Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReport - FYE 06/30/2014 - Measure A Transportation FundCITY OF PALM DESERT FINANCE DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT REQUEST: RECEIVE AND FILE THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON AGREED -UPON PROCEDURES PERFORMED ON THE MEASURE A TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 DATE: February 26, 2015 SUBMITTED BY: Paul S. Gibson, Finance Director CONTENTS: Independent Accountants' Report on Agreed -Upon Procedures Recommendation By Minute Motion, that the City Council receive and file the Independent Accountants' Report on Agreed -Upon Procedures Performed on the Measure A Transportation Fund for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Committee Recommendation The Audit, Investment and Finance Committee received the Independent Accountants' Report at their February 24, 2015 meeting, and it was recommended that the report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 be received and filed by the City Council. Background The Measure A Fund is a special revenue fund that was created to keep track of funds received by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. In 1988, Riverside County voters approved a half cent sales tax, known as Measure A, to fund a variety of highway improvements, local streets and roads maintenance, commuter assistance and specialized transit projects. Macias, Gini & O'Connell, LLP, performed the procedures which were agreed to by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Riverside, California (RCTC) solely to assist RCTC with respect to an evaluation of the City of Palm Desert's Measure A Transportation Fund and degree of the City's compliance with RCTC requirements for the year ended June 30, 2014. Staff requests that the Council receive and file the Independent Accountants' Report on Agreed -Upon Procedures Performed on the Measure A Transportation Fund for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. G:\Finance\Niamh Ortega\Staff Reports\Audit staff reports\Audit Staff Reports 2014\SR - Council audit 2014 Measure A docx Staff Report Approval of Report on Procedures for Measure A Fund for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2014 February 26, 2015 Page 2 of 2 Fiscal Impact There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Submitted by: Paul S. Gi o ohn M. Wohlmuth Finance D e or/City Treasurer City Manager G:\Finance\Niamh Ortega\Staff Reports\Audit staff reports\Audit Staff Reports 2014\SR - Council audit 2014 Measure A.docx Newport Beach Certified Public Accountants. S:,cr,m-ento W„Inut Creek Independent Accountant's Report Oakland On Applying Agreed -Upon Procedures LA/Century City The Board of Commissioners San D ego Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California Seattle We have performed the procedures enumerated below, which were agreed to by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC), solely to assist RCTC in determining whether the City of Palm Desert, California (City), was in compliance with the Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program grant terms and conditions for the year ended June 30, 2014. The City's management is responsible for the accounting records. This agreed -upon procedures engagement was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The sufficiency of these procedures is solely the responsibility of those parties specified in the report. Consequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described below, either for the purpose for which this report has been requested, or for any other purpose. Our procedures and findings are as follows: Obtain the 2009 Measure A (Ordinance 02-001) compliance requirements. Western County jurisdictions are required to participate in the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program and in the Multi -Species habitat Conservation Plan (MSIICP), which are administered by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), respectively. Coachella Valley jurisdictions are required to participate in the TUMF program administered by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure. The City participates in the TUMF program administered by CVAG. 2. Obtain the City's approved Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) from RCTC for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure. 3. Obtain a detailed general ledger and balance sheet from the City for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. a. Identify the amount of Measure A cash and investments recorded at June 30, 2014. Compare amount to Measure A fund balance and provide an explanation for any difference greater than 25% of fund balance. Finding: Measure A cash and investments were $19,278,099 at June 30, 2014. The difference between Measure A cash and investments of $19,278,099 and fund balance of $18,538,244 is $739,855 or 3.99%. WW m.gocpa r:m b. Identify amounts due from other funds. Finding: There were no amounts due from other funds as of June 30, 2014. c. Identify the components of ending fund balance for Measure A activity. Finding: The Measure A fund balance as of June 30, 2014 was $18,538,244 and is comprised of: a restricted fund balance of $18,538,244. d. Identify the existence of any restatement of Measure A fund balance and inquire of management as to the reason for any restatement. Finding: We noted no restatement of Measure A fund balance at June 30, 2013. 4. Obtain an operating statement for Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 (see Exhibit A), including budget amounts. a. Review the revenues in the operating statement. i. Inquire of' management as to what fund was used to record Measure A revenues received from RCTC and document total revenues for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Finding: The City accounts for Measure A revenues in its Measure A Fund (Fund #213). The City recorded total revenues in the amount of $3,416,025 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, which includes $75,480 of federal grants, $710,848 of reimbursements from other agencies, and $87,345 of investment income. ii. Obtain a listing of Measure A payments made from RCTC to the City. Compare the Measure A revenues recorded by the City to the listing of payments made by RCTC. Finding: We identified a variance of $685 between the Measure A revenues recorded by the City and the RCTC Measure A payment schedule. The difference is due to a fiscal year 2013 adjustment from RCTC, in the amount of $68,827, recorded by the City in fiscal year 2014, and a fiscal year 2014 adjustment from RCTC, in the amount of' $69,512, to be recorded by the City in fiscal year 2015. The following schedule summarizes these differences. Measure A revenue recorded 2013 clean-up adjustment 2014 clean-up adjustment City of RCTC Palm Desert $ 2,543,037 $ 2,542,352 $ (68,827) - 69,512 Measure A revenue reconciled $ 2.543,037 $ 2,543,037 iii. Determine the amount of interest allocated to Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Finding: The City allocated interest in the amount of $87,345 to Measure A activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. 2 b. Review the expenditures in the operating statement. i. Inquire of management as to what fund is used to record Measure A expenditures and document total expenditures for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Finding: The City accounts for Measure A expenditures in its Measure A Fund (Fund 4213). The City recorded total Measure A expenditures in the amount of $7,863,829 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. ii. Select expenditures for testing that comprise at least 20% of total Measure A expenditures. Finding: The City recorded Measure A expenditures in the amount of $7,863,829. We selected $1,918,855 or 24.4%, for testing. 1. For the expenditures selected for testing, compare the dollar amount recorded in the general ledger to the supporting documentation. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure. 2. For the expenditures selected for testing, review the Five -Year CIP and note whether the projects claimed were included in the Five -Year CIP and whether they constitute allowable costs. Finding: The expenditures selected for testing were included in the Five -Year CIP and were allowable costs. No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure. iii. Inquire of management as to the nature of any transfers recorded in the Measure A Fund. Finding: We noted no transfers in the Measure A Fund for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. iv. Inquire of management as to the amount of indirect costs, if any, included in expenditures. If indirect costs exceed 8% of Measure A revenue, inquire of management as to the basis for indirect costs charged to Measure A. Finding: Per discussion with City management, no indirect costs were allocated to the Measure A Fund for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. 5. Compare budgeted expenditures to actual amounts and inquire of management as to the nature of significant variances. Finding: The following schedule compares budgeted expenditures to actual amounts. Budget Actual Variance Construction and maintenance S 20,774,012 $ 7,863,829 $ 12,910,183 3 Per discussion with City management, the variance in construction and maintenance was due to projects that were either not started or were in the beginning stages at year end June 30, 2014. 6. Obtain from RCTC a listing of jurisdictions that participate in the Western County or Coachella Valley TUMF programs. a. If the jurisdiction is a participant in the TUMF program, select at least one disbursement for validation as to the amount remitted to WRCOG or CVAG, as applicable. Finding: We selected one disbursement in the amount of' $82,902. The payment selected for testing indicated that TUMF is collected and remitted to CVAG, as required. b. Indicate the total amount of TUMF fees collected and remitted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. Finding: The total amount of TUMF fees collected and remitted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, was $541,531. 7. Obtain from RCTC a listing of jurisdictions that participate in the Western County MSHCP program. a. It' the jurisdiction is a participant in the Western County MSHCP program, select at least one disbursement for validation as to the amount remitted to RCA. Finding: The City is not a participant in the Western County MSHCP program. b. Inquire of management as to the existence of fees collected in prior years that were not remitted to RCA by the end of this fiscal year. Finding: Tile City is not a participant in the Western County MSHCP program. c. Indicate the total amount of Western County MSHCP fees collected and remitted during the fiscal year. Finding: The City is not a participant in the Western County MSHCP program. 8. Obtain from RCTC the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base year requirement, including its supporting detail calculations for the City, and the carryover amount allowed as of July 1, 2013. a. Obtain from the City a calculation of' its current year MOF, amount in a format similar to its base year calculation. See Exhibit B. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure. b. Compare the current year MOE expenditures to the MOE base requirement. Finding: We noted that current year MOE expenditures were greater than the MOE base requirement. In c. Compare the amount of current year MOE expenditures to the MOE base requirement and add any excess to, or subtract any deficiency from the carryover amount. Finding: We noted that current year MOE expenditures of $3,200,290 were greater than the MOE base requirement of $2,398,146 resulting in an excess MOE of $802,144 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. d. If the amount of discretionary funds spent is less than the MOE base requirement (MOE deficiency), determine the amount of any prior year MOE carryover using the information obtained from RCTC, and reduce the MOE deficiency by any available MOE carryover to determine an adjusted current year expenditure amount. Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of applying this procedure. The City's discretionary funds spent in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, exceeded the MOE base year requirement. The City's MOf; carryover at June 30, 2014, is calculated as follows: MOE excess at July 1, 2013 $ 4,836,772 Current year MOE expenditures 3,200,290 Less: MOE base year requirement (2,398,146) F.xcess MO1; for fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 802,144 MOE excess at June 30, 2014 $ 5,638,916 We were not engaged to, and did not, conduct an audit, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion on the accounting records. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Hoard of Commissioners of RCTC and the City of Palm Desert and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. / / -/atlas Newport Beach, California December 30, 2014 5 CITY OF PALM DESERT Measure A Operating Statements For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014 (Unaudited) Revenues: Measure A Federal grants State grants Reimbursements from other agencies Investment income Total revenues Expenditures: Construction and maintenance Exhibit A Budget Actual Variance $ 2,478,000 $ 2,542,352 S 64,352 2,633,253 75,480 (2,557,773) 69,000 - (69,000) 2,870,000 710,848 (2,159,152) 45,000 87,345 42,345 8,095,253 3,416,025 (4,679,228) 20,774,012 7,863,829 12,910,183 Deficiency of revenues under expenditures $ (12,678,759) S (4,447,804) S 8,230,955 G1l m L C O ,-, v ^ V Ic M — = -IT Ic N -ITC N ^ of N N Ic Ic � Ic = 1` Mi N M O Ic M M M N ClC` 00 C` N N O �n I7 a, vq :a C y L O � t G C G Y y L u x � d � � Q L `o c 2, u u r• p U :O ^J .. y C ts L cJ OA .Q oil V V C R c u = E u > C C CC — F u u .�? u - c J ca C c u u :a c Q C te a C:E¢i 5 %✓ ls sP v ✓!✓ f W w 00 N P 00 N vi