Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-05-03 PC Regular Meeting Agenda Packet SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION From:Kevin Swartz To:Monica O"Reilly Cc:Rosie Lua Subject:FW: 44525 Santa Margarita Ave. Date:Tuesday, May 3, 2022 9:43:21 AM Monica, Please forward to the Planning Commission. Kevin Swartz Associate Planner Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6485 kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org -----Original Message----- From: BRIAN BERGSTROM [mailto:brianbergs@aol.com] Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 7:51 PM To: Kevin Swartz <kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org> Subject: 44525 Santa Margarita Ave. Mr. Swartz; I live at 44700 Santa Margarita Ave. A neighbor informed me, over the weekend, that the house at the end of our street is slated for 5 houses with an addition to the existing house with 38 people living in temporary or supportive residence. My understanding is it is for pregnancy support. I was not notified as I believe I’m beyond the 300 ft notice radius. I also was not aware of being rezoned as R-2 in 2017. I think due to the zoning change the 38 residents in 6 houses on one lot is within the zoning allotment. I understand the idea of allowing an ADU or Grandma House. I cannot imagine 38 residents plus staff for a business enterprise with rotating occupants and staffing was imagined by the city planners. It is an abuse of the spirit of the zoning and promises to degrade the neighborhood. If the neighbors take advantage of an opportunity to ‘cash out’ of their homes when the getting is good and others took advantage of the cities leniency, this street could have a hundred people living here. Again, I cannot believe the city had that in mind. The city will not be able to deny any other homeowner to abuse the system in such a way after setting this precedent. I am a Chiropractor here in Palm Desert and have considered doing some small group wellness retreats at my home. I would want to construct a one bedroom ADU to accommodate, along with my home, 6 clients along with me for 2- 3 days at a time. I was hoping I wouldn’t have problems with the city to accommodate 6 people for 3 days. It seems that by comparison to 38 guests it won’t be a problem. I assume ‘Mama’s House’ is a non profit with substantial resources, considering the multi million dollar construction needed. That does not excuse the abuse and assault on the neighborhood. I imagine that this philanthropic endeavor that someone feels a calling to provide to a needy population is a worthy cause with significant heart strings. Starting such a project comes with a lot of effort and support. That is present in the beginning. Some ‘Heart’ projects with all good intentions don’t last. I point out ‘Gilda’s Club’ for Cancer support, gone. Edra Blixseth and Shelter from the Storm, lost the philanthropic support. It happens. What happens to this neighborhood, if and when, ‘Mamas House’ funding runs dry. Who buys such a property in a residential neighborhood. Does the city have input as to who the next residents will be. Short term rental for 38 people at a time. Do I need to say ‘Festival goers’? Can you say no after having said yes to this project? If anyone in planning wants to hear what I have to say, I vote NO. Thank you for listening to my concerns, I appreciate it, and I appreciate you, and I appreciate the city in which I choose to live. Sincerely, Brian Bergstrom, DC 760-861-0727 Sent from my iPad From:Kevin Swartz To:Monica O"Reilly Cc:Rosie Lua Subject:FW: Heartbeat at 22 Case No. PP21-0010 "Supportive Housing Project" Date:Tuesday, May 3, 2022 10:04:06 AM One more letter. Kevin Swartz Associate Planner Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6485 kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org From: Helga Moriarty [mailto:helga_esw@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 12:21 PM To: Kevin Swartz <kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org> Subject: Heartbeat at 22 Case No. PP21-0010 "Supportive Housing Project" Attention: Kevin Swartz, Nick Melloni, Monica O'Reilly, Rosie Lua Hello, My name is Helga Moriarty, I am the owner and resident of 44501 Grand Canyon Lane, in a development called The Grove, in Palm Desert Ca 92260. My residence and entire back yard back up to your proposed project which will negatively impact me. Consequently, I am not in favor of it. This proposed use is not appropriate or compatible in an existing developed neighborhood of single family homes. There will be 5 new residential units accommodating 30 residents total, plus the proposed addition to the existing residence will house 8 more residents, bringing it to a total of 38 residents, a far cry from a single family home. I assume in addition there will be office staff, maintenance staff, visitors, deliveries, service people etc. which will result in quite a bit of traffic up and down the street. The proposed location of the carport will just be 5 feet away from my back yard and the proposed 14' shade structure above it will have a substantial negative impact on me and my neighbors. Also, is there a guarantee that this project planned to house women won't be sold at some point to another Supportive Housing applicant who might house drug rehab patients, mentally disturbed persons, homeless, etc.? I am sure that this project will detract from the neighborhood and negatively impact home values. Sincerely, Helga Moriarty From:N. Boileau To:Monica O"Reilly Cc:nboileau@sbcglobal.net Subject:Letter for packet for planning commission and Mayor Date:Thursday, April 28, 2022 8:32:23 AM Attachments:Boileau to City Planning Commission 4-28-2022.pdf Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. Good Morning Monica! it was a pleasure to meet you yesterday! Thank you for your help in getting this letter in the packets for the meeting and if the Mayor and city council persons don't receive the letter can you please forward? Or should I email them directly? Thanks again! Nanette Nanette E. Boileau Palm Desert, CA From:Kevin Swartz To:Monica O"Reilly Cc:Rosie Lua Subject:FW: 44525 Santa Margarita Ave. Date:Tuesday, May 3, 2022 9:43:21 AM Monica, Please forward to the Planning Commission. Kevin Swartz Associate Planner Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6485 kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org -----Original Message----- From: BRIAN BERGSTROM [mailto:brianbergs@aol.com] Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 7:51 PM To: Kevin Swartz <kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org> Subject: 44525 Santa Margarita Ave. Mr. Swartz; I live at 44700 Santa Margarita Ave. A neighbor informed me, over the weekend, that the house at the end of our street is slated for 5 houses with an addition to the existing house with 38 people living in temporary or supportive residence. My understanding is it is for pregnancy support. I was not notified as I believe I’m beyond the 300 ft notice radius. I also was not aware of being rezoned as R-2 in 2017. I think due to the zoning change the 38 residents in 6 houses on one lot is within the zoning allotment. I understand the idea of allowing an ADU or Grandma House. I cannot imagine 38 residents plus staff for a business enterprise with rotating occupants and staffing was imagined by the city planners. It is an abuse of the spirit of the zoning and promises to degrade the neighborhood. If the neighbors take advantage of an opportunity to ‘cash out’ of their homes when the getting is good and others took advantage of the cities leniency, this street could have a hundred people living here. Again, I cannot believe the city had that in mind. The city will not be able to deny any other homeowner to abuse the system in such a way after setting this precedent. I am a Chiropractor here in Palm Desert and have considered doing some small group wellness retreats at my home. I would want to construct a one bedroom ADU to accommodate, along with my home, 6 clients along with me for 2- 3 days at a time. I was hoping I wouldn’t have problems with the city to accommodate 6 people for 3 days. It seems that by comparison to 38 guests it won’t be a problem. I assume ‘Mama’s House’ is a non profit with substantial resources, considering the multi million dollar construction needed. That does not excuse the abuse and assault on the neighborhood. I imagine that this philanthropic endeavor that someone feels a calling to provide to a needy population is a worthy cause with significant heart strings. Starting such a project comes with a lot of effort and support. That is present in the beginning. Some ‘Heart’ projects with all good intentions don’t last. I point out ‘Gilda’s Club’ for Cancer support, gone. Edra Blixseth and Shelter from the Storm, lost the philanthropic support. It happens. What happens to this neighborhood, if and when, ‘Mamas House’ funding runs dry. Who buys such a property in a residential neighborhood. Does the city have input as to who the next residents will be. Short term rental for 38 people at a time. Do I need to say ‘Festival goers’? Can you say no after having said yes to this project? If anyone in planning wants to hear what I have to say, I vote NO. Thank you for listening to my concerns, I appreciate it, and I appreciate you, and I appreciate the city in which I choose to live. Sincerely, Brian Bergstrom, DC 760-861-0727 Sent from my iPad From:Kevin Swartz To:Monica O"Reilly Cc:Rosie Lua Subject:FW: Heartbeat at 22 Case No. PP21-0010 "Supportive Housing Project" Date:Tuesday, May 3, 2022 10:04:06 AM One more letter. Kevin Swartz Associate Planner Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6485 kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org From: Helga Moriarty [mailto:helga_esw@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 12:21 PM To: Kevin Swartz <kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org> Subject: Heartbeat at 22 Case No. PP21-0010 "Supportive Housing Project" Attention: Kevin Swartz, Nick Melloni, Monica O'Reilly, Rosie Lua Hello, My name is Helga Moriarty, I am the owner and resident of 44501 Grand Canyon Lane, in a development called The Grove, in Palm Desert Ca 92260. My residence and entire back yard back up to your proposed project which will negatively impact me. Consequently, I am not in favor of it. This proposed use is not appropriate or compatible in an existing developed neighborhood of single family homes. There will be 5 new residential units accommodating 30 residents total, plus the proposed addition to the existing residence will house 8 more residents, bringing it to a total of 38 residents, a far cry from a single family home. I assume in addition there will be office staff, maintenance staff, visitors, deliveries, service people etc. which will result in quite a bit of traffic up and down the street. The proposed location of the carport will just be 5 feet away from my back yard and the proposed 14' shade structure above it will have a substantial negative impact on me and my neighbors. Also, is there a guarantee that this project planned to house women won't be sold at some point to another Supportive Housing applicant who might house drug rehab patients, mentally disturbed persons, homeless, etc.? I am sure that this project will detract from the neighborhood and negatively impact home values. Sincerely, Helga Moriarty From:Loran Chick To:Monica O"Reilly; N. Boileau Subject:Re: Letter for packet for planning commission and Mayor Date:Thursday, April 28, 2022 9:32:31 AM Attachments:Letter to City Planning Commission.pdf Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. Monica, Attached is my letter to the Mayor and Planning Commission for Case No. PP 21-0010. Thank you for your help with getting the letter in the packets for the Planning Commission. Thanks. Loran On Thursday, April 28, 2022, 08:32:09 AM PDT, N. Boileau <nboileau@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Good Morning Monica! it was a pleasure to meet you yesterday! Thank you for your help in getting this letter in the packets for the meeting and if the Mayor and city council persons don't receive the letter can you please forward? Or should I email them directly? Thanks again! Nanette Nanette E. Boileau Palm Desert, CA April 27, 2022 Dear Mayor Harnik and Planning Commission members, I am writing to discuss the request in front of the Planning Commission of Case No. PP 21-0010, to change a residential house to include up to 38 residents. This number represents twice as many residents as currently lives on the street which was originally a planned Single Family Residential neighborhood. Changing the zoning laws to make expansive limits based on the size of a lot doesn't mean that we should allow the full capacity for a multifamily residential complex in this type of neighborhood. it wasn't originally planned for that many residents living on one piece of property. It is not an apartment complex and I believe the area doesn't have the infrastructure to support it. There are some questions that I think need to be addressed even to consider this as a viable option. 1. Does the sewer infrastructure have the capacity for this many additional residents for the neighborhood? when this neighborhood was developed, my guess is that the calculations for pipe sizes for the area were much lower capacity then what this residence will add. 2. what about water pressure and capacity? Is CvwD bringing in a larger line to accommodate this many additional residents for this one lot? what about if half of the other properties on Santa Margarita were expanded to add residents to their capacity? 3. I know there will be problems with Emergency vehicles turning around in the cul-de-sac as it is already at a shorter radius. I'm sure they can do a 3 point turn but I'm not sure if that will work with any vehicles in the road. Maybe large occupations of properties like this should be limited on cul-de-sacs since there isn't two-way traffic to allow all types of emergency vehicles to be able to access each location. 4. The number of vehicle parking places planned onsite is 16. I'm not sure how many will need to be handicapped accessible but for 38 residents that won't be enough parking spaces. I know they say that most residents won't be allowed to have vehicles but what if they change their rules after it is approved? For 38 residents using California averages, that would mean 28 vehicles would be in this one residence. I know I don't want cars parked on the street in front of my house and I'm only one lot away. 5. what if this organization closes up after a few years and someone else makes it an apartment complex? Then you will have an even bigger problem. You can say you will address it through rules and laws but I think you are opening up a Pandora's box by allowing this size of a shelter at this location in what should still be a single family residential neighborhood. I am against the overcrowding of an original Palm Desert Single Family Residential neighborhood. I feel it will hurt my property values and make living on Santa Margarita Avenue stressful and too busy. Cul-de-sacs were traditionally created to make less traffic and congestion in a neighborhood and to promote family living. I also believe that the City of Palm Desert should take responsibility to update infrastructure if this is allowed at the current request of a capacity of 38 residents. This most likely needs to be done even with the addition of a smaller number of residents. if only 20 residents are allowed, I would still question whether the water and sewer are at capacity for the street and the idea of packing a large number of residents at the end of a cul-de-sac where access by emergency vehicles is difficult at best. Please take these questions and comments into consideration when a decision is being made on this case. z will be on the zoom meeting to answer any questions that you may have on my thoughts on this matter. Thank you. Loran Chick 44545 Santa Margarita Avenue From:N. Boileau To:Monica O"Reilly Cc:Martin Alvarez; Richard Cannone; Rosie Lua; Kevin Swartz; Christine Aleman Subject:Re: Letter for packet for planning commission and Mayor Date:Thursday, April 28, 2022 9:19:36 AM Hi! Christine Aleman has your information and will be bringing up the petition by noon. We are also trying to put together a list of those who want to speak by the morning of the meeting. Nanette Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2022, at 8:51 AM, Monica O'Reilly <moreilly@cityofpalmdesert.org> wrote:  Good morning Ms. Boileau, It was also a pleasure meeting you yesterday. I have received your letter and will include it in the agenda packet and email it to the City Council. Yesterday, you mentioned that there would also be a petition. Will the petition be emailed to me before noon? Monica O'Reilly Management Specialist II Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6484 moreilly@cityofpalmdesert.org From: N. Boileau <nboileau@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 8:31 AM To: Monica O'Reilly <moreilly@cityofpalmdesert.org> Cc: nboileau@sbcglobal.net Subject: Letter for packet for planning commission and Mayor Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. Good Morning Monica! it was a pleasure to meet you yesterday! Thank you for your help in getting this letter in the packets for the meeting and if the Mayor and city council persons don't receive the letter can you please forward? Or should I email them directly? Thanks again! Nanette Nanette E. Boileau Palm Desert, CA Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, City of Palm Desert Opposition to Presently Proposed Site Plan for HEARTbeat at 22 on Santa Margarita Avenue The below signed Palm Desert residents present the following items in opposition to the presently proposed site development plan for HEARTbeat at 22 on Santa Margarita Avenue in Palm Desert. • Residents do not oppose HEARTbeat at 22's mission, goals or program in any manner • Opposition is merely to the density of proposed housing units in the plan as well as traffic congestion, streetside parking volume, and changing the quiet character of the cul-de-sac neighborhood. This opposition is even more concerning should the property at a future date become general housing wherein as many as thirty-six residents and automobiles may be on - site and, with visitors, hosting as many as 40 or 50 automobiles. • We recognize the planned site development is code compliant, but we ask for site plan revision to include fewer and/or smaller units; 2 or 3 of the proposed 3 (or2) bedroom casita units rather than the planned five units (15 beds). • In conclusion, we welcome the diversity, mission, and vitality which HEARTbeat at 22 brings to the neighborhood, community, and overall city; but respectfully request site plan be revised to accommodate a maximum of 10 or 12 beds. Printed Name O Printed Name C� i yn„ W(�.l l\ S l.�Y�g lanr� 1/V �1�16j Printed Name Signature Address `1 Zg0 S,ti�q ihez AJ! P�\'n t>25 Address ec1 CA 112,6o ��^535S��ic I11a wfarC��, Pales, b,'sPv4i C'14- R�zf,9 Address of; iy )` �'p I A N K/I �/o � �t c {,-� �SO SA 4A VOIZGAMA A� Printed Name Signature Address b`'5` U� , (r Additional Names may be on accompanying sheet %AL/ Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, City of Palm Desert Opposition to Presently Proposed Site Plan for HEARTbeat at 22 on Santa Margarita Avenue The below signed Palm Desert residents present the following items in opposition to the presently proposed site development plan for HEARTbeat at 22 on Santa Margarita Avenue in Palm Desert. • Residents do not oppose HEARTbeat at 22's mission, goals or program in any manner • Opposition is merely to the density of proposed housing units in the plan as well as traffic congestion, streetside parking volume, and changing the quiet character of the cul-de-sac neighborhood. This opposition is even more concerning should the property at a future date become general housing wherein as many as thirty-six residents and automobiles may be on - site and, with visitors, hosting as many as 40 or 50 automobiles. • We recognize the planned site development is code compliant, but we ask for site plan revision to include fewer and/or smaller units; 2 or 3 of the proposed 3 (or2) bedroom casita units rather than the planned five units (15 beds). • In conclusion, we welcome the diversity, mission, and vitality which HEARTbeat at 22 brings to the neighborhood, community, and overall city; but respectfully request site plan be revised to accommodate a maximum of 10 or 12 beds. cid T, �D,c¢ �� hrink7teed�a/m/e6a Signature Address I' • ) FER t/ ,(I 41 Printed Name Signature Address eif, 6A 9zzc�o a�1�2 2 In� (� �I �� - ��1nQ 4 Printed Name Signature Address la Qibh­t r4f;(4. 7yZgb De,4mei Wa in, ,��, P/M ate,/ ('4 v-1t p Printed Name Signature Address Additional Names may be on accompanying sheet Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, City of Palm Desert Opposition to Presently Proposed Site Plan for HEARTbeat at 22 on Santa Margarita Avenue The below signed Palm Desert residents present the following items in opposition to the presently proposed site development plan for HEARTbeat at 22 on Santa Margarita Avenue in Palm Desert. • Residents do not oppose HEARTbeat at 22's mission, goals or program in any manner • Opposition is merely to the density of proposed housing units in the plan as well as traffic congestion, streetside parking volume, and changing the quiet character of the cul-de-sac neighborhood. This opposition is even more concerning should the property at a future date become general housing wherein as many as thirty-six residents and automobiles may be on - site and, with visitors, hosting as many as 40 or 50 automobiles. • We recognize the planned site development is code compliant, but we ask for site plan revision to include fewer and/or smaller units; 2 or 3 of the proposed 3 (or2) bedroom casita units rather than the planned five units (15 beds). • In conclusion, we welcome the diversity, mission, and vitality which HEARTbeat at 22 brings to the neighborhood, community, and overall city; but respectfully request site plan be revised to accommodate a maximum of 10 or 12 beds. Printed Name Signature Address Printed Name / Signatur Address ry Coo �f4 � 5 Sam Morgarct "WALl" � pe�A -1436->o DEAVLA VVA Printed a e Signature Add eii' 0&"'"Lv'ft 9Z fIi N TE�Z 7`f'3Go j��Aa2aNr�y �?{� WILL �P� �`16 /ScS -� art bL Ave Printed Name Signature Address / C/�` Additional Names may be on accompanying sheet R Z 26 D Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, City of Palm Desert Opposition to Presently Proposed Site Plan for HEARTbeat at 22 on Santa Margarita Avenue The below signed Palm Desert residents present the following items in opposition to the presently proposed site development plan for HEARTbeat at 22 on Santa Margarita Avenue in Palm Desert. • Residents do not oppose HEARTbeat at 22's mission, goals or program in any manner • Opposition is merely to the density of proposed housing units in the plan as well as traffic congestion, streetside parking volume, and changing the quiet character of the cul-de-sac neighborhood. This opposition is even more concerning should the property at a future date become general housing wherein as many as thirty-six residents and automobiles may be on - site and, with visitors, hosting as many as 40 or 50 automobiles. • We recognize the planned site development is code compliant, but we ask for site plan revision to include fewer and/or smaller units; 2 or 3 of the proposed 3 (or2) bedroom casita units rather than the planned five units (15 beds). • In conclusion, we welcome the diversity, mission, and vitality which HEARTbeat at 22 brings to the neighborhood, community, and overall city; but respectfully request site plan be revised to accommodate a maximum of 10 or 12 beds. Printed Name Printed Name K-4l((b X P AU � �Z Printed Name Sig ture , Add6ss 1� 3 jZ&A A fi Signature d Address N ('M Ick mar TZ^ I)C-XR7- CA fi6 0 Printed Name Signature Address Additional Names may be on accompanying sheet Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner, City of Palm Desert Opposition to Presently Proposed Site Plan for HEARTbeat at 22 on Santa Margarita Avenue The below signed Palm Desert residents present the following items in opposition to the presently proposed site development plan for HEARTbeat at 22 on Santa Margarita Avenue in Palm Desert. • Residents do not oppose HEARTbeat at 22's mission, goals or program in any manrier • Opposition is merely to the density of proposed housing units in the plan as well as traffic congestion j Mreetside parking volume, and changing the quiet character of the cul-de-sac neighborhood. This opposition is even more concerning should the property at a future date -become general housing wherein as many as thirty-six residents and automobiles may be on - site and, with visitors, hosting as many as 40 or 50 automobiles. • We recognize the planned site development is code compliant, but we ask for site plan revision to include fewer and/or smaller units; 2 or 3 of the proposed 3 (or2) bedroom casita units rather than the planned five units (15 beds). • In conclusion, we welcome the diversity, mission, and vitality which HEARTbeat at 22 brings to the neighborhood, community, and overall city; but respectfully request site plan be revised to accommodate a maximum of 10 or 12 beds. Printed Name Printed Name 0 V iIio off' CS-" c Printed Name ( ), oe�� ��bety Signature Address Ay-e- Inature Address • 0 Signature Address Printed Name Signature Address Additional Names may be on accompanying sheet ,.. �,. .� i�,� r ,.,,i;);. . �'vltStY d r d