Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-05-26 ARC Regular Meeting Agenda Packet CITY OF PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION POSTED AGENDA MAY 26, 2020 (VIRTUAL MEETING) 12:30 P.M. City of Palm Desert, California I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 12, 2020 IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Note: In consideration of the current Coronavirus/COVID-19 Pandemic and pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Orders, Commissioners may participate via teleconference/Virtual Meeting. Any person wishing to discuss any item not otherwise on the agenda has the following options for public participation: Public comment may be received by email or voicemail from the time the agenda is posted up until one (1) hour prior to the posted time of meeting convening (12:30 p.m.). Emails received will be printed and distributed for the record prior to the meeting. If the sender so request they will be read into the record at the meeting not to exceed (3) minutes in length. Email: planning@cityofpalmdesert.org Voicemails will be forwarded to the Architectural Review Commissioners at or near the time they are received. If the sender so requests, they may also be saved and played at the appropriate point in the live meeting not to exceed three (3) minutes in length. Voicemail: 760-776-6409 Because the Brown Act does not allow the Architectural Review Commission to take action on items not on the Agenda, members may briefly respond or instead refer the matter to staff for report and recommendation at a future Architectural Review Commission meeting.. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA May 26, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Agendas\2020\200526ag.doc Page 2 of 3 V. CASES: A. Final Drawings 1. CASE NO: MISC 20-0011 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: SEAN AND KIM SMITH, 47-817 Sun Corral Trail, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a new side-entry carport 16’ from curb. LOCATION: 47-817 Sun Corral Trail ZONE: R-1, 10,000 2. CASE NO: MISC 20-0012 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: GREGORY AND JENNIFER SPATES, 73-695 O’Keefe Way, Palm Desert, CA 92211 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a height exception to construct a 17’-0” single family residence. LOCATION: 77-730 Mountain View ZONE: RE 3. CASE NO: MISC 19-0030 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: WOOD INVESTMENTS COMPANIES, 2950 Airway Avenue, Unit A-9, Costa Mesa CA 92626 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Façade update to existing Palms to Pines Shopping Center. LOCATION: 72-655 Highway 111 ZONE: P.C.-(3) SP ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AGENDA May 26, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Agendas\2020\200526ag.doc Page 3 of 3 B. Preliminary Plans 1. CASE NO: PP 19-0006 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: KOLA OLATUNBOSUN, 73-360 Catalina Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a design for a new single-story residential duplex. LOCATION: 73-721 San Nicholas Way ZONE: R-2 C. Miscellaneous Items None VI. COMMENTS VII. ADJOURNMENT Reports and documents relating to each of the following items listed on the agenda are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection during normal business hours, Monday – Friday, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260, 760/346-0611. ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* Please contact the Department of Community Development, 760/346-0611, for ADA assistance the Monday prior to the meeting. ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* Declaration of Posting I, Janine Judy, Management Specialist I for the Department of Community Development of the City of Palm Desert, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION meeting of Tuesday, May 26, 2020 was posted on the bulletin board by the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, on Friday, May 22, 2020. Date: May 22, 2020 Janine Judy Recording Secretary CITY OF PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 12, 2020 (VIRTUAL MEETING) I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 12:30 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Commissioners Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Chris Van Vliet, Chair X 5 1 Karel Lambell, Vice Chair X 5 1 Allan Levin X 6 Michael McAuliffe X 6 Jim McIntosh X 5 1 Jim Schmid X 5 1 John Vuksic X 5 1 Also Present Ryan Stendell, Director Community Development Eric Ceja, Principal Planner Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner Russell Grance, Director Building and Safety Monica O’Reilly, Mgt. Specialist II Lorena Ritchey, Mgt. Specialist II Wayne Olson, Economic Development Janine Judy, Recording Secretary Cancelled meetings: 12/24/19,3/10/20, 3/24/20, 4/14/20 III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 2 of 16 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 28, 2020 Action: Commissioner Levin moved to approve the April 28, 2020 meeting minutes with minor changes. Motion was seconded by Chair Van Vliet and carried by a 6-0- 1 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Schmid and Van Vliet, voting YES and Vuksic absent. V. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: PP/CUP 16-188 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: MONTEREY CROSSING, Attn: Gabriel Rios, 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA 92660 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve final construction drawings for Buildings 5 and 6 of the Monterey Crossing Specific Plan. LOCATION: Dinah Shore Drive/Monterey Avenue ZONE: P.C.-3 Mr. Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner, presented a request for approval of final construction drawings for two (2) multi-tenant retail buildings within Monterey Crossings Center; Buildings 5 and 6. The architecture for these two (2) buildings received preliminary approval from the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) in December 2016. Building 5 is located along the south-western boundary of the site and will be occupied by restaurant tenants. Building 6 is located directly east of Building 5 and will contain retail. The plans largely match the preliminary elevations approved by the ARC. One notable change occurs to the north-east tower on Building 5; the proportions have been changed in order to accommodate several site utilities and a path-of-travel from the parking area. The elevations still substantially match the preliminary approval. The architecture is subject to the requirements of the Monterey Crossing Specific Plan (MCSP). The preliminary architecture was approved based on compliance with the MCSP. Staff recommends approval of the final drawings as presented. Commissioner McAuliffe referred to the minor revision on the canopy elevation on Building 6 and said this area was revised with the openings and overall the elevation is fine. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 3 of 16 ACTION: Commissioner McAuliffe moved to approve subject to submitting minor revisions to canopy elevation. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Levin and carried by a 6-0-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Schmid and Van Vliet voting YES and Vuksic absent. Commissioner McIntosh recused himself from this project and remained in the meeting. 2. CASE NO: MISC 20-0012 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: GREGORY AND JENNIFER SPATES, 73-695 O’Keefe Way, Palm Desert, CA 92211 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a height exception to construct a 17’-0” single family residence. LOCATION:. 77-730 Mountain View ZONE: RE Mr. Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner, presented a request for a height exception to construct a 4,837-square-foot single-family residence and 477-square-foot detached casita at a maximum height of 17’-0” from finished grade; 2’ above what is allowed in the RE zone. He presented site elevations, a color board and roof plan for review. The property is a vacant one-acre lot zoned Estate Residential (RE) located at the northwest corner of Mountain View and Latisha Lane (Latisha). The architecture of the proposed structure is traditional and characterized by stucco siding, sloped tile roof, and stone veneer wainscoting. The home’s primary entrance will front upon Mountain View and feature a three (3)-bay garage fronting upon Latisha. The structure conforms with setbacks and development standards for the RE zone. Per section 25.10 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC), the maximum height for a structure in the RE zone is 15’. The Architectural Review Commission may grant exceptions for homes to have a maximum height of 18’ based on design merit. Staff recommends approval of the proposed home and granting the exception as proposed. MR. GABRIEL RIOS, designer, said the area that is going over the 15’ height is only 2’ and it is mainly the living room area and the center of the kitchen. Commissioner Lambell stated that the Commission looks for architectural significance to grant approval for a height exception. She asked the designer what he thought was significant on this house that sets it apart from other homes in the neighborhood. MR. RIOS said ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 4 of 16 the owner was going with a standard design that is compatible with the neighborhood. On the front face of the south elevation they recessed everything and added the stone element to give it more of an architectural feature than just a standard home. This element gives it more of an offset and has a nice custom feel to it. Commissioner Lambell asked the designer to consider a pop of color to balance out the neutral color palette. MR. JIM MCINTOSH, resident, referred to the 6’ high block wall along Latisha and asked if that was allowed by code because he thought it was 5’ high if on the property line. Mr. Melloni said the allowed height depends on the setback relative to the face of the curb. For a 6’ high wall, it has to be 20’ back with pilasters every 30’, as well as additional landscaping. He suggested the applicant revise the site plan to show wall placement that complies with wall ordinance. MR. MCINTOSH agrees with the previous statement that there isn’t any architectural significance especially since the height goes from side to side all the way across the building on a long ridge with no breakup of the architecture. He also feels this does not stand out in the neighborhood. Commissioner Levin asked if there was anything going on within the house that necessitated the additional height. MR. RIOS said the living room currently is 10’ but they did dropped the ridgeline as low as they could and used a 3:12 pitch. Commissioner Lambell said rather than having one long element she asked if this could change at the master bathroom closet, keeping the height in the great room and kitchen to break up that long expanse. MR. RIOS said he will look at an area right past the living room and possibly switching that end to a hip to break it up. He said he will review the roofline and make revisions. Commissioner Schmid was concerned with the blank east facing wall of the kitchen and asked the designer to work with the articulation on that wall. He said there is a lot of detail on the front of the house and was concerned that with the increase in height they are just pulling that big blank wall a lot higher. Commissioner McAuliffe was concerned with the garage doors because they will also be highly visible on this corner lot. He thinks if they were to double frame that face of the wall that will help to further elevate the quality of the home. Chair Van Vliet referred to the color board and questioned the main color, as well as the trim color. He and the designer discussed where ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 5 of 16 the trim color will be located. Commissioner Lambell was concerned with the starkness of the pure white stucco and how it relates to the stone and bronzes. Chair Van Vliet suggested color combinations on the different masses that may improve the starkness of the white stucco. ACTION: Commissioner Lambell moved to continue Case No MISC 20-0012 subject to: 1) consider adding additional color to exterior palette; 2) re-examine design of roof line above 15’ to break up the long horizontal mass of the gable form; 3) articulate exterior expanse of eastern kitchen wall; 4) recess garage doors in a manner similar to recessed windows; and 5) revise site plan to show wall placement that complies with wall ordinance. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Levin and carried by a 5-0-1-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, Schmid and Van Vliet voting YES, McIntosh abstaining and Vuksic absent. 3. CASE NO: MISC 20-0005 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: 72221 HIGHWAY 111, LLC, Attn: Adam Gilbert, 2496 E. Santa Ynez, Palm Springs, CA 92264 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve façade remodel for an existing multi-tenant retail building within the Las Sombras Center: Bump and Grind Plaza. LOCATION: 72-221 Highway 111 ZONE: P.C.-4 Mr. Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner, presented a request to modify the façade of a 17,000-square-foot multi-tenant retail building along Highway 111. The proposal also includes landscaping modifications which will remove all existing turf along the property’s Highway 111 frontage and replace it with desert native plant species. The building is a part of the Las Sombras Center, which was originally developed in the early 1980s. The respective buildings within the center are currently under separate ownership, but utilize the common parking area. The existing architecture is characterized by Spanish inspired sloped terra- cotta roofs, tan stucco, and a long-horizontal form with multiple breaks in the building mass. He presented site elevations, a color board and roof plan and said changes to the building include: new contemporary parapets and tower forms along the western and eastern elevations; addition of outdoor dining terraces; addition of art/mural elements along the Highway 111 frontage; and color changes from the existing desert beige and tan to neutral grays and painted tile roof. Architectural Review ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 6 of 16 Commission (ARC) approval is required for all commercial façade modifications per Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.68.020 (A). Mr. Melloni stated that staff is supportive of the overall changes and recommends the ARC continue the case and provide design direction. The overall character of the western façade upgrades and eastern façade changes have potential to better match each other. The west side features more contemporary forms, while the eastern side retains some traditional elements, such as the inclusion of cornice trim details. Staff would recommend the overall design more clearly pursue one style. Staff also recommends the forms added to the eastern elevation be simplified in a manner similar to the west elevation. Staff also recommends the applicant diversify the variety of flowering shrubs in the new landscape design to include more color and help add to the visual interest along Highway 111. MR. ADAM GILBERT, property owner, said he was excited to present this project to the City. He purchased the building after sitting empty for about seven (7) years and had a vision to resurrect this dying area of the shopping center. He pushed forward with that vision that has attracted tenants to make this an exciting retail, entertainment venue with restaurants, coffee shops and a fitness studio. To modernize it they are proposing a large façade improvement in order to bring the building to the level that it can be. He pointed out that the building is 100% vacant, as well as the old Tilted Kilt. Essentially they are dealing with a 16,000-square-foot retail shopping center in a dead portion of a shopping center which has been difficult to get tenants to come on board. In order to bring them on board they are proposing an exciting new contemporary design that gives tenants the reassurance that they are going to invest in the property and bring people in so their businesses will be successful. Overall, the shopping center is very eclectic in terms of the design and there are some inherent design flaws with the building that they wanted to change. One is that the current design provides no signage on Highway 111 which makes it impossible for businesses to be seen because you don’t know what is on the other side. On that same note, there is no inlet directly to their building as they are in the middle of the shopping center from Highway 111. So the signage will be extremely important for the success of the center. The change itself has to be significant enough to entice tenants to lease. The tenants he has so far are not national retailers, they are all mom and pops. He has been able to explain to them that they are going to create something that is significant, modern, and will stand the test of time and be willing to invest their time and money into it. Because of the COVID-19 crisis and everything that is going on it is a very scary time for retail. In closing, he would like to ask the Commission for their ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 7 of 16 recommendations and would appreciate a preliminary approval of the project so they can move it forward. MR. GABRIEL LUHAN, designer, presented the elevations and described the articulation of the building. They will employ Art in Public Places for the center, add LED recessed lighting, and improve the landscaping. There will be separate articulations on the different roof types and to tie the whole thing together they will add horizontal elements and vertical elements, apply foam trim and paint the roof black to make the building pop. Commissioner Lambell discussed the proposed monument sign on Highway 111 and suggested that the 8’ tall sign have more articulation, as well as more architectural significance for it to be considered for approval. Mr. Eric Ceja, Principal Planner, said the applicant has two (2) items on the agenda and staff wanted to make sure the building elevations were reviewed first because that will dictate the monument design, as well as the sign placement for the entire center. At this point, the Commission will focus on the building architecture. Commissioner McAuliffe commended the new building owner for taking on a very challenging property. This property, as a gateway to Palm Desert, has significant opportunity with a lot of challenges to overcome. He thinks the owner has articulated very well with what needs to happen and applauds him for taking this on this ambitious path of changing the flavor of the architecture from something a lot more traditional in form to something that is a lot more contemporary and feels they have done a lot of creative things to take it in that direction. He was concerned with the more contemporary forms as they get placed along the façade of the building and said how they interact and engage with the existing form of the building is going to be critical. He referred to a sloping form and said how that element actually turns back or doesn’t is going to either make or break this. As it is presented now, these forms are going to look like they are just pushed up against the building and not an integral part of the architecture. He referred to the little returns on these elements and said how they relate to the existing form will be critical because they will be visible given that they are tapering forms. Those things really need to be carefully studied otherwise this will come across as a Hollywood set and he doesn’t think that is either acceptable nor the owner’s intent. There also seems to be a mix of both very traditional architectural forms and some of the more contemporary and he thinks they are just wrestling with each other. He referred to the patio rail forms that are a very traditional design that are fighting against the architecture. On the Highway 111 side, there are forms that have a very traditional cornice element on them and then there are all the other ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 8 of 16 newly introduced forms that are crisped edged. He thinks they have to take the design completely in this contemporary direction and said not to introduce more of these traditional elements. There are enough of those in there already that they have to overcome. He feels these are little things that can be tidied up that will just further strengthen what they are trying to accomplish. Commissioner McIntosh wanted to thank the building owner for taking this on because the Commission has seen projects come through a few times with unsuccessful solutions. This is a particularly difficult retail environment that hasn’t proven successful for many years. He couldn’t think of another center that is laid out like this where a lack of exposure is the problem. He is concerned that the monument sign or signage alone is not going to be enough to trigger the energy needed to make this a successful project. He feels it would be wise to look at a case study of another center with a similar concept and layout. He asked the owner if he has looked into that. MR. GILBERT said he hasn’t looked at other case studies but agrees that signage alone won’t fix this center. It will take substantial work both in form and the right kind of tenant mix. In addition, they will be doing things along the lines of public art and social media to get people there, such as the food truck festival they held in the parking lot. Again it will not only be the architecture, it will take a lot of work, time and energy and not being a passive landlord. They are working on all these things in addition to the façade. Commissioner McIntosh said he appreciates their enthusiasm because he thinks citizens want to see this project become successful. He and the property owner discussed creating a pedestrian pass-through from Highway 111 to the west side of the building that would allow travelers to see into the center instead of seeing just the back side of the buildings. There is a real synergy that happens in a pedestrian environment. When people see activity, they tend to want to stop and find out what is going on and to be a part of it. They will never get that opportunity with the way it is configured right now. This is an unusual site with chronic problems from the beginning and it might need a really bold move to really make it successful. The Commission and the applicant reviewed the center on Google Earth and MR. LUHAN pointed out the existing areas that are similar to a pass-through. He said the existing areas don’t do anything for the site as they are mainly used for trash enclosures. Commissioner McIntosh said some of the comments about trying to convert this more traditional style of architecture to something contemporary has its challenges and cautioned them about painting the roof tile black. That might work in other areas but this is a very dusty ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 9 of 16 environment but after a couple of heavy dust storms the black tile will look terrible. MR. GILBERT said they initially proposed keeping the red tile roof but didn’t think it would blend with the contemporary look. He said they are to hearing the Commission’s thoughts for any color combinations. Chair Van Vliet commended the owner for their efforts in trying to put this together as this has been an extremely difficult project. He felt that no matter what they do to the architecture on the Highway 111 side it still may not be enough to get people into that center. He thought they could focus on doing something on the parking lot side to create something that attracts people into the center. He said the changes will have to be fairly significant and not minor in nature to get through this Commission. MR. GILBERT is betting they can solve this problem and thinks the signage will be a huge factor in that. He appreciates all the comments and said they will be putting a lot on the line for this project to make it work. He will take the Commission’s comments and suggestions, make changes to the drawings, and continue working with staff to move this along. Commissioner Lambell feels they need to get rid of the traditional architecture and the cornices at the two tower elements. She feels this will trigger some other changes as they look at the Highway 111 side. She suggested they get the architecture stabilized and approved then the Commission can move on to the signage. Commissioner McAuliffe made an edit to Commissioner Lambell’s comment regarding the cornices. He said it’s not that the cornices should necessarily go away. There are plenty of examples of great contemporary cornices. The ones they are seeing here are a very traditional profile and thinks that is the conflict. If they want to remove them that is one direction, but if they can be done in a contemporary profile that is also certainly acceptable. ACTION: Commissioner Lambell moved to continue Case No. MISC 20-0005 subject to: 1) design new tower elements and parapets to appear four-sided and integrated into the building design; 2) carefully study the mix of traditional and contemporary forms; 3) revise design of the Highway 111 frontage to feature more contemporary details and forms and remove more traditional elements on the additions; 4) review case studies of other projects with a similar concept and layout; 5) explore the possibility of a pedestrian path or architectural “pass- through” from Highway 111 to the west side of the building; 6) consider a ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 10 of 16 different color for roof tile; and 10) update the patio rails to feature a contemporary design. Motion was seconded by Commissioner McIntosh and carried by a 6-0-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Schmid and Van Vliet voting YES and Vuksic absent. 4. CASE NO: SARC 20-0004 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: 72221 HIGHWAY 111, LLC, 2496 E. Santa Ynez, Palm Springs, CA 92264 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a new sign program and monument sign for existing retail building: Bump and Grind Plaza. LOCATION: 72-221 Highway 111 ZONE: P.C.-4 Mr. Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner, presented a request to establish a new sign program for the updated Bump and Grind Plaza building. The sign program will establish signage design standards for the seven (7) tenant suites in the building. Signage includes: nine (9) tenant wall signs on the west elevation; seven (7) tenant wall signs on the east elevation; one (1) building identification sign on the east elevation; and, one (1) monument sign along the Highway 111 frontage. The signage standards are clean and consistent with the general signage standards established by the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance under Chapter 25.56 – Signage. The monument sign is designed in a contemporary style inspired by the updated façade. It is constructed from routed aluminum cabinets and stands at a maximum height of 8’-0”. A comprehensive sign program is required for all multi-tenant buildings with three (3) or more tenant spaces per Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.56.100. The Architectural Review Commission (ARC) is the approval authority for comprehensive sign programs per PDMC Section 25.68.060 (C). Staff recommends approval of the proposed sign program standards for the wall signs and require applicant to update exhibits based on the updated elevations for MISC 20-0005. Commissioner Lambell understands the need for this 8’ high monument sign to draw people’s attention to the center and said this needs to be looked at in relationship to the rest of the building once the architecture is determined. Chair Van Vliet pointed out all the signage on the back of the building and was concerned that there would be a lot of variation in the signs. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 11 of 16 He asked about can signs, logos, color, letter sizes and illumination. Mr. Melloni said what is allowed are channel letters, acrylic face or the non- dimensional flush mounted letters. MR. GLENN DAVIS, Signarama, said they want the signs to conform to the City’s sign ordinance and the sign program is being designed to mimic a similar look and feel as seen in many shopping centers that surround the Highway 111 corridor in the mixed-use shopping centers. They want the signage to be flexible in terms of size and proportion and in harmony with the architectural element of the new center’s façade, but they also want to allow flexibility and style and application on a case by case basis. There will be guidelines to steer tenants into a uniform proportion in a similar look and style but they don’t want to restrict it to just reverse channel or face-lit. MR. ADAM GILBERT, property owner, said all of their signs are in conformance with the actual code that is allowed. They didn’t ask for anything over and beyond based on the lateral length of the wall where it will be applied. The only sign that is a little larger than what the code allows is the main sign, Bump and Grind Plaza, that will be located above the art on the center of the building to give name recognition to the center itself. Commissioner Levin asked for the size of the letters. MR. DAVIS didn’t know the actual height of the individual letters but thought they would probably go with something in the 24” range given the overall 47” sign area height they are asking for. Commissioner Levin requested the applicant to label all sign dimensions, letter heights and spacing on fascia. MR. DAVIS stated he will include the dimensions in the sign program. Commissioner Levin referred to the monument sign and stated the rendering didn’t match what was being proposed. After some discussion, MR. GILBERT said they will make those changes. Commissioner McAuliffe asked if the font or fonts are going to be corporate fonts and who will decide that. He also asked if they were allowing different colors for the fonts and corporate logos and if so, how will that be consistent or change between what is on the building and on the monument sign. He said all that needs to be spelled out in the sign program text at the front of the package. MR. GILBERT said they want to be as flexible as possible because there will be a lot of different types of businesses. Commissioner McAuliffe said the variety is certainly fine but it would be appropriate to spell out what those perimeters are as they are defining their sign program. As the graphics present, it looks like everything is the same font, color, size, etc. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 12 of 16 ACTION: Commissioner Lambell moved to continue Case No. SARC 20-0004 subject to: 1) submitting updated building elevations based on design changes to façade update (Case MISC 20-0005); 2) clearly label all sign dimensions, letter heights and spacing on fascia; 3) submit updated renderings; 4) clarify what fonts will be permitted on monument signage in the design guidelines section of the program; and 5) update and further articulate the monument sign based on the architecture of the main building. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Levin and carried by a 6-0-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Schmid and Van Vliet voting YES and Vuksic absent. 5. CASE NO: MISC 20-0011 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: SEAN AND KIM SMITH, 47-817 Sun Corral Trail, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a new side-entry carport 16’ from curb. LOCATION: 47-817 Sun Corral Trail ZONE: R-1, 10,000 Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, presented a request for a new side-entry carport 16’ from curb and presented the renderings and a landscape plan for review. The proposed carport is 519 square feet and is designed to blend into the existing home, while maintaining the Spanish architectural style. In order to accommodate the carport, some existing native landscaping will be removed. The property is zoned R-1, 10,000 and the front yard setback is 20’ from property line. In older neighborhoods, the Zoning Ordinance encourages rehabilitation of older dwelling units and provisions for shaded parking by allowing a side-entry carport structure 16’ from curb. In approving such a setback, the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) must make a determination that a reduced setback will not have a negative impact on the neighborhood, and that the design of the structure is compatible with the existing home. The design and scale of the proposed carport is compatible with the existing home and provides for a nice architectural feature. Installation of the proposed carport would not impact the existing on-site circulation. Staff recommends approval of the proposal with a condition clarifying that the Commission require the applicant to, if feasible, preserve as much existing landscaping as possible. Chair Van Vliet asked for clarification on the area where an overhang and sliders were located. MS. KIM SMITH, property owner, said the ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 13 of 16 overhang will remain and said the designer didn’t draw it into the picture. The Commission reviewed the elevation showing the roof cover on it. Chair Van Vliet hoped it wouldn’t be too visible and thought it would look odd. He asked if the back wall of the carport would be up against that and MS. SMITH said the carport will have to be 2’ behind it because there is a natural built-in bench behind it underneath the palapa so it won’t allow them to build it right on top of the palapa. Commissioner Lambell suggested the applicant ask the designer to submit corrections to the east elevation to show the existing covered area and bench. Commissioner McAuliffe referred to the windows being added to the side of the carport and feels that the tops of the windows are crowding the vegas and given the height of the other openings in the building those windows seem high. He thinks they would look better if they were pulled down to possibly be in line with the head of the slider window and the other window to the right of it. He said just having a little bit of that stepped parapet above will make that carport visually read a lot stronger. ACTION: Commissioner Lambell moved to continue Case No. MISC 20-0011 subject to 1) submitting corrections to east elevation to show existing covered area and bench; 2) lower windows on the side of carport to avoid crowding to visually read stronger; and 3) update lighting on east elevation. Motion was seconded by Commissioner McAuliffe and carried by a 6-0-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Schmid and Van Vliet voting YES and Vuksic absent. B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: MISC 20-0006 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: QUICK QUACK DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Attn: Efrain Corona, 1380 Lead Hill Blvd #210, Roseville, CA 95661 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a new car wash building within the Monterey Shore Shopping Center: Quick Quack Car Wash. LOCATION: 73320 Dinah Shore Drive ZONE: PC-3 Mr. Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, presented a request to construct a new 3,384-square-foot carwash building with vacuum cleaning ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 14 of 16 stations on parcel 8 of the approved Monterey Crossings commercial center. He presented renderings and a color board for review. He reported that the building features a contemporary design characterized by desert appropriate beige, tan, brown, dark yellow colored stucco finishes and masonry veneer. The project includes a desert landscape plan along Dinah Shore Drive, and around the building. Also included is a design for metal canopies to shade the vacuum cleaning stations. The building features a parapet at an average height of 23’ with a tower element up to 29’. All roof-top equipment will be adequately screened. The proposed carwash is located in an area subject to the Monterey Crossings Specific Plan (MCSP). This document establishes allowed uses and design guidelines for all future buildings on the 18 acre site. The MCSP establishes the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) as the approval authority for future buildings within the plan, provided said building is within the scope of the original entitlement. The ARC reviews new buildings for compliance with MCSP guidelines for building design, materials, and development standards. Staff provided comments to the applicant on their original submittal, which included a large amount of stone. The updated design is more in keeping with all applicable requirements of the MCSP. Staff recommends approval of the proposed carwash as presented. Commissioner Lambell asked where the roof access was located. MR. EFRAIN CORONA, Quick Quack, said it is located inside the equipment room. He then pointed out another exterior roof ladder for the quarterback station and stated there is not enough room for an interior roof ladder because the room is too small. Commissioner Lambell said exterior ladders are not allowed in the City. After much discussion, MR. CORONA said they may be able to find some extra room by revising the footprint. Commissioner Levin and MR. CORONA discussed the secondary exit and Mr. Swartz suggested they obtain a determination from Fire whether the secondary exit is needed next to the trash enclosure. Commissioner Lambell said the renderings looked weak and suggested they beef it up. MR. CORONA asked if she was referring to the depth of cap flashing at the top of the parapet. Mr. Eric Ceja, Principal Planner, said the comment made by Commissioner Lambell regarding the thickness or thinness of the architecture is appropriate. He pointed out that the material itself is approved in the specific plan and one of the challenges they have is using the material that has been identified for the entire shopping center and bring that into each and every building within the center itself. MR. CORONA said they matched the center at 8”. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 15 of 16 Commissioner McAuliffe said he is comfortable with the form of the building as presented in the prospective and renderings provided by the applicant. He would be concerned if there were other technical issues, for instance, with the roof plan or equipment not being screened. If staff is comfortable then he is comfortable. Commissioner McIntosh asked if this was a part of the original master plan that they have been reviewing for the past couple of years. Mr. Ceja answered yes and said the specific plan shows this portion of this shopping center as automotive uses. However, he did not previously see a Quick Quack or other type of carwash. Commissioner McIntosh asked if this was adjacent to the CarMax and Mr. Ceja said it is a bit away but it is pushed up against the eastern property of this shopping center which is close to CarMax. Commissioner McIntosh said from what he has seen he has no problem with the architecture. However, because some of the plans were missing from the Commissioner’s packet, he doesn’t want to go on record that he’s approving a project without having a full set of drawings to review. Mr. Ceja suggested the Commission grant preliminary approval for the architecture and staff will email the missing set of plans to the Commissioners for review. If there is a major concern that arises, staff will relay that to the applicant to correct the items as they are preparing their construction drawings. He reminded the Commission that the construction drawings will come back to the Commission for final review. ACTION: Commissioner Lambell moved to preliminarily approve subject to: 1) relocating exterior roof ladder for the quarterback station; and 2) obtain determination from Fire whether the secondary exit is needed next to the trash enclosure. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Levin and carried by a 6- 0-1 vote, with Lambell, Levin, McAuliffe, McIntosh, Schmid and Van Vliet voting YES and Vuksic absent. C. Miscellaneous Items: None ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES May 12, 2020 G:\Planning\Janine Judy\ARC\1Minutes\2020\200512min.docx Page 16 of 16 VI. COMMENTS Discussion of exterior roof ladders. VII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Levin moved to adjourn the Architectural Review Commission meeting at 2:55 p.m. ERIC CEJA PRINCIPAL PLANNER SECRETARY JANINE JUDY RECORDING SECRETARY CITY OF PALM DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner Date: May 26, 2020 Subject: MISC 20-0011 – 47-817 Sun Corral Trail – New Side-Entry Carport 16 feet From Curb Exception Project Summary The project request is for a new side-entry carport 16 feet from curb. The proposed carport is 519 square feet and is designed to blend into the existing home, while maintaining the Spanish architectural style. In order to accommodate the carport, some existing native landscaping will be removed. Zoning Ordinance Summary The property is zoned R-1, 10,000 and the front yard setback is 20 feet from property line. In older neighborhoods, the Zoning Ordinance encourages rehabilitation of older dwelling units and provisions for shaded parking by allowing a side-entry carport structure 16 feet from curb. In approving such a setback, the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) must make a determination that a reduced setback will not have a negative impact on the neighborhood, and that the design of the structure is compatible with the existing home. Staff Recommendation The applicant made the design changes the ARC discussed at the May 12, 2020 meeting. The applicant included the existing canopy structure and the existing bench to the east elevation. The windows on the carport were also reduced in height. The design and scale of the proposed carport is compatible with the existing home and provides for a nice architectural feature. Installation of the proposed carport would not impact the existing on-site circulation. Staff recommends approval of the proposal with a condition clarifying that the ARC require the applicant to, if feasible, preserve as much existing landscaping as possible. Attachment: Exhibits submitted by applicant I EXISTING RESIDENCE EXISTING COVERED AREA f (E) BUILT-IN BENCH TO REMAIN O N N PROPOSED CARPORT 15 SO. FT. 2'-Drr SETBACK o 111-9ki 24'-6" I d I � — • r '+f I'S '' EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN SUCH CORRAL TR. EDUSTING POOL r tF'f }. Yam- '`- • I �����fl I,� ���� f ray ?, �i� EXISTING DRIVEWAY �: '�' r � � �11 '''''�' . {" •1 ;� ,, ti 4 F0 F_ SCOPE OF WORK FRQPQSED STUCCO CARPORT TO MATCH EXISTING HOUSE A. CONSTRUCTION HC"RS; OCTOSER 1 THRU APRIL 30 MAY T THRU SEPTEMBER 30 MONDAY - FRIDAY 7'04 A.M. - 5:30 P.M. MONDAY • FRtaAY 6:fl0 A.M. - 7:00 P.M" SATURDAY 9;00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. SATURDAY 0'04 A.M. - 5:00 P-M. SUND" NOT ALLOWED SUNDAY NOT ALLOWED GOVERNMENT CODE HOL0AYS NOT ALLOWED GW RNi4 ENT CODE HOLIDAYS NOT ALLOWED '41(UQNOFTIiA11MWORK HOL%A031i3ITFEMEEimOM�kMEMT 00PhLCODE Gropx9i�.9� , I I 1 f: _Z: 10 I REFERENCE CODES x L 2?MTFU 7nUH srwu 6- r;WJ r PUTH I 2019CALIFORNIABUILDING.CODE, 2019CALIFORNIA RHIDENCAL CODE 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHAINJCAL CODE 20 15 CALIEORNIA PLI•,tMBING CODE- 2019 CALJFORN A ELECTRICAL CODE 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE. Z19 CALH:ORNIA FIRE CODE 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN STANDARDS CODE (CALGreen) UNDER R UND SERVICE ALERT Know what's blue. Ca II before you dig. PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE- V4- =1 -Q- GENERAL INFORMATION OWNER , SEAN AND KINK 5M1TH 47812 SON CORRAL TR" PALM DESERT CA LEGAL- DESCRIPTION : A-P.N. # &251 92f112 PROJECT ADDRESS'. 47a12 1JN CORRALTR_ PALM DESERT, CA ZONE : R-s OCCUPANCY: SINGLE FAMILY TYPE V NON -RATED NON-SPRINKLERED RE50ENCE AREA TABULATIONS: JE) LOT 15.29 AC (E) RESIDENCE: 2,434.OU SCE- FT, PROPOSED CARPORT: 515.00 SO. FT. SHEET INDEX Al COVER SHEET. SITE PLAN A2 EXISTIN0 DEMOLITION PLA14 & ELEVATION A3 PROPOSEO FLOOR PLAN AN ELEVATIONS A4 aD VIEW LOCATION SITE Ump&C11pr — VICINITY MAP � 0 Z CASHCLA DESIGN ASSOCIATES Carlos Sanchez Daslgri • DRAFTING a DESIGN ■ LAND PLANNING • CARLOS SANCHEZ DESIGNER 45-175 PANORAMA DR. SUITE E PALM DESERT- CA (W) 72-9117-Phone CASHCLA@GMAIL_,C0M These dramgs are an Irfstrumenl of sarvico and remain the pri�Y or CASHOLA DESIGN & AS SOC DATES. They m rmx to no reproduced pr almd to any third party mthim IheexprmvaitierrpermissOof Carlos Sanchez NO. I REV! E ION IMTE PROPOSED CARPORT FOR: SEAN & KIM SMITH 47817 SUN CORRAL TF . PALM DESERT, CA 92260 E.F.{EET T:T LE I COVER SHEET 1] R A W N' SHEET N1LIMBER CSf �:E8 CHECKED KfF 0ATI- May 21. 2020 J013 NO. SCALE AS NOTED 2020-01-05 R EXISTING CONC. DRIVEWAY EXISTING POOL EXISTING RESIDENCE EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0" EXISTING SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0" EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN 16'-0"12'-0"EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED SETBACK SLIDING GLASS DOOR TO BE REMAIN EXISTING COVERED AREA TO REMAIN EXISTING STUCCO TO REMAIN SLIDING GLASS DOOR TO BE REMAIN EXISTING COVERED AREA EXISTING ENTRY GATE WINDOW TO BE REMOVED AND FRAME IN. (E) BUILT-IN BENCH TO REMAIN (E) BUILT-IN BENCH TO REMAIN DRAFTING DESIGN LAND PLANNING CARLOS SANCHEZ 45-175 PANORAMA DR. SUITE E PALM DESERT, CA (760) 272-9117-Phone CASHCLA@GMAIL.COM SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBERD R A W N REVISIONS CS/ FEB C H E C K E D K/F D A T E S C A L E AS NOTED J O B N O. 2020-01-05 R DATE ISSUED FOR: C a r l o s S a n c h e z D e s i g n D E S I G N E R These drawings are an instrument of service and remain the property of CASHCLA DESIGN & ASSOCIATES. They are not to be reproduced or altered to any third party without the express written permission of C arlos Sanchez DATENO. May 21, 2020 CASHCLA DESIGN & ASSOCIATES 1 SEAN & KIM SMITH ---- PROPOSED CARPORT FOR: 47817 SUN CORRAL TR. PALM DESERT, CA 92260 A2 EXISTINGDEMOLITION ■. EXISTING �� STINGT AT RESIDENCE'... - I SLIDING GLASS DOOR TO BE REMAIN EXISTING COVERED 4" CONCRETE SLAB PER AREA FOUNDATION PLAN, I ~' (E) BUILT -lid BENC cal ? REMAIN PROPOSED CARPORT 515 SO - FT. 2X6 STUDS @ 16" O.0 EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXTER[OR WALL WITH � R-21 INSULATION, FIX �, ��� ��_��� FIX WINDOW . A 1_CPF SMACK T — - 4'- " - 2X6 STUDS a 160 G. EXTERIOR WALL WITH PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN FXISTING COVERED AREA TO REMAIN (E) SLIDING GLASS DR. TO REMAIN J EXISTING PALAPA l`puro Irn or-RiArhi STUCCO TO MATCH r_vl0YIAIf'ti 5" 0 ROUND ND, POLE FOOTING PER (E) BUILT-IN BENCH PROPOSED LE" ELEVATION FOUNDATION PLAN, TO REMAIN SCALE:IM _V-0„ 4FFGIDI RELL I;J i rvv 1 uvLcr SCREED. 4" ABOVE EARTH AND " ABODE PAVED AREAS, LIGHT FIXTURE 101 r STUCCO TO MATCH EXISTING NEW 2'-0" X 31*64I FIX WINDOW NEW%00 3'" FIX WINDOW 24 GA. CORROSION RESISTANT WEEP SCREED. 411 ABOVE EARTH AND " ABOVE PAVED AREAS. " 0 ROUND PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE- 1}4" = V-0" 6` 0 ROUND WD. POLE N I ' PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION SCALE; 114H =V-O' CASHCLA DESIGN ASSOCIATES Cerlus Sanchez DesInri DRAFTING # DESiGN a LAND PLANNING GA1 LOS SANCHEZ DESIGNER 45075 PANORAMA DR. SUrTE E PAL.M DESERT r,A (7603 7'-9117-PWme CA$H LA@ MAICCOM These drawgs ara 6rl Iri5bumenl & sumce and 18mabi the pmpoly of CASHC LA 0ESIGN & AS SOCIATE S. They = not to to repmduced or Wared to any third party Mthnol Itre express wrHarr.wrmimo vi Carfos Sanchez NO. REW IONS HATE h PROPOSED CARPORT FOR- SEAN & KIM SMITH 47817 SUN CORRAL TF . PALM DESERT, CA 92260 SHEET TITLE I PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN ELEVATIONS D R A W N SHEET NUMBER CSC PEB CHECKED KF 3 DATS May 21. 2020 SCALE AS NOTED 2020-01-Or) R DRAFTING DESIGN LAND PLANNING CARLOS SANCHEZ 45-175 PANORAMA DR. SUITE E PALM DESERT, CA (760) 272-9117-Phone CASHCLA@GMAIL.COM SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBERD R A W N REVISIONS CS/ FEB C H E C K E D K/F D A T E S C A L E AS NOTED J O B N O. 2020-01-05 R DATE ISSUED FOR: C a r l o s S a n c h e z D e s i g n D E S I G N E R These drawings are an instrument of service and remain the property of CASHCLA DESIGN & ASSOCIATES. They are not to be reproduced or altered to any third party without the express written permission of C arlos Sanchez DATENO. May 21, 2020 CASHCLA DESIGN & ASSOCIATES 1 SEAN & KIM SMITH ---- PROPOSED CARPORT FOR: 47817 SUN CORRAL TR. PALM DESERT, CA 92260 NEW CARPORT AERIAL VIEW SCALE: N.T.S. NEW CARPORT WEST VIEW SCALE: N.T.S. NEW CARPORT EAST VIEW SCALE: N.T.S. A4 3D VIEW CITY OF PALM DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner Date: May 26, 2020 Subject: MISC 20-0012 – 77-730 Mountain View Drive – Single-Family Home Height Exception Project Summary The project is a request for a height exception to construct a 4,837-square-foot single-residence and 477-square-foot detached casita at a maximum height of 17’- 0” from finished grade. The property is a vacant one-acre lot zoned Estate Residential (RE) located at the northwest corner of Mountain View and Latisha Lane. This item previously appeared at the May 12th Architectural Review Commission (ARC) meeting. The ARC directed the applicant and designer to break up the massing of the roof area extending above 15’, consider introducing additional color, articulate the eastern exterior wall of the kitchen and recess the garage door. The applicant redesigned the roof line by breaking up the main gable into multiple adjoining hipped roofs. The exterior color palette has remained the same from the first submittal. The large wall expanse along the eastern elevation has been reduced slightly by the new roof shape and is obscured by the wall enclosing the rear yard. Lastly, the garage doors have been recessed with the use of double- framed walls. Additionally, the applicant has revised the wall placement to conform with the fence and wall ordinance by increasing the setback, adding pilasters and additional landscaping. MISC 20-0012 Page 2 of 2 May 26, 2020 Zoning Ordinance Summary Per section 25.10 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC), the maximum height for structure in the RE zone is 15’. The ARC may grant exceptions for homes to have a maximum height of 18’ based on design merit and neighborhood compatibility. Staff Recommendation Approve the proposed home and granting the exception as proposed. Attachment: Project Plans Custom Home for Gre 9 Jennife. Spates 77-730 Mountain View Palm Desert, 1 ' ck • ., Fit IL' }� F �}X. r L ' I �'` I I , "$ • # # I I Iy' - ■ 1 IL 11 CITY OF PALM DESERT T DUI I IPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS CONSTI U TI f WORKING HOURS DEFERRED SUBMITTALS SHEETINDEX STRUCTURAL 1. Approvud temporary sanIlary facIlI ies (I.e- chemir:al loilet5 shall he on the constructicri site prior to reque!51 for first inspection). SecOrm 5416 of the Health and Safety Code. T1.0 TITLE SHEET 2 Coo [tector and/or owner shall pmvkde a bash bin 10 Insure pfoper clown -up bl-ail bulidirlg materials, {Palm Osseri A+lunicipal Code 15.30} October 1 - April 30 aTrussCalculation's A0. t GENERAL NOTESr ABBV- & SPECS. 3. StDFagO of buiWing rnatrrrials or debris shall bo confined to the dot for which the permit is Issued. Adjacent vacant pfaperties may not be ulilized for This purpose runless written permisslon of the Is >! ha be in From Public Works- Palm Desert Municipal Monday - Friday 7:00 aryl - 5:30 pm Saturday Sunday 8'00 am - :00 PM 9 Fire Sprinkler Plans A1,4 SITE PLAN owner on file with this office. public right-of-way shall rnaiMihed a clear cflnbidurl at all tames unless an encroa;whmaM parmIt rs obtaInail A ,0 FLOOR PLAN Cade, Chapter 8-()2. overnmen! Sole NOT ALLOWED 4, Address numerals shall COrrtpty Ydktfti !#xe i}eim Vlusart Munlciplal Gode� 15.2.6_ Holidays NOT ALLOWED A .1 CASITA FLOOR PLAN, ELEVATIONS & ROOF PLAN A.0 MAIN DOUSE ELEVATIONS 5 All contractors shall have a cta"nt: valid City Busltkess License prior to permit issoance per Palm Ue&ert Municipal Code, Title 5. A3.1 STREET ELEVATION & COLORED STREET ELEVATIOf 6. All contractors and/or awnerlbuilders must subrr>iI Certificate of Worker's OomporlI Insuranco coverage prior to the Issuance of a buildirig permit per CatitorplEa Labor Coda, Section 3700 May I - September 30 pA4.0 ROOF PLAN 7. General contractors and ur mpmof-builders shall complete and submit a SutrCantractofs last Form to the Departrrrent of Code Comp Ilance prior to request fof final inspection per Palm Desert MUnicipai Code, Ordinance No- 60. Monday - Friday 6 '-00 am - 7 00 pm Saturday ur,d�i 8;00 are - �:00 err, turdySu A. The city building inspectar has the authority to request fully revised Flan sheets with -all field changes clouded Wth deltas to be submitted for rl#y fevlew when heishe determine$ the num"r of 11eld Government Ode NOT T ALLOWED revisions warrant such a request. Holidays NOT ALLOWED Violation of the above work hours is a citable offense under Palm DeSe'rt Municipal Code. Section .2.070, PROJECT 1..1MMAF Y AREA TABULATION VICINITY ITY MAP CODE ANALYSIS CONSULTANTS Propoaad single family maideFice Codes Used-- vwr/ I Owner f Applicant: Civil Enginee�. RE5IMNCE 3,91ti SOFT. 4 PrcpasO Caslt,a CASiTA 477 SOFT. Greg & Jennifer Spates Essi hahandeh 2019 California Building Code, Parts 1 73-69 O'keeffe Way Essi Engineering ■ Prapesed Block 1+alls �N41 part Of tills pefmik? TOTAL RESiQEtVCE A,393 .FT_ GARAGE I STORAGE 926 SQ.FT � 0�19 California Residential l Code. Paid . eser Palm Desert, D 9 11 77-570 Springfield Ln.. Ste. � COVERED PATIOS (455 SOFT) _ = 2019 California Electrical Code, Part 3 (760) 409-3578 Palm Desert, CA 92211 TOTAL STI�UC7`URE 5,319 SO, FT. rw 2019 alrfomia Mechanical Code, Part 4 (760) 77 -8400 TOTAL. SITE: 43.995-0 Q-FT. 43,995,E 01 California Plumbing bode, Part Designer: TOTAL E.OTi10VERAGE 12.1% „►,� 201 California Energyr Code, Part 6Title 4 Consultant - 019 California Fire Code, Part 9 Gabriel A. Rios Joan D. Hacker 2019 California Green Building Standards Code, Part 11 Rios Designs Insu-form, Inc. - This project shall/ Comply With the above listed codes, and the 49-901 Cinnabar Lane Coachella, CA 92236 7 -875 Fred Waring Dr., Ste. Palm Desert, CA 92260 ASSES F S PARCEL ## LEGAL DESCRIPTION SITE Palm Desert Municipal Code. (760) 48 -7431 {7 0) 345-1 5 � F- Zoning: Structural: y -,r+.rrill�� ICI r � era Asg1'Iarpour RE - Residential l Estate R.A- Structural Engineering 01 ACRES NET IN PAR 44 FPS 023103E "' 4i J•,1 f,,lnlll 1 .113 6�Fe,ir.rnn'It ,=lira, „INT Construction: 77-570 Springfield Ln.,Suite D Paitrt Desert., CA 92211 3 -3 - 2 1tV PALM DESERT, CA '°" M _ Type -B, Non Raid (760) 3 0- 998 ra�►.ar - Q Lic #67£18 House prink/ r d: Yes NORTH Rev- # Dare S Description Jet) 4 2020-02 C: o . N 314)t l - [� A ra E A n L) -[ CCN D _ rM 06 E CL 1� Uj Uj U) Uj Y � z zLLJ uU d < A < M P W D� LU Z ED L!J 11.E a < wo T-0L'Uino LU a. co Date, 0511712020 Sheet ABBREVIATIONS GENERAL NOTES A/C AIR-CONDITIONING LP LOW POINT 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN COMPLY TO THE FOLLOWING CODES: AB ANCHOR BOLT LT LIGHT ABV ABOVE MATL MATERIAL 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, PART 2.5 ADA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES MAX MAXIMUM 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE PART 1 & 2 ACT MBR MEMBER 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, PART 3 AL ALUMINUM MECH MECHANICAL 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, PART 4 ANOD ANODIZED MED MEDIUM 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, PART 5 APPROX APPROXIMATE(LY) MFR MANUFACTURE(R) 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, PART 6 BED BOARD MIN MINIMUM 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, PART 9 BET BELOW MISC MISCELLANEOUS 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, PART 11 BET BETWEEN MM MILLIMETER BLDG BUILDING MT MOUNT 2. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW THE ALL BLKG BLOCKING METAL DRAWINGS BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURAL, IN BM BEAM N NORTH CAB CABINET (N) NEW MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, OR FINISH WORK. IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPANCYS IN CRC CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE N/A NOT APPLICABLE/NOT THE DRAWINGS, IT SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE DESIGNERS ATTENTION FOR CRC CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE AVAILABLE/ CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SAID WORK IN QUESTION. ANY WORK Cl CAST IRON NOT ALLOWED INSTALLED IN CONFLICT WITH THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CJ CONTROL JOINT NIC NOT IN CONTRACT EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER OR CL CENTERLINE NO NUMBER THE DESIGNER. CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE NOM NOMINAL 3. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS CLG CEILING NOT TO SCALE AND DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK. THE DESIGNER CUR CLEARANCE) 00/ / OVER CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT OC ON CENTER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY DISCREPANCIES IN WRITING FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR CNT COUNT OH OVERHANG TO PROCEEDING WITH SAID WORK. CO CASED OPENING OPP OPPOSITE 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL, IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER TRADES, PROVIDE ALL COL COLUMN PERF PERFORATED CUTTING, PATCHING, REPAIRING, RESTORING AND THE LIKE NECESSARY TO CONC CONCRETE PL PLATE, PROPERTY LINE COMPLETE THE WORK AND RESTORE ANY DAMAGED OR AFFECTED SURFACES CONST CONSTRUCTION PLAM PLASTIC LAMINATE RESULTING FROM THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION CONT CONTINUOUS PLAS PLASTIC TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER AND THE DESIGNER. CT CERAMIC TILE PLF POUNDS PER LINEAR FOOT CRPT CARPET PLUMB PLUMBING 5. ALL EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS, FLASHING, COUNTERFLASHING, EXPANSION DEPT DEPARTMENT POC POINT OF CONNECTION JOINTS, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MAKE THEM DF DRINKING FOUNTAIN PR PAIR WATERPROOF. DIA DIAMETER PROP PROPERTY DIM DIMENSION PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT 6. PROVIDE ELECTROLYTIC ISOLATION BETWEEN DISSIMILAR METALS. DK DARK PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH DIN DOWN PT PAINT 7, ANY STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY DO DITTO PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND DESIGNER, PRIOR TO ANY FABRICATION OR DR DOOR PLWD PLYWOOD INSTALLATION. DWG DRAWING QTY QUANTITY E EAST QUAL QUALITY 8. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE SITE UTILITIES (PLUMBING, (E) EXISTING R RISER ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE AND UNDERGROUND WORK, IF REQUIRED. EJ EXPANSION JOINT RA RETURN AIR ELEV ELEVATION RAID RADIUS 9. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD, FACE OF CONCRETE, FACE OF MASONARY, ELECT ELECTRICAL REF REFER, REFERENCE CENTERLINE OF STEEL, BEAMS OR COLUMNS, (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE). EQ EQUAL REFER REFRIGERATOR EQUIP EQUIPMENT REQ REQUIREMENT 10. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE TO TOP OF CONCRETE SLAB. (UNLESS NOTED EWH ELECTRIC WATER HEATER REQD REQUIRED OTHERWISE). EXH EXHAUST REV REVISION(S) EXP EXPOSED, EXPANSION RH RIGHT HAND 11. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE FRAMING MEMBERS, THEY SHALL EX EXISTING RM ROOM BE SPACED TO PERMIT INSTALLATION OF REQUIRED PIPING / CONDUITS PER CODE. EXT EXTERIOR RO ROUGH OPENING THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL STIFFENERS, FAST FASTEN, FASTENER RWD REDWOOD BRACES AND BLOCKING AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE INSTALLATION. THIS FD FLOOR DRAIN S SOUTH INCLUDES ALL BACKING PLATES FOR RAILINGS, CASEWORK, TOILET ROOM FIE FIRE EXTINGUISHER S&P SHELF -POLE ACCESSORIES, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL OR MISCELLANEOUS FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET SA SUPPLY AIR EQUIPMENT, IF REQUIRED. FF FINISH(ED) FLOOR SCHD SCHEDULE FIN FINISH(ED) SEC SECOND 12. THE REUSE OF ORIGINAL OR ALTERED DRAWINGS, BY THE OWNER, AGENTS FOR FIXT FIXTURE(S) SECT SECTION THE OWNER, OR OTHER PARTIES WITHOUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE FUR FLOOR(ING) SF SQUARE FOOT/FEET DESIGNER IS PROHIBITED. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND FLUOR FLUORESCENT SG SEMI -GLOSS HOLD HARMLESS THE DESIGNER FROM ALL CLAIMS, INJURIES, DAMAGES, LOSSES, FOC FACE OF CONCRETE SHT SHEET EXPENSES AND ATTORNEY FEES ARISING OUT OF THE REUSE OF THESE FOF FACE OF FINISH SHTHG SHEATHING DRAWINGS. FOM FACE OF MASONRY SIM SIMILAR FOS FACE OF STUDS SJ SEISMIC JOINT 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, FS FLOOR SINK ST STEEL METHODS, MATERIALS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES AND THE FT FEET, FOOT STD STANDARD SAFETY PRECAUTIONS/PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK. FTG FOOTING STRUCT STRUCTURAL THEDESIGNER DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE. IN NO GA GAGE, GAUGE SUSP SUSPENDED CASE, DO THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS RELIEVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR GALV GALVANIZED SYM SYMMETRY(ICAL) FROM ANY LIABILITY DUE TO NEGLIGENCE, INCOMPETENCE OR ERRORS OF GI GALVANIZED IRON T TREAD OMISSION. GR GRADE T&G TONGUE AND GROOVE GYP GYPSUM TBD TO BE DETERMINED 14. THE DESIGNER PREPARING THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WILL NOT BE HDR HEADER TBL TABLE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO THESE HDWR HARDWARE THK THICK(NESS) DOCUMENTS. ALL CHANGES TO THESE DOCUMENTS MUST BE SUBMITTED IN HP HIGH POINT TOC TOP OF CONCRETE, TOP OF WRITING AND THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS. HORIZ HORIZONTAL CURB HIM HOLLOW METAL TOPP TOP OF PARAPET 15. DEMOLITION CANNOT BE STARTED WITHOUT OBTAINING WRITTEN NOTICE TO HR HOUR TOS TOP OF STEEL, TOP OF PROCEED FROM THE CITY/COUNTY OF SAID PROJECT. HT HEIGHT SHEATHING HVAC HEATING/AIR-CONDITIONING TOW TOP OF WALL 16. DISPOSE OF DEBRIS, RUBBISH, ETC., AS REQUIRED BY CODE. LEAVE THE WORK IN INCH, INCHES TS TUBE STEEL AREAS BROOM SWEPT CLEAN ON A DAILY BASIS. INT INTERIOR TS TUBE STEEL JT JOINT TYP TYPICAL 17. TEMPORARY SANITARY TOILET FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE GENERAL L ANGLE UNF UNFINISHED CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. LAM LAMINATED UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE LAV LAVATORY VERT VERTICAL 18. BATHROOM ACCESSORIES SUCH AS GRAB BARS, TOWEL BARS, SOAP DISHES, ETC. LB POUND VT VINYL TILE WITH IN WALLS SHALL BE SEALED AGAINST MOISTURE PER C.R.C. LBL LABEL W WEST, W SHAPE LBS POUNDS W/ WITH 19. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER APPLICATION SHALL LED LIGHT EMITTING DIODE WC WATER CLOSET CONSIST OF A 3-COAT PROCESS PER C.R.C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LF LINEAR FOOT/FEET W/0 WITHOUT LATH BASE USING "RIB -LATH" WHERE REQUIRED TO PREVENT SAGGING. THE LH LEFT HAND WP WATERPROOFING PLASTER IS TO BE APPLIED USING THE FOLLOWING: LN LINE 1. SCRATCH COAT 2. BROWN COAT 3. FINISH COAT PLASTER APPLICATION SHALL BE 7/8" MIN. GREEN BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS 20. "ALL" OR "EQUAL" SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO, AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE ITEM. 1. WATER CONSERVING FIXTURES: NEW WATER CLOSETS SHALL USE NO MORE THAN 21. EACH PANE OF SAFETY GLAZING INSTALLED IN HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS SHALL BE 1.28 GALLONS OF WATER PER FLUSH, KITCHEN FAUCETS MAY NOT EXCEED 1.8 GPM, IDENTIFIED (ACID ETCHED, SAND BLASTED, CERAMIC FIRED, ETC.) BY A LAVATORIES ARE LIMITED TO 1.5 GPM, AND SHOWERHEADS MAY NOT EXCEED 2.0 MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION, THE MANUFACTURER OR INSTALLER AND THE GPM OF FLOW. (CPC 403 & 408) SAFETY GLAZING STANDARD WHICH IT COMPLIES. MULTI -PANE ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED PER CRC R308.1. 2. AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION CONTROLLLER(S) INSTALLED BY THE BUILDER SHALL BE IN A PLACE FOR FINAL INSPECTION AND SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: 22. GLAZING IN SWINGING, SLIDING, AND BIFOLD DOORS 9 SQUARE FEET OR LESS SHALL BE A MINIMUM CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION OF I (CPSC 16 PFR 1201) AND II a. CONTROLLERS SHALL BE WEATHER - OR SOIL MOISTURE -BASED (CPSC 15 CFR 1201) WHEN MORE THAN 9 SQUARE FEET OR SLIDING. CONTROLLERS THAT AUTOMATICALLY ADJUST IRRIGATION IN RESPONSE [TABLE R308.3.1 (1), R308.3.1] TO CHANGES IN PLANTS' NEEDS AS WEATHER CONDITIONS CHANGE. 23. GLAZING OVER 9 SQUARE FEET IN AREA WITH BOTTOM EDGE LESS THAN 18" ABOVE b. WEATHER -BASED CONTROLLERS WITHOUT INTEGRAL RAIN SENSORS OR THE FLOOR AND EXPOSED TOP EDGE GREATER THE 36" ABOVE THE FLOOR SHALL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM THAT ACCOUNT FOR LOCAL RAINFALL SHALL BE SAFETY GLAZED. CRC R308.4.5 HAVE A SEPARATE WIRED OR WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR WHICH CONNECTS OR COMMUNICATES WITH THE CONTRILLER(S). SOIL MOISTURE -BASED 24. GLAZING IN DOOR AND ENCLOSURE FOR HOT TUBS, WHIRLPOOLS, SAUNAS, STEAM CONTROLLERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE RAIN SENSOR INPUT. ROOMS, BATHROOMS, SHOWERS LESS THAN 5' ABOVE THE LANDING SURFACE (CALGREEN 4.304.1) SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION OF II (CPSC 16 CFR 1201) CRC TABLE R308.3.1 (1) & 308.4.5 3. SITE SHALL BE PLANNED AND DEVELOPED TO KEEP SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM BUILDINGS. PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER 25. GLAZING ADJACENT TO BOTTOM LANDING OF A STAIRWAY WITHIN 5' HORIZONTALLY THAT SHOW SITE GRADING AND PROVIDE FOR STORM WATER RETENTION AND AND 3' VERTICALLY SHALL BE SAFETY GLAZING. CRC 308.4.7 DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. BMP'S THAT ARE CURRENTLY ENFORCED BY THE CITY ENGINEER MUST BE IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO INITIAL INSPECTION BY THE 26. NEW ONE & TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS SHALL HAVE AN AUTOMATIC RESIDENTIAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT (CGC 4.106.3) SPRINKLER SYSTEM. NFPA-13D (R313.1 & R313.2 CRC) 4. A MINIMUM OF 65% OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE IS TO BE RECYCLED. (CGC 4.408.1) 27. APPLICATIONS FOR WHICH NO PERMIT IS ISSUED WITHIN 180 DAYS FOLLOWING THE DATE OF APPLICATION SHALL AUTOMATICALLY EXPIRE. (R105.3.2 CRC) 5. PROJECTS WHICH DISTURB LESS THAN ONE ACRE OF SOIL SHALL MANAGE STORM WATER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: 28. EVERY PERMIT ISSUED SHALL BECOME INVALID UNLESS WORK AUTHORIZED IS A. RETENTION BASINS COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS AFTER ISSUANCE OR IF THE WORK AUTHORIZED IS B. WHERE STORM WATER IS CONVEYED TO A PUBLIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM, WATER SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS. A SUCCESSFUL SHALL BE FILTERED BY USE OF A BARRIER SYSTEM, WATTLE OR OTHER INSPECTION MUST BE OBTAINED WITHIN 180 DAYS. A PERMIT MAY BE EXTENDED IF APPROVED METHOD (CGC 4.106.2). A WRITTEN REQUEST STATING JUSTIFICATION FOR EXTENSION AND A $250 APPLICATION FEE IS RECEIVED PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OF THE PERMIT AND 6. LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION WATER USE SHALL HAVE WEATHER OR SOIL BASED GRANTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. NO MORE THAN (2) EXTENSIONS MAY BE CONTROLLERS (CGC 4.304.1). GRANTED. PERMITS WHICH MAY BECOME INVALID SHALL PAY A RENEWAL FEE OF 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TO THE 50% OF THE ORIGINAL PERMIT FEE AMOUNT WHEN THE PERMIT HAS BEEN EXPIRED FOR UP TO (1) YEAR. WHEN A PERMIT HAS BEEN EXPIRED FORA PERIOD EXCESS JURISDICTION AGENCY THAT REGULATES WASTE MANAGEMENT, PER CGC 4.408.2. /o OF (1) YEAR, THE RENEWAL FEE SHALL BE 100 OF THE ORIGINAL PERMIT FEE. (R105.5 CRC) 8. THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTION DEVICE LOCATION AND THE RACEWAY TERMINATION POINT SHALL BE PERMANENTLY AND VISIBLY MARKED "EV CAPABLE" 29. IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA GREEN CODE BUILDING STANDARDS CALGREEN 4.106.1.1) CODE, APPLICANT SHALL OBTAIN THE APPROVAL OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. BELOW IS A LIST OF REQUIRED ITEMS TO BE 9. BUILDER IS TO PROVIDE AN OPERATION MANUAL (CONTAINING INFORMATION FOR MAINTAINING APPLIANCES, ETC.) FOR THE OWNER AT THE TIME OF FINAL 1. CONSTRUCTION 1. CONUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MATERIALS TO BE DIVERTED FROM INSPECTION (CGC 4,410.0). DISPOSAL BY RECYCLING, REUSE ON THE PROJECT OR SALVAGE FOR FUTURE USE OR SALE. 10. THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF WOOD SHALL NOT EXCEED 19% BEFORE IT IS 2 SPECIFY IF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MATERIALS WILL ENCLOSED IN CONSTRUCTION. THE MOISTURE CONTENT NEEDS TO BE CERTIFIED SORTED ON -SITE (SOURCE-SEPERHERE OR BULK MIXED (SINGLE STREAM). BY ONE OF 3 METHODS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 4.505.3. BUILDING MATERIALS WITH 3. IDENTIFY DIVERSION FACILITIES WHERE THE CONSTRUCTION AND WASTE VISIBLE SIGNS OF WATER DAMAGE SHOULD NOT BE USED IN CONSTRUCTION. THE MATERIAL WILL TAKEN. MOISTURE CONTENT MUST BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY ONE OF THE 4. IDENTIFY CONSTRUCTION METHODS EMPLOYED TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF METHODS LISTED IN CGC 4.504.3. CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MATERIALS GENERATED. 11. BATHROOM FANS SHALL BE ENERGY STAR RATED, VENTED DIRECTLY TO THE 5. SPECIFY THAT THE AMOUNT OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE OUTSIDE AND CONTROLLED BY A HUMIDISTAT. (CGC 4.506.1) MATERIALS DIVERTED SHALL BE CALCULATED BY WEIGHT OR VOLUME, BUT NOT BOTH. 12. PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION THE LICENSED CONTRACTOR, ARCHITECT, OR 30. 27.12.190 TOP OF FORM HEIGHT AND HORIZONTAL LOCATION CERTIFICATION. - NO ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THE OVERALL CONSTRUCTION MUST INSPECTION OR APPROVAL ON THE BUILDING OR STRUCTURES FOUNDATION PROVIDE TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT SYSTEM SHALL BE GIVEN BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL UNTIL THE CITY ENGINEER ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS FROM THE GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE HAVE HAS RECEIVED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED GRADING PLAN. THE REQUIRED TOP OF BEEN IMPLEMENTED AS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION. (CGC 102.3) FORM HEIGHT AND HORIZONTAL LOCATION CERTIFICATIONS SHALL BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BE A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR CIVIL ENGINEER. (ORD. 1061 2 FIXTURE FLOW RATES (EXIBIT A), 2004: ORD. 514 2 (PART), 1987: ORD. 465 2 (PART), 1986) FIXTURE TYPE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE WATER CLOSETS 1.28 GALLONS/FLUSH URINALS 0.125 GALLONS/FLUSH SHOWERHEADS 1.8 GPM @ 80 PSI LAVATORY FAUCETS 1.2 GPM @ 60 PSI KITCHEN FAUCETS 1.8 GPM @ 60 PSI Rev. # Date & Description Job # 2020.02 � rn 01 N o E E nu \\\\ N N U O 06 a) o) M O c0 rn m ///// T U) QLCOO C N O U =wow E� d Q) r- a)UQ 20 N � E d C � Pa n � U�) u 0- E O a 0 y � � m U W � (� N L N o(� 0 co co O C a � a) Q U 06 ti E rL V U/ Z 00 I- I- v / LLJ Z �QU W ` w 0 i Q �U W W 1-00� 0 D Z Q Cn U < J LLJ W W Z 0. C) rW V = z z w02U) wofF�-cn w ¢O¢0O�QzOwCz7 mw0t-gC6 C7zw Z 2 0xo__ 00_>H_ m K J z O�> w o 0 �Da o ¢ ao!����o!o oU)wcfco Wz�aWOWOLL Z) ¢m�� Om0�0w0 m w w W J = a �m~w 0 Date: 05/17/2020 Sheet AOO 1 GRAVELW 1 1 GENERAL INFORMATION _____________ _________ __ 1 E 6'-0" HIGH I 1 BLOCK WALL 1 OWNER: GR7 R\ 139.57' R CABLE 1 0 MOUNTAIN 1 ------- Z/ o — '`' — ' ' 1 PALM DESERT, CA 1 6'-0" HIGH / (E) PP �� 1 --------------------- ---------------------------- BLDICK w--Lf--------� 1 --------------- ,'------- 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 44 RS 023/ 1 ,------___ \ 1 1 APN:637-300-027 1 -----------_ ,,- , I (1) 24" BOX 1 1 ` CERCIDIUM 1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 77-730 MOUNTAIN \ 1 6'-0" HIGH FLORIDIUM (BLUE 1 1 -' BLOCK WALL PALO VERDE) `, 1 PALM DESERT, CA ��------------------------------------------------------®®® ---------------------------------------------------------- rI 1 ZONING: R1 Von NO r--------w-- ----------------------------------- ------/----------�--------'j'-- -----r----- --------- mmw 1 OCCUPANCY: R-3 TYPE V-B NON -RAT I � I 1 1 � � ' a j � ;r RA L& j ; AREA TABULATIONS I 1 m (E) NATIVE m R 1 1 RESIDENCE 1 W SOIL u 1 U) ; ; I 1 CASITA 1 I III / II III 1 1 II ;� / I 1 1 1 TOTAL RESIDENCE 1 I STENO HI ACACIA ; 1 GARAGE/STORAGE 1 ; I (SHOESTERING 1 COVERED PATIOS (455 SQ.FT.) 1 ACACIA) I ; 1 TOTAL STRUCTURE TOTAL SITE 43, 5,319 / 43,995.6 TOTAL LOT COVERAGE I 1 1 1 (E) 6'-0" HIGH 1 BLOCK WALL I I 1 1 • / I I I Ili I I ; 1 �,�---------------------------------------------------------�'1 1 1 • , / I 6'-0" HIGH 1 1 I 1 i BLOCK WALL 1 1 1 Ii 1 1 1 E)&•-0 HI6H-------------------------------------------------------- 1 i I BOX 1 1 ••�•• — — — — — — — — — BLOCK1 wALL 13SSTe P. (1)24 HIGH IE, PP \ 1 CERCIDIUM CERCIDIUM 1 _ 1 -------------------- - -------- -- CK WALL --- - -- ---- ------ 1 (E) NATIVE I IUM BLUE ( 1 1 - - - ------- I 1 /� SOIL • PALO VERDE) 1 1 �c+s°/' / 6'L"HIGH c1EBaomm FLORIUIUM (BLL`E 1 1 / 1/ eLOCI(W PALovERUE) VEL& TER I 1 r EX. DRYWELL 1 (E)NATIVE 1 ' / / 7 • M I (E)8'L'HIGH SOL — C�<91 ,)zaBOx ACACIA I PAR 45 ;' PAR 44 I BLCCKWPLL _f ," STENOPHLIA (SHOSTERI ACACIA) ACACIA) II I 1 i CASITA 1 (E)NATIVE SOIL I 1 i 477 SQ.FT. 1 i 1'-4" (1.4„x6,_0„ 1 � 1 HIGH PILASSTERS 1 !H 1 / @ 30'-0" O.C. GRAVEL & (1) 24" BOX ACACIA 1 1)24'BOXACACIA STENOPHLIA PLANTER STENOPHLIA I 1 (SHOESTERING ACACIA) (SHOESTERING 1 i ACACIA) 1 I 1---------- 1 I 1 & 1 PLANTER 1 CONC. 1 I WALK 1 I 1 II 1 I II 1 1 I 1 I II 1 II 1 I 1 II 1 I 1 I 1 i II 20 -0 1 I % 7,_1�„ i 30,_0„ Z 1 SETBACK J 1 / I 1 / oCONIC II % N 5,_01. WALKII 1 1 / I 1 4 4 ----------- CONC. 24" BOX = 1 A CERCIDIUM = C 1 � 1 (E)NATI SOLVE FLORIDIUM (BLUE 1 COVERED PATIO PALO VERDE) 1 364 S^FT. � 1 1 II Q — / - I .I 1 I ---I 1 I I 1 I II II / 1 ' 1 1 / GRAVEL & 1 PLANTER it / RESIDENCE 1 3,916 SQ.FT. 1 SETBACK @ 15-0" 1 I i--------ll 1 II I I I 1 I I I�III'I II II 1 I I 1 y L 1 --- ❑ I 9 COVERED ENTRY 1 91-SQ.FT_--- 1 / I ----- 1 I r I I I 1 GRAVE & 1 PLANTER 1 I i II I 1 PLANTER PLAW 1 I I PLANTER - 1 6-0" HIGH\ I BLOCK WALL e v I 1 1 1 (E) 6-0" HIGH HIGH PLANT BLOCK WALL 1 I•\ PLANTER BLO BLOCK WALL 1 I `\ II 1 I \\ 1 GRASS 1 CONC. \ 1 I L \- WALK 1 \ 1 1 I 1 m d El MOUNTAIN 1 - - - - - - I , 1 �• I ., III 1 1 1 II • F 1 1 (E)8'-0'HIGH I (E) NATIVE (1) 24" BOX ACACIA BLOCK WALL SOIL STENOPHLIA 1 1 (SHOESTERING 1 1 ACACIA) 1 1 GRAVEL & 1 1 PLANTER 1------------------ r 1 CONIC. I (E) CURB / I 1 1 _ WALK I ,, 6-0 HIGH I 1 1 I I BLOCK WALL / 1 1 ro 1 1 PAR 45 m � , PAR 44 _ - 1 1 % INN 1 �„ - 1 1 - I I III III 1 • PUNTER , I CONC. WALK iI ; WP , III I 1 1 r CONC. / 1 1 -` CONC. GARAGE DRIVEWAY 'i COVERED PFl10 I L 926 SQ.FT. I / 1 1 • afi4s Fr. 4 • 1 1 ' r / 4" HIGH ILLUMINATED STREET NUMBERS (HE4VETICA BOLD) i I 1 1 ---- VISIBLE ANDGIBLE FROM �i. II I III lil THE STREEI� I r 1 1 P�;,Ea I / I / / i 15 RESIDENCE 3,91860 / KFT. SETBACK @15'-0" _ ir r 1 � I 1 1 ------- / 1 I PLANTER 30'A N" 1 -- SETBACK @ 30' 0" 1 1 / I COVERED ENTRY 9150.FT. - 1 I 1 1 I GRAVE& PLANTER I I 1 1 PDN �R 1 1 PILANTEF PLANTER > ❑\SLY PLANTER HIGH, A a WALL wA4 \1V1______J _ - 1 \\� 1 1 1 ) • BLOCK WALL i 5' -D'HIGH PLANTER BLOCK WALL PLANTER0 0 GRASS PLANTER 15'-0" TALL CALIFORmA FILIFERA (FPAN}PALM 1 I 1 GRA65 ��� — --- CONC. WALK - - - (1) 24" BOX ACACIA 1 , ' STENOPHLIA 1 I 16LTALL CALIFDRN9S" (SHOESTERING 1 GRASS I ACACIA) I 1 1 • 1 1 (1) 24" BOX ACACIA 1 1 1 15-0'TALL � 'oo RUIERA IF9d)PALM CALIFORNIA FILIFEFR �� IFANI PALM p GRASS (1)24'BOX ACACIA F (1) 24- BOX ACACIA STENOPHLIA STENOPHLIA (SHOESTERING _ (SHOESTERINGACACIA) STENOPHLIA I 1 ACACIA)— (SHOESTERING ACACIA) 1 1 GRASS PAR 45 I1 ; o El" PAR 45 GRASS CERCIDIUM Box CERCIDIUM 1 1 a ----- FLORIDIUM (BLUE 1 1 (E)C..RB PALO VERDE) 1 1---------------------------------------- 139.57' R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1 1 ------------------- MOUNTAIN Lw6i 1 VIEW LANE 1 1 ------------------- (E)CURB ` 1`--------------------------------® / ------------------- 1 \ \ 1 ` 1 -----(14a)---/ I 1 1 1 VIEW LANE 1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN •---------------------------------------------------------------L-�� SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" NORTH — — — — —'— — — — NNO — r = —I — 8'-O'HIGH (E)NATIVE SOIL r-0x PIR.ASTE HIGH4).OG E � 3PL' O C- IS)NATIVE SOIL GRAVEL& PLANTER I CONC. GARAGE DRIVEWAY / 926 SG.FT. i I - - - in �P HIGH ILLUMI Af TED STREET NDMO HS MELNETILA BOLDI PLANTER GRASS GRASS I I ) 24• BOX I CERCIDIUM ' FLORIDIUM (BLUE FLORI DIUM (BLUE PALO VERDE) — NO11 � I (1) 24' SO* ACACIA 1 STENOPHGA (SHOESTEI NG ACACIA) I 1 1 I ; 1 I 1 1 1 1)24•BOX I 1 CERCIDIUM FLORIDIUM(BLUE 1 PALOVERDE) I 1 EX. DRYWELL I 1 1 I 1 1 1 (1)24'BOX ACACIA SI (SHOESTERING ACACIA) w 1 gl 1 1 1 I 1 1)24 BOX i 1 CERCIDIUM FLORID(BLUE PALO VERDE) gl 1 1 1 1)24"130XACACIA; I STENOPHLN (SHOESTERING , ACACIA) 1 (E)CURB 1 1 I 1 1 1 I ; I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1)24°8OXACACIA 1 STENOPHLIA 1 (SHOESTERING ACACIA) I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 I 1 1 1 ----------TJ 1 ---- ®-------r 't ENTIRE SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" Rev. # Date & Description Job # 2020.02 rn � iT m �0 E E a� CD U O n®u////J \\\\ 06 a) N O M N 7 L U (n U) Q Lo a - uLp—O c " GO yro Ur,a)0o-2 E m m U .. Pa u 0- E O a o m U 4-1 O-) (� a)") (D m (D ^L1 C L N o O 0 U O co O W z L< CO 0) U 06 Q E ~ (aC rN V Z J a. W WC) v / 0 Z J W V / Y z Z wo w ¢p m m w wo_��� mworgUj (=a- C7zw 0 'w Z W 20w JZOfn> 0¢ Pw ou)wwca Z)pa�m Z> a 0= twn 0 C) o U) 0 A Of m w H U H 0 0) W Ei Date: 05/17/2020 Sheet Al 0 5'-4" 8'-5" 25 SQ.FT. 5050 XO 5'4" 1,1'-5" 24'-0" 94'-2" 2'-5" I. 2'-6" 6'-0" 4'-11" 30'-10" SITTING ROOM 3080 9'-0" CL'G FRENCH 24 SQ.FT. �N PR. 3980 BARN DRS. iv - - - - - - - - - - (V 1 n u) N U O iv ar- io 5'_52' 4'-6" L' 6, °" 1�� 4,-6„ � 5-52 ,_0,a 0 O = I I°"LL coM M Z Q w �N (YI co 9 MASTER BEDROOM LL LL 9'-0" CUG COVERED PATIO = N 1 U-0" CL'G LL V1 r o awe th X M I fo u7�In NLL N uJ co 0 I SUN M oU'L ' L 36 SQ.FT. w 36 SQ.FT. ( -I 4680 FIXED i v 4680 FIXED 04 DINING AREA 0 - - 9'-0" CL'G +36" xo O 4 2680 754"x64 9'-0" CL'G N ��8'-0" �N SOFFIT I I �v 0 3 _g" 11'-6" 2' 5" I +16" BENCH O - - +36" CABS. I -IN N w ® MASTER z68o I�---- s LLwx BATH oD d U o TUB 9'-0" CL'G CID " m 0 O GREAT ROOM 8'-0" SOFFIT MASTER ® FIREPLACE 1U-0"CL'G +48" CLOSET N o KITCHEN RANGE 9'-0" CL'G III '-0" CL'G W/ DBL. OVEN L 24.32 --O' S-0„ 4,_6„ 4,_0„ 2, 0„ +34 - - - - CABS. +36" 4-41 CAB. oho- CVj� 1 _8 „ 8" z 2,_5�„ 2 2'-8" k6il 2880 HALL 1 8'-0" SOFFIT v 10 S.F. 9'-0" CL'G � S.H. 2050 - CID O - - - - +36" o +48" REF U 0 0 LL x �N II - - - 3080 S.C. u) 4 o O o m BEDROOM 2 9'-0" SOFFIT N o m 7 o N n 0 r------ 9,_0„CL,G m II - N - li d II I PANTRY I II m I II I DEN 9'-0" CUG +36" I I I 0 Cl)I. I ENTRY I 9'-0-o CUG SIN I I I I I LL I 10'-0" CL'G I 5° I I I I I I I I III -71­I I II �? TO LO. M II L--------J o LAUNDRY I I I I� �; 0 V-0" SOFFIT 0 m 2880 9'-0" CUG I I I z o m a {-- 2060 5060 XO I I I I I �N O - T m Lg,_O„ FIXED 30 SQ.FT. 3080 +42 I D D W r36 J LE uwi o _ q �_ o w x o ih BEDROOM 3 12 S.F. FRENCH R. I I o M o 0 0 m o _ o SOFFIT 9,_0„ CL,G COVERED ENTRY - q sQ.Fr. """`��� I I `° N 'D I 1 V-0" CL'G u' a I II ------------- - 26so 0 HALL POWDER I I --o - - - - - - - - - - 9'-0„CL,G 9'-0"CL'G ui o ¢ 3 CAR GARAGE =-IN M 2880 �N h O 9'-0" CL'G I I o L xx LL �N a s ® +34" � n 1 0 m ? 34 +34„ ®® o M = O O N 00 �N O ® O ® N ' O 00 O BATH 2 CO N TUB/ N TUB/ 10 In o SHWR 9'-0" CL'G BATH 3 SHWR BATH 4 SHWR I I 2680 �268�0 9'-0" CL'G 9'-0" CL'G I 0 _ 2680 2680 ', I 0 I I a 2680 ih 1 v 4,_0„ 4'-OZ" I z O o N I co - CID N M I IU N I I CLO, PR. 3080 BI-PASS DRS. PR. 3080 BI-PASS DRS. I � 9'-0" CL'G I I � Y L- L FD o BEDROOM 4 0 LL N 9'-0" CL'G U) o o o N m O -IN r N BEDROOM 5 BEDROOM 6 HOLIDAY STORAGE AREA o 13,_5„ 9,_0„ CL,G v 9,_0„ CL'G in o 2060 2060 2060 FIXED FIXED FIXED 12 S.F. 12 S.F. 12 S.F. 5050 XO - 25 SQ.FT. � SIN v ❑ N +18" SEAT W/ 0 0 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /4"=1 '-0" LEGEND 0 2x6 WALLS 2x4 WALLS AO WINDOW CALL OUT -REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE, SHT. A10.0 O DOOR CALL OUT - REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE, SHT. A10.0 FLOOR PLAN NOTES INDICATES PLAN NOTES - SEE NUMBERS BELOW: l22.5" X 33": ** SINGLE WHITE FARM SINK WITH GARBAGE DISPOSAL. 2� BUILT-IN DISHWASHER. (VERIFY DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECS.) l PROVIDE 49" ** CLEAR REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH ROUGH PLUMBING FOR ICE MAKER. (RECESS IN WALL). l48" SPACE FOR RANGE W/ HOOD, LIGHT AND FAN. VENT TO OUTSIDE AIR MIN 100 CFM. (VTOSA) PROVIDE 30 INCH CLEARANCE ABOVE RANGE TO UNPROTECTED COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL, OR 24 INCH CLEARANCE TO METAL VENTILATING HOOD. l 21"X21" UTILITY SINK.** lTANKLESS WATER HEATER - BY: RINNAL MODEL: V65e (REU-VC2025W-US) ANSI Z21.10.3 - CSA 4.3, OR APPROVED EQUAL. SEE T24 SHT. lF.A.U. PROVIDE 18" HIGH WOOD FRAMED AND DRYWALL WRAPPED PLATFORM FROM HOUSE SLAB ELEVATION. PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR. PROVIDE CONDENSATION LINE TO OUTSIDE OR AN APPROVED DRAIN FOR AIR CONDITIONING. THE F.A.U. CLOSET OR ALCOVE MUST BE 12" WIDER THAN THE FURNACE OR FURNACES BEING INSTALLED. ElPROVIDE WASTE AND WATER FOR WASHING MACHINE IN RECESSED WALL BOX. lPROVIDE MIN. 4" DRYER VENT UP WALL TO OUTSIDE AIR WITH BACK DRAFT DAMPER. MAXIMUM LENGTH IS 14 FEET WITH MAXIMUM OF TWO 90-DEGREE ELBOWS. SHALL BE METAL AND SHALL HAVE SMOOTH INTERIOR SURFACES WITH NO SCREWS OR OTHER FASTENERS THAT WILL OBSTRUCT FLOW. 10. 2X6 STUD WALL AT 16" O.C. W/ R-19 INSULATION AT ALL EXTERIOR WALLS (WHERE OCCURS). 11. 2X6 PLUMBING WALL 12. 2X4 STUD WALL AT 16" O.C. 13. DEAD BOLT INACTIVE DOOR AT TOP AND BOTTOM. (EXTERIOR) 14. CERAMIC TILE* SHOWER PAN AND CURB WITH CERAMIC TILE WAINSCOT TO 96" OVER TWO COATS PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER AND FELT AT ADJACENT WALLS. SEE PLAN FOR PAN SIZE. PROVIDE SAFETY GLASS ENCLOSURE AS SHOWN. SHOWER HEAD AT 84". CONTROL VALVES MUST BE PRESSURE BALANCED OR HAVE THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVES. *** 15. TEMPERED GLASS. 16. (N) 36"x60" FREE STANDING TUB. PROVIDE FLOOR MOUNTED PLUMBING. 17. 1-3/8" SOLID CORE DOOR WITH AUTOMATIC SELF -CLOSING, SELF LATCHING DEVICE AND WEATHER STRIPPING TO BE TIGHT FITTING. 20 MINUTE RATING W/ SMOKE GASKETS. 18. CENTER OF WATER CLOSET TO BE A MINIMUM OF 15" TO VERTICAL SURFACE OF SIDES. WATER CLOSET SHALL BE "ULTRA LOW FLUSH" WITH 1.6 GAL. MIN. 19. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY BLOCKING FOR TOILET PAPER HOLDER AND/OR TOWEL BARS. 20. COUNTERTOP AND/OR CABINETS. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR HEIGHT. 21. UPPER CABINETS 22. BATHROOM COUNTERTOP AND/OR SINK. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR HEIGHT. 23. FIREPLACE MANUFACTURED BY: NAPOLEON PRODUCTS, VECTOR SERIES MODEL #LV-50N-2, DIRECT -VENT GAS FIREPLACE. LISTING - ANSI Z223.1/NFPA 54. DRAFT STOP REQUIRED AT THE CEILING OR SIDE WALL LEVEL WITHIN THE SHAFT. GAS LOG STARTER SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE HEARTH AREA, BUT NOT MORE THAN 36" FROM FIREPLACE. 24. PROVIDE HEARTH WITH 12" EXTENSION PAST BOX ON EACH SIDE AND 20" DEPTH AT FRONT. 25. PROVIDE ILLUMINATED STREET NUMBERS VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET. 26. EXTERIOR LANDING ELEVATION SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE INTERIOR FINISHED FLOOR THRESHOLD HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2". LANDING SHALL ALSO BE LEVEL EXCEPT THAT EXTERIOR LANDING MAY HAVE A SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 1/4 UNIT VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS (2% SLOPE) 27. GARAGE WALL, CEILING, AND SUPPORTING POSTS OR COLUMNS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH 5/8" TYPE "X" DRYWALL. THE FIRE WALL IN GARAGE SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM THE FLOOR TO THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOF SHEATHING. DUCTS PENETRATING THE GARAGE FIREWALL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 26-GAGE STEEL. 28. 10" SOLATUBE - REFER TO ROOF PLAN FOR DETAILS. 29. PROVIDE 36" ** CLEAR REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH ROUGH PLUMBING FOR ICE MAKER. (RECESS IN WALL). 30. SINGLE HOLE WALL MOUNTED POT FILLER FAUCET. 31. FIREPLACE MANUFACTURED BY: HEAT & GLO, MODEL #ST-550-TM-IPI, DIRECT -VENT GAS FIREPLACE. LISTING -ANSI Z21.88-2014. DRAFT STOP REQUIRED AT THE CEILING OR SIDE WALL LEVEL WITHIN THE SHAFT. 32. INSTALL "QUIET BATT" SOUNDPROOFING INSULATION. 33. 72" X 48"** CUSTOM FIBERGLASS TUB / SHOWER COMBO. CERAMIC TILE* TO 96" OVER TWO COATS PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER AND FELT AT ADJACENT WALLS. PROVIDE SAFETY GLASS ENCLOSURE** AS SHOWN. SHOWER HEAD AT 84". CONTROL VALVES MUST BE PRESSURE BALANCED OR HAVE THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVES. *** 34. 18"x18" SOAP NICHE IN WALL. 35. IF NOT A COMPONENT OF A REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS (NOT MAIN ENTRY), A THRESHOLD NOT EXCEEDING 7.75" MUST BE SHOWN AND DOOR MAY NOT SWING OVER AN ELEVATION CHANGE. (R311.3 CRC) 36. ALL DOORS LEADING INTO AREAS THAT HAVE POOL/SPA ACCESS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH ALARMS (CBC 3109.4) 37. (N) 36" HIGH, 3" DIA., STEEL PIPE W/ 12" DIA. X 12" DEEP FOOTING TO PREVENT FROM VEHICLE IMPACT. * VERIFY ALL FINISHES WITH OWNER / GENERAL CONTRACTOR. ** VERIFY ALL SIZES WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. ** IN SHOWER & BATHTUB AREAS MATERIALS OTHER THAN STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS SHALL BE OF A TYPE THAT IS NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY MOISTURE. PROVIDE WATER-RESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD UNDER TUB AND SHOWER ENCLOSURE MATERIALS TO A HEIGHT OF 70" MINIMUM ABOVE THE DRAIN INLET. NOTES 1. CUMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE PLACED LESS THAN 6" FROM THE FIREPLACE OPENING. 2. EXCEPT FOR FIREPLACES THAT OPEN TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, THE HEARTH SLAB SHALL BE READILY DISTINGUISHABLE FROM THE SURROUNDING OR ADJACENT FLOOR. 3. HOT MOPPED SHOWER PAN SHALL BE INSPECTED UPON COMPLETION OF HOT -MOPPING AND SHALL BE FILLED WITH WATER FOR INSPECTION (CPC 408.7.1) 4. DOOR & WINDOW NUMBERS CORRESPOND TO NUMBERS ON THE CFIR-PRF-01 (PART 4 OF 9) SHEET OF THE TITLE 24 REQUIREMENTS.O AREA TABULATIONS RESIDENCE CASITA TOTAL RESIDENCE GARAGE/STORAGE COVERED PATIOS (455 SQ.FT.) 3,916 SQ.FT. 477 SQ.FT. 4,393 SQ.FT. 926 SQ. FT. TOTAL STRUCTURE 5,319 SQ.FT. Rev. # Date & Description Job # 2020.02 oI � rn N o E E 1- IX N U y N M O � L N U ¢ . : U 000 u N O II fl A E N (o N N N h N UQ go y oS N E m o C � m C) �a n Ila E O a 0 y U JCJ }I r (� N rn U m 0 o CD 0 U Q co L � N Z O a- U 06 ti E rL V Z l< ^J I..L O O .j LL Z Z z w I w02m wJI��cn w mwpr�ui ¢ O¢ 0 O 0 a Z O W 0 m�� m OxLL_ Zgom�ZOI 0¢ ��¢LLw<U0�WO (will>LL0=0(wi�0umi0 w �_w0mw x w m w 0 Date: 05/17/2020 Sheet A200 0 io N �9'-1" T.O.P FOAM TRIM W. PLASTER OVER 7/8" EXTERIOR PLASTER (3 COP F.F. 0" ;�EG' -8 T-102' 9 fN a O TUB/ CASITA I10. N b SHWR CASITA BATH '-0" CD v 9'-0" CUG N 00 CL'G N 04 �w LL x O d m Lo U) o ON LO DESK TYP q io N CASITA T.V. o 9'-0" CUG m 17'-3" w l~L 4 d u-- n Lo (4 0 00 LO xLL LM �z0 Ir N 112'-9" TOP OF ROOF �9'-1" T.O.P. FOAM TRIM W. PLASTER OVER 7/8" EXTERIOR PLASTER (3 COP 0 8 - �F.G. T-0" I. T-0" I. 2'4" CASITA FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" rA.qITA SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4"=V-0" CASITA NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4"=V-0" 8050 XOX 40 SQ.FT. 112'-9" TOP OF ROOF �9'-1" T.O.P FOAM TRIM W. PLASTER OVER 7/8" EXTERIOR PLASTER (3 CO/ F.F. 0" 112'-9" TOP OF ROOF �9'-1" T.O.P. FOAM TRIM W. PLASTER OVER 7/8" EXTERIOR PLASTER (3 COP FF 0 G. - �8 0 ti4o 34:12/R w C\l3i vy 0 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1 /4"=V-0" rA.qITA WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4"=1 '-0" CASITA EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4"=V-0" LEGEND 0 2x6 WALLS 2x4 WALLS AO WINDOW CALL OUT -REFER TO WINDOW SCHEDULE, SHT. A10.0 O DOOR CALL OUT - REFER TO DOOR SCHEDULE, SHT. A10.0 FLOOR PLAN NOTES INDICATES PLAN NOTES - SEE NUMBERS BELOW: l22.5" X 33": ** SINGLE WHITE FARM SINK WITH GARBAGE DISPOSAL. 2� BUILT-IN DISHWASHER. (VERIFY DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECS.) 3❑ PROVIDE 49" ** CLEAR REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH ROUGH PLUMBING FOR ICE MAKER. (RECESS IN WALL). 48" SPACE FOR RANGE W/ HOOD, LIGHT AND FAN. VENT TO OUTSIDE AIR MIN 100 CFM. (VTOSA) PROVIDE 30 INCH CLEARANCE ABOVE RANGE TO UNPROTECTED COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL, OR 24 INCH CLEARANCE TO METAL VENTILATING HOOD. 21"X21" UTILITY SINK.** El ElTANKLESS WATER HEATER - BY: RINNAL MODEL: V65e (REU-VC2025W-US) ANSI Z21.10.3 - CSA 4.3, OR APPROVED EQUAL. SEE T24 SHT. F.A.U. PROVIDE 18" HIGH WOOD FRAMED AND DRYWALL WRAPPED PLATFORM FROM HOUSE SLAB ELEVATION. PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR. PROVIDE CONDENSATION LINE TO OUTSIDE OR AN APPROVED DRAIN FOR AIR CONDITIONING. THE F.A.U. CLOSET OR ALCOVE MUST BE 12" WIDER THAN THE FURNACE OR FURNACES BEING INSTALLED. PROVIDE WASTE AND WATER FOR WASHING MACHINE IN RECESSED WALL BOX. lPROVIDE MIN. 4" DRYER VENT UP WALL TO OUTSIDE AIR WITH BACK DRAFT DAMPER. MAXIMUM LENGTH IS 14 FEET WITH MAXIMUM OF TWO 90-DEGREE ELBOWS. SHALL BE METAL AND SHALL HAVE SMOOTH INTERIOR SURFACES WITH NO SCREWS OR OTHER FASTENERS THAT WILL OBSTRUCT FLOW. 10. 2X6 STUD WALL AT 16" O.C. W/ R-19 INSULATION AT ALL EXTERIOR WALLS (WHERE OCCURS). 11. 2X6 PLUMBING WALL 12. 2X4 STUD WALL AT 16" O.C. 13. DEAD BOLT INACTIVE DOOR AT TOP AND BOTTOM. (EXTERIOR) 14. CERAMIC TILE* SHOWER PAN AND CURB WITH CERAMIC TILE WAINSCOT TO 96" OVER TWO COATS PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER AND FELT AT ADJACENT WALLS. SEE PLAN FOR PAN SIZE. PROVIDE SAFETY GLASS ENCLOSURE AS SHOWN. SHOWER HEAD AT 84". CONTROL VALVES MUST BE PRESSURE BALANCED OR HAVE THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVES. *** 15. TEMPERED GLASS. 16. (N) 36"x60" FREE STANDING TUB. PROVIDE FLOOR MOUNTED PLUMBING. 17. 1-3/8" SOLID CORE DOOR WITH AUTOMATIC SELF -CLOSING, SELF LATCHING DEVICE AND WEATHER STRIPPING TO BE TIGHT FITTING. 20 MINUTE RATING W/ SMOKE GASKETS. 18. CENTER OF WATER CLOSET TO BE A MINIMUM OF 15" TO VERTICAL SURFACE OF SIDES. WATER CLOSET SHALL BE "ULTRA LOW FLUSH" WITH 1.6 GAL. MIN. 19. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY BLOCKING FOR TOILET PAPER HOLDER AND/OR TOWEL BARS. 20. COUNTERTOP AND/OR CABINETS. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR HEIGHT. 21. UPPER CABINETS 22. BATHROOM COUNTERTOP AND/OR SINK. SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR HEIGHT. 23. FIREPLACE MANUFACTURED BY: NAPOLEON PRODUCTS, VECTOR SERIES MODEL #LV-50N-2, DIRECT -VENT GAS FIREPLACE. LISTING - ANSI Z223.1/NFPA 54. DRAFT STOP REQUIRED AT THE CEILING OR SIDE WALL LEVEL WITHIN THE SHAFT. GAS LOG STARTER SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE HEARTH AREA, BUT NOT MORE THAN 36" FROM FIREPLACE. 24. PROVIDE HEARTH WITH 12" EXTENSION PAST BOX ON EACH SIDE AND 20" DEPTH AT FRONT. 25. PROVIDE ILLUMINATED STREET NUMBERS VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET. 26. EXTERIOR LANDING ELEVATION SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE INTERIOR FINISHED FLOOR THRESHOLD HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2". LANDING SHALL ALSO BE LEVEL EXCEPT THAT EXTERIOR LANDING MAY HAVE A SLOPE NOT TO EXCEED 1/4 UNIT VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS (2% SLOPE) 27. GARAGE WALL, CEILING, AND SUPPORTING POSTS OR COLUMNS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH 5/8" TYPE "X" DRYWALL. THE FIRE WALL IN GARAGE SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM THE FLOOR TO THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOF SHEATHING. DUCTS PENETRATING THE GARAGE FIREWALL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 26-GAGE STEEL. 28. 10" SOLATUBE - REFER TO ROOF PLAN FOR DETAILS. 29. PROVIDE 36" ** CLEAR REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH ROUGH PLUMBING FOR ICE MAKER. (RECESS IN WALL). 30. SINGLE HOLE WALL MOUNTED POT FILLER FAUCET. 31. FIREPLACE MANUFACTURED BY: HEAT & GILD, MODEL #ST-550-TM-IPI, DIRECT -VENT GAS FIREPLACE. LISTING -ANSI Z21.88-2014. DRAFT STOP REQUIRED AT THE CEILING OR SIDE WALL LEVEL WITHIN THE SHAFT. 32. INSTALL "QUIET BATT" SOUNDPROOFING INSULATION. 33. 72" X 48"** CUSTOM FIBERGLASS TUB / SHOWER COMBO. CERAMIC TILE* TO 96" OVER TWO COATS PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER AND FELT AT ADJACENT WALLS. PROVIDE SAFETY GLASS ENCLOSURE** AS SHOWN. SHOWER HEAD AT 84". CONTROL VALVES MUST BE PRESSURE BALANCED OR HAVE THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVES. *** 34. 18"x18" SOAP NICHE IN WALL. 35. IF NOT A COMPONENT OF A REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS (NOT MAIN ENTRY), A THRESHOLD NOT EXCEEDING 7.75" MUST BE SHOWN AND DOOR MAY NOT SWING OVER AN ELEVATION CHANGE. (R311.3 CRC) 36. ALL DOORS LEADING INTO AREAS THAT HAVE POOL/SPA ACCESS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH ALARMS (CBC 3109.4) 37. (N) 36" HIGH, 3" DIA., STEEL PIPE W/ 12" DIA. X 12" DEEP FOOTING TO PREVENT FROM VEHICLE IMPACT. VERIFY ALL FINISHES WITH OWNER / GENERAL CONTRACTOR. * VERIFY ALL SIZES WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. ** IN SHOWER & BATHTUB AREAS MATERIALS OTHER THAN STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS SHALL BE OF A TYPE THAT IS NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY MOISTURE. PROVIDE WATER-RESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD UNDER TUB AND SHOWER ENCLOSURE MATERIALS TO A HEIGHT OF 70" MINIMUM ABOVE THE DRAIN INLET. NOTES 1. CUMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE PLACED LESS THAN 6" FROM THE FIREPLACE OPENING. 2. EXCEPT FOR FIREPLACES THAT OPEN TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, THE HEARTH SLAB SHALL BE READILY DISTINGUISHABLE FROM THE SURROUNDING OR ADJACENT FLOOR. 3. HOT MOPPED SHOWER PAN SHALL BE INSPECTED UPON COMPLETION OF HOT -MOPPING AND SHALL BE FILLED WITH WATER FOR INSPECTION (CPC 408.7.1) 4. DOOR & WINDOW NUMBERS CORRESPOND TO NUMBERS ON THE CFIR-PRF-01 (PART 4 OF 9) SHEET OF THE TITLE 24 REQUIREMENTS.O AREA TABULATIONS RESIDENCE CASITA 3,916 SQ.FT. 477 SQ.FT. TOTAL RESIDENCE 4,393 SQ.FT. GARAGE/STORAGE 926 SQ.FT. COVERED PATIOS (455 SQ.FT.) TOTAL STRUCTURE 5,319 SQ.FT. Rev. # Date & Description Job # 2020.02 0) (6 rn N o E E N U N M N C) L 5 a u U C U) Q >, N ❑ : U II fl A N (O N E -O N N h N UQ 10E__6 06 v) E °� �mU.. n � Ila _FzC E O )o y D' ❑ U W 7- -1-0 r (z N 0-) (� W ^L^,, C L N o o 0 U L C! (1) Z a- O� N Q U 06 ti ~ E •• (6 ^0) W rL V rn� U/ Z 0 a J 1..� W Qz0 U Q 0 nJ 1..� Ax 0 0 J H z w Z Z o¢wo w02(n Ww�_ (- w ¢O¢00�aZOw(Z.7 m LU C6 CZ�zw of 000xLLm- F O_p 2 Zm3:w❑❑l0¢�¢LLaf<0 uU0�WO ❑U)LW (0-> CoDa?:w LL m0(4❑(040 w m w w �W0Ofw Lu CO w 0 Date: 05/17/2020 Sheet A201 17'-0" TOP OF RO 115'-3" TOP OF RO 12'-8" TOP OF RO ��12'-0" TOP OF ROi 0- 1"T.O.P FOAM TR PLASTER O" 7/8" EXTE PLASTER Q10 0F.O" �G. 8 16-3 1/2" TOP C e 14'-9 1/2" TOP C 0 10'-1" T.O.P. W9'-1" T.O.P. FOAM TRIM W. PLASTER OVER 7/8" EXTERIOR PLASTER (3 COI F. F. 0" VF.G. -8 _ 117'-0" TOP OF R 113'-5" TOP OF R -2" TOP OF R 0"TOP OFR �10'-1" T.O.P. �9 1" T.O.P. FOAM TRIM W. PLASTER OVER 7/8" EXTERIOR PLASTER (3 CO/ F. F. 0" �_F G -811 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4"=1 '-0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" 15'-3" TOP OF R( 44'-9 1/2" TOP OI e12'-8" TOP OF R( 09'-1" T.O.P. F.F. 0" � G.-8 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" 'TOP OF ROOF 'TOP OF ROOF 'TOP OF ROOF 9'-1" T.O.P'-& F.F. 0" F.G.- /2" TOP OF ROOF -8" TOP OF ROOF -8" TOP OF ROOF -0" TOP OF ROD 10'-1" T.O.P� 9'-1" T.O.P—& 2-1Is F.F. 0" F.G. -0" TOP OF ROOF -7" TOP OF ROOF -2" TOP OF ROOF -0" TOP OF ROOF 9'-1" T.O.P. -0" TOP OF ROOF Q" TOP OF ROOD -7" TOP OF ROOF -0" TOP OF ROOF 10'-1" T.O.'P 9'-1" T.O.P� 8-6" SOFFIT F.F. 0" F.G. -8�l F. F. 0" F.G.-8- LESS THAN in, 1) TYP. CHIMNEY DETAIL (CRC R903.2) Rev. # Date & Description Job # 2020.02 oI � m N 0 E E uO N U y N M O N (-- U V U) Q : U Co u O - II fl A E N S N N N h N UQ 06 Lo E m C � �a n Il a E O a o m m M � U N (� N O-) (� U O m O L C L N o 4-1 o 0 U O L Z N O a 0 Q i U 06 ti E W � rL V VJ Z O W J W Z Z oQwo W I)f fl w w02 Upr�u) mw u(.7iOaZwZ0--O Uxa_ 22 W ZOm�wo 0 Q �W¢o--Www �O oU)WWCD D <?:w U)Z>aU=Ouu))Ouu))O w �WOww m w w irv�a CO w 0 Date: 05/17/2020 Sheet A300 Now 4&A 100. A i i�►all i 4 AN IMMrrVH4. ■ ye.71<r r.ir5'�,r�r ■ uAY� r,orc'i Arai y.�. F.�r.. srr.. A JAI 4 Q�n a m PAPER BACKED LATH SCRATCH & BROWN COAT MORTAR SETTING BED STONE VENEER PER PLAN 2x WALL W/ INSULATION - WHERE OCCURS FINISH PER PLAN - WHERE OCCURS STONE VENEER TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT CODE SEE ELEVATIONS FOR STONE VENEER PRODUCT NUMBER STONE ATTACHMENT DETAIL ROOF NOTES: 1❑ ROOF ASSEMBLY SHALL BE CLASS "A" MINIMUM PER CRC R901. Q 2" THICK SPRAY APPLIED POLYURETHANE FOAM ROOF BY: NCFI POLYURETHANE ENDURATECH SYSTEM, MODEL #10-011 - 3.0 LB DENSITY SPF & ACRYLIC COATING, ENDURATECH COATING - R 70.012. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. ICC-ES (ESR-3392) l ALL FLASHING AND COUNTER FLASHING AND COPING SHALL BE 26 GA. GALV. SHEET METAL. 4. 26 GA. MINIMUM GALVANIZED VALLEY FLASHING. (CRC 905) l CRICKET El 3" ROOF DRAIN AND 3" OVERFLOW DRAIN ON SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT SYSTEMS OF PIPING. THE DISCHARGE SHALL BE ABOVE GRADE IN A LOCATION OBSERVABLE BY THE BUILDING OCCUPANTS OR MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL. SECONDARY (OVERFLOW) PIPE SYSTEMS SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1101.11.1 OF THE 2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE BASED ON THE RAINFALL RATE FOR WHICH THE PRIMARY SYSTEM IS SIZED. SEE DETAIL 3 / A5.0 ] 26 GA. MINIMUM GALVINIZED ROOF FLASHING. (CRC 903.2) El CHIMNEY CAP - INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS. ] TOP OF PARAPET (T.O.PP.) 10. ROOF DRAINS POINT OF DISCHARGE 11. 6" X 6" SCUPPER TO ALLOW FOR DRAINAGE THROUGH WALL TO ROOF DRAIN 12. ATTIC VENTILATION OPENINGS SHALL BE COVERED WITH CORROSION -RESISTANT METAL MESH WITH 1/16" MINIMUM TO 1/4" MAXIMUM OPENINGS (SECTION R806.1) 13. "BRISTOLITE" EXHAUST / INTAKE PENTHOUSE MODEL #EIP-SF-SR-MF-2222 (288 SQ. IN. EA.) WITH SCREEN OR SIMILAR. ATTIC VENTILATION OPENINGS SHALL BE COVERED WITH CORROSION - RESISTANT METAL MESH OPENINGS OF 1/4 INCH IN DIMENSION. (ICC ES ESR-3177) 14. CONTINUOUS VENT STRIP MANUFACTURED BY: TAMLYN - XTREME TRIM, MODEL: CUV8VW - 18.8 SQ. LIN./FT. NFA ROOF VENTILATION TABULATION NEW ATTIC AREA TO BE VENTILATED: 4,449 SQ.FT. FREE VENTILATING AREA REQUIRED W/ A VAPOR RETARDING BARRIER INSTALLED: 1/150th OF 2,566 S.F= 29.66 S.F. OR 4,271 S.I. REQUIRED (6) "BRISTOLITE" EXHAUST / INTAKE PENTHOUSE MODEL #EIP-SF-SR-MF-2222 (288 SQ. IN. EA.) WITH SCREEN. TOTAL VENTILATION PROVIDED = 1,728 S.I. (167'-6" LINEAR FT.) 4" CONTINUOUS VENT STRIP (18.8 SQ. IN. LIN./FT.) WITH SCREEN. M-1k'L11:71 -Z� aIq� el:181:0�IrE.l S.A.S.M. LAP 6" M UNDERLAYMENT WRAP UNDERLAI RIDGE / HIP NAILE ROOF SHEATHIN( ROOFING UNDER CONC. ROOF TILE TRUSSES -SEE STRUCTURALDVA RIDGE BLOCKING STRUCTURALD" 3 ) DETAIL TYP. CONC. ROOF TILE S.A.S.M. SET RAKE TILE LAPS IN MORTAR, TYP. 2X NAILERS TYP. CONC. ROOF TILE, CUT AS SHOWN — FLASHING ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT 3/8" PLASTER BROWN COAT OVER FOAM CORNICE. ATTACH PER MANUFACTURERS SPECS. — ROOF FRAMING - SEE STRUCTURAL 2X FLAT OUTRIGGER, - SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS. 2 ) DETAIL TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. - SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS CONC. ROOF TILES ROOFING UNDERLAYMENT 2 LAYERS ROOFING FELT TYP. PLYWD. ROOF SHEATHING CONC. TILE BIRDSTOP� r STARTER CONC. ROOF TILE — &T.O. PUT 3/8" PLASTER N BROWN COAT OVER FOAM O CORNICE. ATTACH PER MANUF.SPECS. _ 7/8" CEMENT PLASTER SCRATCH AND BROWN COAT PLYWD. SHEATHING - SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 1 ) DETAIL 1'-0" TYP. EAVE OVERHANG 91 LAP .A.S.M. 12' INIMUM OVE ROOF Rev. # Date & Description Job # 2020.02 ai z m ltl�� 0 N0 o E E N U 0 N M O (9 Co ) i C � Q 'o U p � u a) O_ v u E E"O a) a) UQ gp N �ll aLf E .0m U .. m u� w 'm n ) 11 2 E a O :2o N 0 U ^U) W (� N � U (� 1 (a N L L N C �_°o(� 0 O U �- co L Z 0 O a) Q U 06 tii 0 ti E W rL V Z J H 0 O^' I r z z = w0=O W of U) w a0¢000QZOwZ mwo�� ml (Dzw>- Z 0 0xo_- 0 —F m mow �ofQa-wwV~~O JZOU)� _o O w w z>a0=0U))0U))0 Of Co Q Y Z 0 a 3 w of 0ofw w w of � U) X 0 Date: 05/17/2020 Sheet A400 Colors & Materials Board For Spates Residence 77-739 Mountain View Palm Desert, CA Exterior Primary Paint By: Benjamin Moore - Color- Dove White PM-1 � Window & Door Frames: Color: Dark Bronze Exterior Trim Secondary Paint: (Foam Trim, Garag( & Doors Accent Color) By: Sherwin Williams Color: Urbane Bronze SW 7948 Roof Tile: By: Eagle Roofing 3687 Profile: Capistrano Color Blend: Brown Grey Range Stone Veneer: By: Eldorad❑ Stone Type: Mountain Ledge ML0056PB Color: Sierra Rios Designs, LLC 75-175 Merle Dr., Suite 200 Palm Desert, Ca 92211 (760) 485-7431 CITY OF PALM DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner Date: May 26, 2020 Subject: MISC 19-0030 – Façade Modification – Palms to Pines Center 72- 655 Highway 111 to 72-695 Highway 111 Project Summary The project is a request to modify the façade of the existing Palms to Pines shopping center located between Highway 111 and El Paseo. The proposal also includes landscaping modifications which will remove all existing turf along the property’s Highway 111 and El Paseo frontages and replace it with desert native plant species. The façade modification will focus on the multi-tenant building located towards the central, southern portion of the site. The building is currently anchored by Smart and Final and several independent restaurants. The existing architecture is characterized by Spanish inspired sloped terra-cotta roofs, tan stucco, and a long- horizontal form with multiple breaks in the building mass. Changes to the building include: • Repainting of the entire exterior • Addition of a cornice to the parapet • Expansion of the tenant’s fascia band to allow for larger wall signage • Expansion of the main entry façade for Smart and Final The modifications to the pad building shown on the site plan are not under the scope of this proposal and will occur at a future time. Zoning Ordinance Summary Architectural Review Commission (ARC) approval is required for all commercial façade modifications per Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.68.020 (A). Findings for ARC decisions are listed under PDMC Section 25.68.040 – Findings of the ARC. MISC 19-0030 Page 2 of 2 May 26, 2020 Staff Recommendation Staff is supportive of the overall changes and recommends the ARC approve the proposed building modifications. As a part of the motion for approval, staff recommends the ARC work with staff to revise the landscape plan to provide shade trees throughout the parking area and to replace trees which have been damaged or removed over the years. Attachment: Project Plans DESIGN REVIEW PACKAGE HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CA 03-11-2020 HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 LOCATION MAP 01SCALE: NTS SHOPS 1 SHOPS 2 EL PASEOMAJOR HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 ALTA SURVEY 02SCALE: NTS HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 ALTA SURVEY 03SCALE: 1” = 50’ HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 MAJOR & SHOPS BEFORE AND AFTER 04 BEFORE AFTER KEYPLAN HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 MAJOR & SHOPS BEFORE AND AFTER 05 BEFORE AFTER KEYPLAN HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 MAJOR & SHOPS BEFORE AND AFTER 06 BEFORE AFTER KEYPLAN HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 MAJOR & SHOPS BEFORE AND AFTER 07 BEFORE AFTER KEYPLAN HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 MAJOR & SHOPS BEFORE AND AFTER 08 BEFORE AFTER KEYPLAN HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 MAJOR & SHOPS BEFORE AND AFTER 09 BEFORE AFTER KEYPLAN HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 MAJOR & SHOPS BEFORE AND AFTER 10 BEFORE AFTER KEYPLAN HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 8' 0"3' 0"1' 0" MAJOR & SHOPS ELEVATION NORTH 11 SCALE: 1/8”=1’-0” ELEVATION NORTH - COMPLETE ELEVATION NORTH - PART 1 ELEVATION NORTH - PART 2 +/- 8' 0"+/- 3' 0"+/- 1' 0" +/-3' 0"+/-11' 0"6' 0"11' 0"28' 0"+/- 8' 0"+/- 3' 0"+/- 1' 0" +/-3' 0"+/-11' 0"6' 0"11' 0"28' 0"+/- 8' 0"+/- 3' 0"+/- 1' 0"+/-3' 0"+/-11' 0"6' 0"11' 0"28' 0"8' 0"3' 0"1' 0" I 2 C - E 1 A 1 N 2 B 1 L 28' 0"3' 0"1' 0" MATERIAL LEGEND FINISHES LEGEND I J K L M N A B C D E F E G H 1 2 3 4 (E) WALL (N) PAINT (N) WALL (E) STOREFRONT TO REMAIN (N) STOREFRONT (E) ROOF PARAPET (N) PAINT (N) PARAPET EXTENSION (E) LIGHT (N) WALL SCONCE (N) RAILING (N) CORNICE/ TRIM (N) SIGNAGE BY TENANT (N) DECORATIVE TILE (N) SIGN BAND EXTENSION (E) COLUMN (N) PAINT (E) FASCIA (N) PAINT SW 7757 HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE BY: SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 6084 MODEST WHITE BY: SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7069 IRON ORE BY: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #40 DARK BRONZE BY: KAWNEER PART 1 PART 2 Existing angled pop-out to remain, typ. Existing Column to remain, typ. +/- 23’-1” +/- 28’-0” +/- 23’-1” +/- 16’-4” +/- 26’-3” +/- 11’-0” +/- 8’-0” +/- 16’-6” +/- 16’-4” +/- 26’-3” +/- 11’-0” +/- 8’-0” Existing sign band to be extended, typ. Existing roof to remain. Existing Column to be refaced, typ. H 4 A 1 E - K - G - C - F 1 I 2J - HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 MAJOR & SHOPS ELEVATIONS EAST AND WEST 12 SCALE: 1/8”=1’-0” ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION WEST8' 0"3' 0"+/- 3' 0"+/- 8' 0"+/- 3' 0"+/- 8' 0"+/- 3' 0"+/- 8' 0"+/- 3' 0"+/- 8' 0"+/- 3' 0"+/- 8' 0"+/- 3' 0"+/- 8' 0"+16’-3” +16’-4” MATERIAL LEGEND FINISHES LEGEND I J K L M N A B C D E F E G H 1 2 3 4 (E) WALL (N) PAINT (N) WALL (E) STOREFRONT TO REMAIN (N) STOREFRONT (E) ROOF PARAPET (N) PAINT (N) PARAPET EXTENSION (E) LIGHT (N) WALL SCONCE (N) RAILING (N) CORNICE/ TRIM (N) SIGNAGE BY TENANT (N) DECORATIVE TILE (N) SIGN BAND EXTENSION (E) COLUMN (N) PAINT (E) FASCIA (N) PAINT SW 7757 HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE BY: SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 6084 MODEST WHITE BY: SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7069 IRON ORE BY: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #40 DARK BRONZE BY: KAWNEER8' 0"3' 0"8' 0"3' 0"8' 0"3' 0"8' 0"3' 0"+/-10’-6” +/-8’-6” +/-16’-4” +16’-4” C - N 2 L 1 A 1 J - F 1 H 3 I 2 Existing angled pop-out to remain, typ. Existing roof to remain, typ. C - I 2 A 1 H 3 E 1 M 1 N 2 Existing angled pop-out to remain, typ. Existing Column to remain, typ. HWY 111 & EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CAJOB NUMBER: 18320 DATE: 03-11-2020 COLOR BOARD 13 SW 7757 HIGH REFLECTIVE WHITE BY: SHERWIN WILLIAMS #40 DARK BRONZE BY: KAWNEER SW 6084 MODEST WHITE BY: SHERWIN WILLIAMS PALMS TO PINES SHOPPING CENTER PALM DESERT I CA WOOD INVESTMENTS COMPANIES 119-103 DATE 08 121 119 PLANT SCHEDULE TREES BOTANICAL NAME CERCIDIUM X'DESERT MUSEUM' CHAMAEROPS HUMILIS EXISTING TREE WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA PROTECT IN PLACE WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA REPLANT EXISTING PALM FROM FUTURE PLAZA AREA COMMON NAME THORNLESS PALO VERDE MEDITERRANEAN FAN PALM PROTECT IN PLACE CALIFORNIA FAN PALM M EXICAN FAN PALM SIZE WUCOLS QTY 24" BOX L 1 EXISTING 1 EXISTING 50 EXISTING 3 EXISTING 1 WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA MEXICAN FAN PALM EXISTING PROTECT IN PLACE SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE — ACACIA REDOLENS'DESERT CARPET TM BANK CATCLAW 5 GAL 4) AGAVE AMERICANA CENTURY PLANT 5 GAL AGAVE AMERICANA'MARGINATA' VARIEGATED CENTURY PLANT 5 GAL AGAVE DESMETTIANA DWARF CENTURY PLANT 5 GAL ALOE BARBADENSIS BARBADOS ALOE 1 GAL BOUGAINVILLEAX'BARBARA KARST BARBARA KARST BOUGAINVILLEA 15 GAL ESPALIER BOUGAINVILLEA X'OO-LA-LA' TM OO-LA-LA BOUGAINVILLEA 5 GAL BOUGAINVILLEAX'TORCH GLOW TORCH GLOW BUSH BOUGAINVILLEA 5 GAL CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA RED BIRD OF PARADISE 5 GAL CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS'LITTLE JOHN' DWARF WEEPING BOTTLEBRUSH 5 GAL r . L' CARISSA MACROCARPA'GREEN CARPET' GREEN CARPET NATAL PLUM 5 GAL CEREUS PERUVIANUS PERUVIAN APPLE CACTUS 1 GAL DALEA FRUTESCENS'SIERRA NEGRA' TM BLACK PRAIRIE CLOVER 5 GAL DASYLIRION WHEELERI GREY DESERT SPOON 5 GAL ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 5 GAL HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA'BRAKELIGHTS' TM BRAKELIGHTS RED YUCCA 5 GAL �1 LANTANA CAMARA'NEW GOLD' NEW GOLD LANTANA 5 GAL LEUCOPHYLLUM CANDIDUM'THUNDER CLOUD' TM BREWSTER COUNTY BAROMETERBUSH 5 GAL RUSSELIA EQUISETIFORMIS FIRECRACKER PLANT 5 GAL TECOMA STAINS YELLOW BELLS 5 GAL YUCCA ROSTRATA BEAKED YUCCA 5 GAL YUCCA WHIPPLEI CHAPARRAL YUCCA 5 GAL 41 WUCOLS QTY L 12 L 4 L 2 L 21 L 11 M 13 M 32 M 17 L 14 M 41 M 65 L 7 L 6 L 8 L 46 L 61 M 40 L 8 M 15 M 27 L 10 L 4 1 "=40'-0"SCALE NORTH 0 40 80 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN I L-1 A "Wj w URBAN ARENA CITY OF PALM DESERT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Assistant Planner Date: May 26, 2020 Subject: PP 19-0006 – Single-Story Duplex 73-271 San Nicholas Way Project Summary The project is a Precise Plan application to construct a 3,452-square-foot single-story residential duplex on a vacant lot at 73-271 San Nicholas Way. The architecture is characterized by complex roof structure at a maximum height of 25’ and exterior materials consisting of stucco siding and asphalt roof shingles. The front yard features landscaping and two (2) side-entry carport structures setback 16’ from the curb face; the reduced setback for the carport structure will require a setback reduction granted by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) based on design merit. This item previously appeared at the October 22, 2019 meeting. The ARC raised design comments on the roof form, compatibility of the contemporary style carport with the traditional character of the main home, code issues with the floor plan and general articulation. The applicant has re-designed the roof by adding additional gables stacked upon the primary roof form, which has added to the total height of the structure. The contemporary flat roof carports have been replaced with shed roof carports, which mimic the pitches used on the main home. The bedrooms, which did not meet building code egress requirements, have been removed from the floor plan. Zoning Ordinance Summary This project is required to receive design review approval by the ARC prior proceeding to Planning Commission in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.68.020. Required findings for the ARC are contained in PDMC Section 25.68.040. Staff Recommendation Provide direction to the applicant for the design of the roof, street facing façade, carport structures and front yard landscaping. Attachment: Elevations I I Y 0 1 P I I A D [ 5 1 R i I October 22, 2019) ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOTICE OF ACTION CASE NO: PP 19-0006 APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Kola Olatunbosun, 73360 Catalina Way, Palm Desert, California 92260 NATURE OF PROJECTIAPPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a design for a new singe -story residential duplex. LOCATION: 73721 San Nicholas Way ZONE: R-2 Upon reviewing the plans and presentations submitted by staff, and by the applicant, the Architectural Review Commission continued Case No. PP 19-0006 subject to allowing applicant to address concerns regarding compliance with Building Code, building articulation, and compatibility of carport structure with home design (materials, forms, color). Date of Action: October 22, 2018 Vote: Motion carried 7-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision, Any amendments to this approved plan would need to be re -submitted to Commission for approval.) STAFF COMMENTS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the Architectural Review Commission to the Department of Building and Safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meeting's agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday eight days prior to the next meeting. OLAT GENERAL BUILDING COMPANY LLC 73360 CATALINA WAY, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 May 6, 2020 Ryan Stendell Director of Community Development, City of Palm desert 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260-2578 SUBJECT: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMSSION MEETING NOTES FOR CASE No. PP-19-0006 The Olat General Building Co. LLC received a letter from the City of Palm Desert Architectural Review Committee (ARC), following the review of plans and presentations submitted at the October 22, 2019 meeting raised the following concerns. We have addressed those concerns and incorporated them in our new drawings. Below are such concerns and their corresponding addresses. (copy from the city attached). 1.ARC's CONCERN: Location of interior bedrooms. Interior bedrooms have no windows nor egress. OUR RESPONSE: The two interior bedrooms have been eliminated from the drawings. 2.ARC's CONCERN: Carports and the building bare no relationship. OUR RESPONSE: The building and the Carport have been re -designed to reflect such relationship. 3. ARC'S CONCERN: Roof looks like a giant blob. Needs upgrade similar to the standard in the preceding presentation. OUR RESPONSE: The roof structure has been upgraded and re- designed. OLAT GENERAL BUILDING COMPANY LLC 73360 CATALINA WAY, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 If you have any questions, please contact me at kola.olatunbosul2@gmail.com or at (760) 898-1007. I" Kola Olatunbosun CD 0Lu F H HIM, ®z Z ll `fib �� 8 a F qua 1g G �H3 3n4aE,ou° �Q $Rx 6 �8. oi°re arsv ® •Aab3lNon �� � ��Sm �$� a � i�,_ a�« ���&�. ��- 8 � �� 4 OR =2 'L. mi g E mA E9 BM. U dagg � a g Q�SkE �n s� �gab� eye �� ilk 2rg,1 = A3 �NM4L y Su 5 x W 9' c p 3 p H� ° 1 il .• 'i g&i Hill Z °°-a�'gOa r I�¢ amp .Y"5�nS` gQc�gq� gib 'y�g Eg °E "" �' aSQL 3E c? FH B"o3aaB M FLS m'i n`93 3 m V$d �B -p U J 4� V FJJgq OJUom L� mq�iq Jq�N mJg34N � •0�e0pq�4�� Q Q 1' 2F GGD2F N�n�uni .Q 22 Fm.Q m ac W qW Fyryy�l� W Uq W zo�o- W>Fm� Qfx`22jji FmzW �5-H Y,K% O Ua U'FCl d`z,. Ow 2. z4 Fo� g q Fmo�a: rcwmZ. ¢zOz Z q0 wp x Otia 00x, OOnLLU -, ag4'�dX�a7aa'r x KKK C —GE V a w - o O � � � W O W U U 5Z W a o V 7 0 a 5 y �N 0 Q N V V ic u 2 zi U Z ul O1 it co) tiaQ1-1, d3 E w W r m ypR y�Q i iR o m uF WW U tiL Y 4q �w w m� u 4❑ co a°o F`U zy O y0o uz �Joa qq � O uJ. au0 q 4 �o OOW SO¢'i J¢LL z a0z qF oc F�0 �¢0Fa 3=z o Fowe d. g U2y0WU q=wm- yrr Wo u=wz2 ,A - g 2 y 4 N W 45 �F 9 W' q 8, Cwl N W q7 z WWg Zp WZ� �S7�y J 0 U' OF DUM q ga�FW gow<o Vu Q¢waJD gw2��f Lu m m w01 m W Z W c�LLa$=y 4 i U w 0 mU O� Sq 0 � Uki 4 U U Z Z W > > W a a a a W W Z U U U V W W 3 a Q. a a 0 0 o U U g g Q. LU F � a y W 0 0 p u U p 0 4 y Q a a m -co-- 0 0 K 0 n a a 0 V W U w O z�.+ o �U� 61 -a Qa Z � Z Z UJ Y 3 a& o ° t � \ 0 w o , / U T Q O ti O M .t s g 0 Ja [7 Y O' V } eH F JN m W ¢¢¢ S i C y w gy T x i co ui O �— w O g 0 ti w g Lu r w J r= 0 ❑ D oJgm m Z �qJj w Jq m o o Y b rg� V ql N J= m0 V O U a = F fL Z 2 Z 0 g _ f II S 4~4 � ¢ C9 2 O - - v'\ \J m W z 0 LL, r G r N ; B § §� 01 k ` §0 0 %( uO \ §§ r> ! © . | k \ < © \ 0 � C13 \� � o m® > <z $ « � § / \ u � o � w � K o (n U� k / \ � k \ \Lc 2 '■ § k m k c � k § R ECL R K \ E . k z O to uj Q: 2 $ $ a � \ ■ k cn � . m k lid � to :�� y N 8 z C7 Ja FJS a � hZ g, O 6 Z Y J C? 3 w m� a r G d 4¢ II ' II I I I II !I I I I !II! II I I I ! IIIII o�„ I II I I I i j t j jl I I I co m j j it o I I I I o � oao Im I a I I Ili® 0 :MRa LL I I I I II I w o o li, as LU I I IIg0 r �g LLJo I I I o o w °° z 2 I I I! YN- � ��I• a s I I II I I III I I I I ��' o Jo I I •� II I I z z I I II i t a s I iii II f I I III! I ca !I I I I ! II I I I I, I li ii i i 1 Ilfil i ] z k qz e� o ! n § §OM q� 2 § {A ` Gk 2 ® � COO (j 7 § ± \ f IL\) (2 } k k Q C k Q R 2 Q ROE Q � w � (10 -q ca ct LL \ � ca \ M - / 2 � % k � � / ( � § E L a \ / f � \ k E \ I / k «( Uiv uj % '7 � / ® . d § J - '% w k c R Q f 2 § \ k % \ ■ k $ \ * ® m 6 cr QC \ k \ � § o u o o co \ \ \ ■ a. CK ��� / a a ; B | E / o� e� § ; ■ ` § b o /� ) 7 _§ 2§ z 7 £ \ § ^ cow § §2 | k \ | 02 / �II�j� j lfll)I I w R q R w % § $ R � � / � SIC � � q Cr§ \ § \ \ \� \ \ LLI�E \ % � j I III .q w . 4 CL CL \ �II� » e �\ % § Lj w J ' 3 \ R Q E w G. II I \�� § � z / \ IIIHI I « co � k � � % \ II)I �I\I ■ % � I \K ■ � I II<), � � II Imo\ d o / •/ I :im \ \ \ �' » m z ■ a \ E �� \ IIII§( I u W z �a zs a gpm E m m N o $ . Q) -jz Z 4 L (V Y Y n k Q mO 5 w H O 0 x W p wa o � I b 6 I b 1 ® I I I b I - I I � i I I I I 4�7 1 - 1 I - I � I I L.----- — —_.._..----------------------------------------------J N U 9 W ir x in a�a• b M zr s ar n I I 0 m — ry b 4 b M 7 b I:j 1 b Ir - 0 i e m s-r r-r ro ei ro e� PT.S• Ps.g I I L� C1 Cl ClIi IYYI I 1 /r I z $ O E> �855 aZ J7 ? LL = O gom E m z 3 R n s o w oz D- 4DmM u� p a 5 = .. .. � 33 pp ------------------------------------------------- CARPORT I I I CARPORT I I 1 I I L--- --- - --- - -- - - --- - ---- - - -- I - - -- - ---- - ---- --- --- J 8 w 2 2 F �5 m Z R o 0 gom — E i0 } g a S t LIL ZI LL I 0 x c~ a q � o'f d 6 I I I I I I I I I t- I I I I i�rweiaturo I I I I I I ra2xaxo� i I I I I .II I I I I a 4 � � w !AatrjjSD m w a a. a U w o AVM omd mn m MULLS IXISTRG T-3/B"00[O aGCRI1sFEUROCK. MUL9ERRYritEE/ O RCl15 TTtff u W r� EL PASEO WAY �$ IOU � AG CRUSHEG ROCK -R last WPARIBWBBRACE. xi,BOXMQD aIEoxv." srewes sreeues CONCRETE CrUENr AS CRUSHED ROCK p 3E$g gAF 1. ——42"SCREEYWALL. _ .... 2 $ � d tz g 9 F 6 Sra ul r TREES k A `'k i '- 71-BLLL- 2'COTTAaE-- ---PROPERTYME - - — - - — - - - :-COi7A(x -� '' p-LIE AGOW CACTUS �_SRDP� �'�' � t' i AGORI C4CTUS 6'OC _ 3r14'OAO VERM RO YERDE ROCK LIr L CIPUSHE e AO ROU 1 ROCK F~�eN¢ry SAN NiCMOLAS WAY