HomeMy WebLinkAboutSAN PABLO AVENUE/CATALINA WAY/SAN GORGONIO C/Z 84-19 1984 PRECISE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT
ZONE CHANCEC,_ Z ?4- PARCEL MAP
VARIANCE
C.U.p. .____
REFER TO:
APPLICANT " SUM �UG�
LOCATION : _
REQUE0 EXISTING ZONE
PREPARATION PROGRESS
DATE BY COMMENTS 3
APPLIC_A_TION RECEIVED
LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT
NOTICES_ SENT l I
FIELD INVESTIGATION l +
DEPTS._ NOTIFIED
BUII_D1NG -
ENGINE:ERING
FIRE
POLICE
RECREATION & PARKS
SCHOOL DISTRICT
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
FLOOD CONTROL
PRELIMINARY MEETING
STAFF REPORT
FINAL PLAN APPROVAL
PRECISE PLAN (6)
LANDSCAPING PLAN (5)
PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6)
HEARINGS & ACTIONS
DATE ACTION VOTE
REVIEW BOARD HEARING
y
P.C. HEARING PUBLISHED
P.C. PIJ13LIC HEARING
APPLICANT NOTIFIED
C.C. PUBLIC HEARING
ORDINANCE NO.
RESOLUTION NO•
EFFECTIVE DATE
RECORDED FOR DATA- BANK
ZONING MAP CORRECTED
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE,PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
CITY OF PALM DESERT
LEGAL NOTICE
CASE NO. C/Z 84-19
NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Palm
Desert City Council to consider est by CITY 017 PALM DESERT for approval
of a chanae of zone from R-2a uu R-3 S.O. (multi-farnily. senior housina
overlay) for the block nenerally bounded by San Pablo Avenue. San Raphael
AvP.nue, Cat-al in.r Way and San Gornonio Way. urine Partll:ulerly described as:
APN NO'S. 627-112-02 through 08
627-141-02. 03, 04, 11 . 12, 15 11 16 —
A i �U AI I I I I
�J FRE ARIN DRIVE ormer
— _ I I I IIIII
-11 -
\ SA k IA fl 0SA W M r
R_I _ >' � ANIA o A
r ( _
r � - w -
' H N C N O AY PH
rYE
a o R I 10, 00
4j C A I A L I N A W 1 Y
W AIALINA
IR I e Il ) '
Y,
tR-I , N a NROTA a PALM HY p 0 IA
R2
" a W On
R I gRJ)
R I
a \ � NWB a
" w r
e 9AH = G�RO,ONIO 3
[�'] �Fnl
� o
4 4 b o ® H
S.P. C�� S P
SAID public hear no will be held on Thursday. September 12, 1985 at 7:00 P.M.
in the Council Chamber in the Palm Desert City Hall . 73-510 Fred Warina Drive,
Palm Desert, California, at which time and Place all interested persons
invited to attend and he heard. IF you challenge the Proposed actions in`a;?:
court. you rnav be limited to raisinq only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice. or in written correspon-
dence delivered to the city council (or piannino commission) at, or prior to,
the public. hearing.
PUBLISH: Desert Post Sheila R. Gilligan
I
CITY OF PALM DESERT
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
I. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
11 . REQUEST: Approval of change of zone from R-2 to R-3 S.O. and from
R-3 to R-3 S.O. for the block bounded by San Pablo Avenue,
San Rafael Avenue, Catalina Way and San Gorgonio Way.
I11. APPLICANT: HOLMBERG AND TONER MARGARET PAINE
10622 Katella Avenue 4944 Cass Street 41101
Anaheim, CA San Diego, CA
CITY OF PALM DESERT
1V. CASE NO: C/Z 84-19
V. DATE: September 12, 1985
VI. CONTENTS:
A. Staff Recommendation
B. Discussion
C. Draft Ordinance No.
0. Plannina Commission Minutes involving Case No. C/Z 84-19
E. Plannina Commission Resolution No. 1064
F. Plannina Commission Staff Report dated July 2. 1985
G. Related maps and/or exhibits
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Waive further reading and pass to second reading.
B. DISCUSSION:
This request is the first rezoning pursuant to tie recommendation of the
Palma Villaae Specific Plan. Of the 19 lots, 6 are presently zoned R-3,
7 are vacant, 10 are developed at R-3 densities and 2 are single family.
The rezoning is designed to encourage upgraded multi-family and senior
housina at densities compatible with the existing development. The
planning commission unanimously recommended approval .
This case is a revision of an application originally heard by the planning
commission on January 15 which involved three parcels on San Rafael-
Avenue. At that hearing, a petition of opposition was submitted. signecl"
by many of the remaining R-2 property owners In the block. There was some
concern the remaining R-2 lot would become a buffer between San Rafael and
San Pablo. '
-f
The hearing was continued pendina completion of the Palma Village Specific
Plan, Since the specific plan recommended that the entire block be
rezoned to R-3, the original application was expanded to include the
remainino R-2 parcels.
At the August 6th hearing there was no opposition to the revised proposal .
In a letter, Michael Fife, who testified at the January 15th hearing and
submitted the opposition petitions has indicated that the expanded
Proposal including the senior housing overlay is acceptable.
Prepared by
/dla
PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
(2015.5 C. )
_) Qp
—i Ul
n C
rn c� rn
rn C'�
X Cr1 M
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, N <
County of Riverside Cl, =D rn
I am a citizen of the United States and a CITY OF PALM DESERT cD o
resident of the County aforesaid; I am over C"
the age of eighteen years, and not a party to Proof of Publication of
or interested in the above-entitled matter. I CASE NO . C/Z 84-19
amthe principal clerk of the printer of the .......................................... ...............
DESERT POST
.................................................. ..........................................................
ryA MP SR
LEGALNGTICE
CASE WC2W
a newspaper of general circulation, printed PO...
a P Doser�P G
oils
and published ................. FRA MDE ERtr r a 21
ME6 e 1 9
bbd noral da
in the City of ............. RS one a all
County of Riverside, and which news- a ea ar rI
escr aes.
paper has been adjudged a newspaper PNf _D
of general circulation by the .Superior
AID
Court of the County of Riverside, State of
Cl barring
alto lige me
California, under the dale of,lA/.5.., 19 .6.4., ad
Cal'ar
83658 other, rsa� r.
e �nd� and f
Case Number ................: that the notice, aye e�orovd aa�5
of which the annexed is a printed copy (set Ss. Me
in• t'ype not smaller than nonpareil), has a,S. o °
9C1M11e0 OIiC
been published in each regular and entire a e
e is ni 9 Omms
issue of said newspaper and not in anya 1
supplement thereof on the following dates, BBfn RAMo.
to-wit: ep. 2 9551°
7/26
....................................................
85
all in the year 19......
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Dated at...........Pnlm.....De...s..e..r..t................
California, ihis..ZAA; ..dayof..J.uJ.Y, 1985
' Sig fur I
Free C0914%of Ihla blank lorm may be aocurad from:
CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER SERVICE
BUREAU, INC.
Legal Advertising Clearing House
120 West Second st., Los Angeles, Calif. 90012
Telephone: (213) 625.2541
Pleat,rogwat GENE AAL Proof Of Publlcallon
when ordering 11116 form.
ORDINANCE NO. _
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A CHANGE OF
ZONE FROM R-2 AND R-3 TO R-3 5.0. . FOR THE BLOCK
GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SAN PABLO AVENUE , SAN
RAPHAEL AVENUE, CATALINA WAY AND SAN GORGONIO
WAY.
CASE NO: C/Z 84-19
WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on
the 12th day of September. 1985, hold a duly noticed Public hearing to consider
a change of zone from R-2 and R-3 to R-3 S.O. for the block generally bounded
by San Pablo Avenue. San Raphael Avenue, Catalina Way and San Gorgonio Way.
WHEREAS. said application has complied with the requirements of the "City
of Palm Desert Procedures of Implementation of the California Environmental
(Duality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental
services has determined that the Proposed changed of zone has been previously
assessed in connection with the Palma Village Specific Plan for which a
necative declaration of environmental impact was approved.
WHEREAS. at said Public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments. if any, of all interested persons desiring to be
heard, said city council did find the following facts to Justify their actions,
as described below:
1 . The land use resulting from the chance of zone would be compatible
with adjacent Proposed land uses.
2. The density resulting from the change of zone would be compatible
with densities permitted in the adjacent areas.
3. The change of zone implements recommendation of the Palma Village
Specific Plan.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Pa 1 m
Desert. as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the
findings of the commission in these cases:
2. That C/Z 84-19 Exhjbt "A" is approved.
3. The City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert. California. 15 hereby
directed to publish this ordinance in the Palm Desert Post, a
newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the
City of Palm Desert. California. and shall be in full force and
effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1064
PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert
City Council , held on this __ day of �._. 1985 by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
WALTER H. SNYDER, Mayor
ATTEST:
SHEILA R. GILLIGAN. City Clerk
City of Palm Desert. California
/dla
��aY1■1■■ 1■1■■ s���■��:■■■■1 ��IIIC�I���p� �GmQa
�i[1■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■ 3111011 Mill 1 OMNI
911111111 111N1YPY/1141YY1Y1 � ��iINYYYYIYY . IY1YIY6NG1111111Y1 1low
1 0 SUM •
II�YYYYLYY 1■1Y11!!Yl1R�1YY1Y1 ,�� �i _
B!!l111111 111111!!N�11�l111111 . _...
NYN■YYo■Y 111Y1YYY`1NNN■Y1Y1 ,. l ; x • �, YL ��
[In0111�11 IIIIIIGC�Ea111111 � N4.,, � �■ ��
a A
EXHI : IT �
3E oF rHE DESERT
- R-
ARING MD W7RIVE Corm n 441h
W w :r I I ra
a f.'n ; Se aJLL
_ �. Lii
'L
I I i I I j lei 119111 1 1 1 1m %0 50. 1
R-I R=
N IL v Lw, -
R-2 (3) R-2 (b) R2(5)' a
cd
- v R_
� R• ? � . �`
Rc Rel. R-1
Wl - _ R314)
C-1 S. P <" c-+,s.e I c-1 s.e C- I , S. P. c-1,
L 0 ® K w A Y
flap -- , C-I,S.P. p, C-I , S. G+ S.-P -i
r c c-PASE0
C-1 fc, I+ S-P C-1 Rs C-I._
lM) 2oA=
•,. oe ., ., _ Tirl—;I.l P.R.-6
:•
CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL
CZ 84 - 19 ORDINANCE NO.
ENWO o QT A DATE
August 28 , 1985
Mayor Walter H . Snyder
Richard Kelly , Mayor Pro-Tem
Jean Benson , Council Member —
Phyllis Jackson , Council Member
S . Roy Wilson Council Member
c/o Phil Drell
CITY OF PALM DESERT
73-510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert , CA 92260
Dear Mayor & City Council Members :
Earlier this year , I circulated a petition to fellow property
owners on Catalina Way regarding the change in zoning for some
vacant land located on San Rafael .
After reviewing some of the Palma Village specific plan recom-
mendations and after conversations with Phil Drell , the concerns
that I expressed in the previously submitted petition had been
satisfied .
Specifically , I had been concerned that my property located at
the corner of San Rafael and Catalina Way would remain in R2
zoning while the property immediately adjacent to the property
would be zoned R3. With the revised boundaries for the zone
change , I ' m satisfied with all properties now being zoned R3 on
Catalina Way between San Rafael and San Pablo .
Sincerely ,
5 e
MICHAEL E . FIFE
MEF/va
MINUTES
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 6, 1985
r—
Mr. Drell gave a summary of the case.
Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone
wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION.
MR. TOM STARR spoke in favor of the amendment.
Commissioner Richards requested that exhibit "B" regarding the height
maximums and flat versus pitched roofs be sent to the architectural
commission for review.
Action:
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs,
approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0.
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs,
adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1063, Exhibit "A",
recommending approval of ZOA 85-3 to city council . Carried 5-0.
Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Downs, to
continue Exhibit "B" to the August 20, 1985 meeting. Carried 5-0.
8. Case No. C/Z 84-19 - HOLMBERG AND TONER, Applicants
Request for approval of a change of zone from R-2
to R-3 S.O. for the block bounded by San Pablo
Avenue, Catalina Way and San Gorgonio Way.
Mr. Drell explained that the next three public hearing items were
zone changes from recommendations of the Palm Valley Specific Plan
Committee. He showed a video presentation of the sites.
Chairman Crites opened the public testimony and asked if anyone
present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to the request. There
being no one, the public testimony was closed.
Chairman Crites asked for a motion by the commission.
Actions
Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards,
approving the findings as presented by staff. Carried 5-0.
Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards,
adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 1064, recommending
approval of C/Z 84-19 to city council . Carried 5-0.
6
ANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION :. I064
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO
THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE
FROM R-2 AND R-3 TO R-3 S.O. , FOR THE BLOCK
GENERALLY BOUNDED BY SAN PABLO AVENUE, SAN
RAPHAEL AVENUE, CATALINA WAY AND SAN GORGONIO
WAY.
CASE NO: C/Z 84-19
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert. California,
did on the 6th day of Auaust. 1985. hold a duly noticed public hearing to
consider a change of zone from R-2 and R-3 to R-3 5.0. for the block generally
bounded by San Pablo Avenue, San Raphael Avenue, Catalina Way and San Gorgonio
Way.
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City
of Palm Desert Procedures of Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89". in that the director of environmental
services has determined that the proposed changed of zone has been previously
assessed in connection with the Palma Village Specific Plan for which a
negative declaration of environmental impact was approved.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all Interested persons desiring to be
heard, said planning commission did find the following facts to justify their
actions, as described below:
I . The land use resulting from the change of zone wou 1 d be compat i b 1 e
with adjacent proposed land uses.
2. The density resulting from the change of zone would be compatible
with densities permitted in the adjacent areas.
3. The change of zone implements recommendation of the Palma Village
Specific Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Palm Desert, as follows:
1 . That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the
findings of the commission In these cases;
2. That the planning commission does hereby recommend to the city
council approval of C/Z 84-19 Exhibit "A" .
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1064
i
PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert
Planning Commission. held on this 6th day of August, 1985 by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES: DOWNS, ERWOOD, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
BUFORD A. CRITES, Chairman
ATTEST:
ice.".✓s!/'V• �:.v:�»
RAMON A. DIAZ, Sec et
/dig
City of Palm Desert
Department of Community Development/Planning
Staff Report
Planning 9 Commission
DATE: August 6, 1985
CASE NO: C/Z 84-19
REQUEST: Approval of a change of zone from R-2 to R-3 S.O. for the block
bounded by San Pablo Avenue, San Raphael Avenue, Catalina Way
and San Gorgonio Way.
APPLICANT: HOLMBERG AND TONER MARGARET PAINE
10622 Katella Avenue 4944 Cass Street #1101
Anaheim, CA 92804 San Diego, CA 92109
CITY OF PALM DESERT
I. BACKGROUND:
The application for change of zone to R-3 was originally heard by the
planning commission on January 15, 1985. It was continued until adoption
of the Palma Village Specific Plan. Since the specific plan recommends
that the entire block be rezoned to R-3 50, the original application has
been expanded to include all remaining R-2 parcels in the block. Of the
13 R-2 lots, 6 are vacant, 5 are developed with multi-family units and 2
are single family. The remaining 6 lots in the bl
ock are already zoned
R-3 and would only receive the Senior Housing designation.
11. ANALYSIS:
This area's existing pattern of development and its location adjacent to
San Pablo Avenue make it a high priority for rezoning which will hopefully
stimulate new project proposals.
111. RECOMMENDATION:
Approve findings and adopt Resolution No. recommending approval of
C/Z 84-19 to city council .
V1. ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution
2. Legal Notice
Prepared by ale L
Reviewed and Approved by
CITY Of PALM DESERT
CASE NO C/Z 84-19
We , the undersigned , are property owners within 300 feet
of the property on San Rafael that is requesting a zone _
change from R-2 to R-3 .
We are opposed to this change in zoning because it is our
opinion that the increase in density will negatively impact
our adjoining properties .
We respectfully request that this change in zoning not be
granted .
r party r s
Xam of w n e r 'S- i g n a t w er
Date :^( 2—
= �j
i
JAN 101985
CITY OF PALM DESERT
CASE NO C/Z 84-19
We , the undersigned , are property owners within 300 feet
of the property on San Rafael that is requesting a zone
change from R-2 to R-3 .
We are opposed to this change in zoning because it is our
opinion that the increase in density will negatively impact
our adjoining properties .
We respectfully request that this change in zoning not be
granted .
r—o—p—er-t-y-Ta d r e s s
ame o� Owner Signature of wner
Date : e
BAN lu 1985
CITY OF PALM DESERT
CASE NO C/Z 84-19
We , the undersigned , are property owners within 300 feet
of the property on San Rafael that is requesting a zone
change from R-2 to R-3 .We are opposed to this change in zoning because it is our
opinion that the increase in density will negatively impact
our adjoining properties .
We respectfully request that this change in zoning not be
granted .
ro erty A ress
me of ner S ' nat r of wner
Date : ��
JAN 91985
CITY OF PALM DESERT
CASE NO C/Z 84-19
We , the undersigned , are property owners within 300 feet
of the property on San Rafael that is requesting a zone —
change from R-2 to R-3 .
We are opposed to this change in zoning because it is our
opinion that the increase in density will negatively impact
our adjoining properties .
We respectfully request that this change in zoning not be
granted .
44' : -: ?- :,i ', ,cC w C e:
roperty ress i
ame of Owner Signature of wne'r
Date :
--r
JAN 9 1985
CITY OF PALM DESERT _.
CASE NO C/Z 84-19
We , the undersigned , are property owners within 300 feet
of the property on San Rafael that is requesting a zone
change from R-2 to R-3 .
We are opposed to this change in zoning because it is our
opinion that the increase in density will negatively impact
our adjoining properties .
We respectfully request that this change in zoning not be
granted .
���/�" �-c.-►� Cyr n ,C�
rop ty Address
GhrS
e o f—O w n e r t r SiOXture of owner
Date : �� O
CITY OF PALM D-ERT\
CASE NO C/Z 84-19/� 3� 7_. 3," i
We , the undersigned , are property owners within 300 feet
of the property on San Rafael that is requesting a zone
change from R-2 to R-3 .
We are opposed to this change in zoning because it is our
opinion that the increase in density will negatively impact
our adjoining properties .
We respectfully request that this change in zoning not be
granted .
3L5
� roperty � r—es s
Name of Uwner nature of wner
Date : "Ao5
CITY OF PALM DESERT
CASE NO C/Z 84-19
We , the undersigned , are property owners within 300 feet _
of the property on San Rafael that is requesting a zone
change from R-2 to R-3 .
We are opposed to this change in zoning because it is our
opinion that the increase in density will negatively impact
our adjoining properties .
We respectfully request that this change in zoning not be
granted.
t
Property Address
Dame of owner Signature ofOwner '
Date • / ='-
r�
CITY OF PALM DESERT
CASE NO C/Z 84-19
We the undersigned , are property owners within 300 feet
,of the property on San Rafael that is requesting a zone _
change from R-2 to R-3 .
We are opposed to this change in zoning because it is our
opinion that the increase in density will negatively impact
our adjoining properties .
We respectfully request that this change in zoning not be
granted .
30
(�roper^y Address
'Na*&We o wner Sign re of Owner
Date : , —
eo
625- I3 T R.A. /"t; $/7 5 2` NW 4 SW 4 SEC. 2/ T 55. R. 6 E
1*29►,/806
lest
THIS PLAT IS NOT A SURVEY. IT IS MRENDED 4 = /
AN AID IN LOCATING PROPERTY ONLY.
ALTHOUGH IT IS COMPILED FROM THE BEST C
SOURCES OF INFORMATION,THE COMPANY - sa DG,�
ASSUMES NO LIABILITY OF LOSS BY RELIANCE
THEREON. PASE�
r
I 1
I — a 0//
— —1 � P f+ A os
N8941 sc'_E 'ELs34� I W
/,r /00
Par
- 10PAI �Z
s 93
4r19,
-_'_ I16 -
' I f 14 . 0 61AC Nr ., ac of �- T R A 1828 Ba 9 1° as
.y
�t
— _ 4
/8 Q
E lit bT N O i�rd 30 y I 7 / - -
W D , 8/7 , C
1."ACNs V I TqA/ 3 ` so 11. .r, ;sit '�•� �4 -
o� 5• /6 0
M I I Q I TFA 'SO/
6�4 5 _ 21 22
rA('36/r0 3G2 GO PAI36//D
�.�! lit- h /2 /3
LARREA ST
TRA 829
24 I✓� 23 / d
TR7r1 O/ 3� t � 1 �' �
�f 76, t, f 2S
I low
_ t
1 a
/�
1 .:" O
.t rJv, a Ir L a
I ��c ley ._- • , I
_ 9 0 V r f!y"` t�,�;,1 f �7.ro •�.rn l4
1/•- 4 �J
22U1 `IOU -+
97
O 34Ac. r 4 " v • +�
® � � o r
f !
— _ 10
b / w
JA 4 e 5 / 6 � 7 �' 89I /Ohv// /2 /4�
0
_ WOOD - - - -- +
s /oo, ST
55'4j �z n°
1Z Fol 79.9"
p z 3
6
LQ
/72 G C t '� )
2 3 4 5 6 B �/ 7 g 9 ' /O // o /2 � v
4 `n as
—
75.41
�o AC
o' /73 - 'Z
2 � v
� I� N 24 � 23 22 2/ '2J i9 /g-i" /7 i 6 /5 d °
Q 4 l3 081�7-
� /4� �5 �j� i �I-/ �� A I�ae �'/ J2/ (2Z�. ;p� (24 , 3
- - -t ---- - --- ------— } ---- - -
.4 M CHICOR r ST.
QO. � S6 93 0 0 4
DATE OLD N.O. NEW NO.
7-3.6A 172-oo, ,�a-Bo C 33
411 w e„, a/ 2
/75 a4
/2 /1 O 9 9 7 �
- — o IR 6 O
C9) ro
I
7141 7 n
Q M /74 Q PAROSELL AT. 4
Z -- -- - - ---- -
J
v
�O to
" ASSESSOR'S AIAP 8K. 625 PG. 17
8. 22/75 Po/m Deserl Unit No. 4
IWERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF.
Coe ✓ULY 1967