Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0 Agenda packet supplemental - 2022-09-29 CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers From: Heather Horning, Assistant to the City Manager Date: September 29, 2022 Subject: City Council Agenda (September 29, 2022) Below you will find questions received from the Mayor and/or Councilmembers and answers provided by City staff regarding tonight’s Council meeting agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR – ITEM 1H: AWARD A CONTRACT TO GREAT WESTERN INSTALLATIONS, INC., OF LOGAN, UTAH FOR THE PARK PLA YGROUND IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $90,000 PER FISCAL YEAR (PROJECT NO. 941- 23) • Question: What factors will determine the order in which parks will be improved? o Answer: The California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (JPIA) recently completed a playground audit of all City playgrounds. In the audit, they provided needed repairs by high, medium, and low priorities. Staff intends to schedule work based on their recommendations, staring with the high priorities. Once these items are complete, staff will develop an on-going maintenance program. ACTION CALENDAR – ITEM 2A: INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL) OF THE PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE ADDING CHAPTER 2.22 ESTABLISHING THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION • Comment: Section 2.22.020 of the proposed Municipal Code regarding membership states “and may include three (3) members the following” and should state “and may include three (3) members from the following”. Staff will address this correction in their presentation and will make this correction in the language prior to the ordinance coming back for the second reading. • Question: Is it the intent that appointment of a non-resident could be made to satisfy the need for a minimum of 3 architects in Section 2.22.020 of proposed Municipal Code? o Answer: Yes, the intent of the non-resident Commissioner is to fill in as one of the (3) architects or (1) landscape architect professional we will strive to maintain. Supplemental Q & A Memo-1 Question & Answer Memo Page 2 of 3 • Question: Can you provide a copy of the staff report from November 19, 2020, containing the overview of the subcommittee’s findings on committees and commissions, including their 22 recommendations and areas identified for further review? o Answer: A copy of the staff report is attached as Attachment 1 for reference. ACTION CALENDAR – ITEM 2B: CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NOS. 1374 § 1 AND 1258 § 1, REVISING CHAPTER 24.04.060 (INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES) OF THE PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PROHIBITED LANDSCAPE MATERIALS FOR DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND INSTALLATION • Question: Is it the intent to completely prohibit something like North Indian Rosewood everywhere even though the problem seems to be about planting in specific locations where it can cause buckling? o Answer: Yes, the North Indian Rosewood would be banned everywhere, not just adjacent to pavement. The ban would also apply to private development. The City will provide consultants and developers information on suitable alternative trees. The intent of this ordinance amendment is to protect infrastructure and minimize maintenance costs throughout the City, including private developments. Prohibiting the North Indian Rosewood for new development will ensure the City is doing its part to protect both public and private infrastructure ACTION CALENDAR – ITEM 2D: AWARD CONTRACT TO HERMANN DESIGN GROUP OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, FOR DESIGN SERVICES OF GREENS/TEE BOX RENOVATION AND TURF REDUCTION AT DESERT WILLOW GOLF RESORT IN THE AMOUNT OF $305,100 (PROJECT NO. 854-21) • Question: Can you confirm that DSRT Surf is planning to remove 1 million square feet of turf? o Answer: Yes, DSRT Surf is funding removal of approximately 1 million square feet of turf, resulting in a decrease of 106 acre-feet of water per year at Desert Willow. • Question: What is the City’s backup plan for turf removal if DSRT Surf is unable to fund or finish construction? o Answer: In order to minimize disruptions to the operations at Desert Willow, staff added the DSRT Surf turf reduction project to an existing greens/tee box renovation project. If DSRT Surf is ready to move forward with their project at the time the City is ready to construct the greens/tee box renovation, the turf reduction improvements will be included. If DSRT Surf is not ready to move forward with their project, the turf reduction improvements would be delayed until the project moves forward and funding is made available or the City allocates funding for the improvements. Supplemental Q & A Memo-2 Question & Answer Memo Page 3 of 3 • Question: Can the City remove the turf and replace it with drought tolerant and native plants without DSRT Surf? If so, how much is currently or could be allocated to achieve this? How much turf could the City remove without DSRT Surf? o Answer: Yes, the City can utilize the turf reduction design developed under this contract to remove turf on its own. In working with DSRT Surf, the City has negotiated that DSRT Surf fund the turf removal to off-set the water demand of their project. The developer estimates turf reduction improvements will cost approximately $2,500,000. If no developer funding is available, the City would need to appropriate monies to fund the turf removal. • Question: Where will trees be relocated? Can they be used in our parks or other green space? o Answer: Hermann Design Group would determine trees required to be removed during the design process. The City can coordinate a relocation plan with the designer, if it is economically and logistically feasible to do so. • Question: The staff report mentions that Bermuda grass is encroaching on the greens. What is being done to limit this? o Answer: The designer has been informed of existing issues that need to be addressed during design, including the encroachment of Bermuda Grass onto the greens, and will make sure these are considered in the design process. PUBLIC HEARING – ITEM 3A: APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 21-0002 (GPA 21-0002) FOR READOPTION OF THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT (2021-2029) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD) GUIDELINES • Question: the slide on page 3A-141 says the median housing value is $335,400. Where did this value come from? Page 3A-267 lists the Median single-family purchase price as $485,000 in 2021. Can you provide clarification on these numbers? o Answer: The Housing Element was written in early 2021. The source of the information for the slide on page 3A-141 was the American Community Survey 2014-2018 (this is an extension of the Census that is updated annually). The information is also provided in the Housing Element, page 3A-51 and 52, which also describes the time period when the information was collected. The Table on page 3A-267 (also provided on page 3A-111 of the current updated Element) was based on Board of Realtors’ estimates at the time, and includes all for-sale product (including single family homes, condos and townhouses, mobile homes, etc.). Because the data was collected at the end of 2020 and beginning of 2021, it is lower than current conditions. Attachments: 1. Staff Report – City Committees and Commissions Supplemental Q & A Memo-3 STAFF REPORT CITY OF PALM DESERT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE MEETING DATE: November 19, 2020 PREPARED BY: Christopher Gerry, Management Analyst REQUEST: Approve in concept the recommendations to the City's commissions and committees. Recommendation By minute motion, approve in concept the 22 recommendations to the City's commissions and committees as identified below. Appointment Term: 1. Revise the commissioner and committee member appointment terms based upon the fiscal year and extend the existing terms accordingly. I Volume: 2. Eliminate the Library Promotion Committee and integrate any associated discussion items into the Parks and Recreation Commission in the future. 3. Eliminate the Hotel and Signature Events Committee and integrate any associated discussion items into the Marketing Committee in the future. 4. Eliminate the Youth Committee and complement the Family YMCA of the Desert's Youth and Government Program in the future. Membershia: 5. Adopt a City Council appointment policy that limits applicants with real or perceived conflict of interests from consideration on commissions and committees. 6. Reduce the membership of the Citizens' Sustainability Committee from thirteen (13) to nine (9) members. Name: 7. Revise the name of the Citizens' Sustainability Committee to the Resource Preservation and Enhancement Committee. Freauencv: 8. Revise the Citizens' Sustainability Committee's schedule to monthly meetings. Supplemental Q & A Memo-4 November 19, 2020 - Staff Report Commissions and Committees Page 2 of 10 9. Revise the Finance Committee's schedule to monthly meetings. Scope: 10. Revise the scope of the Citizens' Sustainability Committee to include active transportation-related items. Application Process: 11. Create an online application for residents interested in applying for a commission or committee position. 12. Revise the content of the application and include the City's diversity statement. 13. Create an electronic performance / skill survey that serves as a reference check. Interview Process: 14. Adopt a policy that commissioners and committee members shall interview with the City Council for reappointment every four-year term. 15. Create a limited review process (short form) for continuing reappointments. Onboardina Process: 16. Provide newly appointed commissioners and committee members an orientation to understand the policies and procedures of commissions or committees. 17. Adopt a policy that all newly appointed or reappointed commissioners and committee members must complete ethics training as part of the onboarding process. Aaenda and Minutes: 18. Make the agenda format reasonably consistent across commissions and committees. 19. Include commissioner and committee member fiscal year attendance on each agenda. 20. Adopt the use of action minutes for all commissions and committees. Website: 21. Revise the City's website content for commissions and committees. Policies and Procedures: 22. Create a policies and procedures manual for commissions and committees. Supplemental Q & A Memo-5 November 19, 2020 - Staff Report Commissions and Committees Page 3 of 10 Backaround For numerous years, the City Council has presented various questions and comments regarding its commissions and committees. As a result, the City Council requested a study session to begin conducting a comprehensive review of its commissions and committees. On January 23, 2020, the City Council held a study session and appointed a Subcommittee to conduct an in-depth evaluation and develop recommendations. The Subcommittee has subsequently met on several occasions. To begin, the Subcommittee developed the following goals that include, but are not limited to: Continually engaging commissioners and committee members by ensuring consistent meetings with meaningful discussion items; Viewing commissioners and committee members as City ambassadors since they frequently share meeting information with other community members; Identifying opportunities to increase the effectiveness of commissions and committees,- but finding efficiencies to manage the workload of City staff, especially during times of economic uncertainty; and Utilizing technology and revising public-facing documents and webpages associated with commissions and committees. Please note that many of these recommendations require further City Council action, including revisions to various ordinances, bylaws and other activities. Notwithstanding, the Subcommittee desires to receive City Council's consideration of the recommendations in concept before taking additional steps to prepare and present such items for further review. Recommendations requiring further action will be continuously presented for consideration over various meetings in the immediate future. Appointment Term: 1. Revise the commissioner and committee member appointment terms based upon the fiscal vear and extend the existina terms accordinalv. The City Council conducts commission and committee interviews in late December or early January of any given year. Appointments are based upon the calendar year. The interviews tend to be difficult to schedule because they conflict with the holiday season for all stakeholders, including the City Council, City staff and applicants. Appointments tend to occur in February or March, and are retroactive to January of that respective year. The Subcommittee recommends having the appointment terms based upon the fiscal year. If approved, the interviews would occur in March or April with appointments occurring in May or June annually. Approval would also extend the existing terms of commissioners and committee members until June 30, 2020. Supplemental Q & A Memo-6 November 19, 2020 - Staff Report Commissions,and Committees Page 4 of 10 . Volume: 2. Eliminate the Library Promotion Committee and intearate anv associated items into the Parks and Recreation Commission in the future. The Library Fromotion Committee rec the usefulness of the public library fc Committee has cancelled over 80% c recommends eliminating the Library associated discussion items under Commission in the future. - mmends programs and policies that enhance r our residents. Over the last five years, the f its scheduled meetings. The Subcommittee Promotion Committee and integrating any the purview of the Parks and Recreation 3. Eliminate the Hotel and Siqnature Events Committee and intearate anv associated discussion items into the Marketina Committee in the future. The Hotel and Signature Events Committee advises the City Council on tourism, hospitality trends and/or programs related to the economic development, and the stability of tourism and hospitality in Palm Desert. The Committee has some overlap in terms of scope and rriembership with the Marketing Committee. Over 60% of the bi- monthly meetings were cancelled over the last three years as well. The Subcommittee recommends eliminating the Hotel and Signature Events Committee and integrating any associated discussion items under the purview of the Marketing Committee. 4. Eliminate the Youth Committee and complement the Familv YMCA of the Desert's Youth and Government Proaram in the future. The Youth Committee advises the City Council on programs and activities aimed to serve young people in the community. While the City has a strong commitment to serving youth, the Committee's engagement and popularity have diminished over time. There are currently only nine (9) of fifteen (15) committee members appointed, even though the City continually conducts outreach to youth through our local schools. It is our understanding that other youth committee programs seem to have similar membership and engagement challenges as well. Concurrently, the Family YMCA of the Desert (YMCA) manages a successful Youth and Government Program. This program offers a hands-on experience for students to learn abou# how they can advocate for change at the federal, state and local levels. Annually, approximately 45 to 55 youth participate in this program with 50% residing and/or attending school in Palm Desert. The Subcommittee recommends eliminating the Youth Committee and partnering with the.YMCA to enhance its Youth and Government Program. The YCMA welcomes and looks forward to this potential partnership as well. Membershia: 5. Adopt a Citv Council appointment policv that limits applicants with real or pereeived conflict of interests from consideration on commissions and committees. According to the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC); a public official has a disqualifying conflict of interest in a governmental decision if it is Supplemental Q & A Memo-7 November 19, 2020 - Staff Report Commissions and Committees Page 5 of 10 foreseeable that the decision will have a financial impact on his or her personal finances or other financial interests. In such cases, there is a risk of biased decision-making that could sacrifice the public's interest in favor of the official's private financial interests. To avoid actual bias or the appearance of possible improprieties, the public official is prohibited from participating in the decision. To uphold the highest ethical standards while mitigating the appearance possible improprieties, the Subcommittee recommends adopting a City Council appointment policy that limits applicants with real or perceived conflict of interests from consideration on commissions and committees. While the FPPC is responsible for providing guidance on conflicts of interest, this recommendation reinforces the City's commitment to fostering the public's trust and confidence in government. 6. Reduce the membership of the Citizens' Sustainabilitv Committee from thirteen (13) to nine (9) members. As a benchmark, City staff evaluated all 25 California jurisdictions with populations between 50,000 and 60,000 residents, which incorporates a total of 139 commissions and committees. Of these commissions and committees, only 9% have more than nine members. The Subcommittee recommends reducing the committee membership from thirteen (13) to nine (9) members. The committee currently has nine (9) members. Name: 7. Revise the name of the Citizens' Sustainabilitv Committee to the Resource Preservation and Enhancement Committee. The Citizens' Sustainability Committee is responsible for advising City Council on the programs and targets in achieving identified actions in the Palm Desert Environmental Sustainability Plan and Greenhouse Gas Inventory (Sustainability Plan). However, the committee does not currently refer to the Sustainability Plan since the City has previously achieved numerous plan goals. In addition, "sustainability" generally refers to maintaining something at a certain rate or level. The committee's name and scope appears undistinguished and unreflective of its activities. The Subcommittee recommends revising the name to the Resource Preservation and Enhancement' Committee. The revised name addresses the importance of not only preserving our resources, but making them better as well. Freauencv: 8. Revise the Citizens' Sustainabilitv Committee's schedule to monthlv meetinas. As previously described, a Subcommittee goal includes continually engaging commissioners and committee members by ensuring consistent meetings with meaningful discussion items. Approximately 70% (96 of 138) of the evaluated commissions and committees hold monthly meetings as well. The Subcommittee recommends revising the Citizens' Sustainability Committee meetings from bi-monthly to monthly. - Supplemental Q & A Memo-8 November 19, 2020 - Staff Report Commissions and Committees Page 6 of 10 9. Revise the Finance Committee's schedule to monthlv meetinas. For the same reasons stated above, the Subcommittee recommends revising the Finance Committee meetings from bi-monthly to monthly. Scope: 10. Revise the scope of the Citizens' Sustainabilitv Committee to include active transportation-related items. , As previously mentioned, the responsibility of the Citizens' Sustainability Committee is mostly advising City Council on efforts related to the Sustainability Plan. Based upon comments during the initial study session and reviewing best practices, there is a trend toward incorporating citizenry review of active transportation programs and activities into commissions and committees. Furthermore, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) administers the Active Transportation Program (ATP), which makes funding available statewide for bicycle and pedestrian improvements. For example, last cycle there was $440 million in ATP funds available statewide. Project applications r.equire a substantial amount of community outreach and support to be competitive as well. Active transportation activities also promotes greenhouse gas reduction and provides other environmental benefits; therefore, this committee appears as the most appropriate placement for discussion items. The Subcommittee recommends revising the scope of the committee to include active transportation- related items. City staff presented this concept to the committee, and they were supportive of changing the scope as well. Apqlication Process: 11. Create an online application for residents interested in applvinq for a commission or committee position. ' The current application to apply for commissions and committees is in paper form. The application is not form-fillable as well. Consequently, the application requires residents to handwrite information; City staff to scan and catalog such applications; and ultimately City Council to review applications, even though it may be difficult to read due to the handwriting and copying such documents. The Subcommittee recommends creating an online application for residents interested in applying for commission or committee positions. 12. Revise the content of the aaplication and include the Citv's diversitv statement. While developing a draft electronic application for City Council consideration, the Subcommittee has utilized this opportunity to review the content of the existing application. The Subcommittee discussed the application at length, including best practices and prior experiences as well. The intent of most questions have remained the same, but presented in a more clear and concise format; the largest revision includes eliminating the optional applicant questionnaire. Supplemental Q & A Memo-9 November 19, 2020 - Staff Report Commissions and Committees Page 7 of 10 13. Create an electronic performance / skill survev that serves as`a reference check. As part of the existing application, applicants are required to provide two references who are not associated with the City of Palm Desert. References many times lack validity since the individuals providing references tend to be overly biased toward respective applicants. Rather than a general reference check, the Subcommittee reCommends creating an electronic pertormance / skill survey. The survey serves as a reference check by asking questions pertinent to the knowledge, skills and abilities of applicants to serve on commissions and committees. Interview Process: 14. Adopt a policv that commissioners and committee members shall interview with the Citv Council for reappointment every four-vear term. ' The City Council appoints commissioners and committee members to four-year terms. As longstanding and exemplary residents in our community, many commissioners and committee members have received continual reappointments. There has been some discussion regarding if interviews should be required for those seeking reappointment. The Subcommittee recommends that each commissioner and committee member seeking reappointment shall interview with the City Council every four years. 15. Create a limited review process (short forml for continuina reaaqointments. While the Subcommittee recommends interviewing potential reappointments, there was mutual consideration for streamlining the process as well. The Subcommittee recommends creating a limited review process (short form) for reappointments. A limited review process creates efficiencies for City Council, City staff and residents. Onboardinq Process: 16. Provide newlv 'aqpointed commissioners and committee members an orientation to understand the policies and procedures of commissions and committees. Upon City Council appointment, commissioners and committee members receive limited information about municipal operations. In fact, they only receive correspondence identifying appointment terms, request submission of a Statement of Economic Interest (Form 700), and the next respective meeting information. Notwithstanding, each department may informally provide information and orient newly appointed commissioners and committee members: The Subcommittee recommends identifying an onboarding process (orientation) for newly appointed commissioners and committee members. While an orientation will help commissioners and committee members understand municipal operations, it will also assist the City Clerk's Office in obtaining all the necessary conflict of interest forms and other documents; thus, creating administrative efficiencies as well. Supplemental Q & A Memo-10 November 19, 2020 - Staff Report Commissions and Committees Page 8 of 10 17. Adopt a policv that all newlv aqaointed or reappointed commissioners and committee members must complete ethics trainina as part of the onboardina process. California State Government Code Section 53235 requires that specified local agency officials receive at least two hours training in ethics every two years. While the City's commissioners and committee members are encouraged to attend ethics training, they are not required since they do not receive compensation or reimbursement for expenses to perform such duties. To promote the highest ethical standards, the Subcommittee recommends that all newly appointed or reappointed commissioners and committee members complete ethics training as part of the onboarding process. Aaenda and Minutes: 18. Make the aaenda format reasonablv consistent across commissions and committees. While recognizing commissions and committees have unique purposes and review different subject matters, each agenda format was reviewed for a certain degree of consistency. As a result, the agenda formats were found to be inconsistent. The Subcommittee recommends making the agenda format reasonably consistent across commissions and committees. 19. Include commissioner and committee member fiscal vear attendance on each aaenda. The Palm Desert Municipal Code 2.34.010 identifies an attendance policy for commissioners and committee members. The attendance policy outlines the amount of acceptable unexcused absences before constituting an automatic resignation of a commissioner or committee member. While departments track attendance informally, there is not a transparent platform identifying such information. The Subcommittee recommends including commissioner and committee member fiscal year attendance on each respective agenda. 20. Adopt the use of action minutes for all commissions and committees. On August 27, 2020, the City Council adopted the use of action minutes for City Council meetings. As mentioned in the previous staff report, the Subcommittee would consider the production of action minutes for commissions and committees. For the same reasons previously identified, the Subcommittee recommends adopting the use of action minutes. Website: 21. Revise the website content for commissions and committees. As p.reviously mentioned, a Subcommittee goal includes revising public-facing documents and website content associated with commissions and committees. The Subcommittee recommends revising the website content, including by clearly outlining responsibilities, member names, staff contact information, meeting days and times, agendas and minutes. Supplemental Q & A Memo-11 November 19, 2020 - Staff Report Commissions and Committees Page 9 of 10 Policies and Procedures: 22. Adopt a policies and procedures manual for commissions and committees. This comprehensive review of commissions and committees has given the Subcommittee and City staff an opportunity to conduct an in-depth evaluation of this subject matter. In order to capture the knowledge and wisdom gained throughout this review process, the Subcommittee recommends adopting a policies and procedures manual that incorporates newly approved recommendations and current practices. Additional Input and Reauests Due to the City Council's ongoing attention and discussions regarding commissions and committees, the Subcommittee recognizes that each Councilmember may have additional items desired for further review. Therefore, the Subcommittee invites additional City Council input and research requests for additional consideration. City staff will research any additional items-and present such information to the Subcommittee for review and recommendation. Any recommendations will then be presented for C,ity Council's consideration in the future. Next Steps The Subcommittee recognizes this comprehensive review as an ongoing and collaborative process between the City Council, City staff and community stakeholders. The chorological and/or concurrent steps to continue this review process includes: Complete activities associated with any approved recommendations this evening. Conduct additional research requests identified by City Council that may not have been previously identified by the Subcommittee. Present to the City Council any completed activities (deliverables) associated with the approved recommendations and Subcommittee recommendations resulting from any additional research requests. Conduct a thorough review of each commission and committee's bylaws and develop additional recommendations accordingly. The Subcommittee also recognizes this is an iterative process and, as a result, may develop further recommendations following the implementation of any revisions and identifying new and worthwhile policy considerations. Finally, City staff would like to thank the Subcommittee for its time and effort on conducting this comprehensive review. Research Information The Subcommittee requested and reviewed various types of information to develop these recommendations. City staff developed a web-based application to provide the requested information in a digestible format. The information is printable and reviewable from desktops and mobile devices. The information can be found at https://arca.is/Hv5fL. Supplemental Q & A Memo-12 November 19, 2020 - Staff Report Commissions and Committees Page 10 of 10 Fiscal Analvsis There is no fiscal impact associated with this request. LEGAL REVIEW 2}f Robert W. Hargreaves City Attorney DEPT. REVIEW N/A Randy Bynder Interim City Manager FINANCIAL REVIEW cm.P."??. '!'j?on2 Janet Moore Director of Finance Interim City Manager Randy Bynder: A tc ti CI'i'Y COUNCILACTION API'ROVED DENTED 12CC IVED OTHER Tr c . T .. / /—/ -.D _ . ev s• - No s: P A 3SCNT: /(1YlQ A}3STAiN: lfm dClaI+IED I3Y• . Original on File with City 1 k's Ofiice By Minute Motion, moved to approve the concept and recommendations as listed in the staff report with further exploration and consideration of items2, 3, 4, 5,14, and 15, including looking into expanding the Art In Public Places Committee role to include children's art, sidewalk art, etc. Also, ensure current Committee and Commission members are notified that their term will be extended to June 30, 2021. 5-0 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ndy ,'irestine Andy Firestine Assistant City Manager Supplemental Q & A Memo-13 LUPINE PLAZA PLANNING & DESIGN SERVICES CONTRACT September 29, 2022 Supplemental Item 2C-1 AGENDA •History •Consultant Procurement •Consultant Recommendation •Timeline •Direction Requested for Alternative Analysis •Fee Proposal Options 2 Supplemental Item 2C-2 During the COVID-19 shutdown, the City installed a temporary plaza on Lupine Lane north of El Paseo The temporary plaza remained in place through December 2021 The plaza included tables, chair, & umbrellas & was used for outdoor dining & small events After issuing an RFP, the City contracted with MIG, Inc. to create a design for a new permanent plaza Stakeholder subcommittee and community input to vet options On April 14, 2022, the City Council approved a conceptual design for a permanent Lupine Plaza On June 23, 2022, the City Council approved releasing an RFP for planning & design services HISTORY 3 Supplemental Item 2C-3 CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT Study up to 3 Alternatives CEQA Analysis Traffic Study Preliminary Engineering Community Engagement PHASE I 4 Final Engineering Construction Support Bidding Support Community Engagement PHASE II Release RFP:August 05, 2022 Pre-Proposal Meeting: August 18, 2022 Submission Deadline:August 29, 2022 Proposer Interviews:September 02, 2022 Negotiations:September 6 & 8, 2022 Supplemental Item 2C-4 •Location:Perris, CA •Cost:$601,291 Interwest Consulting Group, Inc. 5 CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT •Location: San Diego, CA •Cost: $687,497 MIG, Inc. Supplemental Item 2C-5 RECOMMENDED CONSULTANT Interwest Consulting Group 6 Most responsive to identified needs Professional, attentive & serviceable In-depth & knowledgeable team (in-house) Experience working with similar communities Enthusiasm & experience with community outreach Third-party review Best value / lowest cost Supplemental Item 2C-6 TIMELINE 14-Month Design Schedule Phase I •Completion QTR 1 2023 Phase II •Completion QTR 4 2023 7 Supplemental Item 2C-7 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS Full Closure (Preferred)“Slow Street” (Alt . 1)One-way Access (Alt . 2) 8 Supplemental Item 2C-8 FEE PROPOSAL OPTIONS 9 Scope of Work Design Contract (Unit Cost)Total Design Contract Balance for Construction Approved Design Concept (Full Closure)$ 562,135 $ 562,135 $ 3,437,865 One Alternative Design Concept Analysis (“Slow Street”)$ 16,880 $ 579,015 $ 3,420,985 Two Alternative Design Concept Analysis (One-way Access)$ 33,760 $ 595,895 $ 3,404,105 Supplemental Item 2C-9 RECOMMENDED ACTION & REQUEST FOR DIRECTION •Staff recommends and requests the following: •Award the contract to Interwest with a base contract amount of $562,135 •Provide direction on the number of alternatives to study ($16,880 per alternative) •State in the motion the total contract amount corresponding to the number of alternatives to be studied: 1.No alternatives: $562,135 2.One alternative:$579,015 3.Two alternatives:$595,895 10 Supplemental Item 2C-10 1 Niamh M. Ortega From:Anthony Mejia Sent:Monday, September 26, 2022 11:00 AM To:Niamh M. Ortega Subject:FW: Lupine Plaza Agenda correspondence      Anthony Mejia City Clerk Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6304 amejia@cityofpalmdesert.org   From: Gayle Moore <rosebowl1424@aol.com>   Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2022 8:12 AM  To: Information Mail <info@cityofpalmdesert.org>  Subject: Lupine Plaza    I'm writing this email to the City of Palm Desert to express my support of the Lupine Plaza project. The area is at a midpoint on El Paseo, and is a perfect location to designate as a meeting place for family and friends. It will offer seating and shade, a place to enjoy a snack, and would be a respite for weary shoppers. The area is highly visible, and can be easily policed and maintained. I see nothing but positive outcomes from this project! Gayle Moore 24 Calle Lantana Palm Desert, CA 92260 760-773-2740 Supplemental Item 2C-11 1 Niamh M. Ortega From:Information Mail Sent:Wednesday, September 28, 2022 8:41 AM To:Niamh M. Ortega Cc:Eric Ceja; Randy Bowman; Erika Castellano Subject:FW: Lupine Plaza Good morning,     We have received the following comment via Info Mail regarding Lupine Plaza.     Barbara Blythe  Management Analyst  Ph: 760.568.1441  Direct: 760.837.1662  bblythe@cityofpalmdesert.org    ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐  From: Paul Murphy <deswel3539@icloud.com>   Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 7:43 AM  To: Information Mail <info@cityofpalmdesert.org>  Subject: Lupine Plaza    I’d like to take this opportunity to comment on the proposed Lupine Plaza which is under consideration by the City  Council.  In my opinion the Plaza will be a well received new attraction for the El Paseo shopping district.  Not only will it  be beneficial to the stores on El Paseo, but it will be a shot in the arm for some of the local restaurants.      The design as presented is aesthetically very attractive and should appeal to many shoppers and tourists as well as local  residents.    I strongly encourage the City Council to move forward with this innovative new project.    Paul Murphy  73064 Skyward Way  Palm Desert    Supplemental Item 2C-12 1 Niamh M. Ortega From:Eric Ceja Sent:Wednesday, September 28, 2022 5:16 PM To:Niamh M. Ortega Subject:FW: Agenda 2002-09-29 2C__Design_Contract_-_Lupine_Plaza_-_Interwest (002).pdf Attachments:We sent you safe versions of your files; Agenda 2002-09-29 2C__Design_Contract_-_Lupine_Plaza_-_Interwest (002).pdf       Eric Ceja Director of Economic Development Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6384 eceja@cityofpalmdesert.org   From: Sharon Carmichael <scarmichael@lee‐associates.com>   Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:55 PM  To: Eric Ceja <eceja@cityofpalmdesert.org>  Subject: Agenda 2002‐09‐29 2C__Design_Contract_‐_Lupine_Plaza_‐_Interwest (002).pdf    Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. Eric, hope you are well. Wanted to reach out to tell you that I personally experienced two incidents with homeless men coming out of that temporary eating and sitting encampment you guys put up on Lupine last time around. My husband and I are both very much against this project , not that we don’t need improvements to El Paseo – we do , but closing off that street and putting $4,000,000 of our Cities tax money into that is not a good idea in our opinions. As you may remember from meeting me I work in Retail Leasing for 39 years and I was out at a couple different buildings right off that seating area trying to show spaces to “retailers” on two separate times that I am trying to bring here from outside the area that we need to bring into Palm Desert- at both showings I had homeless people that were sleeping in that area come over and enter or lay in front of the spaces I was showing and tap me on the shoulder in one instance, I almost jumped out of my skin and was screaming. How embarrassing this is in front of business professionals we are trying to attract to lease spaces around El Paseo. The second time I was showing space I made sure to shut the door behind me while inside the space at around 5 pm. When myself and the prospective tenant tried to push the door back open to exit we hit a “live homeless person that was laying outside the door of the retail space on the cement with his back pack” who finally moved and when we asked him where he came from he told us he stayed in that Lupine park area during the day and came over to one of the corners to sleep at night. We all know that the homeless problem is a big one and not easy to solve, but putting this area in when all of us residents like to go to the eateries and drinkeries and hang out on their patios – I do not see the need for this investment and that road gets a lot of use of people going to Mastros and all the eateries in those 2 blocks going west or grabbing a pizza at Blaze Pizza-it’s a popular access street Eric. I wanted to make sure I got some comments over to you as I am local living at Ironwood County Club and very active in retail leasing. No eatery I have worked with in this area has had any interest that I know of in this area but all would like more seating area out on El Paseo which is where I think we need to spend that money to make an impact. Thank you, Supplemental Item 2C-13 2 Sharon and Bruce Carmichael – local residents nearby to El Paseo Supplemental Item 2C-14 1 Niamh M. Ortega From:Salima Nurani <snurani08@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 28, 2022 7:34 PM To:CouncilMeeting Comments Subject:Lupine Plaza As a fellow local restaurateur, I’d like to express my personal objection to the proposed Lupine Plaza plans. I understand  that there are few options available to bring this outdoor dining/recreation area to fruition but, any plan that would  create a disadvantage to local businesses would seem to be unreasonable and unsupportive. Palm Desert has always  promoted a vibrant and progressive business community, however the Plaza plans seem to have ignored the damaging  effect it would have on both retail and restaurant establishments located in the adjacent plaza.     I would however, be in favor of an option that would still allow customers to enter the plaza to support the businesses in  the El Paseo One Plaza. But blocking access to these businesses seems unnecessary and unfair.    Thank you for your consideration of my concerns.     Best,  Salima Nurani  949‐232‐2101      Sent from my iPhone    Supplemental Item 2C-15 From:Klein, Patrick To:CouncilMeeting Comments Subject:Lupine Plaza Date:Thursday, September 29, 2022 8:07:59 AM The Gardens on El Paseo appreciates the intentions the City has for this project in creating an attractive public plaza on El Paseo, however we also recognize and share the same concerns of other stakeholders on how this project will affect vehicular accessibility to nearby businesses as well as the potential for an increase in crime and transient activity in the area. In the spirit of compromise, we would advocate for design concept 1 that provides for a slow street flexible plaza but still allows for 2-way vehicular access. Thank you for your consideration. Patrick Klein General Manager Taubman The Gardens on El Paseo / El Paseo Village 73-545 El Paseo Ste. 2500 Palm Desert, CA 92260 P: 760-862-1990 E: pklein@taubman.com This email and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee, and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. References herein to "Taubman" mean The Taubman Company LLC, Taubman Realty Group LLC., or one or more of their separate affiliates. The information contained in this email does not constitute a commitment or agreement by Taubman. No such commitment or agreement shall be binding on Taubman, unless such terms are expressly set forth in a separate document executed by an authorized representative of Taubman. Supplemental Item 2C-16 From:City of Palm Desert To:Deborah Glickman Subject:New idea added on Share Your Ideas For Lupine Plaza Date:Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:34:39 PM Hi dglickman You have received a new contribution on the Ideas tool, Share Your Ideas For Lupine Plaza on project Lupine Plaza Reimagined on your site, I believe it is a bad idea to put that plaza with seating there and closing off that road-all we had was homeless last time-not good idea! - Best idea is to improve the road and add more plantings down both sides. People like to eat & drink at the restaurant patios-which grew during covid and are great-this was needed!! It is a waste of money to build this for homeless to sleep there and commit crimes at adjacent businesses. My husband and I are completely against this project. Better to spend money on El Paseo to make bigger restaurant patios for everyone to hang out please and remove the dumb speedbumps. - Added by PD resident Click here to view the idea This is an auto-generated email sent when a contribution is added to your site on EngagementHQ. If you do not wish to receive this email in the future, you can configure your tool to not send emails. Supplemental Item 2C-17 From:City of Palm Desert To:Deborah Glickman Subject:New comment on Let"s spend that money fixing the messes on Parkview, San Pablo, and El Paseo. All three projects are unkept, unsightly, and unsafe Date:Wednesday, September 28, 2022 2:40:19 PM Hi The following Idea received new comment Let's spend that money fixing the messes on Parkview, San Pablo, and El Paseo. All three projects are unkept, unsightly, and unsafe on your site, - Agreed! - Added by LegalMamma Click here to view the comment Supplemental Item 2C-18 From:City of Palm Desert To:Deborah Glickman Subject:New idea added on Share Your Ideas For Lupine Plaza Date:Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:41:04 AM Hi dglickman You have received a new contribution on the Ideas tool, Share Your Ideas For Lupine Plaza on project Lupine Plaza Reimagined on your site, Stop the Lupine project. - It is terrible for the businesses adjacent and their customers. The temporary closure was a disaster. Also our business is adjacent and nobody from the city ever asked our opinion. We are the ones effected by it. - Added by Josi Click here to view the idea This is an auto-generated email sent when a contribution is added to your site on EngagementHQ. If you do not wish to receive this email in the future, you can configure your tool to not send emails. Supplemental Item 2C-19 From:City of Palm Desert To:Deborah Glickman Subject:New idea added on Share Your Ideas For Lupine Plaza Date:Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:43:38 AM Hi dglickman You have received a new contribution on the Ideas tool, Share Your Ideas For Lupine Plaza on project Lupine Plaza Reimagined on your site, STOP THIS PROJECT. IT IS TERRIBLE FOR THE BUSINESSES AND THEIR CUSTOMERS - - Added by Josi Click here to view the idea This is an auto-generated email sent when a contribution is added to your site on EngagementHQ. If you do not wish to receive this email in the future, you can configure your tool to not send emails. Supplemental Item 2C-20 From:Ryland Penta To:Deborah Glickman Subject:Fw: A new question has been added to Do You Have Any General Questions or Comments For The City? Date:Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:56:57 PM Below is the comment about Lupine Plaza sent via Engage PD's Ask the City page. Best, Ryland Ryland Penta Digital Strategies Coordinator Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6318 rpenta@cityofpalmdesert.org From: City of Palm Desert <notifications@engagementhq.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:35 To: Ryland Penta <rpenta@cityofpalmdesert.org> Subject: A new question has been added to Do You Have Any General Questions or Comments For The City? Hi there, Just a quick heads up to let you know that a new question has been asked at Ask City Hall by Josi. The question that was asked is: Please cancel Lupine project. It is terrible for the businesses and their customers. We are 73750 El Paseo and nobody from the city asked ever our opinion Please DO NOT reply to this email. If you want to provide an answer to this question, sign into your site and respond to the question from within the Q & A tool. Regards Bang The Table Team Supplemental Item 2C-21 From:Information Mail To:Niamh M. Ortega Cc:Randy Bowman; Eric Ceja; Erika Castellano Subject:FW: I support Lupine Plaza Date:Thursday, September 29, 2022 10:59:33 AM Hello, We have received the following comment via Info Mail related to Lupine Plaza. Barbara Blythe Communications Analyst II Ph: 760.568.1441 Direct: 760.837.1662 bblythe@cityofpalmdesert.org From: Gayle Moore <rosebowl1424@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 10:21 AM To: Information Mail <info@cityofpalmdesert.org> Subject: I support Lupine Plaza Please let all my Council Members know that I support the Lupine Plaza Project. The plaza offers a convenient meeting place, a shady spot to grab a snack, and seating for shoppers wanting to take a break. I can't identify any downsides to the project. Gayle Moore 24 Calle Lantana Palm Desert, CA 92260 760-773-2740 Supplemental Item 2C-22 Supplemental Item 2D-1 Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-1 Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-2 Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-3 Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-4 Pre-Design YMCA I 5 Conceptual Design Schematic Design Cost Modeling YMCA PRE-FUNDING PROCESS TYPICAL SEQUENCE OF PHASES Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-5 Site Context Proposed Location 0 Existing Location Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-6 Market Area Proposed Location 0 Existing Location Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-7 YMCA I 8 PROPOSED SITE Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-8 YMCA I 9 ACCESS AND VISIB 'IL:ITY Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-9 YMCA I 10 .. -· View Towards East View Towards North View Towards South View Towards West VISIBILITY AND CONTEXT Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-10 YMCA I 11 7 I I I --..: --.... , •. the. SITE CONCEPT 1 Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-11 YMCA I 12 1 I I \ \ \ SITE CONCEPT 2 Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-12 YMCA I 13 SITE CONCEPT 2 Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-13 YMCA I 14 OUTDOOR CONNECTION ......... . . . . ..GYM WASH SWIM -COMMONS ••• TEEN COMMUNITY ADMI : YOUTH • • ••• •YMCA ENTRY CONCEPT DIAGRAM OPTION 2 Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-14 Contemporary YMCA Imagery Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-15 Contemporary YMCA Imagery FACILITY EXTERIORS Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-16 Contemporary YMCA Imagery LOBBY & COMMONS Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-17 Contemporary YMCA Imagery YOUTH & FAMILY Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-18 PALMER'S TEACHING KITCHEN Contemporary YMCA Imagery COMMUNITY & MULTI-PURPOSE Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-19 Contemporary YMCA Imagery GYM/ TIRACK / AQUATICS Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-20 Contemporary YMCA Imagery WELLNESS & 'GROUP EXERCISE Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-21 Contemporary YMCA Imagery OUTDOOR AIMENITIES Supplemental - YMCA Presentation-22