Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Informational Report - School District Boundary Transfers
C STAFF REPORT CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE MEETING DATE: June 25, 2020 PREPARED BY: Andrew Firestine, AICP, Assistant City Manager REQUEST: Receive and file informational report on school district boundary transfers Recommendation By Minute Motion, receive and file informational report. Strateqic Plan Obiective While there are no specific priorities related to the unification of school district boundaries within the City, education is a prominent element of the City's Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan documents the performance of the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) and draws connections between educational attainment and attracting businesses that demand a highly skilled and educated workforce. Background Analvsis On February 13, 2020, Councilmember Jonathan requested from staff ideas on how to incorporate all of the City of Palm Desert within the DSUSD. At present, a majority of the City is within the DSUSD. The exception is an area north of Frank Sinatra Drive and south of 1-10, inclusive of the area within the University Neighborhood Specific Plan and those areas west to Monterey and including the Monterey Shore commercial center. This geographic area is presently served by the Palm Springs Unified School District (PSUSD). The process to change or modify school district boundaries, the process of transferring territory from one school district to another, is well defined by the California Education Code (EDC) and is supported by a handbook published by the California Department of Education, available through their website at: httr)s://www.cde.ca.aov/re/Ir/do/. By way of this memo, I have outlined the overall process by which the City can petition for a change, how that petition would be reviewed, and the criteria that would be involved in considering such a change. This would also require the involvement of both the DSUSD and the PSUSD. There is also some historical context that may be instructive as the City Council contemplates any effort to consolidate school district boundaries within the City. June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 2 of 14 Historical Context Since 1990, there have been multiple efforts to work with the DSUSD and PSUSD to modify the school district boundaries to place the City entirely within the DSUSD boundary. The area comprising the Bighorn Country Club was transferred from the PSUSD to the DSUSD following a petition in 1991 from the developer, Westinghouse Desert Communities, Inc., a transfer that was approved in 1993 and made effective in 1994. A petition to transfer undeveloped area north of 1-10 and west of Washington Street from the PSUSD to the DSUSD was also approved in 1993, becoming effective in 1994. Several other transfers were considered about the same time as a consolidated effort, including Cahuilla Hills; a proposal to reverse the prior transfer; and the more than 2,200 acres north of Frank Sinatra Drive and south of 1-10. The Cahuilla Hills transfer was approved while no action was taken on the reversal of the prior transfer or the 2,200 acres. A subsequent petition by residents of a recent development to transfer the 2,200 acres was determined to be invalid by the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools in 1998.123 At the time, outside of the respective school boards initiating a petition process, a change in school district boundaries required either the support of a majority of the property owners in an uninhabited area or the support of 25 percent or more of the registered voters in the inhabited territory to be reorganized.4 The City's records are not clear as to who initiated the petitions or when the final decisions were made but records do show that the subject came up during the budget development in 1995.5 A formal request for action was made in August 1995 to study a school district boundary change.6 A series of internal memos and documents reveal that City staff worked with the school districts and several consultants to the City and the PSUSD to project revenue impacts resulting from See Attachments 1 a and 1 b, titled "A Report on a Proposed Transfer of Territory from Palm Springs Unified School district to Desert Sands Unified School District Area No. 1, Cahuilla Hills, File No. 73" and dated August 1994 and "A Report on a Proposed Transfer of Territory from Palm Springs Unified School district to Desert Sands Unified School District Area No. 4, 381h Avenue at Washington, File No. 76" dated August 1994. 2 See Attachment 2, titled "A Report on a Proposed Transfer of Territory from Palm Springs Unified School district to Desert Sands Unified School District Area 3 Monterey Ave. at Frank Sinatra, File No. 75" dated August 1994. The exhibits and maps to this report were not found in the City's records. 3 See Attachment 23, titled "Territory Transfer Analysis Palm Springs Unified School District to Desert Sands Unified School District Including an Analysis of Education Code Section 35753" prepared by the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization. ° See Attachment 3, a memo from Ray Diaz, City Manager, to Phil Drell, Acting Director of Community Development and Planning, dated February 6, 1996. 5 See Attachment 4, a memo from Ramon Diaz, Assistant City Manager, to City Council, dated June 29, 1995. 6 See Attachment 5, an excerpt of the minutes from the August 24, 1995 City Council meeting. June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 3 of 14 a transfer.' Overall, there were contrasting opinions of the revenue projections from the study area, including redevelopment pass -through funds under a 1988 cooperative agreement between the City, the RDA, and the PSUSD. A July 1996 memo from the PSUSD expressed concern over the financial impact of a transfer on the district and how a transfer would impact its ethnic profile.8 The subject continued in 1998 whereby the City Council directed the city manager to send letters to the PSUSD and DSUSD requesting support for boundary changes, with an intimation that the City would explore the creation of a new school district if that were not successful.9 A September 1999 memo from the city manager to City Council identified the boundary issue remained unresolved and that as the City worked to improve its relationship with the DSUSD, an equity issue existed regarding City and RDA funds expended on schools within DSUSD that may not be available to all residents because the school district boundaries had not been reconciled.10 In October 2001, a staff report to City Council outlined the potential ways that a school district boundary change may be initiated and its process.11 This report identified potential opposition from the PSUSD on the basis that prior planning for the area envisioned resort commercial, commercial, and industrial development, which would have been a significant revenue generator for the PSUSD through developer fees and the RDA, while generating little student population. Projected developer fees alone were estimated between $15 and $20 million and, while acknowledging the rigorous debate between the RDA and the PSUSD consultants over the pass -through funds, the report notes that the PSUSD estimated its projected losses at $38 million over 40 years. The report suggested that a revenue sharing agreement between the City, the PSUSD, and the DSUSD would be needed to generate consensus. At the time, the PSUSD had requested an amount equal to $13 million for the future revenues under the 1988 cooperative agreement, calculated as the present value of the future revenue stream, and additional compensation for future developer fees. See Attachments 6a, 6b, and 6c, memos from: 1) Phillip Drell, Director of Community Development, to Carlos Ortega, Executive Director of Redevelopment Agency, dated March 6, 1997; 2) Carlos Ortega, Executive Director of Redevelopment Agency, to Phillip Drell, Director of Community Development, dated March 19, 1997; and 3) Phillip Drell, Director of Community Development, to City Council, dated September 13, 1996. 8 See Attachment 7, letter from David MacEwan, PSUSD Director Facilities Planning and Development, to Ray Diaz, City Manager, dated July 25, 1996. 9 See Attachments 8a and 8b, an excerpt of an excerpt of the minutes from the January 8, 1998 City Council meeting and letters from Ramon Diaz, City Manager, to the DSUSD and the PSUSD, dated January 15, 1998. 10 See Attachment 9, a memo from Ramon Diaz, City Manager, to City Council, dated September 13, 1999. 11 See Attachment 10, a staff report from Phillip Drell, Director of Community Development, to City Council, dated October 25, 2001. June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 4 of 14 City Council directed staff to prepare a resolution initiating a school district boundary transfer from the PSUSD to the DSUSD in November 2001.12 Resolution No. 01-117 was adopted in December 2001. This initiated a petition to transfer the area north of Frank Sinatra Drive and south of 1-10 from the PSUSD to the DSUSD for the purpose of promoting a unified community identity.13 A preliminary public hearing was held in February 2002, thereby accepting the petition.14 The transcripts of the two public hearings held in April 2002 on the territory transfer reveal relatively significant opposition to the proposal, not only from the PSUSD but also from residents in the PSUSD who were concerned about overcrowding conditions in the PSUSD and saw the construction of new schools in the City of Palm Desert as a means of alleviating those conditions. The territory transfer, many argued, would stand in the way of school construction. Some residents of Palm Desert spoke in support of the territory transfer under the premise that the DSUSD schools were part of the community identity. 15 The transfer of territory was also formally opposed by the City of Rancho Mirage and the City of Cathedral City.16 Following the public hearings, Caldwell Flores Winter, Inc. finalized a report for the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization analyzing the petition request against the nine criteria contained in the EDC. The report found that seven of the nine criteria were met. An account of the report to the Palm Desert City Council addressed the report and offered some rebuttal to comments on the financial impacts to the PSUSD and the DSUSD.17 More specifically, the report found that the petition request did not meet EDC 35753(a)(7), criteria that addresses the change in the cost of school facilities as a result of a proposed territory transfer. These criteria were evaluated as the net effect on the cost to provide school facilities, not the cost incurred to any individual 12 See Attachment 11, a staff report from Phil Drell, Director of Community Development, to City Council, dated December 13, 2001. 13 See Attachment 12, an excerpt of the minutes from the December 13, 2001 City Council meeting. 14 See Attachment 13, letters from the Riverside County Office of Education to the DSUSD and the PSUSD, dated January 9, 2002. 15 See Attachments 24 and 25, transcripts of proceedings from public hearings held in La Quinta and Palm Springs in April 2002 following the acceptance of the petition and prior to the completion of the Caldwell Flores Winter, Inc. report for the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization. 16 See Attachments 15a and 15b, Resolution No. 2002-76 of the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage, adopted July 18, 2002 and a staff report to the Rancho Mirage City Council, dated July 18, 2002. Opposition from the City of Cathedral City is reflected in comments to the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization at the public hearing at the PSUSD in April 2002. 17 See Attachment 14, an excerpt of the minutes from the July 31, 2002 City Council meeting. June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 5 of 14 district. The report considered the respective facilities master plans for the PSUSD and the DSUSD and found that transferring the 2,200 acres and its future growth potential would cause imbalance to the eastern portion of the PSUSD such that it may need to construct additional schools to serve the remaining areas within the district. Related to this, the report also found that EDC 35753(a)(9) was not substantially met, criteria that addressed potential substantial negative effects on the fiscal management or fiscal status of those districts affected by a proposed reorganization. While the number of existing students at the time of the report were negligible and had insignificant impact on either district, the report found that there would be a significant negative impact to the DSUSD capital facilities program as a result of the proposed transfer of territory. Namely, the PSUSD represented that its share of RDA funds would be used to fund a portion of the land acquisition and construction costs for two schools planned within the area. The report determined that the cooperative funding agreement between the RDA and the PSUSD contained no provision to transfer the revenue to the DSUSD and noted the lack of assurances to the DSUSD related to the cost to construct future school facilities. The PSUSD commented on the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization, itself arguing that 5 of the 9 criteria were not met. It also made an argument that the transfer would significantly change its racial profile and that it would promote racial or ethnic discrimination in violation of EDC 35753(a)(4). It also argued that the transfer would disrupt their facilities master plan and its educational programs (EDC 35753(a)(6)). The PSUSD also argued that the transfer would lead to a significant increase in property values and development potential and that the evaluation should consider the significant differential in property values between the two school districts and the resulting benefits to the City of Palm Desert and the RDA if they were to develop on an accelerated course (EDUC 35753(a)(8)). 18 While the City does not have a record of the action taken by the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization in response to the petition, the County Committee would have had to determine that the request met all nine criteria to grant the petition. Considering that the 2,200 acres remains in the PSUSD, it may be inferred that they were unable to reach this conclusion. A February 2003 report to City Council identified that City staff met with staff from the PSUSD on school facility planning and construction, including the potential need for three school sites in the North Sphere (elementary, middle, and high school) independent of projected population growth due to overcrowding conditions within the PSUSD.19 The update noted that the PSUSD was prioritizing 18 See Attachment 25, comments prepared by the PSUSD and dated July 2002. 19 See Attachment 16, a staff report from Carlos Ortega, City Manager, to City Council, dated February 13, 2003. June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 6 of 14 the construction of a K-8 school, followed by a new high school. The PSUSD has since acquired land in the North Sphere, although there is no evidence that plans for its development were advanced. Construction of the Rancho Mirage High School was completed in 2013. The City of Palm Desert's 2004 General Plan continued the goal of aligning school district boundaries with the City's boundary and serving the City with a single school district.20 Current Context While the idea may not be a new idea, many of the factors that influenced prior considerations and decisions have changed. Notably, school district revenues at a state and local level have changed through the adoption of the Local Control Funding Formula (LCCF) in 2013. The elimination of redevelopment agencies, have also changed the dynamics of prior negotiations and anticipated revenue streams through redevelopment and pass -through agreements. The LCCF, among many other changes, works to establish a uniform grade span grant that creates parity in the base funding for each district, variable only by the average daily attendance within that district; supplemental and concentration grants provide additional funding targeted to disadvantaged pupils. There may be a slight to modest impact to the State of California due to the differences in the socioeconomic profiles of the two districts and their current LCCF funding. This may only be of negligible consideration in the case of a potential transfer of territory from PSUSD to DSUSD. Of greater impact, perhaps, is the impact of the elimination of redevelopment agencies and the historic pass -through funding that was shared back with the PSUSD. As specified in a 1988 cooperative funding agreement, the City and the RDA committed to the share back of 50 percent of the net increment tax revenues with the PSUSD within Project Area No. 2.21 The financial impact of this agreement was the subject of much debate with a June 1996 study prepared by a consultant to the PSUSD estimating the loss in redevelopment revenues to the PSUSD at over $27 million if the area north of Frank Sinatra Drive and south of 1-10 were transferred to the DSUSD.22 The study projected FY 2019/2020 revenues to the PSUSD in excess of $2.6 million from the area. These figures, and the development assumptions behind it, were contested 20 See Attachment 17, an excerpt of the Schools and Libraries Element of the City of Palm Desert Comprehensive General Plan, adopted March 15, 2004. 21 See Attachment 18, a letter from the City of Palm Desert and the RDA to the PSUSD with a copy of the cooperative agreement for Project Area No. 2, approved April 14, 1988. 22 See previously cited Attachment 7 for a report from Public Economics, Inc. for the PSUSD, dated June 1996. June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 7 of 14 significantly by the City and the RDA at the time. The elimination of redevelopment agencies, however, have changed the nature of these revenues to the PSUSD and how they may need to be considered as part of a school district boundary transfer. The PSUSD continues to receive property tax revenues under the pass -through agreement. They also receive residual payments from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) once required obligations, costs, and pass - through payments have been paid. Together, the PSUSD receives approximately $1,300,000 annually in these revenues (in addition to their regular allocation from the general tax levy). While the revenues are considerably less than what they projected to receive in the 1996 study, they remain a fairly sizable figure. Moreover, the revenues are exempt from the LCCF calculations and therefore would not be backfilled by the state as it would be if they were property tax revenues subject to the LCCF. This means that if the area were transferred from the PSUSD to the DSUSD, it would be lost revenue to the PSUSD. The payment of developer fees was also a subject of significant contention, with the same June 1996 report from a consultant to the PSUSD estimating this loss at over $19 million. The PSUSD has been collecting school impact development fees on residential and commercial development within the subject area. The PSUSD Annual and Five -Year Reportable Fees Report for FY 2018/2019 shows an ending balance on June 30, 2019 in excess of $20 million (for the entire district) with no capital projects identified within that portion of the district that is within the City of Palm Desert.23 There is no indication how much developer fees have been collected within the City of Palm Desert. Also of note are recent bonds approved by voters within the PSUSD. These do not fund the development of a school within the area located north of Frank Sinatra drive and south of 1-10 but if the assessed valuation within the PSUSD decreases through the transfer of territory to the DSUSD, this may impact the ad valorem tax rate levied on remaining properties within the PSUSD. And upon transfer to the DSUSD, the properties would be subject to property tax within that district and those bonds that have been issued within the DSUSD. The PSUSD has acquired a parcel of land for the purpose of building a future school within the City of Palm Desert. Despite this, the PSUSD Long -Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 identifies no plans for the construction of any schools within Palm Desert.24 Moreover, the area north of Frank Sinatra Drive and south of 1-10 within the City of Palm Desert is currently served by three schools: Sunny Sands Elementary School, James Workman Middle School, and Rancho 23 See Attachment 19, titled "Palm Springs Unified School District Annual and Five -Year Fee Report for the 2018-2019 Fiscal Year". 24 See Attachment 20, titled "Palm Springs Unified School District Long -Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029". June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 8 of 14 Mirage High School.25 The master plan identifies that the 2018/2019 enrollment for each of these schools was below its capacity and that enrollment is projected to decrease over the coming years as is summarized below: School Original Current 201812019 Projected Capacity (2012 Capacity (2019 Enrollment Enrollment Master Plan) Master Plan) (2026) Sunny Sands 620 1,279 726 528 Elementary James 1,147 1,695 1,298 1,008 Workman Middle School Rancho Mirage n/a 2,607 1,570 1,366 High School A June 2018 study session presentation from PSUSD staff to the PSUSD Board identified the Palm Desert school site on a presentation slide with other surplus properties. It is unclear whether any official action was taken by the Board.26 Beyond impacts to the PSUSD and the DSUSD, there is also the possibility that a school district boundary transfer and the resulting impacts to the PSUSD and DSUSD under the pass -through agreements may more direct impact the City and the Successor Agency to the RDA (SARDA). More specifically, additional research is required to determine the extent to which the transfer affects payments to the school districts and other entities that receive a pass -through payment and what level of involvement the SARDA, the Countywide Oversight Board for the County of Riverside, and the California Department of Finance may be required to have to consider how a change in school district boundaries and the corresponding changes in payments to those districts affects the obligation payment schedule. Additional review is also necessary to assess whether a change of this magnitude would be qualifying event for bonds within Project Area No. 2. Process and Criteria A body referred to as the county committee on school district organization has an important role when it comes to managing school district organization. In some cases, these committees are appointed by a county board of education. The duties and responsibilities of the county committee may also be assigned to the county board of education. In Riverside County, the County Board of Education appoints an 11-member body to serve as the County Committee. The Riverside County Committee on School District Organization reviews school district reorganization proposals, including proposals to transfer territory between school districts and to unify or create new school districts. The County Committee 25 See Attachment 21, a map of the PSUSD attendance boundaries, dated November 2017. 26 See Attachment 22, a presentation to the PSUSD Board of Directors, dated June 12, 2018. June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 9 of 14 makes decisions to approve or disapprove proposals to transfer territory. For proposals to unify or create new school districts, the County Committee makes a recommendation for approval or disapproval to the California State Board of Education. Under the EDC, there are multiple methods by which a transfer of school district territory may be initiated. Only one of these, however, allows a city council to initiate a petition. Referred to as a 10 percent petition, this option includes a provision for a city council to initiate a transfer petition through a resolution approved by a majority of the members of a city council. The process today is nearly identical, if not the same, as the process initiated by the Palm Desert City Council in 2001. The California Department of Education School District Organization Handbook dated September 2016 contains a flowchart that provides an overview of the process, reprinted on an ensuing page. The flowchart contains references to the regulatory support contained within the EDC. Generally, however, this process may be described as: 1. Following the submission of a petition, a preliminary hearing is held by the county committee. The purpose of the preliminary hearing is to grant or deny the petition. If a petition is granted, the county committee is required to adopt a tentative recommendation. 2. Procedurally, a public hearing must be held within 60 days following a committee's adoption of a tentative recommendation. 3. The county committee must initiate a study of the transfer request and determine the impact of the territory transfer on the conditions listed in EDC 35753. 4. CEQA review is required. 5. And within 120 days of the first public hearing or within 120 days of complying with CEQA, the county committee adopts a final recommendation. In some cases an election is required. Only when one of the following three conditions are met may a transfer be made without an election: a. The territory is uninhabited, the majority of the owners of the territory consent to the transfer, and the governing boards of all affected school districts consent to the transfer; b. The territory is inhabited, the territory constitutes less than 10 percent of the assessed valuation of the district from which the territory is being transferred, and the governing boards of all affected districts consent; or c. The election area for the territory transfer, as determined pursuant to EDC 35732, is uninhabited territory as described in EDC 35517. 6. Last, actions taken by the county committee approving or disapproving a petition may be appealed to the State Board of Education. June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 10 of 14 In the case of the area north of Frank Sinatra Drive and south of 1-10 within the City of Palm Desert, the Palm Desert City Council may initiate a petition for the transfer of this territory from the PSUSD to the DSUSD through a Resolution approved by a majority of City Council. This petition would be decided by the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization. As the area is inhabited, it would require an election unless both the territory is less than 10 percent of the total assessed valuation of the PSUSD and the petition has the consent of both the PSUSD and the DSUSD. The criteria by which a petition to transfer territory is reviewed are reprinted on the page following the flowchart. tV o U. N ,I o � 0 m t ---Ad= t D d \ ° m O m ° o ° d m Ole gy°' Yi �ma N N V1 O N , 0 5 pp 0 5 drA GIJ-O N � N O \ yN S r0 613 i T p o �i � aN jd4 d 9 T SW d N y \ U c N G N � O G D N.9 s. y N y 6 N Ol 7 , N -p Y to t� G . °n' E NF N %can �DtO't �U o ' $% d� 3 Gty and o cat5 $ oEEvU G 0 %G, N SO, �L J� d v ° U c Er a o d W r 'nN Ds°80yn tci ywl C-1 ono 0 o• Z mr 'C ! N A G 9 ab in Q O-W /W June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 12 of 14 EDC 35753. (a) The state board may approve proposals for the reorganization of school districts, if the state board has determined, with respect to the proposal and the resulting school districts, that all of the following conditions are substantially met: (1) The reorganized districts will be adequate in terms of number of pupils enrolled. (2) The school districts are each organized on the basis of a substantial community identity. (3) The proposal will result in an equitable division of property and facilities of the original district or districts. (4) The reorganization of the school districts will preserve each affected district's ability to educate pupils in an integrated environment and will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation. (5) Any increase in costs to the state as a result of the proposed reorganization will be insignificant and otherwise incidental to the reorganization. (6) The proposed reorganization will continue to promote sound education performance and will not significantly disrupt the educational programs in the affected districts. (7) Any increase in school facilities costs as a result of the proposed reorganization will be insignificant and otherwise incidental to the reorganization. (8) The proposed reorganization is primarily designed for purposes other than to significantly increase property values. (9) The proposed reorganization will continue to promote sound fiscal management and not cause a substantial negative effect on the fiscal status of the affected district. (10) Any other criteria that the state board may, by regulation, prescribe. (b) The state board may approve a proposal for the reorganization of school districts if the state board determines that it is not practical or possible to apply the criteria of this section literally, and that the circumstances with respect to the proposals provide an exceptional situation sufficient to justify approval of the proposals. In the case of Palm Desert, the 2001 petition made an argument for a transfer on the basis that it would support the development of a unified community identity. Most of the other criteria were of no impact except, as has been noted, financial impacts to DSUSD. June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 13 of 14 Next Steps City Council has the authority under the EDC to pursue a petition to transfer territory from the PSUSD to the DSUSD. It is unclear whether this would require an election. The consent of the PSUSD and the DSUSD would, at a minimum, be required to avoid an election. The conditions for a territory transfer from the PSUSD to the DSUSD remain largely the same as they were in 2001 but the circumstances differ substantially. Notably, in 2001, there were growth projections that supported the identification of future school sites within Palm Desert. Those growth projections, through the RDA and the cooperative funding agreement with the PSUSD together with projected developer fees, also had significant revenue implications for the PSUSD. There appears to be less immediacy to those plans today as the PSUSD schools that serve the area all have capacity and are projected to see a decline in enrollment in the coming years. The termination of the RDA has changed the dynamics of the fiscal impacts of a school boundary change, and potentially some of the driving influences of the prior negotiations. There may still be a future need for schools in the area north of Frank Sinatra Drive and south of 1-10, although there is no apparent funding in place for those schools, and there still are costs to serve those current students and those who may come with future development. The LCCF may be a means to offset some of the costs to serve current students and school development impact fees may offset some of the capital costs of future growth. A local school bond will likely be required for any future construction in either the PSUSD or the DSUSD. At issue may be those fees already collected by the PSUSD and the school site previously acquired by the PSUSD. Those issues, however, may be focal points for discussions with the PSUSD and the DSUSD should the City Council choose to renew discussions on how to serve the City of Palm Desert through a single school district. The City's experiences thus far with territory transfers between school districts are suggestive that any such process will take time and may encounter opposition. There may also be factors and information that are unknown at this time that may make a territory transfer more or less practical. While the City Council has the authority to initiate a petition, the most advisable next step may be to make outreach to the respective school districts to gain their reaction to a potential proposal to transfer territory from the PSUSD to the DSUSD. The school districts participation in any process is required under the EDC — this early outreach may identify issues and areas of concern that need to be addressed or even potential support for a petition. June 25, 2020 Informational Report on School District Boundary Transfers Page 14 of 14 Fiscal Analvsis A school district boundary transfer would not have a direct fiscal impact on the City. City Council direction to pursue a school district boundary transfer petition will likely require significant staff support to coordinate with the DSUSD, the PSUSD, and the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization and there may be a future need for a consultant with specific experience in school district boundary transfers to negotiate a boundary transfer from the to the DSUSD. As well, to the extent that additional research reveals that coordination is required with the SARDA, the Countywide Oversight Board for the County of Riverside, and the California Department of Finance to consider changes to the distribution of tax increment, additional staff support will be needed. LEGAL REVIEW Ro$ert W. H"grwvey Robert W. Hargreaves City Attorney FINANCIAL REVIEW Janet M. Moore Director of Finance ATTACHMENTS: As Noted CITY MANAGER Lauri Aylaian City Manager 0 POSTED AGENDA REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 25 2020 INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY TRANSFERS THIS ITEM INCLUDES MORE THAN 850 PAGES OF ATTACHMENTS THAT ARE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE OR YOU CAN ACCESS THEM THROUGH THE POSTED AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF JUNE 25, 2020, ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE. ATTACHMENT 1a � � � ,� � � � � � � � �' > � � � � � � � A REPORT ON A PROPOSED TRANSFER OF TERRITORY from PALM SPRINGS UNiF1ED SCHOOL DISTRICT to � DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT , ,. ... . ;.. _, ; . >A� 1. : .::� ':::�€i��:°Htf�i:�S,: �1�;�.:'f'3. ;,; Prepared for the RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON SCHOOL DISTRICT ORGANIZATION Dr. Paul R. Beaty, Chairman Ms. Lucky Ramirez, Vice Chai�man Ms. Carmela Gamica Mr. Wayne F. Phillips Mr. Victor Giardinelli Mr. Carlos Sepulveda Mrs. Joan Holtingsworth Vacant Ms. Estelle Lewis Mr. Gary Wittenmyer Mr. John Matson Dr. Dale S. Holmes, Secretary Mr. Elliott Duchon, Acting Secretary AUGUST 1994 � � � � There is a peti�on currently being circulated which includes this area (Cahuilla Hills), the community of Pinyon Pines, and areas south. CRITERION 1 � � � 'The new districts will be adequate in terms of number of pupils enrolled." Findings Both the Palm Springs Unfied School District and the Desert Sands Unified School District should be adequate in terms of enroltment if the subject petition is approved. • TABLE 1 ENROLUNENT INFORMATION* : . ..; ...: . ; ; . Number of sEu�#erat� re�d ;; u�'t�e: area ropQs�d fvr: transfer 13 � � P Number of students remeining>in the Palm S��rngs Un�'red 16,429 School District if tk� Vatt�fer is �cante�i � Number of ste�dents en�otlec# ir� the Desert Sa�ds Un'�'ied 17,926 ' School Di�tt'iC� if ;th4 t�nsfe�' js gr'anied: w � ,.,. , . ,,, .., _ ; * ., „ ; _ ED� : : ; ; _ �� � __ . ... , . .. , _ . ,.. ,.,.,.. _. ,. , _ .,, .. Table 1 shows that the number of students that would be enrolled in both districts after the transfer is effected would far exceed the minimum statutory requiremerrt of �, 1,501 students for a unified district. CRITERION 2 � � � � � �' "The transfer would be organized on the basis of a substantial community identity." J Flndlnq$ Although the subject territory is located within the Palm Springs Unfied Schoal District, the area is isolated from the school facilities of the district by a mountain range. There are no roads leading iMo the Palm Springs Unfied School District from this area. Existing roads lead to the City of Palm Desert which is in the Desert Sands Unified Schoof District. The 13 public school students residing in the territory already attend schools in the Desert Sands Unfied School District under inter-district agreements. 2 � � � � ii � Presen�y, there is no need for Palm Springs Unified School District buses to serve this area, but if the irrter-district agreements should be cancelled, the Palm Springs buses would have to travel through the Desert Sands Unfied School District to reach the students. This would appear to result in a duplication of transportation services. The distances to schools in the respeciive districts are shown below. TABLE 2 DISTANCES TO SCHQOLS � f� � � � �� The one-way mileages from the center of Area 1 to various schools is indicated below: , ;:,: , ... «, : : . . ; . : ; :; >:. ; . - I�IIIIE�S Tt= ':;` ` ° : < ` ' . � ': Mlt�S' FROIIA <:. ,: : , ,, �� : .>: . ; . .. ;. , ....... � PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED Rancho Mirage Elementary 6.3 Nellie Coffman Middle 11.4 � Cathedral Cit�l High 11.4 I DESERT SANDS UNIFIED � Washington Elementary 4.6 Palm Desert Middle 5.8 Palm Desert High 6.0 � , 3 .� !� � � � � � � � CRITERION 3 'The proposal will resutt in an equitable division of property and facilities of the original district or districts." Flndings There are no assets to be divided since the subject territory contains no public school property or buildings. However, should the petition be granted, the territory would drop any liability for outstanding bonded indebtedness in the Palm Springs Unified School District and would automatically assume its proportionate share of any outstanding bonded indebtedness in the Desert Sands Unfied School District (E.C.35575). TABLE 3 INDEBTEDNESS ,, „ . � i � : Palm Springs USD : �esert sands us� Ot�Bt�iit�tding ' ` State SChool Sonds Building �.oan Juna 30, 1993 5,300,000 -0- -0- -0- Total Long Term Debt 4 TiTi �T��i -0- � The current tax rates per $100 assessed valuation for the respective districts are shown below. Based upon the assessed valuation of $45,893,879 the subject territory would generate property taxes as follows: TABLE 3a PROPERTY TAXES � � �f ,s� : > .. ,.. ' �ISTRI�CT > CURRENT TAX RATE � Palm Springs USD � Desert Sands USD ��.. .0975* ARQ�RTY'FAX CiENERATED 2,845.42 44, 746.53 * This is an override�tax which would resutt in property taxes at the rate of 9.75 cents per $100 assessed valuation ($97.50 per $100,000). Currently, the property ovmers in the territory pay a bond interest and redemption rate of $6.20 per $100,000 of assessed valuation. 4 � � If the territory is transferred, the ovmers will pay an override tax of $97.50 per $100,000 as a part of their property tax bills and the Desert Sands Unified School District will receive $44,746.53 in property tax ger�erated funds. CRITERION 4 "The reorganization of the districts will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or � segregation.' Flndings � The transfer would involve 13 students, all of whom are white, and who already attend schools in the Desert Sands Unfied School District under inter-district agreements. ` Desert Sands Unfied School District curren�y has 6,795 white students (389'0 of its enrollment). Palm Springs Unfied School District has 7,104 white students (43% of its �„ enrollment). CRITERION 5 �; "T'he proposed reorgani�ation will not result in any substarrtial increase in costs to the �. r �714tB. M � Flndings < The Vansfer should not cause any substantial increase in costs to the state. The revenue limits of the districts should not be affected. � TABLE 5 i993-94 REVENUE LtMITS �j � _, , , . „ . ,., , , . , ; :<..,,:. . . . . . . ,;< _ :. - ; .. : ' �.b1�tCT" .. , . ��83-94. . , h , ;, Ea�f ue m , mat� Baas Reven v � Pe�.A.nJ�l. Palm Springs Unified School District 3,397.81 � Desert Sands Unfied School District 3,356.33 � „ , , . , „ , __ . ._.., , , .,---,. .. , ...,. �,.__ ,,.,.,,. .._, , ,,_,,., ,,... � �� � 5 � , � � � � �? � d � �� � � � CRITERION 6 'The proposed reorganization will not signfican�y disrupt the educational programs in the proposed district and districts affected by the proposed reorgani�ation and will continue to promote sound education performance in those districts." Flndings The proposed transfer of territory should have no effect upon the educational program of either school district. The esserrtial elements of a school district's education program are: Currlculum... the menu of courses offered such as math, scisnce, etc., integrated to compliment each other and to indude statutory requirements. Extra-curricular Activfttes... athletics, clubs, community service adjunct programs, etc. Resources... books, media equipmerrt and facilfties, technology, software, satellite programs, etc. The transfer of 13 students would not appear to affect any of these elements. CRITERION 7 'The proposed reorganizafion should not result in a signific�nt increase in school . housing costs." Flndings The gain or loss of 13 studerrts should not cause a signficant impact upon the school faalities of either district. CRITERION 8 "The proposed reorganiza�on is not primarily designed to resuR in a signficant increase in property values causing flnanaal advantage to property owners because teRitory was transferred from one school district to an adjoining district." Flndings Given the existing conditions, the proposed transfer would not appear to cause financial advarttage to property owners. However, the property tax rate for �his territory would be increased should this transfer take place (See Table 3a). [=� � �� CRITERION 9 � � � � � � � " The proposed reorganization will not negatively affect the fiscal management or fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization." Findings Since there are only 13 studerrts in the territory, all of whom already attend Desert Sands Unified School District schools, and the proposal will not change the revenue limit of either involved school district (See Table 5), the transfer should have no signficant effect financiafly on either district. Currently, the Palm Springs Unified School District is not receiving its revenue limit base income for the 13 studerrts. TF�e money for these students goes to the Desert Sands Unfied School District which is educating the studerns under inter-district agreements. However, should the inter-district agreements not be in effect, the permanent loss/gain by the respecctivve districts is illustrated in the next paragraph. If the petition should be approved, 13 students would permanently change districts to Desert Sands Unfied School District. Using the currerrt revenue limits for calculation purposes, the Palm Springs Unified School DisVict would lose approximately $44,172 (13 x$3,397.81) of its income the first year �nd corresponding amourrts each following year as its revenue limit changes. However, bear in mind that the district would no longer have the responsibiiity for educating the 13 students. The $44,172 loss is approxlmately 0.07% of the Palm Springs Unified School District General Fund Budget of $64,403,383 for this year and the 13 students are approximatefy �.08% of the district enrollment. Converseiy, the Desert Sands Unified School District would gain approximately $43,632 (13 x a3,356.33), but the dis�ict would then be responsible for educating the 13 students. � � 7 � � � � � � � � � � � � �' If the petition is approved, both governing boards, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(h), would have to agree by board resolution to the reallocation of any other regular property tax revenues generated by the subject terrttory. Any loss by the Palm Springs Unfied School District would be offset by a corresponding increase in the state apportionment. If the transfsr is approved, the Palm Springs Un'rf'ied School DisVict would lose revenues from the bond interest and redemption tax, which is part of the property tax and is based upon outstanding long term debt (See Table 3). For example, this year the disVict would lose approximately $2,845.42 and would lose corresponding amounts each future year as the assessed valuations change. �Thus, this year's loss on bond and interest redemption tax revenue would be approximately 0.005°�6 of the Palm Springs Unfied School District General Fund Budget of $64,403,383. The Desert Sands Unified School District would gain a greater amount because the district levies an override tax. � If the transfer is approved, both goveming boards, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99(h), would have to agree by board resolution to the reallocation of any other regutar properry tax revenues generated by the sub)ect territory. Any loss by the Palm Springs Unfied School District would be offset by a corresponding increase in the state apportionment. Conversety, ar�y gains by the Desert Sands Unfied School District would be offset by a corresponding decrease in the state apportionment. As noted in Criterion 5, there would be no increase in costs to the state. Palm Springs Un'rf'ied School District would lose approximately $2,845.42 per year in proceeds from the bond ir�terest and redemption tax should the area be transferred. : � QTHER CONSIDEeAT10NS � Since this Is a proposal to transfer territory, there is no requirement for the County Committee to report to the State Board of Education whether the proposed transfer would adversely impact the school district organization of the county or whether the proposal would be compatible with the master plan submitted by the County Committee and approved by the State Board of Education. However, as a poirit of ir�formation, the County Committee is assured that there is no problem regarding either of these important conrems (E.C: 35707). The assessed valuation of thls territory is less than 10% of the assessed valuation of the Palm Springs Unfied School District (E.C. 35709). OTHER INFORMATION FILIN(3 FEE Should the pe�tion be granted, a filing fee of $1,200.00 for processing this proposed transfer would be assessed by the State Board of Equalization. An additional 1096 charge would be added if the notfication of transfer is filed during the month of +� December. This fee would be paid by the district rec�iving the territory, the Desert .� : Sands Unfied School District. z. � � � 9 � �. � � �r � � � � � � � � � �� _> � � � A. C� C. EXHIBRS AND MAPS Legal description of the territory Maps showing the territory proposed for transfer Student summary report (Geographic information Center) 10 � � � � 0 �.. ; _- � � �� � BEING ALL OF SECTION 25, 26, 35 AND 36 T.SS., RSE., S.B.B.M. AND ALL OF SECTION 2 T.6S., RSE., S.B.B.M. � � � � , - ��� � . ,;; , - , . .._ , - I _� ,�, , � ��..— . � t r � :,�� � rr-►� G � r �� ' � a ' • ' ' ' r o�r S � ! • � � � 'y _ . i � � I � � ` E ��y � IJ A1 . I.? '�7' f 1 � } /i � ^� '� 7 � ? '�! :� /� j r . � R � I Jr � , 1` �'r � , . ,1 � F �, o T .�'� .,�.. , 1 . ... .., f " •�; �'�� � ,s rn � r ��7 r� r_ �■ xc � r.� �r � a � � fr � r� s� � ' �r� r �+ '� . �,.,. � � ! � -' � . ` •.x i .��� ! � e�. wr,. t� • f . � l! i% l8 y - JC tT t r � # � . ,t • !S � � r„ �„ � ' � � � %i.�w+,r • � „ .,,.,,�� � � � a �I . � y u � � a: st .rs 3� � .te � �� � �■ � it � » � i . ' �. � r... � . '� �� ' ` , I � .�� -`� . ' ' , . ` a� �� . � .s i r �/�L�+� f' �• 6 � a � � � � r � ' �f �� ' � ; ��� .�I� "'/ej`i• � �N.. S � 1 1 Y I {�� . .� - � - . r�'� T � iIS.4NQ � . � • a, 1 � �':. P M 3 . � _ p ' 7 • � P'�ry ' b i � . . d ) N�! rr y • �r I ,.� � � � ►►n���Ur ' + �_ n -�► �� � � ,� � ��]�} -^ s 1 , �' �� �� �/ M �., � � , +Q ' . �+ � � i'ri 1 w .r . �f �! ■ , '"' ��J i • � [i HOUSAHD , PpLMS +� j '� �T � ,' � �� ,r, „ ''- i .T A S �G �' F 1 -•.•,� � , t . r �� - r � ��.w P^'1 I � .y i � , \ � 4' i � � � � � i rr r� r1 , ro � � 1� 'r I a+ r� _ .. i �1 i t �.,� f ' �_ ' � . � '�_ e � r� I ss rs •- '' i r� I r� � ra � � ��' � I � ; C T ' R. f N' i w � J M 1►� A � �� r c � n� - � � .. . f� ` - , � . � U ►.�' s� � ' J' "' ' " � 'c � � + C1�7ii 6R�L_ .� 7° � � -j • { CiTY� r..,�. ,...... ��•• ! . .,, _ • � � 1 I r Z r � , , r. � ' " � � ` � � ��+� � . i l � ; �'e • ftl..� � �r.�y N�lr I a� �ti+�:.. � � r• � ra �e ��r ��� �' 9 � �" �, ~ . � S s .a :. . � ,r •�;;�,-,� !'''F'Y 0 �''� /i� . � � •�, � � � . ! ! . :.i � �r � � �.��y rA � ; J "►�{ ` � � DES� � r �R�Kt R� � ,� ► � . �� . .s � �� `�.�s`1" 6 s � �� � .+...r:.► p � { ' �� � 1 � _ ��f ! � ! � s.--..' ,�,� C C � , . . � .� .� � � � � - �� � �8� ' 1� � � ` `. . ... ; � � r ■g ' �p I 7■ i� ' if��! �� ?� � � _ .� S f � � � I I eA°9�,r '� ` ' � - � ' ' t �� .�� �- _.�3 � � '� � � / �� '�� `�� '" � r.. , r 3D I x� T� r' ' x � � !A/Y � � :�� ` ��� ' f , � I . _ �. � . 'J w � r i �� ��' #� � � �• , fl �.- f"' �/ �1� � � i� X •• � 7 , , , 4 �d�r� �-� ..� • �; : c s � s ,� �..� ` � ' A au j� R- - --� r � . ,._..�..�—. , � � A . ;: � .,, . ,. C � � ,� ` =��' � - � r. '_'�: � I s �,, . , � � �r � a 9 fr ` 1` . : . - 1 I �wra. � . c� 1 R' { ' r � j �. , : � U ...J. � � �. _ I ; ' ! .r . .a • 'r ! ' a � �'t� �• w 3 f � n^ ��_ ' i � C' �.'. . . r "' . . �� . � .. i V ATTACHMENT 1 b � � �;, �::. �::� �, . �.:; t.; � �. , �; �. � �: �. �:; �.� :� � �. <<;. � �,,., �.. �': � i • # " � + � � • � � s a 7 � � from DESERT SANDS UNIFtECi SCNUf.)L DISTRfCT to PA1.M SPRlNGS UNIFIED SCN4C>� E}lSTRICT AREI� 4 ��7H �VEWUE AT 1NASt�INGTON� FI#..E ,Nt�, 76 Prepared for the RtVERSIDE GC}UNTY C�}MMiTTEE CiN SCHOOL. QiSTR�CT ORGANIZATION Dr. Paul R. Beaty, Chairman Ms. Lucky Ramirez, Vice Chairman Ms. Garmela Garriica Mr. Wayne F. Phillips Mr. Victc�r Giardinelli Mr, Carios Sepulveda Mrs, Jc�an Hollingsworth Vac�nt Ms. Estelle Lewis Mr. Gary Wttenmyer Mr. Jahr� Ma#san Dr. Dale S. Hc�lmes, Secretary Mr. Elliatt C}uchan, Acting Secretary AUGUST 1994 �,,,. � • 'The new districts will be adequate in terms of number of pupils enrolled." Findings Bath the Palm Springs Un�ied School District and the Desert Sands lJni�ed Schaol District should be adequate in terms of enrc�llment if the subjec# petition is approved. TABE.E 'f ENRCiLl.MENT INFt?RMATI{�N'` Numb�c a� �€�d�rt� r���i�g in t�e �c�a �rop��l ��c t�ri�fer -�- _. Nurnber af siudent� rei���i�g �n the deser� �ands kJnifie� �t�ci�! 17,926 13is�rict i€ t�e ��ar�Fe� i� grs�ed. N�b�r of s��d�rtts.er�rc�tled i� #h� Pairr� Sprin�s'tJnif'c�d Schc�ol 16,429 , �. Clistr��# �f �h�.trarisf�� i� �ra�t��d , , _ , , �` Bas�d u�c�n '! �9� �B��S ; Table 1 shaws that the number of students #hat wou�d be ent�c�lled in both districts after the transfer is af�ected would far exceed th� minimum statutory requirement of 1,5Q1 students for a un�ed district. " CRITERI{}N 2 'The transfer would be organized on the bas'rs of a subs#antial community r'dentity.�� Findings � This territary is located in an unineorparated are� '1 mile east of the c'rty limits af PaSm Qesert and approximately 4 miles st�utheast of Thousand Palms. 0 '� � The distances ta schoals in the r�spectiue districts are shown beiaw. TABL.E 2 DISTANCES TCi SCHO{3LS The one-way milsages fr�am the center c�f Area 4#o various schools are indicated belaw. MI[.ES 7C} PA�M SPRINGS UNlFIED Refla Lindley Elementary Nellie Coffman Middle Cathedral City High DESERT SANDS UNIFIED Monrc�e Elementary Palm Desert Middle Palm Desert High I�IL.�S FRC1M TNE TERRITE}RY 7.1 3.7 9.8 7.C1 fi.7 6.1 CRITERfC)N 3 'The proposal wiii result in an equitable divisian of property and facilities of the ariginai district ar districts." Findings There are no assets to be divided since the subject territary contains no pubiic schoa! property or buildings. Nowever, should the petition be granted, the territary would dfap any liability for vutstanding bondec� indebtedness �n the Desert Sands Unified School District and wfluid automaticaily assume ifs proportianate share of any autstanding boncf�c� indebtedness in #he Paim Springs Unifiec3 School District (E.C. 35575}. . 3 �: �::� �:,.. �._-; �� � � :' �.: �:. �g' �° �.. � _. .t �� �< > � 3� N�,. # , TABLE 3 INDEBTEDNESS • . . :. , � Palrn Springs USD aesert Sands U�� �� �i� � �ta#� Schoot Building Lc�an � � Tatat l.ong-Term Debt �� ��� i The cuRent tax rates per $1C?C; assessed valuatian for the resp�ctive distric#s are shown belaw. Based �pon the assessed valuatian of $24,573,949, the subject territory would generate property taxes as follaws: TABLE 3a PROPERTY TAXES t]lSTRICT Palm Springs USD Desert Sands USD �tlRRENT fiAX RATE ii. r• 1,523.58 ��,s5�.sa 'This is an override ta�c which wt�uid result in praperty ta�ces at the rate of 9.75 cents per $1t}0 assessed valuation {$97.5q per $100,000). Currently, the praperty owners in the territory pay an c�verride ta�c o� $97.50 per $100,OfJ{� of assessed valuation. If the territary is transferred, the owners wi11 p�y a bond interest and redemptian rate of $6.20 per $100,000 as a part af their praper#y tax bi{Is and the Palm Springs Un�ied Schaal Distric# will receive $1,523.58 in prQperty ia�c generated funds. 4 ,, , ��{3PERTY TAX GENERATED CRITERICIN 4 'The reorganization o€ the districts will nat pramote raeial or ethnic diserimination or segregation." Findings There are nc� students res�ding in the subject territory. The transfer wo�ld not cause any effect upon the raciallethnic ratic�s in e�ther schoo! district. CRITERIt�N 5 "The praposed reorganiza�ion will nat result in any substantial increase in costs to the state." Findings The transfer shc�uld not cause any increase in costs to the state. The revenue limits of the districts will not be affected since no students reside in the subject territory. TABLE 5 19�93-94 REVENUE LIMITS � Palm Springs Un�ied Schoal District Desert Sands Unrfied Schoal District "1�93 94 Estimat�d Ba�e Revenue Lim�t _ #�er A.D.A, 3,397.81 3,356.33 �r • :� ; �� �� 'The prapased rearganization wi11 nat significan#!y disrupt the educational programs in the proposed district and districts affected by the proposed reorganization and will continue to promot� sound education perf€�rmance in thc�se districts." Findings The proposed transfer af territory should have na affect upon the educatianal program of either schooi district. The essential elements of a schaal district's educational program are: 5 Gurriculum... the menu of cc�urses offered such as math, science, etc., integrated to comp{iment each other and tc� include statutc�ry requirements. Extra-curricufar Activities.,. athletics, clubs, community service adjunc# pragrams, etc. Resources... books, media equipment and fac"rlities, technology, saftware, sateliite programs, etc. °'� CRITERIC}N 7 �`�. �The praposed re�rganization shoulc� n�t resu(t in a sigr�ificant increase in school �;:.. housing costs.'" Findings The transfer should have no �ign�cant impact upon the schoal facilities of either �.�, �:, district. CRITERItJN 8 �; 'The praposed re�rganizatran is nat primarily d�signed to result in a sign'rf'icant increase in property vafues causing financial advantage #a property owners because ��u� territory was transferred frc�m c�ne schoc�l district to an adjoining district." Findings Given the existing condi#ions, the prapc�sed transfer wouid r�ot appear ta cause financial advantage to property owners. H�wever, the property tax rate for this '4� territary would be redueed shc�uld this transfer take place (See Tabie 3aj. CRITERtt}N 9 'The prapased reorganization will not negatively affect the fiscal management or �� fiscal stat�as of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the praposed reorgani�ation." 0 �� Findings �„� �, �" Since there are no s#udents residing in the territc�ry, there would be na Eoss of ADA �,' revenue by the Dese�t Sands Unified Schooi District, and the proposal will not change �, the revenue limit c�f either involved sch�ol disirict ESee Table 5}. The transfer should � have no sign�cant affect �nancially an either dis#rict. �:°. . if the transfer is appr�ved, the Desert Sands Un�ied Scho�l District would Eose revenues fram the averride tax, which is part of the property tax but is not based upon outstanding lor�g term debt ��ee Table 3}. For example� this year the district would lose approxirnately $�3,960 and would lose correspc�riding amaunts each future year as the assessed valuafic�ns change. �'' The projected General Fund Budget for #he De�ert Sands Unified School District this � �:� year is $67,575,671. Thus, this year"s loss in averride ta�e wautd be approximately 0.04°� of the b�dge#. T�te Palm Springs Unified Schaol District woufd nat gain a similar amaunt because the district dc�es nat ievy an averride tax. if the transfer is appraued, both affected goveming boards, pursuant to Revenue and Ta�cation Cade Sectic�n 99(h}, would have to agree by baard resolutian to the reallacatian of any other regular property ia�c revenu�s g�nerated by the subject �� territory. Any lass by the Desert Sancls Unified Schoal Distri� would be affset by a �. carresponding increase in the state apportionment. �.;ti: � �4; Conversely, any such gains by the Palm Springs Unified Scttool District would be offset by a correspc�nding dearease in the state appartianment. As nc�ted in Criterian � 5, there would be no increase in costs to the state. C}esert Sands Unified School � District would lase approximately $23,959.6� per year in proceeds firom the tax �;n: override shauld the area be transferred. � 7 C�TNER CC}NSIGERATiQNS f E.C. 357QT) Since this is a proposai to transfer territary, there is no requirement for the Gounty Committee to repart to th� State Baard of Education whether the proposed transfer wouid adversely impact the school districf organ'rz.�tic�n c�f the county car whether the proposal w�auid be compatible with the master plan submitted by the County Cammittee and approved by the St�te Board of Education. Mowever, as a point af information, the Caun�y Committee is assured that there is na ptoblem regarding _ either of these im�c�rtant concerns (E.C. 35707}. The assessed valuation r�f this uninhabited territory is less than 10°lo af the assessed valuation of the Desert Sant�s Un�ed School District. (E.C. 35709}. • •- s _ �� ' Should the petition be granted, a filing fee of $480.00 for processing this propased transfer would be asse�sed by the State Baard af Equalization. An additionai 10°/Q charge wt�uld be added if #he notificati�an c�f transfer is filed during the month af � December. This fee wou(d be paid by the distric# receiving the terri#ory, tk�e Palm �.:.: Springs Unified School District. �.,, � ��:� 8 �., � . � ,• A. �egal descriptic�n of the terriiory B. Maps showing the territory propc�sed for transfer �7 AREA 4 LECAL D�SCRIPTi�N BEING A PORTI02�i 4F �EC'TIQNS 1 AND 2, T. SS., R. 6E, S,B.M,, AND A PORTION OF 5ECTIUN b T, SS., R. ?E., S.B.M., DESCRIBEII AS F{}LLUWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLiNE INTER�ECTIOI�t O�' 38TH AYENUE AND WAS�iINGTQN STREET, �AII'! Pt}IlYT BEBtiiG THE NORTHEAST CORNER 4F SECTION 1 TOWNSHLP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, S.B.�t+I.; THENCE SOU'THERLY ALUNG 'TI�E CEl�ITERLINE OF WASHINGTON STREET AND ALL Tt'S V'AitIUUS CC3URSES TU "I`�E NO1tTHEASTERLY RiGHT-OF-"WAY LINE QF IlYTERSTATE H�GH�WAY RC3ViE NU. 1Q; � 'TEiENCE N�RT�I�ESTERLY AL{}tYG SA�} 1"�C?RTi��ASTERLY RIGHT-UF-WAY LINE OF Il�ti'EiLSTATE t�IG WAY 1{} TO A POINT UF INTERSECTI4N IN THE NORTHERLY LINE t�F SA�Z1 E�'TION Z; . THENCE EASTERLY ALONG TRE Nt?RTHERLY LII�E 4F SAID SECTIUN Z AND ALU1�tG T�iE CENTERLINE O�' 38'I'i� AVEt�iUE T+(� '�"I�� Pt}iNT QF BEGINNiNG. CONTAiNS 540 ACRES Mi�RE OR LESS. i`:+�++�+ � . � � � No 4�(}2 # � � �. �r. ������ � f� ;j` � T . � � �( `�f�' � I�� _.�...- �.... �' _. ....�......��:._-. .-__�_�-_�._ .� � �`" ", <„� v..y, `"'" �----- -- •t^-- r,,, �yj � � �� ._.�..,.�;w � ` —�_ � �. � � � � , ;�,.�000 �� � � �i:ti� , , � � � �� � �� ' ' � I � f...��.,,� .... , � � � .,� ,y „ ,, ,s � ,r � ,d �� �� , d ��' � M e� �s ,� rn � � ' � p/ a � � .. � t � . � � �� � r �� Q .'� ~ ` � Tp „ l � t ` t� `'- � � 2� 2 ' i 1 ✓ '� +'fi � t.? r� � ' t ---- .ro r, I � � �. ' �...... � �,� ,,, .,...,, t� ra �.. rn . , . .,u,,. .�,. .�` i � 1e z. Id � a o � � � IS -� �0 � x i ` —"_`.�_ "_. � �" i � �� , ,.�' ,� � �.... � � `�. � � � � » .: � ��,�.: bV 31 •.` � 0/� )t 1 ; y � j � ,. .rr -�� -" � � � y � � . Xt . l , . � � . ���� � � � ` t , . . � � � � � � � � � � , � � ��,;��„ � � � � � � � � � � �� " � f��,` a 6 �%`i i t { � �. � � . � � �'"�' •<...' � � i * s � ,� , � � � � � � � `r • "�ritl�i�' � �y�+r � ,tX� T L'3� NC i ��� 1 M rr++�.r ».�_.----" ,;J4 1` � +. P �''' J •r � � 7 '�!,'1 p t� � � r► � 't. rt� ` � .� ' �Ittf... ,,�, t ' . . � � np , t I bt� , ..i"'"y," ff,�,�� C� -- - m. . "1 '>, ; i � i; r;�� � � > . I . .� ii , � i� • - tr �� � 4 t� ����� '" � { �� jert � �� K ' 'S` �4 � f .�,i�+g 1�� i N{7tJSl+Nf3 PAl.MS �i�. E ,...l,..ti,- ? 1'�% � �� • � ` �' ''� � • �11L.� � a». r.'7� r �� X". � `l �. _ � + T -'"^_ � �.. �i r.«.e #' 4 `� �L �✓ � fi � , . .. ' a��� � ' � 1 � �-• ' ' -. � � E � ;�s , I• j V i..r '' � 2=. 11 � - ' t � :f ' � � p2 d.� '. j ' k , f , 1i.:.� , � :\...� „ ( ' � � . 4�_ � tT 2'6 t.; ' a � a►"�` \ � 2e � ;� .�a �� 1 � � �/ t�,�+} �f,r/,��Q QRY CAMP ;. 4 , �,/�f7 a�.R�/ � . ! • ,k a' �, ti"l ' =� � E -- ' �`: � �l '�.. ,. .1� !a i r -y � ,�,.. � �ASHlf 6R�tl.�- �"` , . � f Gt"f"1'7" ru� ,.. .:, } � � � . .-+ * � 1 e i � � � � � r s w � �� �"•o . �a.. a � YOt'ti � � � ¢r.�. S` � ! cave � I v�t. ` , ` � r' r rrav lfrfJ � ,�{ �14;� , ` � 1 � ! .:• � �,,�i � =�..` .'`� Iy { .4 •f 2'r � . � I t �it" d g � 1p�:'k �r ��'`^.11: V " �r1./ � � 1?,'�,.,,� � � 1 c �� I . � �r� -'`�' � �� --� .,c��Es R'r � ���` ' ��' ` , ' aanc� j: :�.,,,,,a;�,t- •s � u ' � �-� --'� , c i . 5•�.. ' r{ � �...,.. y� ���... � �. t�r � o « T� �� t . , , �- . , . o � , 4 � ! � a�►+� C ra � y � �/�) ! � rt� • -� `�' ., , , �'i' ' r a � � t( V� {�iAk 3 � ,.�� t� �l .`f( � .�. '� t� � ._ � SJ 2? � �1��3 �,-� 1'.I E...� � # � #O" . � � , � r� r� ?Q � � ����'i -• ! , ....w ..✓ �� �� �iii � �i ,�. � �. - �� . !��� ¢ _ i , � ' � ' !AN iS#s.*' ` _ `�y� ; �Q j, I t�.:. Zt3 t' 't�r �� '. F" � � ` `�,.,,,,. ?s �p 29 �. � � °""t"� •r-�-{ ; �k \ � ` �� 3 � � � • .� • � ; � T. ... . '�A�� �� �z ss .� � l �} R���, � sa,. ��m �11 � � : 4 l � . I ' I III' II�'I I � �I ,wh ff � �i � �n ,d bi� , � i� �y" d ��� I II � .� ' ' � � S � � r— � . . � �� � � 'F A GTU P'A � t' - c s 4 .� * _' �i � � *w'.:,.. ` � �` � „r° � r~" • �r..,�'� � i . , { " � �`+ r'��. , �� � a 1+` t � ti '� lfiw� . � ... ! / � � rsw �� � �C � t o � 4 ,,,, � ! , �' ' - i � � s , .i � � � � �� . � .J �' 7: �`5: 1�? S��E', _ � . . " - , , , _ • t i � w O p 5 � � _ � �..� ! � `' • ! . .! a..r .. �'Yf /�`^+.� . . v Y . . ♦ �.. .���. � ..- .f � • - ' � w nrt • . � . ATTACHMENT 2 � � A REPORT ON A PR4POSED TRANSFER t3F TERRIT4RY from �� PA[.M SPRINGS UNtFIED SCHGt3� DISTRtCT � to DESERT SANOS UNIFIED SCNOOL D1STRtCT AREA 3 MQNTEREY AVE. AT FR�tNK SINATRA, F1LE NU. 75 Prepared for the RIVERSIDE CC�UNTY COMMlTTEE ON SCHOOL C?ISTRICT ORGANIZRTION Dr. Paul R. Beaty, Chairman Ms. Lucky Ramirez, Vice Chairman Ms. Carmela Garnica Mr. Wayne F. Phiilips Mr. Victor Giardinelli Mr. Carlas Sepulveda Mrs. Jnan Hallingsworth Vacant Ms. Estelle Lewis Mr. Gary Wittenmyer Dr. Dale S. Nalmes, Secretary Mr. Eiliott Duchon, Acting Secretary � � � AUGUST 1994 � � � AREA 3 LEGAL DESCRIPTiON �.� BEING ALL UF SECTIt3N 32 AND PORTIONS 4F SECTIONS 20, 28, 29, 31, 33, 34 AND 35, T. 4S., R. 6E, S,B,M., DESCRIBED AS FULLOWS: � BEGINNING AT TH� CENTERLINE INTERSECTIUN OF M+O�NTEREY AVENUE AND FR.A,NK SIt�(ATRA DRIVE, AiSO BEING TAE S4UTH LINE UF TUWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, S.B.M.; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE 4F MUNTEREY AVENUE TQ THE POINT OF IN'TERSECTIUN'WITH THE SOUTH WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE HiGHWAY R4UTE NO. lU; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AL4NG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY �, LINE OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 14 TO THE POINT QF INTERSECTION WITH SAID SUUTH LINE UF SAID T4WNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE C1� 5AID TUWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE b EAST AIYD ALQNG A P4RTION UF SAID CENTERLINE 4F FR.ANK SINATRA I)RNE TO THE POmiT OF INTERSECTIUN WTTH THE CENTERLINE 4F MONTEREY AVENUE AND THE P4INT OF BEGINNING. C4NTAINS 2,Z44 ACRES MORE OR LESS. � �.�Nl3 O` .?� Q t��. ��02 ! 1" a �Y„��`q,�. _ ` � � �'°c�i�"_ �f �� � � � � �� �ti � j,1 i�i � , j : '�" - � ,� ``,._� . �_..__.�.` , _�_� � � i� - � . _ . . .. . r ,� �• c,,r,� ....� r-� ; �, i=.. :.. =E Aa_a t , i .r '> c?' �f I . � • , s - � � � � �. , �� � 1 � � � � � � � . � ' \ ' ' „ : . . . . � �,`��c----1 �� ` ; � � 1 , : � �� � I ? : , l, � �^ �� � � � �� � ''f , s � � ,a � �, 1� r , ( a { �-m-�, , , . r . . , . , „�T'.� � .��,'.�. „T---- T. � " ,E �'. -,- -. ; , �, . , o ,. ,_,, �`�-�Y Q � //� � r :{ _. r' � ^ T K � '�l y !J � SI ) ri TU ' ! /V � ', , t.! ?1 �• 1O U �. �...�.. ,,,� � . � 1 � � ` �----..__ .. . • �. �uu. w�. �ai s '^r Ir � .... t; tp ."9 .' I i IS ..1c tD � ?O 1' I8 R � o I f 1 e , '\. � J � ! � � - ��+ " .. .. � f ' . . . , ' t - • t f � ` o IR � �-____ I " .11 � ,it' !.' J? 3! X �3 J_ � !i �( » � � , � � � � � � � t . , a — _ �-._,' , , . � �� . ! s I . � �.f,,.` 6 i %,T,;:." � '� + � � z , � w� t i � � ^' .�� `f�r�,ti � � � e� � �m5� "' ntt I � I � � � „� � � % . . � ' � � i e�..,.... ! '. _ , �i� � � '� ,.�r� T JJ.��vO � ^'• r` �a� !��� t` f' MS + ' CD �} � . f o � l w ' �j� O ir t�,' • .. � � � � � � +9y� f i � � � Yslnw. � � � . , �r� ���I lt 1 � �' � �I ,y '� �T '�� i ' ; . Q y _ _ i C�.�irf ' � .K 'S„� 1iP' I .6 ' i.7 . �•?' � i ' ' . � ' %, � � �' ' � ; HOUSAND PALMS �° � '' ��.�{ ! � a i ` �� � x' •,..�y '` �„ �u.� .�r t� � ..F -•,- .��"y.,�'., � � ` � " � ' ��.�,,� .� _ rz '� ' . � _ :`:r`��.-t � ,,, r.7 � : � � > ry 1� /� z'+ .•� ` - �� � ��. � E � � �� - � �� � � � sa � : J � .�o rs e � rr � se :� _ . : . � �' • L..} ttiz� �1 A%V�`XO /�lRii t pRY CAHP - � ' � �A � �; ' �� � � a i t • CATH OR�tL,�c .S� �e e , .v .�.� � ' .�� � .�G _- _ ( ' �� �f � , � CIT7r � rur. .,..... ,,}e^� �J � � � � � k � e � J' w � a r � �,�t. , ,f � _ 1 .7 + P ' F � . � a f y �,t+ev h�r/t ( 3< <v Y a r• , ( Ccue s, aw,,.r •�'�., LO�, ' rp�'t�+�� h. .., y ( .o , �,r d:'' .. l�_ � �a� 9 � !C �'� 1 / i �. , �Z � ` P G /'i _� � � �„�,i°�',,,.C"� 'ARE,�' �`. � /(� � � j �p. � l� � 55.' �i���,��Nc�r --''�?_.DES'�RT � ` �i'�'�.��.� �,�� _ r. . � iJ � �s f � ��� ! � /� , ' rd � rT �4 '�� S f�i (''�6E n...+ry 1��' � � a„�„_. � r� � r � ��t1 A'�"'�� �' r. <-. � I� � r�'` .. �, � at E'" �,y/ � 'T' j�i C �[ Ca��' ._.. - .- �_� {� � ^�:x•• � � . � � � . � �t � _ �1 �9 70 � If 12 ' S'YJ �� s. �-•.� } ,y .,, � ....�� .,,.r� �, � � � ?w 1 � . .> i t � r. �-'_ _ �,09� � •c � � + ` , ' �e'. . _ .y.'.. ,._.,, :s � 30 19 2ts t � , .� .�wr i 7d � .� �� /�� aw . � ��T� t / " r !AN f� - I tJ '- � � � I' � •- ,i�� l. " AR 1 , � � ` , � �j 3t �2 �3 sa y � �3Z 3 3� � ,�S" ,'ac ; � � �. � \ � ` b`°M1 !'� 1 -�b' � � .� �. ,. . . �� , . „ _ ,. .,� � , �. � � � , � . .... � F. t � s q � 7 t S �"' �i ! �. A aU ji-q �=- '� - y f , —'—�- ' - 4 {' i I �.... ~ ._.._ � � — +r� � � •. I •� � t�=.�- '"' �r r a j g � ../�� �: � � e 1.'' 9 ,o .i 7. y. t ;"" ».... • � � � . � � � ... � . T. 6S. R, 5 E _ � , �,� . , . , f , � ''"� �- . ., ` . ,, . 1 Y�, _,., /�� , � I � � c . ,,,�.. .. �,_„ ,.., � � , ti ' _ � � � CRITERI4N 1 'The new districts will be adequate in terms of nurnber of pupiis enrolled." Findings Both the Palm Springs Unified School District and the Desert Sands Unified School District shauld be adequate in terms of enrollment if the subject petition is approved. TABLE 1 ENRd[.�MENT INFC7RMAT10N" �, Number c�f s#udents residing in the area proposed far transfer -0- Number af siudents remainir�g in the Palm Springs Unified 16,429 School District if the transfer is granted Number of students enrolled in the Qesert Sands Unified 17,926 School District if the transfer is granted � '" Based upan 1993 CBEDS T�ble 1 shaws .that the number of students that would be enralled in both districts after the transfer is effected wauld far exceed the minimum statutary requirement of 1,501 students for a unified district. CRITERION 2 'The transfer would be organized on the basis of a substantial community identity." Findings The majarity af the subjec# te�ritory, approximately 1,840 acres, is located in the City of Palm Desert. Hawever, approximateiy 400 acres in the northern tip af this triangular shaped area is in an unincorporated area between Palm (7esert and Raneha Mirage. � � � �a � � ' The distances to schaols in the respective dist�icts are shawn below. �: TABLE 2 DISTANCES TO SCHOO�S The ane-way mileages from the center of Area 3 to variaus schools are indicated below: MILES TO PALM SPRINGS UNIFtED Delia Lindley Elementary Nellie Coffman Middle Cathedral City High DESERT SANDS UNIFIED Lincoin Elementary Palm Desert Middle Palm Desert High MI�ES FR4M THE 7ERRITGIRY :. s• :• 0.2 3.5 4,3 CRITERIC�N 3 � 'The proposal wilC result in an equitable division of prope�ty and facilities of the original district or districts." Findings There are na asse#s to be divided since the subject territory cantains no public school property or buildings. However, shauld the petition be granted, the territary wauld drop any liability for outstanding bonded indebtedness in the Palm Springs Unified School District and would autamatically assume its proportianate share of any outstanding bonded indebtedness in the Desert Sands Un�ed School District (E.C. � 35575). � 3 � � � TABLE 3 INDEBTEDNESS � � � Palm Springs USD Qesert Sands USD Outstanding Bonds June 30, 1983 5, 300, 000 -a- State Schoc�t Building Laan -a- -o- Total Long•Term Debt 5, �oo, aoo -a- The current tax rate per $100 assessed valuation for the respective districts are shown below. Based upan the assessed valuatior► of $66,257,282, the subject � territary wc�uld generate property taxes as follows. TAB�E 3a PROPERTY TAXES � DISTRICT CURRENT PR�PERTY TAX TAX RATE GENERATED Palm Springs USD .0062 4,107.95 Desert Sands USD .Q975* 64,600.85 "` This is an override tax which would result in property taxes at the rate of 9.75 cents per $100 assessed valuation {$97,50 per $104,000). � Currently, the property owne�s in the territory pay a bond interest and redemptian rate of $6.20 per $100,00 af assessed valuation. If the territary is transferred, the owners will pay an override tax of $97.50 per $100,000 as a part of their property tax biNs and the Desert Sands Unified Schoal District will receive $fi4,6fla.85 in property tax generated funds. � 4 0 �. • � � � � � CRITERtUN 4 "The rearganizatic�n of the districts will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination o� segregatian." Findings There are no students residing in the subject territory. The transfer woufd not cause any effect upon the racial/ethnic ratios in either school district. CRITERION 5 'The proposed reorganiaation wiil nat result in any substantial increase in costs to the state." Findings The transfer shauld not cause any increase in costs to the state. The revenue limits of the districts will not be affected since no students reside in the subject territory. TABLE 5 1993-94 REVENUE LIMITS DISTRICT Palm Springs Unified School District Desert Sands Unified Schafll District '1993-94 Estimated Revenue Limit Per A.D.A. 3,397.81 3,356.33 5 0 0 � ! . '?he propased reorganization will nat significantly disrupt the educationa{ programs in the proposed district and districts affected by the propased reorganization and will cantinue to pramote sound education perfarmance in those districts." Findings The proposed transfer of territory should have no affect upon the educatianal program of any school district. The essential elements of a school district's educational program are: Curriculum... the menu of courses offered such as math, science, etc., integrated to compiiment each other and ta include statutory requirements. �� Extra-curricular Activities... athletics, clubs, community senrice adjunct programs, etc. Resources... bcaaks, media equipm�nt and facilities, technology, software, satellite programs, etc. The transfer wauld nat appear ta affect any of these elements. CRITERIOtV 7 'The proposed rearganizatic�n should not result in a significant increase in schaol hausing costs."' Findings The transfer should have no impact upon the schoal facilities of either district. CRlTERION 8 'The proposed rearganization is not primarily designed tc� result in a significant increase in prope�ty values causing financial advantage to property owners because territory was transferred fram one schoal district to an adjoining district." Findings Given the existing conditians, the proposed transfer would not appear to cause financia! advantage to praperty owners. However; the property tax rate for this �. territary wc�uld be increased shauCd this transfer take place (See Table 3a}. � 6 � � CRiTERION 9 'The proposed reorganization will not negatively affect the fiscal management or fisca! status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the propased reorganization." . Findings Since there are na students residing in the territory, thera would be no Ic�ss of ADA revenue by the Palm Springs Unified Schaol District, and the praposal will nat change the revenue limit of either involved scho4l district (See Tabie 5}, the transfer should have no significant effeet financially on either dist�ict. If the transfer is appraved, the Palm Springs Unified School District wauld lase revenues from the bond interest and redemption tax, which is part of the property tax and is based upan outstanding long term debt (See Table 3). For example, this year the district wauld lose approximately $4,107.95 and would lose corresponding amounts each future year as the assessed valuations change. Thus, this year's bss on bond and interest redemption tax revenue would be approximately Q.01 °lo of the Pa1m Springs Unified Schaol District General Fund Budget af $64,403,383. The Desert Sands Un�fied Schc�ol District would gain a greater amaunt because the district levies an averride tax If the transfer is approved, both gaveming baards, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Cade Sectian 99(h) would have ta agree by board resolution to the reallocatian of any property tax revenues generated by the subject territory. Any loss by the Palm Springs Unified Schoal District would be offset by a corresponding increase in the state apportionment. Conversely, any gains by the Desert Sands Unified School District would be offset by a correspanding decrease in the state apportionment. As nated in Criterian 5, there would be no increase in costs to #he state. Palm Springs Unified School District would lase approximately $4,107.95 per year in proceeds from the tax ouerride. 0 �1 � � OTHER CC?NSI�ERATIONS (E.C. 35707) Since this is a praposal to transfer territory, there is no requirement for the County Committee to report to the State Board af Education whether the prapased transfer would adversely impact the school district c�rganizati�n of the of the caunty or whether the proposal would be campatible with the master plan submitted by the County Committee ��� and approved by the State Board of Education. However, as a point of information, the County Committee is assured that there is no problem regarding either of these impartant concems. (E.C.357Q7). The assessed valuation of this uninhabited territory is less than 10°I4 of the assessed valuation of the Palm Springs U�ified Schoal District. {E,C. 35709}. � � y 4 . Should the petitian be granted, a fi{ing fee of $900.00 far processing this proposed transfer would be assessed by the State B�ard of Equalization. An additional 10°l0 charge would be added if the notification of transfer is filed during the manth of December. This fee would be paid by the district receiving the territary, the Desert Sands Unified School District. , E�3 � 0 � EXHIBITS AND MAPS A. Legai description af the territary B. Maps shawing #he territory proposed fc�r transfer 9 � � ATTACHMENT 3 ., , ,I�p' , : ;�r DE �,,tTMEP1'i' OF COMMUNITY DEVEL�ENT INTEROFFICE MEMOR.ANDUM ,T�� RAY DIAZ, CITY MANAGER FROM: PHIL DRELLr ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANIYING DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 1996 SUBJECT: NORTH FRANR SINATRA SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGES School district boundary changes in uninhabited areas can be initiated by a petition from a ma�ority of property owners or both affected school district boards. Since Palm Springs will oppose the boundary change, a property owner petition is the only option. The education code states that only property owners who have filed tentative maps or other project applications may sign a petition. A majority of properties in the area already have project approvals. The petition would then qo to a committee o£ �he County Superintendent who would hold a public hearing after which the petition would be approved or denied. If approved, an election would be called. In an uninhabited area, the �lection could involve all or a portion of the electorate of both schQol districts as determined by the County Com[nittee or State Board of Education. If the petition is denied by the county committee, then it would die unless appealed to the State Superintendent of Schools. If the denial is upheld by the State, then the petition would be dead. If the State reversed the decision of .-the county committee, and approved the petition, then the election would proceed. Attached is a summary of the process and criteria for approval specified in the Education Code. Number 2 in the criteria, "The districts are each organized on the basis of substantial community identity"; would support the boundary changes. In their opposition, palm Springs would cite criteria Number 9, "The prepared reorganization will not negatively affect the fiscal management or fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization." We have talked to one large property owner (who also has a project approval) about petitioning for the change. We explained that the differential in� the property tax rates between Palm Springs and Desert Sands would resuit in a tax increase of $63.36 per $I00,000 of assessed value. This translated to $32/acre for undeveloped residential land and $100/hnuse when developed. Despite this increased cost, she felt it important that the future residents of her property attend schools in Palm Desert. � � \ P IL DRELL, ACTING DIRECTOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING Attachments PD/db/tm 1AN-1t-?996 Z1��5 •:i . , ,r . rx /� . i, ,;: � .:� 0 FROM F.COE-?nfc. Technologd '�rrr TO � 916193417�98,�* P . 02 B. �'rocxss: Quick B�eierenc� C6nrit V-i • 7'ERRT�ORY T�iANSFERS JNlTTATED BY OWNERS. 25 PERC�I�T PETTTION� OR DISxRIGT GOVERNIl�TG BOARD (S� Flowchart'V-i.) 1. Initia.tion af Praposals for Territory Txans�e� (EC 35700) a, Pedtion s�gned by 25 perceat of thc negistcrcd vot�rs in the af%cted territory or . b. Peti�an sig�ted by the owner(s) af uniAi�abit�d tenitAry or c. Prxitivn sig�ed by gaverning boarda af al� at%cced dfscri.ct� 2. Deternunatioa of SufSicfcncy oi Pctition (L�C 35704} a County snperiatcadent muct detern�iae the validity of the petition witbiA 2(1 a days aftet rece�ving the petitioa. . ,� b, A petitiaa signed by 25 perccnt of the clectorate must be verified by the counry 'J electio�s d�partmPnt. ." , �' c. The cou�y committee aad the State Board �f Education must be notified when a valid pctition is received. � � 3. k'ublic Heaongs (EC 35705, 35705.5): A�ubkc heariug in each affected rfi�c�ict m�at be held by the county camro�tte�e within 6U days af receipt of a valid petition. �� 4. CEQA Review (�ublic R�es�u�ces Code Section 2100U-217.77'): The county ; sac,itunitt�c musc dct�iue ths impact that rhe temtnry transfer may have on the envirnn�ent ,� .;`� :� ,f -:� .; � a: :.�p ; `� 5. Cou�ty Camnait�ee Study o� the Territory Ttausfer (EC 35753): The couary connautxee �tc►dy naust determine the impaet af the nercitory krausfet on the critezia Jist�d in EC 35753. 6. Approval Process (EC 35706, 357c�, 3Sl i0j a. All t,anitory trartsfers are clecidcd at the Iocal level. - . b. Wlittsi� i20 days of the firct pubiic hcaring, the counCy cc�tW�oittea must approvc or dis�pprove the petition to transfer tenit�zy. c. if eitba of xhe following twa canditions arc met, the cwaty commitcce may apptowe the ttrxitnry trsnsfot w�thout aa ezeotion: i) 'Tba t+er,ri.tory is uninhabit,ed and the s� ority of the owae�a conscnt to the traasfer and the goveruing boards of � A�CCtCd t133tt'eCtS C017Aent tA thC trausfer. �} '�ee teriitory is inhabit,ed and tbe rerritory is tess than IOpercent af the a.ssessed valuati0n of t�e disuict and thc gavcming baAtdi� of all affecrtd d�cts cons�nL d. Fox all otber tcrritory transfers, if tho counry coaunittee approves t�e transfer� tLe caunty snperinconde�t must esll an �ctien in the azea determi»ed hy the covnty cammittec. .. � v.a JHN-ic-1S9b i1��6 � �� � Q �� �� A��w a �� �~ q 9� w _� y �I � O � V � � s �' � � .� � F�QM F,�OE-Inf�. i�chncicg� � � LJ y161w�a17_��. P.l�.i T .:� � � � � ��f � � w � � �� � ^ V p � M a� V , �a� �, ' � ...--- � � � � �� � •�� �� � �� i �� ����� (���� � ��� � �.� r� ����� �w � � i � .a �� _,��� �d��� �� � �� s � �� �� � �� �� �.� ��� �� �:� �w p ��� �,�� � �� � � .^`. v p�'� � '� � ° .� �a� '����� � . � � � �" F � -� � � �, � .. -- � -- ♦. �.. .s � �. � .� u •� . �s � �� . � � � �. � ��� � � ,. V-5 � � �. �� .�� �� a � •� �� � ,� �� �� � t� �i � I f; ��} l;�' � I� t r, ;'� �� i� , � ; �, _,, � ;� �; :� � �� . i ,� , � �� ;a .j ,` � J FI J' ;:,, ,�: ! ,: �;,• �. 1! i� , ,�. JAF�-12-299b 11 � 39 FRChi Ri.OE-Inf o. Techno 1 og� TQ 91619341'�F388,�` P. 06 ,i,! : i �'ik B. Pr�s: Qoidc R,�Perence Giaart V•5 � CRIT�RIA FOR AP'PROVAL OF REORGANIZA'�'iON PROP05ALS �. Thc new d'ustricts w}ll ba adequate ia t�arnos of number oPpupils eruollcd. 2. Tl�,e discr;�ccs an each organized on the basis oi a substantial commuAity identity. 3. Thc puropo�at, w;ll nsutc ia an equitable divisian of pnoperly aad facilide� of the origim�l disttict or distcicts. 4. 'xhe t�eor�auizadon of the dishicts will not promot� racial and ethnic disc:iminadon ' 4[ SCgiC�Op, :;'� 5. The pro�osed �reorganizatio� will aot nsntt in aay substantial increase in costs t� � the ctat�. ;', 6. The pro�osod norgenization will not sig,nitecandy distvpt the educational programs '.ti in thc proposcd districts �ud distcicts �ffe�ted by tbe pt�o�osed reorgsai�.ati�n and �; � will continaue or promote sotind edueational performanae in those districts. 0 7. Tl�e propdsed rwrganizat�oa will not r�esult in a si.gnific�nt incrcase in school ,: hnus�ng wsts_ 8. Tha pm�sed �organiz�tion is not primarf�y desi6ned to result in a �ignf�.cent i�ncrcaaz ia property vatues causing flaanci.a� adva�atage to pmperty owaers becauee ten�irory wss transfemed from one school diatrict to an adjaining disrrict. 9. '�Xie propvsed reorgaaizadon will not negatively afEect the fiacal r�nagement or fi�scal statu�s of the pro�naed district ar sny e�istiag diatriat �ccud by the pzoposcd 2+COr$�lZ8ti0A. � The Stat� Board of Educatioa may approve a proposal of rine t+wrgaaizatian of ` scbaol ctis�i.cts ff ihe Board detr�m�ines ti�at it is ndt practical or possible ro apply ' the crib�ri� of this scction literaity ead that the c:ixcurn�taaces a+itb respcct to the proposaLs provide sn e�ceptional sitvation sufficient to jastify approval of the , �' Pzo�osaLs• Y12 r• - -- TO 91619.s.11 rR�B�'° F'.�1'� JAN-12-199b �1��9 FROM RCOc-Info. Tec!-�nology ;,,:1� '�r►' Crr �'�: �s7I�lA1lt�E'RI � 1. Irt�tietion nf R,�orgaaia.a�ion Pcnpoaala a Covnty Committee PL9ns and Recommcnd:�tions `ri' Th�te a� three aay; ia whicb a pmposat far reo�gaaszation may bcgin at the county comatittx �evel. Pirst, tbe county committrt �Y I�P�� neorgaaizatxans on ita owa ''�mtiati►v�, Sc;co�nd, it mtrst respond to directions o� the State Board c� Ednr.�ti,aa to fi�mulau plaus and recom�uQcndaaons for the rr,organixation a� the districts i�n du county, a any portion o� i.t, i»cictd'w� adjaccnt arc�s in othcr c.ounti�s. 7�iiurrd, the cottnty committee must, gftet a pt�bli.c bcariag, t+ecommend for or agaiast reor�aaizations proposed ta it by petiticm af � 0 perrcent of any cnrire diai�ict's voters. Such i.nidations ara iacluded hene becau�, if the peddon i$ graaGed pursuant tA Educaaon Cad� Section 35721, thc couaty comimilLee will tl�n tatce oa tba petition as it� ov�rn rccommondatioa. (EC 3S7?A, 3S721j b. Reorgaaizatioas Tnitiabcd by Petition The eaw�ly cat�nnoittee on s�iiool district organization and the cow�ty Ruperi�tteAd�t of ecleoola may bc peiitiuned t0 initiate actioAb of rieorgaAiZalian undcr Sectioas 3570a sad 35721 of thc �ducaaon Cade. A pet;tid�o far reorganizati�n may be sigaed by (1} tbe m�jority af own�ers of unu�habited G�rritory: (2) 2-S prsceat af tha xegistcrcd v�atiexs in the ir�babit�d tc[rit�cy propased to be norgat�iud (If the OcrritorY Proposed far reor$a,aization eeaicies wi�hiu cwo or rnone scboot distri,cts, thc signaxures of at kast 25 percent a� thc �tgist�n�ci vatc�s from that r.etritory in each scboo! diatrict ia �cyuired.); o�' (3) ti�c majority of basrd manbers iA each of the af£e�trd distarri,cts for botb � iahabit�ed �wd uninhabited tetritory. Note tbat the petitfon must fu�t be subtnitted to th� county superinte�dant of achools f� dctcrn4inativn of sufficiency (gee atcm 4 of this saction, �ation nf Sufficieney of Blectvretc 1'�titions"). c. �ouadary Xaauaa eo Bc Cc�nsidered V�b�a Init�atiin$ a RWcganizetion i�) $oundary Cliaage Revrganitati�. AII ACtioA t0 trariBfC�' LCttitOty a�,� scilool distriCt iB a� actiou to rieorganize disiri�: i�t th�.s reqnirea tbe appravc�l o£ the cauniy committee o�n scbool district orgaaizatiqn. {EC 35S].1) 2) Relationship of Elementary Diat�i.ct aoundarias to tb�o High SchooI 1'listr�cts.'I'�e baunderics of thc couipUiuent eiemet�tary diSttict must be ct�xttnsive with the high schvol dist�icc inciudi�g t]�em. Cha�ng�s in any af the districts' boundaries muat Aat aher this conditicm. (EC 355�4�, 35541 j Whett�V�r the hottndaries of 9ta aletuetttmry aad a bigii �chool disaict become coterminous, the dist�cts are eoAsidc.red mergtd inw one unif',�d V-13 .r !; �. ; 1 �; fl i,� : �., � `;�i � . ��I ��, r�;�-lc-1q96 11 � 4� FROM P.CGE-info. Technolog� f0 � �`r.r �ib1y3417p�8� �.�d a i 1i riistrict. (EC 355d2) On or a�tcr iau�uary I. i98 i, no sc�ool district may b� newty forrncd or ceorgani�.ed so that any portion of it is campletely �parated by terr,'tory of another school di�trict�s) (1eap�rogging pmhibition)- �C 35543) 3) A.rca Ad.iusimr�ts After 1ZeaX�aaiaation. Priox to tbc �fCectivE Qate of. a r�organi�,ed district, the cou�nty �ommittee tnaY aPp�ove pIar�s to subsequcntiy s�ear.ganize any or ali of �e di�trict. However, during che �irst �vc yeats $fltr a disttict'a frn�nnation, no tercitory may be remoreci from it without its tw�rd's conse�nt. (EC 35545) 4} City's Avthority ovez Xts Cha�ter �oazd. Territary within the boundaries af u ciry which has prov�dcd �or a school distri.ci's board in its charter may uot he t'emovcd fxom that di�trict witbout the ar�rraval of. that �cbao� bonrd. (�C 3554b) '�'��. +�nn t� of P1ans, Petiaons, and Rvcommendatians ,...� +�;�ctain information is required in a petidou fo� �organization, but very ]ittle ib r.equirer� af a county cosnrhi.ttcc plan or. rcxom,nendadol�. (EC 35'1U3� 3573Q� et 6CQ.) a. Three i�ems of b�sic i»f.ormation which should be included in botl� are: l) A legal description and map o£ thc territory to be covexed by th� prapn,ced action (Governmtat Code S+ection 5$$S0, et seq.? and 2j A]ist of. school districts affected by the proposal cu�d 3) Th� reasops fot the prvposed �eorgaaia.atioA. b. The f.ollowing ite�os must be part of �»y petitiqA �"�Ied w�d�r BC 3S7U0: l) A desfgnasion of no mor� than thrce of the petitioner� as c�i.ef peti.tioners for the ptupose of receivin� neti�ration of public bcarings and otlier p�rtinent infoimation. This applies only to a"ZS perc�nt petitioa "(EC 35701) arect 2} A,,� affdavit tUnt �ll sig�azures on rbe pctition are geawne signatures aad were abtaiDcd ia the presence of t2te petitian cu+cuJator. (SC 357U2) c. The foUr�wing items ace su�ested for inclusion in the county anrnrai�toe's plans and rxorrun�ndations. Note tbat oniy item 5 is reqwincd ta be a part of a county committcc rcc4mme�adation. �) WMether tho distri.c�s` govcrning bc�ard(s) wi[i be a ciiy board a�education �opCrolled by a�ity charter o�' a sep�te baard gove,rned by genera)1 aws. {If not statcd, it will be a genecal Je�w district) (EC 35730) V14 m-rai a . cw t i- Section � 35707. 35708. 35709. 35710. .i 35710.5. � 35710.51. �: 35711. 35712. ,.; , J 1 � }- i LOCAL EDUCATI011IAL AGFIIICIES Title 2 Transmittal of petition and recommendations to state boarci of education: report. Hearing by state board of education. Order; notification. Notification of approval; election; conditions. Appeal to state board of education; actions approving or disapproving petitions; filing of appeal notice; determination. Order of election; elapse of time for appeal. Appeal to state board of education. Rules and regulations; adoption. Article 1 was added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4013, § 3. § 35700. Initiation of action; signatures on petition An action to reorganize one or more districts is initiated upon the filing, with the county superintendent of schools, of a petition to reorganize one or more school districts signed by any of the following: (a) At least 25 percent of the registered voters residing in the tenitory proposed to be reorganized if the territory is inhabited. Where the petition is to reorganize territory in two or more school districts, the petition shall be signed by at least 25 percent of the registered voters in that territory in each of those districts. (b) The owner of the property, provided that territory is uninhabited and the owner thereof has filed either a tentative subdivision map with the appropriate county or city agency or an appIication for any project, as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources Code, with one or more local agencies. (c) A majority of the members of the governing boards of each of the districts that would be affected by the proposed reorganization. {Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4013, § 3. Amended by Stats.19S7, c. 917, § 9.) Hlstorical and Statutory Notes Section 7 of Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4025. Educ.C.1959, § 1992, added by Stats.1963, c. provides: 629, p. 1581, § 4, amended by Stats.1970, c. "No right or obligation arising out of any 102, p. 144, § 63; Stats.1976, c. 1042, § 1.5. provision of law repealed by this act shall be Educ.C.1959, §§ 1741, 1742, 2302, added by abolished or impaired by the provisions oF this Stats.1959, c. 2, pp. 677. 678, 704, §§ t741. act." 1742, 2302. Former § 35700, enacted by Stats.1976, c. Educ.C.1943, §§ 2452. 2453, 2572 (Stats.1943, t010, § 2, relating to state board of education c. 71, p. 348), Stats.1957, c. 2077, p. 3691, § 1. guidelines concerning adverse effects on racial Po1.C. � 1577, amended by Code Am.1873--t, or ethnic integration of schools, was repealed c. 543. p. 92, § 10; Code Am.1875�, c. 272, p. 27, § 1; Code Am.18S0, c. 44, p. 34, § 12; by Stats.1980. c. 1192, p. 4003, § 1. The for- Stats.1881, c. 45, p. 40, § 4; Stats.1885, c. 16, p• mer section was derived from Educ.C.1959, 16, § 1; Stats.1889, c. 160, p. 184, § 9; Stats. § 2366.3, added by Stats.1973, c. 1018, p. 2021. 1893, c. 193, p. 245, § 13; Stats.1903, c. 259, p. § 3• 358, § 1; Stats.1905, c. 344, p. 404, § 1; Stats. Derlvatlon: Fo�mer § 35511, added by Stats. 1913, c. 67, p. 71, § 1; Stats.1921, c. 481, p. 1976, c. 1010, p. 2384, § 2, amended by Stats. 732, § I; Stats.l923, c. 336, p. 691, § 1. 1977, c. 36, p. t43, § 133. School C. §§ 2.121, 2.122. 264 1tEORGA Dtv. 3 See West's < Schools � , WESTI..A :. CJS. Scl �. 3570] '- In any tnon th: �� (Added b� Former 1010, § 2 county wt C. I192, p. $ 3570 The p ..school � t the peti geauine (Added i Formr ' toio, § � � the state S�au.198 - section c merly § t See Wes �, $ 35i -�=- �y �. �I'OV15 ` (Addec _ '�� � F�rrr IO1). F ,� ek=:G:or ,, wtu n � �r• � � REORGAI�IIZATI011T--�CHOOL DISTRICTS Dlv. 3 Forms Sce WesYs California Code Forms. Education. § 35703 Lbrary References Schools �37(3). - WESTLAW Topic No. 345_ ° . CJS. Schools and Schooi Districts § 37. -- • g 35701. Dealgnation of chief petitioners to receive notice _ In any petition ta reorganize school districts there shall be designated no - more than threc af the petitioners as chief petitioners for the purpose of � receiving notice of any public hearings to be held on the petition. ;;' (Added by Stats.198Q, c. 1192, p. 4013, § 3.) - _.-;�. y= Hlatorlcal itad Statutory I�Iotes �' Former § 35701, enacted by Stats.i976, c. derivcd from Educ.C.1959, § 2366.5, add�d by �'" 1010, § 2, relating to appeal of findings of Stats.i973, c. 1018, p. 2021. § 4, amended by ''' county committecs, waz repealed by Siats.1980, Stats.1975, c. 1097, p. 2668, § 2. "�� c. 1192, p. 4003, § 1. The former section waz � �tf M. -�.° � ..� § 35702. AfHdavit The persons securing the signatures to a petition of electors to reorganize school districts shall attach thereto an affidavit that all persons who signed the petition did so in the presence of the affiant and that each signature is a genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1 t92, p. 4013, § 3.) Historical and Statutory Notes Focmer § 35702. enacted by Stats.i976, c_ 1588. § 4, renumbered § 2367 and amended by 1010, § 2, relating to hoarings and approval by Stacs.1969, c. 830, p. 1661, § 3; Educ.C.1959, the state board of education. was repealed by §§ 1793, i 794 enac[ed by Stats.1959, c. 2, p. Stats.1980, c. 1192, y. 4003, § 1. The former 681, §§ 1793, 1794, amended by Stats.196t, c. seetion derived from Educ.C.1959, § 2367, for- 1806. p. 3842, § 2; Educ.C.1943, §§ 2504, 2505, merly § 2366, added by Stats.1963, c. 629, p. added by Stats.1955, c. 721, p. 121 t, §§ 2. 3. Forms See West"5 Cafifornia Code Forms, Education. § 35703. Provisions of petltion Any petition filed under this article may include any of the appropriate provisions specified in Article 3(commencing with Section 35730). (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4013, § 3.) Hlstorical and Statutory Notes Former § 35703, enacted by Stats.1976, c. § 1. The former section was derived from 1010, § 2, relat�ng to an ordcr or call of an Educ.C.1959. § 2368, added by Stats.1969, c. eleaion by the county board of suporvisors, 830, p. 1662, § 7. w+as repealed by Stats.1980, c. t 192, p. 4003, 265 ;� � � ,=1 ' �i � ti ,` _ j�' � �. ■� f' M. ! - 7� �� § 35704 LOCAL EDUCATIOIIIAL AGENCIES Title 2 § 35704. Eacamination of petition; transmittal The county superintendent of schools, within 20 days after the petition for reorganiZation is filed, shall examine the petition and, if he or she finds it to be sufficient and signed as required by law, transmit the petition simulta- neously to the county committee and to the State Board of Education. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4013, § 3.) Histodcal and Statutory Notes Former § 35704, enacted by Stats.1976, c. 1042, § 14; Educ.C.1959, § 1795, enacted by 10�0, § 2, amended by Stats.1977, c. 36, § 137, Stau.1959, c. 2, p. 681, § 1795, amended by providing for a hearing by the county board of Stats.1961, c. 1806, p. 3842, § 3; Educ.C.1943, supervisors and the duties of the county super- § 2506, added by Stats.1955, c. 721, p. 1212, intendent of schools, was repea)ed by Stats. § 4, amendcd by Stats.1957, c. 357, p. l013, 1980, c. 1192, p. 4003, § 1. The former section § 20, was derived from Educ.C.1959, § 2369, former- Derivation: Former § 35511.4, added b § 4, am nded b Stats. 9686 c. c1058, p. 2044. Stats.1977, c. 36, p. 302, § 432. Y § 6, renumbered § 2369 and amended by Educ.C.1959, § 1992.1 added by Stats.1976, Stats.i969, c. 830, p. 1662, § 6; Stats.1976, c. c. 1042, § 2. Forms See West's California Code Forms, Education. § 35705. Public hearings; notice Within 60 days after receipt of the petition, the county committee shall hold one or more public hearings thereon at a regular or special meeting in each of the districts affected by the petition. Notice of the public hearing shall be given at least 10 days in advance thereof to not more than three persons designated in the petition as the chief petitioners, to the governing board of all districts affected by the proposed reorganization, and to all other persons requesting notice of the hearing. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4014, § 3.) Hisiorlcal and Statutory 1liotes Former § 35705, enacted by Stats.1976, c. amcnded by Stats.1969, c. 830, p. 1662, § 8; 1010. § 2, amended by Stats.i977, c. 36. § 138. Stats.1970, c. [02, p. 148. § 79; Stats.l976, c. relating to decisions by the board of directors. 1042, § 15; Educ.C.1959, §§ 1795, 3363. enact- was repealed by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4003, ed by Stats.1959, c. 2, pp. 681. 754, §§ 1795, § 1. 'fhe former section was derived from 3363, amended by Stats.1961, c. 1806, p. 3842, Educ.C.1959, § 2370, formerly § 2369, added § 3; Educ.C.1943. § 2506, added by Stais.1955, by Stau.1963, c. 629, p. 1589. § 4, amended by c. 721, p. 1212. § 4, amended by Stats.1957, c. Stats.l963, c. 1832, p. 3773, § 1; Stats.1965, c. 357, p. 1013, § 20; fiduc.C.1943, § 4966, added 703, p. 2099, § 3, renumbered § 2370 and by Stats.1945, c. 1273, p. 2395, § 1. Forms See West's CaliEornia Code Forms, Education. Ltbrary References Schools �37(2). WESTLAW Topic No. 345. CJ.S. Schools and School Districts § 42. 266 �+� REOI � Dlv. . § 35 �-Y � � --„� ..;, .J. �- :� �- ,. a.�; � . :T' . � (a) provi not ir was � �) the cc I�T[ the fc (1) Cmpl� �2� distri (3) of a � (4) five c (5) will t (6) P�P� i�) aad, trustc ig) ness (9) be el mine (Adde Schc WE� C.J� Dde� l. De Cow n'vatic regatic sought a .�_ � REORGA11iIZATION—SCHOOL DISTRICTS § 35705.� �= t1tv. 3 Note t § 35705.5. Additions and amendments to petition; availability of de- . scription of the petition (a) The county committee may add to the petition any of the appropriate provisions specified in Article 3(commencing with Section 35730) which were not included in the petition as filed and may amend any such provision which was so included. (b) At least 10 days before the public hearing, or hearings, on the petition, the county committee shalI make available to the public and to the governing boards affected by the petition a description of the petition, including all of the following: (1) The rights of the employePs in ihe affected districts to continued employment. �(2) The revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for each affected district and the effect of the petition, if approved, on such revenue limit. (3) Whether the districts involved will be governed, in part, by provisions of a city charter and, if so, in what way. (4) Whether the governing boards of any proposed new district will have five or seven members. (5) A description of the territory or districts in which the election, if any, Q,vill be held. (6) Where the proposal is to create two or more districts, whether the proposal will be voted on as a sfngle proposition. (7) Whether the governing board of any new district will have trustee areas and, if so, whether the trustees will be elected by only the voters of that trustee area or by the voters of the entire district. (8) A description of how the property, obligations, and bonded indebted- ness of existing districts wiil be divided. (9) A description of when the first governing board of any new district will be elected and how the terms of office for each new trustee �vill be deter- mined. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4014, § 3.) Library References Schools e�37(3). WESTLAW Topic No. 345. CJ.S. Schools and Schoot Districts § 37. Notes of Decisions Deaegregation plans 1 submit a reasonab(v feasible interdistrict de- segregation pian, notwithstanding the commit- tees' allegation that they aro powerless to act 1. Desegregatton plans on their own and that they only plan and make County committees on school district reorga• reeommendations. Tinsley v. Palo Alto Uni- nization were properly joined in school deseg- fied School Dist. (1979) 154 Ca1.Rptr. 591, 91 regation case wherein a writ of mandamus was C.A.3d 871, appezl after remand I97 Ca1.Rptr. sought to compel elementary schoo) districts to 643, 150 C.A.3d 90. 267 S 2 :e a >f ,e ie �}, ,n- :c. P• �v �� '6, of aIl ch w- =d :v. cv 7). �76, , �. . c. ats. �t. 3—�. 185. � 19. REORGANIZATI011T—�CHOOL DISTRICTS Dlv. 3 c. 91, p. 134, § 1; Stats.1921, c. 596, p. 1007. § 1. Schoof C. § 2.126. Forms See Wtst's California Code Forms, Education. § 35708. Hearing by state board of education § 35710 -�::�- The petition transmitted pursuant to Section 35707, including the plans and � recommendations included therein, if any, together with the recommended "'� approvaf or disapproval and the plans and recommendations, if any, of the y�county committee shall be heard by the State Board of Education as provided _ in Article 4(commencing with Section 35750). _'� (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4015. § 3.) � r- f �. § 35709. Order; notification If the following conditions are met, the county committee may approve the petition and order that the petition be granted, and shall so notify the county board of supervisors: (a) The county committee finds that the conditions enumerated in para- graphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 35753 are substan- tially met, and: (b) Either: (1) The petition is to transfer uninhabited territory from one district to another and the owner of the territory, or a majority of the owners of the territory, and the governing boards of all school districts involved in the transfer consent to the transfer; or (2) The petition is to transfer inhabited territory of less than 10 percent of the assessed valuation of the district from which the territory is being transferred, and all of the governing boards have consented to the transfer. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4015, § 3. �mended by Stats.1990, c. 1658 (S.B.19?.7), § 3�) Library References Schools �37(5). CJ.S. Schools and School Districts §§ 39, 43 WESTLAW Topic I�to. 345. to 45. § 35710� Notification of approval; election; conditions For ali other petitions to transfer territory, if the county committee finds that the conditions enumerated in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivi- sion (a) of Section 35753 are substantially met, the countj committee may approve the petition and, if approved, shall so notify the county superinten- dent of schools who shall call an election in the tenitory of the districts as determined by the county committee and in the manner described in Part 4 (commencing with Section 5000) to be conducted at the next regular election. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4015, § 3. Amended by Stats.1990, c. 1658 (S.B.19�7), § 4.) 269 �� i �� r, ; ;_ ;: . �� ' ' � � :' i � ��� ; � �� � ��, �.� , .� : $'•' -; I i � � . �, �. i� i, '. a! � :� �'� ;��, �_ �r :; _ ��, 'i N,; s '' ., � `� �; _,� � .YY � ( �� ,� § 35730 iOCAL EDUCATI011IAL AGENCIFS Tte�e 2 § 35730. Governing law; proposed new unified school distr[ct including a chartered city withiu its boundaries The plans and recommendations, in connection with the proposed forma- tion of a new unified school district to include within its boundaries a chartesed city, may provide that the establishment and existence of the governing board of the district shall be governed by the charter of the city and not exclusively by general law. Upon adoption of plans and recommenda- tions containing such provision, the establishment and existence of the gov- erning board of the district shall thenceforth be governed exclusively by the city charter and the board shall be a city board of education of a chartered city. In the absence of such a recommendation, the proposed new unified district shall be governed by general law. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4017, � 3.) Llbrary References Schools �37(2). WFSTLAW Topic 110. 345. C.J.S. Schools and School Districts § 42. § 35731. Membership of governing board In any proposal for unification, plans and recommendations may include a provision for a governing board of seven members. In the absence of such a provision, any proposed new district shall have a governing board of five members. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4018, § 3.) § 35732. Territory in which election to reorganize will be held Plans and recommendations may include a provision specifying the territo- ry in which the election to reorganize the school districts will be held. In the absence of such a provision, the election shall be heid only in the territory proposed for reorganization. (Added by Stats.2980, c. 1192, Q. 4018, � 3.) § 35733. Diviaion of terrltory into two or more sepazate school districts; voting " Whenever the recommendation is to divide the entire territory of an existing school district into two or more separate school districts, the recom- mendation may provide that the plans and recommendations be voted upon as a single proposition. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4018, § 3.) § 35734. Trustee areas The plans and recommendations may include a provision for trustee areas that provide for representation in accordance with population and geographic 276 � � �: ► � � .� REORGAIIIIZATI011I—SCHOOL DIS?RICTS § 35735 '` Dtv.3 _, °� s .,� `�; � � -i� :. � :� factors of the entire area of the district. Any provision of that kind shall also specify the boundaries of the proposed trustee areas and shall specify whether members of the governing board shall be elected by the registered voters of the entire school district or by only the registered voters of that particutar trustee area. A proposal for trustee areas shall be considereci as an inherent part of the proposal and not as a separate proposition. In the absence of a provision for trustee areas, the proposed new district shall have a governing board elected by the registered voters of the entire district. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4018, § 3. Amended by Stats.1987, c. 1452, § 214.) Hlstoricai and Statutory Noies Legislative findings, declara[ions and intenc relating to Stats.1987, c. 1452, see Historica( Note under § 1007. § 35735. Computation oF revenue limit per unit of average dai2y attend- ance (a) Any proposal for reorganization of school districts shall include a computation of the revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for the proposed new district. That provision shall be an inherent part of the proposal and shall not be construed as a separate proposition. That revenue limih per unit of average daily attendance shall be equal to the revenue Iimit which would be produced by adding (1) for the second fiscal year prior to the fiscaI year in which the reorganization becomes effective for all purposes, the sum of the revenue limit of each of the districts proposed to be wholly included and the proportional share of the revenue limit of each district to be partially included in the proposed reorganized district is divided by the total number of units of average daily attendance that would have been in the proposed reorganized district had it been reorganized the second fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which the reorganization becomes effective for all programs, plus (2) the revenue limits per unit of average daily attendance required to equal the amount of the difference between (A) the average certificated salary and fringe benefits, and (B) the amount of the difference between the average classified salary and fringe benefits of each of the component districts or any portion of a district during the second school year prior to that in which the district becomes effective for all purgoses and the highest average certificated salary and fringe benefits and highest average classified salary and fringe benefits of any component district included in the proposal multiplied by the number of employees in each category less the number of employees in each category of the district or districts having the highest average salary and fringe benefits, plus (3) the inflation adjustment specified in Section 42238.1 for the fiscal year immediately preceding the year in which the reorganization becomes effective for all purposes, plus (4) the inflation adjustment specified in Section 42238.1 for the fiscal year in which the reorganization becomes effective for all purposes plus any other base revenue limit increases for which the district would have been eligible had it 277 � ,, ;� , r� � � ; 'E� � i Y ' � � . af � �; � : ; a � � i � ► § 35735 LOCAL EDUCATIOHTAL AGF11iCIES Title 2 been reorganized in the second fiscai year prior to the year the reorganization became effective. In computing the increase in the revenue limit in clause (2), any school district or, a portion of a district to be included in a proposal may be considered in determining the highest average salary or fringe benefits pro- vided that the school district, or a portion of a district, contains at least 25 percent of the total number of certificated and classified employees in the proposed reorganized district. "Salary and fringe benefits" shall be a single item of compensation and shaIl not be separately calculated. The revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for the reorganized district shall not be greater than the amount set forth in the proposal as approved by the county committee on school district organization or the State Board of Education except that the amount shall be increased pursuant to clauses (3), (4), and (5). This section shall apply to any transfer of pupils by grade level between elementary and high school districts and, in any case, no transfer of seventh and eighth grade pupils from an elementary district to a high school district, ar vice versa, shatl result in the receiving district getting a revenue limit apportionment for those pupils which exceeds 105 percent of the statewide average revenue Iimit for the receiving district's type and size. (b) Subdivision (a) shall not apply to any unification, consolidation, or other reorganization of school districts occurring pursuant to voter approval at an election held on or before the effective date of the act that added this subdivision, which reorganization shall be governed, instead, by the predeces- sor to this section as added by Chapter 1192 of the Statutes of 1980. (c) Where the territorial jurisdiction of any schooi district was revised pursuant to a unification, consolidation, or other reorganization, accurring on or before July 1, 1989, that resuIted in a school district having a larger territorial jurisdiction than the original school district had prior to the reorganization, and a reorganization of school districts occurs on or after the effective date of the act that added this subdivision that results in a school district having a tenitorial jurisdiction that is substantially the same, as determined by the State Board of Education, as the territorial jurisdiction of that original school district prior to the most recent reorganization occurring on or before July 1, 1989, the revenue limit of the school district resulting from the subsequent reorganization shall be the same, notwithstanding subdi- vision (a), as the revenue limit that was determined for the original school district prior to the most recent reorganization occurring on or before July 1, 1989. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 40I8, § 3. Amended by Stats.i989, c. 82, § 4, eff. June 30, 1989; Stats.1989, c. 83, § 4, eEf. June 30, 1989.) Historlcal and Statutory 1�Iotes Section affected by two or more acts at the same session of the legislature, see Govcrn- ment Code § 9605. 2%8 RE. Div �• F . ert� to i = inc � inc „ rtc � c i�a� the thi � vai . � . di� as inc • (A� Cl; �r= § �: ,. el . - e1 ir _ � Lf i'�, . ` L} , (� =�. � � .. i < c 1 F c REORGAIIIIZATI011I—SCHOOL DISTRICTS § 35738 Div. 3 § 3573b. Division of property and obligations Plans and recommendations may include a proposal for dividing the prop- uty, other than real property, and obligations of any school district proposed to be divided between two or more school districts, or proposed to be partially included in one or more school districts. As used in this section, "property" includes funds, cash on hand, and moneys due but uncollected on the date - reorganization becomes effective for all purposes, and state apportionments based on average daily attendance earned in the yeaz immediately preceding .. the date reorganization becomes effecti�e for alt purposes. In providing for � this division, the plans and recommendations may consider the assessed _ valuation of each portion of the district, the revenue limit per pupil in each � district, the number of children of school age residing in each portion of the � district, the value and location of the school property, and such other matters _ as may be deemed pertinent and equitable. Any such proposal shall be an integral part of the proposal and not a separate proposition. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4019, § 3.) Code of Regulationa References Criteria for reorganization of school districu, see 5 Cal. Code of Regs. § 18573. I.ibrary References �� Schools �41( I ). WESTL.AW Topic No. 345. - CJ.S. Schools and School Districts §§ 73, 74. § 35737. Election of governing board �"� Plans and recommendations may include a provision specifying that the ��r:'� election for the first governing board will be held at the same time as the �,'-- election on the reorganization of the school districts. If such a provision is �� included, it shall specify the method whereby the tength of the initial terms � may be determined so that the governing board will ultimately have staggered -- terms which expire in years with regular election aates. In the absence of ,;� such a provision, the etection oE the first governing board will take place on . the first regular election following the passage of the reorganization proposal. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4019, § 3.) § 35738. Method af dlviding the bonded indebtedness �� Plans and recommendations may include a method of dividing the bonded --. indebtedness other than the method specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of —. - subciivision (b) of Section 3557b for the purpose of providing greater equity in •� _ the division. Consideration may be given to assess valuation, number of _ pupils, property values, and other matters which the petitioners or county � committee deems pertinent. �.. -� (Artded by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4020, § 3.) 279 -,- ; '1 ;,. �, . , �, �. � . ;� � � , 1� �%: .� � � :' � i Y � � § 35752 LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGF.IIICIES Tltle 2 (c) The persons designated in the petition as "chief petitioners." (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4020. § 3.) Historlcal and Statutory Notes Derivadon: Former § 35513, added by Stats. School C. § 2.150. 1976, c. 1010, p. 2384, § 2. PoI.C. § 1578, amended by Code Am. Educ.C.1959, § 1994, added by Stats.1963, c. 1873-74, c. 543, § 11; Stau.1889, c, 160, § 10; 629, § 4. Stats.1917, c. 486, § 1; Stats.1919, c. 91, § 1; Educ.C.1959, §§ 1746, 1811, added by Stats. Stats.1921, c. 596, § 1. 1959, c. 2, §§ 1746, 1811. Educ.C.I943. §§ 2456.1, 253I (Stats.1943, c. 71,), Stats.1945, c. 862, § 1. Cross Referencea Disirict saperintendents, see §§ 35026, 35028. Governing boards, see §§ 78, 35010, 35160 et seq., 39601 et seq., 72203.5, 81600 et seq. State board of education, see § 33000 e[ seq.: Const. Art. 9, § 7. I.ibrary References Schools �37(2). WES1'LAW Topic No. 345. C.J.5. Schools and School Districts § 42. Noces of Decisions ' In general 1 a school district from a union or joint-union Repreaentation 2 school district need not be complied with be- fore apptying che provisions of other scatutes which are all inclusive in respecc to proceed- 1. In general mgs for school district rearganizations. 14 Elementary school districc subject to union Ops.Atty.Gen. 220 (1449). district and not suspended From union could not escape obligations by creacing new elemen- tary district withouc petitioning withdrawal from union as whole. Slater v. Keesev (1930) 282 P. 1021, 102 C.A. 266. Where a change of school district boundaries is con[empiaced, provisions of statutes, percain- ing to changes of boundaries of school districts and procedure for withdrawal or exclusion of 2. Repr�aentation School district, which opposcd proposed boundary changes and which was unable to obtain representation by public attorney, could concract to be represenced before board of su- pervisors by private attornevs who could co(- lect for eheir services based on that contract. Barnatt ��. Hunt (1963) 35 Ca1.Rptr. 873, 223 C.A.2d SZ1. § 3�753. Approval by state board of educatlon; condltions (a) The State Board af Education may approve proposals for the reorgani- zation oE districis, if the board has determined, with respect to the proposal and the resulting districts, that all of the following conditions are substantial- ly met: ( ' . ��<��;_ W.ill b� adequ�te,, ett t� �,t�f= ��tber �€ p�l� � enroiied. �t��� s�h �z.� c� i�, basis ,of a substar�tia� cot�nt�it� i _ , _ ,��i�� :� e��it�� ..di,vi��. �.,��.x�4�.:,:. �,{ asid fa i i� i s oi �� � �� ���istrict or c�i��rfcts ° � �`:_ (4) The reorganization of the districts wi(1 not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation. 282 � � r� R D ii C f 5 -�►_ : � t � ,�. � -;;;�: � .� ;� .r ;�i-- � =�- REORGA11tIZATI011i—SCHOOL DISTRICTS § 35754 Div. 3 (5) The proposed reorganization witl not result in any substantial increase in costs to the state. (6) The proposed reorganization will not significantly disrupt the edu- cational programs in the proposed districts and districts affected by the proposed reorganization and will continue or promote sound education per- formance in those districts. (7) The proposed reorganization will not result in a significant increase in school housing cosis. (8) The proposed reorganization is not primarily designed to result in a significant increase in property values causing financial advantage to proper- ty owners because territory was transferred from one school district to an adjoining district. (9) The proposed reorganization will not negatively affect the fiscal man- agement or fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization. (10) Any other criteria as the board may, by reguiation, prescribe. (b) The State Board of Education may approve a proposal for the reorgani- zation of school districts if the board determines that it is not practical or possible to apply the criteria of this section literally, and that the circum- stances with respect to the proposals provide an exceptional situation suffi- cient to justify approval of the proposals. (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4020, § 3. Amended by Stats.1990, c. 1658 (S.B.1927), § 8•) Hlstorical and Statutory I�Totes Derivatlon: Former § 35512.1, added by Educ.C.1959, § 1993.I, added by Stats.1976, Stats.1977, c. 36, p. 303. § 434. c. 1042. § 5. § 35754. Approval or disappro��al of formation After affording interested persons an opportunity to present their views on the petition and after hearing any findings and recommendations of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, the State Board of Education shall approve or disapprove the formation of the proposed new district. If the board approves the formation, it may amend or include in the proposal any of the appropriate provisions of Article 3(commencing with Section 35730). (Added by Stats.1980, c. 1192, p. 4021, § 3.? liiatorical and Stawtory 1�Iotes Derivatlon: Former § 35514, added by Stats. 1976, c. 1010, p. 2384, § 2. Educ.C.1959, § 1995 added by Stats.1963. c. 629, § 4. Educ.C.1959, §§ 1747, 1748, 1813, enacted by Stats.1959, c. �, §§ 1747, 1748, 1813, amended by Stats.1961, c. 1806, § 4. Educ.C.1943. §§ 2457, 2458. 2533. (Stats. 1943, c. 71). PoI.C. § 1578, amended by Code Am. 1873�t, c. 543, § 11; Stats.1889, c. 160, § 10; Stats. 1917, c. 486, § 3; Stats.1919, c. 91, § 1; Stats. 1921, c. 596, § 1. PoI.C. § 1579, amended by Code Am. 1873--�, c_ 543. § 12; Stats.1917, c. 486, § 2. School C. §§ 2.127, 2.128, 2.152. 283 � )UCATION CODE r ies, for implementing ecvtmg the atrategies ior implemenrzcion o: 9 pADils fro �W'�eanne on af�al[ be fimited�to atng� to thteacen the shed aurauant to chis o�A�cipal of the 1_R�D R3C1¢-t�C12t2d :8950. - - In any event, the plan �ca, laav enforcemen4 ng e�ating t�eeources, �snt to Chapter 2.5 e that achoot� use the rogt�n entitled "Safe an for school safety. :oneultan� to develop ade avnilable through �de. � EDUCATION CODE Chapter 4 § 35735 REORGAIVIZATION OF SCHOOL DISTBICIS Article 1 REORGANIZATION OF SCHOOL DLSTRICTS SY THE ELECTORATE 3 35704. Exaenination of petition; transmittal The caunty anperintendent of achools, wit,hia 20 daye after a�n,�y petition for reorganiTation is filed, ehall pYnminp �� petition and, if he or ahe finds it W be su�aent an� eigned as requIIed by law, tranemit ua petition aimultaneonely to the crounty committee and ta the State Board of Edacaiion. (Amended by Stata.i994, c. 11�6 (S.B.lb37), 4 6.) • ... .. _ ^ . . • - � 35707. 1�ammittal of petitioa and eeeoma�endatio�u to•�tals�board ot eduestion; report- •_ �� Exeept for petitione far the ttineEer of te:ritoey, the rnanty cortunitEee ehsll forthwith t�aaamit the petition to the Stste Board of Eduation together avith ita recammpndatione thereon: � IL ehaII aleo report ahether any of the follawing, in the opittion of the conunittee, wouid ba trae regarding the prcpoeed reorganizatioa a� described in Lhe petition: : (1) It would advetsely affect Ne achoo! district organiration of the county. � (2) It would be compatible with any master plans aubmitted by the connty committee and approved by the State Board af Education. (3) It would comply with the provieiona of Section 357b3. (b) Petitiona for tranefera of tertitorY ehall be transmitted pu�uant to Section 35?04. (Amended by 3tata.1994, c. 1186 (S.B.1537}, § 7.} Article 2 COUNTY COMMITTEE ON SCHO(?L DISTRICT ORGANIZATION PLAN3 AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DISTRICT REORGANIZATION V]SIOYS ion 3�i00) shall apply �R�d district �hool district become iaries that are totallv ��cs if the rrovernvl � �v elementary schoo� � unifv, mav concinue e anv actfon to anifv �JI� w ♦ r f 3572'L. Adoption of fenal recominendation; trana�ittal to �tate board af education for hearinr; order Following the public hearing, or laat public hearing, requited by Section 35720.5 or subdivision (b) of Section 35721, the county committee may adopt a finai recomtnendation for uni5cation or other reorganizattort and shs11 trinamit ''' that recommendation together with the petition fited �nder subdivision (a) of Section 35721, if any, to the�`tate Board of Educatian for hearing ae pmvided in Article 4(commencing with Section 35700); or sk�all tranamit the petition to the State Baard of Education and order tha reorgani�ation Qranted if the requiremenrs of Section 35709 are satisfied; or ahall transm�c the �t��ition to the State Board of Education and order that an election be held if the requirements of Section 35710 are eatisfied. (Amended by Stat9.1994, c. 2186 (S.H.153�, § 8.J Article 3 � CONTENTS OF PLANS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Section Section 35735. Compnration of base revenue limit per necessary facilities; ac�juetmeata; unit of average daily attendance. ]apse of diatrict; appli�aon 3bT36•1. Base revenue limit per unit of avenge �7�,g, �efer of aeventh and eighth grade daily attendance. P�p� be�n an etemenrary and 3673a2. Base revenue limit per onit of average �gh achool diatrict; revenue appor- daily attendaace of newly organized diatricrs; district unable to provide tionmen� . ::,. , '•: �35T35. Computation of base revenue limit per unit of averase daily attendance ,';�,��i Each propoeal for the reorganirition of schooi diatricts ahali incfude s compatation of the baee ���a►ne limit per unit of average daily attendauce for the distiicta. That computation ehall be an inkegisl """ AddRlons or Ch�nq�s IndlaNd by und�rlin�: d�l�tions by �M�rbks • r w �' 21 part of the proposal and ahall nat be coneidered aepantely from the proposal. The computation of the baee revenue lirait for the newiy organized achool diatricta shall be baeed on the current information available for each a�'ected schooi diattict for the eeoond prinapal apportionment period for the fiscai year two yeara prior ta the fiscal year in whicl� the �organizstion ie to become effective. The computation of any adjuetmenta for employee ealariee and benefits ahail be based on infotmation from the fiacal year two yeare prior to the fiscal year in which the reorganirstion is to become eSective. For the�purposea of this article "affected echool distric�' means a echool dietrict affected by a reorganirstion• becanse all or a poraon of ita average da�y attendance ia W be includad in the neavly organized e�hool districts. (b) The county euperintendent of echools ehall campute the base revenue limit per unit of aversge daily atteadance pmauant to. 8eetfon 86736.1 for a echool diatrict imolved in an action W reorganize and in an acLion ta trmmefer territrng. ,, : � . . . _. .. ,. ._ ._ . (c) The Stite DepartrneM of Educ�tion ehall uee infortnatton provided pursuant to subdiviaion (a) by the coaaty euperintendent of echoola in each county thst has a �chaol district affeeted by an action to imify or by an appeal of a teamter o[ territory to rnmpute the base :evenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for s ne�aly �m�ganised achool diatrict pnraaant to Section 35735.1. •-. (d) This eection s6all not..apply to any reorganization prnpoeal approved by the State Board of Education prior W Jannary 1, 1996. � � (e) Any coata incurted by the rnunty auperintendent of echoola in preparing reporta pmsuant to this section or Section 35735.1 or 35735.2 may be billed to the affected school di�tricts an a proportionate baaie. _ (Added by Stata1994, c. 1186 (S.B.la3�, ¢ 10.) Hiiterical and StaWtory Note� 199� Le�idation Deri�ation: Former 4 3b?35, added by Stab.1980, a Pormv 4 8673b wu repealed by Stata.1994, e 1186 1192. 4 3, amended by Ststs.1989. c. 82, 4�: Stata.1989, c. (3.8.163'n, € 9. See, na�v� ihis rection 83� 5 4. 4 35735.1. Base revenue liatit per nnit of average daily attendance (a) The base revenue litdit per unit of average daily aUendance for newly organize� schaol districts shall be equal to the tot�l of the amoant of blended revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance of the affected school districts computed pursuant to paragraph (1), the amount based on salaries and benefita of classified employeea computed ptusuant to paragnph (2), the amounc based on saiaries and benefite of certificated employeea caiculated pursuant to paragraph (3), and the amount of the inflation adjustment calculated pu:auant to paragraph (4). The following compatations shall be made to determine the base revenue limit per unit of avenge daily actendance for the newly organized school districts: (1) Divide the average daily attendance computed pursuant to Section 42238.o inco the base revenue limit computed piusuant to Section 42xi8 for each affected district, and then perform the following camputation to arrive at the blended revenue limi� (A} For each school diatrict affected by the reorganization, mtiltiply the amount determined pursuant to paragraph (1) by the number of unita of average daily attendance for that school d'utrict that the councy superintendent of schools detereninea will be included in the propoeed school di�tricK. (B} Add the amounts calcu]ated pursuant to subpaiagraph (A). (2) For each affected achool di�ttict for wt►ich the employment of 25 percent or mare of the classified full-time equivalent employees of the district is attributable W average daily attendance that the county superintendent of schools determinea will be included in the newly organized school districts, che following computation ehall be made to determine the amount to be included in the base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for the newly organized school districts that is based on the salaries and � benefits of claaeified employees: i I (N For each of those achool districts, make the following computation to amve at the highest average �+ amount expended for salarie9 and benefits far classified full-time employees by the districts: � (i) Add the amount of all ealaries and benefits for class�ed employees of the district, including both j part-tirne and full-time employeee. $DUCATION CODE # •+ F(Cf For eaeh of thaee eehool distr. -- �hbparagraPh (A) from the amount ic �' �(D) For each of thoee eclwol distr �r �ubparagraph (� ,by the number of , aad thea multip�y by the percentage ` di�trict 3(E) Add the amounts oompnted foi •?{8) Far each'atfected �chool di�tric! . �Il-tune eq�ivabat emNcYee� of tAe �uperintendent ui �chooL daterminc .�llowing co�npa'�stioa rhall be made t nnit of average dailY sttendauoe.for t. be�ie6ta of certisc�ted e�nP�Y� - ��� Fo=.�e�eh- a�:tvoie �ehool dis ^ ivaage amaont expended far ealarie =: �(�' Add .the amonnt of all ealaries c „ 11�ll-titne employeea. �.(u� D'mde the amount determined ; employeee in the diettict - " (B) Compate-.the amounta det�xr identify the t�est sveraQe ataoai ~ (G9 For e�ch of thae rchool di�t �= tnbpatsgraph (� �a�a the amonnt . �:' ;a (D) Fbr eirlt' aI thae �chooi dirt �;, mbparag�sph (G� bY tbs m�mbn� of :. them m�ltiply bY the Pereentage of � diatrici . - � : (E) Add. tM amauit da�Lted "(4) The ba�e e�e�enne Wcdt per � � follows: . (N Add the amannts determined P�B�P�► (2). aad suhparagnph (f average daily atta�dance in the nev this aubpara�sph ehall not exceed attendanca c�Culated pureuant to p (H) Increase the amount determ actjuatment calculated and ueed for yeac immediate�y' P��B � Y� (G� Increa�e the �aonnt determ adjuatmmt tgle�lated and ueed [or year in which the reorgnniration be � (D7 Increa�e the atnrnmt deteim: baae revenue limit per unit ot aver have beer. eli�ble to receive had tt: which the i�organiration bet�mes t (b) The uaount determined pu:s the baee revenne limit per unit of (e) The baee revenue limit per nr �hall nat be•greater than the amwt State Board of Educstion The � tevenue limit apportionmenta to a r tneata to be coneiatent with this ae (d) If the tecrltorial juriedictioa tion, or other reorganirstlon, ocenr. a larger teaitnrial juriediction tF reorganization o[ schaol dietricte AddRions or ehanp�s I,(u) Divide the amount computed in clsuae (i) by the total number of full-time equivalent classified � employeea in the distric� � (B) Compare the amounts determined for each of those school districta parsuant to subparagrdph (A) � and idencify che highest average amount expended for salaries and benefits for clasa�ed employees. AddRlons or ehanp�s Indiqt�d by und�rllnr, d�l�tionc by asl�rlsks "•• � _ 22 �- � �'� �TION CODE `_ �UCATION CODE mputation oF the rent information �r the fiscal yeaz e computation ot e fisCal yeaT two piu'poaea of this �ecause all or a school districts. of average daily �nize and in an bdiviaion (a) by bY an action to of avetage daily �tate Boatti of '�n'susnt to this � P�Porcionate �y 9t�tta.1980, c. a: Su�.isss, �. chaol districts attendance of i ealaties and ❑ salarie� and i the inflation � to determme �ool districts: base revenue �he iallawmg �ed pursuant rict Lhat the �t. he classified .c the councy listricLs, the �ve limit per salaries and �est avenge •luding both �t classified ragraph (A) empioyees. § 35735.1 �. ��or each of thoee echool diatricta, subtract the amount determined for the diatrict pvrsuant to graph (A? from the amount identified pu�uant to eubparagtaph (B). ° �-. (b) For each of those achool districLi, multiply the amount determined for the dietrict puranant to , �.r: �tiparigraph (G� by the number of full-time equivalent clasei5ed employeea employed by the diatrict, �ad then muitiply by the percentage of the diatrict'a sverage daily uttenaance W be included in the new di�trict : .• �, . � y�(E) Add the amounts computed for each nchool di8trict pursuauL to anbparagraph (D). � t(E) For �ch aPfected echool diatrict for which the employment of 2b pee�cent or more of the ce�cated "�-tame equivaient employeea of tha district is ataibut�ble W avera�e da�1y attet►danae thai the county +pertntendent of echool� dete�rmir►ee will he included in the newly organized echool diatricts, ihe ! �Wowing compufatioa ahall be made to determine the amount to be included ia the baee rEvenue limit per onit of avenge daily attendance for the newly organized achool diatricta that is baeed on the ealaries and • b�ne6ta of certiticated employeea: ; '��-.(eU� For_ each of thoee achooI districts. make the following. cnmputation ta determine the higheet j mrage amonnt e�ended for aalariea and heneEts for certi8cated 11il1-time empIoyeee: . N.. �. • - _ � � �_ (D Add the amount of all ealaries and benefita for ceiti8cated employeea. including both parFtime aad � � !bl[ time employeea. .(a'? Divide the amuunt determined in clauae (i) by the total number of full time equivalent certificated empioyees in the diatrict (B) Compare the amounts determined for each school diatrict puisuant to subpara�aph (t� and identify the higheat average amount expended for saiariee and benefita for certiFicated employeee. (C} For each of those nchool diatricta, subhact the amount determined for the diattiet pureuant to �nbparag�ph (A) from the amount identified putsuant to eubparagnph (By. �.-•(D) Far each o[ thoee echool districts, multiply the amoont determined for the diah�ict purenant to enbparagraph (L� by the numba of fiill-tiune equivaletit certiti�ated employeea of the echool diatrict, and then multiply by the petceatage of the district's aversge daily nttendance w be included in the neav diatrict �(E) Add the atnonnt calculsted far esch school diatrict identified pnrnuant to enbparagraph (D). (4) The bare revenne limit per unit of average da�y attendance ehall be acjjjuated far intiation aa foDaova: (� Add the amaunts determined pu�uant ta aubpatagtapb B) of paragrap� (1), subpaesgraph {E) of patagrlph (2), and subparagraph (E) of pa�graph (3), and divide that eum by the nntnber of units of averdge daily attendance in the newly organized echool dietricta. The arnount determined purauant to thie euhparagiaph ahall not exoeed 11Q percent of the blended tevenue limit per unit of average daily attendance calculated pursuant to pacagraph (i). (B) Increase the amount determined putanant to eubparagraph U) by the amount of the inflation ac�justment calculatzd and used for apportionment purpoaea p�reuant to Section 42238.1 for the fiscal year immediately preceding the year in which the reorganization becomPs effective. (G� Increaee the amonnt determined pursoant to eubparagraph (B) by the amount of the inflation u�justment eslculated and vaed for apportionment pnrpoeea pnrsuant co Section 42xi8.1 for the fiaeal year in which the reorganiration 6ecomea effective for all purpnaea. (D) Incresee the amount deternsined pu�uant to subparagraph (C) by any other adjuatmenta to the baee revenue limit per unit of average da�7y attei►dance that the newiy oiganized achool diatricta would have been eligble w receive had they been reorga�sized in the fiscal yesr two yeais prior to the year in mhich the reorgani�tion becomea effective for all purpoeea. (b) The amount deteimined puxsuant to aubparagraph (D) of patagraph (4) of aubdivieion (a} ehall be the base revenne limit per unit o[ average daily attendance for the newly organized echool dietricta. (c) The baae revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for the newly organized echool district ahall not be greater than the amonnt eet farth in the propoeal for reorganization that is approved by the 5tate Board of Education. The Superincendent af Pnblic Inetruction may make adjuatment9 to baae revenue limit apportionmenta to a newly orgas►ized achool diattict, if necessa�y W cauae those apportion- mente to be coneietenc with this section. (d) If the territorial juriediction of eny echool district wae revised pureuant to a uni5i�tion, consolida- tion, or other reorganization, occurring on or befare July 1, 1989, that resulted in a echool district having a larger territoriai juriadiction than the originsil echoot dietrict prior to the reurgani�tion, and a reorganization of echoot diatricts occura on or aft�er the e�ective date of tF►e act that added thia AddRtons or ch�np�a Indlcat�d by und�rllnr, dd�tions by a�tKl�ks *•' 23 § 35735.1 EDUCATION CODE subdiviaion that resulta in a achool district having a territorial juriediction that ie eubstantially the eame, ( ae determined by the State Board of Education, aa the ten�iWrial ,jurisdiction of that original achool diatrict prior W the moet rec�ent reorganirstion occ�ring on or before July 2, 198.9, the revenue lunit of � the achool dietsict resulting fmm the eubseqnent reorganization ahall• be the sasae, notWithstanding sabdiviaion (b), aa the revenue iimit thaL was determined for the origuial echaol district prior to the moet reaent reorganitation oaurru�g on or before July 1, 19�9. � (e) The average da�1y �ttendauce of a nealy organised school diatrict, for purpoeer of eubdiviaian (d) of Section 42x38, shall be the aveesge daily attendauae that ia atMbut�hte to the area reorganized for the � fiec�l year two ye�rs prior to the fiscal year in which the new district becomea e8ective for all ptupaeee. (n For purpoeee of compututg sverage da�y attendance pmauant to aubdivieion.(d) of 3ection d2zi8 for each school diattiet thst e�data prior to the reorganization and whoee average da�7p atte�ndauce is directiy ' affected by the t�organnation, the following eatcnhtion ehall app� for the tiaal year imo yeazs prior to the fiacal yetr in which the newly reorganised eehool disttici becwnea eSective: ' , r (1) Divide the 1987.-�i 8am1 year average daly attendance, computed putsuant w aubdivision (d) of Section 42�i8, by � the total average da�7y attendance of the diatrict p�uauant to 9ection 42zi8.fi. � (2I MultiPlY � P�� �Puted putauant to parage�aph (1) by the total average ds�1y attendance o[7he distrid purauant to 42xi8.6 excluding the avetsge da�7y attee►dance of pupila attrlbntzble to the area reorganized. (g) This section ahall not apply to any reorgania�tion prnpoaal approved by the State Board of , Education prior ta January 1, 1996. (h) Notwithetanding any other provieion of law, thie eection ehall not be subject w waiver by the State Board of Education purauant W Section 33050 or by the Superintendent of Public Inatruction. ; (Added by Stste.l99l, e. 1186 (S.B.153�, $ 11J � f 35735.2. Bue eevenue lunit per unit of a•erate daily attendsnce of ne�vly or�aniz� districts; dirtrid unable W provide nea�rar� fuilitid; adjtutmenb; lap�e of district; applica- tion i' (a1 If a newly organized achool d'atriet is unable to prwide the school facilittee neceaearY to provide inativctional eerviaa by employeee of the dietrict to all of the pnpile who are residente of thst di�trict dnring the t�l y�r in which the ieorganization becomes effective for all purpoeee, tt�e baee revenue limit per unit of average daily aue:►dance of the nealy organized diatrict shall be the blended revenue litnit arrived at pursusnt to paragraph (1) of aubdivieion (a) of Section 35735.1. Aa the newly orgatsized achool district se adjuated by the cslcalatione pniauant to aubpangcaphe (B), (C), and (D) of paragraph (�) of eubdiviaion (a) of 3ection 35735.1 and aubdiviaion (b) of Section 35T35.1 obtaina the echool facilities neceasary W prwide inatevctional eervices by employeee of the district to aU or a portion of thoee pupila, the following adjuatment ehall be made to the baee revenue limit per unit of avetage daily attendance of the district ea�h fisc�l year snbeequent to the fiscal year in which the reorgani�ation becomes effective until the fiacal year in which the diatrict prnvidee the facilities necessarY to provide choee aetvices for aU of thoae pupiIs: (1) Determine the totsl number of pupila who are reeidenta of the dietrict to whom the di�trict wae unable W provide school facilitiea neceeeary w provide that inetruction during the fiecal year in ahich the reorganization becomea effective for ail p�rpoeee. {2) Determine the tota! number of puptla identified in pazagraph (1) that will sttend achool in school facilities located ia, and receive inauvetional aeivices provided by employces of, that diatrict in the current fiscel year. ' i3) Divide the mm�ber determined purauant to paragraPh (2) by the number determined purauant to paragnph (1) to determine the peroentage of pupile identi8ed in paragraph (17 who will attend achool in school facilities located in, and receive inetructional servicee provided by employeee of, that district in the cursent fiacal year. (4) Multiply the numbeis determined piusuant to paragraphe (Z) and (3) of euhdiviaion (a) of Sectian 35735.1 by the percentage determined pursuaat W paragraph (3) for thst fiscal year, and total the amounts. Divide that aiun by the number of units of average daily attendance reeiding in the proposed dietrict in the enreent fiscal yeat. (� Incresee the baae revenve limit calculated pursuant to aubdiviaion (a) of thia eection for the school dietrict by the nmount arrived at pureuant W pangraph (4) aa ac�jneted by the calailations purauant W subparagraphe t8}. (C), and (D) of paragraph (4) of aubdivieion (a) of Section 35735.1. In no event s�all the amonnt detr�tnined pureuant to thie para�aph exoeed that amount that would otherwiee be calculated puisuant to subdivieion (a) of 5ection 3b73b.1. AddMlaa or clanp�s indlcabd br und�rlln�: d�l�tlona by �si�rlaks ••• 2�4 �� � � . EDUCATION COD � � (b) For the purpose: �cLool di�trict reqnired � pupil� by grade level a � to tbe bare revenne lics c (�) of Section 8b73b.1. pro►ide inetrnctional eE i�nn� and in the tin Bard of Education, � 5npe�'intendent of Put �:. thae pnpil�. The co !' prep�eation of the iep� �_ appo�tioaments w the ' (e) If t2►e newiY cr6; � insteuctional servioes t yeat� hvtn t6e date on � � ot Edw�tion �hall rec " laped p�suant W Art n�alae that reeammend: neoereaiy tc.provide � eeeidenta of the diatsi . Edneation. the State f to lapse the echooi di: 36780). (d? �+ �pn ah Edncation p�ru�r Lo Ja l�dded trY Sta4•1991, ; -=6TSS3. Tr�nder •' " "' ". � No t�.;.,afeR of �eves dirtrict ihall re�ult in aooeeda lOb percent o diatrict. (Added by Stata.1994, APPRO 4 35753. Approval b ta� The State Bosr bou�d has deteanine� coaditions ue �ub�tai (1) The new disttic (29 The dietricta ar i3) The prnposal w districts. N) The reorganizai (� The PmPaeed (67 The proponed r di�tricta and district education performanc (� The proposed (8) The prnpoaed n valuee caneing finana aistrict to an ad joinir Addltlons CODE . '�iEDUCATION CODE the eame, �al echool ie limit of to the moet aion (d) of �ed for the � purpoeee. i`42xi8 for ie directly is ,prior to �� - uon (d) of o l7138.b. ble to the ?,--• ' Board of the State .� districts; vw.� . to Dlbvi ieveaue taenue '�iuee pupils, ;endance of ei eQective !icea for all lis�ict �vas 4 whiCh the 17srn =. ; e iTin achoal rict ur the renant to achool in ict in the § 35753 (b) For the pnrpoeee of maldng the ac�juetmenta deacribed in eubdiviaion (a), the annual audit of the eehool diatrict required pursoant to Section 41020 ahall include aa audit of the average daily attendanae of pupila by grade level and the numbe� of certfficated and claeeified empioyeee on which the adjuetmenta w the base revenue limit of the district weee made puxnoant W paragraphe (1), (2), and (3) of eubdivision (a) of Section 35735.1. Untii the newiy organized echool district providea the echool faalitiea neaeeary to prwide inatrnctionai eervioee by employeea of the district to pnpils who are residenta of the dietrict in the maaner and in the timefr�mee eet forth fn t�he propoeal to reorganiu that �vae approved bq the State Boaed of Educstion, the county superintendenc of echaole ehall, for eaeh fiecal year, inform the Superintendent of Pnblic Inatruction of the extent to which the diatrict ia providing thoee facilif3es to thoee pnpile. The connty superintendent of achoo}a msy charge the echool diatsict for "the coat of preparation of the report. Ba�ed on that information, the enperint�►dent ehati make baae revenue limit appo'onmenta W the echool diatrict in a n�er conaiatent with eubdivieion (a). (c) If the ne+viy organized echaol di�trict ia unabk to pirovide the echool faci7itiee neceseary to provide instivct{onal �eavices by employees of the diettict to aIl of the pup�7e who aee re�idenb of the distriet five yeare frora the date on which the reorganirstion becomea e�ective for all purpoeea. the State Departmeat of Educstion shall recommend to the 3tate Boord of Ednmtion �viietha or not tha dietriet ehonld be l�peed Ptu�uant Lo Arti�le 6(comtnenang with 3ection 3b78Q). The State Depattmeat of Edu��tion shall malce that �commendation !or each Ssc�l yar an� either the achool di�triet•pmvides the ecimoI fac�litie� necessary to prnvide inettnetionai eervices by employcee of the di�trlct to all ot- the pupi7e who� are t�eaidenta o[ the diattict or the diatrict ia lapeed. Upon recommendation by the 3tate Deparlmart of Educatian, the State Board of Education map ditect the rnunty cotnmittee on echoo2 district organization to iapee the school diatrict according to the procedures eet forth in Articie 6(commencing with Section 35780). (d) Thia section ehall not apply to any reorganization propoeai �pproved by the State Sonrd oI — Education prior to January 1, 199b. . (Added by Stata.1994, c. 1186 (59.163�, g 12) _ � 35735.3. 'handes of ie�enkh and ei�hth �rad� PnPiL between an danentar� aad hi�h �chooi di�trict; rnenue apportionmeat � . . - -- No tranefer of eeventh and eighth gi�ade pap�7e bet�veen an elementa�y eclwol dietrict and a high echool diatrict ahall result in the receiving diatrict receiving s�venue limit �h,,, .„ .:,,,,�, ent for thoee pup�7e t1�at exceede lOb percent of the etatewide average revenue limit for the type and eiza of the receiving eehooi dietr'ict (Added by Stata.1994, a 1186 (S.B.153'n, § 13.) Article 4 APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF PLAN3 AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 35753. Approval by �tate board of education; conditioni (a) The State Board of Education may approve prcpoeala for the reoigani7ation of di��icts, if the board has determined, with reepect to the prnposal and the ieeniting dietricta, that all of the following conditiona are aubatsntially met (1) The new districta w�11 be adequate in terme of number of pupila enrolled. (� The distncta a�e each organized oa the baeis of a eubstantial comm�uity identity. (3) The proposal will reault in an equitable d'maian of property and fac7itiee of the original dietrict or dietricts. (4) The reorgani�ation of the districts will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or eegiegation �f Section (6) The propoeed reorganization will not reault in any aubatsntial increaee in costs to the etate. t0�� �e i (6) The propo�ed reorganiration will not aignificantly disrupt the educational programs in the propoeed pr°p°eed ' diatricts and districts affected by the proposed reorganization and will continue u promote sonnd � edacntion perfarmance in those districts. �chool . (� The m aed reo i�t � p po iganiration will not result in a eignificant inaeaae in school houaing ccnta. t ahall (8) The proposed reorgani�stion is not primarily deaigned to result in a eigni5cant incteaee in prnpErty iee be values causing financiat advantage to prnperty ownere because terriWry wae ttansferted from one school diatrict to an adjoining di�trict ' � Addklon� or ehanq�t Indlcat�d by und�riln�; dN�tlonf by ast�rialu '•• 25 JAN-12-1996 11�37 FROM RCOE-Infc. TecF�nolog� TO 91619�417�98 ��r✓ � B. P�acess: Qufck �tefereace Chart V-2 TERRFCORY '�'KA�TSFERS IlYTI7ATED BY � TO P�tCENT PETTTiON O�t CLIUNTY C4MM17"t'EE (See Flawchart V-2.) P.04 1. Initiat�on of Pro�osa�s fo� Te�ritory Tr�nsfe� (�C �5720, 35721) a. Yetitioct signed by �0 pereent o�th� r�gisoered voteca o�' ��e encixe sc�aoJ district or � b. County committEe plans and recommcndad.ons 2. Pmiimin�ary Heariag of Peritioa (EC 3572�) a. Couaty committee must hold a public heari�qg vf a 10 percent �ot�x pe�l.ti.on. b. Following the hcaring, tbe couuty comnuttce must gravt o�r dcny the �oki.tion. c. i�th� petitian is praAted, thr catu�ty cammi.t�ee m�ast adn�t tentative pla�s �nd recammeadatidns. 3. Public Hea�ings (FC 357U5, 35705.5, 3572Q.5, 35721): A, pnblic hearing in each ' aff��te.� diRtrict mu�t be beld by the county cammittee within 60 days of adopcing plans aud recommeadations. 4. CEQA 12eview (Public Resources Code 21000-21177j: 'Ttta county cornmi.�tee musc dct�rmine the impact rhat the t�rritory transfer will have on ti�e envi�onme�t and hal.d public heariags in canjuncti.on with the raor�aaizaaon hcaring. 5. CoUAty Gammittce Stndy �f the Tetritory Trana�r (EC 35722, 35709, 3S710): Titis count�r cammittee stady must determine the impaet of the tenitory txans�er an c�e critena li�ted in E.0 33733. G. Ap�oval l'roccss (EC 35709, 3571,0, 35722) a. J�1.1 terrirnry tr�r�:sfers are settied at the local level. b. WitJ�in 120 days o�the fust public headng, the cou.nty commi#tee m�st approve ar di,sappravc the petitioa. c. Xi' cither of' tt�e fUlluwiug two canditivna are mct� thc caunry co�naittee may approve the urritoxy txansfrx wichout an eYection: 1) Thc ter.ritory is unini�abited arui the owmers canseat ta the Cransfcr and the gaverniag boards of all �ffected districts rnnsettt ta the tran�fer. �) 'i'i,e terricor� is inhabiud and the te�nritory is less thaa 10percent of the as�essed valuatxon of the district and �he govcming boards of a11 affected distri.clr, cnncent d, k'or all cther tenitory transfers, if the covnty comrni.ttc� a�pxoves the transter, the county su�eri�ttendeat mnst caU an elece�on zn che araa as deter.minecl by chc county commxttee. v.� ,. � ATTACHMENT 4 `i�rr�' � CITY OF PALM DE5ERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEYELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: City Manager and City Council through City Attorney / � � ? ` ,'�r t�' _ ' � <<^ _ ! r t'" � '�±t (�^ Assistant City ManagerlDirector of Community Development June 29, 1995 SUBJECT: School District Boundary Alteration During the budget study sessions council requested staff to examine the possibility of having the entire City of Palm Desert in one school district. Currently, the portion of the city north of Frank Sinatra Drive is within the Palm Springs Unified School District (PSUSD). The remainder of the city is within the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD). Until a short time ago portions of the city in the Cahuilla Hills were within PSUSD. After extensive study, hearings, and negotiations between both districts these areas were placed into DSUSD. The changing of district boundaries is qoverned by the Education Code. In the case of uninhabited areas the action can be initiated as follows: 35740(b) The owner of the property, provided that territory is uninhabited and the owner thereof has filed either a tentative subdivision map with the appropriate city or county agency or an application for any project, as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources Code with one or more�local agencies. (c) A majority of the members of the governing boards of each of the districts that would be affected by the proposed reorganization. The petition is filed with the County Superintendent of Schools. The process is then conducted and directed by the County of Superintendent of Schools. I have attached a memorandum prepared by the city attorney's office in addressing the Cahuilla Hills area boundary transfer. As can be seen and experienced, the process can be long and cumbersome . However, particularly in the case of uninhabited area transfers, there is one greater problem. The potential prablem is identified in the attached memo page 3 and item IX-2. 1 . � � CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL , SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY ALTERATION JUNE 29, 1995 The question at this juncture is do we wish to go further with this issue? And if so, how? It should be noted that currently there are inter-district transfer aqreements between both districts, as well as agreements on current boundaries. �� �- t RAMON A. DIAZ AS5ISTANT CITY MANAGER, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING /tm 2 LAW OFFICES OF BEST, BEST 6 KRlEC�irr�t June 1, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: Ray Diaz, City of Palm Desert Dave Erwin, City Attorney��l� Education Code �,.� R���k�r�L� �' ��` ' � 1S95 fOMM�y( P��EICP��Hi f.EvaRiMfHI 0 Pe; pE�FF,1 Ray: Attached you will find the Education Code sections, toqether with the supplemental updates, regarding the procedural steps required for petitioninq a transfer of property between school districts. Please let me know if you would like to discuss these materials. DJE/vcd attachments �^ . �: • :. �- � -. t" `; N ` �r ;C ; � `} � -� N . r� S�� � DJE67998 � IrfEMORANDUM .��� T0: �,DSE FROM: JOHN PINKNEY. � DATE: June 17, 1991 RE: WESTINGHOUSE DESERT COI�IUNITIES, INC. PETITION FOR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY BETWEEN SCHOOL DISTRICTS � As per your request, I have put toqether an outline of the procedural steps required for petitioninq a transfer of property between school districts. I. An action to reorganize school districts is initiated by filinq, with the county superintendent of schools, a petition to reorganize one or more districts signed by the owner of the property. (Ed. Code, § 35700(b)). II. The petition must designate no more than three chief petitioners, who will receive notice of hearings to be held on the petition. (Ed. Code, § 35701). III. A petition may include any of the appropriate provisions specified in Section 35730 of the Education Code. (Ed. Code, $ 35703). IV. Within 20 days after the petition is filed, the county superintendent of schools shall examine the petition and if it is sufficient and properly siqned, the superintendent will simultaneously transmit the petition to the county committee and State Board of Education. (Ed. Code, $ 35704). � JXP12521 -1- C � � V. Within 60 days of receiving the petition, the county committee is required to hold one or more public hearings at a reqular or special meeting in each district affected by the petition. Notice will be given at least 10 days in advance to the chief petitioners, the qoverning board of all districts affected, and to all others requesting notice. (Ed. Code, § 35705). VI. The county committee has discretion to amend the petition by addinq any appropriate provision specified in Education Code sections 35730 to 35738. VII. At least 10 days prior to the public hearing, the county committee shall make available to the public and the qoverninq boards, a description of the petition iricluding the followinq: 1. The rights of the employees in the affected districts to continued employment. 2. The revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for each affected district and the effect of the petition, if approved, on such revenue limit. 3. Whether the districts involved will be governed, in part, by provisions of a city charter and, if so, in what way, 4. Whether the governing bodies of any proposed new district will have 5 or 7 members. 5. A description of the territory or districts in which the election, if any, will be held. � JXP 12521 -2- � � 6. Where the proposal is to create two or more districts, whether the proposal would be vcted on as a single proposition. 7. Whether the governing board of any new district will have trustee areas and, if so, whether the trustees will be elected by only voters of that trustee area or by the voters of the entire district. 8. A description of how the property, obligations and bonded indebtedness of existing districts will be divided. 9. A description of when the first governing board of any new district will be eiected and how the terms of office for each new trustee will be determined. (Ed. Code � 35705.5). VIII. Within 120 days of the commencement of the first public hearing, the county committee shall approve or disapprove a petition for the transfer of territory. IX. If the following conditions are met, the committee may approve the petition and order that the petition be granted: 1. The county committee finds that the conditions enumerated in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of section 35753 are substantially met, and: 2. The petition is to transfer uninhabited territory from one district to anather and the owner of the territory and the governinq boards of all school � JXP12521 -3 � . � � a districts involved in the transfer consent to the transfer. (Ed. Code S 35709�. rxv12521 —4— ATTACHMENT 5 119NUTES �c-. REGUiAR PAL1Vi DESERT CITY COUNCII. MEETIl�IG AUGUST 24� 1995 s s s s s« s• s s s« s s�*• s s*• s• s•• s s• s s••• s �•* Public Employx Pe�ormana Evaluadon pursuant to Section 54957 T'itie of Position: City Manager Security of Public Services or Facilitics Consultatioa with: Sheriff s Departmeqt and Building Department C. C1TY CLERK 1. � Reschedulin¢ of Joint Ciry CounciUPlanning Commission Meeting. Mrs. Gilligan suggested that thc joint mafing schoduied for September 22, 1995, be changed to Octabcr 18, 1995. Mayar Crit�s responded that tha Councilmembers wouid loa�C at their calcndars duris�g tiie d'snner reccss and woald let t►cr know whether this date was acceptable. Mrs. Giiligan notod that the 7ehn Seward sculptun entifled "Hest Seller" which had ban on display by the iagoon in the Civic Center Park would be takcn back by the artist who nadod it in a show. Upoa qvestian by Council refativt to purchasing the piecx, Mrs. Gilligan nesponda! that it would be at a cost of 5120�000. Council declined. D. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CIT'Y COUNCIL � ► .� � : :� .� � ; � � i ]. Discussion of One School District Haandary for Palm Desert (Mayor Buford A. Crites and Councilman Robert A. Spiegel). Councilman Spiegel stated that Palm Deseri is part of two differenc school aisrricts, Desert Sands and Palm Springs. Ho ask�ed that staff talce a look at this arid came back with a recammendation as to how this can be changc�. Mayar Crites stated that this had ban looked at and that Council needod to dic+ect staff to move forward in terms of the cliscnssions. He added that therr is not a pmblem yet becausa almost cvcrything that would be includod in the Pa�m Springs district is undeveloped lar�d. Coancil cancurred to direct staff to move farward with this. 2�3 �� ATTACHMENT 6a �.: CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMURANDUM TO: CARLOS ORTEGA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: PHILIP DRELL, DIRECTOR OF C41�iMtJNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: MARCH 6, 1997 SUBJECT: PR4JECT REVENUES F�R P.S.U.S.D. FROM PR0IECT AREA #2 PASS-THROUGH AGREEMENT Please provide a written anaiysis (andlor critique) of Public Economic Inc.'s Pass-Through Ageement revenue projections involving P.S.U.S.D.'s territory narth of Frank Sinatra Drive. We need a realistic forecast in order to determine how much can be committed to Palm Springs for not serving the area and how much would be left over for Desert Sands to provide educational services. The council is pressuring us for some sort of resolution and we need this information to proceed. I have tentatively scheduled a meeting af the counciUstaff sub-committee for March 18th. It would be helpful if the analysis was available for discussion at that meeting. PHILII' DRELL DIRECTQR OF COMIVIUNITY DEVELOPMENT cc: Ray Diaz, City Manager PD/db ATTACHMENT 6b � 1 DATE: TO: FROM: SU BJECT: � � PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM MARCH 19, 1997 �������D �`.. � , � � .. A� �997 CuM�1��fJi?Y �:}'�e.I:WMEra; :J��:A�Tt�fEN7 C�TY ilF Pp�.A� �'rSciiT PHILIP DRELL, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CARLOS L. ORTEGA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PROJECT AREA NO. 2 PASS-THROUGH AGREEMENT REVENUE FOR PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT We are writing this memo to you to clarify certain request contained in your memo dated March 6, 1997, in regard to the ongoing negotiations between yourself and the Palm Springs Unified School District (PSUSD) and the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD). Dennis and I were ready to discuss this matter of the meeting of March 17. We have reviewed the revenue projections calculated by Pub�ic Economics, Inc. We find that their arithmetic calculations are correct but their assumptions are not in line with historical data available on this Project Area. The Project Area has not experienced a 5% growth rate in country club, single family, office, industriai, and retail development over the life of the project since adoption. There are no entitlements for new projects given by the City Council, or any building permits on file that would support such projections. Furthermore, the projections make the assumption that the PSUSD's share of the tax revenues will increase to 17.58°/o in the next 20 years. The historical data shows that the highest that the PSUSD's share of the Project Area tax revenues has been 3.176% in Fiscal Yea� 1994/95. The current share for PSUSD for this fiscal year is 2.37%. The assumptions that the District's share will increase to 17.58 %, and that we will experience 5% growth per year for 20 years inflate the amount of the revenue which is projected to be passed through to them. You stated in your memo that you need a realistic forecast (of the revenue projections) in order to determine how much can be committed to PSUSD and what would remain for DSUSD. We have supplied you with the last set of calculations that were perFormed by Rosenow Spevacek Group (RSG) for our bond issued in June of 1995. Whenever the Agency has needed revenue projections (tax increment) for either bond issues or plan adaptions, we have hired consultants to do this for us. Please note that in order for the consultants to do this they will need to sit down with both the Community Development staff and the Building Department staff to answer questions about entitlements and building permits that pertain to the Project Area in order to formulate the projections. We suggest � the consultants calculate revenue projections based on each school district's boundaries. This might assist you in your assessments ofi what is available for both districts. With regard to how much can be cammitted to PSUSD and DSUSD, if you are referring to tax increment, the only monies that can be committed to either District is that which is provided through the pass-through agreements. We will be happy to give you the name of firms who provide consultant services for tax increment projections. If you have any other questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us. �c`�'���� �- Carlos L. Orte� Executive Director mh cc: City Manager � 2 ATTACHMENT 6c CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPAR2MENT OF CDI�iUNITY DEVELOPMENT M£MORANllUM TO: City Manager, Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Philip Drell, Director of Community Development DATF: September 13, 1996 SUBJECT: Update on Status of Palm SpringsfDesert Sands Schaol District Boundary Changes An economic consultant working for the PSUSD has completed a study analyzing the patential loss of revenue to the District resulting from the transfer of the area north of Frank Sinatra to Desert Sands. These revenues include develaper fees and property tax increment from the Project Area Na. 2 pass-thraugh agreement. While the consultant used base data supplied by the City, his extremely aptimistic assumptions concerning develapment and assessed valuation grawth rates and canfusion concerning pass-thraugh agreement tax rates resulted in 2020 revenue forecasts that are 17 times higher than RDA projections. Developer fees at buildout are 30� higher then aur estimates. The study did not include cast savings resulting from not having to provide educational services to the area. City and RDA staff have had discussions with PSUSD staff and their consultant concerning these extreme differences between our revenue projections and will be meeting with them to come to some general agreement. PDUSD staff has indicated that they would consider the boundary change if adverse financial impacts can be mitigated. It will be difficult ta begin discussions on the nature of the settlement until we can generally agree upan how much money is on the table. Ultimately Desert Sands will have to be involved in these discussions since they will also need to receive sufficient revenues fram the area to provide educational services. c--`--.� -� ` � PHILIP DRELL DIRECTOR aF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /tm ATTACHMENT 7 __._. ■ Y � 333 SOUTH FARRELL DRIVE PALM SPFiINGS, CALIFORNIA 92262 • 7994 (619)416-8000 FAX (619) 416-8015 WILLiAM E. DIEDRICH, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools BOARD OF EDUCATION: MICHAEL McCABE, President— JANINE PAQUETTE, Clerk DONALD T. AIKENS, Member— LESLIE DeMERSSEMAN, Member— EUNICE JONES, Member July 25, 1996 Mr. Ray Diaz, City Manager City of Palm Desert 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92201 RECEIV�D RECEIVED JUL 2 9 1996�UG - 7 1996 COMM I LOPMENT DEPARTAIENT C�.� MpNp��PALMDESERT Re: Territory Transfer-Financial & Demographic Overview Dear Mr. Diaz: Enclosed is a copy of the report and exhibits regarding the city's requests to transfer territory from Palm Springs Unified School District to Desert Sands Unified School District. The report indicates a significant negative financial impact on our district as well as the ethnic profile of our student population. Please call me if you have questions. �P� Sincerely, �Y GryEN T� l.�•��.`ti'Y1� �L�l� , � � 1,` � � ; �E� : David . MacEwan �_� �..���� � ���X � �� �"'� Direct r �i�T " � �� � ���� Facilities Planning & De� m�- �� DBM:dd Enclosure . � ��`'_Q . �,o � �✓ � �r U r � _ V� — �" / �h��- �'�--�.�.� � � PALM SPRINGS UNtFIED SCHOOL DtSTRICT PUBL:C E� ONOMICS, INC. �r' � iune 1 �)�>/� PAL,1�f SPRINGS UNlf1FD SCHOOL DISTRICT � PALM DESERT TERRITORY TRANSFER STUDY ARE� �VERVIELV OF FINANCIAL .�iND L�E�1�fOGRt1PHlC P,iR,�titETERS A portion of the District is located in the City of Palm Desert--see Exhibit 1. If the District �vere to transfer its Palm Desert territory (the "Study Area") to Desert Sands Uniried Schoof District i"DSUSD"), there would be an impact on the financial and demographic campasition of the District. The following information is provided to help the District determine an equitable division or financial assets ii a territory transfer is pursueG. Study Area The Study Area is shown in Exhibit 1. Currently the 2,458 acre Study Area is predominantly undeveloped. At buildout the Study Area is anticipated to include 3,350 homes, almost 10 millior� square feet of retail, office, and industriai development, an RV park, and 200 acres of State University property (see Exhibit 2). Estimated buildout property val�es are shown in Exhibits b-8. Studeni Generafion There are no students currently living in the Study Area. The District is experiencing a rate of student generation of 0.44 K-12 students per dwelling unit. Based on this student generation rate, the Study Area would generate 1,489 students at buildout. Buildout students are shown by projected grade leve( and ethnic background in Exhibit 4. Ceneral Obligation Bonds The District has outstanding general obligation bonded indebtedness (approximately $35 million) and authorization to issue additional bonds (up to a total of $70 irillion), paid rrom a District-wide ad valorem tax levy. The ad valorem tax rate will fluctuate for two major reasons: (i) is�uance or additional bonds and (ii) increases or decreases in assessed valuation ("AV"l. . Transfer of the Study Area to DSUSD would:result in an increase in the ad valorem tax rate in the remainder of the District Edue to the loss ot AV). The estimated increase in tax burden if the Study Area is removed ranges from as little as $U..�1 per home per year to as rnuch as �8.30 per F�ome per year depending on the year and the amount ot outstanding G.O. bonds. (See Exhib�t 5 for det�iled Prepareci bv: Public Economics, Inc. http://www.pub-econ.cnm DwighC E. Ber;, P.E. l%1 �1 647-6?=1? ext. �� 1 �� /�i`)h E'uhlr;- Er-��nrlitxc:;. Inc-. uruan tcoeortucs Devrlopment Srrvices r�i�in �f�rrr�,,> �nirrei> >< r�u��i �_�r�rrr�.� P��Im 17F�sert T'errtt��ry �r,tn5rer��n��IvSis f'�151P I r)r ' �.+. +.r+� - -r�i ,��- T� r7�--� inrc�rmati��n.� Huwtv�r, at the Sarile time, the cax hurcJer� may he reduced due tu new cieve(��pinent m thN remainder of the District. Camparin�; tax burdens between 1���5-9b and 2015-16 (with $7U million outst�nding bonds) shows that the estimated tax burden is expected to decrease by �,55.68 per home per year--if the Study Area is still within the District--due to increases in the District's AV. ir the Study Area is removed from the District, residents may experience a more modest decrease of �47.38 per home per year (an increase of $B.SU per home per year above savings which wauld accrue if the Study Area re�na;ned in the District). Developer fees The District currently levies developer fees of $1.84 per residentiaf square foot and $0.30 per commercial/industrial square foot. If buildout af tiie Study Area occurs as anticipated, developer fees would yield approximately g19.4 million by buifdout of the Study Area (see Exhibit 3). � Redevelopment Income (Palm Desert Project No. 2) The District entered into an agreement with the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency to receive payments from the Palm Desert Redevelopment Projeci Area No. 2. The value of the agreemeni based on buildout of the Project Area as shown in Exhi6it 8 is at least $27.28 million. The value could be 54 perceni greater if certain factors pertaining to the District's share of tax revenues are interpreted in the District's favor. See Exhibit 9 ror annual cash flow projections and Exhibits 6-8 for information about assumed growth rates in assessed valuation. SUMMARY The major (osses of revenues from transferring the Palm Desert territory would be: ► Loss of estimated $19.4 million in developer�iee revenues ► Loss of estimated 527.28 million in redevelopment revenues � i. K: `. P.-1L.� �S P R G\ R E Pp R T:? ). i.ti� � Prepared hy: Public Economics, Inc. hrrp://www.puh-econ.com DwrghC E. Berg, P. E. 17141 6�17-62=12 ext. 2=� 1 �� 1 yyh ('ublic Ecc�n��rnir•�. 1n�•. � � �Public Economics, Inc. 05(16/96 EXHIBIT 2 Palm Springs Unified School District Palm Desert Territory Transfer Study Area � Development Potential Commercial: Office/Industrial Commercial: Retail Country Club/Single Family Homes Single Family Homes2 State University Emerald Desert R.V. Park Major Raadways TOTAL Zoning Classification SI PG2, PC-3 P R-5 PR-5 PR-S R-1-M Acrea�e� 510 370 840 415 200 60 63 2,458 Anticipated Buiidout Deve{o�ment3 5.78 million SF 4.19 million SF 1,800 dwelling units 1,556 dwelling units exempt develapment RV park roadway 1. A map of the Study Area boundaries is included as Exhibit 1. 2. 415 acres based on PEI's review of land use map provided by City of Palm Desert. 3. Commercial building square footage based on coverage ratio of 0.26. Residential dwelling units based on gross density of 2.15 DUs/acre for country club and 3.75 DUs/acre for other homes. Commercial and residentia) densities per discussion with City of Palm Desert. Prepared by Pub/ic Economics, Inc. Owight 8erg (714} 647-6242 ext. 241 (dberg�pub-econ.com) k:\palmsprg\ca{c02.wk4:development �r "�' •Public Economics, Inc. 05/16/96 EXHIBIT 3 Palm Springs Unified School District Palm De.�ert Territory Transfer Study Area � Potential Fee Revenues with Buildout/Based on 1996-9T Fee Amounts Anticipated Buildout Dwel{ing Building Fee Resulting Units Square Feet Amount Fee Revenu� Commercial: Office/Industrial Commercial: Retail2 Country Club/Single Family3 Single Fami{y Homes3 State University Emerald Desert R.V. Park GRAND TOTAL NA 5,776,456 $0.30 NA 4,040,472 0.30 1,800 3,856,320 1.84 1,556 5,081,896 1.84 NA 0 NA NA 0 --- $1,732,817 1,212,142 7,095,629 9,350,689 0 0 $19,391,276 1. A map of the Study Area boundaries is included as Exhibit 1. 2. This includes a deduction of 150,000 square feet, estimated completed development at Price Ciub/Home Base shopping facilities west of Monterey Avenue. 3. Building square footage for residential development based on an estimated 2,142 square feet per country club home and an estimated 3,266 square feet per other homes. (6ased on a sample of homes from other developments in the City of Palm Desert.) Prepared by Public Economics, Inc. Dwight Berg (714) 647-6242 ext. 241 (dberg�3pub-econ.com) k:\palmsprg\calc02.wk4:fee i.✓ °wr+'" Public�Economics, Inc. 05/16/96 EXH1BlT 4 Palm Springs Unified School Dis�rict Palm Des�ert Territory Transfer Study Area � Projected Student Generation with Buildout of Stud y Area Anticipafed Dwelling Units: 3,356 Student , Yield Ratio Projected Grade levels ent House) Students K-5 6-$ 9-12 TOTAL 0.2668 0.0962 0.0808 0.4438 895 323 271 1,489 229 72 52 353 14 4 4 23 1. A map of the Study Area boundaries is inciuded as Exhibit 1. 2. Based on October 1995 CBEDS data for schools in the City of Palm Desert. Prepared by Public Economics, Inc. Dwight Berg (714) 647-b242 ext. 241 (dbergepub-econ.com) Proiected Ethnic Profilez Hisqanic Black White 614 232 204 1,Q50 her 37 16 11 63 k:\palmsprg\calc02.wk4:students Public Economics, Inc. �' � EXH1BlT 5 Paim Springs Unified School District Palm Desert Territory Transfer Study Area' Assessed Valuation and Impact on GO eonds ACTUAL fiscal Year 1995-96 A[� � 1995-96 Secured 1995-96 GO Bond Tax Rate� Sec�red AV Current Debt F�t�re Debt OS/21 /96 Maximum Outstanding GO Debt (Q2.5 percent of AV) District-Wide, Including Study Area $9,099,368,426 0.03414°/a 0.06828% $227,484,211 Study Area Only 89,312,484 District less Study Area $9,010,055,942 0.03448°/a 0.06896% $225,251,399 Tax revenue which would be generated from Study Area: $30,491 $60,983 Example of tax paid by $150,000 singie family home: If tax paid District-Wide, incfuding Study Area If tax paid in District without Study Area Difference in tax burden $51.21 51.72 $0.51 $102.42 103.44 S 1.02 Potential Fiscal Year 2015-16 (assumes buildout of Study Area over 20 years, see Exhibit 8) Estimated 2015-16 Secured Maximum Estimated 2015-16 GO Bond Tax Rate� Outstanding GO Debt � Sec�red AV; Current Debt F�t �r D bt ��2.5 �Prrent of AV) District-Wide, Including Study Area Study Area Only District less Study Area $19,937,836,745 $3,006,587,731 316,931,249,014 Tax revenue which would be generated from Study Area: Example of tax paid by $150,000 single family home: If tax paid District-Wide, including Study Area If tax paid in District without Study Area Difference in tax burden $468,458 $23.3 7 27.SZ $4.15 �936,916 $46.74 55.04 $8.30 1. A map of the Study Area boundaries is included as Exhibit 1. 2. Tax rate for "Current Debt" based on $35 million in GO bonds currently ouutanding in fiscal year 1995-96. Tax rate for "Future Debt" assumes $70 million in GO bonds outstanding in fiscal year 2015-16. 3. Estimated AV Qistrict-wide based on 1995-96 values inflated at 4.0 percent per year. Estimated AV in Study Area is described in Exhibit 8. Prepared by Public Fconomics, lnc. Dwight Berg (714) 647-6242 ext. 241 (dberg�3pub-econ.com) 0.01558% 0.03116% �498,445,919 0.01835% 0.03670% $423,281,225 k:\patmsprg\calc02.wk4:av Public Economics, Inc. � � 05/16/96 EXH►BI T 6 Actual Secured Assessed Valuations of Selected Non-Residential Development Areas Adjacent to Palm Desert Terrirory Transfer Srudy Area PC-3 (Regional Commercial) Dinah Shore Dinah Shore Dinah Shore Dinah Shore Dinah Shore Dinah Shore Total AVERAGE (per lot SF) PC-2 (Neighborhood/Strip Retail) Country Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Cauntry Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Country Club Dr. Total AVERAGE (per lot SF) Land AV $313,397 149,649 117,453 48,832 2,868,827 242,000 3, 740,158 $2S6 Im V $769,582 1,171,281 4,971,36b 2,066,608 4,587,863 338,000 13,904, 700 $9.51 T AV $1,08Z,979 1,320,930 5,088, 819 2,115,440 7,456,690 580,000 17,644,858 $12.07 $525,771 Lot Area 58,370 100,188 451,717 151,588 681,278 18,730 1,461,871 per acre Land AV $604,653 288,311 1,197,215 249,283 135,479 256,737 207,573 229,591 3,168, 842 $8.02 ImaTAV $592,798 634,603 2,760,078 504, 759 321,794 517,984 545,507 314,973 6,192,496 $15.67 � AVERAGE VALUE FOR MIXED PC-2/PC-3 SI (Service Industrial/�ce) � Enfield Lane Enfield Lane Enfield Lane Enfield tane Enfield Lane Enfield Lane Entrepreneur Lane Entrepreneur Lane Entrepreneur Lane Springfield Lane Springfield Lane S,pringfield Lane Total AVERAGE (per (ot SF) I AVERAGE VALUE FOR SI Land AV $137,332 171,602 79,070 79,070 79,070 257,023 313,740 153,809 123,298 360,600 207,012 186,817 2,148,443 $7.39 Im�V $262,668 328,467 140,930 170,930 170,930 481,664 577,227 359,730 328,593 5 89,400 422,017 589,941 4,422,547 $15.22 �tal AV $1,197,451 922,914 3,957,293 754,042 457,273 774,721 753,080 544,564 9,361,338 $23.69 $1,032,127 Lot Area 34,848 37,026 198,198 29,620 18,730 30,492 24,829 21,344 395,087 per acre $778,949 per acre T V $400,000 500,069 220,000 250,000 250,OOQ 738,687 890,967 513,539 451,891 950,000 629,029 776,808 6,570,990 $22.62 Lot Area 13,939 10,454 6,969 8,276 8,276 42,253 46,173 21,780 20,037 60,112 27,OQ7 25,264 290,540 $985,174 peracre PCD Zoning PCD zoning designtation was originally designed as "write-your-own" mixed use zoning proposal, and is expected to be all commercia{. The Palm Desest Community Development Department believes PCD will be a6out 50 percent retail (like PC-2) and 50 percent o�ce/industrial (like SI). SI Service Indusuial, originally envisioned as small-scale industrial (contractors, sheet metap, but has evolved to office parks and retail oriented at major streets with combination of office/light industrial off of the major streets. 2. Assessed valuations do not include personal property or unsecured property. Prepared br Public Economics, lnc. Dwight Be►g (714) 647-6242 ext. 241 (dberg�pub-econ.com) k:\palmsprg\calc01.wk4:av_comm ( � � Public Economics, Inc. 05/16/96 EXHIBIT 7 Actua! Assessed Valuations of Selected Residential Development Areas Adjacent to Palm Desert Territory Transfer Study Area r Single family Homes/Non-Country Club (PR-S) AV Imp. AV Brentwood $80,506 $250,000 Covington 75,893 258,035 Taylor 82,117 252,975 Taylor 92,892 252,975 Taylor 98,053 252,975 AVERAGE $85,892 $253,392 �`4 � --A Single Family Homes/Country G'lub (PR-5) Wild Horse $6Q;075 Wild Horse 40,095 Wild Morse 60,210 Wild Horse 98,280 . Wild Horse � 74,973 Wild Horse 74,973 Wild Horse 74,722 Wilc! Morse 95,962 Wild Horse � 100,000 Wild Hbrse , 7,i,685 , Wagon Wheel 90,694 _ Wagori Wh�el - ,71,685 Wagon 1Nheel . 93,113 .Wagon Wheel 71,685 Wagon Wheel - 46, 71 Q y � Wagon Wheel . 60,21.0 Wag4n Wheel _ 50,595 Wagon V#/heel , 4b,710 - Wagon V17heel , 71,685 Wagon Whe�) 60,210 . AVERAGE $70,714 $162,425 108,405 162, 790 265, 720 181,6�94 186,957 136,615 219,516 325,000 193,815 207,090 � 193,815 207,086 193,815 126,290 162, 790 161,904 126,290 193,81 S 162, 790 Total AV $330,506 333,928 335,092 345,867 351,028 $339,284 $222,500 148, 500 223,000 364,000 256,667 261,930 211,337 315,47$ 425,000 265,500 297, 784 265,500 � 300,199 263,500 173,000 223,000 212;499 173,000 , 265,500 223,000 $183,931 , $254,645 . Prepared by Public Economics, Inc. Dwight Serg (714) 647-6242 ext� 241 (dberg@pub-econ.com) Bldg SF 3,249 2,896 3,388 3,338 3,459 3,266 1,746 1,368 1,746 2,800 2,184 2,184 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,184 2, 703 2,184 2, 703 2,184 1,520 1,746 1, 746 1,520 2,184 1, 746 2,9 42 Lot Ar� 10,018 11,325 10,454 10,890 12,632 11,064 2, 614 2,614 2,614 4,356 3,485 3,485 4,356 4,356 4,356 3,485 4,35b 3,485 4,356 3,485 3,049 2,614 2,614 3,049 3,485 2,614 3,441 Assm. Ye� 1995 1995 1995 1995 1995 1986 1992 1992 1991 1984 198'4 1995 1984 1994 1993 1984 1993 1984 1988 1989 1995 1993 1984 1984 y 1991 k:\pa Imsprg\calc02.wk4:av_res . `'�i✓ .Public Economics, Inc. � EXHIBIT 8 � Palm Springs Unified School District Pa 1 m Desert Pro ject No. Z Assessed Valuafion Growfh Potenfial Within District Zoning Use Acreage� Est. Total UnitsjAcres Est. 1995-96 Unit AVs Fiscal Year 1995-96 z 1 1996-97 3 2 1997-98 3 1998-99 4 1999-00 5 2000-01 6 2001-02 7 2002-03 8 2003-04 9 2004-OS 10 2005-06 11 2006-07 12 2007-08 13 2008-09 14 2009-10 15 2010-11 16 2011-12 17 2012-13 18 2013-14 19 2014-15 20 2015-16 Percent Built Annuailv_ 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% S.0% 5.0°l0 5.0% 5.0% S.0% 5.0% 5.0% S.0% 5.0% 5.0% PR-5 � PR-5 SI PC-2/PC-3 Country Club SFD O�ce/Ind. Retail 840 355 248 93 1,800 1,331 248 93 $254,645 $339,284 $985,174 $778,949 *********AV OF ANNUAL NEW DEVElt7PMENT********* � $24,063,924 25,267,120 26,530,476 27,857,000 29,249,850 30,712,343 32,247,960 33,860,358 35,553,376 37,331,045 39,197,597 41,157,477 43,215,350 45,376,118 47,644,924 50,027,170 52,528,529 55,154,955 57,912,703 �60,808,338 �23,708,332 24,893,748 26,138,436 27,445,357 28,817,625 30,258,507 31,771,432 33,360,004 35,028,004 3 6, 779,404 38,618,374 40,549,293 42,576,757 44, 705,595 46,940,875 49,287,919 51,752,315 54,339,931 57,056,92i �59,909,773 �12,$26,960 13,468,308 14,141,723 14,848,809 15,591,250 16,370,812 17,189,353 18,048,820 18,951,261 i 9,898,824 20,893,766 21,938,454 23,035,377 24,187,146 25,396,503 26,666,328 27,999,644 29,399,627 30,869,608 $32,413,088 �3,803,219 3,993,380 4,193,049 4,402,701 4,622,837 4,853, 9 78 5,096,677 5,351,511 5,619,087 5,900,041 6,195,043 6,504,795 6,830,035 7,171,537 7,530,114 7,906,619 8,301,950 8,717,048 9,152,9�0 $9,610,545 OS/16/96 Cumulative Total AV* a46,791,285 110,632,224 180,246,923 256,027,337 338,389,152 427,773,133 524,646,551 629,504,688 742,872,422 865,305,900 997,394,303 1,139,761,708 1,293,069,048 1,458,016,182 1,635,344,078 1,825,837,110 2,030,325,484 2,249,687,794 2,4$4,853,719 2,736,806,8 9 �,�3��(?6,587,731 1. Excludes non-taxable acreage such as roadways and planned State Universiry property. 2. The "iota! AV" for 1995-9b is actual 1995-96 assessed valuation based on Auditor-Controller`s Records. 3. Assessed valuations of new constn�ction in 1996-97 and later years are estimated 1995-96 AVs inflated at 5.0 percent per year. Assessed valuations do not include personal property or unsecured property. * Assessed valuations of properry after construction are inflated at 4.0 percent per year. k:\pal msprg\calc02.wk4:av_red t • ` Public Economics, Inc A-C fund No.: 02-1584 TI All Areas TI fisca) DisVibuted Year � t��n�v BY 1986-87 526,312,515 8 1995-96 5,017,061 9 1996-97 6,545,261 10 1997-98 7,763,146 11 1998-99 9,084,427 12 1999-00 10,516,b01 13 2000-01 12,067,680 14 2001-02 13,746,233 15 2002-03 15,561,419 16 2003-04 17,523,029 17 2004-05 19,641,532 18 2005-06 21,928,117 14 2006-07 24,394,748 20 2007-05 27,054,214 21 2008-09 29,920,191 22 2009-10 33,007,295 23 2010-t 1 36,331,157 24 2011-12 39,908,486 25 2012-13 43,757,151 26 2013-{ 4 47,896,255 27 2014-15 52,346,227 28 2015-16 57,128,912 29 2016-17 60,583,212 30 2017-18 64,265,752 31 2018-19 68,192,865 32 2019-20 �49,506,51 {' 33 2020-21 '� 0 34 2021-22 0 35 2022-23 0 36 2023-24 0 37 2024-Z5 0 38 2025-26 0 39 2026-27 0 40 2027-28 0 •r rt O .. .. � .. ,. Q •r •r 0 .. .. � .. .. fl .. .. p .. ., 0 .. .. p .. .. p .. ,. p .. .. p � ,�.rr' Exhibit 9 Palm Springs Un�ed Scbool D;strict Palm Desert Project #1, Porfion with Palm Springs USD Income Pro%ectionl20 Year Buitdout Growth Scenario TI from QSUSD Area 406,699 1,045,1 d9 1,741,256 2,499,060 3,322,b78 4,216,518 5,185,252 6,233,833 7,367,511 8,591,845 9,912,729 11,336,403 12,869,477 14,518,948 16,292,227 18.197,158 2Q242,041 21,435,664 24,787,32A 27,306,855 30,004,664 31,207,299 32,458,039 33,758,809 35,111,610 ' Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oistrict 1009'o Share 30.527% 124,561 320,088 533,298 765,392 1,017,644 1,291,4a2 1,588,098 1,909,250 2,256,464 2,631,443 3,035,993 3,472,025 3,941,563 4,446,750 4,989,856 5,573,283 6,199,574 6,871,420 7,591,668 8,363,330 9;189,594 9,557,928 9,940,995 10,339,384 10,753,710 . Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-through All Areas Payments � County, etc. Net 50% of Share �.022% Tax Incremen� above 5�3.0 M 51,556,413 2,030,498 2,408,315 2,818,208 3,262,503 3,743,685 4,264,413 4,827,527 5,436,066 6,093,276 6,802,630 7,5b7,838 8,392,869 9,281,964 10,239,658 11,270,800 12,380,574 13,574,522 14,858,572 16,239,060 17,722,764 18,794,372 19,936,784 21,155,069 15,358,113 � 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAI., Future S 5800,000,000 5381,049,009 5716,704,712 TOTAL, 1995-96 5418,544,479 5198,136,255 f60.683,623 (4.0� discaunt rete) S 2,768,518 3,611,811 4,283,865 5,012.975 5,803,278 6,659,196 7,585,457 8,587,114 9,669,571 10,838,604 12,100,389 13,4b1,527 14,929,076 16,510,582 18,214,110 20,048,285 22,022,330 24,146,103 26,430,147 28,885,733 31,524,918 33,431,073 35,463,174 37,630,237 27.318,721 � 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,960 44,098 84�800 135,630 195,791 264,878 342,745 429,425 525,082 629,984 144�478 868,981 1,003,974 1,149,991 1,307,623 1,477,510 1,660,343 1,856,866 2,067,875 2,294,218 2,400,483 2,510,795 2,625,314 2,641,233 .Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 527,277,078 513,799,779 OS/02I96 PRO/ECT PARAMETfRS Base Year: Base Year AV: 1995-96 AV: Firsi Year of TI: Est. Last Year of TI: iunfeu l�rmt �s reachedl 1986-87 56,121,359 (PSUSD AREN Y46,791,285 �vsus� �a�� 1988-89 2027-28 � Tllimir. 5800.000.000 � tui �aewsi � DistrictShare: 30.62i% � �rsuso nee,v I Debt Override: NA I IAnnua/ASsessed ValueCrowth RaL Assumed Annuai AV Growth Rate: Multiple Actual Prior Year -13.545% p 991-95 b 1995-961 IPSUSD AREN Actual to Present: 25356% (aven;e �ppy� ntel (PSUSD AREN To reach TI Limit: NA ACREEMfNT TERMS (Agreement No. 1) 50.00 percent pass-through of DistricNs share of Net TI in excess of 53.0 mil{ion in any year. Net 71 equals gross TI less specified pass-throughs and LMI set-aside. "Disirict 5hare° is NOT adjusted to inciude a portion of ERAF revenues. 1. First row is revenues prior to current year (these are excluded from Distria totals). k;�palmsprg�9s95prji.wk�:oz-2sa4a Public Economics, Inc. '�'' '`'vj 10/22/96 EXHIBIT 8(Revised per 10/16/96 Meeting) Palm Springs Unified School District Palm Desert Project No. 2 Assessed Valuation Growth Potential Within PSUSD Portion Zoning Use Acreage� Est. Total Units/Acres Est. 1995-96 Unit AVs F�sca! Yea�' 1995-96 2 1 1996-97 3 2 1997-98 3 1998-99 4 1999-00 5 2000-01 6 2001-02 7 2002-03 8 2003-04 9 2004-05 10 2005-06 1 1 2006-07 12 2007-OS 13 2008-09 14 2009-10 1.5 2C110-11 16 2011-12 17 2012-13 18 2013-14 19 2014-15 20 2015-16 21 2016-17 Percent Built l�.nnually 0.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.n% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% PR-5 PR-5 SI PC-2/PC-3 Country Club SFD Office/Ind. Retail 840 355 248 93 1,800 1,331 248 y3 $254,645 $150,000 $985,174 $778,949 *�'*�`*****AV OF ANNJ,�� ".lEW DEVELGP,ti1CNT********* $0 24,313,731 25,043,143 25,794,437 26,568,270 27,365,318 28,186,278 29,031,866 29,902,822 30,799,906 31,723,904 32,675,621 33,655,889 34,665,566 35, 7(15, 53 3 36,776,699 3 7, 8 S0, 000 39,016,400 40,186,892 41,392,499 42,634,274 $0 10,590,434 10,908,147 11,235,392 1 1,572,453 11,919,627 12,277,216 12,645,532 13,024,898 13,415,645 13,818,115 14,232,658 14,659,638 15,099,427 1.5,552,410 16,018,982 16,499,551 16,494,538 17,504, 3 74 18,029,505 18,570,391 $0 12,960, l 16 13, 348,919 13,749,387 14,161,868 14,586,724 15,024,326 15,475,056 15,939,308 16,417,487 16,910,01 1 17,417, 312 17,939,831 18,478,026 19,0.32; 3F,7 19,603,338 20,191,438 20,797,181 21,421,097 22,063,729 22,725,641 $0 3,842,700 3,957,981 4,076,721 4,199,022 4,324,993 4,454,743 4,588,385 4,726,036 4,867,818 5,013,852 5,164,268 5,319,196 5,478,772 S,h43,135 5,812,429 5,986,802 6,166,406 6,351,398 6,541,940 6,738,198 Cumulative i utal AV�' $46,791,285 47,807,749 98,084,529 150,918,054 206,405,996 264,649,374 325,752,668 389,823,928 456,974,890 527,321,097 600,982,019 678,081,186 758,746,313 843,109,437 931, 307,061 1,0?.3,4�i0.291 1,1 19,774,989 1,220,341,925 7,325,336,932 1,434,921,076 1,549,260,816 1,668,528,180 1. Excludes non-taxable acreage such as roadways and planned State University property. 2. "Total AV" figures for 1995-96 and 1996-97 are actual AVs based on Auditor-Controller's Records. 3. Assessed valuations of new construction in 1996-97 and later years are estimated 1995-96 AVs inflated at 3.0 percent per year. Assessed valuations do not include personal property or unsecured property. * Assessed valuations of property after construction are inflated at 2.0 percent per year. k:\pal m sprg\ca I c03.wk4:av_red ri ATTACHMENT 8a Ml�U1'E.S � REGULAR PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL MEETIlVG �ANUARY S, 1998 **s********s**s*ssssssssss�sssx*sss�s:s*ss**#*ss�***sss Mr. Di.az responded that while staff may not ask the Water Distriet what the City's rights are, staff wiil obtain that information. � Mayar Bensan called for the vote. The motion carried by a 3-2 vote, with Mayor Benson and Councilman Kelly voting NO. D. RF1lTTRS'i_' FpR cONSIDERATION OF ADMINLST�tATIVE CITATION SCHEDULE OF FINES FOR CERTAII�T VIOLATIONS QF THE PALM DESERT MUi�IICIPAL CODE. (Continued fram the meeting of December 11, 199'7) Mr. Erwin noted the memorandum from the City Clerk dated 7anuary $, 1998, with an additional ordinancx, No. 868, relative to establishment of an apgeals heazing board. He noted Ehat the Council I�ad three oniinances and one resolution for consideration at this kime. Councilman Crites moved to: 1) Waive further reading and pass Ordinance No. 864 to second reading, adding Chapter 8.$0 to th� Palm Desert Musucipal Code rcgazding administzative remedies for Munieipai Code violations; 2) waive further reading and pass Ordi�ance No. 865 to second reading, adding Chapter 8.81 to the Patm Desett Municipal Code r�garding adminis�ative citations for Municipal Code _ violations; 3) waive further rqciing and pass Ordiaance No. 868 to second reading, adding Section 8.80.025, establishing an appeals hearing baiard to the Palm Desert Municipal Code regarding administrative remedies for municipal coc3e violations; and 4) waive further rtading and adopt Resolution No. 98-6 setti�tg forth the administzaave citation schedule of fines for certa'sn violatians for tha Palm De,Sert Municipal Code. Motion was seconded by Fesguson and canie� by uaanimaus vote. XII. OLD BUSINF.SS A. $�UF�T F�$„�'ONSID�'R_ATION OP NORTH FRANK SIl�IATRA SCFi00L DTSTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGES. � � Mr. Diaz nobed the report in the packet along with staff's recommendation and a m.solution. Councilman Spiegel stated that as he undersiood the staff report, if this is approved it will then ga bo the school boat+ds for their approval. Mr. Diaz stated that this was correct and that staff would send ti�e iesolution tu th� two school boards with a re�quest that they proceed with the boundazy ehanges. Cauncilman Kelly ask�d what would happen if the two schaol boards do not a�prove, and he said he did not think they wouid da so. Upon question by Mayor Be��son, Mr, Diaz stated that staff did not have any other suggestiaas unless tho Council wishod to go ta the �,. ��, �.., owners and ask th�m to r�uest 27 NdII�(1`rF�S ' REGULAR PALM DESERT CTI'Y COUNCIL MEETIl�IG JANUARY 8, 1998 ! # t �t t �t * * it �t i * # # * # �t � # # • * # * ! * i * �t � * t ! �k t � * * # * �t � �c ; * �R �t # * i �r iR # �► �k the boundary changes, which staff would not recornmend doing. He said another aption wauId be to cr�ate anakher school district, and he said he would recommend that the Council look at that ogtion as apposed to having to get the cooperation of the two districts, Palm Springs Unified and Desert Sands Unified. Councilman Ferguson stated he agreed with Councilman Kelly. Councilman Crites asla�3 why staff was against having the homeowners request the boundary changes. Mr. Diaz stat�d he would not rec�mmend Ehe City gctting involved in elandestine operaaons in having ti�►e pmperry owners request the chat►ge in boundaries. Howeves, he did feel PaUn Desert should look at having its own schoo� disirict. Caun�ilman Crites stated that instead of having clandestine op�atians, what if the Couacil would say right here and now that it aioourages the hQmeowners out there to request the boundary change. He said i�e did not hear anything of substance about why we ought nat be pasitive if they so choose to do that. Mr. Diaz s�ated he had na pmblem with se�nding letters to prc7perty owners encouraging them to apply for the bovndary change; however, if they do not wish to do so, that is fine, too. Councilman Crites stated that he assumed, carrectly or not, that property owners and — �esidents in that area wuuld wish to be in the school system that serves the rest of the City. If the City goes out and asks raidents ta so petitioa and they say they don't want to be in that district and would rather remain in the Palm Springs District, thea that would ariswer his question. �%wevtr, if they choose to ask for that change, he said he saw nothing in the report that says why we sl�ould not be supportive as►d why that's not a legitimate way to a�complish this purpose. Mr. Diaz stat,ed that in the past the City has bccn supportive when they have askcd far those changes. Tn this situatian, the City is telling them to go do somethiag that they bave a right to do. He said any x.�r�.�,y owner ther�ee now has the right to go and petidon for a baundary changc; however, he said staff would send Ietters to ti�em and ask them to do so. CounciFman Spi�gel stascd that l�is understanding was that there aze not a lot af property +owners in that area at this point but that there are a lvt of developers. Caunalman Ferguson st� that he and Mayor Bensan had spent about two months last fall talking ta ic�numerable nsidents who wcre shocked tbat the City had no contmt over the school syso��n. Ae said tt� was na shortage of complaints about how tEiey werc being run. He said whcther the City sends a resolution to the school districts, or whether it encourages pi+npeRy ovfmas, t�at we ought to dual track it and proceod full speod ahead ia formirig otu � 2$ r�II�TU'I`TS REGULAR PALM DESERI" C1TY COUNCIL MEETIl�TG JANUARY 8,1998 s**�*s�***s�+ess*s*ss�sss*ssss�s*�s#*s**s*ssss**�*s*s*ss own distric� It might get someone's attention. Ae saiH the worst thing that could happen is that the City gets cantrol over its schaals. Mr. Diaz stated fmm a staff standpoint he would rocoinmend that we go ahead and establish aur own school disbrict rather than belling people that they have the right to do what they have a right to do. Couna7man Crites statcd that while he understood the paint of viow of Mr. Diaz and while having certain sym,pathy for what Councilman Fergusan stated, he suspected in the long run it wauld be easier to change the boundaries of thc existing dislricts than to form a new district. He suggested that if the City parsues forming its owa dis�rict, it also pursue getting property awne,ccs and re,sidents to at ]east b� aware of their abilities and to be a friendly, local city government in any changes that they might wish to makc to existing boundaries. Councilman Spiegel stated he agreed but also felt the City should also let the school boazds lrnow if its intentions. He said at this point, ti�e discussions had primarily been held witt� the superintenden�s of each of the districts and maybe one baard mem�eer rather than the tatal baards. Mr. Diaz sta�i thai what he was heazing from Council was that it wanted staff to set►d ietters ta property owners who live in the district in quesdon. Cflunciiman Kelly stated that all staff nocds to do is nptify the p�oplc thaE the City wants to have its awn district, that they are now in the Palm Springs School District, inform thcrn of what is going on, and let them Irnow what their options are. . Mr. Diaz stat�d that he wouid diaft a 2etter for Council ta iook at that would indicate we are loaldng at a situadon where one school district would bc operating in tha City, Among tho optians are for those property owners, who aze now in the PaIm Springs Unificd School Dist�ict, to switch ta the Desert Sands Urufied School Uistrict, which has the greatcr parc of the City. The letter wouId aiso indicate that we are loolang at the establishment of a new school district. Councilman Sgiegel statsd thaz Counalmembers in hoth Rancho Mirage and Indian Wclls had indicated an interest in bcaoming pazt of that new schnol district. Councilman Fergusan stated he had a hunch'that if a leiter was sent to all our nsidents indicatinng that the City was considesing fonning Palm Desert Unifiod Schoal District, staff' woceld be rnrerwhelmed hy the response it would get. F� 11rIINUTF.S REGULAR PALM DFSERT CITY COUNCIL MEETIl�IG JANUARY S, 1998 ss*�a*•ssss�*sss*�ssws**ss�**:*�s*#�**��s�**s*s:s**sss*s* Councilman Spiegel stateci that the anly problem we will havt is that titis is where the maney comes fram for the school district. Councilman Ferguson moved to� by Minute Mation, explore formation of Palm Desert Unified Schoai Distzict and repart back tn the Conncil, cottcurrently with a letter to residenis informing them of the current situation and passible solations to it, suliciting their feedback. Motion died for lack of a second. Councilman Spiegel rnoved to, by Minute Moaon, direct the City Manager to send letters to the Palm Springs Unified Schaol District and Desert Sands Unified School District Baazds letting them know af the City's concerns and giving them a week to reply, with direction to staff to place t}us item on the next City Council Agenda for repvrt. Motion was seconded by Crites and carried by unanimous vots. -� � .. � B, �F.,QjiFST FOR_�PPROV�L_ OF 24TH CO1��VfUNT�Y DEVELOPMENT BLOCK C3RANT FUNDING YEAR RECUNIIvIENDATIONS. Mr, Diaz noted the staff report and recommcndation in the pacioets. Management Analyst Ray 3anes reviewed the staff report, noting that a revised n�pvrt had bern distxibuted rdrlier in the day changing the amounts for two ageacies (Foundation for the Retarded -- fram $75,000 ho 550�000; Home Impmvement Pragram -- fmm S45,t100 to `y $7Q,OOQ). He statec3 that these changes wera the result of the Charitable Contributians Committx meeting of Ianuary 6, 1998. Mayor Benson noted that the change was because the Faundation was going to use tho 575,000 tioward the ��se of another embroidery machine, not the cast of it. She said the CommitLoe dxided to give them $50,000 towazd the cost of the machinery and add anothcr 525,000 W the �ioine Improvement Progtam. Mr. Diaz statcd ti�at az that meetisig the Chazitable Contributions Committee instructed s�i'f to look into establishing an eadowment fund for the Hame Impravement Pmgram. The fund for that wauld be from the savings that we would be securing as a result of taking over the Riverside Ca�mty Housing Anthority's bonds. H� said staff would come back f,o the Council regar�ing this matter. G�uncilmat� Spiegel mwed to, by bfinute Mation, appro�►e the recommmdations fiam the Chatitable Contribution Committce far the 24th Cammunity Development Block Grant (CDBG) fvnding yeaz. Co�u�ciIman Kelly sta�od thax whil� he fr1t the Faundation docs an outstanding job, the clients came from all aver the Va11ey. He said ir+ his experi�nce with Suntine transporting tt�em, the major portion af cliazts come from Palm Springs. He said he wouid nat nvrmally bc in — favor of cttanging tiie amouats of the funding but wauld agr�e to this because of the 3U ATTACHMENT 8b � C�� �� P�O� ����� �� -v�z 73-510 FRED WARING DRiVE, PA�(IA DESERT, CALIFQRNiA 922fi0-2578 January 15, 1998 TELEPHONE (619) 34fi-061 i Ms. Dorzs Wilson, Supenntendent DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 82-879 Highway t 11 Indio, California 92201 Dear Ms. Wilson: FAX (619) 340-0574 � � �� The Palm Desert City CounciI has asked me to mform you of their continuing desire to have one school district serve our crtizens. As you aze aware, a major porhan of Palm Desert is served by Desert Sands Umfied School District, while tiie azea north of Frank Sinatra is served by Palm Spnngs Urufied School Dismct The benefits of having a city served by a smgle school distnct in terms of uniform regulation, governmental relations, citizen confidence, and neighborhood unity, are clear Currently these benefits aze not enjoyed by our residents. Our Council is aware that altering school district boundanes is not a s�mple matter, however, �f if both districts serving Palm Desert filed for boundary alterations to enable us to secure our goal, the process would be greatiy simplified. Logically, it would make sense to us that all of Palm Desert be located within the Desert Sands Urufied School Distnct inasmuch as it already serves ow overwhelmmg ma�ority of the City In the event we are unable to secure umform �unsdictton of our local schools, I have been directed by Council to explore the creation of a Palm Desert Uniiied 5chool Distr�ct �n order to achieve this result. Contanued.. � � Pr�l�,r�c � ��i�/� �— �� c�s=r G�v��a �o '���'� , ��� nnY�t� �������a;r�.�� , '�• � Ms. Doris Wilson January 15,199$ Please let me know your distnct's posirion on the issue as qtuckly as possible. This vv�ll enable me to inform our City CounctI on how best to proceed I have placed th�s matter on the Council's February I2, 1998, agenda for further consideratian. Thank you for your constderation on this matter Sincere}y,- _ . , ,- � !• � G � / .,:y, O . rAZ � � CITY MANAGER � cc• Mayor and City Council Board Members � � ClTY OF PALM DESERI' y�� January 15, 1998 i , < ��� �� ���� ����� 73�510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260-2578 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 FAX (619� 340-0574 Mr. William Diednch, Supenntendent PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DTSTRICT 333 South Farrell Dnve Palm Springs, Califorma 92262 Dear Mr. Diedrich• � The Palm Desert City Counctl has asked me to infarm you of the�r contmuing desire to have one school distnct serve our citizens. As yov are awaze, a ma3or portion of Paim Desert is served by Desert Sands Urufied School Distnct, wlule the area north of Frank Sinatra is served by Palm Spnngs Unified School D�strict. The benefits of havmg a city served by a single school d�stnct in terms of umform regulanon, govecnmental relations, citizen confidence, and neighborhood unity, are clear Currently these benefits are not enjoyed by our residents. Our Council is aware that altering school district boundanes is not a simple matter; however, if if both distncts serving Palm Desert filed for boundary alterattons to enable us to secure our goal, the process would be greatly simplified. Logically, it would make sense to us that a1i of Palm Desert be located vv�thin the Desert Sands Unified School Dtstrict inasmuch as �t already serves our overwhelming ma�onty of the City. In the event we are unable to secure unifarm }tu7sdzction of our iocai schools, I have been directed by Council to explore the creation of a Palm Desert Unif ed School District in order to achieve this result Contmued -. `*: ATTACHMENT 9 � � � t �ITEROFFICE MEMORANDUM �UEPA.RTMENT OFTHE CITYMANAGER C1TY DFP�tLM DBSEIlT �� �I 1 J Sepiember l3, t999 TO. HON�RABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM; RAM4N A DIAZ, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: DISTRICT AND SCHOOL ATI'EI�TDANCE BOUNDARIES AND FUTURE CITY CONTRIBUTIONS TO SCHOOLS . Staff in the past year, I believe. has successfuIly worked to �mprove retauons with the Desert Sands Unified Schnol Distnct. The elimmation of "artificial" ownership tines to better ptaa L�ncaln anci Palm Deseri IVvddle School, the d�scuss�on to combine oeu North Sphere Park and a future elementary school, as well as the ongomg discusstons and gublic improvements at the lugh school are araong the results of the imp=oved cammunicat�ons. There is one issue, howevcr, that we have placed behind us wiuch may requue new discuss�ons. The �ssue �s thai of school district boundanes We may also need to look at sEudent attendance boundaries vsnth�n the Desert Sands Distnct itself. Cara rnust be takea to assure ihat al� school students living in Palm Desert can take advantage of any improvements made tQ schools w�tlun our city that are fundod by the ctty Our concem centcrs on the yuesuon of what should ar can be done if the Crty or RDA expends funds for schools �n Patm Desert that same Palm Desert students cannot attend The two reasons tins may accur are because they ather res�de in another d�stnct or they attend a school outst@e our corporate luzuts We may wish to execute a cooperative agre;ement that any student Itv�eg m Palm Desert would be able to attend a school in Palm Desert if he or she so wished .� � � i�Y IAZ np � ATTACHMENT 10 � CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEtOPMENT STAFF REPORT T0: Honorabie Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Philip Drell, Director of Community Development DATE: October 25, 2001 SUBJECT: North Frank Sinatra Schoal District Boundary Change Process I. BACKGROUND: School district boundary changes can be initiated by registered voters within inhabited territory, property owners within uninha6ited territory, or by resolution of the City. The petition then goes to fihe County Superintendent of Schools to be referred to a County comrnittee which holds an initial public hearing which results in either rejection of the petition (which ends the process) or accepting of the petition which results in a tentative recommendation. That recommendation goes to a second public hearing where there is a review of nine specific criteria. A petition cannot be approved unless all nine criteria are met. In uninhabited territory, the petition can be approved without an election if all nine criteria are met and all property owners and school districts agree. In inhabited territory or when there is not universai consent by all parties, an election would be called unless there is an appeal to the State Superintendent. Elections can include all or a portion of both school districts or be confined to the effected territory as determined by the committee. If the petition is denied by the County committee, it dies unless appealed to the State. If the State �everses the County denial then the election process would proceed. If the State reverses a County approval, the petition is dead. Attached is a surnmary and flow chart of the process and the criteria for approval. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE PROCESS OCTOBER 25, 2001 II. ANALYSIS: As applied to the proposed boundary change north of Frank Sinatra, eight of the nine criteria should not create obstacles for approval. Criteria No. 2, "The districts are each organized on the basis of substantial community identity" strongly supports the change. In our discussion with PSUSD, only Criteria No. 9 is at issue. "The proposed reorganization will not negatively affect fiscal management or fiscal status of the proposed district affected by the proposed reorganization." Under our existing General Plan, PSUSD viewed the north Frank Sinatra area as a significant net revenue producer. Given the predominance of resort, commercial and industrial development, demands for educational services would be minimal while developer fees and RDA pass-through revenues would be significant. At build out developer fees were estimated between S 15,000,000 and 520,000,000. Although there was considerable debate between RDA and PSUSD consultants involving the pass-through formula, the District forecasts a loss of 538,000,000 over 40 years. They would consent to the change if they were compensated for the loss in developer fees and a 513,249,665 lump sum payment equal to the present value of the RDA revenue stream. Desert Sands Unified School District has been neutral throughout the debate but would also need a share of the revenue stream to provide educational services. Without mutual agreement on a revenue sharing formula, it will be difficult for the County committee to make a positive finding for Criteria No. 9 resulting in a denial. If the petition is approved by the County committee without a revenue agreement, then an appeal by PSUSD is likely. As part of the City's General Plan Update, land use alternatives are being considered which would significantly increase the amount of permanent resident housing and demand for educational services. While this alternative may alter PSUSD's previous revenue versus cost projections, their initial response to the prospect of having to provide significant educational services was quite �a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE PROCESS OCTOBER 25, 2001 enthusiastic. They looked forward to developing a K-8 and magnet 9-12 high school in the area in association with Cal State. III. CONCWSION: Without a revenue sharing agreement between the two school districts, approval of a reorganization by the County committee is unlikely. Until the General Plan process is completed revenues and educational demand within the area are uncertain. It will be difficult to proceed with the petition without some cooperation and support from Desert Sands. They do not seem to be interested in any discussion of the issue. At this point a viable course of action would be to allow the General Plan Advisory Committee to debate the relative merits of the boundary change with input from both Palm Springs and Desert Sands. Once the General Plan is completed, the City and the school districts will have a better idea concerning the ultimate nature of the area. Prepared by: � PHILIP DRELL, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Review and Concur: RICHARD J. FO�KERS ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Review and Concur: CARLOS L. ORTEGA CITY MANAGER Itm I W pducsltm�sr\boundary.tcl � I� � � n�N � � � � �, , � � �° � �s �� A �v�o �' � � w � S s, m � H � � o�a oa � � e �. c�i �. ' � o ��� ��� � #. � n •O N Q' A `I .� 0 � a n 5' A � o, o O m � o a �• o 6�°..✓ N r �o � %a > � o. no o . f��S' �v '� w�� b w� w� � � vC)a Q �� N � � "' .e. � � „�N„ 090 [f $� c• /G, � v � � � a � O � � \' � I � � �� � �z � � � z /p �' ` � C t`�, i1i � .,�y ` �YJ � � b p i� �p `�b �a ny_► m.� U';a � � .. . t� N � � �w , twi��F' p+! � � � � M• , t�rl N ' � N O � ti o3 ` Q � � � "+ .< � p{7 \ �� ' f�ii , , � wilhin I20days ' � � "0' � w � � z- � r �� �� d�� v � n � �? � � � d o; w � � �. �n�� � $ � � a/ ., A S � w � �' o �� �o � �\ 0 w �• ,,,,, ��• pCGf �� �� U�" " \c�uO�� \ �/ 0 �1 rz-� �3 � � � � Cy O �� � � N y � �O � � � � � ���� ?. A v � � ^• � ya o� � A � c a r H cp f �. 4 ; 4 \ C. '\ j.� � � r 0 � � � y C� z„� �, rnvn �nnv onon ano anc vc�J on • nr rnnv ir� inn fl8/21/2001,16:38 FAY 909 369 6363 RCQE GRSS _.OU5 B. Process: Quick-Reference Chact 5.3 TERRifORY TRANSFERS INITIATED BY � A 10��i'T �,., � � � �flN /�Q S 6 Ct,c- ���� (See Flowchart C.) - � � SO Ct.L �i G?ti 1. Initiation of Proposals for Territory Transfer by r' EC 35721) �.0 � S 7 ZI CG � 2. Preliminary Hearing of Petition (EC 35721 [�f ) a. Following the heazing, the county committee must grant or deny the petition. b. If the petition is granted, the county committee must adopt tentative plans and recommendations. � 3, Public Hearings (EC 35721 [�J). A public hearing in the area proposed for reorganization must be held by the county committee within 60 days of adopting plans and recommendations. 4. CEQA Review (Public Resources Code sections 21000 through 21177). The county committee must determine the impact that the territory transfer will have on the environment and hold public hearings in conjunction with the reorganization hearing. 5. County Committee Study of the Territory Transfer (EC 35722, 35�09, 35710). The county cornmittee study must determi�e tho impact of the temtory transfer on the criteria listed in Education Code Section 35753. 6. Approva] Process (EC 35709, 357 ] 0, 35722) a. All territory transfers are settled at khe locat level. b. Within 120 days of the first of any public hearings required by EC 35721(c), the county committee must approve or disapprove the petition. c. If both of the following two conditions are met, the county committee may approve the territory transfer without an election: i. The tenitory constitutes ]ess than 10 percent of the assessed valuation of the district; and ii. The governing boards of a11 affected school districts consent to the transfer. d. For all other territory transfers, if the county committee approves the transfer, the county superintendent must call an election in the area as deterrnined by che county committee. 40 �; ;� �.. �:: � a �. � � � � d 5j � '^ . C %; ` ; t � i � l : � � ? 5i '' S k �- � e � F � ���'^a���Y �P� '_ � �>, �'�ia . - . 6 f} � � . ' � _� , i � t�. � S � ! � , - . . . � � .r - . i � Pr�� f� ��"�`i� ���t� .�ri" t�e ��� _� ��� , .. . . � � , � .� � ��. _ . . _ €s.::: � _.. �::� .-w ess _. '�°�_ .._ � l_ �.y., �=. . . 5' � ���� �� -�� 2 + �: � � � - ���� �+ i' h,. ��_ �� ::#,..as� . ' ,a � , _. � , ,^�x: , . M .�, �' ;���i�' • . ������� �� ,. t � � , , ' - { �� �L Y A . 9 „ . ... _ , .e��:. : :�56 I ' . .�' � � . rt ' 6 j � P F. � !g � r��f+T, g'��. 5�}� 3 �C Y E rv'Gt� y.ft � , . & �O�Y�<t � q ka � �k � ' � $ `q� ,�.. � � v `u L. �r `. . ; � � - � 3�i�X ; � �'.. ��-e �y+'C.:��y � �. .� tf� �� . . � .! ; T S b.i'�a� ^'i ..3 .• � � '�' .�+ � �'r��¢,i ��Z.-�� _"Y . '�;`bj:�'.su;. GF. �' ,, � ���� �s k . . - ��k�ay c-.rP.-.� ,.j�s ,s r .� ca - f iEe` r ,r F = ni � ' ,� f"�;� . _ �p `� X� � r �`„�'.� �' � ' � .. -��� � � . .. , �r ' �T �� .. ������"�^�5�� ; � � � ;�� S� �`f � ,�' � '�d � � r � -�r � ^1 t � '� � � k�{ ' ` .x �.� � �x�z, :° : Y, . € f �{ � � � Y . S � t�. .y„� y �'x' . l' i� i nI: � '� t� R ����i ��� � �,^�� ." i � �. f �i'- � . -- . {_ ., -.. . ,.., ., .,. . _� � , c y. ._ es ....w _ xsn,-S�¢».�_3.:��Lid.�.v'rk'ag .�:vli � i('. �9.1'.{::R k!. & W� y�.�^� � fJ � ._ :Sa.. �`v �Y . R ! b'S �. �,:, �. �_ 5 +�..:; ;_s' �� w r.�..: Fr rn'�� :.�: z � r e n�. t�� +�a�;,.-_�t;� - -�r,'.. ,a.. i . ��$,f-�. '! b.Y��i .c.#iY.. 3' �" �� iY^.:S,t. s � • �:i�31 `-J"�eY�... L1! sr at�L..:r. . . . s +r tL_=5 �,an ��1� : �a � � _i 5 I' �''I,, 5-' ;A+'. �•R • A : ..:YN;,'h•' T`he �+�t# c,�s��s deal v�r�i ���tt�r C�mi�e►'� pi�►� _t�� ��i�ir- t�titc�ries purs+�ac'rt to �du�t��ort �� ��r,�s� �7�t3.�, ��1 �: �"��. 'i't�� �ut"�ty C+��nitt�e m�y ir�iti�te #he p�cu�� f� p+ut�l+c �►�'m� �r�d th�►i ct�ay �►'snt th� propc��ats if the Committ� �de�tr�i� th�t t�e �pas�1� ineet the c�ria pursuant tb Ed��an Code �e�ti�n �57�, � s�tN b�' el�i�ts E� M�td if tl�e tequirements of �e�i�n 35�10 are sst�sfred. Yhese cade sectior�s �r� summari�ed on the folfowing page. Z �,,. „ ;,,;�,� '��'�; �,,.:,,.�, :':�„�� 'r�;� ��', �„';:,, ��� ,.� �; =�`�'0�►��� tC1 tr8t'16f#� �QC�t`� �?fl't t� �t�i`!C}�� d#��'`tt� �i�'�' tiil�fi C�t�'t#f$ v4'1��"� �se�� of t�re .�� ,���� tQl,�#�rr� r+��iir� i� t�,�� ���� ��r��� ��rr�� �' th� ��� �i����: 1� C���` ��#� ��E � ����� "' T ��i � . xR � �� �� , ,�f����� 3 . �Y l ,�5�+', , � ,��� '� c�E+�1 � �� ac�d $tt�� I�.� ��'�' + � {�. ���� � t � . ' = " `�'t,- �., .�� �-�,'�"�l � . .. �,�', ��� il�� �9���; ���+ .�A���► ��� �' � � �'� � ,�� � �- ����'�1Gy[� - i ,' T T • X,�,y ss �� � � �"� � ��« ���'���� �� � � ��°�. ` � � �� � � « � � � ��r��r � � . � � �i��}��I�� � x � '. � 3'�i� a � � ' '� P > x.R k - � .;� � 14t � �, � . z. � � . �s �+§ �p-, ��r a �S ,�,,,,,. , . F ^' k n 4 ��" A } b � -. F 4� f-' X k� . � M�� `� . ���5���' � F������� d,�# �� �' t �, ro 3 b'�y �.=a 1�t� f - , �^ . .�R �� � � � ��`x,tF �h'� 8�� _ ��y �'"',�� `Y �T,,_a= r �'►C�I,', . �� � �N "'�- , � �'����i� - s � � �„� �� � ' ' * r;' 3� ��,;>! `z � . � � �� Y.; � x �� � �:,. �f ~ t 0 4�',� _ .. q' sK �` f � ��r�.F 7�ai' � - t F'.:: k: t M! .:1 �."� : 1 I � .�12, 1 =`.aj' - t .:7Y'M ••� ���_ �.��r�•K.•....:. � �'`'��A� `� .. 4 h_ x a�..� . �. ,. • 1 �3:. q � -.5 t5' ! :: R• ►j'fi.t' i ���;� i.: �a - �A F �.l.: r i�,'" i;� •. .:.:e N, J �c{ M • ! 4�+ tt �i+ [+.ik5" �'#� i� � ., rs: t r ♦' .�» s�a. a � ' i i " r : • ! ►.�c: t''� r + — �M . r ia .: ; 4 �. a :a' � �, e. • r . �� w:.,' : �r a� � ,;s.: � a a :; «. :. '� ,; a b .. a A'w+;: '��*-'.. � �N� ,:� ! • f1,.: S �w .O � Y 1) : : Y'� 'r U 1 !':`S s Ir,; k 1�' f+. �V:-!,4 7Y' M:. • f� M� ..,It�: • � �"��� presen� ca�e� de�! witk� the �r�rit� �:c�mit�`s �c�s�a{ ta tr�r�s��r ��r�����E�����, ._a���a�� �� �d�,�cat� �.c�d� S��;i�ns �S��A.�, 3�721 �d 3�5722. �'h� ��a�r�� �.���itt� ��v �r�i#i�t� th� pr�c,r�ss f�r �t�bli� h���r'sn�s �nd #t�tr� mra�� r�r�n� s��� ..����1� i� ��� �����itt� det+�r��r►�s t.�rat the pr�pusals meet ihe, ��it�r►� ��.�4�: ,.-r� ��:�a�Ci��� �°��c�� �e�;tia� ����"�, �� ��h�i? �►rr��r' e��e�tiar�� h� h�ld if ��� ���i��r�x��;�� _� ��e°����� :���'� "`� �r� ���isfi��� ,_����� ;�,cac�� ���tians �r� ���mm�r�zed ��r� t�� ���t� :, , ° r Order, notiflcation � The County Committee may approve a pe#ition without an election provided aii criteria are met, and the territory is uninhabited or less than 10°�6 of the assessed valuation of the district losing the temtory. tn addition, the goveming boards of all schoo! districts must �pprove the transfer (Education Code 35709). Notification of approval; eiecNon; conditions � For all other petitions to tra�sfer territory, if the County Committee finds that the conditions for transfer are substantially met, the County Committee may approve the petition and notify the County Superintendent of Schoots who shall cail an election in the teRitory of the districts as determined by the County Committee (Education Code 35710). t 3 0 THE CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR THE ANALYSIS (E.C.35753) CRITERION 1 'The new districts will be adequate in terms af number of pupils enrolled." Guidelines * elementary schooi district 901 " high school district , 301 * unified school district 1,501 The committee should consider the projected enrollment and the resulting increase/decline. It is not necessary to meet the minimum requirements if the Committee feels there are extenuating circumstances, e.g., geographical barriers, etc. CRITERION 2 0 'The transfer would be organized on the basis of a substantial community identity." Guidelines The Committee should consider the following criteria: * isolation * geography " distance between social centers " distance between school centers " topography • * weather * community, school and social ties and other circumstances peculiar to the area 4 i CRITERION 3 } 'The proposal will result in an equitable division of property and facilities of the � original district or districts." ► Guidelines a. All property, funds, and obtigations, except real property and bonded indebtedness. (e,g., funds, cash on hand, monies due but uncollected, state apportionments). The Committee will determine which of the criteria authorized under Education Code Section 35736 shall apply for dividing the property. ' assessed valuation * revenue limit per pupil in each district * average daily attendance (ADA) The Committee should consider the value and location of the school property and jsuch other matters as may be deemed pertinent and equitable. b. Real property The real property and personal property and fixtures normally situated thereat shall be the property of the district in which the real property is � located J c. Bonded Indebtedness � Provided for under Education Code Section 35570-35579 and 35738 � - ; Rt4T�: Ti�re County Corirrm�tt�e may rerommend, p�rsuant to �ducation � Code Sectiort 35565, to� appaint.a boar�i of arbitrators to resolr�e any 1 disputes between the go�rernirlg> board� of th� affec�ed school districts '. c�nre�rnmg the �ivisior� c�f funtls, pr'�t�ertY� or �b[�gatinns. � 5 � � � CRITERION 4 � 'The reorganization of the districts will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation." I Guidelines The Committee should consider the effects of the following criteria (Title 5 of the � California Administrative Code Section 18573): " The number and percentage of pupils in each racial and ethnic group in � the affected districts as proposed by the transfer of territory • The number and percentage of pupils in each racial and ethnic group of � � the schools of the districts affected ' � ` The number and percentage of pupils in each racial and ethnic group in Ithe schools in the districts affected with those of other schools in adjacent areas of the districts affected I* The trends and rates of present ar�d possibte future growth or change in the total population in the districts affeeted, in each racial and ethnic � group within the total district, and in each school, of the distriets affected ' The school board policies regarding methods of preventing racial and ` ethnic segregation in the affected districts ' The effect of factors such as, distance between schools and attendance � centers, terrain, and geographic features that may involve safety � hazards to pupils, capacity of schools, and related conditions or circumstances that may have an effect on the feasibility of integration of � the affected schools * The effect of the proposal on the duty of the governing board of each of , the districts affected to adopt and implement a plan for the alleviation of f � � segregation of minority pupils under Sections 90 through 101 � j 6 I 1 � The Commiriee should also consider: * participation in extracumcular activities � * equipment of affected school districts * state of facilities of affected school districts . � perception of staff, administrators, and community regarding whether schools are segregated raciaVethnic make up of staff and administration ► CRITERION 5 } 'The proposed reorganization will not result in any substantial increase in costs to the � state." Guidelines I � Pursuant to Title 5 of the Califomia Administrative Code Se�tion 18573, each district affected will be adequate in terms of financial ability if: * the revenue limit per ADA of the proposed district does not vary from the revenue limit per ADA in all of the affected districts by more than 15 ipercent, or * the proposal does not increase costs to the State for the affected � territory by more than 10 per cent � CRITERION 6 'The proposed reorganization will not significantly disrupt the educational p�ograms in Ithe proposed distri�ts and districts affected by the proposed reorganization and will continue to promote sound education performance in those districts." Guidelines � The Committee must look at the effect of the proposal on all school districts affected I � by the reorganiiation. The Committee should look at district-wide programs, and the � school site programs, in schools not a part of the proposal, if any, that will be adversely affected by the proposal. 7 GRITERION 7 'The proposed reorganization should not result in a significant increase in school lhousing costs." I � CRITERION 8 � 'The proposed rearganization is not primarily designed to result in a significant increase in property values causing financial advantage to property owners because Ithe territory was transferred from one schooi district to an adjoining district." , CRITERION 9 , 'The proposed reorganization will not negatively affect the fiscal management or fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization." Guidelines The Committee should took at the percentage o# lost revenue to total revenue of the affected districts. It should also look at the viability of a new school district being able to operate a meaningful educational curriculum with its anticipated revenue. ; 8 CA Codes (edc:35700-35712) EDUCATION CODE SECTION 35700-35712 35700. An action to reorganize one or more districts is initiated upon the filing, wit�i the county superintendent of schools, of a petition to reorganize one or more school districts signed by any of the following: (a) At least 25 percent of the registered voters residing in the territory proposed to be reorganized if the territory is inhabited. Where the petition is to reorganize territory in two or more achool districts, the petition shall be signed by at least 25 percent of the registered voters in that territory in each of those districts. (b) A number of registered voters residing in the territory proposed to be reorganized, equal to at least 8 percent of the votes cast for all candidates for Governor at the last gubernatorial election in the territory proposed to be reorganized, where the affected territory consists of a single school district with over 200,000 pupils in average daily attendance and the petition is to reorganize the district into two or more districts. (c) The owner of the property, provided that territory is uninhabited and the owner thereof has filed either a tentative subdivision map with the appropriate county or city agency or an application for any project, as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources Code, with one or more local agencies. (d) A majority of the members of the governing boards of each of the districts that,would be affected by the proposed reorganization. 35700.1. (a) A county superintendent of schools may do any of the following, as necessary, with respect to the reorganization of school districts within the jurisdiction of a county superintendent of schools: (1) Prior to the initiation of an action to reorganize, a county superintendent of schools may do any of the following: (A) Provide information, coordination, and guidance to potential petitioners for reorganization and to other parties inquiring about the petition process. (B) Provide procedural advice and counseling. (C) Provide information and assiatance for community meetings, information sessions, and briefing sessions. (D) Provide for coordination of inedia and community relations. (2) A county superintendent of schools may perform the following duties for the procesaing and evaluation of multiple petitions to reorganize one or more school districts: (A) Ensure compliance with all requirements pertaining to the petitions. (B) Ensure compliance with all required timelines or deadlines for petitions. (C) Apply new and preexisting evaluation criteria to the petition. (3) A county superintendent of schools may provide assistance to newly reorganized school districts during the interim period, as follows: (A) To ensure smooth transitions with minimum disruption to pupils Page 1 of 6 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=35001-36000&file=... 10/16/20Q 1 CA Codes (edc:35700-35712) and staff. (B) To provide advisory and consulting expertise on any of the fallowing: (i) Board and administrative policies and regulations. (ii) Personnel policies. (iiij Curriculum. (iv} Instructional programs and services. (v) Financial and budgeting functions. (vi) Distribution of assets and liabilities. (b) No funds allocated to the Los Angeles County Office of Education pursuant to the Budget Act shall be used to instigate, solicit, or promote the development of plans to reorganize a school district or school districts within the jurisdiction of the county office of education; provided, however, that the funds may be used to support the research necessary to review and make recommendations regarding reorganization plans that are submitted to the county office of education. 35740.3. A petition filed under Section 35700 shall be required to reasonably identify the territory to be reorganized, which identification may include references to streets or prominent geographic features. The inclusion of legal descriptions or plat maps, or both, however, shall not be a prerequisite for the filing of a valid petition. 35700.5. Before initiating proceedings to consider any reorganization plan, the county committee on school district organization shall provide written notice of the proposed action to the local agency formation commission for the affected area. 35701. In any petition to reorganize school districts there shall be designated no more than three of the petitioners as chief petitioners for the purpose of receiving notice of any public hearings to be heZd on the petition. 35702. The persons securing the signatures to a petition of electors to reorganize school distric�s shall attach thereto an affidavit that all persons who signed the petition did so in the presence of the affiant and that each signature is a genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be_ 35703. Any petition filed under this article may include any of the appropriate provisions specified in Article 3(commencing with Section 35730). 35704. The county superintendent of schools, within 30 days after any petition for reorganization is filed, shall examine the petition and, if he or she finds it to be sufficient and signed as required by Page 2 of 6 http;//www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=35001-36000&file=... 10/ 16/2001 CA Codes (edc:35700-35712) law, transmit the petition simultaneously to the county committee and to the State Board of Education. 35705. Within 60 days after receipt of the petition, the county committee shall hold one or more public hearings thereon at a regular or special meeting in each of the districts affected by the petition. Notice of the public hearing shall be given at least 10 days in advance thereof to not more than three persons designated in the petition as the chief petitioners, to the governing board of all districts affected by the proposed reorganization, and to alI other persons requesting notice of the hearing. 35705.5. (a) The county committee may add to the petition any of the appropriate provisions specified in Article 3(commencing with Section 35730) which were not included in the petition as filed and may amend any such provision which was so included. (b) At least 10 days before the public hearing, or hearings, on the petition, the county committee shall make available to the public and to the governing boards affected by the petition a description of the petition, including all of the following: (1) The rights of the employees in the affected districts to continued employment. (2) The revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance for each affected district and the effect of the petition, if approved, on such revenue limit. (3) Whether the districts involved will be governed, in part, by provisions of a city charter and, if so, in what way. (4) Whether the governing boards of any proposed new district will have five or seven members. (5) A description of the territory or districts in which the election, if any, will be held. (6) Where the proposal is to create two or more districts, whether the proposal will be voted on as a single proposition. (7) Whether the governing board of any new district will have trustee areas and, if so, whether the trustees will be elected by only the voters of that trustee area or by the voters of the entire district. (e) A description of how the property, obligations, and bonded indebtedness of existing districts will be divided. (9) A description of when the first governing board of any new district will be elected and how the terms of office for each new trustee will be determined. 35706. Within 120 days of the commencement of the first public hearing on the petition, the county committee shall recommend approval or disapproval of a petition for unification of school districts or for the division of the territory of an existing school district into two or more separate school districts, as the petition may be augmented, or shall approve or disapprove a petition for the transfer of territory, as the petition may be augmented. 35706.5. (a) No action to reorganize the boundaries of a school district shall be initiated or completed without the consent of a Page 3 of 6 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=35001-36000&file=... 10/ 16/2001 CA Codes (edc:35700-35712) majority of all of the members of the governing board of the school district if both of the following conditions apply to the school district: (1) It has obtained an emergency apportionment loan from the State of California, but the Superintendent of Public Instruction has determined that a state administrator is no longer necessary, and has restored, prior to the effective date of this section, the legal rights, duties, and powers of the governing board of the district pursuant to Section 41326. (2) It has a student population 70 percent of which is from either a"lower income household" or "very low income household" as those terms are defined in Sections 50079.5 and 50105, respectively, of the Health and Safety Code. (b) For purposes of this section, for any school district that meets the description specified in paragraph (1), consent to an action to reorganize the boundaries of the school district shall no longer be required when 10 years have elapsed from the date of final payment by the school district of the emergency loan to the State of California. 35707. (a) Except for petitions for the transfer of territory, the county committee shall expeditiously transmit the petition to the State Board of Education together with its recommendations thereon. It shall also report whether any of the following, in the opinion of the committee, would be true regarding the proposed reorganization as described in the petition: (1) It would adversely affect the school district organization of the county. (2) It would comply with the provisions of Section 35753. (b) Petitions for transfers of territory shall be transmitted pursuant to Section 35704. 35708. The petition transmitted pursuant to Section 35707, including the plans and recommendations included therein, if any, together with the recommended approval or disapproval and the plans and recommendations, if any, of the county committee shall be heard by the State Board of Education as provided in Article 4(commencing with Section 35750). 35709. If the following conditions are met, the county committee may approve the petition and order that the petition be granted, and shall so notify the county board of supervisors: (a) The county committee finds that the conditions enumerated in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 35753 are substantially met, and: (b) Either: (1) The petition is to transfer uninhabited territory from one district to another and the owner of the territory, or a majority of the owners of the territory, and the governing boards of all school districts involved in the transfer consent to the transfer; or (2) The petition is to transfer inhabited territory of less than 10 percent of the assessed valuation of the district from which the territory is being transferred, and all of the governing boards have consented to the transfer. Page 4 of 6 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=35001-36000&file=... 10/ 16/2001 CA Codes (edc:35700-35712) 35710. For all other petitions to transfer territory, if the county committee finds that the conditions enumerated in paragraphs (1) to (10), inclusive, of subdivision (a) of Section 35753 are substantially met, the county committee may approve the petition and, if approved, shall so notify the county superintendent of schools who shall call an election in the territory of the districts as determined by the county committee and in the manner described in Part 4(commencing with Section 5000) to be conducted at the next regular election. 35710.5. (a) An action by the county committee approving or disapproving a petition pursuant to Section 35709 or 35710 may be appealed to the State Board of Education by the chief petitioners or one or more affected school districts. The appeal shall be limited to issues of noncompliance with the provisions of Section 35705, 35706, 35709, or 35710. If an appeal is made as to the issue of whether the proposed transfer will adversely affect the racial or ethnic integration of the schools of the districts affected, it shall be made pursuant to Section 35711. (b) Within five days after the final action of the county committee, the appellant shall file with the county committee a notice of appeal and shall provide a copy to the county superintendent of schools, except that if the appellant is one of the affected school districts it shall have 30 days to file the notice of appeal with the county committee and provide a copy to the county superintendent. Upon the filing of the notice of appeal, the action of the county committee shall be stayed, pending the outcome of the appeal. Within 15 days after the filing of the notice of appeal, the appellant shall file with the county committee a statement of reasons and factual evidence. The county committee shall then, within 15 days of receipt of the statement, send to the State Board of Education the atatement and the complete administrative record of the county committee proceedings, including minutes of the oral proceedings. (c) Upon receipt of the appeal, the State Board of Education may elect either to review the appeal, or to ratify the county committee' s decision by summarily denying review of the appeal. The board may review the appeal either solely on the administrative record or in conjunction with a public hearing. Following the review, the board shall affirm or reverse the action of the county committee, and if the petition will be sent to election, shall determine the territory in which the election is to be held. The board may reverse or modify the action of the county committee in any manner consistent with law. (d) The decision of the board shall be sent to the county committee which shall then notify the county board of supervisors or the county superintendent of schools pursuant to Section 35709 or 35710, as appropriate. 35710.51. The county superintendent of schools, within 35 days after receiving the notification provided by Section 35710, shall call an election, in the manner prescribed in Part 4(commencing with Section 5000), to be conducted at the next available regular election, in the territory of districts as determined by the county committee on school district organization, or, in the case of Page 5 of 6 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=35001-36000&file=... 10/16/2001 CA Codes (edc:35700-35712) territory transfers appealed to the State Board of Education pursuant to Section 35710.5(c), as determined by the State Board of Education. The county superintendent shall not issue an order of election until after the time for an appeal pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 35710.5 has elapsed. 35711. Any person questioning the finding of the county committee pursuant to Section 35709 or 35710 that the proposed transfer of territory will not adversely affect the racial or ethnic integration of the schools of the districts affected, may appeal a decision made upon such a finding. The appeal shall be made to the State Board of Education within 30 days. The appeal shall be based upon factual and statistical evidence. If the State Board of Education denies the appeal, the decision of the county committee shall stand. If the State Board of Education approves the appeal, it shall review the findings of the county committee at a regular meeting of the board. The State Board of Education shall notify the county committee on ita decision on the appeal. If the State Board of Education approves the appeal, the county committee shall transmit a copy of the proceedings to the State Board of Education within 3o days after receipt of notice. The State Board of Education shall review the transcript, considering alZ factors involved. The State Board of Education may reverse, or may affirm, the decision of the county committee, or if it appears that inadequate consideration was given to the effect of the transfer on integration of the schools of the districts affected, it shall direct the county committee to reconsider its decision and for this purpose to hold another hearing. 35712. The State Board of Education may adopt rules and regulations for the implementation of this article, as it deems necessary. Page 6 of 6 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=35001-36000&file=... 10/16/2001 CA Codes (edc:35720-35724) EDUCATION CODE SECTION 35720-35724 35720. Each county committee on school district organization shall, under the direction of the State Board of Education, formulate plans and recommendations for the organization of the districts in the county or any partion �hereof including, if appropriate, a portian of one or more adjacent counties. 35720.5. (a) The county committee shall adopt a tentative recommendation following which action it shall hold one or more public hearings in the area proposed for reorganization at least 30 days prior to submission of a final recommendation for unification or other reorganization to the State Board of Education. (b) The public hearing required by this section shall be called when both of the following conditions are met : (1) Notice is sent to the governing board of each school district involved at least l0 days before the hearing. �(2) Notice of the hearing is either published in a newspaper of general circulation or posted in every schoolhouse and at least three public places in the affected territory, district, or districts. (c) The notice shall contain information as to the time, place, and purpose of the hearing. 35721. (a) On receipt of a petition signed by at least 10 percent of the qualified electors residing in any district for a consideration of unification or other reorganization of any area, the county committee shall hold a public hearing on the petition at a regular or special meeting. (b) On receipt of a petition signed by at least 5 percent of the qualified electors residing in a school district with over 200,000 pupils in average daily attendance in which the petition is to reorganize the district into two or more districts, the county committee shall hold a public hearing on the petition at a regular or special meeting. (c) On receipt of a resolution approved by a majority of the members of a city council, county board of supervisors, governing body of a special district, or local agency formation commission that has jurisdiction over all or a portion of the school district for consideration of unification or other reorganization of any area, the county committee shall hold a public hearing on the proposal at a regular or special meeting. (d) Following the hearing conducted pursuant to subdivision (a), (b), or (c), the county committee shall grant or deny the petition. If the county committee grants the petition, it shall adopt a tentative recommendation following which action it shall hold one or more public hearings in the area proposed for reorganization. The provisions of Sections 35705 and 35705.5 shall apply to any such public hearing. 35721.5. Before initiating proceedings to consider any reorganization plan, the county committee on school district Page 1 of 3 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=35001-36000&file=... 10/16/2001 CA Codes (edc:35720-35724) organization shall provide written notice of the proposed action to the local agency formation commission for the affected area. 35722. Following the public hearing, or last public hearing, required by Section 35720.5 or subdivision (c) of Section 35721, the county committee may adopt a final recommendation for unification or other reorganization and shall transmit that recommendation together with the petition filed under subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 35721, if any, to the State Board of Education for hearing as provided in Article 4(commencing with Section 35750); or shall transmit the petition to the State Board of Education and order the reorganization granted if the requirements of Section 35709 are satisfied; or shall transmit the petition to the State Board of Education and order that an election be held if the requirements of Section 35710 are satisfied. Page 2 of 3 35723. When a county committee selects an area for study for possible recommendation for reorganization which includes territory of one or more school districts under the jurisdiction of the county superintendent of schools of another county, the county committee shall so notify the members of the county committee of such other county. Thereafter, the members of the county committee of such other county shall be notified by mail of each public hearing or meeting of the county committee at which the proposed reorganization will be considered at least 10 days prior to the day of such hearing or meeting. - - _. 35724. If plans and recommendations adopted by a county committee propose changes in the boundaries or status of school districts under the jurisdiction of the superintendent of any adjacent county, the county committee of each such adjacent county shall be requested in writing to concur in the plans and recommendations. If the county committee of an adjacent county concurs in the plans and recommendations,. the concurrence shall accompany the recommendations transmitted to the State Board of Education. If the county committee of an adjacent county fails to respond to the request for concurrence within 90 days of the date of the request, such failure shall be deemed to be a concurrence in the plans and recommendations. If a county committee of an adjacent county does not concur in the plans and recommendations, it shall so notify the other county committee in writing and accompany the notification with plans and recommendations for the reorganization of school districts of its county including territory that would be affected by the plans and recommendations of the other county committee. After 60 days from the notification of nonconcurrence, if the county committees are still unable to agree upon plans and recommendations for reorganization of the territory, the county committees, or any of them, may submit plans and recommendations to the State Board of Education, and the board may approve or reject the plans, or any of them, in the same manner as other plans and recommendations. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=edc&group=35001-36000&file=... 10/16/2001 FE3�,"'r—:9�h 1.�.-:� FR01"I RC.CiE—Ir.fc. Tcchno:o5s� TO 9�6193=�17098 P.O� ----- . . s iu fhe Superintenden► ' Sctlmla a! Rl�sitJ��+ov� Pur tiant ,to Educatlan `r � �`da on 3570Q, suR�clivfifan (a�, lhe +tgned, constit�.�ting et �ea�t ZS percent of t �g (Rtarvd eteCtors sidlnp in the terr{to proposed to be trintisrred, now WI! the boundari�s oi the orone-Norco Un fted I Diit,riet of Riversldc C�upty, etitian th�t the haundari�s of th orons orco 1Jn Sehoot b(strict he ch�ngpd ta inai� from it the territar h eina r criped. ihe d�rsiqned potiti4n th�t e t,erritory be transt�rr�d ' incl ed within thv Rfvers Uniffed Srhen[ Distr t of Rivtrslde County. Th� prape y tn b r�nxferred is er1 �s foiloMrs: 3ectlon e+ T thlpr4 aa„t R g' re t, nE s!te �a�C v��•h�If vf Ser..tien 7� esttl Towns,f� ano A�na• The und rsign regutst he h qes In �h� pestive Lioundaries of the ools dlstricts ' for ths ollowing r . �� 1. Stu ent6 In t ter►' t4 ba transferr al� Qy ertd scheol lr� t Rivercid• Unl ed Sc�D' iCt undlr i d trt a �. 7he trens r td redusx trs sin� d� an • of itud�n! ,n the trensfer. 3. Tha r�nsftr would Corre u iatf� t�dlti ns w existi . k� The 1 ntf�r wiU not efPe, t t � ra I or ethnic i rstfon e schoals vi tha dlser� Involved. 5. R��idvnti the ■reA iden with thr �ity of R� de, nat Curonz. G. 5ervtces u�e '�nts, sueh as s , tors. ho�pit�ls� ehurches, Boy Sccutt, •s�d Littfe I_eague are s • City of Rivsruidr. Namo (,print ar typ�) Addr�es The Chief P�tltipn�r� for the T. purpose ai receFvins notiqi, Z. etc., are: 3. -- -�-- .,_...._ .... �. � _...._,_ ,_..__. � ,� . ..._ _ . h��t � xrstu�ncB �6�Aoss -- �� � F»�r AF�1rF l'S6 SM� ' ` , . nM --.._ .� -�� n i i i �.��� 1 rrinr I;Mr , Ly Sh� �N��! i1rN 2 - 9Mf+i Chf tl� FM Ae.It f�Nt � � _... � � /rl�l �Clh Lip I �k� �tva. N Nnx � ! � � �rlb4 �Jtl �1� NM k a k �Vsel g 1 P�lm lCMr AI� 6 �M ._,., , 1 N�.4 fS�rrr �� IM } C11f Tj� M Na k �R�at i ��i�� cur xa s,�n n,,. � �..N 1 d . . i I�pr CpW� TJ► i ��� h',• A. S1r.N � �`'� CIM y{� 5i�� Ne.4 �trk� IQ Iri�� ' CMM ZI� � I e. i�, SMeK ` i l _... ..._ _.., � ' 1 Ir�r � CUy tlr I wM %i0, � ihM � �� _ . „ rnn� . ' [ut �tr �M lNakiww I3 .. _. . r�� � nrr »p OIV� ti�� � Wne� �,,, f�L� _ . .�.._... � iCM��r ... . 2I6 iw��Il i � M�M i ha � iv.w 1 15 � � .��.� I ��5� , ��� �MP4RTl►NT! Ri SURE 70 C4MPLT�TE pk:CLAMt�TiOM 4f �IRCUI.ATOR �. 8M OTf�EH tilDB oF Ttili PA(%R FEB-0"-1?9b 1�� i3 _ FR01•I R!;OE—Info. Tcchr,o:cab TO � i . . .. ..� Tu tli4 SuperintendPnt cf t�is vf ' s�d CQunty: Pursuar�t to EduC�lfon Co�S o� 35700, subdivision (a1, the und at ler�t 25 perr.�nt nf the ictervd ei ors resfdirjg In the territur trA�sferred, now w'sthin underl�s t c Cor�n��Norco Unified Rivsrsid� Cauniy, pe nn lhat the bou r: the Corone-Noreo he e:h�nged ta elim' t• frotn it the terrl r ereftt�fter �l�iCrib� petitfon that the ..rrltory be tr�nsf�rre and Ineluded withtn e Schwl Dl�ctrf�t Rivcrside Ceunty The proptrty o t�e transfer�ld f! ribed a f011ows: 91619"°�4: i0?8 P.03 eC, constitutiny pased to be d Dlst�fct of � 5choo! D(strir,t unde�slgned �slCe Unifled S�etten 2 TOMR:�ip G �qykh� NI at� AnE LhC ! t on1•half uf cCfon 3� xntd ShiD �nd R�nys 'fhe und�r ign request t c n s in the e pe e ba dariei of t e�choots dlstricts f�r tht f low 9 re4ao 1. S!u nts the te �i to be tr� P r cady a te d fchoo in thc Riverstdc Uni ed Sch Dia i t under Int - t ic �gr��men 2, 7 transfer w I reduc� t ravel ti and dlstante of st ents in the transfer. 3� T trin�fer uld carrcct s iitta ory oondition� now c tiny. a, 7h trans Ii not effect e raclal or uthnic int�gr�tio of th� schools, ai th� �!i! rl�t ved. 5. Re den r of th� �re■ identl/r wfth th� City of Rlvfr , not Cor'vM. , h. Se� Ices uscd by r�tide»L�, such as stores, doetor , hosplt�lt, churchrs, eoy 5cout�, and I.fttle Leagua ara �II locat�d in tltt City af ir�id�. Naae (Priat t�) Addrees The Chie etitfOnor� for the i. purpose of ei'v(ng natices, ,� J etc., aCe; ���_ �� - �Aa'IL' —` _.'.•. � R�4IDENCE AUQREb�� �� . .. -- � � �n< —n - — — -- � ��P No. k Ilkr! 1�t;wr r��� � N6 i 5rrt 17 !�� Cbr :Ip� FtaJ� SW�11 �e �,u, ti:, , sy„ n.. r sr.R 9 Ynnl . � ��' 'O SII� hF R i1fYr /rM Clt� -�_� � ro�USCFICI _� �..�� � �. Z�4 � z� LM I� f =1� � OECWIAfIOM 0� CIIICUUTOA fE.C. hh) �� - - � it�t� q fnilaw�= IP1'7fli�d fliA� oT t7rcul�tCf1 th�t nq� �estae�o..aa��. �s: (NuiWP �na strnt) t��ey �no cTp �nde� TpeE 1 C1f0YLt�d CM fureqojng peEiMen er� sa+ q:e �p�nUid si�9n�*��ea DASfq writt�n� thet �oocrdt+g Co my Ms+ in►ern�tlon �nd'pe1��f, �M'.�1 s�QMture (6 Ei1A QMY�M fIqM4Vt� qf thA perlon YA10if nMM i! Pur}qrt� ��i ilu�t tI1R Elt�t b�t�wen tihich nii siqnlwr�t rA th� p�Clt4on w.ra �t�inad ���: ana , �iglno�np u.rw) ' irA0tn9 wtrl And 1 e��t4fy� under Yenalf.y of perjury� tnot CNi= O�Ot�r�liun {s erue �nd CO��kt. ts�qnaeu�r: or �irouutvr! (i��cludinp flrrc n�M * mfddla Inf+l�l �,r firaf 1nit401 • ��tltll� n��lr) •~ . !IIIFN I'.H.' r � SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE REQUIRED CRITERIA � Criterion 7: The new district� will be adequate in terms of pupils_enrotled. Response: PSUSD and DSUSD are large districts with enrollments far in excess of statutory requirements. The inclusion or exclusion of students from the subject area will not significantly impact their conforming status. • Criterion 2: The transfer would be organized on the basis of substantial community identity. Response; Over 80% of the city is within DSUSD with enrollment of approximately 4,590 students in five schools within the city and one school directly adjacent. Currently the subject area is serviced by PSUSD with an elementary school in Thousand Palms, a middte school and high school in Cathedral City. The proposed district transfer would place at4 Palm Desert students within DSUSD to be served by schools within the city. Neighborhood schools provide the focus for community identity. It is therefore our desire for all students within Palm Desert be served by a single unified school district. • Criterion 3: The proposal will result in an equitable division of property and faci{ities of the original district ar districts. Response: There are currently no school assets in the subject area. • Criterion 4: The reorganization of the districts will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation. � � SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE REQUIRED CRITERIA Response: The proposed General Plan Land Use Plan for the area includes a broad range of housing opportunities consistent with socio-economic, ethnic and racial diversity. • Criterion 5: The proposed reorganization will not result in substantial increased costs to the state. Response: The transfer should not cause any increase in state costs since few students currently live in the subject area and costs wil! simply shift from one district to another. • Criterion 6: The proposed reorganization wil! not significantly disrupt the educational programs in the proposed district or districts affected by the proposed reorganization and will continue to promote sound educational performance in those districts. Response: The proposed transfer will have no effect on educationa{ programs. • Criterion 7: The proposed reorganization should not result in a significant increase in school housing costs. Response: School facilities costs will not remain the same regardless of district. • Criterion 8: The proposed reorganization is not primarily designed to result in a significant increase in property value causing financial advantage to property owners because territory was transferred from one school district to an adjoining dist�ict. 2 0 � SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE REQUIRED CRITERIA w Response: Both districts are considered to be equally desirable. The change is being requested based on a uniform community ide�tity. � Criterion 9: - The proposed reorganization will not negatively affect the fiscal management or fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization. Response: � While the transfer- will shift revenues fr'om PSUSD to DSUSD; the ' corresponding obligation to provide educational services will also be shifted. Given the diversity of residential and commercial land uses proposed for this area, the fiscal balance of each district should not be impacted. School district developer fee studies have historically identified a revenue shortfall between educational costs and revenues. � 1 � , � ATTACHMENT 11 � r ` CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF CO1�lUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Caty Council Members FROM: Phzl Drell, Director of Community Development DATE: December 13, 2Q01 SUBJECT: Resolution initiating School District Boundary change process for the area north of Frank Sinatra Drive from Palm Spr�.ngs Unified School District to Desert Sands Unzfied Schaol District. I. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resoiution No.01-117initiating school district boundary change. TI. BACKGROUND: On November 12, 2001, The Czty Council directed staff to prepare a resolution initiating the boundary change process transferrinq the area north of Frank Sinatra Drive from Palm Spr�ngs Unif�.ed School D�.strict to Desert Sands Unified School District. The attached resolut�on has been prepared pursuant to the California Education Code, sect�on 35753, and has been reviewed by our czty attorney and County School Board staff. IV. ATTACHNN�NTS: 1. Draft Resolution � STAFF REPORT : CASE NOS. GPA DECEMBER 13,, 2001 Prepared by: Reviewed and Approved by: ���/ � `� � DANIEL BILYEU PHILIP DRELL PLANNING INTEREN DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Review and Concur: � /�,�-� k�I�D J. Ff�,TCERS ASS STANT C�.TY MANAGER OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Rev�.ew and Concur : CARLOS L. 0 GA CITY MANAGE CITY COUNCI�i,ACTION: APPROVED DENIED RECEIVED O�HER MEETIN(o', DATE 1 n2--� �-�—�n f AYES: ' NOE3: �� ,�s AHSENT: � R,�� � ABSTAIN: �+� ) ' VERIE'IED BY: � ,�J � �riginal on File with �erk's Offlce ATTACHMENT 12 MINUTES REGULAR PALM DESERT ClTY C�UNCII. MEETING DECEMBER 13, 2001 Councifman Spiegel asked if it would be diffcult to add four feet later ` if the Council felt it was necessary after #he road is completed. Mr. Folkers responcled that it would be difficult to do because of the smoke trees, but it could be done. ' Mayor Kel�y called far the vote, and the motion carried by a 4-1 vote, with Mayor Kelly vating NO. IX. RESOLUTtONS A. � RESOLUTION NO. 01-117 -A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CUUNCIL QF THE C[TY �F PALM DESERT, CAL{FORNIA, REQUESTING CONSIDERATION BY THE RIUER5IDE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON SCHOOL OISTRICTORGANIZATION, FORTHETRANSFER OF CERTAlN TERRITORY FR�M PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH(�4L DISTRiCT. Planning lntern Daniel B�lyeu reviewed the staff report, noting that he felt the Caunty would probably not approve this because on(y eight of the nine criteria in the Education Code were met. He said PaIm Springs Unified Schoal District was concemed because it would lose approximately $38 million over a 40-year period due to this proposed boundary change which would piace atl of Palm Desert's schools wi#�rin the Desert Sands Unified School District. Councifman Ferguson said ii had always been his belief that the fees paid #a the school district wers to offse# the costs incurred by the district in educating those students. if those students are then in Desert Sands Unified School District, Palm Springs Unified wiil have lost an expensa as well as an income item, and they shoutd balance each other out and be zero. Councilman Spiegel nated that Sacramento rather than the County had the final say. He said this wauld be Palm Desert's last chance to try to take the matter to Sacramento to get the entire cEty within one school district. Counciiman Spiegef moved to waive fu�ther reading and adopt Resolution No. 01-9 97. Motion was seconded by Crites and carried by a 5-0 vote. �� �� �- �---�'"�.�--�`�" � 1T RESOLUT'ION NO. ol-il� � A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNiA, REQUESTING CONSIDERATION BY THE RIYERSIDE COUNTY COMMITTEE 4N SCHOOL DiSTRICT ORiGAIJIZATION, F�R THE TR.ANSFER OF CERTAIN TERRITORY FROM PALM SPRTNGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRTCT TO DESERT Sf1NDS LINIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. Wk�REAS, the majority of the land azea of the City of Palm Desert is within the boundaries of the Desert Sands Unified School District; and VVI-IEREAS, the area within t6e City af Palm Desert generalfy located North of Frank Sinatra and South of the Pacific railway- right of way is also within the boundaries of the Palm Springs Unified Schooi District and is described in Exhibit "A" attached; and 0 WI�EREAS,. The city of Palm Desert desires that the City be serviced by only one school distriat, Desert Sands UniSed School District to promote • a uniFed community identity. The proposed transfer substantially meets the criteria set forth in Education Code Section 35753. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Paim Desert requests the R.iverside County Committee on School District Organization to initiate proceed'mgs to accomplish the transfer of territory as described in Exhibit "A" from Palm Springs Unified School District ta Desert Sands Unified Schoal Districi. RESOLUTI�N NO. o r-i i� 0 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPED at a regvlar meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this _13t� , day of December , 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BEN50N, CRITES, FERGUSON. SPIEGEL, iCELLY NOES: �oN� ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE RICHARD S. KELLY, MA flR � ATTEST: SHEILA R. GILLIGAN Ci lerk � � �' City of PaUn Desert, California RESOLUTIOK N0. O1-i17 City of Palm Desert Exhibit "A�' � � In th� City oT Palm D�sfrt, Coanty of Riv�r:id�, Stato ot Ca{Narnis� b�ing slt that e�rtain raal prop�rty bo�ad�d as �oilows: E Oe th� w�st dr !be a�ahrliri�r of Monter�y Awn��. On tb� south b� th� cfntariin� ai F�nk Sinatra Drnr�. Oa th� nvr��ast by tl�a soafbwest �igbt-vf-wsY Na� of ths Union PaciHc R�ilroad. Co�nprising 2,2x9 acr�sl�.4a sq. Mi., moro ar les�. � 0 RBSOLUTION P0. 01-117 Assessor parce! numbe�s affected by school district i�erriiory transfer 6i8590003 653370018 653420019 653673005 $53676003 853683004 653885Q23 653721018 653752003 � 618590004 653370020 85342002a 653673006 653$78004 653683005 853885�24 653721037 653752004 828230025 853370021 85342Q021 6538740Q1 653676005 653883006 853885025 65372105H 853752005 62623b025 653370022 853671001 853674Q02 853676006 653863007 653685026 653722024 853752006 82623p025 653370423 8536710Q2 8536740Q3 853B77001 653683008 953685027 853722043 653752007 853250005 853370024 85387'1003 653874004 853677002 653683009 853885828 853722062 653752008 BS3250008 653384001 653671004 853674Q05 853677003 653683010 853685Q29 653T30001 653752009 6532500Q7 853380002 653671005 85367�t008 653677004 853683011 853885030 853730002 853752010 853250014-853380003 853671008 853874008 853877005 853883Q12 653885031 85373fl003 853?52011 853250d15 853380004 6536790Q7 653874009 8538770Q8 653884aDt 853690012 853730004 853752012 653250Q16 653380005 653671008 653874010 853677007 653884002 6536900f3 653T30005 653752073 853250017 853380008 853871009 853674011 6538770Q8 653884003 85S890Q15 653730008 853752014 653250Q18 653380019 65367'I010 653674d12 65368100t 653884d04 653690016 853730007 653752015 653250019 65338DOZQ 653672001 553874013 653881002 653684005 853890�77 653730008 6537520'18 853250020 8533�f0021 853872002 853874014 85388'1003 6538$4006 853890018 853730009 $53780001 653250021 853�80022 853672003 653674075 653881004 8536�007 65389QOt9 653730010 8537B0002 653260005 853380Q25 8536T2004 853675001 85368'1005 683884008 853710001 853730011 853760003 $532804t8 85336Q031 853872005 853575002 85388t008 853884009 853710002 653730012 853760004 853260018 653390d32 6538T20�6 853675003 653881007 653684410 653710003 853730Q13 653780Q05 853280021 653390033 653872007 6536TSOd4 653881D08 853885009 8537100Ci4 853730014 853780006 653280022 853380434 853672008 653875005 853887009 65368500Z 653710005 8537�OQ01 8537800Q7 653280023 653390D49 853872008 653875008 65368101Q 853685003 H53710008 853740002 853760008 653280024 853390QS8 8536720i0 653675007 653681019 653885004 8537900Q7' 65374QOQ3 853760009 653280025 853390057 853872011 853875008 653881012 853685005 853740008 853751001 653780010 853280028 653390Q56 653872012 853675409 653682001 653885006 853T1Q0� 653751d02 653780011 � 653280029 653390064 6538T2Q13 6536750i0 653682002 8538850d7 8537100t0 85375t003 6537800'f2 65326D030 853390061 853872014 653675011 853882003 8�3685008 853710014 653751004 853780013 B532800Z4 853400030 853672015 853675012 653882004 653685008 653720004 6537510Q5 5537800i4 653280029 65340003'! 853872018 653675d13 6.5�82005 853685U10 65372�OOS 853751006 653760015 653370002 853400032 653872017 853875014 853882008 653685011 853720008 853751007 853T80016 653370QQ3 853400033 b538T2018 6535754i5 653682007 853685012 653724010 653751008 853780017 853370004 8534ti0034 853872019 653675016 653882008 853685013 6537200ii 653751009 653780018 653370005 653400Q37 6538T2020 853675017 853882009 8536880i4 853720012 8537510'!0 85341�025 65337�008 853d00038 85367Z021 653675018 65368Z090 �53885015 6537200'13 653751011 8534?AOiO G53370007 853400041 853672Q2'1 8536750f9 853882�1t 8538a5018 853720Q14 853751Q12 653678002 853370008 053�l0093 853873001 9538750Z0 853882012 853885017 653720015 653751�13 85388542'i 653370015 85341Q022 653673802 653675021 653683001 653885418 653720016 853751014 853885022 653370017 653410023 653673003 853675072 6538830Q2 653885019 653720a17 8537510i5 853752001 85337W18 853410024 85'J673Q0� 65367600i 853883003 853885020 653720018 653751018 653752002 , � J ATTACHMENT 13 DR. DAVID LONG Riverside CwiAy Supennhnde�d of S�hook c -�.-��'�".-. '.W,'f��:'�%ac�,�-T�� 3939 Thirteenth Street P.O. Box 868 Riverside, California 92502-0868 47-336 Oasis Street Indio, California 92201-6998 �����yEt� ,ii-If�� � t� ,r,'�, :{�.L• � ���:� �:t��iH!,'N1rY EE�=If?f�A�cN7 pEPAR'i'�fENT C!?Y 0�= PkJ!1 �FSER? January 9, 2002 Dr. William Diedrich, Superintendent Palm Springs USD 980 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 101 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Dear Dr. Diedrich: EncIosed please find a copy of a city council resolution recently received by the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization. Education Code 2a9so �as Brisas Road Section 35721(c), effective January 1, 2001, allows members of a city council, Murrieta, California 92562 among other groups, to petition the County Committee proposing a transfer of territory from one school district to another. Riverside County Board of Education Marilyn Baumert President Gerald P. Colapinto Vice President Charles H. Brugh Betty Gibbel Curtis Grassman Milo P. Johnson William R. Kroonen The County Committee is required to hold a preliminary public hearing on this proposal. Accordingly, such a hearing is scheduled for 6:30 p.m., February 20, 2002, at the Workforce Development Center, Conference Center Entrance, 44-199 Monroe Street Suite B, Indio CA 92201. Meeting information will be mailed 10 days prior to this hearing. If you have any questions about this process, please feel free to call my office at your convenience. Sincerely, C'y-I' / '" �-'' {�----' Sharen Topham, Manager School District Organization Govemmental Relations and Support Services (909) 826-6448 FAX [909] 826-6363 ST:dk Enclosure c: Phil Drell, Planning Director, City af Palm Desert Daniel Bilyeu, Planning Department � �:���� �-, �, �.�:�:-:� ���..z� . �. . {� • • ' ' {Wr DR DA41D LONG Riverside Cour�y Superudende�d of Schools *�;a�:����"�� 3939 Thirteenth Street P0. Box 868 Riverside, California 92502-0868 47-336 Oasis Street Indio, Califomia 9Z201-6998 January 9, 2002 Dr. Doris Wilson, Superintendent Desert Sands USD 47-950 Dune Palms Road La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Dr. Wilson: Enclosed please find a copy of a city council resolution recently received by the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization. Education Code za9so �as s��sas Road Section 35721(c), effective January 1, 2001, allows members of a city council, Murrieta, California 92562 among other groups, to petition the County Committee proposing a transfer of territory from one school district to another. Riverside County Board of Education Marilyn Baumert President Gerald P Colapinto Vice President Charles H. Brugh Betty Gibbel Curtis Grassman Milo P. Johnson William R. Kroonen The County Committee is required to hold a preliminary public hearing on this proposal. Accordingly, such a hearing is scheduled for 6:30 p.m., February 20, 2002, at the Workforce Development Center, Conference Center Entrance, 44-199 Monroe Street Suite B, Indio CA 92201. Meeting information will be mailed 10 days prior to this hearing. If you have any questions about this process, please feel free to call my office at your convenience. Sincerely, � ���� Sharen Topham, Manager School District Organization Governmental Relations and Support Services (909) 826-6448 FAX [909] 826-6363 ST:dk Enclosure c: Phil Drell, Planning Director, City of Palm Desert Daniel Bilyeu, Planning Department .� s:�;�:��-w;:: �:-�:.�:k,� .r s RESOLUTION NO. 01-11� A RESOLUTTON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING CONSIDERATION BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY COM1vIITTEE ON SCHOOL DISTRICT ORIGATiIZATION, FOR THE 'IRANSFER OF CERTAIN TERRITORY FROM PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. VV�-�EREAS, t�� majo�ity c�f the Iand area �f th� City of Patm Des�� t is within the boundaries of the Desert Sands Unified School District; and VVHEREAS, the area witlun the City of Palm Desert generally located North of Frank Sinatra and South of the Pacific railway- right of way is also withi� the boundaries of the Palm Springs Unified School District and is described in Exhibit "A" attached; and WHEREAS,. The city of Palm Desert desires that the City be serviced by only one school dishrict, Desert Sands Unified School District to promote a unified community identity. The proposed transfer substantially meets the criteria set forth in Education Code Section 35753. NOW, T�-�REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Palm Deszrt re�uests ;he R.iv�rside Cou�ty Cemrnittee on School District Organization to initiate proceedings to accomplish the transfer of territory as described in E�ibit "A" from Palm Springs Unified School District to Desert Sands Unified School District. . �_ - .; -._, � � �. \ ; RESOLUTION NO. 01-117 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, held on this 13th ,�y of December , 2001, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BENSON, CRITES, FERGUSON, SPIEGEL, KELLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: rrortE ABSTAIN: NONE . `�/G"/ RICHARD S. KELLY, MA�OR ATTEST: ���SHEILA R. GILLIGAN City Clerk �' City of Palm Desert, California EACH DOCUMENT TO Y�fNICH T�?IS CERYdii�Ai'E 4'� ATTACH��. lS CERT�FlF.D T.1 8: '� FUtt. i�•;;�� :`�'� CORt�ECT CCPf OF i�-l; Ci:s:3.;i�laL L'i'! Fii.F n,�+� '��'S R%CC'iSD Y Of���:.�. Oated: �r��� '�G�� Sti::�^� r�. GlLLtu.��l. City C;erfc Ci:' ' F .� -!. Ca{iiotni �� �- , � ���' �s� �a�.�' � , RESOLUTION NO. 01-117 � Ci of Palm Desert . . tY � � Exhibit "A" � i i �� �,,. w ' f�. . � �. � • �; . . � ` `�� � � � �_ � i JII 3..Y�� �� �� � ; ���� � � �".r� _ � � . � ��'1j.L:1 � - i��:��� ...,; . �" �� =. .. iu- �a. � � .�rr� � ► � ��L au��.�.Er ���L� ��. N � E '"� �'= d C In thQ City of Palm DQsert, County of RivQrsido, State of California, b�ing all that cortain '� rea! prop2r� bc+�ndee! ss failow�: � �r +� On the west by the centeriine of Monterey Avenue. � On tbe south by the �enterline of Frank Sinatra Drive. , � , � O� the northeast by the southwest right-of-way line of the Union Pacific Railr�oad. � ; Comprising 2,229 acresl3.48 sq. mi., more arr less. � � 1C�JVLU1lUlV LVU. U1-11/ Assessor parcel numbers affected by school district territory transfer � 618590003 653370019 653420019 653673005 653676003 653683004 653685023 653721018 653752003 618590004 653370020 653420020 653673006 653676004 653683005 653685024 653721037 653752004 626230025 653370021 65342U021 653674001 653676005 653683006 653685025 653721059 653752005 626230025 653370022 65367t001 653674002 653676006 653683007 653685026 653722024 653752006 626230025 653370023 653671002 653674003 653677001 653683008 653685027 653722043 653752007 653250005 853370024 653671003 653674004 fi53677002 653683009 653685028 fi53722062 653752008 653250006 653380001 653671004 653674005 653677003 65368301� 653685029 653730001 653752009 653250007 653380002 653671005 653674006 653677004 653683011 653685030 653730002 653752010 653250014 653380003 653671006 653674008 653677005 653683012 653685031 653730003 653752011 653250015 653380004 653671007 653674009 653677006 653684001 653690012 653730004 653752012 653250d16 653380005 653671008 653674010 653677007 653684002 653690013 653730005 653752013 653250017 653380006 fi53S710a9 653674011 65367T00$ 653684003 653690015 653730806 653752014 653250018 653380019 65367101Q 653674012 6536$1001 653684004 653690016 653730007 fi53752015 65325Q019 65338G"J2C? 6§3fi720�J1 653674013 653681002 653684Q05 653�90017 653730008 653752016 653250020 653380021 653672002 653674014 653681003 653684006 653690018 65373Q009 653760001 653250021 653380022 653672003 653674015 653681004 653684007 653690019 653730010 653760002 653260005 653380025 65367200d 653675001 653681D05 653684008 653710001 653730011 653760003 653260018 653390031 653672005 653fi75002 653681006 653684009 653710002 653730012 653760004 653260018 fi53390032 653672006 653675003 65368100� 653684010 653710Q03 653730013 653760005 653260U21 653390033 653672007 653675004 653681008 653685001 653710004 653730014 653760006 653260022 653390034 653672008.653675�05 653681009 653685002 653710005 653740001 653760007 653260023 653390049 653672009 653675006 653681010 653685003 653710006 65374d002 653760008 653260024 653390056 653672010 653675007 653681011 653685004 653710007 653740003 653760009 653260025 653390057 653672011 653875008 653681012 633685005 853710008 653751001 653760010 653260028 65339QQ58 653672012 653675009 653682081 653685006 653710009 653751002 653760011 653260029 653390060 653672013 653675010 653682002 653685007 6�3710�10 653751003 653760012 653260030 6533�JOOG1 653672014 553675011 653682003 653685008 653710011 653751004 653760013 653280024 653400030 653672015 653675012 653682004 653685009 6537200()4 653751005 653760014 653280029 653400031 653672016 653675013 653682005 653685010 653720005 653751006 653760015 653370002 653400032 653672017 653675014 553682006 653685011 653720009 653751007 653760016 653370003i653400033 653672018 653675015 653682007 653685012�653720010 653751008 653760017 553370004 653400034 653672019 653575016 5536820Q8 653685013 653720011 653751009 653760018 653370005 653400037 653672020 653675017 653682009 653685014 653720012 653751010 653410025 653370006 653400038 653fi72021 653675018 653682010 653685015 65372�0013 653751011 653420010 653370007 653400041 6536�2022 653675019 653682011 653685016 653720014 653751012 653676002 653370008 653410013 653673001 653875020 653682012 653685017 653720015 653751013 653685021 fi5337�0'i5 6534'IOU72 653673UO2 653675021 653683001 65368501$ 653720016 653751014 653685022 653370017 653410U23 653673003 653675022 653683002 653685019 653720017 6537510'!5 653752001 653370018 653410024 653673004 653676Q01 653683003 653685020 653720018 653751016 653752002 f � � ATTACHMENT 14 MtNUTES ADJOURNED JOINT MEETtNG OF THE PALM DESERT CITY COUNClL AND PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JULY 31, 2002 � C. CITY CLERK/AGENCY SECRETARY None D. MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCiVAGENCY BClARD 1. Counciiman/Member Spiegel reported that there would be a meeting at tf�e Riverside County O�ce af Education, 47-336 Oasis Strest, Indio, at 6:30 p,m. tonight regarding the school district boundary transfer issue between Dese�t Sands Ur�ifled School District and Pa1m Springs Unified School District for territory in the northem part of the City. He went an to say #hat there were �ine criteria �equired for approval of a boundary change. and according to the report prepared by Caldweil, Ftores, Winter, Inc., seven of the nine were met. The two not met were ftnancial elements that inv�lved Desert Sands arrd not Palm Springs Unified Schooi District (PSUSO). He said ACM Justin McCarthy woutd speak to thase twa items at tonight's meeting, indicating tfiat #here was passibly some info�mation that the consultants didn't have when their report was written, as it could be shawn that Desert Sands is not hu�t by the transfer. Counciiman/Mernber Spiegel said that with regard ta the City of Rancha Mirage and the letters received from them, he said Rancho Mirage was contacted same four weeks ago offering that he and Mr. Ortega would talk ta thelr Counci( to -- explain Palm Dese�t's position. However, no acc�ptance of the offer was received. Consequently, Rancho Mirage had no backgmund when they wrote their letter, nor did they have the infortnatiQn from the consultant's report. At this week's Battle Ak Bighom event, he'd spoken with Rancho Mirage's City Manager, who agreed that they had been at fault. Further, he said Peter Salomon, wha is developing homes west of Monterey Avenue r�ear the intersection of Gerald Ford and Monterey, is one of the biggesi opponents to the transfer; no oiher developers have come to the City of Palm Desert to ask for this transfer of land. He stated that those who have oome to the City are present residents of Palm Desert that want to be part of Desert Sands so their children can attend Palrr� Desert schools. Further, he commented that the figures reflect that Palm Desert is not a°cash cow' far PSUSD and not the answer to their problems (e.g. avercrowding, with the recent $52 rnilllon bond issue not nearly enough io address the needs). Councilmen/Members Crites a�d Ferguson, at�d Mayor Pro-TempareNice Chair Benson a�rmed they would attend tanight's meeting. Councilman/Member Spiegei went on to say tF�at he'd asked the City Manager's �ffice to prepare a letter for his signature, �ndicating Palm Desert's displeasure with Rancho Mirage's resolution ar�d the fact that they were affered a presentation but did nat receive it. He felt that after they'd heard from Pelm Desert, they could have taken whatever position they wanted, Further, he bel[eved the partnership the cities enjoyed as members of the Cvve Communities should have provided for a little more understanding. `r 4 MINUTES ADJOURNED JOINT MEETlNG O� THE PALM DESERT CITY COUNCtL AND I PALM DESERT REDEVELAPMENT AGENCY JULY 31, zooz Mr. Ortega added that he and the City Attomey had just been reviewing several letters sent to the City by ti�e at#orneys representing PSUSD. The Cfty Attomey would provide a pasition letter that wiA be handed to the Committee tanight along with the City's testimony on the twofinanciat points. Me cornmented that PSUSD's attarney wanted the City ta be the lead agency an CEQA (Califomia Enviranmental Quality Act) for the property transfer, which the City Attomey had a{so researched and woufd be drafting a lette� to be submitted o� that issue. CauncilmanlMember Spiegel said that interested residents had been contacted, and same of their fetters had been �eceived by the City Manager's Office for de{ivery at tonight's meeiing. tt was anticipated thai a substantial tur�aut of residents with chitdren 1rom the contested area would attend as weH. ;, 2. CauncilmanlMember Spiegel nated that the Council had unanimausly appraved the Amold Schwarzenegger proposal for an after school referendum/bond issue, and it would be on the November 2002 ballot. Therefore, he'd asked Mrs. Giiligan Ea draft a letter to the edifor, outlining Patm Desert's suppart of the AfEsr Schaol monies since approvat was already given far use of the Middle Schao! and Llncoln Elementary facilities for such programs. 3. CouncilmanJMember Crites said at the League af Calffamia Cities Conference he'd f ust attendeti� emphasis was placed on the need for cities to have established �"'� emergency management procedures in cases where bath the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem we�e absent from the City. Therefore, he fett the C'sty Manager should be affrciaffy apprised ofi the City Councii chain oi command in such cases. He advised that it would folJow the narmal rotatbn pattem, which p�esentiy wouid iist Councilman/Member Spiegel as the first person to cantact if MayoriChairman Kelly and Mayor Pro Te�ce Chai� Ber�san were not available, followed by CouncilmantMember Crites, then CouncilmaNMember Ferguson. 4. CauncilmanlMember Crites asked foc an �tem to be added to the Agenda, concerning a request to add more students to Palm Qeserfs youth delegatton attending the upcoming League of Califomia Ci#es Annual Conference in Long Beach {n October. CouncilmanlMember Cri#es moved to, by Minute Mot'r+on, add this item to tne Agenda. Motian was seconded by CouncilmaNMember Spiegel and caRied by 4-0 vote, witl� Mayar/Chairman Kelly ABSENT. CouncifmaniMember Crites said that at the Leagus's recent conference, he and Cauncilman/Member Spiegel attended a presentaiion on involving high school students/yauth in League activi#ies, especially the Annuaf Meeting. He said r�eports fram all the varlous entities seemed fo indicate that if it was limited to one or two studenis, it was very likely that one of them would cancel due to other school-related ac#ivities; and it amounted ta a better expetience when there was a detegaUon of three to six students. Therefore, staff was advised that the request -- for additianal students wouid be forthcoming. 5 ATTACHMENT 15a RE30LUTION NO. -?�� -76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COiJNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIR]►GE, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE TR11N3FER �F LAND, APPRORSI�►TEI,Y 2,200 ACRES BORDBRED BY INTERSTATS 10, MDNT�R�Y ]►VENU� AND FRANlC SINATRA DRIVE, FR�t T8E PALM 5PRZNGS UNIFIBD SCHOOL DISTRICT TO TSE DESERT SANDS UNiFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT �RF.1�iS, irs Jaauary 2001, a c2�u�q� ia tho laMs of tha Stat� of California providod for a city to diractly petitian for tha raorqu�izatioa of school district botsrzdari�s asid tho City of Palm Dosort did :ubmit aucii a p�titioa �o ths Rivorsid� Couaty Committo� oa School Diatrict Orqarsization, r�qaoatiaq th� trar�afar of land frosn the Palm Sprinqs Unifi�d School Diatzict ("PSUSD") to th� D�s�rt Sarids Unified School District �"DSLJSD") ; ar►d � WSEREl�iS, tho land to bQ trsasf�rr�d ia in tho main undQvoloped except for a limitad aumbar of d+��11inQ us�its and the California Ststa Univoraity campus nox urid�r cor►struction; arid WE�REAS, th� PSUSD has provid�d firiaricially for the conatruction of na.. �acilitias, includinq a K throuqh B�'' qradr achool arid a hiqh schoo2, throuqh tha approval of votors to issus bonds; and WHEREAS, tho City of Palm Dasort did Mork coop�ratively xith the PSUSD to soloct pot�atial auitable sit�a ior the location og th� aoN faciliti�a, plarinod to rQli�w cro�4d conditioris at other faciliti�s af PSU3D in th� ahort tarm and to provid� �nhu�cad opporturiitiss in tho lonq-tarm to �coommodata future qroxtii in Rasicho Mira9�; and wBEREAS, thia l�nd souqht to b� transferrad has boan in tho PSUSD sinca 1948, wh�n th� district Mas astablish�d, �vhich prodatos tho ir�corporation of tha City of Palm D�sart in 1973, ar�d Mas a fact ]cao�m to tho public and upoa Mhich tla� pvblic has roli�d in aaking dociaions, auch aa parQnts purchasinq a homa in a particular school district that haa proparod long ranqo facility and capital fiaancinQ plans; and WH�RBAS, tho Board of Dir�ctors of ths PSUSD has oppoaed th� tranafar of lsnd from tti�ir diatrict to anothar, as snch a traasfar �rould xorsus ov�rcroNd�d conditions Por a loaqor poriod of tima at N�lli• Coffman and Js�m�s Work�n middlo schools �d Cathodxal City Hiqh Sehool, xork to th� d�trim�nt of futur� rosid�nts of FSUSD by causinq a loss of $38 million ia r�valop�nt funds and aQCQssitatiaq considoratioa of an additional bond isauanco to rQplacQ tis�sQ loat rodQvolo�ont funda; aad WHERE�►S, th� tra�nsfQr of land fro� tho PSVSD affacts manY �xPa►Y�s � rosid�n�s, par�nts and studants ia th� City of Raricho Mir�ge, toqothar pith tha valus of thoir roal proportios purchasad and o�+n�d, ba�sed upon tha boundariss of the achool districts upon �rhich thoy raliod; aad W�IS, mariy local jurisdictions hav� b�rs vary succossfully s�rvod by mor� than one school district �vithout any datrimant to thQ commuriity of int�raat of thoao juriadictions. Now, TgEaEg'CRE 8E ZT R�SOLV�D by tho City Council of thQ City of Rancho Miraqo, California as folloxs: 1. Th� City of Rarsciso Miraq� opposos the trarssfer of approximateiy 2,200 acr�s of lasd frc� th� Balm Sprinqs Unifi�d School District to tha Doa�rt Sands Unifiod 3ciiool District for tho raaaoas stut�d abovo. 2. Tha City of Rancho Miraq� rocognizas that the Board of Diractora of th� Palm Spririgs Unifi�d School District opposes th� trausafor a�nd thia board is supportod in this poaitioa by the City of Rancho Miraqo. PASSBD, APP1tOVED AND ADOPTED T8I3 18th DAY OF July , 2002 CITY COiJNCI F T8E CITY OF O 1rIIRAGE ATTE5T: \ /. �lYqfni D . y ,Daputy City C1Qrk` Cc'.��i � i _� a_ � �� � Y .' 1 J ✓ �� � �Y ' Shaxn M. Mason City Attornoy ATTACHMENT 15b � CITY OF RAnC�I ,O �IIRAGE � _v_ � � � STAFF REPORT � DA7E: July 18, 2002 � \- I Ta FR0�1. S134)ECT� City Council / \/ COl1nCIL DISTRICi'� Ali Cathy Mitton, �,� Director of Management Services Opposing Transfer of Land from Palm Springs Unified School District to Desert Sands Unified School District SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECO�If�EIYDATIOiY, Consideration of Resolution No. opposing the transfer of land, estimated at approximately 2,200 acres bounded by I-10, Monterey Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive, from the Palm Springs Unified School District to the Desert Sands Unified School District. DACKGROUnD, In 3anuary 2001, a change in state law provided for cities to directly petition for reorganization of school district boundaries. Shortly thereafter, the City of Palm Desert submitted such a petition to the Riverside County Committee on School District Organization. Palm Desert has requested the transfer of about 2,200 acres, a triangular-shaped area bounded by I-10, Monterey Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive, from the Palm 5prings Unified School District (PSUSD) to the Deser� Sands Unified School District {DSUSD). This area is by and large undeve�oped with some residences in place and the California State University Campus now under construction. On February 20, 2002, the County Cammittee on School District Organization (Committee) conducted a hearing to review Palm Desert's petition; the Committee preliminarily determined that the petition met the nine criteria prescribed by the state's Education Code. Sriefly, these criteria are: l.Number of enrolled pupils will be adequate for each district. 2. Each district is organized on the basis of substantial community identity. City Council Action: Approved as Requested: Approved as Amended: Denied: Other: J Referred to: For: Cont. to Agenda of: Hearing Set: AGENDA ITEM �/ DATE: 3uly 18, 2002 � � Page 2 of 3 Opposing Transfer of Land from Palm Springs Unified 5chool District to Desert Sands Unified School District .� housing costs. 8. Reorganization is not primarily designed to result in a increase in property values causing financial advantage owners because territory was transferred. 9. Reorganization will not cause a substantial negativ fiscal management or fiscal status of proposed or districts. 3. Property and facilities of the original districts will be equitably divided. 4. Reorganization will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation. 5. Reorganization will not result in any substantial increase in costs to state. 6. Reorganization will not significantly disrupt educatianal programs and will continue to promote sound education performance in districts. 7. Reorganization will not result in a significant increase in school significant ta property � effect an established The State Board of Education is also authorized to adopt other criteria by regulation, which the Board has done in order to clarify those above. Attached following Resolution No. , please finc3 Section 35753(a) of the Education Code, which sets forth the nine criteria, and � Section 18573 of TITLE 5, Education, Division 1, State Department of Education, Chap�er 20, State Board of Education Procedures, Subchapter 4, Procedures Relating to Hearinqs on Proposals and Petitions for the Reorganization of School Districts, of the California Code of Regulations. The additional criteria for reorganizing school districts are found in this section, as promulgated by the State Board of Education. � The Palm 5prings Unified School District has opposed the transfer of the 2,200 acres, which has been in the district since 1948, when the district was established. In November 2000, voters in the PSUSD approved a bond measure that included the construction of two new schools to be built in this 2,200-acre area, a kindergarten through 8th grade school and a high school. The City of Palm Desert assisted PSUSD in identifying two potential sites for these new school campuses. The District indicates that these schools are needed to alleviate overcrowded conditions at Nellie Coffman and James Workman middle schools and Cathedral City High School. Retaining this land is crucial to serve future residents of the surrounding area as well, including Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms and Palm Desert. PSUSD estimates that the transfer of the land out of the district means a loss of $ 38 million in redevelopment funds, impacting construction of Phase One of the new high AGENDA 1TEM �/- �- DATE: July 18, 2002 � � Page 3 of 3 Opposing Transfer of Land from Palm Springs Unified School District to Deserc Sands Unified School District � school. Another bond issue would have to be pZaced befare the voters to replace the zedevelopment funds for the project to proceed. The Riverside Board of Education has commissioned an independent consultant to prepare a report on the impacts of transferrinq land from the Palm Springs Unified School District to the Desert Sands Unified School District. This report will evaluate conformity with statutory and regulatory requirements that must be satisfied. There are very defined formulas and methods to determine if the criteria are met in order to approve the transfer of land from one district to another. The report is scheduled for completion in mid-July. The County Committee on School District Organization has set July 31, 2002, as the fina� public hearing on the matter. At the Special Council meeting of July 2, 2002, a resident of Victoria Falls spoke during Citizen's Comments in opposition to the transfer, asking that the Council consider the matter. Residents of Victoria Falls have contacted Mayor Gerber and staff to ask for information and indicate their opposition. Councilmember Meepos has been contacted numerous times as well, since Victoria Fa11s is located in District 3. Given the level of community interest and expressed opposition, staff was asked to place the matter on the agenda and to prepare a resolution � of opposition for consideration. STAFF COMMEnT, In several discussions with Dr. Wil�iam Riedrich, the 5uperintendent of PSUSD, he has indicated that the City's ability to influence the decision of the Committee is very limitea, if any exists. Many of the criteria are determined satisfied through formulas or other methods set forth by law or regulation. Dr. Diedrich suggested that the City Council might wish ta weigh this limited ability against the long-term relationship and many projects shared with the City of Palm Desert. � AGENDA ITEM c��",3 � � L �sor.v�rzaN xo. - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITX COUNCIL �F THE CZTY OF RANCH� MIRAGE, C�►.LIFQRNIA, OPPOSING THE TRANSFER OF LAND, APPROXI1�iTELY 2,200 ACRES HaRDERED SY INTERSTATE 10 , MO2I'I'EREY AVENUE AND FiZANK SINA.TRA DRIVE , FROM TFIE PALM SPRINGS UNZFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO THE DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT WIiEREAS, in Ja.nuary 200I, a change in the laws of the State oi Caiifcrnia provided for a city to directly petition far the reorganization of school distriCt boundaries and the City of Palm Desert did suba�it such a petition ta thQ Riverside County Comiaittee on Schoal District Organization, requesting the transfer of las�d from the Palm Springs Unif,ied School District ("P3USD") to the Desert Sands Uni£ied Schocl District {"DSUSD") ; artd WHEREAS, the land to be trar�sferred is in the main zandeveloped except for a limited number of dmellinq units and the Caiifornia State University c�mpus aow under construction; and WHEREA.S, the PSUSD has provided finan�ially for the construct.icn of new facilities, inaluding a R through $`'�' grade school and a high school, through the approval of voters to issue bond9; and WHEREAS, the City o£ Palm Desert did work cooperatively with the � PSUSD to select potential suitable sites for the location of the new facilities, planned to rolieve crowded conditions at othor facilities of PSUSD in the short term and to provida enhancQd opportuni.tias in tha Zong-term to accammodate future growth in Ranciio Mirage; and WHEREAS, this land souqht to be transferred has been �n the PSU5D since 1948, whQn the district was establ.ished, which predates the incorporation of the City af Pa1m Desest in 1973, and was a fact knowsi to the public and uppn which the public has relied in makinq decisians, such as parents purcha,sing a home in a particular sahooi district that has prepared lor�g range facili.ty asad capital £i.nancinq plasis ; and WFiEREAS, the Haard of Directors of the PSUSD has opposed the transfer of land frora their district to another, as such a transfer aould worsen overcravaded conditions for a longQr period of time at Nelli.� Coffman arid James Warkman middle schools and Cathedral Ci�y Hi,gh School, work to �hQ detriment of future residents of PSUSD by causing a loss of $38 million in redevelopment funds and necessitating consideration of an additional bond issuarsce to replace thase lost redevelopmant funds; and WHEREAS, the transfer of land from the PSUSD affects many taxpayers, residents, parents and studerits ia the City af Ranaho Miraqe, together with the value of their real properties purchased a�nd ovmed, based upon the boundaries of the schaoZ districts upon which they relied; and WHEREAS, many local jurisdi�tioas have been very succ�ssfully sorved � by more thari one school district without any detriment to ti�e comm�unity of interest of those jurisdictions. � I• � � � NOW, TH�REFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the .City COuncil af the City of Rancho Mirage, California as follaws: l. The City of Rar�cho Mirage opposes the trasisfer of approximately 2,200 acres af land from the Palm Springs Unified School District to Yhe Desert Sands Uni£ied School D.istrict for the reaaoris stated abave. 2. The City of Raacho Mirage recoqr�izes that the Boa�d of Directors of the Pa3m Springs Unified School Diatrict opposes the transfer and this board is supported i.n tisis position by the City of Ra.ncho Mirage . PASSED, APPROVED AND AL?OPTED THIS DAY OF , 2002 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE By: � Harvey R. Gerber ATTEST: Joni D. Almy Deputy City Clerk APPROVEb AS TO FORM: Shawn M. Mason City Attorney � �1_�� CA Cadesledc;35750-35768) � �,� �J `� � http:/iwwtiv.leginfo.cago�'/cgi-bin/disp�dcb:.grauFr=_ 5001-36000cEtilr=_ �"SO.:;-oS EDUCATION CODE SECTION 35750-35768 35�50. The State Baard of Education shall estabiish minimum standards which it shall apply in approving or disapproving petitions and proposals for the formation or reoraanization of school districts. 35�5�. Wnen =t is necessary fo� the State Board of Education to consider petitions submitted under this chapter and prepare a proposal relating to such a petition, each county superintendent of schools and every other county officer in the counties affected, and the district superintendent of the school districts affected shall provide tne statistical information required by the Department of Education to complete the study. 35752. Wnen a petition for reorganization of a district is received in the offzce of the secretary of the State Board of Education, tne secretary shall se� the petition for hearing at a regular or special meeting of the board. At Ieast 30 days prior to the date of the hearing, he or she shall send by registered mail a notice containing a general statement of the purpose of the petition and the time and place of the hearing to each of the following persons or agencies: (a) The governing board and district superintendent of each school district whose boundaries would be affecced. {b) The county superintendent and county committee of each county which has jurisdiction over any of the districts whose boundaries would be afiected. (c) T:�e persons designated in the peticion as "chief petitioners." 35753. (a) The State Board of Education may approve proposals for the reorganization of districts, if the board has determined, with 1'25TJEC� to the proposa� and the resul�ing districts, that all of the follow�ng conditions are substantialiy met: (1) The r.ew districts will be adequate in terms of number of pupils enrolled. �2; The distric�s are eacn organized on the basis of a substantial community zdentity. (3) The proposal wiZl result in an equitable division of property anc �acz�ities of the original district or districts. (9) The reorganization of the districts wili not promote racia3 or ethnic discrimination or seqregation. (5) The proposed reorganization will not result in any substantial increase in costs to the state. (e) The proposed reorganization will not significantly disrupt the educationai programs in the proposed districts and distric�s affected by the proposed reorganization and will continue to promote sound education performance in those districts. (7) Tne proposed reorganization will not result in a significant increase in school housing costs. (8) The proposed reorganization is not primarily designed to result in a significant increase in property values causing financial aavantage to prooerty owners because territory was transferred from one school district to an adjoining district. .� �/� � 1 of 5 7/8/Q2 8:1 S AM CA Codes(edc:35750-35768} � http:/hi���+.feginfo.ca.gotilcgi-birU'disp�dcd:grou�?5001-=600U�lfile=?Si5t1-?5"ai+ (Q} The proposed reorganizatian w_11 no� cause a substantial negative e`�ec� on the fiscai manaaemen� o� f�SCa_' status o: the � proposed d:strict o� any exis`ing distr�ct ar*ected by the proposed reo�aanization. (1Q) Any otner criteria as tne board may�, b�• regulation, prescribe. (b) The State Soard of Education may approve a proposal ior the reorganization of school districts if the boazd determines that it is not practical or possible to apply the criteria of this section literally, and that the circumstances with respect to the proposais provide an exceptional situation sufficient to justify approva� ci the proposals. 35754. After affording interested persons an opportunity to preser,t their views on the petition and after hearing any findings and recommendations of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, the State Board of Education sha11 approve or disapprove the formation of the proposed new district. If the board approves the formation, it may amend or include in the proposaZ any of the appropriate �rovisi.ons o# Article 3(commencing with Section 35730). � 35755. After the State Board of Education has approved the plans anc recommendations tor the urtification or other reorganization of the school districts in any area, the secretary of the State Board of Education shall give notice of the approval to the county superintendent of schools having jurisdiction over any of the districts whose poundaries or status would be affected by the reorgar:ization as proposed. 35�56. T�te county superintendent of schools, within 35 days after receiving the notification provided by Section 35755, shall call an elec�io.^., in tne manner prescribed in Part 4(commencing with Section 5000), to be conducted at the next avai?able regular election, in tne territory of distr�cts as determined by the State Board of �ducation. 35756-5. In the case of the trans�er of territory from one district to ar.other, if the transfer is opposed by the governing boards of one or more o£ the districts a`fected with an average daily attendance of 9�0 or less, the territory in wnich the election is held snal� include the entire territory of the districts opposing the transfer. Each district with an average daily attendance of 900 or less wnich �s included in an eiection because of the objection of its governing boar;: *o the transfer shall bear che acfditional cost of holdina the election ir. that portion o€ its territory not otherwise included in the election. When a majority of the votes cast in the school district opposing the transfer and a majority of the votes cast in the entire territory in wi�ich the election is held are in favor of the reorganization, the proposal carries. � 3575'J. Tne county superintendent of schools sha11 prepare a s�a�ement of o�ficial information and statistics relating to the praposed reorganization which shal? include, but is not limited to, the plans and recommendations, the revenue limit per pupil, the rate of growth, the expected enrollment, and the support from the state �/- 7 2 of � 7/8/02 8:18 AM CA Codes fedc:35750-357681 � hcrp:�/www.leginfa.caeo�•/cgi-birudis�dc�Ggroup= �SU01-=6000�fi1e=; 5�50.: �'oF whicn ca^ be eYpected ��f sucr area maintai^s an adeauate scncol ^rogram. 5u�;: sta�is�ics shaii be based uper• �he school yea= ias= � compie�ed be�ore the date o� �he �1ec�ion. 35�58. Tr:e county superintendent of schools calling the election shall cause to be prepared and distributed a statement setting �orth arguments for and against the recommendations. The art}ument sl�all not exceed 500 words. The argument in favor of the recommendatior. shall pe prepared by the president of the county board or by a proponent of the recommendations designated by the president. The a:guments aqainst the recommendations shall be prepared by a member oz the county board who voted against tFte recommendations, or, i_ tnere be none, by an elector designated by the county superin�ender.� of schools who has appeared before the board or at a public hea�ing in opposition to the recommendation. 35759. T_he cost of preparation and distribution of the statement setting fortn tne arguments in favor of, and those opposed to, the recommendations of the county board, and the cost of any election heid pursuant to this article shall be a charge against the general fund of the county. If such district is situated in more than one county, the cost of the election shall be prorated against each county in the same proportion as the assessed valuation of the terricory of the proposed new district Iying ir. such county bears tc the total assessed valuation of the proposed new districts. � 35760. (a) Any circular, pamphlet, letter, poster, or other campaign literature which is designed to promote either the passage or defeai of a ballot measure proposing ths reorganization of school districts sha?1 bear on its face, in a conspicuous place, either ot the following: (1) Tne names and residence addresses of the chairmen and secretary, or the names and resicience addresses of at least two ofFicers of the organization issuing it, if issued by an organization. (2) The name and residence address, with the street and number, if any, of any individual responsible ior it, iF issued by an indiviuual or individuals. {b) I� any person eligible to vote upon such b�llot measure has reason to believe that se:ch campaign literature contains false and misleading statements, he or she may bring an action in the superior cour� ior injunctive relief against further circulation or the �i�erature, and if the court f.�nds that tne l.iterature does, in fact, ccntain �alse ana misleading statements, it may enjoir any further circulation of the literature. 357E1. Every qualified elector residing within the territory in whicn the eiection is caJ.led shall be eligible to vote at such e?ection. 35762. The words to appear upon the ballots used for voting upor. :he adontion or rejection of the proposais for the reorganization of � school dist�icts shall be "Reorganization of school districts--Yes," and "Reorganizatior. of school districts--No," or words of similar import. If the plans ana recommendations include a proposal for trustee areas in accordance with Section 35739, such proposal snall �/ � be considered a part of the reorganization proposition to be voted � 3of5 718/028:t8AM CACodesledc:35750-35768) � http:/!www.leginfo.caco�rcgi-binidis�dc�group=_SOt1i-�6060KFIe-��'Sc}_::-hg upor., �n� tne ballot sna11 incl�de wording to �hat effect. � kF � .7S7O.S. �J.^.GP. tne completion of th= canvass of Lhe e�ec�io^ �e�urns an� tne absentee ba�lots, the county superintendent o` sc7oels shGi_ tabulate such returns and the absentee ballots, and notify the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the board of supervisors and the governing board of each affected schoal district of the numbe= o� votes cast for, and the number of votes cast against, the reorganization of school districts in each school district and alsc the total nucr�er of votes cast for, and the total number of votes cast against, tne reorganization of school districts. 35764. When a majority of all the votes cast are �ast in favor of the reorganization or other proposal, the proposal carries. 35765. After tne board of supervisors receives a proper certificate of election or o�her praper evidence that an action to organize or reorganize schooi dzstricts has been approved as provided by law, the board of suqervisors shall make an order to create, change, or te_-mir,zte school districts as may be required by the action and estanlisn or reestab�ish the boundaries of the districts affe�ted by �ne action. The order sha11 be entered in the county's record of school districts. If tne action resultis in the creation of a district or a change of district boundaries of the type described in Section 54900 of the Governmezt Code, the order of the board of supervisors shall include the legal description of each district created or Changed in the action and, immediately after making the order, the board of supervisors shall caGse a copy of the order and a map or plat indicating the boundaries established or reestablished for each d;s�rict affected by the orcier to be filed as required by Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 59900} o` Part 1 of Division 2, Title 5 of the Gcvernmen� Code. 3576n". After the expiration of one year from the date of the order, �ne order sha�I be conclusive evidence that the schoo3 district has been legally organized, or the boundaries iegally changed, as the case may be, and no sui� shall be maintained which questions the validity of the organization or change of boundaries. 35767. Except as otherwise pro�Tided in Article i(commencing with SEction 35100) of Chapter 2 of Part 21, and notwithstanding the provisions of Section 35101, the county superintendent of schools naving jurisdiction may consolidate the election for the purpose of elec:ing the governing board of a unified school district proposed to be formed under Chapter 2{commencing with Section 92001 of Part 3 with Che election held for adopting or rejecting the plans and recommendations tor the formation of a new district. The election shall be called, held, and conducted pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 500Q} of Chapter 1 of Part 4, Chapter 3 (commencinq wztr Section 5300} of Part 9, and Article 1(commencing with Section 35100J of Chapter 2 of Part 23, except that the question o= formation of a unified school district and any other proposition to be voted upon shall appear on the ballot befare the list of candidates for eiectian to the governing board of the proposed �1_ 4 of 5 7/8/02 8:18 AM CA Codes(edc:35750-35768} � http:/hvww.leginfo.ca.govicgi-bin�disF�dcS,:group=�5001-;b0008fi1r=�>?�li•; �7ht� ur�fied distYic;,. � 3576�. T�e S�ate Bo3rd of �ducacion :ray aaop� r�?es a�d requla�icr.s for the implemen�ation of this article, as i� deer�s necessary. � � �/�/ � 5 of5 �/8/02 8:18 A M Document � hnp:/recr.oal.cagn�•icgi-binrom_isa�i....Q�` �&softpa�e=Docurnenta'_�t�='__��—t���.�-_ -�; T1TLE 5. Educatfon, . . . _ . _ ...� . . - � . - „� :. � . -. . . . _ � � � '��"'.Division t. State De�artrrsnt of Education, � �. .�. ' � : : - - � � _ =: Chaflter 20. State Board of Education Procedures, . = ' � - �� � - . � 5ubchaoter 4. Procedures Relatinq !o Hearinqs on Proposafs and Petitions for the ReorpantzatioR � " • r � &1�571. Arauments Befare the Board fOric�inal Submissionl. � �: .: �� ": � - -.; ;�. - . - - _ :...; . . - - - - . :: ,. _ ,.. _ _ - - �HISTORY; , - _ r�,-...� . - _ � . . . . - _ . 4�1�)�'�"-!�. _ . _' � ' . . . . . _ _ • .. �. . . . ._ ' ' _ _ ' _ . . . . . � I i �`��� 7\ T I. New tVotE filed 12-14-83; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 83. No. 51). 3. Amendment of seciion and Note filed 3-29-96; operative 4-28-96 (Register 96, No. 13). �18572. Resubmissions and Petitions for Reconsideration. — -- ---...- --- �-- -------- ---- --------_. - - ---�--- --__ ---------- ..._ � • Nc,te • Hist�r�' , . _. ..��,Y.-.-• -' -_ ..-.. -n.-�.T;..y--T-=`-.-r_r..-`•.:�.�'Ta�is-�.-.ec..�ss�r•,r.-- •ri.:.�i:[•s�r—.-+�eR�•...' � (a} At any time following a decisian by the Board on a proposal, petition or appeal, the original petitioner, county eommittee on school district organization, or any affected school district may resubmit the same or essentially identical proposal, or may petition the Board for reconsideration of the Board's decision. (b) Any resubmission or petition for reconsideration shall be accompanied by ne�r� ar�uments or new facts not previously presented to the Boazd. (c) No resubmission or petition for reconsideration shail be acted upon by the Board with respect to any reorganization praposal that has been called for election pursuant to Education Code section 35710.51 or 35756. \ci�� Authorin� cited: Section 33031, 35712 and 35768, Education Code. Reference: Sections 35707, 35708, 357i0-357I 1, 35752 and 35756, Education Code. f I IS�[�� >I�l� 1. New Note filed 12-14-83; effective ihirtieth day thereafter (Register 83. No. 51). 2. Amendment of section heading, repeaier of section and new section, and arr►eRdment of Note filed 3-29-96; operacive 4-28-96 (Register 96, No. 13}. §18573. Criteria for Reorganization of School Districts. � � • �t)l� • �-�I`l�ti-� L._J (a} The analysis of the proposal or petition by the California Department of Education shatl state findings of fact and recommendations as to whether each district affected by the proposed reorganization substantial]y meets the foIlowing criteria and standards: (1) It is the intent of the State Board that direct service districts not be created which will become more dependent upon county offices of education and state support unless unusual circumstances exist. Therefore, each district affected must be adequate in terms of numbers of pupils, in that: (A} Each such district should have the following projected enroliment on the date that the proposal becomes effective or any new district becomes effective for all purposes: �/+�/ 1 of 3 '7/8lU2 9:38 AM Documenl � http:iiccr.oaLca.go��rcgi-biruom isapi....U•�j�:sohpaer=lluc:umcnt32��=����=10��-r:= Elementar}� District 90I � Hi�h School District 30] Unified District 1,541 (B) The analysis shall state whether the projected enroilment of each affected district ��ill increase or deciine and the extent thereof. {2) To determine whether the new district is organized on the basis of substantial communih� identity, the following criteria should be considered: (A) Isolation. (B) Geography. (C} Distance between social centers. {D} Distance between schoal centers. (E) Topography. (F) Weather. , (G) Community, schoot, and social ties and other circumstances peculiar to the area. (3) ?o determine whether an equitabie division of property and faciiities will occur, the California Department of Education wilj determine which of the criteria authorized in Education Code Section 3�736 shall be appiied. It shall also ascertain that the affected districts and the count�� office of education are prepared to appoint the committee described in Education Code section 35565 to settle � disputes arising from such division of property. (4) To determine whether the new districts will promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation, the effects of the following factors will be considered: (A) The current number and percentage of pupils in each racial and ethnic group in the affected districts and schools in the affected districts, compared with the number and percentage of pupils in each racial and ethnic graup in the affected districts and schools in the affected districts if the proposal or petition were approved. (B) The trends and rates of present and possible future growth or change in the total population in the districts affected, in each racial and etlinic group within the total district, and in each school, of the affected districts. (C) The school board policies regazding rnethods of preventing racial and ethnic segregation in the affected districts and the effect of the proposal or petitian on any desegregation plan or program of the affected districts, whether voluntary or court ordered. designed to prevent or to alleviate raciai or ethnic discrimination or segregation. (D) The effect of factors such as distance between schools and attendance centers, terrain, and geographic features that may involve safety hazards to pupils, capacity of schools, and related conditions ar circumstances that may have an effect on the feasibility of integration af the affected schools. (E) The effect of the proposal on the duty of the governing board of each of the affected districts to take steps, insofax as reasonahly feasible, to alleviate segregation of minority pupils in schools regardless of its cause. C_J o� �-/� 2 of 3 7/8/02 9:38 AM I Documens � http://ccr.oal.ca.go�•�cgi-birvom_isapi....0�}&softpaw.=Document�3���=�3n�=1Utl�= (5 j The proposal or petition shall not significantly adversely affect the educational programs of districts affected by the proposal or petition. In anal��zing the proposal or petition, the California � Department of Education shall describe the districtwide programs, and the school site programs, in schools not a part of the praposal or petition that �:ill be adverselj� affected b�• the proposal or petition. (b} The Board may waive the criteria specified in subsections (a)(1) through (a}{5) of this section and may approve a proposal or petition or decide an appeal under Education Code section 3�71Q.� or 35711 if the Board determines circumstances with respect to the praposal, petition or appeal provide a sufficient exceptional situation. \��li Authority cited: Sections 3303i, 35712, 35750 and 35768. Education Code. Reference: Section 35710.5, 3571 ] and 35753, Education Code; Crmvford v. Board of Education (1976) 17 CAL.3d 280; NA.4CP v. San Bernardrno Crn� Unified School Drstrict (197b) 17 CAL3d 311. lII�It11:1 � � � � � -�� 3 of3 7/8/02 9:3K AM ATTACHMENT 16 � � � CITY OF PALM DESERT City Manager's OfFce STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Palm Spring Un�ed School Districi Property Acquisition Report SUBMITTED BY: Carlos L. Ortega, City Manager DATE: CONTENTS: Discussion: February 13, 2002 1. PSUSD Projects in Design Summary 2. Propasi#ion 47 Analysis ��� Both the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) and the Pa1m Springs Un�ed School District (PSUSD) serve the public educational needs (K-12) of ti�e Ci#y of Palm Deser#. PSUSD boundaries encompass approximately 2200 acres located in the northern area of the City. On December 10, 2002, the City Manager and Community Development Director met wi#h PSUSD Superintendent Dr. Bi11 Diedrich and his staff. The purpose of this meeting was to discuss PSUSD's future property acquisition foc cons#ruction of K-12 schools within the City of Palm Desert. Dr. Diedrich indicated that PSUSD is planning to cons#ruct three schools within the City of Pa1m Desert's northem region, including an elementary, middle, and h�gh schooi. All these projects stil! require site acquisition. The budge# presented by PSUSD for these new facilities is as follows: Elementa�y School Middle School Hi�h School {Phase 1} TOTAL $11 million $21 mil�ion $4.7 miflion a36.7 mi[lian $6 million $11 million $4.7 million $21.7 million $5 million $10 million $90 mi�lion �26 million $22 miilion $42 million As indicated above, approximately finrenty five percent of new school funding is derived from potential Proposition 47 funds. The proposi#ion was approved by voters in November 2002 and authorizes the state to issue $13.05 billion o# ge�eral ob(igation bonds for construction and renovation of K-12 and higher education school facilities, with approximateiy $3.45 billion designated for new K-12 school construction projects. School districts would be required to pay for 50 percent of costs with local resources. G:1CItyMplStapF�an AryanlWad Da1aVlpenda ReportslPSUSD Repatdoc $11 million $30.4 million $11 million $94.4 MIlllorl � � � S#aff Report Palm Spring Unified School District Property Acquisition Report February 93, 203 Page 2 0# 2 As PSUSD indicated in numerous pubiic hearings last year, these schaols are not dependent on population growth in this mainly undeveloped area because of current overcrowding condition throughout their dist�ict. PSUSD officials further specified that their first prio�ity was to construct a K-8 scf�ool facility and their second priority was constructing the high school. They also stated tha# they are ready to move on bofh land acquisitions and are looking at an school/park site between two residential parcels, in the University Village Concept 5, for the K-8 school site. However, PSUSD has not indicated any additional progress or acquired any property as of the December 10, 2002, meeting. Site acquisition remains a priority as real estate costs continue to escalate in this region. Staff will update the City Council as progress is made in this matter. Submitted By: � � Carlos L. Orteg City Manager — CITY COUNCIL AC�'IOA�� ;PPROVED DEN'IFD { �C� TvED T� _ (?THFR��b���o+ticil��tMS 't'�'I� �G DATE �.��_ �p� -- ' �f�ivT: -- . . 3STAIN: -- - � ... ERIF�ED BY: �� �}� - - " riQinal on Fiie �.,�.�� �,_ �_�y Clerk's OtfiLc � tici��.s��, ay�,tiwora na�av�c�+da �s��susn �e.aa ATTACHMENT 17 City of Palm Desert/3.15.04 Comprehensive General Plan/Schools and Libraries Element Schools and Libraries Element VI-48 Program 3.B Encourage and/or require the use of design and development solutions that mitigate potential traffic and noise impacts on schools and libraries, including but not limited to fencing, turnouts and acoustical barriers. Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, School Districts Schedule: Ongoing Policy 4 As appropriate, the City shall pursue agreements with the school district(s) to assist in the purchase, lease or joint use of land and facilities for school and recreational purposes, and to provide the neighboring community with access to recreational facilities and open space during non-school hours. Policy 5 The City shall ensure that adequate library space, services, books and other resources are available to satisfy the literary, educational, social and cultural needs of its residents. Policy 6 Recognizing the importance of the library system for educational and cultural development within the community, the City shall explore the need for and feasibility of expanded library facilities and resources, including the potential and appropriateness of establishing satellite libraries. Program 6.A The City shall establish a committee comprised of education and library professionals, elected and appointed officials and City staff, and shall explore the possibility and appropriateness of providing additional library facilities, including possible satellite libraries. Responsible Party: Community Development Department, City Council, City/County Library System Schedule: 2003-04 Policy 7 The City shall encourage and support local higher education institutions that enhance general, career and vocational skills, employment opportunities and personal growth of residents of the community. Program 7.A Continue to encourage and work closely with COD, Chapman University, CSUSB, UCR and other institutions to offer a wide variety of quality undergraduate, graduate, certificate and vocational programs in the Coachella Valley, including those in areas of health care, tourism, land development, and design and fine arts. Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, Planning Commission, City Council, COD, Chapman University, CSUSB, UCR Schedule: Ongoing Policy 8 The City shall continue to explore and advocate any reasonable means by which the entire City may be placed within a single school district. City of Palm Desert/3.15.04 Comprehensive General Plan/Schools and Libraries Element Schools and Libraries Element VI-49 Program 8.A As part of its on-going effort to place the entire City within the boundaries of a single school district, the City shall coordinate with the two school districts and other interested parties to achieve this end. Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, PSUSD, DSUSD Schedule:Ongoing Policy 9 The City shall pro-actively work with the school districts serving the City to improve the level and quality of education whenever possible. Policy 10 The City shall cooperate with the various school districts serving the community to establish a "community education committee" to facilitate coordination and cooperation between these essential service providers. Program 10.A The City shall initiate contact with the various school districts serving the community, and will facilitate the establishment of a community education committee, which will develop a mission statement and process of committee activities. The committee's essential goal shall be to enhance the provision of quality education to all students in the City. Responsible Agency: Community Development Department, PSUSD, DSUSD, COD, CSUSB, UCR, Chapman College Schedule: 2003-04, Ongoing Policy 11 The City Library Committee shall continue to coordinate with College of the Desert, and shall explore additional cooperative efforts with other libraries, including those associated with CSUSB and UCR. Policy 12 The City shall pro-actively work with the school districts serving the City to improve the level and quality of education whenever possible. Policy 13 The City shall cooperate with the various school districts serving the community to establish a "community education committee" to facilitate coordination and cooperation between these essential service providers. Policy 14 The City shall coordinate and cooperate with the College of the Desert and other institutions with which it may share library facilities to establish similar and uniform hours and services that best address the needs of the public. ATTACHMENT 18 .. , . � � �A�� ��f�� o�' �tn ,-�, ���sc��� 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 July 22. 1988 , Mr. John L. Nelson Asslstant Superintendent Business Services Palm Springs Unified 5chool District 333 5outh Farrell Dr.tve Paim Springs, California 92262-7994 Dear Mr. Nelson: Subject: Cooperative Ac�reement fo� Proriect Area No, 2- Contract No. 00-276 At its regular meeting of Aprii 14, 1988, the Palm Desert City Council and the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency Board approved the subject agreement and authorized the Mayor and Chairman to execute same. Enclosed fo� your records is a fui ly executed copy of the aforementioned agreement. � If you have a�y questions or require any additionai.information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely. . SHEILA R. GILLIGAN CITY CLERK/SECRE7ARY.TO THE PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SRG:mpf Enclosure (as noted) cc: �vCarlos L. Ortega, RDA Executl�ve Dlrector �y-���-� � , . • `° �' AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATION AMONG � PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT THE CITY OF PALM DESERT AND THE PALM DESER� REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 'THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on the 14th day of April , 1988, by and between the PALM DESERT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (Agency}, the CITY OF PALM DESERT (City) and the PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (District). R E C I T A L S A. The City and Agency, by Ordinance No. 509, deted July 15, 1987, have pursuant to Californie Community Redevelopment Law (California Health and Sefety Code Sections 33000 et se�c.) adopted the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 2(hereinafter referred to as "the Plen). B. The City and Agency have found and declared that there exists within the boundaries of Redevelopment Project Area No. Z (hereinafter referred to as "the Project" or "the Project Area") b i i ghted ereas wh i ch are character i zed by one or more of those cond i t ions set forth i n Sect ions 3303 1 and 33032 of the Hea 1 th and Safety Code caus i ng a reduct i on of , or i ack of , proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical, social and economic burden on the community that cannot reasonabiy be expected to.be reversed 1 � � or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone; and for other reasons. C. The Pianning Commissio� of the City has revtewed the proposed Redevelopment Plan and has recommended its approvai. D. The District is a taxing agency.which may be affected by the adoption of the Redevelapment Plan and the allocation of tax increment revenues to the Agency pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670 (b). E. Health and Safety Code Section 33401 authorizes the Agency to enter into egreements to pay to any taxing agency Ntth territory loceted within the Palm Desert Redevelopment ProJect Area, other than the City, any amounts of money which in the Agency's determination are appropriate to alieviate any financial burden or detriment caused to the taxing agency by the Project. F. The District has advised the Agency of the potential financiai impact resulting from the edoption and implementetton of the Redevelopment Plan on the District. G. The parttes hereby ftnd that the Agency's implementation of the Redevelopment Plan wiil result in an lncreased need for certain district services in and around the project and that the plan for the Project Area may thereby cause e financtal burden and detriment to the District. H. The District and Agency wish to enter into an agreement to alleviate the financiel burden which may be caused to the District because of �edevelapment activities in the Redevelopment Project Area. 2 � � � I. The District and Agency further wish to enter into a cooperative agreement to provide mutual aid and sssistance in the redevelopment of the Palm Desert Redevelopment Project Area through the construction, operation and maintenance of certain facilities and im�srovements of benefit to the City, the Agency and the District. J. District and Agency recogni2e the need to provide adequate public school facilities to serve the project and thereby assist in eliminating blighting conditions. The parties have determined that such faeilities are of primary benefit ta the project and are within the boundaries served by the Distrfict and that redevelopment financing is the oniy means of financing all or a portion of the rehabilitation, construction and recons- truction of such public schooi facilities in conjunction with other availabie district financing. A G R E E M E N T NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and cavenants set forth herein, the parttes agree as follows: ' 1. Definition. The words and terms in this agreement shall have the following meanings: l.l "Agency" shall mean the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Palm Desert. 1.2 "Bonds" shail mean any bond,' note, interim certificate, debenture or other obligation issued by the Agency. 1.3 "C i ty" sha 1 1 mean the C i ty of Pa 1 m Desert , a 3 � municipai corporation. � 1.4 "D i str i ct" sha 1 1 mean the Pa 1 m Spr i ngs Un i f i ecf School District, a public agency. 1.5 "Fiscal Year" shall mean the period from July 1 to and including the following June 30. 1.6 "Indebtedness" shail mean any principal of and interest o� loans, monies advanced to, or other indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part. the imple- mentation of the Redevelopm�nt Plan. 1.7 "Ordinance" shall mean the Ordinance of the City adopting the Redevelopment Pian. 1.8 "Project" shall mean the Palm Desert Redevelopment Project Area. . 1.9 "Redeveloprnent Activities" shali mean those redevelopment activities set forth in the Redevelopment Plan, pursuant to Section 33678 of the Health and Safety Code. 1.10 "Redevelopment Plan" or "Plan" shall mean the plan prepared by the Agency and adopted by the City.Council far the Palrn Desert Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to Ordinance, as required by law. 1.11 "Redevelopment Projects" shall mean those projects identified in the Plan. 1.12 "Tax Revenues" shall be used herein when referring generally to both of the folioNing categories: 1.12.1 "Agency Tax Revenues" shall mean those 4 � � tex revenues which the District would be entitied to receive tn the absence of the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to 5ection 1(a) and Section 2 of Article XIIIA of the Californ#a Constitution and which are to be allocated and paid to the Agency purusuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33670 (b) and the provisions of the Redevelopment Pian. 1. 12.2 "D i str i ct Tax Revenues" she 1 1 mean those tax revenues which the District wouid be entitled to receive in the ebsence of the adoption of the Redevelopment Plen, pursuant to Sectian 1(b) and Section 4 of Article XIIIA of the California Health and Safety Code, all tax revenues pursuant to Section 33670 (b) of the California Heaith and Safety Code which are attributable to increases in the rate of tax 1 ev i ed by or for the benef i t of the Di str i ct, wh i ch 1 evy occurs in or after Fiscal Year 1986-87. 1.12.3 "Net increment Revenues" shall mean those finel revenues distributed to the Agency after the ailoca- tion of Section 33334.2 Funds. 1.13 "Palm Desert Redevelopment Project Area" shall mean the project area identified in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. Ailocation of Tax Revenues. Subject to the specific provisions of this agreement, the Agency shall allocate tax revenues each year as follows: 2.l All Agency tax revenues shall be ailoceted and paid as provided for in Section 3. 5 � � 2.2 Ail District tax revenues shall be paid directly to the District by the county officials responsibie for allocat- ing and payfng tax revenues. 2.3 Attached as Exhibit C is an example, for illustra- tion purposes only, of a typicai calculation releting to the allocation of tax revenues. 3. .Allocation of Aqencv Tax Revenues. Pursuant to the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan� the District, the Agency and the Ctty agree that the Agency tax revenues shall be alio- cated, peid and disbursed as foliows: 3.1 Palm Sprinas Unified School Oistrict Capital Fund. The Riverside County Auditor-Controller, or official responsibie for the distribution of texes, shall pay fifty percent (54x) of the Agency tax revenues in excess of the amount descr i bed i n Sect i an 3. 4 be low, to a trust fund to be administered by and for the exciusive benefit of the District or its nominee and ta be designated the "Palm Springs Unified School District Capitai Fund" (the "Fund") to finance the redevelopment projects provided for in Section 4 below. Payments made to this fund shall not be subject to the pravisions of Caiifornta Health and Safety Code Section 33334.2. District or nominee shall administer the monies deposited in the fund to finance projects as are provided for in Section 4 below. 3.2 Redevelopment Aqencv Fund. The balance of all , Agency tax revenues shall be allocated to the Redevelopment 6 � Agency. � 3.3 Alternate Fund. Agency tax revenues including interest accrued, otherwise required by this agreement to be paid to the Fund pursuant to Section 3.1 may be paid in whole ar in part to the Agency upon request of the Oistrict. Such funds including interest shall be allocated by Agency to a separete fund to be estabifshed, and shall be used to pay on behalf of the District the principal of and interest on loans, constructian projects, money advanced ta or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by Agency to finance or ref i nence i n who 1 e or i n part the projects set forth i � Sect i on 4 of this ag�eement. �� 3.4 The parties agree that no Agency or District tax � revenues shali be distributed to the Palm Springs Unified Schoal District Capital Fund untfl "net increment revenues" to the ; Agency from the Project Area are equa i to or 1 n excess �of th�ee j (3) miliion dollars in any tax year, exciuding amounts peid ta other taxing agencies pursuant to similar cooperative egreements f and any mon i es set as i de i nto the 1 ow and moderate 1 ncome housing fund of the Agency for the Project Area.. �,_J 4. FinancinQ District Pro.iects. The monies deposited in the Palm Springs Unified Schooi District Capital Fund and Alternate Fu�nd sheli be used to finance projects for the benefit of the District for the foilowing purposes. 4.1 Rehabilitation, construction or reconstruction of: a. Permanent or temporary ciassrooms� 7 � � b. Gyms, athletic or recreational facilities and pools c. Library. auditorium and school site administ- ratio� facilities d. District administrative offices, maintenance warehousing facilities e. On-site and off-site public imp�ovements such as, but not limited to, sidewalks, crosswaiks, lights, curbs, gutters and streets f. Landscaping, irrigation and 1lghting, and g. Other encillary facilities, equipment and furnishings appurtenant to a school ar district facility to make such facilities operable. 4.2 Acquisition of property for pubiic schooi facili- ties, district administrative and other support services. 4.3 Design, plenning, edministrative and engineering costs equai to not more than twenty percent (20�) of the acquisi- tion, rehabilitation, construction or reconstruction cost of the projects undertaken by the District. 5. Aaencv Obliqations Constitute Indebtedness. The District and Agency agree that the Agency's obligations here- u�der to make payments, construct improvements, or provide improvements or services to the Qistrict, constitute en indebted- ness of the Agency within the meaning of Health and Safety Code 8 � Section 33675. � 6. I�itiatina Meilo-Roos Communitv Facilities Districts. The City and Agency shall caoperate with the District in identi- fying appropriate slternative measures to finance needed school facilities in the City and in the Project Area. Such financing mechanisms shail include consideration of Mello-Roos Community Facility Districts or similar benefit assessment districts. 7. Aqreement Appiies to Amendments to the Redevelopment Plan. The terms of this Agreement shall apply to any subsequent arnendment to the Redevelopment Plan that would expand any contiguous or noncontiguous area, add additional erea to the Project Area or increase the debt limit of the Pian, as if this Agreement applied solely to such additional area. 8. Limitation on Pavments. Notwithstanding.eny other provisian of this Agreement ta the contrary, the amounts payabie to or for the benefit of the District for any singie year shall not exceed the amount of property tax revenues which would have been rece i ved by .the D i str i ct for such year i f a i l the property tax revenues from the Redevelopment Project had been allocated to all the affected taxing agencies without regerd to the division of taxes required by California Health and Safety Cocle Section 33670. 9. Findinqs bv the Citv Council of the Citv. The parties agree the City Council for the City has found and determined, in connection with the construction of any building facility, _ structure or other improvement, provided for in this Agreement, E � as foliows: � a. The improvements for which funds are used or allocated are of benefit to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Project Area. b. No other reasonable means of finsncing any of the improvements are avaiiabie to the District, City or Agency. 10. District. Aqencv and Citv Cooveration in Pro.iect Area Development 10.1 It fs the intent and desire of the District, Agency and City to expedite and faciiitete the implementation of eligible projects for the Project Area. and which benefit said Project and the goais and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. In accordance with their policies, rules and regulations, the District end Agency aill expend tax revenues as provlded for in. this agreement for the effective implementation of projects, programs and services of mutual benefit to the District, Agency and City consistent with the goals end objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. � 10.2 In generai, District, Agency and City agree to assist one another in the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan in accordance wtth applicable state and federal laws. The District, Agency and City sh�)1 supply to one another such information and reports as from time to time either may reason- ably require in order to undertake thefr respective obligations. 10.3 The Agency maintains a low and moderate income 10 �� � � housing fund in tMe amount af 20x of tax increment. Such funds are to be appropr i ated for projects wh i ch benef i t 1 ow and moderate income housing. The District provides educational services for low and moderate income students. Such services include, but are not lirnited to, providing free and reduced priced meais to students who quai ify because of low fami ly income. The District aiso pravides special educatton services for students from low and moderate income families. 10.3.1 From time to time, the District may submit to the Agency a request for expenditures by the Agency from its low and Moderate Housing Fund far certain projects related to public schoo 1 or educat f ona 1 fac i 1 i t i es wh i ch are to be 1 aNfui expenditures under California Health and Safety Code Sectian 33334.2. Upon receipt of any such request, together with such supporting documents as may be required by the Agency, including, without limitation, an opinion of counsel to the District and the Agency regarding the validity thereof, and .appropriete indemnification by the District for any expenditures Which the Agency may make pursuant to such request, the Agency shail give due consideration to such request. 11. Conditions Precedent 11.1 Any duty imposed on the Agency by this agreement is based upon the existence af Agency tax revenues sufficient ta allow Agency to perform as required herein. No representations ll � � or assurances are made by the Agency as to when, if ever, sufftcient tax revenues wiil be available for these purposes. 12. Condition Subse4uent. As a condition subsequent ta the parties' obligations herein, if any action is taken pursuant to California law Nhich resuits in terminating the Project Area or Redevelopment Plan, the parties shail have no further duties or obligations hereunder. 13. Financial Burden Aileviated. District agrees this agreement alleviates any financial burden or detriment which may be caused to the Dfstrict due to redevelopment activities in the Project Area. � 14. Leqal Challen4e. The District, Agency and City agree that in the event titigation is initiated by someone not a party to this agreement, atta�king the validity of ali or any portian of this agreement, ali parties shall support and seek to uphoid this agreement. 15. Litiqation Between Parties. If either party commences litigation against the other for the purpose of determining or enforcing its right hereunder, or for money damages for a breach hereof, or for other equitable rel ief related hereto, the prevailing party shali be entitied to receive from the losing party, attorneys' fees in an amou�t determined by the court, together with costs reasonably incurred in prosecuting or defending such action. 12 � � 16. General Provisions 16.1 Settlement. By this agreement, the parties intend to resolve any differences with respect to the Redevelop- ment P1an, and District agrees to forebear suit challenging the validity of the Redevelopoment Plan, the Project Area, the Environmental Impact Report in relation to the Project, or any related matters. 16.2 Effective Date and Term. This agreement shall become effective upon the date specified above upon which date the agreement was entered. 16.3 Term of Ac�reement; Amendment. This agreement sha11 remain in effect until a11 Agency debts are patd or untfl the limit for incurring indebtedness as stated in the Redevelop- ment expires, whichever event occurs last. l6.4 Severabilitv. Each paragraph and provision of this agreement is severabie from each other provision. and tf any provision or part hereof is declared invalid. the remaining provisions shall nevertheless remein in full force and effect. 13 � 16.5 Entire Aqreement. This agreement constitutes the entire, complete and finai expression of the agreement af the parties. Ai'TEST: �? PALM DESE�RT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY � �,�� � � � ,� � �LC��- � � �: / e Y : li,��./ Secretary % Ch rman � ATT ST: � , . ,� �--���' City Clerk ATTEST: CITY OF PALM OESERT B Y : ��,/ ".' N or PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRiCT 8Y: _1�\ o 1..�. 15oh1, �-- As i ant Superintendent Busi s Services Approved BOE 7/12/88 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE flmm�mnmm�nmimmmmmmmmmnnumouanmremurovumm�muuunuun� = 5 •� ,� OFFICIAL SfAI € = ` MARLENF, �;�,i1'�IN = = u m = _ .'� NOTARY PU�VC ' ; , � RIYERSIDE C"t�N7Y = ` CALG.'RHIA ` = `��,<o,,.,, _ = My Commission Ezo�res ]0 Apri� 1��9� = Atlt i1111 N1111Nr1111 i11N1111I xNenIN1UI�H��1lrvirvn���nI111�N�nimilMr(ta�lrl�nn111 �l1 �Hnl r111. ACNNOWLEDGMENT—General—WdGottS Form 233CA—Rev 5-82 01982 WOICOTTS, INC. ID�wecuss8�2� ss. On this 14th day of July , in the year 19 88, befote me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared John L. Nelson, Assistant Sut�erintendent, Business Services , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis oi satisfactory evidence) to be the person_ whose name_ i S subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me thai _he_ executed it. � WfTNESS my hand and official seal. `����..-�..� • . Notary Public in and for said State l4 _ , - . . � �. . ,;,:j .., Sj:. ... � '?,'. ' � i L��S"D11 � • +�r' .` 'T.,��L�'• ::',t �. �a � •� , � • ; i'� ` .�:.. \ ,•��r�f:ai'�}� ��1.. ��'��r_�,��t 1� i���.�' � •' �.; .�:• li. ♦• t'i .:�► ` r, w..� � 1. . � �v r-?�� ' 71. .. . : . .' �'.'� '• ••`r�w��4 i�;�.S :;� •.,:� . .;. . •,,,�;�,';;;;:,r„=?:i:—t ���� � .. � i � ..: i.r. U,n • _ ,:•,r -�""' ..: . � . �. ... : � '. : �� � , � .� � , �� . � ll�� �IY . Y Y i.� �� /I � '�!" �:iS'` t'�!'� '1i.�� ' �. �'��7 : . . ... ,.: �.�.j ' t�.... �e} ` f ' ' . ��' • ' � '� . .�.�ji"„"'��I..,....v.� : .;. � � apR�1��:.� �.N`Re� � ' '� � � ' �''� illit{I �.Illlt111:.,;� .,• . ;,E.�•,.:.� .,. , 1. . • . - . i, � .:., t ;_ r• .:.: : : . .,;t,• :..;�:.kRE!►•+c•.+ �;r . �4 .. . �"• • i�: ;.: ,-l:•r,v „:;.��i.•;+:�';, (•';• c -,, a: •N: .•..1.. ... �.Y' rX � rYt+.: r7b�••f "i't �,t�` • ' . . . '- . ^. .. , • .S::�t%'• ' ' .,. �� � •. � ' . . : � 't . .� .� ��. . _��', _�.\ . -� •�� � !- � ;�.' � . • ` ' , . _�• • ,i•� , •',•:•, ,s��• �' '•t• � � � � ,�". . ,.��: .1. •"..'. • ..,C•«:.....i; .�:��... . i �llii��i�N ?� •• �� ��,;... �, ,. •'-.,�w:� :,: _�» . f' .::�..,�...,; .� . � . , .. . .� � ; . �•':;�;;�; . . • :.. . .� , � ; � : _ .. ,. . � � . •'_� A; .� .• • ',; ' .. ' . . . . • ` " . . . � . • . . � �:F . . . .. � � � . , , . . ; . ..'.�. .. Li�►� � , • � . .. , ' �, �` J . • • . •.� �+'• '`, ' �;. ' . 1 t ' .. � .. ' � . ;��'! . . . .; • L,.�i�»..M, :. J 'r�IV . . . • ; .�.l.ni. ." � ',. :J ' » . .��. t�3..:. �i.,� ,�.. i• :I:� '� . . . ' �,;;iii'� t'�:r. 1.. � . . . . .. . � ' •' •: . ,,� ,�• Y��^' o}'}����� `��:� � \ ',s •�•i� •� ��'n�+�•'�'�: �i�.�.��i+7'Cl:�� �i 1 . ,. ,.` •' j� �y ' ., ' 'r. �'`. :x`' '� ' ... IS '.r`:,. a.�c�;t •' y.� � �4�'��'�.. ; � . ��� � ;� �_„ .•,.+•�ti� •.,� �:;�. :�.�� * ,.x.�� :+�c�� ��-�t�� � . . , �.` :..'_ :, . y.<: �.. ,.:.c "'l��+�;�" •.•1� � • • :r.�� . �:i: =�~� 4:?i�t� �k r �'.'a`;�Li�+�.t�'�r�• r � y ;�l.. � • ` e . �;{:� ` �• � ,"'r:;,��i;�'•:. • :.•: �5��+'� �•:�i ,rt,`, .,i.i�:.�*�� . '1��.'�iu'^_ y rr. . •? �.- ��;'�,� �.► '�, ' ��i� i. .. . �5:.'T���.J.. 'a�•..{l� '�%.u.14 .�:♦ �••af.1i+,.�� ?' . . . ,�; r•.''''. � j.. •�,,:. 'tt •� ..!�%�� �: i{.1�'•t�i� ' '�- :t•• '�i; � s..' �� ��� .i . �. �'.r. .iE� �'�}.� A �,�� ��'. , . � ��.J; �. � :��, .. i','•:�. • r..tt- '1. {�.tir�� �'•iw'•4 • �� , ' y�r '�tiY��� i �t ��.,:��{i�:� =.•���Y�� . .. . •. � � . -.`j' .\=,�, .�''..�:t.' ••�� ••'�_`ti �� � • � � �i'i�.����n �, • ...•' 5��.�i�L;.t�•,� :.`;�. ��. �, . •:i: .,t,. �+� ;'�. ��� ; ; �`�. t' I�!�.' 4� I`:. �...� �•�'. � R :. � . e '�.•� ��.41 • � '� ��t � � �i 'w . :�: �r.'�• ` ���r��� : •:.i'�?a,•��.. y.ti,;,x�� ► , ' fr, '.' �} ;i;!:t� A'%er �. .�.»�., � . � • •� .!i �' .��:�,.i. '•i jtf � . �r .. �(f � � ' . . '�. "�.''.:,.� - •�{�i�l.:�`����`;4s+` � ,'i:'�•7 1. »• �' ' , . �� y t�:.rff..� �. `�•.` :;,: �:. , .,•,' f . �,..�' �� .i t �,.�w •�: . i.; '.". .�'.; :1'' ;�.'1 / . , . ' �. ..•'-! t. �f. . �'�`'`�:•�,�,� _ . . �. i � � • , ' �. . �. f. . � .+i' ":f•�•i - ; 'Mt:� ,'j' �"j�; =s.'.,��. l � � . . . ; + �� �;. ;'`.':' . .�i:{� • ";.. _� �;;;`�;�.; . '` fww �� ,�1 ��� ' '!'� . , • ;,,,�;�.a..ur u - ; «, •' ��' � �3 .. 1 y •' 't �a ` • % �;�. ' � � � ;� , � y ., ` � ,.. „ �{'.. * �� � � 4 • • ,. `-�—� • . . � � ,t {{ � � .� � ,'6�P�i� �� `�5.�..�,..,,,,.�7� • ;' 1 .'i� :(f =����1 tt11.� —,-�,��'��'�►��`� � . , a . . ' � . • . . .. ••' i � � • • . ' �, t, � ' ,. . t �. 'f .�' '� . :�i t�• � ' � ' ,�, �_ � � � . -� � , . , . . , � ' . . � � . �� . ' � ' Y � � ..---_ .-- 1�. � � `\', "'' �� ' . , ,` ,` ,=�w;�L: r�^ . \` e �'� � � 1� �� . ,�_ .�. �1�..�.. c��►11 1 � . a�+�o • i e 5 � v.l� � � � ����.- �c�� .. - - ��as:; /%r�� . : � ,, , �..,�...� t.-s:`�`�„�;,,'n c;�.. s,�.---...- ':`: ;� �":"'.' .. ��; `� �� ��� � � '� � .�T --" ',�,�. r�`► � --.-- . .. �� � �sfr�� .'+ �s"cY . - �_t . � . � .. 1� % . .'� • i •S- - �. va.0 ( �� �,. S � , �-�! � � V.� � , �,,,,�,��. u'�,:'::.'�..i f.'" \ ; . . � r;,, ,���� 06�.... �r�c i►► , � . �, � (�Y�.� l�itt11t11ttU1 {t[i1 �1 � . .�� ..,��� � �� T: __ - <� �+4�p: _, .�.� — ----��� =$-i_�---+--;lr. G. .. k`'• ,..y'.' :,� .� ��� • , � �� �:►« �� . ,,.�.�. . �.; • . . .. • � �a� ue^�' ...._. �:st ► `,. _ ��11 .w.... t D�S� c�T� °F p ��M � EXHIHIT H PROJECT LIST � PROJECTS WILL HE ADDED TO FROM TIME TO TIME U � m _ x w � i � e II i i ; �� :� a �� � s �.=s �- -- -- s �� �1�i �i� �- -�-- ' '3s�,7R �8 : �¢I�.�r.�s ..� ���. �� i � �i �� �• ��� E� �; �� -�__� �A3��Al� =� �Ei���f��Ts �`d _.r «.r @�9���#"s /R #�i��# e"�€:��t �.iJ 1=�=_�_� »-��� �������g��� � tRi�f�x'�� _ ', - I � � � ������ ��. a���� j� '�-� _�- -�--�_ ���a�A���s�sa�s���a. �� issEqdr af��d��iib�� e ' I ( '1 ' • � '� - _ .. .�I .. ...d .. _ .. •������� s � i�x �Ki� - _�__�_ - -�:":: :�s��e9� ,� � f_�7f�#� --�- - -- �-- '- .:�:. .5�i���B� �,� �f������ _�_„ ,5 + --''�R iB r@=R'� �j� ;tiA 1.•.4'� L$�i'�A �= «�� I 5&��� S���E ��g ����� �� di _� $# �� '--- --- --- --�-_�:�.� � ��a� R ���� R+J �i a,�t 7� A �¢ �� SriE�i,�_ _ ----- ,i�_ x£�3�` _= -�-�---'-- ---- , - ��gxw _ -I---�-- �# ����" � � " �' ie'siiss'ssssiisi�i's' ssiiii �i ,�s �� _�#�l�i= si ��# ���-- -�--�--�-_ _� '��-.�e x= �xanxi����R� �5 ��# *a��x�������i+��i����.� '.—.'�? •w�.t.i J.i .:i . 2 I ap: ���=�k����Qs�=_�x 35 __���a�s�ga:���i�����=5a � � , I " ' '1�.i .ti I ..�_.. ^ ��rC��Z������ �R7���3 ��� ����3�x6�t��iF��E��� sxE •Jl.:.s.iJ.t1i=��'�i�T7G it�'.� ��-- `--a--a--.!- --- -- ' -�--- ai� ��������#���s�p,��3��g� �y_ ������i�i��i���i��xQ:a�:E l_ i J� �:A.l.i7 � I�IA�F =r��issaf�s��@'Y �;_ �+i6�� �i�aiR �i's,���si� : j3E�i��� ii�i��_�&i=���f�� • • •.:.i .t.o .�_.:.��_.�_... _. �. . .._......y a�55�3r S3 �i�i���z3�S�sS ��� ##�f� #� f����#�!# �'#� �� '�� ��€ #� �� '�� �� t�=�� �€ ���€� �� �� �� = '..�'.. {-= -=qs_ e�e � , A � T O Q ,.. O- r O � '' � o ip c � N .�. (n � m i0 N � N H°+ � � � �• A A A A A A A.P A A w W W W W w W W W W N n� N N N N N N N N��-+ -� -+ ��� W�� * �* �D 07 V O� C7� 11 W N� O l0 O� V O� ln ? W N� O l0 O� V O� Vt A W iV � O l0 O� V(T tn ? W N� O �D � j � -� D r c c � N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N��--� -+ ��� O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O�D �D �D �D �0 �0 W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O�D l0 �0 �O �O W T� � Vl ? W N� O�A � V O` (in �P W N� Q 1p N V O+ (!� �P W N� O�O W V O� ln A W N O �D � V O� (n O� �- W'v.J W W'vJ W W W N N N N N N N N N N�-� -+ -+ � �� � O O O O O Q O O O O�0 �D �D �O O� C�i y � �� V Q� ln J� W N� O�D N V(T Vi A W N� O �O W V C� �./� A W N-+ O �O Ca V Q� ln A W N� O �D CG V O� V'� — csf ', � �I W O i � G`�� ���� N O-I � N �� �� W W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N�� V A LJ N� O �D O� V O� Vl .A W N I�: --+ O l0 l0 O� V V C� A W N O lD W O�/tnR� W N-� O l0 l0 W V.:O��'.6� ln tn Oi '-' O �0 O O O O O O � N W cn O� Co C N tn V O w O� O w o� A O O� � J+ w V V V W�0 � N V; O W O w� �' D O V N W�� A�D V O� N N lD V V�D W t0 V V O� j v1 N O� O� O O� O�' cn �� cn W A O� ' O�.<cn V-+ � D�— G� V �O O� W Vi O� � Co V Co O w cn V O� N O� � w W N A O� tD W �0 �! N V A N O V O�D i.§ �Os Co V V N�� D V V O N O� O+ V O N Cn tn tn -� O+ V O� A-� A Co O A N A O`�D cn t0 w O � W V V-� tn V� tGF rn w �U Q V� 7 � ln A l0 V� N ln W O V N 6� N.P � l0 V O� V V� N Q� O� �D V W O� �� U� �N A O� N CO lll O k' O�'� A A W Q� � f1 N� � � Q O O V-+ ?� V O�D V W O�0 w O� �0 A�D O N A N O N V O� t0 �: t0 �0 � ln .A w �0 �D W�0'���� O-� �n �- �n ds En N ln O O� N N N N N N j ..N. j N N � � � � � � � � � � � � � � -• � V V A A W �'�' N N O O lD lD �D � N V V V O� T(n ? W N-+ O�0 N V Q� Cn Cn A W W N N� C �0 O� V N V W W W �0 cn O T N W A� V W lD O� N l0 O� A N� ��� N W cn V l0 N Vl M� U� O��D A A N O N W A O� O A t0 Cn N t0 � V V Co O N O� t0 A�D cn N W N t0 ? W V v, Q� N�?� O W �0 O� O�A. �- -' O 1p 1p N O� l0 N A A A N l0 A W �D Co �P �D O�0 ln C� V A� V N N O� W� l0 O� lD �� W V O� V1 N�(.l0 ,Q� O� �= J]. Q1 N Q A N^' 4D O� �O V O� O N N l0 -J Q� �P W-� V O W�O � N Vl ln W CO N Vl O� CO C+� O W N 00 l0` Q� W Q� � � O O O �� ���w ��� � V r��i W W O A rn i.Vi � A A a u�i V�� rn � e.l � O �� V vWi rn w O� V Nc A�0 y� v> , '� � I O� V W W V V�I V O� O� O� 6� O� O� O� O� Cn ln lJ� 11l Vl l.n lJ� Vt V1 A A A W W W N N N N���� � p� � tn A N� tD N V v� ? W N O�0 N V O� cn A N� O V W O V?� N �n W O Co Cn W� �0 V O+ �A �v �� V A V N V W �D cn N l0 Q� W� W O+ (n W N� O �0 �0 t0 N V A�-� � W Q� O cn N lD W V V l0 � A W N N o� �0 � cn �D o� o� o� A r.> cn O w w� Orn w n.� A V w � o� a� O w O v� W w�.n N� a� O v� o> � w w� V A OJ -� V lD lD W V1 l0 -' CO N-+ O� ? V W N W V N iD O� �P N O W O� W W V1 A O O O� N���O V�P A O� Q� ln rn � O � O ��w O O� w �0 p �0 t0 O�w �0 O� O V O� V W A O� O+ O O��v O� N� O� W O iD A N t�0 O� N W A� V V V V V CO W N N Co O� N O� O� O� W� l0 lD l0 l0 l0 N W V V V O� O� Vl (.!1 A W N� O l0 N O� �P N N cn o� V w cD O O � N w A in o� V�I o� iD O-• iv w O rn w �0 cn � rn � Orn O w cn v W V cn � vi s w? 0 0 0 0 0�o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� o o�o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d9 W N ? � O� � F d -3`�0 �, "s � v � A O N w <n W W N N N��-, O O O O�D l0 l0 l0 l0 N N O� O� V V O� O� O� ln l.n A A�A W W W W N N N N�� W O V A-' CO ln N l0 V���D V A N O O� � W� V N CO J O� N lD (Jt N l0 O� W O O] Vi G-' � N Q� � Q� j N�� W V1 V� V1 l0 V1 O V.P N O� W V� O� W W O� � V tn A A V1 O� N V W O V O� V� rn +� A i•.� co -+ .••• W-� -� w O �0 w A Q w O V Q � O Orn w o+ �0 V�D v, A�.n �D �.n W-� O O�0 N O� �(n N V�.D lrl W N O U'� C7� O fT W Q� N-+ Cn N O O�P W W T O� V Co O� O� W W�D tD W� O� �-, A W A V n. N A�-+ O+ V V V N W tn N tD O N O O N w O V N V W A V �O �O N O V V.P �O O A T� O O O N rn� tD N A.P OD A tD O N N N O O� W-+ O V O O � W.A w O� w-� N V N� Q OJ V A O W w.A w N N N N j j N N � � � � � _a � � � � _..� � � � � � � � ...� W v.l N N O O���� V V O� Q� O� Cn V1 A A W N N� O O�D W W V V O� V'1 l.n ln .A A W V-' 1�? N V� rn O �+ O:n O+.+� O vi � V n� a�P O rn r.� �0 u'i �! ���P V O w V cn O A �0 A O cn � V w�D V V l0 W O� A N� N ln �0 A O V Vt �A ? Vt V O�P � V'� O N V�A ? O� Co V W N V A W A O� O+ a� a W w rn n.� � W V W-+ O O Q� W�P cn rn? cn tn V O w rn rn W V O� �0 a� cn o� �0 -+ A cn cn W V o� V O O� -r N tn V Cn v� Cn � O O V iD A��O �n w�� N cn O� � tn �D ? N.P O w o+ O O� w N rn-` o� �n W N p N A V Q� �D Cn � O� ln: Cn V-+ N A N.P .P V A(n O� W ln cD V O ln lA '.n .P 'v'i CN N W� tn � O O O �0 O W��0 �0 N O-� W��-' �0 V N A W N O V�P �C V �0 V W� vi O W O V-� O� O �0 W N O� W O� C1y V V V O� fT N N U1 A A A W�N W N N N��-� O �O � V O'� Q� 'r A A W N N-+ -+ -� N W A O� N G. .la O V W O Q� W O O� W O V A-r N W tn V O W Oi O A W W O� A O V A N' O+ W N N W O+ `O N V N V`p O`G Q� U� ? A N��� C� V N� A'�.� N V T US V� V� 01 A V N j w j O+ w t0 -� O V O O V O �O A 7� Ca T CJ1 O V�O V1 W W A O'� � t'J V V Oi V O`J -� V O'l0 Oi V N �D O A 07 N U� Cn O O W V N V�O t0 Gn V V A� V V O ! CX� W W t0 tn W A Oa V �O V O O O O� �D V� Oi �O V�n O O� �D G� W O� W O Cn V� O� tn O C.n O� N W V V V Co40 -� �� O O Cn �O V� Q+' O O d4 W w N W N � � � w � ° � o n � � �, c=• � w w R. O � �� T� o �� °' N c o 3 " '�' � � p W S u+ - y /D : m � � � _ � � 7 v+ � N 3 � d rn O �� � � S Da ��m �c �, a. ;° �. w ��on N N' d�� cD S O m N d Z n � a m m, � cD O � "' a o n � { D 5 w =�' pw n � � I � � � a � s�$ N-a o rn a 00 A �'� � O� � y v�, r�D T r _� ��` � � A ro d� �, � w � y � 2 � �� �� � w � ~ A z "•I I � V�1 '�. I C N H� � F ln W '�I I O�,u O Vt C 3, D Vl DA ➢ ?o D o (�p °A' I� � N � � C n' < l- � N T a m �o c �" O � � D N Z A V D Do � ` � • ,,, � � � y � � w � '^ �p A 3�C m c�n -C W O � 1 � �, � w � n 3 z� � D � d -� - a� ;� < < ., y � �� a T DO N cA c-� �'~n � O O �D �0 j �D A y O N O� � � O� H A � V O� m N A W T >O N w y0� �cn m `-� O Co l0 (n l0 V A n G 7 a 0 ��.+ N � A � m 0 3 � t�j� O � O t/� O ' � � � � � n O �D� � 3 O o � N � �D y � � O � � � m� � � � O Cn �v s � O c�o''Q P� -• � �•ni, r. ro.�0 O �� Groi O � iT( � � � ? flw �. tD j C'O" O V1 �• � 7 N � � S � � S O O . p � S 0 � N n � /\ � �+. �1 S n1 � � � �,. = � ��� � n D 3 �. 3 a :• y C O � � H �W ui rr C � < o ,� `° o, 3 fA � W � S N � A � 0 O � ATTACHMENT 19 Palm Springs Unifierl School Dist��ict ANNUAL AN� FI VE —YEAR F EE REPOR T FOR THE 2018-2019 FISCAL YEAR It is a requirement of Government Code Sections 66006 and 66001 that school districts provide certain financial infonnation to the public each year. The report must be made available for public review 180 days after the close of the previous fiscal year. Developer fees are intended to be used for the construction and reconstruction (modernization) of school facilities to accommodate students from new development. Developer fees are not intended for general revenue purposes. 1. THE DISTRICT PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IN COMPLIANCE WIT�I GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66006 FOR THE 2018- 2019 FISCAL YEAR A. Statutory Schoal Facilities Fees {Government Code Section 6b066(b}{1){B} July 1, 2018 — June 30, 20i9 Level 1 Residential Level 1 Commercial / Industrial $ 3.79 per square foot $ 0.61 per square foot B. A1�IOUNT OF DEVELOPER FEES The fee amounts reported were authorized by the District's Board of Education. The fees partially mitigate the itnpact caused by new residential and commercial construction and do not adequately fund the District's school facility needs. Amount of Fees Collected $3,496,745.03 Refunds of Prior Years Expenditures - $0.00 Total Revenues Amount of Interest Earned $435,747.26 $3,932,492.29 Page 1 C. BEGINNING AND ENDING BALANCE OF ACCOUNT Beginning Balance (7/1/18) Ending Balance (6/30/19) Fees $18,361,434.34 $20,597,961.22 D. FEES V4'ERE EXPENDED FOR T�IE FOLLOWING PROJECTS IN FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 Palm Springs Unified School District ITEMIZED FEE EXPENDITURES 2018-19 Project Description Adininistrative and Planning Costs Legal Fees for Developer Fees collections and Projects SFNA and Developer Fees Study Growth Impact Studies DSA Close-outs Desert Hot Springs H.S. CTE - Building Desert Hot Springs H.S. 4 Portable Classrooms Total Expense Percent�ge Funded �vith Fees l00% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Amount $200,192.21 $754.00 $8,677.50 $38,400.00 $37,452.31 $524,831.39 $885,658.00 $1,695,965.41 Page 2 E. DURTNG THE 2019-2020 FISCAL YEAR THE DISTRICT WILL COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION ON T�iE FOLLOWING PROJECTS IF SUFFICIENT FUNDS ARE COLLECTED Pro,ject � Estimated/Actual Commencement Date DHSHS Additional Classrooms - Growth � 2019 DHSHS CTE Academy � 2020 The District has determined that funds are not sufficient to fund the following projects but anticipate the commencement on the following projects at a future date. Project Desert Hot Springs New Elementary School F. THE DISTRICT HAS TRANSFERRED OR MADE LOANS FROM THE ACCOUNT AS NOTED (If not applicable, do state N/A) Description of Interfund Transfer or Loan N/A Funds to Which Reportable Fees Are Loaned N/A Amount Date Loan Rate of Repaid Interest Page 3 II. PROJECTS PROPOSED IN T��E NEXT FIVE YEARS FOR WHICH FEES WILL BE EXPENDED A. The fees are collected on new residential and commercial development within the District to fund school facilities required to serve students generated by new development. The fees will be used to fund construction and reconstruc#ion (modernization) of school facilities and provide interiin housing as necessary. B. RELATIONS�IIP BETWEEN FEES COLLECTED AND PURPOSE FOR WHICH THEY ARE COLLECTED There is a reasonable relationship between fees cl�arged and the need for construction and reco�lstruction (modernization) of school facilities. The School District does not have adcquate facilities to accominodate students from new developinent. The fees collected do not cxceed the cost of providing adequate school facilities. C. SOURCES QF FUNDING Source of Funding 1. State Funding Program Funds 2. State Hardship Fu�lds 3. Community Facilities Districts 4. General Obligation Bond Proceeds Amount of Funding Anticipated to be Received to Complete Financing of School Facilities �2,608,891 �0.00 $0.00 5. Redevelopment Pass-Through Agrcements 6. Statutory School Facility Fees Level I 7. Alternative School Facility Fees Level II 8. Mitigation Payments 9. Certificates of Participation 10. SB-201 Fees 11. Total Funding (Anticipated) �25,000,000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $27,608,891 Page 4 Palm Springs Unified School District TO BE COMPLETED IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS PROJECT NAME: Desert Hot Springs 4-Portables Classrooms Total Cost of Project: $1,250,000.00 Previously expensed: $524,831.39 Source of Funds l. Developer Fees Estimated Rennaining Cost of Pro,ject $364,342 Anticipated Date to Commence Pro,ject In progress PROJECT NAME: Desert Hot Springs High School CTE Building Total Cost of Praject: $10,500,000.00 Previously expensed: $885,658.OQ Source of Funds 1. Developer Fees 2. State Funding Estimated Remaining Cost of Project $7,005,451 $2,608,891 PROJECT NAME: Desert Hot Spcings New Eleinentary School Total Cost of Project: 45,000,000.00 Source of Funds 1. Developer Fees 2. Bond Funds Estimated Remaining Cost of Project $20,044,000 $25,000,000 PROJECT NAME: Rancho Mirage High School Outdoor Laboratory Total Cost of Project: 1,000,000.00 Source of Funds 1. Developer Fees Estimated Remaining Cost of Project $1,000,000 Anticipated Date to Commence Pro.j ect In progress In progress Anticipated Date to Commence Pro,ject 2022 2022 Anticipated Date to Commence Project 2020 Page S ONGOING COST C��ARGED TO DEVELOPER FEES Estimated Cost of Project Administrative Costs at 3% SFNA & Growth Studies Other Fees Total ongoing costs $1,350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $1,900,000 Anticipated Date to Commence Project 2020-2025 2020-2025 2020-2025 2020-2025 D. SUMNIARY OF ANTICIPATED REVENUE AND PROJECT COSTS Total Funds Needed (Add total of projects to be completed in next five years Total Anticipated Funds (Line 11 of Funding Sources) Fund Balance as of 6130119 Shortfall Page 6 $57,878,684 $27,608,891 �20,597,961 $ 9,671,382 ATTACHMENT 20 MS 1Long-Range Master Plan 2019-2029 Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro 2 Prepared for: Palm Springs Unified School District Prepared by:PBK Architects,Inc. 2855 East Guasti Road, Suite 402 Ontario, California 91761 PBK.com ©2019 by PBK Architects,Inc. All rights reserved, Published 2019 Printed in the United States of America No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means or stored in a database or retrieval system without prior written permission from Palm Springs Unified School District. Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro 3 DRAFT This Long-Range Facilities Master Plan is 90% complete and is pending final District approval. Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro 4 Page intentionally left blank. Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro 5 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District 2019-2029 Long-Range Facilities Master Plan www.planPSUSD.org Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro 6 Page intentionally left blank. INTRODUCTION1 INTRODUCTION1 Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro7 Section 1: Introduction Tab 1 Acknowledgements Intro 8 Introduction Intro 10 Background Intro 11 Objective Intro 12 Section 2: Long-Range Facilities Master Plans Tab 2 Overview LRFMP 1-5 Section 2.1: Cathedral City High School Boundary Tab 2.1 Cathedral City High CCHS 1-12 Nellie N. Coffman Middle NCMS 1-10 Agua Caliente Elementary ACES 1-10 Cathedral City Elementary CCES 1-10 Rio Vista Elementary RVES 1-10 Section 2.2: Desert Hot Springs High School Boundary Tab 2.2 Desert Hot Springs High DHSHS 1-12 Desert Springs Middle DSMS 1-10 Painted Hills Middle PHMS 1-10 Bella Vista Elementary BVES 1-10 Bubbling Wells Elementary BWES 1-10 Cabot Yerxa Elementary CYES 1-10 Julius Corsini Elementary JCES 1-10 Two Bunch Palms Elementary TBPES 1-12 Section 2.3: Palm Springs High School Boundary Tab 2.3 Palm Springs High PSHS 1-10 Raymond Cree Middle RCMS 1-10 Cahuilla Elementary CES 1-10 Cielo Vista Elementary CVCS 1-12 Katherine Finchy Elementary KFES 1-10 Vista Del Monte Elementary VDMES 1-10 Section 2.4: Rancho Mirage High School Boundary Tab 2.4 Rancho Mirage High RMHS 1-10 James Workman Middle JWMS 1-10 Della S. Lindley Elementary DLES 1-10 Landau Elementary LES 1-10 Rancho Mirage Elementary RMES 1-10 Sunny Sands Elementary SSES 1-10 Section 2.5: Alternative School Group Tab 2.5 Desert Learning Academy DLA 1-10 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center EWEC 1-10 Mt. San Jacinto High MSJHS 1-10 Section 3: Long-Range Facilities Master Plans - Financial Summary Tab 3 Financial Summary Introduction FS 1-9 PSUSD Long-Range Facilities Master Plan-Financial Summary FS 10-70 NOTE: school sites have been arranged per high school boundary Table of Contents Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro 8 Preface Acknowledgements On behalf of our partners,principals and staff,we wish to express our sincere appreciation to the Palm Springs Unified School District for the opportunity to assist in the development of the Long-Range Facilities Master Plan (2019-2029).We also extend our utmost gratitude to the Palm Springs Unified School District Board of Education,Superintendent,Senior Administrators,School Principals,Teachers,Staff,and school community representatives that actively participated in planning sessions;assisted with data collection and review;and provided District and facility-specific information,insight,expertise and vision.Their commitment and contributions were invaluable and significantly contributed to the successful development of the Long-Range Facilities Master Plan. Pavan Bhatia Director of Planning Marco Eacrett Partner, AIA, LEED AP Zelia de Sousa Client Executive Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro 9 Leadership Board of Education Richard Clapp,President John Gerardi,Clerk Madonna Gerrell,Member Karen Cornett,Member Timothy S.Wood,Member Administration Sandra Lyon,Ed.D,Superintendent Brian J.Murray,Ed.D.,Assistant Superintendent,Business Services Michael Swize,Ed.D.,Assistant Superintendent,Educational Services Tony Signoret,Ed.D.,Assistant Superintendent,Human Resources Facilities Planning Julie Arthur,Executive Director of Planning and Development Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro 10 Introduction Palm Springs Unified School District is committed to providing safe and well-maintained school facilities with optimal learning environments in support of its academic mission.In keeping with this commitment,Palm Springs Unified School District launched a long-range facility master planning initiative in 2017 in order to accomplish the following goals and objectives: 1.Assess and prioritize current and future facility needs. 2.Identify associated costs to modernize,renovate and/or add facilities. 3.Bring technology infrastructure to current standards. 4.Transform current learning spaces to better meet the needs of future learners. The Palm Springs Unified School District Board of Education engaged the architectural team of PBK to conduct a facility needs assessment (FNA)and assist in the development of the comprehensive Long-Range Facility Master Plan (LRFMP). The project began in 2017 and in the process of drafting the Long-Range Facilities Master Planning documents through 2018.The Long-Range Facilities Master Plan report,is being drafted by PBK in collaboration with and on behalf of District administrators and community members.The information provided within the contents of this report include introductory details about the District including current District profile along with key facts,figures, mission and goals. An overview of the data and findings related to each phase,as the cumulative outcomes and results stemming from each phase of the project contributed to the development of the current Draft of the facility master plan. The Draft plan represents hundreds of hours of data gathering,validation and prioritization involving a variety of facility stakeholders including District administrators and department-heads,school principals,instructional staff, community representatives as well as multiple architects,engineers,planners and constructors. Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro 11 . Background Palm Springs Unified School District The Palm Springs Unified School District,or PSUSD,is one of three public education governing bodies in the Coachella Valley desert region of Southern California.PSUSD governs the western half of the valley;the Coachella Valley Unified School District and Desert Sands Unified School District oversee communities in the eastern half. Administrative offices are located in Palm Springs.The PSUSD was established in 1958 from the Palm Springs Public Schools,later included Palm Springs High School in the 1960s. Summary More than 2000 administrators,certificated staff and classified staff.More than 23,000 students are enrolled in sixteen elementary schools,four middle schools,four high schools and a continuation high school.Preschools, Head Start programs and adult education are covered as well The District covers the following communities: Cathedral City Desert Hot Springs Palm Desert Palm Springs Rancho Mirage Thousand Palms Unincorporated areas within the region are covered as well. . Historical Development and Present District Status The Palm Springs School District has been in operation for well over 100 years.When Riverside County was organized in 1893,the Desert School District was already serving the Palm Springs Area and had an average Daily attendance of nine students.The Desert School District,along with the Edom School District which was created out of territory of the Indio School District in 1927,provided elementary school (grades K- 8)access.In 1940 the Palm Springs Union High School District was created from the Banning Union High School District and served the Edom and Desert School Districts with an average daily attendance of 157 for the 1940-1941 school year.¹ In 1948 the Edom School District was annexed to the Desert School District,which resulted in the creation of the Palm Springs Unified School District on July 1,1948.The new District covered approximately 507 square miles and in 1964 had a population of around 28,000.Today the Palm Springs Unified School District serves a population of 168,000.² Source: 1. Melbo, Irving R. Report of the Survey –Palm Springs Unified School District. May 1964. Palm Springs Unified School District. 2. U.S. Census Bureau, 2017 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Intro 12 . . Objective Long-Range Facilities Master Plan (2019-2029) Palms Springs Unified School District has developed a Master Plan for all school sites in order to modernize and potentially construct additional new modern facilities. Our process included input from Parents, Students, School Administrators, Teachers, and other Community Stakeholders. This effort helped us plan for the future of PSUSD schools for the next 10 years and beyond. The PSUSD Facilities Master Plan has been developed over a multi-year process to create a strategic road map and phasing plan for projects identified for future funding for every site. The Master Plan is a dynamic long-term planning document that provides a conceptual layout to guide future growth and development. Our detailed process has included analysis, recommendations, and proposals for a site’s academic needs, population, facilities, land use, and more. The PSUSD Facilities Master Plan has incorporated public input, surveys, planning initiatives, existing development, physical characteristics, to support the educational vision, mission, and goals. Though our collaborate process our objective has been met and as a result we have developed a Long-Range Master Plan for PSUSD that consists of: •A future vision and guide for each PSUSD School Site. •A plan for PSUSD community’s physical evolution. •A comprehensive understanding of conditions, needs, as we move into the future at PSUSD Schools. •A road map for managing growth and change of facilities while providing for orderly and predictable development for PSUSD Schools. •Setting priorities for developing and maintaining infrastructure at existing PSUSD Schools. •Creating a framework for future policy decisions for PSUSD Schools. LONG RANGE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN2 LONG RANGE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN2 LRFMP 1Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 2019-2029 Long-Range Facilities Master Plan LRFMP 2Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Overview: Whether engaged in small-scale classroom remodeling or large-scale school planning,effective designs are based on a clear sense of learners’ needs and educational goals.Physical spaces have an enormous impact on learners’ experiences.Building layouts can create opportunities for new relationships among students,staff,and the community.Furniture arrangements in classrooms and hallways can foster planned collaboration and spontaneous informal learning among students.Day-lighting, learning commons, and natural materials can create a sense of place and connection. Focusing on emerging trends shaping today and tomorrow’s educational environments such as ubiquitous technologies, personalized learning, sustainable construction, and collaboration,we can better address the needs of our schools. Objectives Develop a master plan and strategies for environments that serve the needs and goals for stakeholders in your community. Understand key principles of 21st-century pedagogy and design. Develop user-centered design that can be applied to learning environments, whether small scale or large-scale building projects. Address latest insights on topics such as learning theory, collaborative learning, student and community engagement,social media technologies, and environmental sustainability. To build or renovate a school or building in the 21st century is no easy feat. When you consider that many schools were built decades ago, educators and architects are often challenged with the task of designing spaces where learning is flexible and meet the needs of today’s and tomorrow’s digital children. The 21st Century Learning Environment: High schools are thought of as collections of classrooms and administrative areas, but it is essential to define learning environments as both physical and virtual,and encompassing the different contexts and cultures in which students learn.Schools need to be creating much more varied flexible learning environments —spaces where students are proactively learning and not just passively receiving information. The demands of our global and technology-focused economy is leading schools to place increased emphasis on students being creators of their own knowledge.In addition to delivering content in more traditional ways,many schools are experimenting with problem-based learning where kids work on projects that have authentic contexts,often within their communities.Schools are increasingly taking advantage of learning opportunities that extend beyond the classroom and school walls. Establishing Priorities The Long-Range Facilities Master Plan documents provide the road map for facility improvements that will support the community.The Facilities Master Plan will be revisited as the initial projects are implemented and as the future unfolds to guide the community on the path toward educational excellence and 21st Century leading environments.Stakeholders, the District,and the community have identified their priorities for application of resources to facilities for the future.At the top of the list are: A safe and secure environment for all students. Forward looking facilities for all arts, sciences and technology. Modern technology infrastructure. Support an expanded curriculum including athletics. Enhance and maintain the quality of the general campus facilities. Facilities that support a culturally rich experience. Facilities that strengthen the bond between campus and community. Facilities that support academic rigor while teaching to each student’s strengths. Communication, Collaboration,and Creativity: Varied spaces:schools should have flexible classrooms,small group meeting rooms,large group gathering spaces,and nooks for students to work independently. 1.Neighborhoods:create areas where teams of teachers and students are co-located to encourage collaborative,cross-disciplinary learning. 2.Strong technology infrastructure,along with venues for students to work independently and in small groups using technology. 3.Transparency:make the learning culture of the school highly visible and palpable.Open up views to and from classrooms,labs,offices,and meeting rooms. 4.Exhibit space to curate and display student work throughout the building. To create personalized experiences for students,we need to help them connect to the building and the people inside it.Some low-or no-budget ways to do this would be to: Create or define a common area that is the intellectual hub of the school.Design a welcoming entry experience that tells a story about your school’s values and mission and gives a sense of how to move around the building.Allow students and teachers to transform their school environment.Ideas include public art projects, murals, or curating exhibitions. Encourage community access after hours.Communities want to see schools as resources: a place to use a gym,a gathering space, or a venue for adult education. Promote transparency by uncovering windows into classrooms and offices, and consider leaving classroom doors open. Change out classroom furniture when possible.Test different furniture types and configurations for flexibility and comfort. Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Overview LRFMP 3Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Overview Key Improvement Areas: Improve safety and security.The security of school campuses is essential to creating a successful learning environment, and is a high priority of parents and teachers.District schools have a variety of security needs to support controlled access and supervision of schools and students.Proposed projects include fencing, reconfigured school entrances,installing security cameras and monitoring systems,as well as up-to-date alarms and internal communication systems. Upgrading classroom instructional technology and network infrastructure. Schools are looking for ways to incorporate modern instructional technology to prepare students for 21st century college and careers.In order to accomplish this, sites must have better technology and network infrastructure to keep up with rising academic standards and technological innovation. A potential bond would include a Technology Endowment Fund to support the installation, maintenance and upgrades of network infrastructure and classroom technology for the next twenty years regardless of changes in State educational funding. Completing needed modernization, maintenance and repairs at aging schools to provide safe and well-maintained classrooms and schools.Projects may include the repair/replacement of electrical and plumbing infrastructure roofing, HVAC systems,lighting, cabinetry, windows and flooring.Proposed improvements will provide our students with safe and up to-date classrooms. Upgrading science, mathematics and career preparation labs.Along with basic technology infrastructure,in order to prepare students for good paying jobs in growing fields like engineering and biotech, schools need to adapt classrooms for more hands-on science,mathematics and collaborative learning.High schools are in need of developing specialized instructional classrooms to support career technical education in fields like computers/networks, automobile technology, culinary arts and medical technology. The need to prioritize what is important rather than simply urgent, improves maximum effectiveness. A facility inventory was performed to evaluate the intended, and actual use of existing facilities at each school site. Elements considered include: DSA= Division of the State Architect, Applications, Certification/Status Functionality = Serving a purpose well Adequacy = Ability to meet needs; suitability Criticality = Being of the highest importance, life-cycle of a system Code= Requirements for Compliance Elements Considered Issues considered during the facility Master Plan process/assessment evaluation phase were divided into three parts based on site,and District planning priorities. Elements considered in each level of assessment are as follows,but not limited to: Building Systems (Indirect support to Instruction) Power and electrical:what are the conditions and are upgrades required Site functionality and appearance:does the site functionality contribute to academic? Furniture,fixtures and equipment:what are the conditions and are upgrades required? Restrooms:are restrooms maintained and functional;are they ADA accessible? Heating and cooling:what are the conditions and are upgrades required? Lighting:what are the conditions and are upgrades required? What energy efficiency standards might be considered? Water and plumbing:what are the conditions and are upgrades required? Roofing:what are the conditions and are upgrades required? Window systems:what are the conditions and are upgrades required? What energy efficiency standards might be considered? Structural conditions:are there any readily visible or known seismic or structural issues that need to be addressed? Flooring:what are the conditions and are upgrades required? Storage:what are the conditions and are upgrades required? Code Compliance, Safety and Security (Indirect support to Instruction) Accessibility:do accessible paths of travel exist between campus entry and all campus facilities? Fire alarms:are they provided per code requirements? Lighting:is there appropriate lighting on the site during and after hours? Signage:is signage up to current code? Gates:are gates accessible to pedestrians,fire access,as required by DSA and local agencies? Secure enclosures:are sites secure during and after school hours? Secure drop-off/pick-up zones:are there appropriate drop-off/pick-up zones for pedestrian and vehicular traffic? Parking and circulation:does the parking adequately address all mobility needs, including students and staff driving, walking, and bicycling safely to and from the school site? Learning Environments for the 21st Century (Direct support to Instruction) The need/creation of “STEAM”Science Technology Engineering Art & Math focused facilities and modernization needs were identified Are adequate facilities available to support the academic curriculum of 21st century learning environments? How can existing programs be better be supported? Library and lab facilities:how does the form follow the function of these learning spaces and are they conducive to use in a 21st century learning environment? Cafeteria and multipurpose spaces:do they provide adequate flexibility, and accommodate current and future academy needs? Office efficiency:how does the form follow the function of this space,and does the environment allow for a flexible adjustment to staff functions over time? Play areas:what are the conditions and are upgrades required? Palm Springs Unified School District LRFMP 4Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Summary of Student Enrollment Projections by School of Residence Current Enrollment Projected Enrollment (Residence) 2018/2019 School Year School Attendance Area Attendance Residence 2019/ 2020 2020/ 2021 2021/ 2022 2022/ 2023 2023/ 2024 2024/ 2025 2025/ 2026 Agua Caliente Elementary 543 856 898 937 982 1,027 1,055 1,055 1,052 Agua Caliente/Cielo Vista Charter[1]N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bella Vista Elementary 760 976 1,009 1,059 1,125 1,204 1,317 1,398 1,499 Bubbling Wells Elementary 713 697 710 683 679 679 688 688 686 Cabot Yerxa Elementary 704 607 583 568 541 529 527 527 526 Cahuilla Elementary 526 329 317 323 325 323 318 317 316 Cahuilla/Cielo Vista Charter[1]N/A 168 168 173 179 185 185 185 184 Cathedral City Elementary 668 658 683 715 728 741 746 746 743 Cathedral City/Cielo Vista Charter[1]N/A 23 29 34 35 32 33 33 33 Della Lindley Elementary 595 605 629 670 709 747 771 804 830 Julius Corsini Elementary 446 559 579 595 615 622 623 623 620 Katherine Finchy Elementary 657 329 318 315 317 317 322 323 323 Landau Elementary 742 700 693 696 695 703 720 735 734 Rancho Mirage Elementary 437 341 328 335 331 315 303 303 305 Rio Vista Elementary 714 551 534 528 517 525 531 533 531 Sunny Sands Elementary 731 616 599 595 565 562 552 530 528 Two Bunch Palms Elementary 807 943 961 984 982 1,016 1,043 1,045 1,042 Vista Del Monte Elementary 547 531 565 609 651 692 723 733 740 Desert Springs Middle 969 1,023 945 911 877 892 867 863 866 James Workman Middle 1,299 1,186 1,159 1,115 1,097 1,055 1,029 994 1,008 Nellie Coffman Middle 1,097 1,145 1,121 1,037 1,047 1,079 1,159 1,188 1,232 Painted Hills Middle 820 947 992 958 1,014 992 1,007 1,086 1,224 Raymond Cree Middle 857 713 727 720 684 665 687 728 769 Cathedral City High 1,660 1,706 1,685 1,676 1,637 1,577 1,520 1,452 1,418 Desert Hot Springs High 1,775 2,287 2,289 2,372 2,356 2,360 2,371 2,355 2,388 Palm Springs High 1,664 1,045 1,014 1,057 1,090 1,131 1,103 1,083 1,053 Rancho Mirage High School 1,569 1,542 1,485 1,416 1,440 1,410 1,376 1,387 1,366 Mount San Jacinto High 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 304 IDT/Unmatched N/A 217 217 217 217 217 217 217 217 Total 21,604 21,604 21,540 21,600 21,739 21,903 22,093 22,237 22,538 [1] The Cielo Vista Charter Priority Attendance Area Boundary encompasses portions of the Agua Caliente Elementary School, Cahuilla Elementary School, and Cathedral City Elementary School attendance areas. LRFMP 5Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Summary of Student Enrollment Projections by School of Residence Current Projected Enrollment (Residence) Enrollment School Year Grade 2018/ 2019 2019/ 2020 2020/ 2021 2021/ 2022 2022/ 2023 2023/ 2024 2024/ 2025 2025/ 2026 TK 326 336 334 336 342 347 350 357 K 1,516 1,550 1,545 1,550 1,568 1,583 1,593 1,613 1 1,520 1,627 1,676 1,673 1,679 1,701 1,719 1,737 2 1,490 1,512 1,633 1,683 1,680 1,687 1,711 1,733 3 1,595 1,524 1,554 1,679 1,731 1,730 1,740 1,769 4 1,535 1,610 1,550 1,585 1,716 1,770 1,771 1,786 5 1,608 1,543 1,626 1,571 1,606 1,738 1,794 1,799 6 1,642 1,582 1,525 1,607 1,549 1,584 1,717 1,775 7 1,747 1,644 1,595 1,538 1,620 1,562 1,598 1,738 8 1,653 1,746 1,648 1,603 1,543 1,630 1,573 1,615 9 1,743 1,746 1,847 1,759 1,709 1,641 1,730 1,678 10 1,740 1,704 1,715 1,815 1,726 1,678 1,614 1,703 11 1,747 1,695 1,674 1,683 1,771 1,692 1,651 1,598 12 1,742 1,720 1,677 1,657 1,664 1,750 1,675 1,637 Total District Enrollment 21,604 21,540 21,600 21,739 21,903 22,093 22,237 22,538 Page intentionally left blank. LRFMP 6Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 CATHEDRAL CITY HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARY2.1 CATHEDRAL CITY HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARY2.1 CATHEDRAL CITY HIGH CATHEDRAL CITY HIGH Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 1Cover Sheet PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.PSUSD.us Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-7 Existing Campus Asset Summary 8 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 9 Existing Campus Image Key Map 10 Existing Campus Images 11 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Cathedral City High School Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 2Executive Summary Executive Summary Cathedral City High School Mission &Vision Cathedral City High School,in partnership with parents and community members,is dedicated to providing an educational experience that guides students toward successful,fulfilling lives as responsible, productive, and global citizens.Students are expected to acquire academic,artistic, athletic, and technical skills in preparation for college and careers. A culture of health-consciousness and ethical behaviors is fostered by the school.The CCHS community values diversity and offers the training and experience that expands students’ awareness to include appreciation and acceptance of practices and points of view found in other parts of the world. Neighborhood CCHS draws its student population from several desert communities and most of its students live in Cathedral City, California.CCHS has grown from 700 students to an enrollment of nearly 1,700 students reported in the 2016 CBEDs data.86%of the students represent a minority population. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,athletic facilities,assembly areas, performing arts center, cafeteria, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Educational Programs Offered: •English I, II, III •Economics •Edgenuity English •AP Physics •German I, II, III •Intro to Health •Spanish I, II, III •Emerging Lit •French I, II, III •Job Prep •Physics •Dance I, II, III •Social Studies/History A •Biology I, II, III •World History •MESA •Contemporary Media •Stats •US History •Concert Glee •Art, I, II,III •Chamber Singers •Anatomy •Concert Choir •Strategies for Success •Weight Training •Chemistry, Honors, AP •Public Health Solutions •Life Skills •Visual Arts •Biology, Honors •Ceramics I, II, III •Lifetime Sports •Digital Photography •PE, Adaptive •Media Literacy •Adv.Concepts Me Prof •Photo II/ Animation/DI •AP Language •Studio Painting •AVID •Folklorico •Adult Transition Program (ATP) Academies: •Digital Arts Technology Academy (DATA) •Health & Environmental Academy of Learning (HEAL) •Math Engineering Science Achievement (MESA) •Robotics •Cosmetology (Off Campus) N Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 3 Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Cathedral City High School 9-12 Nellie Coffman Middle School 6-8 Agua Caliente Elementary School K-5 Cathedral City Elementary School K-5 Rio Vista Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 5 Schools Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 4Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:48 acres Current Athletic Fields:: Rubber Surface Play Area: Asphalt Surface Play Area: Asphalt Parking Area: PK-1 PK-2 PK-3 PK-4 B-F B-A1 B-A2 B-A4 B-A3 B-E1 B-E2 B-E3 B-E4 B-D1 B-D2 B-D3 B-D4 M-G1M-G2 M-G3 B-G5 B-GRR P-1 P-2 P-3 P-17 P-18 B-C1 B-C2 B-G B-GSHB-GHV B-H POOL B-BB1 B-BB2 B-25 B-25 B-25 SOLAR-1LS-1-5 SOLAR-2SOLAR-3SOLAR-4SOLAR-5SOLAR-6SOLAR-7SOLAR-8SOLAR-9SOLAR-10SOLAR-11SOLAR-12B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. B-B SOLAR-RT Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 5Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234- 4713 (760) 770-0100 (760) 770-0149 33 67173 3330578 10279 Original Construction Date 1993 Original Capacity (MP 2012)1,364 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 112 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)48 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 3,364 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 95 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 225,068 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 1,660 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 17 1,418 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 11,290,553 7,527,035 16,219,043 10,812,695 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-F BUILDING F Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1991 A# 51230 2 24078 S 3 B-B BUILDING B Permanent GYMNASIUM / COMMONS 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 41579 S 3 B-A1 BUILDING A Permanent THEATER 1991 A# 51230 1 9655 S 3 B-A2 BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 702-708 EVEN / KITCHEN 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 12956 S 3 B-A3 BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 703-709 ODD / 806-812 EVEN 1992 A# 55490 1 9551 S 3 B-A4 BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 801-815 ODD 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 11338 S 3 B-E1 BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 102-118 EVEN 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 8842 S 3 B-E2 BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 101-115 ODD / 202-216 EVEN 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 23497 S 3 B-E3 BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 201-217 ODD 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 9244 S 3 B-E4 BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 120/122/219/221 1992 A# 55490 1 3784 S 3 B-D1 BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 302-318 EVEN 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 9096 S 3 B-D2 BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 320/322/419/421 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 3784 S 3 B-D3 BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-417 ODD 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 9096 S 3 B-D4 BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 301-321 ODD / 402-422 EVEN 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 26119 S 3 Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 6Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index M-G1 BUILDING G -RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 501-504 2002 A# 102349 2 3840 S 2 M-G2 BUILDING G -RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 505-508 2002 A# 109063 2 3840 S 2 M-G3 BUILDING G -RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 509-512 2002 A# 116605 2 3840 S 2 B-G4 BUILDING G -RELO Permanent ELEVATOR TOWER @ 500 BLDGS.2002 A# 102349 2 191 S 2 B-GRR RESTROOM Permanent RESTROOMS @ 500 BLDGS.2002 A# 107815 1 645 C 2 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P1 1991 A# 57455 1 960 S 3 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P2 1991 A# 57455 1 960 S 3 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P3 1991 A# 57455 1 960 S 3 P-17 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P17 1991 A# 57455 1 960 S 3 P-18 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P18 1991 A# 57455 1 960 S 3 B-C1 BUILDING C Permanent ELECTRICAL BUILDING 1991 A# 51230 1 1476 C 3 B-C2 BUILDING C Permanent CHILLERS & CANOPY -(3) 1991 A# 51230 1 1200 S 3 B-G BUILDING G Permanent FOOTBALL PRESSBOX / ELEVATOR 1991 A# 62835 2 328 S 3 B-GSH GRANDSTANDS HOME Permanent HOME GRANDSTAND / TEAM ROOMS 1991 A# 62835 1 12375 S 3 B-GSV GRANDSTANDS VISITOR Permanent VISITOR GRANDSTAND 1991 A# 62835 1 7515 S 3 B-BB1 BASEBALL DUGOUT Permanent BASEBALL HOME DUGOUT / STORAGE 1991 A# 62835 1 825 C 3 B-BB2 BASEBALL DUGOUT Permanent BASEBALL VISITOR DUGOUT 1991 A# 62835 1 473 C 3 B-EN ENTRY GATES Permanent ENTRY PORTICOS / GATES (3)1991 A# 62835 1 1512 S 3 P-P POOL Permanent POOL 2017 A# 114416 1 B-H BUILDING H Permanent STADIUM RESTROOM/SNACK COMPLEX 2010 A# 110640 1 Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 7Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 STAFF PARKING AREA STAFF PARKING AREA A 1992 A# 55490 3 PK-2 STAFF PARKING AREAS STAFF PARKING AREAS 1991 A# 51230 3 PK-3 STAFF PARKING AREAS STAFF PARKING AREAS 1991 A# 51230 3 PK-4 STUDENT PARKING AREA STUDENT PARKING AREA 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 3 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTERS Shelters LUNCH SHELTERS (1 of 5)2006 A# 109838 1 1720 S 2 LS-2 LUNCH SHELTERS Shelters LUNCH SHELTERS (2 of 5)2006 A# 109838 2 LS-3 LUNCH SHELTERS Shelters LUNCH SHELTERS (3 of 5)2006 A# 109838 2 LS-4 LUNCH SHELTERS Shelters LUNCH SHELTERS (4 of 5)2006 A# 109838 2 LS-5 LUNCH SHELTERS Shelters LUNCH SHELTERS (5 of 5)2006 A# 109838 2 Solar-1 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(1 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-2 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(2 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-3 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(3 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-4 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(4 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-5 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(5 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-6 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(6 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-7 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(7 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-8 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(8 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-9 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(9 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-10 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(10 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-11 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(11 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-12 AT STUDENT PARKING Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(12 of 13)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-RT ROOFTOP SOLAR Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Rooftop Gym) -(13 of 13)2018 A# 116426 PPA 1 MARQUEES Signs Marquee Signs (2)2018 A# 116486 1 Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 8Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers P1 Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District 2019 Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 10Existing Campus Image Key Map A Image Key 1 A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 B N Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 11Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 CCHS 12Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. N NELLIE N. COFFMAN MIDDLE NELLIE N. COFFMAN MIDDLE NCMS1 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Cover Sheet Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan NCMS2 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Nellie N. Coffman Middle School (NNCMS) Mission To promote the 21st Century Skills,(4 C’s: Communication, Collaboration,Critical thinking and Creativity) and a growth mindset to ready students to become college and career ready.To promote bilingualism within our learning community. Vision Provide a learning environment that supports students in reaching their academic, social and emotional potential. Neighborhood NNCMS is situated on the boundaries of Cathedral City and Rancho Mirage proudly connecting to the community. Instruction NNCMS serves a diverse population of approximately 1098 6th, 7 th and 8th students using district-approved curriculum to design instruction for its students in the California State Standards for each grade.NNCMS’ elective program includes digital arts, band, journalism, study skills,engineering, art and student leadership. Special Education services are provided for students who qualify with special needs. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices,classrooms, assembly area,multi-purpose room,kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •Social Studies •EXCEL •Reasoning/Writing •AVID •ELD I, II •Leadership •Art •Band, Beg, Adv •Choir •Media Design, Adv •PE •Engineering •Drama N NCMS3 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Cathedral City High School 9-12 Nellie Coffman Middle School 6-8 Agua Caliente Elementary School K-5 Cathedral City Elementary School K-5 Rio Vista Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 5 Schools NCMS4 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Site Information Totals Current Site Area:25 Acres Current Playground Area::11.8 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A Existing Campus Asset Plan PK-1 PK-3 BUS-1 SOLAR-1 SOLAR-2 SOLAR-3 SOLAR-4 PK-2 B-500 B-100 B-200 B-300 B-S P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1 P-9 P-8 P-7 P-6 SS-1 LS-1 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. NCMS5 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34-603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234- 6326 (760) 770-8617 (760) 770-8623 33 67173 6059091 4563 Original Construction Date 1973 Original Capacity (MP 2012)1,240 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 48 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)25 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,398 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 39 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 107,149 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 1,094 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 9 1,232 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 805,619 537,079 1,205,124 803,416 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-500 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Permanent ADMINISTRATION 2007 A# 107444 1 7227 S 2 B-100 CLASSROOM BUILDING 100 Permanent LIBRARY / OFFICE / CLASSROOM BUILDING 100 1976 A# 36760 A# 112650 / 103793 2013 1 44378 S 1 B-200 CLASSROOM BUILDING 200 Permanent CLASSROOM BUILDING 200 1976 A# 61423 A# 103793 2002 1 20469 S 2 B-300 MPR BUILDING 300 Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING 300 1976 A# 36760 A# 103793 2002 1 25482 S 2 B-S CHILLER BUILDING Permanent MECHANICAL BUILDING / ENCLOSURE 1977 A# 36760 / 107671 A# 107671 2019 1 2400 C 1 P-5 RELO 5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 401 2000 A# 69217 1 960 S 2 P-4 RELO 4 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 402 2000 A# 69217 1 960 S 2 P-3 RELO 3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 403 2000 A# 69217 1 960 S 2 P-2 RELO 2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 404 2002 A# 102346 1 960 S 2 P-1 RELO 1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 405 1998 A# 102346 1 960 D 3 P-9 RELO 9 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 501 2001 A# 102346 1 960 S 2 P-8 RELO 8 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 502 2001 A# 105089 1 960 S 2 P-7 RELO 7 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 503 2002 A# 105089 1 960 S 2 P-6 RELO 6 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 504 2003 A# 105089 1 960 S 2 NCMS6 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING LOT-1 PARKING LOT-1 2006 A# 107671 A# 107671 2006 2 PK-2 PARKING LOT-2 PARKING LOT-2 1976 A# 36760 A# 107671 2006 2 PK-3 PARKING LOT-3 PARKING LOT-3 2006 A# 107671 A# 107671 2006 2 BUS-1 BUS DROP OFF BUS DROP OFF 2006 A# 107671 A# 107671 2006 2 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTERS Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (2)2007 A# 109837 1 1440 S 2 WW-1 WALKWAY Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1976 A# 36760 1 4380 S 5 SS-1 SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE STRUCTURE 2006 A# 107671 2 Solar-1 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(1 of 4)2015 A# 113546 PPA 1 Solar-2 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(2 of 4)2015 A# 113546 PPA 1 Solar-3 South West Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(3 of 4)2015 A# 113546 PPA 1 Solar-4 South West Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(4 of 4)2015 A# 113546 PPA 1 NCMS7 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers NCMS8 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 N Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 67 AB A B NCMS9 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NCMS10 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 N Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. N AGUA CALIENTE ELEMENTARY AGUA CALIENTE ELEMENTARY Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 ACES 1Cover Sheet PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.PSUSD.us Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Map 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5 Existing Campus Asset Summary 6 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 7 Existing Campus Image Key Map 8 Existing Campus Images 9 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Agua Caliente Elementary School Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 ACES 2Executive Summary Executive Summary Agua Caliente Elementary School Mission &Vision Agua Caliente Elementary School (ACES)works together with students, parents, and teachers to inspire a love of learning and develop productive members of society with high expectations for all. ACES creates a supportive environment where students are empowered o take ownership of their learning. Neighborhood ACES serves the community of Cathedral City, California and currently has an enrollment of 540 students (2018-2019 CDE Enrollment Data). Summary of Facilities A new ACES campus was built on the existing ACES site and completed in 2018.The new ACES campus consists of six one-and two-story buildings, totaling approximately 82,000 ft².The new campus includes classrooms,MPR,library,administration offices, food services,special use classrooms and supportive spaces.The original school was built in 1960 and operated while the new campus was under construction. Educational Programs Offered •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science •English Language Development N Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 ACES 3Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other DHSHS Boundary Attendance Area Boundary Schools Grades Served Agua Caliente Elementary School K-5 Cathedral City Elementary School K-5 Rio Vista Elementary School K-5 Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 6-8 Cathedral City High School 9-12 Total Schools 6 Schools Additional Attendance Area School James Workman Middle School 6-8 Palm Springs Unified School District James Workman MS Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 ACES 4Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:12.1 acres Current Athletic Fields::N/A Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A B-D B-A B-B B-B B-B B-C B-E PK-1 PA-1 PA-2 Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 ACES 5Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE I =Insurance Data This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019.The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review, including site walks,staff input, andreview of aerialphotographs. Palm Springs Unified School District School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Agua Caliente Elementary School 30-800 San Luis Rey Plaza Cathedral City, CA 92234-6045 (760) 416-8235 (760) 416-8245 33 67173 6032387 4559 Original Construction Date 2016 Original Capacity (MP 2012)N/A Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 33 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size 12.1 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 33 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 61,327 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 541 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 0 1,052 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. $1,249,800 $833,200 $833,200 $1,217,793 5/29/2021 (>50 in 2020)2020, 2028 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-A ADMIN BLDG. 'A'PERMANENT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING A 2018 A# 114748 1 5440 1 B-B BLDG. 'B'PERMANENT CLASSROOM BUILDING B 2018 A# 114748 2 16276 1 B-C BLDG. 'C'PERMANENT CLASSROOM BUILDING C 2018 A# 114748 2 15584 1 B-D BLDG. 'D'PERMANENT CLASSROOM BUILDING D 2018 A# 114748 2 12750 1 B-E BLDG. 'E'PERMANENT MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING E 2018 A# 114748 1 11277 1 Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 SCHOOL PARKING SCHOOL PARKING 2018 A# 114748 1 PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2018 A# 114748 1 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA -KINDERGARTEN 2018 A# 114748 1 Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 ACES 6Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers First Floor Second Floor 2114 Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 ACES 8Existing Campus Image Key Map Palm Springs Unified School District Image Key 1 1 3 3 2 1 2 4 8 5 6 9 10 7 N Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 ACES 9Existing Campus Images Palm Springs Unified School District 4 5 8 7 6 9 10 Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 ACES 10Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects New Campus –No proposed projects at this time. General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Palm Springs Unified School District N CATHEDRAL CITY ELEMENTARY CATHEDRAL CITY ELEMENTARY CCES 1 Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Cathedral City Elementary School Cover Sheet PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Map 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan CCES 2 Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Cathedral City Elementary School (CCES) Vision and Mission The mission of Cathedral City Elementary School is to provide and continually enhance a highly academic and safe environment through a collaborative partnership with staff,families and the community that, despite all challenges, results in students who experience excellence in education and technology, master state standards, succeed on standardized tests,and are prepared as responsible and independent members of society. Neighborhood Cathedral City Elementary School is located in Cathedral City,California Instruction Cathedral City Elementary School provides services for approximately 725 students in grades TK-5th grades as well as providing special education programs on site such as:speech and language services,RSP services and mild/moderate SDC classrooms. A special education collaboration model is utilized where instruction reflects content and performance standards which ensure all students have access to the core curriculum. A smooth transition from Early Childhood Education (ECE)to Kindergarten is ensured by the early participation of Kindergarten teachers with ECE teachers. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices,classrooms, multi-purpose room, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N CCES 3 Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Cathedral City High School 9-12 Nellie Coffman Middle School 6-8 Agua Caliente Elementary School K-5 Cathedral City Elementary School K-5 Rio Vista Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 5 Schools CCES 4 Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:8 Acres Current Playground Area::N/A Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A B-5B B-5B B-5A B-5A P-2 P-3 P-4 P-6 P-7P-5 SS-2 SS-1 B-3 M-1 PA-2 PK-1 PK-2 PK-3 BUS-1 B-2 B-6 P-8 P-9 M-2P-1 B-4 B-4 WW-1 SS-3 PA-1 B-5C B-5C SOLAR-1 SOLAR-2 SOLAR-3 B-8 B-7 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. CCES 5 Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234- 7040 (760) 770-8583 (760) 770-4703 33 67173 6032403 4561 Original Construction Date 2000 Original Capacity (MP 2012)1,054 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 43 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)8 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,225 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 35 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 70,156 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 667 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 9 743 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-2 BLDG. '2'Permanent ADMINISTRATION 2000 A# 101036 1 6746 D 2 B-3 BLDG. '3'Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 2000 A# 101036 1 9074 D 2 B-4 BLDG. '4'Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-8 2000 A# 101036 1 8935 D 2 B-5A BLDG. '5A'Permanent CLASSROOMS 11-18 2000 A# 101036 1 8935 D 2 B-5B BLDG. '5B'Permanent CLASSROOMS 21-28 2000 A# 101036 1 8935 D 2 B-5C BLDG. '5C'Permanent CLASSROOMS 31-38 2000 A# 101036 1 8935 D 2 B-6 BLDG. '6'Permanent CLASSROOMS 51-52 2000 A# 101036 1 1118 D 2 B-7 RESTROOM Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING -PLAYGROUND 2000 A# 101036 1 1512 D 2 B-8 RESTROOM Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING 2000 A# 101036 1 4386 D 2 M-1 CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR KDG CLASSROOM 53 2000 A# 102561 1 960 D 2 M-2 CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR HEADSTART CLASSROOM 1 2000 A# 102561 1 1280 S 2 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE HEADSTART CLASSROOM 2 2000 A# 101036 1 960 D 2 M-3 RESTROOM Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS 2000 A# 101036 1 136 S 2 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 61 2000 A# 106307 1 960 S 2 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 62 2000 A# 106307 1 960 S 2 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 63 2000 A# 106307 1 960 S 2 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 44 2000 A# 105123 1 960 D 2 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 45 2002 A# 106307 1 960 S 2 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 46 2002 A# 106307 1 960 S 2 P-8 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 54 2016 A# 114822 1 960 S 1 P-9 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 55 2016 A# 114822 1 960 S 1 CCES 6 Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 SCHOOL PARKING SCHOOL PARKING 2000 A# 101036 2 PK-2 SCHOOL PARKING SCHOOL PARKING 2000 A# 101036 2 PK-3 KINDER PARKING KINDER PARKING 2000 A# 101036 2 BUS-1 BUS LOADING / UNLOADING BUS LOADING / UNLOADING 2000 A# 101036 2 PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2012 A# 112523 1 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREAS 2012 A# 112523 1 SS-1 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS 2000 A# 101036 1 4364 D 2 SS-2 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS 2000 A# 101036 2 WW-1 WALKWAY Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 2000 A# 101036 1 7044 S 2 SS-3 SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117727 2018 1 Solar-1 SOLAR SOLAR PANELS SOLAR PANELS (PARKING)2015 A# 114174 PPA 1 Solar-2 SOLAR SOLAR PANELS SOLAR PANELS (PARKING)2015 A# 114174 PPA 1 Solar-3 SOLAR SOLAR PANELS SOLAR PANELS (PARKING)2015 A# 114174 PPA 1 CCES 7 Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers Multi-Purpose CCES 8 Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 A A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 N CCES 9 Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 2 4 3 1 6 8 7 5 9 Existing Campus Images CCES 10 Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N RIO VISTA ELEMENTARY RIO VISTA ELEMENTARY RVES 1 Rio Vista Elementary School 67-770 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Rio Vista Elementary School 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Cover Sheet Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan RVES 2 Rio Vista Elementary School 67-770 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Rio Vista Elementary School (RVES) Mission Rio Vista Elementary School is a school of excellence where our community of learners, including all faculty, students, parents and community members work as a team to increase student achievement,build academic success,encourage good citizenship, develop healthy values, and elevate a sense of happiness and well-being for all students. •Rio Vista promotes good manners and good citizenship: respect, perseverance, kindness, fairness, responsibility, friendship, caring, trustworthiness, consideration, and pride. •Rio Vista instills a desire to learn in each child. •Parents and teachers are sensitive to each child’s individual needs so that every student reaches his/her potential. •Every student is challenged to strive for his or her best. •Rio Vista is a safe and secure environment that supports diversity and inclusion. •Rio Vista provides a well-rounded,enriched education to establish college readiness. •All children are encouraged to be and achieve all that they can,with guidance and support from all school personnel and parents. Neighborhood Rio Vista Elementary School is located in Cathedral City, California.RVES is located in a large home building community where the majority of students live within walking distance, Instruction Rio Vista Elementary School provides services for approximately 730 students in grades K-5th grades. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,multi- purpose room,kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. A Headstart building is also on campus. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N RVES 3 Rio Vista Elementary School 67-770 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Cathedral City High School 9-12 Nellie Coffman Middle School 6-8 Agua Caliente Elementary School K-5 Cathedral City Elementary School K-5 Rio Vista Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 5 Schools RVES 4 Rio Vista Elementary School 67-770 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Site Information Totals Current Site Area:12.3 Acres Current Playground Area::5.6 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A Existing Campus Asset Plan SS-1 M-HS SS-2 PK-2 B-6 P-4P-3P-2P-1 PA-2 PK-1 SS-3 LS-2 LS-1 B-8 B-3 B-9 B-5B B-2 B-4 PA-1 B-5A B-7 WW-1 P-K3 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. P-K4 RVES 5 Rio Vista Elementary School 67-770 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Rio Vista Elementary School 67-700 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234- 5508 (760) 416-0032 (760) 416-0087 33 67173 0105767 11029 Original Construction Date 2002 Original Capacity (MP 2012)806 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 40 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)12.3 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,084 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 34 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 65,292 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 716 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 7 531 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60% District Share @40% Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-2 BLDG. '2'Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 2004 A# 103970 1 7031 D 2 B-3 BLDG. '3'Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 2004 A# 103970 1 7277 D 2 B-4 BLDG. '4'Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-408 2004 A# 103970 1 8264 D 2 B-5A BLDG. '5A'Permanent CLASSROOMS 501-508 2004 A# 103970 1 8264 D 2 B-5B BLDG. '5B'Permanent CLASSROOMS 601-608 2004 A# 103970 1 8264 D 2 B-9 BLDG. '9'Permanent CLASSROOMS 701-708 2008 A# 108136 1 8269 D 2 B-7 BLDG. '7'Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING / CUSTODIAL STORAGE 2004 A# 103970 1 2180 D 2 B-8 BLDG. '8' TOILETS Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING -PLAYGROUND 2004 A# 103970 1 1110 D 2 B-6 KINDERGARTEN Permanent KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOMS K1-K2 2004 A# 103970 1 3822 D 2 P-K3 RELO Portable PORTABLE KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOMS K3 2016 A# 114658 1 1440 1 P-K4 RELO Portable PORTABLE KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOMS K4 2016 A# 114658 1 1440 1 M-HS RELO Modular HEADSTART MODULAR 2004 A# 105124 1 1440 D 2 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P2 1998 A# 107323 1 960 S 3 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P1 2006 A# 107323 1 960 2 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P3 2008 A# 108847 1 960 2 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P4 2008 A# 108847 1 960 2 RVES 6 Rio Vista Elementary School 67-770 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (1 of 2)2013 A# 112737 1 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (2 of 2)2013 A# 112737 1 PK-1 PARKING 1 PARKING 1 2004 A# 103970 2 PK-2 PARKING 2 PARKING 2 2004 A# 103970 2 WW-1 WALKWAYS Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 2004 A# 103970 1 8054 S 2 SS-1 SHADE STRUCT Shelter SHADE STRUCTURE 2004 A# 105124 2 SS-2 SHADE STRUCT Shelter SHADE STRUCTURE 2004 A# 103970 2 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (1 of 2)2004 A# 103970 1 3036 D 2 LS-2 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (2 of 2)2004 A# 103970 2 SS-3 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117558 2018 1 RVES 7 Rio Vista Elementary School 67-770 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers RVES 8 Rio Vista Elementary School 67-770 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B A B N RVES 9 Rio Vista Elementary School 67-770 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RVES 10 Rio Vista Elementary School 67-770 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019La Canada WayCampus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N DESERT HOT SPRINGSHIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARY2.2 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARY2.2 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 1Cover Sheet PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.PSUSD.us Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-7 Existing Campus Asset Summary 8 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 9 Existing Campus Image Key Map 10 Existing Campus Images 11 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Desert Hot Springs High School Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 2Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Success 101 •Chorale 1 Choir 2 •English I, II, III, IV, Honors, AP •Art I, II, III, AP •ERWC •Theater I, II, III •ELD I, II •Stage 2 PlayProd 1 •Math I,II,III, Honors •Emerging Lit Spanish •Pre Calc •Spanish I, II, III, AP •Calc AP •French I, II, III, AP •Stats, AP •Studio drawing) •WT •Digital Photo •PE Sports •Contemporary Media •CORE •Avd Digital Imaging •PE Sports •AVID •Dance I, II •CTE •Aerobics •ONEIL •ASB 1 Pre Leadership 1 •BAND •Earth Sci •ROTC •Biology, Honors, AP •APUSH •Chemistry, Honors, AP •Civ/Econ •Physics I, II •Gov Econ Honors, AP •Psychology •AP Euro •World History •US History Academies: •Renewable Energy Academy of Learning (REAL) •Public Safety Academy (PSA) •Academy for Careers in Education (ACE) Executive Summary Desert Hot Spring High School Mission DHSHS empowers all students to become productive citizens by providing diverse pathways for a variety of desired careers beyond high school graduation. Vision DHSHS is an academically competitive school in which students focus on college and career readiness.Students master cross-curricular content and formulate a 10-year plan that suits their individual learning strengths and goals.The staff engages in collaboration, employs the latest technology, and promotes innovation to increase student achievement and students’ ability to contribute positively to society. Neighborhood Desert Hot Springs High School is located in the City of Desert Hot Springs, located 10 miles north of Palm Springs,on a 45.25-acre site bound by 5th Street (north),Cholla Drive (east), Pierson Blvd (south) and Atlantic Avenue (west).DHSHS serves students from the communities of Desert Hot springs, North Palm Springs,Sky Valley and the unincorporated areas of Painted Hills and Mission Lakes.These communities reflect a student population mostly of Hispanic heritage. Instruction The school serves 9th through 12th grade.The campus houses two linked learning academies,a REAL (Renewable Energy Academy of Learning) and PSA (Public Safety Academy) that provide students with real-world experience helping them connect class work to their future career or college work. A third academy, the Academy for Careers in Education (ACE), opened recently and focuses on preparing future educators.DHSHS, through a partnership with the College of the Desert, has also expanded its AVID program, Advanced Placement offerings, and dual and concurrent enrollment opportunities. Summary of Facilities The school was constructed in 1998 and occupied in 1999.Besides classrooms the school has an unfinished Black Box Theater,a 300 seat theater,two computer labs, three athletic fields,a gymnasium,a library and an administration building.Desert Hot Springs High School is currently adding a new Safety Academy and Renewable Energy Career Technical Education (CTE)pathway buildings.Lighting of all fields is a desire.Only the stadium is lit at night. A new weight room to serve forty students is needed .The current weight room has very dated equipment.Campus does not have a field house and one is desired and centralized for all sports.N Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 3Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Desert Hot Springs High School 9-12 Desert Springs Middle School 6-8 Painted Hills Middle School 6-8 Bella Vista Elementary School K-5 Bubbling Wells Elementary School K-5 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School K-5 Julius Corsini Elementary School K-5 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 8 Schools Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 4Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:50.7 Acres Current Athletic Fields::26 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A PK-1 PK-2 B-F B-D1 B-D2 B-DRR B-D3 B-D5B-D4 B-ERRB-E1 B-E2 B-E3 B-E4 B-E5 B-E6 B-A1 B-A2 B-A3 B-A4 B-A5 B-A6B-A7 B-A8 B-B1 B-B2 B-C B-G B-H B-J B-PB B-GSH B-GSV M-1M-2 LS-1 P-1 SOLAR-1 SOLAR-2 SOLAR-3 SOLAR-4 SOLAR-5 SOLAR-6 SOLAR-7 SOLAR-8 SOLAR-9 SOLAR-10 SOLAR-11 SOLAR-12 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. P-2 P-3 P-4 CTE Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 5Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-3000 (760) 288-7000 (760) 288-7010 33 67173 3330818 8267 Original Construction Date 1998 Original Capacity (MP 2012)1,054 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 95 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)50.7 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 2,783 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 87 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 199,776 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 1,770 Relocatables (2019) PSUSD Provided 12 2,388 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 0 0 0 0 2023 N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-F ADMINISTRATION BUILDING F Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1999 A# 66705 1 19626 S 3 B-D1 CLASSROOM BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 101-109 ODD 1999 A# 66705 1 5225 S 3 B-D2 CLASSROOM BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 102-112 EVEN / 201-211 ODD, ETC 1999 A# 66705 1 13448 S 3 B-DRR RESTROOM Permanent BOYS RESTROOMS 200 1999 A# 66705 1 460 S 3 B-D3 CLASSROOM BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 212-216 / 250-254 EVEN 2006 A# 103898 2 5525 C 2 B-D4 CLASSROOM BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 218-228 / 256-266 2006 A# 103898 2 11050 C 2 B-D5 CLASSROOM BUILDING D Permanent 200 ELEVATOR / RESTROOMS / OFFICE 2006 A# 103898 2 2040 S 2 B-ERR RESTROOM Permanent GIRLS RESTROOMS 300 1999 A# 66705 1 460 S 3 B-E1 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 302-306 EVEN / 401-405 ODD, ETC 1999 A# 66705 1 10000 S 3 B-E2 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 402-408 EVEN 1999 A# 66705 1 4145 S 3 B-E3 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 309-315 / 351-357 ODD 2006 A# 103898 2 7232 C 2 B-E4 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 410-414 / 450-454 EVEN 2006 A# 103898 2 5472 C 2 B-E5 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 416-422 / 456-464 EVEN 2006 A# 103898 2 9696 C 2 Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 6Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE B-E6 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent 400 ELEVATOR / RESTROOMS / OFFICE 2006 A# 103898 2 1365 S 2 B-A1 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 501-505 ODD 1999 A# 66705 1 7033 S 3 B-A2 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 507 / 509 1999 A# 66705 1 3360 S 3 B-A3 BUILDING A -THEATER Permanent THEATER 1999 A# 66705 1 9752 S 3 B-A4 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 506 / 605 1999 A# 66705 1 2014 S 3 B-A5 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 602-606 EVEN / KITCHEN 1999 A# 66705 1 7190 S 3 B-A6 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CUSTODIAL AREA / RESTROOMS / COMP LAB 2006 A# 103898 1 2464 C 2 B-A7 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 614 / 615 BLACK BOX - Notes: WOOD SHOP & ACTORS STUDIO 2006 A# 103898 1 4659 C 2 B-A8 BUILDING A -CONFERENCE Permanent CONFERENCE ROOM 616 2006 A# 103898 1 393 S 2 B-B1 BUILDING B -GYMNASIUM Permanent GYMNASIUM / COMMONS 1999 A# 66705 1 44171 C 3 B-B2 BUILDING B -WEIGHT ROOM Permanent WRESTLING / WEIGHT ROOM / EQUIP SHELTER 2006 A# 103898 1 3266 C 2 B-C BUILDNG C Electric ELECTRIC BUILDING 2006 A# 103898 1 1160 C 2 B-H BUILDING H Permanent FOOTBALL CONCESSION / RESTROOMS 2006 A# 103898 1 3003 C 2 B-G BUILDING G Permanent FOOTBALL HOME LOCKER ROOM 2006 A# 103898 1 1980 C 2 B-J BUILDING J Permanent FOOTBALL VISITOR LOCKER ROOM 2006 A# 103898 1 1333 C 2 B-PB PRESSBOX Permanent FOOTBALL PRESSBOX / LIFT 1999 A# 103898 1 240 S 3 B-GSH GRANDSTANDS Permanent HOME GRANDSTANDS 2006 A# 105800 1 3915 S 2 B-GSV GRANDSTANDS Permanent VISITOR GRANDSTANDS 2006 A# 105800 1 1215 S 2 M-1 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 202-208 EVEN 2000 A# 101055 1 3920 S 2 M-2 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 301-307 ODD 2001 A# 102561 1 3920 S 2 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 430 2019 A# 117464 1 960 1 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 431 2019 A# 117464 1 960 1 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 432 2019 A# 117464 1 960 1 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 433 2019 A# 117464 1 960 1 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 7Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING 1 PARKING 1 1999 A# 66705 3 PK-2 PARKING 2 PARKING 2 1999 A# 66705 3 LS-1 LUNCH Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2006 A# 108236 1 1236 S 2 WW-1 WALKWAYS Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1999 A# 66705 1 15260 S 3 Solar-1 At South West Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(1 of 12)2014 A# 113869 2013 DO 1 Solar-2 At South West Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(2 of 12)2014 A# 113869 2013 DO 1 Solar-3 At East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(3 of 12)2014 A# 113014 2013 PPA 1 Solar-4 At East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(4 of 12)2014 A# 113014 2013 PPA 1 Solar-5 At East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(5 of 12)2014 A# 113014 2013 PPA 1 Solar-6 At East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(6 of 12)2014 A# 113014 2013 PPA 1 Solar-7 At East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(7 of 12)2014 A# 113014 2013 PPA 1 Solar-8 At East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(8 of 12)2014 A# 113014 2013 PPA 1 Solar-9 At East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(9 of 12)2014 A# 113014 2013 PPA 1 Solar-10 At East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(10 of 12)2014 A# 113014 2013 PPA 1 Solar-11 At East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(11 of 12)2014 A# 113014 2013 PPA 1 Solar-12 At East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(12 of 12)2014 A# 113014 2013 PPA 1 MARQUEE Signs Marquee Sign 2018 A# 116487 1 Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 8Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers First Floor New CTE Second Floor 433 432 431 430 Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District May 2019 Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 10Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A B N Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 11Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 DHSHS 12 N Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Notes: General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Potential Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects N-1 New CTE Building -#1 N-2 New CTE Building -#2 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. Reference Financial Summary for potential project cost and PSUSD Priority. N-1 N-2 DESERT SPRINGS MIDDLE DESERT SPRINGS MIDDLE DSMS 1 Desert Springs Middle School 66755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Desert Springs Middle School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Cover Sheet DSMS 2 Desert Springs Middle School 66755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Desert Springs Middle School (DSMS) Vision and Mission The educators, community members, parents,and students of Desert Springs Middle School are committed to providing all students with an opportunity to develop their achievements in ways that foster pride, appreciation for learning, and a sense of caring representative of our community. Neighborhood DSMS is located in Desert Hot Springs,California and serves students from Desert Hot Springs and Sky Valley communities. Instruction DSMS serves approximately 960 students in grades sixth, seventh, and eighth.It provides a comprehensive elective programs that include Technology,Art,Music and Foreign language (Spanish). Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices,classrooms,multi- purpose room,kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •English/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •Technology •Exploratory •Cultures • Success •Accelerated •US History, Honors •ELA Honors •Social Studies, Honors •Advanced Tech •ASB •PE, Adaptive •Pentathlon •Art, Adv •Beginning Band •Percussion •Spanish •Symphonic •Life Skills N DSMS 3 Desert Springs Middle School 66755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Desert Hot Springs High School 9-12 Desert Springs Middle School 6-8 Painted Hills Middle School 6-8 Bella Vista Elementary School K-5 Bubbling Wells Elementary School K-5 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School K-5 Julius Corsini Elementary School K-5 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 8 Schools DSMS 4 Desert Springs Middle School 66755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Site Information Totals Current Site Area:20.8 Acres Current Playground Area::10.7 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A Existing Campus Asset Plan B-1 B-2 B-3 B-3WE M-A M-B M-C B-D B-E LS-1 P-27 P-26 P-25 P-24 P-23 P-22 P-21 P-20 P-19 P-18 P-17 M-RR1 P-16 P-7 P-3 PK-1 BUS-1 P-RR1 SOLAR-3 SOLAR-4 SOLAR-5 SOLAR-2SOLAR-1 PK-2 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. M-ST DSMS 5 Desert Springs Middle School 66755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Desert Springs Middle School 66-755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-5775 (760) 251-7200 (760) 251-7206 33 67173 6108443 9602 Original Construction Date 1990 Original Capacity (MP 2012)558 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 55 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)20.8 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,597 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 41 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 119,916 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 965 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 14 866 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 5,637,031 3,758,021 8,291,469 5,527,646 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1 BUILDING 1 ADMIN Permanent ADMINISTRATION 1990 A# 51414 1 4761 S 3 B-2 BUILDING 2B MULTI- PURPOSE GYMNASIUM Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE / CLASSROOMS 1990 A# 51414 1 20559 S 3 B-3 BUILDING 3 LIBRARY Permanent LIBRARY 1990 A# 51414 1 6259 S 3 B-3WE BUILDING 3 EAST/WEST WINGS Permanent CLASSROOMS 201-208 , 209-2013 1990 A# 51414 1 25258 S 3 M-C BUILDING C Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 301-306 1990 A# 51056 1 6178 S 3 M-B BUILDING B Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 401-406 1990 A# 51056 1 6178 S 3 M-A BUILDING A Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 501-506 1990 A# 51056 1 7973 S 3 B-D BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 701-710 1991 A# 56983 1 10144 S 3 B-E ELECTRICAL Permanent ELECTRICAL BUILDING 1990 A# 51056 1 200 S 3 P-27 RELO 27 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 801 2002 A# 105252 1 960 S 2 P-26 RELO 26 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 802 2002 A# 105252 1 960 S 2 P-25 RELO 25 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 803 2002 A# 105252 1 960 S 2 P-24 RELO 24 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 804 2000 A# 102348 1 960 S 2 P-23 RELO 23 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 805 2001 A# 102348 1 960 S 2 P-22 RELO 22 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 806 2001 A# 102348 1 960 S 2 M-RR1 MODULAR RR Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS 800 2006 A# 107690 1 144 S 2 DSMS 6 Desert Springs Middle School 66755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE P-21 RELO 21 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 808 2000 A# 102348 1 960 S 2 P-20 RELO 20 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 809 1989 A# 28711 1 960 D 4 P-19 RELO 19 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 810 1986 A# 51282 1 960 D 4 P-18 RELO 18 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 811 1990 A# 29668 1 960 D 3 P-17 RELO 17 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 812 1989 A# 28718 1 960 D 4 P-16 RELO 16 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 813 2001 A# 102348 1 960 S 2 M-ST STORAGE Modular STORAGE CONTAINER 2000 A# 53739 1 144 S 2 P-7 RELO 7 Portable PORTABLE STAFF WORKROOM 909 2006 A# 107609 1 960 S 2 P-RR1 RELO RR Portable RESTROOM PORTABLE 900 2006 A# 108970 1 480 S 2 P-3 RELO 3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 905 2006 A# 108970 1 960 2 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING LOT PARKING LOT A 1990 A# 51414 3 PK-2 PARKING LOT PARKING LOT B 1990 A# 51414 3 BUS-1 BUS DROP OFF BUS DROP OFF 1990 A# 51414 3 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1990 A# 51414 1 4650 C 3 Solar-1 At Basketball Courts Solar Panels Solar Canopy(Play Area)2018 A# 114258 DO 1 Solar-2 At Basketball Courts Solar Panels Solar Canopy(Play Area)2018 A# 114258 DO 1 Solar-3 North East Parking Lot Solar Panels Solar Canopy (Parking) 2018 A# 114258 DO 1 Solar-4 North East Parking Lot Solar Panels Solar Canopy (Parking) 2018 A# 114258 DO 1 Solar-5 North East Parking Lot Solar Panels Solar Canopy (Parking) 2018 A# 114258 DO 1 DSMS 7 Desert Springs Middle School 66755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers DSMS 8 Desert Springs Middle School 66755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 N Existing Campus Image Key Map 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B Image Key 1 A B N DSMS 9 Desert Springs Middle School 66755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DSMS 10 Desert Springs Middle School 66755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 N Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. N PAINTED HILLS MIDDLE PAINTED HILLS MIDDLE PHMS 1 Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Painted Hills Middle School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Cover Sheet www.planPSUSD.org 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5 Existing Campus Asset Summary 6 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 7 Existing Campus Image Key Map 8 Existing Campus Images 9 Campus Aerial & Master Plan PHMS 2 Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Painted Hills Middle School (PHMS) Vision Painted Hills Middle School (PHMS)is an exemplary middle school that provides rigorous educational programs in a safe environment that embraces diversity and cultivate a culture of collaboration among all stakeholders – resulting in a well-rounded young adolescents who are ready for the demands of high school. Mission Painted Hills Middle School prepares young adolescent students for high school by equipping them with the social and academic skills needed to succeed. Neighborhood PHMS is Newer school located in the City if Desert Hot Springs, California serving students from Desert Hot Springs, Whitewater, Painted Hills,North Palm Springs, and Sky Valley. Instruction PHMS serves approximately 800 students in sixth,seventh, and eighth grade. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices,classrooms,multi-purpose room, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •English/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science, Honors •Leadership •Math Honors •AVID •PBL •Robotics •US History, Honors •LA Honors •Social Studies, Honors •STEM •Crossfit •ASB •PE •Art, I, II •Beginning Band •Wind Ensemble •Choir, Beg, Adv •Jazz Band •Study Skills N PHMS 3 Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Desert Hot Springs High School 9-12 Desert Springs Middle School 6-8 Painted Hills Middle School 6-8 Bella Vista Elementary School K-5 Bubbling Wells Elementary School K-5 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School K-5 Julius Corsini Elementary School K-5 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 8 Schools PHMS 4 Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:18.8 Acres Current Playground Area::6.2 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A PK-2 PK-1 PK-3 B-1000-2000 B-3000 LS-1 SOLAR -1 SOLAR -2 SOLAR-3 SOLAR-4 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. PHMS 5 Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240- 1585 (760) 416-6000 (760) 416-600 33 67173 0123703 12795 Original Construction Date 2011 Original Capacity (MP 2012)1,395 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 47 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)18.78 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,367 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 47 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 136,778 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 819 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 0 1,224 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 0 0 0 0 2035 2030 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1000-2000 MAIN BUILDING 1000- 2000 WING Permanent MAIN BUILDING 1000-2000 WING 2013 A# 1093912 2 101730 D 1 B-3000 3000 BUILDING Permanent 3000 BUILDING 2013 A# 1093912 2 26507 D 1 Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 Parking Lot 1 Parking Parking Lot 1 2013 A# 1093912 1 PK-2 Parking Lot 2 Parking Parking Lot 2 2013 A# 1093912 1 PK-3 Parking Lot 3 Parking Parking Lot 3 2013 A# 1093912 1 LS-1 Lunch Shelter Permanent Lunch Shelter 2013 A# 113015 1 Solar-1 South West Parking Lot Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(1 of 4) 2013 A# 113015 PPA 1 Solar-2 South West Parking Lot Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(2 of 4) 2013 A# 113015 PPA 1 Solar-3 South Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(3 of 4) 2013 A# 113015 PPA 1 Solar-4 South Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(4 of 4) 2013 A# 113015 PPA 1 PHMS 6 Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers First Floor Second Floor Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District 2019 PHMS 8 Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B A BN PHMS 9 Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 PHMS 10 Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N BELLA VISTA ELEMENTARY BELLA VISTA ELEMENTARY BVES 1 Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Bella Vista Elementary School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Cover Sheet 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan BVES 2 Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Executive Summary Bella Vista Elementary School (BVES) Vision and Mission The vision and mission of Bella Vista Elementary School is dedicated to creating a college and career-minded community of successful citizens that embrace academic excellence, individual strengths and difference, personal growth and respect for self and others in an ever-changing global system. Neighborhood BVES is located in Desert Hot Springs,a community twelve miles north of Palm Springs,CA. Instruction BVES serves approximately 740 students in grades Transitional Kindergarten through 5th grade.BVES is located in Desert Hot Springs,a community twelve miles north of Palm Springs,California. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,multi- purpose room, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N BVES 3 Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Desert Hot Springs High School 9-12 Desert Springs Middle School 6-8 Painted Hills Middle School 6-8 Bella Vista Elementary School K-5 Bubbling Wells Elementary School K-5 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School K-5 Julius Corsini Elementary School K-5 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 8 Schools BVES 4 Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:13.4 Acres Current Playground Area::6.2 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A P-1 P-2 P-3 B-1A PA-1 PA-2 SS-2 SS-1 LS-1 PK-3 PK-1 PK-2 SOLAR-3 SOLAR-4 SOLAR-5 SOLAR-1 SOLAR-2 B-1B B-1C B-1D B-1E B-1F B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. SOLAR-6 BVES 5 Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-1674 (760) 251-7244 (760) 251-7255 33 67173 6032429 4565 Original Construction Date 2014 Original Capacity Existing Capacity Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 35 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (2017 EMG Reference) 13.38 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,049 (31 Students / Classroom) Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 32 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 81,523 SQ.FT. Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 765 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 3 1,499 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 0 0 0 0 2035 2030 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1A MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MAIN BUILDING:2014 A# 109313 2 83153 S 1 B-1B CLASSROOM WING-1 (1st & 2nd FLOOR)Permanent Food Service 2014 A# 109313 1 -S 1 B-1C LIBRARY Permanent Multi-Purpose 2014 A# 109313 1 -S 1 B-1D ADMINISTRATION (1st & 2nd FLOOR) Permanent Classroom Wing #1 2014 A# 109313 2 -S 1 B-1E CLASSROOM WING-2 (1st & 2nd FLOOR)Permanent Library 2014 A# 109313 1 -S 1 B-1F KINDERGARTEN Permanent Administration 2014 A# 109313 1 -S 1 P-1 RELO 1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM # 130 2017 A# 114694 1 960 1 P-2 RELO 2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM # 131 2017 A# 114694 1 960 1 P-3 RELO 3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM # 132 2017 A# 114694 1 960 1 BVES 6 Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PA-1 Play Area Play Play Area 2014 A# 109313 n/a 3000 1 PA-2 Kinder Play Area Play Kindergarten Play Area 2014 A# 109313 n/a 0 1 PK-1 Staff Parking Parking Staff Parking 2014 A# 109313 n/a 0 1 PK-2 Visitor Parking 1 Parking Visitor Parking 1 2014 A# 109313 n/a 0 1 PK-3 Visitor Parking 2 Parking Visitor Parking 2 2014 A# 109313 n/a 0 1 LS-1 Lunch Shelter Shelter Lunch Shelter 2014 A# 109313 n/a 3000 1 SS-1 Shade Structure Shelter Shade Structure 2014 A# 109313 n/a 3000 1 SS-2 Shade Structure Shelter Shade Structure 2019 A# 117623 n/a 3000 1 Solar-1 Solar Canopy Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) (1 of 6)2015 A# 113535 PPA n/a 0 1 Solar-2 Solar Canopy Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) (2 of 6)2015 A# 113535 PPA 1 Solar-3 Solar Canopy Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) (3 of 6)2015 A# 113535 PPA 1 Solar-4 Solar Canopy Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) (4 of 6)2015 A# 113535 PPA 1 Solar-5 Solar Canopy Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) (5 of 6)2015 A# 113535 PPA 1 Solar-6 Solar Canopy Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) (6 of 6)2015 A# 113535 PPA 1 BVES 7 Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers First Floor Second Floor 130 131 132 BVES 8 Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map 1 23 4 5 6 7 A B A B Image Key 1 N BVES 9 Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 2 4 3 1 6 7 5 BVES 10 Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N BUBBLING WELLS ELEMENTARY BUBBLING WELLS ELEMENTARY Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 BWES 1 PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 Bubbling Wells Elementary School Cover Sheet www.psusd.us Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 BWES 2Executive Summary Executive Summary Bubbling Wells Elementary School (BWES) Mission &Vision Work together as a learning community to support and increase early literacy, mathematical conceptual knowledge, and a desire to continue learning with the help of technology, our teachers, school staff,families,and community. Neighborhood BWES is located in Desert Hot Springs,a community twelve miles north of Palm Springs, California.Located south of the city limits of Desert Hot Springs.The school attendance boundaries include the county areas of Desert Hot Springs east of Palm Drive,west of Mt.View and south of Camino Campanero Instruction BWES serves approximately 750 students in grades Transitional Kindergarten through 5th grade. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,multi-purpose room,kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science N Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 BWES 3Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Desert Hot Springs High School 9-12 Desert Springs Middle School 6-8 Painted Hills Middle School 6-8 Bella Vista Elementary School K-5 Bubbling Wells Elementary School K-5 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School K-5 Julius Corsini Elementary School K-5 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 8 Schools Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 BWES 4Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:12.2 Acres Current Playground Area:6.3 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/AAdjacent Solar Array B-3A B-5A B-6 B-1 B-2 P-8P-7P-6P-5P-4P-3 B-3BB-4B B-4A P-1 P-2 P-9 P-22 P-18P-15P-14P-13P-12P-11P-10 PK-1PK-2 PK-3 P-17P-16P-19P-20LS-1 B-5B P-21 SS-1 SS-2 SS-3 SOLAR-1 SOLAR-2 SOLAR-3 SOLAR-4 SOLAR-5 SOLAR-6 SOLAR-7 SOLAR-8 SOLAR-9 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 BWES 5 LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Existing Campus Asset Summary School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-6869 (760) 251-7230 (760) 251-7237 33 67173 6111025 1025 Original Construction Date 1992 Original Capacity (MP 2012)580 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 41 Projected Enrollment (2020) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)17.99 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,217 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 21 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 51,570 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 712 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 20 686 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 3,335,365 2,223,577 4,990,272 3,326,848 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1 ADMINISTRATION Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1992 A# 52416 1 5690 S 3 B-2 MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1992 A# 52416 1 7186 S 3 B-3A CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 11-13, 21-23 1992 A# 52416 A# 110280 2009 1 2600 S 2 B-3B CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 14-15, 24-25 1992 A# 52416 A# 110280 2009 1 3060 S 2 B-4A CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOM 31-33 1992 A# 52416 1 1260 S 3 B-4B CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 34-36 1992 A# 52416 / A# 110280 1 6120 S 3 B-5A CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-3 1992 A# 52416 / A# 110280 1 3600 S 3 B-5B CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 4-5 1992 A# 52416 1 3060 S 3 B-6 KINDERGARTEN Permanent CLASSROOM K-1-K-2 1992 A# 52416 1 1260 S 3 P-1 RELO 1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 34 1980 A# 47710 1 960 D 4 P-2 RELO 2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 35 1988 A# 50418 1 960 S 4 P-3 RELO 3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 41 1988 A# 50989 1 960 S 4 P-4 RELO 4 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 42 1988 A# 50989 1 960 S 4 P-5 RELO 5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 43 1988 A# 51597 1 960 S 4 P-6 RELO 6 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 44 1988 A# 50585 1 960 S 4 Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 BWES 6 LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Existing Campus Asset Summary Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index P-7 RELO 7 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 45 1988 A# 50585 1 960 S 4 P-8 RELO 8 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 46 1988 A# 50418 1 960 S 4 P-9 RELO 9 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 5 1989 A# 52416 1 960 S 4 P-10 RELO 10 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 51 1990 A# 29638 1 960 D 3 P-11 RELO 11 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 52 1995 A# 102348 1 2120 S 3 P-12 RELO 10 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 53 1998 A# 50418 1 960 S 3 P-13 RELO 11 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 54 1998 A# 50418 1 960 S 3 P-14 RELO 14 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 55 1998 A# 26435 1 960 S 3 P-15 RELO 15 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 56 1998 A# 107810 1 960 S 3 P-16 RELO 16 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 57 1998 A# 108753 1 960 S 3 P-17 RELO 17 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 58 1998 A# 108877 1 960 S 3 P-18 RELO 18 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 59 2015 A# 108877 1 960 S 1 P-19 RELO 19 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 60 2015 A# 113946 1 960 S 1 P-20 RELO 20 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 61 2015 A# 113946 1 960 S 1 P-21 RELO 21 Portable CHILD CARE 1992 A# 52416 1 960 S 3 Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING LOT A PARKING LOT A 2015 A# 114460 1 PK-2 PARKING LOT B PARKING LOT B 1992 A# 52416 3 PK-3 PARKING LOT C PARKING LOT C 2015 A# 114460 1 LS-1 LUNCH Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1992 A# 108435 1 1032 S 3 SS-1 SHADE STRUCT.Shelter SHADE STRUCT.1992 A# 52416 3 SS-2 SHADE STRUCT.Shelter SHADE STRUCT.2010 A# 111048 1 SS-3 SHADE STRUCT.Shelter SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117557 2018 1 Solar-1 Solar Array Solar Panels Solar Array / on adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-2 Solar Array Solar Panels Solar Array / on adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-3 Solar Array Solar Panels Solar Array / on adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-4 Solar Array Solar Panels Solar Array / on adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-5 Solar Array Solar Panels Solar Array / on adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-6 Solar Array Solar Panels Solar Array / on adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-7 Solar Array Solar Panels Solar Array / on adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-8 Solar Array Solar Panels Solar Array / on adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-9 Solar Array Solar Panels Solar Array / on adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 BWES 7Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 BWES 8Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 A B A B N Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 BWES 9Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 BWES 10Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N CABOT YERXA ELEMENTARY CABOT YERXA ELEMENTARY CYES 1 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Cover Sheet Cabot Yerxa Elementary School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan CYES 2 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Executive Summary Cabot Yerxa Elementary School (CYES) Mission The faculty and staff of Cabot Yerxa Elementary School believe each child is a unique, valuable individual who is capable of learning and succeeding. We further believe that the participation, communication,and cooperation with the home and the community at larger are critical for student success in school.Recognizing the special needs of our multicultural,language diverse population,we practice a variety of best practice instructional strategies,all while promoting district and state goals for educational development and facilitating the growth of productive members of our society. Neighborhood CYES is located in Desert Hot Springs, California and serves a diverse population of students and families from the local community. Instruction CYES serves approximately 750 students in grades Transitional Kindergarten through 5th grade. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms, multi-purpose room, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N CYES 3 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Desert Hot Springs High School 9-12 Desert Springs Middle School 6-8 Painted Hills Middle School 6-8 Bella Vista Elementary School K-5 Bubbling Wells Elementary School K-5 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School K-5 Julius Corsini Elementary School K-5 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 8 Schools CYES 4 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:13.0 Acres Current Playground Area:7.1 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A PK-1 PK-3 PK-2 B-K2 SS-1 B-K1 B-L L-S B-C3 B-C2 SS-3 B-C1 B-M SS-2 P-3P-2P-1 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. SOLAR-RT CYES 5 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-4103 (760) 251-2223 (760) 251-3110 33 67173 0118943 12316 Original Construction Date 2009 Original Capacity (MP 2012)651 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 37 Projected Enrollment (2020) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)12.98 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,093 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 34 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 59,000 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 701 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 3 526 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 0 0 0 0 2034 2029 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-M BLDG. 'M' –MULTI- PURPOSE Permanent ADMINISTRATION / MULTI-PURPOSE 2009 A# 108879 1 12541 S 2 B-L BLDG. 'L' –LIBRARY Permanent LIBRARY 2009 A# 108879 1 3802 C 2 B-K1 BLDG. 'K1’ KINDER.Permanent CLASSROOMS 305-308 2009 A# 108879 1 6770 S 2 B-K2 BLDG. 'K2’ KINDER.Permanent CLASSROOMS 301-304 2009 A# 108879 1 6770 S 2 B-C1 BLDG. 'C1' –CLASSROOMS Permanent CLASSROOMS 601-605 2009 A# 108879 1 13165 S 2 B-C2 BLDG. 'C2' –CLASSROOMS Permanent CLASSROOMS 501-508 2009 A# 108879 1 10138 S 2 B-C3 BLDG. 'C3' –CLASSROOMS Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-412 2009 A# 108879 1 5056 S 2 P-1 RELO 1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 701 2016 A# 114738 1 960 1 P-2 RELO 2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 702 2016 A# 114738 1 960 1 P-3 RELO 3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 703 2016 A# 114738 1 960 1 CYES 6 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING LOT 1 PARKING LOT 1 2009 A# 108879 2 PK-2 PARKING LOT 2 PARKING LOT 2 2009 A# 108879 2 PK-1 VISITOR PARKING VISITOR PARKING 2009 A# 108879 2 L-S LUNCH STRUCTURE LUNCH SHELTER 2009 A# 108879 2 SS-1 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCT 2016 A# 114738 1 SS-2 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCT 2016 A# 114738 1 SOLAR-RT SOLAR Solar Panels Solar Panels (Rooftop)2015 A# 113786 PPA 1 SS-3 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117624 2018 1 CYES 7 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers CYES 8 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B A B Image Key 1 N CYES 9 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 CYES 10 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N JULIUS CORSINI ELEMENTARY JULIUS CORSINI ELEMENTARY JCES 1 Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Julius Corsini Elementary School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Cover Sheet JCES 2 Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Julius Corsini Elementary School (JCES) Vision and Mission The collaborative, professional staff of Julius Corsini Elementary School,in partnership with our students, families,and community,will provide a rich,high quality instruction based on the Common CORE standards in a safe, student centered learning environment. Vision Statement: Julius Corsini Elementary School supports a respectful, inclusive and engaging environment where academic achievement and positive social interactions foster confidence, responsibility, and student success. Neighborhood JCES is in Desert Hot springs,a community located in the northwest corner of the Coachella Valley,in southern California. Instruction JCES serves approximately five hundred students in Transitional Kindergarten through Fifth grades and is a technology rich school. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices,classrooms,multi- purpose room, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms,storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N JCES 3 Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Desert Hot Springs High School 9-12 Desert Springs Middle School 6-8 Painted Hills Middle School 6-8 Bella Vista Elementary School K-5 Bubbling Wells Elementary School K-5 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School K-5 Julius Corsini Elementary School K-5 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 8 Schools JCES 4 Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:11.6 Acres Current Playground Area::6.2 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A B-A B-B B-D B-C SS-3 PA-1 PA-2 B-3 PK-2 SS-2 B-5C B-1 LS-1 LS-2 B-E B-2PK-1 B-2 M-HS PA-3 SS-1 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. JCES 5 Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-6551 (760) 251-7260 (760) 251-7263 33 67173 6102560 7810 Original Construction Date 1968 Original Capacity (MP 2012)1,240 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 40 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)9.5 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,178 (31 Students / Classroom) Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 40 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 57,652 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 444 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 1 620 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 1,772,433 1,181,622 2,668,904 1,779,269 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1 ADMINISTRATION Permanent ADMINISTRATION 1993 A# 53209 A# 103921 2005 1 2900 S 2 B-2 LIBRARY Modular MODULAR LIBRARY 2006 A# 107672 1 5300 D 2 B-3 KINDERGARTEN Permanent KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOMS KA-KB 1993 A# 53209 A# 103921 2005 1 2560 S 2 B-5C MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1983 A# 45397 A# 103921 2005 2 188 S 2 B-A CLASSROOM Modular CLASSROOMS 101-105, 201-205 2003 A# 103921 2 10712 S 2 B-B CLASSROOM Modular CLASSROOMS 106-107, 206-207 2003 A# 103921 2 7744 S 2 B-C CLASSROOM Modular CLASSROOMS 108-109, 208-209 2004 A# 105148 2 11712 S 2 B-D CLASSROOM Modular CLASSROOMS 110-115, 210-215 2004 A# 105148 2 1920 S 2 B-E CLASSROOM Modular CLASSROOMS 301-304, 305-308 2006 A# 107672 1 3872 S 2 M-HS SPECIAL PROGRAMS RELO Modular HEAD START 1986 A# 26428 A# 105148 2004 1 1800 S 2 JCES 6 Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING LOT A PARKING LOT A 2003 A# 103921 A# 108845 2007 2 PK-2 PARKING LOT B PARKING LOT B 2003 A# 103921 A# 108845 2007 2 PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2010 A# 111049 1 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2010 A# 111049 1 PA-3 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2010 A# 111049 1 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2003 A# 103921 1 2210 S 2 LS-2 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2003 A# 103921 1 2210 S 2 SS-1 SHADE STRUCT.Shelter SHADE STRUCT.2004 A# 105148 2 SS-2 SHADE STRUCT.Shelter SHADE STRUCT.2010 A# 111049 1 SS-3 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117625 2018 1 JCES 7 Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers Second Floor First Floor Head Start JCES 8 Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A A N JCES 9 Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 2 4 3 1 6 8 7 5 9 JCES 10 Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Ave., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Notes: General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N TWO BUNCH PALMS ELEMENTARY TWO BUNCH PALMS ELEMENTARY TBPES 1 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Cover Sheet Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-7 Existing Campus Asset Summary 8 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 9 Existing Campus Image Key Map 10 Existing Campus Images 11 Campus Aerial & Master Plan TBPES 2 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Two Bunch Palms Elementary School (TBPES) Mission Statement The Two Bunch Palms community will collaboratively prepare children to become life-long learners and contributing members in an ever changing diverse society. The faculty and staff of Two Bunch Palms Elementary affirm their commitment to excellence in education.To fulfill this commitment, we are dedicated to providing learning opportunities for all elementary students in accordance with their needs, backgrounds, interests, and abilities.In our school program we strive to provide a balanced curriculum emphasizing academic and social growth. We provide the opportunity for the students to have their needs met as they develop individual abilities.The culmination of our efforts is to instill in our students a lifelong love of learning. Neighborhood TBPES is located in Desert Hot Springs, California serving a diverse student population in the northwestern portion of the Coachella Valley. Instruction TBPES opened in August, 1998 and has a current enrollment of approximately 875 students.The educational program serves students in Kindergarten through fifth grade.It has additional programs for Transitional Kindergarten and students with Special Education needs. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices,classrooms,multi- purpose room,kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N TBPES 3 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Desert Hot Springs High School 9-12 Desert Springs Middle School 6-8 Painted Hills Middle School 6-8 Bella Vista Elementary School K-5 Bubbling Wells Elementary School K-5 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School K-5 Julius Corsini Elementary School K-5 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 8 Schools TBPES 4 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:11.9 Acres Current Playground Area::6.2 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A PK-1PK-2 PK-3 M-6 P-14 M-K B-1B-2 P-HS M-HS SS-2 PA-1 SS-3 PK-4 P-14 P-13 P-12 P-11 P-10 P-9 M-7 PA-5 M-5A M-5B M-3B M-3A M-4A M-4B SS-4 PA-2 PA-4 SS-1 PA-3 P-8 P-7 M-RR P-6 P-5 P-4 P-3 SOLAR-1 SOLAR-2 SOLAR-3 SOLAR-4 SOLAR-5 SOLAR-6 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. TBPES 5 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-5655 (760) 251-7220 (760) 251-7272 33 67173 6115448 7602 Original Construction Date 1998 Original Capacity (MP 2012)806 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 43 Projected Enrollment (2020) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)11.95 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,261 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 30 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 43,670 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 807 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 13 1,042 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as- built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 0 0 0 0 2022 N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1 BLDG. '1' ADMIN.Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1998 A# 65937 1 5963 S 3 B-2 BLDG. '2' MULTI- PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1998 A# 65937 1 7579 S 3 M-3A BLDG. '3A' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 10-12 / 20-22 1998 A# 65937 1 6180 S 3 M-3B BLDG. '3B' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 13-14 / 23-24 1998 A# 65937 1 3600 S 3 M-5A BLDG. '5A' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 30-32 1998 A# 65937 1 3090 S 3 M-5B BLDG. '5B' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 33-35 1998 A# 65937 1 3275 S 3 M-7 BLDG. '7' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 40-42 1998 A# 65937 1 2920 S 3 M-6 BLDG. '6' KINDERGARTEN Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS K1-K2 2005 A# 107711 / A# 65937 1 2784 S 2 M-K BLDG. 'K' KINDER.Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS K3-K4 / 103 2005 A# 105371 1 3480 S 2 M-HS HEAD START Modular HEAD START MODULAR 1998 A# 110728 1 1920 S 3 M-RR RESTROOM Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS 2004 A# 113945 1 144 S 2 M-4A BLGD. '4A'Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 1-3 1998 A# 65937 1 3 M-4B BLGD. '4B'Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 4-6 1998 A# 65937 1 3 TBPES 6 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index P-HS RELO HEADSTART BLDG. Portable HEAD START PORTABLE 1986 A# 115027 1 1360 D 4 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P3 2004 A# 101984 1 960 S 2 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P4 2004 A# 104946 1 960 D 2 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P5 2004 A# 104946 1 960 D 2 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P6 2004 A# 108107 1 960 S 2 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P7 2004 A# 108107 1 960 S 2 P-8 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P8 2004 A# 51282 1 960 D 2 P-9 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 43 1998 A# 102902 1 960 D 3 P-10 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 44 2003 A# 105266 1 960 D 2 P-11 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 45 2000 A# 108107 1 960 S 2 P-12 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 46 2000 A# 108107 1 960 S 2 P-13 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 47 2000 A# 108107 1 960 S 2 P-14 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 48 2001 A# 102346 1 960 S 2 P-15 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOMS K6 2016 A# 115026 1 1200 1 TBPES 7 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING A PARKING A 2018 A# 117197 1 PK-2 PARKING B PARKING B 2018 A# 117197 1 PK-3 PARKING C PARKING C 2015 A# 110728 1 PK-4 PARKING PARKING D 2018 A# 117197 1 PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (1 of 5)2013 A# 113024 1 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (2 of 5)2013 A# 113024 1 PA-3 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (3 of 5)2013 A# 113024 1 PA-4 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (4 of 5)2013 A# 113024 1 PA-5 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (5 of 5)2013 A# 113024 1 SS-1 SHADE STRUCTURE Shelter LUNCH SHELTER (1 of 2)2014 A# 113644 1 2400 S 1 SS-2 SHADE STRUCTURE Shelter LUNCH SHELTER (2 of 2)2014 A# 113644 1 SS-3 SHADE STRUCTURE Shelter SHADE STRUCTURE 2004 A# 105371 2 SS-4 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117626 2018 1 Solar-1 SOLAR ARRAY Solar SOLAR ARRAY -(1 of 6) In adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-2 SOLAR ARRAY Solar SOLAR ARRAY -(2 of 6) In adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-3 SOLAR ARRAY Solar SOLAR ARRAY -(3 of 6) In adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-4 SOLAR ARRAY Solar SOLAR ARRAY -(4 of 6) In adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-5 SOLAR ARRAY Solar SOLAR ARRAY -(5 of 6) In adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 Solar-6 SOLAR ARRAY Solar SOLAR ARRAY -(6 of 6) In adjacent lot 2015 Exemption Filed DO 1 TBPES 8 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers Head Start Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District 2019 TBPES 10 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1N 1 2 3 4 5 6 A A TBPES 11 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 TBPES 12 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Drive, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 N Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. PALM SPRINGSHIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARY2.3 PALM SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARY2.3 PALM SPRINGS HIGH PALM SPRINGS HIGH Palm Springs High School 2401 Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSHS 1Cover PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.PSUSD.us Page Contents 1 Cover 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Map 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Palm Springs High School Palm Springs High School 2401 Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSHS 2Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •English I, II, III, IV, Honors, AP •Art I, II, III •ERWC •Theater I, II, III •Mathematics, I,II,III, Honors •Emerging LIt •Pre Calc •Spanish I, II, III, AP •Calc AP •French I, II, III, IV, AP •Stats, AP •AVID •Weights, Adv •BAND •PE Sports •Tech I, II •Dance I, II •Journalism, Beg, Adv •Aerobics •Edgenuity •ASB 1 Pre Leadership 1 •Public Speaking •Earth Sci •World History •Biology, Honors, AP •Ethnic Studies •Chemistry, Honors, AP •Yearbook •Physics I, II, AP •Chambers •Psychology, AP •Wind •World History •Concert Band •AP Euro •Music I,II •US History •Video Production •Lifetime Sports •Business MMM Academy •Civ/Econ •Sports Medicine •Gov Econ Honors, AP •Welding •Percussion/Orchestra •Business MMM Academy •Chorale Academies: •Art Institute •Manufacturing & Welding Pathway •Academy of Business Leadership and Entrepreneurship (ABLE) •Palm Springs Academy for Learning Medicine (PALM) Executive Summary Palm Springs High School (PSHS) Vision and Mission Palm Springs High School’s mission is to prepare students to assume responsible adult roles as citizens,family members, workers, and lifelong learners by providing for their intellectual and developmental needs. Neighborhood PSHS is located in Palm Springs,California and serves students in the communities of Palm Springs and North Palm Springs. Instruction PSHS offers a comprehensive high school program serving approximately 1700 students in grades ninth through twelfth.All students receive a strong academic curriculum with an emphasis on career preparation.Also offered are career pathways in welding and computer assisted manufacturing, business and Allied Health Services. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,athletic facilities,assembly areas, performing arts center, cafeteria, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms,storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. N Palm Springs High School 2401 Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSHS 3Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Palm Springs High School 9-12 Raymond Cree Middle School 6-8 Cahuilla Elementary School K-5 Cielo Vista Charter School K-8 Katherine Finchy Elementary School K-8 Vista Del Monte Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools Palm Springs High School 2401 Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSHS 4Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:47.56 Acres Current Athletic Fields::N/A Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. PK-2 PK-2 B-C B-A B-B B-D B-E B-G B-F B-HB-M B-AUD B-Q B-L B-S B-K B-PE B-J B-J-RR B-T B-N-1 B-N-2 LS-1 LS-2 SS-1 WW-2SOLAR-1SOLAR-2SOLAR-3SOLAR-4SOLAR-5SOLAR-6SOLAR-7SOLAR-8SOLAR-9SOLAR-10SOLAR-11SOLAR-12B-GS-H B-GS-V B-DO-S1 B-DO-S3 B-DO-B3 B-DO-B1 B-600 B-PB B-CB Palm Springs High School 2401 Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSHS 5Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Palm Springs High School 2401 East Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262-7217 (760) 778-0400 (760) 778-0481 33 67173 3335130 4569 Original Construction Date 1948 Original Capacity (MP 2012)2,170 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 77 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)47.56 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 2,297 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 77 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 247,902 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 1,659 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 0 1,053 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 2,299,858 1,533,239 3,380,312 2,253,541 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-C BUILDING C Permanent ADMINISTRATION 1997 A# 62054 1 10150 D 3 B-A BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 201-250 1997 A# 62054 1 36654 D 3 B-B BUILDING B Permanent CLASSROOMS 301-303 1997 A# 62054 1 5075 D 3 B-D BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-410 1997 A# 62054 1 12475 D 3 B-E BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOM 500 BUILDING 1997 A# 62054 1 3460 D 3 B-G BUILDING G Permanent CLASSROOMS 601-609 1997 A# 62054 1 13821 D 3 B-F BUILDING F Permanent CLASSROOMS 701-706 1997 A# 62054 1 13078 D 3 B-H BUILDING H Permanent CLASSROOMS 801-808 1999 A# 62054 1 15846 D 3 B-M BUILDING M Permanent MUSIC BUILDING 1955 A# 15188 A# 102161 1999 1 7989 D 3 B-AUD AUDITORIUM Permanent RICHARDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS AUDITORIUM 1958 A# 15188 A# 113724 2015 1 18648 B 1 B-Q BLACK BOX THEATER Permanent BLACK BOX THEATER 1997 A# 62054 1 3337 D 3 B-PA PERFORMING ARTS BUILDING Permanent PERFORMING ARTS BUILDING 2010 A# 111214 2 8000 1 B-L BUILDING L Permanent LIBRARY 1958 A# 18535 1 7213 C 5 B-S BUILDING S Permanent ASB CLASSROOMS / STUDENT STORE 1948 A# 47394 1 4061 B 5 B-K BUILDING K Permanent CAFETERIA / MULTI-PURPOSE 1948 A# 47394 1 9447 B 5 B-PE P.E. BUILDING Permanent PE LOCKER ROOMS 1999 A# 62054 1 15331 D 3 B-J GYMNASIUM Permanent PAUL SUMMERS GYMNASIUM 1975 A# 62054 1 23104 B 5 B-J-RR BUILDING J RR Permanent GYM RESTROOM BUILDING 1997 A# 62054 1 884 D 3 B-T QUAD TOWER Permanent QUAD TOWER 1999 A# 62054 3 361 D 3 B-N-1 RESTROOM Permanent QUAD RESTROOM BUILDING (BY 200'S)1999 A# 62054 1 966 D 3 B-N-2 RESTROOM Permanent QUAD RESTROOM BUILDING (BY 700'S)1999 A# 62054 1 966 D 3 Palm Springs High School 2401 Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSHS 6Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-DO-B1 DUGOUT Permanent BASEBALL 1B DUGOUT 1997 A# 104897 1 473 C 3 B-DO-B2 DUGOUT Permanent BASEBALL 3B DUGOUT 1997 A# 104897 1 806 C 3 B-DO-S1 DUGOUT Permanent SOFTBALL 1B DUGOUT 1997 A# 104897 1 473 C 3 B-DO-S3 DUGOUT Permanent SOFTBALL 3B DUGOUT 1997 A# 104897 1 806 C 3 B-GS-H GRANDSTANDS Permanent HOME GRANDSTANDS 1964 1 11440 B 5 B-GS-V GRANDSTANDS Permanent VISITOR GRANDSTANDS 1964 1 5213 B 5 B-600 BUILDING 600 Permanent CLASSROOMS 900-904 1968 A# 14469 A# 102161 1999 5 B-RR RESTROOM Permanent MODULAR RESTROOM BUILDING 2019 A# 115641 1 B-FB FIELD BUILDING Permanent FOOTBALL TEAM ROOM BUILDING 100 2015 A# 113346 1 B-CB CONCESSIONS Permanent CONCESSION BUILDING 200 2015 A# 113346 1 Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 STUDENT PARKING STUDENT PARKING 1997 A# 62054 3 PK-2 STAFF PARKING STAFF PARKING 1997 A# 62054 3 SS-1 BUILDING R Permanent SHOP SHELTER 1997 A# 62054 1 2280 S 3 LS-2 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1997 A# 62054 1 2752 D 3 LS-1 BUILDING K Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1997 A# 62054 1 1912 D 3 WW-1 WALKWAY Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1997 A# 62054 1 11088 S 3 WW-2 ENTRANCE Walkway ENTRANCE / GATE CANOPIES 1997 A# 62054 1 2310 D 3 SOLAR-1 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(1 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-2 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(2 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-3 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(3 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-4 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(4 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-5 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(5 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-6 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(6 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-7 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(7 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-8 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(8 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-9 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(9 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-10 South East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(13 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-11 South East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(14 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 SOLAR-12 South East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(15 of 15)2014 A# 112853 PPA 1 MARQUEE Marquee Sign Marquee Sign 2018 A# 116382 Palm Springs High School 2401 Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSHS 7Existing Campus Use Plan With Room Numbers First Floor Second Floor Palm Springs High School 2401 Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSHS 8Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 A B 1 2 3 4 5 67 A B C C N Palm Springs High School 2401 Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSHS 9Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Palm Springs High School 2401 Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSHS 10Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N RAYMOND CREE MIDDLE RAYMOND CREE MIDDLE RCMS 1 Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Raymond Cree Middle School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Map 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Cover Sheet RCMS 2 Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Raymond Cree Middle School (RCMS) Vision Raymond Cree Middle School (RCMS)is an exemplary middle school that provides rigorous educational programs in a safe environment that embraces diversity and cultivate a culture of collaboration among all stakeholders –resulting in a well-rounded young adolescents who are ready for the demands of high school. Mission Raymond Cree Middle School prepares young adolescent students for high school by equipping them with the social and academic skills needed to succeed. Neighborhood RCMS is newer school located in the City if Desert Hot Springs, California serving students from Desert Hot Springs, Whitewater, Painted Hills,North Palm Springs, and Sky Valley. Instruction RCMS serves approximately 800 students in sixth,seventh, and eighth grade. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,multi-purpose room,kitchen and supporting restrooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Language Arts •Mathematics, Honors •Science •Social Studies, Honors •ELA Honors •History, Honors •Ecology •Band, Beg, Adv •Intro to Theater •Life Skills •Adaptive PE •Art, Beg, Int, Adv •Choir I,II •Robotics •Life Skills •ASB •Exploratory •Language Arts •Mathematics, Honors •Science •Social Studies, Honors N RCMS 3 Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Palm Springs High School 9-12 Raymond Cree Middle School 6-8 Cahuilla Elementary School K-5 Cielo Vista Charter School K-8 Katherine Finchy Elementary School K-8 Vista Del Monte Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools RCMS 4 Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:25.0 Acres Current Playground Area::14.0 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A PK-2 PK-2 PK-3 BUS-1 B-100,200,300,400 RCOE B-500 B-600 B-800B-700 B-900 SOLAR-1 SOLAR-2 SOLAR-3 SOLAR-4 SOLAR-5 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. RCMS 5 Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262-3207 (760) 416-8283 (760) 416-8287 33 67173 6059109 4564 Original Construction Date 1965 Original Capacity (MP 2012)992 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 48 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)25 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,416 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 48 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 125,806 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 855 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 0 769 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 0 0 0 0 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B- 100,200,300,400 MAIN ACADEMICS ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Permanent ADMINISTRATION / CLASSROOMS 201-318 / LIBRARY 1011 1968 A# 27116 A# 64253 / 67871 1997 1 57162 S 3 RCOE RCOE -400 BLDG Permanent 400 BUILDING -COE / MEDICAL THERAPY UNIT 1980 N/A A# 64253 / 67871 1997 1 11000 D 3 B-500 500 BLDG Permanent 500 BUILDING -MULTI-PURPOSE / CLASSROOMS 1968 A# 64253 A# 64253 / 67871 1997 1 21775 S 3 B-600 600 BLDG Permanent 600 BUILDING -CLASSROOMS 1968 A# 27116 A# 64253 / 67871 1997 1 6588 S 3 B-800 GYMNASIUM Permanent GYMNASIUM / STAGE 1968 A# 61120 A#114106 2016 1 17991 C 3 B-700 MUSIC BUILDING Permanent MUSIC BUILDING / STAGE SHELTER 1968 A# 27116 A# 64253 / 67871 1997 1 11340 C 3 B-900 900 BUILDING Permanent 900 BUILDING -CLASSROOMS 2017 A# 114233 1 RCMS 6 Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING 1 PARKING PARKING 1968 A# 27116 A#114106 2016 1 PK-2 PARKING 2 PARKING PARKING 1968 A# 27116 A#114106 2016 1 PK-3 PARKING 3 PARKING PARKING 1968 A# 27116 A#114106 2016 1 BUS-1 BUS DROP-OFF BUS DROP-OFF BUS DROP-OFF 1968 A# 27116 A#114106 2016 1 Solar-1 At North West Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(1 of 5) 2015 A# 113545 PPA 1 Solar-2 At North West Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(2 of 5) 2015 A# 113545 PPA 1 Solar-3 At South West Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) -(3 of 5) 2015 A# 113545 PPA 1 Solar-4 At South Play Area Solar Panels Solar Panel (Play Area) -(4 of 5)2015 A# 113545 PPA 1 Solar-5 At South Play Area Solar Panels Solar Panel (Play Area) -(5 of 5)2015 A# 113545 PPA 1 WW-1 Walkway Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1968 A# 27116 1 10960 S 5 RCMS 7 Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers Second Floor First Floor RCMS 8 Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B A B N RCMS 9 Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RCMS 10 Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N CAHUILLA ELEMENTARY CAHUILLA ELEMENTARY CES 1 Cahuilla Elementary School 833 Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Cahuilla Elementary School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Cover Sheet www.planPSUSD.org 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan CES 2 Cahuilla Elementary School 833 Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Executive Summary Cahuilla Elementary School (CES) Mission At Cahuilla Elementary School we believe all students can learn;therefore,we are committed to high expectations for all students,staff,and families. Neighborhood CES is located in Palm Springs, California and serves students in the communities of Palm Springs and North Palm Springs. Instruction CES serves approximately 538 students in grades kindergarten through fifth. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,multi-purpose room,assembly areas, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N CES 3 Cahuilla Elementary School 833 Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Palm Springs High School 9-12 Raymond Cree Middle School 6-8 Cahuilla Elementary School K-5 Cielo Vista Charter School K-8 Katherine Finchy Elementary School K-8 Vista Del Monte Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools CES 4 Cahuilla Elementary School 833 Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:7.7 acres Current Playground Area::N/A Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A PK-1 M-9 M-7M-8 M-10 B-3 B-4 B-2 B-4 SS-1 SS-3 SS-2 B-7 M-4 M-3 M-1M-2 P-6 P-5 B-5 M-11 SS-4 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. CES 5 Cahuilla Elementary School 833 Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Cahuilla Elementary School 833 East Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264-8414 (760) 325-8161 (760) 416-8164 33 67173 6032395 4560 Original Construction Date 2001 Original Capacity (MP 2012)650 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 31 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)7.7 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 889 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 21 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 54,933 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 525 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 11 184 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-2 BLDG '2' -ADMIN. / LIBRARY Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 2002 A# 100352 1 6196 S 2 B-3 BLDG '3' -MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 2002 A# 100352 1 6513 S 2 B-4 BLDG '4' -CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOM 12-14, 20-23 2002 A# 100352 1 408 S 2 B-4 BLDG '4' -CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOM 12-15, 24-26 2002 A# 100352 1 2770 S 2 B-5 KINDERGARTEN Permanent CLASSROOMS K1-K2 2002 A# 100352 2 11376 S 2 B-7 BLDG '7' -CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-3 2002 A# 100352 2 10793 S 2 M-1 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P5 1999 A# 101533 1 960 S 3 M-2 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P7 1999 A# 101533 1 960 S 3 M-3 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P4 1999 A# 101533 1 960 S 3 M-4 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P6 1999 A# 101533 1 960 S 3 M-7 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P17 1999 A# 101533 1 960 S 3 M-8 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P19 1999 A# 101533 1 960 S 3 M-9 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P16 1999 A# 101533 1 960 S 3 M-10 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P18 1999 A# 101533 1 960 S 3 M-11 RELO-ECE Modular CLASSROOM 1999 A# 100352 1 1440 D 3 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P-1 2002 A# 105145 1 960 S 2 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P-2 2002 A# 105145 1 960 S 2 CES 6 Cahuilla Elementary School 833 Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING PARKING 2002 A# 100352 2 SS-1 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2002 A# 100352 1 2813 S 2 SS-2 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2002 A# 100352 2 SS-3 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2002 A# 100352 2 SS-4 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117687 2018 1 CES 7 Cahuilla Elementary School 833 Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers Second Floor First Floor CES 8 Cahuilla Elementary School 833 Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B Image Key 1 N A B CES 9 Cahuilla Elementary School 833 Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 2 4 3 1 6 8 7 5 9 Existing Campus Images CES 10 Cahuilla Elementary School 833 Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements.N CIELO VISTA ELEMENTARY CIELO VISTA ELEMENTARY CVCS 1 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Cielo Vista Charter School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Cover Sheet Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-7 Existing Campus Asset Summary 8 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 9 Existing Campus Image Key Map 10 Existing Campus Images 11 Campus Aerial & Master Plan CVCS 2 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Cielo Vista Charter School (CVCS) Mission &Vision Work together as a learning community to support and increase early literacy, mathematical conceptual knowledge, and a desire to continue learning with the help of technology, our teachers, school staff,families, and community. Neighborhood CVCS is located in Desert Hot Springs,a community twelve miles north of Palm Springs,California. Instruction CVCS serves approximately 750 students in grades Transitional Kindergarten through 5th grade. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms, multi-purpose room,kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N CVCS 3 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Palm Springs High School 9-12 Raymond Cree Middle School 6-8 Cahuilla Elementary School K-5 Cielo Vista Charter School K-8 Katherine Finchy Elementary School K-8 Vista Del Monte Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools CVCS 4 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:8.4 Acres Current Playground Area::3.5 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 P-9 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 P-16 P-17P-18P-19P-20P-21 SS-3 PK-1 PA-3 PA-1 B-L LS-3LS-1 LS-1 SS-1 PA-2 B-K B-A B-C B-D B-E B-G B-B B-F M-SE WW-1 FL-1 FL-2 P-HS SS-2 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. CVCS 5 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Cielo Vista Charter School 650 South Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264-1406 (760) 416-8250 (760) 416-8253 33 67173 6032411 4562 Original Construction Date 1955 Original Capacity (MP 2012)248 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 36 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)8.34 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,098 (31 Students / Classrooms)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 17 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 60,825 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 900 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 19 184 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 2,285,555 1,523,703 3,290,425 2,193,617 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-A BLDG. 'A'Permanent ADMINISTRATION 1955 A# 61187 A# 69867 1997 1 3280 D 3 B-C BLDG. 'C'Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1955 A# 61187 A# 69867 1997 1 4690 D 3 B-B BLDG. 'B'Permanent LIBRARY / PSYCHOLOGY 1955 A# 61187 A# 69867 1997 1 3613 D 3 B-D BLDG. 'D'Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-4 / RR 1955 A# 61187 A# 69867 1997 1 5834 D 3 B-E BLDG. 'E'Permanent CLASSROOMS 5-8 / RR 1955 A# 61187 A# 69867 1997 1 5834 D 3 B-F BLDG. 'F'Permanent CLASSROOMS 9-10 1955 A# 61187 A# 69867 1997 1 2405 S 3 B-G BLDG. 'G'Permanent CLASSROOMS 11-14 1955 A# 61187 A# 69867 1997 1 4778 S 3 B-L COMMUNITY CHILD CARE CENTER Permanent CIELO VISTA COMMUNITY CHILD CARE CENTER 1980 A# 69867 1997 1 5053 D 3 CVCS 6 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE B-K BLDG. 'K'Permanent KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOMS 1995 A# 61187 A# 69867 1997 1 3108 D 3 P-HS HEAD START RELO Portable HEADSTART PORTABLE 14 1998 1 960 D 3 M-SE RELO Modular SPECIAL EDUCATION MODULAR RM 15/15A 1984 A# 45654 A# 69867 1997 1 1280 S 3 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 16 1997 A# 61187 1 960 S 3 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 17 1997 A# 57293 1 960 D 3 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 18 1997 A# 57293 1 960 S 3 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 19 1997 A# 51282 1 960 D 3 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 20 1997 A# 50418 1 960 S 3 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 21 1997 A# 50989 1 960 S 3 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 22 1997 A# 51282 1 960 D 3 P-8 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 23 1997 A# 51282 1 960 D 3 P-9 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 28 1997 A# 50418 1 960 S 3 P-10 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 29 2003 A# 102347 1 960 S 2 P-11 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 30 2003 A# 102347 1 960 S 2 P-12 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 24 1997 A# 68435 1 960 S 3 P-13 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 25 1997 A# 68435 1 960 S 3 P-14 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 26 1997 A# 68435 1 960 S 3 P-15 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 27 1997 A# 68435 1 960 S 3 P-16 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 31 2015 A# 114172 1 960 S 1 P-17 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 32 2015 A# 114172 1 960 1 P-18 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 33 2015 A# 114172 1 960 1 P-19 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 34 2015 A# 114172 1 960 1 P-20 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 35 2015 A# 114172 1 960 1 P-21 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 36 / 36A 2015 A# 114172 1 1440 1 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index CVCS 7 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 1955 A# 61187 A# 112524 2012 1 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 1955 A# 61187 A# 112524 2012 1 PA-3 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 1955 A# 61187 A# 112524 2012 1 PK-1 PARKING LOT PARKING LOT 1955 A# 61187 5 FL-1 FIRE LANE FIRE LANE 1955 A# 61187 5 FL-2 FIRE LANE FIRE LANE 1955 A# 61187 5 WW-1 Passage Passage COVERED WALKWAYS 1995 A# 61187 1 12000 D 3 SS-1 Shelter Shelter SHADE STRUCTURE 2001 A# 102275 2000 2 LS-1 Shelter Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS 2009 A# 108434 2006 1 1942 S 2 LS-2 Shelter Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS 2009 A# 108434 2006 1 1942 S 2 LS-3 Shelter Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS 2009 A# 108434 2006 1 1942 S 2 SS-3 Shelter Shelter SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117691 2018 1 SS-2 Shelter Shelter SHADE STRUCTURE 2018 1 CVCS 8 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 24 25 26 272930 31 3233343536/ 36 A 14 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District 2019 CVCS 10 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9A A1011 N CVCS 11 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 8 CVCS 12 Cielo Vista Charter School 650 Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 New Secure Entrance, Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. 3 Systems Upgrades: Site Lighting 4 Systems Upgrades:Fire Alarm 6 ADA Upgrades: Path of Travel N KATHERINE FINCHY ELEMENTARY KATHERINE FINCHY ELEMENTARY KFES 1 Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 E Tachavah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Katherine Finchy Elementary School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Cover Sheet KFES 2 Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 E Tachavah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Katherine Finchy Elementary School (KFES) Mission &Vision Katherine Finchy Elementary School’s mission is to provide a safe and orderly environment, dedicated to helping every child meet rigorous state standards and reach their maximum potential. Neighborhood The school is located in Palm Springs,CA.,in an established neighborhood that was created in the 1930s and 40s,known as the “Movie Colony.”The school’s namesake was an educational pioneer who came to teach in this desert community in 1921. Instruction The school serves approximately 750 students in grades Transitional Kindergarten through 5th grade.All stakeholders, including parents,staff and administrators are dedicated to meeting the needs of each individual student to promote the achievement of maximum potential.The school’s staff adapts instruction through research-based instructional strategies to meet the diverse student needs. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices,classrooms, multi-purpose room, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces.The original school was dedicated in 1951,but a new award- winning building was dedicated in 1998. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N KFES 3 Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 E Tachavah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Palm Springs High School 9-12 Raymond Cree Middle School 6-8 Cahuilla Elementary School K-5 Cielo Vista Charter School K-8 Katherine Finchy Elementary School K-8 Vista Del Monte Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools KFES 4 Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 E Tachavah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Site Information Totals Current Site Area:11.0 Acres Current Playground Area::4.4 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A Existing Campus Asset Plan P-8 P-9 PA-3 PA-2 PA-1 SS-4 B-6 PK-1 PK-2 P-1 B-3 LS-1 SS-2 SS-1 SS-3 P-7 P-6 LS-2 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 SS-5 B-5C B-5C B-1 B-4A B-5B B-5B B-7 SOLAR-1 SOLAR-2 SOLAR-3 B-8 B-8 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. KFES 5 Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 E Tachavah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 East Tachevah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262-4903 (760) 416-8190 (760) 416-8201 33 67173 6032437 4567 Original Construction Date 1998 Original Capacity (MP 2012)806 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 34 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)11 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 924 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 26 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 57,185 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 655 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 8 323 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as- built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 0 0 0 0 2022 N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-2 BLDG. '2'Permanent ADMINISTRATION 1999 A# 63098 A# 114659 2016 1 6284 D 1 B-3 BLDG. '3'Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1999 A# 63098 A# 114659 2016 1 7140 D 1 B-4A BLDG. '4A'Permanent CLASSROOMS 201-208 1999 A# 63098 1 10124 D 3 B-5B BLDG. '5B'Permanent CLASSROOMS 301-308 1999 A# 63098 1 8935 D 3 B-5C BLDG. '5C'Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-408 1999 A# 63098 1 8935 D 3 B-6 BLDG. '7'Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING 1999 A# 63098 1 1118 D 3 B-7 BLDG. '8'Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING -PLAYGROUND 1999 A# 63098 1 881 D 3 B-8 BLDG. '3'Permanent LUNCH SHADE RESTROOM BUILDING 1999 A# 63098 1 3969 D 3 P-1 RELO Portable HEADSTART PORTABLE 1998 A# 100132 1 960 D 3 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 906 1989 A# 54490 1 960 S 4 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 905 1998 A# 101580 1 960 S 3 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 904 1998 A# 101580 1 960 S 3 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 905 1998 A# 101580 1 960 S 3 KFES 6 Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 E Tachavah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 906 1998 A# 101580 1 960 S 3 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 907 1998 A# 52493 1 960 S 3 P-8 RELO K1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM KINDERGARTEN (605)2016 A# 114659 1 1440 1 P-9 RELO K2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM KINDERGARTEN (606)2016 A# 114659 1 1440 1 Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING PARKING 2018 A# 117199 1 PK-2 PARKING PARKING 2018 A# 117199 1 PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2011 A# 111048 1 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2011 A# 111048 1 PA-3 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2011 A# 111048 1 SS-1 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCTURES (1 of 3)2007 A# 109025 2100 2 SS-2 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCTURES (2 of 3)2007 A# 109025 2 SS-3 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCTURES (3 of 3)2007 A# 109025 2 SS-4 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCT 2011 A# 111048 1 LS-1 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (1 of 2)1999 A# 63098 1 3036 D 3 LS-2 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (2 of 2)1999 A# 63098 3 WW-1 Walkway Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1999 A# 63098 1 7477 S 3 SS-5 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117692 2018 1 Solar-1 Solar-1 Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) 2015 A# 114259 PPA 1 Solar-2 Solar-2 Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) 2015 A# 114259 PPA 1 Solar-3 Solar-3 Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking) 2015 A# 114259 PPA 1 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index KFES 7 Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 E Tachavah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers KFES 8 Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 E Tachavah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A Image Key 1 A KFES 9 Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 E Tachavah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KFES 10 Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 E Tachavah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. VISTA DEL MONTE ELEMENTARY VISTA DEL MONTE ELEMENTARY VDMES 1 Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Vista Del Monte Elementary School 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Cover Sheet Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan VDMES 2 Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Vista Del Monte Elementary School (VDMES) Vision and Mission Vista Del Monte Elementary School’s mission is to prepare students to assume responsible adult roles as citizens,family members, workers, and lifelong learners by providing for their intellectual and developmental needs. Neighborhood VDMES is located in Palm Springs, California and serves students in the communities of Palm Springs and North Palm Springs. Instruction VDMS offers a comprehensive high school program serving approximately 1700 students in grades ninth through twelfth.All students receive a strong academic curriculum with an emphasis on career preparation.Also offered are career pathways in welding and computer assisted manufacturing, business and Allied Health Services. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,athletic facilities,assembly areas, performing arts center, cafeteria, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms,storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N VDMES 3 Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Palm Springs High School 9-12 Raymond Cree Middle School 6-8 Cahuilla Elementary School K-5 Cielo Vista Charter School K-8 Katherine Finchy Elementary School K-8 Vista Del Monte Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools VDMES 4 Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:7.2 acres Current Playground Area::N/A Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A P-6 P-5 P-4 P-3 P-2 P-1 M-4 M-3 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-1 SS-1 LS-1 P-8 P-7 M-2 M-1 B-5 PK-2 PK-1 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. B-9 VDMES 5 Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 North Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262-2274 (760) 416-8176 (760) 416-8178 33 67173 6032452 4571 Original Construction Date 1963 Original Capacity (MP 2012)341 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 31 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)7.2 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 925 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 27 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 48,594 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 545 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 9 740 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60% District Share @40% Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as- built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 1,549,376 1,032,918 2,345,329 1,563,553 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building # Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1 BLDG. 'D' ADMIN.Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY / MULTIPURPOSE 1963 A# 61286 A# 66569 1996 1 9136 S 3 B-6 BLDG. 'B'Permanent CLASSROOM K-1 1963 A# 61286 A# 66569 1996 1 1813 S 3 B-5 BLDG. 'A'Permanent CLASSROOM K-2 1994 A# 58742 / 61286 1 1472 S 3 B-4 BLDG. 'C'Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-5 1963 A# 61286 A# 66569 1996 1 5676 S 3 B-2 BLDG. 'E'Permanent CLASSROOMS 6-10 1963 A# 61286 A# 66569 1996 1 5676 S 3 M-1 MODULAR Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 11-12 1974 A# 36360 A# 66569 1996 1 1920 S 3 M-2 MODULAR Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 13-14 1978 A# 40643 A# 66569 1996 1 1920 S 3 M-3 MODULAR Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 15-17 1972 A# 34265 A# 66569 1996 1 2896 S 3 M-4 MODULAR Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 18-21 1974 A# 40643 / 54968 / 58985 A# 66569 1996 1 3840 S 3 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 22 1988 A# 51318 1 960 S 4 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 29 1989 A# 54968 1 960 D 4 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 23 1990 A# 53739 / 62298 1 960 D 3 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 24 1989 A# 51283 / 61286 1 960 D 4 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 25 1988 A# 50418 1 960 S 4 VDMES 6 Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 26 1988 A# 50418 1 960 S 4 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 33 2000 A# 102347 1 960 S 2 P-8 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 34 2000 A# 102347 1 960 S 2 P-9 RELO Portable PORTABLE RESTROOM KINDERGARTEN 2016 A# 114693 1 480 1 Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building # Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING LOT PARKING LOT A 1963 A# 61286 / 111049 5 PK-2 PARKING LOT PARKING LOT B 1963 A# 61286 5 LS-1 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1974 A# 58052 / 61286 1 1536 S 5 WW-1 WALKWAY Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1963 A# 61286 1 1500 S 5 SS-1 SHELTER Shelter SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117559 2018 1 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index VDMES 7 Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers VDMES 8 Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B Image Key 1 A B N VDMES 9 Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 VDMES 10 Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements.N RANCHO MIRAGEHIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARY2.4 RANCHO MIRAGE HIGH SCHOOL BOUNDARY2.4 RANCHO MIRAGE HIGH RANCHO MIRAGE HIGH Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 RMHS 1Cover Sheet PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.PSUSD.us Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Rancho Mirage High School Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 RMHS 2Executive Summary Executive Summary Rancho Mirage High School Mission The mission of Rancho Mirage High School is to provide a high-quality, comprehensive, and meaningful education for all students. Each student will be expected to succeed within the bounds of their abilities and chosen educational and career goals.Each student will be treated as an individual, given the tools to be a lifelong learner, and taught to function as a member of a group and as a productive and meaningful member of society. Vision The vision for Rancho Mirage High School is guided by the PSUSD goals and includes students, parents and community, school and staff and school leadership. Neighborhood RMHS serves over 1600 students in grades nine through twelve.It draws its student population from Rancho Mirage,Palm Desert, Thousand Palms,and Cathedral City. Instruction Strong academic curriculum with an emphasis for career and college readiness. Interests in the performing arts,world languages,and sports programs.Culinary Arts,Automotive Technology, or Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID)as a focused pathway. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,athletic facilities,assembly areas, performing arts center, cafeteria, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Educational Programs Offered: •English I, II, III, IV, Honors, AP •Art I, II, III •ERWC •Theater I, II, III •Math I,II,III, Honors •Stage 2 PlayProd 1 •Pre Calc •Emerging Lit •Calc AP •Spanish I, II, III, AP •Stats, AP •French I, II, III, IV, AP •Weights, Adv •Concert Glee •PE Sports •AVID •Dance I, II •CTE •Aerobics •BAND •ASB 1 Pre Leadership 1 •Culinary I,II •Earth Sci •RACE/CAFÉ •Biology, Honors, AP •Cosmetology •Chemistry, Honors, AP •Tech I, II •Physics I, II, AP •Journalism, Beg, Adv •Psychology, AP •Edgenuity •World History •Public Speaking •AP Euro •World History •US History •Ethnic Studies •Lifetime Sports •Yearbook •Civ/Econ •Chambers •Gov Econ Honors, AP •Wind •Percussion/Orch •Concert Band •Concert •Music I,II •Chorale Academies: •Digital Arts Technology Academy (DATA) •Health & Environmental Academy of Learning (HEAL) •Math Engineering Science Achievement (MESA) •Robotics •Culinary Arts & Food Education (CAFÉ) •Rattler Automotive Careers Education (RACE) •Technical Theater Pathway N Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 RMHS 3Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Rancho Mirage High School 9-12 James Workman Middle School 6-8 Della S. Lindley Elementary School K-5 Landau Elementary School K-5 Rancho Mirage Elementary School K-5 Sunny Sands Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 RMHS 4Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:60 Acres Current Athletic Fields::N/A Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A PK-1 PK-2 B-100 B-200 B-300 B-400 B-500B-600B-700 B-800 B-C STA-1 PA-1 TEN-1 SOLAR-1SOLAR-2SOLAR-3SOLAR-4SOLAR-5SOLAR-6SOLAR-7SOLAR-8SOLAR-9SOLAR-10SOLAR-11SOLAR-12SOLAR-13SOLAR-14SOLAR-15SOLAR-16B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 RMHS 5Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270- 2702 (760) 416-6055 (760) 416-6075 33 67173 0127316 13149 Original Construction Date 2013 Original Capacity (MP 2012)Current Capacity Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 87 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (2017 EMG Reference)60 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 2,607 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 87 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 292,667 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 1,570 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 0 1,366 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 0 0 0 0 2034 2029 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-100 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 100 Permanent ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 100 2013 A# 108388 1 10865 D 1 B-200 200 LIBRARY/MEDIA BUILDING Permanent 200 LIBRARY/MEDIA BUILDING 2013 A# 108388 1 11014 D 1 B-300 300 CLASSROOM BUILDING Permanent 300 CLASSROOM BUILDING 2013 A# 108388 2 66619 D 1 B-400 400 PERFORMING ARTS Permanent 400 PERFORMING ARTS 2013 A# 108388 2 43899 D 1 B-500 500 GYMNASIUM BUILDING Permanent 500 GYMNASIUM BUILDING 2013 A# 108388 1 43899 D 1 B-600 600 CLASSROOM BUILDINGS Permanent 600 CLASSROOM BUILDINGS 2013 A# 108388 2 83153 D 1 B-700 700 BUILDINGS CAFETERIA Permanent 700 BUILDINGS CAFETERIA 2013 A# 108388 2 23071 D 1 B-D 800 BUILDING Permanent 800 BUILDING 2013 A# 108388 1 7039 D 1 B-C CONCESSIONS Permanent CONCESSIONS 2013 A# 108388 1 3108 C 1 B-GSH GRANDSTANDS -HOME Permanent GRANDSTANDS -HOME 2013 A# 108388 1 B-GSV GRANDSTANDS -VISITOR Permanent GRANDSTANDS -VISITOR 2013 A# 108388 1 Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 RMHS 6Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index STA-1 STADIUM Sports STADIUM 2013 A# 108388 1 TEN-1 TENNIS COURTS Sports TENNIS COURTS 2013 A# 108388 1 PA-1 PLAY FIELDS Sports PLAY FIELDS 2013 A# 108388 1 PK-1 PARKING 1 Parking PARKING 2013 A# 108388 1 PK-2 PARKING 2 Parking PARKING 2013 A# 108388 1 Solar-1 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(1 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-2 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(2 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-3 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(3 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-4 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(4 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-5 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(5 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-6 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(6 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-7 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(7 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-8 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(8 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-9 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(9 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-10 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(10 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-11 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(11 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-12 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(12 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-13 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(13 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-14 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(14 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-15 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(15 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 Solar-16 North East Parking Areas Solar Panels Solar Canopies (Parking)-(16 of 16) 2014 A# 112854 PPA 1 SCOREBOARD Scoreboard Football Scoreboard 2015 A# 114819 1 MARQUEE Marquee Sign Marquee Sign 2018 A# 116381 1 Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 RMHS 7 First Floor Second Floor Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 RMHS 8Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B N Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 RMHS 9Existing Campus Images 4 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 RMHS 10Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Notes: Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements.N JAMES WORKMAN MIDDLE JAMES WORKMAN MIDDLE JWMS 1 James Workman Middle School 69300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Cover Sheet PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan James Workman Middle School 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan JWMS 2 James Workman Middle School 69300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary James Workman Middle School (JWMS) Mission James Workman Middle School is fully committed to the development of independent, motivated citizens well prepared for the 21st Century.This will be achieved through: •Setting high expectations •Providing a positive, safe learning environment •Facilitating critical,independent thinkers •Fostering relationships between students, parents,staff,and the community Vision Innovative Experiences...Inspired Individuals Neighborhood JWMS is located in Cathedral City and serves the north side and a small population of Palm Springs students residing on the eastern side of it.The majority of JWMS students either walk or ride their bikes to schools. Instruction JWMS serves approximately 1,376 students in grades sixth through eighth in a technology- based environment as well as the arts. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,assembly area,multi-purpose room,kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •Social Studies, Honors •ASB •ELA Honors •US History, Honors •ELD I, II •Comp Graphics •Media Design •Yearbook •Art •Band, Beg, Adv •Creative Writing •Music Appreciation •PE, Adventure, Fitness N JWMS 3 James Workman Middle School 69300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Rancho Mirage High School 9-12 James Workman Middle School 6-8 Della S. Lindley Elementary School K-5 Landau Elementary School K-5 Rancho Mirage Elementary School K-5 Sunny Sands Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools JWMS 4 James Workman Middle School 69300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Site Information Totals Current Site Area:20.0 Acres Current Playground Area::5.4 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A PK-1 PK-2 BUS-1 B-1 B-2,3,4,5 B-6 B-9 B-8 B-7 P-12 P-13 P-14 P-15 P-16 P-17 P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7P-8P-9P-10P-11M-1 M-2 P-18 P-19 P-20 LS-1 Solar-3 Solar-4 Solar-5 Solar-1 Solar-2 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. Existing Campus Asset Plan JWMS 5 James Workman Middle School 69300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: James Workman Middle School 69-300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234-4921 (760) 770-8540 (760) 770-8545 33 67173 6112692 4981 Original Construction Date 1992 Original Capacity (MP 2012)1147 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 57 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)20 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,695 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 37 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 108,640 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 1,298 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 20 1,008 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 6,712,263 4,474,842 10,124,085 6,749,390 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1 ADMINISTRATION Permanent ADMINISTRATION -BUILDING 100 1995 A# 54222 1 5133 D 3 B-2,3,4,5 MAIN BUILDING Permanent CLASSROOMS 200'S, 400'S, 500'S / LIBRARY 1995 A# 54222 1 54952 D 3 B-6 MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE -BUILDING 600 1995 A# 54222 1 15446 D 3 B-9 RESTROOMS Permanent RESTROOMS -700 BUILDING 1995 A# 54222 1 753 D 3 B-8 LOCKERS Permanent LOCKER ROOMS -800 BUILDING 1995 A# 54222 1 6503 D 3 B-7 RESTROOMS Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING SOUTH 2000 A# 102346 1 534 C 2 P-1 RELO-1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 901 2000 A# 102346 1 960 S 2 P-2 RELO-2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 902 2000 A# 102346 1 960 S 2 P-3 RELO-3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 903 2000 A# 102346 1 960 S 2 P-4 RELO-4 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 904 2000 A# 102346 1 960 S 2 P-5 RELO-5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 905 2001 A# 104773 1 960 S 2 P-6 RELO-6 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 906 2001 A# 104773 1 960 S 2 P-7 RELO-7 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 907 2001 A# 104773 1 960 S 2 P-8 RELO-8 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 908 2001 A# 104773 1 960 S 2 P-9 RELO-9 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 909 2001 A# 104773 1 960 S 2 P-10 RELO-10 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 910 2001 A# 104773 1 960 S 2 JWMS 6 James Workman Middle School 69300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index P-11 PORTABLE-11 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 911 2010 A# 110964 1 960 1 M-1 RESTROOMS Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS NORTHEAST 2004 A# 102021 1 144 S 2 M-2 RESTROOMS Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS SOUTHEAST 2004 A# 102021 1 144 S 2 P-12 PORTABLE-12 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 912 1988 A# 47710 1 960 D 4 P-13 PORTABLE-13 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 913 1988 A# 47710 1 960 D 4 P-14 PORTABLE-14 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 914 2004 A# 110964 1 960 S 2 P-15 PORTABLE-15 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 915 2010 A# 110964 1 960 S 1 P-16 PORTABLE-16 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 916 2010 A# 110964 1 960 D 1 P-17 PORTABLE-17 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 917 2010 A# 110964 1 960 D 1 P-18 PORTABLE-18 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 918 2010 A# 104773 1 960 1 P-19 PORTABLE-19 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 919 2010 A# 104773 1 960 1 P-20 PORTABLE-20 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 920 2010 A# 104773 1 960 1 Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING LOT PARKING LOT 1995 A# 54222 3 PK-2 PARKING LOT PARKING LOT 1995 A# 54222 3 BUS-1 BUS DROP OFF BUS DROP OFF 1995 A# 54222 3 SS-1 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1995 A# 54222 1 1792 D 3 Solar-1 At North East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopy (Parking) -(1 of 5)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-2 At North East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopy (Parking) -(2 of 5)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-3 At South East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopy (Parking) -(3 of 5)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-4 At South East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopy (Parking) -(4 of 5)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 Solar-5 At South East Parking Solar Panels Solar Canopy (Parking) -(5 of 5)2014 A# 112755 PPA 1 JWMS 7 James Workman Middle School 69300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers JWMS 8 James Workman Middle School 69300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 A B N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A B AB JWMS 9 James Workman Middle School 69300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JWMS 10 James Workman Middle School 69300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N DELLA S. LINDLEY ELEMENTARY DELLA S. LINDLEY ELEMENTARY DLES 1 Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Della S. Lindley Elementary School 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Cover Sheet Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan DLES 2 Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Della S. Lindley Elementary School (DSLES) Vision and Mission The mission of Della S.Lindley Elementary School is to provide all students with a rigorous, academically advanced,safe, and secure learning environment to ensure they learn, demonstrate achievement, and reach their fullest potential and are prepared to be forward thinking and educationally equipped to be productive members of society and successful in the 21st century. Mission We're on the right track to: •Teach each student the skills they need for success in their grade. •Develop good citizenship in each student. •Provide a clean, safe, orderly school. Neighborhood DSLES is located in Thousand Palms,California, eight miles east of Palm Springs. Instruction DSLES serves approximately 620 students in grades kindergarten through fifth. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms, assembly area,multi-purpose room, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N DLES 3 Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Rancho Mirage High School 9-12 James Workman Middle School 6-8 Della S. Lindley Elementary School K-5 Landau Elementary School K-5 Rancho Mirage Elementary School K-5 Sunny Sands Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools DLES 4 Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Site Information Totals Current Site Area:17.9 Acres Current Playground Area::4.8 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A Existing Campus Asset Plan M-2 M-1 B-D PK-1 BUS-1 PK-2B-C PA-1 PA-3 PA-2 B-A SS-2SS-1 SS-4 M-3 SS-3 SS-7 SS-1 SS-2 B-B B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. DLES 5 Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31-495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276- 3343 (760) 343-7570 (760) 343-7576 33 67173 6106207 8932 Original Construction Date 1987 Original Capacity (MP 2012)372 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 35 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)17.9 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,031 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 23 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 64,809 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 595 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 13 830 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 2,230,313 1,486,875 3,376,078 2,250,719 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-A ADMIN. / CLASSROOMS / MP Permanent ADMIN. / CLASSROOMS 2-4, 10-13 / MP 1987 A# 46691 1 48687 S 4 B-B CLASSROOMS Permanent CLASSROOMS 5-9 1987 A# 46691 4 B-C SPECIAL PROGRAMS Permanent HEADSTART 1987 A# 46691 4 B-D CLASSROOMS Permanent CLASSROOMS 17-27 1987 A# 46691 4 M-1 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 32-35 2005 A# 104797 2 3840 S 2 M-2 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 40-47 2005 A# 102349 2 7680 S 2 M-3 RESTROOM Modular MODULAR RESTROOM 2005 A# 104780 1 136 S 2 P-1 RELO -HEAD START Portable HEAD START PORTABLE 2000 A# 51200 1 2240 S 2 DLES 6 Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2012 A# 112525 1 PK-1 PARKING 1 PARKING 1 1987 A# 46691 4 PK-2 PARKING 2 PARKING 2 1987 A# 46691 4 BUS-1 BUS DROP-OFF BUS DROP-OFF 1987 A# 46691 4 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2012 A# 112525 1 PA-3 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2012 A# 112525 1 SS-1 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCT 2014 A# 51200 1 SS-2 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCT 2014 A# 51200 1 SS-3 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2008 A# 108433 1 1403 S 2 SS-4 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2008 A# 108433 1 1403 S 2 SS-5 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2008 A# 108433 1 1403 S 2 SS-6 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2008 A# 108433 1 1403 S 2 SS-7 SHADE STRUCT SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117728 2018 1 DLES 7 Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers Second Floor First Floor Head Start DLES 8 Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 N 1 2 3 4 5 6 A A DLES 9 Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 DLES 10 Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N LANDAU ELEMENTARY LANDAU ELEMENTARY LES 1 Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Landau Elementary School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Cover Sheet www.planPSUSD.org 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan LES 2 Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Landau Elementary School (LES) Vision It is Landau’s vision to prepare our students for the rapidly changing world,while implementing innovative practices within a positive and engaging atmosphere. Mission The Mission at Landau Elementary is to build a strong school community by developing partnerships with families.We provide rigorous academic learning and utilize progressive technology to promote critical thinking and problem solving skills.Our collaborative teaching practices are both reflective and responsive,while maintaining enthusiasm about the teaching and learning process.We have a personal commitment to each student to create and maintain a safe learning environment by fostering positive social-emotional growth to ensure that each student has the opportunity to pursue their life goals. Neighborhood LES is located in cathedral City,California,a community adjacent to Palm Springs. Instruction LES serves approximately 750 students in Transitional Kindergarten through fifth grade for regular and special education. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices,classrooms, assembly area,multi-purpose room,kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N LES 3 Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Rancho Mirage High School 9-12 James Workman Middle School 6-8 Della S. Lindley Elementary School K-5 Landau Elementary School K-5 Rancho Mirage Elementary School K-5 Sunny Sands Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools LES 4 Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Site Information Totals Current Site Area:10.65 Acres Current Playground Area::4.8 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A Existing Campus Asset Plan P-15 P-10 P-11 P-12 P-14 P-9P-8P-7P-6 P-16P-5P-4P-3P-2 PA-2 P-13 SS-1 M-5 M-4 M-3B M-3B B-1 SS-4 PK-1 B-2 LS-1 SS-3 PA-3 PK-2 PK-3 SS-2 M-6 P-17 P-1PA-1 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. LES 5 Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234- 5200 (760) 770-8600 (760) 770-8607 33 67173 6107601 9420 Original Construction Date 1990 Original Capacity (MP 2012)589 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 40 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)10.65 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1,168 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 25 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 53,440 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 741 Relocatables (2018) PSUSD Provided 15 734 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 3,882,466 2,588,310 5,820,260 3,880,174 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1 BLDG '1' -ADMINISTRATION Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1991 A# 49349 A# 110277 2010 1 5712 S 1 B-2 BLDG '2' -MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1989 A# 49349 1 6410 S 4 M-3A BLDG '3A' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 12-17 / RR'S 1989 A# 49349 A# 110277 2010 1 5460 S 1 M-3B BLDG '3B' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 11-20 / RR'S 1989 A# 49349 A# 110277 2010 1 6150 S 1 M-4 BLDG '4' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 1-5 / RR'S 1989 A# 49349 A# 110277 2010 1 6150 S 1 M-5 BLDG '5' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS K1-K2 / RR'S 1989 A# 52104 A# 110277 2010 1 6150 S 1 M-6 BLDG '6' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 21-26 1989 A# 49349 A# 110277 2010 1 2592 S 1 P-1 RELO '1'Portable PRESCHOOL K3 1988 A# 114027 1 960 S 4 P-2 RELO '2' PRESCHOOL Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 27 1988 A# 50101 1 1440 D 4 P-3 RELO '3'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 28 1988 A# 50585 1 960 S 4 P-4 RELO '4'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 29 1988 A# 50418 1 960 S 4 P-5 RELO '5'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 30 1988 A# 51282 1 960 S 4 P-6 RELO '6'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 34 1989 A# 28717 1 960 D 4 P-7 RELO '7'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 33 1989 A# 28712 1 960 D 4 P-8 RELO '8'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 32 1988 A# 28713 1 960 D 4 LES 6 Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index P-9 RELO '9'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 31 1989 A# 28714 1 960 D 4 P-10 RELO '10'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 36 1989 A# 50418 1 960 D 4 P-11 RELO '11'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 37 1997 A# 68435 1 960 S 3 P-12 RELO '12'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 38 1988 A# 66565 1 960 S 4 P-13 RELO '13'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM K4-K5 1997 A# 66565 1 960 S 3 P-14 RELO '14'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 39 2016 A# 114771 1 960 S 1 P-15 RELO '15' Portable CLASSROOM 35 2016 A# 114771 1 960 S 1 P-16 RELO '16' KINDERGARTEN Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM K6 2016 A# 114771 1 1200 S 1 P-17 RELO '17'Portable PORTABLE RESTROOMS 2016 A# 114771 1 960 S 1 Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2013 A# 112736 1 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2013 A# 112736 1 PA-3 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 2013 A# 112736 1 PK-1 (E) PARKING LOT 'A'(E) PARKING LOT 'A'1994 A# 61258 A# 116360 2017 1 PK-2 (E) PARKING LOT '2'(E) PARKING LOT '2'1994 A# 61258 3 PK-3 PARKING 'B'PARKING 'B'2018 A# 116360 1 LS-1 SHADE STRUCTURE LUNCH SHELTER 1992 A# 56984 1 1536 S 3 SS-1 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE (1 of 3)2005 A# 105966 2 SS-2 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE (2 of 3)2005 A# 105966 2 SS-3 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE (3 of 3)2005 A# 105966 2 SS-4 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE 2019 A# 117693 1 LES 7 Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers LES 8 Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B A B N LES 9 Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LES 10 Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N RANCHO MIRAGE ELEMENTARY RANCHO MIRAGE ELEMENTARY RMES 1 Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42985 Indian Trail, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Rancho Mirage Elementary School PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Cover Sheet RMES 2 Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42985 Indian Trail, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Rancho Mirage Elementary School (RMES) Mission As a professional learning community, we, at Rancho Mirage Elementary School, will work collectively to provide a safe school environment that embraces diversity, and ensure that all students meet/exceed the California State Standards, and exhibit their personal best as we prepare them to be college and career ready, as well as productive citizens of society. Neighborhood RMES is located in Rancho Mirage,California. Instruction RMES serves approximately 467 students in Kindergarten through fifth grade for regular education and artistic educational-aligned workshops in school and performance at McCallum Theatre throughout the year.RMES provides a safe,student-centered learning environment where students are supported both academically and socio-emotionally. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,assembly area,multi-purpose room, kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N RMES 3 Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42985 Indian Trail, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Rancho Mirage High School 9-12 James Workman Middle School 6-8 Della S. Lindley Elementary School K-5 Landau Elementary School K-5 Rancho Mirage Elementary School K-5 Sunny Sands Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools RMES 4 Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42985 Indian Trail, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Site Information Totals Current Site Area:10.0 Acres Current Playground Area::3.7 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A Existing Campus Asset Plan M-1 B-800 PA-3 PK-2 PK-1 PA-1 SS-1 PA-2 B-200 B-700 B-100 WW-1 B-300,400,500,600 B-900 B-E SS-2 SS-3 SS-4 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. RMES 5 Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42985 Indian Trail, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42-985 Indian Trail Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270-4104 (760) 836-3680 (760) 836-3684 33 67173 6032445 4570 Original Construction Date 1968 Original Capacity (MP 2012)527 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 27 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)10 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 775 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 27 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 53,440 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 438 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 7 305 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 0 0 0 0 2020 2027 Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-100 ADMIN.Permanent ADMINISTRATION / KITCHEN 1967 A# 61258 A# 114091 (Fire Alarm)2015 1 5440 D 3 B-700 MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1995 A# 61258 A# 114091 (Fire Alarm)2015 1 5706 D 3 B-200 LIBRARY Permanent LIBRARY / COMPUTER LAB / LUNCH SHELTER 1967 A# 61258 A# 114091 (Fire Alarm)2015 1 3600 D 3 B- 300,400,500,600 CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-12 1967 A# 61258 A# 114091 (Fire Alarm)2015 1 15447 D 3 B-900 CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 13-15 1995 A# 61258 A# 114091 (Fire Alarm)2015 1 3925 D 3 B-800 KINDER Permanent CLASSROOMS K1-K2 1995 A# 61258 A# 114091 (Fire Alarm)2015 1 3540 D 3 M-1 RELO Modular 2-STORY CLASSROOMS 101-105, 201-205 2007 A# 109050 A# 114091 (Fire Alarm)2015 2 9760 S 2 B-E ELEVATOR Permanent ELEVATOR BUILDING 2007 A# 109050 A# 114091 (Fire Alarm)2015 2 196 S 2 RMES 6 Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42985 Indian Trail, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (1 of 3)2006 A# 112526 2 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (2 of 3)2006 A# 112526 2 PA-3 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (3 of 3)2006 A# 112526 2 FA FIRE ALARM FIRE ALARM 2015 A# 114091 1 PK-1 PARKING A PARKING A 1995 A# 61258 3 PK-2 PARKING B PARKING B 1995 A# 61258 3 WW-1 WALKWAY COVERED WALKWAYS 1967 A# 61258 1 7300 S 5 SS-1 SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117729 2018 1 SS-2 SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE STRUCTURE 2007 A# 109026 2 SS-3 SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE STRUCTURE 2000 A# 101930 2 SS-4 SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE STRUCTURE 2000 A# 101930 2 SS-5 SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE STRUCTURE (Removed)2002 A# 104040 2 RMES 7 Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42985 Indian Trail, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers Second Floor First Floor RMES 8 Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42985 Indian Trail, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 56 A B A B N RMES 9 Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42985 Indian Trail, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 RMES 10 Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42985 Indian Trail, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security MEP Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N SUNNY SANDS ELEMENTARY SUNNY SANDS ELEMENTARY SSES 1 Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Sunny Sands Elementary School 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.planPSUSD.org Cover Sheet Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan SSES 2 Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Sunny Sands School (SSES) Mission The Sunny Sands School community is dedicated to providing an outstanding elementary school program that will enable all children to realize their maximum potential in order to lead productive lives as responsible, informed citizens.We will provide a safe, nurturing, environment that inspires individual excellence and integrates the strengths of our diverse community. Vision Our vision/goal is to prepare each student to be independent thinkers,life-long learners that are able to master their grade level California Common Core Standards in English Language Arts,Mathematics, Social Studies, Science,the Fine Arts, Physical Education, Nutrition/Health and English Language Development by providing an educational program based on current educational research and best practices. Neighborhood SSES is located in Cathedral City,California,a community in the Coachella Valley serving a diverse student population.The school’s children speak many languages however, Spanish is the most dominant. Instruction SSES serves approximately 750 students in Transitional Kindergarten through Fifth grade.Over fifty percent of the students are English Language Learners and are offered daily English Language Development and Spanish support as needed. Summary of Facilities The spaces are a combination of offices, classrooms,assembly area,multi-purpose room,kitchen and supporting toilet rooms, storage, mechanical and other utility spaces. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered: •Reading/Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •History/Social Science N SSES 3 Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Rancho Mirage High School 9-12 James Workman Middle School 6-8 Della S. Lindley Elementary School K-5 Landau Elementary School K-5 Rancho Mirage Elementary School K-5 Sunny Sands Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 6 Schools SSES 4 Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Site Information Totals Current Site Area:11.2 Acres Current Playground Area::4.4 Acres Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A Existing Campus Asset Plan P-17P-16P-15 P-13 P-12 P-11 P-14 P-10 P-18 P-4 P-9 P-8 P-7 P-6 P-5 SS-5 M-17 PK-3SS-4 PK-2 LS-1 B-2 SS-1 P-K3 P-K4-K5 B-1 M-3A M-3B M-4 M-6B M-6A PA-2 PA-1 SS-2 SS-3 M-5 PK-1 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. SSES 5 Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234-2997 (760) 770-8635 (760) 770-8641 33 67173 6108450 9603 Original Construction Date 1988 Original Capacity (MP 2012)620 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 43 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)11.16 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 1279 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 26 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 59,160 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 726 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 18 528 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 4,431,511 2,954,341 6,676,981 4,451,321 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1 BLDG '1' ADMIN.Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1990 A# 51119 1 5720 S 3 B-2 BLDG '2' MULTI- PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1990 A# 51119 1 7176 S 3 M-4 BLDG '4' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 1-6 1990 A# 51119 1 5460 S 3 M-3B BLDG '3B' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 7-9, 16-18 1990 A# 51119 1 6120 S 3 M-3A BLDG '3A' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 10-15 1990 A# 51119 1 6120 S 3 M-6B BLDG. '6B' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 19-21 1990 A# 54113 / A# 114852 1 3090 S 3 M-6A BLDG '6A' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 22-24 1990 A# 54113 / A# 114852 1 3090 S 3 M-5 BLDG '5' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS K1-K2 1990 A# 51119 1 2560 S 3 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter SHADE SHELTER 1998 A# 105372 1 1584 S 3 M-17 RELO-HEAD START Modular HEADSTART MODULAR 1998 A# 105372 1 1920 S 3 P-K3 RELO-K3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM K3 1990 A# 52080 / A# 105372 1 960 D 3 SSES 6 Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index P-K4-K5 RELO-K4-K5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM K4-K5 1990 A# 66912 1 2400 S 3 P-9 RELO-9 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 25 1990 A# 53776 1 960 D 3 P-8 RELO-8 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 26 1990 A# 53776 1 960 D 3 P-7 RELO-7 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 27 1990 A# 53776 1 960 D 3 P-6 RELO-6 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 28 1990 A# 53776 1 960 D 3 P-5 RELO-5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 29 1990 A# 53776 1 960 D 3 P-4 RELO-4 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 30 1990 A# 53776 / A# 53739 1 960 D 3 P-10 RELO-10 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 31 1990 A# 66566 / A# 53528 1 960 D 3 P-11 RELO-11 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 33 1988 A# 56989 / A# 56984 1 960 S 4 P-12 RELO-12 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 34 1988 A# 56989 / A# 56985 1 960 S 4 P-13 RELO-13 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 35 1990 A# 56989 / A# 56986 1 960 D 3 P-14 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 32 2016 A# 114852 / A# 114027 1 960 D 1 P-15 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 36 1990 A# 53739 / A# 101524 1 960 D 3 P-16 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 37 1990 A# 53739 / A# 101524 1 960 D 3 P-17 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 38 1990 A# 53739 / A# 101524 1 960 3 P-18 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM K-6 2016 A# 114852 / A# 114027 1 1200 1 Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (1 of 2)1990 A# 51119 / 111048 3 PA-2 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA (2 of 2)1990 A# 51119 / 111048 3 PK-1 PARKING 'A'PARKING 'A'2016 A# 114852 1 PK-2 PARKING 'C'PARKING 'C'1990 A# 51119 2017 1 PK-3 PARKING 'D'PARKING 'D'1990 A# 51119 2017 1 SS-1 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE A# 113245 2013 1 SS-2 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE 2010 A# 111048 1 SS-3 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE 2016 A# 114852 1 SS-4 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE 2004 A# 105372 2 SS-5 SHADE STRUCT.SHADE STRUCTURE A# 117730 2018 1 SSES 7 Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers Headstart SSES 8 Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 A B A B N SSES 9 Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 SSES 10 Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. N ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS2.5 ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS2.5 DESERT LEARNING ACADEMY DESERT LEARNING ACADEMY DLA 1 Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Desert Learning Academy PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Cover Sheet www.planPSUSD.org 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5 Existing Campus Asset Summary 6 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 7 Existing Campus Image Key Map 8 Existing Campus Images 9 Campus Aerial & Master Plan DLA 2 Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Desert Learning Academy Mission Desert Learning Academy is a hybrid alternative school of choice.Established in 2015,this school provides personalized learning experiences for every student.Desert Learning Academy is a “tuition-free” and a progressive choice to prepare students for the 21st Century world.Students in grades 2 -12 experience education that molds to their strength and builds on the essential skills required for the future plans of parents or guardians.The school serves students in grades 2-12 from all schools and surrounding counties (Riverside,San Diego,San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties)to meet their personalized learning needs. Instruction/Summary of Facilities Students learn the content knowledge they need from an online system at home or scheduled time at school.They learn through a combination of diverse learning resources including texts,videos, presentations,exercises and one-on-one tutoring from their teachers.Students learn the facts and information they need to become college ready. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered Science Computer Applications Math Spanish History Resource English N DLA 3 Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Coachella Valley Schools 2-5, 6-8, 9-12 South East Riverside County Schools 2-5, 6-8, 9-12 Palm Springs Unified School District Schools 2-5, 6-8, 9-12 DLA 4 Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Site Information Totals Current Site Area:0.76 Acres Current Playground Area::N/A Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A B-200B-300 B-500 B-400 B-700 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. Existing Campus Asset Plan DLA 5 Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd, Palm Springs, CA 92264 (760) 778-0487 33 67173 3330925 Original Construction Date 1938 Original Capacity (MP 2012)Current Capacity Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 20 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (2017 EMG Referenc)0.76 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 602 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 20 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 37,410 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 218 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 0 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 1,995,546 1,330,364 2,658,605 1,772,403 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-200 CLASSROOMS 202-207 Permanent CLASSROOMS 202-207 1938 A#4366 A# 102161 2000 1 5300 B 2 B-300 CLASSROOMS 302-306 Permanent CLASSROOMS 302-306 1938 A#1933 A# 102161 2000 1 5207 B 2 B-400 CLASSROOMS 401-406 Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-406 1968 A#14469 A# 102161 2000 1 5330 S 2 B-500 CLASSROOMS 500 / MULTIPURPOSE Permanent CLASSROOMS 500 / MULTIPURPOSE 1980 A#23913 A# 102161 2000 1 13575 S 2 B-700 CAFETERIA / CLASSROOMS 703-704 Permanent CAFETERIA / CLASSROOMS 703-704 1940 A#14469 A# 102161 2000 1 5500 B 2 DLA 6 Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Ramon Rd. Building 600 used by Palm Springs High School Existing Campus Use Plan With Room Numbers Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District 2019 DLA 8 Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B Image Key 1 A B N DLA 9 Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Existing Campus Images DLA 10 Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 New Secure Entrance, Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. 3 Systems Upgrades: Site Lighting 4 Systems Upgrades:Fire Alarm 6 ADA Upgrades: Path of Travel General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. N EDWARD L. WENZLAFF EDUCATION CENTER EDWARD L. WENZLAFF EDUCATION CENTER EWEC 1 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Cover Sheet www.planPSUSD.org 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 Page Contents 1 Cover Sheet 2 Executive Summary 3 Attendance Area Boundary 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan EWEC 2 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center Instruction/Summary of Facilities Edward Wenzlaff Education Center is part of the Palm Springs Unified School District.The original Edward Wenzlaff Elementary School was fully renovated to house special District programs.The $12.8 million project was completed in 2015,and currently houses the Desert Hot Springs location of Mt.San Jacinto High School, Desert Learning Academy,PSUSD Family Engagement Center,and PSUSD Mental Health office.In addition, College of the Desert has classrooms and a Student Services office on the campus. Executive Summary Educational Programs Offered Multiple programs offered N EWEC 3 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Attendance Area Boundary Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Desert Hot Springs High School 9-12 Desert Springs Middle School 6-8 Painted Hills Middle School 6-8 Bella Vista Elementary School K-5 Bubbling Wells Elementary School K-5 Cabot Yerxa Elementary School K-5 Julius Corsini Elementary School K-5 Two Bunch Palms Elementary School K-5 Total Schools 8 Schools EWEC 4 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:10.0 Acres Current Playground Area::N/A Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A PK-1 PK-2 B-A B-D B-D M-ECE LS-S B-B P-5 B-G P-4 P-1 P-2 P-3 P-6 P-7 B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. EWEC 5 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 (760) 251-7244 Original Construction Date 1974 Original Capacity (MP 2012)Current Capacity Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 25 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (2017 EMG Reference)10.00 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 775 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 17 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 48,129 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE N/A Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 8 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as-built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-A ADMINISTRATION / MULTI- PURPOSE Permanent ADMINISTRATION / MULTI-PURPOSE 1975 A# 37222 A# 113068 2014 1 8660 S 1 B-D CLASSROOMS 2-9 / LIBRARY Permanent CLASSROOMS 312-319 / LIBRARY 1975 A# 39378 A# 113068 2014 1 11700 S 1 B-C CLASSROOMS 16-24 Permanent CLASSROOMS 200-208 1975 A#37222 A# 113068 2014 1 10400 S 1 B-B KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOM K1 Permanent KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOM K1 1975 A#41517 A# 113068 2014 1 1650 S 1 M-ECE RELO-K2 Modular MODULAR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CLASSROOM 1988 A# 50055 Refurbished 2015 1 1320 S 1 B-G RESTROOM BUILDING Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING 1975 A#37222 A# 113068 2014 1 480 S 1 P-1 RELO-1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 41 1988 A#50418 COD Refurbished 2015 1 960 S 1 P-2 RELO-2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 40 1988 A#50418 COD Refurbished 2015 1 960 S 1 P-3 RELO-3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 39 1990 A#50418 COD Refurbished 2015 1 960 D 1 P-4 RELO-4 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 30 1989 A#50418 1 960 D 4 P-5 RELO-5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 31 1989 A#50418 1 960 D 4 P-6 RELO-6 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 26 1990 A#50418 1 960 D 3 P-7 RELO-7 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 25 1988 A#50585 1 960 S 4 EWEC 6 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PK-1 PARKING 1 PARKING 1 1975 A# 37222 A# 113068 2014 1 PK-2 PARKING 2 PARKING 2 1975 A# 37222 A# 113068 2014 1 LS-S LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1975 A# 113068 2014 1 1536 S 1 EWEC 7 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 500 EWEC 8 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 1 2 3 4 5 A B A B N EWEC 9 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 1 2 3 4 5 Existing Campus Images EWEC 10 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements. Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light / Minor / Extensive Modernizations N MT. SAN JACINTO HIGH MT. SAN JACINTO HIGH MSJHS 1 Mt. San Jacinto High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Mt. San Jacinto High School Cover PSUSD –Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 150 District Center Drive Palm Springs, CA 92264 www.PSUSD.us Page Contents 1 Cover 2 Executive Summary 3 High School Attendance Area Map 4 Existing Campus Asset Plan 5-6 Existing Campus Asset Summary 7 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers 8 Existing Campus Image Key Map 9 Existing Campus Images 10 Campus Aerial & Master Plan MSJHS 2 Mt. San Jacinto High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Executive Summary Mt. San Jacinto Continuation High School Mission Mt.San Jacinto’s Mission is to welcome all students, and accept them at their various levels of academic and social/emotional performance.It is the mission of MSJHS’s school community to empower students to overcome obstacles,to develop the attributes that lead to resiliency,and to acquire the skills that will allow them to persevere in achieving their goals. Instruction/Summary of Facilities MSJCHS is located at two locations.The main location is in Cathedral City serving approximately 350 students in grades eleven through twelve in a traditional continuation program.Students participate in a contract- based learning to expedite their credit acquisition in order to receive a high school diploma. The other location is a satellite campus at Ed Wenzlaff Education Center located in Desert Hot Springs.This center serves approximately 180 students in grades eleven through twelve in a continuation program and continuation independent study. Educational Programs Offered: •English I, II, III •Biology •Integrated I,II •PE •Expository Writing •Weight Training •Economics •Public Speaking •Earth Science •Team Sports •Career Choices •Journalism •Accounting •Exploratory Elec •Leadership •Journalism •US History •Studio Art •RSP English •Psychology •Computer •Social Studies •Creative Writing •Art I,II •World History •Drug/Alcohol Awareness Academies: •Business & Finance Executive Summary N MSJHS 3 Mt. San Jacinto High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 High School Attendance Area Map Legend Elementary School Middle School High School Special Education School Alternative School & Other High School Boundary Attendance Area Schools Grades Served Desert Hot Springs High School 9-12 Cathedral City High School 9-12 Rancho Mirage High School 9-12 Palm Springs High School 9-12 Rancho Mirage High School 9-12 Total Schools 5 Schools MSJHS 4 Mt. San Jacinto High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Plan Site Information Totals Current Site Area:6.12 Acres Current Athletic Fields::N/A Rubber Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Surface Play Area:N/A Asphalt Parking Area:N/A PK-1 B-1 M-2 P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 M-RR B-1 REFER TO EXISTING SITE/CAMPUS ASSET SUMMARY FOR BUILDING INFORMATION. SS-1 MSJHS 5 Mt. San Jacinto High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE School:APN: Address:Phone: Fax:CDS Code:NCES/Federal School ID: Mt. San Jacinto Continuation High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234-5159 (760) 770-8563 (760) 770-8568 33 67173 3331121 8931 Original Construction Date 1990 Original Capacity (MP 2012)403 Classroom Count (2018) PSUSD Provided 8 Projected Enrollment (2026) General Notes Site Size (MP 2012)6.12 Acres Current Capacity (2019) PSUSD Provided 540 (31 Students / Classroom)Permanent (2018) PSUSD Provided 12 Facilities Condition Assessment (Facilities Condition Index) Note Facilities Condition Assessments were prepared by EMG/ Dude Solutions for PSUSD in November/ December 2017 and have been referenced for this document. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles. It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence. Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts, it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. Overall Square Footage (2017 EMG Reference) 33,830 SQ.FT.Current Enrollment (2018-2019) CDE 300 Relocatable (2018) PSUSD Provided 16 304 Text Color Coding/ Information Availability Text referring to buildings and structures shown in "Blue" is not available on PSUSD Building Insurance data, but currently exists on site. Cells have been left "blank" due to information unavailability, including FCI rating. Summary of State School Facility Modernization Program Funding Eligibility Grant Estimates Based on 2019 Pupil Grants Facility Information Building/ Site ID Notes Building Identification Numbers; Site Identification Numbers; Structure Identification Numbers have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012-2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Minimum Maximum Date Permanent Bld. (Again)Date Portable Bld. (Again)Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Total State Grant @60%District Share @40%Existing Asset Information This sheet is a snapshot of conditions evaluated and compiled in January 2019. The square footage and total structures on existing sites are based on 2015 insurance data provided by the District, site review including, site walks, staff input, as- built architectural drawings, and review of aerial photographs. 2,754,325 1,836,216 4,064,031 2,709,354 N/A N/A Buildings Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index B-1 MAIN BUILDING Permanent MAIN BUILDING 1989 A# 51545 1 25384 S 4 M-2 DAYCARE Modular ESPERANZA DAYCARE MODULAR 1993 A# 59003 1 1920 S 3 P-1 RELO-DAYCARE Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM NEXT TO DAYCARE 1993 1 960 S 3 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 16 1990 A# 53739 1 960 D 3 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 17 1990 A# 53739 1 960 D 3 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 22 2005 A# 69217 1 960 S 2 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 23 2005 A# 69217 1 960 S 2 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 20 1989 A# 52491 1 960 S 4 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 21 1989 A# 52491 1 960 S 4 M-2 RESTROOM Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS 2005 A# 69217 1 144 S 2 MSJHS 6 Mt. San Jacinto High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Asset Summary LEVEL 1 -EXCELLENT 2 -GOOD 3 -FAIR 4 -POOR 5 -VERY POOR DESCRIPTION LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE Priority Level: Low Priority Level: Minor Priority Level: Medium Priority Level: High Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are not a priority at this time. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. FACILITIES CONDITION INDEX (FCI)0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% AND ABOVE Site Improvements Site ID School/ Campus Building #Area-Type Area Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number DSA Year DSA Modernization Number DSA Modernization Year District Owned Stories Gross Square Footage Construction Class Facilities Condition Index PA-1 PLAY AREA PLAY AREA 1989 A# 51545 4 PK-1 FACULTY PARKING FACULTY PARKING 1989 A# 51545 4 SS-1 SHADE STRUCTURE SHADE STRUCTURE 2011 A# 109842 2008 1 MSJHS 7 Mt. San Jacinto High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Use Plan(s) With Room Numbers MSJHS 8 Mt. San Jacinto High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Image Key Map Image Key 1 A N A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A MSJHS 9 Mt. San Jacinto High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Existing Campus Images 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MSJHS 10 Mt. San Jacinto High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234 Palm Springs Unified School District June 25, 2019 Landau Blvd.CortaRd.Campus Aerial & Master Plan Legend:Classification of Work NC New Construction EM Extensive Modernization MM Medium Modernization LM Light Modernization FLS Fire,Life Safety SF Security ME P Mechanical,Electrical, Plumbing AR Architectural C Civil S Structural T Technology D Demo RP Replace O Other General Notes: The level of modernization can range from major to minor upgrades and has been identified as part of the prioritization process. Refer to Facilities Master Plan –Financial Summary for cost of potential projects identified.Projects have been reviewed for priority based on need as funding becomes available. A program level master budget has been drafted based on 2019 industry costs.Each phase will need to be adjusted for escalation,inflation,and overall market conditions per year as that phase of projects are implemented.The financial summary can also be referred to as the master budget.The master budget establishes project costs in four priority phases and a fifth phase noted as “other” over the next 10 years to account for immediate and future needs as part of the road map for long-range facilities improvements.N Recommended Long-Range Facilities Master Plan Projects 1 Security Upgrades 2 Various Upgrades at Existing Buildings: Light/ Minor/ Extensive Modernization. FINANCIAL SUMMARY3 FINANCIAL SUMMARY3 FS 1Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 LONG RANGE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN FINANCIAL SUMMARY Page intentionally left blank. FS 2Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 3Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Definitions FS # Financial Plan Methodology 4 Financial Summary Total all Schools 10 Cathedral City High School Boundary Cathedral City High 15 Nellie N. Coffman Middle 17 Agua Caliente Elementary 19 Cathedral City Elementary 21 Rio Vista Elementary 23 Desert Hot Springs High School Boundary Desert Hot Springs High 25 Desert Springs Middle 27 Painted Hills Middle 29 Bella Vista Elementary 31 Bubbling Wells Elementary 33 Cabot Yerxa Elementary 35 Julius Corsini Elementary 37 Two Bunch Palms Elementary 39 Palm Springs High School Boundary Palm Springs High 41 Raymond Cree Middle 43 Cahuilla Elementary 45 Cielo Vista Elementary 47 Katherine Finchy Elementary 49 Vista Del Monte Elementary 51 Rancho Mirage High School Boundary Rancho Mirage High 53 James Workman Middle 55 Della S. Lindley Elementary 57 Landau Elementary 59 Rancho Mirage Elementary 61 Sunny Sands Elementary 63 Alternative School Group Desert Learning Academy 65 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 67 Mt. San Jacinto High 69 Table of Contents FS 4Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN FINANCIAL SUMMARY Palm Springs Unified School District FACILITIES MASTER PLAN TOTALS: Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Priority O (Other) Pending Prioritization Priority Definitions 1-4 (& Other) Priority 1: (Projects can align with Categories 1-8) •Projects that need to be addressed as soon as funding becomes available. For example: fire, life safety, HVAC, roofing, asphalt/concrete repair. • Projects to support the educational program for classrooms May include major or minor modernization of facilities •Portables to permanent construction in lieu of major modernization . Priority 2: (Projects can align with Categories 1-8) •Projects associated with core facilities to that enhance educational programming. For example: collaboration space, libraries, performing arts and aquatics centers. • Projects to support the educational program for core facilities and additional classrooms. • Projects that provide new or renovated facilities to update the school site. For example: curb appeal, food services, landscaping, way finding. • May include major or minor modernization of facilities Portables to permanent construction in lieu of major modernization. Priority 3: (Projects can align with Categories 1-8) •Projects that update or enlarge old facilities. For example: exterior painting, MPR & playground equipment. • Projects that add facilities for schools. For example: athletic facilities, lunch shelter, parking lots & restrooms. •Portables to permanent construction. •Projects to support the educational program for core facilities and additional classrooms as needed. •May include major or minor modernization of facilities. Priority 4: (Projects can align with Categories 1-8) •Life-Cycle -Non critical replacements, removals, upgrades. • On-going projects that add facilities for schools. For example: athletic facilities, lunch shelter, parking lots & restrooms. •On-going Portables to permanent construction. •On-going minor modernization of facilities. Priority O: (Projects can align with Categories 1-8) •Life-Cycle -Non critical replacements, removals, upgrades. •On-going projects that add facilities for schools. For example: athletic facilities, lunch shelter, parking lots & restrooms. •On-going Portables to permanent construction. •On-going minor modernization of facilities. Project Categories 1-8 1 Safety / Security 2 DSA / Code / ADA / Fire-life / Structural 3 Site Improvements / Repairs / Removals / Demolition 4 Building Improvements / Repairs / Modernizations 5 Building Systems / MEP / General Site Systems 6 Technology Infrastructure / Equipment 7 Construction / New / Expansion 8 Sustainable Opportunities / Site Utilities FS 5Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Project Category Definitions The process of identifying Master Plan projects included an “outreach / assessment”phase. Projects were identified based on feedback from site administrators,community members,and other stakeholders.In addition, projects were also identified during site walks by PBK’s team of professional planners, including architects,engineers,and subject matter experts. The project categories have been developed as a result of reoccurring themes that are related to facilities improvement programs.Categories 1-8 are broadly based.Projects maybe associated with more then one category and will be aligned with Districtobjectives. 1 Safety /Security Safety and security best practices,as well as gap assessments are components of a long-range facility master planning process;with additional safety and security measures incorporated as appropriate in order to maintain safe &secure learning environments now and in the future.Design will be specific and appropriate for each site.At the master planning level,an allowance maybe provided prior to a detailed safety and security design phase and/or vendor provided estimate. Some components of a Safety /Security items below: Communication system upgrades/PA systems Front entry modifications/reinforcement Clock and bell Systems Perimeter fencing in select locations Exterior site lighting improvements Security cameras Security system integration phone system Lock-down panic hardware devices Room graphics and way-finding/signage Student Drop-off/Pick-up system improvements 2 DSA / Code / ADA / Fire-life /Structural DSA/Code/ ADA/ Fire-life/ Structural is a broad category of projects that are required as part of new construction or modernizations on existing sites. The Division of the State Architect (DSA) provides design and construction oversight for K–12 schools and state owned essential services buildings. Projects under this category may include the following: The DSA specifically regulates Building Code and Education Code compliance for: Structural Safety (SS) Fire & Life Safety (FLS) Accessibility (ACS) Other local agency requirements related to Code/ ADA/ Fire-life/ Structural elements Master Plan Projects-Definitions Project Categories 1-8 1 Safety /Security 2 DSA / Code / ADA / Fire-life /Structural 3 Site Improvements / Repairs / Removals / Demolition 4 Building Improvements / Repairs / Modernizations 5 Building Systems / MEP / General Site Systems 6 Technology Infrastructure /Equipment 7 Construction / New /Expansion 8 Sustainable Opportunities / Site Utilities FS 6Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Project Category Definitions 4 Building Improvements / Repairs / Modernizations (Continued…) Major Modernization Examples: Food Services Food services upgrades include (but are not limited to):Applicable components of the major modernization work,but using materials unique to food service space(s).It may also include new equipment. Innovation Lab Innovation Lab upgrades include (but are not limited to):Applicable components of a Major Modernization unit cost;however, the design of the space as well as its specific components will be geared towards flexible design features to accommodate possible functions such as a:media center,maker‐space,and multiple breakout spaces.To allow maximum flexibility,the design shall provide operable partitions (example:folding glass wall)to subdivide the large space into smaller spaces.Design features shall include:flexible/adaptable furnishing systems,adequate natural light (example:skylights and high windows),access to exterior learning spaces/outdoor classrooms,an open flexible design, easily maintained finishes,AV system including LCD monitors and wireless connectivity, and adequate power outlets. Library/Media Center Library/Media Center upgrades include (but are not limited to):Applicable components of a major modernization unit cost.To allow maximum flexibility,the design of this space shall provide students with the ability to study individually or in collaboration with other students by providing adequate breakout or collaboration spaces.Design features shall include:flexible/adaptable furnishing systems,stack system,adequate natural light (example:access to exterior learning spaces/outdoor classrooms,an open flexible design,easily maintained finishes,wireless connectivity, and adequate power outlets. Master Plan Projects-Definitions Project Category Definitions 3 Technology Infrastructure/Equipment The wide-spread use of technology has permeated virtually every aspect of our daily lives. Districts have quickly progressed from the personal computer (desktop) through the age of laptops;tablets, pads and notebooks;to readers, hand-held devices,wearables and other interactive devices.At the Master Planning level,an allowance maybe provided prior to a detailed technology design phase and /or a vendor provided estimate. The Technology Infrastructure/ Equipment category may include the following: Audio/ Visual equipment Wireless technology upgrades Technology related upgrades and equipment 4 Building Improvements / Repairs /Modernizations Building Improvements/ Repairs/ Modernizations is a broad category of projects that are planned as part of new construction or modernization work. The list of elements below maybe included.At the Master Planning level,an allowance maybe provided prior to a detailed design phase and will be associated with a unit cost,square footage cost,linear foot cost,or a vendor provided estimate. Minor Modernization (lower Cost –related to finishes and repairs): Minor modernization work includes (but is not limited to): Tackable wall covering Full height marker boards Flooring and base Paint and finishes Ceiling finishes Doors and hardware Signage Window coverings Casework Restroom accessories and partitions Major Modernization (Higher Cost –related to finishes, repairs, and more extensive modernizations): Major modernization work includes items listed above (but is not limited to): Major classroom and core facilities modernizations to include reconfiguration of space. Depending on type of classroom or core facility, the cost will be estimated accordingly. FS 7Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Project Category Definitions 6 Site Improvements / Repairs / Removals /Demolition Site Improvements/Repairs/ Removals/Demolition is a broad category of projects that are planned as part of new construction or modernization work as related to site improvements.At the Master Planning level,an allowance maybe provided prior to a detailed design process and will be associated with a unit cost,square footage cost,linear footage cost,or a vendor provided estimate. Site Improvements/ Repairs/ Removals/ Demolition work my include: Curb Appeal Curb Appeal work may include an allowance for sites that may want to add specific elements such as:A mounted marquee,school mural,sitting area(s),and enhanced landscaping such as new trees,planting beds,and upgraded irrigation to accommodate the improvements. Physical Education Physical Education upgrades include (but are not limited to):Play area resurfacing,play structures,and general play area upgrades. Demolition/ Systems Removal Demolition work includes (but in not limited to):Removal of buildings such as deteriorated portables or portables no longer required,demolition of building systems,site features,site infrastructure, and other structures on a site in poor condition or no longer required. 7 Construction / New /Expansion Construction/New/Expansion is a category of projects that are planned as part of new construction or modernization work as related to building and major site additions.At the Master Planning level,an allowance may be provided prior to a detailed design process and will be associated with a unit cost, square footage cost,linear footage cost,or a vendor provided estimate. Construction/New/Expansion project may include: New construction work includes (but is not limited to): New additions of buildings, new expansion to existing buildings, major building systems, site features, site infrastructure, and other new structures. Master Plan Projects-Definitions Project Category Definitions 5 Building Systems / MEP / General Site Systems Building Systems/MEP,General Site Systems is a broad category of projects that are planned as part of new construction or modernization work as related to building systems.At the Master Planning level, an allowance maybe provided prior to a detailed design process and will be associated with a unit cost, square footage cost,liner footage cost,or a vendor provided estimate. Building Systems/ MEP, General Site Systems may include projects as categorized by the Uniformat II Major Group Elements : A. Substructure A10 -Foundations A20 –BasementConstruction B. Shell B10 -Superstructure B20 -Exterior Enclosure B30 -Roofing C. Interiors C10 -Interior Construction C20 -Stairs C30 -Interior Finishes D. Services D10 -Conveying D20 -Plumbing D30 -HVAC D40 -Fire Protection D50 -Electrical E.Equipment E10 -Equipment E20 -Furnishings F. Special Construction &Demolition F10 -Special Construction F20 -Selective Building Demolition G. Building Site Work G10 -Site Preparation G20 -Site Improvements G30 -Site Mechanical Utilities G40 -Site Electrical Utilities G90 -Other Site Construction FS 8Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Project Category Definitions 8 Sustainable Opportunities / Site Utilities Sustainable Opportunities/ Site Utilities is a category of projects that are planned as part of new construction or modernization work as related to upgrades to more efficient utilities as related to creating a more sustainable site.At the master planning level,an allowance maybe provided prior to a detailed design phase and will be associated with a unit cost,square footage cost,linear foot cost,or a vendor provided estimate. Sustainable Opportunities/Site Utilities projects may include: Solar installations Site power upgrades Energy managementprograms Other site utilities upgrades Other sustainable opportunities Note:Master Plan projects are structured with-in categories 1-8 as listed above and align with the financial cost summaries in the financial section of this document. Master Plan Projects-Definitions FS 9Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Site / Campus Asset Analysis Facility Condition Index (FCI) Excellent Priority Level: Low Modernization, upgrades due to systems’ failures are not a priority at this time. The FCI is excellent for this building / structure. This building /structure is like new. For this study, permanent buildings 10 years old or less are classified in this category. The Life-Cycle status is between 0-25% for most major systems. Good Priority Level: Minor Modernization, upgrades due to systems failures are a minor priority at this time. The FCI is good for this building / structure. This building / structure has received comprehensive stewardship. For this study, permanent buildings 20 years old or less are classified in this category. The Life-Cycle status is between 26-50% for most major systems. Fair Priority Level: Medium Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a medium priority at this time. Major systems are beginning to fail and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. The FCI is fair for this building / structure. This building / structure has received managed care. For this study, permanent buildings 30 years old or less are classified in this category. The Life-Cycle status is between 51-75% for most major systems. Poor Priority Level: High Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the future. The FCI is poor for this building / structure. This building / structure has received reactive management. For this study, permanent buildings 40 years old or less are classified in this category. The Life-Cycle status is between 76-100% for most major systems. Very Poor Priority Level: Very High Modernization, upgrades, replacements due to systems failures are a very high priority at this time. Major systems are failing and should be scheduled for modernization, upgrades, replacements in the near future. The FCI is very poor for this building / structure. This building / structure is in need of extensive care. For this study, permanent buildings 50 years old or more are classified in this category. The Life-Cycle status is over 100% for most major systems. LEVEL 1 2 3 4 5 DESCRIPTION EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR VERY POOR LIKE NEW FACILITY COMPREHENSIVE STEWARDSHIP MANAGED CARE REACTIVE MANAGEMENT IMMEDIATE RESPONSE FCI 0% -25%26% -50%51% -75%76% -100%101% and above The national facilities standards criteria have been streamlined for this Long-Range Facilities Master Planning study. The School Facilities Condition Index (FCI)is an evaluation method based on building and major building system life-cycles.It is an objective way to evaluate existing conditions based on building systems that range from excellent condition to very poor due to age, use, or obsolescence.Although the FCI is not the only criteria that should be used to support modernization, replacement, or new construction efforts,it provides an important benchmark for facilities assessment. When planning school facilities‘programs for modernization, replacements, and new construction,it is essential to consider multiple factors. Factors to consider: Facility Age Facility Capacity &Utilization Facility Condition Facility Assessment Findings Facilities Condition Index (FCI) The facility condition index (FCI)is used to provide a benchmark to compare the relative condition of a group of facilities. FCI is an industry-standard measurement of a facility's condition that is the ratio of the cost to correct a facility's deficiencies to the Current Replacement Value (CRV)of the facilities.FCI is typically expressed as a percentage.The lower the FCI,the better the condition of the building and the lower the need for remedial/maintenance work. An FCI of 50%means that an investment of 50%of the building’s total cost is needed in order to keep the facility in working order. The FCI is primarily used to support asset management initiatives. The percentage scale has been expanded for this study from 0%- 100%.The green color indicates that the facility is in good condition and may only require minor repair.The red color indicates extensive repair and in some cases,the facility may be less costly to replace than repair.The FCI %is an indicator of the maintenance requirements of an existing facility versus the cost of replacing that facility.There may be many other factors that determine replacement or repair.Mathematically, the FCI is represented as:maintenance, repair, and replacement deficiencies of the facility,divided by current replacement value of the facility. Example: $50,000 (Repair Cost)/ $100,000 (Replacement Value)=50%FCI As the public school environment becomes increasingly more challenging due to aging facilities and reduced funding,it is essential that all available resources are used optimally and effectively.The need to place reliability at the forefront of design for building systems is becoming increasingly important, as operational failures, maintenance policies and logistic support issues,directly and/or indirectly, affect the through life performance and adversely affect the educational environment.Reliability analysis and its implementation will lead to an improved whole life performance of the building systems. Building systems encompass architectural, mechanical,electrical, plumbing, structural,security,safety, information, and other systems. The systems are installed to support the required functions of the building,so it is essential that they can be carried out without interruption in meeting the users’ needs, through reliability resulting in cost effectiveness throughout the whole life cycle.Since building systems are complex and encompass many different kinds of components, the ability of the systems to continually perform interactively is of vital importance.Reliability defines the ability of a system or component to perform its required functions under stated conditions for a specified period of time.Reliability is an essential factor used in assessing the performance of a building services’ system .Poor reliability directly or indirectly affects health, security and safety,as well as continuity.Systems with high reliability may offer opportunities for less maintenance. Decisions about facilities-related investments typically involve a great deal of input from numerous stake holders in a school District, therefore a thorough and objective process of evaluation is essential to support and fund capital investments.Assumptions are specific for this study based on the District portfolio of assets.By using standard methodologies and assumptions,District staff and end users will be able to compare facilities and build confidence in the projects they are planning. School Facilities Condition Index FS 10Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN TOTALS: MODERNIZATION/ NEW CONSTRUCTION/ CODE & CRITICAL LIFE-CYCLE PROJECTS Total all Schools Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & O Cathedral City High School Boundary Cathedral City High $ 2,399,943 $ -$ 22,155,120 $ 974,025 $ 25,529,088 $ -$ 25,529,088 Nellie N. Coffman Middle $ -$ 21,136,986 $ -$ 1,691,118 $ 22,828,104 $ 112,320 $ 22,940,424 Agua Caliente Elementary $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - Cathedral City Elementary $ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 7,243,704 $ 7,477,704 $ -$ 7,477,704 Rio Vista Elementary $ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 6,374,277 $ 6,608,277 $ -$ 6,608,277 $ 2,399,943 $ 21,604,986 $ 22,155,120 $ 16,283,124 $ 62,443,173 $ 112,320 $ 62,555,493 Desert Hot Springs High School Boundary Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & O Desert Hot Springs High $ 4,914,000 $ -$ 21,423,402 $ 6,576,804 $ 32,914,206 $ 10,718,136 $ 43,632,342 Desert Springs Middle $ -$ -$ 21,630,960 $ 125,798 $ 21,756,758 $ -$ 21,756,758 Painted Hills Middle $ -$ -$ -$ 15,600 $ 15,600 $ -$ 15,600 Bella Vista Elementary $ -$ 234,000 $ -$ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 234,000 Bubbling Wells Elementary $ -$ 234,000 $ 7,153,692 $ 9,522,427 $ 16,910,119 $ -$ 16,910,119 Cabot Yerxa Elementary $ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 7,792,512 $ 8,026,512 $ -$ 8,026,512 Julius Corsini Elementary $ -$ 1,887,600 $ 1,477,320 $ 4,454,580 $ 7,819,500 $ -$ 7,819,500 Two Bunch Palms Elementary $ -$ 708,240 $ 8,079,318 $ 908,856 $ 9,696,414 $ -$ 9,696,414 $ 4,914,000 $ 3,297,840 $ 59,764,692 $ 29,396,578 $ 97,373,110 $ 10,718,136 $ 108,091,246 Palm Springs High School Boundary Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & O Palm Springs High $ -$ 7,964,424 $ 30,201,678 $ 6,187,194 $ 44,353,296 $ -$ 44,353,296 Raymond Cree Middle $ 33,354,750 $ 20,304,726 $ 854,880 $ -$ 54,514,356 $ -$ 54,514,356 Cahuilla Elementary $ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 3,189,771 $ 3,423,771 $ -$ 3,423,771 Cielo Vista Elementary $ 13,839,930 $ 234,000 $ 1,026,792 $ 474,240 $ 15,574,962 $ -$ 15,574,962 Katherine Finchy Elementary $ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 3,973,554 $ 4,207,554 $ -$ 4,207,554 Vista Del Monte Elementary $ 6,777,342 $ 234,000 $ 236,808 $ 8,204,052 $ 15,452,202 $ -$ 15,452,202 $ 53,972,022 $ 29,205,150 $ 32,320,158 $ 22,028,811 $ 137,526,141 $ -$ 137,526,141 KEY Financial Summary Potential Fire Alarm Needs Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 FS 11Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN TOTALS: MODERNIZATION/ NEW CONSTRUCTION/ CODE & CRITICAL LIFE-CYCLE PROJECTS Potential Fire Alarm Needs KEY Financial Summary Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Rancho Mirage High School Boundary Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & O Rancho Mirage High $ -$ -$ -$ 15,600 $ 15,600 $ -$ 15,600 James Workman Middle $ -$ -$ 19,372,158 $ 956,920 $ 20,329,078 $ -$ 20,329,078 Della S. Lindley Elementary $ 683,406 $ 11,626,758 $ -$ 1,363,752 $ 13,673,916 $ -$ 13,673,916 Landau Elementary $ 607,851 $ 6,970,860 $ -$ 10,910,640 $ 18,489,351 $ -$ 18,489,351 Rancho Mirage Elementary $ -$ 569,400 $ 12,631,944 $ 1,375,920 $ 14,577,264 $ -$ 14,577,264 Sunny Sands Elementary $ 647,076 $ -$ 7,515,955 $ 1,128,442 $ 9,291,472 $ -$ 9,291,472 $ 1,938,333 $ 19,167,018 $ 39,520,057 $ 15,751,273 $ 76,376,681 $ -$ 76,376,681 Alternative School Group Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & O Desert Learning Academy $ -$ -$ -$ 4,145,700 $ 4,145,700 $ 4,429,269 $ 8,574,969 Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center $ -$ 234,000 $ 7,351,843 $ -$ 7,585,843 $ -$ 7,585,843 Mt. San Jacinto High $ -$ -$ 6,422,832 $ 5,803,325 $ 12,226,157 $ -$ 12,226,157 $ -$ 234,000 $ 13,774,675 $ 9,949,025 $ 23,957,700 $ 4,429,269 $ 28,386,969 Sub Total All Sites $ 63,224,298 $ 73,508,994 $ 167,534,702 $ 93,408,811 $ 397,676,805 $ 15,259,725 $ 412,936,530 8% Escalation-20% Per Phase $ 5,057,944 $ 8,821,079 $ 26,805,552 $ 18,681,762 $ 59,366,338 $ 3,662,334 $ 63,028,672 10% Life-Cycle Critical Repair/Replacement as needed $ 6,322,430 $ 7,350,899 $ 16,753,470 $ 9,340,881 $ 39,767,681 $ 1,525,973 $ 41,293,653 10% Project Contingency $ 6,322,430 $ 7,350,899 $ 16,753,470 $ 9,340,881 $ 39,767,681 $ 1,525,973 $ 41,293,653 Grand Total $ 80,927,101 $ 97,031,872 $ 227,847,195 $ 130,772,336 $ 536,578,504 $ 21,974,004 $ 558,552,508 Fund Servicing Total *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted in 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Annual escalation is market driven and the factor may be at 8%-20% for example, and will impact the total cost of a project. Final construction cost of a project is determined by actual bids received, change orders, close-out, testing, commissioning, other, DSA and Agency requirements. Additional information and direction from PSUSD is required to factor costs for items listed: Cost is not part of total. SAFETY & SECURITY Note: Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ASPHALT/ CONCRETE ROOFING OUTDOOR LEARNING NEW SITE IMPROVEMENTS NEW CONSTRUCTION Page intentionally left blank. FS 12Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 13Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Financial Summary Fire Alarms (Costs are part of the total in the School Summary) Fire Alarm estimates are based on total square feet of permanent, modular, and portable buildings per the update of the PSUSD Assets as of May 2019. Shade Shelters, solar arrays, storage structures, outdoor permanent structures/ open structures have not been considered as part of the total square footage for the Fire Alarm estimate. Total all Schools Total Square Feet (Includes Permanent, Modular, and Portable Buildings.) Rate -Per Square Foot Total Hard Cost-Direct Project Cost Total Soft Cost -Includes Engineering, Testing, Inspection @ 30% (Design Fee is estimated at 12%) Fire Alarm Estimated Total Prioritized Notes Cathedral City High 219,775 $ 7 $ 1,538,425 $ 461,528 $ 1,999,953 District Requested to be Prioritized PBK Provided Proposal. Update/ Revision Required Della S. Lindley Elementary 62,583 $ 7 $ 438,081 $ 131,424 $ 569,505 District Requested to be Prioritized PBK Provided Proposal. Update/ Revision Required Landau Elementary 55,664 $ 7 $ 389,648 $ 116,894 $ 506,542 District Requested to be Prioritized PBK Provided Proposal. Update/ Revision Required Sunny Sands Elementary 59,256 $ 7 $ 414,792 $ 124,438 $ 539,230 District Requested to be Prioritized PBK Provided Proposal. Update/ Revision Required Sub Total All Sites 397,278 $ 7 $ 2,780,946 $ 834,284 $ 3,615,230 8% Escalation Dependent upon Market Conditions. $ 289,218 8% Project Contingency Dependent upon project complexity. $ 289,218 Grand Total $ 4,193,667 Fund Servicing Total *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted in 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Annual escalation is market driven and the factor may be at 8%-20% for example, and will impact the total cost of a project. Final construction cost of a project is determined by actual bids received, change orders, close-out, testing, commissioning, other, DSA and Agency requirements. Additional information and direction from PSUSD is required to factor costs for items listed: Cost is not part of total. SAFETY & SECURITY Note: Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM ASPHALT/ CONCRETE ROOFING OUTDOOR LEARNING NEW SITE IMPROVEMENTS NEW CONSTRUCTION Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 14Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 15Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234-4713 33 67173 3330578 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) 3 B-F BUILDING F Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1991 A# 51230 2 24078 Medium Mod./& Addition $ 4,695,210 $ 4,695,210 $ 4,695,210 3 B-B BUILDING B Permanent GYMNASIUM / COMMONS 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 41579 Medium Mod./& Addition 3 B-A1 BUILDING A Permanent THEATER 1991 A# 51230 1 9655 Medium Mod./& Addition 3 B-A2 BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 702-708 EVEN / KITCHEN 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 12956 Medium Mod./& Addition $ 2,526,420 $ 2,526,420 $ 2,526,420 3 B-A3 BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 703--709 ODD / 806-812 EVEN 1992 A# 55490 1 9551 Medium Mod./& Addition $ 1,862,445 $ 1,862,445 $ 1,862,445 3 B-A4 BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 801-815 ODD 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 11338 Medium Mod./& Addition 3 B-E1 BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 102-118 EVEN 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 8842 Medium Mod./& Addition 3 B-E2 BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 101-115 ODD / 202-216 EVEN 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 23497 Medium Mod./& Addition 3 B-E3 BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 201-217 ODD 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 9244 Medium Mod./& Addition 3 B-E4 BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 120/122/219/221 1992 A# 55490 1 3784 Medium Mod./& Addition 3 B-D1 BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 302-318 EVEN 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 9096 Medium Mod./& Addition $ 1,773,720 $ 1,773,720 $ 1,773,720 3 B-D2 BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 320/322/419/421 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 3784 Medium Mod./& Addition $ 737,880 $ 737,880 $ 737,880 3 B-D3 BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-417 ODD 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 9096 Medium Mod./& Addition $ 1,773,720 $ 1,773,720 $ 1,773,720 3 B-D4 BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 301-321 ODD / 402-422 EVEN 1991 A# 51230 / 55490 1 26119 Medium Mod./& Addition $ 5,093,205 $ 5,093,205 $ 5,093,205 2 M-G1 BUILDING G -RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 501-504 2002 A# 102349 2 3840 Light Mod./ & Addition $ 374,400 $ 374,400 $ 374,400 2 M-G2 BUILDING G -RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 505-508 2002 A# 109063 2 3840 Light Mod./ & Addition 2 M-G3 BUILDING G -RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 509-512 2002 A# 116605 2 3840 Light Mod./ & Addition $ 374,400 $ 374,400 $ 374,400 2 B-G4 BUILDING G -RELO Permanent ELEVATOR TOWER @ 500 BLDGS.2002 A# 102349 2 191 Light Mod./ & Addition 2 B-GRR RESTROOM Permanent RESTROOMS @ 500 BLDGS.2002 A# 107815 1 645 Light Mod./ & Addition $ 62,888 $ 62,888 $ 62,888 3 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P1 1991 A# 57455 1 960 3 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P2 1991 A# 57455 1 960 3 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P3 1991 A# 57455 1 960 3 P-17 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P17 1991 A#57455 1 960 3 P-18 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P18 1991 A#57455 1 960 3 B-C1 BUILDING C Permanent ELECTRICAL BUILDING 1991 A# 51230 1 1476 3 B-C2 BUILDING C Permanent CHILLERS & CANOPY -(3) 1991 A# 51230 1 1200 3 B-G BUILDING G Permanent FOOTBALL PRESSBOX / ELEVATOR 1991 A# 62835 2 328 3 B-GSH GRANDSTANDS HOME Permanent HOME GRANDSTAND / TEAM ROOMS 1991 A# 62835 1 12375 3 B-GSV GRANDSTANDS VISITOR Permanent VISITOR GRANDSTAND 1991 A# 62835 1 7515 3 B-BB1 BASEBALL DUGOUT Permanent BASEBALL HOME DUGOUT / STORAGE 1991 A# 62835 1 825 3 B-BB2 BASEBALL DUGOUT Permanent BASEBALL VISITOR DUGOUT 1991 A# 62835 1 473 3 B-EN ENTRY GATES Permanent ENTRY PORTICOS / GATES (3)1991 A# 62835 1 1512 1 P-P POOL Permanent POOL 2017 A# 114416 1 1 B-H BUILDING H Permanent STADIUM RESTROOM/SNACK COMPLEX 2010 A# 110640 1 2 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTERS Shelters LUNCH SHELTERS (5 Structures)2006 A# 109838 1 1720 Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 FS 16Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Cathedral City High School 69250 Dinah Shore Dr., Cathedral City, CA 92234-4713 33 67173 3330578 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD 219775 New $ 1,999,953 $ 1,999,953 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 OUTDOOR LEARNING SITE FLEXIBLE SPACES (OUTSIDE CLASSROOM) TBD TBD New 0 NEW-6 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SCOREBOARD @ FIELD TBD TBD New 0 NEW-7 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SCOREBOARD @ TENNIS COURTS - ON POST TBD TBD New 0 NEW-8 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE PE/ FIELD LIGHTING / TENNIS COURT LIGHTING TBD TBD New 0 NEW-9 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE EXPLORATORY SPACE @ INTERIOR TBD TBD New 0 NEW-10 SITE IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT SMART BOARDS WITH MONITORS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-11 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SHADE STRUCTURE AT PRACTICE FIELD TBD TBD New 0 NEW-12 SITE IMPROVEMENT PERMANENT LIBRARY CONVERSION/ TO PARENT CENTER TBD TBD New 0 NEW-13 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE MODERNIZATION @ COMMONS AREA/ LANDSCAPE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-14 CONVERSION PERMANENT MODERNIZATION @ OFFICE SPACES/ PROTOTYPE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-15 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT COLLBORATION SPACES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-16 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT PE SPACE/ RR/ DANCE/ WESTLING/ WEIGHTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-17 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT NEW GYM @ 10,000 SF TBD TBD New TOTAL $ 1,999,953 $ -$ 18,462,600 $ 811,688 $ 21,274,240 $ -$ 21,274,240 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ 399,991 $ -$ 3,692,520 $ 162,338 $ 4,254,848 $ -$ 4,254,848 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ 2,399,943 $ -$ 22,155,120 $ 974,025 $ 25,529,088 $ -$ 25,529,088 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 FS 17Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Nellie N. Coffman Middle School 34-603 Plumley Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234-6326 33 67173 6059091 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 2 B-500 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Permanent ADMINISTRATION 2007 A# 107444 1 7227 Medium Mod.$ 1,409,265 $ 1,409,265 $ 1,409,265 1 B-100 CLASSROOM BUILDING 100 Permanent LIBRARY / OFFICE / CLASSROOM BUILDING 100 1976 A# 36760 1 44378 Medium Mod.$ 8,653,710 $ 8,653,710 $ 8,653,710 2 B-200 CLASSROOM BUILDING 200 Permanent CLASSROOM BUILDING 200 1976 A# 36760 1 20469 Medium Mod.$ 3,991,455 $ 3,991,455 $ 3,991,455 2 B-300 MPR BUILDING 300 Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING 300 1976 A# 36760 1 25482 Medium Mod.$ 4,968,990 $ 4,968,990 $ 4,968,990 1 B-S CHILLER BUILDING Permanent MECHANICAL BUILDING / ENCLOSURE 1977 A# 36760 / 107671 1 2400 2 P-5 RELO 5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 401 2000 A# 69217 1 960 2 P-4 RELO 4 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 402 2000 A# 69217 1 960 2 P-3 RELO 3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 403 2000 A# 69217 1 960 2 P-2 RELO 2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 404 2002 A# 102346 1 960 3 P-1 RELO 1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 405 1998 A# 102346 1 960 Medium Mod.$ 93,600 $ 93,600 2 P-9 RELO 9 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 501 2001 A# 102346 1 960 2 P-8 RELO 8 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 502 2001 A# 105089 1 960 2 P-7 RELO 7 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 503 2002 A# 105089 1 960 2 P-6 RELO 6 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 504 2003 A# 105089 1 960 2 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTERS Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (2)2007 A# 109837 1 1440 5 WW-1 WALKWAY Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1976 A# 36760 1 4380 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New TOTAL $ -$ 17,614,155 $ -$ 1,409,265 $ 19,023,420 $ 93,600 $ 19,117,020 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 3,522,831 $ -$ 281,853 $ 3,804,684 $ 18,720 $ 3,823,404 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 21,136,986 $ -$ 1,691,118 $ 22,828,104 $ 112,320 $ 22,940,424 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 18Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 19Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Agua Caliente Elementary School 30800 San Luis Rey Dr, Cathedral City, CA 9223 33 67173 6032387 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:This is a new school that was constructed on an existing site. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) 1 B-A ADMIN BLDG. 'A'PERMANENT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING A 2018 A# 114748 1 5440 $ -$ - 1 B-B BLDG. 'B'PERMANENT CLASSROOM BUILDING B 2018 A# 114748 2 16276 $ -$ - 1 B-C BLDG. 'C'PERMANENT CLASSROOM BUILDING C 2018 A# 114748 2 15584 $ -$ - 1 B-D BLDG. 'D'PERMANENT CLASSROOM BUILDING D 2018 A# 114748 2 12750 $ -$ - 1 B-E BLDG. 'E'PERMANENT MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING E 2018 A# 114748 1 11277 $ -$ - 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New $ -$ - 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New $ -$ - 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New $ -$ - 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New $ -$ - 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD New $ -$ - TOTAL $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 20Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 21Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Cathedral City Elementary School 69300 Converse Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234-7040 33 67173 6032403 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) 2 B-2 BLDG. '2'Permanent ADMINISTRATION 2000 A# 101036 1 6746 Light Mod.$ 657,735 $ 657,735 $ 657,735 2 B-3 BLDG. '3'Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 2000 A# 101036 1 9074 Light Mod.$ 884,715 $ 884,715 $ 884,715 2 B-4 BLDG. '4'Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-8 2000 A# 101036 1 8935 Light Mod.$ 871,163 $ 871,163 $ 871,163 2 B-5A BLDG. '5A'Permanent CLASSROOMS 11-18 2000 A# 101036 1 8935 Light Mod.$ 871,163 $ 871,163 $ 871,163 2 B-5B BLDG. '5B'Permanent CLASSROOMS 21-28 2000 A# 101036 1 8935 Light Mod.$ 871,163 $ 871,163 $ 871,163 2 B-5C BLDG. '5C'Permanent CLASSROOMS 31-38 2000 A# 101036 1 8935 Light Mod.$ 871,163 $ 871,163 $ 871,163 2 B-6 BLDG. '6'Permanent CLASSROOMS 51-52 2000 A# 101036 1 1118 Light Mod.$ 109,005 $ 109,005 $ 109,005 2 B-7 RESTROOM Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING -PLAYGROUND 2000 A# 101036 1 1512 Light Mod.$ 147,420 $ 147,420 $ 147,420 2 B-8 RESTROOM Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING 2000 A# 101036 1 4386 Light Mod.$ 427,635 $ 427,635 $ 427,635 2 M-1 CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR KDG CLASSROOM 53 2000 A# 102561 1 960 Light Mod.$ 93,600 $ 93,600 $ 93,600 2 M-2 CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR HEADSTART CLASSROOM 1 2000 A# 102561 1 1280 Light Mod.$ 124,800 $ 124,800 $ 124,800 2 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE HEADSTART CLASSROOM 2 2000 A# 101036 1 960 Light Mod.$ 93,600 $ 93,600 $ 93,600 2 M-3 RESTROOM Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS 2000 A# 101036 1 136 Light Mod.$ 13,260 $ 13,260 $ 13,260 2 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 61 2000 A# 106307 1 960 2 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 62 2000 A# 106307 1 960 2 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 63 2000 A# 106307 1 960 2 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 44 2000 A# 105123 1 960 2 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 45 2002 A# 106307 1 960 2 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 46 2002 A# 106307 1 960 1 P-8 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 54 2016 A# 114822 1 960 1 P-9 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 55 2016 A# 114822 1 960 2 SS-1 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (1of 2)2000 A# 101036 1 4364 2 SS-1 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (2 of 2)2000 A# 101036 1 2 WW-1 WALKWAY Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 2000 A# 101036 1 7044 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ 195,000 $ -$ 6,036,420 $ 6,231,420 $ -$ 6,231,420 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 39,000 $ -$ 1,207,284 $ 1,246,284 $ -$ 1,246,284 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 7,243,704 $ 7,477,704 $ -$ 7,477,704 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 22Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 23Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Rio Vista Elementary School 67-700 Verona Rd., Cathedral City, CA 92234-5508 33 67173 0105767 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) 2 B-2 BLDG. '2'Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 2004 A# 103970 1 7031 Light Mod. $ 685,523 $ 685,523 $ 685,523 2 B-3 BLDG. '3'Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 2004 A# 103970 1 7277 Light Mod. $ 709,508 $ 709,508 $ 709,508 2 B-4 BLDG. '4'Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-408 2004 A# 103970 1 8264 Light Mod. $ 805,740 $ 805,740 $ 805,740 2 B-5A BLDG. '5A'Permanent CLASSROOMS 501-508 2004 A# 103970 1 8264 Light Mod. $ 805,740 $ 805,740 $ 805,740 2 B-5B BLDG. '5B'Permanent CLASSROOMS 601-608 2004 A# 103970 1 8264 Light Mod. $ 805,740 $ 805,740 $ 805,740 2 B-9 BLDG. '9'Permanent CLASSROOMS 701-708 2008 A# 108136 1 8269 Light Mod. $ 806,228 $ 806,228 $ 806,228 2 B-7 BLDG. '7'Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING / CUSTODIAL STORAGE 2004 A# 103970 1 2180 Light Mod. $ 212,550 $ 212,550 $ 212,550 2 B-8 BLDG. '8' TOILETS Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING -PLAYGROUND 2004 A# 103970 1 1110 Light Mod. $ 108,225 $ 108,225 $ 108,225 2 B-6 KINDERGARTEN Permanent KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOMS K1-K2 2004 A# 103970 1 3822 Light Mod. $ 372,645 $ 372,645 $ 372,645 1 P-K3 RELO Portable PORTABLE KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOMS K3 2016 A# 114658 1 1440 1 P-K4 RELO Portable PORTABLE KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOMS K4 2016 A# 114658 1 1440 2 M-HS RELO Modular HEADSTART MODULAR 2004 A# 105124 1 1440 3 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P2 1998 A# 107323 1 960 2 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P1 2006 A# 107323 1 960 2 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P3 2008 A# 108847 1 960 2 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P4 2008 A# 108847 1 960 2 WW-1 WALKWAYS Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 2004 A# 103970 1 8054 2 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (1 of 2)2004 A# 103970 1 3036 2 LS-2 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (2 of 2)2004 A# 103970 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD 1 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ 195,000 $ -$ 5,311,898 $ 5,506,898 $ -$ 5,506,898 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 39,000 $ -$ 1,062,380 $ 1,101,380 $ -$ 1,101,380 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 6,374,277 $ 6,608,277 $ -$ 6,608,277 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 24Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 25Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-3000 33 67173 3330818 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) 3 B-F ADMINISTRATION BUILDING F Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1999 A# 66705 1 19626 Medium Mod. $ 3,827,070 $ 3,827,070 $ 3,827,070 3 B-D1 CLASSROOM BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 101-109 ODD 1999 A# 66705 1 5225 Medium Mod. $ 1,018,875 $ 1,018,875 $ 1,018,875 3 B-D2 CLASSROOM BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 102-112 EVEN / 201- 211 ODD, ETC 1999 A# 66705 1 13448 Medium Mod. $ 2,622,360 $ 2,622,360 $ 2,622,360 3 B-DRR RESTROOM Permanent BOYS RESTROOMS 200 1999 A# 66705 1 460 Medium Mod. $ 89,700 $ 89,700 $ 89,700 2 B-D3 CLASSROOM BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 212-216 / 250-254 EVEN 2006 A# 103898 2 5525 Light Mod.$ 538,688 $ 538,688 $ 538,688 2 B-D4 CLASSROOM BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 218-228 / 256-266 2006 A# 103898 2 11050 Light Mod.$ 1,077,375 $ 1,077,375 $ 1,077,375 2 B-D5 CLASSROOM BUILDING D Permanent 200 ELEVATOR / RESTROOMS / OFFICE 2006 A# 103898 2 2040 Light Mod.$ 198,900 $ 198,900 $ 198,900 3 B-ERR RESTROOM Permanent GIRLS RESTROOMS 300 1999 A# 66705 1 460 Medium Mod. $ 89,700 $ 89,700 $ 89,700 3 B-E1 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 302-306 EVEN / 401- 405 ODD, ETC 1999 A# 66705 1 10000 Medium Mod. $ 1,950,000 $ 1,950,000 $ 1,950,000 3 B-E2 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 402-408 EVEN 1999 A# 66705 1 4145 Medium Mod. $ 808,275 $ 808,275 $ 808,275 2 B-E3 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 309-315 / 351-357 ODD 2006 A# 103898 2 7232 Light Mod.$ 705,120 $ 705,120 $ 705,120 2 B-E4 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 410-414 / 450-454 EVEN 2006 A# 103898 2 5472 Light Mod.$ 533,520 $ 533,520 $ 533,520 2 B-E5 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOMS 416-422 / 456-464 EVEN 2006 A# 103898 2 9696 Light Mod.$ 945,360 $ 945,360 $ 945,360 2 B-E6 CLASSROOM BUILDING E Permanent 400 ELEVATOR / RESTROOMS / OFFICE 2006 A# 103898 2 1365 Light Mod.$ 133,088 $ 133,088 $ 133,088 3 B-A1 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 501-505 ODD 1999 A# 66705 1 7033 Medium Mod. $ 1,371,435 $ 1,371,435 $ 1,371,435 3 B-A2 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 507 / 509 1999 A# 66705 1 3360 Medium Mod. $ 655,200 $ 655,200 $ 655,200 3 B-A3 BUILDING A -THEATER Permanent THEATER 1999 A# 66705 1 9752 Medium Mod. $ 1,901,640 $ 1,901,640 $ 1,901,640 3 B-A4 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 506 / 605 1999 A# 66705 1 2014 Medium Mod. $ 392,730 $ 392,730 $ 392,730 3 B-A5 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 602-606 EVEN / KITCHEN 1999 A# 66705 1 7190 Medium Mod. $ 1,402,050 $ 1,402,050 $ 1,402,050 2 B-A6 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CUSTODIAL AREA / RESTROOMS / COMP LAB 2006 A# 103898 1 2464 Light Mod.$ 240,240 $ 240,240 $ 240,240 2 B-A7 CLASSROOM BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 614 / 615 BLACK BOX -Notes: WOOD SHOP & ACTORS STUDIO 2006 A# 103898 1 4659 Light Mod.$ 454,253 $ 454,253 $ 454,253 2 B-A8 BUILDING A -CONFERENCE Permanent CONFERENCE ROOM 616 2006 A# 103898 1 393 Light Mod.$ 38,318 $ 38,318 $ 38,318 3 B-B1 BUILDING B -GYMNASIUM Permanent GYMNASIUM / COMMONS 1999 A# 66705 1 44171 $ 8,613,345 $ 8,613,345 2 B-B2 BUILDING B -WEIGHT ROOM Permanent WRESTLING / WEIGHT ROOM / EQUIP SHELTER 2006 A# 103898 1 3266 $ 318,435 $ 318,435 2 B-C BUILDNG C Electric ELECTRIC BUILDING 2006 A# 103898 1 1160 2 B-H BUILDING H Permanent FOOTBALL CONCESSION / RESTROOMS 2006 A# 103898 1 3003 Light Mod.$ 292,793 $ 292,793 $ 292,793 2 B-G BUILDING G Permanent FOOTBALL HOME LOCKER ROOM 2006 A# 103898 1 1980 Light Mod.$ 193,050 $ 193,050 $ 193,050 2 B-J BUILDING J Permanent FOOTBALL VISITOR LOCKER ROOM 2006 A# 103898 1 1333 Light Mod.$ 129,968 $ 129,968 $ 129,968 3 B-PB PRESSBOX Permanent FOOTBALL PRESSBOX / LIFT 1999 A# 103898 1 240 2 B-GSH GRANDSTANDS Permanent HOME GRANDSTANDS 2006 A# 105800 1 3915 2 B-GSV GRANDSTANDS Permanent VISITOR GRANDSTANDS 2006 A# 105800 1 1215 Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 FS 26Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Desert Hot Springs High School 65850 Pierson Blvd., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-3000 33 67173 3330818 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1- 4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 2 M-1 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 202-208 EVEN 2000 A# 101055 1 3920 Medium Mod. $ 764,400 $ 764,400 $ 764,400 2 M-2 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 301-307 ODD 2001 A# 102561 1 3920 Medium Mod. $ 764,400 $ 764,400 $ 764,400 1 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 430 2019 A# 117464 1 960 1 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 431 2019 A# 117464 1 960 1 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 432 2019 A# 117464 1 960 1 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 433 2019 A# 117464 1 960 2 LS-1 LUNCH Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2006 A# 108236 1 1236 3 WW-1 WALKWAYS Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1999 A# 66705 1 15260 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW -3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW -4 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE WATER MAIN WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT TBD TBD Allowance New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 390,000 0 NEW-5 NEW CONSTRUCTION CTE -BUILD NEW CTE BUILDING -#1 TBD TBD Allowance New $ 3,900,000 $ 3,900,000 0 NEW -6 NEW CONSTRUCTION CTE -BUILD NEW CTE BUILDING -#2 TBD TBD Allowance New 0 NEW -7 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW -8 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE PE/ FIELD LIGHTING TBD TBD New 0 NEW -9 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE EXPLORATORY SPACE @ INTERIOR TBD TBD New 0 NEW -10 SITE IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT SMART BOARDS WITH MONITORS TBD TBD New 0 NEW -11 SITE IMPROVEMENT PERMANENT LIBRARY CONVERSION/ TO PARENT CENTER TBD TBD New 0 NEW -12 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT PE SPACE/ RR/ WESTLING/ WEIGHTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW -13 CONVERSION PERMANENT MODERNIZATION @ OFFICE SPACES/ PROTOTYPE TBD TBD New 0 NEW -14 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT COLLBORATION SPACES TBD TBD New 0 NEW -15 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT NEW CTE BUILDING TBD TBD New 0 NEW -16 NEW CONSTRUCTION POOL NEW POOL TBD TBD New 0 NEW -17 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT PE/ LOCKER ROOM/ SHOWER BUILDING TO SERVE POOL @ 4000 SF TBD TBD New 0 NEW -18 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT SNACK BAR TBD TBD New TOTAL $ 4,095,000 $ -$ 17,852,835 $ 5,480,670 $ 27,428,505 $ 8,931,780 $ 36,360,285 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ 819,000 $ -$ 3,570,567 $ 1,096,134 $ 5,485,701 $ 1,786,356 $ 7,272,057 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ 4,914,000 $ -$ 21,423,402 $ 6,576,804 $ 32,914,206 $ 10,718,136 $ 43,632,342 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 FS 27Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Desert Springs Middle School 66-755 Two Bunch Palms Trail, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-5775 33 67173 6108443 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) 3 B-1 BUILDING 1 ADMIN Permanent ADMINISTRATION 1990 A# 51414 1 4761 Medium Mod. $ 928,395 $ 928,395 $ 928,395 3 B-2 BUILDING 2B MULTI- PURPOSE GYMNASIUM Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE / CLASSROOMS 1990 A# 51414 1 20559 Medium Mod. $ 4,009,005 $ 4,009,005 $ 4,009,005 3 B-3 BUILDING 3 LIBRARY Permanent LIBRARY 1990 A# 51414 1 6259 Medium Mod. $ 1,220,505 $ 1,220,505 $ 1,220,505 3 B-3WE BUILDING 3 EAST/WEST WINGS Permanent CLASSROOMS 201-208 , 209-2013 1990 A# 51414 1 25258 Medium Mod. $ 4,925,310 $ 4,925,310 $ 4,925,310 3 M-C BUILDING C Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 301-306 1990 A# 51056 1 6178 Medium Mod. $ 1,204,710 $ 1,204,710 $ 1,204,710 3 M-B BUILDING B Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 401-406 1990 A# 51056 1 6178 Medium Mod. $ 1,204,710 $ 1,204,710 $ 1,204,710 3 M-A BUILDING A Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 501-506 1990 A# 51056 1 7973 Medium Mod. $ 1,554,735 $ 1,554,735 $ 1,554,735 3 B-D BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 701-710 1991 A# 56983 1 10144 Medium Mod. $ 1,978,080 $ 1,978,080 $ 1,978,080 3 B-E ELECTRICAL Permanent ELECTRICAL BUILDING 1990 A# 51056 1 200 2 P-27 RELO 27 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 801 2002 A# 105252 1 960 2 P-26 RELO 26 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 802 2002 A# 105252 1 960 2 P-25 RELO 25 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 803 2002 A# 105252 1 960 2 P-24 RELO 24 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 804 2000 A# 102348 1 960 2 P-23 RELO 23 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 805 2001 A# 102348 1 960 2 P-22 RELO 22 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 806 2001 A# 102348 1 960 2 M-RR1 RELO RR Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS 800 2006 A# 107690 1 144 Medium Mod. $ 37,440 $ 37,440 $ 37,440 2 P-21 RELO 21 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 808 2000 A# 102348 1 960 4 P-20 RELO 20 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 809 1989 A# 28711 1 960 4 P-19 RELO 19 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 810 1986 A# 51282 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 3 P-18 RELO 18 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 811 1990 A# 29668 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-17 RELO 17 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 812 1989 A# 28718 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 2 P-16 RELO 16 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 813 2001 A# 102348 1 960 2 M-RR2 RELO RR Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS 900 2000 A# 53739 1 144 Medium Mod. $ 37,440 $ 37,440 $ 37,440 2 P-7 RELO 7 Portable PORTABLE STAFF WORKROOM 909 2006 A# 107609 1 960 2 P-RR1 RELO RR Portable RESTROOM PORTABLE 900 2006 A# 108970 1 480 2 P-3 RELO 3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 905 2006 A# 108970 1 960 3 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1990 A# 51414 1 4650 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 NEW CONSTRUCTION PORTABLE NEW (3) CLASSROOM BUILDING/ REPLACE OLD PORTABLES TBD TBD New $ 975,000 $ 975,000 $ 975,000 0 NEW-5 DEMO./REMOVAL PORTABLE PORTABLE DEMO./REMOVAL/ UTILITIES TBD TBD New $ 15,600 $ 15,600 $ 15,600 0 NEW-6 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SITE IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE FOR NEW CLASSROOMS TBD TBD New $ 9,750 $ 9,750 $ 9,750 TOTAL $ -$ -$ 18,025,800 $ 104,832 $ 18,130,632 $ -$18,130,632 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ -$ 3,605,160 $ 20,966 $ 3,626,126 $ -$ 3,626,126 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ -$ 21,630,960 $ 125,798 $ 21,756,758 $ -$21,756,758 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 28Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 29Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Painted Hills Middle School 9250 Sonora Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-1585 33 67173 0123703 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 1 B-1000-2000 MAIN BUILDING 1000-2000 WING Permanent MAIN BUILDING 1000-2000 WING 2013 A# 1093912 2 101730 Newer Site/ No Mod. 1 B-3000 3000 BUILDING Permanent 3000 BUILDING 2011 A# 1093912 2 26507 Newer Site/ No Mod. 1 LS-1 Lunch Shelter Permanent Lunch Shelter 2013 A# 113015 1 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New $13,000 $13,000 $ 13,000 0 NEW-3 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New TOTAL $ -$ -$ -$13,000 $13,000 $ -$ 13,000 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ -$ -$ 2,600 $ 2,600 $ -$ 2,600 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ -$ -$15,600 $15,600 $ -$ 15,600 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 30Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 31Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Bella Vista Elementary School 65750 Avenida Jalisco Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-1674 33 67173 6032429 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 1 B-1A MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MAIN BUILDING:2014 A# 109313 2 83153 Newer Site/ No Mod. All areas are within one building SF. 1 B-1B CLASSROOM WING-1 (1st & 2nd FLOOR)Permanent Food Service 2014 A# 109313 1 1 B-1C LIBRARY Permanent Multi-Purpose 2014 A# 109313 1 1 B-1D ADMINISTRATION (1st & 2nd FLOOR) Permanent Classroom Wing #1 2014 A# 109313 2 1 B-1E CLASSROOM WING-2 (1st & 2nd FLOOR)Permanent Library 2014 A# 109313 1 1 B-1F KINDERGARTEN Permanent Administration 2014 A# 109313 1 1 P-1 RELO Modular Modular Building 2017 A# 114694 1 960 1 P-2 RELO Modular Modular Building 2017 A# 114694 1 960 1 P-3 RELO Modular Modular Building 2017 A# 114694 1 960 1 LS-1 Lunch Shelter Shelter Lunch Shelter 2014 A# 109313 1 3000 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD 300 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ 195,000 $ -$ -$ 195,000 $ -$ 195,000 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 39,000 $ -$ -$ 39,000 $ -$ 39,000 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 234,000 $ -$ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 234,000 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 32Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 33Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Bubbling Wells Elementary School 67501 Camino Campanero, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-6869 33 67173 6111025 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) 3 B-1 ADMINISTRATION Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1992 A# 52416 1 5690 Medium Mod. $ 1,109,550 $ 1,109,550 $ 1,109,550 3 B-2 MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1992 A# 52416 1 7186 Medium Mod. $ 1,868,360 $ 1,868,360 $ 1,868,360 2 B-3A CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 11-13, 21-23 1992 A# 52416 1 2600 Medium Mod. $ 507,000 $ 507,000 $ 507,000 2 B-3B CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 14-15, 24-25 1992 A# 52416 1 3060 Medium Mod. $ 596,700 $ 596,700 $ 596,700 3 B-4A CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOM 31-33 1992 A# 52416 1 1260 Medium Mod. $ 245,700 $ 245,700 $ 245,700 3 B-4B CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 34-36 1992 A# 52416 / A# 110280 1 6120 Medium Mod. $ 1,193,400 $ 1,193,400 $ 1,193,400 3 B-5A CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-3 1992 A# 52416 / A# 110280 1 3600 Medium Mod. $ 702,000 $ 702,000 $ 702,000 3 B-5B CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 4-5 1992 A# 52416 1 3060 Medium Mod. $ 596,700 $ 596,700 $ 596,700 3 B-6 KINDERGARTEN Permanent CLASSROOM K-1-K-2 1992 A# 52416 1 1260 Medium Mod. $ 245,700 $ 245,700 $ 245,700 4 P-1 RELO 1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 34 1980 A# 47710 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-2 RELO 2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 35 1988 A# 50418 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-3 RELO 3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 41 1988 A# 50989 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-4 RELO 4 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 42 1988 A# 50989 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-5 RELO 5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 43 1988 A# 51597 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-6 RELO 6 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 44 1988 A# 50585 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-7 RELO 7 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 45 1988 A# 50585 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-8 RELO 8 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 46 1988 A# 50418 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-9 RELO 9 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 5 1989 A# 52416 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 3 P-10 RELO 10 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 51 1990 A# 29638 1 960 3 P-11 RELO 11 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 52 1995 A# 102348 1 2120 3 P-12 RELO 10 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 53 1998 A# 50418 1 960 3 P-13 RELO 11 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 54 1998 A# 50418 1 960 3 P-14 RELO 14 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 55 1998 A# 26435 1 960 3 P-15 RELO 15 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 56 1998 A# 107810 1 960 3 P-16 RELO 16 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 57 1998 A# 108753 1 960 3 P-17 RELO 17 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 58 1998 A# 108877 1 960 1 P-18 RELO 18 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 59 2015 A# 108877 1 960 1 P-19 RELO 19 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 60 2015 A# 113946 1 960 1 P-20 RELO 20 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 61 2015 A# 113946 1 960 3 P-21 RELO 21 Portable CHILD CARE 1992 A# 52416 1 960 3 LS-1 LUNCH Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1992 A# 108435 1 1032 RELO 1 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD 1 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 0 NEW-6 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT NEW (9) CLASSROOM BUILDING/ REPLACE OLD PORTABLES TBD TBD 10000 New $ 6,500,000 $ 6,500,000 $ 6,500,000 0 NEW-7 DEMO./REMOVAL PERMANENT PORTABLE DEMO./REMOVAL/ UTILITIESS TBD TBD 9 New $ 46,800 $ 46,800 $ 46,800 0 NEW-8 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SITE IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE FOR NEW CLASSROOMS TBD TBD 1 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ 195,000 $ 5,961,410 $ 7,935,356 $ 14,091,766 $ -$14,091,766 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 39,000 $ 1,192,282 $ 1,587,071 $ 2,818,353 $ -$ 2,818,353 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 234,000 $ 7,153,692 $ 9,522,427 $ 16,910,119 $ -$16,910,119 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 34Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 35Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Cabot Yerxa Elementary School 67067 Desert View, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-4103 33 67173 0118943 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 2 B-M BLDG. 'M' -MULTI- PURPOSE Permanent ADMINISTRATION / MULTI-PURPOSE 2009 A# 108879 1 12541 Light Mod. $ 2,037,913 $ 2,037,913 $ 2,037,913 2 B-L BLDG. 'L' –LIBRARY Permanent LIBRARY 2009 A# 108879 1 3802 Light Mod. $ 370,695 $ 370,695 $ 370,695 2 B-K1 BLDG. 'K1'KINDER.Permanent CLASSROOMS 305-308 2009 A# 108879 1 6770 Light Mod. $ 660,075 $ 660,075 $ 660,075 2 B-K2 BLDG. 'K2'KINDER.Permanent CLASSROOMS 301-304 2009 A# 108879 1 6770 Light Mod. $ 660,075 $ 660,075 $ 660,075 2 B-C1 BLDG. 'C1' –CLASSROOMS Permanent CLASSROOMS 601-605 2009 A# 108879 1 13165 Light Mod. $ 1,283,588 $ 1,283,588 $ 1,283,588 2 B-C2 BLDG. 'C2' –CLASSROOMS Permanent CLASSROOMS 501-508 2009 A# 108879 1 10138 Light Mod. $ 988,455 $ 988,455 $ 988,455 2 B-C3 BLDG. 'C3' –CLASSROOMS Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-412 2009 A# 108879 1 5056 Light Mod. $ 492,960 $ 492,960 $ 492,960 1 P-1 RELO Portable CLASSROOM 701 2016 A# 114738 1 960 1 P-2 RELO Portable CLASSROOM 702 2016 A# 114738 1 960 1 P-3 RELO Portable CLASSROOM 703 2016 A# 114738 1 960 2 B-S LUNCH STRUCTURE Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2009 A# 108879 1 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ 195,000 $ -$ 6,493,760 $ 6,688,760 $ -$ 6,688,760 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 39,000 $ -$ 1,298,752 $ 1,337,752 $ -$ 1,337,752 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 7,792,512 $ 8,026,512 $ -$ 8,026,512 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 36Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 37Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Julius Corsini Elementary School 68750 Hacienda Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-6551 33 67173 6102560 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 2 B-1 ADMINISTRATION Permanent ADMINISTRATION 1993 A# 53209 1 2900 Medium Mod. $ 565,500 $ 565,500 $ 565,500 2 B-2 LIBRARY / RESTROOMS Permanent LIBRARY / RESTROOMS 2006 A# 107672 1 5300 Medium Mod. $ 1,378,000 $ 1,378,000 $ 1,378,000 2 B-3 KINDERGARTEN Permanent KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOMS KA-KB 1993 A# 53209 1 2560 Medium Mod. $ 665,600 $ 665,600 $ 665,600 2 B-5C MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1983 A# 45397 2 188 Light Mod. $ 30,550 $ 30,550 $ 30,550 2 B-A CLASSROOM Modular CLASSROOMS 101-105, 201-205 2003 A# 103921 2 10712 Light Mod. $ 1,044,420 $ 1,044,420 $ 1,044,420 2 B-B CLASSROOM Modular CLASSROOMS 106-107, 206-207 2003 A# 103921 2 7744 Light Mod. $ 755,040 $ 755,040 $ 755,040 2 B-C CLASSROOM Modular CLASSROOMS 108-109, 208-209 2004 A# 105148 2 11712 Light Mod. $ 1,141,920 $ 1,141,920 $ 1,141,920 2 B-D CLASSROOM Modular CLASSROOMS 110-115, 210-215 2004 A# 105148 2 1920 Light Mod. $ 187,200 $ 187,200 $ 187,200 2 B-E CLASSROOM Modular CLASSROOMS 301-304, 305-308 2006 A# 107672 1 3872 Light Mod. $ 377,520 $ 377,520 $ 377,520 2 B-M SPECIAL PROGRAMS RELO Modular CHILD CARE 1986 A# 26428 1 1800 Light Mod. $ 175,500 $ 175,500 $ 175,500 2 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2003 A# 103921 1 2210 2 LS-2 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2003 A# 103921 1 2210 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ 1,573,000 $ 1,231,100 $ 3,712,150 $ 6,516,250 $ -$ 6,516,250 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 314,600 $ 246,220 $ 742,430 $ 1,303,250 $ -$ 1,303,250 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 1,887,600 $ 1,477,320 $ 4,454,580 $ 7,819,500 $ -$ 7,819,500 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 38Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 39Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-5655 33 67173 6115448 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building # Building- Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 3 B-1 BLDG. '1' ADMIN.Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1998 A# 65937 1 5963 Medium Mod. $ 1,162,785 $ 1,162,785 $ 1,162,785 3 B-2 BLDG. '2' MULTI- PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1998 A# 65937 1 7579 Medium Mod. $ 1,477,905 $ 1,477,905 $ 1,477,905 3 M-3A BLDG. '3A’ CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 10-12 / 20-22 1998 A# 65937 1 6180 Medium Mod. $ 1,205,100 $ 1,205,100 $ 1,205,100 3 M-3B BLDG. '3B' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 13-14 / 23-24 1998 A# 65937 1 3600 Medium Mod. $ 702,000 $ 702,000 $ 702,000 3 M-5A BLDG. '5A' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 30-32 1998 A# 65937 1 3090 Medium Mod. $ 602,550 $ 602,550 $ 602,550 3 M-5B BLDG. '5B’ CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 33-35 1998 A# 65937 1 3275 Medium Mod. $ 638,625 $ 638,625 $ 638,625 3 M-7 BLDG. '7' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 40-42 1998 A# 65937 1 2920 Medium Mod. $ 569,400 $ 569,400 $ 569,400 2 M-6 BLDG. '6' KINDERGARTEN Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS K1-K2 2005 A# 107711 / A# 65937 1 2784 Light Mod. $ 271,440 $ 271,440 $ 271,440 2 M-K BLDG. 'K' KINDER.Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS K3-K4 / 103 2005 A# 105371 1 3480 Light Mod. $ 339,300 $ 339,300 $ 339,300 3 M-HS RELO Modular HEAD START MODULAR 1998 A# 110728 1 1920 Medium Mod. $ 374,400 $ 374,400 $ 374,400 2 M-RR RELO Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS 2004 A# 113945 1 144 Light Mod. $ 14,040 $ 14,040 $ 14,040 3 M-4A BLGD. '4A'Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 1-3 1998 A# 65937 1 Medium Mod. 3 M-4B BLGD. '4B'Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 4-6 1998 A# 65937 1 Medium Mod. 4 P-HS RELO -HEAD START Portable HEAD START PORTABLE 1986 A# 115027 1 1360 Demo. $ 132,600 $ 132,600 $ 132,600 2 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P3 2004 A# 101984 1 960 2 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P4 2004 A# 104946 1 960 2 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P5 2004 A# 104946 1 960 2 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P6 2004 A# 108107 1 960 2 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P7 2004 A# 108107 1 960 2 P-8 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P8 2004 A# 51282 1 960 3 P-9 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 43 1998 A# 102902 1 960 2 P-10 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 44 2003 A# 105266 1 960 2 P-11 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 45 2000 A# 108107 1 960 2 P-12 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 46 2000 A# 108107 1 960 2 P-13 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 47 2000 A# 108107 1 960 2 P-14 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 48 2001 A# 102346 1 960 1 P-15 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOMS K6 2016 A# 115026 1 960 1 SS-1 SHADE STRUCTURE Shelter LUNCH SHELTER (1 of 2)2014 A# 113644 1 2400 1 SS-2 SHADE STRUCTURE Shelter LUNCH SHELTER (2 of 2)2014 A# 113644 Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 FS 40Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Two Bunch Palms Elementary School 14250 West Dr., Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-5655 33 67173 6115448 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD 300 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 0 NEW-6 NEW CONSTRUCTION PORTABLE NEW (1)CLASSROOM BUILDING/ REPLACE OLD PORTABLES TBD TBD 960 New $ 325,000 $ 325,000 $ 325,000 0 NEW-7 DEMO./REMOVAL PERMANENT / Or PORTABLE PORTABLE DEMO./REMOVAL/ UTILITIES TBD TBD 9 New $ 5,200 $ 5,200 $ 5,200 0 NEW-8 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SITE IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE FOR NEW CLASSROOMS TBD TBD 1 New $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 TOTAL $ -$ 590,200 $ 6,732,765 $ 757,380 $ 8,080,345 $ -$ 8,080,345 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 118,040 $ 1,346,553 $ 151,476 $ 1,616,069 $ -$ 1,616,069 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 708,240 $ 8,079,318 $ 908,856 $ 9,696,414 $ -$ 9,696,414 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 FS 41Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Palm Springs High School 2401 East Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262-7217 33 67173 3335130 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 3 B-C BUILDING C Permanent ADMINISTRATION 1997 A# 62054 1 10150 Medium Mod. $ 1,979,250 $ 1,979,250 $ 1,979,250 3 B-A BUILDING A Permanent CLASSROOMS 201-250 1997 A# 62054 1 36654 Medium Mod. $ 7,147,530 $ 7,147,530 $ 7,147,530 3 B-B BUILDING B Permanent CLASSROOMS 301-303 1997 A# 62054 1 5075 Medium Mod. $ 989,625 $ 989,625 $ 989,625 3 B-D BUILDING D Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-410 1997 A# 62054 1 12475 Medium Mod. $ 2,432,625 $ 2,432,625 $ 2,432,625 3 B-E BUILDING E Permanent CLASSROOM 500 BUILDING 1997 A# 62054 1 3460 Medium Mod. $ 674,700 $ 674,700 $ 674,700 3 B-G BUILDING G Permanent CLASSROOMS 601-609 1997 A# 62054 1 13821 Medium Mod. $ 2,695,095 $ 2,695,095 $ 2,695,095 3 B-F BUILDING F Permanent CLASSROOMS 701-706 1997 A# 62054 1 13078 Medium Mod. $ 2,550,210 $ 2,550,210 $ 2,550,210 3 B-H BUILDING H Permanent CLASSROOMS 801-808 1999 A# 62054 1 15846 Medium Mod. $ 3,089,970 $ 3,089,970 $ 3,089,970 3 B-M BUILDING M Permanent MUSIC BUILDING 1955 A# 15188 1 7989 Extensive. Mod. $ 2,596,425 $ 2,596,425 $ 2,596,425 1 B-AUD AUDITORIUM Permanent RICHARDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS AUDITORIUM 1958 A# 15188 1 18648 3 B-Q BLACK BOX THEATER Permanent BLACK BOX THEATER 1997 A# 62054 1 3337 Medium Mod. $ 650,715 $ 650,715 $ 650,715 1 B-PA PERFORMING ARTS BUILDING Permanent PERFORMING ARTS BUILDINGS 2013 A# 111214 1 9957 5 B-L BUILDING L Permanent LIBRARY 1958 A# 18535 1 7213 Extensive. Mod. $ 1,406,535 $ 1,406,535 $ 1,406,535 5 B-S BUILDING S Permanent ASB CLASSROOMS / STUDENT STORE 1948 A# 47394 1 4061 Extensive. Mod. $ 791,895 $ 791,895 $ 791,895 5 B-K BUILDING K Permanent CAFETERIA / MULTI-PURPOSE 1948 A# 47394 1 9447 Extensive. Mod. $ 1,842,165 $ 1,842,165 $ 1,842,165 3 B-PE P.E. BUILDING Permanent PE LOCKER ROOMS 1999 A# 62054 1 15331 Medium Mod. $ 2,989,545 $ 2,989,545 $ 2,989,545 5 B-J GYMNASIUM Permanent PAUL SUMMERS GYMNASIUM 1975 A# 62054 1 23104 Extensive. Mod. $ 4,505,280 $ 4,505,280 $ 4,505,280 3 B-J-RR BUILDING J RR Permanent GYM RESTROOM BUILDING 1997 A# 62054 1 884 Medium Mod. $ 172,380 $ 172,380 $ 172,380 3 B-T QUAD TOWER Permanent QUAD TOWER 1999 A# 62054 3 361 Medium Mod. $ 70,395 $ 70,395 $ 70,395 3 B-N-1 RESTROOM Permanent QUAD RESTROOM BUILDING (BY 200'S)1999 A# 62054 1 966 Medium Mod. $ 188,370 $ 188,370 $ 188,370 3 B-N-2 RESTROOM Permanent QUAD RESTROOM BUILDING (BY 700'S)1999 A# 62054 1 966 Medium Mod. $ 188,370 $ 188,370 $ 188,370 3 B-DO-B1 DUGOUT Permanent BASEBALL 1B DUGOUT 1997 A# 104897 1 473 3 B-DO-B2 DUGOUT Permanent BASEBALL 3B DUGOUT 1997 A# 104897 1 806 3 B-DO-S1 DUGOUT Permanent SOFTBALL 1B DUGOUT 1997 A# 104897 1 473 3 B-DO-S3 DUGOUT Permanent SOFTBALL 3B DUGOUT 1997 A# 104897 1 806 5 B-GS-H GRANDSTANDS Permanent HOME GRANDSTANDS 1964 1 11440 5 B-GS-V GRANDSTANDS Permanent VISITOR GRANDSTANDS 1964 1 5213 3 B-600 BUILDING 600 Permanent CLASSROOMS 900-904 1968 A# 14469 1 1 B-RR RESTROOM Permanent MODULAR RESTROOM BUILDING 2019 A# 115641 1 3 SS-1 BUILDING R Permanent SHOP SHELTER 1999 A# 62054 1 2280 3 LS-2 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1997 A# 62054 1 2752 3 LS-1 BUILDING K Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1997 A# 62054 1 1912 3 WW-1 WALKWAY Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1997 A# 62054 1 11088 3 WW-2 ENTRANCE Walkway ENTRANCE / GATE CANOPIES 1997 A# 62054 1 2310 1 B-RR RESTROOM Permanent MODULAR RESTROOM BUILDING 2019 A# 115641 1 B-FB FIELD BUILDING Permanent FOOTBALL TEAM ROOM BUILDING 100 2015 A# 113346 1 B-CB CONCESSIONS Permanent CONCESSION BUILDING 200 2015 A# 113346 FS 42Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Palm Springs High School 2401 East Baristo Rd., Palm Springs, CA 92262-7217 33 67173 3335130 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE RESURFACE TRACK TBD TBD New 0 NEW-6 SITE IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT INTERIOR GYM RETRACTABLE BLEACHERS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-7 SITE IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT NEW LOCKERS @ GYM TBD TBD New 0 NEW-8 SITE IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT NEW SCOREBOARD TBD TBD New 0 NEW-9 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE PE/ FIELD LIGHTING TBD TBD New 0 NEW-10 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE EXPLORATORY SPACE @ INTERIOR TBD TBD New 0 NEW-11 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT NEW GYM @ 10,000 SF TBD TBD New 0 NEW-12 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT NEW PRESS BOX @ 400 SF TBD TBD New TOTAL $ -$ 6,637,020 $ 25,168,065 $ 5,155,995 $ 36,961,080 $ -$ 36,961,080 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 1,327,404 $ 5,033,613 $ 1,031,199 $ 7,392,216 $ -$ 7,392,216 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 7,964,424 $ 30,201,678 $ 6,187,194 $ 44,353,296 $ -$ 44,353,296 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. FS 43Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Raymond Cree Middle School 1011 Vista Chino, Palm Springs, CA 92262-3207 33 67173 6059109 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) 3 B-100,200,300,400 MAIN ACADEMICS ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Permanent ADMINISTRATION / CLASSROOMS 201-318 / LIBRARY 1011 1968 A# 27116 1 57162 Extensive Mod. $ 18,577,650 $ 18,577,650 $ 18,577,650 3 RCOE RCOE -400 BLDG Permanent 400 BUILDING -COE / MEDICAL THERAPY UNIT 1980 N/A 1 11000 Extensive Mod. $ 3,575,000 $ 3,575,000 $ 3,575,000 3 B-500 500 BLDG Permanent 500 BUILDING -MULTI-PURPOSE / CLASSROOMS 1968 A# 64253 1 21775 Extensive Mod. $ 7,076,875 $ 7,076,875 $ 7,076,875 3 B-600 600 BLDG Permanent 600 BUILDING -CLASSROOMS 1968 A# 27116 1 6588 Extensive Mod. $ 2,141,100 $ 2,141,100 $ 2,141,100 3 B-800 GYMNASIUM Permanent GYMNASIUM / STAGE 1968 A# 61120 1 17991 Extensive Mod. $ 8,185,905 $ 8,185,905 $ 8,185,905 3 B-700 MUSIC BUILDING Permanent MUSIC BUILDING / STAGE SHELTER 1968 A# 27116 1 11340 Extensive Mod. $ 5,159,700 $ 5,159,700 $ 5,159,700 1 B-900 900 BUILDING Permanent 900 BUILDING -CLASSROOMS 2017 A# 114233 1 5 WW-1 WALKWAY Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1968 A# 27116 1 10960 Extensive Mod. $ 712,400 $ 712,400 $ 712,400 0 NEW -1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD 0 NEW -2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD TOTAL $ 27,795,625 $ 16,920,605 $ 712,400 $ -$ 45,428,630 $ -$ 45,428,630 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ 5,559,125 $ 3,384,121 $ 142,480 $ -$ 9,085,726 $ -$ 9,085,726 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ 33,354,750 $ 20,304,726 $ 854,880 $ -$ 54,514,356 $ -$ 54,514,356 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 44Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 45Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Cahuilla Elementary School 833 East Mesquite Ave., Palm Springs, CA 92264-8414 33 67173 6032395 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 2 B-2 BLDG '2' -ADMIN. / LIBRARY Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 2002 A# 100352 1 6196 Light Mod.$ 604,110 $ 604,110 $ 604,110 2 B-3 BLDG '3' -MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 2002 A# 100352 1 6513 Light Mod.$ 635,018 $ 635,018 $ 635,018 2 B-4 BLDG '4' -CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOM 12-14, 20-23 2002 A# 100352 1 408 Light Mod.$ 39,780 $ 39,780 $ 39,780 2 B-4 BLDG '4' -CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOM 12-15, 24-26 2002 A# 100352 1 2770 Light Mod.$ 270,075 $ 270,075 $ 270,075 2 B-5 KINDERGARTEN Permanent CLASSROOMS K1-K2 2002 A# 100352 2 11376 Light Mod.$ 1,109,160 $ 1,109,160 $ 1,109,160 2 B-7 BLDG '7' -CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-3 2002 A# 100352 2 10793 $ -$ - 3 M-1 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P5 1999 A# 101533 1 960 $ -$ - 3 M-2 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P7 1999 A# 101533 1 960 $ -$ - 3 M-3 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P4 1999 A# 101533 1 960 $ -$ - 3 M-4 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P6 1999 A# 101533 1 960 $ -$ - 3 M-7 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P17 1999 A# 101533 1 960 $ -$ - 3 M-8 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P19 1999 A# 101533 1 960 $ -$ - 3 M-9 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P16 1999 A# 101533 1 960 $ -$ - 3 M-10 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOM P18 1999 A# 101533 1 960 $ -$ - 3 M-11 RELO-ECE Modular CLASSROOM 1999 A# 100352 1 1440 $ -$ - 2 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P-1 2002 A# 105145 1 960 $ -$ - 2 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM P-2 2002 A# 105145 1 960 $ -$ - 2 SS-1 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 2002 A# 100352 1 2813 $ -$ - $ -$ - 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New $ -$ -$ - 0 NEW-2 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New $ -$ -$ - 0 NEW-3 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New $ -$ -$ - 0 NEW-4 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ 195,000 $ -$ 2,658,143 $ 2,853,143 $ -$ 2,853,143 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 39,000 $ -$ 531,629 $ 570,629 $ -$ 570,629 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 3,189,771 $ 3,423,771 $ -$ 3,423,771 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Page intentionally left blank. FS 46Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 47Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Cielo Vista Charter School 650 South Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264-1406 33 67173 6032411 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 3 B-A BLDG. 'A'Permanent ADMINISTRATION 1955 A# 61187 1 3280 Extensive Mod. $ 1,066,000 $ 1,066,000 $ 1,066,000 3 B-C BLDG. 'C'Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1955 A# 61187 1 4690 Extensive Mod. $ 1,524,250 $ 1,524,250 $ 1,524,250 3 B-B BLDG. 'B'Permanent LIBRARY / PSYCHOLOGY 1955 A# 61187 1 3613 Extensive Mod. $ 1,174,225 $ 1,174,225 $ 1,174,225 3 B-D BLDG. 'D'Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-4 / RR 1955 A# 61187 1 5834 Extensive Mod. $ 1,896,050 $ 1,896,050 $ 1,896,050 3 B-E BLDG. 'E'Permanent CLASSROOMS 5-8 / RR 1955 A# 61187 1 5834 Extensive Mod. $ 1,896,050 $ 1,896,050 $ 1,896,050 3 B-F BLDG. 'F'Permanent CLASSROOMS 9-10 1955 A# 61187 1 2405 Extensive Mod. $ 781,625 $ 781,625 $ 781,625 3 B-G BLDG. 'G'Permanent CLASSROOMS 11-14 1955 A# 61187 1 4778 Extensive Mod. $ 1,552,850 $ 1,552,850 $ 1,552,850 3 B-L COMMUNITY CHILD CARE CENTER Permanent CIELO VISTA COMMUNITY CHILD CARE CENTER 1980 1 5053 Extensive Mod. $ 1,642,225 $ 1,642,225 $ 1,642,225 3 B-K BLDG. 'K'Permanent KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOMS 1995 A# 61187 1 3108 Medium Mod.$ 606,060 $ 606,060 $ 606,060 3 P-15 HEAD START RELO Portable HEADSTART PORTABLE 1998 1 960 3 M-SE RELO Modular SPECIAL EDUCATION MODULAR RM 15/15A 1984 A# 45654 1 1280 Medium Mod.$ 249,600 $ 249,600 $ 249,600 3 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 16 1997 A# 61187 1 960 3 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 17 1997 A# 57293 1 960 3 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 18 1997 A# 57293 1 960 3 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 19 1997 A# 51282 1 960 3 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 20 1997 A# 50418 1 960 3 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 21 1997 A# 50989 1 960 3 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 22 1997 A# 51282 1 960 3 P-8 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 23 1997 A# 51282 1 960 3 P-9 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 28 1997 A# 50418 1 960 2 P-10 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 29 2003 A# 102347 1 960 2 P-11 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 30 2003 A# 102347 1 960 3 P-12 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 24 1997 A# 68435 1 960 3 P-13 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 25 1997 A# 68435 1 960 3 P-14 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 26 1997 A# 68435 1 960 3 P-15 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 27 1997 A# 68435 1 960 1 P-16 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 31 2015 A# 114172 1 960 1 P-17 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 32 2015 A# 114172 1 960 1 P-18 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 33 2015 A# 114172 1 960 1 P-19 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 34 2015 A# 114172 1 960 1 P-20 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 35 2015 A# 114172 1 960 1 P-21 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 36 / 36A 2015 A# 114172 1 1440 FS 48Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Cielo Vista Charter School 650 South Paseo Dorotea, Palm Springs, CA 92264-1406 33 67173 6032411 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 3 WW-1 Passage Passage COVERED WALKWAYS 1995 A# 61187 1 12000 2 LS-1 Shelter Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS 2009 A# 108434 1 1942 2 LS-2 Shelter Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS 2009 A# 108434 1 1942 2 LS-3 Shelter Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS 2009 A# 108434 1 1942 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD 1 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 0 NEW -6 NEW CONSTRUCTION PORTABLE NEW (1) CLASSROOM BUILDING/ REPLACE OLD PORTABLES TBD TBD 1 New $ 325,000 $ 325,000 $ 325,000 0 NEW -7 DEMO./REMOVAL PORTABLE PORTABLE DEMO./REMOVAL/ UTILITIESS TBD TBD 1 New $ 5,200 $ 5,200 $ 5,200 0 NEW -8 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SITE IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE FOR NEW CLASSROOMS TBD TBD 1 New $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 TOTAL $ 11,533,275 $ 195,000 $ 855,660 $ 395,200 $ 12,979,135 $ -$ 12,979,135 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ 2,306,655 $ 39,000 $ 171,132 $ 79,040 $ 2,595,827 $ -$ 2,595,827 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ 13,839,930 $ 234,000 $ 1,026,792 $ 474,240 $ 15,574,962 $ -$ 15,574,962 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. FS 49Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Katherine Finchy Elementary School 777 East Tachevah Dr., Palm Springs, CA 92262-4903 33 67173 6032437 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 1 B-2 BLDG. '2'Permanent ADMINISTRATION 1999 A# 63098 1 6284 1 B-3 BLDG. '3'Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1999 A# 63098 1 7140 3 B-4A BLDG. '4A'Permanent CLASSROOMS 201-208 1999 A# 63098 1 10124 Light Mod. $ 987,090 $ 987,090 $ 987,090 3 B-5B BLDG. '5B'Permanent CLASSROOMS 301-308 1999 A# 63098 1 8935 Light Mod. $ 871,163 $ 871,163 $ 871,163 3 B-5C BLDG. '5C'Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-408 1999 A# 63098 1 8935 Light Mod. $ 871,163 $ 871,163 $ 871,163 3 B-6 BLDG. '7'Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING 1999 A# 63098 1 1118 Light Mod. $ 109,005 $ 109,005 $ 109,005 3 B-7 BLDG. '8'Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING -PLAYGROUND 1999 A# 63098 1 881 Light Mod. $ 85,898 $ 85,898 $ 85,898 3 B-8 BLDG. '3'Permanent LUNCH SHADE RESTROOM BUILDING 1999 A# 63098 1 3969 Light Mod. $ 386,978 $ 386,978 $ 386,978 3 P-1 RELO Portable HEADSTART PORTABLE 1998 A# 100132 1 960 4 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 906 1989 A# 54490 1 960 3 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 905 1998 A# 101580 1 960 3 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 904 1998 A# 101580 1 960 3 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 905 1998 A# 101580 1 960 3 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 906 1998 A# 101580 1 960 3 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 907 1998 A# 52493 1 960 1 P-8 RELO K1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM KINDERGARTEN (605)2016 A# 114659 1 1440 1 P-9 RELO K2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM KINDERGARTEN (606)2016 A# 114659 1 1440 2 SS-1 SHADE STRUCT Shelter SHADE STRUCTURES (1 of 3)2007 A# 109025 1 2100 2 SS-2 SHADE STRUCT Shelter SHADE STRUCTURES (2 of 3)2007 A# 109025 1 2 SS-3 SHADE STRUCT Shelter SHADE STRUCTURES (3 of 3)2007 A# 109025 1 3 LS-1 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (1 of 2)1999 A# 63098 1 3036 3 LS-2 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTERS (2 of 2)1999 A# 63098 1 3 WW-1 Walkway Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1999 A# 63098 1 7477 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ 195,000 $ -$ 3,311,295 $ 3,506,295 $ -$ 3,506,295 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 39,000 $ -$ 662,259 $ 701,259 $ -$ 701,259 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 234,000 $ -$ 3,973,554 $ 4,207,554 $ -$ 4,207,554 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 50Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 51Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Vista Del Monte Elementary School 2744 North Via Miraleste, Palm Springs, CA 92262-2274 33 67173 6032452 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1- 4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1- 4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 3 B-1 BLDG. 'D' ADMIN.Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY / MULTIPURPOSE 1963 A# 61286 1 9136 Extensive Mod.$ 890,760 $ 890,760 $ 890,760 3 B-6 BLDG. 'B'Permanent CLASSROOM K-1 1963 A# 61286 1 1813 Extensive Mod.$ 589,225 $ 589,225 $ 589,225 3 B-5 BLDG. 'A'Permanent CLASSROOM K-2 1994 A# 58742 / 61286 1 1472 Extensive Mod.$ 478,400 $ 478,400 $ 478,400 3 B-4 BLDG. 'C'Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-5 1963 A# 61286 1 5676 Extensive Mod.$ 1,844,700 $ 1,844,700 $ 1,844,700 3 B-2 BLDG. 'E'Permanent CLASSROOMS 6-10 1963 A# 61286 1 5676 Extensive Mod.$ 1,844,700 $ 1,844,700 $ 1,844,700 3 M-1 MODULAR Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 11-12 1974 A# 36360 1 1920 Demo.$ 19,968 $ 19,968 $ 19,968 3 M-2 MODULAR Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 13-14 1978 A# 40643 1 1920 Demo.$ 19,968 $ 19,968 $ 19,968 3 M-3 MODULAR Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 15-17 1972 A# 34265 1 2896 Demo.$ 30,118 $ 30,118 $ 30,118 3 M-4 MODULAR Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 18-21 1974 A# 40643 / 54968 / 58985 1 3840 Demo.$ 39,936 $ 39,936 $ 39,936 4 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 22 1988 A# 54968 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 29 1995 A# 54968 1 960 3 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 23 1990 A# 53739 / 62298 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 24 1989 A# 51283 / 61286 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 25 1988 A# 62298 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 26 1988 A# 62298 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 2 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 33 2000 A# 102347 1 960 2 P-8 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 34 2000 A# 102347 1 960 1 P-9 RELO Portable PORTABLE RESTROOM KINDERGARTEN 2016 A# 114693 1 480 5 LS-1 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1974 A# 58052 / 61286 1 1536 Extensive Mod.$ 99,840 $ 99,840 $ 99,840 5 WW-1 WALKWAY Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1963 A# 61286 1 1500 Extensive Mod.$ 97,500 $ 97,500 $ 97,500 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD 1 New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD 300 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 0 NEW-6 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT NEW (5)CLASSROOM BUILDING/ REPLACE OLD PORTABLES TBD TBD 6000 New $ 6,500,000 $ 6,500,000 $ 6,500,000 0 NEW-7 DEMO./REMOVAL PERMANENT / Or PORTABLE PORTABLE DEMO./REMOVAL/ UTILITIES TBD TBD 6 New $ 46,800 $ 46,800 $ 46,800 0 NEW-8 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SITE IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE FOR NEW CLASSROOMS TBD TBD 1 New $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ 130,000 TOTAL $ 5,647,785 $ 195,000 $ 197,340 $ 6,836,710 $ 12,876,835 $ -$ 12,876,835 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ 1,129,557 $ 39,000 $ 39,468 $ 1,367,342 $ 2,575,367 $ -$ 2,575,367 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ 6,777,342 $ 234,000 $ 236,808 $ 8,204,052 $ 15,452,202 $ -$ 15,452,202 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 52Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 53Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Rancho Mirage High School 31001 Rattler Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270-2702 33 67173 0127316 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1- 4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 1 B-100 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 100 Permanent ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 100 2013 A# 108388 1 10865 1 B-200 200 LIBRARY/MEDIA BUILDING Permanent 200 LIBRARY/MEDIA BUILDING 2013 A# 108388 1 11014 1 B-300 300 CLASSROOM BUILDING Permanent 300 CLASSROOM BUILDING 2013 A# 108388 2 66619 1 B-400 400 PERFORMING ARTS Permanent 400 PERFORMING ARTS 2013 A# 108388 2 43899 1 B-500 500 GYMNASIUM BUILDING Permanent 500 GYMNASIUM BUILDING 2013 A# 108388 1 43899 1 B-600 600 CLASSROOM BUILDINGS Permanent 600 CLASSROOM BUILDINGS 2013 A# 108388 2 83153 1 B-700 700 BUILDINGS CAFETERIA Permanent 700 BUILDINGS CAFETERIA 2013 A# 108388 2 23071 1 B-D 800 BUILDING Permanent 800 BUILDING 2013 A# 108388 1 7039 1 B-C CONCESSIONS Permanent CONCESSIONS 2013 A# 108388 1 3108 1 B-GSH GRANDSTANDS -HOME Permanent GRANDSTANDS -HOME 2013 A# 108388 1 B-GSV GRANDSTANDS -VISITOR Permanent GRANDSTANDS -VISITOR 2013 A# 108388 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New $ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE PE/ FIELD LIGHTING TBD TBD New 0 NEW-6 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE EXPLORATORY SPACE @ INTERIOR TBD TBD New 0 NEW-7 SITE IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT SMART BOARDS WITH MONITORS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-8 SITE IMPROVEMENT EQUIPMENT CHARGING STATIONS TBD TBD New 0 NEW -9 SITE IMPROVEMENT PERMANENT LIBRARY CONVERSION/ TO PARENT CENTER TBD TBD New 0 NEW -10 CONVERSION PERMANENT MODERNIZATION @ OFFICE SPACES/ PROTOTYPE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-11 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT COLLBORATION SPACES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-12 NEW CONSTRUCTION POOL NEW POOL TBD TBD New 0 NEW-13 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT PE/ LOCKER ROOM/ SHOWER BUILDING TO SERVE POOL @ 4000 SF TBD TBD New 0 NEW-14 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT SNACK BAR TBD TBD New TOTAL $ -$ -$ -$ 13,000 $ 13,000 $ -$ 13,000 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ -$ -$ 2,600 $ 2,600 $ -$ 2,600 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ -$ -$ 15,600 $ 15,600 $ -$ 15,600 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 54Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 55Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities James Workman Middle School 69-300 30th Ave., Cathedral City, CA 92234-4921 33 67173 6112692 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1- 4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1- 4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan.Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 3 B-1 ADMINISTRATION Permanent ADMINISTRATION -BUILDING 100 1995 A# 54222 1 5133 Medium Mod.$ 1,000,935 $ 1,000,935 $ 1,000,935 3 B-2,3,4,5 MAIN BUILDING Permanent CLASSROOMS 200'S, 400'S, 500'S / LIBRARY 1995 A# 54222 1 54952 Medium Mod.$ 10,715,640 $ 10,715,640 $ 10,715,640 3 B-6 MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE -BUILDING 600 1995 A# 54222 1 15446 Medium Mod.$ 3,011,970 $ 3,011,970 $ 3,011,970 3 B-9 RESTROOMS Permanent RESTROOMS -700 BUILDING 1995 A# 54222 1 753 Medium Mod.$ 146,835 $ 146,835 $ 146,835 3 B-8 LOCKERS Permanent LOCKER ROOMS -800 BUILDING 1995 A# 54222 1 6503 Medium Mod.$ 1,268,085 $ 1,268,085 $ 1,268,085 2 B-7 RESTROOMS Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING SOUTH 2000 A# 102346 1 534 Light Mod.$ 52,065 $ 52,065 $ 52,065 2 P-1 RELO-1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 901 2000 A# 102346 1 960 2 P-2 RELO-2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 902 2000 A# 102346 1 960 2 P-3 RELO-3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 903 2000 A# 102346 1 960 2 P-4 RELO-4 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 904 2000 A# 102346 1 960 2 P-5 RELO-5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 905 2001 A# 104773 1 960 2 P-6 RELO-6 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 906 2001 A# 104773 1 960 2 P-7 RELO-7 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 907 2001 A# 104773 1 960 2 P-8 RELO-8 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 908 2001 A# 104773 1 960 2 P-9 RELO-9 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 909 2001 A# 104773 1 960 2 P-10 RELO-10 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 910 2001 A# 104773 1 960 1 P-11 RELO-11 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 911 2010 A# 110964 1 960 2 M-1 RESTROOMS Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS NORTHEAST 2004 A# 102021 1 144 2 M-2 RESTROOMS Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS SOUTHEAST 2004 A# 102021 1 144 4 P-12 RELO-12 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 912 1988 A# 47710 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-13 RELO-13 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 913 1988 A# 47710 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 2 P-14 RELO-14 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 914 2004 A# 110964 1 960 1 P-15 RELO-15 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 915 2010 A# 110964 1 960 1 P-16 RELO-16 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 916 2010 A# 110964 1 960 1 P-17 RELO-17 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 917 2010 A# 110964 1 960 1 P-18 RELO-18 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 918 2010 A# 104773 1 960 1 P-19 RELO-19 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 919 2010 A# 104773 1 960 1 P-20 RELO-20 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 920 2010 A# 104773 1 960 3 SS-1 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1995 A# 54222 1 1792 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 NEW CONSTRUCTION PORTABLE NEW (2)CLASSROOM BUILDING/ REPLACE OLD PORTABLES TBD TBD 2 New $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 0 NEW -6 DEMO./REMOVAL PERMANENT / Or PORTABLE PORTABLE DEMO./REMOVAL/ UTILITIES TBD TBD New $ 10,400 $ 10,400 $ 10,400 0 NEW -7 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SITE IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE FOR NEW CLASSROOMS TBD TBD New $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 TOTAL $ -$ -$ 16,143,465 $ 797,433 $ 16,940,898 $ -$ 16,940,898 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ -$ 3,228,693 $ 159,487 $ 3,388,180 $ -$ 3,388,180 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ -$ 19,372,158 $ 956,920 $ 20,329,078 $ -$ 20,329,078 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 56Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 57Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Della S. Lindley Elementary School 31-495 Robert Rd., Thousand Palms, CA 92276-3343 33 67173 6106207 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 4 B-A ADMIN. / CLASSROOMS / MP Permanent ADMIN. / CLASSROOMS 2-4, 10-13 / MP 1987 A# 46691 1 48687 Medium Mod. $ 9,493,965 $ 9,493,965 $ 9,493,965 4 B-B CLASSROOMS Permanent CLASSROOMS 5-9 1987 A# 46691 Medium Mod. 4 B-C SPECIAL PROGRAMS Permanent HEADSTART 1987 A# 46691 Medium Mod. 4 B-D CLASSROOMS Permanent CLASSROOMS 17-27 1987 A# 46691 Medium Mod. 2 M-1 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 32-35 2005 A# 104797 2 3840 Light Mod. $ 374,400 $ 374,400 $ 374,400 2 M-2 RELO Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 40-47 2005 A# 102349 2 7680 Light Mod. $ 748,800 $ 748,800 $ 748,800 2 M-3 RESTROOM Modular MODULAR RESTROOM 2005 A# 104780 1 136 Light Mod. $ 13,260 $ 13,260 $ 13,260 2 P-1 HEAD START Portable HEADSTART PORTABLE 2000 A# 51200 1 2240 2 SS-3 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER (1 of 4)2008 A# 108433 1 1403 2 SS-4 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER (2 of 4)2008 A# 108433 1 1403 2 SS-5 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER (3 of 4)2008 A# 108433 1 1403 2 SS-6 SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER (4 of 4)2008 A# 108433 1 1403 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD 62583 New $ 569,505 $ 569,505 $ 569,505 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ 569,505 $ 9,688,965 $ -$ 1,136,460 $ 11,394,930 $ -$ 11,394,930 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ 113,901 $ 1,937,793 $ -$ 227,292 $ 2,278,986 $ -$ 2,278,986 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ 683,406 $ 11,626,758 $ -$ 1,363,752 $ 13,673,916 $ -$ 13,673,916 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 58Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 59Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Landau Elementary School 30310 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234-5200 33 67173 6107601 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 1 B-1 BLDG '1' – ADMINISTRATION Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1991 A# 49349 1 5712 Medium Mod. $ 1,113,840 $ 1,113,840 $ 1,113,840 4 B-2 BLDG '2' -MULTI- PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1989 A# 49349 1 6410 Medium Mod. $ 1,249,950 $ 1,249,950 $ 1,249,950 1 M-3A BLDG '3A' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 12-17 / RR'S 1989 A# 49349 1 5460 Medium Mod. $ 709,800 $ 709,800 $ 709,800 1 M-3B BLDG '3B' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 11-20 / RR'S 1989 A# 49349 1 6150 Medium Mod. $ 799,500 $ 799,500 $ 799,500 1 M-4 BLDG '4' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 1-5 / RR'S 1989 A# 49349 1 6150 Medium Mod. $ 799,500 $ 799,500 $ 799,500 1 M-5 BLDG '5' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS K1-K2 / RR'S 1989 A# 52104 1 6150 Medium Mod. $ 799,500 $ 799,500 $ 799,500 1 M-6 BLDG '6' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 21-26 1989 A# 49349 1 2592 Medium Mod. $ 336,960 $ 336,960 $ 336,960 4 P-1 RELO '1'Portable PRESCHOOL K3 1988 A# 114027 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-2 RELO '2' PRESCHOOL Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 27 1988 A# 50101 1 1440 Demo. $ 14,976 $ 14,976 $ 14,976 4 P-3 RELO '3'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 28 1988 A# 50585 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-4 RELO '4'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 29 1988 A# 50418 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-5 RELO '5'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 30 1988 A# 51282 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-6 RELO '6'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 34 1989 A# 28717 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-7 RELO '7'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 33 1989 A# 28712 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-8 RELO '8'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 32 1988 A# 28713 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-9 RELO '9'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 31 1989 A# 28714 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-10 RELO '10'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 36 1989 A# 50418 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 3 P-11 RELO '11'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 37 1997 A# 68435 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-12 RELO '12'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 38 1988 A# 66565 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 3 P-13 RELO '13'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM K4-K5 1997 A# 66565 1 960 1 P-14 RELO '14'Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 39 2016 A# 114771 1 960 1 P-15 RELO '15' Portable CLASSROOM 35 2016 A# 114771 1 960 1 P-16 RELO '16' KINDERGARTEN Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM K6 2016 A# 114771 1 1200 1 P-17 RELO '17'Portable PORTABLE RESTROOMS 2016 A# 114771 1 960 3 LS-1 SHADE STRUCTURE Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1992 A# 56984 1 1536 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD 55664 New $ 506,542 $ 506,542 $ 506,542 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD 300 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 0 NEW-6 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT NEW (12)CLASSROOM BUILDING/ REPLACE OLD PORTABLES TBD TBD 13000 New $ 8,450,000 $ 8,450,000 $ 8,450,000 0 NEW-7 DEMO./REMOVAL PERMANENT / Or PORTABLE PORTABLE DEMO./REMOVAL/ UTILITIES TBD TBD New $ 62,400 $ 62,400 $ 62,400 0 NEW-8 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SITE IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE FOR NEW CLASSROOMS TBD TBD New $ 260,000 $ 260,000 $ 260,000 TOTAL $ 506,542 $ 5,809,050 $ -$ 9,092,200 $ 15,407,792 $ -$ 15,407,792 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ 101,308 $ 1,161,810 $ -$ 1,818,440 $ 3,081,558 $ -$ 3,081,558 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ 607,851 $ 6,970,860 $ -$ 10,910,640 $ 18,489,351 $ -$ 18,489,351 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 60Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 61Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Rancho Mirage Elementary School 42-985 Indian Trail Rd., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270-4104 33 67173 6032445 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 3 B-100 ADMIN.Permanent ADMINISTRATION / KITCHEN 1967 A# 61258 1 5440 Extensive Mod.$ 1,768,000 $ 1,768,000 $ 1,768,000 3 B-700 MULTI-PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1995 A# 61258 1 5706 Medium Mod.$ 1,112,670 $ 1,112,670 $ 1,112,670 3 B-200 LIBRARY Permanent LIBRARY / COMPUTER LAB / LUNCH SHELTER 1967 A# 61258 1 3600 Extensive Mod.$ 1,170,000 $ 1,170,000 $ 1,170,000 3 B-300,400,500,600 CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 1-12 1967 A# 61258 1 15447 Extensive Mod.$ 5,020,275 $ 5,020,275 $ 5,020,275 3 B-900 CLASSROOM Permanent CLASSROOMS 13-15 1995 A# 61258 1 3925 Medium Mod.$ 765,375 $ 765,375 $ 765,375 3 B-800 KINDER Permanent CLASSROOMS K1-K2 1995 A# 61258 1 3540 Medium Mod.$ 690,300 $ 690,300 $ 690,300 2 M-1 RELO Modular CLASSROOMS 101-105, 201-205 2007 A# 109050 2 9760 Light Mod. $ 951,600 $ 951,600 $ 951,600 2 B-E ELEVATOR Permanent ELEVATOR BUILDING 2007 A# 109050 2 196 5 WW-1 WALKWAY Walkway COVERED WALKWAYS 1967 A# 61258 1 7300 Extensive Mod.$ 474,500 $ 474,500 $ 474,500 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD 300 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ 474,500 $ 10,526,620 $ 1,146,600 $ 12,147,720 $ -$12,147,720 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 94,900 $ 2,105,324 $ 229,320 $ 2,429,544 $ -$ 2,429,544 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 569,400 $ 12,631,944 $ 1,375,920 $ 14,577,264 $ -$14,577,264 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 62Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 63Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Sunny Sands Elementary School 69-310 McCallum Way, Cathedral City, CA 92234-2997 33 67173 6108450 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O)Total: Priority 1-4 & O Note:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 3 B-1 BLDG '1' ADMIN.Permanent ADMINISTRATION / LIBRARY 1990 A# 51119 1 5720 Medium Mod. $ 1,115,400 $ 1,115,400 $ 1,115,400 3 B-2 BLDG '2' MULTI- PURPOSE Permanent MULTI-PURPOSE 1990 A# 51119 1 7176 Medium Mod. $ 1,399,320 $ 1,399,320 $ 1,399,320 3 M-4 BLDG '4' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 1-6 1990 A# 51119 1 5460 Medium Mod. $ 709,800 $ 709,800 $ 709,800 3 M-3B BLDG '3B' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 7-9, 16-18 1990 A# 51119 1 6120 Medium Mod. $ 795,600 $ 795,600 $ 795,600 3 M-3A BLDG '3A' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 10-15 1990 A# 51119 1 6120 Medium Mod. $ 795,600 $ 795,600 $ 795,600 3 M-6B BLDG. '6B' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 19-21 1990 A# 54113 / A# 114852 1 3090 Medium Mod. $ 401,700 $ 401,700 $ 401,700 3 M-6A BLDG '6A' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS 22-24 1990 A# 54113 / A# 114852 1 3090 Medium Mod. $ 401,700 $ 401,700 $ 401,700 3 M-5 BLDG '5' CLASSROOM Modular MODULAR CLASSROOMS K1-K2 1990 A# 51119 1 2560 Medium Mod. $ 332,800 $ 332,800 $ 332,800 3 LS-1 LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1998 A# 105372 1 1584 Light Mod. $ 61,776 $ 61,776 $ 61,776 3 M-17 RELO-17 Modular HEADSTART MODULAR 1998 A# 105372 1 1920 Medium Mod. $ 249,600 $ 249,600 $ 249,600 3 P-K3 RELO-3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM K3 1990 A# 52080 / A# 105372 1 960 3 P-K4-K5 RELO-1-2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM K4-K5 1990 A# 66912 1 2400 3 P-9 RELO-9 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 25 1990 A# 53776 1 960 3 P-8 RELO-8 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 26 1990 A# 53776 1 960 3 P-7 RELO-7 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 27 1990 A# 53776 1 960 3 P-6 RELO-6 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 28 1990 A# 53776 1 960 3 P-5 RELO-5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 29 1990 A# 53776 1 960 3 P-4 RELO-4 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 30 1990 A# 53776 / A# 53739 1 960 3 P-10 RELO-10 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 31 1990 A# 66566 / A# 53528 1 960 4 P-11 RELO-11 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 33 1988 A# 56989 / A# 56984 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-12 RELO-12 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 34 1988 A# 56989 / A# 56985 1 960 Demo. $ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 3 P-13 RELO-13 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 35 1990 A# 56989 / A# 56986 1 960 1 P-14 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 32 2016 A# 114852 / A# 114027 1 960 3 P-15 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 36 1990 A# 53739 / A# 101524 1 960 3 P-16 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 37 1990 A# 53739 / A# 101524 1 960 3 P-17 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 38 1990 A# 53739 / A# 101524 1 960 1 P-18 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM K-6 2016 A# 114852 / A# 114027 1200 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD 59256 New $ 539,230 $ 539,230 $ 539,230 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD 300 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 0 NEW-6 NEW CONSTRUCTION PORTABLE NEW (2) CLASSROOM BUILDING/ REPLACE OLD PORTABLES TBD TBD 2 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ 650,000 0 NEW-7 DEMO./REMOVAL PERMANENT / Or PORTABLE PORTABLE DEMO./REMOVAL/ UTILITIES TBD TBD 2 $ 10,400 $ 10,400 $ 10,400 0 NEW-8 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SITE IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE FOR NEW CLASSROOMS TBD TBD 1 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 TOTAL $ 539,230 $ -$ 6,263,296 $ 940,368 $ 7,742,894 $ -$ 7,742,894 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ 107,846 $ -$ 1,252,659 $ 188,074 $ 1,548,579 $ -$ 1,548,579 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ 647,076 $ -$ 7,515,955 $ 1,128,442 $ 9,291,472 $ -$ 9,291,472 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 64Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 65Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Desert Learning Academy 2248 Ramon Rd, Palm Springs, CA 92264 33 67173 3330925 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P- O) 2 B-200 CLASSROOMS 202-207 Permanent CLASSROOMS 202-207 1940 A#4366 1 5300 Extensive Mod. $ 1,722,500 $ 1,722,500 $ 1,722,500 2 B-300 CLASSROOMS 302-306 Permanent CLASSROOMS 302-306 1940 / 2000 (Mod)A# 102161 1 5207 Light Mod. $ -$ 507,683 $ 507,683 2 B-400 CLASSROOMS 401-406 Permanent CLASSROOMS 401-406 1968 A#14469 1 5330 Extensive Mod. $ 1,732,250 $ 1,732,250 $ 1,732,250 2 B-500 CLASSROOMS 500 / MULTIPURPOSE Permanent CLASSROOMS 500 / MULTIPURPOSE 1980 / 2000 (Mod)A# 102161 1 13575 Light Mod. $ -$ 2,647,125 $ 2,647,125 2 B-700 CAFETERIA / CLASSROOMS 703-704 Permanent CAFETERIA / CLASSROOMS 703-704 1940 / 2000 (Mod)A# 102161 1 5500 Light Mod. $ -$ 536,250 $ 536,250 $ -$ - 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New $ -$ -$ - 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New $ -$ -$ - 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New $ -$ -$ - 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New $ -$ -$ - TOTAL $ -$ -$ -$ 3,454,750 $ 3,454,750 $ 3,691,058 $ 7,145,808 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ -$ -$ 690,950 $ 690,950 $ 738,212 $ 1,429,162 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ -$ -$ 4,145,700 $ 4,145,700 $ 4,429,269 $ 8,574,969 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 66Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 67Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Edward L. Wenzlaff Education Center 11625 West Dr, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+ Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1-4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization/ New. Con./ Demo.P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 1 B-A ADMINISTRATION / MULTI- PURPOSE Permanent ADMINISTRATION / MULTI-PURPOSE 1975 A# 37222 1 8660 1 B-D CLASSROOMS 2-9 / LIBRARY Permanent CLASSROOMS 312-319 / LIBRARY 1975 A# 39378 1 11700 1 B-C CLASSROOMS 16-24 Permanent CLASSROOMS 200-208 1975 A#37222 1 10400 1 B-B KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOM K1 Permanent KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOM K1 1975 A#41517 1 1650 1 M-F RELO-K2 Modular MODULAR KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOM K2 1975 A#41517 1 1320 1 B-T RESTROOM BUILDING Permanent RESTROOM BUILDING 1975 A#37222 1 480 1 P-1 RELO-1 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 41 2002 A# 105090 1 960 1 P-2 RELO-2 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 40 2002 A# 105090 1 960 1 P-3 RELO-3 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 39 2001 A# 105090 1 960 4 P-4 RELO-4 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 30 1988 A#50418 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-5 RELO-5 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 31 1988 A#50418 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 3 P-6 RELO-6 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 26 1988 A#50418 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-7 RELO-7 Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 25 1988 A#50418 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 1 LS-S LUNCH SHELTER Shelter LUNCH SHELTER 1975 1 1536 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 RESTROOM ADDITION PERMANENT NEW SITE RESTROOM ADDITION, (300 SF) TBD TBD 1 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 0 NEW-6 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT NEW (8) CLASSROOM BUILDING/ REPLACE OLD PORTABLES TBD TBD 9000 $ 5,850,000 $ 5,850,000 $ 5,850,000 0 NEW-7 DEMO./REMOVAL PERMANENT / Or PORTABLE PORTABLE DEMO./REMOVAL/ UTILITIESS TBD TBD 8 $ 41,600 $ 41,600 $ 41,600 0 NEW-8 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SITE IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE FOR NEW CLASSROOMS TBD TBD 1 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ 195,000 $ 6,126,536 $ -$ 6,321,536 $ -$ 6,321,536 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ 39,000 $ 1,225,307 $ -$ 1,264,307 $ -$ 1,264,307 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ 234,000 $ 7,351,843 $ -$ 7,585,843 $ -$ 7,585,843 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 68Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 FS 69Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 Palm Springs Unified School District Long-Range Facilities Master Plan -Financial Summary School:Address:CDS Code:PSUSD Priorities Mt. San Jacinto Continuation High School 30800 Landau Blvd., Cathedral City, CA 92234-5159 33 67173 3331121 Project Scope Priority 1 (1-2 yrs.) 2019 to 2020 Priority 2 (3 yrs.) 2021 to 2023 Priority 3 (4 yrs.) 2024 to 2028 Priority 4 (5+yrs.) 2029+Total: Priority 1-4 Total: Priority (O) Total: Priority 1- 4 & ONote:Refer to PBK Master Planning documents (2019) for Building ID and Site Improvement areas. Building and Site ID's have referenced "1A" Documents provided to Palm Springs Unified School District by Ruhnau Ruhnau Clarke Architects & Planners between 2012 -2013 when applicable for existing assets. A new ID has been added for new assets recently installed. Newer assets may not appear on this list as they are considered to be in good condition and may not require modernization as part of this 10 years Master Plan. Additional buildings and site structures that are considered for modernization due to life-cycle or other needs may be added to this list. Buildings Scope PSUSD Priorities Facilities Condition Index Building ID School/ Campus Building #Building-Type Building Description Year Built / Installed DSA Number Stories Gross Square Footage Modernization / New. Con./ Demo. P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P1-P4 P-O P1-P4 (& P-O) 4 B-1 MAIN BUILDING Permanent MAIN BUILDING 1989 A# 51545 1 25384 Medium Mod. $ 4,949,880 $ 4,949,880 $ 4,949,880 3 M-2 RELO-DAYCARE Modular ESPERANZA DAYCARE MODULAR 1993 A# 59003 1 1920 Medium Mod. $ 374,400 $ 374,400 $ 374,400 3 P-1 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM NEXT TO DAYCARE 1993 1 960 3 P-2 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 16 1990 A# 53739 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 3 P-3 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 17 1990 A# 53739 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 2 P-4 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 22 2005 A# 69217 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 2 P-5 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 23 2005 A# 69217 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-6 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 20 1989 A# 52491 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 4 P-7 RELO Portable PORTABLE CLASSROOM 21 1989 A# 52491 1 960 Demo.$ 9,984 $ 9,984 $ 9,984 2 M-2 RESTROOM Modular MODULAR RESTROOMS 2005 A# 69217 1 144 Medium Mod. $ 28,080 $ 28,080 $ 28,080 0 NEW-1 SAFETY & SECURITY VARIOUS SYSTEMS SITE SAFETY & SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS TBD TBD New 0 NEW-2 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM FIRE ALARM REPLACE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM/ SITES TBD TBD New 0 NEW-3 ASPHALT/ CONCRETE SITE SITE ASPHALT REPLACEMENT TBD TBD New 0 NEW-4 ROOFING ROOFING ROOFING REPAIR/ REPLACE TBD TBD New 0 NEW-5 NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT NEW (6) CLASSROOM BUILDING/ REPLACE OLD PORTABLES TBD 7000 New $ 4,550,000 $ 4,550,000 $ 4,550,000 0 NEW-6 DEMO./REMOVAL PERMANENT / Or PORTABLE PORTABLE DEMO./REMOVAL/ UTILITIESS TBD 6 New $ 31,200 $ 31,200 $ 31,200 0 NEW-7 SITE IMPROVEMENT SITE SITE IMPROVEMENT ALLOWANCE FOR NEW CLASSROOMS TBD 1 New $ 195,000 $ 195,000 $ 195,000 TOTAL $ -$ -$ 5,352,360 $ 4,836,104 $ 10,188,464 $ -$ 10,188,464 Path of Travel Allowance per Priority Phase/ Required Code Related Upgrades (Estimated 20% Allocation) $ -$ -$ 1,070,472 $ 967,221 $ 2,037,693 $ -$ 2,037,693 GRAND TOTAL -Modernizations/ Campus Improvements (includes 30% Soft Costs)$ -$ -$ 6,422,832 $ 5,803,325 $ 12,226,157 $ -$ 12,226,157 *All Cost Allowances /Estimates Reflect Forecasted 2019 Dollars // Construction Cost + Project Soft Costs// Costs are subject to change based on market conditions, and when projects are actually bid and executed by the District. **Soft Costs: A/E fees, misc. permitting/testing fees, contractor overhead/profit, project contingency, etc. Financials Current as of: June 25, 2019 Page intentionally left blank. FS 70Long-Range Facilities Master Plan 2019-2029 P�4LM �PI�IiVC� lJhlIFIE� ��H��L �I�TI�I�T ATTACHMENT 21 n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n ¬«62 ¬«111 ¬«111 ¬«74 §¨¦10 Future WenzlaffAlternative Center LandauES CahuillaES Rio VistaES Cabot YerxaES Sunny SandsES Cielo VistaES Rancho MirageES Della LindleyES Agua CalienteES Cathedral CityES Bubbling WellsES Julius CorsiniES Vista del MonteES Two BunchPalms ES Bella VistaES Katherin FinchyES Raymond CreeMS Painted HillsMS Nellie CoffmanMS Desert SpringsMS James WorkmanES Palm SpringsHS RanchoMirage HS CathedralCity HS Desert HotSprings HS DILL O N VA R N E RPALM RAMONINDIAN CANYONPIERSON SUNRISEWASHINGTONPORTOLACOUNTRY CLUBFARRELL COOKGERALD FORD MONTEREYHOVLEY FRED WARINGLANDAUVISTA CHINO 30TH BOB HOPEMILESWESTGENE AUTRYEL PASEOMOUNTAIN VIEWEISENHOWERHAYSTACKDA VALLLA VERNE TOLEDOCROSSLEYLONG CANYONELDORADOOASIS CLUBTA M A R I S K R O WLOS ALAMOSAVENIDA BERMUDAS42ND FRANK SINATRA MORNINGSIDEDEEP CANYONMESA VIEW CAMINO CAMPANERO DESERT VIEW GATEWA Y RAMP FRED WARINGBOB HOPEHOVLEYBOB HOPEEISENHOWERPALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTCURRENT ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES µ0 1 2 3 40.5 MilesNovember 2017 n High Schools n Middle Schools n Future Wenzlaff Alternative Center n Elementary Schools High School Boundaries High School Boundaries Middle School Boundaries Middle School Boundaries Elementary School Boundaries Agua Caliente ES Bella Vista ES Bubbling Wells ES Cabot Yerxa ES Cahuilla ES Cathedral City ES Della Lindley ES Julius Corsini ES Katherin Finchy ES Landau ES Rancho Mirage ES Rio Vista ES Sunny Sands ES Two Bunch Palms ES Vista del Monte ES ATTACHMENT 22 Palm Springs Unified School District Facilities Study Session O.E. 12 Presented by PSUSD Staff: Julie Arthur, Executive Director Facilities Planning & Development June 12, 2018 1 AGENDA 1.Review November 14, 2017 Facilities Study Session 2.Measure E Bond and Redevelopment Projects and Funds 3.Introduce Career Technical Project at Desert Hot Springs High School -PBK Architects 4.Solar Production and General Fund Savings Update 5.Surplus Property Discussion 6.Potential New Actions and Projects 2 1. Review November 14, 2017 Facilities Study Session 1.Approved Seismic Building Renovations at Palm Springs High School –Budget $43 M of Bond Funds. 2.Approved installation of Metal Shade Canopies at Elementary School -$3.3 M of Bond Funds. 3.Investigate cost of auxiliary gym at Palm Springs High School –Estimated budget. 4.Approved Edward Wenzlaff Education Center New Early Childhood Classroom -$500,000 of Redevelopment Funds. 5.Approved investigation of potential solar, solar battery storage options, and other renewable energy resources - $150,000 of Redevelopment Funds. 3 1. Review November 14, 2017 Facilities Study Session 6.Approved increase of High School Marquees’ Budget – $450,000 –Redevelopment Funds. 7.Approved forgiving the PSUSD Foundation’s loan amount of $84,638. 4 2.Measure E Bond & Redevelopment Projects and Funds 2. Measure E Bond Authorization Measure E $516,000,000 Series Authorized Amount Total Bonds Issued Remaining Authorization November 2010 A $24,690,000 $24,690,000 November 2010 B 110,000,000 134,690,000 November 2013 C 70,000,000 204,690,000 July 2016 D $100,000,000 $304,690,000 $211,310,000* 5*Will be known as Measure I when next tranche sold 2. Measure E Bond Current Projects Name of Project Status 1. District-wide phone system and bandwidth Completed 2. Cathedral City High School Theater upgrades Completed 3. District-wide swimming pool at CCHS Completed 4. Solar & roofing at CCHS for pool Construction 5. Agua Caliente Elementary renovation Construction 6. 1st Phase District-wide fire and security alarm upgrades Completed 7. Raymond Cree MS 8 classroom permanent Completed 8.District-wide heating and air conditioning replacements Prop. 39 funding match –PSHS, JWMS, MSJ 99% Complete 9. Raymond Cree Middle roof replacement Completed 10. James Workman Middle roof replacement Completed 11. Rancho Mirage Elementary roof replacement Completed 6 2. Measure E Bond Current Projects Name of Project Status 12. Updated Facilities Master Plan On-going 13. AB 300 List Seismic Building Renovation –PSHS Buildings Design 14. Review of Shade Structure types and costs Completed 15. Surplus Property sales On-going 16. Palm Springs High Field Restroom Building Construction 17. Proposition 39 Lighting retro-fit Construction 18. Parking Lot Improvements –RVES, CCES, TBPES & KFES Design & Construction 19.Review of 8 schools parking and traffic issues Completed 20.Tenant Improvement Service Center Completed 21. Nellie Coffman Middle Chiller Replacement In DSA 7 2. Measure E Bond Current Projects Name of Project Status 22. Metal Shade Canopies In DSA 23. Landau Staff Parking Lot Completed 24. Purchase of new elementary site in Desert Hot Springs Reviewing 8 2. Measure E Bond Fund Balance 9 Project Expenditures Thru 6/30/17 FY 18 Budget FY19 Budget FY20 Budget Project Budget State Funds Total cost to Bond Measure Savings or (Increase) on Approved Budget Aqua Caliente ES Re-build $ 5,807,719 $ 23,184,800 $ 17,184,495 $ 46,177,014 $ 46,177,014 DW Prop 39 HVAC Projects 211,133 1,753,983 921,884 2,887,000 2,887,000 LAN Staff Parking Lot + Traffic Study 47,352 467,978 650,000 650,000 134,670 Traffic Study 275,000 275,000 275,000 Parking Lot Redesign-CCES, KFES, RVES & TPB ES Schools 875,512 124,488 1,000,000 1,000,000 NNC Chiller 23,590 874,339 4,852,071 5,750,000 5,750,000 PROP 39 Matching HVAC / Lighting 1,900,0000 1,900,000 1,900,000 Palm Springs HS Restroom Building 53,306 721,694 775,000 775,000 PSUSD Pool Roof/Solar panels 142,687 377,037 480,277 1,000,000 1,000,000 JWMS Roofing 729,131 393,687 1,956,000 1,956,000 833,182 RMES Roofing 607,289 781,107 585,000 1,335,584 (803,396) RCMS Roofing 865,724 1,275,690 2,500,000 2,176,232 358,586 Retro-Commissioning CCHS, NNC, RMHS, DSC and RCMS 275,000 275,000 275,000 Facilities Master Plan Update 24,900 274,000 151,000 450,000 450,000 2. Measure E Bond Fund Balance 10 Project Expenditures Thru 6/30/17 FY 18 Budget FY19 Budget FY20 Budget Project Budget State Funds Total Cost to Bond Measure Savings/ (Increase)on Approved Budget Surplus Property & 711 Committee 100,000 100,000 100,000 DW Drinking Fountains 1,024,238 975,762 2,000,000 2,000,000 M & O Deferred Maintenance Bond Projects 4,949,707 850,293 5,800,000 5,800,000 AB 300 Seismic 250,000 250,000 250,000 Edward Wenzlaff Repurpose F & E 453,834 453,834 453,834 DHS Elementary New Land Purchase 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Palm Springs High Seismic Renovation 1,486,890 2,319,500 39,193,610 43,000,000 43,000,000 Metal Shade Canopies – Elementary Schools 212,000 3,088,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 Bond Costs 198,997 100,000 100,000 398,997 398,997 Est. Total Project Cost Approved $8,711,828 $ 38,752,762 $ 35,821,327 $ 39,193,610 $ 123,482,845 $ 122,959,803 $ 523,041 2. Measure E Bond Fund Balance 11 Project Expenditures Thru 6/30/17 FY 18 Budget FY19 Budget FY20 Budget Project Budget Total Cost to Bond Measure Savings/ (Increase)on Approved Budget Est. Total Project Cost Approved $8,711,828 $ 38,752,762 $ 35,821,327 $ 39,193,610 $ 123,482,845 $ 122,959,803 $ 523,041 Interest Revenues 1,077,891 1,000,000 760,000 500,000 Bond Issuance July 2016 100,000,000 Estimated Total Revenues 101,077,891 1,000,000 760,000 500,000 Funding Source: Bond Funds Measure E Series B and C FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 CASH BALANCE Estimated balance 6/30/17 134,963,225 Estimated balance 6/30/18 (37,752,762)$ 97,210,463 Estimated balance 6/30/19 (35,061,327)$ 62,149,136 Estimated balance 6/30/20 (38,693,610)$23,455,526 2. Redevelopment Fund Projects Name of Project Status 1 Ongoing Minor Capital Projects On-going 2. LED Marquees –High Schools Construction 3. District Administration Center Completed 2018 4. Desert Hot Springs Landscape Conservation Project Completed 2017 5. Katherine Finchy Elementary solar panel enhancement Completed 2016 6. VDM Elementary Communication Tower Relocation Completed 2016 7. Elementary School Traffic Study Completed 2016 8. Phase II Energy Conservation at 10 schools Completed 2016 9. Rancho Mirage High School Video Scoreboard Completed 2016 10. Energy Conservation –HVAC ground unit replacement Completed 2016 11. Farrell Site desert landscape conservation Completed 2015 12 2. Redevelopment Fund Balance 13 Projects Expenses thru 6/30/17 FY18 Budget FY19 Budget Project Budgets Savings/ (Increase)on Approved Budget New District Administration Center $ 12,521,673 $ 19,728,327 $ 250,000 $ 32,500,000 VDM Cell Tower 365,030 3,537 -485,000 116,433 KF Solar Panel Enhancement 149,269 160,000 10,731 DW Parking-lot Review 66,525 90,000 23,475 LED Marquees for High Schools 34,329 665,671 700,000 DHS Landscape match for MSWD - 228,286 34,732 -285,000 21,982 Climatec –Performance Contract 17,000 8,500 25,500 Early Childhood at Edward Wenzlaff Education 500,000 500,000 Solar Battery/Alt. Energy Resources 150,000 150,000 Total Expenses $ 13,365,230 $ 21,099,973 $ 258,500 $ 34,722,997 $ 172,622 2. Redevelopment Fund Balance 14 Projects Expenses thru 6/30/17 FY18 Budget FY19 Budget Project Budgets Savings/ (Increase)on Approved Budget Total Expenses $ 13,365,230 $ 21,099,973 $ 258,500 $ 34,722,997 $ 172,622 Annual Expenses FY18 Budget FY19 Transfer to 06 for Technology $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Transfer to MMR 3,551,700 3,551,700 Airlinks towers 139,500 139,500 TIS PO's + Edom Hill 50,562 63,000 Olinger Lease 67,475 67,475 Suitt Lease 118,416 118,416 MCP Funds 236,053 200,000 General Fund Cash Flow Reserve 10,000,000 Total Cost of Projects and Annual Expenses 13,365,230 37,262,973 6,398,591 Total Revenues 9,362,179 9,641,792 9,400,000 Foundation Loan Forgiveness (84,638) Net Change (4,003,051)(27,705,820)3,001,409 FY 18 FY 19 Cash Flow 6/30/17 35,831,725 Balance as of 6/30/18 8,125,905 Balance as of 6/30/19 11,127,314 15 3. CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION FACILITIES – DESERT HOT SPRINGS CLASSROOM 1320 SF WORKSHOP 1388 SF TRAINING BAY WORKSHOP 1558 SF 1560 SF STORAGE STORAGE 1295 SF 1295 SF 100 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CTE BUILDING N 3. Career Technical Education Facility –DHS HS 01 6 8 32 64 FT TRAININGBAY 1558 SF STORAGE 1295 SF CLASSROOM 1320 SF WORKSHOP 1560 SF WORKSHOP 1388 SF STORAGE 1295 SF DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CTE BUILDING N 0 8 1 6 32 64 FT CLASSROOM 1320 SF WORKSHOP 1388 SF TRAINING BAY WORKSHOP 1558 SF 1560 SF STORAGE STORAGE 1295 SF 1295 SF 100 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CTE BUILDING N 0 8 1 6 32 64 FT CLASSROOM 1320 SF WORKSHOP 1388 SF TRAINING BAY WORKSHOP 1558 SF 1560 SF STORAGE STORAGE 1295 SF 1295 SF 100 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CTE BUILDING N 0 8 1 6 32 64 FT CLASSROOM 1320 SF WORKSHOP 1388 SF TRAINING BAY WORKSHOP 1558 SF 1560 SF STORAGE STORAGE 1295 SF 1295 SF 100 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CTE BUILDING N 0 8 1 6 32 64 FT CLASSROOM 1320 SF WORKSHOP 1388 SF TRAINING BAY WORKSHOP 1558 SF 1560 SF STORAGE STORAGE 1295 SF 1295 SF 100 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CTE BUILDING N 0 8 1 6 32 64 FT CLASSROOM 1320 SF WORKSHOP 1388 SF TRAINING BAY WORKSHOP 1558 SF 1560 SF STORAGE STORAGE 1295 SF 1295 SF 100 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CTE BUILDING N 0 8 1 6 32 64 FT CLASSROOM 1320 SF WORKSHOP 1388 SF TRAINING BAY WORKSHOP 1558 SF 1560 SF STORAGE STORAGE 1295 SF 1295 SF 100 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CTE BUILDING N 0 8 1 6 32 64 FT CLASSROOM 1320 SF WORKSHOP 1388 SF TRAINING BAY WORKSHOP 1558 SF 1560 SF STORAGE STORAGE 1295 SF 1295 SF 100 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CTE BUILDING N 0 8 1 6 32 64 FT CLASSROOM 1320 SF WORKSHOP 1388 SF TRAINING BAY WORKSHOP 1558 SF 1560 SF STORAGE STORAGE 1295 SF 1295 SF 100 DESERT HOT SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CTE BUILDING N 0 8 1 6 32 64 FT 26 4. SOLAR PRODUCTION & GENERAL FUND SAVINGS UPDATE 4. Desert Springs Middle School Solar •District was awarded an additional $1,602,073 Grant from SCAQMD AB 1318 Mitigation Fees Fund for a total of $4,602,043 to be received in SCAQMD Grant Funding •Cost -$1,590,000 •System Size 406 kW/DC •793,000 kW annual production •SunPower 340 Panels •Status –Completed and online •Anticipate Savings per year -$87,100 •Dedication 4-25-18 27 3. Solar Production (SunEdison) •PPA Solar Sites (13) •Bella Vista ES (10/22/2014) •Cabot Yerxa ES (12/18/2014) •Cathedral City ES (12/10/2015) •Cathedral City HS (8/5/2013) •Desert Hot Springs HS (11/19/2013) •District Service Center (10/19/2013) •Katherine Finchy ES (12/7/2015) •James Workman ES (5/22/2013) •Nellie Coffman MS (10/15/2014) •Painted Hills MS (10/19/2013) •Palm Springs HS (8/26/2013) •Rancho Mirage HS (8/27/2013) •Raymond Cree MS (10/15/2014) Total 43,350,000 kWh generated (as of 5/1/2018) Estimated General Fund Savings of PPA Solar Sites $616,000 28 3. Solar Production –District Owned Bubbling Wells ES* Generation to Date (online 11/6/2014 to 5/1/2018) 1,713,477 kWh Desert Hot Springs HS* Generation to Date (online 1/6/2015 to 5/1/2018) 510,430 kWh Two Bunch Palms ES* Generation to Date (online 11/5/2014 to 5/1/2018) 1,744,817 kWh Total 3,970,742 kWh solar power generated *Estimated General Fund Savings of District Owned Solar $635,319 Estimated General Fund Savings of PPA Solar 616,000 TOTAL: $ 1,251,319 Rebates generated to date $378,149 (and counting) Grant Funding Provided by SCAQMD AB1318 Mitigation Fees Fund 29*Does not include DSMS Solar estimate 3. Solar Opportunities •Landau Elementary •Sunny Sands Elementary •District Administration Center 30 31 5. PSUSD SURPLUS PROPERTY DISCUSSION 32 5. PSUSD SURPLUS PROPERTY UPDATE DISTRICT DISTRICT NO. 67173 COUNTY F/Y Palm Springs Unified RIVERSIDE (33)17-18 Site Grade Level E-M- H No. Acres Year Acquired Purchase Price Parcel ID Number Assessed Value Assessed Fee Year Assessable KAREN STREET SCHOOL E 11.7 2007 2,650,000 667-100-006- 8 235,000 2,350 13/14 9831504 PALM DESERT SCHOOL SITE E 24.5 2006 13,497,000 653-260- 024,025 2,740,000 27,400 12/13 9830274 RAMON ROAD 80 ACRES H 80 2011 15,100,000 670-230-006- 4 15,100,000 151,000 18/19 9833823 SECTION 14 (PARTIAL) 9703254 E 7 1956 21,560 659,028 6,590 12/13 TOTAL PAID TO STATE ANNUALLY FOR SURPLUS PROPERTY:$ 187,340 33 6. Potential New Actions and Projects 34 6. RESOLUTION DELEGATING AUTHORITY REGULAR SESSION AGENDA ITEM: BEFORE THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 2018/2019-01 RESOLUTION DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF BUSINESS SERVICES TO AWARD EMERGENCY CONTRACTS WHEREAS, Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050(b)(1) the governing body, by a four -fifths vote, may delegate, by resolution or ordinance to the appropriate county administrative officer, city manager, chief engineer or other non -elected agency officer, the authority to order any action to repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate ac tion required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, service, and supplies, for those purposes; without giving notice for bids to let contracts……. Section 6.That this Resolution shall take effect as of the date of its adoption and shall remain in effect until rescinded by the Board. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Governing Board of the Palm Springs Unified School District this 12th day of June, 2018, by the following vote: • 35 6. Potential Actions Pending BOE Direction 1.Katherine Finchy Parking Lot Renovation -$1.25 M. 2.Two Bunch Palms Elementary Parking Lot Renovation -$1.4 M. 3.Cathedral City and Rio Vista Elementary Parking Lot Renovations -$3.5 M. 4.Maintenance & Operations Phase 2 Fire Alarm Replacement DLES, CCHS, LES, SSES –$2.1 M. 5. Maintenance & Operations Roofing projects –$5 M. 6.New furniture to replace outdated broken furniture at district schools $1.8 M. 7.Solar shade-canopy installation at Landau Elementary and District Administration Center -$4.25 M. 8.Solar Shade-canopy installation at Sunny Sands Elementary School –2.M 9.Additional solar, battery storage and micro-grids -$ 8.5 M. 10.DAC changes to offices, walls and furniture -$1 M. 11.District-wide Door Security & Safety Study -$ 500,000 2. Measure E Bond Fund Balance 36 Project Expenditures Thru 6/30/17 FY 18 Budget FY19 Budget FY20 Budget Project Budget Total Cost to Bond Measure Savings/Increase on Approved Budget Est. Total Project Cost Approved $8,711,828 $ 38,752,762 $ 35,821,327 $ 39,193,610 $ 123,482,845 $ 122,959,803 $ 523,041 Interest Revenues 1,077,891 1,000,000 760,000 500,000 Bond Issuance July 2016 100,000,000 Estimated Total Revenues 101,077,891 1,000,000 760,000 500,000 Funding Source: Bond Funds Measure E Series B and C FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 CASH BALANCE Estimated balance 6/30/17 134,963,225 Estimated balance 6/30/18 (37,752,762)$ 97,210,463 Estimated balance 6/30/19 (35,061,327)$ 62,149,136 Estimated balance 6/30/20 (38,693,610)$23,455,526 6. Potential Actions and Projects Pending BOE Direction –Bond Funds Project Amount Requested Available Bond Funds $23,455,526 Katherine Finchy Parking Elementary Lot Renovation* $1,250,000 22,205,526 Two Bunch Palms Elementary Parking Lot Renovation* 1,400,000 20,805,526 Cathedral City and Rio Vista Elementary Parking Lot Renovations* 3,500,000 17,305,526 Fire Alarm Replacement Phase 2 2,100,000 15,205,526 Maintenance & Operations Roofing Projects 5,000,000 $10,205,526 Total:$ 13,250,000 37 * Only Planning budget of $1,000,000 previously approved -Parking Lot Redesign-CCES, KFES, RVES & TPB ES Schools 2. Redevelopment Fund Balance 38 Projects Expenses thru 6/30/17 FY18 Budget FY19 Budget Project Budgets Savings/Increase Total Expenses $ 13,365,230 $ 21,099,973 $ 258,500 $ 34,722,997 $ 172,622 Annual Expenses FY18 Budget FY19 Transfer to 06 for Technology $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Transfer to MMR 3,551,700 3,551,700 Airlinks towers 139,500 139,500 TIS PO's + Edom Hill 50,562 63,000 Olinger Lease 67,475 67,475 Suitt Lease 118,416 118,416 MCP Funds 236,053 200,000 *General Fund Cash Flow Reserve 10,000,000 Total Cost of Projects and Annual Expenses 13,365,230 37,262,973 6,398,591 Total Revenues 9,362,179 9,641,792 9,400,000 Foundation Loan Forgiveness (84,638) Net Change (4,003,051)(27,705,820)3,001,409 FY 18 FY 19 Cash Flow 6/30/17 35,831,725 Balance as of 6/30/18 8,125,905 Balance as of 6/30/19 11,127,314 6. Potential Actions and Projects Pending BOE Direction –Redevelopment Funds Project Amount Requested Available Redevelopment Funds $ 8,125,905 Release of General Fund Cash Flow Reserve $10,000,000 18,125,905 New furniture to replace outdated broken furniture at district schools < 1,800,000>16,325,905 Solar shade-canopy installation at Landau Elementary and District Administration Center < 4,250,000>12,075,905 Solar Shade-canopy installation at Sunny Sands Elementary School < 2,000,000>10,075,905 Additional solar, battery storage and micro-grids < 8,500,000>1,575,905 District-wide Door & Security Safety Study <500,000>1,075,905 DAC changes to offices, walls and furniture < 1,000,000>75,905 Total Projects:$ 18,050,000 39 40 Thank You Questions or comments? ATTACHMENT 23 TERRIT4RY TRANSFER ANALYSIS PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TU DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT INCLUDING AN ANALYSIS OF EDUCATION CODE SECTIQN 35753 .. �. . � �. .� � • RIVERSIDE CUUNTY COMMITTEE ON SCHOOL DISTRICT ORGANI'LATION SUBNIITTED BY: Cald�cel! Flores �'inter8, Inc. Cardiff, California July 2002 ' � � ' t L I � � I I � TABLE OF C4NTENTS Background..................................................................................................................................... 1 Purposeof the Study ....................................................................................................................... 2 Description of the Proposed Petition Area ...................................................................................... 2 Rationale for Proposing Formation ................................................................................................. 3 Position ofthe Governing Boazds ................................................................................................... 3 Scopeof the Study .......................................................................................................................... 3 Dataand Methodology .................................................................................................................... 4 EC §35753(a)(1): The new disficts will be adequate in terms of number of pupils enrolled........ 5 GeneralFinding .......................................................................................................................... 5 Standardof Review ..................................................................................................................... 5 Analysisof Data .......................................................................................................................... 5 Findings/Conclusions .................................................................................................................. 5 EC §35753(a)(2): The districts are each organized on the basis of a substanrial community identiry. ........................................................................................................................................... 6 GeneralFinding ......................................................................................................................... 6 Standardof Review ..................,.................................................................................................. 6 Findings/Conclusions .................................................................................................................. 6 Isolation, Geography, Topography, and Weather ................................................................... 6 Community, School, and Social Ties and Other Circumstances Peculiar To The Area......... 6 EC §35753(a}(3}: The proposai wil] result in an equitable division of properiy and facilities of the original district or districts . ....................................................................................................... 8 GeneralFinding ......................................................................................................................... 8 Standardof Review ..................................................................................................................... 8 Findings/Conclusions .................................................................................................................. 8 i � r Divisionof Assets ......................................................................................... .......................... 9 � ADA and Assessed Valuation Calculations .................................................................................... 9 � Real Properry and Personal Property Normally Situated in Each District (Open and Operating SchoolSites} ................................................................................................................. ........... I 0 Funds and Other Obligations ........................................................................................................ I 1 � Division of Liabilities ............................... 13 .................................................................................... IDivision of Personal Property Other than Funds .......................................................................... l 6 Division of Bonded Indebtedness ................................................................................................. 17 � EC §35753(a)(4): The reorganization of the districts will not promote racial ar ethnic discrimination or segregation ........................................................................................................ 19 � General Finding .............................................................................. ........ ............... 19 .... ............... � Standard of Review .............................................................................................. ... 19 . . . .................. F�nd�ngs/Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 19 IEC §35753(a)(5): The proposed reorganization will not result in ariy substantial increase in costs tothe state . .................................................................................................................................... 21 � General Finding ........................................................................................................................ 21 Standardof Review ................................................................................................................... 2I ` Findings/Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 2l I EC §35753(a)(6): The proposed reorganization will not significantly disrupt the educarional � programs in the proposed districts and districts affected by the proposed reorganization and will continue to promote sound education performance in those districts ........................................... 22 EGeneral Finding ........................................................................................................................ 22 Standardof Review ................................................................................................................... 22 Findings..................................................................................................................................... 22 FC §35753(a)(7): The proposed reareanizatian wiil not result in a sienificant increase in school hous�ng costs ................................................................................................................................. 23 GeneralFinding ........................................................................................................................ 23 Findings/Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 23 ii � ' EC §35753(a)(8): Tf�e proposed reorganization is not primarily designed to result in a significant � increase in property values causing financial advantage to property owners because territory was transferred from one school district to an adjoining district . ........................................................ 25 ' General Finding ................................................................................. ................................... 25 Findings/Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 25 ' EC §35753(a){9): The proposed reorganization will not cause a substantial negative effect on the fiscal management or fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affccted by the proposed reorganization ........................................................... ........ 27 . ............................................. ' General Finding ........................... ....... 27 ...................................................................................... � Staff Findings/Conciusions ....................................................................................................... 27 Impactson Existing Funds .................................................................................................... 27 tEstimated Impacts on Future Funds ...................................................................................... 28 ' Conclusion and Summary ............................................................................................................. 31 � � � � � � Background On July 1, 1948 the Palm Springs Unified School District (USD) was formed with a service area � that included the western portion of the Coachella Valley. The population over the next eighteen years in the Coachella VaEley grew and pushed eastward. In 196b ihe Desert Sands U5D was formed. Continued development arid eastward migration of population centers helped spur the � formation of the Coachella Valley USD in 1973. These three school districts currently provide educational services to the kindergarten through 12'� grade (K-12) population across the entire valley. The Paim Springs USD lies in the westem portion of the Coachella Valley and covers portions of the cities of Desert �Iot Springs, and Palm Springs on the west and all of the cities of Cathedral City, and Tbousand Palms, and portions of Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage on the east.l�e Desert Sands USD lies in the central portion of the Coachella Valley and includes a portioa of the cities of Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage on the west, all of the cities of Bermuda Dunes and indian Wells, and portions of Coachella, Indio, and La Quinta on the east. Both districts contain unincocporated territory. As urban centers developed, school district boundaries have been adjusted to better serve the local population. Although many adjustments have been proposed, not all have succeeded. Hawever, there has been a history of proposals for territory transfers a}ong the central portion of the Desert Sands USD and Palm Springs USD boundary. ln 1981, a citizen petition proposing to transfer of territory from the Palm Springs USD to the Hemet USD was denied by the Riverside County Committee on School District Qrgani2ation (County Committee}. In 1991, Westinghouse Desert Communities, Inc., owner of the Bighom Development Project, petitioned to move its territory from the Palm Springs USD to the Desert Sands USD because the propased street network for their development and the topography of the area would force residents to travel through the Desert Sands USD to reach Palm Springs USD schools. The staff to the County Committee completed its work in January 1992 and the petition was approved in 1993 and became effective in l 994. In September 1993, both the Palm Springs USD and Desert Sands USD goveming boards approved a petition to transfer uninhabited territory in the vicinity of Washington and 38�' Street from the Palm Springs USD to the Desert Sands USD. 7'he Caunty Committee approved the petition in December 1993 and the transfer became effective in 1994. In 1994 the County Committee consolidated four actions and accepted tentadve plans and recommendations for the following proposed reorganizations: "Area 1, Cahuilla Hills, File No. 73", which proposed to transfer territory immediatcly north of the Bighorn area from the Palm Spnngs USD to the Desert Sands USD, "Area 2, Clancey Lane Area, File No. 74", which proposed to transfer territory in or adjaccnt to the City af Rancho Mirage nort� of Cahuilla Hills from the Desert Sands USD to the Palm Springs USD, consideration of Area 2 was dropped at the Jeu�e 1994 meeting, i I "Area 3, Monterey Avenue at Frank Sinatra Drive, File No. 75", which is in the City of Palm Desert East of Monterey Avenue, north of Frank Sinatra Drive and South of Interstate 10 that is the area thai is also the subject of this proposal, and "Area 4, 38�' Avenue at Washington, File No. 76", the same area approved for transfer in September 1993 to reverse the transfer and retum this area to the Palm Springs USD from the Desert Sands USD. At its August 1994 meeting the Co�uity Committee appraved the Area 1 transfer and took no actian on Areas 3 and 4. In 1998 a petition to transfer the area, which is in the Ciry of Palm Desert east of Monterey Avenue, north of Frank Sinatra Drive and south of Interstate 1� that is the area that is also tile subject of this proposal was deemed invalid by the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools. In December 2001, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert pursuant to Education Code Section (EC §) 35721(c) passed and transmitted a resolution to the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools to transfer the subject territory from the Palm Springs USD to the Desert Sands USD. In February 2002, the County Committee granted the petition of the City of Palm Desert pursvant to EC §35721(d) and scheduled two public hearings that were held in each affected district on April 15, 2002. This study was commissioned by the County Committee to regort on the facts surrounding EC §35753(a). Purpose of the Study 7�he hearings are part of the process used by the County Committee to study and evaluate proposals. The purpose of the hearings is to obtain information so that the County Comcr�ittee can determine the feasibility of a proposa). On behalf of the County Committee, this study is being conducted on the proposal. The study has involved interviews with the districts and the staff of the Ciry of Palm Desert and the gathering of data from state and local sources. The study is focused on the nine conditions that are defined by EC§ 35753. The informallon necessary to study the nine conditions for school district reorganization are set forth in EC§ 35753. The process involves examining data to determine if each of the nine conditions could be substantially mei. Enrollment, Average Daily Attendance, fiscal data, and Revenue Limits were available for the 2000-01 school year before the commencement of this study. The data contained herein are intended to be used as a guide for the County Committee to determine whether the nine conditions have been substantially met. Description of the Proposed Petition Area This study analyzes the feasibiliry of transferring the subject territory from the Palm Springs USD to the Desert Sands USD. A map showing the location and territary of the subject school dish-icts is included. 71ie petition area is contiguoas and self-contained. It is a triangular shaped area south of Interstate 10, east of Monterey Avenue, and north of Frank Sinatra Drive that is located on the 2 �"'� A•'}y� f�S .�. = ��� i�`"�' �.. � �1,.� �.�. �'��#r y , is� �� �� ��,i� �S+' � � ;I _ry- r v-♦,:; ""rr�. �!� ,�+ � �`' � �" ';�'y,T�}' _� ~�'f�� � �' ��� � , .��{� �`i � '��T`��F"}i..ti�"�'r �. ��f-r�• }�' _;-� ��J�� J�. f . -�. _ .' .S r ►* , ) .� i �1- ,�,i���� 7f-_ �. .��r� ! � .�y,�'.r '"fi•����'1!7,� r� T�'"T„J+}`�_,� �'�.`� .� ��'���� k "y��y - �:�.-' � .�� ,x _� •��rt' f'r�jar ��. '1' .r --�r t� Y �f. �. �[��� yF�-�. .�. } ��t :R�. ai.: �•���. � R.. P� ty� r' p � ''�� J i r�= � . Y fr� ��+�`�^ r � . � . � �,. . � � �� � ` . ��. a5.t_ j . � / �r�. t - - h �� .:�w "3 . _ - � h � .�., � . . r.}�.r ��- �:- J=J ,- ,�� .�,�`�.:� �Sr�{1" r � sr , < _-��-f` �.� ....r �- .. .r� '� [x{r�_1r'i' J'�.`� .r��� � '�'�f' - �'�,- y � `� -" jy� �i�i3af ,!r�a r r�.� �� ■ �[� � -�` . _ . i� �}� �.t � �t s�'� � - Y � � �� � ; � .+�7 ..'�a'"�`_ . �. � ":r x -� Y ��-.- � -. 3 � � . � � ��� � r� .'� � �!" � , • _ i'� '_.7� � �� �� �c ,� :�.�,��� _ J' ��US . _ � +- , i r. r� ra �; . ..: r� ';� • r~" � � 4�_L� � r � �_ . � '� Y r' ��� "�+� ` .-� 1 - . '� -� s. y :�� . - '.� �_� r � � S �_,_ �� F ��, , ' F � ! r i ��� _ �i` . . a,t, . � j�� �J .�� �� ` l t . � ti� jTi -X'Y 'J '� • ^.. .�'A'��V .��t� . i i� � -,-��.. � r r.,.�,� :-i� __.,.�. :' +�' � � _ - -. �'•`' ; ,• �-- ! , ,� ^�~-' }i� .�;_.�.�F' � i :►i -� ?�•* �. .a � . M1 '-T � � � r + {� �� • _�,_:. ` y � s �. .;. �;x �-.-� ' 1' d��' :'��-,��`(�- - � .. I ���'2F - j + . �. � - - . _ " _ • -.�fr'.� �►{j*�.. "> _`�' `ti. � • � ti t� .�.`�'i'�'- • r � � - � • �� � _ -~ �}y� %�.'v'`�'7�' r f - "'� ,. ��,� � I . �''.f�� ���-�-alr j J .� ' ^� .. of, '��v �� 'Y.:�.;Jf�� r T ,t-•{� aii�f �-�'�. f7 ��i ��_ ��x_ , �:���:�.. ��, , �, ,�. ; R - ;' r -r; r s � � r _ ' � { .Y ..'. '. � � r .�J �'�.;,~ �.! • ��'�y l.__ � - � �-. I� � - -�� � •�^" r � � # 'Y �' � � _ ' { :a.t��'f' �' 'r. � �.::�� ' T; �}��" .y'r � '� _ _ �� �'1 �.' �� � r �' � `�` �r �� � �. � < < "+' . a��: f� ���r� , f �--�: . "�� �, � ir �y -�^�' _' =�' . _ ,� � �. ��.�^ � . , ;� _.. .� '-. ',r�:: � :.� �' . � -rR*me*rw ���J,,�(;�y :-. `�;� ' � � rJ;- -';�� � y�•:�� �_�'.� 'J � '7"y�J� ,� s � 7� � r � ,„ 1 E{ . . .. 7_ � � ��i-�; �, � �-� .... x� .} rir�:�i; _ . ��� :3�'�. ~ . i. ;�-..�' �."s r�.``. �F . ,c�i'�' i,tt��:�j�f _J'��s ` , rv�=�• �.r �G� F- �\" + -;`- .. :�- .�.� � ','rs.= : _ ��i.� + ti: Y,- �, - a. -.__r-� - _ _� � �~y• i� ��...r . , ..+:'t _k__, . 'J y 'i 1+- J .i+�� �' ` �1' !�,\� y •-�•-tY�:-. 7��' '- L � � " `• �r' �f�-. _r 'i'�.' ,. S; • . ' .� ..�:r�o�" A.1 "� "'� _ T-,• - .'�, �L'if Jh � � �^: : ' ,-x =�" .� _ �"�t• .�-': �-'��`- -�":� �r�'. wf �'�h , s: � : 3. � � ' t,.-�-. ' -t.; �, . �+�';� } �4 - � •. � �i' k-:. " "L�'� _ �.' �- : � ` : f• Y � � � � ��' � s � � . � ;.�1 ���...: ��' �' s�. f, ie:�ia -^w�.� ���."'�� `� '�'�` .�°'� .��. , �� - _ � � �' ' r _ �� � � . - - ,--� -� rf ,,. s,� ��IIII�Iqw � :_+r . � -- � �_ '�'i -- -. � � . . :�::. '� , _ - `� � 4 . ' .�, p � � ,� "_'�,. �� �� . r `-_ -..- - ����� � ' ::r ~ ;,i"`!� =,��-" -;;y��'SG�•'�'�' `�>�.. �.� .,� : - -. ^ ��?•� � .�, i /� � _ � � �� :/ � r � �+ s 'l;.�`�� �4 ' C' � , I ? 1 r� ""��? +: �' � 1�;, i _ ��: yndf .-:�.:- y;i.: i� � .ri ' :. � , � �� - * ^,�. �' � :- �. ..�--� , f r-,��j r . '. ~i� . ��1 - �� • r :� .��� � , a , r '� ;� r? � -.r 1�,�, � `'"---•_�"`- ''"�l ~ y. � ��'_ �,' F,, �-"' ,.,� .r�� _ �' .. ," �::�I � � � ti f. �� '�`t ,r^�Fi: � � s�� ����,� f � � .� � "�� ou��.' ,, � � �'r ,�( „ ,'` �..-� �.7 � ..�_'- :.i', r. �'.., .J! �` w��':�'� �� L ~n � [.: -Y i, _ r . _ 1�', , , , . �.: Y . N i .� � � . •�� l'w'-� � �` �� '��,� �� .' -. �i.f�`fi �' � � ' �:� �, .7. � � :�t� }• �17;,�'' '�.',� �. ���'� . - - � �Tr T• ° _ � � I�� �' � , .�y- :? s�' l:� .�.� ., :s; : _ � � �'1 �= � '•''r u � '�+ �� �� ,.� ��� -�� �� , ��. `u ,. .;• ., �, + � �} �.y '� � r-• ------{�-+ - ; _ * � ).' �'! %.'. _'� �` ` I � � . ..� �! � ;•. :�I:j ��— ` � � - ,�` y .�,r' �.�r�� �Y.+ '. �`1.- . .� �• ,." _ i .�i' '� _ � � �'��, � .j irl. � � SY � � '1 . e�' � - �� rf�� %� . I � L _ � "'J• �f x�[' � � �n- �1 . , ,� . �,� j ' - ^ �` � � r.,�,. � Iy,`ar`� ,Y �� ��� I � -- �.i .�,:.. r.�, � �.�ai���-y� i��`��_. �^_ _ - � � w ��t�. � iw�+� ■ - . 1F�r.ir.w..r�-. 4!� �� • -� • +� . �+i �i �;, r ��-1��� , �� , ''',�`� � � . ' ' Y �t-} ^�= " - � f,r �,- i' _ � .� , � � • .�- � -�' � ;� _� i �• , �. � � { r-� t y-�--_ , ,�` „� - - �cr - f �< �� � l►Fy{� - � � _ � +y' .':r.r7 r . _ - � � •� � � i,� +� �'S�-+` i �-.. . � . -} i � � �. - �� • � r • J � �� � � N r . ��. �� ` � _ �' �' �� � 1—!�FFrl� r" r ~ f� I I �4• � � � � � �� �� :�� � € � �� � - � A�����' ~ �� ��7�i��!WrZT�'� ��/� � r' � r . .� .t � r ,�,y�,� �r 7 ���{i:�� . � a �d: �� : . i. _ �' '"�. r�r'_��) '.£"G�r�lia��r.. " . .�.:�rr � . • - �• � {'`�f� ~�� �,� �', t� r'. , `,.. , '�✓� . , l'• , • , • /t`, y '4 � ,• �/ �•��! .%T # { ' f�r�, � � . •. ��'f. , ;` �s�y � ' i . Ct,.f.7Yf t � . � s��,� �:< .r . , i < %� �' v";.' i ";.�" 1 ,/ c. �.��� �t����� �`"'�' .� -�1w- ,�. �•. y ��:���•�. .�,•=�y- : �'.�. ..'. . �: X;•r. �t .-.. �•-�. ��f + � - -r w . s� ;s, +"�." �r • � � 'V' ; -'xt �.J.,{t `�" r '�"t`�r � + �' iE: -� �. � ti�t,s i�y� ,y� s`" '�' "' y s +., , � '�'' �'ti. rr�r. ;,� ; • . .> -f �r, 4r� , { �� r i� �� �� g �,y : . ,��, ,ti ; `>/.'.; ; ;: �, ,' �,�,�''� 0.,�4. :'3y � , . � b 'f�,�,''$�,1,��( n •�t� . i i LFA� 1^ �4 ' "r � 't •4�' , �'' � ��'. �iL ,''S". ,� fi `•:'';� y ���r/Z'(.1��f. J;, r✓. � � i_ ` j '' .'� �+�(t�.. P �;',:t�,ti+�? Q s �,�,�1� ��j � ,. ,. �R �, , j�<. �.•,�. ,, � �{': i�l ..s,:�`� �',I%^'a ;! ''[r,• }�,' +� , ��` ,{ �ic , 4 � � � • _,�}'� �7<�'• .,; . `4 �F�" �,� ` '' ^ `tl r��`�j , � + � f a � �•`..#r.� ' �+) J. ��! �", , a � 2t�.��ti • �,'��?��L � 5 � � �a`. � `t,•�t.. �t{�, .�r/' ;x :�.: )'f♦ ., Y,Y�1�`.t"`�'. . � c, ;��4�� . �'`��� iT.i' �:��4�}�4 'n1�`�•'::� ��i�' '�.-� � �,,��� � '., jt .: 3::,+,K�: .=. �� .:' s e,.s,.t�, � t y t , ` . + :.k':':. ;,�- .; . , . , � •;,4� s. • . � s� . � .�'., ,� Yi '� `�.:;:'•:�.� *. ..� :i: . .y2� ,; � � � •; • ! ' ' � +, ; . ,.. J, . `, `F. �+ `,�,.,, �; } ' , ..�5. � ♦� � �,� � i��j�J'��%���-..J:.� ' i1 � 1• }�� „ . . �(� , �, `�'��� �� � ���� �'�/ �� �'t„A 1J'i.rtl`t'�j�t•' . .. ' ' _ , ~ (, , , �r � �Y� �yf �... `� �iA�i��'��7,Y�. _ .�.,�' �� � � ,rr +� �. • yti,�'."�f�'►�4 ��x .�: . �+ `b�j , ;E-' . �,C�., `'rt�'t �: � �,,; , `� '' ' � � ��� �` �'��+ ' �"1 � � 4 - � y � �.?���``��~ �s ,� •{.�}` � {^��� , fr`���.���' �� }G� t i': f a t Y� +: � y�k'} � a/? '.}.`. µ t !'.' ti 1' •� t •r ` t' •„. ` t �!4t�• tT;. ,r `��`:.s�, t�' '� `' 'i � , `j� , . t . .. �. � ♦ '�.�,- f''�,�(�.'.t`, � 1 �Y � �j , `� t r� .. , . ;;�} �• . s'�l� . y i� . �,� � x �/ � '> > �jti`i��;� . ``y -� � . �},��", � • , f' �F / . . . . •• f� . `� j �•! . \ \ . / /t � ,� t e ` . . � �� < . � •,��, y `G, �� � . .e� S�J h. o � . t � t l . ' . �, •� + f , ' . .'" .r � , � ",: ; � �. ' ' �"5 1 . 'i�� f� � .r. � � '�-�, i,r;,�J'' . , !� • . , `I.� � ��'.� {'} F. ,t • . , , �..�'� ��d' -�" �: • , .�,,�„� ti, / f �. t .t i.� •• ' 'r�!' ''�_ f�r j�j+tf,{�tj,�'�,�y�,{y-� . : J Ls �1 � � `� r : i'/ (� U ! t ��.,�+t;, �E� ' ' ` .;f� .j { ,T I +�,� 'J�x� '�`i ftY.1J1iS� `ti �����'��`a l r,. j� , rtif��'s"�•��� ir� 4':� �;.{ ` , i`.S��j��c tt� �1.� ' ��� }�� . �,;- �j�e �; . .�Y�'c.�,!`�,/�! �{� ,�:i< � � `,!L'K.h. {' ,+ ^ / ... -.: r5��� � Z ty i . l � 1 `��.titi � •� �' � �tt � � ,�r , : f:• '� ��� ,, j dc. i �, ; j+f���:} fa �r � ,�"�� . 'Yf � '';,.�fii�l "e'1� 1- y A 4 ' x� �' � ��� ,� " r :;';.'���; f'�,. {� '�, . �o'', �.'�?`�,�}.f; �`ri':�,G y� t` y�,}y�` x r��^1�,` E�'.:N 5.'rf��4.,Ciis�L� i.�Y �''�.c'''� �`r?�� . �, . ' ,# t�`' �� "r ` , �r t� ' k�� �f ` r , • . ' ` � `*. �, , y,'/f� 'r{ � "�_r ` • �.��_i' :F6.K•fr� ,} '`i}, . . � . , � , ' ,r � , � ~ ' ` .i: ` f r�;"f , � ^ ,� ; ��.,= . J. - • ' � ;f `; r . r. "'i j'{� �. , �r,; ,. r`�y�, , f �-':� r y1`� ;� ,`l. �� ;h; ' . , y . , A,� J ^ ,.� ,'', }� �', �,, t l'� :�: t�`�1` ��{ t`;, r i' " � .`.+.`` ` 'I {..���y ;�,. Ij� �'�± �¢`` . � � :� ` f ' ��y ' �. ', i ;a��i"e�y?/.1�'l. �.�1 et'14'.'�Y: . .7 (.►.�rr :; �,�.l� `�'�,�, - �' / . ��, `�, «�.,'�"�e,� . r �.,� , .� � � � : � � ����� � ti � f r � � �� 3 t� ` liK�') � i�'+;{��'� �p� � ;1 � f,,�� �, +:,;.� � � .f � t �r5 l� �`� � ' / � i . ` � - `��t�, r e \ � l VT �f } �e �; r YS'�4 �•{ �;r Cr,`:�?,[ef�� f t ,� . :�� eastern edge of the Pa1m Springs USD and immediately west of the Desert Sands USD. The area is approximately 2,292 acres and contains approximately 200 residential units, which are located on streets that are accessed from Frank S�natra Drive. Currently, there are 48 students attending public schooi that live in these approximateIy 200 residential units: 18 attend schools in the Palrn Springs USD and 30 attend schools in the Desert Sands USD. Since 30 of the 48 students currently attend schools in the Desert Sands USD, this study focused on the impact of transferring the remaining 18 students, and future students where appropriate, from the Palm Springs USD to the Desert Sands USD. Rationale for Proposing Formation Resolution O 1-171 of t�e City Counctl of the City of Palm Desert states that: "The Ciry of Paim Desert desires that the City be serviced by only one schovl district, Desert Sands Unified School District to promote a unified communiry identity." Position of the Governing Boards The governing board of the Palm Springs USD has voiced opposition to the proposal. The governing board of ihe Desert Sands USD has expressed neutrality. Scope of the Study This study will examine the facts reiating to the nine conditions for school district reorganization as listed in EC §35753, and the Califomia Code of Regulations, T'itle 5(Titie 5), Subchapter 4, § l 8573. This study includes an analysis and findings about nine conditions of school district reorganization that are identified in EC§ 35753. These conditions are as follows: i. The new district will bc adequate in terms of number of pupils enrolled. 2. The districts are each organized on the basis of a substantial community identity. 3. The proposal will result in an equitable division of property and facilities of the original district or districts. 4. 'The reorganization of the district will not promote racial ar ethnic discriminallon or segregation. 5. 'The proposed reorganization will not result in any substantial increase in costs to the state. 6. The propased reorganization wili not significantly disrupt the edvcatianal programs in the proposed district and districts affected by the proposed reorganization and will cantinue to promotc sound cducational perfotmance in those districts. 7. The proposed reorganization will not result in a significant increase in school housing costs. � � 8. The proposed reorganization is not primarily designed to result in a significant increase in � properiy values causing financial advantage to property owners because territory was transferred from one school district to an adjoining district. � 9. "The proposed rearganization wil] not cause a substantial negative eif'ect on the fiscal management or fiscai status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization. tI0. Any other criteria as the board may, by regulation, prescribe. The study addresses each of the nine conditions in separate chapters. Review and analysis of data � are given for each condition for the affected districts. EC§ 35753 requires that statistics used in a study of this type be based on the year prior to the holding of an election. ` Data and Methodology Data used in the study consists of archival data from the California Department of Educati4n, California Department of Finance, the U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Education, County of Riverside, City of Palm Desert, and the affected districts. Interviews were conducted and input was received from governing board members and/or staff of the existing afi'ected districts and the Ciry of Palm Desert. Data were analyzed by a variety of inethods. Financial, pupil enrotlment, and staffing data were analyzed to determirie the effect on the school districts within the total territory or to deterrnine the Ieve1 of increase or decrease in variables siudied. Other archival data, and interview data were interpreted according to guidelines established in the Caiifomia Education Code and other published research in the area of school district organization. 4 EC §35753{aj(1 j: The new districts will be adequate in terms of number of pupils enrolled. General Finding The study finds that data contained in this section indicate that this condition would be substantially met. Standard of Review It is the intent of the legislature that duect service districts not be created which will become more dependent upon county offices of education and state support unless unusual circumstances exist. Therefore, each district affected must be adeyuate in teRns of numbers of pupils, in that each such district should have the following projected enrollment on the date the proposal becomes effective or any new district becomes effective for all pwposes: elementary district, 901; high school district, 301; unified district, 1,SOI. (Section 18573(a][1][A], Title 5, California Code of Re�ulations) Analysis of Data Table I-1 shows the historical enrollment of the Desert Sands USD. Table I-2 shows the historical enrollment of the Palm Springs USD. Table I-3 shows four years' historical enrollment for each school district and the students within the petition area that are within the Palm Springs USD who would be transferred to Desert Sands USD schools should th� petition be approved. Although there are 30 students within the petition azea that currently attend Desert Sands USD schools, they wouid not impact the enrollment of either district as a result of this actian. These tables indicate that both the Desect Sands and Palm Springs USDs would have more than the required i,501 students should the petition be approved. Tab1e 1-4 shows that the projected enrollm�nt for each district is forecast to grow within the next f ve years, the likely period in which this transfer would become effective, if approved. Findings/Conclusions This action would not cause a suff cient number of students to be transferred from the Palm Springs USD to the Desert Sands USD to make the Palm Springs USD a direct service district either at the time of this study or within the period that the proposed transfer would become effective if approved. 5 � � � IJ � iLl � .-I��nv Q m�v o��o co.-+r�v �c� O N e7 1� N [V m h 1� � N Q t'� OC a I� O O Of 0) a0 a� 1� 1� ch h� h v N u') N-� N N.- � � r e- .- � r- �- '- Q N p� � � rqO�O�C�g(V O<O� pq p -� � N m tA � 1!� f7 Q 1�. r� tfl O-f:OT COh10f�<OC')h OtOM N I � N � .-- r- •- •- •- •- r- N �•- N pqj •� �F � N� N ti �af0f N� T N C') � � Qf h m Cn m I� t0 (D � u'f c7 m Cf t0 l� �- tD r� r- �� �- � � � ��- � � � r- C�1 N QWf 'Q Npp t�J ti N f'�� t7 1� r� O UJ � m S M 07 If� CO 67 1� t0 iD LL� 4� t0 �/� fa tA N N O r' � � � �- � � �.- � e- �.- .- Nj N A tD 1� � O (y � p N Pl d' c+7 t7 N QI 'f� � tt7 N N r- 1'h �O h O Ql W h � OI It0 f� f� t0 tD N ifJ tA Q N tD 1� �t � � � �� � � � � � r- � ��+ e- �- �- �- N Q�I� ��NCND�G��p�QN�m�.�-�Q O� �O 1� t0 tD < sf IA � I � � � � r.= r � � r.- � � O N q.p��t�N-t�NN�O.-Ap .-�C �N r� f� r (� � tIJ Q � iD 01 fD4'f1n va��<�?NtDtOc'70� tA �'���.-�.-���r-� ��.-.� � i OYl ��D W QT' �C�7K)�ti����OY�M O� i Q tA Q Y��f Q Q c7 N��A Ql t0 � e� �- r� � � � e- e- '- e- � t0 � al«�����Q�gQ��m�� r' �.- �- r � � � � �'- � � � 1� � ao C p ' O�f�c�v� �<�e+f V �i�N �O��t'') � � r � � ��— r- e- � � � � ►� �I ���,�,�m���ON�,�Sm ���Q������������ � � � � �- � .- .- .. .- .- � .- �c � WI!^�f�NpN ��Q�GI�Oti ��Q�Q10i�:1tlf p� (� C? t7 N t? N N.� r � N N� CO 4 "" � �.- � v- � � r � � � tP � tD eri f� CN��A cO�l tf9 1� h. 0 W 1r! tO h Q) � NfNN�.N-O.^-r�-N�ir�.QN O�fINc7N _ � ��- '- � � e- r � r r�- � O�I�NNNN�00 �Qf.�-�NQf�� O � � r � r�- r- � � � Q � 0~0 , C�7 O Q NQ��m fQD� QI t� W O� O7 N 1�0p Q c7 p! I � N � O Qf Of �� m � � N� tn � S � r � r.- r' �"� 1�0p Q�� t7 NQ� �Tp Q� � 1 1f7 h. � 47 � O O� O r O � Qf C�D OG OD �� � h �" � .- r .- fV . � IA h� � O�V Ppf m at N .Mp CD �t CO N G PN- a O�! O�Q�O�fD�ti OO��A 0�7t^DtAf�t� � � � ����m�����m������� �: a � �,:�������m ���"' �'� a'�m������ ���� � r- I o N at Qf �- �� N v C� h tmD �p 1y7� O� O�i ��Sti°'a�D��n N�tDtDUI m �- � t'D �fJti O�mf ��� N�p� 0�11�OQN Of f� m f� i� ti fD � f� 1� tD tD t� tn r] � Qj iZ ,� W U a -� o�er� (� �- N l"! <�tf f0 1� CD W O! r- r r Vl W�0.' IiJ W 1{l LL1 W W t�! W p 1L W W W� J p;W p p O O O OQ .O[ QO w QQ O4 O O W Q Q'�<a���atataaata��a0 c71Yt7c�t7c�t7c9c7c7rnt9t7t7t9v�r- '!'� m � � � � V .�. W � � � W � a a W G Q � � � � Q V U � � y � � r � � � W J LL O � a H' Z ti.� � J � z W J Q V � 0 � � � � � �,^ V z � a � i J a I pp tCJ et CD � tA N C � O O� N O N O�•- �G c7 < ef t 1 e- O O W t0 O Y�OJ�a�m�►:ao�n .-vv,o �n N � � t- r � ��- �- �- � N � ��- r N O f7 �IJ f7 C� N �V �^ O� O� r' O� O I tt� N tD N c� � N Q) Nlltl W f0 C� f� f� tD 11� Q m IlJ N Q) m i��.- r �e-e�-r � .-�r p N C� I tD �A �t OD O� t7 tD 1� � O�� �f1 h G t0 O� -c+) tD � O tD W7 M e0 � A cO �- Of CO h m 1� f� i0 ��t Q M N � N � �.- � �.- �.- .- .- .- e- r- � p . � m�f O�tOtt�DCD pt�p�00��G�iNN�p �1� p� �� ti tA ti CO �fl �ff Q C� h�.- Q� �7 � r r � � � � � � � � � � � � !� � M C7 .- e� �p M �f7 C7 f� h tn f� Q O� t7f NOQ M 01CdtD<Dp� �-�p CO�'7S ef tOtoh u7vv,c�lclNc7tD.-CaD��a � � r- e- �- ��- �- e- r- � r r- q7 I � Q�flc'J�Q�f Cf ntiU �m�.�-�pNO�iQN p� 1� ti tn tt� Q c'7 C�l c7 � t+� t0 f� O 1� �- r � � r�- � � e- �- � e- ��- � r vi �Oo tOcO N�Q��T Mtf)�Ntp CJ1 a��OC Y tD� I��A V e0 O�-O�NOCD Of tP�D�� QMCJNN(V �O�-'QftD�-1n r' � r�- � e^ �-- � � � � � ►� r �f IQ ��D Q1 *' f� f7 ln �p � LO f� O Y� �{ tyf 01 �O p CD �r QI Y7 Q f•I Qf tA p fD ti� h O Q p� Q�I7� vMcnNN NM14tAt0`-h � � �._ .- .- �.- .- �.- � � <p � � mNh. Q� rN�dm�cOlnP.MN Np� OiINCTItn� OQ1�� �tt�N1��IV �fV p� ��� �QNNN�NQ�mI� Q ���r-�� �-r��-� � Ip N=�Om��N��N�A�m�N�� O� I� h tl7 Q> Q p�l � �<+f C?l7Nr-'-NNOc�tD N � r �.- r r- �- '- � � .� � tD � ' o��e��i� �irdic°�T"oc�ir-ocmc�o�i o+.�v_�ec+�e�c����ic�N afv� �o �.- � � � �.- •-. •- � � vi � O NNN<f NNV' 1�t7NR �tD�Af� CII f�N�<Y7�f�(Y OQiQ)W�f�fV pi C�c�enc�e��OGf �Nc7mm Q �-� � � � � � � � � � � Of=mMhQ�p �f� va�-M^�� 1�0 fA .nf f0 f� !+7 !r! � � Of �CV fV N N � O� � N(n � Y] M �' �- r � � �.- c� � m m tt� r- 10 O m N 1t� r OD fD 1f1 V' h c7 m � N W tD tCf 1� Q � fD C� e [D � Q1 � r N r- O� m OD m P � m!� � tn � �� r � '- �- CV . r h 1��CONQtO���OCY.-N�OtO m(� p 1� ��� N N � f� 1l1 1fJ C� OD Q1 O O� CO m� m h I� fL W W �- � I� � � � . T m��p� ���N�vQQfiA�c�N�� �N Q! id) fA iJ1 !� I� f� tD fD m h W 1n O � YY I 1n �A N� O Qf � tA r" CO O h ao�c$enornornu�c�.-r�c`Tio�ico ~n ��mm������� �m�� � �; � Q e� lA �A CD r- m QI Vf N 01 N�� Ri P'IIi I� W�Tm 1Ci�CDQ:��iil�< Q� I H- tP tD tA CD tD tn tD 1� tD tD Q' CD r' - q� � � W �Qu�t!'f MO>C)M c�cryMO� m � f+ N� m ��fi �l � d ch h C7 Of Of � CO tD cD tD tn It� tD tD tD I� t0 �tl tA O �I m fV �(0 m O� W CQO CpA c�p � � Q iD O tOt7f ��t7pp0 fY C�i�<Oi�DIl71f�u'f�'JiD�Ot�D�tDtD�� �C�D_ r' - � �'QfHQ-fpDO�O Wr .�pMQ mtiN �� O�f ilf �A 1!'7 � t0 tD t0 t0 �A tD � �!7 �f7 Q �I � Z W �� W V . Q r O a� N W C�1 �NMfd �eftoheo WOi�-��U1 11lI�WWILWW WWW WLLILUW �i=aaa[�ad��a��a���aaCdO C9=Y(7(7U' C7C9U' U� C9tnC9GC9U' tAH N d .� � F" PETITION AREA STUDENTS ATTENDING PALM SPRINGS USD SCHOOLS DESERT SANDS USD ENROLLMENT 1998 1999 2000 2001 l BEF(?RE BEFORE BEFORE BEFORE PETiTION � GRADE TRANSFER TRANSFER TRANSFER TRANSFER AREA2001 KINDERGARTEN 1,70fi 1,792 1,758 9,867 2 � GRADE 1 1,882 1,870 2,011 2,025 GRADE 2 1,834 1,914 1,934 2,034 2 GRADE 3 1,773 1,826 1,900 1,974 2 1 GRADE 4 1,fi21 1,T80 1,823 1,928 3 � GRADE 5 1,633 1,fi20 1,789 1,898 3 GFtADE 6 1,537 1,676 1,659 1,8�4 GRAOE 7 1,571 1,561 1,719 1,720 3 � GRADE 8 1,fi10 '1,585 1,600 1,787 1 SP. ED. ELEM 308 324 352 376 GRADE 9 1,7d5 1,810 1,731 1,776 1 � GRADE 10 1,854 1,911 2,040 1,981 GRADE 11 1,518 1,622 i,6T4 1,725 i GRADE 12 1,289 1,333 1,3'19 1,4W � SP. ED. SEC 200 191 191 233 TOTA� 22,037 22,815 23,500 24,582 18 PALM SPRINGS USD ENROLLMENT GRADE KINDERGARTEN GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GkADE 8 SP. EQ. ELEM GRADE 9 GRADE 10 Gt7ADE 11 GRADE 12 SP. ED. SEC 70TAL 1998 9999 2000 BEFORE BEFORE BEfORE TRANSFER TRANSFER TRANSFER 1,598 1,636 1,553 1,776 i,765 1,825 1,666 1,814 1,863 1,736 1,708 1,822 1,607 1,769 1,732 1,509 1,653 1,790 1,509 1,53fi 1,622 1,401 1,487 1,519 1, 395 1,4 i 4 1,473 0 0 0 1,793 1,888 1,885 1,342 1,334 1,510 1,125 1,275 1.262 901 937 991 0 0 0 19,358 20,2i6 2d,847 2001 AFTER TRANSFER - 1,869 2,025 2,036 1,976 1,931 1,901 1,814 1,723 1,788 376 1,777 1,981 1,726 1,444 233 Za,soo 2001 BEFORE PETITION 2001 AFTER TRANSFER AREA 2001 TRANSFER 1,558 2 1,556 1,815 1,815 1,814 2 1,812 1,868 2 1,866 1,839 3 7,836 1,745 3 9,742 1, 742 1,742 1,630 3 1,627 1,519 1 1,518 0 � 2,101 1 2,100 1,418 1,418 1,401 1 1,400 1,082 1,082 a o 21,532 18 21,514 � Table I-3 Z W � O I.L � W W � LL �" � � �o y m Q Q W � � O � ti 0 d N t0 O O N � O 0 N H � Q C) � ol � ol� N 1-- N Q U W oc O LL F-- Z � � J J 0 � Z w 0 � 7 � � Z Q � � � W � � �"' Z W � � a c.i coa��ncv�na�r-ch�cocDrn� �/� f7 G1 1� � N� � tD f� M l'^1 C7 N tV N N N Ch 1() .- f� � NNNNNCVNfVfYNN�N �t Cf U) �P crl CO e- M f� f� r t0 CO gj ca r� .- i. r� .- r� rn m �• c e� u� ,� �chchNNN��r-NetO(D N N N N N N N N N fV N N r N �A00►�� MI�tD1A�11�1+] � o �NNN� �-� � �N�C71t~O. N N N N N N N N N N N r � N NO��i�c�ot�c+�mtONO�� NN� r-0000�--�� � N N N N N N N N N N � � N o���N O ef t0 vt t7 Q� M�� �p ch p CO �- Q N ���0 OO�O�Of•-I�ef �- N N N N N N•- r- � N � r N N O 0 N W � Z Q x V � O O N O � a O N �� Qf � � � � r i COcri NN� s� c'7�t�ID�� NO���t��tD �A�p1�� ��OO�Of�aO�Q>OhQ � N N N�- �- � � � r' N r r N O��C1tDID �C�rlIA4�h.M� V N In th � � N rfV�N� In �D tD •" � �t � CO I� ��p � N t7 (� t7 p � N a0 t� 00 N� p�j d O Q� � O� aD 1� 1� !� C1 f� � N N � � r v- .-- �- r- �- � � N OD��Oc�O�QIC� �Oe�'�1C�~ �OQfO�f.aND.ti�I� .�Ot^D.trl� r N e— � � � r- r r� N�� N N O� tQ O O cD � u� �.— N c'� $ � 1� � N 4� N f� �p � r. N f� � '� � Q� �O 1� f0 tC IA . O� C1 �O Crl � � � � � � � � � � � � �� N nNOc'�.- c�f+r-O � � a�0. a�0. ti t�0_ t�0. N� t�p. C�� c0 � 1� W tf� N � � r- � � � ��- r ^ - ' ' � � � � � N ,� Oti-N � e'- N i'7 'e! In t0 1� 00 Qf �- � e- ts! � W W{IJ W W W W W 1tJ LZJ W IJJ J oWoo 0o aooaoaQ aaaa�Qa�aaaaaa� �c ?��oc��ac��cc��c�o (7� Y U' G U' t7 C9 i7 C7 C7 C9 U' C7 U' F- a�coao.-c�coc�coc�voc�rnch � � f� 1� c7 tD O Ih cD CY N c� N �o� N C�CJ1�1� W�CaC:Jt�t7Q1f� � � � � � ��- ��- e- � N �.- •r N t0 O O N tDtO �Nc'�c+fOf�1�O�0�0� � � tn� tAtUNtOhNtOtD��A M M �ttG hhCOWCOaDcfDc�aDP � � � �- .- �-- r � � r- N � �- t- M N O�� ti 0� M�� t�h �.�{�j N �^ �� t_ P W�� CO 00 CO N CO �O C7 � F-N �� ��-'-.-���N��- f- N Q U W� �Cp rN0 h�N1Ar'�A C70 � f� Q1 N ED f� �- O m Q tl') ��� f+ f� � CO 00 Ca 1� N 1� � C7 � tL N ' N �- r- .- .- .- �- � � � N r- e- �- N y � ���U�9 o~NO�1~�ti .�-- �A Q N �I�cD��OftOhl��tOY7 �- s� ( i � � ��- �- .- � � r- N � �- �-- N W � � o co co ao co r� co c� �n v � a� � co f- t7 f� � N CD U7 r- f� N 1� � N � Z N� 1� oD aD a0 1� f� t0 o tp P] �- (yJ �-������-�-�N� � �- N � ..J J O w ^p ^"' r- QN�r-rOOv���D CO tfj Q' U� N N Cr1 � N N �7 `-' �A C�7 Q) r- Z Z `-' N �'' 'n v .' � w Q n � � U � � � �p �RN�p�p NNf�COQCOUQ N � 0 �fs.-.-tDt�Q�N�v�"' d0 � Z N tl] CD OD m� 1� f� tC tfJ r- �� O � �.- .- r�- � r- �- N � � �- •- � N a � � O M In i''f N N O N Of C7 � O N � 1� J O�t"� N �p N l+1 Q) N � h Q N tt� OO 00 CO !� 1� �D 1n � m IA N a� .-•� �.����.-.-�� r- � N Z W � o� to tn '�t m Q� th tC ti st y� t� tfl O1 c'� tL� .-- O t0 �n ch a0 � �- � Ot CD h W t� ►� tD tf7 Q et C'O N Q�f N �.i r- � �.- r � ��- � � � r�- N Q�i C�iti c0�p~ OQ�ic�N�A �� Ql Il') h tD f� tG �� d:M ��j �.�.. �j �''� r r- � r�- � � � �- �- r- �' � � T Z W H � Q o .- cr (7 � N e+� d' Y9 tD 1� m Of r e- � � W W ttJ W W L1J W tiJ W lli LJ W J z����a������ �o �GC9i9C?C7C7C7U' CJC�(3C7 C�F- � d .fl � � � � � EC §35753(a)(2): The districts are each organized on the basis of a substantial communi#y identity. �� General Finding � The study finds that data contained in this section indicate that this condition would be substantially meE. � Standard of Review The folIowing criteria from Section 18573(a)(2), Title 5, Califomia Code of Reeularions, should � be considered to determine whether a new district is organized on the basis of substanNal community identity: isolation; geography; distance between social centers; distance between schoo] centers; topography; weather; communiry, school and socia) ties; and other circumstances � peculiar to the area. FindingslConclusions Isolation, Geography, Topography, and Weather The Coachella Valley is relatively flat with typical southern California desert conditians. Weather and topography aze similar throughout the valley. Because the region is divided into three school district service areas along the axis of population and urban developmenE, the service areas near the eastern boundary of the Palm Spring USD are somewhat isolated from.the Palm Springs area, which is Iocated in the westetn portion of the district. The territory transfers reviewed in the backgound section of this report have mostly oceurred along the boundary separating the Desert Sands and Palm Springs USDs. Community, Schoof, and Socia! Ties and Other Circumstances Peculiar To The Area Tt�e Coachelis Valley has become a resort community for the Southern Califomia area. The residents of the area include a large retired or semi-retired population and a population of service workers. Most of the retired population do not identify with the school disfict in which they reside. Residents in both districts appear to idenrify with the iocal government, usually the city government, that serves them. This is evident in the naming conventions that the Palm Springs USD has used for some of its schools, for example: Cathedral City High School, DeseR Hot Springs High Schooi, and Rancho Mirage Elementary School. Similarly, Deserc Sands has named some af its schools after local areas: Indio High School, Indio Middle School, La Quinta High School, La Quinta Middle School, Palm Desert High School, and Palm Desert Middle School. � Some communities on the fringe service areas of school districts have sought to realign their I school district service area with the district that serves the majority of the students in the city in which they reside. As evidence of this trend, requests for school district realignment along the Patm Springs - Desert Sands USD boundary have generally been to realign the boundary westward to include additional territory that was served by the Palm Springs USD within the � City of Palm Desert. Of the two requests for territory transfers from the Desert Sands USD to the Palm Springs USD within the past 20 years, one was dropped from consideration and one was p, disapproved. Palm Desert residents with school —age children, pay Ciry of Palm Desert taxes and are subject to the decisions of the City of Palm Desert. Residents in Paim Desert identify with Palm Desert and many want their children to attend Pa1m Desert schools. When notif ed by Palm Springs USD that students in this temtory reside in the cwrent attendance areas of schools in Cathedral Ciry and Thousand Palms, parents of 30 of the 48 public school students who reside within the area decided to pursue other options such as inter-district transfers. Statements made by proponents of the pecition reinforced this fact through testimony at the April l 5, 2002 pubiic hearings. 7 � EC §35753(aj{3): The proposal will result in an equitabie division of property and facilities of the original district or � districts. GGeneral Finding � The scudy finds that data contained in this section indicate that this condition would be substantially met. � Standard of Review To determine whether an equitable division of property and facilities will occur, the California � Department of Education reviews the proposal for compiiance with the provisions of Education Code sections 3556U and 35564 and determines which of the criteria authorized in Section 35736 shall be applied. The California Deparhnent of Education also ascertains that the af%cted � districts and county office of edncation are prepared to appoint the committee described in Section 355b5 to settle disputes arising from such division of property. fCalifornia Code of Re�ulations, Tiile 5, Section l 8573[aJ[3)) � Findings/Conclusions The division of real and personai property, funds and obligations (except bonded indebtedness) is provided for in EC§§ 35560 through 35565 and 35736. In addition, to provide for this equitabl� distriburion, Title S, § 18573 states: � (3) To determine whether an equitable division of property and facilities will occur, the Department (Califomia Department of Education) will determine which of the conditions [� authorized in EC§ 35736 shall be appiied. It shall also ascertain that the affected districts t' and the County Office of Education are prepared to appoint the committee described in EC§ 35565 to settle disputes arising from such division of property. � Education Code §35565 states: � If a dispute arises between the governing baards of the districts conceming the division of funds, properry, or obligations, a board of arbitrators shall be appointed which shall resolve the dispute. The board shall consist of one person selected by each district from � which territory is withdrawn pursuant to a reorganization action under this chapter, one person selected by each district of «�hich territory has become a gart pursuant to that reorganization action, and either one or two persons, such that the board of arbitratars � contains an odd number of persons, appointed by the county superintendent of schaols of the counry in which the districts aze located. 'fhe districts involved may mutually agree that a person appainted as arbitrator by the county supenntendent of schools may act as 8 � � sole arbitrator of the matters to be submitted to arbitration. The necessary expenses and � compensation of the arbitrators shall be divided equally between the disficts, and the payment of the portion of the expenses is a legal chazge against the funds of the school districts. The arbitrator or arbitrators shall make a written finding on the matter I submitted to arbitration. ?he written finding and determination of a majority of the board of arbitrators is final and binding upon the school districts submitting the question to the board of arbitration. I'1 � The laws and regulations for determining how the assets and liabilities of reorgariized school districts are to be divided are answered by the above referenced Education Code sections. Personal properry, real property, and bonded indebtedness are treated separately in this analysis. Division of Assets Education Code Section 35560 states: When a schooi district is reorganized and when the allocation of funds, property, and obligations is not fixed by terms, conditions, or recommendations as provided by iaw, the funds, property, and obligations of a former district, except for bonded indebtedness, shall be allocated as follows: (a} The real properry and personal property and fixtwes normally situated thereat shall be the property of the district in which the real property is located. (b) All other property, funds, and obligations, except bonded indebtedness, shall be divided pro rata among the districts in which the temtory of the former district is included. The basis for the division and allocation shall be the assessed valuation of the part of the former district which is included within each of the districts. In Caiifornia's post Proposition 13 environment, assessed valuation may not be the rnost equitable basis on which to divide assets. Recent school district reorganizations have based asset division on average daily attendance (ADA} on the theory that assets should be divided on the basis of students to be served. This study will use three bases to divide property: ADA, assessed valuation and enrollment. Assets and liabiliries that are either funded or expended based on per- student formulas are partitioned based on A.DA. Those that are funded based on capital programs, such as school facilities funds and obtigations and other capital programs are based on assessed valuatian. Studeni body funds are divided based on enrollment. ADA and Assessed Valuation Calculations 'The ADA and assessed valuation for thc Desert Sands and Palm Springs USDs would be affected by ihe proposed formation. Table III - l shows ADA, unadjusted for interdistrict transfers, for the districts. The impact of interdistrict transfers is estimated to account far less than one percent of ADA. The ADA of each district is based on pupil attendance including the attendance of interdistrict transfer students. A.DA does not measure students who live within a district; it measures students who attend a district's schools. � � I� � � � � � Table III -1 2000-01 Average Daily Attendance {ADA) P-2 Pe�cent of Dlstricts AOA Total ADA EXISTING DESERT SANDS USD 21,207 na PROPOSED TERRITORY 70 BE TRANSFERRED 17 O.U9% REMAINlNG PALM SPRINGS USD 19,242 99.91 % TOTAL 19�259 100.00% SOURCE: DESERT SANOS ANO PALM SPRINGS USDs 2000-07 AUDIT REPORT AND DlSTR1CT STUDENT DATA FlLES 'I'able III - 2 shows the 2001-02 assessed vaivation for each of the existing districts and ihe percentage of assessed valuation of each district as compared to the total assessed valuation of the combined districts. Tabl� III - 2 Assessed Valuation (A1� DisVibution AV BEFORE Percant ot � R POSED TERRITOR TO BE iRANSFERREp ',,REOR � 2 17A6 IO�N7 _To; o�Y� REMAINING PAIM SPRlNGS USO 10.597,872,482 99.1096 [1 TOTAL 27,901,851,303 200.00K SOURGE: CAUFORNlA MUNICIPAL STATlST1CS AND METROSCAN AV AFTER RE�RGANIZATION 17,304,078,821 10,597,872,482 27,901,951 �303 Real Property and Personal Property Normally Situated in Each District (Open and Operating School Sites) There are no existing schooi sites within the proposed territory to be transferred. The City of Palm Desert has designated two future school sites that wovid be available for purchase if approved by the CDE and the district's governing board. These sites and futwe schools as designated by the Palm Springs USD, which currently serves the area are projected to be adequate to serve lhe estimated student population tl�at would reside in the current 200 and future 5814 dwelling units within the petition area. in Funds and Other Obligations G One of the initial tasks of the reorganized districts would be to determine the equitable division. of assets and Iiabilities pursuant to EC§ 35560 (b). Examination of annual audit reports (2000- O1) for each of the school districts affected indicates that the fund balances of the districts prior to the approval of the proposed territory to be transferred are as shown in Table III - 3. TABLE III - 3 SUMMARY OF FUNO BALANCES TO BE DiViDED DESERT SANOS SOURCE PALM SPRINGS FUND USO PA(3E USD BUILOIMG �. � .... � � �.�.`... �... •• � S 176 i1.6. �. _ . 5 5,368,348 CAPITAL FACILIIIES S 21,28d,905 Il.fi S 581,502 CAPITAL PROJECTS S 39,913,132 1.4 S 12,047,350 DEBT SERVICE S 4,329,495 1.4 S 3,T64,927 DEFERRED MAINTENANCE S 71,217 11.3 S 11,862 SPECWL RESERVE S 3,982,120 SPECIAL RESERVE {CAPITALj S 22,103,121 1.19 - Q.6 S 5,674,424 SPECIAL REVENUE 5 1,922,687 1.4 S 4,349,422 S7ATF/CQUNTY SCHOOL FACILIT►ES S 374,703 11.6 S 322,287 S7ATE SCHOOL LFJ�SE PURCHASE PROGRAM S - 11.6 S 91,189 TAX OVERRIDE S 4,066,829 CAFE7ERIA S 712,643 11.2 CHARTER SCkOOL S 1,016.190 11.3 CH1LD DEVE�OPMENT $ . 11,2 GENERAI. • UNRESTRiCTED E 7,796,449 1.3-4 GENERAL - RESTRICTEQ S 4,09fi,756 1.3-4 S7UDENT 80DY TOTAL S 107,684,303 SOURCE: DESERT SANOS ANO PALM SPRlNGS t/SQs 2800-01 AUDIT REPORT AND 2,000 9,528,407 4,768,832 S Sd.508,270 SO URC E PAGE lI.S � 11.5 1.4 1.4 I1.3 I1.3 11.6 1.4 11.6 11.5 11.2 1.14 1.14 The coiumns labeled Sowce Page in the above table indicate the page within the annual audit report of the appropriate district from which the data were taken. Funds related direcdy to the number of students and ADA are iisted in Table III - 4. TABIE III - 4 FUND BALANCES TO BE pIVIDED BASED ON AVERAGE DAIlY ATiENDANCE {ADA) FUND CAFETERIA� ---.._ , , ,.,,,,,,. . CHARTER SCHOOL CHILD DEVELOPNIENT GENERAL-UNRESTRICTED GENERAL - RESTRICTED TOTAL DESERT SANDS SOURCE USD PAGE .�.. _� S 7t2,643 II'i S 1,016,190 11.3 S - 11.2 S 7,T96,449 1.3-4 S 4.096.756 1.3-4 S 13,622,038 PALM SOURCE SPRINGS USD PAGE 2,000 11.2 9,528,40T 1.14 4.768.832 1.14 14,294,239 SOURCE: DESERt SANOS AND PALM SPRfNGS t/SDs ?OOD-01 AUDfT REPpRT AND AJSTRfC7 S7!lDENT DAiA FlLES � � } Funds related to property or other fixed assets are listed in Table III - 5. � Table III - 5 Fund Balances to be Divided Based on Assessed Valuativn (AVj OESEfiT SANDS SOURCE PALM SPRINGS � Fund „ , ,,,._S „ . _ USb 76 PAGE I1S0 CAPITAL FACILITiES 21,280,905 � 11.5 3 5.368.348 11.6 S 591,502 CAPITAL PROJECTS S 39,913,132 1.4 3 12,047,350 � DEBT SERVICE S 4,329,495 1,4 S 3,764,927 DEFERRED MAINTENANCE 5 i1,217 11.3 S 97,862 SPECIAL RESERVE S 3,982,120 SPECIAL RESERVE {CAPITAL) S 22,103,121 1.19 -11,6 S 5,674,024 � SPSCIAL REVENUE S 1,922,687 1.4 3 b,349,422 STATEICOUNTY SCHOOL FAC1�I71ES 3 3T4,703 II.S S 322,287 STATE SCHOOL LEASE PURCHASE PROGRAM S • 11.6 3 91,189 TAX OVERRIUE E 4,066,829 � 7ota! 3 94.062,265 S 36,209,031 SOURCE: DESERT SANDS AND PALM SPRiNGS IISDs 1000-01 AUDlT REPORT AND DISTRlCT STUDENT DA7A F1LES � � � SOURCE PAGE l i.5 11.5 1.4 !.4 �1.3 I1.3 I I.6 1.4 Il.6 I I.5 If the ADA based funds were divided on the basis of ADA, using the proportionate ADA of tbe proposed temtory to be transferred within the Palm Springs USD to the entire Palm Springs USD ADA, the distribution of ADA funds atlacated to the Desert Sands USD would be $12,83 0 ar 0.09 percent of the Palm Springs USD A.DA as shown in Table IiI - 6. Table t!I - 6 Proposed ADA Fund Balance Division AOA Based Fund ADA 8ased Fund Percent of Balances Befora Balances After DfsMcts Total AOA Formatlon Fornoatlon FXISTING DESERT SANDS IfSD na ���� 3 13,62�,038 S 13,634,868 PROPOSED TERRlTORY 70 BE TRANSFERR�D 0.09% S 12,830 REMAINlNf3 PALM SPRItVGS USD 99,91 % 3 14,286,409 S 14,286,409 TOTAL S 2T,921,277 S 27,921.277 SOURCE: DESERT SANDS AND PALM SPRINGS USDs 2000-0! AUDlT REPORT AND DISTR/CT STUDENT DATA �ItES If the funds for property and other fixed assets were divided on an assessed valuation (AV} basis, using the praportionate AV of the proposed territory to be transferred within the Palm Springs USD as listed in Table 1II — 3, the distribution of groperty related funds would be as shown in Table III - 7. l? Table III - 7 Proposed Assessed Valuation (AV) Fund Balances Division AV 8ased Fund Balances AV Based Fund Percent oi eefore BalancQs After Otstricts total AV Farmatlart Formation EXISTIMG DESERT "' � � SANOS USD "—' "" � � �1Q000% 3 �.9�i,062,265 S 94,389,705 � PROPOSED TERRITOitY TO BE iRANSFERRED 0.909'o S 327,440 REMAINING PALM SPRIMGS USD 99.109'0 $ 35,881,591 S 35,881,591 T�TAL s 130,271,Y96 ; 130,271,296 SOURCE: DESERT SANDS AND PALM SPR/NGS USQs 2000-0'! AUDIT REPORiAND DlSTRICT STL/DENT DATA F1LES The totai proposed distribution of funds would be a combination of the distributions listed in Table III - 8. pistrlct Table III - 8 Summary of Fund Balances to be Divided Assessed ADA Based Valuation Based Assets Assets EXISTING DESERT SANDS USD $ 13,634,868 3 94,389,705 PROPOSEp TERRITORY TO BE TRANSFERRED a - $ - REMAINING PALM SPRINGS USO 5 1Q.286,409 3 35,881,591 TOTAL = 27,921�277 S 130,271,296 SOURCE: DESERT SANOS ANO PALM SPRlNGS USDs Y000-01 AUDIT REPORT AND D/STR/CT STUDENT DATA F/LES Division of �iabilities Totai Assets 108,024,573 50,168, 00 0 158,192,573 As with the division of assets, the division of liabilities applies to the liabilities of the tercitory of Palm Springs USD that would be partitioned. The liabilities of each of the districts prior to formation, including bonded indebtedness, that were examined are listed Table III — 9. Because the financial information was based on the 2000-01 audit reports of each district, the recent general obligation bond approved by the voters of the Desert Sands USD was not included. 13 i 7able III - 9 Summary of Long Term Debt DESERT SANOS SOURCE PALM SPRINGS SOURCE PAGE USD PAGE Unfu de C . _— �P m en p satad Absences 8 VacaUon �� �''S �2,847,116 1.19 � S 2.148,975 1.14 Mello Roos Community Facilitles Distrfct {CFD) S 2,285,000 1.19 Certlflcabs of Panlcipatlon 3 76,724,455 1.19 General Obll�ation Bonds E 74,895,600 1.14 Capftal La�sas S 1.891,375 1.19 3 2,i74,688 1.16 Stafe School Buliding Ald Loans EC §163i0, et seq. Tatal S 83,T4T,946 S 79,218,663 DEBT U5TE0 WITIi THlS COLOR JS PAfD FROM LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES SQURCE: DESERT SANAS AND PALM SPRl/YGS bSDs 2000-0! At1Dlf REPOR T AND OISTRICT STUDENT DATA FfLES Table III — 9 does not include the recently approved general obligation i�ond debt of the Desert Sands USD because it is not reflected in the 2000-01 audit report. However, since the proposed territory to be transferred is completely within the Palm Springs USD, omission of the recent Desert Sands USD general obligation bond data would not alter the results of this anaiysis because this debt would not be divided as a result of this reorganization. The debt in Table III - 9 has been separated into debt that relates to ADA and debt that relates to assessed valuation by the same method that was used for division of assets. Tabies I1I - l 0 and 11 show the appropriate ADA and assessed valuation sepazativns. Tabla Iil -10 Liabilitles to be Divtded Based on ADA . OESERT SANDS SOURCE PALM SPRINGS 50URCE Dobt Cat�ory, USO PAGE USD PAGE Untunded Compensat�d Abs�nces 3 Vac aUon S 2,847,116 1.19 S 2.148,9T5 1.14 Total S 2,84T,118 3 2,148,975 SOt1RCE: DESERT SANpS AND PALM SARlNGS t1SDs 2000-Of AUDfT RFPORT AND OfSTR1CT STl/DENT DATA FlLES Tabla fll -11 Liabflities to be Ofvided Based on AV DESERT SANDS SOURCE PALM SOURCE SPRINGS USD PAGE Wbt Catspo�--- ..,...— --•• IiSD PAGE... —...,.-- � — -• . . Msllo Roos Comunity k�ciliti�i OfsFrid (CFD} S 2.285,000 1.19 CMffksl�sotParticipstion S 76,724,455 I.i9 (ienenl ObllQaUon 8onds S 7�.895,000 1.14 Capkal La�sa S 1 691 375 1.19 S 2.174 6B8 I.16 Total S 80�00�30 S n,069�i89 DEBT LISTEQ WITH tMfS COLOR /S PAID FROM LOCAL PROPERTYTAXES SOURCE: DESERT SANOS AND PALM SPRlNGS USOs 2000-01 AUWT REPORT AND DlSTRlCT STUDENT DAtA RLES 14 � � � Tables III - 12 and 13 show an example of the division of debt for both ADA based debt and AV based debt. Table III -12 Proposed ADA Debt o� l.fability Division ADA LIabIlfUes ADA Based Percent of Balancas Before UabiliUes Aker Districts Total ADA Formation FortneUon ��EXISTING DESERT SANDS USQ �� —' ... ma S' 2,847,116 S 2,849.044 PROPOSEO 7ERRRORY TO BE TRANSFERRED 0.09% S 1,926 REMAIMING PALM SPRINGS USD 99.9194 S 2,147,047 S 2,1AT,047 TOTAI = 4,996,091 S ,,996,091 SOURCE: DESERT SANDS AND PALM SPRlNGS IJSDS ?D00-01 AUDiT REPORT AND OlSTRlCT STUAENT AATA FfLES Table I!I -13 Proposed AV Liabilities Division Percent AV Based AV Liabllitt�s of Totsl Ltat�illtias Balore Balancos Afte� Districta AV Fortnatlon Formatbn �EXISTlNG DESERT SANDS USD' �__ � �— „����� 100.00'6� �b 80,90p,830 S 81,597,77A PROPOSED TERRITORY TO BE TRANSFERREp 0.9096 S 696,944 REMAINING PALM SPRINGS USO 99.10% 3 76 `372 `744 S 76,3T2,744 TOTAL S 15T,9T0,518 S 157,910,518 SOURCE: DESERT SANDS ANO PALM SPRiNGS USDs 2Q00-0'J AUDIT REPORT AND DlSTR/CT STUDENT DATA FJLES Table III - 14 shows an example of the combined division of debt on each of the disrricts for the proposed territory to be transferred. Tabfe IU - !4 Summary of Proposed Dfvtsion of Liabilities Asa�as�d ValuaUon Bas�d DisMct ADA 8ased D�bt Debt Totsl D�bt EXISTING DESERT SANDS USD � S` 2,849,044 S 81,597.774 S 64,44f3,8t8� PROPOSED TERRITORY TO BE TRANSFERRED S � S, � ��-' _, i... �.�.�. ' REMAiNING PALM SPRINGS USO S 2,147.047 S 78,372,744 S 78,519,791 TOTAL 5 4,996,491 5 157,970,518 S 162,968.6Q9 SOtlkCE: DESERT SANDS AND PALM SPRINGS USDs 2004-01 AUDIT REPORT AND Dl5TR1CT ST[lOENT DATA FILES 15 � � Table III - 15 lists the example summary asset and liability distribution excluding student body � funds for each of the districts for the proposed territory to be transferred. � � TaDle III - 1S Net Fund Balance and Liabllity Divislan Afte� Reorganizat€on EXIS NG DESERT ••���•••-- Totsl Auets Tolal Debt _ Net Distribudon �� SANOS USD S i08,Q24,572 S 84.446,B18 S 23,577,T54� PROPOSHD TERRITORY TO BE TRANSFERREO S� - � � � � - � . i - REMAINING PALM SPRINGS USD S 50.168,001 S 78,519,791 S (28,351,790 TOTAL S 158,192,3T3 i 162.966,609 S �4,774,036� SOURCE: DESERT SANOS AND PALM SPRINGS USOs ?000-0J AUDlT REPORT ANQ DlSTRlCT STUDENT DATA FILES � Table III — 16 shows the net fund balance and liability summary before reorganizallon and, when compared to Table III — l 5, shaws the net change in assets and liabilities as a result of the � transfer of territory, that is curtently completely within the existing Palm Springs USD, to the Desert Sands USD. Because the Palm Springs USD has liabilities in excess of fund balances, the data indicate that the net change in division of assets and liabilities could be a loss of liability of � $233,470 for the Palm Springs USD and a gain of liabiliry of $233,474 for the Desert Sands USD as a result of the division of the above assets and liabilities. � The impact of the division of potential future revenues would he speculatian and is, therefore, not included in this analysis. It is important to recognize that the recently approved genera3 obligation bond for the Desert Sands USD is not included in this analysis because it was passed � after the close for the 2000-01 school year and would have no impact on this transfer. Furthermore, the proposed territory to be transferred is completely within the Palm Springs USD and, therefore, the assets and ]iabilities, including the recently passed general obligation bond, of � the Desert Sands USD are not being divided. Table III - 15 Net Fund Balance and Liability Summary Before Reo�ganization DisVlct Tota! Assats Total Debt EXISTIidG DESERT�SANQS�USO � S 107,664,303 3 83,74T,946 LESS STUDENT BODY FUNDS • S (125,133) EXISTING PAIM SPRINGS USD S 5d,fi33,4Q3 3 79.218.663 TOTAL S 158,192,5T3 S 162,966,608 SOI/RCE DESERT SANDS AND PALM SPRlNGS USDs 2000-01 AUDlT REPORT AND ' TO BE DNlDED BASED ON FNROL�MENT AT EACH SCNOOL Division of Persona! Property Other than Funds The personal property of the Palm Springs USD that is subject to division is the personal propert,y used for district-wide purposes and not located at a school and designated for use by that schoo! only. For example, school busses and district office personal property are used district-wide and are subject to the division of properry regulations, but desks and science lab equipment at a specific school are not used district-wide and would nat be subject to the division of property rcguIations. 16 ' � If the proposal were ultimately approved by the voters, designees of the Desert Sands and Pa1m � Springs USDs would need to agree on a division of appropriate personal property. An appraiser should be retained to assess the value of each item subject to partition. The parties couid agree to substitute cash balances or future revenue for portions of the personal properiy. Arbitration of � disputes should be resolved in accordance with EC§ 35565. Division of Bonded Indebtedness � Education Code §35575 states: � When territory is taken from one school disfict and annexed to another school district and the area transferred contains no public school property or buildings, the territory shall drop any iiability for outstanding bonded indebtedness in ihe district of which it was formerly a part and � shall automatically assume its proportionate share of'the outstanding bonded indebtedness of the district of which it becomes a part. Education Code §35576 states: (a) When temcory is taken from one district and annexed to, or included in, another district or a new district by any procedure and the area transferred contains public school buildings or properry, the district to which the territory is annexed shall take possession of the buildings and equipment on the day when the annexation becomes effective for all purposes. The territory transferred shall cease to be liable for the bonded indebtedness of the district of which it was forrnerly a part and shalt automaticalIy assume its proportionate share of the outstanding bonded indebtedness of any district of which it becomes a part. (b) The acquiring district sha11 pay the original district the greatest of the amounts detennined under provisions of paragraphs (1) or (2) or the amount determined pursuant to a method prescribed under Section 35738. (1) The proportionate share of the outstanding bonded indebtedness of the original disirict, which proporcionate share shall be in the ratio which the total assessed valuation of the transfemng temtory bears to the totai assessed valuation of the original district in the year immediateIy preceding the date on which the annexation is effective for all pvrposes. This ratio shaIl be used each year until the bonded indebtedness for which the acquiring district is liable has been repaid. (2) Ti�at portian of the outstanding bonded indebtedness of the originat district which was incurred for the acquisition or improvement of school lots or buildings, or fixtwes located therein, and situated in the territory transferred. (c) The county board of supervisors shall compute for the reorganized district an annuat tax rate for bond interest and redemplion which will inclu�ie the bond interest and redeniption on the outstanding bonded indebtedness specified in paragraph (1) or {2) of subdivision (b) or the amount determined pursuant to a method prescribed under Section 35738. 'The county board of supervisors shall also compute tax rates for the annual charge and use charge prescribed by former Sections 1822.2 and 1825 as they read on July 1, 1970 when such charges were 17 � � established prior to November 23, l 970. All such tax rates shall be levied in excess of any other ad valarem properry tax authorized or required by law and shall not be inciuded in the computation of the limitation specified in subdivision (a) of Section 1 of Article XIII A of the California Canstitution. � Both the Desert Sands and Palm Springs USDs have recently passed general obiigation bond measures. Currently the Palm Springs USD owns no real property within the proposed territory � to be transferred and under these circumstances EC §35575 would apply. If the Palm Springs USD were to acquire real property for the purposes of constructing a school within the proposed territory to be transferred, the bonded indebtedness of the Pa1m Springs USD would be divided � based on EC §35576 after the proposed reorganization. � � � I8 EC §35753(a)(4): The reorganization of the districts will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation. General Finding The study finds that data contained in this section indicate that this condition would be subsiantially met. Siandard of Review In Section l SS73{a)(4}, Title 5, Caiifomia Code of Reeulations, the State Boazd of Education set forth five factors to be considered in determining whether reorganization will promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation: (A) The current number and percentage of pupils in each racial and ethnic group in the affected districts and schools in the affected districts, compared with the number and percentage of pupils in each racial and ethnic group in the affected districts anci schools in the affected districts if the proposal or petition were approved. (B) The trends and rates of present and possible future growth or change in the total population in the districts affected, in each racial and ethnic group within the total district, and in each school of the affected districts. (C) The school board policies regarding methods of preventing racial and ethnic segregation in the affected districts and the effect of the proposal or petition on any des�gregation plan or program of the affected districts, whether voluntary or court ordered, designed to prevent or alleviate racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation. (D) The effect of factors such as distance between schools and attendance centers, terrain, geographic features that may involve safety hazards to pupils, capacity of schools, and related conditions or circumstances that may have an effect on the feasibility of integration of the affected schools. (E) The effect of the proposal on the duty of the goveming board of each of the affected districts to take steps, insofar as reasonably feasible, to alleviate segregation of minoriry pupiis in schools regardless of its cause. Findings/Gonclusions Tables IV — 1 and 2 show the racial ethnic profiies and trends for the Desert Sands and Palm Springs USDs. Both districts have had a trend of increasing minoriry student populations. Table 1V — 3 shows the impact of the proposed territory to be transferred an each of the disficts and the estimated percent change in racial and ethnic student populations before and afler the 19 PROPOSED TERRITORY TRANSFER ANALYSIS rebie ry - � ETHNIC PROFILE OF TNE DESERT SANDS USD YEAR 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 '1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 YEAR 1964 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 t994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Zoo� AMERICAN 1NDIAN 135 '108 89 iO4 95 i11 110 225 135 128 117 110 111 �os 96 94 86 101 AMERICAN tNDIAN � 1.24% 0.95 % 0.74% 0.80% 0.67% 0.739�0 0.69% 1.34% 0.78% 0.71 % 0.639Yo 0.569/0 0.549�0 0.50% 0.44 % 0.41 °/a Q.37% 0.419'0 ASIAN 110 110 113 124 149 173 184 191 z2s 222 231 268 250 267 278 272 323 344 PACIFIC lSLANDER 3 15 27 1 4 3 5 7 i2 25 69 17 23 31 42 36 32 AFRICAN FILIPINO HiSPANIC AMERICAN 18 28 35 42 37 39 44 52 71 86 82 91 92 86 95 109 96 i09 5,607 6,018 6,4Q1 6,861 7,591 8,373 8,903 9,170 9,702 10,280 10,816 11,448 12,1 Q9 i 2,676 13,462 14,203 14,886 15,690 400 408 420 426 418 429 426 433 433 403 40�3 442 485 521 511 498 494 519 WHITE 4,614 4,669 5,019 5,419 5,806 6,112 6,388 6,702 6,765 6,795 6,960 7,23d 7,397 7,433 7,490 7,597 7,579 7,787 MULTI TOTAL 10,884 11, 344 12,Q92 13,003 14,097 15,241 16,058 16,778 17,338 i 7,926 18,635 19,662 20,461 21,112 74 22,037 0 22,815 0 23,500 0 24,582 PERCENT ETHNIC PROFILE OF THE DESERT SANOS USD PAClFIC ASIAN ISLANUER � .�i �o �.��o 0.97% Q.03% d.93% 0.12�Yo 0.95% 0.219�0 1.�% 0.0196 1,14% 4.03°� 1.15% O.OZ9'o 9.14% 0.03% 1.30% 0.049�0 1.249'0 0.079/0 1.24% 0.13% 1.36% 0.35% 1.22% 0.08% 1.26% 0.119'0 i .269'0 0.14 % 1.19°10 0.18S�o 1.37°io 0.15% 1 40°�0 4. i 39'0 FILIPINO O.i7% 0.25% 0.29% 0.32% 0.26% 0.26% Q.27°Yo 0.3 i °Yo 0.41 % 0.48°/a 0.44 % 0.46°/a 0.45°!0 0.419/0 0.43% 0.48% o.a� �a o.aa�ia HISPANIC 51.52�'0 53.05% 52.94°Yo 52.76% 53.85% 54.94% 55.44°/, 54.65°k 55.9696 57.35% 58.049/0 58.229'0 59.18% 60.04 % 61.09% 62.25 % 63.34% 63.83% AFRICAN AMERICAN 3.68 °l�o 3.60 % 3.479�0 3.28% 2.979�0 2.81'3�0 2.65% 2.589�0 2.509�0 225% 2.179�0 2.25°/a 2.37% 2.479'0 2.32% 2.18°Yo �.10°/a 2.11 % WHITE MULTI TOTAL 42.39% 10Q.00% 41.1fi% 100.00% 41.51 % 100.00°l�0 41.67% 100.00% 41.19% 100.00% 40.109�0 100.00% 39.78% 100.00% 39.95°/a 100.00% 39.02°Yo 100.00% 37.91 % 100.00% 37.35% 100.003'0 36.79°/a 100.00% 36.159b 100.00% 35.21 % 100.00 °Yo 33.99% 0.34% 100.00% 33.3Q% 0.00% 1 Q0.00°Yo 32.25% a.00�a � oo.00�io 31.68% 0.00% 100.00% SOURCE: CBEOS UNiT, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Table IV - 1 PROPOSED TERRITORY TRANSFER ANALYSIS Table IV - 2 ETHNiC PROFILE OF THE PALM SPRINGS USD AMERICAN PACIFIC AFRICAN YEAR INDIAN ASIAN 1SLANDER FIUPINQ HISPANIC AMERICAN 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1969 '! 990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 ZOOQ 2001 YEAR 1984 1985 1986 1587 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1983 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 'f 999 2000 2001 130 163 153 146 120 137 134 132 139 124 166 195 205 204 214 i97 200 192 137 147 18Q 166 187 209 230 246 238 223 Z�z 2� 2'10 21fi 290 221 213 192 20 30 29 15 23 38 45 47 3fi 31 23 22 28 30 34 42 41 211 263 262 280 292 318 345 377 369 378 410 401 413 436 452 491 487 506 2,338 545 �,eas soo 3,193 642 3,625 726 4,396 778 5,157 823 5,894 912 6,702 948 7,110 965 7,533 1,031 s,oas sas 8, 799 i ,079 9,456 1,072 9,982 1,109 10,605 1,161 11,354 1,161 12,150 1,199 13,080 1,12 i WHITE MUL.TI TOTAL 5,287 8,648 5,358 9,357 5,765 10,225 6,214 i1,486 6,511 12,309 6,635 13,302 6,874 14,427 7,173 15,623 7,34�3 16,212 7,104 16,429 s,ses �s,743 6,886 17,589 6,759 18,129 6,686 18,661 6,644 42 19,358 6,714 44 20,216 6,524 32 20,847 6,368 32 21,532 PERCENT ETHNIC PROFILE OF THE PA�M SPRINGS USD AMERlCAN PACIFIC INDIAN ASIAN ISLANpER FILlPINO 1.50% 1.58% �O.QO% 2.4496 1.74°k 1.5796 0.2196 2.81 % 1.50% 1.76% 0.2996 2.56% 1.31 °10 i .48% 0.26°l0 2.5096 0.97% 1.6096 0.1296 2.3T°lo 1.0396 1.57°/a 0.1796 2.39% 0.93% 1.S990 0.26% 2.39% 0.84% 1.57% 0.29% 2.41°k Q.86% 1.47% 029°/a 2.28°k 0.75% 1.36% 0.22% 2.30% 0.99% 1.27°/a 0.1996 2.45% �.19 96 1.17°k 0.1396 2.2896 1.1396 1.16% 4.1296 2.2896 1.09% 1.16% 0.15% 2.3�1% 1.11% 1.0896 0.1596 2.33% 0.9796 i.0996 0.17% 2.43°% 0.96i6 1.02°% 0.2096 2.34% 0.89% 0.89% 0.19% 2.35% AFRICAN HISPANlC AMERlCAN 27.04% - -fi.3096 29.99% 6.4196 37.2396 6.28% 32.41 °k 6.49% 35.7196 6.32% 38.77% 6.1996 40.85°l�0 6.32% 42.90% 6.0796 43.86% 5.95`Yo 45.85°/a 8.28% 48A796 5.919'0 50.039� 6.13% 52.16°l0 5.919�0 53.49% 5.94% 54.78% 6.009�0 56.16% 5.749� 58.28% 5.75°k 60.75% 5.21 % WHITE MULTI 70TAt 61.1496 100.00% 57.2696 100.00% 56.3896 100.00`Yo 55.55% 104.0�°k 52.9096 100.OQ% 49.8896 100.0096 47.65% 100.00% 45.9196 100.0096 45.30% 100.00% 43.24% 100.00% 41.13% 100.0096 39.1596 100.00°/a 37.2496 100.0096 35.83% 100.00% 34.3296 0.22°Yo 100.00% 33.2196 a.2296 100.00°l0 31.29°% 0.1596 100.00% 29.57°,b Q.15°Yo 100.00% SOURCE: CBEDS UNIT, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Table IV - 2 TABLEIV-3 COMPARATIVE ETHNIC ANALYSfS BEFORE AND AFTER TRANSFER CURRENT ETHNIC PROFi�ES ETHNIC CATEGORY AMERICAN INDIAN AS IAN PACIFIC ISLANOER FILlPINO HISPANIC AFRICAN AMERICAN WHITE MULTI TOTAL DESERT SANDS PERCENT DESERT PALM SPRINGS USD BEFORE SANDS USD BEFORE USD BEFORE TRANSFER TRANSFER TRANSFER 86 0.38% 200 323 1.37qa 213 3fi 0.159/0 42 96 0.41 °/a 487 14,88fi 63.34°Yo 12,150 494 2.10% 1,199 7,579 32.2596 6,524 0 0.00% 32 23,50� 100.00% 20,8�17 STUDENTS PROPOSED FOR TRANSFER PERCENT PALM SPRINGS U5D BEFORE PERCENT TRANSFER OIFFERENT Q.9696 0.589'0 1.02% -0.3596 0.20'S'o O.OS�Yo 2.349'0 1.93�Yo 58.2896 -5.06% 5.7596 3.659'0 31.3096 -0.969'0 0.159�0 0.159'0 100.0096 0.009'0 DESERT SANDS PERCENT DESER'i PA4M SPRINGS PERCENT PALM USO STUDENTS SAND5 USD USD SiUDENTS SPRINGS USD TO BE STUDENTS TO BE TO BE STUOENTS T� BE PERCEN7 ETHNIC CATEGORY TRANSFERREO TRANSFERREO TRANSFERRED TRANSFERRED QIFFEREPIT AMERICAN INpiAN 0� 0.00% 0 Asi,�,n� o o.00�� o PACIFIC ISLANDER 0 0.00°Ya 0 Flll PINO 0 0.00% 0 HISPANIC 0 0.00% fi AFRICAN AMERICAN 0 0.009'0 0 WHITE 0 0.00% 12 MULT! 0 O.OU% 0 TOiAL 0 0.00% 18 SOURCE: DESERT SAND5 AND PALM SPR/NG5 USOS STUDENT DATA FfLES AND CDE AFTER PROPOSED TERRI70RY TRANSFER 0.�% a.00�o 0.009'0 0.009'0 33.339'0 0.00'Yo 6fi.6796 0.0096 100.0096 a.oax o.00�o 0.00% 0.00°Yo 33.339'a O.OU96 66.679'0 0.00% 100.0096 DESER7 SANDS PERCENT DESER7 PALM SPRINGS PERCEM' PA�M USO AFTER SANDS USD AFTER USU AFTER SPRINGS USD PERCENT ETHNtC CATEGORY TRANSFER iRANSFER TRANSFER AFTER TRANSFER OIFFERENT AMERICAN INDIAN � 86 0.37°� 200 ASIAN 323 1.37% 213 PACIFiC ISLAfVDER 36 Q.159�0 42 FILIPlNO 9fi 0.41 % 487 HISPANIC 14,892 63.32% 12,144 AFRICAN AMERICAN 494 2.'10°/a 1,i99 WHlI'E 7,5@9 32.28% 6,512 MUl.TI 0 0.0096 32 TOTAL 23,518 i00.0096 20,829 SOURCE: DESFRT SANDS AND PALM SPRlNGS USOS STUDENT DATA F1LES AND CDE 0.9896 0.5996 1.02% -0.35% Q.20% 0.05°l�0 2.349'0 1.93% 58.309'0 -5.02°Yo 5.769b 3.66% 31.26% -1.019�0 0.15% 0.159'e 100.00% 0.00% �.-�� �� �a+ ��� !� � � � �� �� � SCHOOL AMELIA EARHART ELMENTARY � � � AM1SiAD HIGH (CONT.� DISTRICT GENERAL ALTERNATNE EISENHOWER (OWIGHTj ELEMENTARY FORO (GERAlO R.) ELEMEN7ARY HOqVER(HERBERT)ELCMENTARY INDIO HIGH INDIO MIDDLE JACKSON(ANDREW)ELEMEMTARY JAMES EARL CARTER ELEMEN7ARY JEFFERSON {fHOMASj MIpDIE JOHN ADAMS ELEMENTARY JOHN GLENtV MIDDI.E JOHNSON {LYNDON B.) ELEMENTARY KENt3�DY {JOtiN F.) ELEMENTARY LA �UINTA HIG1i LA dUINTA MIDOLE LItJCOW {ABRAHAMj ELEMENTARY MADISON (.1AMES� ELEMENTARY MONROE (.fAMES} E1.EMENTARY PALM aESERT HIGH PALM DESERT M1DDlE RQOSEVELT (TFiEODOREj ELEMENTARY TRUMAN (HARRY SJ ELEMENTARY VAN BUREN (MARTIN) ELEMENTARY WASHINCTON (GEORGE} CHAR7ER WILSON (WOOQROW) MtODLE PROJqMITY TO 7RANSFER AREA 3.22 MILES 4,94 MfLES A.0 MiLES TASLEIV-4 DESERT SANDS USD Z001 ETHNIC PROFILE AMERICAN YEAR INDIAN „, .. 2001. . 6 2U01 3 zoo� ti 2001 1 2061 1 2Q01 6 2001 6 2001 1 2001 0 2001 3 2001 3 2001 1 2001 3 2001 3 20Q! 5 2001 8 2001 6 2001 3 20Q1 0 2001 2 2001 11 2001 9 2001 1 2001 2 2001 1 200� s 2001 3 AStAN 12 — - 4 0 7 8 8 11 12 0 21 3 3 18 1 e 36 8 13 2Q 9 68 IO 5 7 U �e 0 PACIFIC 1SLANDER FlLIPINO .,� .,. .3 1 1 o s 4 4 0 3 0 1 � a 2 a 4 t 8 1 0 2 0 2 4 10 1 0 2 3 2 12 5 4 1 9 2 5 0 2 1 8 1 2 0 3 1 6 1 2 z s 0 1 HISPANIC �� 239 4i2 srs 192 613 177 z�ss 936 615 132 687 629 446 684 73B 1d59 483 486 714 387 401 336 �33 596 610 �55 497 AFRiCAN AMERICAN 24 13 6 5 19 3 47 �a 8 8 25 19 28 17 25 70 2T 20 12 18 21 26 ti 27 B 9 5 WHITE � 379 es 27 443 i9 182 t47 �as 18 d31 16 196 Si2 79 76 sse 350 193 132 309 1328 761 19 d58 11 501 33 MU�Tt TOTAL � 664 519 616 656 661 377 2381 >> » 642 596 736 840 1021 785 857 z�as 883 725 865 727 1839 1175 r72 1 Q97 633 700 559 PERCENT VY}IITE 57.08% 16.389'i 4.389'a 67.53°,G 2.879'e 48.28°Y. 6.17°/. 12,24% 2.80°% 72.32Y. 2.17% 22.14°1e 50.159: � o.os�. 8.874'. 44.66% 39,649G 26.62% 1 Q.92°/. 42.50°/. 72.10X 64.77X 2.489G 41.759'. 1.749L 71, 579�e s.�z�o SOURCE: CBEQS UNfT, CAIIFOFiNIA D�PARTMENT OF EOUCATlOt�f �-� ��. �..�r �s �w w �� SChtOOL AGUA CALIENTE ELEMENTARY � BUBBLING WELLS ELEMENTARY CAHUILLA ELEMEN7ARY CATHEORAI C{TY ELEMEPtTARY CATFiEORAL CITY HIGH CtELO VISTA EI.EMENTARY COFFMAN (NELLIE N.� MIOdLE CQRSINI (JULIUS) ELEMENTARY CREE (RAYMOND) MIODIE DESERT FlOT SPRINGS IifGH OESERT 5F'RItdGS MIDOIE FINICNY {KATNERINE) EtEMENTARY LANDAU EtEMEh1TARY LAS BRISAS FIIGH (CONT.) LINOLEY (OELLA S.} EIEMENTARY MOUNT SAN JACINTO HIGH (CONT.) PALM SPRINGS HIGN RAMON ACAOEMY RANCMO MIFiAGE ELEMENTARY SUNNY SANDS ELEMENTARY TWO BUNCH PALMS ELEMENTARY V1SiA DEl MONTE ELEMEN7ARY WEN2lAF� (EOWARD l.) ELEMEN7ARY WORKMAN (JAMES) MIOOIE PROXIM{TY TO TRANSFER AREA 5.76 M1LES 5.24 MILES 5.52 MILES TABLEIV•5 PALM SPRINGS USd 2001 E7HN1C PROF1lE AMERICAN YEAR INOIAN ..-- --..._..-- 2001 6 20Q1 6 2001 12 2001 2 2001 18 2001 4 2001 T 20U1 7 2001 23 2001 6 20Q1 10 2001 8 2001 13 2001 0 2001 0 2001 2 2001 22 2001 4 2001 3 2001 7 2001 4 zoo� e 2001 8 2001 12 PACIFIC ASIAN ISLAtJDER 5, — ,,, .Q ..... 1 0 9 0 1 1 36 4 6 2 7 0 3 1 10 0 10 2 5 1 22 4 12 7 0 0 6 6 0 0 22 3 0 0 3 2 16 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 �7 s FIUPINO _... ,13 2 12 7 71 65 13 9 37 3 8 13 29 0 3 5 90 2 3 48 5 19 4 45 HISPANIC 655 519 333 856 �485 417 B08 392 555 ssa 776 216 569 10 511 227 6fi9 172 441 659 507 503 381 75t AFRtCAN AMERICAN 31 �-- 3Q 64 31 sa 34 36 57 95 63 74 56 46 0 9 26 103 �s 32 26 45 47 64 35 VYHiTE ,,_ 31 136 !85 110 �sa 163 287 967 A22 451 A14 292 375 9 ib9 95 796 40 183 300 1A0 141 280 437 MUL?i TO7AL 0 0 0 0 s 5 0 1 0 0 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 741 ssa 615 1Q08 2�e� 696 1138 63T 1142 1203 13�5 &15 1051 19 697 355 1707 237 667 1058 T01 720 739 t306 PERCENT W HIT E _ 4.1 B°Ie 19.609'0 30.08% 10.9194 30.74•�G Z3.R2q. 23.4&'/. 26.22'Ye 36.954b 37.agy. 3t.72°/. 47.489'. 35.68�. A7.379'. 24.107b 26.76'Ye 46.T5'Yo 16.88% 27.449'. 28.389'. 19.97°/. 19.589G 37.89°!. 33.A8°/. SOURCE: CBEDS UNIT, CAIIfORNfA OEPARTMENT OF EDUCATI�tJ proposed reorganization asing the 2�01-02 student population of each district. Tables I V- 4 and 5 show the schools closest to the proposed territory to be transferred and the racial and ethnic student populations of each school. Table IV - 3 indicates that the difference between the percent non-minority (White) student enrollment of the Desert Sands USD less the Palm Springs USD is currently -0.96 percent. If the transfer were to become effective, the difference in percent non-minority student enrollment between the Desert Sands USD less the Palm Springs USD would increase to -.99 percent. The transfer is estimated to cause a 0.03 percent change in the overall non-minority population. Similarly, the diti'erence in percent minority student population would also be 0.03 percent. Further examination of district materials indicate that the existing policies of each district and their abiIity to take steps, insofar as reasonably feasible, to alleviate segregation of minority pupils in schooIs regardless of its cause wouId not be impaired by the proposed reorganization. Tables IV - 4 and S show the ethnic profiles for the Palm Springs and Desert Sands USDs. The mileage from the approximate center of the proposed territory to be transferred to the closest elementary, middle and high school in each district is noted. Both districts have similar district- wide ethnic enrollments. They both permit individual schools within their districts to operate on either an attendance area and/or choice basis, resulting in non-uniform minority student enrollment at various schoois. However, the proposed reorganization would have little effect on either district's current racial and ethnic profile. 20 �EC §35753(a)(5): The proposed reorganization will not result in any � substantial increase in costs to the state. r� General Finding The study finds that data contained in this section indicate that this condition would be substantially met. Standard of Review Education Code sections 35735 through 35735.2 mandates a method of computing revenue lirnits without regard to this criterion. Although the estimated revenue limit is provided in this section, only potential costs to the state other than those mandated by sections 35735 through 35735.2 are considered in analyzing a proposal for compliance with this criterion. Findings/Conclusions The transfer of approximately 200 residential tmits and 18 public schoal students would have little impact on siate costs for districts with enrollments over 20,000 students. State costs for i'uture students that would reside in the estimated 5,800 planned residential units within the proposed territory to be transferred would be funded at the appropriate levels applicable to the governing district. The Palm Springs USD has asserted that approva} of this petition could cause other jurisdictions or petitioners to file future petitions that could potentially increase state costs. This study found that the school district organization process is itself not a factor to be considered in determining the outcome of this condition. 21 EC §35753(a)(6): The proposed reorganization will not significantly disrupt the educationa! programs in the proposed districts and districts affected by the proposed reorganization and will continue to promote sound education performance in those districts. General Finding The study finds that data contained in this section indicate that this condition would be substantiatly met, Standard of Review The proposal or petition shall not significantly adversely affect the educational programs of districts affecied by the proposal or petition, and the Califomia Department of Education shali describe the district-wide programs, and the school site programs, in schools not a part of the proposal or petition that will be adversely affected by the proposal or petition. (Section l 8573(a)(5}, Title 5, California Code of Reeulationsl Findings Existing programs within the approximately 21,500 student Palm Springs U5D would not be significantly impacted by the transfer of 18 students within the petition area to the Desert Sands USD. Future programs to accommodate the future students that would live in the estimated 5,800 additional dwe]ling units that are currently planned for the petition area could be impacted. This report, however, is focused on the existing students and programs. Therefore, the transfer of approximately I 8 students is not forecast to significantly disrupt the educational programs in either the Desert Sands or Palm Springs USDs and each district would likely continue to promote its currently sound education performance in each district. The Palm Springs USD has asserted that delays in providing facilities to serve the propased territory to be transferred cou3d significantly disrupt educational programs. This study will treat facilities issues in Condition 7. The Paim Springs USD has made significant strides in planning for the two schools to serve this area. Should the petition be approved, the Desert Sands USD and Palm Springs USD staff persons would need to cooperate to ensure that the distuption in planning for schools to serve this area would be minimized. 'I�he Desert Sands USD has stated that it would begin planning new schooi facilitics to serve the azea as soon as this matter is decided and the City of Palm Desert approves and landowners commence developmcnt within the proposed territory to be transferred. Therefore, if the district stafis cooperate should the petition become approved and effective, the delays stated by the Palm Springs USD would likely be minimized. 22 EC §35753(a�{7): The proposed reorganization wiil not result in a significant increase in school housing costs. General Finding The study ftnds that data contained in this section indicate that this condition would not be substantial}y met. F indings/Concl usions This condition examined the change in cost of schooi facilities as a result of the proposed territory transfer. 'The costs of future school faciIities has been estimated for the Desert Sands USD and the Palm Springs USD in each of their 2002 residential developer fee justification reports. These reports forecast the number of futwe residential units for each district, the number of students expected to enroll in each district's schools that would live in these residential units, and the cost of land and schooi facilities to construct schools to accommodate these future students who would be expected to enroll in each district's schools. Table VI1— 1 shows the summary data for the Desert Sands and the Palm Springs USDs. 7'able VIl — 1 indicates that the costs to house students would increase from a combined cost of over $660 miiiion to a combined cost of over $672 million or $11,546,872 as a direct result of ihe proposed territory transfer in which 6,O14 estimated future residentia! units would move from the Palm Springs USD to the Desert Sands USD. TABLE Vlt -1 SCNOOL HOUSING COSTS BEFORE RHORGANIZATION Oes�rt Sands Palm Springs CATEGORY USD USD TOTAL FU?URE RESIDEN7IAl. U ��� � � � � � � �� 0 NITS 29,840 39.42 69,260 FU7URE STUDBN?'S 13,606 1B,407 32,013 ESTIMATED COST OF SCHOOLS S 317,340,3T7 S 343,534,756 S 660,875,133 COST PER UNIT S 10,634.73 3 8,714.73 19,349 COST PER STUdENT S 23,323.56 S 18,663.2T 41,987 P07ENTlAI. UNITS 7Q 8E TRANSFERRED 6,014 SCHOO� HOUSING COSTS AFTER REORGANIlATION Desert Sands Palm Sprinps CATEGORY USD USD TOTAL. FUTUFIE RESIDENTlAL UNITS � ���•�� �— 35,854 33,406 ��� �� � 89,260 FUTURE S7UOENTS 16,34B t5,599 31,947 ESTIMATED COST OF SCHOOLS S 381,29T,650 S 291,124,355 S 672,422,005 C057 PER UNI7 S 1Q,634.T3 S 8.714.73 t9,349 COST PER STUDENT S 23,323.56 S 18,663.27 41,987 NE7 ESTIMA7ED INCREASE IN SCHOOL HOUSING CaSTS S 11,546,872 SOURCE: PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT SANDS USDs RESIAENTIAI. DE1/ELpPMENT SCHOOL FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDIES 23 The Palm Springs USD states that existing schools throughout the eastern portion of the district including the two future schools within the proposed territory to be transferred are part of a balanced design for school facilities. The district states that students from the estimated 6,014 residentiai units that are planned for the proposed territory to be transferred will balance its school facilities construction program within the eastern portion of the district, permitting the adopted disfict standartis to be used to control increases in school housing costs. Removing the schoois within the proposed territory to be transferred could cause an imbalance, ihereby forcing the district to construct schoois for the eastern portion of the district outside the approved district standards, and as a result, school l�ousing costs could increase. The developer fee justification study estimates that over the twenty-year geriod the district would need a iotal of 13 additional elementary schools, 4 additional middle schools, and 3 additional high schools as a result of the cnmulative district-wide development. The 6,014 units within the proposed territory to be transferred comprise l 5.25 perce�t of the Palm Springs USD's forecast residential development. Should the Counry Committee vate to approve the petition, and the transfer became effective, the Palm Springs USD could take appropriate planning measures to adjust the location, size and service area of the other 12 elementary schools and two high schools to accommodate the loss of the students from the 6,014 residential units, one elementary-middle school, and one high school. The costs to adjust both the Desert Sands and Paim Springs USD Facilities Master Plans would be costs that would be incarred if the petition were approved and became effective. 'I'izese planning costs are not to be confused with school housing costs. Furthermore, eaeh district's school-naming practice fosters a city-based communiry identity. Failure to recogni2e this in pianning and operaiing school facilities service areas has caused significant discord wichin those commun�ties that border the common boundary between the Desert Sands and the Palm Springs USDs. Although an$11,546,872 increase in school housing costs is only a 1.75 percent increase in combined costs for both the Desert Sands and Palm Springs USDs, revenue to offset these costs was considered in evaluating this condition and was furti�er analyzed in Condition 9. However, this study considered that the potential loss of revenue from redevelopment agency funds from the Ciry of Palm Desert (see Condition 9) coupled with the estimated $11,546,872 increase in school housing costs are sufficient reasons to finding that this condition be deemed not substantially met. 24 EC §35753(a}(8): The proposed reorganization is not primariiy designed to result in a significant increase in property values causing financial advantage to property owners because territory was transferred from one schoo I district to an adjoining district. General Finding 'The study finds that data contained in this section indicate that this condition would be substantially met. FindingslConclusions Over the past decade, the proposed transfer of this territory has come before tbe counry committee on at least two separaEe occasions. Additionally, continued action to adjust the territorial boundary between the Desert Sands and Palm Springs USDs has occwred since 1981. As stated in the analysis of Condition 2, residents in both districts appear to identify with the local govemment, usually the city government that serves them. This is evident in the naming conventions that the Pa1m Springs USD used for some of its schools, for example Cathedral City High School, Desert Hot Springs High School, and Rancho Mirage Elementary School. Similarly, Desert Sands named some of its schools after local azeas: Indio High School, Indio Middle School, La Quinta High Schoo[, La Quinta Middle School, Palm Desert High School, and Palm Deseri Middle School. Palm Desert residents with school—age children, pay City of Palm Desert taxes and are subjeci to the decisions of the Ciry af Palm Desert. Residents in Palm Desert identify with Palm Desert and generally want their children to attend Palm Desert Schools. When notified by Palm Springs USD that students in ihis territory reside in attendance areas of schools in Cathedral City and Thousand Palms, some parents decided to pursue other options, such as inter-district transfers and/or private schools. These attendance decisions, coupled with the history of proposed and approved territory transfers, lead to the conclusion that the resolution of the City of Palm Desert requesting consideration of a transfcr of the subject territory was not primarily desigr�ad to result in a significant increase in property values causing financial advantage to property owners. Examination of the property values as listed for the April 2002 Trends report published by the Califvrnia Association of Realtors � for ihose cities listed and/or sampled indicate ti�at on the average, for cities listed in the report, property ��alues within the Desert Sands and Palm Springs USD are relatively equal. Table Vlll — I displays the avrrage April 2402 sales price data for each city in each district and an unweighted average for each district. There is no apparent gain in property values by moving property from the Palm Springs USD to the Desert Sands USD or vice-versa. 25 y � � l Tahle VIII - 1 City Average Sa]es Price Average Sales Price . Desert Sands USD Palm SprinAs USD Cathedral Ciry 5155,500 Coachella �` $134,000 Desert Hot Springs lndio * $ l 3Q,000 Palm Desert $225,000 � Palm Springs � � Rancho Mira$e �262,000 � Average $186,750 I Source: Califbrnia Association of Realtors � * part of same sample $8U,500 $225,000 $ i 72,500 $262,(}00 $179,I00 26 EC §35753(a)(9): The proposed reorganization will not cause a substantial negative effec! on the fiscal management or fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization. Generat Finding The study finds that data contained in this section indicate that this condition would not be substantially met. Staff FindingslConctusions Education Code Section 35753 (a) (9) states that the proposed reorganization may not cause a substantial negative effect on the fiscal management or fiscal status of the praposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization. The proposed reorganization has two major fiscal components for which negative fiscal consequences were analyzed: impacts on existing operational and capital funds; and, estimated impacts on fuhue operating and capital funds. lmpacts on Existing Funds The transfer of 18 students from the Palm Springs to the Desert Sands USD wouId not cause a substantial recalculation of the Desert Sands Revenue Lirnit and it would not cause more than a percent change in the fiscal condition of either district. Should the transfcr occw 18 students times the per-pupil revenue Iimit would be subtracted from the Palm Springs annual Revenue Limit funds and 18 students times the per-pupil revenue limit would be added to the Desert Sands annual Revenue Limit funds. Since both districts were fbrecast to grow by more than 18 students annually, operating fimds of both the Desert Sands USD and the Palm Springs USD would have insignificant change as a result of the proposed reorganization. The impact on each district's capital revenues and expenditures would also be minor. Currently 48 public school students reside within the approximately 200 residential units within the proposed territory to be transferred. Of these 48 public school students, 30 already attend schools within the Desert Sands USD. Transferring an additional 18 students to the 24,582 student Desert Sands USD wonld be a 0.45 percent increase in enrollment, an amount considered insignificant by this study. Since these students are distributed throughout the K-l2 grade levels, no additional classroom facilities would be needed by the Desert Sands USD to accommodate them. Additionally, annual growth forecast for the Palm Springs USD would replace these students witliin a few months. Therefore, this study finds that the proposed reorganization wouid not cause a substai�tial negative effect on the eaistin¢ fiscal management or fiscal status of either the Desert Sands or Palm Springs USD. �� Estimated Impacts on Future Funds Each district has Revenue Limit funds that would apply to futwe students to finance operating costs for each district's schoots and district-wide functions. As the current 18 students that would transfer from the Patm Springs USD to the Desert Sands USD grow when additional residcntial units are constructed and families with children occupy ihese units, estimated future increases in Revenue Limit funds based on per-pupil growth would be sufficient to offset estimated aperating costs. Therefore, there would be no impact on futwe operating funds as a result of the proposed reorganization. Each district has a capital faciiities component that consists of a combination of developer fee revenues, state School Faciiities Program revenues, general obligation bond funds, and redeveIopment agency revenue. Developer fee revenues are expected to be limited to the GC §65995 statutory limit, currentiy set at $2. I4 per square foot of habitable space for residential development. Cammerciat/Induscrial developer fees are also levied by each district at the maximum statutory rate of $0.34 per square foot of commercial/industrial d�velopment. The developer fees to be levied by ihe Palm Sptings USD on the future 5,814 residential ur�its and the estimated 6,406,841 square feet of commerciaVindustrial constretction would be similaz, regardless of whether the proposed territory to be transferred remained in the Palm Springs USD or was transferred to the Desert Sands USD. Each disfict has made application to the Office of Aublic School Construction (OPSC) for 3chool Facilities Program matching funds to purchase ]and and construct its current and future schools. School Facilities Program funds are established by the State Allocation Board and consist of per-pupil grants plus a 50 percent matching share of land and site improvement costs. The per-pupil grants are uniform throughout the state. Land acquisition and site improvemcnt matching funds are based on costs for each project and are estimated to be similar for both the Desert Sands and Palm Springs USDs. Therefore, state School Facilities Program revenues are expected to be similar, regardless of whether the proposed territory to be transferred remained in the Patm Springs USD or was transferred to the Desert Sands USD. Each district has passed a voter-approved general obligation bond to finance capital improvements to existing schools and to acquire land and construct new school facilities. 'The tax-rate for Iandowners within each district depends on the amount of bonds issued and the assessed valuation of the real property within each dish-ict. Both of these variables change annually and cause the tax rate to fluctuate. Each district made statements in its ballot arguments to voters regarding what it would consider the maximum tax-rate that would be levied before each bond was approved. Exceeding the stated maximum tax-rate is permissible, but district governing boards would be cautioned that negative political consequences couid result from ignoring prior promises to voters. It should be noted that the maximum tax-rate promised to Palm Springs USD voters was less that the maximum tax-rate promised te Desert Sands USD voters. The Palm Springs USD has staled Ihal genera] obligdtiun buncl fi.encls from its current prugrrun have been designated to partially ofiset ihe costs o#'schoo! faciiities for the proposed transfer area residents and some residents residing in the eastern portion of the district outside the proposed transfer area. The Desert Sands USD has stated that na funds have been designated for land acquisition and school facilities construction for schools within the proposed territory to be 28 transferred as part of its current general obligation bond program. The Desert Sands U5D wauld need to either ask its voters for additional genera] obligation bond authorization or find other capital facilities revenue to offset additional land acquisition and school facilities consttuction costs that conld have been covered by the PaIm Springs USD general obligation bond program. If the proposed reorganization were to become effective, it is estimated that 4.9 percent of the remaining Palm Springs USD authorization of approximately $35,000,000 or $315,0{)0 would accrue to the Desert Sands USD. However, the estimated funds needed fram general obligation bonds could exceed $30,000,000 to offset land acquisition and school facilities consquction costs. The $3l 5,000 would be less than 1 percent of the revenue needed to affset these costs. Because these general obligation bond revenues to offset a portion of the land acquisition and school facilities costs for the Desert Sands USD are not present and not secured without future voter general obligation bond authorization, the Desert Sands USD could have a significant negative impact to its capital facilities program as a result of the proposed tetritory transfer. A portion of the proposed territory to be transferred contains Redevelopment Area #2 (RDA} for which an agreement between the Palm Springs USD and the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency was established in 1988. The Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency is a political subdivision of ihe Ciry of Palm Desert. The agreement provides the Paim Springs USD with a defined and substantial portion of the tax increment coIlected annually by the RDA. Currently, annual revenues are about $ I 1,000. The PaIm Springs USD has estimat�d that the potential cumulative current and future RDA revenues could exceed 538,000,000. The City of Palm Desert has estimated that the potential cumulative current and futwe RDA revenues could exceed $41,000,000. The Palm Springs USD has specificaIly designated that funds collected from the RDA wouid be used to fund a portian of the two schools planned far the proposed territory to be transferred, which is covered in part by the RDA. ?he Palm Springs USD has stated that the land acquisition and facilities consfiaction costs for the two schools within the proposed territory to be transferr�d couid be in excess of $70,000,000. Its estimate of $38,000,400 of future RDA funds would be a significant portion of the revenue to ofTset these land acquisition and facilities construction costs. The RDA agreement, however, contains no provision to transfer the revenue due the Palm Springs USD to the Desert Sands USD shouid the transfer became effective. Legal counsel for the Desert Sands USD has stated that there would be no mechanism, other than negoriating with the City of Palm Desert and the RDA to obtain any funds for future land acquisition and/or school facilities construction. Without a legally sufficient guarantee for transfer of RDA revenues from the Palm Springs USD tv the Desert Sanrls USD shoeild the proposed reorganization occur, the Desert Sands USD could have a significant negative impact to its capital facilities program as a resuit of the proposed territory transfer. In summary, current and future operating revenues are estimated to be sufficient regardless of �vhether the progosed territory ta be transferred remains in the Palm Springs USD or is transferred to the Desert Sands USD. Addi[ionally, current capital program funds ���ouid be sufficient to permit either district to accommodate the t 8 students curcently attending Palm Springs USD schools. However, this study ftnds that there could be a significant shortfall in future capital facilities revenue from insufficient future general obligation bond funds and/or RDA furids should the proposed reorganization be approved. Therefore, the proposed territory 29 transfer could leave the DeseR Sands USD with a significant revenue shortfall for financing land acquisition and facilities conshvction for two schoois to serve the proposed territory to be transferred. This revenue shortfall could have a substantial negative effect on the fiscal management and f scal status of the Desert Sands USD and is the basis for finding that this condition be deemed not substantially met. 34 Conclusion and Summary The followin�; table Iists a summary for each condition of EC §35753: CONDITION FII�TDING CONDITION l: The new district will be adequate in terms This condition would be substanrially of number of pupils enrolled. met. Cot�rDrr�oN 2: The districts are each organiaed on the basis of a substantiai community identity. COt�rDrrtotv 3: The proposat will result in an equitable division of property and facilities of the original district or districts. Cot�mrrloN 4: The reorganization of the district will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or se r�e ation. CotvDrrtoN 5: The proposed reorganization will not result in any substantial increase in costs to the state. CoND�7�oN 6: The proposed reorganization will not significantly disrupt the educational programs in the proposed district and districts affected by the proposed reorganization and will continue to promate sound educationaI performance in those districts. CotvDtT�orr 7: The propased reorganization will not result in a si�nificant increase in school housin� costs CoNDmoN 8: The praposed reorganizarion is not primarily designed to result in a significant increase in property values causing financial advantage to property owners because temtory was transferred from one school district to an adjoinin� district. This condition would be substantially met, This condition would be substantially met. This condition would be substantially met. This condition would be substantially met. This condition would be substantially met. This condition would not be substantially met. This condition would be substantially met. CotvnlTtotv 9: The proposed reorganization will not This condition would not be cause a substantial negative effect on the fiscal substantially met. management or fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reurganizalion. 31 Printed by the Riverside Counry �ce ojEducatioR ATTACHMENT 24 � RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON SCHOOL DISTRiCT ORGANIZATION; DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING, � ) � � � ) CERTiFIED CC�PY � TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS La Quinta, California Monday, April. 15, 2002 Reported by: �� SUZANNE STRINGFELLOW CSR No. Sb52 JOB No. 599724A 2100 N. Eroadway • Second Fioor • Santa Ana, CA 92706 714.834.I571 • Fax 719.834.9235 • 8 00.888.6949 1 � � � 2 3 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON SCHOOL DISTRICT 5 ORGANIZATION; DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 6 PUBLIC HEARING, 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ) ) ) ) ) ) Transcript of proceedings, taken at Desert Sands Unified School District, 47950 Dune Palms Road, La Quinta, California, beginning at 4:11 p,�n. and ending at 5:32 p.m., on Manday, April 15, 2002, before SUZANNE STRINGFELLOW, Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 5652. 2 Esquire DeposiEion Services 714.834.15']1 � i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3. 0 11 . 12 13 � 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APPEARANCES: Committee Members: BARRY BUSCH CYNTHIA CLARK RENE GARCIA CHARLOTTE JONES DAVID KASON ROBERT MAINIERO ROBERT O'DONNELL KENNETH RAY CARLUS SEPULVEDA SHAREN TOPHAM Business Advisory Services Manager JOCK FISCHER Assistant Superintendent of Schools BOWIE ARNESON, WILES & GIANNONE BY: ALEXANDER BOWIE 4920 Campus Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 (949} 644-8068 3 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 04:11 5 6 7 8 9 04:11 10 12 12 13 , 14 04:I1 15 16 17 18 19 04:11 20 21 22 23 24 �04:12 25 La Quinta, California, Monday, April 15, 2002 4:11 p.m. - 5:32 p.m. MR. GARCIA: I would iike to have you a1Z stand and join Mr. David Kason in the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance.) MR. GARCIA: At this time, I'd like to ask Ms. Sharen Topham to call the roll call for the members of the committee. MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Ray. MR. RAY: Aere. MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Johnson. Mr. Rason. MR. KASON: Aere. MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Sepulveda. Mr. O'Donnell. MR. 4'DONNELL: Present. MS. TOPHAM: Mrs. Jon�s. MS. JONES: Present. MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Garcia. MR. GARCIA: Here. MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Mainjero. MR. MAINJERO: Here. MS. TOPHAM: Mrs. Clark. MS. CLARK: Here. Fsquire Depasition 5ervices 714.834.1571 4 1 i 2 3 4 04:12 5 6 7 8 9 04:12 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:12 15 16 17 18 19 04:12 20 21 22 23 24 �04:13 25 MS. TOPAAM: Mr. Busch. MR. BUSCH: Here. MS. TOPHAM: Mrs. Hollingsworth. MR. GARCIA: Thank you, Ms. Topham. I'd like at this time to introduce the county staff that is present with us this afternoan. MS. TOPHAM: To my left a.s Bud Miller, your legal counsel for this afternoon. Sitting over in the AV area is Dr. Jock Fischer the assistant superintendent from the county office. And in the back is Mike Winters from Caldwell Flores Winters who will be providing the study tor this territary transfer. And Mr. Kim Trampas from the county staff AV, and Nancy McCall in back, in red, from the audiavisual area. MR. GARCIA: Thank you, Ms. Topham. At this time, I'd like to ask Ms. Topham, in terms of the overview of the terms of the public hearing this afternoon. 2he public hearing is regarding the transfer of territory from Palm Springs Unified School District to Desert Sands Unified School Di.strict. Monterey Avenue at Frank Sinatra Drive. Ms. Topham. MS. TOPHAM: This proposal was brought to you, the committee, as from -- a resolution from the Ci.ty of Palm Desert. You had a preliminary public hearing on this February the 20th, and voted to tentatively grant Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 5 1 � z 3 4 04:13 5 6 7 S 9 04:13 1� ii 12 13 � 14 04:14 15 I6 17 18 19 04:14 20 21 22 23 24 �04:14 25 the proposal and what that meant is that you would move it forward in the process and hold public hearings which in each affected district which you are holding today. It's approximately 2200 acres -- UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Excuse me, we cannot hear back here. MS. TOPHAM: It's approximately -- the territory to be transferred -- proposed for the trans£er is approximately 2200 acres. It's between Frank Sinatra, Monterey Avenue and Highway 10. It's relatively uninhabited territory. MR. GARCIA: Thank you, Ms. Topham. Some of the ground rules that we are going to have this afternoon is that this is will be a public hearing. This is not goinq to be a debate. So whenever you hear a staternent or a comment made by either party, I'm not going to a�low a cross-examination of that individual that�s testifying before the committee. Each of you, when you cal]. and have an opportunity to speak before this committee, basically will state your views and we will record them as we go along. This public hearing will be reconvened in Palm Springs Unified School District at 7:30 this evening, at 980 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Sprinqs. First of all, we are going to hear statements Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 6 , 1 � 2 3 4 04:14 5 6 7 8 9 04:15 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:15 15 16 17 18 19 04:15 20 21 22 23 24 �04:16 25 by the proponents of the transfer. This is what we refer to as an organizational presentation, and we are going to have a total of 20 minutes for this to take place. Following that, we are going to have the opponents of the transfer, the groups in this specific instance will be Palm Springs Unified School District will be in oppositian to this transfer, have a total of 20 minutes to make your presentation as a group. Following the two individual arganizational presentations, then we'll have input by the public and it will be limited to three minutes each and we hope that the tota]. of both groups will be about 30 minutes each. We'll have a timekeeper, so if you see a hand waiving at you, it means you've got a minute 3.eft. And, if not, you're goinq to ask you politely to terminate your presentation. We would like to thank you on behalf of the caunty co�mittee on the schaol board organization for coming here this afternoon and hopefully every side of this issue will have an equal opportunity to present their views. MS. TOPHAM: I just have two things. If you have something that you would like entered into the record or if you have something that you would like to be considered for the study, if you would turn that in Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 7 1 � 2 3 4 04:16 5 6 7 8 9 04:16 1Q li 12 13 � 14 04:16 15 16 i7 18 19 04:17 20 21 22 23 24 �04:17 25 to me and I'l1 make sure that Mike Winters receives that. And if you natice on the padium it has a greer�, red and yellow iight; when the red liqht comes on, your time is up. MR. GARCIA: Also, when you come to speak as an individual, we wauld like for you ta identify yourself and also give us your address. First order of business is statements by the proponents of the transfer. i'm going to recognize Mr. Bob Spiegel, City of Palm Desert. MR. SPIEGEL: Chairman, committee members, thank you very much far inviting us to be here today. You should all have received a folder like this. I promise you T won't take 20 minutes. I made a presentation at the original meeting arad was very happy to hear that the first blush approval of the request was made, which called then for this hearing. i will read from the cover letter: "On behalf o€ the City of Palm Desert, thank you for the opportuni.ty to once again address the issues of transferring territary from the Palm Springs Unified School District to the Desert Sands Unified School District. Having city borders correspond with the single schaol district Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.IS71 �� 1 � 2 3 4 04:17 5 6 7 8 9 04:17 10 11 12 13 . 14 04:18 15 16 17 �a �� 04:18 20 21 22 23 24 �04:18 25 boundaries will great].y contribute to and enhance Palm Desert's sense ot cammunity. "As the planned transfer area has no school assets and is largely undeveloped, our proposal will not negatively affect Palm Springs Unified School District. "The California State Education Code requires that any school district reorganization proposal presented ta the caunty com�nittee and State Board of Education meet certain criteria requirements under 35753{A)" -- and that's attached for your review, it's at the back of the folder. "Attached, also, is a report outlining how our proposal abides by these legal requirements and will not adversely affect either school district. Also attached is another report prepared by your staff under the requirements of 35705.5 which provides additional information on the prvposed transfer. "Our city staff is pleased to cooperate with the committee's independent consultant, Mr. Michael Winters of � Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 04:18 5 6 7 $ 9 44:19 10 i1 12 13 . 14 04:19 15 16 17 18 19 04:19 20 21 22 23 24 .04:19 25 Caldwell, Flores & Winters, who is going to be providing you with the necessary documentation to assist you in an unbiased analysis and proposal." His analysis will be looking at the financial aspects of the transfer and, if you have any questions, I'lI be giad to answer them at this time. MR. GARCiA: Mr. Spiegel, is there anyone from the City af Palm Desert who will make a presentation this afternoon. MR. SPIEGEL: I�m the only one. MR, GARCIA: Are there any questions by members of the committee. If not, thank you. MR. SPIEGEL: Thank you. MR. GARCIA: I'd like to ask Charlene WhitZinger to come before the committee at this time to make a presentation. • MS. WHITLINGER: Good evening. Thank you £or the opportunity to speak. My name is Charlene Whitlinger and T'm the assistant superintendent of business for Desert Sands School District, and I have just a few comments tonight. We would very much, as a district, like to support this land transfer into our district and support the citi2enry of the area. But in light of new Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 10 � 1 information regarding the proposed enrolled plan 2 amendment to this area, we will really need to review 3 4 the fiscal impact ta our district. Our district has been very fiscally responsibie, especiaily in dealing with growth, in our area. Therefore, we will be looking 04:20 5 6 forward to Mr. Winter's report on the fiscal impacts so 7 we'l1 have an opportunity to discuss with our board of 8 education and come out with some kind of support or 9 04:20 IO 11 12 13 � 14 nansupport. Thank you very much. MR. GARCIA: Are there any other organizations here this afternoon in favor of this proposed transfer? Hearing none, at this time I'm going to recognize the Palm Springs Unified School District, Dr. William 04:20 15 Diedrich. 16 17 18 19 04:21 20 21 MR. GARCIA: You've changed, Doctor. MR. AIKENS: He's changed, he's not number one. I'm Don Aikens. I�m president of the Board of Education of Palm Springs Unified School District, and I'm also president of the Riverside School Board Association. I have a few statements I'd like to make 22 in the opening before I turn it over to Dr. Diedrich. 23 On the surface, this petition looks good for 24 �04:2I 25 parents of the transfer area in the City of Palm Desert. Bu� after an in-depth examination, it indicates serious 11 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 09:21 5 6 7 8 9 04:22 1Q 11 12 13 � 14 04:22 15 16 17 18 19 04:22 20 21 22 23 24 �04:23 25 negative impact to thousands af students and parents, which is why the Board of Education of the Palm Springs Unified Schaol District unanimously voted to oppose this petition. Palm Springs Unified School District has plans ta provide two schools withi.n that particular area. It would be a great negative affect on students and parents specifically in Rancho Mirage and Thousand Palms if this petition went through. Also, it would have an adverse affect on continued overcrowding in the Cathedral City schools. Anather big item is the loss of $68 million in revenue that affects student services. It would have a negative impact to the taxpayers in the Palm Springs Unified School District area. And it does not improve the educational services; in fact, it negatively impacts educational services. Back in 1994, this same proposal was proposed at that time. It was denied, and the understanding at that time was that it was denied and that the schaol districts would want a plan in their future growth plans for this particular area. As yQu see, the petition isn't fair to most students and it isn't fair to the parents. Thank you. �squire Deposition Services 714.834.I571 12 1 � 2 3 4 44:23 5 6 7 8 9 04:23 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:23 15 16 17 18 19 04:23 2Q 21 22 23 24 �04:24 25 Do you have any questions? MR. GARCIA: Any questians by the members of the committee? If not, thank you very much. MR. AIKENS: Thank you, Dr. Diedrich. DR. DIEDRICH: Thank you. As you can tell, I'm not Mr. Aikens. I'm a lot shorter. I weigh almost as much, but I'm a lot shorter. Glad to see all of you and glad to have this opportunity to speak with you. �n the surface, this appears to be a rather simple proposal. Wouldn't it be nice if all of the city cauld be in one school district. On the surface, it appears like a very logical approach to doing public service. But, as you know -- and many of you are school board mem3�ers -- it doesn�t work that way. In fact, for most of you that are on school boards, you know that your school district services more than one city. That isn't just an average, it's the norm in the state of California. And so why would this be a problem? Well, it has to do somewhat with what Charlene mentioned when she came up here, that we do long-range planning and for the proposal to be dropped on someone as rapidly as this and to expect to meet all of the infrastructure needs and all of the schooling needs, it's going to be very Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 13 1 � 2 3 4 04:24 5 6 7 8 9 04:24 10 21 12 13 � 14 04:24 15 16 17 18 19 04:25 20 21 22 23 24 �04:25 25 difficult for any of the schoal district to plan for that. And, in fact, we know that because we have been planning for this area several years ago. In 1994 when the agreement was reached that -- we have reached the point of transferring land back and forth and many of you have been around long enough to know that that has been the history of the Pa1m Desert, Palm Springs area, Coachella and right in this Indio area. So there was an agreement, tacitly, passed that we wouZd in the future, hands aff, let's go ahead and proceed, and we did that. As a matter of fact, the Palm Springs Unified Schaol District beqan planninq and projecting for a bond issue. We projected in that bond issue to a number of things, but specifically to this area were to include middle school, elementary school and a high school. We relied on that information. We began planning for it. Not just for the base of students that would occupy that area, because we wanted to provide them with walking distances to their schools, but also as it impacted other schoois near there in the Pa].m Springs Unified School District. And I�m speaking specifically to Cathedral City Hi.gh School, James Workman Middle School and Ne11y N. Coffman Middle V 14 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 Schoals. Al1 schools that are currently overcrawded. � 2 3 4 04:25 5 6 7 8 9 In fact, if you take a look at Cathedral City High School alone, you'll note that in five years -- we are roughly 2500 down; in five years, we are going to be 3200. That school was designed for right around 2100 students. We knew that going in, we did plan for expansion going a,nto different areas, and this area is a critical part of that whole mix. We also wanted to include in this new area an 04:26 10 opportunity to work with the university, as that was ].1 announced, that came later. And we did meet with the 12 university. In fact, we met with Palm Desert city staff 13 and actuaZiy identi.fied plots within the area that's in � I4 question here for these new schools. 04:26 15 16 17 18 19 And so we made those commitments. In fact, when we bnilt our bond structure, it was set up in such a way that the redevelopmen� dollars out of that area were also to help us with building phase 1 of that high school. 04:26 20 Let's talk about what happ�ns if this land is 21 transferred. You've heard that there will be a negative 22 23 24 ��4:26 25 impact on the students of the Palm Springs Unified School District; you've heard i.t will be a negative impact on the taxpayers, and you're going to hear more detail about that b�fore the day is over, we will give 15 Fsquire De�sition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 04:27 5 6 7 8 9 d4:27 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:27 15 16 17 18 19 04:27 20 21 22 23 24 �Q4:27 25 yau specific numbers and things. The point we need to make here is it is not just about the students who currently reside in this area. No school district wants to wait until it's completely filled to make the decisians about where schools are going to be built, you do that while school -- while the area is still relatively empty, and that�s what we did. And so it a lot more than this particular area that we are talking about, it's the entire schao�. district, because it has significant fiscal responsibilities, significant fiscal implicativns and, in effect, does what we -- impedes what we are able to do for all of our kids. If this land is transferred, it's going to throw us back for a full year for the planning of that high schaol and it's going to result in a high school that's much smaller and will enable us to give what we cail strong coinprehensive educational program, much smaller, we will lose the economy of scale. And so I ask that you hear what our speakers have to say today, T ask that you listen to what our parents have to say, we are very concerned about this, and we'd urge you to reject this trans£�r. Thank you. Esquire Deposition Services 724.834.1571 16 1 � 2 3 4 04:28 5 6 7 8 9 04:28 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:28 15 16 17 18 19 04:29 20 21 22 23 24 �04:29 25 MR. GARCIA: Thank you, Dr. Diedrich. Meredy Shoenberger. Oh, you're coming up after Mr. -- go ahead. MR. SCHMIDT: Bill Schmidt. I'm the director of facilities planning development for the school district. What i wanted to talk about is what, in fact, we have planned for -- not only for this area because, as you look at the way Palm Springs Unified is develaped, it's developed into attendance areas. And this transfer area is part of the attendance area that includes or will include Thausand Palms and Rancho Mirage. One of the thi.ngs we did back about four years ago is we divided our district into three high school attendance areas. And that's recognized by the office of public school of construction. That's different than most other school districts, but it gave us a leg up on eligibility when we did that. So as a part of our plan for this area, you always have to keep in mind that the of K-8 school, the middie school portion also will serva.ce Rancho Mirage and Thousand Palms, the high school also services Rancho Mirage and Thousand Palms. There is an effect by this area. Let's go to Exhibit D. What occurs as you look 17 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 p4:29 5 6 7 8 9 04:30 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:30 15 16 17 18 i9 04:31 20 21 22 23 24 �09:31 25 at the walking distance or driving distance between these, the transfer area and the schools, you can see that in Palm Springs Unified, the elementary that services -- currently services the area is 5.1 miles away. The middle school is 7.5, and the high school is 7.4. Desert Sands, their elementary school is 2.5 from the transfer area, 3.4 for the middle and 4.4 for the high school. However, when the new K-8 school is built, when the new hiqh school is built, they are within a mile of �his entire transfer area. In other words, parents will be able to have their kids walk to school or walk them to school, as they see fit. Let's go to Measure S. Back in November of 20U0, we presented to our voters this bond measure that totaled $72.5 million. The projects in it total 89.5 million, but we kind of expect we are going to get some state funding on these projects. Under our Measure P that was passed by the voters in 1992 for $70 million, we did about $184 million worth of projects. So we expect probably not as great a return from the state, but certainly enough to cover ali these prajects. In that Measure 5, we totally funded the new middle school for this area, and we totally funded a new elementary; therefore, we have funded a K-8 school. Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 18 1 � 2 3 4 04:3i 5 6 7 a 9 04:32 10 il 12 13 • 14 04:32 15 16 17 18 19 04:32 20 21 22 23 24 �04:32 25 In the high school, however, we funded only the site acquisition and we founded the planning for the high school. The construction of the high school is planned to come out of the redevelopment dollars. And the reason we did is because our voter survey of a bond m�asure said that as long as we kept it under $25 per 100,000, we would get a high rating and pass it, so we did that. So if we lose that redevelopment revenue, we lose the construction of the first phase of this high school, and we would have to take a look at going back to our voters to pass north bond measure. And, as you can see, we have a bond measures there for the entire projects and it's over a periad of time. And, as you'll notice, we planned on starting both site acquisitions in 2002. Obviously, that's been curtailed because of some of these oth�r developments, and we actually start the constructi.on of the middle school in 2003. And we would have it open in 2006-2007 schoo.I year . �ne of the statements I think I heard on the radio station is that if we lose that redevelopment revenue, it won't hurt us because we lose those students. Well, let's show them what the effect of that is. Esquire De}�osirion Services 714.834.1571 19 1 � 2 3 4 04:33 5 6 7 8 9 04:33 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:33 15 16 17 18 19 04:34 20 Z1 22 23 24 �04:34 25 At the middle school, in essence, by having to reduce population of, say, 750 instead of 100d, we onJ.y say -- is that 2.3? It's �2.3 million -- $2.7 million. On the high school, we save $13 million. Those core areas -- those core areas we still need to provide for kids, whether it's 750 or 1000, and the main thing you're reducing in these of these instances is classroom. Alex Bowie is going to come up and talk, specifica].Iy, about five of the conditions. MR. BOWIE: Thank you very much. It's a pleasure to be here. MR. GARCIA: Sir, could you identify yourself, sir, for the committee because we don't have a paper for you. MR. BOWIE: For the purpose of the record, my name is Alex Bowie; I'm an attorney. I represent the Palm Springs Unified School Aistrict, have done so in regard to both of the successful bond el.ections. Our firm is Bowie, Arneson and the address is 4920 Campus Drive. And we will just make a few brief comments in regard ta a few of the items that were referred to as the statutory criteria. But befare doing that, just so that you know there is a very, very strong feeling and a unanimity of Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1572 20 1 � 2 3 4 04:34 5 6 7 8 9 04:34 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:35 15 is 17 1a 19 04:35 20 21 22 23 24 �04:35 25 the members of the baard of the Palm Springs Unified School District. If those -- I believe they are substantially all here, if you might just rise so that members of the committee can see that our board members are all here and see that they feel strongly about this as well. The representative of the City of Pa1m Des�rt made reference to a code section, and certainly wouldn't want to take your time reviewing something that you are i'm sure are very familiar with or will be advised about, but I think it's very important to note that there are nine specific statutory criteria. Yvu will be required make an affirmative finding on each one of those nine. If you're not able to make that affirmative finding, you are precluded, as a matter of law, from approving of this praposed reorganization. In regazd to the first of those items, and that is whether, if this were to be approved, there would be an adequate number of students. But we ail know how huge Desert Sands is, and we all know how huge the area is in Palm Spri.ngs, so we were trying to analyze those or look at those total areas, it would really be kind of a raeaningless exercise. Those of you who might have been here before when we addressed the proposed 4,000 acres to be taken Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 21 1 i 2 3 4 04:35 5 6 7 8 9 04:36 la 1i 12 13 � 14 04:36 15 16 17 18 19 04:36 20 21 22 23 24 �04:37 25 from Coachella School District to go to Desert Sands, the analysis was based on the planning area involved. The planning area, in this instance, of Palm Springs Unified School District that Mr. Diedrich referred to includes the transfer area of 2200 acres, the Thousand Palms area, 2000 acres, and the City of Rancho Mirage, about 7500 acres. So that's the planning area that needs to be used in making these assessments. So would there be an adequate number o£ students afterwards in the planning area that Mr. Diedrich described for you? And the answer is no. If the area is lost, the K-8 school will shrink, the high school will shrink, but your costs don't qa down in a straight-line basis. The bottom line of those numbers that Mr. -- Mr. Schmidt mentioned, the high school per student goes from 22,000 to $36,000 per student, if you were ta approve this transfer; that's quite a hit. 64 percent per student increase in costs. And the K-6 qaes from 18,000 it 21,700. But the point is, planning is a long-term phase, they planned for the bond issue, they relied on what '94 was done. But in the end, if it were to be approved, there would not be a sufficient number of students for them to come out where they are planning -- on the basis o� where their planning has been based, so Esquite Deposition Services 714.834.2571 22 1 � 2 3 4 04:37 5 6 7 8 9 04:37 10 il 12 13 � 24 04:37 15 16 17 18 19 04:38 20 21 22 23 24 �04:38 25 I don't believe there will be an adequate number of students within the planning area of which the transfer area is a part. That's item No. 1, I don't think you can make a finding. No. 2, and that is the issue about community identity. And we certainly don't want to spend our time reading the statutes. But it says it will have defined that the district are each organized on the basis of substantial community identity. That doesn't mean we have to enhance community identity, we don't have to do something ta make it 100 percent. Tt just means if the result were gaing to go a lack af community identity, then you wouldn't be able to do it. You see, community identity exists today. I think, when this exhibit goes up, you're going to see maybe 80 percent of the City of Palm Des�rt is already in Desert Sands, so community identity exists today. Community identity will exist if disapproved, community identity will exist if it were to be appraved, if that were possible, we don`t believe it is possible from meeting all those criteria that the city has pointed out to you. So I think you've got to really look at that second item; community identity already exists. So what are we taI.king about? The statute doesn't say you have Esquire Depositioa Services 714,834.1571 23 0 � 1 to have coterminous boundaries. In fact, the cities 2 that are served by multiple school districts in the 3 caunty of Riverside are Banning, Beaumont, Calle Mesa, 4 04:38 5 6 7 8 9 04:38 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:39 15 16 17 18 19 04:39 20 2I 22 Coachella, Corona, Hemet, Indio, La Quinta, Lake Elsinor, Moreno Valley, Murrietta, Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Perris, Rancho Mirage, Riv�rside and San Jacinto. So if you approve this one, I'll bet you're going to be really, really very busy; I think it's a very danqerous precedent. Again, that isn't what the statute says, everybody gets coterminous. It says that if you make a change, make sure you haven't taken land out which leaves somebody without community identity. And I think that's really what the statute says. Trying to guickly move to another point, is equitable division of property. What property are we taZking about? If you drove out on the treeway, the only thing that's in there is the Kaufman and Broad homes; there isn't any property. The only property we're talking about is a redevelopment passu agreement that has a value of $38 million. That's the 38 million they think they're going to be using to build the 23 balance of the community. The K-8 school is totally 24 funded, ready to come on-line. In fact, the City of �04:39 25 Pa�m Desert helped them locate the site. There was no 24 Esquire Deposition Services '114'834.1571 � 1 discussion in this joint used, jointly planned site 2 about we may be filing to take this away. If that were 3 the plan, then it was certainly a funny way to work 4 together to plan the cvmmunity's needs. So there was no 04:39 5 equitable division of p�operty, there's no property 6 except for that passu agreement. 7 Now, maybe what we would be taking about is if 8 9 04:40 10 ii 12 13 � 14 44:4p 15 16 17 18 19 04:40 20 21 22 23 24 �4:41 25 this were to be approved, that the City of Palm Desert might try to set aside that agreement, the tax income money would still be there, maybe it could ga to the developer to provide some of the infrastructure for this development. That's just a surmise, but I think that's certainly a possibility. In regard to item 5, that is the question of state costs, and we wi11 be addressing that just a little bit later. There�s also the question, and we discussed -- it's certainly a sensitive issue -- about racial and ethnic and discrimination and those issues, which we will certainly talk about later. Increasing housing costs, item No. 7, it's obviously going to do that. We talked about how in the high school per student, it will run from 22,000 per student to 36,004. i don't see how you wi11 find that it is not increasing the housing cost to the residual of the planning area that is left behind. 25 Fsquire Depositiou Services 714.834.1571 1 MR. FISCHER: Sir, you have one minute. � 2 MR. BOWIE: One more minute. Just use that one 3 last minute. I'll use that last minute to talk about 4 04:4i 5 6 7 8 9 04:41 10 11 12 I3 � 14 04:41 15 other, because we did talk about affirmative findings will be necessary in all nine. Other is in your discretion, it's in your court, but what might other be. To me, it seems like other was these two school districts reached an understandinq in '94 as to where these boundaries were going to be, and largely Palm Springs gave up territory, they didn't really get anything. So to make understanding so planning could be done so people could rely on it, just as Desert Sands had a bond issue without this territory included, Palm Springs had a bond issue with the territory included. So we'll have an opportunity at 7:30 to touch 16 briefly on some other issues, but thank you very much 17 for listening to these comments and being so gracious as 18 19 04:42 20 21 22 23 24 �09:42 25 to acknowledqe the presence of the board members of the Palm Springs Unified School District. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Thank you. I'd like to recognize one more individual, Meredy Shoenberger. MS. SHOENBERGER: Mr. Garcia, I didn't put down on my card exactly when I would like to speak, so if there's time on the end, I would like to save my time 26 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � z 3 4 04:42 5 6 7 8 9 04:42 20 11 12 I3 . 14 04:43 15 16 17 18 I9 04:43 20 21 22 23 24 �04:43 25 f or then . MR. GARCIA: Professional courtesy, ma'am. We have heard both sides in terms af organizational presentations. At this time, I am going to be recognizing individuals for individual public input. The first group that I'm going to be recagnizing is indivi.duals who are in favor of the transfer. And I'm going to go alphabetical to the best of my abiZity. If I mispronounce yaur name, don't wait for me outside, please. First person is Gerard Andrade, and you have three minutes to come before this committee. MR. ANDRADE: Hello. My name is Gerard Andrade. I live in 73621 Heatherwood Drive in Palm Desert in the affected area, and in the proposed transfer area. We have three children who are 8, 11 and 2 1/2 years old, and we are very much in favor of the transfer to Desert Sands School District. We have lots of reasons why we support this transfer, but I can only say a few. Well, the main thing is that Desert Sands schools are a lot closer and there are like the elementary school -- he already put it up there, the dis�ances -- but you have to go across the freeway, you Fsquire Depositioa Services 714.834.1571 27 1 � 2 3 4 04:44 5 6 7 8 9 04:44 1Q 11 12 13 � 14 09:4�! 15 16 17 18 19 04:44 20 21 22 23 29 �04:45 25 know, on a major highway, 74, across the freeway, to get to the elementary school. In the middle school, you have ta ga through Rancho Mirage and then you get to Cathedral City to go to the middle school and the high school. And if aur daughter ended up going to the middle school, she would have to get up at 5:30 in the morning to get to the bus at 6:00 40 in the morning tv go all the way to the middle school. I know that they are planning on building the schaols, but they haven't purchased the sites yet, they -- the high schooi, from what I understand, it's going to take a good seven years just to build that, you know, once they get the property and all that other stuff. And, by then, my older two will be out of high school and already have them graduated. I also wanted to mention that the City of Palm Desert does a lot with our schools in the area. They have a mini fireman's muster for all the elementary schools in the area. They have poetry, arts and -- I forget the name -- contests. They just do a lot af things with the schools that I would like my kids to take advantage of, you know, it's the city I live in and it should be the schools that they go to. MR. FISCHER: One minute. Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 � 1 � z 3 4 04:45 5 6 7 8 9 04:45 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:46 15 Zb 17 18 19 09:46 20 21 22 23 24 �04:46 25 MR. ANDRADE: And I just -- also, I just -- I went on the Internet and I looked up the Palm Springs web site, it's Palm Springs School District web site, and they don't even mention that they serve Palm Desert or even portions of Palm Desert. It just says that "Serving the desert communities Cathedral City, Desert Hot Springs, Palm Springs, Rancho Mirage and Thousand Palms. There's nothing in here about Palm Desert or anything like that. And there is quite a few of homes there, not just Rau£man and Broad, there's another about four or fivs more deveZopments in that area. And I just hope you take it into consideration, you know, people who actually live there. And thank you very much for listening. MR. GARCIA: Jennifer Andrade. MS. ANDRADE: Hi. Jennifer Andrade, and I live at 73621 Heatherwood Drive in Palm Desert. It's the Kaufman and Broad area. I'm going to read a person for somebody that was not hear, my spot here. "We are very sorry that we are unable to attend the school district territory transfer proposal meeting. We are very much in favor to have the area that we have live in be transferred from Palm Springs Unified School District to Desert Sands Unified School District. "We moved into our neighborhood sa that we Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 29 1 � 2 3 4 04:46 5 6 7 8 9 04:47 10 il 12 13 � 14 04:47 15 lb 17 18 19 04:47 20 21 22 23 24 �04:48 25 could be around other families with children, we'd enjoy carpooling and other things in common with our nea.ghborhood children and families. And at the present time we are unable to do these things because the kids in the neighborhood don't all attend the same school district. Our home is, in fact, closer to schoois in Desert Sands Unified School District rather than Palm Springs Unified School District. It would make more sense ta attend a schoal that is closer in distance than to a school that is farther away. Our address is in Palm Desert not Palm Springs. We feel this transfer wiil be beneficial to ali involved. Thank you for considering this important boundary change. Elgin, Catherine and Spencer Bray, and they live at 74062 College View Circle West, Palm Desert, 92111. Thank you." MR. GARCIA: The next individual just has one name, Barbara. Is there someone by the name of Barbara that lives at 73590 Woodward Drive? Next person to be recognized is Joe Batok. MR. BATOK: My name is Joe Batok, and I live at 73500 Woodward, which is in the Kaufman and Broad homes, which is, again, as was just mentioned previously are not the only group of homes there. It's been several years since a neighbor and Fsqu'ue Deposition Services 714.834.1571 30 1 � 2 3 4 Q4:48 5 6 7 8 9 04:48 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:49 Z5 25 17 18 I9 04:49 20 21 22 23 24 �04:49 25 myself first put in -- or started a petition reqarding the Kaufman and Broad homes which were not yet completely developed. The petition was later rejected for some legal term because, for some legal reason, our reasons were not completely stated clearly or they did not correspond in the two different petitions that we had. At any rate, I'm glad the process has come this far because we really would like to see this go through. The people from Palm Springs district have thrown up a lot af numbers on the screen. I think if you want to define some numbers that really count, poll the people over where we live to see which schovl district they would like and I think you might fi.nd about lOQ percent in favor of the Desert Sands School District. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Melinda Clanton. MS. CLANTON: I want to thank you for considering this for us, and --- MR. GARCIA: Ma'am, could you identify yourself and where you reside. MS. CLANTON: I'm Melinda Clanton and I'm i.n the Kaufman and Broad area. MR. GARCIA: Could you give us your address, pZease. Fsquire Deposition Services 7I4.834.1571 31 � 1 MS. CLANTON: I want to thank you, Mr. Spiegel, 2 for doing this for us. I prabably won't to be able 3 talk, probably have to sit down, but I didn't know that 4 I lived in that area that was Palm Springs. I know of 04:49 5 lot of us were told that we could go to any schooi, that 6 was fine. I inherited a set of twins when my sister 7 died and so I put them in school in Palm Springs School 8 District. They went to Della Lindley. And they had to 9 get on the bus, they were the first on the bus that 04:50 10 start�d the kids off because they were on the bus so ii 12 23 . 14 04:50 15 16 17 18 19 04:54 20 21 22 23 24 �04:51 25 long, and t�hen by the time they qot to school they were already tired. I won't go intv all the negatives about the school but as soon as the kids are in fifth grade, they are now in private school and I pay $500 a month. All the numbers and stuff from Palm Springs are great but my kids are qoing to be out of school by then. These twins deserve to go to school with their neighborhood kids. But because we can afford to pay -- we make ourselves be able to pay for a private schvol, now we have to consider -- especially if they are going to do this in who knaws how many years for high school -- I may have to send my kids to boarding school because af the school. The school district is not letting them go and trying to -- I`m sorry for crying but it's very 32 Esquire Depositioa Services 714.834.1571 1 � Z 3 9 04:51 5 6 7 8 9 04:51 10 ii 12 13 � 14 Q4:51 15 16 17 18 19 04:52 20 21 22 23 24 �04:52 25 emotional �or us. You have to deal with this, you have to deal with the kids that would have to be on the bus for all those hours. You don�t even talk about -- none o•f you consider the traumatic experiences af dealing with a bus, sitting on a bus for all those hours. And when the kids finally get home, it's so Iate and then they have to do homework. Now, Laidlaw, there's been many instances -- I mean filed reports about how terrible -- I mean they would forqet our area, and then they wouldn't even want do it, they wouldn't even come back and pick up the kids. I want to thank you for considering us, for us families, thank you. MR. GARCIA: Next person, just vne name, Glenn. MS. GLENN: Hi, my name is Christy Glenn, and I live at 37743 Drexell Drive in Palm Desert, in the Kaufman and Broad homes. I'l1 just make it short. In my opinion, it all boils down to money. And like the gentleinan said earZier, if you come to our cammunity and take a vote on which school di.strict we would prefer, it would definitely be Desert Sands Unified. Thank you. Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 33 1 . 2 3 4 04:52 5 6 7 8 9 04:53 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:53 15 16 17 Z8 19 09:53 20 21 22 23 24 ,04:54 25 MR. GARCIA: Cathy Johnson. CATHY JOHNSON: My name is Cathy Johnson. I live at 73540 Woodward Drive in the proposed transfer area in the Kaufman and Broad homes. I used to live in Cathedra]. City. My older daughter went to Paim Sprinqs High School. My younger daughter went to Cathedral City Ha.gh School. We now live in Palm Desert. My son goes to Palm Desert High School. We applied for a interdistrict transfer. He has been there for two years, hopefully -- well, no, he will graduate from Palm Desert High School, whether this goes through or not. If, for some reasan, Palm Springs should decide to deny a interdistrict transfer for the finai two years af his high school education, I will put him at my parents' house who live in the Chapperel Country Club which is located within the Desert Sands School District. We live in Palm Desert, my son's friends live in Palm Desert, he wants to go to school with his friends at Palm Desert High School and that's how everybody in our neighborhood feels. Thank you very much for your time. MR. GARCIA: Anica Rusneac. MS. RUSNEAC: Hi, my name is Anica Rusneac, I bought a new house at 74104 College View Ciscle in Palm Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 34 I � 2 3 4 04:54 5 6 7 8 9 04:54 10 11 12 13 � 14 04:55 15 I6 17 ia 19 04:55 20 21 22 23 24 �04:56 25 Desert. And I can't believe to live in Palm Desert and my kids to go to Palm Springs school. Z found out just when I was in escrow; it was too late. I have two kids, 15 years and 13, daughter and son, and because i work nights, 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., Monday through Friday, I found i have the family in Palm Desert Iike a guardian and I take kids during the night to sleep over and aiso T had to need to move them to Palm Desert High School one and Palm Desert middie school another one. The big problem is that I have a daughter, she's playing tennis, she was number two at Palm Springs High School last year and at Palm Desert High School is not available for school activity. So they kick her out immediately from tennis team. She lost one year, she's a good tennis player and she la.kes tennis very much. But the rule is rule, and my house it's in Pa1m Desert but I belong to PaZm Springs. So naw Nadia lost one year and, you know, T am so upset. I support strongly ta move our area, my house close ta -- it's in Palm Desert, so I can't accept to take my kids to Palm Springs. If it's possible, next year, we will be so happy, not just me but aIl my neighbors. Thank you very much. Esquire Deposition Services ?14.834.1571 35 1 � 2 3 4 04:56 5 6 7 8 9 04:56 10 11 1z 13 � 14 04:57 15 16 17 1$ 19 04:57 20 21 22 23 24 �04:57 25 MR. GARCIA: Thank you, ma'am. Mrs. Sharqawi. MS. SHARQAWI: Hi, my name is Kelly Sharqawi. My address is 37624 Colebridge and I live in the Kaufman and Broad homes and I am here because I gravely, strongly, I plead to you for this change for all of us. It's very emotional for myself, also, I'm sure, just along with many people. I have three children. I have a 19 year old; she graduated at Palm Desert High SchooZ when I first moved out here eight years ago. She went to Palm Desert whEn we purchased a home over at Kaufman and Broad, unbeknownst to me, I was not aware that I was not in the district. She continued going to that high school, no questions asked, I never had a transfer, nathing. Why would I even question it? I live in Palm Desert, same zip cade. I never thought nothing of it until my youngest, I tried to put him into Carter and they told me I couldn't put him there. So now have my chi.ld at a private school, also, my younger one, and so there's no money that Palm Springs is getting from him either. So I'm sure that's possibl.y the case for a lot of people. My problem is T have a 15 year al.d that does go to Palm Desert Aigh School also. And although I have my Fsquire Depositioo Services 714.834.1571 36 1 � 2 3 4 04:58 5 6 7 8 9 04:58 10 li 12 13 � 14 04:58 15 15 17 18 19 04:58 24 21 22 23 24 �04:59 25 paperwork already done for next year, whether you guys put this through our not, I'm faced with a problem for next year. The worry, the -- that uncertainty knowing and not knowing ii it's going to go through and what am I going to do -- I, myself, when I was 16 years old, my parents uprooted me from my junior high and it was so traumatic and so traumatizing for me, I wiZl not put my son through that. I bel.ieve a kid qoes through school four years, high school, and that's the mos� important time that they have, and I will not pull him out. And it's just an unfortunate thing that I might be faced with, the decision of being backed up in a corner, whether it's buying another house, moving somewhere else, that's how it will be. Thank you for listening to me, I really hope you guys give this consideration because we are not just a set nf homes. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Stacy Wensel. MS. WENSEL: Hi. My name is Stacy Wensel. I reside at 74119 College View Circle East, and I move there in September and it's one of six new projects that sit next to Kaufman and Broad, so there are a lot more families getting ready to move in there and a lot of development gaing on. Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 37 1 � And I'm also a product of the Palm Springs Unified School District, going to Rancho Mirage 2 3 Elementary, N�lly Coffman and Palm Springs High School. 4 So my reason for being here has nothing to do with one 09:59 5 district over another. I went on ta college afterwards, 6 I feel I had a prosperous fulfilling education. 7 My reason for coming up and speaking foz this 8 land transfer is a few things. First, logistically, you 9 saw the minutes away from our resident -- or where we 04:59 10 live. I also work within that same radius, so 11 emergencies, I'm that much closer to my child, if there 12 13 � 14 a5:00 15 is an emergency. As a participating parent, I'm that rnuch closer to being able to work and participate, whereas as with Palm Springs Unified right now wher� the schools are, it's a little harder, a little bit more of 16 a juggling act. 17 My other concern is the social development of 18 19 05:00 20 21 22 �5:00 25 my child. And that would be, livinq in Palm Desert, he has the opportunity to play soccer within four miles from our house; he has the opportunity to play baseball; he can get, if he chooses to play golf, he can play right acrass the street at Desert Willow for a resident 23 fee, which in the other, Palm Springs and stuff Zike 24 that, he wou2dn't be able to get a resident fee. When I talk about social development, the city Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 � 1 � 2 3 4 05:00 5 6 7 8 9 05:01 10 �1 12 13 � 14 05:01 15 16 17 18 ]. 9 OS:Q1 20 21 22 23 24 �05:01 25 you live in is where you play sports. Palm Springs has their sport leagues, Cathedral City has their sports leagues. If my child goes to Thousand Palms, even if I wanted to have him play extracurricular activities wi�h the kids he went to school with, he couldn't because of those situatians there. So socially, I'm afraid he would be an outcast at schoal not being able to participate ar talk the same lingo with the kids he goes to school with. My other concern is the representation I would have as a Palm Desert res�dent in the Palm Sprinqs Unified School District, which would be little or none, as far as on the board. Currently, the board is predominantly ran by Palm Springs residents, which isn't a negative thing, it's just the way it is and it�s just what happens. Growing up in Rancho Mirage, I believe the only representation, if any, that we had was in the '70s with Susan Marks, so that's another concern I have as far as ever being represented fully in Palm Springs. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Thank you. Theresa Velin. MS. VELIN: Ai. My name is Theresa Velin, and I reside at 37623 Colebridge in the Kaufman and Broad Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 39 1 � Z 3 4 05:02 5 6 7 8 9 05:02 10 11 12 13 � 14 05:02 15 16 17 18 19 05:02 20 21 22 23 24 �05:02 25 homes, which is in the proposed transfer area. And I just have a very simple analoqy to give, which is i choose to go �o the grocery store that is closest to me, I don't choose to go to a grocery store that is 20 minutes away and I would like my school-aged child to be given the same choice. You've all been parents and you aZl know the logistics of driving here and driving there and making sure -- we are closer to the Desert Sands -- the example -- we are closer to Desert Sands schools and it would just be easier. As a community, we've talked a lot about community, Kaufman and Broad, in the sounding tracks, are a community. And i find it very interesting, as Mr. Andrade said, that if you go ta the Palm Springs Unified School District sa.te, and it talks about the communities, Palm Desert is not one of the ones that's listed. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Okay. We've heard individuals from th� community in favor of this transfer. At this time, I'm gaing to be recognizing individuals that are opposed to this transfer. Again, in alphabetical order, I'm going to start with Alex Bowie. Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 40 � 1 � 2 3 4 05:03 5 6 7 8 9 05:43 10 11 12 13 � 14 05:03 15 16 17 18 19 05:04 2d 21 22 23 29 �05:04 25 MR. BOWIE: I've already spoken. MR. GARCTA: Okay. Gary Butler. MR. BUTLER: My name is Gary Butler, 37222 Ferber Drive in Rancho Mirage. After hearing all the homevwners in Cattonwood Drive, I don't know if I should chanqe my decision. But not quite, not quite. If I].ived there, I would be sitting back there with you, I can guarantee you, based on the arguments that you've brought forward, same thing as you'ze doing. Being a resident of Rancho Mirage, we saw our kids, after they left school, fifth grade, be divided. We had -- a lot of the kids or students and parents that decided to take their children, however they had to do it, to the Palm Desert schools, the other half of us decided, no, we are going to stick and go through with Pal.m Springs Unified. We are glad we did. I mean I�m happy to say I can boast about our experiences there and we have got four children, ten years of practice with four different schools and the teachers and staff and principals there, as well as the school district; we have had a very favorable experience. When it daes come down to geographicai Fsquire Deposition Services '714'834.1571 41 � 1 � 2 3 4 05:04 5 �ogistics, I mean I certainly understand where they are coming from. The thing I'm looking at here, however is the fact that Palm Springs Unified, at this point, is looking long term and looking forward to the iuture as to what's best for the communities and what is best for 6 the families and students. 7 8 9 05:04 10 11 12 13 � 14 05:05 15 16 17 18 19 05:05 20 �1 Understanding there's problems, I mean if my kids were in their situation right now, I would be fighting alI the way through on this thing. And we have to kind of participate together and do what's right, whatever that happens to be, that's going to be best for the families long term. Palm Springs Unified is looking toward that with the pl.ans of these new schools. T mean if those new schooJ.s were in place right now, these people would be very happy campers, they would walk their kids to school. It doesn't really matter whether if it's Desert Sands or Palm Springs School District, they'd be happy just having that geographical proximity. Both school districts are good school districts, I think we'll all agree with that, it's not a campetitive head clashing 22 here. 23 It's a matter of doing what�s right, and right 24 now Palm Spra.nqs Unified has plans to build new schools. �U5:05 25� Desert Sands, as tar as I'm aware of, does not have 42 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � Z 3 4 05:05 5 6 7 8 4 05:06 10 1i 12 13 � 14 05:06 15 16 17 18 i9 45:06 20 21 22 23 24 ,05:06 25 those plans, or anything clase to where they are at. At least we can look forward to new schools, which we need so desperately, because as was explained earlier, Rancho Mirage Elementary, Nelly Coffman Middle School, Cathedral City High School are very, very overcrowded and we need those new schools for expansion in there. So from the residents of Rancho Mirage, we are happy to say we just want you to do what's right regardless of GOSt. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Adrian de la Torre. MR. DE LA TORRE: Good afternoon. My name is Adrian de la Torre. My address is 30769 Monte Vista Way, Thousand Palms. I have two sisters. The aldest is seven years old, and she is currently enrolled at De11a Lindley� Elementary. The school is named Della Lindley because it was named after a woman who wanted to make a difference. 5he wanted to -- she wanted tv teach kids so they could grow up and have an education. Mrs. Lindley taught her kids nothing more than simp].e box car. One of her students married a].awyer, one became an inventor, one became a car maker in Hollywood. And Mrs. Lindley made a huge difference in her time. She had a school built in her honor in Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 43 I � 2 3 4 05:07 5 6 7 8 9 05:07 10 11 iz 13 � 14 05:07 15 ].6 17 i8 19 05:0$ 20 21 22 23 24 �05:08 25 Thousand Palms. But Thousand Palms, like most cities, nowadays is a thriving city; it's small but getting bigger. And more and more people are moving in and the school is getting overcrowded. And I can tell you that from a personal point of view because I go to Cathedral City High School. So I'm here to ask you, if one woman can make a difference, ii one woman can have a school established, can we, the parents, the students, the citizens of Thousand Palms have this land so that we can give the new generation of children a chance to be educated in their own new school and in their own elementary school and in their own'high school. People, ladies and gentlemen -- if Mrs. Lindley was to think greatly for making a school out of a box car, imagine the great publicity vr things you will get for letting us have this land, so the next generation can get educated. You are here to make an important decision and we hope that you will make the right decision and, like I said, my school, too, is overcrowded. Try getting from the east side of the building to the west side during lunch, during passing period, is like walking through Disneyland during the summer, it's very crowded, you know. Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 44 1 � 2 3 4 05:08 5 6 7 8 9 U5:09 10 11 12 I3 � 14 05:09 15 16 17 I8 19 05:09 20 21 22 23 24 �05:10 25 Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Dalia de la Torre. MS. DE LA TORRE: Hi. My name is Dalia de ].a Torre. I live in 30769 Monte Vista Way, Thousand Palms. I have been in Thousand Palms for like 17 to 18 years. I have my son wha goes to Cathedral City High School. I have a child in elementary school, in second grade, and one, another child that is three years old, she wi].i be going to elementary school a.n two more years. We need this new schools because of the overcrowding. A11 of our students at that high school can hardly walk in the halls or have a decent lunch. A1]. our 2200 kids eat at the same time. Measure 5 was passed ta build our new schools. The funding is already here, as is the land already decided for this. Why would we nat need new schools if you're qoing to build new homes? This would be beneficial to all our taxpayers. There are plans ta build over 1500 new homes in our area alone, and there is no room in the existing schools now. So that's all. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Kathy Gardner. If you can hold your applause because our ta.me is running kind of short, so we can make sure everybody has an equal chance, I'd appreciate it. Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 45 1 � 2 3 4 OS:IO 5 6 7 $ 9 05:10 10 11 12 13 * 14 05:1d 15 16 17 18 19 05:11 20 21 22 23 24 �05:11 25 MS. GARDNER: Hi. My name is Kathy Gardner, I live at 28855 Via Las Palmas in Thousand Palms. I just wanted to state that I'm a proud parent of a son who has been going to the Palm Springs Unified School District for the past five years. My son and his classmates have been going to a wonderful schoal but it is extremely overcrowded. My son is one of the top s�udents in his class. He's making straight A's, but with this denial of a new school he will be one of the kids to fall through the cracks when he gets to middle school and high schaol if this propdsal does not go through, because both schools that he will have to attend are really overcrowded. I have personal].y gone and passed out, we have petitions signed ot other parents in our school. We have 233 signatures so far in the two days' notice of this hearing. They are all expressed the same feelings that I have, and this is that we need these new schools. They are willing and waiting for us to say the word and will all come and express their concerns in regards ta now letting us have this land and which we truly do deserve. Please do not let us have to tell our children that because we live on tihe other side of the railroad tracks that we were denied the school and that Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 46 �o c o � a o � vs v� in �n tn .. .. .. .. . /-+ N !� i�+ F� N N N V t-+ N N N N N N 1--� 1--� M F-+ F-+ 1-� F-+ Y 1-' F-' lJ1 �D W N l--� O �O OD �1 O� ll� �C► W N F+ O �D 00 J Ot lJ� �P W N F-+ � � a� �C n �d H �-n fi H w KS E N o � w o o a � o � � � c� �o ro � �• ro � � cn a n cu m � o � w m � �d cn G fi �s a ha m n Q. m G w m O iD n N cD �-h O �' rt n rt' t1► 'D �t fi � �' � 0� C W rh � (D f-s, �Ll p► rfi O � � �' � H O N tn ►-i (D �A � iD H O N O 0► �3 tD N• ID �]. O � S]. H t0 H �. O G cfi W if' ci' F-'• Y !-+• Ifi C7 � tt A1 f'�' n t7 fD M �'S N• � a� a- n a K w m co o ►� � o w *d h w � �r E o �• m cu H o v� H � � cn m fi w o �-+► o m H �a � m 'C tn N w m �' r � l7 o f+ �' � E r+, � �' m �n E m �n � o N �• m o� K ro � � m � a. m o� �+ w o o �n o x sv � m o ti a� n �r a m �• � � � n c ►� �+ rr � � K n+ N• � v� r cv w w �a w H � r+� � ra cu N r� N- � a c� u, � w rn a rr N• � � m n w w w m � w co � w m � � � o N a � rr fi m ►� n a o ro � a ►-� �-r n r a +� u� �n a. � ro �e �. �a n o► o a a to �r �- m �+, r �C a w o a n a� m tr 3 r fi �* m �n b � w n a E �r n � N- r• a► �t ►-• � b x � G o fi d c o � �- w �-e a x � r rr a u� n � a fi r- 't3 'r1 cD m �� t-� cr rt � w N m c�r ►C �C �t o rr p� �n � r � N � �v cu us � o ./� � �y m�/� n fi o M ro �r^ ��a roy am �.^ �a r,^* 1�. O r � � � � Y/ V V/ � � O W V/ �� � •] \Y V. Y. `" �-S Ai N Sv tu F�• rt� � fD (D H � r• tT � tA � }-'• ►i F� • � d cr cr �-n a n � w w �- n m �u �n � � a a a �• �+, r a w � w y �• � u� rn � y w m �• �n ��, fi o N• C Q' cc �' a � � rn m £ y a rt � cn C Q. fi y a� � tr � ro w � a �s a �► cn m � n► o �a � � �• o � a n � �r a r � o �+ ►� � ¢. �• � � v� ►� � � cu �- o w O ct t-• 'C 7�' �n n N• � tn � • �' r� m tn n O O (D � fl m ►� . c� w - w � - � � o Ct N• M n► � ro �* m o ►... �„ � �+, n a a �n a+ � a a m m � o m �* � � m �n �• o o � m � � � w � u, h a ° a' � � ►< �. �r � � a � � o � �o �► v� a �n ro � a G � a � �• �c �* r* w w � ro o w �, � a � �r a � n w � � �+ � � o a d o E n a m w - � • a a � cr m K a � a � � w � w cu a � n ro rt �n h a cu n w N• �n � N ►� o v► a n cr �p N• � rt rt �n a � su cn � u� �r rn cn a m m � o a �a a ►-� ►d �n a ro w �• n v� � o N � �C +� � A. � w w rn 4. K � �' r• o fi cu a • a ro ro N- a m � �s co �• �• w cu o c � � � w w rn E a a. �r cm m � � � � m C fi � N• c► c* a n n cn � +s �• � � w.a �* �+ �c • a. �n c � rr cr a a. � a► � c+ o� �n o a w • �n a . . p cr N � fi A+ � r � t7' ►i (D rr i-h ct N � O. t,n x O �• O t'• fD �' ? 1�+• G m G N £ c'!' p. A1 �"h O H � �ti �"t � N N �' � � � G Cr' E n n � c�D su �r ►c - �• ro m a m m � U1 N �P � 1 � 2 3 4 05:12 5 6 7 8 9 05:Z2 10 11 12 13 � 14 05:I3 15 16 17 18 19 05:13 20 21 22 23 24 �05:13 25 "Currently, my 17-year-old is going to Cathedrai City High Schoo]. and she states that they walk through the hallways like sardines in a can. Thousand Palms is a wonderful community with concerned families who need and deserve a high school that is comfortable and safe without overcrowding. They aren't to be judged by how much money they have." And I won't say the rest. But thank you very much. And please reconsider this because it's very important because we, as parents -- and, like I said, we have 233 signatures -- are very concerned about this, and Z feel sorry for the nther peopl� -- MR. GARCIA: Ms. Gardner, your tirne is up. We can take your letter, it you like. Andrew Green. MR. GREEN: I'm one of the other board members and I would prefer to wait. MR. GARCIA: Okay. Mr. Myers? MR. MYERS: Good afternoon. My name is Randy Myers. I reside at 3640I Sandsol Circle in Rancho Mirage. My wife and I are raising three kids at the moment. One is 8-- 12 and 14. Next year we'11 have Fsquire Deposition Services �14.834.1571 48 1 � 2 3 4 05:14 5 6 7 8 9 45:14 10 ii 12 13 * 14 05:14 15 16 17 18 19 05:14 20 21 22 23 24 �05:15 25 three kids in three different schools. The idea that we will be able to attend -- one of our kids will be able to attend these new schoois, if they happen, is not on our mind. �t's the future and that is what this is set upon. I feel sorry for people to go through what we have gone through and everybody else in the communities that are on the fringes of school districts, but that's what happens when you're on the fringe, you have to go to one or the other. I think the boundaries were well thought out in 1994 and they were there for several different reasons. They were there because there was foresight in the planning department to recoqnize where areas would be built in the desert and when they would be built in the desert. And T think the timing is excellent and the schools, if we could change the boundaries now and get the people at Kaufman and Broad to be able to go to Desert Sands Schoal District so they only have to drive a block, that would be wonderful. But the whole idea is the future, that's not today. My kids probably won't be able to attend any of these schools, my 8-year-old might be able to, but the point is the future and the future needs the schools for Desert Sands in that location. Thank you. Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 49 1 � 2 3 4 05:15 5 6 7 8 9 05:15 10 11 12 13 . 14 05:16 15 16 17 18 19 05:16 20 21 22 23 24 �05:16 25 MR. GARCIA: Vicki Jones. MS. JONES: My name is Vicki Jones, and my address is 32354 Hopi Circle, Thousand Palms. And listening to everyane, you've just got to ask yourself what is the reason why we are here. Is it ior money or education? And that's the key, the children, not where we iive, not who has got what money. The matter of the fact remains that this was land that was reserved primarily for Palm Springs Unified and being on the board last year, attending the district meetings, it has now changed. Why, I don't know, and I find it pretty outrageous to hear others stating well, if I lived over here, will I have an understanding for that and compassion for those. If you live in an area and it is a distance for you, I can understand that that, being that we have also had our problems with other areas and children attending other schools, I fully understand that. What it is we need to understand that this is qoing for the chiidren, not for the parents, for the children and making sure they get their education. It is very, very full where they are currently at right now, at Thousand Palms, Rancho Mirage. All the areas are fully overloaded and, as far as T'm concerned, there needs to be dire straights for another school so the Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 50 � � i children can attend and have adequate education without 2 being cramped up in the school with one teacher. 3 There is so much that I want to say, yet we can 4 05:16 5 6 7 8 9 05:17 10 have all the time we want, it will never, regardless of what it is, it's up to, ultimately, the people to make that decision. And I can only just ask that every thought be �aken into consideration for the families who are here opposing it, that it will be considered and taken into granted (sic) as to why you can see our point of view. It is a distance for us, and we understand 11 that if we live in Palm Desert -- it's a wonderful 12 place, no doubt -- but this is where we live out and 13 this Thousand Palms, and it�s primar�ly for the � 14 children. 05:17 15 16 17 18 I9 05:17 20 21 22 23 24 �05: 18 25 Thank you for your time. MR. GARCIA: Katherine MacLennan. MS. MACLENNAN: Good afternoon. Katherine MacLennan, 69795 Via del Sur, Gathedral City. I'm here to speak in opposition o� this transfer. At this time my children are 7 and 5-- sorry -- and they will both attend Rancho Mirage Elementary. As I look toward their educational future, I was very excited to know that they would be able ta attend two new schools in middle school and high school and maybe avoid some of the overcrowding that is currently -- that's occurring at the current 51 Fsquire Depositioa Services 714.834.1571 1 time in CathedraZ City schools, middle school and high � 2 school. 3 Already, my -- in kindergarten, my daughter 4 already experienced overcrawding in her kindergarten 05:18 5 class of 36 and is safe now from first through third 6 grade with the 20 to � limit. But, again, as she goes 7 through school, seeing a future of overcrowding is not 8 encouraging. And I understand wanting your children to 9 attend a neighborhaod school. S live in Cathedral City 05:19 20 now and my children are attending Rancho Mirage schools, 12 and so already I'm crossing city limits to take my 12 children to school and i don't see that this will be 13 detrimental to them socially or educationally. The � 14 thing that concerns me the most is the overcrowding. So 05:19 15 please take this in�o consideration and understand that 16 overcrowding is really an issue that affects more 17 children. 18 Thank you. 19 MR. GARCIA: Sam Rodriguez. 05:19 20 MR. RODRIGUEZ: Sam Rodriguez. I live at 40804 21 Avenida Calafia, Palm Desert. 22 I'm speaking mainly as a taxpayer, grandparent 23 who -- we live in Pa1m Desert. And my thinq is that 24 Palm Springs vo�ed for bonds for future schools. I �05:20 25 voted with the Desert Sands Unified School District for 52 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 � 05:20 5 6 7 8 9 05:20 10 11 12 13 � 14 05:21 15 16 17 18 19 05:21 20 21 22 23 24 �05:21 25 their bonds because they needed to build schools, but yet now they are telling us that okay, now we want this piece of land over here, but yet that wasn't in the original plan that I voted for. So my question is where is that money going to come �rom for three new schools in that area? Am T i 2 3 4 going to have to vote for another bond issue? You know, as a taxpayer, you know, my taxes are going up every year. That's my main concern is the plan is there, Palm Springs serves their future. If Desert Sands Unified would have Iooked ahead and said let's vote for these bonds, but hey, guys, we're also qoing to get this other land so we should have voted for more, but we didn't and we didn't know that, and I really don't like something being sprung on me new, saying we could have voted for more money, guys. And if this area is moved over to Desert Sands, probab�y they wouldn't fit, they would be more overcrowded just as Palm Springs. Carter would be overcrowded, you'd have to put more portables in there and the middle schoals would be overcrowded with this community coming in because these schools wouldn't be built for two or three years, like Palm Springs has their plan, well in two �r three years we'l1 have these schools. But if we move them right now, where are a11 Fsquire Deposition Services '714'834.1571 53 1 � 2 3 4 05:21 5 b 7 8 9 Q5:22 10 11 12 13 � 14 05:22 15 16 17 18 19 OS:22 20 21 22 23 24 �05:23 25 these kids going to? I don't know. Bring in more trailers, that's not right. A school is a community, and if the ka.ds come from more than two miles, three miles away, then it is our job as parents to build that schooi community. And then if we live in the city, then, hey, that's great, let's participate in those community activities in that city. So schools are schools, they have their own community; cities are cities, they have their own community, sense of community. The biggest thinq I�m worried about is the racial ethnic segregati.on. I think if we allow this to go over to Desert Sands, it's goinq to create that. Whereas Palm Springs, I think is more diversified and we are going to get more diversified in that ares, so my thing is I do not want to see that happen. I do not want to see this committee just totally undiversified, if there is such a word. i like the diversity that Palm Springs has, and I'm afraid that we will not have it if this area gaes over to Desert Sands Onified. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Andrew Green. MR. GREEN: I'm Andrew Green. I live at 2004 East Calle Lileta, Palm Springs. I'm also a board Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 54 1 � 2 3 4 05:23 5 6 7 8 9 05:23 10 1i 12 13 � 14 45:23 15 16 I7 is 19 20 21 22 23 24 �05:24 25 member of PaZm Springs Unified. And all I can do is to add my sincere concern with this pZan to transfer land from Palm Springs Unified to Desert Sands Unified. The school districts are both good school districts, but we have been doing this planning for some time. We have the money online to build the schools, they don�t have the money on].ine to bui].d the schools, so they perhaps will not be able to use their bond money to do that. • The parents are very concerned about immediate things, but the parents who are not even Iiving there yet will have a very -- will have a worse situation to deal with if this transfer �akes place without the proper pZanning that has already been done by Palm Springs Unified. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Thank you. Meredy Shoenberger. (Discussion off the record.) MR. GARCIA: This is the last opportunity because there are no more slips up here. (Discussion off the record.) MR. GARCIA: I did call a Sherwin. Tim Sherwin, I apolagize for that the old cite. MR. SHERWIN: Well, after all that, I'd better Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 55 1 � 2 3 4 05:25 5 6 7 8 9 05:25 10 11 12 13 S14 05:25 15 16 17 18 19 05:25 20 21 22 23 24 .05:25 25 be good, then, shouldn't I? My name is Gary Sherwin, I'm at -- my residence is 26 Scarborough Way in Rancho Mirage. I'm the vice president of the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention, a Visitors Authority, and also the chairman of the Rancho Mirage Parks Cammission. I'm here speaking as apparent, however, and of two wrong children, one age 5 and one age 9. My 9-year-o1d goes to Rancho Mirage Elementary. The reason I mentioned my professional affiliation is my career has offered me some interesting insights into the City of Rancho Mirage and how it is changing so dramatically. The City af Ranch Mirage -- which only has an elementary school, does not have a middle school nor does it have a high school --- is a very different community today than it was ten years ago. It was a community, at one point, of retirees, wealthy people and vacation homes. That was changed just within the last five years. If you go down one of the major corridors of the City of Ranch Mirage, which is Gerald Ford drive, there are no less than fa.ve major new developments under way. These are not homes for multi-millionaires. Some of the homes start at 200,000, some of them go up to 6-, 700,040. It is a very Fsquire Deposidon Services 714.834.1571 56 1 � 2 3 4 05:26 5 6 7 8 9 05:26 10 11 12 13 � 14 05:26 15 16 17 18 19 05:27 20 21 22 23 24 �05:27 25 different community. Up just north of that, at Dina Shore Drive, there are more homes that are also slated to be built that will be single-family primary residences that will attract young children. Furthermore, as far as the city is concerned, there is a new park that will be built at the corner of Monterey and Dina Shore, just about less than a mile from where this school site is. This park is being developed with children in mind becau5e thEq understand that in this corridor of Rancho Mirage, these are going to be primary families living in this community. There was a great deal of thought when these two school districts laid out the boundaries. We would encourage you to stay with the vision, because the vision coming through; there a�e famiJ.ies moving here and we would hope that you wi1Z deny this request. Thank you very much. MR. GARCIA: T'm going to recogni2e -- you've had an opportunity to speak. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: I know, but I need to respond. Ten seconds. MR. GARCIA: No, we are going to give you an opportunity at our next session. Mrs. Shoenberger. Esquise Deposition Services 714.834.1571 57 1 � 2 3 4 05:27 5 6 7 8 9 05:27 10 11 12 13 � 14 05:28 i5 Ib 27 18 19 05:28 20 21 22 23 24 �05:28 25 MS. SHOENBERGER: I guess I can't avvid i� this time. Meredy Shoenberger, I'm a member of the Board of Education Palm Springs Unified. You all know how our board feels an this because you have with you, I believe, a resolution that we passed in opposition to this measure. I think that it can be demonstrated that it wi11 have a negative educational impact on our students, that it will have a negative fiscal impact on both aur parents and our taxpayers who may or may not have students in our district, that it will promote racial imbalance. I think that the nine things that need to be proven, I think �hat we can prove, and T think tha� our parents have spoken well. And I hope you take that into consideration and I�11 1p01t forward ta our next meeting. Thanks. MR. GARCIA: I would just like to give an overview -- ma'am, we are out of time because we are having to reconvene in about an haur and a half in Palm Springs. I'd just like to give an overview in terms of what the proceeda.ngs were this afternoon. And I apologize for not doing this, but because of the weather and some of our board members not getting here on time, Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 58 � 1 we wanted to get started. 2 The chief petitioners for the City of Palm 3 4 05:28 5 Desert originally brought this resolution requesting transfer of the territory from Palm Springs Unified School District to Desert Sands Unified School District 6 to the county committee. The county committee on 7 February 20th, 2002 voted to grant this transfer of 8 territory. A public hearinq regarding this petition 9 mandated by Educational Cade Section 35705 was held -- 05:29 10 part oE it is being held at this time at 4:04 and the � 11 next part of our public hearing will be held at 7:30 at 12 the Palm Springs Unified Schoal District boardroom. 13 The county cammittee that you see before you 14 this afternoon has 12Q days from the date of this public hearing un�il August 13th, 2002, to grant or deny the proposed territory transfer. In making this decision to 05:29 15 16 17 approve or disapprove the petition, the county committee 18 must determine the following conditions regarding the 19 petition are substantially met. Educational code 05:29 20 21 22 section 35709, 35710. There are nine conditions that the committee must consider. The first condition is that the new districts 23 will be adequate in terms of numbers of pupils enrolled. 24 The second condition, the districts are each �5:29 25 organized on the basis of substantial community 59 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 05:30 5 6 7 S 9 05:34 10 11 12 13 � 19 05:30 15 16 17 18 19 05:30 20 21 22 23 24 �05:30 25 identity. The third condition. The proposal will result in an equitable division of property and facilities of the original district or districts. The fourth condition. The reorganization of the district will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation. The fifth condition. The proposed reorganization will not result in any substantial. increase in costs to the state. Condition No. 6. The proposed reorganization will not significantly disrupt the educational programs in the proposed districts and districts effected by the proposed reorganization and will continue to promote sounded educational performance in those districts. Condition No. 7. The proposed reorganization will not result in a significant increase in school housing costs. Condition No. 8, the proposed reorganization is not primarily designed to result in a significant increase in property values causing financial advantaqe to property owners because territory was transferred from one school district to an adjoining school district. Condition No. 9. The proposed reorganization Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 60 1 � 2 3 4 05:31 5 6 7 8 9 05:31 10 11 12 13 � 14 05:31 15 16 17 18 19 Q5:32 20 21 22 23 24 �05:32 25 will not cause a significant negative affect on the fiscal management or fiscal status of the proposed district or existing districts affected by the proposed reorganization. So today, this evening, this committee will not take any action. The input that's being provided to us both as from the groups and organizations of the two respected school. districts and you as individuals is being taken into account. After we have our second pub].ic hearinq tonight at Palm Springs Unified School District, the staff or Riverside County Office of Education will do a research and will also present to this committee the recommendations as outlined according to each af these nine points. So for you in the audience that heard views expressed tonight that were not in favor of the ones that you were in �avor of, you will have an opportunity to have a rebuttaZ, if you like, to make a presentation at Palm Springs School District when this committee reconvenes at 7:30 at the Palm Springs Unified Schooi District boardroom at 980 East Tahqui�z Canyan Way, Palm Springs, California. At this time, the committee is now gning to adjourn. We are going to recess until we reconvene. Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 61 � 1 � 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 � . 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify: That the foreqoing proceedinqs were taken before me at the time and place herein set forth; that any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to testifying, were placed under oath; that a verbatim record of the proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; further, that the foregoing is an accurate transcription thereof. I further certify that I am neither financially interested in the action nor a relative or employee of any attorney o� any of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date subscribed my name. �atecl: JUN 1 � 20Q2 21 r 2 2 '� . r ,� -='-� .��� 23 SUZAI�lQ'E � �tI FDLLOW CSR No. 565 24 25 Z � 2 3 4 S 6 7 $ 9 i0 11 � 21 22 23 24 izs I, the undersigned, a Certified 5horthand Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify: That the foregoing proceedings were taken before me at the time and place herein set forth; that any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to testifying, were placed under oath; tihat a verbatim record of the proceedinqs was made by me using machine shorthand which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; further, that the foregoing is an accurate transcription thereof. I further certify that I am neither financially interested in the action nor a relative or employee of any attorney of any of the parties. IN WITNESS WHERE�F, I have this date 12 13 14 15 subscribed my name. 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: �uN � 1 � i' �� i� l f r � � l.'��--C.J SUZAI�E RI�GFEZLOW CSR No. 565¢�,� CHANGES/CORRECTiONS � � Page/iine � From � To � � � Witness signature Date ATTACHMENT 25 � RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON SCHOOL DISTRICT ORGANZZATiON; PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING, ) } � � } j CERTIFIED coPY � TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS Palm Springs, California Monday, April 15, 2002 Reported by: � SUZANNE STRINGFELLOW CSR No. 5652 JOB No. 599724B 210Q N. Broadway • Second F{oor • Santa Ana, CA 92706 714.834.1571 • Fax 7I4.834.4235 • 800.888.6949 � � � 1 2 3 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMITTEE ON SCHOOL DISTRICT 5 ORGANIZATION; PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 6 PUBLIC HEARING, 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 lb 17 1$ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ) ) ) ) � � Transcript of proceedings, taken at Palm Springs Unified School District, 984 East Tahquit2 Canyon Way, Palm Springs, California, beginning at 7:42 p.m. and ending at 9:28 p.m., on Monday, April 15, 2002, betore SUZANNE STRINGFELLOW, Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 5652. � Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 � I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 il � 12 13 � 14 I5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APPEARANCES: Committee Members: BARRY BUSCH CYNTHIA CLARK RENE GARCIA JOAN HOLLINGSWORTH CHARLOTTE JONES DAVID KASON R4BERT MAINIERO ROBERT O'DONNELL KENNETH RAY SHAREN TOPHAM Business Advisory Services Manager JOCK FISCHER Assistant Superintendent of Schools BOWIE ARNESON, WILES & GIANNONE BY: ALEXANDER BOWIE 4920 Campus Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 (949) 644-8068 �j Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 47:42 5 s 7 8 9 07:42 10 11 12 13 � 14 07:43 15 16 17 18 19 07:43 20 2i 22 23 24 �07:43 25 Palm Springs, California, Manday, April 15, 2002 7:42 p.m. - 9:28 p.m. MR. GARCIA: The meeting will came to order. At this time, I'd like to ask if Mr. Robert O'Donnell to can lead us in the pledge of allegiance (Pledge of Allegiance.} MR. GARCIA: This public hearing is being reconvened. It originally started at Desert Sands Unified School District and we recessed to reconvene here at the Palm Springs Unified Schdol bistrict office. This is a publa.c meeting called by the Riverside County cornmittee on school district organization, and at this time, I'd like to ask Ms. Sharen Topham to have a roll call of the members of the committee. MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Ray. MR. RAY: Present. MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Johnson. Mr. Xason. MR. KASON: Here. MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Sepu].veda. Mr. O'Donnell. MR. O'DONNELL: Present. MS. TOPHAM: Mrs. Jones. MS. JONES: Present. Esquire Deposition Services '714'834.1571 4 1 � 2 3 4 07:43 5 6 7 8 9 07:43 10 11 12 13 � 14 07:43 15 16 17 18 19 07:44 20 21 22 23 24 �07:44 25 MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Garcia. MR. GARCIA: Here. MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Mainiero. MR. MAINIERQ: Here. MS. TOPHAM: Mrs. Clark. MS. CLARK: Here. MS. TOPHAM: Mr. Busch. Mrs. Hollingsworth. MS. HOLLINGSWORTH: Here. MR. GARCIA: Ms. Topham, would you introduce the staff inembers from the county office of education. MS. TOPHAM: To my right is Bud Miller, your legal counsel for this evening. In the front row, keeping time this evening, is Dr. Fischer, the assis�ant superintendent at the county office. In the back is Mike Winters, the consultant from Caldwell Flores Winters, who will be providing a study for this transfer. To my right is Mr. Kim Trampas from the audiovisual department at the county office, and in the back is Mrs. Nancy McCa11 from audiovisual, and they are providing the audiotaping €or us this evening. MR. GARCIA: Thank you. The purpose of the public hearing is to gain input £rom the community on the proposal to transfer territory from the Palm Springs Unified School District Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 5 1 to Desert Sands Unified School District, Monterey at � 2 Frank Sinatra Drive. 3 At this time, I'm going to provide you with a 4 overview of the proposal. The county superintendent of 07:44 5 �, u schools received a resolution signed by a majority of the members of the city council, city of Palm Desert. 7 This petition requests a transfer of a uninhabited 8 territory from the Palm Springs Unified School District 9 to Desert Sands Unified School District. 07:44 10 11 12 13 � 14 47:45 15 16 17 18 19 07:45 20 21 22 23 24 �07:45 25 The territory proposed for transfer is approximately 2200 hundred acres of land. It i.s a7.1 that certaS.n real property bounded on the west by the center line on Monterey Avenue, on the south by the center line of Frank Sinatra Drive and the northeast by the southwest right away of the Union Paci£ic Railroad located next to Interstate 10. The chief petitioners are the city council, city of Palm Desert, originally brought this resolution requesting a transfer of territory from Palm Springs Unified School District to the Desert Sands Uni€ied School District ta the county committee. The county committee on February 20th, 2002 voted to tentatively qrant this transfer of terri�ory. A public hearing regarding this petition is mandated by Educational Code Section 35705, which is 6 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 07:45 5 6 7 8 9 07:46 10 il 12 13 � 14 07:46 15 16 1? 18 19 07:46 20 2Z 22 23 24 �07:46 25 being held at this time. The county committee has 120 days from the date of the public hearing or until August 13th, 2002 to grant or deny the proposed territory transfer. In making this decision to approve or disapprove the petition, the county committee must determine whether the following conditions regarding the petition are substantially met. According to Educational Cade Section 35709, 35710, the following conditions are read as follows: Condition No. 1. The new districts must be adequate in terms of numbers af pupils enrolled. Condition No. 2. The districts are each organized on the basis of substantial community identity. Condition No. 3. The proposal will result in an equitable divisian of property in the f acilities of the original district or districts. Condition No. 4. The reorganization of the districts will not promote raca.al or ethnic discrimination or segregation. Condition No. 5. The proposed reorganization will not result in any substantial increase in cross to the state. Condition No. 6. The proposed reorganization Esquire Depositioa Services 714.834.1571 7 1 � 2 3 � 07:47 5 6 7 8 9 07:47 10 11 12 13 � 14 47:47 15 16 17 ia 19 07:47 20 21 22 23 24 �07:48 25 will not significantly disrupt the educational programs in the proposed districts and districts affected by th� proposed reorganization will continue to pramote sound educational performance in those districts. Condition No. 7. The proposed reorganization will not result in a significant increase in school housing costs. Candition No. 8. The proposed reorganization is primarily designed to result in a significant increase in property values causing financial advantage to property owners because the territory was transferred from one school district to an adjoining school district. Condition No. 9. The proposed reorganization will not cause a substantial negative effect on the fiscal management or fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization. The ground rules for the pub].ic hearing tonight are as such. We are going to have statements by the petitioner who has brought this petition before this committee. The petitioner, the organization at this time, is going to be the city of Palm Desert. They will allocated up to 20 minutes if sa desired. The opponents of the transfer will be allotted Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 � 1 � 2 3 4 07:48 5 6 7 $ 9 07:48 10 11 12 13 � 14 07:48 15 16 17 18 19 07:49 20 21 22 23 24 �07:49 25 a period of about 20 minutes as well. Soth sides, same of yau have fiZled out this -- these blue slips identifying whether you are against ar for the petition, and we are going to try to do the best to our abila.ty to recoqnize you in terms of individuals in an alphabetical order. I would like ta also, following the group presentations, both the petitioner and the opponent af the petition, we will open public input for those individuals who have filled out a blue slip and each individual presented will be allowed the maximum of three minutes. The ane thing I also have to take into account is that when you hear a view expressed by the other side, whether you are against or for the petition, 1 am not going to recognize you a second time. The purpose of tonight's public input is to give equal time to each side. We will not conduct a debate at this site. The petitioner at this time -- Ms. Tapham, would you like ta read that for me? MS. TOPHAM: The order of the speakers has been reversed for the second portion of the public hearing. We will begin with statements by opponents to the transfer, 20 minu�es total far the presentation. And then there will be statements by proponents of the EscJuire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 9 1 � 2 3 4 07:49 5 6 7 8 9 o�:so ia 11 12 13 � 14 07:50 I5 16 17 is 19 07:50 20 21 22 23 29 �07:50 25 transfer, 20 minutes total. Then there wi11 public input by opponents, 3 minutes each, for a 3d-minute total, and then public input by proponents, 3 minutes each, for a 30-minute total. MR. GARCIA: I'd like to recognize Mr. Don Aikens, president of the Palm Springs Unified School District. MR. AIKENS: Thank you. I'm Don Aikens, president of the Palm Springs Unified School District Board of Education, I'm also president of the Riverside County's school board's associatian. At this time, I'd iike td introduce my other fellow board members. Would you please stand up. Sherry Stewart, Father Andrew Green, Meredy Shaenberger and Mike McCabe. We are all five here. Thank you. I would like to go through some of the history of transfers that have qone on between these two districts. The area was reviewed along with four other parcels for transfer beginning in the late 1994. Four of the areas were to go from the Palm Sprinqs Unified School District to Desert Sands Unified School District, and one area was to go from Desert Sands to Palm Springs. The final outcome of that came about this way, Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 10 1 � 2 3 4 07:51 5 6 7 8 9 07:51 10 three parcels went to Desert Sands Unified School District: The Big Horn development, which is 2250 acres was one, Sun City Palm Springs which was 540 acres in the western portion, and a third area approved was a very small area to align district boundaries which was less than 20 acres. The Clancy Lane portion of Rancho Mirage that was to go to the Palm Springs Unified School District was dropped and did not happen. Monterey and Frank Sinatra transfer area was denied to qo to the Desert Sands Unified SchooZ District 12 in 1994 because of the negative impact on the Palm 12 Springs Unified School District. 13 In 1998, a petition by homeowners in the � 14 xaufman and Broad was legally fauZty and therefore the 07:51 15 petition was returned to the homeowners by the county. 16 State regulations changed in January 1, 200I to allow 17 cities to petition for territory transfers. Petition to 18 transfer the area to the Desert Sands Unified School 19 District from the city of Palm Desert occurred in 07:52 20 December 2001. As you see, the petition isn't fair to 21 most students and isn't fair to most parents. At this 22 time, I'd like to turn it over ta superintendent 23 Dr. Diedrich. 24 .07:52 25 DR. DIEDRICH: Thank you, Mr. Aikens. I'm not going to spend a lot of time reviewing 11 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 � 1 what I've already said to you. At 4:00 we had that 2 opportunity. I do want to expand just a little bit on a 3 few items there. You're going to hear tonight from 4 parents who live in that area and they feel very 07:52 5 passionately abaut their children being able to go to 6 school near their homes. we support that. In fact, we 7 planned for that eventuality, that we would put schools 8 in that area so those children would have an opportunity 9 to go to school within walking distance of their home. 07:52 1Q And that, ladies and gentlemen, strikes to the heart of 11 what we are going to be talking about, and that's long 12 13 � 14 07:53 1S 16 I7 18 19 07:53 20 21 22 23 24 �07:53 25 range planning. The city of Palm Desert has come forward with this petition. To the best of our knowledge, they haven't discussed it with us. I don't know what they have done with the Desert Sands Unified School District, but I can tell you when you're planning for schools, and many of you are school board members, just don't just drop a petition on somebody and say "Make that happen." It takes years and years of planning in order to take into consideration the numbers of students that you're going to meet the needs of, and the Palm Springs Unified School District has done that. In fact, it isn't just the Palm Springs district, and I want to make that very clear. Earlier, 12 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 07:53 5 6 7 8 9 07:54 10 11 12 13 � 14 07:54 15 26 17 18 29 07:54 20 2T 22 23 24 �07:54 25 we are heard comments about it's Palm Springs. It isn't Palm Springs, it's Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Thousand Palms, Rancho Mirage and part of Palm Desert -- and part of Desert Hot Springs, as well. All of our districts, areas there, are included our long ranqe planning when we determine to build schools. When we had the issue in 1994, there was a tacit agreement among the boards that we tried to align the boundaries. And at that time we could go forward and make some plans for our schools. I believe both districts did that. And I want to say at the outset that we have no issue with the Desert Sands Unified School District, I think you'll find they have excellent schools and I think we do as well. So it's not about quality of education, in our view, it's about planning. Earlier today, you heard that their board of educatian made a statement that they would support this, but they would like to reserve the right to see how that plays out from a financial standpoint. That is sound, solid, in my view, prudent thinking. They need to make that determination as to whether they can meet the needs af these kids. In fact, I feel so strongZy about that, 1 can tell you proudly, we planned for that two, three years ago. When we developed our bond issue and presented Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 13 � 1 � 2 3 4 07:54 5 6 7 8 9 07:55 10 lI 12 13 � 14 07:55 15 16 17 18 19 07:55 20 21 22 23 24 �07:55 25 that to voters, we had at that mind, and still do, two schools in that area to serve the children. And so when the parents say I want our children ta be able to continue where they are, that, in my view, is looking at the present. We are looking down the road when the rest of that area is developed. We have plans to meet those school needs. But, in addition to that, it has a tremendous impact on the rest of the district, because you can't plan on simply one area in order to do a1Z your facilities planning. I don't need to te].1 you this, you've been involved in that. If you're involved in Hemet, Riverside, all those areas, you knaw what I'm talking about, we make those long range plans. And when we did that, we saw a way that we could alleviate the crowded conditions at Cathedral City High School, which currently is running around 22,000 students, 25,000 students -- 25, excuse me -- 2500 students, excuse me. We have 22,040 students in our district. We would like to avoid 22,000 at the school, but it doesn't appear -- MR. GARCIA: That's duly noted in your record. DR. DIEDRICH: Sometimes it feels that way, I must tell you. When we developed our plan, we were looking at Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 14 1 � Z 3 4 07:56 5 6 7 8 9 07:56 10 11 12 13 � 14 07:56 15 16 Z7 18 i� 07:56 20 21 22 23 24 .07:56 25 a way to alleviate the crowded conditions at Cathedral City High School; you're going to hear about this tonight. We have extremely crowded conditions there, and if we don't do anything about it, it's going to have a negative impact. It's also going to have an effect on Nelly N. Coffman, James Workman, students that are attending schools in Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms; you heard some of that earlier. What we are saying is we have gone through the steps of planning for this, we have gane through the steps of developing a Zong range plan to meet the needs of the children, not just within that area. And, believe me, we are not insensitive to the comments made those by parents that would like their children to continue in that area. We want them, as w�ll, but we want them to be able to go to a school that's even closer that be the ones they are going to now. You�re also going to hear from the city of Palm Desert that they would like their school to be served by only one district. As I look around the members af this committee, I think you're going to have some sense of what I�m talking about, when I say that you all or many of you represent cities or school districts that are servicing more than just one city. And i€ you carry that to its logical conclusion, as it was pointed out Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 ]� 1 � 2 3 4 07:57 5 6 7 8 9 07:57 10 11 12 13 � 14 07:57 15 26 17 18 19 07:57 20 zi 22 23 24 �07:58 25 earlier, you're going to have a very busy time, if we're going to try and take and make sure only one city is served by one district. It just daesn't happen; it's a rarity when it does. And we'd like you to give that some consideration. And So, in conclusion, I just want to say that this isn�t about one smali area. And we are sensitive to that area and we consider that to be part of our district and are meeting their neecis and have plans to do that. But it's about 22,000 kids and what the schooli.ng is going to be like for those young people and how we can best provide services. We wauld like to qive -- I'd like to have you consider that as you deliberate this matter and urge yaur opposition to this transfer. Thank you. And now I'd like to introduce Alex Bowie. MR. BOWIE: Thank you very much. It's nice to have this opportunity �his evening, as welJ. as earlier in the day. For your record, my name is Alex Bowie, I'm an attorney with Bowie, Arneson, and I'm here this evening on behalf of the Palm Springs Unified School District. Just as a housekeeping item, there's an update on the report that was previously distributed to the Esquire Deposidon Services 714.834.1571 1b 1 • 2 3 4 07:58 5 6 7 8 9 07:58 10 11 12 13 . 14 07:58 15 16 17 18 19 07:59 20 21 22 23 24 �7:59 25 committee. Th�s is entitled "Evaluation of Compliance of Resolution af City of Palm Desert" in regard to the criteria that have been mentioned to you, and this is dated April 15th, so maybe this would go properly to -- MR. GARCIA: At the conclusion of your comments we will take your comments, thank you. MR. BOWIE: We have given Mike Winters, of Caldweli Flares Winters, a copy, and I think Dwight has a capy here for the city representative as well. We, of course, would want to extend the courtesy of seeing that they have any documents that we furnish to you. I'm just going to briefly touch on some of those items mentioned here, because as I pointed out and many people have commented to you this evening, you have to make an affirmative finding on each of those nine statutory items or you're precluded, as a matter of law, from any approval, even if you were motivated to do that. Now, one of these items we talked about just briefly in February, and i just want to make an introductory comment that what samebody's racial origin is doesn't make them any better wors� or special or nonspecial than anyone else. But ane of these items as to which you must make a finding is that your approval of this proposed transfer will not promote racial or Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 17 0 1 � � ethnic discriminatian or segregation. The statute says that, the constitution of the State of California says 3 that and your actians are viewed as an action of the 4 State of California in this regard. 07:59 5 The material, which we have qiven yau copies of 6 before, given to Mr. Winters and given to the city, of 7 page 7 discusses this in detail, and I'll just kind of 8 shorthand it a little bit. 9 We talked earlier today about the planning area 07:59 10 of Palm Springs Unified School District, that for many 11 years they have been planning to meet the needs of this 12 area. As to that planning area, it is 80 percent 13 minority today. We know that there's a planning area ! 14 for Desert Sands Unified School Dis�rict as to which 08:00 15 this might be transferred, that's 30 percent. 16 If you deny the transfer and this proposed 17 development, which we really haven't talked lot about, 18 is deveZoped in Palm Springs, that 80 percent will go 19 down to 58 percent; it's abaut a 20 percent reductian. 08:00 20 And if you were to approve it, if that were legally 21 permissible, and we respectfully submit that it's not, 22 it's going to stay the same and the 30 percent area will 23 go later. 24 �Q8:00 25 Therefore, the facts are that it is not possible to make the determina�ion that this approval 18 Fsquire Depositioa Services 724.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 08:01 5 will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination. So I respectfully urge that you look at the more detailed documentation in the report that we have submitted, and I think factually you will find, in addition to many other items in those nine items, it is not legally 6 permissible to approve this transfer. 7 In regard to whether or not there will be any 8 increase ta the state, as far as the cost of schools for 9 08:01 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:01 15 16 17 18 19 08:01 20 21 22 these areas, that's another termination that you must make that there will not be. Exhibit �i to this document, you will find that if you were to approve this, if it was legally permissible, that the taxes in the Palm Springs school district per $100,000 will go fram $62 to $83. That's a� difference of $20, times a$300,000 hoine, that would be $60. Do yau really believe that the voters of Palm Springs school district, as they have the last two times, in '92 and Zaoo, would again vote to raise their taxes when decisions like this, contrary to the '94 understanding, was then vitiated by actions by the City of Palm Desert, by this committee, to raise their taxes. I think this would be the last successful bond election 23 we've ever had, and what will happen, the state wi7.Z get 24 �08:02 25 to pick up the tab. Under the provisions of AB-16, which was 19 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 � 1 enacted -- that's your new bond bill -- was enacted in 2 light of the existing SAB regulations, you don't have to 3 have 60 percent, yau don�t have to have a successful 4 election, there are other extenuating circumstances that 08:02 5 will produce hardship. That means the state will pick 6 up the tab. 7 8 9 08:02 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:02 15 16 17 18 19 08:03 20 Separate and apart from what will happen in the Desert Sands area, their taxes will ga up by $35. I'll bet the people that voted that successful bond election in Desert Sands didn't have in mind getting their taxes raised to put schools in the area that wasn't even part of the district at the time that they voted. How many dwelling units are we talkinq about? It`s 3,000 today. The land use proposal the city is talking about will raise it from 3,000 to as much as 8,000 dwelling units in those 2200 acres. That's a lot of houses, a lot of kids, a lot of school facilities. $15,0�0 a house true cost, what, 5,000 more homes, that's $7S million. The school fees are 30. That's also addressed in this report. 21 But trying to move aiong in the limited time 22 that we have, there's another decision. You will not be 23 able to determine that the state can't get stuck. They 24 are not going to -- the voters of this district aren't �08:03 25 going to vote again when they are planning their long 20 � Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 * 2 3 4 08:03 5 6 7 8 9 d8:04 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:04 15 16 i7 18 19 08:04 20 21 22 23 24 �08:04 25 term financial and facilities planning is disrupted. Would there be a disruption, No. 6. You'd have to find there would not be a disruption to the educational activities in this district. There would be delay, because remember we have to give up the sites that we have, and that's what the Rancho Mirage people were so concerned about when they spoke to you this afternoon. There will be portables, there wi11 be costs to bus, the quality of education that's provided will not be possible because of the smaller-sized schools, the cost to operate will be greater and, as we point�d out, the costs of the high school per person will go from $22,000 per student to $36,000 because of the stnaller school population in that high school. And we knaw who will get stuck with that tab, it will be the state. There will be a disruption to the educational programs of this district. Increased housing costs. You would have to make a finding that there would be no increase in the housing costs. But we have detailed there will in fact be. The high school alone goes from 22,000 to $36,000 per student, and then if you're getting 5,000 more dwelling units on top of the 3,400, that's a lot of money. And that question would be where wauld it come f rom . Esqvire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 21 � 1 You must also find that this proposal was not 2 designated to promo�e significant increases in property 3 values. I think you will find that it is. If we take a 4 definite number of acres and crank in another 5,000 08:05 5 dwelling units, that property goes up a great deal. 6 In the Coachella Valley, as was true in the 7 Coachella school district hearings with Desert Sands 8 before the 4,OU0 acre transfer which this committee 9 denied in 1999, it was found that in those areas where 08:05 10 it is predominantly white, the houses sell for a greater 11 amount of money which translated into a greater land 12 13 � 14 08:05 15 16 17 18 19 08:05 20 21 22 23 24 �8:06 25 value and it translates to a much more rapid absorption which again brings to the bottom line enhancing the bottom line of the develaper. So if it's no� about community identity, if it's not about better education, it's not about schaols sooner because they are qoing to be later, assuming you even know where the money is coming from, that's assuming that Desert Sands cauld sell the bonds for this area. We know they can't sell any bonds until their present bonds are paid off, and I wonder who they promised the first money to. 2 doubt it wauld be the areas from the outside. That means those people who had such a sincere story to you this afternoon will qet their schools later 22 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 � 1 if you approve the transfer. The Rancho Mirage people 2 will get the schools later and the costs to the Palm 3 Springs school district, the costs to the State of 4 California will, in fact, go up. 08:06 5 6 7 8 9 08:06 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:06 15 16 17 18 19 08:07 20 21 22 23 24 �8:07 25 You also will have to find that it has not adversely impacted the fiscal management of the Palm Springs school district. You lose planning, you redo the planning, you delay it costs more, smaller schools cost more p�r student, interim portables, and all af these costs will have an impact on the fiscal management of the Palm Springs school district. Then you get done to other, which we talked about earlier, and after listening to everyone this a€ternoon and just having a few minutes to think things over, when you have a complicated issue, as you £olks da, probably one of the easier ways to think about it is what's right. Because if you take all the information you've got and try to think about what's,right, you tend to make a proper decision. Now, what's right? That's to bring schools to this planning area at the earliest possible date at the least possible cost. Now where is that likely to happen? It's by the people who have the planning, they have the money, they have the expertise, they have made the commitments. On the chart this afternoon, you saw the dates when the 23 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � Z 3 9 Q8:07 5 6 7 8 9 08:08 10 11 12 13 � 14 as:oa is 16 17 18 19 08:08 20 21 22 23 24 �08:Q8 25 bands had been sold, will be sold, when construction will start. That's how you will get schools for those people, whether they are Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms or the transfer area, denial of this proposal will bring the schools sooner. That's what's right. That's what we are trying to do. One gentleman said it's long range planning, not big bang for the buck in the nex� minute; that isn't what we are taiking about. What would be the other side of the coin, ox the other piece to the transaction of what's right? MR. GARCIA: Mr. Bowie, we only have two minutes left as far as a group presentation, so we would like for you to close your comments. MR. BC?WIE : Thank you . So what would you do? we really believe when the city annexed the area, they must have told Labco what school district it was in when they zoned it. Their staff reports would have said what school district. Kaufman and Broad, the largest home builder in the United States, do you really think they sold those houses without telling me and signing them off what school district they are in. They may not remember it, but we will see. The final comment I would make is that denying Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 24 1 � 2 3 4 08:08 5 6 7 8 9 08:09 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:09 15 16 1� ia 19 08:09 20 21 22 23 24 �8:Q9 25 this will bring the schools online faster for these peaple and hopefully, as has been stated, that Palm Springs Unified School District has no objection to these people continuing to attend the Desert Sands Unified School District while these schools are being built. So it shouldn't even only be Desert Sands that looks at whether they can afford this or not, I think the people who spoke, plaintively, sincerely, ought to take along hard loak at who has the finances to build those schools, who has the planning, who a.s moving to produce them and who may not be able to produce nickel one in the future. Thank you very much for your courtesy. MR. GARCIA: Mr. Smith. MR. SMITH: Yes. i just want to read into the record. We received this letter from a Ms. Emily Jagel at 37884 Hollister Drive in Pa].m Desert. She wrote it on the back of a letter she received from the City of Palm Desert. It's dated April 8th, 2002. "Hello." Subject of this letter, "School district territory transfer proposal." "We do not wish to change, just leave as it is wi�h Palm Springs Unified School District. Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 25 1 "Thank you. Ms. Emily Jagel." And her � 2 address. 3 MR. GARCIA: Okay. Mr. Andrew Gseen. 4 MR. GREEN: My name is Andrew Green. I live at 08:10 5 2a04 East Caleta, Palm Springs. And my concern is 6 specifically the issue that regards to planning and the 7 increase in taxes to people who have already passed a 8 bond issue to provide schools for this area. 9 As has already been said, it is not about being 08:10 10 insensitive to the immediate needs of parents and 11 children for their -- the next two or three years, but 12 it's about long range caring for the needs of aIl of the 13 people who wili be in this district and making sure that � 14 they have the best schools available, we have the 08:11 15 planning already in place to do that, and denying this 16 transfer will make this happen faster for more of these 17 parents. 18 Thank you. 19 MR. GARCIA: Ms. Meredy Shoenberger. 08:11 20 MS. SHOENBERGER: Meredy Shoenberger, member of 21 the Board of Education Palm Springs Unified. I just 22 have one brief thing ta add. And that's that the City 23 of Palm Desert aided us in selecting proposed sites for 24 both these schools, the K-8 school and the high school. �8:11 25 We have also met with personnel from the new Cal State 26 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 � I campus already in this area that we are talking about 2 with the possibility of establishing collaboration 3 between the high school we propose and their university, 4 which would enhance the education of those students, 08:12 5 which can only happen if we can build a larqer and more 6 comprehensive high school. The other things that I 7 indicated to you I will not reiterate. Thank you. 8 MR. GARCIA: Mr. Charles "Bud" England. 9 MR. ENGLAND: Thank you for your time. 48:12 10 il 12 My name is Bud England, I'm a counsel member of Cathedral City but, most importantly, I�m a father to a 19-year-old son and a 10-year-old daughter who both go to Palm Springs Unified School District schools. There are numerous reasons for you to deny the request of the City af Palm Desert and the land transfer 13 � 14 08:12 15 16 to the Desert Sands Unified School District. i'm sure 17 you can debate the pros and the cons and the conditions 18 tor hours. However, it boils town to a few simple 19 08:13 20 21 arguments that need to be keyed on, and how those transfers affect the education of our children and our youth. 22 The other issues are: Providing facilities to 23 reasonably accommodate classroom sizes without the use 24 of portable or temporary units, relief from student OS:I3 25 overcrowding, reasonable share of costs spread across � 27 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 i � 2 3 4 0$:13 5 6 7 8 9 08:13 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:14 15 16 17 18 19 08:14 20 21 22 23 24 �08 : 14 25 the taxpayers, and reasonable performance from our public school systems, our administrations and our teachers. This should not be about school di.stricts or cities acquiescing to developers, disadvantaging one group of students over another, or not allowing students to grow in a healthy, socially diverse and racially balanced climate. As public officials, we should be looking at the different challenges of raising expectations and qraduation rates and academic levels, providing education for an increasingly diverse studEnt populations. If the land transfer were to take place, it would have a devastating ripple effect and disadvantage our children and their parents in the ability to receive the best education Palm Springs Unified School District has to offer. As a counsel member, March -- actually, in April, we sent Riverside County Board of Education a resolution, unanimously approved the resolution that strongly encourages you to deny this land transfer. The city council being a board of elected governinent officials who represent those families in Cathedral City and the children of those families again ask you to deny the proposed land transfer, thank you. Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 28 1 � 2 3 4 08:15 5 6 7 S 9 08:15 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:15 15 16 17 1$ 19 08:15 20 21 22 23 24 �08: 16 25 MR. GARCIA: Mr. William Kleindienst. MR. KLEINDIENST: Good evening, Mr. Chair, members of the committee. Thank you for the opportunity to share my thoughts with you. I can�t help but remind myself of the s�ory o£ Ted Kennedy at the democratic convention. After so many speakers, he was trying to figure aut what to say that would have any interest to the group and he said he felt a lot like Zsa Zsa Gabar's fifth husband. ge knew what he had to do, but he wanted to know how to make it interesting for her. I am a 25-year resident of Palm Springs. I have been involved in the community since I have moved here. T am a father of three. I have dedicated probably 12 of the last I5 years to helping students at Palm Springs High School, from building homecoming floats to creating the homecoming parade, to hel.ping the design of the Palm Springs High Schdol tv work on their graduation. I have done work at the high school well before any of my children went through the school. I have created events that celebrate life in Palm Springs, ranging from the Festival of Lights parade to our now famous Veteran's Day parade. I have just recently returned from a number of events over the weekend and two functions tonight Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 29 1 celebrating students again in the Palm Springs Unified � 2 School District. And aside from all of those things� I 3 do have time to somehow do the job that I have assumed 4 08:16 S 6 7 8 9 08:16 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:i6 15 16 as the mayor of Palm Springs. I share with you the concern that I have. That in this area that we live, there are so many layers of government that overlap and there are so many different jurisdictions that have control and authority over the day-to-day operations of our lives. And for all practical purposes they are seamless, the average person daes nat know, when buys a home in a certain water district, hospital district or school district. They look at the home, like the property and they move in based on the quality of life it offers. People, belief ine, buy homes next to haspitals and then call me and have me stop the ambulances and 17 helicopters from coming in. They buy homes next to the 18 19 08:16 20 21 22 23 park and then stop all the kids and all the lights from happening. They buy homes near downtown and want the noise to go away, the traffic and the crowds; what kind of town could this be? The reality is when someone buys a home, they look at a number of factors; that is the job of the 24 homeowner when they buy it. What we have here is a �08:�7 25 current situation where a school district, an excellent 30 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 08:17 5 6 7 8 9 08:17 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:17 15 16 i� 18 19 08:18 20 zi 22 23 24 �OB:18 2S school district, PSUSD provides excellent services to all the students within its district. We have, as you know, historically, reviewed these lines in the past as early as 1994 and analyzed, I think, this very property in the past. The findings then are very similar to the findings today. We provide, currently, in this school district excelient services and have no reason to believe otherwise. We ask for your support in denying the application. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: At this time, we are going to recognize -- the chair will recognize the proponents af the petition transfer. I'd like to ask Mr. Carlos Ortega, City of Palm Desert, to come forward. MR. ORTEGA: Mr. Chairman, Carlos Ortega, city manaqer for the City of Palm Desert. As the record indicates, the Palm Desert city council is the proponent of this district change. Also with me today is councilman Bob Spiegel, he will also speak. I wouid just like to address a cauple of things that have been said. Number one, you've heard from the folks in Cathedral City and they submitted to you a resolution, and if I can just read the first whereas of their own resolution. It says, "Whereas the residents of the City of Cathedral City is served by one school Esquire Depositian Services 714.834.1571 32 C_� 1 district, the Palm Desert Unified School District." So 2 I don't think that Palm Desert's request is out of line. 3 4 oa:i$ s 6 7 8 9 We agreed, wholeheartedly, with our neighbors. The other thing, the opponents want to make it sound as if all of a sudden everybody is going to have an increase in taxes. Weil, we all remeu�ber Proposition 13 and Proposita.on I3 is very simple. It says, it limited taxes. And it took the taxes that were in effect then and distributed then pursuant to a farmula 08:19 10 ta the school districts, to other districts and to 12 cities. And, since then, school districts in this area 12 receive anywhere from 34 to 38 percent of the taxes. 13 � 14 08:19 15 16 So the only way that your property taxes can increase is by a special vote. And of course you've heard that both Palm Springs and other high school districts have passed valid initiatives, but those have 17 to be passed by a vote of the people, and the people 18 know specifically why is it that they are increasing the 19 taxes, whether it's €or new schools or whatever. 08:19 20 So because the people are in one district ar 21 another -- or rather that the peaple that remain in the 22 Palm Springs Unified School District because they would 23 lose this area. Unless there is a vote of the people, 24 the schools cannot increase the taxes, I just wanted to �08:Z0 25 correct that. 32 Esquire Deposiiion Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 08:20 5 The other thing is I think we have heard that Palm Springs has looked at sites, acquiring sites in Palm Desert, maybe they have acquired some sites in Cathedral city, maybe they have acquired some sites in Rancho Mi.rage, but the fact is that they have not 6 acquired any sites in the area. 7 I think one of the biq issues that everybody 8 9 08:20 1Q 11 talks about is the money. If you transfer the property to Desert Sands Unified School District, all this money is going to be lost. Well, let's keep the relationship between the taxes and services to be provided. Of 12 course the taxes from the new construction will go to 13 the new school district, or rather Desert Sands Unified � 14 School District, but so will the responsibilities. 08:21 15 And it's one thing to say, well, there's 5,000 16 homes, well, yvu know those 5,000 homes and we are sure 17 that when the district's consultant gets through doing 18 its work that he will be able to tell you how many 19 children of whatever ages of whatever ethnicity af 08:21 20 whatever income those 5,Q00 homes or 6,000 homes, 21 whatever the number is will create. But please 22 23 24 �08:21 25 understand that then that will become the responsibility of the Desert Sands Unified School District and therefore we should not be surprised that of course they will get the property taxes and other revenues that come 33 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 08:22 5 6 7 S 9 08:22 10 11 12 13 � 14 0$:22 15 16 17 18 19 08:22 20 21 22 23 24 �8:24 25 from such transfers. So it's not Iike som�body is going to lose territory, but keep the responsibility for serving those children. You've heard today from representatives of the city, and you heard from, many of you, why we think the criteria, both in subsection A and subsection B, are met. We presented evidence to this board in Indio and today that the nine criteria that this -- this board has to consider are made. And of course we are sure that your own consultant, we are in touch with him and we will provide him whatever information that he wants so he can provide you with a report. That report will not be done by the City of Palm Desert, will not be done by either school district, so I�m sure you will have more confidence in that report than you would have if either one of us would prepare it. So it will add�ess those issues, it will address the issues of monies to be transferred, it will address the issues of responsibilities, it will address the issues of ethnicity, it will address the issues of how many children would go to particular grades, and all of that, and we will await that report. Thank you. Now I'd like Councilman Bob Spiegel to make a presentation. Thank you. MR. SPIEGEL: Thank you, Carlos, Chairman, Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 34 1 � 2 3 4 08:24 5 committee members, second time today. First time was short, this will be short too. The high school is going to be built in 2010, hapefuliy. In four years, the Palm Desert Hiqh School will be increased i.n size and remodeled to the tune of $40 million, and that's in the 6 most recent bond issue. A grade schoal is goi.ng to come 7 8 9 08:24 i0 11 12 into the area, hopefully, in four or five years. Right now we are negotiating with Desert Sands ta build a grade school on Country Club, or approximately two miles away from the area that we are talking about, and we will be providing a regional park along with the grade school and the students will be able to use part of the 13 park as a playground during the day and then, at night � 14 and on the weekends, it will be used by the residents. Q8:24 15 16 17 18 19 08:24 20 21 22 23 24 �08:24 25 There are plans in our cities for our schools. We are going to remodel Western Charter school, we are going to remodel Lincoln, we are going to remodel our middle school; in fact, all of our schooZs are going to have upgrades and remodeling, and that comes from the bond issue that passed over well in the entire district. I think it's one thing to say we have got plans and we know where we are going and you guys don't, we do know where we are going and we are going to qet there. And again, I appreciate you initially approving the transfer criteria. 35 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 08:24 5 6 7 8 9 08:25 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:25 15 16 17 18 19 08:25 20 2i 22 23 24 �08:26 25 MR. GARCIA: Mr. Ortega, is there anybody else from the ci.ty? UNIDENTIFIED MAN: If we can maybe rebut some of the things said earlier on. MR. GARCIA: You can make one statement, and that's all we have time for tonight. UNIDENTIFIED MAN: Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Charlene Whitlinger. MS. WHITLINGER: Thank you, again, for this opportunity. I'm going to make a similar statement to the one I made earlier, but for those who were not in attendance at the meeting, I would just like to make this for the record. As you know, we would very much like to support this territory transfer and support the citizenry in this area. Bu�, in iight of the newly proposed general plan amendment to the City of Paim Desert, we would like to rev�ew the fiscal impact on our district. It is good sound fiscal practice to have that opportunity and we are really glad Mr. Winters is preparing that report. Our district has been very fiscally responsible and we too have the expertise to handle the growth in our district, therefore we are looking forward to the report prepared by Mr. Winters and our board of education will Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 3b 1 � 2 3 4 08:26 5 6 7 8 9 08:26 10 il 12 13 � 14 08:26 15 16 17 28 19 08:27 20 21 22 23 24 �08:27 25 review the report upan that and then determine the suppori, they will make a statement regarding the report after we look at the fiscal impact on both districts. So that's all I want to say, so it is short. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Thank you. We have heard the opponents and the proponents as far as the qroup presentation by Palm Springs Unified School District and the proponents, the City of Palm Desert. At this time, the chair will recoqnize individual members from the public that have filled out a speaker's request form. Basically to go over the ground rules, you're going to be allowed a period of time o£ three minutes, and we do have a timekeeper, we have a number of people that wish to make a presentation before this committee. We wzll not recess in terms of going back and allowing a rebuttal to some of the comments. So once you get up here to make your comments, that's the only opportunity you'll have to speak to this committee. I only have one slip up here that doesn't say either for or against, and we don't have an in-between category. Danald Bradley, for or against? MR. BRADLEY: Against. Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 37 1 • 2 3 4 08:27 5 6 7 8 9 08:28 10 11 12 13 � 24 08:28 15 16 17 18 19 08:28 20 21 22 23 24 �08:28 25 MR. GARGIA: Okay. We are going to go in the reverse order that we were at in terms of our earlier meeting at Desert Sands Unified School District. And, Mr. Bradley, you're number one. I� you would come forward and state your name and your address. MR. BRADLEY: My name is Donald Bradley. I'm city manager of the city of Cathedral City. 68700 Lalo Guerrero, Cathedral City. I also live in Cathedral City. Just a few comments. I was at the session this afternoon, I want to compliment the board on the conduct of how you handled a rather volatile issue and I think you're daing a great job. Let me just say, first af all, �his is not about us in any way opposing Palm Desert; they are a fine city, they do an excellent job, I wish our city could do the job they have done. They have done a excellent job of planning for their community and providing for their citizens. Yet this afternoon what we found was that there were citizens on both sides of the issue who spoke rather ardently for or against the issue. we find ourself in the same situation, that Palm Springs Unified School District approached the city, we listened �o the arguments, they made sense, and 38 Esquire Depos+tion Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 as a result we have submitted a resolution of opposition urging you to reject this application. It seems to us that this matter was addressed really in I994. In 1994, the issue was decided based on 08:29 5 various criteria that we know some about but are relying 6 on Palm Springs Unified School District and the 7 presentation they have made to further make that point. 8 9 08:29 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:29 15 16 17 18 19 08:29 20 21 22 23 24 �8:30 25 The point is made about the fact that there are residents now who have to travel one direction or the other. We heard this afternoon, the residents from Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Thausand Palms in particular, that wou�d be impacted if you approved this. I think we need to keep in mind that we need to be careful that we are not -- that we are loaking at a situation where you may have an impact on a neighborhood as opposed to an impact on what could be on several communities . The issue of taxes has been raised and what the impact will be of this matter, and I just want to say that while indeed there is a vote of the peopie that are required for any increase of taxes. That's, in fact, one of the issues is that you now have a bond issue that is in place to be able to build schoals in this area, if you have to go back to the people, you have a whole other round and more delays. And it's the citizens of 39 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 i � 2 3 4 08:30 5 6 7 8 9 U8:3U 1Q lZ 12 13 � 14 08:30 15 16 17 1$ 19 08:31 20 21 22 23 24 ��8:31 25 Cathedral City who are affected now by overcrowding and cauld potentially be affected by much mvre. i think the state of readiness af proceeding with schools is very important, Palm Sprinqs Unified School District has demonstrated they are ready to proceed and we think that's very important and particularZy important to the citizens of Cathedral City. So, with that, I'll conclude, and thank you very much. MR. GARCIA: Mr. Gary Butler. MR. BUTLER: Gary Butler, 37222 Ferber Drive, Rancho Mirage. I'm a homeowner in Rancho Mirage with four children in Palm Springs Unified School District. We talked about what has changed. We look at this -- this was rejected as a transfer in 1994. The big question is what has changed since 1994. The answer, a majar development came in this particular area, xaufman and Broad built 150-plus homes in ihere. There's a lat more development that's taking place right now. I shared my empathy earlier today with the homeowners in Kautman and Broad, if I lived there I would probably be right there where they are at, their same challenges. The fact is we alZ have to make some Fsquire Deposition Services 7I4.834.I571 40 1 # 2 decisions when we get into these situations. As parents of children, we are very passionate, needless to say, 3 about what's best for our children. 4 We just went home shapping this summer to see 08:31 S about different areas. As we did, we contacted Desert 6 Sands Unified School bistrict and asked them to send us 7 8 9 08:31 10 maps of their given schaols. Particularly, we wanted to know where their elementary schools, which ones we wanted to go to, the middle schools as weZl as the high schaols, where are your geographical boundaries so that 11 we know, when we move, we are within the boundary that 12 we want. We have to do that as prudent parents. 13 We are in a situation now that is very � I4 U8:32 15 16 17 I8 19 08:32 20 21 22 23 24 �08:32 25 emotianal here because these people are in an area that they are losing, as they would say, their community identity because other children have gone to other schools, they are all split up throughout. We have to really do our research as parents of the schools that we are sending our children to, do our homework, and really there are issues that we have to face at every school, but we have ta become involved, as parents, which we do. We are now looking at a situation of which school dis�ricts would be in here. Palm Springs Unified has -- had this land since the day the dirt was created, and now we are looking at transferring it. Why? 41 Esqnire Deposition Services ? 14.834.1571 � 1 Because you have got a vocal minority of homeowners that 2 have now moved into this area that can disrupt the 3 4 08:33 5 6 7 8 9 silent majority of all of us that live in Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms, parts of Cathedral City, as well as Palm Desert. So we are just asking to think about the majority and what's best for all of our students as you make this decision. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Carmen Carle. o8:33 10 MS. CARLE: Aello. My name is Carmen Carle, 12 and I live at 68730 Tortuga Road, Cathedral City. 12 I oppose the transfer. I'm a cancerned mother 13 � 14 08:33 15 16 17 18 19 08:34 20 zi 22 23 24 �8:34 25 of three. My daughter is in the 6th grade at James Warkman. For the past seven years, she has received an excellent education with the Palm Springs Unified Schoal District, but it's very difficult at this point because the classraoms are overcrowded, the school is overpopulated. We are being af£ected directly. I would definitely like to see the new schaol built because it's going to relieve a little bit of the crowdedness of the school. Cathedral City is growing txemendously and, with that, we need new schools. We passed, as you know, Measure S last year. We have the money, we have the tunds, why can't we build the schools. Cathedral City's children, as well as 42 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 I � 2 3 4 08:34 5 6 7 8 9 08:35 10 12 12 13 � 14 08:35 15 16 17 18 19 08:35 20 21 22 23 24 �08:35 25 Rancho Mirage, Thousand Palms and Palm Desert children will benefit from this school. As a parent, I don't think the question is about can Palm Springs Unified School District build a school or not. The question should be, as a parent, when will construction start. MR. GARCIA: Fred Carrick. The other ground rule is that don't beat me up on the way out if I mispronounce your name. MR. CARRICK: Hi. My name is Fred Carrick. It's 68395 Espada Road in Cathedral City. Part of the reason why I'm here this evening is I was one of the members of the Blue Ribbon Committee when we founded the bond. And part of our conversations through this is that we already had the land set aside in our thoughts. And sa we went to the voters on this that says, well. this is the amount of money that we need because we are not going out and purchasing other properties because we didn't need to, it was there. And if you use sound judgment in your planning, if you've got money already there, you're not going to spend it, you're not gaing to go out and laok somewhere else. And the other portion of it was the people of Thousand Palms, their transportation, because a few years prior to this, about four years, we were going to move the boundaries of Cathedral City into Palm Springs Psquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 43 � 1 Unified -- I mean Palm Springs High School. And we had 2 a little meeting at the high school and we decided that 3 4 08:36 5 6 7 8 9 08:36 10 11 12 13 � 14 U8:36 15 16 17 1$ 19 08:37 2Q 21 22 23 24 .08:37 25 was not a prudent decision at that time -- and I was part of that little group -- because of the pride that we carry inside af each district and each school. The biggest thing if you take and look at the population grawth currently, and ten years from now, currently with the hotels going into all the casinos and the group af people who are going to have to suppart that, they are going to be Zooking for an area of population and that is going to be in Thousand Palms, there are going to be homes caming in there that we hadn't planned for. So this is a prudent decision to keep the property right where it is versus moving it. And I thank you. MR. GARCIA: Karin Knudsen. MS. KNUTSON: My name is Karin Knutson. And my address is 68695 San Felipe, Cathedral City. I'm apparent of four children. I have two high school students and one eighth grader and a fourth grade girl, and they are attending Cathedral City High School and James Workman. And Y'm part of both of the site councils at bo�h schools, and so therefore we have been talking about overcrowding and numbers and situations that those issues cause. 44 Esquire Depositioa Services 714.$34.1571 1 � 2 3 4 08:37 5 6 7 8 9 08:38 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:38 15 16 17 18 19 08:38 20 21 22 23 24 �o8:3s zs And my concern today, mostly, is that I do not want to see us move backwards in time in order to create these high schools. I believe we need to move forward. And we need to move forward and create them as quickly as possible because of the overcrowdinq that you've heard. And unless you�ve been, you know, at lunch at the hiqh school and see how tough it is for these kids really to move around and to get around, the thought of adding a couple hundred more students for next year and going up to the 2500 marker for Cathedral City Hiqh School, it's an issue. And we are trying �o work within that issue and provide great education and a great environment there, and I beZieve that happens at Cathedral City High School. My other concern is I'm not oae of believing in all these territories. I would like to see us as the Coachella Valley and to see us as a community that has less boundaries instead of more boundaries. And so my concern is -- and I have never said this out loud before -- but I'm sort of said that our schools are actually called Cathedral City and Palm Springs and La Quinta and Indio because for some kids those titles create a boundary, instead of having schools where we are serving the community. Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 45 1 � 2 3 4 08:39 5 6 7 8 9 08:39 IO 1i 12 13 � 14 08:39 15 16 27 18 19 08:39 20 21 22 23 24 �08:40 25 And I believe we need to serve the community. We need to bring down some of the issues, if you're cansidering racial issues or you're considering money issues, and make it as much as possible equal across the board. And so that's my thaught. Thank you sa much for Iistening. MR. GARCIA: John Mendoza. MR. MENDOZA: Good evening. My name is John Mendoza and I].ive at 72870 Mesa View Drive in Palm Desert, and I am the principal of Cathedral City High School. For the past three years, I sa� on the boundary committee of our district and it was abundantly clear my school was going to continue to grow, and in the next iew years I'm going to be over 3,000 students --- not 30,040, but 3,000 students. And as we speak, in fact, we are bringing in new two-story buiidings onto my campus. Bringing on new classrooms, however, is not going to solve many of the problems that I'm dealing with. Bringing on classrooms at my school is not going to deal with the specialty classrooms that I need to meet the needs of our students in laboratory sciences, for example. It will not alleviate the space probl.em I have inside the classroom -- or inside the office, I should say, because Fsquire Depositioa Services 714.834.1571 46 � 1 I don't have any space for additional support personnel. 2 Additionally, bringing on classrooms does not 3 resolve the problem that I need locker room space on my 4 08:40 5 6 7 @ 9 Moreover, we are not able to accommodate 08:40 10 students for student activities in a venue, to il accommodate the entire student body as we grow, so now 12 we have to make assemblies and things of that nature 13 optional, and that's not good, that's not good at all. � 14 While we are bringing on additional classrooms, 08:40 15 of course, that means we have to take up additional 16 athletic space. That too creates a probZem as our 17 classrooms begin to shrink with the Iarge number of 18 classrooms we have and of course the additional students 19 we have. 08:41 20 But more importantly, I'm also concerned about 21 not only the physical facilities we have on our campus 22 and the impact it will have, but also I'm cancerned 23 24 �08:41 25 campus, bringing on classrooms doesn't resolve that problem at all. Restroom facilities, cafeteria facilities, things of that nature, are extremely difficult to meet now with the growing population that I have. about the climate of our campus. Bringing on additional students in this nature will present problems of a safety nature, security issues begin to be an impact. a� Esquire Deposition Services 714.834,1571 1 � � 3 4 08:41 5 6 7 8 9 08:41 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:42 I5 16 17 18 Z9 08:92 20 21 22 23 24 �08:42 25 I also go on to say that this results in students becoming disconnected with our school., that's an issue with me. Our staff becomes disconneated, disenfranchised, because our campus is getting so large. Moreover, the generaZ identity of our school begins to be questioned. What I'm hoping you will do is reject this proposal because at Cathedral City High School we definitely need, on my portion of the district, to build another high school that we definitel.y have planned in the books, and T urge you to reject this proposal. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Jan Pye. MS. PYE: Good evening. My name is Janet Pye. I live at 9775 VaZparaiso Drive, Desert Hot Springs. T have served on the subcommittee for the boundaries committee for this school district, served on the Blue Ribbon Committee and served on the campaign committee Eor the Measure S. However, this evening I'm speaking as a resident in the Palm Springs Unified School District. I am opposed to the transfer and basically, I'l1 keep it short, as everyone wha has spoken before me, S just wanted to share with you some things that i find curious. I find it curious that the city counci.l Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.2571 48 1 � Z 3 4 08:43 5 6 7 8 9 08:43 10 il 1. 2 13 S 14 08:43 15 16 17 18 19 08:44 20 21 22 23 24 �0$:44 25 af Palm Desert did not have a unanimous vote for this, and that the Desert Sands School District did not walk up lock-step with the city council for tha.s transfer. I find it curious that the committee for Measure 5 was successful in presenting a viable plan to the community and to the Palm Sprinqs Unified School District and the property owners of the school district paid for that plan and bought into it. And now we are at a situation where someone can make a decision that that was not a good idea. I find it curious that, to your February 20th meeting, there was two choices of recommendation and one was to tentatively grant the transfer and �he other was to deny. I find it curious that it wasn't tentatively to grant or tentatively to deny. And lastly, I wouid like to ask that you have heard a lot of things that have been purported to be facts, which they probably are, but I would suggest that you take those tidbits of information and use them as arrows towards true information, and in that process, the nine statutes that you had mentioned, that you thoroughly look at items 3, 4, 6, 8 and 9 and determine whether or not those will really stand. MR. GARCIA: Pe�er Solomon. MR. SOLOMON: Thank you. Peter Solomon 3 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 49 1 � 2 3 4 08:44 5 6 7 8 9 08:45 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:45 15 16 17 18 19 08:45 20 Z1 22 23 24 �8:46 25 Bristol Court, Rancho Mirage. My company is Regency Homes, we are a subdivision builders. We buiid throughout the valley and we love both Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert. At present, we are currently completing Victoria Falls, which is a 350-home subdiv�sion at the intersection of Gerald Ford and Bob Hope in Rancho Mirage. We are 90 percent sold out and almost all of our homeowners either have kids or grandkids. Probably 35 or 40 percent of our homes -- or our homeowners have children who attend schools. And we are in Palm Springs Unified. One of the issues that�s very important when people come ta our sales office, they want to know not only the school that is currently available to their kids, but they want to know what's going to happen in the future. For the last several years, I've been aware that the Palm Springs Unified School District has been actively looking for land and is going to build a K through 8 and a high school in the area in question. I think that would be a breach af faith with a lot of our hameowners who have bought homes at our community. Additionally, we have a 275-home community on Monterey and Gerald Ford on the Rancho Mirage site that Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.157I 50 1 � 2 3 4 08:46 5 6 7 8 9 08:45 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:47 15 16 17 18 19 08:47 20 21 22 23 24 �8:47 25 we will be breaking ground in the next several months. And the same logic holds forth for that, that we make certain -- we take certain actions based upon representations. And in working with Palm Springs Unified, we have been made aware that, in the la�t several years� that there is going to be a new high school and there is qoing to be a new K through 8 in the area in guestion. From a business point of view, that's very important, not onZy from our point of view, but for our homeowners. And I thank you very much. MR. GARCIA: Teresa Strand. MS. STRAND: Hi. I'm Teresa Strand, 68b93 Hermosillo Road. And I'm a parent of two daughters in Palm Springs Unified; one is already graduated and the o�her is at James Workman. And I've been listening to everything, I was at the meeting earlier, and listening today and really thinkinq about it. Right now, when my daughter was at Palm Springs High School, it was really avercrowded and it was hard for them, the computer lab, as he was saying with the lab classes, to get quality education and that. We struggled through that, my daughter did well, she's going to college. Now my next daughter, I'm up with her now, she will be going to Cathedral City High School, Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 51 0 1 � 2 3 4 08:47 5 � 6 7 8 9 08:47 IO 11 12 13 � 14 08:48 15 16 17 18 19 08:48 20 21 22 23 24 �08:48 25 she's real concerned about the overcrowded, and I wish I could have brought her here so she could have spoken her little mind. But it is a concern of the kids. There's too many kids at lunch, passing periods. It's scary far middle school kids going to high school, as it is, so going into an overcrowded school is only going to make the problem worse. As far as community identity, I lived in Desert Hot Springs and brought my daughter to Cathedral City to play AXSO sports and litt].e league, so you can make your community where you choose to make it. Cathedral City had more activities so I brought her here where she could be a part of that. It's unfair to these students. If you take away this area, it's unfair to these students. There's a small majority of peaple that it will benefit and there's a larger amount that will be directly impacted from that. And as far as the bussing, I l.ived in Cathedral City and my daughter was bussed to Desert Hot Springs for a GATE class, I think it made her a well-rounded student, she met other people, she had friends in Desert Hot Springs as well as Cathedral City. So the bussing issues, the other issues that have come up, I don't see Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 52 1 � 2 3 4 08:99 5 6 7 8 9 08:49 1Q 11 12 13 � 14 08:49 15 16 17 18 19 08:49 20 21 22 23 24 �08:50 25 it as a problem if you're willing to work around it, but I do see the overcrowding as a big problem and there's no way out unless we keep that property. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: At this time, we will recognize individuals who are in favor of this petition brought by the City of Palm Desert. The first person I wauld like to call forward is Jennifer Andrade. MR. ANDRADE: She's not feeling well sa I�11 speak for her. Ae].lo, my name is Gerard Andrade, and I spoke at the last meeta.nq. I just wanted to reiterate how -- what I've been hearing is they kind of make it sound like the high school is going to be built in two or three years. And from what the councilman said was -- Palm Desert councilman -- it�s going to be more like 202Q. So it�s not going to help any af these people that have said their kids are in middle schaol or even elementary school. we just -- the area right now, there is homes there, lots of families who, you know, want to be part of their community with the ather kids, because there's quite a few kids that go to the Palm Desert schools, and there's some that ga to Palm Springs schoo].s, and so Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 53 I � 2 3 4 08:50 5 6 7 8 9 08:50 10 I1 12 13 � I4 08:51 15 16 17 18 19 08:51 20 21 22 23 24 �8:51 25 they can't interact as well because sometimes they are at their school and the other kids are at their school and they have da.fferent activities. I�m not sure exactly why they need to -- would need to build the schools way over at the very edge of their school district, �here's plenty of land just west of Monterey, plenty of open desert land that would be actually closer to Cathedral City High School that's so overcrowded and the middle schools that are so avercrowded, and also we heard how there's so much construction in Rancho Mirage. They would have plenty of students to fill their schools on that side. Yau know, it would be closer to all those schools that are overcx'owded. And it�s kind of -- it wasn't really -- I'm not sure exactly what their lawyer was talking about, how he's going to knaw who is going to buy the houses that are going to be under construction, I'm not sure how he knows who is going to buy and whether they are rich or poor ar white or black or whatever. Sa that kind of like threw me for a loop on that thing. And I just hope you would consider it deeply. It's going to be quite a few years before they ever make any schools -- my kids will be out of school before the high school is built, and so I do appreciate Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 54 1 � 2 3 4 08:52 5 6 7 8 9 os:s2 io 11 12 13 i 14 08:52 15 16 17 18 19 08:52 20 21 22 23 24 �08:53 25 you guys Zistening to us and I hope you consider strongly the wishes of 99 percent of the people that live in the area, which is in the effected area. By the way, my name is Gerard Andrade, I lxve at 73621 Heatherwood Drive in Palm Desert, in the effected transfer area. Thank you again. MR. GARCIA: Phyllis Ayotte. MS. AYOTTE: Hi. I'm Phyllis Lopez Ayotte. I came to Pa].m Springs in 1963 and I grew up here in the Palm Springs Unified School District. MR. GARCIA: Could you give us your address, ma'am. MS. AYOTTE: I live at 37735 Colebridge in Palm Desert. But in 1989, I came to Pa1m Desert to be a part of Palm Desert's community. And in '96, I bought a home at the Kaufman and Broad homes, and I was led to beiieve that I would be a part of Desert Sands Unified Schooi District, and I remember who told me that too. I had to make my life a juggling act just to be able to be a part of Desert Sands Unified School District, but I have done it. My neighbors' children go to private schools, or they also go to Desert Sands Unified School District and they do a juggling act to make it happen, and I know they are going to continue to Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 5S 1 � 2 3 4 08:53 5 6 7 a 9 08:53 10 11 12 13 i14 08:54 15 lb 17 18 19 08:54 20 21 22 23 24 �8:54 25 do that. Our children belong to the Palm Desert YMCA, they belong to the Palm Desert Community Center, they take dance lessons in Palm Desert, they play soccer at the Palm Desert community field and they are part of the community and they want to go to school in Palm Desert. Please, I ask you to let them go tn school in Palm Desert. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Melinda Clanton. MS. CLANTON: My name is Me2inda Clanton, and my address is 37647 Driscoll Street and I live in the Kaufman and Broad development. I would like you to please consider this transfer. These schools aren't even going to affect our children. When he put up the chart up here, the actual homes that he had up here that aren't even built yet, are -- in our development, there's 158 homes. In that, I don't know the exact number, but I teZl you there's probably not even 100 kids in our development. All these other schools don't have room for our kids. Palm Desert has room. And I don't understand why this is such a hard thing to not let the kids go to the schools that they live in the same area. And with the actua]. homes only being 558, he Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 56 1 � 2 3 9 08:55 5 6 7 8 9 08:55 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:55 15 16 17 18 19 08:55 20 21 22 23 24 �8:56 25 said all of those dwellings, but most of those are golf courses, I guess they are considering every single building for the homes, for the weekend or whatever -- I dan't knaw what you call those -- recreational homes. So I just would like you ta please consider this transfer. We would really appreciate it, aur kids would. 2010, my twins are in seventh grade, so they will be in 17th grade, they will be in coll.ege, probably almost done. Thank you very much. MR. GARCIA: Laura Hester. MS. HESTER: My name is Laura Hester, I live an at 73590 Heatherwood, Palm Desert. I would like to thank the City of Palm Desert and Desert Sands School District for finally addressing this situatian that we have been facing for years and years living where we do. I was at the first meeting this afternoon in La Quinta, but I did not speak, but I feel compelled to come before you this evening and speak to you. I'm a mother of five, three of whom have successfully graduated from Palm Desert schools and I have two more that are attending Palm Desert schools. First off, don't be swayed by the majority of voices in oppos�tion to this proposal. They are from Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 57 1 � 2 3 4 08:56 5 6 7 8 9 08:56 10 11 12 13 � 14 08:57 15 16 17 18 19 08:57 20 21 22 23 24 �8:57 25 the many thousands of people in many cities that represent the Palm Springs school district. The few of us that you will hear about tonight represent maybe 400 homes, 100 children, like Melinda said. We are just in a small corner of Pa].m Desert, our small iittle community there. I say, in rebuttal to the cities of Rancho Mirage and Thousand Palms, bravo, get your new schools, no one can deny there is a clear need for more schools in this Coachella Valley, but please, you dan�t need us to get this task done. You explain that your cities are growing, I'm sure that you can count on your growth ta build these new schools. Surely you don't need aur 100 children to subsidize these new schools. If you state that you are sa overcrowded already, why force our additional children into your overcrowded schools. Let them continue ta go to Desert Sands which have opened their arms to us and have stated that they have room for our students, which the majority of us already have, are going there. I am a registered voter, I could not vote for my school that my children attend, the bond issue, because I am not in that district. In conclusion, please consider that we, the community tihat this decision affects, please bring us Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 S8 i � � 3 4 08:58 5 6 7 8 9 48:58 10 11 Z2 13 � 14 0$:58 15 16 17 �8 19 08:59 2Q 21 22 23 24 �U8:59 25 home to Palm Desert where we belong. Please, Riverside County, hear us, the small group that this proposal affects, I'm confident that we can positively answer the nine statutes that have been brought up in our favor. This is not about whether to buiZd new schools. We all agree that the schools are needed, build the schools. This is about my neighborhood. This is about my children. This is about my community. Please hear our voices. I thank you. MR. GARCIA: Kathy Johnson. MS. JOHNSON: Good evening. I'm Kathy Johnson. I live at 73540 Woodward Drive in Palm Desert in the proposed transfer area. I spoke this afternoon about the community issue and wanting to be part of the Palm Desert community. Tonight I'm gaing to speak on something that several peaple mentioned wha were in opposition tp this measure, who have touched on earlier today, that this is a racial issue. This is not a racial issue. we are a raciaily diverse community in our iittle neighborhood. We have at least one Native American, my husband; we have my next-door neighbor, who is black; we have several Hispanics; we have Orientals. We are a very racially diverse neighborhood. And I am sure that the Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 59 1 other developments going in will also be racially � 2 diverse. 3 We weZcome that diverse city. We are not 4 trying to take flight because we don�t want our kids 08:59 5 going to school with black children or with Hispanic 6 children; that has nothing to do with it. We live in 7 Palm Desert, we want our kids to go to school in PaZm 8 Desert. More importantly, our kids want to go to school 9 in Palm nesert with the kids that they play sports with, p9:40 10 and the kids that they are with in the neighborhood. we 11 want �o be part of this community. I2 As far as the land issue, T agree, the schools 13 need to be buil�, but there's plenty of land in Rancho � 14 Mirage and plenty of Iand in Thousand Palms, build the 09:00 15 schools in one of thase communities. We want to be part 16 of Palm Desert and Desert Sands Unified is the district 17 that serves the vast majority oF Palm Desert and that's 18 where we would like to be served. 19 Thank you very much. 09:00 20 ' MR. GARCIA: Jef€ Levine. 21 MR. LEVINE: My name is it Jef� Levine. I live 22 at 37930 Drexell Drive, Palm Desert, in KauEman and 23 Broad. 24 First of all, I concur about the fact about the �09:00 25 need for more schools in the Cathedral City area, 60 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 Q9:01 5 6 7 8 9 d9:d1 10 11 12 i3 Kaufman and Broad is 10.2 miles from Cathedral City High School. The area that we are talking about is another 7 miles from Cathedral City Nigh School. You would be bussing all of these people in from Cathedral City into the Palm Desert area. There's a need for schools, they need to be in Rancho Mirage or in Thousand Palms to address the situation. First of all, thank you for addressing this huge and big problem. It is very fair to my family and my community to unite my community with a move to Desert Sands School District. For six years, Palm Springs Unified School District has been serving my community, Kaufman and Broad. How do they serve the comrnunity? � lA Palm Desert isn't even mentioned on the web site. What 09:01 15 kind of support and representation is that? 16 Every neighbor I�ve spoken with in Kauiman and 17 Broad is extremely unsatisfied with the current schoal 18 situation by not being able to go to Palm Desert I9 schools. What happened to the impor�ance of community 09:01 20 and city unity? if an entire community is unhappy, 21 something is wrong; something needs to be done. 22 All new homebuyers in Kaufman and Broad were 23 told that we were part of Deser� Sands Unified School 24 �09:02 25 District and would attend Carter Elementary and Palm besert school.s; T resent being told otherwise. 61 Fsquire Deposition Senrices 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 09:02 5 6 7 8 9 09:02 10 il 12 13 � 14 09:02 15 16 17 18 19 09:03 20 21 22 23 24 �09:03 25 Our whole community is splintered, we want to uni.fy with all Palm Desert. Our neighborhood parents are being backed into a corner in having to put our kids into private schools and find other ways to get our kids into Palm Desert schools. I have a 4-year-old and 8-month old. In the fall of 2003, I wil7. face this dilemma, where to gend my child to school. We want to be part of the Palm Desert community. It is all about community. What is our community without going to school with our fellow Palm Desert students and residen�s; fragmented community spirit and togetherness is the reality of today. We purchased our home to be a part of the whole community of Palm Desert. That includes YMCAs, youth centers, Palm Desert, youth sports and schools, a unified community. It is very sad that the politics and the financial issues involved for Palm Springs Unified SchooZ District is at the heart of their needs and not the cammunity of Palm Desert, i�s residents and especially the wants and needs of the residents. The absence of Palm Desert on the web site is proaf. What happened ta our community rights and our community needs? The community members of Kaufman and Broad, the kids in the surrounding areas want this move to be unified with all of Palm Desert. It should not be Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 62 � 1 . 2 3 4 09:03 5 6 7 8 9 09:04 10 l. l 12 13 � 14 09:04 15 16 17 18 19 09:04 20 21 22 23 24 �09:04 25 about politics and money, it's about the heart of the community. Thank you. Please approve this transfer, it's important to us and our family and friends. MR. GARCIA: Elizabeth Lindstrom. MS. LINDSTROM: My name is Elizabeth Lindstrom, also known as Lockwood. I live at 73520 Woodward, and I'm really happy to be here tonight because I caZled Palm Springs Unified School Aistrict on 3-21 at 11:43 in the morning to ask about this meeting because I had attended the one in Indio, and I was told that it had been cance�ed and a final decision had been made. Then I again called my own district and they said no, there was a continuation. I called back and informed your school district that yes, there was a meeting, and then I was called by one of your officers. The reasan why I'm up here is you might say that I am the lamb that's going to be slaughtered. I follow the book, I do everything the way the book says you have ta do it. I live in Palm Desert, my family does not. I don't have any friends or anything like that I can use thei.� addresses, I don't lie, I don't rent apartments. My husband and T have been to 158 homes, and that's how many homes are in our area. Do you actually know how many children go to the Palm Springs Unified Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.157I 63 0 1 � Z 3 4 09:05 5 6 7 8 9 09:05 10 11 12 13 . 14 09:05 15 16 17 18 19 09:06 20 21 22 23 24 �9:Ob 25 School District from our area? Three. And out of 150 homes, they all Iie, they all use other addresses. You're not losing body count, you don't have us anyway. You miqht as well let our children go to where their friends -- where they want to go to school. They are going to do it anyway. You talk about race. We are a mixed community. I myself have an Asian and Hispanic daughter, so you would -- to l.00k at me, you wouldn't realize that. That's alI I have to say. I just hope you approve the transfer because you don't have the body count. Again, we are out of yvur district anyway. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Shannon Martinez. MS. MARTZNEZ: My name is Shannon Martinez. I live at 37787 Driscoll Street in the Kaufman and Broad homes in Palm Desert. Thank you for letting us speak. I moved out to the Coachella Valley six years ago, and I rented an apartment for a coupie of years because my husband and I were a young couple just starting out, we wanted to buy a home. We didn't know the valley that well. So we rented so we could check out the communities everywhere. We chose Palm Desert out of La Quinta, Cathedral City, everywhere out here. And that is where we thought our Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 64 1 � 2 3 4 09:06 5 6 7 8 9 09:47 10 11 12 3. 3 � 14 09:07 15 I6 17 18 19 09:07 20 21 22 23 24 �9:08 25 kids would be going to school. Right now, the elementary schooJ. my kids are supposed to go to is in Thousand Palms. There are three schools closer in distance to me than that school, Carter, Lincoln and Washington. Washington, you have to get on a waiting list to attend, which I put my daughter on and she is now attending there. The thing I'm concerned wi�h is the middle school and the high school situation. Y guess I�m part of the vacal minority. I'm not a Iawyer, I'm not on the school board, but I am a mom like a lot of other parents in my neighborhaod with concerns about where my daughter and my son are going to go to middle school and high school. I want to be close to the school that they are going to be going to. And we know that new schools are going to need to be built, and that�s fine, we know that. We just want them to go to the schools in Palm Desert since we live in the city of Palm Desert and that's where we chose to buy our house. Thanks for 1.etting me speak. MR. GARCIA: Kelly Sharqawi. MS. SHARQAWI: �ii. My name is Ke1.Iy Sharqawi, and I live 37624 Colebridge in the Kaufman and Broad homes. This is going to be short. You've heard all my Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 65 1 � 2 3 4 09:08 5 6 7 8 9 09:08 10 11 12 23 � stories the last two meetings. I've have listened -- I went to the February meeting and the one earlier today. I have listened to many people, I've taken everything in and, you know, it really saddens me to listen to some of the things that people come up with when they are so desperate and when they have nothing e].se to use to wager a vote. It saddens me and it's very appalling. You know the problems that our world has today, you know, there's so much stress on us as adults that I don't feel that we should put that on our children. There's so many problems that we have in this world and yet still, even now, until today, you know, a problem comes up and we have to go �o the nearest thing that we 14 know, and that's race. 09:09 15 I'm half Hispanic and I'm half white; my 16 husband is Arab; my anybody is white; my other neighbor 17 black, my other neighbor is Ainerican Indian. And, you 18 knaw, I went home the first time, I couldn't sleep 19 because I just -- it sickened me to think that this -- 09:09 20 you knaw, we are sitting here being told that we are a 21 22 23 24 �9:09 25 minority, that we are being segregated, that we are just this small group of nobody homes, 15d pion homes over there, and you know, I'm not a teacher, I'm not a principal, and I know on most -- the majority -- al]. of the people that I know that are here from this area, 66 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 09:09 5 6 7 8 9 09:1a 10 11 12 13 � 14 09:10 15 16 17 i8 19 09:10 20 21 22 23 24 �09: 11 25 none of them are teachers or principals, you know. It just -- it saddens me to know that I get a phone call today telling me that -- well, a bunch of the Palm Sprinqs teachers got letters in their boxes saying to go to these meetings and I have sat here and the majority of the people here are teachers on boards, members, principals, i mean, we are nobody. I know that, but we are people and we are here because we have children and 2010 is not going to impact our children now. And like a few of the other par�nts said, reality is, the parents that are �here, they want to qo to Palm Desert, they are going to go, whether you pass this or not. It's just not fair that they have to do it the way they are doing it. You knaw, I got three kids, I am so involved in their sports and activities and in their schools. I'm not going to sit and take -- my cha.ld gets out at 3:00. By the time he gets out, it's 3:20. He has baseball practice at 4:20. Do you think I�m going to drive aii the way over to Palm Springs or Cathedral City? For that matter, I don't have time. When am I qoing to have dinner -- or it's dark out, it's unrealistic. I resent the fact of someone standing here telling me that I did not -- or I was not told when I purchased my home that I was not going to be in this Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 67 1 � 2 3 4 09:11 5 6 7 8 9 09:11 10 11 12 13 � 14 d9:12 15 16 17 18 Z9 09:12 20 21 22 23 24 �09:12 25 district, because that's exactly what z was tald, I was going to be in this district. I do not lie, and that is the truth. T was under the impression I was going to be in this district. I thank you very much and I plead for you to support it, please make the transfer. Thank you. MR. GARCIA: Denise Whitley. Denise Whitley. This concludes the presentation by members of the public. At this time, I'd like to have members of the committee, if there's any questions or comments to be made at this time. MS. CLARK: Yes, if yau could explain to the people we are not making a decision tonight and when, within the 120 days when we have the next meeting, you can come again and speak and that's when we will be making the decision. And please find out the exact date, call the Riverside Department of Ed instead of maybe the person that told you the wrong information before. MR. GARCIA: We are just trying ta make a clarificatian. MS. CLARK: I just want everyone to know because you know exactly what's going on. A lot of people assume we might make the decision this evening Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 .: i � 2 3 4 09:13 5 6 7 S 9 09:13 10 11 12 13 � 14 09:13 15 16 17 ia 19 09:13 20 21 22 and I don't want you to feel that you're being misled by us, that you know what's going on for sure. AlI right? MR. GARCIA: Thank you, Ms. Clark. The process that I described earlier in our Desert Sands lacation is that this is a public hearing to get information from the community at large. County comma.ttee on school district organization purposely goes to each school district site. Our usual si.te is in the Riverside County Office of Education. The Febtuary meeting that people referred to in their commentary was to decide to hoid the public hearing, it wasn�t to decide to grant the petition. The petition cannot be granted or considered until the public hearing process has taken place. Now staff will prepare a recommendation. And T'm going to ask Ms. Topham right now what the procedure is that takes place at this time. MS. TOPHAM: The public hearings have been held in each effected schovl district, the county committee has 120 days to make a decision. They will meet again close to the end of that 120 days. And the county committee has hired to consultant to provide the study 23 for us this year. 24 At this time, you met Mike Winters from 09:14 25 Caldwell Flores Winters, who will be developing that � 69 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 09:14 5 6 7 B 9 09:14 10 11 12 I3 � 14 09:14 15 16 1� 18 19 09:15 20 21 22 23 24 �09:15 25 study; I believe several of you spoke with him. The study will be published ten days to two weeks be£ore the meeting, and those of yau who received folders and information about this meeting will receive folders and information about the next meeting. The study will be included in that. And it will be discussed at that meeting. MR. GARCIA: Thank yau. Mr. Ray. MR. RAY: Mr. Chairman. The date 2010 came out several times, and I found this very confusing, if the money is already there and that's a long time to build a high school. Could I get some clarification on that? W-ihen is this high school in the area to be bui3.t and are there negotiations going on right now far acquiring the property? MR. GARCIA: I think, in the instance of time, Mr. Ray, can you refer that question to staff to qet a c].arification on that instead of trying to get input from the respective schooi districts. This is quite an emotianal issue for the committee tonight. So Ms. Topham a.s making note of that question. MR. RAY: Thank you. MS. HOLLINGSW4RTH: I have two questions that I 70 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 1 i2 3 A 09:15 5 6 7 8 9 09:I5 10 11 12 13 • 14 09:16 15 16 17 18 Z9 09:16 20 21 22 23 24 09:16 25 � would like the staff to address. It was said here tonight that taxes would be raised in both districts if we granted that transfer; I'd like ta understand how that can happen. And also where did the developer fee go in that area, that Kaufman and Broad area. MR. GARCIA: Any other members ot the committee like to add a question or a comment? Mr. Ray. MR. RAY: I would also like the study -- or request of the study to include information how many total homes will be built in that area and how much money are we really talking about �hat one district would lose or one district would gain. MR. GARCIA: Ms. Clark. MS. CLARK: And if staff would look at one more question, and I'm not sure if I understood it correctly, so that's why -- if the bonds were passed in both areas, Desert Sands and Palm Springs, why Desert Sands doesn't have any plans to build. Or if I misunderstood, would that be clarified, please. MR. GARCIA: Okay. Any other comments? Just for the record, I would like to say that this committee consists of 21 members, two members for each supervisory district. We have a member at large, Mrs. Hollingsworth, and so we will -- when this issue -- Esquire Depositioq Services 714.834.1571 71 1 � 2 3 4 04:17 5 6 7 8 9 09:17 10 11 12 13 ! 14 09:17 15 16 17 18 19 09:18 20 21 22 23 24 09:18 25 � the reason I bring that up is that this committee is a cross-section of the Caunty of Riverside. It doesn't specifically favor one geographical area over another. We do have -- we work very closely with staff, county office of education, along with our consultant. Each of the nine questions or the nine conditions in terms of haw this petition can be considered wilZ be researched thoroughly and a recommendation will be brough� before this committee. At that time, it wil]. be an action item that the committee will undertake and each of the nine canditions have to be voted individuaily. When that meeting does take place, it will be published in the print media and also announced through all the media and also in each respective school district site. So there will be ample time ta look at the document vnce it's completed, and at the time that this committee reconvenes ta take action, you're invited to come back and speak before the committee. At this time, I'm going ta close the public hearing on the proposed transfer oE the territory. Thank you for coming toniqht. Pursuant to Government Section Code 5494.2, and Educational Code Sections 3125145 .5 and 72121 .5, could 72 Esquire DeposiEioa Services 714.834.1571 1 � 2 3 4 09:16 5 6 7 8 9 09:19 10 11 12 13 � 14 09:19 15 16 17 18 19 09:19 20 21 22 23 24 �09:20 25 you please go outside, we need -- we want to get home. Any person wishing to address the county committee on any other relevant issue or matter will be heard at this time. Is there anybody else that would like to come before the committee at this time? UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Can you make sure that we get those folders because we weren't mailed those folders with the study in it. You said that some of the people would get the study. MR. GARCIA: Call the county office of education in Riverside, the address is -- MS. TOPHAM: The number is (909) 826-6448. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: Who do you ask far? MS. TOPHAM: That number will get you -- that's Sharen Topham, and ask for information. UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: I wanted to ask you about the intradistrict transfers, because -- I'm sorry, I'm really nervous -- because the fact of the matter is that the high school is so far away and a lot of us do have high schools at this time. Are you going to let us transfer? MR. GARCIA: Ma'am, we have closed the public hearinq, first af all, and that's not an issue that this committee will act on. We don't have any jurisdiction over that. Ma'am, the public hearing is over. I have Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 73 � �� L� � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ia ii IZ 13 14 15 16 i7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 to go on to another matter at this time. // // 74 Fsquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 � � � 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 aa 21 22 23 24 25 I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand Repvrter of the State of California, do hereby certify: That the foregoing proceedings were taken before me at the time and pZace herein set forth; that any w�tnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to testifying, were placed under oath; that a verbatim record of the proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; further, that the foregoing is an accurate transcription thereof. I further certify that I am neither financially interested in the action nor a re3ative or employee of any attorney of any of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date subscribed my name. Dated: JUk 1 � 2(�'1 i / � ,� ,� .�'-�'�:� ,.� ,. . . . �... SUZANNL` S�.�tIN E�LOW CSR No. 565 CHANGESICORRECTIONS � � Page/Line � From ! To � � � } � � I � � � � � ' � f � � i Witness signature Dat• Transcript of Proceedings _� �_ _ ability 9:4 28:15 � bk 12:5 14:3 15:16 20:Z3 25:12 33:18 35:12 39:23 47:9 55:2161:18 absence 62:21 8t)bOI'�1�100 �:12 abundendy 46:13 AB-1619:25 academk 28:10 accommodate 27:23 47:9,11 acconnt 9:13 accunte 75:13 acqulescing 28:4 acq�ired 33:3,4,6 acquitiag 33:2 7d:16 scre 22:8 acres 6:11 11:2,3,6 20:16 22:4 act 55:20,2A 73:24 action 18:3 72:10 72:19 75:16 actions 183 19Z0 51:3 actively 50:20 activitk:s 21:4 47:10 52:13 54:3 67:16 �sctua156:16,?S dd 2622 71:7 adding 45:10 additioa 14:814:4 additfona147:1,14 47:15, I8,23 58:16 Additionslly 47:2 S0:?A address 26:2 31:20 34:16,17,18,19 3420 38:5 44:18 55:1156:12 61:7 71:173:2,11 eddressed 20:20 39:3 addresses 63:21 6a:z addressing 57:15 61:8 adequate 7:1i adjoining 8:12 administratioas zs:z adults 66:9 adv�ntage R:10 adversely 23:6 Advisory 3:9 aRect 27:20 56:15 affrnwtive 17:15 a�'ord 25:8 �anets000 21:8 2225 23:14,25 38:11,19 39:10 57:18 59:15 ages 33:19 ago 13:25 64:29 agrte 59:6 60:12 agreed 32:3 agreewent 13:8 akfed 26:23 ,�ik�ens 10:6,8,8 11:24 Aka 16:17,20 ALEXANDER 3:12 aliga 11:5 13:8 allegiance 4:6,7 aUeviate 14:16 15:146:24 aUocated 8.24 alloUed 8:25 allov►11:16 ellowed 9:1137:14 allowlog 28:5 37:i8 alphsbetica19:5 ambulances 30:16 ameodment 36:18 American 59�2 66:17 aawunt 22:11 43:16 52:18 ample 72:17 aualyzet131:4 Andrade 53:8,9,11 55:4 A,ndrew 10:13 263 26:4 annexed 24:17 announced 72:14 answer 40:18 593 any6ody 36:1 66:16 73:4 anyway 64:3,6,12 apsrt 20:7 apartment 64:20 apartmeats 63:22 aPPaWng 66:7 apparent 44:19 appear 1421 APPEARANCES 3:1 application 31:9 39:2 appreciate 35:24 sa:zs s�:� apprnached 38:24 approval I7:17,24 1825 approve 7:5 18:Zd 19:6,12 23:1 63:2 64:10 apprnved 11:4 28:20 39:12 approviag 35:24 apprnaimately 6:1135:4 Aprll 1:13 2:19 4:1 17:4 25:2128:19 A�b 66:16 ardendy 38:21 area 10:19,23 11:4 11:5,9,18 i2:4,8 14�,6,10 15:12 15:1516:7,8 18:9,12,12,13,22 20:8,1122:20 23:20 24:4,I7 26:8 27:130:6 32:11,23 33:6 35:7,1Q 36:17 39:23 40:19 41:14 42:2 44:10 SQ:2151:8 52:26 53:21553,3,6 56:24 59:I4 60:25 61:2,5 63:24 64:166:25 70:15 71:5,5,11 72:3 areas 10:21 13:5 14:13 19:9 22:9 22:23 415 62:?A 71:17 acguments 27:19 38:25 arms 58:18 Arueson 3:12 16:21 arrows 49:20 Asi�w 64:8 aside 30:2 43:14 ssked 41:6 ssldng 42:5 assemblies 47:12 assistant 3:11 5:14 associxtion 10:11 asaume 68:25 sssumed 30:3 sssvming 22:17, 29 athktic 47:16 attend 25:4 50:12 58:22 6124 65:6 eKendance 36:13 attended 63:10 attendin;15:7 44:2157:23 65:7 attorney 16:21 75:17 andiolapiug 5:21 audiovisual 5:19 5:20 August 7:3 sufLority 30:8 availabk 26:14 SO:i6 Avenne 6:13 ave�age 30:10 avoid 1420 avratt 3A:22 aware 50:18 51:5 Ayotte 55:7,8,8,13 AYSO 52:11 -- --$ - B 34:6 back 5:15,20 25:19 37:18 39:24 63:13 72:20 backed 62:3 bacicwartls 45� balanced 28:7 bang 24:8 BARRY 3:4 baseba1167:18 based 30:14 39:4 513 baaicelly 37:13 48:22 basis 7:14 Beac6 3:13 beat 43:7 becoming 48:2 begtnning 2:I8 10:20 begins 48:5 bel�alf 1b:22 belief 30:15 be[ieve 13:10 25:13 19:16 24:16 31:8 45:3,14 46:1 55:17 '10:1 belkving 45:16 belong 56:2,3 59:1 beaeGt 43:2 52:17 best 9:4 12:14 16:12 26:14 28:16 41:3 42:6 bet 20:9 better 17;22 22:16 big 11:2 24:8 33:7 40:17 532 6I:9 biggest 44:6 bi1120:2 bit 12:2 18:8 42:20 black 54:20 59:23 60:5 66:17 bine 9:2,10 43:12 48:18 board 10:10,12 22:1813:16 26:2128:19,22 34:7,8 36:25 38:11 46:5 65:11 boards 13:8 67:6 board's 10:11 Bob 31:19 34:23 50:7 body 47:11 64:3,11 boils 27:18 bond 13:2519:22 20:1,9 26:8 35:6 3520 39:22 43:13 58:22 boads 22:19,20,21 24:1 71:17 book 63:18,18 books 48:11 bottow 22:13,14 booght 49:8 50:23 55:16 bonndaries 11:5 13:9 41:10 43:25 45:19,19 48:17 boundary 4]:11 45:24 46:12 bounded 6:12 Bowie 3:12,12 26:17,1$,Z0,21 17:7 24:12,15 boxes 67:4 Bredky 37:24,25 38:4,6,6 bt�vo 58:8 breach 50:22 breaking 51:1 brief 26:22 briefly 17:12,20 bring 73:20 ?d:4 25:146:2 58:25 72;1 bringing 46:17,18 4620 47:2,4,14 47:23 brings 22:13 Bristol 50:1 Broad 11:14 24:20 40:19,?3 55:17 56:13 60:23 61:1 61:13,17,22 62:24 64:16 65:24 71:5 brought 6:18 8:21 52:2,10,13 53:6 59:4 72:9 buck 24:8 Bud 5:12 27:$,10 bulld 13:6 25:10 27:5 35:8 39:23 42:24 43:4 48:9 50:2,20 54S 58:13 59:5,6 60:14 70:13 71:19 builder 24:20 buiWers 50:2 buiWing 29:16 57:3 buildings 46:18 bnilt 25:6 35:3 40:19 42:19 53:15 54:?.5 56:17 60:13 65:16 70:15 71:11 bunch 673 bus 21:9 Q4/15/2002 Bqsch 3:4 5:7 bnsiness 3:9 51:8 bassed 52:21 bnssing 52:20,24 61:4 busy 16:1 Butler 40:11,12,12 bny 30:15,1'1,19,24 54:17,19 64:21 65:19 buys 30:11,22 L cafeterie 47:5 Ca12b25 Caldwell 5:1617:8 69:Z5 Caleta 26:5 Celifornis 1:12 2:17 3:13 4:1 18:2,4 23:4 75:b ca114:15 30:16 53:8 57:4 672 68:18 73:10 calkd 4:12 45:22 63:7,12,13,15 campsign 48:18 campus 3:13 27:1 46:18 47:4,21,23 48:4 caaceled 63:11 Canyon 2:17 careth134:14 cat�ag 26:12 Cadc 42:9,10,10 Carlos 31:13,15 34:25 Carmea 42:9,10 Grrkk 43:6,9,9 carry 15:24 44:5 Csrter 61:24 65:5 casinos 44:8 category 37:24 Cathedra113:2 14:1615:1 27:11 28:23 31:22,25 33:4 38:7,8,8 39:114Q:1,7 42:4,11,21,25 43:10,25 44:18 44:2145:11,15 45:?2 46:10 48:8 51:25 52:10,12 52:20,7A 54:8 60:25 61:1,3,4 64:24 67:20 cause 8:15 43:25 causing 8:10 cetebrate 29:21 ceiebratiug 30:1 cwter 6:13,14 56:3 centers b2:15 certaia 6:12 30:11 51:3,3 Page 1 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 Transcript of Pr�eedings 69:25 devebpment lI2 18:17 40:18,20 56:I3,18,20 developments 6Q:2 Diedric611:23,24 14:23 dit%nnce 14:25 di�'ereat 28:9 30:7 ais sa:3 dit�cnit a2:16 a7:7 ditemma 62:7 dinner 67:22 direction 39:9 75:13 directly 42:18 52:18 dirt 41:24 disadvantage 28:14 disadvantaging 28:4 disapprnve 7:5 disconnected 4$:2 483 discrimiaation 7:21 18:1 19:1 discussed 12:15 70:6 discusses 18:7 disenfranchised 48:4 disrnpt 8:142� �srnpttd 21:1 dLsruption 21:2,3 21:16 distance 12:9 65:4 distributed 16:ZS 32:9 district 1:1,2 2:4,5 2:16 4:10,11,13 5:25 6:1,8,9,20 6:21 ?:18 8:12 8:13,17,17 10:7 10:9,22,2211:2 11:5,8,I0,12,19 12:16,23,?S 13:13 14:9,20 1520 16:3,9,23 18:10,14 29:14 19:17 20:12,24 21:4,17 22:7 23:3,7,11 24:18 2420,23 25:3,5 25:23,25 2b:13 27:13,16 28:16 30:2,12,12,12,25 31:1,2,7,18 32:1 32:l,3U,22 33:9 33:13,14,23 34:14 35:20 36:19,22,24 37:9 38:3�24 39:6 � 40:5,14 41:6 42:16 43:4 44:5 46:13 48:9,17,21 49:2,7,7 50:19 54:6 55:10,19,22 5524 57:15 58.2 58?3 60:16 61:11,12,24 62:18 63:8,12,14 64:1,12 68:1,2,4 69:7�8,19 71:12 71:13,24 7216 districts 7:11�13,18 720 8Z,2,4 10:1813:S�I1 15:23 28:3 32:10 32:10,11,16 37:3 41:23 70:2171:2 district's 33:17 diverse 28:6,11 59:21,25 60:2,3 division 7:17 document 19:11 72:18 documentation 19� docnments 17:11 doing 33:17 38:13 67:13 Don 10:5,8 Donald 3724 38:6 doubt 22:22 dowotown 30:19 Dr 5:1411:23,24 i4:23 Drexell 60:22 Driscoll 56:12 64:I6 drive 3:13 6:2,14 25:18 40:12 46:9 48:15 55:5 59:13 60:22 67:19 drop 12:19 dropped 11:8 daly 14:?2 dwelling 20:13,16 21:23 22S dwelliugs 57:1 Dwig6t 17:8 earfler 12:2513:16 15:8 16:1,19 18:9 2313 36:4 36:12 38:2 40:22 51:17 59:19 66:2 69:4 eartkst 2320 early 31:4 cssicr 23:26 Eest 2:16 26:5 Ed 68:18 edge 54:5 educatioa 5:11 10:10 13:15,17 2i:9 22:16 26:21 27:4,20 28:11,16 28:19 36:25 42:15 45:13 5122 69:9 72:5 73:11 educationai b:25 7:9 8:1,4 21:4,16 7225 ed'ect 8:15 15:5 28:14 32:9 effected 55:3,6 69:19 eightb 44:20 either 34:14,15 37:23 SO:ld elected 28:22 election 19:22 20:4 20:9 elemtntary 41:8 53:19 61:24 65:2 Etizabeih 63:4,5 Emily 25:17 26:1 emotional 41:14 70:22 empsthy 40:22 employec 75:17 enscted 20:2,1 eacoarages 28:21 England 27:8,9,10 enhance 27:4 enhancing 22:13 enrolled 7:12 entire 35:20 47:11 61:20 entitled 17:2 environment 45:14 eqna! 9:17 46:4 eqnitable 7:17 Espada 43:10 esptciaily 62:2Q establiahiag 27:2 ethnic 7:2018:1 19:1 ethnkity 33:19 34:20 EveluAtion 17:1 eveaing 5:13,Z4,21 16:19,22 17:14 29:2 43:1146:8 48:14,19 57:20 59:12 68:25 events 29:21,25 eveatuality 12:7 everybody 32:5 33:7 evidence 34:7 eaact 56:29 68:17 e!iactiy 54:4,16 68:1,24 ea�mple 46:73 excelleat 13:13 30:?.3 31:1,7 38:16,18 42:15 ezcuse 14:18,19 Exhibit 19:11 existing 8:17 20:2 expand 12:2 expectations 28:9 e�ertise 23:24 36:23 explain 58:11 68:13 expresscd 9:14 ��a i�:�a exten�ting 24:4 extremely 15:3 47:6 61:17 face 41:20 62:7 [acilities 7:17 14;1120:17 21:1 27:22 47:5,6,21 facing 57:16 fect 12:6,2413:23 21:20 23:4 33:5 35:18 39:8,21 40:25 46:17 60:24 67:23 73:18 tectors 30:23 fects 18:24 49:18 fsctually 24:4 fsir 11:20,21 61:9 67:13 faiW 50:22 fAU 62:7 Fells 50:6 famities 28:23�24 53:22 family 6I:9 63:3 63:19 famous 29:23 far 19:8 24:13 37:8 52:9,24 60:12 73:19 faster 25:1 26:16 fat6er 10:13 27:21 29:14 faulty 11:14 fsvor 53:6 54:4 72:3 February 6:22 1720 49:11 66:2 69:10 fee 71:4 fee112:413:23 57:19 66:10 69:1 [eeliag 53:9 feels 1423 fees 20:19 F�lipe 44:18 fellow 10:12 62:10 felt 29:8 Ferber 40:12 Festiva12922 6eld 56:5 Hfth 29:9 6gnre 29:7 �u sa:12 filled 9:2,10 37:12 6na! 10:25 24:?S 63:11 6nally 57:15 %naaces 25:10 Gnancia18:10 13:19 21:162:17 t'iasnciaUy 75:16 fiad 13:13 19:4,11 21:3 22:1,3 23:5 38:23 48:25,25 49:4,11,14 b2:4 68:17 Hnding 17:15,24 21:19 findings 31:5,6 6u�e 38:16 65:17 Grst 22:22 31:23 35:138:14 53:7 57:18,?A 60:24 61:8 66:18 73:23 tisca18:16,16 ?3:6 23:10 36:19,20 37:3 tkcally 36:22 �scher 3:10 5:14 tivc 10:15 35:7 57:2I tlight 60:4 �oafs 29:17 F1orCs 5:1617:8 b9:25 [olders 70:3,4 73:7 73:8 folks 23:15 31:22 foUow 63:18 foUowing 7:7,10 9:7 [ollows 7:1d force 58:15 Ford 50:7,25 fo�going 75:7,9 75:23 torm 37:13 [ormuls 32:9 forth 51:2 75:6 forward 12:13 13:9 3I14 3624 38:5 45:3,4 53:8 fonod 22:9 38:20 70:12 founded 43:i3 four 10:19,20 35:3 35:7 40:14 4324 44:19 fourth 44:2� fragmented 62:11 Frank 6:2,14 11:9 Fi�ed 43:6,9 friends 52:23 63:3 6320 64:5 04/15/2002 front5:13 t'�wctions 2925 fands 42:24 fi�rnish 17:11 !'urther 39:7 75:13 75:15 t�uture 25:13 50:18 .r � --- Gabor's 29:9 gaiu 5:23 71:13 Garcia 3:5 4:4,8 5:1,2,I0,2210:5 14:2217:5 24:12 25:15 26:3,19 27:8 29:131:11 36:1,5,8 37:6 38:1 40:11 42:9 43:b 44:16 4b:7 48:13 49.24 51:12 53:5 55:7 55:11 56:10 57:1159:11 60:24 63:4 64:14 65:22 68:7,21 693 70:$*18 71:6,14,21 73:10 73:22 Gary 40:11,12 GATE 52:22 genera136:I7 48:5 gentleman 24:7 geatkmcn 12:10 ���P�l 41:10 72:3 Gerald 50:7,25 Gerard 53:1155:4 getting 20:10 21:22 48:4 GIANNOIYE 3:12 gir144:21 give 9:17 16:4,13 21:5 55:11 given 17:7 18:5,6,6 41:7 gled 36:21 go 10:16,21,23 11:7,1012:5,9 13:9 15:16 17:4 18:18,Z3 19:14 2Q:8 21:12 23:4 27:12 30:20 33:12 34:21 3?:13 38:139:24 4I:9 4321 4$:1 53:24,25 55:22 55:23 56:6,7,23 58:17 60:7,8 61:18 63:25 64:4 64:5 65:3,14,17 66:13 67:4,11,i2 71:5 73:1 74:1 goes 21:21 22:5 69:7 Page 3 Esquire Deposidon Services 714.834.1571 Transcript of Proceedings large 47:17 48:4 69:6 71:24 arger 27:5 52:18 rgest 24�0 lastly 49:16 late 10:20 I.eura 57:11,12 law 17:16 Iawyer 54:16 65:11 Inyers 30:6 lead 4:6 ieagne 52:11 leave 2SZ4 led 55:17 leR 24:13 legal 5:13 kgally 11:14 18:20 19:5,12 lessoas 56:4 letter 25:17,19,22 ktters 67:4 letting 64:18 6521 kt`s 33:10 levels 28:30 [xvine 60:20,21,21 Ik 63:2164:2 682 lite 29:2130:14 55�0 light 20:2 3b:17 lig6ts 29:22 30:18 limited 202132:8 L3nrnln 35:17 65:5 Lindstrom b3:4,5 � . 63:5 line 6:13,14 22:13 22:14 32:2 lines 31:4 list 65:6 listen 66:4 listened 38:25 66:1 66:3 tistening 23:13 46:6 51:16,17 SS:i IitUe 12:218:8 42:20 44:2,4 52:3,11585 59:21 live 12:4 26:4 30:6 38:8 42:3,11 46:9 48:15 55:3 55:4,13 56:12,24 57:12 59:13 60:6 60:21 63:6,19 64:16 65:18,24 lived 40:23 52:9,2a lives 30:9 living 57:17 locai:sl 5:16 location 69:5 bcicer 47:3 Lockwood 63:6 bck-step 49:3 �logk 51:2 Iogica115:25 long 12:1I 13:5 14:14 15:11 20:25 24:'7 26:12 70:13 look 15:2019:2 25:10 30:23,23 37:3 40:15 43:21 44:6 49:22 64:9 71:15 72;17 looked 33:2 looldng 14:4,5,25 28:8 36:24 39:I4 41:22,25 44:10 50:20 looks 25:8 Ioop 54:21 Lopez 55:8 lose ?3:7 3223 34:2 71:13 losing 41:15 64:3 lost 33:10 loi 11:25 18:17 20:16,17,17 21:23 29:9 40:20 49:17 50:22 65:12 68:24 73:19 bts 53:22 loud 4520 love S03 lunc6 45:7 52:5 __� macLine 75:11 mailed 73:7 Mainiern 3:7 5:3,4 me�j or 40:18 majority 6:5 42:3 42:6 52:17 57:24 58:19 60:27 66:24 67:5 maldng 7:5 26:13 68:14,17 70:23 MAN 36:3,7 management 8:16 23:6,10 msaager 3:9 31:15 38:7 mandated 6:25 maps 41:7 11�Iarch 28:18 marluer 45:11 Martinez 64:14,15 64:15 materia118:5 matter 16:1417:16 393,19 67:21 73:3,18 74:1 maximum 9:11 mayor 30:4 ms'am 55:12 73:22 73:25 McCabe 1Q:14 McCal15:20 mena 44:167:7 meaos 20:5 22:24 47:15 measure 42:23 48:19 49:5 59:19 media 72:14,15 mcat 12:2213:21 14:615:11 18:11 46:22 47:7 69:20 mceting 4:A,12 1b:9 36:13 38:3 44:2 49:12 51:17 53:12 5�:18 63:9 63:14 662 b8:15 69:10 70:3,4,5,7 72:13 meetings 66;167:5 Melinda 56:10,11 58:4 member 26:20 27:10 28:18 71:24 members 3:3 4:15 5:116:6 10:12 12:1815:20 29:3 35:137:i2 43:12 6223 67:6 68:8 68:10 71:6,23,23 Mendoza 46:7,8,9 mentioned 17:3,13 49:21 59:18 61:14 Meredy 1Q:14 26:19,20 Mesa 46:9 met 7:8 26:25 34:7 52:?3 69:24 middle 35:18 41:9 52:6 53:19 54:9 65:8,14 Mike 5:16 10:14 17:7 69:24 miles 35:9 61:1,3 Mi11er 5:12 million 20:19 35:5 mind 14:1 20:10 39:13 52:3 mioority 18:13 42:165:10 66:21 minute 24:8 minutes 8.24 9:1 9:12,2A 10:1,2,3 23:14 24:13 37:15 Micage 11:713:3 15:7 21:6 23:1 24:3 33:5 34:11 40:13,13 42:3 43:1 50:1,3,8,25 54:1158:8 60:i4 61:6 misled 69:1 mispronounce 43:8 misunderstood 71:19 mixed 64:7 mom 65:12 Moaday 1:13 2:19 4:1 mooey 2124 22:11 22:18,22 23:23 33:8,9 42:24 43:16,20 4b:3 63:17Q:12 71:12 monies 34:17 Monterey 6:1,13 1I:9 50:25 54:7 mout6s 511 morning 63:9 mother 42:12 57:21 motivated 17:17 move 20�1 3Q:13 41:11 43.25 452 45:3,4,9 61:10 62:24 moved 29:13 42:2 64:18 moving ZS:l I 44:14 N _.. ____ .-- N 15:6 name 1620 26:4 27:10 38:5,6 42:10 43:8,9 44:17 46:8 48:14 53:11 55:4 56:11 57:12 6021 63:5 64:15 65:23 75:19 Nancy 5:20 Nattve 59:22 nature 47:6,12,24 47:ZS near 12:6 30:19 nearest 66:13 need 13:2014:1I 27:19 39:13,13 4222 43:16,18 45:3,4 4b:1,2,22 47:3 48:9 54:4,5 58:9,10,13 60:13 b0:1S 61:5,6 65:16 73:1 needed 59:6 needless 41 � aeeds 12:2213:21 14:7 15:21 1b:9 18:1126:I0,12 46•?' 61:21 62:18,20,23 negative 8:15 11:11 15:5 oegotiating 35:8 negotiations 70:16 neighbor 59:23 61:16 66:16,i7 neig6bochoad 39:15 59:7,21,25 60:10 62:2 65:12 oeigLbors 323 55:?2 neit6er 75:15 NeUy 15:6 ncrvous 73:18 never 45:20 new 7:1120: i 26:25 32:19 33:12,13 42:19 42:22 46:18,18 51:6,7 58:8,I3 58:14 59:5 61:22 65:16 newly 36:I7 Newport 3:13 neat-door 59:Z3 nice 16:18 nickel ZS:12 uight 35:13 nine 17:1519:5 34:8 49:21 59:4 72:6,6,11 noise 3020 noaspecia117:23 nort6east 6:l4 note 70:23 aoted 1422 nnmber 22:4 2924 30:23 31:21 33:2137:16 38:4 47:17 56:19 73:12,14 numbers 7:12 122144:24 namerous 27:14 - --- �-- ---�-- oet6 75:10 objection 2s:s occnrred 11:19 otrer 28:17 o[fers 30:14 ot6ce 4:115:11, 2 S 5:19 46:25 50:15 69:9 72:5 73:10 ot5ccrs 63:15 ot'IIcials 28:8,23 Okay 26:3 38:1 7121 old 62:6 once 37:19 72:18 ones 15:17 41;8 ouliac 25:1 opea 9:9 54:7 opened 58:17 operate 21:11 operadans 30:9 opponeat 9:8 opponents 8:25 04/15/2002 9:23 1Q:2 32:4 37:7 op�rtunity 22:2,8 16:19 29:3 3b:lU 36:20 37.20 oppose 42:12 opposed 39:16 48:22 opposing 38:15 oppasition 16:14 39:157:25 59:18 optiona147:13 order 4:4 9:6,21 12:2014:10 38:2 45:2 organization 1:2 2:S 4:13 8:22 69:7 organized 7:14 Otientals 59:24 origin 17:21 oreginal 7:18 originally 4:9 6:18 Ortega 31:14,15 31:15 36:1 ought 25:9 ourseif 3823 outcome 10:25 ontset 13:12 outside 22:23 �3:1 avercrowded 42:17 51:20 52:1 52:7 54:9,10,14 58:15,16 ove:rrowding 27:25 40:1 44:24 45:5 53:2 overlap 30:7 ove�populated 42:18 overvk�v 6:4 owners 8:11 49:7 O'Donnel13:7 4:6 4:22,23 PaciBc 6:15 Pnge 18:7 paid 22:21 49:8 Palm 1:2,12 2:5,16 2:I7 4:1,11 S:ZS 6:6,8,18,29 823 10:6,9,21,23 11:3,7,11,19 12:13,22,24 13:1 13:2,2,3 15:18 1622172 18:10 18:18 19:13,16 19•?133:2,6,11 25:2,18,20,25 26:5,21,23 27:13 27:15 28:16 29:IZ,16,1 S,Zl 30:1,4 31:14,16 Page 5 Esquire Depositioa Services 714.834.1571 Transcript of Proceeding,s 53:13 reject 39:2 48:7,11 ected 40:16 Iationsh�p 33:10 Rlative ?5:16 rekvant 73:3 reltef 27:24 relieve 42:20 relying 39S nmain 32:21 remembcr 22:5 24:23 32:6 55:19 nmind 29:5 remode135:i6,17 35:17 remodeled 35:5 remodeting 35:19 RENE 3:5 rent 63:?2 reated 64:19,23 reorganization 7:29,22,25 83,5 8:8,14,18 report 16:2519:3 20:20 34:12,12 34:25�22 36:21 36:24 37:1,2 Reported 1:22 Reporter 220 75:6 reports 24:19 represent 15Z3 28:Z3 58:2,3 repcesentatioa �61:15 I'lpI�CSlD�t10US 51:4 rcpresentative 17:9 representatives 34:4 reqaest 27:25 32:2 37:13 71:10 requesting 6:19 reqnesta 6:� reqeired 39Z1 research 41:18 researched 72:8 resent 61:?S 67:23 reserre 13:18 resident 29:12 48:20 residents 31.24 35:14 39:9,10 62:11,19,20 resolution 6:5,1$ 17:2 28:20,20 31:23,24 39:1 resolve 47:3,4 ragec!lt�l!}� 18:21 i9:2 respective 70:21 72:15 responsibllities � 33:14 34:19 responsibility 3322 342 responsible 36:22 rest 145,9 Restrnom 47S result 7:16,23 8:6,9 39:1 � as:i retnrned 11:15 29.24 revenues 33:25 reve�se 3$:2 ceversed 9:22 review 36:19 37:1 reviewed 10:19 31:3 reviewiag 11:25 Rlbbon 43:12 48:18 ric6 54:19 right 5:22,18 6:15 13:18 23:17,18 23:19 24:5,11 35:7 40:20,24 44:14 51:19 53:21 652 69:2 69:1b 70:1b rig6ts 62:22 ripple 28:14 Itiveraide 1:12:4 4:1210:1414:13 28:19 59:168:18 69:9 72:2 73:11 rosd 14:5 42:11 43:10 51:14 Robert 3:7,7 4:5 roll 4:14 room 47:3 56:21 56:22 58:18 round 39:25 row 5:13 ruk 43:7 rules 8:19 37:14 running 14:17 � S 42:23 48:19 49:5 SAB 20:2 sad 62:16 saddens 66:4,7 b72 safety 47:25 saks 50:15 San 44:18 Sands 4:9 6:1,9,20 10:22,23 I1:1,10 11:18 12:16 13:1218:14 20:8 20:10 : 2:7�19 ZS:4,7 27:16 33:9,13,23 35:8 383 41:6 49:2 55:18,21,23 57:15 58:17 60:16 62:11,23 69:5 71:18,18 sat 46:12 67:5 saw 14:15 23:25 saying 15:4 51:21 67:4 seys i8:f,2 31:24 32:7 43:I6 63:18 acary 52:5 schoo11:1,2 2:4,5 2:16 4:10,11,13 5:25 6:1,8,9,20 6:218:6,12,12 10:6,9,11,22,22 11:1,7,10,12,18 12:6,9,16,18,?3 13:13 14:7,17,20 15:2,16,19,2.3 16:2218:10,14 19:13,17 20:17 2Q:19 21:12,14 21:14,2122:7 233,7,11 24:18 24:19,23 25:3,5 25:22,25 26:24 26:24 27:3,6,13 27:1b 28:2,3,16 29:16,18,19,20 30:2,12,25 31:1 31:7,25 32:1,10 32:11,15,22 33:9 33:13,14,23 34:14 35:2,4,6,9 35:12,16,18 37:9 38:3,24 39:6 40:5,14 41:6,20 41:23 42:15,17 42:19,2143:2,4 43:Q 44:1,2,5,20 4421 45:8,12,15 46:11,14,2148:2 48:5,8,10,17,21 49:2,6,7 50:16 50:19,2151:7,20 51:25 52:6,G,7 53:25,19,20 54:2 54:2,6,8,24,25 55:10,18,21,24 56:6,7 57:15 582,22 60:5,7,8 61:2,3,11,12,17 61:23 62:8,10,18 63:8,14 64:1,5 65:1,2,4,8,8,11 65:14,14,15 69:7 69:8,19 70:13,15 70:21 '72:15 73:19 sctsooliad 26:11 schools 3:11 6:5 12:7,1713:6,10 13:1414:2 25:7 29:8 20:11 21:10 22:16,25 23:2,8 23:20 24:2,5 25:1,5,1126:8 26:14,24 2'7:13 32:19,24 35:15 35:18 39:23 40:4 41:7,8,9,10,17,18 42:22,25 44:23 453,21,24 50:12 53:24,25 54:5,9 54:12,13,24 5523 56:15,21 56:?3 5722,23 58:8,9,13,14,16 59:5.6,7 60:12 60:15,?S 61:5,19 61:25 62:4,5,15 65:4,16,18 67:16 73:20 sciences 46:23 aeamle.ss 30:10 second 9:16,22 35:1 Section 6:25 7:9 72:24 Sections 72:25 security 47:25 see 11:2013:18 24:24 41:4 42:19 45:2,8,17,18 52:75 53:2 seeing 17:10 segcegated 66:21 segrcgation �:21 18:1 selecting 26.23 �u zz:io,�9,�0 aend 41:6 62:7 sending 41:19 sease 15:2138:25 sensitive 16:7 seut 28:19 Separate 20:7 Scpulveda 4:2! serve 14:2 4b:1 61:13 served 15:1916:3 31:25 48:16,17 48:18 60:18 serves 60:17 services 3:9 16:12 31:1,8 33:11 servicing 15:24 serving 34:3 452A 61:12 sessFon 38:10 set 43:14 ?5:8 seven 42:14 seventh 57:7 Slsas�oQ 64:? 4,15 share 2725 29:4 30:5 48:2a shsred 40:22 Shat�en 3:9 4:14 73:15 Sharqawi 65:22,23 65:23 5herry 10:13 Sbcenberger i0:14 26:14,20,20 shopping 41:4 short 35:2,2 37:4 48:23 65:25 shorthand 2:20 18:8 75:5,12 shrink 47:17 sickened 6619 side 9:15,18 24:9 54:12 sides 9:13820 signed 6:5 sigoi6caot 8:6,4 ?2:2 sign[ticantly 8:1 signing 24:22 siknt 423 similar 32:6 36:11 aimpk 27:18 32:7 simply 14:10 Sinatra 6:2,1411:4 sincere 22:24 sincereiy 25:9 singk 57:2 sit 67:17 site 9:18 44:22 50:25 61:14 62:21 69:8,8 72:16 sites 21:5 26:23 33:2,2,3,4,b sittiog 66:2U situation 30:25 38:?3 39:15 41:13,22 49:9 57:16 61:7,18 65:9 situatlous 41:1 44:24 six 61:1164:19 sae 35:4 sizes 27:23 sleughtered 63:17 sleep 66:18 slip 9:10 37:22 slips 9:2 smali 11:5 16:7 52:17 58:5,5 59:2 66:22 s�au�2l:ia z3:s smaUer-sized 21:10 SmitL 25:15,26 soccer 56:4 socss!!y 28:6 soW 24:1,1,215Q:9 so6d 13:20 Sobmon 49:24,25 49:25 soive 46:19 04/15/2002 somebody 12;19 34:1 somebody's 17:21 son 27:12 65:13 soaoer 22:17 24:5 socry 73:17 sort 45:21 sound 8:3 13:19 32� 36:20 43:19 53:14 souW 6:13 southwest 6:15 space 4624 47:1,3 47:16 spesk 3i:19 37:21 �36:17 53:10 57:19,20 59:17 64:18 65:21 68:16 72:20 speakers 9:2129:7 speeker's 37:13 apealdng 48:20 speciai 17:?2 32:14 apecialty 46:21 specl8cally 26:6 32:18 72:3 spcnd 11:25 43:21 Spiegel 31:19 34:23�25 spi�rit 62:12 splintered 62:1 split 41:17 spoke 21:7 25:9 38:21 53:11 59:15 70:1 spoken 48:23 522 61:26 sports 52:11 60:9 62:15 67:i6 apread 27:25 Springs 1:2,12 2;5 2:16,17 4:1,11 5:25 6:8,19 20:6 10:9,21,2411:3 11:7,1212:22,24 13:I,2,2,4 16:22 18:10,18 19:13 19:17 Z3:3,7,11 25:3,25 265,21 27:13 28:16 29:12,1b,18�21 30:1,4 32:15,22 33:2 37:8 38:24 39:b 40:4,14 41:23 42:I5 43:3 43:25 44:145:22 48:15,20 49:6 50:12,19 51:4,15 S1:1Q 52:10,21 52:24 53:25 55:9 55:10 58:2 61:11 62:17 63:8,25 67:4,20 7I:18 stati 5:1124:19 Page 7 �squue Deposition Services 714.834.1571 Transcript of Proceedings 50:3 58:10 64:19 64:22 Valpareiso 48:15 alue 22:12 values 8:10 223 various 39:5 vast 60:17 venue 47:10 verbatim 75:10 versus 44:l4 Vetetsn'a 29:23 viable 49:5 Victorie 50:6 view 9:1413:15,20 14:4 4b:9 51:8,9 viewed 18:3 vitiated 19Z0 voca142:165:10 volces 57:25 59:9 volatile 38:12 votc 19:18 20:25 32:14�17,23 39:20 49:158:21 66:7 voted 6:22 20:9,12 72:12 voter 58:21 voters 14:1 19:16 20:?A A3:15 w wa�er 66:7 �waeting 65:6 ►aIk 49:2 wallcing 12:9 want 12:Z,25 13:11 14:3 15:15,16 16:6 17:10,20 25:16 30:19 32:4 37:4 38:1139:19 41:12 45:2 50:15 50:17 53:22 56:6 60:4�7,8,21,15 62:1,8,24 64S 65:14,17 67:11 68:23 69:173:1 wented 29:10 32:24 41:7,9 48:24 53:13 64:21 73:16 wanting 59:16 wants 34:11 62:20 Waahington 65:5,5 waso't 20:11 49:14 54:15 b9:12 water 30:11 wsy 2:1710:25 14:15,23 15:1 32:13 38:1� d3:7 53:3 54:5 55:4 63:18 67:13,20 ways 23:16 62:4 wd► 61:14 6221 �weekend 29:25 57:3 weekends 35:14 wceks 702 welrnme 60:3 wel!-rounded 52:22 went 11:1 29:20 41:4 43:15 66.2 b6:i8 weren't 73:7 west 6:12 54:6 western 11:4 35:16 we're 16:1 we've 19:Z3 WHEREOF 75:18 white 22:10 54Z0 66:15,16 Whidey 68:7,7 Whitlinger 3b:8,9 w6okheartedly 32:3 WQ.ES 3:12 William 29:1 willing 53:1 Winters 5:16,17 I7:7,818:6 36:21,25 69:24 69:ZS wish 2524 3'7:16 38:16 52:1 wisbes 552 wishing 73:2 WITNESS 75:18 witneg.�es 75:9 WOMAN 73:6,13 73:26 wonder 22.2i Woodward 59:13 63:6 work 29:18,19 33:18 45:12 53:1 72:4 worldng 51:4 Workman 15:6 42:I4 44:22 51:16 world 66:8,11 worse 17:22 52:8 wouldn't 64:9 wrong 61:2168:19 wrote 25:18 year 42:23 45:10 69:23 years 12:20,20 13:24 18:11 26:1124:15 35:3 35:7 42:1 �1 d3:24 43:24 44:7 46:12 46:15 50:18 51:6 53:15 54:23 57:16,17 61:11 64:19,20 YMCA 56:2 YMCAs 62:14 yonag 16:11 6421 youW 27:21 62:14 62:15 zoned 24:18 7sa 29:9,9 $100,00019:14 S15,000 20:18 52019:15 $22,000 21:13 5300,00019:15 S35 20:8 536,000 21:13,21 S40 35:5 $6019:16 S62 i4:14 S7S 20:19 $8319:14 17:11 11:16 10 6:26 10-year-old 27:12 10.2 61:1 100 56:20 58:4,13 1171:23 11:43 63:8 12 29:15 120 7.2 68:15 69:20,21 13 32:7�7 13t6 7:3 14year-old 27:12 IS 1:13 2:19 4:1 29:15 15th 17:4 150 64:1 6622 150-plus 40:19 158 56:18 63:23 I7th 57:8 1963 55:9 1989 55:15 199410:2011:11 13:7 31:4 39:4,4 40:16,17 199811:13 22:9 z----- -� 2 7:13 20 8:24 9:1,24 20:1 11:6 18:19 20tL 6:22 49:11 200019:18 200111:16,20 20021:13 2:19 4:1 6:22 7:3 25:21 2003 62:7 2004 26:5 2010 35:3 53:17 57:7 67:9 70:11 22,00014:17,19,20 16:10 21:21 2200 6:1120:16 225011:2 2514:18 25,00014:18 25-year 29:12 2500 I4:18 45:11 275-home 50:24 3 7:1610:2,3 49:22 49:25 3,000 20:14,15 21:73 46:15,16 3-2163:8 3:� 67:17 3:20 67:18 3018:15,22 20:19 30,OQ0 Ab:16 30-minute 10:2,4 3125145 72:25 34 32:12 35 50:11 3S0-ho�ae 50:6 35705 b:25 35709 7:9 3571U 7:10 37222 40:12 37624 65:24 3764� 56:12 37735 55:13 37787 64:16 37884 25:18 37930 6022 38 32:12 --a -- - 4 7:19 4922 4,000 22:8 4year-old 62:6 4:0012:1 4:20 67:19 40 50:11 40U 58:3 4920 3:13 ---�-___. ---- 5 7:?2 72:25,25~ 5,000 2(?:18 2122 ?2:4 33:15,16,20 540113 5494Z 72:24 5S8 56:25 56521:24 2:21 75:25 5818:19 599724B 1:25 -�--- -- -6--- 6 7:25 212 49:22 6tL 42:13 6,000 33:20 60 20:3 644-8068 3:14 68395 43:10 68693 51:13 68695 44:18 68700 38:7 68730 42:11 --- .._..,�---- 7 8:518:7 61:2 7:42 2:18 4:2 �zi2i �z:�s 72870 46:9 73520 63:6 73540 59:13 73590 57:13 7362155:5 � 8 8:8 49:22 50:21 51:7 8W 25:21 8,000 20:16 8-month 62:6 8018:12,18 826-644$ 73:12 9 8:14 49:22 9:28 2:18 4:2 90 50:9 909 73:12 9219:18 92660 3:13 9419:19 949 3:14 96 55:16 9775 48:15 980 2:16 99 55:2 04/15/2002 Page 9 Esquire Deposition Services 714.834.1571 ATTACHMENT 26 C omments Re arding g Territory Transfer Analysis including an Analysis of Education Code Section 35753(a) {dated July 2002) as prepared for Riverside County Committee On School District Organization Prepared by: Palm Springs Unifed School District July , 2002 Comments Regarding Territory Transfer Analysis including an Analysis of Education Code Section 35753(a) (dated July 2002) as prepared for Riverside County Committee On School District Organization The Riverside County Committee on School District Organization ("Committee") is vested with the responsibility of ensuring that requests for transfer of territory between neighboring school districts comply with each and every one of nine listed conditions outlined in Education Code ("EC") Section 35753(a). Compliance is measured in the form of an evaluation of each criteria to determine if each criteria is "substantially met." If any single criteria is not substantially met, statute requires that the proposed territory vansfer must be denied. On July 31, 2002 the Committee will consider findings of a report prepared by Caldwell Flores Winters ("CFW Report") in which the criteria in EC 35753 are evaIuated for the proposed transfer of temtory from Palm Springs Unified School District ("PSUSD" or "District") to Desert Sands Unified School District ("DSUSD"). In summary, the CFW Report finds that two of the nine criteria are not met. Therefore, the CFW Report concurs with the findings of PSUSD as outlined in its April I5, 2002 Evaluation of Compliance report the Committee must deny the proposed transfer of territory as required by law. We believe that the CFW Repori does not consider alt of the impacts of the proposed Territory Transfer and should find that fve of the nine criterion aze not substantially met. Specific comments related to the CFW Report and evaluation of five specific criterion are provided below: Education Code 35753(a}{4} "The reorganization of the districts will promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation." Z'his criterion requires that "reorganization of the districts will not promote racial or ethnic discrimination or segregation." Important facts related to this criterion include: t. The CFW Report clearly outlines the requirement that analysis of this criterion look at "affected schools" as well as "possible futwe growth or change in the total population ... in each school." However, the CFW Report does not analyze school-specific differences in racial profile of affected schools and fails to analyze future trends in affected schoois which will be impacted by the proposed territory transfer. The CFW Report does not provide the complete analysis necessary to make a determination regarding EC 35753(a)(4). 2. Sections 7 and 9 of the CFW Report analyze the impact of existing students and long-term buildout of the proposed transfer territory. However, in evaluation of EC 35753(a)(4) the CFW Report only evaluates the impact of transferring an existing 18 students between Page 1 of 9 omvrzooz io as nM districts. In Section (7) the CFW Report estimates that the territory transfer will add 2,752 students to DSUSD. To meet statutory requirements, the County Committee must evaluate the impact on racial and ethnic balance from the transfer of 2,752 students from PSUSD to DSUSD. 3. The CFW Report analysis of 18 students does not take into account students on authorized and unauthorized interdistrict transfers attending DSUSD schools who might be tumed away from DSUSD at any time because of the severe lack of facilities available for interdistrict transfers into DSUSD. 4. The CFW Report identifies the affected schools which will serve the Transfer Area. However, the CFW Report fails to identify how the proposed Territory Transfer will change the ethnic balance of those affected schools. In summary the figwes from the CFW Report show the following: Affected schools in DSUSD have 69.75% white student population Affected schools in PSUSD have 27.78% white student population Transfer Area has 66.67% white student population Transfer Area is projected to generate 2,752 students 5. The CFW Report did identify data (above) which have significant implications on racial/ethnic balance of both the affected districis and affected schoois. �Iowever, the C�W Report did not evaluate the future trends as applied to the affected school populations in order to quantify the impacts. Evaluation of Ehe data yields the following important findings: Adding 2,752 students-66.7% whit�to DSUSD results in an 11% iacrease district-wide in percentage of white students in DSUSD compared to not having t6e territory transfer Losing 2,752 students—�6.7% white—lrom PSUSD results in a 12% decrease district-wide in percentage of white students in PSUSD compared to not having the territary transfer 6. The affected schools are also impacted significantly if the Territory Transfer is approved. White population in the impacted schools at DSUSD will mosi likely exceed 70 percent of student population and at PSUSD will continue to fall below 28 percent of student population at impacted schools. If the Transfer Proposal is denied, white population at impacted schools in DSUSD will most likely stay above 70 percent and at PSUSD will most increase to 43 percent. Approval of the Transfer Proposal perpetuates an unhealthy ethnic balance at impacted schools. By denying the Transfer Proposal the County Committee can help ensure that segregation is not perpetuated at the impact schools. The Transfer Prvposal clearly would create irreversible long-term racial discrimination by segregating the existing minority population. 7. CFW Report does not identify the fact that the Ciq� of Palm Desert partion of DSUSD is predominantly white and is not consistent with the overall racial profile of DSUSD as presented in Table IV — 1 of the CFW Report. The affected schools have 70% white students. The remainder of DSUSD has 25.44% white students. In other words, the proposed Transfer Area represents an existing, segregated, predominandy white subset of Page 2 of 9 o�n_9nooz io as a�t DSUSD. The Transfer Proposal would further segregate that area at the expense of the affected minority schools in Palm Springs Unified School District. PSUSD has a long-range plan which includes providing new middle school and high school capacity within the eastern portion of the District. Existing and future students from the Transfer Area will attend these new schools, which will be located on newly identified school sites within the Transfer Area. Since students from the Transfer Area are projected to be predominately non-minority, removal of these non-minority students from PSUSD boundaries will irreparably harm the district's ethnic balance, thereby promoting racial and ethnic segregation within PSUSD. If approved, the Transfer Proposal would be a major setback with respect to PSUSD's voluntary plans to alleviate segregation in the eastern portion of its boundaries. 9. The CFW Report indicates that bussing can be used to raciaily balance schools as long as District-wide racial balance is acceptable. This is obviously not the current practice for DSUSD where schools in the City of Palm Desert are predominantly white. Furthermore, this ignores the fact that bussing students is not always a practical or safe solution to achieve racial balance at specific school sites. PSUSD feels that achieving an appropriate racial balance will be attained in the eastem portion of PSUSD if the Transfer Proposal is denied. 10. PSUSD's curriculum and faculty culture incorporate a diversity program which helps students and faculty benefit from the diversity of its student population. The proposed Territory Transfer would undermine the diversity component of PSUSD's curriculum. If approved, the Transfer Proposal will result in a reduced proportion of minority students at predominately non-minority schools in DSUSD (in the City of Palm Desert) and a significant increase in the proportion of minority students at predominately minority exisdng schools in PSUSD and proposed schools within PSUSD. The Transfer Proposal's removal of anticipated student population from the Transfer Area will promote racial and ethnic segregation in the schools of the Palm Springs Unified School District and Desert Sands Unified School District. EC 35'753(a)(4} requires tt�at a ethnic segregation must not result from a transfer proposai, regardless of its cause. Isolating and transferring predominantly white housing subdivision out of the eastern portion of PSUSD perpetuates segregation. Ability of PSUSD to pursue a facilities master plan which desegregates will be impaired by the proposed transfer. Analysis of EC 35753(a)(4} which takes into accaunt the trenc�s in enrollment and affects on specific schools—as required by law—finds that requrrements of EC 35753(a)(4) are not substantially met. Education Code 35753(a)(6) "The proposed reorganization will significantly disrupt the educational programs in the proposed districts and districts affected by the proposed reorganization and will not promote sound education performance in those districts." Page 3 ot 9 o�a9nooz �o:as � This criterion is intended to ensure that the educational missions of the affected school districts will not be negatively impacted by a proposed reorganization either (i) district-wide and (ii) at any schooi sites. Approval of the ?'ransfer Proposal wilt disrupt PSUSD's long range faciiity master plan, and as a result, the District's educational programs. The Transfer Proposal would also reduce the ability of PSUSD to provide a full range of educational programs for students in ihe eastem portion of the District. Moreover, the Transfer Proposal will cause a multi-year delay in providing school facitities--for the Transfer Area and the Rancho Mirage and Thousand Palms areas—resulting in significant disruptions in educational programs for PSUSD. The besE way to avoid significant disruptions to the educational programs of PSUSD is to deny the Transfer Proposal. Important facts related to this criterion include: 1. T'he CFW Report fails to look at the uItimate impact of the transfer proposal and instead focuses only on the existing 18 students within the Transfer Area. The CFW Report acknowledges that a long-run impact exists but does not quantify the impact or explain why the impact is acceptabie. Speciftcally: "Fulure programs to accommodate the future students that would live in the estrmated S, 800 additiona! dwelling u»its tha► are currently planned for the petition area could be impacted. This report, however, is focused on the existirrg students and programs." 2. The CFW Report minimizes the projected impact by stating that PSUSD and DSUSD can coordinate efforts to transition planning of new schools in the Transfer Territory from PSUSD to DSUSD. This would mitigate some of the impacts of the T'ransfer Proposal, but not the following: ➢ DSUSD is aIready 1-2 years behind schedule in planning for schools since homes are already under construction in the Transfer Territory ➢ No solution is provided to mitigate impacts on the eastem portion of PSUSD which was to be provided with additional capacity at new schools in the Transfer Area The CFW Report entirely skirts one of the primary flaws of the Transfer Proposal—it does aot create an equitable solution to provide aew schools for families in Rancho Mirage and Thousand Palms that have rightfully expected to attend new schools ia the Transfer Area. If PSUSD cannot provide schools within the Transfer Territory, it must identify new sites and restart the process for DTSC and CDE site approvals. This will cause a 2+ year delay in providing schools for families in the easiern portion of PSUSD but outside the transfer territory. This delay disrupts the educational programs for many students. 4. The CFW Report fails to discuss the impact of the Transfer Proposal on the educational program at a smatler high schoo! or middle school �vhich would result in tlie eastern portion of PSUSD. Operating smaller schools at a higher marginal cost means reduced marginal revenues otherwise available to enhance PSUSD educational programs. Furthermore, smaller schools cannot provide the opportunity to offer the same number of specialized advanced placement courses and the same broad educational offerings which would be Page 4 of 9 o�n9nooz io:as aM feasible at a larger school. Both of these outcomes disrupt the educational programs of PSUSD. 5. PSUSD's long-range facilities master plan provides for conswction of a K-8 school and a high school in the eastern portion of the District, and the PSUSD has obtained and specifically designated local funding for those schools. Furthermore, the District recently met with the City of Palm Desert to identify appropriate sites within the Transfer Area for these schools. While the Transfer Proposal is pending, there will be a multi-year delay in provision of new school facilities for the T'ransfer Area and the Rancho Mirage and Thousand Palms areas. This delay wilt significantly disrupt the District's educational programs by contributing to overcrowding at Caihedral City school sites and increase racial and ethnic segregation. If the Transfer Pr�posal is not denied, there will be a rnulti-year delay in provision of new school facilities for the Transfer Area, resulting in significant disruptions in educational programs, will be caused no matter what the outcome of the Transfer Proposal. Such delay and disruptions will be caused for both affected school districts, since they will both have to "tread water" while the potential boundary adjustment is finalized. Such delay will also impact students at Cathedral City High School, Coffman Middle School, Workman Middle School, and Lindley Elementary Schoo) whi}e overcrowded conditions continue for longer time periods until new facilities plans can be created and implemented. 7. PSUSD is planning to build a fourth high school within the Transfer Territory and neaz the Califomia State University Campus. The high school will serve students from the Transfer Area and the eastem portion of PSUSD. Ff the Transfer Proposal is approved, the District will need to relocate that high school and downsize the high school to compensate for the loss of students from the 1'ransfer Area. Operating a smaller high school means that PSUSD will not have the opportunity to offer the lazge number of specialized advanced placement courses and the same broad educational offerings which would be feasible at a larger high school. This is an inequitable outcome of the Transfer Proposal and would disrupt the educational program for high schooi students in the Rancho Mirage and T'housand Palms areas. Approval of the Transfer Proposal will disrupt PSUSD's long range facility master plan, and as a resuIt, the District's educational programs. Moreover, the Transfer ProposaI will disrupt planning and provision of eciucational facilities and services for both districts, which have invested significant time and money in planning to provide educational services based on the existing district boundaries. The best wsy to avoid significant disruptions to the educationat programs of the affected school districts is to deay the Transfer Approval immediately. Educatian Code 35753(a){7) Page 5 of 9 o�rz9aooz io.as � "The proposed reorganization will result in a significant increase in school housing costs." 1. The CFW Report identifies that permanent facilities housing costs for 2,572 students from the Transfer Territory wil) cost an estimated $11.5 million more if the Transfer Proposal is approved. This represents a significant increase in school housing costs created by the proposed reorganization. 2. The CFW Report acknowledges that if the Transfer Proposal is ultimately approved, PSUSD will lose students in the eastem portion of its territory and will ultimately have to build marginally smaller schoot facilities at a higher cost per student due to a toss of economies of scale. The CFW Report fails to quantify the cost incresse. PSUSD estimates that an additiona125% per student for middle school costs and I S% per student for high school costs will be incurred for smaller-size schools, over $8.8 million for one middle school and high school. This represents a significant increase in school housing costs created by the proposed reorgani�ation. The affected school districts—PSUSD and DSUSD—will incur additional interim facilities costs to house students temporarily while the Transfer Proposal is considered and, if the 1"ransfer Proposal is approved, while the respective master pIans of each school district are revised and implemenEed. Interim housing for just 1,000 students for 2 years adds an additional $1 miltion to the school housing cost burden createcE by the proposed reorganization. Approval of the Transfer Proposal would result in a significant increase in school housing costs--over $21.3 million—due to the disruption of the comprehensive school facilities planning and construction program needed to provide facilities in the eastem portion of PSUSD. The Transfer Proposal does not substantially meet the requirement of EC 35753(a)(7}. Education Code 35753(a)(8) "The proposed reorganization is primarily designed to result in a significant increase in property values causing financial advantage to property owners because territory was transferred from one school district to an adjoining district." This criterion is intended to ensure that school district reorganization is not used as a means to enhance property values or income from real property. 'The Committee should take the following information into account and find that the requirement of EC 35753(a){8) is NOT substantially met for the following reasons: The CFW Rcpurt luok� at propeity values Citywide in eight citics wtithin cach schooI district. An analysis of citywide property values is misleading when appIied to evaluate whether property values in the transfer azea will be increased be transfer from PSUSD to DSUSD— but still within the City of Palm Desert. The data cites aze misleading because property values in adjoining cities do not provide any indicator as to how the value of property that is entirely within the City of Palm Desert will change if it is transferred from within PSUSD to Page 6 of 9 o�a9nooz �o.as nM DSUSD. Since property values wiihin the proposed transfer area relative to adjacent properties will be influenced by territory transfer, the appropriate way to determine if valuations will change is to examine the value of property within the proposed transfer area and within the City of Palm Desert ad�acent to the proposed transfer area. The straightforward question which must be asked: Will homes in the transfer azea be more valuable in DSUSD than in PSUSD? The answer is YES as of Apri12002 when a sample of 677 homes in the area was analyzed�. A sample of 156 single family dwelling units in the transfer azea—within PSUSI}—yielded an average assessed vaIuation of $ I 55,073 per dwelling unit ($97.49 per squaze foot). A sample of 52l single family dwelling units adjacent to the Vansfer area in the City of Pa1m Desert—within DSUSD—yielded an average assessed valuation of $27t,168 per dwelling unit ($124.78 per square foot). All 677 homes sampled in DSUSD and PSUSD are single family homes located within the northwest area of the City of Palm Desert. The difference in the homes is the school district in which they are located. However, the finding is clear that assessed valuation is 28% greater in DSUSD than in PSUSD within the same vicinity. Palm Desert within PSUSD $97.49/square foot Palm Desert within DSUSD 5124.78/square foot Valuation 28% higher within DSUSD The CFW Report failed to properly evaluate the change in property values that is expected as a result of the proposed territory transfer. The County Committee should find that the criterion in EC 35753(a)(8) is not substantially met on the basis that there is a signiiicant differential in property valuation betweea the school districts and that the transfer proposal is not primarily designed for educational purposes, rather, for tiie purpose of enhancing property owner and City revenues. 2. In its April 15, 2UO2 report and presentation to the County Committee, the District advised that the City of Palm Desert is attempting to gain more than 53.0 million per year in additional tax revenues from the Tettitary Transfer Area throvgh increases in property values, and that it appears that the transfer request is motivated by the desire to accelerate development in the azea which has not developed as anticipated over the pasi few years. It is apparent that the City of Palm Desert would have requested a territory transfer in the past except that the legal authority to request such a transfer was only recently provided in statute. The change in statutory authoriry to allow the City of Palm Desert to request a territory transfer and its desire to accelerate growth and generate tax revenues motivate the request for a territory transfer at this time. The City of Palm Desert and PaIm Desert Redevelopment Agency will benefit directly from increased property values because (i) effectively all the resulting increases in property tax revenucs in ihc Transfer Area «rilI be diverted to the Palm Desert Redevelopmeni Agency, and (ii} the associated increases in househoId income in the Transfer Area will result in more sales tax revenues generated for the City of Palm Desert. The City of Palm Desert � Based on assessed vatuation data provided by DetaQuick Cor specific homes. Page 7 of 9 o�a9noo2 to:as nM Redevelopment Agency ultimately stands to receive an additional $3.87 million per year resulting &om the increased property values. 3. The CFW Report fails to analyze the information provided by PSUSD with respect to (i} specific differences in property values and (ii) windfall of tax revenues to benefit the City of Palm Desert. The County Committee should incorporate the above information and information provided on April 15, 2Q02 in order to evaluate and determine that the proposed territory transfer does NOT substantially meet EC 35753(a}(8). 'Fhe Transfer Proposal does not seek to enhance the delivery of educational services within any of the affected districts. Rather, the Transfer Proposal is in effect part of the City of Palm Desert's economic development program and is intended to increase property values to developers and tax revenues to the City and its redevelopment agency. Hence, the Transfer ProposaI does not substantially meet the requirement of EC 35753(a)(8). Education Code 35753(a)(9) "The proposed reorganization will cause a substantial negative effect on the fiscal management or fiscal status of the proposed district or any existing district affected by the proposed reorganization." 1. The CFW Report states there will be no impact on future operating funds of PSUSD as a result of the proposeci reorganization. As outlined in PSUSD's April 15 Report, there is a true, negative impact on PSUSD's operating budget. If the 'Transfer Proposal is granted, PSUSD will lose significant "per pupil" operating funding from the State, resulting in a reduced ability for PSUSD to provide additional educational programs district-wide. PSUSD is funded at a revenue limit which averages approximately $4,650 per pupil. The mazginal operating cost of each school is lower than the average revenue generated by a pupil. Therefore, each mazginal student allows the District to operate more cost effectively by amortizing "fixed costs" over a larger pupil income base. If the marginal cost of operating a school equals $3,650 per pupil, then PSUSD will effectively lose $1,000 per pupil which would otherwise be available to provide enhanced educational programs and services. Loss of the Transfer Territory wil) therefore create a real economic loss of $1.5 million to $2.0 million ner vear which PSUSD would otherwise receive to enhance its educational programs. 2. The proposed Territory Transfer might cause a loss of redevelopment revenues needed to fund a portion of PSUSD schoots at the same iime as causing PSUSD to construct smaller schools with less economies of scale in construction cost. This is a"double hit" which creates an extremely negative fiscal impact on the District. If the Territory Transfer is approved the District would be forced to pay a higher cost per student for facilities and a lower percentage (0%) from redevelopment funding. 3. PSUSD included funding for schools in the Transfer Territory within its 2000 G.O. bond program which was approved by all voters in PSUSD. Voters have made a 30-year financial commitment to provide school facilities in the Transfer Area and PSUSD has made a significant investments in planning for significant schools in the Transfer Area which benefit the entire eastern portion of PSUSD. The Transfer Proposal fails to acknowledge the Pege 8 of 9 07/29R042 10.45 AM commitment that PSUSD and all of its taxpayers has made to fund facilities in the Transfer Territory. The residents and students currently living in the Transfer Territory—and the educational services they receive—aze important to PSUSD; however, they should not be allowed to outweigh Ehe other residents and students within PSUSD that would be impacted by the 'Transfer Proposal. Approva! of the Transfer Proposal would force PSUSD to renege on its promise to provide schools in the Transfer Area and could create significant problems if voters are unwilling to approve future bond issues because of mistrust about whether facilities will actually be provided. 4. PSUSD will incur interim housing and additionat student iransportation costs and wiIl coniinue to have overcrowding conditions at the middle school and high schooi until its planned facilities program—including new schools in the Transfer Area--is implemented. If the Transfer Proposal is approved, these costs will increase significantly because a revised facilities master would need to be prepazed and implemented to deliver permanent schools in the most appropriate locations. Until the Transfer Proposal is denied these interim costs will continue because implementation of the existing facilities master plan will be delayed. Each dollar expended on interim housing costs represents one less dollar available to provide permanent facilities and creates a negative fiscai burden on PSUSD. 5. If the Territory Transfer is approved, all residents in PSUSD will pay higher taxes every year until existing G.O. bonds are repaid. It would be inequitable and unconstitutional for PSUSD residents to be subject to an outcome of higher taxes unless they are provided the opportunity to be part of the electorate which decides if the Temtory Transfer should be approved. The Transfer Proposal wiil cause four distinct negative fiscal impacts on PSUSD: ➢ Loss of marginal operating revenues for enhanced educational programs ➢ Expenditure of permanent facilities funding on interim facilities costs ➢ Higher cost per student to provide permanent facilities ➢ Potential loss of redevelopment pass-thraugh incame These negative fiscal impacts require that the County Committee find that the Transfer Proposal does not substantially meet the requirement of EC 35753(a}(9). Page 9 0( 9 07292002 10 45 AM