Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2022-10-25 ARC Regular Meeting Agenda Packet
City of Palm Desert Page 1 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA AGENDA (HYBRID MEETING) Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference and there will be no in-person public access to the meeting location. • To participate via Zoom, use the following link: https://palmdesert.zoom.us/j/83648797515, Zoom Webinar ID: 836 4879 7515. • To participate by telephone call (213) 338-8477 or (669) 219-2599, Zoom Webinar ID: 836 4879 7515. To provide a public comment please press *9 to raise your hand. • Written public comment may also be submitted to planning@cityofpalmdesert.org. Emails received by 9:30 a.m. prior to the meeting will be distributed to the Commission. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Commission as soon as practicable and retained for the official record. Emails will not be read aloud except as an ADA accommodation. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: This time has been set aside for the public to address the Architectural Review Commission on issues that are not on the agenda for up to three minutes. Because the Brown Act does not allow the Commission to act on items not listed on the agenda, members may briefly respond or refer the matter to staff for a report and recommendation at a future meeting. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one motion. The public may comment on any items on the Consent Agenda within the three-minute time limit. Individual items may be removed by Commissioners for a separate discussion. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Architectural Review Commission Special Meeting minutes of October 5, 2022. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Architectural Review Commission Regular Meeting minutes of October 11, 2022. Tuesday October 25, 2022 12:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Architectural Review Commission Agenda October 25, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 2 CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER: Items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion will be considered at this time. 5. ACTION CALENDAR A. FINAL DRAWINGS 1. CASE NOS: PP/CUP22-0006 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration to construct a 394-unit market-rate multifamily community consisting of thirteen three-story apartment buildings, a two-story fitness center, a single-story clubhouse, two (2) pool areas, and private outdoor recreation areas on an 18.67-acre site located at the southwest corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue (APNs: 620-400-030 and 620-400-031). APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Hayes Dietrich, LLC, Edina, MN 55436 LOCATION: SW Corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-22 (Planned Residential – 22 dwellings per acre) RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on staff’s analysis and approves a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of the Precise Plan application. 2. Modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval. 2. CASE NOS: MISC22-0009 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a new front entry façade modification and minor addition to the Palm Desert Community Center located within the Civic Center Park. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Desert Recreation District, Indio, CA 92201 LOCATION: 43900 San Pablo Avenue ZONE: Public (P) RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on staff’s analysis and approves Case No. MISC22-0009 as presented. 2. Any exceptions or modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval. 3. CASE NOS: PP/EA 22-0005 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan for West Coast Storage Architectural Review Commission Agenda October 25, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 3 Facility, a 53,604 square-foot personal storage facility located at the northwest corner of Dick Kelly Drive and Dinah Shore Drive. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Scott A. Mommer Consulting, Peoria AZ, 85383 LOCATION: NWC - Dick Kelly Drive and Dinah Shore Drive ZONE: Service Industrial (SI) RECOMMENDATION: 1. The ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on staff’s analysis and approves a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of the Precise Plan application with conditions of approvals as recommended by staff. 2. Signage shall comply with the Palm Desert Municipal Code and not utilize raceways, backers, or phone numbers. 3. The walls of the trash enclosure shall be finished with stucco to match the primary building. 4. All roof mounted mechanical equipment should be screened from all vantages of surrounding public areas with consideration to the varying parapet heights. 5. Any modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval. B. MISCELLANEOUS None 6. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONERS B. CITY STAFF C. ATTENDANCE REPORT 7. ADJOURNMENT: The next Regular Meeting will be held on November 8, 2022, at 12:30 p.m. Architectural Review Commission Agenda October 25, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 4 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda for the Architectural Review Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and City website not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Melinda Gonzalez Recording Secretary PUBLIC NOTICES Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Development Services Department, City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda items and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.cityofpalmdesert.org. Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the city will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. City of Palm Desert Page 1 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES (HYBRID MEETING) Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference and there will be no in-person public access to the meeting location. 1. CALL TO ORDER A Special Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission was called to order by Vice Chair McIntosh on Wednesday, October 5, 2022, at 12:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Dean Wallace Colvard, Nicholas Latkovic, Michael McAuliffe, Francisco Sanchez, and Vice Chair Jim McIntosh. Absent: Chair John Vuksic. City Staff Present: Chris Escobedo, Assistant City Manager/Director of Development Services; Richard Cannone, Deputy Director of Development Services; Rosie Lua, Planning Manager; and Melinda Gonzalez, Recording Secretary, were present at Roll Call. 3. NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: Vice Chair McIntosh opened and closed the non-agenda public comment period. No public comments were provided. 4. ACTION CALENDAR Associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at, https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission- information. Wednesday October 5, 2022 12:30 p.m. Special Meeting Architectural Review Commission Special Meeting Minutes October 5, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 2 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES A. FINAL DRAWINGS 1. CASE NOS: PP 18-0009 – Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of an Amendment No. 2 to the DSRT SURF project (PP18-0009 and SP/PP21-0002), adding 45 hotel rooms including revisions to the interior layout and exterior architecture of the hotel and surf center facility located at the 17.69-acre site within Desert Willow Golf Resort. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Desert Wave Ventures, PO Box 147, Solano Beach, CA 92075 LOCATION: Vacant 17.69-acre site within Desert Willow ZONE: Planned Residential (PR)-5 Planning Manager, Rosie Lua, narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the item and responded to Commission inquiries. Doug Sheres, Applicant, and their team including Bruce Greenfield with A.O. Architects, presented additional details on the project, and answered questions from the Commission. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Vice Chair McIntosh opened and closed the public comment period. No public comments were provided. Following discussion, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLVARD, CARRIED 5-0 (CHAIR VUKSIC ABSENT), to: 1. Approve Case Nos. PP 18-0009 - Amendment #2 (SP/PP21-0002) with conditions. 2. Reincorporate stone veneer on north elevation of hotel at vertical element flanking stair as shown in previous design. 3. Vertical element on north elevation of hotel which surrounds resort signage should be extended to ground plane, similar to previous design, but maintaining increased width of revised design. 4. Reincorporate stone veneer on west elevation of hotel on mass to the right side of stairs. 5. East elevation of hotel, revised design as presented is approved, do not incorporate break in plane with additional element as shown in alternative option. 6. Reincorporate entry canopy design at Surf Center, similar to previous design. 7. Formation of subcommittee of two ARC Commissioners, McAuliffe and Latkovic, to review revised design. B. MISCELLANEOUS None 5. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONERS None Architectural Review Commission Special Meeting Minutes October 5, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 3 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES B. CITY STAFF Planning Manager, Rosie Lua, reported that on September 29, 2022, City Council approved staff’s request to reduce the ARC’s membership count to seven members. The ordinance amendment requires a second reading for adoption and will have a 30-day waiting period before implementation. This change will allow the ARC to form a quorum with four members in attendance. 6. ADJOURNMENT The Architectural Review Commission adjourned at 1:46 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Melinda Gonzalez, Senior Administrative Assistant Recording Secretary ATTEST: Rosie Lua, Planning Manager Secretary APPROVED BY ARC: __/__/2022 City of Palm Desert Page 1 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA MINUTES (HYBRID MEETING) Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting was conducted by teleconference and there was no in-person public access to the meeting location. 1. CALL TO ORDER A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission was called to order by Chair Vuksic on Tuesday, October 11, 2022, at 12:31 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Dean Wallace Colvard, Nicholas Latkovic, Michael McAuliffe, Francisco Sanchez, Vice Chair McIntosh, and Chair John Vuksic. Absent: None City Staff Present: Chris Escobedo, Assistant City Manager/Director of Development Services; Richard Cannone, Deputy Director of Development Services; Rosie Lua, Planning Manager; Nick Melloni, Senior Planner, and Melinda Gonzalez, Recording Secretary, were present at Roll Call. 3. NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT Chair Vuksic opened and closed the non-agenda public comment period. No public comments were provided. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR Associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at, https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission- information. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, CARRIED 6-0, to approve the consent calendar. Tuesday October 11, 2022 12:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Architectural Review Commission Minutes October 11, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 2 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, CARRIED 5-0, to approve the Architectural Review Commission Regular Meeting minutes of September 27, 2022. 5. ACTION CALENDAR Associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at, https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission- information. A. FINAL DRAWINGS 1. CASE NO: MISC22-0019 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a design review of a façade modification of an existing retail storefront located at 73425 El Paseo, Suite 116. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: John Henry III, Phoenix, AZ 85022 LOCATION: 73425 El Paseo, Suite 116 ZONE: D.O. (Downtown Core Overlay District) Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the item and responded to Commission inquiries. John Henry III, Applicant, presented additional details on the project and answered questions from the Commission. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Chair Vuksic opened and closed the public comment period. No public comments were provided. Following discussion, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, CARRIED 6-0 to: 1. Approve Case No. MISC22-0019 as presented. 2. CASE NO: MISC22-0020 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a request for a design review of a private sport court on a residential property located at 45710 Verba Santa Drive. APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Richard Leventhal, Palm Desert, CA 92260 LOCATION: 45710 Verba Santa Drive ZONE: R-1, 20,000 (Single Family Residential) Architectural Review Commission Minutes October 11, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 3 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the item and responded to Commission inquiries. Rick Leventhal, Applicant, presented additional details on the project and answered questions from the Commission. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Chair Vuksic opened the public comment period. The following comments were provided: Geoff Gregory, a Palm Desert resident, voiced opposition for the project, noting concern regarding excessive noise. Kim McFarland, a Palm Desert resident, voiced opposition for the project, noting concern regarding excessive noise. There being no others desiring to speak, the public comment period was closed. Following discussion, MOTION BY VICE CHAIR MCINTOSH, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLVARD, CARRIED 6-0 to: 1. Continue Case No. MISC22-0020 to a date uncertain. 2. A sound analysis be conducted to record actual noise decibels to determine if the sports court is within the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) allowable noise requirements. 3. Staff will provide Commissioners further clarification of PDMC Noise Requirements, specifically on the “average” decibel of noise. During the course of deliberation, individual Commissioner(s) offered commentary as follows. The below points do not necessarily reflect consensus: • Consider the addition of another wall to further mitigate noise from the court. • Plant specimen should be sufficient for proper noise mitigation, ideally 24-inch box Ficus, spaced 24-inches apart. 3. CASE NOS: PP/CUP22-0006 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration to construct a 394-unit market-rate multifamily community consisting of thirteen three-story apartment buildings, a two-story fitness center, a single-story clubhouse, two (2) pool areas, and private outdoor recreation areas on an 18.67-acre site located at the southwest corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue (APNs: 620-400-030 and 620-400- 031). APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Hayes Dietrich, LLC, Edina, MN 55436 LOCATION: SW Corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue ZONE: PR-22 (Planned Residential – 22 dwellings per acre) Architectural Review Commission Minutes October 11, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 4 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the item and responded to Commission inquiries. Cody Dietrich, Applicant, and his team including, Nathan Cantley with ESG Architecture and Design, and Mike Rowe with MSA, presented additional details on the project and answered questions from the Commission. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners providing comments and concerns for the project. Chair Vuksic opened the public comment period. The following comments were provided: Maria Crema, a Palm Desert resident, voiced opposition for the project, noting concerns regarding density and visibility of items stored on balconies. Jeff Cameron, a Palm Desert resident, voiced opposition for the project, noting concern that the elevation design which faces the Retreat development is bland and boxy. There being no others desiring to speak, the public comment period was closed. Following discussion, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, CARRIED 6-0 to: 1. Continue Case No. PP/CUP22-0006 to a date uncertain. 2. Provide a more comprehensive landscape plan for street facing frontages and main entry on Frank Sinatra and Portola Avenue. 3. Provide more elements for texture and variation to enhance entryway including entry gate design and roundabout, such as decorative pavers and increased landscaping. 4. Revisit setbacks with consideration to the heights of the buildings to provide an increase to proposed setbacks. 5. Revisit design and explore options for enclosing street facing stairwells. 6. Provide more articulation and design elements to enhance corner of Frank Sinatra and Portola Ave. including signage, landscaping, layering, and height variation for more interest to this prominent corner. 7. Consider incorporating more green space in plan (Area #8), utilizing elements of alternative option as shown by applicant. 8. Revisit balconies, provide design which allow balconies to integrate with the building, incorporate variation for balcony design as opposed to uniformity and explore solid railing as an option to mitigate concerns for visibility of stored items. 9. Revisit scale of buildings and incorporate a hierarchy of buildings to break down massing and avoid repetitive building masses. 10. Provide more variation and design for exterior wall surrounding community. 11. Revisit architecture of garages and incorporate elements which better relate to architecture of residential units. 12. Ensure openings of enclosures for mechanical equipment are not visible from all vantage points. 13. Provide variation in parapet heights to avoid repetition. 14. Break down building masses and create more interest through use of one and two- story elements that overlap different vertical pieces of the building. 15. Provide more architectural elements to elevator housing to avoid utilitarian look. Architectural Review Commission Minutes October 11, 2022 City of Palm Desert Page 5 ALL ACTIONS ARE DRAFT, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES B. MISCELLANEOUS None 6. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONERS In response to inquiry, Planning Manager, Rosie Lua reported a study session will be scheduled for ARC Commissioners as soon as possible, with consideration to upcoming action items scheduled for ARC review. B. CITY STAFF None C. ATTENDANCE REPORT The attendance report was provided with the agenda materials. The Commission took no action on this matter. 7. ADJOURNMENT The Architectural Review Commission adjourned at 3:21 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Melinda Gonzalez, Senior Administrative Assistant Recording Secretary ATTEST: Rosie Lua, Planning Manager Secretary APPROVED BY ARC: __/__/2022 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Senior Planner Date: October 25, 2022 Case No: PP/CUP 22-0006 Subject: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration to construct a 394-unit market-rate multifamily community consisting of thirteen three-story apartment buildings, a two-story fitness center, a single-story clubhouse, two (2) pool areas, and private outdoor recreation areas on an 18.67-acre site located at the southwest corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue (APNs: 620-400-030 and 620-400- 031). BACKGROUND On May 11, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-66 approving a 159 single- family unit residential project known as Catavina (PP 05-25 and TT 33719) on the 18.67- acre project site. Conditions of the approved entitlement have since expired and are no longer valid. On June 28, 2022, the applicant, Hayes Dietrich, LLC, presented the proposed project before the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) as a non-action item. The Commission took no formal action on the project but provided design feedback and comments to be considered into the project design. On August 23, 2022, the project appeared before the ARC, however due to lack of a quorum could not be heard and was rescheduled to a future date. On September 1, 2022, City staff held a community meeting open to Palm Desert residents to discuss the history of the General Plan adoption in 2016, the subsequent 2017 zoning consistency update, and the proposed project. Resident attendees of the meeting voiced concerns over the project’s location and height in relation to surrounding existing communities. Page 1 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 2 of 16 October 25, 2022 Following these meetings, staff directed the applicant to address public comments on the project raised prior to the ARC meeting in written comments, and community engagement meetings held by the applicant and City staff. These comments included concerns over modifications to the surrounding area, sight lines, traffic, and parking. The applicant provided an extensive response to these comments which are provided in the signed letter dated October 3, 2022, attached to this staff report. Additionally, the applicant has provided additional renderings to illustrate how the proposed project will fit into the existing context of the surrounding area. On October 11, 2022, the project appeared before the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) taking action to continue the case to a date uncertain in a 6-0 vote. provided design correction comments and continued the case to a date uncertain in a 6-0 vote. The design correction comments, and applicant responses are found on Table 2. PROJECT SUMMARY A. Property Description: The project site is a vacant 18.67-acre property and undeveloped (APNs: 620-400-030 and 620-400-031). The project’s northern boundary is delineated by Frank Sinatra Drive which is a fully developed road with curb and gutter. The eastern boundary is delineated by Portola Avenue which is a fully developed road with curb and gutter. The western boundary is delineated by combination transmission and distribution power poles and a Southern California Edison dirt-road easement, as well as two maintenance buildings and associated parking lot at the southwest corner of the project. Residential single-family neighborhoods are located north of the project and Desert Willow Golf Resort and the Retreat at Desert Willow Condominiums are located to the east. West of the site is an approximately 80-acre vacant property. B. Zoning, General Plan and Adjacent Uses: Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations Existing Uses General Plan Zoning Project Site Vacant Town Center Neighborhood (TCN) 7- 40 Dwelling Units Per Acre Planned Residential – 22 dwelling units per acre (PR-22) North Single-family Residential Conventional Suburban Neighborhood (CSN) PR-5 South Vacant TCN PR-22 East Single-family Residential Condominiums Resort & Entertainment PR-8 West Vacant TCN PR-22 Page 2 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 3 of 16 October 25, 2022 In 2016, the City of Palm Desert adopted a comprehensive update of the General Plan which changed this property’s land use designation to Town Center Neighborhood which allows for seven (7) to forty (40) dwelling units per acre (du/acre). On June 22, 2017, the City Council approved a subsequent Citywide Zoning Update (ZOA 17-105) which included this property and increased the density from Planned Residential (PR- 9), nine (9) du/acre to Planned Residential (PR-22), 22 du/acre. PROJECT SUMMARY Project Description The proposed project includes a Precise Plan (PP) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to develop a gated community of 394-unit market-rate apartments on a 18.67-acre vacant site located at the southwest corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue. Section 25.10.030 Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements Table 25.10-1 Use Matrix for Residential Districts states that multifamily dwellings require a CUP for land use compatibility. The proposed project includes the following: • Twelve (12) three-story walk-up residential buildings. • One (1) three-story residential building with elevators and an underground parking garage. • One (1) single-story 17,311 square-foot clubhouse building consisting of a movie theater, pet spa, game room, coffee bar, and clubroom. • One (1) two-story 4,602 square-foot fitness building. • Two (2) outdoor swimming pools. • One (1) basin for onsite stormwater retention. • 816 onsite parking spaces with 659 spaces provided at the surface and 157 within an underground parking garage. • Outdoor amenities include grilling stations, fire pits, yoga lawn, putting green, bocce ball, and community park. The proposal includes an alternative site plan which will require a separate approval from planning commission. The alternative proposal provides 672 onsite parking spaces at a parking ration of 1.71 spaces per unit to provide additional community open space amenities including a dog run south of Building 10 and park amenity between Building 8 and Building 9. Design Changes After the October 11, 2022 ARC meeting, the proposed project was resubmitted with several changes to the project design in response to ARC comments as summarized on the following pages: Page 3 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 4 of 16 October 25, 2022 Table 2 – ARC Design Response ARC Comment Design Response Provide a more comprehensive landscape plan for street facing elevations, frontages, and main entry, on Frank Sinatra and Portola Avenue. The applicant has increased the total quantity of tree plantings along street frontages with additional enhanced landscaping at the primary project entry and corner facing the intersection of Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive. Provide more elements for texture and variation to enhance entryway including entry gate design and roundabout such as decorative pavers and increased landscaping. The applicant has incorporated additional design elements at the primary entry such as decorative paving, decorative entry gates, stone cladding on walls. Revisit setbacks with consideration to the heights of the buildings to provide an increase to proposed setbacks. The applicant has provided variation in the setback with some buildings achieving a 45’-0”+ setback to provide relief. The Planned Residential zone requires a minimum 20’-0 setback along perimeter street frontages. The project complies with the 20’-0” minimum required setback along the perimeter. Page 4 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 5 of 16 October 25, 2022 Revisit design and explore options for enclosing street facing stairwells. The applicant has not enclosed street facing stairwells citing concerns for safety due to having glass, difficulty with ventilation and air flow by enclosing the hallways, and energy use from conditioning the interior hallway space. Provide more articulation and design elements to enhance corner of Frank Sinatra and Portola Ave. including signage, landscaping, layering, and height variation for more interest to this prominent corner. The applicant has redesigned the corner to feature additional landscaping, decorative low walls, and revised the architecture to provide more variation in the side elevations of the buildings by using an angled parapet roofline. Consider incorporate more green space in plan (Area #8), utilizing elements of alternative option as show by applicant. The applicant has added additional landscape along the perimeter of the site and varied the fence design to include more hedge shrubs. Adding additional green space within the site will require a parking adjustment or variance to be approved to reduce the amount of require parking. The applicant is proposing the minimum number of parking required to comply with City requirements. Revisit balconies, provide design which allow balconies to integrate with the building, incorporate variation for balcony design as opposed to uniformity and explore solid railing as an option to mitigate concerns for visibility of stored items. The applicant has revised the design of the balcony to feature thicker railing to reduce visibility into the balcony areas from neighboring properties. The applicant has also added wingwalls on second floor balconies for added privacy Page 5 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 6 of 16 October 25, 2022 Revisit balconies, provide design which allow balconies to integrate with the building, incorporate variation for balcony design as opposed to uniformity and explore solid railing as an option to mitigate concerns for visibility of stored items. The applicant has revised the design of the balconies by thickening balcony posts and railing slats. On the three-story elevation building the applicant has added stone columns running from the base to the third floor. Revisit scale of buildings and incorporate a hierarchy of buildings to break down massing and avoid repetitive building masses. The applicant has incorporated changes such as revised building corners, alternating parapet heights, adding additional stone cladding, and additional color changes variation. Page 6 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 7 of 16 October 25, 2022 Provide more variation and design for exterior wall surrounding community. The applicant has added variation to the perimeter fencing by incorporating sections of open pickets with landscape in combination with walls and pilasters with decorative caps. Revisit architecture of garages and incorporate elements which better relate to architecture of residential units. The applicant has added a stone section to the walls at the ends of the garages to tie these structures to the amenity building. Ensure openings of enclosures for mechanical equipment are not visible from all vantage points. The applicant has not altered the rear of the mechanical equipment. Provide variation in parapet heights to avoid repetition. The applicant has incorporated an angled parapet on buildings throughout the site to create a variation for the building architecture. Break down building masses and create more interest through use of one and two- story elements that overlap different vertical pieces of the building. The applicant has revised the elevations to provide additional variations. Page 7 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 8 of 16 October 25, 2022 Building D Elevations Building C Elevations Building B Elevations Building A Elevations Building D Elevations Building C Elevations Building B Elevations Building A Elevations Provide more architectural elements to elevator housing to avoid utilitarian look. The accent-colored louvers have been removed from the elevator overrun. Page 8 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 9 of 16 October 25, 2022 Site Plan The Portola Avenue frontage is lined with seven (7) apartment buildings with varying setbacks with a parking lot located at the south end of the site and parking area between Buildings 8 and 9 on the south end of the site. Buildings are generally oriented to provide access to the units directly from the parking areas. Parking areas are generally screened from public view by the apartment buildings and a combination block wall with wrought iron fence for the edge condition. The corner of the site (Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive) has a large open space area that will be fully landscaped. Frank Sinatra Drive is lined with three (3) three-story buildings and directly south is an “L”-shaped three-story building with underground parking. The central portion of the site has two (2) three-story buildings, a single-story clubhouse, a two-story fitness center, and two (2) swimming pools. Figure 1 – Site Plan Page 9 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 10 of 16 October 25, 2022 Access and Circulation The gated community is designed with three (3) vehicular access driveways including Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive. The primary vehicular entrance is located along Portola Avenue at the center of the site (approximately 790 feet south of Frank Sinatra Drive). There are two (2) secondary access points. The first secondary access point is located along Portola Avenue at the southern portion of the site, the second is located along Frank Sinatra Drive at the western portion of the site. Applicable restrictions for all access points are listed below: • Primary access (Portola Avenue) – Northbound left-in via median and southbound right-in and right-out. • Secondary access (Portola Avenue) – Southbound right-out. • Secondary access (Frank Sinatra Drive) – Westbound right-out. A resident traveling eastbound would make a U-turn at the intersection of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue. The site plan provides pedestrian connections throughout the site with pathways and links between apartment buildings and onsite amenities. Trash enclosures are also located throughout the project within the parking areas behind the buildings to minimize visibility from public frontages and traffic conflicts. The project includes a six-foot high combination wall consisting of block and wrought iron around the perimeter of the project, metal gates at the entries, and a monument sign located on the corner of Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive. Parking The project provides 816 parking spaces throughout the community, including 157 below surface parking spaces. Approximately 285 of the surface spaces will be covered. The design for the carports consists of metal as shown on the architecture plans. The remaining parking spaces are uncovered spaces. The project also includes an alternative site plan showing reduced parking ratio alternatives of 672 parking spaces, 741 parking spaces, and 768 parking spaces to demonstrate parking plans with reduced parking rations which are intended to improve the project by providing additional open space amenities. Architecture The architecture for the residential buildings provides a contemporary style which is complimentary to the surrounding desert environment. The style is characterized by Page 10 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 11 of 16 October 25, 2022 overhangs and trellises, balconies and patios, horizontal and varying wall planes, large window groupings, and a desert color palette with natural stone wall facades. The architecture of the 12 walk-up buildings includes light stucco masses at the corners that are defined by lighter colors and recessed windows. The darker stucco masses and chimney elements vary the roof line and screen all rooftop mechanical equipment. The one (1) central multifamily building also uses lighter colors at the corners, however, implements an overhang along the top level and incorporates deeper window recesses along the bottom floors. The center sections of the building have a similar character to the perimeter walk-up buildings using slender stone walls at the balconies and patios. The architecture of the amenity buildings is proposed with a desert modernism style with long overhangs and butterfly roof elements that compliments the proposed residential buildings. Buildings and Screening Table 3 – Building Summary Building Type Number of Buildings Number of Stories Gross Floor Area Roof Line Height Walk-up 12 3 380,472 33 to 37 feet Multi-family 1 3 191,928 33 to 36 feet (tower elements at 40 feet Fitness Center 1 2 4,602 33 feet Clubhouse 1 1 17,311 18 to 27 feet Below is a breakdown of the bedrooms for the 394 units: • Studio 35 • One Bedroom 176 • Two Bedroom 171 • Three Bedroom 12 The applicant is proposing roof-mounted HVAC units, which are screened by a continuous parapet. Utility rooms for additional screening are provided at the ends of the ground floor of each residential building. Landscaping The proposed landscaping includes perimeter roadway frontages, retention areas, and common areas. Shade trees are located on the perimeter and internal drive aisles of the site. The proposed landscape plan has a low and moderate water usage planting material palette with mixes of desert native species for trees and shrubs. Page 11 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 12 of 16 October 25, 2022 The project includes the use of trees throughout the project. The perimeter of the site, open space amenities, areas between the buildings, and retention basin are lined with 48- inch box Desert Museum trees and 36-inch box Acacia Aneura trees and Prosopis Phoenix trees, and 24-inch Acacia Salincina trees. Also proposed throughout the project are a mix of low water usage five-gallon (5) shrubs, including Agave Americana, Agave Weberi, Dasylirion Wheeleri, Acacia Redolens, Muhlenbergia Capillaris, Leucophyllum Candidum, St. Elmo’s Fire, Bougainvillea, and several other shrubs and accent plants as shown on the landscape plan. The primary entrance off Portola Avenue includes a series of Date Palms. A material palette showing the proposed materials used for site amenities is also shown on the landscape plan. Community Engagement Per Section 25.60.060, the applicant must provide adequate community engagement efforts since the project site is more than five (5) acres. The applicant has held two (2) neighborhood meetings on April 25, 2022, via Zoom, and August 3, 2022, in-person at the Retreat at Desert Willow’s clubhouse. The applicant mailed flyers to residents within 1,000 feet of the project to invite residents to the meetings. At the April 25, 2022, zoom meeting, there were approximately fifteen (15) residents in attendance from the Retreat at Desert Willow. The applicant presented the project and many of the residents voiced concerns regarding density (too many units) and building heights (three-story). Many of the residents stated that they were unaware that the property allowed up to 22 units per acre and building heights up to 40 feet. The residents requested for the applicant to provide line of sight studies and look for ways to preserve mountain views. After the April 25, 2022, zoom meeting, staff and the applicant discussed the residents’ comments. The applicant agreed to relocate one of the three story buildings along Portola Avenue to the rear and replace it with an open space amenity area. Having the open space amenity area along Portola Avenue preserves some views for the residents at the Retreat at Desert Willow. At the August 3, 2022, community in-person meeting, there were seventeen (17) residents in attendance and approximately six (6) additional via Zoom. Most of the residents were from the Retreat at Desert Willow and a few from the single-family neighborhood to the north along Pele Place. The applicant presented the project including line of sight studies, the new site plan, and updated architecture. The residents voiced the same concerns with density (too many units) and building heights (three-story). The residents and applicant discussed rents and the residents were happy that it was a market rate project. Page 12 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 13 of 16 October 25, 2022 The meeting concluded with a few residents stating that the City needs to reexamine the density and building heights for the surrounding area because its taking away from the Palm Desert resort atmosphere. ANALYSIS Development Standards The proposed development complies with all setbacks (front, rear, and side yards), building height, lot coverage, and parking requirements of the Planned Residential (PR) zone. The proposed development standards are analyzed for conformance below: PR-22 zone development standards: Table 4 – Project Conformance Summary STANDARD PR-22 ZONE PROJECT CONFORMS Height 40’-0” 33’ to 37’ (tower elements 40’) Yes Front Setback - 20’ to 46’ Yes Rear Setback - 24’ to 60’ Yes Street Side Setback - 22’ Yes Parking 788 Onsite Spaces 816 Onsite Spaces Yes Density: The PR zone allows a minimum of four (4) du/ac and a max of forty (40) du/ac pursuant to PDMC, Table 25.10-3. The zone allows for a maximum density of twenty-two (22) du/ac, and the project is requesting twenty-two (22) du/ac, which is within the threshold of the PR zone allowance. Height: The PR zone allows for three-story buildings up to a maximum height of 40 feet pursuant to Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.10.050(B)(11). The three-story buildings vary in roof heights between 33 feet and 37 feet with tower elements at 40 feet which is permitted by the zoning ordinance. Parking: Section 25.46.040 Parking Requirements of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) establishes that multi-family dwellings require a minimum of two (2) parking spaces per unit. The 394-unit project would require a minimum of 788 onsite parking spaces per this standard. The project is proposing 816 parking spaces which meets the minimum parking requirement. Page 13 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 14 of 16 October 25, 2022 ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY ARC approval is required for all Precise Plan applications per PDMC Section 25.68.020 (A). Findings for ARC decisions are listed under PDMC Section 25.68.040 – Findings of the ARC. Findings for the project are listed below: To approve a design review application, the ARC shall find the following: A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. The proposed development complies with all setbacks (front, rear, and side yards), lot coverage, and parking requirements of the PR zone. Specifically to heights, PR allows for a building height of 40 feet. The three-story buildings vary in roof heights between 33 feet and 37 feet with tower elements at 40 feet, which complies with the zoning standards. B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. The proposed project is located along the Portola Avenue and Frank Sinatra Drive corridors which are balanced arterial roadways as defined by the General Plan Circulation Element (Chapter 4). Development along this corridor includes a mix of residential densities and housing types including, existing detached single-family residential and multifamily uses. To the east is a vacant site approximately 80 acres that allows up to 22 du/ac. Directly kitty-corner to the site is a vacant 170 acres that has a specific plan. The specific plan designates the corner for both Neighborhood Low (4-8 du/ac) and Neighborhood Medium (7-24 du/ac). The density of the proposal is 22 du/ac, which is consistent with the PR-22 zoning designation. This density is also consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Town Center Neighborhood which allows for 7 to 40 du/ac. The project includes a traffic study and it is anticipated the project will not generate traffic demand or congestion for the area. C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the General Plan of the City. The proposed project is compatible with the existing development pattern within the surrounding area and with the zoning designations for the surrounding vacant sites. The property is designated Town Center Neighborhood in the General Plan. Land Page 14 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 15 of 16 October 25, 2022 Use Policy No. 3.21 (Infill Neighborhoods), in existing developed areas, the City encourages development that repairs connectivity, adds destinations, and encourages complete neighborhoods. The project is designed with internal pedestrian access and provides common area recreational amenities available to all onsite residents (tenants). The proposed project includes private streets, pathways, and open spaces intended to allow residents (tenants) to enjoy the project’s amenities, while being able to connect to public pathways, thereby creating a pedestrian and family-oriented atmosphere. In addition, Land Use Policy 3.3 (Variety of types of neighborhoods) Promote a variety of neighborhoods within the City and ensure that neighborhood types are dispersed throughout the City. The existing homes in the area are a for sale product and the proposed project supports the expansion of housing by providing a for-rent development within the City. The project promotes multifamily residential that is in keeping with the mix of higher and lower densities in the area including, single-story residential developments, which meets the intent of this policy. D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. The proposed design for the residential buildings features a contemporary style including modern overhangs and trellises, balconies and patios, horizontal and varying wall planes, large window groupings, and a desert color palette with natural stone walls. The architecture of the amenity buildings takes on a desert modernism style with long overhangs and butterfly roof elements. The project also includes extensive onsite landscaping and open space areas which are located in central areas for use by all tenants of the apartment community. E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. The PR zone permits multi-family use through a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The project as proposed at 22 units per acre conforms to all development standards of the PR zone. A summary of the conformance with these development standards, including setbacks, building height, and parking is provided in the analysis under Table 4. As summarized, the project conforms with all applicable development standards. F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project includes hard surface pedestrian pathways and connections from the public right of way to ensure walkability throughout. All engineering documents including the preliminary grading plan and water quality management Page 15 of 118 PP/CUP 22-0006- 394-Units Frank Sinatra/Portola Avenue Page 16 of 16 October 25, 2022 plan are under review to ensure the design of the project incorporates the proper improvements including adequately sized retention basins for onsite drainage. In addition, the overall building design ensures the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on the analysis and approves a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of the Precise Plan application. Staff further recommends that modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval. Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits from Applicant 2. Alternative Parking Options Plan 3. Statement Letter from Applicant dated October 19, 2022 4. Notice of Action dated October 21, 2022 5. Previously provided Public Comments Page 16 of 118 PROJECT LOCATION Vicinity Site Location FRANK SINATRA RD PORTOLA AVEPROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:38 AMA0 TITLE SHEET 221570 ESG ESG Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 FRANK SINATRA DRIVE & PORTOLA - LAND USE SUBMITTAL DRAWING INDEXPROJECT TEAM OWNER/DEVELOPER: ARCHITECT: CIVIL ENGINEER: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: GENERAL CONTRACTOR: LEGAL: Hayes Dietrich, LLC 5021 Vernon Ave. S, Suite 201 Edina, MN 55436 Contact: Cody Dietrich Ph: 507-440-5702 Elness Swenson Graham Architects Inc. 500 Washington Ave. South, Suite 1080 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Contact: Christine Pecard Ph: 612-339-5508 Fx: 612-339-5382 MSA Consulting 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Contact: Mike Rowe Ph: 760-320-9811 MSA Consulting 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Contact: Mike Rowe Ph: 760-320-9811 Hayes Dietrich Construction, LLC 5021 Vernon Ave S, Suite 201 Edina, MN 55436 Contact: Calvin Hayes Phone: 612-202-1934 Nethery/ Mueller/ Olivier, LLP 41-750 Rancho Las Palmas, Bldg. H Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Contact: Daniel E. Oliver Phone: 760-837-0333 DRAWING INDEX ARC DRAWING NUMBER DRAWING NAME GENERAL INFORMATION A0 TITLE SHEET A1 PROJECT METRICS CIVIL C1 TECHNICAL SITE PLAN C2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C3 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN LANDSCAPE L1 OVERALL TREE PLAN L2 ENTRY & CORNER ENLARGEMENT L3 FITNESS AREA ENLARGEMENT L4 MAIN POOL ENLARGEMENT L5 PLANT PALETTE-SHRUBS ARCHITECTURAL A3 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE A A4 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE A A5 COLORED ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE A A6 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE B A7 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE B A8 COLORED ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE B A9 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE C A10 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE C A11 COLORED ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE C A12 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE D A13 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE D A13.1 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE D A14 COLORED ELEVATIONS - RESIDENTIAL TYPE D A15 LEVEL P1 - MULTIFAMILY BUILDNG A16 LEVEL 1 - MULTIFAMILY BULDING A17 LEVEL 2 & 3 - MULTIFAMILY BUILDNG A18 UNIT PLANS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING A19 UNIT PLANS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING A20 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - MULTIFAMILY A21 COLORED ELEVATIONS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING A22 COLORED ELEVATIONS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING A23 ROOF PLAN - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING A24 CLUB HOUSE BUILDING & POOL TERRACE PLAN A25 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - CLUBHOUSE A26 COLORED ELEVATIONS - CLUBHOUSE A27 COLORED ELEVATIONS - CLUBHOUSE A28 FITNESS BUILDING & TERRACE DRAWING INDEX ARC DRAWING NUMBER DRAWING NAME A30 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - FITNESS A31 COLORED ELEVATIONS - FITNESS A32 SITE SECTIONS A33 GARAGE, CARPORT, & TRASH ENCLOSURE PLANS A34 SITE SIGNAGE & FENCE SECTION ELEVATIONS A35 MATERIAL BOARD A36 VIEW FROM INTERSECTION AT FRANK SINATRA + PORTOLA A37 VIEW OF COMPLEX ENTRY FROM PORTOLA AVE A38 VIEW OF CLUBHOUSE A39 VIEW OF POOL AT FITNESS CLUBHOUSE A40 VIEW OF WALK-UP UNITS A41 VIEW OF ENTRANCE AT MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING A42 VIEW OF MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING A43 VIEW FROM PORTOLA AVE A44 VIEW FROM FRANK SINATRA A45 VIEW OF PARK ALONG PORTOLA A46 VIEW ALONG PORTOLA AVE A47 VIEW OF MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING A48 STREET VIEW ALONG FRANK SINATRA DR A49 STREET VIEW ALONG PORTOLA AVE A50 VIEW OF TRASH ENCLOSURE AND GARAGE A51 MISC DETAILS A52 MISC DETAILS A53 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCUALTIONS - TYPE A, B BUILDINGS A54 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCULATIONS - TYPE C, D BUILDINGS A55 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCUALTIONS - TYPE E BUILDING A56 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCUALTIONS - TYPE F & G BUILDINGS ELECTRICAL E1 SITE PHOTOMETRICS No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 17 of 118 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:38 AMA1 PROJECT METRICS 221570 Author Checker 05/09/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Unit Type Count %BED Studio 16 4%16 Alcove 19 5%19 1 Bedroom 176 45%176 2 Bedroom 171 43%342 3 Bedroom 12 3%36 Total Units 589394 Building Unit Type Unit Count/Building Total Unit Count Unit Area Total Area E M1 16 16 620 9,920 E A1 19 19 690 13,110 E B1 15 15 799 11,985 A B2 12 60 824 - D B2 12 12 824 59,328 E B3 14 14 856 11,984 B B4 12 36 865 31,140 C B5 12 36 863 31,068 E B6 3 3 943 2,829 E C1 13 13 1,233 16,029 C C2 12 36 1,220 43,920 B C3 12 36 1,290 46,440 E C4 6 6 1,405 8,430 E C5 3 3 1,405 4,215 E C6 3 3 1,396 4,188 A C7 12 60 1,385 - D C7 6 6 1,385 91,410 E C8 5 5 1,427 7,135 D C9 3 3 1,850 5,550 E D2 12 12 1,679 20,148 394 418,829 Residential Building Totals UNITS Site Metrics Area (GSF)Dus/Building Total Parking # Buildings Level P1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total/Building Total Area Standard Carport Garage Underground Site 263 256 140 Building A 5 Circulation (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 8,836 8,836 8,836 24 120 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)750 750 750 10,724 10,724 10,724 32,172 160,860 Building B 3 Circulation (Exterior)1,471 1,471 1,471 Residential 8,620 8,620 8,620 24 72 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)742 742 742 10,833 10,833 10,833 32,499 97,497 Building C 3 Common (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 8,332 8,332 8,332 24 72 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)830 830 830 10,300 10,300 10,300 30,900 92,700 Building D 1 Circulation (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 7,917 7,917 7,917 21 21 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)750 750 750 9,805 9,805 9,805 29,415 29,415 Building E (Multifamily)1 Common Circulation 2,931 8,247 5,937 5,937 Residential 33,125 38,424 38,424 109 109 Amenity 407 2,989 Parking 55,507 157 Total (Interior)58,845 44,361 44,361 44,361 191,928 191,928 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)3,302 3,302 3,302 Building F (Clubhouse)1 17,311 17,311 17,311 Building G (Fitness)1 2,553 2,049 4,602 4,602 15 594,313 394 816 2.07 Total Stalls Parking Ratio Page 18 of 118 NOPARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING FRANK SINATRA DRIVE PROP. BUILDING 1TYPE "C"10,300 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,300 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,300 SF (3RD FLOOR)30,900 SF (TOTAL)EX. C/L PROP. BUILDING 2TYPE "C"10,300 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,300 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,300 SF (3RD FLOOR)30,900 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 3TYPE "C"10,300 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,300 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,300 SF (3RD FLOOR)30,900 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 4TYPE "B"10,833 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,833 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,833 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,499 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 5TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 6TYPE "B"10,833 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,833 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,833 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,499 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 7TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 8TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 9TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 10TYPE "B"10,833 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,833 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,833 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,499 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 11TYPE "D"9,819 SF (1ST FLOOR)9,819 SF (2ND FLOOR)9,819 SF (3RD FLOOR)29,457 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 12TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 13TYPE "E"44,361 SF (1ST FLOOR)44,361 SF (2ND FLOOR)44,361 SF (3RD FLOOR)133,083 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 14LEASING / CLUBHOUSE17,311 SFPROP.BUILDING 15FITNESS2,553 SF (1ST FLR)2,049 SF (2ND FLR)4,602 SF (TOTAL)32.8'43.7'45.1'42.8'31.4'33.2'34.5' 17.8'20.5'30.5'20.5'16.2'18'30'18'PoolSpaYogaLawnPool2 1 . 8 ' 1 8 ' 3 2 ' EX. CURB & GUTTER 11.5' 22.8' 63' 20' 32.6' 46.3' 10.9'18' 13.9'55.6'309.6'17'20.5'74.1'14.9'20.5'45.1 '23.6'30.6'24'10'24'29.1'PRO P . E N T R Y KIOS K 16'18'30.5'20.5'EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY& LOT LINE (TYP.)30'30' 18'20.4'18'30'20.5'26.9'23' 23' 20' 26'20.5'26.4'18' 30' 18' 22.8 ' 24'EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY& LOT LINE (TYP.)EX. C/L (TYP.)PROP. SIGNAGEPROP. PROJECT BOUNDARY& R/W (TYP.)EX. C/L (TYP.)29'29'PORTOLA AVENUEN 27°46'33" E 840.48'N 01°21'56" E 1923.00'N 89°52'08" E 686.08'N 04°19'04" E 58.45'=23°27'29" R=1937.00' L=793.05'=11°29'14" R=1863.00' L=373.51'75'117.2' 59.4'21.6'21.6'21.6'18'23.1' 9' TYP. 18' 29.4' 30' 20.5' 39.8'68.1'19.5'20.5'30'20.5'21.9'22'18'18'21.4'15.2' 18' 30'81.2'60.3'20.5'10'PROP. LANDSCAPEPARKWAY (TYP.)10'PROP. LANDSCAPEPARKWAY (TYP.)PROP. LANDSCAPEPARKWAY (TYP.)10'EX. PROPERTIES TO BE MERGEDWITH FINAL DESIGN PLANSPROP. PROPERTY FENCE PER LANDSCAPE &ARCHITECTURE PLANS (TYP.)PROP. PROPERTY FENCE PER LANDSCAPE &ARCHITECTURE PLANS (TYP.)24' WIDE “ALL-WEATHER SURFACE” MADEUP OF A COMBINATION OF CONCRETE &TURF BLOCK ABLE TO WITHSTAND A FULLYLOADED FIRE VEHICLE TO THE SATISFACTIONAND APPROVAL OF THE FIRE MARSHALL18'24' WIDE “ALL-WEATHER SURFACE” MADE UP OF A COMBINATIONOF CONCRETE & TURF BLOCK ABLE TO WITHSTAND A FULLY LOADEDFIRE VEHICLE TO THE SATISFACTION AND APPROVAL OF THE FIRE MARSHALL20.5'30.5'20.5' 117.5'38.9'144.2'30'17' 15' 18' 30' 18' 6' 18' 30' 18'62.5'PROP. GENERAL EGRESS ACCESS ONLY.GATES WILL NOT SWING INTO EGRESS(TYP.)PROP. GENERAL EGRESS ACCESS ONLY.GATES WILL NOT SWINGINTO EGRESS (TYP.) 13.9' 13.5' 13.6' 13.7 ' 13.7 ' 13.9 ' 13.9'14.1'EX. CURB &GUTTER (TYP.)EX. CURB &GUTTER (TYP.)EX. CURB &GUTTER (TYP.)PROP. PROJECT BOUNDARY& R/W (TYP.)PROP. GARAGE (TYP.)PROP. GARAGE (TYP.)PROP. GARAGE (TYP.)PROP. CARPORT (TYP.)PROP. CARPORT (TYP.)PROP. CARPORT (TYP.)PROP. CARPORT (TYP.)PROP.CARPORT (TYP.)PROP.CARPORT (TYP.)32'17.8'PROP.GARAGE(TYP.)N 47°57'11" W29.27'Putting GreenMSA CONSULTING, INC.Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape ArchitecturePlanning Environmental Services Dry Utility Coordination GIS34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 | 760.320.9811 | MSAConsultinginc.comEASTNORTHSOUTHWESTCENTERLINEEASEMENTEXISTING(E)(N)(S)(W)C/LESMT.EX.ABBREVIATIONSACREAGEACCURB AND GUTTERC&GASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERAPNE/P EDGE OF PAVEMENTA.C. ASPHALT CONCRETEMAX. MAXIMUMBOUNDARYBNDRYM.B. MAP BOOKEXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONEEXISTING SEWEREXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED CURBPROPOSED EASEMENTEXISTING PROJECT BOUNDARYEXISTING SEWER FORCE MAINEXISTING WATERPROPOSED LOT LINEPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINEPROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARYEXISTING IRRIGATIONEXISTING GASEXISTING EASEMENTEXISTING ELECTRICEXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINEEXISTING CABLEEXISTING CONTOURSEXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONSLEGENDEXISTING LOT LINEEXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENTEXISTING TELEPHONEMIN. MINIMUMNUMBERPROPOSEDRIGHT OF WAYTYPICALNO.PROP.R/WTYP.P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTSF SQUARE FEETRADIUSRSTANDARDSTD.P/L PROPERTY LINEN.T.S. NOT TO SCALER-L LOW DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL)UG UNDERGROUNDOVERHEADO/HOPEN SPACE / PARKSOS/PPPAGEPG.PROPOSED PARKING STALLSXCUP SITE PLANDATA TABLEASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS:620-400-030 & -031EXHIBIT DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2022SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY:ADDRESS:INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY:DECEMBER 22, 2021EXHIBIT PREPARER:ADDRESS:MSA CONSULTING, INC.34200 BOB HOPE DRIVERANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270CONTACT:PAUL DEPALATIS, AICPTELEPHONE:(760) 320-9811REVISIONSNO. DATEIN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIALEGAL DESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTIONA PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST,SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.TELEPHONE:(951) 687-4252APPLICANT /ADDRESS:CONTACT:5021 VERNON AVENUE, SUITE 201EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436CALVIN HAYESHAYES DIETRICH, LLCLAND OWNER:EXISTING GROSS ACREAGELAND USE DESCRIPTION:AMENITY LANDSCAPE AREAS0.96 AC.41,666 SF5%TOTAL BUILDING AREA (GROUND FLOOR AREA)4.40 AC.191,203 SF24%8.41 AC.366,248 SF47%GARAGES, ACCESS ROADS, HARDSCAPE & PARKING18.31 AC.ACREAGE797,567 SFSF-PERCENTAGE- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "A" (5, 7-9 & 12)- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "B" (4, 6 & 10)53,760 SF32,499 SF1.23 AC.0.75 AC.--DATA TABLE (CONTINUED)EXISTING ZONING:PROPOSED ZONING:EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, 22 DU/AC. (P.R.-22)PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, 22 DU/AC. (P.R.-22)TOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOODTOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOODBUILDING DESCRIPTION:STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "A" (BUILDING NO(S). 5, 7, 8, 9 & 12)3 STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "B" (BUILDING NO(S). 4, 6 & 10)3 STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "C" (BUILDING NO(S). 1-3)3 STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "D" (BUILDING NO. 11)3 STORYPROPOSED PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION0.16 AC.6,756 SF-(FRANK SINATRA DRIVE)PROPOSED NET ACREAGE18.15 AC.790,811 SF100%PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "A"SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED659 STALLS240 STALLSONSITE PARKING DATA:COUNTPARKING RATIOUNITS / SF120 UNITS---(BUILDING NO(S). 5, 7, 8, 9 & 12)TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED394 UNITS-788 STALLSPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "B"(BUILDING NO(S). 4, 6 & 10)PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "C"(BUILDING NO(S). 1-3)PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "D"(BUILDING NO. 11)72 UNITS -72 UNITS -21 UNITS -144 STALLS144 STALLS42 STALLSDATA TABLE (CONTINUED)RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "E" (BUILDING NO. 13)LEASING / CLUBHOUSE BUILDING: (BUILDING NO. 14)1 STORY3 STORYFITNESS BUILDING: (BUILDING NO. 15)2 STORY- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "C" (1-3) 30,900 SF 0.71 AC. -- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "D" (11) 9,819 SF 0.23 AC. -- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "E" (13)44,361 SF 1.02 AC. -- PROPOSED LEASING / CLUBHOUSE BUILDING (14) 17,311 SF 0.40 AC. -- PROPOSED FITNESS BUILDING (15)2,553 SF 0.06 AC. -UNDERGROUND PARKING PROVIDED157 STALLS--SUB-TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED816 STALLS-2.07 STALLS PER UNITPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "E"(BUILDING NO. 13)109 UNITS -218 STALLSPUBLIC UTILITY PURVEYORS:ZONE "X": AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAINFEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION:LIQUEFACTION:MODERATE LIQUEFACTION ZONENOTES:1.ELECTRIC:GAS:TELEPHONE:WATER:CABLE:SEWER:USA:THIS MAP INCLUDES THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND DIVIDER.2. THERE ARE NO EXISTING DWELLINGS, BUILDINGS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES KNOWN ONTHIS PROPERTY.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYFRONTIER COMMUNICATIONSCOACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICTSPECTRUMCOACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICTUNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT(800) 684-8123(877) 238-0092(800) 921-8101(760) 398-2651(877) 719-3278(760) 398-2651(800) 227-2600SCHOOL DISTRICT:DESERT SANDS UNIFIEDAS SHOWN ON RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS,COMMUNITY PANEL MAP NUMBER: 06065C1595GEFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 28, 2008DATA TABLE (CONTINUED)TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED-2.07 STALLS PER UNIT 816 STALLSFRANK SINATRA & PORTOLAPROJECT NAME:LANDSCAPE, OPEN SPACE & RETENTION AREAS4.38 AC.191,694 SF24%R:\2746\Acad\Planning\Site Plan\2746 Technical Site Plan with Additional Parking.dwg, 10/3/2022 10:51:48 AM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc.Page 19 of 118 NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGMH MH MHMH MH MH MH MH MH AHEADAHEADAHEADAHEADAHEAD SIGNALSIGNAL SIGNALSIGNALSIGNALSP MH MH MH MH MH MH MH MH MH MH MH MH MH STOPSTOP STOPSP MH MH MH MH MH MH MH MH MH 265 265 265265 265270270 270 270 270 270 270 270 275 275275 275 275 275 275275275275275 275 280 280280 280280280 280 280 280 280 280280280255266.6274.1276.9277.4275.7276.3277.1280.5280.1279.3279.8279.5279.9280.2278.7278.4278.7278.6279.3276.6276.3275.7275.2277.4276.4274.9274.6274.2274.2273.6273.6273.1273.4272.7280.5279.5279.4280.2280.3279.7279.2278.8278.5278.3277.9279.7279.2279.6281.3281.2280.3280.2280.2280.5280.4280.6281.2281.2279.3284.2277.6278.6277.1280.2275.9277.9278.7279.2278.6278.2277.5278.3279.9279.6278.5276.4277.1277.2276.9276.9276.6276.6276.3277.0277.1275.2275.6274.4274.7274.5273.7273.3274.3275.6273.7273.5276.1276.4276.3274.4275.2274.5272.1273.7274.6273.1272.8273.4273.5273.7273.5272.5272.4272.3273.1272.7272.2273.2271.8272.3271.3271.9278.2272.7274.5272.6272.7272.5272.4271.4271.4270.4270.4269.3269.5268.4268.4270.8270.4269.9269.3268.8269.6269.2267.6267.6267.4270.3272.3272.5272.4269.4270.7268.7267.5268.1269.1269.5266.7266.6267.4267.2265.4265.8266.1265.5264.7266.5266.1264.6263.6263.7262.4269.7270.5273.3278.1277.8280.2280.2M PROP. BUILDING NO. 6FF = 276.3PE = 275.8 Prop. Trash Enclosure to IncludeRecycle & Organic Waste (Typ.) Prop. Trash Enclosureto Include Recycle &Organic Waste (Typ.) Ex. Curb & Gutter(Typ.) 8' Meandering SidewalkPer Landscape Plan Prop. Trash Enclosureto Include Recycle &Organic Waste (Typ.) Prop. Trash Enclosureto Include Recycle &Organic Waste (Typ.) PROP. BUILDINGNO. 5FF = 277.3PE = 276.8 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 4FF = 278.6PE = 278.1 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 3FF = 278.0PE = 277.5 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 2FF = 278.6PE = 278.1 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 1FF = 279.5PE = 279.0 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 13FF = 280.2PE = 279.7GFF = 269.2 PROP. BUILDING NO. 12FF = 277.0PE = 276.5 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 7FF = 276.0PE = 275.5 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 8FF = 275.4PE = 274.9 PROP.BUILDINGNO. 15FF = 276.1PE = 275.6 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 14FF = 278.0PE = 277.5 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 9FF = 272.9PE = 272.4 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 11FF = 273.5PE = 273.0 PROP. BUILDINGNO. 10FF = 272.0PE = 271.5 10'Prop. 10' LandscapeSetback 10'Prop. 10' LandscapeSetback Prop. 10'LandscapeSetback10'270.0BOTTOM Prop. R/W Expansion8' Meandering SIdewalk PerLandscape PlanEx. Curb & GutterFRANK SINATRA DRIVEPORTO L A A V E N U E63'Move Ex. CatchBasin to end ofcurb return 275' Re m o v e E x . M e d i a n t o c r e a t e l e f t t u r n ( I n O n l y ) P o c k e t 35' 279.5TC 278.9TC 279.3TC 278.7TC 277.1TC 277.0TC 277.8TC 277.6TC 277.7TC 277.9TC277.9TC 279.7TC 278.8TC 276.0TC 279.0TC 279.5TC 279.7TC 279.5TC 279.3TC 278.7TC 278.6TC 277.9TC 278.2TC 278.3TC 277.5TC 277.8TC 277.5TC 277.3TC 277.8TC 277.6TC 278.1TC 278.3TC 277.2TC 276.5TC 276.3TC 275.7TC 278.0TC 275.2TC 275.0TC 275.9TC 274.5TC 274.8TC 271.7TC 272.0TC 274.6TC 274.4TC 276.0TC 276.4TC276.4TC277.3TC 277.3TC 277.3TC 276.8 TC2763. FL 276.5 TC276.0 FLJOIN EX. 276.2 TC275.7 FLJOIN EX. 276.8 TC276.3 FL 275.5TC/LP 275.0TC/HP 271.0 TC270.5 FLJOIN EX. 270.3FL 269.9FL 270.2 TC269.7 FLJOIN EX. 277.0TC 277.0FL 273.9TC 273.2FL 273.6TC 272.8TC 272.5TC 271.8TC 271.0TC/LP 271.2TC 271.7TC271.5TC 272.0TC 271.2TC 271.8TC 270.2TC 270.4TC 270.0TC 272.0TC 272.7TC 273.8TC 273.2TC 273.0TC 273.8TC 274.2TC 274.1TC 270.6TC 274.1TC 271.5TC 271.5TC 272.8TC 274.9TC 274.7TC 275.5TC 275.7TC 276.1TC 275.5TC 275.7TC 275.7TC 275.3TC 275.6COPING 278.5RIDGE 276.5COPING 279.7TC 278.9TC 277.0FG 279.0TC 279.7TC 279.5TC 280.0TC 278.8TC 278.6TC 278.5TC 277.9TC277.7FL 276.0FG 276.0FG 277.0FG 277.0 277.0FG277.9FG 275.0FG 277.1TC 277.3TC 276.6FS 277.5TC 277.3TC 276.5FS276.2TC 276.0TC 276.2TC 276.8TC 276.6TC276.4TC 276.6TC 276.7TC 276.5TC 278.3TC 278.1TC 278.4TC 278.2TC 279.9TC 279.7TC 279.7TC 279.5TC 276.3TC 276.5TC 279.5TC 279.2TC 279.1TC 272.4TC 271.7TC 271.1TC 274.7TC 272.1TC 271.9TC 273.8TC 273.4TC 272.7FS 273.1FS 271.5TC 270.8FS 270.8FL 275.5FG 273.8FG275.0FG 277.7FG 275.0FG 273.0FG 273.0FG Prop. Property Fence per Landscape &Architecture Plans (Typ.)Prop. Property Fence per Landscape &Architecture Plans (Typ.) Ridg eRidge Prop. UndergroundRetention Basin (7'x80') 8' Meandering SidewalkPer Landscape Plan 20.5'34.25' POOL APN: 620-170-009 38105 PORTOLA AVEPALM DESERT CA 92260 APN: 620-400-029 38400 APN: 620-400-033 - APN: 620-400-010 - APN: 620-400-005 - APN: 620-472-060 - APN: 620-472-065 -40.727'Prop. 10'LandscapeSetback10'0.6%0.4%275.0TC/HP 5.2%5.1%70' REM O V E E X I S T M E D I A N T O CREA T E L E F T T U R N P O C K E T REMOVE EXIST CURB&GUTTER TO CREATEENTRY CROSS GUTTER PARCEL 2620-400-030VACANTEX. GENERAL PLAN:TOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOODEX. ZONING:PLANNED UNIT RESIDENTIAL(P.R.-22) 32.8' 43.7' 45.1' 42.8' 31.4'33.2'34.5'17.8'20.5'30.5'20.5'16.2'18'30'18'21.8'18'32'11.5'22.8'63'20'32.6'46.3'10.9'18'13.9'55.6'309.6'17'20.5'74.1'14.9'20.5'45.1'23 .6 ' 30.6' 24' 10' 24' 29.1'16'18'30.5'20.5'30'30'18'20.4' 18' 30' 20.5' 26.9'23'23'20'26'20.5 ' 26.4'18'30'18'22.8'24'29' 29' PARCEL 1620-400-031VACANTEX. GENERAL PLAN:TOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOODEX. ZONING:PLANNED UNIT RESIDENTIAL(P.R.-22) N 27 ° 4 6 ' 3 3 " E 8 4 0 . 4 8 ' N 01°21'56" E 1923.00'N 89°52'08" E 686.08'N 04°19'04" E 58.45' ∆=23°27'29"R=1937.00'L=793.05' ∆=11°29'14"R=1863.00'L=373.51' 75'117.2'59.4'21.6' 21.6' 21.6'18'23.1'9'TYP.18'29.4'30'20.5'39.8'68.1' 19.5' 20.5 ' 30' 20.5' 21.9 ' 22' 18' 18' 21.4'15.2'18'30'81.2'60.3'20.5'10'10'10'POR T O L A A V E N U E 18'20.5'30.5'20.5'117.5'38.9'144.2'30'17'15'18'30'18'6'18'30'18'62.5'13.9'13.5'13.6'13.7'13.7'13.9'13.9'14.1'32' 17.8' N 47°57'11" W29.27' Prop. 8'Sidewalk 80'REMOVE EXIST CURB&GUTTER TO CREATEENTRY CROSS GUTTERREMOVE EXIST CURB&GUTTER TO CREATEENTRY CROSS GUTTER 80' 276.2TC Prop. UndergroundRetention Basin (5 - 5'x100') Prop. Underground RetentionBasin (2,350 LF OF 5') Pro p . U n d e r g r o u n d Ret e n t i o n B a s i n ( 8 ' x 1 4 0 ' ) Pro p . U n d e r g r o u n d Ret e n t i o n B a s i n ( 8 ' x 1 4 0 ' ) 270.2 TC 269.7 TC 269.5 TC/LP 271.0 TC 271.0 TC 270.8 TC 271.3 TC270.4 TC 270.4 TC/LP 272.7 TC/LP 271.7 TC/LP 273.4 TC/LP 273.3 TC/LP 273.0 TC/LP 273.4 TC/LP 273.5 TC 273.7 TC 273.2 TC 276.7 TC 270.1FL 270.9 TC 270.5 TC 270.9 TC EX. POWER POLE TOBE RELOCATED270.0 TC/LP 274.3 TC 273.7 TC 273.1 TC 272.9 TC 272.8 TC 271.8 TC 272.0 TC 272.6 TC 273.3 TC/LP 272.5 TC 273.3 TC (273.7) EX. TC (274.3) EX. TCEX. POWER POLE AND GUY WIRETO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE(273.0) EX. TC (272.5) EX. TC (271.7) EX. TC (269.7) EX. TC (268.6) EX. TC (266.4) EX. TC (265.1) EX. TC (262.4) EX. TC (274.7) EX. TC (275.5) EX. TC (276.0) EX. TC PE 269.51600 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211 PE 269.22800 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211 PE 271.31700 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211 PE 271.91800 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211 PE 274.51900 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211 PUTTINGGREEN MH MH MH MH MH MHMH MH MH MHSTOP 275 275280280279.7 279.7 276.7 275.8276.2276.5 275.5 275.1 274.2274.6274.9 273.7 APN: 694391014 74085 DAISY LNPALM DESERTCA 92211 APN: 694391015 74091 DAISY LNPALM DESERTCA 92211 APN: 694392014 74109 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211 APN: 694392013 74123 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211 APN: 694392012 74137 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211 APN: 694392011 74151 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211 APN: 694392010 74165 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211 APN: 694392009 74179 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211 APN: 694392008 74193 PELE PLPALM DESERTCA 92211 FRANK SINATRA DRIVE 0'100' SCALE 1"=50' 50'150'200' MSA CONSULTING,INC. C i v il E n g i n e e r i n g L a n d S u r v e y i n g L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u r ePlanningEnvironmentalServicesDryUtilityCoordinationGIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 | 760.320.9811 | MSAConsultinginc.com Copyright 2022 All Rights ReservedMSA Consulting, Inc.c EAST NORTH SOUTH WEST CENTERLINE EASEMENT EXISTING (E) (N) (S) (W) C/L ESMT. EX. ABBREVIATIONS ACREAGEAC CURB AND GUTTERC&G ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERAPN E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT A.C. ASPHALT CONCRETE MAX. MAXIMUM BOUNDARYBNDRY M.B. MAP BOOK EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE EXISTING SEWER EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING PROJECT BOUNDARY EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN EXISTING WATER PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE PROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARY EXISTING IRRIGATION EXISTING GAS EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING ELECTRIC EXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINE EXISTING CABLE EXISTING CONTOURS EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS LEGEND EXISTING LOT LINE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING TELEPHONE MIN. MINIMUM NUMBER PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY TYPICAL NO. PROP. R/W TYP. P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SF SQUARE FEET RADIUSR STANDARDSTD. P/L PROPERTY LINE N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE R-L LOW DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL) UG UNDERGROUND OVERHEADO/H OPEN SPACE / PARKSOS/PP PAGEPG. DATA TABLE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:620-400-030 & -031 EXHIBIT DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2022 SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY: ADDRESS: INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. 7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503 DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY:DECEMBER 22, 2021 EXHIBIT PREPARER: ADDRESS: MSA CONSULTING, INC. 34200 BOB HOPE DRIVERANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270 CONTACT:PAUL DEPALATIS, AICP TELEPHONE:(760) 320-9811 REVISIONS NO. DATE IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST,SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. TELEPHONE:(951) 687-4252 APPLICANT / ADDRESS: CONTACT: 5021 VERNON AVENUE, SUITE 201EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 CALVIN HAYES HAYES DIETRICH, LLCLAND OWNER: %%UESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES RAW QUANTITIES SUBSIDENCE 3,326 1,333 RAW ADJUSTED 46,113 8,584 SHRINKAGE 1,515 EXPORT TOTAL EARTHWORK %%O169,998 %%O169,998 SUBTOTAL 71,223 39,639 OVER-EX (PADS)21,806 21,806 OVER-EX (PADS) SHRINKAGE 3,848 49,439 7,251 CUT (CY)FILL (CY) 130,359 {EARTHWORK NOTE: ASSUMED EARTHWORK ANALYSIS FACTORS:}{THE FOLLOWING FACTORS WERE USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THE EARTHWORK ANALYSIS:SHRINKAGE:. 15%SUBSIDENCE:.0.15'OVEREXCAVATION 3'DISTURBED AREA 18 ACRES ALL OF THE FACTORS WERE OBTAINED FROM SLADDEN ENGINEERING, PROJECT No. 544-22072, DATED MAY 17, 2022. SHRINKAGE: 10% - 20%SUBSIDENCE: 0.1' - 0.20'OVER EXCAVATION 3.0' EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY WAS PROVIDED BY INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC., DATED DECEMBER 22, 2021.} {EATHWORK NOTE:}{THE EXPORT SHOWN (45,437 C.Y.) ON THE PLAN, WILL BE EXPORTEDTO THE PROPERTY DIRECTLY (ADJOINTING PROPERTY) TO THEWEST. THAT PROPERTY IS UNDER THE SAME OWNERSHIP. } OVER-EX (STREETS)3,304 3,304 OVER-EX (STREETS) SHRINKAGE 583 PRELIMINARY GRADING & UTILITY PLAN PROPOSED PERIMETER FENCE & WALL COMBINATION. SEE ARCHITECT PLAN FOR DETAILS {PROJECT DATA} {GROSS ACREAGE 18.31 AC. NETACREAGE 18.15 AC.} SITE RAMON RD DINAH SHORE DR GERALD FORD DR FRANK SINATRA DR COUNTRY CLUB DR FRED WARING DR HWY 111 HOVLEY LN BOB HOPE DRMONTEREY AVEPORTOLA AVEEL DORADO DROASIS CLUB DRINT E R S T A T E 1 0 COOK STN.T.S. VICINITY MAP NORTH PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION UNDERGROUND RETENTION SYSTEM 98,775 PE 277.5100 RETREAT CIRCLEPALM DESERTCA 92211 R:\2746\Acad\Grading. reliminary\2746 Preliminary Grading Plan.dwg, 10/3/2022 9:25:05 AM, lcantabrana, MSA Consulting, Inc. Page 20 of 118 NOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGMSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape ArchitecturePlanning Environmental Services Dry Utility Coordination GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 | 760.320.9811 | MSAConsultinginc.com &R:\2746\Acad\Improvement Plans\Preliminary Water and Sewer\2746 Preliminary Utility Exhibit.dwg, 10/3/2022 9:33:29 AM, lcantabrana, MSA Consulting, Inc.Page 21 of 118 L-1-1 Overall Tree PlanFrank Sinatra & Portola | October 18, 2022 Port o l a A v e n u e Frank Sinatra DriveResidential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type D Type D Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Leasing/ Club-Leasing/ Club- house Building house Building Type FType F Fitness Building Fitness Building Type GType G Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type B Type B Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type B Type B BuildingBuilding Type C Type C BuildingBuilding Type C Type C BuildingBuilding Type C Type C BuildingBuilding Type E Type E2 7 3 8 4 5 5 5 1 1 6 10 10 Trees: Acacia aneura Prosopis x Phoenix Acacia salincina Parkinsonia x ‘Desert Museum’ Washingtonia fi lifera Phoenix dactylifera 12 Key Notes: Pool BBQ Putting Green Alternate Proof of Parking Retaining Area / Lawn 2 3 4 5 1 6 Yoga Lawn Alternate Proof of Parking Interlocking Concrete Paver 7 8 9 Alternate Proof of Parking Property Wall & Fence Combination 10 Property Wall (solid)11 Dog park12 11 11 11 4’ Ht CMU plaster block wall (color TBD) with 2’ Painted Metal picket fence view panels on top and CMU plaster pilasters at 30’ on center. 6’ Ht picket fence panels with planting along the base at select locations along perimeter wall and as indicated on plans Property Wall & Fence Combination 9 30’ Qty: +/- 80 Qty: 50 Qty: +/- 80 Qty: 100 Qty: 40 Qty: 23 Note: Trees to be planted in various size boxes between 24” & 48”. Some of the larger boxed trees to be utilized along perimeter planting areas (inside & outside project boundary wall) to assist with perimeter screening. Page 22 of 118 Entry & Corner Frank Sinatra & Portola | October 18, 2022 Key Notes: Automatic Entry/Exit Gates Secured Man-Gate Entry Keypad Kiosk Stone Wall Monumentation Entry and corner intersection Project Monument Icon at Roundabout Interlocking Concrete Paver 2 3 4 5 6 1 Character Imagery Key Map Porto l a A v e n u e Frank Sinatra DriveL-2-1 Screened Utility Boxes 7 Portola Avenue Main Entry 2 3 4 5 1 6 4 Raised Planter Monument Sign Public Sidewalk Property Wall & Fence Combination 9 8 Portola Avenue FRANK SINATRA DRIVE 10 11 6 9 8 10 11 4 4 Page 23 of 118 Fitness Club Area & Utility ScreeningFrank Sinatra & Portola | October 18, 2022 Yoga Lawn Cabanas Firepit with Tumbled Glass Walking Track Putting Green / Water Retention Basin 2 3 4 5 6 Character Imagery 2 1 4 Key Map Porto l a A v e n u e Frank Sinatra DriveL-3 Typical Utility ScreeningFitness Club area Screened Utility Boxes 7 7 5 Key Notes: Fitness Pool1 2 3 4 5 1 6 7 Page 24 of 118 Main Pool L-5 Frank Sinatra & Portola | October 18, 2022 Key Notes: Main Swimming Pool Seating Area Daybed FurnishingJacuzzi / Spa Cabanas Fireplace & Seating Area Covered BBQ & Counter 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 1 1 6 7 7 6 Character Imagery 6 4 3 Key Map Porto l a A v e n u e Frank Sinatra Drive7 Page 25 of 118 L-6 Frank Sinatra & Portola | October 18, 2022 Plant Palette - Shrubs Agave americana Hesperaloe parvifl ora ‘Yel- low’ Lantana ‘New Gold’ Tecoma x ‘Orange Jubilee’ Agave desmettiana Pedilanthus bracteatus Lantana montevidensis ‘White’ Tecoma x ‘Solar Flare’ Agave weberi Lophocereus marginatus Eremophila hygrophana Tecoma x ‘Gold Star’ Aloe barbadensis Hesperaloe tenufolia Polygaloides paucifolia Elaeocarpus decipiens Asclepias subulata Muhlenbergia capillaris Leucophyllum candidum Dasylirion wheeleri Acacia redolens Russelia x St Elmo’s Fire Dalea greggii Senna artemisiodes Fouquieria splendens Eremophila mingenew Senna phyllodinea Hesperaloe parvifl ora Lantana montevidensis Simmodsia chinensis Mojave gold Decomposed granite Copper canyon 3/4” gravel Page 26 of 118 UNIT B2UNIT B2 UNIT B2 UNIT B2 UNIT C7 UNIT C7UNIT C7 UNIT C7 ELEC.UTILITY136' - 1"85' - 1"28' - 10"3' - 1"21' - 3"3' - 1"28' - 10"3' - 4"8' - 2"13' - 7"6' - 3"18' - 2"7' - 9"21' - 5"28' - 10"21' - 5"7' - 9"18' - 2"6' - 3"3' - 8"10' - 9"LEVEL 1 PATIO LOW WALL TYP. 2' - 6" ROOF ACCESS ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY ROOF PARAPET TYP. INTERNAL ROOF DRAIN TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE SOLAR TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" ROOF HEIGHT 32'-0" TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TYP. SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS TRELLIS TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" 13' -6" x 19' -6"LIVING / DINING 12' -6" x 12' -2"KITCHEN 11' -0" x 10' -10"BEDROOM 5' -6" x 9' -3"BATH 9' -7" x 6' -0"BALCONY WATER HEATER 18' -8" x 15' -8"LIVING / DINING 12' -0" x 13' -2"BEDROOM 12' -0" x 9' -2"BATH 8' -7" x 8' -3"BATH 10' -9" x 12' -8"BEDROOM 15' -9" x 12' -10"KITCHEN 15' -2" x 8' -0"BALCONY15' -2" x 8' -0"BALCONY WATER HEATER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:40 AMA3 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE A 221570 Author Checker 05/03/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1" = 10'-0"A3 1 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - WALK-UP A (LEVELS 2 &3 SIM) 1" = 10'-0"A3 2 ROOF PLAN - WALK-UP A UNIT PLAN - B2 - 824 SF UNIT PLAN - C7 - 1,385 SF No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 27 of 118 T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY ROOF PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-6" T.O. ROOF DECK EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY ROOF PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-6" T.O. ROOF DECK EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0"+/- 5' - 0"ROOF PARAPET TO SCREEN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TYP.ROOF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING CONDITION APPLIES TO ALL WALK UP UNITS PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:41 AMA4 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE A 221570 Author Checker 05/31/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 BUILDING TYPE A ELEVATION - (FRONT / BACK) BUIDING TYPE A ELEVATION - (SIDES) 1/4" = 1'-0"A4 3 PARAPET SCREENING SECTION - WALK UP No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 28 of 118 A B CDEFG ABC DEG AB CDEFG A BC DEG MANUFACTURED STONE ROCK FACE COLOR: LIGHT GREY EDSTUCCO MEDIUM SAND FINISH COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM DOVE WHITE BA PAINTED METAL TRELLIS COLOR: BRONZECSTUCCO MEDIUM SAND FINISH COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM PALM DESERT TAN STUCCO MEDIUM SAND FINISH COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: SW FOLKSTONE F METAL PANEL COLOR: BRONZE G WINDOW TRIM COLOR: BRONZE PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:43 AMA5 COLORED ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE A 221570 Author Checker 05/04/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING A - COLORED NORTH ELEVAITON RESIDENTIAL BUILDING A - COLORED EAST ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING A - COLORED SOUTH ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING A - COLORED WEST ELEVATION No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 29 of 118 128' - 7" UNIT B4 UNIT B4UNIT B4 UNIT B4 UNIT C3 UNIT C3UNIT C3 UNIT C3 ELEC.UTILITY30' - 3"27' - 6"13' - 1"27' - 6"6' - 10"18' - 11"4' - 6"8' - 2"29' - 7"2' - 10"20' - 3"2' - 10"29' - 7"8' - 2"101' - 5"2' - 10" 1' - 10"5' - 6"8' - 2"5' - 10"ROOF ACCESS ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY HIP ROOF PARAPET TYP. INTERNAL ROOF DRAIN TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE SOLAR SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" 20' -2" x 12' -7"LIVING / DINING 10' -2" x 13' -1"BEDROOM10' -2" x 13' -1"BEDROOM 10' -0" x 14' -8"KITCHEN 6' -2" x 14' -1"BATH 12' -0" x 6' -0"BALCONY WATER HEATER 16' -0" x 8' -0"BALCONY 17' -0" x 17' -9"LIVING / DINING 11' -10" x 14' -5"BEDROOM 8' -3" x 8' -9"BATH 8' -10" x 8' -8"BATH 11' -9" x 11' -11"BEDROOM 12' -7" x 11' -5"KITCHEN WATER HEATER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:47 AMA6 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE B 221570 Author Checker 05/03/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1" = 10'-0"A6 1 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - WALK-UP B (LEVELS 2&3 SIM) 1" = 10'-0"A6 2 ROOF PLAN - WALK-UP B UNIT PLAN - B4 - 865 SF UNIT PLAN - C3 - 1,290 SF No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 30 of 118 ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY ROOF PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY ROOF PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 35'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:47 AMA7 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE B 221570 Author Checker 05/31/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 BUILDING TYPE B ELEVATION - (FRONT / BACK) BUILDING TYPE B ELEVATION - (SIDES) No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 31 of 118 A BC DEG A B DECG A BC DEG A BC DEG MANUFACTURED STONE ROCK FACE COLOR: LIGHT GREY EDSTUCCO MEDIUM SAND FINISH COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM DOVE WHITE BA PAINTED METAL TRELLIS COLOR: BRONZECSTUCCO MEDIUM SAND FINISH COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM PALM DESERT TAN STUCCO MEDIUM SAND FINISH COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: SW FOLKSTONE F METAL PANEL COLOR: BRONZE G WINDOW TRIM COLOR: BRONZE PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:49 AMA8 COLORED ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE B 221570 Author Checker 05/04/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING B - COLORED NORTH ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING B - COLORED WEST ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING B - COLORED EAST ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING B - COLORED SOUTH ELEVATION No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 32 of 118 UNIT B5 UNIT B5UNIT B5 UNIT B5 UNIT C2 UNIT C2 UNIT C2 UNIT C2 UTILITYELEC.144' - 9" 8' - 1"16' - 7"10' - 7"22' - 1"11' - 1"7' - 11"11' - 1"22' - 1"11' - 4"15' - 10"8' - 1"8' - 1"23' - 8"9' - 0"3' - 11"9' - 0"23' - 8"8' - 5"85' - 10"3' - 5" 2' - 0"8' - 1"5' - 9"12' - 2"ROOF ACCESS ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY HIP ROOF PARAPET TYP. INTERNAL ROOF DRAIN TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE SOLAR PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" TRELLIS SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" 22' -6" x 10' -6"LIVING / DINING 9' -6" x 6' -3"BATH 11' -5" x 10' -6"BEDROOM 6' -5" x 11' -7"BATH 11' -3" x 10' -7"BEDROOM 14' -2" x 12' -0"KITCHEN 14' -11" x 10' -5"BALCONY WATER HEATER 13' -10" x 10' -1"BALCONY 14' -2" x 19' -5"LIVING / DINING 11' -6" x 10' -10"BEDROOM 5' -6" x 9' -4"BATH 13' -1" x 11' -3"KITCHEN WATER HEATER PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:54 AMA9 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE C 221570 Author Checker 05/03/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1" = 10'-0"A9 1 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - WALK-UP C (LEVELS 2&3 SIM) 1" = 10'-0"A9 2 ROOF PLAN - WALK-UP C UNIT PLAN - C2 - 1,220 SF UNIT PLAN - B5 - 863 SF No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 33 of 118 ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY ROOF PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY ROOF PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-6"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0"+/- 37' - 0"PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:55 AMA10 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE C 221570 Author Checker 05/31/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 BUILDING TYPE C ELEVATIONS - (FRONT / BACK) BUILDING TYPE C ELEVATIONS - (SIDES) No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 34 of 118 AB CDEGABCDEFG AB CDEFG ABCDE G MANUFACTURED STONE ROCK FACE COLOR: LIGHT GREY EDSTUCCO MEDIUM SAND FINISH COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM DOVE WHITE BA PAINTED METAL TRELLIS COLOR: BRONZECSTUCCO MEDIUM SAND FINISH COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM PALM DESERT TAN STUCCO MEDIUM SAND FINISH COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: SW FOLKSTONE F METAL PANEL COLOR: BRONZE G WINDOW TRIM COLOR: BRONZE PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:56 AMA11 COLORED ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE C 221570 Author Checker 04/07/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022RESIDENTIAL BUILDING C - COLORED EAST ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING C - COLORED NORTH ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING C - COLORED SOUTH ELEVATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING C - COLORED WEST ELEVATION No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 35 of 118 UNIT B2 UNIT B2UNIT B2 UNIT B2 UNIT C7 UNIT C7 UNIT C9 ELEC.ELEC.143' - 1" 7' - 9"17' - 1"7' - 4"21' - 1"29' - 6"21' - 1"11' - 2"4' - 6"16' - 10"4' - 0"35' - 4"21' - 10"14' - 8"11' - 10"6' - 9" 4' - 0"11' - 10"7' - 4"13' - 7"100' - 0"83' - 8"ROOF ACCESS ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY HIP ROOF PARAPET TYP. INTERNAL ROOF DRAIN TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE SOLAR PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0"PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS SOLAR READY AT FLAT ROOF AREAS PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" TRELLIS TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 37'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-6" 10' -0" x 6' -0"BALCONY 13' -7" x 20' -5"LIVING / DINING 11' -2" x 10' -10"BEDROOM 9' -6" x 11' -8"KITCHEN 5' -6" x 9' -4"BATH 14' -5" x 9' -2"BALCONY 18' -6" x 16' -0"LIVING / DINING11' -10" x 13' -4"BED 11' -10" x 9' -2"BATH 14' -9" x 12' -6"KITCHEN 8' -7" x 8' -3"BATH 11' -0" x 12' -8"BED 33' -8" x 26' -0"BALCONY 18' -2" x 26' -2"LIVING / DINING 12' -5" x 12' -5"BED 12' -5" x 9' -8"BATH 13' -11" x 16' -6"KITCHEN 12' -5" x 5' -3"BATH 10' -5" x 12' -8"DEN12' -5" x 12' -8"BED PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:58 AMA12 TYPICAL PLANS - BUILDING TYPE D 221570 Author Checker 05/06/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1" = 10'-0"A12 1 FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 1 - WALK-UP D (LEVELS 2&3 SIM) 1" = 10'-0"A12 2 ROOF PLAN - WALK-UP D UNIT PLAN - B2 - 824 SFUNIT PLAN - C7 - 1,385 SF UNIT PLAN - C9 - 1,850 SF WATER HEATER WATER HEATER WATER HEATER No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 36 of 118 ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:59 AMA13 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE D 221570 Author Checker 05/31/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 BUILDING TYPE D ELEVATIONS - FRONT BUILDING TYPE D ELEVATIONS - LEFT SIDE No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 37 of 118 ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"37' - 0"ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 37'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0"5' - 0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"+/- 37' - 0"PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:49:59 AMA13.1 ELEVATIONS - BUILDING TYPE D 221570 Author Checker 08/01/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 BUILDING TYPE D ELEVATIONS - RIGHT SIDE BUILDING TYPE D ELEVATIONS - BACK No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 38 of 118 ABCDEEFGABCDEFGABCDECGABCDEGMANUFACTURED STONEROCK FACECOLOR: LIGHT GREYEDSTUCCOMEDIUM SAND FINISHCOLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:BM DOVE WHITEBAPAINTED METAL TRELLISCOLOR: BRONZECSTUCCOMEDIUM SAND FINISHCOLOR BASIS OF DESIGN:BM PALM DESERT TAN STUCCOMEDIUM SAND FINISHCOLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: SW FOLKSTONEFMETAL PANELCOLOR: BRONZEGWINDOW TRIMCOLOR: BRONZEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONSKEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of California10/19/2022 1:45:55 PMA14COLORED ELEVATIONS -RESIDENTIAL TYPE D221570AuthorChecker05/06/22Frank Sinatra & PortolaFrank Sinatra &PortolaPalm Desert, CALAND USESUBMITAL06/07/2022RESIDENTIAL BUILDING D - COLORED NORTH ELEVATIONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING D - COLORED SOUTH ELEVATIONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING D - COLORED EAST ELEVAITONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING D - COLORED WEST ELEVATIONNo. Description Date1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/222 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/223 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22Page 39 of 118 RAMP UP ELEC. WATER TRASH PET SPA RA 18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"349' - 4"124' - 0"265' - 6"185' - 0"83' - 10"309' - 0" 24' - 0" PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:00 AMA15 LEVEL P1 - MULTIFAMILY BUILDNG 221570 Author Checker 05/06/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1/16" = 1'-0"A15 1 LOWER LEVEL PARKING - BUILDING TYPE E No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 40 of 118 DOWN TO LVL P1 ENTRY LOUNGE PACKAGE MAIL UNIT D2 UNIT C1 UNIT C8 UNIT B3 UNIT B6 UNIT C6 UNIT B1 UNIT C4UNIT A1 UNIT M1 UNIT D2 UNIT D2 UNIT D2 UNIT M1 UNIT M1 UNIT A1 UNIT A1 UNIT A1 UNIT A1 UNIT M1 UNIT C1UNIT C1 UNIT B3 UNIT B1 UNIT B1 UNIT B3 UNIT C5 UNIT B1 UNIT C4UNIT A1 UNIT B3UNIT B1UNIT B3 4' - 0" 316' - 6" 185' - 5"4' - 0"131' - 0"72' - 0"41' - 9"66' - 9"91' - 9"74' - 2"6' - 10"13' - 0" 6' - 11"13' - 10"8' - 3"2' - 11" 6' - 10"12' - 10"7' - 7"2' - 10" PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:06 AMA16 LEVEL 1 - MULTIFAMILY BULDING 221570 Author Checker 05/04/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1/16" = 1'-0"A16 1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 41 of 118 UNIT D2 UNIT C1 UNIT C8 UNIT B3 UNIT B6 UNIT C6 UNIT B1 UNIT C4UNIT A1 UNIT M1 UNIT D2 UNIT D2 UNIT D2 UNIT M1 UNIT M1 UNIT A1 UNIT A1 UNIT A1 UNIT A1 UNIT M1 UNIT C1UNIT C1 UNIT B3 UNIT B1 UNIT B1 UNIT B3 UNIT C5 UNIT B1 UNIT M1 UNIT M1 UNIT C8 UNIT C1 UNIT C1 UNIT C4UNIT A1 UNIT B3UNIT B1UNIT B3 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:12 AMA17 LEVEL 2 & 3 - MULTIFAMILY BUILDNG 221570 Author Checker 05/06/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1/16" = 1'-0"A17 1 LEVEL 2 & 3 FLOOR PLAN - BUILDING TYPE E No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 42 of 118 16' -4" x 13' -4"KITCHEN 12' -2" x 6' -0"BALCONY 12' -4" x 12' -4"BED 6' -10" x 11' -11"BATH 11' -9" x 13' -7"LIVING 6' -0" x 12' -3"BALCONY 13' -7" x 12' -5"LIVING12' -4" x 11' -5"BED 7' -0" x 12' -10"BATH 11' -7" x 14' -0"KITCHEN 13' -2" x 18' -9"LIVING 13' -4" x 6' -0"BALCONY 6' -4" x 10' -11"BATH 8' -5" x 16' -9"KITCHEN 12' -2" x 6' -0"BALCONY 11' -1" x 16' -0"BED 14' -5" x 18' -5"LIVING / DINING 12' -2" x 14' -9"KITCHEN 9' -8" x 9' -2"BATH 12' -0" x 6' -0"BALCONY 11' -5" x 12' -6"LIVING 15' -4" x 9' -6"KITCHEN 10' -3" x 11' -6"BED 5' -10" x 10' -2"BATH 9' -10" x 12' -1"BATH 13' -8" x 12' -8"LIVING 7' -9" x 10' -5"BATH 11' -10" x 13' -0"BED 12' -0" x 12' -10"BED 10' -0" x 14' -0"KITCHEN 6' -0" x 15' -4"BALCONY PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:15 AMA18 UNIT PLANS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 221570 Author Checker 05/06/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 UNIT PLAN - B1 - 799 SF UNIT PLAN - B3 - 856 SF UNIT PLAN - M1 - 620 SFUNIT PLAN - B6 - 943 SF UNIT PLAN - A1 - 690 SFUNIT PLAN - C1 - 1233 SF No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 43 of 118 16' -2" x 6' -0"BALCONY 21' -4" x 13' -9"LIVING / DINING 14' -9" x 11' -1"KITCHEN 14' -3" x 13' -0"BED 11' -2" x 15' -10"BED 9' -10" x 6' -8"BATH 6' -9" x 13' -3"BATH 12' -2" x 6' -0"BALCONY 10' -6" x 12' -9"BED 13' -0" x 11' -9"LIVING 11' -10" x 11' -0"BED 9' -3" x 18' -0"DEN6' -2" x 13' -9"BATH10' -3" x 13' -9"KITCHEN9' -11" x 11' -2"BATH 11' -2" x 6' -0"BALCONY14' -4" x 20' -2"LIVING / DINING11' -5" x 16' -3"KITCHEN 12' -0" x 11' -6"BED 6' -2" x 13' -8"BATH 7' -3" x 10' -6"BATH 12' -6" x 10' -6"BED 12' -2" x 6' -0"BALCONY 12' -1" x 12' -0"BED 13' -8" x 12' -8"LIVING 11' -10" x 15' -3"BED 10' -8" x 12' -9"KITCHEN 12' -1" x 8' -2"BATH 12' -1" x 7' -7"DEN 7' -8" x 10' -2"BATH 18' -10" x 6' -0"BALCONY 19' -11" x 13' -5"LIVING / DINING12' -7" x 13' -11"BED 12' -7" x 9' -1"BATH 16' -0" x 10' -9"KITCHEN 12' -0" x 11' -0"BATH 12' -0" x 11' -0"BED 12' -11" x 6' -6"BATH PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:19 AMA19 UNIT PLANS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 221570 Author Checker 05/05/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 UNIT PLAN - C8 - 1,427 SF UNIT PLAN - C4 - 1,405 SF UNIT PLAN - C5 - 1,405 SF UNIT PLAN - C6 - 1,396 SFUNIT PLAN - D2 - 1,679 SF No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 44 of 118 T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-6" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-0" T.O. ROOF EL- 31'-6" T.O. PARAPET EL- 36'-4" T.O. OVERRUN EL- 42'-0" ELEVATORT.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-0" MECHANICAL UNIT EXHAUST TYP. T.O. PARAPET EL- 40'-0" T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-6" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-0" T.O. ROOF EL- 31'-6" T.O. PARAPET EL- 36'-4" T.O. OVERRUN EL- 42'-0" ELEVATOR OVERRUNROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY PARAPET ELEVATOR T.O. PARAPET EL- 40'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 36'-4" MECHANICAL UNIT EXHAUST TYP. T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" ELEVATOR OVERRUNROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY PARAPET ROOF TOP MECHANICALS SCREENED BY PARAPET T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-6" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-0" T.O. ROOF EL- 31'-6" T.O. PARAPET EL- 36'-4" T.O. OVERRUN EL- 42'-0" ELEVATOR T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 36'-4" T.O. PARAPET EL- 40'-0" MECHANICAL UNIT EXHAUST TYP. T.O. PARAPET EL- 40'-0" T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-6" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-0" T.O. ROOF EL- 31'-6" T.O. PARAPET EL- 36'-4" T.O. OVERRUN EL- 42'-0" ELEVATOR T.O. PARAPET EL- 33'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 36'-4" MECHANICAL UNIT EXHAUST TYP. T.O. PARAPET EL- 40'-0" PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:20 AMA20 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - MULTIFAMILY 221570 Author Checker 05/31/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 MULTIFAMILY - EAST ELEVATION MULTIFAMILY - NORTH ELEVATION MULTIFAMILY - SOUTH ELEVATION MULTIFAMILY - WEST ELEVATION No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 45 of 118 A CCECDAGB AA A BCG A E DBE B MANUFACTURED STONE ROCK FACE COLOR: LIGHT GREY ESTUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM DOVE WHITE BA STUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: SW FOLKSTONE CSTUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM PALM DESERT TAN G METAL PANEL COLOR: BRONZE H WINDOW TRIM COLOR: BRONZE TRELLIS: WOOD LOOK COMPOSITED PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 12:01:25 PMA21 COLORED ELEVATIONS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 221570 Author Checker 04/07/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022MULTIFAMILY - COLORED NORTH ELEVAITON MULTIFAMILY - COLORED EAST ELEVATION No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 46 of 118 A BCD AEACD D HB DA GCEDC MANUFACTURED STONE ROCK FACE COLOR: LIGHT GREY ESTUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM DOVE WHITE BA STUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: SW FOLKSTONE CSTUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM PALM DESERT TAN G METAL PANEL COLOR: BRONZE H WINDOW TRIM COLOR: BRONZE TRELLIS: WOOD LOOK COMPOSITED PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 12:02:58 PMA22 COLORED ELEVATIONS - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 221570 Author Checker 05/18/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 MULTIFAMILY - COLORED WEST ELEVATION MULTIFAMILY -COLORED SOUTH ELEVATION No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 47 of 118 OPEN ROOF MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE OPEN ROOF MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE ELEVATOR OVERRUN ROOF HATCH INTERNAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM OPEN TRELLIS ABOVE BALCONIES BELOW OPEN TRELLIS ABOVE BALCONIES BELOW OPEN TRELLIS ABOVE BALCONIES BELOW INTERNAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 42'-0" CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE SOLAR CONDUIT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE SOLAR PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4" PARAPET HEIGHT 40'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 40'-0" ROOF HEIGHT 31'-6" PARAPET HEIGHT 39'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0" TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0" TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0" TYP. PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4" PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4"PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 36'-4" PARAPET HEIGHT 33'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 40'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 40'-0"PARAPET HEIGHT 40'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 40'-0"PARAPET HEIGHT 40'-0" PARAPET HEIGHT 40'-0" DOG HOUSE TO SCREEN MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TYP. -STUCCO CLADDING ROOF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT +/- 8'-6"PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:22 AMA23 ROOF PLAN - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 221570 Author Checker 05/04/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1/16" = 1'-0"A23 1 ROOF PLAN - MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 1/4" = 1'-0"A23 2 PARAPET SCREENING SECTION - MULTIFAMILY No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 48 of 118 SWIMMING POOL W A LK-U P M AIL / PA CKA G ELEA SIN G LO U N G EMECHANICAL CABANASGAME SIMULATOR CO-WORKING SPACE GAME ROOM MENS MENS PRIVATE TERRACEPRIVATE TERRACEPRIVATE TERRACEW O RK RO O M O PEN O FFICEO FFICEO FFICEM ECH .W CEN TRY /CO N CIERG ECANOPY OVERHEAD STO RFIRE TRUCK ACCESS PATH V I S I T OR P A R K I N G FIRE TRUCK ACCESS PATH SPA PACKA G E RO O M WOMENS WOMENS OUTDOOR SHOWERSEXTERIOR SCREENING LOUNGE SEATINGCLUB RO O M LO U N G EENTERTAINMENT SUITE ENTERTAINMENT SUITE THEATER MAINTAINENCE POOL EQUIPMENT SLO PEINTERNAL DRAIN TYP.SLO PECANOPY CANOPY MECHANICAL BELOW CANOPY PARAPET HEIGHT 18'-6" ROOF HATCH PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:26 AMA24 CLUB HOUSE BUILDING & POOL TERRACE PLAN 221570 Author Checker 04/07/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1/16" = 1'-0"A24 1 FLOOR PLAN - CLUB HOUSE & POOL TERRACE 1/16" = 1'-0"A24 2 ROOF PLAN - CLUB HOUSE No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 49 of 118 T.O. LEVEL EL- 0'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 18'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 27'-0" T.O. ROOF DECK EL- 15'-0" OUTDOOR MECHANICAL SCREENING SYSTEM T.O. LEVEL EL- 0'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 18'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 27'-0" T.O. ROOF DECK EL- 15'-6" OUTDOOR MECHANICAL SCREENING SYSTEM T.O. LEVEL EL- 0'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 18'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 27'-0" T.O. ROOF DECK EL- 15'-6" T.O. LEVEL EL- 0'-0" T.O. PARAPET EL- 18'-6" T.O. ROOF EL- 27'-0" T.O. ROOF DECK EL- 15'-6" PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:28 AMA25 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - CLUBHOUSE 221570 Author Checker 05/31/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 CLUBHOUSE - SOUTH ELEVATION CLUBHOUSE - WEST ELEVATION CLUBHOUSE - NORTHEAST ELEVATION CLUBHOUSE - NORTH ELEVATION No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 50 of 118 ABC D ABCD ABCD MANUFACTURED STONE TEXTURE: ROCKFACE COLOR: LIGHT GREY BSTUCCO BASIS OF DESIGN COLOR: BM SAND DOLLAR A METAL ACCENTS PAINTED COLOR: BRONZE TRELLIS INFILL SLATS: WOOD LOOK COMPOSITE C WINDOW TRIM COLOR: BRONZED PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:30 AMA26 COLORED ELEVATIONS - CLUBHOUSE 221570 Author Checker 04/07/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 CLUBHOUSE - NORTH CLUBHOUSE - NORHTWEST CLUBHOUSE - NORTHEAST No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 51 of 118 A B CD AB CD A B C D MANUFACTURED STONE TEXTURE: ROCKFACE COLOR: LIGHT GREY BSTUCCO BASIS OF DESIGN COLOR: BM SAND DOLLAR A METAL ACCENTS PAINTED COLOR: BRONZE TRELLIS INFILL SLATS: WOOD LOOK COMPOSITE C WINDOW TRIM COLOR: BRONZED PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:31 AMA27 COLORED ELEVATIONS - CLUBHOUSE 221570 Author Checker 05/23/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 CLUBHOUSE - SOUTH CLUBHOUSE - WEST CLUBHOUSE-SOUTHEAST No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 52 of 118 UP Screened Mechanical Area ELEVATED POOL DECK (+4') RAMP UP Elec/IDF LockersTowels Mech Storage JAN ENTRY (+4') 30' -6" x 33' -7"WEIGHT / STRETCHING 10' -1" x 12' -8"POOL EQUIPMENT 65' -0" x 36' -6"POOL 37' -6" x 48' -4"YOGA / MEDITATION LAWN ELEV. OVER RUN SLOPEPARAPET HEIGHT - 33'-0" INTERNAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHADE CANOPY BELOW 17' -7" x 22' -11"GROUP FITNESS 48' -2" x 29' -10"CARDIO OPEN TO BELOW PARAPET HEIGHT - 10'-0" PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:35 AMA28 FITNESS BUILDING & TERRACE 221570 Author Checker 04/07/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1/8" = 1'-0"A28 1 BUILDING PLAN - FITNESS LEVEL 1 1/8" = 1'-0"A28 3 ROOF PLAN - FITNESS 1/8" = 1'-0"A28 2 BUILDING PLAN - FITNESS LEVEL 2 No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 53 of 118 T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 4'-0" T.O. OVERRUN EL- 33'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 19'-6" T.O. GRADE EL- 0'-0" ELEVATOR OVERRUN T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 4'-0" T.O. OVERRUN EL- 33'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 19'-6" T.O. GRADE EL- 0'-0" ELEVATOR OVERRUN T.O. ROOF EL- 30'-6" T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 4'-0" T.O. OVERRUN EL- 33'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 19'-6" T.O. GRADE EL- 0'-0" ELEVATOR OVERRUN T.O. ROOF 30'-6" T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 4'-0" T.O. OVERRUN EL- 33'-0" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 19'-6" T.O. GRADE EL- 0'-0" ELEVATOR OVERRUN T.O. ROOF EL- 30'-6" PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:35 AMA30 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - FITNESS 221570 Author Checker 06/03/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 FITNESS - NORTH ELEVATION FITNESS - SOUTH ELEVATION FITNESS - WEST ELEVATION FITNESS - EAST ELEVATION. No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 54 of 118 A B DE BC D A E BD C A BABE PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:35 AMA31 COLORED ELEVATIONS - FITNESS 221570 Author Checker 04/07/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 FITNESS - WEST ELEVATION FITNESS - SOUTH ELEVATION FITNESS - NORTH ELEVATION FITNESS - EAST ELEVATION STUCCO BASIS OF DESIGN COLOR: BM SAND DOLLAR B ALUMINUM ACCENTS COLOR: BRONZED MANUFACTURED STONE TEXTURE: ROCKFACE COLOR: LIGHT GREY C STUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM WAYNESBORO TAUPEA METAL PANEL COLOR 1:DARK BRONZEE No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 55 of 118 1 :3 FRANK SINATRA DRIVEADJACENT PROPERTY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 6' OPAQUE WALL L E V E L 3 S I G H T L I N E L E V E L 2 S I G H T L I N E 33' - 6"13' - 0"41' - 1"34' - 7"17' - 4"34' - 6"41' - 6" 199' - 0"3.3°LOT 12279.9 FT BUILDING 2278.1 FT10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"1 :3 PORTOLA AVENUEADJACENT PROPERTY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 6' OPAQUE WALL 33' - 6"28.5 - 30.5 FTL E V E L 3 S I G H T L I N E L E V E L 2 S I G H T L I N E 24' - 1"41' - 6"2' - 1"55' - 0"34' - 2" 229' - 11"2.8°BUILDING 8274.9 FT10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"LOT 19272.2 FT 12' - 0"12' - 0"PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:37 AMA32 SITE SECTIONS 221570 Author Checker 05/06/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1/8" = 1'-0"A32 1 STREET SECTION THROUGH FRANK SINATRA DRIVE 1/8" = 1'-0"A32 2 STREET SECTION THROUGH PORTOLA AVE No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 56 of 118 20' - 6"VARIES 10' - 6" TYP.7' - 0"11' - 8"1' - 8"10' - 0"12' - 10"11' - 8"10' - 9"0.5 12 STUCCO COLOR: BOD BM DOVE WHITE METAL COPING: COLOR: BRONZE MANUFACTURED STONE WALL 12' - 10"PRECAST CAP VARIES 19' - 0"METAL ROOF10' - 0" CLEAR19' - 0"11' - 4"10' - 0" CLEARVARIES 24' - 0"11' - 7"3' - 6"5' - 0"8' - 0"STUCCO COLOR: BOD BM DOVE WHITE TRELLIS ABOVE9' - 4"TRELLIS ABOVE STUCCO BOD: BM DOVE WHITE PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:38 AMA33 GARAGE, CARPORT, & TRASH ENCLOSURE PLANS 221570 Author Checker 05/03/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1/4" = 1'-0"A33 1 GARAGE PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A33 2 GARAGE FRONT 1/4" = 1'-0"A33 3 GARAGE SIDES 1/4" = 1'-0"A33 4 CAR PORT PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A33 5 CAR PORT SIDE 1/4" = 1'-0"A33 6 CAR PORT FRONT 1/4" = 1'-0"A33 7 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"A33 8 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE 1/4" = 1'-0"A33 9 TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 57 of 118 6' - 0"18' - 0" MANUFACTURED STONE ROCK FACE COLOR: LIGHT GREY STUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN" BM DOVE WHITE 8"1' - 9"2' - 8"2' - 2"11' - 8"2' - 0"53°67.5.6' - 0"5' - 11" MANUFACTURED STONE ROCK FACE COLOR: LIGHT GREY STUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN" BM DOVE WHITE 8"1' - 4"3' - 9"4"77.5°6' - 0"3' - 8"6' - 0"3' - 8" 30' - 0" TYP. SCPACING 4' - 0"2' - 0"6' - 0"CMU PLASTER BLOCK WALL COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM PALM DESERT TAN WROUGHT IORN METAL PICKET COLOR: BLACK 2' - 0" TYP. PRECAST COLUMN CAP 6' - 0"WROUGHT IORN METAL PICKET COLOR: BLACK PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:38 AMA34 SITE SIGNAGE & FENCE SECTION ELEVATIONS 221570 Author Checker 06/01/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 3/4" = 1'-0"A34 1 MONUMENT SIGN @ PORTOLA & FRANK SINATRA - FRONT 3/4" = 1'-0"A34 2 MONUMENT SIGN @ PORTOLA ENTRY - FRONT 3/4" = 1'-0"A34 3 MONUMENT SIGN @ PORTOLA & FRANK SINATRA - SIDE 3/4" = 1'-0"A34 4 MONUMENT SIGN @ PORTOLA ENTRY - SIDE 1/2" = 1'-0"A34 5 STREET PERIMITER FENCE SECTION ELEVATION #1 1/2" = 1'-0"A34 6 FULL PICKET PERIMETER FENCE SECTION ELEVAITON #2 No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 58 of 118 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCE 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCESECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCE SECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCE SECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCE SECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCE SECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCE SECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCESECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCESECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCESECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCE SECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCE SECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCE SECTION 6' HIGH FULL PICKET FENCE SECTION NOTE: UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE TYPICAL FENCE DESIGN INCLUDES 4'-0" HIGH PLASTER/STUCCO WALL W/ 2'-0" METAL PICKETS ABOVE. SEE A34 FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 12:27:15 PMA34.1 SITE FENCE LAYOUT 221570 Author Checker 10/19/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 No. Description Date 1" = 30'-0"A34.1 1 SITE FENCE LAYOUT DIAGRAM Page 59 of 118 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:38 AMA35 MATERIAL BOARD 221570 Author Checker 05/05/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 MANUFACTURED STONE COLOR: LIGHT GREY STONE DIMENSIONS 9"x18" STUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM DOVE WHITE METAL PANEL & ACCENTS COLOR: ANODIZED BRONZE STUCCO COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN: BM PALM DESERT TAN STUCCO BASIS OF DESIGN COLOR: BM SAND DOLLAR METAL PANEL: COLOR: DARK BRONZE PAINTED METAL TRELLIS COLOR: BRONZE WINDOW TRIM COLOR: BRONZESTUCCO BASIS OF DESIGN COLOR: SW FOLKSTONE No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 60 of 118 4"4" FILL CAVITY WITH BATT INSULATION -TYPICAL FLEXILE FALSHING BACK WRAP AROUND WOOD HEADER AND SEAL 5/8" GYP BOARD STUCCO -SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR FINISH AND COLOR 18 GA PREFINISHED SHEET METAL HEADER TRIM WITH 18 GA DROP LEG CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT BETWEEN PREFIN METAL FLASHING AND WALL -JAMBS AND HEAD ONLY NO SEALANT AT FLASHING TO ALLOW FOR DRAINAGE MEMBRANE FLASHING LAP OVER METAL FLASHING -EXTEND BEYOND OUTER EDGES OF JAMB AND BEYOND ANY TRIM AIR BARRIER LAP OVER FLEXIBLE FLASHING AND SEAL BUILDING PAPER CONTINUOUS OVER AIR BARRIER METAL PANEL -SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR COLOR FILL CAVITY WITH BATT INSULATION -TYPICAL FLEXILE FALSHING BACK WRAP AROUND WOOD HEADER AND SEAL 5/8" GYP BOARD CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT BETWEEN PREFIN METAL FLASHING AND WALL -JAMBS AND HEAD ONLY 2-2X LEDGERS CONTINUOUS AT FURRING WALL -NOTCH OUT FURRING WALL STUDS AND ATTACH LEDGERS TO FURRING WALL PANEL, THEN INSTALL FURRING WALL AND LEDGER ASSEMBLY TO STRUCTURAL WALL STUDS 8" CONTINUOUS FLASHING STUCCO -SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR FINISH AND COLOR AIR BARRIER LAP OVER FLEXIBLE FLASHING AND SEAL BUILDING PAPER CONTINUOUS OVER AIR BARRIER STUCCO SOFFT FILL CAVITY WITH BATT INSULATION -TYPICAL FLEXILE FALSHING BACK WRAP AROUND WOOD HEADER AND SEAL 5/8" GYP BOARD CONTINUOUS BEAD OF SEALANT BETWEEN PREFIN METAL FLASHING AND WALL -JAMBS AND HEAD ONLY STUCCO -SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR FINISH AND COLOR AIR BARRIER LAP OVER FLEXIBLE FLASHING AND SEAL BUILDING PAPER CONTINUOUS OVER AIR BARRIER 10" 2-2X LEDGERS CONTINUOUS AT FURRING WALL -NOTCH OUT FURRING WALL STUDS AND ATTACH LEDGERS TO FURRING WALL PANEL, THEN INSTALL FURRING WALL AND LEDGER ASSEMBLY TO STRUCTURAL WALL STUDS CONTINUOUS FLASHING STUCCO SOFFT 3 A51 2 A51 4 A51 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"A51 6 A51 6 A51 6 T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"A51 5 A51 7 T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0" 6"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. ROOF EL- 32'-0" PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:40 AMA51 MISC DETAILS 221570 Author Checker 07/29/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 3" = 1'-0"A51 6 DETAIL @ EXTRUDED METAL TRIM 3" = 1'-0"A51 5 DETAIL @ RECESSED WINDOW 8" 3" = 1'-0"A51 7 DETAIL @ RECESSED WINDOW 10" 3" = 1'-0"A51 1 TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL WALK UP FACADE WINDOW CONDITIONS 1/2" = 1'-0"A51 3 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 2 1/2" = 1'-0"A51 2 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A51 4 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 3 No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 76 of 118 4 A52 2 A52 3 A52 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"A51 6 A51 6 A51 6 T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 36'-4"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"A52 5 T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 36'-4"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"T.O. LEVEL 1 EL- 0'-0" T.O. LEVEL 3 EL- 21'-4" T.O. LEVEL 2 EL- 10'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL- 36'-4" FILL CAVITY WITH BATT INSULATION -TYPICAL FLEXILE FALSHING BACK WRAP AROUND WOOD HEADER AND SEAL 5/8" GYP BOARD STUCCO -SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR FINISH AND COLOR AIR BARRIER LAP OVER FLEXIBLE FLASHING AND SEAL BUILDING PAPER CONTINUOUS OVER AIR BARRIER 2-2X LEDGERS CONTINUOUS AT FURRING WALL -NOTCH OUT FURRING WALL STUDS AND ATTACH LEDGERS TO FURRING WALL PANEL, THEN INSTALL FURRING WALL AND LEDGER ASSEMBLY TO STRUCTURAL WALL STUDS 10" PREFINISHED SHEET METAL DRIP FLAHSING COLOR: TO MATCH WINDOW TRIM PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 12:06:39 PMA52 MISC DETAILS 221570 Author Checker 10/03/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A52 1 RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY FACADE WINDOW CONDITIONS 1/2" = 1'-0"A52 2 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 2 Copy 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A52 3 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 1 Copy 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A52 4 TYPICAL WALL SECTION 3 Copy 1 3" = 1'-0"A52 5 DETAIL @ RECESSED WINDOW 10" MULTI No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 77 of 118 WDFRIG DW WD FRIG DW WDFRIG DW W D FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIGFRIG FRIGFRIG FRIG DW FRIG DW 1. APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS A. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS B. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS C. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS D. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS E. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS F. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE G. 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE H. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE BUILDING CODE REQUIRMENTS T.D. 170'-0" T.D. 185'-6" UNIT B2 UNIT B2 UNIT B2 UNIT B2 AREA PER LEVEL: 10,752 SQFT/LEVEL * 3 LEVELS = 32,256 SQFT UNIT C7 UNIT C7 UNIT C7 UNIT C7 EXIT SEPERATION47' - 1"UNIT B4 T.D. 133'-0" UNIT B4 UNIT B4 UNIT B4 UNIT C3 UNIT C3 UNIT C3 UNIT C3 T.D. 156'-0" AREA PER LEVEL: 10,833 SQFT/LEVEL * 3 LEVELS = 32,499 SQFTEXIT SEPERATION56' - 3"ELECUTILITYALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE 60' HEIGHT HEIGHT PROVIDED 37' HEIGHT TABLE 504.4, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE 3 STORIES STORIES PROVIDED 3 STORIES TABLE 506.2, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R At= 7,000 SQFT PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2 Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa Aa = {7,000 + [7,000 x 0.75] x 3 Aa= 36,750 SQFT (12,250 SQFT/STORY) SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS AN NFPA 13R IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC SECTION 903.3.1 CODE CONSIDERATIONS - BUILDING TYPE A,B,C,D BUILDING CLASSIFICATION: Dwelling units and related spaces R-2 (Primary Occupation Class) Construction Types: Type VB PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:43 AMA53 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCUALTIONS - TYPE A, B BUILDINGS 221570 Author Checker 05/06/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 3/32" = 1'-0"A53 1 BUILDING TYPE A - LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"A53 2 BUILDING TYPE B - LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 78 of 118 FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW WDFRIG DW WD FRIG DWWDFRIG DW W D WDFRIG DW W D FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIG DW FRIGDWW D 1. APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS A. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS B. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS C. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS D. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS E. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS F. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE G. 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE H. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE BUILDING CODE REQUIRMENTS ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE 60' HEIGHT HEIGHT PROVIDED 37' HEIGHT TABLE 504.4, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE 3 STORIES STORIES PROVIDED 3 STORIES TABLE 506.2, TYPE VB, GROUP R2, NFPA 13R At= 7,000 SQFT PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2 Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa Aa = {7,000 + [7,000 x 0.75] x 3 Aa= 36,750 SQFT (12,250 SQFT/STORY) SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS AN NFPA 13R IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC SECTION 903.3.1 CODE CONSIDERATIONS - BUILDING TYPE A,B,C,D BUILDING CLASSIFICATION: Dwelling units and related spaces R-2 (Primary Occupation Class) Construction Types: Type VB T.D. 181'-6" UNIT B5 AREA PER LEVEL: 10,300 SQFT/LEVEL * 3 LEVELS = 30,900 SQFT UNIT B5 UNIT B5 UNIT B5 UNIT C2 UNIT C2UNIT C2 UNIT C2 T.D. 172'-9"MIN 35.5'EXIT SEPERATION 48' - 9"UNIT B2 T.D. 196'-0" UNIT B2 UNIT B2 UNIT B2 UNIT C7 UNIT C7 UNIT C9 T.D. 172'-0" AREA PER LEVEL: 9,819 SQFT/LEVEL * 3 LEVELS = 29,457 SQFT T.D. 170'-0"EXIT SEPERATION47' - 5"PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:47 AMA54 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCULATIONS - TYPE C, D BUILDINGS 221570 Author Checker 05/31/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 3/32" = 1'-0"A54 1 BUILDING TYPE C - LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"A54 2 BUILDING TYPE D - LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 79 of 118 DWDWDWWDDW WDWD WDWDDW DWDWDW DW1. APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS A. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS B. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS C. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS D. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS E. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS F. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE G. 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE H. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE BUILDING CODE REQUIRMENTS ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA ABOVE GRADE LEVELS: ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE VA, GROUP R2, NFPA 13 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE 70' HEIGHT HEIGHT PROVIDED 42' HEIGHT TABLE 504.4, TYPE VA, GROUP R2, NFPA 13 ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE 4 STORIES STORIES PROVIDED 3 STORIES TABLE 506.2, TYPE VA, GROUP R2, NFPA R13 At= 36,000 SQFT PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2 Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa Aa = {36,000 + [12,000 x 0.75] x 3 Aa= 135,000 SQFT (45,000 SQFT/STORY) BELOW GRADE LEVEL: ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE I-A, GROUP S2, NFPA 13 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE UNLIMITED HEIGHT HEIGHT PROVIDED 11' HEIGHT TABLE 504.4, TYPE I-A GROUP S2, NFPA 13 ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE UNLIMITED TABLE 506.2, TYPE I-A, GROUP S2, NFPA R13 At= UNLIMITED PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2 Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa Aa= UNLIMITED AREA CALCULATIONS - BUILDING TYPE E BUILDING CLASSIFICATION: Dwelling units and related spaces R-2 (Primary Occupation Class) Amenity Spaces less than 50 Occupants B if 50 occupants or more A-3 Parking S-2 Construction Types: Type I-A Level P1 Type VA Level 1-3 SPECIAL PROVISIONS: Section 510.2 - Horizontal building separation allowance Section 510.2 allows the basement and upper levels to be considered separate and distinct buildings for the purpose of determining area and height limitations, provided: a) The Level P1 Parking Garage is of Type I-A construction and is separated from the building above with a horizontal assembly having a minimum of 3 hour fire-resistance rating. b) Shafts and stairway enclosures shall be 2 hour rated. The horizontal separation occurs at the Level 1 floor line. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level P1PARKING S2 (TYPE 1-A)3-HR SEPARATION RESIDENTIAL R2 (TYPE VA) RESIDENTIAL R2 (TYPE VA) RESIDENTIAL R2 (TYPE VA) DIGRAMATIC BUILDING SECTION VA AREA PER LEVEL 1: 41,966 SQFT/LEVEL IA AREA PER LEVEL 1: 2,395 SQFT/LEVEL 3HR SEPERATIONC.P. 112'T.D. 186'T.D. 124'T.D. 101'T.D. 172'VA AREA PER LEVEL 2 & 3: 44,361 SQFT/LEVELC.P. 112'T.D. 147'50' - 0" DEAD ENDT.D. 115'T.D. 109'43' - 3" DEAD ENDT.D. 178'C.P. 78'DEAD END15' - 5"IA AREA PER LEVEL P1: 58,827 SQFT/LEVEL RAMP UP TO LEVEL 1 EXIT SEPERATION 305' - 2"1/3 = 155' - 6"466' - 5"PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:50:57 AMA55 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCUALTIONS - TYPE E BUILDING 221570 Author Checker 05/08/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 1/32" = 1'-0"A55 1 BUILDING TYPE D - LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0"A55 2 SECOND LEVEL CODE PLAN 1/32" = 1'-0"A55 3 ARC - CODE PLAN TYPE D LEVEL P1 No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 80 of 118 UP 1. APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS A. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS B. 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS C. 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS D. 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS E. 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND ITS APPENDICES AND STANDARDS F. 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE G. 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE H. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE BUILDING CODE REQUIRMENTS CLUB ROOM CLUB ROOM ENT. SUITE ENT. SUITE COWORKING LOBBY/LOUNGE LEASING THEATER POOL EQP. MAINTENANCE SCREENED MECH. GAMES/SPEAK EASY PACKAGE LEVEL 1 AREA: 17,311 SQFT WEIGHTS/STRETCHING POOL EQP ELEC/IDF EXTERIOR POOL EXTERIOR POOL TERRACE (+4') EXTERIOR YOGA/GOUP FITNESS LAWN LEVEL 1 AREA: 2,553 SQFT EXTERIOR ENTRY TERRACE (+4')GROUP FITNESS CARDIO EQP. LEVEL 2 AREA: 2049 SQFT ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE 60' HEIGHT HEIGHT PROVIDED 27' HEIGHT TABLE 504.4, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13 ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE 2 STORIES STORIES PROVIDED 1 STORY TABLE 506.2, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13 At= 18,000 SQFT(PER STORY) PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2 Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa Aa = {18,000 + [18,000 x 0.75] x 1 Aa= 31,500 SQFT ACTUAL BUILDING AREA: 17,311 SQFT CODE CONSIDERATIONS - BUILDING TYPE F BUILDING CLASSIFICATION: A-3 (Primary Occupation Class) Amenity Spaces less than 50 Occupants B if 50 occupants or more A-3 Construction Types: Type VB ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA ACCORDING TO TABLE 504.3, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE 60' HEIGHT HEIGHT PROVIDED 33' HEIGHT TABLE 504.4, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13 ALLOWABLE STORIES ABOVE GRADE 2 STORIES STORIES PROVIDED 2 STORIES TABLE 506.2, TYPE VB, GROUP A3, NFPA 13 At= 18,000 SQFT(PER STORY) PER SECTION 506.2 EQUATION 5-2 Aa= {At + [NS x lf] x Sa Aa = {18,000 + [18,000 x 0.75] x 2 Aa= 63,000 SQFT ACTUAL BUILDING AREA: 4,602 SQFT CODE CONSIDERATIONS - BUILDING TYPE G BUILDING CLASSIFICATION: Dwelling units and related spaces A-3 (Primary Occupation Class) Amenity Spaces less than 50 Occupants B if 50 occupants or more A-3 Construction Types: Type VB PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/19/2022 11:51:00 AMA56 PRELIMINARY CODE & AREA CALCUALTIONS - TYPE F & G BUILDINGS 221570 Author Checker 05/08/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 3/32" = 1'-0"A56 2 BUILDING TYPE E - LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"A56 3 BUILDING TYPE F - LEVEL 1 CODE PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"A56 4 BUILDING F LEVEL 2 CODE PLAN No. Description Date 1 REVISED SUBMITTAL 8/1/22 2 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/3/22 3 REVISED SUBMITTAL 10/19/22 Page 81 of 118 PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS KEY PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of California 10/3/2022 3:14:56 PMA1-ALT PROJECT METRICS 221570 Author Checker 10/03/22 Frank Sinatra & Portola Frank Sinatra & Portola Palm Desert, CA LAND USE SUBMITAL 06/07/2022 No. Description Date Unit Type Count %BED Studio 16 4%16 Alcove 19 5%19 1 Bedroom 176 45%176 2 Bedroom 171 43%342 3 Bedroom 12 3%36 Total Units 589394 Building Unit Type Unit Count/Building Total Unit Count Unit Area Total Area E M1 16 16 620 9,920 E A1 19 19 690 13,110 E B1 15 15 799 11,985 A B2 12 60 824 - D B2 12 12 824 59,328 E B3 14 14 856 11,984 B B4 12 36 865 31,140 C B5 12 36 863 31,068 E B6 3 3 943 2,829 E C1 13 13 1,233 16,029 C C2 12 36 1,220 43,920 B C3 12 36 1,290 46,440 E C4 6 6 1,405 8,430 E C5 3 3 1,405 4,215 E C6 3 3 1,396 4,188 A C7 12 60 1,385 - D C7 6 6 1,385 91,410 E C8 5 5 1,427 7,135 D C9 3 3 1,850 5,550 E D2 12 12 1,679 20,148 394 418,829 Residential Building Totals UNITS Site Metrics Area (GSF)Dus/Building Total Parking # Buildings Level P1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total/Building Total Area Standard Carport Garage Underground Site 263 256 140 Building A 5 Circulation (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 8,836 8,836 8,836 24 120 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)750 750 750 10,724 10,724 10,724 32,172 160,860 Building B 3 Circulation (Exterior)1,471 1,471 1,471 Residential 8,620 8,620 8,620 24 72 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)742 742 742 10,833 10,833 10,833 32,499 97,497 Building C 3 Common (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 8,332 8,332 8,332 24 72 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)830 830 830 10,300 10,300 10,300 30,900 92,700 Building D 1 Circulation (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 7,917 7,917 7,917 21 21 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)750 750 750 9,805 9,805 9,805 29,415 29,415 Building E (Multifamily)1 Common Circulation 2,931 8,247 5,937 5,937 Residential 33,125 38,424 38,424 109 109 Amenity 407 2,989 Parking 55,507 157 Total (Interior)58,845 44,361 44,361 44,361 191,928 191,928 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)3,302 3,302 3,302 Building F (Clubhouse)1 17,311 17,311 17,311 Building G (Fitness)1 2,553 2,049 4,602 4,602 15 594,313 394 816 2.07 Total Stalls Parking Ratio Site Metrics Area (GSF)Dus/Building Total Parking # Buildings Level P1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total/Building Total Area Standard Carport Garage Underground Site 179 183 152 Building A 5 Circulation (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 8,836 8,836 8,836 24 120 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)750 750 750 10,724 10,724 10,724 32,172 160,860 Building B 3 Circulation (Exterior)1,471 1,471 1,471 Residential 8,620 8,620 8,620 24 72 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)742 742 742 10,833 10,833 10,833 32,499 97,497 Building C 3 Common (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 8,332 8,332 8,332 24 72 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)830 830 830 10,300 10,300 10,300 30,900 92,700 Building D 1 Circulation (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 7,917 7,917 7,917 21 21 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)750 750 750 9,805 9,805 9,805 29,415 29,415 Building E (Multifamily)1 Common Circulation 2,931 8,247 5,937 5,937 Residential 33,125 38,424 38,424 109 109 Amenity 407 2,989 Parking 55,507 157 Total (Interior)58,845 44,361 44,361 44,361 191,928 191,928 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)3,302 3,302 3,302 Building F (Clubhouse)1 17,311 17,311 17,311 Building G (Fitness)1 2,553 2,049 4,602 4,602 15 594,313 394 671 1.70 Total Stalls Parking Ratio Site Metrics Area (GSF)Dus/Building Total Parking # Buildings Level P1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total/Building Total Area Standard Carport Garage Underground Site 180 183 152 Building A 5 Circulation (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 8,836 8,836 8,836 24 120 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)750 750 750 10,724 10,724 10,724 32,172 160,860 Building B 3 Circulation (Exterior)1,471 1,471 1,471 Residential 8,620 8,620 8,620 24 72 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)742 742 742 10,833 10,833 10,833 32,499 97,497 Building C 3 Common (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 8,332 8,332 8,332 24 72 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)830 830 830 10,300 10,300 10,300 30,900 92,700 Building D 1 Circulation (Exterior)1,138 1,138 1,138 Residential 7,917 7,917 7,917 21 21 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)750 750 750 9,805 9,805 9,805 29,415 29,415 Building E (Multifamily)1 Common Circulation 2,931 8,247 5,937 5,937 Residential 33,125 38,424 38,424 109 109 Amenity 407 2,989 Parking 55,507 157 Total (Interior)58,845 44,361 44,361 44,361 191,928 191,928 Balcony/Patio (Exterior)3,302 3,302 3,302 Building F (Clubhouse)1 17,311 17,311 17,311 Building G (Fitness)1 2,553 2,049 4,602 4,602 15 594,313 394 672 1.71 Total Stalls Parking Ratio Page 82 of 118 NOPARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKING FRANK SINATRA DRIVE PROP. BUILDING 1TYPE "C"10,300 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,300 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,300 SF (3RD FLOOR)30,900 SF (TOTAL)EX. C/L PROP. BUILDING 2TYPE "C"10,300 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,300 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,300 SF (3RD FLOOR)30,900 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 3TYPE "C"10,300 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,300 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,300 SF (3RD FLOOR)30,900 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 4TYPE "B"10,833 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,833 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,833 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,499 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 5TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 6TYPE "B"10,833 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,833 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,833 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,499 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 7TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 8TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 9TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 10TYPE "B"10,833 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,833 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,833 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,499 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 11TYPE "D"9,819 SF (1ST FLOOR)9,819 SF (2ND FLOOR)9,819 SF (3RD FLOOR)29,457 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 12TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 13TYPE "E"44,361 SF (1ST FLOOR)44,361 SF (2ND FLOOR)44,361 SF (3RD FLOOR)133,083 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 14LEASING / CLUBHOUSE17,311 SFPROP.BUILDING 15FITNESS2,553 SF (1ST FLR)2,049 SF (2ND FLR)4,602 SF (TOTAL)32.8'43.7'45.1'42.8'31.4'33.2'34.5' 17.8'20.5'30.5'20.5'16.2'18'30'18'PoolDog Park /RetentionSpaYogaLawnPool2 1 . 8 ' 1 8 ' 3 2 ' EX. CURB & GUTTER 11.5' 22.8' 63' 20' 32.6' 46.3' 10.9'18' 13.9'55.6'309.6'17'20.5'74.1'14.9'20.5'45.1 '23.6'30.6'24'10'24'29.1'PRO P . E N T R Y KIOS K 16'18'30.5'20.5'EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY& LOT LINE (TYP.)30'30' 18'20.4'18'30'20.5'26.9'23' 23' 20' 26'30'20.5'26.4'18' 30' 18' 22.8 ' 24'EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY& LOT LINE (TYP.)EX. C/L (TYP.)PROP. SIGNAGEPROP. PROJECT BOUNDARY& R/W (TYP.)EX. C/L (TYP.)29'29'PORTOLA AVENUEN 27°46'33" E 840.48'N 01°21'56" E 1923.00'N 89°52'08" E 686.08'N 04°19'04" E 58.45'=23°27'29" R=1937.00' L=793.05'=11°29'14" R=1863.00' L=373.51'N 47°57'11" W29.27'75'117.2' 59.4'21.6'21.6'21.6'18'23.1' 9' TYP. 18' 29.4' 30' 20.5' 39.8'68.1'19.5'20.5'30'20.5'21.9'22'18'18'21.4'15.2' 18' 30'81.2'60.3'20.5'10'PROP. LANDSCAPEPARKWAY (TYP.)10'PROP. LANDSCAPEPARKWAY (TYP.)PROP. LANDSCAPEPARKWAY (TYP.)10'EX. PROPERTIES TO BE MERGEDWITH FINAL DESIGN PLANSPROP. PROPERTY FENCE PER LANDSCAPE &ARCHITECTURE PLANS (TYP.)PROP. PROPERTY FENCE PER LANDSCAPE &ARCHITECTURE PLANS (TYP.)24' WIDE “ALL-WEATHER SURFACE” MADEUP OF A COMBINATION OF CONCRETE &TURF BLOCK ABLE TO WITHSTAND A FULLYLOADED FIRE VEHICLE TO THE SATISFACTIONAND APPROVAL OF THE FIRE MARSHALL18'24' WIDE “ALL-WEATHER SURFACE” MADE UP OF A COMBINATIONOF CONCRETE & TURF BLOCK ABLE TO WITHSTAND A FULLY LOADEDFIRE VEHICLE TO THE SATISFACTION AND APPROVAL OF THE FIRE MARSHALL20.5'30.5'20.5' 117.5'38.9'144.2' 16.8'30'18'20.5'36'128'20.5'30'Park62.2'PuttingGreenPROP. GENERAL EGRESS ACCESS ONLY.GATES WILL NOT SWINGINTO EGRESS (TYP.) 13.9' 13.5' 13.6' 13.7 ' 13.7 ' 13.9 ' 13.9'EX. CURB &GUTTER (TYP.)EX. CURB &GUTTER (TYP.)PROP. PROJECT BOUNDARY& R/W (TYP.)PROP. GARAGE (TYP.)PROP. GARAGE (TYP.)PROP. CARPORT (TYP.)PROP. CARPORT (TYP.)PROP.CARPORT (TYP.)32'17.8'PROP. BUILDING 9TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 10TYPE "B"10,833 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,833 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,833 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,499 SF (TOTAL)20' 26'=11°29'14" R=1863.00' L=373.51'19.5'20.5'30'20.5'21.9'22'18'18'21.4'15.2 ' 18' 30' 10'PORTOLA AVENUEParking To BeDevelopedif NecessaryPROP. LANDSCAPEPARKWAY (TYP.)EX. PROPERTIES TO BE MERGEDWITH FINAL DESIGN PLANSPROP. PROPERTY FENCE PER LANDSCAPE &ARCHITECTURE PLANS (TYP.)69 ADDITIONALSPACES13.9'NOPARKINGPROP. BUILDING 8TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP. BUILDING 9TYPE "A"10,752 SF (1ST FLOOR)10,752 SF (2ND FLOOR)10,752 SF (3RD FLOOR)32,256 SF (TOTAL)PROP.BUILDING 15FITNESS2,553 SF (1ST FLR)2,049 SF (2ND FLR)4,602 SF (TOTAL)48 ADDITIONALSPACES - NETPARKINGLEASING / CLUBHOUSEPROP.BUILDING 15FITNESS2,553 SF (1ST FLR)2,049 SF (2ND FLR)4,602 SF (TOTAL)14.9'20.5'30'22.8 'N 01°21'56" E 1923.00'9' TYP.68.1'27 ADDITIONALSPACES - NETMSA CONSULTING, INC.Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape ArchitecturePlanning Environmental Services Dry Utility Coordination GIS34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 | 760.320.9811 | MSAConsultinginc.comEASTNORTHSOUTHWESTCENTERLINEEASEMENTEXISTING(E)(N)(S)(W)C/LESMT.EX.ABBREVIATIONSACREAGEACCURB AND GUTTERC&GASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERAPNE/P EDGE OF PAVEMENTA.C. ASPHALT CONCRETEMAX. MAXIMUMBOUNDARYBNDRYM.B. MAP BOOKEXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONEEXISTING SEWEREXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED CURBPROPOSED EASEMENTEXISTING PROJECT BOUNDARYEXISTING SEWER FORCE MAINEXISTING WATERPROPOSED LOT LINEPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINEPROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARYEXISTING IRRIGATIONEXISTING GASEXISTING EASEMENTEXISTING ELECTRICEXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINEEXISTING CABLEEXISTING CONTOURSEXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONSLEGENDEXISTING LOT LINEEXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENTEXISTING TELEPHONEMIN. MINIMUMNUMBERPROPOSEDRIGHT OF WAYTYPICALNO.PROP.R/WTYP.P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTSF SQUARE FEETRADIUSRSTANDARDSTD.P/L PROPERTY LINEN.T.S. NOT TO SCALER-L LOW DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL)UG UNDERGROUNDOVERHEADO/HOPEN SPACE / PARKSOS/PPPAGEPG.PROPOSED PARKING STALLSXCUP SITE PLANDATA TABLEASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:620-400-030 & -031EXHIBIT DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2022SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY:ADDRESS:INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY:DECEMBER 22, 2021EXHIBIT PREPARER:ADDRESS:MSA CONSULTING, INC.34200 BOB HOPE DRIVERANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270CONTACT:PAUL DEPALATIS, AICPTELEPHONE:(760) 320-9811REVISIONSNO. DATEIN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIALEGAL DESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTIONA PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST,SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.TELEPHONE:(951) 687-4252APPLICANT /ADDRESS:CONTACT:5021 VERNON AVENUE, SUITE 201EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436CALVIN HAYESHAYES DIETRICH, LLCLAND OWNER:EXISTING GROSS ACREAGELAND USE DESCRIPTION:AMENITY LANDSCAPE AREAS0.82 AC.35,658 SF5%TOTAL BUILDING AREA (GROUND FLOOR AREA)4.40 AC.191,203 SF24%6.90 AC.300,538 SF38%GARAGES, ACCESS ROADS, HARDSCAPE & PARKING18.31 AC.ACREAGE797,567 SFSF-PERCENTAGE- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "A" (5, 7-9 & 12)- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "B" (4, 6 & 10)53,760 SF32,499 SF1.23 AC.0.75 AC.--DATA TABLE (CONTINUED)EXISTING ZONING:PROPOSED ZONING:EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, 22 DU/AC. (P.R.-22)PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, 22 DU/AC. (P.R.-22)TOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOODTOWN CENTER NEIGHBORHOODBUILDING DESCRIPTION:STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "A" (BUILDING NO(S). 5, 7, 8, 9 & 12)3 STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "B" (BUILDING NO(S). 4, 6 & 10)3 STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "C" (BUILDING NO(S). 1-3)3 STORYRESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "D" (BUILDING NO. 11)3 STORYPROPOSED PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION0.16 AC.6,756 SF-(FRANK SINATRA DRIVE)PROPOSED NET ACREAGE18.15 AC.790,811 SF100%PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "A"SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED515 STALLS240 STALLSONSITE PARKING DATA:COUNTPARKING RATIOUNITS / SF120 UNITS---(BUILDING NO(S). 5, 7, 8, 9 & 12)TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED394 UNITS-788 STALLSPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "B"(BUILDING NO(S). 4, 6 & 10)PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "C"(BUILDING NO(S). 1-3)PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "D"(BUILDING NO. 11)72 UNITS -72 UNITS -21 UNITS -144 STALLS144 STALLS42 STALLSDATA TABLE (CONTINUED)RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "E" (BUILDING NO. 13)LEASING / CLUBHOUSE BUILDING: (BUILDING NO. 14)1 STORY3 STORYFITNESS BUILDING: (BUILDING NO. 15)2 STORY- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "C" (1-3) 30,900 SF 0.71 AC. -- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "D" (11) 9,819 SF 0.23 AC. -- PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING: TYPE "E" (13)44,361 SF 1.02 AC. -- PROPOSED LEASING / CLUBHOUSE BUILDING (14) 17,311 SF 0.40 AC. -- PROPOSED FITNESS BUILDING (15)2,553 SF 0.06 AC. -UNDERGROUND PARKING PROVIDED157 STALLS--SUB-TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED672 STALLS-1.7 STALLS PER UNITPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: TYPE "E"(BUILDING NO. 13)109 UNITS -218 STALLSPUBLIC UTILITY PURVEYORS:ZONE "X": AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAINFEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION:LIQUEFACTION:MODERATE LIQUEFACTION ZONENOTES:1.ELECTRIC:GAS:TELEPHONE:WATER:CABLE:SEWER:USA:THIS MAP INCLUDES THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND DIVIDER.2. THERE ARE NO EXISTING DWELLINGS, BUILDINGS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES KNOWN ONTHIS PROPERTY.SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYFRONTIER COMMUNICATIONSCOACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICTSPECTRUMCOACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICTUNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT(800) 684-8123(877) 238-0092(800) 921-8101(760) 398-2651(877) 719-3278(760) 398-2651(800) 227-2600SCHOOL DISTRICT:DESERT SANDS UNIFIEDAS SHOWN ON RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS,COMMUNITY PANEL MAP NUMBER: 06065C1595GEFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 28, 2008DATA TABLE (CONTINUED)SUB-TOTAL PROOF OF PARKING PROVIDED --144 STALLSTOTAL WITH PROOF OF PARKING PROVIDED -2.07 STALLS PER UNIT 816 STALLSRETENTION BASIN PROOF OF PARKING EXHIBITSEE BELOW FOR RETENTION BASIN PROOF OF PARKING EXHIBITCOMMUNITY PARK PROOF OF PARKING EXHIBITSEE BELOW FOR COMMUNITY PARK PROOF OF PARKING EXHIBITCOMMUNITY PARK PROOF OF PARKING --48 STALLSRETENTION BASIN PROOF OF PARKING - NET --69 STALLSPUTTING GREEN PROOF OF PARKING EXHIBITSEE BELOW FOR PUTTING GREEN PROOF OF PARKING EXHIBITPROOF OF PARKINGFRANK SINATRA & PORTOLAPROJECT NAME:PUTTING GREEN PROOF OF PARKING - NET --27 STALLSLANDSCAPE, OPEN SPACE & RETENTION AREAS6.03 AC.263,412 SF33%R:\2746\Acad\Planning\Site Plan\2746 Technical Site Plan - Proof of Parking.dwg, 9/30/2022 3:45:25 PM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc.Page 83 of 118 NOPARKINGNO PARKING NO PARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGPROP. BUILDING NO. 6FF = 276.3PE = 275.8Prop. Trash Enclosure to IncludeRecycle & Organic Waste (Typ.)Prop. Trash Enclosureto Include Recycle &Organic Waste (Typ.)Ex. Curb & Gutter(Typ.)8' Meandering SidewalkPer Landscape PlanProp. Trash Enclosureto Include Recycle &Organic Waste (Typ.)Prop. Trash Enclosureto Include Recycle &Organic Waste (Typ.)PROP. BUILDINGNO. 5FF = 277.3PE = 276.8PROP. BUILDINGNO. 4FF = 278.6PE = 278.1PROP. BUILDINGNO. 3FF = 278.0PE = 277.5PROP. BUILDINGNO. 2FF = 278.6PE = 278.1PROP. BUILDINGNO. 1FF = 279.5PE = 279.0PROP. BUILDINGNO. 13FF = 280.2PE = 279.7GFF = 269.2PROP. BUILDING NO. 12FF = 277.0PE = 276.5PROP. BUILDINGNO. 7FF = 276.0PE = 275.5PROP. BUILDINGNO. 8FF = 275.4PE = 274.9PROP.BUILDINGNO. 15FF = 276.1PE = 275.6PROP. BUILDINGNO. 14FF = 278.0PE = 277.5PROP. BUILDINGNO. 9FF = 272.9PE = 272.4PROP. BUILDINGNO. 11FF = 273.5PE = 273.0PROP. BUILDINGNO. 10FF = 272.0PE = 271.5265.0BOTTOM10'Prop. 10' LandscapeSetback10'Prop. 10' LandscapeSetbackProp. 10'LandscapeSetback10'270.0BOTTOMProp. R/W Expansion 8' Meandering SIdewalk PerLandscape Plan Ex. Curb & Gutter FRANK SINATRA DRIVEPORTOLA AVENUE63'Move Ex. CatchBasin to end ofcurb return275'Remove Ex. Median to create left turn (In Only) Pocket35'279.5TC278.9TC279.3TC278.7TC277.1TC277.0TC277.8TC277.6TC277.7TC277.9TC277.9TC279.7TC278.8TC276.0TC279.0TC279.5TC279.7TC279.5TC279.3TC278.7TC278.6TC277.9TC278.2TC278.3TC277.5TC277.8TC277.5TC277.3TC277.8TC277.6TC278.1TC278.3TC277.2TC276.5TC276.3TC275.7TC278.0TC275.2TC275.0TC275.9TC274.5TC274.8TC271.7TC272.0TC274.6TC274.4TC276.0TC276.4TC276.4TC 277.3TC277.3TC277.3TC276.8 TC2763. FL276.5 TC276.0 FLJOIN EX.276.2 TC275.7 FLJOIN EX.276.8 TC276.3 FL275.5TC/LP275.0TC/HP271.0 TC270.5 FLJOIN EX.270.3FL269.9FL270.2 TC269.7 FLJOIN EX.276.7TC/LP277.0TC277.0FL273.9TC273.2FL273.6TC272.8TC272.5TC271.8TC271.0TC/LP271.2TC271.7TC271.5TC272.0TC271.2TC271.8TC270.2TC270.4TC270.0TC272.0TC272.7TC273.0TC273.8TC273.2TC273.0TC273.0TC272.8TC271.9TC271.6TC272.1FS274.0TC274.3TC273.8TC274.7TC274.2TC274.1TC271.8FS270.6TC275.0TC274.8TC274.5TC274.6TC274.1TC271.5TC271.5TC272.8TC274.9TC274.7TC275.5TC275.7TC276.1TC275.5TC275.7TC275.7TC275.3TC275.6COPING278.5RIDGE276.5COPING279.7TC278.9TC277.0FG279.0TC279.7TC279.5TC280.0TC278.8TC278.6TC278.5TC277.9TC277.7FL276.0FG276.0FG277.0FG277.0277.0FG277.9FG275.0FG277.1TC277.3TC276.6FS277.5TC277.3TC276.5FS276.2TC276.0TC276.2TC276.8TC276.6TC276.4TC276.6TC276.7TC276.9TC278.3TC278.1TC278.4TC278.2TC279.9TC279.7TC279.7TC279.5TC276.3TC276.5TC279.5TC279.2TC279.1TC272.4TC271.7TC271.1TC274.7TC274.3TC272.1TC271.9TC274.4FS273.8TC273.4TC272.7FS273.1FS272.4TC272.7FS272.5TC272.2TC271.5TC270.8FSTOP275.0270.8FL275.5FG273.8FG275.0FG277.7FG275.0FG273.0FG273.0FG260.0BOTTOM268.2BOTTOMProp. Property Fence per Landscape &Architecture Plans (Typ.)Prop. Property Fence per Landscape &Architecture Plans (Typ.)RidgeRidg e Prop. UndergroundRetention Basin (7'x80')8' Meandering SidewalkPer Landscape Plan20.5'18'30'18'34.25'POOL40.7 2 7 'Prop. 10'LandscapeSetback10' 0.6% 0.4%275.0TC/HP5.2% 5.1%70'REMOVE EXIST MEDIAN TOCREATE LEFT TURN POCKETREMOVE EXIST CURB&GUTTER TO CREATEENTRY CROSS GUTTER32.8'43.7'45.1'42.8'31.4'33.2'34.5' 17.8'20.5'30.5'20.5'16.2'18'30'18'2 1 . 8 ' 1 8 ' 3 2 ' 11.5' 22.8' 63' 20' 32.6' 46.3' 10.9'18' 13.9'55.6'309.6'17'20.5'74.1'14.9'20.5'45.1 '23.6'30.6'24'10'24'29.1'16'18'30.5'20.5'30'30' 18'20.4'18'30'18'20.5'20.5'26.9'23' 36' 23' 20' 26'128'20.5'30'20.5'26.4'18' 30' 18' 22.8 ' 24'29'29'N 27°46'33" E 840.48'N 01°21'56" E 1923.00'N 89°52'08" E 686.08'N 04°19'04" E 58.45'=23°27'29" R=1937.00' L=793.05'=11°29'14" R=1863.00' L=373.51'N 47°57'11" W29.27'117.2' 59.4'21.6'21.6'21.6'18'23.1' 9' TYP. 18' 29.4' 30' 20.5' 39.8'68.1'19.5'20.5'30'20.5'21.9'22'18'18'21.4'15.2 ' 18' 30'81.2'60.3'20.5'10' 10' 10'PORTOLA AVENUE18' 20.5'30.5'20.5' 117.5'38.9'144.2'Prop. 8'Sidewalk80' REMOVE EXIST CURB&GUTTER TO CREATEENTRY CROSS GUTTERREMOVE EXIST CURB&GUTTER TO CREATEENTRY CROSS GUTTER80'FRANK SINATRA DRIVEMSA CONSULTING, INC.Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape ArchitecturePlanning Environmental Services Dry Utility Coordination GIS34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 | 760.320.9811 | MSAConsultinginc.comEASTNORTHSOUTHWESTCENTERLINEEASEMENTEXISTING(E)(N)(S)(W)C/LESMT.EX.ABBREVIATIONSACREAGEACCURB AND GUTTERC&GASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERAPNE/P EDGE OF PAVEMENTA.C. ASPHALT CONCRETEMAX. MAXIMUMBOUNDARYBNDRYM.B. MAP BOOKEXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONEEXISTING SEWEREXISTING RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED CURBPROPOSED EASEMENTEXISTING PROJECT BOUNDARYEXISTING SEWER FORCE MAINEXISTING WATERPROPOSED LOT LINEPROPOSED RIGHT OF WAYPROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINEPROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARYEXISTING IRRIGATIONEXISTING GASEXISTING EASEMENTEXISTING ELECTRICEXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINEEXISTING CABLEEXISTING CONTOURSEXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONSLEGENDEXISTING LOT LINEEXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENTEXISTING TELEPHONEMIN. MINIMUMNUMBERPROPOSEDRIGHT OF WAYTYPICALNO.PROP.R/WTYP.P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTSF SQUARE FEETRADIUSRSTANDARDSTD.P/L PROPERTY LINEN.T.S. NOT TO SCALER-L LOW DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL)UG UNDERGROUNDOVERHEADO/HOPEN SPACE / PARKSOS/PPPAGEPG.DATA TABLEASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:620-400-030 & -031EXHIBIT DATE: JUNE 6, 2022SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY:ADDRESS:INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY:DECEMBER 22, 2021EXHIBIT PREPARER:ADDRESS:MSA CONSULTING, INC.34200 BOB HOPE DRIVERANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270CONTACT:PAUL DEPALATIS, AICPTELEPHONE:(760) 320-9811REVISIONSNO. DATEIN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIALEGAL DESCRIPTION:DESCRIPTIONA PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST,SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.TELEPHONE:(951) 687-4252APPLICANT /ADDRESS:CONTACT:5021 VERNON AVENUE, SUITE 201EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436CALVIN HAYESHAYES DIETRICH, LLCLAND OWNER:PRELIMINARYGRADING & UTILITY PLANPROPOSED PERIMETER FENCE &WALL COMBINATION. SEEARCHITECT PLAN FOR DETAILSSITERAMON RDDINAH SHORE DRGERALD FORD DRFRANK SINATRA DRCOUNTRY CLUB DRFRED WARING DRHWY 111HOVLEY LNBOB HOPE DR MONTEREY AVE PORTOLA AVE EL DORADO DR OASIS CLUB DR INTERSTATE 10COOK STN.T.S.VICINITY MAPNORTH PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATION8/17/2022 2:59:35 PM, ARCH expand E1 (30.00 x 42.00 Inches), 1:1Page 84 of 118 Overall Tree Plan L-1 Frank Sinatra / Portola Apartments | June 3, 2022 Port o l a A v e n u e Frank Sinatra DriveResidential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type D Type D Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type A Type A Leasing/ Club-Leasing/ Club- house Building house Building Type FType F Fitness Building Fitness Building Type GType G Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type B Type B Residential Residential BuildingBuilding Type B Type B BuildingBuilding Type C Type C BuildingBuilding Type C Type C BuildingBuilding Type C Type C BuildingBuilding Type E Type E 2 7 3 8 4 5 5 5 1 1 6 Trees: Acacia aneura Prosopis x Phoenix Key Notes: Pool BBQ Bocce Putting Green Retaining Area / Lawn 2 3 4 5 1 6 Yoga Lawn Acacia salincina Parkinsonia x ‘Desert Museum’ Washingtonia fi lifera Phoenix dactylifera Desert Garden Cornhole 7 8 9 Dog Park Property Wall & Fence Combination 10 4’ Ht CMU plaster block wall (color TBD) with 2’ Painted Metal picket fence view panels on top and CMU plaster pilasters at 50’ on center. 6’ Ht painted metal picket fence panels (color TBD) Property Wall & Fence Combination 10 10 Page 85 of 118 Fitness Club AreaFrank Sinatra / Portola Apartments | June 3, 2022 Key Notes: Fitness Pool Golf Cages Yoga Lawn Bocce Ball Court Cabanas Cornhole Firepit with Tumbled Glass Walking Track Putting Green / Water Retention Basin 2 2 7 7 3 3 8 8 4 4 9 9 5 5 1 1 6 6 Character Imagery 7 8 5 2 1 4 Key Map Porto l a A v e n u e Frank Sinatra DriveL-3 Page 86 of 118 Desert GardenFrank Sinatra / Portola Apartments | June 3, 2022 Key Notes: Shade Pavilion with Casual Seating Steel Brimming Bowl Open Lawn - Event Space Seating Area Desert Garden 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 1 1 1 Character Imagery 4 Key Map Porto l a A v e n u e Frank Sinatra DriveL-4 Page 87 of 118 PARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4SP4P4P4P4P4P4P4P5P5P5P5P5P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P5P5P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLP4P4P4P4P4P4BLBLBLP4P4BLP4P4P4BLBLBLBLP4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4BLBLP4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLP4P4P4P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLP4P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLP5P4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBL18.60.30.521.80.20.217.90.70.21.113.10.30.22.43.10.41.121.71.61.48.01.20.30.71.96.90.30.10.318.30.40.18.51.50.11.23.90.25.00.64.24.02.61.81.51.51.41.116.81.50.72.58.20.50.40.71.421.20.30.318.20.80.45.53.30.40.718.91.00.71.119.40.30.14.06.50.10.220.11.30.20.322.90.30.112.41.80.11.223.00.20.221.20.80.10.718.80.40.418.31.10.54.33.30.30.718.90.30.217.80.60.12.210.20.10.319.80.50.14.52.80.10.818.30.30.211.03.88.94.51.31.90.40.31.80.20.31.60.20.32.20.41.12.80.24.12.70.215.91.20.319.60.60.215.74.90.21.93.70.23.12.50.10.322.30.50.419.01.64.48.53.03.92.20.62.50.30.32.70.30.23.20.30.22.80.20.317.70.40.318.20.40.318.40.40.418.60.52.80.20.922.80.20.922.80.20.922.81.56.10.320.60.64.82.40.40.716.31.10.51.80.30.22.00.30.22.30.40.41.811.55.3 2.7 1.81.72.3 3.6 5.21.72.3 4.2 10.46.1 2.8 1.7 1.4 1.9 2.8 3.13.6 2.2 1.9 2.4 3.6 7.1 7.23.7 2.0 1.31.51.6 1.8 1.81.45.53.9 2.51.71.9 2.84.15.30.5 1.1 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.82.1 3.3 3.7 3.1 2.2 1.5 1.8 2.7 3.6 3.01.42.9 2.6 2.0 1.3 0.7 1.01.41.9 1.61.72.2 2.3 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.2 3.5 3.4 3.21.46.5 4.3 2.9 1.8 1.1 1.6 2.52.7 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.64.45.9 5.6 2.29.8 7.9 3.5 2.3 1.8 2.13.5 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 4.2 8.0 12.48.3 3.9 2.3 1.9 2.1 2.94.55.0 3.7 3.0 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.0 1.7 3.42.7 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.3 3.1 3.1 2.7 2.9 3.3 4.27.48.3 4.61.3 1.8 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.53.1 6.5 10.04.42.9 2.6 1.91.51.98.55.53.2 2.2 1.9 2.64.56.28.6 3.4 2.3 2.1 2.5 4.2 10.56.5 3.7 2.2 2.1 2.4 3.5 6.2 7.11.71.9 1.9 2.2 2.7 3.3 4.31.6 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 1.5 1.36.0 3.6 3.0 2.2 1.9 2.1 3.32.010.5 6.6 3.3 2.4 2.1 2.54.78.811.6 6.2 3.3 1.58.0 3.3 2.2 1.9 2.54.19.73.9 6.15.43.6 2.7 2.04.8 3.0 1.7 1.4 2.0 3.1 5.0 6.44.51.8 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 2.9 2.4 1.41.2 0.9 0.81.72.4 3.4 3.210.97.54.0 2.8 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.6 3.2 3.3 1.91.0 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.5 2.52.3 4.64.53.8 3.1 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.9 4.2 6.3 6.4 3.22.2 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.3 1.63.11.7 1.72.8 2.9 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.4 3.77.112.52.85.0 3.7 2.3 1.7 2.0 3.34.54.3 3.0 1.8 1.5 2.0 2.6 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.7 1.8 2.32.05.410.3 9.12.4 0.8 1.2 2.4 4.3 6.44.12.36.3 3.8 2.2 1.61.72.4 2.8 2.8 2.31.51.3 1.6 2.7 3.5 6.6 8.95.53.8 1.7 2.5 4.9 6.4 5.91.9 1.64.46.4 7.1 5.2 2.7 0.9 1.3 2.3 3.4 3.7 3.2 2.33.6 3.1 2.1 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.0 1.0 2.1 5.3 8.96.3 6.32.5 2.2 2.5 2.6 3.1 2.9 2.3 1.9 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.2 2.5 2.1 1.31.11.8 2.3 2.1 2.11.7 1.4 1.41.9 2.2 2.0 2.01.41.01.41.8 1.8 1.81.50.9 1.21.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.9 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.1 0.70.9 1.7 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.21.52.2 2.0 2.1 2.11.7 1.71.8 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.81.71.9 2.2 2.21.7 1.5 1.72.0 2.5 2.9 2.5 2.0 1.2 0.91.11.0 0.9 0.51.0 2.0 3.4 4.82.3 2.8 1.8 1.3 1.7 2.9 4.2 3.1 2.1 2.7 3.42.2 1.6 2.1 2.6 3.4 3.2 2.7 1.8 1.6 3.0 3.7 4.8 3.81.5 1.2 0.8 0.51.0 2.0 3.65.0 3.01.41.0 2.14.3 2.45.1 7.72.5 0.8 2.45.57.9 7.3 4.81.7 1.13.9 7.9 11.6 7.91.8 3.3 2.5 2.11.50.9 0.7 1.2 2.1 3.07.43.9 1.4 1.0 2.26.6 5.9 3.5 1.9 1.3 1.0 1.5 1.8 2.16.2 3.51.41.2 2.4 3.3 7.011.76.0 3.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.6 1.2 1.0 0.94.2 2.8 1.3 1.4 2.7 4.3 5.12.8 2.62.5 1.9 1.1 0.6 0.7 1.21.0 1.61.5 1.42.6 4.3 6.02.7 1.61.42.3 4.01.6 1.9 1.2 1.4 2.6 4.2 9.26.0 2.9 2.1 2.0 2.7 6.14.72.71.11.2 2.64.510.86.3 2.8 2.0 2.2 3.05.511.66.6 3.6 1.3 1.2 2.0 3.3 6.53.8 2.2 1.7 2.1 2.7 3.5 6.36.5 3.6 1.31.12.11.11.8 1.9 2.1 2.4 3.1 1.94.6 2.8 1.2 1.2 2.13.1 3.1 2.2 2.0 1.6 1.4 0.81.41.8 1.2 1.3 2.06.55.13.1 2.21.71.6 2.30.8 1.3 1.5 1.3 2.69.3 3.8 2.5 1.9 2.1 3.57.44.2 3.11.71.3 2.58.3 4.0 2.2 1.9 2.3 3.5 8.06.3 4.1 2.2 1.2 1.82.7 1.9 1.7 2.1 3.04.77.08.5 4.8 2.31.11.61.3 1.81.71.9 2.1 2.9 3.44.9 3.4 1.9 1.2 1.6 1.8 1.52.9 3.5 2.3 2.0 1.72.3 2.51.71.3 1.9 3.2 4.96.6 3.4 2.31.71.60.5 1.0 1.6 1.5 2.4 4.0 8.811.2 4.6 2.7 1.9 1.82.8 3.1 1.91.42.64.5 11.17.74.8 2.41.71.9 2.85.512.35.0 4.1 2.3 1.4 2.0 3.3 6.82.9 2.0 1.6 1.8 2.7 4.0 7.68.85.42.7 1.2 1.8 2.6 3.01.3 1.6 1.81.72.0 2.6 3.94.73.9 2.3 1.2 1.6 1.9 1.32.5 3.8 2.5 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.12.6 3.0 2.0 1.31.72.7 3.67.3 3.8 2.7 2.0 1.8 1.8 2.20.4 0.7 1.4 1.4 2.1 3.1 7.012.0 5.2 2.9 2.2 2.2 3.3 6.21.2 2.3 1.91.42.34.110.37.0 5.2 2.5 2.1 2.4 3.3 8.02.8 4.1 2.3 1.4 2.1 3.3 7.63.1 2.1 1.8 2.3 3.3 5.8 8.66.25.73.0 1.31.72.94.11.31.5 1.72.1 2.5 3.4 5.04.9 2.8 1.3 1.6 2.0 1.42.7 3.4 2.4 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.53.6 2.3 1.31.52.2 2.45.16.1 3.1 2.31.71.1 1.4 1.3 1.7 2.75.72.6 1.9 1.8 2.2 2.50.9 1.3 1.3 2.0 3.5 8.62.4 2.2 2.4 4.2 6.63.8 2.4 1.3 2.0 3.3 7.82.2 2.3 3.0 4.8 11.35.3 3.01.51.6 2.6 4.91.8 2.2 2.3 2.94.18.76.2 3.5 1.3 1.5 2.0 1.83.9 2.6 2.2 2.3 2.8 4.84.52.61.4 1.51.91.77.13.4 2.6 2.2 2.1 1.62.4 2.1 1.4 1.5 2.44.510.6 4.2 2.8 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.70.51.1 1.41.8 3.0 6.77.6 3.5 2.4 2.2 2.3 4.0 5.33.1 2.5 1.4 1.8 3.2 7.33.7 2.9 2.0 2.1 2.8 5.0 10.35.0 2.91.51.6 2.5 5.31.11.21.52.0 3.0 4.9 10.87.0 3.8 1.5 1.5 2.1 2.52.0 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.3 3.4 6.25.3 3.11.5 1.41.91.41.35.8 3.7 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.8 2.63.5 2.6 1.4 1.4 2.2 3.5 3.610.6 5.3 3.0 2.1 2.2 2.8 2.90.6 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.6 5.2 7.010.55.42.9 2.2 2.0 2.9 6.21.3 1.7 1.4 1.6 3.1 6.6 12.45.44.3 2.3 1.9 2.3 3.6 8.84.6 2.91.51.6 2.55.16.71.9 2.0 1.81.52.2 3.3 7.3 6.96.8 3.8 1.8 1.5 2.3 3.4 3.41.3 1.4 1.9 2.8 5.0 4.97.2 4.0 1.81.52.2 1.91.71.91.51.6 2.1 2.6 3.04.9 2.9 1.6 1.5 2.3 3.6 3.82.8 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.5 2.61.6 2.01.51.6 2.63.3 1.8 0.9 0.60.9 1.4 1.6 1.7 3.13.8 0.8 2.1 4.9 6.6 6.9 5.0 2.4 2.4 5.9 9.3 8.85.41.8 0.7 2.85.5 7.56.4 4.2 1.5 2.0 4.8 6.9 7.0 5.0 2.1 1.44.4 7.53.3 1.33.2 1.8 0.8 0.73.84.53.4 2.14.3 3.01.71.6 2.5 5.02.0 1.0 1.9 2.5 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.9 3.8 2.9 1.9 1.3 2.2 2.6 3.4 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.8 3.32.6 1.62.31.50.8 0.72.6 2.6 2.31.76.4 3.9 2.0 1.3 2.2 3.5 3.6 1.6 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.3 0.98.44.52.0 0.9 1.21.41.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.91.71.6 1.61.71.9 2.0 1.91.5 1.15.0 3.2 1.7 0.8 0.5 0.9 1.9 2.6 3.3 3.1 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.3 2.6 2.1 2.0 2.4 2.7 3.3 2.7 2.3 2.0 2.2 2.5 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 3.3 2.8 2.4 2.0 2.1 2.5 3.2 3.1 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.2 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.4 2.7 3.3 2.6 2.3 1.22.4 2.41.50.7 1.07.3 6.74.71.91.7 4.46.3 6.95.12.51.43.65.77.3 5.6 3.56.2 4.2 2.2 3.35.57.3 5.8 3.81.42.35.16.8 6.44.51.81.74.3 6.3 7.0 5.2 2.5 1.3 3.65.77.3 5.6 3.50.6 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.63.6 1.3 2.1 5.2 10.0 8.4 4.6 1.5 1.54.47.9 10.45.42.2 1.3 3.3 6.3 12.1 6.2 3.23.3 3.11.7 1.12.0 3.4 8.05.6 3.9 2.0 1.0 2.1 3.9 9.68.8 5.0 2.3 1.0 1.9 3.0 6.65.2 3.7 2.0 1.1 1.6 2.6 3.43.0 2.9 1.8 1.0 1.6 2.0 1.30.4 0.8 1.4 1.2 1.5 2.3 2.91.52.3 1.81.1 1.72.6 5.83.8 3.9 2.0 1.0 1.8 3.4 8.28.15.42.7 0.9 1.8 3.0 6.95.4 4.72.5 1.0 1.4 2.5 4.30.8 0.9Luminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyLabelDescriptionLLFLuminaireLumensLuminaireWatts156BLLED BOLLARD0.950209418.4378P4LED AREA POST LIGHT TYPE IV DIST0.9501071510611P4SLED AREA POST TOP TYPE IV DIST HSS0.950604210611P5LED AREA POST TOP TYPE V DIST0.95011181106Calculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinPed Path 1IlluminanceFc4.1621.80.141.60218.00Ped Path 2IlluminanceFc4.7223.00.147.20230.00Ped Path 3IlluminanceFc3.7822.30.137.80223.00Ped Path 4IlluminanceFc4.0422.80.220.20114.00Street-Parking-1IlluminanceFc3.0812.50.47.7031.25FRANK SINATRA - PORTOLAMAINTAINED HORIZONTAL ILLUMINANCE CALCULATIONS AT FINISH GRADE6-7-22Drawn BySheet No.Job No.ScaleTitleChecked ByIssueNo.DateDateCommercial Lighting Industries81161 Indio Boulevard, Indio, CA 92201Tel: 800-755-0155 | Fax: 760-262-3940ALL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY OFCOMMERCIAL LIGHTING IND. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.ALL MEASUREMENTS MUST BE CHECKED ON SITE BYTHE CONTRACTORS AND ANY DISCREPANCIES BROUGHTTO THE ATTENTION OF THE DESIGNER OR ARCHITECT.FRANK SINATRA - PORTOLA Page 90 of 118 Luminaire ScheduleSymbolQtyLabelDescriptionLLFLuminaireLumensLuminaireWatts156BLLED BOLLARD0.950209418.4378P4LED AREA POST LIGHT TYPE IV DIST0.9501071510611P4SLED AREA POST TOP TYPE IV DIST HSS0.950604210611P5LED AREA POST TOP TYPE V DIST0.95011181106Calculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinMax/MinPed Path 1IlluminanceFc4.1621.80.141.60218.00Ped Path 2IlluminanceFc4.7223.00.147.20230.00Ped Path 3IlluminanceFc3.7822.30.137.80223.00Ped Path 4IlluminanceFc4.0422.80.220.20114.00Street-Parking-1IlluminanceFc3.0812.50.47.7031.25P4P5P5P5P5P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4P4BLBLBLBLP4BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLP4P4P418.91.00.71.119.40.30.14.06.50.10.220.11.318.30.30.211.02.00.10.518.60.20.220.40.90.11.516.90.20.317.30.40.16.63.80.10.617.70.30.29.40.90.30.815.03.11.31.712.40.40.317.80.50.24.23.40.20.920.50.80.421.90.60.16.24.30.10.618.60.30.113.32.20.10.417.10.40.12.210.20.10.218.80.70.12.73.10.10.619.10.30.11.420.10.30.112.41.50.10.721.20.20.217.20.70.13.04.40.10.518.60.20.13.05.60.29.90.6 1.7 3.0 5.0 6.41.2 2.1 3.2 3.29.70.8 1.7 2.7 2.9 4.31.4 3.84.54.01.91.12.1 2.9 6.56.5 3.71.52.2 2.3 2.4 1.81.7 1.40.7 1.6 2.85.511.310.6 5.9 3.3 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.9 2.11.3 2.4 3.4 5.93.14.74.2 3.3 2.3 1.9 1.61.71.8 2.51.2 1.9 2.3 3.2 2.59.2 5.3 3.3 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.3 3.3 6.52.0 1.9 2.1 2.7 2.86.4 8.8 6.2 3.3 3.1 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.3 1.9 1.8 4.9 8.22.6 2.1 1.9 2.2 3.35.9 3.8 3.4 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.3 3.0 3.8 4.3 2.4 1.38.5 4.3 2.9 1.9 2.04.3 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.2 5.2 9.4 7.911.9 5.6 2.5 1.6 1.9 2.9 3.9 6.84.72.4 2.4 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.2 3.8 6.75.2 2.81.71.8 2.0 2.5 3.4 2.6 2.5 2.9 4.27.17.34.11.9 1.4 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.87.0 11.72.0 3.3 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.24.2 6.4 3.8 2.9 2.2 2.1 3.7 9.211.8 6.0 3.0 2.2 2.5 3.4 6.5 8.66.7 3.1 2.0 2.2 2.8 3.3 5.03.9 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.4 1.9 1.31.4 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.43.3 4.3 2.7 2.4 2.1 2.34.47.88.54.53.1 2.2 2.4 3.8 9.33.0 2.112.4 6.2 2.7 2.0 2.4 3.25.16.811.46.64.74.2 6.45.8 3.1 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.9 3.44.0 6.05.43.8 3.6 3.9 6.1 11.92.11.52.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 1.8 1.84.72.2 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.5 3.2 3.9 6.51.9 3.0 2.3 2.2 2.0 2.54.411.05.73.3 2.5 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.4 2.1 2.4 3.4 2.34.65.53.3 2.6 2.2 2.34.410.75.3 6.3 5.2 3.3 2.4 2.1 1.81.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.510.9 5.2 2.9 2.3 2.7 3.83.0 3.0 2.4 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.9 2.5 1.8 1.26.2 2.7 2.0 2.3 2.83.2 2.4 2.11.71.31.72.5 3.74.53.6 2.14.3 2.4 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.7 2.3 2.0 2.2 2.2 1.6 1.3 1.6 2.6 4.21.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.81.72.1 2.7 3.0 2.31.5 1.43.2 3.8 2.5 2.1 1.6 1.9 3.13.07.3 3.9 2.8 1.9 2.012.15.42.7 1.9 1.8 2.5 3.6 3.75.72.91.71.6 2.0 2.4 2.22.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.10.61.5 1.51.2 1.01.1 1.42.1 3.2 2.2 1.7 1.0 1.3 2.1 3.06.1 3.4 2.41.51.6 2.6 4.04.211.5 5.3 2.7 1.8 1.7 2.3 3.6 5.21.7 2.3 4.2 10.46.1 2.81.7 1.41.9 2.8 3.13.6 2.2 1.9 2.4 3.67.17.23.7 2.0 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.45.53.9 2.5 1.7 1.9 2.8 4.1 5.30.51.11.61.51.2 1.0 0.82.1 3.3 3.7 3.1 2.21.51.8 2.7 3.6 3.0FRANK SINATRA - PORTOLAMAINTAINED HORIZONTAL ILLUMINANCE CALCULATIONS AT FINISH GRADE6-7-22Street-Parking-1IlluminanceFc3.0812.50.47.7031.25Drawn BySheet No.Job No.ScaleTitleChecked ByIssueNo.DateDateCommercial Lighting Industries81161 Indio Boulevard, Indio, CA 92201Tel: 800-755-0155 | Fax: 760-262-3940ALL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY OFCOMMERCIAL LIGHTING IND. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS.ALL MEASUREMENTS MUST BE CHECKED ON SITE BYTHE CONTRACTORS AND ANY DISCREPANCIES BROUGHTTO THE ATTENTION OF THE DESIGNER OR ARCHITECT.FRANK SINATRA - PORTOLA Page 91 of 118 October 19, 2022 Nick Melloni Senior Planner City of Palm Desert – Development Services 73510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Nmelloni@cityofpalmdesert.org RE: Frank Sinatra and Portola Development – Response to ARC Comments Dear Mr. Melloni, Please find this memo as a response to the comments from the Architectural Review Commission (“ARC”) on October 11th for the proposed multifamily development at Frank Sinatra and Portola. Our design team extensively looked at those comments and questions to determine what modifications could be made to further enhance the development. The list of comments and questions below discuss what changes were made in depth. 1. The Commission asked the Applicant for more developed landscaping along the street frontage and to enhance the main corner at Frank Sinatra and Portola to be more of a showcase, feature element. a. At the meeting, the Applicant responded with the landscaping was not fully shown in order for the Commission to be able to better view the buildings for comments. An image of the landscaping across Portola Avenue looking at The Retreat development was shown and the Applicant stated this would be similar to what the landscaping along this development would look like and similarly as dense. In response to this comment, the design team added in the denser landscaping to reflect the full design along the street frontages and at the primary corner. The primary corner creates a similar look to the southeast corner of this intersection. The signage area and perimeter fencing were also enhanced by providing angled stone pilasters and an additional signage backdrop tied into the fencing. 2. The Commission asked the Applicant to look at further enhancing the primary entrance off of Portola, including changing the asphalt to pavers or something similar, looking at the perimeter fence, and further enhancing the landscaping. a. The design team added the enhanced landscaping to the rendering to better show how that would look. To create more visual impact at the perimeter wall, stone and angled stone pilasters were added around that main entrance. Page 92 of 118 Portions of the asphalt were also removed and replaced with a paver system that ties into the central roundabout in front of the clubhouse to create a more prominent entry. On the buildings, this area added stone features to the chimney architectural elements of the buildings to also provide a more prominent aesthetic. 3. The Commission asked the Applicant to look at providing a little more differentiation in the perimeter fence. a. In addition to enhancing the primary entry to the site and corner at Frank Sinatra and Portola, the design added back the open pickets periodically around the perimeter of the site that were in the previous design. These were removed to address neighbor concerns with headlights of vehicles. While putting these open sections back, they have been strategically placed such that vehicle headlights would not be an issue. Also, the landscaping team has added taller fuller growing shrubs behind those open picket sections that will mitigate any potential vehicle headlights that the 4-foot block wall section would have blocked and still protect the neighbors’ concerns. 4. The Commission asked about the grading and sloping, off-site conditions of the development. a. As described in the meeting, the northern portion of the site will be cut down 2-3 feet on average to bring the site down closer to the street and to provide appropriate drainage through the site. Due to the grades on site, the slopes for drainage are naturally sloped towards the southern portion of the site. 5. The Commission requested the Applicant reinvestigate the setbacks on street frontages. a. The Applicant has studied this extensively since the inception of the project in January and has previously addressed this as much as possible. The buildings running perpendicular were previously pulled back where able several feet to 6 feet from the setback requirement. The buildings that run parallel with Portola were previously pulled back 12 and 26 feet from the setback requirement. Due to the internal roads for site circulation and the needs for utility infrastructure under those roads, we are unable to push the buildings back any further. 6. The Commission requested that the Applicant look at adding new windows to the ends of the stairwell breezeways for the elevations that face street frontages. Page 93 of 118 a. The Applicant did not add windows in the stairwell breezeways due to concerns of creating a “heat box” in those areas. By putting in a window it would not allow for the breeze to extend through those areas and cause more heat and buildup of additional sand blown into the area. It is also the Applicant’s understanding that there was a recently approved development that removed the windows and unenclosed those stairwells due to the same concerns and due to the cooling of those areas being unsustainable and an unnecessary use of energy. 7. The Commission voiced support for the Applicant’s alternative plan that would remove as much parking as possible to meet the parking analysis’ recommendation of 1.8 stalls per unit, while creating as much open space as possible. The main priority of additional open space would to be remove the central parking and put the park feature back in along Portola Avenue. a. The Applicant agrees that more open space would enhance the site and removing the unnecessary parking would be an overall benefit to the development and the community. The Applicant would propose the ARC provides the following condition to the development to create this outcome. “The project is to reduce the overall parking stalls provided to match the parking analysis of 1.8 stalls per unit (710 stalls) to further allow more open space for the project. The project would remove the community park parking, fitness/putting green parking and the remainder of the stall reduction to be removed from the southern portion of the dog park/retention basin area to get to the 710 parking stalls. The Applicant would then build out those areas consistent with the alternative plan provided.” 8. The Commission requested that the mechanical enclosures on top of the central elevator residential building be addressed as the louvers looked too utilitarian. a. The Applicant has removed the accent-colored louvers to try and have the extension of the building blend in with the overall façade. 9. The Commission asked the Applicant to try and tie the garage design to the rest of the buildings a little further. a. The Applicant has added a stone section of the wall to the ends of the garages. These stone sections will protrude slightly higher than the roof of the garage and tie to the features at the amenity building and the bases of the residential balconies. Page 94 of 118 10. The Commission asked that the Applicant review the balconies to integrate them more into the building and to look at making modifications to the railings. a. Across the development, the balcony posts have been thickened to create a heavier, more bold sense at the balconies. The railing has also been modified to have thicker slats to provide more privacy on the balconies and create a bolder sense to the structure. At the elevator residential building, the balconies at the corners and main areas were revised to incorporate stone columns stretching from the first floor up through the third floor with the thicker posts at the third floor. In addition, these balconies have the base floor of levels two and three wrapping around the stone columns to further integrate them as part of the structure and show an extension of the interior floorplate. With the secondary sections of the residential elevator building balconies and the walk-up residential buildings, the stone wingwalls have been integrated into the balcony and the balcony floor wraps around those wingwalls to extend the structure. The balcony deign creates variety by become more open higher up creating more privacy on the ground floors and more outward views higher up. 11. The Commission requested the Applicant review the overall composition of the development at the focal points (primary entrance and intersection corner) as well as the entire site. With this, the Commission also asked to look at varying parapet heights, creating more variety with the chimneys and investigating the creation of different elements across sections of the buildings. a. The design team further studied the main theme of tying the building architecture together while creating more visual interest across the site. From this they revised the design of the parapets to angle up to the corners of the buildings from the more central locations lower parapet heights. This design ties into the main feature of the amenity buildings in the central portion of the site and provides varying heights creating more interest and addressing the previous comment about the buildings being “boxy.” At the primary entry and intersection corner, the chimneys were revised to be a stone architectural feature in lieu of the stucco chimneys. This also provides some variation in the chimney architectural elements across the development. As well, the angled stone pilasters at the main entry and primary corner tie in with the newly angled parapets to help achieve a less static and boxy appearance. Previously the stucco accent color between the windows at the walk-up residential building was intended to be a subtle accent color change. That color has been revised to be a Page 95 of 118 Page 96 of 118 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOTICE OF ACTION October 21, 2022 Hayes Dietrich, LLC 5021 Vernon Ave S, Suite 201 Edina, MN 55436 Subject: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration to construct a 394-unit market-rate multifamily community consisting of thirteen three- story apartment buildings, a two-story fitness center, a single-story clubhouse, two (2) pool areas, and private outdoor recreation areas on an 18.67-acre site located at the southwest corner of Frank Sinatra Drive and Portola Avenue (APNs: 620-400-030 and 620-400-031). The Architectural Review Commission of the City of Palm Desert considered your request at its meeting of October 11, 2022: Following discussion, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, CARRIED 6-0 to: 1. Continue Case No. PP/CUP22-0006 to a date uncertain. 2. Provide a more comprehensive landscape plan for street facing frontages and main entry on Frank Sinatra and Portola Avenue. 3. Provide more elements for texture and variation to enhance entryway including entry gate design and roundabout, such as decorative pavers and increased landscaping. 4. Revisit setbacks with consideration to the heights of the buildings to provide an increase to proposed setbacks. 5. Revisit design and explore options for enclosing street facing stairwells. 6. Provide more articulation and design elements to enhance corner of Frank Sinatra and Portola Ave. including signage, landscaping, layering, and height variation for more interest to this prominent corner. 7. Consider incorporating more green space in plan (Area #8), utilizing elements of alternative option as shown by applicant. 8. Revisit balconies, provide design which allow balconies to integrate with the building, incorporate variation for balcony design as opposed to uniformity and explore solid railing as an option to mitigate concerns for visibility of stored items. Page 97 of 118 9. Revisit scale of buildings and incorporate a hierarchy of buildings to break down massing and avoid repetitive building masses. 10. Provide more variation and design for exterior wall surrounding community. 11. Revisit architecture of garages and incorporate elements which better relate to architecture of residential units. 12. Ensure openings of enclosures for mechanical equipment are not visible from all vantage points. 13. Provide variation in parapet heights to avoid repetition. 14. Break down building masses and create more interest through use of one and two- story elements that overlap different vertical pieces of the building. 15. Provide more architectural elements to elevator housing to avoid utilitarian look. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within 15 days of the date of the decision. If you have any questions, please contact Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, at (760) 776-6479 or nmelloni@cityofpalmdesert.org. Sincerely, ROSIE LUA, SECRETARY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION cc: File Page 98 of 118 From:CouncilMeeting Comments To:alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com Cc:Alan Vanderpool; Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone Subject:RE: Opposition to HD Project Date:Monday, August 22, 2022 11:43:12 AM Good morning Mr. Vanderpool, Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of the public record. Kind regards, Niamh M. Ortega Deputy City Clerk Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487 nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org From: alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com <alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 8:46 AM To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org> Cc: Alan Vanderpool <pattivanderpool@yahoo.com> Subject: Opposition to HD Project We strongly oppose the high density, 3-story, apartment complex proposed to be built at Frank Sinatra and Portola for the following reasons: 1. Obstruction of our beautiful mountain views because of the 3 story profile of the structures and mass of the complex. 2. Extremely high density housing inconsistent with the existing residential communities in the area. 3. Marked negative impact on traffic (650 proposed parking spaces) and increase in noise impacting the quiet community we live in today. The entrance to the property of 300+ units is directly across from our residences. 3. Invasion of privacy. Looking into residences and down into yards. 4. Boxy 3 story buildings inconsistent with the existing luxury housing surrounding the area. Desert Willow Golf Course and resort-style communities already exist in that intersection. Those developments are single and two story. Page 99 of 118 5. Too close to the street, not adequately set back from the street. No walls for sound mitigation. 6. Such a large apartment complex would create a transient community of perhaps 600 plus people surrounded by an otherwise stable population. Please deny this project as presently proposed for all of the serious concerns identified. Respectfully, Alan and Patti VANDERPOOL 501 Retreat Circle Palm Desert 92260 Page 100 of 118 From:CouncilMeeting Comments To:alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com Cc:Alan Vanderpool; Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone Subject:RE: Opposition to HD Project Date:Monday, August 22, 2022 11:43:12 AM Good morning Mr. Vanderpool, Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of the public record. Kind regards, Niamh M. Ortega Deputy City Clerk Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487 nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org From: alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com <alan.vanderpool@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 8:46 AM To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org> Cc: Alan Vanderpool <pattivanderpool@yahoo.com> Subject: Opposition to HD Project We strongly oppose the high density, 3-story, apartment complex proposed to be built at Frank Sinatra and Portola for the following reasons: 1. Obstruction of our beautiful mountain views because of the 3 story profile of the structures and mass of the complex. 2. Extremely high density housing inconsistent with the existing residential communities in the area. 3. Marked negative impact on traffic (650 proposed parking spaces) and increase in noise impacting the quiet community we live in today. The entrance to the property of 300+ units is directly across from our residences. 3. Invasion of privacy. Looking into residences and down into yards. 4. Boxy 3 story buildings inconsistent with the existing luxury housing surrounding the area. Desert Willow Golf Course and resort-style communities already exist in that intersection. Those developments are single and two story. Page 101 of 118 5. Too close to the street, not adequately set back from the street. No walls for sound mitigation. 6. Such a large apartment complex would create a transient community of perhaps 600 plus people surrounded by an otherwise stable population. Please deny this project as presently proposed for all of the serious concerns identified. Respectfully, Alan and Patti VANDERPOOL 501 Retreat Circle Palm Desert 92260 Page 102 of 118 From:CouncilMeeting Comments To:Sue Hammans Cc:Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone Subject:RE: No 394 Walk-up apartments on Portola/Frank Sinatra by HD Date:Monday, August 22, 2022 11:45:33 AM Good morning Mr. and Mrs. Hammans, Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of the public record. Kind regards, Niamh M. Ortega Deputy City Clerk Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487 nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org -----Original Message----- From: Sue Hammans <suehammans@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 4:10 PM To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org> Subject: No 394 Walk-up apartments on Portola/Frank Sinatra by HD Members of the City Council of Palm Desert: Steve and Sue Hammans 1801 Retreat Circle Palm Desert The Retreat at Desert Willow We love Palm Desert, if we wanted to live in Indio, Cathedral City or Desert Hot Springs we would have built a home there. We chose Palm Desert because of the beautiful Golf Courses, views of the mountains, and the feel of this amazing location. We have enough manufactured homes and now this project doesn’t fit our upscale Palm Desert. The traffic all hours of the day and night will be ridiculous. No vested interest renters with three story boxes over looking our properties is not a good idea, these proposed apartments will not fit our environment. Come on Palm Desert, we don’t need this. Let’s have our one story or two story homes in this area. We want growth, but, not at this cost to the neighborhood! Steve and Sue Hammans Sent from my iPad Page 103 of 118 From:CouncilMeeting Comments To:Cynthia Rankowitz Cc:Marshall Rankowitz; Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone Subject:RE: HD Portola – Frank Sinatra project. Date:Monday, August 22, 2022 11:46:28 AM Attachments:We sent you safe versions of your files.msg Good morning Mr. and Mrs. Rankowitz, Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of the public record. Kind regards, Niamh M. Ortega Deputy City Clerk Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487 nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org From: Cynthia Rankowitz <ccilwik@snet.net> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2022 4:12 PM To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org> Cc: Marshall Rankowitz <mmrankowitz@gmail.com> Subject: HD Portola – Frank Sinatra project. Mimecast Attachment Protection was unable to create safe copies of your attachments. My husband, Marshall, & I are residents of The Retreat. We are strongly opposed to the dense, three story apartment complex being planned for the vacant lot on the corner of Frank Sinatra and Portola. We are in complete agreement with the two attached letters which you received from our neighbors, Don & Lisa Mess and Jeff & Cam Cameron. We hope that the council will take into consideration the negative impact this proposed project will have on the residents of The Retreat and our neighbors on living on Frank Sinatra. Marshall & Cynthia Rankowitz 102 Retreat Circle Sent from AT&T Yahoo Mail for iPad Page 104 of 118 From:Doug Hoekstra To:Kevin Swartz Subject:For Consideration Date:Monday, August 22, 2022 8:30:12 PM To: Kevin Swartz Thank you for taking time in the meetings to explain the proposed Hayes Dietrich development along Portola in Palm Desert. We have three main concerns regarding the development: · The obstruction of the beautiful Mountain View’s · The landscaping and esthetics of the development along Portola and Frank Sinatra · The impact on traffic flow and safety We had been looking to buy a second home in Palm Desert or the surrounding area for several years to get away from the long winters in Minnesota. One of the comments we consistently made during our search was that we appreciated that buildings in the area were mostly 1-2 stories, and that the area really preserved the wonderful views. In our visit last year we found the Retreat which we thought was perfect. We made an offer on one of the units which had wonderful views of the mountains. Unfortunately, we were not successful in acquiring this property. In January of this year, we acquired a unit in the Retreat which has views to the southeast, south, southwest and west. The views were described as “stunning” by our realtor, which they really are. To say that these views to the west will potentially be impacted by a three story apartment complex is extremely disappointing is an understatement. If we owned a unit along Portola, which we almost did and many of our neighbors do, it would be more disappointing. We understand the need for development, but would ask the Developer and City to reconsider making this a 3 story complex, as it will obstruct views of many and completely change the feel of the neighborhood. Regarding the landscape, we ask that the Developer and City ensure that the landscape and sidewalks is commensurate with the look around the Retreat and Desert Willow Country Club. This is such a beautiful area, developments should be held to the same standard. Less concrete and more trees, plants and flowers. Also, moving the Power Lines along Portola underground would go a long way in making the street look like other main streets in the area and also a current modern city. Regarding traffic, I am sure with that many units the impact from the traffic will be significant. Anything to reduce the impact of the traffic and the resulting noise, whether it is adding more trees or plants, increasing the wall height, I hope is being considered. Also, given that an additional 1,000 people will be added to the immediate area, I hope the city is addressing potential safety concerns for the surrounding areas including the Retreat. The fact that a portion of the residents at the new development could potentially be shorter rentals is of concern, especially since we are not at our property year around. Again thanks for holding the meetings and for listening to our feedback and specific concerns. Page 105 of 118 If you would like to discuss further, please let me know. Doug Hoekstra 1504 Retreat Circle 763-257-2131 Page 106 of 118 From:CouncilMeeting Comments To:Melissa Sass Cc:Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone Subject:RE: Opposition to Proposed Complex at Frank Sinatra and Portola Date:Tuesday, August 23, 2022 9:41:13 AM Good morning Mr. and Mrs. Sass, Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of the public record. Kind regards, Niamh M. Ortega Deputy City Clerk Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487 nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org From: Melissa Sass <nguyenm22@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 12:02 AM To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org> Subject: Opposition to Proposed Complex at Frank Sinatra and Portola From: Aaron and Melissa Sass 2204 Retreat Circle Palm Desert The Retreat at Desert Willow Dear Council and Commission members, We are homeowners at the Retreat at Desert Willow, the quiet, gated community on Portola, near Frank Sinatra. Our community is a wonderful balance of neighbors and natural space. Our complex is located right across the street from the proposed high density apartment complex at Frank Sinatra and Portola. As homeowners who will be directly impacted by the proposed complex, we would like to state our opposition. While we understand an apartment complex may be within the PR-22 Zoning of the land, we are concerned about the increase in traffic and residents without the infrastructure to support the addition. Typically, PR-22 zoning is nearer to commercial areas and/or public transportation, which are not features of the identified land. Instead, this location is near PR-5 and PR-8 communities. We also have not seen additional traffic, parking, and noise studies that support the addition of this proposed high density housing. What would be the impacts to water, sewage, and streets in the area? In addition, the proposed three-story buildings do not integrate into the surrounding areas of one and two story homes, but instead create a disjointed flow to the community. We also have concerns that the increase in crowds and changing landscape of the area will negatively impact property values in homes that we have already significantly invested in. Page 107 of 118 While we are not wholly opposed to new construction the area, our concerns specifically lie with the high density housing as currently proposed. We appreciate your time and consideration of our concerns. Sincerely, Aaron and Melissa Sass Page 108 of 118 From:CouncilMeeting Comments To:Art Sanchez Cc:Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone Subject:RE: HD Portola - Frank Sinatra Apartment Project Date:Tuesday, August 23, 2022 9:42:04 AM Good morning Mr. Sanchez, Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of the public record. Kind regards, Niamh M. Ortega Deputy City Clerk Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487 nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org From: Art Sanchez <artsanchez@live.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 8:15 AM To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org> Cc: Art Sanchez <artsanchez@live.com> Subject: HD Portola - Frank Sinatra Apartment Project Good Morning, We are residents at “The Retreat at Desert Willow” We strongly oppose the high density, 3-story, apartment complex proposed to be built at Frank Sinatra and Portola for the following reasons: 1. The beautiful mountain views to the west, will be obstructed, due to a 3-story profile of the structures and mass of the complex. Our development sits at 2 stories. 2. Extremely high-density housing inconsistent with the existing residential communities in the area. 3. With a negative impact on traffic, noise level will increase impacting the surrounding quiet communities. The entrance is to the property of 300+ units is directly across from our residences where it may be better suited along Frank Sinatra. 3. As the complex piers down into neighboring yards, there will be an Invasion of privacy or the lack of to exciting residences. Page 109 of 118 4. Devalues the luxury surrounding communities, with obstruction of views, and lack of serenity. These boxy 3 story buildings are inconsistent in height with the existing luxury housing surrounding the area. Desert Willow Golf Course and resort-style communities already exist in that intersection. 5. Noise levels from this 300+ complex may also impact the serenity of the Desert Willow golf course, the players edge. 6. The set back from the street is not adequate, and the project is too congested. Appears to be a lack of or no walls for sound mitigation in the project. 7. Such a large apartment complex would create a transient community of perhaps 600 plus people surrounded by an otherwise stable population, and require much more city resources, and water usage in an environment where we need to reduce usages. Please deny this project in its current form as presented, perhaps a lessor number of units, or perhaps 2 stories, could be proposed for all of the serious concerns identified. Respectfully, Arthur Sanchez 1903 Retreat Circle Palm Desert, CA 92260 Page 110 of 118 From:CouncilMeeting Comments To:Monica Bury Cc:Kevin Swartz; Rosie Lua; Richard Cannone Subject:RE: 3-story, 395 unit apartment complex by developer Hayes Dietrich at the southwest corner of Portola and Frank Sinatra Date:Tuesday, August 23, 2022 9:42:57 AM Good morning Ms. Bury and Ms. Angster, Thank you for your e-mail. It has been shared with Planning department staff and will be distributed to the City Council in advance of Thursday's City Council meeting. It will also be included as part of the public record. Kind regards, Niamh M. Ortega Deputy City Clerk Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6487 nortega@cityofpalmdesert.org From: Monica Bury <mbury76@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 8:54 AM To: CouncilMeeting Comments <CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org> Subject: 3-story, 395 unit apartment complex by developer Hayes Dietrich at the southwest corner of Portola and Frank Sinatra We have enjoyed quiet and tranquil living at the Retreat at Desert Willow for 4 years. We love our home, our community, the views and the tranquility. We would very much like to continue to live here and keep the peace and tranquility. However this proposed project would destroy what we bought into. Below is an excerpt from a letter to the City Council from our neighbors, Don and Lisa Mess, 804 Retreat Cir.. They have clearly laid out all the problems and concerns for our community. Please give you thoughtful consideration to all the points listed below. All the residents of The Retreat have these same concerns. As residents of Palm Desert, we want to voice our objections to the 3-story, 395 unit apartment complex that developer Hayes Dietrich is proposing to build across the street from our community. The proposed project location is the southwest corner of Portola and Frank Sinatra. Our objections to the project as proposed are based on numerous reasons: 1. Neighborhood Changes: Our neighborhood, The Retreat at Desert Willow, consists of 112 units on 15 acres. The proposed complex is 395 units on 18 acres. Although the recently changed zoning for that property allows 22 units per acre, installing a development such as that within an area which is primarily 12 units per acre, is a drastic shift in our community. It will change the entire dynamic of Page 111 of 118 the desert community that we love. 2. Detrimental Noise: A high-density housing complex would alter the quiet enjoyment that we relish in this neighborhood. The introduction of high density housing project would significantly increase the amount of street traffic and noise that we currently encounter. There are 671 parking spaces planned for the project. That is a variance from the current required parking spaces for this type of development which is 2 parking spaces per unit. A complex with 395 apartments and 671 parking spaces makes for a very busy and loud project. There are only 78 visitor parking spaces allocated for 395 units. That equates to less than 2% of the population of the complex being able to have visitors at any given time. Where are all the excess visitors going to park? Overflow parking would spill over to residential properties across Frank Sinatra. 3. Traffic: The main entrance to the development is planned to be located almost directly across from The Retreat at Desert Willow. Our homeowners that face Portola will be subjected to car headlights being directed straight toward their homes in addition to the increased street traffic. Can exiting the project on Portola will only be allowed to turn right. This means that the number of U- turns made on Portola, next to the Desert Willow Golf Academy will be very high. The increased risk for motor vehicle collisions will significantly increase. 4. Light Pollution: Lighting standards installed over the vast areas of outdoor parking will impact the Dark Sky Initiative that we all rely upon in this area. It is important to our local wildlife as well as local sky/star watchers. 5. Loss of Views: As the project is currently designed, even though the developer has stated that they have created “view corridors” between the buildings, the obstruction of our beautiful mountain views will be almost complete obliteration. The proposed 3 story apartment buildings are massive and a supposed “view corridor” is a sad excuse for mitigating the views that we will lose. We paid a lot of money for our views when we purchased at The Retreat. Also note that when The Retreat project was approved and construction began, the project property was zoned R-8. There was no way for prospective homebuyers at The Retreat to even begin to think that the city would make such an aggressive change in zoning for this area. For the city to change the zoning from R-8 to R-22 is shocking. We realize the need for growth and the need to develop the property in question, but to do so in such a drastic fashion is not conducive to the area. Homeowners along Frank Sinatra will be subject to complete view loss. A 3 story building will obliterate their south facing views. In addition to the fact that residents on the 3rd floor would have views directly into homes along Frank Sinatra. 6. Design of Project: The developer is trying to sell this as a high-end, upscale residential complex. However, as designed all the building will have exterior staircases. Buildings with exterior staircases are unattractive and in no way say “upscale”. I find it hard to believe that they will be able to charge $4,000/month for a 3-bedroom unit in a building with no elevator. The design as proposed tends to make me think that multiple families will start to share units to cover the “upscale” rent. The only building with elevator service is located in the center of the complex. 7. Property Perimeter: As currently designed, the project has only vertical slat fencing to surround the property. This will do nothing to mitigate noise and car headlights. The actual distance between Page 112 of 118 the street and fence line is quite narrow. It has been stated that the developer will install a meandering sidewalk around the property. However, the drawings that we have been shown that installing a sidewalk will be quite tight on space. 8. Property Value Loss: The installation of a high density housing project across the street from The Retreat at Desert Willow and neighboring homes bordering Frank Sinatra will have a detrimental effect on area home values. The City of Palm Desert should be applying transitional land use management practices. Permitting the installation of a 395 unit, high density apartment complex next to low density neighborhoods will have a negative impact on our property values. In summary, the proposed project may be a “nice apartment complex”, but it is not right for the proposed location and neighborhood. It needs to be built in an area more conducive to apartment complexes. We moved to this quiet neighborhood for specific reasons, and sadly, the introduction of a massive high density housing project directly across the street will be a detriment to our community. Monica Bury and Gwendolyn Angster 1102 Retreat Circle Palm Desert, CA 92260 Page 113 of 118 From:Gary Sheneman To:Kevin Swartz Subject:Opposed to Hayes-Dietrich Proposed Apartment Complex Date:Wednesday, August 24, 2022 6:42:31 AM Attachments:We sent you safe versions of your files.msg HD Project - Objection.pdf Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. To: The City of Palm Desert City Council From: Gary and Mary Sheneman As opposed to being redundant I have attached a letter sent to you by Don & Lisa Mess concerning their objections to the proposed apartment complex across from the The Retreat. Their points for objecting to the project are spot on and Mary and I both agree with what they have outlined 100%. When we bought our condo at The Retreat we fully realized that at some point the lot across the street at Portola and Frank Sinatra would be developed at some point. The expectation was that a value added community (high end homes) would be built befitting the Palm Desert neighborhood that it is in. No one would have imagined a 3 story 395 unit apartment complex which will have a negative impact on views, traffic, noise, property values and etc. We are all for growth in Palm Desert that adds value to the neighborhood but not growth that detracts as this project will. I would appreciate the Council refusing the request to build this high-density apartment complex. Thanks Gary & Mary Sheneman 203 Retreat Circle Palm Desert, CA. Page 114 of 118 From:Cam Cameron To:Kevin Swartz Subject:Fwd: Opposition to the proposed project at Portola and Frank Sinatra Date:Sunday, September 4, 2022 12:20:06 PM Kevin: We sent this to City Council over the weekend. Cam Cameron Begin forwarded message: From: Cam Cameron <camrn2@yahoo.com> Date: September 4, 2022 at 11:26:13 PDT To: CouncilMeetingComments@cityofpalmdesert.org Subject: Opposition to the proposed project at Portola and Frank Sinatra To: Members of the City Council of Palm Desert of Palm Springs From: Jeffrey and Cameron Cameron 2601 Retreat Circle Palm Desert Ca 92260 Council: This is our second letter to you regarding this project. After attending the Planning Department Community Meeting, hosted to discuss the proposed development of the 394 unit high density apartment complex at Portola and Frank Sinatra, on September 1st at 5:30, we feel it necessary to emphasis a few more important points: 1. Our complex, The Retreat at Desert Willow, is directly across the street on Portola. When our project was approved for development, the property in question was zoned for R-8 . It was changed to R-22 after our construction was approved and began in 2017. As new buyers, none of us were made aware of this change. (Our builder may not have known of this density change across the street.) 2. All original buyers at The Retreat were charged SUBSTANTIAL premium fees for our views ranging from $40,000 to over $150,000 added to our purchase price. These were for golf course and mountain and pool views. These added prices became part of our purchase price. These higher prices added to the property tax base and translates to higher fees collected by the City of Palm Desert. Essentially, what we paid extra for, and continue to pay taxes on, will now be eliminated for many of our homeowners. All of us with west mountain views stand to have those wiped out by this three story project. Views we paid for!!! Page 115 of 118 3. I (Cam) am a retired registered nurse. It is mentioned that all but one of the buildings will have exterior stairs and no elevators. These are proposed 3 story buildings. How does this meet current ADA needs? Families with small children, people with disabilities, and the elderly will have a very difficult, if not impossible, time negotiating stairs to the upper floors. 4. According to the elevations that we have seen, there will be balconies on the back side of the buildings facing both Portola and Frank Sinatra Dr. Obviously those balconies will be open to view by the passing motoring public and more importantly by the residents of the surrounding properties. No doubt those balconies and whatever is on them will be unsightly, not to mention a platform for looking down upon the adjacent neighborhoods. We strongly urge you to deny this project as proposed and reconsider the zoning on the small parcel of land. We argue that this particular property is not appropriate for R-22 designation. In particular, apartment dwelling. Such a large apartment complex will undoubtedly attract a more transient population by its very nature situated in an otherwise stable owner-residential community. Condominiums in our complex have recently sold for over a million dollars with the mountain views that will be blocked by that construction. We welcome a scaled down single family home project or at most a two story less dense project on that property. Ideally, a park would be perfect! We invite you to visit us any time to see for yourself the impact this proposed project will have on our community. Thank you for your consideration, Cam and Jeff Cameron Page 116 of 118 To: The City of Palm Desert City Council From: Don & Lisa Mess - 804 Retreat Circle, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Date: August 19, 2022 RE: Hayes-Dietrich Proposed Apartment Complex Project As residents of Palm Desert, we want to voice our objections to the 3-story, 395 unit apartment complex that developer Hayes Dietrich is proposing to build across the street from our community. The proposed project location is the southwest corner of Portola and Frank Sinatra. Our objections to the project as proposed are based on numerous reasons: 1. Neighborhood Changes: Our neighborhood, The Retreat at Desert Willow, consists of 112 units on 15 acres. The proposed complex is 395 units on 18 acres. Although the recently changed zoning for that property allows 22 units per acre, installing a development such as that within an area which is primarily 12 units per acre, is a drastic shift in our community. It will change the entire dynamic of the desert community that we love. 2. Detrimental Noise: A high-density housing complex would alter the quiet enjoyment that we relish in this neighborhood. The introduction of high density housing project would significantly increase the amount of street traffic and noise that we currently encounter. There are 671 parking spaces planned for the project. That is a variance from the current required parking spaces for this type of development which is 2 parking spaces per unit. A complex with 395 apartments and 671 parking spaces makes for a very busy and loud project. There are only 78 visitor parking spaces allocated for 395 units. That equates to less than 2% of the population of the complex being able to have visitors at any given time. Where are all the excess visitors going to park? Overflow parking would spill over to residential properties across Frank Sinatra. 3. Traffic: The main entrance to the development is planned to be located almost directly across from The Retreat at Desert Willow. Our homeowners that face Portola will be subjected to car headlights being directed straight toward their homes in addition to the increased street traffic. Can exiting the project on Portola will only be allowed to turn right. This means that the number of U-turns made on Portola, next to the Desert Willow Golf Academy will be very high. The increased risk for motor vehicle collisions will significantly increase. 4. Light Pollution: Lighting standards installed over the vast areas of outdoor parking will impact the Dark Sky Initiative that we all rely upon in this area. It is important to our local wildlife as well as local sky/star watchers. 5. Loss of Views: As the project is currently designed, even though the developer has stated that they have created “view corridors” between the buildings, the obstruction of our beautiful mountain views will be almost complete obliteration. The proposed 3 story apartment buildings are massive and a supposed “view corridor” is a sad excuse for mitigating the views that we will lose. We paid a lot of money for our views when we purchased at The Retreat. Also note that Page 117 of 118 when The Retreat project was approved and construction began, the project property was zoned R-8. There was no way for prospective homebuyers at The Retreat to even begin to think that the city would make such an aggressive change in zoning for this area. For the city to change the zoning from R-8 to R-22 is shocking. We realize the need for growth and the need to develop the property in question, but to do so in such a drastic fashion is not conducive to the area. Homeowners along Frank Sinatra will be subject to complete view loss. A 3 story building will obliterate their south facing views. In addition to the fact that residents on the 3rd floor would have views directly into homes along Frank Sinatra. 6. Design of Project: The developer is trying to sell this as a high-end, upscale residential complex. However, as designed all the building will have exterior staircases. Buildings with exterior staircases are unattractive and in no way say “upscale”. I find it hard to believe that they will be able to charge $4,000/month for a 3-bedroom unit in a building with no elevator. The design as proposed tends to make me think that multiple families will start to share units to cover the “upscale” rent. The only building with elevator service is located in the center of the complex. 7. Property Perimeter: As currently designed, the project has only vertical slat fencing to surround the property. This will do nothing to mitigate noise and car headlights. The actual distance between the street and fence line is quite narrow. It has been stated that the developer will install a meandering sidewalk around the property. However, the drawings that we have been shown that installing a sidewalk will be quite tight on space. 8. Property Value Loss: The installation of a high density housing project across the street from The Retreat at Desert Willow and neighboring homes bordering Frank Sinatra will have a detrimental effect on area home values. The City of Palm Desert should be applying transitional land use management practices. Permitting the installation of a 395 unit, high density apartment complex next to low density neighborhoods will have a negative impact on our property values. In summary, the proposed project may be a “nice apartment complex”, but it is not right for the proposed location and neighborhood. It needs to be built in an area more conducive to apartment complexes. We moved to this quiet neighborhood for specific reasons, and sadly, the introduction of a massive high density housing project directly across the street will be a detriment to our community. Page 118 of 118 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Senior Planner Date: October 25, 2022 Case No.: MISC 22-0009 Subject: Consideration of a design review for a new front entry façade modification and minor addition to the Palm Desert Community Center located at 43900 San Pablo Avenue. BACKGROUND In 1988, the City and Desert Recreation District (DRD) then known as the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District entered into a lease agreement to occupy the Palm Desert Community Center (PDCC), a 20,700 square-foot building, as well as other facilities and parking areas located within the Civic Center Park. On April 26, 2022, the applicant, DRD appeared before the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) with a proposal to construct a new front entry façade improvement with an added 1,520 square feet. The item was continued subject to design comments related to the architectural style and design of the front entry façade. On August 30, 2022, DRD presented a revised design to the ARC which incorporated comments from the April 26, 2022, meeting. The ARC voted to continue the item with a 5-0 vote providing the following comments: 1.Applicant shall submit a complete application packet including a clearly defined roof plan. 2.Massing should be prioritized over materials to give definition to the building. 3.Revisit corner detail of stone materials, if available, use prefabricated mitered corners or use different material. 4.Provide consistency for shading elements proposed, including material and placement of supporting structures for awnings. 5.Integrate eyebrows in a more thoughtful manner. A discussion of the applicant response to comment items is summarized on Table 1 of this staff report. Page 1 of 19Page 1 of 19 Page 1 of 19 MISC 22-0009 – Palm Desert Community Center Page 2 of 6 October 25, 2022 Additional commentary which was not included in the motion and did not reflect consensus included: • Consider different placement for proposed stone material. • Stone material at entry should return fully to inside corner. • Directional placement of metal panels should be consistent. • The stone veneer shall wrap at corners and should only terminate where there is a change in building plane or building massing. The final construction plans shall include sufficient detail to demonstrate how the stone veneer will be applied. • Final construction plans shall include a detail indicating the stone veneer will have mitered corners. • Final roof plan shall demonstrate the parapet return of the front entry tower is consistent with the elevations approved by ARC. • Final construction plans shall include a detail showing the stone veneer columns shall project a minimum of 0’-8” from the building fascia to be consistent with the elevations approved by ARC. • Cornice detail does not fit with proposed design. PROJECT SUMMARY DRD is proposing to construct a new front entry façade improvement on an existing building located at 43900 San Pablo Avenue. The façade improvement is a component of an extensive interior remodel to expand and renovate the front lobby, expand the exercise room, activity room, restrooms, locker areas, administration areas, and includes the addition of a catering kitchen. The exterior modifications are subject to design review approval and include: • A 1,520 square-foot building addition located at the main front entry. • Front entry glazing modifications for new windows and main entry. • Addition of a front entry tower • Extended roof lines for shading • The façade is to match the body of the existing building colors and add in a new color for trims and awning/shade structures. The table below illustrates the Applicant’s revisions to the exterior elevations in response to ARC comments: Table 1 – Response to ARC Design Comments ARC Comment Design Response Applicant shall submit a complete application packet including a clearly defined roof plan. The applicant has provided an updated plan set which includes the minimum submittal requirements for the design review application. The plans include a roof plan found on sheet ARB140. The roof plan Page 2 of 19Page 2 of 19 Page 2 of 19 MISC 22-0009 – Palm Desert Community Center Page 3 of 6 October 25, 2022 identifies the height of all proposed parapets on the addition area, the roof height, and shows the location of interior drains. Massing should be prioritized over materials to give definition to the building; The applicant has removed exterior stone cladding in favor of a simplified stucco finish with cement panel around windows. Revisit corner detail of stone materials, if available, use prefabricated mitered corners or use different material The exterior stone has been removed and replaced with stucco. Provide consistency for shading elements proposed, including material and placement of supporting structures for awnings. The shade elements from the previous design have been removed. Integrate eyebrows in a more thoughtful manner. No eyebrows are proposed. Page 3 of 19Page 3 of 19 Page 3 of 19 MISC 22-0009 – Palm Desert Community Center Page 4 of 6 October 25, 2022 Additional Project Details: No proposal has been presented to paint the main building, therefore, the existing color of the building and split face block façade remains as is. The two existing planters will be removed and replaced with low planters as shown on the site plan. The existing trees in proximity to the façade entry have been verified by the architect that they do not interfere with the new window canopies. In addition, no landscaping changes are proposed since the addition does not affect the existing landscaping. ANALYSIS Development Standards The project is subject to the development standards set forth by the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) for the Public/Institutional (P) Zone. No changes are proposed to the site plan, landscape plan, or overall parking facilities. The new entry proposal has a height of 20 feet, 2 inches, which is under the allowed maximum of 35 feet in the P zone. Table 2 below outlines the project’s zoning conformance analysis. Table 2 Zoning Conformance STANDARD P ZONE PROJECT CONFORMS Height 35’-0” 20’-2” (New Entry) Yes Lot Coverage - - N/A Parking 8 Spaces per 1,000 square feet 1.84 spaces per unit Yes ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY Findings for Architectural Review Commission (ARC) decisions of design review applications are listed under Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.68.040 as follows: A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. The proposed project is in conformance with the legally adopted development standards set forth by the PDMC for the Public zoning district. A summary of the conformance with these development standards are analyzed above. As summarized, the project conforms with all applicable standards of the code. B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it Page 4 of 19Page 4 of 19 Page 4 of 19 MISC 22-0009 – Palm Desert Community Center Page 5 of 6 October 25, 2022 will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. The proposed design continues to be compatible with surrounding developments in the public facility and the proposed development will not create additional traffic which would impair investment in the neighborhood. The revision to the architecture is equivalent in character and quality to the original approval and does not adversely impact surrounding developments. C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the General Plan of the City. The proposed project continues to be compatible with the development pattern within the Civic Center Park and harmonious in character to the surrounding area. The land use designation is Public Facility/Institutional District in the General Plan which promotes public facilities including community centers. Land Use Policy No. 4.10 (Civic identity) encourages public places to be designed to provide locations that reinforce community identity. The proposed building renovations creates a sense of space and interest to the Civic Center Park. D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. The proposed project utilizes a good composition of new materials, textures, and colors for quality visual aesthetics, enhancing the front entry with consideration of the compatibility to the existing building. E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. The proposed project conforms with legally adopted development standards set forth by the Public/Institution Zoning District. A summary of the conformance with these development standards are outlined on page 4 of this report. F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project did not modify the originally designed site plan which included hard surface pedestrian pathways and connections from the public right- of-way. In addition, the overall building design does not present any adverse impacts to the protection of public health, safety, and general welfare. Page 5 of 19Page 5 of 19 Page 5 of 19 MISC 22-0009 – Palm Desert Community Center Page 6 of 6 October 25, 2022 Staff Recommendation Staff finds that the criteria of the design review has been met and the proposal is compatible with the existing building, therefore, recommends approval of the project. Staff further recommends that any exceptions or modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval. Attachment: 1. Plans Submitted by Applicant. 2. Notice of Action dated September 12, 2022. Page 6 of 19Page 6 of 19 Page 6 of 19 CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc.Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB001 COVER SHEET CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 43900 SAN PABLO AVE PALM DESERT, CA 92260 SHEET NO.SHEET NAME ARB ARB001 COVER SHEET ARB002 EXISTING BUILDING IMAGES ARB100 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN ARB110 REMODELED FLOOR PLAN ARB140 REMODELED ROOF PLAN ARB200 REMODELED ELEVATIONS ARB201 REMODELED ENLARGED ELEVATIONS ARB300 REMODELED SECTIONS ARB500 PROPOSED ENTRY RENDER ARB501 PROPOSED ENTRY RENDER ARB600 MATERIALS BOARD 11 GRAND TOTAL: 11 Page 7 of 19Page 7 of 19 Page 7 of 19 CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc.Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB002 EXISTING BUILDING IMAGES CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 MAIN ENTRY WEST PERSPECTIVEWEST PERSPECTIVE SOUTH PERSPECTIVE MAIN ENTRY Page 8 of 19Page 8 of 19 Page 8 of 19 (E) PARKING (E) RECREATION CENTER (E) CIVIC CENTER DOG PARK (E) CIVIC CENTER SKATE PARK (E) CIVIC CENTER TENNIS COURTS (E) YMCASAN PABLO AVE.SAN PABLO AVE.TYP. (E) 16 PARKING SPACES (E) 16 PARKING SPACES (E) 12 PARKING SPACES (E) 12 PARKING SPACES (E) 12 PARKING SPACES (E) 12 PARKING SPACES (E) 12 PARKING SPACES (E) 12 PARKING SPACES (E) 12 PARKING SPACES (E) 13 PARKING SPACES (E) 12 PARKING SPACES (E) 7 PARKING SPACES (E) 6 PARKING SPACES (E) 7 PARKING SPACES (E) 7 PARKING SPACES (E) 15 PARKING SPACES (E) 6 PARKING SPACES (E) 11 PARKING SPACES (E) 4 PARKING SPACES (E) 12 PARKING SPACES(E) 12 PARKING SPACES 22,347 S.F. (N) ADDITION ________________________________________________________________________________________________ - - ________________________________________________________________________________________________ - - CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc. 1" = 30'-0"Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB100 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 1" = 30'-0" OVERALL SITE PLAN1 North • • • Zoning: Public APN: 622250016 Parcel Area: 0.610 Acres Parking Spaces Standard 221 Accessible 007 Total 228 SCOPE OF WORK Page 9 of 19Page 9 of 19 Page 9 of 19 1 ARB300________________________________________________ 2 ARB300________________________________________________R18'-0"R20'-0"90°90° (N) EXERCISE ROOM 102 1,311 SF (N) LOBBY 101 1,072 SF (N) ACTIVITY ROOM 104 941 SF (N) RECEPTION 103 220 SF (N) BREAK ROOM 115 166 SF (N) ADMINISTRATION 109 583 SF (N) OFFICE 114 111 SF (N) OFFICE 113 110 SF (N) I.T. ROOM 110 58 SF (E) COMMUNITY ROOM 116 2,894 SF (N) CATERING KITCHEN 120 455 SF (E) ELECTRICAL 123 117 SF (E) GYM FOYER 108 95 SF (E) MECHANICAL 137 97 SF (E) JANITOR 106 44 SF (E) BLEACHER STORAGE 127 371 SF (N) CORRIDOR 142 261 SF (E) STORAGE12535 SF(E) STORAGE12635 SF(E) STORAGE 117 75 SF (E) STORAGE 118 74 SF (E) STORAGE12930 SF(E) STORAGE12830 SF(E) GYMNASIUM 124 7,371 SF (E) RACQUETBALL #1 130 804 SF (E) RACQUETBALL #2 131 802 SF (E) OFFICE 132 675 SF (N) WOMEN'S RR 105 352 SF (N) MEN'S RR 107 383 SF (N) WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM 105A 125 SF (N) WOMEN'S SHOWER 105B 71 SF (N) MEN'S LOCKER ROOM 107A 139 SF (N) MEN'S SHOWER 107B 94 SF 7'-0"3'-0" 7'-0"8'-0"7'-0"1'-4"10'-0"10'-0"7'-0"3'-7"8'-0"18'-4"STORAGE 134 104 SF (E) RESTROOM 136 78 SF (E) OFFICE 1354'-8"1'-2"8'-0"1'-2"10'-10"1'-2"8'-0"35'-6"(E) STORAGE 133 43 SF (E) STORAGE 119 35 SF F.E.C.F.E.C.F.E.C. 8'-5"2'-4"6"12'-8"6"2'-4"USE AND OCCUPANCY ACTIVITY ENTRY KITCHEN MULTI-PURPOSE NOT IN SCOPE OFFICE RESTROOM SPORT STORAGE SUPPORT 26'-8" CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc. 1/8" = 1'-0"Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB110 REMODELED FLOOR PLAN CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 1/8" = 1'-0" REMODELED FLOOR PLAN1 North DEMO AREA Page 10 of 19Page 10 of 19 Page 10 of 19 T.O. PARAPET 17'-0" T.O. PARAPET 20'-2 1/2"1/4" / 12"1/ 4 " / 1 2 "1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4 " / 12 "1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4 " / 12 "1/4" / 12"1/4 " / 12 " 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"15/16" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1 ARB300________________________________________________ 2 ARB300________________________________________________ 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"44'-2"34'-9"T.O. PARAPET 14'-6" T.O. PARAPET 14'-6" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"RIDGET.O. PARAPET 14'-6" T.O. PARAPET 14'-6"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12" 45'-1"34'-9" 4'-0" T.O. PARAPET 14'-6" T.O. PARAPET 17'-0" T.O. PARAPET 22'-2 1/2" T.O. PARAPET 17'-0" T.O. WALL 14'-6" T.O. JOIST 14'-5"R21'-3"4'-0"4'-0"4'-0"4'-0"4'-0"CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc. 1/8" = 1'-0"Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB140 REMODELED ROOF PLAN CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 1/8" = 1'-0" REMODELED ROOF PLAN1 North (N) ROOF MECHANICAL WELL DEMO AREA Page 11 of 19Page 11 of 19 Page 11 of 19 30'-2 1/2" 24'-2 1/2" 22'-2 1/2" FINISH FLOOR 0'-0" 18'-2" T.O. PARAPET 14'-6" T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET 30'-2 1/2" 24'-2 1/2" FINISH FLOOR 0'-0" 20'-2" 18'-2" T.O. PARAPET 14'-6" T.O. PARAPET 20'-2 1/2" T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET 22'-2 1/2" CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc. 1/8" = 1'-0"Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB200 REMODELED ELEVATIONS CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 1/8" = 1'-0" PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION1 1/8" = 1'-0" PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION2 Page 12 of 19Page 12 of 19 Page 12 of 19 FINISH FLOOR 0'-0" 20'-2" T.O. PARAPET 14'-6" 18'-2" T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET 22'-2 1/2" T.O. PARAPET T.O. WINDOW 9'-0" B.O. WINDOW 3'-0" 30'-2 1/2" 24'-2 1/2" 22'-2 1/2" FINISH FLOOR 0'-0" 18'-2" T.O. PARAPET 14'-6" T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET T.O. WIINDOW 9'-0" B.O. WIINDOW 3'-0" CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc. 1/4" = 1'-0"Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB201 REMODELED ENLARGED ELEVATIONS CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED ENLARGED SOUTH ELEVATION2 1/4" = 1'-0" PROPOSED ENLARGED WEST ELEVATION1 Page 13 of 19Page 13 of 19 Page 13 of 19 2 ARB300________________________________________________ (N) MEN'S RR 107 383 SF (N) MEN'S LOCKER ROOM 107A 139 SF T.O. PARAPET 30'-2 1/2" T.O. PARAPET 22'-2 1/2" FINISH FLOOR 0" B.O. FINISH CEILING 9'-0" T.O. DECK 16'-6" 1 ARB300________________________________________________ (N) ACTIVITY ROOM 104 941 SF T.O. PARAPET 24'-2 1/2" (E) MECHANICAL 137 97 SF (N) WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM 105A 125 SF (N) WOMEN'S SHOWER 105B 71 SF (N) MEN'S SHOWER 107B 94 SF (N) MEN'S LOCKER ROOM 107A 139 SF T.O.P 22'-2 1/2" T.O. DECK 16'-6 3/4" B.O. FINISH CEILING 9'-0" T.O. DECK 15'-6 3/4" B.O. PARAPET 11'-2" T.O. PARAPET 14'-6" B.O. WINDOW 3'-0" T.O. WINDOW 9'-0" FINISH FLOOR 0" CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc. 1/4" = 1'-0"Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB300 REMODELED SECTIONS CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTION - MEN'S RR TO MEN'S LOCKER1 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTION - MEN'S LOCKER TO ACTIVITY2 Page 14 of 19Page 14 of 19 Page 14 of 19 CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc.Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB500 PROPOSED ENTRY RENDER CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 Page 15 of 19Page 15 of 19 Page 15 of 19 CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc.Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB501 PROPOSED ENTRY RENDER CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 Page 16 of 19Page 16 of 19 Page 16 of 19 CLIENT: ARCHITECT: HOLT ARCHITECTURE36951 COOK STREET, STE. 103, PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH: 760.328.5280 2300 MARKET STREET, STE. 140, RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 PH: 951.462.1451 Scale: Date:© 2018 Holt Architects, Inc.Autodesk Docs://DRD - Palm Desert Community Center/R20_DRD Master File.rvtARB600 MATERIALS BOARD CITY OF PALM DESERT PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CENTER 10/25/22 43900 San Pablo Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 PROPOSED MATERIALS Page 17 of 19Page 17 of 19 Page 17 of 19 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOTICE OF ACTION September 12, 2022 Mr. Troy Strange Desert Recreation District 45305 Oasis Street Indio, CA 92201 Subject: MISC22-0009 - Consideration to approve a request for a new front entry façade modification and minor addition to the Palm Desert Community Center located within the Civic Center Park. The Architectural Review Commission of the City of Palm Desert considered your request and took the following action at its special meeting of August 30, 2022: A motion for continuance was made by Vice Chair McIntosh, seconded by Commissioner Latkovic, and carried by a 5-0 vote of the Commission. During deliberations, Commissioners’ offered commentary as follows: 1) Applicant shall submit a complete application packet including a clearly defined roof plan; 2) Massing should be prioritized over materials to give definition to the building; 3) Revisit corner detail of stone materials, if available, use pre-fabricated mitered corners or use different material; 4) Provide consistency for shading elements proposed, including material and placement of supporting structures for awnings; and 5) Integrate eyebrows in a more thoughtful manner. (AYES: Colvard, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None). Individual Commissioner’s offered additional commentary as follows. The points below do not necessarily reflect consensus: • Consider different placement for proposed stone material. • Stone material at entry should return fully to inside corner. • Directional placement of metal panels should be consistent. • The stone veneer shall wrap at corners and should only terminate where there is a change in building plane or building massing. The final construction plans shall include sufficient detail to demonstrate how the stone veneer will be applied. • Final construction plans shall include a detail indicating the stone veneer will have mitered corners. Page 18 of 19Page 18 of 19 Page 18 of 19 • Final roof plan shall demonstrate the parapet return of the front entry tower is consistent with the elevations approved by ARC. • Final construction plans shall include a detail showing the stone veneer columns shall project a minimum of 0’-8” from the building fascia to be consistent with the elevations approved by ARC. • Cornice detail does not fit with proposed design. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within 15 days of the date of the decision. If you have any questions, please contact Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, at (760) 776-6479 or nmelloni@cityofpalmdesert.org. Sincerely, ROSIE LUA, SECRETARY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION cc: File Page 19 of 19Page 19 of 19 Page 19 of 19 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission From: Nick Melloni, Senior Planner Date: October 25, 2022 Case No: PP/EA 22-0005 Subject: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan and Environmental Assessment to construct a 53,604 square-foot, single-story personal storage building on a 1.87-acre site located at the northwest corner of Dinah Shore Drive and Dick Kelly Drive (APNs: 694-240-009, 0010, and 021). BACKGROUND On April 8, 2022, the project applicant, Scott A. Mommer Consulting, submitted applications to the Palm Desert Planning Division for a Precise Plan (PP), Environmental Assessment (EA), and Parcel Map Waiver (PMW) to develop a personal storage facility on behalf of West Coast Self- Storage. On May 10, 2022, Planning staff presented project elevations to the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) for preliminary design comments. The ARC did not take a formal action on the project but provided feedback on the project design. On August 30, 2022, the applicant appeared before the ARC with a revised design which incorporated preliminary comments. The ARC voted to continue the item with a 5-0 vote providing the following comments: 1) Revisit design techniques used to break up overall mass of the building, design should be more cohesive; 2) Remove trellis elements; 3) Revisit central connecting element on south elevation, provide relief or other element to allow design to read as two buildings instead of a continuous building; 4) Provide a suitable alternative for southern live oak; 5) The applicant shall provide a meandering sidewalk and additional landscaping on the Dinah Shore Drive frontage, rather than curb adjacent landscaping, to maintain consistency with existing industrial development along the corridor, while considering vehicular line-of-sight for Dinah Shore Drive and Spyder Circle; 6) The applicant shall provide additional landscape plantings for trees along Dinah Shore Drive and Dick Kelly Drive; 7) The applicant shall provide additional cobble as a part of the landscape plan to provide a variation in texture, soil stabilization, and for resistance to high winds; Page 1 of 39 8) The applicant shall verify that the roof-top units on the western portion of the building are fully screened with consideration to the changes in parapet height to ensure there is no visibility from all vantage points; 9) The applicant shall identify the minimum number of landscape plantings for each respective live planting shown on the landscape plan; 10) The proposed exterior wall signage construction, if proposed facing existing residential and/or residentially zoned properties, shall utilize halo-illumination to reduce glare for adjacent residential areas; 11) Roof drainage systems shall be placed within interior walls; 12) Applicant shall provide screening of parking. A discussion of the applicant’s response to comment items is summarized on Table 1 found in this staff report. Additional commentary which was not included in the motion and did not reflect consensus included: • Consider use of landscaping, glazing, or other elements to break up building and to help with transition from residential to commercial. • Variety in architecture is too diverse and does not tie together, use a continuous theme to provide a more cohesive design. PROJECT SUMMARY A. Property Description: The project is located on a vacant 1.87-acre site at the northwest corner of Dinah Shore Drive and Dick Kelly Drive that is comprised of three contiguous parcels (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 694-240-021, 009, and 010). The parcels are Lots 14, 15, and 16 of Parcel Map 24255, originally recorded in 2003. These parcels will be merged into a single parcel under a separate mapping action. The site has been previously rough graded and is surrounded by existing development consisting of light and service industrial uses to the north and single-family residential to the south. This site fronts upon three public streets with right-of-way improvements consisting of street, curb and gutter, and a developed meandering public sidewalk along the southern right-of-way. There is a dedication for a 20’-0” wide landscape and pedestrian easement at the eastern edge of the site along Dinah Shore Drive. The topography of the site is generally flat, sloping from west to east. B. Zoning and General Plan Designation: Zone: Service Industrial (SI) General Plan: Employment C. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use: North: SI – Service industrial uses South: Planned Residential22 (PR-22) – Vacant land East: SI – Vacant Land West: SI – Vacant Land Page 2 of 39 Project Description Personal storage facilities are an allowed use within the SI zone with the approval of a PP. The proposed development includes: • Construction of 53,604 square feet of building area for indoor personal storage and 644 square feet for an onsite office for leasing and administration. • Eight (8) onsite parking spaces. • Two (2) truck loading stalls. • Perimeter landscaping improvements. • Off-site improvements including: o Public sidewalks and utility corridors along the project frontage on Dinah Shore Drive. o Public sidewalks and utility corridors along the project frontage on Spyder Circle. o Parkway and utility corridor improvements along the project frontage on Dick Kelly Drive. o Two (2) vehicular access driveways on Spyder Circle. The proposed parcel map waiver application will merge the three (3) existing parcels into one (1) parcel. The merger will be subject to approval by the Planning Commission. Table 1 below illustrates the Applicant’s revisions to the exterior elevations in response to ARC comments: Table 1 – Response to ARC Design Comments ARC Comment Design Response Revisit design techniques used to break up overall mass of the building, design should be more cohesive. Forms have been altered for a more cohesive design. A majority of the alterations have been made to the south façade facing residential to the south. (See Sheet A-3.5) Remove trellis elements. All trellis elements have been removed. Revisit central connecting element on south elevation, provide relief or other element to allow design to read as two buildings instead of a continuous building. This central area has been reduced in height and the setback has been increased by 10’-0” to break up the continuity of buildings along Dick Kelly. The exterior now features a new rough texture for added variation. The additional setback area now features additional landscaping. Provide a suitable alternative for southern live oak. The southern live oak has been removed and replaced with the Prosopis chilenis (Chilean Mesquite) The applicant shall provide a meandering sidewalk and additional landscaping on the Dinah Shore Drive frontage, rather than curb adjacent landscaping, to maintain consistency with existing industrial development along the corridor, while considering vehicular line-of- sight for Dinah Shore Drive and Spyder Circle. The meandering sidewalk has been added to the landscape plan, site plan, and grading plan and is consistent with landscaping found along the Dinah Shore Corridor. Landscaping has been added to both sides of the sidewalk area. Page 3 of 39 The applicant shall provide additional landscape plantings for trees along Dinah Shore Drive and Dick Kelly Drive. A total of eleven (11) trees are proposed along Dinah Shore Drive. A total of twenty-on (21) trees are proposed along Dick Kelly Drive. The applicant shall provide additional cobble as a part of the landscape plan to provide a variation in texture, soil stabilization, and for resistance to high winds. Rock cobble has been added throughout the landscape planter area as directed. The applicant shall verify that the roof-top units on the western portion of the building shall fully screened with consideration to the changes in parapet height to ensure there is no visibility from all vantage points. The applicant has relocated the roof equipment to an area of the roof along the north side of the building where it is screened by a 20’-0” parapet with a roof height of 11’-0”. The lowest adjacent roof at the southern edge of the site is 15’-2” which provides a 4’-2” screen. The applicant shall identify the minimum number of landscape plantings for each respective live planting shown on the landscape plan. Quantities have been added to the landscape plan. The proposed exterior wall signage construction, if proposed facing existing residential and/or residentially zoned properties, shall utilize halo-illumination to reduce glare for adjacent residential areas. Signage is only shown on the renderings along the east and north elevation. Staff recommends adding a condition that signage shall comply with the Palm Desert Municipal Code and shall not include a raceway, backer panel or phone numbers. Roof drainage systems shall be placed within interior walls. The roof plan on Sheet A-5 includes a keynote indicating that the roof drainage will be placed on interior walls. Applicant shall provide screening of parking areas from Spyder Circle by means of low block wall, landscape, or berm. Parking areas are predominantly located out of sight of Spyder Circle. Landscape trees and shrubs are provided to screen the drive aisle on the north edge of the building. The walls of the trash enclosure shall be finished to match the primary building. The trash enclosure utilizes a 6-foot block wall enclosure using tan concrete masonry units (CMU), which are used on the building. Site Plan and Parking The proposed project occupies the majority of the parcel with a lot coverage percentage (lot to building coverage) of 65.7%. The building wall of the structure forms a continuous perimeter along the Dick Kelly Drive and Dinah Shore Drive street-frontages where the building is located at or near the minimum setback. Site access is available by two driveways located on Spyder Circle. The building office is located on the northern elevation near the proposed central site access. Perimeter areas of the site are planted with desert appropriate landscaping. The proposed plan provides eight (8) onsite parking spaces and two (2) 24-foot deep loading stalls for truck traffic. Page 4 of 39 Access and Circulation The site is designed with two vehicular access points on Spyder Circle. The final location of these driveways is still pending review by the Palm Desert Engineering Division and Public Works. The western driveway will be relocated to align with an existing driveway for the development located on the north side of Spyder Circle. The western approach will allow for full turn movements. The eastern driveway will be restricted to right-turn exit movements only. The internal drive aisles are private and provide full turn movements for access to the eight onsite parking spaces. The Applicant has provided turning templates to demonstrate vehicle maneuverability within the drive aisle. A portion of the parking area will be gated for security purposes to allow customers to park and load storage. The site has been designed to provide fire access. No access has been provided on Dick Kelly Drive in order to maintain a continuous frontage for the existing sidewalk area and existing residential properties on the opposite side of the street. Architecture and Screening The 53,604 square foot building is proposed as single-story. The architecture is desert contemporary characterized by: • An exterior color palette consisting of primarily desert tones. • An exterior material palette consisting of stucco (20/30 coarse finish), split-face CMU block, vertical ribbed insulated metal panels, standing-seam metal roof, spandrel glass, and metal awnings. • Flat roof with varying parapet heights. • Building pop-outs. • Tower elements at building corners. • Decorative trellises. The Applicant is proposing roof-mounted HVAC units. Units dedicated to the eastern portion of the building will be screened within the tower element over the onsite office. The units on the western portion of the building are proposed behind the building parapet. Fire riser and electrical utility rooms are provided on the floor plan to ensure utilities are screened. Access doors to these rooms face towards the interior parking area of the site and will not be readily visible from public streets. Landscaping Landscape for the site consists of a mix of desert appropriate live plantings which includes: Trees: • Sweet Acacia, California Fan Palm, Chilean Mesquite, Mexican Blue Palm, and Desert Museum Palo Verde Shrubs/Accents: • Century Plant, Octopus Agave, Centennial Baccharis, Oo-la-la bougainvillea, Mexican Bird of Paradise, Dwarf Bottle Brush, Texas Ranger, and Mexican Bush Sage Page 5 of 39 Ground Cover: • Parry’s Agave, Silver Bush Morning Glory, Trailing Indigo Bush, Red Yucca, Furhmans Red Sage, and Yellow Butterfly Vine Hardscape: • Landscape Boulders and Decomposed Granite Live plantings are located along the perimeter street frontages. The plan identifies the landscape area will use a drip irrigation system. The eastern edge of the site along Dinah Shore Drive is sloped as the building pad will be graded with an elevation approximately 4 feet to 5 feet above the street curb. ANALYSIS Development Standards The project site is zoned SI and allows the development of personal storage as a permitted use with the approval of a Precise Plan by the Palm Desert Planning Commission in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code Section (PDMC) 25.72.030. Development in the SI zone is subject to development standards provided under PDMC 25.16.50. The table below summarizes the project’s conformance analysis. STANDARD SI PROJECT CONFORMS Lot Size, Min. 20,000 square feet 81,457 square feet Yes Front Yard Setback 20’-0” 20’-0” min. (East) Yes Side Yard Setback 0’-0” N/A N/A Street Side Yard Setback 10’-0” 10’-0” min. (South) Yes Rear Yard Setback 0’-0” 13’-1” min. (West) Yes Floor Area Ratio 0.75 0.66 Yes Maximum Height 40’-0” 24’-0” Yes Maximum No. of Stories 3 Stories 1 Story Yes Parking 6 Spaces 8 Spaces Yes Parking Section 25.46.040 Parking Requirements of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) establishes that personal storage facilities are required to provide a minimum of six (6) parking spaces plus an additional two per onsite manager’s unit. The proposal provides a minimum of eight (8) parking spaces onsite. No onsite manager’s units are proposed; therefore, the project exceeds minimum parking requirements. Page 6 of 39 ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY ARC approval is required for all Precise Plan applications per PDMC Section 25.68.020 (A). Findings for ARC decisions are listed under PDMC Section 25.68.040 – Findings of the ARC. Findings in support of the project are listed below: To approve a design review application, the ARC shall find the following: A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards. The proposed development conforms with legally adopted development standards set forth by the Service Industrial zoning designation as established by PDMC 25.16.050. A summary of the conformance with these development standards, including setbacks, floor area ratio, building height, and parking is provided in the above analysis section. As summarized, the project conforms with all applicable development standards. The proposed utilities are screened or within the building in accordance with PDMC 25.40.090. B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. The proposed project is located at the corner of Dick Kelly Drive and Dinah Shore Drive. The project use and building design provide for a transition between commercial and industrial area intended for Employment uses, and residential uses. Personal storage uses are not anticipated to generate nuisance impacts such as excess noise, sound, or odor, in comparison to other light industrial or commercial uses permitted within the Service Industrial zone such as furniture manufacturing, warehousing, and auto repair. The building design does not create openings or storage areas that face upon neighboring residential uses. Additionally, vehicular access points are located upon street frontages facing existing light industrial areas to limit additional traffic hazards or congestion on Dick Kelly Drive and preserve the existing meandering sidewalk for pedestrians. C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the General Plan of the City. The proposed project is compatible with the development pattern within the surrounding area by proposing a single-story personal storage building. The areas to the north of the site are generally industrial and developed with a mix of light industrial and office buildings. The proposed storage building retains the commercial nature and architecture of these existing buildings. The areas to the south of the project site are vacant and reserved for future multi-family apartment development at densities of up to 22 dwelling units per acre. The project scale is appropriate to the scale of the residential uses by maintaining a single- story height and provides a transition by providing a wide landscape buffer for areas which abut the existing residential areas. Page 7 of 39 The proposal implements design goals and policies of the General Plan including: Land Use Policy 2.9 – Preserves continuous sidewalk areas along high-volume traffic corridors, minimizing vehicle intrusions across sidewalks, and screens parking areas by placing them along the lower traffic volume street, Spyder Circle. Land Use Policy 3.16 – The proposed use and building provides an appropriate transition between Employment land use areas and Neighborhood land use areas for residential uses. Land Use Policy 4.6 – Provides for industrial compatibility by locating drive aisles on area separated from residential to minimize impacts to residential development. D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. The proposed design utilizes high-quality finishes and features a quality contemporary style characterized by varying parapet heights, smooth stucco exterior finishes, and desert compatible colors. The buildings provide for a quality visual aesthetic along Dinah Shore Drive and Dick Kelly Drive. The project also includes extensive onsite landscaping along perimeter frontages. E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located and all other applicable requirements. The proposed development conforms with legally adopted development standards for the Service Industrial zoning district. A summary of the conformance with these development standards, including setbacks, lot coverage, building height, open space, and parking is provided on the conformance analysis table on page 6 of this staff report. As summarized, the project conforms with all applicable development standards. The proposed utilities are screened or within the building in accordance with PDMC 25.40.090. F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The preliminary grading plan has been reviewed to ensure the design of the project incorporates the proper improvements including adequately sized retention basins for onsite drainage. In addition, the overall building design ensures the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the findings have been met based on the analysis and approves a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of the Precise Plan application with the following conditions of approval: 1. Signage shall comply with the Palm Desert Municipal Code and not utilize raceways, backers, or phone numbers. 2. The walls of the trash enclosure shall be finished with stucco to match the primary building. Page 8 of 39 3. All roof mounted mechanical equipment should be screened from all vantages of surrounding public areas with consideration to the varying parapet heights. 4. Any modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval. Furthermore, should major design comments arise during the discussion, staff recommends the ARC clearly outline the requested changes and continues the case. Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits from the Applicant. 2. Applicant response to ARC comments 3. Notice of Action September 12, 2022 Page 9 of 39 PROJECT INFORMATIONPROJECT LOCATIONAPPLICANTWEST COAST SELF STORAGE808 134th St SW, Bldg. B, Suite 211Everett, WA 98204t: 818-749-8846CONTACT: JIM FITZPATRICK JFITZPATRICK@WCSELFSTORAGE.COMPROJECT DESCRIPTIONPROPOSED SELF-STORAGE FACILITYASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERAPNAPPLICANT REPRESENTATIVELARS ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.4694 WEST JACQUELYN AVENUEFresno, CA 93722t: 559-276-2790 f: 559-276-0850CONTACT: JANAY MOMMER jmommer@larsandersen.comCIVIL ENGINEER694-240-021, -009, and -010LARS ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.4694 WEST JACQUELYN AVENUEt: 559-276-2790 f: 559-276-0850CONTACT: DANIEL J. ZOLDAK dzoldak@larsandersen.comCS-1A-2A-3A-4A-5C-1C-2COVER SHEETEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSFLOOR PLANROOF PLANGRADING PLANCONTACTSSITE VICINITY MAPSHEET INDEXPROPOSED WEST COAST SELF-STORAGEFORNWC OF DICK KELLY DRIVE AND DINAHSHORE DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260PH-1SITE PHOTOMETRICWQMP PLANA-6SECTIONSNWC OF DICK KELLY DRIVE AND DINAH SHORE DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260Fresno, CA 93722PRECISE PLAN APPLICATIONPH-2LIGHTING CUTSHEETSL-1CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANL-2PLANT PHOTOSPH-3LIGHTING CUTSHEETSA-1 SITE PLANWEST COASTSELF STORAGESM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R E2022-10-10A-7MATERIAL BOARDC-3UTILITY PLANARCHITECTMAGELLAN ARCHITECTURE10540 TALBERT AVE, SUITE 175t: 949-515-9600CONTACT: CHRISTIAN G SERRANO christian@magellanarchitects.comFountain Valley, CA 92708-6027PARCEL A:PARCEL 14 OF PARCEL MAP NO.24255, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OFCALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 206 PAGES 94 THROUGH 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICEOF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.PARCEL B:PARCEL 15 OF PARCEL MAP NO.24255, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OFCALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 206 PAGES 94 THROUGH 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICEOF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.PARCEL C:PARCEL 16 OF PARCEL MAP NO.24255, IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OFCALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 206 PAGES 94 THROUGH 99 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICEOF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.C-1.1GRADING SECTIONSLEGAL DESCRIPTIONPH-4LIGHTING CUTSHEETSA-8DETAILSA-1.1EGRESS PLANA-3.5EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSC-2.1WQMP DETAILSCOVER SHEETCS-1Page 10 of 39 CLCLCLDICK KELLY DRIVESPYDER CIRCLEDINAH SHORE DRIVECLCLCLCONCEPTUAL GRADINGPLAN0TRUE NORTH020 3010240SCALE: 1"=20'-0"WEST COASTSELF STORAGESM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R E2022-10-10CONSTRUCTION SYMBOL NOTES:STORM DRAIN NOTES:GRADING LEGEND AND SYMBOLS:HATCHING LEGEND :ESTIMATED QUANTITIES :C-1VICINITY MAPNSVICINITY MAPNSGRADING ABBREVIATIONS:Page 11 of 39 DINAH SHORE SECTION A-ADICK KELLY DRIVE SECTION B-BSPYDER CIRCLE SECTION C-CSECTION E-ECONCEPTUAL SECTIONSWEST COASTSELF STORAGESM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R E2022-10-10C-1.1CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER SECTION D-DCONSTRUCTION SYMBOL NOTES:Page 12 of 39 DICK KELLY DRIVESPYDER CIRCLEDINAH SHORE DRIVECLCLCL27.12.056 - Required on-site retention.Developments or redevelopments of one acre or more in size shall be designed to retain the stormwaterfrom a one hundred year, twenty-four hour, duration storm on site. (Ord. 1247 § 6, 2012)NOAA Precipitation Frequency DataLocation Name: Thousand Palms, California, USALatitude: 33.82°, Longitude: -116.3928°100-year storm24-hour 0.190in/hrPROPOSEDUNDERGROUNDRETENTION AREA 2BOTTOM = 193.50TOP = 198.00REQ'D BASIN VOL. = 4,955 CFWEST COASTSELF STORAGESM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R E2022-10-10LEGEND:DSSOIL TYPEGRAY, POORLY-GRADED FINE SAND-DRY(POSSIBLE FILL)GRAY, POORLY-GRADED SAND WITH SILT, FINETO MEDIUM, GRAINED- DRY TO MOIST (NATIVE)CONCEPTUAL WATERQUALITY MANAGEMENTPLAN0TRUE NORTH020 3010240SCALE: 1"=20'-0"C-2DMA 1 TABLEDMA 2 TABLESTORM EVENT SUMMARYUNDERGROUND STORAGE SUMMARYPROPOSEDUNDERGROUNDRETENTION AREA 1BOTTOM = 193.00TOP = 198.50REQ'D BASIN VOL. = 10,269 CFPage 13 of 39 WEST COASTSELF STORAGESM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R E2022-10-10CONCEPTUAL WATERQUALITY MANAGEMENTDETAILS0TRUE NORTH020 3010240SCALE: 1"=20'-0"C-2.1Page 14 of 39 DICK KELLY DRIVESPYDER CIRCLEDINAH SHORE DRIVECLCLCLLEGEND :IWWATER MAIN NOTES:SANITARY SEWER NOTES:STORM DRAIN NOTES:0TRUE NORTH020 3010240SCALE: 1"=20'-0"FIRE SYSTEM NOTES:WEST COASTSELF STORAGESM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R E2022-10-10CONCEPTUAL UTILITYPLANC-3VICINITY MAPNSPage 15 of 39 CLCL CL 1 A-2 2 A-2 2 A-3 1 A-3 3 A-3 2 A-6 2 A-6 1 A-6 1 A-6 CLCL CL VICINITY MAP N S SITE PLAN WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-10 0TRUE NORTH 0 40 602010 80 SCALE: 1"=20'-0" 2 2 2 1 5 5 6 7 8 9 7 4 4 4 11 3 3 3 1210 14 14 VICINITY MAP N S 14 14 14 13 8 PROJECT INFORMATION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (APN) ZONING CLASSIFICATION JURISDICTION EXISTING ZONE REQUIRED ZONE OVERLAY SITE AREA SITE AREA: BUILDING INFORMATION PARKING SUMMARY USER WCSS STANDARD ACCESSIBLE TOTAL RATIO REQUIRED * 694-240-021, 009, 010 CITY OF PALM DESERT (SI) SERVICE INDUSTRY NA ±1.87 AC (±81,240 SF) SPACES REQUIRED 6 SETBACK SPACES PROVIDED 66 6 FRONT: 20' STREET SIDE: 10' SIDE YARD : 0' 5 1 (SI) SERVICE INDUSTRY 5 1 REAR YARD : 0' KEY LEGEND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 LOADING STALLS 2 * STORAGE, PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITY - 6 + 2 PER CARETAKER UNIT NOTE: this site does not have a caretaker unit 11 12 SHORT TERM BICYCLE 2 2 LONG TERM BICYCLE 1 2 TOTAL 43 CLEAN AIR VEHICLE 00 WCSS LOT COVERAGE RATIO PROVIDED 66.1% LANDSCAPE ADJACENT TO OUTSIDE GATE PARKING AREA 30.0% 13 WCSS FLOOR AREA WCSS FLOOR-AREA RATIO PROVIDED 65.7% WCSS FLOOR-AREA RATIO (MAX ALLOWABLE)75.0% LEASING OFFICE AREA SELF-STORAGE AREA 644 SF 14 ±53,604 SF 52,960 SF 14 15 8 8 5 151515 15 15 8 8 Page 16 of 39 DICK KELLY DRIVE SPYDER CIRCLE DINAH SHORE DR IVE 1 A-2 2 A-2 2 A-3 1 A-3 3 A-3 2 A-6 2 A-6 1 A-6 1 A-6 CLCLCL CL CL C L8 A-1 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE N S PROJECT INFORMATION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (APN) ZONING CLASSIFICATION JURISDICTION EXISTING ZONE REQUIRED ZONE OVERLAY SITE AREA SITE AREA: BUILDING INFORMATION PARKING SUMMARY 694-240-021, 009, 010 CITY OF PALM DESERT (SI) SERVICE INDUSTRY NA ±1.87 AC (±81,240 SF) SETBACK FRONT: 20' STREET SIDE: 10' SIDE YARD : 0' DRAWING ISSUE/REVISION RECORD DATE NARRATIVE INITIALS (SI) SERVICE INDUSTRY REAR YARD : 0' SITE PLAN 12/10/2021 SP-4 LR WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 0TRUE NORTH 0 40 602010 80 SCALE: 1"=20'-0" KEY LEGEND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 2 2 2 1 5 5 6 7 9 8 7 4 4 4 11 3 3 10 11 12 3 12 WCSS LOT COVERAGE RATIO PROVIDED 66.0% 10 6/30/2022 SP-4.3 MA LANDSCAPE ADJACENT TO OUTSIDE GATE PARKING AREA 30.0% 13 5 8/08/2022 SP-4.4 MA 14 1414 14 15 15 8 USER WCSS STANDARD ACCESSIBLE TOTAL REQUIRED * REQUIRED 6 PROVIDED 66 6 5 1 5 1 LOADING STALLS 2 * STORAGE, PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITY - 6 + 2 PER CARETAKER UNIT NOTE: this site does not have a caretaker unit SHORT TERM BICYCLE 2 2 LONG TERM BICYCLE 1 2 TOTAL 43 CLEAN AIR VEHICLE 00 WCSS FLOOR AREA WCSS FLOOR-AREA RATIO PROVIDED 66.0% WCSS FLOOR-AREA RATIO (MAX ALLOWABLE)75.0% LEASING OFFICE AREA SELF-STORAGE AREA 685 SF ±53,590 SF 52,905 SF 10/13/2022 SP-4.5 MA 11 4 14 Page 17 of 39 98'106' 176' 116' 150'75' A-1.1 EGRESS PLAN WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 0TRUE NORTH 0 40 602010 80 SCALE: 1"=20'-0" PROJECT INFORMATION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (APN) BUILDING CODE SUMMARY OCCUPANCY TYPES SPRINKLERED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 694-240-021, 009, 010 S-1 (STORAGE); B (ACCESSORY OFFICE) OCCUPANCY DATA: TRAVEL DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS: EGRESS TRAVEL DISTANCE = < 250' PER CBC TABLE 1017.2 COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL = < 100' PER CBC 1006.2.1 MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN EXITS SHALL BE GREATER THAN 1/3 DIAGONAL DISTANCE OF AREA SERVED - REFER TO EGRESS PLANS OCCUPANT LOAD SUMMARY (PER CBC TABLE 1004.1.2): 1ST FLOOR (S-1) OCC. 52,905 S.F./500 = 106 OCC. 1ST FLOOR (B) OCC. 685 S.F./150 =5 OCC. TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD:111 OCC. YES, DEFFERED SUBMITTAL II-BBUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE YES, DEFFERED SUBMITTAL ALLOWABLE AREA PER FLOOR (BASED ON CBC SEC. 506): Aa = [At + (Ns x If)] x Sa At = 70,000 sf Ns= 17,500 sf If = 0 (NOT USED) Sa = 1.0 Aa = [70,000 + (17,500 x 0)] x (1.0) Aa = 70,000 x 1.0 Aa = 70,000 S.F. PER FLOOR ALLOWABLE AT TYPE II-B (FLOORS 1-3) PROPOSED MAX AREA: LEVEL 1: 53,590 sf 70,000 sf (THEREFORE, OK) Aa = [69,000 + (23,000 X 0) X (1.0) Aa = 69,000 X 1.0 Aa = 69,000 S.F. PER FLOOR ALLOWABLE AT TYPE II-B (FLOORS 1-3) PROPOSED MAX AREA: LEVEL 1: 685 sf 69,000 sf (THEREFORE, OK) PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT: 1 STORIES ±19'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE ALLOWABLE HEIGHT (TABLE 504.3 & 504.4): OCCUPANCY B , SPRINKLERED, TYPE II-B= 75' MAX (OKAY) OCCUPANCY S-1, SPRINKLERED, TYPE II-B= 75' MAX (OKAY) LEASING OFFICE AREA SELF-STORAGE AREA 685 SF 52,905 SF EGRESS LEGEND/NOTES XX'EGRESS PATH & TRAVEL DISTANCE ALONG INDICATED PATH. (COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL, PER TABLE 1017.2 FOR S-1 WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM 250 FEET IS ALLOWED) EXIT SIGNAGE: ANY TIME A BUILDING OR A PORTION OF A BUILDING IS OCCUPIES, THE MEANS OF EGRESS SERVING THE OCCUPIED PORTION SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT AN INTENSITY OF NOT LESS THAN 1-FOOT-CANDLE (11 LUX) AT THE WALKING SURFACE LEVEL. THE PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL TO EXITS AND WITHIN EXITS IN THE BUILDING SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY EXIT SIGNS CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1013 AND AS NOTED BELOW: A. EXIT SIGNS SHALL BE READILY VISIBLE FROM ANY DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL B. EXIT SIGNS SHALL BE LOCATED AS NECESSARY TO CLEARLY INDICATE THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL. C. NO POINT IN A CORRIDOR SHALL BE MORE THAN 100-FT OR THE LISTED VIEWING DISTANCE FOR THE SIGN, WHICHEVER IS LESS, FROM THE NEAREST VISIBLE EXIT SIGN. EXIT SIGNS SHALL BE INTERNALLY OR EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS SHALL BE LISTED AND LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UL 924 AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND SECTION 27. EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE GRAPHICS AND POWER SOURCE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTIONS 1013.6.1 AND 1013.6.3, RESPECTIVELY. WHEN THE FACE OF AN EXIT SIGN IS ILLUMINATED FROM AN EXTERNAL SOURCE, IT SHALL HAVE AN INTENSITY OF NOT LESS THAN 5-FOOR-CANDLES (54 LUX). (1013.6.2) EXIT SIGNS SHALL BE ILUMINATED AT ALL TIMES AND SHALL BE CONNECTED TO AN EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM THAT WILL PROVIDE AN ILLUMINATION OF NOT LESS THAN 90 MIN. IN CASE OF PRIMARY POWER LOSS. Page 18 of 39 A-2 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE N S EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS KEY LEGEND 1 2 3 4 EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 SOUTH ELEVATION ONTO DICK KELLY DRIVE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PL-3 +22'-0" A.F.F. T.O. HIGH PARAPET +2'-0" A.F.F. GRADE +23'- 4" A.F.F. T.O. HIGH PARAPET +0'-0" A.F.F. GRADE +0'-0" A.F.F. GRADE EAST ELEVATION ONTO DINAH SHORE DRIVE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. HIGH PARAPET +9'-6" A.F.F. B.O. CANOPY MTL-1 SF-2 CM-1 PL-2MTL-1 PL-1 SF-1SF-1 PL-3MTL-3 +8'-0" A.F.F. B.O. CANOPY PL-2 PL-1SF-2 PL-1 CM-1SF-2 +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. MID PARAPET PL-1 SF-1 CM-1 PL-1 PL-3 MTL-1 PL-2 PL-1 PL-3 MTL-3 PL-1 6 3 3 5 5 5 MTL-3 MTL-3 MTL-1 5 7 7 MTL-3PL-2 PL-4 PL-1 CM-1 SF-2 PL-3MTL-3 7 7 SF-2 8 8 8 8 CM-1SF-2 9 9 9 Page 19 of 39 A-3 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE N S EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 INTERIOR WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +0'-0" A.F.F. GRADE +20'-6" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +2'-0" A.F.F. GRADE +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +0'-0" A.F.F. GRADE 1 PL-1CM-1 SF-1 PL-2 PL-1PL-3 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 KEY LEGEND PL-1 PL-3 1 +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +0'-0" A.F.F. GRADE NORTH ELEVATION ONTO SPYDER CIRCLE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. LOW PARAPET +0'-0" A.F.F. GRADE +21'-0" A.F.F. T.O. HIGH PARAPET +9'-6" A.F.F. B.O. CANOPY MTL-1MTL-1 SF-2PL-2CM-1 SF-1 PL-3 PL-1 SF-1PL-3 PL-2 PL-3 +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. MID PARAPET PL-1CM-1 CM-1 CM-1 SF-2 CM-1 PL-3 SF-2PL-3 +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +21'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +24'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +10'-6" A.F.F. B.O. PARAPET PL-3 MTL-1 2 4 2 4 MTL-1 MTL-2 3 3 MTL-3 MTL-3 MTL-3 MTL-3 PL-1 PL-3 PL-1 MTL-3 3 MTL-3 MTL-3 PL-3 SF-2 SF-2 7 8 8 9 9 CM-1 1 2 3 4 6 5 7 8 9 Page 20 of 39 A-3.5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 NORTH ELEVATION ONTO SPYDER CIRCLE (REVISED) SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH ELEVATION ONTO DICK KELLY (REVISED) SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1 +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +0'-0" A.F.F. GRADE +23'-4" A.F.F. T.O. FEATURE +0'-0" A.F.F. GRADE +23'-4" A.F.F. T.O. FEATURE +0'-0" A.F.F. GRADE SOUTH ELEVATION ONTO DICK KELLY (PREVIOUS DESIGN) SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"2 +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +0'-0" A.F.F. GRADE NORTH ELEVATION ONTO SPYDER CIRCLE (PREVIOUS DESIGN) SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"4 Page 21 of 39 1 A-2 2 A-2 2 A-3 1 A-3 3 A-3 2 A-6 2 A-6 1 A-6 1 A-6 A-4 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE N S 1ST FLOOR KEY LEGEND 1 2 3 4 1 5 2 6 2 2 3 3 4 6 4 6 7 7 3 PROJECT INFORMATION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (APN) ZONING CLASSIFICATION JURISDICTION EXISTING ZONE REQUIRED ZONE OVERLAY SITE AREA SITE AREA: 694-240-021, 009, 010 CITY OF PALM DESERT (SI) SERVICE INDUSTRY NA ±1.87 AC (±81,240 SF) SETBACK FRONT: 20' STREET SIDE: 10' SIDE YARD : 0' DRAWING ISSUE/REVISION RECORD DATE NARRATIVE INITIALS (SI) SERVICE INDUSTRY REAR YARD : 0' 12/10/2021 SP-4 LR 2/11/2022 SP-4.2 MA 3 4 6 8 WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 6 7 8 0TRUE NORTH 0 40 602010 80 SCALE: 1"=20'-0" 4 3 BUILDING INFORMATION PARKING SUMMARY USER WCSS STANDARD ACCESSIBLE TOTAL RATIO REQUIRED * SPACES REQUIRED 6 SPACES PROVIDED 66 6 5 1 5 1 LOADING STALLS 2 * STORAGE, PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITY - 6 + 2 PER CARETAKER UNIT NOTE: this site does not have a caretaker unit SHORT TERM BICYCLE 2 2 LONG TERM BICYCLE 1 2 TOTAL 43 CLEAN AIR VEHICLE 00 9 9 10 10 LEASING OFFICE 101 BACK ROOM 102 JANITOR ROOM 104 RESTROOM 103 STORAGE AREA 100 STORAGE AREA 105 FIRE RISER ROOM 106 ELEC. ROOM 107 7 7 7 7 7 6/30/2022 SP-4.3 MA 53 3 8/08/2022 SP-4.4 MA WCSS FLOOR AREA WCSS FLOOR-AREA RATIO PROVIDED 66.0% WCSS FLOOR-AREA RATIO (MAX ALLOWABLE)75.0% LEASING OFFICE AREA SELF-STORAGE AREA 685 SF ±53,590 SF 52,905 SF 10/13/2022 SP-4.5 MA Page 22 of 39 2 A-6 2 A-6 1 A-6 1 A-6 2 A-3 1 A-3 1 A-2 2 A-2 A-5 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE N S ROOF PLAN KEY LEGEND 1 2 3 1 1 PROJECT INFORMATION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (APN) ZONING CLASSIFICATION JURISDICTION EXISTING ZONE REQUIRED ZONE OVERLAY SITE AREA SITE AREA: 694-240-021, 009, 010 CITY OF PALM DESERT (SI) SERVICE INDUSTRY NA ±1.87 AC (±81,240 SF) (SI) SERVICE INDUSTRY 1 WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 0TRUE NORTH 0 40 602010 80 SCALE: 1"=20'-0"1/4:121/4:121/4:121/4:123 4 4 4 5 5 9 BUILDING INFORMATION +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +20'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +21'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +20'-6" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +24'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +12'-6" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +20'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +20'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +21'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +20'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +19'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +15'-2" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +22'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +19'-2" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +24'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET 3 3 1 6 7 7 6 +22'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET 7 7 1 1 +17'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +7'-0" A.F.F. T.O. FEATURE +7'-0" A.F.F. T.O. FEATURE +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +12'-6" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +16'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +18'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +21'-0" A.F.F. T.O. PARAPET +13'-6" A.F.F. T.O. ROOF 8 8 8 8 9 WCSS FLOOR AREA WCSS FLOOR-AREA RATIO PROVIDED 66.0% WCSS FLOOR-AREA RATIO (MAX ALLOWABLE)75.0% LEASING OFFICE AREA SELF-STORAGE AREA 685 SF ±53,590 SF 52,905 SF +11'-0" A.F.F. T.O. ROOF Page 23 of 39 A-6 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE N S SECTIONS PROJECT INFORMATION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (APN) ZONING CLASSIFICATION JURISDICTION EXISTING ZONE REQUIRED ZONE OVERLAY SITE AREA SITE AREA: 694-240-021, 009, 010 CITY OF PALM DESERT (SI) SERVICE INDUSTRY NA ±1.87 AC (±81,240 SF) SETBACK FRONT: 20' STREET SIDE: 10' SIDE YARD : 0' DRAWING ISSUE/REVISION RECORD DATE NARRATIVE INITIALS (SI) SERVICE INDUSTRY REAR YARD : 0' 12/10/2021 SP-4 LR 1/12/2022 SP-4.1 LR 2/11/2022 SP-4.2 MA WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 -0'-0" GRADE LEVEL +16'-0" T.O. PARAPET +12'-5" B.O. ROOF DECK -0'-0" GRADE LEVEL +16'-0" T.O. PARAPET +12'-5" B.O. ROOF DECK +12'-0" B.O. ROOF DECK -0'-0" GRADE LEVEL +18'-0" T.O. PARAPET +24'-0" T.O. PARAPET BUILDING INFORMATION PARKING SUMMARY USER WCSS STANDARD ACCESSIBLE TOTAL RATIO REQUIRED * SPACES REQUIRED 6 SPACES PROVIDED 66 6 5 1 5 1 LOADING STALLS 2 * STORAGE, PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITY - 6 + 2 PER CARETAKER UNIT NOTE: this site does not have a caretaker unit 6/30/2022 SP-4.3 MA 8/08/2022 SP-4.4 MA WCSS FLOOR AREA WCSS FLOOR-AREA RATIO PROVIDED 66.0% WCSS FLOOR-AREA RATIO (MAX ALLOWABLE)75.0% LEASING OFFICE AREA SELF-STORAGE AREA 685 SF ±53,590 SF 52,905 SF 10/13/2022 SP-4.5 MA Page 24 of 39 A-7 MATERIAL BOARD WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 8 7 8 4 8 5 116 1 8" Angelus Slumpstone CMU Color: Mission 2 83 Cement Plaster System Color: Grounded SW6089 Finish: 20/30 Sand Cement Plaster System Color: Stonebriar SW7693 Finish: 20/30 Sand 4 Cement Plaster System Color: Softer Tan SW6141 Finish: 30/30 Sand Prefabricated Mapes Metal Canopy Color: Forged Steel SW9565 Sherwin Williams Aluminum Storefront Frames Color: Continental Brown, Janus 6 Aluminum Spandrel Window Color: Continental Brown, Janus 7 6233 5 Insulated Metal Panel Color: Copper Penny Finish: Smooth Embossing 5 7 9 Cement Plaster System (not shown) Color: Softer Tan SW6141 Finish: Vertical Rough Cast Page 25 of 39 STANDARD PARKING STALL SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1TRASH ENLOSURE ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4 C D A B ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"3 LADDER TO ROOF HATCH (INTERIOR) SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"2 OUTSIDE CORNER (KINGSPAN MTL.) SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"6 PARAPET CAP (KINGSPAN MTL.) SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"5CEMENT STUCCO PARAPET CAP SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"7 “ ” A-8 DETAILS WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 Page 26 of 39 A-9 RENDERS WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 Page 27 of 39 A-10 RENDERS WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 Page 28 of 39 A-11 RENDERS WEST COAST SELF STORAGE SM330.21 DICK KELLY DRIVE & NWC DINAH SHORE DR 10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175 Tel (949) 515-9600 www.magellanarchitects.com ageM anll A R C H I T E C T U R E 2022-10-13 Page 29 of 39 D I C K K E L L Y D R I V ES P Y D E R C I R C L EDINAH SHORE DRIVELEFT IN ACCESSLEFT IN ACCESSPROPOSEDSELF-STORAGEBUILDINGPROPOSEDSELF-STORAGEBUILDINGCLCLCLCLEXISTING LANDSCAPE &PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTCLCLTREE UPLIGHTS PER ELECTRICAL PLANS, TYPLANDSCAPE BOULDERS, TYPLINE OF SIGHTLINE OF SIGHTPROPOSED SHRUBS1 GAL /30" O.C.AGAVE PARRYI /PARRY'S AGAVECAESALPINEA MEXICANA /MEXICAN BIRD OF PARADISECONVOLVULUS CNEORUM /SILVER BUSH MORNING GLORYDALEA GREGGII /TRAILING INDIGO BUSHLEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS /TEXAS RANGERHESPERALOE PARVIFLORA /RED YUCCASALVIA LEUCANTHA /MEXICAN BUSH SAGEAGAVE VILMORINIANA /OCTOPUS AGAVESALVIA GREGII 'FURHMAN'S RED' /FURHMANS RED SAGEBOUGAINVILLEA 'MONKA' /OO-LA-LA BOUGAINVILLEACALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' /DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH5 GAL /36" O.C.5 GAL /42" O.C.1 GAL /24" O.C.5 GAL /36" O.C.5 GAL /48" O.C.1 GAL /30" O.C.1 GAL /36" O.C.5 GAL /36" O.C.1 GAL /30" O.C.5 GAL /36" O.C.AGAVE AMERICANA /CENTURY PLANT5 GAL /36" O.C.PLANT MATERIAL MAY BE ADDED TO OR SUBTRACTEDFROM THE ABOVE LIST DURING THE CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENT PHASE DUE TO MINOR SITE PLANMODIFICATIONS AS WELL AS AVAILABILITY OF PLANTMATERIAL.PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE DECOMPOSEDGRANITE MULCH IN LIEU OF BARK MULCH.SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS QUANTITYPROPOSED GROUNDCOVERBACCHARIS 'CENTENNIAL' /CENTENNIAL BACCHARIS5 GAL /42" O.C.LANDSCAPE BOULDERSLOWMODMODLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWMODMODLOWLOWREGION 6LOW DESERTDRIP IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALLPROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL.CALLIANDRA HAENAOCEPHALA/RED POWDER PUFF5 GAL /PER PLANMODROCK COBBLE6031416554283017112840191414SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS QUANTITY PROPOSED TREESPRELIMINARY PLANTING LEGENDACACIA SMALLII /SWEET ACACIA24" BOXSTANDARDWASHINGTONIA FILIFERA /CALIFORNIA FAN PALM16' BTHSTRAIGHT TRUNKPROSOPIS CHILENSIS /MESQUITE24" BOXSTANDARDCERCIDIUM X. 'DESERT MUSEUM' /DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE24" BOXSTANDARDREGION 6LOW DESERTLOWMODLOWLOW(THORNLESS, DECIDUOUS)(SEMI-DECIDUOUS)(EVERGREEN)(SEMI-DECIDUOUS)BRAHEA ARMATA /MEXICAN BLUE PALM24" BOXSTRAIGHT TRUNKLOW(EVERGREEN)719797(Date)(Signature)Lic. #5439Colleen M. Nolan10.13.2022Colleen M. NolanLandscape Architect, #543913355 Silverado CourtCorona, CA 92883714.743.7915 cellcnolan@cox.netWEST COASTSELF STORAGE0TRUE NORTH020 3010240SCALE: 1"=20'-0"2022-10-13SM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R EL-1PRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLANPage 30 of 39 PROPOSED SHRUBS1 GAL /30" O.C.AGAVE PARRYI /PARRY'S AGAVECAESALPINEA MEXICANA /MEXICAN BIRD OF PARADISECONVOLVULUS CNEORUM /SILVER BUSH MORNING GLORYDALEA GREGGII /TRAILING INDIGO BUSHLEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS /TEXAS RANGERHESPERALOE PARVIFLORA /RED YUCCASALVIA LEUCANTHA /MEXICAN BUSH SAGEAGAVE VILMORINIANA /OCTOPUS AGAVESALVIA GREGII 'FURHMAN'S RED' /FURHMANS RED SAGEBOUGAINVILLEA 'MONKA' /OO-LA-LA BOUGAINVILLEACALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' /DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH5 GAL /36" O.C.5 GAL /42" O.C.1 GAL /24" O.C.5 GAL /36" O.C.5 GAL /48" O.C.1 GAL /30" O.C.1 GAL /36" O.C.5 GAL /36" O.C.1 GAL /30" O.C.5 GAL /36" O.C.AGAVE AMERICANA /CENTURY PLANT5 GAL /36" O.C.PLANT MATERIAL MAY BE ADDED TO OR SUBTRACTEDFROM THE ABOVE LIST DURING THE CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENT PHASE DUE TO MINOR SITE PLANMODIFICATIONS AS WELL AS AVAILABILITY OF PLANTMATERIAL.PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE DECOMPOSEDGRANITE MULCH IN LIEU OF BARK MULCH.SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS PROPOSED GROUNDCOVERBACCHARIS 'CENTENNIAL' /CENTENNIAL BACCHARIS5 GAL /42" O.C.LANDSCAPE BOULDERSLOWMODMODLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWLOWMODMODLOWLOWREGION 6LOW DESERTDRIP IRRIGATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALLPROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL.CALLIANDRA HAENAOCEPHALA/RED POWDER PUFF5 GAL /PER PLANMODROCK COBBLESYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS PROPOSED TREESPRELIMINARY PLANTING LEGENDACACIA SMALLII /SWEET ACACIA24" BOXSTANDARDWASHINGTONIA FILIFERA /CALIFORNIA FAN PALM16' BTHSTRAIGHT TRUNKPROSOPIS CHILENSIS /MESQUITE24" BOXSTANDARDCERCIDIUM X. 'DESERT MUSEUM' /DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE24" BOXSTANDARDREGION 6LOW DESERTLOWMODLOWLOW(THORNLESS, DECIDUOUS)(SEMI-DECIDUOUS)(EVERGREEN)(SEMI-DECIDUOUS)BRAHEA ARMATA /MEXICAN BLUE PALM24" BOXSTRAIGHT TRUNKLOW(EVERGREEN)(Date)(Signature)Lic. #5439Colleen M. Nolan10.13.2022Colleen M. NolanLandscape Architect, #543913355 Silverado CourtCorona, CA 92883714.743.7915 cellcnolan@cox.netWEST COASTSELF STORAGE0TRUE NORTH020 3010240SCALE: 1"=20'-0"2022-10-13SM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R EACACIA SMALLII /SWEET ACACIAWASHINGTONIA FILIFERA /CALIFORNIA FAN PALMPROSOPIS CHILENSIS /MESQUITECERCIDIUM X. 'DESERT MUSEUM' /DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDEAGAVE PARRYI /PARRY'S AGAVEBACCHARIS 'CENTENNIAL' /CENTENNIAL BACCHARISCAESALPINEA MEXICANA /MEXICAN BIRD OF PARADISECONVOLVULUS CNEORUM /BUSH MORNING GLORYDALEA GREGGII /TRAILING INDIGO BUSHLEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS /TEXAS RANGERHESPERALOE PARVIFLORA /RED/YELLOW YUCCASALVIA LEUCANTHA /MEXICAN SAGEAGAVE VILMORINIANA /OCTOPUS AGAVESALVIA GREGII 'FURHMAN'S RED' /FURHMANS RED SAGEBOUGAINVILLEA 'MONKA' /OO-LA-LA BOUGAINVILLEACALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' /DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH(THORNLESS)AGAVE AMERICANA /CENTURY PLANTL-2PLANT PHOTOSLANDSCAPE BOULDERSTREESSHRUBSSHRUBSGROUNDCOVER MASCAGNIA MACROPTERA /YELLOW BUTTERFLY VINEVINES BRAHEA ARMATA /MEXICAN BLUE PALMDECOMPOSED GRANITE MULCHROCK COBBLEPage 31 of 39 0.20.20.20.10.71.30.40.10.10.30.30.10.00.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.9 0.90.80.60.20.20.20.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.10.20.10.00.20.60.60.60.50.40.50.40.20.30.30.40.70.60.20.30.30.30.30.30.40.40.40.30.30.30.40.50.70.50.30.40.50.40.20.20.20.11.41.40.2 2.1 0.1 1.1 2.5 2.1 2.4 1.4 1.2 2.4 3.4 2.6 2.3 0.8 1.5 2.6 3.5 3.9 2.3 1.61.10.41.50.21.61.11.42.0 1.97.91.9 0.62.30.11.90.52.12.12.42.1 2.60.73.0 2.52.12.2 2.80.62.8 2.210.22.55.61.22.32.00.81.51.40.20.10.61.73.44.41.90.30.41.91.84.41.70.30.30.80.00.72.20.90.26.42.81.60.30.912.114.910.02.82.81.10.20.41.30.40.10.70.80.61.21.61.02.22.01.11.82.11.41.82.31.61.82.62.22.73.22.82.74.23.62.22.03.34.74.26.11.93.04.84.92.13.43.51.32.33.01.62.52.42.22.51.92.32.41.61.82.31.51.72.21.42.22.11.21.71.91.21.11.51.41.62.12.21.71.72.12.92.41.32.02.21.91.92.22.12.32.32.22.52.11.21.92.21.91.61.91.41.92.32.22.11.81.11.11.51.41.51.92.21.62.12.62.71.81.21.13.32.49.29.5SA @ 12'SCE @ 10' 6"SA @ 12'SA @ 12'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SC @ 10' 6"SC @ 10' 6"SC @ 10' 6"SC @ 9' 6"SC @ 9' 6"SC @ 9' 6"SD @ 10'SC @ 9' 6"SC @ 9' 6"SCE @ 8'SC @ 9' 6"SC @ 9' 6"SA @ 12'SA @ 12'SA @ 12'SA @ 12'SF @ 10'SF @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SG @ 15'SCE @ 8'SCE @ 8'SCE @ 8'SCE @ 8'SB @ 12'SA @ 12'SA @ 12'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'SD @ 10'ScheduleSymbol Label Quantity ManufacturerCatalog NumberDescriptionLampFilenameLumens Per LampLight Loss FactorWattageSA9 Lithonia LightingWDGE2 LED P3 40K 80CRI TFTM MVOLT (FINISH)WDGE2 LED WITH P3 - PERFORMANCE PACKAGE, 4000K, 80CRI, TYPE FORWARD THROW MEDIUM OPTIC. B=1. U-0. G=1.LED - 4000KWDGE2_LED_P3_40K_80CRI_TFTM.ies31660.91 32.1375SB1 Lithonia LightingWDGE2 LED P3 40K 80CRI T3M MVOLT (FINISH)WDGE2 LED WITH P3 - PERFORMANCE PACKAGE, 4000K, 80CRI, TYPE 3 MEDIUM OPTICLED - 4000KWDGE2_LED_P3_40K_80CRI_T3M.ies32160.91 32.1375SC10 Lithonia LightingLDN6 40/10 LO6AR LSS MVOLT EZ10 6IN LDN, 4000K, 1000LM, 80CRI, CLEAR, SEMI-SPECULAR REFLECTOR. B=1. U-0. G=0.LED - 4000KLDN6_40_10_LO6AR_LSS.ies10540.9112.75SCE6 Lithonia LightingLDN6 40/10 LO6AR LSS MVOLT EZ10 EL 6IN LDN, 4000K, 1000LM, 80CRI, CLEAR, SEMI-SPECULAR REFLECTOR W/EM BATTERY PACK. B=1. U-0. G=0.LED - 4000KLDN6_40_10_LO6AR_LSS.ies10540.9112.75SD20 Lithonia LightingWDGE2 LED P1 40K 80CRI T1S MVOLT (FINISH)WDGE2 LED WITH P1 - PERFORMANCE PACKAGE, 4000K, 80CRI, TYPE 1 SHORT OPTIC. B=0. U=0. G=1.LED - 4000KWDGE2_LED_P1_40K_80CRI_T1S.ies12150.91 11.1658SF2 EvenliteWW AC (FINISH)WWAC/EM WEatherway in Normal AC Mode. B=1. U-0. G=1.LED - 4000KWWAC_EM-WeatherWay-In-Normal-AC-Mode.ies15290.9115.8SG1 Lithonia LightingDSX0 LED P3 40K T2M MVOLT SPA HS (FINISH) / SSS 12.5' W/2.5' BASEDSX0 LED P3 40K T2M MVOLT with houseside shield. B=1. U=0. G=2.LED - 4000KDSX0_LED_P3_40K_T2M_MVOLT_HS.ies69070.9171StatisticsDescriptionSymbol Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min AvgPROPERTY LINE - FC @ GRADE1.4 fc 0.0 fc N/AN/A 0.4 fcSITE - FC @ GRADE9.5 fc 0.6 fc 15.8:1 3.8:1 2.3 fcPERIMETER SITE - FC @ GRADE14.9 fc 0.0 fc N/AN/A 2.2 fcWEST COASTSELF STORAGESM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R E2022-10-03PH-1SITEPHOTOMETRICPage 32 of 39 WEST COASTSELF STORAGESM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R E2022-10-03PH-2LIGHTINGCUTSHEETSPage 33 of 39 WEST COASTSELF STORAGESM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R E2022-10-03PH-3LIGHTINGCUTSHEETSPage 34 of 39 WEST COASTSELF STORAGESM330.21DICK KELLY DRIVE &NWC DINAH SHORE DR10540 Talbert Ave. Suite 175Tel (949) 515-9600www.magellanarchitects.comageManllA R C H I T E C T U R E2022-10-03PH-4LIGHTINGCUTSHEETSPage 35 of 39 1 | P a g e Wednesday, October 12, 2022 Nick Melloni Associate Planner City of Palm Desert Ph: 760.346.0611 Direct: 760.776.6479 Email: nmelloni@cityofpalmdesert.org RE: West Coast Self Storage Facility – PP/EA 22-0005 / PMW22-0006 – 3rd Submittal On behalf of West Coast Self-Storage, please see below responses in red to the City’s 1st Submittal Comment Letter dated September 12, 2022: 1. Revisit design techniques used to break up overall mass of the building, design should be more cohesive; Noted 2). Remove all trellis elements; Noted. 3). Revisit central connecting element on south elevation, provide relief or other element to allow design to read as two buildings instead of continuous building; Noted. 4). Provide a suitable alternative for southern live oak; Switched Southern Live Oak back to Mesquite. 5). The applicant shall provide a meandering sidewalk and additional landscaping on the Dinah Shore Drive frontage, rather than curb adjacent landscaping, to maintain consistency with existing industrial development along the corridor, while considering vehicular line-of-sight for Dinah Shore Drive and Spyder Circle; Meandering sidewalk updated on Site Plan. Landscaped assed to parkway along Dinah Shore Drive. 6). The applicant shall provide landscape plantings for tress along Dinah Shore Drive and Dick Kelly Drive; Additional landscape provided along Dinah Shore and Dick Kelly Drive. 7). The applicant shall provide additional cobble as a part of the landscape plan to provide a variation in texture, soil stabilization, and for the resistance to high winds; Rock cobble added at the perimeter of the project. 8). The applicant shall verify that the roof-top units on the western portion of the building shall fully screened with consideration to the changes in parapet height to ensure there is no visibility from all vantage points; Noted. Page 36 of 39 9) The applicant shall identify the minimum number of landscape plantings for each respective live planting shown on the landscape plan; Plant quantities have been added to plan. 10) The proposed exterior wall signage construction, if proposed facing existing residential and/or residentially zoned properties, shall utilize haloillumination to reduce glare for adjacent residential areas; Noted. 11) Roof drainage systems shall be placed within interior walls Noted. 12) Applicant shall provide screening of parking areas from Spyder Circle by means of low block wall, landscape, or berm; and Plant material provided will screen parking based on depth of location of stalls. 13) The walls of the trash enclosure shall be finished to match the primary building. Noted. Individual Commissioner’s offered additional commentary as follows. The points below do not necessarily reflect consensus: • Consider use of landscaping, glazing, or other elements to break up building and to help with transition from residential to commercial. Double row of palms added to building cutout. • Variety in architecture is too diverse and does not tie together, use a continuous theme to provide a more cohesive design. Noted. END OF RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Page 37 of 39 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOTICE OF ACTION September 12, 2022 Scott A. Mommer Consulting 28827 N 91st Avenue Peoria AZ, 85383 Subject: PP22-0005 - Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of a Precise Plan for West Coast Storage Facility, a 53,378 square-foot personal storage facility located at the northwest corner of Dick Kelly Drive and Dinah Shore Drive. The Architectural Review Commission of the City of Palm Desert considered your request and took the following action at its special meeting of August 30, 2022: A motion for continuance was made by Commissioner McAuliffe, seconded by Vice Chair McIntosh, and carried by a 5-0 vote of the Commission. During deliberations, Commissioners’ offered commentary as follows: 1) Revisit design techniques used to break up overall mass of the building, design should be more cohesive; 2) Remove trellis elements; 3) Revisit central connecting element on south elevation, provide relief or other element to allow design to read as two buildings instead of a continuous building; 4) Provide a suitable alternative for southern live oak; 5) The applicant shall provide a meandering sidewalk and additional landscaping on the Dinah Shore Drive frontage, rather than curb adjacent landscaping, to maintain consistency with existing industrial development along the corridor, while considering vehicular line-of-sight for Dinah Shore Drive and Spyder Circle; 6) The applicant shall provide additional landscape plantings for trees along Dinah Shore Drive and Dick Kelly Drive; 7) The applicant shall provide additional cobble as a part of the landscape plan to provide a variation in texture, soil stabilization, and for resistance to high winds; 8) The applicant shall verify that the roof-top units on the western portion of the building shall fully screened with consideration to the changes in parapet height to ensure there is no visibility from all vantage points; 9) The applicant shall identify the minimum number of landscape plantings for each respective live planting shown on the landscape plan; 10) The proposed exterior wall signage construction, if proposed facing existing residential and/or residentially zoned properties, shall utilize halo- illumination to reduce glare for adjacent residential areas; 11) Roof drainage systems shall be placed within interior walls; 12) Applicant shall provide screening of parking Page 38 of 39 areas from Spyder Circle by means of low block wall, landscape, or berm; and 13) The walls of the trash enclosure shall be finished to match the primary building. (AYES: Colvard, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Vuksic; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: None). Individual Commissioner’s offered additional commentary as follows. The points below do not necessarily reflect consensus: • Consider use of landscaping, glazing, or other elements to break up building and to help with transition from residential to commercial. • Variety in architecture is too diverse and does not tie together, use a continuous theme to provide a more cohesive design. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within 15 days of the date of the decision. If you have any questions, please contact Senior Planner, Nick Melloni, at (760) 776-6479 or nmelloni@cityofpalmdesert.org. Sincerely, ROSIE LUA, SECRETARY ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION cc: File Page 39 of 39 CITY OF PALM DESERTATTENDANCE REPORTAdvisory Body: Prepared By:YearMonthDate 11‐Jan 25‐Jan 8‐Feb 22‐Feb 8‐Mar 22‐Mar 12‐Apr 26‐Apr 10‐May 24‐May 14‐Jun 28‐Jun 12‐Jul 26‐Jul 9‐Aug 23‐Aug 13‐Sep 27‐Sep 11‐Oct 25‐Oct 8‐Nov 22‐Nov 13‐Dec 27‐DecLambell, KarelP P P P‐APPPPPP21Latkovic, Nicholas P P P P‐PPPPPPP‐‐‐PPPP40McAuliffe, Michael P P P P‐PPPAPPP‐‐‐PAPP62McIntosh, James P P P P‐PPAPPPA‐‐‐PPAP73Van Vliet, ChrisP P P P‐PAPP PPP21Vuksic, JohnP P P P‐PPPPPPP‐‐‐PPPP40Colvard, Dean WallacePPPP00Sanchez, FranciscoPPP00Palm Desert Municipal Code 2.34.010:PPresentAAbsentEExcused‐No meeting2022 2022 2022 2022 2022Total AbsencesOctNovDecArchitectural Review CommissionM. Gonzalez2022 2022Twice Monthly: Six unexcused absences from regular meetings in any twelve‐month period shall constitute an automatic resignation of members holding office on boards that meet twice monthly.Total Unexcused AbsencesJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep2022 20222022 2022 2022