Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPALMA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN C/Z 85-8 1985 PRECISE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE: CHANGE PARCEL MAP VARIANCE- C.U.P. _- REFER TO' APPLICANT- LOCATION : C l --i Nf� REQUEST;. EXISTING ZONE PREPARATION PROGRESS m� DATE BY. COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT NOTICES SENT FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS. NOTIFIED BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE POLICE L C� RECREATION & PARKS ro( -- SCHOOL. DISTRICT DIVISION OF. HIGHWAYS " 4 FLOOD CONTROL 1 . PRELIMINARY MEETING STAFF REPORT q FINAL PLAN APPROVAL } PRECISE. PLAN (6) y LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) fk� 1 HEARINGS & ACTIONS DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING } , rr C) P.C. HEARING PUBLISHED ' PC. PUBLIC HEARING ' T APPLICANT NOTIFIED i C.C. PUBLIC HEARING 1 i N ' ORDINANCE NO. t RESOLUTION NO. ) EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA- BANK ZONING MAP CORRECTED " 1 ' ( I I ! i Ii1 . 19) C?:Eol�� off IPMIinm lmcp=(�PZVQ� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 1 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 14. 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. C/Z 85-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a nubile hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a chance of zone from R-3 (4) . one unit Der 4.000 sauare feet and R-I to a dual designation of R-3. one unit Der 2500 sauare feet., and Office Professional (OP) for the first two lots north of Alessandro Drive between San Carlos and Portola Avenue and a chano_e from R-I to R-2 (one unit per 4.000 sauare feet) for the triangular block bounded by Portola Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue. CAIALINA Q w W = i %(5) 0- y __ Y, v ' ... c i En rz+ J � � Q � � � � R =1 t or---� ,R t , At, MC' 00 000 RI.V E. h - 3 ( 4) and R - 1 to R- 3/ O'P a 0 Q H Mw A y ` s=iRl T E H I 1 }f�I f7 J F D Qi C-I - -q P U SAID public hearina will be held on Thursday. December i9. 1985 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber in the Palm Desert City Hall . 73-510 Fred Warina Drive- Palm Desert. California. at which time and oIace all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court. you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearina described in this notice. or in written correspon- dence delivered to the city council (or plannina commission) at. or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post Sheila R. Gilligan. City Clerk November 22. 1985 City of Palm Desert. California w f I 44-841 San Jacinto Palm Desert, CA 92260 December 10, 1985 Mr. Richard Erwood Planning Commission 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Mr. Erwood: During the November 5th Planning Commission meeting, a comment was made by Commissioner Jim Richards regarding Case No Z85-8 . Commissioner Richards commented that because Ehere were not many people in the audience that orally communicated negatively against this zone change, the issue should not be sent to committee. Please be advised that the legal notice sent to the affected property owners states , "If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. " The petition was delivered to the City Council and the Planning Commission prior to the public hearing. Many people have difficulty addressing a public forum and are not as proficient in public speaking as Commissioner Richards . Having attended other Planning Commission meetings, we know they become very detailed and time consuming. The petition spoke in protest and represents all the twenty-three people that signed it instead of having all twenty-three people stand up and state the same feelings. To do so would be redundant and would have expended the committees time and energy. BY SIGNING THE PETITION WE MADE OUR STATEMENT and hereby reaffirm our protest. Written correspondence should be considered as equally important as oral communications. This petition was and is submitted in lieu of oral communication. Sincerely, CMT SW_1 Mr. & Mrs . Robert A. and Neighbors October 21, 1985 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Gentlemen: THE UNDERSIGNED property owners and permanent residents hereby protest the proposed change of zoning implementing the Palma Village Specific Plan as prescribed in the City of Palm Desert Legal Notice (not dated) Case #C/Z 85-8 and any other proposed zone change that would allow zones other than R-1 in our long existing residential neighborhood. Higher density building do not belong in this area and it would be unjust and irresponsible if they were allowed. The environmental impact would be devastating as it would generate more hazardous traffic, jeopardize the security and privacy of our families and neighbors and decrease the value of our properties . WE THE UNDERSIGNED CITIZENS of this city, purchased our homes and properties to live in a pre-designated R-1 residential section and feel we should be able to continue to do so. DATE NAME / ADDRESS SIGNATURE I t 8S R. W'/ NEMA Kit �L �'/ .. v 1'.., r'./�•^: � f�t°.'..Cl�l `��- Yi .r r �[.'. Jy_. aA,I.C2 L=<�,-n u n A -e,4 -s 'zo-23 / 1`//a�reT;s 5 y 72-5 ".S anJ, s-, t 216. e ih�I ARE,YVL , ��o cl "1 c.v.ry L �lov�J xs� cud I October 21, 1985 THE UNDERSIGNED property owners and permanent residents hereby protest the proposed change of zoning implementing the Palma Village Specific Paln as prescribed in the City of Palm Desert Legal Notice (not dated) Case #C/Z 85-8 . DATE N E ADDRESS SIGNATU Id. V4-,, E' M Qg n )o A 2.c 16 `-� �t�� ti%sL -6P , io -a3-8S pb ov 4�V S-0 JQr:✓c dtekL i(-;�e e"-x-�, %C•-,�l�.ivN/S J/IlF�r(�/' �/�% 77y" 5/1/I :}iC.Sr _� -�/' tK/N C,, ) 5,{0 �A�1MU l September 27, 1985 Ms. Jean Benson The City Council 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Ms. Benson: This correspondence is submitted in our behalf as Mr. & Mrs. Robert King & Family, owners of a single family residence, who permanently reside at 44-841 San Jacinto, Palm Desert, Assessor's Parcel #627182011, described as Lot 10, Block 4 of Palma Village, Unit #1 and owners of Lot 9, Block 4, Palma Village, Unit #1. This letter is submitted as our protest to the proposed change of zoning as prescribed in City of Palm Desert Legal• Notice (not dated) Case #C/Z 85-8. We purchased these R-1 zoned properties for the sole purpose of raising our family and living in a secured, quiet and uncompromised neighborhood. This R-1 zoned neighborhood that we choose to invest our lives was assured us through the planning of responsible founding fathers of this community. It has been mandated to those of us as citizens of this city who elected to live in a pre-designated R-1 residential section to be able to continue to do so. Our objection to this proposed zone change is focused upon the fact that a 22 foot, 2 story structure will be allowed to exist directly across the street and on our immediate southerly property line. Our private patio and swimming pool area is located on the front portion (east) and adjoins San Jacinto Ave and any multiple story building which would be allowed to be built on either side directly incroaches upon our families security and privacy and also de•:aluates our property by as much as 25%. Our objections are also directed at the higher density residential apartments which would be allowed in our now and long existing residential neighborhood. Higher density buildings do not belong in this area and it would be unjust and irresponsible if they were allowed. The environmental impact would be devastating, our families security would be in jeopardy by a more transient population, more traffic would be generated an our very short street, which is already overrun by people using it as a short cut to go to the 7-11 on San Luis Rey. Please consider how you would feel , and what would occure if these same rezoning changes were to happen in your own neighborhood. Mr.& Mrs. Robert A. King & Family MINUTES ji PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 5, 1985 I adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1096, recommending iapproval of ZOA 85-8 to city council . Carried 5-0. I Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, I initiating an amendment to the Palma Village Specific Plan concerning the 45 foot parking easement for the west side of Monterey Avenue south of Fred Waring Drive. Carried 5-0. I B. Continued Case No. C/Z 85-8,- CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Consideration of changes of zone implementing the Palma Village Specific Plan from R-3 (4) , one unit per 4,000 square feet and R-1 to a dual designation of R-3, one unit per 2,500 square feet and OP, office professional for the first two lots on the north side of Alessandro Drive between San Carlos and Portola . Avenue and a change from R- I to R-2 for the triangular block bounded by Portola Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue. Mr. Drell gave and outline of the request. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MS. MARCIA JENKINS, 45-707 Deep Canyon, explained that she owns property next to the triangular shaped parcel . She expressed concern about whether people could build residential on Portola and felt that the other parcels should be zoned office professional also. She stated that three years ago sidewalk was installed and asked about Portola being widened and if the sidewalk would be ripped out and installed again. Mr. Holtz explained the process of how the street would be widened. Ms. Jenkins asked why Alessandro should be zoned different. Mr. Drell explained that it was better to block character along the back property line and noted that the city wished to avoid going Into a residential area and wanted to maintain single family homes on Portola, but that it could be reassessed in the future if no action takes place. MS. IRENE SCHMIDT, 44-794 San Jose, expressed the opinion that the commission felt the single family residences were not important. She stated that it was the one family residents that ihad. made the desert what it is by supporting it all year. She 9 I MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 5, 1985 stated that the place on Monterey and Fred Waring looked like a white elephant and expressed opposition to this being developed ' I on Alessandro. She also felt she was being pushed out of the II importance of her home. Chairman Crites asked staff to reassure Mrs. Schmidt that no reproduction of the Martin project that exists on the corner of Monterey and Fred Waring could exist under staff's regulations. Mr. Drell stated that under the proposed office professional zone it could not be repeated. MR. JAMES DURANT, 44-795 San Jose, felt it was a good plan, but did not want to see it go any further. He stated that the area needs sewer lines and curbs. Mr. Drell replied that as part of the Palma Village plan sewers were being studied. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. I Commissioner Richards stated that after 30 years of deterioration and the lots staying vacant it was time for some action. He felt the area between Fred Waring, Monterey, Highway III , and Deep Canyon provided one of the best of Palm Desert's areas to live. He stated that the city was not trying to encroach on the residential section, but to stop by creating a buffer to protect the single family homes. Commissioner Wood felt that this was the best solution. Commissioner Downs explained that the redevelopment agency was discussing a program to help single family homes refurbish the area. Commissioner Erwood spoke about the petition received and indicated that the commission had discussed sending this matter back to the committee for further study. Commissioner Richards withdrew his earlier opposition. Commissioner Downs felt that since this matter had been discussed extensively, it would not be an advantage to send it to the committee and stated that it would be going before the city council . Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-2 (Chairman iCrites and Commissioner Erwood voting no. ) Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1097, recommending 10 ' 1 _ I I j i i MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 5, 1985 I i I approval of C/Z 85-8 to the city council . Carried 3-2 (Chairman Crites and Commissioner Erwood voting no. ) I C. Continued Case No. ZOA 85-7 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Zoning ordinance amendment listing recreational vehicle parks as a conditional use in the R-I-M I and PR zones and establishing minimum standards for their development. Mr. Drell outlined the standards in the report and recommended approval . Commissioner Wood clarified that the amendment would allow for recreational vehicle park plans to be submitted to the city for consideration. Chairman Crites asked if it could be required that large canopy shade trees be provided. Mr. Drell replied yes. Mr. Smith suggested this be applied at the architectural review level . Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the case. There being no one, the Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Commissioner Wood noted that there was no harm in having this amendment and it also provided safe guards. Action: Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Erwood abstained due to absence of previous meeting discussion. ) Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Downs, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1098, recommending approval of ZOA 85-7 to city council . Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Erwood abstained due to absence of previous meeting discussion. ) D. Case No. PP 85-33 - R.K. DEVELOPMENT, Applicant Request for approval of a 44,000 square foot office/industrial ' complex located in a service industrial zone in the Cook Street Industrial Park at the corner of Beacon Hill and Sego Lane. 11 i I i MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 1, 1985 agenda. Commission concurred and Chairman Crites suspended the order of the agenda. E. Case No;' C%Z 85-8 CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant . .. Request for approval ' of changes- " of � zon. .e implementing the Palma Village Specific Plan from R-3- (4) , one -unit per 4,000 square feet and R-4 to a dual designation of R-3, one unit per 2, 500 square feet and OP, office professional for the first two lots on the north side of Alessandro Drive between San Carlos and Portola Avenue and a change from R-1 to R-2 for the triangular block bounded by Portola Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue. Mr. Diaz explained that the criteria for development in office professional was changing. He suggested that anyone wanting to develop in that zone should contact staff. He explained that staff had all the maps in the office. Commissioner Richards indicated that the committee had a constructive meeting regarding the office professional zoning and felt it was premature to discussion this matter until the changes have been implemented and urged commission to continue this case. Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, continuing C/Z 85-8 to November 5, 1985. Carried 5-0. i ! C. Continued Case Nos. GPA 85-5 AND C/Z 85-5 ARTHUR BAILEY, Applicant Request for approval of a general plan amendment from park to medium density residential , 5-7 dwelling units per acre, a change of zone from open space to PR-7 (planned residential , 7 dwelling units per acre) , development agreement, and a negative declaration of environmental impact for 58 acres located on the south side of 'Hovley Lane, between Portola Avenue and Eclectic Street. 6 �I PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (201f '.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Riverside ppFF am a citizen of the United States and a CITY OF PAL'M T resident of the County aforesaid; I am over Ob P 27 3 the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of fflyVI&M07 OP 47 or interested in the above-entitled matter. I CASE N0. /Z K am the principal clerk of the printer of the FrCE DESERT POST .................................................... ......................................................... Y A M ESEFT LEOAL1tOTICE Us" ..................................................... CASENOPC printed OT 5 HEPE6 NE 'I e a newspaper of general circulation, p ayq ese 9 P9 and published Bi—weekl.Y................. ° tlP a I. •. ......... s P I .3 T.s u a it ce .8 f'Igs in the City of ............. ale° "^ re lee I�Aks County of Riverside, and which news- a_tlso, he, , Anza.w0 , paper has been adjudged a newspaper o°pA* Rse40 Ihsnge of general circulation by the .Superior °tled a a= to ven e Stale Of -pd��,Po�rto A en-- nt a cep Court of the County of Riverside, nbsola E°er°ro eo?- 7(fe's1I(9 T as�tl4 a,abe 1985. W California, under the date of.1n[5.,, 19 .64., l °� n°' c mna "e m r— Pat ,ese I CitPMe &81 Fretl 83658 wa~o9 One Pa ,eser Cain ,; thatthenotice, ,2 dteda II Case Number ............... i'Ieresteo Pe�SpN are n te8t ge ,entl a'7ltlbveartl oa11�iiga of which.the annexed is a printed copy (set sae''°55�, n n eWrl,�os in type not smaller than nonpareil), has aeb° 1e0'w q e a,sed ssue, raascbmeone eb�eisetl been published in each regular and entire at "e"Puooc�near"B a`esctl e0 Ibi nc en tyros issue of said newspaper and. not In any e {t ponaence tlea eee itCHI as CWr(Citl. P 9C, 5 )at, supplement thereof on the following dates, ipriOi Pit ° U lac` ear nq to-wit: MoNA IAZ 'c star 9/2 a a3ert .................................................... —via qC n all in the year 19.,85 Pu PiBeOFl98 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct. Dated at,,,,,,,palm Desert California, this...2Oth,dayof-$.gP.tt 198.5.1 i n care Fre4 copis,of frill blank form n, Y Or tacund Iroml CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE BUREAU, Legal Advertising Clearing House 120 west Second St., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012 Telephone: 1213) 625.2541 Pita to nbunt e E N E N AL Proof of Publication wban orderinq thlt form. CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER 1. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council 11 . REQUEST: Approval of changes of zone implementing the Palma Village Specific Plan from R-3 (4) , one unit per 4,000 square feet and R-1 to a dual designation of R-3, one unit per 2,500 square feet and OP, office professional for the first two lots on the north side of Alessandro Drive between San Carlos and Portola Avenue and a change from R-I to R-2 for the triangular block bounded by Portola Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue. III . APPLICANT: CITY OF PALM DESERT IV. CASE NO: C/Z 85-8 V. DATE: December 19, 1985 V1 . CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation B. Discussion C. Draft Ordinance No. D. Planning Commission Minutes involving Case No. C/Z 85-8. E. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1097. F. Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 1 , 1985. G. Related maps and/or exhibits. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Waive further reading and pass to second reading. 8. DISCUSSION: This proposal originated within Palma Village Plan general policy which states that multi-family and commercial zones be of sufficient depth to allow efficient site plannina and creation of adequate buffer areas adjacent' to single family zones. The present one lot depth of the existing R-3 (4) zone narrows to 54 feet precluding any satisfactory development. The inclusion of the second lot between San Carlos and San Jacinto will increase the minimum depth to 112 feet with a maximum of 270 feet adjacent to the Wise Athletic Club. For projects to be consistent with the specific plan, predominant building would occur in the first row of lots with parking and landscaped buffer areas developed adjacent to the R- I zone. 1 The proposed zoning on Alessandro will allow a mixture of multi-family and office uses. The multi-family density is being increased from 10.9 du/acre to 17. 4 du/acre to allow competition with existing and proposed apartments elsewhere in the city. The San jacinto/Portola triangle is proposed to be changed from R-I to R-2. The widening and traffic increase on Portola make R-I development inappropriate for the lots fronting on that major thoroughfare. The shallowness of the lots on the north half of the triangle make any development difficult unless the Portola lots are combined with the San Jacinto lots. The R-2 zone will encourage this lot consolidation by allowing clustering of units and designs which can mitigate the impacts of Portola and create an acceptable transition for the R-I development on the west side of San Jacinto. At the planning commission public hearing neighboring residents expressed concern regarding the potential for high intensity two story construction. Under the recently amended R-2 and R-3 regulations, two story construction would be prohibited with 120 feet of the R-I zone. The proposed OP zone amendment would require a 65 foot setback for buildings 25 feet in height. The 36 parcels proposed for rezoning include 16 vacant lots, 4 commercial parking lots, 4 small apartment buildings, 10 single family homes and 2 buildings of undetermined use. For Alessandro Drive to develop into something more than a wide service road dominated by empty lots and poorly maintained buildings, zoning must allow viable projects which can be made compatible with both commercial and residential uses. The proposed zone change, followed by careful review of proposed projects, will encourage the consolidation of parcels required for the high quality compatible development. The planning commission recommended approval with a 3-2 vote. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /dlg ORDINANCE NO. A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CHANGE OF ZONE IMPLEMENTING THE PAL.MA Vii_ LAGE WEn FIC PLAN FROM R-3 (41 . ONE ', T' PFR 4,00n SOUAPE FEET AND - I TO A DUAL DESIGNATION, OF P-i . ONE LiN i T PEP 2 . 500 SQUARE FEET ANU i)P, OFF !Cc PR IFF. ,,tliJA'_ FOR THE ` i Rb f TWO t.UTj ON :tit ^:[1R ^. S L'�'C OF ALESSANDRi DR!vE. KF1WFEN VAN l-.ARLOS AND RORTOLA AVENUE AND A CHANGE FROM R- J TO R FOE? THE TRIANGULAR HLfir":�". BATTED RY PORTOI.A AdFNUE AND SAN JACiNTO AVEKE. CASE NO. C [ w-H WHEREAS. the City Counr ' I ref Erie City Of Palm Desert, Cal ifnrnia. did On the Koo day of Deremher. 14mb, nn;a ;a ruiv notir•pd cuhlir hearing to consider a change of zone implementing one Palma Village ;eerific plan from R-3 (4) , one unit cep 4.000 square fret arri, R- 1 to a du• i desi _;nar `.on of R-3. one unit per 500 Square feet and OP. offire profensl.^nal ror rn- . , .^ 'first two lots on the north side of A : es5.9ncro Drive netween `ion Carlo and Portoia Avenue and a change from R- 1 to P-! `Or one triangular Clock bounned ny POrtoia Avenue and San .;arinto Avenue. WHEREAS. said anpiwarion q3q compiled witn the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure ImnIF•me;;t.^,r '.on of the 1_a1 ifornia Environmental r ivallty Act . Resolution No . ._ ,- _., in rr.at Kno director of community: development has determined rn_;t rhp proposed charge of ;:or,a nas peen orevir'.;=,p assessed in connection with one Palma Village. `PPFiFic Plan for which negative declaration of env i rnnmenta 1 impart was ;1pprr.vOn. WHEREAS , at said wic hearing . upon hearing and crn;iderin 3! 1 tesrimon,v and argument`=, if. env. of all Persons desiring to hr+ heard, said city_ council did Find the fo.i .^'ding facts to itistiFy tneir action:. as des.^_:'I Oed rP i ow: I . The land use resulting lilting from Zne ._..an_ .-.� w;iU'!c n"' 'mmmdtible with .adjacent propo°',`r! land lases. c. The density resulting From the charge OF zone would be oompat :ble with densities permitted in t^.e ad arenr ^-area'-. 3. The proposed change of znne impiemenrs• rerommpndation of the Palma Village Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT ORDA i:v& ny the City _^_.t!rr i i of the City of Palm. Desert. as follows: . That the above • ec i`.at ions are true n•nd rorrect and cnn=.r i t"tr tna findings of trip commimnion in This case: 2. That the planning ._nmmission does n:-rrnry ano-cve i:nange of Zan,? rj-B. Exhibi .. "A. i me City Clerk of the City Of Palm !eSert - FOrnii'directed to publish this Ora inance in Tne neWSDaper rif general r! rculatlon. Published ann. rirrui.37- oc 7 City Of Palm Desert. C.-,Iifornia. and shall he in full i:. t effect thirty 1301 cay, after its amption. PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED 5t a repo or mopr_ ing Or 17np Pal;' 11P-.I'rr City Council . held on thi�� llaY of i ?85- by tnP F(�it !owin(, vote. to wit : ANS: NOES: A85ENT: ABSTAIN: RICHARD KELL! , Mayor A TEAT: SHEILA R. GULIGAN. City Clerk /tm E V J a Li. W � � I I II{I iii Lj- 3r, N3,�,v V101140d I n Nvs \a . 0 r W r� $u3 N � N 7 S O f . /y o / cr NbSw.. u 3 N "h Q: tJ •3�N3�b � Nl- �3�ih �I rl c w ;T 07 a Nvs W tc)mtti v CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MM ORDINANCE NO. [EKWD B 07 A DATE e MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION _ NOVEMBER 5, 1985 adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1096, recommending approval of ZOA 85-8 to city council . Carried 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, initiating an amendment to the Palma Village Specific Plan concerning the 45 foot parking easement for the west side of Monterey Avenue south of Fred Waring Drive. Carried 5-0. B. Continued Case No. C/Z 85-8 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Consideration of changes of zone implementing the Palma Village Specific Plan from R-3 (4) , one unit per 4,000 square feet and R-1 to a dual designation of R-3, one unit per 2,500 square feet and OP, office professional for the first two lots on the north side of Alessandro Drive between San Carlos and Portola Avenue and a change from R- 1 to R-2 for the triangular block bounded by Portola Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue. ' Mr. Drell gave and outline of the request. Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the proposed. MS. MARCIA JENKINS, 45-707 Deep Canyon, explained that she owns property next to the triangular shaped parcel . She expressed concern about whether people could build residential on Portola and felt that the other parcels should be zoned office professional also. She stated that three years ago sidewalk was installed and asked about Portola being widened and if the sidewalk would be ripped out and installed again. Mr. Holtz explained the process of how the street would be widened. Ms. Jenkins asked why Alessandro should be zoned different. Mr. Drell explained that it was better to block character along the back property line and noted that the city wished to avoid going into a residential area and wanted to maintain single family homes on Portola, but that it could be reassessed in the future if no action takes place. MS. IRENE SCHMIDT, 44-794 San Jose, expressed the opinion that the commission felt the single family residences were not important. She stated that it was the one family residents that had made the desert what it is by supporting it all year. She 9 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 5, 1985 and Fred Waring looked like a stated that the place on Monterey 9 white elephant and expressed opposition to this being developed on Alessandro. She also felt she was being pushed out of the importance of her home. Chairman Crites asked staff to reassure Mrs . Schmidt that no reproduction of the Martin project that exists on the corner of Monterey and Fred Waring could exist under staff's regulations. Mr. Drell stated that under the proposed office professional zone it could not be repeated. MR. JAMES DURANT, 44-795 San Jose, felt it was a good plan, but did not want to see it go any further. He stated that the area needs sewer lines and curbs. Mr. Drell replied that as part of the Palma Village plan sewers were being studied. Chairman Crites closed the public testimony. Commissioner Richards stated that after 30 years of deterioration and the lots staying vacant it was time for some action. He felt the area between Fred Waring, .Monterey, Highway 111 , and Deep Canyon provided one of the best of Palm Desert's areas to live. He stated that the city was not trying to encroach on the residential section, but to stop by creating a buffer to protect the single family homes. Commissioner Wood felt that this was the best solution. Commissioner Downs explained that the redevelopment agency was discussing a program to help single family homes refurbish the area. Commissioner Erwood spoke about the petition received and indicated that the commission had discussed sending this matter back to the committee for further study. Commissioner Richards withdrew his earlier opposition. Commissioner Downs felt that since this matter had been discussed extensively, it would not be an advantage to send it to the committee and stated that it would be going before the city council . Action: Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting the findings as presented by staff. Carried 3-2 (Chairman Crites and Commissioner Erwood voting no. ) Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1097, recommending 10 I i � I - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1097 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE IMPLEMENTING THE PALMA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN FROM R-3 (4) , ONE UNIT PER 4,000 SQUARE FEET AND R-1 TO A DUAL DESIGNATION OF R-3, ONE UNIT PER 2,500 SQUARE FEET AND OP, OFFICE PROFESSIONAL FOR THE FIRST TWO LOTS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALESSANDRO DRIVE BETWEEN SAN CARLOS AND PORTOLA AVENUE AND A CHANGE FROM R-1 TO R-2 FOR THE TRIANGULAR BLOCK BOUNDED BY PORTOLA AVENUE AND SAN JACINTO AVENUE. CASE NO. C/Z 85-8_ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of November, 1985, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a change of zone implementing the Palma Village Specific Plan from R-3 . (4) , one unit per 4,000 square feet and R-1 to a dual designation of R-3, one unit per 2,500 square feet and OP, office professional for the first two lots on the north side of Alessandro Drive between San Carlos and Portola Avenue and a change from R-I to R-2 for the triangular block bounded by Portola Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue. WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the proposed change of zone has been previously assessed in connection with the Palma Village Specific Plan for which a i, negative declaration of environmental impact was approved. jWHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: 1 . The land use resulting from the change of zone would be compatible with adjacent proposed land uses. 2. The density resulting from the change of zone would be compatible with densities permitted in the adjacent areas. 3. The proposed change of zone implements recommendation of the Palma Village Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That the planning commission does hereby recommend to the city council approval of a Change of Zone 85-8, Exhibit "A." I _ _ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. io a PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 5th day of November, 1985, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, RICHARDS, AND WOOD NOES: CRITES AND ERWOOD ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE BUFORD RITES, Chairman ATTESTi- RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary! /tm 2 C CA i.1l INS War (: I � 1 71717 ' 1 I C \ R- I ? R-I 2 a 18,40 0 o� ¢` cn CIE " < R- 1 to R-2,, N = R-3 c i c= F AAad 0 AI v �---� I c-1 s.P- I h_3 (4) and R- 1 to R-3/OP 1 1 i , � l W l_ p] 4a CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION QMLSF(M72 QT M(DZ-�UZ= RESOLUTION NO. 577� � �� A C/Z DATE - City of Palm Desert Department of Community Development/Planning Staff Report TO. Planning Commission DATE: October, 1 , 1985 CASE NO: C/Z 85-8 REQUEST: Approval of changes of zone implementing the Palma Village Specific Plan from R-3 (4) , one unit per 4,000 sauare feet and R-1 to a dual designation of R-3, one unit per 2,500 square feet and OP, office professional for the first two lots on the north side of Alessandro Drive between San Carlos and Portola Avenue and a change from R-1 to R-2 for the triangular block bounded by Portola Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue_. APPLICANT: CITY OF PALM DESERT 1 . BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: This proposal originated within Palma Village Plan general policy which states that multi-family and commercial zones by of sufficient depth to allow efficient site planning and creation of adequate buffer areas adjacent to single family zones. The present one lot depth of the existing R-3 (4) zone narrows to 54 feet precluding any satisfactory development. The inclusion of the second lot between San Carlos and San Jacinto will increase the minimum depth to 112 feet with a maximum of 270 feet adjacent to the Wise Athletic Club. For projects to be consistent with the specific plan, predominant building would occur in the first row of lots with parking and landscaped buffer areas developed adjacent to the R-1 zone. The proposed zoning on Alessandro will allow a mixture of multi -family and office uses. The multi-family density is being increased from 10.9 du/ac to 17.4 du/ac to allow competition with existing and proposed apartments elsewhere in the city. The San Jacinto/Portola triangle is proposed to be changed from R-1 to R-2. The widening and traffic increase on Portola make R-I development inappropriate for the lots fronting on that major thoroughfare. The shallowness of the lots on the north half of the triangle make medium density difficult unless the Portola lots are combined with the San Jacinto lots. The R-2 zone will encourage this lot consolidation by allowing clustering of units and designs which can mitigate the impacts of Portola and create an acceptable transition for the R-1 development on the west side of San Jacinto. STAFF REPORT c/z 85-8 Continued The 36 parcels proposed for rezoning include 16 vacant lots. 4 commercial parking lots, 4 small apartment buildings. 10 single family homes and 2 buildings of undetermined use. For Alessandro Drive to develop into something more than a wide service road dominated by empty lots and poorly maintained buildings, zoning must allow viable projects which can be made compatible with both commercial and residential uses. The proposed zone changes, followed by careful review of proposed projects will encourage the consolidation of parcels required for the high quality compatible development. it. RECOMMENDATION: A special city council /planning commission subcommittee has been formed to consider changes to the office professional zone relative to building height and setbacks. While staff recommends approval of the proposed zone change, action by the planning commission to recommend the OP designation should be delayed until the proposed ordinance amendment is scheduled for public hearing. At that time, all affected property owner's will be in a better position to assess the impact of the. zone change. Therefore, staff recommends that the planning commission open the public hearing, take testimony on the more general issues of zone change, then continue the hearing until November 5. 1985. Prepared by Reviewed and Approved by /dig 2 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 - TELEPHONE (619) 346.0611 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. C/Z 85-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a change of zone from R-1 and R-3 (4,000) to a dual designation of R-3 (2,500) multi-family one unit per 2.500 square feet of lot area and office professional for lots generally located in the area 150 feet north of Alessandro Drive between De Anza Way and Portola Avenue and a change from R-I to R-2 (4,000) for lots bounded by San Jacinto Avenue and Portoia Avenue with the exception of those lots to be rezoned R-3. C CA MINA � J � 2 W W 4 W LI = I n 2 Z > I W Q `• ^^ R=I j o EL IVE 22f5) a h Z 4 ? �7 \ q nE _ R- 1 t0 R- 2 .. AN ..a L J = F i Poo Rz i 4 14000 ' Q _ R-3 r yyE-R� Z. R.J1 _ F C-I • A oAlrf : G C-1 S. I b-3 (4) and R- 1y to R-3/0P El I II ,S.P T; iC-I ,.S.P. _ � � - - i r-1' z _l.i G j1 SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday. October 1 . 1985 at 7:00 p.m. _ In the Council Chamber In the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all Interested persons are . Invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or In written correspon- dence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at. or prior to, .the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ. Secretary &�CITY 0 ENS� C)L ERT IVICEcin �f ------------- J i ez.� ` � i v �� s C September 27, 1985 SEP 3 0 1985 Ramon A. Diaz, Secretary ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Palm Desert Planning Commission CITY OF PALM DESERT 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Mr. Diaz: This correspondence is submitted in our behalf as Mr. & Mrs. Robert King & Family, owners of a single family residence, who permanently reside at 44-841 San Jacinto, Palm Desert, Assessor's Parcel #627182011, described as Lot 10, Block 4 of Palma Village, Unit #1 and owners of Lot 9, Block 4, Palma Village, Unit #1. This letter is submitted as our protest to the proposed change of zoning as prescribed in Cfty of Palm Desert Legal Notice (not dated) Case #C/Z 85-8. We purchased these R-1 zoned properties for the sole purpose of raising our family and living in a secured, quiet and uncompromised neighborhood. This R-1 zoned neighborhood that we choose to invest our lives was assured us through the planning of responsible founding fathers of this community. It has been mandated to those of us as citizens of this city who elected to live in a pre-designated R-1 residential section to be able to continue to do so. Our objection to this proposed zone change is focused upon the fact that a 22 foot, 2 story structure will be allowed to exist directly across the street and on our immediate southerly property line. Our private patio and swimming pool area is located on the front portion (east) and adjoins San Jacinto Ave and any multiple story building which would be allowed to be built an either side directly incroaches upon our families security and privacy and also devaluates our property by as much as 25%. Our objections are also directed at the higher density residential apartments which would be allowed in our now and long existing residential neighborhood. Higher density buildings do not belong in this area and it would be unjust and irresponsible if they were allowed. The environmental impact would be devastating, our families security would be in jeopardy by a more transient population, more traffic would be generated an our very short street, which is already overrun by people using it as a short cut to go to the 7-11 on San Luis Rey. Please consider how you would feel , and what would occure if these same rezoning changes were to happen in your own neighborhood. tMnr.&�1Mrs. (Robert A. King & Family >r"J�.::iCw.•.= __.� _ — �.••.� — — S —+x .a3G.Y�wew�e wr..w 47. tp -- --------•.•l,ei=• —�'r�31�/�l" ----/��i�.J^-!c'_��Cti1-Clio Cyr CCGC%..��''%�.GC�1Lc.:r _.L�.::.Z..i�-//,�..C�[c�C�oc -� •sue — ✓/�.�c--64 �^ - �a_�_ z / f � L� K..I � La!!r�!�iP• �J 9 Le 1M 19 !OV 1 1985 ENVi3Ctin1ENT.4L SERVICES CiTY OF PALM DESERT October 21 , 1985 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Gentlemen: THE UNDERSIGNED property owners and permanent residents hereby protest the proposed change of zoning implementing the Palma Village Specific Plan as prescribed in the City of Palm Desert Legal Notice (not dated) Case #C/Z 85-8 and any other proposed zone change that would allow zones other than R-1 in our long existing residential neighborhood. Higher density building do not belong in this area and it would be unjust and irresponsible if they were allowed. The environmental impact would be devastating as it would generate more hazardous traffic, jeopardize the security and privacy of our families and neighbors and decrease the value of our properties . WE THE UNDERSIGNED CITIZENS of this city, purchased our homes and properties to live in a pre-designated R-1 residential section and feel we should be able to continue to do so. DATE NAME )) ADDRESS SIGNATURE 1 �a,.ror 1Ciu 44-641 Sw.�TwcNTn * R. WYNEMA KING 4V-841 Vye�O r[:o gt>c rnt y�-✓I Sr C(?n �n sc+ 0 rt7 c/AN.ttT-� ka-g-,eXV ily 79.E 5,�T.r � � u aa� �rrFr� Ste,, coy,-A rs � yy 725 .�'AV, fo 5, I WJase (ILI1 �.rC� October 21 , 1985 THE UNDERSIGNED property owners and permanent residents hereby protest the proposed change of zoning implementing the Palma Village Specific Paln as prescribed in the City of Palm Desert Legal Notice (not dated) Case #C/Z 85-8 . DATE N 4E ADDRESS SIGNATU /�,�/�' _�!G .� y/1G7� �r,�•�-fir AI M Da r, )o lei `- _a,3-ems a T t , 01buJoutic/ /o-S'� '�S a /o��ENF S'OffiXIDT - _ p /a�.1��evivit rcY<�l` yY79y sn�v �es� � _4'0 171wLILILLItiwul IIC1 nn3r.v tl11 140d '4 GV _ ! O 0 3n CC 1 o tr -� SIA j a }I C1 L9 T xx 3_ N Ay r� .-y. G NVSn.�. C --- -� - t CE �� '�. N k!s s�.• �I � Z a � I � � t Y'� % � � I 1] ♦ 'Y F bra �r ,a�„ vs- a: •3nN3A b t'S i N r V 0 -1 B V d NVS 3 © 38 cv d Fq N CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. A DATE 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. C/Z 85-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a change of zone from R-1 and R-3 (4,000) to a dual designation of R-3 (2,500) multi-family one unit per 2,500 square feet of lot area and office professional for lots generally located in the area 150 feet north of Alessandro Drive between De Anza Way and Portola Avenue and a change from R-I to R-2 (4,000) for lots bounded by San Jacinto Avenue and Portola Avenue with the exception of those lots to be rezoned R-3. CA ALINA C 0 _j 3 m w Q W W 2 i z 2 � w Ib ! R J R=i a FE EL )RIVE --4- " K �2(5) a �.. _ P Q �Z CO _ y a ¢ M e y^ P R+ a R- 1 to R - 2 . '. �. ";','V AN Mal. ()J }^)f^l - - R-3 - Z EiRR Q SA Nam. _-. ._ kl V G p- 3 ( 4 ) and R - 1 to R - 3/ OP , ! aAL M DE ' = uT E S .,L N W S.P. y� i f•SAID public hearing will be held on Tuesday, October I , 1985 at 7:00 p.m. In the Council Chamber in the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspon- dence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary September 20, 1985 Palm Desert Planning Commission ''!0V 1985 ENV;-(QW:1EN7AL SERVICES Clll• OF PALM DESERT October 21 , 1985 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Gentlemen: THE UNDERSIGNED property owners and permanent residents hereby protest the proposed change of zoning implementing the Palma Village Specific Plan as prescribed in the City of Palm Desert Legal Notice (not dated) Case #C/Z 85-8 and any other proposed zone change that would allow zones other than R-1 in our long existing residential neighborhood. Higher density building do not belong in this area and it would be unjust and irresponsible if they were allowed. The environmental impact would be devastating as it would generate more hazardous traffic, jeopardize the security and privacy of our families and neighbors and decrease the value of our properties. WE THE UNDERSIGNED CITIZENS of this city, purchased our homes and properties to live in a pre-designated R-1 residential section and feel we should be able to continue to do so. DATE NAME 7 ADDRESS SIGNATURE �C S140: l�CENLp ! "-T"T R. WYNEMA KA(!C, 44-941 San, Tiirxr�c� \A/�,� �eo r�.o Rn_��v.'{'" 4�{•FrI Sr Sam Ise A; /O L 'CA 410 R y�lP/� S4rt .(DCrl� �fVL Sw'769 'SZ) 14� 3 7�o.v ��dt;s `19725-YA,,A dos. v /gt� -g`,S A R r rvco D kJ °1 g aM vc6e— FW04 October 21 , 1985 THE UNDERSIGNED property owners and permanent residents hereby protest the proposed change of zoning implementing the Palma Village Specific Paln as prescribed in the City of Palm Desert Legal Notice (not dated) Case #C/Z 85-8 . DATE N AE ADDRESS SIGNATU ,-AUAA L. law) Ae f ti -t iSZ io -a3-�S Ob u 4y-Pa-S u Y k !�-�3��PNNIS /(G!Y<Rl vv7sy .slur �1es.- �'p 3-46- 1937 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE IMPLEMENTING THE PALMA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN FROM R-3 (4) , ONE UNIT PER 4,000 SQUARE FEET AND R-I TO A DUAL DESIGNATION OF R-3, ONE UNIT PER 2, 500 SQUARE FEET AND OP, OFFICE PROFESSIONAL FOR THE FIRST TWO LOTS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALESSANDRO DRIVE BETWEEN SAN CARLOS AND PORTOLA AVENUE AND A CHANGE FROM R-I TO R-2 FOR THE TRIANGULAR BLOCK BOUNDED BY PORTOLA AVENUE AND SAN JACINTO AVENUE. CASE NO. C/Z 85-8 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of November, 1985, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a change of zone implementing the Palma Village Specific Plan from R-3 (4) , one unit per 4,000 square feet and R-1 to a dual designation of R-3, one unit per 2,500 square feet and OP, office professional for the first two lots on the north side of Alessandro Drive between San Carlos and Portola Avenue and a change from R-1 to R-2 for the triangular block bounded by Portola Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue. WHEREAS,. said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89, " in that the director of community development has determined that the proposed change of zone has been previously assessed in connection with the Palma Village Specific Plan for which a negative declaration of environmental impact was approved. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: 1 . The land use resulting from the change of zone would be compatible with adjacent proposed land uses. 2. The density resulting from the change of zone would be compatible with densities permitted in the adjacent areas. 3. The proposed change of zone implements recommendation of the Palma Village Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case; 2. That the planning commission does hereby recommend to the city council approval of a Change of Zone 85-8, Exhibit "A." PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 5th day of November, 1965, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /tm 2 , CA TA L i N♦ w A 1( C III l a I I R -411 717711 R= I R=1 � w I `_• iWL -777 77 — z t R-1 f` a I CA 3A ( 4p) and �R- 1 to Rp` 3 C W Ap c-L , SI ISPTC CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION ZMZILSF( (:)T "' RESOLUTION NO. .o C� E � C/Z OATS �_ 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. ZOA 85-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearina will be held before the Palm Desert Plannina Commission to consider an amendment to section 25.25 office professional zone of the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance relating to building heiahts and setbacks. SAID public hearing wi l l be held on Tuesday. November 5. 1985 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber in the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive. Palm Desert. California. at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court. you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspon- dence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to. the public hearina. PUBLISH: Desert Post Ramon A. Diaz. Secretary October 25. 1985 Palm Desert Planning Commission 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 14, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. ZOA 85-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a zoning ordinance amendment relating to building heights and setbacks in the Office Professional zone. SAID public hearing wi I 1 be held on Thursday. December 5, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber in the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspon- dence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post Sheila R. Gilligan, City Clerk November 22, 1985 City of Palm Desert, California 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 14, 1985 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. C/Z 85-8 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a change of zone from R-3 (4) . one unit per 4,000 square feet and R-1 to a dual designation of R-3, one unit per 2500 square feet, and Office Professional (OP) for the first two lots north of Alessandro Drive between San Carlos and Portola Avenue and a change from R-1 to R-2 (one unit per 4,000 square feet) for the triangular block bounded by Portola Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue. SAID public hearing will be held on Thursday, December 5, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber in the Palm Desert City Hall , 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. If you challenge the proposed actions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspon- dence delivered to the city council (or planning commission) at, or prior to, the public hearing. PUBLISH: Desert Post Sheila R. Gilligan, City Clerk November 22, 1985 City of Palm Desert, California agar SEP21 1985 ENENTAL D S CITY OF ERT S - p fi t z �� %71 ui� LGti (iL- i