The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2021-07-13 ARC Regular Meeting MinutesCITY OF PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JULY 13, 2021 — 12:30 P.M. ZOOM VIRTUAL MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Van Vliet called the meeting to order at 12:31 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Commissioners Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Chris Van Vliet, Chair X 1 0 Karel Lambell, Vice Chair X 1 0 Nicholas Latkovic X 1 0 Michael McAuliffe X 1 0 Jim McIntosh (Left the meeting at 3:30 p.m.) X 1 0 Juan Mireles X 1 0 John Vuksic X 1 0 Also Present: Eric Ceja, Deputy Director of Development Services Rosie Lua, Senior Planner Nick Melloni, Associate Planner Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner Melinda Gonzalez, Recording Secretary Associate Planner, Kevin Swartz, advised there were two new commissioners appointed to the Architectural Review Commission (ARC). At the request of Mr. Swartz, both Commissioner Latkovic and Commissioner Mireles introduced themselves and provided a brief summary of their professional background. III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Associate Planner, Kevin Swartz, invited comments from attendees on items not on the Agenda, to which there were none. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JULY 13, 2021 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of June 22, 2021. Rec: Approve as presented. Upon a motion by Chair Van Vliet, seconded by Commissioner McAuliffe, and a 7-0 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, the minutes for June 22, 2021 were approved as presented. (AYES: Lambell, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Mireles, Van Vliet and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None). V. CASES It should be noted, associated staff reports, memos, attachments and discussion on the following items can be viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at, httos://www.citvofoalmdesert.ora/our-citv/committees- and-commissions/architectural-review-commission-information-center. A. FINAL DRAWINGS 1. CASE NO: MISC 21-0016 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a wall exception (material) for a 5-foot high wood fence and gate located on the side yard facing the public right-of-way. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Pamela Prest, Palm Desert, CA 92260 LOCATION: 73441 Little Bend Trail ZONE: R-1, 10,000 Associate Planner, Kevin Swartz, presented the item. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Upon a motion by Vice Chair Lambell, seconded by Commissioner McIntosh, and a 7-0 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, Case No. MISC 21-0016, was approved subject to the following: 1) Wood fence and gate will be maintained by property owner no less than twice a year including staining and treatment of the wood, as necessary, to avoid warping and deterioration; and 2) Any subsequent code violations regarding the gate and fence shall result in a second review by the ARC for continued approval of the wall exception. (AYES: Lambell, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Mireles, Van Vliet and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None). 2. CASE NO: MISC 21-0020 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a facade enhancement to an existing retail commercial storefront for Jeffrey Allen Salon. 2 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JULY 13, 2021 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: One Eleven El Paseo, LLC, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 LOCATION: 73580 El Paseo, Suite D ZONE: DO Commissioner McAuliffe advised the Commission he would be recusing himself from this item due to a conflict of interest as he is a consultant for Jeffrey Allen Salon and will be presenting the item. Associate Planner, Nick Melloni, presented the item. Mr. Melloni turned the presentation over to Michael McAuliffe, applicant, who provided further details on the project presentation. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments on the project's design. Upon a motion by Commissioner McIntosh, seconded by Commissioner Vuksic, and a 6-0 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, Case No. MISC 21-0020, was approved subject to the following: 1) Landscaping shall be compatible with the surrounding area landscaping and shall be reviewed by Planning staff. (AYES: Lambell, Latkovic, McIntosh, Mireles, Van Vliet and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: McAuliffe). 3. CASE NO: MISC 21-0017 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a wall exception (height and setback) for a 5-foot high masonry block wall located within 8 feet of the curb face in the front yard of an existing single-family residence. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: American Heritage Pool Corporation, Palm Desert, CA 92255. LOCATION: 45820 Mountain View Avenue ZONE: R-1 Associate Planner, Nick Melloni, presented the item. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Upon a motion by Commissioner McIntosh, seconded by Vice Chair Lambell, and a 7-0 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, Case No. MISC 21-0017, was continued subject to the following: 1) Provide a more detailed plan and rendering which accurately reflect proposed materials and overall request; 2) Redesign the wall to incorporate more design interest through the inclusion of materials which are compatible with the existing home, increase the undulation to break up the plane of the wall, and potentially add a decorative wall cap; and 3) Consider options to increase the wall setback from the curb face such as modifying the pool size, and shape to allow for more conformance to requirements of the Fence and Wall Ordinance (Palm Desert Municipal Code 25.40.080). (AYES: Lambell, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Mireles, Van Vliet and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None). 3 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JULY 13, 2021 4. CASE NO: SARC 21-0008 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request to install a new awning with neon signage for Mimmo's Italian Restaurant and Bar. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Riofine Neon, Cathedral City, CA 92234 LOCATION: 73540 Highway 111, Suite #4 ZONE: DO Associate Planner, Nick Melloni, presented the item. Mr. Melloni noted this item started as a code compliance case as the owner did not obtain a permit or City approval for modifications made to the awning to accommodate an expansion of the restaurant. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Upon a motion by Vice Chair Lambell, seconded by Commissioner McIntosh, and a 7-0 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, Case No. SARC 21-0008, was continued subject to the following: 1) Break up the awning length, avoid a single uninterrupted length of awning; 2) Explore other options for awning including material, style and design; 3) Revisit neon sign and consider options which incorporate a more artful design; and 4) Provide more detailed plans and renderings. (AYES: Lambell, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Mireles, Van Vliet and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None). B. PRELIMINARY PLANS 1. CASE NO: MISC 21-0019 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for architectural elevations and a landscape plan for 196 units; 64 duplex units, 84 cluster units, 48 single-family homes, and a recreation building. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Lennar Homes, Corona, CA 92879 LOCATION: University Park TTM 36342 ZONE: PR-18 Associate Planner, Kevin Swartz, presented the item. Mr. Swartz introduced the applicant who provided a detailed presentation for the project. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Upon a motion by Vice Chair Lambell, seconded by Commissioner Vuksic, and a 7-0 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, Case No. MISC 21- 0019, was continued subject to the following: 1) Windows for all plans should be recessed; 2) Avoid the use of elevated landscaping; 3) Pot shelves should not be used in place of architecture; 4) Enhanced features should be provided for all street exposed lots; 5) Revisit material for fascia detail, avoiding the use of wood; 6) Walls for porches and Recreation Center should be thicker; 7) 4 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JULY 13, 2021 Consider a change in plane between top and bottom of home for Desert Prairie plan; 8) Revisit brick elements throughout all plans; 9) Provide illustration which includes venting and solar panels to demonstrate how they interact with proposed roof's architecture; 10) Revisit color palette, specifically "Stark White"; and 11) Tree selection should be mature and durable enough to withstand high wind exposure. (AYES: Lambell, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Mireles, Van Vliet and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None). 2. CASE NOS: PP 20-0010/TPM 38033/CZ and GPA 20-0002 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval a 48-unit condominium project on four acres at the southwest corner of Portola Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive. The project includes a Change of Zone from five (5) dwelling units per acre to twelve (12) dwelling units per acre, a General Plan Amendment, a Precise Plan application, Tentative Parcel Map 38033, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration for environmental purposes. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Desert Luxury Apartments, Las Vegas, NV 89121 LOCATION: 36000 Shepherd Lane ZONE: PR-5 Commissioner McIntosh excused himself from the meeting at this time due to a conflicting scheduled obligation. Commissioner McAuliffe advised the Commission he would be recusing himself due to a conflict of interest as he is a part of the advisory team for this item. Associate Planner, Kevin Swartz, presented the item. Mr. Swartz noted this item was brought before the Commission at the Architectural Review Commission meeting held May 25, 2021. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Upon a motion by Commissioner Vuksic, seconded by Commissioner Mireles, and a 5-0 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, Case No. PP 20-0010/TPM 38033/CZ and GPA 20-0002, was approved subject to the following: 1) Consider extending parapet ends 18 to 24 inches on two-story roof plan. (AYES: Lambell, Latkovic, Mireles, Van Vliet and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: McAuliffe, McIntosh). 3. CASE NO: PP 19-0006 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission to approve a new single -story, 3,452 square -foot residential duplex. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Kola Olatunbosun, Palm Desert, CA 92260 5 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JULY 13, 2021 LOCATION: 73721 San Nicholas Way ZONE: R-2 Associate Planner, Nick Melloni, presented the item. Mr. Melloni noted this will be the commission's third review of this item. Mr. Melloni stated the project is a significant improvement to the previously proposed plan and is overall a good design, therefore, staff recommended approval of the project as presented. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Upon a motion by Vice Chair Lambell, seconded by Commissioner Vuksic, and a 6-0 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, Case No. PP 19-0006, was continued subject to the following: 1) Consider adding and/or extending overhangs to avoid runoff along the building walls; 2) Chimney on elevation should be revised to reflect the rendering; 3) An interior roof drain should be added for drainage on eyebrows; 3) All windows on the north elevation should be recessed; 4) Replace the existing east and west fences with a new fence or wall material which is permitted by the Palm Desert Municipal Code. (AYES: Lambell, Latkovic, McAuliffe, Mireles, Van Vliet and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: McIntosh). C. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS 1. SELECTION of Ad -Hoc Subcommittee Member for Lupine Plaza. Associate Planner, Kevin Swartz, advised the Commission, during the pandemic, City Council authorized the temporary closure of a portion of Lupine Lane to allow the setup of tables and chairs for public use. City Council has directed staff to solicit proposals for the purpose of permanently closing this portion of Lupine Lane to create an outdoor plaza area. The Request for Proposals (RFP), is requesting services for Architecture, Engineering and Landscaping. City Council has authorized the City to create an Ad Hoc Subcommittee once the RFP has been awarded. The subcommittee will be comprised of a member from City Council, Parks and Recreation Commission, Art in Public Places, City Staff, Architectural Review Commission, Planning Commission, and members of the public from surrounding businesses. Deputy Director of Development Services, Eric Ceja, advised it is anticipated the subcommittee will meet approximately three times to provide comments on design and be champions for the project. At the request of several Commissioners this item was deferred to the next meeting to allow Commissioners time to consider volunteering for the subcommittee. 2. Member Update Form and Ethics Training for Commissioners Recording Secretary, Melinda Gonzalez, advised the Commission they were provided an annual Member Update Form which requests their most current contact information. Commissioners were requested to complete and return these forms to the recording secretary at the next meeting or by email. Additionally, Mrs. Gonzalez advised Commissioners are required to complete ethics training and will be receiving an email from the recording secretary with 6 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION JULY 13, 2021 a link to complete the required two hour minimum ethics training. At the conclusion of the ethics training, Commissioners will receive a certificate of completion. Commissioners were requested to print, sign and provide the certificate of completion to the recording secretary at the next meeting or by email. VI. COMMENTS Former ARC Commissioner, Allan Levin, took an opportunity to say a proper goodbye after twelve years on the Commission. All Commissioners thanked Mr. Levin for his time as an ARC Commissioner. Mr. Levin also commented cases such as Lennar on today's agenda, which require substantial time, should have their own meeting. Commissioner Vuksic requested City staff try to avoid allowing incomplete and/or inaccurate submittals to be presented to the Commission. VII. ADJOURNMENT With the Architectural Review Commission concurrence, Chair Van Vliet adjourned the meeting at 4:32 p.m. Eric Ceja, Secietary r I n > l A fM"L"1i Melinda Gonzalez, Recording Sectary 7