Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-09-13 ARC Regular Meeting Agenda Packet City of Palm Desert Page 1 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA AGENDA Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. • To participate via Zoom, use the following link: https://palmdesert.zoom.us/j/83648797515, Zoom Webinar ID: 836 4879 7515. • To participate by telephone call (213) 338-8477 or (669) 219-2599, Zoom Webinar ID: 836 4879 7515. To provide a public comment please press *9 to raise your hand. • Written public comment may also be submitted to planning@cityofpalmdesert.org. Emails received by 9:30 a.m. prior to the meeting will be distributed to the Commission. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Commission as soon as practicable and retained for the official record. Emails will not be read aloud except as an ADA accommodation. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. OATH OF OFFICE 3. ROLL CALL 4. NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: This time has been set aside for the public to address the Architectural Review Commission on issues that are not on the agenda for up to three minutes. Because the Brown Act does not allow the Commission to act on items not listed on the agenda, members may briefly respond or refer the matter to staff for a report and recommendation at a future meeting. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. The public may comment on any items on the Consent Agenda within the three-minute time limit. Individual items may be removed by Commissioners for a separate discussion. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Architectural Review Commission Regular Meeting minutes of August 23, 2022. Tuesday September 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Architectural Review Commission Agenda September 13, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Architectural Review Commission Special Meeting minutes of August 30, 2022. CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER: Items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion will be considered at this time. 6. ACTION CALENDAR A. FINAL DRAWINGS 1. CASE NO: MISC 22-0014 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a wall setback exception to the City of Palm Desert Fence and Wall Ordinance for a five-foot tall decorative block wall with breeze block accents at a setback of twelve feet from the face of curb. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Stacey Harding, Palm Desert, CA 92260 LOCATION: 45420 Abronia Trail ZONE: Multifamily Residential (R-3) RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC approves the proposed wall exception based on staff’s analysis of the required findings for this exception. 2. Modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as a conditions of approval. 2. CASE NO: PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of an amendment to PP21-0009 revising the exterior architecture for the 330-unit multi-family residential community on a 15-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and extension of Technology Drive. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Apogee Professional Services, Omaha, NE, 68144 LOCATION: NE Corner of Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive ZONE: Millennium Specific Plan Area 7, Planned Residential (PR)-22 RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC determines that the requirements of the Findings have been met based on the analysis and approves the case with modifications. 2. The area between upper and lower story windows shall be recessed a minimum of 3” from the fascia. 3. Awnings shall be provided over the second and third story residential windows for all street facing elevations as shown on the original approval. 4. Any modifications required by the ARC should be added as conditions of approval. Architectural Review Commission Agenda September 13, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 3 3. CASE NOS: PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of an Amendment No. 2 to the DSRT SURF project (PP18-0009 and SP/PP21-0002), adding 45 hotel rooms including revisions to the interior layout and exterior architecture of the hotel and surf center facility located at the 17.69-acre site within Desert Willow Golf Resort. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Desert Wave Ventures, PO Box 147, Solano Beach, CA 92075 LOCATION: Vacant 17.69-acre site within Desert Willow ZONE: Planned Residential (PR)-5 RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC determines that the requirements of the Findings have been met based on the analysis and approves the request. 2. Modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval. B. MISCELLANEOUS 1. CASE NO: CUP 22-0001 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to construct an unmanned, 65’-0” tall wireless telecommunication facility stealth monopalm within a 562- square-foot lease area, a block wall enclosure containing ground-mounted equipment, and new landscaping located at 39750 Garand Lane (APN 626-410-046). APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Smartlink Group for AT&T, Newport Beach, CA 92660 LOCATION: 39750 Garand Lane ZONE: SI - Service Industrial, FCOZ - Freeway Commercial Overlay Zone RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on the analysis and approves the request with modifications as a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission. 2. The applicant shall increase the height of the wall enclosure to a minimum of 8’- 0”. 3. Modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as a conditions of approval. 7. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONERS B. CITY STAFF C. ATTENDANCE REPORT Architectural Review Commission Agenda September 13, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 4 8. ADJOURNMENT: The next Regular Meeting will be held on September 27, 2022, at 12:30 p.m. Architectural Review Commission Agenda September 13, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 5 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda for the Architectural Review Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and City website not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Melinda Gonzalez Recording Secretary PUBLIC NOTICES Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Development Services Department, City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda items and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.cityofpalmdesert.org. Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the city will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. CITY OF PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION PRELIMINARY MINUTES TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2022 – 12:30 P.M. ZOOM VIRTUAL MEETING CITY OF PALM DESERT, CA I. CALL TO ORDER Planning Manager, Rosie Lua called the meeting to order at 12:36 p.m. II. OATH OF OFFICE City Clerk, Anthony Mejia, swore in newly appointed commissioner, Dean Wallace Colvard. III. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present Absent Dean Wallace Colvard X Nicholas Latkovic (Left meeting at 1:59 p.m.) X Michael McAuliffe X Jim McIntosh X John Vuksic X Also Present: Chris Escobedo, Assistant City Manager/Director of Development Services Richard Cannone, Deputy Director of Development Services Anthony Mejia, City Clerk Rosie Lua, Planning Manager Nick Melloni, Senior Planner Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner Randy Chavez, Community Services Manager Shawn Muir, Management Analyst Melinda Gonzalez, Recording Secretary IV. APPOINTMENTS A. SELECTION of a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson. Planning Manager Lua advised selection of a Chair and Vice Chair would be through nomination by Commissioners. PRELIMINARY MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 2022 2 Commissioner McIntosh moved to appoint Commissioner Vuksic as ARC Chair. The motion was seconded by Commissioner McAuliffe and carried by a 5-0 vote. (AYES: Colvard, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None). Commissioner Vuksic moved to appoint Commissioner McIntosh as ARC Vice Chair. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Latkovic and carried by a 5-0 vote. (AYES: Colvard, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None). In response to inquiry, Planning Manager Lua requested permission from Chair Vuksic to address commissioner comments in the comments section of the agenda after the review of action items. Chair Vuksic allowed comments by the requesting commissioner to be heard at this time in the meeting. It was asserted that five commissioners on the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) was more appropriate than seven members. With consideration to the members who are volunteering their time and to applicants, five qualified members on the commission is more efficient. With seven members there is too much discussion, not all comments are constructive, and slows down the process. There should be a focused and structured approach to reviewing agenda items to allow for review process to be more expeditious. Additionally, it was observed that for many years the ARC operated with five members, when membership increased to seven members there was a noticeable change and the meetings slowed down. When there were five members attendance was good, meetings were efficient, and items moved along quickly. Reference was made to Planning Commission and City Council as examples to support the recommendation of five members for the ARC. It was noted that beyond five members, the comments have diminishing returns in value. Comments that need to be said are often accomplished in the first three to five reviews. Planning Manager Lua advised staff would relay comments and concerns stated by commissioners to the Committee/Commission Review Subcommittee. In response to inquiry, Planning Manger Lua stated City councilmembers wanted seven members on the commission to include a variety of representation consisting of the members of the public and appropriate professional expertise to allow for continued business even with recusals due to a conflict of interest of a commissioner(s). Planning Manager Lua advised there will be an appointment of a new ARC member going before the City Council at their next meeting on August 25, 2022, and commissioners can speak during the public comment period regarding their concerns. PRELIMINARY MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 2022 3 B. SELECTION of Commission liaison for the Cultural Arts Committee. Planning Manager Lua advised selection of a liaison for the Cultural Arts Committee (CAC) will be conducted annually and called for a nomination by Commissioners. Commissioner Colvard volunteered to be the commissions liaison for the CAC noting he is an artist and is well acquainted with the artist community. Chair Vuksic moved to appoint Commissioner Colvard as commission liaison for the Cultural Arts Committee. The motion was seconded by Commissioner McAuliffe and carried by a 5-0 vote. (AYES: Colvard, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None). V. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Planning Manager Lua read aloud oral communications advising the public of their opportunity to speak on items not on the agenda at this time in the meeting. No public comments were provided. VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES of the Architectural Review Commission meeting of June 28, 2022. Upon a motion by Chair Vuksic, seconded by Commissioner Latkovic, and a 4-0-1 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, the minutes for June 28, 2022, were approved as presented. (AYES: Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: Colvard). VII. CASES It should be noted associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at, https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees- and-commissions/commission-information. A. FINAL DRAWINGS 1. CASE NO: MISC22-0014 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a wall setback exception to the City of Palm Desert Fence and Wall Ordinance for a five-foot tall decorative block wall with breeze block accents at a setback of twelve feet from the face of curb. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Stacey Harding, Palm Desert, CA 92260 LOCATION: 45420 Abronia Trail ZONE: R-3 PRELIMINARY MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 2022 4 Associate Planner, Kevin Swartz, presented the item. Associate Planner Swartz advised the applicant has requested this item be continued to the next regularly scheduled Architectural Review Commission meeting. Associate Planner Swartz advised commissioners per Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) wall and fence exceptions require notice be sent to adjacent property owners. Notice was sent as required by the PDMC, therefore, staff recommended the ARC allow for public comment on this item. The public was invited to provide comments on this item, to which there were none. Upon a motion by Commissioner McAuliffe, seconded by Chair Vuksic, and a 4-0-1 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, Case No. MISC22-0014 was continued to the September 13, 2022 meeting. (AYES: Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: Colvard). 2. CASE NO: MISC22-0013 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval to construct Mechanics Bank, a new 3,830 square-foot commercial building located in the Jensen’s Shopping Center at 73611 Highway 111. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: McAuliffe & Co. Architects, Palm Desert, CA 92260 LOCATION: 73611 Highway 111 ZONE: DO Commissioner McAuliffe advised the Commission his firm is representing the applicant. Commissioner McAuliffe recused himself from this item due to a conflict of interest. Planning Manager Lua advised that according to the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) rule of necessity, Commissioner McAuliffe will be required to participate as a voting member for this item. Staff consulted with the City attorney and Commissioner McAuliffe’s participation is legally required to establish the minimum members necessary to form a quorum for action on this item. Additionally, the item will be presented by another party. Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, presented the item, noting this item is a final approval by the ARC. The presentation was turned over to the applicant, and their team including Jennifer Guinn and Bill Lang who presented additional details on the project and answered questions from the Commission. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Planning Manager, Rosie Lua, invited comments from the public, to which there were none. Upon a motion by Commissioner Latkovic, seconded by Vice Chair McIntosh, and a 4-0-1 vote of the Architectural Review Commission, Case No. MISC22-0013 was approved subject to the following: 1) Add landscape in the area between the proposed block wall and public sidewalk on the north and PRELIMINARY MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 2022 5 east portions of the property; and 2) Applicant will return to the ARC for review of a more developed illustration of rake detail including how detail terminates into the surrounding element prior to building permit issuance and specific details for proposed wood fascia siding. (AYES: Colvard, Latkovic, McIntosh, and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: McAuliffe). 3. CASE NO: MISC22-0009 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a new front entry façade modification and minor addition to the Palm Desert Community Center located within the Civic Center Park. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Desert Recreation District, Indio, CA 92201 LOCATION: 43900 San Pablo Avenue ZONE: P At this time in the meeting Commissioner Latkovic advised staff he was unable to rejoin the meeting due to internet connection issues and left the meeting at 1:59 p.m. Due to lack of a quorum this item has been deferred to a date uncertain. 4. CASE NO: PP21-0009 – Amendment #1 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of an amendment to PP21-0009 revising the exterior architecture for the 330-unit multi- family residential community on a 15-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and extension of Technology Drive. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Apogee Professional Services, Omaha, NE, 68144 LOCATION: NE Corner of Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive ZONE: Millennium Specific Plan Area 7, PR-22 Due to lack of a quorum this item has been deferred to a date uncertain. B. PRELIMINARY PLANS 1. CASE NOS: PP/CUP 22-0006 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan and Conditional Use Permit to construct a 394-unit apartment community located on the southwest corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Hayes Dietrich, LLC, Edina, MN 55436 LOCATION: SW Corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue PRELIMINARY MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 2022 6 ZONE: PR-22 Due to lack of a quorum this item has been deferred to a date uncertain. 2. CASE NO: PP22-0005 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan for West Coast Storage Facility, a 53,378 square-foot personal storage facility located at the northwest corner of Dick Kelly Drive and Dinah Shore Drive. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Scott A. Mommer Consulting, Peoria AZ, 85383 LOCATION: NWC - Dick Kelly Drive and Dinah Shore Drive ZONE: SI Due to lack of a quorum this item has been deferred to a date uncertain. C. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION and feedback regarding proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 1374 § 1 and Ordinance 1258 § 1, revising Section 24.04.060 (Invasive Plant Species) of the Palm Desert Municipal Code relating to Prohibited Landscape Material for Development Design and Installation. Due to lack of a quorum this item has been deferred to a date uncertain. VIII. COMMENTS Planning Manager Lua introduced Assistant City Manager, Chris Escobedo, to the Commission. Comments from the commission included a request to hold a meeting between staff and commissioners to discuss how the ARC moves forward in an efficient manner by outlining the expectations and responsibilities of commissioners, establishing a structured approach for efficiency, objectively critiquing and analyzing a project, reinforcing criteria to applicants, and minimizing repetitive comments by commissioners. Planning Manager Lua stated staff could set up a study session to address commissioner’s request and comments. IX. ADJOURNMENT With Architectural Review Commission concurrence, Chair Vuksic adjourned the meeting at 2:41 p.m. Rosie Lua, Secretary Melinda Gonzalez, Recording Secretary CITY OF PALM DESERT SPECIAL MEETING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION PRELIMINARY MINUTES TUESDAY, AUGUST 30, 2022 – 12:30 P.M. ZOOM VIRTUAL MEETING CITY OF PALM DESERT, CA I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Vuksic called the meeting to order at 12:31 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present Absent Dean Wallace Colvard X Nicholas Latkovic (Left meeting at 1:59 p.m.) X Michael McAuliffe X Jim McIntosh X John Vuksic X Also Present: Todd Hileman, City Manager Chris Escobedo, Assistant City Manager/Director of Development Services Richard Cannone, Deputy Director of Development Services Rosie Lua, Planning Manager Nick Melloni, Senior Planner Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner Randy Chavez, Community Services Manager Shawn Muir, Management Analyst Melinda Gonzalez, Recording Secretary The attendance record report was provided with the agenda materials. The Commission took no action on this matter. III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Chair Vuksic read aloud oral communications advising the public of their opportunity to speak on items not on the agenda at this time in the meeting. No public comments were provided. PRELIMINARY MINUTES – SPECIAL MEETING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 30, 2022 2 IV. CASES It should be noted associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at, https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees- and-commissions/commission-information. A. FINAL DRAWINGS 1. CASE NO: MISC22-0009 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a new front entry façade modification and minor addition to the Palm Desert Community Center located within the Civic Center Park. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Desert Recreation District, Indio, CA 92201 LOCATION: 43900 San Pablo Avenue ZONE: P Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the item and responded to Commission inquiries. The presentation was turned over to the applicant, and their architect, Matt Acton, who presented additional details on the project and answered questions from the Commission. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Chair Vuksic opened and closed the public comment period, there being no member of the public desiring to speak. Following discussion, a motion for continuance was made by Vice Chair McIntosh, seconded by Commissioner Latkovic, and carried by a 5-0 vote of the Commission. During deliberations, Commissioners’ offered commentary as follows: 1) Applicant shall submit a complete application packet including a clearly defined roof plan; 2) Massing should be prioritized over materials to give definition to the building; 3) Revisit corner detail of stone materials, if available, use pre-fabricated mitered corners or use different material; 4) Provide consistency for shading elements proposed, including material and placement of supporting structures for awnings; and 5) Integrate eyebrows in a more thoughtful manner. (AYES: Colvard, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None). Individual Commissioner’s offered additional commentary as follows. The points below do not necessarily reflect consensus: • Consider different placement for proposed stone material. • Stone material at entry should return fully to inside corner. • Directional placement of metal panels should be consistent. • The stone veneer shall wrap at corners and should only terminate where there is a change in building plane or building massing. The final construction plans shall include sufficient detail to demonstrate how the stone veneer will be applied. PRELIMINARY MINUTES – SPECIAL MEETING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 30, 2022 3 • Final construction plans shall include a detail indicating the stone veneer will have mitered corners. • Final roof plan shall demonstrate the parapet return of the front entry tower is consistent with the elevations approved by ARC. • Final construction plans shall include a detail showing the stone veneer columns shall project a minimum of 0’-8” from the building fascia to be consistent with the elevations approved by ARC. • Cornice detail does not fit with proposed design. By consensus, the Commission directed the applicant to revise the project design based on Commissioners’ comments and to return to the Commission to a date uncertain. 2. CASE NO: PP21-0009 – Amendment #1 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of an amendment to PP21-0009 revising the exterior architecture for the 330-unit multi- family residential community on a 15-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and extension of Technology Drive. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Apogee Professional Services, Omaha, NE, 68144 LOCATION: NE Corner of Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive ZONE: Millennium Specific Plan Area 7, PR-22 Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the item and responded to Commission inquiries. The presentation was turned over to the applicant and their team including Kassie Inness and architect, Michael Militello, who presented additional details on the project and answered questions from the Commission. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Chair Vuksic opened and closed the public comment period, there being no member of the public desiring to speak. Following discussion, a motion for continuance was made by Chair Vuksic, seconded by Commissioner McAuliffe, and carried by a 5-0 vote of the Commission. During deliberations, Commissioners’ offered commentary as follows: 1) Originally approved glazing design proposed at stairwell towers should remain, if modified glazing should be designed to differentiate stairwell tower from residential unit glazing; 2) Surfaces between upper and lower window stories should be recessed at least two inches to maintain vertical appearance; 3) Retain more of the metal window awnings from the original design; 4) Downspouts should be internal; 5) Proposed white vinyl should be dark vinyl; and 6) Applicant should be mindful of roof design. (AYES: Colvard, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None). PRELIMINARY MINUTES – SPECIAL MEETING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 30, 2022 4 Individual Commissioner’s offered additional commentary as follows. The points below do not necessarily reflect consensus: • Preserve elements of original approval as much as possible. • Windows need more recessing. • Panel between windows should be recessed to preserve architectural detail. • Revisit massing, forms should have undulation/change in plane where color transitions, and increased recessing. • Dark vertical elements should remain recessed from white stucco forms. • Provide a variety of stucco textures including areas where wood shiplap detail is being removed. • Revisit downspout terminations including those that terminate into planters. By consensus, the Commission directed the applicant to revise the project design based on Commissioners’ comments and to return to the Commission to a date uncertain. B. PRELIMINARY PLANS 1. CASE NO: PP22-0005 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan for West Coast Storage Facility, a 53,378 square-foot personal storage facility located at the northwest corner of Dick Kelly Drive and Dinah Shore Drive. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Scott A. Mommer Consulting, Peoria AZ, 85383 LOCATION: NWC - Dick Kelly Drive and Dinah Shore Drive ZONE: SI Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the item and responded to Commission inquiries. The presentation was turned over to the applicant and their team, including Janay Mommer, Jim Fitzpatrick, and Colleen Nolan, who presented additional details on the project and answered questions from the Commission. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Chair Vuksic opened and closed the public comment period, there being no member of the public desiring to speak. Following discussion, a motion for continuance was made by Commissioner McAuliffe, seconded by Vice Chair McIntosh, and carried by a 5-0 vote of the Commission. During deliberations, Commissioners’ offered commentary as follows: 1) Revisit design techniques used to break up overall mass of the building, design should be more cohesive; 2) Remove trellis elements; 3) Revisit central connecting element on south elevation, provide relief or other element to allow design to read as two buildings instead of a continuous building; 4) Provide a suitable alternative for southern live oak; 5) The applicant shall provide a meandering sidewalk and additional landscaping PRELIMINARY MINUTES – SPECIAL MEETING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 30, 2022 5 on the Dinah Shore Drive frontage, rather than curb adjacent landscaping, to maintain consistency with existing industrial development along the corridor, while considering vehicular line-of-sight for Dinah Shore Drive and Spyder Circle; 6) The applicant shall provide additional landscape plantings for trees along Dinah Shore Drive and Dick Kelly Drive; 7) The applicant shall provide additional cobble as a part of the landscape plan to provide a variation in texture, soil stabilization, and for resistance to high winds; 8) The applicant shall verify that the roof-top units on the western portion of the building shall fully screened with consideration to the changes in parapet height to ensure there is no visibility from all vantage points; 9) The applicant shall identify the minimum number of landscape plantings for each respective live planting shown on the landscape plan; 10) The proposed exterior wall signage construction, if proposed facing existing residential and/or residentially zoned properties, shall utilize halo-illumination to reduce glare for adjacent residential areas; 11) Roof drainage systems shall be placed within interior walls; 12) Applicant shall provide screening of parking areas from Spyder Circle by means of low block wall, landscape, or berm; and 13) The walls of the trash enclosure shall be finished to match the primary building. (AYES: Colvard, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None). Individual Commissioner’s offered additional commentary as follows. The points below do not necessarily reflect consensus: • Consider use of landscaping, glazing, or other elements to break up building and to help with transition from residential to commercial. • Variety in architecture is too diverse and does not tie together, use a continuous theme to provide a more cohesive design. By consensus, the Commission directed the applicant to revise the project design based on Commissioners’ comments and to return to the Commission to a date uncertain. C. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION and feedback regarding proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 1374 § 1 and Ordinance 1258 § 1, revising Section 24.04.060 (Invasive Plant Species) of the Palm Desert Municipal Code relating to Prohibited Landscape Material for Development Design and Installation. Management Analyst, Shawn Muir, and Community Services Manager, Randy Chavez, acknowledged the staff report before the Commission and requested feedback on the proposed ordinance amendment. Commissioners provided comments and agreed with staff’s recommendation to City Council for the proposed ordinance revision. V. COMMENTS Planning Manager, Rosie Lua, reported at the last City Council meeting a new commissioner was appointed to the ARC. Upon request, Planning Manager Lua provided an update on the DSRT Surf project. PRELIMINARY MINUTES – SPECIAL MEETING ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 30, 2022 6 In response to inquiry, Planning Manager Lua provided an update on the proposed project for 394-units located at the southwest corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue (PP/CUP22-0006). VI. ADJOURNMENT The Architectural Review Commission adjourned at 3:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Melinda Gonzalez, Senior Administrative Assistant Recording Secretary ATTEST: Rosie Lua, Planning Manager Secretary APPROVED BY ARC: __/__/2022 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Kevin Swartz, Associate Planner Date: September 13, 2022 Subject: MISC22-0014 – 45420 Abronia Trail – Harding Residence Wall Exception Project Summary The project is a request for a wall height and setback exception to the City of Palm Desert Fence and Wall Ordinance. The Applicant is proposing to construct a five-foot tall decorative block wall with breeze block accents at a setback of twelve feet from the face of curb in the front yard (property line) of a single-family residential property located at 45420 Abronia Trail. The wall also angles back adjacent to the driveway connecting to the house. A five-foot tall swinging gate will be included for access from the driveway. The design proposal includes decorative block with breeze block accents that will be painted white to match the newly painted house (white). The twelve-foot parkway area between the face of curb and wall will be landscaped with Mediterranean fan palm trees and new gravel. The applicant’s request for a wall exception is to accommodate the proposed swimming pool in the front yard, which is 15-feet, 6-inches from the face of curb. Due to the irregular pie shaped lot and existing home location with a non-conforming rear setback, a swimming pool cannot be constructed in the rear yard. Per the California Health and Safety Code Section 115923, a minimum height 60” fence/wall enclosure is required around swimming pools. The property currently has an existing three-foot high breeze block wall eight feet from the face of curb which will be demolished. Zoning Ordinance Summary The Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) requires Architectural Review Commission (ARC) approval for all wall exceptions for heights and materials subject to findings listed under Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC 25.40.080). The subject property is zoned R-3, which establishes a minimum lot size of 3,000 square feet. The area of the property is approximately 3,920.4 square-feet, or 0.09-acres which is 31 % above the minimum requirement. The existing lot shape is non-conforming as the shape does not comply with the general requirements of Subdivision Ordinance Section 26.40.140 – Lot Standards. This section generally requires the side lines of all lots, to the greatest extent, should be at right angles (90 degrees) to the street faces or approximately to the radial of a curvature. The existing lot lines intersect to create a triangle, thereby reducing the buildable area of the parcel. MISC 22-0014 – Harding Residence Page 2 of 2 September 13, 2022 The code requires 5-foot walls be setback a minimum of 15 feet from the face of curb. Exceptions to the standards of the Ordinance may be granted subject to ARC approval based on the following findings: 1. That unusual circumstances exist which make the literal interpretation and enforcement of the standards impractical or contrary to the purpose of the ordinance codified in this section. The property’s unique circumstances are its irregular pie shaped lot and existing home location restricting the development of a swimming pool elsewhere on property, the front yard being the only suitable location. The proposed swimming pool is 15-feet, 6-inches from the face of curb in the front yard, which requires a minimum five-foot high wall to provide a barrier as required by the California Health and Safety Code. Since the pool is located 15 feet, 6 inches from the face of curb, the wall requirement of a five-foot high wall at 15 feet from face of curb could not be achieved. The proposed decorative block wall with breeze block accents is more in keeping with the architecture of the home. The updated landscape plan also enhances the property and the curb appearance. 2. The exception shall not result in damage to adjacent properties. Staff has reviewed the exception request including the supporting documents and has concluded that it does not result in any apparent or immediate damage to adjacent properties. 3. Property owners adjacent to the proposed exception shall be informed of the application at least ten days prior to the ARC meeting. A public notification was mailed to property owners abutting the proposed project at least ten (10) days prior to the meeting date as required by Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 25.40.080 (E)(1)(iii) for the ARC meeting held August 23, 2022. On August 23, 2022, the item was brought before the ARC. With the item having provided notice, the ARC opened and closed the public comment period with no comments provide. The matter was continued at the request of the applicant to a date certain of September 13, 2022. Staff has not received any comments to date. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed wall exception based on staff’s analysis of the required findings for this exception. Staff further recommends that any modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as a conditions of approval. Attachments: 1. Plans Submitted by Applicant. CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Senior Planner Date: September 13, 2022 Case No: PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Subject: Consideration of an amendment to PP21-0009, revising the exterior architecture for a 330-unit multi-family residential community on a 15-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and the extension Technology Drive. BACKGROUND On December 14, 2021, the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) recommended approval to the Planning Commission for Millennium Apartments (PP21-0009), a 330-unit apartment development, subject to ten (10) conditions of approval listed on the attached Notice of Action dated December 29, 2021. On March 15, 2022, the Planning Commission by Resolution No. 2809 approved the project accepting the conditions of approval by the ARC. On August 15, 2022, the applicant submitted a request to modify the architecture for the approved Millennium Apartments. The requested changes are summarized below: • Window Reduction - Reduction in the amount of exterior glazing by reducing the window size. The typical residential windows have eliminated the bottom window panel on each unit and eliminated storefront sidelight on ground-floor entries and garage doors. • Vinyl Frame and Color - Changed windows to feature vinyl frames and changed the color from black to white. • Metal Awnings - Reduced the number of metal awnings and vertical shade fins. • Reduced Fiber Cement – Reduced the amount of fiber cement board with a wood appearance on the exterior elevations. • Downspouts – Utilizing exterior building mounted downspouts on all elevations. On August 30, 2022, the ARC reviewed modifications to the exterior architecture of the residential buildings, and requested a continuance of the item with the following comments: • Originally approved glazing design proposed at stairwell towers should remain, if modified glazing should be designed to differentiate stairwell tower from residential unit glazing. • Surfaces between upper and lower window stories should be recessed at least two inches to maintain vertical appearance. PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 2 of 10 September 13, 2022 • Retain more of the metal window awnings from the original design. • Downspouts should be internal. • Proposed white vinyl should be dark vinyl. • Applicant should be mindful of roof design. Additional comments include: • Preserve elements of original approval as much as possible. • Windows need more recessing. • Panel between windows should be recessed to preserve architectural detail. • Revisit massing, forms should have undulation/change in plane where color transitions, and increased recessing. • Dark vertical elements should remain recessed from white stucco forms. • Provide a variety of stucco textures including areas where wood shiplap detail is being removed. • Revisit downspout terminations including those that terminate into planters. PROJECT SUMMARY A. Property Description: The project site is a vacant 15-acre property located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive (Parcel 7 of Parcel Map 36792). The site topography is generally level with elevations ranging from 173’ Above Mean Sea Level (AMSL) at the western property boundary to 169’ AMSL at the east end. The Gerald Ford Drive is located at the southern edge of the property and is developed with full road width, curb, and gutter. Technology Drive is located along the west and northern boundaries of the parcel and is currently undeveloped. B. Zoning and General Plan Designation: Zone: Millennium Palm Desert Specific Plan (MSP) - Planned Residential – 22 dwelling units per acre (PR-22) / Housing Overlay District General Plan: Town Center Neighborhood (TCN) – 7 to 40 dwelling units per acre (du/acre) C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: MSP – PA 3 - Service Industrial (SI) – Vacant area intended for business park South: University Neighborhood Specific Plan (UNSP) – PR-5 – University Park, approved for single-family residential East: MSP – PA 4 - Planned Commercial – Under construction for hotel development including Holiday Inn Express and future Staybridge Hotel West: MSP – PA 8 – Planned Residential – Under consideration for 241-unit multi-family residential development. Project Description PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 3 of 10 September 13, 2022 The table below illustrates the Applicant’s revisions to the exterior elevations in response to ARC comments from August 30, 2022: ARC Comment Design Response from August 30, 2022 Originally approved glazing design proposed at stairwell towers should remain, if modified glazing should be designed to differentiate stairwell tower from residential unit glazing • The applicant has added a stucco treatment to the space between the upper and lower stairwell windows. Surfaces between upper and lower window stories should be recessed at least two inches to maintain vertical appearance • The applicant shows the plan with recessed windows. The area between the upper and lower area has been flattened. Retain more of the metal window awnings from the original design • The applicant has not increased the number of window awnings. Downspouts should be internal. • Removed exterior applied downspouts along Technology Drive and Gerald Ford Drive. Proposed white vinyl should be dark vinyl. • The applicant has proposed white vinyl windows. Applicant should be mindful of roof design. • No modifications were proposed to the roof design. During the December meeting, the ARC voiced concerns regarding the visibility of rooftop units from the Cook Street overpass. To respond to this concern, the applicant revised the roof design to organize rooftop units with an assumed height of 4’-0” in groupings and located them behind four-sided 6’-3” tall rooftop parapets. Existing structures single-, and three-story within the vicinity of Cook Street were approved with full height parapets and the rooftop units have minimal visibility. The apartments in comparison will be further away, and taller (accounting for topography), which will further minimum view angles for rooftop equipment. Pages 4 through 9 provide comparisons the proposed and exterior changes. PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 4 of 10 September 13, 2022 Figure 1 - Renderings of approved architecture (19-plex) Figure 2 - Renderings of proposed architecture revisions (19-plex) PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 5 of 10 September 13, 2022 Window Modifications Proposed Change Original Approval • Reduce overall window glazing area by 20-25%. • Window frame color changed to white. • Eliminate bottom panel of the windows system on each residential unit. • Reduced full height window on storefront. Added darkened stucco between upper and lower window. • Additional glazing for all units • Window frame color: black. • Bottom panel of the windows system on each residential unit. • Full height window on storefront • PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 6 of 10 September 13, 2022 • Eliminated sidelight garage. • Reduced sidelite ground floor entry • Original garage. • Sidelite on ground floor entry Awnings and Vertical Metal Fins Proposed Change Original Approval • Reduce total number of awning elements. • Horizontal shades on third story only. • Awning elements • Horizontal shades on second and third • Bottom panel of the windows system on each residential unit. PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 7 of 10 September 13, 2022 • Vertical fins placed on second story corner only • Vertical fins placed on second and third stories Reduced Fiber Cement Proposed Change Original Approval • Reduce fiber cement “wood” siding on rear elevation • Fiber cement, horizontal “wood siding used on rear elevation PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 8 of 10 September 13, 2022 • Reduce fiber cement on portions of front • Fiber cement on portions of front Drainage Downspouts Proposed Change Original Approval • Front elevation downspouts on interior. Rear elevations feature exterior • Downspouts located on interior. PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 9 of 10 September 13, 2022 The changes will be applied across all 15 residential buildings within the project. The building types include a 19-plex and 28-plex. No other changes are proposed to the site plan. The changes do not affect the architectural massing or area of the buildings. ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY ARC approval is required for all Precise Plan applications per PDMC Section 25.68.020 (A). Findings for ARC decisions are listed under PDMC Section 25.68.040 – Findings of the ARC. Findings in support of the project are listed below: To approve a design review application, the ARC shall find the following: A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. The proposed changes to not affect the project’s conformance with the legally adopted development standards set forth by the Millennium Palm Desert Specific Plan for Planning Area 7. B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. The proposed modifications do not affect the architectural character of the projec t or its relationship to existing or proposed development in the area. The changes do not alter the area, massing, height, or intensity of development on the site. The proposed modifications will affect the exterior material palette but will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood and will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and will not create traffic hazards or congestion. C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the General Plan of the City. PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 10 of 10 September 13, 2022 The architectural modifications to the proposed development do not adversely affect the compatibility of project with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by the zoning Code and General Plan. D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. The proposed modifications alter the exterior material palette of the project by scaling back windows, exterior wall cladding, and metal awnings. The design still utilizes high- quality finishes and features a quality contemporary design characterized by articulated building forms, varying building materials and textures, varying rooflines, balconies, and desert compatible colors. The buildings will provide for a quality visual aesthetic along Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive. E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. The proposed modifications to the project do not affect the project’s conformance with legally adopted development standards set forth by the Millennium Palm Desert Specific Plan for Planning Area 7. The project conforms with all applicable development standards. F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed modifications consist of exterior material changes and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. All changes shall be designed to comply with applicable Health and Safety Codes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the Findings have been met based on the analysis and approve the case with the following modifications. Any modifications required by the ARC should be added as conditions of approval: 1. The area between upper and lower story windows shall be recessed a minimum of 3” from the fascia. 2. Awnings shall be provided over the second and third story residential windows for all street facing elevations as shown on the original approval. Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits from the Applicant. 2. ARC Staff Memo dated August 30, 2022 3. ARC Staff Memo dated December 14, 2021, and Notice of Action Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com Apogee Professional Services 12149 W. Center Rd. Omaha, NE 68144 APOGEE - MILLENNIUM PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA # 2021-0114 PRECISE PLAN SUBMITTAL APRIL 25, 2022 A6-0BUILDING PERSPECTIVES BUILDING 'A' // 19 PLEXNTS PARKING PERSPECTIVE ELEVATION | BUILDING A : 19 PLEX FRONT ELEVATION | BUILDING A : 19 PLEX SIDE PERSPECTIVE ELEVATION | BUILDING A : 19 PLEX Architecture + Planning 888.456.5849 ktgy.com Apogee Professional Services 12149 W. Center Rd. Omaha, NE 68144 APOGEE - MILLENNIUM PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA # 2021-0114 PRECISE PLAN SUBMITTAL APRIL 25, 2022 A6-1BUILDING PERSPECTIVES BUILDING 'B' // 28 PLEXNTS PARKING PERSPECTIVE ELEVATION | BUILDING B : 28 PLEX FRONT ELEVATION | BUILDING B : 28 PLEX SIDE PERSPECTIVE ELEVATION | BUILDING B : 28 PLEX CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Senior Planner Date: August 30, 2022 - Revised Case No: PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Subject: Consideration of an amendment to PP21-0009, revising the exterior architecture for the 330-unit multi-family residential community on a 15-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and the extension Technology Drive. BACKGROUND On March 15, 2022, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 2809 approving PP21- 0009 for the 330-unit apartment development generally known as “Millennium Apartments”. The Architectural Review Commission (ARC) reviewed the project on December 14, 2021, subject to the ten (10) conditions of approval listed on the attached Notice of Action dated December 29, 2021. PROJECT SUMMARY A. Property Description: The project site is a vacant 15-acre property located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive (Parcel 7 of Parcel Map 36792). The site topography is generally level with elevations ranging from 173’ Above Mean Sea Level (AMSL) at the western property boundary to 169’ AMSL at the east end. The Gerald Ford Drive is located at the southern edge of the property and is developed with full road width, curb, and gutter. Technology Drive is located along the west and northern boundaries of the parcel and is currently undeveloped. B. Zoning and General Plan Designation: Zone: Millennium Palm Desert Specific Plan (MSP) - Planned Residential – 22 dwelling units per acre (PR-22) / Housing Overlay District General Plan: Town Center Neighborhood (TCN) – 7 to 40 dwelling units per acre (du/acre) PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 2 of 9 August 30, 2021 - Revised C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: MSP – PA 3 - Service Industrial (SI) – Vacant area intended for business park South: University Neighborhood Specific Plan (UNSP) – PR-5 – University Park, approved for single-family residential East: MSP – PA 4 - Planned Commercial – Under construction for hotel development including Holiday Inn Express and future Staybridge Hotel West: MSP – PA 8 – Planned Residential – Under consideration for 241-unit multi- family residential development. Project Description The project request is an amendment to the architecture for the approved Millennium Apartments. The changes are summarized in the applicant’s letter dated August 15, 2022. Changes include: • Window Reduction - Reduction in the amount of exterior glazing by reducing the window size. The typical residential windows have eliminated the bottom window panel on each unit and eliminated storefront sidelight on ground-floor entries and garage doors. • Vinyl Frame and Color - Changed windows to feature vinyl frames and changed the color from black to white. • Metal Awnings - Reduced the number of metal awnings and vertical shade fins. • Reduced Fiber Cement – Reduced the amount of fiber cement board with a wood appearance on the exterior elevations. • Downspouts – Utilizing exterior building mounted downspouts on all elevations. Pages 3 through 9 provide comparisons the proposed and exterior changes. PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 3 of 9 August 30, 2021 - Revised Figure 1 - Renderings of approved architecture (19-plex) Figure 2 - Renderings of proposed architecture revisions (19-plex) PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 4 of 9 August 30, 2021 - Revised Window Modifications Proposed Change Original Approval • Reduce overall window glazing area by 20-25%. • Window frame color changed to white. • Eliminate bottom panel of the windows system on each residential unit. • Reduced full height window on storefront • Eliminated sidelight garage. • Additional glazing for all units • Window frame color: black. • Bottom panel of the windows system on each residential unit. • Full height window on storefront • Original garage. PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 5 of 9 August 30, 2021 - Revised Awnings and Vertical Metal Fins Proposed Change Original Approval • Reduce total number of awning elements. • Horizontal shades on third story only. • Vertical fins placed on second story corner only • Awning elements • Horizontal shades on second and third • Bottom panel of the windows system on each residential unit. • Vertical fins placed on second and third stories PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 6 of 9 August 30, 2021 - Revised Reduced Fiber Cement Proposed Change Original Approval • Reduce fiber cement “wood” siding on rear elevation • Reduce fiber cement on portions of front • Fiber cement, horizontal “wood siding used on rear elevation • Fiber cement on portions of front PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 7 of 9 August 30, 2021 - Revised Drainage Downspouts Proposed Change Original Approval • Place downspouts on exterior. • Downspouts located on interior. The changes will be applied across all 15 residential buildings within the project. The building types include a 19-plex and 28-plex. No other changes are proposed to the site plan. The changes do not affect the architectural massing or area of the buildings. The proposal still provides for full screening of all roof top units. The use of exterior downspouts conflicts with condition of approval No. 6 of the original ARC approval letter per the December 29, 2021, Notice of Action. Additionally, Planning Commission Resolution No. 2809 included condition of approval No. 17 requiring internal downspouts on all street-facing elevations. ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY ARC approval is required for all Precise Plan applications per PDMC Section 25.68.020 (A). Findings for ARC decisions are listed under PDMC Section 25.68.040 – Findings of the ARC. Findings in support of the project are listed below: To approve a design review application, the ARC shall find the following: A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 8 of 9 August 30, 2021 - Revised The proposed changes to not affect the project’s conformance with the legally adopted development standards set forth by the Millennium Palm Desert Specific Plan for Planning Area 7. B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. The proposed modifications do not affect the architectural character of the projec t or its relationship to existing or proposed development in the area. The changes do not alter the area, massing, height, or intensity of development on the site. The proposed modifications will affect the exterior material palette but will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood and will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and will not create traffic hazards or congestion. C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the General Plan of the City. The architectural modifications to the proposed development do not adversely affect the compatibility of project with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by the zoning Code and General Plan. D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. The proposed modifications alter the exterior material palette of the project by scaling back windows, exterior wall cladding, and metal awnings. The design still utilizes high-quality finishes and features a quality contemporary design characterized by articulated building forms, varying building materials and textures, varying rooflines, balconies, and desert compatible colors. The buildings will provide for a quality visual aesthetic along Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive. E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. The proposed modifications to the project do not affect the project ’s conformance with legally adopted development standards set forth by the Millennium Palm Desert Specific Plan for Planning Area 7. The project conforms with all applicable development standards. F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. PP 21-0009 – Amendment #1 Millennium Apartments Page 9 of 9 August 30, 2021 - Revised The proposed modifications consist of exterior material changes and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. All changes shall be designed to comply with applicable Health and Safety Codes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the Findings have been met based on the analysis and approves the request subject to the following condition of approval: 1. Applicant shall redesign the external downspouts to blend into the architecture with reduced visual prominence and work with Planning staff to incorporate the change into the final construction set. Staff further recommends that modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval. Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits from the Applicant. 2. Applicant’s Letter dated August 15, 2022. 3. Notice of Action dated December 29, 2021. CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Associate Planner Date: December 14, 2021 Case No: PP 21-0009 Subject: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan and Environmental Assessment to construct a 330-unit multi-family residential community consisting of 15 three-story apartment buildings, a single- story clubhouse, pool area, and private outdoor recreation areas on a 15-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive. BACKGROUND On March 26, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1281 approving the Millennium Specific Plan (MSP). The MSP establishes zoning designations, design standards, procedures, and roadway configurations for a 152±acre area generally located on the north side of Gerald Ford Drive, east of Technology Drive, west of Portola Avenue, and south of the Union Pacific Railroad. The MSP establishes nine (9) mixed-use planning areas/parcels, as shown in the exhibit below. Exhibit 1 – Millennium Specific Plan – Planning Area and Land Use Map – MSP Pg. 18 PP 21-0009 Millennium Apartments Page 2 of 9 December 14, 2021 The proposal is located on Parcel 7, also known as Planning Area 7, of the MSP, which is a 15- acre site planned for up to 330-units of multi-family housing at an allowable maximum density of 22 dwelling units per acre. Additionally, per the original conditions of approval for the MSP, this site is required to provide 20% affordable housing units for a total of 66 affordable units. PROJECT SUMMARY A. Property Description: The project site is a vacant 15-acre property located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive (Parcel 7 of Parcel Map 36792). The site topography is generally level, with elevations ranging from 173’ Above Mean Sea Level (AMSL) at the western property boundary to 169’ AMSL at the east end. The Gerald Ford Drive is located at the southern edge of the property and is developed with full road width, curb, and gutter. Technology Drive is located along the west and northern boundaries of the parcel and is currently undeveloped. B. Zoning and General Plan Designation: Zone: Millennium Specific Plan - Planned Residential – 22 dwelling units per acre (PR-22) / Housing Overlay District General Plan: Town Center Neighborhood (TCN) – 7 to 40 dwelling units per acre (du/acre) C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: MSP – PA 3 - Service Industrial (SI) – Vacant area intended for business park South: University Neighborhood Specific Plan (UNSP) – PR-5 – University Park, approved for single-family residential East: MSP – PA 4 - Planned Commercial – Under construction for hotel development including Holiday Inn Express and future Staybridge Hotel West: MSP – PA 8 – Planned Residential – Under consideration for 241-unit multi-family residential development. Project Description The project request is a Precise Plan (PP) to develop a 330-unit multi-family apartment community on a vacant 15-acre site. At least 20% of the units (66 total) will be affordable units. The project will include the development of: • Fifteen (15) three-story residential apartment buildings. • One (1) single-story 5,500 ± square foot clubhouse building containing a leasing area, clubhouse, coworking space, and fitness area. • One (1) 15,000 ± square-foot amenity area and pool deck. • 596 onsite parking spaces. • Open space amenities include a botanical garden walk, dog park, and passive open- space area. PP 21-0009 Millennium Apartments Page 3 of 9 December 14, 2021 • Eight (8) basins for on-site stormwater retention. • Storm drains to convey excess storm flows to an off-site retention basin located on a City-owned park site within Planning Area 9 of the MSP. • Off-site improvements consist of the following: o Extension of Technology Drive along the project frontage o Public sidewalks and utility corridors along the project frontage o One (1) right-hand turn lane on westbound Gerald Ford Drive at the intersection of Technology Drive o Two (2) vehicular access driveways. The project plans are divided into sections for architecture, civil and landscape. Refer to the title sheet (Sheet A0-0) for the table of contents. Site Plan The site plan is shown on page A1.0 of the architectural plan set, and a color copy is shown on Sheet L-1 of the landscape plan set. The site plan is arranged so that the residential apartment buildings front upon either public streets, private open space areas, or internal drive aisles. The Gerald Ford Drive frontage is lined with apartment buildings. Parking areas generally are located at the rear area of the apartment buildings to screen vehicle areas from the public streets and private open space areas. The Technology Drive frontage is occupied by parking areas to create a buffer for apartments from the future business park area and existing Union Pacific Railroad located to the north of the site. Parking is provided in the form of garages attached to apartment buildings, carports, or surface parking areas. The site plan provides for pedestrian connections throughout the site with pathways and links between apartment buildings and the onsite amenities. Trash enclosures are also located throughout the site plan in areas located behind the building to minimize visibility from public frontages and traffic conflicts. Access and Circulation The community is designed with two (2) vehicular access driveways. Both access driveways will be non-gated. The Gerald Ford Drive entry is located at the southeast corner of the site and will be shared with the future commercial development on Planning Area 6 of the MSP. The second access is located on the north side of the project on Technology Drive. These proposed locations are consistent with the required project entry points established for the MSP (see Exhibit 10 on MSP page 27). To accommodate vehicular access to the site, Technology Drive will be extended from the current terminus through to Gerald Ford Drive. The intersection of Technology and Gerald Ford is shown in more detail on Sheet 4 of the civil plans. The existing median on Gerald Ford will remain in place, which will limit turn movements at the intersection of Technology Drive to right-turn only. A new right-turn lane will be constructed on westbound Gerald Ford Drive at PP 21-0009 Millennium Apartments Page 4 of 9 December 14, 2021 Technology Drive. A minimum 24’-0” wide drive aisle is provided for internal site circulation and emergency vehicle access. A fire access plan showing the fire lanes and turnarounds is provided on Sheet A1-1 of the plan set. Buildings and Screening The community will consist of 15 three-story residential apartment buildings comprised of three plan types summarized below in Exhibit 2. Summaries for the apartment unit plan types (number of bedrooms) and floor area are provided on Sheet A1.0 of the architecture plan set. Exhibit 2 – Residential Building Summary Plan Type Number of Buildings Number of Units Gross Building Area Roof Line Height Parapet Height (Range) Building A 10 19 Units 24,889 SF 31'-9" 33'-6" to 38'-0" Building B 3 28 Units 37,482 SF 31'-9" 33'-0" to 38'-0" Building C 2 28 Units 39,151 SF 31'-9" 33'-0" to 38'-0" Clubhouse 1 - 5,500 SF 22’-0” - Total 16 330 Units 445,138 SF - - Each of the building plan types will be three-story in height with first-floor walk-up accessibility. Access to the upper floor units will be provided by multiple staircases within an enclosed area of the building. The ground floor of each building will contain attached “tuck-under” garage areas at the rear of the building. Additionally, the ground floor includes utility rooms for screening electrical, gas, and water utilities. The residential buildings feature a flat roof with roof-mounted HVAC screened by a parapet with varying height. The applicant is proposing to cluster the HVAC units on portions of the roof that feature a tall parapet to screen the full height of the equipment and will provide line-of-sight renderings to demonstrate that the units will not be visible from public areas. Parking The 596 spaces provided for parking are generally located throughout the community for ease of access. Parking is provided in the form of attached garages, carports, and open spaces. The design for the carports consists of a metal structure with a sloped metal painted roof, as shown on sheet A2-9 of the architecture plans. Approximately 355 of the spaces provided will be covered. The applicant has requested a reduction in the required parking standard pursuant to the City’s Housing Overlay as they are providing 20% affordable housing. PP 21-0009 Millennium Apartments Page 5 of 9 December 14, 2021 Architecture The proposed architecture style is desert contemporary with elements of 21st Century Modern Decoupage. The architecture of the residential buildings is characterized by box-like forms, which feature multiple wall-cladding textures and materials, large window groupings, and asymmetrical facades. The material palette consists of two (2) textures of stucco and fiber cement wood siding. The changes in wall cladding correspond with changes in building planes. Refer to Sheet A9-0 for the full material board. Additionally, each façade is asymmetrical and features large groupings of windows. The clubhouse will also utilize a contemporary architecture style but is characterized by a single-story pitched gable roof clad with standing seam or corrugated metal panels. The clubhouse will also feature stucco siding and fiber cement siding. Landscaping The proposed landscape includes perimeter roadway frontages, retention areas, and common areas. Shade trees are found throughout the perimeters and internal drive aisles of the site. The proposed landscape plan includes low water usage planting materials including, mixes of desert native species for trees and shrubs. The landscape plan also includes community elements such as a botanical garden, decorative raised planters, hardscape, and landscape lighting. Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive are the public roadways along the perimeter of the project and are proposed to be open with an area of decorative wall panels which will screen open space areas. The landscape palette consists of drought-tolerant 36-inch box Desert Willow, Fruitless Olive, Chilean Mesquite trees, 24-inch She-Oak trees and California and Mediterranean Fan Palms. Also proposed along the perimeter are a mix of low water usage shrubs including, Tecoma Stans, Red Bird of Paradise, New Gold Lantanas, Deer Grass, Bougainvillea, and several other shrubs and accent plants as shown on Sheet L-1 of the landscape plan. The applicant has provided elevations for the enhanced entry features located at the two site entry points. These features will consist of entry signage mounted onto a six-foot (6’-0”) wall with enhanced decorating planters, as shown on Sheet L-23 of the landscape plan. A material palette showing the proposed materials used for site amenities is shown on Sheet L-24 of the landscape plan. ANALYSIS Development Standards The project is subject to the development standards set forth by the Millennium Specific Plan for Planning Area 7 established on Table 5 found on Page 25 of the MSP. The table on page 6 summarizes the project’s conformance with development standards for the MSP. PP 21-0009 Millennium Apartments Page 6 of 9 December 14, 2021 Exhibit 3 – Project Conformance Determination STANDARD PLANNING AREA 7 PROJECT CONFORMS Maximum Density 22 units/acre 22 units/acre Yes Minimum Density 18 units/acre 22 units/acre Yes Front Yard Setback 10’-0” 23’-0” min. (Bldg. 4) Yes Side Yard Setback 8’-0” - N/A Combined side 16’-0” - N/A Street Side Yard Setback 10’-0” 15’-8” min. (Bldg. 15) Yes Rear Yard Setback 10’-0” 30’-3” min. (Bldg. 10) Yes Maximum Lot Coverage 50% 22% Yes Maximum Height 40’-0” 38’-0” Yes Maximum No. of Stories 3 Stories 3 Yes Common Area Open Space per unit 82,500 SF (250 SF/Unit) 288,728 (875 SF/Unit) Yes Parking Section 25.46.040 Parking Requirements of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) establishes that multi-family dwellings require a minimum of two (2) parking spaces per unit. The 330-unit project would require a minimum of 660 on-site parking spaces per this standard. The property is located within the Housing Overlay District, which allows studio and one- bedroom dwelling units to be parked at a ratio of one-and-one-half (1.5) parking spaces per unit. To be eligible for this requirement, the housing development must provide a minimum of 20% of all units within the site at income-restricted rents. The proposal includes 20% income- restricted units and therefore qualifies. Pursuant to the HOD parking reduction, below is a summary of the parking requirement. Exhibit 4 – Project Parking Requirement per HOD UNIT TYPE PARKING RATIO NUMBER OF UNITS PARKING REQUIRED Studio and One Bedroom 1.5 spaces 150 units 225 spaces Two to Three Bedroom 2 spaces 180 units 360 spaces Total - 330 units 585 spaces The project is required to provide 585 on-site parking spaces and provides 596 spaces; therefore, exceeds the minimum parking requirement. The MSP requires a minimum of 50%, or 293 spaces, of all parking to be shaded. The project provides 355 shaded spaces and therefore exceeds the minimum requirement. PP 21-0009 Millennium Apartments Page 7 of 9 December 14, 2021 ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY ARC approval is required for all Precise Plan applications per PDMC Section 25.68.020 (A). Findings for ARC decisions are listed under PDMC Section 25.68.040 – Findings of the ARC. Findings in support of the project are listed below: To approve a design review application, the ARC shall find the following: A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. The proposed development conforms with legally adopted development standards set forth by the Millennium Specific Plan for Planning Area 7. A summary of the conformance with these development standards, including setbacks, lot coverage, building height, open space, and parking is provided on page 6 of this staff report. As summarized, the project conforms will all applicable development standards. The proposed utilities are screened or within the building in accordance with PDMC 25.40.090. Additionally, the project conforms with applicable design standards set forth by the Millennium Specific Plan that require extensive pedestrian connectivity, screening of trash enclosures and utility areas, “L” shaped building arrangements, convenient access to parking, four-sided architectural treatment, and common open space. B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. The proposed project is located along the Gerald Ford Drive corridor, a balanced arterial roadway as defined by the General Plan Circulation Element (Chapter 4, see page 55). Development along this corridor includes a mix of residential densities and housing types including, existing detached single-family residential, attached single- family, and future multi-family uses. The project is located at a transition area between the commercial, hotel, and office uses located near the Cook Street corridor to the east and the existing residential uses further to the west. The project design provides a transition between the areas that creates a stepdown in intensity between residential and commercial areas and therefore does not impair the desirability of investment. The project design features quality architecture, and landscaping and will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the surrounding neighborhood. The density of the proposal is 22 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the zoning designation established by the Millennium Specific Plan, which plans for a maximum of 330 units for Planning Area 7. This density is also consistent General Plan land use designation of Town Center Neighborhood, which allows for 7 to 40 dwelling units per acre. It is not anticipated that the project will generate traffic demand or congestion in excess of the original approval for the MSP or the General Plan Environmental Impact PP 21-0009 Millennium Apartments Page 8 of 9 December 14, 2021 Report. Additionally, the MSP established allowable locations for site access, refer to Exhibit 10 located on page 27 of the MSP. The proposed project access points are consistent with the approved project entry points identified by the MSP and are therefore not expected to create traffic hazards or congestion in accordance with the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the MSP. Additionally, the development will necessitate the extension of Technology Drive, which will improve circulation for surrounding properties in the area. C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the General Plan of the City. The proposed project is compatible with the development pattern within the surrounding area by proposing 330 multi-family dwellings contained within three-story buildings. The property is designated Town Center Neighborhood in the General Plan. Land Use Policy No. 3.21 (Infill Neighborhoods), in existing developed areas, the City encourages development that repairs connectivity, adds destinations, and encourages complete neighborhoods. The proposed project supports the expansion of housing by providing high-quality residential development that is within a vacant property fronting Gerald Ford Drive. The project provides a stepdown in land-use intensity and form from the commercial uses located along the Cook Street corridor, which includes three- and four-story hotels, to the smaller-scale single-family residential located west of the project site towards Portola Avenue. The project is designed with internal pedestrian access and provides common area recreational amenities available to all residents. The proposed project includes local streets, pathways, and open spaces intended to allow residents to enjoy not only the project’s amenities but to connect pedestrians to the existing neighborhoods to the west, east, and south, thereby creating a pedestrian, family-oriented atmosphere. In addition, Land Use Policy 3.3 (Variety of types of neighborhoods) Promote a variety of neighborhoods within the City and ensure that neighborhood types are dispersed throughout the City. The project contains 20% affordable units consisting of 22 moderate-income, 22 low-income, and 22 very-low-income units alongside market-rate housing. The project promotes multifamily residential that is in keeping with the mix of higher and lower densities in the area including, single-story residential developments, which meets the intent of this policy. D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. The proposed design utilizes high-quality finishes and features a quality contemporary design characterized by articulated orthogonal building forms, varying building materials and textures, varying rooflines, balconies, and desert-compatible colors. The buildings will provide for a quality visual aesthetic along Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive. The project also includes extensive on-site landscaping at a rate of PP 21-0009 Millennium Apartments Page 9 of 9 December 14, 2021 875 square feet of open space area per dwelling unit, which is located in central areas for use by all residents of the apartment community. E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. The proposed development conforms with legally adopted development standards set forth by the Millennium Specific Plan for Planning Area 7. A summary of the conformance with these development standards, including setbacks, lot coverage, building height, open space, and parking is provided on page 6 of this staff report. As summarized, the project conforms will all applicable development standards. The proposed utilities are screened or within the building in accordance with PDMC 25.40.090. F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project includes hard surface pedestrian pathways and connections from the public right of way to ensure walkability throughout. The preliminary grading plan has been reviewed to ensure the design of the project incorporates the proper improvements including adequately sized retention basins for onsite drainage. In addition, the overall building design ensures the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the Findings have been met based on the aforementioned analysis and approves the request as presented as a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission. Staff further recommends that modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval. Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits from the Applicant. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOTICE OF ACTION December 29, 2021 Apogee Professional Services 12149 W. Center Road, Omaha, NE 68144 Subject: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan and Environmental Assessment to develop a 330-unit multi-family residential apartment community including 15 three-story apartment buildings, a single- story clubhouse, pool area, and private outdoor recreation areas, and related off-site improvements on a 15-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Gerald Ford Drive and Technology Drive. The Architectural Review Commission of the City of Palm Desert considered your request and took the following action at its meeting of December 14, 2021: By Minute Motion, the Architectural Review Commission approved Case No. PP 21- 0009, subject to the following: 1) Parapets should be of adequate height and carried back/over or enclosed where necessary to ensure roof top equipment and parapet ends are screened in their entirety from all vantage points/angles and provide plans demonstrating this information to Planning staff; 2) Consider alternative locations proposed for artificial turf and the addition of shading elements for these areas or some other method to cool off these surfaces during the hotter months; 3) Consider enhancements to entrances to allow for more prominence with consideration to massing; 4) Revisit placement of mailroom with consideration to high winds experienced in this area; 5) Should project include gas meters, equipment should be fully screened from view and incorporated in the architecture; 6) Redesign roof drainage downspouts so they are internal and placed within the building structure and not visible from the exterior; 7) Revise the design of the stairwell towers and other building offsets by increasing the depth of plane offsets and increasing the window and door recesses; 8) Review state requirements to determine if each garage requires the addition of an entrance/exit door; 9) Review sight line from Cook exit to ensure there is no visible roof top equipment; and 10) Staff will review all revisions made in response to Commissioners comments before the project goes before the Planning Commission; should staff have concern with any revisions and are unable to resolve them with the applicant the project will return to the ARC for review. The motion carried with a 6-0 vote. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within 15 days of the date of the decision. If you have any questions, please contact Associate Planner, Nick Melloni, at (760) 346-0611, Extension 479 or nmelloni@cityofpalmdesert.org. Sincerely, ROSIE LUA, SECRETARY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION cc: File CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Rosie Lua, Planning Manager Date: September 13, 2022 Case No: PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) Subject: Consideration of an Amendment No. 2 to the DSRT SURF project (PP18-0009 and SP/PP21-0002), adding 45 hotel rooms including revisions to the interior layout and exterior architecture of the hotel and surf center facility located at the 17.69-acre site within Desert Willow Golf Resort. BACKGROUND On November 14, 2019, the City Council approved the DSRT SURF Specific Plan (SP), Precise Plan (PP), and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) by Resolution 2019-82 and adopted Resolution No. 2019-83 certifying an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), SCH No. 2019011044, Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program, and adopted a Statement of Overriding Consideration in evaluating potentially adverse environmental impacts. The land use allowances in the Specific Plan included a six-acre surf lagoon, up to 350 hotel rooms, and 88 residential villas. On February 4, 2021, Desert Wave Ventures, LLC, applied for amendments to the approved SP, PP, and TTM, including an addendum to the EIR. The proposed project included a 5.5- acre surf lagoon and surf center facilities, 92 hotel rooms, 83 residential units, circulation, parking, and landscaping on the 17.69-acre site within the Desert Willow Golf Resort, and an off-site parking location in close proximity. On January 27, 2022, the City Council approved the applicant’s request for amendments to the DSRT SURF Project, Resolution No. 2022-09 approving Amendment No. 1 to the SP, Precise Plan, Tentative Tract Map, and a Disposition and Development Agreement for DSRT SURF. On September 2, 2022, Desert Wave Ventures, LLC submitted revisions to the hotel and surf center. The revised plans were prompted by the addition of 45 hotel rooms by inserting a new floor between the third and fourth floors while staying within the same building envelope of the hotel. More specifically, adding the additional floor resulted in a new row of windows and balconies, and changed the visual articulation to the building. The massing and building envelope of the hotel did not change from the originally approved project. Furthermore, the PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) DSRT SURF Page 2 of 10 September 13, 2022 applicant has identified new locations for murals, which have been added to the project as placeholders, pending review by the Cultural Arts Committee. PROJECT SUMMARY A. Property Description: The Project site is approximately 17.69 acres, located on the west side of Desert Willow Drive, north of Country Club Drive, and south of the Desert Willow Clubhouse. The lot is irregularly shaped and is bounded by the Desert Willow golf course on the west, south, and east of the proposed Project. The existing Desert Willow Clubhouse parking lot borders the northern property line. Approximately three (3) acres at the northeast corner of the site are developed with parking lot improvements for the Desert Willow Clubhouse and the remaining fourteen (14) acres of the site were mass graded as part of the Desert Willow development but remain undeveloped. B. Zoning and General Plan Designation: Zone: DSRT SURF Specific Plan General Plan: Resort and Entertainment/Suburban Retail C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: PR - 5 – Desert Willow Clubhouse/parking and golf course (Hole 18) South: PR - 5 – Desert Willow golf course (Hole 15) East: PR - 5 – Desert Willow golf course (Hole 7) West: PR - 5 – The Westin Desert Willow Villas Project Description The project request is an amendment to the architecture for the approved DSRT SURF. The changes are summarized below for the hotel and surf center facility. Hotel: The overall hotel building square footage and proposed height have changed slightly from the approved project. The hotel building exterior has modified in response to interior layout changes and response from market conditions. The following are the interior layout modifications: • Ground floor: o The ground floor space of the lobby, restaurant, bar, and back of house spaces has remained the same. o Relocation of internal Stair #2 by one bay to create room for a suite on the 4th and 5th floors. • Second floor: o The second level of parking has been extended over the back of house area of the hotel to create additional back of house space. o Employee Lounge, restrooms, pool equipment, and administrative offices are located on this mezzanine. PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) DSRT SURF Page 3 of 10 September 13, 2022 • Third floor: o The third level meeting room size has been increased to 2,400 square feet with a 1,000 square foot pre-function space. It incorporated the exterior patio space into the meeting room footprint. This resulted in designing wrap around windows at the meeting rooms overlooking the surf lagoon and patios, creating an indoor-outdoor relationship under the shade of a deep overhang. o The fitness center has been relocated to face onto the pool deck to have connectivity to the pool deck area. o The third level spa has been increased from 1,035 square feet to 1,200 square feet. • Fourth floor: o This floor was added with the same layout and footprint of the typical guest room floor. This new floor added 45 rooms for a total of 137 hotel rooms. • Fifth floor: o The suites at the northwest corner were rotated to provide views and balconies overlooking the surf lagoon. The following are the exterior architecture modifications: East Elevation Changes • Increased row of windows due to increase in the number of rooms in the hotel. • Removal of exterior wall tile and replaced with stucco. • Slight increase in roof elements as part of the revision. • Metal Awnings – Changed metal awning design. • Added Mural (art design is a placeholder). • Balconies added at fourth story on right side. PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) DSRT SURF Page 4 of 10 September 13, 2022 West Elevation Changes • Increased row of windows due to increase in the number of rooms in the hotel. • Removal of exterior wall tile, replaced with stucco. • No roof elements or parapets were increased as part of the revision. • Metal Awnings – Changed metal awning design. • Third story, left side, meeting room expands onto patio. South Elevation Changes • Increased row of windows due to increase in the number of rooms in the hotel. • Reduction of exterior wall tile and replaced with stucco. • Replaced balcony metal rails with glass. • Podium element lowered. PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) DSRT SURF Page 5 of 10 September 13, 2022 North Elevation Changes • Stone removed from right side of garage entry. • Third, fourth, and fifth stories simplified to sand colored single material. • Awnings added and windows aligned. • Suites at fourth and fifth stories rotated to face surf lagoon. • Increased row of windows due to increase in the number rooms in the hotel. • Removal of exterior wall tile, replaced with stucco. • Reduction of stone veneer, replaced with stucco. • Metal Awnings – Changed the metal awning design and added awnings. • Removal of upper balcony area and extended lower balcony area. • Reduction of plane changes due to increased window areas for added keys. • Roof element changes at roof overhang facing surf center. PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) DSRT SURF Page 6 of 10 September 13, 2022 Surf Center The general comments related to the changes to the Surf Center include the following: • Materials were simplified to tie to the hotel. • Colors were generally lightened to tie to the hotel. • The interior received some minor tweaks to the retail and sales counter areas to better accommodate the guest experience on site with beverage and food sales, consumption, and the flow of guest traffic. East Elevation Changes • Removal of wall tile, replace with stucco. • Removal of metal panel and masonry block and replaced with stucco. PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) DSRT SURF Page 7 of 10 September 13, 2022 West Elevation Changes • Removal of wall tile/stone veneer, replace with stucco. • Slight reduction of roof elements as part of the revision. South Elevation Changes • Removal of tall awning and extended lower awning to entry way (storefront includes added windows.) o The canopy was simplified to tie into the building architecture. o The roof over the locker rooms was reduced since that height is not required over the small spaces of the showers, restrooms, and changing areas. • Removal of wall tile, replace with stucco. • Removal of stone veneer and add a tile mosaic/mural design on shower wall area (art design is a placeholder.) PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) DSRT SURF Page 8 of 10 September 13, 2022 North Elevation Changes • Removal of wall tile, replace with stucco. • Removal of metal panel and masonry block and replace with stucco. • The storefront has been expanded to enhance the indoor-outdoor connection. • Left wall has been identified as a possible mural location. PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) DSRT SURF Page 9 of 10 September 13, 2022 ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY The DSRT SURF Specific Plan is the regulatory document for the project site. The proposed revisions to the project require ARC approval. Findings for ARC decisions are listed under PDMC Section 25.68.040 – Findings of the ARC. The design review findings pursuant to Section 25.68.040 are the following: A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. The proposed changes do not affect the project’s conformance with the legally adopted development standards set forth by the DSRT SURF Specific Plan. B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. The proposed modifications do not affect the architectural character of the project or its relationship to existing or proposed development in the area. The changes do not alter the area and massing. The total of 137 hotel rooms is within the land use allowances that review density of development on the site. The proposed exterior modifications will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood and will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and will not create traffic hazards or congestion. C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the General Plan of the City. The architectural modifications to the proposed development do not adversely affect the compatibility of project with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by the DSRT SURF Specific Plan, zoning code, and General Plan. D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. The proposed modifications alter the exterior material palette of the project, however, the design still utilizes high-quality finishes and features a quality contemporary design characterized by articulated building forms, varying building materials and textures, varying rooflines, balconies, and desert compatible colors. PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) DSRT SURF Page 10 of 10 September 13, 2022 E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. The proposed modifications to the project do not affect the project’s conformance with legally adopted development standards set forth by the DSRT SURF Specific Plan. The project conforms with all applicable development standards. F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed modifications consist of exterior material changes and will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. All changes shall be designed to comply with applicable Health and Safety Codes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the Findings have been met based on the analysis and approves the request. Staff further recommends that modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval. Attachment: 1. DSRT SURF – Proposed Changes 2. January 27, 2022, Approved Plans Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 1 2022-09-02 AREIAL VIEW Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 2 2022-09-02 SURF CENTER AREIAL VIEW Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 3 2022-09-02 HOTEL PERSPECTIVE 1 Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 4 2022-09-02 HOTEL PERSPECTIVE 2 Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 5 2022-09-02 HOTEL PERSPECTIVE 3 Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 6 2022-09-02 SURF CENTER PERSPECTIVE Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 7 2022-09-02 HOTEL WEST ELEVATION COMPARISON SCALE: 3/32”=1’ 0 16’32’8’ 01 04 0203 PREVIOUS DESIGN REVISED PROGRAM DESIGN Benjamin Moore - Wind’s Breath Benjamin Moore - Spice Gold Benjamin Moore - Cabot Trail Benjamin Moore - Spanish Brown ELEVATION KEYNOTES 01 02 03 04 Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 8 2022-09-02 HOTEL NORTH ELEVATION COMPARISON SCALE: 3/32”=1’ 0 16’32’8’ 02 03 0104 PREVIOUS DESIGN REVISED PROGRAM DESIGN Benjamin Moore - Wind’s Breath Benjamin Moore - Spice Gold Benjamin Moore - Cabot Trail Benjamin Moore - Spanish Brown ELEVATION KEYNOTES 01 02 03 04 Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 9 2022-09-02 HOTEL EAST ELEVATION COMPARISON SCALE: 3/32”=1’ 0 16’32’8’ 02030104 PREVIOUS DESIGN REVISED PROGRAM DESIGN Benjamin Moore - Wind’s Breath Benjamin Moore - Spice Gold Benjamin Moore - Cabot Trail Benjamin Moore - Spanish Brown ELEVATION KEYNOTES 01 02 03 04 Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 10 2022-09-02 HOTEL SOUTH ELEVATION COMPARISON SCALE: 3/32”=1’ 0 16’32’8’ 02 01 0304 PREVIOUS DESIGN REVISED PROGRAM DESIGN Benjamin Moore - Wind’s Breath Benjamin Moore - Spice Gold Benjamin Moore - Cabot Trail Benjamin Moore - Spanish Brown ELEVATION KEYNOTES 01 02 03 04 Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 11 2022-09-02 SURF CENTER ELEVATION COMPARISON SCALE: 3/32”=1’ 0 16’32’8’ 03 0301 01 010202 PREVIOUS DESIGN WEST ELEVATION PREVIOUS DESIGN SOUTH ELEVATION REVISED PROGRAM DESIGN WEST ELEVATION REVISED PROGRAM DESIGN SOUTH ELEVATION Benjamin Moore - Wind’s Breath Benjamin Moore - Spice Gold Benjamin Moore - Cabot Trail Benjamin Moore - Spanish Brown ELEVATION KEYNOTES 01 02 03 04 Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 12 2022-09-02 SURF CENTER ELEVATION COMPARISON SCALE: 3/32”=1’ 0 16’32’8’ 02 01 0301030102 PREVIOUS DESIGN EAST ELEVATION PREVIOUS DESIGN NORTH ELEVATION REVISED PROGRAM DESIGN EAST ELEVATION REVISED PROGRAM DESIGN NORTH ELEVATION Benjamin Moore - Wind’s Breath Benjamin Moore - Spice Gold Benjamin Moore - Cabot Trail Benjamin Moore - Spanish Brown ELEVATION KEYNOTES 01 02 03 04 Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 13 2022-09-02 STACKED RUBBLE METAL PANEL HORIZONTAL LOUVERS SURF CENTER, HOTEL & MATERIAL PALETTE OCOTILLO PERFORATED METAL PANEL FIXED LOW-E GLAZING STOREFRONT GLAZING GLASS RAILING COMPOSITE WOOD SIDING/CEILING METAL CANOPY MASONRY BLOCK METAL FENCE Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 14 2022-09-02 PAINTED STUCCO Benjamin Moore - Wind’s Breath PAINTED STUCCO Benjamin Moore - Spice Gold PAINTED STUCCO Benjamin Moore - Cabot Trail PAINTED STUCCO Benjamin Moore - Spanish Brown PAINTED STUCCO ACCENT PAINTS - DEEP INKY NAVY / DARK OLIVE SURF CENTER, HOTEL & MATERIAL PALETTE Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 15 2022-09-02 HOTEL PORTE COCHERE LIGHTING RENDERING Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 16 2022-09-02 SURF CENTER ENTRY LIGHTING RENDERING Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 17 2022-09-02 SCALE: 3/32”=1’ 0 16’32’8’ HOTEL ROOF PLAN ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 3’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 3’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 8’-6”ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 8’-6” ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 12’-6”ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 12’-6” ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 3’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 3’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 6’-1”ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 6’-1” ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 10’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 10’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 1’-9”ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 1’-9” ROOFTOP ROOFTOP MECHANICAL MECHANICAL UNIT = 52” UNIT = 52” ROOFTOP ROOFTOP MECHANICAL MECHANICAL UNIT = 52” UNIT = 52” ROOFTOP ROOFTOP MECHANICAL MECHANICAL UNIT = 52” UNIT = 52” ROOFTOP ROOFTOP MECHANICAL MECHANICAL UNIT = 52” UNIT = 52” ROOFTOP ROOFTOP MECHANICAL MECHANICAL UNIT = 52” UNIT = 52” ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 3’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 3’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 9’-6”ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 9’-6” ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 2’-6”ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 2’-6” ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 12’-6”ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 12’-6” ROOF DRAIN, TYPICALROOF DRAIN, TYPICALELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’-6”ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 5’-6”ROOF SLOPE, TYPICALROOF SLOPE, TYPICAL ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 3’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 3’ ROOFTOP ROOFTOP PARAPETPARAPET EXTENSIONEXTENSION ROOFTOP CONDENSING UNITS ROOFTOP CONDENSING UNITS TYPICAL = 52” TYPICAL = 52” 44 LF 26 LF 33 LF 26.5 LF 19.5 LF 15.5 LF Scale Job No. Date DSRT SURF PALM DESERT, CA DESERT WAVE VENTURES, LLC 2020-239 18 2022-09-02 SCALE: 1/8”=1’ 0 16’8’ SURF CENTER ROOF PLAN ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 8’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 8’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 9’-6”ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 9’-6” ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 7’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 7’ ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 4’ELEVATION ABOVE ROOF = 4’ ROOF ACCESS HATCH = 15”ROOF ACCESS HATCH = 15” ROOF DUCTING, TYPICAL = 24” MAX HEIGHTROOF DUCTING, TYPICAL = 24” MAX HEIGHT ROOF DUCTING, TYPICAL = 24” MAX HEIGHTROOF DUCTING, TYPICAL = 24” MAX HEIGHT ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNIT, TYPICAL = 52” HEIGHTROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNIT, TYPICAL = 52” HEIGHT ROOF DRAIN TYPICAL = 12” ABOVE ROOF ROOF DRAIN TYPICAL = 12” ABOVE ROOF CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Senior Planner Date: September 13, 2022 Case No: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 22-0001 Subject: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to construct an unmanned, 65’-0” tall wireless telecommunication facility stealth monopalm within a 562-square-foot lease area, a block wall enclosure containing ground-mounted equipment, and new landscaping located at 39750 Garand Lane (APN 626-410-046). BACKGROUND On January 26, 2022, the applicant Smartlink Group, on behalf of AT&T, applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to develop a new unmanned cell tower, or wireless telecommunication facility (WTF). The project location is within the parking area of the developed 13,546 square foot light- industrial building located at 39-750 Garand Lane (APN 626-410-046). The facility is located at the rear area of the site and setback a minimum of 400’-0” from nearby public streets. The enclosure will replace three (3) existing parking spaces provided for the adjacent light-industrial building. Staff has worked with the applicant on the design of the proposed stealth facility to ensure the design is appropriate for the location and proper screening is incorporated. PROJECT SUMMARY A. Property Description: The project is a developed 0.81-acre site located at 39-750 Garand Lane (APN 626-410-046). The site is developed with a 13,546 square-foot light industrial building, which is part of a four- building industrial complex approved by the City in the early 2000s (See City Council Ordinance No. 904 and Planning Commission Resolution No. 1997 for cases C/Z 98-9 and PP 00-08). The complex is fully developed with related site improvements including parking, drivelines, landscaping, and frontage improvements. A private road runs directly adjacent to the east of the project site, providing reciprocal access between the buildings, and the adjacent Desert Country Plaza retail center to the east. CUP 22-0001 – Smartlink Cell Tower Page 2 of 7 September 13, 2022 The project site is approximately 1.5 miles northwest of the Bermuda Dunes Airport, which is located within the unincorporated Riverside County community of Bermuda Dunes. At this proximity the site is within Compatibility Zone C of the Bermuda Dunes Airport Land Use Combability Plan and must comply with requirements of the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (RCALUC) B. Zoning and General Plan Designation: Zone: SI - Service Industrial, FCOZ - Freeway Commercial Overlay Zone General Plan: Suburban Retail Center C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: PC-2 – District Commercial Center, FCOZ – Personal storage facility South: SI, FCOZ - Light-industrial building East: PC-2, FCOZ – Commercial gym, and retail center (Desert Country Plaza) West: SI, FCOZ - Light-industrial building Project Description The project requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to develop a new cell tower facility in the rear area of an existing industrial development. The project improvement consists of: • 562-square-frry of ground lease area • One (1) new 65’-0” tall WTF stealth facility designed as a palm tree including the following equipment: o Nine (9) panel antennas o Thirty-six (36) remote radio units o One (1) microwave GPS antenna • Ground-mounted equipment: o One (1) power generator o Utility cabinets o Delta Walk Up Cabinets o Other support equipment • 7 foot-4-inch-tall concrete masonry unit (CMU) wall enclosure • Metal shade canopy structure. • Landscaping along the exterior of the CMU enclosure. Site Plan and Parking The facility lease area is proposed in a rear area of the existing parking lot at the eastern edge of the site, shown below in Figure 1. CUP 22-0001 – Smartlink Cell Tower Page 3 of 7 September 13, 2022 Figure 1 - Facility location – See Sheet A-1 of Project Plans This area of the site is developed with three (3) parking spaces, directly south of an enclosed storage yard/parking area, and existing landscape areas. Additionally, there is an existing valley gutter for stormwater drainage near the western edge of the proposed lease area, and a fire hydrant to the south. The three (3) parking spaces will be removed for the development of the facilities. Twenty-seven (27) parking spaces will remain intact for the existing 13,546-square-foot industrial building. Access and Circulation The proposed facility will not impact existing circulation on the site. There are existing private drive- aisles which provide for vehicular circulation throughout the parking area of the industrial complex. These drive-aisles also provide for reciprocal vehicle access between parking areas of the neighboring developments. The proposed facility is located outside of the adjacent drive-lanes and will preserve the full width of these existing improvements by not encroaching upon existing vehicular circulation for parking and emergency vehicles. The facility will be unmanned and will not generate the need for additional parking or circulation modifications. Design and Screening The proposed tower is designed as a date monopalm (a cell tower designed to appear as a Phoenix dactylifera commonly known as a “date palm”). The overall height of the tower will be 65’- 0” from grade level. The centerline of the antenna array will begin at a height of 56’-0” above grade level, with the largest panel antennas extending up to a maximum height of 60’-0”. The faux palm fronds will extend up to 5’-0” above the antenna array and extend out to provide coverage of the equipment. A 2’-0” microwave antenna is mounted below the array on the pole of the tower. Brown CUP 22-0001 – Smartlink Cell Tower Page 4 of 7 September 13, 2022 faux fronds extend 13’-0” below the antenna to simulate the appearance of dead palm fronds and screen the proposed microwave antenna. The tower pole is rounded and clad with a textured material to simulate the appearance of a palm trunk. The ground mounted equipment will be screened by a 7 foot, 4-inch-tall wall enclosure constructed from tan CMU blocks to match existing walls located on the site. A metal shade structure is proposed over a ground-mounted cabinet and will extend above the exterior walls of the enclosure. Access to the enclosure will be available via a metal gate on the west elevation. Figure 2 – Tower East Elevation – See Sheet A-3 of Project Plans Landscaping The applicant will provide new landscape plantings along the southern and eastern elevations of the proposed enclosure. Trees – The applicant will preserve four existing trees located next to the enclosure consisting of: • Two (2) Chilean Mesquite • Two (2) Mexican fan palms Shrubs and Vines – The applicant will provide new shrubs and vines to line perimeter portions of the enclosure which are most visible to parking areas and private drive-aisles, including: • Thirteen (13) – Five (5) Gallon – Compact Texas Ranger • Three (3) – Five (5) Gallon – Cat’s Claw Vine CUP 22-0001 – Smartlink Cell Tower Page 5 of 7 September 13, 2022 ANALYSIS Development Standards The Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) allows WTFs with the approval of a CUP and establishes development and design standards under Section 25.34.130. The Architectural Review Commission’s action is a recommendation to the Planning Commission for the tower design. The development and design standards are intended to minimize the visual impact of towers by establishing allowed zones, maximum height, minimum separation distances between towers, and design guidelines for the tower and support equipment. The facility conforms to PDMC requirements as shown below: *Separation standards may be waived by the commission for stealth design (e.g. artificial palm tree) per PDMC 25.34.130 (O)(2). Additional development standard compliance is provided below: PDMC 25.34.130 (F)(4) – Fencing The project proposes a 7 foot, 4 inch tall wall which does not comply with the minimum height requirement of 8’-0” . Staff has conditioned the applicant to provide an 8’-0” wall to comply with the minimum requirement. PDMC 25.34.130 (F)(5) – Landscaping The project proposes landscape buffers on the east and south perimeters of the wall enclosure by providing hedging shrubs, wall climbing vines, and preserving existing trees. The west elevation cannot be landscaped as the width of the drive lane must be preserved and an existing stormwater drainage gutter must not be altered and limit potential expansion of landscape areas. The north elevation cannot be landscaped as it abuts an existing enclosed storage/parking area. PDMC 25.34.130 (F)(9) – Illumination No illumination of the tower is permitted, except to ensure safety or as required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). No tower illumination is proposed and the RCALUC prohibits certain illumination for a structure of this height in this airport compatibility zone. The project will be conditioned to comply with Chapter 24.16 – Outdoor Lighting of the PDMC and require outdoor lighting to be fully shielded and downward facing. STANDARD REQUIREMENT PROJECT CONFORMS Height 65’-0” maximum 65’-0” Yes Separation between towers 1,000’ minimum 530’-0” Yes* Separation from residential 300’ minimum 685’-0” min. Yes Front Setback - 230’-5” Yes Rear Setback - 71’-4” Yes Interior Side Setback - 10’-5” Yes Street Side Setback - N/A N/A CUP 22-0001 – Smartlink Cell Tower Page 6 of 7 September 13, 2022 PDMC 25.34.130 (K) Signage and advertising. Advertising signage is prohibited. The project complies as no signage is proposed. PDMC 25.34.130 (O)(1) – Stealth Installation Height The height limit of stealth towers isa maximum of 65’-0” with an allowance for faux fronds to exceed 10’-0” above the antenna height. The proposed antennas are 60’-0” above grade, with the faux fronds extending to 65’-0” which complies with this requirement. Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (RCALUC) The project site is within Compatibility Zone C of the Bermuda Dunes Airport Influence Area and required the approval of the RCALUC. The proposed project has received conditional approval from the RCALUC on May 12, 2022. These conditions do not affect the design and will be incorporated into the recorded project approval for Planning Commission. The applicant has incorporated conditions into their project design and obtained FAA clearance on August 17, 2022, and ALUC approval on August 24, 2022. ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY An ARC recommendation to Planning Commission is required for all CUP requests for cell towers Per PDMC 25.34.130. Findings for ARC decisions are listed under PDMC Section 25.34.130 (E) and design standards listed under PDMC 25.34.130, Findings in support of the project are listed below: New freestanding commercial communication towers/commercial communication antennas shall not be allowed unless the applicant substantiates to the satisfaction of the Commission. The ARC shall find the following: 1. That existing towers and buildings do not technologically afford the applicant the ability to provide service to the service area of the applicant or service provider. Existing towers and buildings within the area do not afford the applicant to the ability to provide service coverage to the area. An existing tower is located approximately 530’-0” to the east of the project site at 77850 Country Club Drive behind the Desert Country Plaza center. This tower is currently occupied by another cell carrier. The applicant has stated that collocating on the tower will not afford them the ability to provide adequate coverage to the area due to the need for the antenna arrays to be mounted at a specific height. The existing tower features existing antenna and does not provide enough room to mount additional antennas. Collocating on the tower by adding a second lower additional array would also require modifications to the existing tower which would compromise the existing stealth monopalm design which typically utilizes a single array screened by faux fronds. A second tower is located 730’-0” east of the site, also at Desert Country Plaza. The tower is vacant, and is within a similar area to provide service, however the applicant has reportedly made several attempts to work with the owner of the tower but has been unable to reach an agreement to locate on the tower. It is our assessment that the second tower cannot be utilized. 2. That the geographical boundaries of the proposed service area cannot technologically be bifurcated to avoid the necessity for a freestanding tower/antenna at the height proposed. CUP 22-0001 – Smartlink Cell Tower Page 7 of 7 September 13, 2022 The site was specifically chosen because of the service gap and the need for a new facility in the vicinity. Surrounding areas are a mix of commercial, and light-industrial properties in the immediate vicinity and multi-family residential properties to the south beyond Country Club Drive. The proposed location cannot be bifurcated as other areas in the vicinity are more visible from the public right-of-way and technologically cannot fill in the coverage gaps in the area. Areas further to the east, beyond Washington Street are subject to more restrictive height requirements due to the proximity to the Bermuda Dunes Airport runway. 3. That the applicant shows compelling technological or economic reason(s) for requiring a new freestanding facility. Existing coverage and technology in the area is inadequate for existing customers, while reliance upon and demand for adequate cellular coverage grows. The proposed facility will allow for better service and create a larger network leading to increased capacity according to justifications submitted by the Project applicant. The site selected is located in a rear portion of a light-industrial area, where it is screened by existing buildings, which will limit visibility from highly trafficked areas and public streets. Additionally, the applicant has a documented history of negotiating with existing towers within the area for collocation but has been unable to secure a site and is therefore seeking approval for a new freestanding tower to satisfy the requirements for cellular coverage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on the analysis and approves the request with modifications as a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission: 1. The applicant shall increase the height of the wall enclosure to a minimum of 8’-0”. 2. Modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as a conditions of approval. Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits from the Applicant. 2. RCALUC Approval Letter 3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300,NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660TEL: (949) 387-1265FAX: (949) 387-12751452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 927804430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807T-1SI5&SI5&VICINITY MAPGENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTESAPPROVALSLEGAL DESCRIPTIONTHE FOLLOWING PARTIES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT THESE DOCUMENTS &AUTHORIZE THE SUBCONTRACTOR TO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBEDHEREIN. ALL DOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDINGDEPARTMENT & MAY IMPOSE CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS.DISCIPLINE:SIGNATURE:DATE:AT&T RF ENGINEER:AT&T OPERATIONS:SITE ACQUISITION:CONSTRUCTION MANAGER:PROPERTY OWNER:ZONING VENDOR:PROJECT MANAGER:SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS & EXISTING DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ONTHE JOB SITE & SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANYDISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME.GENERAL NOTESTHE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. A TECHNICIAN WILL VISITTHE SITE AS REQUIRED FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT INANY SIGNIFICANT DISTURBANCE OR EFFECT ON DRAINAGE; NO SANITARY SEWERSERVICE, POTABLE WATER, OR TRASH DISPOSAL IS REQUIRED AND NO COMMERCIALSIGNAGE IS PROPOSED.Your world. DeliveredLOCAL MAPDO NOT SCALE DRAWINGSDRAWING INDEXDRIVING DIRECTIONSPROJECT TEAMCODE COMPLIANCESITE INFORMATION1. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE2. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODEADOPTED 2017 NEC3. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE4. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE5. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE6. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE7. COUNTY COASTAL ZONE LAND USEORDINANCE-TITLE 238. COUNTY FIRE CODE ORDINANCE - TITLE 169. COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE - TITLE 2210.COUNTY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONORDINANCE - TITLE 19ALL WORKS AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCALGOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMITWORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES.CLIENT REPRESENTATIVECOMPANY:SMARTLINK, LLCADDRESS:3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300,CITY,STATE,ZIP:NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660CONTACT:ALEXIS DUNLAPPHONE:(949) 838-7313EMAIL:alexis.dunlap@smartlinkgroup.comSITE ACQUISITIONZONINGENGINEERCOMPANY: CASA INDUSTRIES, INC.ADDRESS: 4430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DCITY,STATE,ZIP: ANAHEIM, CA 92807CONTACT: JULIUS SANTIAGOPHONE: (714) 553-8899EMAIL:JSANTIAGO@CASAIND.COMATT PROJECT MANAGERAPPLICANTRF ENGINEERCOMPANY: AT&TADDRESS: 739 E SANTA CLARA ST.,ROOM 217CITY,STATE,ZIP: VENTURA, CA. 93001CONTACT: SANDEEP MANGATPHONE: (805) 312-1694EMAIL:sm2840@aTT.COMINDOOR EQUIPMENT / WUC ENCLOSUREPROJECT DESCRIPTIONAPPLICANT / LESSEE1452 EDINGER AVE. 3RD FLOORTUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92780Your world. DeliveredLATITUDE:33° 45' 35.74" N (33.759928°)LONGITUDE:116° 18' 23.24" W (-116.306456°)LAT./LONG. TYPE:NAD 83GROUND ELEVATION:112.5' AMSLABOVE GROUND LEVEL:65' A.G.L.APN #:626-41-046AREA OF CONSTRUCTION:±415.25 SQ. FT.ZONING / JURISDICTION:CITY OF PALM DESERTCURRENT ZONING:SERVICE INDUSTRIAL WITH FREEWAY COMMERCIAL OVERLAY ZONEPROPOSED USE:UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITYHANDICAP REQUIREMENTS:FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS NOT REQUIREDGROUND LEASE AREA:562 SQ. FT.AERIAL LEASE AREA:180 SQ. FT.PROPERTY OWNERCOMPANY: AT&TADDRESS: 1452 EDINGER AVE.CITY,STATE,ZIP: TUSTIN, CA. 92780CONTACT: CHRISTIE M. ASARI-PRICEPHONE: (714) 267-3628EMAIL:CH0897@att.comCOMPANY: AT&TADDRESS: 1452 EDINGER AVE.CITY,STATE,ZIP: TUSTIN, CA. 92780CONTACT: CHRISTIE M. ASARI-PRICEPHONE: (714) 267-3628EMAIL:CH0897@att.comOWNER:HERNANDEZ FAMILY TRUSTADDRESS:39750 GARAND LANECITY,STATE,ZIP:PALM DESERT, CA 92211CONTACT:MARIO HERNANDEZPHONE:760-535-4976SITE NUMBER: CSL02434 - NSBSITE NAME: GARANDFA#: 13024049USID#: TBD39750 GARAND LANE,PALM DESERT, CA 92211RIVERSIDE COUNTY············CONSTRUCTION MANAGERCOMPANY:SMARTLINK, LLCADDRESS:3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300CITY,STATE,ZIP:NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660CONTACT:ALISHA STRASHEIMPHONE:(951) 440-0669EMAIL:alisha.strasheim@smartlinkgroup.comCOMPANY:SMARTLINK, LLCADDRESS:3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300,CITY,STATE,ZIP:NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660CONTACT:ALEXIS DUNLAPPHONE:(949) 838-7313EMAIL:alexis.dunlap@smartlinkgroup.comCOMPANY: AT&TADDRESS: 1452 EDINGER AVE.CITY,STATE,ZIP: TUSTIN, CA. 92780CONTACT: CHRISTIE M. ASARI-PRICEPHONE: (714) 267-3628EMAIL:CH0897@att.com 3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300,NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660TEL: (949) 387-1265FAX: (949) 387-12751452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 927804430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807A-11SITE PLAN·10'20' 40'1"=20'-0"SCALE:GARAND LANE ····· 3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300,NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660TEL: (949) 387-1265FAX: (949) 387-12751452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 927804430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807A-23ANTENNA AND RRU SCHEDULE2ANTENNA PLAN3/8"=1'-0"SCALE:1LEASE AREA PLAN3/8"=1'-0"SCALE: 3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300,NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660TEL: (949) 387-1265FAX: (949) 387-12751452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 927804430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807A-31EAST ELEVATION 2SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4"=1'-0"SCALE:1/4"=1'-0"SCALE: 3300 IRVINE AVENUE, SUITE 300,NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660TEL: (949) 387-1265FAX: (949) 387-12751452 EDINGER AVE.TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 927804430 E. MIRALOMA AVE. SUITE DANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92807A-41WEST ELEVATION 2NORTH ELEVATION 1/4"=1'-0"SCALE:1/4"=1'-0"SCALE: Photo Survey and Map Address: CSL02434 – 39750 Garland Lane, Palm Desert, Ca 92211 VIEW LOOKING NORTH VIEW LOOKING WEST VIEW LOOKING EAST MAP OVERVIEW On Behalf of Chris Doheny Wireless Development Specialist 3300 Irvine Ave, Ste 300 Newport Beach, CA 92660 619.994.8528 cellular chris.doheny@smartlinkgroup.co m AT&T Project Number: CSL02434 AT&T Project Name: Garand City of Palm Desert Project Information and Justification AT&T Mobility (AT&T) is requesting approval for the construction and operation of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility (cell site), and presents the following project information for your consideration in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code section 25.34.130: Project Location Address: 39750 Garand Ln, Palm Desert, CA 92211 APN: 626-41-046 Zoning: Service Industrial w Freeway Commercial Overlay Project Description AT&T proposes to construct an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility consisting of a 65 Ft. tall faux “monopalm.” tree. The antennas will be disguised within the branches of the palm tree which will blend nicely with the other trees in the near vicinity. The associated equipment cabinets will be inside lease space and an 7’4” Ft high CMU wall, for security and placed in an unobtrusive section of the property. AT&T will work with the City and the community to install a state-of-the-art stealth faux tree which will provide a benefit to the residents and visitors of the City of Palm Desert. AT&T is submitting an application for consideration of a top height of the proposed Monopalm to be 65 Ft. Top of proposed antennas is 60 Ft., with 5 feet of additional palm coverage. Monopalm Design The new 65 FT. Monopalm design is proposed to be in compliance with wireless code 25.34.130 Communication Towers and Antenna regulations; to minimize adverse visual impacts, to include additional landscape screening and foliage socks colored to blend with palm fronds. The new Monopalm will include 80 Fronds total. Monopalm fronds to extend from 18 inches minimum up to 46 inches beyond the antennas. We reduced the antenna array from 4 antennas per sector to 3 antennas per sector to provide for the additional frond coverage. Monopalm Faux tree bark, textured and colored to match live palm tree. Project Objectives There are several reasons why a wireless carrier requires the installation of a cell site within a specified area to close a “significant gap in coverage:” • The radio signal must be of sufficient strength to achieve consistent, sustainable, and reliable service to customers at a level sufficient for outdoor, in-vehicle, and in-building penetration with good voice quality (Threshold, -76db). • When nearby other sites become overloaded, and more enhanced voice and data services are used (4G and other high-speed data services) signal contracts and a gap is created. With heavy use it is intensified due to the unique properties of digital radio transmissions. In this specific case, this location was selected because AT&T’s radio-frequency engineers (RF) have identified a significant gap in coverage in the vicinity of I-10 and Washington St, in the City of Palm Desert and the surrounding community as demonstrated on the submitted radio-signal propagation maps. Findings/Burden of Proof The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape. AT&T is proposing a mono-palm design for this project which is a stealth design. The requested height of the mono-palm design is the minimum height needed in order to fill the significant gap in coverage for this project. The height restriction for the wireless facilities is 65’. AT&T uses the most advanced technology and design when constructing the mono-palm so as to blend the facility with the surrounding community and landscaping and thereby minimizing the visual impact of the site. The proposed location has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and quality of traffic generated by the proposed use. The access to this site is immediately off Country Club Dr and Washington St. There are adequate access routes directly to the proposed facility. All the roadways and access ways within the facility are in compliance with local, state and federal regulations concerning width and pavement. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties. The project will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties as it is a stealth design that will blend naturally with the subject property and is far away from the residential areas within the ring. The project will provide a public benefit of better wireless telecommunications and data services to the surrounding neighborhoods and community. The proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience or welfare. The new wireless telecommunications facility is in high demand to the residents and visitors of the County of Riverside. Wireless communications are vastly used in this area and the need for this site was established entirely from increased usage of AT&T services in the vicinity of the requested project. GENERAL INFORMATION Location In compliance with wireless code 25.34.130, communications towers may be approved within the zone district of Planned Commercial (PC). AT&T proposed facility is located within a Planned Commercial zone included in the guidelines as preferred. Site Selection Customer demand drives the need for new cell sites. Once the area requiring a new site is identified, a target ring on a map is provided to a real estate professional to begin a search for a suitable location. During an initial reconnaissance, properties for consideration for the installation of a cell site must be located in the general vicinity of the ring, with an appropriate zoning designation, and appear to have enough space to accommodate an antenna structure and the supporting radio equipment. The size of this space will vary depending on the objective of the site. The owners of each prospective location are notified to assess their interest in partnering with AT&T. Four key elements are considered in the selection process: • Leasing: The property must have an owner who is willing to enter into a long-term lease agreement under very specific terms and conditions. • Zoning: It must be suitably zoned in accordance with local land-use codes to allow for a successful permitting process. • Construction: Construction constraints and costs must be reasonable from a business perspective, and the proposed project must be capable of being constructed in accordance with local building codes and safety standards. • RF: It must be strategically located to be able to achieve the RF engineer’s objective to close the significant gap with antennas at a height to clear nearby obstructions. Alternative Site Analysis Other sites considered and approached by Smartlink leasing specialist include the list below and the reasons they were either rejected or unavailable for this project’s facilities. Circle K Gas Station Property, 78005 Country Club Dr. – Original proposed site determined to be a location with high visibility and heavy public traffic and would not blend with trees and existing landscaping or environment. Palm Plaza Club Center properties, Country Club Dr., we attempted to contact via phone call and a proposal letter, copy included, without success or any expression of interest. The plaza was sold to the new owners August 10, 2018 about the time we were trying to reach them. American Tower Monopalm located on Palm Plaza property. Monopalm’s are not suitable for Colocation. While other trees like a monopine or monoeucalyptus are, these designs do not blend well with the local topography and the city will not accept that design. SBA Monopalm located on Palm Plaza property. Per City Code and the extensive discussions between SBA, AT&T, and City last year regarding this location, the SBA monopalm is abandoned and not eligible for colocation. SSCA Storage Facility, 40050 Harris Lane. Several attempts were made to contact the ownership at this property without initial response. We eventually did receive a response after we were already moving forward with plans on the current project. Van Buren Self Storage, 39700 Garand Ln. Several attempts were made to contact the ownership of this property without response. Additional properties and landowners we also contacted without response or interest include, 39750 Garand Ln commercial property, CVWD property (626-410-027), FountainHead Indio (748-380-023), Majid Family Ltd, 78205 Country Club Dr. I have included an overview of our search ring and property lots below to demonstrate the limited space we are working with. We were also limited to the outer edges of the search ring to the west and south due to residential zoning. It is not unusual within a small, dense primarily commercial search ring, that we only get a few responses to work with. Space is limited within the search ring individual properties that would enable this type of project and meet the codes for development, setbacks and separation. AT&T meets all setbacks, separation and height guidelines according to 24.34.130 Communications Tower and Antenna Regulations. We modified our original proposal from 75 Ft to 65 Ft to meet ALUC guidelines. We changed our antennas array from 12 antennas, 4 antennas per sector to 9 antennas, 3 antennas per sector to improve the design and stealth screening of the facility. The separation between the existing American Tower facility and the proposed AT&T facility is 530 Feet as shown on our ZDs. The approximate distance between the American Tower facility and the old SBA/Sprint facility, terminated for service in 2018, is less than 200 Feet. Again, Monopalm facilities do not provide for colocation in regards to height requirement and RF requirements to service all technologies. We improved the overall screening of the facility along with the two existing palms we have included shrubbery and vines around the Monopalm and equipment enclosure. The Benefits to the Community Approximately 90-percent of American adults subscribe to cell phone service. People of all ages rely increasingly on their cell phones to talk, text, send media, and search the Internet for both personal and business reasons. More and more, they are doing these things in their homes, therefore, becoming reliant on adequate service within residential neighborhoods. In fact, 50-percent of people relocating are not signing up for landline service at their new location and are using their cell phone as their primary communication method. The installation and operation of the proposed facility will offer improved: • Communications for local, state, and federal emergency services providers, such as police, fire, paramedics, and other first-responders. • Personal safety and security for community members in an emergency, or when there is an urgent need to reach family members or friends. Safety is the primary reason parents provide cell phones to their children. Currently 25% of all preteens, ages 9 to 12, and 75% of all teens, aged 13 to 19, have cell phones. • Capability of local businesses to better serve their customers. • Opportunity for a city or county to attract businesses to their community for greater economic development. • Enhanced 911 Services (E911) – The FCC mandates that all cell sites have location capability. Effective site geometry within the overall network is needed to achieve accurate location information for mobile users through triangulation with active cell sites. (Over half of all 911 calls are made using mobile phones.) Safety – RF is Radio The FCC regulates RF emissions to ensure public safety. Standards have been set based on peer-reviewed scientific studies and recommendations from a variety of oversight organizations, including the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Federal Drug Administration (FDA), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Although the purview of the public safety of RF emissions by the FCC was established by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, these standards remain under constant scrutiny. All AT&T cell sites operate well below these standards, and the typical urban cell site operates hundreds or even thousands of times below the FCC’s limits for safe exposure. AT&T Company Information AT&T is one of the fastest growing nationwide service providers offering all digital voice, messaging and high-speed data services to nearly 30 million customers in the United States. AT&T is a “telephone corporation”, licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to operate in the 1950.2-1964.8, 1965.2-1969.8 MHz and 1870.2-1884.8-1889.8 MHz frequencies, and a state- regulated Public Utility subject to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). The CPUC has established that the term “telephone corporation” can be extended to wireless carriers, even though they transmit signals without the use of telephone lines. AT&T will operate this facility in full compliance with the regulations and licensing requirements of the FCC, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the CPUC, as governed by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and other applicable laws. The enclosed information is presented for your consideration. AT&T requests approval of the proposed location and design. Please contact me at 619-994-8528 or chris.doheny@smarlinkgroup.com for any questions or requests for additional information. Respectfully submitted, Chris Doheny Chris Doheny, Smartlink Group Authorized Agent for AT&T Project Representative Chris Doheny Smartlink Group 3300 Irvine Ave., S-300, Newport Beach, CA 92660 619-994-8528 cellular chris.doheny@smartlinkgroup.com AT&T Contact Gunjan Malik, Project Manager 1452 Edinger Ave. 3rd Floor Tustin, CA 92780-6246 Gm827w@att.com 562-650-5681 LTE Justification Plots Market Name: Los Angeles Site ID: CSL02434 Site Address: 39750 Garand Lane, Palm Desert CA 92211 ATOLL Plots Completion Date: Jan 05, 2022 Page 2 © 2008 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T is a registered trademark of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. Propagation of the site plots are based on our current Atoll (Design tool) project tool that shows the preferred design of the AT&T 4G-LTE network coverage. The propagation referenced in this package is based on proposed LTE coverage of AT&T users in the surrounding buildings, in vehicles and at street level . For your reference, the scale shown ranges from good to poor coverage with gradual changes in coverage showing best coverage to marginal and finally poor signal levels. The plots shown are based on the following criteria: Existing: Since LTE network modifications are not yet On-Air. The first slide is a snap shot of the area showing the existing site without LTE coverage in the AT&T network. The Planned LTE Coverage with the Referenced Site: Assuming all the planned neighboring sites of the target site are approved by the jurisdiction and the referenced site is also approved and On-Air, the propagation is displayed with the planned legends provided. Without Target site: Assuming all the planned neighboring sites are approved by the jurisdiction and On-Air and the referenced site is Off-Air, the propagation is displayed with the legends provided. Assumptions Page 3 © 2008 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T is a registered trademark of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. LTE Coverage Before site CSL02434 LTE Coverage After site CSL02434 Page 5 LTE Coverage standalone site CSL02434 Coverage Legend In-Building Service:In general, the areas shown in dark green should have the strongest signal strength and be sufficient for most in-building coverage. However, in-building coverage can and will be adversely affected by the thickness/construction type of walls, or your location in the building (i.e., in the basement, in the middle of the building with multiple walls, etc.) In-Transit Service: The areas shown in the yellow should be sufficient for on- street or in-the-open coverage, most in-vehicle coverage and possibly some in-building coverage. Outdoor Service:The areas shown in the purple should have sufficient signal strength for on-street or in-the-open coverage, but may not have it for in- vehicle coverage or in-building coverage. Site Name: GARAND [CSL02434 - NSB] Site Address: 39750 GARAND LANE, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 USID: 309691 FA Location: 13024049 Site Type: MONOPALM Latitude & Longitude: 33.7600620, -116.3064660 Report Date: 01/10/2022 Image to show distance to surrounding buildings on 30’ Grid Report Preparer Pawan Kumar Radio Frequency Emission Compliance Report GCB Services Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary __________________________________________________________________________________ 1 2. Appendix ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 2.1 FCC Limits for MPE ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 2.2 Analysis and Computation ____________________________________________________________________________________ 3 2.3 Compliance Statement ________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 Radio Frequency Emission Compliance Report Page 1 1. Executive Summary AT&T has contracted with GCB Services, an independent Radio Frequency consulting firm, to conduct a Radio Frequency Exposure (RFE) Compliance Assessment of the GARAND [CSL02434 - NSB] cell site. The following report contains a detailed summary of the Radio Frequency environment as it relates to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) Rules and Regulations for all individuals. In this report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. GCB Services has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. It believes this to be a worst-case analysis, based on best available data. Radio Frequency Emissions: Modifications to existing facilities shall submit a completed radio frequency (RF) emissions exposure guidelines checklist contained in Appendix A of the FCC’s “A Local Government Official’s Guide to Transmitting Antenna RF Emission Safety” to determine if the facility is categorically excluded. This report utilizes the following for predictive modeling of the ambient RF environment : MPE Modeling Program: ROOFMASTER 25.8.16.2021 The simulation plots show the spatial predicted power exposure as a percentage of the General Population Standard. Please note that 100% MPE of General Population corresponds to 20% of the Occupational Standard. Proposed Mitigation: On the Monopalm: Install (8” x 12”) Caution Sign 2B on the Monopalm at 9 feet from the ground. Radio Frequency Emission Compliance Report Page 2 2. Appendix 2.1 FCC LIMITS FOR MPE The FCC’s MPE limits are based on exposure limits over a wide range of frequencies recommended by the NCRP and the exposure limits developed by the IEEE and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (”ANSI”) to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. The limits for localized absorption are based on the recommendations of both the ANSI/IEEE and the NCRP. The potential hazard associated with the RF electromagnetic fields is discussed in OET Bulletin No. 65 “Questions and Answers about the Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of RF Electromagnetic Fields”. This document can be obtained on the FCC website at http://www.fcc.gov. Limits for Occupational /Controlled Exposure: Limits for General Population /Uncontrolled Exposure: Radio Frequency Emission Compliance Report Page 3 NOTE 1: Occupational/controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment provided those persons are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Limits for occupational/controlled exposure also apply in situations when an individual is transient through a location where occupational/controlled limits apply provided he or she is made aware of the potential for exposure. NOTE 2: General population/uncontrolled exposures apply in situations in which the general public may be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. 2.2 ANALYSIS AND COMPUTATION Power density is calculated by dividing the surface area of the sphere or the unit area normal to the direction of the propagation. This information is usually shown in units of microwatts per square centimeter (uW/cm2), mill watt per square centimeters (mW/cm2), or watts per square meter (W/m2). Radio Frequency Emission Compliance Report Page 4 2.3 COMPLIANCE STATEMENT AT&T Mobility Compliance Statement: Based on the information collected, AT&T Mobility will be Compliant with FCC Rules and Regulations at the nearest walking surface if recommendations in the Compliance Summary are implemented. Report has been prepared by: PREPARER REVIEWER Pawan Kumar Gyan Sharma RF Associate RF Engineer 20 FT Sector A Sector C Sector B On the Monopalm: Install (8” x 12”) Caution Sign 2B on the Monopalm at 9 feet from the ground. CITY OF PALM DESERTATTENDANCE REPORTAdvisory Body: Prepared By:YearMonthDate 11‐Jan 25‐Jan 8‐Feb 22‐Feb 8‐Mar 22‐Mar 12‐Apr 26‐Apr 10‐May 24‐May 14‐Jun 28‐Jun 12‐Jul 26‐Jul 9‐Aug 23‐Aug 13‐Sep 27‐Sep 11‐Oct 25‐Oct 8‐Nov 22‐Nov 13‐Dec 27‐DecLambell, KarelP P P P‐APPPPPP21Latkovic, Nicholas P P P P‐PPPPPPP‐‐‐P40McAuliffe, Michael P P P P‐PPPAPPP‐‐‐P51McIntosh, James P P P P‐PPAPPPA‐‐‐P62Van Vliet, ChrisP P P P‐PAPP PPP21Vuksic, JohnP P P P‐PPPPPPP‐‐‐P40Colvard, Dean WallaceP00Sanchez, Francisco00Palm Desert Municipal Code 2.34.010:PPresentAAbsentEExcused‐No meeting2022 2022 2022 2022 2022Total AbsencesOctNovDecArchitectural Review CommissionM. Gonzalez2022 2022Twice Monthly: Six unexcused absences from regular meetings in any twelve‐month period shall constitute an automatic resignation of members holding office on boards that meet twice monthly.Total Unexcused AbsencesJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep2022 20222022 2022 2022