The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSKYWARD WAY/CHIA DRIVE C/Z 02-82 1982 PRECISE PLAN_ . TENTATIVE TRACT ZONE CHANGE02---82- . PARCEL MAP � VARIANCE U.U.P. REFER TO: APPLICANT: r r of T' t/0 DE EJZ_r LOCKFION : s. o-" Sk �'�� W. of c 1 [ 0-* eas+ e� of REQUEST : 7e^e �� g-� 6 000 EXISTING ZONE: R'118.0 0 PREPARATION PROGRESS " DATE B : COMMENTS APPLICATION RECEIVED LEGAL PUBLICATION SENT 3-M-8z VJ H-16- PJ 5-7-OZ P �Z� Z NOTICES SENT PJ 3 - 'y JR 5-.�8 -n FIELD INVESTIGATION DEPTS. NOTIFIED O r:. BUILDING 0 _ ' ENGINEERING FIRE POLICE RECREATION & PARKS _ SCHOOL DISTRICT I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS _ FLOOD CONTROL j PRELIMINARY MEETING a STAFF REPORT FINAL PLAN APPROVAL PRECISE PLAN (6) ' I i, LANDSCAPING PLAN (5) PLAN. DIRECTOR MOD. (6) HEARINGS & ACTIONS ,I DATE ACTION VOTE REVIEW BOARD HEARING P.C. HEARING PUBLISHED ' P.C. PUBLIC HEARING ' I APPLICANT NOTIFIED C.C. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. RESOLUTION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE RECORDED FOR DATA- BANK- i f 4 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Negative Declaration TO: (X) Office of the County Clerk ( ) Secretary for Resources County of Riverside 1416 Ninth St., Rm 1311 4050 Main Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Riverside, CA 92501 FROM: CITY OF PALM DESERT 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 15083(f) of the State EIR Guidelines. Project Title/Common Name: C/Z 02-82, CITY OF PALM DESERT Date of Project Approval: June 10, 1982 State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted): N.A. Contact Person: Stan Sawa, Principal Planner Project Location: South side of Skyward Way, west of Chia Drive. Project Description: Change of zone from R-2, 8,000 to R-1, 8,000. This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project has been approved by the City; 2. The project ( ) will (X) will not have a significant effect on the environment; 3. An Environmental Impact Report was not prepared in connection with this project; and, 4. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at the above City Hall address. -7- l -$Z Date ORDINANCE NO. 303 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 107 OF THE PALM DESERT ZONING MAP. CASE NO. C/Z 02-82 The City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN, as follows: a s SECTION 1: That a portion of Ordinance No. 107 referencing Section 25.46.1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Map (Chapter 35.46 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code) is hereby amended to read as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 2: That a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is hereby approved. SECTION 3: The City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, California, is hereby directed to publish this ordinance in the Palm Desert Post, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Palm Desert, California, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Palm Desert City Council this 24th day of June, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: WILSON, McPHERSON, SNYDER, NEWBRANDER, PULUQI NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE OY I SON, Mayor ATTEST: , , SHEILA R. GILL GAN, City C City of Palm Desert, Califo /pa .. j t ��.� 17�• I I IK� ® I �I I I 1 I• •� =�•�• O � Q 41 \s a V11 VS •,1 - f ��j Ilbd�l \• \ •i a" I I Af-- —_—_ 0 C 00 iL - o o a > I ¢ ¢ v •h � t I M j - za a � SO Q I — i C A�• l b A Io !o Y _ Mo _ _ z0 W 0 001 1c in �-a e� } W le» 1 ' To cr c, O I a O ti ly J W � ti a•t v vi CITY CF PALM DESERT ORDI,JANCE NO. 303• icJ l - 055[� :ti`C June 10 & 24 , 1982 May 21, 1982 ' CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE ' CASE NO-C/Z 02-82 NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Residential Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: A.P.N. 630-190-012 mu L Ai SAID Public Hearing will be held on June 10,1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 27, 1982 /pa Bunche PALM DESERT CITY 14ALL _FPIBT,",nche DEPT. OF ENV:r?CNMENTAL SERVICES P. 0. BOX 1977 PALM DESERT CA 92261 'k 1-ft N 0 N to ,o Po�WaScIvoco TIAN Romjv G I�To F. Al A A, G ORDER 60 E.. 1)G" Aflu j UNA L E W")Ko I T TL ............................. -v LOT—AE HLND- -ErSGI, 15426- Swa low L,-ne 0 1982 tv in s t r. ca. 630-31�2—o 6 ECITY OF PALV SERVICES OESER7 May 21, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.C/Z 02-82 r NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert III City Council to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 1 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Residential Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: A.P.N. 630-190-012 Y, SAID Public Hearing will be held on June 10,1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 27, 1982 /pa Ralph Bunche PALM DESERT CITY HALL DEFT. OF EF:✓:RCMdENTAL SERVICES 1 P. O. £OX 1977 ^�\/I PALM DESERT, CA 92261 I_� 1 y 190r,i37111_ 06/D5/8 �A USA PETuy RETURN TO SENDER To"Fo NO DELTVI RAE:LE AS ADDRESSED N S441E9 . ® UNABLE.'. TO FORWARD " �. ; G3ti2-G12 `4C �n1 1 ; 7=-214 i rarci y 1982 I Ery vlf Pzl desert O �E, Ca.. 922GG �, • Nr GAG-3(i2—y y OF AFEA� Se,,, fS HIES N I .e M 4.4 n 0 May 21, 1982 ,wl . CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.C/Z 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Residential Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: �,. A.P.N. 630-190-012 1 �1 1 �+ I � r --Mar-- SAID Public Hearing will be held on June 10,1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 27, 1982 /pa , Ralph BunciTcl PAL^d D'SEST CITY HALL '.r . Agank DEPT. OF ENVlRCN F„ENTAL SERVICES P. 0. BOX 1977 N PALM DESERT, CA 92261 :.�„- ..: !p<VG USA 20c t I r n \ ......• ee eeueeaeev,ieeeaeeeaeseaaeivi Jlj / 19A2 U :3—vo7 o: er iloac ENVIRONMENT 3E palm Deser ^2260 Cf7Y OF PALM =s J DESn1 �QR1 NC;S n Pm 7ALWAYS Q USE ZIP CODE 1a�i May 21, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.C/Z 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Residential Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: A.P.N. 630-190-012 4. timM+n �, T e ,u i 7 �� //-'� � 0 ..•'" '�''��d -ate...'/ SAID Public Hearing will be held on June 10,1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 27, 1982 /pa MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 4, 1982 in the R-1, 10,000 zone located at 74-637 Peppertree Drive. Mr. Joy reviewed the staff report and recommended approval. Vice Chairman Richards asked for a clarification on what hardships this has created for the applicant. Mr. Diaz explained most of the homes in the neighborhood were built prior to these setback requirements with a 5' minimum side yard setbacks. Therefore, the requested variance could be justified. Vice Chairman Richards opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant cared to make a presentation. MR. STEVE SULLIVAN, Architect, 73-730 Hwy 111, stated he was present for any questions the Commission might have. Commissioner Miller asked what the setbacks in front of the property would be. Mr. Sullivan replied they would be the same as required in the R-1 10,000 zone. Vice Chairman Richards asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Moved by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to adopt the findings as recommended by staff. Carried unanimously 4-0. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 799, approving VAR 01-82. Carried unanimously 4-0. D. Case No. C/Z 02-82 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Consideration of a Change of Zone from R-2 8,000 to R-1 8,000 (Single Family Residential, 8,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size) for property located south of Skyward Way, between Chia Drive and the easterly end of Bel Air Road. Mr. Smith reviewed the staff report and stated that this property had previously been rezoned from R-1 10,000 to R-2 8,000, which presently is inconsistent with the General Plan. Staff is recommending approval. Vice Chairman Richards opened the public hearing and asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Miller, to adopt findings as recommended by staff. Carried unanimously 4-0. Commissioner Wood, at this time, explained to the audience that this matter was brought up at the study session prior to the meeting and Commissioners thoroughly weighed the pros and cons of this act. Moved o ed by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Miller, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 800, recommending approval of C/Z 02-82. Carried unanimously 4-0. E. Case No. ZOA 04-82 CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Consideration of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment relating to nonconforming lots, buildings, uses and land. Mr. Diaz stated that because staff would need to contact property owners that would be impacted by this request, he is recommending a continuance to June 1st.' -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 800 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE. CASE NO. C/Z 02-82 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of May, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single Family, 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for .� property located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: 7 APN 630-190-012 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: 1. The land use resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with adjacent proposed land uses. 2. The density resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with densities permitted in the adjacent areas. 3. The proposed Change of Zone would be compatible with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of I ! Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of a Change of Zone from R-2 8,000 to R-1 8,000 as shown on attached Exhibit "A". 3. That a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is hereby recommended for certification. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of May, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, MILLER, WOOD, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: KRYDER ABSTAIN: NONE f GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa City of Palm Desert Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: May 4, 1982 CASE NO: C/Z 02-82 REQUEST: Change of Zone from ,R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single Family, 8,000 ,-square foot minimum size lot for a previously approved 36 unit planned residential development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Be] Air Road. APPLICANT: City of Palm Desert I. BACKGROUND: A. HISTORY: In 1979 a project calling for the construction of 36 single family residences was presented to the City. Tentative Tract Map 14999 was prepared and eventually approved. The Tentative Tract Map provided for 36 lots on which a single family dwelling would be placed on each. Two additional lots were delineated on the Tentative Tract Map on which recreational facilities and a Private street were proposed. In order to have the common recreational facilities a Conditional Use Permit was required. The applicant was also required to file an application to rezone the property from R-1, 10,000 to R-2 8,000. Why the change of zone to R-2 8,000 was required is not known but recreational facilities are a permitted use in an R-1 zone subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. Ordinance 214 changing the zoning of the subject property was adopted by City Council October 25, 1979. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North - R-1 - 13,000/Single Family Dwellings South - P.R-3/Vacant East - R-1 - 10,000/Vacant West - R-1 - 13,000/Single Family Dwellings C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: Residential - Low Density, 3-5 units/acre. II. ANALYSIS.- A. FINDINGS: The R-2 8,000 zoning permits the creation of minimum 8,000 square foot lots and permits one unit for every 4,000 square feet of net lot area. A Development of this type and density would be inconsistent with the General Plan Land Use Element which designates this area Residential Low Density (ie: 3 to 5 units per acre). The R-2 zone, allowing one unit for every 4,000 square feet of lot area would net a maximum of 9 units per acre after streets are established. The nine (9) unit per acre maximum is well in excess of the maximum permitted by General Plan (ie: 5 unit maximum/acre). _ 1 _ CASE NO. C/Z 02-82 MAY 4, 1982 A. FINDINGS (CONTINUED): At this time any development of the property is controlled by the Conditional Use Permit which limits the property to be developed with a single family dwelling. However, should the owner choose to let the Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Map expire, then he would be left with a parcel of land (some 11.2 acres) zoned R-2, 8,000 permitting one unit for every 4,000 square feet of net lot area which could result in up to 103 units on the site. B. PROPOSED ZONING: In order to comply with the state law requiring consistency between the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and in order that the City does not in the future have to process a multifamily development plan for 103 units on this site, it is suggested that the property be rezoned from R-2 8,000 to R-1 8,000, which would limit the development to single family residences on minimum lot sizes of 8,000 square feet. The 8,000 square foot minimum lot size would mean that all the lots created by Tentative Map 14999, should it be finaled, would continue to comply. Zoning the site R-1 8,000 would also be consistent with the General Plan designation of Low Density (3-5 units per acre). C. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the proposed zone change will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on reasons delineated in the report, staff recommends approval of Resolution No. " A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, recommending to the City Council approval of a Change of Zone from R-2 8,000 to R-1 8,000 for property located south of Skyward Place west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road". V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution. B. Legal Notice. C. Initial Study and Draft Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact. Prepared by: ! �. r Reviewed and Approved By: /pa - 2 - • i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. #fill A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE. CASE NO. C/Z 02-82 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of May, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-I (8,000), Single Family, 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for property located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: APN 630-190-012 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedure for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: 1. The land use resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with adjacent proposed land uses. 2. The density resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with densities permitted in the adjacent areas. 3. The proposed Change of Zone would be compatible with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of a Change of Zone from R-2 8,000 to R-1 8,000 as shown on attached Exhibit "A". 3. That a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is hereby recommended for certification. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of May, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa April 15, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. C/Z 02-92 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Residential Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: APN 630-190-012 1- -" _Jw'-.i,._:-li=ir�..�j': ' - Imo• '' � l fix= - ii•�C�:-?--F.-r=;�• 1 17.�eS� SAID Public Hearing will be held on May 4, 1982, at 7:00 p,m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post April 22, 1982 /pa 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 63 Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code) Case No: C/Z 02-82 Common Project Name (if any): N/A Applicant/Project Sponsor: City of Palm Desert Project Description/Location: Proposed Change of Zone from R-2, 8,000 to R-1 8,000, Single Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for property located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road. The Director of the Department of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. As— r� R ON A. DIAZ DAT Director of Environmental Servires RAD/pa r' CASE NO. ENVIAODPIENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONIMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST n NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets) . Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: F / a. Unstable earth conditions. or in changes in geologic substructures? _ b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction, or _ ✓ overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief ✓ features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ ✓ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of sails, either on or off the site? ✓ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? ✓ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ _ ✓ 21 Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a... Changes in currents, 'or the course or direction of water movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? _ _ _✓ c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of.the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ✓ e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- ✓ wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass , and crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? , c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal ✓ replenishment of existing species? _ _ _ 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles, or insects)? vl� b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? ✓ c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier- to the migration or movement of animals? _ _ _V/ d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? �/ 3. Yes Mt be No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in :.the rate of use of any natural / resources? V/ b. Depletion of:any non-renewable natural resource? 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.deselopment of new sources of ✓ energy? 8. Risk of Upset:#;Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides , oil , chemicals, or radiation) in / the event of an accident or upset conditions? V 1c — — — 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and / improvements endangered by flooding? V b. A change in the value of property and impro-,ementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toAhe point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? 11. Land Use. Will athe proposal result in the a t—T eration of the present developed or — —planned land use of an area? V/ 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theramount of designated open / space? V 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of the location, distribution , density, or growth rate of the human Population of- the City? _ b. Change in the population distribution by age, income, 4•eligion, racial , or ethnic / h. group, occupational class, household type? — ✓— 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Employment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? _ b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a / demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? V b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? _ _ ✓ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation / or movement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , ✓ bicyclists , or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ _ ✓ b. Police protection? _ _ ✓ c. Schools? ._ _ _ ✓ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? _ _ e. Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? f. Other governmental services? i 1\' 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a:- Power or- natural gas? b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? V/ e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21 . Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view s open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area ) attractiveness, pleasantness , -- / and uniqueness? V 23. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new ighi--t or glare? 24. Ar_ch�eol.oy_ical/Historical . Will the proposal result in an a teeration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? �/ f r. 6. Yes Maybe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail / the diversity in the environment? _ _ _ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental .goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into J the future. ) _ _ c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) _ d. Does the project have environmental effects / which will cause substantial adverse effects ✓/ on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: s-50G9A-T� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Division 6, Article 7, Section 15083, of the California Administrative Code) Case No: C/Z 02-82 Common Project Name (if any): N/A Applicant/Project Sponsor: City of Palm Desert Project Description/Location: Proposed Change of Zone from R-2, 8,000 to R-1 8,000, Single Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for property located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road. The Director of the Department of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects, may also be found attached. R ON A. DIAZ DAT Director of Environmental Servi es RAD/pa CASE N0. C/Z off,-82 ENVIAON.1tXTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIROMMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No 1 . Earth. Will the proposal result in: , / a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in _ _ +� geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements , compaction, or _ _ ✓ overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief ✓ features? d. The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ ✓ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ _ _✓ 2. Air. Will .the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? ✓ c. Alteration of air movement , moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ _ ✓ • E 2, Yes Maybe No 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a.. Changes in currents, "or the course or �. direction of water' movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ✓ C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of-the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ✓ e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, J either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? — — — 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in- a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass , and crops)? ►/ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? , c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal ✓ replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal. Life. Will the proposal 'result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds , land animals including reptiles, or ✓ insects)? — — b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? ✓ c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier. to / the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife ✓ . habitat? 3. Yes M�be No 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in .•the rate of use of any natural / resources? r -- — b. Depletion ofaany non-renewable natural j resource? 7. End. Will the proposal result in: JZ a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? — ✓ b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the.development of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of Upset: iDoes the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of ' hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides , oil , chemicals, or radiation) in / the event of an accident or upset conditions? V lc — — — 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: J. a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? ✓ b. A change in the value of property and impro•�ementsrexposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? V 10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels toe:the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are / exceeded? i V 11. Land Use. Willethe proposal result in the a t-T eration of the present developed or planned land use of an area? V - 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in theramount of designated open / space? V 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteraticn of` the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of- the Citv? — — — b. Change in the population distribution by r age, income,=4-eligion, racial , or ethnic / group, occupational class, household type? — —✓ 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Emoloyment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? _ _ — 15. Housing. Will. the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing 9 P 9 units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner-occupied and rental , etc. ) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a / demand for additional housing? _ _ — 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? V b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation / or mcvement of people and/or goods? e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? _ b. Police protection? _ — c. Schools? _ _ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? .. 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public Fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: -- -a Power or- natural gas? _ b. Communications system? _ c. Water? L/ d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? V/ f. Solid waste and disposal ? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? _ V b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased demand for provision of general social services? 22. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in: a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? v b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness , pleasantness , -- -- / and uniqueness? V 23. Li ht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 24. Arch�eol.o�ical/Historical . Will the proposal result in an a te�l ration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, / object, or building? k/ q � T 6. Yes aLbe No 25. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into J V/ the future. ) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment , / is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects / which will cause substantial adverse effects ✓/ on human beings , either directly or indirectly? Initial Study Prepared By: /4s s o ct A-T6� PROOF OF PUBLICATION (20109 2015.5 CCP) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF C1Z 02-82 C/Z 02-82 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the } County aforesaid ; I am over the t age of eighteen years, and not N" a Party to or interested in the ao;Ej X; s'a *'cn above entitled matter. I am the ��08 principal clerk of the printer of THE DESERT POSTS +�aas a newspaper of general circula- e "m iY tionn printed and published weekly o�Do ( .:� � `"• +; v in the city of Riversides County of Riversides and which newspaper t°a' ( i has been adjudged a newspaper of am „ general circulation by the «a$ It +p� A Superior Court of the County of w mw1; Riversides State of Californian "9Zo0to under date of October 5s 1964s %N= fo„ o,m •• Case number 83658; that the Jz �oN, DZ notices of which the annexed is dazaquu II J a printed copy# has been published owJQw�oado I„a cam - in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit : moo, 3 JQ w`Cy0 r``•� _ _• 04122 91982 ��•- _�_ a e wgES�r E8„ag u T Certify (or declare) under pca ;a I I I penalty Qo�ze- of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. aBEn 'a ova Dated April 229 1962 at Rivers ides California � J CITY OF PALM DESERT May 7, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO.C/Z 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Residential Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: A.P.N. 630-190-012 ' I _ I i puF I +,:�'��,^" I C'�y��fl •.f .ir-`�•'1 •ITS I SAID Public Hearing will be held on May 27, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City 'Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk City of Palm Desert, California PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post May 13, 1982 /pa April 15, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. C/Z 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Resid ntial Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the ,easterly end of Bel Ain`,'I2oadj;mocg particularly described as: j P APN 630-190-012 i („n.D'1"d'h IrDiOYimC71L i+;••i•�r7_ei— .^4.' —' I �i`�3mmCDiK�"1 I I .. u ��. -:J` .. U ill '.•r '. �i .lass. SAID Public Hearing will be held on May 4, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post April 22, 1982 /pa DcJcRT CITY HALL DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE,. _ P. 0. BOX 1977 PALM DESERT, CA 92261 EiOL. 14 19Z/3 NI. RETURN URN 10 SENDER NOT DEL1V4PABLE AS ADURE:WED I9JAW 1;p FORWAIND .. .... Pair, Desert, Ca. 92260 fNviRDN I98? G ,G-302 � L-j CI N Op At SfR � OfSFRTfS YS 24 APR J ry N ri V III April 15, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. C/Z 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Residential Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: APN 630-190-012 max_- }�iZC •=�j—�"— ir 1L LLaQC9�G�;�ie_➢�-^. J Jai ,., 0 ,.% •., i ;�:�' �� . � SAID Public Hearing will be held on May 4, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post April 22, 1982 /pa Rio-ZDC 0-0 < CC9Z: 4✓ ��7�Sit2T•Z�5a i aucZ noliEng OZ'79T 1a3s3a a?.3,0'Ii t'iF7/7g l lqu s301Aa3 W-'Vd d0 A110 3WNOalAN3 Z9616 Z tJdb' r�Q� =r'I.�b r � ' cry N.. 'f�n.'t 2:3v i9ZZ6 tl0 '1N3S3a WTfd • h:1Ff„ ,5 '� LL6T X08 •0 'd S301AOS IVIfI3WNOL'If�Li 30 •1d3C JIVN A110 10'? ::i\J , 1 n � 1 s April 15, 1982 CITY OF PALM-DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. C/Z 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Residential Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: APN 630-190-012 ILn�=aC. SAID Public Hearing will be held on May 4, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post April 22, 1982 /pa P1U.6I D::zERr crrY HALL OEFIT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES P. O. BOX 1977 W rub PALM DESERT, CA 97261 ro y NOfR fXP FIOR�QING •ii ............. .veane aee..... oees.cL':Y 73-067 So< _ra Road Palm re rt, Ca. 92260 £N�,R 0198 (: f-3uZOO C p M 2 N TL YppPCMDfRV�f� April 15, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. C/Z 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before t'he Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 8,000 square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Residential Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: APN 630-190-012 Ijl1 71 Irnuam=vim !� .- ^s-� % rT-„ 1 SAID Public Hearing will be held on May 4, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post April 22, 1982 /pa EUG"P/,OXR6AUT kAY -- ' CLAY:UUIZV IT:G ST?7�;:':"S, LTD: }DARK/SYLVIA DA OVICH 7�-UZO 'Iomestead Road • ; 73-137 Sonera Poad 1305 1%0. Padonia Ave. Pali Desert, Ca. 921260 Palm Desert, Ca. 9221,Q GI:ittier, Ca: 90603 r3C:-190-i)C6 630-302-006 630-302 017 a,, , ,,, , ,,, ,,,,,, , ,, ,,,,,,,,,'•��LA;;%SYLw'I: tIi.' a�; '.,, , ., . ., yy-- i �., GCO L. 1� z/:icCallur; AIFORD CO , ` 73-163 Sor:era Road [.N VEF-ST Ti'v, w Pu1r: i�iT•• 922C•2 Pall:; Desert, Ca. 22G�. %4--J :1 Pc:ueO .,Elite A y ° -3,'"-G•`7 ?aln; Des a. 922C>> It: —" 3sI. ,i l,C 1 { r / ':I i'.i:`i ZFiI.LS I. G 73-6�-0- Q, - - Trail 7 73-1 5 Sor-,era road 73-G�:1 El Pasco Palm - , 9^7_G0 i'alt.:'Desert, Ca. 97 60 Pal,; Desert, Ca. 922601 220-002 630-302-019 f•uU E a S'ACI2E .• "�P,CI.'i 1ii T Iuiuitz/G cCallurt j,"': t r OII% Yn : Pale: SprinC.s, Ca. 92262 73 'll Sonera load 137 l . Pal;:, Desert, Ca, 92260 a, ,� G24> 630-190-013 ; 630-3302•-001) C _-1320 .. ,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,, ,,,,,, TI OF PAL1 DLS�I:T : I'.L'r> Y/RUTI: S'.'SIIT�II.'..!\ i:I( I.t`.FU/S!1liR01 KITE :cos fice 30� 7 ' 73-23? Sonera Toad 73-()15 Skyward Way 1r. Dese :a. 922Gtj ; i'aZi Desert, Ca. 9226G Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 G L -0-025 : 630--302-010 630-303-001 i �'iACE r.CLDII:C, LTD. ; :ilia:/ELI?�GrFTII CHA%L1ii3O : �•I ' LEOI'.A/..ICTUhEL zmmriT c, o ` 'ICE ? r�LPll/i LL'!: iz1l. CRUUI; i64) i)r 27.44 Lansdoia;ie road Lr• : ?3-234 Sk;naard ::'ay `danco r nada VGTi;7 = r��rr Victoria BC Canada .: palm Desc..rt, Ca. ,t. ,� ) G" 9C-03U ; 630-302-011 63Q_3.03-1?0,2_ ., , UDRE SINGS : DOx ALD/SALLY VIOLIC.I: i�OI'E:.RT/St'�.R1001 "EI STEINI 730ll r ad F KFE F-,Y SE.LI�Y, 73-065 Skyward :lay Palm D t, 92260 ' 73-224 Skyward ;day ; Pain Desert, Ca. 92250 ^^� : Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 G30-3Q3 L. U- \, -5 :,1 • G3 -3G -01 a > 0-3 ............ U1;,":L'JJ' 11S ", `i D:Zi.'O' )0;.`.6sLI)/BUNITe`. $JLaS /S'_lil.liGi< YLUTi:IF 73 3 So;;;era I:oari ; 73-214 Skye?arG Way 3325 ty good ialm i t ;22G0 ; Palm. Desert, Ca. 92260 Studio Cit 91604° �30- -OC2 G3G-30;L-.Q1,3 ; �39 -OU4 •.........nee.s.n.ne,se.nn+nea ne o.na..aa .........................,a 1zA-RRY1GLO121!_ IATUTER -, 15YUi:T C. I�� O:: ; 73-067 Soeiera f nad , 3Ot-illg AI?CARLT CADY : 73-102 Skyward Gray 545 W. Lambert Road Palm Desert, Ca. 92200 *, Palm Desert, Ca. 922610 ;srea, Ca. 92621 � 63O-3U2-C?03 ` STtu:"t'G1i'%?•`A Y"ELLE.1; G�tYLF.. O RNIF :1E 'S UD h �itS °gib}'j 'i3i ��i:.... ......... .. >� ; CI.AY:'UUii`t,Is I:IVi�ST;�.-.;:'i., j' c/o ST ii:TU;': GAYLE : P U. Bor 1159 73-032 Bel Air Road 73-0>,7 Soulera Road : Desert :Dot Sprin;s, Ca. Pali Desert, Ca. 92260 Desert, Ca. 92260 92240 t 63L`-303- ^� 630-3G'-SII-5 -." - y _ ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,>.,.,,.,.>,,,,>,.J.,.,,..,>.,;..>a,,..,no,,,n,nse,.o.v, ,,.,.,e,r, ..or.'>a .a>>.,.,-.,,,o).>, ,..,,.,.x.,. ,,>,,., uo„ s :;Ui<SUELO ROSEN ROPFRT/C1t1=L0TTI; HE1;DEi:SOt: r LILLIAN SCALE ' 73-111 Sonera load ; 15420- Swallow Lane 73-6?Q raii iai::; Desert, Ca. 92260 : ,"estninster, Ca • 1i2vv) Pal... D ' ; `�� 92260 '30-362-005 1630-302-016 c -22��U01 Mr. James J. Nugent 806 Foothills South Tower 1315 0 29th STN W Calgary, Alberta, CAN T2N2T8 Mr. & Mrs. Richard C. Sloane 73-014 Be] Air Road Palm Desert, CA 92260 Ms. Evelyn Siemen 73-271 Buckborad Trail Palm Desert, CA 92260 Mr. Mehta Ashok 73-291 Buckborad Trail Palm Desert, CA 92260 Mr. Earl P. Grant 73-280 Buckboard Trail Palm Desert, CA 92260 Ms. Lois R. Jensen 73-296 Buckborad Trail Palm Desert, CA 92260 Mr. & Mrs. Robert A. Nugent 10780 Rosetti Court Richamond, BC Canada. V7E 487 L.Q.D. INC. 600 Tahquitz-McCallum Way Palm Springs , CA 92262 r— INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A ONE YEAR TIME DATE: APRIL 6, 1982 EXTENSION AND INITIATION OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-2, 8,000 TO R-1, FOR CASE NO. TT 14999 (WESTSIDE ENTERPRISES), ALSO KNOWN AS SKYWARD PLACE. Tentative Map 14999 calls for the creation of 36 single family dwelling lots. In addition two more lots; one for common recreation facilities and the other for the street are delineated on the map. The property is located at the easterly end of Bel Air Road between Skyward Way and Homestead Road and is zoned R-2 - 8,000. The subject map was originally approved October 11, 1979. In January, 1981, an 18 month time extension was granted which expires April 12, 1982, ( the 18 month time extension was retroactively effective to October 12, 1980). Pursuant to the recent revisions to the Subdivision Ordinance, the applicant is requesting an additional one year extension to the tentative map. As noted previously the property is zoned R-2 8,000. This zoning permits one unit for every 4,000 square feet of lot area and requires a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet. Considering that the intent was to create a single family subdivision, staff feels that the zoning is in error and a change of zone should be processed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That Planning Commission continue the request for a one year time extension to TT 14999 and direct staff to process a Change of Zone for the subject property from R-2, 8,000 to R-1 8,000. /pa March 18, 1982 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE CASE NO. C/Z 02-82 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Change of Zone from R-2 (8,000) to R-1 (8,000), Single-Family 8,000 Square foot minimum lot size for a previously approved 36 unit Planned Residential Development located south of Skyward Way, west of Chia Road at the easterly end of Bel Air Road, more particularly described as: APN 630-190-012 I -Ilk, SAID Public Hearing will be held on April 6, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers in the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission PUBLISH: Palm Desert Post March 25, 1982 /pa PROOF OF PUBLICATION (20101 2015 .5 CCP) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF LEGAL NOTICE CIL 02- I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid : I am over the age of eighteen years and not - a party to or interested :in the - - i,_ "Au'diovo><3 Bldupmkt above entitled matter. I am the Come To: NOTICE IS HEREBY ! principal clerk Of the printer Planning Commission io car o f T H E DESERT P O S T, a,aoo SWwe toot mmlmum l AUTO SOUND' ment located south of SkV a newspaper of general c'ircula- part�ACPINrI�dj�INZedas:- : 73O88Hwy. 111,P.D. I tiont printed and published weekly 568-3664 in the city of Riversides County of Riversides and which newspaper 1 has been adjudged a newspaper of j __� I i DESERT general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of BUSINESS Riverside, State of California * l f MACHINES under date of October 5s 19649 Case number 83658; that the INC. notices of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published N SALE•SERVICE•SUPPUES, in each regular and entire issue �> TYPEWRITER of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following REPAIR dates to-wits • t.p,.. au-es; SAID Public Hearingy wl i wrh,n Sae Pablo P.D all I nteerrest ied Cpersons ItV Hall,4 e W • C k m MbI1N 03/2.5 11982 I RAMON A. DIAZ secretar, .Palm Desert P6nln9 C — I Certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, Dated March 25s 1982 at Riverside, California -Z---�__�,�- - ------- CITY OF PALM DESERT