HomeMy WebLinkAboutCalifornia Voting Rights Act (CVRA) Select Dist Boundarry Maps for General Election 2020STAFF REPORT
CITY OF PALM DESERT
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
MEETING DATE: March 12, 2020
PREPARED BY: Lauri Aylaian, City Manager
REQUEST: Conduct the third public hearing on creation of voting districts,
receiving community input on the draft Council district boundary
maps; select one of the proposed, population -compliant maps of
district boundaries or provide direction for staff to develop a
different map that meets the desired criteria; and confirm the
current proposed election sequencing in order to implement district
voting in time for the general election on November 3, 2020.
Recommendation
Open the public hearing and accept community input on the creation of
Council district boundaries and on the draft maps submitted for
consideration; then consider proposed, population -compliant maps and
provide direction to staff; and confirm the current proposed election
sequencing in order to implement district voting in time for the general
election on November 3, 2020.
Background
The California Votina Rights Act (CVRA):
The California Voting Rights Act, Elections Code Sections 14025-14032, was enacted in
2001 to implement the California constitutional guarantees of equal protection and the
right to vote. It provides a private right of action to members of any protected class where
an at -large election system impairs the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of
its choice or its ability to influence the outcome of an election.
The CVRA allows for legal challenges alleging that the at -large system has resulted in
racially polarized voting within a jurisdiction and seeking a court order that a jurisdiction
convert to a by -district election system. At -large is a designation system in which
members of a governing body are elected to represent the whole city, rather than a subset
of the city. In contrast, district voting systems are ones in which a city is divided into
separate geographic districts, each of which elects its own representative(s) who
reside(s) in the district and who is/are elected only by the voters residing in that district.
March 12, 2020 — Staff Report
By -District Voting — 3rd Public Hearing
Page 2 of 5
A violation of the CVRA may be established if it is shown that racially polarized voting
has combined with an at -large voting system to impair the ability of a protected class of
voters to elect candidates of its choice or to influence the outcome of an election.
"Racially polarized voting" under the CVRA means voting in which there is a difference
between the choice of candidates (or other electoral choices) that are preferred by
voters in a protected class and in the choice of candidates (and electoral choices)
preferred by voters in the rest of the electorate.
The CVRA does not require proof that racially polarized voting actually resulted in the
defeat of a group's preferred candidate. Nor does the CVRA require a plaintiff to show
racial discrimination by the jurisdiction or other discriminatory intent.
The CVRA also allows successful plaintiffs to recover attorneys' fees. No public entity
has successfully defended itself against a CVRA challenge; some jurisdictions have
paid millions of dollars in plaintiffs' attorney fees trying to do so.
Citv of Palm Desert History Relatinq to the California Votinq Riqhts Act:
The City of Palm Desert currently elects its City Council through an "at -large" electoral
system in which each council member may reside anywhere within the City's
boundaries, and each council member is elected by the entire electorate.
On 18 September 2017, the City received a letter from Kevin Shenkman of the law firm
of Shenkman & Hughes, alleging that the City's at -large electoral system violates the
CVRA. Mr. Shenkman claimed there is evidence of Latino "polarized voting" in the Palm
Desert electorate and threatened litigation if the City did not adopt a by -district electoral
system. Based on information provided by consultants at that time, the City did not
respond to the allegations contained in Mr. Shenkman's letter.
On 5 June 2019, Lorraine Salas and Karina Quintanilla, represented by Shenkman &
Hughes in Malibu and Goldstein Borgen Dardarian & Ho in Oakland, filed a lawsuit
against the City of Palm Desert alleging violation of the CVRA based on the City's
continued use of an at -large voting system.
The City does not believe that the record establishes Latino racially -polarized voting
has occurred in the City in violation of the CVRA. However, it recognizes that, because
the CVRA establishes a fairly low threshold, numerous public agencies throughout
California have faced challenges to their at -large election systems and that no public
agency has succeeded in court when challenged under the CVRA.
In recognition of the unanimous record of legal rulings against similarly -situated
California cities, and with mindfulness of the expenses they have incurred while
challenging these rulings, the City of Palm Desert entered into negotiations with the
plaintiffs and their attorneys with the goal of settling the lawsuit in a manner consistent
with the best interests of all residents of the City.
March 12, 2020 — Staff Report
By -District Voting — V Public Hearing
Page 3 of 5
On 12 December 2019, the City of Palm Desert and plaintiffs Salas and Quintanilla
announced a settlement of the lawsuit filed by the plaintiffs' attorneys. Key elements of
the settlement agreement include conducting a public hearing process to configure two
voting districts in the city of Palm Desert, and instituting ranked choice voting in both
districts (if feasible). One of the districts, including approximately 20% of the city's
residents, would encompass the downtown core and elect one council member. The
second district would include the remainder of the city (about 80% of the residents) and
elect four council members. Both the City Council and the plaintiffs must ultimately
agree to the district boundaries, which are intended to fulfill the goals of the California
Voting Rights Act and of the City's 2013 Strategic Plan and 2017 General Plan.
General:
This staff report was prepared to accompany the third public hearing during which
interested parties may offer input concerning the boundaries of districts that will comply
with the California Voter Rights Act and the draft maps proposed for consideration.
Additional public hearings will be conducted at dates that are defined later in this report.
Communitv Outreach
Staff has posted information about the process of transitioning from at -large to by -
district elections on www.representpd.org, Facebook and NextDoor, engaged with
traditional media, issued mass mailings to every residential and business mailing
address in the city, distributed informational flyers through faith -based organizations
and schools, and conducted informational workshops for interested parties on January
15 and February 12, 2020.
A Notice of Public Hearing regarding the consideration of maps for establishment of by -
district elections was published in the Desert Sun on March 1, noticing the third public
hearing (March 12, 2020). Another Notice of Public Hearing on the same subject will be
published in the Desert Sun on March 15, 2020 for the fourth public hearing (March 26,
2020).
Process
The City is required to hold at least four public hearings during this process. The first two
hearings were to help develop criteria for creating the proposed districts. These criteria
may have included:
• School attendance areas
• Natural neighborhood dividing lines, such as highways or major roads, washes,
canals, and/or hills
• Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks
• Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/election concerns
March 12, 2020 — Staff Report
By -District Voting — 3rd Public Hearing
Page 4 of 5
• Shared demographic characteristics such as similar levels of income, education,
or linguistic isolation.
The primary focus of the process was defining the downtown -core district.
As required by law, the two initial public hearings were held within 30 days of each other
(February 13 and February 27, 2020); inserted below is a timeline for transitioning to by -
district elections. In addition, the City held two community meetings to provide
information about the map -drawing process and solicit feedback from the public, which
was used to draft preliminary district maps. In addition to the community meetings and
required public hearings, staff will continue to engage the public through traditional and
social media as well as targeted outreach and meetings.
The map drawing process began after the initial two public hearings. The City's
demographer prepared options for the City Council's consideration; those options are
appended to this staff report. In addition, members of the public proposed maps, all of
which may be considered. It should be noted that maps were received that did not
comply with the statutory requirements for population count in districts, but those maps
are not being proposed for further consideration. The maps have been available for at
least seven days prior to this third public hearing. The final two public hearings will be
held within 45 days of each other. Thereafter the City Council may adopt a map
establishing districts.
Voting Options
As part of the transition to district voting, the City is committed to the implementation of
ranked choice voting, with the intent to do so in time for the general election to be held
in November 2020. This system of casting and counting votes is intended to allow voters
to express a full spectrum of preferences, not locking them into a single choice, but
allowing expression of a scale of preferences for various candidates. Further information
about ranked choice voting is available at www.representpd.org and at www.fairvote.org,
and will be the subject of voter education outreach efforts by the City in advance of its
implementation.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund associated with the conduct of this public
hearing.
March 12, 2020 — Staff Report
By -District Voting — 3rd Public Hearing
Page 5 of 5
DISTRICT ELECTIONS PROCESS TIMELINE
City of Palm Desert
73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 ph. 760.346.0611
Note: All future dates are tentative
1s' Community Meeting: Presentation to community regarding
January 15, 2020 process and purpose of transition from at -large to by -district
election system
2"d Community Meeting: Presentation to community regarding
February 12, 2020
the map drawing process and purpose of transition from at -large to
by -district election system
February 13, 2020
1s' Public Hearing without maps: gather public input on the
composition of zones
February 27, 2020
2nd Public Hearing without maps: gather public input on the
composition of zones
Ongoing
City Council and community outreach to educate and encourage
public participation in mapping options
March 12 and 26,
V and 4'h Public hearings: City Council hearings to consider and
2020
select new district maps
April 16
5tn Public Hearing: Potential adoption of district maps by City
Council.
May through
Voter outreach and education on new election format, including
November 2020
ranked choice voting
November, 2020
First by -district election in two districts on November 3, 2020
2021
Districts redrawn to reflect 2020 census data
LEGAL REVIEW
Robert W. Hargreaves
City Attorney
City Manager, Lauri Aylaian
DEPT. REVIEW FINANCIAL REVIEW ASSISTANT
CITY MANAGER
Lauri Aylaian Janet Moore
City Manager IDirector of Finance
Andy Firestin�)
Assistant Citv Manager
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Public Hearing published March 1, 2020
2.Memo from National Demographics Corporation (NDC)
- 7 Maps submitted by the public
3 Maps submitted by NDC
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ABOUT CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION IN
DRAWING DRAFT MAPS AND BOUNDARIES FOR THE
CITY'S TRANSITION TO A BY -DISTRICT ELECTION SYSTEM
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Palm Desert will conduct two (2)
public hearings regarding the drawing and consideration of maps of proposed districts in
the process of transitioning from at -large to by -district elections.
On Thursday, March 12, 2020, and Thursday, March 26, 2020, the City Council
will hold public hearings at 4:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practicable, at the
Palm Desert City Council Chamber, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert,
California 92260, in order to continue receiving public input and discussing composition
of the districts in the process of defining district boundaries and preparing maps.
Proposed maps and more information are available at www.representod.orq.
Dated: February 26, 2020
RACHELLE D. KLASSEN, CITY CLERK
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
City of Palm Desert
73-510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578
www.citvofpalmdesert.orq
NDC City of Palm Desert — Districting 2020 3/2/2020
Comments vrovided by Mau Submitters
DCra-.vfordl — .S rrbmitter did not prof ide comment
NDC Note.- P%rot population -balanced and appears vulnerable to a racial tienymanderin{ cba1/enge
JButlerl — Vubndtter did not provide comment
JBuller2 — S•ubmitter did not pmeide comment
MDemryl- Tlus meets the objectives of population size at 9542 per the 2010 census data provided,
contains the majority of Hispanic speaking residents, and is contiguous as required and maintains
the continuity of the remaining portions of the city as well. It also encapsulates the city s main
business core into one area.
NDC Note: Not population -balanced
MDemry2 - This meets the objectives of population size at 9501 per the 2010 census data provided,
contains the majority of Hispanic speaking residents, and is contiguous as required and maintains
the continuity of the remaining portions of the city as well. It also encapsulates the city s main
business core into one area.
1NDC Note: lti'ot population -balanced and appears vulnerable to a racial genymandernrh cballenge
MMcilroyl — Vubnjitter did not provide comment
MMeyerl — Submitter did not pmc ide comment
,NOC Note: 1'Vot contiguous
NDC Draft Descriptions
NDC Draft 1 - This is a compact, contiguous option that follows major roads and is ease to
understand. It keeps together the central core between Highway I I I and the Whitewater River west
of Deep Canyon Road, including the College of the Desert, the Civic Center, Desert Town Center,
and the business on the north side of Highway 111. The businesses between Highway 111 and El
Pasco could be added without changing the population numbers.
NDC Draft 2 — While slightly less compact than NDC Draft 1, NDC 2 is another contiguous
option that links the Hovely Gardens and Vista Palm Desert neighborhoods to the central core. It
keeps together the areas between Highway 111 and the %X'hitewater River broadly between Monterey
Avenue and Deep Canyon Road, and the areas just north of the Whitewater River between Portola
Avenue and Cook Street, including the College of the Desert, the Civic Center, , and the business on
both sides of Highway 111. The College of the Desert or the businesses between I Iighway 111 and
I"I Pasco could be removed without changing the population numbers.
NDC Draft 3 — NDC Draft 3 starts with h1Nleyerl, altering it slightly to make the outer district
contiguous. It removes the large block at the northwest corner of Portola Ave and Alagnesia halls
Drive that includes the Palm Desert Mobile Estates. No other changes were made, and with this
alteration, the map is contiguous.
n
�V
Al
r,
l:
f!7
z
rs 0•
b G
O 9 "d rAy
A 2. 00
N ^
M1
n
ra
0.
Partola Ave
e
�c
s�
Cask St
City of Palm Desert - DCrawfordl
iDistrict
Remainder
1
Total
TOW Pop
39,732 1
8,713
48,445
Deviation from ideal
244
976
_ 1,220
% Deviation
2.46%1
-10.07°/0
12.53°/0
% His
16%
53%
230/n
% NH White
77%
40%
70°/0
Total Pop
% NH Black
20/6
21A
2%
% Asian -American
4%
3%
4%
Torsi
32,990 1
5,723
38,714
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration (Nov 2018)
Voter Turnout (Nov 2018)
Voter Turnout (Nov 2016)
ACS Pop. Est,
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Lart},nrage Fluency
Education (among those age 25+)
Child in Household
Pct of Pop. Age 16+
Household Income
Housing 5tats
% Hisp
130/0
49%
17°/a
%NH White
W/°
45%
75%
°/n NH Black
2°I0
3%
2%
% Asian/Pacis1.
4°/0
6%
4%
Total
23,002
3,243
26,245
% Latino est.
13%
320/°
15°/n
/a $Parish-Sumamed
12 /0
°. _
......-- °
14 /n
..... __........ ......
%Asian -Surnamed
1%
1°/0
1 °/a
1%
1% .._.
--
% Hllipino-5umamed 1%
% NH White est.
-----....----
83°/0
- - —
52°/0 _
o
W/o
ON N H 13lack
20/0
4%
20/0
Total
16,811 1
2,029
18,839
1/0 Latino est.
100/0
26%
12°/0
Spanish -Surnamed
9%
23 A
160
_/o
%Asian -Surnamed
I%
1%
1%
°/o FLlipino-Sutria_m_cd
% NH White est.
86%
_ 68°/0
84%
% NH Black
2%
4°/n
2%
Total
18,829 1
2,471
21,3W
% Latino cat.
11 %
28%
13%
_
% Spanish-Stirnnn d
1{P/o
25°/0
12%
%Asian-Sumalned
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
°!u Filipino-Sttmamed-
1% �
660A
82%
°/o N1 i 1%-hire est. 84%
% NH Black est.
2%
4%
2%
Total
42,013
1 9,523
51,536
WO-19
--- -
- -- -
17%/
49/
41/
g2151
39/
2a 6%
-
42°/0
lus 46°/o
immiig= -
18%
2b°/a
1911/0
41%
48%
nsruralixed 50°/0
en ish
WA
-
55°/0
76%
Spanish
130/6
35°/°
1T°/a
asan-ling
3%
_
6%
30/9
other tang
4%
4%
41YP
Speaks Eng. "Less dtatt
Very Well"
50/9
180/0
7%
hs-grad
55%
570/
560/0
-
bachelor
23% -
150/0
22%
_
gmduatedegree
160/6,
1 11% F
15°/a
child-underl8
14%
1 250%
15%
e mployod
49%
1 56%
50%
income 0-25k
21 %
270/o
22%
income 25-50k
20% -
24%
210/0
income 50-75k
190/u
20°/o
190/0
income 75-200k
300!01
26°_/o
300/6
income 2OOk-plus
9%
3°/°
8%
sin c family —
71%
64%
70%
361/6
300/0
multi -family 29%
rented
35%
54°/6
37°l0
owned
65%
460/e
63°/n
ur
,eons
x
I
I
F
R
J
A
Monte 4yr�
Pgpolx Ave
v
Cook 5t
City of Palm Desert - jBullerl
District
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration (Nov 2018)
Voter Tumout (Nov 2018)
Voter Turnout (Nov 2016)
ACS Pop. Est.
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Language Fluency
Education (among those age 25+)
Child in Household
Pct of Pop. Age 16+
Household Income
Housing Stats
Remainder
1
Total
-total Pop
38,286
10,159
48,445
Deviation from ideal
-118
470
588
% Deviation
-1.23%
4.85%
6.08°/0
% 1R.-
17°/0
450/6
230/0
—._._..._ _
% NH VA-dte
.
770/0
-47/o
70°/0 -
--%NH Black
2%
2%
20/4
°/o Asian -American
4%
40/n
4%
Total
31,553
7,161
38,714
% Hisp
13%
38%
17/0
IN NH White
80°/a
52°/e_
75%
% NH Black
2%
31/0
20/6
% Asian/Pac.lsl.
4%
6%
4%
Tore]
22,192
4,053
26,245
% Latino est.
I1%
27°/0
15°/0
°/t Spanish -Surnamed
12%
240/6 -
-
14%
% Asian -Surnamed
1%
2°/0
1%
%Flipino-Sumamcd
10/0
1%
1%
%NH White est.
82%
68°A
80%
4%
2°/a
% NH Black 20/°
Total
16,174
2,665
18,839
Latino em
l00/0
21%
121/0
% Spanish -Surnamed
9°/0
19°/0
11%
2%
1%
% Asian-5urnamcd 1%
_
%Filipino-Surnanted
.. .. _ 1°/0
0"/0 _._
- 1°/n —
% NEi 1xhile est.
8501/0
74%
84%
-- %NH Black
2%
4%
TI,
Total
18,325
Z975
21,300
% Latina cyst.
12°I0
22%
139/o
° Spanish -Surnamed
100/0
200/0
120/0
Asian-Sumamed_
1%
21/0
1%
% Filipino-Surnamcd
1%
1%
1%
71%
Me
% NH White est. 840/n
% NH Black est.
210
4%
2%
Total
40,235
11,302
51,536
itgc4-19
14%
26°/0
17/0
age20-60
39%
49%
41%
age60plus
47°Ia
251%
42%
immigrants...__
18°Ia
23%19°/0
45°/a
48%
naturalized 49%
t!nglish
_81%
580/0
760/0
130/0
32%
17%
5°/0
3/6
asi;tn-l:,n v
3°/0
50/0
4%
other lang 4%
SpeakVerys than5%
cii"
16%
7%
hs-grad
55%
58%
56%
bachelor
23%
17%
22%
_ _
graduatedew=
16%
100/0
150/0
child-underl8
13%
26%
15%
employed
48%
57%
50°/n
income 0-25k
22"/a
23%
2r/a
- income 25-50k
21%
2D°/0
24%
21%
191/o
income 50-75k 18%
income 75-200k
30°/0
29%
30%6 _
income 2001k-plus
90/0
4%,
_
80/0
Single family
71 %
64°/a
700/0
multi-famil
29°/0
36%
3[P/o`
----� --
rented
— .._......_ ------
35°/0
-------
51%
37°/0
owned
65%
4T%
63%
ToW population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.
Sarnatnc-bascd Voacx ReK bmoun artd Tumour data frtxn the Cal,fomia Statewide Database.
Iatirw %,omr w0stnrion and tumnvt data arc Spanish-sumatne counm adjusted uskq Census Population Dcpamawt undcwu unt
mdti tcs. NH ❑ bite and NH BL2ck rc& rarkin and tumour wunes mrnated by NDC:. Citizen Vining Age Pop., Age, tmmignti,m,
and other dcrnographk' From the 201 M017 American Ctunrnunity Survey and Special Tabulation 5-war data.
r
T'
Monte. Ave
F
0
•0
n
N
y,
�
a
i.
CD
w i
�•
Ponola AN e
z
0
C_
�r
y
W
D
G Cook St
City of Palen Desert - YBulier2
District
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration {Nov 2018)
Voter Turnout (Nov 2018)
Voter Turnout (Nov 2016)
ACS Pop. Est.
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Language 11luency
Education (among those age 25+)
Child in Household
pet: of Pop. Age 16+
Household Income
Housing Stars
Remainder
I
Total
fetal Pop
38,971
9,474
48,445
Deviatioa from ideal
54
-215
269
°/° DcAdation
0.55%
_
2.21°I°
2.77%
% His
17%
45°/0
23°/o
%NH %White
76%
48°/°
2°/a
70°/0
20/6
% N H Black 2°/°
Asian -American
40/6
3%
40/0
Total
32,026
6,687
38,714
% Hisp
13No
379/o
170/a
,n NH White
W/o
53°/t
75%_
% Nl I Black
2_0/6
40/4
2%
--
% Asian/Pac.lsl.
4%
50/0
4%
TOW
22,356
3,889
26,245
% Latina est-
13%
290/0
15%
"S Spanish -Surnamed
120/0
26n/o
14%
° Asian -Surnamed
1%
1`Y�
1%
-- -
% Fili Yi ursiarncd
10/0
—
1%
1"/x
°/a NH White est.
83%
66%
W/O
%NH Black
20/0
4%
2%
Total
16,346
2,493
18,839
TO Latino est.
100/0
231/0
120/u
nish-Surnamed
_
90/0
WO/0
110/0
% Asian -Surnamed
1%
1%
1%
°/o Filipino -Surnamed
1"/0
M.
1°/n
71%
84%
% N 14 White est. 86%
J% N H Black
2%
4°/0
20/a
Total
18,376
1 2,924
21 W
% Latiao est.
11%
24%
13%
°/o Spanish -Surnamed
100/0
22%
12°/a
% Asian-Sumamed
1%
1%
1%
°l0 Filipino -Surnamed
1%
1%
1%
7p°/a
82%
NTI Whitc stir- 840/n
% Nli Black est,
2°/0
4°/6
2%
Total
41,119
1 10,417
51,536
ng(-0-19
150/0
25%
17%
490/6
41%
agc20-60
39°/6
26%
42°/0
alW60plus 46°/0
immigrants
18°/0
24%
190/0
42°/o
48°/°
naturalized 500/0
english
80%
580/6
76°/0
spanish
1.3%
32%
17°/°
asi. -sang
30/a
5%
3%
other lang
40/4
5%
4°/°
Speaks Eng. "Less than
Very Weil"
59/4
I 1 fi%
7%
hs-grad
56%
bachelor
_55%
23 /o
_W/o
17%
22%
11%
150/0
graduatedeylree 16%
child-underl9
130/0
240/a
15"A
employed
489/o
57%
500/0
income 0-25k
21%
26°/0
22%
income 25-50k
2(a/4
230/6
21°%
income 50-75k
1911/0
21%
190/0
income T5-200k
30°/0
27%
300/6
income 200k-plus
9°/0�
3°/°
_
801/0
single fa
71°%
640/°
7W/o
3b°/e
30°/a
multi-famil<< 29°/a
rented
34°/0
J- 53%
37%
owned
66%
1 47°/0
63°/a
Total rApulatitm tiara Iron the 2010 Dcrennisl Census.
Suxnnuxc-b:LsUd VtPtcx Rcosuation and Turnout dap fntm the California Starmu kie Database.
Istina %7)tcr mgistrarit.n and turnout data ate Spanish-sumamc counts adjusted using Census Population Department undcrcaunt
estimates. NR )XNtc and bill Black registration mid turnout euunts esotrtued by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Agc, Immigration,
and ether demographics from the 2013-2117 Ametican Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-yrx data-
:pan
z
Q'
t.
n
rI
N
C7
�
�
o
d
Portola Ave
Cook 5t
District
City of Pam Desert - MDemryl
Tote] Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration (Nov 2U18)
Voter Turnout (Nov2018)
Voter Turnout (Nov 2016)
ACS Pop. Est.
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Language Fluency.
Remainder
1
Total
Total Pop
39,862 1
8,583
48,445
Deviation from ideal
277
-1,106
1,383
% Deviation
2.77°I°
-11.42%
14.190/9
°/° Hisp - -
- - 17%,
49%
230/°
% NH WNte
76°/6
43%
70%
% NH Black _
20/0
2%
2%
% Asian -American
41%
41/n
40/0
Total
32,943 1
5,771
38,714
% Hisp
13%
42%
170/9
% NH White
80%
T
47°/0
75% --
°/0 NH Black--
2%
_
4°/°
2% --
_—..-
%Asian/Pac.IsL
._..._.._..----..........
4%
—
6%
4%
Total
22,915 1
3,330
26,245
% Latino est.
13%
32°/e
15%
_.....
% Spanish -Surnamed
12°/0
......._.._......_..
28%
14%
% Asian -5tirnamed
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
%Flllpino-Sumamed 1%
% NH White cst.
83°/°
62°/0
80°/6
% NH Black
2°/o
4%
20/0
Total
16,747
2,092
18,939
% latino est.
101/0
25%
1 r/0
% Spanish -Surnamed
9%
23%
110/0
% Asian -Surnamed
1%
1%
1%
% Fil_ i ino-Surnamed
1%
00/0
1%
N I I White est.
86%
680/0
84%
° O N H Black
2%
5%
2%
Total
18,740
2,560
21 W
% I atino eat.
11 %
28°/°
13%
25%
120%
°/° S anish-Sumamed
100/0
10/0
1%
°/n Asian-Surnarned 1%
Filipino-Surnamcd
1%
1%
'66%
1%
% NH Whitc rst.
8S°/°
820%
4%
2°/0
% NH Black est. 2%
Total
42,140
9,3%
51,536
age0-19
15%
25°/0
170A
- - ay e20-60
39%
49°/°
41%
ageOplus
46%
260/0
421%
immigrants
18%
25°/0
190/0
naturalized
50%
42°/°
480/'a
err lish
800/0
56°/0
76%
34%
17°/0
spanish 13°/0
asian-fang
30/0
60/a
3%
other lang
4%
4%
40/6
Speaks Eng. "Less than
Very V cll"
5%
I 17°/0
7°/e
hs-grad 55% 58010 56%
Education (among those age 25+) bachelor 230/0 17°I° 22% -
graduatedeAree 16°% 110/0 150/n
Child in Household child-underl8 14% 250/° 150/0
Pet of Pop. Age 16+ employed 49% 56°/r 50%
income 0-25k 21 % 27% 22%
income 25-50k 20°/a 23% -it °/a
Household Income income 50-75k 190/0 21% 190/0
income 75.200k 300/6 26% 300/0
- income 2(1E)k- lus 9% 1% 8°/0
singlefantil5 71% 641/0 70%
m
Housing Stets multi -family 29% 36% W/o_._..-- ---
rented 35 /0 54 /4 37%
owned 65% 46% 63°/0
Total. population. data From the 2010 Deccnnial Ccnsus.
Surcwmc-b-oodVowrrR rridon stud Tu ut dan fnm the California $tu cu•idc [snare.
Latino voter registration and turnout data arc Spanish-sumame county adjustni using Ccnsus Pupuk don Uepamoent undercount
estimurm NH Whire and NIA Black rcghtratkin and turnout akunts estimated by NDC. C iwz Voting Age Pop-, Age, Immigration,
aril other demographics From she 2011,2017 American Crxnmunity Sun-cy and Special Tabulation 5-year dam.
WgBRS
4
v:
=�b
gab
�
L
r
a
Portola Ave
it
5*
orR
Conk St
i City of l
District
TOW Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration (Nov 2018)
Votcr Turnout {Nov 2Ai8)
Voter Tumout (Nov 2016)
i
I
ACS Pap. Est.
Age
Immigration
t
Language spoken at home
I-Tuage Fluency
Education (among those age 25+)
Child in Household
Pet of Pop. Age 16+
Household Income
Housing 5tats
'alm Desert - MDernry2
I Remainder 1 Tow
Total Pop 40,042 8,403 48,445
Deviation from ideal 322 -1,286 1,608
% Deviation
3.21%
-13.27%
16.48%
% I lid---
_ 17°/°
52°I°
230/6
% NH
77%
41%
70% _
2"A
2%
20/o
_White
% NH Black
4°/n
3%
4%
°/o Asian -American
Total
33,045
5,669
38,714
% Msp
13%
44%
170/6
%NH White
8[1°/0
4°/0
460/°
4%
75°I°
-20/0
% NH Black
% Asian/ Pac.ls1.
4%
50/0
4%
Total
23,099
3,146
26,245
% Latino est.
14%
29%
150/0
Spanish -Surnamed
12% _
_ 26%
14°/0_
%, Asian -Surnamed
1%
1%
1%
1%
1°/0
%Filipino -Surnamed
1%
°/a NH White est.
821/0
65%
W/o
NH Black
_
2°/°
5%
2%
Total
16,813 1
2,026
18,839
0/t Latino est.
11%
22°/0
-
120/0
--110/0
% Spanish -Surnamed
106/0
20°/°---
1%
1%
1%
Asian -Surnamed
1%
_%
% Filipino -Surnamed
01/0
11I0
°/o NI 11X'hite est
85%
71% _
84%
2°/a
50/0
_
°/n NH Black
2"/p
Total
18,891
1 2,409
21-M
% Latino cst.
120/0
25N,
13%
22%
12%
°/oSpanish-Surnamed
10°/0
1%
1°/°
1%
1-%-
-69%
1%
1%
%Asian -Surnamed
9/4 Filtpimo-Sumamed
% NH \X hite est..
84%
82°/o
% NH Slack est.
2%
40/6
2%
'Total
42,158
9,378
51,536
-- a�+e0.19
15%
260%
17°/0
age20160
40°/e
48°/0
41%
aW60plus
46% 26% 42%
immi is
18% 240% 1(r/0
490/0 43o/n �1 48o/q
_
natundiaed
english
800/0 58% 76%
spanish
130/4 33% 17%
30% 5% 3%
_asian-1
- other fang
4% 5% 4%
Speaks Eng. "Less than
Very WO)"
7
6% 16% /o °
hs-grad
55% 570A 56%
bachelor
_
23% 17% 220/0
aduatulepree
16"k 11°/0 l5°/n
Cud-underl8
l4°/0 1 25% 15%
employed
480/0 57% 50%
income 0-25k
22% 24% 22%
income 25-50k
21% 22°/o 21%
income 50-75k
19%
23°/0 190/a
inconic:755 k
300%
27°/a 300/6
income 2(M-plus
9%
40j. 80/0
single farnil•
71%
609/t 70%
multi -family
29%
400/6 30%
350/0 —
- 540/1) 37%
rented
awned
65%
46% 1 63%
,Toro] Fop.haon data from the 2010 Ikrennial Census- I
..-.... ...........__.._.....1:--•------------------
Surname-truscd Voter Rejotraria n arui Tnuttt-ut data Crttm the C:alihtmia Statmidc Database-
/stint+ Vtxet rcgiu muon and tuLl tat data am Spanish -Surname munn adpsted using t.t:[lsus Popula Lion Deparataett undercount
xatimanrs. NR Alutc and NH Black registration and turnout enunrs estimated by tit DC:. Gtiz cn V(jdN Age Pop., Age, luurt*md m,
wand other demographics from the 2013,2017 American Community Survey and Special Tahulati-in 5-year dad.
m
z
F7
_
� a
r
s
Monte v Ave
C
o�
F..a
Portola Ave
M.
Cook 5t
City of Palm Desert - MMcilroyl
District
. Remainder 1
Total
Total Pop
38,288 1 10,157
48,445
Deviation from ideal_
-117 1 468
585
°/, Dmiation
-1.22°/0 4,83%
6.05°/°
% Hisp
17% 45°/0
23%
Total Pop
__ % NH White
76% 48%
70%
% NH Black
2°/n 20/0
2%
°/a Asian -American
4% 4%
4%
Total
31,510 f 7,204
38,714
% H-ssp
13% 37%
17%
Citizen Voting Age Pop
11,4, NNH White
lift 54%
_
75°/n�
% NI i Black
20/0 2%
2°/6
%Asian/Pac.Isl.
4"/4 6%
4%
Total
22,035 4,210
26,245
% Latino est.
13% 26%
15%
0/4 Spanish -Surnamed
12°/v 23°/0
140/
Voter Registration (Nov 2018)
".i, Asian-Sumamcd _
1% 20/0
1%
'% Filipinf�-Surnamed
1% 1%
1%
% NH White est. -
82% 699/°
80°/0
NH Black
29/0 3%
2%
Total
16,040 1 2,799
18,839
% Latino est.
100/0, 200%
12%
°/o spanish-Surnamed
9°/0 18%
1 to/a
Voter Turnout (Nov 2018)
% Asian -Surnamed
1% 2%
1%
°/o Filipino-Sumamcd-
1% 01/4
M.
% NH White est.---
850/0 7511/0
841%
% NH Black
2°/0 31/6
2°/o
Total
18,00 3,233
21,3m
%Latino cst.
120/6 21%
130/4
Spanish-Sumamcd
W/o 190/0
120A
Voter Turnout (Nov 2016)
0/( Asian-Surnaj-nM
1% 2°/0
1%
%Filipinu-Surnamed
1r. 1%
1%
%NH Whitt! cst.
SC/o 74%
82%
"/0 NH Black est.
2% 3%
20/4
ACS Pop. Est.
Total
40,125 1 11.411
51,536
age0-19
14% 270/9
17%
Age
age20-60
39% 48%
41%
a060plus
47% 250%
_
420/6
Immigration
immigrants _
18% 24%
190/0
naturalized
490/0 45°/o
49%
english
81% 57%
76%
Language spoken at home
spanish
12°/0 34°/°
17%- -
—
asian-lang
3% 511/0
3%
- other ling
40/0 5%
Language Fluency
Speaks Eng. "Less than
5% 14°/0
70/
Very Well"
hs-grad
55% 57°/0
56°/o
Education (among those age 25+)
bachelor
23% 17°/0
22%
1•raduatedegrre
16% 11%
15%
Child in Household
chiId-underl8
13°/° k 27%
150/e
Per of Pop. Age 16+
employed
480/0 570%
500/9
income 0-25k
220% 240/0
220/0
income 25-50k
21°/a 20%
21%
Household Income
income 50-75k
1801/u 24%
19%
income 75-200k
30% �280A
30%
income 200k-plus
9°/0 4°Io
8°/0
single family
71% 630/a
70%
Housing Scats
multi -family
........... .....
29°% 37°/0
— -- ._ .._...
all°/,
--- ---- ,.
rented
34 /0 52%
37%
- owned
66% 48%
630/6
Tom] population data from the 201Q Eke nnial Cmsus.
Surnamc-basal Vorcr RtEw t krt and Tum_uut data fre,m the CAd firmia Swcwidc
Database.
Latina voter registration and ntrnout data are Spanish -surname count, adjusted using
Census Population Department undcrcnmt
estimates. NH Wbtc and NIA }Slack registration and
turnout counrs estimated by NOC. Citizen Voting Age Pop-, Age,
Emmipatiun,
and other demographics fmtn the 201 V2017 American Cnmmuniry Surrey and SMial Tabuhrion 5-year data.
%a
N
�
G
�
as
Port[1I.1 Al u
C o,lk sl
City of Palm Desert - MMeyerl
district
Remainder I 1
Total Pop
38,374 ` 10,071
Deviation from ideal
-96 382
% Deviation
_
-1.00°/e 3.94%
4� Hisp
16%, 47°/a
77°/°
46%
Tots] Pop — % NFl VGithe
%N i l Black
21Y6
20/9
% Asian -American
4%
4"In
Total
31,894
6,820
% I4is-p
13%
39%
Citizen Voting Age Pop % NH White
80%
500/0
2°/a 3°/°
% Iti l-1 Black
% Asian/Pac.Isl.
4%, 6%
Total
22,396 3,849
% Latino est.
13°/6 27%
% Spanish-Sumamed
l20/0_— _ 246/a
Voter Registration (Nov 2018) "/, Asian -Surnamed
1°/O 2"/o
1% 1%
- ....................
% Filipino-Sumamed
— -
% Nil Whitc est.
82°/O 68%
20/6 4%
% N 11 Black
Total
16,302 2,537
I ".4 Latino est.
11% 21%
"Ju Spanish -Surnamed
9%
1°/a l%
Voter Tumout (Nov 2018) °Jn Asi;m-Sutnstmctl
Filipino -Surnamed_
1% _ 0"/n
° N14 White est.
85% 74%
"A NH Black
r/n 4%
Total
18,466 2,834
% Latino W.
1204 22°I6
1MG
200/O —
_
°/n Spanish -Surnamed
Voter Turnout (Nov 2016) °/o Asian -Surnamed
1%
2%
% Filipino-Sumamed
1%
1 %
°/a NI -I \White est.
840/4
71%
-
% NH Black est.
2%
4%
ACS Pop. Est.
Total
40,338
11,198
19
14%
1 260/9
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
I..anLruage Fluency
Education (among those age 25+)
Child in Household
Pct of Pop. Age 16+
Household Income
Housing Slats
age20-60
39%
48%
_
aW60plus
47n/°
_
26%
immigmnts
_ 181/6
24%
naturalised
50°/O
430A
english
81 "/o
5r/o
spamsh
_
12%
34%
assian _land
3%
5%
other laniz
4%
5%
Total
48,445
4.94%
23"�
70°/O
2%
4%
38,714
17%
75%
2°/0_
4%
26,245
_ 15%
14°/°
1%
1%
8U°/o
2°I°
18,839
120/a
11%
1%
........ 1 °In .
.84%
2%
21,3W
13%
12%
I%
1%
82%
51,536
17%
41%
42°/a
19"/0
48%
76°/O
17%
3%
4%
Speaks Eng. "Less than
Very Well"
5°/a
17°/0
70/°
hs-grad
55%
570/0
56%
bachelor
23%
170/0
22°/O
11%
15%
graduatedegree 16%
child-ttnderl8
13°/a
26°/O
15% .
employed
480/6
570/6
50°/o
income 0-25k
21%
25%
22t'/6
income 25-50k
21%
22%
21%
22%
191/0
income - - 1 19°/O
income 75-200k
30°/O
27°/O
30%
o incme 2Wk-plus
9°/O
4%
8°/O
single family
71 %
62°/o
70°/O
multi-famtl
29%
38%
30°/O
tented
34%
530/O
37°/O
owned
66%
47%
63°/o
Total population data fmm the 2010 Deomniol Census.
Surname -basal Vn[er Rcgistratinn and Turnout data from the Cali(Irnia Stateuidc 17atabasc.-
I.atinv %,Pwr regiatrnuon and tumour data arc Spanish-surnarne counts adjusted using Census Population Department uudctupunt
estimates. NH Whim and Nil Black reglstratinn and nmr )ur counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Young Age Pop-, Age, lmtnigawn,
and when demngaphics From the Wl2,2017 AmerkAn Cu:wnuniry Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
9
0.
h� a
z
0
w
tj 'O
A ai
E�
wws
M
cn
Poetola Ave
O
C
A
.c
r
V
O
d Cook St
I
District City of Pa
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration (Nov 2018)
Voter Tumout (Nov 2018)
l Voter Turnout (Nov 2016)
ACS Pop. Est.
Age
` hnmigration
ILanguage spoken at home
LanbniaW Fluency
Education (among those age 25+)
Child in Household
Pct of Pop. Age 16+
Household Income
Housing Stats
;'peal p.". twn data fmm the 20I U Decennial Cc
-� I:4xrscd Votcr ltci{isrration wid Turrruut da
La6m vaccr tcgistrawn and nnnout data arc Span
estimates. NH NXIne and NH Black registration ar
and other dtmograph" From the 2011-2017 AMC
Im Desert - NDC Draft 1
Remainder 1 Total
Total Pop 38,740 9,705 48,445
Deviation from ideal -4 16 20
-- 6/u Deviation
-0.04%.
0.17%
0.210/a
%Hisp
17%
47%
23%
46%
% NH White
77%
70%
%NH Black
2°/o 20/0
2%
% Asian-Amcdctut
4o/o 3%
4%
Total
32,211 6,503
38,714
% I-Iisp
13% 40%
170/16
_
%NH White
800/0 51%
750/0
2°/o
% NH Black
_ 2°/0
%Asian/Pac.Isl.
_ _2°/0
4°/a 6°I
4%
Total
22,356 3,889
26,245
' % Latino est.
12% 32°/o
150/4
0/4 Spanish-Sumamcd
110/u 29°/a __
14%
% Asian -Surnamed
I% I%
V/1
1". ,
% Filipltto-Surnamed
lo/n 1%
% NI-1 White est.
—
83% 630A
80"S
2% 3%
% NH Black
2"/o
Total
16,403 2,436
18,839
"/u Latino est.
l0°/a 26% _
12°/a
% 5 nish-Surnamed
90/0 23°/a
11%
% Asian -Surnamed
I%
1%
1%
% Fi' ino-Sumarned
1%
W/o
1"J
G/o NH Whits est.
86%
690/6
84%
% NH Black -
2%
3°/o
20/4
Total
18,352
2,948
21 W
% Latino CSL
11%
28%
13%
% Spanish -Surnamed
10°/6
26%
12%
%Asian-Sumamed
1%
1% 1%
`% Filipino -Surnamed
1%
1% 1%
85%
% NH White. cst.
660/6 820/0
_
'I, NH Black est.
2% 30/6 2%
'Total
40,865 10,671 51,536
aV i& t9
14% l 264% 17 %
age20-10
39°/6 49%
41°/6
ageGOplus
470/6 250K
42%
umnyanim9rants
17% 27%
190/0
naturalized
50% 42°/0
48°/a
ettglish
81 % 53%
760/0
parish
12°/0 36°/0
r
17°/0
—
asian-Ian
2°/°
6%
3°/e
other lang 40/a 4%
4°/°
Speaks Eng. "Less than 5% j 19%
Very Weil" I
7 /0 0
hs-grad 55% 57%
56_%
bachelor 240/4 14°/0
22"/o
gtaduatedegree 16% 11% 15%
child-underl8 13% 1 260/4 150/4
employed 480/0 560/a 50°/o
income 0-25k 21 % 28% 229/0
income 25-50k 200/0 24°/0 21%
income 50-75k 190/o 20% 190/0
income 75-200k 31% 25% �30%
income 200k-plus 9°/a 30/0 60/0
single family 71% 65% 700A
multi -Family 29% 350/630,%
rented 34% 54% 37%
owned 660/a 460% t 630/6
law. I
a from the Califumia Statewide Database-
eh-su'mmc counts -adjusted using Census Population Dcpartmcm undercount
l turnout counts esnnured by NDC: Citimn Voting Age Pop., Age, Imm4 udon,
Kan Coanmuniry Survey and SMial Tahul2aon 5-year data.
as
�
a�
ad
�..;
M •
CD
b
y
Portola Ave
O
�E
7
co, Pic tip
•r.
•0
n
L c f1 m
S w
w S t;'�
'
F SO
r
0 7 �, m
J
City of Palm Desert - NDC Draft 2
District
Remainder I
1
Total
Total Pop
39,008 1
9,437
48,445
Deviation from ideal
63
252
315
% Deviation
0.65%
-2.600/6
3.25°/0
Total Pop
% NH Whitc
76%
_ f
46%
70%
n ii Nl f Black
20/n
20/0
2°/0
% Asian -American
4%
3% —
4%
TOW
32,073 I
6,641
38,714
13%
40o/a
17%
Citizen Voting Age Pop
% NH White
800/°
52%
75%
°/u NH Black
2 /0
2%
2%
% Asian/Pac.lsl.
4%
511/0
4%
Total
22,370 1
3,875
26,245
% Latina est.
13%
28°Io
15%
%Spanish-Sumamed
12°/0
14°/°
Voter Registration (Nov 2018)
% Asian -Surnamed
1%
20/0
1 %
% Filipino -Surnamed
1%
1%
1°/,
% NH White est.
820/o
W/o
800/0
— % N H Black
2%
30/0
- 2'Ya--
TOW
16,307 j
Z532
18,839
% Latino est.
100/°
22%
12%
% Spanish -Surnamed
90/0
19°10
l 1%
Voter Turnout (Nov 2018)
% Asian-Sumamed
10/0
10/0
1%
0/0 Filipino- Su- marncd
_
1%
01/0
1%
%NH White est.
85%
74%
84%
NH Slack -
N.
3°/4
20%
Total
18,490
2,810
21,3W
% Latino est.
I NA
23%
13%
°/o Spanish -Surnamed
l00/0
21%
12%
Voter Turnout (Nov 2016)
°/4, Asian -Surnamed
1%
_
2%
1%
°/o FiliPino-Sumamcd
1%
--
1%
--
I%
--820/0
%NH Whitc cst.
84%
720A
%NH Slack cst.
2%
3%
_
2%
ACS Pop. Est.
Total
40,882 1
10,655
51,536
19
140%
27%
17%
Age
agc20-60
39%
48%
41%
..__....__
agoWplus
47%
256A
420/0
Immigration
immigrants
18%
24%
190/0
naturalized
49%
441A
48%
er#sh
81%
56%
760/0
Language spoken at home
spanish
12°/0
34%
171/o
asian-lang
3%
50/0
- 3%
---
other lang
4%
5°/o
4%
Speaks Eng. "Less than
Language Fluency
Ven Well
50/0
17%
7%
hs-grad
56%
5G°/o
56%
Education (among those age 25+)
bachelor
230A
160/0
22"/o
knaduatCtlCMTcc
160/6 1
11%
15°/a
Child in Household
child-underl8
13°/° 1
27%
15%
Per of Pop. Age 16+
employed
480/0 1
57%
500/0
income 0-25k
220%
24%
22°/0
----
income 25-501k
- -.. ............
21%
20°/o
- -- -
21%
Household Income
income 50-751k
1901/0
24%
190/0
- income 75-200k
30%
27%
30°/a
_
income 200k-plus
- 9%
- 4%
8%
sin& family
71%
61°/0
70"l0
multi -family
29°/0
390/0
300/0
Housing Stats
rcntrd
350/0
57/6
37%
owned
65%
47%
63°/0
T onhpt Madan data from the 2010 Dceennial Ccmus,
Surname-haaxi Voter Rtgistrttutn and Turnout data from the Cafif krnia Statewide
llaubwe.
Isrim voter rrgistmdon and tout data are Spanish -surname rounu adjusted using
Census Pupulatioa
Department undmount
estimates. NH WIdte tend NH Black registration and ttLMOUt [aunts estimated by N13C. Citizen Voting
rage Pap., rage,
Immigration,
uA other demographics fmm the 2012,21117 American Community Survey and Special Tabulacinn 5-year dam.
Pct'tola Ave
x
0
'E
�_._ . Cook St
Lstrict
Total Pop
City of Palm Desert - NDC Draft 3
Remainder; 1
Citizen Voting Age Pop
t
r
%'oter Registration (Nov 2018)
1
Voter Turnout (Nov 2018)
Voter Turnout (Nov 2016)
ACS Pop. Est.
Age
Total Pop
Deviation from ideal
% Deviation
-- ..._......% I -lisp
% NH White
% NH Black
Asian -American
Total
% Hisp
% NH White
% NH Black
°Ia AsianlPac.Isl.
To Latino est.
...............................
_°_/° 5�anish-Surrtarncd_
% Asian -Surnamed
% Fi tow -Surnamed
%NH White est.
% NH Black
Total
% Latino est. _
Spanish -Surnamed
Asian -Surnamed % d
F"iGpino-SGmamed
Total__
% Latino est.
% Spanish -Surname[
% Asian -Surnamed
% Fil_ t-no-5umamp
% NH White est.
% NH Black est.
Total
39,119 9,326
I 91 I -363
age60pius
Immigration
immigrartts
naturalized
engGsh
I Language spoken at home
— slranssh......._...—
•
asian-Unfit
other laniz
Language Fluency
Speaks Eng. "Less than
Very Well"
l
hs-grad_
Educadon (among those age 25+)
bachelor
R-duatedegree
Child in Household
child-underl8
Pet of Pop. Age 16+
employed
incomc 0-25k
income 25-50k
Household income
income 50-75k
income 75-200k
income 200k-plus
single fatnily —
Housing Stars
_—_multi-family
rented
owned
0.93%, 1
-3.75%
170/0_
460/6
76°/a
46%
2°/a
2°/0
40/°
32,288
6,426
13%
38%
80%
51%
2%
4°/a
... ...._
4°/o
..... _... .....
6%
4615 1
3,630
14% 1
:6°%
12°/a 1
23°/°
1% 1%
82°/0 68%
2% 4%
16,436 1 2,403
i l% _ 20°/0
100/0 180/0
1°/0 1%
1% 0°/a
_ 85% 74%
20/0 5%
18,633 1 2,668
12% 22%
11% t9't/o
1% 2%
1% 1%
�840/° 72°A
20/0 4%
41,080 10,456
14% 26°/0
39°/o 48%
46% 26°/n
180A 24%
49% 44%
80°/0 $7°/"
13% 33%
3% W 5^/o
4% 5%
5% 1601/0
55°/0 57%
23%
16% 1l%
13%, 1 26%
48% 1 57%
22°/0 24%
21% 21%
19% 24%
30°/0 280/a_
9tY0 4%
71% 62%
290/e 380/0
35°/0 53°/0
65% 47%
Total popula n Baia tnnn Tlx 2010 Ehmennid Census.
Sumamc-bvartl Voter Registration and Tursmut data fxtm the Califnmia Snteutide D&t2basr.
"tino voter xrgisuaonn s:hl tumout data arc Spanish -surname counts adjusted using Census Population Depamnent 1
estimate N11 Whitc and cif l Black n*tmtion and tumour counts estimated by N!l]CL Ciuzrn Voting Age Pop., Age
and other do rni raphics Fnim the 201 V2017 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-ye data.
Total
48,445
454
4.67%
23%
700%
2°/0
38,7I4
17%
2%
4%
26,245
15%
14%
1
1%
80"/0
2%
18,839
1r10
11%
1%
1°/o
84°/a
2%
21,300
13%
120/0
1%
1%
$2°/a
51,536
17%
41%
42°/o
190/0
48%
76%
17%
3°I°
4%
7%
_560/6
T 22"/a
15%
15%
50°/o
22%
21%
19%
3t1°I0 a
700/0
301/0
630A