Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStudy Session Materials - Fire Station PPT 1-26-2023North Sphere Fire Station CITY COUNCILSTUDY SESSIONJANUARY 26, 2023 Agenda 2 Matrix Study Recap North Sphere Activity and Development FS 102 Project Scope, Schedule, Construction Budget Operations Budget Discussion Matrix Consulting Group –Fire Service Study Background •Retained in 2021 to conduct an analysis of the current fire services provided by CAL Fire •Presented to Council on February 14, 2022 Findings •To improve services, construct a fourth station on Gerald Ford Drive near Frank Sinatra Drive 3 North Sphere Fire Service Challenges 4 •Increasing response times •Availability of Fire Department resources •Increase reliance on mutual aid •Anticipated growth in the North Sphere North Sphere Development Area 5 •996,222 sf additional commercial in development (22% increase) •5,814 additional residential units in development (308% increase) North Sphere Fire Station (FS 102) Proposed Location 6 2.5-acre site owned by City COOK STREETFRANK SINATRA DRIVE •City has owned the proposed site since 2014 (former SARDA property) •Site is located within the IID electric service area •IID has capacity efficiency in the area •City has received a commitment that IID will serve the proposed site FS 102: Project Scope •Pending Design Contract •3 Apparatus Bays and Dorms for 12 employees* •9,718 SF initial construction •Accommodate future building expansion •Assess conditions of Fire Stations 33 and 71 •Pending Construction Management Contract •Offsite Improvements (to be procured) •Roadway widening •Traffic signal *3-Bay Fire Station is Required per MOU Agreement 7 FS 102: 3 Apparatus Bay Conceptual Layout 83**The greyed-out areas highlight possible future expansion of FS 102 FS 102 Projected Schedule 9 FS 102: Project Development Milestones •Award building design contract January 26, 2023 •Award construction management contract February 2023 •Award off-site improvements design contract March 2023 •Bid Construction in January 2024 •Estimated Construction Completion in Fall 2025 10 FS 102: Construction Funding and Costs 11 Funding Sources Amount Former PDRDA Bond Funds (Regional Benefit-PA4)​​15,992,919 Former PDRDA Bond Funds (PA2 Formerly part of I10 Project)​​3,000,000 County of Riverside (Arena Contribution)**​​2,500,000 County of Riverside (Additional Share inc FF&E)​​900,000 Fire Facilities Restoration Fund (235)​​1,300,000 Total City/County Sources 23,692,919 Estimated Costs On-Site Improvements Design 741,400 Construction 13,207,368 Allowance for City Premium Enhancement 2,000,000 Construction Management & Inspection 1,981,105 Owner Soft Costs (IT, Permits)2,367,634 Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment 1,555,000 On-Site Total 21,852,507 Off-Site Improvements Design 192,823 Construction 1,156,932 Construction Inspection 175,468 Off Site Total 1,525,223 Total Estimated Costs 23,377,730* Total On-Site Assumes estimate, 12% inflation, and 18% contingency **Arena is contributing $1.8 M toward a ladder truck, not included above Five –Year : Full Operations Projections (Pre Labor Negotiations) 8/05/20XX 12 SOURCES 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Structural Fire Tax $ 7,000,000 $ 7,140,000 $ 7,282,800 $ 7,428,456 $ 7,577,025 $ 7,728,566 $ 7,883,137 Reimbursement for Ladder Truck $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 Prop A Fire Tax $ 2,200,000 $ 2,244,000 $ 2,288,880 $ 2,334,658 $ 2,381,351 $ 2,428,978 $ 2,477,557 EMS Cost Recovery $ 2,400,000 $ 2,424,000 $ 2,448,240 $ 2,472,722 $ 2,497,450 $ 2,522,424 $ 2,547,648 Misc Fees (Permits,Fireworks,etc.)/Interest $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Vehicles Paid by General Fund $ 504,000 $ 208,000 $ 235,000 $ 225,000 Total Revenue:$ 13,224,000 $ 13,136,000 $ 13,139,920 $ 13,590,836 $ 13,575,825 $ 13,799,968 $ 14,253,343 USES 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Fire/EMS Cooperative Services Agreement $ 16,145,375 $ 17,685,273 $ 21,036,085 $ 21,373,618 $ 21,712,469 $ 22,052,416 $ 22,216,980 Wittman Billing Services $ 385,000 $ 385,000 $ 385,000 $ 396,550 $ 408,447 $ 420,700 $ 433,321 Federal Quality Assurance Fee $ 235,000 $ 235,000 $ 235,000 $ 242,050 $ 249,312 $ 256,791 $ 264,495 Contingency Fund $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 51,500 $ 53,045 $ 54,636 $ 56,275 Other (admin fees,utilities,R/M buildings,etc.)$ 242,500 $ 254,625 $ 267,800 $ 275,834 $ 284,109 $ 292,632 $ 301,411 Capital Projects $ 530,000 $ 293,000 $ 125,000 $ 179,000 $ 184,370 $ 189,901 $ 195,598 Capital Equipment $ 108,400 Capital Vehicles $ 504,000 $ 208,000 $ 235,000 $ 225,000 Total Expenditures:$ 18,200,275 $ 19,110,898 $ 22,098,885 $ 22,753,552 $ 22,891,751 $ 23,267,077 $ 23,693,080 Additional Funding Required $ (4,976,275)$ (5,974,898)$(8,958,965)$ (9,162,716)$ (9,315,926)$ (9,467,109)$ (9,439,737) Transfer in from the General Fund $ 4,600,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 9,000,000 $ 9,250,000 $ 9,250,000 $ 9,500,000 $ 9,500,000 Fire Fund Balance @ FY End (Fund 230)$ 3,759,199 $ 84,301 $ 125,336 $ 212,620 $ 146,695 $ 179,586 $ 239,848 *Does not include Arena Truck at 102 inthis cost estimate….potentially an additional $3,500,000/year **Also does not include Residual Pass-Thru Payment increases from former Redevelopment Agency. What has changed? DISCUSSION ITEMS DECISIONS NEEDED 2022/23 Study Session –Fire Station 102 Discussion Make findings of regional benefit to use bond funds to build County’s Requirement for 3 bay in exchange for $3M in funding and use of truck Costs associated with 3 bay station/plan to operate Cal Fire Labor Negotiations/Changes Short and Long-Term Financial Impacts and potential “solutions” •Increase Fire Tax •Increase Transient Occupancy Tax •Sales Tax Measure •Implement a CFD Service District •Utility User Tax Measure Cal Fire Staff Count Changes Five –Year : Full Operations Projections (Post Labor Negotiations) 8/05/20XX 14 SOURCES 2022/23 REV 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Structural Fire Tax (includes PT from County)$7,000,000 $7,000,000 $7,140,000 $7,282,800 $7,428,456 $7,577,025 $7,728,566 $7,883,137 Reimbursement for Ladder Truck $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Prop A Fire Tax $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $2,244,000 $2,288,880 $2,334,658 $2,381,351 $2,428,978 EMS Cost Recovery $2,400,000 $2,400,000 $2,400,000 $2,424,000 $2,448,240 $2,472,722 $2,497,450 $2,522,424 Misc Fees (Permits,Fireworks,etc.)/Interest $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Vehicles Paid by General Fund $504,000 $504,000 $208,000 $235,000 $225,000 Total Revenue:$13,224,000 $13,224,000 $13,068,000 $13,070,800 $13,520,576 $13,504,405 $13,727,366 $14,179,539 USES 2022/23 REV 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Fire/EMS Cooperative Services Agreement $ 16,145,375 $ 17,198,285 $ 19,267,535 $ 20,852,398 $ 25,293,143 $ 26,535,791 $ 27,840,570 $ 29,216,299 Wittman Billing Services $385,000 $385,000 $385,000 $385,000 $473,550 $497,228 $522,089 $548,193 Federal Quality Assurance Fee $235,000 $235,000 $235,000 $235,000 $289,050 $303,503 $318,678 $334,612 Contingency Fund $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $61,500 $64,575 $67,804 $71,194 Other (admin fees,utilities,R/M bldgs,etc.)$242,500 $242,500 $249,775 $262,264 $322,584 $338,714 $355,649 $373,432 Capital Projects $530,000 $530,000 $293,000 $125,000 $179,000 $125,000 $125,001 $125,002 Capital Office Equipment $108,400 $108,400 Capital Vehicles $504,000 $504,000 $208,000 $235,000 $225,000 Total Expenditures:$18,200,275 $19,253,185 $20,688,310 $21,909,662 $26,853,828 $27,864,809 $29,229,791 $30,893,731 Surplus/(Deficit)-Transfer Needed $(4,976,275)$(6,029,185)$(7,620,310)$(8,838,862)$(13,333,252)$(14,360,404)$(15,502,425)$(16,714,192) Transfer in from the General Fund $4,600,000 $4,600,000 $5,300,000 $8,900,000 $13,500,000 $14,500,000 $15,500,000 $16,500,000 Fire Fund Balance @ FY End (Fund 230)$ 3,759,199 $ 2,706,289 $ 385,979 $ 447,117 $ 613,865 $ 753,461 $ 751,036 $ 536,844 *Adds Ops for 102 (keeping 71 operational)and excludes operation costs for Arena truck anticipated at $3.5M/year. 23% increase in ops costs for 102 applied to Wittman, FQAF, other and contingency Projected Impact to Forecast/Reserve CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 15 Future Costs Approved from Reserve: •NS Park -$15M •Fire Station 33 Renovation $1.3M •Lupine Plaza $3.5M •Portola Community Center $700k •Traffic Op’s and Capacity $8M •El Paseo Mid-Block Crossing $450k •PD Link $4.95M FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 Estimated Revenue 73,257,157$ 75,429,953$ 76,521,473$ 78,766,791$ 80,641,690$ 82,574,874$ Estimated Expenditures 73,425,440$ 79,906,688$ 84,199,133$ 87,725,134$ 88,814,288$ 89,904,335$ Revenue over (under) expenditures ($168,283)($4,476,735)($7,677,660)($8,958,343)($8,172,598)($7,329,461) Est. General Fund Balance 108,163,585$ 78,758,850$ 69,231,190$ 53,892,847$ 44,970,249$ 37,640,788$ Unfunded CIP (from Reserve)(24,928,000)$ (1,850,000)$ (6,380,000)$ (750,000)$ -$ -$ Est. General Fund Balance 83,235,585 76,908,850 62,851,190 53,142,847 44,970,249 37,640,788 Est. General Fund Bal $83,235,585 $76,908,850 $62,851,190 $53,142,847 $44,970,249 $37,640,788 Non-Spendable 2,881,978 2,709,978 2,525,978 2,333,978 2,240,620 2,150,995 Current Reserve Policy ASSIGNED GF Operating Reserve (16.7% of Ops)10,174,541 11,194,285 11,846,619 12,369,022 12,550,911 12,732,949 COMMITTED GF Emergency Reserve (16.7% of GF Revenue)**12,233,945 12,596,802 12,779,086 13,154,054 9,711,538 2,242,580 Facilities Reserve (Capital Rplcmnt Reserve Study)*15,835,648 15,183,384 9,326,082 (0) CIP Reserve (20% of total 5-Year CIP-no Meas A)*9,824,410 5,385,619 5,915,689 4,864,326 Liability Reserve ($4M)4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Emplymnt Bene Reserve (50% for PERS change in Discount Rate)10,084,939 10,496,576 10,699,112 11,020,085 11,020,085 11,020,085 Other Fund Stability Reserve (equal to 16.7% T-fer O 1,394,455 1,436,288 1,479,377 1,523,758 1,569,471 1,616,555 Equip Replacement Reserve (100% of historical cost of assets balance)3,091,004 3,183,734 3,279,246 3,377,624 3,377,624 3,377,624 Econ Dvlpmnt/Land Acqn Reserve (proceeds from SARDA sales)1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Total Required Reserve 70,520,920$ 67,186,667$ 62,851,189$ 53,142,847$ 44,970,249$ 37,640,788$ Est. Unassigned Fund Balance 12,714,665$ 9,722,183$ 0$ 0$ (0)$ 0$ *Facilities and CIP Reserves are shown underfunded in last four years to cover revenue shortfall. Reserve Requirement is not being met per policy, based on anticipated budget increases. **GF Emergency Reserve is underfunded in last two years to cover revenue shortfall. Reserve Requirement is not being met per policy, based on anticipated budget increases. Options to Cover Anticipated Shortfall 8/05/20XX CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 16 OPTIONS/POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES ASSOCIATED INITIAL CHALLENGS ESTIMATED 1ST YEAR REVENUE GENERATION ADDITIONAL CHALLENGES MEETS CURRENT REVENUE NEEDS IDENTIFIED Increase to Prop A Fire Tax (Special) Requires 2/3rds approval of votes –ours does not sunset based on how it was approved. 70% failure rating in 2022 If the current $60 rate was doubled, an increase would generate approximately $2.2M The burden is carried by property owners and revenue restricted to fire related services. NO Increase to Transient Occupancy Tax (General) Requires majority (50% +1) of registered voters. 88% approval rating in 2022 If the current 11% rate was increased 1%, an increase would generate approximately $2.1M At 11% the City is currently in the middle of the rates charged throughout the Valley (9%-13.5%). NO Increase to Sales Tax (District Tax) General Requires majority (50% + 1) of registered voters. 88% approval rating in 2022 A District tax of 1%would generate $26.1M District tax may be introduced by any taxing entity within the City but is limited to 2% max. YES Create a Community Facilities District (CFD for City Services)* Requires all new development owners to opt in prior to entitlement Could deter desired development A Services CFD with the remaining undeveloped properties may generate an additional $5M District must be joined as condition of development approval. Funds are limited to project listed in district documents. NO Impose a Utility Users Tax (General)* Requires majority (50% + 1) of registered voters 68% failure rating in 2022 UUT of 15% would generate approximately $10M UUT’s have a sunset clause. Residents carry the burden at an est cost of $30/month. NO General vs. Special Tax 8/05/20XX CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 17 GENERAL TAX •A general tax is imposed to raise general-purpose revenues. •Majority of voters must agree to enact a general tax. •May only be submitted for voter approval at an election for city council or board of supervisors unless a unanimous vote of the governing board declares an emergency (Nov, 2024). SPECIAL TAX •A special tax is a tax imposed for a specific purpose. •A city may increase the sales and use tax by adding a special use tax for public safety, the acquisition of open space or transportation projects. •If the tax is for a specific purpose, the revenues may only be used for that purpose and must have a sunset. •Two-thirds of voters must agree to enact, increase or extend a special tax. Current TOT Rates in CV 8/05/20XX CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 18 City TOT Rate Coachella 9% Rancho Mirage 10% La Quinta 10% Palm Desert 11% Indian Wells 11.25% Cathedral City 12% Desert Hot Springs 12% Indio 13% Palm Springs*13.5% Palm Springs charges a separate rate for STRs at 11.5% District Tax Estimate (Year 1) based on Current Sales Tax 8/05/20XX CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 19 Category Year Ended Capture Incremental Tax Rate Percent Segment 2022Q3 Rate 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 General Retail 12,186,300 92%2,795,066 5,590,132 8,385,198 11,180,264 Food Products 4,959,851 99%1,232,230 2,464,460 3,696,690 4,928,920 Transportation 2,258,252 85%477,858 955,717 1,433,575 1,911,433 Construction 2,353,240 45%261,987 523,974 785,961 1,047,948 Business To Business 782,694 11%21,468 42,936 64,403 85,871 Miscellaneous 129,553 46%14,965 29,929 44,894 59,859 CITY TOTAL GROSS 22,669,891 85%4,803,574 9,607,148 14,410,721 19,214,295 City Share of County Pool 3,838,896 New Tax Rate Equivalent of City 26,508,787 6,627,197 13,254,394 19,881,590 26,508,787 Projected District Tax (Less 1.5% CDTFA Administrative Fees) Conservative 6,190,303 12,380,606 18,570,910 24,761,213 Most Likely 6,541,128 13,082,255 19,623,383 26,164,510 Optimistic 6,893,609 13,787,218 20,375,199 27,574,435 Projections provided by Avenu Insights and Analytics Current Rates in CV and Voter Approval Stats CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 20 Additional City Programs/Projects Already Competing for Funding •North Sphere Park and Associated Services/Programs •Public Safety Service Costs •Future NS Aquatic Facility Subsidy •Energy Infrastructure Needs for North Sphere Build-Out •Arena Annexation and Associated Services/Infrastructure Needs* * *Both cities have enacted or in the process of enacting a service CFD to offset costs. Sales (District Tax) Measures and Voter Approval in 2020 8/05/20XX CONFERENCE PRESENTATION 21