Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTT 8237 DEEP CANYON ROAD RESIDENTIAL 1977 environmental Jmpact le"Port PRERM SUBDIVISIOR JULY 1976 0 prepared for U. S. LIFE SAVINGS & LOAN Prepared by Rowland Sweet Rowland F. Sweet Real Estate Development Consultant 73-535 Pinyon Street �• Consulting Services Palm Desert California 92260 • Real Estate Packaging Market Studies Telephone 714-346-9401 Development Concepts Marketing Techniques Land Planning Operations Management Architectural Consultation Financial Consultation Project Pro Forma July 21, 1976 City of Palm Desert City Hall, Prickly Pear Square Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Mr. Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services Re: Parkview - A proposed residential subdivision of Residential Neighborhood 3, City of Palm Desert Gentlemen: The attached Environmental Impact Report is sub- mitted herewith providing informational documents for consideration in assessing the impact in-r.the City of Palm, Desert of the proposed residential project. Ve ruly yours,, Rowland F. Sweet RFS/mj Enc. Southern California Correspondent for C.G.O. Enterprises, Inc. Land Acquisition, Improvement&Construction Financing PARKVIEW A Residential Subdivision ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT JULY 21, 1976 PREFACE The Draft Environmental Impact Report contained herein was- prepared by Rowland F. Sweet, Real - Estate Development Consultant, 73-535 Pinyon Street, Palm Desert, California. This report was prepared in accordance with the guidelines of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and subsequent Amendments thereto, and pursuant to instructions of Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, letter of July 8, 1976. Reference to and consideration of the Palm Desert General Plan and subsequent Environmental Impacts Reports issued by the Environmental Services De- partment, City of Palm Desert was made and sections thereof incorporated into this Report. Rowland F. 51deet • TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT III. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING A. Natural Environment 'B. Man-made Environment IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. Natural Environment 1. Topography 2. Seismic and non-seismic geology 3 . Vegetation and wildlife 4 . Open space 5. Air Quality 6. Climate 7. Mineral resources 8. Hydrology B. Man-made Environment 1. Land use 2. Social impact 3. Economic impact 4. Transportation 5. Aesthetic' impact , 6. Urban infrastructure 7. Noise 8. Archeological sites TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 V. ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED VI. MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED TO MINIMIZE THE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT VII. ALTERNATES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT VIII. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT TERM USE AND LONG TERM USE XI. IRREVERSIBLE OR IRRETRIEVABLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES X. GROWTH INDUCING IMPACT OF THE PROJECT I. Introduction. This report is designed to fulfill the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (C.E.Q.A. ) , and amended State Guidelines, for the implementation of CEQA, effective January, 1975 and the City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution Number 74-14 , which mandates that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be prepared for discretionary projects whose cumulative impact may be considerable (Section 6) . This EIR is an informational document to be used in evaluating the environmental aspects of the proposed project. As such it "may not be used as an instrument to rationalize approval of a project, nor do indications of adverse impact ennunciated in an ERI require that a project be disapproved. " The Palm Desert General Plan adopted by the City of Palm Desert (Resolution No. 75-2) January 20, 1975 and the General Plan Elements, the EIR and the City goals and objectives have been considered in this report. Rather than duplicate the extensive data of the General Plan, frequent references to the General Plan, where pertinent, are made. For clarity of reference brief summary state- ments are made herein covering the portion of- each Element that is considered applicable to the proposed project. Each such summary and reference is- followed by the General Plan designation and the page number. -1= ----------------- Q—TU L115 ANO LII!/' � — -,I_�_ -�; ��_✓ '• , � C � Ran•cn Re. •T/IOUSAND fALtll: J /I`�` •1's:�-- /J✓ Fl I.MCDILAL HTtR r Of THE I UEr CwT P,,,�; G �rIL»I�p. r--I D�S�lil`� nl RT G ' \� PAIIA DESE I i'\ I � pI � PLANNING AREA-1� �LIVINO'ESDESERT � L_.y COACHELLA THERMAL \ V rw"-------J ^HECOA OP YOM )TI Exhibit 1 -2= Well '• : Well pop nn� lnl� i I I' O ` A Well Proposed P o_'Lj ct Water River 0 No O COLF Cr u' Park I, t J ( '•• ,� _ - .... n Well Well 17'. 17 n Trailer�I i • '� 'ne-•-�_-_._ �. C Parkl i li • • e • 00 1 II a 7( R R., W wEW �� '/f�R:,W I91I —•_ '�follrK. I t,• i,,••• , • tl PO �� tOf Thr blu n � •1•,•�r .. •Jt• —_, •_l�_ (FREE NL EAF I/B$ R_OAD .. •, , — u w w Well '•• 200 :il JI O ^a Y \� N. '� •� ``• , �/:.�: mil'=1�•:.' � �• Well"u __. _ • • V 21 c. '• 1; • .-1.: ir9• ••e -?2/ I.L \�.�• I�1.,•..ai--_��17i p' '.• -♦j __" ' r •i 'as r.= 'r i� -r-r r r r .� o -r• r- .. i .. B 191 n •-�• . _—_ �a ' ,• �,•1 • ,��'BM ' �, ' K--palm �3B 243 Il a:aed: La:. 2fl. l 'Z�3 -a i r • - J�--_-_ _--- ---- .. _ • ���•� _� �ry O ♦ • ��- ..- •'-•♦ ��i i/ ORIVf_ l.� l , tY El I• '�...J'.`:�t-^^•iJeSert 1.' ==rc== ,.•...'•• wt ..Well: ,��a� '�a`��• ' '��_71 Palm Degert 360 320 o`'3 ~ � \ _D-? O Wat9CO U R S E0 — � 2Water 8 w .�, r 'L . '��� __ a 'I. •Q •' � ��\ --� 1, l/ :cr.,•� x Water \ Tank '••••• Exhibit 332 Wa �.. n u V� s��• 1 PxoPosm SALE C PROJECT • \ R D seo IRDO N I \ CI V V RD. 1 j y _ti Q RVTLE DGF' ,, Parts u r COLLEGEOF THE < tt w Q `v cHOL[9 f f,J✓ED4 P� DESERT mcru� el m 0 \\V\ 4 � RR00 • 4 Q �'fi LARpp D BRUA1wwe.6v�-�S 1r-11 : 2 Rg4C40 0.0. I--I ORIAN 1 I NF Q 1 1uu�'JI 1 L�J95T_ ER va. r—al_JI N 11��-� 1 I/_�—� d4TR AVENUE OL o Z J.5 y f s....c<w wwT SOnIO 1050 W rim "T.""_I w� ea to lino wa uLia Sd ( ®�� OUAE�✓.A I .•/l LL v,c 7 l_ _J 3 L_(�� e�© f • U F vA sA ya(1��1 �s !o at al— ? H O 1 S 7 RANCYO 41 JI sE! 3 Wks a JP 0 B 9a 4n Y WOli oe OnZO 0 1 QIW s %If 1 R rl m _Lo son, r B D u c In Gorgonio Dy nn sw9y 0 rrs( IIIID S a DT ba .RIH✓ 'tA�t w E e C • �I C! I!1 AI.GssAAD O T'a'f-.'�'f O�� ° Q 2 N e ATE j{IG-h-WA1T——TT--1-----� WZ 2 W t' EL CsK1iND JDWI+ R N DRIFTry D DR. O U Q ,.V. A/T H>YA ST O ] qP GANDLE WD. O STR6G •� C[ `dll RBiT C SHAOow REAVFRTPII- 5,Q a j A, LwRE S HICORY ^ C41C0 RY fT, peDDER ZREE aRIVE aD juniper street ✓EOGE4JG TRC! O Q �' °V F f I�0O ROSi! A GDSR� ; z i oZ m pinyon street i vEv- i veR- rucrRc cE : 1 HOREGO F 0' ironwood GRASS a}!99} [,r FAIRw4 Y GAI WPY O 0 - il °°�FNECKof E toR�G I 1 rRAlh o O 0 00<w F v ITTI d V ar O , W J � OL��flalTE y,a 5liilMri I e. IJ/�/ <� 8, o 111 I Lb I/tJ EGNFOR.<L <✓" U' a 1j lk 2 ; yP /1 G4AOEV/NE STREET `� -IT • \\`, y Q4�^/ �, W/<GOW - 6TREET �I C%•r_�/l� 1111 G A" 1A -A '°''/ i'I� 1oR a ._4:z LSOMCRA ROAD 5/CSTA T4. �i S KY wARO WAY ISVN<�i_„'Y�v _ l BEC A/R RO. If-�MDOW-/-TR'LpR Ab ' af . Map of The City Palm ------ Tel-,J eY y{'i Y +A✓/.n II A_ARROW tp��TRA/L 111 TR. C m�ie✓ Q VTR/RTAyP�r_TEATNER.I Oi' J ` showing the 16oation • Q u4. 7 I qv��'; RA/L_- m ;, of the L w✓" .J 91/A PORTO LA AVE. 1. � -A V/GW OR. i/� _ /i U Proposed Project. v A� T_ 11 7 �lL /N 1 RORTOLA 4YE. /, GD F O UUU♦.o 'a'� _� _; 9Q� O/`'TAEG OR/Vp� 1 1 c.✓.c.wp. S>•RAMwA--R Exhibit 4 'P< �y -5- STpKM vN �F< I ;! F I GURE I I II •--•__ �� Proposed I Project I 2: Al r , . J CITY OF PALM DESERT , Exhibit 5 -- - -6- -49- II. Description of the project. This EIR has been prepared to consider a proposed project covering fifty four (54) more or less acres and which when completed will contain one hundred eighty five (185) single family detatched residences . The proposed project is to be located within the City of Palm Desert, Riverside County, California. The City encompasses an area of approximately eight and eighty six hundredths (8 . 86) square miles located along the southerly edge of the central portion of the Coachella Valley near the intersection of State Highway 111 and State Highway 74. The City lies entirely within Township 5 South, Range 6 East, beginning at the San Bernardino base and meridian. Within these City limits the proposed .project is bounded on the West by Portola Avenue, on the North by the proposed extension of Magnesia Falls Road, on the East by an exten- sion Deep Canyon Road and on the South by residential lots No. 1 through 31 inclusive of Tract 2529; lots No. 115 through 121 of Shadow Village Unit No. 2; lots 21 through 28 of Tract 2482 . The Southeast corner of the proposed project is bounded by the property of the Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of San Diego (Sacred Heart Church) . The proposed project area in its major portion consists of a rectangle lying Southwest of the juncture of the extention of Magnesia Falls Road and Deep Canyon Road, with a minor portion of the proposed project being irregular in shape and lying Southerly and Easterly of the Palm Desert Middle School. The irregularity of shape of the minor portionof the proposed development is the area abutting and adjoining the existing residential tracts No. 2529, tract No. 2482 and Shadow Village Unit No. 2. Location The site plan shown on tentative tract map 8237 delineates the street pattern, lot sizes, proposed utilities, setbacks in ac c ordance with the R-1 zone, proposed street grades, proposed street widths, vertical curbs and driveway aprons, and the adjacent City Park, Desert Sands Unified Schools, and the adjacent developed tracts. (Refer to Exhibit No. 2. ) Each proposed dwelling will contain a two car garage, providing three hundred seventy (370) off-street enclosed parking. In addition a minimum of three hundred seventy (370) guest or street parking spaces will be provided. Population Based upon the General Plan average family formation data for the City as a whole, the average family formation for the proposed project will range from 2 ,6 people per dwelling, to 3. 6 per family formation, per the 1976 Palm Desert census of Residential Neighborhood No. 3. Using an average between these two family formation figures, a probable total population for the completed project is five hundred seventy four (574) . (185 dwellings x 3.1) . -8- It is anticipated that the population inhabiting the pro- posed project will have social and economic character- istics generally similar to those families now inhabiting the adjacent residential areas, being Tract 2529, Shadow Village Unit No. 20 and Tract 2482 . (Refer to City census data under Section III.B.2 , hereof, page No. 20 and 21. ) Access and Circulation Access to the proposed project will be via Portola Avenue, designated by the General Plan as a secondary "major highway" which will carry traffic from 44th Avenue and from State Highway 111, both of which are designated under the General Plan as "major highways" . Additional access to the site will be via Deep Canyon Road, undesignated by the General Plan but of. a right-of-way width qualifying as a "secondary highway" . The project' s internal circulation system will consist of extensions of Rutledge Avenue, Desert Star Boulevard, Primrose Drive, and connections to the street extension of Magnesia Falls Road and the proposed extension of Deep Canyon Road. The general internal street design -is curvilinear with five short Cul-De-Sacs. Utilities and Service The utilities provided under the proposed plan will consist of water, electricity, gas, telephone, sanitary sewer and -9- television cable. All of the utilities will be installed underground. Domestic, irrigation and fire protection water will be furnished by an extension of the Coachella Valley County Water District lines to the tract for all lots except Lots. No. 57 and 65 respectively. These two lots lie within the franchise area of the Palm Desert Communty Services District and will be serviced with water by this District. Sewage will be collected and discharged into the CVCWD mains, being an extension of the sanitary mains from the north of the proposed project. Surface and storm waters will be collected from the run-off emanating from Rutledge Avenue, Desert Star Boulevard, Primrose Drive, and Florine Avenue via the extensions of these streets (provision for the transmission of surface water from the dead end of Florine Avenue) , and carried in the new streets of the proposed subdivision to a discharge point, at the Southwest corner of. the extensions of Magnesia Falls Road and Deep Canyon Road. From this corner surface waters will be discharged into the Whitewater River channel by an engineered drainage structure. Solid waste disposal will be by contract with the Palm Desert Disposal Service. -10- Police protection will be provided by the City of Palm Desert through contract with the Riverside County Sheriff 's office. Fire protection service will be provided by the California State Division of Forestry through contract with the County of Riverside. The El Paseo Fire Station is located 1; miles Southwest of the proposed project site. Natural gas will be provided by the Southern California Gas Company. Electric power will be furnished to the proposed site by " the California Edison Company. Telephone service will be provided to the site by the- General Telephone Company. Television cable will be furnished by the .Coachella Valley Television Company to the site. Relation to the General Plan and Existing Zoning The proposed project site is designated by the General Plan as a "Medium Density" area supportive of a density of a five to seven (5 to 7) dwelling units per acre. The existing zoning is R-1 . The proposed Tentative Map 8237 indicates a density of 3.426 dwelling units per gross acre. Phasing Based upon the market studies conducted by the developer, the phasing time for the proposed project is three (3) years, or an annual absorption rate . of sixty one (61) dwellings. -11- Objectives of the Project This proposed project is conceived to produce single family detached residences in the moderate price range which by site orientation, residential design, quality and land- scaping, will produce housing that will . be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Palm Desert General Plan. Drastic variations in density will be avoided (see "Objectives" page 1,G.1, of the Palm Desert General Plan) , land use com- patible with existing adjoining uses will be achieved, a fill-in of unused open space within determined City resi- dential areas will be accomplished. (See G.P. , page No. 1.P.1. ) The developer's market .study indicates that a shortage of good quality, well planned, moderate priced, single family detached dwellings exist in Palm Desert. The partial ful- fillment of this demand by the proposed project will tend to balance the existing housing potential of the City. (See Housing Element "Goals and Objectives" , page 4.G.1. ) The developer of the proposed project will assist in solving the "problem" posed in the Housing Element of the General Plan, page 4.B.3. , "first, there is a large number of people who cannot afford to live in Palm Desert; and secondly, since the City' s residents are basically of one economic class, the City lacks much of the diversity which comes ` from mixture of economic levels within a community. There -12- is a lack of a mix of housing price ranges" . The objective of providing energy conserving elements will include in the basic residential design incorporation of fully insulated walls and ceilings , windows protected by ample roof overhangs, weather stripped. exterior entrances areas and the use of florescence lighting in as many/of the dwellings as is consistent with available equipment and good lighting design. An optional energy package will include extra insulation, attic space mechanical ventalation, double glazed sash and air conditioner pre-coolers. As the developer will bear the cost of extending to and installing within the proposed project all of the required streets and utilities, accomplishment of adequate drainage, access and utility services at no cost to the City will be insured. The street system design objectives are: 1. To provide for the extension of existing adjoining and abutting streets flowing through the proposed site in a manner that will establish good access and circulation for the existing residents in the adjoin- - ing subdivisions and the new occupants of the pro- posed project, but will also discourage by the street -13- configuration, long continuous street sweeps that would tend to produce excess vehicular speeds. 2, To provide for transmission of irrigation and pre- cipitation waters developed from the existing dead end streets as well as to provide adequate drainage for the proposed project. . 3 . The proposed project contemplates adequate provision for establishment of wind and sand barriers by plantings at the Northern-most perimeter of the project. III. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING A. Natural Environment. Specific information on the natural environmental setting for the City of Palm Desert' is set forth in the General Plan and the EIR prepared for the City Zoning, Subdivision and Grading Ordnances,_ copies of which are on file in the Palm Desert City offices of the Department of Environmental Services. Conse- quently, this EIR will report only on such portions of the natural environment of the proposed project as may differ in any reasonable substance from the data developed for the City as a whole. 1. Topography The surface area of the proposed site is rela- tively level but with a moderate incline to the -14- Northeast consisting of about eight to ten feet of fall from the Southwest portion of the site to the Northeast portion. Refer to Figure 6. 2 . 1. , page 6.2.B.i .a. , General Plan, "Flood plains and drainage" , the proposed project area is not subject to flooding. Under present conditions, Rutledge Avenue, Desert Star Boulevard, Primrose Drive and Florine Avenue discharge irrigation and precipitation run-off from tract 2529, Shadow Village Unit No. 22, and tract 2482 , into the open, undeveloped area that is the site of the proposed development. Standing water, mosquito breeding grounds and a proliferation of weeds result from the present dead-ending of these streets and the accumulation of surface water in the site of the proposed project. 2. Seismic and Non-Seismic Geology. This particular site does not represent any significant variance from the seismic data developed in the General Plan Environmental Impact Analysis, page E.8. , and in the heretofore referenced City EIR. Refer- to page 6 .3.B.7. , Environmental Elements of General Plan. -15- Data on non-seismic hazards as presented in the Public Safety Element, 6.2 , of the General Plan has been considered in this report and is referenced herein. Some influence of blowsand is apparent from time to time at the North and Northeastern portion of the proposed project . This exposure is relatively light and is desig- nated as "Light" in the section "Wind erosion hazard and severe slopes" . (Page 6,2 .B.l.b, Figure 6 .2-2) 3. Vegetation and Wildlife Detailed descriptions of native Palm Desert vegetation and various wildlife habitats presented in Element 6 .5 of the General Plan have been con- sidered in this Report. The proposed project site is covered with sparse vegetation comprised mostly of weeds. No endangered species of either flora or fauna enhabit the proposed development. 4 . Open Space The Open Space and Conservation Element 6 .4 of the General Plan in conjunction with the other components -16- of Environmental Element 6 . , presents the criteria for preservation of Open Spaces in the City. The - General Plan designates the proposed site for medium density residential use. The City has provided open space and recreat.:ioxi 1.1) the immediate vicinity in the form of six acres of Palm Desert Community Park which abutts and adjoins the proposed development on the West. Within the area of the Desert Sands Unified School District, Lincoln Elementary School and the Palm Desert Middle School, a total of eight acres are committed to open space use, four acres of open playground and a four acre Little League field. Additional Potential recreational area consists of the Whitewater River Channel which abutts Magnesia Falls right-of-way to the North of the proposed project. The General Plan proposes this area for future hiking, bicycling and equestrian uses. A Date Palm Reserve is established on the East side of Deep Canyon Road. -17- 5. Air Quality. The General Plan EIR, Section 9, page E. 5. presents a description of the air quality of the Coachella Valley. These air characteristics are substantially identical for Palm Desert and the data therein is incorporated in this .Report by reference. 6. Climate. The EIR, Section 9, page EA. , describes the climate typical of the City of Palm Desert. This data is incorporated herein by reference. 7. Mineral resources. No economically viable mineral resources are found within the proposed project site. 8. Hydrology. The hydrology of the Coachella Valley and for Palm Desert is set forth in the EIR of the General Plan, page E. S. , and the "Summary of Ground Water Quality" , page E. 6. , and is incorporated herein by reference. B. Man-made Environment. 1. Land Use. Residential Neighborhood No. 3 (page No. 6) shows existing development and the now open space site of the proposed project. Palm Desert's 8 .86 square miles .has a variety of -18- land uses, including single family residential development, retail and service commercial, pro- fessional offices, possible uses for agriculture and vacant land. Figure 7 "Existing land use inventory" , page 21 of the EIR General Plan amendment -01-75 shows the relative use of land spaces in Palm Desert. As of July, 1976 it is estimated that there are approximately 6500 dwelling units within the City of Palm Desert. Single family residences comprises the largest segment with approximately 46% of the total. The remaining dwelling units are divided among condominiums (approximately 21.6%) , apart- ments (17.6%) , and mobile homes (14.8%) . 2. Social •Impact. Reference is made to EIR -4 .B.1 . , page E.10. , and to Element No. .3 Population and Economics for the General Community Make-up. The social make-up of Residential Neighborhood No. 3 is reflected in the age, places of employment, income strata and other demographic characteristics of this area as indicated by the 1976 City census, as follows: -19- (a) - Housing units 218 (b) Permanent residents (196 @3 . 68) 721 (c) Seasonal residents (22 households @2 .1) 46 Total population 767 (d) Median age of permanent population: 26 years. (e) Employment locations: Palm Springs/Cathedral City 20% Indio/Coachella �2% Rancho Mirage 6% Palm Desert 55% (f) Population under 18 years: 288. (g) Value of homes: 4% rent @$250/$300 per month 3% rent @$300+ per month 23% own dwellings valued at $25,000/$35 , 000 45% own dwellings valued at $35, 000/$45 , 000 7% own dwellings valued at $45,000 and up (h) Source of income: 7% retired 10% are the owners of private business 12% construction workers 34% are service personnel 7% government -20- (i) Income: 4% less than $5, 000. 00 11% $51000/$101000 14% $10, 000/$15,000 42% $15,000/$25,000 14% $25, 000/$35, 000 3% $35, 000/45,000 1% $45, 000 and up (j) Schools: The following information was supplied by the the Desert Sands Unified School District Administrative Office: Lincoln Elementary School provides .for education of children in the 3rd through 5th grades, and the Palm Desert Middle School provides for children from the 6th grade through the 8th grade. Both of these schools are located adjoining the proposed project site. (See Exhibit No. 2) Kindergarden through 2nd grade schooling is pro- vided by the Lincoln Elementary School on Portola Avenue approximately one mile North of the pro- posed site. Indio High School provides for the 9th :through the 12th grades. -21- The Desert Sands Unified School District bus system picks up students at the proposed project site (Tract 2529, Shadow Village Unit No. 2, and Tract No. 2482 abutting and adjoining the proposed project site) . Bus capacity is ample and this transportation to and from the area to the Lincoln School and Indio High School is free of charge. 3. Economic Impact. Reference has been made and the data considered that is set forth in the. Population/Economics Element of the General Plan, page 3.i.1. , through 3.B.12. , inclusive. The criteria established by the Population/Economics Element is in major part concerned with avoiding early public investment for extension of public facilities and service areas, and to develop industrial and commercial uses to provide tax income for capital investment of facilities serving residential development. Other criteria are, avoidance of too early development of selected prime areas and to monitor the variety of factors relating to growth to prevent excess costs to the City. -22- The goals established by the Palm Desert General Plan under the "Population Economics Element" (refer to page 3.G.1. ) are: To ensure viability of the economy of Palm Desert and to prevent large public expendi- tures for renewal in the future. To ensure that revenues will meet expen- ditures and provide a high level of services without burdensome level of taxation. To provide for "Life Cycle" possibilities in housing, so that all persons in the community may have a full range of social contacts. 4 . Transportation. The Circulation Element, pages 5. i. 1. , through 5.P.2. , inclusive of the General Plan has been con- sidered and made a part and portion of this study by reference. Of the three major goals enunciated in this Element, the most significant in relation to the proposed project is "To minimize the potentially adverse effects of transportation such -as traffic accidents, . noise and air pollution, upon the surrounding environment. " 5. Aesthetic Impact. Aesthetic impact is a personal judgment of visual -23- appeal and is not a technical assessment. The General Plan, however, sets forth some of the objectives to maintain the established character of Palm Desert and to enhance the existing environ- ment. (Refer to the Urban Design Element of the General Plan, pages 2.I.1. , and 2 .G. 1.) Data contained in the EIR Element, pages E.11. , and E.12 . , has also been considered and incorporated herein by reference. 6 : Urban Infrastructure. The demand for utilities for Residential Neighborhood No. 3 is set forth in figure No. 9-3, "Impact on Urban Infrastructure, Residential" , page E.12.a, of the EIR Element of the General Plan. The current demands of existing neighborhood plus the normal future anticipated growth forcast for Residential Neighborhood No. 3 is anticpated to be . satisfied according to the various public utilities now serving this area of Palm Desert. Funds required for future school and utility growth as anticipated by the General Plan will be derived by future revenue sufficient for the development of both new infrastructure and public facility needs at complete development. -24- 7 . Noise. The major 'production of noise is created by com- bustion driven vehicles. Vehicle noise impact in this primarily residential area is at present relatively low and within a "normally acceptable" range level. (Refer to figure 6.1.B.l.a. , Environmental Element of the General Plan. ) Traffic volume in the Residential Neighborhood No. 3 is at maximum for this area on Portola Avenue which carries a current "Peak Vehicle per Hour" of 860 (1976 estimate by traffic engineer, County of Riverside) Northward of 44th Avenue, this VPH volume declines progressively. Relating this peak VPH load and the residential speed limits to Figure 6.1.2. , of the Environmental Element of the General I Plan, a relatively low level of noise is indicated on Portola South of 44th Avenue. Within the residential areas the traffic noise factor reduces substantially and it is within "normally acceptable" levels. 8 . Archeological Sites. The proposed project site has been surveyed by Mr. Steven McWilliams, Associate Professor of Anthropology, College of the Desert. The field inspection resulted -25- in discovering no evidence of archeological signifi- cance. At the Northwestern portion of the proposed project, adjacent to the Desert Sands Unified School District boundary, some small pottery shards were discovered, but this area had been so completely disturbed that no useful preservation was possible, according to Professor McWilliams. -26- V. ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WHICH CANNOT BE AVOIDED. With reference to Section 5 of the EIR, General Plan, page E.14. , certain of the enumerated adverse effects will result from the development of the proposed project. 1. Increased air pollution. 2. Increased traffic and neighborhood occupancy will create higher noise levels than now exist in the undeveloped open spaces. Temporary adverse effect of the proposed project will be increased traffic and noise due to the construction work. 3. Demands for infrastructure uses will create an additional load on the infrastructure facilities. 4. The proposed development will remove approximately fifty four (54) acres of existing open space between the residential areas to the South of the proposed project and the Whitewater River channel to the North. 5. Consumption of non-renewable energy resources: Use of electricity for power equipment, temporary construction site lighting, lighting and cooling of model homes. Use of petroleum products for powering construction vehicles. Use of water for grading, concrete mixing and placing, reducing energy capacity by the demand for production and transmission of such water supplies. -27- Use of site telephone equipment for sales and construction offices will consume electrical energy. -28- VI. MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED TO MINIMIZE THE ADVERSE ENVIRON- MENTAL IMPACT. Referring to the adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided under Section V herein, the following mitigation measures are proposed: 1. Factors tending to mitigate air pollution: While the issue of air quality is of major concern throughout the State, County and City of Palm Desert, it is difficult to analyze with accuracy the degree of air pollution that may be attributable to the proposed project. On the basis of the developer' s phasing plan some estimates can be generated that will in an approximate way indicate the relative amount of air pollution that may result from the proposed project. It is assumed herein that combustion driven vehicles are responsible for the major part of air pollution in the Palm Desert area. Thus other sources of pollution are considered relatively insignificant and are not alluded to herein. The present City population is 12,770 with 6,500 dwelling units, and City growth rates are projected at approxi- mately 440 residents per year increase (within City limits) or about 200 new dwelling units per annum. (Refer to SCAG population projections of 14 ,540 residents of Palm Desert by 1980 from the current population of 12,770) -29- On the basis of present number of dwelling units, 6,500, plus about 200 additional units in 1977, the first increment of the proposed project of 61 dwellings will contribute .0091% of the total City vehicular emmissions. Upon completion of the proposed project in 1980, the ratio of emmissions, will be .0253% of the total City emmissions. The foregoing data is furnished only for a relative comparison of the degree of percent increase in vehicular emmissions created by the proposed project. While air pollution is primarily" linked to vehicular emmissions and therefor not subject to much mitigation as long as the public depends on combustion driven vehicles for basic transportation, the proposed project by its location, will reduce in some degree the amount of air pollution. The air pollution reduction for the proposed project is based on (a) proximity to the Lincoln Elementary and Palm Desert Middle Schools. The farthest distance any child in the proposed project will be from these schools i-s approximately two City blocks. Thus no vehicular transportation will be required to serve the proposed project's school age children for the 3rd through the 8th grades. -30- (b) The proposed project is centrally located and within reasonable walking distance of the College of the Desert, churches and the Urban Core area of the City which contains the major shopping facilities of the City. This location is conducive to walking, bycyle riding and the use of golf carts, thus eliminat- ing vehicular emmissions to the degree that these alternate transportation methods are employed. (c) Amelioration of wind and blowsand conditions will be created by screening plantings at the North boundary of the proposed project to control wind and sand effects. (d) Temporary adverse impact of construction air pollution will be mitigated by compliance with the City grading and other ordnances controlling construction, but particularly as to ground watering to reduce dust. -31- 2. Factors that will tend to mitigate the impact of in- creased traffic and noise: Traffic Mitigation Access to Residential Neighborhood No. 3 is currently via 44th Avenue and Portola Avenue. 44th Avenue is designated in the General Plan as a "major highway" and Portola Avenue is designated as a "secondary highway" . The development of the proposed project will open up a third major avenue of access to residential neighborhood No. 3 by the extension of. Deep Canyon Road. The developer advises that the Catholic Bishop of. the San Diego diocese will participate in irnprovc- ment of Deep Canyon bored on that portion of th n ;,L're o abuLLinil Lhe church 1,ropo :Ly. 'i1w eluvnaopor of the proposed project .will improve the portion of Deep Canyon Road abutting the Bast line of the pro- posed project. Thus the improvement of a minimum of one-half the right-of-way is assured. The developer has received ;,ome indicutionr., dolt property owners on the Last side of Deep Canyon Road -32- may participage in the full street width improve- ment. i4 Deep Canyon Road is undesignated by the General Plan, but is of a right-of-way width that qualifies as a "secondary highway" . It is anticipated that the addition of this third major access to residential neighborhood No. 3 may carry approximately one-half of the proposed project and traffic/some portion of the traffic to the existing i neighborhoods. One of most significant traffic aspects in relation to the proposed project is enunciated in General Plan Circulation Element, pages 5.i.1. , through 5.P.2. , "to minimize the potentially adverse effects of traffic accidents, noise and air pollution, upon the surround- ing environment" . The site design of the proposed project contributes to this goal in the following manner: A. Traffic flow developed by the street design tends to reduce traffic accidents by. the use of only one "four-way" street corner which is located at the intersection of "A" Street and Desert Star Boulevard. All other street corners are "Tee" intersections. -33- B. No street sweeps through the entire project, thus eliminating the tendency for accel- erated vehicle speeds. Most of the proposed f project streets are short. C. The curved streets have very large radius providing good sight distance which tends to provide for vehicular safety. D. The relatively short streets tend vehicles to lower in-site traffic speed, thus reducing exhaust emissions and the lower speeds reduce automobile noise levels. E. Residential sites abutting Magnesia Falls and Deep Canyon Roads will have no entrance to driveways from these streets, thus providing a lower incident of traffic accident. The foregoing features of the site design tend to fulfill the goal of the General Plan that "utilizes transportation systems as a positive element of design. " F. Referring to Exhibit No. 2, page No. 3 hereof, Florine Avenue is dead-ended with an engineered surface water "structure to carry drainage from Florine into the Cul-De-Sac at the end of "G" Street. The purpose of. not extending Florine is to prevent through traffic from the major portion of the proposed project. The extension of this street would tend to create a relatively high traffic discharging in 44th Avenue. -34- Additionally, extension of Florine Avenue would result in a poor lot pattern and would create a double frontage lot of existing lot No. 28 of Tract 2482. Increased traffic resulting from ingress and egress to the proposed project, once construction is com- pleted, will consist primarily of light passenger type vehicular useage of residents. In addition, some heavier vehicles employed by utility companies s and service organizations will make periodic trips to the area. It should be noted however that the heavier service type vehicles now approach the pro- posed site over the entry roads, Portola, 44th Avenue and Deep Canyon Road, in order to service a substan- tially larger residential area than the proposed project, being Tract 2529, Shadow Village Unit No. 2 and Tract 2482. The development of the proposed project is not likely to increase service type trips numerically to any great extent, but merely to extend the time they spend servicing within the internal street system of the existing tracts plus the proposed tract. -35- At the present time entry to the existing tracts adjoining the proposed project area are from 44th Avenue and Portola, however, upon completion of the proposed project, Deep Canyon Road will be extended to the Southern Boundary of the Whitewater River Channel (Intersection of Magnesia Falls Road and Deep Canyon Road) thus some portion of the traffic to the existing tracts may take the' Deep Canyon route. A substantial portion of the traffic flowing to the proposed project will take• the Deep Canyon Road approach as it will represent the _ quickest route to the Eastern portion of the pro- posed tract. Traffic capacity for the present two-lane improvements on Portola is estimated by the Traffic Engineer for the County of Riverside at approximately 1, 000 Vehicles Per Hour (VPH) . Current loading is estimated at about 5, 000 Vehicles Per Day (VPD) . Peak VPH has been estimated at 860. Based upon the General Plan EIR, Figure 9-2 , pages E.8 and E. 9, seven (7) trips per day per family, the first increment of the proposed project would project approximately fifty (50) percent of the incoming and outgoing traffic over Portola. This would equal 214 trips per day. The Traffic Engineer's office estimates peak loading at about 20%, -36- or a peak additional load on Portola of 43 VPH. At the culmination of the entire proposed project the peak vehicle loading would be 129 VPH, or a total amount still within the present two-lane capacity of Portola. The City is currently undertaking an extensive road reconstruction program over the next several years to 1980 (See IV. B. 3. "Man-made Environment" section of the EIR, dated August 26, 1976, General Plan Amendment -01-75) . This road improvement program includes the reconstruction of Portola to a four-lane capacity which would result in 1600 VPH carrying ability. Noise Mitigation The location of the proposed project is approxi- mately 1,500 feet north of 44th Avenue and the intervening distance is covered with residences, trees and other growth to effectively baffle traffic noise reaching the proposed subdivision from vehicular East-West traffic on 44th Avenue. As noted under TRAFFIC MITIGATION of this report the internal street design of the proposed subdivision is such as to produce the minimum amount of in-tract noise by reduced vehicle speeds. -37- Lots No. 1 through 17 shown on Tentative Map No. 8237 of the proposed subdivision will experience, during school hours, higher levels of noise from the Desert Sands Unified School District than any of the other lots within khe proposed project . However, adjacency of these 17 lots to the school will produce little or no noise level after school hours. During the construction phases of the proposed project, noise levels will rise above normal for this neighborhood, but only during the permissable work hours established by the City. No noise will be created by the construction of the proposed project after City-established work hours. Note: In a letter, July 8 , 1976 from the Director of Environmental Services to U. S. Life Savings & Loan Ass'n. , special reference was made as to "Concerns regarding the impact of the proposed project on the existing neighborhood" . The effect on the existing neighborhood of traffic and noise mitigation is herewith supplemented by the additional mitigating factors: -38- A. Because the relative price structure of the proposed project will be in the same general price or value range as the dwellings existing in Residential Neighborhood No. 3, it may reason- ably be assumed that the economic strata of the purchasers of the proposed project dwellings will be in a similar economic bracket as the existing neighborhood residents. Social compatibility is generally similar in comparable economic brackets. As the general neighborhood' s physical en- vironment will, to a reasonable degree, be very similar in density, lot size and street patterns as the existing area, it appears logical to assume that the proposed project will be physically com- patible to the existing neighborhood. As the proposed project will provide complete underground utility structures, the aesthetic appeal of the proposed project should enhance the physical appearance of the neighborhood. B. The extension of the existing streets to carry through the proposed project to the Whitewater River Channel will eliminate the water now accumu- lated on the open, undeveloped site. Thus the neighborhood will be rid of standing water, potential mosquito breeding grounds, and excessive weed growth. -39- Consequently, the entire neighborhood will be enhanced as to livability and appearance. C. The proposed project will be constructed in small increments of about sixty one (61) dwellings per year, and thus the degree of nuisance created by development and construction that will impinge on the existing neighborhood will bein moderate degree. D. Due to the low profile of single story structures, a minimum of view blockage will appear for existing neighborhood. E. Due to the current shortage of moderate priced housing in the City limits, the development of the subject project may be expected to conform with the City goals set forth in the General Plan for "Provision of housing for varying income ranges and life styles throughout the City" , and fulfill the expectancy outlined on page E.10. of the Environmental Impact Report that "one of the General Plan primary goals is to create an organized social environment which will meet the needs of different family types and income. " Referring to figure 4-20 "Existing residential developments in Palm Desert" , page 4.B.l.b, of the -40- General Plan, of the projects listed, excepting the mobile home projects, there are only two single family detached housing projects, both of which are beyond the qualifying ability of 46.4% of the family wage earners of the City. (Refer to Figure No. 3-5, page 3 .B.3.a. of the General Plan. F. Reference has been made and the data considered that is set forth in the "Population/Economics Element of the 'General Plan, page 3.i.1. , through d.B.12. , inclusive. . The criteria established by the Population/Economics Element is in major part concerned with avoiding early public investment for extension of public facilities and service areas, and to develop in- dustrial and commercial uses to provide tax income for capital investment of facilities serving residential development. Other, criteria are, avoidance of too early devel- opment of selected prime areas and to monitor the growth to variety of factors relating to/prevent excess costs to the City. It should be noted that the cost of access and utilities extension to the subject tract is to be paid for by the developer and will not represent a burden on the community. -41- Analysis of the Economic Impact of the General Plan indicate that the balanced land uses envisioned under the General Plan will result in a stable economic base and that under these circumstances the economy of Palm Desert can be maintained at a high level. The proposed project appears to be in conformity with the objectives and criteria set forth by the -Elements of the General Plan, and it may reasonably be. assumed that the proposed project will therefore support and implement the City's growth patterns. The goals established by the Palm Desert General Plan under the "Population Economics Element" (refer to page 3.G.1. ) are: To ensure viability of the economy of Palm Desert and to prevent large public expenditures for renewal in the future. To ensure that revenues will meet expendi- tures and provide a high level of services without burdensome level of taxation. To provide for "Life Cycle" possibilities in housing, so that all persons in the community may have a full range of social contacts. Health, safety, welfare and the right of enjoyment are dependant to a substantial degree upon material resources, -42- production, consumption and distribution of goods and 'services. The life style of every individual within the community of Palm Desert is largely de- pendant upon personal economic resources and the economic resources of the community in which he resides. To estimate the economic impact on the community of Palm Desert of the proposed development, the follow- ing elements have been considered: 1. Price range for the dwellings in the proposed project. 2 . Probable incomes of the owners of residences of the proposed development. 3. How the community economy will be affected. 4 . Effects of the proposed project on the community tax structure. 5. Probable demand for increased capacity of the City services and the effect of such demand on the City budget. Housing Price Range The developer advises that dwelling prices will begin at about $36, 000.00 and range upward to a probable maximum of $42, 000. 00. Referring to Figure No. 3-5, page 3.B.3.a. , "Distri- bution of Family Incomes" , forty six and four-tenths percent (46.47%) of the total population of the City -43- of Palm Desert earned between $10,000 to $2.4,999 per annum. To qualify with a financial lending institution for a residential loan, an applicant buyer must have a net effective income varying with the particular lender from a minimum of three and one-half times to four times (32 to 4) the amount of the monthly debt service. "Net effective income" is considered the applicant buyer ' s gross income less any contractural obli- gations of longer term than ninety (90) days. Then if the hypothetical applicant residential buyer is purchasing an automobile at monthly payments of, say, - $100 per month, and a color television with the monthly payments at $50 per month, the aggregate of these monthly- payments for the year would be deducted from his gross income. Monthly debt service costs consists of return of principal, interest, real estate taxes and insurance based upon level amortization of principal and interest and the annual amount of taxes and insurance. To illustrate, assuming a minimum down payment on a $40,000 residence of five percent (5%) of the -44 purchase price, the remaining finance balance will be .$38,000. At current interest of nine percent (9%) , this balance amortized over a 30 year long period would require a monthly principal and interest payment of $305.76. Real estate taxes on a $40, 000 residence, esti- mated at $11. 00 per hundred, would total $1,045 per annum or $88 .00 per month. A normal insurance policy covering replacement cost of the dwelling for fire and hazard would cost (for a $40,000 residence) , approximately $180.00 per annum or $15. 00 per month. Thus in this particular illustration, the poten- tial buyer, of a $40,000 dwelling would have to have a net effective income as follows: Principal and interest $305.76 Real Estate taxes 88. 00 Insurance 15 . 00 Total residential debt service $408 . 76 $408 .76 multiplied by the minimum criteria standard of A times results in a net effective annual income of $17,167 . 92 . If the hypothetical buyer used in this illustra- tion had monthly payments totaling $150 . 00 per month, he would have to have a gross annual income of $18,967 to qualify for the $40, 000 dwelling. -45- If such a hypothetical applicant residential buyer were able to place a down payment of $10 , 000 (25% down payment) on the $40, 000 dwelling,' the-monthly income requirement would be reduced to a gross annual income of about $14 ,000. As has been noted herein, Figure 3-5, page 3.B.3.a. , "Distribution of Family Incomes" 46 .4% of the family wage earners of the City of Palm Desert earned between $10,000 per year and $24, 999 per annum. Referring to figure 4-2, "Existing Residential De- velopments - Palm Desert" , page 4 .B.l.b. , of the General Plan, of the projects listed, excepting mobile home projects, there are only two single family detached housing projects, both of which are in excess of a $50,000 purchase price and .are thus beyond the qualifying ability of 46.40 of the family wage earners in the City of Palm Desert. From this analysis it becomes apparent that there is a definite housing shortage in the community for single family detached dwellings in the approximate $40,000 range. The production by the proposed project of such moderate priced housing as may satisfy this market demand in Palm Desert will substantially contribute to the housing in the City. -4 6- Probable Income of Owners of Dwellings of the Proposed Project. Based upon the financial requirements to qualify for the real estate loans for the purchase of moderate priced houses, it is estimated that the annual income of residents of the proposed project will fall within the range of $14, 000 per annum up to $25, 000 with a probable mean of about $17 ,500 per year income. This income group at a mean of $17,500 per annum will gross each year a total (185 family heads at $17 ,500) of $3 ,237,500. 00. Three elements of income impact have been con- sidered: 1. Increase in spending for goods and services. 2. Augmentation of the City work force. 3. Increased City benefits by reason of increased City and County revenue. Goods and Services Sales data for Riverside County for 1976 (refer to the 1976 edition of the Rand McNally Commercial Atlas and Marketing Guide) shows the following statistics on a per capita basis: -47- Retail and Shopping Goods Sales $2,510. 00 Food Store Sales 543. 00 Drug Store Sales 93. 00 Hotel and Lodging 29.00 Personal Services 51. 00 Automobile maintenance and repair 34. 00 Miscellaneous repair services 16. 00 Total per capita $3,276 . 00 Due to the higher income levels per capita for Palm Desert versus the County of Riverside as a whole, the preceding estimates of annual per capita ex- penditures may be considered conservative. Assuming that the majority of the listed expendi- tures per capita will be spent within the City it is probable that- the local retail businesses may anticipate approximately -$1, 880,420. 00 per year of additional business resulting from the sale and occupancy of the proposed project. Augmentation of the City Work Force. Due to the price range of the proposed project and annual income required to qualify for financing of purchase, the proposed project may produce a majority of residents in the younger age groups. This income strata would tend to represent pro- fessional and technical workers, middle management, sales people, craftsmen and service people. This strata of population will contribute to a better balanced community as well as increase the depth of the area work capacity. -48- Increased, City Benefits by reason of increased tax, licenses, and fee revenues. On the short term, from the proceeds of the initial construction costs of the proposed project, those construction materials and services procured within the City of Palm Desert will increase City revenues by licenses, fees and sales taxes. On the long term, based upon Rand McNally, Marketing Guide and Industrial Index, 1976, "Riverside County Annual per Capita Expenditures" the residents of the proposed project will annually spend $1, 880,000 for goods and services. Approximately 44.5% of the Real Estate Taxes collected by the County of Riverside from the proposed project is allocated back to the Desert Sands Unified School District. When the proposed project is fully completed it is estimated that $212,460. 00 per year will be paid to the County in Real Estate Taxes, 44. 5% of which (94 ,545.00) will benefit Desert Sands Unified Schools and thus reflect a substantial benefit to Palm Desert Schools. -49- G. The portion of the proposed subdivision abutting the Palm Desert Community Park will be separated from the park area by a screening wall to provide privacy within the park and privacy for the residential lots backing up to the park. Only modest sized temporary tract signs are contemplated by the developer, with architec- turally designed permanent subdivision identifi- cation signs to conform with the goals enunciated by the Environmental Impact Report "Sign Ordnance" prepared by the City Department of Environmental 'Services April 8, 1976. H. Not only for the proposed project, but benefiting other adjoining areas will be the extention of water, sewer and street improvement facilities at no cost to the City. I. Development of this site will fulfill one of the General Plan objectives to "fill-in" open undeveloped areas contiguous to and within the confines of similar and compatible residential areas without inducing "urban sprawl" . J. The additional market for goods and services -so- added to the community trading base will substan- tially support nearby commercial centers, and benefit the merchants of the area, thus tending to bolster the City economy. K. The provision for moderate priced single family detached dwellings within the City limits will assist in broadening the base of citizen housing in the community fulfilling the General Plan objective of "providing a range of housing for varying income rnages and life styles" . (The moderate priced single family dwelling is in very short supply in Palm Desert and creates an imbalance in the community housing spectrum. ) L. The developer advises that the dwellings proposed for the subject project will provide maximum ceiling and sidewall insulation for this thermal area. Moderate fenestration with protective roof overhangs will be incorporated into the resi- dential design, thus contributing to the conserva- tion of energy. M. An "energy package" will be offered resi- dential buyers as an optional feature in which such -51- , intensive energy saving devices will be incorporated into the dwelling structure to reduce heating and cooling costs and thus conserve energy. N. Maintain community harmony of environment and social relationships by producing single family detached housing in the approximate same quality and price ranges as exist in the adjoining and abutting subdivisions. O. Elimination of soil erosion and neighborhood flooding by adequate channeling of surface water to the discharge point in the Whitewater River Channel. P. The surrounding property values will experience an increase, resulting from the upgrading of the open land area. Q. Improvement of the lead-in streets, the exten- sion of utilities, landscaping in the construction of dwellings, will contribute to increased values of the undeveloped properties on the East side of Deep Canyon Road. R. Elimination of .the existing neighborhood dead- end streets and the substitution of a fully improved neighborhood in the now open, uncultivated area of the proposed project site will tend to upgrade the adjoining residential area to the South. -52- 3. Mitigating Factors on demand for infrastructure uses: Schools The following information was supplied by the Desert Sands Unified School District administrative office: Based upon the present ratios of school age children to adults in the City of Palm Desert, the School District estimates that a probable maximum of one hundred eleven (111) school age children will be generated as a result of the proposed project of one hundred eighty-five (185) total dwellings in the fully completed project. This estimate is consistent with the City Census data. The 1976 City Census of Palm Desert shows Residential Neighborhood No. 3 (See Exhibit No. 5) with 218 children under 18 years of age. The 185 .residents of the proposed project when fully completed, will if it generates the same proportion of residents under 18 years as the existing residents of the area, produce approximately 174 children under 18 . Approximately one third of this number will be under school age resulting in 116 school age children. This number of school age children is relatively the same as the number estimated by the School District. -53- Based on the phasing program for the proposed project, the school system will receive a loading of 39 school age children each year of the three year construction and sales period for the proposed project. The School District advises that the number of children requiring schooling each year (approximately 37 per year, based upon the developer's estimate of project absorption period of three years) will fall within the normal growth pattern anticipated for the general area by the School District. The approximate breakdown for each annual phase of the proposed project is as follows: Kindergarden to 5th grade 18 students 6th grade through 8th grade 10 to 9th grade through 12th grade 9 to 37 students Students eligible to attend Kindergarden through the second grade will be bussed to Washington School located approximately one mile south of the proposed project on Portola Avenue. Bus capacity is ample and transportation by the School District is free of charge. Students in the 3rd grades through 5th grade will attend Lincoln School located on Portola Avenue adjoining the proposed project. High school students will be transported by bus to -54- Indio High School until such time as the new Palm Desert High School is constructed. The School District estimates that the new High School may be built and open for students within three to five years. Both the Washington and Lincoln Schools are nearing full capacity, however, the new Middle .School addition currently under construction will be com- pleted and operating prior to the first construction and occupancy of the first increment of the proposed project. Upon the opening of the new Middle School addition portable classrooms now housing students at the Middle School will be released providing additional capacity for increased enrollment at the Lincoln and Washington Schools. Utilities Demand for access and utilities extension to the pro- posed project is to be paid for by the developer and will not represent a financial burden on the City. The public utility companies furnishing the water, sewage, gas, electricity, telephone and TV service advise that the loads imposed by the proposed project are consistant with their anticipated expansion of normal growth for the area. -55- Drainage Drainage of surface waters from the existing sub- divisions will not be carried through one street of the proposed project but by the street drainage design will be diverted into several streets to spread transmission of the surface waters toward the discharge point at the Whitewater River Channel . Thus volume and water acceleration will be controlled tending to prevent excessive amounts of water in any one street during heavy precipitation. Water. . With reference to the increased demand upon the Coachella Valley County Water District for additional water capacity to serve the proposed project, Mr. Tom Levy of the CVCWD advises that within the water zone supplying the proposed project two major wells are in operation and a third well producing over 2 , 000 gallons per minute has been completed. Thus this zone now has adequate water production sources for some extended future time. With reference to the actual condition of long term basic underground water supplies, the General Manager- Chief Engineer of the CVCWD has stated, "It is our belief, based upon the best engineering we have been able to obtain from the U.S.G.S. and the renowned -56- Bechtel Engineering firm of San Francisco, that with the natural water, underground storage, and reclaimed water, our present water problem is not serious. " "In the past few years, in the Palm Desert area, the CVCWD has constructed millions of gallons of surface storage and drilled new wells to adequately assure meeting water demands" . (Letter dated March 10, 1975 to City Manager, Harvey L. Hurlburt attached to and made part of the August 26 , 1975 General Plan Amendment 01-75. E. I.R. ) Sewage Treatment Since the completion of the CVCWD sewage treatment plant at Cook Street an adequate treatment capacity for the entire service area of Palm Desert and other areas has been committed for and created. The addition of the proposed project to the sewage dis- charged to this new plant will represent a very minor fraction of the plant' s capacity. A service main 21" in diameter is pending construction. . This main will cross the Whitewater River Channel at the intersection of Magnesia Falls Road and Deep Canyon Road. This point represents the lowest point of the proposed project and sewage from this development will gravitate into the 21" main at this point. -57- Electricity The Southern California Edison Company advises that line capacity is available to the proposed project and that the generating capacity of the Coachella valley system is. adequate to provide electric demand. Due to the rising costs of electric generating fuels, the major impact of the subject project will be the increase in fuel demand for generation of that portion of the electrical energy consumed by the proposed project. This cost will be borne by the individual resident. Natural Gas The Southern California Gas Company advises that . domestic use natural gas to supply the proposed tract is available and no current evddence of unavailable domestic supplies is indicated. Humidity While the degree of humidity may ascend to some minor degree in the immediate neighborhood by reason of the proposed project, the over-all effects of. humidity will be negligible. 4. Removal of fifty four (54) acres of existing open space from the General Plan area: While the proposed site of fifty four (54) acres -58- now represents open space, the actual, recrea- tional use and condition of this open space should be considered. The entire area has no trees, no shrubs and is otherwise covered by a generous growth of principally tumbleweeds. This property has remained in this condition for many years and is not conducive to use in its unappealing and undeveloped condition. There is no evidence of any recreational uses of this property. Residential Neighborhood No. 3 with a total existing population of 721 permanent residents provides in the Palm Desert Neighborhood Park a six (6) acre recreational area. In addition the DSUSD provides a four (4) acre Little League Baseball Park and a four (4) acre open playground. These recreational 'facilities adjoin the proposed project. The proposed project is adjacent to the Whitewater River Channel as open space area of potential recreational useage. (Refer to "Land Use Element, " General Plan, Open Space, page 1.B. 4 . , and 1.B.7. The "Circulatory Element" , page 5 .B.2 . , states that "discussions with adjacent jurisdictions and -59- and private organizations indicate a desire to develop valley-wide, bicycling, hiking and equestrian systems, and the Whitewater River Channel seems to provide the major potential" . Thus, the Residential Neighborhood No. 3 has a recreational capacity as follows: Palm Desert Neighborhood Park 6 Acres Little League Baseball Field 4 It School playground 4 IT Whitewater River Channel potential --- Total 14 Acres Criteria established by the General Plan establishes 4.5 acres per 1, 000 population as the City goal for Park and Recreational open space. Upon the com- pletion of the proposed project Residential Neigh- borhood No. 3 will have 1,295 residents (721 in existing neighborhood plus the proposed project population of approximately '574) . The application of the Park and recreational open space criteria to this total future population of this neighbor- hood would require 5.83 acres of Park or open recreational area. Therefore, the developer of the proposed project does not plan any additional recreational area within the new subdivision but in lieu proposes 'to contribute to the City Park and Recreation fund in the amount of$9,108 . 00 (County Assessor's Market Value of $182, 160. 00 @5%) . 5. Consumption of non-renewable energy sources by the proposed project creates an irreversible impact for which there are no mitigating conditions: -60- VII. ALTERNATES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT. 1st Alternate - High Density. Based upon the General Plan designation of residential , use for the proposed project ,area, no alternate use other than residential is considered herein. As the ultimate density of the proposed project permitted under the General Plan is five to seven dwelling units per acre and the actual density proposed is 3. 426, an increased density, single family project could be con- sidered as an alternate. Such an alternate higher density project may produce lower priced housing, permitting a wider range of Palm Desert citizens to qualify for the purchase of residences. Use of such higher densities should require approval of a planned unit development or condominium as the minimum lot size designated by City ordinance for single family detached housing would not physically permit the indicated density of five to seven dwelling units per gross acre shown by the General Plan. However, use of a P.U.D. or condominium appears not to be compatible with the existing adjoining neighborhood environment and the close proximity of the Elementary and Middle Schools. -61- 2nd Alternate - Low Density, Residential A second alternate use' of the subject property for very low or low density residential project would not be either economically nor environmentally feasible. The necessarily increased price per dwelling unit would not -be compatible with the existing neighborhood inccue levels. Nor would the use of more expensive single family detached residences be compatible with the already characterized neighborhood environment . 3rd Alternate - No Project The site of the proposed project may remain undeveloped. In this event the cost of the extended utilities in this section of the City would be spread over a substantially smaller base and result in considerably higher unit costs which .possibly could require participation by the City in utility extension costs. Deferment of provision for moderate price, single family dwellings would delay the fulfilling of the objectives of the Palm Desert General Plan to provide a "range of housing for varying income ranges and life styles through- out the City" . A loss to the County of over $200, 000 annually in tax income would occur, with a loss of sales tax income, miscellaneous City taxes and fees, to the City of Palm Desert. -62- VIII. . RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT TERM USE AND LONG TERM USE. Short Term ..Short term effects of the proposed project are principally the result of the construction of the land improvements and residential building. In clearing and grading, despite watering in conformity to the City' s grading ordnance, some dust will result. Noise of heavy earth moving equipment, cohcrete and materials trucks will contribute some nuisance and annoyance to the residents immediately surrounding the proposed project during the construction period. The foregoing adverse effects of the construction period are, however, quite short term and limited to daylight hours. Long Term Long term effects will be in the main advantageous to the surrounding adjoining existing residents and to holders of unsubdivided land East of Deep Canyon Road. Development of the unused land which is the site of the proposed project will remove this potential from the City's future development capacity. If, in accordance with the General Plan, the highest and best use of this particular site . is indeed medium density residential of a character -63- consistent with the already established neighborhood in this area, such use will fulfill the City' s growth plans for this particular area of the municipality. The type of moderate priced residential single family housing will fulfill a strong community housing need. As the development matures and the landscaping and trees reach full scale, the proposed development will, like similar City subdivisions, increase in value. Such increase in value will provide a sound investment for the citizens of the community. As has been noted elsewhere in this report, the establish- ment of 185 new families in the community will support and stimulate the retail and service economy of Palm Desert. An undeterminable portion of the new residents of the proposed project may be new citizens of Palm Desert and contribute to the management, services and labor pool of the City. The proposed moderate price range of the subject develop- ment will tend to attract some younger people and thus . create a balancing effect on the current preponderance of the population of Palm Desert of more advanced ages. The moderate price ranges may also attract retirement people -64- C✓acontl — — -— iEK.Wi /b c� --- - - /ft4 ACY4 Pllf !PO tb/mvrnvtdro,§— kd- T fTa�oa�lA' lds za - —�� �� r�l + ',T dw .i q.�w . v � „• ° J - t � ',1 6re4o•+4c;-76S";AGE.f dEAX ' �`�' W�l �f F 1/�or 11 dA)eJ aISFe � affl/t 177 I— \l76 �� z r / e: .f�4:y. o - n -!9! (/+•.r.�JEII�Y/�b; QSlI� +C�J o-:. th z TW`"#?-W.-i'4,k•, 185 k/s. -. ' ' �`�r �`� I 401 4xxru/ VeiI Co. Y 1 PALM DESERT GDMHUNl7Y PARK ! I T ,� I tio0 Vtwale- CVUNG f?XfD(la{100zi, ) ar.c V nic,� lrsc too f,o w - GI GWO. Sa ffe�y Strnf 4 4 ,,�, { f � r -- I O� � •`�' fast /ix olyurce/[onreye✓1 __ m° 50 �^e Mlof�-1 /(/ - /ilp7ie Schm/ ✓is/i.cf Dy OeeJ - - �. 11 y I JJ - Ai 5�S- paw/ d5 E/r+r/_�W ' .�i'f+/a,F. ys y __ _—_ \_-_ -_ 'Prnpow JlnYl D.�ir lfi� a * ®' i 4l,,,,,dl �� 1d7Z9 I 3.AdJeael lids rldstb wf>g J1nAk /tsaddl � 9:R'o�ustJ.�✓ra�der Rllc fo. fttb /0I,/Of,t66 w!>9`i 1,'�_�7�1P J�', -;;,T I — - Yelhcd tabs(A;p/Ern►),ot,W/o I 10•Fprows ter, a* Tract 2W7. �¢ l34 . .Jf i7,ev eeavW 4.pw.9'7JF J ^ OI n 63 70 \ Z0 do `:a •r} '� . — fYtq 133 F-V r rr' o�A. 94 ' xrxere RILM DESERT MIDDLE $CNt70! rei:✓.. ',�,re vs:'nsl .V. ,l99/ \�. ;� ,[' ,Iy - - rs 9n ' L/NC 'N SCHOOL \ I . '{ // \ Ali �j �CC y �0 °o � 111 ( .!O 1_�PVs/ny fl*iI p+rPote' _ _ __ / \ �, //1/• /// j1 � I • >'1,.0 T�-t- t i— p 1 I � 70 ,I%n,el pore./ aw"tI febnoy .H,1944 od/v!Ne 9991 h f u SCAM/ 9,ylr cl Dy Geed ,��;� �+• 1 ' ! v r Y ,Lwrdeo' Ay7us/ to,/y67 as gg / a I i 1 w /sfr�nrr/ .@ Jd7t9. - �.8b s � •1C ��Q .} ; I ; ,� '_ a r 1 jet TL ED4E AVF 3 4 r� a .X°w!aM 4=-iI 14 566, ..,� IO o 90 p!� i � y QJ 41 74 Bo .537E 44 so T-RA T I 25291 I I�f �75 761LZ DESERT STAR BLVD. �; ( II �F :'j {�• 61 (~ 7� ! 50 01 50 '� ^! - �{pd4(/E!_�1- = tt , (I i j It r(+fs`10 �0 7Z I --- -- - -- p a/edre✓i.,a 9ro;wbar x� si osrxl -fydrm70 to S/TE x In 10 TZJ -19 /t 1.. .II vwwry IV) AE 15 29 fR/N Sr. 30 Q' r `4 li j O Icr h Cul-II ulily o� 57 'G/ a 7; I �a /s 'S �` , •� .•� -� is l ;i: Fx15f - 77 31 i --1 - -- I VELARDO DRIVE Xr ;Vk- APPRC:ALBY /� 6��✓,,p p FILE NO. 74.19d14r1 tl>1 TT�/W XT IMP T&L"T s �IaT PACIFIC RIM7!•89D F�.YFD.Y It ____—�__.___..__. __- :_ ___.._ _.—_ NE,ISffoEG C.oI_fNGIUFEi n0 - ... -,.�I. /�+/OD• CI•.4�° P� �1►I. ¢ ��. /V� / �� /\�f. � �N .``� R i�#; �,y:. Y. - - = ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD, iA!•6Kt ,,�CiCz.�, „r t r •Palm Desert, ,�ahf. fi �✓ NO I7EVIBIONi DATB BV DATE: . . COMMUNITY PLANNERS-DEVELOPMENT EfiGlNEERS ,��; w,,, ...ro who are financially substantial but do not choose or are unable .to acquire and support the more expensive residences typical of the country. club developments and the recreational projects oriented to tennis. (See Palm Desert 1976 housing census -- 7% of residential neighborhood No. 3 are retired. ) The diversity provided by the proposed project against the current, somewhat unbalanced population and housing mix of the community will tend to strenghten and improve the social and economic stability of Palm Desert. IX. IRREVERSIBLE OR IRRETRIEVABLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES Development of the site of the proposed project is an irreversible environmental change in that the open, unused land space would be transformed from one ownership into 185 individual ownerships and irreversibly committed to this particular residential use. The natural resources used for construction such as sand, rock and other natural materials, may be considered to be irretrievable and only partially renewable. Fuel, electricity and other energy sources consumed in the construction and development process will also be irretrievable. X. GROWTH INDUCING IMPACT OF THE PROJECT Short Term Growth Inducing Impact The proposed project will release several million dollars of funds for wages, materials and services during the construction and sales period. A substantial number of local vendors, service people, real estate people, sub- contractors and labor will benefit immediately. These expenditures will in turn stimulate the satisfaction of demand for consumer goods and services from the local recipients of these funds. Long Term Growth Impact The extent of long term growth inducing impact on the community will develop from: 1. The number of new community citizens the proposed project may attract. If a substantial number of purchasers of dwellings in the proposed project are new members of the community, their impact may be felt in increased purchases of goods and services, and in supplying additional personnel to the Palm Desert labor pool. . 2. Many of the buyers for the dwellings of the proposed project may already reside in Palm Desert and would move up from rental housing and apartments and a somewhat less strong growth inducing impact may be felt by the community. -67 3. The extension of utilities and improved streets will enhance the earlier probability of the de- velopment of the remaining unused land areas nearby. In particular, the land areas not now developed which abut and adjoin the East side of Deep Canyon Drive are susceptible to earlier de- velopment by reason of the improved access and extended utilities. -68- List of Exhibits PAGE No. 1. Regional Map indicating location 2 2. Tentative Map 8237 3 3. U.S.G.S. Topographical Map 4 4. Map of the City of Palm Desert 5 5. City Map of Residential Neighborhoods 6 Data Sources Coachella Valley County Water District Mr. Lowell Weeks, General Manager-Chief Engineer Desert Sands Unified School District Dr. Harold Schoenfeld, District Superintendent Southern California Edison Company Mr. McFadden, District Manager Southern California Gas Company Mr. Robert Herd, District Manager General Telephone Company Mr. Ralph Dutro, District Manager Coachella Valley Television Company Mr. Joe Benes, Manager Pacific Rim Environmental Consultants Mr. Don Shayler Bibliography Palm Desert General Plan, January 20, 1975 EIR, City of Palm Desert, Sign Ordnance, April 8 , 1976 EIR, General Plan Implementation Tools, August, 1975 Environmental Quality Act of 1970, State of California Rand McNally Industrial Index and Commercial Atlas, 1976 S RESOLUTIONINO. 76-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PARK VIEW SUBDIVISION PROJECT AS COM- PLETE. CASE NO. TT 8237 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, has held a duly noticed Public Hearing on October 14, 1976, on the Final Environmental Impact Report on a single-family residential subdivision submitted by U. S. LIFE SAVINGS I AND LOAN ASSOCIATION and located on a 54-acre site east of Portola Avenue, west of Deep Canyon Road, extended, and south If the Whitewater River Storm Channel , more particularly described as: A. portion of the Southwest 1/4, Section 16 T.5S, R.6L, SBB & M WHEREAS, said Environmental Impact Report does conform to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the Palm Desert Resolution Number 74-14, on Environmental Quality Procedure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the.City of Palm Desert as follows: That it does hereby certify as (complete that certain Final Environmental Impact Report attached hereto as Exhiblit "A", and incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth at length, together with all comments received from other agencies, organizations, and communitl groups thereon, and the responses to such comments prepared by the City staff, as the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report for the Park View Subdivision project. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED a t- a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council , held on the 14th day of October, 1976, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: McPherson, Mullins, Newbrander, Seidler & Brush NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: NOE7 BRASH, MAYOR SHEILA R. GIL I N, ACTIN CITY CLERK CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA F EIR FORM #5 To: State of California The Resources Agency Secretary for Resources 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Sacramento, California 95814 From: City of Palm Desert NOTICE OF COMPLETION Responsible Agency City of Palm Desert Division Dept. of Environmental Services Project Title TRACT 8237 - Parkview Subdivision Address -P. 0. Box 1977 City Palm Desert County Riverside Zip 92260 Contact Person Sam Freed Area Code 714 Phone 346-0611 Ext. 52 PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND BENEFICIARIES: EIR prepared on'.the tentative map for a 185-unit single-family detached, ' residential subdivision requested by U. S. Life Savings and Loan for a 54-acre site generally located east of Desert Star, west of Deep Canyon Road and south of the Whitewater River Storm Channel . Project will establish road pattern , subdivision layout, and general re- quirements for public improvements related to the new residential develop- ment. Project Location City Palm Desert Project Location County Riverside Time Period Provided for Review July 26,. 1976 August 26, 1976 Address Where Copy of Draft E. I. R. is Available Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, CA. 92260 Palm Desert Branch Library, 45-480 Portola Avenue, Palm Desert, CA. 92260 cc: File -1- NOTICE OF ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALM DESERT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RE: EIR for TRACT 8237 ACTION: XX Approved Denied Continued • Other REMARKS: Roll Call resulted as follows: Ayes: McPherson, Mullins, Newbrander, Seidler, Brush Noes: None Absent: None I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an order made and entered Page of City Council Minutes Deputy Clerk of the City Council in and for the City of Palm Desert, State of California 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 Date: September 27, 1976 LEGAL NOTICE CITY of PALM DESERT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 54 ACRES INTO 182 LOTS, LOCATED IN THE R-1-9,000 ZONE DISTRICT. CASE NO. TT 8237 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider an Environmental Impact Report for a Subdivision of 54 acres into 182 single-family lots in the R-1-9,000 Zone District, located south of Magnesia Falls Drive, extended, and west of beep Canyon Road, extended. WAIMUNITY PARK • c Su{ooL . DE]ERT STAR RO� 'E06 ' x?x// SAID Public Hearing will be held on October 14, 1976, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all in- terested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN ACTING CITY CLERK PUBLISH: PALM DESERT POST September 30, 1976. � I PROOF OF PUBLIL,A`TION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp r (2015.5 C.C.P.) I I STATE OF CALIFORNIA1 r County of Riverside ( ss' I I I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above Proof of Publication of entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- lation, published weekly, in Palm Desert, County of !Le-gal___Dloiog_ Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, -------------`--------------------------------------------------------------- under date of October 5, 1964, Case Number 83658; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of ----------------------------=------------------------------------- said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on Paste clipping the following dates to-wit: of Notice,SECURELY In This Space LEGAL NOTICE AN ENVIRONMENTAL OF CT REPORT FOR A SUBDIVI. SION OF 54 ACRES INTO 182 LOTS,LOCATED IN THE R- 9/3 0 1-9,000 ZONE DISTRICT. ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No.TT Notice Is hereby givens that a Public Hearing will be held be- fore the Palm Desert City Council to consider an Environmental • Impact Reu,I fora Subdivision of 54 acres Into 182 single-family Io in the k 1-9,000 Zone District,located south of Magnesia Falls Drive,extended,and west of Deep Canyon Road,extended. I certify (or declare) under penalty or perjury that the {A,` COuuuuny .{� 6^ foregoing is true and correct. . i sour nu pV�l�• Ignatur Said Public Hearing will'be held on October 14,1976. at 7:00 Date----- 9/3 0------------—------------__ 197---6 pm.in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall,45-275 Priddv Pear Lane, Palm Desert,California,at wh ch time and at Palm Desert, California place,all interestedpersons are invited to attend and beheard. Dated:September 27,1976 SHEILA R.GILLIGAN S ACTING CITY CLERK` POP-9/30t1 a PROOF OF PUBLICATION ; i October 4, 1976 CITY of PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Report On: Final Environmental Impact Report Applicant: U. %S. LIFE SAVINGS &LOAN ASSOCIATION Case No. : TRACT 8237 I. REQUEST: That the City Council certify as complete the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed tentative map, Case No. Tract 8237, to create a residential subdivision on a 54-acre parcel located east of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater River Storm Channel , and west of Deep Canyon Road, ex- tended. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 76- 129, certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report on Tract No. 8237 as complete. Justification is based upon: 1. Conformance of the final EIR to all requirements of the California En- vironmental Quality Act and the Palm Desert Resolution establishing procedures for the implementation of CEQA. 2. That the final EIR adequately responds to all comments received regarding the proposed project. III. DISCUSSION: An environmental assessment form for the proposed residential subdivision was submitted by the applicant. Upon review of the assessment and the tentative layout of the project, the staff determined on July 7, 1976, that the project would have a significant impact on the environment and the residents of a large portion of Palm Desert. The major concerns of the staff were related to circulation, sensitivity to existing public facilities within the neigh- borhood, concern with regards to the traffic impacts, -the impact of the pro- ject on the existing neighborhood, and the impact on surface drainage in the area. The staff was also concerned with the applicant's proposal not to con- struct as a part of the project those portions of Deep Canyon Road and Magnesia Falls Drive, adjacent to the site and what this would do to circulation in the existing residential area. --r A draft EIR was submitted to the City and circulated to various agencies and organizations on July 26, 1976, including: 1. Riverside County Air Pollution Control District 2. Coachella Valley County Water District 3. Riverside County Planning Commission 4. Unites States Post Office. 5. Coachella Valley Television 6. Palm Desert Property Owners Association 7. Coachella Valley Soil Conservation District 8. Coachella Valley Association of Governments 9. College of the Desert 10. Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District 11. Riverside County Sheriff's Department 12. Riverside County Airport Directors 13. Palm Desert Branch Library 14. Southern California Gas Company 15. Desert Sands Unified School District -16. Palm Desert Disposal Services 17. Palm Desert Community Services District Staff Report EIR - Tract 8237 October 4, 1976 III. DISCUSSION (continued) 18. California Regional Water Quality. Control Board 19. Riverside County Health Department 20. City of Indian Wells 21. Southern California Edison Company 22. General Telephone Company 23. Living Desert Reserve 24. California Parks & Recreation-History Preservation Department 25. Riverside Museum Associates 26. Concerned Citizens of Palm Desert 27. City Staff - City .Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Director of Building and Safety, Director.of Environmental Services, Associate Planner, Assistant Planner, and City Fire Marshall The final EIR, which was certified by the Planning Commission contains:. 1. the draft EIR submitted by the applicant 2. the comments and recommendations received on the draft EIR 3. the list of persons, organizations, and agencies reviewing the draft EIR 4. the responses of the staff of the Department of Environmental Services to significant environmental points raised in the review and consulta- tion process. Comments were received from: 1. California Regional Water. Quality. Control Board 2. Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District 3. Riverside County Health Department 4. Southern California Gas Company 5. Southern California Edison Company 6. Southern California Air Pollution Control District California Regional Water Quality Control Board: Comment: We do not anticipate any adverse.water quality impacts since sewage will be conveyed to the community sewage system. Response: No response requested or required. Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District: Comment: Wind screenings as proposed for the. north boundary should be started at the beginning of the project. Vegetative ground cover such as barley stubble should be established by irrigation to protect each annual remaining undeveloped land portion that is exposed to wind. Response: The EIR addresses this issue on page 31. The major cause of dust will result from disturbance of the crust of the soil due to con= struction. Mitigation of this problem is the responsibility of the developer and is enforced by the City Building Inspector. Because of the powdery nature of the soil on the site, extensive and fre- quent waterings will be needed to reduce wind-carried soil . The City has adequate authority to require the developer to take what- ever measures may be needed to resolve this problem. Fortunately, proposed down-wind of much of the site .is not residentially developed. -2- Staff Report EIR - Tract 8237 October 4, 1976 I1I. ;DISCUSSION: (continued) Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District:(continued) Comment: Disposal of soil should be by removal downwind from the project area, or if disposal is within the project area, stock piles should be protected with vegetation or appropriate soil pali- tants. Response: No soil wi:ll be removed from the site. Top-soil will be pre- served for future landscaping use. Comment:_ Flood hazard evaluation might be considered. Response: Surface drainage is discussed on pages 10, 13, 14, 15, and 56. The project area .is protected from major floods by the White- water River Storm Channel . Riverside County Health Department: Comment: We recommend that .this report be accepted.,, Response: No response requested or required. Southern California Gas Company: Comment: Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without.any significant impact on the environment. As a public utility, we are under the jurisdiction of..the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulator agencies. Should the agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which ser- vice is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. Response: The developer will offer as an option an "energy package" which will reduce the energy needs of the residences in the tract. Southern California Edison Company: Comment: The electric loads of the project are within parameters of pro- jected load growth which Edison is planning to meet in the area. Response: No response requested or required. Southern California Air Pollution Control District: Comment: The subject EIR is deficient in that estimated air quality emissions associated with. use of the completed tract are not presented. On page 30 it is erroneously assumed that the increase in motor vehicle emissions is directly proportional to the increase in housing units. For EIR purposes, we recommend that motor vehicle emissions be esti- mated by using the vehicle miles travelled (VMf) due to use of vehicles garaged in the tract in conjunction with the appropriate emission factor to compute vehicular emissions. Emissions arising from vehicles and as a result of the generation of energy consumed by the tract may be estimated using the enclosed tables of emission factors, electric en- ergy, and natural gas consumption. -3- Staff Report EIR - Tract 8237 October 4, 1976 III. DISCUSSION: Southern California Air Pollution Control District: . (continued) Response: The following tables should be inserted .into the final EIR: 1977 Vehicle Emission .Factors in Grams per Mile CO NOx Total HC . SOx Particulate TYPE I 26.2 3. 1 2..4 0. 1 0.4 (auto + light duty under 6,000 lbs. ) TYPE II 24.7 0. 1 12.9 -0- 0.2 (motorcycles) TYPE III 92.2 9.3 9.9 0.3 0.8 (heavy duty gas powered) TYPE IV 18.4 25.2 2.5 2.4 1.4 (heavy duty diesel ) Average Trip Breakdown by Vehicle Type Type I (auto + light duty) 92% Type II (motorcycles) 1% Type III (heavy duty gas) 3% Type IV (heavy duty diesel 4% 100°° Projected Daily Vehicle Emissions (Kgs. ) on the Basis of 2.5 Vehicles/DU, 25VMT/Vehicle/Day, and 182 DU. } CO: NOx Total HC sox Particulate --� - - - TYPE I. 278.7 33.0 25.5 1. 1 4.3 TYPE II 4.0 -0- 1.5 -0- -0- TYPE III 32.0 3.2 3.4 0. 1 0.,3 TYPE IV 8.5 11.7 1.2 1. 1 0.6 323.2 47.9 31.6 2.3 5.2 -4- ,"�ww�f��i:i�� �� ��1��''� 'Vn.c ..:,Lam.re f yl l ) rr1t.'; �.l 'r Y 0 '.,ww�.•��r.�'3.E4�a f{Yj�� i �r 81.71.1 Highway 111 Indio,California 92201 AUG 2 3 197G Au ust: 20, 1976 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES g CITY OF. PALM DESERT. Mr. Stephen A. Fleshman City of Palm Springs 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Mr. Fleshman: We acknowledge receipt of the Environmental Impact Report for Parkview Subdivision that was addressed to Karl Kelsey, Presi- dent of the Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District for review and comment. We have had the EIR reviewed considering items within the realm of the CVRCD's responsibilities. These points of consideration and comments are as shown on the attached worksheets. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed project. Yours truly, YOY- ce Harcrow Corresponding Secretary I'• Coachella Valley Resource: Conservation CF-EVT-1 District 3/14/75 �. ENVIRONMENTAL, IMPACT STATEMENT REVIEW WORKSIN;ET � LYT Cal-3 % (Write NA ."Not Applicable", or RAC "Received t.;tachment Jo. 2 Adequate Consideration", as appropriate. Give brief narrative description of exceptions) Points of Consideration Comment 1. Suitability or limitation of ���� Gr soils for proposed action. .t/�.,d St=!"�•G-'r71r� ds jJ'ry �L!c�c�. `r,r- �/e �or'f6 2. Provision for erosion control r -S10;,/d and water management durin / ..�. ..�• construction. g g ProJ G/,r {lzci2/a�i✓.Q ghoc,„�{ Co Ile r Svc as hdr/e a/E; 54,1d Gam. e,/Taf,/iS�ed b ir-r/ 0 r prr-/e cfi edc% I-e�narh� n e v�dc:tlela f-� oyrd �o,•�r rOt7 3. Provisions for conservation `ts e/<1PO.6,VJ treatment on project lands, 1 rights of way, access. 4. Effects of water discharge from project lands; water R�G quality. 5. Effects of disruption of /� natural drainage.patterns. A 6. Impact 'on existing conser- vation systems; provision. �/n for protecting existing 1(11 systems. 7. Amount of prime land or 5V /fie,$ . Prime— 1.a.jo /1/0f raHn,_4 significant water resource " '/ being lost to project. "VeY' ` 8. Impacts of severance; pro- vision for access corridors. ��G Y Points of Consideration Comments 9. Impact on Wetlands; pro- vision for reducing ad- NA verse effects. 10. Provision for stockpiling, 41 nP l S P �, �, , or conserving, or properly lxI reilvv'4 cL,,n W'i�c� {rOm P J c dr eb� disposing of topsoil. jF diSFJt�a /S `ti'�r ' 't1r� jar Jl�c dre.' ,, in6 1/r /'s e' 11. Pollution impacts and,pro- �7 vision for minimizing ad- I1 A Cl verse effects. 12. Other related resources evaluated as to effectA C of proposed action. 13. Effect on SCS or other agency projects. Projects not recognized in EIS.' r'lood /�aJd eVmlvdfior► 14. Consideration and pro- . y vision for floodplain L`on5, effects. 15. Impact on .historical or n archelogical resources. \ A li * Federal Register, June 3, 1974, Volume 39, Number 107, Parf III Additional Comments , '1 •1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUN D O. BROWN JR. Governor CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD— COLORADO RIVER BASIN REGION 2 73-271 Highway 111, Suite 21 Palm Desert CA 92260 Phone: ('710 346-7491 August 9,. 1976 Department of Environmental Services P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92260 . . We have reviewed the draft Environmental Impact Report and Tentative Map .for Parkview Subdivision. We do not anticipate any adverse water quality impacts resulting from the proposed project since sewage will be conveyed to the community sewerage system. "i JERROLD A. BRUNS Environmental Specialist JAB/ajj I . [\UG 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITf of PALM DESERT 9 r � r 1 . TO: Director of Environmental Services l City of Palm Desert FROM: Lloyd W. Rogers, R.S., Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County Health Department — Desert District DATE: August 18, 1976 The Department of Public Health of Riverside County has reviewed the Environmental Impact Report for Tract'08237. We recommend that this report be accepted. We have no further comments at this time. r• i SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COIV4PANV I R.W. RIDDELL 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA Eastern Division - Distribution Planning Supervisor Melling Address P. O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92rM August 3, 1976. Location of idearest Gas Pain: Desert Star, Erin and Primrose Dr. at Tract Line Department of Environmental Services P.O. Bax 1977 ` Palm Desert, California 92260 AUG. 5 16 v ' ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Re: Tr 8237 Cln QF PALM D ERi This letter is not to be interpreted as a -contractual commitment to serve tile proposed projects but only as an information serN)ice. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to Pile project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service wou- be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rulesian file with i the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. i The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the °urisdiction of the Cal.irornia Public Utilities Commissions We can elso be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies) S1,oru1d these agencies take any action which affects gas supply orlthe condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in' accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upgn request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you 8esire furt;ier information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact this office for assistance. • I i I � I ' I i . I { f I i l I � 1 , I Southern California Edison Company 36-100 Cathedral Canyon Drive Cathedral City, California 92234 46. 10 - 1 —' To: L il; o 7` /Io&Li z Subject: CeLsn A16 %mcf 8Z37 Environmental Impact Report Gentlemen: This is to advise that the subject property is located within. the service terri- tory of the Southern California Edison Company and that the electric loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth which Edison is plann- ing to meet in this area. Unless the demand for electrical generating capacity exceeds our estimates , and provided that there are no unexpected outages to major sources of electrical supply, we expect to meet our electrical load requirements during 1976-1978. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; and, if our plans to proceed with future construction of new generating facilities con- tinue to be delayed, our ability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods could -become marginal by 1979. In addition, the major fuel used in Edison's generating facilities is low sulfur fuel oil. Because of the extraordinary availability of alternate sources of energy, in addition to our customer's conservation efforts, we now believe that our low sulfur fuel oil inventory, together with our contractual commitments for delivery, will permit us to meet the forecasted demand for electricity during 1976. It is our intention to continue to do everything that can reasonably be accomplish- ed to provide our customers with a continuous and sufficient supply of electricity. Very truly yours, PUG 2 6197 S ENVIRONMENTAI SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT . I • I • i 1 , S� y; RECEIVED 7197E ENVIR@NMEPItAI. SERVICES' Southern California CITY OF PALM DESERT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS 9420 TELSTAR AVENUE. EL MONTE. CALIFORNIA 91731 2131 443.3931 August 20, 1976 File No. A60809R Mr. Stephen A. Fleshman Acting Director of Environmental. Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Mr. Fleshman: Draft EIR for Residential Subdivision, Tract 8237 We have reviewed the subject EIR and have the follow- ing comments to offer. The existing air quality in the vicinity of the project has not been included but has been incorporated by referencing the Palm Desert General Plan EIR. For us to properly evaluate the adequacy of this data we must review the referenced EIR. We would appreciate receiving a copy of the General Plan EIR for our use in reviewing the subject EIR and any subsequent EIR 's from your agency. The subject EIR is deficient in that estimated air quality emissions associated .will use of the completed tract are not presented. On page 30 it is erroneously assumed that the increase in motor vehicle emissions is directly proportional to the increase in housing units. For EIR purposes we recommend that motor vehicle emissions be estimated by using the vehicle miles travelled (VISIT) due to use of vehicles garaged in the tract in conjunction with the appropriate emission ' Mr. Fleshman -2- August 20, 1976 factor to compute vehicular emissions. Emissions arising from vehicles and as a result of the genera- tion of energy consumed by the tract may be estimated using the enclosed tables of emission factors, electric energy and natural gas consumption. If you have any questions please call me at (213) 443- 3931 , Ext.238 or John Gins at Ext.240. Very truly yours, J. A. Stuart Chief Air Pollution Control Officer Alan K. Stazer Senior Air Pollution Analyst Head, Impact Analysis Section AKS:jc August 26, .1976 CITY of PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Final Environmental Impact Report Applicant: U. S. LIFE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION Case No. : TRACT 8237 I. REQUEST: That the Planning Commission certify as complete the final environmental impact report (EIR) for the proposed tentative map, Case No. Tract 8237, to create a residential subdivision of 185 lots on a 54-acre parcel lo- cated east of Portola Avenue, south of the Whi.tewater Storm Channel , and west of Deep Canyon Road. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 171 . ,recommending to the City Council that the final environmental impact report on Tract No. 8237 be certified as complete. Justification is based upon: 1. Conformance of the final EIR to all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Palm Desert Resolution establishing procedures for the implementation of CEQA. 2. That the final EIR adequately responds to all comments received regarding the proposed project. III. .DISCUSSION: An environmental assessment form .for the proposed residential subdivision was submitted by the applicant. Upon review of the assessment and the tentative layout of the project, the staff determined on July 7, 1976, that the project would have a significant impact on the environment and the residents of a large portion of Palm Desert. The major concerns of the staff were related to circulation, sensitivity to existing public facilities within the neighbor- hood, concern with regards to the traffic impacts, the impact of the project on the existing neighborhood, and the impact on surface drainage in the area. The staff was also concerned with the applicant's proposal not to construct as a part of the project those portions of Deep Canyon Road and Magnesia Falls Drive adjacent to the site and-what this would do to circulation in the existing residential area. A draft EIR was submitted to the City and circulated to various agencies and or- ganizations on July 26, 1976, including: 1. Riverside County Air Pollution Control District 2. Coachella Valley County Water District 3. Riverside County Planning Commission 4. United States Post Office 5. Coachella Valley Television 6. Palm Desert Property Owners Association 7. Coachella Valley Soil Conservation District 8. Coachella Valley Association of Governments 9. College of the Desert 10.. Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District 11. Riverside County Sheriff's Department 12. Riverside County Airport Directors 13. Palm Desert Branch Library 14. Southern California Gas Company 15. Desert Sands Unified School District 16. Palm Desert Disposal Services 17. Palm Desert Community Services District �' ' ,- -- Staff Report EIR - Tract 8237 August 26, 1976 III .. DISCUSSION: (continued) 18. California Regional Water :Quality Control Board 19. Riverside County Health Department 20. City of Indian Wells 21. Southern California Edison Company 22. General Telephone Company 23. Living Desert Reserve 24. California Parks & Recreation-History Preservation. Department 25. Riverside Museum Associates 26. Concerned Citizens of Palm Desert 27. City Staff - City Manager, City Attorney., City `:Engineer;�Director of Building and Safety, .Director of Environmental Services, Associate Planner, Assistant Planner, and City Fire Marshall The final EIR, which is certified by the Planning Commission and City Council , contains: 1. the draft EIR submitted by the applicant 2. the comments and recommendations received on the draft EIR 3. the list of persons, organizations, and agencies reviewing the draft EIR 4. the responses of.the staff of the Department.of Environmental Services to significant environmental points raised in the review and consulta- tion process. Comments were received from: 1. California Regional Quality Control Board 2. Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District 3. Riverside County Health Department I 4. Southern California Gas Company 5. Southern California Edison Company California Regional Water Quality Control Board Comment: We do not anticipate any adverse water quality impacts since sewage L) will be conveyed to the community sewage system. , Response: - No response requested or required. Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District Comment: Wind screenings as proposed for the north boundary should be started at the beginning of the project. Vegetative ground cover such as barley stubble should be established by irrigation to_protect .each annual remaining undeveloped land portion.tha xposed Response: The EIR addresses this issue on page 31. The major cause of dust will result from disturbance of the crust of the soil due to con- struction. Mitigation of this problem is the responsibility of the developer and is enforced by the City Building Inspector. Because of the powdery nature of the soil on the site, extensive and fre- quent waterings will be needed to reduce wind-carried soil . The City has adequate authority to require the developer to take what- ever measures maybe needed to resolve this problem. Fortunately, property down-wind of much of the site is not residentially developed. -2- Staff Report EIR - Tract 8237 August 26, 1976 III . DISCUSSION: ^` f Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District . (continued) 'Comment: Disposal of soil should be by removal downwind from the project area, or if disposal is within the project area, stock piles should be protected with vegetation or appropriate soil pali- tants. Response: No soil will be removed from the site. Top-soil will be pre- served for future landscaping use. Comment: Flood hazard evaluation might be considered. Response: Surface drainage is discussed on pages 10, 13, 14, 15, and 56. .The project area is protected from major floods by the White- water River Storm Channel . Riverside County Health Department Comment.: We recommend .that this report .be accepted. .Response: No response requested or required. Southern .Cal-ifornia Gas Company Comment: Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment As a public utility, we are under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulator agencies. Should the agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which ser- vice is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. Response: . The developer will offer .as an option an "energy package" which will reduce the energy needs of the residences in the tract. Southern. Cal.ifornia Edison Company Comment: The electric loads of the project are within parameters of pro- jected load growth which Edison is planning to meet in the area. . , Response: No response requested or required. -3- l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 171 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL AND CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PARK VIEW SUBDIVISION PROJECT. CASE NO. TT 8237 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has held a duly noticed Public Hearing on August 31, 1976, on the final environmental impact report on a 185-unit residential subdivision submitted by U.S. LIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION and located on a 54-acre site east of Portola Avenue, west of Deep Canyon and south of the Whitewater River Storm Channel , more particularly described as - A portion of the Southwest 1/4, Section 16 T5S, R6E, SBB & M WHEREAS, said environmental impact report does conform to the pro- visions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the Palm Desert Resolution No. 74-14 on Environmental Quality Procedure. NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows: That it does hereby recommend to the City Council of Palm Desert that it certify as complete that certain draft environmental impact report attached hereto as Exhibit "A" , and incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth at length, together with all comments received from other agencies, or- ganizations, and community groups thereon, and the responses to such comments prepared by the City staff, as the certified final environmental impact report for the Park View Subdivision project. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission held on the 31st day of August, 1976, by the following vote, to with: ! AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, MILLS, VAN DE MARK, WILSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE S.�ROY WILSON', CHAIRMAN ATTEST: XX PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY Coachella Resource Consem-Jon RIVERSIDE COUNTY DISTRIO Of 81-711 Highway 111 - Indio,California 92201 AUG G. j SJ�1J August 20 1976 EN CITY of PALM DESERTS ' Mr. Stephen A. Fleshman City of Palm Springs 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Mr. Fleshman: We acknowledge receipt of the Environmental Impact Report for Parkview Subdivision that was addressed to Karl Kelsey, Presi- dent of the Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District for review and comment. We have had the EIR reviewed considering items within the realm of the CVRCD's responsibilities. These points of consideration and comments are as shown on the attached worksheets. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed project. Yours truly, FOYe Harcrow Corresponding Secretary 1 Coachella Valley Resource Conservation CF-EVT-1 District 3/14/75 :3 j ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT REVIEW WORKSHEEP (Write NA "Not Applicable", or RAC "Received tac.n:ent _o. 2 Adequate Consideration", as appropriate. Give brief narrative description of exceptions) Points of Consideration Comment �y �G; 1. Suitability or limitation of i,r no � ��,� �bnS soils for proposed action. � � SCr rrfs S cis p! ra�°c � A,r �/i e nor fly 2. Provision for erosion control oon&-ry SA.,& 7��1, s/dr7 a�1 �9ey�yliri cL and water management during >7e Pro eef, lel9- i.� �►^ov�d ©v�r 5vc�ds construction. ha.r/e sf0bb�e. s�cI/d Z�. esTa,6/o y4ed lrr/ dfi®vl �rva��C.7F" P.de� a N nvb� 1 pn► ,1791,4 44 aeVe/& ' evLcl Pt>r' t9yJ tid 3. Provisions for conservation treatment on project lands, [ rights of way, access. �� 6 4. Effects of water discharge from project lands; water quality. 5. Effects of disruption of /�a natural drainage patterns. AN 6. Impact on existing conser- vation systems; provision for protecting existing systems. II 7. Amount of prime land or ACSr�m� 1ari�� � �b-li1eC significant water resource 'JJ 1 being lost to project. r�/d�2r /bSS IVACi B. Impacts of severance; pro- vision for access corridors. /YA G s Points of Consideration Comments 9. Impact on Wetlands; pro- vision for reducing ad- NA verse effects. 10. Provision for stockpiling, 6PP&bbAe_' drsPo � �f $°�� S�I�u� conserving, or properly ) rihl3tJa� Gin �la.�d �rYim �dr'e�f oi^ disposing of topsoil. j� �rSp�sa� rs bvr ►` Pry �ttds f f ck hey tqr- ,p eurrT�j velefeT16 n r a'i✓ Ja fG .SDr t id14 — 11. Pollution impacts and pro- vision for minimizing ad- /, A C, verse effects. 12. Other related resources evaluated as to effect C of proposed action. 13. Effect on SCS or other agency projects. Projects A not recognized in EIS.' 14. Consideration and pro- 9y eft . vision for floodplain �lnSrd�► effects. 15. Impact on historical or A archelogical resources. rl * Federal Register, June 3, 1974, Volume 39, Ifumber 107, Parf III Additional Comments STATE OF CALIFORNIA—RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD- COLORADO RIVER BASIN REGION 73-271 Highway 111, Suite 21 Palm Desert CA 92260 Phone: (710 346-7491 August 9, 1976 Department of Envir�oramentali Services P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92260 . We have reviewed the draft Environmental Impact Report and Tentative Map .for Parkview Subdivision. We do not anticipate any .adverse water quality impacts resulting from the proposed project since sewage will be conveyed to the community sewerage system. JERROLD A. BRUNS Environmental Specialist JAB/a j j C . ENNfIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert FROM: Lloyd W. Rogers, R.S., Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County Health Department - Desert District DATE: August 18, 1976 The Department of Public Health of Riverside County has reviewed the Environmental Impact Report for Tract .#8237. We recommend that this report be accepted. We have no further comments at this time. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA gqS COMPANY R.W. RIDDELL 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Mailing Address P. 0. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 August 3, 1976 Location of idearest Gas Main: Desert Star, Erin and Primrose Dr._ at Tract Line ^i Department of Environmental Services C+ I D P.O. Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 AUGli/b ENVIRONb1ENTAL'' SERVICES' Re: Tr 8237 CITY 9F PALM DESERT This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas servir,e to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the .,urisdiction of the "al 'ifornia Public Utilities Commission. We can D iso be afferted by actions of federal re-lu'Iat0`"y agencies. Shc''''d these agencies take any lction which affects gas supply or the condition udder which service is available, gas. service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistan:.e in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire furt:ier information on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact this Office for assistance. d Southern California Edison Company SCE 36-100 Cathedral Canyon Drive Cathedral City, California 92234 46. 10 To: L zZ o /oQ LTiZ DesEr/- Subject: Ctt_sa /✓D: %rncZ ' 8Z37 Environmental Impact Report Gentlemen: This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service terri- tory of the Southern California Edison Company and that the electric loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth which Edison is plann- ing to meet in this area. Unless the demand for electrical generating capacity exceeds our estimates, and provided that there are no unexpected. outages to major sources of electrical supply, we expect to meet our electrical load requirements during 1976-1978. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; and, if our plans to proceed with future construction of new generating facilities con- tinue to be delayed, our ability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods could become marginal by 1979. In addition, , the major fuel used in Edison's generating facilities is low sulfur fuel oil. Because of the extraordinary availability of alternate sources of energy, in addition to our customer's conservation efforts, we now believe that our low sulfur fuel oil inventory, together with our contractual commitments for delivery, will permit us to meet the forecasted demand for electricity during 1976. It is our intention to continue to do everything that can reasonably be accomplish- ed to provide our customers with a continuous and sufficient supply of electricity. Very truly yours, R�D�`�� D � ' PUG 2 6 ��G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM pESER7 � r - 'S i�, �a ��.,s -,_ 45-275 PRICKLY PEA LANE, @'/�Lfd DESERT, C��LiFOEdf�lA9?26O — -•----.--_-- TELEPHONE (714} 346-06I@— - ----- REPORT OF PLANNING COM,�IISSION ACTION DATE September 2, 1976 APPLICANT U. S. Life Savings and Loan Association 5220 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA. 90036 Attn: Mr. Joseph T. Hall CASE, NO. EIR for Tract 8237 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken. the following action at its meeting of August 31, 1976 CONTINUED TO DENIED XXX APPROVED BY PLANNING COYIMISSION RESOLUTION No. 171 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE``CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING CONDIISSION DECISION. Tentatively PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 10-14-76 FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above actio):). may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services , City or Palm Desert, within fifteen (I5) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAIAS , Secretary Palm Desert Planning Coawmission Applicant � x � z� x � gxx Don Shayl er VqM Frank Goodman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 171 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL AND CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PARK VIEW SUBDIVISION PROJECT. CASE NO. TT 8237 f i WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has held a duly noticed Public Hearing on August 31, 1976, on the final environmental impact report on a 185-unit residential subdivision submitted by U.S. LIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION and located on. a 54-acre site east of Portola Avenue,-.west of Deep Canyon and south of the Whitewater River Storm Channel , more particularly described as: A portion of the Southwest 1/4, Section 16 175S, R6E, SBB & M WHEREAS, said environmental impact report does conform to the pro- visions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and the Palm Desert (" Resolution No. 74-14 on Environmental Quality Procedure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT .RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows: That it does hereby recommend to the City Council of Palm Desert that it certify as complete that certain draft environmental impact report attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth at length, together with all comments received from other agencies, or- ganizations, and community groups thereon, and the responses to such comments prepared by the City staff, as the certified final environmental impact report . . .for the Park View Subdivision project. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission held on the 31st day of August, 1976, by the following "i vote, to with: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, MILLS, VAN DE MARK, WILSON 1 NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE S. ROY WILSON, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY MW 1 August 26, .1976 CITY of PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Final Environmental Impact Report Applicant: U. S. LIFE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION Case No. : TRACT 8237 I. REQUEST: That the Planning Commission certify as complete the final environmental impact report (EIR) for the proposed tentative map, Case No. Tract 8237, to create a residential subdivision of 185 lots on a 54-acre parcel lo- cated east of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater Storm Channel , and west of Deep Canyon Road. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 171 recommending to the City Council that the final environmental impact report on Tract No. 8237 be certified as complete. Justification is based upon: 1. Conformance of the final EIR to all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Palm Desert Resolution establishing procedures for the implementation of CEQA. 2. That the final EIR adequately responds to all comments received regarding the proposed project. III. .DISCUSSION: An environmental assessment form for the proposed residential subdivision was submitted by the applicant. Upon review of the assessment and the tentative layout of the project, the staff determined on July 7, 1976, that the project would have a significant impact on the environment and the residents of a large portion of Palm Desert. The major concerns of the staff were related to circulation, sensitivity to existing public facilities within the neighbor- hood, concern with regards to the traffic impacts, the impact of the project on the existing neighborhood, and the impact on surface drainage in the area. The staff was also concerned with the applicant's proposal not to construct as a part of the project those portions of Deep Canyon Road and Magnesia Falls Drive adjacent to the site and what this would do to .circulation in the existing residential area. A draft EIR was submitted to the City and circulated to various agencies and or- ganizations on July 26, 1976, including: 1. Riverside County Air Pollution Control District 2. Coachella Valley County Water District 3. Riverside County Planning Commission 4. United States Post Office 5. Coachella Valley Television 6. Palm Desert Property Owners Association 7. Coachella Valley Soil Conservation District 8. Coachella Valley Association of Governments 9. College of the Desert 10. Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District 11. Riverside County Sheriff's Department 12. Riverside County Airport Directors 13. Palm Desert Branch Library 14. Southern California Gas Company 15. Desert Sands Unified School District 16. Palm Desert Disposal Services 17. Palm Desert Community Services District Staff Report EIR - Tract 8237 August 26, 1976 III . DISCUSSION: (continued) 18. California Regional Water Quality Control Board 19. Riverside County Health Department 20. City of Indian Wells 21. Southern California Edison Company 22. General Telephone Company 23. Living Desert Reserve 24. California Parks & Recreation-History Preservation Department 25. Riverside Museum Associates 26. Concerned Citizens of Palm Desert 27. City Staff - City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer, Director of Building and Safety, Director of Environmental Services, Associate Planner, Assistant Planner, and City Fire Marshall The final EIR, which is certified by the Planning Commission and City Council , contains: 1. the draft EIR submitted by the applicant 2. the comments and recommendations received on the draft EIR 3. the list of persons, organizations, and agencies reviewing the draft EIR 4. the responses of.the staff of the Department .of Environmental Services to significant environmental points raised in the review and consulta- tion process. Comments were received from: 1. California Regional Quality Control Board 2. Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District i 3. Riverside County Health Department 4. Southern California Gas Company 5. Southern California Edison Company California Regional Water Quality Control Board Comment: We do not anticipate any adverse water quality impacts since sewage will be conveyed to the community sewage system. Response: . No response requested or required. Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District "Comment: Wind screenings as proposed for the north boundary should be started at the beginning of the project. Vegetative ground cover such as barley stubble should be established by irrigation to protect each annual remaining undeveloped land portion that is exposed to wind. Response: The EIR addresses this issue on page 31. The major cause of dust will result from disturbance of the crust of the soil due to con- struction. Mitigation of this problem is the responsibility of the developer and is enforced by the City Building Inspector. Because of the powdery nature of the soil on the site, extensive and fre- quent waterings will be needed to reduce wind-carried soil . The City has adequate authority to require the developer to take what- ever measures may be needed to resolve this problem. Fortunately, property down-wind of much of the site is not residentially .developed. -2- Staff Report EIR - Tract 8237 August 26, 1976 III. DISCUSSION: Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District (continued) Comment: Disposal of soil should be by removal downwind from the project area, or if disposal is within the project area, stock piles should be protected with vegetation or appropriate soil pali- tants. Response: No soil will be removed from the site. Top-soil will be pre- served for future landscaping use. Comment: Flood hazard evaluation might be considered. Response: Surface drainage is discussed on 'pages 10, 13, 14, 15, and 56. The project area is protected .from major floods by the White- water River Storm Channel . Riverside County Health Department Comment: We recommend that this report be accepted. .Response: No response requested or required. Southern California Gas Company Comment: Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. As a public utility, we are under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also, be affected by actions of federal regulator agencies. Should the agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which ser- vice is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. Response: The developer will offer as an option an "energy package" which will reduce the energy needs of the residences in the tract. Southern California Edison Company Comment: The electric loads of the project are within parameters of pro- jected load growth which Edison .is planning to meet in the area. Response: No response requested or required. -3- • may,`,};C�.��f 4�'� ��•" Y � ���f ® ��*' Y �• B..,, ® r ,�, a= 1 d 81.711 Highway 111 Indio,California 92201 AUG 2 3 19 G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES August 20, 1976 CITY OF. PALM DESERT' Mr. Stephen A. Fleshman City of Palm Springs 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Mr. Fleshman: We acknowledge receipt of the Environmental Impact Report for Parkview Subdivision that was addressed to Karl Kelsey, Presi- dent of the Coachella Valley Resource Conservation District for review and comment. We have had the EIR reviewed considering items within the realm of the CVRCD's responsibilities. These points of consideration and comments are as shown on the attached worksheets. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this proposed project. Yours truly,/ yoy-ce Harcrow Corresponding Secretary CF-EVT-1 Coachella Valley Resource Conservation 3/l�+/75 District ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT REVIEW WORKSIEEET LWT Cal-3 (1:ay. i) (Write NA ."Not Applicable", or RAC "Received t;tac:n,:ent Jo. 2 Adequate Consideration", as appropriate. Give brief narrative description of exceptions) Points of Consideration Comment 1. Suitability or limitation of ��f Or no n's soils for proposed action. �1,h� sc,�rt'rrfn�5 0s Iry a i.d Fr r 7"/e 2. Provision for erosion control �dvnl�:ir� SI / 46ZOO afmr-, &�i�han and water management duringr��, construction. P -� CoI/er Svcla 3s fiar�e `l� s%.1�/d Irt^! dfi'a7 �r�/t'G Pdc�j SYr»vh� hl • r�n�a»a+h e r�td.Lv'Llb� ah� �Ur" iAvj i� 3. Provisions for conservation `t5 =1Cf�oSc� treatment on project lands, �. rights of way, access. �� C 4. Effects of water discharge from project lands; water �AG quality. i i I 5• Effects of disruption of �/^ - natural drainage patterns. /V4 ° 6. Impact 'on existing conser- vation systems; provision / for protecting existing 4 systems. i 7• Amount of prime land or significant water resource being lost to project. ') 8. Impacts of severance; pro- vision for access corridors. /YA G y . 1F� Points of Consideration Comments 9. Impact on wetlands; pro- vision for reducing ad- 41A verse effects. 10. Provision for stockpiling, 'T 6ppkb/N/-/ dIgP� _ conserving, or properly /x� )"eh v��1 lc(,vn WiAJ {ro�� PrnJ dr�� E'r disposing of topsoil. �� ��ib'pE'Sa! �•5 •-die- P'-0 c 6r--N / cK ; ec, S40"8 h� �m�ecf� wr�j )/i�lefolfc�; 11. Pollution impacts and,pro- �p vision for minimizing ad- verse effects. 12. Other related resources evaluated as to effectNA G of proposed action. 13. Effect on SCS or other agency projects. Projects 11A not recognized in EIS.' 14. Consideration and pro- f�ooc� frajbrd �vm�v�f«�ti� ��r�jlf Gam, vision for floodplain 6on6,cier'A' • effects. 15. Impact on historical or �p archelogical resources. /i q C * Federal Register, June 3, 1974, Volume 39, Number 107, Parf III Additional Comments • 1 i i 1 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. GROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD-- COLORADO RIVER BASIN REGION 73-271 Highway ill, Suite 21 Palm Desert CA 92260 Phone: ('710 346-7491 August 9, 1976 Department of Environmental Services I P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92260 We have reviewed the draft Environmental Impact Report and Tentative Map for Parkview Subdivision. We do not anticipate any adverse 'water quality impacts resulting from the proposed project since sewage will be conveyed to the community sewerage system. JERROLD A. BRUNS Environmental Specialist JAB/ajj RVICE S El CITY OF PALM DESERT i. . ' 1 I i ! 1 t TO: Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert FROM: Lloyd W. Rogers, R.S. , Supervising Sanitarian Riverside County Health. Department - Desert District DATE: August 18, 1976 The Department of Public Health of Riverside County has reviewed the Environmental Impact Report for Tract #8237. We recommend that this report be accepted. We have no further comments at this time. f 8 k SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA S COKAPANY R.W. RIDDELL 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor Melling Address P. O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 August 3, 1976 Location of Nearest Gas Pain: Desert Star, Erin and Primrose Dr. at Tract Line Department of Environmental Services P.O. Bux 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 AUG 5 ENVIRONMeiyTAL SERVICES C'Ty, QF, eALM DESERT Re: Tr 8237 This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas starvire to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension, rules on file .pith � the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. € t The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based !upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the urisdictiGn of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can �1c0 be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Si,C':�'i these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition i udder which service is available, gas service .rill be provided in' accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon rtcquest, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information, on any of our energy conservation programs , please contact- E this office for assistance. • i egg.. y P i i t t j� J 1 i Southern California Edison Company 36-100 Cathedral Canyon Drive Cathedral City, California 92234 46. 10 TO: CLL� o l'-,O&Linz DesEr2� Subject: /t/D_ 7Tkzc2� 8Z37 Environmental Impact Report Gentlemen: This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service terri- tory of the Southern California Edison Company and that the electric loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth which Edison is plann- ing to meet in this area. Unless the demand for electrical generating capacity exceeds our estimates, and provided that there are no unexpected outages to major sources of electrical supply, we expect to meet our electrical load requirements during 1976-1978. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; and, if our plans to proceed with future construction of new generating facilities con- tinue to be delayed, our ability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods could become marginal by 1979. In addition, the major fuel used in Edison's generating facilities is low sulfur fuel oil. Because of the extraordinary availability of alternate sources of energy, in addition to our customer's conservation efforts, we now believe that our low sulfur fuel oil inventory, together with our contractual commitments for delivery, will permit us to meet the forecasted demand for electricity during 1976. It is our intention to continue to do everything that can reasonably be accomplish- ed to provide our customers with a continuous and sufficient supply of electricity. Very truly yours, P AUG261�1 ENVIRDNMENTA4 SERVICES , CIN of VIAL DESERT i f�f i � 7 y ,I f s, 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 August 30, 1976 Alan K. Stazer Senior Air Pollution Analyst Head, Impact Analysis Section Southern California Air Pollution Control District 9420 Telstar Avenue E1 Monte, California 91731 Dear Mr. Stazer: In response to your letter commenting on the draft EIR for Tract 8237 (your file number A60809R) , I have enclosed a copy of the Palm Desert General .P.lan and EIR for your review. Please address future responses on Palm Desert projects to: Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 Thank you once again for all the cooperation and assistance you have provided. ery truly yours, PAUL A. WILLIAMS Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert, California PAW/mj Enclosure (as noted) i G I f INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM. City of Palm Desert TO: Paul A. Williams FROM: Sam Freed SUBJECT: Late Response on EIR for Tract 8237 DATE: August 30, 1976 A late comment concerning the EIR for Tract 8237 was received on Friday, August 27th, too late to go ..into the staff report. The following tables should be inserted into the final EIR: 1977 Vehicle Emission Factors. in Grams per Mile co N0x_. totalHC Sox Particulate TYPE I 26.2 3.1 2.4 0.1 0.4 (auto :,light duty under 6,000 lbs. ) TYPE II 24.7 0. 1 12.9 -0- 0.2 (motorcycles) TYPE III 92.2 9.3 9.9 0.3 0.8 (heavy duty gas powered) TYPE IV 18.4 25.2 2.5 2.4 1.4 (heavy duty diesel ) Average Trip Breakdown by.Vehicle Type Type I (auto + light duty) 92% Type II (motorcycles) 1% Type III (heavy duty gas) 3% Type IV (heavy duty diesel ) 4% 10 0 Paul A. Williams Page Two August 30, 1976 Projected Daily Vehicle Emissions, (Kgs. ) on the Basis of 2.5 Vehicles/DU, 25 VMT/Vehicle/Day, and 185 DU. c0 NOx HC sox P TYPE I 278.7 33.0 25.5 1.1 4.3 TYPE II 4.0 -0- 1.5 -0- -0- TYPE III 32.0 3.2 3.4 0.1 0.3 TYPE IV 8.5 11.7 1..2 1:1 0.6 323.2 47.9 31.6 2.3 5.2 i RECEIVED , 15/CY J / ENVIROPWNTAL SERVICES Southern California CITY of PALM DESERT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS 9420 TELSTAR AVENUE. EL MONTE. CALIFORNIA 91731 • 1 2131 443.3931 August 20, 1976 File No. A60809R Mr. Stephen A. Fleshman Acting Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Mr. Fleshman: Draft EIR for Residential Subdivision, Tract 8237 We have reviewed the subject EIR and have the follow- ing comments to offer. The existing air quality in the vicinity of the project has not been included but has been incorporated by referencing the Palm Desert General Plan EIR. For us to properly evaluate the adequacy of this data we must review the referenced EIR. We would appreciate receiving a copy of the General Plan EIR for our use in reviewing the subject EIR and any subsequent EIR' s from your agency. The subject EIR is deficient in that estimated air quality emissions associated wi3A use of the completed tract are not presented. On page 30 it is erroneously assumed that the increase in motor vehicle emissions is directly proportional to the increase in housing units. For EIR purposes we recommend that motor vehicle emissions be estimated by using the vehicle miles travelled (VTIT) due to use of vehicles garaged in the tract in conjunction with the appropriate emission Mr. Fleshman -2- August 20, 1976 factor to compute vehicular emissions. Emissions arising from vehicles and as a result of the genera- tion of energy consumed by the tract may be estimated using the enclosed tables of emission factors, electric energy and natural gas consumption. If you have any questions please call me at (213) 443- 3931 , Ext.238 or John Gins at Ext.240. Very truly yours, J. A. Stuart Chief Air Pollution Control Officer Alan K. Stazer Senior Air Pollution Analyst Head, Impact Analysis Section AKS: jc 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 Date: August 17;,, 1976 LEGAL NOTICE CITY of PALM DESERT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 54 ACRES INTO 185 LOTS, LOCATED IN THE R-1-9,000 ZONE DISTRICT. CASE NO. TT 8237 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider an Environmental Impact Report for a Subdivision of 54 acres into 185 single-family lots in.the R71-9,000-Zone .Dist.rict, located south of Magnesia Falls Drive, extended, and west of Deep Canyon, extended. CHA EL ew C'OA9MUNITY PARK :. DGE 'PO Y DESERT STAR 80,1 'E •�' 4 (' W RDA D SAID Public Hearing will be held on August 31, 1976, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45475 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested, persons are invited to attend and be heard._ s I PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLICH: Palm Desert Post-August 19, 1976 YOUR RECEIPT THAM'< YCLI S 366 411 ^r.00 7F S01 0366 7107176 7.Of' TL S 366 PF.000KTO 366 .000AC6 001 0366 01A 7/07/7E CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA r ^�7-W6ITO0659 TREASURER'S RECEIPT _ �'�LY DATE: AMOUNT: RECEIVED FROM: s 755l 0 55a.0L zF SDI 0759 7/2746 H 5'o7.UU T_ 5 -5 a 5J.U�GKtU DISAP6lUTR159 01 A 3 �"c'//76 W IN PAYMENT OF: ACCOUNT AMOUNT > <Y J t J Z F =.0 III j yl W �m 00 Q l! W 0 Z Z RECEIVED oY: TOTAL S �� 10.70 30Y _1 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 July 26, 1976 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Project: DRAFT EIR FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION Case No. : TRACT 8237 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Tentative Map. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City is interested in the .probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc.). Your recommendations should be returned to the Department of Environmental Services, P., 0. Box 1977, Palm Desert, CA. 92260, no later than August 26, 1976. Very truly y�s, K_� 'SiP�CN A. FLESHMAN Acting Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert, California Attachment (as noted) SAF/mj EIR FORM #2 CITY OF PALM DESERT NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The following are the projects evaluated by the Cityd Palm Desert during the last seven days and the resulting actions: Case No. Applicant Address of Project Action Taken No. E.I. R. will An E. I. R. be required on will be re- the grounds that quired in the project will that the not have a sig- project will nificant effect. have a sig- nificant effecl TRACT 5796 SILVER SPUR South of Portola Avenue X ASSOCIATES and east of Mariposa Drive. v TRACT 8237 FRANK GOODMAN Northeast of Desert Star - X Boulevard Any interested citizen may appeal this determination to the Planning Commission within eight (8) days of the date of the posting of public notice by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 74-14 with the Department of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within said time, this determination shall be final. Date Posted: July 12, 1976 Date to be Removed July ; Appeal period expires July 20, 1976 CC: Files j R� 11751t:a�z' off 51= 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 July 8, 1976 U. S. Life Savings & Loan 5220 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles; California 90036 Attention: Joseph T. Hall , Assistant Vice President Subject: Determination of Environmental Significance for Tract No. 8237 Dear Sir: On July 7th, I did review the Environmental Assessment on Case No. Tentative Tract 8237. After review of the possible impacts of this project and after consultation with other public agencies that would be affected by this project, I do hereby find that said project may have a significant impact on the environment because of the following conditions: 1. Said project seemed to have impacts which have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, curtail the range of uses of the environment, and to reduce the diversity in the environment. 2. A number of the impacts of the project, while individually limited, are cumulatively considerable. 3. The environmental effects of the project will cause sub- stantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. In layman 's terms, the project is considered to be environmentally significant from the standpoint of circulation, sensitivity to existing public facilities within the neighborhood, concern with regards to the traffic impacts, concerns with regards to the impact of the project on the existing neighborhood; and finally, with con- cerns regarding the impact of the project on drainage in the area. The matter of circulation and traffic is of particular concern since two of the major entryways to the project are not proposed to be con- structed as a part of the project. Those being the extension of Mag- nesia Falls Drive and the extension of Deep Canyon Road. In addition, U. S. Life Savings & Loan Page Two July 8, 1976 the relationship of the circulation to the existing subdivision has some concerns. Based upon this finding of significance under the provisions. of Section 25.41-5, you are required to prepare or cause to be prepared a draft Environmental Impact Report which complies with the provisions of Sec- tion 25.41-6 .inclusive. Said Impact Report shall be completed prior to submittal of the tentative tract. Since the City has completed Environmental Impact Reports both for the General Plan and the Zoning Map, a great amount of the material required to be submitted may be re- ferenced to these documents. An appeal of this decision may .be .made to the City -Council within eight (8) days of the receipt of this letter. If you have any questions re- garding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, ' PAUL A. WILLIAMS Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert, California cc: Don Shayler, Pacific Rim PAW/mj of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant, an EIR must be prepared. This provision does not apply to two or more separate _ projects where the impact of each is insignificant. - The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 25.41-4 Negative Declarations A Negative Declaration finding shall be determined by the Lead Agency for a project that is not categorically exempt, as prescribed within Article 25.41-2, ;;hen it has been determined from the Initial Study, as prescribed i-.! :hin Article >5.41.-3, that no significant effect on the c:nv-ironment is an-Licipat:ed. The Neg.—Live Decli�ration must in- Ciude a description, of the project as proposed, a description of the envi ronroent existing before co.12,encer:e it of' the project:, and detailed information supporting the contention that the project. t•!ill not have a significant effect on the environment. Before a Negative Declara- tion is prepared, consultation shall be made with all responsible agencies in order to insure that all those who will issue approvals _ on the project will have their concerns reflected in the Negative Declaration. 25.41-4.01 Procedures A Negative Declaration request for any project which does not meet the requirements of Article 25.41--2 shall be filed r:ith the Director of Environmental Services. The Director shall review the request and forward it with his recommendation to the Planning Commission after he or his staff has reviewed the request and he has also obtained comments from other public agencies having jurisdiction by law. The Commission shall make a recommendation for approval or denial to the City Council which shall make a final determination of approval or denial . The Negative Declaration, with a notification of action taken (approval or denial), must be filed with the County I_ Clerk of the County of Riverside at least thirty (30) days before the project is approved. If the project required discretionary approvals from a state agency, the Notice shall also be filed with the Secretary of Resources. 25.41-5 Environmental Impact Report Provisions If it is determined, after an initial study, that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, the initiating agency 1 for "public projects" and the applicant developer in cases of 1 �• "private activities" shall prepare or cause to be prepared by con- tract a Draft Environmental Impact Report. Before an EIR is -' 25.41 (5) f prepared, consultation shall be made with all responsible agencies to insure that their concerns will be reflected in the EIR. d 25.41-6 Contents of the Environmental Impact Report The EIR shall contain the following items: 3 25.41.-6.01 Description of the Project (1) The precise location and boundaries of the proposed pro- jest must be shown on a detailed map included in the EIR. Ji Reference must be made by name to which USGS Topographical (�a.p would cover the same location if a USGS map is not u used. The location of the project 'must also appear on a J regional map, %,.ith significant envirommniital areas and lr..ncirilarks indicates, in relation to the project area(s) . (2) A statement of the objectives sought by the proposed. project must be included. This can be as detailed as desire] by. the sponsor. (3) A generi;l description of the project's physical (technical and environmental ) characteristics, considering the principal engineering proposals, must be included. The description should not supply extensive detail beyond that needed for evaluation and review of environmental icupact. (4) Any applicable Army Corps of Engineer or other governmental agency public notice or permit number should be referenced with dates. 25.41-6.02 Environmental Setting An EIR must include a description of the environment as it exists J before commencement of the project, from both a local and a regional perspective. Knowledge of the regional setting is critical to the assessment of environmental impacts. Special emphasis should be ,I placed on environmental resources that are rare or unique to that region. Specific reference to related projects, both public and private, in the region should also be included, for purposes of examining the possible cumulative impact of such projects. 25.41-6.03 Environmental Impact All phases of a project must be considered when evaluating its impact on.the environment: acquisition, development and operation. 25.41 (6) - �s (1) The Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action: Describe the direct and indirect impacts of the project ion the environment, giving due consideration to both the ' short-term and long-term effects. It shall include specifics of the area, the resources ! � involved, physical changes, alterations to ecological systems and changes induced in population distribution, population concentration, the human use of the land (including commercial and residential development) and J other aspects of the resource base such as water, scenic -I quality and public services. Both qv,-Intitative and qualitative information should be included (e.g. , acres of habitat, numbers of ducks resting, and the scenic value of a waterfowl. habitat) , but quant'i ta.ti ve data should not he overemphi;s i zed at the expense of qualitative judgments. Qualitative judgments should be based on factual 'information. (2) Any Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided if the Proposal is Implemented: Describe any adverse impacts, including those which can be 1 reduced to an ".acceptable" level but not eliminated. Where there are impacts that cannot be alleviated without impos- ing an alternative design, their implications and the reasons why the project is being proposed, notwithstanding their effect, shall be described in detail . Do not neglect impacts on any aesthetically valuable surroundings, or on human health. (3) Mitigation Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact: - Describe avoidable adverse impacts, including inefficient and unnecessary consumption of energy, and the measures proposed to minimize these impacts. This discussion shall include an identification of the acceptable levels .to which such impacts will be reduced, and the basis upon which such levels were identified. Where alternative measures are available to mitigate an impact, each should be discussed and the basis for selecting one alternative should be identified. - Energy conservation measures, including both the available alternatives and those incorporated into the design and operation of the proposed project, 25.41 (7) h shall be discussed as mitigation measures. There T are many ways in which a project may be designed or operated to cause less energy to be consumed, both directly and indirectly. Examples include but are not limited to: R - Insulation and other protection from heat loss or heat gain to conserve fuel used to heat or cool buildings and mobile homes. . - Use of resource conserving forms of energy such as solar energy for ;eater and space heating, wind for operating pumps, and falling water for gencrat-ing electricity. - E►n,gy efficient building design including such features as orientation of structures to summer and winter sunlight .to absorb winter solar heat and reflect or avoid .surrmer solar heat. - treasures to reduce energy consumption in 1 transportation such as: , - Providing access to alternative means of t -transportation for people such as bus lines, I mass transit, bicycle lanes, and pedestrian facilities. - Use of small cars rather than large cars where possible. . - Use of alternative means of shipping which allow for energy savings. Efficient .lighting practices including use of indirect natural light, use. of efficient light- ing fixtures, establishment of reasonable lighting criteria to prevent over illumination, and minimum use of architectural or display J - lighting. - Energy conserving construction- practices. - Use of energy conservation devices such as flywheels. - Rate structures which discourage unnecessary -- - energy consumption. 25.41 (8) I - - Use of human or animal power where such use is feasible. - - Waste heat recovery. - Recycling and use of recycled materials. - (4) Alternatives to the Proposed Action: Describe any known alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the project, and why they were rejected in favor of the ultii,iate choice. The specific alterrati:ve of "no protect" must also 0;•ra.ys be evaluated, along with the iimpact. Describe a.?ternatives capable of substantially reducing or eliminati;ig any environmentally adverse impacts, even if these alternatives substantially impede the attainment of the project objectives, and are more costly. (5) The Reliationship Between l_oca.l Short-Term Uses of Man' s Environment and the h'aintenance and Enh ancement of Long-1erm�Productivity: — — Describe the cumulative and long-term effects cf the proposed project which adversely affect the state of the J env ir'onn;ent. Describe impacts v!hich narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment or pose long-term risks to health or safety. In addition, the reasons why the proposed project is believed by the sponsor to be justified now,. rather than reserving an option for further alterna- tives, should be explained. Any Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would be Involved in the Proposed Action Should .it be Implemented: Uses of renewable and nonrenewable resources during the initial and continued phases of the project are basically irreversible since a large commitment of resources makes removal or nonuse thereafter unlikely. Primary impacts and, particularly, secondary impacts (such as a highway improvement which provides access to a nonaccessible area) generally commit future generations to similar uses. Also irreversible damage can result from environmental accidents associated with the project. Any irretrievable _T commitments of resources shall be evaluated to assure that such current consumption is justified. f 25.41 (9) 1 . (7) The Growth-Inducing Impact of the Action: Discuss the ways in which the proposed project could foster population growth, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. Included in this are projects which would remove obstacles to population growth (a major expansion of a waste water treatment plant might, for example, allow for more construction in residential areas) . Increases in the population may further tax existing resources, so consideration must be given to this impact. With or without anticipated population growth as a result of the project, it should be recognized that some projects may encourage and facilitate other projects that could significantly a ffect the environment, either indi- _11 vidually or cumu laLi;�ely. This aspe t must be discussed as well . It must not be assumed that growth in any area is nece;sari ly beneficial , detriment; 1 , or of little significance to the environment. 25.41-6.04 Identification of Agencies Consulted The Identity of all federal , state or local agencies, other organiza- tions and private individuals consulted in preparing the EIR, and the identity of the persons, firm or agency preparing the ,EIR, by contract or other authorization must be given. 25.4.1-6.05 Water Quality Affects Vater quality aspects of the proposed project (which have been previously certified by the appropriate state or interstate organiza- tion as being in substantial compliance with applicable water quality standards) .shall be described in the environmental setting section, and other sections where applicable. 25.41-7 Consultation and Review Procedures The Director of Environmental Services, or his designate, shall be responsible for assuring that the Draft Environmental Impact Report is circulated to public agencies having jurisdiction by law with respect to the project and that persons having special expertise with respect to any .environmental impact involved are consulted. In addition, copies of the Draft EIR shall be made available through the public library to. the general public. A forty-five (45) day review period for the Draft EIR is established. 25.41 (10) :e .ti J� Statf Only Case r70 . CA TTRZ37 1t e c e i p t o . fJIt7J101-G t Received by�. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM TRAC,L82;3i CITY OF PALM DESERT -741.9500 TO ACCOMPANY APPLICATION FOR Tentative Map Tract 8237 . (Type of Permit) LOCATION South side Magnesia Falls Drive, Palm Desert, Calif Address APPLICANT USLIFE Savings and Loan 5220 Wilshire Blvd Los Angeles .Cal 90036 (Please print) Address Telephone I. Background In€ormation .213-937-2450 1. Briefly describe the nature of the project or activity. Single. .family residential s.ubdi.vision ..of 185 lots on approx. . 54 .acres. Owner to construct moderate cost housing on recorded lots: 2. General location. South of Magnesia Falls, West of 'Deep-Canyon, North of existing houses, East of community park and .middle school .. : 3. Legal description of project site. A portion of the S.W. 1/4 of Sec. 16, T5S-R6E, S.S.6.&M. 4. Describe the project: area, including distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics. Project .area vacant, level, .and unimproved.: Surrounded by developed areas including community park andschools on west, existing residences and church on south, date grove on east, and major storm drain channel (Wh:itewater River) on north. . 5.' Is . the project a phase or a portion of a larger project? If so, identify larger project. Yes-"Dream Homes" area. Project area formerly Tentative Tract 2447 as part of "Dream Homes" project but never recorded.or constructed. 5. Has an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Report previously been prepared that includes the project? If so, give date submitted and title of. pro*ect . Yes- City of Palm Desert General Plan,. and Zoning, Subdivision; and other` other ordinances regulating land use and development. Dates not known.. 7. List every other public agency from whom a lease, permit , license , certificate, ar other entitlement for use is necessary before completion of the project . All required for subdivision approval and recordation. 1 II. Assessment of Environmental. Impact Please answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (The applicant should be able to explain or' substantiate his response to every question. ) A. Characteristics of the Natural Environment YES NO 1 . Land (Topography, Soils, Geology). a. Does the. project site involve a unique landform or biological area, such as beaches, sand dunes , marshes , etc:? X . b. Will the project involve construction ..on slopes of 25% or greater? X c. Is the project to be located in an area of soil instability (substance, landslide or severe erosion) ? X. d. Is the project site located on , or adjacent to a known earthquake fault? �^ 2. Water . a . Is the project located within a flood plain? X b. Does the project involve a natural drainage channel or streambed? X 3 . Flora and fauna a. Are there any rare or endangered species of plant life in the project area? X b. Will any mature trees be removed or relocated? X C . Is the project site adjacent to, or does it include a habitat , food source , water source, nesting place or breeding place for a rare or endangered wildlife species? X d. Could the project affect fish, wildlife , reptiles, or plant life? X e. Is the project located inside or within 200 ft . of a fish or wild- life refuge or reserve? X YES N0 4. Potential Alteration to Natural. Features a. Will the project result in the removal of a natural resource for commercial purposes (including rock, sand, gravel , oil , trees , or minerals? X b . Will the project involve grading in excess of 300 cubic yards? X B. Potential Direct Impact of Project 1. Impact on existing physical .sur.roundings a. Pollution (Air, water , noise , Iand) (1) Will the project create dust, X fumes, smoke or odors? (2) Will the project involve the burning of any material , in" eluding brush, trees and con- struction materials : X (3) Is the project expected to result in the generation of noise levels in excess of those currently existing in the area? X (4) Will the project involve the application use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials , including pesticides , herbicides , other toxic substances or radio- active material? X b . Applicable Pollution Controls and Standards (1) Will the project require a permit or other approval from any of the following agencies : X . State or Regional Water Resources Control Board X County Health Officer X Air Pollution Control Dist . X City or County Planning Commission X U. S . Environmental Protection Agency X County Airport Land Use . Com. _X 3 YES '. NO (2) Does the project require variance from established environ- mental standards (e . g . , air quality, noise , water quality) ? X 2 . Impact on existing facilities and services a. Circulation . (1) Is the project expected to cause noticeable increase in pedestrian traffic or' a change in pedestrian patterns? o X (2) Will the project result in • noticeable changes in vehicular traffic patterns or volumes (including bicycles) ? X (3) Will the project involve the use of off-the-road. vehicles of any kind (such as trail bikes) ? X b. Water Supply and Sewage Disposal (1) [•Till the project entail the acquisition of water from wells or surface sources for commercial and/or domestic use? X (2) Will septic tanks be utilized for sewage disposal? X C. Demand for Service from Special Districts and/or Municipalities or County (1) Will the project require the extension of existing public utility lines? X (2) Will the project require public services from an agency, district or public utility which is currently operating at or near capacity? X 3. Miscellaneous a. Will the project employ equipment which could interfere with existing communication and/or defense systems? X b. Is the project located within the flight path or noise impact area of an airport? X k YES NO C. Potential Indirect Impact of Project 1. Land Use a. Is the proposed project expected to result in other changes in land use , either on or off the project site? X b. Could the project serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas, or increase -in development intensity of already developed areas (examples include the introduction of new or expanded public utilities, new industry, commercial facilities . or recreation activities) ? X c. Is the project adjacent to or within 500 €t . of an existing public facility or site for same? X d. Is the project inconsistent with any adopted general plan; specific plan or present zoning? X e. Does the project involve lands : currently protected under the Williamson Act or an Open Space Easement? - X 2. Visual Impact a. Is the site for the proposed project adjacent to a designated Scenic Highway or within a Scenic Corridor? X b. Will the project obstruct any scenic view from existing residential areas, public lands , or public roads? X 3. Social/Cultural Impact a. Will the project require the re- location of housing or business in order to clear the project site? X b. Does the project site include or affect a known historical or archeological site? X 5 III. Statement as to Significant Environmental Fffect If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section II , but believe the project will have no significant adverse environmental effect, indicate your reasons below. A3b Existing tamarisk trees in poor condition on north line may have to be removed for Magnesia Falls Drive. Major part of this windbreak could remain if street construction delayed until warranted by traffic demands. A4b, B'lal&3 Grading., road, and utility construction with probable attendant short- term nuisance of minor dust and noise .will occur, similar to any construction project. All work .will conform to applicable City Regulations. Blbl Routine agency approvals- as required for subdivision processing only.: 62alt2 Some routine traffic from new residences will occur similar to adjacent areas. Project area may. result in alternate pedestrian and bicycle routes from neighboring residences to school , park, ann church. facilities. Clc. Existing public facilities: 2 schools, park, church, and. storm channel . All compatable and complementary with proposed project and vice-versa. . To the best of my knowledge, the above information- is true and comDiete. Date_ July .1 , 1976 Signed USLIFE Savings and Loan., Owner (Project S.ponsor) B y c T i e !�'S Phone 213-537-2450 6 • i e•� � a oaf rU 45-275 PRICKLI' PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAL.IFORNIA 32260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 July 26, 1976 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Project: DRAFT EIR FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION Case No. : TRACT 8237 Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Tentative Map. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval . The City -is interested in the .probable impacts on the natural environment: (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals , parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc. ) . Your recommendations should be returned to the Department of Environmental Services, P:, 0. Box 1977, Palm Desert, CA. 92260, no later than August 26, 1976. Very truly, yogrs , STEPHEIV A. FLESIIMAN Acting Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert, California Attachment (as noted) SAF/mj ?2-3`7 /97/0 AGENCIES TO BE NOTIFIED - EIR' s M. Kenneally, Chief Engineer AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT - Riverside County Riverside, Calif. 92509 787-2416 Lowell 0. Weeks General Manager - Chief Engineer COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT P. 0. Box 1058 Coachella, Calif. 92236 (714) 398-2651 R. E. Deffebach Director - District 8 California Dept. of Transportation P. 0. Box 231 San Bernardino, Calif. 92403 (714) 383-4578 .Gerald i7 CY2Sv p'ccti cr " County of Riverside Planning Commission 46-209 Oasis St. , Room 304 Indio, Calif. 92201 347-8511 , XT 277 , 78, 79 ZP. 'ft roc f� o 2 / eyo - as 0 3 -3 Indio, C� 7 Dan Scanny Foreman/Mails U. S. Post Office Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 346-3864 Joe Benes , V.P . and General Manager or " James De Friend, Chief Technician - �( COACHELLA VALLEY TELEVISION P. 0. Box 368 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 346-8157 PALM DESERT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE P. 0. Box 908 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 346-6111 James Whitehead Superintendent District 6 STATE PARKS AND RECREATION 1350 Front St. , Room 6054 San Diego , Calif . 92101 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT u — —r�t•t .,�az—r.. Riverside, Calif. 92507 /4 Attn: William Collins (714) 787-1-"5- -2- PALM DESERT PROPERTY OWNER'S ASSN. F 0, BoX 12 4+ Palm Desert , Calif. 92260 Karl Kelsey, Secretary COACHELLA VALLEY SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT 45-926 Oasis St . , Suite A Indio, Calif. 92201 John Mangione, City Planner P. 0. Box 1786 Palm Springs City Hall Palm Springs , Calis . 92262 323-2661 , XT. 231 Bill Northrup , Planning Director INDIO CITY HALL P . .0. Drawer 1788 Indio, Calif. 92201 347-2351, XT. 27 Gary Wiedle COACHELLA VALLEY ASSN. OF GOVTS . (CVAG) Y HMS Plaza, Suite 4 /\ 74-133 E1 Paseo Palm Desert , Calif. 92260 D. R. MacPherson COLLEGE OF THE DESERT 43-500 Monterey Avenue Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 346-8041 Don Shayler PACIFIC RIM 73-893 Highway 111 Palm Desert, Calif. 346-6165 Richard Rust Campus Planner UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT RIVERSIDE Riverside, Calif. COACHELLA VALLEY RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT 46-440 Jackson Indio, Calif. 92201 Captain Byrd Riverside County Sheriff' s Office l� P. 0. Box 1617 Indio, Calif. 92201 347-3571 RIVERSIDE COUNTY AIRPORTS DIRECTOR 3865 Orange St. , Suite 2 Riverside, Calif. 92501 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSN. OF GOVERNMENTS L. A. , Calif. 90017 X'/ . -3- COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH PLANNING ASSN. OF RIVERSIDE 4275 Lemon St. , Suite 210 Riverside, Calif. 92501 Attn: Executive Secretary R. W. Riddell - FAUN WE.L.D00 Engineering Dept. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. P. 0. Box 2200 Riverside, Calif. 92506 327-8531, ask for Riverside XT 214 Roger Harlow Director Pupil Personnel Service DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 83-049 Avenue 46 Indio, Calif. 92201 347-4071 Jim Langdon `. PALM DESERT DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC. 36-711 Cathedral Canyon Drive P. 0. Drawer LL Cathedral City, Calif. 92234 328-2585 or 328-4687 Stanley Sayles , President - PALM DESERT COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 44-500 Portola Ave. Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 346-6338 Moe Kazem Regional Water Quality Control Board VAIerado River Basin Region -7 3-2 7i Lloyd Rogers , Supervisor RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. / County Administration Bldg. / 46-209 Oasis St. , Room 107 Indio, Calif. 92201 347-8511, XT 287 r,.,,,,, n a tr + u!-dg �$1 Harry Schmitz Director of Planning & Building 45-300 Club Drive Indian Wells , Calif. 92260 William Probert Director of Planning 69-825 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, Calif. 92270 328-8871 Kermit Martin SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. P. 0. Box 203 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 346-8660 -4- D. M. Pinkstaff Area Construction Supervisor GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 83-793 Avenue 47 Indio, Calif. 92201 347-2711 Karen Fowler LIVING DESERT RESERVE 47-900 Portola Ave . Palm Desert , Calif . 92260 346-6555 James M. Doyle, Supervisor History Preservation Dept. ^�( Parks & Recreation P. 0. Box 2390 Sacramento, CA 95811 (916) 445-8006 Riverside Museum Associates /X` 3720 Orange St. Riverside, CA 92507 Todd Beeler Riverside County Planning Dept, 4080 Lemon St. Riverside, Calif. 92501 (714). 787-6181 �x /5// 2-2 G l ' y" t3 an .aeo Q c� a'o c xley J h - hk Ge cn. c-,o�t `� �. A ec- w� irac(e a . 164 —qw xk W-�e� I 40-L �,4 cc� M w-au cam °f ►L kocLo k4 dozoe a, ` t Pay O-daj--Olj rRo N3 Rq,•7 cS��rc`S i J' f pES f� s �:, �.. JAN30 . r d Pv 1979 .Saj �. Yn q�,a�o TRACT 8237 PROPOSED NAME Street "A" - Santolina Drive "B" - Buttonwood Drive "C" - Balsam Lane "D" - Silk Tree Lane "E" - Gazania Place "F" - Myrsine Avenue "G" - Palmilla Circle "H" - Vanda Circle Alternates - Angelica Lobelle Marlock Muscari o a F o I ° � t t,u. L1 V POR U D � � N n u• F • ,�� 6� v No o' .0 Y+ Cti C U� a G m a w ,� lA v ° s� t� c.. O b �) Yl q /12 3`' cR Sll.o A yr, H /R H � 4 62/- 45 T C. A. 2 4 POR. S SW SEC. 16 T. 5 S. R. 6E. 5 a• x 4 t I•�,� n f 'r• - — --_—_ -_.--_ - i F _--..met - 4`/ o' 4 7 9 �J ;4 " o ,9. A. "2319 Pc Br B..s •�' _ v /9 F h ti d r _ _ 8 o DESERT STAR � BC e i •G !i is Cr ai ooi � _` - ZS `� 455 3 /04 r ;�p s zS I. 3� N �� - 6 Jr, ( ; ) ` I 36 v /03 O o i 7 O ) e °, "9 y, -4 Q ° Qq _ I r. 37 u: •� Aj �:° �I /a5 I`` �C� 8757 11519 � Z /02 80 O s 9 mi q 34 Z I m ZJ 37 �. 36 _ r �_ =7 i r `t% I 3 ` \ly � p i 452 k , b/ m 28 f -o`�; � m - m 33 c35 co /00 39 e \e 1 ' Q \ " "4,L \ /CB — v 34 32 01 C . ! 40 t� a 99 /09 f �s ° o- . � I 13 //D o st X v L O 3/ So 4/ ; i 98 s _ r N 4 0 9 eq ` TE OL O NO. N£W NO I i I l r i4 M.B. 36178-79 Shadow Vi//age Uni/ No / 46 Q� a 3/ ' <` —rt-- MB 3815/-52 No 2 �� :`• �~ M.B. 461 75- 76 TraCI No. 2529 s 1 D.47".4 R/S 41,'=2 — S_,F.SSOR'S PG 45 WERS/DE COJN' '. CALIF Tj _.-- " PORTOL A N` - OFi ; Sv-, — __I .40 _. y 95 41 40 QN W � \ > r 0 0 6 7dDI WV 1 �f � C i, J O 5l n •01 y"G J / O V I J n` J \ I 1 rY M Pf. 4 � � u � � W�•oo c \ V 9 \ �(�� W T B9f f y \ M1 (J) / o v �h 1 sr, Cb Cb J J14 C D I<L V m m .'C �.. Ql 1 ko v s kN co � N V N • N w \4D � \...� A 1s' ZS / I 1 1 . . y. � 1 o � I I I•► No W I710Y2 .�r ,o ..z.s o s n •� � 1 'V f) O r Y J '1 1 o I n N b A � w I y V �co _3 V1 0 FLORINS - AVE. °'� J n I 1 W Y C; I .y j, F DEEP CANYON vc - v ' h� _� Tm \ N }II z _ i � LL1 �'V •� co }V I 40 4.10 . o n � N /o/.3A 0 44 I I } oD v J (10 CO • I I 4 ' �_ ILI FL OR/NE 4VE. . r d 1 + • P P O �^ F6 r2S05 T248L (,� .T v) i I ' n r v 7 - n I n � I =� w LFff' ('ANA v F'L' 53 ------------- — '4 nti I LI' m f, :204 03 �'1 y 21 i I ) hl . \J L �J I V 0' n r' ( ) 'Q � n oy � cl) �h t7 a rn �l �F O n� ati _ •1 VJ � /Dlll� 9/7/ �- � A - - - COOK— — � - - - - - - - - - /- ST- - - - - - - I � I,I I .TI xI VI e 111 � I - NO I I � I t,� L I 1 1. G I v I ry I V ( i I N i I , I I � I � I v LA 10 ST I � Ul I � I I I I i 1 n n I to I I <� I 0 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Hunter Cook, .City Engineer FROM: Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services SUBJECT: The Frank Goodman Tract No. 8237 DATE: April 21, 1977 I have been in. conversation with Mr. Goodman regarding the design of the right-of- way of Rutledge Way as. a part of his Tract No. 8237 and its relationship to his required park dedication. His inquiry dealt with whether up to 14 foot of the required design of Rutledge Way could be taken out of his required park dedication of 2.74+ acres. In review of the conditions as specified in the Council Resolution approving said Tract, I find .that no sidewalk was required as a part of Rutledge Way in the park area. Therefore, I informed Mr. Goodman that I would write you and ex- press my opinion that since no sidewalk was required along the park frontage, that no parkway was therefore necessary along said frontage and in fact the street design of Rutledge Way could be reduced by the width of the parkway, four or five feet. If you agree with this concept, I think you should consider it in your evaluation of the Final Tract Map. If you wish to discuss this with mee, please feel free to con- tact me. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, DIRECTOR i2sCSIVED DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES APR 2 7 1977 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES cc: Tract No. 8237 CITY OF PALM DESERT SHEET I OF / SHEET 67 ' eN�iueea's Notes IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORN/A RECORDERS CERTIFICATE LOASI>OF EQARM4+ I1 a LAM5eVr 5ZID - - Ld 1s • l�7-Z��IJ > e 4 �QUYtY OF RTVEZfID�. TRACT 8237 — i L.e IWOICAlet FOUND M0.1UMe. P45NOWY t/ 1 !.O INOICete+ Set MOYU U1Eu'1 ^4 mole-o Fre{ZJ•� V.D.rielegh,Ceu QrCo+dcr I 4,eej 4'+2'ceowoco 31A1 e. mo u.Al ALL coo—F BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE w,.•3A'" ey, UULC»OJaeR G to oleo. SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION /6, T,5S.R6E.,S8B,8M, .t s.c1114'1 a41 Cow1A1Y# 1.206 A4a 4.4R01f. . a Ll .rw.a WA L3eT M cure orwslTe Fropern DECEMBER /976 SCALE•/'•30' 'Soedn.o•lw �^<<" t tt 1. LOT coR ees. PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS 1 ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE CITY CLERKS CERTIFICATE ` I—"A, certify"h t Cam a eeglefe.+d C.11 I,3Mb e.411\:qon,Aaig C11y C4rK op•geld Gl1y e Engine« of*ne State oP Colt}'ornla and thot+h:b Fpin OrSi1,do M.eMt urf.fK fie}1tia mop wo.. map cenete d o/'onr(l)•SY1er1 corn.otiy rrprryen#3 presrnied to ytlr Ib.inc:l of dad C•}y oC Wlm a euruey made u151. my eVpewieion duel tly Cr.e.F a# o�q u1e.meet{eg tha,eoLt he}.t en ilx Decrmp.r oQ 1914 iha#all monumen}O eYlewn de.� eC F2i lea,�a 14wt ttleveupen cold Hereon ac}ualy p�tt4} and the1. poe}ibne are Cfly Cwncil aid by on ad..duly pwerd a,d r�de.ed AlF•aw cormcfly ehown,or wt\\b•M p\aee w:#h:n err 'bid mop end occrp}#ly ._.iceh'en>shown h«ro,,. /iL-"SC/TT ,li FJvi3v tJ/J//-/O'/J .�+.:/-//icv/J/57/!/�T yeor Rrom recorda#ieCl eF ih:a rtap.Chr menyelmto ppted ihls/�dey eQ �^�••^',191 L (//LOR /I^L1V. i}M N.N•.(1V. - The e•.,.,G��1rJe aed neW r+hr eugv.. tob..tee<rd. a•w i�woo �IL—,A_ Rgieb.vd G.:1 fagirwr w.uoee .P!/TLe06E AVENUE i.,wni.°„r`.ies, t'c4cnq T«py'F c(1r A jo * ° 1 ' i , I + Stoe 7730 77.70 77.33 7alCP,1\ J� - _ • . CITY ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE ¢ } TAX COLLECTORS CERTIFICATE ��'ll�� w ♦ O $ w a o. `L I hrneey<r IiN ghat I have evomtned+hie map y6 . V 6♦ ;i .O 1� and�'ow+d;}+o br eubeh,Mtol1,the dome ae l} • �. 1 Z\ . 2 0 :0 appearee on the trertot:ve mop ei sl i h.rrby rntify the#accoAl�10 1.r mM3 of p.a♦, ae {tlyd,amendrd and aped? .r by4 isle Clty 1n:> oFftu,aS e7 Mlr de1Y,yN.r eti ne ll•nr ogel bf 1• CoVnctl on 14 Octobry 1ll4,thr erpfm#:en OoN w\p the pn>prAy lbwn enlh..Yun mop•br unpeid te#ute, �l wl.Mw-r 14 IX#eber 1ln;tint oil prrvi>iem et o tralw.3ta}•L.w Ceurdy Mvn.cipal,or bml ta.ra er rpeebl n.•. �and C:_ N GLqulaNem have boon complied wNh1oM Araebmr.he eeltrctb oe taxer_ ' /!'.P/W fu srSr_r I I 13/.e1 ti.rr r� tbt Z om ea>idpted thte map le tL•dwlublly ca'm_-}. � /!<A'•eo.Yt'e.t/X/[ NIY59tNY.tIJ.IS see re. W}d�LB.9//RyH 712 AV.ISs1! b7vh J�•ra% I Wted/a=�...n.,�A 71 Hunt«Cmk OttlJ�trild�t49Y E^"^IV Tex l'sd1rC}or 1SO" .� ey°�Yr �'.�e• i °'rwtY - is f•r 54 ere.r ay" ]r..r—•oe... 7itGCT s S2� .� _ W4 I.I.tl.irk/71"•M I .. SOILS REPORT Y Pw� by an •Hi1.4b1e7'1• 1•. ,iif7$ d 1<>ti.q Con>vlten}s inc.en-}M ll'n ae♦oC 1517 o> regut red by+hr Subdwcnon tlep Act. } • l + OWNERS CERTIFICATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS W.Mrrby c.vh Fy thal w. ew ♦h.ew,vrr of#M land S1vb d Cel.fa.n:a 1 } ♦ . inC4drd within ih. a«bdt.,ijan>l.wln hefrenlm�rrMenh [<•nM oFU•nwl.-e..r 33 1 /' t P••.en>«bY een>.nt le•vicee>nry tb Fo.a a dw•t1tN b satl bed. eN thel w con>ro1 to the rM4,rq and ve CeMiny d yw i>sW.fi.r�>ton tnap e, !.hewn wiMn IM mbnd oonfrf lin.1 w.h...by dM�mb t. - o NoMry Pub1.[ i eM i'or Bald�pw1#y and ' NWis u+a tw otw.l Stote,pevx^oily apprn•rd d^ ^�'�� known a mr pweor.Ler♦ 1 W. 1..ryc.y drdc<oN ha ye u{�'Vtle 9vestdanl aM Anoa_� ;�:fn1 Krown f4e1,c >. -(er p.rbl�e Ui�h1y,.J�a.wo11[,end ff .t hw pu•pDM. tome tb br+i'.. �ICC!C�G'�.� C UJL1Fe Sa�:IVI> and } e G.«< loot wW .e>.m.n!d.+gro1N M.ron a."1'I.U.e." Laon Aw+oc:a}ien,lrv� Cwpo ohon iMF etleeu{ed itr w.iMn ,� ' nehwnent o•d Known to mn to be 4he pe.tem wb e,raUled l , yfie wd\:n 'v.s}rumen}on beholC eC Sotd Ce.po,e}Con•eM � u3L1FE -1ev�NS and Lmn 4srecta}.on, I ockrow lodged ib a tM# Such C,o•pera}ion e.aculed 4hr 1 1 p Cab ib.me corpora}ion ✓W,>_ wi M.tt'n 'n44}.umenl puaUan} -b Nivv by low. o. a Qreelu#vn l BCNIp�Via. re>id oC 11. tMe.d eC D:roc w.. 3 I!'L .j ^ W./neH ml herd and OPCiclai sbl , 1 � -Qrcr C My Commi r',an Eap..rr�'4:11.JI,o111e ^. f+c,..• / � `!ter (............................ ..F,q-I�i.rpu + 'f �v �;-; t•` ' ualo y TebL�a,d j'ev +b�d ' .M r^._- u„nn • ^'� ' (aunty end 3tulr F'w nl t INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert . t t. TO: Hunter Cook, City Engineer FROM: Paul A. Williams, Director of Environmental Services SUBJECT: The Frank Goodman Tract No. 8237 DATE: April 21, 1977 I have been in conversation with Mr. Goodman regarding the design of the right-of- way of Rutledge Way as a part of his Tract No. 8237 and its relationship to his required park dedication. His inquiry dealt with whether up to 14 foot of the , required design of Rutledge Way could be taken out of his required park dedication of 2.74+ acres. In review of the conditions as specified in the Council Resolution approving said Tract, I find that no sidewalk was required as a part of Rutledge Way in the park area. Therefore, I informed Mr. Goodman that I would write "you and ex- press my opinion that since no. sidewalk was required along the park frontage, that no parkway was therefore necessary along said frontage and in fact the street design of Rutledge Way could be reduced by the width of the parkway, four or five feet. If you agree with this concept, I think you should consider it in your evaluation of the Final Tract Map. If you wish to discuss this with mee, please feel free to con- tact me. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES cc: Tract No. 8237 25-8-24 -: 62/— 44 T C. A. /80/ N 2 SW 4 SEC. /6 T. 5S. R.6 E. 40 �oZ W 400/7 PL i MAGNESIA FALLS RD• c��`yo (30 3g 89' I237.617' & / = zoo' u 4 rcQ 0361 a DATE OLD NO NEW NO I /—'� 10175 801 007 I a 7 a 61, t� VBG8 Lie4, 3/77 1 9 -9 27,42l AC PG 45 ,» �49 1 rf ti s° i; RUTLEDGE WAY ,P=B83 Jc A' 3 s,a SEE MAP 45 , P 1 N C45) .47 I I DA TA R/S 41132 GAO P A- ASSESSOR'S MAP SK 621 PG. 44 RIVERS/DE COUNTY, CALIF. 25-8-18 621- 45 -8 —24 T C A. /80/, /802 rt5 e ft87237- - — -- — — -- — P—OR.-�S SW 4 SEC. /6 /7 sa LOT A y 77 715 /6 107 " 2 3 4 5 0 44 a•�� B /9 V 2� (6 80 /7.5 77 7 7796 65) tzsz9 , ,% 9° / 2 3 4 g n -. 7 8 9 '(' ,3 a � sb 0 45/ 01 01 r 3 4 V I� to t as Q p, �(/yam) /9 /UOr I J J U ge.s4 ° v' S° OL, 3 t 619 1 t2519 94 05 8D i.1V9 B° F. .. J�.5 3 ecs 3 Pc a Z.3o /9 a N69e97 y' _ a @ 20 g. sL a DESERT STAR �J gO.at �J 2/ B7.s7 go ,0 92 s° cv°i B°°t 6 z5 v 2s zs ± m U I Zs 455 —` e zs 5� 36 " /03 o o l� /04 f 37 �� 23 '° 0 J r P ° r J1 24 87.5v / 6 38 Dr, dls° n 26 739 / �71 si is 105 g : B>st tzsz9 102 rZ3 ZJ F a 3s ,34 m 37 /^ P 0 o6JL ? Z\ ° �d p 3) 452 /06 p J a8 ?i 3 3, 453 1°619 7 454 35 ) f r v II it a _i3 �i4o9 e 07 10 °cf } 29 ,py� It7 Q � /00 39 p411, �i.. 108 32 J SIv e II 34 ° 7t " 40 ti 99 /09 ' �'t \ '0�•°'• 30 //0 o 3/ So 4/ ; Bi 98 7 \ 4-4 32 0A fE OLD NO. NEW NO. 3/77 440-009 451-1822 \ s Q � �4 M.S. 36/78-79 Shodow VV IGge Uni/ No. h M. B 381 ,51-52 No. 2 t °' Tls2! M. B. 461 75- 76 TYOC1 NO. 2529 s -Z DA TA R/S 411,32 ASSESSOR'S MAP 8K. 621 , PG. 45 RIVERSIDE COC/NTY, CALIF. OCT. 1957 ` k 4. d �• h W� Z S CBS (g izs/ e a Ob NO,(N d0 d330 a � J Z. m r � O V W � O a � r � Q 10' h Zc AM CB ZB471 Qj V 7 r31IV 31VI807Y� M 1. 74 SZ S 2 � SL SL aN � a oo � � � , 0 n O` r ' I W I 1 N � n ONO M � � o N 0 O N O1116 Qi Q ( a a V 9 9Z f(�w ri iB7 A SZ Zoe -V I e O rn t o,9 m O O 2 I ; W - -�l o O d r, f ,L'egena� EX/5T1N6 ———--— PROPOSED I�zoil, Tract 8,237 CITY OF PALM DESERT �h'/T•ec�yq)E�4 SToR� cy9NyE< I I----� A-ST• ICA hl----� I I J Li / � --�----ST ST �� �---STAG Jyl Y ER/N ST• Z i Q � OR/VE W Q Q ,NAR/60LD pR. 1 VE Q 0 • 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 5, 1977 To All Interested Parties Subject: Street Names for Tract 8237 The City of Palm Desert is currently considering the request for approval of street names for Tract 8237. Please review the attached map and list of names proposed for the subdivision to determine..whe- ther they are acceptable or should be modified. All comments should be returned to the Department of Environmental Services, P. 0. Box 1977, Palm Desert, California 92260, or call Mr. Sam Freed at (714) 346-0611, ext. 51. ry truly yours, PAUL A. WILLIAMS, DIRECTOR Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert, California PAW/mj cc: Lt. Froemming, Riverside County Sheriff's Department Riverside County Road Department, Indio and Riverside Offices Postal Service, Palm Desert Branch Bud Engle, Palm Desert Fire Marshall Hunter Cook, Palm Desert City Engineer Coachella Valley County Water District Southern California Edison Southern California Gas General Telephone RIVERSIDE COUNTY BERNARD J. CLARK, SHERIFF E �� PHONE 714.347-3571 INDIO, CALIFORNIA April 8, 1977 Paul A. Williams, Director Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, California _. Dear Mr. Williams: In response to your letter of April 5, 1977 concerning street names for Tract 8237. Our office has reviewed the proposed street names and additional alternates in conjunction with the map furnished. We find no objection to the names as proposed. Sincerely, BEN CLARK, SHERIFF D. E. Froemming, Lieutena Indio Station vrc R CF � ) APR 14 IS77 ENVIRONMENTAL SRVICES CITY OF PALME MINUTES �• REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MELTING y X. ORDINANCES (Continued) For Introduction: (Continued) ORDINANCE NO. 223 (Continued) hearing. Because of that, Staff is requesting that Council set a public hearing for July 10, 1980, at 7 :00 p .m. in City all Council Chambers . Counci an Puluqi questioned the report that a large home could have a great r assessment. Mr. Bouman explained that a large house could equal two equivalent dwelling units and therefore have a greater fee imposed. He reviewed the formula. Mayor Pro-Tem McPherson pointed out\that the house would have to be the size of the Annenberg Estate or the Bob Hope Estate. Councilman Puluqi stated that he didn't believe that was the intent of the ballot measure and requested the City Attorney to investigate the matter before the public hearing. Council so dir cted the City Attorney. Councilman Snyder moved and Mayor Pro-Tem McPherson seconded to order a public hearing for July 10, 1980, at 7 :00 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers for the purpose\of receiving public input relative to the proposed Special Fire Tax rate. Motion carried unanimously. B . ORDINANCE NO. 22�► - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PURCASHING POLICY AND PROCEDlhRiS. Mr. Bouman stated th t since the inception of the City on November 26 , 1973 , w have been admonished by the auditors that we need a purcha ing ordinance. It is a requirement of State law and although we have conformed to recognized standard and legal purchasing pr ctices , we have never had an ordinance. He reviewed the provisio of the proposed ordinance. Y �' Councilman Snyder moved and % or Pro-Tem McPherson seconded to waive further reading and pass OrdinaAce No. 224 to second reading. Motion carried unanimously. For Adoption: None XI. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS HELD OVER None XII. NEW BUSINESS A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1 . Mr. Bouman stated that Council had been formally presented with a finalized copy of the proposed budget . He reviewed the major items included in the budget, p inting out that a 40% decrease in building activity was anticipated. Staff has already been reduced, and there will p� bably be more as the decrease becomes more reality. Councilman Snyder moved and Mayor Pro-Tem McPhers n seconded to continue the item to the meeting of June 26, 1980, and instruct the City Clerk to legally advertise the issue as a Public Hearing. \ Motion carried unanimously. B. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHP '�i� L ASSESS- MENT TAX FOR STREET LIGHT CHARGES FOR RACT NO. 37 . Mr. Beebe reported that this District had been initiated in June, 1979 . The monies required for fiscal year 1980-81 would be approximately $1 , 800. The balance remaining from the pre- vious fiscal year is estimated to be $885 . 00. Therefore, the special assessment tax proposed to be levied would be $915 . June 12, 1980 Page 6 D'U(h� ' MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL M1 ING J. J. .J\. J� iC „ �V �� iC ! iC � i� i� •l� J� �L J. J. J. J� J J. 4 J� J J. J. .�. �. J. J. J; . J J. �. J. J` XII. NEW BUSINESS (Continued) B. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TAX FOR STREET LIGHT CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 7 Continue Mayor Pro-Tem McPherson moved and Councilman Puluqi seconded to waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 80-73 , establishing a special assessment levy for maintenance and .operation of a street lighting district. Motion carried unanimously. C. hFEQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TM FOR LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 2 . Mr. eebe reported that this was a district created last year for t\and s Homes property on Haystack Road. The District was aion of approval. They have not yet installed eithetreet lights or the landscaping. Therefore, the monierom last year is ample. However, it was decided by thttorney that only a token assessment of $1 . 05 per parce be assessed per parcel. Mayor Pro erson moved and Councilman Newbrander seconded to waive further red adopt Resolution No. 80-74. Motion carried unani- mously. D. REQUEPPRO OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE FOR THE LM DESERT BRANCH LIBRARY. Mr. Bouman reported t at the City does own the library building and grounds , and we le se it to the City of Riverside for operation of the library. The lease is in three-year periods at a rate of $1 , 000 per mon h. The lease money is used to offset the cost of maintaining a d heating/cooling it. There is no attempt to make a profit o the lease. The Assistant City Manager has done a study, and he feels we can continue to lease it at the same rate o $1, 000 per month. Mayor Pro-Tem McPherson moved and .Councilman Newbrander seconded to approve the Agreement and authorize the M or and City Clerk to sign it. Motion carried unanimously. XIII. CONTINUING BUSINESS None XIV. OLD BUSINESS None XV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - B None XVI . REPORTS AND REMARKS A. CITY MANAGER None B. CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Erwin reported that in 1977 , the City accept d the property P Y on which the library was located. Apparently, however, we did not accept the parking lot. A signed deed for this property has been submitted to the City, and Mr. Erwin recommended accepting the property and authorizing the City Clerk to record it. Mayor Pro-Tem McPherson moved and Councilman Puluq i seco\,ded to accept the library property and authorize the City Clerk to record the deed. Motion carried unanimously. June 12, 1980 Page 7 _ r MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEz ING VI. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) E. REQUEST FOR ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT NO. 1023 - SAN PASCUAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. Rec : Accept the work as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder. F. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 14079 , PRO-CON DEVELOP- MENT CORPORATION, APPLICANT. Rec : Waive further reading and adopt Resolution No . 80-36 , approving Final Tract Map 14079 . G. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 15082 , DON LAWRENZ , APPLICANT. Rec : Waive further reading and adopt Resolution No. 80-37 , approving Final Tract Map 15082 . H. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAPS 14082, 14082-1 , AND , SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES , APPLICANT . Rec : Waive further reading and adopt Resolution Nos . 80-38, 80-39, and 80-40, approving Final Tract Maps 14082, 14082-1, and 14082-2, respectively. I. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF BONDS FOR TRACT N0. 8237 , AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, APPLICANT . _._. Rec : Accept the work as complete and authorize the City Clerk to release the bonds . J. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS For The 1979-80 Budget Street Resurfacing Program. Rec : Approve the request and authorize the City Clerk to call for bids . Councilman Brush moved and Mayor Pro-Tempore McPherson seconded to approved the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried unanimously. VII . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CASE NO. 16015* - MAYER GROUP, INC. , APPLICANT: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR 24 LOTS TO ALLOW 264 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND A 9 ACRE PUBLIC PARK ON APPROXIMATELY 39 ACRES IN THE PR-7 (U.A. ) ZONE AT THE NORTH- EAST CORNER OF MONTEREY AVENUE AND COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE . Mayor Mullins noted that the Council had met in Study Session prior to the Council Meeting, that discussion had been held on all matters on the Agenda, but that no decisions had been made. Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing open and asked for Staff ' s report . Mr. Williams reviewed the Staff Report and stated that the Planning Commission had held major discussion relative to drainage requirements and access to the site from Country Club Drive. The applicants requested they be required to pay drainage fees only rather than be responsible for implementation of the Master Plan of Drainage to the extent determined necessary by the City. Mr. Williams referred to a letter from the applicant addressing this issue and made a part of the Staff report . March 27 , 1980 Page 2 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Tract 8237 DATE: August 2, 1978 Please be advised, Paul , that the City of Palm Desert should require one tree per lot on Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road, and it is our recommendation that small rock be added between the sidewalk and the block walls and/or property line, whichever the case is applicable. (- 4 Aated Congthuction Co., one. January 22, 1979 City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Paul Williams f Re: Parkview Development Tract 8237 Palm Desert, Ca. Dear Paul: We have two hardship cases that we would like you to consider for early move-in ahead of fencing, sprinkling and landscaping. Lot 165- the buyers present home burned to the ground two weeks ago and he needs immediate possession. We will be ready to final by 1-26-79 and the fencing-landscaping should be done by February 9, 1979. �V Lot 120- this buyer has been forced to vacate his present home by 2-1-79. We anticipate.ybeing able to final pW by 2-1-79 but will not have the fencing,sprinkling Ira or landscaping complete. We anticipate the land- scaping will be bomplete by 2-28-79. If you will consider the above favorably, please let us know so we may act accordingly to accommodate these families. Sincerely, tr{ Richard R. Oliphant \ , 'A' s% RRO;hw EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 77-900 AVENUE OF THE STATES PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 PHONE: (714) 345-2626 FRANK R. GOODMAN,President Contractor's License No. 186863 RICHARD OLIPHANT, Vice President uA Aated Congthuction Co., gne- January- 22 , 1979 JAN231979 Mr. Lloyd Morgan CNVIRONMENTAL SaRV!CES Planning Technician CO Y: OF EALea 1?.-;r City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert , California 92260 Re : Tract 8237 , Palm Desert Dear Lloyd: The following is a list of houses in the Parkview subdivision which are ready for approval by the Planning Department prior to calling for final building inspeVtions : • Lot Address 132 43-205 Silk Tree Lane ux 133 43-235 „ „ 134 43-255 n / 135 74-420 Buttonwood Drive ✓ 136 74-410 " „ 137 -- 7 4-4 00 138 139 -- 74-380 „ „ ,✓ �►�.,�.. d/� 141 74-350 142 74-351 Santolina Drive :/ .. 143 74-361 It „ . 145 74-391 it " 146 74-401 It " ✓.. ,r' 147 74-411 " " ✓`/' 148 0 74-421 " " ✓ G Best regards , ) Bruce L. Wilcox EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 77-900 AVENUE OF THE STATES PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 PHONE: (714) 345-2626 FRANK R. GOODMAN,President Contractor's License No. 186863 R/CHARD OLIPHANT, Vice President uA Aated Congthuction Co., 9m. March 1, 1979 DECEIVED MiAP +; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Mr. Lloyd Morgan CITY RE P-AUA DESERT. Planning Technician City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane i Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Tract 8237, Palm Desert Dear Lloyd: The following is a list of houses in the Parkview subdivision which are ready for approval by the Planning Department prior to calling for final building inspections: LOT ADDRESS 149 43-150/Balsam Lane C1� 150 43-120 r 151 43-100. " J 152 43-042 153 43-041 154 43-081 tvq 155 43-101 it 'I 158 43-150 Buttonwood Drive r�r. Best Regards, Awl FA Bruce L. Wilcox BLW:hw EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 77-900 AVENUE OF THE STATES PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 PHONE: (714) 345-2626 FRANK R. GOODMAN, President Contractor's License No. 186863 RICHARD OLIPHANT, Vice President Con-0hudion, Co., Ale. April 23 , 1979 APR 2 ,� Mr. Lloyd Morgan ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Planning Technician CITY OF PALM DESERT City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert , California 92260 Re : Tract 8237 Dear Lloyd: The following is a list of houses in Phase III of the Parkview subdivision which are ready for approval by the Planning Depart- ment prior to final building inspections : Lot Address Lot Address 105 74-305 "Buttonwood Drive 114 74-395 Buttonwood Drive 106 74-315 " if 115 7 4-4 2 9 ✓ " if 107 74-325 " "_ 116 74-449,U/f 108 74-335,11;­:� rr rr 117 74-459 109 74-345 / " " 118 74-469 ✓j " " 110 74-355 / " r' 119 74-479m n 111 74-365 ✓ " " 121 43-240 railk Tree Lane 112 74-375 -// " " 122 43-210 113 74-385 ✓ " " 123 43-180 In addition to the above houses , we respectfully request that the City allow final building inspections to be made on the following houses not yet landscaped: Lot Address Lot Address 76 74-397 �rsine Avenue 91 74-366L.M rsine Avenue 81 74-473 � n n 96 74-276 84 74-474 ✓ 97 74-216 89 74-388 ✓ " 26 74-361 ✓" This request is made to facilitate early occupancy by homeowners who will otherwise be without housing. It is clearly understood that the landscaping of these homes will be completed on or before May 31 , 1979 , in accordance with the city .approved landscaping plan for each house plan . Best gards , EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 77-0 AVENUE OF THE STATES PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 . PHONE: (714) 345-2626 FRANK R. GOODMAN,President Contractor's License No. 186863 RICHARD OLIPHANT, Vice President DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE NO. 213-620-2700 l;; the niatter of the application of FINAL SUi"DIVISION PUBLIC REPORT USLIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, FILE NO. 39917 a California corporation ISSUED: DECEMBER. 21, 1977 AMENDED : JANUARY. .19, 1978 t�c,- ;: Fi::a1 Sabilivisio:: Public Rey ,irt on EXPIRES: DECEMBER 20, 1982 TRACT NO. 8237 "PARRVIEW HOMES" Riverside County, California � ThL Report Is Not a Recommendation or Endorsement of the Subdivision 'ut Is Infor.native Only. Bi:yer or L ssee Must Sign That He Has Received and Read T':is Report. 11 I'Lis Report Expires on Date SLo.1 ��n Abo:•e. If There has Been a INILterial Change in the Offer1:lg, an Amended Public Report Must Be Obtained and Used in Lieu of This Report. -Section 35700 of the California Health and Safety Code pr%-.vides that the practice of discrimination be.,ause of race, color, religion, sax, marital statLs, national origin or r:ncestry in housing accomrnoda-.ons is against public policy. Under Section 125.6 of the California Business and Professions Code, Califo,-nia real estate licensers are sub;act to disciplinary action by the Real Estate Comm;ssioner if they make any discrimination, distinction or restriction in negotiating a sala or lease of real property because of the race, color, sex, religion, ancestry or national origin of the prospective buyer. if any prospective buyer or lessee believes tnat a licensee is guilty of such conduce, he or she shouid contact the Department of Real Estate. Information Regarding Schools can be found on Page 3. READ THE ENTIRE REPORT on the following paves before contracting to purchase a lot in this SUBDIVISION. I /E Form 613 LOCATION AND SIZE: In the City of Palm Desert. Approximately 54 Acres divided into 172 Lots. EASEMENTS: Easements for utilities, polelines, sidewalks, street trees and other purposes are shown on the title report and the subdivision map recorded in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder, Book 92, page 3. USES AND ZONING: Properties adjacent to this subdivision are zoned as follows: PR-5: Planned Residential Development, Maximum Average Density of 5 dwelling units per ,gross acre. "P" : Public Institutional (schools, parks, public facilities, etc. ) . O.S. : Open Space (park and recreation uses, also used in this case as a stormwater drainage channel) . "S" : Study (to be re-zoned by the City in the future) . "N" .: Natural Factors (overlay zone requiring preservation of date groves to greatest extent feasible when developing property) . RESTRICTIONS: This subdivision is subject to restrictions recorded in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder on August 25, 1977 a Instrument No. 167323, and re-recorded on August 31, 1977 as Instrument No. 170934 . FOR INFORMATION AS TO YOUR OBLIGATIONS AND RIGHTS, YOU SHOULD READ THE RESTRICTIONS. THE SUBDIVIDER SHOULD MAKE THEM AVAILABLE TO YOU. TAX ESTIMATES: If the subdivider is unable to give you the current tax information, you may approximate your taxes as follows: TAKE 25% OF THE SALES PRICE, DIVIDE BY 100, AND .THEN MULTIPLY BY THE TOTAL TAX RATE. THE TAX RATE FOR THE 1977/78 FISCAL YEAR IS $10.478 . THE TAX RATE AND ASSESSED VALUATION MAY CHANGE IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS. FOR EXAMPLE, ANY BONDED DEBT OR SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSESSMENT APPROVED AFTER THE ABOVE TAX RATE HAD BEEN SET COULD INCREASE THE FUTURE RATE. CONDITIONS OF SALE: If your purchase involves financing, a form of deed of trust. and note will be used. These documents contain the following provisions: An acceleration clause. This means that if you sell the property, the lender may declare the entire unpaid loan balance immediately due and payable. Amended -2- of 3 r Scs FT E A'0. 7 A re a ent Penalty. This means that if you wish to pay off your loan in o�part before it is due, you may be required to pay an additional amount as a penalty in accordance with the terms of the loan. A late charge. This means that if you are late in making your monthly loan payment, you may have to pay an additional amount as a penalty. BEFORE SIGNING, YOU SHOULD READ AND THOROUGHLY UNDERSTAND ALL LOAN DOCUMENTS. PURCHASE MONEY HANDLING: The subdivider must impound all funds received from you in escrow depository until legal title is delivered to you. (Refer to Sections 11013 and 11013.2 (a) of the Business and Professions Code.) GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS: THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 70, PROVIDES FOR LOCAL BUILDING OFFICIALS TO EXERCISE PREVENTIVE MEASURES DURING GRADING TO ELIMINATE OR MINIMIZE DAMAGE FROM GEOLOGIC HAZARDS SUCH AS LANDSLIDES, FAULT MOVEMENTS, EARTHQUAKE SHARING, RAPID EROSION OR SUBSIDENCE. THIS SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED IN AN AREA WHERE SOME OF THESE HAZARDS MAY EXIST. SOME CALIFORNIA COUNTIES AND CITIES HAVE ADOPTED ORDINANCES THAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE AS EFFECTIVE IN THE CONTROL AND SITE PREPARATION. PURCHASERS SHOULD DISCUSS WITH THE DEVELOPER, THE DEVELOPER'S ENGINEER, THE ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST, AND THE LOCAL BUILDING OFFICIALS TO DETERMINE IF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED HAZARDS HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED AND IF THERE HAS BEEN ADEQUATE COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 70 OR AN EQUIVALENT OR MORE STRINGENT GRADING ORDINANCE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SUBDIVISION. SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Lot purchaser will be subject to sewerage service charge of $5.00per month. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: Regularly scheduled public transportation service is not available. SCHOOLS: The Desert Sands Unified School District advises that the location and distance from the most distant lot in the tract to the nearest schools serving this tract are as follows: Washington Elementary, (K-2) , 45-768 Portola, 1-3/4 miles; Lincoln Elementary, (3-5) , 74-100 Rutledge Way, 1/2 mile; Palm Desert Middle, (6-8) , 74-100 Rutledge Way, 3/8 mile; Indio High, (9-12) , 81-750 Avenue 46, 10-1/2 miles. School bus transportation is available and free to the aforementioned schools. NOTE: This school information was provided by the school district prior to issuance of the public report. Purchasers may contact the local school district offices for any changes in school assignments, facilities and bus service. For further information in regard to this subdivision, you may call (213) 620-2700, or examine the documents at the Department of Real Estate, 107 South Broadway, Room 7001, Los Angeles, California 90012. BJ -3- and last FILE NO. 39917 (AMENDED) uA Aated Congthuctiop Co., Ate. April 5, 1979 Palm Desert City Hall Planning Department 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane , Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Attn: Mr. Lloyd Morgan Re: Parkview Tract 8237 Palm Desert, Ca. Gentlemen: We respectively request that you allow the final building inspection to proceed on Lots 76 & 91 on the above referenced sub-division. At present time we have not installed fences, sprinklers or landscaping. However, we feel that these items should be installed by 5-1-79. This request is made in view of the hardships imposed upon the buyers at this present time. incer(\\e�l\y\, Richard R. Oliphant RRO:hw EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 77-900 AVENUE OF THE STATES PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 PHONE: (714)345-2626 FRANK R. GOODMAN,President Contractor's License No. 186863 RICHARD OLIPHANT, Vice President uAttiViated Conthuction Co., 9Pe- April 23, 1979 City of Palm Desert Planning Department 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Attn: Lloyd Morgan Re: Parkview Tract 8237 Lot 23 74-301 Myrsine Gentlemen: Please be advised that the above re: buyer will be putting in his own landscaping. Mr. Atwell ,will be submitting plans for your approval. Thank you. S n rely, Richard R. Oliphant RRO:hw APR � C `1979 ENVIROt MENTA1' DESERT S CITY OF PALM EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 77-900 AVENUE OF THE STATES PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 PHONE: (714) 345-2626 FRANK R. GOODMAN,President Contractor's License No. 186863 RICHARD OLIPHANT, Vice President DEPARTMENT 0i= I:EAL ESTATE OF T'1;1: S T ATE OP CALiFORNIA TELEPHONE 1`10, 2i3-620-2700 1 iiic iii:iller oftiit7 application cI l 1 L,FINA S'.;i3D1\'1':0.\1 PUBLIC REPORT USLIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION 5' FILE N-J. 39917 a California corporation ISSUED: DECE10ER 21, 1977 Subdiv;si•,;, Public Report on EXP;RES: DECE,MER 205 1982 Tract No. 237 i "PARKVIEW H f Riverside County, California fills Report Is Not a RccGim lendatio:i or End Orseille;?t of the Subdi%;S1va But Is Infori;;;aive Only. isujer or Lessee Prlust Sign "ihat Ite I-ins Received and Read This Repor:. I . . R^port 17Xpi1-es on Date Shown Above. if There Has Been a ,Material Change in the �f,criag, an u.icn<ieii Public RcI)ort Must i3e Obtained and Used in Lieu of This Report. S>ciion 35700 of the California Health and Safety Code provides that the practice of discriininatio:l b(., :USe of race, color, religion,Sex, marital status, national origin or anceSiry In housi',g accomnioda.:Di-s !s a(Gllnst pUl.,:.;; policy. U;!- er Sect,on 125.E of the California Business and r:o�essions Code, California real es:a:,! ilcerl5_r.:� 2:r-, to disciplinary action by ?he Real Estate Commissioner if they MaKe an'y dlscrimlria.!�-1n, C;Ss i, r_tiG;1 0:" ll negotiating a Sail or )ease of real properly because of the race, COIOr, S::?:, ?tio-n�,l origin of the prospective buyer. If any pr )spective bll'y'er or lessee believes OT such conduct, he Or she should con:act the Department of Real Estate. fill:)rulaiion Regarding Schools can be found on Page 4. ft,::`,D "-ICE ENTIRE REPORT on the following pages before contracting to purchiase lot "Ms SUBDIVISION. -l- H;': Form 618 . ,n:ic I LOCATION AND SIZE: In the City of Palm Desert. Approximately 54 Acres divided into 172 Lots. EASEMENTS: Easements for utilities, polelines , sidewalks, street trees and other purposes are shown on the title report and the subdivision map recorded in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder, Book 92, page 3. USES AND ZONING: Properties adjacent to this subdivision are zoned as fo1 ows: PR-5: Planned Residential Development, Maximum Average Density of 5 dwelling units per gross acre. "P" : Public Institutional (schools, parks, public facilities, etc. ) . O.S. : Open Space (park and recreation uses, also used in this case as a stormwater drainage channel) . • "S" : Study (to be re-zoned by the City in the future) . "N" : Natural Factors (overlay zone requiring preservation of date groves to greatest extent feasible when developing property) . RESTRICTIONS: This subdivision is subject to restrictions recorded in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder on August 25, 1977 as Instrument No. 167323, and re-recorded on August 31, 1977 as Instrument No. 170934 . FOR INFORMATION AS TO YOUR OBLIGATIONS AND RIGHTS, YOU SHOULD READ THE RESTRICTIONS. THE SUBDIVIDER SHOULD MAKE THEM AVAILABLE TO YOU. TAX ESTIMATES: If the subdivider is unable to give you the current tax information, you may approximate your taxes as follows: TAKE 25% OF THE SALES PRICE, DIVIDE BY 100 , AND THEN MULTIPLY BY THE TOTAL TAX RATE. THE TAX RATE FOR THE 1977/78 FISCAL YEAR IS $10.478 . THE TAX RATE AND' ASSESSED VALUATION MAY CHANGE IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS . FOR EXAMPLE, ANY BONDED DEBT OR SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSESSMENT APPROVED AFTER THE ABOVE TAX RATE HAD BEEN SET COULD INCREASE THE FUTURE RATE. CONDITIONS OF SALE: If your purchase involves financing, a form .of deed of trust and note will be used. These documents contain the following provisions: An acceleration clause. This means that if you sell the property, the lender may declare the entire unpaid loan balance immediately due and payable. -2- of 4 pa.ges FILE Pi0- 39917 Y A prepayment penalty. This means that if you wish to pay off your loan in whole or in part before it is due, you may be required to pay an additional amount as a penalty in accordance with the terms of the loan. A late charge. This means that if you are late in making your monthly loan payment, you may have to pay an additional amount as a penalty. BEFORE SIGNING, YOU SHOULD READ AND THOROUGHLY UNDERSTAND ALL LOAN DOCUMENTS . PURCHASE MONEY HANDLING: The subdivider must impound all funds received from you in escrow depository until legal title is delivered to you. (Refer to Sections 11013 and 11013.2 (a) of the Business and Professions Code. GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS: The developer's Engineering Geology Report as of November 15, 1977 indicates as follows: The site is located in the general area of two major tectonic features, the San Andreas fault zone 7 miles northeast, and the San Jacinto fault zone 17 miles southwest. Both of these northwest trending faults have been historically active in the area. Numerous earthquakes have occurred within a 16-mile radius of the site since 1934 . Most, if not all of these, have been associated with the San Andreas fault zone and have occurred north of the site along various branches of this fault. Probably the most significant historic earthquake in the area was the Richter magnitude 6.5 , Desert Hot Springs earthquake of December 4, 1948 . Earthquakes of magnitudes 6.0 and greater, commonly result in surface rupture along faults in California. However, no surface rupture along the Mission Creek or related faults was reported after the 1948 earthquake (Richter, 1958) . This earthquake epicenter was located approximately 15 miles northeast of the site. Based on the abundant evidence of activity along the San. Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones and the two large historic earthquakes along the San Andreas fault zone in the Coachella valley during historic times, the probability of a large earthquake occurring along the San Andreas fault zone within the area within the next 100 years seems quite high. No known faults or subsurface ground water barriers are known to exist on the site and no evidence of faulting was observed on the tract in the field or on the aerial photographs. Surface fault rupture through the tract is not expected. -3- of 4 pages FILE NO. 39917 Moderate to sever shaking of the site should be expected during the next 50 to 100 years from earthquakes in the general area. Earthquake induced flooding of the site is not likely as no large bodies of water exist above the site. Liquefaction and other shallow ground water related hazards were not expected as the depth to ground water is at least 100 feet below the surface. The surface materials are considered moderately susceptible to erosion by water and wind. Migrating sand dunes and dust storms are likely to occur during the life of the proposed structures. SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Lot purchaser' will be subject to sewerage service charge of $5.00 per month. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: Regularly scheduled public transportation service is not available. SCHOOLS: The Desert Sands Unified School District advises that the location and distance from the most distant lot in the tract to the nearest schools serving this tract are as follows: Washington Elementary (K-2) , 45-768 Portola, 1-3/4 miles; Lincoln Elementary,•-(3-.5) , 74-100 Rutledge Way, 1/2 mile; Palm Desert Middle, (6-8) , 74-100 Rutledge Way, 3/8 mile; Indio High, (9-12) , 81-750 Avenue 46, 10-1/2 miles . School bus transportation is available and free to the aforementioned schools. NOTE: This school information was provided by the school district prior to issuance of the public report. Purchasers may contact the local school district offices for any changes in school assignments, facilities and bus service. For further information in regard to this subdivision, you may call (213) 620-2700, or examine the documents at the Department of Real Estate, 107 South Broadway, Room 7001, Los Angeles, California 90012. BJ -4- and last FILE NO. 39,017 - RECEIVED BEFORE THE AUG 2 5 1977 DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT STATE OF CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE NO. (213) 620-2700 In the matter of the application of PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PUBLIC REPORT USLIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION a California corporation FILE NO. 39917 For a Pre mar ubdivision Public Report on ISSUED: APRIL 27, 1977 TRACT N 8237 "PARKVIE RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA EXPIRES: APRIL 26, 1978 This Report Is Not a Recommendation or Endorsement of the Subdivision But Is Informative Only. Buyer or Lessee Must Sign That He Has Received and Read This Report. This is a Preliminary Subdivision Public Report which permits the taking of reservations to purchase or lease a lot or parcel in this subdivision under the following conditions: (1) such reservations must be subject to the approval of the final public .report by the proposed purchaser; (2) any valuable consideration involved must be placed in a neutral escrow depository subject to withdrawal by the proposed purchaser at any time without deductions and an option to cancel his reservation at any time until he approves the final public report; and (3) a copy of the reservation agreement signed by the prospective purchaser and by the subdivider or his agent must be placed in the escrow. This Report Expires on Date Shown Above. If There Has Been a Material Change in the Offering, an Amended Public'Report Must Be Obtained and Used.in Lieu of This Report. Section 35700 of the California Health and Safety Code provides that the practice of discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, martial status, national origin or ancestry in housing accommodations is against public policy. Under Section 125.6 of the California Business and Professions Code, California real estate licensees are subject to disciplinary action by the Real Estate Commissioner if they make any discrimination,distinction or restriction in negotiating a sale or lease of real property because of the race, color, sex, religion, ancestry or national origin of the prospective buyer. If any prospective buyer or lessee believes that a licensee is guilty of Such conduct, he or she should contact the Department of Real Estate. INFORf4ATION REGARDING SCHOOLS CAN BE FOUND ON THE LAST PAGE OF THIS REPORT. The Filing of This Subdivision With the Department of Real Estate is Incomplete. Do Not Enter Into a Binding Contract to Purchase Until You Are Furnished a Final Subdivision ,Public Report. Read the Information on the Following Pages. R/E Form 620 10/76 SPECIAL NOTES THE FILING OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS INCOMPLETE IN THE FOLLOWING RESPECTS: Copies of the recorded map, title report issued subsequent to recordation of map, recorded Declaration of Restrictions, a report on geological conditions, and environmental impact report have not yet been submitted. THE AGREEMENT YOU WILL SIGN TO RESERVE A LOT IN THIS SUBDIVISION DOES NOT BIND THE SELLER TO SELL AT PRICES EFFECT OR QUOTED TO YOU AT THE TIME YOU ENTER INTO,A RESERVATION AGREEMENT. BY THE TIME THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PUBLIC REPORT IS ISSUED TO THE DEVELOPER THE ACTUAL PURCHASE PRICE MAY INCREASE ON SOME OR ALL THE LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION. LOCATION AND SIZE: In the City of Palm Desert. Approximately 54 acres divided into 172 lots. USES AND ZONING: Properties adjacent to this subdivision are zoned as follows: PR-5: Planned Residential Development, Maximum Average Density of 5 dwelling units per gross acre. "P": Public Institutional (schools, parks, public facilities, etc.). O.S. : Open Space (park and recreation uses, also used in this case as a stormwater drainage channel) . !IS": Study ( to be re-zoned by the City in the future. "N": Natural Factors (overlay zone requiring preservation of date groves to greatest extent feasible when developing property). RESTRICTIONS: This subdivision will be subject to restrictions to be recorded in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder. FOR INFORMATION AS TO YOUR OBLIGATIONS AND RIGHTS, YOU SHOULD READ THE RESTRICTIONS. THE SUBDIVIDER SHOULD MAKE THEM .AVAILABLE TO YOU. TAX ESTIMATES: If the subdivider is unable to give you the current tax information, you may approximate your taxes as follows: TAKE 25%, OF THE SALES PRICE, DIVIDE BY 100, AND THEN MULTIPLY BY THE TOTAL TAX RATE. THE TAX RATE FOR THE 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR IS $11 . 160. THE TAX RATE AND ASSESSED VALUATION MAY CHANGE IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS. FOR EXAMPLE, .ANY BONDED DEBT OR SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSESSMENT APPROVED AFTER THE ABOVE TAX RATE HAD BEEN SET COULD INCREASE THE FUTURE RATE. CONDITIONS OF SALE: If your purchase involves financing, a form of deed of trust and note will be used. These documents contain the following provisions: An acceleration clause. This means that if you sell the property, the lender may declare the entire unpaid loan balance immediately due and payable. -2- of 3 pages FILE NO. 39917 (Preliminary) A prepayment penalty. . This means that if you wish to pay off your loan in whole or in part before it is due, you may be required to pay an additional amount as a penalty in accordance with the terms of the loan. A late charge. This means that if you are late in making your monthly loan payment, you may have to pay an additional amount as a penalty. BEFORE SIGNING, YOU SHOULD READ AND THOROUGHLY UNDERSTAND ALL LOAN DOCUMENTS. RESERVATION MONEY HANDLING: If you reserve a lot, the subdivider must place all funds received from you in a neutral escrow at USLife Savings and Loan Association, 3855 Market Street, Riverside, California, subject to the conditions of the tentative reservation agreement. SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Lot purchaser will be subject to sewerage service charge of $5.00 per month. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: Regularly scheduled public transportation service is not avail- able. SCHOOLS: The Desert Sands Unified School District advises that the location and distance from the most distant lot in the tract to the nearest schools serving this tract are as follows: Washington Elementary (K-2) , 45-768 Portola, 1-3/4 miles; Lincoln Elementary,(3-5), 74-100 Rutledge Way, 1/2 mile; Palm Desert diddle (6-8), 74-100 Rutledge Way, 3/8 mile; Indio High (9-12), 81-750 Avenue 46, 10-1/2 miles. 0 School bus transportation is available and free to the aforementioned schools. NOTE: This school information was provided by the school district prior to issuance of the public report. Purchasers may contact the local school district offices for any changes in school assignments, facilities and bus service. For further information in regard to this subdivision, ,you may call (213) 620-2700, or examine the documents at the Department of Real Estate, 107 South Broadway, Room 8136, Los Angeles, California 90012. BJ/klm -3- and last FILE NO. 39917 (Preliminary) } V ' Commissioner Berkey moved and Commissioner Kelly seconded to set the Sign Ordinance for Public Hearing on November 16, 1976. The motion unanimously carried. B. Discussion of the Annual Report to the "Council on Inter-Government Relations" on Planning Activities. There was a short discussion pertaining -to the above report. Commissioner Mills moved to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 187, as corrected, (change in Resolution Number and change .in dates of Planning Commission meeting). Commissioner Van de Mark seconded the motion; motion unanimously carried. IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS None X. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None XI. COMMENTS A. City Staff Mr. Williams gave a report on .the last City Council meeting. His report included the Council 's decision on the Frank Goodman Tract (Tract 8237) , which passed with a 3-2 vote in favor of the Tract. Mr. Williams also informed the Commission that the City Council had approved Variance 03-76 (Al Kuri ) on a 4-1 vote. He explained that the .Council felt unique circumstances were involved and there- fore approved the Variance. t 4 B. City Attorney 1 7 F None �J r C. Planning Commissioners cn Chairman Wilson commented that he thought the annual city-wide bus trip was very beneficial in that it gave the people involved a chance to share their thoughts. XII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Van de Mark moved to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Mills seconded the motion and the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 pm. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY ATTEST: S. ROY WILSON, CHAIRMAN PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION October 19, 1976 1 Six d i • 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,.PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 October 21 , 1977 Mr. Frank Goodman Affiliated Construction 77-900 Avenue of the States Palm Desert, Ca. 92260. Subject: Items to be completed for r. 8237 prior to entering Plan Ch, ck Dear Frank: At the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of October 19, 1977 they did approve your concept of landscaping the lots of Tract 8237. The agreement is that you will install certain basic landscaping prior to occupancy at that time notify us of which of the ten alternatives has been selected by the owner or that the owner has elected to file his own landscape program. In addition, I have reviewed the proposed siting and elevation selection for the 70 lot initial phase. I do hereby approve this request subject to the attached conditions. There .are a few more details that need to be worked out before you will be ready to go into plan check. I thought that you might like some di- rection on the following items: 1 . Corner lot problem - the landscape plans that we have approved does not provide for corner lots. I would suggest that on the street side yard any rear yard fencing be held back 5-7 ft. from the pro- perty line and tall shrubs or trees be installed in this area. Further an additional tree and shrub along the building would help. 2. Wall treatment on Magnesia Falls and Deep Canyon I would suggest that some type of decorative masonry will be considered for these street frontages which would also wrap around the lots at the major entrance streets of the tract. 3. Rear yard fencing on other lots - I would suggest that the rear yard fencing be 1" by 8" vertical boards or better. 4. Side yard problem you have pointed out to me that you may have a problem with regards to two of the lots in terms of side yard set- backs. I would suggest that you file an adjustment request on said lots including more definitive plans. -2- 5. Driveways - I would suggest that you consider concrete driveways throughout the tract. I think that the above covers the remaining items that need to be completed. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. truly, Paul A. Williams, Director Dept. of Environmental Services PAW/ks cc: Case No. 48MF file #2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 48MF Siting and elevation selection for Lots 6-17, 98-104, 124-168, Tract 8237. 1 . Front yard setbacks shall vary from 20' to 24' , particularly on Rutledge Avenue and the two east-west streets. 2. All other setbacks shall conform to the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval , to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a permit or .allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmationhas been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature OOP—� ®�Q sSo 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 October 21 , 1977 Mr. Frank Goodman Affiliated Construction 77-900 Avenue of the States Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Subject: Items to be completed for Tr. 8237 prior to entering Plan Check Dear Frank: At the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of October 19, 1977 they did approve your concept of landscaping the lots of Tract 8237. The agreement is that you will install certain basic landscaping prior to occupancy at that time notify us of which of the ten alternatives has been selected by the owner or that the owner has elected to file his own landscape program. In addition, I have reviewed the proposed siting and elevation selection for the 70 lot initial phase. I do hereby approve this request subject to the attached conditions. There .are a few more details that need to be worked out before you will _ be ready to go into plan check. I thought that you might like some di- rection on the following items: 1 . Corner lot problem - the landscape plans that we have approved does tv not provide for corner lots. I would suggest that on the street side yard any rear yard fencing be held back 5-7 ft. from the pro— perty line and tall shrubs or trees be installed in this area. Further an additional tree and shrub' along the building would help. r 2. Wall treatment on Magnesia Falls and Deep Canyon I would suggest that some type of decorative masonry wall be considered for these street frontages which would also wrap around the lots at the major entrance streets of the tract. �! 0� 3. Rear yard fencing on other lots - I would suggest that the rear p�, yard fencing be 1" by 8" vertical boards or better. 4. Side yard problem - you have pointed out to me that you may have a problem with regards to two of the lots in terms of side yard set- backs. I would suggest that you file an adjustment request on said ��� " lots including more definitive plans. -2- 5. Driveways - I would suggest that you consider concrete driveways throughout the tract. I think that the above covers the remaining items that need to be completed. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. .o rs^trul�y,\� Paul A. Williams, Director Dept. of Environmental Services PAW/ks cc: Case No. 48MF file #2 BEFORE THE ° 1, DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE �- .6 _; OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE NO. (213) 620-2700 In the matter of the application of PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PUBLIC REPORT USLIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION a California corporation FILE NO. 39917 For a Preliminary Subdivision Public Report on ISSUED: APRIL 27, 1977 TRACT NO. 8237 "PARY.VIEW HOMES" RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA EXPIRES: APRIL 26, 1978 This Report Is Not a Recommendation or Endorsement of the Subdivision But Is Informative Only. Buyer or Lessee Must Sign That He Has Received and Read This Report. This is a Preliminary Subdivision Public Report which permits the taking of reservations to purchase or lease a lot or parcel in this subdivision under the following conditions: (1) such reservations must be subject to the approval of the final public report by the proposed purchaser; (2) any valuable consideration Involved must be placed in a neutral escrow depository subject to withdrawal by the proposed purchaser at any time without deductions and an option to cancel his reservation at any time until he approves the final public report; and (3) a copy of the reservation agreement signed by the prospective purchaser and by the subdivider or his agent must be placed in the escrow, This Report Expires on Date Shown Above. If There Has Been a Material Change in the Offering, an Amended Public Report Must Be Obtained and Used in Lieu of This Report. Section 35700 of the California Health and Safety Code provides that the practice of discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, martial, status, national origin or ancestry in housing accommodations is against public policy. Under Section 125.6 of the California Business and Professions Code, California real estate licensees are subject to disciplinary action by the Real Estate Commissioner if they make any discrimination,distinction or restriction in negotiating a sale or lease of real property because of the race, color, sex, religion,ancestry or national origin of the prospective buyer. If any prospective buyer or lessee believes that a licensee is guilty of such conduct, he or she should contact the Department of Real Estate. INFORMATION REGARDING SCHOOLS CAPl BE FOUtjp ON THE LAST PAGE OF THIS REPORT. The Filing of This Subdivision With the Department of Real Estate is Incomplete. Do Not Enter Into a Binding Contract to Purchase Until You Are Furnished a Final Subdivision Public Report. Read the Information on the Following Pages. R/E Farm 620 10/76 SPECIAL NOTES THE FILING OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS INCOMPLETE IN THE FOLLOWING RESPECTS: Copies of the recorded map, title report issued subsequent to recordation of map, recorded Declaration of Restrictions, a report on geological conditions, and environmental impact report have not yet been submitted. THE AGREEMENT YOU WILL SIGN TO RESERVE A LOT IN THIS SUBDIVISION DOES NOT BIND THE SELLER TO SELL AT PRICES EFFECT OR QUOTED TO YOU AT THE TIME YOU ENTER INTO A RESERVATION AGREEMENT. BY THE TIME THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PUBLIC REPORT IS ISSUED TO THE DEVELOPER THE ACTUAL PURCHASE PRICE MAY INCREASE ON SOME OR ALL THE LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION. LOCATION AND SIZE: In the City of Palm Desert. Approximately 54 acres divided into 172 lots. USES AND ZONING: Properties adjacent to this subdivision are zoned as follows: PR-5: Planned Residential Development, Maximum Average Density of 5 dwelling units per gross acre. "Pit: Public Institutional (schools, parks, public facilities, etc.) . O.S. : Open Space (park and recreation uses, also used in this case as a stormwater drainage channel) . Visit: Study ( to be re-zoned by the City in the future. "Nit: Natural Pactors (overlay zone requiring preservation of date groves to greatest extent feasible when developing property). RESTRICTIONS: This subdivision will be subject to restrictions to be recorded in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder. FOR INFORMATION AS TO YOUR OBLIGATIONS AND RIGHTS, YOU SHOULD READ THE RESTRICTIONS. THE SUBDIVIDER SHOULD MAKE THEM .AVAILABLE TO YOU. TAX ESTIMATES: If the subdivider is. unable to give you the current tax information, ,you may approximate your taxes as follows: TAKE 25° OF THE SALES PRICE, DIVIDE BY 100, .AND THEN MULTIPLY BY THE TOTAL TAX RATE. THE TAX RATE FOR THE 1976/77 FISCAL YEAR IS $11 .160. THE TAX RATE AND ASSESSED VALUATION MAY CHANGE IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS. FOR EXAMPLE, Ai,1Y BONDED DEBT OR SPECIAL DISTRICT ASSESSMENT APPROVED AFTER THE ABOVE TAX RATE HAD BEEN SET COULD INCREASE THE FUTURE RATE. CONDITIONS OF SALE: If your purchase involves financing, a form of deed of trust and note will be used. These documents contain the following provisions: An acceleration clause. This means that if you sell the property, the lender may declare the entire unpaid loan balance immediately due and payable. -2- of 3 pages FILE NO. 39917 (Preliminary) A prepayment penalty. This means that if you wish to pay off your loan in whole or in part before it is due, you may be required to pay an additional amount as a penalty in accordance with the terms of the loan. A late charge. This means that if you are late in making your monthly loan payment, you may have to pay an additional amount as a penalty. BEFORE SIGNING, YOU SHOULD READ AND THOROUGHLY UNDERSTAND ALL LOAN DOCUMENTS. RESERVATION MONEY HANDLING: If you reserve a lot, the subdivider must place all funds received fran you in a neutral escrow at USLife Savings and Loan Association, 3855 Market Street, Riverside, California, subject to the conditions of the tentative reservation agreement. SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Lot purchaser will be subject to sewerage service charge of $5.00 per month. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: Regularly scheduled public transportation service is not avail- able. ,SCHOOLS: The Desert Sands Unified School District advises that the location and distance-from the most distant lot in the tract to the nearest schools serving this tract are as follows: Washington Elementary (K-2), 45-768 Portola, 1-3/4, miles; Lincoln Elementary,(3-5), 74-100 Rutledge Way, 1/2 mile; Palm Desert Middle (6-8), 74-100 Rutledge Way, 3/8 mile; Indio High (9-12), 81-750 Avenue 46, 10-1/2 miles. School bus transportation is available and free to the aforementioned schools. NOTE: This school information was provided by the school district prior to issuance of the public report. Purchasers may contact the local school district offices for any changes in school assignments, facilities and bus service. For further information in regard to this subdivision, ,you may call (213) 620-2700, or . examine the documents at the Department of Real Estate, 107 South Broadway, Room 8136, Los Angeles, California 90012. BJ/klm -3- and last FILE NO. 39917 (Preliminary) ,1. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 . March 22, 1977 Safeco Title Insurance Company P. 0. BOX 111 Riverside, California 92501 Re: Tract 8237 Dear Ms. Riggs: The property of Tract 8237 is designated R-1-9,000. This zone permits one single-family residence .per lot, with a .minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet. Other uses permitted in the zone are listed on the attached copy of page 25. 10(1) of the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. . .Adjacent zon- ing provides for: PR-5: Planned Residential Development, Maximum Average Density of 5 Dwelling Units Per Gross Acre. "P": Public Institutional (schools, parks, public facilities, etc.). O.S. : Open Space (park and recreation uses, also used in this case as a stormwater drainage channel). . "S": Study (to be re-zoned by .the City in the future). . "N": Natural Factors (overlay zone requiring preservation of date groves to greatest extent feasible when developing property). The enclosed copy of Resolution 76-129 indicates that an EIR was filed for this case and certified as complete by the .City Council, in confor- mance to the requirements of CEQA. Continued.. ....... ../ Safeco Title Insurance Page Two March 22, 1977 The tentative subdivision map for TRACT 8237 was approved by the City Council on October 14, 1976. Evidence of said approval is provided by Resolution 76-126. ` The subject property is not subject to any Geological Hazard zoning. ery truly yours, PAUL A. WILLIAMS, DIRECTOR Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert,. California PAW/mj Attachments (as noted) a 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May - 31, 1977 To: All Interested Parties Subject: Approval of Street Names for Tract 8237. The attached names have been approved for use as street names within Tract 8237'. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please con- tact the Department of Environmental, Services. �� truly yours, Paul"-A. Williams, Director Dept. of Environmental Services. Attachment PAW/ks ,L'egerta� EX/ST/N6 Tract 8,23T urr of PAS vesERr STORE cy9NyE< I I II II � I i l----� A-sTJ"�----� j I � I I �1.JD• I ttI I —STA R FR1N ST• Z m � 2 ' QO� E Q (� a °C o,"4ai60L0 OR. lV Q --ter ViFN 60E - APPROVED NAMES Street "A" - Santolina Drive "B" - Buttonwood Drive "C" - Balsam Lane "D" - Silk Tree Lane "E" - Gazania Place "F" - Myrsine Avenue "G" - Palmilla Circle "H" - Vanda Circle SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION REPORT 110. 440115 Subdivision: Tract 8237 Dated: May 22, 1977 as of 7:30 A.M. For the benefit of the County of Riverside, any City within which the subdivision is located, the Subdivider and the Subdivider's Registered Civil Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor. A preliminary examination of those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to land included within the e*terior boundary shown on a inap of the above referenced subdivision received on May 24, 1977, by SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, herein called the the Company, discloses that, at the date hereof, the only parties having any record title interest in said land whose signatures are necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the map of said subdivision to be filed with the County Recorder of said County are set forth in Schedule A. This report is furnished as an accommodation, for the sole purpose of preliminary planning and facilitating the compliance with requirements necessary for the issuance of a Subdivision Guarantee. It is understood that the Company's liability is solely that expressed in such Guarantee, and that no liability separate from or other than the Company's liability under said Guarantee is assumed by this Report, except that if no Guarantee is issued under this Order the amount paid for this Report shall be the maximum liability of the Company. S TITLE INS C NY� Title Officer Norman Burdick gh Order M. 440115 SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION REPORT - SCHEDULE A Subdivision: Track 8237 Dated: May 22, 1977 as of 7:30 A.M. The map hereinbefore referred to is a proposed subdivision of: ,SEE EXHISIT "I" ATTACHED + The parties hereinbefore referred to are: FEE OWNERSt US Life Savings and loan Association, a California corporation, formerly Sterling Savings and Loan Association, a California corporation EASMMIT HOLDERS: County of Riverside, easement holder by deed recorded August 19, 1936 in book 292 page 223 of Official Records. Southern California Edison Company, a corporation, present holder of an easement granted to California Electric Power Company by deed recorded September 18, 1951 in book 1303 page 185 of official Records. Southern California Edison Company, a corporation, present holder of an easement gratned to California Electric Power Company by dead recorded March 19, 1961 in book 2865 page 332 of Official Records. order No. 440115 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION REPORT - SCREDUUE A CONTINUED County of Riverside, easement holder by deed recorded November 22, 1965 as Instrument No.. 132266. Southern California Edison Company, a corporation, easement holder by deed recorded January 7,' 1966 as Instrument No. 2517. Southern California Edison Company, a corporation, easement holder by deed recorded November 10, 1976 as Instrument No. 173140. lcc: Pacific Rim lcc: City Engineer - City of Palm Desert Order No. 440115 EXHXBIT "I" . PARCEL I- That portion of the north 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 16, '.township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the official plat thereof, described as follows Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot "A" as shown by map of Tract 2529 on file in Book 46 Pages 75 and 76 of Maps, Riverside County Records, being a point on the West line of said sections thence North 0" 16' 17" East, 142.58 feet on said West lines thence South 89° 57' East, 753.22 feet parallel with the Northerly line of said Tract 2529 to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly,. having a radius of 883.30 feet; thence Easterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 371 33' for an arc distance of 578.89 feet; thence North 52° 390 East, 348.34 feet; thence South 370 30' East, 142.50 feet; thence north 520 30' East, 201.69 feet. to the beginning of a curve concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 656.50 feet) thence' ItIortheasterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 370 38' 08" for an arc distance of 431.23 Teets thence South 890 51' S2" Bast, 268.66 :beets thence South 00° 08' 08" West, 156.50 feet; thence South 890 51' 52" East, 176 feet to a 1 point on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Sections thence South 000 080 32" West, 1985.45 feet on said East line to the Northeast corner of that certain parcel conveyed to the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, a corporation, by deed recorded September 17, 1957 as Instrument . No. 66770, said Northeast corner being the beginning of a reverse curve concave Southwesterly,'having a radius of 500 feats thence Vorthwesteriy on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 861 09' 56", for an arc distance of 751.94 feet, to. the beginning of a reverse curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 500 feet; thence Northwesterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 48. 51' 48", for an arc distance of 423.50 feet, thence North 37° 300 West, 335.76 feet; thence South 520 300 West, 304.34 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly, having a radius of 1029.20 feet, being the Northeasterly extension of the Northwesterly line of said Tract 2529; thence southwesterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 370 331, for an arc distance of 672.28 feet on the Northwesterly line of said Tract 2529, and its Northeasterly extension to an angle point thereon; thence North 890 57' West, 753.78 feet on the Northerly line of said tract to .the point of beginning. Except that portion described as follows; Order No. .. 440115 (EXHIBIT "I" - PARCEL I CONTINUED) Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said Sectiont thence North 0° 08' 08" East, 939.20 feet on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section, to the Northeast corner of that certain parcel described in deed to the Raman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, recorded September 17, 1957 as Instrument No. 66770, for the point of beginning; thence North 890 57' 35" West, 513 feet on the North line of said parcel and its Westerly extension; thence North 0° 02' 25" East, 509.47 feet; thence South 890 57' 35" East, 513 feet parallel with the North line of said parcel to a point on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Sectiont thence south 0. 08' 020,West, 509.47 feet on said East line to the point a of beginning. Also except that portion lying within Tract 8237-1, as shown by map recorded in Book 88 Page 67 of maps, Riverside County Records. PARCEL 2t That portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 16, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the official plat thereof, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 121 of Shadow Village Unit 2, as shown by map on file in Book 38 Pages 51_ and 52 of maps, Riverside County Records, said point being the true point of beginning; thence North 00 02' 25" East, a distance of 284.41 feet; thence South 89° 57' 35" East, a distance of 641.85 feet; thence South 0° 02' 25" West, a distance of 37.21 feet; thence South 89° 5 57' 35" Fast, a distance of 571.12 feet, more or less, to the Northeast corner of that certain parcel described in deed to the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, recorded September 17, 1957 as Instrument No. 66770, said corner being the beginning of a curve concave Southwesterly with a radius of 500 feet; thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 860 Q9' 56" for an arc length of 751.94 feet; thence Northerly along a tangent curve concave to the Northeast, described as having a central angle of 480 31' 48", a radius of 508.20 feet, and an arc length of 423.50 feet; thence North 37° 30' West, a distance of 335.76 feet; thence South 520 30' West, a distance of 304.34 feet; thence Southwesterly, along a tangent curve concave to the northwest, described as having a central angle of 20 27' 10", a radius of 1025.89 feet, an are length of 43.21 feet; thence South 350 02' S0" East, a distance of 200.50 feet; thence Westerly along a curve concave to the Northwest, described as having a central angle of 10 30' 30", a radius of 1226.30 feet and an arc length of 32.25 feet; thence South 330 32' 20" East, a distance of 112.50 feet; thence Westerly along a curve concave to the Northwest, Order No. 440115 (EXHIBIT "I" PARCEL 2 CONTINUED) described as having a central angle of 78° 40' 15" a radius of 1338.80 feet, and an are length of 669.90 feett thence South 37. 29' 69" East, a distance of 217.51 feett thence Northeasterly, along a curve concave to the Southeast, described as having a central angle of 50 240 20", a radius of 385.60 feet and an arc length of 30.38 feett thence South 440 471 50" East, a distance of 122.58 feet; thence South 4. 11' 40" West, a distance of 135.57 feet; thence Westerly along a curve concave to .the North described as having a central angle of J° 26' 30", a radius of 430.50 feet and an arc length of 63.43 feet; thence South 120 38' 10" West, a distance of 112.50 feet; thence Easterly along a curve concave to the North described as having a central angle of 1211 350 45" a radius Of 543.00 feet and an arc length of 119.37 feet; thence South 89° 57' 35" East, a distance of 306.28 feet to the true point of beginning. Except that portion described as follows% Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 121 of Shadow Village Unit No. 2 as shown by map on file in Book 38 Pages 51 and 52 of Maps, Riverside County Recordst thence North 0° 02' 25" East, 284.41 feet; thence South 890 57' 35" East, 641.85 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be describedf thence South 00 02' 25" West, 49.80 feet; thence South 89° 571 35" East, 33.27 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the West and having a radius of 410 feet, the radial line at the beginning of said curve bears Worth 81" 060 51" West; thence along the arc of said curve, through an angle of V 14' a distance of 37.45 feet; the radial line at the end of said curve beams South 86° 20' 51" East; thence North 89. 57' 35" West, 37.34 feet to. the true point of beginning. Also except that portion included within that portion described as follows: Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said Section; thence North 0' 08, 08" East, 939.20 feet on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section, to the Northeast corner of that certain parcel described in deed to the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, recorded September 17, 1957 as Instrument No. 66770 for the point of beginning; thence North 890 57' 35" West, 513 feet on the North line of said parcel and its Westerly extension; thence North 00 020 25" East, 509.47 feet; thence South 890 57' 35" East, 513 feet, parallel with the North line of said . parcel to a point on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Sections thence South 0' 08' 08" West, 509.47 feet on said Fast line to the point of beginning. Order No. 440115 (EXHIBIT "I" - PARCEL 2 CONTIHUED) Also except that portion included within that portion described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot "A" as shown by trap of Tract 2529 on file in Book 46 Pages 75 and 76 of Maps, Riverside County Records, being a point on the West line of said section; thence North 00 16' 17" East, 142.50 feet on said West line; thence South 890 570 East, 753.22 feet, parallel with the Northerly line of said Tract 2529 to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly, having a radius of 883.30 feet; thence Easterly on the arc of said curve 'through a central angle of 37°. 33' for an arc distance of 578.89 festj thence North 52. 30' East, 348.34 feet; thence South 37. 300 East, 142.50 feet] thence North 52. 30' East, 201.69 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 656.50 feet] thence Northeasterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 37° 38' 08" for an arc distance of 431.2.3 feet; thence South 896 51' 52" East, 268.66 feet; thence South 000 081 08" West, 156.50 feet; thence South 890 51e 52" East, 170 feet to a point on the East line of the southwest 1/4 of said section; thence South 000 081 06" West, 1088.45 feet on said West line to the Northeast corner of that certain parcel conveyed to the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, a corporation sale, by deed recorded September 17, 1957 as Instrument No. 66770, said northeast'corner being the beginning of a reverse curve concave Southwesterly, having a radius of 500 feet] thence Northwesterly on the arc of said curve through a ,central angle of 860 09' 56", for an arc distance of 751.94 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 500 feet; thence Northwesterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 480 31' 43" for an arc distance of 423.50 feet; thence North 37° 30' West, 333.76 feet; thence South 520 309 West, 504.34 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly, having a radius of 102S.80 feet, being the Northeasterly extension of the Northwesterly line of said Tract 2529; thence Southwesterly on the are of said curve through a central angle of 370 331, for an arc distance of 672.28 feet on the Northwesterly line of said Tract 2529, and its Northeasterly extension, to an angle point thereon; thence North 890 57' West, 753.78 feet on the Northerly line of said Tract to the point of beginning. PARCEL 3: That portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 26, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the official plat thereof, described as follows: r Order No. 440115 (EXHIBIT "I" - PARCEL 3 CONTINUED) Beginning at a point on the East line of thp southwest 1/4 of said Section, 2007.63 feet North of the South 1 4 corner thereof; thence North 896 51' 52" West, 170 feet; thence North 00. 080 08" East, 156.50 Peet; thence North 89` 51' 52" West, 268..66 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 656.50 feet; thence Southwesterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 37' 38' 08" for an arc distance of 431.23 feet; thence South 52. 30' West, 201.69 feet; thence North 370 20' West, 142.50 feet; thence South 520 30' West, 338.89 feet: thence North 00° 01' West, 838.75 feet to a point on the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of said section; thence North 89° 59' Fast, 1356.95 feet on said north line to the Northeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said section; thence south 006 08• 08" nest, 644.94 feet on the East line of the southwest 1/4 of said section to the point of beginning. Except the following described property: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 16; thence South 000 00' 52" East along the East line of said Northeat 1/4 101.90 feet; thence North 766 320 56" West, a distance of 429.48 feet to the worth line of said Northeast 1/4; thence North 89° 430 34" East along said North line a distance of 417.66 feet, to the point of beginning. PARCEL 4s Lots 1 to 5 inclusive, and Lot A of Tract 8237-1, per map recorded in book 88 page 67 of Maps, Riverside County Records. Said land is also situated in the City of Palm Desert. SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 3525 - 14TH STREET P. O. BOX 111 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502 (714) 684-1400 U. S. Life Savings and Loan 5220 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90036 Attentions Joe Nall Your Not Tract 8237 No: 440115 Dated as of May 22, 1977 at 7:30 a.m. r` In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, as of the date hereof, a , California Land Title Association Standard Coverage Form Policy of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein i hereinafter set forth in Schedule A, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception in Schedule B or not excluded from coverage Pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy form. This report (and any supplements or amendments thereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. Title Officer Norman Burdick gh i Order No. 440115 SCHEDULE A The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this schedule covered by this report is: a fee Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: USLIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a California oorporationi formerly STERL114G SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a California corporation The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of Cali- fornia, County of Riverside, and in described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "I" ATTACHED Order No. 440115 EXHIBIT "I" PARCEL Is That portion of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 16, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the official plat thereof, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot "A" as shown by map of Tract 2529 on file in Book 46 Pages 75 and 76 of baps, Riverside county Records, being a point on the West line of said Sections thence North 0. 16' 17" East, 142.58 feet on said West lines thence South 89° 57' East, 753.22 feet parallel with the Northerly line of said Tract 2529 to the beginning Of a curve concave Northwesterly, having a radius of 883.30 feet; thence Easterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 37" 33' for an arc distance of 578.89 feet$ thence North .520 39' East, 348.34 feet; thence South 370 304 East, 142.50 feet; thence North 52° 30' Lust, 201.69 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 656.50 feet; thence Northeasterly on the are of said curve through a central angle of 370 38' 08" for an .arc distance of 431.23 feet; thence South 890 51' 52" East, 268.66 feet; thence South 00° 08' 08" West, 156.50 feet; thence South 89. 51' 52" East, 170 feet to a point on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section; thence South 00. 08' 32" West, 1985.45 feet on said East line to the Northeast corner of that certain parcel conveyed to the Homan catholic Bishop of San Diego, a corporation, by deed recorded September 17, 1957 as Instrument No. 66770, said Northeast corner being the beginning of a reverse curve concave Southwesterly, having a radius of 500 feet; thence Northwesterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 86° 09' 56", for an are distance of 751.94 feet, to the beginning of a reverse curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 500 feet; thence Northwesterly on the are of said curve through a central angle of 480 51' 48", for an arc distance of 423.50 feet; thence North 37° 30' West, 335.76 feed thence South 520 30' West, 304.34 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly, having a radius of 1029.20 feet, being the Northeasterly extension of the 'Northwesterly line of said Tract 2529,; thence Southwesterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 370 331, for an arc distance of 672.28 feet on the Northwesterly line of said Tract 2529, and its Northeasterly extension to an angle point thereon; thence north 890 57' West, 753.78 feet on the Northerly line of said tract to the point of beginning. Except that portion described as follows: Order No. 440115 (EXHIBIT "I" - PARCEL 1 CONTINUED) Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said Sections thence North 0. 08' 08" East, 939.20 Peet on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section, to the Northeast corner of that certain parcel described in deed to the 'Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, recorded September 17, 1957 as instrument No. 66770, for the point of beginnings thence North 890 57' 35" West, 513 feet on the Taorth line of said parcel and its Westerly extension; thence North 00 02' 25" East, 509.47 feet; thence South 890 57' 35" East, 513 feet parallel with the North line of said parcel to a point on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section; thence South 00 084 02" West, 509.47 feet on said East line to the point of beginning. N Also except that portion lying within Tract 8237-1, as shown by map recorded in Book 88 Page 67 of Maps, Riverside County Records. PARCEL 2: That portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 16, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the official plat thereof, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 121 of Shadow Village Unit 2, as shown by map on file in Book 38 Pages 51 and 52 of Maps, Riverside County Records, raid point being the true point of beginning; thence North 00 02' 25" East, a distance of 284.41 feet; thence South 89. 57' 35" East, a distance of 641.85 feet; thence South 0" 02' 25" West, a distance of 37.21 feet; thence South 89. 5 57' 35" East, a distance of 571.12 feet, more or less, to the Northeast corner of that certain - parcel described in deed to the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, recorded September 17, 1957 as Instrument No. 66770, said corner being the beginning of a curve concave Southwesterly with a radius of 500 . feet; thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 860 09' 56" for an arc length of 751.94 feet; thence Northerly along a tangent curve ,concave to the Northeast, described as having a central angle of 480 31' 48", a radius of 508.20 feet, and an arc length of 423.50 feet; thence North 37° 30' West, a distance of 335.76 feet; thence South 52° 30' West, a distance of 304.34 feet; thence Southwesterly, along a tangent curve concave to the Northwest, described as,having a central angle of 20 27' 100, a radius of 1025.89 feet, an arc length of 43.21 feet; thence South 35. 02' 50" East, a distance of 200.50 feet; thence Westerly along a curve concave to the Northwest, described as having a central angle of 10 300 30", a radius of 1226.30 feet and an arc length of 32.25 feet; thence South 33° 32' 20" East, a distance of 112.50 feet; thence Westerly along a curve concave to the Northwest, P Order No. 440115 (ExHrBIT "I" - PARCEL 2 CONTINUER) described as having a central angle of 78" 40' 15" a radius of 1338.80 feet, and an arc length of 669.90 feet; thence South 37" 29' 69" East, a distance of 217.51 feet; thence Northeasterly, along a curve concave to the Southeast, described as having a central angle of 5° 24' 20", a radius of 385.60 feet and an are length of 30.38 feet; thence South 44" 471 50" East, a distance of 122.58 feet; thence South 4" 11' 40" West, a distance of 135.57 feet; thence Westerly along a curve concave to the North described as having a central angle of 3s 26' 30", a radius of L. - 430.50 feet and an arc length of 63.43 feet; thence South 12" 38' 10" West, a distance of 112.50 feet; thence Easterly along a curve concave to the North described as having a central angle of 12" 35' 45" a radius Of 543.00 feet and an arc length of 119.37 feet; thence South 890 57' 35" East, a distance of 306.28 feet to the true point of beginning. Except that portion described as followss Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 121 of Shadow Village Unit No. 2 as shown by map on file in Book 38 Pages 51 and 52 of Maps, Riverside County Records; thence North 00 02' 25" East, 284.41 feet; thence South 890 57' 35" East, 641.85 feet to the paint of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence South 0" 02' 25" West, 49.80 feet; thence South 89" 57' 35" East, 33.27 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the West and towing a radius of 410 feet, the radial line at the beginning of said curve bears North 810 061 51" West; thence along the arc of said curve, through an angle of 5° 14' a distance of 37.45 feet; the radial line at the end of said curve bears South 86" 20' S1" East; thence North 896 ,571 35" West, 37.34 feet to the true point of beginning. Also except that portion included within that portion described as follows Commencing at the South 1/4 corner of said Section; thence North 0" 08' Off" East, 939.20 feet on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section, to the Northeast earner of that certain parcel described in deed to the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, recorded September 17, 1957 as Instrument No. 66770 for the point of beginning; thence North 89" 57' 35" West, 513 feet on the North line of said parcel and its Westerly extension; thence north 0° 02' 25" East, 509.47 feet; thence South 89" 571 35" East, 513 feet, parallel with the North line of said parcel to a point on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section; thence South 00 08' 08" West, 509.47 feet on said East line to the point Of beginning. Order 1&b. 440115 - (EXHIBIT "I" PARCEL 2 CONTINUED) Also except that portion included within that portion described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot "A" as shown by map of Tract 2529 on file in Book 46 Pages 75 and 76 of gaps, Riverside County Records, being a point on the West line of said Section; thence north 0. 16' 17" East, 142.50 feet on said West line; thence South 89° 57' East, 753.22 feet, parallel with the Northerly line of said Tract 2529 to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly, having a radius of 883.30 feet; thence Easterly on the are of said curve through a central angle of 37. 33' for an arc distance of 578.89 feet) thence North 52° 30' East, 348.34 feet; thence South 370 300 East, 142.50 feet; thence North 52° 301 Fast, 201.69 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 656.50 feet) thence Northeasterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 37. 38' 08" for an are distance of 431.23 feet; thence South 89. 51' 52" East, 268.66 feet; thence South 00* 08" 08" West, 156.50 feet) thence South 891 510 S2" East, 170 feet to a point on the cast line of the Southwest 1/4 of said section; thence South 00" 081 08" West, 1088.45 feet on said West line to the Northeast corner of that certain parcel conveyed to the Roman Catholic Bishop of Ban Diego, a corporation sole, by deed recorded September 17, 1957 as Instrument No. 66770, said Northeast corner being the beginning of a reverse curve concave southwesterly, having a radius of 500 feet; thence Northwesterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 860 09' 56", for an arc distance of 751.94 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave Northeasterly, having a radius of 500 feet; thence Northwesterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 48° 31' 43" for an arc distance of 423.50 feet; thence North 37° 30' West, 333.76 feet; thence South 520 30' West, 504.34 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly, having a radius of 1025.80 feet, being the Northeasterly extension of the Northwesterly line of said Tract 2529; thence Southwesterly on the arc of said curve through a central angle of 37° 331, for an arc distance of 672.28 feet on the Northwesterly line of said Tract 2529, and its Northeasterly extension, to an angle point thereon; thence North 89° 571 West, 753.78 feet on the Northerly line of said Tract to the point of beginning. PARCEL 3 z That portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 16, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Meridian, according to the official plat thereof, described as follows: order No. 440115 (EXHIBIT "I" - PARCEL 3 CONTINUED) Beginning at a point on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section, 2007.63 feet North of the South 1/4 corner thereof= thence North 890 51' S2" West, 170 feet; thence North 000 080 08" East, 156.50 feet; thence North 890 51' 52" West, 268.66 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Southeasterly having a radius of 656.50 feet; thence Southwesterly on the are of said curve through a central angle of 37• 38' 08" for an arc distance of 431.23 feet; thence South 520 30' West, 201.69 feet; thence l;orth 370 20' West, 142.50 feet;' thence South 520 300 West, 338.89 feet; thence North 00° 01' West, 838.75 feet to a point on the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of said section; thence North 89° 594 East, 1356.95 feet on said North line to the,Northeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said section; thence South 00° 08' 08" West, 644.94 feet on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said section to the point of beginning. Except the following described property: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 16; thence South 004 000 52" East along the East.line of said Northeat 1/4 101.90 feet; thence North 76" 32' 56" West, a distance of 429.48 feet to the North line of said Northeast 1/4; thence North 890 43' 34" East along said North line a distance of 417.68 feet, to the point of beginning. PARCEL 4: Lots 1 to 5 inclusive, and Lot A of Tract 8237-1, per map recorded in book 88 page 67 of Mape, Riverside County Records. Said land is also situated in the City of Palm Desert. Order No. 440115 SCHEDULE 8 At the date hereof Exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions contained in said policy form would be as follows: 1.. Taxes for the fiscal year 1977-78, a lien not yet due or payable. 2. An easement for the hereinafter described purposes and rights incidental thereto as contained in an instrument recorded August 19, 1936 in book 292 page 223 of Official Recordst Fort public highway and public utility purposes In favor oft county of Riverside Affectst the west 30 feet of the southwest 1/4 of Parcel 1 . 3. An easement for the hereinafter described purposes and rights incidental thereto as contained in an instrument recorded September 18, 1951 as Instrument No. 39283s Fort utilities In favor of: California Electric Power Company Affects: An area of undisclosed width, the center line of which is described as follows: Beginning on the East line of the West 30 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of said section, at a point 1 foot South of the North line of said South- west 1/4 of Section 161 and running thence East, parallel to and 1 foot South of the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of Section 16, a distance of 2610 feet, more or less, to a point on the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section. (Affects Parcel 3) 4. An easement for the hereinafter described purposes and rights incidental thereto as contained in an instrument recorded March 10, 1961 as instrument No. 20949t Fors pole lanes In favor oft California Electric Power Company Affects: An area of undisclosed width, the center line of which is described as follows: CONTINUED Order No. 440115 (4. Continued) Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 105 of Shadow Village Unit No. 2 as shown by map on file in book 38 pages 51 and 52 of Haps, Riverside County Records# and running thence in a direct line, a distance of 120 feet, more or less to the Northeast corner of Iot 107 of said Shadow Village Unit 1,b. 2; thence in a direct line, a distance of 120 feet, more or less, to the most Northerly corner of Lot 109, said subdivisions thence in a direct line, a distance of 120 feet, more or less, to the most Northerly corner of Lot 111, said subdivisions thence in a direct line, a distance of 120 feet, more or less, to the most Northerly corner of Lot 113, said subdivisions thence in a direct line, a distance of 116 feet, more or less, to a point on the North line of Lot "C", said subdivision, said point being one foot northwest of the Northeast corner of said Lot "C", said point also being herein referred to as Point "A"s thence in a direct line, a distance of 131 feet, more or less, to the Northwest corner of Iot 116, said subdivisions thence in a direct line, a distance of 128 feet, more or less, to a point on the North line of Lot 118, which point is l foot East of the Northwest corner of said Lot 118 of said Shadow Village Unit Nb. 2. Also beginning at the above described Point "A" and running thence North 26. 25' East, a distance of 20 feet to a point in the above described portion of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 16. (Affects Parcel 2) 5. A Declaration of Dedication for public road, public utility and incidental purposes, recorded November 22, 1965 as instrument No. 132266. Affectas Parcel 1 6. An easement for the hereinafter described purposes and rights incidental thereto as contained in an instrument recorded November 22, 1965 as Instrument No. 132266; Fort public street, all public purposes In favor oft County of Riverside Affects: Parcel 1 7. An easement for the hereinafter described purposes and rights incidental thereto as contained in an instrument recorded January 7, 1966 as Instrument No. 2517# Fort pole lines In favor oft Southern California Edison Company, a corporation Affects: 4 strips of land, the center line being described as follows: CONTINUED Order No. 440115 (7. Continued) Beginning on the Southerly line of Lot 24 of Tract 2529 as shown by map on file in book 46 pages 75 and 76 of Maps, Riverside County Records, at a point 1.5 feet Westerly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 24; thence South 10" 00' 20" East, a distance of 20 feet, to a point in said Southwest 1/4 of section 16. Also beginning on the Southerly line of Lot 22 of said Tract 2529 at a point 1.5 feet westerly of the Southeast corner of said tot 22; thence South 189 35' 00" East, a distance of 20 feet to a point in said southwest 1/4 of Section 16. Also beginning on the Southeasterly line of Lot 20 of said Tract 2529, at a point 1..5 feet Southwesterly of the most Easterly corner .of said Lot 20; thence South 260 03' 40" East, a distance of 20 feet to a point in said Southwest 1/4 of Section 16. Also beginning on the Northeasterly line of Lot 18 of said Tract 2529, at a point 1.5 feet Southwesterly of the most Easterly corner of said Lot 18; thence North 560 27' 40" East, a distance of 20 feet to a point in said Southwest. 1/4 of Section 16. (Affects Parcel 2) 8. An easement for the hereinafter described purposes and rights incidental thereto as contained in an instrument recorded November 10, 1976 as Instrument No. 173140; For: underground electrical supply systems and communication systems In favor of: Southern California Edison Company. 9. An easement for public utility, sidewalk and street tree purposes and rights incidental thereto as shown on the recorded map of said tract. Affects: northerly 5 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 10. The dedication and acceptance of Lot A for street purposes as shown on Tract 8237-1, recorded in book 88 page 69 of Maps, Riverside County -_- Records. Order No. 440115 NOTE NO. is Information in possession of this Company indicates that a division of land, as defined in Government Code Section 66424, is contemplated in the current transaction involving the land described in this report. Such contemplated division of land would appear to fall within the purview of the Subdivision Map Act (commencing with Govern- ment Code Section 66410) and as a prerequisite to the issuance of final title evidence at least one of the following requirements must be ac- accomplished to this Company's satisfactions (1) That a final (Tract) map has been recorded in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and related ordinances; (2) That a Parcel Map has been recorded in compliance with the Subdi- vision Map Act and related ordinances; or (3) That a Certificate of Compliance as provided for in the Subdivision Map Act has been recorded; or that other satisfactory evidence indicat- ing compliance or nonviolation be furnished. lccs Pacific Rim lccs City Engineer - City of Palm Desert EIR FORM #7 CITY OF PALM DESERT NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Case No. Tract 8237 Applicant: AFFILIATED CONSTRUCTION CO. 77=900 Avenue of the States Palm Desert Ca. 92260 Description of Project: 54-acre single family residential subdivision E. I. R. City Council Action E. I. R. Required Yes XX No Date: July 7, 1976 If yes, Date: Draft E. I. R. Received July 25 1976 Submitted for Corrections Submitted to Consultant Draft E. I. R. Circulated July 26, 1976 - Aug. 26, 1976 Notice of Completion Sent to Secretary of Resources Agency July 26, 1976 Draft E. I. R. Considered by City Council October 14, 1976 City Council Action: Consideration of Draft E. I. R. Date: October 14, 1976 Action: Certified EIR as complete by City Council Final Action on Project: Date: October 14, 1976 Action: Tentative Tract map approved by Council Date Filed with County Clerk September 28, 1977 cc: File Applicant ✓ f J-4-c-i-. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Hunter ,Cook, City Engineer FROM: Paul Williams, Director of Environmental Services SUBJECT: Rutledge Way matter in relationship to DATE: May 4, 1977 Tract 8237-2 I am in receipt of the attached letter and drawing from Don Shayler, the engineer for Tract 8237 with regards to the parkway strip on Rutledge Way adjacent to the proposed expansion of the Palm Desert Community Park. I am agreeable to showing the 5' parkway either as an easement or as a part of the dedication and still counting it for park purposes , which- ever alternative you prefer please notify Mr. Shayler. I believe either alternative would conform to the intent of the Council in their action on the subject. If you have any additional questions regarding this matter please feel free to contact me. Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks MUTH MW EN YIRONMLNTAL ENGINEER/ COMMUNITY PLANNLRS.DLVLLOPMLNT ENGINEERS 73-893 HlcxwAx 111 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 (714) 346- 6165 April 29, 1971 Mr. Paul Williams, Planning Director City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1648 Palm Desert, Calif. 92260 Dear Mr. Williams: Re: Tract 8237-2 1101 0004 (7602) City Engineer Hunter Cook has agreed this week during your absence to consider the five foot "parkway" strip along the frontage of the park area to be considered as part of the required park area. He also wishes to have the normal road right of way shown on the final map, and requests written confirmation from your office that the inclusion of- the parkway strip as part of the required park area is acceptable to you. A preliminary sketch of the park site area - is enclosed for your reference, indicating pertinent right of way and curb lines. The required park area calculations are as follows: Project area 53.35 acres .(exclusive of existing road dedications) Required park area 2.67 acres (5% of project area) Park site area. 2.67 acres (project boundary on west, R/W Magnesia Falls Dr. on north, westerly curb line of Rutledge Ave on east and south) It is proposed to show the park site on the final subdivision map exclusive of the five foot wide "parkway" strip as requested by Mr. Cook. Please indicate in writing to Mr. Cook, with a copy to this office, your approval of the park area layout and calculations as described above. Sincerely, PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS D. H. Shayler DHS:jm Enclosure e 1 6rld. Core• py' 17' 5' v N Cvd Zoe 0 0 'o ' Z 0 o p 51rc 4APE,4 2, 2. 67 AC, 2.00 305.20o N 89 53 35��d , W1 � 6rld line. N• f2 JT LcD C..C- N DA7:a C ° R= 45o.voo •� p= 5Z 28 4(,. Curb 11ne 0� = 4 t2. 172 o N 1 = 22l.sk5 y o 0 om y 08 �yh� °=•e / s 'P, q. -5 1 0 �.06-•oa,c r� 1 83 o rj-7la 90 9c3�S So 3 / 8 Q- C, q 26.s�400.0 G'3 ro3 T. t 1oti R� •/ �^ _ f� L � II IN i �`--�_ tl �i Y� �t I �� r r 1 ti NOTICE OF ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PALM DESERT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RE: TRACT 8237 ACTION: XX Approved Denied Continued . Other REMARKS: Subject to conditions as attached. Roll Call resulted as follows: Ayes : McPherson, Seidler, Brush Noes: Mullins, Newbrander Absent: None I hereby certify that the foregoing is a. full, true and, correct copy of an order made and entered on Page of City Council Minutes Deputy Clerk of the CiV Council in and for the City of Palm Desert, State of California - CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 76-126 OCTOBER 14, 1976 --CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL .CAST NO. TRACT 8237 1. Full public improvements including paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, signing, sewer, water and drainage facilities, and necessary appur- tenances shall be installed as required by Ordinance, these conditions, and the City Engineer. 2. Drainage facilities satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be provided. These shall be sufficient to maintain at least one lane of traffic free of water on local streets in a one-year storm and two lanes for collectors. Water shall not be allowed to top the curb in a ten-year storm and shall --not be allowed to flood any building pads in a one-hundred year storm. 3. An additional easement for public utility, sidewalk, and street tree purposes .shall be provided on each side of the streets. 4. Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon- Road shall be constructed with full (32 foot travelway)" public improvements adjacent to the subdivision. A 20 foot minimum width connection, built and paved to City Standards, shall be provided between the subdivision and existing paved section of Deep Canyon Road to the south. Timing shall be subject to approval of the -City Engineer. . J5. Rutledge Way (Avenue) shall be improved as a half street (22 foot travelway) between Portola Avenue and the easterly edge of the school and full width (44 foot travelway) from that point to Magnesia Falls Drive. No sidewalks _will be required on the west side of Rutledge Way (Avenue) adjacent to the proposed park site. 6. Developer shall provide 5 foot wide P.C.C. sidewalks on both sides of all interior streets, as required by the City Engineer. 7.. The southerly right-of-way line of Magnesia Falls Drive shall be modified . as necessary to insure a minimum 10 foot parkway between the right-of-way _line and southerly curb line. A, 8. Access rights on all lots abutting Magnesia Falls Drive extended and Deep Canyon Road shall be offered to. the City as a dedication on the final map. 9. "The proposed street names are not approved. Prior to submittal of the final ..map, the applicant shall provide the City with a list of proposed street =names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street -names shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services. 10. All lots shall be a minimum of 9,000 square feet. Any modification of the proposed lot pattern that results from any condition attached by the City shall not be construed as a right to reduce the square footage of the lots ==to less than 9,000 square feet. 11 . In compliance with Article 26.15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, an -"area in the amount of 2.7 acres shall be provided westerly of Rutledge Way ( !(Avenue) as an offer for dedication to the City for neighborhood and com- I ) :_munity park facilities as a part of the approval of the final map. To accomplish this requirement, the lot pattern shall be revised to provide for the relocation of Rutledge Way (Avenue) subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. The section of Desert Star Boulevard between the existing improvements and "F" Street shall be constructed as a pedestrian and bicycle way. The -existing improvement shall be curbed as necessary to exclude throgh traffic r .-at this time. The unimproved portion of the right-of-way shall be land scaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. -1- RESOLUTION NO. 76-126 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, -CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FINDINGS AND APPROVING A TEN- -.TATIVE I4AP TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESI- DENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON 54 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED -WESTERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO DEEP CANYON ROAD, EXTENDED, IN -THE VICINITY OF THE PALM DESERT MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPLEX. CASE 1,10. TRACT 8237 i i ..WHEREAS, the City Council -of..the City,-of Palm .Desert, California, did --receive a verified-application .from U. .S. LIFE SAVI14GS & LOAN ASSOCIATION requesting approval of a single-family residential subdivision on 54 acres of land, located in _the _R-.1-.9,000.Zone and situated westerly of and adjacent to Deep Canyon Road, ex- tended, and more particularly:described as: SW 4, Section 16, T.5S, R.6E, SBB & M 'WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City _-of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution Number 74-14", in that z -Final Environmental Impact Report was filed and discussed at a duly noticed Public Hearing held by .the Palm Desert Planning Commission on August 31, 1976, i =and the City Council on October 14, 1976, -and has been certified by the City Coun- -cil as :complete; and, -WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did take into consideration the Tentative ,:--:Map as. submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies and recommended -- -�:approval .-to the City Council -subject to conditions; -and, 'WHEREAS, the City Council did find that -the subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with- the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State _of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended; and, ZTHEREAS, the City Council did -find -that the subject Tentative Map does comply with the City's adopted General Plan, i :NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the "City Council of the City of Palm I - Desert, California, as follows: 1. ° -that the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the LJ findings of the Council in this case; :2. that it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Map No.-8237, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. I :Resolution No. 76-126 :PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council , held on the 14th day of October, 1976, by the following vote, to wit: ( AYES: McPherson,* Seidler & Brush i _NOES: Mullins and Newbrander ABSENT: None .ABSTAIN: None NO J BRUSH, MAYOR ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, "ACTING CI_tY CLERK :CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA �i City Council Resolution ,o. 76-126 Conditions of Approval Tract No. 8237 October 14, 1976 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13. The lot pattern as shown is not approved; a revised lot pattern shall be sub- ..:mitted for approval by the City Engineer based upon the requirements of Con -dition No. 10 and the following: All corner lots shall have a minimum lot width of 80 feet and all interior -lots shall have a minimum lot width of 70 feet. On lots fronting on cul- de-sacs or knuckle streets, the minimum lot width at the street shall be feet. >14. The proposed connection of Erin Street shall be 32 feet of improvements . -within a 42 foot wide dedication plus the easement required under Condi- tion No. 3. 15. The remnant of property located easterly of Lot 16 is not approved. Said area .shall be incorporated into an adjacent lot. -16. Street lights of a design and location .acceptable to the City Engineer shall -be installed throughout the proposed subdivision as a part of the public -_improvements I have read and do agree to the -above listed conditions. -.., -Date Applicant's Signature i . l � — - RESOLUTION NO. 76-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF. PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH ITS FINDINGS AND APPROVING A TEN- TATIVE MAP TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESI- DENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON 54 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED WESTERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO DEEP CANYON ROAD, EXTENDED, IN THE VICINITY OF THE PALM DESERT MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPLEX. CASE NO. TRACT 8237 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did receive a verified application from U. S. LIFE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION requesting approval of a single-family residential subdivision on 54 acres of land, located in the R-1-9,000 Zone and situated westerly of and adjacent to Deep Canyon Road, ex- tended, and more particularly described as: SW 4f Section 16, T.5S, R.6E, SBB & M WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution Number 74-14", in that a Final Environmental Impact Report was filed and discussed at a duly noticed Public Hearing held by the Palm Desert Planning Commission on August 31, 1976, and the City Council on October 14, 1976, -and has been certified by the City Coun- cil as -complete; and, k WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did take into consideration the Tentative Map as. submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies and recommended approval .to the City Council subject to conditions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with the City of Palm Desert Municipal Code, and the State E of California Subdivision Map Act, as amended; and, ff� I WHEREAS, the City Council did find that the subject Tentative Map does comply with the City's adopted General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. that the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the --j findings of the Council in this case; .2. that it does hereby approve the above described Tentative Map No. 8237, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 76-126 OCTOBER 14, 1976 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CAST NO. TRACT 8237 1 . Full public improvements including paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, signing , sewer, water and drainage facilities, and necessary appur- tenances shall be installed as required by Ordinance, these conditions, and the City Engineer. 2. Drainage facilities satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be provided. These shall be sufficient to maintain at least one lane of traffic free of water on local streets in a one-year storm and two lanes for collectors. Water shall .not be 'allowed to top the curb in a ten-year storm and shall not be allowed to flood any building pads in a one-hundred year storm. 3. An additional easement for public utility, sidewalk, and street tree purposes shall be provided on each side of the streets. 4. Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon- Road shall be constructed with full (32 foot travelwayl public improvements adjacent to the subdivision. A 20 foot minimum width connection, built and paved to City Standards, shall be provided between the subdivision and existing paved section of Deep Canyon Road to the south. Timing shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. 5. Rutledge Way (Avenue) shall be improved as a half street (22 foot travelway) between Portola Avenue and the easterly edge of the school and full width (44 foot travelway) from that point to Magnesia Falls Drive. No sidewalks will be required on the west side of Rutledge Way (Avenue) adjacent to the i- proposed park site. 6. Developer shall provide 5 foot wide P.C.C. sidewalks on both sides of all interior streets, as required by the City Engineer. 7. The southerly right-of-way line of Magnesia Falls Drive shall be modified as necessary to insure a minimum 10 foot parkway between the right-of-way line and southerly curb line. 8. Access rights on all lots abutting Magnesia Falls Drive extended and Deep Canyon Road shall be offered to. the City as a dedication on the final map. 9. The proposed street names are not approved. Prior to submittal of the final map, the applicant shall provide the City with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street names shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services. 10. All lots shall be a minimum of 9,000 square feet. Any modification of the proposed lot pattern that results from any condition attached by the City shall not be construed as a right to reduce the square footage of the lots to less than 9,000 square feet. 11 . In compliance with Article 26.15 of the City's .Subdivision Ordinance, an area in the amount of 2.7 acres shall be provided westerly of Rutledge Way (Avenue) as an offer for dedication to the City for neighborhood and com- munity park facilities as a part of the approval of the final map. To accomplish this requirement, the lot pattern shall be revised to provide J for the relocation of Rutledge Way (Avenue) subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. The section of Desert Star Boulevard between the existing improvements and "F" Street shall be constructed as a pedestrian and bicycle way. The existing improvement shall be curbed as necessary to exclude throgh traffic at this time. The unimproved portion of the right-of-way shall be land- scaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • Resolution No. .76-126 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council , held on the 14th day of October, 1976, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: McPherson,' Seidler & Brush NOES: Mullins and Newbrander !� ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 7/11' BRUSH, MAYOR ATTEST: �f SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, "ACTING CIT. CLERK CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA City Council Resolution No. 76-126 Conditions of Approval Tract No. 8237 October 14, 1976 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13. The lot pattern as shown is not approved; a revised lot pattern shall be sub- mitted for approval by the City Engineer based upon the requirements of Con- dition No. 10 and the following: All corner lots shall have a minimum lot width of 80 feet and all interior lots shall have a minimum lot width of 70 feet. On lots fronting on cul- de-sacs or knuckle streets, the minimum lot width at the street shall be 35 feet. 14. The proposed connection of Erin Street shall be 32 feet of improvements . within a 42 foot wide dedication plus the easement required under Condi- tion No. 3. 15. The remnant of property located easterly of Lot 16 is not approved. Said area shall be incorporated into an adjacent lot. 16. Street lights of a design and 1ocation .acceptable to the City Engineer shall be installed throughout the proposed subdivision as a part of the public improvements i' I have read and do agree to the above listed conditions. Date Applicant's Signature CITY of PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Case No. : TRACT 8237 Applicant: U. S. LIFE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION I. REQUEST: That approval be granted for a single-family subdivision on property located easterly of Portola Avenue and northerly of 44th Avenue (see attached vicinity map). II. STAFF- RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council , by Resolution No. 76-126, approve the Tentative Map, subject to conditions. Justification for this approval is based upon the following facts: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision, as modified in the recommended conditions, will be consistent with the General Plan 3: The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. 5. The design of the subdivision, as amended by the recommended conditions and the proposed improvements, is not •likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially en- danger any wildlifec,�their habitat. 6. The design of the proposed subdivision and the related improve- ments are not likely to cause serious health problems. III. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: A. Planning Commission Resolution No. 178 B. Planning. Commission Minutes of August 31, 1976 C. Planning Commission Minutes of September 14, 1976 D. Planning Commission Minutes of October 5, 1976; amending the Minutes of the September 14, 1976 meeting E. Letter from Pacific Rim filed with application F. Letter from Desert Sands Unified School District G. Letters (12) from property owners in the area indicating certain concerns H. Recommended Resolution No. 76-126 I. Tract Map October 5, 1976 Page One I.V. BACKGROUND: A. Tract Size: 54 Acres B. Proposed Lots: 182 or less C. Zoning: R-1-9,000 D. Adjacent Zoning: North - S and OS South - R-1-9,000 East - PR-5,N and O.S.N West - P and S E. Environmental Finding: The staff has determined that this project is environmentally significant and an Environmental Impact Report has been developed and is scheduled for Public Hearing before the Council at the same meeting of the hearing for this project. F. Effect of the New Subdivision Ordinance: The owner of the property has .agreed, in writing, to conform to al `requirementsof the new Sub- division Ordinance. G. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission, at their regularly scheduled meeting of September 14, 1976, after a previous consideration at their meeting of August 31, 1976, did by Planning Commission Re- solution No. 178, recommend approval of this pro- ject to the City Council . V. DISCUSSION OF J SSUES: A. Introduction: During the two meetings at .which this item was discussed, a number of issues were wrestled with by the Planning Commission; some of which, depending on how they are decided, will set certain policies for future subdivisions. In order for the Council to fully understand the various issues regarding this project, staff proposes to discuss them individually. Further, the Council should also be aware that the project that was finally acted upon by the Commission is substantially a different project that was originally submitted. The metamorphic process this project went through was the result7of many long and tedious meetings between the applicant and the staff. Further, it was the result of a great deal of input received ,from the, residents on the adjacent subdivisions, particularly those resi- .dents along Desert Star Boulevard. .Where appropriate, the staff proposes to indicate to the Council the various alternatives available with regards to the various issues related to this project. Finally, the ramifications as to the appropriate conditions re- lative to each of these alternatives will also be expressed. B. Geographical Perspective: The 54 acres in question is a remnant of a total subdivision which was pro- cessed under the County's jurisdiction which included the total area between Deep Canyon Road and Portola Avenue north of 44th Avenue with the extension of Magnesia Falls Drive as the northerly boundary line for the Middle School/ (J Palm Desert Community Park area. Perhaps the biggest limiting factor in de- signing this subdivision is that fact that it is a remnant from an existing subdivision and it's shape was not as conducive to modern good subdivision design. Certain design elements inherent in the existing subdivision did not help the design capabilities of this remaining remnant. Further, the close proximity of a high activity use of the Palm Desert Middle School/Community Park complex had a specific impact on the ultimate design of the tract. October 5, 1976 Page Two V. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: B. Geographical Perspective: (continued) The basic concept of the overall tract design is to discourage through traffic within the subdivision and to encourage through traffic to utilize the exterior streets. Such a concept is contradictory to the previous philosophy of subdivision design as promoted by the County. As a result, given the existence of a subdivision designed under the County philosophy of "ultimate access throughout the total subdivision", the staff was con- strained in the design of the proposed tract. Finally, the fact that this property receive$ a large amount of drainage water from the existing sub- divisions had an important effect on the overall design of the subdivision. C. Street Dedication and Improvement Widths: The staff, in developing the proposed improvements within the public rights- of-way within a subdivision, is recommending a substantial deviation from the previous County requirements. This deviation deals with the following: In most instances, the staff is recommending that the dedication width be ten foot wider than the proposed width of improvements. In addition, a five foot easement for utility purposes and street tree purposes is requested. The map depicts a number on each street which describes the improvement width/dedication width plus the required five foot easement on each side of the street. The only exceptions to this requirement are Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road. These two roads are required to have 'a ten foot wide parkway area in order to provide for wider sidewalks for the dual purpose of bicycle/pedestrian walkway areas. Further, the wider sidewalk will provide for the street trees adjacent to the curb areas which will improve the aesthetics of the project along these two major roadways. The actual designs of the streets are as follows: 1. Rutledge Way (Avenue) - In front of the school property a half street width of 27 feet with 22 foot ofp mprovements. The area easterly of the school property would be 54 foot width with 44 foot of improvements. 2. Streets "A" "E" "F" the Extension of Primrose and "G" Street These streets would be 50 foot of road width with 40 foot of street improvements. 3. Streets "B "C", "H" and all other Cul-De-Sac Streets - These streets would be 46 foot road width with 36 foot of improvements. 4. Desert Star Boulevard - This street is proposed to be dedicated on the basis of 88 foot with only a portion of the area to be improved at 64 foot of improvements. The intent here is not to extend Desert Star into the subdivision until it is determined that it is necessary to make this connection. This is in response to a request by the property owners in the area to keep Desert Star Boulevard separated between the existing subdivision and the proposed subdivision. 5. Erin Street - 42 foot of dedication with 32 foot of improvements. This is to match existing pieces of Erin Street which were developed under the County. D. Required Off-Site Connections of Roadways: The staff and the Commission wrestled with whether a connection should be made between the proposed subdivision and the existing roadways, particularly with Deep Canyon Road. The Commission, at the recommendation of the staff, required that a connection be made between the existing portion of Deep Canyon Road to the south and the proposed subdivision on the basis of 20 foot of improvement width. This will provide for two travel lanes to con- nect with the proposed subdivision and the existing portion of Deep Canyon Road to the south. October 5, 1976 Page Three V. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: D. Required Off=Site Connections of Roadways: (continued) 1. alternatives: (a) Require the extension on the basis of a full width (fmprovements which would require a modification of Condition No. 4 to read as follows: 4. Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road shall be constructed with full (32 foot travelway) public improvements adjacent to the subdivision. A 32 foot minimum width connection, -built and paved to City Stan- dards, shall be provided between the subdivision and the existing paved section of Deep Canyon to the _so.utb� — Timing shall be .subject to the approval of the City Engineer. (b) Not require the connection of the subdivision to the existing portion of Deep Canyon Road to the south. In order to accom- plish this, Condition- No. 4 would be modified as follows: 4. Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road shall be com- structed with full (32 foot travelway) public improve- ments adjacent to the subdivision. The other off-site road extension which was not recommended by the staff or required by the Commission but which is certainly a consideration for the Council is the extension of Magnesia Falls Drive from the proposed subdivision to its presently easterly extension adjacent to the Palm Desert Community Park. The connection was not required by the Commission or .supported_Dby the staff on the basis of the fact that no evidence existed`tlia t -there was a need for this connection to improve the circu- lation or access to the subdivision since Deep Canyon extension would provide a most direct connection to 44th Avenue. If the Council choses to review this matter, the following alternative exists: 2. alternative: (a) To require the extension of Magnesia Falls Drive to be the re- sponsibility of the developer, Condition No. 4 would have to be modified as follows: 4. Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep. Canyon Road should be con- structed with full (32 foot travelway) public improvements adjacent to the subdivision. A 20 foot minimum width con- nection, built and paved to City Standards , shall be pro- vided between the subdivision and the existing paved sec- tion of Deep Canyon Road to the south and Magnesia Falls Drive to the west. Timing shall be subject to the appro- val of the City Engineer. E. . Park Dedication: Perhaps one of the most important issues discussed as par-t. of this sub- division by the Planning Commission was the matter of park dedication under Article 26. 15 of the City' s Subdivision Ordinance. , This Article provides that any new subdivision be required to provide 5% of the land area within the subdivision either in land or fees for park purposes to the City. The applicant in submitting his subdivision proposed to take the fee route and did not propose to give any land for park purposes to the City. The Commission in review of the map is recommending that the applicant be required to dedicate all the land westerly of Rutledge Way (Avenue) to comply with the provisions of Article 26.15 and that the difference between his requirement of 2.7 acres and the resulting dedi- cation which is approximately 1.954 acres be given in fees. If the Council elects not to go along with the applicant's request to accept an in-lieu fee versus land dedication, the applicant would prefer to limit the required land dedication to 1.954 acres which would be those lots shown westerly of Rutledge Way (Avenue) October 5, 1976 Page Four V. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: E. Park Dedication: (continued) This request is made by the applicant on the basis that he has already participated with the CVCWD in the installation of a water line :wthi'n the proposed right-of-way for Rutledge Way (Avenue) -adjacent to the proposed park site. If Rutledge Way (Avenue) were relocated further east., it may result in the requirement of further expense to him to move the water line and .related laterals. In checking with the Water District, the staff has determined that the water line does exist in the proposed Rutledge Way (Avenue) right-of-way, approximately 148.6 feet easterly of the existing park boundary. _ In order to increase the proposed addition to the Communit '_Park to `at lea t 2.Z acres,`proposed Rutledge Way (SAvenue) would have to`"6e relocated easterly approximately 60 feet. The result would be that the existing water line would be within the ultimate park area. Depending upon the ultimate development of the additional park area, the location of a water line in its boundary would only be a problem if a building were proposed for construction in the i-mmediate location of the water line and is therefore not really an issue in this matter. Further, the applicant requests that the difference between 2.7 acres and 1.954 acres not be required to be paid as in-lieu fees if he is required to improve Rutledge Way (Avenue) and .Magnesia Falls Drive, adjacent to the proposed park site. The Commission in review of this matter required the applicant to dedicate 1.954 acres and to pay the difference as in-lieu fees. The alternatives relative to this requirement are as follows: 3. alternatives: (a) If the Council elects to require the full 2.7 acres to be given in land, Condition No. 11 would have to be revised as follows: 11. In compliance with Article 26. 15.of the .City's Subdivision Ordinance, an area in the amount of 2.7 acres shall be pro- vided westerly of Rutledge Way (Avenue) as an offer for-dedi- cation to the City for neighborhood and community :park__ facilities as a part of the approval of the final "map. To accomplish this requirement, the lot pattern shall be revised to provide for the relocation of Rutledge Way (Avenue) sub- ject to the approval of the City Engineer. (b) Agree. with the applicant and require a .fee. To accomplish this, Condition No. 11 would have to be revised as follows: 11. In compliance with Article 26. 15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the applicant shall pay a fee in the amount equal to the value of 2.7 acres of the subdivision to the City for neighborhood and community park facilities as a part of the final map. F. Requirement for Sidewalks: The Commission wrestled with the requirement of sidewalks as a part of the improvements of this subdivision. Since no policy had been set by the Council , the Commission had to wrestle with the matter of sidewalks on its own. The decision made by .the Planning Commission was to require sidewalks throughout the subdivision. The applicant, in his presentation, indicated a desire to install sidewalks on the east side .of Rutledge Way (Avenue) and on both sides of "A" and "F" Streets. 4, alternatives: (a) Require sidewalks on both sides of all streets except for cul-de- sacs which would require modification of Condition No. 6 to read as follows: 6. Developer shall provide 5 foot wide P.C.C. sidewalks on both sides of all interior streets except for "C" and "H" Streets, and the cul-de-sac portion of "B" , "G", and "F" Streets, and the unnamed N/S street immediately west of Deep Canyon Road. (b). Not require sidewalks which will require the deletion of Condition No. 6. October 5. 1976 Pans FiVP V. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: F. Requirement for Sidewalks: ( 4. alternatives : (continued) (c) Require sidewalks only on the east side of Rutledge Way (Avenue) and "A" and "F" Streets which would require a modification of Condition No. 6 to read as follows: 6. Developer shall provide 5 foot wide P.C.C. sidewalks on both sides of "A" and "F" Streets and the east side of Rutledge Way (Avenue) , in a manner that is acceptable to the City Engineer. (d) Limit the requirement for sidewalks to Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road. This will require a modification to Condition No. 6 to read as follows: 6.. Developer shall provide 10 foot wide P.C.C. sidewalks on one side of Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. G. Street Lights: During the review of this project, the matter of street lights as a require- ment was discussed by the Planning Commission, Initially, .it was felt by the Commission that much like the ,sidewalk issue, for which there has been no policy established by the Council , they should require street lights throughout the project. After some discussion by the staff as to the rami- fications of such requirements throughout the community and the decision that must be made by the .Council before such a policy can be implemented, some thought was given-to. the requirement for street Yights at the inter- sections,"of Magnesia Fa11s rive an `Rutledge Way(Avenue) , Rutledge Way (Avenue) and"F"—&tre`et; Deep Canyon RoaVand Magnesia Falls Drive, Portola Avenue and Rutledge Way (Avenue) , and Deep Canyon Road and "E" Street. How- ever, the final approval by the Planning Commission did not require the developer to provide any street lights. 5. alternatives: (a) Require street lights at specified intersections. To accomplish this, a new Condition No. 16 should be added to read as follows: 16. The developer as part. of the public improvements within the subdivision shall install street lights of a design acceptable to the City Engineer at the following inter- sections: Rutledge Way (Avenue) and Portola Avenue, Rutledge Way (Avenue) and proposed "F" Street, Rutledge Way (Avenue) and Magnesia Falls Drive, Deep Canyon Road and Magnesia Falls Drive, Deep Canyon Road and proposed "E" Street. (b) Require street lights throughout the development at locations as specified by the City Engineer. To accomplish this, a new con- dition No. 16 would have to be added to the list of conditions of approval , to read as follows: 16. Street lights of a design and location acceptable to the City Engineer shall be. installed throughout the proposed subdivision as a part of the public improvements. October 5, 1976 Page' Six V. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: H. Improvement of Rutledge Way (Avenue) and .Magnesia Falls Drive Adjacent to the Proposed Park Site: One of the issues discussed in detail by the .Commission was whether or not the applicant should be responsible -for. the improvement of Rutledge Way (Avenue) and Magnesia Falls Drive adjacent to the required park site. The Commission, after a lengthy discussion, elected to require the applicant to install full width improvements in this vicinity. The applicant, in his presentation, contended that since the applicant was giving the land to the City, he should not be required to do the westerly half of Rutledge Way (Avenue) as a part of his improvements. The staff, in review of the matter with the City Attorney, felt that the two requirements were separate issues in terms of requiring park dedication and street improvements. The main issue relative to whether Rutledge Way (Avenue) should be improved to its full width in this vicinity is. its importance to circulation throughout the subdivision. The staff felt :it`Iais _mandatory that'Rutl=edge Way (Avenue) be installed at its full width on the basis that i't—does provide an important circulation link to and from portions of the subdivision.. This concept was concurred with by the Planning Commission. 6. alternatives: (a) Modify Condition No. 5 to specify the deletion of the require- ment of a sidewalk on the west side of Rutledge Way (Avenue). This would require the modification of Condition No. 5 to read as follows: 5. Rutledge Way (Avenue) shall be improved as .a half street (22 foot travelway) between Portola Avenue and the easterly edge of the school and full width (44 foot travelway) from that point to Magnesia Falls Drive. No sidewalks will be required on the west side of Rutledge Way (Avenue) adjacent to the proposed park site. (b) Agree with the applicant and not require the improvement of the westerly half of Rutledge Way (Avenue) adjacent to the proposed park site. This would require the modification of Condition No. 5 to read as follows: 5. Rutledge Way (Avenue) shall be improved,as a half street (22 foot travelway) between Portola Avenue and Magnesia Falls Drive. In addition, the developer will not be re-quired to improve Magnesia Falls Drive easterly of the ultimate western boundary of Rutl..edge Way (Avenue). I. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES: Because the various issues with the proposed development are complex and the alternatives numerous, the staff thought it appropriate to summarize the alternatives so that they will be useful to the Council . Further, the alternatives are presented in the following chart in order of preference by staff from left to right. If the Council chooses not to follow the Plan- ning Commission's recommendation with regard to any of the issues, the Coun- cil may simply select the appropriate alternative as a part of any motion of approval on the project. For example, if the Council . were to agree=;with,a11' conditions recommended by the Planning Commission; except that they felt the Park site should be increased to 2.7 acres, street lights, should be installed at certain intersections, and Deep Canyon Road should be extended at full street width improvements, the motion would be to approve City Council Reso- lution No.. 76-126, with alternatives 1(A,), 3(,A',) and 5(k) . . Finally, the proposed chart provides flexibility to add other issues or alternatives which may come up during the Public Hearing. October 5, 1976 Page Seven Page Eight POSSIDLE ALTERNATIVE CONDITIONS REGARDING TRACT NO. 8237 ISSUE STAFF PREFERENCE OTHER ALTERNATIVE CONDITIONS r B t C f 1. Extension of Deep Canyon Rd. -4 Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon 4. Magnesia Falls Drive (Condition No. 4) Road shall be constructed with full and Deep Canyon Road (32 foot travelway) public improve- shall be constructed ments adjacent to the subdivision. with full (32 foot A 32 foot minimum width connection, travelway) public built and paved to City Standards, improvements adja- shall be provided between the sub- cent to the subdi- division and the existing paved sec- vision. tion of Deep Canyon .to the south. Timing shall be subject to the ap- proval of the City. Engineer. 2. Extension of Magnesia Falls 4. . Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Can- Drive (Condition No. 4) you Road should be constructed with full (32 foot travelway) public im- provements adjacent to the subdi- vision. . A 20 foot minimum width connection, built and paved to City Standards, shall be pro- vided between the subdivision and the existing paved section of Deep Canyon Road to the south and Magnesia Falls Drive to the west. Timing shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 3. Park Dedication (Con- 11. In compliance with Article 26. 15 of 11. In compliance with Article dition No. 11) the City's Subdivision Ordinance, 26.15 of the City's Subdi- an area in the amount of 2.7 acres vision Ordinance, the appli- shall be provided westerly of Rut- cant shall pay a fee in the ledge Way (Avenue) as an offer for amount equal to the value of dedication to the City for neigh- 2.7 acres of the subdivision boyhood and community park facili- to the City for neighborhood ties as a part of the approval of and community park facilities the final map. To accomplish this as a part of the final map.. requirement, the lot pattern shall be revised to provide for the re- location of Rutledge Way (Avenue) subject to the approval of the City Engineer. POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE CONDITIONS REGARDING TRACT NO. 8237 Page Nine ISSUE STAFF PREFERENCE H R ALTERNATIVE CONDITIONS A B C 4. Sidewalks (Condition No. 6) 6. .,DevelVopei�:shall provide 5 foot Not require sidewalks which 6. Developer shall provide 5 foot 6. Developer shall provide wide P.C.C. sidewalks nono both will require the deletion of wide P.C.C. sidewalks on both 10 foot wide P.C.C. sides of all interior streets Condition No. 6 sides of "A" and "F" Streets sidewalks on one side except for "C" and "H" Streets, and the east side of Rutledge of Magnesia Falls Drive and the cul-de-sac portion of Way (Avenue) , in a manner ac- and Deep Canyon Road in "B" , "G", and "F" Streets, and ' ceptable to the City Engineer. a manner acceptable to the unnamed N/S street immediate- the City Engineer. ly west of Deep Canyon Road. 5. Street Lights (New Condi- 16. The developer as part of the pub 16. Street lights of a design tion No. 16) lic improvements within the sub- and .location acceptable to division shall install street the City Engineer shall be lights of a design acceptable installed throughout the to the City Engineer-at the fol- proposed subdivision as a lowing intersections: part of the public improve- ments. :Rutledge Way(Av_e!) I Portola Ave, Rutledge -Way(Ave. ) & proposed "F" Street, 'Rut•ledge Way(Ave. ) & Magnesia Falls rive, Deep Canyon Rd. &.Magnesia Falls Dr. Deep Canyon Rd. & proposed "E" St. 6. Improvement of .Rutledge Way 5. Rutledge Way (Avenue) shall be 5. Rutledge Way (Avenue) shall (Avenue) and Magnesi.a Falls improved as a half street (22 be improved as a half street Drive adjacent to proposed foot travelway) between Portola (22 foot travelway) between Park site (Condition No. 5) Avenue and the easterly ed e of Portola Avenue and Magnesia the school. and full width �44 Falls Drive. In addition, foot travelway) from that point the developer will not be to Magnesia Falls Drive. No required to improve Magne- sidewalks will be required on the sia Falls Drive easterly of west side of Rutledge Way (Ave- the ultimate western boun- nue) adjacent to the proposed dary of Rutledge Way (Ave- park site. nue). VI . BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: A. Completion of the Circulation System in the Area B. Provides a Potential for Reasonably,' Priced Housing C. Resolves an Existing Drainage Problem D. Provides Alternative, Safe, and Direct Access to the Middle School/Community Park Complex E. Increases the Existing Park Area VII. DRAWBACKS OF THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: A. The existence of the formal total subdivision has resulted in major com- promises in the area of circulation and access which could have been solved except for the existing configuration. For example, increased use of Rutledge Way (Avenue) for access to the proposed subdivision which may cause severe conflicts adjacent to the Middle School Complex which cannot be mitigated except by additional widening. The present subdivision de- signed is considered to be the best possible under this limitation. B. Increase service costs for the .City such as road maintenance, police and fire services, etc. These costs are somewhat offset by increased income to the City from the resulting residents in terms of state subventions in the amount of approximately $21 per person and sales tax generated. VIII. FUTURE REVIEW: The real success of this potential development will be determined by the design, size, and types of improvements related to the proposed houses to be constructed on the lots being developed within the subdivision. Con- cerns such as building size, variety of design of the units, treatment along Magnesia Falls Drive, Deep Canyon Road, and Rutledge Way (Avenue) will determine the successful integration of this project into the commu- nity. In addition, the amount of landscaping and fencing will determine the success of the overall appearance of the total subdivision. If the normal City Standards of complete landscaping of the front yard areas and complete fencing of the rear yard areas are supplemented by more substantial improvements alone the three major roadways, staff believes that the appear- ance of the project will be successful . Further, if the unit sizes are com- patible with the lot size and .the interior design creates a comfortable en- vironment for the ultimate occupants, the staff believes .the project will be a benefit to the Community.. These factors will be determined during the Design Review Board process. -October 5, 1976 Page Ten v ATTACHMENTS TO STAFF REPORT TRACT NO. 8237 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 178 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, S[ TTING FORTH I1-S FINDINGS AND RECOMMEND- ING TO THE CITY COUNCIL, APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A 182-LOT SUBDIVISION ON 54 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED WESTERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO DEEP CANYON ROAD EXTENDED IN THE VICINITY OF THE PALM DESERT MIDDLE SCHOOL COM- PLEX. CASE NO. TRACT 8237 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, of the City of Palm Desert, did receive a verified application from U. S. LIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN requesting approval of a 182-lot single-family subdivision on 54 acres of land, located in the R-1-9,000 zone and situated westerly of and adjacent to Deep Canyon Road extended, and more particularly described as : SW 4, Section 16, T.5S. , R.6.E. ,-SBB & M WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution Number 74-14", in that a final Environmental Impact Report was filed and discussed at a duly noticed Public Hearing held by the Planning Commission on August 31, 1976, and has been recommended to the City Council . for certification; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did take into consideration the Tentative Map as submitted, and the reports of the various reviewing agencies; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tentative Map does substantially comply with the City of Palm Desert Code, and the State of California Subdivision. Map Act, as amended; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did find that the subject Tentative Map does comply with the adopted General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows: 1) that the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2) that it does hereby recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Palm Desert of the above described Tentative Map No. 8237, subject to fulfillment of the attached conditions. -1-` Resolution No. 178 FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommended Conditions of Approval i do include a requirement that the applicant dedicate the lots west of Rutledge Way (Avenue) to comply to the requirements of Article 26.15 of the City f I of Palm Desert Subdivision Ordinance and that the remainder of the 2.7 acres be a? given in fee.. R- PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1976, by the following vote, to tit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, MILLS, WILSON NOES: VAN DE MARK I ABSENT: NONE j ABSTAIN: NONE S. ROY WILSON, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert, Calfiornia I 1 I I i t i >ev . T y -2- Planning Commission Resolution No. 178 September 14, 1976 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL f f TRACT 8237 k k 1 . Full public improvements including paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, signing, sewer, water and drainage facilities and necessary appur- tenances shall be installed as required by ordinance, these conditions, and the City Engineer. 2. Drainage facilities satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be provided. �t These shall be sufficient to maintain at least one lane of traffic free of water on local streets in a one year storm and two 'lanes for collectors. Water shall not be allowed to top the curb in a 10 year storm and shall I not be allowed to flood any building pads in a 100 year storm. 3. An additional easement for public utility, sidewalk and street tree purposes shall be provided on each side of the streets. 4. Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road shall be constructed with full E (32.' travel way) public improvements adjacent to the Subdivision. A 20' minimum width connection, built and paved to City Standards, shall be provided between the subdivision and the existing paved section of Deep f Canyon to the south. Timing shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. } 5. Rutledge Way shall be improved as a half street (22' travel way) between Portola Avenue and the easterly edge of the school and full width (44' travel way) from that point to Magnesia Falls Drive. 6. Developer shall provide 5' wide P.C.C. sidewalks on both sides .of all interior streets, as required by the City Engineer. j. i i 7. The southerly right-of-way line of Magnesia Falls Drive shall be modified as necessary to insure a minimum 10' parkway between the right-of-way line F and southerly curb line. f f 8. Access rights on all lots abutting Magnesia Falls Drive extended and Deep Canyon shall be offered to the City as a dedication on the final map. 9. The proposed street names are not approved. Prior to submittal of the final map, the applicant shall provide the City with a list of proposed f; street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street names shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services. 10. All lots shall be a minimum of 9,000 square feet. Any modification of the proposed lot pattern that results from any condition attached by the City shall not be construed as a right to reduce the square footage of the lots to less than 9,000 square feet. 11 . In partial compliance with Article 26.15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, lots shown westerly of Rutledge Way shall be offered for dedication to the City for neighborhood and community public facilities as a part of the approval of the final map. Tlie remainder of the public facilities requirement shall be met by the paying of a fee in an amount determined under the provisions of Article 26.15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 12. The section of Desert Star Blvd. between the existing improvements and "F" Street shall be constructed as a pedestrian and bicycle way. The f ' existing improvement shall be curbed as necessary to exclude through �[ traffic at this time. The unimproved portion of the right-of-way shall be landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. I k _1_ i rig r ' PLANNING COIMMISSJON RESOLUTION 110. 178 i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TRACT NO. 8237 j SEPTEMBER 1.4, 1976 j 13. The lot pattern as shown is not approved, a revised lot pattern shall be submitted for 'approval by the City Engineer based upon the requirements of Condition No. 10 and the following: All corner lots shall have a minimum Tot width of 80 feet and all interior lots shall have a minimum lot width of 70 feet. On lots fronting on cul-de-sacs or knuckle streets, the minimum lot width at the street shall be 35 feet. 14. The proposed connection of Erin Street shall be 32 feet of improvements within a 42 foot wide dedication plus the easement required under Condition No. 3. 15. The remnant of property located easterly of Lot 16 is not approved. Said area shall be incorporated into an adjacent lot. I have read and do agree to the above listed condition;. '�i pate ----Applicait' s Signature V� -2- •n-.:.oar,.it.-q9�-.+.e-..,.-;9+...-zmF-+v.. ,a.......rr-....;+.., ...-;pus!^-a-,•�rw',h'�i.'r::"T`"ego..r..v-y.-.-r,+..-.*�atw*..._, ...,....-...•,- �...�.-'-'--...�,...,p,.sw..-,...,++.r.n.efew.r..to+�x?r"..«»e....a.+�+.re.-......n...:+o� h'rINUTES j PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 31., 1976 j i B. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR TRACT 8237 - U. S. LIFE SAVINGS I Consideration of a final Environmental Impact Report for a 185-unit residential subdivision on 54.5 acres of land located east of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater River Storm Channel , and west of Deep Canyon Road. Mr. Williams reviewed the staff report with the Commission. The staff report included comments from the various agencies and organizations that received copies of the EIR. Mr. Williams also presented a late response which was ' received from the Southern California Air Pollution Control District regarding auto emission calculations. In summary, Mr. Williams stated that staff felt that the information provided in the EIR was complete and recommended that the Planning Commission recommend the EIR to the City Council for approval and certification. Chairman Wilson asked if the applicant was present. FRANK GOODMAN, 73-655 Shadow Mountain Drive, spoke to the Commission and stated that he believed the report stood as recommended by the Planning staff. Chairman Wilson asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak in favor of the completeness of the EIR. Being no one, he then asked if there was any- one who wished to speak against the certification of the EIR. RICHARD KITE, 48-643 Stoney Creek, had a question regarding the number of children that had been projected in the report as being of school age. Mr. Williams clarified the report for Mr. Kite and stated that Ill school age children were projected for the area; .but that the total number of children, under the age of 18, would be 218. Being no other comments, Chairman Wilson closed the Public Hearing. i Commissioner Berkey moved and Commissioner Mills seconded the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 171, as corrected, recommending certifica- tion of the EIR .to the City Council . Motion unanimously carried. C. CASE NO. TRACT 8237 - U. S. LIFE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION I Consideration of a Tentative Map for a 185-unit residential subdivision on 54.5 acres of land located east of Portola Avenue, south of the White- water River Storm Channel , and west of Deep Canyon Road (R-1-9,000) . Mr. Williams presented the staff report to the Commission. Said report in- f cluded a background of the project and numerous discussion issues as follows: Neighborhood and Community Park Facilities � Street Width and Improvement Designs Proposed Types of Improvements Required on the Streets Bonding for the Improvement of Magnesia Falls and Deep Canyon Modification of Florine Avenue Limiting Connections to Deep Canyon Drainage Street Lights I Undergrounding Mr. Williams stated that a great deal of discussion had gone into the design II of the tract. He further stated that the issues under discussion were in some part caused by a transition that was occurring among the staff in terms of con- j verting from utilization of the engineering services of the County to the recom- mendations of the City Engineer, who recently had been appointed to the City staff. f f -3- i • e M;NUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 31, 1976 The three main issues according to staff are road design, undergrounding, and i drainage. Mr. Williams recommended that the drainage issue be reviewed by the City Engineer before the Tentative "Map goes to the City Council . Mr. Williams further stated that staff felt the sidewalks were essential throughout the sub- division. Chairman Wilson asked if the applicant was present. FRANK GOODMAN, 73-655 Shadow Mountain Drive, spoke to the Commission and pre- sented MR. DON SHAYLER, Engineer for the project, who would be available to answer any technical questions that the Commission might have. Mr. Goodman stated that the primary problem,was the drainage problem and that the prime consideration of the entire tract relative to the street layout was to move the water to the Channel . Mr. Goodman stated the first issue he would like to discuss with the Commission was the issue of sidewalks. He presented a map showing the proposed locations for sidewalks within the subdivision. He stated that the developer only wanted. to install the necessary sidewalks in order to get the people across the subdivision. He commented on the new im- provement of Alessandro Street and that the City had not installed sidewalks as a part of that improvement. Mr. Goodman stated that he objected to item "f" under Condition No. 2, pertaining to a 20 foot minimum width connection between the subdivision and the existing paved section of Deep Canyon. He felt that item "f" was "redundant" . Mr. Goodman's next objection was to Conditions No. 4 and 5, regarding dedication of Lots 177 through 185. He suggested to the Planning Commission that the City accept the in lieu fee instead of the land dedication requirement. There was some disucssion regarding Dr. Rigby's property as a possible alter- native .dedication. Mr. Goodman also objected to Condition No. 7, pertaining to the C. C. & R's undergrounding requirement. DON SHAYLER, 73-893 Highway 111, spoke to the Commission regarding the shape and existing slope of the land. Mr. Shayler showed the water drainage routes on the map and stated that the street pattern was designed to accommodate drain- age. Mr. Shayler presented a list of proposed alternative conditions to the Commission. Said list included the deletion of item "f" under the existing Condition No. 2, the modification of item "i " , and the addition of items "j" and "k" to read as follows: i . The extensions of Primrose Drive and Erin Street shall be improved on the basis of thirty-two foot (32' ) of improvements on a fifty feet (50' ) of right-of-way. Type C curbs are approved on Erin Street. j. Street trees shall be -installed as part of the building construction on each lot, and shall be subject to the approval of the Design Re- view Board. {1 k. 5 foot wide sidewalks shall be constructed along the street frontages j of Lots 177 through 185, 24-25 ( 'A' Street only) and 134-144 ( 'A' Street only) Mr. Goodman then stated that he had already met with a representative of the 'school district and that the district had agreed to provide curb and gutter and sidewalks along Rutledge Way up to the new subdivision. Chairman Wilson asked if anyone was present who wished to speak to the Com- mission in favor of the project. Being no one, he asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak against the project. -4- i MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 31, 1976 VICTOR CLARK, 74-280 Erin Street, spoke to the Commission as a representative of several citizens who lived in the area of the proposed subdivision. Mr. Clark presented a letter to the Commission, signed by 48 residents of the area, stating that they were not against the development of the vacant 54-acre site; however, they would like to propose consideration of a plan to cul-de-sac the majority of the streets that are now dead-ended. Mr. Clark further stated that they were asking that Magnesia Falls and Deep Canyon be the only streets that should be extended through. RICHARD KITE , 48-643 Stoney Creek, spoke to the Commission and was concerned with the recreation aspects of the project. Chairman Wilson asked Mr. Goodman if he wished to make a rebuttal . Mr. Goodman stated that they had attempted to achieve what Mr. Clark had re- quested, but that the drainage problem was a prime consideration due to the land being so flat. RONDI SALTER, 74-120 Desert Star Boulevard, spoke to the Commission voicing her concern about the preservation of the existing character of the neighborhood. ART BENDER, 74-020 Desert Star Boulevard, spoke to the Commission regarding his concerns on the extension of Desert Star Boulevard. He stated that Desert Star was the only boulevard in Palm Desert and that it had become a "raceway" and he was concerned due to the number of children who lived in the area. Chairman Wilson closed the Public Hearing and opened the matter for discussion among the Commissioners. Commissioner Berkey was concerned with access problems regarding Deep Canyon. Commissioner Kelly felt that there were too many problems at this time regarding the impact on the area pertaining to schools, families, park facilities, traffic, etc. She felt that the project should be continued until such time as the City Engineer could review it more thoroughly. Mr. Williams advised the Commission that if they decided to continue the hearing to the next Planning Commission meeting, the applicant would have to agree to the continuance or the project would automatically go to the City Council . Commissioner Van de Mark was concerned about the sidewalk issue and the width of the streets and felt that the City Engineer should be present in order to answer the technical questions pertaining to these issues as the Commission did not have the expertise to make a decision. i Commissioner Mills agreed with the suggestion for a continuance. Commissioner Berkey felt that there were a lot of unsolved problems regarding this project and that it needed more study. Chairman Wilson concurred with the idea of a continuance and felt that the pro- ject had been prematurely presented to the Planning Commission. Chairman Wilson further stated that legally the Commission must get the applicant's approval for a continuance and if the applicant so agreed, he should work with staff to resolve all the problems that had been discussed. Chairman Wil-son then reopened the Pub- lic Hearing to discuss the possible continuance. Mr. Goodman stated that he was disappointed as he had spent at least 22 months in discussing the subdivision with staff and they were in agreement with most of the Conditions of Approval . Mr. Goodman stated that he not been able to spend enough time with the City Engineer as the City Engineer had gone on vaca- tion just prior to this hearing. Mr. Goodman stated that time was of great im- portance and if he agreed to a continuance, he was requesting a definite date be set for the next hearing. -3- P •MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 31, 1976 A short discussion ensued between the Commission and Staff. A date for the next hearing was set for September 14, 1976. Chairman Wilson asked Mr. Goodman if he agreed to a continuance to September 14, 1976. Mr. Goodman replied that he agreed.. Mr. Victor Clark agreed to the continuance. I Mr. Art Bender was in favor of the continuance. Commissioner Kelly moved and Commissioner Van de Mark seconded to continue Tract 8237 to the Planning Commission meeting of September 14, 1976. Motion unanimously carried. Chairman Wilson called a brief recess at 8:55 pm and the meeting was reconvened at 9:07 pm. D. CASE NO. CUP 08-76 - DESERT EMPIRE TELEVISION CORPORATION Consideration of a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the con- struction of a television studio and office facilities on a 3-acre site, located on the north side of Park View Drive, west of Monterey Avenue (PR-7, S.P. ). Chairman Wilson asked Vice-Chaiman Berkey to preside over the discussion on this case and left the Chambers due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Williams showed slides of the location and explained the request for a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Williams further explained that the City Zoning Ordinance permits community facilities in the PR Zone by Conditional Use Per- mit and the Planning Commission must determine that by definition the proposed. television broadcasting studio and office facilities are allowable in the Planned Residential Zone District. Mr. Williams stated that staff felt that the use was appropriate for the area and zone for which it was proposed and that the project would be an asset to the community. Mr. Williams ended his presentation with a staff recommendation that the Planning Commission find such a use is within the intent and purpose of the Planned Residential Zone District and approve the Con- ditional Use Permit request, subject to compliance with conditions. Vice-Chairman Berkey asked if the applicant was present. JOHN CONTE, 75-600 Burro Lane, Indian Wells, (President of Desert Empire Tele- vision Corporation-Owner and Operator of KMIR-TV) spoke to the Commission re- garding his reasons for wanting to move his facilities from Palm Springs to Palm Desert. Mr. Conte stated that he had operated his studios under a Con- ditional Use Permit from the City of Palm Springs for the past eight years and that he had never had any complaints relative to the operation. Mr. Conte further stated that they were in agreement with practically all of the Conditions of Approval and he would like to have Mr. Ricciardi discuss the conditions with the Commission. ROBERT RICCIARDI , 73-700 Highway 111, stated that he was questioning the wording of Conditions No. 14 and 15. fie stated these conditions were unnecessary under i the Uniform Building Code and he therefore was requesting their deletion. The conditions is question read as follows: 14. The building must be fully protected by a completely automatic sprinkler system in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard No. 13. -6- C � r 4. Page 8, paragraph 4, omit the last sentence, "Motion unanimously carried." and insert the following: The motion carried with the following vote: AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Mills, Van de Mark NOES : None ABSTAIN: Wilson 5. Page 9, insert the following sentence after the 5th paragraph: "Chairman Wilson advised Ms. Huntington that there would only be one-story buildings around the perimeter of the location." 6. Page 10, Chairman Wilson requested that the second and third paragraphs be transposed. 7. Page 10, paragraph 6, omit the last sentence, "motion unanimously carried." and insert the following: "The motion carried with the following vote: AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Mills, Van de Mark NOES: None ABSTAIN: Wilson A motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, to ap- prove the minutes, as corrected, of the August 31, 1976.meeting was unanimously carried. VI. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter from Mrs. Fred Lande requesting for a determination of whether a Foster Home for 3 to 4 children would be allowed in the R-1 Zone District. Mr. Williams reviewed the above letter with the Commission. His report to the Commission also included a draft-letter to be sent to Mrs. Lande advising i - her of the Commission's findings. A short discussion ensued between the Commission and staff, which included a clarification of the definition of a "family" according to the Zoning Ordi- nance. The general consensus of the Commission seemed to be that a limit of 3 children would be allowable. A minute motion by Commissioner Mills, seconded by Commissioner Van de Mark, to instruct Mr. Williams to send a revised letter to Mrs. Lande indicating the Commissioner's decision regarding the limitation of 3 children, was unanimously carried. VII . PUBLIC Chairman Wilson explained the Public Hearing procedures to the members of the audience. A. CONTINUED CASE NO. TRACT 8237 - U. S. LIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION Consideration. of a.Tentative Map for a single-family _residential subdivi- sion on 54.5 acres of land located east of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater River Storm Channel , and west of Deep Canyon Road. i Mr. Williams began his presentation by stating that this case had been con- tinued from the August 31, 1976 Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Williams presented a letter to the Commission from the Desert Sands Unified School District. Said letter contained the following requests regarding the new subdivision. "1. Request additional street or Pedestrian walkwa be require Pedestrian access Detween the two schools and many of the proposed residences, especially in the southeast portion of the tract, will be difficult and must be by excessively long and circuitous routes unless a street or pedestrian walkway is provided connecting Rutledge Avenue and Desert Star Blvd. at a location such as through Lots 17 and 34 or adjoining lots to the east. Our experience has been that children will seek "short cuts" in the absence of streets or walkways in such circumstances which could cause trouble for property owners along both Desert Star and Rutledge." September 14, 1976 Page 2 i a 2. R_e uue�s�t _that view ohscuri_n wall be provided. tt is reques - that the eve-'doper-provide a view obscuring wall on the west property line between the proposed tract and the school dis- trict property adjoining (west side of Lots 177 to 185) for the pur- pose of restricting access to and from the school property through private residential properties. The added benefit of increased privacy to home owners is significant. If a block wall cannot be provided, a chain link fence with decorative landscape screening is recommended as a minimum acceptable substitute. " Mr. Williams stated that staff believed the School District's concerns had been adequately addressed with the revision of the tract map. Mr. Williams further explained that since the last Commission meeting of August 31st, the staff had met on several occasions with the applicant and his engineer. There were also meetings with the staff and the residents of the area. The result of those meetings is a revised Tentative Tract Map which resolves many of the concerns that the City Engineer, the Planning staff, and the citizens had with the subdivision. A lengthy discussion ensued covering the following issues: A list of items that have been resolved. Proposed community facilities dedication Improvement of Rutledge Way and Magnesia Falls Drive adjacent to the proposed Park site. Drainage Sidewalks Desert Star Boulevard Extension The benefits of the proposed subdivision were also discussed. They are as follows: Completion of circulation system in the area Provides the potential for reasonable priced housing Resolves an existing drainage problem Provides alternatives for safe and direct access to the Middle School and Community Park complex Increases an existing Park area Mr. Williams further explained that the Conditions of Approval were self- explanatory and conformed to .the existing revised map. He stated that staff recommended Planning Commission adoption of Resolution No. 178, forwarding the Tentative Tract Map to the City Council for consideration. Commissioner Kelly questioned .the wording on Condition of Approval No. 6. o z unter Cook explained that the second sentence of Condition No. 6, which reads as follows, should be omitted due to the fact that it was a part of the original Q conditions: W 6. Developer shall provide 5' wide P.C.C. sidewalks on both sides of Zz \ all interior streets, as required by the City Engineer. Sidewalk may be omitted on Primrose Lane between Erin Street and the cul-de- sacs. z:1u There was a lengthy discussion concerning the access problems on Deep Canyon tl-kooad. Commissioner Berkey was extremely concerned about this situation. Hunter Cook explained the right-of-way concept with reference to Deep Canyon Road. Commissioner Kelly wanted to know why a condition for street lights within the subdivision had been eliminated. September 14, 1976 Page 3 Mr. Williams explained that the City Council has not establised a policy for street lights as yet. I I Mr. Cook felt that a definite policy for street lights should be established. Z He stated that if a street light policy was established, there were two major Li° intersections within the subdivision that should have signals. These inter- -CC �� sections are Deep Canyon Road and Magnesia Falls Drive and "F" Street and C i Rutledge Way. z Commissioner Van de Mark felt that a street light should be installed at the intersection of Rutledge Way and Portola Avenue. Mr. Cook agreed that that intersection should have a street light but it was not as much a part of the subdivision. Mr. Williams stated that the real issue with regards to street lights was not who .was going to install them but rather the on-going costs of street lights and a determination of the level of street lights. Chairman Wilson asked if the applicant was present. FRANK GOODMAN, 73-655 Shadow Mountain Drive, spoke to the Commission regarding the subdivision. Mr. Goodman stressed the fact that there had been a good number of hours spent in working with staff on the revision of the Tentative Tract. Map. He stated that the layout of the streets had been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. He further stated that cooperation was excellent from all staff members that were involved. He also stated that he had generally agreed with all the requests of the staff; but that there were one or two matters of principal that he would like to discuss. The first major problem was the problem of dedication of property for the Community Park. The second major problem was the requirement for the instal- lation of sidewalks. Mr. Goodman requested that the subdivider only be re- quired to install sidewalks. on "F" and "A" Streets and Rutledge Way rather than the entire subdivision. Mr. Goodman again stated that he would accept all of the terms and conditions other than the park dedication condition and the sidewalk condition. DON SHAYLER, 73-893 Highway 111 (Engineer for the project) spoke to the Com- mission on the more technical aspects of the project. Mr. Shayler requested a re-write of Condition No. 12, which reads as follows: 12. The section of Desert Star. Boulevard between the existing improve- ments and "F" Street shall be constructed as a pedestrian and bicycle way. The existing improvement shall be curbed as necessary to exclude through traffic at this time. The unimproved portion of the right-of- way shall be landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Hunter Cook felt that the condition as written was adequate and did not present any problems. Chairman Wilson stated at this time the Commission would take any input in favor of the proposed subdivision. DALE MEAD, 74-161 Desert Star Boulevard, spoke to the Commission with reference to the traffic problems on Desert Star Boulevard. He had no opposition to the subdivision, his only concern was that Desert Star Boulevard should not go through. ART BENDER, 74-020 Desert Star Boulevard, stated he was in favor of the revised map as presented and that it had been a pleasure working with the staff. VICTOR CLARK, 74-280 Erin Street, stated he was basically in favor of the. revised map. Mr. Clark further stated he supported staff's condition re- garding dedication. He also stated that Deep Canyon Road should be considered as a prime entrance and exit route for the development. DIANE MEAD, 74-161 Desert Star Boulevard, spoke to the Commission with regards- to the access problem on Desert Star Boulevard, Chairman Wilson explained to Mrs. Mead that the intent was to block off Desert Star at this time but keep the option open for future years. .n-7r Pane 4 e RONDI SALTER, 74-010 Desert Star Boulevard spoke to the Commission in favor of the project. KENNETH ARNOLD, 74-360 Erin Street, spoke to the Commission in favor of the f project. lie also requested that the developer consider the drainage problem at the end of Florine Street. Being no further comments either in favor of or opposed to the project, Chairman Wilson closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Wilson stated he was pleased with the amount of.work that had been done with reference to the map revision and he was also pleased with the spirit of cooperation between the staff, the developer, and the citizens. Chairman Wilson then stated that there seemed to be two major issues for discussion at this time. The first issue dealing with the dedication of the lots west of Rutledge Way and the second issue dealing with sidewalks through- out the subdivision. Commissioner Berkey felt that the developer should dedicate the area west of Ruteldge Way for an extension of the existing park facilities and also that the developer should only be responsible for development of-the east half of the street. On the sidewalk issue, Commissioner Berkey felt that even though there wasn't a firm policy relating to sidewalks, sidewalks should be installed throughout the subdivision. Commissioner Van de Mark agreed with Commissioner Berkey. Commissioner Kelly was in favor of sidewalks throughout the development. She also .supported Commissioner Berkey's feeling that the developer should dedicate the area west of Rutledge Way for an extension of the existing park facilities and the concept of not requiring the developer to improve the west half of Rutledge Way adjacent to the park. At this point, Mr. Williams explained in detail the fact that the matter of the park dedication and whether Rutledge Way were to be improved full width were two separate issues. He indicated -strongly that Rutledge Way full im- provement was essential for good circulation in the subdivision. Commissioner Berkey agreed that these were separate issues and it was the con- sensus of. the Commission that the developer should fully improve Rutledge Way adjacent to the Park, except for sidewalks on the west side. Chairman Wilson stated that the Commission seemed to be in agreement on both issues, unless the City Council overrides the Commission. Chairman Wilson also stated that he was also in favor of the developer dedicating the area west of Rutledge Way and having a requirement for the installation of side- walks throughout the subdivision. There was a short discussion regarding the issue of widening Deep Canyon Road. All the Commissioners agreed that Deep Canyon Road was going to be a very important access point. oChairman Wilson then asked for a consensus of opinion regarding the park z dedication. UJ Q Commissioner Kelly asked if there was any of getting the full 2.7 acres. W 1 Mr. Williams pointed out the alternatives on the map. z Commissioner Berkey requested additional input from the developer. Chairman Wilson reopened the Public Hearing. Frank Goodman spoke to the Commission regarding the hardship that would be caused on the developer if the entire 2.7 acres were dedicated. The dedi- cation of the full 2.7 acres would require the replacement of an entire water main and laterals which he had participated in its construction or) the premise that Rutledge Way would not be moved. 'Chairman Wilson closed the Public Hearing. September 14, 1976 Page 5 Commissioner Van de Mark moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 178, with the property west of Rutledge Way being dedicated to the park and the remaining be accepted as lieu monies ; the deletion of the second sentence under Condition No. 6, and the correction to Condition No. 13; also the wording changes recommended by staff regarding the second page of the resolution (changing Lots 177-185 to read: the area west of Rutledge Way (Avenue)). Commissioner Berkey seconded the motion. Chairman Wilson asked if there was any further discussion on the matter. Commissioner Kelly stated that she was not satisfied with the park dedication arrangement, in terms of not getting the. full 2.7 acres and also the width of Deep Canyon Road, south of the subdivision. Chairman Wilson explained that Condition No. 4 spelled out the 20' accession Deep Canyon, 'south of the subdivision. Commissioner Kelly stated that she wanted the park to be the full 2.7 acres and she also wanted Deep Canyon Road to be developed to a full width of 32' , south of the subdivision. The motion was carried with the following vote: AYES: Berkey, Mills, Van de Mark, Wilson NOES: Kelly Chairman Wilson called a brief recess at 8:38 pm. The meeting was reconvened at 8:50 pm. VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. DISCUSSION OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE COLLEGE OF THE DESERT AREA 1. Preliminary Circulation Plan for Various Blocks. Mr. Williams explained that this item was under the Old Business section of the agenda due to the fact that the history of the C.O.D. area had already been presented to the Commission. Further, at the next study session meeting, the Commission would receive a report from the staff containing comments from other agencies pertaining to the C.O.D. Specific Plan. Mr. Williams then discussed the General Project Area Concerns with the Commission. A Sub-Area Analysis was discussed which included 5 sub-areas as follows: The Palm Del Block (north of 44th, from Highway ill to Monterey) The C.O.D. Block (north of 44th, from Monterey to Portola) The Deep Canyon /Block (north of 44th, from Portola to Cook) The Palma Village #12 Block (south of 44th, from Monterey to San Pablo) �- The Palm Vista Block (south of 44th, from Monterey to Fairhaven) Slides of the major streets in the above areas were shown to the Com- mission. Mr. Williams stated that the most important predominant feature of the area would be the area of 44th Avenue and Monterey Avenue. Sam Freed explained that all the figures used pertaining to the average daily traffic volume were taken from 1973 Riverside County Traffic Rec- ords. Chairman Wilson was concerned with the gigantic area that was involved and the amount of time it would take to discuss this. SnDtrm.her 14 . 1976 Page 6 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 5, 1976 7 PM - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER The regularly scheduled meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Wilson at 7:00 pm in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall . II . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Commissioner Kelly III. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioner GEORGE BERKEY Commissioner GLORIA KELLY Commissioner NELSON MILLS Chairman S. ROY WILSON Absent: Commissioner MARY K. VAN DE MARK (excused absence) Others Present: Paul A. .Williams - Director of Environmental Services Hunter Cook - City Engineer Steve Fleshman - Associate Planner Sam Freed - Assistant Planner IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES of the meeting of September 14, 1976 Mr. Williams suggested the following corrections be made to the above minutes: Page 3, 3rd paragraph from the bottom, rewrite the last sentence as follows: "Commissioners Berkey and Mills were extremely concerned with the proposed substandard right-of-way widths within the proposed ex- tension of Deep Canyon between the subdivision and the existing portion of Deep Canyon near 44th Avenue. " Page 5, 7th paragraph from the bottom, delete the phrase "of opinion". Page 5, 6th paragraph from the bottom, add the word "way" after the word "any". Page 7, 3rd paragraph under NEW BUSINESS, complete the word "reservoir". Mr.. Hunter Cook requested that the following corrections be made: Page 3, 5th paragraph from the bottom, rewrite as follows : "Hunter Cool: explained that the second sentence of Condition No. 6, which reads as follows , should be omitted due to the fact that it does not pertain to the current revision of the tract map. " Page 4, 2nd paragraph from the top, the last word of the second sentence, "signals ' should be deleted and replaced with "street lights". A motion of Commissioner Mills, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, to approve the' minutes, as corrected, of the September 14, 1976 meeting, was unanimously carried. October 5, 1976 Page One 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 Date: September 27; 1976 LEGAL NOTICE CITY of PALM DESERT A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP OF 182 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 54 ACRES SITUATED IN THE R-1-9,000 ZONE DISTRICT CASE NO. TT 8237 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Tentative Subdivision Map of 182 single-family lots on 54 acres and situated in the R- 1-9,000 Zone District, located south of Magnesia Falls Drive ex- tended and west of Deep Canyon Road extended. �•... COMMUNITY :?", 5t C {COL PARK rt:4? v,_� '"1r7p q.. f DESERT STAR BOUC - �•J,�'f / •. T ✓ E SAID Public Hearing will be held on October 14, 1976, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all in- terested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN ACTING CITY CLERK PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post September 30, 1976 0 / nF - 1:v S..it "-'.sE`',n,ry• I: N•. F :'vERS.�; .;,,.F i.. R E'.ACEAS !- •=v FARCE. M ;AND IMPP;MN}S CIE.": NS 4E' Ei 4NER5 NAME ., , $E .}-ER/ASSES 40DAE55 1161LiL '.11�SLf2 SA4E1=! E 7051 IAt! ROGER A. 141Y MGM ICA S. 74 Jik w;J e21 •�)-:J1-' 1125 TS)P. n 175' : V3e00 CLORINE AVE, PALM DESERT Ca ti22a0 -?7/7a R: LOT.14 MS 09/0 t.- lk ^•T_2505 -_ - I•22r. d.:6-002 621•N1-4:2-r 1i25 )66/ " M ICMEI LYLE, MICMEL JACOUEL N 4365C FLORINE AVE, PALM DESERT CA 92260 = 05,72 Al LO'.20 M11_MQI: LPRST_z505 .. - l2 fir^•32 F2t-•A3-023-5 112S 5151 t2•. V V67 N 1tSI M. tt s l 1}J Pi 13900 FLGAINE AVE, PALM OE_-RT CA M2 0 LQ' 21. �Q-4 VfL0'!Q.1R4CT.y SOS- 162625 :1�•';02 621••A]-D0"-6 1125 75 z} �.5� 'RC1101.4C4 6EMJAMIN 135 E CARMEL GREEN. PCRT HUENEME, CA t2/�] R1 !11.•S0_FL4RIME P]E_.- ._ -- . 3103 L:1 22 fib OV5/or6 TRAtT 25D5 WIN AN tAi HWI C SIS"OF`OF s4i Oit,L ^226)C CIP••002 621-•A1•007-Y 65J3 J2z:'J CN rT•1J REYERAMO A G MAIDS, 60L 995. PALM DESERT CA : 03170 Cl PF JJ'G 4332S- DEEP CANYON RO ]10] P6f9 FOR TOTAL IN PDA DESCRIPTI,-h SEE &SSE130R SS MA D$ - J1S-001�621-440.002.6 59537v 2975 M,.S NQA) 'MtTCMEL i'f: M,._TFLC6 W5 LAVELLE - AT 90% 633, Wolf CALIF, 42202 AtRES IN P,'R SE IN�F�A ti;i AL SEC 0E5CI-1611CN/SLEF ASSESSON S 5f:APSE. - -' 2796 - .._ - 052322 015.001 621-140.003.7 6500 160 .A D 3 C CG IV V960 133Q7,QFQL_OCRE SER TjMGPPRD SEE I/4,CF Iot SEC 16 TSS AbE OS171 Al 2663 FOB TOTAL OESERIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS 269i :MlTCNEII 00 N , RCEISOM-IAYELtE 016-001 621•V90-009-6 11910PP 66T' 2J361 SOX S33, INO.:. CALIF, 92202 Al ~�i0_AL TOTAL OE SCR SEE' AS$E$SLR S SEC 16 s MAPS V993 - V 443• ,I~1IG6r ELVERER C,, AIEiAI10ER -N�AOLO B. - 141703 075-0V2 621.990.005.9 7374 3324 2y�20�0SANTA MONICA 6LV 104, $ARIA MONICA, CA, : 10/73 ?— 01`E1 AFORS TOTALI DESCRIPTION lSEE ASSESSORSS S 2VV II AUQEASA N LA Y L. _-- 0"619 Ole-601 6'1•500-001.5 65J0TY ]:0 13014 LEON LAUDEASACN, P 0 501 477, S LAGUNA. CA, • 05/69 Al A19R 1 FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION/SEE ASSESSORS MAPS ' S6NS �LAU --���-----y�4b74 _. -- - -Olt.O01 '421-500.002-4, - 1440 l9Ts U9rC L(ON LAUOEASACN, P 0 SO/ 477, S LAGUNA, CA, • OS/69 Al - - -- - - TY 7 3961 9nI .� 1l! A6E FOR TOTAL OESCAIFTION SEE ASSESSORS MAP ATZS' 9 M -- -- -- — 1"T•TC ASSE53ntuf 'ROLL tOUNIY DP A1VE11ME rASE tll YET OWNERS NAME RECPROERS NO IRA PARCEL N0. LAND IR►NYANIS f'f MPT1UNS NET •MeQ(Se AAl1.LY.�_31ILS111S6f1E151_.. .. .. .0 IL USE. 41rE.A/AS,�� 14V2( 541E 1G N RANNEY INC, NANNEV SYLVIA J. 01�61e Ole-001 �2t•S00 083•T SO�IV s9ss GILNENT R RANNEY CIO RANNEY ASSOC, 1501 N 1 RIN• 01/1S Al _Umi wf. sAN1A AAA, LJL_.1V0 3490 " 10.00 ACRES IN PON SE I/% CC ff I. m Nit FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS `6 [ �RNNEY (YC��AMtiEr 3rLYI�J. - - - 01364T 0 U-OOI 621-506.004.1 b+T STY 6YSS 14)), GILRENT R RANNEY C/O RANNEY ASSOC, 1501 M %GAIN• O1/TS AT lLA ,-9 7 F' 1e6/ 9. AL ES A/l 1in CT! At i/N Sit Ii_ TSS 26E FOR TOTAL OESCNI►TION SEE ASSESSORS MRPS - OTS204 011-001 621 S00 006.0 tw 0 1"' $102 '2EPEDA SCHMI-DT iSq%6 LINE A"- MEYRr SCNMIDt, S9N1 LIME AVENUE, LONG RUCN 06,12 ++ CALIF, 40405 •D0 �• AAn2j- ` .nt t)s•nt.-pJ�19.i....►_1�.: ...-• �.� .. � .. !: 1C0 \FrAJ1A% LEO. \OVAJIAII SoboAl i2 • •V 600 StN AVE S. NA PIE S. fL a. ,nt IthNA eu,/eet_ flusI17_.t"k, t11LAGL� _ 300 i F.VAJItt LEO. \CYAJI61 SU\Ci• 156Sbr DtS 011 it1 ♦1 r•011 1 )00 600 STH AVE S, 116%Lt S, FL I2,1+ •r ,nt 127 HA can/n01 rn�\tRY.ilul.11lLEGF L -9 - lOp OrAJ SAN 1E0, \Ova JIAN SUNOA+ iS1S 6-r 015-011 621•r2r 01 2 300 600 S1H AVE S. RAPLES, fL ' 12171 yr . DOpD 6l ACYS C. Y3111GE y- .- - - O/S•011 t21-r2i-01`- 1 306 • IS70 1AMOW4 LANE. SANTA \AR\ARA CALIF, 13109 • rY . .7r Tu nre/ Ing em,btir ,uA 111LAGE_1.. -.- )DO rEE%E1 fDNA A. O15.OI1 411-42r-017.5 300 1110 3RO AVE APT 11041, SAN OffGO CALIF, 12101 rr i11 HA nae/enr renbt\v r,uL-ULLAGE y._.-.. - - 300• 6JYAJIAN LEO. \OVAJIAR SUNDAv 1SIS41 01S•Oft i2!•r2r•O14 l 300 600 STN AVE S. RAPLES. FL 12/Tr Tv li LAt; y_. - - - �• "'Alta% LED. 10YAJIAN SU10AV iS656i 075•011 621•r2r-011.1 ]00 Am STN AVE S, RAPLES, fL • 12/7r YY - nuci —— 2bs0 STERLING SVCS I LOAN ASS1 • 032177 r• 018-001 421•rr0.001.0 26r0 US LIFE SVCS R LOAN, S220 WILSHIRE ILVO. LOS -- 3.30 ACRES MIL I% POR SY 1/r Of SEC It TSS 16E FOR TOTAL OESCRIPTI0 SEf ASSESSORS __ STERLING SVGS I LOAN ASSN 032177 - 016.001 i21-rr0.003.2 11630 11630 US LIFE SVGS R LOAN, S220 WILSHIRE \LVO. LOS • 01/69 Al 141.S3 ACRES M/L to 002 SW 1/4 Of SEC 16 TSS 04[ FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS -- STERLING SVCS \ LOAN ASS% 012171 018.001 421-rr0.009•] 52TO 5270 US LIFE SVGS A LOAD S220 YILSNIRE ILVD, LOS • 04161 rT _ 5.41 ACRES MIL In PON SW t/r OF SEC 16 TSS RPE FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS ROMAN CATHOLIC 11SHOP OF SAN DIEGO OIS•00] 621-4r0-005•4 1120 1120 lox 111, PALM DESERT CALIF, 12240 Tsq CI .It FOR TOTAL OESCRI►LION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS - f11j 1915•li ASSESSMERI ROLL COUR7Y Of RIVERSIDE PALE 11S IDI RS 11m RECORDERS NO IRA PARCEL 40. LARD IMPAVRITS EXEMPTIONS NET + Ayuyyua -s• '•I nAty_ sr � 'r .�IIMFt/J3SEi ----"1]1f0- sT 1urG s\rt1Gs f LOA1 Ass% 006930 011•001 u1•rro ooZ »'s0 US L. SYCS 1 LOAN, $220 YILSNIRE tlV O. LOS • O1/61 rT 1 PON IttSEs FOR TOTAL USCRPONE asss-16 os MAPS !-__- RI2LER MORRIS 1., WILE I ILEI LA FRICIA 0. 0lSirr 011.001 621•rSt 001-� 1125�593 5711� 74030 DESERT STAR \LV, PALM DESERT CA 12260 = 06/619 RI _ _ 1 nt L Nt eAuetS_luct tst9 - -- ---- WILLIAMS CHARLES, WILLIAMS CAROL O06l)t 018•003 621•r41.002•S 1125 rtr0 MO 1750 4I35 7 r0%0 0[SERT ST Al DI, ►ALR OESENI CA 92260 = 06/64 01 M 2 a eu/etS fIACT 2SZi. t--- ONISSEL 008 U.. OSISIEL DOLORIS M. 112730 — 016.001 i21•rS1-003.6 �1125 9770 S\9S 7iie1I&PARISSST. PALM DESERT. CA - -_� 10/lr R1 - --- -— -- -.�- _ LOT 1 N1 0161111 11 A[S 2521 -_- _-•- I — --- --- r-- -- —' - r01L[f1S011 t1k1lA \. 017119 016.001 i21•rSl•00 i•7 1125 —rl rl S\K• 71.210 HIGHWAY Ill. PALM OESf AT CALIF 01/l0 R1 _'"----- t LOT % M1 0416/075 TRACT 2521 4CNAUDO11 0. L., CHAUDOIN CONCNITA M. 016161 _ 016.001 621•rSl•005.1 1125 41936 NO 17SO r311 79070 DESERT STAR SLV, PALM DESERT CA 92260 = 02/70 at�SlAti SCN%ELLER M OS2S1] OI6-OOl ttl•rSl•006-9 1125 r12r HO 1757r010 KSIIV. ►ALM DESERT CA 11260 = 05/69 RInAC7 2s71 - - fCNYERIEI El1ti L.. SCNYENIEI YALIMAUT M. OIrS01 O11.001 621•rSi•00T•0 1125 rS 9) HO ITSO I9i\ 7r010 DESERT CTAN \Lr. RANCHO MIRAGE CA 92210 = 02170 it - -- nI r ws nw e71�LC* tabsWILLIAMS 001ENT I., WILLIAMS \EVENLY C. tOr479 016-001 621•451-000--1 1125 SW 6992 rI PO AVE110A SEVILLA, CYPRESS CALIF • t0/419 I1 - y,--__ •. - _-_ --• ,- y -r- LOT 1 FII 096JOIf TRACT 2S11 ITCHELL TILLIE 111L01 01E-001 t21•rSl-OOt•2 1124 bSl NO -S-Ts 0 - 402C TILLIE MITCHELL CIO RUDOLPH M NITCHELL. 14110 = 09/79 I1 LOT 1 M 096/O Tf INACT 2521 11CNA10SOR N e.. IICNAIOSOR LI10A L. SOS 12) 01\•001 621•rSI-010•! Ili4 N!1 NO li SO r06\, 14120 OMIT STAN ILV, ►ALN DESERT CA 12260 = 10/61 R1 _ CIAII elal M L, CRAKE DOLLY M. 125171 -_ 018-001 621-01.011.3 t12S rT10 HO^ 1Tso r14. 11I30 KURT VAN 1LV. PALM DESERT CA 12260 12/61 AlAll 1424 _ CIRtN01 Ee 3 asr D.. GIIT as QW0111 NER Mr0%G H. 120312 ---016.001�621•ISI-012•r T ll2s 9124 %0 1750 •f-r111{ TIt10 DE1E1t frA1 1Lr, PALE OESERT CA 92240 • 1110 at - - ZACI JOMI P., 2ACI IUCV A. O2T)ll 01�•OOl t21•�Sl•Ol)•S llts �7A1 NO 11405199i 74110 DESERT IT AI 11r, ►ALM DESEII CA 12260 = 03/10 At MA/11501 LMMf E i., NAI1130I LY1N A. 311151 -� b1/�001 621•�S1.Ots•� 11� �-�;��b it�b f1�1T 7U 60 DESE1i STAR ILr, PALM DESERT CA 12260 —• 11/41 _ R1 �— 11if•il AfSEySMERI 1pLLV COUITr OF NIVCNS10[ •-- -� PACE 114 RAMf eEC0i0E1f 10 IRA FROM NO. LAN$ iMPAVRITS EXEMPTIOIS off 'plrEll . -- IIll1E.SbSIEI. f193 _._..._...... •.,r.—i,•a wA=..a m A•e\t A21.9f1.OIf1 1125 If21 SCNWf NIEF ELN ST SCHWCNICR wA��ba,• `l761 /M10 DESERT Stall ILY, RANCHO MI16:E CA •2ZY • 02'15 Fr a^T t-11_OS6JL71.)11t1.2S21. - 7RrM�1 uILLIAMS R06fRT V., WILL UMS /EYERLY G. f01571 01N•001 421.451.005.1 1125 S6S7 615E A M ATEIIMa SEVILLA. CYPRESS CALIF • 10/61 Rl .1.00-OLSEl3. L01 a M6 1116/O7S iR■CT 25t1 NI TCNEII TILLIf -- _ - - - 113601 014-001 621.151.001.E 1125 !bS) NO 1750 WYS G ttUtt MITC14ELL C/C PUOOLON H MITCHELL, TVIO • 01/11 01 r I ctA! SI.Ya--t nrxr R1 f-A_•9226Q_ LOT 1 FI C16/OTS TRACT 1521 RICNAR.IlDSOA.N 1 0.. 11CNAR010. UPI) 1.- IOS1t) - •016.001 6-21-NSA.O10.2 11tS !61) NO ItSO 106e / 1a120 DESERT STAR Rlr, PALM DE Sf RI CA 122 60 + 10/41 P1 __ _ A n,A.n1t ......1529 ~ CRANE DICK M L, CRANE DOLLY M, 12S1T1 O16.001 621-1S1-011•) 1125 _ 1710 NO l7S0 1165 7 41 30 DESERT Si AP ILV, PALM DESERT CA 12260 12/69 RI 6tNiNER UPPY 0.. GINTHEP MY N. 120512 016.001 6t1.1S1.01t•1 1125 1621 NO 1750 r199, N"0 DESERT S1AR ILV. PALM DESERT CA 12260 = 11161 Al 2ACK JOHN Pi. 2ACK IUCY A. 021331 Ole-0D1 621.151-013-5 1 225 5T69 NO 1T50 5111 T 4150 DESERT STAR ILV, PALM OESEPT CA 12210 - 03170 KI 14ARVISON LAWRENCE F., HARRISON LYNN A• 119956 018-001 621.151.051-6 11 55 —§S10 NO 1T50 lEL S� T1160 DESERT STAN ILY, PALM DESERT CA 92260 - 11/69 R1 _- AT I i MP ANTS-76 ASSE°SMENT ROLL COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE a PAGE 196 'OWMERS NAME RECORDERS NO TPA PARCEL NO. LAND IMPRVMNIS EXEMPTIONS _- 59S] NET x wrf-, nAlg ❑xr 0iW[N/Mere PEMR121GRDTN DONAL9 J.. PERNINGR0IM EVELYN E. 063616 Ole-001�621.1S1•O1S-7 f— 1125 1e2e 626E MANCELLEVA CA. NUNTINGT ON 'EACH CA 06/69 R1 , LOT IS M6 016/01S TRACT 2521 'WALKER nnlfOl E., WALKER NANCY S. 036639 01e•001 621-151.016.E 1125 !741 NO 1750 1136 i r110 DESERT Slat RV, PALM DESERT CA 92260 - 01n4 R1 ,nt u�at,nl3 TRACI I", 001 5 -019 - 2 _O161 SO . 693 NO AT'0 r066 F0RTE26 CNARLES A., FORTE2A OfANE 71140 DESERT STAN 'LV, PALM DESERT CA 92260 = 02/71 R1 _-- i ,nt au 13 1 1 016.00 6I1.1S2.001. - it NO 1T 50 -U39 A KP1C J., %EARNfY FRANCESA. 7 [E6ARM SI, C6IE0A1. CITY CALIF RI 7 • Ar■ na f LOT1S xaM6 0)6/076 SHADOW VILLAGE 1 LEWIS CNA►LES A.. LEWIS GISELA 018.002 621.132-002 6 1125 rl T9 NO 1750 345V 71027 ASTER OR, PALM DESERT CA 92260 = P1 _ CHANDLER•GE O R GE E.,. CNANOIER CAR CL 016.00E 62l•rS2.00)-9 1125 6077 NO 1750 J Sr52 74011 ASIEK DR. PALM DESERT CA 92260 - R1 1 n1 11 MR .1"AaA -MAnnu vp1 E I - -- --- .JULSON JAMES W., JULSON BERNICE M. 016.00E 621-1S2.004-0 1125 Ve TS 6000 121E COMMUNITY ST • P1 _ ' LOT 32 M6 0361076 SNAOOW VILLAGE 1 ilOPE2 PATRICIA A. 03936E 016.00E 621-152-005-1 1125 r661 5e09- 1 7RO65 ASTER OR, PALM DESERT CA 12260 = 04/69 KI IOOINS DENNIS R. it. DOWNS MAPr E. 016.002 621-rS)•001.0 , 1125 1919 HO 1750 1321' !! 14 016 ASTON 01 ai^ � ra m ■ LOT 16 MI 0311076 SHADOW VILLAGE I 0142 MANCELINO JR, DIAZ JESUSITA C. 050521 Ole•002 621.143.002.1 1125 r750 NO 1150 4125 ASTER 00, PALM OESEll CA 92260 = 01/71 R1 [Et�rSTICIE CN6RLE3 L.. EU51X1L SOSANNE 05266E016.002 621-01-00)-2 1125 537S NO 1750 1150; AST,. DP, PALM DESERT CA 12260 = 04/71 R1 •lI/\Y JOHM T. 111, ltl\v tAR OLVN 100615 010.002 621-153.001-3 1125 41e1 NO IiSO 3551 1/OS6 ASTER as, PALM DESERT CA 12260 - 0901 P1 _ x,nL t.,A��•.„Air 1 JULSON JAMfS W.. JUL SON /ERNICE M. 016.002 621-15]-OOS•r 1125 F13e HO 1750 ♦313 74061 AST(* OR, PALM DESERT CA 92260 = At �' aw 016.00E 621.153.006.5 112S 1170 NO 1750 111S1 NILSSON JEAN, NILSSON LYNN = At 14071 ASTER DR. PALM Df SERT CA 92210 MASTIC JOMI l.. NASiIE IOA M. 012911 016.001 621.153.007-6 1125 3917 NO 1150 33221 71.015 VELAR00 ON, PALM DESERT CALIF. 92260 02/64 RI VENA/LE LLOYD I., VEN►ILE ELIZAeETH A. 018-001 621•r53.006-1 1125 111r WO IISO 1511,. 74027 VELAN00 OK, PALM DESERT CA 12260 - R1 MP - 1i7S•76 ASSESSMENT ROLL Ci9Nir OF RIVERSIDE PaGE 79R Ov%EPS NAME PECCRCEAS NO IRA PARCEL NO. LAND IMPRVMNIS EIEMPTICNS NET ADDRESS DATE GSE OTNEP/ASSES CRCSShAN LLOYD A,. GRCSSMAM '4 AN A. 1r1679 Ole-001 621-51-009.8 1125 3676 N0 1750 3051 C/C SNNRS MTGE CO. 74041 VELAROC OR, FALh 12/65 RI DESERT CA 92260 i LOT ol M8 038/051 SMADCW VILLAGE 2 'R 1 M OEV i INV CONSULIANTS 1NC V26572 018-001 621-451-010-6 1125 11r2 ur6T 79508 6E Rh u0A DUNES CA, SERMUOA DUNES. CA O3/75 R1 74051 VELARDO.OR - ° - LCI IDo Me Ole/O51 SHADOW VILLAGE 2 rLIPFEI ''.ECRCE F,, NLIPTtL SE9ERL• W., ELIPFEL 622232 Ole-601 621-453-011-1 1125 3128 NJ 1150 3103 HAW,- L.. KLIPFEL DE6ORA4 A. 02/7r AT 7069 VELARDO OR, PALM_DESERT. CA 7r067 VELAADF OR A LOT 99 M6 0381051 SHADOW VILLAGE 2 5ENNAn LYNN 4., 6ENNAM OM"0 C. - O16.001 61.1.953.012-0 1125 3728 No 1750 3103 74087 VELARCO CA. PI-M DESERT CA 92260 = R1 LOT 96 Me 038/0:. ADCW VILLAGE.2 'ROW toss A.. Obli rR - (163225 016.001 621-454-001-1 1125 3858 4983 48200 PAINIEC CANrAN IR, PALM DESERT, CA 05172 R1 74016 YELAROC_0? _ A LCT for KS o)e/osl SHAW rILLACE 2 •BILLER NiROLO A.Jk, MILLED CAROL'J. 05397 018.001 621-459.002-4 1125 3333 NO - 1750 270e 7r026 VELANDO OR, PALM DESERT CA 922GO 05175 Al LOT IDS mS_O30!OS1 SMAp ON VILLAGE 2 CIL CAR RE DESERT CA 5 12160 NEY V - 109/73 R1 OIS-001 621•451-003.5 1125 3308 NO 79090 VELAA00 M OA, PALM 1T50 266) 'ARMEILOREOE4/OslNA-SOOY VILLAGE 2 S F NCE 0 A2961 016.001 621-454-009.6 3125 3529 NO ,750 2895 74058 VELARDO ON, PALM DESERT CA 92260 09/7S Al lOT_301 MB O7Q/951_SM100M VILLAGE 2 'GRIFFIN NANCY R. OI e-001 621.95 9-OOS•T 1125 3666 r993 7A062 VELARDO OR, PALM DESERT CA 92260 - 91 lOL1Q6_J.1D.0�4lO.SI„59ADOII V-ILLAGE 2 -AATSCH ROBERT C. 016-001 621.959-006-6 1125 1866 9993 L R1 Sol VV L0 109 AS 03e/e51 SHADOW riiiAii i' :61EAC�li L ANG--g.0_ � _-- --• - _ - 069091 018.001621.451.007.9' --1125 - 4119" - - - 52A4- C/o THUNDERBIRD FOUMTRY CLUB, P 0 601 V, PALM 06/79 Rl TNIO6 V L 000 0�----�-_- -- -- - LOT 110 M8 038/051 SHADOW MILEAGE 2 ----" 01351T-'-"-' DI5.0D1-b2ti=N59=oo6 556s' 129 MYRTLE AVENUE, LONG BEACH CALIF ; 07/7I Al 1 4125 DESERT STAR 6 Y ------..-- -.... . .---- ------------ ------ . "1f�I�-----071705--'--- II7E=QDT 321=fS•9=00"9-f'---�125—'—S3SD-710'-T7S11----- NTZS' 19031 ERIN $1, v�LM OfSERI Ci 92260 - 03/72 RI --- LOT 36 MS 016/015 TRACT 2521 ROLL C(UtT4 O>-"R7 PE131DE .PAGE 199 OWNERS NAME NECOROERS NO IRA PARCEL 90. LAND IMPRVMNTS EXEMPTIONS NET A0MNV6A �111.L•SII1L41J1• = DATE_—USE_—.____."_v — OTHgR/ASSE SINTERS JAMES E., SUMMERS CAROL L M. -' , 00v72 NI 018.001 621•v39.0"=1"'-"' 'Ti'lf-- Nty l - _ S916 7N0N1 ERIN ST. PALM OESERT CA 12260 M1LE1I1_CM.A ESxE 9� OOzsis u-016=0oi 6ii i5N-0it:2 - --11 2S ' 'ie21 00 ITsb 3496 71512 LITTLE BEND it, PALM DESERT, CA • ?,05" IIL_ST- — k- —---- - --� -- -- -- - - + - - ^- --.. _ - LO1 3% no 0A6/ols 1RACT�v"— 'OUNIEII-111CHAR0 M,i o"u9eiE11 REBfc�A_--" - - ---oslelY_- - 'Ole=Doi ►21.9S•=01?;1 "fits - 121) NO 17s0 34.66 74O11 ERIN $1, PALM DESERT CA 12260 = 041/1) R1 LOT 11.n(._CN LL iR.OiNllt+ _ — — .-LEN ROBERT i., ALIEN JOAMNE % �--' OV605 - oie�ool'6t1.9s 9.033.1 ills • -s/t/ 10 1TS0 5102 /9061 ERIN ST, PAL" DESERT CA 92260 , 06/11 Al LOT. N2 LIB-qq-6 75IRA 2571 _ ,_. �69 NO lTfO 9009 EY LA 11 .-IL 011368 011.001 621. SS•001.6 112 7Aii191 11DESERTpSTAN��B�LV, PALM DESERT CA 12260 = 0)//2 Al •CNUCA 7D[MMl VT ONUC"R-"f ATN&CNX29 01A061 011.001 621•t9s•OD 2.7 llts 9291 NO 11s0 3661. i N`l1g961 IN, STAN BLV, c►TALM22 DESERT CA 92260 = 02/12 Al ANnIS1 11-�-04/i0i77STIi-7IS11A S. 04123 016.001 611.1ss•003.6 112S 4100 N0 1730 N175 114171 DESERT STAR SLY, PALL DESERT CA 92260 A 09/12 Al LOT 90 nt.Q1}J OE^.I!ASI-If2t - 090010 016,001 62I-0s-001.1 112s 421) No 1750 3►61 MEAD GALE, MEAO OIANE . 0)/li RI 1M161 DESERT STAR BLV, PALM DESERT CA 12940 t rO r1 ERiN ;T, PAiM C(S3 A• •� • ' T�3 LCI 35 M1S 016/0)5 TRACT 252+ v7t5+E o+• Oi.t 621 .,59 Oil-t 1125 •623 No 1750 T+A6 1 PILLEA CNAPLCS E. JP . =3512 L111Lt SEND TA. PALM OESEAI, CA • 02/75 Al 14051 fRIN S1 LCI 3% Me 04"07S ti,AeT 2529 OXER RICNARD M., Ounto WCIECIA = Oki?) At 016.001 621-r5 r•Ol r•] s121 4743 No 1150 366e 7.071 LOIN SI, PALM DESERT CA 17260 LO1 33 Me 096/0IS, 1RAC1 2529 •=LEY AOAERI E.. AL LEY JOAN NE L. 010623 016.001 67t-r5 r-01]•r Tits ST21 NO 1150 510 7r061 ERtN Si, PALM DESERT CA 1t260 = 06/73 Al l0T l2 Me Orb/O?S TRACT 2521 Die 621•435.001.6 1125 rb71 NO tTSO r00• 1LE• ICAYIE M., ILEr LI hbA D. = 031306 RI IN141 0[SEAT STAR SLY. PALM DESERT CA 92760 lC( 16 Me CT0T5 TRACT 2529 'C NUCA et ANIS C cMucE NAR€N Ot60e1 Ole•001 621•r55.002-1 I125 4791 NO 1150 666 74`110p1 UESERI STAR SLY, PALM Dt StOt CA 92?60 = 02172 RI 1-0 ANM V% JPEL n ANMISOYC RE eE CCA S. 0Ar922 016.00L 621•455-003.6 1125 re00 ND 1150 -ITS 71.171 DESERT STAN SLY, PALM DESERT CA 92260 = 01/72 Al Lot 20 Me 0r6/D11 TRACT 2529 MEAD GALE. MEAD 0IANE Or0090 OItl 001 6t1•r55.00r-v 1125 4293 NO 1750 66 3 74161 DESERT STAN DIY. PALM DESERT CA 92260 = 03112 R1 LOT 21 Me 096101S TRACT 2529 r629 NO ITSO TA1S1 OESEPI SIAR 400r MA SLY, PALM DESERT. CA • 006/72 At Ol 6.00t bil-r55-005.0 I125 1r151 DESERT, STAR SLY A • Lei 22 Me 0/6/075 TRACT 2529 OROUCNAN SERNANo Y., eROU&NAI JOAN C. 026727 Ole•001 621•05.006.1 1115 5601 NO IT50 4419 14141 DESERT STAR SLY, PALM OESERI CA 12260 = 03/12 11 LOT 23 11A-0.1e/OT5 IRACI 2529 -Ole J DEFRIEN14131 DE JAMESSJ., OUROO OE SCHARLOTTE M . 0CA pj9j; Rl Ole•OOt 621•rS5.00 T-2 1125 rig] NO Ir00 Iv131_DESLRJ. SLIT! eLY_ A LOT 2r Me 0r6/075 TRACT 2529 'Polls CMARNOLD Y.. PORSCM CAINEAINE J. 030992 016-001 621-r5 S-006•] 1125 5766 r6r1 6007 CORONA AVE, NUNTIN610N PARR CA ; OV 10 At 21]21.OESERt-STAR OLV LOT 25 Me 046/075 IN ACT 2529 eEN0ER66TNOF Y. --'---- _ ---- - - .= 1p96/T] AT 016-d01 621-r55.009•4 1125 6025 NO 1750 Sr00 Imon LOIN St. PALM DESERT CA 92260 _ LPt�2 6_�E_CoM6/075� T���R����11CT 2}1.4__._____ -.-•-- -- i;s1bA 014.001 621.15S-010.9 It2S SS70 HO IISO r9Sr PAY !bb Y., �1 AY SAN�hA F = 11/lr Al 74 040 ERIN ST, PALM DESERT 2CCA2y12260 • a'8j- IROP46 �7 Lii�OR�lfj NEM ("" '- ' D76S7f - D1E•001•b21•rSS•0i1-5 -11l5 4T97 TIO ' 1TSb 5666' + 1r060 ERIN ST, PALM DESERT CA 12260 = 06/72 RI AT�T2IIIFMA11r r6/079 IIANAAiCE1 � - 7i06� 0 ERIN SL P��h DESERT CA 92260 = 02112 At �e•OOf-bl1'•655=61'2.6-r - - 112T._.._-NIa7-NO'-...I?50 ]F,6R lot 29 Me 044/015 TRACT 2529 _. ------ --- --+-- -...----------- ' -- -- ` •MP - --- --i�ts1E-�S n�Pi-faii couiTv'bt `A1PfII5(Df" 6 - -- €AC€ 206 OYNERS NAME AECOAOEAS NO IRA PARCEL 10. LAND IMPAVMNTS EFEMP*IOMS NET ,AOOSESS_MAUL•I'l3ILSL11SAflL0.J__.— DA.CE,—_JlSE-_.__._...___-. OTMER[A4M W kEf TMOnAS, 6NINES IMOJEAN = OO4'ttS At 010-001 e21•A5T-817•T'+-'--iiFS" r M0 1f50 766i 14110 ERIN T. PALM DESERT CA 12260 i__.101�0_111_D961-411J.ERCL2S.it O -- - -.---- SOYEN VERY L., SOYER LINDA M. = p�j72 AtOfe-001 62l•r�JF•bIA-E .~ 1115 r621 MO 1750 r00A 1U11 ERIN III, PALM DESERT CA 12260 14oI��11�1 ll9]3 2°--- w n9 -- --oi6•bbi-�2i 43T•0TS=9 '-- s2bd - - stoo L1iIL SVG � LOAN ASSN USLit( SCYAC`S1I LOAN, S220 WILSHIRE SLYD, LOS 04/61 YY I_ANSE1 E1€ If1_3 0)6 . - - -- -- -- r.DO . /L IN 6di-1 Sw T7i'3f SFL` 1b TTS-----' - Na FOR TOTAL DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS 'Ci1N E f€ L v. bTsIft di6•b0i 62i-W-oO1•S tits 3395 AA6e' S 1I5 LEO, SallDpIE60 CALIF • OS/6e Al -LOT IfflAq,j ��6/b�SAiboif`vRLA6E-2--- �eOYI�Y OOI�fO'MT— = Ilan R1 616.001 621-rti.662.6 fits �b61 No 11SO A0A2 itl20 VELARDO O1, PALM OESERI CA 92260 _ T l�� M1fl 0�4/0}1._SNADOM r�u ACE 2 .- - - bi S6ii - o16-odl 6I1.161-00!•7LIA J. - 1125 i627 1152 14126 VELAPOO OR. PALM DESERT CA 12260 - 01171 NI I. �LL na N E.,5� SMADJW YI�LADE 2 _- �NALI]Ylll 11AL►M E., N11E'LINIL� tLbA�A - --_.. .051,6e of e-0o2 6t1•r62•oo1-e Ii 2f - As 6e N0 ttsO 3141 14041 AMP ON, PALM OESENI CA 12260 = 01/61 R] 1D1� ��y� _SM 09N1 r1L►1�6E_1.._ _ _ . . ___.. - ote•odt 621-uz 0o2=1 .-. ltis - 61io 1io tilso sets' `IMIj 1E ►A1nR�1M r h . Nt tr 012 AS1EN 000 - f LO :3'S1Ib�0]6%�E-SM Eo coNh"o'�i i�o�A�io�. d�COM�dfl GENEVRW 1'1.�- -" 015 002 6t1•A62.00]•0 112S rrot, ss31 14101 AITER 00, PALM DDESERT 1CA 12260 A 01 -1DIsi�1� /�1�_ t� t�GE I AhOEhSON MAROI = AN E Oh El A iM 1. 04 M11 O16 002 621-162.00r-1 1115 f 1r10 MO 1/50 34v1 I%it t0 AASSTTEE�R_pON, ,PPALM �ICLLIIEENNTT CClA�92260 A 01/12 At TNO�M,S CNIi11iN M•lj1MDMMt 1(AR• L L...._ __.. .122)il- .O1!•002 621.162.00S-2 - Iils u6� SSl3 SIR YILLIAMS 40, PALM 901106%, CA • 01/73 Nl , LO1 1CAN b36io MA00M VILLA6f 1—-- - - - - S1MT�MUCM J., P ar 1. _.. -- - - - , -pj�1 i1 OIS-o02 611•461.006•j 1i15 - ibri NO I1S0 sr5o' �7_/11021t_AyfTrEAN� oN, ALRs(o�tQ at }CA 122w ` '"AIIL�f��it���JACR MAA■7i bONI O � 3 ---. Ooi%ri Al OlE•002 621•r/1•o01•r tt2� 1bN MO %ISO 311%, 141126 OESEIt CA 91260 — ioi�ti Al Otl•001 611•r61.Op6.5 ITN 5160 Nb 1110 7111` 1N091 VELAN00 of, PALM OEM, CA i2i60 h1610T V LA�DO 0 , PALM OEifol CA 12160 0c;1ig NI o1S•001 61t•662•bb5 c nN not eo 1T30 16I2' lnj ,. M.,,•Q3I/021 eMAOOY NuLSyj,1_ ----- a1E•oot 6n 6i1•bid.i ..1t0 7610 No 1TSTs tEEo' S' n - HAAi115 .,•CA L., XARK15 C.F1S C. >ri 14126. ASTER 00, PALM OFSEAT CA 42260 - W �. . 10i.�R_� JIil01l..;.MAOQ�I IlLI AGE 1 101459 Ol6.001 62l•962.00t-5 ills Ts40 96 it 10 2411 XALSY H V L., NAUSY TH MARSHA K. 06/7) At 14097 VELAROD OP, PALM DESERT CA 12260 �u l�� 1V��:��61 2- - - WNW 019.001 bll•462-001-6 I115 JlOt itb i7Sb f6Al 74107 VELARDO CA, PRIM DESERT CA 12260 04.'66 RI 1.. 19L}1�M6 p]l/�.r`.>�'!Alfr�Il.11GE1_.__ -_ _--- - - - - 016•'001 e2t=1�2•u10 a 7b6 I1170-tF0 1TS6 SbAO• 'iX-A TT{ll 17-i 113 vElAAO0 AR00 OR, PALM DESERT CALIF AI L-_1DT, 95 M!1 03S/O SI SNAOON Y1li►FiL1 - _ ---- --- - -- - - MP - --� - - - -- 19Es16 ASSESSMENT ROLL COUNTI OF RIYEASIDE PAGE 201 LWMEAS NAME RECOADERS NO IRA PARCEL NO, LAND IMPRVMNTS EXEMPTIONS NET .ADneFas Melt l•1:S1ILS11 -SML=! _ _ _-_. ...._. .DATE _ .. A5E. _ - OT xER/�SSE5 - 5640 GARONER SIEPNEI E., GAAONEA FEAR E. - 03611p 016-001?621-462.O11-T -ills 1565 71,121 VELAROO OR, PALM DESERT CA 42260 04170 Al IDES OSIER 51e1AU�LO51-SHARD""AGE DESROSIEAS RGUCRtT[ ON19b4 O18-001)621-162.012.E 1I25 1925 NO 1750 4300 P 0 60Y 2". PALM DESERT, CA 01/69 Al L .01 93 M6 036:051 SNAD04 VILIAGE�- r41ER 261CK1 1NEOOW4-J.. 41ER2�1 [i bAftU�A-- -- -p9J515 -- ^16.002 621.463.601-1 i, 11l5 4144 NO 1150 3564 74130 VELAA00 OR, PALM DESERT CA 92260 = 09/66 Al I.QL 11L11e.JL1lLOS1 3yLD0M._Y11�A4L_?._. ____ __ 4997 RIIIER HAROLD, RIIIER SANDPA K. 051151 016.002 621.4E]•002.2 1125 7872 36279 CHAALESYORIN FL, CATHEDRAL CITY. CA • 0 5 /74 At L1190.YELAm-D.TL----- A --- -. - LOT 115 M6 036/OSI SHAD 04 VILLAGE NOUSE JET -SON F. ---�-- ----- -149495 - - - 01:-002�621-16J•00]-71124 - 3540 4665 P 0 S01 1176. PALM DESERT. CA • 11173 R1 - ` LOT 116 MtO0361051 SHADOU VILLAGE l IDAV ID DEAL a INCI - 101010 016-002 621-k63-004.1 1 1125 9013 513E P 0 BOY 1321, PALM DESERT CA 07172 01 _ 71171 VELARDO OR_._-.__._-..-__- - _ . _ . - I -_ . - . -__ ." ..__ . .. _ iLOT 117 MS 030151 SNADON VILLAGE 2 - - - - YERC RUSE ROEERT M., VERCAUSE CA --YN C- OOE326 6" 02,621-16]-OOS•5' 1125 ]510 NO 1750 2915 7-i190 VELAROO OR, PALM DESERT CA 12260 = 01173 Al LOT 116 Me 0191051 SMACOY VI - -- ^ 52E5 HAENA HIRAM J JRSNAENA CNONCC. 0002 21-16 -Do 6-6 2516 NEST 156TH , G"to ENA. A • 03/13 L9T 119 M5 036/OSl SNACOU VILLAC•E 2 GREEN [ENNEIH J., GREEN CLETA 0. 029649 016-002-621.46]-007-7 1125 ]619 XO 1750_ 2994 74272 VELAR00 OR, PALM RESENT CA 12260 = 03/61 Al NAnnu VILLAGE P ____ _ --_ - - - YE 6719 - NAGSTROM ELLIOIT, MAGSIROM RUTH F. P1 O1D•002-621-163-006• 1125 5191 T4251 YELAR00 OA, PALM DESERT CA 92260 = - - -_ _ nu Loci eu•nnu vn L ALE 2 9]) - -- ---- - - 6AUTtlEY JACK L., GAUTHEY DARIA A. -OH-1 016.002 621.16-i-001.1 1125 5162 6607 71121 ASTER DR. PALM DESERT CA 92260 = 07/7% RI fly - 1LLALE 1 1p t]6S - b1E-002 621-161.002-5 1125 "TTXO 1750 4J53�, CAS13LLO DOMINGO, CA TILLO AOELFA 09/?1 At ?-ills ASTER OR, PALM DESERT CA 92260 - _ YHI TE JOHN H., YH 0114 M. Tl-�2T 621.161.00 J•6� 1135r--�59�1�- ll - 71)Y, 74111 ASTER DR, PALM DESERT CA 12260 - Al ----OTE Oa3�`l1.461-004-7 �Z -� 2 MUST U L . U l 1. _ RI 71105 ASTER Bw , PALM DESERT CA 92?60 - � , JOAN T11=60TT21.161-00 /4091 ASTER , PALM DE SfeT CA 92260 - OJ/1 2 Rl M / T NA MP 1 6 ASSESSMENT ROLL COUNTY OF NEE-R S1.OL CAGE-202 IuLNEAb NAME RECORDERS NO IRA PARCEL NO. LAND 1MPRVMNTS EXEMPTIONS NET •nmExx HAn L•L-stt trtt n•a NFt=1 DATE RISE. DAVIS JOHN F., DAVIS MADGE 1. It S 1039 5164 • OD 7i�1 R1 016.002 621.464.Ob6•d` 2112 JACARANDA AVE, COSTA MESA CA A .- ♦171e MAncDID DR- LOT s9 ^R SUIO?6 SNADON VILLAGE 1 - �SEN10R ROGER t., SENIOR PAUIINE L. oiel40 - 011-002-6 2 OOT� _�12 -- 5410 NO-17S0- 1T{S; 472" MISSION OR, PALM SPAIN'S CALIF • 07/61 Al i_S12�S111�ELOLD A- LOT S6 MA 0361014 SNADOY V LLAG F[[RR cwA�iiEs R:, [EiR RoeA t. --�o7ioos-` -016=002 iii 4ii=irbi=l'-- -Isis`uoi i+o -iiso- 3661• � 131TO MARIGOLD DR, PALS DESERT CA 12260 = 04171 Al K1.E101 pp�ALtp0hi�1ENS'-I 11ILY-1 1 ----- - -bli=Oot ail-i�i-009.2 ----'i lZs -_._-iii1-No - 1150 3T79- 117700t0_RSANIGOLOC�/ORo. PALM DESERT CAA 12260 • 0.1 `MORALES EYNALDO M _PAAl 1 RiiMA --� 04f/li -- 011-002 �21•i�1.010-2- - --112f~ i111-- 5701' 12620 MARIGOLD OR, PALM DESERT CA 92240 • 01/141 R1 _ _-LOT sf Ma O76loll.-SHADOW VIL.LM-j--- --- -• -- - - - - OIA 00: 621.441.011-) -_. 11 tf U12 ^0 ITS0 3M7 YARD DOROINr L. I DOA OTHY l CAV AeAUGN. -i36so MARIGOLD DR. PALM ° R1 - i LOT S1 M/ 03610�7�SH11Oow viLili cf 1--- -- - -- ---- - - - - •-' _ - - --- Rose 1N5 CEOAGIA L. - - - -- - -- otsiii" ' - off-oo2'6t1•i61•ou•1 Isis atb s441' �A!_ outs Al 1501 ANIA AVE S/ 7, VtSIA, CA � ut7a MA/3yg,LOL----- -- _ _._ - •--P --- -- - • - -- - - - .. . _ 1 LOi S) Me OI6/016 eMADOY ViLLAiE I ►FEVER JUME C. 016:002 i21-46-4.011•S 1115 f162 HD 17SO 4531 ?112] ASTER OR, ►ALA-DESM CA f2160 • 06/if R1 •_•- S ,• V TpO RAP 1L0lC ON, FAIk CE SCP� a at.1 iCl SlP& 0)f(.Otl SMeOsr_YallaCE 1 10 �ORAIE� At YNALDO M.. AOR ALES CIPRIANA C. 045T61 016.OOi 6i1.161-010 2 1125 11T1 5301 S' 13120 MARIGOLD OR. ►AL" DESERT CA 12260 • 01/11 RI ^- IGLSS_�1.0)1/OIi SMA00W.VKLALE.I 016-002 621-161-011.3 ll2S 110 NO 1TSO 116T MARC ODRCINY L. DON CINY L CAYANAUCN. 136s0 MANIGOLD OR. PAL" = 01 Lot s• ne 036roie'I;M:om+ YRLAcE t �R 0lll Ills LE OxLIi -- - - 02S1z7 016.002 621-161.012.1 1125 1316 5111 1501 ANiA AVE SP 7, VISTA. CA • 03/75 01 ._ 3970_nA1IGOLD-M-__..__. LOT S3 Rb 036/016 SHADOW VILLAGE 1 .vEEYER DUNE C. 000735 010-002 621.161.013-S 1125 5162 NO 37SO 4537 71123 ASTER 02, PALM DESERT CA 12260 = 06ITS 01 _ _LOT s2 MA .UL0J1-StlADOW-VILLALL 1 C►AO LEN 001I�.CHANDLER OTILCA 00]/11 R1 016.002�621.165-001.7� 1125 g102 NO 1T50 37T7 ootALM 1 -I_%L11 wriANOJt_ LOT 92 MR 030/051 SHADOW VILLAGE I bt �WILSRECNT E. NDJARD. WIL6RECN1 MARGARET A. Ole-002 1-165•002.6 1125 1J►h NO 1150 2759 SHADOW "TN FAIRWY COTTAGES, PN.M RESENT CALIF • Oki 7111s YELARDO - LOT 91 ME 036/OSI SHADOW VILLAGE 2 '- -----'� OT6-bO2 fi 1.16S-00]•9— -- MYERS 6AR6ARA • RI P 0 60r 100, LA Vit Y.ELARQ0_98-ER NE CALIF A —_-__-`____ --+— — l0i 90 MD O]6/051 SHADOW VILLAGE 2 '=1ELA'R.L. N OMKAY PALM DESERT CA 9: 6�i = Ol/6T R1 P LM ADnN Y111 AGE [ - MP 197s•T6 ASSESSMENT ROIL COUNTY OF RIVfR PAGE 203 �OWENS NAME RECORDERS SO IRA PARCEL 110. LAND 0 IMlw� r� ESEMPTIONS NET t CI 1 C►"Fl 1 DATE �aF ' 6£INGARTNEK LAUKENCE l.. WEINGARTNER JEANNETIE Ole•002 621.16 s-00 •1 112s 3361 NO 1750 2759 Al V. • - -- 11 ID, PILB i rills VELARDO OR [ LOT 66 M{ 031/OS1 SHADOW VILLAGE 2 STEINNEI2 YEIMA N. OIS172 018.002 621.16 -006- - 1125 3117 MO I750 270E T1 III VELANDO OR, PAL" DESERT CALIF • 02/67 RII'll", "L161111 Let 11 N6 036/Osl SHADOW VILLAGE 2 MOLIZLEIIER CMARLES J.. NOITILEITER JULIA = O66165 R1 616.002 621.165.007-1T-� 1125 336r NO 1750 - 2759 T1215 VELAKDO OR, PAL" DESERT CA 92260 _�.__-_ MCINTYRE JERK 0. 016197 016-002 621-165.00!•� 1125 7719 NO IT50 7091 71233 VELAR00 OR, PALM DESERT CA 92260 = 02/71 1l ,� 1 7K GEE WAYNf A.. MC GEE FAYEiTA [. 013017 O •002 009-5 1125 1650 MO I1S0 le 621-US• ;225' 1142SS VELANDO ON, PAL" OE SERT 1922260 = 02/12 at LANGLEY WILLIE R., LANGLEY ELI2 ILL ASETN • OT1 R1 016-002 621•�6S•O30-s 1125 1272 NO I7S0 ]617 711 20 ASTER ON, PALM DESERT, CA A OR LOT 19 AN 03610T6 SHADOW VILLAGE 1 J - HANDY A. S. JK. HANDY LOIS 011.002 621-16s-011.6 1 1125 S925 NO 17S0 1100, T1I%O ASTER ON, PALM DESERT CA 92UO = it " 1.0401-550"13ON LOUIS J.. TMOM►SON5XIIaM PNYLLIS 016-002 621-165•012.7 1125 5010 MO liSO 1115 1 11150 ASTf% ON, PAL" DESERT CA 12260 • R1 &DOW-/ 018-002"621-465--013-1 9 112s 33{1 %501 GRACE EOGERE F.. GRACE NARY S. : R1 IK Oi AM REAL EST lAS DEPT, T11S6 ASTER 02, S' LOT 76 "1 076/051 SHADOW VILLAGE 2 -+ 016-002 621.16S•011.1 1l YS 3V3 A 1ST{ 17.I, ASTENDOK IVY LINOA • K1 0! LOT 71 N1 031/0S1 SHADOW VILLAGE 2 ' qKAPINEYfR EYERETT Y.. RAPMEYfR iAYE M. 075165 016.002�21.165•OtS•0 1t2S 7]�1 MO 1790 - 2lSt' 1 71110 ASTER 00, PALM RESENT CA 12260 = 07/61 RI NENDOIC[ N ARCHIE I., MENORIC[SEN EMAN G 0t6002 6Y1.16S•016-1 i125 _ 311 NO 1TS0� 2751 PAULINE [ $OLTY. 74210 ASTER DR. PALM Kim CA. RI LOT 61 Olt O /05t SHADOW VILLAGE 2 —3T�66t1. TRIPP MA L .. 6s•011• TRIPPP A OLYA J. = 11/73 at ' I ' 71212 ASTER 01, PALM DESERT CA 92260 1 1 SHADOW VILLAGE 2 � 1 i -Tb ASSE{Snfrt MOIL COUNlY�Oi 11M�A316E-- — PAGE 201 ' 14( 0K0fR6 NO TNA PARCEL 00. LAND IMPRVANIS EMENPTtONS NET OWNEKS NAME DU _ --. 2S' iRENCN MllllAn i., iRENCw IVA L. L 011•002 421.16�"�1�-5 1125� /V 51/0� 11 YSr ASTER 01 ' K1 sex• ANq M _._ — r --�—' --"' -'� -'-� qi. - 1115•ib ASSESSMf NT ROIL COURT; Oi AIYERSI�f; _ PALE 20T OWNERS NAME RECORDERS NO TPA PARCEL 10. LAND IRPIVMNTS fKfIvIlON3 NET nti tt ilk., t. a tAKI LA-1— - --CITE uer_ _ • ^ -OIIIE2JA11ES., 1150 401AN CATHOLIC BISHOP O7 Saw OlEGO 016.0D7 621 1T1.001.7 1150 SACRED MEAtl CHURCH. 60, 116. PAIR DESERT t1 . LS6 RCtfS R/l 1R POR S. 1" 01 SEC 16 145 RbE i0t TO1 AL OESCtIPTION SEE ASSf w at t----- --- J6os6 MICHAEL M., MANGADQ%%A LOUIS N. 017601� Ol6-OOZ 621.171.001-9 --� 1123 --- S02S Joe" SUSANA AVENUE. 10NRANCE CALIF • 01172 Al -- __ LOT 22 MS OSO/016 TRAIT 21t2 i .M ••n CLAIR VICTOR D.. CLAIR LONEITA S. 015912 016-00?-a 1.111.00S-0 IIIS SOTS NO 050 714210 Est% %I, PALM DESERT CA 92260 02/72 At SWENSON EUGENE A. 017901 016-0024621-111-006.1 + _. 1125 S$35 6660 T1100 ERIN, PALM DESERT CA 92Z60 = 02/12 Al -_ SYANSOR JARES H.. SWANSON JEAN M. O3t561 016-002621.171•OOl-2 1125 5025 6150 t17 TOPAZ CIRCLE. PALM SPRINGS CALIF 03172 Al 1Fell, kT A-- -' - -- -_-- - LOT 2S R6 OSO/06t TRACT 2162 ' 6210 BOSS MICHAEL ft., 6001 DONNA J., MARLADONNA ---i11191 016-OO2i6Tl•I1]-006•J 1125 �5065 LOUIS M., MRRGAOONNA MAIGAIEI M. 06/11 tl -`,_._ - ___ ,___• e..c•r♦ -v. Tell•arc u ---------�--- 74340 111% ST A LOT 26 R6 OSO/os6 TRACT 2162ARNOLD NENNETN E.. ARNOlO LEY EALY 1. 1291T/ 016.002 621.111.009.1I 1125 1115 NO 1750 4010 7V60 ERIN ST. PALM DESERT to 92260 = 11/71 RI �--- SMITH SHARON 9. 017001 016.002.621.411-010-I1 1125 5715 6S10 71360 toll $7, PALM DESERT CA 92260 - OZ/13 11 Soso MICHAEL A., MARGAOONNA LOUIS N. 012066 016.OOZ 621-1/1-011•S^ 112S 5025 6150' 23616 SUSANA AVENUE, TORRANCE CALIF • 01/12 At ^ —j Lot 29 MB 050/066 TRACT 2162 1 IUCRSOORF SHIPLEY F., 6NOY1 SHIOLEY I. 16SS92 016-OC2-621-101.012-6 1125 1615 5620 77.101 CALIFORNIA APT 0-16, PALM DESERT CALIF 12/72 RI + LOT 30 N6 0501066 TRACT 2462 i POPE ROBERT E. JR. POPE MARY 0. 0570- 016.002 621-171-013.1 112S 5110 623S' P 0 601 1605. INDIO, CA • OS/73 I1 LOT 31 M1 050 /066 TRACT 2162 ., ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF S D 066071 016-002 I'll-"1-011.6 + 1000 5500 6500 SACREO HEART CHURCH, BOI 996. PALM DESERT CALIF- 06/66 C1 „ J Loy 32 M6 050/066 TRACT 2162 "P 191S•76 ASSESSMENT NOLL COUNTY Oi RIVERSIDE PAGE 20I 1 OWNERS NAME RECORDERS NO IRA PARCEL NO. LAND IMPNVMNTS EIEMPTIONS NET _ ellE t.et Ot11c t/•c lte W ILLS VIVIAI L. 101123 O1B-00T 6T1.171.O1S•9 1125 69o2 No 1730 ST71� T70 FLORIBE AVE, PALM DESERT CA 92260 = 10166 RI STAIES NAIL 6ANI OF OR Tt, MORGAN LNAHAR OBS317 O1 B-OOT bT1-171.016-0 1I2S SS 70 669Si J. 71, SOUTHER SET I 2. TN t 06/73 Al III131t0 FLONINE AVE A LOT 31 NS 050/066 TRACT 2162 RORA% CATHOLIC BISHOP OF San DIEGO 022430 01B•002 621.471.01 1•1 1f00PP 1�tis CM 3SJOS 19220 SACRED HEART CMURCM, 10R 194, PALM DESERT CA 03170 C1 - 1.A5 ACRES N/L It POR SY 1/4 OF SEC 16 IS$ r , *At FOR TOTIL DESCRI►ilot SEE ASSESSORSInapt WAYK RICMAEI G.. YAYNE LINDA 0. • 0205611 Al Olt•002 621.112.001 9 , 112S 1f5S NO 1TSO 4030 71261 ERIN St. PALM OESENT CA 92260 CN01111E1L OEII S. 3R0, CSORWEILLJULIE R. 016151 its.002.621.1T2.002.0 �-ills S250 HO 1750 1625 141281 ERIN ST, PALM DESERT CA 12240 • 07171 at I INIE1111ER CeA31 01"P! W11 IERu tJ ill R. _ iSS1/9 01102 621.17201.1 II2S 5070 NO 1740 11_05• 11301 ERIS $1, PALM DESERT CA 92260 • 11/73 RI OSULLIVAN JOANVE 6. 06T351 O15.002 621.172.001•P 1125 S030 HO ITSO 110s 14321 E t§ $1, PALM DESERT CA 92260 • O6/T1 TI1 SILVER SAMUEL, SILVER SEITMA R. Osl0S2 011.002 621.172.00S-3 I 111$ µSS N0 1710 10l0 74111 ERIN it, PALM DESERT CA 921 60 • 01ITS at LOT +T wa eAn/eu 16AL tut +---- - ' +-- - NOtEIT6 EENNf iM Y.. ROBERTS LYNNE L. 01lilt tl 014-002 btl•Y12.006.1 11Ts ---SOTS NO 11SO NTO: P 0 tax 1504, PALM 0E6EN7. CA _ ___-_.__ �- J___--_---. - --_ _- _ -_-- . Loy 16 NJ OSO/OIS iNACT 2102 CHAVEZ ERNESTO, CHAVEZ SILVIA • 005/11_ --.-�� '015.00P •21.111.001.3 ills - --S010 HO 1TSO 1qS 1RIt1 ENII $1, PALM OE6EI1 CA 92160 _u A16 tl•PT tt -- ..._ _ 6 f I1ZGfRAlO YIL6UN J.. FITZGENALO NAllsoof 001„� NI 011•002 6l1.1Tt•001.6 1125- S4 t0Am14 !AO VELAI00 01, PALM OESENt CALIF toy I AS 050/08S TRACT 2462 uA.-M e.,•tA o . MANIFS SFITY A. O1N12-^ -- 014.002 ♦21•r12.009.7 112f� -• SS10 NO 17SO 1YV5 7■3a1 EAIR ST, IA,M Ca SLP+ LA i... Lr+i 1Lf�L30[011 I[ALI 29A2 r -P Caf RtS Rf NNf TN r.. 001ERTS LYRAE L. 011106 716-C32 itl vi-5J•-r t17S 5095 N0 1150 •i 70 /.14" P 0 {CI 1501, AOLM OESENI. CA Ot/T2 al t , 1■u+ tat■ at _ _ - � LOT 16 MS OSO/Olt TRACT tt{t CHAVEZ ERNE STO, CNAVE2 SILVSA 01t112 010-002 621.1TT-001.5 1125 5040 u0 I/S0 1119 71111 ERIN $I, PALM DESERT CA 12160 • 01171 01 .na +t ft ncwou juti.-zui--. - 6615 FITZGERALD MILRUR J., Fll?;ERALO MARIANNE 0/1111 OlA-002 621-r7t-00 S-6 1125 SS 70 71 260 VELANOO Oa, PALM DESERT CALIF • Oa/61 at LOT R MI OSO/061 to Act 2112 O RSb. O1S•002 621.1Tt•009.1 1125 SS 10 NO 1750 1115 HAWKER OLIVER E.. NaaNfR IETTY A. -- - - - - _-+ 06/66 R1 74260 VEUR00 DR. PALM OESERT CA 12t60 —LD7 11 MA 0tn,ela tort 2t12 _ - -- - 1115� MC MULLIN JOSEPH J.- RC MULLIS RUTM M. • 110/T2 R1 016-002•621.112.010•i 11tS SSTO NO 17 SO TU00 VELARDO OR, PALM DESERT CA 12260 OAIE ELOON 1. JR, NI' JAr15 R, 021213 - --- Of 6.002�621-172.011.E ]12S 6320 NO 1i50 Sims {0) 1115, PALM DESERT. CA 03166 Al - - LOT 11 MS OSO/064 TRACT 211Z SANialA ROIER7 L.. SANI AIa PaMELA N. 03f 279 016.002.621-112.012-9 11tS 6-56�M0 17�0 SiSt 73310 VELANDO OR, PALM DESERT CA 12260 - 03/1S Rl , - 11 S-7a ASSESSME MI ROIL COUNTv OF AIYEIiSt - --- PAGE 201 OWNERS NAME RECORDERS MO IRA PARCEL NO. LAND IMPAVMN, EIEMPTIONS NET DtNEI/ _--- 1115 R A1TN C., MOAA GaYLA R. 01 � - 6717 016.002.621.171 I1tS SS70 NO 1/S0 IS Y1)60 YE1A100 01. ♦ALM Of SER1 CA 12260 + 07171 Al - COUI� JO}E►N R.. COUTE PNr``ltt A. = 135645 NI O1h 00T 621.172.011.1 1 1125 SS 70 M0�1 iS0 zt1S 71] 0 V LA DO OR, PALM DESER CA 1t 260 .nt _ Na nt-fell hart lta2 - 1115 SEMUNO EUGENt M. + 0o`61T4 R1 016.002 621-16i•001.7 ' t12S 5570 NO 1150 712►1 VELARDO at, 0SLM DESER/ CA 12260 1 _ •1011145 CALVIN. UA111NS MARILYN OITL11 O1{•002 621.161.002.E 1 11tS 6Y10 NO 1750 6065 tt2{1 YELANDO 01, PALM OESE1t CA 12260 + 02/72 R1 .nt ♦ Ma """6' 71arT 2tA2 ---+--- �e.,110N UILLIAM 1.. ANOfRSN OORENE A. 101262 Otl•OOt 1125 6512 MO liSO 5667 621.1E1-00)•1 71301 VELARDO OR, PALM OESENT CA 12260 • 11:66 R1 'aOUIIASSA LYLE A., a0U1 ASSA ORAL L. 01652 0" 002.621-161.001.0- 1125 SS70 VE 6�95 11321 VELA100 ON. PALM DESERT CA 12260 • 03/71 R1 N. 05102E 016.002 621.161.005-1 1125 6625 NO 1150 {DYER DISMON 1000 7qU VELAROO ON, PALM DESERT CA 1Z260 • OT/lt al et a a et ieaa oar, +••• --- --- - 4UnE LYLE a.. SIMtE ARLENE L. • 004/66 Rl 016.00t 621.161.006-2 1125 5570 NO tT50 1915 P 0 SOY ZIS. PALM DESERT. CA art ANnO (I - —J --- LOT 2 MS OSO/066 TRACI 2162 �NOFfMAN MEgERT E.. NOfiMAN DE ANA + 112%N — RI 01S-002 621.151-001.3 1125 612t NO 1750 S719 7181 VELANDO DR, PRIM DESERT CA 92260 nT t M. nSO/ ■ 12A" 21af --- I`JEFfERY iM011R5 l.. JEffERr MAa Il YN : 110/TI Nl 016.002 621-181.001•t . ll2S qTT NO 1750 ]iS T1260 ASTER ON, PALM DESERT CA 92260 ---— .nr to ra n■c e■a nary 2303 1613 ITa UE ROSA 011111 015-002 621.151.009-5 1125 31a6 iVIA. 10 AfTE1 DRIVE, PALM DESERT CALIF • 02/72 R1 - ♦.2y� Aerta na a b?4 OT 13 MS 01S/01s TRACT 2S0S -I EOYIN R.. GUNT PETRA 0111/1 01/-002 621-1S1-010-5 1125 3670 NO 1750 3015; 00 ASTER OR. PALM DESERT CA 12260 • OE/70 at•gyp ■ hart iSOS IsURi if SILLY I., SLMIIS GLORIA A. 12211t 016-002 421.461-011-6 112S 351-1 NO 1 ' 14320 A$1f@ Do, ►Alm DESERT CA 12260 + 01/71 - N1 NEDd{1S011 ELIZASETN T. 039329 016-002 621.161.012-7 112S 1122 NO ITSO 11tTj 0 sot 611, PALM DESERT. CA • 01/61 R1 LOT 16 M 01S/016 TRACT ZSOS MSOTT [ESNETN Y., A{SOtT AAA CARET A. 13055E 019.002 621.161.013.1 1125 SI60 NO RSO S3SSi 7 A)60 ASTEN 00, PALM DESERT CA 12260 • 1 /6r RI 106363 010-002 621-1a1-011.9 1125 1061 S20a N7..1LAA SCIA1D0.UFALMi 0ESf1 T C�NR[E T1A • 10/i^ Al LOT 1/ MS 01S/011 TRACT SOS I 111S•/6 ASSESSRENI ROLL COUNIY OF RIVERSlOE ►Ai[ Y10 ow.11 SAME WOODEN$ N0 IRA PEACE N0. LAND IMRVMN/3 tl[MitON■ 1{E1 etNft[1S[t[• SEIU MApEIINE t. 116391 016.002 it1•tl?-001.0 Ill$ 3S1) NO 1TSO 306' 11261 ASIE1 01. PALM DESERT CA 92260 • 12/69 RI f _- +L Is G. olooio O11 0o1 6zl•t 1.001.1 ills 367o sits' 61ESLfV DOROTHY Y. . 10060 Rl 2021 LONGVIEW 41, CORONA CA ----- _- -- - —- -. ►a+ tan w• ----f i LOT 1C M 00/016 TRACT ?SOS _ _ 1111 L SGU£ SAY 10 [., LOGUE a1ElpA J. 15/0)T 01{•OOi itl-1/?•00)•2- lltf - 319Y P 0 {01 It U. ♦ALM DISEST. CA • 1!/11 Al l01 9 Mt 01S/Owl 1RACT 2sos -. __-- ___ .._-._._ ____ ... ...'.•�-ne a.r tt2t Sat) NU 1150 S141� PROOF OF PUBLICATION This spa,,e is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA� SS. County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above Proof of Publication of entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- Legal Notce .Case No.. TT 8237 lation, published weekly, in Palm Desert, County of --------------------------------------------------------------- Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, ---------------------—--------=----------------------------—----------------- under date of October 5, 1964, Case Number 83658; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of — -- — —-------------------------------------------------- said newspaper and riot in any supplement thereof on Paste clipping the following dates to wit: of NoticeSECURELY In This Space LEGALNOTICE1� CITY OF PALM DESERT 7 9/3 0 A TENTATIVE SUBDI VISIpN MAP OF let S1 NGLE-FAMILY ---------------------------'---------------------------- LOTS O_ NUACRESSITUATEDINTHER-I-9,MZONE STRICT AS ----------------------- f 1 r single-family that 1a ft acres and situated In the Notice•is hereby given that a PubIlc.He8237 arIng will be held bed I` fore the Palen sert City Council to consider a Tentative Subdl- vision Map o ng R-1-9,000 Zone District,located sou of Magnesle Falls Orly e ex- -____-_______________-_________ tended and west of Deep Canyon Road extended. �� ys I certify (or declare) under penalty or perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. ^° 7, �.... .,.. '...• f06 — — -------------- ., Si nature � j t_�f.'. l� � `be.held•on October 14 WK6, asaid Public Hearing wt 7:17 00 Date - -9!3 -- -- — — -- 197__b p�aiccelcletIn tl ntCWL Gncil CAIairn J�lD r�n hambers fri'the alifornHend rnbettieard nil ed at Palm Desert, California ated:September 2ested 7 976 SHEILA R.G Ailing City Clerk . POP-9/30t1' PROOF OF PUBLICATION `47 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-06H RECEIVED Date: September 27; 1976 01_7 - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CITY of PALM DESERT A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION 1111IP OF 13' SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 54 ACRES SITUATED IN THE R-1-9,000 ZONE DISTRICT CASE NO. TT 8237 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a. Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Tentative Subdivision Map of 182 single-family lots on 54 acres and situated in the R- 1-9,000 Zone District, located south of Magnesia Falls Drive ex- tended and west of Deep Canyon Road extended. Y rf ! rrs, COM Al UNITY e PARK ' 1 - e. < 1 � d DCS C.hT^ STAh UGUd 4. Nis i i SAID Public Hearing will be held on October 14, 1976, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert', California, at which time and place, all in- terested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN ACTING CITY CLERK PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post September 30, 1976 s� U.S.P0SiAGE SEP27'7E 4s AQ !K 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 cr 1 x C P3.a3a`i`saL��l: 'TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 RETURN T.n DER ALkF t ® Cbcile W. Von S_eggern 74-1U r_ �5"Dese�` -, o m esert, CA. 92260NL Qv� 1 Rv�cEs RONMEQp�M p�gERt /2of 'E�.rt O� ffere `y K U.S.POSiAGE�% � SEPz77E 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 tL 1t �• ! a �«� TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 Cq�1F �T(.JpN' T ,Awrence F. & Lynn A. Harrison 1g) F� 4-160 Dese t Star Blvd. ln Desert, CA. 92260 0 '� 7SP�SES�R�S 0`ENO.0 �E 7' .a o 9 I a SEP2776�O i « 45-275 PRICKLY PEAWLANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 / pp c TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 Cq�\F f U.d96r19. C� ,I �}'am D. Linda L. Richardson 74-120 De ert Star Blvd. hQ�Palm DX&,—j lk. 92260 CNMENSA\' gESERts �,a F eP�M c^ °IJ.S.POSTAG ��t�� off 5- Lrl„ , ��s�s® REf(�2r, ,-; ., Q ' s .��III i< SEP27'76 y�'�ley I K 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 ���-r r n ! y 1 3 x ' P. MEi I Ix TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 No ALi �'6.�5G!93� x A, A� p/.�, I fiV' n L },._' �. " ✓A,?`Z) sj Flor/Dert, rmes ® �® 74-0 rive ;> PalmA. 92260 r ' OCI 71 v ^ ENVIRONMEN7A1 SERVICES C1TY OF PAEM DESERT t De �J1LlS9 OO .__ _ Y R 1 d SEP27'76 ~�� .! IR 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 A / = 13 R CA0 • ppp MfiEP R TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 f "' f.U.898f?3� K k d_.C,arol _J. Miller �,, Harold Ae .. 74-024 Ve ar.do Drive Palm Des rt, CA. 92260 (U$qW- (MO IT'E .n„rn, 1�>=3�ua{� .�`V ��r{"�,(U.S.POSTA n � 0- SEP27'76 y!' , 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 t' �j' i 3 TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 Cq( I� f U.838193 R�UR ` , N ro SIN©FR NO James/, 'C M. Summers 74-.04 14 Palm 226� OOAQ ' S.PUSIAGEI- 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 pp 1 3TELEPHONE(714) 346-061) U.82H'93�� Ta NET 3- � Michael a Linda Wayne A�.4 � Palm61 sert,SCA. 92260 peso` ' ,.11 J S.POS JUST AG K a SEP27'76 y�� � i 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, AIM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 , 1 3a ^^ppMETER' K TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 /`+� /1 rL;B°�193� F�� ✓" Olt William d- ua French 74-254 A ter Drive Palm De rt, CA. 92260 U.S.PI-- OSTAGPj� a SEP27'76 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 ( 3 L1 K CA1 l`G pp MFi EF �K TELEPHONE(714) 346-0 0(JRN r0 f.U.99Ei9?I{ N _ K S��'�FIQ nr r. 4a Ross A. D 74-018 lardo Drive Palm.. sert, CA. 92260 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA 92260 `` ' 3 Cg11�' NErER x TELEPHONE(714) 34 �M L PB.833!9i iK Nor Char/A. d ne Forteza 74-1 .Bl.ud.o Palm2260 U.S.POSiAG�; (Uftgw (O a° E:Ien -rat � sEP27'76 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 oq��F pMETER « TELEPHONE(TI4) 3467-061(� ICtj URN Pp SIND R Nor':!�t �' UNA Robert_E. a/-ancWalker ''V74-180 Deseevard Palm Deser , CA. 92260 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 / P'tl99NI f R�URM Tp SNor �N� ER UPf et T �t'c Tillie M" chel l 74-110 esert Star Blvd. ''�st�p Palm sert, CA. 92260 �$ �ff ���®z es33'" � U.S.POSIAGE a SEP27'76�� ��« r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 I « 3 « CALIF l'.11�pp.ne,ER 1 x I 'TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 838193 F''(E ?tA� ?rr � Samul a and 6 rtha Silver74-341 Eri Street E ►��CeT Dot, j Palm Des " �`; A:--922ED 0.` iVA�L� O FOR WARP a RErUpiv d SEP2776 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 No] , � I 1 3:"!"1.,", 1 IT I I 't TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 (It,,At t ��,DR TELEPHONE Cq0� fL.99Pt93 '� Q F(�R q"VARO Thomas and Imojean Gaines 74-110 Erin St. Palm Desert, CA. 92260 SEp , sokoceS EN�IRO AMet4 M DESERT CITYOf P t a^•�N I ,t•"' _ ; 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE September 15, 1976 APPLICANT_ U. S. Life Savings. and Loan Association 5220 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90036 Attn: Joseph Hall CASE NO. TT 8237 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of September 14, 1976 CONTINUED TO DENIED xxx APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 178 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. xxx PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Octobe'r.14; 1976' FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services , City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS , Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission C Applicant ! (7�xus�aXxSacxbt�z�cx)��;��cu�c� owim Frank Goodman I Don Shayler 1 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DATE: : August 17, 1976 LEGAL NOTICE CITY of PALM DESERT A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP OF 185 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 54 ACRES SITUATED IN THE R-1-9,000 ZONE DISTRICT. CASE NO. TT 8237 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing w.ill. be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Tentative Sub- division Map of 185 single-family- lots on 54 acres and situated in the• R-1-9-,000 Zone District, located south .of Magpesia_ Falls__, Drive extended and west of Deep Canyon Road extended. 1` CNANN9-k Et p' COMMUNITY ;W PARK ` .- 4. .: r' E� DESERT STAR SDD I " vr, W�Im TT,; QP SAID.Public Hearing will be held on August 31.,. 1976 at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall., 45.-275 Pric4;l,,/ Pear Lana, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post-August 19, 1976 4. Page 8, paragraph 4, omit the last sentence, "Motion unanimously carried. " and insert the following: The motion carried with the following vote: AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Mills, Van de Mark NOES: None ABSTAIN: Wilson 5. Page 9, insert the following sentence after the 5th paragraph: "Chairman Wilson advised Ms. Huntington that there would only be one-story buildings around the perimeter of the location. " 6. Page 10, Chairman Wilson requested that the second and third paragraphs be transposed. 7. Page 10, paragraph 6, omit the last sentence, motion unanimously carried." and insert the following: "The motion carried.with the following vote: AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Mills, Van de Mark NOES: None ABSTAIN: Wilson A motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, to ap- prove the minutes, as corrected, of the August 31, 1976 meeting was unanimously carried. VI. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Letter from Mrs. Fred Lande requesting for a determination of whether a Foster Home for 3 to 4 children would be allowed in the R-1 Zone District. Mr. Williams reviewed the above letter with the Commission. His report to the Commission also included a draft letter to be sent to Mrs. Lande advising her of the Commission's findings. A short discussion ensued between the Commission and staff, which included a clarification of the definition of a "family" according to the Zoning Ordi- nance. The general consensus of the Commission seemed to be that a limit of 3 children would be allowable. A minute motion by Commissioner Mills, seconded by Commissioner Van de Mark, to instruct Mr. Williams to send a revised letter to Mrs. Lande indicating the Commissioner's decision regarding the limitation of 3 children, was unanimously carried. VII . PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Wilson explained the Public Hearing procedures to the members of the audience. A. CONTINUED CASE NO. TRACT 8237 - U. S. LIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION Consideration of a Tentative Map for a single-family residential subdivi- sion on 54.5 acres of land located east of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater River Storm Channel , and west of Deep Canyon Road. Mr. Williams began his presentation by stating that this case had been con- tinued from the August 31, 1976 Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Williams presented a letter to the Commission from the Desert Sands Unified School District. Said letter contained the following requests regarding the new subdivision. "1. Request additional street or Pedestrian walkway be required. Pedestrian access between the two schools and many of the proposed residences, especially in the southeast portion of the tract, will be difficult and must be by excessively long and circuitous routes unless a street or pedestrian walkway is provided connecting Rutledge Avenue and Desert Star Blvd. at a location such as through Lots 17 and 34 or adjoining lots to the east. Our experience has been that children will seek "short cuts" in the absence of streets or walkways in such circumstances which could cause trouble for property owners along both Desert Star and Rutledge." 14, 1976 Page 2 "2. Request that view obscuring wall be provided. It is requested that the developer provide a view obscuring wall on the west property line between the proposed tract and the school dis- trict property adjoining (west side of Lots 177 to 185) for the pur- pose of restricting access to and from the school property through private residential properties. The added benefit of increased privacy to home owners is significant. If a block wall cannot be provided, a chain link fence with decorative landscape screening is recommended as a minimum acceptable substitute." Mr. Williams stated that staff believed the School District's concerns had been adequately addressed with the revision of the tract map., Mr. Williams further explained that since the last Commission meeting of August 31st, the staff had met on several occasions with the applicant and his engineer. There were also meetings with the staff and the residents of the area. The result of those meetings is a revised Tentative Tract Map which resolves many of the concerns that the City Engineer, the Planning staff, and the citizens had with the subdivision. A lengthy discussion ensued covering the following issues: A list of items that have been resolved. Proposed community facilities dedication Improvement of Rutledge Way and Magnesia Falls Drive adjacent to the proposed Park site. Drainage Sidewalks Desert Star Boulevard Extension The benefits of the proposed subdivision were also discussed. They are as follows: Completion of circulation system in the area Provides the potential for reasonable priced housing Resolves an existing drainage problem Provides alternatives for safe and direct access to the Middle School and Community Park complex Increases an existing Park area Mr. Williams further explained that the Conditions of Approval were self- explanatory and conformed to the existing revised map. He stated that staff o ti recommended Planning Commission adoption of Resolution No. 178, forwarding z the Tentative Tract Map to the City Council for consideration. w ¢ n Commissioner Kelly questioned .the wording on Condition of Approval No. 6. U w Hunter Cook explained that the second sentence of Condition No. 6, which reads ? as follows, should be omitted due to the fact that it was a part of the original conditions: ` 0 6. Developer shall provide 5' wide P.C.C. sidewalks on both sides of w all interior streets, as required by the City Engineer. Sidewalk zmay be omitted on Primrose Lane between Erin Street and the cul-de- sacs. w There was a lengthy discussion concerning the access problems on Deep Canyon 0 1 Road. Commissioner Berkey was extremely concerned about this situation. z_ Hunter Cook explained the right-of-way concept with reference to Deep Canyon Road. Commissioner Kelly wanted to know why a condition for street lights within the subdivision had been eliminated. September 14 , I976 Page 3 ' Mr. Williams explained that the City Council has not established a policy 4 for street lights as yet. 0 Mr. Cook felt that a definite policy for street lights should be established. Q He stated that if a street light policy was established, there were two major v� intersections within the subdivision that should have signals. These inter- ? \ sections are Deep Canyon Road and Magnesia Falls Drive and "F" Street and z Rutledge Way. Commissioner Van de Mark felt that a street light should be installed at the intersection of Rutledge Way and Portola Avenue. Mr. Cook agreed that that intersection should have a street light but it was not as much a part of the subdivision. Mr. Williams stated that the real issue with regards to street lights was not who .was going to install them but rather the on-going costs of street lights and a determination of the level of street lights. Chairman Wilson asked if the applicant was present. FRANK GOODMAN, 73-655 Shadow Mountain Drive, spoke to the Commission regarding the subdivision. Mr. Goodman stressed the fact that there had been a good number of hours spent in working with staff on the revision of the Tentative Tract Map. He stated that the layout of the streets had been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. He further stated that cooperation was excellent from all staff members that were involved. He also stated that he had generally agreed with all the requests of the staff; but that there were one or two matters of principal that he would like to discuss. The first major problem was the problem. of dedication of property for the Community Park. The second major problem was the requirement for the instal- lation of sidewalks. Mr. Goodman requested that the subdivider only be re- quired to install sidewalks on "F" and "A" Streets and Rutledge Way rather than the entire subdivision. Mr. Goodman again stated that he would accept all of the terms and conditions other than the park dedication condition and the sidewalk condition. DON SHAYLER, 73-893 Highway 111 (Engineer for the project) spoke to the Com- mission on the more technical aspects of the project. Mr. Shayler requested a re-write of Condition No. 12, which reads as follows: 12. The section of Desert Star Boulevard between the existing improve- ments and "F" Street shall be constructed as a pedestrian and bicycle way. The existing improvement shall be curbed as necessary to exclude through traffic at this time. The unimproved portion of the right-of way shall be landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Hunter Cook felt that the condition as written was adequate and did not present any problems. Chairman Wilson stated at this time the Commission would take any input in favor of the proposed subdivision. DALE MEAD, 74-161 Desert Star Boulevard, spoke to the Commission with reference to the traffic problems on Desert Star Boulevard. He had no opposition to the subdivision, his only concern was that Desert Star Boulevard should not go through. ART BENDER, 74-020 Desert Star Boulevard, stated he was in favor of the revised map as presented and that it had been a pleasure working with the staff. l VICTOR CLARK, 74-280 Erin Street, stated he was basically in favor of the revised map. Mr. Clark further stated he supported staff's condition re- garding dedication. He also stated that Deep Canyon Road should be considered as a prime entrance and exit route for the development. DIANE MEAD, 74-161 Desert Star Boulevard, spoke to the Commission with regards to the access problem on Desert Star Boulevard. Chairman Wilson explained to Mrs. Mead that the intent was to block off Desert Star at this time but keep the option open for future years. Sept- ';nr 14 , 1976 age RONDI SALTER, 74-010 Desert Star Boulevard spoke to the Commission in favor of the project. KENNETH ARNOLD, 74-360 Erin Street, spoke to the Commission in favor of the project. He also requested that the developer consider the drainage problem at the end of Florine Street. Being no further comments either. in favor of or opposed to the project, Chairman Wilson closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Wilson stated he was pleased with the amount of work that had been done with reference to the map revision and he was also pleased with the spirit of cooperation between the staff, the developer, and the citizens. Chairman Wilson then stated that there seemed to be two major issues for discussion at this time. The first issue dealing with the dedication of the lots west of Rutledge Way and the second issue dealing with sidewalks through- out the subdivision. Commissioner Berkey felt that the developer should dedicate the area west of Ruteldge Way .for an extension of the existing park facilities and also that the developer should only be responsible for development of the east half of the street. On the sidewalk issue, Commissioner.Berkey felt that even though there wasn't a firm policy relating to sidewalks, sidewalks should be installed throughout the subdivision. Commissioner Van de Mark agreed with Commissioner Berkey. Commissioner Kelly was in favor of sidewalks throughout the development. She also supported Commissioner Berkey's feeling that the developer should dedicate the area west of Rutledge Way for an extension of .the existing park facilities and the concept of not requiring the developer to improve the west half of Rutledge Way adjacent to the park. At this point, Mr. Williams explained in detail the fact that the matter of the park dedication and whether Rutledge Way were to be improved full width were two separate issues. He indicated strongly that Rutledge Way full im- provement was essential for good circulation in the subdivision. Commissioner Berkey agreed that these were separate issues and it was the con- sensus of the Commission that the developer should fully improve Rutledge Way adjacent to the Park, except for sidewalks on the west side. Chairman Wilson stated that the Commission seemed to be in agreement on both issues, unless the City Council overrides the Commission. Chairman Wilson also stated that he was also in favor of the developer dedicating the area west of Rutledge Way and having a requirement for the installation of side- walks throughout the subdivision. There was a short discussion regarding the issue of widening Deep Canyon Road. All the Commissioners agreed that Deep Canyon Road was going to be a very important access point. 0 o Chairman Wilson then asked for a consensus of opinion regarding the park w dedication. c w \ Commissioner Kelly asked if there was any of getting the full 2.7 acres. _z Mr. Williams pointed out the alternatives on the map. 4 Commissioner Berkey requested additional input from the developer. Chairman Wilson reopened the Public Hearing. Frank Goodman spoke to the Commission regarding the hardship that would be caused on the developer if the entire 2.7 acres were dedicated. The dedi- cation of the full 2.7 acres would require the replacement of an entire water main and laterals which he had participated in its construction on the premise that Rutledge Way would not be moved. Chairman Wilson closed the Public Hearing. September 14, 1.976 Page 5 F ioner Van de Mark moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution , with the property west of Rutledge Way being dedicated to the park remaining be accepted a$ lieu monies; the deletion of the second e under Condition No. 6, and the correction to Condition No. 13; also ding changes recommended by staff regarding the second page of the ion (changing Lots 177-185 to read: the area west of Rutledge Way )). Commissioner Berkey seconded the motion. Chairman Wilson asked e was any further discussion on the matter. ioner Kelly stated that she was not satisfied with the park dedication arrangement, in terms of not getting the full 2.7 acres and also the width of Deep Canyon Road, south of the subdivision. Chairman Wilson explained that Condition No. 4 spelled out the.20, access on Deep Canyon, south of the subdivision. Commissioner Kelly stated that she wanted the park to be the full 2.7 acres and she also wanted Deep Canyon Road to be developed to a full width of 32' , south of the subdivision. The motion was carried with the following vote: AYES: Berkey, Mills, Van de Mark, Wilson NOES: Kelly Chairman Wilson called a brief recess at 8:38 pm. The meeting was reconvened at 8:50 pm. VIII. ' OLD BUSINESS A. DISCUSSION OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE COLLEGE OF THE DESERT AREA - 1. Preliminary Circulation Plan for Various Blocks. Mr. Williams explained that this item was under the Old Business section of the agenda due to the fact that the history of,the C.O.D. area had already been presented to the Commission. Further, at the next study session meeting, the Commission would receive a report from the staff containing comments from other agencies pertaining to the C.O.D. Specific Plan, Mr. Williams then discussed the General Project Area Concerns with the Commission. A Sub-Area Analysis was discussed which included 5 sub-areas as follows: The Palm Del Block (north of 44th, from Highway Ill to Monterey) The C.O.D. Block (north of 44th, from Monterey to Portola) The Deep Canyon Block (north of 44th, from Portola to Cook) The Palma Village #12 Block (south of 44th, from Monterey to San Pablo) The Palm Vista Block (south of 44th, from Monterey to Fairhaven) Slides of the major streets in the above areas were shown to the Com- mission. Mr. Williams stated that the most important predominant feature of the area would be the area of 44th Avenue and Monterey Avenue. Sam Freed explained that all the figures used pertaining to the average daily traffic volume were taken from 1973 Riverside County Traffic Rec- ords. Chairman Wilson was concerned with the gigantic area that was involved and the amount of time it would take to discuss this. Scpt.ei.;cr 14, 1976 Page September 9, 1976 CITY of PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Case No. : TRACT NO. 8237 Applicant: U. S. LIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION I. REQUEST: That approval .be granted for a :., I lot subdivision on property located easterly of Portola Avenue, northerly of 44th Avenue (attached vicinity map). II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission, by Resolution No. 178. :, .recommend approval of the Tentative Map to the City Council , subject to conditions. Justification for this approval -is based upon the following facts: 1) the proposed map is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan 2) the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision as modified,by the recommended conditions will be consistent with the General Plan 3) the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed 4) the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the development 5) the design of the subdivision as amended by the recommended conditions and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially endanger any wildlife or their habitat;, 6) the design of the proposed-subdivision and the related improvements are not likely to cause serious health problems III. BACKGROUND: A. Tract Size: 54 Acres B. Proposed Lots: 182 C. Zoning: R-1-9,000 D. Adjacent Zoning: North S, and O.S. South - R-1-9,000 East PR-5, N, and O.S.N. West - P and S E. Environmental Finding: Staff has determined this project to be environmentally significant and an Environmental Impactt-_Repo_rt .}.as__ been developed and is awaiting cons id ration by the City Council . F. Effect .of New Subdivision Ordinance: The owner of the property has agreed to conform to all the requirements of the new Subdivision Ordinance by a letter dated July 2, 1976. -1- Staff Report Tract No. 8237 September 9, 1976 IV. DISCUSSION OF .ISSUES: A. Introduction - Since the continuance of .the Public Hearing on Tract No. 8237, w ich occurred at the .regularly scheduled Commission meeting of August 31, 1976, the staff has met on several occasions with the applicant and his engineer. The result of those meetings is a revised Tentative Tract Map which resolves many of the concerns that the ,City, Engineer and Planning staff and the citizens had with the subdivision. There are however several issues that have not been resolved to the total satisfaction of the parties involved which merit discussion as a part of this report. In order to adequately address each of these issues, the staff will attempt to fully describe them in the following sections. Generally, the problems of access to Deep Canyon and the problems of access from the existing subdivision and the overall design of the subdivision have been resolved. In addition, some new issues have been brought up by the ap- plicant regarding the conditions to be attached by the City. This is regarding who pays for the improvement of Rutledge Way and Magnesia Fall's Drive adjacent to the proposed park expansion and whether any improvement would be in lied of the fee which provides for the difference between the approximately 1.954 acres, which is being recommended, and the 2.7 acres which is required under the Sub- division Ordinance. This disagreement will be more fully discussed under sub- sequent sections. B. . A List of Items That Have Been Resolved - The following items have been agreed upon between the staff and the applicant. 1. Road Widths and Their Design (See revised map) 2. The staff no longer recommends that a restriction be placed on lots adjacent to existing overhead facilities to the extent that they be required to par- ticipate automatically in any subsequent undergrounding districts. This recommendation is based upon the advise from the City Attorney that such a requirement would not be enforceable. 3. The requirement for street lights is no longer recommended by either the Planning staff or the City Engineer. 4. All proposed connections to the existing subdivision to the south be deleted except for Primrose. The staff is recommending the extension of Primrose for the following reasons: a. It provides for a direct pedestrian and vehicular access between the two portions of the total subdivision which may be needed once the pro- posed subdivision occupants are more established and become a part of the neighborhood. b. It provides for some relief from Rutledge Way in terms of west-bound access and ingress and egress to the subdivision. Because•a direct connection to Deep Canyon Road and Rutledge Way as the proposed design would exist, the staff feels that the amount of usage from the proposed extension of Primrose will not be substantial . The concerns regarding the design of the existing portion of Primrose which has resulted in some accidents will be mitigated through stop and parking controls. The design of the proposed extension of Primrose includes the widening of Primrose within the proposed subdivision. C. ;Proposed Community Facilities Dedication - .In the last staff report, the staff recommended that Lots 177-185 be given for park purposes and the difference between those lots and the required 2.7 acres be given in fees. The staff still supports that recommendation. In terms of possible aternatives, there are reasonably two beyond this one. The second one is to require that the in lieu fee be given and no land. The third alternative is to accept the applicant's offer of additional land off-site from the subdivision. The staff is recom- mending the first alternative in that it will be an expansion of an existing facility and some money would be available to begin the improvement of the land. At the first Public Hearing on this matter, a suggestion was made that the area be expanded to the full 2.7 acres. The applicant indicates that he does not favor this approach in that they have already had installed a water line down the proposed extension of Rutledge Way as it now exists to provide -2- Staff Report. Tract No. 8237 September 9, 1976 C. Proposed Community Facilities Dedication (continued) for water to service the lots in that area and have gone so far as to include the laterals to service these lots. To re-locate Rutledge Way further to the east would result in a monitary loss to .the applicant from the standpoint of losing these improvements already installed. This does not<-app ae r) justifiable from the standpoint of the resulting land that would occur if Rutledge Way were extended further east. D. Improvement of Rutledge Way and Magnesia Falls Drive Adjacent to the Proposed Park Site - The applicant in the most recent discussions no longer feels that the requirement of the west half of Rutledge Way to be improved by him is justified since the westerly side of the street would be dedicated to the City. He feels that to require him to do these improvements should be 'in lieu of the in lieu fee difference between 1.954. acres and the 2.7 acres. The staff does not agree with the applicant's contentions. E. Dra�ina ee - The City Engineer in review of the requirements for drainage for the subdivision is now recommending a slight revision to the original requirement. They deal with the requirement that the design of the subdivision 's improvements be such as to allow for a ten foot wide lane to be open on all streets during a one-year storm, a ten-year storm not exceeding the curb height on all streets, and that a hundred-year storm not inundate proposed structures. The applicant agrees with all the requirements except for the one which deals with not ex- ceeding the curb height during a ten-year storm. The staff believes that this requirement can be met and recommends that the condition b'e>a lied' to the sub- division. �~' F. Sidewalks - The applicant now agrees that sidewalks are appropriate on the east side of Rutledge Way and on both sides of "A" and "F" Streets. The staff cannot support such a concept in that it results in iniquities in terms of affect on the ultimate property owners, both those who would have the sidewalks and those who do not. In addition, such an improvement does not adequately provide for pedestrian circulation throughout the subdivision. With regards to Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road frontage, the staff is recommending that the required sidewalks be widened to ten feet to allow for its use as a bicycle path connection between existing-and future residential areas and the Middle School/Community Park complex and future school and park facilities proposed in the nieghborhood. G. Desert Star Boulevard Extension - The staff is now recommending that the ex- tension of Desert Star be limited to pedestrian and drainage access only to the subdivision. In addition, that an offer of the full right-of-way be made by the developer but not be accepted by the City. This keeps the future con- nection option open if it is determined appropriate by the City. Some portion of Desert Star Boulevard will have to be provided so that access to "F" Street can be given to the west-most lot within the subdivision on Desert Star. V. BENEFITS OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION: A. Completion of Circulation System in Area B. Provides the Potential for Reasonably Priced Housing C. Resolves an Existing Drainage Problem D. Provides Alternatives Safe and Direct Access to the Middle School/Community Park Complex E. Increases an Existing Park Area -3- Staff Report Tract No. 8237 September 9, 1976 VI. DRAWBACKS OF PROPOSED SUBDTVISION: A. The existence of a portion of.the former.total subdivision has resulted in major compromises in the areas of circulation and-access which could have been solved except for the existing configuration. For example, increased usage of Rutledge Way for access to the proposed subdivision which may cause severe conflicts adjacent to the Middle School Complex cannot be mitigated except for additional widening. The present subdivision design is considered to be the best possible under this limitation. B. Increased service costs for the City such as road maintenance, police and fire services, etc. These costs are somewhat offset by increased services to the City from the resulting residents in terms of State subventions in the amount of approximately $21 per person and sales tax. VII. FUTURE REVIEW: The real success of this potential development will be determined by the design, size, and types of improvements related to the proposed houses to be constructed on the lots being developed within this subdivision. Concerns such as building size, variety of design of the units, treatment along Magnesia Falls, Deep Canyon, and Rutledge Way will determine the successful integration of this project into the community. In addition, the amount of landscaping and fencing. will determine the success of the overall appearance of the total subdivision. If the normal City standards of complete landscaping of the front yard areas and complete fencing of the rear yard areas are supplemented by more substantial treatment along the three major roadways, staff believes that the appearance of the project will be successful . Further, if the unit sizes are compatible with the lot size and the exterior design creates a .comfortable environment, staff believes that this project will benefit the community. These factors will be determined during the Design Review Process. -4- NOTES FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1976 PERTAINING TO TRACT NO. 8237 1. The Commission considered a condition of street lights shall be installed at the intersections of Magnesia Falls Drive and Rutledge Way, "A" Street and Deep Canyon Road, and Rutledge Way and Portola Avenue. 2. The Commission also considered a condition indicating that the improvement width of "G" Street, northerly of Primrose Drive shall be 40' wide on 50' of right-of-way. 3. The Commission also considered a condition requiring that Deep Canyon Road be widened to full 32' width of improvements all the way to 44th Avenue. 4. The Commission also considered a condition requiring a pedestrian way to be provided at the end of Florine Avenue. None of the above conditions were incorporated into the Conditions of Approval . PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. COMMUNITY PLANNERS-DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS 73-893 HIGHWAY 111 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 (714) 346-6165 346-6166 DATE: Sept. 10, 1976 TO: City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Square Palm Desert, Calif 92260 ATTENTION: Paul , Williams, Planning Director PROJECT: U01-00001 DESCRIPTION: Tentative Map 8237 COMMENTS: Enclosed please find 12 copies of revised Tentative Map Tract 8237. Revisions made at request of City Planning Director Paul Williams. PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. BY: Don H. Shayler 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LADE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714; 346-06E8 — REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE September 2, 1976 APPLICANT U. S. Life Savings &. Loan. Association 5220 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA. 90036 Attn: Mr. Joseph T. Hall CASE NO. TT 8237 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of August 31, 1976 XXX CONTINUED TO 9-14-76 (7 PM) __• DENIED APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMIISSION RESOLUTION PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COYVHISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. .Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services , City of Palm Desert, within fifteen. (15) days of the date 'of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS , Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission Applicant )Gacix"xR)o)adxRx,.Tx-xxkxDmRx Don Shayl er 6M Frank Goodman MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 31, 1976 B. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR TRACT 8237 - U. S. LIFE SAVINGS Consideration of a final Environmental Impact Report for a 185-unit residential subdivision on 54.5 acres of land located east of Portola Avenue, south of the Whitewater River Storm Channel , and west of Deep Canyon Road. Mr. Williams reviewed the staff report with the Commission. The staff report included comments from the various agencies and organizations that received copies of the EIR. Mr. Williams also presented a late response which was received from the Southern California Air Pollution Control District regarding auto emission calculations. In summary, Mr. Williams stated that staff felt that the information provided in the EIR was complete and recommended that the Planning Commission recommend the EIR to the City Council for approval and certification. Chairman Wilson asked if the applicant was present. FRANK GOODMAN, 73-655 Shadow Mountain Drive, spoke to the Commission and stated that he believed the report stood as recommended by the Planning staff. Chairman Wilson asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak in favor of the completeness of the EIR. Being no one, he then asked if there was any- one who wished to speak against the certification of the EIR. RICHARD KITE, 48-643 Stoney Creek, had a question regarding the number of children that had been projected in the report' as being of school age. Mr. Williams clarified the report for Mr. Kite and stated that 111 school age children were projected for the area; but that the total number of children, under the age of 18, would be 218. Being no other comments, Chairman Wilson closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Berkey moved and Commissioner Mills seconded the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 171, as corrected, recommending certifica- tion of the EIR to the City Council . Motion unanimously carried. C. CASE NO. TRACT 8237 - U. S. LIFE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION Consideration of a Tentative Map for a 185-unit residential subdivision on 54.5 acres of land located east of Portola Avenue, south of the White- water River Storm Channel , and west of Deep Canyon Road (R-1-9,000) . Mr. Williams presented the staff report to the Commission. Said report in- cluded a background of the project and numerous discussion issues as follows: Neighborhood and Community Park Facilities Street Width and Improvement Designs Proposed Types of Improvements Required on the Streets Bonding for the Improvement of Magnesia Falls and Deep Canyon Modification of Florine Avenue Limiting Connections to Deep Canyon Drainage Street Lights Undergrounding Mr. Williams stated that a great deal of discussion had gone into the design of the tract. He further stated that the issues under discussion were in some part caused by a transition that was occurring among the staff in terms of con- verting from utilization of the engineering services of the County to the recom- mendations of the City Engineer, who recently had been appointed to the City staff. J- MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 31, 1976 The three main issues according to staff are road design, undergrounding, and drainage. Mr. Williams recommended that the drainage issue be reviewed by the City Engineer before the Tentative Map goes to the City Council . Mr. Williams further stated that staff felt the sidewalks were essential throughout the sub- division. Chairman Wilson asked if the applicant was present. FRANK GOODMAN, 73-655 Shadow Mountain Drive, spoke to the Commission and pre- sented MR. DON SHAYLER, Engineer for the project, who would be available to answer any technical questions that the Commission might have. Mr. Goodman stated that the primary problem was the drainage problem and that the prime consideration of the entire tract relative to the street layout was to move the water to the Channel . Mr. Goodman stated the first issue he would like to discuss with the Commission was the issue of sidewalks. He presented a map showing the proposed locations for sidewalks within the subdivision. He stated that the developer only wanted to install the necessary sidewalks in order to get the people across the subdivision. He commented on the new im- provement of Alessandro Street and that the City had not installed sidewalks as a part of that improvement. Mr. Goodman stated that he objected to item "f" under Condition No. 2, pertaining to a 20 foot minimum width connection between the subdivision and the existing paved section of Deep Canyon. He felt that item "f" was "redundant". Mr. Goodman's next objection was to Conditions No. 4 and 5, regarding dedication of Lots 177 through 185. He suggested to the Planning Commission that the City_ accept the in lieu fee instead of the land dedication requirement. There was some disucssion regarding Dr. Rigby's property as a possible alter- native dedication. Mr. Goodman also objected to Condition No.' 7, pertaining to the C. C. & R's undergrounding requirement. DON SHAYLER, 73-893 Highway 111, spoke to the Commission regarding the shape and existing slope of the land. Mr. Shayler showed the water drainage routes on the map and stated that the street pattern was designed to accommodate drain- age. Mr. Shayler presented a list of proposed alternative conditions to the Commission. Said list included the deletion of item "f" under the existing Condition No. 2, the modification of item "i", and the addition of. items "j" and "k" to read as follows: i . The extensions of Primrose Drive and Erin Street shall be improved on the basis of thirty-two foot (-32' ) of improvements on a fifty feet (50' ) of right-of-way. Type C curbs are approved on Erin Street. j. Street trees shall be installed as part of the building construction on each lot, and shall be subject to the approval of the Design Re- view Board. k. 5 foot wide sidewalks shall be constructed along the street frontages of Lots 177 through 185, 24-25 ( 'A' Street only) and 134-144 ( 'A' Street only) . Mr. Goodman then stated that he had already met with a representative of the school district and that the district had agreed to provide curb and gutter and sidewalks along Rutledge Way up to the new subdivision. Chairman Wilson asked if anyone was present who wished to speak to the Com- mission in favor of the project. Being no one, he asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak against the project. -4- MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 31, 1976 VICTOR CLARK, 74-280 Erin Street, spoke to the Commission as a representative of several citizens who lived in the area of the proposed subdivision. Mr. Clark presented a letter to the Commission, signed by 48 residents of the area, stating that they were not against the development of the vacant 54-acre site; however, they would like to propose consideration of a plan to cul-de-sac the majority of the streets that are now dead-ended. Mr. Clark further stated that they were asking that Magnesia Falls and Deep Canyon be the only streets that should be extended through. RICHARD KITE, 48-643 Stoney Creek, spoke to the Commission and was concerned with the recreation aspects of the project. Chairman Wilson asked Mr. Goodman if he wished to make a rebuttal . Mr. Goodman stated that they had attempted to achieve what Mr. Clark had re- quested, but that the drainage problem. was a prime consideration due to the land being so flat. RONDI SALTER, 74-120 Desert Star Boulevard; spoke to the Commission voicing her concern about the preservation of the existing character of the neighborhood. ART BENDER, 74-020 Desert Star Boulevard, spoke to the Commission regarding his concerns on the extension of Desert Star Boulevard. He stated that Desert Star was the only boulevard in Palm Desert and that it had become a "raceway" and he was concerned due to the number of children who lived in the area. Chairman Wilson closed the Public Hearing and opened the matter for discussion among the Commissioners. Commissioner Berkey was concerned with access problems regarding Deep Canyon. Commissioner Kelly felt that there were too many problems at this time regarding -' the impact on the area pertaining to schools, families, park facilities, traffic, etc. She felt that the project should-be continued until such time as the City Engineer could review it more thoroughly. Mr. Williams advised the Commission that if they decided to continue the hearing to the next Planning Commission meeting, the applicant would have to agree to the continuance or the project would automatically go to the City Council . Commissioner Van de Mark was concerned about the sidewalk issue and the width of the streets and felt that the City Engineer should be present in order to answer the technical questions pertaining to these issues as the Commission did not have the expertise to make a decision. Commissioner Mills agreed with the suggestion for a continuance. Commissioner Berkey felt that there were a lot of unsolved problems regarding this project and that it needed more study. Chairman Wilson concurred with the idea-of a continuance and felt that the pro- ject had been prematurely presented to the Planning Commission. Chairman Wilson further stated that legally the Commission must get the applicant's approval for a continuance and if the applicant so agreed, he should work with staff to resolve all the problems that had been discussed. Chairman Wilson then reopened the Pub- lic Hearing to discuss the possible continuance. Mr. Goodman stated that he was disappointed as he had spent at least 22 months in discussing the subdivision with staff and they were in agreement with most of the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Goodman stated that he not been able to spend enough time with the City Engineer as the City Engineer had gone on vaca- tion just prior to this hearing. Mr. Goodman stated that time was of great im- portance and if he agreed to a continuance, he was requesting a definite date be set for the next hearing. r MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 31, 1976 Fhort discussion ensued between the Commission and Staff. A date for the t hearing was set for September 14, 1976. airman Wilson asked Mr. Goodman if he agreed to a continuance to September 14, 1976. Mr. Goodman replied that he agreed. Mr. Victor Clark agreed to the continuance. Mr. Art Bender was in favor of the continuance. Commissioner Kelly moved and Commissioner Van de Mark seconded to continue Tract 8237 to the Planning Commission meeting of September 14, 1976. Motion unanimously carried. Chairman Wilson called a brief recess at 8:55 pm and the meeting was reconvened at 9:07 pm. D. CASE NO. CUP 08-76 - DESERT EMPIRE TELEVISION CORPORATION Consideration of a request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the con- struction of a television studio and office facilities on a 3-acre site, located on the north side of Park View Drive, west of Monterey Avenue (PR-7, S.P.) . Chairman Wilson asked Vice-Chaiman Berkey to preside over the discussion on this case and left the Chambers due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Williams showed slides of the location and explained the request for a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Williams further explained that the City Zoning Ordinance permits community facilities in the PR Zone by Conditional Use Per- mit and the Planning Commission must determine that by definition the proposed television broadcasting studio and office facilities are allowable. in the Planned Residential Zone District. Mr. Williams stated that staff felt that the use was appropriate for the area and zone for which it was proposed and that the project would be an asset to the community. Mr. Williams ended his presentation with a staff recommendation that the Planning Commission find such a use is within the intent and purpose of the Planned Residential Zone District and approve the Con- ditional Use Permit request, subject to compliance with conditions. Vice-Chairman Berkey asked if the applicant was present. JOHN CONTE, 75-600 Burro Lane, Indian Wells, (President of Desert Empire Tele- vision Corporation-Owner and Operator of KMIR-TV) spoke to the Commission re- garding his reasons for wanting to move his facilities from Palm Springs to Palm Desert. Mr. Conte stated that he had operated his studios under a Con- ditional Use Permit from the City of Palm Springs for the past eight years and that he had never had any complaints relative to the operation. Mr. Conte further stated that they were in agreement with practically all of the Conditions of Approval and he would like to have Mr. Ricciardi discuss the conditions with the Commission. ROBERT RICCIARDI , 73-700 Highway 111, stated that he was questioning the wording of Conditions No. 14 and 15. He stated these conditions were unnecessary under . the Uniform Building Code and he therefore was requesting their deletion. The conditions is question read as follows: 14. The building must be fully protected by a completely automatic sprinkler system in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard No. 13. -6- Aug 31 , 1976 PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE CONDITIONS . TRACT 8237 1 . All improvements shall conform to the City's Subdivision Standards unless modified by the following conditions. 2. All street improvement shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the City Standards as approved by the City Engineer and shall include the following requirements: a. Streets A, the extension of Rutledge Way and the extension of Desert Star Boulevard, shall be constructed on the basis of forty foot (40') of improvements including pavement, curb and and gutter on a 60 foot right-of way. b. Streets E and F shall have a dedication width of fifty feet (509 plus a three foot (39 wide easement on each side with an improvement width of thirty-sTx feet ,.(36)• The required easement shall be fog-utility purposes only. C. Streets B, C, D, G, and H shall be .improved on the basis of thirty-two feet (321) of improvements on fifty feet (509 of right-of-way. d. Rutledge Way, along the frontage of Palm Desert Middle School from Portola to approximate center line of Lot 17 shall be im- proved on the basis of a half street .including twenty (201) feet of paving, curb and gutter, on a '30 foot half width right- of-way. . e. Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road shall be constructed with full (thirty-two foot (329 of half width travelway) .public improvements adjacent to the subdivision including .paving, curb, and gutter. f, (DELETED) g. The dedications on Magnesia Fa11s. Drive and Deep Canyon shall be as shown on the map. - h. The extension of Desert Star Boulevard shall be modified to provide for a transition satisfactory to the City Engineer. The transition as shown on the tentative map in proximity to Lot 34 is not approved. i . The extensions of Primrose Drive and Erin St. shall be improved on the basis of thirty-two foot (32') of improvements on a fifty feet (509 of right-of-way. Type C curbs are approved on Erin Street. j. .Street;trees .shall be installed as-part of'.the bui.ldi.ng construction on each lot, and .shall be subject to the approval of the Design Review Board. k. 5 foot wide sidewalks shall be constructed along the street frontages of Lots 177-185, 24-25 ('A' Street only) and 134-144 ('A' Street only) s 0 RECEIVED Q i O 0) BERMUDA DUNES E P C7^. INDIAN WELLS r rn CG PALM DESERT NTA LA QU K"KINMENTAL SERVICES I a d INDI0 �� CM OF PALM JbESERT Unified• 1 1 1 Desert Sands VnifieC1 School District 83.049 AVENUE 46 • INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 • (714) 347.8631 September 10, 1976 Paul Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Mr. Williams: This letter should confirm comments made in our conversation on September 3, 1976, regarding the Tentative Map - Tract 8237 - which I believe is also known as the Parkview subdivision. Based on an examination of the tentative map, recognition of existing developments in the area, and concerns about access to the Abraham Lincoln Elementary School , Grades 3-5, and Palm Desert Middle School , Grades 6-8, I have been directed to present the following requests to the City of Palm Desert and the developer of the tract. 1. Request additional street or Pedestrian walkway be required. Pedestrian access between the two schools and many of the, proposed residences, especially in the southeast portion of the tract, will be difficult and must be by excessively long and circuitous routes unless a street or pedestrian walkway is provided connecting Rutledge Avenue and Desert Star Blvd. at a location such as through Lots 17 and 34 or adjoining lots to the east. Our experience has been that children will seek "short cuts" in the absence of streets or walkways in such circumstances which could cause trouble for property owners along both Desert Star and Rutledge. 2. Request that view obscuring wall be provided. It is requested that the developer provide a view obscuring wall on the west property line between the proposed tract and the school district property adjoining (west side of lots 177 to 185) for the purpose of restricting access to and from the school property through private residential properties. The added benefit of increased privacy to home owners is significant. If a block wall cannot be provided, a chain link fence with decorative landscape screening is recommended as a minimum acceptable substitute. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this development. Sincerely, Har Schoenfel , S perintendent by ger M. Harlow, Coordinator RMH/br Ch Welfare and Attendance EUGENE A -SWENSONY-­ , r1 Es POST, 74300 ERIN ST a PALM DESERT CA 92260 si n " nm ion gram D U.S.MAIL MQ 2-048949E243 08/30/76 ICS IPMMTZZ CSP LSAB 2133866278 MGM TDMT LOS ANGELES CA 100 08-30 0557P EST PAUL A WILLIAMS SECRETf.Rli' PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION 45275 PRICKLY PEAR LN PALM DESERT CA 92260 AS I WILL BE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE HEARING ON FILE TT6237 PLEASE ACCEPT THIS LETTER AS MY VOTE AS AN ERIN STREET PROPERTY OWNER TO LEAVE AS MANY STREETS IN THE AREA AS CULDESACS FOR THE SAFETY OF THE MANY CHILDREN WHO LIVE AND ATTEND SCHOOL IN THE AREA EUGENE A SWENSON 74300, ERIN ST 17157 EST MGMGOMP MGM RECEIVED AUG 7.L ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT J Iv TO REPLY BY MAILGRAM, SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR WESTERN UNION'S TOLL- FREE PHONE NUMBERS i fj l Au 1 y� 9S3. 97 I I 1 6, I I City of Pals Desert � l Pals Desert Planning Commission. j + We the citizens near the area of proposed development case no. TT 8237 i are not against development of the Vacant 54 acre site. however, we would like to propose consideration of a plan to cul-de-sac the majority of the streets that. are now dead-ended. 1 As you knew the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44; Magnesia Falls,, Ii east of Portolla! Desert Star Boulevard, east of Portolla; Primrose Drive, i , north of avenue 44; Erin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Florins Street, north of Avenue 44 have boon dead-ended for some time. Mang of the citizens II ; ; who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which offers traffic and noise abatement with safety to small children. In view of the fact that the proposed development is near an existing elementary school. a school bussing point, and a community park which all involve small children playing and walking in the area., we are asking that II i only the streets of .Deep Canyon, porth of avenue 44 and Magnesia Falls.. east of Portolla are'the only streets. extended through to intersect and I form a perimeter. From the perimeter all other streets could be cul-do-saced with serpentine sidewalks adjoining to allow pesdestrain travel to and from II the school and park area, (this arrangement would also help to facillitate water drainage). We believe this could all be accomplished with no loss in the total number of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water district boundlarys by allowing service of coo latex streets. `{ Respectfully: 57, VAF 1 i r 4 i i August 30, 1976 � I ; I �pp I City of Palm Desert I � I Palm Desert Flaming Cor fission: We the citizens near the area of proposed development cases no. TT 8237 are not against development of the vacant yob acre site, however, we would like to propose consideration of a plan to cul-de-sac the majority of the streets that. are now dead-ended. E As you know the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44; Magnesia, Falls, pp cast of Portolla; Desert Star Boulevard, east of Portolla; Primrose .Drive, i north of Avenue 44; Erin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Florins Street, north of Avenue 44 have been dead-ended for some time. Mang of the citizens who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which offers traffic and noise abatement with safety to small children. CT In:vi.ow of the Fact that the proposed development is near an existing I j elementary school, a school bussing„ point, and a community park which all involve small, children play-Ing and walking in the area,, we are asking that only the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44 and Magnesia Falls, east of Portolla are'the only streets extended through to intersect and fora a perimeter. From the perimeter all other streets could be cut-.deasaced with serpentine sidewalks adjoining to allow pedestrain travel to and from the school and park area, (this arrangement would also help to f'acillitate . water drainage). We believe this could all be accomplished with no loss in the total number I of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water district k boundarys by allowing service of complete streets. I , I Ii i Respectfully: 1 I I � I I n -0449 -2 s 9eo gym - y4 -7 q--0So Sin Se 71/d3a �7/ l Q 7` August 30, 1976 VJ�[ t ; City of Palm Desert ialm pert Planning Commission: jWe the citizens near the area of proposed development case no. TT 8237 � ! are not against development of the vacant 54 acre site, however, we would like to propose consideration of a plan to cal-de-sac the majority of the !„ streets that. are now dead-ended. As you know the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44; Magnesia Falls,. east of Portolla; Desert Star Boulevard. east of Portolla; Primrose Drive, i north of Avenue 44; Erin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Florins Street, north of Avenue 44 have been dead-ended for some time. Many of the citizens who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which i offers traffic and noise abatement with safety to small children. In view of the fact that the proposed development is near an existing elementary school, a school bussing point, and a community park which all involve small children playing and walking in the area, we area asking that only the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44 and Magnesia Falls, east of Fortolla are'the only streets. extended through to intersect and I fora a perimeter. From the perimeter all ether streets could b* cul-.de.-sated with serpentine sidewalks adjoining to allow pedestrain travel to and from the school and park area, (this arrangement would also help to facillitate water drainage). i We believe this could all be accomplished with no loss in the total number E of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water district aboundarys by allowing service of complete streets. 1 Respectfully: 7y-13�� � 9 i _ �� �., i pI t i YJ pl zkf I r.� August 30, 1976 City of Palm Desert E . Palm Desert Planning Commission: , �. We the citizens near the area of proposed development case no. TT 8237. are not against development of the vacant 54 acre site, however, we would like to propose consideration of a plan to cul-de-sac the majority of the streets that are now dead-ended. As you know the streets of Deep Canyon,. north of Avenue 44; Magnesia Falls, feast of Portolla; Desert Star Boulevard, east of Portolla; Primrose Drive, i north of Avenue 44; Erin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Flerine Street, north of Avenue 44 have been dead-ended for some time. Many of the citizens i who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which Offers traffic and noise abatement with safety to small children. In view of the fact that the proposed development is near an existing l elementary school, a school bussing point, and a community park which all involve small children playing and walking in the area, we are asking that ' only the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44 and Magnesia Falls, east of Portolla are'the only streets. exteended through to intersect and form a perimeter. From the perimeter all other streets could be cul-de-laced with serpentine sidewalks adjoining to allow pedestrai.n travel to and from the school and park area, (this arrangement would also help to tacillitate water drainage). We believe this could all be accomplished with no loss in the total number of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water district boundarys by allowing service of complete streets. i Respectfullya I � ' f 1 1 Ault 30, 19*76 t fl i I f I City of Palm Desert Palm Desert Planning Commission: i we the citizens near the area of proposed development case no. TT 8237 i are not against development of the vacant, 54 acne site, however, we would like to propose consideration of a plaza to cul-de-sac the majority of the streets that are now dead-ended. jI As you know the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44; Magnesia Falls, east of Portollag Desert Star Boulevard, east of Portollag Primrose Drive, north of Avenue 44, Grin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Florin@ Street, north of Avenue 44 have been dead-ended for some time. Vany of the citizens who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which ! offers traffic and noise abatement with safety to small children.. In view of the fact that the proposed development is near an existing elementary school, a school bussing point, and a community park which all involve small children playing and walking? in the area, we are asking that only the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44 and Magnesia Falls, east of Portolla are'the only streets extended through to intersect and ! form a perimeter. From the perimeter all other streets could be cul-do-saced with serpentine sidewalks adjoining to allow pedestrain travel to and from the school and park area, (this arrangement would also help to ,;acillitate { ' � ! water drainage). , We believe this could all be accomplished with no loss in the total number of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water district boundarys by allowing service of complete streets. I j • 1 , i ' Respectfully: 1 f I i � i k i � I F I I . j Auawt 30, 1476 i k i n I hk� I ; I'll City of Palm Desert t Palm Desert Planning Comai,ssion t j j We the citizens near the area of proposed development case no. TT 8237 ; 1 are not against development of the vacant 54 acre site, however, we would like to propose consideration of a plan, to cul-de-sac the majority of the streets that are now dead-ended. i , � E As you know the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44; Magnesia Falls. i E east of Portolla; Desert Star Boulevard, east of Portolla; Primrose drive. north of Avenue 441 Erin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Florin@ Street, north of Avenue 44 have been dead-ended for some time. Many of the citizens who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which offers traffic and noise abatement with safety to small children. lnIIviaw of the .fact that the proposed development is near an existing j � elementary school, a school bussing point, and a community park which all involve small children playing and walking in the area. we are asking that only than streets of Beep Canyon, north of Avenue 44 and YAgnesia Falls, east of Portolla aree'the only strects. extended through to intersect and ! 1 Porn a perimeter. From the perimeter all other streets could be cul-do..saced with serpentine sidewalks adjoining to allow pedestrain travel to and from I the school and park area. (this arrangement would also help to ,Cacillitate water drainages). We believe this could all be accomplished with no loss in the total number of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water disstrlct boundarys by allowing service of complete streets. , ' I f � 1 Respectfully: I , } i I 1 0 August 30, 1976 i ai i fI City of Palm Desert j Pala Desert Planning Commission; We the citizens near the area of proposed development case no. TT 8237 1 are not against development of the vacant 34 acre site, however, we would like to propose consideration of a plaza to cal-do-sac the majority of the i %tracts that are now dead-anded. I I As you, know the streets of Deep Canyon., north of Avenue 44; Magnesia Palls„ east of Portolla; Desert Star Boulevard, east of Portol.la; Primrose Drive, north of Avenue 44g grin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Florin Street, r north of Avenue 44 have been dead-ended for some time. Many of the citizens, who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which offers traffic and noise abetement with safety to small children. i Injview of the fact that the proposed development is near an existing elementary school, a school bussing point, and a community park which all involve small children playing and walking in the area, we are ,asking that only the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44 and Magnesia Palls, east of Portolla are'the only streets. exteanded through to intersect and fora a perimeter. From the perimeter all other streets could be cul-de-laced with serpentine sidewalks adjoining to allow pedestrain travel to and from the school and park area, (this arrangement would also help to (facillitato grater drainage). j We believe this could all be accomplished with no loss in the total number j of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water district boundarys by allowing service of complete streets. 4 Respectfully: I j I ' _ G August 30, 1976 City of Palm Desert Pala Desert, Planning Commission: i We the citizens near the area of proposed development case no. TT 8237 are not aga nit development of the vacant 34 acre site, however, we would I { like to propose consideration of a plan to cul-de-sac the majority of the streets 'that. are now dead-evaded. {IAs you know the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44; Magnesia Falls, cast of Portolla, Desert Star Boulevard, east of Portellag Primrose Drive, { i north of Avenue 44; Erin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Florins Street, north of Avenue 44 have been dead-ended for some timi. Many of the citizens ! who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which offers traffic and noise abatement with safety to small children. in ;view of the fact that the proposed development is near an existing . elementary school, a school bussing point, and a community park which all involve small children playing and walking in the area, we are asking that ! only the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44 and Magnesia Falls, east of Portolla are'the only streets. exte9nded through to intersect and form a perimeter. From the perimeter all other streets could be cul-de-laced + with serpentine sidewalks adjoining to allow pedestrain travel to and from the school and park area, (this arrangement would also help to facillitate water drainage). t We believe this could all be accomplished with no loss in the total number i of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water district boundaarys by allowing services of complete streets. i { I' I Respectfully: I ' I a { I & August 30, 1976 i i ! City of Palm Desert l � � Pala Desert Planning Commission i We the citizens near the area of proposed development case no. TT 8237 1 i are not against development of the vacant 54 acre site, however, we would like to propose consideration of a plan to cul-de-sac the majority of the streets that are now dead-ended. i { ' As you know the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44, Magnesia Falls,. j east of Portolla; :Desert Star Boulevard, east of Portolla; Primrose Drive, north of Avenue 44; Erin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Florin Street, f i north of Avenue 44 have been dead-ended .for some time. Puny of the citizens who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which ( ' offers traffic and noise abatement with safety to small children. iIn viewof the fact that the proposed development is near an existing elementary school, a school bussing point, and a community park which all involve small children playing and walking in the area, we are asking that only the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44 and Pgnesia Falls, i east of Portolla are`the only streets extended through to intersect and form a perimeter. From the perimeter all other streets could be cul-do-laced with serpentine sidewalks adjoining, to allow pedestrain travel to and from they school and park area, (this arrangement would also help to facillitate water drainage). F We believe this could all, be accomplished with no loss in the total number of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water district boundarys by allowing services of complete streets. i I E i I i Respedt ly: I I , 1 i August 30, 1976 I City of Palm Desert if Palm Desert Planning Commission: jWe the citizens near the area of Proposed development case no. TT 8237 are not against development of the vacant 54 acre site, however, we would like to propose consideration of a plan to cul-de-sac the majority of the streets that. are now dead-ouded. ! As you know the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44; Magnesia Falls, i ! ! east of Portolla! Desert Star Boulevard, east of Portolla; Primrose Drive, north'o:f Avenue 44; Erin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Florins Street, north of Avenue 44 have been dead-ended for some time. Many of the citizens ' who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which offers traffic and noise abatement with safety to small children. In'viow of, the fact that the proposed development is near an existing elementary school., a school bussing point, and a community park which all involve small children playing and walking in the area, we are asking that ! only the streets of Deep Canyon, porth of Avenue 44 and Magnesia Falls, east of Portolla are'the only streets. extended through to intersect and form a perimeter. From the perimeter all other streets could be cul-de..saced fi with serpentine sidewalks adjoining to allow pedestrain travel to and from the school and ark area, (this arrangezmeaat would also help to £acillitate . water drainage). Ii Is We believe this could all be accomplished with no loss in the total number of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water district boundarys by allowing service of complete streets. I j j Respectfully: i t 71 ) i � f z August- 30, 1976 li i City of Palm Desert ! Palm Desert Planning Commission: I We the citizens near the area of proposed development case no. TT 8237 I i are not against development of the. vacant 54 acre sites, however, we would like to propose consideration of a plaza to cul-de-sac the majority of the I � streets that are now dead-ended. i As you know the streets of Deep Canyon, north .of Avenue 44; Magnesia Falls, east of Portolla; Desert Star Boulevard, east of Portolla; Primrose Drive, f i north of Avenue 44; Erin Street, north of Avenue 44, and Fl.orine Street, north of Avenue 44 have been dead-ended for some time. Puny of the citizens who reside in the area do so because of the existing arrangement which I offers traffic and noise abotement with safety to small children. t xn!view of the fact that the proposed development is near an existing elementary school, a school bussing point, and a community park which all involve spmll children playing and walking in the area, we are asking that only the streets of Deep Canyon, north of Avenue 44 and Magnesia Palls, '•, east of Portolla arw thee only streets extended through to intersect and form a perimeter. From the perime3ter all other streets could be cul..de-saced with serpentine sidewalks adjoining to allow pedestrain travel to and froze the school and park area, (this arrangement would also help to .facillitate water drainage). i We believe this could all be accomplished.with no loss in the total number of dwellings to the developer and would further simplify the water district { bmuaadarys by allowing service of complete streets. " Respectfully: If I , " 71-l-3411 - ` I � i 77 EUGENE , A --SWENSON' — o 74300 ERIN ST PALM DESERT CA 92260 western union MailgramI L A- 2-048949E243 08/30/76 ICS IPMMTZZ 'CSP LSAB 2133866278 MGM TDMT LOS ANGELES CA Ion 08"30 0557P, EST PAUL A WILLIAMS SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING .COMMISSION 45275 PRICKLY PEAR LN PALM DESERT CA 92260 AS I WILL BE; UNARLE TO ATTEND THE- HEARING ON FILE TT8237 PLEASE ACCEPT THIS LETTER AS MY VOTE AS AN ERIN STREET PROPERTY OWNER TO LEAVE AS MANY STREETS IN THE AREA AS CULDESACS FOR THE SAFETY OF THE MANY CHILDREN WHO LIVE AND ATTEND SCHOOL IN THE AREA EUGENE A SWENSON 74300 ERIN ST 17i57 EST RECEIVED MGMCOMP MGM AUG 31 119-7[j ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT TO REPLY BY MAILGRAM, SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR WESTERN UNION'S TOLL FREE PHONE NUMBERS u � 11 • ( :( 7 irk Y "� f FS?� � " T illy. 1 }i Hry . tT 1 i l'j V'lTi ,1 l.+ 1 N. +}f •I'(' 1 1(1.v 1 Y 7 K i<7.f 12'� *; _j SJ iv .".7 + d !i z T r tl Y Y r ": .{ „ ( '�..j yTO+fiEPLY BY:,MAILGRAM, P.HONE. ,WESTERNiUNION rANY•,TIM;E, sDAY OR NIGHT:,IE ;.�. i+ A %d !'.T 07 !It ,M•,.' rW %1 T nee a T i !.N ., t . ITN. FOR YOUR LOCAL NUMBER, SEE THE WHITE PAGES OF YOUR TELEPHONE DIRECTORY + m n fit+ •. i ? OR f DIAL (TOLL FREE)800-257-2241 f 5 n i (EXCEPT IN NEW JERSEY 800-B32-2271) OR DIAL WESTERN UNION'S INFOMASTER SYSTEM DIRECTLY: FROM TELEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6161 FROM TWX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 420 1212 August 27, 1976 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TRACT 8237 1. All improvements shall conform to the City's Subdivision Standards unless modified by the following conditions. 2. All street improvements shall be designed and constructed in confor- mance with the City Standards as approved by the City Engineer and shall include the following requirements: a. Streets A, the extension of Rutledge Way and the extension of Desert Star Boulevard, shall be constructed on the basis of forty foot (40' ) of improvements including pavement; curb and gutter, and street trees, plus five foot (5' ) wide sidewalk on both sides of said street. b. Streets E and F shall have a dedication width of fifty feet (50' ) plus a three foot (3' ) wide easement on each side with an improvement width of thirty-six feet (36' ) plus a. five foot (5' ) sidewalk. The required easement shall be for utility purposes only. ,,rc. Streets B, C, D, G_? and H shall be improved on the basis of thirty-two feet (32` ) of improvements on fifty feet (50" of right-of-way with a five foot (5' ) sidewalk on both sides. d. Rutledge Way, along the frontage of Palm Desert Middle School from Portola to approximate center line of Lot 18 shall be im- proved on the basis of a half street including paving, curb and gutter, street trees and sidewalk. e. Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road shall be constructed with full (thirty-two `root (32' ) of half-width tratieltay) public improvements adjacent to the subdivision including but not limited to paving, curb and gutter, and street trees , plus sidewalk. f. A twenty foot (20' ) minimum width connection built and paved to City Standards shall be provided between the subdivision and the existing paved section of Deep Canyon to the south of the subdi- vision. g. The dedications on Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon shall be as shown on the map. h. The extension of Desert Star Boulevard shall be modified to provide for a transition satisfactory to the City Engineer. The transition as shown on the tentative map in proximity to Lot 34 is not approved. -->i . . The extension of Primrose Drive shall be improved on the basis of thirty-two foot (32 ') of improvements on fifty feet (50' ) of right- of-way. 3. Lot access on all lots abutting Magnesia Falls Drive extended and Deep Canyon shall be offered to the City as a dedication on the final map. 4. In compliance with Article 26. 15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Lots 177 through 185 shall be dedicated to the City for neighborhood and community public facilities as a part of the approval of the final map. Said area shall be accepted by the City as partial compliance of meeting the subdivision's community and neighborhood public facilities needs. The remainder of the public facilities requirement shall be met by the paying of a fee in an amount determined under the provisions of Article 26. 15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 5. The applicant shall provide on the final map a statement that the area granted for recreational facilities shall begin development within five years of dedication to the City. -1- M A Conditions of Approval Tract 8237 August 27, 1976 6. Drainage facilities satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be provided as a part of the improvement of the subdivision. Specific drainage facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to consideration of the tentative map by the City Council . If resolution of the appropriate drainage facilities is not achieved prior to October 1, 1976, the map shall be considered by the City Council and they shall make the final determination as to the appropriate drainage facilities. 7. The applicant shall provide in the C.C. & R's for the lots abutting all existing area utilities that a statement that the owners of these lots agree to be a part of any undergrounding district that is thereafter created for the purpose of undergrounding existing transmission lines oin rear lot lines of said lots. Said condition shall run with the lot hereafter. 8. As a paw(; of the public improvements within all proposed dedications, the applicant shall provide street name signs in conformance with City Standards at no cost to the City. 9. The proposed street names are not approved. Prior to submittal of the final map, the applicant shall provide the City with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street names shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services. 10. As a part of street improvements, the applicant shall provide "Not a Through Street" signs on all proposed cul-de-sacs in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. 11. All lots shall be a minimum of 9,000 square feet. Any modification of the proposed lot pattern that results from any condition attached by the City shall not be construed as a right to reduce the square footage of the lots to less than 9,000 square feet. 12. Prior to consideration of the tract by the City Council , this map shall be revised to reflect the following: a. the required neighborhood and .public community facilities dedication (Lots 177 through 1.85) b. typical street cross sections in detail c. other information as required by the Subdivision Ordinance *d. deletion of the access to Deep Canyon by E Street and the required re-design of Lots 121 through 125 that results from this revision . ,f * Please refer to Staff Report for alternatives relative to this requirement. -2- August 26, 1976 CITY of PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Case No. : TRACT 8237 Applicant: U. S. Life Savings and Loan I. REQUEST: That approval be granted for a 185-lot subdivision on property located easterly of Portola Avenue, northerly of 44th Avenue (attached vicinity map). II. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission, by Resolution No. recommend approval of the Tentative Map to .the City Council , subject to conditions. Justifica- tion for this approval is based upon the f(Jl_l.owing facts: 1) the proposed map is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan 2) the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision ash modified by the recommended conditions :wil lbe,consi-ste-nt-with-the..Gene_ral-Plan. i 3) the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed 4) the site is physically suited for the proposed density of the develop- ment 5) the design of the subdivision as amended by the recommended conditions and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause .subs.ta.ntial .en- 'vtmnmenta-1 damage or substantially endanger any wildlife or their habitat 6) the design of the proposed subdivision and the related improvements are not likely to cause serious health problems III. BACKGROUND: A. Tract Size: 54 Acres B. Proposed Lots: 185 C. Zoning: R-1-9,000 D. Adjacent Zoning: North - S, and O.S. East - PR-5, N and O.S.N. South - R-1-9,000 West - P and S E. Environmental Finding: Staff has determined this project to be environ- mentally significant and an Environmental Impact Report has been developed and said report has been scheduled for review at the meeting id con- junction with this project. F. Effect of New Subdivision Ordinance: The owner of the property has agreed to conform to all the requirements of the new Subdivision Ordinance by a let- ter dated July 2, 1976: IV. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: A. Introduction The issues tha-t wrll'be discussed under-_this_Section— are in some part caused by a transition period that is oc- curring among the staff in terms of converting from utiliza- tion of the engineering services of the County to the recom- mendations of the City Engineer, who recently has been ap- pointed to the City Staff. -1- Staff Report Tract,8237 ,Au.gust 26, 1976 IV. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: A. Introduction (continued) The project under discussion was initiated during a period of time when the City was relying on the County for engineering advice. The issues ' `, that will be discussed in the subsequent sections are really matters that = ,? could have been resolved prior to the filing of the map if the City would have been fortunate to have its own City Engineer at the beginning of this project. The applicant is naturally concerned relative to some of the issues that have arisen at this point in time in the processing of the Tentative Map. This concern is understandable. However, many of the issues that will be addressed must be resolved before this map could go forward to the City Council . In addition, the map under consideration came to the City at a time when a conversion was being made from the previous County Subdivision Ordinance to the City's new Subdivision Ordinance. The applicant, in filing this map, did agree to conform to all the requirements of the new Subdivision Ordinance. That letter is on file in the project case file. In order to get at the critical issues confronting the Commission on this matter, it is proposed to discuss each element separately with the staff recommendation being proposed in the recommended conditions of approval . Before going onto the staff's analysis of the issues of this project, it is suggested that .the Commission review the attached memorandum from the City Engineer and the letter filed by the applicant's representative in conjunction with the tract map. Further, the Commission should understand 'that with the adoption of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, a number of specific requirements must be met by any subsequent tract. However, in addition, the Subdivision Ordinance does have many areas which are somewhat subjective in terms of the amount of improvements that are required as a part of the subdivision. The City Engineer has attempted to give his best judgment as to the types and amounts of public improvements that should be required of this subdivision. The Commission and ultimately the Council in review of this subdivision must weigh the merits of the requirements being recommended to determine the best alternatives to apply. Wherever possible, the Planning staff will attempt to distinguish between the mandated require- ments and the areas in which the Commission and Council may have some flexi- bility. B. Neighborhood and.Community Public .Facilities Purusant to Article 25.16 of the Subdivision Ordinance, an applicant for a subdivision is required to provide area necessary for desirable neighborhood facilities such as •parks and playgrounds. For subdivisions larger than 100 lots, the requirement is on the basis of one and two tenths acres per hundred lots or five percent of the total area of the subdivision whichever is greater. As an alternative, a fee may be paid in the amount equal to the value of the same land area. The determination of which route to take is ultimately de- cided by the City Council upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission. In reviewing the map, it should be noted that the applicant is proposing to go the fee route. Pursuant to the formula of the Subdivision Ordinance, the applicant is required to dedicate at least 2.7 acres or to give a fee equal In value to that']and_ared 'The . C•lty Engineer, iS recommending__hat land be given by the applicant in the form of Lots 177`through 185':'Staff believe's the recommendation of the City Engineer is appropriate in that it a logical expansion of an existing park that can be construed as being in conformance with the General Plan in terms of appropriate location for.park dedication. ' Further, it provides for a break between public activities and private resi- ,,.,-, 'dents on a street versus the rear property line. Such an approach appears more appropriate than what is being proposed by the applicant, which is the payment of a fee. -2- Staff Report Tract 8237 August 26, 1976 IV. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: C. Street Width and Improvement Designs Proposed "The proposed design -of the streets within the subdivision is based upon existing County standards. The .street widths and design widths are ac- ceptable by the City Entineer except for Street A, the extension of Rutledge Way, all of which are proposed to have 36 foot wide improve- ments. The City Engineer is suggesting that this be enlarged to forty feet. Such a requirement appears reasonable -in that this would provide for two travel lanes of 12 feet each and two parking lanes of 8 feet. Further, the City Engineer is recommending that on Streets E, F, & G, the extension of Primrose Drive and all the cul-de-sacs that, in addition to the proposed 50 foot right-of-way, a 3 foot -wide easement on each side of the street be granted to the City for public utilities, sidewalks, and street tree planting. Such a requirement appears appropriate only for Streets E and F and the proposed easement should be limited to utility purposes. In addition, the cul-de-sacs should be developed as proposed by the applicant, with the addition of sidewalks. D. Types-of Improvements Required on. the Streets The City Engineer is requiring that the street improvements include paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, sewer, water, and drainage facilities on all street frontages. Such a requirement is standard throughout the City with the exception of sidewalks. The staff believes that this area, in that sidewalks exist in the adjacent developed subdivisions, has an established pattern of .sidewalks and therefore the City Engineer's request for requiring sidewalks appears appropriate. Further, this is an area of families and has a number of routes leading to the adjacent school and park complex, all of which indicate a need for sidewalks throughout the subdivision. E. Bonding for the Improvement of Magnesia Falls and Deep Canyon The applicant in his submittal of .the tentative map proposed to not improve Magnesia Falls or Deep Canyon as a part of the development of the subdivision. The City Engineer is recommending that they be constructed as a part of the subdivision. The staff would agree with the City Engineer's recommendation. In the initial discussions with the applicant, it was felt that Magnesia Falls not be completed until the connection was made with the existing Magnesia Falls Drive, westerly of the Community Park. However, in further review of the need (:for the construction of Magnesia Falls Drive it is now felt that it should be done as a part of the subdivision because it will give additional access to the Community Park and school facility.. Further, it may take some of the through traffic off the local .streets within the proposed subdivision. Finally, the City does have plans to extend Magnesia Falls Drive through or adjacent to the Community Park within a reasonable one to two year period; thus, the con- nection then would be made from Portola which would then provide an additional access point to the subdivision at that time. F. M9d _fication of Fl_orin`e-Avenue!., The City Engineer is requesting that a cul-de-sac be provided at the northerly end' of the existing Florine Avenue. This matter has been one of the major points of discussion during every meeting held on this subdivision. In final review of the need for a .cul-de-sac at that point, it was felt that ultimately the portion of Florine northerly of Erin should be considered for abandonment and said property should revert back to the adjacent property owners since there would be no public need for said street area once this subdivision were developed. It is felt by staff that the critical issue in this area is to solve the surface drainage problem. The applicant has made provisions for the drainage. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City Engineer's re- quirement not be applied relative to Florine Avenue. -3- Staff Report Tract 8237 August 26, 1976 IV. DISCUSSION. OF ISSUES: (continued) G. Limiting Connections to Deep Canyon The City Engineer is recommending that the number of access points to Deep Canyon be limited to E Street. The logic for this is the fact that __- Deep Canyon is proposed as a major-arterial and the number of access points .` should be greatly limited compared to intersections of local streets. Further, the City Engineers looking towards the method of development of the property to the east of Deep Canyon and the potentiality of access points from the east. The applicant, if he chose to accept the City En- gineer's requirement, may increase his lot count if he were to go in this manner. However, in reviewing what the applicant is trying to achieve in terms of circulation, the Planning staff is of the opinion that a connection to Deep Canyon from Rutledge Way and a connection to Desert Star Boulevard is necessary. Therefore, if the Commission is in- clined to recommend further limiting access to Deep Canyon, it would be recommended that an alternative of allowing A Street and F Street inter- sections to remain and that E Street not be allowed to access Deep Canyon. Further, a third alternative possible is to limit access to Deep Canyon at A Street only. All these alternatives have pros and cons. The criti- cal concern in any modification of, access, to Deep Canyon is the fact that the applicant has designed the subdivision's_Cr- fnagg system-to f_1_ow Deep Canyon. The suggestion of the City Engineer probably has a strong reliance on the fact that this reduces the number of lots from the proposed six to two which will side upon Deep Canyon which is a major arterial . Such a re- lationship is oftentimes not the best site design once the traffic volumes reach a certain level . This is based upon the fact that the side yard setback is the smallest setback allowed 'in relationship of the street and the structure. The applicant may want to reconsider this lot pattern ad- jacent to Deep Canyon since special design concerns should be built into these six lots as a part of the design of the houses if the present layout stands. H. Drainage Based upon the review of the amount of drainage that is accepted from the existing subdivision, the most paramount concern in any discussion on the proposed subdivision has been the matter of drainage. The City Engineer in reviewing the subdivision had not been privileged to a number of dis- cussions relative to drainage that have occurred between the applicant's representative and the City's Master Drainage Consultants and engineers in the County. The applicant is proposing that surface drainage occur on all the streets to a point at the proposed intersection of Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon. At that point, .the applicant is proposing for a temporary drainage outlet sized for a ten-year storm with the capability of overflow up to and including a 25-year storm. Because of the paramount importance of drainage, the applicant has been somewhat limited in his street pattern to guarantee that drainage is possible throughout the subdivision. In fact, this is one of his objections to limiting access to Deep Canyon in that the majority of his drainage is proposed to go to Deep Canyon and subsequently into the Wash. With regards to this issue, both the City Engineer and the applicant are correct. Drainage must be solved as part of the subdivision. The applicant's representatives contend that they solved the drainage. The City Engineer is simply attempting to guarantee that the drainage does occur. For these reasons, therefore, the staff is recommending that a condition be applied to the approval requiring that drainage be provided in a manner ac- ceptable to the City Engineer, before the tract map is considered by the City Council . Such a condition will allow time for the City Engineer and the applicant's engineering representatives to reach an agreement as to the appropriate method of solving the drainage problem. - -d Staff Report. Tract 8237 August 26, 1976 IV. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES: (continued) I. Street Lights The City Engineer is recommending that a requirement be attached to the subdivision that the applicant provide a standard improvement agreement to agree to install streetlights at. such time as the City deems necessary. In review of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, •such a requirement would appear reasonable except for. the fact that the Ordinance requires that street lighting facilities be in accordance with the Council 's policy for the area of the City where the subdivision is located. At this time, the Council has not adopted any policy relative to street lighting either in this area or any portion .of the community. Therefore, it is suggested that this requirement not be attached to the subdivision. J. Undergrounding The City Engineer's recommendation is -that the applicant be required to pro- vide a future agreement to participate on a 50-50 basis in the undergrounding of the existing overhead utility lines bordering the tract.at such time as the City deems necessary. This matter deals with the fact that existing overhead utilities are located on lots which border the existing subdivision. Under the Ordina 0 the applicant- is required to underground all his facilities including any services from these existing overhead lines. If the proposed development .were being developed as a condominium development or single pro- ject, the City Engineer's recommendation would appear reasonable. However, the proposal- by -the City Engineer in an instance where ownership of the lots affected may change hands many times before the City- was able to implement the undergrounding of these lines, the staff cannotrsupport this requirement. As an alternative, the Commission may want to consider a recorded agreement to participate in any undergrounding district that is created for the purpose of undergrounding these existing lines. Such an agreement would then become part of the deed restrictions on each individual lot and will carry forward thereafter. -5- J W r z v N AV'ENU w N N AVE. COMMUNITY PARK �u E - DESERT STAR 8011'EV 41 c HIVF 9 u ; Q D c m ' o _ a - - w CITY OF PALM DESERT City Limit 44TN AVENUE GO ETA CITY OF INDIAN WELLS City Limit A V E N U E August 27, 1976 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TRACT 8237 1. All improvements shall conform to the City's Subdivision Standards unless modified by the following conditions. 2. All.. street improvements shall be designed and constructed in confor- mance with the City Standards as approved by the City Engineer and shall include the following requirements: a. Streets A, the extension of Rutledge Way and the extension of Desert Star Boulevard, shall be constructed on the basis of forty foot (40' ) of improvements including pavement, curb and gutter, and street trees, plus five foot (5' ) wide sidewalk on both sides of said street. b. Streets E and F shall have a dedication width of fifty feet (50' ) plus a three foot (3' ) wide easement on each side with an improvement width of thirty-six feet (36' ) plus a five foot (5' ) sidewalk. The required easement shall be for utility purposes only. c. Streets B, C, D, G, and H shall be improved on the basis of thirty-two feet (32') of improvements on fifty feet (50' ) of right-of-way with a five foot (5') sidewalk on both sides. d. Rutledge Way, along the frontage of Palm Desert Middle School from Portola to approximate center line of Lot 18 shall be im- proved on the basis of a half street including paving, curb and gutter, street trees and sidewalk. e. Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road shall be constructed with full (thirty-two foot (32' ) of half.-width travelway) public —improvements adjacent to the subdivision including but not limited to paving, curb and gutter, and street trees,, plus sidewalk. f. A twenty foot (20' ) minimum width connection built and paved to City Standards shall be provided between the subdivision and the existing paved section of Deep Canyon to the south of the subdi- vision. g. The dedications on Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon shall be as shown on the map. h. The extension of Desert Star Boulevard shall be modified to provide for a transition satisfactory to the City Engineer. The transition as shown on the tentative map in proximity to Lot 34 is not approved. i. . The extension of Primrose Drive shall be improved on the basis of thirty-two foot (32 ') of improvements on fifty feet (50' ) of right- of-way. 3. Lot access on all lots abutting Magnesia Falls Drive extended and Deep Canyon shall be offered to the City as a dedication on the final map. 4. In compliance with Article 26. 15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, Lots 177 through 185 shall be dedicated to the City for neighborhood and community public facilities as a part of the approval of the final map. Said area shall be accepted by the City as partial compliance of meeting the subdivision's community and neighborhood public facilities needs. The remainder of the public facilities requirement shall be met by the paying of a fee in an amount determined under the provisions of Article 26. 15 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 5. The applicant shall provide on the final map a statement that the area granted for recreational facilities shall begin development within five years of dedication to the City. -1- Conditions of Approval Tract 8237 August 27, 1976 6. Drainage facilities satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be provided as a part of the improvement of the subdivision. Specific drainage facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to consideration of the tentative map by the City Council . If resolution of .the appropriate drainage facilities is not .achieved prior to October 1, 1976, the map shall be considered by the City Council and they shall make the final determination as to the appropriate drainage facilities. 7. The applicant shall provide in the C.C. & R's for the lots abutting all existing area utilities that a statement that the owners of these lots agree to be a part of any undergrounding district that is thereafter created for the purpose of undergrounding existing transmission lines or rear lot lines of said lots. Said condition shall run with the lot hereafter. 8. As a part of the public improvements within all proposed dedications, the applicant shall provide street name signs in conformance with City Standards at no cost to the City. 9. The proposed street names .are not approved. Prior to submittal of the final map, the applicant shall provide the City with a list of proposed street names with at least three alternatives. The approval of the final street names shall be made by the Director of Environmental Services. 10. As a part of street improvements, the applicant shall provide "Not a Through Street" signs on all proposed cul-de-sacs in .a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. 11. All lots shall be a minimum of 9,000� square feet. Any modification of the proposed lot pattern that result's from any .condition attached by the City shall not be construed as a right to reduce the square footage of the lots to less than 9,000 square feet. 12. Prior to consideration of the tract by the City Council, this map shall be revised to reflect the following: a. the .required neighborhood and public community facilities dedication (Lots 177 through 185) b. typical street cross sections in detail c. other information as required by the Subdivision Ordinance *d. deletion of the access to Deep Canyon by E Street and the required re-design of Lots 121 through 125 that results from this revision . I * Please refer to Staff Report for alternatives relative to this requirement. P q i -2- INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM R IE CE I VIED City of Palm Desert AUG 2.3 '976 ENVIRONMENTAU SERVICES TO: Planning Department CITY OF PALM SERVICE FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Tract 8237; Recommended Conditions For DATE: Tentative Map August 23, 1976 The Tentative Map as submitted is incomplete. Therefore it is difficult to make a detailed evaluation and assign certain precise conditions. I would normally prefer to have the basic missing information available so that conditions which are imposed can be drafted in reasonably unambiguous terms. In this case, Mr. Goodman has indicated wishes to present the map to the Planning Commission on August 31 and does not wish to wait until I can review a complete package. He is willing to accept conditions which are contingent upon my review of a complete set of data. The following conditions reflect that understanding: 1 . Full public improvements including paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, sewer, water and drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. The owner shall enter into a Standard Future Improvement Agreement to install street lights at such time as the City deems necessary. 3. Drainage facilities satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be provided. These shall be sufficient to maintain at least one lane of traffic free of water on local streets in a ten year storm and two lanes collectors. Water shall not be allowed to top the curb in a� 25 year storm and shall not be allowed to flood any building pads in a 100 year storm. 4. All local streets shall be 40' curb-to-curb except cul-de-sac streets which may be 36' . The right of way shall be a minimum of 50' with an additional public utility, sidewalk and street tree planting easement on each side sufficient to provide 10' behind the curb line. 5. The extension of Desert Star Blvd. shall be modified to provide a transition satisfactory to the City Engineer. 6. Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road shall be constructed with full (32' travel way) public improvements adjacent to the subdivision. A 20' minimum width connection, built and paved to City Standards, shall be provided between the subdivision and the existing paved section of Deep Canyon to the south. 7. Applicant shall enter into a Future Improvement Agreement to participate on a 50/50 basis in the undergrounding of the existing overhead utility lines bordering the tract, at such time as the City deems it necessary. 8. Applicant shall provide a cul-de-sac at the northerly end of existing Florine Avenue. c � . PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 23, 1976 Page 2 9. Applicant shall submit a revised tentative map incorporating the following additional criteria: a. Park site of 2.7 acres shall be provided between westerly tract boundary and Rutledge Way. (Lots 177-185) b. Rutledge Way shall be only street connection to Magnesia Falls Drive. C. "E" Street shall be only street connection to Deep Canyon Road. d. No lot shall front on Magnesia Fallsl or Deep. Canyon Road. Access rights to these streets shall be approved for dedication to the public. e. All intersections shall be "T" type.! f. Desert Star Blvd. shall terminate into a "T" intersection. g. Typical street cross-sections. h. Other information as required by ordinance. NOTE: The attached sketch gives one possible layout. In light of the major revisions which will be required, it would not be unreasonable for the Commission to continue this matter until such time as the applicant has had an opportunity to review his revised Tentative with the City Engineer. f N / 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM t City of Palm Desert AUG 2 3 13 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES TO: Planning Department CITY OF PALM dtSER1- FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Tract 8237; Recommended Conditions For DATE: Tentative Map August 23, 1976 The Tentative Map as submitted is incomplete. Therefore it is difficult to make a detailed evaluation and assign certain precise conditions. I would normally prefer to have the basic missing information available so that conditions which are imposed can be drafted in. reasonably unambiguous terms. In this case, Mr. Goodman has indicated wishes to present the map to the Planning Commission on August 31 and does not wish to wait until I can review a complete package. He is willing to accept conditions which are contingent upon my review of a complete set of data.. The following conditions reflect that understanding: Full public improvements including paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street - trees, sewer, water and drainage. facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer: ! ;c - 2. The owner shall enter into a Standard Future Improvement Agreement to instal"i street lights at such time as the City deems necessary. 1. _---3. Drainage facilities satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be provided. These shall be sufficient to maintain at least one lane of traffic free of .water on local streets in a ten year storm and two lanes collectors. Water ' shall not be allowed to top the curb in a 25 year storm and shall not be allowed to flood any building pads in a 100 year storm. 4. All local-- streets shall be 40' curb-to-curb except cul-de-sac streets which may be -36'': i%The right of way shall be a minimum of 50' with an additional public utility, sidewalk and street tree planting easement on each side sufficient to provide 10' behind the curb line. , - —The extension of Desert Star Blvd. shall be modified to provide a transition r satisfactory to the City Engineer. 6: `',,Magnesia Falls Drive and Deep Canyon Road shall be constructed with full f. RJ (32' travel way) public improvements adjacent to the subdivision. A 20' i -minimum width connection, built and paved to City Standards, shall be provided between the subdivision and the existing paved section of Deep Canyon to the south. 7. . V Applicant shall enter into a Future Improvement Agreement to participate on �! ' a 50/50 basis in the undergrounding of the existing overhead utility lines .bordering the tract, at such time as the City deems it necessary. 8. -Applicant shall provide a cul-de-sac at the northerly end of existing Florine Avenue. f ' � P i i ♦ j . I „ j ', j a PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 23, 1976 Page 2 9. Applicant shall submit a revised tentative map incorporating the following ,additional criteria: r�-r / a��. Park site of 2.7 acres shall be provided between westerly tract (-; boundary and Rutledge Way. (Lots 177-185) \b Rutledge Way shall be only street connection to Magnesia Falls Drive. C. "E" Street shall be only street connection to Deep Canyon Road. E mod. No lot shall front on Magnesia Falls or Deep Canyon. Road. Access rights to these streets shall be approved for dedication to the public. -e. All intersections shall be "T" type. f ;Desert Star.Blvd_. shall terminate into a "T" intersection. " g.✓ Typical street cross-sections. �h. Other information as required by ordinance. NOTE: The attached sketch gives one possible layout. In light of the major revisions which will be required, it would not be unreasonable -.for the Commission to continue this matter until such time as the applicant has had an opportunity to review his revised Tentative with the City Engineer. I i J } L 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 Y DATE: August 17, 1976 LEGAL NOTICE CITY of PALM DESERT A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP OF 185 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 54 ACRES SITUATED IN THE R-1-9,000 ZONE DISTRICT. "CASE "NO: TT "8237 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Tentative Sub- division Map of 185 single-family lots on 54 acres and situated in the R-1-9,000 Zone District, located south of Magnesia Falls Drive extended and west of Deep Canyon Road extended. tVNEL w � I y Y COMMUNITYPARK 4 MI5 jr DESERT STAR BDUlEY FR 2jj•�jfTl1 ,3 s F p y.^j 9 YJ C6 9 jTa � C` a ,� s r:,• r SAID Public Hearing will be held on August 31., 1976 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall , 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post-August 19, 1976 RECEIVED AUG 2 61976 E ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT f t 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 REC tl'., _ �9SEA'DER h E ' (QTp OVERABLEA Mr. Arnold W. Porsch UNgQI S A�aRESSEQ 6003 Corona Avenue AUG 3 0 1 9 TO FORWARty Huntington Park, CA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. CITY OF PALM DESERT U.S.PUSaAGE►- Q aUG2S RE7D ► to '76 45-276 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 R^ �DER NeT�r Cq CIF TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 6L AS r U1�gg�T DRESSED' O FOR WARD Mr. .Charle A. Forteza IV�/ F.D 74-190 De ert Star IMF,c F. Palm Des rt , CA 92260 AUG 3 0 In-� ENVIRONMENTAL DESERT ERVICES CITY OF PALM y cc,��� O� TI TT{`hlJ.. -- �lr7/tn ^ 20G29`FC � iEji G 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 L' TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 TO FOR C F. C D Mr. Harold M' ler 74-026 Vela do Drive 3 == ) Palm Deser , CA 92260 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY 01: PALM DESERT (D 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 - 3 r �j' TELEPHONE(714) 346-061.1 RN Td 34A/ NETAS RECEIVE ® oVq cF�oR � TpPO. AUG 3 0 197G �R© Mr. Rob rt .E. Walker 4 74-18 Desert Star ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES G , Palm esert , CA 92260 CITY OF PALM DESERT �, F ... S.NUSiAuc; ®${ko� (M):ff nDatTITn'rci =)m=a;,npiop Q AUG24'76 I` a i <s , -:==. 1 3 ` 43 275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 �* TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 `I U�NT / O N `R' OT lF TO , SrD t c RECEIVED FOR��R P James E. Summers 74-041.• in Street AUG 3 p )e d Palm D ert , CA 92260 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT NsSN- G�ti9� jU.S.PUSiAUrI. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,C NIA 92260 � .;ry 1 3 IK K J, �aL1 TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 7-0 /tO k gSaQFi� ,.< � ge�ro FOR o- Tillie/Mitchell 74-11A Desert Star Drive Palm'Desert , CA 92260 RECEIVED AUu 3 0 1976 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT c\<�" � ju.S.POSIAG�Ig CU*f�Z- oS� 1p:n�„s,n �®s�®�{b RETURN TO SENucRU12 1� .. . 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 �.-�( �, `✓?" ^'• 1 3 `x TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 NOT DELJVER.A+ LF AS ADDRESS"-! UNABLE TO FC)R�'\fA`�D Mr. Ross Dow 48-200 P inted Canyon Trail RECEIVED Palm Des rt , CA 92260 A u 3 p 1c,r ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT (Q- AUG24'76 �, 5LjJ.S.P0"fAG 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA9226OEETURr1 roSEI�DfRtjF E ?` , �r. ■ _�=F TELEPHONE(7I4) 346-0811 U7 N 0 A DDR ERABLE F UNABLE Tp foRwA�. uj z o Mr. R bent Laatsch z P. 0. BOX VV W Palm esert , CA 92260 UAU62VE -_.4 "', � .�.vuS1,o�� (45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA92260 ��G�.q9.^TiF3 _ -« TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 s Q1OT Mr. Ro ert Williams AS 1A1';r._, 4190 venida Sevilla . 1 _., �UNggLE C Tp Ft7��v+lgRD ypre s, CA 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 Au ;4 4 h UNDELIVERABLE ? Ju O y�W AS ADDRESSED Mr. Harold Ritter Jty) 2 IraaeLE To FORWARD �` 38279 Charlesworth Place aa� Cathedral City, CA 92234 Za � e 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT.CAUFORNIA92260 c TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 see*- Mr. Thomas Gaines UG 2� 74-110 Erin Street oNM�NtPY O� Rt Palm Desert , CA 92260 �NC`� OF JGG'�_ �AIN D �45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 2�� DE[(VERABI� � R TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 V��Qt ADDRESSED l J K FORWARD 'ID Shirley F. .Kucksdorf 77-101 Ca ifornia Apt . D-16 ���r , Palm Dese t , CA 92260 J L� RV\GES ENV\4o pFEPS�9EgERZ Cam• CD45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE(714) 346-0611 ` S > W W Patrick J. Kearney Z a (� w ,;�: 587 8 Street Am < Cathedral City, CA 92234 o ° . L 1O ��SY ENDE �Q A U G `p. 25 )2 UNDELIVERABLE 3�, t976 AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD SS,�} t PROOF OF PUBLIC.-..ION This spalfLlis for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIAj ss. County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above Proof of Publication of entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- City of Palm Desert lation, published weekly, in Palm Desert, County of --------------------------—---------—---—---- -- Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, ---- ep'--TT $237 —...._....... under date of October 5, 1964, Case Number 83658; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of — —--------------------------—----—------------------ said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on Paste clipping the following dates to wit: of NoticeSECURELY In This Space j LEGAL NOTICE 'I CITY OF-PALM DESERT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR A -'-------�I -9Ia'b-------—----—--------------------------------------- SUBDIVISION OF.54 ACRES INTO 185 LOTS,LOCATED IN THE R-1-9,000 ZONE DISTRICT t CASE-NO.TT8237 .Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held be- fore the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider an Envi- ronmental Impact Report for a Subdivision of 544acres into 185 single-family lots in the R-1-9,0001one District, located south of -- — —_ — —_ _— Magnesia Falls Drive,extended,and west of DeepPtcicapnyon, ex- --------------- tended. ... ,. I�'^P'rL- 10 X� 4 77 I certify (or declare) under penalty or perjury that the y I,_>•_:. rt--�w s foregoing is true and correct. P4kK _�_ tt� Signature r :I Date----------------- 82 -------------------- — — , 197.6_ at Palm Desert, California • I I it I 'tom — .•-Said Public Hearing will be held on August 31, 1976, at 7:00{ pm.in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall,45-275 •Pr.iSAcIV Pear Lane, Palm Desert,California,at which time and place,all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. J Dated:August 17,1976 4 PAULA.wILLIAMS Secretary - PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION ,y'" 4 POP-8/19t1 PROOF OF PUBLICATION • - -- - - -4-1 - - - . r- ' .a _ II -y - -- T t - 1 PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD.COMMUNITY PLANNERS-DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS July 6, 1976 0 73-893 HIGHWAY 111 PALM DESERT CAJITFORNIA (714) 346}-6165 346.6166 • Mr. Paul Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert - P. 0. Box 1648 Palm Desert, California 92260 Subject: Tentative Map Tract 8237 File 74-19500 Dear Mr. Williams: Enclosed for filing are the following: Thirty-two copies of Proposed Tentative Map Tract 8237. Completed application form signed by owner (USLIFE Savings and Loan Association). Environmental Assessment Form. Checks in the amounts of $1 ,275 and $25 for Tentative Map and Environmental Assessment Filing Fees. The project site is commonly known as the balance of the "Dream Homes" area between 44th Avenue and The Whitewater River Channel lying east of the Palm Desert Schools and Community Park. The owner, USLIFE Savings and Loan Association, proposes to divide some 54 acres into 185 lots, and construct and sell moderately priced single-family homes thereon. No written statement from the Riverside County Health Officer relating to availability of water or permissibility of sewage disposal is included in this application, as Mr. Fleshman in your office waived such require- ments. It is noted that the Coachella Valley County Water District has recently completed plans to extend a large capacity water main into this area to serve the Palm Desert Middle School now under construction; the bulk of the proposed project would be served off of this new water line. It is proposed that one small isolated portion of the project containing nine lots on Erin Street be served by the Palm Desert Community Services District, which serves virtually all of the developed area north of Highway III at this time, as these nine lots are in the middle of a block constructed and completed on each end in Tracts 2482 and 2529. Sewer service is proposed to be furnished also by Coachella Valley County Water District, who has recently completed plans to construct a large collector sewer up the south line of the Whitewater River Channel . Proposed street improvements include vertical face concrete curbs, drive- way aprons, and asphaltic pavement per County Standards 102, 105, 106, with 2% crossfall on the paved surface with possible offset crowns in some locations. Rolled (Type C) curb and gutter is proposed for the short length of Erin Street to match the existing improvements on each end. The Mr. Paul Williams File 74-19500 Page 2 July 6, 1976 developer proposes that improvement of Magnesia Falls Drive not be required as a part of this subdivision. An existing meandering windbreak row of tamarisk trees exists along the alignment of Magnesia Falls Drive; existing improvements end at the west end of the park site, and the easterly extension is not passable. In lieu of improvements at this time, the developer proposes to secure competitive estimates from local con- tractors for these improvements, and post cash to the City for the cost of improving the south half of Magnesia Falls Drive and the north end of Deep Canyon Road. The City could then construct these improvements when warranted by traffic demands and other considerations. All new utility construction to serve this subdivision is proposed to be underground. Where aerial utility service occurs for existing lots backing onto the subject property, it is proposed that underground service con- nections only be constructed to these existing aerial utilities. This would be the case for Lots 1 through 17, 57 through 61 , and possible 48 through 56. A temporary drainage structure is proposed at the northeast corner of the site to convey surface drainage to The Whitewater River Channel . This structure would be sized to convey water generated by a 10-year storm from the tract and adjacent residential areas in the southwest quarter of Section 16, T5S-R6E. Provision for overflow into the channel would also be provided for larger storms. The owner/developer understands that a new subdivision ordinance has been recently adopted by the City, and is due to become effective later this month. The owner agrees that this subdivision will be requi°red to conform with the provisions of the new subdivision ordinance. He also agrees that the statutory time limit for Tentative Map processing shall commence with the effective date of the new subdivision ordinance. In the event that the developer proposes to record final subdivision maps in increments, he will submit and process a request for Tract Unit Numbers as specified in the subdivision ordinance. Legal access to this tract is provided by Portola Avenue, Rutledge Street, Desert Star Boulevard, Erin Street, and Primrose Drive; all of these streets have been dedicated to public use by previous subdivisions. Protective Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions will be submitted for the approval ,of the City and other agencies in the processing of the final map. Proposed tree planting will be indicated on a landscaping plan and submitted for Design Review Board approval along with construction plans for proposed residences. PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 73-893 HIGHWAY III PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 Mr. Paul Williams File 74-19500 Page 3 July 6, 1976 If you have any questions concerning this map or need additional informa- tion, please do not hesitate to call this office. Sincerely, PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. D. H. Sha ler DHS:jm Enclosures cc: USLIF.E Savings and Loan Association Affiliated Construction PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 73-893 HIGHWAY III PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 5220 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles California E 6 213 937 2450 L&LIFE SAVINGS and Loan Association July 2, 1976 City of Palm Desert City Hall Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Tentative Map Filing Gentlemen: USLIFE Savings and Loan Association, as owner of the property, agrees to conform with the new subdivision ordinances to be inacted by the City of Palm Desert. Sincerely, Herbert J. odgdon Senior Vice President HJH/bhp cc: Joseph T. Hall State of CelifgrAt4j County of RiversideY ss. On July 2, 1976 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Herbert J. Hodgdon, known to me to be the Senior Vice President of the corporation that executed the within Instrument. WIS gty hand and fficial seal. ,,,,,,\\.••••...,,••..,..•,...,••••••.\...\.... �1\N N\\Nil N\11\Nll i\\I.NN\ ..w.NR. -�--P� OFFICIAL SEAL Mildred Israel MILDRED M. ISRAEL to NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE :AUNTY _ My Commission Expires P7ov.8,1977 , ................................................ A USLIFE COMPANY Los Angeles(Main Office) Baldwin Park Hollywood La Habra North Hollywood II1 INSURED Redondo Beach Riverside San Fernando San Pedro Sun Valley Westchester West Covina ►�sv5s� Wt TRACT 8237 74-19500 PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA RESUME TENTATIVE MAPS AND PARCEL MAPS , ORDINANCE NO. 460 Both State Law and the Palm Desert Subdivision Ordinance require that when any parcel or contiguous parcels in one ownership is proposed to be divided into less than five parts , now, or in the future , a parcel map must be recorded with the County Recorder pursuant to the requirements of that ordinance. Ordinance No. 460 sets standards of land division design , but provides that where the size or shape of the land, the topographical conditions , or the proposed use of the lots make compliance impractical, then the Planning Commission may accept other design standards . Request to deviate from standards of design must be in writing and submitted with the ap- plication for land division and include the necessary justification. The Ordinance provides that all divisions of land shall conform to any general plan or element thereof , specific plans , .requirements of the zoning ordinance and other ordinances . No application for a. tentative map shall be accepted unless it conforms to the zoning classification of the land. An Environmental Impact Assessment must be filed and an Environmental Impact Report may be required. This must be completed prior to the filing of a tentative map. The proposed street system must relate to the streets now in the area. Important streets should be continued, and provision must be considered for the future division of adjoining vacant property. Street inter- sections should be at right angles. Half streets , those less than 30 feet in width , and jogs of less than 200 feet are not permitted. Special street design , such as a frontage road, cul-de-sac street , or a street separated by private property from the major right of way , etc. , for access to the lots is necessary along expressways , arterial , major highways , secondaries and other rights of way. Cul-de-sac streets are limited to 1000 feet in length with a minimum of 21 lots and should have a 90-foot turnaround. Dead-end shall not be longer than 1000 feet with a minimum of 21 lots . Street grades should be less than 6% with a minimum of . 35% - but up to 147o may be approved. Ample justification is required for grades over 10%. The minimum curve radius in level areas is 300 feet and in mountainous terrain it is 150 feet . Legal access must be provided to each parcel. The purpose in dividing land is to provide lots which are usable by the purchaser. Lot depth should not be more than 2-1/2 times lot width , nor should the width be more than 2 times the depth . The side lines should be at right angles to the street . Utility easements are required as necessary. Lot size is determined by the zoning classif- ication and general plan designation. Whenever a tentative parcel map is for the division of land into 4 or less parcels or into parcels that are 40 acres or more , or each of which is a quarter--quarter section , the Planning Commission, upon request of the land divider, may waive the requirement that a final. parcel map be recorded, if the Commission finds that the proposed division of land complies with all the requirements of. the Subdivision Map Act and the ordinance for such divisions of land. In order to comply with this ordinance, a parcel map must have sufficient survey data, all required road dedications , and has no conditions or stipulations that a. flood control agency would require to be on a final recorded map . The request for waiver shall be made at the time of filing the tentative parcel map . i CITY OF PALM DESERT P. 0. Box 1648 PALM DESERT, CA. 92260 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FILING FEE RECEIPT NO. p� TENTATIVE TRACT NO. e2 37 _ (For office use, DATE July 1 , 1976 APPLICANT: Name USLIFE Savings and Loan Association Address 5220 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles Calif. 90036 Telephone No. 231-937-2450 REQUEST: Request is hereby made for approval of Tentative Tract No . 8237 consisting of 54 gross acres , having 185 lots, being a proposed subdivl;sion of land for property described as : a portion of the S.W. 1/4 of Sec. 16 T5S-R6E _ generally located on the south (North, South,East ,West) side of Magnesia Falls between Portola (Name of Street) (Name of Street) and Deep Canyon (Name of Street) ASSESSOR' S PARCEL No. 621-471-001 ,621-455-015,621-440-001 003,004,006 TYPE OF SUBDIVISION Single Family Residential (Residential. , Commercial , Industrial) P.C. approved on -1- jR Y PRESENT ZONE R-1 9000 PROPOSED ZONE No change We the undersigned state that we the ( I , We) (I am, We are) owner of the property described herein and hereby (Owner, Owners) give our authorization for the filing of this (My,Our) proposed tract map : Name USLIFE Savings and Loan (Typed or Printed as shown on Recorded Deed) Signature (see signature page 4) Name (Typed or Printed as shown on Recorded Deed) Signature Name (Typed or Printed as shown on Recorded Deed) Signature Name (Typed or Printed as shown on Recorded Deed) Signature Name (Typed or Printed as shown on Recorded Deed) Signature Name (Typed or Printed as shown on Recorded Deed) Signature Name _ (Typed or Printed as shown on Recorded Deed) Signature Name and Address of Subdivider : Same as owner Name and address of Engineer or Licensed Land Surveyor: No. RCE 18039 PACIFIC RIM 73893 Hwy 111 Palm Desert Calif.92260 SUPPORTING EVIDENCE : 1 . In addition to the required information on the Tentative flap , the source of water supply CVCWD and Palm Desert Comm. Serv. Dist. 2. Type of street improvements and utilities which the subdivider proposes to install streets with curbs per Co. Std. 102,105,106, driveway aprons, 2% cross-fall , A.C. pav' t. , underground utilities except where adjacent to existing facilities P. C. approved on 3. The method of sewage disposal is CVCWD sanitary sewers except in Erin St. 4. Proposed storm water sewer or other means of drainage (grade & size) Temp. outlet to channel at N.E. corner sized for 10 yr. storm from tract and adjacent tracts. 5. Protective covenants to be recorded To be submitted during processing of final map. 6. Proposed tree planting To be included in construction of houses on lots by owner. 7. Preliminary grading plan (type and amount) Nominal grading on very flat site. House .slabs to be min. 12 " above top of adjacent curb. The adopted general plan of the City of Palm Desert recognizes the property described in this application for (Residential , Medium Density Residential (5-7 D.U. per gross acre) Commercial, Industrial , Etc . ) use of land. -3- P.C. approved on This application may be filed only by the owner or lessee of said property and shall be signed by the owner or lessee or by a person with a Power of Attorney, in writing, from the owner or lessee , au- thorizing the application , or by the Attorney-at-Law for the owner or lessee . Indicate your authority below: X I am the owner of said pr.operty. I am the agent for owner of said property (attach written authorization) I have a Power of Attorney from the owner authorizing this application (attach your written authorization) .I am the Attorney-at-Law authorized to act for the owner in this application . I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct . Executed at Palm Desert California, this 1st day of July , 19 76 S5. nature Joseph T. Hall , Ass't. Vice- President USLIFE Savings and Loan Association P. C. approved on -4- � i CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA PROCESSING PROCEDURE FOR TENTATIVE MAPS I . PRE-FILING MEETING: A. The applicant shall file an Environmental. Assessment (EA short form) with the, City of Palm Desert . B. Within two to five days the Department of Environmental Services shall field check the proposed project and contact the applicant in regard to additional required environmental information, if any. * The purpose of the Pre-Filing Meeting is to advise the applicant of all standard requirements pertinent to his project . II . FORMAL FILING: (First Monday of each Month) A. The applicant shall file his completed application by 4:00 P.M. of the first Monday of each month . In the event that the first Monday of the month is a legal holiday , the filing deadline shall be extended to 4: 00 p .m. of the regular working day following said Monday. B. The EA shall contain all information required by the City Resolution 74-14 (as defined by the Planning Division) ..., C. If the application is not complete in its entirety, the Planning Division shall not accept it for filing. D. If the application (after preliminary review) is completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Environmental Services , the following processing procedure shall be followed: 1. When the application is received, the Planning Division Secretary will assign it a permanent file number and prepare a folder. , 2. The first week following filing the Planning Division Secretary will distribute all information to the approp- riate Review Committee. Use the standard form letter which requests that all interested parties submit their response by the third Monday following filing. 3. The first Thursday following filing the Planning Division shall notify the City staff of all pending applications . 4. During the time of the 3rd Tuesday after filing to the 4th Wednesday after filing, the Planning Division will prepare a preliminary Review Committee Report which will be presented to the Applicant and the Review Committee at a scheduled meeting on the 4th 14ednesday after filing. 5. During the time frame of the 4th Friday after filing to the lst Thursday prior to the Planning Commission Hearing, the Planning Department shall prepare the Final Report on the proposed project . III. HEARING - Planning Commission A. The Planning Commission shall : 1. Report , by Resolution , to the City Council their findings and recommendations within 50 days of the date of filing P.C. approved on -5- PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE MAP CHECKLIST (Sec. 5. 1, .Ord. 460) SUBDIVISIONS AND PARCEL MAPS PARCELS PROPOSED (except commercial FOR COMMERCIAL OR or industrial) INDUSTRIAL USE X Thirty copies (folded 812" x 13") of the tentative map and X ; sepia along with necessary fees in the office of the Dept . of Environmental Services . (Section 4. 1) X The minimum.size of the tentative maps shall not be less X than 18" x 26" . (Section 4 . 1) X The tentative map shall be drawn to a scale of 50 , 60, 100, or 200 feet to the inch. (Section 4 . 1) X SECTION 5. 5 INFORMATION REQUIRED. a. The following in- formation shall be delineated on the tentative map except those items determined by the staff as not being per- tinent to a particular tract : X 1 . Tract number, title of map, and legal. description of X - property X 2. Names and address of owner and land divider X ' X 3. Name and address of person preparing map X X 4. Approximate acreage and overall dimensions X ' X . 5. North Point , scale and date X ' X 6. Land division boundary line and vicinity map X X 7. Book and page numbers of adjoining land divisions; X X 8. Names , locations, and widths of adjacent streets X X 9 . Location of existing structures, both above and below X ground X 10. Names and locations and widths of proposed streets X ' X 11 . Approximate grades of proposed and existing streets X X 12. Streets and rights of way providing legal access to the X property X 13. Approximate stre6t centerline radii of curves X ' X 14. Widths of alleys and easements X X 15. Names of utility companies and location of existing and X proposed public utilities � W X 16. Existing culverts and drain pipes X X 17. Water courses and channels including proposed facilities X for control of storm waters P.C. approved on -6- i , X 18.. Land subject to overflow, inundation of flood hazard X o X 19. Railroads and other rights of way X o X 20. Any lands and rights of way to be dedicated to public X use X 21 . Proposed street standards in detail X X X , 22. Dimension of reservations X o X 23. Proposed lot lines and approximate dimensions X X 24. Adjoining property and lot lines X. X 25. Contours , with maximum interval as follows : X SLOPE INTERVAL 0 - 2% 2' 3 - 9% 5 ' 10 plus 10 , Copies of U.S .G.S . maps are not acceptable. X 26. Existing use of property immediately surrounding tract X X 27. Proposed land use of all lots (Single Family , Multi,- X Family , Business , Industrial) X 28. Source of water supply X X 29. Method of sewage disposal X X 30. Existing and proposed zoning X SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. b. Reports and written state- ments on the following matters shall accompany the tentative map: X 1. Subdivision building or. development plans X i X 2. A written statement from the Riverside County Health X Officer stating that U19iVLC� a. A water company under permit has agreed in writing to serve all lots in the subdivision , or, b. The subdivider has an acceptable application for a water company permit on file with the State Depart- ment of Public Health or the County Department of Public Health, or C. The subdivider has agreed in writing to form a domestic water company to serve the subdivision 3. Type of street improvements 1�0'-(_Nfc X / 4. Utilities to be installed U,��� nH l X 5. Proposed method of control of storm water, including X date as to grade and dimensions 6. . Protective coc�ennts proposed to be recorded X 7. If private streets are proposed, the method by which their maintenance will be accomplished and financed X A' P. C. approved on -7- i 8. Proposed tree planting and existing trees . X 9. A written statement from the Riverside County Health X Officer stating the type of sewage disposal that will IUGuC� be permitted. To aid in this determination the Health Officer may require soil percolation tests or other pertinent information. 10. Where the minimum lot size of all lots is 2-1/2 acres X �} or more, the subdivider shall not be required to have a water company under permit or to furnish water to each lot , but shall furnish a statement of the quantity and quality of water of any wells existing on the property, and the estimated current cost of drilling a well on the property. X 11 . A _ written statement from the State Forest Ranger regard- . X ing the adequacy and feasibility of a fire control plan for any land division proposed to be located in either the. medium, high or extreme fire hazard areas as deter- mined by the State Forest Ranger, or a statement from him that the proposed land division will not be located in one of these areas . P. C. approved on -8- FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date SUBJECT RELATED FILE RECEIVED BY RELATED FILES : _FEE INFORMATION EA NUMBER End Appeal Period FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Rreipp MOBILEIIOME PARKS , TRAVEL TRAILER PARKS , rac or arce1 Map RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS General Plan Amendm Flood Control Fees : (Amount) Number of lots x $1 $ Base Flood Fee 50 .00 4. Application Complete Total Flood Fee 5. Filing Fee Attached Filing Fee : Base $ 160 .00 6. Plot Plan checked Number of Lots x$2 . 50 7. Assessor ' s Book No. TOTAL FILING FEE 8. Legal Description _ _ _ _ I Complete and Checked ALL OTHER CASES FILING FEE 9. Tentative Hearing Date — 1.0. Agency Deadline Date _ 11 . Assign Case No . 12. Receipt for check 13. Assign place on agenda _ 14. Newspaper 15. To be published not later than 16. Notice to applicant mailed 17. Notice mailed 18. Notice posted on property by Date SENT TO: Ex Ex x A CAI A CM A CM Agric.Dept . C .V.C.W.D. x Road Dept . Permits Air Poll .Cont .Dist. E .M.W.D. x Road Dept . Planning Airport Dir. Parks Dept . St .Div. Highways Chamber Comm. x Riv.Co.Flood Con. x St .Div. Forestry Plan.Dir.of x HealthDept . x Water QualCoBdNo Desert Off. x LandUseDept . Dept . Development Bldg. Dept . Commissioners Other Notification : CM EXH I DATE BY County Planning - Indio 19. Entries Made in Counter Book Page By Date Case Cleared for Commission by Dir. of Environmental Services City Council Hearing. General Plan Desig. Zoning Dist .orArea Zoning P. C. approved on -9- INSTRUCTION FOR OBTAINING PROPERTY OWNERS NAMES In order to expedite the processing of Changes of `Lone, Variances, and Conditional Use Permits , all applicants will furnish the Department o•f Environmental Services with a list of the property owners and their addresses for all par- cels within 300 feet of the application. These property owner names may be obtained in one of the two following manners: A. Contact a title company and request that they furnish you with a list of names , for which there will probably be a charge. B. You may obtain them yourselves in the follow- ing manner: 1. Secure from the County Assessor's Office parcel maps covering your application and all lands within at least 300 feet . 2. Indicate the area of your request by a red outline on the parcel maps. 3. Delineate, in red, all property within 300 feet of the area of your request . 4. From the parcel map , make a list of book, page, block number and parcel number within the above 300 foot area. 5. Using the Visual Numerical Index File, which is to be found in the Assessor' s Office, place the name and address for each parcel opposite the number described in No. 4 above. 6 . Sign Affidavit attesting to name list . 7. Return this list with your application to the Department of Environmental Services . Approved by Planning Commission 7/1 /74 • Ass ass or 's Map)(Sampt. 0 VAP ® U 13 pp 12 17 16 15 14 e !! 10 9 8 � = 1000 9 15 16 21 22 rl 8 10 14 17 — 20 7 I f 13 19 18 SUBJECT 12,2 6 12 5 PARCEL . 6 7 5 13 11 !0 9 8 12,3 4 14 O r� 21 3 15 20 19 16 17 18 2 16 121 f0 1! 12 1 17 15 14 13 NOTE : THE SUBJECT PARCEL AND THE THREE HUNDRED FOOT PERIMETER LINE ARE TO BE OUTLINED IN RED. " II f y f if CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS ' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF PALM DESERT ) I hereby certify that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described on the attached application and for a distance of three hundred ( 300) feet from the exterior boundaries of the property described on the attached appli-cation. I certify under penalty of perjury that the fore- going is true and correct . (signed) date Planning Commission Approved july I , -10- . t NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NO. JOB NO. PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS 11 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Sam Freed. - Planning FROM: Bud Engel - Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Proposed Street Naives DATE: April 11, 1977 The Fire Department has no objections to the proposed street names in Tract 8237. If these names are adopted, please let me know so I can advise our Fire Stations to add them to their maps. ' e NAME AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE NO. JOB NO. PARCEL NO. NAME ADDRESS C Coelm t? SHEET / OF / SHEET ENGII•lEE1Z'S t�o-rEs /N THE C/TY OF PALM DESERT, CAL /FORK/A RECORDERS CERTIFICATE I.5A514 OF BEAMIN44 14 TOC- LA.M15Z-1ET 6riV 7 ZOI�IE t'o CD�n►1Y of (ZIveiz4ipE . TRACT 8237 - 1 fled �t�is do 19� , G E OVND MDAIUM tit a� M• in I3ooK �o a4 qe 2. • I N D 1 A 5 fr >✓ AS S1AOW N ,ai -lane recbueyt a ou n CIeY � Z 4.SE-1 %,,x ' I oQ -TAKE F1.0 N,Aq pLL ,z zo ,,,�s BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORT/ON OF THE Fee W•D• Balogh,Count rZecor&y- Ul.e4,5- ojiAW14S NO-teo. SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECT/ON /6, T.5.�R6E.,S.B.B.&M. "° N SZ 5. TU14 ITZ441 eONTA.1V41 1.Z8 Attme4, e4 zo55. 6. LEAD PLv6 it NAIL•5ET IN GUFM OPPog►TE PROPEIZTY DECEMBER 1976 SCALE: I"= 50' 5ubdn .G'Iee Sa{ero Title- LOT CORNERS. PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE TE -CITY CLERKS CERTIFICATE I hereYxl certi-pq -m-at L am a Civil I, 6Yw0a Ic.6si1\:qqn, Acting City{ C1erK o-` Said Ci� of Engineer o-P the 5tdte o li P Ca -Portnla a 't th and -tN-Nai3 s MUn Deeri, do hereby, e-erfi-`g -1-ha� -1•w\16 and was map 4on3i8tinq o�p one 4 V) •5heet corneC+ly repsn reevS prs eented to the Council of Sa\d Ci+N o{' palm I a survey made unasr my i5upewision dori nq l&ser•F a t a reg vicar meetinngg *Inereop he\d C�n-the December o P 19-t to ; �hc►♦ all monurnet 5 Shawn /of,daq of =C s vr3w , d -that -there u?On 34i8 hereon cic+uo\1y 41nd -*-,etr Ct+q Council did by on order duly Passed and entered,approve correctly shown, or will be \n piece %Aii•tVnin one Said map and accer}+he cledicd+ion'r shower hereon . ! 1� S!_FAPT SIG/V/Jj t//►/�/_;i=/J ,�/-/����i t.7; ?�7!CT year -Prom reccedaAion 04' phis mapp.'Ch4 nnonvmen .5 �8� w/eo. 7, ,.—rAf '0. wi\l be sup-0jcien* tc) ewnable+he survey-to be retraced. Dated �h'S d44 0� ,19? 7 //4 �¢ ov)f-o.P Avw. oo.P. The ourvey i5 true and comple}� a5 hown . sw//. coe./,/ � Dated I�1 ,19 _ Sheila R. G;11igc�r� h G so'R/WPEPOEED Registered Givil Er�gineer No•►So39 Acfin Ci Clerk.�Pe'�TL FOGS A VArAlUG PEC FEd./O,/9G Q FO.R/R SP/K� � m �o AS 1niSTR.NO.lle99J �1•hl off` pa\m t7e5er-� _ /V.69°5/49Nw. 435.35 89°5/'497 w:3a4.J I LOT A 2x1 - 30 N AS/NSTR.NO•/32tOG W 9 sr.o0 m 77.50 77. 70 77. 95 IS �► ,� �'\2•\ 2;,` CITY ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE 1 \ �; 2 TAX COLLECTORS CERTIFICATE `� z e e- hre" ev+i•Py th�a} S havem examined -lfi m is ap v �O �l O �) 0 qj and -Pounck i� +0 be subsl-atTlia114 -the same n6 RK ( D appeared an -+h s -1-e rrta-i ive reap of Trec-k 8Z 3? I tueareby certif ki•t•Ind+,accor+d\ to *,r\ recocd� c� P! za�^r ;,dec, .,dod b -1�ne Ci _� a►PProve�d y '�y ,� :, 'tr'�is oPPiGe,a3 04 ii'1i2S date9."here nre n0 lien30, n Council an 14 October ►9'lto,-Ihe expira+;or) dateign beq }h r e Qropety Shown onihe v Ih;n map -Qor unpaid -3tatg, `` 30 14 Oc}obev I g17 tina� ull provision,,, o+' applicable 5tnte Law Couni�►l ,Municipal, or local ••raxe3 or Special 44 BD.OD t 77,50 7 •70 77.95 7B•20 N.89'S3'4B`E. ' _ 3/8.113 ar�d Ci1,{ Requldl-tot�s M,ave been complied wi-4h ; a,�nd Asse3oments e_ollec}ed as -t-axeI5. /4iP/r�rFoP sT��ET I I 39/.95 �+ S cm �catisVied -NhiS map is-technically correct. ` I JV•B9°534$"E43535 TAGGED R.C.E, Doted R ►� �- 1,3,/9" AS /NSft? �' I I I dzs¢I Dated /o � lg — q _ Cope"+'A Tox Collector NO. i 3 C�� Weer Q.[.E. 150[08 AVENUE 44 �� �� ^ i- AD. 2x2 OVER 3/4" I•p SWCDR•SE ./0 A0./3. 46,176'-715 SOILS REPORT A preliminary Soil 2eport was pre?nma by 5oiII4seology, and Testing Con-,ultan+t, Inc. on -i•he 17-vn-day of January, 1517 4-p reopired by ewe 5ubdivis%on Me? Ac-t. OWNERS CERTIFICATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We hereby certify tha-t we awe +1ne owr\er3 o-' +he land _state'oV California 35 included wi+hln the subdiViston Shown hereon;ihal•we nve_k%e only Courtly 0Q os prar-jon9 whose consent ie necessary to go-"aclear titre -to said land, on -eni-s --'-r' day of 5pNu(4AT ,I�j "-t , (afore me 4':aRtcAaA and that we conseM to the "wvinq and recordinq of chit, Subdivision ,N� MAP as •Ifi Shown wi4hin e colored border line; We hereby dedicate to rl '` a Na+avy Public in ar%d -Qor 5a\d County and Public.use for street purposes Lot A ; We hereb dedicd•t•e •ha Stnte, personally appeared li_� � � ' o�� known �o me y to tae +lr'i€�" liice •Pre-s•iden� GSY�cI (��;�rot=-�• i----`'' ;1c�r3m_: Known Public use -for Public u+il%.0 5idewalK,c�nd Street firee purpose, 'tc, me -to the-lane 'SEcr aY� �W of U5LIFE 5c►ving5 card o +ive -Foot wide eosemen+ esignoted hereon as ''S' P.V•>=." Loan A6,5ocia+ion ,-the Corporaliori that eXecu }ecl }we within inb+vUmen+ OnJ known -1-0 me +0 be -fie 'pergOn-r who execuAEcd -4'he Willnin i-r,5+rumenf on behalf' o-� SaicS Corpocok�arZ� and U5LIFE 5avirq5 ar,d Loan A53ocia+ionl acknowledged ib me -tha+ such Cork70Y—C -ion sxecu�d +he A California COYPard��Or\ "kv�_ w4hin inS�rumen4 pur uc%"� -ko i�-o by lows or n 1,Zeso\4ion cv���0� Vice resider, o� i�5 $oard o� Direc ocg. wikne45 rv\y hand and Of.picic,l 5ed 1 My Comm;55iori 1✓xPirey '�� �• , ��1`�� ,� ;; ., ;� :. �jECr aY\I ,C. .: Yn.yde.= •,�,�!�!,//J f�..-.+.t1'� ° ,+'�� - _ J 1,1041:1 Publ-\c tiin and -F'or 5did CounN and 5+n-• a �• °' s u01 - 000% _ _ - ., -. :rw.••. .,::.� , . �,,� . I I 1 . ��%\ It .� j . . . . ' ' I . ' * .,* . - I I . ,'J� .A I ,,," � - I I . . I. I . - I . - . . ( ' * ' . .f .��- . � . I "- ' I ' ' � . I '� . . I . I . I I,. I . � i - !11 '.s i . . . �1. , ,� . , . . j. ,- - , 1, I �\ . I � - '.... ;"I I � � . I I � �. " i 11 ;1 - * I i . I � ,. j, 1. '' . . .. . : I . I .\.-....�..-.�.-I II.I�I-..I..-II.II.I.II I I-II..\I�.1 I1'...�1 I-�'�I-I...I,.--..I...-II�..\....I II..II-I.I..II I.I�.I-II I I�...�.e I..IIII I I.l-.I.-,�I I1.I I.I�II II.,I.�.I.1I..II I�1.-I I�I.�-I.I I�\.II..�.I�..-"I II I-1I. .-.../�.I.\--.I�.II-.�I,I...1.1..N,II�-,.\��I..�I'.I..-��I"I�I��..'A.I. .�:A.I.'`.Ii'I..IIII-..I-1 I;.I 1.....�N..1I-II,.1.�.t..,I..I 1�I I"I.-...�1.�I.".1..�.II.�I..�.1��.�.�1I\..i I.I��.�1.�-...�....I I..I1 1-�.I,I.II-.......-.-I,.,....�..1.-.,-�,.I 1.-�.1.I...>I1I'I III1�.��-�I�1t�II.�.-IIL j.I1I�I'-�I�..II.�I-.-"--...I,'.I*�I,�-./.IJ.f"J�\.':1.�.'I��1.-,4 4.�-L.I'-�I;;,-."4.I�-V�I,',:i-A-.II.I�I�"',�'�T,�.�y�I"I 4�.�'"-'�"%I'..�.-�A�Z�-1,'"'A��%i.,'".:P-.:-::�1..,!."*I*T I1z��-' -,,":�,�:.0.-"..1��Ii-�,.�.;"-.-,It:.�'..�'�.�',"i.".1."O�I..II,,��..".'I.I,..��."�.I�,iI--1,i1 I-'':�.,""1,'i:.i,"f,."*,�z1,.-1I 1:,%--I..',.."",,_.'."..,.'"".1.I*�"-"-e,'..i�.o,.-�'�'*.�-.,,',:',..-...'.�I-'.�,,'...�I-.�.',,;.,-I;I.I:..I,,--'-I�-.,-"'��'-'..1...-....,-"�,.-:.�.1.'-:.�:'..'I.-'4"':."-t'I",,�:,f�',o'-.I''.�'�,'I..-I,.--1II.",".�I.�.�1.,1,'.��-:�,.'.7.-:I.I'.."......1�',",'-,I,-;z,�"i'�.'.*�--.�,'-:'":.I..'".,,I-­��.�,��1,-I--.'.1'�,-iI�:�II-..'.,��-,.,.'.-1,"��.��..�",'.�,1'I�-",,...--..''-''*.,,.--;-�.�1.�'1."',.1�,I�',��.-.:...I,:�.'".�.�'..I I:�1'�1.-�,...-�'II,.�-0I�'�f,%1"i..i II-4.-*;,'.--.,II I:''..,,1--.,,,-'I-I.�-�I:,,,.,�!-...."I1'I.I--,'.*I";..-',--.-.'.-'......:-:.�I.1 1'I�-.'�,'4,-.�,.'�::II7I i-.,1..,�..".'''."'I.�:..*.'-:,.,.�,�-"--I...t,.­�'.�,".1,..:I,.-'.I'.--I7....;.,.-,1.'"",I�,.".�'*,��--�1,�,I.,�-:,-"-,.S..�",;�. I-4.�,..:,,,-..-..,.�..IIII-'I;..,,-;.-�,.I,,-!,.-.�.:"fI z'-I I,,"-!1-�1 1'-I..�"-l-I..�1.",..-;:--.,..''1-'".1,".',,-...1:'--....,,,.,'�,,I.-,..'"�"-.',zI-.�.I-�.1:�;.,,",.1�..''I..'"".,�':�."-I,.,I".,,,..-�'�,.�',.I,�I�,,.-,I.,�'I.�k:-I�.�.:.,.-,�.:�II�',.�..II."-i,�..:.::�.:.-.!..�'I.t--..,'�,�-..",-I....­--'...-:p�.-.I�....." '',�-,.7'�',:,�.�.�"''.,.1.��..,II.,II...7.�,'!�t..",...,III�"I',...I.'�,I0."�"'I%..-"',---1...1'..-'":I.I".-�..'...'I*'�.%-.%'`.:I.""I.II�;.,-..'--".II.''1"L...,,...,�I.,.:�.-,.�.I.'..,I 1.��'r.-�.,'-',1.�..,,I�,,%,".'-4.�I.,.1I�.I..'-,..�...-,�.,"�'.:.I I.0��.-.I/II.1:.-II I-,III;.I. ,,,...(I'"Z.-�.I I".I'*I--...K I.7...�.I"��'I I....,',--.I--I-,-II..�I.�,',7,�I�.I II.I,-,,-'.1.).-".....:1".�-..:.�i�I-"/�I1...1�.O'-.�;1...Ir.I,:�11,,�'N..I�"II.I l�-.�..1j�-e I0,-.-e.N.�I ep��,-I,.-.-'",'.�,7.�'.,-..�. .',-.;^.I-."s�',.,t\�.,,"'',�.,,,�I i-I.�-,\I"�".I.........1-"�FI...,e;.,,1-I...�.1.�'1 j�,I�0.�..1/.1II I,�-'�".1�'...%--'II1�1..:II�,AI.I',-.I . . _ . ' .I�IY1 I-��I� .'/. II -- I'j . tI I , r ,, ' % d 'p 1-1..I,/..0N.�",..I.-..f;��I,zI 1 1!I j",-.'-1.,I...I0�..��..I.�1.�I'1,.I.I4 I..�,I j-.s-.''�,'I'.�.,�-,I-�I-.-1 q.,I,;.I,-.*.:1x I"..,...,:I,'1I.,'I I\.I I I f,I I�I.I"..�-,,�7tp,.I II..I�;II-1'�/I.I ."...�'./--I/'',�..I I.�1..�'�-1�.,-.,i,I.I1I.�.I�*I.�1/,-��!-I,-.11.�N-..I-..'I,.'.,....I.�,-��,1�4.I.,�I.0...'%�'..0-:-I I1-,�,:��1:t..I-.-1 I.".-"""�I��0 . q ' F i , z .,,,L�.-,.,I 1..II�...I,'!I�I../;...,.'-1,",--'"�I.-,��I%.I I/�.:I 1../,I.,I,.,I I?��o,,,�I 4-3��.�,0;'I.,"I.II..�O.;,'N I""',.a-�-..�''��.;'.1.'I\%�\-"-*.1""�i-.I;,t'11 I�?�-,!'"I'''.-..-I�,�..,,.."'::.",o IA,T)-�.i-III..--;I--.''i,.*I.,,.I.'�I'..-�.1;I,---,'�.7.,,,�:-I�.'I-,."..I.-.,I,.�t-,,I II-:,4.1 1-\,..-,'I..,-"'I).i"I�"--.1.-I\.,0-"',�I.-I,;,.I'I, I.14-:I..:.,..1I II,.,I I I I,,.-�.�I�.�I..',"',"�..�,.I.,..��-,,,II I".I�I�,o:t*NI�.�.'.,.,Il�I.�I.I 0.,,..�1 I.'-,I' .,-��.�i-�/I;.�1,.�."...v�e 1..1..�,,"I tI�1..,.,.�,.I I'.t 1--�-,��/'Ii I.t�"'..�I'�;4�:,,,%­*"..�.��I�-'-I 1I_*�,.'�*..�.I. �I-�'*!��t,'I-I.,'1Ii1.�,I I"�!0.f�,.I..I1-,I-,I, 1. y\ 1i :, I1 I'-I. , ; p J I . , 1 x _ ...,,_. - 1,'.v r i'•, � , i _ 7. J . , .n - ' . 5 l �-�' - . . • - • ..• e. p ...ice .. .. � ... .. ? ;:r-t I 1 I 1 a. .. _ ,. r' , . T• dn:; , .. - .::' . , 1. q: ,yew 4 j : }v -a - '. • I r { LL .I I.I.;�'140:- !/�,-"!:I i�I.�LI,'�''/"1-.�.I-,.I��I.I..-,,I..f I..1���'"I.1.�1..".�.�\1I.I.�;'.-.�',1'.I .I�-I i I�".1-�...''-�,�.�i-..M'.�'....-0.­."�..'-,..��,",I-,I.f;�-'�q,..I.I.j�;1.�,I,,L�,r1 i I V . . . - .. r . ,it-�I-I:;,I-1'�I',.I L.I1�.I�,�II-1;*1 1.�.I'1--�.II.I--'I.j�,.�I'1�i,7I:,i;'I� I�.I..II=#.wt V,I*I.�',I'.v.'.�I-�"I,1'I.1�I.4� I-'I.�-_��.11t I.I.I��.,'..1-I IV.�,��...�.-.�..�'.1.-,I..-I'1'I....��'II.�i'-...I��.II'�,-.-�.---.III I..,I-.I, �4.'..�l-.I�-l.*�I--). II-'�I*.�kI."--q I ..�' b ,,,' i' - . yyy . . - •. . ,' '« , . ._ :: - y, ti� -4 t I .... . { I• . . 1 , ,: - - # 3 • �, �� '. ,' ' f. . . , , -y n, , ( 't;. p _ w -II,r,�oi,�v�L I-1I I�-'.,.111.-..''I I,'�.�,,-.,..A'':I.f,,'�t".i."�,,',--'-,��/'"�,....,:1�I--I-�,wII i ' i�.�`t`!- '' _ ...---. » .•,...w+'.a+4n ,ray,....;,__ � ...»...rr ..: a 1 b xi _ .,w t 1' 1• .v 1. "'.;1 l I. aaw:'..+_`, 'k•r •#++ 3 i.. f ,,._; e�. �, r f ) , -..., , '. , .r. :. y, : .ivy ,tr„ - ... - d/' - .'.. ., �s, A;. ,, ..�• , I. .-iK... II c, a q 1 f j. s 1' /y`� \ f x a..3' 1 9y �. 4t-fit'•"` ; .,t. - Ii t .A I.... . '` ) j 1 f i l -.w, • 'J; A,s `\ r•_ "c, , `Ar, . gS-b c^'.'" +'- 4 r ` r� , , C �' ,•. :` , J r 1�.1f�""'�'.'�rllriYlY.IW..••.__ '. _ •, _ _ - •• Y 1 - 1 ,.. .., t j .•. 1 _ {. , , ., y , , , 3 ' 1 ,, .11::. 4' _ .. ref_, F 6. F 1 } y . . # � l ) ;+ a /// d Y Jr.' w.�•• 4 MnYs y , 'i f J r `' \., „.-rIr�i.. "-'p'- wT -""I1.1-.+wF-fir i � t -'- - -'- _ I t c 7% ,,,,t' } II 4�"lI�"''I I!I-',�A�"';�1�it.�.,4��T tI i',,A,.�.��:'-t,s%4I�I't,""1k't.-oI14�..'�.-Li,�r�",��.�,,yI�''i 1.';k?I 4. v ../-1�W-,�'.1-�''�I�',� u k".II��;Z-�.�1.1�,II�i,,'�-"1:I-I'-I�'��'',C-i.0?.I''I-.�4,.I:.�'I-...�1..,'1.'I-.-I",:*i-'��.I't 1Y I-'-I..,-',II,.�----'--..".',6....I'-,t,,A,,�.-.',I,...�,"--1.,,&I-,I,,,..--.--'L,�M.I..I'.,�"�oI I-.-*,.!I',,'.�I'-'�n-'1i-,'I.-'1I.--.-;1"0.�I-!I I.k,�"�16.-I-..1I I'*I.�,I�:,��...,"..�,��I.�..I-;7�1'-,�I��I�I-�.j.!j.�I1 I',I��'-"'% �".-.I I',.I"IO,..-q-."i4 1I I.,.�..I�-4-..�I.I�0;'."V.I.n�,�I1--_...�.��II..--�.'L:I'...I�:';.�',.I"..�I.;I.�-.I\"1-...-:-�.II,..I I e Q 0.II.II�-1.1,,...1.II,.I.I..,..I,,�I I1,;,,�.0-,,,I.r'',.,,.�--..I'-,v1-.I1.II,�I�I��;I..-�I jI I�f 0 I,.I'1I-�';II.%�'.:I��I'I�..�I-'I1.1�I".�IA.I!,,1.:.;.I-iI I1-�'.I�1.-I-v.1I.'"r.:*,,I-)'.�,I i,1.I,-,:I,''1�I.,-..t tI A.*1.,II.I".i�...I,.*�I I-1:1 I1I1:'',,..,�...:..�.'*I.I..,'--.,1;I�m A..�":1�-*,I:1,."I I�*�..-.-1.1I,I I.'-4,'-q�I'a.I',.I�,.I,-..".7.)I.--I-'..I.I��t.;�.I.,.IIII,I.'�.�...I I'..�1I-,I��.:1 II�.,.�.�-�I..',I.''.i1!CI,.,i�.,.v�.�1 I.-�(.,�...�.I-.��t'...-�!',.-'I!i;�,-�. 1 11 oJr L '� ` : ! L , ' J• '. » - J C a . .- . _ :-_ { �'- ..- �/' 1 a F , .. "Tb t e+d _ ___._ I ' . a. -__ ' _ _ _ •'1. .. a _ - - .. i{ / , _ v 'a (l V n + s . I T sW .•♦ . ' - �.% ' I r ti+r I , � `. ,. i�', . F.iy - .r+YI', •� SAY,.. '' .''. i. {., _., `` -. -- -- -_---- ------------- --- -_. _-- --- - -- - _ --- , - - - - - _. - - - -- _ _.. j r f f . , ii I 11'"'�r�-.+ t .M .�'• _ r vi _ •,„ „t'••1•JI• J••'�. - _TT: W 11'i^� Sr I • i u r _ i . . • r , ` 1 / i1 , a t y I . .S .--.- -" ...;e ' y ., . ' R r i 1" I. t . . . a .' ,�._.._, ,r,._ .• -II`-...t.�.�.",..I0I o.-.�,�-..."..��1 I",,I� .,vv,.11'.f.,II I'Z 0,.. ."C�?.I�t�1I*1��-t.4�..�. +�`\ /f. ./--I ,. - 5,.t#p,.y kd{ .t p b 'wtl I,I •~ ~ - , , r '.p 4 t •� -� . I A .- I _. • a a Syr I ' ", �"I.;,-I./.1I�..'tI.)I 4I�;f��-I1."t#1-,,,44�-...".,I�-I�' 'I it . ' � � . -- , V,,, . r` >:���- - --- I ------0-F--W ( - I . \` - ---�f------�--".!, - - --- " 11 ... 1, IN THE Cl T Y OF PA L M DESER T, CA L IFORNIA SHik T / OF 3 SHEET 3 TRACT 8237 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF .THE RECORDERS CERTIFICATE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, T.56., R'.6E.. S. B. B. 61 M. filed this�da of PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS MA Y 19 77 a'=-"�`�'�' `� ��k at the revuest of the Cannty Clerk. Fee �' wo. Bo ogh, Ccrrnty lrorder /73 LOTS 53.SB ACRES' oeputy 7t . OWNERS CERTIFICATE ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE CITY CLERKS CERTIFICATE We hereby cei/ify that ^,e are fhe owner) of the /and Inc%rded w/thin / teilby certify A100t /am v RegisterM Giri/ £n9inler of tti! State of /, Shei/o k Gi//igon, .Octin9 City C./erk ofsold City of �/� OlSert the subdivision Shown hereon; that we ore the only Persons whore CW7S0nft California oral that this naop Con5i3ting of three ,3.)Sheets correctly do hereby certify that this rnop was presented to the Council of is necessary to ass o clear tit/e r1v sold /and; a.►d that we conse�nf to th! rePr�'lents o Surrey i»odt under any Superris%orr during "ay of 1977; said City Of.Po/rn�rt of o regular meeting thereof held on rnakIng and recording of Th/s Subd%r%sion MOW os Jhowr7 sv/thin the colored I that a!/ rr+annnjents shown hereon actually exist and their positions . fhe1L'--' ahy of i912 and that thereupan sold C1'1y Council border lint; n'e hereby a1ed%cote to 0 J 4011C use for street purposes Cots ;4" art c'or're+ff/y shown, or lull/be in,v/Ole wrtfiin one �/e�or from rlC�datio%r did by on Ordsr duly possed anal e�nfered, approve Sold n}op, and thru O� irnc/usire; We hereby dldicote to Publ%c use far Rib/it utility, of this whop. The rnonumenfs will b! suffAcien!` to enab/d the .wrvey did octe/st, o tfho/f of he pry /ic, the foregoirq dedicotiav�� sidewalk, and Jtrlet tree purposes o fire font ividt eOJerr�ent deS%gnOtco' to be retraced. The survey i$ erne and corny/ite 415. .Shown. Doted thlt oy of AereOn os `S',a/E"; .✓e hereby dedicate to Oubl/e use for public Pork and open Jpoce purposes Lot 173, 9 She�io R. 6i//igan AS a Condition of ded%cotion of Lot i6I"(O�e►p Canyon Road) anal Lot N"' Obled �-�—• R xitereo, civil Fn ineer Alo. 10039 City Clerk (Magnesia Fo//S RG�Od J, the owners of Lots d2, S3, //9, /2'0 tlrru /2d, 1SL, City of po/m Oesert 153, 162, 143, /70 ono' 173 obutt%ng these! highrvoys and du-11^7 .Such time wi// hove no rights of OCC0ss who/ever os Such exClvt thy! genera/ easement of trove/. Any change in alignment or width tho/ results M The vacO;Alon thereof shall te►rrr�inofe this Condition o! access rights os to tree poet vacated. !/SL/FE SovingS and Loon .4ssocivtion, A California Corporation _ .Senior Vic re i`rlde r S 1 . T CITY NC I NELe ' CE'R F A . w A X O Cl �E . � COL-LECTORS CTORS E CERTIFICATE Sec'refar .. ' '. . / hereby certify that / hove exons%ned /hiJ rnoo a� il�'i►�hsNb � / hereby certify that occordingy to the records o! /Als DffKt. Subltont%al/y the Same of rt &ARvOrtd on the fenfotiri man of rrec/d�'3� .- os of this daft, fhere ore ..v /ienS ogoinit the property shown 'tmt os filed, d~1Wed anal oppiOred by the City Counci�/ on i¢ October /976 On the w1Thin i»op for unpaiD State, County, Municipal Oi Lora/ .> oxpiiofian date bd%n is Ac1'obtr /977; that o// rovisions of opo/icob✓t taxes or s CiO/ 4JSe13�tnt3 co/%�c1td o /ox er 7 " 9 p a s es, cent taxes , :$> ' _ seatr /oov one Cl`ty Regu/.slia►73,/rove ordpor Carsplil�d i✓ifh; anal /airs w p- s,�c�iv/ osslss�nlnts�o//tcted as loxes now`a %ien _. Sof%sfied this map %S technico /y correct . � %#rc"yr payable, w►A/C,4 oei L'Stirr,otee to bed'/� ioo_ A^ ACKNOWL EDOEMENTS ' + Stole of Co/ifornio ,Ob/ed � Z�. f/unfer Cook Doled AdGvs>��'1tg�Z count of Los ,4nye%s S.S- City Eilg%nee r` RC4C. /sObd y .� C� ,&rtn& &Lt er AS&,W__ C Count rox Collector On this 9 00ay of y , ,�9 before r»e �r Cnl y S tJ M rk eds a Notaryy l'u is in anal For said County ayrd state, perso>,y// appeared 14 e R(k et 3. (4 o cS�oo n! known to lire to be the Senior Y%ce Pt lsidehnty ond�� N�E r►t C. R o "�S known to me % bi the Secretary a/ US 4ife Savings anal Loan 05oclat/an, fne Corporation that executed the Within instrur»ent and known to /the to be the persons who executed the iv/th/n InJtru.nent on behalf of sold corpora/ion., and acknowledged to tyre that •wch Coorporation executed the within Instrument purse nt to it's bylaws or o.Peso/atibA of /t's Board of DirlC tars. Wifness hand anal Official Seo/ My Camrn%S$AW7 Expires PrPAi L _ c��N.:�t z- •, Notary Public in and for sold D Gc17 "_' ,' county and Sfale a`MTARY . - l. . SOILS -REPORT T - - - - �` . ; .�, ,.. OIL E TAX BOND CERTIFICATE fv$M 4d 1. �es1 A pre/irs�inory So// Report was ,orr�i�d b! Sdit,GM/ogy, errd r4r5m q !hereby certify flW o bond in the Burn o�loos been Conscu/fonts Inc. on the /71h day oe do~ary, /977 as re4vireor by Nee txe¢•uted and fi/id with the Qoord of 5U,00ivi?ors of she C~.Oy of .w Subdivision �tloA Act. R%vl's1de, Ce"fornio, conditioned upon >'he poyrnlnt of al/ foxes, y ,. �'. Er►9inet r CAar/ts N.�)ris>lon S5'cte, Cavnty, Afuntc/pol, or Local, and all special oasessments collected os taxes, wh/cti of the time of f///ng of this map wif/i the county Recorder ore alien o9oinst Soid property but not yet 2Yj30 _.._ payob/t snd soil bond has been oppreved by Soid Board Of SuoerY%So►rS . SITE ,ell TLEDGE.q%E• Dots '� DAIfOJd O. Su/J%VOn t county elerk and ex-oltrcio ocsc,ir sr�R�`•� '.,� C/erk Oe the Board of Supervlsars _ r a EASEMENT HOLDERS OF RECORD ey: `� _Deputy Q Q Nome: J � I t v v _ 0 ers� VICINITY MAP PALM D£3£RT, f.4L/F"ORN/h 942LO � - UO/ -0003 O IN THE Of Y OF PAL M DESERTo CAL/FORN/A SHEE T 2 OF 3 SHEE TS o --- '--�" - ��o.Pr,04AAYE A - TRACT 8237 l BEIN�3 A SUBDIVISION OF A SPORT/ON OF THE _ a oEr�i� 4�• �• SOUTHWEST OUA RTER OF SECT/ON /6. T 58.o Re6E.0 S.B.,B.5 M. Tyo ''PACIFIC R/Ail. ENVIRONMENTAL ENOINEERS M"AY, /977 East Ltna Inst. Nb 78729 Rec �2/162 d/ 346 4o I7.4S¢o" za906 /SS S4 - /nt�isrcf/on e© •lSOoo 15'.I31I" !07.7d' 0410 N.TS. � `U F • 79 41500 SC•Zd'46 Sl , !�6i _! ' i3•K d�f 7d e7500 Zo"I/f- /t.K_ 435 73 S-ZS-.0-0-- Z-T--•-1-¢--e-S---` --t_-0---6--_79- =--/-O-¢-7_S - •fT`! .'r�•' \ V ,'l �� L gg�3 s � o_ :. � . 1lW.6f }7T 94 7 ¢Soo e2•sTre 65/6 39 d Y /7op� , 173 741 SZS OO 9'Sd X? 9/ 6 aS79 & Arew r..F7 AiAnr s4 . hf > �: :+M 7 '% <eaNKEr RuEJ75 4So0 IfS'Os ► \ /Sco% 2 41 a o Z5 00 ea-fix ZSo.00 30•Z6•4e /974r4 6e03 - A y►ri+' ^r. / ` .\ �; /�� �,i, t� /7 ?;� t� y �R'' .h�ii`4�/ < ���s ` <• ^ 4. 69 /GitSeO _0,53 31•' A `�'4 ��/�` o•ab'trVE 0740 / (,d GS.00 //r•13Gb- /27ed- 976E/ F 72 {�• � `C 7 QD j a0 _AC 24` 4/.�b Zl07 \ �" ��3 1' �' •~+ ~ r J� •y\ [ 98. G7 9s rf' _ _y_ ,• � ,,�tRi , � 1 9 ' �T s y -- - Nozo •os'rs-s G6 `S.OrO Z7•/7'se" iv f7 -- S,d ( \ i d z o �,� 4� o\"" 39 f, a7, - qv 6s 9s6 so /e•3/'/6- //i 9S Sc _ -_-- -------- - ---- - ---- :;w �w�rs '►- o . . �'if '� r / \� � .9 � � �• � ,; � st Ir -�oo- 7e.ao- -rcoo- -6soo- `�° « :3VSf.40 /6•;2'ZS" /Gk�00 Sa3S . �. �... \ � �\ �!✓�/ � uw :--�:{d•i� o' � � �a� o�j/ •i. I ,• v. �•\` /VK/ ,�//� ���� // / 63 Gsoo �•4l'rr <sse t37Z j J?z `6 2/ '' d�< yd• _ •' \� ti % r I y, �' u' I( I y 6Z JK40 S•/O'/7" S Sd Ot9 pa -to. g �' /o/ °v .i /OZ p,w y o h 6/ fSQ7- !Z !Z'11t' 31G SI /e97 { ♦ M ap 4 hrt, •o \ / S•/ s /it .�\ O f� �' r. a. ♦.r� n /4 vle► v h •� .\ i,/±r A b M 40 3<6 40 /Z S4 S9" 770e !d 70 �;. 9 /70 / Z 4 S9 9SGl1 /9•SO'!/- 9Ie9 !6 6! OM, ram. (� 710 to l •� °+ v1.s. er'ZSY O , q Sd Z7T 00 /3'O/'Od Lt.49 ?i to `Y /' _ _- �"i y� v t� 4 .t•:r�2s.. �.4. oe',rs.� r. Q _ -'�. " -/ ?!- '. ... r ¢ b• / � ��S.! O �r Z ,L ?t.U 70_00 �70.00 70.00 dlO,ft v 57 Z7S00 4•15'aZ" f0.40 /Qr0 .'7�t`, �� Ssdt / a Ste"` `?rE?7 �� rp i� / ice re �Q,.7 )+' _ - `- Y/ Z •+s•os'ts Ise s9 _ o .�/ , .q`, ,1'„ 0 v ft io eo zo.oo rs zo .37 j . S6 s5.'00 2V U3led' Tyr! !/ei • � NO•/9'To-s i .h �� N �' i� lilt f, ;1 o•oi !s"E a�sr.0 r C f vo•ot 1p. i 40 \ v /r �- wl o •. obl 55 OSM Is 33'IV' •7S00 lest` \ VA r1 V�rs. t- - !` :�_ p _ t� b�f a•;,�- sd �� ti� . o `�'� Sa yfs00 46.3509� 3�.50 /9 37 ^•+. -� ul LOT Z".• L o s'i 6s r!1: v �j�j ,vo•os rs-E �► p h I . "° /� t� �1 �.�: • - C Q M a o 1 ° a1 8► 67 e,�, /6li �) '.� h 1� v. ti S9 4SQ7 06.1.109" 3•:.S9 - ' 4o.a10 ` n dJ'Q�• v // 9¢ !d^ M. D �,. � ' ' ;� ..3�• � I !°`/-' Cp p1.,. ,�•1 � ? t' �1 �, � { i /1'Lid' / SOT_€Gl7 • i Sfii �► '•J•6 §' w � i$ /� � 2 `'• Mti,,• •'�,. fa iti 0 St 4S.X 9/ z4r t<s7 /r.6S ! •s/� �i N o ,yi$ $ ! E Q- �;s� Q y s -- L'•+ � •A6't!'E NO'06'=S`y� +K r A �/� 2 �D i < Y• �� '� ��� 1,. •r Vda/2Q-id o st f \ •t u h tS fS si aSao fo•o4•s3' 4719 � tic.of •�" -' sCJ / ` lL sa ssae 4t 93.4e" 35 oo ll . v M �• : � 3 t --1/r�z �- {� .�� th w2 , ti G3 �,. 109 rve•e�'ts-E /L9S� 49 4soo 77•J9'P9" 60 f9 S6 t2 !•'\ :1 / 'a , al ! t t aN SO0.00 /d•SO Af /6495 _d3Z3 _ r"•. ti• - ise _ q�'ZS'E-� � .. Q 4� - - �1 �,,, .va•os•zs•EaJ p i - -- - - - _,_ gar as of if E -- -- - 47 aS0-G10 G•9e.00` St./t 2f o9., �` .� - is T D bC _ w y _ /�� - - - --- -- - ;•. ' �tssas ( a a-ia' ,ao-oa rs. •= ss-ar/w!' Lot' Ai6 9S� /6'SOOib- Z79/ /4 �• i.C+ �O•oa CS T.- C.y -� ♦ ' 6000E 70G1D w - .{. o . fo ZB ti cc \ 17 h y 45 45.00. 37.32 f4- Z9 49 -/5.3� ty - ,� �^ • as y i pi t 4 • 3 - /!! `L. . . aP .�, t � .td .. c IA I ; Iw .9Z ° 4 i' 44 .0500 e3 y t' E, P.`` �- 6 /� �' s -- _n• b• - _ - - ter. itry >> r_.a •: • ' . r •► O ` a • ., } .i "J.'.. If rt7" 4S' !t ,� _ s._ ��' . e� � , ,v Di•YS- - p os s � b.� Z . � S� _ .__,.c+.. 3•- 99. �ti •y G h. ..�in O .� '� �. - - i •� ""- .a`� rwe.. Lc v <SOO iV'9y �► o�zs E ap. r • . ., . ,lSCO' /d as � � '� 6 .,', � r r rs � � • : , �/ f � '� --- -- - - - e• s i Q/ QS.AO J'S'46 :7<" 59S/ �'OZ M i 4 - �:ti� • I E. 17 ok .fir $ ~ � ' - - - - - - - / - /t ls' -AEr.�u 3►` l f y 9I '�tl o 40 45.00 7S O7%4" 3900 9460 . f.(L'T 0 \ e } 1 n w �? /�0 �' - , � 6e.wo / ' _iAI so -- _J 2 !� R� O, ti 00 70.00 _ 7SZJ 7 /3i.�S a -49 05,400 e7 sere- _z�e� //!a . Q' _ Z i �- ,--- -- e .� ve•os rs z�zaa ; rtAfe KE60 +^' l=!Lo /tSN vo'0,6 23'E3eS Z 3d ofsw 47W o 10' -7722 - - /9.75 _� ^. r �? �710 is ve•ob is ws-as rs- ` r + vo os'iS_E -- -- N rvI•os 2s- w•ew rsY ; 7 37 a5,10 47�Z f 52' !7_20_ - 19.7_4 '.- �.rs" � 73 � ` -- - - � ieo LOT-; o e O p� - -- f�f' , . PALM/ LA , C/RCLE 9O //2 ° $ /39 g"., /�4 8 � p o. S_/'!9 cif 23 !t<Z. ✓ - Rio 00 tea,oo -3e AFT 71 - Bt r3 o f71r o ! • /5/ a /� Ole ►- ~ w 1`��� 4saa 44.3�Oe• 3S.OO /e 44 .�" ' _ ,ti. h '^ 2 •� /X a cerise • - - - -- - - Q Qy' M I? ro•os is ? No• !t' o--Ts 3j ssoo sa � 3s of !t is ,' -sG 1� '�i Z �f '+ •mow a 75 $I „ o �. ,/ 70010 70`per M 7/ �i h` 72. O .73 w'''{, /Y ^ ; � ;� ` /�� /Y� O; I\\-i000 70 oo'C� Fd / a oo ss=aeao- use - ieso + + h 0 �ti ti,. ja Z;� t. f �9 //,� :s E •, /jvg, --- - -- - - - , _ 2 • M ^t/fI /t/i0 . F n .✓O•o6'u'E 4 tS3 . f r1 ,0 4500- 7,7 Tj 1S" 60.9! 96./S \\\��� t w �'ts-! ��, �, i 0_sue 2 we•os =s-e vo• s'r E /t/r60 /td►fd L i "'� _- _ Z1.Od /e69 1 . -�oE 1/?,' 2 i- ? !y :o° k , �+a•oc'ts ve•os rs L �,8r!��� rs� /srrs LAN ;'wr ZA 9S.o0 /614f:39' Z6IV - /e S4 2, I H e -- 7G. $, 2 /rt SS v z 27_3s J; - s o Z7 /s/s.00 0•e4 4i• _-1�9 -9 e7 .7 /s - -- •- "'� /37 °;. /4`6 0 3 � �� �,�'' +•� � �,., n ?ZS.00 /7.4o'S¢- G9.44 95.00 r 26 we�•63'3s"w i43 ¢ 1 /as�.n / � � � -.;Wf, tS SZS.BD /1/9159' /2-!c _ G.4! t6 �V/Z•o9 tf /00/ *47: _ _ , - �. /rro14 �re•os rt- re os rs- �., _ 9w SZS-a0 7 4d'3S" 70J4 34..ZL Z4 .vo 06'Z3'E /lS9 A s� t si ��� .� 77 .f QA�i1lIC/A m��o.PLA ., /49 tilg /SO�ti� /S/ f3'2 -- _ _. o +•, .rj a o< rs �- LoJ'6• �•�. . !a " /3G Y1478 a, 13 SZSOD d t0"49' . ► �,.�'tS F 6/SO SO ,v ?6 04 0'6c) SZS.00 s•i3'o3- 47e/ r3 fz ZZ AV* 6tSZ ! �► Awl -oc''aa E niro n 49 {.v7� 0314 h!%e � /ti.i/ I . - - - Z /� 1?- - V NO Of'tS"! A100 ` 70.01! 1 TSIO A!/ p/ /12G./S /•Z9:f0•• 3204 l602 2/ .V0'061t5'E _ t.St Qd .v32 09'_-V iIJA7 ie.o0 se-f 5•Glt'OY .06 ,4 1l.fls 20 rVs3.0.f't1"E tS�S aT .v/O /0'!f E,•r) OC �y O B {0 $ 4 d I o b w � '�ao•os r� sl�.l7 }� 4et' q 4'115m a r9'S9' S?oS /f 03 /9 rvo ei6'ZS E Z.90 t!. t 2e'/e:�, h k � � - h !d ¢5.00 /9•Sd'K• /S69 - -7l3 M ,vo•oc'ts"E YTI! 45 .vrS•/3"2I'�vr.tl T ti I ti v� ►,` 2 /�0 �`a /Z9 ! S� "1 its 77 t!" /itid Itff 60. e 4 6 -- - - - -- 44 Ne7.06'toE,%r) - - -s-- � ( rrsfa .%A °` �y ► t o „��11��/7 4S.M S✓'/O'st- 40./'9 ti SS / No 06'IS"E /.So oi'ts'•! a wo ec'r - ao oc'rs"E �=_ _ e o -- ----- -- 43 ems'// zs iv -- ? Z p 'rs-r A rs� 0 0' 1 /07 so � .T' AM Z` /G aSO�D S/eww s0-T7 ?/.66 /6 &SZ'f-s'//E 26.37 ►1 y /s asori slooac a- 1909 ?Dd7 0 /S w0'o1L 'ZS E lS9d 4t .VeS Ti?t ElrrJ79 � _ 1� ��ir $ /��. �i � �; i ,vo•oc rs•E i +i 1 a�I V A OW A" SD'/d'01- 39 S/ Z//3 'R A/Gi oo'S7"/✓ - - 4/ NQZ•t7'AO EIPJ R A * +, � 0 77 , °► _ /4 _ _ 4S.4e - ._ :re•os'as 3 ss cs"E ,/ h `F �o 'o s3� y / 45.00 tc't9K" /ZK O9S /9 rVsf'00'S7'/Y - -- 4d A/7d/7C7 NIPJ /Z?_SZ I , i� I /3r.60 itJ!fo ( { /�Y ., /� y h� �J� tw` ,� w :�' N V _ /(DQO jg VS°594_Z/vc'P) . E Ne•Oi'ZS" Al• !f' h . J 2 • 1f --1 �Z'�'"IS a `► `� /Z 93A0 !r2•!3'1'f- sy9d 2774 _ ao•GK ZS E /T9/ ?d a3S'o7'A!-„� /! 477.Gt0 /0•34 /o e799 a¢/z - _ �3 ,,, 7_s/_E d0-�/� :^I�., ° � °JS . « 8 /r17 $I ss.s.� KIs K, _ +v //_ NSS ltrsl w _ _os 37 93 O ?3at �,r � ,@ j _ b y. AO 4T1OY! 7•/t't6' 60.La 3Q04 /d NS3.4e_STSE(u' /d!./ 3f /v32•SSOi"w -?7eS „ P N vo•os rs'E rrm w as rs 2 v 9 477A? 7•/t'IS' 6o-a0 sa o4 A 9 d'E9•s3_ "ty _ 9 cc 3Cs •v"'00 si= ss.4d s3 � '�;� /:f v rs a•o s'tE- Jrn7 sra a --- - -- n/e•o6 r Z . c d -0770r0 711rsW" 6/76 30.At a Ars9•S3'3S"t✓ 9.53 3K NA9•S�'3S",� /564 "v vo•os'rS"E r- o OiOi'ff-f - • ID ..� • c_ f � S <}�<sr o� �•s. i 7 546.40 0W Id' S2.9S Ps.S.3 Z 7 NO.OS'M-W 4739 J MO'04'//'E - 3f.O1 .t/ `� . i0 IL /-a�ao0 I VAis -irk ztsc 6 346.40 94wS fd• S9.03 219.SS 6 NOS IM'Zf d'O 33.9/ J A/SZ•SS/! 'E 3•d.6. b �/ * h ' S 4f75"-00 7 47'4G" 44.63 9Z.37 S Ns2 93'Id"rV a/.d0 3! NS3'Ai'1!t"h/ ll_O_3 ��-- Ju - --• -- ---- -- e yl �• V' '� �,•S� -�, NO.Oi'ts � � ti �M -M h � ►h� �9 � b,t� Q 4yY�# 4 475.00 9.45'4e• 00.94 4d.S7 4 v-ge 4'S4-E /1./e� 3p �<s 37.97 E PDA3 �, rp �r , ��, �,, �? - ; - - -- o,�,o �-:� �{ o� fi /Z'O /Z/ K !2l «;., /Z3 •� /24 •,,� '� ti� 3 . 3 a7soo s•aS're' 7z6o .76.77 3 ,v i'c16'4f/ .ss.is t9 Jvey s3 31-,✓10 . _ 7tl 161. o,, y a a , •• w,, • --_ ZdCd to ,v/•9d'aa'Av 24l7 � � V.� .• � w •+ti. .. ., . . ` ,,' Z Z75.00 /e'a�6•/Z` 6r.e9 3i Sd t ass ss'es"w L?2 �� ?cs; //�' r, � • 4 /Z5.$1 1, / 4/0.00 S•is'G10' ?7S7 Af do / 1v fcs•o6'Zs"E rs.re Z7 M44'01'S7'•/t/ /6.r2 /o 00 bias GU Dle/to(d) t /<7 � •� 'Pf Ts 7scv CURVE DATA L/NE OAT.4 L/NE DATA 3. cAr s C.!f _ - `4 x! 139.t0 s09�7 �► ;� ..` . LOT 7cI � - --� - /Ioi. s .- -- C.�4 secJc ToW 840 East Swvsct.K 3�_ D 'P CANYON Ae2--'�E ROAD !/o/-O©03 _ Ad® SHE T 3 OF 5 SHEE TS S WA4 ow csft- /i Fd® Cf4 de . /!o. M T 1t�lONU EN AT/ON 30'R/w for Stree!,purposes •tbN. /O. ClQESC. TAB, GIEPTN REF, T�5/ER `. f .l /f4-/P. C• Suer. %s Cor /.3 A49 7713Z NW Cor, SWf4 SK/6/sre /s7J De+ed recorded Aug. /9, /936 ` `t�. / B '05 Retwr RCE/d039 054tp None Cenftr sec.14. in fval wnd in Qaok 292, oogr 233 (�j C 0"LP None 0.5 BNB 45149 SW COr Sew 16, in mOn. we// ' � 2 Y • 1 D. 3/Q"LP n(or7e Z.O Co. Tits SE or, SWAO Sec 16 i t / ` + I / I'7 C.. N L.!E Ef� `;�.�f I. 4 E RR S,oikC nhne A!Q II�s7 .4crepled for lnt. / ; 1v /-p. RCE GZ84 0.03 w4m line /�fC�a��G../V V V�G � l 7'l ! 40 L �. C.� t.//7 L.•• i.'L .(5! „� / , sy /P. Co.3tsry !.S Accepted fA► mt. , '�f� �;/ st a\'o -�\ N !e !P Abrae 07 Ate"l;!F-76 4ccePted fa-rrac/awm*ry ti � � -•.- - - . �35• b -��,r. •��\ ! /'/P. RCE 62d4 07 ,W9 46/75-76 Accepted for. ¢ Desert Star r1► / f` 30'R/iV for Strtef ,ouiPaose3 �'• Re 4e" 07 MQ 44175-76 013 So,o.is E os r C orINA . /nst 76'729 Rec.B-Pi-G1 r ._l o; s J' .� , . c�� K 3/s LP A'CE 6aM /.O MB44,17-4-76 Dy Owed of otdico t/w'7 . I o t o � p< (o, recorded FeD./O, /964 " � � ! , � �, gyp..•�9 � �\ L /"LP. RCE LZ84 O.d AIB4i/75-76 Aeetplyd fir 7rre/Cor-^er J,� h •� -/4'RIWfor Street purpa5es by / �: os /nst No• /699/ " " f• �� '� �,Ib (� M /-/P None /S Me4L/75-76 Aerepted for 7ract Cower • ! Oeed of Oedicatiar7 recorded ' E �' rt N /y""/.P RCE 6ZAV /2 MB46/7S 7G OA6 So,0 03 w o/'�' //rt j Feb. /O, l%4 as/r7,rt. No. !6 99/ I ` ! . - + qbb I l 1 ` _ /d -, O /Y P. RCE6Zd4 07 M846/7S•74 O./O jb,0.06 W&,p¢� do lert Atst Ab Jb719 Rst.dfli1G2 -� �qd 6 . o �6 , P / LP None 0.3 A/B46/73 76 AcCI fed fbr Erie Sl►. h Q �-- -- - - - - - --- - - - - - - -- -- ----- -- - - --- - { - -- - - - " - - ;33 0' z •. �' , y Q JYa iP AMC/Jd4t O rIIBSo/dA 89 •� P �,. z -T�d - a•3' Lof 5 y _ �� w -z . ,��//&Vz ZS A&A01 A�« vn :i i - ys9.ro a ad!•so � - /S � �. S / '/.P. RCESN76 Q3 A/BSD/dtd,�3 � � ~' � �• •-� x. s•/� y_ s l � � a0 O./O caoU.o..�dw. o/'.Tr. COrxr T '7(�-LP /// 7bM + Mg 3d o ai�•s�*'-�.. s9r.4o /r: 2 p� /3 �, /� e99 / 0.019 Sb. 0 56 w.or 7r rerxr e 2 �'_F - - -- - - . - �3 W10 o• ',S +I t U si(I:CP A'CE6Z44 0.5 MB4i/J'�76 O.2f So,O./¢ . /! / 3/ E. a/' 7t- [lamer p »is ��ss - »e -�eoi- �s.re ism `is�o- �s�r �1 • i \L i / Lo RCESZd4 Q7 MB46/7576 O.O* N. i o . es 2i 2' ZI t,`9J5 z M �N N r• Oj �`� °i + / Al f RCE62d4 07 MB46/75-76 •ice .._ I\ �3 •, ♦�• -, ♦j♦ Or �I: •a , '^ it d• ► �1`•. - ♦ O Oj O •. .,� O y ..`'o p" �� Z S v • cceopeed!be lee, ` o a ♦f� ♦�+ o I v+H o 0 0 0;. 0 . a ,�{ NOiIG I ♦(� o� v M, G =0� ' a X Z' Z" �PCE/Gr0�9 + ♦ 7' .� �� :'r �jh \`� a �h �`a �► of Z * / r �i([YO +PCE/d039 B4 /VO/!t �� ! ♦ ply v . f�\ , 1 /` A� �; �' M a0 1 �t� \ / I*r ►� ` /Xf'/P RCE/d039 •bt. Ot . `AUooe Y4"' A 'i7'/ ry,tJ J1 �' �' ..I/� ' ' S °f ' /v. �►.- a , ss a 1, t F s9•se is (E I I i j 7S.3.7s i �Re 1 .r' 1 10 'o �d0 I�* �3 ', Ae JIO h I ! I� �!% ss» Ifflr \ 1. -A l �' _ _ �- 565 c �s1 t `o \-ieQ 9o'R/w per veed reeardtd r� s` � � `. � � t r Nov. eZ,/96 5 os/nst Na./3226G ~" 'I �� N .11Go.fO !A•Is'It /!d /9 aD s3 r" &4Vp rae,0 /7td.M MD 74-JEG s + i 7 bf �- � - - -- -----"sass-1_.___.- - �---- --� -_ s . a. _ - tC '� � - t-:drd'.s�� id �• - S/ fOS.SO ??•/319" /S7t� 1l76S ` 11 - ;� ;.t'�C; l M SO S43Co /t•9v'45• //9.S,3 60.0/ AvE 44 i' r/ `1 - �j3 .9 /d a +��i i © i 49 /5/5.00 O'44'46' /9.73 9.d7 I y: ;r 22 rL• �� o Si J \'3_ 44 4Zs.50 qw/5'/7" 31.42 Fd[j mod' " .� 8 rah„".'s" t C•- C 4, f� 2YI Z/ - - . . .fe► .. •. .. " ► .. t: C ;+ ?417 3/S' Z9•.i4'46- a9 9.d t 6 /t s Cor. scc.fG :.; . 4 . .. v s • E '� 4v- , 1 /l po" 94 3 a r,. , _.>. ._,art, t>-.. a ,aIL ' x ..c.g R ,: ,'< .. a r f =i t} ,. � sir 2 36 � r�•,�4.4c- �7r L�= t Z5s S� /31I3: 6 ' ♦ :^s G ,a ,/ t'.„.�"►«..;�. o w G iC' s �'Z ' G+- �4 v►•'� �� */'/' `-1.° � � •` ,p'�-., rd 04 /776 /S / Z9'SO" 3Z.04 :Aw �, -i :. ,F•c< _ - _ 4 1 /ti c 4 - ✓ - ,� r_•J _ , �. > ,r _ , a3 sSo-00 SZ./Z t4.09 k .� 6.34.E.. _ - - �'.._ ,. .•�; a v.v �, 3d w �+ i- ,o"VA 42 SI3f.10 Z sS'09' P6.09 ? �3 0 . 41 543.00 9 S/'3G' 93 46.C4 .3a ;vv ' 40 4U.50 Z 4d'//' eO.d7 V44 a _ 7 i 1 a . v �{ .^ - 40 - - � ,^�� - •K .�- � �;. ��� ••z� � 3g 4z6.so ! tS•O6" S.td _ENG/MEEfS /NOTES h` ,r `r %s :�s Op t1 i 1 0 •� �� 3B 430.50 d 26'30• 6943 3/.77 / s. '. Z 'j , t�1_90 A : J4 �� :�, 37 JC4,SO 4•/9'/7' td.33 /t!y / BosiS of Bearl/7 s 4% the Lorr7de�t 6n�d mane r ��� `� '` u r �. a' " 9 ,- *► W ' 0 oo 3G !S/5.01�J I•S3"26 f2' / s4 70 Cannf f Rweiside. ~�' �� N 9.d O !t r / is fb o N !Q w f f Cam / E M 7 B j 3S /S/5.00 Z 3d S0' 7RGY/ 35.A0 Z. /nd/COfe's fodnd Monurl'7ent os nofPd. M -{ � !� �'� a s• ` Ns9•13'!T-M Y. o /ndicotes set .Nomamen! ver t y ado ( ' a. S� '� # lS/5,D0 l'�Sz'44" 7/.7/ .�Sd6 Palm Oes er/ Standard ,V1-/. y � •. ' z / v':$. o-ti 53 i 'tee % S� -33 /S/5.o0 3'av'44" 4m 0-9 ao.os a. Se/ z~X z" .Ardwoed Stoke, f/ush bf all .ebr Zcf -. i �t� ' ;,. '": SZ ,_ • $; 3? /5/s o0 o s4 of- r.�do /i 90 COrnerS ell7/eSS ©therwiSe noteq! t� .9 u S/ ��, '� =sstj ry ii. _ _ 9"' s ' 4' �s+e0 p O�,/y 3/ eM.s! 29•.VwI /046/ SW" ' S. Lead Plug Nai/ set /n Sidewalk of o// Lof p \ / y. �� �s9•sa s Se a- ;`r / 30 ?7500 el-Wi9" /t.66 Corners od,/ocer»` to S>`reetS. V. h �b!o , y, N.sy s sz42 71t3 i •►e9's�'sr. �7e 90 - / C 9r.re ssr za. - �� 7I./tMer /46s00 0 47.ro" zo24 /o./z GJ rti1s rract CUnto ;,73 S36B .oc,_e5, 6rdsS, h \ h 4 ` / gesso s•r�to' Y6:30 /dro '�� a 4 Z7 /0-MdO D'93'31' /0'6v 5.00 ;SO o"$ 49 h a . 7 �3 zd 47zoa / rd'tc+ /i s9 s.00 t5 9140.30 3 /0 9S 50.46 ZS Z4 s.� 24 /465.00 Z'/6 Q6" 60.00 8l.00 ` " si i�7oD sC s7__ ?s 9 S/ TRA 2 �2 �d0 zZ /¢Z s� 9•t4�- sr./t Z/.// a 8__1vt9•s� ,r0-` _LOT _ mac.rq _ --- - - - - s' -- `-- ,vl1r-AV pvr I. /N THE C!T Y OF PALM DES RT - "_ ZZO/ z 46.57 */ s6:oo zd/, E CALIFORNIACAL IFORNIA �„� az.00 d,.�o � r - f+ f93d 1 3.03*41' 7/S0 9S b , 2 ^ 0 74 /d /33d.?S Z S4"W 67, 79 3/� TRACT 8237 1 °0 43 " " A y QS6 `` Z/ i zD /7 /93d. rs �•3/ eo" eP z7 ` ¢ \; \ 4. . 0 0 ;o ZS ¢.OZ'S3" 9?Se, 47•SO !S /33d.ZS' t 32 B/ dZ.67 /4 /OZSdO s•!Z'2,3" 111.J2 55,,6J BE/NO A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF TIME - Q► ' i -- -- + - - �'' + i'v"•Si's/L.E ,7oi.SL I !- r f 13 IOZS.dO 4•SO'33' 86.70 43..37 • , 3a6-��e 3!9 s� uJ /Z /025.d0. 4 4d'4S' SOUTHWEST OUARTER OF SECTION /6, T.5S., R.6' . , 5.8.6 �FM. K /r + i i '? /o2seo 4••�6'S8` 8s6s .dzd4 PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL ENOINEERS MA Y, /977 fi.f ; /,b , /1�' + /4!� x //9 � /2� i /�./. . + � lozs.eo ��►s',P„ asla a�97 i 9 10ZS.80 4.43'?S d4.S7 42.3/ /~ • /OO 51-154 j9O-it/ !l//-Z,449e U/t/l T d 1405.90 4•rs 33- 7Y 2W ".c a 7 A/W- "OS' 7 9/0.30 6014f"e4e 99.4?7 /Jrr""5Z c wo•OS_!7%Y'RJ - 6 9/0..90 4•se,/o" 77 96 3d.7/ S .VI6'/d'JS"E 47dt S 9/0.30 4•SO'/O 76.C4 3d44 < .vo•os'/2"w d'97d 4 9/0-?0 4.49'/0' 74.3rI M../e 3 NSt•! '/!E 9.45 3. 9/O. 70 Q'46'!D" ?S.74 379/ t NSI.3S'//6 26.97 2 9/D.30 41044'/0- 7S,tS S744 . 6534. 3Z 70 Atari' 0) en lhr4J Radius! G�/fo(a> L >`fi!!,1 on L/NE o.4r.4 C61Rvz DATA - w �Z lit • �_._.. ,mod:•"' fi r I ... '�.. .:ate,—•.�:.�..+--•.-..,. ,.......,.. +.- -+,.•rr•3G.- - : ' yAlrIx ISO PCAUff n r t r. ( Y • �B ti - \ • , s �' ^^ 9 _. a ,•}+3y0 j i ���y -f �r a rm , ' a p . M,. y* L r r f � 1 r - � 'tea.... .. ...,...•w.•M��....�. .. 1 i IN r •/ 41 • 01 7 r r • a k w.Avl,%'saR.vTdk4iYWM1 �lt�e ,. ,rvn'nm'!• . d 2/ 'sue .-..e., >.:h'{. ._ ,... .. i... -, ». :✓ I � n w r p , MAGNESIA FALLS 1 — 0` o--� s 1�2 tG3 162 /I \ 5 3 , l y2 1C4 16{ 154 l 171 G I28 127 t PAP,< V 1 Z 6 O. IG 9 160 155 I I 12 9 S/rE — - - --- -- �4�Al �r:SER' COM�IUNJ✓ Pq.4h" 156 1c0 125 } 130 13! - --- - ---------- - <,P. IloB 1(0 ° 158 157 149 I' 7 1 102 103 104 142 143 144 145 144 147 148 122 NCY133 by 51 9 n� ` -6w OW 101 Io5 IZ ( 141 140 139 1 135 137 ` 13(v 135 h I' -u 106 134 120 P&AI DESERT 4''ID&L' SCHOOL Q IOO A- R 4 7) ly 99 1O7 Q �1NC.'L:'V �SCNOc.�C � 9a I 108 97 l09 I10 111 1I2 !13 f14 Ilq 116 I I17 lie) 119 Q 9�O way kw 0� 17 —_--- ----- --+---- f + -- '1 -- ---- Qj "'nary .064 _15 /tre =yc %0 � ` _ 95 94 j W eec 93 92 91 90 89 88 ` o �.ar�'yc' 4' ;s• %�� ^off? ;s 8 7 8� � 8y 84 I Xs v¢ _ ? RU rL ED 3 E 14 iN 13 - - -- — .�.. .a_,.», x.,�.., .a �..+Y,a. :. ,< -�,,.:x .._.. ... \ ....-y wa• � �'.s'12 .. 7 - 1 ?4 2 26 >, 1 Z 2 3 ( 5 � x 5 F /1 � � ( � �1 � � I k. i`. �i 75 tre 7w 77 78 79 80 20 74 i 31 30 29 28 I 27 I , -- - -- - 32 a\ 73 33 y DESERT .5NR BLVD •y .r-n' Ac a�i r - 34 2 7 35 �� ----- - --- A o 36 "'D t 37 co 3 �04 71 10 Otz'a -_,c li,,it/I/e5 G 40 I G2 �y 70 41 -- t 56 �� �7 o H O \ 4� A ,; 54 52 2 51 Q t, 5O 49 48 47 i . QQ - - raf•,oa r i - �, S7 IN 0 42 43 44 45 46 `� - - /7 /620 - VE L.A R DO DRI VE ' CORP, ApPrl( rA B7 DRAWN A N�, PRE"LACNARY SAL ES MAP FILE NO. UOI— 0004 PACIFIC RIBCHF!KFC iVPARK VIEW c _� ESA rC- • *� - ..":. SCALE TRAC T 823T� '" i� � *'., .� � �, ENVIR�G1Nt1v1E�`d .: L GONSULT,�INTS► LTD. - � T(Z,• ?Z'S t A►PRON(ED BY 1 ,r :' COMMUNITY PLANNERS-DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS PALM DESERT, CAL/FORMA "I 'm0 CATR : ev T DATE. �. ,.�v ...�. ,. .; . ,,; I r r � r f J { 1 I 1 1 Y _ � : L 7 fit• f r • I 1 � 7 • �1 RUY L.�r�GE WAY r/r 1 10 y "`. ,�" < r�^"r+r,�r j �,,,.,.„�-,,. . .- '"-:^ ,,ns .:,-^•r4 ..:� a'�t..*- -r -a ,max, w pia. ,,;x fi �« m AP CL _ T VRI-Al2D0 a . IN THE Cl T Y OF PA L M DESER T. CA L IFORN/A SHEET / OF 3 SHEET T-RACT 8237 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE RECORDERS CER T/F/CA TE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION /6, T.5S.1# Re 6E.0, S. Be B. a M. Filed this day 'or - PACIFICJ. PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS MAY, 1977 at M "' wok �` • at at the revuest of the Coivnty clerk. Fee w.0 Balogh, Cc�inty Recorder /73 LOTS 53.68 ACRES No. sy: Deputy subdn. 6'Teie OWNERS CERTIFICATE ENGINEERS CERT/F/CA TE CITY CLERKS CERTIFICATE We Hereby certify thot we are the owners of the /and /iaC/uded ivithji•� / hereby certify that /Dirt a Registered civil Engineer of the State oe /, Sheilo R. 6illigon, Acting city Clerk of sold City of oo/m Desert Me subdivision shown hereon; thot we are the gnly persons whose consent Co/ifornio and that this mop consistii�g of Three l'3)Sheets correct/y do hereby certify that this mop was presented to the Council of is necessary to Ross a c%or tit/e . sold /and; and that we consent to the represents o Survey mode under my supervisior� during "ay of/977; said City of Po/m Desert of o regular meeting thereof held on makii757 and recording of this Subdivision mop as shove17 within the colored tbal all rr onurnents shown hereon octuol/y exist one theIr ,00s/irons the day of /9 ,and that thereuAan Soid City Council border line; We hereby dedicate to Pub/%c use for street purposes Lots ;4" ore corr-ect'/y shown, or w1*11 be in place within one year from recovdolion did by on order duly Passed and entered, approve sold rnao, and thru 'O; sic/usive; We hereby dedicote to Pub/ic use for PLb/ic utility, of this reap. The monuments wi%/ be sufficient to enable the survey did accept, on behalf of the public, the fbregoing dedicotl sidewalk, and street tree purposes a five foot wide eoserr?ert designated to be retraced, the survey is true and complete as shown. Doted this day of , /9 11 AereOn os "S'vUE. "; A✓e hereby dedicate to Public use for Pub/iC Fork and // open 0 CO, purposes O'e /73. Dated-XLu /y 77 Registereo' Civil Engineer No. /d039 Sheila R. 6i//igar/ 4s o condition of dedication of Lot iN"(Deep Canyon Roods and xot N" City Clerk (Magnesia Fo//s Raad wn f �, the oers o Lots 82, d3, //9, /20 thru /Z8, /'S2, City of Po/m Desert /53, /62, /63, /72 and /73 abutting these /highways and a'urli?q Such time wi%/ hove no rights of access whatever as such except the gen.0r0/ easement of trowel. Any change in alignm&nt or width thot results in the vocation thereof sha// this condition of access rights os to the part vOCated. e/SUFE Seving S onod Loan AssoClation, A ColiforniaCorporat/on Senior lric re ideZLE CITY ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE TAX COLLECTORS CERTIFICATE Secretory �� hereby r if th t / have x is h/ her y ce t y o e orri ed t is mop and found/t to be /hereby certify that occord4i7g to the rtcords of this of{ice, substantially the Sonfe as it appeared On the tentative mop of Tract 9Z37 as of this date, there are no liens against the property shown as filed, amended and opprOyed by the City Council on r4 October i976, on the w.lhin rnop for wnpaiod State, C0Zjnty, Municipal or Loco/ '. the expiration date beings, 14 Actober /977; thot a// provisions of a,vP/icobyd toxel Oe specio/ assessments co/%fed os taxes, except taxes State/ow and City .Peg ofions ho ` Deen corr�,o/iPd with; and /ora� specio/ assessments collected as foxes now o /ien but notin otiSfied this MOP IS technical/y corrtec . yet payable, which ors esfi�noted to be ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Doted 19 Nunfer Cook State of La/ifornia 1 S.S Cit Engineer R.C.E. /Sobs Doted /9 . Cavnt'y of Los An9e/es J ! 9 County Tax Co/%tor On this Ldoy of , /9�, before me p• �r en) E By: 5 U M rAeds a Notary Pu /ic in and for said County and State, persona/ly ay.' Deputy appeared lie R f5re cr S• (k a 0 c oo•J known to me to be the Senior Dice President and Je a A11V e-T tt C- h o o�"S known to me to be the Secretary of els Life Savings and Loon 4ssociat/on, the Corporation that executed the within instrument and known to me to be the persons who executed the Iv/tA?ln Instrument on behalf of said Corporation, and ocknow/edged to me that such Corporation executed the within instrurrlent pursuant t0 it's bylaws or a Rego/&iron of /t S Board of OireCtOrS. Witness my hand and Off/cial Seal My Commission Expires o;F. s:-*L: Notary Pub/iG /n o40` for said Count srnd State D. GENE $IJ .0 4,� y r +' NOTARY P,,e<«pR�MC!fa; err SOILS REPORT TAX BOND CERTIFICATE f _`5► 'i .:f kh Cotes Ereiru �� � A pre/irr�inory So%/ Report was prepared by So%/,Geology, and Testing / hereby certify thol a bond /n the sure of has been Consu/fonts Inc. on the 171h day of donuary, /977 as reouireof by the executed and filed with the Board of Supervisors o f the County of w Subd/vision Mop Act. R%ver3/de, Co/ifornio, Conditioned eiaon the payment of o// t&;reS Engineer Charles N. Chrl- an _ Va0e, County, Municlpol, or corn/, and a// specio/ assessments - collected os taxes, pvh/ch of the time of filing of this rnop with the c'E. No. 22 33 0 County Recorder ore a lien ago/nsl said property but not yet R. payable and sold bond has been approved by sold Board of Supervisors . S/TE IPUTLEpG£Rl/E• Jo. Doted /9 Donald D• Sullivan • County Clerk ono, ex-of"Cio OESCRT STAR* ��' r Clerk of the Board of Sinner visors 9� a EASEMENT HOLDERS OF RECORD ey. Deputy 4 Q -- 44*6 14YE. 0 J Q V 4 v W 0 "IVY Ill nr rs_ VICINITY MAP PALM DESERT, f.4UF-OR1V/A 922L0 U0/ -0003 auto o IN THE Cl T Y OF PAL M DESERT, CAL IFORNIA SHEE T 2 OF 3 SHEE TS N TRACT r P-41- /t/ jr,z t5z ?7 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE OETA/L •• SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, T.56., R.6E•, S.81.B.Q M'• a/ Y¢�4° 4'7.4SQ°" ZB906 s3s4 Tye/jai O>rfsef PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS MAY, I977 East /nst. No. 78729 Rec. Q/21162 00 4Saoo /3"•43`►" /07.78 ./g /i7tPrsPcfion 1 79 4ZA00 A?*Zd'46" 3e7.-O* Z08.5/ 78 275.00 Z°3d 1/9" /Z.66 4-?3 O v•' � V J � \ /b „ - 7G/!f 771 45.00 2Z3•/7 ZZ" /76.9¢ -- I \ ��V G �315 z� \. 76 1 05..00 B2'STZd" 65/6 39.7d \ \ j� \ -A \ G_VV /7 �, Z Q 75 SZS 00 ?Z'3¢OS" ?06.79 /0¢,75 \ \ t t / J V' V s 35b1 'ta�U�'1 .f`j 7J 7¢ S2S.00 9 Sd%Z` 9/.36 QS.79 \ f \ '� 2�0 o'•` �:� •1��� �'� \�\'� "e-.4 e..'�7 4e erS J ,( ff /� 73 QS.00 ZTS'06 S0" /91.5/ S /"= /00• / \\ ✓ 7(0 � /� ©\ ,�( I�p 1] � �,,y .gb 51 � 1 � �� � 7Z Z7S00 33'00Q/" /Sd44 B/.¢9 Jt�i N o �1 �6 0 BLANKET PUE) p A / J�'JG.•� oll,k rn_ • '"� _L Of�G1'� !°� �� •Sv'sc'. �,.� !� 41 7/ 050.00 2°_ 3¢'OJ" Z//. O_ 5.60 fd�] \ K J I� `D fG/4 ,S •c ..a �ryP 70 ZS0.00 30•Z6'¢0 /.rZB4 6d03 :, - / "' / Pd' (R� fdOp Z /9 6d . `` i 14-4 /OZ5d0 /0.00 504 e� AVE b ` 407(fo Jf7'434 " 27dB 7645.00 0 / 98 67 9soo ZS'00'Zd' a/aK z/o7 f o•01G•zE"E / \ cRl- �, \ / 29 \ ��:- 9� z°,a rD _-- ti _ 4 �vo•o6 L5"E-vJ _ 70.9G roy 66 65.00 Z7•/7'<4" .70.97 /579 eo.Lo \ • \ 7d a-Ib .�( v /�` b' 9 4 -_�- - - - M .JV Q 'f 'SI" v b o S 67� 4 U 68 +� lJ ten- 5b �� �O ' _ "' o•os as- st711 a b 6S 346.a0 /d•3/'/6` !//. 9d S6.4d \ Z- 3 tv, /� �/ a _ ► q }. /S 21• •. o %16 /�. �Q 'd 99 - 66 /00.GY/ S0.3S 4� (�)I \ �� ,\ �lllN30� I wc= N/D•/I 5 0` N ry� p0' L -97 c, `p�\N / 63 6S.o0 4r0°OS'ZZ" 4'S.aB 23•TZ rvo•obis E �t K6.3Z 1 ' . 25 j� a� a\�l \�� �M1 / �y o `�a \� I�� , I .�i ZS' V /o<.2t 6 ./o GS- ✓ a` 2/ ` C �j .'1 / ! 3 W cn 62 95.00 S'/D'/7" D.Sd 4Z9 h e�T 1w o �\ / n �" 6 �'. ' ��/ /OZh � O ph s �1 p M : ,p R) v V - V O �F 6/ rps00 92 3Z AV 36.92 /B 97 S7 � � w' l 1,rr � J!/j - � � tee-' �V �i . •i ! .0 "+ `r1 0 �► O h n S8 a, �r 5,,� oy \ /e s 2��-Nr?. `�� Q ° s �� ►ru a�� h : I /l08 0 //09 /70 c /7/ o /7Z $ �� 60 3¢6.40 /Z'4'4 S9" 77.0 3d70 \ a ' upo •09' N o/l' - �� 4 4 q •o h h B b '\v �/a \'� / !/ 9 se " �,o / D ct tea. it e O Mr h. 26 N ago , C J �e'7 ^ /A6.l7 b ti h ti a S9 95.Gi7 /9•So'J/" 3Z.d9 16.6/ -- - 70�0` 1 .,., 4 b 2 /� c• ''o'"'zs /o _ _ s. ,� �j w � � •;1 C� �/ �"o �� ^ y A �^'r"��� ?s Bt a- ti 1V7 ' tei s� � 12 e � e � 4G r- ® v� b ^ y o1�. EO �o. w�Z•.o�, -- { S%uE 2 C SB 2'7S,DO /3'O/'Od" 4449 3/3d . - r f, 90.00 • �r,, •!Z No5obs'123z- ! y oo S NS4•pOO/E2 9.7/ /sz a9 ,raE, �p^p+ • 1i �-��'��� ��Q.�.•�� i a~ /O/ ��Ss ad /035J 27500 Z0.00 /0.20 24 3/ 95 S6 41500 Z9133'ZO` //gT 1,4-e .i \ e1oZ 0./0i �700.0.000 36772s0.6.z03o0 �t- 70.0o /3743 eo.sr wc+ + --- . r •: 0•06 zs E Q Sj`,vo uc is J /DIbO_ h .y v� �Ze �- 4� o �h 3 `a o SS QS.Q9 44 33 4d 3S 00 /d.44 2 d, 1�s``aa 21 � vo•alb't5-EJrJ ti C• 60 a. I �'1 O h /0i.97 h q I p ►s r�f b S4 46 3S 09" 36.59 /9 37 •.r•; �p (eJ VANL ,iti V`/!T. 7f - -L'J- 0 y0 �i r /0� �.� 4•yf a No•o h V h0 /�7 a ^ /tDY 1�• a� M A y 'M 6'1S-E �1 M O h 4500 a •; �, _n 3 LO�T�4,,1" / o J� 23 y 'F�i �,%s• ,�� �•"� 09 v IOS�. p q b �"+ M �o, • -- - \ 4®'', ^Cr Go.Qo O sv 75V V b g'%O- 8 .� to ` . ti, O V a ° /�7 b /66*V''• `a_ �Ih S9 ¢S.°IO 46 3509" _36.5_9 /937 .s nJ•• •'; 1/ �I �� \ I� Z� s E 94 ,L _eriP m �I" 1`1, ' ��` •' �sw S2 43.G� 3/•Za'28" 00.47 /2.65 I '••: :.r: 60 6� tea• sr`J?ra 6/ �`', �e 2 I�, 104 �•..• 1 NO.06'2S"E NO.06'ZS"E !h!( Q { l t I 4 I 1� �' /ZB.6D c-R3`o , ��\, 1 14 ZS I ZS' f O $ S �l 5/ aS.00 60'04'43' 47/9 26.OZ �''i ••.r•. �� h �V ¢ �lJ �'` h� O, o C •'�'h ^ N0• 3'c9. ,.� , l , �U h J ` ,� '© /G3 a.,. • v `� '� o b ol, o o I$ Z9 g g b si'r3" ✓ Z i �60.00• �, v o a cr 1 , �o.00 �E 97 -� 19 SO QS.00 4'4'33'Qd" 35.00 /d.44 a, %, h �ti h' n {y� _ _ _ ••••' �o/ �' �, 62 � Nh63 O w q= in ti T �� /O9 No•ob'73'E /69.s6 h w r . Y ' \J - -- 49 4S,0o 77.39'23" 60.9-9 36.eZ ! \ �' N. 4S9 SO0.00 - /d°S4D6" /64.95 8723 ;•..•. z'. - bb \ " �I'•' I • � 93 LJ' `3 l.v0'ob'IS'E 30720ti--- t ti _ - a _vg•o6 2s 8s3.e4 73 o.00 a -- --- 1, I ,✓0.06'IS C I2B/a ZS !q � ' '�`� I hh II OOD I f - ---a L/�`V�, Y� NO.Ob'2S'ECtJ i• •• q C0 47 450.00 6'38'OB" SZ./Z ZL.09 i s 2 �d I ta•nG Z5 E 24 - -- /sQ6o z• /l7¢ j ao•oa s E z./�o - '+ Noaoa'tsF /3rso LOr NO•O6'23.E I3'�S"f.(R) /^-- - -- - - -\ 2 /--- - r� li' 46 9500 /6'SO 06" 27.9/ "+-• II o a �'/ ioe 6o /ae so ba oo 70.00 / � v • - -- /4.06 c. No•oc Zs-E 1� s9t.3S c ZB w S e o o� l) 1 4s 4'soo 37 3Zsa• t9.49 /s3o ';•.. "� Z �, j� 9Z 8,"� //O. �`' I \i or 1 Qa 45.00 aS'8a34' 35.66 /s83 ''' : v M M /te.bo lee.6o �, e^ ;. 5�°- i " g I Y/ Z o o h � � � 9 :, .. ,> . , .,,.: - � •.••• _ - / O I :� " o• - h ql"� �..w..".a•' �""1"�'� t` �y� `�' A � s ± y O b 0 w '1•�:� , • _ �(D V LC 4 D! N NO 06 25 E N o6 z5 E ( s '" !3 'o•06't EIlI� - /•� r . ,.:w 43 bS00 29<9as 23.Q3 //•99 1.. - ., M.. '! ti _ r :1 w v v ,: 5r' e.3 .: - -- -- s. . �.� r0ih �� O r c ti; •- -_-- 2S' zs' ;d \ `b IF M 7�r �' ip �� \ `•, 4Z a 5.00 GG'33 4d'" 3S.CYJ !dt 4<4 h a Iq .7�• h{s. �'t" q M g !, o w /Pe 60z-_ /2.9 60 ti = / / J9: M >? D $ I o I� �r 07 , No•06-Z5`E .zeoo i ---- --- v " //00 ---- - ----- -- - -------. •� I 2 O 71 •G' �: 1 NO•O6•ZJ.E o O'i IS E NO.Ob'ZS""E a •. i e m• " M e ' N •_- S / 4/ C5.00 7S¢6 36' 7-502 ;� 2 ?S h I o "�" 1: 40 a5.00 75'07%4" 5900 3460 G 7 /7 - 51 !z ��' i1 J ?S�'P5 \ ��GTA/L :4" �� J w In 9f cf "+ /// d, O /¢Q o /¢3 e o o •I r-SovE '$ h +--- (o i r �OC.co .vd.co ^1 h \ �3O00 - 7000 _ 7S.zo 2 /3SbS e -- -- 399 45.00 Z7'Qd'Z3" 2/.B¢ 1114 / 2 _ �LAiO¢a¢---S$S_..-.00-_0-DO- 443r6b 7'•GS_oY!s/4/9C"'' _36 /¢- /9.// \ N � ' ND 016e.'6Z S0"E 'its �^ � w0•O6'7S�'E0 n /7537 4500 90.00 73 z _ /ei 3dZT 203d Q3 47 M lI/�¢dPAL M L Ao � O D 3702 /963 36d.7o a 0 _ 144 . /SA 7 . 0 70.00 Z Z32?Z3 /Z<Z � / � ' N--o-•-c-�-'-z-s"- w(R> h N i ---- - •�i �1�� i /z Y�mll y� /ZS 60 /Z/.i0 `0 e \'• . \ �►� 34 ¢S.00 Q¢ 3348' 35.00 /B¢¢ I' v �trl I3 n No•o6'ZS'E No•06'ZS"E h IZO60 /?460 2 ( q • r +3 33 ¢_SOD_ 44 3¢v4' ?S.% /d 45 q a `r" ± h Z b ti Q M q No•os"zs -� vo•ob'ts'E 1� \�ti .' ' �' h � w' O= V;!'� +�t h n q h 7S o� V O o h � d I � i � � 153 S1VCn� --45.00 ¢d'ZS z/" 3so3 Z023 t• : ' '�� a�' b M a ° `' ^ ° ° $ ° o M baQo 70.00� :J a WI 0 p q �o O 1br�' .� q q' 7/ h 72 �'� 7.3 e M 7Y �I n I n �J9 ° M ��J 0 M l0 / �- - - 53 / 30 45.04 77 33 1!S 60.9/ 36.t5 qI• tilh h , n A �, O•ob'tS E ;� /fzsb Fd C 3/ a5.00 Offeiv0o _ 3S3¢ /d.64 �'+\�( T �� � 'rih0'' 69 �h /9�12�4h hlq \ h � /oL23 �p, : ► w, S� r.� M ti /3 /YS � �i _,.v �i h *- - ►u i h• \ 01 a e 14 N h i2I60 /2s60 I: -5/riE TS _ N_O'r06'lS E_ -- _tS32pt y 7j �t�r , •y b e NO.06'2S•E ih 4 e r -'- B�L.SAA - L •' "+ ? ty'�5` M ` O NO.06"ZS'E NO'O6'ZS"E , 'y0 06'Zs"e 3 va 0.6 nv E Z9 95.00 /6.19¢6" -- Z70d /3.63 ��a' v .rf v£ o 'a O� 2 c, 2S E /9190 e ti 19b W.so 70.00 70.00 e0 4 . 2 0� O o p o •, � ) (.o.oo -70.00 4 j •28 95.00 /6'/3:39" 26.9/ - /3.54 7G M q e o j C o 0 jp �' 2 '-- - •O" 3J r9 E e .�r�rj _ ss A•a ZT36"w1R - $ ,, 0 88 0 //4 a /37 * z7 /5/5.00 O'4Q 46" /9.73 9.87 G N47 /6'ZTi✓/k b , ?5' !R O N 146 t9 +'• s� 5 N46 G/'3¢E(RI ?S" ZS' \ h J ►` • ° +� 3 (92� 1 .(� c ?6 2ZS.00 17•¢0'54" 6_9.4¢ 35.00 r Z6 Nd9.53'93"+✓ ?.43 -- - ltb.u 53 A/46.29'4'4�K'(R) -' NO.O6' Z5"E /00.60 /0460 -�/ /te 60 Z /?d60 = b {{, `;'' ZS SZS.00 /0/9,99" /2./6 4.Od 25 N/Z°09'Z6 E /O.O/ SZ V47°/4_43 EtP -� / N0.06'ts- 2/7to 2 No•o6 Zs`E -' o•ob'Zs•E ��' 2 h -- h h z �, 24 S2S.00 7'AO'3S' 70,3< 3SZz z4 ,vo•ore'2s"E /ZS9 $/ A/73"39S6;ir'/ - ; 77 ;'I _-- -C3AZA/ViA�_9oZro_PLA _2e ?_' �$ o; $; z `� zd _szsoo d'2o"a9 76.4d 3d 3/ LOr G" /31, /¢7 $ _ Z3 NO'OL 25 E 6/.So 0 0 ^ �3. w v v ZZ 525.00 S•13103" "Al P3.9Z n NO 06'ZS"E 6Z5Z ¢9 jN70 0374�✓�l \ t6.01 O �-N /Z 6os E i s60 -� J �^ /?S60 ^' /2d60 ^ e q I~90.°0 7O • ' • J226.15 ! 29'So" 320f /6.02 Z/ NO 06 ZS"E ?,SL 40 N32 09 30 w'LP, I ; o� / M 75.20 91/7 g¢ * 3 9'S oS /6.0 /9 Ho,ob'PS E 2.90 46 NJZ 2B_/B'M'(RI - h q 78 �' °� 1O o �, o ` °' •-- /o7s� 'ogB7 bo.00 y ¢¢ IO M � NO•of'25'E NO.06'LS'E 1` ZO SZS.00 5 02'07' _46.J4 Il.08 ZO N53 OS Z2"E ZS45 47 .v/O°/O 34 E(R) � O o 3 ° O ti \ 25-c 3i6.37 ¢ cn /9 525.00 •I 3` 37 3 . -- , - h ^ 7 o 9 7 O //Jr �! $ 135' /49 a A a al I� o o h o o c ILA /d ¢5.00 19'Sd az" /5.69 7.9.9 /d ,vo•06lef E Z.Z9 45 N/S°/3 Z2 w/P) ►� I M � b v -_- _ ° - /Z5.77 23' /3260 /2d.b0 I 0 4 b O ° ° 44_ Ne7 06 ZO E/Pl h v Z /Zo." /Zebo ° 6 ► ti cV /7 _4S.A0 S//O'3?" ¢O./9 Z/.SS / NO 06'ZS E /.SO - --- No•O6'Zs"E q ND•06'tS' N°•06'2s"E q - 43 NeB 611•?9'w/P - {; a 3 f O �, ae IQ. I 2 4/ 1 r/o �28 ti /b 45.00 S/ Z4'// 40.37 Z/.66 A-*SZ'9-, !!'6 Z6,37 - - - - ---- h 2 0 I ,vooa Zs"E zs7zo /o7.S0 o /6 4Z Nd5•Z/'ZaE/Pl - '" 79 '' l0 8� ° o //�. �f til i '� } i �''h+ No•ob zs•E a ' /5 4500 4'9.46 q6" 39.09 ?O.97 0 /S .Vo-A6 'ZS"E .3S.9d - - - - ° ° " I 4/ N42°27'/O E(P) - r: n I V ^ t°. h n h N I, ^ b o �_ 77 _ /4 r1S.00 SD'/BOZ" 39.51 2/./3 /Q A'66°°O'S7�tt/ 45.4d 40 V7B'/7_02"I✓(RJ wo•ob'ts E 3 vo•od'rs-E I �h / �l •F° h hi as w r U _. i^ . ---- /ZS.SZ �2 i3Z.66 /2e.60 ± m !�Y' y, ( e; e ti N v /3 4.5.00 Z129%6" /766 d9s /3 N66 o0'S7"W _ f0.00 a _. - N o /33 /32 v y2 ^ Il,M°`� u!Z S6'ss" `� q 'J'9 NS 5-1VZ':W4e) _.�Q•o�'tJ_�Lr1 "+(/� =�d'4•_o!•_rs"Eyt1-- No•°6'ZS" \ h QI• �3/ •IA' lF `r `� /2 93,00 3Z•33?S" S3.9d Z7.74 - lfi q �' 2S' t�-' �s ¢ ti\ ----- - -- - .VO 06'Z3"E- - /79/ 3d N3S 07".4?"W 297fG C h /2�00 0 OI e '^ ) �` �� e ° p �/Z 9 ° 66,J6 eaOel bb.l6 `/ •?�• O V QT7.00 /O.34'/O" d7.99 44./Z N // NSS 3_t B7'k/ 33.05 3T N•3.3 07 S/'E ?3.BS v�` Q .t,-BS C //7 ,�1� -- - -- L --J baba q -ss O a 3 ---- -- - - - - ---- w ' Z h'n Ao I �'J -- �- R�i� /O 47700 7•/Z'26" 60.01� 30.04 /0 NS3.4 153'E(� /d6/ 36 N3Z°S_S'o!"h/ Z3d5 w \��'n/ �' ` �'y� * �o•o6'zs'E Zr/to - ! NO•o� PS E , � JM V 9 477A0 7°/Z'ZS" 60.00 90.04 • ' - /e3.94 /tQbO2S' N ,Vo•ob'IS:e �0720 i 9 N89 S3'3s"w 9.G6 3S N66 00'S7'h/ S5.¢d 4 111.610 - -- Na.oi'rsE Asa l.� • - d - -e -- -- �.-' N0*06'ZS" �NO.O6'zS"E SILL.K TREE nor � :��- LANE �r'f ° d 477.00 7 PSOB" 6/.76 3o.9Z .Vd9'S3'3S"W 9.53 Nd9_S3'3SJt/ /S.6¢ w NO.O6'ZS E r �'��, "' .va•o 2s"E E" g69.3S � `v 'oo}so. � �; n 7 346.40 8¢S Id" S2.9S 26.53 Z 7 N4.05'32"x/ •17.33 39 NO'04'//_E _34.02 //� 7r-e6 J J 6 34'6.4'O 9 05'ow, 59.03 e9.Sd 6 N45 06 ZS EY,V 33.91 32 NS_2' 3.5"!!"E -s 66 b V/ � J; e � o S 475.00 747'46" 64.63 37.37 5 NS2°33'2'e A/ 3/.d0 3J NSJ'otb'2I"t+/ - ?S.OS \ �$� ( I� 00. - --- -- R1 �' /6 :r NO.O6'ZS-` h M`n p n b O +n� , �„� a4 \ 4 475,00 9.43'ad" 80.94 4057 ¢ Nc2•a4's<"E !T./0 30 Nas°37'37 e zd.o3 k o. ^+ { 4 M '►'h o �+ T q,�� "ram �? u 1 3 475.00 B 4S'2d" 72.60 36.37 �� � �� 1 y�` M �r h • h h �^ b • /Zd p C • -N - • - --- ---- 4 b r_ O �� O /G'O tiI /�/ ri,"� /ZZ +i+� �'� M /G •+^t'?r 1� "1 3 N / oY'f/_E /8.98 29 NB9 S3'36"A/ 7.2/ 1 ,7" 0 M D (q N M ti n,h Jla h b h r �Mj o h 'e ti / � �� ♦h \1• \• �I\ • �U \ • r /G�,ti�•1 ° Z Z75.DO /3.06'IZ" 62.99 3/.Sd Z A/aa°S3'3S",v Zd,Zd ZB N/'3s"4B"IV 26.97 0 8Z 0, 1I V3 .� O //9 v �° h o ��, 0 / Q/0.0�0 S'/S"00" .97.57 le ea / iv<S•06'25"E 28.Zd 27 N44'OZ'S7'W 16.3Z � � a � - Rod/us rR� o�ito�a I t� th(L� To ei7f(T !0'0D 147.75 /ss.bo Joao /00.60 co.00 7z.eb 72e6r 7r.eb `I �uzecb ;M s,s7 7s av r- �9 n9 BQarin (d� Le fh(L) Be0!-ir� lBJ Ltngffn/G! a No•o6 Zs" 4//.9s � �'J NO•ob'rs-s- CvJwE oAr4 L/NE OAT,! L/NE o,4r,4 m 4or " m ;� a b 14 <sZZ 16► a ISi tf• !9.70 . /Oi 94 S y Cl- Sec./6 _ 93 9,Z 0 n ---- ��- _ 'S 0 9. 67 _ - /!o/. 7514 Sec./6 ' - --" DEEP CANYON ROAD voi 0003 1K82.3Z 'Yo'G!i'25"E Tota/ B.¢Q CoEastLlne SW/ Seca/6 - AUG 0 3 19?t ` A4 Cm- c4te./d. SHEE T 3 OF 3 SHEE TS k//1 Ne9•f2l3SVE_ 2656.or �fd© e v* ser. /Co. ma�yy, ti� i j MVN, 40 ❑ OESc. TA6 DEPrV REF. OTMER 07/ I d',+'� 30'R/W for Street purposes by s N o y- , y Oeed recorded .4u9 /9, /936 ;• / 4 / 4 /.P. Co.9urv. /s Cor /.3 A�1B 77/92 NW Cor., S`V¢ Sec 16/,NB 99167) �Z ir/ Book 29d doge 19, �a / B *5 Reabor RCE/8039 O.Sup None Center Sec./6. /n MrkMa4d I r A C 414"/P None 0.5 MB45/49 SW Cor. /i Sec 14, 7 mon. well 0.. 3/4-1,0 Nor?e e..0 Co. ries SE Cor., 5WY4 Sec/6 PA + „/ E R.R S,oike None MB af7 Accepted for F /% /. RCE e.084 - 0.05 Wof/ink (� / '" f? f '� / .,�� J \ G 14 /.R Co.sur✓. /.5 Accepted for j/nt. L !/'t�C.�Ci,�/� �j' 'C �. /�r/ / -'°�•• #- t, C.�f �:'��L �. �C .,�4{ 6\\a o'J ��\ N 1.4"/p. Norte+ 0.7 MB 46/75-76 Accepted for Trott gozma(ary i35 z6 �,� �� •Ps\\ / /'/.P- RCE 62d4 0..7 ,NB 44175-74 Accepted fbr ¢ 0e3ert Star //fsf 78729 ReC. B--Z/-GZ IZ 30'R/W for street puiPoses �,s� ` s -L J -TO"/.P. RCE 62d¢ 0.7 MB46/75-74 0/3 So.,0a6E Of 1i C or Q I ♦ to 6y Oeed o,� Dedicatioi7 f' S �� '••� r 0 / , 30 /P5 �7 ` A, 3/a /P RCE6eW /.O M646,/75-76 Iv recorded Feb./O, /964 g¢ z Ig. �- L /"!P RCE 6Zg4 O.d MB414175-76 Accepted Aer Troet 6orner O O -•-1 I / Acre fedfor7'roet cbrner pup by I. OS /nsr`. No. /699/ ,- �� � $. �4a („r � A4 /"/.P. None /.5 MB 46 7S"76 ,� -/4'R/W for Street rases • \ C, �g t`� = O a° , p • I Deed of OediCafia'7 recorded `! G 5�d �. r�5 �t N 1/"/.P. RCE 6Z84 /.Z MB46/75-76 0.06 So,0.03 w of t /nt. /O, 1964 as/nsf No. /699/ �R ,_ v 6` 58 r J A, •+w Z �al / (�1 0 /�"/P RCE62d4 0.7 �fB46/75-76 O./o �Sti,0.08 wok .go. line *St- A&Ae729 �a ss96�� g /"LP None 0.3 MB46/75 76 A c c epfed fbr ¢�Erin St. hQ o ,---- - - - - --- - - - - - - -RUT --------- ---- - ---- I -- --- -- _ ,q�•oo' •A' '�.�� - / � Q s/a'%P. RCE//B42 /.O ,�/BSO/gB B9 •' " " " o a I LEDGE T jd:9 a•37 ill 5 w _ ` o Q �Q .,.. $w �■ R /"/P. RC,-- 11940 Z5 jV950/88-89 Arc gjed �l NI9•S/'I9-N 759.so I R=dd3.3o 0 .- �j • 7,3 °o% 2�5 0�6 0 0 1 ��_ / S /y"/.P. RCESt976 0.3up MBSOM949 O./O c9,, o.38 w.. W Tr. Corner 4� q _ N ¢? 1�1 ; _ / r ?/4"J.P. //legible MB 38/5z o.09 �. O.5G W.o/' Tr Cornier 0 v I w {�.- - as9•si s9"w I s9rso _ _ - t_ o• 3 w J c �¢ o /1 5? 4& � �� �' � / � U -+/¢/p R!'-E6204 0.5 MB46/7S 76 0.21 So,0.3/ E. Of Tr C?xner. 7745 7766 77d6 7ao7 70.Z8 7549 7e.7o 7e.yr , Z • q :• �' �. 07 ,c/B 46 75-76 0.04 N. 4s' i s�rrE ° 2 9e5 / a .,� 13 t.40 \N ' 12 0 �`- O p o O O O•` O. p\ O N N �Z o 4 beg. • \ w \ ' / X 2"XZ" RCE/80397 MB46/75-76 l{ccePfed for ¢� //if. V o t 4N ♦- O OH 0 v 4 � •� 4 � oA OA Oyu • �� H� / G � �� � ,� NcnG 4 h Z 0 3 4 / o h Q a o \ / �. 3 !P RCE/g039 0.4 ♦'4 �� S �h 6 � h � � M � � � ✓ =b IO $a a � � \� Y � � � Y /a" JVone o v -. * A ` ZO None �L jj Q J(/ �/ /0 //"/P. RCE/c9039 e '`• •�/c� 1. i �3� f f P ,trl 9 '�° 35°Ob fl /\ �0 sao n n46__�f_ 77ss 7sdf 7so7 td 7/.I! 70 yd!! 1(7.53.7.9 I I i 7S3.7d MB 46175-76) i u Fd N❑ �'A I 1 I / S. 2O M W� h I I I I , 29 A �� . `0 90 O `o i Ad. 30'VW,oer Geed recorded rs O V so- �0 d �, ? tt ` Nov. ZZ, /965 os Ins/` No.13ZZ66 _ A : 33'0s fo 0S gp �3 , J� N Sz 360.60 10,46,04" //g/9 5R,43 1`� SERT TAR XI' 7ldsi 1729-49Aff :t6 75- -m a � � �� (��-s6t /d �,- �= \\ S/ 405.S- 22°/3P9" /r7.Z9 79.65 / Q74 \ z ° 543.00 /2'36'45" 119.53 60.0/ -- a 9•s3'ss"E - ls4ss- ------ - v >m A�=/�st•'S ;P `/ i l-' a. .�.� V t r \ s\13 9.9 Z !d 3 14 A . ` 49 1515.00 O'44'46" 19.73 V 1 Z g s �to �' -� ., 40 rfZ6.50 q°/,3'17- 3/.4Z A.7Z AaE 44 a 0 r- 1 L - x dy`S4'Zd"E .1"7.37 fd.X❑ •i 'I ^ i `•� x /d 5' , i'�` 47 405.50 4'/,3'/7" Z9.ed 14.94 0 I ,; �Fd.❑0 g ` � 3S 3 ��• r .9S 44 Cor,&C 16 = ,7 °41 1 t `-' �. t O 4'6 23/.S/ 29 34'46" //9.5Z 6/./Z s �l SWCd cSac./6 a' -0 I. • �ia� Iw-v �d 3 4S Z56.5/ Z9 3446" /3Z.03 67.7Z F 4 • "s<n _ +� . ,, ipt . w 44 /ZZ6./S / Z9'SO" 32. 4 /6.OZ <. oof "'�'. !.. "i. z. x .y d 9 _ .-u. a.� ,. ,q y L �7 3 7 • a.,v:u :� " _-„- i,. ..:.,fin:"iq� .'# - 3.. "+ s :, .: ' ., .,.: ,..: aC C. i .,, . .,. �1� . . t3 •ems st ; 43 4SO.00 6 30'Od' S2./2 26.09 * (J v 4 4Z 543.00 2.4509" 26.09 13.04 =a'Y Sox 9°S/'36' 93-44 46.d4 29 Z3 ` ' �7•sd.yl G. S 1, o i i l 40 426.50 e*4re /" e097 /0.44 �� w -ems ¢� O p' r''K yl' =�� 6 � 39 426.50 / ZS'O6" /O.Sb 5.28 �iyG/INFERS NOTES _`,�' � �° R.i¢ D•� p=�� /? H \� o� 0 \ 38 ¢30.50 8 Z6'30' 63.43 3/.77 nzl f �� R:l4g PEE �p �\ \ (� 37 3d4.50 ¢0/3'/7" 28.33 /4./7 /. Bosis of Bearings is the Lombeif Griq�, tone 6, >,�.1 36 /S/5.00 4653,Z6 le9.3/ 6a 70 • s�N J ¢ •�sj5 59,32 35 /S/5.00 Z°38'50" 70.G47 35.00 County Of.Pivciside. �'Pabrto/a is N O //"E�MB /G7l o�, ?S i f s j - �,/ R z a• s y xd9.53'3S-w 2. • Ind/cafes four7d Monu�7Pr,/ os noted. �� e S¢ 34 /515.00 2'¢z'a4" 71.71 35.d6 3. O 1/7adicales set ,Noname/7t y ems,, Z a 4 o- o , per Cif Of N 3 Palm 9es erl StOndard A4-/, -. y a' / L`J~o o 53 d ruF y S9 33 /5/5.00 3'0/'¢4" 90.09 40.05 4. Set ZXZ" ,&d 061d Stoke, f/USh, ofO// rear Lot \ / rgi r s`''`� 3! �N SZ * 4,6, 0 32 /5/5.00 O°S4'O/" 23.80 //.90 Corners Unless otherwise no/ee;! �L� S� ". A d.93 + Z /ui�ECrwtc34 3/ ZA6.5! 27.34'46" /06.6/ S4SZ a.,. Z5 7/.56 ed - - - - - - -�i-fC5 M.0 � BF e"9 5. Lead Plug 6`Nail set //7 Sidewalk v/ oll Got \ / y ��,�, E a 7/0 79j23 nd9•S4'sA' `TSB-oa 30 275.00 Z130'19" A?6(° 6.33 ° 54, Vt9"s*5� G78.90' GO/nerS (20, n1 to Scree/s, h \/� \ °❑_rs ^'e�9IZB g9gZ 29 /465.00 O'47"30"" Zo.Z¢ Z- 2drue= 79./9 MB ) 6. 7"hi;5 Tract COnfoi/7,5 53.G8 acres, 6rO35. \ \ O �, ��4 3 ��,s 50/�_851 28 385.60 5'24'ZO" 96.90 /QZO \ aJ. / -• ?'a q �I ti ti a \ e / 27 1OZ5.80 O'33'3/" /0.00 5.00 ,y b i n �f AD •7 ' '^ a `^ '� 1 26 477.00 /'ZG`Z6" //.99 6.00 \ � f r, 3LGq � SO 0 � 49 h� YCJ �' e ¢/ : ti ; Z G3 o i ti Z5 9/0.30 3`/0'35" 50.46 ZS.24 n S'PG�E , 24 1465,00 Z'16'06" 60.00 Z9.00 6970 ee-S7 _ _-- - 23 14(,5.00 2'54.0-9 74.Z/ 37,10 ! h r xe9•si 4Q aP - 4 oe 256.51 9'Z4'29" 42.1Z Z/. a� a vd9-s� oe_E LOT Oi rvc.zo a Fes 'T�t .�i 2�r4� per_-14 j�e ' �O� / O / , 4d ,ve9•si d..E yo6. .'i - oo�r►e eta/ .'�,Q 2/ 256.5/ /Z°30 3/" 56.00 Zr9. IN THE CI T Y OF PAL M DESERT CAL IFORNIA i f - ,` w,8 dz.00 a?/.30 d%SO ZO ZS6.S/ 7 99'46" 3¢3/ Q` -- T- - W s9 - 'Ame a 1�� /9 /338.ZS 3'03'4/' 7/.SD 3S.74 r p y y, '� k ^ O I le 1338.25 Z S¢_'09" 67: 79 -73.90 4"T, RACT 8237 / �i ti M o h ti O a �:h '7 ?/ tr 17 1338. Z5 3'3/'ZO" 8Z.27 41../5 4Z o 43 44 4.S 46 * o Z/ 0-� 4r ` ti c �'c �o o �o e c /6 /338. 25 4'02'S3" 94.S!o 47-70 , 1 4f I ti 2 z i 15 1338.Z. 303Z 1/" 8Z.67 41.34 {� 14 /025.80 6 /Z'23" W. /Z 55.61 CBE/NG A SUBDI V/SION OF A PORTION OF ME °SQ's�E �06.�6 "°� - - -- -- -- - l3 ,OZs.BO 4•50'33" g6.70 43.37 SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION /6, T.5S., R.6E., S.B.B. &M. � _ � � i i ���.�MBi�/� �J F�o // 00 80 �46 38" - 8s:63 ¢zs4 PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL ENOINEERS MAY 1977 /' /�' 117i ff 11�` I / o I /`�'f '� a /o loZsgo 4.45',Z" gs/o 4797 9 1025.BO 4'43'25" a9457 42.3/ SCALE • I„ = IOO I 8 1405.d0 ¢'25:33" 79.Z4 39.64 • J�,4 PO at/ 1///-G,a 66" UNIT 9 7 N12°.36'05 WAR - 7 9/O.30 6114,00' 99.Z3 rf9.66 /f713 3 l,57-- '��' 6 �v0.6s5 47_AIM - 6 910.30 4°SZ'/O" 77.96 38.7/ 5 NZ6•/d'3S"E 478Z 5 910.30 0150,10' 76.d4. Se44 4 _.vo_•06'/Z"w ag7d 4 9/0..30 4°48'10" 76.30 39./B 3 _Ns?•3S' 11 E_ -9 45 3 9ro,3o 010%1/10 75 M Y791 Z NSI°3S'//E 26.37 2 910.30 4'¢4'/0" 75.Z5 -77.64' 9/0-70 4'06'51" 65,36 32.70 BPorinq(0) engfh/!,! Rodiusl De/ta(a> to >'hlU on erdtr L/NE o.4r,4 C(//PVZ DATA vo/-coo3 • AUG 0 s . Lfi C ✓4co Ex. If% lbl _ nth -,4 FA[Cg AP �fb-/m�/VVe � - lea eca� �v�ds �af� - -� Nr/heo i Comer of the &vlbwest fv , ,� h I _--- - - - __ .• +�. Srbvyn , R.6 t. S d d$,K •_�y e — — - _ _:' C�o�e/ Ttrrrar dia, cr�f/etsjed{er/Oyrr Jlarrn Section i6, T 5S. �4 ` ! j ( ; ✓�' from h Ifs 0 adpm' try)m/ a4 177 i 7� /1AP �TEJ rl - - , / D �S i►��Ycr USG lf� .S imv and 4wn o d Zof + CAB 9009 2. Aea 4,vv emt. 34 >9Ic. 1 l&5 lots. ¢ AZO DESERT COMM(IN/TY PgRK v 7� `� of �� h >r K 1 I / i�of - CIrCi d/ POC fob 57� 1i/ tl /oo /no Senior CVG S n/farrwn y� _ize,6 - � � WD o y S f - j b $ r( l¢J� P e ?a/✓ee /o �rI e/ on l D,5#,c/ by Orel, 4 SEhmI - sef �nds Uie�. �lJlX Orstircl`. mawaed 44aye ll Z0, /96? as t f /0efrume�f Alp. 78729 T" 7 Pro sf reef pvdeS 0,��7- A//,?, 1 �' ST 8.& a trO5 dedeb� ed wiA smg/e rrs/d�xet: ° 9, Pr s d-*&A r Pe 6. St* vf, /0,/a a ut►n•/0// verh o/cvr6s CP ie Aitd driveav o f, no$ldeal0 ' ! ID. Forrr�rly known as Traf P44T �r rrr�lly r.r �44f I 1F' l� j o 24 - ly /70.0 13¢ ;�% 144 i �f o/way for a/W1 purposes I need retarded 'A"/ /y,/9X 'A -r is&k 29?, ?33 oR ^ I �0 r\� tso' 7G- - i---_�-:��_ _ 70 80 /. ----14 , h1 Pacts &-sE,gT MIDDLE SCHoo[ — i r 9 of wo t5r street purposes by peed di Dedlca/io17 IrMMed (!/nder �nJf/ _^ __ _ _ __ _._-- ___._�� • Febrdory /0,46Q ds /nst. Arlo /699/. / el 57. LINCOL Al SCHOOL / { 1 ` t ra z <. ' ?o ¢ ill i r y /�7 z _ T 3o'ry�/i/or way f6r ilmel purposes { by Oeex!of Oedlcol/On reladed f ' ,%U/b line or parcel CWtlfyed lo_ � February !0� /964 os /ef/No./699/ � • 70 /" I o. ' �� I `` i 70 Bp K' /ndio School 491strtcl by Deed I 1.lw dea .4&ya6/ pa,/96P os / / ? kshumenf No JB7?91a /�0 /�� ; &171 EDGE Ay4r, 3¢ ; � / i � ► 1 \ 'P PSe S � if ot! , �'� 2 •� 3. fir'��, v :•� ?t': � `i .' y;.. --"r_ - , \\\\ a >/ i ""'4 ,' ",`v-^t,.- sn_ Y. i.:.',k _ ,� x. >,r`w N -_, 1 6 nCCO�PCId EO /t � � t }+ ,..: �, . _ -..,,. „' ;yr ,,.G• ,3. c �...r," ty+ -+ � ef,� � .<: t.._�.`�'t-" �' Y.S. ,4 t .[_ •� i. r rm le L �• � : go QOl t I ty� ( — I -Exisfin4 Alru i Gt1llie3 '' _ ern_ 47/' fjo p orre: er eed aroms7 *c, f?,�65 44 '?;' � I j Nes16 A�•,•rn lines DESERT STAR b4VD. Q ni \ �5 ,%n5lr�rr.Bn1 No. J3J.jF 4. 1 yy �f i" r ,. r 44 pcbNc,rwd�'utrlrfiPs _ e �0 ll !2 I IZB.L ( 128G-- '----- 6y Ge.'m;or, o/ Peal cofian a ; ` �I �coroe,' '-"y /i ;fKJ - , _ a + --- s a , _ �r ' r~ - / J•ice �1� V i ! - O `1 Y 70 �, �° y V ba s (f,'�" \• `= ' i t At,s� Cate Wes' 0/dg7► in 10'E45t mJ� (d' a H �'so• / .OJ ( Z5 ' j r ( `Bpi 7 + V/CW/T Y 114 �� � :'_• Jr (6c,3 17.1 �f�G'rCi✓) �� W exle .ST. �IJr7dergrdpns ufil§ s,! vVla s� 57 Ir / ,f �- _ -, ._ . . •-!-'Ex/� �f'erb/•Uri/ �" ` 4 — � 1 _ i iu Qc ',1\! I lr' !y � :li •• � ` � ._ i •'i i e I ILr I ! • � —.. . - �.• p' /7 16 `~ ;;,% I I � — VEL.ARDD DRIVEz CORP. APPROVAL BY: F PoGn Dirt B �3R G r... ', � � :y.•, oR, N FILE NO? 74 . 1�5� �,F ��5j1� T� Al L* TAT/�E ' P T.PACT ,87P PARIM ` 1efi I M #a T �/ p CNK.KEC 8Y OAlf Palm � 9?t6 � E 1976 REC-iSTFQFD CiVil EN,!NEER v sCAIE s 7 or Rl. w /6, TES-/P6 "�, . . B , _---�-_ __-- ------____-- -- 'I ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 3 -6/�5 .. AiPROviD V NO R�EV1�101VB DATE BY DATEe °" ¢ f COMMUNITY PLANNERS-DEVELO�'MENT ENGINEE�2 _ lDL'I" &.5e {,L'J�11, n x r:: ro ;'_ '^,x :^' ;:.r v 7* ;`:. v :;= r,a'; s":•.,'..,xe x+ k:, g •w.a x,•q :ja'fi;'S+ .. r 775Q-77,1 n q 6 R S .�"•..'.'�:: ,>-'-':vs+._.. ,. •r N` �' ,. �. s+;.A.:Sk t ..fit , ' , - I sp� p, xt ., .:- + l- •.,r .„ . Ai^'SR...'?.':AI�C_. ".�+ � f�' •� liy lr�Y C ✓40174) -. .. � E'X. 4rtk/biFa k 93 _ Ca»er a fhe &vlhwestLa grnfsr fi y /ytAG�lEglq FALLS ,Pp. /fi��v� d- L �� -/C,'u CA9� Tvnd 1lt�r -- zy — w0 S I of Suhnn 16 T 5S. , R.6 t, S e..d 0H Harm - trim rr V7 orr adyAccrrl t1� i""` �� � C�i afP.D 361 !7 , i IMP 41L L 47/ l r/St ►�rscr; USL lFE anc/ rn I , -17v 5gfo LUIIs IN Blvd f Las +�elet a/ 96m 1- 1 i� ►. � l�0 �_ � _ � Z. �iE�i dpProx 54 �; , i85 /ot5. 44, 1 : I I f 3, 001eYxt. JilCo%fc� , Tele 6veml 7, if Co ' P LM DESERT COMMUNITY PARK l 7Q No 160 Q � �, ._�� " �tlo •b4� - .gyp. Co1>f, 445 Co , , cvc rvv PoCsp 6s�t�� j /28.6 _Jaen ! /2g'e MB'c _� J2B6 ioo /00 5errt CI�GWD:' Sonrfory Ser�nf. 4,; J , b - to i q n • + ! EOs/ 11ne o/ X,,eef con✓eye0''v /gore Scban/ OrsJrrcf by Oted . -- --- � ' �rf ��Js UrxftP .� Dr�fi cf' recorded Au gusf 20, /y62 os �� ; _ �' _ 7 Prof sf mf 9mdes - /,7s/rumeaf ko. 78729 i D A.XdJ aeel,,f fte5 deyeb WIA slnrp'le rr dr*W, it i�• STa , . 9• s�1 � �,� . st�s �a� gas/a� �Jfh -, i I vt � curbs ��it�t�t?n)f v �a 25 j Id: Forl?rdy km w# of T A47 lrimv4y per Ti Y447 24144 .t',-yk o/Croy lor aJreel�rpases / f � i �� Deed recsrded 4Lqu51 19,/y3b 60 70 80 1 � rh cook 292, QR t : ------- 4f ' j y , e . I s /4' &Al DESERT MIDDLE SCHOOL I---t i------- ri�bl o f woy r�• fr eef avrposes 6y DBeli a llcdc Und« �,_^--- f af�o� r�coro`ed � ----� Febidary /0,IYU ds /nst A4. 1091 ��t� 5T LINCOL N J WOL , : 30 ! I *Jo!wq k, afrel purposes ,. I by Geed o/ Dea't olion twwdtd — i %V/h /ine of porce/ cwveyed /o Ftbrxry 10) lYe4 oS /ss/h'd./699/. �/ xa i 7p 70 B0 hdro School 9,slrlcl b Deed ! /nstr anent Ao. 787?9 i , ReJ 74 EDCTE AVM f = a .. 34-741 ry r .io.Pi hl of w for :r . ., -. T:. :.'`- „ ' '•� 1erJ my,,ld ,4pr//3,tRf4 o I � 910 u 'I h7e, No 454 \ N a 7 74 I - I _ _ 44' x ! • -'tx/Si r>7� r.sr:4• t,y;r�;BS I , ' ;,.• ,' ` \\ / ' �/ � / J(, - � 7Q — ��v,---1 �p �� �C • �, G� s/F Alr vne s CD ES ER T STA R B L.VD. .a' o - t/Q 100, 10 r n y �, lot -L,rt �I� llll/YIPS _ b \ l q c'' ; Dedication, per , G I — lrp - o' ( Ii i,,, ;o i520 Q s q- x r` Jai t t' O''- xt 7 70 lie- As 44 in — ` X, aVICIVIT Y A4 t��,� ., r '--7 T 'Curb —••-�- -- -- _� _ s,��rt exe, fglAl 57 1 �/Jflderg4ad vbl§ Ser'y/of) ! ,fV,Lh Secflon 76 /7 /6 20 2/ _l- -- ------s— - — — -- - I VE L A RDO OR!VE CORP APPRC'vAL BY oR,eIHA r. Alk7 � _rI FILE NO. 74 L9ri4�P Y y DRAWN � A" TWUPIlic IMP 71• Tp4CT 8�37 E9l Av tra! IFIC RIM �O//� gmB K.KED: 8 r A'E RE ISTE ED CIv:: EN,! .FE r '- s-c LE_ .!=�Q� CI /x I////O1 I• a /1. //// `(� /�' /T/"I)✓S ��L�i.`� ✓L] +(R/R I(/ if /-L �� ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. A PR r DATE: COMMUNITY PLANNERS-DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS pQlm" Oe51� i- N ND qVis90 DATE 6Y PROI NG° •.►� . - s+ ✓OCprt� •�,<- ,.,_ __ - -- 3S1 r' Y W ,r s. x Y wr.,s' * c.,:y nn •,: £ ;, Y 4 k -_ 1VOl/n�OSl Cd/nEI nt fhe cOJfhW(lat '�.7lf?r ^'; h �W � �� ,,� �� . ,,, ._. ♦ � °' ..# drop �-'t-T�rn nary ,mac c�►/¢s 'Q. /rorn7 l 23 �t10 8 d 7 On odvofff 7ml/w q1 ollz 177 fPD , -A,4? &OTLIC5 , 'i 7c, 5270 4U113h/1* Q/Yd --- - -- - - --) 6 9 LOS + /Qf iw gxg LD6SER . tb T �� ' ;Apnv�bx. - —� �� �l �► K C014 m U/v r)oo /lot• .So. aftf, i*s . PALM DEMR7 COMMUNITY PARK 17O ° 160 a 11 ` -- gl�t1a- - CvC1D ,e OO�SD �16S dui/y� -------- ar-6 /?A49 /Zg.G 111Lr - CVG��.� 541J/ 4ry .St E'/f. $et�+r t k l onirt �g 29 fos/ /ine of xree/con✓eyed/o -- - - - - r�`A �•' ' m, ago ; 1.�/?� Use t�Ol7/ .S/rl f/n!f!� /7t�4 n✓p ?t1 � - - - 5cho�/s l�fei7` finds Una{i /stoic :� t � i4o�a Stbon/ DIs/r,cf 4 Deed - . ._ �` ,t .. :'� �� �;� � recorded 4agurl 20, ;?o as �, „ - propow ff rrrt 9mdes D. 5� /,f/�, I oftm �a,rumen :., .� 4 ., , _,� .. ., , ,, "' '. .».: ♦ .. ,f'x 8.Ad 4cerl! f GEYL i�f/ � l'f �. 1a �•< . ,. < > .,. . p.. , � ., ., � _ . _ ,�.� N n��.a� . .., ".�,... l4Cf ,� I J/n'lC lS1G/B ,, :�&A �j Fly. 6, .Sf� /��' /�J,/Qf0 w1/ICI r 4 1 9 protostd rttral cv 6s �wql E'nrd, drwewrxv o �, r✓� �srde�ai i -- i ID. Formed' kVW17 Of TXf,W7. 1a T4 r T1 2 1' I - 24 gal 25 � � � � ► � � � !x , } 1 ' I ' 154 144 .z I 4 i "ri f of wo �� a/reel r ascs _ -- by Deed recorded 41ol 1,,19A C� � 1 ^a i `� In dank 292, ,� 233 4R ^ 60 1_ 1 _ _- 70 ZLAWAT i t_ . 133 g5 I , t` r — + t+--14 r� bl Pq[M DESERT MIDDLE SCHOOL o _ of way 1br sfreef ur se5 6 Oeed o dedcaf/oa rMMd5i �r f >` / f Febrc or 0 /96 as nsl` ltlo /699/. � , s , 44 IA1SCM004 ,, 4 Q � n AWOL N &HOOC r 30 _ 3o' r6/o/way fr abre/'purposes � _ by G?eO of Dedico/Ion rrc�dtd —_ �•'� / o 70 ,`ixr//1 ✓ine of orce/ cc»✓e ed /o Fcbrcbr /0, /964 oS /o.0 No-/699 I P Y —, , y I /adio School 01slocl by Deed {~ ! f corded Auyua/ P0,/96P os / / 4 /osfra,w l k 7BiT9 er I i I I > 44 o t . , a 3 � i - _ . ., .. N ( SKI j LIT 41, r , rx h n. i , RyM of Ibr s're'. A�! Os - , i v ,x q•' / I 97 74 8o 7s3._ P� ! — --- ., ., n i a;.s, , t )4 _ ; , • t , , * t 7 � y o , l/esl Alin uae5 - 44 DESERT STAR BL.VD. - - - - - - s� 3✓ rr« 'par& ov 9ee_ol'lvcorov 4/ay Fs 165 t , '!S S r✓,renf c \ N `3C. -`" `��W,.,-xn�*,t a'�.�,,.:w,g•"2 s ..` i.. - r . t {`.. F „ rvv y r c _ 1 + \ � aD I :P ra �!trllfie5 _ h # P �7 6 4 GEGC^J� nrr.�IfOr CJ./On s:.:�•c$ ' � , o. ol K r R. ; _ o ,. 40 D I t i war,! i A b \ } ` h -ww [Q , .gym :, f x �� WOVITY A�I , � AP 0&13k,79 t fRJN T � S - � Q 57 fo 20 ?l VELARDO DRIVE i f t CORP. APPROVAL BY OR'.GINA*.tNG FILE N0. 74- l9f X �O,rn ��f✓'f LI / • /A� P TPe// //%� DRAWN B Y ♦ :. /II AID, TerVT,47*111.z' 11 1 / I •e) , V T to �7 RACMIC pgfL/J CNi-CKED BY ♦.c I - � , /• T .5. f B E , SCALE us IOD� L•1• s • t' • r kE,:;TF�Fc c+v,: �N:� tiFEa �c ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 6 �•' LPPROYED BY r. c•. /' - - COMMUNITY PLANNERS-DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS Rolm deuer"t k,!!1® ' R>EVl IlClVB t?ATE ®Y DATE: PRO1. MAR , � Ca F, _ _ OR_ . IN THE Cl T Y OF PA L M DESER T. CA L I FORNIA SHEET I OF 3 SHEET TRACT 8237 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE RECORDERS CERTIFICATE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION /6, T.5S., R. 6E., S. B. B. a M. F/led this day o! , /9 , at .M. in Book of of page PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS MAY, 1977 , of the request of the County Clerk. Fee wD. Bo/ogh, Ccnnty Recorder 173 LOTS 5.3.SB ACRES No ey- Deputy subdn. 6'rer OWNERS CERTIFICATE ENGINEERS CERTIFI CA TE CITY CLERKS CERTIFICATE We hereby certify that we are the Owners of the /and /iac/uded within / hereby certify that 1,:,m a Registered civil Er79ineer of the State of I, Sheila R. 6illigon, .4ctin9Csty Clerk afsoid city of Ro/m Desert the subdivision Shown hereon; that we ore the only persons whose consent Co/ifornia and that this mop consistii?g of three l3)Sheets correct;/y do hereby certify that this mop was presented to the Council of Is necessary to pass o c%ar tit/e to said /and; and that we consent to the tevresents a survey made under my supervision during "ay of' /9'77; said C/ty of Palm Desert at o regu/or rr�eetirg thereof held on mokii�y, anal recording o!this Subdivision rnop as shown! within the co%red that a// monuments shown hereon actually exist and their positrons the day of ,/9 , and shot thereupon said City Council orde hereby dedicate to Pub/;c use for street purposes Lots :4 are Correctly shown, or wi%l be /rn p/ace within one year from recordot;on did by an order duly possed and entered, approve sold moo, and b r line; We hereb of th/s rr/oa. The monuments w1/1 be sufficient to enable the survey did accept, of the on behalf o the public, the forego/hq dedicotionS ru ii7c/ We eb hereby dedicote to Public use for Pub/lc ut;//ty, sidewalk, and street tree purposes a five foot wide eoserrent des/gnoted to be retraced• the survey is true and comp/etc as shown. Doted this day of , /9 11ereOn os "5"PuE. "; we hereby dedicate to Pub/47 use for Public 447rk and open space purposes Lot /73, Dated a / Revlstered C;v;l Engineer No. /0039 Shei/a R. 611/1*9an .4s a condition of deal/cation of Got ;�t"(Deep Canyon Road) and Lot;v C/t Clerk (Mognes/o Fa//S Rood), the owners of LOt5 82, e3, 119, /eO thru lee, /5Z, City of Palm Desert /53, /62, 143, 17Z and 173 abut//ng these 17/917way5 and o'ur/179 such time will have no r/ght's of access whatever as such except the genera/ easement of travel. Any change in o//* &nf or $Vldlh that results /n the vacation thereof shall term/nape this cond/t/on of access rights os to the ,aa�t vacated. !/SUFE Savings and Loom Assoc/at/on, .4 Ca//fOrn%a corporal/on Sensor Ir/C re ide CITY ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE TAX COLLECTORS CERTIFICATE Secretary / hereby certify that / hove exam/hed this map and found it to be / hereby certify that according to the records of this oft"/ce, Substontio//y the 50,-ne os it appeared on the tentative mop of Tract BZ37 as of this date, there are no /ions against the property shown as f;/ed, amended and approved by the C/ty Counc// on r¢ October 1976, on the within n7op {or urpo/bd State, county, Municipal or Local =` `the ex irotior� dotes be,n /s Gic%ben 1977; that a// rov/sions ofopp/icob/e loxes or sOrcio/ assessments c0//eCted as foxes, excep/ taxes a g ,a Stole /ow and C11y .Fe9✓/at10n5 hove been c01"pl6r0(-w/th; 4rvd /arsa ..:r ,,.. .,tom -- ar sOeciio/ assessments collected os taxes now o lien but not - Sat;Sfied this mop is technico//y correc/ • yet poyob/e, which ore esti�noted fo be ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS lifornia Doted /9_. Hunter Cook State of Ca Doted /9 of Los An e/es � S.S. City Engineer R.C.E. /"068 County 9 County Tax Colleclor On tti;s - doy, of L , /9-11, before me p G C^) E fy Deputy S iJ N► rA e d s a Notary Ru //c ;rn and for said County and State, persona//y appeared 14 e R C3e 9f I• (k o CS6.oo..l known to me to be the senior !l/ce Rres/dent anal 1 C N1v a T ff C• h c n"4 5 known to me to be the Secretary of US Life Sav/ngs and Loon Association, the Corporation that execated the with/n /nstrument and known to me to be the persons who executed /fie within instrument on behalf of said Corporation, and acknowledged to me that such Corporation executed the w/th/n /nstrument pursuant to /t"s bylaws or a Resolution of /t S Boord of Directors. witness my bona' and OtficA7/Sea/ My Cornmisa/on Cxpl-es P'r P L 3 , I g 11 - 0, c: ;-a.. Notary Pub/ic ;n and for sold ., � - . County end stab 0'�F.y o SOILS REPORT TAX BOND CERTIFICATE ,4 4*sri�'1 4':. C. a� �� �j i Vfe"Ni.tpi . 4 preld"inary Soil Report was prepared by So//,6001.09y, and rest/ng / hereby certify thot a bond in the sum of has been th t;..nwrsiosT'arr .t i9 t y Consu/fonts Inc. on the /71h day of donuary, /977 as reouired by the executed and filed with the Board of Supervisors of the Gounly of Subd/vision Mop .4cl. Riverside, Co/;fornio, cond;t/oned upon the payment of o// taxes, State, county, Municlpo/, or Locol, and a// spec/ol assessments Engineer Charles y. Ch��>>ten collected as taxes, which at the t/me of filing of this reap w/th the 2 2 33 0_ County Recorder are a //en ogoins t sold property but nol yet R.f.E. Na _ _ payable and said bond has been approved by sold Board of Supervisors . S/TE Doted /9 Donald O. Sullivan CPU�L EDGE q✓E J o. Coun-Ay Clerk and eX-off/c io OEsc er srgx�` Clerk oe' the Board of Supervisors •V T EASEMENT HOLDERS OF RECORD y oepu y Q 4 None: --- 44 tb qVE. o Q � VJ � Q h V V v 0 W W 0 V/C/NITY MAP PALM C/o/ -0003 DEs£RT, G•AL/roRN/q 922Lo AUG 0 3 19" /N THE C/T Y OF PAL M DESERT, CAL✓FORN/A SHEET 2 O 0 F 3 SHEETS N TRACT 8237 a0 - \ �! N �`i L.. lvi� (f t(r„ t�� ! t..•4.•-!Yl lY.�:.jf`! % %'r, , -� i41.'.� ; ,•�3 •.� ^�✓V/4 cnr .sec/6 \ - BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORT/ON OF THE SOUTHWEST OVA RTER OF SECT/ON /6, T•5S., R.6E., S.B° B.a M• ;I 8/ 3a6.ao �7•ad Qo" Zd9.06 /sj s¢ N�S°rfse� PACIFIC RIM ENV/RONIIIIENTA L ENGINEERS MAY, 1977 1 Ea Llne Inst. No. 78729 Rec. Q/2/�62 80 45000 /3*•/3e�4" /07.78 51./5 79 42-%00 SC'Z1?'46" 387.•!l• 208.5/ N �'' '.;a 78 275OO Z°3d%9" /Z.66 1a33 � O ` •- � /� g0 � \� 77 45.60 ZZ.5':7'ZZ" /7L.9¢ - ^'T \ \ '� 69 �3i5 i� . 'q 2 ( 1 76 0SOO _82 S7'Zd" 6516 R9,7d \ ,.t•j� / /7 'yN Z \� 7S 5ZS.00 ?Z'.3¢O5" ?06.79 /O¢75 \ r t ,/ / C(� 74 SZS.OD 9'Sd%Z" 9/36 05.79 \ iG! / \ J rr 2 9 ►;� i�I 1 �'4i i r; �/ 73Aj -- ° _ \ \ , \ j 5 z� n i•. (1b aQ' �' V� `� AREA e..S7 4cC67S h O f!f 73 _ 4S.o0 r�s oc' /sd.4¢- -- eia9 sCole ; /.._ /00• / 3 �h �� \ �� GdOai• �(� IE �\N'?/ ��V• 5 .V ) ov �; (BLANKET PUE) 3 n M` 7Z _275.00 33'00 4/" 7/ 250.0 0 Z°3Q'O/1' //ZD - 5.60 \ \�' 3 •i I �p � , \Q��'� '�19�1 °��'y y/ q9��-,�i'T�''��?z' �' °{ 70 ZSO.Ob 30°Z6'40 /3Z.e¢ 6e.03 " / \ / f+,,,,,,JJ (Id fd N z `� /9 a• m °Q/ •11 � ►s: o �M_ _ _ [�"� r'llJ (9 /OZ560 - -O'33'3/" /0.00 5.00 55 / / �\ \\ / \\ `dO.fjl l0 2/ \, �� ��_ �s �\ \ ' `m. .F/ .OL ti';�s o a:��moo.`�r� Zp7 .. �I v \ 5 / 4' e A �/E 6d 65.00 //Z'430d" /Z7d8 97,6d Ih \ O \ �g� 112' ?r. j �\ l�� 9i 1 o� q ��Ifi' vo•06'ZS- \ _ / �� l4' 9 6J T_ E 407JJ s.. / 67 95.00 ZS'Oo'Zd" 4/.46 2/.07 I VO'ob'2S"E / \`/ / (Rl' 0 ems= o �� m `� 7¢ a �Y _ 98 ►, \ c •�a�yr�sz t\ 00.20 • ` �• ) - ! , o \97,pt•T •� ly - _ _- % NO'OG'LS'E 66 6S,00 Z7•/7 ad' -70,97 /S.79 o N \ \ d 1 w lQ Z °� �,� �o- J \39 5 �� • � .- - a3soo _ I - c�, SG \ \ 7d Z' !'S�30 Nb� /35 7. !� ' �� h• _ N vo•ob zs'E L- 6S 3¢6.40 /d,3/'/6" ///. 9d _ S6.¢d - - G d ¢$ b l ti 66 746.a0 16'3Z'ZS" /OO.00 So.3s a \ 99 hh . z h _ y, j\ tt d I wro �./�'� SpJ� o o / h�� p�. L 97 �l� ; /� 1 /�j f-5e./r- -7000- 7u.00- 70Jo- 63 GSOo 40°OS'22" ¢5.4d 23,72 3 vo'aK'rs'E r�•�'](1/66.32 \ �i F / ?•� a�, o _ N' / 1'• 1 l mod, N�a \b�pti /OO I vYJ Ni n' u' �} V 62 9S 00 /06 ZZ 6 ./o t J G a Z/ <v` cy 4 0 s 0 i S°/O'/7" d.Se 4Z.9 y �,.�� ) e. o ' /00 h °� O j h 3b 3 n 6/ 6SGb 9P 3Z Z¢" 36.9Z /d 97 * 59 "+ '^ Y 4.+� 0.0 (R) .� P7 >o a .� "; ,� OI^ h M o h ^hi S 4 /l S•� /� r✓ 2 `� s• w e 1o, n o M °I a M �; v - 8 - o 58 "'E \o a �� s� ti z° o 96 , Z ti �; ti /68 �� /69 ° h/70 /7/ �, /7Z/Z s¢S9_" 7764 3d.70 ♦ a o. ,p9' e//' 4 10 a Ei'I `� 01 0 c "� '+u 1� 17 N9 O. j..o / o'•(T F ,. �. ' 97 hS7 N a n' �d I F--- 59 9SCp /9•So'//" 3Zd9 - /6.6/ 6 Q 79 oy b{ 70y� ^, \_ ® A� 2? ? vo•ob'2s"E \ 0 q q I - 3/ wm� �G 6 \moo. /07 2S/ - - - - SB 275.00 /3_O/'Od_ 6449 3/.Jd V �z. o \ �•os- 2 _ i ?S� 55,22 °�� dE O -����� q. i � s�L9•i� ` \�.! s'`•' i7is.! bl I 0 � 57 27S.o0 4 /S'OZ" Zo.40 /O.ZO S " P No•/9 S a9 ` Ei �\ o l �� , �� r \\'• til /� /O3 �a I 1 • 2 3/ i _ M0 b r� v, Z dim72. 70 00 70.00 70.00 ec.SZ - -- --- - O BO.00 7000 1 751� jlvj a Sb 4500 29 33'ZO 2sZ/ //d7 S /29.7/ - "f _ {\ - -- ---- - 7 --- r•y O 90.00 73 2�•�'ory'+'NO,/Ac'ZJ"E oti b �1"�s/dl6o 71 t3 _ v4Noe06'?5"ELeI ¢ \ah y ��4° ,zg60 Cl Z J AI O w ��� `n /06.97 �I h�MI 362.63Ct - 4 3 010 44.33 Qd" --3Soo /d44 ^ '•/ ,: -� �vo•o �S..E' LOT `V NO/i VIR�f - - - 0 Z3 _ ^+�l`' a 7j,4j4 �_c say •h a'� ��, NO.Ob'ZS"E M A v Sh /6S a v a6,3S"09 96.59 /937 a ti° 32 L / 0 30 y 03 tip c`rP e✓i . % N� of `� ►� v�' �-., '3�: o %.� S3 ¢Sa17 46.3509" 36.59 /937 ' GO.00 .vim. 5� 9A -g'io- �I m\ �► MI of e I O / p Cc ; I E/- .V P/ m 1 , . •� I p /��/ SZ ¢S.G1'I 3/'Za'ZB" Z¢67 /2.65 I ..,�" ° "•: �t �0 3j ,/2 /IB6d /?So7`- -= ti o 0 SPvE 6 .�� �`.\ �� �a 2 vW 104 r 2 \, h\ ,� � �5- L ¢� �' •�� I NO.06"ZS"E VO.06'25"E 0 26 sz i 25 ZS a i`1 =� ,�s� S/ _45.00_ 60'04'43' 4719 _26.OZ ,'' '' r••• %tt 1 1° 3� " •�' I p I p C ti' / 0 33 4 I I o VI ,� 63 i ' h / q y 50 aS.oO 44'33'4d" 3S.00 /d.44 �' u h r;• 'ab o QI o b si"r3-E 6s d` ✓ , >�.00 lL; Ih h a, v• v� N al h $ Z9 8 k Z4 z¢ ti ��/ _ _1t6.97 -� z �o.00 _ 7o_oa 49 45.00 77°39'23' 60.99 -- ?6.Z2 . °1� (p/ O ����� tiy�e3 p N 2 ti' ^ ^ ti saE Q 3 /Q9 67. No•ob'ZS'E %69.36 / ii0. - - 4d SO0,00 /d°S4 ob~ /6a 9S ' ' %\. k� \;q ` •/IB.6o °/ 93 ' S 63 / /_NJ'o�'2S"E -- 307ZOry _ t. 0 06_ZS E N ZS324 �1� n a _ _ 89 23 �' 2 I N R z - Z5 ZS' I /3 7a�`F"'� ti B�T�N i�!DOD� j �• - a DRIVE j 47 450.00 6'38.00" SZ./Z Z6.09 =. I t/f�� Q I •✓O O6'ZS'E _ /rB.60 - - - - 46 9S 00 /6 SO O6" 07 9/ /4 06 ;�•• G E+ No•oG rs E z9Z. s IQ O y ^ �- - --- -- - - -- z9 a9 /sso 3 o- - - - Z NO vb'rs E , 90 oT --- ••f ^ 7SS0' G200 ~•o In f' Z / 60.00 70.0:^ , i \��• •G•...\y� 53 ao•Pb'.s Z„ _ V _ � � iaB 60 � /oe.do u' ?s' / /QS 45.00 37'3Z sQ' o N� //O• yJ!R� \ ( /9 i��✓ �e� �' o �(O J - - -- - - - ¢4 4soo as°za��- 3s66 /ed3 _ m v h o h " 9Z as M r ; - - - 4 . • w •1 I h q. > M, /2e60 12 /Ze60 3 ^ . L $ /4/ $ 4 t, , � 4500 29• GS•, W - '� r yl t 00+ �I M No•06,05-'E vo•o6 zs E - - , ... "; ,S, # IDe M• _..,./ o �„ ,43 49 23a3 //.99 \ �6 0 �o o " I I /2e$5 _ - - - - ;a ,. �'y r - - - - - - h O > - - - tS .2S i , (�► " rveee6' S �l! Imo. ' Mr •� �1 4Z a5.00 a4.334d 3S.GYl /Q44 V �\ e 0 ;,\ N {00 C ,� di,` NO•O6'ZS`E /Z8.60 /ZC60 --- --/2860 �, e y h° �G^hi h 9r\a J -- - - --- - �4i 4500 75 Q6 ' S9S/ 35.02 hl h �. 2 j 1L� h g 2 I �, po v $i i No•oG zs`E N 06 zs"E /�7 r 0 �,•� /�/ ` ? e7 e6 NO Ob'2S"E o• q L - - -- - - - - ?� - -- 9/ /// GC a500 73 07 i4" 39op - 3460 �' ° 6 7 `' /Z �'; i1 tS ^GL�Ti4/L ;q�. 1 h �va.co ~ I�1 n 1� O p' /¢3 o von ry rSpuE 2 {� 39 45.00 07 GJ'Z3" 2/d4 ///¢ L 7 / \ s3 -�.o0 n l\ -i Z /4O 1 a _ � ' ^ n O BO.00 70.00 ' .v0.06 es"e 0i'2 D /Zd 60 /1s.60 ^ p --- l a.r �,l 39 4.5.00 a6'O/'/4' 36./¢- /9.// I -- -- ' '' 23 / < `� ^ /ZB 6 �t No•ob'25 S /H j 95 Na•o6'2S`E .m7zo ^' � zs No•o6'z5" ; NO.Ob'tS"E � /P8.6o � -- - ---- 75 SZ vo'or.rs /e/e4 -- - --- -- - ^ 1 No•07. ZS" NO.06'ZS E P 37 - a500 4e<9'47'" _3dZ7 _00.38 � n/o•o6 rs � ;` � , � � -- °I o h o - ,0 36 _45.00 47.0d'/d " 3702 /9.6 3 r C\ `s is s r - ,r°° LOT i/~ ` ^ 9O o °n 0 4 10 /39 O o / s ouE o M h h / +.. PAL MI LA h ° _ W 35 00 �'S/'/9' 24 - -- /I. V�R�iLE o ^I //Z b, �i o O o h o `D� ��� 3'N/� ��., /SY 5 �� t �1 vo'o7'�5' /rK' _ Q NO. 2s"E 36B.7o o O O S)'YAE I^ n'o p g M h M v a °' ' /d as ' '/ �+� ' � �":� g I3 1 1\ -v0 O6 IS"E 3 No•OG ZS'E �1 /2560 „ /Zd60 ^ ^ 2 a �� ,o ^ 3¢ r5&W -. 4a'33 ad' / -/d �� q 7 M.w `,�O� I N h M^Ih $h 75 v 0 „ q vo•oc rs E No•o6'rs•E I �03' Q! 33 4500 44'.9a a4 __3S O/ /Q 45 i I t 4 a � e .• �e �sz^ � s0 y �� SbVCni SecJ6 � _ 4S.o0 48 05 2� 3d.03 Oe23 /• /YI �F ala p :; h a m ° w ^i`^ 7¢ �+• 3' o ° ; ° o O /9 ��zr y /.5,3 L% vJ-° -- - - 7/ a, 72 73 e,h ^ 89 //3 /38 /4S - - = -°+� Fa( C ---- �,�' q , �,a• h q h M ^ o ° M O N 0 o boon 70.00 3/ GS.DD 'Os'(Woo" 35.34 /d.6¢ ' V 4j 7Oii, i 4 °�41 (ui. q h'` ^ •n p O' / NO`Ob'ZS E • /3Z.5b 5n3 / a --_ - - - I al/�--{ k i�• hZ'h0,' 69 _ 2,��1 �+e \ q \, /OL23 P h �I' I 1 V `�v �l 30 45.00 77 33 2S 60.9/ 36./S 1, y e N /rt6o /ts60 h /zeGO /2860 "�Y j) E 1T _ f�.. M - --- -- -- ii ► ' O � � e k No ob'zs E~ ti,•, h I� j�.�-SAvE _ZS_V -►� .vo•o6•zs"E N 2s3z4 ' � ���3�s; � � h' , 2 ',� tb5•� I, NO.06'2S"E NO'Ob'2S"E e , No•oG'IS"E No•O6'rS! B!dLSAA'� ,-. , ,� 29 95.00 /6•/9¢6" Z7.Od /363 •' �i�' h ^+ 4 _ k d rs'E //z.90 LOT /�6.L TLSo 70.00 70.00 00 ¢ . t { c'io a �! ° b o of +� r z LA11iE 28 95.00 /6 /3'�9" _Z6.9/ /3.S_4 2 / n o° 0 7 t 7� Q; e o o A c o O ,� - � 4' /dFJ ° SS vz'2736'W�lf _ $ 1 0 4 88 //Y v O, 60.00 Z7 /5/S.OD O'a4 46' /9.79 9.d7 GJ4 N 47 /S'Z7'i✓�! - M o o /37 O 0 3 = \ �- - - 7 - 4 ' zs' lr, o h /46 Fo Y 5¢ /►'a6'4/ 3¢ E"GFJ ---- "' /z6 Z6 zs' zs' \ h n:' 26 2ZS00 /T¢O'S¢"" 69.4¢ 35.00 �6 Nd9.53'�S"r✓ ?¢3 -_-- -- - 53 NaG'Zd a¢'itW(P) NO.O6' 23"E -� /ZS.60 2 /Z?460 o - 25 SZS.OD / /9'39" /Z./6 6.08 25 N/Z°09'26'E /O.O/ --- - --- -- - i. l 2 --- --- -7 1 NO•O6'IS" 2/7L0 y No•06 23"E .v0•O6'ZS`E ^ i �� n� Z¢ SZS.OD 7 40'3S` 70.3a 3S2Z 24 a0 06'z5"E /ZS9 50 IV/ 369 EhP) _ -- h / h -- PLACE /3G / ----- - - -- - - -y -- oZ�� 2s' p o o ti ` 23 SZS.00 g'20;a9` 76.48 3d.3/ Z3 NO 06 '25 E 6/SO - -_-._ ^ i /i 'oc zs wE LOT W" Psos zo IA o /A I \''ti 150 --- -•-- N73'39 S6'iy/P 'o M zro V A�A�/37 w Y sstr . .V 06 2S E Z ZO �n q 1 ZZ S2S.0o S /3 03 a7d/ 23 92 ZZ No 06'ZS"E 62SZ 49 1A/70'03'Z47t/(t'J -- `^ /Z6.0/ I G °+ ^ ^' •�' PvE e "r n--- - --- - 2/ ° + - • _-_ _ _ _ _ � A'0.06'25"E �Ip• /- //2.60 60 -� / /ze_6o /Zero_ h, s e 3ZO¢ /6.OZ 2/ NO'06'2S'E ?.SZ aB w32 09 3o i✓(.P) - '� _ ' - - - v --- - - - ----- ---- i �*1 /9 S 02'07` •iG./f rJ.08 20 NS3 OS'ZZ"E ZSOS 47 I Al /O 3G PJ - -- 0C b M .M v (� o o p w ; �i07 s ZO SZSOD ° / p o 525.00 3•Z9'S3' 310.5 /6.03 /9 .vo•06'ZS E -Z.9° 46 N/Z 2d'/d'�✓(P - h ^ 7p i� I 8/ O h //S ,$ /�� o D of btu �No•^6 -s c fi/ / ,`w - r �:' �I -- 45_ NB7 06 ZO E R1 ^ " I �g2 0 0 /¢8 ° ^+� �n /d ¢5.00 /9'Sd 4Z /5.69 793 /8 No°06 ZS E Z.S9 r4¢ M15° •06'Zs-E �q Z3,~5 NO o66Or3 E NOZO�3 E nl ` /3D h leg L - /7 4500 S//O'32" ¢O./9 2/.55 / NO Ob'ZS"E /.SD • No O /Zdbo Sbo a wi - /1 --- -- e ; o a, es.sd -- - �y a /6 45.0_O_ S/°Z4%/" ¢037_ _ Z/.6_6 N - l� �' Q< I 4/ •� /28 43 NdB // 29'wGP ° - - _ /6 .t/SZ'3'5_ /,E ZL.37 h 2 0 h �o - --• - o -_ 42 d5 2/Zs t JI - c b Wh.. n o / 0 voro.'rs E I zs7zc /5 4500 a9 46 46" 3-9 09 ?o.87 - � �o s '` 0 4 o ti � � � o /S NO'06 'ZS'E 95.98 - j -_ * 79 I ,, 8(0 0 //(O 77 �I /¢ 45.00 _SO/802' 39S/ 2/./3 "I N66°OOS7"IV 4/ N4Z Z7/06(PJ o �t Mir No•o6'zs"E _, e - -- 3 i . I ZS' ZS' MInI M r 0 ZZ Z9%6" /766 B9S /3 N66 OD'S7"W ° ob rs E e, • _ y ��rs E No 06'25" �e -- /4 sae ---° -- Qrssz NQa63r�o�-- ,ze6o 34 \'� /33�, , - 40 A/78 /7°2 w/RI _ / HI � � 39 NS°SO.12i✓�.PJ h a' /Z 93.00 3Z•93?S" 53.98 2774 = ND 06 tS E /79/ 38 +V3S_O_7 /d /✓ q .� .�I - a 'LS' Zs•' I Ll__-� ¢s ¢ a h\� - ----- - - - --- T /Z _ _ 29.74 __ B I b (,� �'Jao O o o e /) ► NCi 107 0 G77.00 /O.34'/O 87.99 44./Z N // NSS°93 S7'N/ 33.05 37 ,v33'07 S/"E P3®S g 80 '� �., Y.Z�-8S o //7 ° 66.9c_ i2_easB� �s.16 J e V - - - - --- -- h'n O 6Q.6v s /O 47700 T/Z'26" 60.00 30.04 r - - - - - - -- n 4 ^ e• �� gt' N ^ O ZO_ �- - �n4� s 'op (l /0 NS3 4d SS EE/v /6t6/ 36 /V3Z SS"Di /'V Z38S •-'9 �' NO•oe'Zs'E Zn zo - / • 35 - E, �{ ----- ° `7 --. _--. __ --- --- ----- lv3 - ----._-. ---_ SPV/E h ,VO.Ob•2S•E \ 4�„1 9 a77oo 7 /z'Z5' 60.00 3c,o4 /s s /d ! -~ 9 Nd9'33'3-T 9.GG 35 /vb6.00'S7'h/ SS.48 Cr ,�� k /„6D /2e.so 2s' A10.06 zf"e _ _ 307_20 '� _ W i"� -4?• �' --- - ---- /o3.9a .. e - NNE -- - ° - -- . _ , NO.06'ZS' 3N0 O6'ZS"E GOT y, i.o0-" "`a• d ¢77.00 7*e5'0e•' 6174 309Z °� 8 +V89•S3'3S'W _9.53 _V Ive9 S3"3S w /S.6¢ W No•o6'zs E '-�+- ' S/L K TREE •i (,q 2?' vv•o6'z E" 369.35 Q 7 346.40 8'¢5 Pd" S2.9S P6.S3 7 NO'OS'32"ry 47.33 33 NO'04 //'E 34 02 ti ¢� IO°y' Q O I .� __ _ _ --_ 0 6 3�6.40 9,¢S'ad" 59.03 e9se 6 N05' 16IZS'EGP) _33.9/ 3z .VSZ'3S //'E -_S.GG 73 /7 8¢ o h /booc ize6 T ize6 �a.eG �z.eb - Q U I J C} S ¢7S,DO 7 47 46 64.63 3Z.37 $ rVs2°33'ZB A/ 3/e0 3/ N53'c� 2r w 2S.05 e 5 P � ' o /2e.6o I q ' �y ! I�' �, q " a 475.00 9°4S'48" 80.9¢ 4057 _ - /vas°37'37 E ZB03 e `� I q No•a6 2s`6 2 �, M Q; !bh h h 46 �A a ¢ N6Z a4 SG"E /_7./O 30 _ M h 01 O bI I O h� s/ �,c : �Q o o b;3 " h' � � /23 �Im' /24 10 -3 475,00 8'4S'Ze" 7Z.1,0 36.•37 3 N /'GIG'.//'E •/8.35_ 29 /Vd9•S3'3S'IV 7.Z/ 14�h� h _ a \' O v� /ZD /Z/ /ZZ �i ^ �ti �, b �� "'I J i$ I ti �° a N.a N h JIti h• Z 27500 /3'06'/2" 6e.$9 3/Sd 2 +va4•s3'.7s"rd ZdZB Zd �'/°9d'4e~/v -_26.97 8Z o,l ;� 8.3 io //9 '`'Q \ :' \i� `Iq \ q \ qy. /25 / 4/0.00 S'/S'00" 37.57 /C.80 / /Vss'o6'2S"E 28.Zd 27 v44'OZ'S7"K/ /6.32 '� ° �A/21 ! �•Radius(R> 0ii iG) Ienglh(L) Tongenl(T) gear/n (B) Len lh& 9 /s77S /ss.bo � /oe.6o ® •_ 60.00 7e.e6 7z," 7ze6 �I ,ze6 1 1 ` Tao, 1 t� .v0.06 .ZS"E a//9SNO'06�tS"E { - oeorl/7 6B/ zen lirf�J 9 p M .37 1I C(IRVE DATA L/NE .4r4 C/NE DATA $ cor S.f/4 Cow Sec./6 939.10 -.. I� 30 A�7 4Sbs S9s.70 i� ds.zs Fv 181 - - //0/. 75 C/ 5ec /6 ratQl e.�p EastLine sw�Sec.,C M5�jz DEEP CANYON "°°�"z�"E ROAD U0i - 0003 AUG 0 3 IM • SHEE T 3 OF 3 SHEE TS W,1 Cnr. cSeC./G. / if- Na9•S2'3S"E__ 2656.Ot �Fd© C%s B2c. /!o. l� ONUMENr4 r/ON MON. /D. ❑ OESc. rA6 OEPrW REF, �1 ,�'>r ��i--30'R/W for Street purposes by `N� g q 14'/,P. Co.sure %4 Cor /3 Alff 77/3Z NW Cor., SdV� Sec �767) 5 ' I Oeed recorded lJug. /9, ,93,6 4� / �, �o i irJ Book 292, Poge 233. / / 9 5 Rebor RCE 19039 0.3up None Center Sec,16. in rockmaund I� \ C 3/4 /.P None 0.5 MB 45149 SW Cor. Sec/6, In, mow. we// O. 3/4-/P None Z.O Co. Ties SE col-, SW/4 Sec 16 I f` A L_, !`W LI 6SFl " T �`( `�� � � \\ E R.�?S,oike None � M,6 B 407 Accepted for ig lnt. P1 /O RCE G284 0.0'b was/inP t4i ' r ` M ° / P. Co.Sury 1.5 Accepted for j Int. i L / /i• /�, �j' (�r`?� / C-� t- 4_ ;-. fd ;�52° �t ' 9�`�.p ��� H /j"1,P Noiae 0.7 MB46/75-76 Accepteot for Tract Boundary /`/P RCE 6ZB4 07 Mg 46/75-76 Accepted for ¢' Desert.Star j //I9t 78729 FTeC. 8-Z/-G2 (t 30'R/DV for Street ,ourPosPs O,Z s�E �� 'L \ d AN4"%P RCE 6294 0.7 MB 46/75-76 0/3 So,0.i6 E OF 7% C or. I° by Deed of Oeo'ico t/on ,3d �zs 7 5 \ K 3/4"1P RCE 6ZB4 /.O MB46/75-76 '� 4 Z 30. 5 9" ��� L /"/.P RCE 6Z84 O.d MB4r6/75-76 Accp ted for 7racf Corner a recorded Feb./O /964 4 by / I� 05 //7st No. /699/ /B9 T+3°9�� �, m� 4.4a C..S� �/ /"/.P None /.5 MB46/75-76 ACCepfedforTracf Corner /eeal o for Street purposes C- N 1-¢"%P RCE 6Z94 /Z MB46/75-7G 0.06 So, 0.03 w a/'t 1nt. Deed of Oedicotia� recorded � �^� V {� 5�B' �" p 5 �� / \ b �' ! I I Feb. /O, 1964 as/nst No. /6 99/ _ ,, _ -� • 5b N / pN ��, Z7 �� / O "LP RCE 6ZB4 0.7 �1846�7S 76 O./O do,0.08 wok N, � *4 Q I �` .So /ihe Gast. Are.7B7Z9 Rsc.B�i�G2 _ _ _ - I - 596 =o / P 114"/.P None 0.3 MB46/75 76 Accepted for ¢�Erin S't. h Q O I---�--- - - - - - --- - - - - - - - --------- - ---- - ---- -- -- - - • a. R U T L E D G E p:37.g3 pOLpf A = z w p /¢ N Y 0 3,a RCE//B42 MBSo B9 -T-- H /` Q $z� R /'"/P. RCE1041? Z.S MBSO/dB-B9 �t �l N/9'S/'49-IY 759.so I `d�RnGd3.30 5 `:- .7 r �9 /O L` ! I nCce ted t2r /nt. L i N • 7*3 0°/ r'2`` \ 5,pit o N A 1b� T_ v 5 /y4"/.P RCEA976 0.3up MBSO/dB,39 0./0 6L), 0.38w. of Tr. Corner \ I Y I �4 ��- \\�� 41 J » / r MB 39/3Z 0.09 fib. O.56 w 0/' 7r Corner 0 \ b NS9•S/I9"IV r GOZ.S0 R= O. � Z' ` / t - _ _ _ - - - r hJ _,o �¢ o Y 32 A�� / U /4'%P RCE62d4 0.5 MB46175-76 O.Z/ Jo,0,3/ E. of Tr Corner. s7z// 77� 77.L6 7786 7d07 70.Z8 7549 M.70 7a.jz - -�- Z 4 �' \z P / 4W �� �-4 2I 2 2 Z . 0 Z o h�� o`a \ 6' N , �/ /"/.P. �PCE62A¢ 0.7 MB46/75-76 O.0-I N. 9.B5 v - c, o :7 o v; ! 2 u 2 t o w �, a,1.� 13 /Z \" i / W /"/.P RCE 6 Zd4 0.7 MB46/75-76 ` p,\ � \ 0`4 �� 28 51 � � \i•. c* Acceveed for � /nt. O.Np'.� O �„ w A L;`,!o w. \ o / /LC7e A �7 � o tP"' � '�� � X Z'Y Z" RCE/do39 •a 3 :��4 Y w S h �D glti / a 8 4Io 9 \ �Q oil I� a�n // S� �" f \ y �� /'� Y RCE/8039 0.4 None , �! �/0 Z°" ¢a l01 f`'%'- \�/ 0/,�. �/ \ ((� 1/"./P RCE/9079 g None b Z I 1 i`i•?l f I[-�a ..f I% b�il�v:J�ila�� i4'/3 a 9 4- 35 5.°S' S0 �.r Q f.� IO.I/ 7Za4��_ 77ii 77d6 7407 74!Zd 7/.I! 7d.'O 741Z ' f ,/ \ �Fd F 11 89°sa"�e-IE I I I I 7S3.79 I IR=/OZ5.e0 ;ReL-4' 1^ j / Q�' /W `� ` (� 1 I �7S3.7d M6 46/75-76) �O Ad'H❑ �L '. /e /V 15w- ZO I I I I R ,� i 'e � �• / �1� Al i ' O I� R� /b '/\ \ 1G1 Fd \ I o V sza �182 C/ \ 15 Z `y O `o I Fd.© 30'R/hV per OBed recorded 'CalQ� ,5 54 ° S � , R' \ .32 --- ii m Nov. ZZ, 1965 as last No.1.92266 0 / 0 5 , Z \o `� SZ 360.60 /e'46'¢a" //B/9 59.63 ESeRr STAR BLvO 7zdsi /728.9f8 MB " 75=7Ye - -- - - - ltoo _ �f �� 3�-"f \ �. - -----� ---1 //g ec. / ' !�=13 /8 51 4,05.50 2P°/3 t9" 157.29 79.6 5 ass•s3'sdE rsass r i V /BZ s - 1 ! " \ O h' \7 o_a 3,3 SO 343.00 /Z'36'45" //9.53 60.0/ S !B o N '\ � ' 49 1515.00 O'44'¢6" 19.73 9.87 • t .- s 69 9 7- y, c .�¢ �, Zoo , O/ AVE 44 I a a �r- �TJ \ p{`s lO o UE i // �°o/ 4e 4Z6.50 40/3'/7" N.4Z /5. 7Z Al e!�•sa'za E t165Z 37 fd-� ° !0 !d P '• dC �d0 1 $� �s 1 % � �� �; 3S 5 t3 3 �.3 i ^� 47 40S,SO 40/3'/7" 29.8E /494 yy 46 Z31.51 29 34'46" //9.5Z 6/./Z s�4 cor&C O } r. �, v ��gC p0'. /B i�s� b d/ ` / ° SwCaU►l.Sec./G y �4w .� -d���`„ - ,. Y j `� 6. ZB°4� �r F .36 N: Z� ° 1t3 30 •_;��,� ¢S 256.5/ Z9'3¢'46" /3Z.43 G7.7Z a 1 Z \J - a -� t�' / `�"► ^:a I. 4a /?Z6./s 1•z9 60" 9Z.os /6.oz a 1, U T lv, I 1l f�i 38 Z5 n e N 9 43 LMJ v 4 r 050.00 L'34'Od_ 52./2 Z'G.09 t; "•� * �� °' 38 +'� '° �,45b' r, ' '1 40 543.00 Z'45'09" Z6.09 , y�" A 1334,y' jG %44�65 Z\�5 pdE h 9°5/'36" 93.44 46.d4 - G � i 40 404.50 Z°48'// 20,d7 10.44 C6? .� -s c 4!O �. io /= 1 �(" /l.J .S(O V' p•�_ . 39 4Z6.50 S.ZB ?Z'�� l465°0 L0�.34 i �� 0 0 0 �C/ � 38 430.50 8°Z6'30' 63.43 ,31..77 9000 D ' ' 37 3d4.50 40/3'/7" 28.33 /4./7 N /4 /. Bosis of BPOrings is the L ornbert 6P-10, F017e 6, ��'� c A N w �� 36 1515.00 4°53'Z6" /29.31 64.70 County Of R/vPrs/de. Porto/a is Al O'G�'/i"E�MB�9/G7l w� z ../� R°1 515, 35 /S/5.00 Z°38's0" 70.ao 35.00 2. /nd/CoteS found Monument os noted, w �� a � 3s 'w c -'� i ` J • ` A Jam¢ �, !4 34 1515,00 Z'42'Q4 71.71 35"d6 3. o /ndicotes set Monument per Cify of o . __-- Po1Xn OeSert Stor7dord M-/. �� �� z�s a 9!' ?Z Qo r. 53 \. A\ `r�r e Wi y �9 33 /5/5 00 310 '44" 8009 ¢4.05 4. Set Z Z" APedrvood Slake, f/u5h, of all reo� dot '• F� , s-/ N 5z i• °� O /5.00 O 4'01" _23.80 //.90 Corners and&55 otherwise noted. \� u� '. A 5d.93 Z _ - _ _ _ ECrn..Ot2B 3/ ZG6.5/ 2934'46" 106.61 54.SZ 5, Leod Plug 0 M011 set /n 5/deW01k 0/ 0// Lot \0 � P• S� z 7i56 sue. �B so Ba_ \ � •�• '�� '.T � 79-�` Nd9•s4'S'`. _Se..^a �- �- / 30 ?75.00 Z'3d'/9"' /2.66 6.33 Comers od,/ocent to streets. V \ o ",'? NB/,s7•s6.E g7/o 77,Z3 Na `s.'s = �7,690 6• 7h/S Troct CO/7toinS 53.6d Acres, 6rO3S. \ \ \ rQ 97.ZB 89gy 1-2 ( 29 /¢65.00 O°47"30" 20.2¢ /O./2 ` � 2oPUE- 2 79./9MB 1 \ /� � � ^ �� a �. � 3 ZB ,985"60 _ _S• `� ti Vti Z7 /OZ5"80 O 33'3/" /0.00 5.00 �� n 0 AA h 0 ¢8 ti N �7 q e�?G�_' t� 26 477.00 /'ZG'26" 11.99 6.00 �, O SD Y9 v Z5 9/0.30 3 /O'3S'" 50.4G ZS.Z4 24 /465.00 2°16,06 40.00 29.00 6970_ dd.57_ 7s.so _ 7ias 23 46.5 00 0Y" 74 Z/ 37.10 r' Nd9•S/ 4B"6' �JG.lZ ---- - - - -T// /� �j R ' 1 Z°54' 41 4 N99'S/'40"'E _LOB_ O_ _ - 3o6._ZO.__-__--.--- F��'% rS ff t G 4 a� vB9°saJs.E Fd® ZZ ZSG.S/ 9'Z¢'Z9" 4Z./Z Z/.11 f. -css 71 ✓ < 21 056 5/ /Z 030 48 3/" 56.00 z8. O Fd _ _ �y� �? `+ N89•S/'4B"E 906_/8 ^�I_ f�B T,7 �r i?� , ao Ne s%Q ZO 256.51 7039'46" 34..31 /7"/d IN THE C/T Y OF PAL M DESERT, CAL IFORNIA � � - - 16 - - -- _ 6/./B 87.00 d/.SO d/,30 s5 �-s oUE ; /9 1338.25 "3 03'4/" 7/,50 35.76 o /d /338.ZS e°5¢'0.9"' 67. 79 _73,90 CT 8237 / A V ti AA "�:' O v 17 1.339.. 25 3'3/'ZO"' eZ 27 41.15 / ` 42 hO 43 h � Y�I o ¢s �� ¢6 }� /6 /338 25 4°OZ'S3" 94 SG 47.30 V`► I Z 15 /338.25 3°321i" 8Z.67 41.34 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORT/ON OF THE Q a 4/ 2 a2 14 lo2sdo 6°/Z'23" //1. /z ssb/ /.ii BZ.00 d/so et4o 13 /OZ5.80 4050'33' 94.70 43,37 /� iNe9^s4I,��� ,CBI_v/�-52� Fd❑ /Z 1OZ5.90 4'48'45*' 86.16 43..11 SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16. T°56., R.6E. , S.B.B. 8 M. l I � ? // 1025.dO 4°46'516" 155.63 4ZB¢ PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS MA Y, 1977 ' f �1�' �f� ' �f`� ' f�9 � ��`� ' j`J `� /© 1005.60 4.451/Z" 85.10 4Z.97 - 9 W5,d0 4'43'25" Y457 4Z3/ SCALE .* /M : /00 ' 6.y;:�l gf:sk/ V11_1_ 6c UN17- d loe5-eo 4•Z5'33" 79.24 ".64 7 N_12 36'05'W( - 7 9/O.30 6'14'44" 99.23 49.66 ��f+'/ /-- ; 6 �✓o'OS 47 lt/1RJ - 6 910.30 4°5Z'/0" 77.36 .9g7/ 5 meV1d'3S"E 478Z 5 910.30 ¢'50'/01. 76.e4 3844 4 NO.06 '/2'W g9 7d 4 9/0,30 4 048'10' 76.30 39,lB 3 NSZ•3S///'E 945 3 9/0.30 4'46'/O" 75,7e -77.91 2 NSZ°3S'//5 06.97 2 910.30 O'44'10'" 75.Z5 37.64 910.30 4'04'5/" 65.36 32.70 BPoni7q(B> englhfG) RodiuslA�0e/to(�►) Le fh(�l on e17�ir L/NE- DQr4 CURVE D!TA UO/-0003 AUG p 3 wy 7 7 7 A tl 7, 14; �777WINIWMWT,7 7-7, C'Va Q717 L,� Iq -7 7,T Z mi wusst Afo 4 4#4 FS1 "A A S 911itlar e r es. c r Pe 7� *��U; 174 J': A 4, # -p ZIPS a/. Pox. -2, 7�, R 490 . ............. `sf, ta ,y (0:0A to 9 1,Njv 77r� *4 'v7 4 170 mnv (44, �0�71e A 4 � 3.� Ph Z,751 line Ir '08 - , - I -,, 6 Schxl 150 Alo. 78729 A 467, ;7— -7 777 ,,_77 -4f!V WA -kvw, '40,4, 71m Zr ro, 104 145/17&Vk ?91?, 70 4b 140 too 14' df,5,-RT MIDDLE 5CHOOL f 10)ly6d bst 9 /,(99/ 110 114. L Liv/4 &e of panel ctoveyed /0 Fehrory 19; IY64 as 1#3�A/6-,9PY1- dlo chool 015/r/c/ j9e,--d 7*7,?g 1)0 87 7 lot If Oil" 75 Iry 26 1 74 &par; j T�pt 71 7�, ;7777 7 7 , C, -27 P& DE Fq T STAR VD. 35 S7 70 41 'b- 55 :2� 00 4�To 77 Ty 47 c, -------- -No* S ;?AYN, r 37 42 4(o 7 71� 17 16 VEI 4RDO Dql VE Z E\1 tS E'.D CORP, APPRC7AL BY 4 DRAWN By FILE Nb )41 ------- 71-g�j 114Vy MA, &?V7 CHWKFI) A y AP7-!STFQED CIVIL FNGlIiF�R Ke SCAI F ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS LTD. 0--4 AT y T55 N0 PIEVISION" DATF 8 PROJ. vf;R COMMUNITY PLAN NEO S-DEVELOPMENT r=NG1 - . - . - - --" -1 a, •$^Y: ..,..,,,.- a'`•rE__s,'±4F'„3+C,:.-.4.r..'�i-.a- a .>:. -, _. 8 o z V � _ t ` - ~ ... � ! _ .. , 120 1121 1 Z 2 - � I24 125 I , _ is , F.P. F. 1� 9 4611 F. +8. i Ef , �f.� Ir03.5 f�f rcee.7 / ' V R y PfcOP. 1 � C� T P' K LIh.� �l Nt _ S IGE WALK = TYRE_ ( PET Ica SIPS �� - r .'. 4-: -..-y-.•.-..+•_...per..,...,_:•w-,..___�...,.. y __,__----.-_—. ...�_..,_..,,�.*.,----•-•----....i.s.w,..«_.._._._ - - 771 vf rk � RI �N Y - ., T►" . r i z { a a� .lam, _ .,s .. .M.T h r p �— A � F PLAu t 2.Co ``� 4 12-7 ' d� + t . . . 1, .,... TV 24 d' ,s. ,. vt? i .. .pA,b � - y F :,. + `V'. '`�-�,� � .. ._.a <.. >+ #1`-» s �.,;•., : a. -. .. _ ., ,:;4 '- ,�. ,'. ti �', '. a:' Y'• "fix - .16 ,� �c: �Q �` ,. „,� .,_ - • psi Air ' 1 P�cF' 15 3 � +14 ' 1 �� 172 F.F. I7p.A f,F, f�F 1�3.4 s 7! f�F. t7 t 4" a3: T x d+ ev _ LL �. PROP. LAN SIDE.Wp.�►C : cc ^' .. ,a . -..:.t ._....,..d_..,_._.:; : ^. �,• ;, r .- , i - '�. ,. - -- -a,+. »----•,+-ter-"-r-- ,%t s. .,- . +Y ' a I CITY OF PALM` , DESERT} i d �. .� • RM F ' .� T ArWT v I ROXSERVICES ENVI . ems. "'I ?Ak -. a q ( g 2 G.G. ,�: C C RES.N0. APPROVED B —�----. a u P.C..RES.NO.__._,.,,, STAFF LETTER t I -8. ACTIQN FORM - LL QJ�zOatILL k .r' I(Q CONSTRUCTt am CQ +HENCE 1MITN111 , Y ;d �? GDN4•.' ¢l...AC: axIt YEAR OF THIS APPROVAI.. V CITY OF PALM DESERT dt 1 - # Ev�� YEfRT; Y.1EEP ,HOt ES _ G► p,DE DEPARTMENT OF NVIR� ONMENT�ILd j i . SERVICE S , I '�' EXHIBIT (CkWUT X.IN. ' Gi kA.GS� -- f � , GONG +t3 L K. SE--.��.._..� ►.� a, WAZ , �. * f2 + 4 t..r_ 4 __f 71 , _ 4f OF 1 t • r xra.r��.,rasc•Ir�16 ••: ar-s uAr rs<,r kec' .n..�s.r ....i y sriTlrla 4AAWNT NW%%L0 fie• HtPC�rrD �(�T y:GEr11.YS v ., t� FAT B1uiTWi :tyEivW:. r Otis*? Jr.* r •ram � .,•:u;i Y EGA/ Ve,ytoo .^s•[ PACIFIC RIM AM? Me'j' dill ••" s. b fr K ISS ,l+F, A x % ..�...� 1 NVllt t)IFIC L CONSULTANTS lTDIL •wn.�•wirr r••.ww.nrroraysior•reewr swonnr<n� `(�} y�-J �;>' 1-1—W 'r �, "e, �­�­-, ­ '' '�,�', �,Nri, , I I - "- ____ - 1_.�!�,, . r;-..qpvww�- I I ,�-" I z I �l I�:�� I" "'m ` -T_"q-�, I- __- " � ,-7,�-­­_�WT 1'1� -�_ _ , , ; '�lll I�'�19_r�'lm I MW mm""P'11� . !!.. ow I i� 1­11 a mflpqp�1- - '1� I - "I ,�,11- - _T1 "m W � lommpppw `�M�_ W ITWTW�- ,� I ,I MR - --T I ��" I lMR7TlZ — � , . "I'll' ' .. ­ ­ I _____ - -t2 1 . . . I � ......— "� ,:: 7 ,,F, �l 7-�. � ­ . I ___ -,--- - - - - - - - �� "I �� ���� � I �,�.­ : ."I'll-lW_­i__"_, I- __ _�­ , I " , � I I --1 - ­ - I � " v,.�� I I , r — ?t I, � I I , 1� � , �! 11 I I - �, ! .. 1� In , �,`'24_',� ­ � �.11 I 1��,,�_,_,_ �l ,- 11 , � �. I -1 IK 934' , - 11 - AA " �_:,, I -1 �1. '01,rt7174) ! i� Ax, 3114-1,61wk _ 11 - "I _', �l - -____ --- ____ I --- � .....I , I -1 I ; ,,, ­11 ­ �­ ft � I , �� - - . - ______­_ ------- - _____ - `�7�-_ , -_ I ,_ - - ­ -- - - -_ � I -____ - - - I " - - � , ", I" F__ --7-- - ­ ,____ -_ -_ ______ -_ - - - --- -_- -- ! ,� i I . ; i I . ,�,117 . _� , __+lzl______ :�� I � *_1,I - �� i , . �. " I e 11 1.11 - � ! -, N . 11 - ,I I - _ ;', � I I - --1- ­ /67/�np vewo, - __ - - - *` I � i I -- �-�, � - " -- I ­111 __ ­____ --- --- "I'', �i � �� 1. ��. ! I , le I --- - I (_ . w&- a/1he &vm*est ;;,� � ", � . �, I I I �x C V,­ I -_ , � 11 ��lll '.1 -A'4',4 ,G� I �� /G, $ell /�7 IIC,9.:Iw_ll A � - "' . � pk,��� i I � I I ,olr- .11 . I . - 1*9 . ,�, � -, , -�, . .419 - -4(or1r,ecsi ra, ,../-d I li _ �;ll �­ , 1 .1 I'�, I,1_1� � 7.j 1 , I I � : I 1 I� I I I - 1 `17 1 , I __a,��, �.,' 1 114 k��, � . ; � ,I �� ; .5e,ztvo A, "gs, ,,F. � -, ,;,- � , ..�. .1 � I �I I — � I , . �7 '. 041" i I I 1�' 1) ,I 1;,­ 1�1 I , -P, " '. I - - V4 c4z7,7e/ I I I i ,!_',�­ ��I I 1. ,- - -7-i rl dl &yw I A,/Ogr m I ......�. I � �, I 4?15�"IZIAW 5 � , * , , _­ " "I',l�I I - , _ I I - : � __�,_ ,� , , �,7�* Afl A I - ,.,..,� _ �., - 11 V . - - 11 ­_ Z IN�w 4 _`_-, , 11� -,,, � I- F - / I ---I-�-- -- .---------.--, - - — 1! I I I"t ".� � . I I ! � . . .- _____ - __ , j 5"d�Af. I , � � , -I . I - r ,�* 1, � I �l - � i I I - 11 � —_ . I I----- 1. - — -_ ­ —_ ­ - ----- ---- ---T i �,Ne m r " I I � � i -, ---------T:--, �� 1..� I , " I- 1 I - _, 11;, i I . , 1�. .0 i *d ad)�� -�,. � I I I'll", � I i f 1, I 1, , __ _�, ,., -�,,,," " � � :, 1 .� : ��' .-- , , m ! I I ...I I 1.1\i I., , � I ,�,- , " , � I ,) 177 1 1 . I i , 11 I I...I , ,,, � 176 ' ". I I --�_ I I r­- I I lllll�Z,I _1 I � � : . I I T_ �� � : '.1 % Il . .1 , � :I . . i , , I , I . 1\ I "I - I - '1�1 � . , I I I 11 I I ,� ­ I 'll " �1111 I . 1. , _- _1,�� �� I I I � t �11," I ,t ,, " I- __ ,�,.,4 - , .... \ , , , 1�� � , � �� �� .� .� .���t", � I ! �f �11 I �� , - - � . �411 � I , � ., . - -1, I ,,-- " - � �­' ; i � _v - - . 11, ,�1, -, I I ­ � ��... I . __.____________-. - / t'r, N, I , ��_.... ­ P r I *l` ,,�� , ­ . � . � I I i I L__ , ,I � I� . � . 1?1616 to ;%A I - AA .1 i5 � I r, �. I � - ��l I. �11 � -.- � --- - ,�l ., "� �; , t I � -1 � I M 1, M z 1�- ___ ! / IQ - 1_4 li- � � I 1-1 - I I I � , � - _`�____ - - '.__� 11 I i,� " , ., ll� ,- � -, ____ `­ " : I " _ � � , - 1.11 I - , , I- - . - I , I , I 1# , , I : - I I I "�. � ,4_; �_ - I '', ! I- I ­�-1-1 I I i -__- �n7- �4'­! - I � ! (�., I - ; I - , I I I I I I ,'I�, ­ . V_ � � I � - � -_I - I / I'll , �,I'll . ; - � I I �l -\/ ­-, -.1- - I 'I __ � -- I � .1 ( "v-1-1 -', I�l I ­.� I I . I ll \ i i , I-� - ', / I - 4- / Y/,ler: 03L IFY -'vp,lv ad �xn 11 �� - IZ, 'i, ­ - ,�_ � "I'' �� I . � I ;, - - 17 1 , -- � I �� � "I,," 7� t � " - _" �, :,, ," , , -i. r ! I , �- : . — --_ , 'It", �, ,� I � _ ,� 11 , , . � i - . I �� , 11� '�'%'' "�ll 1-1 � 1, , - ­ ! ) _. I ­ I , 111C I _. - .,!� . I'll -. ___ .. � � I I-1 I �­- , ;:,, . : �I ", I � I - i g � � ,�_��, �71�4�, t.I "­ I , __ 'A I - ---.-- ! _____ / : � I ! i "ill - I 'k� I ,�`�lf' I - I I I � 1- 1. ��,- I � , "''__ IV- I _,'' I � I 1� . I - . �� "11 , . , � ZPS 47�YIO Lla^l 9" .1 I I I _ _� I- "­f,-,- , I" � � I i '� -4 lz - , -11, I _ � - , , 11 I �j �l ! ___� i - - -_ � .­ I ____ - - - i 5&0 4ollmlx Ayd , i �t,-�% ,,�, ",­,"', , , I ; i .. ,� , _'.�� -i'_'. :��; �,, I - � � , I ­ I I, , ri, - ---.1 I. I ­ , ,; , , ,._ 11, � � I ,�i� , ,;P I . ! I � I . :" , ­ . I 1��:l ; l,,__l_,_,,, �!��,, � � - ,__-- ,*,--. "� I - I I _ ',l ,, -- ,, // i - -_ f I ,. I ­�, I I . � ,,__ L ., I 1�1 I , 11�,t 1;I - '. - /85 /66. . I I , - I �� . I � I - I -1 I - AM- AA"r- 54 *. ) - - I I. ­ . I r, - , 'F'."Ii � i I � , ,.�', I _ ,,,,I ll� I I �� , , �, , ; Q i -i I ,_,,� , ��_ � !p r-i � , . . -, , 2 1 1 1� ��,,_:, 1 I - - ,i , I,- k I I � f , I �n liq ­ �.­ I , I ,,"I."I' ,_� - 17 , , . i 11 �: , ". i ' .� ­i, � � �, ��� I I : � I "I � I i i ! � � I V_. i i . ,_____� � .3, Aldo.- Aw. -'C4 420' ,��W 1 �,�, I, , I I , , I ", . ! A "l , w _f , ­ i____- - ­ ----' __ � I I- _.. __ I lj,�, -----.------ , ­ � � - � ! 'I", I ­­�. 11 I ",W 1. , I I . ,� r, - C wml re�� Co- I I_iv :� , I� , ,� . I . ',�, � � I., - ---� \4_� � , �� � � I , O/ I �, � �l . : 7 ! I �1 ______ I I � i . ��, I I A WOW m �, "T I ., y I I I �_ -- --- - I � VNI . .1 I _ ��, I � ; I I . I _5,i,�,,: ­ I :V ,a� �,��, . � ! . I zkf 'n�_S_-RT EWM&Al., y- PA,qA( � ; I I I - _,! ,�l 1, I , 4% Wdfl m- Ap. (2//f, 4�� 4:�, .11, J1 � : . � � . :g / 701 rtz�i � I . , I ., - I-,- , /01 I �, 1 1 �l , . i - i I I � fl-* '�%,­, �l _�tl . ; I . 1 , i 1�1 n I I - \A I �,I�`,`S. ­� I I I � I � C-41 , ; -_ ­�;� � I ,, , �I I I I , , , I I I 1, " _�`it��', I i 1��11 -11 I , ­ 11 -,"',- I I I �v I /Ze, I I �) , p , —Foo— V� ,�� . l , _� I, I: I ; We- - ,C VC WP i APC5,0 C14-A.P-0 x/i/) 1 �,�4 I ; I . i IZ6.6 1?9.16 , � , " 124?.6 - /Vio i . I .I ,11 � � I I � - ____ - . ,�, -..--4 - -- I �l 5eawr - - , . I -- - -'- " I -F-�- I I I /Z81 6 �l I f _____---------__7 I I -11% I L',YC WO' Soo/laq Severi :,, zj%, "I — I , I , c 0 , ll� . � : � i � ! I I � . - i I � I'll I I . ; I ��I I � �: �"�� 1, 1. �­� ,;',, I � I � � � ILI\ ---__: - ­_ ! . I I . I I 1 . � _ ; 4 3ettwts pa- ,f-/ 3007IM7- � �1.11�, I l ; I � i ,t, 'r I c— ,�, 11 I I , A 1, � I I I--,A I �, I �' - �z . ��� i � I I -� ,� i ,Z, 01 ; ; --,, �� 1: ",; - # I ," � I I I I r -. I I I - I I I �- ,� I,�, � " I�Fl "" �1 1�5 � "'t . , ,,� 4:,,$', "we .),- .,-,I I VA, I I I .,_ � , 5.,'!,"Ol'I Ilt'110 ,��A,- _�In�le Avaly ,f6ldW,wl, �(�/ ,;,,�­'t,o�,",,, , I � , ,�l I "I e, ,-�,-,��:.,er ,,, m % ao I �: � , $0, 1, 0 "I -.1, I � I - w - - "" . - � - - tl- -, , , .:�- 1 �2 _ , I - .,11- , _ 11 � ,,�, I I . I - , , I '1�1 �� I ­I -50 _ * I'll", - I ,, , - I ')i . �, - I I i . I I � I ;" " � � - . I , . ­ I, "..r I'll � � � � -, , - il7,,,!,- , -lc� -,,t, � Oe,j 1`11_1,� ; _'. , :4 1�� F _� .. - , , i Se/w/ " v, � ! � ie�, , i__�- 41 54��5 - am .1�$ �jmfffo .�Ow pIfIfIct J "' -� I i I , i ­ ') -1 _ , . � � 'e4- I 1. � .1 I,-,-1111­1� �,_/,I..,S/ , 1,,� I � I , I . .. 40,457 4ff 1 .� - , � , , I . , �l - � I I , �' I r Zo".�?,�­ � \�\______ ____i____ - _____­__) \--.-- ______ _ , __.. __ _ - - , . \------- r- -1 ��.� //;, , I , � . I lll'_;",",I � � ","F� I . . - 4- �' ,A� \-- 'o :.. , �:'lll I i ----_-- -- �l I I I ", � I ��l � 1, �I , I "� I � I I I - t � - �, I ,; � , . I � '' , ��, - ` -, i - , 7 ��Opvle qmde-5 V , It�I" '_ I I �- I I. ,f;7..;;q I - ­ ,, , i"s,'amp",/ /� , - 1 I .1 I I I ��I�l I I �, ! �, ; �l I 11 I � : '114, - 1, 14- ''o, I " . f � il,�� . � � i � , " ,,I \A) � , -1,1,4. 1 9.,IdjfaoW de"k d wA .im�/e f eva'er,rd �A; ­I � .1 ,"', I I , , � ',I'., t. I �, I : _�� . i -1 � I I I ", � 11 , � 1. I � i,. 'Z'-­ , - -I ., " ... 4' �77 9, pro?osd.3 11 " , , IF, _k�z ,,` ,ii�� , o - . I - i I � i 01 11 ­11 r, lL`.4'L_­_.­_ __ 11 � ",,,i4 , �- �- . "I; �..�:l - I - "'' I ll�, �_,,' ­ I__ .01 &A F/Y. 6. $tdf /,O?, /0,1% lvn� 4 rm.O i'l . - ,,� - ­ i - " I v I I I , � 11 - .1 I I � 11 : �l , . .,.P,- -� ,�.l I ,I - I , :��, � i I , I ! I , , _0 ,,�� . �I .11 . . ,11"­ -, . I ,,, , ,� I I , ____ . " I I `� " I " i -- am F�� , i, t­_ ., � I xj, - � !,� i -- �� I I I � - � . � I I , I I I ,,': I , , ­r I i� ��­ -71;- � �� - ­— "I v b.- I � _� I I . . , " . I I � I I I 1,­­ I �` � 11 .1 �, � . I . , ,, I 1� ; I I ! _,71: I I , I — ­- ­ , �� _J_ to. 6"_ 1, � � � ,; - , , I ; � , I . . I I !,� 7111 , � �1� I ! I ,­,_� I - I 1*1 ! 'f I IV, -, 1 � I I�, - I i iff�FT - , ,� ­_� I I , , I I � I ; - ," � - I ,I,, ,, � � I I %­:_ 1, I I .1� I , 1 _,:_4 1�-.,�,,­11,�� , I ' 'I I � 25 1� I," A, , �, �� �, - ___., �� -1 1, - . I � I,I't � � ! ­_ �� 1� I � �2�,'' . ­.-L6.1-�-.1-, I-LA., I I �� . . "� i 11 ... ­ - R! � AkAmMum-, - 11 1, �21 �,_ ,;�_. I � , I " I _ ­ " I 1�_ . 1�- " madi"m -I �1­71F_ _________ ­ I '1111 � ­ . LA . --- . I _., 1 . I Ir ���­-. . "I - - ­; �4� ! I I ­ I � 11 '' ­� I I - 11 '111","­ , � _.��__ik�-2 9VA--lL,�--t ,"­ _-, .. I ­, .!"ll I I I lll­lvll��� ,,,rr .� /z -vqf �,�,.',,I ; ,` , . -­t­ -_­ - , -, - I 1. , p - - �`_,e 14 d ­ . 11 of-*40�. l - -�.,A� I I ""W_ rA____I -" � __ --- - -_ ----- 11, ( . I '�L_ - I I I �l 1­��_'�,_ "I�I", � I ___l"1T7MWpWW� _,��A�_�A.r".,�._ I -11 ! I � 1�1 I- � I � I I I'� 11 - ,F 14 �11- ,T;T.y,_,_--,,-­- � , I � - mfk�. I —_�71.1�. w1wrm"'Irl", I �l t I , ,�l I I I �I � � ­ - - , -�,.�il . ��. I I � .w��, V/ W,?,, 4� ,11"�(I,,�,rY,�%scb . :� ,I I � I �� I 11 �,� � ;, ,1111 i �i "", I , � i I I'll A ..�:"_,Ql i� ",, , .. �I 1 �a , , I . 1 ." I .1 *I- I I I I I : ,,, 2-­­1 �1, il , , ., �l "I " I � � �. 'i ,,, , I ,� �, I �l ''I i,l�l 11 � . I—'' 1­1 I ;t-,,� ­F,�O_ler " 11" . ,v,�'�­, '. , .. I , , ", . 14 - - I - � I -, i -_ . I I � 'u, r - "�q I_- R� V , , I , - � � I , � I : - " � , , , � ", - , -, I I I; , ,� ,I 1� �� -," I � . !n/,5 .'� Mt ", � � : ,�,­,, -�i, ,��' :� . ­ � I , � 1� � i I I , :!...t "o - N I I� �l �._­ - . I - �� - I �, �� I I, " 70 I'll' I I I � � 11 � , � I �y I, ��4i . I I ,z I _jp__._ _ ____ ._ �� . . � � _� .- I �_ I I— � , 6-,u 2,;." -6v 2,-,�-� '1� � ­ 1� I -, -7 - i -- 41-- ­_ -, I - I i ­ : ,I,,r loo I .11 I ,I 11-- I ,V ,l,7" _,�, , � : I I I.-I I i I ,� ; . � I ­ � _�l 1� 1.I I I � . I � . I LL; �,.� :,­ I V� I . I I - : I I ��.', ­1 I, . I � ... I t I '11, I, I---—_--- t I i � �l � I . �I I ­.__- I I I ��` I - r �- 1 . �.; - I . 1 ­4 ! t, I , Z�" I I :1 . :: " �,� I -- ,:4 1 11 �, I 11 I � I -..! ;�! - - , I I " I , I I . �, I— � ­ �l I I I . ! � ," - '-- , - � . ,�,�, - . I � , !� 1, I I rr ; - - I ­ i I 7' � 1, _� t - , I 1� � I I I I A- � "I , "Z I I I ,,, ,.- . ! I � _Il : I � � ,:�`I:�_".,_" "I_� ,:�1 � - . I .! �1� � I 1, , 1,��_'_� - I ,. I" . _� � I ,,� : '�, i � ,1� __ ",, � �',��bl'_ 11 I i�� ;,i� _ 11 � � - �1. " 1 133 1 1 , : I ,�" �� , I �j "IQ _I ,­ - i I ' 'I �. , i " � / ll,�" !Pl 125 ;w � � �','­ I I � I . , , "� .4 S - i I , e __�_�l ,,�;_:i- . , ,,If,"z", , 1, .�L,, ,i,4 i N ,� 11 , ____ 7 � I 1� . 11 1, - I.. I ,--- i I ��,�l , I ; I � , , � ; �� -I ,,,.�,�,',- I/ , : I It %,� I i � �Nllll I � I- � / : I 4, I "I I . � �l I � 1, . �__l I- . �l ---___� I I -1 I I ' ' - " I I ! � �- -6 , , � I I : , I I . ­ ­ I _­� 1! - . . Vi , flogur &MOL .....!!! � i ,�I_- - -- -- '-� ,,,',I,' ; - L,qT k "k P_Y.I�Tl 96 4. IAAlmgqT 6IM — I � N", "gr 4',"(, ' ,�,,��,6� . i* I I I � � _�­ l , ll�­� . I I \ . . I ,� �. : I . , I "' , " , f 1* I I 1\ I— -_ _� -- 11 4- ­-,'_;._, i %�, , .. � �. I I I 1�� _ ,I---- ----------7_:�1 1 �:, ; I I ��_� � " ", � . �_ i`_, �1' � ') , 1 � ____ � I � 1 1 1 � , , , I � �� \,!� , � �1:i"" ,,,,, ­7r,t , 11 y --- -- - � t , ), �� �� _, -; ,I le,7 Undeft, , � - � ��',�,,� ­�-.,__-", I , I I I ,�-.,� � I :� : , - . ��,,�,,'� ",,, , I I 'i " I i" I , I , , ,_�' ""' � , I , �l � ,. I , �l It , ,1,�, 'A , - I r ,11�1,�I , I I ­/ :, � - - "'- I . � _� -, I I ,,, I ! .", i, I , I , "' - - I , � I / 1. 11 , "A", -�',: 1 � � I -1 - � � ,�� '',"I", 4:*.)� - - , , .1_�_ /� "ltllt I o��"-,-.,vr, ,,,"?'­� ,,-�,; .'ng, Vo e. I r I / -1 !j r A ll� 114 - �,�,z;_�, I - _ ",�"_ _, , I I I I I- I I I . ­__ll'Pl,_: ". :, - ,,I ,- `­ . I "I'll " I ! , , " O I ­1 ��', 11, � ., I .. I __ 1 1, S � 11 � ! 1. I --- I ," t I � I At " , ��r � i � I I "' ­ I I-''�r_, "b : _." ! " - I , � _ - I � I - I '­ 11 1!� 11; W., i� , . I - 11 ��, , I , : _ : ­ i . " I , , I ,,�-�,- ��,�x I I -.111 , � i It� � __ _1 - ,­� � i �I, . ol .___ I �I " ­;,�, ­ - , � � "��s ,,, " I I i I. 4?v �-1 1� I ,� -,1, I ,I ', ", , �% , " � "_ �� , ,x____- 11� � I li - _______\ I W" " 1, � , �,�� 11 . I �­,,�.�,�, I "__ ll�, 11 , , I , " I ,� ''I � �W :�� " i , . ---� ` --- - t, -----­- � I \'113 ftposep vvoja�-r 61 ve -, "A li ��,," I I �- 51110""'I"11,111", " 1, , ./ 1�'' , L, "'i" � llt,�� , I I � ,7 , _1 M I , " , ,,, , I " 'I" 'I �, N 11 � �, ,"" �,- " , I I - " I � I I �� I L, - " S� ­1 I ,, 1�,I I I / 20 � �, _ I ; I - ., . 1 4 � , - I .;­_I"�� ,- ","_���', 11, I I 11 � � , 'I-, - / I I 11" � : , _. I I � ... , �, : , �l � � / I � , I 1 . ;7r . I � I ,I .,, 1,- / / i ; �117 I I: , I I - , ,� I I I ,:-- I ­11 - � �� I I .1 , 11 I 1:­ z �� J�� - � 11 I . � � " r I . , -` I I -,']�,, ',� Lf ,- "C".ioo� , , _� .1 , � 11, ," , � / I , I � I." I 11 Ili! , " 'L v, !?4)v , ," ��,, "I �*1 - i I i� � - , ,_� , � . ILI ; . I , -- I ; I . z, � I - 7 ­ _ : I 1'1��,�_� 11 I I 11 , "��,6�', r I , - I I I ,� . 4, , "I­­': '� /�� __l X / I , , ; - I rl I , '', � , I I � 6""; 11 I : , , "", - , I r I I " . � " I , I , I I � - � � 11 I � I 11 , , �� � I . I - . I " . , � ! -­,-� ! - " , � I I ,,, I / � � 40 , I I 11 - I 11 I � , ,, , � "�, , , I �_ _ , � I - i " �i,� , I I ! �,, : . I'll ,� I ., � � I` . ­ � �� __ . _11111 , -, � , � -, / : / I ­� �1 ­ i , "\ ,� I"': � -,­ 't , ,, , . "I� I 1. I - '4 , ,� ­ �� � � i'�l ,,, I - � " � I I ,/ 0 I , ,,,, : I - . � I t , - ;� / , ,",��, ; * I I � � ". . ���,,, , I � I I , li "" 1 30 Z /// I I ,� . ! /14? , " I �­ � � * � I -1 _ "" '_ , ,� ,� 1, - I I I _­ I ,l � I 11, ­ �11 - I � I " , -, :_� I , ,��, --- I ,�',� �,., I 11 � I I I 11 . � _1 " '': � X / . � , i � � �.,�ll I - t, 0 EF%41'7rlM6i I I -, I I . - , �ll ll� I "I \ / � " I I i t e, ­ �1� - 1 11 "Z�-, I C.,I DEWAL*a , �,�,,��,:,�,�,"', ,. ". � � : , , I . I ; - , - - ''I !""I"", ; , -11, r. I \ '. . " 11 V , � -, - � i)�.�',"I I I I ' 'I 107"*0 I , I I . R7 � I , ,x - �_l � I I Ar .A'4�el O�JWPO$M- - _ I I ; � �,,, I "I 0 , � i�,- , [ 1151, . I - 1, I 1 -- - - \ I 1-11 , ! _� 1 4 ", 1� , I I I .I � I I I I ' *ad , - -_ , I , I � -.","I- � � "'�,6, I I , ", 7 1�111 I ol &J,,aaw ,roo I I & I / __+______ ! 31 I 77� a7----,- ------ : xl I I / % . � la q , �?'111' . 70 i - I 1 I � ,, i ''�,,,�,.,,��,�,:" .11. I - , I C, \ I,�' \\1 1� , .- __�T . 11 , � I , 4 . \ , I �, jv�I.� 't ,& , , ,� I �l ol _/W 1* ,It , ,#V;, , I � � . �I I i .� � It�l I ,;, " ',,,/*,o.,te! 39ovey'-ii i!�, I 4 ,'!,' , _', ,�­. � - I 1, I -, I -_ I I I I � I � �il i - I - I � � I I 1�­ I I I � _� ,: � I I 1, � . _43 11 - . -. I I - . I � � 1� 11 I . 1 4 ! I -\,O I I � I , " �.. - I I I , i � I � I . 1 �7 ",ll�'." � ,,�,I_' ,��,*_10, .�7, � - 1 . .I I I I � -I - I . � ,', I 1 �,­,: \\ / , I I I , I I I I',-I I i - 11 r �'_ .%�l " ��, ll�,"I I` ,1 I I I I I I,­ \ / . , i �3 i I - .1 I . I I 11 � _� I ,I I"' - "' �'r I 11 . I I - � - 11 I I \ , \ I� lk� z, , I ­ �l ., 1,� I I I i ­ "­("2"�Jea ,4oq,ys�, � .�162 - 1% r, I 11 , / ! i . � " i �... I , 11 I I I � - ,\( I f; I - I I , ,��"" , i ",,,,,� - I -. . � '1� , I I I I "I �1­1__ _"� / / � I ." t_ 4�, - * ! ; 311'�l , ,� ­�M_,/7', Ago -,--,?g -� I I __ . ) I. I I : �,� ,� : - I I I t_,.", " . �', � �l , � ;�r � \ I,, . I �, , I I I i "I �� �_ /,S", o � : �� �, - � � ­ 80 � � - �I - - i � '' 'L � � I , I ."Z, , -1: I � -, ­.I� .- . I I I 11 I I / ; " ,,, ,�r 99 ',�,��;__" � 1;. ­ I ''. - ! I - � :,"�,,, � � - , � i ! � �I i " 1, I�l - I \- I I- I : I I -I I I� � , ; 7"� 1 . -.- (.,�, lllo 1�'t . ,T�G�_ i � 01" . I ,� � I I- I ­ I i I I , I .1 1, - __ I . - I. ill - I ,_I_,;- I 1 I i , �,_,''� �'l I - . I "I t . -\ ii ,:�­- , ! ", ­ I., I � . . I I I - - �� I ; I L . - - \ ,1, , . , , 1� . � I � 1.I � '' , I ,� L- I " � i 11 _.��-- I I ,- - �.� 11 -�', I . - . . I -_"._­�­ ___,____r_ -_ _�_ % , : - � ______� - __ ___ I i- 11 �! " I - � j ! - �.,­ �, ;�_I � I - ;���,�', � "� / I _ - , I , W"� 7 �, ­­ -� I- - , I I I I �iit"` I . I"',— r: I - "" , , of (. , "I - � , � I �� � I � I . ,�l - - l_,T, 11 I I I I — �,,_- ,�I - , I I I I : 34 1, �`l I __- � 1: : � I I - , I ­ I.- ,� .,�, � � -I ="�� \ I, ., 1_�,Z­� - — / . i I I " I I I I . � � '' I 1, - , I . x ," 1, , ­`­ - 17 I : I I I � �, 0 �,,,-J,�I,,,� -.741 11�l , '' � 11 . -, � I __� : , 1. . -, � ,,, - .1, I� I , . � I., � , " 1� I .- �-­ %� ­ � " . . I � . : -. . � r ,,, , � I . -, I �. -1 - .,,1��'cr. � - c; ?**. ", � I . -4 . � i ," � I I'll ­­- 11 I I I � I I - � ���'�, � ,� ,��1, ,� - -1 "' - � . I ,, ;'�,�<""�,q� ,�' - I- 1�' �" I. I� - �,;_ 11 �� I 11 .- . . , ,�� . 1, . I ­ I I - ---------- ---- i ______--__ __-:� Eli, � - , ", "j,� ," 11 , .. , __Xt - - ,� -I.�".: ,­­I I .�,,"' � , I - t� _! .5 , � � _. ! - I -_ "... 't , ,z ! - -­_ " I , , ­ " I 1� r I i , �s i : � 1:�]� _4- ,000�, �� � '�"*� ___ ___.­_.____._._.___._ \ -1. ­ I � ��­,; �� ,";j/, , A5,�1.'O�'�,,"re I""i I ,,,,,, � ,�, - I ", \ ., � , , 6" _�,_�,, "�* * I/ I , �* ,:,,�,�,�,, "" � IF. � � 1-_::�_'L ­ - " I . / ,�, i I "I , I -, ( ­1 1.� L< ` - , - 4�_l I ,._t�l � - " , ., , " I 'A � i � i �1, ;a,ra '610,,�,(v +", �-, I I I ,�/_� - , , , ; , i "T I mal I I 'L ...- __ I ,�., i � . — _ "" �,", I � . , 1, , I - - '. 11% ! t4 i I ;,.,-- z., , I -_ I �� I I- � I � I � ­,',.,­_l__, ­ —-,­� � I ..,,�4�'I-i'��,.,,,� , . _:�� �': ,41 I , '11, , � 6 1 1 1'._,�. I ; , , _j.,r ""� Y'l"_ �1,q . �, ,3� _�_._­ . I � , , _7.,)"f'f,to� _ I f �! . ,a" i I , � I �� - ,,, , �0�, I . ­ i� I i�f , I �� i,; '.a- , , 'W', I 11 � - , � I ".1.1.1maliMilimil" iw�i r 1;;T.,�_,�_§ 61"'t ________ _­ ­�,I__­ - -1 -1 ­ __ - 1 - ,4� �ll....._.--� I �� -1 I law, ,� 1-In ­ I ,',- I .�".. - � I ' 7 1 - I'll i I _.�. ... ll..1.117�1_1 11 - I ­ �i��I ;1� tl�', �'.l, . I I, -_ 11 � ----- ­� ­1.7wl­T­ � --- 11 ,�," --� - ­­RNT..`P� I "I , 1, I I- N � ' ' "T So -.,�_;,1_11�'l . � Q: I " , - ­mIr"7 ' - I � I I I ,_ , '� ! " '��' , � � ,,,, � ­�g___- rMT51' I , , , , . el. ,,, , � I I li�,.­.­ 11 i 7" I 1 . I 1, ',� 't''�11 t , ­ 1­1 i 7 - I 7W 1"11�_Pl�' I �- I ��, , � � , \ � � � I'll I ­ , Lr��I,' " I '\ � -7 Adw 11 11 11 `� � , I -�',�, I I I -� � 0-411bes , � ��t �t� . � , i I I , i I , li 4 ! ,w4es , � 1.1" ­ ,%�' I i � � 1:? " A, 11 I I I .� `A I , t I I 80, I ��." . . I-�. ! I , , 4 ­�i:_ I "V, _-, � �' .1 � � , � V - - 7 I ; I � i ,� " Ill .I�7 .',111,�,��,F­ ---I-- __�__ _� , : ; ; I , I , 1� I � \ , ill' I � -_ ; � i : . I 11 I . , , I I . �,v -,� - ­­ I ,� I 1 �� �I � � 1� 11 -_ "- I I - I I I T�' - I � � . - , . T I ! r ,�., ,111 -11 11 __ "'1� A141 - � i , -� 1,I _,� � � ; . I � , I I _,� "I I - I �i. \. I : w", "'� I I- i ��, , .1 � I I I - I , � , - � , .,�, I _`, - I - � " , ,_"�wY,,�, , ,, I I � � i , , , , k I 11 I � I , I 1.,,, I . 1, : � , -, , ­1 � � _1 I I I i - I , � 11 -A . I , " - � , I I I I �­" ,I ­ '' I 1� I I ", I � , � , I I I'I, �1� I I , "I , , I I I I., I � ! I I ­ .., - ! - 't 7 I , .�l",I` 1��, - , I - I I i ,"� - � 11 ,�, � - "I - . I i � ��� �_ � I i i , .6 1, 4- �-.,'�,r il" I I I - I I I ,�' I I , , - � I I , - I 1, 1, ��., - ­r 7 � , - � . - �&! I .e A �l I , � 11 - , 11 I I `� : I ,"' il � I ! i I 11 - -,_'__ I-, 1_� "1,` . , - � 1, I " �� ", � 11 i ! ,". ,-111, I I -_ , , ,�I`., � � � I 1 1 ! 11 . .1 ,-,� I I �� X . � I '�_!, I !,�!� I I I I�4 I I - i I :, - I r . f4^, , ," �kl C I I I " ", . - � I -�I: I � "I . I i ! I i i _�: , - -I-- ,�-. - ''I I f , -4� � \ I t� . .��, �,l " -,_.:-1� - _'l��, � -,,I i I i'll,t' � \ , I I I 11/1 ­ i � I .� I , , , I I I - _ __ I I -1 ­ I , 1�1_ ��,�'i , " I ,-, : ; i I V-I ,I - 0 ­ I , ,�,�� - 11 _�,: - _______ -- -_ "" t"'z I� �_ � I I . i i I I I �lrl, -, ,:, I�L_l-0 -A li 1� - ___ � - - ­"I �"'r _11,� :�11 �I ­,". , �� I , i "' I I ­I �'� ,� _ , , , ., i � , _­ - � � . - I', i ...... , ,�, - ,� -­1 I It" IN� , : . , %-, r_ .1 i�l .__ _- - 1p ,'7�,�,'�p�'I ��e,7'It,.,% - 1, , ,��� I I ,, , 'I , -, i,L�_ , -'44 . I I I , I - I ­ , _z , , I "I \ ,; - I -�, _,;�';"", , � I-2, I i \, TM, , I ,'W 1 , I I I . I I ," , I � , 'j, �l - - r , , ��,,,t�T , I � ! j; , , , ': 1. ! � .1 - I so - ­ � I ,�I -11 ,-, �4,� -10 �� - �I ! I ­ ! i � I t , i I I � 1,, ��l :�L� � I ! I .-, I , I 1-1��I, , � ,4::k I � . I I 1, 11 I ! : I ,� !F./�"- ', i I � I ,� I , I rll;�.5 I I . ;. - ,11 � .�", - : ; I I lit ' 'I - I - _ I;, - , I I 11 I -I I \ ! I I i I ! ,: � . . ,�, , - . D � �_00 i I : � ,'_ � I D E-5;F,q T STAR 6L.V �� -, I 11 I"I -:r- \ , � I . I I - . _ I I I� I : I I I 11 I . , 'r ,,,,��iz�I�­- � 1 . \ -- -_ --.%.--____L-____11dl I I n��,, ,� " ,,�� �, I i : I . I I I 1, " � � I — ", ,.. I I -� 1. .. ., -If',�� ,"'� , . , � . ,�, - -11 1, � , , " ;'�� �i �q. ", . I . i, - I , ,,,%� � ­ __ ,%%,�, .�� ­­ -'r,��, � ,,,,,, � It \ - , � I iii'll" �.� wl, . � �� I - - I- _,� ­� r i . IR 1�1, 1 4, � '­.1 I � � \ , I , I ,�� _�t I I 1, " - , I . . � - - 6 & �� . 1 .. __ --- ,�­,." � �,Akl , - �l � , , "I , I --tl-- i . .� . �, I I -.j 11 I " I 11 1.�­ I I, 11 ___,� I - , I I : k�i . --- �: I " � . �: \ � I . 1� . I ;l � �, t , , '� '. _ ­ -1 __ 11 I . ___ ,�,1,t '11��,,� I i � \ _. I �I I �. I ," �11 $ ____ I 11t_ I­,!" �7 . \ :1 - ,,I'. I � -_- ! ,�� � "I ­ ,,,:� � I � 11 , � � � , �" "!,­�_�k�_,� , . - � �­ � I—- i 0 1 1 I—_ I / I i i - - I ,� - 1;_ , 1� . , -,If,, ; �i;,,� , " � --- I � ____, �� I I � " � " li I , __ I - .,� 11 , � �"�, -, � -K-T .1 , , , \ , - _____-_-_ ­ I -__�-_ j " - � lk I - , , � - ,I -I ­,'I � I 11-1 - ! - I --�l -��--, 11 'N ­"'� , I / \ I --- -_�_. , ,_" I � I I � "I'll --:',��,,,, 0 1 - � � I � I 111, �l " ­ � ,� 11 I I I � -_ . I- - I " �11, �.1-1 I I 4 51r4lelol 1, . . -11 ! .: ! � ,�:, -- I , I ____ -,------ I ,� - I I �;, ,�g, , : I _____ � �. I I I 11 '� -1 I ,�ill II , - � I _, i *0 v I . ,�" t ! , , ��, � . - c w � -- �, _4 __4 �- . ,. : I - 'kw. -�� ­ ill I I . I rrrr � -1 ­ _11", I I_ -____ I -. I I ,�/ I � , . : , C�� ! ,��--`�,�� ,,i At--4§,11��,___ , ,,� I I ,, 'r " " 56 t1l , ----__ "A' � �A : I i � . I I . 11 _� _,�, I � I � �l - ­1 W- , �, , I , - —) ! ! ­ ­ " ,�, 1.1�_'l .1 , , I / :� 777'IF'-,-- I I _ 1,­­ I I . , t - �,, ,", � , � \ I �_. "I"—----- 777 - 1-111, f.150-_____l', ", ,5 � )� I -_ " � ."', �" I I OfIl � " I," ,� I I go i - _. %,� . 11 I ', -, — I .I- ,, ,�1_1 ��,�� ,: I , ',,-,�,._�:,A, , 40 I ­ ­ I � ��l� - I P,Oiff.-Wo �lj/!',,/& - � i I ;l 11 611, ! I, ll�, ,� -- � , _ ".", , 11 I "�, � ; - /�l I __ , I � t � " , " :: , 11 � I , ,: , ': ­, le I � - I 11 � i4l " ,,, ,: ��, � .,;Il,:,,4"�,,�", " , �,_�,� ­ No�, 'li�4 " I�_l I �",� ,I I � :-* I F I I,- I I � il; I _ - � - ,. �' 'i �? � - I ;C(*Mtl#r ,' .�evic,76,cr - 11 .1....�� :.11 141,� 1 :: ��,,,� ­ I -, �,_,�, I I � , \ - \ " , . - -��r, . I - I I ��'��­� � ::-�kt:", 1�� I - � .( .6 , 7� .;_�_ __ I -" I, I I t - I ,V,-, . -1 , , -_ � , � /Zo I I , I 11 _��. , I I , � -14 IF � ,�__ ",�'.�,, ,,- I f I _1 I ,1,�,, , I I . 11 ,'_ ,�� , V-1- ---- - - - __I,�_ - ­111 I i : "I I , , ­ , , VrW ,*�,,� ,,., ,Xl, � � I I .�. I - I , . �� I "I ­ r I I . : � �­�, I , I 11 11" �l ,;i��,"-- , I : L , I ! - ", ­ '_�, ll ,��, , k ,�'��'IiI,`�,­, ,� I ,� ",� ­ \ I 110 I ;".,& �31'7g,?,� : : � I I " �. �,TN-�. I 11, I _ � I , : ,It ��'.- I � I ,, , L , . : 11 11 ��,� -T_�­ �,I,�111 ---1 I- � , , ­11 I,��,',­j"" k ! Ill; , ,,� � Vlk - , N I 11 I " ,I � - , ; I � �,�,��_,,, ICE . - ,�-,,, � ""', " , ,_ ,, I _" , , : I_�* �­��,��'l -1 ,,� I r�' - �_11," � - "'�, " " I I 1�41 ,,, I " -1 � I �, 11 � �z, 1, � 11, ���11­ " � � ; II � : �, 0 1�- . I ----_1 - oi eo ; 11.11 . i t I I "I I �- I , , �;�,, " ,A ,:��t, I , � I . �__� It �", "'A ',�', , \ - , ""'' ,� I I " I I w� I i �, -It- I 011 7 1 1 : - 1�1!_3 , 1 ":, "� ", ' '. , " , I*� ­1-1 ­ I . ,_ L , -,',- 5', , I I 0 , , " , , . �,��"' �. I, I � "'' . I I � - \ \ I 1. I I �l�1��i,i;�,_��,N".- I .t ea I - : j. - I "­ . -11 - L, . I �, I 11 W-1 � 3r� - � � I I\ , I- .­I � I / , 11 I � : I . I , , -11, , , I � , - , i I RX-1 I " -, , I � - �­; I I I . 1 :A, . , 1, I , I 11,111 I I I , ", \ , -_ I I , I . I" , _ I . ­, \ / : 1 '3 i � I ,., I r ­� I \, � 1, ! I I , ,l -11 11 , - ,_ � I I �� ,_ I - i� � , I I I . � I _ -- ,I'' I Cl , .1,I, I� ." �, 1,�­ I \ - �_ I?; op " & I I � ,._i -I . �, 1� i � I�,-, . I -_ I -I ' ' ,---- I I I i w I _��_ : , �,:�;......r� I � I I ___ ", 1­ ,,,�',�, - I - I �111.� I I ,� I I- I I � 1�� � ll�,4, lx � I .i --------- I IP I :1 I'� _�� I "I - � I I (:� 1 i I �11_ . I I - , 1, 11 4�1:1�7­1 ­_. � I i I I 1. � I -"'.- I I � . , \ ! k I ,I* � "�­ � ! 11 �1� , ­�- I I .'I- ­ 1 __ . . _( I , t., - - �,A k�.l " ( � At', 11 -1 I- . I I i " ,::-, 1�� I I� I �I 1 .% ; 10 "t , ; 1 , ,� - , - I - 1�� " -I : I _� \ 12 1 i*' , _jj�,'_ � " I", i � I I I �I", X,. I�"I �li d, I � : �m - I __ , ", �, �� \1 � i " , 1,I., , i 40 I a- � Yl_ ll- � � A I - I ,� V� � - i � "I - i % -� I I I _111 - 1�1111 11 I _. ., � 1* 11 � I -, 11 , I I r ,� . I , I �;�'_l I I I k I , I ��,� -1 , �l �l ''A 11 � � I � � . - "'I". I 1 ()c I I , ­tp� X �� I . __�'I -- , � ,_O , �_P' , �, ", ""'1,­\ - 61 , r_l �...1 170 - - __ . , .� _ - -11 I , - I � , , - �- ,�� � .; , I,1_1_1 --- ,�_" �, ", ,.' ' I " ��7, 1 1 I � .11 ­1 , , , -t - . . - - , I 11 - i I , ", �!",�r , - ., ', , - I'' � . I I -1 1�..," _;� I. I 11 , -I—,� "'I".r � -, , / r- , , ll� __ I r %� ", I �Q � I I , ,, .� ',��. 11 ,I 4_�, � , , , , 1 , � I , , I I � 1 � I _ � . - "X3 I i ��, X, � . ,I" - _,� I .I ��, , ! 1 , � ," A, � .1 � I M I Ov I , , , � , . 0 , ,, � "` -I '�._ / . to - 4j 1 1� - I I . �l 0 i I , I ­ � i., -, , "'. � t� 11 A I � . I I I 41 - � -,, I ", .1� 11 -_ I �11 I ,!.� , I I 10 ­ ------- .1 I I - ,- I I I ;�� ", - r '. I ; 1.11 _­-____j ____L_ ", � . I I I 1 12 1 i I . . I � I � I 11 . I � I :;z I � . I " . ; I � , ­ ­� � 11 ................��� � I . �! �- - I I I i \ \ . I � 46 It 4�� �al I lllv �l IZZ) " I - : , \ �, �_l _1� � ­ : O&W _��_ :: ." � ­, � . .3 I . �'c )e. : . . - ; � �_lt , � 1,,, I I�' ,, , - � ,', " I ,� 1, I I "'. t6" , , ," I 'll ­, I I ,,�' �_ I , . I I : , , , , , - ,-, 1� : " ;l , 1. I I I I " , I i�' 11 ,_ - � " �._"', �o .il, \ , ,�,� ! ). , , I - I 1_. , 11 �. I 4;_2t,�, I I I "I I . ,� I "-. � L � I . I ... I � -, I : lj 11 , I _ . 1� � I , _ I , \ `� �l I i,/ I , 11 . . : A - , . �, 1. . "I I� ; .- I �*'lll" I � \ I , I 1 ,� �� I l 66 \\ �-lil"t - - -1 I zs`��`,_"' , . I . I ;� 1�1 I I I Z� I � ;l 11 � 6 1 1 1 - I I _%ll I 1, '' �.-, � � % �l 1 1 lll,"� I I . 11 1� . __----- ��,." ,Nj - I . � I-1 I , ��,� �� I I , .1� V - ��___ ; 1,'�l tA_ ,1 480* 1 1 i I I ,: . , I I , -0 I-_ _­ 11 � _V,"_+�,g. ,� I 11 �, ��' _�_� I I '.� . 7 _� ' 15 1 ... I ,,�_,:' , _ ,I � '41 1 ­ - I �. - - _ -74 11 _ ,,,,ilk- "i�,'. t; I i . �I - ; � ' , ­1 '�'- - ' � _ I - I \ - ,� M �I ,,,�­, I I 11 1. , ,��.� I o I I - ,,� � I I � " ,� �4, - �l J% 7-��- - - I �1_1 -, 1, ""- -_ - I 1�*� i I �l I , - ­ I I � _� ' - 150 � � I" _N� I I- - ____-— � - Jj .&- Jill M . " � "X- 11 I I I , j.,.r_ ��11 11 ,r,.& ,,­ 111.1 � .: � ,�� 1� I CK.) 11 . � -1 I I ud, . _idjj, �,��� "�_ � � I I I - � � I ,- .&� I I �_�, � . I � � ,�- "I, .1 . I 11 I I � -� � ­ I .1 , I . - ­ I . !� I ,- " _t i" — , 00"'�171�,—, --­� ,`7 ;'�­ ff� lwWwm—, --­,T-m"F" � _V, i 'i� '. ll� �1,,, ,�t I �I � I �. I 1,1_1,� �l _. 1..'.,I� . . I-;I" . ­ . ­ , 190"M '" ., . , � ,_ � �':�� 1, . - � �'I' � , ; � tlg�lr,A't�llj . �� ,_ 11 I " ! I I'll I -... �. � __ I � I " , "'�,-4 -I I I I � 1. I ig "I -,I I � I _�: ��"ir-, .,,- , ""'� "I 11,��'­ I ... " �4 14i �V! , -TIT . . I �1 4 ; I 1: " �" 1�,� � I I � "I 1. I I I : T,­ll I -1, I . I - � 7� , th , '. ­.1111— ! I I I � : � r I , - . �:; � I .. , . . I'll I I , 11 - � I 11 , , I " I , I � �.� 1 U � I I I - 11 *%,4* �k , 'I "A _�', )", ; I I I 10\ " I lz I It t, �1, I q ; I i ll��5 � . I 'jimm1w _ , . , , 11 , " I I I I . '1� - , t j :.", �',- %I ,_ i I I - %1�,,-"j," I I �­ I — I 1� I I _ 4� _­-- -- ­ .-,- - -- I � I �1, I �:I'� __ I � I ; I 11 . �� I` ,­ - I � r I �_; I � I � i ­ " I ,/ "_�- I . , ) L�Wlv — 1­ I - ­­', i I � _ . 11 , -- ­-, , , I � � : , 1VIo ,� ma - &.11 i I 11 I 1, "':,"- I I I - , , ­� 11 � 1� �,r -_ - i I '. :", .� I � ,�: �h�;,#' : � . t ,,_­ - I " ­ 10,11111, ­t�­.." ,;, � I . I ­', , i 1�-, I � i 11 � �l - I I , , � - I 11, , � "I I ,-Iv ,'I `ji� 'J, � , �il' I I � "', I - , � It � � i �_ � �, � ," __ .1-, 0 ,I �,� I_ , �l " I : � -- 111, -�, : i � I _14_� ­ _____ m I , , -_� I ,4,� ! I : I I � "- 11 I �, , , ii 1.7 _11 rimmFl," � I � . � I '14� � 11 �",,­ e i I � � I�,� 1 777�.,� . , , � . _ 'r I -` 11 �' P� I -., i I 11 I . � , ': T , ; . � ... �;",�� , lll� �7� - , , ,�; - - - I . I - r ­ � , , , ,,, . -. ,''.t I.. , I -1 ­�� ".� - ,_�, , ', - - "'.1', I-"', � � ',',­�:� I I ,� I ,. � i � -­ � I I ! , � 'j, I � , ,,,,,�, _'' ­ - _ � : .!-- , 1­ 1, , . i - -1 i z,�;,.,, "I I I � , -1 � , .-,,�, 1! .. 1 ' 1 , , - I I - ,�_ r I , 11 I ;p i, 4 . ,,,,, 1, � ,,, i � k ��,il ,_,_ , -, � � I '��_' I I I 11��' ?_�,� " I '�,-,�-,',-!��, .:, �1 ,,� ",� , , __I. ,,, , I I . ,� � 2 1 , .3 , , " ­', - ,_­ 2 11 I i r I I," � - I I � -,�.j­'. , I ,. I - - . , '­ , ,,� I 1,_11_�ll � I I_IX , I i I 11 illl�i,,,­-i, ,;��kq, �i-4 ", ',� 11 . , I _', 4/* ) ` 1'� 1� ­� I , ,� I � NA I I- '' "''" I 5eivlaif � I I ,� ", _ ,�� "If I � -1 �­" :�" i * �, I ", ! 11 I � jl�A­I ; ­ � , " ­ % "., ( grgrmad v h4 I I . A I � � ;, I I ""', : . I ,-,- I . _. I . I � - . I t ��, ll�_ -57 � ��,,� I I ., .. .:;D : .,� W i , � 1. I I I � 1, �: I - 4 . . . .;�I � ; i ­�l �:�p5� � I :`*','-.' ,�,�, !� �111, , � . I t.. . - "',�, �II - , I �, , ,, � I , ; I ,� I - , '�I' I I ��, � � `� - 1 _- ,��_45,i -2 77 " 7, �_,' . � �. � , I I . , 3- ! I � ,� i'�1',�, � C� �''�-�,V`,�­ ��:';�, , .. - I _ !" I _,.; ;,�k_ f , ,,- �:� � — I I 1, � ! : -11 - � I . — , I - ­ . - -11 I I ,A , " - . . 1A , ,'�I,%��....... _,,,,`� �,�,, -",:":, 11 I I 7, � l : 115;k/ I S / I I '" -�,,­';,� - ''I ��� ,,"$-,,i�_4,�w` I" " � T,ll� �11;1�I I " ,, I �_, ,� ,� 1�llmv er,llol-, ,6 1 1 ,, ,i��` ' "I"'ll'-, __ _'� -- .", -,,, , - I - i ­ \ � ! "I I "I 'I" � . � , , ' - I" 1: - �i,::�:, ,�kr­',I 11 ,,,, , I I , .- _t��'��""z� � , I ,�__ : I t 11 " ; ', '?� � ,��­ r,­-,7'e -1- ," ,-, 1�1 �'� � . , �',ft "��p 1"`Z � -i'r."" I I .%� I I , : 1­11�1,­ll I I , I,, " 11 , _ " Iz � : �'lll I � � , , - I - . - i ; - I - ,_��, � _1 " � ,$ - " , -4 - ,:,:�� iy ,, v W, I �-- , � ti i , ! I I . � , � ., ��,�."41""�,--,��l*,�'ll�.,-, I ,�� � ��,i �, ,�, �%, � �� I., I - .- �i , I I . I 1�_ � I zw. , I � I I I - -_ � 1, I 11 ,I,- I I I , ";,,,,,, I,-­,""", I 14 � 1, � - �, ,.��.,I I I so I I %� ,�� 1pl� I I � I - .`�lll 1, I I l­ ,I � ­:� . , � - I iz � I I � 'ilk I ,� , ;,,,, ,� 1_10._ I L , - �. I I I . � _�l l­ � I � ,� � I J��'�� -, -_ -, ­ - I------t ---- —� — --I---- --- -F- --_ - --- I', , I "' I ��, 'i" ,,,,�`,ik,'-,' 14 , , , . , I ,­: I I - - ''I 11 1 1 1 1 - , _r , _ 1,_,11�_ I - :_ - , � " _,� I I I �, , I 4-11 I : I : i . I I � i ,� , - ��"-, , "t, . � , , , ! � " 1: � ,4,� ,,,� I V_ I I I . I '�'il � - - "I ;, �. ? ,­,,_,p ,�,,z;A-W­-`_ '10,t-., , ,': ", 1 - '! , , ,ii, �­, �� i I I '��l - I I � I I I _,,,�:,,, 1, .1 I ��,",`, , ' ':i" i'-v .- . � - .- ,_, I . � - I I - �� ", ,,, 11 � I I -� � 11 �­ , I - '� �.,� , ` "U'll 1,t _ C_ i "I - I I � � _ r, �, ;,,�l,,, - , , I I I I � , -, � I , � . 3 I .1 ­ I I 11 " � , , . 1� � � I � � 1� , ­ - �4; � : : �� I �l � . I I lle��, 4 �� 11 � I 1� : I , ., i , I � ;I.44� ­ � ! � - . i - - . I I � 'I,' 1;�_ 11", 1 -4 ,�, I t 'It li! - 11 � , , `�� I- ,, �I,,,!,� ,, - I �l . �,',�­ . ,;.*."- ,;',�.�I I i . ; ; -, ! 1: ,�2,� .1, �, �", �11 i � ,�­,". "" _­ �l I 11 1, I - I , - � . -. I � -f I 'll i I i �`-, 1� ,11, 11 '. , 1�1­11_ii. ­�_ ­ " - ,� �, , - �,, ; .'I" '... . � �. __ - - . , �, , .`,*,.-- �l I ,.- :! I , I . 11". , �,_�, " ­� .t - - - ._ : .ja 2� .. .1-1 !�.. I I .., I I I�_ �._�, I , I I - I ­ :1 I � _"',`,�:`�� .1 .1 � "" ,�� -. ��� I I I ,-.. :1011� �. I : ,`C� '�_­,��,i�_ o�,1, , , ,�,�e�_ � , , " ,11 .-�,; ,i . 1* , : ..,t ,_ i :, I ,_ I - . i: : r i I � .4r , - - , , ,� , 4 11 - _lli� - ­ ,4 �_ :��, I I � 1 1.1� "I I. . � I I I I I I ", . � , ­ , "I I I � � I I � -_ " - , ` I� I,r I I -, " : - �, , " ,` � �1' " �- - ; I I/ " I - I ll_� ,� , "' ,,-III, " . � ',�,, � : � --il , I ""I 1-4 � ", �,._ - . � i ,�,,� I "I , ,,,,"'l "-- �� " � � r" : I , ' - 11.1 . , ... 1 114 � '­ I . : ,.,, --- - � ---� -- I - i I �, 11 I r,l , ­ , � I . � , .;.� - - -, � ,�, 44 1 � , ,�', '��t�., , , �.� ,1�I t I � - - , ,i: ':,-Y - �' I I ,",,�`,� I I I .I ,�"Zol-1, ,,4,1,1�,� i f � I �I ,�,,,-�� �!'� I ­ ;, - . I I . . I I �� : 1-11` " -� 1-11, . , ­, I I - I I I . �,� � I : __ � " I `;,� ,� ,�" �,��' ��-, I,—�,,.,, . � l__. , 1 ., I �,_ I-�._-,, �I I ­e�i , -"�': � I ,,, ,., I I ­ __ 14 �,i,,, - I ! I �':, � I I, ; r 17116 w",'�7,1 �� I !, I I ", �,.,�4 -.- I ­�, ,7,--�"� i , '14 1, ­L, �i : I, I tI 1�� I � I I N , ___.. ----. Ir� ,`k,� _��,,�',,,, ,��]1,�,2".1,�4 . i'l" , , I 11 . - .--,-, " ,l , , I I I"". I I" - - ___. 11 .cl�ll I " "� � "I , I I � � ,I I",�_,__ I � _�!I "11 I I, , .n -_. "I �,-�"-,,,,,, ` � lrl,Al� - _t __-_ -- --- I " ,� - 1 1 t',,, - ,, I ;�IL. �__LA_.;,�__ _1 --.,------_ _-A ,- _ ______ - � , ,. ­ , - ��, I I :i� ,- 1%A 1�4 ��,,'i ,'' 4, � I �l 1.� I I , �,,,r I,� " ­ I I , I � -1,'I'S -, ,� I t, , " I "-, ,­ _'ll "' .1 i -, -.1", � I'll, 20 zi � I �'j _�� �1. �� , , - i _11" 1� I 1� ��� I �i � I ­ �� ­ il r . ,� � 11 i _." 1� ,' �, ,,� � " - ,,�le.'I, �," I ­, � 17 -, �11 ­1--v'CL.A i-1,�,r­�� � "..� , ", �I I ­�,;C%",', �11 ,�'; I- 7�,-111,­7­-', ,: I � I 12 � I I, I.- . ",-, S.' ' I—- "I �,_ - - , 1, _,:��!,t,ll, 11, � � �l �,v ' � , �, ___7 1 � "', , I I , ­ � ,,, , I � 1 :""41­ 1 I , � I , w",_,� - � I Il, I �l — I , i gl_ � � I �, I I ��­ 1, ', I I 't, �" � 1 -, ", ­ � I I I ­ ,` �- "1_1 I I � � -11 ""l-, -M ­ 1�1 I ,, �': ��'.�"I... I _,� �, " I � �l I � I 1� �4 �. i I ,. �I - � � ItV. I��- I � . ­ , �l , 1 17 -4 ,,' I�,­� �r",��_� , \ 1, t "'! � I I 'I , I I e . ,_ , - . 1, � g, .11,;� I t,1,­ I -1 �� I 1��11_1,I_ ,_111_1'� I -, I 1, - , 17;1�;� ,��l "I I I 1� , ,,,,� I ,,, , , � . � 1, i , ,�,-,: li,21f�l,nll,l 11, I, I _� , - �,; , P lk ,5,,�, �, - 'b"', I r 111,4, ��' �111'1� . - ,7 4 , _;��ll I ," I I I �, ,4 7 1, , .2, ''�� �I I , i - �l � ,.,-, I ,�,,5 . -i-, , , . _�, �,I�1,4;.:V,, .��; R,J, _,"."l- . �l I -- � . I � 11 mk -_ z _,.� , . I �l I 11 " - I - I I - I I , , ­, ,,-, .,­_ 1­1 '-T"t:��'- -� - j I-No 0, - __ rm� , m I �.�� _' 1 4� 1 11. � _' r:, - -'w' 'r �6% � - - lil--l"'."', - � I � _,�I I ,F� �7 � -� I. I �I "Ill I __ ,� T�;_ � , ,� - """e", ,�, � ��, I r I � - . ­1 I � - -. I I - ii, �, . r � " , J, '��,4�,, , -�Tr R:� "� 11 -1 _m�'l , " �I - "I � - . ' ' I I I : I I I � :,�, V, ­7� ' ' -r I I -, - , , '' I ' '. ,,��_ ,p (-,:14Ai,N., ll� --_-_ I � ,, 'I' , � �-1 ] "Zi - ` r I,'� ,, ! I - - "I I , , �' -x"", �,,, ,, ��, - _� - "'j, , .�,,' J,�,,;�' , ,� , I I � )IRP APPR(`�'Ai_' I , ,'' ,J, -,,, ,.,,""."A *1�111 q ; - I I � I I.,k ',,�`!'�',, "�_�., " � 11 . . � ­ 1. . -­ 1-1 __ I.. - "I , ,i , I �­ . .I ( - ",� , 't",''�, ,6 e-P,", ": � ,I._�,'., il� , ,�, " I I I I I I ,--. � I , ,I 1, . ""*,�Z, � ��,- i"-� " , � 11 11 � 1, r . ­ I I - '' i, - , � I l­ 1- 1 I!, 1�, I I , ILL No . 74- 19�W , �'l I - � �' :�, - �,Li�,�­l , I I"ll, " I , �l­�ll I,X I I.1 , 1� , I - I . �1, �� � 4 r �l � ,�.� �, -l", ' ' , I , - ,�lf I'll I T,lk" - I I I ; � I I'l, � ,, , �....... ����lj�' �il�­ , ')Q"�-, P.v , It ", t� I I ' i �­,-Ak'--�___ _,"', , ,0,�,�,�', �2 , 1 :" ", I . � I 1� I I , , / ,i,� � , ,,��,, ,�...� . 'i'� .�I �1, , �"� , � - ,� , ,� � � - - - - �, ,, I � , '! " , -�,­�-4 ,� �'.� � - �� - , ,��, ,, , I� _,�."jr, _-,�'�,;k" : , �. ,�� " I I -�c�1' t - � / r s ,j_ _ I'll I . — � Tpw / ow . Ll"', "I 11" ,�� , - �I­ '14,11 Z'114, 11 , I � , 71 411 Amy /// A', . ____ I I-I­ - " I 11- I I I ll,� ­ t i - ­ I I �= I I *�': -- : , - �. . i � .- - ­ .g , I � I I � I­1 I C�41_.WFO Af , ,�,�� � - � ,�X_ �7771t�*��!'_ - - , 1. - i � - ��'� ' I 11 — : . . ­� �� I -,.�,,,��--,:--,�,�',"�, , I � IFIC R 1�_N!l�" � ,oalm &*f C41 soo I � � I I , 1- i I 11 � ,., ,, �r I �r�. " I I ­ r I -, , . � ! I, z I i .1,11 , ' ­ I'y� I o ­ . , , 1�,:44,�,,, �_ I I __ I - �. � 11 I- ,. I �,� - ,C,v�L t*;o4,1� , ,­­ I I I I I /11, I I .. I I .. ....�� , ,'L� � _.'.. - . I 11 .1 I _ _.. ., _- , , ; " _. i(P--!"*�Qf, fAl NO 1,� �,.,� I S A,f � W, A I 11 i i �_ ;'ll � . I ,:��', I � . - r-I ­. - - - ., �A"��,�1, -.,� "li""' � I "Irs.5-14i .5.�A to. 'A' . , , - � ��,::­, "r. ! Z11-7" � ` I " ENVIRONMENTAL I � r - / 6 I I . 1, . il"�i �� � �� 14-4/4f ­�e - .1 �.. �;­ : �� I � : : _17 ­1 - I_ I ��jimt 11, I ., � .;,.), I I , I I , 'T, _.'� 1� �1.17 I . 11 � � .1 I ! I ,,�, ,� ,� .t,`��, , �' A-PROYFE, 11 ; 1-1, � : I I I J I I � i . 1, � I p � � I � If 1, , , , ".. ­ .1 II % ____- ­ I I R- 1% 177 11" I 'e. , _ ___2_�___ ____ _ , ; \ ,., � " : . I I I ,i4I " ,� I I ­ 1,1 4 ,11 � :_"� . 1, I . - I� A;,�,,���* 11 1�I � I ". � �, . -1 I T , ` MMUNITY PLANNE f" � .; � 4" � ­ . I ,.; ., 1: 11, ­ �,�,?'l ­�,,-,-- ''I . i . � I : DA',[: . � , .1 ,tl,� � " ,,,, 4c "'I". R I I :, : r�i,�,,�--�,, , PR-1 � , e�,, /�, ��,!:��,�',!:'� - '. " �r � � �, , I ­1�,­­­T,_­ '� .1� 7 1 -_ . �, I I r . I� � I I I., 1. � I I - , - r , I �� , - 11 I 11 1, 11 , ­­ - " � � '�-;�� -1 I 11 , I - , ,, .., � I i I� I ­��­ll , � � ,, , �__ � � _11 `�,�a'-.��,,*�­ 111 11 , - , 11111 . -I '_­ , I-; - - I i ���:�1. 1. , � , . REVISIONS , DATE i BY '�, " � I j I I � I I - I 1,P I 1� ": , , , ��,Q , � �� ­ . �� I I ___� I I yl��_­­_ __,­ - � I I � 1 .4,"I I , 117, 1 ,; ,� ",��,'� . - I '_ -1 I- - I " ,�3 �,� , - : , , , , 1. - - - � ,, : - ­ , r so= � I- , ­ - " �,I 1, � ­1 -14 I- " I I � ­ ,- - , . I �l I ­e ' � ,�. I `­ -. - ­!�­'�.,.'_L ,,, � � 11-1 " -1, I I- - - 1, , � I "I m I i. �,,�llu, , , ­ Am ,,�� , " i,- - -_ I . '�'�,��fl "��-----"I� a& 'L -_." I '..lu�l I . : 11 I � I 11 ,� I ,, tl­j, I I 1. I I � � 11 , �_� 1. ­ I­ I � I 4 I _`_M� i - � I - -. ��'l , I I m i � '4",_ , - I . 1� �� 1� , - � � �,�,L���i�� 7­ '' I .fg,� I . ­� ­ I - - �, I � . ----.-" rl , . - - - - " ' ""L _.!��Z . �l � ".;Z, I __ i�11. I 'll � __ _ - " , , IL - = _=1111 - w., " ,�I-i�_=&Aw. , I - �� — j:�___,_a,,,Awl - .lbll' 11 . 2-M .­- 11 I I I I � � "i , - Laa ��, I ir. - . � ___ wailo- j A = mmAim*AwMim%..o�-�.,._ "W ___ =, I� k �W�__�, - � �