The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2020-08-25 ARC Regular Meeting Agenda Packet CITY OF PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 25, 2020 12:30 P.M. City of Palm Desert, California (ZOOM VIRTUAL MEETING) I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 28, 2020 Note: In consideration of the current Coronavirus/COVID-19 Pandemic and pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Orders, Commissioners may participate via teleconference/Virtual Meeting. Any person wishing to discuss any item not otherwise on the agenda has the following options for public participation: Public comment may be received by email or voicemail from the time the agenda is posted up until one (1) hour prior to the posted time of meeting convening (12:30 p.m.). Emails received will be printed and distributed for the record prior to the meeting. If the sender so request they will be read into the record at the meeting not to exceed (3) minutes in length. Email: cityhall@cityofpalmdesert.org Voicemails will be forwarded to the Architectural Review Commissioners at or near the time they are received. If the sender so requests, they may also be saved and played at the appropriate point in the live meeting not to exceed three (3) minutes in length. Voicemail: 760-776-6409 Because the Brown Act does not allow the Architectural Review Commission to take action on items not on the Agenda, members may briefly respond or instead refer the matter to staff for report and recommendation at a future Architectural Review Commission meeting. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA August 25, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\Staff Reports\200825\1 Agenda 8-25-20.doc Page 2 of 3 V. CASES: A. Final Drawings 1. CASE NO: SARC 20-0006 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: PC/APDG PALM DESERT, LLC 130 Newport Center Drive, Suite 220, Newport Beach, CA 92660 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a 6’ monument sign; Avenida. LOCATION: 40-445 Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-5, S.O. 2. CASE NO: MISC 18-0018 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: AN OH, 73-444 Ironwood Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a material and height exception for two existing wooden 5'-10" gates, setback 14'-6" from the face of curb. LOCATION: 73-444 Ironwood Street ZONE: R-1, 20,000 B. Preliminary Plans 1. CASE NO: CUP 20-0007 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: SMARTLINK, 2033 San Elija Avenue #600, Cardiff, CA 92007 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a design review to construct a new 65’ wireless telecommunication facility designed as a palm tree. LOCATION: 73-750 Dinah Shore Drive ZONE: S.I. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA August 25, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\Staff Reports\200825\1 Agenda 8-25-20.doc Page 3 of 3 2. CASE NO: PP 19-0006 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: KOLA OLATUNBOSUN, 73-360 Catalina Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a design for a new single-story residential duplex. LOCATION: 73-721 San Nicholas Way ZONE: R-2 C. Miscellaneous Items None VI. COMMENTS VII. ADJOURNMENT Reports and documents relating to each of the following items listed on the agenda are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during normal business hours, Monday – Friday, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, 760/346-0611. ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* Declaration of Posting I, Janine Judy, Management Specialist I for the Department of Community Development of the City of Palm Desert, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION meeting of Tuesday, August 25, 2020 was posted on the bulletin board by the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, on Friday, August 21, 2020. Date: August 28, 2020 Janine Judy Recording Secretary CITY OF PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 28, 2020 (VIRTUAL ZOOM MEETING) I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 12:30 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Commissioners Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Chris Van Vliet, Chair X 9 2 Karel Lambell, Vice Chair X 10 1 Allan Levin X 11 Michael McAuliffe X 10 1 Jim McIntosh X 10 1 Jim Schmid X 10 1 John Vuksic X 10 1 Also Present Ryan Stendell, Director Community Development Eric Ceja, Principal Planner Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner Wayne Olson, Economic Dev. Janine Judy, Recording Secretary Cancelled meeting: 12/24/19, 3/10/20, 3/24/20, 4/14/20 III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 14, 2020 Action: Commissioner Levin moved to approve the July 14, 2020 meeting minutes with minor changes. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Lambell and carried by a 7-0 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh Schmid, Van Vliet, and Vuksic voting YES. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\Staff Reports\200825\2 Draft Minutes 7-28-20.docx Page 2 of 9 V. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: MISC 18-0018 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: AN OH, 73444 Ironwood Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a material and height exception for two existing wooden 5'- 10" gates, setback 14'-6" from the face of curb. LOCATION: 73444 Ironwood Street ZONE: R-1, 20,000 Mr. Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner, informed the Commission that the applicant for this project was not present on the Zoom call and recommended a continuance. However, the Commission wanted to see changes since the last meeting in 2018. This request was for a material and height exception for two (2) existing wooden gates, setback 14’-6” from the face of curb. This item previously appeared before them on October 23, 2018, as a response to a code compliance case. The gates are 5’-10” tall constructed from tubular steel and finished with stained wood. The Architectural Review Commission (ARC) believed the design was attractive and had strong architectural merit but ultimately continued the case citing height and compatibility concerns. The homeowner has made some changes to the exterior of the home; painting/repainting and replacing the entry door and are looking for an approval. The Commission recalled they had asked the applicant to tie the gate into the architecture of the house. However, they did not see any architectural changes to the home except for painting and changing the entry door. The entry door is not visible from the street and not compatible with the gate. They suggested the applicant incorporate details that would be visible from the street. Mr. Melloni said it may be challenging because the home is completely obstructed by the gate. So, applying the wood would not be as visible from the street unless the gate was open. The Commission discussed the setback issue. Mr. Melloni said from the previous meeting, the height and setback was the primary concern rather than the design and said gates of this height are a common feature in that area of south Palm Desert and felt it was interesting in that neighborhood. Mr. Melloni suggested they continue this to allow the applicant to be present. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\Staff Reports\200825\2 Draft Minutes 7-28-20.docx Page 3 of 9 ACTION: Commissioner Lambell moved to continue to allow applicant to be present at a future meeting. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Levin and carried by a 7- 0 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Schmid, Van Vliet, and Vuksic voting YES. B. Preliminary Plans 1. CASE NO: PP/CUP 20-0001 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: WILLIAM MALEY & CARLA LUNDAHL, 74923 Highway 111, Indian Wells, CA 92210 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to preliminarily approve construction of a two-story building with 12 condominium units on a vacant 13,125-square-foot lot located within the Downtown Edge Transition Overlay (DE-O) zone. LOCATION: 44-705 Deep Canyon Road ZONE: DE-O Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, presented preliminary plans for a precise plan/conditional use permit for a two-story building with 12 condominium units on a vacant 13,125-square-foot lot located within the Downtown Edge Transition Overlay (DE-O) zone on Deep Canyon Road (Deep Canyon). The project requires a recommendation from the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) for the project architecture and approval of a precise plan/conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. This proposal is a modern architectural style that incorporates arched entryways, pitched roofs, recessed windows and doors, single car garages and guest parking spaces. All units are one-bedroom and range in size from 590 to 1,250 square feet. The building incorporates roof decks for open spaces and maintains an overall roof height of 29’-5”. The landscaping design consists of a natural desert theme with native species requiring minimal water usage. The project as designed complies with all development standards, including parking, setbacks, density, lot coverage, land use compatibility, and building height (two-stories). The project also complies with the design guidelines of creating an urban development within the DE-O Zone as outlined in the Development Code. Staff recommends approval of the project architecture, subject to any comments made by the Commission. The Commission felt the guest parking spaces were too tight and suggested they be reconfigured. They reviewed the handicap parking and MR. MORRIS, architect, said they had to take one of the condo units and designate it as handicap then modified one of the guest parking spaces to accommodate a handicap van. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\Staff Reports\200825\2 Draft Minutes 7-28-20.docx Page 4 of 9 The Commission was concerned with how tight the driveway was and understands that the applicant is trying to maximize the site, but this may be maximized to a fault. They discussed the width of the parking spaces, how far they were from the wall and the landscape planter. They were concerned with how tight it would be turning in and out of the garages and said there was only a 9’ turning radius and it should be 11’. The Commission suggested they review the driveway width for an accurate turning radius into the garages, as well as the guest parking spaces and consider widening the garages for better vehicular clearance. The Commission was concerned with taking the hardscape right to the property line along such a long linear driveway. They pointed out that the applicant provided a vine that would be planted in only 12” of soil in a narrow area and felt it wouldn’t thrive on the surface of the wall. They asked the applicant to ensure there is sufficient room especially the landscape area adjacent to the last guest parking space, and the landscape area along the north wall. They also recommended they revise the landscape palette to incorporate plants that can thrive in the desert environment and review the footing issues with landscape planters adjacent to existing block walls to ensure they have the ability to grow plant material along that edge. The Commission discussed the number of trash containers placed on Deep Canyon every week for trash pickup and felt there were too many on such a small piece of land. They asked the applicant to review their trash pickup options with Burrtec and to consider a trash bin enclosure. The Commission reviewed the utility closet located on the front building façade that will locate cable, electrical and meters. The Commission suggested they reassess the location and the design of the utility closet, verify with the Fire Department regarding signage such as “Fire Risers” on the closet doors, and locating all utility meters and include them on the rendering. The Commission asked about the gas meters and the applicant explained they are 18” wide with the piping and are stacked three high. The Commission expressed concern with all the meters located in such a small alcove. They suggested including the stacked meters on the renderings to see how it affects the architecture as it may look industrial. The Commission questioned the gate on the east elevation which is a primary entrance into the property and close to one of the units. They suggested this area needs more interest to allow it to be a focal point of entry and diminish the importance of the central gate. This would allow for the east gate to become the primary entrance to the property, particularly for guests. The Commission reviewed the roof decks intended to be usable living space for the second-floor residents to give them some outdoor space. They asked the applicant to address any privacy issues for existing ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\Staff Reports\200825\2 Draft Minutes 7-28-20.docx Page 5 of 9 residential homes. They also had concerns with clutter on the patios and roof decks and inquired if this this could be avoided and enforced through the CC&Rs. They asked the applicant if they were providing drainage for the roof decks and Mr. Morris said there is an interior drain and a lower flow drain to connect to the drainage system outside and down into the gravel. The Commission reviewed the tall vertical elements on the roof that were very thin given the proportions of the overall elevation. They suggested combining both into a simple gable and not chopping it up and thickening the gable elements to get a front gable appearance on all elevations. This will quiet down the importance of the front door for the lower unit on the west elevation so it becomes more of a building feature and not a feature for that entrance. On the south elevation, there is some nice breakup of the facade with gable roofs with forms that come down to the ground, however on the north elevation it’s the same gable roofs, but they do not come down to the ground. It is just a big flat wall which will be very visible from the street, as well as the neighboring homes. It is important that all details are carried around the entire building so they are dealing with four-sided architecture, especially on the north elevation. The Commission discussed having deeper recesses on the garage doors by double framing the walls to create good shadow lines. They did not know if the project has the width to make that happen as the site is very tight, but these little details will transform the experience and quality of the project. In reference to the windows, they thought they needed additional depth and asked the applicant to use 2 x 2s on the windows to create 6” reveals. The Commission noticed that the office has a bigger floor space than the bedroom and questioned what would prevent that office from becoming a second bedroom. They suggested reviewing the dimensions of the office size compared to the bedroom size. The Commission is in favor of denser housing within the city but felt this site was tight and that it may be beyond the limit of what can be done there. They thought this building was too large for the site and suggested they look at removing a unit or two to provide enough room for architecture and site planning. ACTION: Commissioner Lambell moved to continue Case No. PP/CUP 20-0001 subject to: 1) review all landscaping areas to ensure that there is sufficient room. An example is the landscape area adjacent to the last guest parking space, and landscape area along the north wall; 2) review footing issues with landscape planters that are adjacent to existing block walls; 3) revise landscape palette to incorporate plants that can thrive in the desert environment; 4) review driveway width for vehicle turning radius into the garages and guest parking spaces; 5) deepen the garage doors to create strong shadow lines; 6) consider widening garages for better vehicular clearance; 7) guest parking spaces are too tight and need to be ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\Staff Reports\200825\2 Draft Minutes 7-28-20.docx Page 6 of 9 reconfigured; 8) verify with Fire Department the need of a turnaround for fire access; 9) review trash options with Burrtec Waste Management. Having 12 to 24 trash bins along Deep Canyon Drive is too many. Consider a trash enclosure; 10) locate all utility meters and apply them to the rendering, and locations shall have architectural merit; 11) re-assess the location and design of the utility closet on the front elevation. Verify with Fire Department regarding signage such as Fire Risers on utility closet doors; 12) the building architecture and elements needs to be carried around to all four-sides, especially to the north elevation; 13) review tightness of walkway between the building and A/C units on the west elevation; 14) consider relocating A/C unit on Unit 10, as it is too tight for the space; 15) the gate on the east elevation is the primary entrance into the property and needs more interest/emphasis to allow it to be a focal point of entry, and diminish the use of the central residential patio gate; 16) the architecture ridge lines are unsubtle. Consider vertical mass, and not chopping up the gable; 17) look at combining the tall thin vertical elements into a single gable; 18) thicken gable elements in order to get front gable appearance on all elevations; 18) gable needs to come down on the north elevation; 20) address any privacy issues from the roof decks for existing residential homes; 21) windows need additional depth. Consider using 2 x 2s on the windows to create 6” reveals; 22) submit rendering showing eave details; 23) materials board needs to reflect all exterior finishes, i.e. mechanical doors, mechanical screening, and gates;24) review dimensions of the office room sizes compared to the bedroom sizes. It appears easy to create a second bedroom; 25) consider what roof decks will look like with umbrellas and other objects. How to enforce them through CC&Rs to avoid patio clutter issues; 26) all sheets have inconsistencies and need to match from the grading plan to the site plan to the elevations. Provide the correct elevations, i.e. north, south, west, and east; 27) the building appears too large for the site. Look at removing a unit or two in order to provide enough room for architecture and site planning; and 28) consider building addresses and where those will be located. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Levin and carried by a 7-0 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Schmid, Van Vliet, and Vuksic. 2. CASE NO: PP 20-0002 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: NADEL ARCHITECTS, INC. 1990 S. Bundy Drive, Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA 90025 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to preliminarily approve demolition of the existing Pizza Hut building within the Neighborhood Walmart shopping center, and construct a new 7,500- square-foot retail/restaurant building with four (4) tenant suites. LOCATION: 72-310 Highway 111 ZONE: P.C.-(3) ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\Staff Reports\200825\2 Draft Minutes 7-28-20.docx Page 7 of 9 Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, presented a proposal for a precise plan for a new 7,500-square-foot restaurant/retail pad on Highway 111 near Fred Waring Drive (Fred Waring) to replace the Pizza Hut building that will be demolished. The new building will mimic the building that went up last year near the gas station on Fred Waring by using similar materials and details. Conditions will be applied to the back of the building to have store- front glazing facing Highway 111 to open it up and make it more inviting. He said there will be some discussion on how the service doors on Highway 111 will be screened. The Commission discussed the problems they went through with the newer building near this pad, especially with getting the tower elements to look like they are four-sided and screening the signs on the utility doors that face Fred Waring. They reviewed the plans for the new building and questioned how the service doors on the back side of the building will be screened since it is on a major street. Since this building will have restaurants with several service doors facing Highway 111, this area will end up with mats and other things being stored there. They asked the design team to consider giving up a little square footage and create some niches in the back and recess the doors to screen it better, as well as coming up with some sort of an architectural screening wall for that area along with landscaping in front to create a layered effect. This layered effect will complement the architecture and improve the tidiness of the site and be an asset rather than a perpetual visual liability. The Commission reviewed and discussed the landscape plan and said that all the plant choices in the back of house area are very short and felt they wouldn’t get two feet out of any of them. They suggested revising the plant palette to include taller plants. The Commission discussed the offsets on the building and suggested the tower elements have more offsets in the ground plane to have more offsets in the roof. They understand that the applicant is maximizing the building square footage, however it will be at the expense of the architecture. The Commission referred to the outdoor patio dining area and questioned the logic of how that looks out towards Walmart, as well as being adjacent to the trash enclosure. As the mountains are one of the biggest assets here in the valley, they suggested that the applicant consider rotating the building 90 degrees with the back of house facing the station. That way the outdoor patios would face southeast taking advantage of the mountains at the same time alleviating the problem with the back of house facing Highway 111. They discussed the footprint of the existing Pizza Hut building and what they were building within it. MR. DAVID ANDERSON, Nadel Architects, said they need more length than they do depth to maximize the square footage. The Commission was concerned that the design team was creating a potentially unsightly environment on the back ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\Staff Reports\200825\2 Draft Minutes 7-28-20.docx Page 8 of 9 of the building and thinks there are some fundamental design decisions that were made that is creating a lot of problems. The Commission and the applicant discussed the possibility of using the parking area to get the same length of building if they turn the building 90 degrees. MR. ANDERSON said this wouldn’t be possible as part of this parking lot is a parcel that the ownership cannot purchase. MR. RALPH DEPPISCH, development team, said they would also need approval by the association to build outside the internal property line. He said he would check to see how the arrangement was written and what they can do with the building footprint, the size, and dimensions of the building and how it can be oriented. MR. RON SKLEPKO, Civil Engineer, said to reorient the building they would have to do a lot line adjustment because of the shape of the parcel the current building sits in. The electrical and telephone lines will have to be relocated and the cost factor will have to be considered. The Commission feels that the applicant needs to give up some patio space to push that building back to create an architectural element along Highway 111. They understand there is an easement issue so the design team would have to configure the building a bit to give up some space in the northeast corner to push it up further so it’s not right on that setback along Highway 111 with all the back of house services. Commissioner McIntosh felt the Commission was spending a lot of time trying to fix problems in this design. Given the amount of time they spent on the back of house of the sister building on Fred Waring they ended up getting something that was very disappointing. Highway 111 is more than a street. It is the boulevard entrance into the city and Palm Desert already has a chronic problem with buildings that back up into this visual experience as you come from Rancho Mirage into Palm Desert. ACTION: Chair Van Vliet moved to continue Case No. SARC 20-0005 subject to: 1) Highway 111 (Hwy 111) is a main corridor into the City and the building should be oriented so the front of the building faces Hwy 111 and not the parking lot. This would allow the restaurants to have patios facing the mountains and not the trash enclosure/parking lot. Consider the back of the building facing the gas station; 2) if the back of the building faces Hwy 111, then consider relocating the kitchens and reduce the building square footage. This would allow the patios to front Hwy 111 and allow for additional architectural features that will create interest from Hwy 111; 3) the service doors need to be screened better with additional layering. If the building were to rotate with the back facing the gas station, this would help; 4) the tower elements need more offsets, as well as the rectangular elements; 5) the towers need to be more pronounced; 6) the entire building needs additional offsets as well; 7) balance the trellis to awning ratios; 8) carry all building forms so they are four-sided; 9) revise plant palette to include taller plants in some areas; and 10) ensure that all kitchen equipment on roof is screened properly with parapets. Motion was seconded by Commissioner McIntosh and carried by a 6-0-1 vote, with Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Schmid, Van Vliet, and Vuksic voting YES and Lambell absent. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES July 28, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\Staff Reports\200825\2 Draft Minutes 7-28-20.docx Page 9 of 9 C. Miscellaneous Items: None VI. COMMENTS The Commission and staff discussed setting a future study session/workship focusing on the expectations for downtown infill developments. VII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Levin moved to adjourn the Architectural Review Commission meeting at 3:10 p.m. ERIC CEJA PRINCIPAL PLANNER SECRETARY JANINE JUDY RECORDING SECRETARY CITY OF PALM DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner Date: August 25, 2020 Subject: SARC 20-0006 – Avenida Monument Sign – 40-445 Portola Avenue Project Summary The project is a request to construct a new monument for the Avenida active senior community located at 40-445 Portola Avenue. The sign will be located at the southwest corner of Via Tuscany and Portola Avenue, near the main entrance of the community. The monument sign is designed in a contemporary style incorporating the same finishes and materials used on the apartment buildings, and features extensive plantings of desert native shrubs around the base. The monument sign will stand at a height of 5’ with a decorative end pillar extending up to a height of 6’. Zoning Ordinance Summary The Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Requires Architecture Review Commission (ARC) approval for all new monument signs under PDMC Section 25.56.030 (D). The ARC’s approval is based on finding listed under 25.56.030 (E). Staff Recommendation Approve the proposed monument sign as presented. Attachment: Sign plans TDPAPAPAPAPAPAPAPAVIA TUSCANYPORTOLA AVENUE PAPAPA+12"+24"+12"+12"+12"+6"4'4'3'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'4'4'3'3'3'3'3'4'4'4'4'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2' 2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'3'3'3'3'3'3'4'4'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'3'3'4'2'2'2'2'2'2'4'3'+12"2'3'3'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'2'4'3'3'3'3'3'3'2'2'2'3'PAPAPAPAPAPAPA+6"+6"+6"+6"+12"+12"+12"+12"+12"+12"+12"+12"+12"+12"+12"PA2'SYMBOL DESCRIPTIONSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONPLANTING AREAALIGNFACE OF BUILDINGCALL OUTEXPANSION JOINTCENTER LINEUTILITY LOCATIONPROPERTY LINETYPICAL CONDITIONSTREET LIGHTPROPOSED STEPS-1FOBPALCEJLPTYPSYMBOL LEGEND0' 1020 30 40DANA POINT CA 9262934197 COAST HWY SUITE 200(949) 443-1446SUMMERS/MURPHY & PARTNERS, INC.E N V I R O N M E N T A L D E S I G NNOTE:NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES OR TREES WITHIN CVWD AND / OR USBR EASEMENTS. CVWDWILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE OR REPLACEMENT OF ANT SURFACEIMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DECORATIVE CONCRETE, LANDSCAPING,CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, PLANTERS, GATES AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLEDWITHIN CVWD AND / OR USBR EASEMENTS.MATCHLINE- REFER TO SHEET CL-2CONSTRUCTIONLAYOUT PLAN CL-5MATCHLINE- REFER TO SHEET CL-7MATCHLINE- REFER TO SHEET CL-4 MATCHLINE- REFER TO SHEET CL-8VIA TUSCANYCL-2CL-3CL-4CL-1CL-5CL-6CL-7CL-9CL-8DESCRIPTION DETAIL/SHEET S-1CONCRETE PAVING 1/CD-9COLOR: NATURAL GRAY W/ BROOM FINISHS-2CURB AND GUTTER -------REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANSS-3EXISTING CONCRETE WALK (PROTECT IN PLACE) -------S-4HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE CROSSWALK / RAMPS-5DRY STREAM BED; 5/CD-9DESERT BROWN COBBLE 2"- 3" (OR EQ)S-6BOULDERS 7/CD-9BAJA CREST 24" DIA MINAVAIL FROM: SOUTHWEST BOULDERS (southwestboulder.com)S-73'-6" HIGH CMU WALL WITH CMU CAP ----ON RETAINING WALL (BY CIVIL)REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS FOR RETAINING CONDITIONS; WALL FINISHES TO BE SELECTEDS-8CORNER SIGN STONE WALLS 1/CD-1 / 1/L-SD2STONE VENEER: EL DORADO CUT COARSE STONE - SEASHELL (STONE & GROUT TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE)TILE AT SIGN WALL: CRAFT CARVED STONE TILE - SANDOLLAR AVAIL AT: CREATIVE MINES (brittney.berkaw@creativemines.us)STEEL PIN LETTERING BY SIGN COMPANYS-942" HIGH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE / GUARDRAIL 5/CD-8 TUBULAR STEEL COLOR: SW 7045 INTELLECTUAL GRAY(MATCH ARCHITECTURE)REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS FOR RETAINING CONDITIONS; WALL FINISHES TO BE SELECTEDREFER TO MANUFACTURER'S SHOP DRAWINGS FOR GUARDRAIL DETAILS AND FINISHES PREPARED BY WHITESTEEL.S-1042" HIGH TUBULAR STEEL FIRE ACCESS GATE 2/CD-8 TUBULAR STEEL COLOR: SW 7045 INTELLECTUAL GRAY(MATCH ARCHITECTURE)REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S SHOP DRAWINGS FOR GATE DETAILS AND FINISHES PREPARED BY WHITESTEEL.S-11MOUNDING (6" CONTOURS) -------REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANSS-12 FOUNTAIN W/ STONE COLUMNS EMITTER 2/CD-7 AND DECORATIVE PEBBLE BASIN 5/L-SD1DECORATIVE PEBBLE BASIN: BLACK (PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER)PLASTER FINISH: NATURALBOULDER SLAB BY RILEY FRITSCH; SOUTHWEST BOULDER rfritsch@southwestboulder.comS-13DECOMPOSED GRANITE WITH STEEL EDGING 6/CD-9 DG: 2" THICK DECOMPOSED GRANITE; "PALM SPRINGS GOLD FINE" , 3/8" MINUS WITH 11% FINES. AVAILABLE FROM: SOUTHWEST BOULDER. (760) 328-5877 (www.southwestboulder.com)S-14MODULAR BENCH WITH BACKING (6) -------MODEL: #RCPMC6 MADISON RECYCLEDPLASTIC CONTOUR BENCH (OR INTERIOR DESIGNERAPPROVED EQ)AVAIL FROM: ANOVA (anovafurnishings.com)S-15STEEL PLANT (REED) SCULPTURES (BY OWNER)S-16 LOUNGE CHAIRS -------TO BE SELECTED BY INTERIOR DESIGNERS-17TRASH CAN 6/CD-10MODEL: LEX 22 / COLOR: TEXTURED PEWTER (OR SIMILAR)AVAIL FROM: ANOVA FURNISHINGS (anovafurnishings.com)OR INTERIOR DESIGNER APPROVED EQS-18 36" HIGH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE 5/CD-8TUBULAR STEEL COLOR: SW 7045 INTELLECTUAL GRAY(MATCH ARCHITECTURE);REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S SHOP DRAWINGS FOR GUARDRAIL DETAILS AND FINISHES PREPARED BY WHITESTEEL.S-19 PET WASTE STATION 4/CD-10MODEL: DOG-I-POTAVAIL: (dogipot.com)S-20 STONE FIRE PIT (57" X 78") 7/CD-10 BOULDER BY RILEY FRITSCH; SOUTHWEST BOULDER rfritsch@southwestboulder.comFIRE GLASS: 12" AZURE FIRE GLASSGLASS GUARD: (2) 72"X6" FLAME GUARDAVAIL FROM: AMERICAN FIREGLASS (americanfireglass.com)PLUMBER TO RUN GAS LINES-21MOON DOOR ART SCULPTURE (BY OWNER) S-8S-14S-1212" HDPE STORM DRAINS-17S-10NOTE:REFER TO SHEET CL-11 FOR DIMENSION PLAN BOULDER DIA SIZE(TYP)LEGEND / FINISH SCHEDULE - CALLOUTS REFER TO THIS SHEET ONLYS-15(TYP) S-22CONCRETE PAVING 1,2 / CD-14COLOR: NATURAL GRAY W/ BROOM FINISHS-23COURTYARD FENCE 3 / CD-14MATCH BUILDING RAIL FENCECOURTYARD GATE (OWNER OPTION) 4 / CD-14MATCH BUILDING RAIL FENCES-24DRAIN BUBBLER BOX 2 / CD-3TO BE COORDINATED WITH ARTIST FOR CORNER CONDITIONS,REFER TO DETAILS / PLANSPREPARED BY KTGYFOR CORNER CONDITIONS,REFER TO DETAILS / PLANSPREPARED BY KTGY 20'-611 00 1 X 2 X 3 5 ~ 5 i �" - ++,, �r �- i,1\ �- \V \� n ,-• � 1. . - Y A, _ - - -- - _ C.O� _ , , L ,\ s E 1 l/ -,\ 21' CORNER SIGN WALL - ELEVATION 4 SCALE: 3/8" = V-0" REFERENCE IMAGE - NTS LEGEND 1. STONE VENEER (WRAP CAP) - REFER TO DETAIL 2, THIS SHEET 7. COBBLE STREAM BED - REFER TO DETAIL 5, CD-9 2. TILE VENEER (WRAP CAP) - REFER TO DETAIL 3, THIS SHEET 8. ADJACENT PAVING - REFER TO FINISH SCHEDULE 3. STEEL PIN LETTERING SIGNAGE BY OWNER 9. FINISH GRADE 4. STEEL LOGO BY OWNER (OPTIONAL) NOTES: 5. ADJACENT PERIMETER WALLS BY CIVIL • REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEER'S DETAILS AND CALCULATIONS FOR ALL ( ) CONNECTIONS, REINFORCING AND FOOTING INFORMATION. 6. DECORATIVE BOULDERS - REFER TO DETAIL 7, CD-9 SEE STRUCTURAL DETAIL 1 / L-SD2 0 1 CORNER SIGN WALL - ELEVATION 16" 1 LEGEND , 1_6,1 1. STONE VENEER - REFER TO FINISH 2 LEGEND SCHEDULE 2 _ 1. STONE VENEER - REFER TO FINISH 2. TILE VENEER - REFER TO FINISH �\ SCHEDULE SCHEDULE D 2. CMU BLOCK, GROUT CELL SOLID 4 3. CMU BLOCK, GROUT CELL SOLID (BATTERED) D ° 8 4. SIGN LETTERING - TO BE PROVIDED _ 3. CONCRETE FOOTING W/ STEEL BY SIGN COMPANY v REBAR C° 3 5. CONCRETE FOOTING W/ STEEL 4. COMPACTED SUBGRADE "' o REBAR 5. GROUT BLOCK ° D 6. COMPACTED SUBGRADE � D 6. FINISH GRADE 3+, o ° ° 7. GROUT BLOCK L 7. SIGN WALL - REFER TO DETAIL X, D 8. FINISH GRADE ?4++ THIS SHEET o 3 8. OPTIONAL LOGO SIGN - REFER TO I D 101, SIGNAGE COMPANY ° - � NOTE: 6 L� ° 9 - REFER TO SOILS ENGINEER'S e, 7 REPORT FOR MINIMUM - NOTE: - REFER TO SOILS ENGINEER'S 30" THICKNESS OF CONCRETE, REINFORCING STEEL SIZE, / \ REPORT FOR MINIMUM THICKNESS OF CONCRETE, REINFORCING STEEL SIZE, - �\Z, / \ \ COMPACTED SUB -BASE MATERIAL. AND REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING COMPACTED SUBGRADE, AND / PLANS FOR ALL RETAINING CONDITIONS SUB -BASE MATERIAL. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING = \\\ \\\ D PLANS FOR ALL RETAINING CONDITIONS D Z,//�\ \� 3 5 SECTION VIEW A SECTION VIEW B SCALE: 1" = V-0" SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 3 CORNER SIGN WALL - SECTION B 12 CORNER SIGN WALL - SECTION A 4P ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN SUMMERS/MURPHY 8, PARTNERS, INC. 34197 COAST HWY SUITE 200 DANA POINT CA 92629 (949) 443-1446 LPN D S Cq p M, Murphy Fqp� �a� ` ' n Signature 7-31-21 * Renewal Date �TFOF CALIT These drawings and/or the accompanying specifications are the exclusive property of Forsum/Summers & Murphy, Inc. and their use and publi- cation shall be restricted to the original site for which they were prepared. Re -use, repro- duction or publication by any method, in whole or part, is prohibited except by written permission from Forsum/ Summers & Murphy, Inc.tA tA SHEET DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DESIGNED SMP DRAWN SMP CHECKED SMP DATE 07-23.2018 JOB NO. 742710 CAD FILE SHEET NUMBER CD-1 OF 57 SHEETS 0 z O °` 0 z 5 N 0 0 O N N W H �o N W � O Z H U � W = � � a N O m M 0 a ~ O o� cC W Z Z W � M O � Q� M W � Z v a U u.i � jZ W � p Oa a C) �G OZ ao�g � M Q Z V WO O W a �O � Qua 3 1 15 1317 19 STRUCTURAL DETAILSL-SD2 P:\Projects\1507 SMP (Avenida Landscape)\1507 SMP - Drawings\1507 SMP L-SD2.dwg Aug 14, 2020 - 5:04pmPatel Burica & Associates, Inc. s t r u c t u r a l e n g i n e e r i n g 9283 Research Drive Irvine, California 92618 Tel: 949.943.8080 Fax: 714.352.2209 AVENIDA - PALM DESERT - LANDSCAPE STRUCTURESAVENIDA PARTNERS, LLCVIA TUSCANY AND PORTOLA AVEPALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA CITY OF PALM DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner Date: August 25, 2020 Subject: MISC 18-0018 – 73-444 Ironwood Street – Fence Exception Project Summary The project is a material and height exception for two (2) existing gates located at 73-444 Ironwood Street. The gates are constructed from tubular steel and finished with stained wood. They are 5’-10” tall and setback approximately 14’-6” from the face of curb. This item previously appeared before the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) on October 23, 2018 as a response to a code compliance case. At that meeting, the ARC believed the design of the gate was attractive and had strong architectural merit, but ultimately continued the case citing compatibility concerns and the height being an issue. The case has remained open in the time since, and is returning with a request for approval. The homeowner has made some changes to the home exterior; painting/repainting, a new roof and adding a new entry door. Zoning Ordinance Summary PDMC Section 25.40.080 Fences and Walls (Fence Code), contains standards for fence placement, fence height, permissible wall and fence materials, and fence design. Per the Fence Code, the maximum permitted height of the wall in its current location is 4’-11”. The current fence exceeds this allowance by a minimum of 1’. The Fence Code does not allow the use of wood material in fences facing street frontage. Exceptions to the standards of the Fence Code may be granted subject to ARC approval. Staff Recommendation Approve the proposed fence, granting the exception as proposed. Attachment: Project Plans & Photos July 30, 2020 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOTICE OF ACTION CASE NO: MISC 18-0018 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: AN OH, 73444 Ironwood Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a material and height exception for two existing wooden 5'-10" gates, setback 14'-6" from the face of curb. LOCATION: 73444 Ironwood Street ZONE: R-1, 20,000 Upon reviewing the plans and presentations submitted by staff, and by the applicant, the Architectural Review Commission continued Case MISC 18-0018 to allow the applicant to be present at a future meeting. Date of Action: July 28, 2020 Vote: Motion carried 7-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be re-submitted to Commission for approval.) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the Architectural Review Commission to the Department of Building and Safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meeting’s agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting.. CITY OF PALM DESERT v s l � d S a Y } *1qL -qwk, ` � If " #N ry � a• r gi % # do- h� ■ ` � f Y ti 1 , Je � ' # * ` Vk Yi r. * + ._ L.W • _ - = f 1 * ' - %6. s_ -, 4 i 1 %6 { -I Pm ■ - . �. -� , r L L R L rlof + ~ L JI ,■ . -46#tL qP 'PI a MINI AL - ■ ' * t _ iF f N 7 14 IF qL R or !` fr if if \ L. � -.I;,r d.. F _ I I Flr J Ir _ + t — 'W,6 - .� . + ;*� t y � •yam � y - - y#� + ��+ 4 �g L �� L 4111 9M6 -vil IP ' i9, 1. m 14 y`` z�} L � 1 { t '� .•9w.w #' . r .4 ■■ s ; ir hill_ L Y r _�JIL - _ t + Afto w a �- f -� t Cot_ I p jr� AW h �':MIL- i i i - s T t I' { r' yr Y k N , ; !�, VL } } 1 499, ' ■� _ ; + i+ - F J ti � # + + � • 1 tij �-i .. , i - ' f - - : L `. — �} ■ 1y _ P ■ •' y • i k ■ aI IL � F - N rt 44 Or reP. f r * rAfjo f ! ! F t # At _ - — j ; — i y f I ■ _ r RPEWIL m 9. w ter•—�� _ tk , N _�,-r $ " . + ;rm i- - " _j -AP "b*- 97 PI PI A J ` #� r + # t � T 1 road- +,' F i J 1 t � IP t ! �ji m f f r Af �JIM jiMl + # + F do , d. .+� - ■t + f f r �F J* Or . 1 R f y 5 F —� 4r ir - Mill J_' _ r - 1 F I4 �, ' f F f IF110 T F Y. + Me •4 I F `if Jot AO 7 If + y + APdw II} IF Z , - - ! P I ,� 1 �r 'A 1 . + y� lb r _ d (�rqI 0 r y. 40 406 - # y 4 F dP I� _ y ; gym K - + ` #++ •• ! — dilm } VP ip 4 40 r � � 1 _ � � � �_ f � # * r+' * � +� �+ 'P # '! 3 Pd I*f' i- T # 1 A- �! ZVI ow- JJ FTwt PP �ii_■- - - r ^ t" Tr r ; i ' _ ; ; ' ' k� 4 —+ F �y * r dw y ev, L IF _ 7 _Pa A - 4j� ■, P - _W qr IMPI rJ �I� 1Yam— t* - �+J+� 4 tgr .t— , * } •-_� T i �` .qN.; ■ *;•yam —� T #+a 4 { i 1a - tom; • IFi ti+ +* + ++rr{* `•CAPOI IL k� - ■ {- _ � *`'•� }�• — � :y� � . � � � � #+ +�� y� � � -ram• �. ~� ■ F �� +P ` L kt # ■ ■� } �`,} ■ ~ - 9. MT:P WL qPL III. 4P A jr - _ � _ - 1 a Apr — + ■ I t rtm +� * � AdF rL dPr+ ti a - 1 ` AF} . T low ■ �tOr } WI t t?!�� T . Y - F r y NL � T • ; r or kv t t k Or • 4 - ,{.. • �# ydo ar kp IL t ■ - * t' L * i + 7• r� `(Y a jp `#%b IF f r -%L -t A - 4 r `P 4 VolqL "k & IL ' IF �M �' ■ MP aw 3L% ti } ` 'Ah �dbr NL *SL4t +rK, pp Ed 4L \ Ak v 06. .% h 51. P-S x a % W. N + 7 �� — p Rpm r '}`' -fir ',1� ; ; f� t ■ r L y ■ • + "Pit M1116 Oil 16 -'AL Nq, -1 +IP A. ■ k f • `.4L IL LAW gq h+ L ' P.1 1 MF '+ 1 990 it. �LsF f' ~ • 16 L w ■ -' J Hai r� r d Z.- ' N or * k fAL Li+ ti� ; ■ *f ~ wy d` # i i + # ■�� ' F. + } • FA Fri �� - + • zx J%L qp h 7%,dL1,L. 4,, _ ;L.�i • i wr r 4 - k + x 51 i w� jF Pv IL lk & mi.f _ ir q Ila owq4 4C y r { 4 4mp w y r* � tea * r k f t .� y - 1 L 1 11 1 I jib ur - � 4w + w _ L •� � +C' y E.04 Ikk P. low _ 1 om ' - { *_ 1p y �i IL r 405 te is :--Zmop— -%L 0 40 if 'pr 4K e� �- NL IMP 41- All + - MP��-w jih foil r r 41 IV j 4;00" r J ami Iq Ile per i i . _AV 41L Of '• OMPEL P. iMi —V IP � �• z F _ te rry J . r; � �/-,* _ 4 IL OWA 9- 4e ir Wh%6 14LALL `ilk di- iff 16 - jr AP — N .1 j A' . 9 `119h, �k . 4 ;:%Jr. , -S IL 91'_ a 4 - ' AL 4iir LOOP* -AI-• -aft-- or * I ,P{ fdPdL - ' f f. + Aot rt � r ' d, .. - �mo ♦ ik� - + { F Jr rr Ar r� r : - or V + 0 t f Apo x or �P�9011 r _ - x F ■ fift dopr IiF + ' T � rN f+ 16 i +� # +■ , ■- } w jp ly k i - ! g, — .O:-.p � r 41F r f _ ;W or jo It - r e '•NP do fir'' � J � +� -''■!' # r # � �r ++�lp ` f 4 i } Lip jL Olt-• op + i r� - 4�T' t! �!' '� i -mr k of rt{^ i ih pill. M -�CJP5� r . — k 1%.m' I , - - — -1W A 41 op , ' - f r IF Lift ~ �wa L fir. +wR-� ' # + _ WE WEE IL IL if i-_ _ i _ 1 } di r �` tip, _ � ■r' �� ++ - F�.� l� off • i r� F 1� a } F qr 1• # � #_ _ # + # Fir ' ;v — - � �� Lip �, f �- ti is �tti *a�■�y� � � { ti In �� — J � _ 91 _ r IFaw - 1, P---, - " ~ r R _ + r - T+ + y EMIL . ' i ti rr _ Milo W woo— ZL y -7&+- { w ry = ` L f j '-ppr 4w + � I. -• ".i -AIL 'F� f 1 } -+�_ 1� +_� _ i<� 4P P .fi � � r _ '# is _ �N.- • � J �� Ji f .;11p ' f � +FPS 10 js it goo F ` ~ 'rt� ; a s AL4 r� jp - + " - F J & . Jr� * 1r - 4 r .100 Rib'"� f y r Or Mt - T 'k try+ +'r + • , OP r ' it Air wVs- k b Ir'` 1d6 i ' w fir. ■ _-�� Lam• - 3 � aq4L_ a h �• i. k i F : t a Aft dil �# } 1 + E # t W. F f RL 4 r ML k q it ° d 4.,1 X A VU ` R 7 A r # '� +rr 5 `h ` #411RL * *.� jtp % t I A 1 / 4py �; * tip■ X10 .' qL I . I A e � 1 •• � 'whip MIL Z. i w i d. ■ *SOL * Ar h k +fi r # • + . � t #- + Ilk � * - a Or ip fPp t q di. ( r ` # # . Y a W. 1. + *vp � ti1.Fr + . + F 1 IL+ i■ # .i .ram *� L + #� h ' A. IF dr '+ ` ,� x � ; • � L # ., ILA . +'I `x �*a � li i� L xOL 14Li t 1 ' . . i _ mm I slip, IL LM IN ■�* I p jo df tit? a A. .4 -11 , ek .1 . - —F I id 466 + s + # * rt ti ■- fs + L56Fad r lop 4L �+ F1* #f� #` *' .* 1dff dip } f I%W,dr D qpr ! Lk: # - # i + ! y r boma*wy.00 hew ,f x + -. im Opikdll ap q 'ir ip A 40 ld 4- � k + * i a te . t4wv �%, f �f r J. 0 ` � r � h #do t qp T, IL ' ' * I , , )j V , I . I 1 .6. 3 ram* 1 * III.f • 1 -e - * ! iik # r �* k + + J ' ' r d jy k ` ` ki F F It 41' i a f Ar r t i q F _ ■ A ■ r� r _ . ' � ; it . t I**a ■ - -� V 0 • ir • STAFF REPORT CITY OF PALM DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEETING DATE: August 25, 2020 PREPARED BY: Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner REQUEST: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of Conditional Use Permit 20-0007 to construct a 65-foot tall monopalm wireless telecommunication facility and ground mounted equipment at 73-750 Dinah Shore Drive Recommendation Continue the case and provide specific design criteria for the proposed facility regarding landscaping and screening of ground-mounted equipment. Background A. Property Description The project site is a 3.18-acre property, located at 73-750 Dinah Shore Drive (Dinah Shore). The property is developed with a 116,750 square-foot personal storage facility operated by Extra Space Storage. The site was approved for development in 2004 with Precise Plan 04-17 and Tentative Parcel Map 32930. Access to the site is available via a single access point on Dinah Shore. A private, gated drive-aisle provides access throughout the site. There is an existing 65-foot wireless telecommunication facility located within a landscape planter at the eastern edge of the property, currently owned by Verizon Wireless. This existing tower was approved in 2008 with CUP 08-247. B. Zoning and General Plan Land Use Designation: Zone: Service Industrial General Plan: Employment C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: City Boundary / Interstate 10 South: Service Industrial (SI) / Vacant site with proposed light industrial East: Service Industrial / Business park West: Service Industrial / Venture Commerce Center August 25, 2020 – Staff Report Case No. CUP 20-0007 – AT&T Page 2 of 4 Project Description The project applicant, AT&T-Smartlink, is requesting approval to construct a 65-foot tall wireless telecommunications tower camouflaged as a palm tree within an existing personal storage complex located at 73-750 Dinah Shore. The tower will feature twelve (12) panel antennas, and thirty-six (36) remote radio units (RRUs) mounted at a height of 56 feet and screened by faux palm fronds, and two (2) circular microwave antennas mounted below the main arrays and fronds. The tower will be located near the north- western corner of the site, in a paved area tucked against the corner/indentation of an existing storage building. Support equipment for the tower includes multiple electrical cabinets, a backup diesel generator, and two (2) HVAC units. The majority of the cabinets and equipment will be located within an existing vacant storage unit. The HVAC equipment will be ground mounted in an area directly adjacent to the tower. The backup generator is located within a drive-aisle where it is separated from the drive area with concrete bollards. Analysis The Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) establishes development and design standards for WTFs under Section 25.34.130. These standards are intended to minimize the visual impact of towers by establishing maximum height, minimum separation distances between towers, stealth design guidelines, and screening requirements for antenna and equipment. The PDMC encourages stealth WTF designs and requires the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) approval to ensure the facility blends in with the existing natural environment per PDMC Section 25.34.130 (O). The facility conforms PDMC requirements as follows: *Separation standards may be waived by the commission by ARC for stealth design per PDMC 25.34.130 (O) (2) The proposed WTF conforms with height and setback requirements, but will require an exception for separation distance from an existing tower located on the same parcel approximately 332’ to the south-east. Before the ARC considers granting an exception for this, staff recommends providing the applicant a list of specific design comments to address and continue the case. STANDARD REQUIREMENT PROJECT CONFORMS Height 65’-0” maximum 65’-0” Yes Separation between towers 1,000’ minimum approx. 332’ No* Separation from residential 300’ minimum 1000’ Yes Front Setback - approx.388’-0” Yes Rear Setback - approx. 85’-0” Yes Interior Side Setback - approx. 66’-0” Yes Street Side Setback - N/A N/A August 25, 2020 – Staff Report Case No. CUP 20-0007 – AT&T Page 3 of 4 Landscaping and Tower Location The applicant has chosen a portion of the site that constrains the potential for live palm plantings required under Section 25.34.130 (F) of the PDMC. The chosen location is limited by the existing buildings, and lack of existing landscape planters. Most of the ground surface area on the site is paved asphalt used for the internal circulation and a fire lane. The existing drive lane is approximately 27’-28’ wide which exceeds the minimum 24’ required for a fire lane, but leaves little opportunity for additional live palms to be planted adjacent to the tree. Without these additional live palms, the project does not meet design requirements established by the code. Additionally, the height of the tower will stand as a visually prominent feature from surrounding properties without additional palms. In comparison, the adjacent buildings stand at an average height of 23’ tall up to a max of 30’. Staff recommends the ARC direct the applicant to provide a solution to this issue by creating new landscape planters that are viable for live vegetation or relocate the tower on the site altogether. Tower Design Based on the photo simulations provided by the applicant, staff is concerned that the antenna arrays on the tower will not be adequately screened by the proposed frond coverage. Additionally, the microwave antenna located directly below the antenna arrays appear prominent. Staff recommends the ARC direct the commission to explore additional means of screening the equipment located on the tower. Support Equipment The majority of the support equipment used for the tower is proposed within a vacant storage unit, providing an ideal screening solution. Ground-mounted HVAC equipment and a Generac backup diesel generator will be located directly adjacent to the base of the tower. The location of this equipment poses issues with screening requirements and minimum fire lane requirements. Section 25.34.130 (F) establishes that the tower and related ground mounted equipment, must be placed behind an 8’ fence or wall for screening and security purposes. The exterior proposed equipment does not conform to this requirement. Additionally, the location of the generators to the west of the base of the tower encroach into the required fire lane and must be relocated. Staff recommends the ARC direct the applicant to devise a design solution to meet the code requirement for screening. Coverage Gap The applicant has provided plots showing a significant gap in cell signal coverage in this vicinity and requiring a new facility. The applicant has also explored alternative locations August 25, 2020 – Staff Report Case No. CUP 20-0007 – AT&T Page 4 of 4 within this coverage gap, however due to lack of property owner agreement and other zoning restrictions, these alternative locations have proven infeasible. Overall, staff recommends the ARC provide specific design comments regarding the tower placement and screening to conform with all PDMC requirements. LEGAL REVIEW DEPT. REVIEW FINANCIAL REVIEW CITY MANAGER N/A Robert W. Hargreaves City Attorney Eric Ceja Eric Ceja Principal Planner N/A Janet Moore Director of Finance N/A Lauri Aylaian City Manager APPLICANT: AT&T - Smartlink 2033 San Elijo Avenue, Suite #600 Cardiff, CA 92007 ATTACHMENT: 1. Exhibits THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS ISPROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T WIRELESSANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TOAT&T WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITEDSHEET NUMBER:SHEET TITLE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:RJSJS3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660TEL: (949) 387-1265FAX: (949) 387-12751452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92780NOT TO BE USEDFOR CONSTRUCTION4430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807T-1THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT THESE DOCUMENTS &AUTHORIZE THE SUBCONTRACTOR TO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBEDHEREIN. ALL DOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDINGDEPARTMENT & MAY IMPOSE CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS.DISCIPLINE:SIGNATURE:DATE:AT&T RF ENGINEER:AT&T OPERATIONS:SITE ACQUISITION:CONSTRUCTION MANAGER:PROPERTY OWNER:ZONING VENDOR:PROJECT MANAGER:SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ONTHE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANYDISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME.THE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. A TECHNICIAN WILL VISITTHE SITE AS REQUIRED FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT INANY SIGNIFICANT DISTURBANCE OR EFFECT ON DRAINAGE; NO SANITARY SEWERSERVICE, POTABLE WATER, OR TRASH DISPOSAL IS REQUIRED AND NO COMMERCIALSIGNAGE IS PROPOSED.Your world. DeliveredDO NOT SCALE DRAWINGSAPPLICANT / LESSEE1452 EDINGER AVE. 3RD FLOORTUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 927801. 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE2. 2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODEADOPTED 2008 NEC3. 2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE4. 2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE5. 2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE6. 2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE7. COUNTY COASTAL ZONE LAND USEORDINANCE-TITLE 238. COUNTY FIRE CODE ORDINANCE - TITLE 169. COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE - TITLE 2210.COUNTY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONORDINANCE - TITLE 19ALL WORKS AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCALGOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMITWORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES.PROPERTY OWNERNAME:DESERT STORAGE 18ADDRESS:PO BOX 320099CITY,STATE,ZIP:ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320LATITUDE:33° 47' 51.99" (33.797775°) NLONGITUDE:116° 22' 36.68" (-116.376856°) WLAT./LONG. TYPE:NAD 83GROUND ELEVATION:193.7' A.G.L.APN #:694-060-026AREA OF CONSTRUCTION:375 SQ FT.ZONING / JURISDICTION:CITY OF PALM DESERTCURRENT ZONING:SI - SERVICE INDUSTRIALPROPOSED USE:UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITYHANDICAP REQUIREMENTS:FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMANHABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS NOT REQUIREDABOVE GROUND LEVEL:65'-0" A.M.S.L.SITE NUMBER: CSL06352 - NSBSITE NAME: EXTRA SPACE STORAGEFA NUMBER: 13014378USID NUMBER: 28596873750 DINAH SHORE DR.PALM DESERT, CA 92211RIVERSIDE COUNTYSI5&·············SI5&CLIENT REPRESENTATIVESITE ACQUISITIONZONINGENGINEERCOMPANY: CASA INDUSTRIES, INC.ADDRESS: 4430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DCITY,STATE,ZIP: ANAHEIM, CA 92807CONTACT: JULIUS SANTIAGOPHONE: (714) 553-8899EMAIL:JSANTIAGO@CASAIND.COMRF ENGINEERATT PROJECT MANAGERAPPLICANTRF ENGINEERCOMPANY:AT&TADDRESS:1452 EDINGER AVE.CITY,STATE,ZIP:TUSTIN, CA. 92780CONTACT:SANDEEP MANGATPHONE:(805) 312-1694EMAIL:sm2840@aTT.COMCONSTRUCTION MANAGERCOMPANY:SMARTLINK, LLCADDRESS:3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300CITY,STATE,ZIP:NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660CONTACT:ALEXIS DUNLAPPHONE:(949) 838-7313EMAIL:alexis.dunlap@smartlinkllc.comCOMPANY:BECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.ADDRESS:16808 ARMSTRONG AVENUE SUITE 225CITY,STATE,ZIP:IRVINE, CA 92606CONTACT:RON VANDERWALPHONE: (714) 343-0931EMAIL: rvanderw@bechtel.comCOMPANY:SMARTLINK, LLCADDRESS:3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300CITY,STATE,ZIP:NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660CONTACT:ALEXIS DUNLAPPHONE:(949) 838-7313EMAIL:alexis.dunlap@smartlinkllc.comCOMPANY:SMARTLINK, LLCADDRESS:3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300CITY,STATE,ZIP:NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660CONTACT:ALEXIS DUNLAPPHONE:(949) 838-7313EMAIL:alexis.dunlap@smartlinkllc.comCOMPANY:AT&TADDRESS:3073 ADAMSCITY,STATE,ZIP:RIVERSIDE, CA 92504CONTACT:BOB STURTEVANTPHONE:(714) 473-7268EMAIL:rs1458@att.comCOMPANY:AT&TADDRESS:3073 ADAMSCITY,STATE,ZIP:RIVERSIDE, CA 92504CONTACT:BOB STURTEVANTPHONE:(714) 473-7268EMAIL:rs1458@att.comLEASE AREA:375 SQ FT.PROJECT TEAMCODE COMPLIANCEVICINITY MAPGENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTESAPPROVALSLEGAL DESCRIPTIONGENERAL NOTESLOCAL MAPSITE INFORMATIONDRAWING INDEXYour world. DeliveredDRIVING DIRECTIONSPROJECT DESCRIPTIONINDOOR EQUIPMENT q tiSyO VICINITY MAP N.T.S. PROJECT AREA �_ �F Off, > i \"o Q � ® � W U O OfQ Lj � W Li N z N 35TH AVE SURVEY DATE 03/29/2020 BASIS OF BEARING BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON U.S. STATE PLANE NAD83 COORDINATE SYSTEM CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE ZONE SIX, DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS. BENCHMARK PROJECT ELEVATIONS ESTABLISHED FROM GPS DERIVED ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS BY APPLICATION OF NGS 'GEOID 1213' MODELED SEPARATIONS TO ELLIPSOID HEIGHTS DETERMINED BY OBSERVATIONS OF THE 'SMARTNET' REAL TIME NETWORK. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD88. GRID -TO -GROUND SCALE FACTOR NOTE ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA ZONE SIX STATE PLANE COORDINATE ZONE GRID. TO DERIVE GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE BY 0.99998067 FLOOD ZONE THIS PROJECT APPEARS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "X". ACCORDING TO FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP(S), MAP ID #06065C1595G, DATED 08/28/2008 JI JIIMIVMIE011 SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THEIR LOCATIONS ARE DEFINITE. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DEVELOPER TO CONTACT 811 AND ANY OTHER INVOLVED AGENCIES TO LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REMOVAL, RELOCATION AND/ OR REPLACEMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. NOTES CORRESPONDING TO RECORDS MATTERS SEE SHEET LS-2 SURVEYOR'S NOTES THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS PLOTTED FROM RECORD INFORMATION AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID DISTANCES. CONTOURS DERIVED FROM DIRECT FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND FOLLOW THE CURRENT NATIONAL MAP STANDARDS FOR VERTICAL ACCURACY. SURVEYOR HAS NOT PERFORMED A SEARCH OF PUBLIC RECORDS TO DETERMINE ANY DEFECT IN TITLE ISSUED. LEGEND AP ASPHALT Oxxxx UTILITY MANHOLES BLDG TOP OF BUILDING oxxxx UTILITY METER CONC CONCRETE D/W ACCESS DRIVEWAY tiYo FIRE HYDRANT FC FACE OF CURB OS UTILITY POLE LP LIGHT POLE � LIGHT POLE R/W RIGHT OF WAY SW SIDEWALK POSITION OF GEODETIC COORDINATES SPOT ELEVATION DQ WATER CONTROL VALVE CURBLINES CMU WALLS EXISTING BUILDINGS PARKING STRIPES — — — STREET CENTERLINES — — — — RIGHT OF WAY LINES — — — — SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE — — — — ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - EASEMENT LINES — — — — LEASE AREA LIMITS — MAJOR CONTOUR INTERVAL - MINOR CONTOUR INTERVAL PARCEL APN: 694-061-029 20' SEWER EASEMENT PROPOSED ATT NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCESS ROUTE DUMPSTER � ELECTRIC/ ELEC COMMUNICATION TRANSF.O EASEMENT `WATER METER, WATER" WATER VERIZON PULLBO \ / ASPHALT EDGE 197.20 AP (N35'25'56"E 50.00' �AP AP N54°33' 1 6"W 48.08' 0 SEE DETAIL, SHEET LS-2 o POSITION OF I .GEODETIC COORDINATES-7 25' ACCESS EASEMENT 20' LANDSCAPE & PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT P.O.C. COPPERWELD MONUMENT L=355.04' R=1500.00'�*"' 0=013°33'41 " P"4 351 kA 0 POSITION OF GEODETIC COORDINATES LATITUDE 33° 47' 51.99" (33.797775°) NORTH (NAD83) LONGITUDE 116° 22' 36.68" (116.376856°) WEST(NAD83) GROUND ELEVATION @ 193.7' (NAVD88) PARCEL APN: 694-060-028 O PARCEL APN: 694-080-015 LV DG OLIVI L .100e / BLDG LDG GATE BL\G � o PARCEL I O APN: 694-080-014 12.5' RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT FOR PARCEL 3 20' SEWER EASEMENT GRAPHIC SCALE 40 80 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. 1452 EDINGER AVENUE 3RD FLOOR TUSTIN, CA 92780 ambit consulting 410 E. SOUTHERN AVE. TEMPE, AZ 85282 PH. (480) 659-4072 4430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE D ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807 B 05/05/20 DESIGN/LEGALS (RAG) PRELIMINARY (RR) LV04/04/20 DATE DESCRIPTION 'ATRICK B. DONOHOE No. 993332 DATE OF SIGNATURE: 05/07/2020 IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT. CSL06352 73750 DINAH SNORE DRIVE PALM DESERT, CA, 92211 SHEET TITLE SITE SURVEY SHEET NUMBER LS 1 COPPERWELD MONUMENT PARENT PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEASE AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 32930, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 214 PAGES 20-21 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL 2: AN EASEMENT (NOT TO BE EXCLUSIVE) AS AN APPURTENANCE TO PARCEL ONE ABOVE FOR ACCESS, LANDSCAPE, PEDESTRIAN AND DRAINAGE OVER THAT AREA DESIGNATED AS "12.5 ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 AND FOR EMERGENCY PUBLIC SERVICE AND INGRESS AND EGRESS" AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 214 PAGES 20-21 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL 3: AN EASEMENT (NOT TO BE EXCLUSIVE) AS AN APPURTENANCE TO PARCEL ONE ABOVE FOR EMERGENCY INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR PERSONS AND VEHICLES OF ALL TYPE OVER THAT AREA DESIGNATED AS "12.5 ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 AND FOR EMERGENCY PUBLIC SERVICE INGRESS AND EGRESS" ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 32930, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 214 PAGES 20-21 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND AS GRANTED BY THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0959670 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN: 694-060-026 SCHEDULE "B" NOTE REFERENCE IS MADE TO STATUS OF RECORD TITLE REPORT ORDER No. 92012077-920—CMM—CM8, GUARANTEE NO.: CA—SFXFC—IMP-81G28-1-20-92012077, ISSUED BY COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, DATED FEBRUARY 28, 2020. ALL EASEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN SAID TITLE REPORT AFFECTING THE IMMEDIATE AREA SURROUNDING THE LEASE HAVE BEEN PLOTTED. NOTES: — SCHEDULE B ITEMS 3, 7, 8, 11 AND 12 ARE NOT SURVEY MATTERS AND HAVE NOT BEEN PLOTTED ITEMIZED NOTES: 1. WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT DISCLOSED BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. (BLANKET IN NATURE) 2. EASEMENT(S) FOR THE PURPOSE(S) SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO, AS DELINEATED ON OR AS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION ON MAP/PLAT: PARCEL MAP NO. 24255 RECORDING NO: BOOK 206, PAGE 94-99, OF MAPS PURPOSE: LANDSCAPE AND PEDESTRIAN AFFECTS: AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP (AS SHOWN ON SURVEY) 4. EASEMENT(S) FOR THE PURPOSE(S) SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO, AS DELINEATED ON OR AS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION ON MAP/PLAT: PARCEL MAP NO. 32930 RECORDING NO: BOOK 214, PAGE 20-21, OF MAPS, PURPOSE: RECIPROCAL ACCESS & DRAINAGE AFFECTS: AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP (AS SHOWN ON SURVEY) 5. THE OWNERSHIP OF SAID LAND DOES NOT INCLUDE RIGHTS OF ACCESS TO OR FROM THE STREET, HIGHWAY, OR FREEWAY ABUTTING SAID LAND, SUCH RIGHTS HAVING BEEN RELINQUISHED BY SAID MAP/PLAT. AFFECTS: DINAH SHORE DRIVE EXCEPT FOR AN ACCESS OPENING (AS SHOWN ON SURVEY) 6. MATTERS CONTAINED IN THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED: EASEMENT AGREEMENT DATED: NOVEMBER 18, 2005 EXECUTED BY: DESERT STORAGE 18 (CA) LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND DESERT GATEWAY SELF STORAGE, LP, , A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RECORDING DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2005 RECORDING NO: 2005-959670, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO SAID DOCUMENT FOR FULL PARTICULARS. (AS SHOWN ON SURVEY) 9. EASEMENT(S) FOR THE PURPOSE(S) SHOWN BELOW AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO, AS GRANTED IN A DOCUMENT: GRANTED TO: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, A CORPORATION PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS RECORDING DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 2011 RECORDING NO: 2011-84275, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AFFECTS: A PORTION OF SAID LAND (AS SHOWN ON SURVEY) 10. AN EASEMENT DEED BY COURT ORDER IN SETTLEMENT OF LANDOWNER ACTION AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL THERETO AS SET FORTH IN A DOCUMENT RECORDED RECORDING DATE: AUGUST 29, 2013 RECORDING NO.: 2013-423943, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (EXACT LOCATION INDETERMINATE — NOT SHOWN) A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 32930, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 214 PAGES 20-21 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A COPPERWELD MONUMENT AT THE APPARENT INTERSECTION OF SPYDER CIRCLE AND DINAH SHORE DRIVE, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED IN BOOK 131, PAGE 42, FILED JULY 16, 2009, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND STATE, FROM WHICH A COPPERWELD MONUMENT AT THE APPARENT INTERSECTION OF 35TH AVENUE AND DINAH SHORE DRIVE BEARS ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEAST ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°33'41 ", A DISTANCE OF 355.04 FEET; THENCE FROM POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF DINAH SHORE DRIVE, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1500.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25°12'28", A DISTANCE OF 659.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54°33'16" WEST, 48.08 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 35°25'56" EAST, 50.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEAST RIGHT—OF—WAY OF SAID DINAH SHORE DRIVE; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 35°25'56" EAST, 370.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 35°32'32" EAST, 17.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 80°32'33" EAST, 11.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54°27'27" EAST, 8.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35°32'32" WEST, 24.89 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54°27'27" WEST, 15.89 FEET RETURNING TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 365 SQUARE FEET (0.008 ACRES) OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. �19 4.1 /AP 193.E / AF, i i i i i i i i i i i i/I 94.3 AP� RAI BLDG i BLDG �_193.9 AP A 0 P\ i S �19 - P.O.B. LEASE AREA PROPOSED ATT NON—EXCLUSIVE ACCESS ROUTE 193.E CONC 193.8J AP 193.5J AP POSITION OF GEODETIC COORDINATES 9.A .,No 33 11 P 193.2 AP '2S54°277"E 008.' 93.81PA\\ \\ \\ \ \ A S35°32'32"W 24.89' PROPOSED LEASE AREA BUILDING GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 5 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. 40 CIO 041 c 7193.0 AP 193.6 AP 1452 EDINGER AVENUE 3RD FLOOR TUSTIN, CA 92780 ambit consulting 410 E. SOUTHERN AVE. TEMPE, AZ 85282 PH. (480) 659-4072 4430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE D ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807 B 05/05/20 DESIGN/LEGALS (RAG) A 04/04/20 PRELIMINARY (RR) REV DATE DESCRIPTION a 'ATRICK B. DONOHOE N o.01 99332 DATE OF SIGNATURE: 05/07/2020 IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT. CSL06352 73730 DINAH SHORE DRIVE PALM DESERT, CA, 92211 SHEET TITLE SITE SURVEY' SHEET NUMBER LS-2 a 'ATRICK B. DONOHOE N o.01 99332 DATE OF SIGNATURE: 05/07/2020 IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR, TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT. CSL06352 73730 DINAH SHORE DRIVE PALM DESERT, CA, 92211 SHEET TITLE SITE SURVEY' SHEET NUMBER LS-2 T T T T T T T T T T T ET&ET&ET&ET&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T&E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T&ETHE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS ISPROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T WIRELESSANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TOAT&T WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITEDSHEET NUMBER:SHEET TITLE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:RJSJS3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660TEL: (949) 387-1265FAX: (949) 387-12751452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92780NOT TO BE USEDFOR CONSTRUCTION4430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807A-11SITE PLAN15'30'1"=30'-0"SCALE:SECTOR 'A'10°SECTOR 'B'100°SECTOR 'C'190°SECTOR 'D'280°DINAH SHORE DRIVE T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T& E T&ET&ET&ET&ET&ETHE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS ISPROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T WIRELESSANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TOAT&T WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITEDSHEET NUMBER:SHEET TITLE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:RJSJS3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660TEL: (949) 387-1265FAX: (949) 387-12751452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92780NOT TO BE USEDFOR CONSTRUCTION4430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807A-24ANTENNA AND RRU SCHEDULE3ANTENNA PLAN3/8"=1'-0"SCALE:·2LEASE AREA PLAN3/8"=1'-0"SCALE:1ENLARGED SITE PLANSECTOR 'A'10°SECTOR 'B'100°SECTOR 'C'190°SECTOR 'D'280°1/8"=1'-0"SCALE: BC BC THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS ISPROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T WIRELESSANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TOAT&T WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITEDSHEET NUMBER:SHEET TITLE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:RJSJS3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660TEL: (949) 387-1265FAX: (949) 387-12751452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92780NOT TO BE USEDFOR CONSTRUCTION4430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807A-31NORTHEAST ELEVATION 2NORTHWEST ELEVATION 1/4"=1'-0"SCALE:1/4"=1'-0"SCALE:·· AT&T CSL06352 EXTRA SPACE STORAGE 73750 DINAH SHORE, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 - 1 F r�s�_,i NIi4PUSEU.[iEl+IERATOR MUNI CN D AUS T :Rl A PROPOSED AT&T PANEL ANTENNAS ON MONOPALM PROPOSED MW ANTENNAS PROPOSED MONOPALM h r ACCURACY OF P140TO SIMULATION BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PROJECT APPLICANT. THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION IS AN ARTISTIC REPRESENTATION AND IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE AN EXACT REPRODUCTION. AT&T CS L06352 EXTRA SPACE STORAGE 73750 DINAH SHORE, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 QAUSSRI immNowl AIL INSTALLATION IS AN ARTISTIC REPRESENTATION AND IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE AN EXACT REPRODUCTION. 4Z�W�- � �:%mw"o �WR 4 AT&T Ap I .. LOCATION CS L06 52 EXTRA SPACE STORAGE 73750 DINAH SHORE, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 CNA & A INSTALLATION IS AN ARTISTIC REPRESENTATION AND IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE AN EXACT REPRODUCTION. MATERIALS BOARD Palm Light Density Medium Density Medium Heavy Density On Behalf of Chris Doheny Wireless Development Specialist 3300 Irvine Ave, Ste 300 Newport Beach, CA 92660 619.994.8528 – cell AT&T Project Number: CSL06352 AT&T Project Name: Extra Space Storage City of Palm Desert Project Information and Justification AT&T Mobility (AT&T) is requesting approval for the construction and operation of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility (cell site), and presents the following project information for your consideration in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code section 25.34.130: Project Location Address: 73750 Dinah Shore Dr., Palm Desert, CA 92211 APN: 694-060-026 Zoning: SI-Service Industrial Project Description AT&T proposes to construct an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility consisting of a 65 Ft. tall faux “monopalm.” tree. The antennas will be disguised within the branches of the palm tree which will blend nicely with the many other trees in the near vicinity. The associated equipment cabinets will be inside Extra Space storage unit and adjacent unobtrusive lease space for generator and AC units.. AT&T will work with the City and the community to install a state-of-the-art stealth faux tree which will provide a benefit to the residents and visitors of the City of Palm Desert. AT&T is submitting an application for consideration of a top height of the proposed Monopalm to be 65 Ft. Top of proposed antennas is 60 Ft., with 5 feet of additional palm coverage. Monopalm Design The new 65 FT. Monopalm design is proposed to be in compliance with wireless code 25.34.130 Communication Towers and Antenna regulations; to minimize adverse visual impacts, to include foliage socks colored to blend with palm fronds. The new Monopalm will include 80 Fronds total. Monopalm fronds to extend from 18 inches minimum up to 46 inches beyond the antennas. Monopalm Faux tree bark, textured and colored to match live palm tree. Project Objectives There are several reasons why a wireless carrier requires the installation of a cell site within a specified area to close a “significant gap in coverage:” • The radio signal must be of sufficient strength to achieve consistent, sustainable, and reliable service to customers at a level sufficient for outdoor, in-vehicle, and in-building penetration with good voice quality (Threshold, -76db). • When nearby other sites become overloaded, and more enhanced voice and data services are used (4G and other high-speed data services) signal contracts and a gap is created. With heavy use it is intensified due to the unique properties of digital radio transmissions. In this specific case, this location was selected because AT&T’s radio-frequency engineers (RF) have identified a significant gap in coverage in the vicinity of Monterey Ave. and Interstate 10, in the City of Palm Desert and the surrounding community as demonstrated on the submitted radio-signal propagation maps. Findings/Burden of Proof The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape. AT&T is proposing a mono-palm design for this project which is a stealth design. The requested height of the mono-palm design is the minimum height needed in order to fill the significant gap in coverage for this project. The height restriction for the wireless facilities is 65’. AT&T uses the most advanced technology and design when constructing the mono-palm so as to blend the facility with the surrounding community and landscaping and thereby minimizing the visual impact of the site. The proposed location has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and quality of traffic generated by the proposed use. The access to this site is immediately off Dinah Shore Dr. There are adequate access routes directly to the proposed facility. All the roadways and access ways within the facility are in compliance with local, state and federal regulations concerning width and pavement. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties. The project will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties as it is a stealth design that will blend naturally with the subject property and is far away from any residential areas outside the ring. The project will provide a public benefit of better wireless telecommunications and data services to the surrounding neighborhoods and community. The proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience or welfare. The new wireless telecommunications facility is in high demand to the residents and visitors of the County of Riverside. Wireless communications are vastly used in this area and the need for this site was established entirely from increased usage of AT&T services in the vicinity of the requested project. GENERAL INFORMATION Location In compliance with wireless code 25.34.130, communications towers may be approved within the zone district of Service Industrial (SI). AT&T proposed facility is located within a Service Industrial zone included in the guidelines as preferred. Site Selection Customer demand drives the need for new cell sites. Data relating to incomplete and dropped calls is gathered, drive-tests are conducted, and scientific modeling using sophisticated software is evaluated. Once the area requiring a new site is identified, a target ring on a map is provided to a real estate professional to begin a search for a suitable location. During an initial reconnaissance, properties for consideration for the installation of a cell site must be located in the general vicinity of the ring, with an appropriate zoning designation, and appear to have enough space to accommodate an antenna structure and the supporting radio equipment. The size of this space will vary depending on the objective of the site. The owners of each prospective location are notified to assess their interest in partnering with AT&T. Four key elements are considered in the selection process: • Leasing: The property must have an owner who is willing to enter into a long-term lease agreement under very specific terms and conditions. • Zoning: It must be suitably zoned in accordance with local land-use codes to allow for a successful permitting process. • Construction: Construction constraints and costs must be reasonable from a business perspective, and the proposed project must be capable of being constructed in accordance with local building codes and safety standards. • RF: It must be strategically located to be able to achieve the RF engineer’s objective to close the significant gap with antennas at a height to clear nearby obstructions. Alternative Site Analysis Other sites considered and approached by Smartlink leasing specialist include the list below and the reasons they were either rejected or unavailable for this project’s facilities. This was a very difficult search in respect to the size of our search ring, size of industrial and commercial lots in the area, and meeting set back requirements. Other, larger lots in the area were contacted, we could not locate a landlord with firm interest to have an agreement. We expanded our search ring to locate possible prospects without luck. This search ring was “Exhausted” with AT&T and in the end, we established contact with Extra Space storage who expressed interest in working with AT&T. 73771 Dinah Shore Dr., Palm Desert, CA – Platinum Property Partners - – Lack of landlord interest. 73725 Dinah Shore Dr., Palm Desert, CA – Owner – Timothy Ellenz – very limited space and no landlord interest 73600 Dinah Shore Dr., Palm Desert, CA – Marysville Drive In Theatre Co. – Lack of landlord interest. 73750 & 60 Spyder Circle, Palm Desert, CA – MRG Properties - limited space Expanded Search Ring Both rejected by AT&T RF 34295 Monterey Ave., Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 – Pacific Sales Kitchen & Home 34900 Monterey Ave., Palm Desert, CA 92211 – Pet Smart I have included an overview of our search ring and property lots below to demonstrate the limited space we are working with. We were also limited to the outer edges of the search ring to the west and south due to residential zoning. It is not unusual within a small, dense primarily commercial search ring, that we only get a few responses to work with. Space is limited within the search ring individual properties that would enable this type of project and meet the codes for development, setbacks and separation. AT&T made every effort to meet all setbacks, separation and height guidelines according to 24.34.130 Communications Tower and Antenna Regulations. We changed our antennas array from 4 antennas per sector to 3 antennas, 3 antennas per sector to improve the design and stealth screening of the facility. The existing American Tower 65 Ft. Monopalm would not provide for colocation due to height limitations and design. Monopalm design is the preferred design to match existing landscape characteristics. Proposing a co-locatable faux pine tree or eucalyptus tree would not be consistent with environment. Monopalm facilities do not provide for colocation in regard to height requirement and RF requirements to service all technologies. The Benefits to the Community Approximately 90-percent of American adults subscribe to cell phone service. People of all ages rely increasingly on their cell phones to talk, text, send media, and search the Internet for both personal and business reasons. More and more, they are doing these things in their homes, therefore, becoming reliant on adequate service within residential neighborhoods. In fact, 50-percent of people relocating are not signing up for landline service at their new location and are using their cell phone as their primary communication method. The installation and operation of the proposed facility will offer improved: • Communications for local, state, and federal emergency services providers, such as police, fire, paramedics, and other first-responders. • Personal safety and security for community members in an emergency, or when there is an urgent need to reach family members or friends. Safety is the primary reason parents provide cell phones to their children. Currently 25% of all preteens, ages 9 to 12, and 75% of all teens, aged 13 to 19, have cell phones. • Capability of local businesses to better serve their customers. • Opportunity for a city or county to attract businesses to their community for greater economic development. • Enhanced 911 Services (E911) – The FCC mandates that all cell sites have location capability. Effective site geometry within the overall network is needed to achieve accurate location information for mobile users through triangulation with active cell sites. (Over half of all 911 calls are made using mobile phones.) Safety – RF is Radio The FCC regulates RF emissions to ensure public safety. Standards have been set based on peer-reviewed scientific studies and recommendations from a variety of oversight organizations, including the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Federal Drug Administration (FDA), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Although the purview of the public safety of RF emissions by the FCC was established by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, these standards remain under constant scrutiny. All AT&T cell sites operate well below these standards, and the typical urban cell site operates hundreds or even thousands of times below the FCC’s limits for safe exposure. AT&T Company Information AT&T is one of the fastest growing nationwide service providers offering all digital voice, messaging and high-speed data services to nearly 30 million customers in the United States. AT&T is a “telephone corporation”, licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to operate in the 1950.2-1964.8, 1965.2-1969.8 MHz and 1870.2-1884.8-1889.8 MHz frequencies, and a state- regulated Public Utility subject to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The CPUC has established that the term “telephone corporation” can be extended to wireless carriers, even though they transmit signals without the use of telephone lines. AT&T will operate this facility in full compliance with the regulations and licensing requirements of the FCC, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the CPUC, as governed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and other applicable laws. The enclosed information is presented for your consideration. AT&T requests approval of the proposed location and design. Please contact me at 619-994-8528 or chris.doheny@smarlinkgroup.com for any questions or requests for additional information. Respectfully submitted, Chris Doheny Chris Doheny, Smartlink, LLC Authorized Agent for AT&T Project Representative Chris Doheny Smartlink, LLC 18401 Von Karman Ave, Ste 400 Irvine, CA 92612 619-994-8528 cellular chris.doheny@smartlinkgroup.com AT&T Contact Gunjan Malik, Project Manager 1452 Edinger Ave. 3rd Floor Tustin, CA 92780-6246 Gm827w@att.com 562-650-5681 AT&T Search Ring – Area assigned to search for willing landlord. LTE Justification Plots Market Name:Los Angeles Site Name: EXTRA SPACE STORAGE Site ID: CSL06352 Site Address: 73750 DINAH SHORE DR. PALM DESERT, CA 92211 ATOLL Plots Completion Date: Apr 27, 2020 Page 2 © 2008 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T is a registered trademark of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. Propagation of the site plots are based on our current Atoll (Design tool) project tool that shows the preferred design of the AT&T 4G-LTE network coverage. The propagation referenced in this package is based on proposed LTE coverage of AT&T users in the surrounding buildings, in vehicles and at street level . For your reference, the scale shown ranges from good to poor coverage with gradual changes in coverage showing best coverage to marginal and finally poor signal levels. The plots shown are based on the following criteria: Existing: Since LTE network modifications are not yet On-Air. The first slide is a snap shot of the area showing the existing site without LTE coverage in the AT&T network. The Planned LTE Coverage with the Referenced Site: Assuming all the planned neighboring sites of the target site are approved by the jurisdiction and the referenced site is also approved and On-Air, the propagation is displayed with the planned legends provided. Without Target site: Assuming all the planned neighboring sites are approved by the jurisdiction and On-Air and the referenced site is Off-Air, the propagation is displayed with the legends provided. Assumptions Page 3 © 2008 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T is a registered trademark of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. LTE Coverage Before site CSL06352 CSL06352 Page 4 © 2008 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T is a registered trademark of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. LTE Coverage After site CSL06352 CSL06352 Page 5 © 2008 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T is a registered trademark of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. LTE Coverage standalone site CSL06352 CSL06352 Coverage Legend In-Building Service:In general, the areas shown in dark green should have the strongest signal strength and be sufficient for most in-building coverage. However, in-building coverage can and will be adversely affected by the thickness/construction type of walls, or your location in the building (i.e., in the basement, in the middle of the building with multiple walls, etc.) In-Transit Service: The areas shown in the yellow should be sufficient for on- street or in-the-open coverage, most in-vehicle coverage and possibly some in-building coverage. Outdoor Service:The areas shown in the purple should have sufficient signal strength for on-street or in-the-open coverage, but may not have it for in- vehicle coverage or in-building coverage. CITY OF PALM DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner Date: August 25, 2020 Subject: PP 19-0006 – Single-Story Duplex 73-271 San Nicholas Way Project Summary The project is a Precise Plan application to construct a 3,452-square-foot single-story residential duplex on a vacant lot at 73-271 San Nicholas Way. The architecture is characterized by a complex roof structure at a maximum height of 19’-11” and exterior materials consisting of stucco siding and asphalt roof shingles. The front yard features landscaping and two (2) side-entry carport structures setback 16’ from the curb face; the reduced setback for the carport structure will require a setback reduction granted by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) based on design merit. This item previously appeared at the May 26, 2020 meeting. The ARC raised design comments on the roof form, as well as compatibility of the contemporary style carport with the traditional character of the main home. The applicant has re-designed the roof by removing the large central gable that ran the length of the roof line. The new design features a complex roof shape consisting of multiple adjoining roof shapes. Minor changes to the front façade include an addition of a new window trim and relocation of the main entry to each unit. The plans now show HVAC equipment. Zoning Ordinance Summary This project is required to receive design review approval by the ARC prior to proceeding to Planning Commission in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.68.020. Required findings for the ARC are contained in PDMC Section 25.68.040. Staff Recommendation Provide direction to the applicant for the design of the roof, street facing façade, carport structures and front yard landscaping. Attachment: Elevations May 28, 2020 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOTICE OF ACTION CASE NO: PP 19-0006 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: KOLA OLATUNBOSUN, 73-360 Catalina Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a design for a new single-story residential duplex. LOCATION: 73-721 San Nicholas Way ZONE: R-2 Upon reviewing the plans and presentations submitted by staff, and by the applicant, the Architectural Review Commission continued Case No. PP 19-0006 subject to: 1) revise design of the roof; 2) consider revising the design of the primary façade; 3) consider incorporating the covered parking into the main structure; and 4) show the location and details of all utilities and mechanical equipment on plans. Date of Action: May 26, 2020 Vote: Motion carried 5-0-1-1, with Commissioner Levin abstaining and Commissioner McAuliffe absent (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be re-submitted to Commission for approval.) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the Architectural Review Commission to the Department of Building and Safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meeting’s agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. C ITY OF PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 25, 2020 B. Preliminary Plans Commissioner Levin recused himself from the following item and remained in the Zoom virtual meeting. 1. CASE NO: PP 19-0006 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: KOLA OLATUNBOSUN, 73-360 Catalina Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a design for a new single-story residential duplex. LOCATION: 73-721 San Nicholas Way ZONE: R-2 Mr. Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner, reminded the Commission a request to construct a 3,452-square-foot single-story residential duplex on a vacant lot at 73-271 San Nicholas Way came before the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) on October 22, 2019. At that meeting, the ARC raised design comments on the roof form, compatibility of the contemporary style carport with the traditional character of the main home, code issues with the floor plan and general articulation. The applicant has re-designed the roof by adding additional gables stacked upon the primary roof form, which has added to the total height of the structure. The contemporary flat roofed carports have been replaced with shed roof carports, which mimic the pitches used on the main home. The bedrooms, which did not meet building code egress requirements, have been removed from the floor plan. This falls within most of the development standards with the exception of the carport which would be applying for a 16’ side-entry carport exemption allowed by the code. He said given the resubmittal, his recommendation would be to continue this to provide some clear direction to the applicant with what the ARC would like to see in terms of the roof form and moving this towards a more traditional roof style, as well as direction on the floor plan, street facing façade, carport structures and front yard landscaping. Chair Van Vliet said he spent a lot of time trying to figure out what was going on here and didn’t understand the drawings as they were very complex, very difficult to understand and confusing. He had an issue with the height and liked the earlier elevations better. He also had problems figuring out what was going on with the whole roof system and feels the drawings needed more work. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 25, 2020 MR. JERRY JONES, designer, explained that they originally had a gabled roof but the Commission suggested adding more architectural features on the roof instead of having a straight gable. They went back and added little shingles (sic) on the side elevation and broke up the roof to give it some character with different overlays on the roof. The carport had a flat roof and they revised that to a shed roof to conform to the main roof. MR. KOLA OLATUNBOSUN, applicant, said the bedrooms were removed due to the egress issues which then created extra space for the living room. MR. JONES said the way they revised the roof was expensive and would prefer the straight gable as previously submitted. Commissioner McIntosh said the challenge here is putting this duplex into an existing neighborhood and what he’s seeing is something that looks very complex and expensive and not really in context with the neighborhood. He told the applicants they could probably find a solution between the straight gable and this complex design. He said even the carport structures look rather commercial in nature. For this to fit in with the neighborhood, instead of standing out, he suggested a roof design that wasn’t so drastic but not just having a straight gable. MR. JONES explained that they could delete the taller gable that overlays the lower gable in the front of the north elevation and go back to a complete gable on that end. Commissioner McIntosh and the applicants continued to discuss the design changes. Commissioner McIntosh stated that the way it is designed now it feels very foreign to the neighborhood and is very complicated. Commissioner McIntosh and the applicants reviewed and discussed the shade structures. Commissioner McIntosh suggested integrating the shade structures into the architecture instead of having prefabricated type shade structures as they look very commercial. He suggested they step back and consider making it all part of the same design. Commissioner McIntosh asked where the air conditioning mechanicals were located. MR. JONES indicated they were in the rear corners of the lot. Commissioner McIntosh suggested they include that on the re-design as it will help drive their design. Commissioner Vuksic said a lot of times in a superior building, the roof has something to do with what is happening below, but this design doesn’t reflect what is happening below. He said this kind of looks like a church because they have this extremely powerful symmetry that is not needed. He said the first design solution was too simple and this one is too complicated and they need to find something in between. MR. JONES said they will probably get rid of the higher gable to start with and integrate the carport into the design of the main structure. Commissioner Vuksic was a little concerned that they were creating a list of list of things from this ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 25, 2020 meeting and said this really needs to be looked at with a keen design eye so that it’s an attractive composition of forms. ACTION: Commissioner Vuksic moved to continue Case No. PP 19-0006 subject to: 1) revise design of the roof; 2) consider revising the design of the primary façade; 3) consider incorporating the covered parking into the main structure; and 4) show the location and details of all utilities and mechanical equipment on plans. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Lambell and carried by a 5-0-1-1 vote, with Lambell, McIntosh, Schmid, Van Vliet, and Vuksic voting YES, Levin abstaining and McAuliffe absent. C. Miscellaneous Items: None VI. COMMENTS Discussion on Palms to Pines III and reopening City Hall. VII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Levin moved to adjourn the Architectural Review Commission meeting at 2:40 p.m. ERIC CEJA PRINCIPAL PLANNER SECRETARY JANINE JUDY RECORDING SECRETARY DEFINITIONSGROSS FLOOR AREA IS CALCULATED IN RELATIONSHIP TO THESTRUCTURE AND GRADE ADJACENT TO THE EXTERIOR WALLSOF A BUILDING. THE ELEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS GROSSFLOORAREA CALCULATION ARE LISTED IN THE SECTION 113.0234(b) OFTHE PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE.GROSS FLOOR AREA ATTIC SPACE INCLUDES THE ATTIC SPACEABOVE THE CEILINGS WHERE THERE IS 5'-6"VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE CEILING AND THE ELEVATION OF THE ROOMIMMEDIATELY ABOVE ACCORDING TO REGULATIONS FOR PHANTOM FLOORS IN SECTION113.0234(B)(4)(A) OF THE PALMDESERT MUNICIPAL VODE.SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECT73-271 SAN NICHOLAS WAYPALM DESERT, CA 92260APN # :627051002-1LOT #: 179 MBOWNER :OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73360 CATALINA WAY, APALM DESERT,CA 92260BUILDER:OLAT GENERAL BUILDINGCONSTRUCTION, LLC. No.85214173360 CATALINA WAY, APALM DESERT, CA 92260CORP. No. 8740425000CONTRACTOR:ARCHITECT:KOLA OLATUNBOSUN73360 CATALINA WAY, APALM DESERT, CA 92260LICENSE No. 852141CIVIL ENGINEER:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSTRUCTURALENGINEER:TITLE 24X X X X XX X X X XX X X X XBUILDING DEPARTMENT DATAPLANINGDEPARTMENT :CITY OF PALM DESERTTEL: (760) 776-6483BUILDINGDEPARTMENT:CITY OF PALM DESERT BUILDING AND SAFETYTEL:(760) 776-6420OCCUPANCY:R-2TYPE OFCONSTRUCTION:NUMBER OFSTORIES:1FRED WARING DRTOWNCENTER WAYHWY111MONTEREYAVEHWY74WESTFIELDPALM DESERTEL PASEODE S E R T CR O S S IN G S HWY 111 SAN PABLOAVESanAnselmoSanta RosaWySanNicholas WCatalina WayNVICINITY MAPPROJECTSITEPALMDESERTVISION CENTERCITY OF PALM DESERT FIRE SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION1.PURPOSETo clarify the requirements in the California Fire Code,Article 87 for fire safetyand fire protection during construction and to assist when choosing a specificbrand or style of engineered fire access surface material systems as analternative to ashphalt or concrete which meets the approval of Palm DesertFire Department, Fire Department Bureau, Riverisde County Fire Department.II. SCOPEAll buildings and sites undergoing construction, alteration or demolition shallcomply with the provisions of this policy prior to combustible construction orstorage of combustible products. Olat General Construction Co, INC. shall beresponsible for compliance with the provisions of this policy.III. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS1. With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced project, fire department recommends the following fireprotection measures be provided in accordance with City Municipal Code, NFPA, CFC, and CBC or any recognized Fire Protection Standards:The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel/construction of all buildings per UFC Article 87.2. A flow of 1500 gpm for 1-hour at 20 psi residual pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.3. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of providing a gpm flow of 1500 gpm for single family dwellings.4. The required fire flow shall be available from a wet barrel Super Hydrant 4"x21/2"x21/2", located not less than 25' nor more than 200' from any portion of a single family dwelling measured via vehicular travelway.5. Water Plans must be approved by the Fire Marshall and include verification that the water system will produce the required fire flow.6. Install a complete NFPA13 fire sprinkler system. This applies to all buildings with a 3000 square foot total cummulative floor area.The Fire Marshall shall approve the locations of all post indicator valves and fire department connections. All valves and connections shall not be less than 25' from the building and 50' of an approved hydrant. Exempted are one/two family dwellings.7. All valves controlling the water supply for automatic sprinkler systems and Water-flow switches shall be monitored and alarmed per CBC Chapter 9.8. Install a fire alarm system as required by the CBC Chapter 3.9. Install portable fire extinguishers per NFPA 10, but not less than one 2A10BC extinguisher per 3000 square feet and not over 75' walking distance. A "K" type fire extinguisher is required in all commercial kitchens.10. Install a duct collecting system per CFC Chapter 76 if conducting an operation that produces air-borne particles.11. All buildings shall have illuminated addresses of a size approved by thecity.12. All sprinkler systems, fixed fire suppression systems and alarm plans must be submitted separately to the Fire Marshall for approval prior toconstruction.FRED WARING DRFRED WARING DRHWY111EL PASEOEL PASEOCIVIC CENTER PARKCIVIC CENTERXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTITLE SHEETJERRY JONES OFJONES & M00RE CONSTRUCTIONP. O. BOX 1653RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270LICENSE No. 570549PHONE No. (760) 898-1007PHONE No. (760) 218-2066PROJECT DATAHWY744SHEET LISTGENERALARCHITECTURALA-101A102A-103A-104A-105A-106A-107A-108A-109A-110 A: 3D-ORTHGRAPHIC PROJECTION [1]A-000TITLE SHEETA-100SITE PLAN A: 3D-ORTHGRAPHIC PROJECTION [2] A: 3D-ORTHGRAPHIC PROJECTION [3]B: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, E-W B: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, N-SD: ROOF PLANE: CROSS SECTIONS CUTSE: CROSS SECTION DRAWINGS (E-W)E: CROSS SECTION DRAWINGS (N-S)C: FLOOR PLANA-111F: LANDSCAPE PLANScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: MAY 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLCSAN NICHOLAS PROJECTA-000OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLCTITLE SHEETOwnerOLAT GEN. BLG.CO LLCWhen customer is ready for the waterto be turned back on, they must call andsign up the account to turn on the water.the number is xxxxxxxxxxxxxxCPVC PEX NOTE:State Health and Safety Code Sec. 17921.9 bans the useof Chorinated Polyvinyl Chloride (CPVC) and crosslinkedPolyethyleen (PEX) for interior heater supply piping.GROSS & NET ACREAGE OF PARCEL: 0.1953ACGROSS & NET FLOOR AREA: 3452 SQ. FTPROPOSED No. OF PARKING SPACES: 4LOT COVERAGE, % LAND COVERED: 41%LANDSCAPE % IN: 20.7%WATER METER NOTE:Note: The Builder, OlatGeneral Building Construction,INC, has contracted with itselffor the services of providingthe minimum architectruraldrawings required, whencombined with the builersother consultnat drawings toobtain a building permit for theproject. These drawings arenot intended to, nor do theydetail all conditions, identidyall materials or define or limitthe scope of work requied tocomplete the project. OlatGeneral Construction Co, Inc.has requests, accepts andrepresents that it will select allmaterials and manufacturersqualified, and and will selectall subcontractors andinstallers, direct allconstruction procedures wellabove these drawings tocomplete the project incompliance withallgovernment agencies, andwork to meet or exceed allindusties' standardsNo. Description DatePRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: MAY 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLCSAN NICHOLAS PROJECTA-001OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLCTABLE OFCONTENTSOwnerOLAT GEN. BLG.CO LLCTABLE OF CONTENTS1S I T E P L A N2A-3D- ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION [1]3A-3D- ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION [2]A-3D-ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION [3]45B:ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, HORIZONTAL6B: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, VERTICAL7C: FLOOR PLAN DRAWING89 E: CROSS SECTIONS CUTS10E: CROSS SECTION DRAWINGS HORIZONTAL11E: CROSS SECTION DRAWINGS VERTICAL12LANDSCAPE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .AA-111A-110A-109A-108A-107A-106A-105A-104A-103A-102A-101A-100PAGED: ROOF PLAN DRAWINGNo. Description DatePRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT A:3/TE PL AM lul ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 3/8" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-101OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC3D ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION3D RENDERING: 73721 SANNICHOLAS WAY PROJECTOTHER 3DOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject NamePRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-101BOLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECT3D RENDERINGOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject Name3D ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-103OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECT3D RENDERINGOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject Name3D ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: MAY 1, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-103BOLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC3D RENDERINGOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject Name3D ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT NOTE: EACH PITCH OF THE CARPORT IS THE SAME AS THE MAIN STRUCTURE. B: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION, EAST -WEST KEY COLOR CODES PAINT COLOR A: MUSHROOM BISQUE, TYPICAL FOR BODY COLOR PAINT COLOR B: ALMOND WISP FOR FACIAL BOARD & TRIMS FAST ELEVATION KEY COLOR CODES PAINT COLOR A: MUSHROOM BISQUE. TYPICAL FOR BODY COLOR FAINT COLOR B. ALMOND WISP FOR FACIAL BOARD & TRIMS NOTE: EACH ROOF PITCH OF THE CARPORT 19 EXACTLY THE SAME AS MAIN STRUCTURE Owner:QLAT GEN. BLG.CO. LLC OLAT GENERAL SII ILOING GO. LLC Project Name SAN NICFNXM WILDING PROJECT EAST- WEST 7BaF4ATXWLAS WAY PROJECT Data ; AUGUST M 2= Dram By: KOLA Checkad By : JERRY JONES Scala: 3W - 1' O" A-104A e�l B: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS: NORTH -SOUTH KEY COLOR CODES PAINT COLOR A: MUSTRAD BISQUE, TYPICAL FOR BODY COLOR PAINT COLOR B: ALMOND WISP FOR FACIAL BPAORDS AND TRIMS - PAINT COLOR C: ANCESTRAL PAINT COLOR FOR FRONT DOORD rcum�ewrmnaw+.swun---- _� � ,� �rrunAacwniooxorsraurs 8 ICI A 0 0 A a0 - C C NORTH ELEVATION KEY COLOR CODES Qwner:0LAT GEN. BLG.CC. LLC OLAT GENERAL BIIILOING Co. LLC PAINT COLOR A: MUSTARD BISQUE, TYPICAL FOR BODY COLOR PAINT COLOR B: ALMOND WISP FOR FACIAL BOARDS AND TRIMS SOUTH ELEVATION Project Name SAN NICHOLAS BIALDINO PROJECT -kbFA'9T& .AS WAY PROJECT Prglr Mumher:1 Date : AUGUST 20.2020 Drawn By: KOLA Checked By : JERKY JOKES soale : 3v = T O• A-105A PAINT COLOR A: MUSHROOM BISQUE, TYPICAL FOR BODY COLORPAINT COLOR B: ALMOND WISP FOR FACIAL BOARD & TRIMSKEY COLOR CODESBBBAABAAB3A1134A113APAINT COLOR A: MUSHROOM BISQUE, TYPICAL FOR BODY COLORPAINT COLOR B: ALMOND WISP FOR FACIAL BOARD & TRIMSKEY COLOR CODES3A1134A113BABAABBAEAST ELEVATIONScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-104AOLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECTOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject NameB: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION, EAST-WESTWEST ELEVATIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: MAY 1, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-103BOLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLCJUST 3DOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject Name3D ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT Floor0' - 0"Ceiling 19' - 0"Chimney HeightLevel15' - 2"Roof Level18' - 6"Roof Ridge Level 119' - 11"Carpot Level7' - 6"Ceiling 210' - 0"New Roof level16' - 6"Up Pole11' - 6"Level 128' - 7"PAINT COLOR A: MUSHROOM BISQUE, TYPICAL FOR BODY COLORPAINT COLOR B: ALMOND WISP FOR FACIAL BOARD & TRIMSKEY COLOR CODESBBBAABAAB3A1134A113AFloor0' - 0"Ceiling 19' - 0"Chimney HeightLevel15' - 2"Roof Level18' - 6"Roof Ridge Level 119' - 11"Carpot Level7' - 6"Ceiling 210' - 0"New Roof level16' - 6"Up Pole11' - 6"Level 128' - 7"PAINT COLOR A: MUSHROOM BISQUE, TYPICAL FOR BODY COLORPAINT COLOR B: ALMOND WISP FOR FACIAL BOARD & TRIMSKEY COLOR CODES3A1134A113BABAABBAEAST ELEVATIONScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-103OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECTOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject NameB: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION, EAST-WESTWEST ELEVATIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT Floor0' - 0"Ceiling 19' - 0"Chimney HeightLevel15' - 2"Roof Level18' - 6"Roof Ridge Level 119' - 11"Carpot Level7' - 6"Ceiling 210' - 0"New Roof level16' - 6"Up Pole11' - 6"Level 128' - 7"Floor0' - 0"Ceiling 19' - 0"Chimney HeightLevel15' - 2"Roof Level18' - 6"Roof Ridge Level 119' - 11"Carpot Level7' - 6"Ceiling 210' - 0"New Roof level16' - 6"Up Pole11' - 6"Level 128' - 7"1A1132A113ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-105BOLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECTOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject NameB: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS: NORTH - SOUTHPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT 1A1132A113ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-105COLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECTOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject NameB: ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS: NORTH - SOUTHPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT A1042 2020 LIVINGROOM KITCHEN90 SF. DININGAREA BEDROOM CLOSET LOBBY BEDROOM LIVING ROOM DINING CLOSET 28 BATHROOM OVERHEAD CABINETS BATHROOM 32" POCKET DOOR 8" BAR OVERHANG C L O S E T 20 20 6 FOOT SLIDING GLASS DOOR BATHROOM 20 LIVINGROOMDININGAREA BEDROOM CLOSET LOBBY BEDROOM LIVING ROOM DINING CLOSET BATHROOM OVERHEAD CABINETS BATHROOM 8" BAROVERHANG 6 FOOT SLIDING GLASS DOOR CABINETS/WSINK ONLY WALK-IN CLOSET 32" POCKET DOOR KITCHEN CABINETS/WSINK ONLY WALK-IN CLOSET 69' - 8"3' - 3"4' - 7"6' - 6"5' - 6"6' - 4"7' - 0"6' - 2"7' - 7"4' - 5"6' - 5"6' - 0"3' - 3"2' - 8"5' - 2" 12' - 2"12' - 2" 65' - 0"69' - 8"C L O S E T 2' - 4"2' - 4"7' - 10"6' - 6"11' - 10"15' - 10"15' - 9"11' - 11"5' - 0"2' - 9"6' - 6"5' - 8"5' - 0"15' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 8"6' - 6"7' - 10"6' - 6"11' - 10"15' - 10"15' - 9"11' - 11"4' - 0"5' - 0"3' - 4"3' - 4"4' - 0"2' - 3"2' - 3"2' - 9" 2' - 4"2' - 4" 13' - 7"12' - 2"13' - 7" 9' - 0"24' - 4"9' - 0" 12' - 1"7' - 10"15' - 0"7' - 10"12' - 1" 1' - 3"1' - 3"11' - 9"12' - 2"3' - 2"3' - 6"12' - 1"5' - 2"2' - 2"4' - 3"2' - 2"5' - 7"6' - 1"14' - 4"6' - 2"0' - 2"5' - 5"5' - 7"6' - 1"14' - 4"6' - 2"0' - 2"5' - 5"11' - 9"3' - 2"3' - 6"12' - 1"5' - 2"2' - 2"4' - 3"2' - 2"3' - 4"22' - 3"3' - 4"13' - 0" 10' - 3"4' - 9"12' - 4"12' - 4"10' - 3" BATHROOM 12' - 1" N 7' - 9" 2' - 0" 4' - 9" 2' - 0"2' - 8"3' - 3"6' - 0"6' - 5"4' - 5"7' - 7"6' - 2"7' - 0"6' - 4"5' - 6"6' - 6"4' - 7"3' - 3"5' - 0"54' - 10"5' - 2" 6' - 3" 3' - 0"1' - 9"3' - 0"6' - 0"3' - 0"4' - 3"6' - 5"6' - 5"4' - 3"3' - 0"6' - 0"3' - 0"1' - 9"3' - 0" 7' - 9" 4' - 9"4' - 9" 54' - 10"5' - 0" 6' - 3" 27' - 5"27' - 5"5' - 2"5' - 2" 5' - 2" 5' - 0"5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 2" 5' - 2" 5' - 2"3' - 0"6' - 0"3' - 0"4' - 7"6' - 1"6' - 1"4' - 7"3' - 0"6' - 0"3' - 0"ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 1/4" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-106OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECTFLOOR PLAN Print2Owner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject NameC: FLOORPLANPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT F 0 m a la I rT{ D I I ' I m p I I I I I - I L D. ROOF PLAN ------------------------------------------- 4"gutter with downspout I Owner:OLAT GEN. BLG.CO.LLC OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO.1 I Project Name I SAN NICHOLAS BUILDING PROJECT I ROOFPLAN 73,721 SAN WCHOLAS WAY PROJECT 4" gutter with downspout PrcjmtNumber: I J Date : AUGUST 20, 2020 Drawn By: KOLA Checked By : JERRY JONES Scale: 3W' = TO' A-107 24 ' overhang 15" overhang15" overhangvents . 15" overhang vent HIP carport GABLEGABLE HIP 15" overhang15" overhangvents. 15" overhang vent GABLE GABLEGABLE carport vents . VENTSVENTS 24" overhang 24" overhang ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 3/8" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-107OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECTROOF PLANOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject NameD: ROOF PLANPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT 24" overhang15" overhang15" overhang15" overhang 15" overhangHIP GABLE GABLE GABLE GABLE carport carport 15" overhang 15" overhang HIP vents.vents. vents vents VENTS. 24" overhang ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 3/8" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-107OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECTROOFPLANOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject NameD: ROOF PLANPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT A1051 A104 A105 A1042 2 1 SAN NICHOLAS WAY N TO AND FRO FRED WARING DR CATALINA WAY DEAD ENDSAN PABLO WAY36 FT.. 36 FT.. SAN ANSELMO WAY.EXISTING BUILDING SPACE (NTS)..PL PL PLPLPLPL1A113 2 A113 3 A113 4 A113 1 2. 3. 4.ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 3/8" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-108OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECTSECTIONS' CUTSOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject NameE: CROSS SECTIONS' CUTSPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT Floor0' - 0"Ceiling 19' - 0"Chimney HeightLevel15' - 2"Roof Level18' - 6"Roof Ridge Level 119' - 11"Carpot Level7' - 6"Ceiling 210' - 0"New Roof level16' - 6"Up Pole11' - 6"Level 128' - 7"3A1134A113Floor0' - 0"Ceiling 19' - 0"Chimney HeightLevel15' - 2"Roof Level18' - 6"Roof Ridge Level 119' - 11"Carpot Level7' - 6"Ceiling 210' - 0"New Roof level16' - 6"Up Pole11' - 6"Level 128' - 7"3A1134A113Floor0' - 0"Ceiling 19' - 0"Chimney HeightLevel15' - 2"Roof Level18' - 6"Roof Ridge Level 119' - 11"Carpot Level7' - 6"Ceiling 210' - 0"New Roof level16' - 6"Up Pole11' - 6"Level 128' - 7"1A1132A113Floor0' - 0"Ceiling 19' - 0"Chimney HeightLevel15' - 2"Roof Level18' - 6"Roof Ridge Level 119' - 11"Carpot Level7' - 6"Ceiling 210' - 0"New Roof level16' - 6"Up Pole11' - 6"Level 128' - 7"1A1132A113ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject Number: JULY 20, 2020: KOLA: JERRY JONES: 3/8" = 1' O": 1SAN NICHOLAS BUILDINGPROJECTA-109 - 110OLAT GENERAL BUILDING CO. LLC73-721 SAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECTSECTIONS'DRAWINGSOwner:OLAT GEN.BLG.CO.LLCProject NameSECTION1SECTION2SECTION3SECTION4E: CROSS SECTIONS' DRAWINGSPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT N Curb Line . RED CRUSHED AG ROCK C O N C R E T E C E M E N T 12-FT, EXISTINGMULBERRY TREE EXISTING 7'FICUS TREE 3/8" GOLD AG CRUSHED ROCK6' FICUS TREE . 20' PARKING SPACE . .RED CRUSHED ROCK . 14' BLUE AGORI CACTUS Curb Line SAN NICHOLAS WAY 20' PARKING SPACE . 12" COTTAGE STONES 3/16" ORO VERDE ROCK 6' FICUS TREE 12" COTTAGE STONES 24 ' BOXWOOD SHRUBS PROPERTY LINE 42" SCREENWALL . . 24 ' BOXWOOD SHRUBS AG CRUSHED ROCK AG CRUSHED ROCK3/8" GOLD AG CRUSHED ROCK6' FICUS TREE ..6' FICUS TREE..BERMUDA GRASS 14' BLUE AGORI CACTUS 3/16" ORO VERDE ROCK 3/8" GOLD AG CRUSHED ROCK .3/8" GOLD AG CRUSHED ROCK.3/8" GOLD AG CRUSHED ROCK.CONCRETE CEMENT ScaleDateDrawn ByfF : LANDSCAPE PLANSPLANTING PLANPLANT SPECIFICATIONS1. SPECIES : BLUE AGAVE CATUS (Agavoideae) Size Container : 14" Diameter, 1 Gallon Quantity : 8 Availability : Locally Abundant Square Footage : 1.36 Sq. Ft.2. SPECIES : 3' FICUS SHRUBS (Ficus Benjamina) Size Container : 12" Diamter, 1 Gallon Quantity : 35 Square Footage : 1 Sq. Ft3. SPECIES : FICUS TREE : ( Ficus Benjamina) Sice Container: 5 Gallons Quantity : 2 Availability: Locally Available Square Footage : 2.25 Sq. Ft4. 24" BOXWOOD SHRUBS: Quantity:36 Availability: Square Footage: 1 Sq. Ft5. 10'-CRETE MYRTLE TREES Quanity: 2 Availability: Locally Available Square Footage: 2.5 Sq.FtIRRIGATION PLAN :All plants are native desert species.Watering is only required to establish plants. after being established in 4 to12 weeks, natural rainfall will sustain the native plants, therefore, no irrigation is needed. The plants will be watered every two weeks until they are established.Approximately 1 Gallon of water per plantis needed.Estimated monthly landscape water usageis calcualted as follows:42 plants X 1 gallon/plant = 42 Gallonswatering 2 times per month = 84 times per monthThree months per year = 3 X 84=252 GallonsTherefater, no more water will be required forirrigation.SCOPE OF WORKA GREAT PORTION OF THE FRONT YARD AND THE CITY EASEMENT AREA WILL BE COVEREDWITH 3" LAYER OF RED SOIL WITH THE EXCEPTIONOF DRIVEWAY WHICH WILLLBE COVERED WITHCONCRETE CEMENT AND AG CRUSHED ROCK. THEPBACK AREA AND THE FRONT PARKING AREA WILLALSO BE COVERED WITH CONCRETE CEMENT.PROJECT DATATOTAL LOT AREA = 8125 SQ. FTUNDISTURBED AREA = 0 SQ. FTDISTURBED AREA = 8125SQ. FTTOTAL BUILDING AREA = 3872 SQ. FTLANDSCAPE AREA = 1600 SQ. FTLANDSCAPE AREA WITH CITY EASEMENT = 1000SQ.FTRED WARING DRIVEFRED WARING DRIVEFRED WARING DRIVESANTA ROSA WAYSAN NICHOLAS WAYCATALINA WAYSAN PABLO WAYSAN ANSELMO WAY73-271HWY 111HWY 111HWY 111EL PASEO WAYEL PASEO WAYEL PASEO WAY VICINITY MAPOLAT GENERAL BUILDINGCO. LLCLANDSCAPE PLAN: MAY 2020: KOLAJERRY: 1/4" = 1' O"Checked BySAN NICHOLAS WAY PROJECTA-111Enter addresshereLANDSCAPEPLANPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCTPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT PRODUCT