HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-10-11 ARC Regular Meeting Agenda Packet
City of Palm Desert Page 1
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
AGENDA
(HYBRID MEETING)
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference and there
will be no in-person public access to the meeting location.
• To participate via Zoom, use the following link: https://palmdesert.zoom.us/j/83648797515,
Zoom Webinar ID: 836 4879 7515.
• To participate by telephone call (213) 338-8477 or (669) 219-2599, Zoom Webinar ID: 836
4879 7515. To provide a public comment please press *9 to raise your hand.
• Written public comment may also be submitted to planning@cityofpalmdesert.org. Emails
received by 9:30 a.m. prior to the meeting will be distributed to the Commission. Any
correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Commission as
soon as practicable and retained for the official record. Emails will not be read aloud except
as an ADA accommodation.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: This time has been set aside for the public to address
the Architectural Review Commission on issues that are not on the agenda for up to three
minutes. Because the Brown Act does not allow the Commission to act on items not listed on
the agenda, members may briefly respond or refer the matter to staff for a report and
recommendation at a future meeting.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine
and may be approved by one motion. The public may comment on any items on the Consent
Agenda within the three-minute time limit. Individual items may be removed by Commissioners
for a separate discussion.
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Architectural Review Commission Regular Meeting
minutes of September 27, 2022.
Tuesday
October 11, 2022
12:30 p.m.
Regular Meeting
Architectural Review Commission Agenda October 11, 2022
City of Palm Desert Page 2
5. ACTION CALENDAR
A. FINAL DRAWINGS
1. CASE NO: MISC22-0019
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request
for a design review of a façade modification of an existing retail storefront located at
73425 El Paseo, Suite 116.
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: John Henry III, Phoenix, AZ 85022
LOCATION: 73425 El Paseo, Suite 116
ZONE: D.O. (Downtown Core Overlay District)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Architectural Review Commission (ARC) finds the project satisfies all
requirements for design review approval and approves the project as presented.
2. Any modification required by the ARC be added to the motion as a condition of
approval.
2. CASE NO: MISC22-0020
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request
for a design review of a private sport court on a residential property located at 45710
Verba Santa Drive.
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Richard Leventhal, Palm Desert, CA 92260
LOCATION: 45710 Verba Santa Drive
ZONE: R-1, 20,000 (Single Family Residential)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Architectural Review Commission approves Case No. MISC22-0019 based
on staff’s analysis of the required design standards with staff recommended
conditions of approval.
2. The applicant shall provide permanent irrigation for the proposed hedges
surrounding the sport court.
3. The hedges shall be maintained at a height of 8’-0” in perpetuity, or until the sport
court is removed.
4. Lighting is not included as a part of this approval. If lighting is proposed at a future
date, the applicant shall submit a new permit application to the Planning Division
subject to review by the ARC. The lighting shall comply with any outdoor lighting
requirements in place at the time of application. The design shall consider impacts
on adjacent residents and shall incorporate mitigation measures to screen any
outdoor lighting sources.
5. Any modification required by the ARC be added to the motion as a condition of
approval.
Architectural Review Commission Agenda October 11, 2022
City of Palm Desert Page 3
3. CASE NOS: PP/CUP22-0006
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a
recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan,
Conditional Use Permit, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration to construct a 394-unit
market-rate multifamily community consisting of thirteen three-story apartment
buildings, a two-story fitness center, a single-story clubhouse, two (2) pool areas, and
private outdoor recreation areas on an 18.67-acre site located at the southwest
corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue (APNs: 620-400-030 and 620-400-
031).
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Hayes Dietrich, LLC, Edina, MN 55436
LOCATION: SW Corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue
ZONE: PR-22 (Planned Residential – 22 dwellings per acre)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. The ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met
based on staff’s analysis and approves a recommendation to the Planning
Commission for approval of the Precise Plan application.
2. Modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of
approval.
B. MISCELLANEOUS
None
6. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS
A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONERS
B. CITY STAFF
C. ATTENDANCE REPORT
7. ADJOURNMENT: The next Regular Meeting will be held on October 25, 2022, at 12:30 p.m.
Architectural Review Commission Agenda October 11, 2022
City of Palm Desert Page 4
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing agenda for the Architectural Review Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin
board and City website not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting.
Melinda Gonzalez
Recording Secretary
PUBLIC NOTICES
Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated
office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Development Services
Department, City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda
items and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public
inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.cityofpalmdesert.org.
Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at
this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what
is normally provided, the city will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner.
Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the
meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible.
City of Palm Desert Page 1
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
(HYBRID MEETING)
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting was conducted by teleconference and there
was no in-person public access to the meeting location.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission was called to order by Chair
Vuksic on Tuesday, September 27, 2022, at 12:30 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Dean Wallace Colvard, Nicholas Latkovic, Michael McAuliffe,
Francisco Sanchez, and Chair John Vuksic.
Absent: Vice Chair Jim McIntosh.
City Staff
Present: Chris Escobedo, Assistant City Manager/Director of Development Services;
Richard Cannone, Deputy Director of Development Services; Rosie Lua, Planning
Manager; Nick Melloni, Senior Planner, and Melinda Gonzalez, Recording
Secretary, were present at Roll Call.
3. NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT:
Chair Vuksic opened and closed the non-agenda public comment period. No public
comments were provided.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be
viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at,
https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission-
information.
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE,
CARRIED 5-0, to approve the consent calendar. (VICE CHAIR MCINTOSH ABSENT)
Tuesday
September 27, 2022
12:30 p.m.
Regular Meeting
Architectural Review Commission Minutes September 27, 2022
City of Palm Desert Page 2
ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER
MCAULIFFE, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Architectural Review Commission Regular
Meeting minutes of September 13, 2022. (VICE CHAIR MCINTOSH ABSENT)
CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER: Items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
discussion will be considered at this time.
None
5. ACTION CALENDAR
Associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be
viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at,
https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission-
information.
A. FINAL DRAWINGS
1. CASE NO: MISC 22-0014
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a wall setback
exception to the City of Palm Desert Fence and Wall Ordinance for a five-foot, six-inch
(5’-6”) tall decorative block wall with breeze block accents at a setback of twelve feet
from the face of curb.
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Stacey Harding, Palm Desert, CA 92260
LOCATION: 45420 Abronia Trail
ZONE: Multifamily Residential (R-3)
Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the item and
responded to Commission inquiries. Stacey Harding, Applicant, and Tim Turner,
Landscape Architect, presented additional details on the project and answered
questions from the Commission.
Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and
concerns for the project. Chair Vuksic opened and closed the public comment period.
No public comments were provided.
Following discussion, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY
COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, CARRIED 5-0 (VICE CHAIR MCINTOSH ABSENT),
to:
1. Approve Case No. MISC22-0014 design as presented with conditions.
2. Applicant must incorporate outward swinging safety gate with self-latching lock
which complies with applicable building codes and safety requirements.
3. The artificial turf installation, and wall footings must be coordinated to appropriately
accommodate existing Washingtonia Filifera.
Architectural Review Commission Minutes September 27, 2022
City of Palm Desert Page 3
ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
B. MISCELLANEOUS
None
6. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS
A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONERS
Commissioner Colvard provided an update on the Cultural Arts Committee and shared
pictures of a mural and sculpture which are proposed along San Pablo via Zoom.
Commissioner Colvard stated the City donated $25,000 to Desert X 2023, with two art
installation sites designated in the City of Palm Desert, locations to be determined. The
City also purchased the sculpture “Anza Borrego” for $20,000 which will be installed at
the Magnesia Falls roundabout.
In response to inquiry, Planning Manager Lua explained the Consent Calendar including
how it works and the types of cases which will be placed under the Consent Calendar.
B. CITY STAFF
Planning Manager Lua reported at the City Council meeting scheduled for September 29,
2022, City Council will consider staff’s request to reduce the ARC’s membership count
from nine members to seven members. If approved, it will require a second reading which
will include a thirty-day waiting period. There is an application for a seventh ARC member
which is currently under review. As previously discussed, a study session will be
scheduled for ARC members, however, the date has not been set to allow coordination
for attendance of the potential seventh ARC member.
C. ATTENDANCE REPORT
The attendance report was provided with the agenda materials. The Commission took no
action on this matter.
7. ADJOURNMENT
The Architectural Review Commission adjourned at 1:11 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Melinda Gonzalez, Senior Administrative Assistant
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Rosie Lua, Planning Manager
Secretary
APPROVED BY ARC: __/__/2022
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission
From: Nick Melloni, Senior Planner
Date: October 11, 2022
Subject: MISC22-0019 – Façade Update for Travis Mathew at 73425 El Paseo
Project Summary
The project applicant, John Henry III (Applicant), is requesting design review approval for a façade
remodel to an existing storefront located at 73425 El Paseo, Suite 116. The request is for Travis
Mathew, a retail store specializing in golf accessories and clothing, that will occupy the entire
space. The storefront has El Paseo frontage located at the El Paseo Village shopping
development.
The project will include the demolition of a portion of the existing retail storefront to construct the
new storefront. The new storefront will include:
• Larger window store frontage for display of merchandise.
• Addition of a new horizontal slat composite storefront wood system for the exterior siding.
This new storefront is recessed 1 foot, 3 inches from the existing neutral pier.
• Addition of a new storefront canopy awning, which will extend 2’-0” from the proposed
fascia.
No changes are proposed to the rear or side elevations, nor the existing floor area of the building.
Interior modifications to the floor plan are shown for reference. Exterior wall signage is shown on
the plans for reference but will be approved through a separate staff action with a sign permit
application.
Zoning Ordinance Summary
The subject property is zoned Downtown Core Overlay District (D.O.) which allows retail
stores as a permitted use. Revisions to storefront facades are subject to review and
approval of a design review by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) pursuant to
Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.68.020 (A)(2). Findings for ARC
decisions of design review applications are listed under Palm Desert PDMC Section
25.68.040 as follows:
A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development
standards.
Page 1 of 5
The proposed project is in conformance with the legally adopted development
standards set forth by the PDMC for the DO zoning district. The existing structure
is in conformance with all applicable development standards including height,
coverage, and parking. The proposed project will not create non-conforming
conditions for this existing development. The DO zone establishes design
guidelines for buildings to incorporate shopfronts with elements such as storefront
windows, canopy awnings, and large glazing. The project incorporates each of
these elements and satisfies the standards.
B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to
neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not
impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it
will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing
or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion.
The proposed design is compatible with surrounding developments and will not
create additional traffic which would impair investment in the neighborhood. The
proposed use is a retail use that will replace a former retail use, therefore, a
substantial increase in traffic generation is not anticipated. The existing building
provides for future tenants to propose unique or branded storefronts which utilize
a mix of exterior building materials with an existing neutral pier system.
C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the
harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the
General Plan of the City.
The proposed façade is compatible with the development pattern along El Paseo
as it provides a retail storefront within a walkable pedestrian-oriented district. The
land use designation is City Center/Downtown in the General Plan which promotes
high intensity mixed-use development anchored by civic, cultural, entertainment,
and retail activity. The intended built form and character for this district consists of
buildings at or near the sidewalk to support easy view of storefronts.
D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a
desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is
aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors.
The proposed project utilizes a good composition of new materials, textures, and
colors for quality visual aesthetics, enhancing the front entry with consideration of
the compatibility to the existing building. Other storefronts within the existing
building utilize unique storefronts featuring a mix of design elements and building
materials, which are unified by a continuous building envelope which utilizes a
continuous mass, form, and materiality.
Page 2 of 5
E.That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is
located and all other applicable requirements.
The proposed project conforms with legally adopted development standards set
forth by the Downtown Core Overlay District.
F.That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection
of public health, safety, and general welfare.
The proposed project did not modify the originally designed site plan which
included hard surface pedestrian pathways and connections from the public right-
of-way. In addition, the overall building design does not present any adverse
impacts to the protection of public health, safety, and general welfare.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the Architectural Review Commission find the project satisfies all requirements
for design review approval and approves the project as presented.
Staff further recommends that any modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as
a condition of approval.
Attachments: 1. Plans Submitted by Applicant
Page 3 of 5
Page 4 of 5
Page 5 of 5
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission
From: Nick Melloni, Senior Planner
Date: October 11, 2022
Subject: MISC22-0020 – 45710 Verba Santa Drive – Levanthal Private Sport Court
Project Summary
The applicant, Rick Levanthal (Applicant), is requesting design review approval for a private sport
court located in the rear yard of a single-family residence located at 45710 Verba Santa Drive.
The sport court will be used for pickleball and is 20’-0” wide by 44’-0” long. No lighting is proposed
for the court area. The court area includes landscape screening adjoining the neighboring
properties with 15-gallon Ficus trees. Sport courts are subject to review and approval by the
Architectural Review Commission (ARC) pursuant to Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC)
Section 25.40.070.
Earlier this year, the sport court was construction without City approval and is the subject of an
open Code Compliance case. A decision by the ARC is required to resolve the code compliance
case and make a final determination of the use. As required by the PDMC, staff has mailed a
courtesy notice of the ARC meeting to property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
Zoning Ordinance Summary
The subject property is zoned R-1, 20,000, a zoning designation primarily intended for traditional
residential neighborhoods. Private sport court facilities are permitted within residential areas
pursuant to the PDMC which requires ARC approval for all new tennis/sport courts subject to
design requirements listed under PDMC 25.40.070:
1. A minimum 10-foot setback shall apply from side and rear property lines, and a minimum
20-foot setback shall apply to the front property line.
Complies: The proposed sport court is setback a minimum of 11’-0” from the side yard
property line (north) and a minimum of 10’-6” from the rear property line (east) and
therefore complies with this standard. The court is located entirely within the rear yard of
the property in an area that is greater than 20’-0” from the front property line.
2. No more than 1 tennis court and 1 sports court for each residential parcel of land unless
a conditional use permit in accordance with PDMC Section 25.72.050 is approved by the
Commission.
Page 1 of 17
Complies: The applicant has proposed one (1) pickleball court which complies with this
requirement and does not require a Conditional Use Permit.
3. Private tennis courts/sports courts shall not be used for commercial purposes and shall
be used only by the property owner and guests or tenants of the property owners.
Complies: The application for the proposed project, provided a statement from the
applicant regarding the use. The applicant stated that the pickleball court will only be
used by the property owner, their guests, and potential tenants of the owners. No
commercial use is proposed and therefore, the proposal complies with this requirement.
4. All tennis courts/sports courts fencing shall not exceed 10 feet in height as measured
from the elevation at the adjacent property line and shall be screened from public view
and adjacent property with a combination of walls, berms and landscaping.
Complies: The project does not propose to install or construct additional fencing to
enclose the sport court. The perimeter of the site is enclosed by an existing 6’-0” block
wall. The applicant will install a new Ficus tree hedge along the northern and eastern
property wall to visually enclose the space, provide screening, and to mitigate potential
noise from the pickleball court.
5. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be provided for review and approval by the ARC.
Complies: The applicant has provided a landscape plan for review by the ARC. The plan
proposes to plant fifteen (15) new 15-gallon Ficus shrubs, spaced every 24 inches to 30
inches along the north and east property lines. Additionally, the proposal will add six (6)
new Dwarf Olives to provide additional hedging between the court and the existing
carport on site. To ensure the hedge is maintained in perpetuity, staff recommends
conditioning the project to provide a permanent irrigation system which complies with
design standards set by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD).
6. If the proposal for a private tennis court/sports court includes the provision of lighting for
night play, the owner/applicant shall provide fully engineered lighting plan pursuant to
the provisions of Chapter 24.16, Outdoor Lighting Requirements.
Not applicable: The proposal does not include lighting for night play. The applicant
provided a statement indicating they do not intend to use the court after 7:00 PM or at
night and therefore require no lighting. Staff recommends conditioning that if lighting is
proposed at a future time, the applicant shall provide a photometric site plan and return
to ARC for review.
7. If the tennis/sports court is depressed at least 4 feet below the existing grade or the fence
is no more than 6 feet above the adjacent grade then the court may be located to within
5 feet of the side and rear property lines.
Not applicable: The court is level with the average grade of the home and property. No
fence is proposed. The applicant has provided a setback of 10’ in compliance with the
requirements of PDMC 25.40.070 (1).
Page 2 of 17
8. Design and orientation of sports courts may be subject to ARC review to ensure minimum
impacts on adjacent properties.
Complies: The court has been designed to ensure minimal impacts on neighboring
properties including impacts associated with screening, lighting, noise, and regular play.
The location of the court complies with the minimum setback requirements established
for new sport courts. A new landscape hedge will be planted to screen the court and
provide a buffer for noise and a barrier for errant pickleballs from impacting neighboring
yards. The applicant is not proposing lighting to avoid potential glare impacts caused by
lighting for night-time play. The court will be used during hours between 7:00 AM and
7:00 PM, which will limit potential impacts caused by noise.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends conditional approval of the proposed sport court based on staff’s analysis of
the required design standards for this court pursuant to PDMC 25.40.070. Staff recommends the
following conditions be incorporated:
1. The applicant shall provide permanent irrigation for the proposed hedges surrounding the
sport court.
2. The hedges shall be maintained at a height of 8’-0” in perpetuity, or until the sport court is
removed.
3. Lighting is not included as a part of this approval. If lighting is proposed at a future date,
the applicant shall submit a new permit application to the Planning Division subject to
review by the ARC. The lighting shall comply with any outdoor lighting requirements in
place at the time of application. The design shall consider impacts on adjacent residents
and shall incorporate mitigation measures to screen any outdoor lighting sources.
4. Any modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as a condition of approval.
Attachments:
1. Plans Submitted by Applicant
2. Courtesy Public Notice dated September 30, 2022
3. Applicant Narrative dated September 29, 2022
Page 3 of 17
9'
6' 7"
5' 6"
4'
7'
3'
3'
12'
22'
4'
17' 2"17' 2"
7' 1"
4'
8'
SETBACK BETWEEN BBQ /
3'2'2'
7'
3'
2' 6"
4'
11'
11'
SETBACK
SETBACK
SETBACKSETBACK
15 GALLON FICUS PLACED
EVERY 24" TO 30" APART
15 GALLON FICUS PLACED
EVERY 24" TO 30" APART
OLEA "LITTLE OLLIE"
DWARF OLIVE 3' TO 4' TALL
GRASS
CARPORT STRUCTURE
DRIVEWAY
EXISTING HOME
PUTTING GREEN
Page 4 of 17
Page 5 of 17
CITY OF PALM DESERT
CASE NO. MISC 22-0020
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Development Services Department has received a request
for a private sport court in the rear yard of a single-family residence located at 45710 Verba Santa
Drive. The Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) allows private sport courts on residential
properties subject to approval by the Palm Desert Architectural Review Commission (ARC)
pursuant to PDMC 25.40.070.
This notice is being sent to you as a courtesy of the hearing, based on your property’s proximity to
the proposed wall exception. The proposed wall exception is scheduled for consideration by the
City’s Architectural Review Commission on Tuesday, October 11, 2022, at 12:30 p.m. via Zoom
meeting. The agenda for this meeting is available on the City of Palm Desert website at:
https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission-information
Should you have any questions, comments or would like to participate in the meeting, please
contact Mr. Nick Melloni, Senior Planner, by October 10, 2022, at (760) 776-6479, between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
September 30, 2022 Rosie Lua
Planning Manager
Page 6 of 17
1
Anna Dan
From:Nick Melloni
Sent:Friday, September 30, 2022 8:45 AM
To:Anna Dan
Subject:FW: Pickleball Court Noise Mitigation Proposal
Attachments:We sent you safe versions of your files; LEVENTHAL RESIDENCE DETAILS.pdf; IMG_3885 3.HEIC
Anna,
Please create a project entry for this application and plans on TRAKiT.
Nick Melloni
Senior Planner
Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6479
nmelloni@cityofpalmdesert.org
From: Rick Leventhal <rick.leventhal@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 5:50 PM
To: Nick Melloni <nmelloni@cityofpalmdesert.org>; Rosie Lua <rlua@cityofpalmdesert.org>; Kevin Swartz
<kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org>; RICK LEVENTHAL <rickkellybiz@gmail.com>
Subject: Pickleball Court Noise Mitigation Proposal
Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files.
To All Concerned,
Attached you'll find a diagram of our
backyard with our proposed hedge
to help mitigate noise from our
pickleball court.
Page 7 of 17
2
Based on my discussion with an
arborist at Mollers Garden Center in
Palm Desert, our proposal is to plant
6‐7 foot ficus trees (15 gal) 2 to 2
1/2 feet apart along the long
wall/long (east) side of the court at
the rear of our property and along
the short end of the court closest to
the wall at the far (north) end of our
property, in an "L" shape (as shown
on the attached diagram).
The nursery typically suggests the
hedge trees be planted 3 feet apart
but we will install them closer
together, at 2 to 2 1/2 feet, to insure
Page 8 of 17
3
a quicker more effective sound
proofing solution.
We'd then like to put a shorter
hedge of 3‐4 foot tall (15 gal) Olea
"Little Ollie" dwarf olive trees (as
shown in the photo below) along the
other long side of the court, 2 feet
apart, from the edge of the ficus
hedge to the edge of the putting
green (the north half of the court),
between the court and the
natural grass lawn we already
installed. These are beautiful and
expensive trees but we think it will
be a wise investment since they will
Page 9 of 17
4
catch most of the sound without
blocking the views.
We believe putting a hedge along
the rest of the west side and south
end of the court isn't necessary
because the sound on the west side
will be redirected and mitigated by
the new olive hedge, existing
carport and our house, and any
noise that makes it past the bar area
will be mitigated by the much taller
existing wall along the south
property line past the pool, which
stands close to 9 feet tall.
Page 10 of 17
5
We also spent a considerable
amount of time, energy and money
on the putting green and turf along
the south end of the court, which is
integral to the concept, use and
design of our property and we
absolutely do not want to tear that
up.
Our goal is to satisfy the city's
request while maintaining and even
increasing the beauty of our
incredible backyard, without
sacrificing all of the planning and
significant financial investment
Page 11 of 17
6
we've spent making our home an
absolute showpiece.
The other attached photos show
some of the new turf and putting
green we installed, the existing
hedge on our side of the wall to be
replaced by ficus, and the significant
existing hedge on our back
neighbor's property that should
double the sound proofing our new
ficus will provide.
I can provide more images on
request.
Page 12 of 17
7
Some other important notes:
As I mentioned before, the
representative from Ferrandell
Tennis Courts, who installed our
Pickleball Court, specifically told me
when I asked that we did NOT need
a permit to install it. He said we
only needed a permit if we wanted
lights. If he'd known the rules,
which he should've, we wouldn't be
in this position now.
We are NOT asking for a permit for
lights.
Page 13 of 17
8
We will NOT allow play at night.
We're willing to limit play hours to
between 7a & 7p daily and will
remind anyone who plays to respect
our neighbors and keep
conversation at an indoor level.
We hope these rules and hedge
installations will satisfy the city. We
love Palm Desert and plan to use
this home for the rest of our
lives! We look forward to planting
and playing without disturbing our
neighbors.
Page 14 of 17
9
Sincerely,
Rick Leventhal
Page 15 of 17
10 Page 16 of 17
11
Page 17 of 17
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission
From: Nick Melloni, Senior Planner
Date: October 11, 2022
Case No: PP/CUP 22-0006
Subject: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for
approval of a Precise Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and a Mitigated Negative
Declaration to construct a 394-unit market-rate multifamily community
consisting of thirteen three-story apartment buildings, a two-story fitness
center, a single-story clubhouse, two (2) pool areas, and private outdoor
recreation areas on an 18.67-acre site located at the southwest corner of
Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue (APNs: 620-400-030 and 620-400-
031).
BACKGROUND
On May 11, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-66 approving a 159 single-
family unit residential project known as Catavina (PP 05-25 and TT 33719) on the 18.67-
acre project site. Conditions of the approved entitlement have since expired and are no
longer valid.
On June 28, 2022, the project appeared before the Architectural Review Commission
(ARC) as a non-action item. The Commission took no formal action on the project, but
provided design feedback and comments to the Applicant to consider incorporating into
the project design:
• Provide more recess on windows.
• All roof and ground mounted utilities should be fully screened.
• Revisit multi-family building design elements including but not limited to,
repetitive patterns, flat facades, break up large massing; details such as
mansard roof and large bare areas of façades.
• Consider use of architectural elements to overlap vertical sections of multi -
family building to blend sections and create more horizontal play.
• Increase setback of three-story residential buildings from street fronts.
Page 1 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 2 of 14
October 11, 2022
• Revisit use of three different design styles for project; consider incorporating
design elements/principles of the clubhouse to the other buil dings for
coherence between all building types.
A table summarizing the responses by the applicant is provided under the Project
Description beginning on page 3.
On August 23, 2022, the project appeared before the ARC, however due to lack of a
quorum could not be heard and was rescheduled to a future date.
On September 1, 2022, City staff held a community meeting open to Palm Desert residents
to discuss the history of the General Plan adoption in 2016, the subsequent 2017 zoning
consistency update, and the proposed project. Resident attendees of the meeting voice d
concerns over the project’s location and height in relation to surrounding existing
communities.
Following these meetings, staff directed the applicant to address public comments on the
project raised prior to the ARC meeting in written comments, and community engagement
meetings held by the applicant and City staff. These comments includ ed concerns over
modifications to the surrounding area, sight lines, traffic, and parking. The applicant
provided an extensive response to these comments which are provided in the signed letter
dated October 3, 2022, attached to this staff report. Additionally, the applicant has provided
additional renderings to illustrate how the proposed project will fit into the existing context
of the surrounding area.
PROJECT SUMMARY
A. Property Description:
The project site is a vacant 18.67-acre property and undeveloped (APNs: 620-400-030
and 620-400-031). The project’s northern boundary is delineated by Frank Sinatra
Drive which is a fully developed road with curb and gutter. The eastern boundary is
delineated by Portola Avenue which is a fully developed road with curb and gutter. The
western boundary is delineated by combination transmission and distribution power
poles and a Southern California Edison dirt-road easement, as well as two
maintenance buildings and associated parking lot at the southwest corner of the
project. Residential single-family neighborhoods are located north of the project and
Desert Willow Golf Resort and the Retreat at Desert Willow Condominiums are located
to the east. West of the site is an approximately 80-acre vacant property.
Page 2 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 3 of 14
October 11, 2022
B. Zoning, General Plan and Adjacent Uses:
Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations
Existing Uses General Plan Zoning
Project
Site
Vacant Town Center
Neighborhood (TCN) 7-
40 Dwelling Units Per
Acre
Planned Residential –
22 dwelling units per
acre (PR-22)
North Single-family
Residential
Conventional Suburban
Neighborhood (CSN)
PR-5
South Vacant TCN PR-22
East Single-family
Residential
Condominiums
Resort & Entertainment PR-8
West Vacant TCN PR-22
In 2016, the City of Palm Desert adopted a comprehensive update of the General Plan
which changed this property’s land use designation to Town Center Neighborhood
which allows for seven (7) to forty (40) dwelling units per acre (du/acre). On June 22,
2017, the City Council approved a subsequent Citywide Zoning Update (ZOA 17 -105)
which included this property and increased the density from Planned Residential (PR-
9), nine (9) du/acre to Planned Residential (PR-22), 22 du/acre.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Description
The applicant, (Hayes Dietrich, LLC), is requesting a Precise Plan (PP) and Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) to develop a gated community of 394-unit market-rate apartments on a
18.67-acre vacant site located at the southwest corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola
Avenue.
Section 25.10.030 Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements Table 25.10 -1 Use Matrix
for Residential Districts states that multifamily dwellings require a CUP for land use
compatibility.
The proposed project includes the following:
• Eleven (11) three-story walk-up residential buildings.
• One (1) three-story residential building with elevators and an underground parking
garage.
• One (1) single-story 17,311 square-foot clubhouse building consisting of a movie
theater, pet spa, game room, coffee bar, and clubroom.
• One (1) two-story 4,602 square-foot fitness building.
• Two (2) outdoor swimming pools.
• One (1) basin for onsite stormwater retention.
Page 3 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 4 of 14
October 11, 2022
• 816 onsite parking spaces with 659 spaces provided at the surface and 157 within
an underground parking garage.
• Outdoor amenities include grilling stations, fire pits, yoga lawn, putting green, bocce
ball, and community park.
The proposal includes an alternative site plan which will require a separate approval from
planning commission. The alternative proposal provides 672 on -site parking spaces at a
parking ration of 1.71 spaces per unit in order to provide additional community open space
amenities including a dog run south of Building 10 and park amenity between Building 8
and Building 9.
Design Changes
After the June 28th meeting, the applicant implemented several changes to the project
design as summarized on the following pages:
Table 2 – ARC Design Response
ARC Comment Design Response
Provide more recess on windows. The applicant has designed windows to recess
between 8” and 10” throughout the plan where
there is no balcony patio. The image below is
a detail provided by the applicant showing the
recess.
All roof and ground mounted utilities should
be fully screened.
The roof equipment is fully screened by a
parapet. The roof plan shows the height of the
equipment and parapets. Building utilities are
shown within the building where they are
enclosed within rooms. The image below
shows an example of the roof top screening.
Page 4 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 5 of 14
October 11, 2022
Revisit multi-family building design elements
including but not limited to, repetitive patterns,
flat facades, break up large massing; details
such as mansard roof and large bare areas of
façades.
The applicant has changed the architectural
style of the development. The proposal will
feature a more desert contemporary style of
architecture characterized by flat roofs with a
varied parapet.
Consider use of architectural elements to
overlap vertical sections of multi-family building
to blend sections and create more horizontal
play.
The applicant has revised the plan to
incorporate additional pop outs to break up
vertical sections of the plan and provide
additional horizontal articulation and break up
wall massing.
Increase setback of three-story residential
buildings from street fronts.
The applicant has provided variation in the
setback with some buildings achieving a 45’-
0”+ setback to provide relief. The Planned
Residential zone requires a minimum 20’-0
setback along perimeter street frontages. The
project complies with the minimum required
setback.
Page 5 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 6 of 14
October 11, 2022
Revisit use of three different design styles
for project; consider incorporating design
elements/principles of the clubhouse to the
other buildings for coherence between all
building types.
The applicant has revised the architecture
design to reflect contemporary with modern
elements. This design ensures the community
buildings are consistent with the architecture
of the residential buildings. The image below
shows a comparison of the changes.
Site Plan
The Portola Avenue frontage is lined with seven (7) apartment buildings with varying
setbacks with a parking lot located at the south end of the site and parking area between
Buildings 8 and 9 on the south end of the site. Buildings are generally oriented to provide
access to the units directly from the parking areas. Parking areas are generally screened
from public view by the apartment buildings and a combination block wall with wrought
iron fence for the edge condition.
The corner of the site (Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive) has a large open space
area that will be fully landscaped. Frank Sinatra Drive is lined with three (3) three -story
Page 6 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 7 of 14
October 11, 2022
buildings and directly south is a “L”-shaped three-story building with underground parking.
The central portion of the site has two (2) three-story buildings, a single-story clubhouse,
a two-story fitness center, and two (2) swimming pools.
Figure 1 – Site Plan
Access and Circulation
The gated community is designed with three (3) vehicular access driveways including
Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive. The primary vehicular entrance is located along
Portola Avenue at the center of the site (approximately 790 feet south of Frank Sinatra
Drive).
There are two (2) secondary access points. The first secondary access point is located
along Portola Avenue at the southern portion of the site, the second is located along Frank
Sinatra Drive at the western portion of the site.
Applicable restrictions for all access points are listed below:
• Primary access (Portola Avenue) – Northbound left-in via median and southbound
right-in and right-out.
• Secondary access (Portola Avenue) – Southbound right-out.
• Secondary access (Frank Sinatra Drive) – Westbound right-out. A resident traveling
eastbound would make a U-turn at the intersection of Frank Sinatra Drive and
Portola Avenue.
Page 7 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 8 of 14
October 11, 2022
The site plan provides pedestrian connections throughout the site with pathways and links
between apartment buildings and onsite amenities. Trash enclosures are al so located
throughout the project within the parking areas behind the buildings to minimize visibility
from public frontages and traffic conflicts.
The project includes a six-foot high combination wall consisting of block and wrought iron
around the perimeter of the project, metal gates at the entries, and a monument sign
located on the corner of Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive.
Parking
The project provides 816 parking spaces throughout the community, including 157 below
surface parking spaces. Approximately 285 of the surface spaces will be covered. The
design for the carports consists of metal as shown on the architecture plans. The
remaining parking spaces are uncovered spaces. The project also includes an alternative
site plan showing reduced parking ratio alternatives of 672 parking spaces, 741 parking
spaces, and 768 parking spaces to demonstrate parking plans with reduced parking
rations which are intended to improve the project by providing additional open space
amenities.
Architecture
The architecture for the residential buildings provides a contemporary style which is
complimentary to the surrounding desert environment. The style is characterized by
overhangs and trellises, balconies and patios, horizontal and varying wall planes, large
window groupings, and a desert color palette with natural stone wall facades.
The architecture of the 12 walk-up buildings includes light stucco masses at the corners
that are defined by lighter colors and recessed windows. The darker stucco masses and
chimney elements vary the roof line and screen all rooftop mechanical equipment. The
one (1) central multifamily building also uses lighter colors at the corners, however,
implements an overhang along the top level and incorporates deeper window recesses
along the bottom floors. The center sections of the building have a similar character to the
perimeter walk-up buildings using slender stone walls at the balconies and patios.
The architecture of the amenity buildings is proposed with a desert modernism style with
long overhangs and butterfly roof elements that compliments the proposed residential
buildings.
Page 8 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 9 of 14
October 11, 2022
Buildings and Screening
Table 3 – Building Summary
Building
Type
Number of
Buildings
Number of
Stories
Gross Floor
Area
Roof Line
Height
Walk-up 12 3 380,472 33 to 37 feet
Multi-family 1 3 191,928
33 to 36 feet
(tower elements
at 40 feet
Fitness Center 1 2 4,602 33 feet
Clubhouse 1 1 17,311 18 to 27 feet
Below is a breakdown of the bedrooms for the 394 units:
• Studio 35
• One Bedroom 176
• Two Bedroom 171
• Three Bedroom 12
The applicant is proposing roof-mounted HVAC units, which are screened by a
continuous parapet. Utility rooms for additional screening are provided at the ends of
the ground floor of each residential building.
Landscaping
The proposed landscaping includes perimeter roadway frontages, retention areas, and
common areas. Shade trees are located on the perimeter and internal drive aisles of the
site. The proposed landscape plan has a low and moderate water usage planting material
palette with mixes of desert native species for trees and shrubs.
The project includes the use of trees throughout the project. The perimeter of the site,
open space amenities, areas between the buildings, and retention basin are lined with 48-
inch box Desert Museum trees and 36-inch box Acacia Aneura trees and Prosopis Phoenix
trees, and 24-inch Acacia Salincina trees.
Also proposed throughout the project are a mix of low water usage five -gallon (5) shrubs,
including Agave Americana, Agave Weberi, Dasylirion Wheeleri, Acacia Redolens,
Muhlenbergia Capillaris, Leucophyllum Candidum, St. Elmo’s Fire, Bougainvillea, and
several other shrubs and accent plants as shown on the landscape plan.
The primary entrance off Portola Avenue includes a series of Date Palms.
A material palette showing the proposed materials used for si te amenities is also shown
on the landscape plan.
Page 9 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 10 of 14
October 11, 2022
Community Engagement
Per Section 25.60.060, the applicant must provide adequate community engagement
efforts since the project site is more than five (5) acres. The applicant has held two (2)
neighborhood meetings on April 25, 2022, via Zoom, and August 3, 2022, in-person at the
Retreat at Desert Willow’s clubhouse. The applicant mailed flyers to residents within 1,000
feet of the project to invite residents to the meetings.
At the April 25, 2022, zoom meeting, there were approximately fifteen (15) residents in
attendance from the Retreat at Desert Willow. The applicant presented the project and
many of the residents voiced concerns regarding density (too many units) and building
heights (three-story). Many of the residents stated that they were unaware that the
property allowed up to 22 units per acre and building heights up to 40 feet. The residents
requested for the applicant to provide line of sight studies and look for ways to preserve
mountain views.
After the April 25, 2022, zoom meeting, staff and the applicant discuss ed the residents’
comments. The applicant agreed to relocate one of the three story buildings along Portola
Avenue to the rear and replace it with an open space amenity area. Having the open space
amenity area along Portola Avenue preserves some views for the residents at the Retreat
at Desert Willow.
At the August 3, 2022, community in-person meeting, there were seventeen (17) residents
in attendance and approximately six (6) additional via Zoom. Most of the residents were
from the Retreat at Desert Willow and a few from the single-family neighborhood to the
north along Pele Place. The applicant presented the project including line of sight studies,
the new site plan, and updated architecture. The residents voiced the same concerns with
density (too many units) and building heights (three-story). The residents and applicant
discussed rents and the residents were happy that it was a market rate project.
The meeting concluded with a few residents stating that the City needs to reexamine the
density and building heights for the surrounding area because its taking away from the
Palm Desert resort atmosphere.
ANALYSIS
Development Standards
The proposed development complies with all setbacks (front, rear, and side yards),
building height, lot coverage, and parking requirements of the Planned Residential (PR)
zone. The proposed development standards are analyzed for conformance below:
Page 10 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 11 of 14
October 11, 2022
PR-22 zone development standards:
Table 4 – Project Conformance Summary
STANDARD PR-22 ZONE PROJECT CONFORMS
Height 40’-0” 33’ to 37’ (tower
elements 40’) Yes
Front Setback - 20’ to 46’ Yes
Rear Setback - 24’ to 60’ Yes
Street Side Setback - 22’ Yes
Parking 788 Onsite Spaces 816 Onsite Spaces Yes
Density:
The PR zone allows a minimum of four (4) du/ac and a max of forty (40) du/ac pursuant to
PDMC, Table 25.10-3. The zone allows for a maximum density of twenty-two (22) du/ac,
and the project is requesting twenty-two (22) du/ac, which is within the threshold of the PR
zone allowance.
Height:
The PR zone allows for three-story buildings up to a maximum height of 40 feet pursuant
to Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.10.050(B)(11). The three-story
buildings vary in roof heights between 33 feet and 37 feet with tower elements at 40 feet
which is permitted by the zoning ordinance.
Parking:
Section 25.46.040 Parking Requirements of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC)
establishes that multi-family dwellings require a minimum of two (2) parking spaces per
unit. The 394-unit project would require a minimum of 788 onsite parking spaces per this
standard. The project is proposing 816 parking spaces which meets the minimum parking
requirement.
ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY
ARC approval is required for all Precise Plan applications per PDMC Section 25.68.020
(A). Findings for ARC decisions are listed under PDMC Section 25.68.040 – Findings of
the ARC. Findings for the project are listed below:
To approve a design review application, the ARC shall find the following:
A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development
standards.
Page 11 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 12 of 14
October 11, 2022
The proposed development complies with all setbacks (front, rear, and side yards),
lot coverage, and parking requirements of the PR zone. Specifically to heights, PR
allows for a building height of 40 feet. The three-story buildings vary in roof heights
between 33 feet and 37 feet with tower elements at 40 feet, w hich complies with
the zoning standards.
B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relat ionship to
neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not
impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it
will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring exi sting
or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion.
The proposed project is located along the Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive
corridors which are balanced arterial roadways as defined by the General Plan
Circulation Element (Chapter 4, see page 55). Development along this corridor
includes a mix of residential densities and housing types including , existing
detached single-family residential and multifamily uses. To the east is a vacant site
approximately 80 acres that allows up to 22 du/ac. Directly kitty-corner to the site is
a vacant 170 acres that has a specific plan. The specific plan designates the corner
for both Neighborhood Low (4-8 du/ac) and Neighborhood Medium (7-24 du/ac).
The density of the proposal is 22 du/ac, which is consistent with the PR-22 zoning
designation. This density is also consistent with the General Plan land use
designation of Town Center Neighborhood which allows for 7 to 40 du/ac. The
project includes a traffic study and it is anticipated the project will not generate traffic
demand or congestion for the area.
C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the
harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the
General Plan of the City.
The proposed project is compatible with the existing development pattern within the
surrounding area and with the zoning designations for the surrounding vacant sites.
The property is designated Town Center Neighborhood in the General Plan. Land
Use Policy No. 3.21 (Infill Neighborhoods), in existing developed areas, the City
encourages development that repairs connectivity, adds destinations, and
encourages complete neighborhoods. The project is designed with internal
pedestrian access and provides common area recreational amenities available to
all onsite residents (tenants). The proposed project includes private streets,
pathways, and open spaces intended to allow residents (tenants) to enjoy the
project’s amenities, while being able to connect to public pathways, thereby creating
a pedestrian and family-oriented atmosphere.
In addition, Land Use Policy 3.3 (Variety of types of neighborhoods) Promote a
variety of neighborhoods within the City and ensure that neighborhood types are
Page 12 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 13 of 14
October 11, 2022
dispersed throughout the City. The existing homes in the area are a for sale product
and the proposed project supports the expansion of housing by providing a for rent
development within the City. The project promotes multifamily residential that is in
keeping with the mix of higher and lower densities in the area including, single-story
residential developments, which meets the intent of this policy.
D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a
desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors , and that it is
aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors.
The proposed design for the residential buildings features a contemporary style
including modern overhangs and trellises, balconies and patios, horizontal and
varying wall planes, large window groupings, and a desert color palette with natural
stone walls. The architecture of the amenity buildings takes on a desert modernism
style with long overhangs and butterfly roof elements. The project also includes
extensive onsite landscaping and open space areas which are located in central
areas for use by all tenants of the apartment community.
E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is
located and all other applicable requirements.
The PR zone permits multi-family use through a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The
project as proposed at 22 units per acre conforms to all development standards of
the PR zone. A summary of the conformance with these development standards,
including setbacks, building height, and parking is provided in the analysis table on
page 11 of this staff report. As summarized, the project conforms with all applicable
development standards.
F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection
of the public health, safety, and general welfare.
The proposed project includes hard surface pedestrian pathways and connections
from the public right of way to ensure walkability throughout. All engineering
documents including the preliminary grading plan and water quality management
plan are under review to ensure the design of the project incorporates the proper
improvements including adequately sized retention basins for onsite drainage. In
addition, the overall building design ensures the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been
met based on the aforementioned analysis and approves a recommendation to the
Planning Commission for approval of the Precise Plan application . Staff further
Page 13 of 100
PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue
Page 14 of 14
October 11, 2022
recommends that modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions
of approval.
Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits from Applicant
2. Statement Letter from Applicant
3. Letters in Opposition for the project
Page 14 of 100
PROJECT LOCATION
Vicinity
Site Location
FRANK SINATRA RD
PORTOLA AVEPROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:24 PMA0
TITLE SHEET
221570
ESG ESG
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
FRANK SINATRA DRIVE & PORTOLA - LAND USE SUBMITTAL
DRAWING INDEXPROJECT TEAM
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
ARCHITECT:
CIVIL ENGINEER:
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
LEGAL:
Hayes Dietrich, LLC
5021 Vernon Ave. S, Suite 201
Edina, MN 55436
Contact: Cody Dietrich
Ph: 507-440-5702
Elness Swenson Graham Architects Inc.
500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Contact: Christine Pecard
Ph: 612-339-5508
Fx: 612-339-5382
MSA Consulting
34200 Bob Hope Drive
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Contact: Mike Rowe
Ph: 760-320-9811
MSA Consulting
34200 Bob Hope Drive
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Contact: Mike Rowe
Ph: 760-320-9811
Hayes Dietrich Construction, LLC
5021 Vernon Ave S, Suite 201
Edina, MN 55436
Contact: Calvin Hayes
Phone: 612-202-1934
Nethery/ Mueller/ Olivier, LLP
41-750 Rancho Las Palmas, Bldg. H
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Contact: Daniel E. Oliver
Phone: 760-837-0333
DRAWING INDEX ARC
DRAWING
NUMBER DRAWING NAME
GENERAL INFORMATION
A0 TITLE SHEET
A1 PROJECT METRICS
CIVIL
C1 TECHNICAL SITE PLAN
C2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
C3 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
LANDSCAPE
L1 OVERALL TREE PLAN
L2 ENTRY ENLARGEMENT
L3 FITNESS AREA ENLARGEMENT
L4 DESERT GARDEN ENLARGEMENT
L5 MAIN POOL ENLARGEMENT
L6 PLANT PALETTE-SHRUBS
ARCHITECTURAL
A3 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE A
A4 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE A
A5 COLORED ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE A
A6 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE B
A7 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE B
A8 COLORED ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE B
A9 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE C
A10 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE C
A11 COLORED ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE C
A12 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE D
A13 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE D
A13.1 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE D
A14 COLORED ELEVATIONS - RESIDENTIAL TYPE D
A15 LEVEL P1 - MULTIFAMILY BUILDNG
A16 LEVEL 1 - MULTIFAMILY BULDING
A17 LEVEL 2 & 3 - MULTIFAMILY BUILDNG
A18 UNIT PLANS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
A19 UNIT PLANS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
A20 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - MULTIFAMILY
A21 COLORED ELEVATIONS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
A22 COLORED ELEVATIONS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
A23 ROOF PLAN - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
A24 CLUB HOUSE BUILDING & POOL TERRACE PLAN
A25 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - CLUBHOUSE
A26 COLORED ELEVATIONS - CLUBHOUSE
A27 COLORED ELEVATIONS - CLUBHOUSE
DRAWING INDEX ARC
DRAWING
NUMBER DRAWING NAME
A28 FITNESS BUILDING & TERRACE
A30 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - FITNESS
A31 COLORED ELEVATIONS - FITNESS
A32 SITE SECTIONS
A33 GARAGE, CARPORT, & TRASH ENCLOSURE PLANS
A34 SITE SIGNAGE & FENCE SECTION ELEVATIONS
A35 MATERIAL BOARD
A36 VIEW FROM INTERSECTION AT FRANK SINATRA +
PORTOLA
A37 VIEW OF COMPLEX ENTRY FROM PORTOLA AVE
A38 VIEW OF CLUBHOUSE
A39 VIEW OF POOL AT FITNESS CLUBHOUSE
A40 VIEW OF WALK-UP UNITS
A41 VIEW OF ENTRANCE AT MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING
A42 VIEW OF MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING
A43 VIEW FROM PORTOLA AVE
A44 VIEW FROM FRANK SINATRA
A45 VIEW OF PARK ALONG PORTOLA
A46 VIEW ALONG PORTOLA AVE
A47 VIEW OF MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING
A48 STREET VIEW ALONG FRANK SINATRA DR
A49 STREET VIEW ALONG PORTOLA AVE
A50 VIEW OF TRASH ENCLOSURE AND GARAGE
A51 MISC DETAILS
A52 MISC DETAILS
A53 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCUALTIONS - TYPE A, B
BUILDINGS
A54 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCULATIONS - TYPE C, D
BUILDINGS
A55 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCUALTIONS - TYPE E
BUILDING
A56 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCUALTIONS - TYPE F & G
BUILDINGS
ELECTRICAL
E1 SITE PHOTOMETRICS
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 15 of 100
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:24 PMA1
PROJECT METRICS
221570
Author Checker
05/09/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Unit Type Count %BED
Studio 16 4%16
Alcove 19 5%19
1 Bedroom 176 45%176
2 Bedroom 171 43%342
3 Bedroom 12 3%36
Total Units 589394
Building Unit Type Unit Count/Building Total Unit Count Unit Area Total Area
E M1 16 16 620 9,920
E A1 19 19 690 13,110
E B1 15 15 799 11,985
A B2 12 60 824 -
D B2 12 12 824 59,328
E B3 14 14 856 11,984
B B4 12 36 865 31,140
C B5 12 36 863 31,068
E B6 3 3 943 2,829
E C1 13 13 1,233 16,029
C C2 12 36 1,220 43,920
B C3 12 36 1,290 46,440
E C4 6 6 1,405 8,430
E C5 3 3 1,405 4,215
E C6 3 3 1,396 4,188
A C7 12 60 1,385 -
D C7 6 6 1,385 91,410
E C8 5 5 1,427 7,135
D C9 3 3 1,850 5,550
E D2 12 12 1,679 20,148
394 418,829
Residential Building Totals
UNITS
Site Metrics
Area (GSF)Dus/Building Total Parking
# Buildings Level P1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total/Building Total Area Standard Carport Garage Underground
Site 263 256 140
Building A 5
Circulation (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138
Residential 8,836 8,836 8,836 24 120
Balcony/Patio (Exterior)750 750 750
10,724 10,724 10,724 32,172 160,860
Building B 3
Circulation (Exterior)1,471 1,471 1,471
Residential 8,620 8,620 8,620 24 72
Balcony/Patio (Exterior)742 742 742
10,833 10,833 10,833 32,499 97,497
Building C 3
Common (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138
Residential 8,332 8,332 8,332 24 72
Balcony/Patio (Exterior)830 830 830
10,300 10,300 10,300 30,900 92,700
Building D 1
Circulation (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138
Residential 7,917 7,917 7,917 21 21
Balcony/Patio (Exterior)750 750 750
9,805 9,805 9,805 29,415 29,415
Building E (Multifamily)1
Common Circulation 2,931 8,247 5,937 5,937
Residential 33,125 38,424 38,424 109 109
Amenity 407 2,989
Parking 55,507 157
Total (Interior)58,845 44,361 44,361 44,361 191,928 191,928
Balcony/Patio (Exterior)3,302 3,302 3,302
Building F (Clubhouse)1 17,311
17,311 17,311
Building G (Fitness)1 2,553 2,049
4,602 4,602
15 594,313 394 816
2.07
Total Stalls
Parking Ratio
Page 16 of 100
NOPARKINGNO
PARKING
NO
PARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING
FRANK SINATRA DRIVE PROP. BUILDING 1TYPE "C"10,300 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,300 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,300 SF (3RD FLOOR)30,900 SF (TOTAL)EX. C/L PROP. BUILDING 2TYPE "C"10,300 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,300 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,300 SF (3RD FLOOR)30,900 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 3TYPE "C"10,300 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,300 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,300 SF (3RD FLOOR)30,900 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 4TYPE "B"10,833 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,833 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,833 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,499 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 5TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 6TYPE "B"10,833 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,833 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,833 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,499 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 7TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 8TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 9TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 10TYPE "B"10,833 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,833 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,833 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,499 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 11TYPE "D"9,819 SF (1ST FLOOR)9,819 SF (2ND FLOOR)9,819 SF (3RD FLOOR)29,457 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 12TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 13TYPE "E"44,361 SF (1ST FLOOR)44,361 SF (2ND FLOOR)44,361 SF (3RD FLOOR)133,083 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 14LEASING / CLUBHOUSE17,311 SFPROP.BUILDING 15FITNESS2,553 SF (1ST FLR)2,049 SF (2ND FLR)4,602 SF (TOTAL)32.8'43.7'45.1'42.8'31.4'33.2'34.5'
17.8'20.5'30.5'20.5'16.2'18'30'18'PoolSpaYogaLawnPool2
1
.
8
'
1
8
'
3
2
'
EX. CURB & GUTTER
11.5'
22.8'
63'
20'
32.6'
46.3'
10.9'18'
13.9'55.6'309.6'17'20.5'74.1'14.9'20.5'45.1
'23.6'30.6'24'10'24'29.1'PRO
P
.
E
N
T
R
Y
KIOS
K
16'18'30.5'20.5'EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY& LOT LINE (TYP.)30'30'
18'20.4'18'30'20.5'26.9'23'
23'
20'
26'20.5'26.4'18'
30'
18'
22.8
'
24'EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY& LOT LINE (TYP.)EX. C/L (TYP.)PROP. SIGNAGEPROP. PROJECT BOUNDARY& R/W (TYP.)EX. C/L (TYP.)29'29'PORTOLA AVENUEN 27°46'33" E 840.48'N 01°21'56" E 1923.00'N 89°52'08" E 686.08'N 04°19'04" E 58.45'=23°27'29" R=1937.00' L=793.05'=11°29'14" R=1863.00' L=373.51'75'117.2'
59.4'21.6'21.6'21.6'18'23.1'
9'
TYP.
18'
29.4'
30'
20.5'
39.8'68.1'19.5'20.5'30'20.5'21.9'22'18'18'21.4'15.2'
18'
30'81.2'60.3'20.5'10'PROP. LANDSCAPEPARKWAY (TYP.)10'PROP. LANDSCAPEPARKWAY (TYP.)PROP. LANDSCAPEPARKWAY (TYP.)10'EX. PROPERTIES TO BE MERGEDWITH FINAL DESIGN PLANSPROP. PROPERTY FENCE PER LANDSCAPE &ARCHITECTURE PLANS (TYP.)PROP. PROPERTY FENCE PER LANDSCAPE &ARCHITECTURE PLANS (TYP.)24' WIDE “ALL-WEATHER SURFACE” MADEUP OF A COMBINATION OF CONCRETE &TURF BLOCK ABLE TO WITHSTAND A FULLYLOADED FIRE VEHICLE TO THE SATISFACTIONAND APPROVAL OF THE FIRE MARSHALL18'24' WIDE “ALL-WEATHER SURFACE” MADE UP OF A COMBINATIONOF CONCRETE & TURF BLOCK ABLE TO WITHSTAND A FULLY LOADEDFIRE VEHICLE TO THE SATISFACTION AND APPROVAL OF THE FIRE MARSHALL20.5'30.5'20.5'
117.5'38.9'144.2'30'17'
15'
18'
30'
18'
6'
18'
30'
18'62.5'PROP. GENERAL EGRESS ACCESS ONLY.GATES WILL NOT SWING INTO EGRESS(TYP.)PROP. GENERAL EGRESS ACCESS ONLY.GATES WILL NOT SWINGINTO EGRESS (TYP.)
13.9'
13.5'
13.6'
13.7
'
13.7
'
13.9
'
13.9'14.1'EX. CURB &GUTTER (TYP.)EX. CURB &GUTTER (TYP.)EX. CURB &GUTTER (TYP.)PROP. PROJECT BOUNDARY& R/W (TYP.)PROP. GARAGE (TYP.)PROP. GARAGE (TYP.)PROP. GARAGE (TYP.)PROP. CARPORT (TYP.)PROP. CARPORT (TYP.)PROP. CARPORT (TYP.)PROP. CARPORT (TYP.)PROP.CARPORT (TYP.)PROP.CARPORT (TYP.)32'17.8'PROP.GARAGE(TYP.)N 47°57'11" W29.27'Putting GreenMSA CONSULTING, INC.Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape ArchitecturePlanning Environmental Services Dry Utility Coordination GIS34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 | 760.320.9811 | MSAConsultinginc.comEASTNORTHSOUTHWESTCENTERLINEEASEMENTEXISTING(E)(N)(S)(W)C/LESMT.EX.ABBREVIATIONSACREAGEACCURB AND GUTTERC&GASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERAPNE/P EDGE OF PAVEMENTA.C. ASPHALT CONCRETEMAX. MAXIMUMBOUNDARYBNDRYM.B. MAP BOOKEXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONEEXISTING SEWEREXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED CURBPROPOSED EASEMENTEXISTING PROJECT BOUNDARYEXISTING SEWER FORCE MAINEXISTING WATERPROPOSED LOT LINEPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINEPROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARYEXISTING IRRIGATIONEXISTING GASEXISTING EASEMENTEXISTING ELECTRICEXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINEEXISTING CABLEEXISTING CONTOURSEXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONSLEGENDEXISTING LOT LINEEXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENTEXISTING TELEPHONEMIN. MINIMUMNUMBERPROPOSEDRIGHT OF WAYTYPICALNO.PROP.R/WTYP.P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTSF SQUARE FEETRADIUSRSTANDARDSTD.P/L PROPERTY LINEN.T.S. NOT TO SCALER-L LOW DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL)UG UNDERGROUNDOVERHEADO/HOPEN SPACE / PARKSOS/PPPAGEPG.PROPOSED PARKING STALLSXCUP SITE PLANDATA TABLEASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS:620-400-030 & -031EXHIBIT DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2022SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY:ADDRESS:INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY:DECEMBER 22, 2021EXHIBIT PREPARER:ADDRESS:MSA CONSULTING, INC.34200 BOB HOPE DRIVERANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270CONTACT:PAUL DEPALATIS, AICPTELEPHONE:(760) 320-9811REVISIONSNO. DATEIN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIALEGAL DESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTIONA PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST,SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.TELEPHONE:(951) 687-4252APPLICANT /ADDRESS:CONTACT:5021 VERNON AVENUE, SUITE 201EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436CALVIN HAYESHAYES DIETRICH, LLCLAND OWNER:EXISTING GROSS ACREAGELAND USE DESCRIPTION:AMENITY LANDSCAPE AREAS0.96 AC.41,666 SF5%TOTAL BUILDING AREA (GROUND FLOOR AREA)4.40 AC.191,203 SF24%8.41 AC.366,248 SF47%GARAGES, ACCESS ROADS, HARDSCAPE & PARKING18.31 AC.ACREAGE797,567 SFSF-PERCENTAGE- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "A" (5, 7-9 & 12)- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "B" (4, 6 & 10)53,760 SF32,499 SF1.23 AC.0.75 AC.--DATA TABLE (CONTINUED)EXISTING ZONING:PROPOSED ZONING:EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, 22 DU/AC. (P.R.-22)PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, 22 DU/AC. (P.R.-22)TOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOODTOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOODBUILDING DESCRIPTION:STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "A" (BUILDING NO(S). 5, 7, 8, 9 & 12)3 STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "B" (BUILDING NO(S). 4, 6 & 10)3 STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "C" (BUILDING NO(S). 1-3)3 STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "D" (BUILDING NO. 11)3 STORYPROPOSED PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION0.16 AC.6,756 SF-(FRANK SINATRA DRIVE)PROPOSED NET ACREAGE18.15 AC.790,811 SF100%PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "A"SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED659 STALLS240 STALLSONSITE PARKING DATA:COUNTPARKING RATIOUNITS / SF120 UNITS---(BUILDING NO(S). 5, 7, 8, 9 & 12)TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED394 UNITS-788 STALLSPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "B"(BUILDING NO(S). 4, 6 & 10)PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "C"(BUILDING NO(S). 1-3)PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "D"(BUILDING NO. 11)72 UNITS -72 UNITS -21 UNITS -144 STALLS144 STALLS42 STALLSDATA TABLE (CONTINUED)RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "E" (BUILDING NO. 13)LEASING / CLUBHOUSE BUILDING: (BUILDING NO. 14)1 STORY3 STORYFITNESS BUILDING: (BUILDING NO. 15)2 STORY- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "C" (1-3) 30,900 SF 0.71 AC. -- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "D" (11) 9,819 SF 0.23 AC. -- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "E" (13)44,361 SF 1.02 AC. -- PROPOSED LEASING / CLUBHOUSE BUILDING (14) 17,311 SF 0.40 AC. -- PROPOSED FITNESS BUILDING (15)2,553 SF 0.06 AC. -UNDERGROUND PARKING PROVIDED157 STALLS--SUB-TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED816 STALLS-2.07 STALLS PER UNITPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "E"(BUILDING NO. 13)109 UNITS -218 STALLSPUBLIC UTILITY PURVEYORS:ZONE "X": AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAINFEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION:LIQUEFACTION:MODERATE LIQUEFACTION ZONENOTES:1.ELECTRIC:GAS:TELEPHONE:WATER:CABLE:SEWER:USA:THIS MAP INCLUDES THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND DIVIDER.2. THERE ARE NO EXISTING DWELLINGS, BUILDINGS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES KNOWN ONTHIS PROPERTY.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYFRONTIER COMMUNICATIONSCOACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICTSPECTRUMCOACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICTUNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT(800) 684-8123(877) 238-0092(800) 921-8101(760) 398-2651(877) 719-3278(760) 398-2651(800) 227-2600SCHOOL DISTRICT:DESERT SANDS UNIFIEDAS SHOWN ON RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS,COMMUNITY PANEL MAP NUMBER: 06065C1595GEFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 28, 2008DATA TABLE (CONTINUED)TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED-2.07 STALLS PER UNIT 816 STALLSFRANK SINATRA & PORTOLAPROJECT NAME:LANDSCAPE, OPEN SPACE & RETENTION AREAS4.38 AC.191,694 SF24%R:\2746\Acad\Planning\Site Plan\2746 Technical Site Plan with Additional Parking.dwg, 10/3/2022 10:51:48 AM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc.Page 17 of 100
NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGMH
MH
MHMH MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
AHEADAHEADAHEADAHEADAHEAD
SIGNALSIGNAL
SIGNALSIGNALSIGNALSP
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
STOPSTOP
STOPSP
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH MH
MH
MH
MH
265
265
265265
265270270
270
270
270
270
270
270
275
275275
275
275
275 275275275275275
275
280
280280 280280280
280
280
280
280
280280280255266.6274.1276.9277.4275.7276.3277.1280.5280.1279.3279.8279.5279.9280.2278.7278.4278.7278.6279.3276.6276.3275.7275.2277.4276.4274.9274.6274.2274.2273.6273.6273.1273.4272.7280.5279.5279.4280.2280.3279.7279.2278.8278.5278.3277.9279.7279.2279.6281.3281.2280.3280.2280.2280.5280.4280.6281.2281.2279.3284.2277.6278.6277.1280.2275.9277.9278.7279.2278.6278.2277.5278.3279.9279.6278.5276.4277.1277.2276.9276.9276.6276.6276.3277.0277.1275.2275.6274.4274.7274.5273.7273.3274.3275.6273.7273.5276.1276.4276.3274.4275.2274.5272.1273.7274.6273.1272.8273.4273.5273.7273.5272.5272.4272.3273.1272.7272.2273.2271.8272.3271.3271.9278.2272.7274.5272.6272.7272.5272.4271.4271.4270.4270.4269.3269.5268.4268.4270.8270.4269.9269.3268.8269.6269.2267.6267.6267.4270.3272.3272.5272.4269.4270.7268.7267.5268.1269.1269.5266.7266.6267.4267.2265.4265.8266.1265.5264.7266.5266.1264.6263.6263.7262.4269.7270.5273.3278.1277.8280.2280.2M
PROP. BUILDING NO. 6FF = 276.3PE = 275.8
Prop. Trash Enclosure to IncludeRecycle & Organic Waste (Typ.)
Prop. Trash Enclosureto Include Recycle &Organic Waste (Typ.)
Ex. Curb & Gutter(Typ.)
8' Meandering SidewalkPer Landscape Plan
Prop. Trash Enclosureto Include Recycle &Organic Waste (Typ.)
Prop. Trash Enclosureto Include Recycle &Organic Waste (Typ.)
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 5FF = 277.3PE = 276.8
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 4FF = 278.6PE = 278.1
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 3FF = 278.0PE = 277.5
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 2FF = 278.6PE = 278.1
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 1FF = 279.5PE = 279.0
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 13FF = 280.2PE = 279.7GFF = 269.2
PROP. BUILDING NO. 12FF = 277.0PE = 276.5
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 7FF = 276.0PE = 275.5
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 8FF = 275.4PE = 274.9
PROP.BUILDINGNO. 15FF = 276.1PE = 275.6
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 14FF = 278.0PE = 277.5
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 9FF = 272.9PE = 272.4
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 11FF = 273.5PE = 273.0
PROP. BUILDINGNO. 10FF = 272.0PE = 271.5
10'Prop. 10' LandscapeSetback
10'Prop. 10' LandscapeSetback
Prop. 10'LandscapeSetback10'270.0BOTTOM
Prop. R/W Expansion8' Meandering SIdewalk PerLandscape PlanEx. Curb & GutterFRANK SINATRA DRIVEPORTO
L
A
A
V
E
N
U
E63'Move Ex. CatchBasin to end ofcurb return
275'
Re
m
o
v
e
E
x
.
M
e
d
i
a
n
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
(
I
n
O
n
l
y
)
P
o
c
k
e
t
35'
279.5TC
278.9TC
279.3TC
278.7TC
277.1TC
277.0TC
277.8TC
277.6TC 277.7TC
277.9TC277.9TC 279.7TC 278.8TC 276.0TC
279.0TC
279.5TC
279.7TC
279.5TC
279.3TC
278.7TC
278.6TC
277.9TC
278.2TC
278.3TC
277.5TC 277.8TC
277.5TC
277.3TC
277.8TC
277.6TC
278.1TC
278.3TC
277.2TC
276.5TC
276.3TC
275.7TC
278.0TC
275.2TC
275.0TC
275.9TC
274.5TC
274.8TC
271.7TC
272.0TC
274.6TC
274.4TC
276.0TC
276.4TC276.4TC277.3TC
277.3TC
277.3TC
276.8 TC2763. FL
276.5 TC276.0 FLJOIN EX.
276.2 TC275.7 FLJOIN EX.
276.8 TC276.3 FL
275.5TC/LP
275.0TC/HP
271.0 TC270.5 FLJOIN EX.
270.3FL
269.9FL
270.2 TC269.7 FLJOIN EX.
277.0TC
277.0FL
273.9TC
273.2FL
273.6TC
272.8TC
272.5TC
271.8TC
271.0TC/LP
271.2TC
271.7TC271.5TC
272.0TC
271.2TC
271.8TC
270.2TC
270.4TC
270.0TC
272.0TC
272.7TC
273.8TC
273.2TC
273.0TC
273.8TC
274.2TC
274.1TC
270.6TC
274.1TC
271.5TC
271.5TC
272.8TC
274.9TC
274.7TC
275.5TC
275.7TC
276.1TC
275.5TC
275.7TC
275.7TC
275.3TC
275.6COPING
278.5RIDGE
276.5COPING
279.7TC
278.9TC
277.0FG
279.0TC
279.7TC 279.5TC
280.0TC
278.8TC 278.6TC
278.5TC
277.9TC277.7FL
276.0FG
276.0FG
277.0FG
277.0
277.0FG277.9FG
275.0FG
277.1TC 277.3TC
276.6FS
277.5TC
277.3TC
276.5FS276.2TC
276.0TC
276.2TC
276.8TC
276.6TC276.4TC
276.6TC
276.7TC
276.5TC
278.3TC
278.1TC
278.4TC
278.2TC
279.9TC
279.7TC
279.7TC
279.5TC
276.3TC
276.5TC
279.5TC
279.2TC
279.1TC
272.4TC
271.7TC
271.1TC
274.7TC
272.1TC
271.9TC
273.8TC
273.4TC
272.7FS
273.1FS
271.5TC
270.8FS
270.8FL
275.5FG
273.8FG275.0FG
277.7FG
275.0FG
273.0FG
273.0FG
Prop. Property Fence per Landscape &Architecture Plans (Typ.)Prop. Property Fence per Landscape &Architecture Plans (Typ.)
Ridg
eRidge Prop. UndergroundRetention Basin (7'x80')
8' Meandering SidewalkPer Landscape Plan 20.5'34.25'
POOL
APN: 620-170-009
38105 PORTOLA AVEPALM DESERT CA 92260
APN: 620-400-029
38400
APN: 620-400-033
-
APN: 620-400-010
-
APN: 620-400-005
-
APN: 620-472-060
-
APN: 620-472-065
-40.727'Prop. 10'LandscapeSetback10'0.6%0.4%275.0TC/HP
5.2%5.1%70'
REM
O
V
E
E
X
I
S
T
M
E
D
I
A
N
T
O
CREA
T
E
L
E
F
T
T
U
R
N
P
O
C
K
E
T
REMOVE EXIST CURB&GUTTER TO CREATEENTRY CROSS GUTTER
PARCEL 2620-400-030VACANTEX. GENERAL PLAN:TOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOODEX. ZONING:PLANNED UNIT RESIDENTIAL(P.R.-22)
32.8'
43.7'
45.1'
42.8'
31.4'33.2'34.5'17.8'20.5'30.5'20.5'16.2'18'30'18'21.8'18'32'11.5'22.8'63'20'32.6'46.3'10.9'18'13.9'55.6'309.6'17'20.5'74.1'14.9'20.5'45.1'23
.6
'
30.6'
24'
10'
24'
29.1'16'18'30.5'20.5'30'30'18'20.4'
18'
30'
20.5'
26.9'23'23'20'26'20.5
'
26.4'18'30'18'22.8'24'29'
29'
PARCEL 1620-400-031VACANTEX. GENERAL PLAN:TOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOODEX. ZONING:PLANNED UNIT RESIDENTIAL(P.R.-22)
N 27
°
4
6
'
3
3
"
E
8
4
0
.
4
8
'
N 01°21'56" E 1923.00'N 89°52'08" E 686.08'N 04°19'04" E 58.45'
∆=23°27'29"R=1937.00'L=793.05'
∆=11°29'14"R=1863.00'L=373.51'
75'117.2'59.4'21.6'
21.6'
21.6'18'23.1'9'TYP.18'29.4'30'20.5'39.8'68.1'
19.5'
20.5
'
30'
20.5'
21.9
'
22'
18'
18'
21.4'15.2'18'30'81.2'60.3'20.5'10'10'10'POR
T
O
L
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
18'20.5'30.5'20.5'117.5'38.9'144.2'30'17'15'18'30'18'6'18'30'18'62.5'13.9'13.5'13.6'13.7'13.7'13.9'13.9'14.1'32'
17.8'
N 47°57'11" W29.27'
Prop. 8'Sidewalk 80'REMOVE EXIST CURB&GUTTER TO CREATEENTRY CROSS GUTTERREMOVE EXIST CURB&GUTTER TO CREATEENTRY CROSS GUTTER
80'
276.2TC
Prop. UndergroundRetention Basin (5 - 5'x100')
Prop. Underground RetentionBasin (2,350 LF OF 5')
Pro
p
.
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
Ret
e
n
t
i
o
n
B
a
s
i
n
(
8
'
x
1
4
0
'
)
Pro
p
.
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
Ret
e
n
t
i
o
n
B
a
s
i
n
(
8
'
x
1
4
0
'
)
270.2
TC
269.7
TC
269.5
TC/LP 271.0
TC
271.0
TC
270.8
TC
271.3
TC270.4
TC
270.4
TC/LP
272.7
TC/LP
271.7
TC/LP
273.4
TC/LP
273.3
TC/LP
273.0
TC/LP
273.4
TC/LP
273.5
TC
273.7
TC
273.2
TC 276.7
TC
270.1FL
270.9
TC
270.5
TC
270.9
TC
EX. POWER POLE TOBE RELOCATED270.0
TC/LP
274.3
TC
273.7
TC
273.1
TC
272.9
TC
272.8
TC
271.8
TC
272.0
TC
272.6
TC 273.3
TC/LP
272.5
TC
273.3
TC
(273.7)
EX. TC
(274.3)
EX. TCEX. POWER POLE AND GUY WIRETO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE(273.0)
EX. TC
(272.5)
EX. TC
(271.7)
EX. TC
(269.7)
EX. TC
(268.6)
EX. TC
(266.4)
EX. TC
(265.1)
EX. TC
(262.4)
EX. TC
(274.7)
EX. TC
(275.5)
EX. TC
(276.0)
EX. TC
PE 269.51600 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211
PE 269.22800 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211
PE 271.31700 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211
PE 271.91800 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211
PE 274.51900 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211
PUTTINGGREEN
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MHMH
MH
MH
MHSTOP
275 275280280279.7
279.7
276.7
275.8276.2276.5 275.5 275.1 274.2274.6274.9
273.7
APN: 694391014
74085 DAISY LNPALM DESERTCA 92211
APN: 694391015
74091 DAISY LNPALM DESERTCA 92211
APN: 694392014
74109 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211
APN: 694392013
74123 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211
APN: 694392012
74137 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211
APN: 694392011
74151 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211
APN: 694392010
74165 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211
APN: 694392009
74179 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211
APN: 694392008
74193 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211
FRANK SINATRA DRIVE
0'100'
SCALE 1"=50'
50'150'200'
MSA CONSULTING,INC.
C i v il E n g i n e e r i n g L a n d S u r v e y i n g L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r ePlanningEnvironmentalServicesDryUtilityCoordinationGIS
34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 | 760.320.9811 | MSAConsultinginc.com Copyright 2022
All Rights ReservedMSA Consulting, Inc.c
EAST
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT
EXISTING
(E)
(N)
(S)
(W)
C/L
ESMT.
EX.
ABBREVIATIONS
ACREAGEAC
CURB AND GUTTERC&G
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERAPN
E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT
A.C. ASPHALT CONCRETE
MAX. MAXIMUM
BOUNDARYBNDRY
M.B. MAP BOOK
EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE
EXISTING SEWER
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
PROPOSED CURB
PROPOSED EASEMENT
EXISTING PROJECT BOUNDARY
EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN
EXISTING WATER
PROPOSED LOT LINE
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE
PROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARY
EXISTING IRRIGATION
EXISTING GAS
EXISTING EASEMENT
EXISTING ELECTRIC
EXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINE
EXISTING CABLE
EXISTING CONTOURS
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS
LEGEND
EXISTING LOT LINE
EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT
EXISTING TELEPHONE MIN. MINIMUM
NUMBER
PROPOSED
RIGHT OF WAY
TYPICAL
NO.
PROP.
R/W
TYP.
P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
SF SQUARE FEET
RADIUSR
STANDARDSTD.
P/L PROPERTY LINE
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE
R-L LOW DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL)
UG UNDERGROUND
OVERHEADO/H
OPEN SPACE / PARKSOS/PP
PAGEPG.
DATA TABLE
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:620-400-030 & -031
EXHIBIT DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2022
SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY:
ADDRESS:
INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.
7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503
DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY:DECEMBER 22, 2021
EXHIBIT PREPARER:
ADDRESS:
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
34200 BOB HOPE DRIVERANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270
CONTACT:PAUL DEPALATIS, AICP TELEPHONE:(760) 320-9811
REVISIONS
NO. DATE
IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
DESCRIPTION
A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST,SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
TELEPHONE:(951) 687-4252
APPLICANT /
ADDRESS:
CONTACT:
5021 VERNON AVENUE, SUITE 201EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436
CALVIN HAYES
HAYES DIETRICH, LLCLAND OWNER:
%%UESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES
RAW QUANTITIES
SUBSIDENCE 3,326 1,333
RAW ADJUSTED 46,113 8,584
SHRINKAGE 1,515
EXPORT
TOTAL EARTHWORK %%O169,998 %%O169,998
SUBTOTAL 71,223 39,639
OVER-EX (PADS)21,806 21,806
OVER-EX (PADS) SHRINKAGE 3,848
49,439 7,251
CUT (CY)FILL (CY)
130,359
{EARTHWORK NOTE: ASSUMED EARTHWORK ANALYSIS FACTORS:}{THE FOLLOWING FACTORS WERE USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THE EARTHWORK ANALYSIS:SHRINKAGE:. 15%SUBSIDENCE: 0.15'OVEREXCAVATION 3'DISTURBED AREA 18 ACRES
ALL OF THE FACTORS WERE OBTAINED FROM SLADDEN ENGINEERING, PROJECT No. 544-22072, DATED MAY 17, 2022.
SHRINKAGE: 10% - 20%SUBSIDENCE: 0.1' - 0.20'OVER EXCAVATION 3.0'
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY WAS PROVIDED BY INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC., DATED DECEMBER 22, 2021.}
{EATHWORK NOTE:}{THE EXPORT SHOWN (45,437 C.Y.) ON THE PLAN, WILL BE EXPORTEDTO THE PROPERTY DIRECTLY (ADJOINTING PROPERTY) TO THEWEST. THAT PROPERTY IS UNDER THE SAME OWNERSHIP. }
OVER-EX (STREETS)3,304 3,304
OVER-EX (STREETS) SHRINKAGE 583
PRELIMINARY
GRADING & UTILITY PLAN
PROPOSED PERIMETER FENCE &
WALL COMBINATION. SEE
ARCHITECT PLAN FOR DETAILS
{PROJECT DATA}
{GROSS ACREAGE 18.31 AC. NETACREAGE 18.15 AC.}
SITE
RAMON RD
DINAH SHORE DR
GERALD FORD DR
FRANK SINATRA DR
COUNTRY CLUB DR
FRED WARING DR
HWY 111
HOVLEY LN
BOB HOPE DRMONTEREY AVEPORTOLA AVEEL DORADO DROASIS CLUB DRINT
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
1
0
COOK STN.T.S.
VICINITY MAP
NORTH PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION
UNDERGROUND RETENTION SYSTEM 98,775
PE 277.5100 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211
R:\2746\Acad\Grading. reliminary\2746 Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg, 10/3/2022 9:25:05 AM, lcantabrana, MSA Consulting, Inc.
Page 18 of 100
NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGMSA CONSULTING, INC.
Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape ArchitecturePlanning Environmental Services Dry Utility Coordination GIS
34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 | 760.320.9811 | MSAConsultinginc.com
&R:\2746\Acad\Improvement Plans\Preliminary Water and Sewer\2746 Preliminary Utility Exhibit.dwg, 10/3/2022 9:33:29 AM, lcantabrana, MSA Consulting, Inc.Page 19 of 100
Landscape Site Plan
L-1
Frank Sinatra & Portola |
October 3, 2022
Port
o
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e Frank Sinatra DriveResidential Residential
BuildingBuilding
Type A Type A
Residential Residential
BuildingBuilding
Type A Type A
Residential Residential
BuildingBuilding
Type A Type A
Residential Residential
BuildingBuilding
Type D Type D
Residential Residential
BuildingBuilding
Type A Type A
Residential Residential
BuildingBuilding
Type A Type A
Residential Residential
BuildingBuilding
Type A Type A
Leasing/ Club-Leasing/ Club-
house Building house Building
Type FType F
Fitness Building Fitness Building
Type GType G
Residential Residential
BuildingBuilding
Type B Type B
Residential Residential
BuildingBuilding
Type B Type B
BuildingBuilding
Type C Type C
BuildingBuilding
Type C Type C
BuildingBuilding
Type C Type C
BuildingBuilding
Type E Type E23
5
5
5
1
1
6
7
10
Trees:
Acacia aneur
Qty = +/- 80
Prosopis x Phoenix
Qty = 50
Acacia salincina
Qty = +/- 80
Parkinsonia x
‘Desert Museum’
Qty = 100
Washingtonia
fi lifera
Qty = 40
Phoenix
dactylifera
Qty = 23
4
Key Notes:
Pool
BBQ Area
Putting Green
Dog Park
Water Retention Areas
2
3
4
5
1
6
Yoga Lawn
7 Property Wall & Fence Combination
7
7
4’ Ht CMU plaster block wall (color Dove White) with
2’ Painted Metal picket fence view panels on top
and CMU plaster pilasters at 50’ on center.
Property Wall & Fence Combination
Note: Trees to be planted in various size boxes between 24” & 48”. Some of
the larger boxed trees to be utilized along perimeter planting areas (inside &
outside project boundary wall) to assist with perimeter screening.
6
Page 20 of 100
Project Entry & Utility ScreeningFrank Sinatra & Portola |
October 3, 2022
Port
o
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
Key Notes:
Typical Utility Screening
Main Entry
Automatic Entry/Exit Gates
Secured Man-Gate
Entry Keypad Kiosk
Entry Signage (See Architectural
Package)
Project Monument Icon
at Roundabout
Utility Boxes
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
1
1
Character Imagery
5
Key Map
Porto
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e Frank Sinatra DriveL-2
Page 21 of 100
Fitness Club AreaFrank Sinatra & Portola |
October 3, 2022
23
4
7
5
1
6
Character Imagery
7
2 1
4
Key Map
Porto
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e Frank Sinatra DriveL-3
6
Key Notes:
Fitness Pool Golf Cages
Yoga Lawn Walking Track
Cabanas
Firepit with Tumbled Glass
Putting Green
2 7
3
4
5
1 6
Page 22 of 100
Main Pool and Clubhouse Area
L-4
Frank Sinatra & Portola |
October 3, 2022
Key Notes:
Main Swimming Pool Seating Area
Daybed FurnishingJacuzzi / Spa
Cabanas
Fireplace & Seating Area
Covered BBQ & Counter
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
1
1
6
7
7
6
Character Imagery
6
4
3
Key Map
Porto
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e Frank Sinatra Drive7
Fire Access Lane - Gravel Pave w/ Stabilized
Decomposed Granite8
8
3
8
Page 23 of 100
L-5
Frank Sinatra & Portola |
October 3, 2022
Plant Palette - Shrubs
Agave americana
Hesperaloe parvifl ora ‘Yel-
low’
Lantana ‘New Gold’
Tecoma x ‘Orange Jubilee’
Agave desmettiana
Pedilanthus bracteatus
Lantana montevidensis
‘White’
Tecoma x ‘Solar Flare’
Agave weberi
Lophocereus marginatus
Eremophila hygrophana
Tecoma x ‘Gold Star’
Aloe barbadensis Hesperaloe tenufolia
Polygaloides paucifolia
Elaeocarpus decipiens
Asclepias subulata
Muhlenbergia capillaris
Leucophyllum candidum
Dasylirion wheeleri
Acacia redolens
Russelia x St Elmo’s Fire
Dalea greggii
Senna artemisiodes
Fouquieria splendens
Eremophila mingenew
Senna phyllodinea
Hesperaloe parvifl ora
Lantana montevidensis
Simmodsia chinensis
Mojave gold
Decomposed granite
Copper canyon
3/4” gravel
Page 24 of 100
UNIT B2UNIT B2
UNIT B2 UNIT B2
UNIT C7
UNIT C7UNIT C7
UNIT C7 ELEC.UTLITY136' - 1"85' - 1"28' - 10"3' - 1"21' - 3"3' - 1"28' - 10"3' - 4"8' - 2"13' - 7"6' - 3"18' - 2"7' - 9"21' - 5"28' - 10"21' - 5"7' - 9"18' - 2"6' - 3"3' - 8"10' - 9"LEVEL 1 PATIO
LOW WALL TYP.
2' - 6"
ROOF ACCESS
ROOF TOP
MECHANICALS
SCREENED BY ROOF
PARAPET TYP.
INTERNAL ROOF DRAIN
TYP.
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL
FUTURE SOLAR TYP.
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
ROOF HEIGHT 32'-0" TYP.
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT
TYP.
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
TRELLIS TYP.
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
13' -6" x 19' -6"
LIVING / DINING
12' -6" x 12' -2"
KITCHEN
11' -0" x 10' -10"
BEDROOM
5' -6" x 9' -3"
BATH
9' -7" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
WATER HEATER
18' -8" x 15' -8"
LIVING / DINING 12' -0" x 13' -2"
BEDROOM
12' -0" x 9' -2"
BATH
8' -7" x 8' -3"
BATH
10' -9" x 12' -8"
BEDROOM
15' -9" x 12' -10"
KITCHEN
15' -2" x 8' -0"
BALCONY
15' -2" x 8' -0"
BALCONY
WATER HEATER
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:29 PMA3
TYPICAL PLANS -
BUILDING TYPE A
221570
Author Checker
05/03/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1" = 10'-0"A3
1 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - WALK-UP A (LEVELS 2 &3 SIM)
1" = 10'-0"A3
2 ROOF PLAN - WALK-UP A
UNIT PLAN - B2 - 824 SF
UNIT PLAN - C7 - 1,385 SF
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 25 of 100
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED
BY ROOF PARAPET
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-6"
T.O. ROOF DECK
EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED
BY ROOF PARAPET
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-6"
T.O. ROOF DECK
EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"+/- 5' - 0"ROOF PARAPET TO
SCREEN MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT TYP.
ROOF MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT
SCREENING CONDITION APPLIES TO ALL WALK UP UNITS
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:30 PMA4
ELEVATIONS - BUILDING
TYPE A
221570
Author Checker
05/31/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
BUILDING TYPE A ELEVATION - (FRONT / BACK)
BUIDING TYPE A ELEVATION - (SIDES)
1/4" = 1'-0"A4
3 PARAPET SCREENING SECTION - WALK UP
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 26 of 100
A B CDEFG
AB
C
DEG
AB CDEF G
A BC DEG
MANUFACTURED STONE
ROCK FACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
EDSTUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM DOVE WHITE
BA PAINTED METAL TRELLIS
COLOR: BRONZECSTUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM PALM DESERT TAN
STUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM WAYNESBORO TAUPE
F METAL PANEL
COLOR: BRONZE G WINDOW TRIM
COLOR: BRONZE
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:31 PMA5
COLORED ELEVATIONS -
BUILDING TYPE A
221570
Author Checker
05/04/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING A - COLORED NORTH ELEVAITON RESIDENTIAL BUILDING A - COLORED EAST ELEVATION
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING A - COLORED SOUTH ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING A - COLORED WEST ELEVATION
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 27 of 100
128' - 7"
UNIT B4
UNIT B4UNIT B4
UNIT B4
UNIT C3
UNIT C3UNIT C3
UNIT C3 ELEC.UTILITY30' - 3"27' - 6"13' - 1"27' - 6"6' - 10"18' - 11"4' - 6"8' - 2"29' - 7"2' - 10"20' - 3"2' - 10"29' - 7"8' - 2"101' - 5"2' - 10"
1' - 10"5' - 6"8' - 2"5' - 10"ROOF ACCESS
ROOF TOP
MECHANICALS
SCREENED BY HIP
ROOF PARAPET TYP.
INTERNAL ROOF DRAIN
TYP.
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL
FUTURE SOLAR
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT
TYP.
20' -2" x 12' -7"
LIVING / DINING
10' -2" x 13' -1"
BEDROOM
10' -2" x 13' -1"
BEDROOM
10' -0" x 14' -8"
KITCHEN
6' -2" x 14' -1"
BATH
12' -0" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
WATER HEATER
16' -0" x 8' -0"
BALCONY
17' -0" x 17' -9"
LIVING / DINING
11' -10" x 14' -5"
BEDROOM
8' -3" x 8' -9"
BATH
8' -10" x 8' -8"
BATH
11' -9" x 11' -11"
BEDROOM
12' -7" x 11' -5"
KITCHEN
WATER HEATER
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:35 PMA6
TYPICAL PLANS -
BUILDING TYPE B
221570
Author Checker
05/03/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1" = 10'-0"A6
1 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - WALK-UP B (LEVELS 2&3 SIM)
1" = 10'-0"A6
2 ROOF PLAN - WALK-UP B
UNIT PLAN - B4 - 865 SF
UNIT PLAN - C3 - 1,290 SF
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 28 of 100
ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY ROOF PARAPETT.O. LEVEL 1EL- 0'-0"T.O. LEVEL 3EL- 21'-4"T.O. PARAPETEL- 37'-0"T.O. LEVEL 2EL- 10'-8"T.O. PARAPETEL- 37'-0"T.O. PARAPETEL- 33'-6"T.O. ROOFEL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY ROOF PARAPETT.O. LEVEL 1EL- 0'-0"T.O. LEVEL 3EL- 21'-4"T.O. PARAPETEL- 35'-0"T.O. LEVEL 2EL- 10'-8"T.O. PARAPETEL- 37'-0"T.O. PARAPETEL- 33'-6"T.O. ROOFEL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of California10/3/2022 3:43:34 PMA7ELEVATIONS - BUILDINGTYPE B221570AuthorChecker05/31/22Frank Sinatra & PortolaFrank Sinatra &PortolaPalm Desert, CALAND USESUBMITAL06/07/2022BUILDING TYPE B ELEVATION - (FRONT / BACK)BUILDING TYPE B ELEVATION - (SIDES)No. Description Date1 REVISED SUBMITTAL8/1/222 REVISED SUBMITTAL10/3/22Page 29 of 100
A BC DEG
A B DECG
A BC DEG
A BC DEG
MANUFACTURED STONE
ROCK FACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
EDSTUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM DOVE WHITE
BA PAINTED METAL TRELLIS
COLOR: BRONZECSTUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM PALM DESERT TAN
STUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM WAYNESBORO TAUPE
F METAL PANEL
COLOR: BRONZE G WINDOW TRIM
COLOR: BRONZE
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:37 PMA8
COLORED ELEVATIONS -
BUILDING TYPE B
221570
Author Checker
05/04/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING B - COLORED NORTH ELEVATION
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING B - COLORED WEST ELEVATION
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING B - COLORED EAST ELEVATION
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING B - COLORED SOUTH ELEVATION
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 30 of 100
UNIT B5
UNIT B5UNIT B5
UNIT B5
UNIT C2
UNIT C2
UNIT C2
UNIT C2
UTILITYELEC.144' - 9"
8' - 1"16' - 7"10' - 7"22' - 1"11' - 1"7' - 11"11' - 1"22' - 1"11' - 4"15' - 10"8' - 1"8' - 1"23' - 8"9' - 0"3' - 11"9' - 0"23' - 8"8' - 5"85' - 10"3' - 5"
2' - 0"8' - 1"5' - 9"12' - 2"ROOF ACCESS
ROOF TOP
MECHANICALS
SCREENED BY HIP
ROOF PARAPET TYP.
INTERNAL ROOF DRAIN
TYP.
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL
FUTURE SOLAR
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
TRELLIS
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT
TYP.
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
22' -6" x 10' -6"
LIVING / DINING
9' -6" x 6' -3"
BATH
11' -5" x 10' -6"
BEDROOM
6' -5" x 11' -7"
BATH
11' -3" x 10' -7"
BEDROOM
14' -2" x 12' -0"
KITCHEN
14' -11" x 10' -5"
BALCONY
WATER HEATER
13' -10" x 10' -1"
BALCONY
14' -2" x 19' -5"
LIVING / DINING
11' -6" x 10' -10"
BEDROOM
5' -6" x 9' -4"
BATH
13' -1" x 11' -3"
KITCHEN
WATER HEATER
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:42 PMA9
TYPICAL PLANS -
BUILDING TYPE C
221570
Author Checker
05/03/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1" = 10'-0"A9
1 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - WALK-UP C (LEVELS 2&3 SIM)
1" = 10'-0"A9
2 ROOF PLAN - WALK-UP C
UNIT PLAN - C2 - 1,220 SF
UNIT PLAN - B5 - 863 SF
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 31 of 100
ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED
BY ROOF PARAPET
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-6"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED
BY ROOF PARAPET
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. MASONRY
EL- 35'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-6"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"T.O. ROOF
EL- 32'-0"+/- 37' - 0"PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:42 PMA10
ELEVATIONS - BUILDING
TYPE C
221570
Author Checker
05/31/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
BUILDING TYPE C ELEVATIONS - (FRONT / BACK)
BUILDING TYPE C ELEVATIONS - (SIDES)
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 32 of 100
AB CDEGABCDEFG
AB CDEFG AB CDEG
MANUFACTURED STONE
ROCK FACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
EDSTUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM DOVE WHITE
BA PAINTED METAL TRELLIS
COLOR: BRONZECSTUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM PALM DESERT TAN
STUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM WAYNESBORO TAUPE
F METAL PANEL
COLOR: BRONZE G WINDOW TRIM
COLOR: BRONZE
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:44 PMA11
COLORED ELEVATIONS -
BUILDING TYPE C
221570
Author Checker
04/07/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022RESIDENTIAL BUILDING C - COLORED EAST ELEVATIONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING C - COLORED NORTH ELEVATION
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING C - COLORED SOUTH ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING C - COLORED WEST ELEVATION
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 33 of 100
UNIT B2
UNIT B2UNIT B2
UNIT B2
UNIT C7
UNIT C7
UNIT C9 ELEC.ELEC.143' - 1"
7' - 9"17' - 1"7' - 4"21' - 1"29' - 6"21' - 1"11' - 2"4' - 6"16' - 10"4' - 0"35' - 4"21' - 10"14' - 8"11' - 10"6' - 9"
4' - 0"11' - 10"7' - 4"13' - 7"100' - 0"83' - 8"ROOF ACCESS
ROOF TOP MECHANICALS
SCREENED BY HIP ROOF
PARAPET TYP.
INTERNAL ROOF
DRAIN TYP.
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL
FUTURE SOLAR
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
SOLAR READY AT
FLAT ROOF AREAS
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6"
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"
TRELLIS TYP.
10' -0" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
13' -7" x 20' -5"
LIVING / DINING
11' -2" x 10' -10"
BEDROOM
9' -6" x 11' -8"
KITCHEN
5' -6" x 9' -4"
BATH
14' -5" x 9' -2"
BALCONY
18' -6" x 16' -0"
LIVING / DINING
11' -10" x 13' -4"
BED
11' -10" x 9' -2"
BATH
14' -9" x 12' -6"
KITCHEN
8' -7" x 8' -3"
BATH
11' -0" x 12' -8"
BED
33' -8" x 26' -0"
BALCONY
18' -2" x 26' -2"
LIVING / DINING
12' -5" x 12' -5"
BED
12' -5" x 9' -8"
BATH
13' -11" x 16' -6"
KITCHEN
12' -5" x 5' -3"
BATH
10' -5" x 12' -8"
DEN
12' -5" x 12' -8"
BED
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:48 PMA12
TYPICAL PLANS -
BUILDING TYPE D
221570
Author Checker
05/06/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1" = 10'-0"A12
1 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - WALK-UP D (LEVELS 2&3 SIM)
1" = 10'-0"A12
2 ROOF PLAN - WALK-UP D
UNIT PLAN - B2 - 824 SFUNIT PLAN - C7 - 1,385 SF
UNIT PLAN - C9 - 1,850 SF
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
WATER HEATER
WATER HEATER
WATER HEATER
Page 34 of 100
ROOF TOP MECHANICALS
SCREENED BY PARAPET
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-6"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"ROOF TOP MECHANICALS
SCREENED BY PARAPET
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-6"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:49 PMA13
ELEVATIONS - BUILDING
TYPE D
221570
Author Checker
05/31/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
BUILDING TYPE D ELEVATIONS - FRONT
BUILDING TYPE D ELEVATIONS - LEFT SIDE
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 35 of 100
ROOF TOP MECHANICALS
SCREENED BY PARAPET
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-6"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"37' - 0"ROOF TOP MECHANICALS
SCREENED BY PARAPET
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 37'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-6"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:49 PMA13.1
ELEVATIONS - BUILDING
TYPE D
221570
Author Checker
08/01/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
BUILDING TYPE D ELEVATIONS - RIGHT SIDE
BUILDING TYPE D ELEVATIONS - BACK
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 36 of 100
AB CDEEFG
AB CDEFG
AB CDECG
A B CDE
T.O. LEVEL
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL
EL- 10'-6"
G
MANUFACTURED STONE
ROCK FACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
EDSTUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM DOVE WHITE
BA PAINTED METAL TRELLIS
COLOR: BRONZECSTUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM PALM DESERT TAN
STUCCO
MEDIUM SAND FINISH
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM WAYNESBORO TAUPE
F METAL PANEL
COLOR: BRONZE G WINDOW TRIM
COLOR: BRONZE
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:50 PMA14
COLORED ELEVATIONS -
RESIDENTIAL TYPE D
221570
Author Checker
05/06/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING D - COLORED NORTH ELEVATION
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING D - COLORED SOUTH ELEVATION
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING D - COLORED EAST ELEVAITON
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING D - COLORED WEST ELEVATION
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 37 of 100
RAMP UP
ELEC.
WATER
TRASH
PET SPA
RA
18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"349' - 4"124' - 0"265' - 6"185' - 0"83' - 10"309' - 0"
24' - 0"
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:51 PMA15
LEVEL P1 - MULTIFAMILY
BUILDNG
221570
Author Checker
05/06/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1/16" = 1'-0"A15
1 LOWER LEVEL PARKING - BUILDING TYPE E
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 38 of 100
DOWN TO LVL P1
ENTRY
LOUNGE
PACKAGE
MAIL
UNIT D2 UNIT C1
UNIT C8
UNIT B3
UNIT B6
UNIT C6
UNIT B1
UNIT C4
UNIT A1
UNIT M1
UNIT D2
UNIT D2
UNIT D2
UNIT M1 UNIT M1
UNIT A1
UNIT A1
UNIT A1
UNIT A1
UNIT M1
UNIT C1UNIT C1
UNIT B3
UNIT B1
UNIT B1
UNIT B3
UNIT C5
UNIT B1
UNIT C4UNIT A1 UNIT B3UNIT B1UNIT B381' - 10"4' - 0"
316' - 6"258' - 8"340' - 6"185' - 5"6' - 10"4' - 0"131' - 0"75' - 0"38' - 9"66' - 9"91' - 9"74' - 2"6' - 10"13' - 0"
6' - 11"13' - 10"8' - 3"2' - 11"
6' - 10"12' - 10"7' - 7"2' - 10"
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:09:57 PMA16
LEVEL 1 - MULTIFAMILY
BULDING
221570
Author Checker
05/04/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1/16" = 1'-0"A16
1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 39 of 100
UNIT D2 UNIT C1
UNIT C8
UNIT B3
UNIT B6
UNIT C6
UNIT B1
UNIT C4UNIT A1
UNIT M1
UNIT D2
UNIT D2
UNIT D2
UNIT M1 UNIT M1
UNIT A1
UNIT A1
UNIT A1
UNIT A1
UNIT M1
UNIT C1UNIT C1
UNIT B3
UNIT B1
UNIT B1
UNIT B3
UNIT C5
UNIT B1
UNIT M1 UNIT M1 UNIT C8
UNIT C1
UNIT C1
UNIT C4UNIT A1 UNIT B3UNIT B1UNIT B3
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:04 PMA17
LEVEL 2 & 3 -
MULTIFAMILY BUILDNG
221570
Author Checker
05/06/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1/16" = 1'-0"A17
1 LEVEL 2 & 3 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING TYPE E
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 40 of 100
16' -4" x 13' -4"
KITCHEN
12' -2" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
12' -4" x 12' -4"
BED
6' -10" x 11' -11"
BATH
11' -9" x 13' -7"
LIVING
6' -0" x 12' -3"
BALCONY
13' -7" x 12' -5"
LIVING
12' -4" x 11' -5"
BED
7' -0" x 12' -10"
BATH
11' -7" x 14' -0"
KITCHEN
13' -2" x 18' -9"
LIVING
13' -4" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
6' -4" x 10' -11"
BATH
8' -5" x 16' -9"
KITCHEN
12' -2" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
11' -1" x 16' -0"
BED
14' -5" x 18' -5"
LIVING / DINING
12' -2" x 14' -9"
KITCHEN
9' -8" x 9' -2"
BATH
12' -0" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
11' -5" x 12' -6"
LIVING
15' -4" x 9' -6"
KITCHEN
10' -3" x 11' -6"
BED
5' -10" x 10' -2"
BATH
9' -10" x 12' -1"
BATH
13' -8" x 12' -8"
LIVING
7' -9" x 10' -5"
BATH
11' -10" x 13' -0"
BED
12' -0" x 12' -10"
BED
10' -0" x 14' -0"
KITCHEN
6' -0" x 15' -4"
BALCONY
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:07 PMA18
UNIT PLANS -
MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
221570
Author Checker
05/06/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
UNIT PLAN - B1 - 799 SF
UNIT PLAN - B3 - 856 SF
UNIT PLAN - M1 - 620 SFUNIT PLAN - B6 - 943 SF
UNIT PLAN - A1 - 690 SFUNIT PLAN - C1 - 1233 SF
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 41 of 100
16' -2" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
21' -4" x 13' -9"
LIVING / DINING
14' -9" x 11' -1"
KITCHEN
14' -3" x 13' -0"
BED
11' -2" x 15' -10"
BED
9' -10" x 6' -8"
BATH
6' -9" x 13' -3"
BATH
12' -2" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
10' -6" x 12' -9"
BED 13' -0" x 11' -9"
LIVING
11' -10" x 11' -0"
BED
9' -3" x 18' -0"
DEN6' -2" x 13' -9"
BATH
10' -3" x 13' -9"
KITCHEN
9' -11" x 11' -2"
BATH
11' -2" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
14' -4" x 20' -2"
LIVING / DINING11' -5" x 16' -3"
KITCHEN
12' -0" x 11' -6"
BED
6' -2" x 13' -8"
BATH
7' -3" x 10' -6"
BATH
12' -6" x 10' -6"
BED
12' -2" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
12' -1" x 12' -0"
BED
13' -8" x 12' -8"
LIVING
11' -10" x 15' -3"
BED
10' -8" x 12' -9"
KITCHEN
12' -1" x 8' -2"
BATH
12' -1" x 7' -7"
DEN
7' -8" x 10' -2"
BATH
11' -8" x 6' -0"
BALCONY
19' -11" x 13' -5"
LIVING / DINING12' -7" x 13' -11"
BED
12' -7" x 9' -1"
BATH
16' -0" x 10' -9"
KITCHEN
12' -0" x 11' -0"
BATH
12' -0" x 11' -0"
BED
12' -11" x 6' -6"
BATH
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:10 PMA19
UNIT PLANS -
MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
221570
Author Checker
05/05/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
UNIT PLAN - C8 - 1,427 SF
UNIT PLAN - C4 - 1,405 SF
UNIT PLAN - C5 - 1,405 SF
UNIT PLAN - C6 - 1,396 SFUNIT PLAN - D2 - 1,679 SF
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 42 of 100
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED
BY PARAPET
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-6"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-0"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 31'-6"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"
T.O. OVERRUN
EL- 42'-0"
ELEVATOR
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"
MECHANICAL UNIT
EXHAUST TYP.
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-6"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-0"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 31'-6"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"
T.O. OVERRUN
EL- 42'-0"
ELEVATOR OVERRUNROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED
BY PARAPET
ELEVATOR
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 40'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"
MECHANICAL UNIT
EXHAUST TYP.
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
ELEVATOR OVERRUNROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED
BY PARAPET
ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED
BY PARAPET
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-6"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-0"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 31'-6"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"
T.O. OVERRUN
EL- 42'-0"
ELEVATOR
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 40'-0"
MECHANICAL UNIT
EXHAUST TYP.
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-6"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-0"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 31'-6"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"
T.O. OVERRUN
EL- 42'-0"
ELEVATOR
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 33'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"
MECHANICAL UNIT
EXHAUST TYP.
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:11 PMA20
BUILDING ELEVATIONS -
MULTIFAMILY
221570
Author Checker
05/31/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
MULTIFAMILY - EAST ELEVATION
MULTIFAMILY - NORTH ELEVATION
MULTIFAMILY - SOUTH ELEVATION
MULTIFAMILY - WEST ELEVATION
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 43 of 100
A BCEFDAG
A BCD EECF
MANUFACTURED STONE
ROCK FACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
EDSTUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM DOVE WHITE
BA TRELLIS:
WOOD LOOK COMPOSITECSTUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM PALM DESERT TAN
STUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM WAYNESBORO TAUPE
F METAL PANEL
COLOR: BRONZE G WINDOW TRIM
COLOR: BRONZE
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:11 PMA21
COLORED ELEVATIONS -
MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
221570
Author Checker
04/07/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022MULTIFAMILY - COLORED NORTH ELEVAITON
MULTIFAMILY - COLORED EAST ELEVATION
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 44 of 100
A BCD CE
AB DE F
MANUFACTURED STONE
ROCK FACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
EDSTUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM DOVE WHITE
BA TRELLIS:
WOOD LOOK COMPOSITECSTUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM PALM DESERT TAN
STUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM WAYNESBORO TAUPE
F METAL PANEL
COLOR: BRONZE G WINDOW TRIM
COLOR: BRONZE
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:12 PMA22
COLORED ELEVATIONS -
MULTIFAMILY BUILDING
221570
Author Checker
05/18/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
MULTIFAMILY - COLORED WEST ELEVATION
MULTIFAMILY -COLORED SOUTH ELEVATION No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 45 of 100
OPEN ROOFMECHANICALENCLOSUREOPEN ROOFMECHANICALENCLOSUREELEVATOROVERRUNROOF HATCHINTERNAL DRAINAGESYSTEMOPEN TRELLISABOVE BALCONIESBELOWOPEN TRELLISABOVE BALCONIESBELOWOPEN TRELLISABOVE BALCONIESBELOWINTERNAL DRAINAGESYSTEMPARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4"PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0"PARAPET HEIGHT 42'-0"CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE SOLARCONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE SOLARPARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4"PARAPET HEIGHT 40'-0"PARAPET HEIGHT 40'-0"ROOF HEIGHT 31'-6"PARAPET HEIGHT 39'-0"PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0"TYP.PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0"TYP.PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4"PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0"TYP.PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4"PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4"PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0"PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4"PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0"DOG HOUSE TO SCREEN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TYP.-STUCCO CLADDINGROOF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOUVER TO RESEMBLE WINDOW/DOOR MULLION COLOR+/- 8'-6"PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of California10/3/2022 3:43:51 PMA23ROOF PLAN -MULTIFAMILY BUILDING221570AuthorChecker05/04/22Frank Sinatra & PortolaFrank Sinatra &PortolaPalm Desert, CALAND USESUBMITAL06/07/20221/16" = 1'-0"A231ROOF PLAN - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING1/4" = 1'-0"A232PARAPET SCREENING SECTION - MULTIFAMILYNo. Description Date1 REVISED SUBMITTAL8/1/222 REVISED SUBMITTAL10/3/22Page 46 of 100
SWIMMING POOL
W A L K -U P M A IL / P A C K A G ELEASING L O U N G E
MECHANICAL
CABANASGAME
SIMULATOR
CO-WORKING
SPACE
GAME
ROOM
MENS
MENS PRIVATE TERRACEPRIVATE TERRACEPRIVATE TERRACEW O R K R O O M
O P E N
O F F IC E
O F F IC E
O F F IC E
M E C H .W C
E N T R Y /C O N C IE R G E
CANOPY OVERHEAD
S T O R
FIRE TRUCK
ACCESS PATH
VI
SI
TOR PARKI
NGFIRE TRUCK
ACCESS PATH
SPA
P A C K A G E R O O M
WOMENS
WOMENS OUTDOOR SHOWERSEXTERIOR
SCREENING
LOUNGE SEATING
C L U B R O O M
L O U N G E
ENTERTAINMENT
SUITE
ENTERTAINMENT
SUITE
THEATER
MAINTAINENCE
POOL EQUIPMENT
S L O P E
INTERNAL
DRAIN TYP.
S L O P E
CANOPY
CANOPY
MECHANICAL BELOW
CANOPY
PARAPET HEIGHT 18'-6"
ROOF HATCH
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:18 PMA24
CLUB HOUSE BUILDING &
POOL TERRACE PLAN
221570
Author Checker
04/07/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1/16" = 1'-0"A24
1 FLOOR PLAN - CLUB HOUSE & POOL TERRACE
1/16" = 1'-0"A24
2 ROOF PLAN - CLUB HOUSE
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 47 of 100
T.O. LEVEL
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 18'-6"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 27'-0"
T.O. ROOF DECK
EL- 15'-0"
OUTDOOR MECHANICAL
SCREENING SYSTEM
T.O. LEVEL
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 18'-6"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 27'-0"
T.O. ROOF DECK
EL- 15'-6"
OUTDOOR MECHANICAL
SCREENING SYSTEM
T.O. LEVEL
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 18'-6"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 27'-0"
T.O. ROOF DECK
EL- 15'-6"
T.O. LEVEL
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 18'-6"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 27'-0"
T.O. ROOF DECK
EL- 15'-6"
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:19 PMA25
BUILDING ELEVATIONS -
CLUBHOUSE
221570
Author Checker
05/31/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
CLUBHOUSE - SOUTH ELEVATION
CLUBHOUSE - WEST ELEVATION
CLUBHOUSE - NORTHEAST ELEVATION
CLUBHOUSE - NORTH ELEVATION
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 48 of 100
ABC D
ABCD
ABCD
MANUFACTURED STONE
TEXTURE: ROCKFACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
BSTUCCO
BASIS OF DESIGN COLOR:
BM SAND DOLLAR
A METAL ACCENTS
PAINTED COLOR: BRONZE
TRELLIS INFILL SLATS:
WOOD LOOK COMPOSITE
C WINDOW TRIM
COLOR: BRONZED
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:20 PMA26
COLORED ELEVATIONS -
CLUBHOUSE
221570
Author Checker
04/07/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
CLUBHOUSE - NORTH
CLUBHOUSE - NORHTWEST
CLUBHOUSE - NORTHEAST
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 49 of 100
A B CD
AB CD
A B C D
MANUFACTURED STONE
TEXTURE: ROCKFACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
BSTUCCO
BASIS OF DESIGN COLOR:
BM SAND DOLLAR
A METAL ACCENTS
PAINTED COLOR: BRONZE
TRELLIS INFILL SLATS:
WOOD LOOK COMPOSITE
C WINDOW TRIM
COLOR: BRONZED
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:21 PMA27
COLORED ELEVATIONS -
CLUBHOUSE
221570
Author Checker
05/23/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
CLUBHOUSE - SOUTH
CLUBHOUSE - WEST
CLUBHOUSE-SOUTHEAST
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 50 of 100
UP
Screened
Mechanical
Area
ELEVATED POOL
DECK (+4')
RAMP UP
Elec/IDF
LockersTowels
Mech
Storage JAN
ENTRY (+4')
30' -6" x 33' -7"
WEIGHT / STRETCHING
10' -1" x 12' -8"
POOL EQUIPMENT
65' -0" x 36' -6"
POOL
37' -6" x 48' -4"
YOGA / MEDITATION LAWN
ELEV. OVER RUN SLOPEPARAPET HEIGHT - 33'-0"
INTERNAL DRAINAGE
SYSTEM
SHADE CANOPY BELOW
17' -7" x 22' -11"
GROUP FITNESS
48' -2" x 29' -10"
CARDIO
OPEN TO BELOW
PARAPET HEIGHT - 10'-0"
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:24 PMA28
FITNESS BUILDING &
TERRACE
221570
Author Checker
04/07/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1/8" = 1'-0"A28
1 BUILDING PLAN - FITNESS LEVEL 1
1/8" = 1'-0"A28
3 ROOF PLAN - FITNESS
1/8" = 1'-0"A28
2 BUILDING PLAN - FITNESS LEVEL 2
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 51 of 100
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 4'-0"
T.O. OVERRUN
EL- 33'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 19'-6"
T.O. GRADE
EL- 0'-0"
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 4'-0"
T.O. OVERRUN
EL- 33'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 19'-6"
T.O. GRADE
EL- 0'-0"
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
T.O. ROOF
EL- 30'-6"
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 4'-0"
T.O. OVERRUN
EL- 33'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 19'-6"
T.O. GRADE
EL- 0'-0"
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
T.O. ROOF
30'-6"
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 4'-0"
T.O. OVERRUN
EL- 33'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 19'-6"
T.O. GRADE
EL- 0'-0"
ELEVATOR OVERRUN
T.O. ROOF
EL- 30'-6"
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:26 PMA30
BUILDING ELEVATIONS -
FITNESS
221570
Author Checker
06/03/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
FITNESS - NORTH ELEVATION
FITNESS - SOUTH ELEVATION
FITNESS - WEST ELEVATION
FITNESS - EAST ELEVATION.
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 52 of 100
A
B DE
BC D
A
E
BD C
A
BABE
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:26 PMA31
COLORED ELEVATIONS -
FITNESS
221570
Author Checker
04/07/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
FITNESS - WEST ELEVATION
FITNESS - SOUTH ELEVATION
FITNESS - NORTH ELEVATION
FITNESS - EAST ELEVATION
STUCCO
BASIS OF DESIGN COLOR:
BM SAND DOLLAR
B
ALUMINUM ACCENTS
COLOR: BRONZED
MANUFACTURED STONE
TEXTURE: ROCKFACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
C
STUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM WAYNESBORO TAUPEA
METAL PANEL
COLOR 1:DARK BRONZEE
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 53 of 100
1:3FRANK SINATRA DRIVEADJACENT PROPERTY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 6' OPAQUE WALL LEVEL 3 SIGHT LINELEVEL 2 SIGHT LINE33' - 6"13' - 0"41' - 1"34' - 7"17' - 4"34' - 6"41' - 6"199' - 0"3 .3 °LOT 12279.9 FTBUILDING 2278.1 FT10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"1:3PORTOLA AVENUEADJACENT PROPERTY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 6' OPAQUE WALL 33' - 6"28.5 - 30.5 FTLEVEL 3 SIGHT LINELEVEL 2 SIGHT LINE24' - 1"41' - 6"2' - 1"55' - 0"34' - 2"229' - 11"2 .8 °BUILDING 8274.9 FT10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"LOT 19272.2 FT12' - 0"12' - 0"PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of California10/3/2022 3:44:05 PMA32SITE SECTIONS221570AuthorChecker05/06/22Frank Sinatra & PortolaFrank Sinatra &PortolaPalm Desert, CALAND USESUBMITAL06/07/20221/8" = 1'-0"A321STREET SECTION THROUGH FRANK SINATRA DRIVE1/8" = 1'-0"A322STREET SECTION THROUGH PORTOLA AVENo. Description Date1 REVISED SUBMITTAL8/1/222 REVISED SUBMITTAL10/3/22Page 54 of 100
20' - 6"VARIES
10' - 6" TYP.11' - 8"1' - 8"10' - 0"11' - 8"10' - 9"0.5
12
STUCCO
COLOR: BOD BM DOVE WHITE
METAL COPING:
COLOR: BRONZE
VARIES
19' - 0"METAL ROOF10' - 0" CLEAR19' - 0"11' - 4"10' - 0" CLEARVARIES
24' - 0"11' - 7"3' - 6"5' - 0"8' - 0"STUCCO
COLOR: BOD BM DOVE WHITE
TRELLIS ABOVE9' - 4"TRELLIS ABOVE
STUCCO
BOD: BM DOVE WHITE
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:34 PMA33
GARAGE, CARPORT, &
TRASH ENCLOSURE PLANS
221570
Author Checker
05/03/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1/4" = 1'-0"A33
1 GARAGE PLAN
1/4" = 1'-0"A33
2 GARAGE FRONT
1/4" = 1'-0"A33
3 GARAGE SIDES
1/4" = 1'-0"A33
4 CAR PORT PLAN
1/4" = 1'-0"A33
5 CAR PORT SIDE
1/4" = 1'-0"A33
6 CAR PORT FRONT
1/4" = 1'-0"A33
7 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN
1/4" = 1'-0"A33
8 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE
1/4" = 1'-0"A33
9 TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 55 of 100
10' - 5"19' - 5"1' - 11"11' - 6"
MANUFACTURED STONE
ROCK FACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
STUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN"
BM DOVE WHITE 8' - 2"7' - 1"4' - 5"6"
MANUFACTURED STONE
ROCK FACE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
STUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN"
BM DOVE WHITE
10' - 5"4' - 0"8' - 2"4' - 0"
30' - 0" TYP. SCPACING
4' - 0"2' - 0"6' - 0"CMU PLASTER BLOCK WALL
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM PALM DESERT TAN
WROUGHT IORN
METAL PICKET
COLOR: BLACK
2' - 0" TYP.
PRECAST COLUMN CAP
6' - 0"WROUGHT IORN
METAL PICKET
COLOR: BLACK
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:35 PMA34
SITE SIGNAGE & FENCE
SECTION ELEVATIONS
221570
Author Checker
06/01/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1/2" = 1'-0"A34
1 MONUMENT SIGN @ PORTOLA & FRANK SINATRA - FRONT
1/2" = 1'-0"A34
2 MONUMENT SIGN @ PORTOLA ENTRY - FRONT
1/2" = 1'-0"A34
3 MONUMENT SIGN @ PORTOLA & FRANK SINATRA - SIDE
1/2" = 1'-0"A34
4 MONUMENT SIGN @ PORTOLA ENTRY - SIDE
1/2" = 1'-0"A34
5 STREET PERIMITER FENCE SECTION ELEVATION #1
1/2" = 1'-0"A34
6 INTERIOR PERIMETER FENCE SECTION ELEVAITON #2
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 56 of 100
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:35 PMA35
MATERIAL BOARD
221570
Author Checker
05/05/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
MANUFACTURED STONE
COLOR: LIGHT GREY
STONE DIMENSIONS 9"x18"
STUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM WAYNESBORO TAUPE
STUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM DOVE WHITE
METAL PANEL & ACCENTS
COLOR: ANODIZED BRONZE
STUCCO
COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:
BM PALM DESERT TAN
STUCCO
BASIS OF DESIGN COLOR:
BM SAND DOLLAR
METAL PANEL:
COLOR: DARK BRONZE
PAINTED METAL TRELLIS
COLOR: BRONZE
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
WINDOW TRIM
COLOR: BRONZE
Page 57 of 100
4"4"
FILL CAVITY WITH BATT
INSULATION -TYPICAL
FLEXILE FALSHING BACK
WRAP AROUND WOOD
HEADER AND SEAL
5/8" GYP BOARD
STUCCO -SEE EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS FOR
FINISH AND COLOR
18 GA PREFINISHED SHEET
METAL HEADER TRIM WITH
18 GA DROP LEG
CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT
BETWEEN PREFIN METAL FLASHING
AND WALL -JAMBS AND HEAD ONLY
NO SEALANT AT FLASHING
TO ALLOW FOR DRAINAGE
MEMBRANE FLASHING LAP OVER
METAL FLASHING -EXTEND
BEYOND OUTER EDGES OF JAMB
AND BEYOND ANY TRIM
AIR BARRIER LAP OVER
FLEXIBLE FLASHING AND SEAL
BUILDING PAPER CONTINUOUS
OVER AIR BARRIER
METAL PANEL -SEE EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS FOR COLOR
FILL CAVITY WITH BATT
INSULATION -TYPICAL
FLEXILE FALSHING BACK
WRAP AROUND WOOD
HEADER AND SEAL
5/8" GYP BOARD
CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT
BETWEEN PREFIN METAL FLASHING
AND WALL -JAMBS AND HEAD ONLY
2-2X LEDGERS CONTINUOUS AT
FURRING WALL -NOTCH OUT FURRING
WALL STUDS AND ATTACH LEDGERS
TO FURRING WALL PANEL, THEN
INSTALL FURRING WALL AND LEDGER
ASSEMBLY TO STRUCTURAL WALL STUDS
8"
CONTINUOUS FLASHING
STUCCO -SEE EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS FOR
FINISH AND COLOR
AIR BARRIER LAP OVER
FLEXIBLE FLASHING AND SEAL
BUILDING PAPER CONTINUOUS
OVER AIR BARRIER
STUCCO SOFFT
FILL CAVITY WITH BATT
INSULATION -TYPICAL
FLEXILE FALSHING BACK
WRAP AROUND WOOD
HEADER AND SEAL
5/8" GYP BOARD
CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT
BETWEEN PREFIN METAL FLASHING
AND WALL -JAMBS AND HEAD ONLY
STUCCO -SEE EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS FOR
FINISH AND COLOR
AIR BARRIER LAP OVER
FLEXIBLE FLASHING AND SEAL
BUILDING PAPER CONTINUOUS
OVER AIR BARRIER
10"
2-2X LEDGERS CONTINUOUS AT
FURRING WALL -NOTCH OUT FURRING
WALL STUDS AND ATTACH LEDGERS
TO FURRING WALL PANEL, THEN
INSTALL FURRING WALL AND LEDGER
ASSEMBLY TO STRUCTURAL WALL STUDS
CONTINUOUS FLASHING
STUCCO SOFFT
3
A51
2
A51
4
A51 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"A51
6
A51
6
A51
6
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 32'-0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"A51
5
A51
7
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 32'-0"
6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. ROOF
EL- 32'-0"
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:36 PMA51
MISC DETAILS
221570
Author Checker
07/29/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
3" = 1'-0"A51
6 DETAIL @ EXTRUDED METAL TRIM
3" = 1'-0"A51
5 DETAIL @ RECESSED WINDOW 8"
3" = 1'-0"A51
7 DETAIL @ RECESSED WINDOW 10"
3" = 1'-0"A51
1 TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL WALK UP FACADE WINDOW CONDITIONS
1/2" = 1'-0"A51
3 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 2
1/2" = 1'-0"A51
2 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 1
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
1/2" = 1'-0"A51
4 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 3
Page 73 of 100
4
A52
2
A52
3
A52 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"A51
6
A51
6
A51
6
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"A52
5
T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"T.O. LEVEL 1
EL- 0'-0"
T.O. LEVEL 3
EL- 21'-4"
T.O. LEVEL 2
EL- 10'-8"
T.O. PARAPET
EL- 36'-4"
FILL CAVITY WITH BATT
INSULATION -TYPICAL
FLEXILE FALSHING BACK
WRAP AROUND WOOD
HEADER AND SEAL
5/8" GYP BOARD
STUCCO -SEE EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS FOR
FINISH AND COLOR
AIR BARRIER LAP OVER
FLEXIBLE FLASHING AND SEAL
BUILDING PAPER CONTINUOUS
OVER AIR BARRIER
2-2X LEDGERS CONTINUOUS AT
FURRING WALL -NOTCH OUT FURRING
WALL STUDS AND ATTACH LEDGERS
TO FURRING WALL PANEL, THEN
INSTALL FURRING WALL AND LEDGER
ASSEMBLY TO STRUCTURAL WALL STUDS
10"
PREFINISHED SHEET METAL
DRIP FLAHSING
COLOR: TO MATCH WINDOW TRIM
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:36 PMA52
MISC DETAILS
221570
Author Checker
10/03/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
No. Description Date
1 1/2" = 1'-0"A52
1 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY FACADE WINDOW CONDITIONS
1/2" = 1'-0"A52
2 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 2 Copy 1
1/2" = 1'-0"A52
3 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 1 Copy 1
1/2" = 1'-0"A52
4 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 3 Copy 1
3" = 1'-0"A52
5 DETAIL @ RECESSED WINDOW 10" MULTI
Page 74 of 100
WDFRIG
DW
WD
FRIG
DW
WDFRIG
DW
W D
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIGFRIG
FRIGFRIG
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
1. APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS
A. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
B. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
C. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
D. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
E. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
F. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
G. 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
H. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
BUILDING CODE REQUIRMENTS
T.D. 170'-0"
T.D. 185'-6"
UNIT
B2
UNIT
B2
UNIT
B2
UNIT
B2
AREA PER LEVEL: 10,752 SQFT/LEVEL * 3 LEVELS = 32,256 SQFT
UNIT
C7
UNIT
C7
UNIT
C7
UNIT
C7
EXIT SEPERATION47' - 1"UNIT
B4
T.D. 133'-0"
UNIT
B4
UNIT
B4
UNIT
B4 UNIT
C3
UNIT
C3
UNIT
C3
UNIT
C3
T.D. 156'-0"
AREA PER LEVEL: 10,833 SQFT/LEVEL * 3 LEVELS = 32,499 SQFTEXIT SEPERATION56' - 3"ELECUTILITYALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R
ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE 60' HEIGHT
HEIGHT PROVIDED 37' HEIGHT
TABLE 504.4, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R
ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE 3 STORIES
STORIES PROVIDED 3 STORIES
TABLE 506.2, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R At= 7,000 SQFT
PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2
Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa
Aa = {7,000 + [7,000 x 0.75] x 3
Aa= 36,750 SQFT (12,250 SQFT/STORY)
SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS AN NFPA 13R IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC SECTION 903.3.1
CODE CONSIDERATIONS - BUILDING TYPE A,B,C,D
BUILDING CLASSIFICATION:
Dwelling units and related spaces R-2 (Primary Occupation Class)
Construction Types:
Type VB
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:40 PMA53
PRELIMINARY CODE &
AREA CALCUALTIONS -
TYPE A, B BUILDINGS
221570
Author Checker
05/06/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
3/32" = 1'-0"A53
1 BUILDING TYPE A - LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"A53
2 BUILDING TYPE B - LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 75 of 100
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW WDFRIG
DW
WD
FRIG
DWWDFRIG
DW
W D WDFRIG
DW
W D
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIG
DW
FRIGDWW D
1. APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS
A. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
B. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
C. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
D. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
E. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
F. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
G. 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
H. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
BUILDING CODE REQUIRMENTS
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R
ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE 60' HEIGHT
HEIGHT PROVIDED 37' HEIGHT
TABLE 504.4, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R
ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE 3 STORIES
STORIES PROVIDED 3 STORIES
TABLE 506.2, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R At= 7,000 SQFT
PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2
Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa
Aa = {7,000 + [7,000 x 0.75] x 3
Aa= 36,750 SQFT (12,250 SQFT/STORY)
SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS AN NFPA 13R IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC SECTION 903.3.1
CODE CONSIDERATIONS - BUILDING TYPE A,B,C,D
BUILDING CLASSIFICATION:
Dwelling units and related spaces R-2 (Primary Occupation Class)
Construction Types:
Type VB
T.D. 181'-6"
UNIT
B5
AREA PER LEVEL: 10,300 SQFT/LEVEL * 3 LEVELS = 30,900 SQFT
UNIT
B5
UNIT
B5
UNIT
B5
UNIT
C2
UNIT
C2UNIT
C2
UNIT
C2
T.D. 172'-9"MIN 35.5'EXIT SEPERATION 48' - 9"UNIT
B2
T.D. 196'-0"
UNIT
B2
UNIT
B2
UNIT
B2
UNIT
C7
UNIT
C7
UNIT
C9
T.D. 172'-0"
AREA PER LEVEL: 9,819 SQFT/LEVEL * 3 LEVELS = 29,457 SQFT
T.D. 170'-0"EXIT SEPERATION47' - 5"PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:44 PMA54
PRELIMINARY CODE &
AREA CALCULATIONS -
TYPE C, D BUILDINGS
221570
Author Checker
05/31/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
3/32" = 1'-0"A54
1 BUILDING TYPE C - LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"A54
2 BUILDING TYPE D - LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 76 of 100
DWDWDWDWWD WDWD WDDWDWWDDW
DW
DW1. APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS
A. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
B. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
C. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
D. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
E. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
F. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
G. 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
H. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
BUILDING CODE REQUIRMENTS
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
ABOVE GRADE LEVELS:
ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE VA, GROUP R2, NFPA 13
ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE 70' HEIGHT
HEIGHT PROVIDED 42' HEIGHT
TABLE 504.4, TYPE VA, GROUP R2, NFPA 13
ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE 4 STORIES
STORIES PROVIDED 3 STORIES
TABLE 506.2, TYPE VA, GROUP R2, NFPA R13 At= 36,000 SQFT
PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2
Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa
Aa = {36,000 + [12,000 x 0.75] x 3
Aa= 135,000 SQFT (45,000 SQFT/STORY)
BELOW GRADE LEVEL:
ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE I-A, GROUP S2, NFPA 13
ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE UNLIMITED HEIGHT
HEIGHT PROVIDED 11' HEIGHT
TABLE 504.4, TYPE I-A GROUP S2, NFPA 13
ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE UNLIMITED
TABLE 506.2, TYPE I-A, GROUP S2, NFPA R13 At= UNLIMITED
PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2
Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa
Aa= UNLIMITED
AREA CALCULATIONS - BUILDING TYPE E
BUILDING CLASSIFICATION:
Dwelling units and related spaces R-2 (Primary Occupation Class)
Amenity Spaces
less than 50 Occupants B
if 50 occupants or more A-3
Parking S-2
Construction Types:
Type I-A Level P1
Type VA Level 1-3
SPECIAL PROVISIONS:
Section 510.2 - Horizontal building separation allowance
Section 510.2 allows the basement and upper levels to be considered separate and distinct
buildings for the purpose of determining area and height limitations, provided:
a) The Level P1 Parking Garage is of Type I-A construction and is separated from the building
above with a horizontal assembly having a minimum of 3 hour fire-resistance rating.
b) Shafts and stairway enclosures shall be 2 hour rated.
The horizontal separation occurs at the Level 1 floor line.
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level P1PARKING S2 (TYPE 1-A)3-HR SEPARATION
RESIDENTIAL R2 (TYPE VA)
RESIDENTIAL R2 (TYPE VA)
RESIDENTIAL R2 (TYPE VA)
DIGRAMATIC BUILDING SECTION
VA AREA PER LEVEL 1: 41,966 SQFT/LEVEL
IA AREA PER LEVEL 1: 2,395 SQFT/LEVEL
3HR
SEPERATIONC.P. 112'T.D. 186'T.D. 124'T.D. 101'T.D. 172'VA AREA PER LEVEL 2 & 3: 44,361 SQFT/LEVELC.P. 112'T.D. 147'50' - 0" DEAD ENDT.D. 115'T.D. 109'43' - 3" DEAD ENDT.D. 178'C.P.
78'DEAD END15' - 5"IA AREA PER LEVEL P1: 58,827 SQFT/LEVEL
RAMP UP
TO LEVEL 1
EX IT SEP ER A TIO N 3 0 5' - 2"1/3 = 155' - 6"466' - 5"PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:53 PMA55
PRELIMINARY CODE &
AREA CALCUALTIONS -
TYPE E BUILDING
221570
Author Checker
05/08/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
1/32" = 1'-0"A55
1 BUILDING TYPE D - LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN
1/32" = 1'-0"A55
2 SECOND LEVEL CODE PLAN
1/32" = 1'-0"A55
3 ARC - CODE PLAN TYPE D LEVEL P1
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 77 of 100
UP
1. APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS
A. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
B. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
C. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
D. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
E. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS
F. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
G. 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
H. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
BUILDING CODE REQUIRMENTS
CLUB ROOM
CLUB ROOM
ENT. SUITE
ENT. SUITE
COWORKING
LOBBY/LOUNGE
LEASING
THEATER
POOL EQP.
MAINTENANCE
SCREENED
MECH.
GAMES/SPEAK EASY
PACKAGE
LEVEL 1 AREA: 17,311 SQFT
WEIGHTS/STRETCHING
POOL EQP
ELEC/IDF
EXTERIOR POOL
EXTERIOR POOL TERRACE (+4')
EXTERIOR YOGA/GOUP FITNESS LAWN
LEVEL 1 AREA: 2,553 SQFT EXTERIOR ENTRY TERRACE (+4')GROUP FITNESS
CARDIO EQP.
LEVEL 2 AREA: 2049 SQFT
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13
ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE 60' HEIGHT
HEIGHT PROVIDED 27' HEIGHT
TABLE 504.4, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13
ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE 2 STORIES
STORIES PROVIDED 1 STORY
TABLE 506.2, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13 At= 18,000 SQFT(PER STORY)
PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2
Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa
Aa = {18,000 + [18,000 x 0.75] x 1
Aa= 31,500 SQFT
ACTUAL BUILDING AREA: 17,311 SQFT
CODE CONSIDERATIONS - BUILDING TYPE F
BUILDING CLASSIFICATION:
A-3 (Primary Occupation Class)
Amenity Spaces
less than 50 Occupants B
if 50 occupants or more A-3
Construction Types:
Type VB
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA
ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13
ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE 60' HEIGHT
HEIGHT PROVIDED 33' HEIGHT
TABLE 504.4, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13
ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE 2 STORIES
STORIES PROVIDED 2 STORIES
TABLE 506.2, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13 At= 18,000 SQFT(PER STORY)
PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2
Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa
Aa = {18,000 + [18,000 x 0.75] x 2
Aa= 63,000 SQFT
ACTUAL BUILDING AREA: 4,602 SQFT
CODE CONSIDERATIONS - BUILDING TYPE G
BUILDING CLASSIFICATION:
Dwelling units and related spaces A-3 (Primary Occupation Class)
Amenity Spaces
less than 50 Occupants B
if 50 occupants or more A-3
Construction Types:
Type VB
PROJECT NUMBER
DRAWN BY CHECKED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE:
REVISIONS
KEY PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect
under the laws of the State of California
10/3/2022 3:10:57 PMA56
PRELIMINARY CODE &
AREA CALCUALTIONS -
TYPE F & G BUILDINGS
221570
Author Checker
05/08/22
Frank Sinatra & Portola
Frank Sinatra &
Portola
Palm Desert, CA
LAND USE
SUBMITAL
06/07/2022
3/32" = 1'-0"A56
2 BUILDING TYPE E - LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"A56
3 BUILDING TYPE F - LEVEL 1 CODE PLAN
3/32" = 1'-0"A56
4 BUILDING F LEVEL 2 CODE PLAN
No. Description Date
1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22
2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22
Page 78 of 100
PARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4P4P4P4P4P4P5P5P5P5P5P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLP4P4P4P4P4P4BLBLBLP4P4BLP4P4P4BLBLBLBLP4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4BLBLP4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLP4P4P4P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLP4P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLP5P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLP4SP4SP4SP4SBLBLBLBLBLBLP4P4P4P5P5P4SBLBL18.60.30.521.80.20.217.90.70.21.113.10.30.22.43.10.41.121.71.61.48.01.20.30.71.96.90.30.10.318.30.40.18.51.50.11.23.90.25.00.64.24.02.61.81.51.51.41.116.81.50.72.58.20.50.40.71.421.20.30.318.20.80.45.53.30.40.718.91.00.71.119.40.30.14.06.50.10.220.23.88.94.51.31.90.40.31.80.20.31.60.20.32.20.41.12.80.24.12.70.215.91.20.319.60.60.215.74.90.21.93.70.23.12.50.10.322.30.50.419.01.64.48.53.03.92.20.62.50.30.32.70.30.23.20.30.22.80.20.317.70.40.318.20.40.318.40.40.418.60.52.80.20.922.80.20.922.80.20.922.81.56.10.320.60.64.82.40.40.716.31.10.51.80.30.22.00.30.22.30.40.41.88.4 12.5 6.81.2 3.6 4.9 5.8 4.3 2.9 0.81.2 2.1 2.6 3.0 2.4 1.9 1.00.8 1.1 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.2 0.80.9 1.6 1.6 1.21.72.2 2.14.0 3.4 2.1 1.4 2.1 3.8 5.96.5 4.6 2.41.52.7 4.9 10.78.3 5.1 2.5 1.4 2.7 4.8 10.54.53.8 2.21.42.0 3.6 5.91.7 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.5 2.20.5 1.3 2.8 3.2 3.6 2.7 0.82.5 3.8 3.6 3.3 6.1 4.6 1.14.14.84.13.9 8.48.5 6.1 4.5 3.4 6.83.9 4.6 3.6 3.0 4.22.2 3.3 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.20.4 0.81.5 1.10.8 1.20.9 1.2 2.2 3.4 3.5 2.7 1.8 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.6 3.1 2.5 1.4 1.1 2.5 4.9 8.31.0 1.6 2.2 2.11.51.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.8 2.9 4.25.13.3 1.91.11.6 3.64.72.20.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.7 2.9 4.7 5.5 3.7 2.3 1.7 1.7 2.60.8 0.81.1 1.41.8 2.4 2.21.50.9 1.2 2.2 3.5 3.9 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.61.0 0.8 1.4 2.2 3.2 3.8 3.3 1.9 1.1 1.1 1.9 2.8 3.1 2.8 3.3 3.5 3.2 3.5 1.20.91.52.64.16.8 4.2 2.7 1.61.52.1 2.6 2.8 2.8 3.35.7 7.5 5.51.2 1.3 2.1 3.6 4.8 3.9 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.4 5.2 9.71.1 1.72.6 3.2 2.7 3.0 3.0 3.54.44.8 2.81.71.2 1.2 1.6 1.8 1.8 2.4 3.5 5.5 10.1 8.00.9 0.9 0.93.3 6.51.5 1.32.0 2.811.55.3 2.71.56.1 2.8 1.6 0.93.7 2.0 1.31.10.5 1.1 1.5 1.21.42.9 2.6 1.86.5 4.3 2.8 1.69.8 7.9 3.4 2.18.3 3.9 2.1 1.42.7 2.0 1.61.3 1.8 2.0 1.54.42.8 2.38.55.53.1 2.04.46.18.6 3.4 2.2 2.0 2.54.110.56.5 3.7 2.2 2.1 2.4 3.5 6.2 7.11.71.9 1.9 2.2 2.7 3.3 4.31.6 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 1.5 1.36.0 3.6 3.0 2.2 1.9 2.1 3.32.010.5 6.6 3.3 2.4 2.1 2.54.78.811.6 6.2 3.3 1.58.0 3.3 2.2 2.0 2.54.19.73.9 6.15.43.6 2.7 2.04.8 3.0 1.8 1.4 2.0 3.1 5.0 6.44.51.8 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 2.9 2.4 1.41.2 0.9 0.81.72.4 3.4 3.210.97.54.0 2.8 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.6 3.2 3.3 1.91.0 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.5 2.52.3 4.64.53.8 3.1 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.9 4.2 6.3 6.4 3.22.2 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.3 1.63.11.7 1.72.8 2.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.4 3.77.112.52.85.0 3.7 2.3 1.7 2.0 3.34.54.3 3.0 1.8 1.5 2.0 2.6 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.7 1.8 2.32.35.510.3 9.12.4 0.8 1.2 2.4 4.3 6.44.12.36.3 3.8 2.2 1.61.72.4 2.8 2.8 2.31.51.3 1.6 2.7 3.5 6.6 8.95.52.3 0.9 2.5 5.0 6.4 5.91.9 1.64.46.4 7.1 5.2 2.7 0.9 1.3 2.3 3.4 3.7 3.2 2.33.6 3.1 2.1 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.0 1.0 2.1 5.3 8.91.9 0.9 1.9 2.5 3.1 2.9 2.3 1.9 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.2 2.5 2.1 1.31.11.8 2.3 2.1 2.11.7 1.4 1.41.9 2.2 2.0 2.01.51.01.41.8 1.8 1.81.50.9 1.20.9 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.1 0.70.9 1.7 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.21.5 1.41.61.71.8 2.1 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.81.71.9 2.2 2.21.7 1.5 1.72.0 2.5 2.9 2.5 2.0 1.2 1.01.11.0 0.9 0.51.0 2.0 3.4 4.82.4 2.4 1.4 0.9 1.6 2.8 4.2 3.1 2.1 2.7 3.42.2 1.6 2.1 2.6 3.4 3.2 2.7 1.8 1.6 3.0 3.7 4.8 3.81.4 1.2 0.8 0.51.0 2.0 3.65.0 3.11.51.0 2.14.3 2.45.1 7.72.5 0.8 2.45.57.9 7.3 4.81.7 1.13.9 7.9 11.6 7.91.9 3.3 2.5 2.11.40.9 0.7 1.2 2.1 3.08.34.41.8 1.0 2.26.5 5.9 3.5 1.9 1.3 1.0 1.5 1.8 2.16.3 3.8 1.8 1.3 2.4 3.3 7.011.76.0 3.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.6 1.2 1.0 0.94.3 3.0 1.6 1.4 2.7 4.3 5.12.8 2.62.5 1.9 1.1 0.6 0.7 1.20.91.4 1.5 1.52.6 4.3 6.02.7 1.61.42.3 4.01.2 1.6 1.4 1.4 2.6 4.2 9.26.0 2.9 2.1 2.0 2.7 6.14.6 3.01.51.3 2.64.510.86.3 2.8 2.0 2.2 3.05.511.66.9 4.0 1.9 1.2 2.0 3.3 6.53.8 2.2 1.7 2.1 2.7 3.5 6.37.9 4.3 1.9 1.2 2.11.11.8 1.9 2.1 2.4 3.1 1.95.0 3.1 1.6 1.3 2.13.1 3.1 2.2 2.0 1.6 1.4 0.81.8 2.1 1.61.42.06.55.13.1 2.21.71.6 2.30.8 1.3 1.6 1.3 2.69.3 3.8 2.5 1.9 2.1 3.57.44.2 3.11.71.3 2.58.3 4.0 2.2 1.9 2.3 3.5 8.06.3 4.1 2.2 1.2 1.82.7 1.9 1.7 2.1 3.04.77.08.5 4.8 2.31.11.61.3 1.81.71.9 2.1 2.9 3.44.9 3.4 1.9 1.2 1.6 1.8 1.52.9 3.5 2.3 2.0 1.72.3 2.51.71.3 1.9 3.2 4.96.6 3.4 2.31.71.60.5 1.0 1.6 1.5 2.4 4.0 8.811.2 4.6 2.7 1.9 1.82.8 3.1 1.91.42.64.5 11.17.74.8 2.41.71.9 2.85.512.35.0 4.1 2.3 1.4 2.0 3.3 6.82.9 2.0 1.6 1.8 2.7 4.0 7.68.85.42.7 1.2 1.8 2.6 3.01.3 1.6 1.81.72.0 2.6 3.94.73.9 2.3 1.2 1.6 1.9 1.32.5 3.8 2.5 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.12.6 3.0 2.0 1.31.72.7 3.67.3 3.8 2.7 2.0 1.8 1.8 2.20.4 0.7 1.4 1.4 2.1 3.1 7.012.0 5.2 2.9 2.2 2.2 3.3 6.21.2 2.3 1.91.42.34.110.37.0 5.2 2.5 2.1 2.4 3.3 8.02.8 4.1 2.3 1.4 2.1 3.3 7.63.1 2.1 1.8 2.3 3.3 5.8 8.66.25.73.0 1.31.72.94.11.31.5 1.72.1 2.5 3.4 5.04.9 2.8 1.3 1.6 2.0 1.42.7 3.4 2.4 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.53.6 2.3 1.31.52.2 2.45.16.1 3.1 2.31.71.1 1.4 1.3 1.7 2.75.72.6 1.9 1.8 2.2 2.50.9 1.3 1.3 2.0 3.5 8.62.4 2.2 2.4 4.2 6.63.8 2.4 1.3 2.0 3.3 7.82.2 2.3 3.0 4.8 11.35.3 3.01.51.6 2.6 4.91.8 2.2 2.3 2.94.18.76.2 3.5 1.3 1.5 2.0 1.83.9 2.6 2.2 2.3 2.8 4.84.52.61.4 1.51.91.77.13.4 2.6 2.2 2.1 1.62.4 2.1 1.4 1.5 2.44.510.6 4.2 2.8 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.70.51.1 1.41.8 3.0 6.77.6 3.5 2.4 2.2 2.3 4.0 5.33.1 2.5 1.4 1.8 3.2 7.33.7 2.9 2.0 2.1 2.8 5.0 10.35.0 2.91.51.6 2.5 5.31.11.21.52.0 3.0 4.9 10.87.0 3.8 1.5 1.5 2.1 2.52.0 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.3 3.4 6.25.3 3.11.5 1.41.91.41.35.8 3.7 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.8 2.63.5 2.6 1.4 1.4 2.2 3.5 3.610.6 5.3 3.0 2.1 2.2 2.8 2.90.6 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.6 5.2 7.010.55.42.9 2.2 2.0 2.9 6.21.3 1.7 1.4 1.6 3.1 6.6 12.45.44.3 2.3 1.9 2.3 3.6 8.84.6 2.91.51.6 2.55.16.71.9 2.0 1.81.52.2 3.3 7.3 6.96.8 3.8 1.8 1.5 2.3 3.4 3.41.3 1.4 1.9 2.8 5.0 4.97.2 4.0 1.81.52.2 1.91.71.91.51.6 2.1 2.6 3.04.9 2.9 1.6 1.5 2.3 3.6 3.82.8 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.5 2.61.6 2.01.51.6 2.63.3 1.8 0.9 0.60.9 1.4 1.6 1.7 3.13.8 0.8 2.1 4.9 6.6 6.9 5.0 2.4 2.4 5.9 9.3 8.85.41.8 0.7 2.85.5 7.56.4 4.2 1.5 2.0 4.8 6.9 7.0 5.0 2.1 1.44.4 7.53.3 1.33.2 1.8 0.8 0.73.84.53.4 2.14.3 3.01.71.6 2.5 5.02.0 1.0 1.9 2.5 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.9 3.8 2.9 1.9 1.3 2.2 2.6 3.4 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.8 3.32.6 1.62.31.50.8 0.72.6 2.6 2.31.76.4 3.9 2.0 1.3 2.2 3.5 3.6 1.6 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.3 0.98.44.52.0 0.9 1.21.41.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.91.71.6 1.61.71.9 2.0 1.91.5 1.15.0 3.2 1.7 0.8 0.5 0.9 1.9 2.6 3.3 3.1 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.3 2.6 2.1 2.0 2.4 2.7 3.3 2.7 2.3 2.0 2.2 2.5 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 3.3 2.8 2.4 2.0 2.1 2.5 3.2 3.1 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.4 2.7 3.3 2.6 2.3 1.22.4 2.41.50.7 1.07.3 6.74.71.91.7 4.46.3 6.95.12.51.43.65.77.3 5.6 3.56.2 4.2 2.2 3.35.57.3 5.8 3.81.42.35.16.8 6.44.51.81.74.3 6.3 7.0 5.2 2.5 1.3 3.65.77.3 5.6 3.50.6 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.63.6 1.3 2.1 5.2 10.0 8.4 4.6 1.5 1.54.47.9 10.45.42.2 1.3 3.3 6.3 12.1 6.2 3.23.3 3.11.7 1.12.0 3.4 8.05.6 3.9 2.0 1.0 2.1 3.9 9.68.8 5.0 2.3 1.0 1.9 3.0 6.65.2 3.7 2.0 1.1 1.6 2.6 3.43.0 2.9 1.8 1.0 1.6 2.0 1.30.4 0.8 1.4 1.2 1.5 2.3 2.91.52.3 1.81.1 1.72.6 5.83.8 3.9 2.0 1.0 1.8 3.4 8.28.15.42.7 0.9 1.8 3.0 6.95.4 4.72.5 1.0 1.4 2.5 4.30.8 0.9Luminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyLabelDescriptionLLFLuminaireLumensLuminaireWatts125BLLED BOLLARD0.950209418.4381P4LED AREA POST LIGHT TYPE IV DIST0.9501071510627P4SLED AREA POST TOP TYPE IV DIST HSS0.950604210613P5LED AREA POST TOP TYPE V DIST0.95011181106Calculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinPed Path 1IlluminanceFc4.1621.80.141.60218.00Ped Path 2IlluminanceFc4.6221.20.146.20212.00Ped Path 3IlluminanceFc3.7822.30.137.80223.00Ped Path 4IlluminanceFc4.0422.80.220.20114.00Street Parking 2IlluminanceFc3.2612.50.48.1531.25Street Parking 3IlluminanceFc2.9312.80.214.6564.00Street Parking 4IlluminanceFc2.4110.90.38.0336.33Street-Parking-1IlluminanceFc3.0912.50.47.7331.25FRANK SINATRA - PORTOLAMAINTAINED HORIZONTAL ILLUMINANCE CALCULATIONS AT FINISH GRADEREVISED 9-29-22Drawn BySheet No.Job No.ScaleTitleChecked ByIssueNo.DateDateCommercial Lighting Industries81161 Indio Boulevard, Indio, CA 92201Tel: 800-755-0155 | Fax: 760-262-3940ALL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY OFCOMMERCIAL LIGHTING IND. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.ALL MEASUREMENTS MUST BE CHECKED ON SITE BYTHE CONTRACTORS AND ANY DISCREPANCIES BROUGHTTO THE ATTENTION OF THE DESIGNER OR ARCHITECT.FRANK SINATRA - PORTOLA
Page 79 of 100
Luminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyLabelDescriptionLLFLuminaireLumensLuminaireWatts125BLLED BOLLARD0.950209418.4381P4LED AREA POST LIGHT TYPE IV DIST0.9501071510627P4SLED AREA POST TOP TYPE IV DIST HSS0.950604210613P5LED AREA POST TOP TYPE V DIST0.95011181106Calculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinPed Path 1IlluminanceFc4.1621.80.141.60218.00Ped Path 2IlluminanceFc4.6221.20.146.20212.00Ped Path 3IlluminanceFc3.7822.30.137.80223.00Ped Path 4IlluminanceFc4.0422.80.220.20114.00Street Parking 2IlluminanceFc3.2612.50.48.1531.25Street Parking 3IlluminanceFc2.9312.80.214.6564.00Street Parking 4IlluminanceFc2.4110.90.38.0336.33Street-Parking-1IlluminanceFc3.0912.50.47.7331.25P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4BLBLBLBLP4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLP4P4P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4P4SP4P4P5P4SP5P5P5P5P5P4SP4SP4S18.91.00.71.119.40.30.14.06.50.10.220.29.00.20.717.90.30.221.20.90.11.79.60.10.318.30.50.13.63.30.10.213.40.90.219.42.60.30.815.03.11.31.712.40.40.317.80.50.24.23.41.0 8.6 5.7 3.3 1.84.6 3.9 2.2 1.2 0.62.2 2.2 1.7 2.0 3.61.2 1.4 1.9 1.7 2.74.73.00.5 3.4 2.8 2.0 2.5 4.8 8.34.9 4.8 3.1 1.8 3.34.52.41.6 7.2 3.7 1.9 2.0 2.9 1.52.3 1.7 1.3 0.8 1.02.4 2.6 1.7 2.9 4.61.4 8.6 4.9 3.2 2.2 2.9 5.2 8.32.9 4.8 5.0 3.5 2.1 2.0 2.8 4.6 6.41.6 2.9 2.82.0 2.2 3.1 3.9 2.60.4 1.9 2.62.5 2.6 2.1 0.71.2 4.3 2.6 1.0 2.05.8 3.4 2.7 2.0 1.7 2.71.6 5.5 3.1 1.1 1.110.7 4.4 2.7 2.5 3.2 4.93.1 6.1 3.5 1.1 1.07.1 5.3 2.9 2.1 3.15.48.61.3 4.5 2.6 1.1 0.83.4 2.3 1.3 2.0 3.8 5.00.6 2.1 2.1 1.3 1.22.7 1.9 1.0 1.0 2.1 3.1 1.60.2 0.6 1.4 1.9 1.92.6 1.4 0.9 1.4 1.3 0.63.2 2.8 2.0 2.23.4 2.1 1.2 1.1 1.7 3.04.55.0 3.2 1.9 1.81.1 1.9 3.0 5.57.1 3.9 1.5 1.32.54.2 3.4 3.2 4.9 6.95.3 3.1 1.4 1.12.1 2.2 2.4 4.5 12.8 8.2 4.2 2.9 3.43.5 2.7 1.4 1.12.1 2.4 3.1 6.4 6.74.52.5 2.2 2.50.7 1.25.8 4.2 2.6 3.4 2.8 2.8 1.9 1.1 1.21.8 2.3 3.15.511.6 7.3 3.8 2.9 2.4 1.8 1.3 0.7 0.44.9 3.3 3.2 5.3 4.9 3.7 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.47.54.1 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.3 1.5 1.0 0.66.9 3.9 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.44.6 2.91.0 0.61.5 2.21.0 2.01.0 2.00.8 1.9 3.40.65.2 1.9 1.22.310.3 8.94.42.7 1.7 2.34.48.54.24.54.0 2.8 2.0 1.31.73.75.12.85.0 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.3 1.1 2.0 3.1 2.910.9 8.4 4.3 2.9 2.3 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.3 1.31.70.6 0.65.14.74.0 2.8 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.6 3.3 2.7 1.7 1.2 1.5 2.1 3.72.6 2.7 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.8 2.7 3.95.43.6 2.2 1.3 1.2 2.4 4.3 7.02.3 2.6 3.9 3.9 2.5 2.2 2.2 1.7 1.2 1.0 1.5 2.6 4.25.73.9 2.5 1.5 0.9 2.0 4.2 7.22.1 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.6 2.31.71.01.11.9 3.1 3.6 2.9 2.1 1.3 0.71.12.9 4.0 4.01.8 1.2 1.3 2.2 3.1 3.8 3.5 2.2 1.2 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.2 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.8 1.5 2.6 1.30.9 1.3 2.3 3.7 6.6 4.8 2.91.71.0 0.9 1.2 1.31.1 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.11.2 1.3 0.91.51.2 1.1 1.9 3.24.53.9 2.7 1.7 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.7 2.3 2.4 1.8 1.2 1.5 2.8 4.6 0.80.91.42.3 2.9 2.3 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.71.11.9 2.9 3.8 3.7 2.41.41.2 2.4 4.8 8.60.9 1.0 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.2 2.1 3.5 5.9 5.3 3.2 1.8 1.0 1.7 4.0 5.8 1.00.8 0.8 1.01.11.2 1.6 1.9 1.61.11.01.73.0 4.34.12.9 1.8 1.0 1.0 2.3 3.4 2.90.9 0.6 0.9 1.5 2.1 2.7 3.1 2.4 1.4 0.9 1.3 2.2 2.8 2.4 1.9 1.4 0.9 0.7 1.4 1.8 0.6 0.30.6 0.9 1.8 3.04.4 5.13.2 1.91.11.01.4 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.10.91.1 1.41.9 3.41.0 0.9 1.7 3.0 4.95.53.5 2.2 1.2 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.9 1.6 1.1 1.4 2.74.72.50.9 1.2 2.2 3.4 3.5 2.7 1.81.10.7 0.7 0.91.42.0 2.6 3.1 2.51.4 1.12.5 4.9 8.31.0 1.6 2.2 2.1 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.8 2.9 4.2 5.1 3.3 1.9 1.1 1.6 3.64.72.20.9 1.0 1.2 1.31.1 1.1 1.41.3 1.0 1.01.72.94.7 5.53.7 2.31.7 1.72.60.8 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.4 2.2 1.5 0.9 1.2 2.2 3.5 3.9 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.69.90.6 1.7 3.0 5.0 6.41.2 2.1 3.2 3.29.70.8 1.7 2.7 2.9 4.31.4 3.84.54.01.91.12.2 2.9 6.56.5 3.71.52.2 2.3 2.4 1.81.7 1.40.7 1.6 2.85.511.310.6 5.9 3.3 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.11.3 2.4 3.4 5.93.14.74.2 3.3 2.3 1.9 1.61.71.8 2.51.3 1.9 2.3 3.2 2.59.2 5.3 3.3 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.3 3.3 6.52.0 1.9 2.1 2.7 2.86.4 8.8 6.2 3.3 3.1 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.3 1.9 1.8 4.9 8.22.6 2.1 1.9 2.2 3.35.9 3.8 3.4 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.3 3.0 3.8 4.3 2.4 1.38.5 4.3 2.9 1.9 2.04.3 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.2 5.2 9.4 7.911.9 5.6 2.5 1.6 1.9 2.9 3.9 6.84.72.4 2.4 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.2 3.8 6.75.2 2.81.71.8 2.0 2.5 3.4 2.6 2.5 2.9 4.27.17.34.11.9 1.4 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.87.0 11.72.0 3.3 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.24.2 6.4 3.8 2.9 2.2 2.1 3.7 9.211.8 6.0 3.0 2.2 2.5 3.4 6.5 8.66.7 3.1 2.0 2.2 2.8 3.3 5.03.9 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.4 1.9 1.31.4 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.43.3 4.3 2.7 2.4 2.1 2.34.47.88.54.53.1 2.2 2.4 3.8 9.312.4 6.2 2.7 2.0 2.4 3.25.16.85.8 3.1 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.9 3.42.11.52.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.81.9 3.0 2.3 2.2 2.0 2.54.44.65.53.3 2.6 2.2 2.34.410.710.9 5.2 2.9 2.3 2.7 3.86.2 2.7 2.04.3 2.4 1.9 2.11.3 2.1 2.03.2 3.8 2.5 1.97.3 3.9 2.612.15.42.5 1.55.72.91.52.5 1.4 1.2 1.10.61.5 1.42.1 3.2 2.1 1.56.1 3.4 2.211.5 5.3 2.7 1.56.1 2.8 1.6 0.93.7 2.0 1.3 1.10.51.1 1.51.2FRANK SINATRA - PORTOLAMAINTAINED HORIZONTAL ILLUMINANCE CALCULATIONS AT FINISH GRADEREVISED 9-29-22Street-Parking-1IlluminanceFc3.0912.50.47.7331.25Drawn BySheet No.Job No.ScaleTitleChecked ByIssueNo.DateDateCommercial Lighting Industries81161 Indio Boulevard, Indio, CA 92201Tel: 800-755-0155 | Fax: 760-262-3940ALL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY OFCOMMERCIAL LIGHTING IND. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.ALL MEASUREMENTS MUST BE CHECKED ON SITE BYTHE CONTRACTORS AND ANY DISCREPANCIES BROUGHTTO THE ATTENTION OF THE DESIGNER OR ARCHITECT.FRANK SINATRA - PORTOLA
Page 80 of 100
From:CouncilMeeting Comments
To:alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com
Cc:Alan Vanderpool; Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone
Subject:RE: Opposition to HD Project
Date:Monday, August 22, 2022 11:43:12 AM
Good morning Mr. Vanderpool,
Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed
to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of
the public record.
Kind regards,
Niamh M. Ortega
Deputy City Clerk
Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487
nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org
From: alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com <alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 8:46 AM
To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org>
Cc: Alan Vanderpool <pattivanderpool@yahoo.com>
Subject: Opposition to HD Project
We strongly oppose the high density, 3-story, apartment complex proposed to be built
at Frank Sinatra and Portola for the following reasons:
1. Obstruction of our beautiful mountain views because of the 3 story profile of the structures and
mass of the complex.
2. Extremely high density housing inconsistent with the existing residential communities in the area.
3. Marked negative impact on traffic (650 proposed parking spaces) and increase in noise impacting
the quiet community we live in today. The entrance to the property of 300+ units is directly across
from our residences.
3. Invasion of privacy. Looking into residences and down into yards.
4. Boxy 3 story buildings inconsistent with the existing luxury housing surrounding the area. Desert
Willow Golf Course and resort-style communities already exist in that intersection. Those
developments are single and two story.
Page 81 of 100
5. Too close to the street, not adequately set back from the street. No walls for sound mitigation.
6. Such a large apartment complex would create a transient community of perhaps 600 plus people
surrounded by an otherwise stable population.
Please deny this project as presently proposed for all of the serious concerns identified.
Respectfully,
Alan and Patti VANDERPOOL
501 Retreat Circle Palm Desert 92260
Page 82 of 100
From:CouncilMeeting Comments
To:alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com
Cc:Alan Vanderpool; Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone
Subject:RE: Opposition to HD Project
Date:Monday, August 22, 2022 11:43:12 AM
Good morning Mr. Vanderpool,
Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed
to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of
the public record.
Kind regards,
Niamh M. Ortega
Deputy City Clerk
Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487
nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org
From: alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com <alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 8:46 AM
To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org>
Cc: Alan Vanderpool <pattivanderpool@yahoo.com>
Subject: Opposition to HD Project
We strongly oppose the high density, 3-story, apartment complex proposed to be built
at Frank Sinatra and Portola for the following reasons:
1. Obstruction of our beautiful mountain views because of the 3 story profile of the structures and
mass of the complex.
2. Extremely high density housing inconsistent with the existing residential communities in the area.
3. Marked negative impact on traffic (650 proposed parking spaces) and increase in noise impacting
the quiet community we live in today. The entrance to the property of 300+ units is directly across
from our residences.
3. Invasion of privacy. Looking into residences and down into yards.
4. Boxy 3 story buildings inconsistent with the existing luxury housing surrounding the area. Desert
Willow Golf Course and resort-style communities already exist in that intersection. Those
developments are single and two story.
Page 83 of 100
5. Too close to the street, not adequately set back from the street. No walls for sound mitigation.
6. Such a large apartment complex would create a transient community of perhaps 600 plus people
surrounded by an otherwise stable population.
Please deny this project as presently proposed for all of the serious concerns identified.
Respectfully,
Alan and Patti VANDERPOOL
501 Retreat Circle Palm Desert 92260
Page 84 of 100
From:CouncilMeeting Comments
To:Sue Hammans
Cc:Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone
Subject:RE: No 394 Walk-up apartments on Portola/Frank Sinatra by HD
Date:Monday, August 22, 2022 11:45:33 AM
Good morning Mr. and Mrs. Hammans,
Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed to the City
Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of the public record.
Kind regards,
Niamh M. Ortega
Deputy City Clerk
Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487
nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Sue Hammans <suehammans@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 4:10 PM
To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org>
Subject: No 394 Walk-up apartments on Portola/Frank Sinatra by HD
Members of the City Council of Palm Desert:
Steve and Sue Hammans
1801 Retreat Circle
Palm Desert
The Retreat at Desert Willow
We love Palm Desert, if we wanted to live in Indio, Cathedral City or Desert Hot Springs we would have built a
home there.
We chose Palm Desert because of the beautiful Golf Courses, views of the mountains, and the feel of this amazing
location.
We have enough manufactured homes and now this project doesn’t fit our upscale Palm Desert.
The traffic all hours of the day and night will be ridiculous.
No vested interest renters with three story boxes over looking our properties is not a good idea, these proposed
apartments will not fit our environment.
Come on Palm Desert, we don’t need this. Let’s have our one story or two story homes in this area. We want
growth, but, not at this cost to the neighborhood!
Steve and Sue Hammans
Sent from my iPad
Page 85 of 100
From:CouncilMeeting Comments
To:Cynthia Rankowitz
Cc:Marshall Rankowitz; Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone
Subject:RE: HD Portola – Frank Sinatra project.
Date:Monday, August 22, 2022 11:46:28 AM
Attachments:We sent you safe versions of your files.msg
Good morning Mr. and Mrs. Rankowitz,
Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed
to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of
the public record.
Kind regards,
Niamh M. Ortega
Deputy City Clerk
Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487
nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org
From: Cynthia Rankowitz <ccilwik@snet.net>
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 4:12 PM
To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org>
Cc: Marshall Rankowitz <mmrankowitz@gmail.com>
Subject: HD Portola – Frank Sinatra project.
Mimecast Attachment Protection was unable to create safe copies of your attachments.
My husband, Marshall, & I are residents of The Retreat. We are strongly opposed to the dense, three
story apartment complex being planned for the vacant lot on the corner of Frank Sinatra and
Portola. We are in complete agreement with the two attached letters which you received from our
neighbors, Don & Lisa Mess and Jeff & Cam Cameron. We hope that the council will take into
consideration the negative impact this proposed project will have on the residents of The
Retreat and our neighbors on living on Frank Sinatra.
Marshall & Cynthia Rankowitz
102 Retreat Circle
Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail for iPad
Page 86 of 100
From:Doug Hoekstra
To:Kevin Swartz
Subject:For Consideration
Date:Monday, August 22, 2022 8:30:12 PM
To: Kevin Swartz
Thank you for taking time in the meetings to explain the proposed Hayes Dietrich development along Portola in
Palm Desert. We have three main concerns regarding the development:
· The obstruction of the beautiful Mountain View’s
· The landscaping and esthetics of the development along Portola and Frank Sinatra
· The impact on traffic flow and safety
We had been looking to buy a second home in Palm Desert or the surrounding area for several years to get away
from the long winters in Minnesota. One of the comments we consistently made during our search was that we
appreciated that buildings in the area were mostly 1-2 stories, and that the area really preserved the wonderful
views. In our visit last year we found the Retreat which we thought was perfect. We made an offer on one of the
units which had wonderful views of the mountains. Unfortunately, we were not successful in acquiring this
property. In January of this year, we acquired a unit in the Retreat which has views to the southeast, south,
southwest and west. The views were described as “stunning” by our realtor, which they really are. To say that these
views to the west will potentially be impacted by a three story apartment complex is extremely disappointing is an
understatement. If we owned a unit along Portola, which we almost did and many of our neighbors do, it would be
more disappointing. We understand the need for development, but would ask the Developer and City to reconsider
making this a 3 story complex, as it will obstruct views of many and completely change the feel of the
neighborhood.
Regarding the landscape, we ask that the Developer and City ensure that the landscape and sidewalks is
commensurate with the look around the Retreat and Desert Willow Country Club. This is such a beautiful area,
developments should be held to the same standard. Less concrete and more trees, plants and flowers. Also, moving
the Power Lines along Portola underground would go a long way in making the street look like other main streets in
the area and also a current modern city.
Regarding traffic, I am sure with that many units the impact from the traffic will be significant. Anything to reduce
the impact of the traffic and the resulting noise, whether it is adding more trees or plants, increasing the wall height,
I hope is being considered. Also, given that an additional 1,000 people will be added to the immediate area, I hope
the city is addressing potential safety concerns for the surrounding areas including the Retreat. The fact that a
portion of the residents at the new development could potentially be shorter rentals is of concern, especially since
we are not at our property year around.
Again thanks for holding the meetings and for listening to our feedback and specific concerns.
Page 87 of 100
If you would like to discuss further, please let me know.
Doug Hoekstra
1504 Retreat Circle
763-257-2131
Page 88 of 100
From:CouncilMeeting Comments
To:Melissa Sass
Cc:Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone
Subject:RE: Opposition to Proposed Complex at Frank Sinatra and Portola
Date:Tuesday, August 23, 2022 9:41:13 AM
Good morning Mr. and Mrs. Sass,
Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed
to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of
the public record.
Kind regards,
Niamh M. Ortega
Deputy City Clerk
Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487
nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org
From: Melissa Sass <nguyenm22@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 12:02 AM
To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org>
Subject: Opposition to Proposed Complex at Frank Sinatra and Portola
From: Aaron and Melissa Sass
2204 Retreat Circle
Palm Desert
The Retreat at Desert Willow
Dear Council and Commission members,
We are homeowners at the Retreat at Desert Willow, the quiet, gated community on Portola,
near Frank Sinatra. Our community is a wonderful balance of neighbors and natural space.
Our complex is located right across the street from the proposed high density apartment
complex at Frank Sinatra and Portola. As homeowners who will be directly impacted by the
proposed complex, we would like to state our opposition.
While we understand an apartment complex may be within the PR-22 Zoning of the land, we
are concerned about the increase in traffic and residents without the infrastructure to support
the addition. Typically, PR-22 zoning is nearer to commercial areas and/or public
transportation, which are not features of the identified land. Instead, this location is near PR-5
and PR-8 communities. We also have not seen additional traffic, parking, and noise studies
that support the addition of this proposed high density housing. What would be the impacts to
water, sewage, and streets in the area?
In addition, the proposed three-story buildings do not integrate into the surrounding areas of
one and two story homes, but instead create a disjointed flow to the community. We also have
concerns that the increase in crowds and changing landscape of the area will negatively impact
property values in homes that we have already significantly invested in.
Page 89 of 100
While we are not wholly opposed to new construction the area, our concerns specifically lie
with the high density housing as currently proposed. We appreciate your time and
consideration of our concerns.
Sincerely,
Aaron and Melissa Sass
Page 90 of 100
From:CouncilMeeting Comments
To:Art Sanchez
Cc:Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone
Subject:RE: HD Portola - Frank Sinatra Apartment Project
Date:Tuesday, August 23, 2022 9:42:04 AM
Good morning Mr. Sanchez,
Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed
to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of
the public record.
Kind regards,
Niamh M. Ortega
Deputy City Clerk
Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487
nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org
From: Art Sanchez <artsanchez@live.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 8:15 AM
To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org>
Cc: Art Sanchez <artsanchez@live.com>
Subject: HD Portola - Frank Sinatra Apartment Project
Good Morning,
We are residents at “The Retreat at Desert Willow”
We strongly oppose the high density, 3-story, apartment complex proposed to be
built at Frank Sinatra and Portola for the following reasons:
1. The beautiful mountain views to the west, will be obstructed, due to a 3-story profile
of the structures and mass of the complex. Our development sits at 2 stories.
2. Extremely high-density housing inconsistent with the existing residential
communities in the area.
3. With a negative impact on traffic, noise level will increase impacting the
surrounding quiet communities. The entrance is to the property of 300+ units is
directly across from our residences where it may be better suited along Frank Sinatra.
3. As the complex piers down into neighboring yards, there will be an Invasion of
privacy or the lack of to exciting residences.
Page 91 of 100
4. Devalues the luxury surrounding communities, with obstruction of views, and lack
of serenity. These boxy 3 story buildings are inconsistent in height with the existing
luxury housing surrounding the area. Desert Willow Golf Course and resort-style
communities already exist in that intersection.
5. Noise levels from this 300+ complex may also impact the serenity of the Desert
Willow golf course, the players edge.
6. The set back from the street is not adequate, and the project is too congested.
Appears to be a lack of or no walls for sound mitigation in the project.
7. Such a large apartment complex would create a transient community of perhaps
600 plus people surrounded by an otherwise stable population, and require much
more city resources, and water usage in an environment where we need to reduce
usages.
Please deny this project in its current form as presented, perhaps a lessor number of
units, or perhaps 2 stories, could be proposed for all of the serious concerns
identified.
Respectfully,
Arthur Sanchez
1903 Retreat Circle
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Page 92 of 100
From:CouncilMeeting Comments
To:Monica Bury
Cc:Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone
Subject:RE: 3-story, 395 unit apartment complex by developer Hayes Dietrich at the southwest corner of Portola and
Frank Sinatra
Date:Tuesday, August 23, 2022 9:42:57 AM
Good morning Ms. Bury and Ms. Angster,
Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed
to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of
the public record.
Kind regards,
Niamh M. Ortega
Deputy City Clerk
Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487
nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org
From: Monica Bury <mbury76@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 8:54 AM
To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org>
Subject: 3-story, 395 unit apartment complex by developer Hayes Dietrich at the southwest corner
of Portola and Frank Sinatra
We have enjoyed quiet and tranquil living at the Retreat at Desert Willow for 4 years. We love our
home, our community, the views and the tranquility. We would very much like to continue to live
here and keep the peace and tranquility. However this proposed project would destroy what we
bought into.
Below is an excerpt from a letter to the City Council from our neighbors, Don and Lisa Mess, 804
Retreat Cir.. They have clearly laid out all the problems and concerns for our community. Please give
you thoughtful consideration to all the points listed below. All the residents of The Retreat have
these same concerns.
As residents of Palm Desert, we want to voice our objections to the 3-story, 395 unit apartment
complex that developer Hayes Dietrich is proposing to build across the street from our community.
The proposed project location is the southwest corner of Portola and Frank Sinatra. Our objections
to the project as proposed are based on numerous reasons:
1. Neighborhood Changes: Our neighborhood, The Retreat at Desert Willow, consists of 112 units
on 15 acres. The proposed complex is 395 units on 18 acres. Although the recently changed zoning
for that property allows 22 units per acre, installing a development such as that within an area which
is primarily 12 units per acre, is a drastic shift in our community. It will change the entire dynamic of
Page 93 of 100
the desert community that we love.
2. Detrimental Noise: A high-density housing complex would alter the quiet enjoyment that we
relish in this neighborhood. The introduction of high density housing project would significantly
increase the amount of street traffic and noise that we currently encounter. There are 671 parking
spaces planned for the project. That is a variance from the current required parking spaces for this
type of development which is 2 parking spaces per unit. A complex with 395 apartments and 671
parking spaces makes for a very busy and loud project. There are only 78 visitor parking spaces
allocated for 395 units. That equates to less than 2% of the population of the complex being able to
have visitors at any given time. Where are all the excess visitors going to park? Overflow parking
would spill over to residential properties across Frank Sinatra.
3. Traffic: The main entrance to the development is planned to be located almost directly across
from The Retreat at Desert Willow. Our homeowners that face Portola will be subjected to car
headlights being directed straight toward their homes in addition to the increased street traffic. Can
exiting the project on Portola will only be allowed to turn right. This means that the number of U-
turns made on Portola, next to the Desert Willow Golf Academy will be very high. The increased risk
for motor vehicle collisions will significantly increase.
4. Light Pollution: Lighting standards installed over the vast areas of outdoor parking will impact the
Dark Sky Initiative that we all rely upon in this area. It is important to our local wildlife as well as
local sky/star watchers.
5. Loss of Views: As the project is currently designed, even though the developer has stated that
they have created “view corridors” between the buildings, the obstruction of our beautiful mountain
views will be almost complete obliteration. The proposed 3 story apartment buildings are massive
and a supposed “view corridor” is a sad excuse for mitigating the views that we will lose. We paid a
lot of money for our views when we purchased at The Retreat. Also note that when The Retreat
project was approved and construction began, the project property was zoned R-8. There was no
way for prospective homebuyers at The Retreat to even begin to think that the city would make such
an aggressive change in zoning for this area. For the city to change the zoning from R-8 to R-22 is
shocking. We realize the need for growth and the need to develop the property in question, but to
do so in such a drastic fashion is not conducive to the area. Homeowners along Frank Sinatra will be
subject to complete view loss. A 3 story building will obliterate their south facing views. In addition
to the fact that residents on the 3rd floor would have views directly into homes along Frank Sinatra.
6. Design of Project: The developer is trying to sell this as a high-end, upscale residential complex.
However, as designed all the building will have exterior staircases. Buildings with exterior staircases
are unattractive and in no way say “upscale”. I find it hard to believe that they will be able to charge
$4,000/month for a 3-bedroom unit in a building with no elevator. The design as proposed tends to
make me think that multiple families will start to share units to cover the “upscale” rent. The only
building with elevator service is located in the center of the complex.
7. Property Perimeter: As currently designed, the project has only vertical slat fencing to surround
the property. This will do nothing to mitigate noise and car headlights. The actual distance between
Page 94 of 100
the street and fence line is quite narrow. It has been stated that the developer will install a
meandering sidewalk around the property. However, the drawings that we have been shown that
installing a sidewalk will be quite tight on space.
8. Property Value Loss: The installation of a high density housing project across the street from The
Retreat at Desert Willow and neighboring homes bordering Frank Sinatra will have a detrimental
effect on area home values. The City of Palm Desert should be applying transitional land use
management practices. Permitting the installation of a 395 unit, high density apartment complex
next to low density neighborhoods will have a negative impact on our property values.
In summary, the proposed project may be a “nice apartment complex”, but it is not right for the
proposed location and neighborhood. It needs to be built in an area more conducive to apartment
complexes. We moved to this quiet neighborhood for specific reasons, and sadly, the introduction
of a massive high density housing project directly across the street will be a detriment to our
community.
Monica Bury and Gwendolyn Angster
1102 Retreat Circle
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Page 95 of 100
From:Gary Sheneman
To:Kevin Swartz
Subject:Opposed to Hayes-Dietrich Proposed Apartment Complex
Date:Wednesday, August 24, 2022 6:42:31 AM
Attachments:We sent you safe versions of your files.msg
HD Project - Objection.pdf
Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files.
To: The City of Palm Desert City Council
From: Gary and Mary Sheneman
As opposed to being redundant I have attached a letter sent to you by Don & Lisa Mess concerning their objections
to the proposed apartment complex across from the The Retreat. Their points for objecting to the project are spot on
and Mary and I both agree with what they have outlined 100%.
When we bought our condo at The Retreat we fully realized that at some point the lot across the street at Portola and
Frank Sinatra would be developed at some point. The expectation was that a value added community (high end
homes) would be built befitting the Palm Desert neighborhood that it is in. No one would have imagined a 3 story
395 unit apartment complex which will have a negative impact on views, traffic, noise, property values and etc.
We are all for growth in Palm Desert that adds value to the neighborhood but not growth that detracts as this project
will. I would appreciate the Council refusing the request to build this high-density apartment complex.
Thanks
Gary & Mary Sheneman
203 Retreat Circle
Palm Desert, CA.
Page 96 of 100
From:Cam Cameron
To:Kevin Swartz
Subject:Fwd: Opposition to the proposed project at Portola and Frank Sinatra
Date:Sunday, September 4, 2022 12:20:06 PM
Kevin:
We sent this to City Council over the weekend.
Cam Cameron
Begin forwarded message:
From: Cam Cameron <camrn2@yahoo.com>
Date: September 4, 2022 at 11:26:13 PDT
To: CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org
Subject: Opposition to the proposed project at Portola and Frank Sinatra
To:
Members of the City Council of Palm Desert of Palm Springs
From:
Jeffrey and Cameron Cameron
2601 Retreat Circle
Palm Desert Ca 92260
Council:
This is our second letter to you regarding this project. After attending the
Planning Department Community Meeting, hosted to discuss the proposed
development of the 394 unit high density apartment complex at Portola and
Frank Sinatra, on September 1st at 5:30, we feel it necessary to emphasis a few
more important points:
1. Our complex, The Retreat at Desert Willow, is directly across the street on
Portola. When our project was approved for development, the property in
question was zoned for R-8 . It was changed to R-22 after our construction was
approved and began in 2017. As new buyers, none of us were made aware of this
change. (Our builder may not have known of this density change across the
street.)
2. All original buyers at The Retreat were charged SUBSTANTIAL premium
fees for our views ranging from $40,000 to over $150,000 added to our purchase
price. These were for golf course and mountain and pool views. These added
prices became part of our purchase price. These higher prices added to the
property tax base and translates to higher fees collected by the City of Palm
Desert. Essentially, what we paid extra for, and continue to pay taxes on, will
now be eliminated for many of our homeowners. All of us with west mountain
views stand to have those wiped out by this three story project. Views we paid
for!!!
Page 97 of 100
3. I (Cam) am a retired registered nurse. It is mentioned that all but one of the
buildings will have exterior stairs and no elevators. These are proposed 3 story
buildings. How does this meet current ADA needs? Families with small children,
people with disabilities, and the elderly will have a very difficult, if not
impossible, time negotiating stairs to the upper floors.
4. According to the elevations that we have seen, there will be balconies on the
back side of the buildings facing both Portola and Frank Sinatra Dr. Obviously
those balconies will be open to view by the passing motoring public and more
importantly by the residents of the surrounding properties. No doubt those
balconies and whatever is on them will be unsightly, not to mention a platform
for looking down upon the adjacent neighborhoods.
We strongly urge you to deny this project as proposed and reconsider the zoning
on the small parcel of land. We argue that this particular property is not
appropriate for R-22 designation. In particular, apartment dwelling. Such a large
apartment complex will undoubtedly attract a more transient population by its
very nature situated in an otherwise stable owner-residential community.
Condominiums in our complex have recently sold for over a million dollars with
the mountain views that will be blocked by that construction.
We welcome a scaled down single family home project or at most a two story less
dense project on that property. Ideally, a park would be perfect!
We invite you to visit us any time to see for yourself the impact this proposed
project will have on our community.
Thank you for your consideration,
Cam and Jeff Cameron
Page 98 of 100
To: The City of Palm Desert City Council
From: Don & Lisa Mess - 804 Retreat Circle, Palm Desert, CA 92260
Date: August 19, 2022
RE: Hayes-Dietrich Proposed Apartment Complex Project
As residents of Palm Desert, we want to voice our objections to the 3-story, 395 unit apartment complex
that developer Hayes Dietrich is proposing to build across the street from our community. The
proposed project location is the southwest corner of Portola and Frank Sinatra. Our objections to the
project as proposed are based on numerous reasons:
1. Neighborhood Changes: Our neighborhood, The Retreat at Desert Willow, consists of 112 units
on 15 acres. The proposed complex is 395 units on 18 acres. Although the recently changed
zoning for that property allows 22 units per acre, installing a development such as that within an
area which is primarily 12 units per acre, is a drastic shift in our community. It will change the
entire dynamic of the desert community that we love.
2. Detrimental Noise: A high-density housing complex would alter the quiet enjoyment that we
relish in this neighborhood. The introduction of high density housing project would significantly
increase the amount of street traffic and noise that we currently encounter. There are 671
parking spaces planned for the project. That is a variance from the current required parking
spaces for this type of development which is 2 parking spaces per unit. A complex with 395
apartments and 671 parking spaces makes for a very busy and loud project. There are only 78
visitor parking spaces allocated for 395 units. That equates to less than 2% of the population of
the complex being able to have visitors at any given time. Where are all the excess visitors going
to park? Overflow parking would spill over to residential properties across Frank Sinatra.
3. Traffic: The main entrance to the development is planned to be located almost directly across
from The Retreat at Desert Willow. Our homeowners that face Portola will be subjected to car
headlights being directed straight toward their homes in addition to the increased street traffic.
Can exiting the project on Portola will only be allowed to turn right. This means that the
number of U-turns made on Portola, next to the Desert Willow Golf Academy will be very high.
The increased risk for motor vehicle collisions will significantly increase.
4. Light Pollution: Lighting standards installed over the vast areas of outdoor parking will impact
the Dark Sky Initiative that we all rely upon in this area. It is important to our local wildlife as
well as local sky/star watchers.
5. Loss of Views: As the project is currently designed, even though the developer has stated that
they have created “view corridors” between the buildings, the obstruction of our beautiful
mountain views will be almost complete obliteration. The proposed 3 story apartment buildings
are massive and a supposed “view corridor” is a sad excuse for mitigating the views that we will
lose. We paid a lot of money for our views when we purchased at The Retreat. Also note that
Page 99 of 100
when The Retreat project was approved and construction began, the project property was
zoned R-8. There was no way for prospective homebuyers at The Retreat to even begin to think
that the city would make such an aggressive change in zoning for this area. For the city to
change the zoning from R-8 to R-22 is shocking. We realize the need for growth and the need to
develop the property in question, but to do so in such a drastic fashion is not conducive to the
area. Homeowners along Frank Sinatra will be subject to complete view loss. A 3 story building
will obliterate their south facing views. In addition to the fact that residents on the 3rd floor
would have views directly into homes along Frank Sinatra.
6. Design of Project: The developer is trying to sell this as a high-end, upscale residential complex.
However, as designed all the building will have exterior staircases. Buildings with exterior
staircases are unattractive and in no way say “upscale”. I find it hard to believe that they will be
able to charge $4,000/month for a 3-bedroom unit in a building with no elevator. The design as
proposed tends to make me think that multiple families will start to share units to cover the
“upscale” rent. The only building with elevator service is located in the center of the complex.
7. Property Perimeter: As currently designed, the project has only vertical slat fencing to surround
the property. This will do nothing to mitigate noise and car headlights. The actual distance
between the street and fence line is quite narrow. It has been stated that the developer will
install a meandering sidewalk around the property. However, the drawings that we have been
shown that installing a sidewalk will be quite tight on space.
8. Property Value Loss: The installation of a high density housing project across the street from
The Retreat at Desert Willow and neighboring homes bordering Frank Sinatra will have a
detrimental effect on area home values. The City of Palm Desert should be applying transitional
land use management practices. Permitting the installation of a 395 unit, high density
apartment complex next to low density neighborhoods will have a negative impact on our
property values.
In summary, the proposed project may be a “nice apartment complex”, but it is not right for the
proposed location and neighborhood. It needs to be built in an area more conducive to apartment
complexes. We moved to this quiet neighborhood for specific reasons, and sadly, the introduction
of a massive high density housing project directly across the street will be a detriment to our
community.
Page 100 of 100
CITY OF PALM DESERTATTENDANCE REPORTAdvisory Body: Prepared By:YearMonthDate 11‐Jan 25‐Jan 8‐Feb 22‐Feb 8‐Mar 22‐Mar 12‐Apr 26‐Apr 10‐May 24‐May 14‐Jun 28‐Jun 12‐Jul 26‐Jul 9‐Aug 23‐Aug 13‐Sep 27‐Sep 11‐Oct 25‐Oct 8‐Nov 22‐Nov 13‐Dec 27‐DecLambell, KarelP P P P‐APPPPPP21Latkovic, Nicholas P P P P‐PPPPPPP‐‐‐PPP40McAuliffe, Michael P P P P‐PPPAPPP‐‐‐PAP62McIntosh, James P P P P‐PPAPPPA‐‐‐PPA73Van Vliet, ChrisP P P P‐PAPP PPP21Vuksic, JohnP P P P‐PPPPPPP‐‐‐PPP40Colvard, Dean WallacePPP00Sanchez, FranciscoPP00Palm Desert Municipal Code 2.34.010:P PresentA AbsentE Excused‐No meeting20222022 202220222022Total AbsencesOctNovDecArchitectural Review CommissionM. Gonzalez2022 2022Twice Monthly: Six unexcused absences from regular meetings in any twelve‐month period shall constitute an automatic resignation of members holding office on boards that meet twice monthly.Total Unexcused AbsencesJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep2022 20222022 20222022