frontage on a public road, one sign per
frontage, 3 square feet per sign.
2. Over 200 feet of frontage on a public right-of-way, one
sign per frontage, twelve square feet in area.
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satisfactory
to the Director of Environmental Services . Such signs shall
be removed upon completion of escrow.
25 . 68. 250 Sales and Rental Signs (Other Residential Zones) .
A. Properties in residential zones other than single family shall
be authorized sale or rental signs on the following basis :
1. Under 200 feet of street frontage, one sign per frontage,
3 square feet per sign.
2. Over 200 feet of street frontage, one sign per frontage,
twelve square feet in area.
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satisfactory
to the Director of Environmental Services . Such signs shall
be removed upon completion of escrow.
25 . 68. 350 Special Event Signs . With the approval of the Director
of Environmental Services , a business may erect one temporary sign,
mounted on a wall facia or freestanding, advertising special events ,
promotions or sales . The Director may approve up to 30 square feet of
sign area depending upon the type of event , building design and right-of-
way frontage for a period not to exceed 30 days per year. When improperly
used, special event signs constitute a public nuisance and may be abated.
_ i
g
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68. 310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
6x4 pl no.1
FLoT I � LOT 2 • ' LOT 3 �•N LOT 4 � LOT 5 1
I I
I I
• Business
• 1 2 3 4 5
r
..• .N
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
N. N.
r
Business
I 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
-- L��rasnpC no. 3
I
3
Business
I 2
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
businesses are located on a parcel this person gets nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square foot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04.190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided .on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68.310 'to read: Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity; size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68. 310 (Cont'd)
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed -fifty square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign. conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68.310 as in effect on September 25, 1981 , shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision to Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two or more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.68.260 One Sign Per Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote compatibility,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness".
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to penalize those who have complied with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, 1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City' s current
sign regulations.
7 �( /
MEMO
CITY OF PALM DESERT
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM : DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
SUBJECT: SIGN ORDINANCE DATE : SEPTEMBER 25 , 1981
Attached is the updated "Proposed-Existing" Sign Ordinance staff
report .
NOTE : Staff is working on rewording the freestanding sign
provisions and will present this at the next meeting.
t
RAM, DI Z
r
1
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY - SEPTEMBER 1, 1981
7:00 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I. CALL TO ORDER
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission was
called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Miller in the City Hall Council
Chambers.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Commissioner Richards
III. ROLL CALL
Members Present: Commissioner Kryder
Commissioner Richards
Commissioner Wood
Chairman Miller
Excused Absent: Commissioner Berkey
Staff Present: Ramon Diaz, Director of Environmental Services
Stan Sawa, Principal Planner
`Steve Smith, Associate Planner
Phil Drell , Assistant Planner
Linda Russell , Planning Secretary
Others Present: Barry McClellan, Director of Public Works
Eric Vogt, Fire Marshal
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 19, 1981
Motion was made by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Richards,
to approve the minutes as submitted. Carried (4-0).
V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION
Mr. Diaz reviewed the actions of the Council for the meeting of August
27, 1981.
VI . PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Continued Case No. ZOA 08-81 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant
Consideration of an amendment to Municipal Code, Chapter
25.68, concerning regulation of signs.
Mr. Drell reviewed the revisions made to the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amend-
ment from the last meeting.
On the subject of, sign design, location and size, Commission noted that the
proposed revisions did not reflect their comments from the last meeting, August 19.
Mr. Diaz explained that staff had chosen this alternative to give Design
Review Board the ability to grant a maximum of one square foot of sign area per
lineal foot of frontage, if circumstances are warranted.
Commissioner Richards felt that applicants are entitled to the one square
foot of sign area per lineal foot of frontage and that the Design Review Board
should not have the ability to deny this. Commissioner Kryder agreed.
Commission also felt that since Design Review Board does have the right to
asses the aesthetic value of signs; they should still substantiate their findings.
i
uoL;P;uasaad P alpw 04
pa.APo ;UPOLLddp ayg jL paJSP pue 6ULaPOH OLLgnd ayq pauado .AaLLLW UPwaLegD
• LenoaddP papuawwooaa pup gaodaa j}pgs ayq paMaLAaa LLaaO 'aW
•aALaa UOAPy.ALPj Put? aALaa MaLA �aPd �O aauaoO gsea
-4gnos ayq gP pagPOOL auoz 'd'S L-M Pup 'd'S (L) Z-a ayq
UL41LM saaOP Z•E Uo PaaP uowwoO PUP saxaLdnp qq ;o UOL;
-onj4 suoo ayq MOLLP o; ;oedwl Le4UawuoaLAu3 }o UOL;PaPLoaa
0AL4P6aN pup dew ;Opa; aAL;e;Uaq 40L L e 40 UOL;PaapLsuOO
;uPoLLddV "ONI 'Sa3OIIng NVWJJOH `NVWJJOH 30W - LZ08I 11 'ON aSPO •3
' (O-b) A'LsnowLuPun PaL.AJR3 •guawpuawe ayq oq goaCqns
';Lwaad asn LPUOL;IPU03 ayq 6ULAoaddP `6£L 'ON UOLgnLOsaa UOLSSLwwoO 6ULUUPLd gdopP oq
'aepsiN aauOLsSLwwoO A'q papuooas 'spaPgDLa JaUOLSSLwwo3 Fq apew seM uOLIOW
'(0-b) PaLaaP3 •S6ULpULJ 3}P4s ;dope
04 `spaP40La aaUOLSSLwwOO A'q papuooas `aaPRA� aauOLSSLwwoO Fq apPw SPM UOL;OW
•paSOLo seM 6ULaeaH OLLgnd ayq 'auoU 6uLaq aaa41 •asPO SL4g 04
NOIlISOddO ao WAVJ uL leads og paysLM guasaad auOSUP �L palsP AaLLM UewaLe43
• LPAoaddp pa;sanbaa pup
SUOLSLAaa S,Ijpgs 4;LM paaanouoo aH - M 4UapLSaa ueyq aa44ea asn 30LI40 Aoj pajLns
as;gaq sL Paae ayq gey; gLaJ ' LLPa1 -AO
goadsoad PLO IOC-bL 'UO03H N08 'aW
•UOLgP;uasaad P alpw og
paapo ;UeOLLddp ayq }L palse pup 6ULaPaH oLLgnd ayg pauado aaLLLW UPWJL240
• LPAoaddP
papuawwooaa };e;S „ •IuawaaAbV ssaooV LengnW a apLAoad LLLM ;UeOLLddp ayl„ :peaa og
'ET 'ON UOL;LpuoO 04 a6UP43 P pa;ou pup ;aodaa jjp4S ay; paMaLAaa 44iwS •aW
•aALaa oapUPssaLV OLO-bL
PUP 8fO-bL gP pa;PooL BSA DOL440 LPUOLssaJOad 0; auoz
E-b ay; uLy;LM s4Lun 6uLLLaMP RLLwP; a 0uLs Z 10 UOLS
-aanuoO ayq MOLLP 04 dno a Aoj gsanbaa P jo UoL;PaaPLSUOD
;UPDLLddV ` LP qa A2l0 R9 OIVNH - 18-90 dno 'ON aseO •8
' (0-b) PaLaaP3 •anoge apew sa6uego ayq o; goaCqns ' LLounoO 4;L3
ayg og LPAoaddP 6ULpuawwo3aa '8£C 'ON UOLgnLosaa UOLSSLwwOO 6ULUUPLd gdope oq
'aaPSJN AaUOLSSLWWOO Sq papuooas 'spaPg3Lb ADUOLSSLWWOD A'q apew SPA UOL40W
•pasOLO SPM 6ULJP94 oLLgnd a4; `NOIlISOUO aO HOAV3 UL au0u 6uLaq aaayl
aouaLpnP ay; woa} ;nduL ao; pejsP pue 6uLaPaH oLLgnd ayq pauado aaLILW uPwaLeyO
„PaPULosaa„ oq „PapUa4Xa„ woa3 a6Upy3
'.paOM gseL 'ydea6eaPd puooas !SU6LS asnOH uado 109I•89•SE UOL;oaS aapun ;e4; pagou
zPLO •aW •paaanouoo UOLSSLwwOO pue SUOLSLAaa aapULPwaa a44 paMaLAaa LLaaa •aW
•UOLSLAaa SL4; oq paaa6e UOLsSLwwoO
•a6P4uoa; 10 4001 LPaULL aad u6Ls 40 gaaj aapnbs JLPy-auo PUP auo 04 P@ Mlua
aq LLLM FeM-10-446La oLLgnd e woad gaaJ OOT uP44 aa4Paa6 pa;POOL SassaULsnq asoyq
ao;gda0xa V Se awes ay; peaa pLnoM) 8 aapua I„bULPLLnq ay; ;O U6LSap ay; 44Lm A'UOW
-aPy UL 4OU SL u6Ls ayg 10 azLS pasodoad ayq 4e4; saULWU@Jap paeo8 MaLAaa U6LS9O ayq
ssaLun 'a6P4uoa; 3o 4001 LeaULL aad u6Ls ;O ;aaj aaenbs auo o; paL;L;ua aq LLP4s PaaP
6U13aPd asn Uowwoo P Uo A'LUO ;UO,A; gDLgM sassaULsnq a0 'a3P3 A'ay; g314M RPM-3o-446LU
oLLgnd P }o qaa; paapuny auo ULy;LM SassaULsnB„-V aapU� :PPaa o; paSLAaa aq OLZ'89'SZ
UOLgoaS ge44 pa;sa66ns zPLO •aW Aa4;Pw SLy; uo UOLssnoSLp aay;an; aa;}V
( 'guOO) SONIM H OI10nd 'IA
OM1 abed I861 'I 638W31d3S
NOISSIWWOO 9NINNVId 1a3S3O WIVd
S31nNIW
l
CITY OF PALM DESERT
STAFF REPORT
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT ON: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
APPLICANT: CITY OF PALM DESERT
CASE NO: ZOA 08-81
DATE: SEPTEHBER 1 , 1981
I. REQUEST:
Amendment to Municipal Code, Chapter 25.68 concerning regulation of signs.
II. BACKGROUND:
A. CASE INITIATION:
This amendment was initiated by the Planning Commission by minute
motion July 15, 1981 .
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the proposed
amendments are a Class 5, categorical exemption for purposes of CEQA.
III. DISCUSSION:
These proposed sign ordinance amendments were the result of discussions
with individual merchants, the Chamber of Commerce, Board of Realtors, the
Design Review Board and the general public. The changes are designed to
increase sign effectiveness while retaining necessary design controls.
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS:
A. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.150 to read:
OPEN HOUSE SIGNS. During the period under.which real estate is offered
for sale or lease and while a salesperson is physically present on the
premises, one sign per street frontage not exceeding four feet in height
and three square feet in area shall be permitted.
Two on-site real estate flags per street not to exceed 6 feet in height nor dimensions
of 18" x 30" shall be permitted. (This flag provision shall be reviewed by Planning
Commission 6 months after adoption by City Council and shall report on any problems.
If deemed appropriate, the provision shall be rescinded).
Off-site directional signs may be permitted for an open house, subject
to the following provisions:
A. Each sign shall not exceed three (3) square feet;
B. No flags or banners shall be used;
C. To be located on private property only, unless prior written
approval for unique circumstances is obtained from the Director
of Environmental Services.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.150 Open house signs. During the period under
which real estate is offered for sale or lease and while a salesperson
is physically present on the premises , a sign indicating open house shall
be permitted. The sign shall not exceed three square feet in area ; and
if located on a pole, no part of the sign or pole shall exceed four feet
above ground level . One off-site directional sign may be permitted for
an open house, subject to the following provisions:
A. It shall not exceed three square feet;
B. No flags or banners shall be used;
C. To be located on private property only;
D. Limited to one sign only. (Ord. 129 §4(part) , 1977: Ord.98 51 (part)
1975: Exhibit A 525.38-10.03) .
.STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA_0_8-81 PAGE TWO _
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: , (CONTINUED)
CHANGE: 1 . Allows one sign per street frontage instead of only
one sign.
2. Allows for two flags per street frontage, none
presently allowed.
B. (NEW) 25.68.615 to read:
OPEN SUMMER SIGNS - Between June 1st and October lst, restaurants,
retail and personal service businesses within the commercial zone
may display a sign in addition to a main sign, not to exceed five
(5) square feet, indicating if they will remain open during the
summer. The design and location of the sign shall be compatible with
9
other signs on the building and must be approved by the Department
of Environmental Services.
CHANGE: Presently additional signs are prohibited.
C. (NEW) 25.68.335 to read:
RESTAURANT MENU BOARDS - In addition to those .signs permitted by
this title, a restaurant may mount a sign on a wall or window, not
to exceed three (3) square feet displaying the menu and or daily
specials. When a restaurant is set back more than five (5) feet from
the public right-of-way or pedestrian walkway, a freestanding easel
may be set up within the setback, to display the menu board during
hours when meals are being served. Said sign may not encroach into
the public right-of-way or obstruct pedestrian movement.
CHANGE: Present ordinance prohibits wall mounted or freestanding
signs for menu display purposes.
D. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.590 to read:
LAND SUBDIVISION SIGNS - Signs advertising land subdivisions shall be
limited to:
A. One double faced sign per frontage not to
exceed forty (40) square feet per face or
two single faced signs, forty square feet
per face per frontage.
B. Two 15 square foot on-site directional signs
per street frontage shall be permitted. Said
signs shall direct persons to the subdivision
entrance.
r (EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.590 Land subdivision signs. Signs advertising
land subdivisions shall be limited to one double-faced sign of thirty-
two square feet per side, placed at a right angle to the street or two
thirty-two-square-foot signs facing the street. Such signs shall be at
least two hundred feet apart and shall be placed upon the subdivision.
Such signs shall be removed at the end of two years or when the sub-
division is sold, whichever occurs first.CThese_ signs shall not be
t illuminated. (Ord. 129 S4(part) , 1977: Or 98 §1 (part),1975: Exhibit
A §25.38-17.03))
1
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
AUGUST 19, 1981 PAGE THREE
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (CONTINUED)
CHANGES: 1 . Increases present allowable size by 8 square feet.
2. Allows one sign per street abutting subdivision
instead of one per developer.
3. Allows additional on site directional signs of
15 square feet in size.
4. Permits Pennants which were previously prohibited.
E. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.270 to read:
25.68.270 Sign Area - Commercial and Industrial Uses. Sign design, location
and size shall be as approved by the Design Review Process. Relative thereto, the
following sign areas shall apply:
A. Businesses within one hundred feet of a public right-of-way which
they face, or businesses which front only on a common use parking
area shall be entitled to one square foot of sign per lineal
foot of frontage, unless the Design Review Board determines that
the proposed size of the sign is not in harmony with the design of
the building. Such a sign must be located adjacent to the right-
of-way from which its area is determined.
B. Businesses located greater than 100 feet from a public right-of-way,
which they face, shall be entitled to 12 square foot of sign per
lineal foot of frontage, unless the Design Review Board determines
that the proposed size of the sign is not in harmony with the
design of the building. Such a sign must be located adjacent to
the right-of-way from which its area is determined.
C. A single business having lineal frontage on any right-of-way
in excess of fifty feet, shall be entitled in addition to
subsections A or B, an additional one-half square, foot of
sign area for each lineal foot of frontage in excess of fifty
feet up to one hundred feet, and an additional one quarter
square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of frontage
in excess of a hundred feet.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25 68 270 Sign Area-Commercial and industrial uses.
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each separate business
shall be limited to one main sign integrated into the design of the
building. Relative thereto, the following sign areas shall apply:
A. The total or aggregatearea of a main sign for any
business in a building located within one hundred feet of the right-of-
way upon which it faces shall not exceed the equivalent of one square
foot of sign area per lineal foot of frontage which the building has
facing on a right-of-way or parking lot. Except as otherwise provided
in this chapter, such sign shall have a surface area no greater than
fifty square feet. No such signs shall be closer than ten feet from
any other sign permitted under this chapter. Such a sign must be
located adjacent to the right-of-way or parking lot from which its
maximum allowable size is determined.
B. The total aggregate area for a main sign for any
business in a building located one hundred feet or more from any right-of-
way upon which it faces shall not exceed the equivalent of one and one-
half square feet of sign area per lineal foot of frontage which the build-
ing has facing on a public right-of-way or parking lot. Except as provided
in this chapter, such signs shall have a surface area no greater than
seventy-five square feet. No such sign shall be closer than ten feet to
any other sign permitted under this chapter. Such a sign must be located
adjacent to the right-of-way or parking lot from which its maximum allowable
size is determined.
STAFF REPORT PAGE FOUR
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (CONTINUED)
C. A single business having a lineal frontage or any
right-of-way in excess of fifty feet may be allowed, in addition to sub-
sections A or B, an additional one square foot of sign area for each two
feet of frontage in excess of such fifty feet up to one hundred feet, and
an additional one square foot of sign area for each four feet of frontage
in excess of one hundred feet. (Ord. 129 §4 (part) , 1977: Ord. 98 51 (part) ,
1975: Exhibit A 525.38-12.01 ) .
CHANGES: 1 . Deletes requirements that signs be ten feet apart.
2. Allows Design Review Board to approve more than one
main sign.
F. (PROPOSED) Delete 25.68.290 Frontage Parking Lots. (This Section has
been incorporated with 25.68.270.
G. (NEW) 25.68.290 to read:
ALTERNATIVE SIGN AREA ALLOCATION FOR SMALL COMMERCIAL COMPLEXES - Owners
of multi-tenant buildings or commercial complexes, may divide the total
sign area allocated to the building street frontage (per section 25.68.270)
among the various tenants to allow tenants not having street frontage to
have signage on said street.
Said signs must meet all other reuqirements of this chapter.
CHANGE: Presently only businesses with street frontage are allowed
main signs on the frontage.
H. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.390 to read:
SIGNS IN DISTRICT AND REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS AND INDUSTRIAL PARKS -
In addition to the wall sign area allowed for individual businesses,
shopping centers and industrial parks in excess of three and one-half
acres of land shall be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-
way. Such signs shall not extend beyond the property line or into the
right-of-way and shall be used solely to identify the shopping center,
shopping area, or businesses and/or activities conducted therein. Relative
to such signs, the allowable sign area shall be based on ten square feet
of sign per acre. These signs shall not exceed one hundred square feet,
shall have a maximum height of twelve feet, and shall not be erected with-
out first having proper approval as provided in this chapter.
Further, where the unique design of the center allows for adequate
integration of a larger sign, the permitted pedestrian traffic signs
as allowed in Section 25.68.330 may be increased to a maximum of six
square feet per side.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.390 Signs in district and regional shopping
centers. In addition to the wall sign area allowed for individual
businesses, shopping centers in excess of three and one-half acres of
land shall be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-way.
Such signs shall not extend beyond the property line or into the right-
of-way and shall be used solely to identify the shopping center, shopping
area, or businesses and/or activities conducted therein. Relative to
such signs, the allowable sign area shall be based on five square feet
of sign per acre. These signs shall not exceed twenty-five square feet,
shall have a maximum height of eight feet, and shall not be erected
without first having proper approval as provided in this chapter.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE FIVE
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (CONTINUED)
Further, where the unique design of the center allows
for adequate integration of a larger sign, the permitted pedestrian
traffic signs as allowed in Section 25.68.330 may be increased to a
maximum of six square feet per side. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord. 98
§l (part, 1975: Exhibit A §25.38-12.12) .
CHANGES: A. Increases size from 5 square feet to 10 square feet
per acre and the maximum from 25 square feet to one
hundred square feet.
B. Increases maximum height from 8 feet to 12 feet.
I. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.400 to read:
SALE AND RENTAL SIGNS
A. Commercial and industrial properties shall be authorized
sale or rental signs on the following basis:
1 . Under 200 feet of frontage on a public road, one sign
per frontage, 3 square feet per sign.
2. Over 200 feet of frontage on a public right of way,
one sign per frontage, twelve square feet in area.
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satis-
factory to the director of envirnomental services.
Such signs shall be removed upon completion of escrow.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.400 Sale and rental signs.
A. Commercial and industrial properties shall be authorized
sale or rental signs on the following basis:
1 . Under two and one-half acres, one sign;
2. Over two and one-half acres, but less than five
acres, two signs;
3. Over five acres, one sign per street frontage.
B. These signs shall not exceed three square feet in area
or four feet in height and shall be designed and located in a manner
satisfactory to the director of environmental services. Such signs shall
be removed upon completion of excrow. (Ord. 129 S4(part) , 1977: Ord. 98
Sl (part) , 1975: Exhibit A S25.38-12.13).
CHANGES: Allows all properties one sign per frontage and increases
the sign area for larger parcels from 3 square feet to 12
square feet.
J. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.250 to read:
SALE AND RENTAL SIGNS (OTHER RESIDENTIAL ZONES)
A. Properties in residential zones other than single
family shall be authorized sale or rental signs on the following basis:
1 . Under 200 feet of street frontage, one sign per
frontage, 3 square feet per sign.
2. Over 200 feet of street frontage, one sign per
frontage, twelve square feet in area.
1
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE SIX
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: (CONTINUED)
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satis-
factory to the director of environmental services. Such signs shall be
removed upon completion of escrow.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.250 Sale and rental signs. Uses in residential
zones other than single-family zones shall be authorized one for-sale
or rent sign while the property is actually for sale or rent. Those
signs shall not exceed three square feet in area or four feet in height
and shall be designed and located in a manner satisfactory to the director
of environmental services. All such signs shall be removed upon the rental
of the property or upon the completion of escrow. In addition, one rider
not to exceed five inches by sixteen inches may be installed at the
bottom of any approved real estate sign. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord.
98 51 (part) , 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-11 .07).
CHANGES: Allows all properties one sign per frontage and increases the
sign area for larger parcels from 3 square feet to 12 square
feet.
K. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.350 to read:
I
SPECIAL EVENT SIGNS - With the approval of the Director of Environmental
Services, a business may erect one temporary sign, mounted on a wall;
facia or freestanding, advertizing special events, promotions or sales.
The Director may approve up to 30 square feet of sign area depending
upon the type of event, building design and right-of-way frontage for
a period not to exceed 30 days per year. When improperly used, special
event signs constitute a public nuisance and may be abated.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.350 Sale signs. While a sale of goods or ser-
vices is being conducted, one sale sign shall be allowed, located on
the inside of the window. Such a sign shall be in addition to the total
authorized sign area but shall not exceed ten square feet. When improperly
used, sale signs constitute a public nuisance and may be abated as such.
(Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord 98 51 (part) , 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-12.08) .
CHANGE: Presently temporary signs other than grand opening signs
are limited to 10 square feet within window areas.
L. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.130 to read:
REALTY SIGNS - During a period of time when realty is offered for sale
or rent, a sign so indicating, not to exceed 3 square feet and four feet
in height may be located on the property facing each frontage. No real
estate sign shall be located on a roof, project from a building face or
move in any manner. Any such signs shall be removed upon rental of the
property, or upon close of escrow. In addition, one rider not to exceed
five inches by sixteen inches may be installed at the bottom of the main
sign.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.130 Realty Signs. During a period of time
when realty is offered for sale or rent, a sign so indicating, but
not exceeding three square feet in area or four feet in height, may
be located on the property. No real estate signs shall be located on
a roof, project from a building face, or move in any manner. Any such
signs shall be removed upon the rental of the property, or upon the
completion of excrow. After February 24, 1977, no person engaged in
the real estate business as a broker, salesman, or otherwise, shall
use or place signs on property being offered for sale or lease unless
the sign program has first received approval from the director of
environmental services. Prior to requesting approval of any real
estate signs , evidence of a valid city business license shall be
provided. In addition, one rider, not to exceed five inches by six-
teen inches, may be installed at the bottom of any approved real
estate sign. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord. 98 51 (part) , 1975: Exhibit
A 825.38-10.01 ).
�i
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE SEVEN
CHANGE: 1 . Allows a sign on each frontage.
2. Requirement for each sign to have department of
Environmental Services approval and its own
sticker has been deleted.
M. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.310 to read:
FREESTANDING SIGNS. A building or commercial complex within the General
Commercial zone with individual street frontage of 100 feet or more, shall
be entitled to one single or double faced freestanding sign per frontage,
/ 15 square feet per face for purposes of identification of its tenants.
The total signage, freestanding and wall mounted, on a particular frontage
s shall not exceed the maximum allowable area set forth in Section 25.68.270.
On a double faced sign only one face shall be considered. The signs shall
not exceed 8 feet in height or 5 feet in width and shall be located within
a landscaped area not less than 25 square feet and shall not°encroach into
the public right-of-way.
Design and location of the signs shall be approved by the Director of
Environmental Services, Design Review Board or Planning Commission as set
forth in Sign Permit Procedures Section 25.68.030.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.310 Freestanding signs. Except as otherwise provided
in this chapter, freestanding signs shall be prohibited on a single parcel
of property where ther is more than one business.
Where authorized for a signle business, a freestanding sign shall not be
located on the public right-of-way and shall not exceed twelve feet in
height. The size of the freestanding sign shall not exceed the limitations
of Section 25.68.270 and shall be in lieu of any wall signs. (Ord. 129 54
(part) , 1977: Ord. 98 51 (part) , 1975: Exhibit A §25.38-12.03 (B) .
CHANGES: 1 . Allows one freestanding business identification sign
per frontage for multi-tenant properties with street
frontage of 100 feet or more. Presently freestanding
signs are restricted to single tenant properties except
for purposes of building or complex identification.
2. Establishes maximum sign area at 15 square feet. Presently
freestanding business ideentification sign area is
calculated using the same standards as wall mounted signs.
3. Reduces height of signs from 12 feet to 8 feet.
N. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.395 to read:
BUILDING OR BUILDING COMPLEX IDENTIFICATION SIGNS IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT. In addition to the wall sign area allowed for individual businesses,
general commercial district buildings or building complexes which are designed
to contain four or more distinct tenant spaces, may be allowed one identi-
fication sign on each right-of-way, or public access thoroughfare. Such
signs shall not extend beyond the property line or into the right-of-way or
thoroughfare, and shall be used solely to identify the building or building
complex. Relative to such signs, the maximum allowable sign area shall be
based on the following:
1 . Up to 50 feet of frontage, three (3) square
feet of sign area.
2. Over 50 feet of frontage, up to 75 feet, five (5)
square feet of sign area.
3. Over 75 feet of frontage, up to 100 feet, ten (10)
square feet of sign area.
4. Over 100. feet of frontage, maximum size of 15 square
feet.
Buildings with frontage of 100 feet or more shall be permitted a freestanding
sign, height not to exceed 8' .
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE EIGHT
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (CONTINUED)
(EXISTING SECTION) 26.68.395 Building or building complex identification_
signs in the general commercial district. In addition to the wall sign area
allowed for individual businesses, general commercial district buildings or
building complexes which are designed to contain four or more distinct
tenant spaces, may be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-way,
or public access thoroughfare. Such signs shall not extend beyond the prop-
erty line or into the right-of-way or thoroughfare, and shall be used
solely to identify the building or building complex. Relative to such signs,
the maximum allowable sign area shall be based on the following:
1 . Up to 50 feet of frontage, three (3) square feet of
sign area.
2. Over 50 feet of frontage, up to 75 feet, five (5)
square feet of sign area.
3. Over 75 feet of frontage, up to 100 feet, ten (10)
square feet of sign area.
4. Over 100 feet of frontage, maximum size of 15 square
feet.
These signs, when permitted to be freestanding, shall not exceed eight
(8) feet in height, and shall not be erected without first having proper
approval as provided in this chapter.
CHANGES: Provides a standard of 100 feet of frontage for permitting
freestanding signs.
0. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.480 to read:
SIGN COLORS. The number and type of colors used shall be as approved by
the Design Review Board.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.480 Number of colors allowed. All signs regulated.
by this chapter shall contain no more than four complementary colors. Black
and white shall be considered as colors. (Ord. 129 §4(part) , 1977: Ord.
98 51 (part( , 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-16.06) .
CHANGES: Allows the Design Review Board to approve more than four
colors.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend to the Commission that it adopt Planning Commission
Resolution No.
" A Resolution of the Planning Commission
of the City of Palm Desert, California,
recommending to the City Council that
it approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment
08-81 concerning the regulation of signs.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
i
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 738
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 25.68 OF THE MUNI-
CIPAL CODE CONCERNING THE REGULATION OF
SIGNS, A CLASS 5 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR
PURPOSES
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California,
did on the 19th day of August, 1981 , hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and a
continued Public Hearing on September 1 , 1981 , to consider amendments and additions
to Chapter 25.68 of the Municipal Code initiated by the PALM DESERT PLANNING
COMMISSION concerning the regulation of signs";
WHEREAS, said amendments have complied with the requirements of the
"City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality
Act, Resolution No. 80-89 in that the Director of Environmental Services has
determined the project to be a Class 5 Categorical Exemption; and,
WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering the testi-
mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said
Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their recommendations
as described below:
1 . Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment:
a. That the Zoning Ordinance Amendment is consistent
with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance.
b. That the Zoning Ordinance Amendment is consistent
with the adopted General Plan and effected Specific
Plans.
c. That the Zoning Ordinance Amendment would better r
serve the public health, safety, and general welfare
than the current regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Palm Desert, as follows:
1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and consti-
tute the findings of the Commission in these cases;
2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City
Council approval of a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment as
provided in the attached Exhibit "A" to amend Municipal
Code Chapter 25.68.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert
Planning Commission, held on this 1st day of September, 1981 , by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: Kryder, Richards, Wood and Miller
NOES: None
ABSENT: Berkey
ABSTAIN: None
CHARLES MILLER, Chairman
ATTEST:
RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary
/pa
r
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 738 Page Two
EXHIBIT "A"
25.68.150 - Open House Signs. During the period under which real estate
is offered for sale or lease and while a salesperson is physically present on the
premises, one sign per street frontage not exceeding four feet in height and three
square feet in area shall be permitted.
Two on-site real estate flags per street not to exceed 6 feet in height nor dimensions
of 18" x 30" shall be permitted. (This flag provision shall be reviewed by Planning
Commission 6 months after adoption by City Council and shall report on any problems.
If deemed appropriate, the provision shall be rescinded) .
Off-site directional signs may be permitted for an open house, subject to the
following provisions:
A. Each sign shall not exceed three (3) square feet;
B. No flags or banners shall be used;
C. To be located on private property only, unless prior written
approval for unique circumstances is obtained from the Director
of Environmental Services.
25.68.615 Open Summer Signs. Between June 1st and October 1st, restaurants,
retail and personal service businesses within the commercial zone may display a sign
in addition to a main sign, not to exceed five (5) square feet, indicating if they
will remain open during the summer. The design and location of the sign shall be
compatible with other signs on the building and must be approved by the Department
of Environmental Services.
26.68.335 Restaurant Menu Boards. In addition to those signs permitted by
this title, a restaurant may mount a sign on a wall or window, not to exceed three
(3) square feet displaying the menu and or daily specials. When a restaurant is set
back more than five (5) feet from the public right-of-way or pedestrian walkway, a
freestanding easel may be set up within the setback to display the menu board during
hours when meals are being served. Said sign may not encroach into the public right-
of-way or obstruct pedestrian movement.
25.68.590 Land Subdivision Signs. Signs advertising land subdivisions shall
be limited to:
A. One double faced sign per frontage not to exceed forty (40)
square feet per face or two single faced signs, forty square
feet per face per frontage.
B. Two 15 square foot on-site directional signs per street
frontage shall be permitted. Said signs shall direct
persons to the subdivision entrance.
25.68.270 Sign Area - Commercial and Industrial Uses. Sign design, location
and size shall be as approved by the Design Review Process. Relative thereto, the
following sign areas shall apply:
A. Businesses within one hundred feet of a public right-of-way which
they face, or businesses which front only on a common use parking
area shall be entitled to one square foot of sign per lineal
foot of frontage, unless the Design Review Board determines that
the proposed size of the sign is not in harmony with the design of
the building. Such a sign must be located adjacent to the right-
of-way from which its area is determined.
B. Businesses located greater than 100 feet from a public right-of-way,
which they face, shall be entitled to 1z square foot of sign per
lineal foot of frontage, unless the Design Review Board determines
that the proposed size of the sign is not in harmony with the
design of the building. Such a sign must be located adjacent to
the right-of-way from which its area is determined.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESULUTION NO. 738 Page Three
EXHIBIT "A" (cont. )
C. A single business having lineal frontage on any right-of-way
in excess of fifty feet, shall be entitled in addition to
subsections A or B, an additional one-half square foot of
sign area for each lineal foot of frontage in excess of fifty
feet up to one hundred feet, and an additional one quarter
square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of frontage
in excess of a hundred feet.
25.68.290 Alternative Sign Area Allocation For Small Commercial Complexes.
Owners of multi-tenant buildings or commercial complexes, may divide the total sign
area allocated to the building street frontage (per Section 25.68.270) among the
various tenants to allow tenants not having street frontage to have signage on said
street.
Said signs must meet all other requirements of this chapter.
26.68.390 Signs in District and Regional Shopping Centers and Industrial
Parks. In addition to the wall sign area allowed for individual businesses, shop-
ping centers and industrial parks in excess of three and one-half acres of land
shall be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-way. Such signs shall
not extend beyond the property line or into the right-of-way and shall be used solely
to identify the shopping center, shopping area, or businesses and/or activities con-
ducted therein. Relative to such signs, the allowable sign area shall be based on
ten square feet of sign per acre. These signs shall not exceed one hundred square
feet, shall have a maximum height of twelve feet, and shall not be erected without
first having proper approval as provided in this chapter.
Further, where the unique design of the center allows for adequate integration of
a larger sign, the permitted pedestrian traffic signs as allowed in Section 25.68.330
may be increased to a maximum of six square feet per side.
25.68.400 Sales and Rental Signs.
A. Commercial and industrial properties shall be authorized sale or
rental signs on the following basis:
1. Under 200 feet of frontage on a public road, one sign
per frontage, 3 square feet per sign.
2. Over 200 feet of frontage on a public right of way, one
sign per frontage, twelve square feet in area.
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satisfactory to the
Director of Environmental Services. Such signs shall be removed
upon completion of escrow.
25.68.250 Sales and Rental Signs (Other Residential Zones).
A. Properties in residential zones other than single family shall be author-
ized sale or rental signs on the following basis:
1. Under 200 feet of street frontage, one sign per frontage,
3 square feet per sign.
2. Over 200 feet of street frontage, one sign per frontage,
twelve square feet in area.
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satisfactory to the
Director of Environmental Services. Such signs shall be removed upon
completion of escrow.
25.68.350 Special Event Signs. With the approval of the Director of
Environmental Services, a business may erect one temporary sign, mounted on a wall ,
facia or freestanding, advertising special events, promotions or sales. The
Director may approve up to 30 square feet of sign area depending upon the type of
event, building design and right-of-way frontage for a period not to exceed 30 days
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 738 Page Four
EXHIBIT "A" (cont. )
per year. When improperly used, special event signs constitute a public nuisance
and may be abated.
25.68. 130 Realty Signs. During a period of time when realty is offered
for sale or rent, a sign so indicating, not to exceed 3 square feet and four feet
in height may be located on the property facing each frontage. No real estate
sign shall be located on a roof; project from a building face; or, move in any
manner. Any such sign shall be removed upon rental of the property, or upon close
of escrow. In addition, one rider not to exceed five inches by sixteen inches may
be installed at the bottom of the main sign.
25.68.310 Freestanding Signs. A building or commercial complex within
the General Commercial Zone with individual street frontage of 100 feet or more,
shall be entitled to one single or double faced freestanding sign per frontage,
15 square feet per face for purposes of identification of its tenants.
The total signage, freestanding and wall mounted, on a particular frontage shall not
exceed the maximum allowable area set forth in Section 25.68.270. On a double faced
sign only one face shall be considered. The signs shall not exceed 8 feet in height
or 5 feet in width and shall be located within a landscaped area not less than 25
square feet and shall not encroach into the public right-of-way.
Design and location of the signs shall be approved by the Director of Environmental
Services, Design Review Board or Planning Commission as set forth in Sign Permit
Procedures Section 25.68.030.
25.68.395 Buildin or Buildin Complex Identification Sin In The General
Commercial District. Ina ition to the wall sign area allowed for in ividual
businesses, general commercial district buildings or building complexes which are
designed to contain four or more distinct tenant spaces, may be allowed one identi-
fication sign on each right-of-way, or public access thoroughfare. Such signs shall
not extend beyond the property line or into the right-of-way or thoroughfare, and
shall be used solely to identify the building or building complex. Relative to
such signs, the maximum allowable sign area shall be based on the following:
A. Up to 50 feet of frontage, three (3) square feet of sign area.
B. Over 50 feet of frontage, up to 75 feet, five (5) square feet
of sign area.
C. Over 75 feet of frontage, up to 100 feet, ten (10) square feet
of sign area.
D. Over 100 feet of frontage, maximum size of 15 square feet.
Buildings with frontage of 100 feet or more shall be permitted a freestanding sign,
height not to exceed 8' .
25.68.480 Sign Colors. The number and type of colors used shall be as
approved by the Design Review Board.
25.68.290 Frontage Parking Lots. Delete
CITY OF PALM DESERT
STAFF REPORT
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT ON: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
APPLICANT: CITY OF PALM DESERT
CASE NO: ZOA 08-81
DATE: SEPTEHBER 1 , 1981
I. REQUEST:
Amendment to Municipal Code, Chapter 25.68 concerning regulation of signs.
II. BACKGROUND:
A. CASE INITIATION:
This amendment was initiated by the Planning Commission by minute
motion July 15, 1981 .
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the proposed
amendments are a Class 5, categorical exemption for purposes of CEQA.
III. DISCUSSION:
These proposed sign ordinance amendments were the result of discussions
with individual merchants, the Chamber of Commerce, Board of Realtors, the
Design Review Board and the general public. The changes are designed to
increase sign effectiveness while retaining necessary design controls.
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS:
A. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.150 to read:
OPEN HOUSE SIGNS. During the period under which real estate is offered
for sale or lease and while a sal`esperson' is physically present on the
premises, one sign per street frontage not exceeding four feet in height
and three square feet in area shall be permitted.
Two on-site real estate flags per street not to exceed 6 feet in height
nor dimensions of 18"x30" shall be permitted. (This flag provision shall
be reviewed by Planning Commission 6 months after adoption by City
Council and shall report on any problems. If deemed appropriate, the
provision shall be extended.
Off-site directional signs may be permitted for an open house, subject
to the following provisions:
A. Each sign shall not exceed three (3) square feet;
B. No flags or banners shall be used;
C. To be located on private property only, unless prior written
approval for unique circumstances is obtained from the Director
of Environmental Services.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.150 Open house signs. During the period under
which real estate is offered for sale or lease and while a salesperson
is physically present on the premises, a sign indicating open house shall
be permitted. The sign shall not exceed three square feet in area; and
if located on a pole, no part of the sign or pole shall exceed four feet
above ground level . One off-site directional sign may be permitted for
an open house, subject to the following provisions :
A. It shall not exceed three square feet;
B. No flags or banners shall be used;
C. To be located on private property only;
D. Limited to one sign only. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord.98 51 (part)
1975: Exhibit A 525.38-10.03).
1
STAFF REPORT
CAST NO. ZOA 08-81 PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 1 ; 1981
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: (CONTINUED)
CHANGE: 1 . Allows one sign per street frontage instead of only
one sign.
2. Allows for two flags per street frontage, none
presently allowed.
B. (NEW) 25.68.615 to read:
OPEN SUMMER SIGNS - Between June 1st and October lst, restaurants ,
retail and personal service businesses within the commercial zone
may display a sign in addition to a main sign, not to exceed five
(5) square feet, indicating if they will remain open during the
summer. The design and location of the sign shall be compatible with
other signs on the building and must be approved by the Department
of Environmental Services.
CHANGE: Presently additional signs are prohibited.
C. (NEW) 25.68.335 to read:
RESTAURANT MENU BOARDS - In addition to those signs permitted by
this title, a restaurant may mount a sign on a wall or window, not
to exceed three (3) square feet displaying the menu and or daily
specials. When a restaurant is set back more than five (5) feet from
the public right-of-way or pedestrian walkway, a freestanding easel
may be set up within the setback, to display the menu board during
hours when meals are being served. Said sign may not encroach into
the public right-of-way or obstruct pedestrian movement.
CHANGE: Present ordinance prohibits wall mounted or freestanding
signs for menu display purposes.
i
D. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.590 to read:
LAND SUBDIVISION SIGNS - Signs advertising land subdivisions shall be
limited to:
A. One double faced sign per frontage not to
exceed forty (40) square feet per face or
two single faced signs , forty square feet
per face per frontage.
B. Two 15 square foot on-site directional s.igns
per street frontage shall be permitted. Said
signs shall direct persons to the subdivision
entrance.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.590 Land subdivision signs. Signs advertising
land subdivisions shall be limited to one double-faced sign of thirty-
two square feet per side, placed at a right angle to the street or two
thirty-two-square-foot signs facing the street. Such signs shall be at
least two hundred feet apart and shall be placed upon the subdivision.
Such signs shall be removed at the end of two years or when the sub-
division is sold, whichever occurs first. These signs shall not be
illuminated. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord. 98 §1 (part) , 1975: Exhibit
A §25. 38-17.03) .
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE FOUR
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (CONTINUED)
G. A single business having a lineal frontage or any
right-of-way in excess of fifty feet may be allowed, in addition to sub-
sections A or B, an additional one square foot of sign area for each two
feet of frontage in excess of such fifty feet up to one hundred feet, and
an additional one square foot of sign area for each four feet of frontage
in excess of one hundred feet. (Ord. 129 84 (part) , 1977: Ord. 98 Sl (part) ,
1975: Exhibit A §25.38-12.01 ) .
CHANGES: 1 . Establishes sign area minimums as a matter .of right.
Presently the Design Review Board has unlimited
authority to reduce sign areas below maximum allowable.
2. Deletes requirements that signs be ten feet apart.
3. Allows Design Review Board to approve more than one
main sign.
F. (PROPOSED) Delete 25.68.290 Frontage Parking Lots. (This Section has
been incorporated with 25.68.270.
G. (NEW) 25.68.290 to read:
ALTERNATIVE SIGN AREA ALLOCATION FOR SMALL COMMERCIAL COMPLEXES Owners
of multi-tenant buildings or commercial complexes, may divide the total
sign area allocated to the building street frontage (per section 25.68.270)
among the various tenants to allow tenants not having street frontage to
have signage on said street.
Said signs must meet all other reugirements of this chapter.
CHANGE: Presently only businesses with street frontage are allowed
main signs on the frontage.
H. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.390 to read:
SIGNS IN DISTRICT AND REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS AND INDUSTRIAL PARKS -
In Addition to the wall sign area allowed for individual businesses ,
shopping centers and industrial parks in excess of three and one-half
acres of land shall be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-
way. Such signs shall not extend beyond the property line or into the
right-of-way and shall be used solely to identify the shopping center,
shopping area, or. businesses and/or activities conducted therein. Relative
to such signs, the allowable sign area shall be based on ten square feet
of sign per acre. These signs shall not exceed one hundred square feet,
shall have a maximum height of twelve feet, and shall not be erected with-
out first having proper approval as provided in this chapter.
Further, where the unique design of the center allows for adequate
integration of a larger sign, the permitted pedestrian traffic signs
as allowed in Section 25.68. 330 may be increased to a maximum of six
square feet per side.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.390 Signs in district and regional shopping
centers. In addition to the wall sign area allowed for individual
businesses, shopping centers in excess of three and one-half acres of
land shall be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-way.
Such signs shall not extend beyond the property line or into the right-
of-way and shall be used solely to identify the shopping center, shopping
area, or businesses and/or activities conducted therein. Relative to
such signs, the allowable sign area shall be based on five square feet
of sign per acre. These signs shall not exceed twenty-five square feet,
shall have a maximum height of eight feet, and shall not be erected
without first having proper approval as provided in this chapter.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE FIVE
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (•CONTINUED)
Further, where the unique design of the center allows
for adequate integration of a larger sign, the permitted pedestrian
traffic signs as allowed in Section 25.68.330 may be increased to a
maximum of six square feet per side. (Ord. 129 §4(part) , 1977: Ord. 98
§l (part, 1975: Exhibit A §25.38-12.12) .
CHANGES: A. Increases size from 5 square feet to 10 square feet
per acre and the maximum from 25 square feet to one
hundred square feet.
B. Increases maximum height from 8 feet to 12 feet.
I. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.400 to read:
SALE AND RENTAL SIGNS
A. Commercial and industrial properties shall be authorized
sale or rental signs on the following basis:
1 . Under 200 feet of frontage on a public road, one sign
per frontage, 3 square feet per sign.
2. Over 200 feet of frontage on a public right of way,
one sign per frontage, twelve square feet in area.
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satis-
factory to the director of envirnomental services.
Such signs shall be removed upon completion of escrow.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.400 Sale and rental signs.
A. Commercial and industrial properties shall be authorized
sale or rental signs on the following basis:
1 . Under two and one-half acres, one sign;
2. Over two and one-half acres, but less than five
acres, two signs ;
3. Over five acres, one sign per street frontage.
B. These signs shall not exceed three square feet in area
or four feet in height and shall be designed and located in a manner
satisfactory to the director of environmental services. Such signs shall
be removed upon completion of excrow. (Ord. 129 S4(part) , 1977: Ord. 98
S1 (part) , 1975: Exhibit A S25.38-12.13) .
CHANGES: Allows all properties one sign per frontage and increases
the sign area for larger parcels from 3 square feet to 12
square feet.
J. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.250 to read:
SALE AND RENTAL SIGNS (OTHER RESIDENTIAL ZONES)
A. Properties in residential zones other than single
family shall be authorized sale or rental signs on the following basis:
1 . Under 200 feet of street frontage, one sign per
frontage, 3 square feet per sign.
2. Over 200 feet of street frontage, one sign per
frontage, twelve square feet in area.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
SEPTEMBER 1 , 9981 PAGE SIX
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: (CONTINUED)
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satis-
factory to the director of environmental services. Such signs shall be
removed upon completion of escrow.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.250 Sale and rental signs. Uses in residential
zones other than single-family zones shall be authorized one for-sale
or rent sign while the property is actually for sale or rent. Those
signs shall not exceed three square feet in area or four feet in height
and shall be designed and located in a manner satisfactory to the director
of environmental services. All such signs shall be removed upon the rental
of the property or upon the completion of escrow. In addition, one rider
not to exceed five inches by sixteen inches may be installed at the
bottom of any approved real estate sign. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord.
98 51 (part) , 1975: Exhibit A 525. 38-11 .07).
CHANGES: Allows all properties one sign per frontage and increases the
sign area for larger parcels from 3 square feet to 12 square
feet.
K. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.350 to read:
SPECIAL EVENT SIGNS - With the approval of the Director of Environmental
Services, a business may erect one temporary sign, mounted on a wall,
facia or freestanding, advertizing special events, promotions or sales.
The Director may approve up to 30 square feet of sign area depending
upon the type of event, building design and right-of-way frontage for
a period not to exceed 30 days per year. When improperly used, special
event signs constitute a public nuisance and may be abated.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.350 Sale signs. While a sale of goods or ser-
vices is being conducted, one sale sign shall be allowed, located on
the inside of the window. Such a sign shall be in addition to the total
authorized sign area but shall not exceed ten square feet. When improperly
used, sale signs constitute a public nuisance and may be abated as such.
(Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord 98 51 (part) , 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-12.08) .
CHANGE: Presently temporary signs other than grand opening signs
are limited to 10 square feet within window areas.
L. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.130 to read:
REALTY SIGNS - During a period of time when realty is offered for sale
or rent, a sign so indicating, not to exceed 3 square feet and four feet
in height may be located on the property facing each frontage. No real
estate sign shall be located on a roof, project from a building face or
move in any manner. Any such signs shall be removed upon rental of the
property, or upon close of escrow. In addition, one rider not to exceed
five inches by sixteen inches may be installed at the bottom of the main
sign.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.130 Realty Signs. During a period of time
when realty is offered for sale or rent, a sign so indicating, but
not exceeding three square feet in area or four feet in height, may
be located on the property. No real estate signs shall be located on
a roof, project from a building face, or move in any manner. Any such
signs shall be removed upon the rental of the property, or upon the
completion of excrow. After February 24, 1977, no person engaged in
the real estate business as a broker, salesman, or otherwise, shall
use or place signs on property being offered for sale or lease unless
the sign program has first received approval from the director of
environmental services. Prior to requesting approval of any real
estate signs, evidence of a valid city business license shall be
provided. In addition, one rider, not to exceed five inches by six-
teen inches, may be installed at the bottom of any approved real
estate sign. (Ord. 129 §4(part) , 1977: Ord. 98 S1 (part) , 1975: Exhibit
A 525.38-10.01 ) .
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE SEVEN
CHANGE: 1 . Allows a sign on each frontage.
2. Requirement for each sign to have department of
Environmental .Services -approval and its own
sticker has been deleted.
M. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.310 to read:
FREESTANDING SIGNS. A building or commercial complex within the General
Commercial zone with individual street frontage of 100 feet or more, shall
be entitled to one single or double faced freestanding sign per frontage,
15 square feet per face for purposes of identification of its tenants.
The total signage, freestanding and wall mounted, on a particular frontage
shall not exceed the maximum allowable area set forth in Section 25.68.270.
On a double faced sign only one face shall be considered. The signs shall
not exceed 8 feet in height or 5 feet in width and shall be located within
a landscaped area not less than 25 square feet and shall not encroach into
the public right-of-way.
Design and location of the signs shall be approved by the Director of
Environmental Services, Design Review Board or Planning Commission as set
forth in Sign Permit Procedures Section 25.68.030.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.310 Freestanding signs. Except as otherwise provided
in this chapter, freestanding signs shall be prohibited on a single parcel
of property where ther is more than one business.
Where authorized for a signle business, a freestanding sign shall not be
located on the public right-of-way and shall not exceed twelve feet in
height. The size of the freestanding sign shall not exceed the limitations
of Section 25.68.270 and shall be in lieu of any wall signs. (Ord. 129 54
(part) , 1977: Ord. 98 Sl (part) , 1975: Exhibit A §25.38-12.03 (B) .
N. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.395 to read:
BUILDING OR BUILDING COMPLEX IDENTIFICATION SIGNS IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT. In addition to the wall sign area allowed for individual businesses,
general commercial district buildings or building complexes which are designed
to contain four or more distinct tenant spaces, may be allowed one identi-
fication sign on each right-of-way, or public access thoroughfare. Such
signs shall not extend beyond the property line or into the right-of-way or
thoroughfare, and shall be used solely to identify the building or building
complex. Relative to such signs, the maximum allowable sign area shall be
based on the following:
1 . Up to 50 feet of frontage, three (3) square
feet of sign area.
2. Over 50 feet of frontage, up to 75 feet, five (5)
square feet of sign area.
3. Over 75 feet of frontage, up to 100 feet, ten (10)
square feet of sign area.
4. Over 100 feet of frontage, maximum size of 15 square
feet.
Buildings with frontage of 100 feet or more shall be permitted a freestanding
sign, height not to exceed 8' .
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
SEPTEMBER 1 , 1981 PAGE EIGHT
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (CONTINUED)
(EXISTING SECTION) 26.68.395 Building or building complex identification
signs in the general commercial district. In addition to the wall sign area
allowed for individual businesses, general commercial district buildings or
building complexes which are designed to contain four or more distinct
tenant spaces, may be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-way,
or public access thoroughfare. Such signs shall not extend beyond the prop-
erty line or into the right-of-way or thoroughfare, and shall be used
solely to identify the building or building complex. Relative to such signs,
the maximum allowable sign area shall be based on the following:
1 . Up to 50 feet of frontage, three (3) square feet of
sign area.
2. Over 50 feet of frontage, up to 75 feet, five (5)
square feet of sign area.
3. Over 75 feet of frontage, up to 100 feet, ten (10)
square feet of sign area.
4. Over 100 feet of frontage, maximum size of 15 square
feet.
These signs, when permitted to be freestanding, shall not exceed eight
(8) feet in height, and shall not be erected without first having proper
approval as provided in this chapter.
CHANGES: Provides a standard of 100 feet of frontage for permitting
freestanding signs.
0. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.480 to read:
SIGN COLORS. The number and type of colors used shall be as approved by
the Design Review Board.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.480 Number of colors allowed. All signs regulated
by this chapter shall contain no more than four complementary colors. Black
and white shall be considered as colors. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord.
98 51 (part( , 1975: Exhibit A §25.38-16.06) .
CHANGES: Allows the Design Review Board to approve more than four
colors.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend to the Commission that it adopt Planning Commission
Resolution No.
" A Resolution of the Planning Commission
of the City of Palm Desert, California,
recommending to the City Council that
it approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment
08-81 concerning the regulation of signs.
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
ILI (c:al
(,b DeD.
�1lb`✓la►Jg
l . T 61 o C¢. Gom aea,
-�jCoYv�. oppno5t6 43iJ6 :a 5k aULr-> Poe.
irkIL
X o '
•� . 2�v i..�� ►� �✓�-..�Y�S -� a���, Vag
to
La�o� fi'r�►,s- oN 6-br�.�� L t � .
J _
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
CITY OF PALM DESERT
LEGAL NOTICE
AN AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER•.--
25.68 CONCERNING THE REGULATION OF
SIGNS. A CLASS 5 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
FOR PURPOSES OF CEQA.
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the
Palm Desert City Council to consider an amendment to Chapter 25.68 of
the Municipal Code concerning the regulation of signs by the Palm
Desert Planning Commission.
SAID Public Hearing will be held on September 24, 1981 at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear
Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested
persons are invited to attend and be heard.
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk
City of Palm Desert, California
PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post
September 10, 1981
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AUGUST 19, 1981 Page Two
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont. )
Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of the applicant sharing the
accesses with the shopping center. Mr. Diaz advised Commission that permission
would be needed by the City of Indian Wells.
Commissioner Richards felt that this matter was a major problem and there
were several alternatives the applicant could consider. He felt that the applicant
should research the matter before any decisions are made. Commissioner Wood agreed.
Commissioner Berkey believed that the solution would be to install traffic
signals.
Commissioner Richards did not approve of the entry way as designed and was
concerned if the operation of this project would be as a "hotel ".
Discussion on how a Condotel is operated and used proceeded.
MR. DENNIS FREEMAN, 68-713 Perez Road, Representative, explained how each
unit is owned and used, stressing that it will operate as a hotel .
Commissioner Berkey suggested that condition no. 21 be revised to say:
"Agreements concerning the ownership and operation shall be subject to the City
Attorney approval ."
Mr. McClellan, Public Works Director, agreed that the only solution to the
access problem would be signalization, if access to the east of the project cannot
be acquired.
Commissioner Berkey stated that since Mr. McClellan agreed that traffic signals
would be the solution to the access problem he suggested that this matter be taken to
a higher district of Cal Trans.
Mr. McClellan assured Commission that he would follow-up with a letter to the
District Engineer of Cal Trans.
Because of concerns expressed by Commission regarding access, Mr. Diaz suggested
an additional condition be added to read: "Signalized entry to the facility shall
. be developed from Highway 111 and aligned with the entry of the proposed hotel
development on the north side of Highway 111. The plans reflecting said access shall
be submitted to Planning Commission for approval . "
Commission felt there were too many major problems unresolved, therefore,
agreed to continue this case.
Commissioner Richards also requested that the applicant give input regarding
the next door development, at the next public hearing for this case.
Motion was made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Berkey,
to continue this case to October 14, 1981. Carried (4-0).
B. Case No. ZOA 08-81 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicants
Consideration of an amendment to Municipal Code, Chapter
25.68, concerning regulation of signs.
Mr. Drell reviewed the proposed modifications to the sign ordinance and
recommended a continuance for consideration of Commission and public comments.
Vice Chairman Kryder opened the public hearing and asked for public testimony.
GnibTr off SeILr 1���Css�4o
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEFr10NE (714) 346-0611
CITY OF PALM DESERT
LEGAL NOTICE
AN AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE
CHAPTER 25.28 CONCERNING SEATING
PROVISIONS FOR RESTAURANTS AND
RETAIL FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS, A
CLASS 5 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS
FOR PURPOSES OF CEQA
CASE NO. ZOA 09-81
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert
Planning Commission to consider an amendment to Chapter 25.28 of the Municipal
Code concerning seating provisions for restaurants and retail food . Stores
initiated by the Palm Desert Planning Commission.
SAID Public Hearing will be held on August 19, 1981 at 1 :00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert,
California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend
and be heard.
RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary
Palm Desert Planning Commission
PUBLISH:
U Palm Desert Post
August 6, 1981
i
} - V1
� U
CITY OF PALM DESERT
STAFF REPORT /
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT ON: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
APPLICANT: CITY OF PAL14 DESERT
CASE NO: ZOA 08-81
DATE: AUGUST 19, 1981
I. REQUEST:
Amendment to Municipal Code, Chapter 25.68 concerning regulation of signs.
II. BACKGROUND:
A. CASE INITIATION:
This amendment was initiated by the Planning Commission by minute
motion July 15, 1981 .
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:
The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the proposed
amendments are a Class 5, categorical exemption for purposes of CEQA.
III. DISCUSSION:
These proposed sign ordinance amendments were the result of discussions
with individual merchants, the Chamber of Commerce, Board of Realtors, the
Design Review Board and the general public. The changes are designed to
increase sign effectiveness while retaining necessary design controls.
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS:
A. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68. 150 to read:
OPEN HOUSE SIGNS. During the period under which real estate is offered
for sale or lease and while a salesperson is physically present on the
premises, one sign per street frontage not exceeding four feet in height
and three square feet in area shall be permitted. In addition, two real
estate flags per street not to exceed six feet in height nor a dimension
of 18"x3O" shall be permitted on site.
Off-site directional signs may be permitted for an open house, subject
to the following provisions:
A. Each sign shall not exceed three (3) square feet;
B. No flags or banners shall be used;
C. To be located on private property only, unless prior written
approval for unique circumstances is obtained from the Director
of Environmental Services.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.150 Open house signs. During the period under
which real estate is offered for sale or lease and while a salesperson
is physically present on the premises, a sign indicating open house shall
be permitted. The sign shall not exceed three square feet in area; and
if located on a pole, no part of the sign or pole shall exceed four feet
above ground level . One off-site directional sign may be permitted for
an open house, subject to the following provisions:
A. It shall not exceed three square feet;
B. No flags or banners shall be used;
C. To be located on private property only;
D. Limited to one sign only. (Ord. 129 84(part) , 1977: Ord.98 51 (part)
1975: Exhibit A 125. 38-10.03) .
f
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81 PAGE TWO
AUGUST 19, 1981
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: (CONTINUED)
CHANGE: 1 . Allows one sign per street frontage instead of only
one sign.
2. Allows for two flags per street frontage, none
presently allowed.
B. (NEW) 25.68.615 to read:
OPEN SUMMER SIGNS - Between June 1st and October 1st, restaurants ,
retail and personal service businesses within the commercial zone
may display a sign in addition to a main sign, not to exceed five
(5) square feet, indicating if they will remain open during the
summer. The design and location of the sign shall be compatible with
other signs on the building and must be approved by the Department
of Environmental Services.
CHANGE: Presently additional signs are prohibited.
C. (NEW) 25.68. 335 to read:
RESTAURANT MENU BOARDS - In addition to those .signs permitted by
this title, a restaurant may mount a sign on a wall or window, not
to exceed three (3) square feet displaying the menu and or daily
specials. When a restaurant is set back more than five (5) feet from
the public right-of-way or pedestrian walkway, a freestanding easel
may be set up within the setback, to display the menu board during
hours when meals are being served. Said sign may not encroach into
the public right-of-way or obstruct pedestrian movement.
CHANGE: Present ordinance prohibits wall mounted or freestanding
signs for menu display purposes.
D. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.590 to read:
LAND SUBDIVISION SIGNS - Signs advertising land subdivisions shall be
limited to:
A. One double faced sign per frontage not to
exceed forty (40) square feet per face or
two single faced signs, forty square feet
per face per frontage.
B. Two 15 square foot on-site directional signs
per street frontage shall be permitted. Said
signs shall direct persons to the subdivision
entrance.
C. Pennants (flagpole type only) with name of
developer, development or solid color no
larger than three feet by four feet, fifty
feet apart shall be permitted.
E. (EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.590 Land subdivision signs. Signs advertising
land subdivisions shall be limited to one double-faced sign of thirty-
two square feet per side, placed at a right angle to the street or two
thirty-two-square-foot signs facing the street. Such signs shall be at
least two hundred feet apart and shall be placed upon the subdivision.
Such signs shall be removed at the end of two years or when the sub-
division is sold, whichever occurs first. These signs shall not be
illuminated. (Ord. 129 S4(part) , 1977: Ord. 98 §1 (part) , 1975: Exhibit
A 525.38-17.03).
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
AUGUST 19, 1981 PAGE THREE
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (CONTINUED)
CHANGES: 1 . Increases present allowable size by 8 square feet.
2. Allows one sign per street abutting subdivision
instead of one per developer.
3. Allows additional on site directional signs of
15 square feet in size.
4. Permits Pennants which were previously prohibited.
E. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.270 to read:
SIGN AREA - COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES - Sign design, location
and size shall be as approved by the Design Review process. Relative
thereto, the following maximum sign areas shall apply:
A. The total or aggregatearea for a main sign for
businesses within one hundered feet of a public
right-of-way which they face, or businesses which .
front only on a common use parking area, shall not
exceed one square foot of sign per lineal foot of
frontage on that right-of-way or parking lot up to
fifty lineal feet. Such signs must be located
adjacent to the right-of-way or parking lot from
which its allowable size is determined.
B. The total or aggregatearea for a main sign for
businesses located greater than 100 feet from a
public right-of-way which they face shall not
exceed one and one-half square feet of_ sign area
per linear foot of frontage up to fifty lineal
square feet. Such a sign must be located adjacent
to the right-of-way from which its area is deter-
mined.
C. A single business having lineal frontage on any
right-of-way in excess of fifty feet, may be
approved in addition to subsections A or B, an
additional one-half square foot of sign area for
each lineal foot of frontage in excess of fifty feet
up to one hundred feet, and an additional one
quarter square foot of sign area for each lineal
foot of frontage in excess of a hundred feet.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.270 Sign Area-Commercial and industrial uses.
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each separate business
shall be limited to one main sign integrated into the design of the
building. Relative thereto, the following sign areas shall apply:
A. The total or aggregatearea of a main sign for any
business in a building located within one hundred feet of the right-of-
way upon which it faces shall not exceed the equivalent of one square
foot of sign area per lineal foot of frontage which the building has
facing on a right-of-way or parking lot. Except as otherwise provided
in this chapter, such sign shall have a surface area no greater than
fifty square feet. No such signs shall be closer than ten feet from
any other sign permitted under this chapter. Such a sign must be
located adjacent to the right-of-way or parking lot from which its
maximum allowable size is determined.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
AUGUST 19, 1981 PAGE FOUR
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (CONTINUED)
B. The total aggregate area for a main sign for any
business in a building located one hundred feet or more from any right-of-
way upon which it faces shall not exceed the equivalent.of one and one-
half square feet of sign area per lineal foot of frontage which the build-
ing has facing on a public right-of-way or parking lot. Except as provided
in this chapter, such signs shall have a surface area no greater than
seventy-five square feet. No such sign shall be closer than ten feet to
any other sign permitted under this chapter. Such a sign must be located
adjacent to the right-of-way or parking lot from which its maximum allowable
size is determined.
C. A single business having a lineal frontage or any
right-of-way in excess of fifty feet may be allowed, in addition to sub-
sections A or B, an additional one square foot of sign area for each two
feet of frontage in excess of such fifty feet up to one hundred feet, and
an additional one square foot of sign area for each four feet of frontage
in excess of one hundred feet. (Ord. 129 §4 (part) , 1977: Ord. 98 S1 (part) ,
1975: Exhibit A 525.38-12.01 ).
CHANGES: 1 . Deletes requirements that signs be ten feet apart.
2. Allows Design Review Board to approve more than one
main sign.
F. (PROPOSED) Delete 25.68.290 Frontage Parking Lots. (This Section has
been incorporated with 25.68.270.
G. (NEW) 25.68.290 to read:
ALTERNATIVE SIGN AREA ALLOCATION FOR SMALL COMMERCIAL COMPLEXES - Owners
of commercial complexes with six tenants or less, may divide the total
sign area allocated to the building street frontage (per section
25.68.270) among the various tenants to allow tenants not having street
frontage to have signage on said street.
Said signs must meet all other requirements of this chapter.
CHANGE: Presently only businesses with street frontage are allowed
main signs on the frontage.
H. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.390 to read:
SIGNS IN DISTRICT AND REGIONAL .SHOPPING CENTERS AND INDUSTRIAL PARKS -
In addition to the wall sign area allowed for individual businesses,
shopping centers and industrial parks in excess of three and one-half
acres of land shall be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-
way. Such signs shall not extend beyond the property line or into the
right-of-way and shall be used solely to identify the shopping center,
shopping area, or businesses and/or activities conducted therein. Relative
to such signs, the allowable sign area shall be based on ten square feet
of sign per acre. These signs shall not exceed one hundred square feet,
shall have a maximum height of twelve feet, and shall not be erected with-
out first having proper approval as provided in this chapter.
Further, where the unique design of the center allows for adequate
integration of a larger sign, the permitted pedestrian traffic signs
as allowed in Section 25.68.330 may be increased to a maximum of six
square feet per side.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ZOA 08-81
AUGUST 19, 1981 PAGE FIVE
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: (CONTINUED)
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68. 390 Signs in district and regional shopping
centers. In addition to the wall sign area allowed for individual
businesses, shopping centers in excess of three and one-half acres of
land shall be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-way.
Such signs shall not extend beyond the property line or into the right-
of-way and shall be used solely to identify the shopping center, shopping
area, or businesses and/or activities conducted therein. Relative to
such signs, the allowable sign area shall be based on five square feet
of sign per acre. These signs shall not exceed twenty-five square feet,
shall have a maximum height of eight feet, and shall not be erected
without first having proper approval as provided in this chapter.
Further, where the unique design of the center allows
for adequate integration of a larger sign, the permitted pedestrian
traffic signs as allowed in Section 25.68.330 may be increased to a
maximum of six square feet per side. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord. 98
§l (part, 1975: Exhibit A §25.38-12.12) .
CHANGES: A. Increases size from 5 square feet to 10 square feet
per acre and the maximum from 25 square feet to one
hundred square feet.
B. Increases maximum height from 8 feet to 12 feet.
I . (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.400 to read:
SALE AND RENTAL SIGNS
A. Commercial and industrial properties shall be authorized
sale or rental signs on the following basis:
1 . Under two acres, one sign per frontage, 3 square
feet per sign.
2. Over two acres, one sign per frontage, twelve
square feet in area.
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satis-
factory to the director of environmental services.
Such signs shall be removed upon completion of escrow.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.400 Sale and rental _si ns.
A. Commercial and industrial properties shall be authorized
sale or rental signs on the following basis:
1 . Under two and one-half acres, one sign;
2. Over two and one-half acres, but less than five
acres, two signs;
3. Over five acres, one sign per street frontage.
B. These signs shall not exceed three square feet in area
or four feet in height and shall be designed and located in a manner
satisfactory to the director of environmental services. Such signs shall
be removed upon completion of escrow. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord. 98
51 (part) , 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-12.13).
CHANGES: Allows all properties one sign per frontage and increases
the sign area for parcels larger than two acres from 3
square feet to 12 square feet.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO ZOA 08-81
AUGUST 19, 1981 PAGE SIX
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: (CONTINUED)
J. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.250 to read:
SALE AND RENTAL SIGNS (OTHER RESIDENTIAL ZONES)
A. Properties in residential zones other than single family shall
be authorized sale or rental signs on the following basis:
1 . Under two acres, one sign per frontage, 3 square
feet per sign.
2. Over two acres, one sign per frontage, twelve
square feet in area.
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satisfactory to
the director of environmental services. Such signs shall be
removed upon completion of escrow.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.250 Sale and rental signs. Uses in residential
zones other than single-family zones shall be authorized one for-sale
or rent sign while the property is actually for sale or rent. Those
signs shall not exceed three square feet in area or four feet in height
and shall be designed and located in a manner satisfactory to the director
of environmental services. All such signs shall be removed upon the rental
of the property or upon the completion of escrow. In addition, one rider
not to exceed five inches by sixteen inches may be installed at the
bottom of any approved real estate sign. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord.
98 Sl (part) , 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-11 .07).
CHANGES: Allows all properties one sign per frontage and increases
the sign area for parcels larger than two acres from 3
square feet to 12 square feet.
K. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.350 to read:
SPECIAL EVENT SIGNS - With the approval of the Director of Environmental
Services, a business may erect one temporary sign, mounted on a wall
facia or freestanding, advertizing special events, promotions or sales.
The Director may approve up to 30 square feet of sign area depending
upon the type of event, building design and. right-of-way frontage for
a period not to exceed 30 days per year. When improperly used, special
event signs constitute a public nuisance and may be abated.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.350 Sale signs. While a sale of goods or ser-
vices is being conducted, one sale sign shall be allowed, located on
the inside of the window. Such a sign shall be in addition to the total
authorized sign area but shall not exceed ten square feet. When improperly
used, sale signs constitute a public nuisance and may be abated as such.
(Ord. 129 84(part) , 1977: Ord 98 81 (part) , 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-12.08) .
CHANGE: Presently temporary signs other than grand opening signs
are limited to 10 square feet within window areas.
L. (PROPOSED) Amend Section 25.68.130 to read:
REALTY SIGNS - During a period of time when realty is offered for sale
or rent, a sign so indicating, not to exceed 3 square feet and four feet
in height may be located on the property facing each frontage. No real
estate sign shall be located on a roof, project from a building face or
move in any manner. Any such signs shall be removed upon rental of the
property, or upon close of escrow. In addition, one rider not to exceed
five inches by sixteen inches may be installed at the bottom of the main
sign.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO ZOA 08-81
AUGUST 19, 1981 PAGE SEVEN
IV. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS (CONTINUED)
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.130 Realty Signs. During a period of time
when realty is offered for sale or rent, a sign so indicating, but
not exceeding three square feet in area or four feet in height, may
be located on the property. No real estate signs shall be located on
a roof, project from a building face, or move in any manner. Any such
signs shall be removed upon the rental of the property, or upon the
completion of excrow. After February 24, 1977, no person engaged in
the real estate business as a broker, salesman, or otherwise, shall
use or place signs on property being offered for sale or lease unless
the sign program has first received approval from the director of
environmental services. Prior to requesting approval of any real
estate signs, evidence of a valid city business license shall be
provided. In addition, one rider, not to exceed five inches by six-
teen inches, may be installed at the bottom of any approved real
estate sign. (Ord. 129 54(part) , .1977: Ord. 98 51 (part) , 1975: Exhibit
A 525.38-10.01 ) .
CHANGE: 1 . Allows a sign on each frontage.
2. Requirement for each sign to have Department of
Environmental Services approval and its own sticker
_ has been deleted.
M. (PROPOSED) Amend 25.68.310 to read:
FREE STANDING SIGNS - A tenant occupying 51% or more of a building
on a single parcel shall be permitted a freestanding identification
sign for his business only in lieu of a wall sign. The size of the
sign shall comply with Section 25.68.270. The height shall not exceed
12 feet and shall not be located in the public right-of-way.
(EXISTING SECTION) 25.68.310 Freestanding signs. Except as otherwise
provided in this chapter, freestanding signs shall be prohibited on
a single parcel of property where there is more than one business.
Where authorized for a single business, a freestanding sign shall not
be located on the public right-of-way and shall not exceed twelve feet
in height. The size of the freestanding sign shall not exceed the
limitations of Section 25.68.270 and shall be in lieu of any wall signs.
(Ord. 129 J4(part) , 1977: Ord. 98 S1 (part) , 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-12.03
(B)) •
CHANGE: Presently freestanding signs are prohibited on a single
parcel of property where there is more than one tenant.
V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend to the Commission that it adopt Planning Commission
Resolution No.
" A Resolution of the Planning Commission
of the City of Palm Desert, California,
recommending to the City Council that
it approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment
08-81 concerning the regulation of signs.
PREPARED BY: ,
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
City of Palm Desert
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Director of Environmental Services
SUBJECT: Proposed Revisions to the City Sign Regulations DATE: June 30, 1981
Some time ago staff was instructed to examine the present Sign Ordinance and
determine what revisions should be made.
Based on concerns raised by the Design Review Board, members of the Palm Desert
Board of Realtors, residential developers and some members of the business
community, the following revisions are recommended:
Amend Section 25.68.150 to read:
OPEI'd HOUSE SIGNS: During the period under which real estate is offered for sale
or lease and while a salesperson is physically present on the premises, one sign
per street frontage not exceeding four feet in height and three square feet in
area shall be permitted. In addition, two real estate flags per street not to
exceed six feet in height nor a dimension of 18"00" shall be permitted on site.
Off-site directional signs may be permitted for an open house, subject to the
following provisions:
A. Each sign shall not exceed three (3) square feet;
B. No flags or banners shall be used;
C. To be located on private property only, unless prior written
approval for unique circumstances is obtained from the Director
of Environmental Services.
CHANGE: 1 . Allows one sign per street frontage instead of only one sign
2. Allows for two flags per street frontage, none presently allowed.
(NEW) 25.68.615 to read:
OPEN SUMMER SIGNS - Between June 1st and October 1st, restaurants, retail and
personal service businesses within the commercial zone may display a sign in
addition to a main sign, not to exceed five (5) square feet, indicating if they
will remain open during the summer. The design and location of the sign shall be
compatible with other signs on the building and must be approved by the Depart-
ment of Environmental Services.
l
PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE CITY SIGN REGULATIONS PAGE TWO
(NEW) 25.68.335 to read:
RESTAURANT MENU BOARDS - In addition to those signs permitted by this title,
a restaurant may mount a .sign on a wall or window, not to exceed three (3) square
feet displaying the meny and or daily specials. When a restaurant is set back more
than five (5) feet from the public right-of-way or pedestrian walkway, a free-
standing easel may be set up within the setback, to display the menu board during
hours when meals are being served. Said sign may not encroach into the public
right-of-way or obstruct pedestrian movement.
CHANGE: Present ordinance prohibits wall mounted or freestanding signs for menu
display purposes.
AMEND: 25.68.590 to read:
Signs advertising land subdivision shall be limited to:
A. One double faced sign per frontage not to exceed forty (40)
square feet per face or two single faced signs, forty
square feet per face per frontage.
B. Two 15 square foot on-site directional signs per street
frontage shall be permitted. Said signs shall direct persons
to the subdivision entrance.
C. Pennants (flagpole type only) with name of developer, develop-
ment or solid color no larger than three feet by four feet,
fifty feet apart shall be permitted.
CHANGES: 1 . Increases present allowable size by 8 square feet.
2. Allows one sign per street abutting subdivision instead
of one per developer.
3. Allows additional on site directional signs of 15 square
feet in size.
4. Permits Pennants which were previously prohibited.
Amend Section 25.68.270 to read:
SIGN AREA - COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES - Except as otherwise provided in this
chapter, each separate business shall be limited to one main sign integrated into
the design of the building. Relative thereto, the following sign areas shall apply:
A. Businesses within one hundred feet of a public right-of-way which
they face, or businesses which front only on a common use parking
area, shall be entitled to one square foot of sign per lineal foot
of frontage on that right-of-way or parking lot up to fifty lineal
feet. Such signs must be located adjacent to the right-of-way or
parking lot from which its allowable size is determined.
PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE CITY SIGN REGULATIONS PAGE THREE
B. Businesses located greater than 100 feet from a public
right-of-way which they face, shall be entitled to one
and one-half square feet of sign area per lineal foot
of frontage up to fifty lineal square feet. Such a sign
must be located adjacent to the right-of-way from which
its area is determined.
C. A single business having lineal frontage on any right-
of-way in excess of fifty feet, shall be entitled in
addition to subsections A or B, an additional one-half
square foot of sign are for each lineal foot, Frontage
in excess of fifty feet up to one hundred feet, and an
additional one quarter square foot of sign area for each
lineal foot of frontage in excess of a hundred feet.
CHANGES: 1 . Establishes sign area maximums as a matter of right.
Presently the Design Review Board can reduce sign areas
below maximum allowable.
2. Deletes requirements that signs be ten feet apart.
Delete 25.68.290
FRONTAGE PARKING LOTS (This Section has been incorporated with 25.68.270.
(NEW) 25.68.290 to read: -
ALTERNATIVE SIGN AREA ALLOCATION FOR SMALL COMMERCIAL COMPLEXES.
Owners of commercial complexes with six tenants or less, may divide the total sign
area allocated to the building street frontage (per section 25.68.270) among the
various tenants to allow tenants not having street frontage to have signage on
said street.
Said signs must meet all other requirements of this chapter.
CHANGE: Presently only businesses with street frontage are allowed main signs on
the frontage.
(AMEND) 25.68.390 to read:
SIGNS IN DISTRICT AND REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS
In addition to the wall sign area allowed for individual businesses, shopping centers
in excess of three and one-half acres of land shall be allowed one indentification
sign on each right-of-way. Such signs shall not extend beyond the property line or
into the right-of-way and shall be used solely to identify the shopping center,
shopping area, or businesses and/or activities conducted therein. Relative to such
signs, the allowable sign area shall be based on ten square feet of sign per acre.
These signs shall not exceed one hundred square feet, shall have a maximum height
of twelve feet, and shall not be erected without first having proper approval as
provided in this chapter.
PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE CITY SIGN REGULATIONS PAGE FOUR
25.68.390 (Continued)
Further, where the unique design of the center allows for adequate integration of a
larger sign, the permitted pedestrian traffic signs as allowed in Section 25.68.330
may be increased to a maximum of six square feet per side. (Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977:
Ord. 98 51 (part) , 1975: Exhibit A S25.38-12) .
CHANGES: A. Increases size from 5 square feet to 10 square feet per
acre and the maximum from 25 square feet to one hundred
square feet.
B. Increases maximum height from 8 feet to 12 feet.
(AMEND) 25.68.400
SALE AND RENTAL SIGNS
A. Commercial and industrial properties shall be authorized sale or rental signs
on the following basis:
1 . Under two acres, one sign per frontage, 3 square feet
per sign.
2. Over two acres, one sign per frontage, twelve square
feet in area.
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satisfactory to the director of
environmental services. Such signs shall be removed upon completion of escrow.
(Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord. 98 51 (part) , 1975:
Exhibit A 525.38-12.13).
CHANGES: Allows all properties one sign per frontage and increases the sign area
for parcels larger than two acres from 3 square feet to 12 square feet.
(AMEND) 25.68.350 to read:
SALE AND RENTAL SIGNS (OTHER RESIDENTIAL ZONES)
Properties in residential zones other than single family shall be authorized sale
or rental signs on the following basis:
1 . Under two acres, one sign per frontage, 3 square feet
per sign.
2. Over two acres, one sign per frontage, twelve square
feet in area.
B. Signs shall be designed and located in a manner satisfactory to the director of
environmental services. Such signs shall be removed upon completion of escrow.
(Ord. 129 54(part) , 1977: Ord. 98 51 (part) , 1975:
Exhibit A 525.38-12.13).
I
1
•PROPOSED REVISIONS TO TI ;ITY SIGN REGULATIONS PAGE FIVE
s
(AMEND) 25.68.350 to read:
SPECIAL EVENT SIGNS - With the approval of the Director of Environmental Services,
a business may erect one temporary sign, mounted on a wall facia or freestanding,
advertizing special events or promotions. The Director may approve up to 30 square
feet of sign area depending upon the type of event, building design and right-of-way
frontage.
CHANGE: Presently temporary signs other than grand opening signs are limited to
10 square feet within window areas.
(AMEND) 25.68.130
REALTY SIGNS
During a period of time when realty is offered for sale or rent, a sign so indicating,
not to exceed 3 square feet and four feet in height may be located on the property
facing each frontage. No real estate sign shall be located on a roof, project from
a building face or move in any manner. Any such signs shall be removed upon rental of
the property, or upon close of escrow. In addition, one rider not to exceed five
inches by sixteen inches may be installed at the bottom of the main sign.
CHANGE: Requirement for each sign to have Department of Environmental Services
approval and its own sticker has been deleted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Instruct staff to set date for Public Hearing to consider the proposed ordinance
amendments.
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68.310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
�xa�tpl no.1
LOT I LOT 2 • LOT 3 ? LOT 4 LOT 5
I I
• Business �
1 2 ur
3 4 5
r
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
exam
Business
1 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
J
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
L5xa?npC ne. 3
F
Business 3
1 2 .
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
businesses are located on a parcel this person gets nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 .because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square Soot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04.190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68.310 'to read: .Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68.310 (Cont'd)
E%Ffy
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed tie square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign. conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68. 310 as in effect on September 25, 1981., shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision to Section 25.68. 395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two or more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 'or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.68.260 One Sign Per .Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial .and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote .compatibilit/,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness".
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to penalize those who have complied .with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, .1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City's current
sign regulations.
I
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68.310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
6xam�l no.1
FLoT I LOT 2 • LOT 3 t N LOT 4 LOT 5 1
I
I
Business
I 2 3 4 5
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
exam
Business
I 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a .
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
a -
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
- 4exampl ne. 3
• Business 3
1 2 ,
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
.businesses are located on a parcel this person gets nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 .because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square foot comple.. signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address .all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04.190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68. 310 •to read. Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the buil.ding or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68.310 Cont'd
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed troi*e square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign. conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68. 310 as in effect on September 25, 1981 , shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision to Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two or more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.68.260 One Sign Per Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote compatibilit%,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness".
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to penalize those who have complied with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, -1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City' s current
sign regulations.
i
TO: CITY 14ANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68.310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
�xantpl no.l .
FLOT I LOT 2 • LOT 3 ? „LOT 4 LOT 5 1
I
:
Business
1 2 3 4 5
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
Business
I 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
t �•
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
-- L�xampl no. 3
L
3
2 .
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
.businesses are located on a parcel this person gets -nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 .because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because .it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square foot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04. 190 - Commercial .Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided .on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68. 310 'to read: Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68. 310 (Cont'd)
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed twapty=44ye square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign. conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68.310 as in effect on September 25, 1981., shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision -to Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two 6r more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above .accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes, a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.68.260 One Sign Per .Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote compatibilit/,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness".
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to_ penalize those who have complied with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, . 1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City' s current
sign regulations.
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68.310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
�x�ampl no.l
FLoT I LOT 2 • LOT 3 t LOT 4 LOT 5
• Business
I 2 3 4 5
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
Business
r
I 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
-- �xampl ne. 3
I
• Business 3
2 .
. ... ... ...
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
businesses are located on a parcel this person gets nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 .because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because .it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square foot complex signs. In the case or example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04.190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68. 310 -to read: Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a .sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
r <
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68.310 (Cont'd)
�f fy
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed trod4-*e square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All . detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign conformingto the requirements of Section
25.68.310 as in effect on September 25, 1981 , shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision to Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two or more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.68.`260 One Sign Per ,Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial .and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote compatibility,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness" .
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to penalize those who have complied with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, .1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City's current
sign regulations.
YL
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68.310 Freestanding Signs .does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
6xampl no.1
[LOT I LOT 2 • LOT 3 0 M 1• LOT 4 � LOT 5
•
0
• Business
1 2 3 4 5
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
lid,
Business
r •
1 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
-- L�xasnpl ne. 3
I
• Business 3
1 2 .
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
businesses are located on a parcel this person gets -nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 .because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must '
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because -it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square foot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04. 190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68. 31O ,to read. Freestanding signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
r
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68.310 (Cont'd)
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed tsre square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
0. All . detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign. conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68. 310 as in effect on September 25, 1981 , shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision -to Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two or more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.68.260 One Sign Per .Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote .compatibilit;,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness".
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to. penalize those who have complied with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, 1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City's current
sign regulations.
NCI
T0: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68.310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
exam no.1
LOT I LOT 2 •� LO�••• LOT 4 LOT 5 1
• I
I I
I
Business
I 2 3 4 5
y
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
Business
r
I 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
-- L`xasnpl ne. 3
I
' 3
Business
2 ..
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
businesses are located on a parcel this person gets .nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 .because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because .it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square foot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04.190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68.310 •to read: Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
r .
i
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68.310 (Cont'd)
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed to i*e square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign. conforming to .the requirements of Section
25.68.310 as in effect on September 25, 1981., shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision to Section 25.68. 395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two Or more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 'or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes. a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.M 260 One Sign Per..Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote .compatibilit%,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness".
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to_ penalize those who have complied with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, 1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City' s current
sign regulations.
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68. 310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
�xantpl nod
LOT I LOT 2 •—, LO�•M LOT 4 � LOT 5 1
• I I
• Business � '
I 2 3 4 b5
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
va -
Business
I 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:'
1
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
-- L�xafnpC no. 3
I .
• Business 3
2 .
... .a ...
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
businesses are located on a parcel this person gets .nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 .because of expansion 'of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because .it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square foot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25..04. 190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68. 310 *to read: Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68.310 (Cont'd)
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed tsve square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68.310 as in effect on September 25, 1981., shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision to Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two or more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities .in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.68.260 One Sign Per .Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter, and to promote compatibilit,,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness" .
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to penalize those who have complied with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, -1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City' s current
sign regulations. 1
_-........ur-..cam: ..a:F -.r' - '.. •....-.�........ .. -.... ....v....... �....�-...r-_.. .�....-.-...r.. .. .ds'�.� .... . .�....�.....m�i
a
TO: CITY 14ANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FR0M: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68.310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
f x�m�l no.1
FLoT I LOT 2 • LOT 3 t „LOT 4 LOT 5 1
• I I
Business
1 2 3 4 5
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
Business
r
1 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
3 - y♦
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
L`xasnpC yte. 3
F
Business
3
1 2 ,
Under present regulations allowing complex .signs only when four or more
businesses are located on a parcel this person gets nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because -it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square foot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address -all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04.190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided .on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68.31O 'to read: Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68.310 (Cont' d)
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed tali-ve square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign. conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68.310 as in effect on September 25, 1981., shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision to Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two or more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 or more".
The difference between the- two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above .accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.68.260 One Sign Per ,Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial .and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
mina;:e clutter and to promote .compatibilit�,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness".
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to. penalize those who have complied .with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, .1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City' s current
sign regulations.
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68.310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
FLoT I LOT 2 • LOT 3 C „LOT 4 LOT 5 1
I I
Business •
1 2 3 4 5
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
Business
I 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
-- LxasnpC ne. 3
I
Business 3
1 2 ,
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
.businesses are located on a parcel this person gets .nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 .because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must "
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because .it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than 15 square foot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04.190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68. 310 ,to read: Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
�f <
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68. 310 (Cont'd)
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed trope square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign. conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68. 310 as in effect on September 25, 1981., shall - be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision -to. Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two or more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above .accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities .in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.6M60 One Sign Per .Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote compatibility,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness" .
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to. penalize those who have complied with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, 1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City's current
sign regulations.
� vu
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68.310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
FOT I LOT 2 • LOT 3 C „LOT 4 LOT 5
• I
: I
:
Business
1 2 3 4 5
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
va -
Business
I 2 3 4 5
i
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
fir.. .
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
- 4exaMV40, n0.
F L' 3
Business
1 2 ,
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four or more
.businesses are located on a parcel this person gets .nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 .because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must '
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be ;pore than 15 square foot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04. 190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68. 31O 'to read: Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68.310 (Cont'd)
E:Ftj
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed to 'we square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign. conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68.310 as in effect on September 25, 1981., shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision to Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two dr more tenants are located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.68.260 One Sign Per .Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial .and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote .compatibilit/,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness".
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to. penalize those who have complied with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, .1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City's current
sign regulations.
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
REQUEST: SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS "FREESTANDING SIGNS" SEPTEMBER 29, 1981
As noted in the material sent to you on September 25, 1981 , Staff would be
working on the rewording of the freestanding sign provisions. Zoning Ordinance
Section 25.68.310 Freestanding Signs does not specifically permit standing signs.
The section merely prohibits free standing signs where more than one business
is located on a lot; and states "Where Authorized For A Single Business. . ." such
signs shall not exceed 12 feet in height. The Sign Ordinance does not contain
criteria as to when a freestanding sign shall be permitted. The following
illustrate the present regulations relating to both freestanding signs and complex
signs.
6xampl n0..1
FLoT I LOT 2 L0T 3 �•„ LOT 4 LOT 5 1
I
I
Business
,
I 2 3 4 5
r ...
Each person could have a freestanding sign, yet:
Business
I 2 3 4 5
No one is allowed a freestanding sign, but the complex would be allowed a
15 square foot complex identification sign, or worse yet:
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE TWO
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
- LxalnpGe Ito. 3
F
• Business 3
I 2 ,
Under present regulations allowing complex signs only when four, or more
businesses are located on a parcel this person gets -nothing. Why?
1 . He has more than 1 business on a parcel .
2. He has less than 4 businesses on a parcel .
When example 2, becomes example 3 .because of expansion of a business, under
current regulations the 15 square foot complex signs become illegal and must
be abated. It is not legal non-conforming because .it did not become illegal
as a result of a change in regulations.
In the case of example 1 , the results are undesirable; in the case of example
2, the code could be termed unfair since in example 1 , each individual detached
sign could be more than lei square foot complex signs. In the case of example
3, the code could be termed as unfair.
The revisions set forth in this report should address all the cases identified.
Add to Section 25.04.190 - Commercial Complex - Two or more businesses shown
on a common Development Plan, Plot Plan, or Precise Plan of design functioning
as a unit, with common off-street parking provided on the property as an
integral part of the unit.
Amend Section 25.68.310 ,to read. Freestanding Signs
A. A building or commercial complex within the General Commercial
Zone with individual street frontage shall be allowed one double
faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for
tenant identification when the building or complex location or
configuration or topographical variation or other similar
circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the build-
ing but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and
location of either the Design Review Board, Planning Commission
or City Council .
B. The square footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be
counted; however, the square footage of such sign face shall in
no case exceed one-half the total allowable signage of the front
of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom.
SIGN ORDINANCE REVISIONS PAGE THREE
"FREESTANDING SIGNS"
Section 25.68. 310 Cont'd
`Ffy
C. The area of such signs shall not exceed tere square feet
per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet.
D. All detached signs shall be placed within a permanently
landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and
be architecturally compatible with the building or complex;
and not encroach in the public right-of-way.
E. Any freestanding sign conforming to the requirements of Section
25.68. 310 as in effect on September 25, 1981 , shall be
considered exempted from these provisions until such time as
the owner changes his sign copy.
Staff would also amend the proposed revision -to Section 25.68.395 - Building
or Building Complex Signs in the General Commercial District - To allow such
signs when two or more tenants are -located in the building. This is a change
from the proposed "4 'or more".
The difference between the two types of signs are that in the case of the
"freestanding" the area of the sign is subtracted from the allowable sign area.
In the case of the building or complex identification it is in addition to.
The above .accomplishes the following:
1 . Establishes. a procedure, criteria and development standard for
freestanding signs.
2. Eliminates potential inequities .in the present ordinance between
complexes on single and multiple parcels.
3. Implements the intent of Section 25.M 260 One Sign Per .Complex
which states:
"The predominant idea in authorizing signs
in the commercial .and industrial zones is
to strive for one sign per complex to eli-
minate clutter and to promote .compatibilit/,
proportion, simplicity, and sign effective-
ness".
4. Continues to allow a 12 foot maximum height of these signs so as
not to penalize those who have complied .with current requirements.
This inequity of the proposed revision was brought forth at the
Council Hearing of September 24, .1980.
5. Would grandparent in anyone who conformed to the City's current
sign regulations.