HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-01-24 ARC Regular Meeting Agenda PacketCity of Palm Desert Page 1
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
AGENDA
(HYBRID MEETING)
City Hall, Development Services Conference Room
73-510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. There
will be in-person public access to the meeting location.
OPTIONS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THIS MEETING:
•Attend the meeting in the Development Services Conference Room at Palm Desert City Hall,
73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
•To participate via Zoom, use the following link: https://palmdesert.zoom.us/j/83648797515,
Zoom Webinar ID: 836 4879 7515.
•To participate by telephone call (213) 338-8477 or (669) 219-2599, Zoom Webinar ID: 836
4879 7515. To provide a public comment please press *9 to raise your hand.
•Written public comment may also be submitted to planning@cityofpalmdesert.org. Emails
received by 9:30 a.m. prior to the meeting will be distributed to the Commission. Any
correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Commission as
soon as practicable and retained for the official record. Emails will not be read aloud except
as an ADA accommodation.
1.CALL TO ORDER
2.ROLL CALL
3.NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT: This time has been set aside for the public to address
the Architectural Review Commission on issues that are not on the agenda for up to three
minutes. Because the Brown Act does not allow the Commission to act on items not listed on
the agenda, members may briefly respond or refer the matter to staff for a report and
recommendation at a future meeting.
4.CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine
and may be approved by one motion. The public may comment on any items on the Consent
Agenda within the three-minute time limit. Individual items may be removed by Commissioners
for a separate discussion.
Tuesday
January 24, 2023 12:30 p.m.
Regular Meeting
Page 1 of 115
Architectural Review Commission Agenda January 24, 2023
City of Palm Desert Page 2
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Architectural Review Commission Special Meeting
Study Session minutes of December 6, 2022.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Architectural Review Commission Regular Meeting
minutes of January 10, 2023.
CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER: Items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
discussion will be considered at this time.
5. ACTION CALENDAR
A. FINAL DRAWINGS
1. CASE NO: MISC22-0043 (Continued from January 10, 2023)
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a
materials exception for an existing fence in the front yard setback of a single-family
residence located at 77100 Indiana Avenue.
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Theresa Illare, Palm Desert, CA 92211
LOCATION: 77100 Indiana Avenue
ZONE: Single-Family Residential (R-1)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve Case No. MISC22-0043 for a height and setback exception for a 5-foot,
2-inch wall or fence with the following condition of approval:
a) The Applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to City staff incorporating
additional planting materials at the front yard with varying heights to screen the
wall.
2. Any modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of
approval.
2. CASE NO: PP22-0004 Amendment No.1
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration of an amendment to
Precise Plan (PP) 22-0004, revising the exterior architecture for a 150-unit multi-family
residential community on a 6.8-acre parcel located at 77800 Gerald Ford Drive (APN
694-520-019, and -020).
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Western National Group, Irvine, CA 92614
LOCATION: 77800 Gerald Ford Drive
ZONE: Planned Residential (PR-19)
Page 2 of 115
Architectural Review Commission Agenda January 24, 2023
City of Palm Desert Page 3
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve Case No. PP22-0004 Amendment No. 1 with the following conditions of
approval:
a) The applicant shall provide a minimum 42-inch wall to enclose the patios of all
ground floor apartment units of Building Type A, which are adjacent to Gerald
Ford Drive, and visible from internal drive aisles. Other private patios shall be
enclosed by use of a 42-inch block wall, 42-inch railing, or permanently
maintained 42-inch hedge, which shall be reviewed by the ARC at final
construction drawings.
b) Where the metal mesh is removed from external stairwells, the applicant shall
provide a minimum thickness of 18 inches around the border of the area where
the mesh was removed. The applicant shall provide appropriate details
illustrating the modification, including cross sections, on the final construction
drawings.
c) All balconies shall include material elements to screen storage of personal
items by residents.
d) The final construction drawings shall return to an ARC subcommittee for final
acceptance and substantial conformance review.
2. Any modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of
approval.
3. CASE NO: SARC22-0004
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration for approval of a
comprehensive sign program for exterior signage for Palms to Pines West commercial
center.
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: The Signs and Services Company, Stanton, CA 90680
LOCATION: 72740 El Paseo
ZONE: Office Professional (OP)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve the sign program Case No. SARC22-0004 with the following condition of
approval:
a) Prior to the issuance of any sign permit the applicant shall resubmit a revised
sign program to planning staff which omits the maximum 111 square foot sign
area and revise to state the maximum sign area for M1 is 149.38 square feet
and 121.01 square feet of sign area for M2.
2. Any modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of
approval.
4. CASE NO: SARC22-0005
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration for Architectural
Review Commission approval of a comprehensive sign program for exterior signage for
the Oracle Plaza.
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Signarama, Palm Desert, CA 92211
LOCATION: 73585 Fred Waring Drive
Page 3 of 115
Architectural Review Commission Agenda January 24, 2023
City of Palm Desert Page 4
ZONE: Office Professional (OP)
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve sign program Case No. SARC22-0005 with the following conditions of
approval:
a) Prior to the issuance of any sign permit, the applicant shall submit a revised
Sign Program to Planning Staff which includes a restriction that all exterior
signs including, window signs shall be non-illuminated on all elevations
facing existing residential uses.
b) Prior to the issuance of any sign permit, the applicant shall submit a revised
Sign Program to Planning Staff that includes a revised floor plan in the
document which clearly associates each suite number with a specific
exterior sign location,
c) The sign program shall be revised to identify all prohibited signs and comply
with Palm Desert Municipal Code Chapter 25.56.050.
d) Window signs shall be prohibited on all second story windows.
2. Any exceptions or modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as
conditions of approval.
B. MISCELLANEOUS
None
6. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS
A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONERS
B. CITY STAFF
C. ATTENDANCE REPORT
7. ADJOURNMENT: The next Regular Meeting will be held on February 14, 2023, at 12:30 p.m.
Page 4 of 115
Architectural Review Commission Agenda January 24, 2023
City of Palm Desert Page 5
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing agenda for the Architectural Review Commission was posted on the City Hall bulletin
board and City website not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting.
Melinda Gonzalez
Recording Secretary
PUBLIC NOTICES
Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated
office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Development Services
Department, City Hall, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda
items and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public
inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.cityofpalmdesert.org.
Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at
this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what
is normally provided, the city will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner.
Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the
meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible.
Page 5 of 115
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
SPECIAL MEETING
STUDY SESSION MINUTES
December 6, 2022, 2:00 p.m.
(HYBRID MEETING)
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. There
will be in-person public access to the meeting location.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A Special Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) was called to order by Chair
Vuksic on Tuesday, December 6, 2022, at 2:02 p.m. in the Development Services Conference
Room, City Hall, located at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Dean Wallace Colvard, Nicholas Latkovic, Michael McAuliffe, Vice
Chair McIntosh, Francisco Sanchez, and Chair John Vuksic.
Absent: None
City Staff
Present: Richard Cannone, Director of Development Services; Rosie Lua, Deputy Director
of Development Services; Nick Melloni, Senior Planner, and Melinda Gonzalez,
Recording Secretary, were present at Roll Call.
III. STUDY SESSION ITEMS
Associated memos, attachments, handouts, and discussion on the following items can be
viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website:
https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission-
information.
The following are handouts which were provided to Commissioners during the meeting and
posted on the City of Palm Desert website for public review.
1. Ordinance 1386 – ARC Bylaws
2. Chapter 25.60.070 Approving Authority
3. Chap. 25.60 PROCEDURES
4. Chap.25.70 Approving Authority
5. Chapter 25.68 DECISIONS BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
6. List of ARC Responsibilities in PDMC
7. Sample Wall Application (MISC22-0014 Harding Residence)
Page 6 of 115
Architectural Review Commission Special Meeting Study Session Minutes December 6, 2022
2
8. Sample Design Review Application (MISC22-0019 Travis Mathew)
9. Sample Precise Plan Application (PP21-0008 Santa Barbara Condos)
10. Architectural Review Commission Agenda 10.25.22
11. Architectural Review Commission Minutes 10.25.22
12. Notice of Action PP22-0005 West Coast Storage
13. Other Jurisdictions (Sample Findings/Standards of other Jurisdictions with an ARC)
14. Sample Motion (Forming a Motion)
15. Framework Worksheet (Reviewing Design Review Applications)
16. Design Review Criteria Worksheet
The following items were discussed at the Palm Desert Architectural Review Commission
(ARC) Study Session. No action was taken at the Study Session as this meeting was held for
educational and informational purposes solely. Deputy Director of Development Services,
Rosie Lua, narrated a PowerPoint presentation (Presentation) for the duration of the meeting’s
discussion.
A. Public Comment
No members of the public were in attendance.
B. Overview and Discussion
1. Recently adopted ARC Bylaws
Deputy Director Lua provided an overview of the history of ARC Bylaws and currently
adopted ARC Bylaws. Discussion ensued on the subject matter.
2. Approval Authority and Decisions by the ARC
Deputy Director Lua provided information and explanation regarding the approval
authority and decision making of the ARC and development standards and findings
which relate to the different review applications brought before the ARC. Discussion
ensued on the subject matter.
3. Agendas and Minutes
Deputy Director Lua provided an overview of ARC Agendas, Motions, and Notices of
Action. ARC Agendas, Minutes, and Notices of Action were reviewed in detail.
Discussion ensued on the subject matter.
4. Application Review
a. Sample Memos / Staff Reports
Deputy Director Lua provided sample planning applications and their associated ARC
staff reports which were reviewed. Deputy Director Lua provided explanation on the
sample applications and the required findings needed for approval of each application
which are analyzed by staff in the ARC staff reports prepared for each project. Deputy
Director Lua discussed the potential for a “project review guide” to help commissioners
review larger projects systematically and uniformly. Discussion ensued on the subject
matter.
Page 7 of 115
Architectural Review Commission Special Meeting Study Session Minutes December 6, 2022
3
C. Discussion on Design Criteria
Deputy Director Lua informed staff is currently reviewing the design review application to
identify opportunities for revisions to ensure all necessary documents and items are noted as
a requirement for a complete application. Additionally, staff is working toward the development
of objective design standards and requested input from commissioners to help identify a
comprehensive list of potential items which should be considered. The anticipated goal is to
provide this list to a consultant to compile and create core design standards which would
ultimately be codified. Discussion ensued on the subject matter.
D. Discussion of Next Steps
Deputy Director Lua opened the discussion for commissioner’s comments. Commissioner’s
expressed a desire to review the list of potential items for design standards when it has been
completed. Commissioners agreed they would provide their input to staff in a timely manner.
E. Adjournment
The Architectural Review Commission adjourned at 4:17 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
_
Melinda Gonzalez, Senior Administrative Assistant
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
_
Rosie Lua, Deputy Director of Development Services
Secretary
APPROVED BY ARC: / /2023
Page 8 of 115
City of Palm Desert Page 1
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES
(HYBRID MEETING)
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. There
will be in-person public access to the meeting location.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) was called to order by
Chair Vuksic on Tuesday, January 10, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. in the Development Services
Conference Room, City Hall, located at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Dean Wallace Colvard, Nicholas Latkovic, Michael McAuliffe, Vice
Chair Jim McIntosh, Francisco Sanchez, and Chair John Vuksic.
Absent:
City Staff
Present: Rosie Lua, Deputy Director of Development Services; Nick Melloni, Senior
Planner; Anna Dan, Assistant Planner; Nikki Gomez, Assistant Planner; and
Melinda Gonzalez, Recording Secretary, were present at Roll Call.
3. NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT
Chair Vuksic opened and closed the non-agenda public comment period. No public
comments were provided.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be
viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at,
https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission-
information.
Chair Vuksic opened and closed the public comment period for the Consent Calendar. No
public comments were provided.
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER COLVARD,
CARRIED 6-0; to approve the consent calendar.
Tuesday
January 10, 2023
12:30 p.m.
Regular Meeting
Page 9 of 115
Architectural Review Commission Minutes January 10, 2023
City of Palm Desert Page 2
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER
COLVARD, CARRIED 6-0; to approve the Architectural Review Commission Regular
Meeting minutes of December 13, 2022.
B. CASE NO: SARC22-0007
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a Design
Review for a multi-tenant monument sign for an existing office building located at 73161
Fred Waring Drive.
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Signarama, Palm Desert, CA 92260
LOCATION: 73161 Fred Waring Drive, Suite#200
ZONE: Office Professional (O.P.)
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER
COLVARD, CARRIED 6-0; to approve Case No. SARC22-0007 with the following
condition:
1. All new landscaping shall have a minimum specimen size of 5-gallons.
CONSENT ITEMS HELD OVER: Items removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
discussion will be considered at this time.
None
5. ACTION CALENDAR
Associated staff reports, memos, attachments, and discussion on the following items can be
viewed by visiting the Architectural Review Commission Information Center website at,
https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees-and-commissions/commission-
information.
A. FINAL DRAWINGS
1. CASE NO: MISC22-0043
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a
materials exception for an existing fence in the front yard setback of a single-family
residence located at 77100 Indiana Avenue.
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: Theresa Illare, Palm Desert, CA 92211
LOCATION: 77100 Indiana Avenue
ZONE: Single-Family Residential (R-1)
Assistant Planner, Anna Dan, provided a brief presentation introducing the case and
advised staff is requesting a continuance for this item to a date uncertain. Chair Vuksic
opened and closed the public comment period. No public comments were provided.
Page 10 of 115
Architectural Review Commission Minutes January 10, 2023
City of Palm Desert Page 3
Following discussion, MOTION BY VICE CHAIR MCINTOSH, SECOND BY
COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, CARRIED 6-0; to continue Case No. MISC22-0043
to a date uncertain.
2. CASE NO: MISC21-0023
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Consideration to approve a Design
Review for a four-story, 96-room, 83,106-square-foot Staybridge Suites hotel located
at 74755 Technology Drive (APN 694-190-096)
APPLICANT AND ADDRESS: PVG Architects, Palm Desert, CA 92260
LOCATION: 74755 Technology Drive
ZONE: Planning Area (PA) 5 of Millennium Palm Desert Specific Plan (MPDSP) /
Planned Commercial (PC-2)
Chair Vuksic announced his recusal due to a financial conflict of interest as his firm is
the architect for this item and left the conference room.
Assistant Planner, Nikki Gomez, narrated a PowerPoint presentation on the item and
responded to Commission inquiries. John Greenwood, Applicant, presented additional
details on the project and answered questions from the Commission.
Vice Chair McIntosh opened and closed the public comment period. No public
comments were provided. Discussion on the item ensued with Commissioners
providing comments for the project.
Following discussion, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LATKOVIC, SECOND BY
COMMISSIONER MCAULIFFE, CARRIED 5-0; (CHAIR VUKSIC ABSENT) to
approve Case No. MISC21-0023 with the following conditions:
1. Revisit massing of brown eyebrow element in relation to the top of the parapet as
shown on the south elevation.
2. Provide details for perimeter site wall including color and location of columns. Add
vine plantings along site wall. Site wall colors and materials should complement
and match architecture.
3. Height of pool fence enclosure should be adjusted to meet all health and safety
requirements.
4. Final construction documents shall be reviewed by the ARC for conformance with
the design review and ARC conditions of approval prior to issuance of building
permits.
Chair Vuksic rejoined the meeting after the conclusion of this item.
B. MISCELLANEOUS
None
Page 11 of 115
Architectural Review Commission Minutes January 10, 2023
City of Palm Desert Page 4
6. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS & COMMENTS
A. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSIONERS
In response to inquiry, Deputy Director Lua, provided the following updates and
comments:
• Current, recently implemented, and upcoming housing laws have impacted how
design standards can be applied to projects. The City is currently evaluating how
the upcoming laws will impact the City and its advisory bodies and the potential
for developing objective standards to better align with these laws.
• Case No. PP/CUP22-0006 has been appealed and a public hearing for this item
will be held at the City Council meeting scheduled for January 26, 2023.
• There are no updates regarding SB9 and SB10.
B. CITY STAFF
Deputy Director Lua reported there will be a meeting regarding the North Sphere Park on
January 14, 2023. Recording Secretary Gonzalez added all commissioners received an
email on January 5, 2023, providing information to attend the meeting and a link to the
Engage Palm Desert webpage which provides current information on the North Sphere
Park.
C. ATTENDANCE REPORT
The attendance report was provided with the agenda materials. The Commission took no
action on this matter.
7. ADJOURNMENT
The Architectural Review Commission adjourned at 1:32 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Melinda Gonzalez, Senior Administrative Assistant
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Rosie Lua, Deputy Director of Development Services
Secretary
APPROVED BY ARC: __/__/2023
Page 12 of 115
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission
From: Anna Dan, Assistant Planner
Date: January 24, 2023
Subject: MISC22-0043 – Consideration to approve a height and materials exception for
an existing fence in the front yard setback of a single-family residence located
at 77100 Indiana Avenue.
BACKGROUND
The project is a request for an exception to the fence height, setback, and material requirements
of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.40.080 (Fence and Wall Ordinance). The
Applicant, Theresa Illare, is requesting an exception to allow an existing 5 feet, 2 inches fence
constructed from steel and wood located in the front yard of an existing single-family residence at
77100 Indiana Avenue in the Palm Desert Country Club.
The Fence and Wall Ordinance requires a minimum setback of 20 feet from face of curb for fences
taller than 5 feet. Additionally, the Fence and Wall Ordinance requires that all walls which are
visible from the public right-of-way be constructed from an allowed material including block,
stucco, or wrought iron. As built, the fence does not comply with the height and material
requirements of the Ordinance; however, the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) may grant
exceptions based on existing lot conditions and fence design.
PROJECT SUMMARY
A. Property Description
The project site is an existing single-family residence located at 77100 Indiana Avenue in the
Palm Desert Country Club, built in the 1960’s. The site is comprised of one parcel totaling
0.14-acres (6,098 square feet), containing one single family dwelling unit with a floor area of
approximately 1,770 square-feet. The subject property is zoned R-1 (Single-Family
Residential) which establishes a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet. The area of the
property is approximately 0.14 acres, or 6,098-square feet, which is 24% below the minimum
required lot size.
B. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning Designation
Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations
Existing Uses General Plan Zoning
Project Site Single Family
Residential
Golf Course & Resort
Neighborhood
Single Family Residential
District (R-1)
Page 13 of 115
MISC 22-0043 – 77100 Indiana Avenue Fence Exception
Page 2 of 3
January 24, 2023
North Greenway Golf Course & Resort
Neighborhood
Open Space (O.S.)
South Single Family
Residential
Golf Course & Resort
Neighborhood
Single Family Residential
District (R-1)
East Single Family
Residential
Golf Course & Resort
Neighborhood
Single Family Residential
District (R-1)
West Single Family
Residential
Golf Course & Resort
Neighborhood
Single Family Residential
District (R-1)
C. Project Description
The Applicant is requesting an exception to the height, setback, and material requirements of
the Fence and Wall Ordinance to allow an unpermitted fence in the front yard of their single-
family residence at 77100 Indiana Avenue.
The fence is constructed out of 16-gauge steel painted to match the home and wood panels
finished with an epoxy resin coating. The fence measures 5 feet, 2 inches tall from finished
grade to the top of the post with a minimum setback of 15 feet, 11 inches at one end ranging
to 16 feet, 3 inches. The fence runs 39 feet, 5 inches along the street frontage. The Applicant
is proposing the fence be approved as constructed with the addition of front yard landscaping
in compliance with the Residential Landscaping Provisions Ordinance, Palm Desert Municipal
Code (PDMC) 25.52.030. The landscape plan proposes drought-tolerant plant material
including blue agave (Agave tequiliana), golden barrel cacti (Echinocactus grusonii), and a
Desert Museum Palo Verde (Parkinsonia x Desert Museum) with decomposed granite (DG)
for ground cover. The two existing palm trees will remain in place, and an existing drip
irrigation system will water the landscaping.
Zoning Ordinance Summary
Section 25.40.080 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) requires Architectural Review
Commission (ARC) approval for all fence and wall exceptions. The subject fence is 5 feet, 2 inches
tall, setback a minimum of 15 feet, 11 inches from the face of curb ranging to 16 feet, 3 inches
and constructed out of wood and steel. At a setback of 15 feet, 11 inches, the PDMC permits a
maximum fence height of 4 feet, 11 inches and either block, stucco, or wrought iron material.
Furthermore, all fences adjacent to a public street must provide undulation or a pilaster at least
every 30 linear feet. The fence requires approval of an exception as it exceeds the maximum
height by three inches, and the steel framing and wooden panels are not listed as approved
materials.
Exceptions to the standards of the Ordinance may be granted based on the following findings:
1. That unusual circumstances exist which make the literal interpretation of the standards
impractical or contrary to the purpose of the ordinance codified in this section.
The subject property is zoned R-1, which establishes a minimum lot size of 8,000 square-
feet. The area of the property is approximately 6,098 square-feet, which is 24% below the
minimum requirement and therefore legal non-conforming.
Page 14 of 115
MISC 22-0043 – 77100 Indiana Avenue Fence Exception
Page 3 of 3
January 24, 2023
2. The exception shall not result in damage to adjacent properties.
The exception would not result in damage to adjacent properties. As constructed, the
height and setback of the fence does not encroach into the public right-of-way and does
not impair visibility to adjacent driveways. Additionally, the fence does not adversely affect
scenic vistas for surrounding properties as primary mountain views are located to the east
and west of the site.
3. Property owners adjacent to the proposed exception shall be informed of the application
at least 10 days prior to the ARC meeting.
A notice was sent out to all property owners adjacent to the project site on January 13,
2023, at least 10 days prior to the meeting (Attachment No. 4). At the time of writing this
report, staff has not received any comments from adjacent property owners. The Applicant
also provided staff with an architectural approval letter from the Palm Desert Country Club
Association Board of Directors dated November 17, 2022.
4. Exceptions for nonconforming materials, including wood and vinyl fences, shall be based
on architectural merit and compatibility with the home’s architectural style.
The fence framing is constructed of 16-gauge steel, painted to match the color of the
home, and the wooden panels are finished with an epoxy resin coating for ultraviolet (UV)
and weather resistance. These materials are of construction-grade quality, treated to last,
and compatible with the home’s architecture, a mid-century ranch-style single-family
dwelling unit with wooden siding along the front façade. Wooden fences and gates,
although behind the front yard setback, are typical throughout Indiana Avenue and the
surrounding neighborhood.
The design of the fence deviates from the PDMC as it does not provide undulation or a
pilaster at every 30 feet of linear extent. However, the wooden panel faces are framed and
separated by steel posts at five-foot intervals, which also creates articulation and visual
interest. The addition of the landscaping prevents the wall from appearing plain and
monotonous.
Staff Recommendation.
The ARC must determine if the steel and wood fence proposed has architectural merit and
combability with the home’s architectural style. Staff concludes that the findings to grant a height
and setback exception can be granted for the property based on Findings 1 through 3 and
recommends the ARC grant approval of a height and setback exception for a 5-foot, 2-inch wall
or fence subject to the following conditions of approval:
1. The Applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to City staff incorporating additional
planting materials at the front yard with varying heights to screen the wall.
2. Any modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions of approval.
Attachment: 1. Project Exhibits
2. Site Photos
3. HOA Letter
4. Public Notice dated January 13, 2023
Page 15 of 115
Page 16 of 115
Page 17 of 115
Page 18 of 115
Page 19 of 115
Page 20 of 115
Page 21 of 115
Page 22 of 115
Page 23 of 115
Page 24 of 115
Page 25 of 115
Page 26 of 115
Page 27 of 115
Page 28 of 115
Page 29 of 115
Page 30 of 115
Page 31 of 115
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
CITY OF PALM DESERT
CASE NO. MISC 22-0043
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Development Services Department has received a request for a
height and materials exception to the City of Palm Desert’s Fence and Wall Standards to allow a five-foot-
two-inch-tall wood and steel fence at a setback of 16’-3” from the face of curb in the front yard of a single-
family residence located at 77100 Indiana Avenue. The City’s Fence and Wall Standards are provided
under Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 25.40.080. At a setback of 15’-11”, the Code limits all fences
to a maximum height of 4’-11”. The Code also requires all walls and fences visible from the public right-
of-way to be constructed of decorative block, stucco, or wrought iron. However, exceptions to these
standards may be approved by the City’s Architectural Review Commission.
This notice is being sent to you based on your property’s proximity to the proposed exception. The
proposed fence exception is scheduled for consideration before the Palm Desert Architectural Review
Commission on Tuesday, January 24th, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. via Zoom meeting. The meeting is open to
the public. The agenda for this meeting is available on the City of Palm Desert website at:
https://www.cityofpalmdesert.org/our-city/committees-and-commissions/architectural-review-
commission-information-center
Should you have any questions or comments please contact Ms. Anna Dan, Assistant Planner, by
January 23, 2023, at (760) 776-6309, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through
Friday.
January 13, 2022 Richard D. Cannone, AICP
Director of Development Services
Page 32 of 115
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission
From: Nick Melloni, Senior Planner
Date: January 24, 2023
Case No: PP 22-0004 – Amendment No. 1
Subject: Consideration of an amendment to Precise Plan (PP) 22-0004, revising the
exterior architecture for a 150-unit multi-family residential community on a 6.8-
acre parcel located at 77800 Gerald Ford Drive (APN 694-520-019, and -020).
PROJECT SUMMARY:
The project is a request to modify the approved architecture for a 150-unit affordable apartment
development located at 77800 Gerald Ford Drive by Western National Group (“Applicant”). This
project was approved by the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) and Planning Commission
(PC) under Case No. PP 22-0004. The approved project is comprised of eight (8) three-story
residential buildings, a single-story recreation building, private open space areas, and 270
surface and covered parking spaces.
The proposed modifications are specific to the eight (8) three-story residential buildings which
include:
• Reducing the amount of exterior composite siding and replacing it with stucco.
• Reducing the total number of metal window awnings.
• Replacing interior roof drainage with exterior downspouts on building elevations which do
not face Gerald Ford Drive.
• Changing the color of all vinyl window trim from dark brown to white.
• Removing all private patio walls.
• Removing all metal meshing used to enclose exterior stairwells.
• Revising the design of balcony rails.
• Reducing building projections and changes in building plane.
The proposed modifications will only affect the approved building architecture. No modifications
are proposed to the approved site plan, such as modifications to building size, building location,
change in total number of on-site parking spaces, or relocations. Because the changes will only
affect project architecture, the ARC will be the approving authority for the proposed amendment.
Page 33 of 115
PP 22-0004 – Amendment No.1
Western Nation Group Apartments
Page 2 of 11
January 24, 2023
BACKGROUND
On April 12, 2022, the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) recommended approval of the
project to the Planning Commission in a 5-0 vote, with Commissioner Van Vliet absent, subject to
the following conditions of approval (See Attachment No. 2):
1) Revisit parapets to ensure all ends are concealed and/or returned inward enough to
provide the appearance of a three-dimensional mass;
2) Revisit typical parapet detail and refine the design to demonstrate concealed detail
edges;
3) Staff will confirm flashing details are concealed against clean edges and is included in
construction documents;
4) Landscaping should have provisions in place which ensure it is well maintained and
watered properly;
5) Applicant will be mindful of the need for noise mitigation measures;
6) Applicant shall call for a planning inspection during framing to ensure parapets are
built and concealed as approved and utility equipment is screened appropriately; and
7) Project revisions will be reviewed by staff and return to the ARC should there be any
items that cannot be resolved with Applicant.
On June 7, 2022, the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2813
(Attachment No. 3) approving the project. The conditions of the ARC were incorporated into the
approval resolution under Condition No. 18 and would be reviewed at final construction drawing.
A. Property Description:
The project site is a vacant 6.8-acre property located at 77800 Gerald Ford Drive (Assessor’s
Parcel Numbers 694-520-019, and -020) generally on the east side of Gerald Ford approximately
1,300 feet north of Frank Sinatra Drive. The property is comprised of two (2) contiguous vacant
parcels which have been previously rough graded. The frontage of the parcel has been improved
with roadway, curb, and gutter.
B. Current Zoning & General Plan Land Use Designations:
Table 1 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations
Existing Uses General Plan Zoning
Project Site Vacant Small Town Neighborhood
(STN) 3-10 Dwelling Units
Per Acre
Planned Residential – 19
dwelling units per acre
(PR-19)
North Interstate 10 /
Railroad
Outside City Outside City
South Vacant Public Facility/Institutional Public Institution (P)
East Spanish Walk
Community -
Residential
Condominiums
STN PR-19
West Vacant Employment Service Industrial (SI)
Page 34 of 115
PP 22-0004 – Amendment No.1
Western Nation Group Apartments
Page 3 of 11
January 24, 2023
Project Description
The proposal will modify the exterior architecture of Building Types “A” and “B” as indicated on
the project plans (Attachment No. 1). The applicant has provided an elevation comparison study
between the approved plans and proposed architecture showing the proposed modifications. The
tables below provide a summary of the changes:
Building Type A
This building type consists of three (3) total 12-unit buildings, totaling 36 units located at the front
of the project. The applicant has proposed a total of 8 modifications:
Table 2 – Summary of Building Type A Changes
Approved Proposed
1. Metal Awnings – The applicant proposes to remove the exterior awnings. These
awnings are located on the front and rear building elevations over second and third
floor windows.
2. Window Colors – The applicant is proposing to change the color of all vinyl
windows from dark brown to white vinyl.
Page 35 of 115
PP 22-0004 – Amendment No.1
Western Nation Group Apartments
Page 4 of 11
January 24, 2023
3. Patio Walls - The applicant is proposing to remove all patio walls enclosing
ground-floor patio areas for all ground-floor residential units.
4. Stair Mesh – The applicant is proposing to remove the metal mesh approved on all
exterior stairwell areas.
Page 36 of 115
PP 22-0004 – Amendment No.1
Western Nation Group Apartments
Page 5 of 11
January 24, 2023
5. Balcony Railings - The applicant is proposing to revise the design of balcony rails
used on second and third story units to vertical railings from the approved
horizontal.
6. Projections - The applicant is proposing to reduce the overhangs and plane change
projections between floors from 1’-6”, 1’-8” and 2’-0” to 1’-0” and 1’-6”.
Page 37 of 115
PP 22-0004 – Amendment No.1
Western Nation Group Apartments
Page 6 of 11
January 24, 2023
7. New utility rooms – The applicant is proposing to add new utility rooms to screen
utilities on side elevations.
Building Type B
This building type consists of five (5) 23-unit buildings totaling 114 units (one unit replaced with a
laundry room in Building No.4). The applicant is proposing the following eight (8) modifications:
Table 3 – Summary of Building Type B Changes
Approved Proposed
1. Vertical Siding – The applicant proposes to reduce the total proportion of
composite siding on the building exterior. The approved composite siding was
Alura Red Rock Falls, or a similar composite. The applicant will use brown colored
stucco as a replacement.
Page 38 of 115
PP 22-0004 – Amendment No.1
Western Nation Group Apartments
Page 7 of 11
January 24, 2023
2. Metal Awnings – The applicant proposes to remove the exterior awnings. These
awnings are located on the front and rear building elevations over second and third
floor windows.
3. Exterior Downspouts – The project was approved with all downspouts located on
interior walls of the building. The applicant is proposing to place downspouts on
the exterior of all building elevations which do not front upon a public street.
4. Window Colors – The applicant is proposing to change the color of all vinyl
windows from dark brown to white vinyl.
Page 39 of 115
PP 22-0004 – Amendment No.1
Western Nation Group Apartments
Page 8 of 11
January 24, 2023
5. Patio Walls - The applicant is proposing to remove all patio walls enclosing
ground-floor patio areas for all ground-floor residential units.
6. Stair Mesh – The applicant is proposing to remove the metal mesh approved on all
exterior stairwell areas.
7. Balcony Railing - The applicant is proposing to revise the design of balcony rails
used on second and third story units to vertical railings from the approved
horizontal.
Page 40 of 115
PP 22-0004 – Amendment No.1
Western Nation Group Apartments
Page 9 of 11
January 24, 2023
8. Projections - The applicant is proposing to reduce the overhangs and plane change
projections between floors from 1’-6”, 1’-8” and 2’-0” to 1’-0” and 1’-6”.
9. New utility rooms – The applicant is proposing to add new utility rooms to screen
utilities on side elevations.
ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY:
The project was previously reviewed for conformance with the applicable requirements of the
Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) and requirements for the Planned Residential (PR) Zoning
District and found to be consistent. The proposed modifications do not revise the site plan and
therefore the project is consistent with Zoning as previously analyzed.
Page 41 of 115
PP 22-0004 – Amendment No.1
Western Nation Group Apartments
Page 10 of 11
January 24, 2023
ARC approval is required for all Precise Plan applications per PDMC Section 25.68.020 (A).
Findings for ARC decisions are listed under PDMC Section 25.68.040 – Findings of the ARC.
Findings in support of the project are listed below:
To approve a design review application, the ARC shall find the following:
A. That the proposed development conforms to any legally adopted development standards.
The project was previously approved, the proposed changes do not affect the project’s
conformance with the legally adopted development standards set forth by the PDMC for
the Planned Residential Zoning Designation.
B. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to
neighboring existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair
the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; and that it will not
unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed
developments and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion.
The proposed modifications do not affect the architectural character of the project or its
relationship to existing or proposed development in the area. The changes do not alter
the area, massing, height, or intensity of development on the site. The proposed
modifications will affect the exterior material palette but will not impair the desirability of
investment or occupation in the neighborhood and will not unreasonably interfere with the
use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or proposed developments and will not create
traffic hazards or congestion.
C. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious,
orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this title and the General Plan of the
City.
The architectural modifications to the proposed development do not adversely affect the
compatibility of project with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not
detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by the
zoning Code and General Plan.
D. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of
good composition, materials, textures, and colors.
The proposed modifications alter the exterior material palette of the project by scaling
back windows, exterior wall cladding, and metal awnings. The design still utilizes high-
quality finishes and features a quality contemporary design characterized by articulated
building forms, varying building materials and textures, varying rooflines, balconies, and
desert compatible colors. The buildings will provide for a quality visual aesthetic along
Gerald Ford Drive.
Page 42 of 115
PP 22-0004 – Amendment No.1
Western Nation Group Apartments
Page 11 of 11
January 24, 2023
E. That the proposed use conforms to all the requirements of the zone in which it is located
and all other applicable requirements.
The proposed modifications to the project do not affect the project’s conformance with
legally adopted development standards set forth by the Palm Desert Municipal Code for
the PR zoning district.
F. That the overall development of the land shall be designed to ensure the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare.
The proposed modifications consist of exterior material changes and will not adversely
affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. All changes shall be designed to
comply with applicable Health and Safety Codes.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the ARC determines that the requirements of the Findings have been met
based on the analysis. Staff recommends the ARC condition the project as follows:
1. The applicant shall provide a minimum 42-inch wall to enclose the patios of all ground
floor apartment units of Building Type A, which are adjacent to Gerald Ford Drive, and
visible from internal drive aisles. Other private patios shall be enclosed by use of a 42-
inch block wall, 42-inch railing, or permanently maintained 42-inch hedge, which shall be
reviewed by the ARC at final construction drawings.
2. Where the metal mesh is removed from external stairwells, the applicant shall provide a
minimum thickness of 18 inches around the border of the area where the mesh was
removed. The applicant shall provide appropriate details illustrating the modification,
including cross sections, on the final construction drawings.
3. All balconies shall include material elements to screen storage of personal items by
residents.
4. The final construction drawings shall return to an ARC subcommittee for final acceptance
and substantial conformance review.
Additionally, staff recommends that the ARC incorporate any additional modifications as
conditions of approval.
Attachment:
1. Project Exhibits from the Applicant
2. ARC Notice of Action for April 14, 2022.
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2813.
Page 43 of 115
WNG PALM DESERT
ELEVATION COMPARISON STUDY
JANUARY 09 , 2023
Page 44 of 115
WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
WESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA # 2021-050
ELEVATION COMPARISON STUDY
JANUARY 09, 2023
A-1.18’0’16’32’BUILDING TYPE A - ELEVATIONS
AW - 1 S - 1C - 1 W - 1 PM - 1 R - 1
FRONT
28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"17'-9"14'-9"28'-0"
LAUNDRY
REC BUILDING
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 1
EVA
REC AREA
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 2
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 3
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 4
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 5
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 6
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 7
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 8
UTILITY EASEMENT
28'-2"95'-6"105'-11"86'-0"GERALD FORD DRIVECARPOT, TYP.TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP.
26'-5"42'-6"EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND SWITCH GEAR,
TO BE ABANDONDED OR RELOCATED 28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"23'-0"15'-0"28'-0"
A R C H I T E C T S
N0'30'15' 60'WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 09/13/2021
A-0.3SITE PLANWESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA# 2021-050
5 5 84267A7A
NARRATIVE OF CHANGES
1 Vertical Siding: The exterior siding remains as previosuly designed at building
A1, A2 & A3. TCA modified the siding in some locations at the interior buildings to
achieve contrast of material and color. Having the color on contrasting materials
(siding/plaster) adds another layer of visual interest to the project.
2 Metal Awnings: Upon further consideration during the design process we
determined the awnings were not an effective shading device due to the orientation
of each building. The scale and the shape of the awning also provided no value to the
overall design intent, therefore, we determined the awnings could be removed.
6 Stair Mesh: In order to achieve the following, TCA removed the stair mesh:
A- Increase air flow
B- To achieve minimum code requirements for an open stair
C- Visual security purposes
5 Patio Walls: It was determined by the landscape architect that the walls were
interrupting the overall design intent of the free flowing landscape,
therefore they were removed.
4 Windows Color: The dark brown color originally shown on the windows is not a
standard option, therefore, we went with the standard white color option. By providing
recessed windows, we are providing shade and shadow opportunities and depth
perception, therefore, additional color is not required.
3B Exterior Downspouts: Exterior downspout was added at the utility closet at the
inside courtyard only
3A Exterior Downspouts: Internal roof drains to remain in buildings A1, A2, & A3
that front Gerald Ford Drive, but are removed at the remainder of the buildings at the
interior of the project. Exterior downspouts and scuppers were added at buildings 4,
5, 6, 7 & 8. Based on our professional opinion, the external downspouts does not
detract from the overall design intent.
7A Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical elements
C- We modified the horizontal railings to vertical only on buidings: A1, A2, & A3
7B Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical pickets
C- Open railing deck design for visual inspections by management
D- Railing design change occurs only on the interior courtyards & interior streets
8 Minimum Projection: During our structural cordination process, we reduced the
original 1’-6”, 1’-8”, & 2’-0” overhangs to 1’-0” & 1’-6” The differences from TCA’s
perspective still achieves our original design intent. The purpose of doing this is to
provide a more efficient structural system and to have more consistency in the overall
design.
FRONTAPPROVED
PROPOSED FRONT
MATERIAL LEGEND
KEY MAP
S-1 STUCCO
C-1 COMPOSITIVE SIDING
D-1 METAL DOWNSPOUT AND SCUPPER
R-1 COMPOSITIVE RAILING
AW- 1 METAL AWNING
W-1 VINYL WINDOW
PM-1 PERFORATED METAL
Page 45 of 115
WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
WESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA # 2021-050
ELEVATION COMPARISON STUDY
JANUARY 09, 2023
A-1.28’0’16’32’BUILDING TYPE A - ELEVATIONS
S - 1 C - 1W - 1
RIGHT28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"17'-9"14'-9"28'-0"
LAUNDRY
REC BUILDING
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 1
EVA
REC AREA
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 2
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 3
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 4
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 5
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 6
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 7
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 8
UTILITY EASEMENT
28'-2"95'-6"105'-11"86'-0"GERALD FORD DRIVECARPOT, TYP.TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP.
26'-5"42'-6"EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND SWITCH GEAR,
TO BE ABANDONDED OR RELOCATED 28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"23'-0"15'-0"28'-0"
A R C H I T E C T S
N0'30'15' 60'WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 09/13/2021
A-0.3SITE PLANWESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA# 2021-050
4 8 3B
NARRATIVE OF CHANGES
1 Vertical Siding: The exterior siding remains as previosuly designed at building
A1, A2 & A3. TCA modified the siding in some locations at the interior buildings to
achieve contrast of material and color. Having the color on contrasting materials
(siding/plaster) adds another layer of visual interest to the project.
2 Metal Awnings: Upon further consideration during the design process we
determined the awnings were not an effective shading device due to the orientation
of each building. The scale and the shape of the awning also provided no value to the
overall design intent, therefore, we determined the awnings could be removed.
6 Stair Mesh: In order to achieve the following, TCA removed the stair mesh:
A- Increase air flow
B- To achieve minimum code requirements for an open stair
C- Visual security purposes
5 Patio Walls: It was determined by the landscape architect that the walls were
interrupting the overall design intent of the free flowing landscape,
therefore they were removed.
4 Windows Color: The dark brown color originally shown on the windows is not a
standard option, therefore, we went with the standard white color option. By providing
recessed windows, we are providing shade and shadow opportunities and depth
perception, therefore, additional color is not required.
3B Exterior Downspouts: Exterior downspout was added at the utility closet at the
inside courtyard only
3A Exterior Downspouts: Internal roof drains to remain in buildings A1, A2, & A3
that front Gerald Ford Drive, but are removed at the remainder of the buildings at the
interior of the project. Exterior downspouts and scuppers were added at buildings 4,
5, 6, 7 & 8. Based on our professional opinion, the external downspouts does not
detract from the overall design intent.
7A Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical elements
C- We modified the horizontal railings to vertical only on buidings: A1, A2, & A3
7B Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical pickets
C- Open railing deck design for visual inspections by management
D- Railing design change occurs only on the interior courtyards & interior streets
8 Minimum Projection: During our structural cordination process, we reduced the
original 1’-6”, 1’-8”, & 2’-0” overhangs to 1’-0” & 1’-6” The differences from TCA’s
perspective still achieves our original design intent. The purpose of doing this is to
provide a more efficient structural system and to have more consistency in the overall
design.
RIGHT
RIGHT
APPROVED
PROPOSED
MATERIAL LEGEND
KEY MAP
S-1 STUCCO
C-1 COMPOSITIVE SIDING
D-1 METAL DOWNSPOUT AND SCUPPER
R-1 COMPOSITIVE RAILING
AW- 1 METAL AWNING
W-1 VINYL WINDOW
PM-1 PERFORATED METAL
Page 46 of 115
WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
WESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA # 2021-050
ELEVATION COMPARISON STUDY
JANUARY 09, 2023
A-1.38’0’16’32’BUILDING TYPE A - ELEVATIONS
S - 1 D - 1C - 1 R - 1W - 1
28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"17'-9"14'-9"28'-0"
LAUNDRY
REC BUILDING
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 1
EVA
REC AREA
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 2
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 3
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 4
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 5
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 6
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 7
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 8
UTILITY EASEMENT
28'-2"95'-6"105'-11"86'-0"GERALD FORD DRIVECARPOT, TYP.TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP.
26'-5"42'-6"EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND SWITCH GEAR,
TO BE ABANDONDED OR RELOCATED 28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"23'-0"15'-0"28'-0"
A R C H I T E C T S
N0'30'15' 60'WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 09/13/2021
A-0.3SITE PLANWESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA# 2021-050
REAR
5514 3B7A
NARRATIVE OF CHANGES
1 Vertical Siding: The exterior siding remains as previosuly designed at building
A1, A2 & A3. TCA modified the siding in some locations at the interior buildings to
achieve contrast of material and color. Having the color on contrasting materials
(siding/plaster) adds another layer of visual interest to the project.
2 Metal Awnings: Upon further consideration during the design process we
determined the awnings were not an effective shading device due to the orientation
of each building. The scale and the shape of the awning also provided no value to the
overall design intent, therefore, we determined the awnings could be removed.
6 Stair Mesh: In order to achieve the following, TCA removed the stair mesh:
A- Increase air flow
B- To achieve minimum code requirements for an open stair
C- Visual security purposes
5 Patio Walls: It was determined by the landscape architect that the walls were
interrupting the overall design intent of the free flowing landscape,
therefore they were removed.
4 Windows Color: The dark brown color originally shown on the windows is not a
standard option, therefore, we went with the standard white color option. By providing
recessed windows, we are providing shade and shadow opportunities and depth
perception, therefore, additional color is not required.
3B Exterior Downspouts: Exterior downspout was added at the utility closet at the
inside courtyard only
3A Exterior Downspouts: Internal roof drains to remain in buildings A1, A2, & A3
that front Gerald Ford Drive, but are removed at the remainder of the buildings at the
interior of the project. Exterior downspouts and scuppers were added at buildings 4,
5, 6, 7 & 8. Based on our professional opinion, the external downspouts does not
detract from the overall design intent.
7A Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical elements
C- We modified the horizontal railings to vertical only on buidings: A1, A2, & A3
7B Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical pickets
C- Open railing deck design for visual inspections by management
D- Railing design change occurs only on the interior courtyards & interior streets
8 Minimum Projection: During our structural cordination process, we reduced the
original 1’-6”, 1’-8”, & 2’-0” overhangs to 1’-0” & 1’-6” The differences from TCA’s
perspective still achieves our original design intent. The purpose of doing this is to
provide a more efficient structural system and to have more consistency in the overall
design.
REAR
REAR
APPROVED
PROPOSED
MATERIAL LEGEND
KEY MAP
S-1 STUCCO
C-1 COMPOSITIVE SIDING
D-1 METAL DOWNSPOUT AND SCUPPER
R-1 COMPOSITIVE RAILING
AW- 1 METAL AWNING
W-1 VINYL WINDOW
PM-1 PERFORATED METAL
Page 47 of 115
WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
WESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA # 2021-050
ELEVATION COMPARISON STUDY
JANUARY 09, 2023
A-1.48’0’16’32’BUILDING TYPE A - ELEVATIONS
S - 1 C - 1W - 1
28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"17'-9"14'-9"28'-0"
LAUNDRY
REC BUILDING
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 1
EVA
REC AREA
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 2
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 3
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 4
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 5
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 6
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 7
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 8
UTILITY EASEMENT
28'-2"95'-6"105'-11"86'-0"GERALD FORD DRIVECARPOT, TYP.TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP.
26'-5"42'-6"EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND SWITCH GEAR,
TO BE ABANDONDED OR RELOCATED 28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"23'-0"15'-0"28'-0"
A R C H I T E C T S
N0'30'15' 60'WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 09/13/2021
A-0.3SITE PLANWESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA# 2021-050 LEFT4 3B
NARRATIVE OF CHANGES
1 Vertical Siding: The exterior siding remains as previosuly designed at building
A1, A2 & A3. TCA modified the siding in some locations at the interior buildings to
achieve contrast of material and color. Having the color on contrasting materials
(siding/plaster) adds another layer of visual interest to the project.
2 Metal Awnings: Upon further consideration during the design process we
determined the awnings were not an effective shading device due to the orientation
of each building. The scale and the shape of the awning also provided no value to the
overall design intent, therefore, we determined the awnings could be removed.
6 Stair Mesh: In order to achieve the following, TCA removed the stair mesh:
A- Increase air flow
B- To achieve minimum code requirements for an open stair
C- Visual security purposes
5 Patio Walls: It was determined by the landscape architect that the walls were
interrupting the overall design intent of the free flowing landscape,
therefore they were removed.
4 Windows Color: The dark brown color originally shown on the windows is not a
standard option, therefore, we went with the standard white color option. By providing
recessed windows, we are providing shade and shadow opportunities and depth
perception, therefore, additional color is not required.
3B Exterior Downspouts: Exterior downspout was added at the utility closet at the
inside courtyard only
3A Exterior Downspouts: Internal roof drains to remain in buildings A1, A2, & A3
that front Gerald Ford Drive, but are removed at the remainder of the buildings at the
interior of the project. Exterior downspouts and scuppers were added at buildings 4,
5, 6, 7 & 8. Based on our professional opinion, the external downspouts does not
detract from the overall design intent.
7A Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical elements
C- We modified the horizontal railings to vertical only on buidings: A1, A2, & A3
7B Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical pickets
C- Open railing deck design for visual inspections by management
D- Railing design change occurs only on the interior courtyards & interior streets
8 Minimum Projection: During our structural cordination process, we reduced the
original 1’-6”, 1’-8”, & 2’-0” overhangs to 1’-0” & 1’-6” The differences from TCA’s
perspective still achieves our original design intent. The purpose of doing this is to
provide a more efficient structural system and to have more consistency in the overall
design.
LEFT
LEFT
APPROVED
PROPOSED
MATERIAL LEGEND
KEY MAP
S-1 STUCCO
C-1 COMPOSITIVE SIDING
D-1 METAL DOWNSPOUT AND SCUPPER
R-1 COMPOSITIVE RAILING
AW- 1 METAL AWNING
W-1 VINYL WINDOW
PM-1 PERFORATED METAL
Page 48 of 115
WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
WESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA # 2021-050
ELEVATION COMPARISON STUDY
JANUARY 09, 2023
A-1.58’0’16’32’BUILDING TYPE B - ELEVATIONS
S - 1 S - 1C - 1 W - 1 PM - 1R - 1
FRONT
28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"17'-9"14'-9"28'-0"
LAUNDRY
REC BUILDING
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 1
EVA
REC AREA
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 2
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 3
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 4
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 5
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 6
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 7
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 8
UTILITY EASEMENT
28'-2"95'-6"105'-11"86'-0"GERALD FORD DRIVECARPOT, TYP.TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP.
26'-5"42'-6"EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND SWITCH GEAR,
TO BE ABANDONDED OR RELOCATED 28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"23'-0"15'-0"28'-0"
A R C H I T E C T S
N0'30'15' 60'WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 09/13/2021
A-0.3SITE PLANWESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA# 2021-050
4411 166155 537B7B7B
NARRATIVE OF CHANGES
1 Vertical Siding: The exterior siding remains as previosuly designed at building
A1, A2 & A3. TCA modified the siding in some locations at the interior buildings to
achieve contrast of material and color. Having the color on contrasting materials
(siding/plaster) adds another layer of visual interest to the project.
2 Metal Awnings: Upon further consideration during the design process we
determined the awnings were not an effective shading device due to the orientation
of each building. The scale and the shape of the awning also provided no value to the
overall design intent, therefore, we determined the awnings could be removed.
6 Stair Mesh: In order to achieve the following, TCA removed the stair mesh:
A- Increase air flow
B- To achieve minimum code requirements for an open stair
C- Visual security purposes
5 Patio Walls: It was determined by the landscape architect that the walls were
interrupting the overall design intent of the free flowing landscape,
therefore they were removed.
4 Windows Color: The dark brown color originally shown on the windows is not a
standard option, therefore, we went with the standard white color option. By providing
recessed windows, we are providing shade and shadow opportunities and depth
perception, therefore, additional color is not required.
3B Exterior Downspouts: Exterior downspout was added at the utility closet at the
inside courtyard only
3A Exterior Downspouts: Internal roof drains to remain in buildings A1, A2, & A3
that front Gerald Ford Drive, but are removed at the remainder of the buildings at the
interior of the project. Exterior downspouts and scuppers were added at buildings 4,
5, 6, 7 & 8. Based on our professional opinion, the external downspouts does not
detract from the overall design intent.
7A Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical elements
C- We modified the horizontal railings to vertical only on buidings: A1, A2, & A3
7B Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical pickets
C- Open railing deck design for visual inspections by management
D- Railing design change occurs only on the interior courtyards & interior streets
8 Minimum Projection: During our structural cordination process, we reduced the
original 1’-6”, 1’-8”, & 2’-0” overhangs to 1’-0” & 1’-6” The differences from TCA’s
perspective still achieves our original design intent. The purpose of doing this is to
provide a more efficient structural system and to have more consistency in the overall
design.
FRONT
FRONT
APPROVED
PROPOSED
MATERIAL LEGEND
KEY MAP
S-1 STUCCO
C-1 COMPOSITIVE SIDING
D-1 METAL DOWNSPOUT AND SCUPPER
R-1 COMPOSITIVE RAILING
AW- 1 METAL AWNING
W-1 VINYL WINDOW
PM-1 PERFORATED METAL
Page 49 of 115
WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
WESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA # 2021-050
ELEVATION COMPARISON STUDY
JANUARY 09, 2023
A-1.68’0’16’32’BUILDING TYPE B - ELEVATIONS
S - 1C - 1 W - 1
RIGHT28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"17'-9"14'-9"28'-0"
LAUNDRY
REC BUILDING
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 1
EVA
REC AREA
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 2
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 3
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 4
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 5
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 6
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 7
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 8
UTILITY EASEMENT
28'-2"95'-6"105'-11"86'-0"GERALD FORD DRIVECARPOT, TYP.TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP.
26'-5"42'-6"EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND SWITCH GEAR,
TO BE ABANDONDED OR RELOCATED 28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"23'-0"15'-0"28'-0"
A R C H I T E C T S
N0'30'15' 60'WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 09/13/2021
A-0.3SITE PLANWESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA# 2021-050
4 41
NARRATIVE OF CHANGES
1 Vertical Siding: The exterior siding remains as previosuly designed at building
A1, A2 & A3. TCA modified the siding in some locations at the interior buildings to
achieve contrast of material and color. Having the color on contrasting materials
(siding/plaster) adds another layer of visual interest to the project.
2 Metal Awnings: Upon further consideration during the design process we
determined the awnings were not an effective shading device due to the orientation
of each building. The scale and the shape of the awning also provided no value to the
overall design intent, therefore, we determined the awnings could be removed.
6 Stair Mesh: In order to achieve the following, TCA removed the stair mesh:
A- Increase air flow
B- To achieve minimum code requirements for an open stair
C- Visual security purposes
5 Patio Walls: It was determined by the landscape architect that the walls were
interrupting the overall design intent of the free flowing landscape,
therefore they were removed.
4 Windows Color: The dark brown color originally shown on the windows is not a
standard option, therefore, we went with the standard white color option. By providing
recessed windows, we are providing shade and shadow opportunities and depth
perception, therefore, additional color is not required.
3B Exterior Downspouts: Exterior downspout was added at the utility closet at the
inside courtyard only
3A Exterior Downspouts: Internal roof drains to remain in buildings A1, A2, & A3
that front Gerald Ford Drive, but are removed at the remainder of the buildings at the
interior of the project. Exterior downspouts and scuppers were added at buildings 4,
5, 6, 7 & 8. Based on our professional opinion, the external downspouts does not
detract from the overall design intent.
7A Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical elements
C- We modified the horizontal railings to vertical only on buidings: A1, A2, & A3
7B Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical pickets
C- Open railing deck design for visual inspections by management
D- Railing design change occurs only on the interior courtyards & interior streets
8 Minimum Projection: During our structural cordination process, we reduced the
original 1’-6”, 1’-8”, & 2’-0” overhangs to 1’-0” & 1’-6” The differences from TCA’s
perspective still achieves our original design intent. The purpose of doing this is to
provide a more efficient structural system and to have more consistency in the overall
design.
RIGHT
RIGHT
APPROVED
PROPOSED
MATERIAL LEGEND
KEY MAP
S-1 STUCCO
C-1 COMPOSITIVE SIDING
D-1 METAL DOWNSPOUT AND SCUPPER
R-1 COMPOSITIVE RAILING
AW- 1 METAL AWNING
W-1 VINYL WINDOW
PM-1 PERFORATED METAL
Page 50 of 115
WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
WESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA # 2021-050
ELEVATION COMPARISON STUDY
JANUARY 09, 2023
A-1.78’0’16’32’BUILDING TYPE B - ELEVATIONS
S - 1D - 1 C - 1W - 1R - 1
28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"17'-9"14'-9"28'-0"
LAUNDRY
REC BUILDING
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 1
EVA
REC AREA
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 2
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 3
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 4
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 5
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 6
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 7
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 8
UTILITY EASEMENT
28'-2"95'-6"105'-11"86'-0"GERALD FORD DRIVECARPOT, TYP.TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP.
26'-5"42'-6"EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND SWITCH GEAR,
TO BE ABANDONDED OR RELOCATED 28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"23'-0"15'-0"28'-0"
A R C H I T E C T S
N0'30'15' 60'WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 09/13/2021
A-0.3SITE PLANWESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA# 2021-050
REAR
1 3 3 1114557B7B7B
NARRATIVE OF CHANGES
1 Vertical Siding: The exterior siding remains as previosuly designed at building
A1, A2 & A3. TCA modified the siding in some locations at the interior buildings to
achieve contrast of material and color. Having the color on contrasting materials
(siding/plaster) adds another layer of visual interest to the project.
2 Metal Awnings: Upon further consideration during the design process we
determined the awnings were not an effective shading device due to the orientation
of each building. The scale and the shape of the awning also provided no value to the
overall design intent, therefore, we determined the awnings could be removed.
6 Stair Mesh: In order to achieve the following, TCA removed the stair mesh:
A- Increase air flow
B- To achieve minimum code requirements for an open stair
C- Visual security purposes
5 Patio Walls: It was determined by the landscape architect that the walls were
interrupting the overall design intent of the free flowing landscape,
therefore they were removed.
4 Windows Color: The dark brown color originally shown on the windows is not a
standard option, therefore, we went with the standard white color option. By providing
recessed windows, we are providing shade and shadow opportunities and depth
perception, therefore, additional color is not required.
3B Exterior Downspouts: Exterior downspout was added at the utility closet at the
inside courtyard only
3A Exterior Downspouts: Internal roof drains to remain in buildings A1, A2, & A3
that front Gerald Ford Drive, but are removed at the remainder of the buildings at the
interior of the project. Exterior downspouts and scuppers were added at buildings 4,
5, 6, 7 & 8. Based on our professional opinion, the external downspouts does not
detract from the overall design intent.
7A Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical elements
C- We modified the horizontal railings to vertical only on buidings: A1, A2, & A3
7B Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical pickets
C- Open railing deck design for visual inspections by management
D- Railing design change occurs only on the interior courtyards & interior streets
8 Minimum Projection: During our structural cordination process, we reduced the
original 1’-6”, 1’-8”, & 2’-0” overhangs to 1’-0” & 1’-6” The differences from TCA’s
perspective still achieves our original design intent. The purpose of doing this is to
provide a more efficient structural system and to have more consistency in the overall
design.
REAR
REAR
APPROVED
PROPOSED
MATERIAL LEGEND
KEY MAP
S-1 STUCCO
C-1 COMPOSITIVE SIDING
D-1 METAL DOWNSPOUT AND SCUPPER
R-1 COMPOSITIVE RAILING
AW- 1 METAL AWNING
W-1 VINYL WINDOW
PM-1 PERFORATED METAL
Page 51 of 115
WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
WESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA # 2021-050
ELEVATION COMPARISON STUDY
JANUARY 09, 2023
A-1.88’0’16’32’BUILDING TYPE B - ELEVATIONS
S - 1C - 1W - 1
28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"17'-9"14'-9"28'-0"
LAUNDRY
REC BUILDING
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 1
EVA
REC AREA
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 2
BLDG TYPE A
BLDG 3
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 4
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 5
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 6
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 7
BLDG TYPE B
BLDG 8
UTILITY EASEMENT
28'-2"95'-6"105'-11"86'-0"GERALD FORD DRIVECARPOT, TYP.TRASH ENCLOSURE, TYP.
26'-5"42'-6"EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND SWITCH GEAR,
TO BE ABANDONDED OR RELOCATED 28'-0"28'-0"28'-0"23'-0"15'-0"28'-0"
A R C H I T E C T S
N0'30'15' 60'WNG PALM DESERT
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 09/13/2021
A-0.3SITE PLANWESTERN NATIONAL
GROUP
TCA# 2021-050 LEFT1 4
NARRATIVE OF CHANGES
1 Vertical Siding: The exterior siding remains as previosuly designed at building
A1, A2 & A3. TCA modified the siding in some locations at the interior buildings to
achieve contrast of material and color. Having the color on contrasting materials
(siding/plaster) adds another layer of visual interest to the project.
2 Metal Awnings: Upon further consideration during the design process we
determined the awnings were not an effective shading device due to the orientation
of each building. The scale and the shape of the awning also provided no value to the
overall design intent, therefore, we determined the awnings could be removed.
6 Stair Mesh: In order to achieve the following, TCA removed the stair mesh:
A- Increase air flow
B- To achieve minimum code requirements for an open stair
C- Visual security purposes
5 Patio Walls: It was determined by the landscape architect that the walls were
interrupting the overall design intent of the free flowing landscape,
therefore they were removed.
4 Windows Color: The dark brown color originally shown on the windows is not a
standard option, therefore, we went with the standard white color option. By providing
recessed windows, we are providing shade and shadow opportunities and depth
perception, therefore, additional color is not required.
3B Exterior Downspouts: Exterior downspout was added at the utility closet at the
inside courtyard only
3A Exterior Downspouts: Internal roof drains to remain in buildings A1, A2, & A3
that front Gerald Ford Drive, but are removed at the remainder of the buildings at the
interior of the project. Exterior downspouts and scuppers were added at buildings 4,
5, 6, 7 & 8. Based on our professional opinion, the external downspouts does not
detract from the overall design intent.
7A Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical elements
C- We modified the horizontal railings to vertical only on buidings: A1, A2, & A3
7B Balcony rails: In order to achieve the following, TCA revised the balcony railings:
A- Concerns over climability with a horizontal railing
B- Durability of horizontal material with twisting and fading which will not happen with
vertical pickets
C- Open railing deck design for visual inspections by management
D- Railing design change occurs only on the interior courtyards & interior streets
8 Minimum Projection: During our structural cordination process, we reduced the
original 1’-6”, 1’-8”, & 2’-0” overhangs to 1’-0” & 1’-6” The differences from TCA’s
perspective still achieves our original design intent. The purpose of doing this is to
provide a more efficient structural system and to have more consistency in the overall
design.
LEFT
LEFT
APPROVED
PROPOSED
MATERIAL LEGEND
KEY MAP
S-1 STUCCO
C-1 COMPOSITIVE SIDING
D-1 METAL DOWNSPOUT AND SCUPPER
R-1 COMPOSITIVE RAILING
AW- 1 METAL AWNING
W-1 VINYL WINDOW
PM-1 PERFORATED METAL
Page 52 of 115
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
NOTICE OF ACTION
April 22, 2022
Western National Group
8 Executive Circle
Irvine, CA 92614
Subject: Consideration of a recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of
a Precise Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and a Notice of Exemption to construct a 150-unit
multi-family (affordable housing) residential community consisting of eight (8) three-story
apartment buildings, a single-story clubhouse, and private outdoor recreation areas on an
6.8-acre parcel adjacent to Spanish Walk along the east side of Gerald Ford Drive, north of
Frank Sinatra Drive, and south of the I-10/Railroad.
The Architectural Review Commission of the City of Palm Desert considered your request and
took the following action at its meeting of April 12, 2022:
By Minute Motion, the Architectural Review Commission approved Case No. PP/CUP22-0004
subject to the following: 1) Revisit parapets to ensure all ends are concealed and/or returned
inward enough to provide the appearance of a three-dimensional mass; 2) Revisit typical parapet
detail and refine the design to demonstrate concealed detail edges; 3) Staff will confirm flashing
details are concealed against clean edges and is included in construction documents; 4)
Landscaping should have provisions in place which ensure it is well maintained and watered
properly; 5) Applicant will be mindful of the need for noise mitigation measures; 6) Applicant shall
call for a planning inspection during framing to ensure parapets are built and concealed as
approved and utility equipment is screened appropriately; and 7) Project revisions will be reviewed
by staff and return to the ARC should there be any items that cannot be resolved with Applicant.
The motion carried with a 5-0 vote. (AYES: Lambell, Latkovic, McAuliffe, McIntosh, and Vuksic;
NOES: None; ABSENT: Van Vliet).
Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert
within 15 days of the date of the decision.
If you have any questions, please contact Associate Planner, Kevin Swartz, at (760) 346-0611,
Extension 485 or kswartz@cityofpalmdesert.org.
Sincerely,
ROSIE LUA, SECRETARY
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION
cc: File
Page 53 of 115
Page 54 of 115
Page 55 of 115
Page 56 of 115
Page 57 of 115
Page 58 of 115
Page 59 of 115
Page 60 of 115
Page 61 of 115
Page 62 of 115
Page 63 of 115
Page 64 of 115
Page 65 of 115
Page 66 of 115
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission
From: Nikki Gomez, Assistant Planner
Date: January 24, 2023
Subject: SARC22-0004 – 72740 El Paseo – Request for approval of a comprehensive
sign program for exterior signage for the Palms to Pines West Shopping
Center.
PROJECT SUMMARY:
The proposed project is a request for a new comprehensive sign program for an existing shopping
center, known as “Palms to Pines West”, which is generally located south of Highway 111 north
of El Paseo, and west of Highway 74. The proposed comprehensive sign program provides
guidelines for design standards to ensure consistency with the quality, number of colors, size,
placement, and configuration of permanent and temporary signage within the “Palms to Pines
West” (Shopping Center). The sign program will establish signage guidelines for three (3) signage
types:
• Major Tenants
• Shop Tenants
• Monument signage
The site plan (Figure 1) below shows the multi-tenant building and monument signs applicable to
the proposed sign program. It shows the two (2) major tenants, 17 shop tenants and three (3)
monument signages within the shopping center. The site plan also shows the location and
orientation of monument signage on El Paseo and Highway 111.
Page 67 of 115
SARC22-0004 – Palms to Pines West
Page 2 of 8
January 24, 2023
Figure 1: Site Plan
Major Tenants:
Major tenants are identified as a tenant that occupies a tenant space greater than 18,000 square
feet within the Shopping Center. The proposed major tenants are Ross Dress for Less (Major 1)
and Grocery Outlet (Major 2). The major tenant spaces are setback approximately 420 feet from
the Highway 111 right-of-way. Table 1 summarizes the allowed signage requirements for the
major tenants. Each major tenant is allowed one (1) primary business identification sign and up
to two (2) secondary signs. Major tenants are allowed a maximum sign area equal to one (1)
square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of tenant frontage up to a maximum of 111 square
feet. However, the major tenants are requesting to exceed this requirement with Ross Dress for
Less sign area at 149.38 square feet and Grocery Outlet sign area at 121.01 square feet. Under
the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC), business identification signs of more than 100 feet of
frontage and more than 100 feet from public Right of Way (ROW), requires Architectural Review
Commission (ARC) approval.
Page 68 of 115
SARC22-0004 – Palms to Pines West
Page 3 of 8
January 24, 2023
Table 1: Major Tenants
Standard PDMC Permanent Sign
Requirement
Proposed Sign Program Conforms
Allowed
Sign Types
Flush Mounted Wall Sign Flush Mounted Wall Sign Yes
Maximum
Number
One Per Building Frontage One Per Building Frontage Yes
Maximum
Sign Area
Max sign area as approved
by ARC
1 square foot of sign area for
each linear foot of tenant
building frontage – Maximum
111 square feet
Major 1 (Ross Dress for
Less) - 149.38 square feet
Major 2 (Grocery Outlet) -
121.01 square feet
Upon
approval by
ARC
Maximum
Sign Height
Below eave line of building
and not higher than 20 feet
Below eave line of building
and 19.6 feet
Yes
Location ARC Approval more than 100
feet from public ROW
Main Entrance Frontage Upon
approval by
ARC
Lighting
Allowed
Yes Yes Yes
The proposed secondary signs are applicable to the major tenants of the shopping center.
Table 2: Secondary Signs
Standard PDMC Permanent Sign
Requirement
Proposed Sign Program Conforms
Allowed
Sign Types
Flush Mounted Wall Sign Flush Mounted Wall Sign Yes
Maximum
Number
2 per business maximum sign
area allowed for business
Up to 2 secondary signs per
major tenant.
Yes
Maximum
Sign Area
The total aggregate sign area
of the secondary sign(s)
together with the primary sign
shall not exceed the
maximum sign area allowed
for the business which
requires ARC Approval
Included in maximum total
sign area per tenant.
Upon ARC
Approval
Page 69 of 115
SARC22-0004 – Palms to Pines West
Page 4 of 8
January 24, 2023
Maximum
Sign Height
Below eave line of building
and not higher than 20 feet
Below eave line of building
and 17 feet
Yes
Location ARC Approval more than 100
feet from public ROW
Main Entrance Frontage
Upon
approval by
ARC
Lighting
Allowed
Yes Yes
Yes
The proposed secondary signs proposed for the major tenants comply with the PDMC as they
are architecturally consisted with the main identification sign and are limited to two (2) secondary
signs with no phone numbers.
Shop Tenants:
Shop tenants are identified as a tenant that occupies equal to or greater than 900 square feet and
less than 3,325 square feet of space within the shopping center. The commercial building also
consists of seventeen (17) shop tenants. Table 3 below summarizes the proposed sign program
compared to the PDMC. The proposed signage allows shop tenants one (1) sign on one elevation
and one (1) additional sign on the side (if the unit is an end or corner unit). The shop tenants are
allowed a sign area of one (1) square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of building frontage
resulting in a maximum of 32.6 square feet. Each shop tenant signage will vary depending on the
linear foot of the tenant building frontage. The proposed sign area of 32.6 square feet is within
the 75 square foot sign area allowed by the PDMC Business Identification sign ordinance. All
tenant shop signs are limited to three (3) colors.
Table 3: Shop Tenants
Standard PDMC Permanent Sign
Requirement
Proposed Sign Program Conforms
Allowed Sign Types Flush Mounted Wall
Sign
Flush Mounted Wall Sign Yes
Maximum Number 1 per tenant frontage 1 per tenant frontage Yes
Maximum Sign
Area
1.5 sq. ft. of sign area
per linear foot of
building frontage with
maximum sign area 75
square feet
Up to 1 square foot of sign
area for each lineal foot of
tenant suite frontage or within
maximum envelope,
whichever is lesser.
Yes
Maximum Sign
Height
Below eave line of
building and not higher
than 20 feet
10 feet 6 inches Yes
Location ARC Approval more
than 100 feet from
public ROW
Main Entrance Frontage Yes
Lighting Allowed Yes All primary signs must be
interior-illuminated and shall
include a dimmer switch to
minimize glare.
Yes
Page 70 of 115
SARC22-0004 – Palms to Pines West
Page 5 of 8
January 24, 2023
Monument Signage:
The shopping center has three (3) existing monument signs. One sign is located at the primary
entrance on Highway 111 and the other two (2) monument signs are located along El Paseo. The
sign program proposes to modify existing monument signs to allow up to four (4) tenant panels.
Each tenant panel is designs as an internally illuminated cabinet with routed push-through letters.
There will be no increase in height or width. The monument sign (M1) along Highway 111 is
proposed to have three (3) tenant panels with up to two lines of copy. The monument sign (M2)
along El Paseo is proposed to have four (4) tenant panels. The sign program proposes for the
monument sign to be internally illuminated in conjunction with the existing external illumination.
The space on the monument signs will be allocated to tenants based on request to the landlord
for more customer visibility.
Table 4: Monument Signage
Standard PDMC Permanent Sign
Requirement
Proposed Sign Program Conforms
Allowed Sign
Types
Freestanding Monument
Sign
Existing Freestanding
Monument Sign
Yes
Maximum
Number
One per street frontage 3 existing monument signs Yes
Maximum Sign
Area
10 sq. ft. per acre of
subject site. The sign
area of the monument
sign shall be in addition
to the allowed sign area
for the building with the
maximum sign area of
100 square.
32.25 square feet total sign
area (approximately 8.36
square feet per line item)
Yes
Maximum Height 6 feet 6 feet Yes
Lighting Allowed Lighting Allowed Internally and externally
illuminated
Yes
The sign program also identifies the submittal and approval process to the City, fabrication
requirements, sign dimensions, area calculations, and the prohibited signs in the shopping center.
BACKGROUND
A. Property Description:
The project site is a 6.93-acre parcel located at 72740 El Paseo Drive (APN 640-160-020 & 004),
on the south side of Highway 111 and north of El Paseo Drive. The site is developed with a one-
story multi-tenant shopping center originally constructed in 1982. On June 9, 2020, the
Architectural Review Commission (ARC) approved MISC19-0030 approving a design review for
the facade enhancement of the Palms to Pines West shopping center which is incorporated in the
proposed sign program.
Page 71 of 115
SARC22-0004 – Palms to Pines West
Page 6 of 8
January 24, 2023
B. Current Zoning & General Plan Land Use Designations:
Table 5 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations
Location Existing Uses General Plan Zoning
Project Site Commercial
Center
Regional Center PC 3, SP - Regional
Commercial Center,
Scenic Preservation
Overlay District
North Shops in Palm
Desert
Regional Center PC 3, SP - Regional
Commercial Center,
Scenic Preservation
Overlay District
South Multifamily
Residential
Small Town Neighborhood PR-6, Planned Residential
East Commercial
Center
Regional Center PC 3, SP - Regional
Commercial Center,
Scenic Preservation
Overlay District
West Commercial
Center
Regional Center PC 3, SP- Regional
Commercial Center,
Scenic Preservation
Overlay District
ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY
Palm Desert Municipal Code Section (PDMC) 25.56.100 (B)(4) establishes that ARC approval of
a comprehensive sign program is required whenever an existing multi-tenant development of
three (3) or more tenants is remodeled. The sign program proposes for two new major tenants,
new guidelines for existing shop tenants, and proposed additional tenant spaces on the existing
monument signs.
ARC approval is required for all comprehensive sign programs per Palm Desert Municipal Code
(PDMC) Section 25.56.100 (E). To approve a sign program the ARC shall make the following
findings:
A comprehensive sign program shall comply with the following standards:
1. The proposed sign program shall comply with the purpose and intent of this chapter.
The purpose and intent of Chapter 25.56 (Sign Ordinance) is to provide for visually
attractive signage, which affords each user adequate identification while guarding against
excessive advertising. The proposed sign program ensures that signs are in harmony with
the building and neighboring signs. The shopping center has an approved facade
improvement under MISC19-0030 which allows the space along the building facia to
accommodate the proposed major and shop tenant signage. The proposed sign program
is necessary for the tenant’s business and as proposed, ensures each sign is proportional
to the scale of building. The sign program ensures that all tenants will be in proportion
against the building facia by establishing the maximum size area and ensuring that all
shop tenant sign will be interior-illuminated and shall include a dimmer switch to help
Page 72 of 115
SARC22-0004 – Palms to Pines West
Page 7 of 8
January 24, 2023
control excess lighting. The major tenants are accommodated to ensure visibility from
Highway 111 while keeping in proportion with each other by alignment with the widths and
heights. The monument sign will be modified to consistently show up to four (4) tenant
signs with internal illumination.
2. The proposed signs shall enhance the overall development, be in harmony with, and relate
visually to other signs included in the comprehensive sign program, to the structures
and/or developments they identify, and to surrounding development when applicable.
The proposed signage enhances the overall development by providing for the orderly
design, placement, quantity, size area, illumination, and number of colors between the
shop tenants and major tenants. The signs are compatible in scale with each other and
the area of the fascia where they are placed. The signs use a similar construction and
illumination to remain visually consistent.
3. The sign program shall address all signs, including permanent, temporary, and exempt
signs.
The sign program addresses the permanent signs for major tenants (page 10), shop
tenants (page 14), monument signs (page 17) and prohibited signs on page 8. The
applicant has not identified exempt sign but has included that each tenant must fulfill all
requirements of the City of Palm Desert under Submittal & Approval process (page 4).
4. The sign program shall accommodate future revisions that may be required because of
changes in use or tenants.
The sign program shows the placement of signs on the building and provides specific
maximum area limitations for each sign. The placement, size, and construction of the signs
can be referenced or updated should the tenant request modifications in the future. The
sign program includes a specific request for the main sign area for current major tenants
M1 (Ross Dress for Less) of 149.38 square feet and M2 (Grocery Outlet) to 121.01 square
feet. These proposed sign areas only apply to these current tenants. The sign program
establishes the base sign area for major tenants of 111 square feet.
5. The sign program shall comply with the standards of this chapter, except that deviations
are allowed with regard to sign area, total number, location, and/or height of signs to the
extent that the comprehensive sign program will enhance the overall development and will
more fully accomplish the purposes and intent of this chapter.
The proposed sign program complies with the standards of this chapter. The proposed
program provides for two types of tenant signs, one for major tenants summarized under
Table 1 with secondary signs under Table 2, shop tenants summarized under Table 3,
and monument signs under Table 4 demonstrating consistency with the PDMC. The sign
program is proposing a deviation of the maximum sign area of the major tenants in the
shopping center. PDMC Section 25.56.070 establishes standards for the maximum
allowed signage area for commercial signage. Since the subject building is more than 100
feet from public Right-of-Way, the PDMC requires ARC approval for sign area. The subject
building is situated 420 feet from Highway 111. There is an existing commercial building
situated in front of the subject building obstructing visibility from Highway 111. Therefore,
the sign program proposes that each major tenant sign is allowed one (1) square foot of
Page 73 of 115
SARC22-0004 – Palms to Pines West
Page 8 of 8
January 24, 2023
sign area for each lineal foot of tenant building resulting in a maximum square footage
allowed for each major tenant of 111 square feet. Additional sign area for the major tenants
is requested for M1 (Ross Dress for Less) to be 149.38 square feet and M2 (Grocery
Outlet) to be 121.01 square feet, exceeding the 111 square foot maximum sign allowance
for major tenants. Under this finding, deviations are allowed to an extent that the
comprehensive program will enhance the overall development and will more fully
accomplish the proposes and intent of this chapter. The proposed major tenant signs are
proportionally designed to ensure that the signage is visible from a major arterial as the
building is situated further south approximately 420 feet away from Highway 111.
6. Approval of a comprehensive sign program shall not authorize the use of signs prohibited
by this chapter.
All signs proposed by the sign program are allowed by the Palm Desert Municipal Code
(PDMC). The sign program includes a list of prohibited signage which is consistent with
all prohibited signs listed under PDMC Section 25.56.050.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the ARC determines the requirements of the Findings have been met based
on the analysis. Staff recommends the ARC approve the sign program with the following
modification:
1. Prior to the issuance of any sign permit the applicant shall resubmit a revised sign
program to planning staff which omits the maximum 111 square foot sign area and
revise to state the maximum sign area for M1 is 149.38 square feet and 121.01 square
feet of sign area for M2.
Staff further recommends that any modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as
conditions of approval.
Attachment: 1. Plans Submitted by Applicant.
Page 74 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
72655 - 72705 Highway 111
Page 75 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
OWNER/LANDLORD:
WOOD INVESTMENTS INC.
2950 Airway Ave., Suite A9
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(657) 247-2600
SIGN CONSULTANT:
SIGNS & SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
10980 Boatman Ave.,
Stanton, CA 90680
Contact: Matt DeRuyter
(714) 761-8200
matt@signsandservicesco.com
2
REVISION #:DESIGN #:
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM
DATE CREATED:
6/16/22 #5: 1/11/23 22405
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
INTRODUCTION.............................................................................
SUBMITTALS & APPROVALS.........................................................
FABRICATION & INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS...........................
CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN GUIDELINES........................................
SIGN AREA DIMENSIONS & CALCULATIONS..................................
PROHIBITED SIGNS........................................................................
SITE PLAN......................................................................................
MAJOR TENANT 1 - SIGN GUIDELINES..........................................
MAJOR TENANT 2 - SIGN GUIDELINES..........................................
PAD TENANT - SIGN GUIDELINES..................................................
SHOP TENANT - SIGN GUIDELINES................................................
ELEVATIONS...................................................................................
MONUMENT SIGN..........................................................................
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
17
Page 76 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO 3
This document establishes guidelines and criteria (“Criteria”) for the design, implementation and regulation of Tenant signage at Hwy 111 & Paseo (“Shopping Center”) in Palm Desert, California.
These sign criteria (“Criteria”) have been established to eliminate excessive and confusing sign displays and to preserve and enhance the appearance of the Shopping Center. The objectives are
to encourage high quality and unique signage, which is an integral part of the architecture of the Shopping Center, on a uniform, consistent and compatible basis as to quality and architectural
character. The intent of these Criteria is to insure that Tenant signage in the Shopping Center is designed and executed in a manner which will achieve these objectives while providing appropriate
identification of Tenants and Tenant's businesses, including incorporation of corporate identification where consistent with these Criteria. The design of all graphics will be carefully considered in
relation to the site architecture and landscaping, as well as to the specific context of the location within the project.
The design, fabrication, installation and maintenance of all signs, including but not limited to style and placement of lettering, size, color, materials and methods of illumination shall be subject to
the prior written approval of the Landlord as provided in this Criteria. Any installed non-conforming or unapproved sign, or non-maintained sign must be brought into conformance at the non-
conforming Tenant's expense.
INTRODUCTION
Page 77 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
SUBMITTAL & APPROVAL PROCESSES:
1. Submittal to Landlord
Prior to sign fabrication and applying for City approval of permits, each Tenant shall submit to the Landlord for approval full-size PDF format package
containing the following:
- Site plan of entire retail center. The site plan must clearly identify the proposed tenant space within the overall center.
- Scaled elevation of Tenant's storefront depicting the proposed sign design and all the dimensions as they relate to the Tenant's storefront.
- The Sign Elevation must specify exact dimensions, copy layout, materials, colors, method of attachment, illumination, electrical specifications and all other
details of construction as well as all sign area square footage.
- Approval of disapproval of sign submittals shall remain the sole right of the Landlord of his chosen representative. If submittals are disapproved, then Tenants
must submit revised plans until Landlord's approval is obtained.
2. City Submittal
A full set of plans must be approved and stamped by the Landlord prior to permit application. Tenant or their Sign Contractor must submit to the
City of Palm Desert, and will be responsible for all applicable applications and permit fees. Each Tenant shall be responsible for the fulfillment of all requirements
of the City of Palm Desert. Any sign that the Director determines should be reviewed by the ARC due to its unique design, context, color, size, shape, location or
circumstances of the sign, is subject to the requirements of Section 25.68.050 and Sign Design Review. Prohibited signs are listed on page 8. Unique signs could
include signs that have a distinct logo or registered trademark.
3. Approval and Installation
Tenant and its sign contractor shall not be permitted to commence installation of the exterior sign(s) unless all of the following conditions have been met:
- A stamped set of final drawings reflecting the Landlord's and the City's approval shall be obtained from each party.
- The Landlord must receive the sign installer's and/or sign company's Certificate if Insurance as set forth herein.
- The Landlord must receive and approve the sign installer's and/or sign company's schedule for installation of signage.
4. Modifications
In the event Tenant wished to change its exterior sign anytime during the term of its lease, the Tenant must comply with the requirements set forth herein
and any future modifications, revisions or changes which have been made to the Criteria for the Retail Center after the execution of its Lease Agreement.
4
Page 78 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO 5
FABRICATION & INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS:
The Tenant must ensure that their sign fabricator and installer understand their responsibilities before they begin the sign fabrication.
1. All electrical signs shall bear the UL label. Signs must be constructed and installed to meet or exceed all applicable codes and City requirements.
2. Signs shall be mounted & installed with no visible means of attachment, unless attachments are intentional design elements/statements. All illuminated signs must be
connected to tenant's electrical panel and must remain illuminated during general business operating hours, as
defined by the landlord, unless otherwise agreed upon by the landlord.
3. Colors, materials, and finishes shall abide by this sign program.
4. Finished metal surfaces shall be free from canning and warping. All sign finishes shall be free of dust, orange peel, or other blemishes.
5. Letter fastening and clips are to be concealed and be galvanized, stainless steel, aluminum, brass or bronze metals.
6. Power for the tenant building signage shall be provided by the tenant's electrical panel to a junction box at all sign locations. Power hookup shall be by tenant. A photo cell
and/or time clock (relay through house panel) shall be provided and controlled by landlord to uniformly turn signage on and off.
7. Installation shall be weather-tight with appropriate use of flashing, sealants and other building materials as may be required.
8. Use of adhesives for securing any type of signage is prohibited.
9. No other signage except that described herein is permitted. Unless a specific type of signage or advertising medium is specifically allowed under these Criteria, it is
considered disallowed until prior written approval of Landlord is obtained.
10. Tenant will be responsible for patching and re-painting of wall upon removal of any signage installed by tenant.
11. No person shall erect, re-erect, construct, enlarge, alter, change copy, repair, move, improve, remove, convert, or equip any sign or sign structure in the shopping center without
landlord and City approval.
12. All signs shall be designed as an integral part of the overall building design and shall be located in a manner consistent with the building’s design.
13. Signs that are not temporary signs shall be constructed of permanent materials, including, but not limited to, metal, wood, acrylic, or other comparable durable weatherproof materials.
Page 79 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO 6
CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN GUIDELINES:
Creative and Imaginative Signs are strongly encouraged and will be the standard for Landlords review/approval
of all sign design submittals. There are many acceptable sign treatments, however, a mixed media three-
dimensional approach combining several different fabrication and lighting techniques is preferred.
Tenants are strongly encouraged to consider the specific architectural style of their façade, the overall concept
of the project, the scale of the proposed sign and the critical viewing angles and sight lines when designing
appropriate graphics and signs for the storefront. Note that specific locations and surrounding architectural
treatments can limit the maximum sign height and length, which may differ from the general guidelines proposed
above. The Landlord reserves the right to approve or reject any proposed sign on the basis of its size and placement.
ACCEPTABLE SIGN STYLES INCLUDE:
1. Creative use of standard illuminated channel letters
2. Tasteful use of a channel logo preceding the Store Name channel letters (front or halo-lit)
3. Front and halo illuminated channel letters and channel logos centered or at the end of the Store Name are also allowed
4. Mixed media/dimensional signs using images, icons, logos, etc
5. Halo illuminated letters, 3” deep minimum
6. Dimensional geometric shapes integrated into the design
*Mixed Media signs are signs employing two or more illumination and fabrication methods
Front-lit Channel Logo & Channel Letters
“Halo” Back-Lit Channel Logo Shapes & Channel Letters
Dual-Illuminated Face & Halo Channel Letters & TaglineFace-Illuminated Channel Logo and Channel Letters
Page 80 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO 7
SIGN DIMENSIONS & AREA CALCULATIONS:
Note: Letter Ascenders & Descenders and Ascending and Descending shapes and elements may be allowed to extend up to 15% beyond the maximum square footage limit
provided the sign complies with all other sign requirements. The area of a sign shall be measured within a single continuous perimeter of not more than eight (8) straight limes
enclosing the extreme limits of text, logo, emblem or any figure of similar character, together with any material or color forming an integral part of the sign display or used to
differentiate the sign from the background, upon which it is placed. The sign design and manufacture must comply with Municipal Code: 25.56.060 E.
Examples of how sign area is measured are shown below:
h
x
1 7
2
3 5
6
4
8
h
x
h
x
EXHIBIT A
Areas of Signs with 2 Lines of Text shall be measured by outlining
all of the Sign with eight (8) straight lines and calculating the area
within the outlined area
EXHIBIT CEXHIBIT B
Signs with Backgrounds integral with their identity
shall be included in the total Sign Area
Areas of Signs with 2 Lines of Text shall be measured by outlining
all of the Sign with eight (8) straight lines and calculating the area
within the outlined area
h
x
h
x
EXHIBIT EEXHIBIT D
This Exhibit illustrates an example where the ascenders and the
descenders exceed the 50% of the Letterform’s “h” height and
are, therefore included in the overall Sign Area’s calculations
Letterform ascenders and descenders will not be considered in the
overall height and area limitations only if they constitute less than
50% of the Letterform’s “h” height
Page 81 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
PROHIBITED SIGNS:
The following are prohibited:
A. Advertising devices.
B. Awnings that are back-lit (internally illuminated) so that the awning radiates light.
C. Large cabinet or can signs that are internally illuminated with translucent panels that allow the entire sign background to be illuminated. Signs with internal illumination are permitted only
if the sign background is opaque and the only portion of the sign that appears illuminated is the lettering and/or a registered trademark or logo.
D. Electronic changeable copy signs.
E. Commercial mascots.
F. Neon signs, except those placed in windows.
G. Off-site outdoor advertising signs (billboards).
H. Pole signs.
I. Roof signs.
J. Signs that rotate, move, flash, blink, or appear to do any of the foregoing with the exception of approved time and temperature displays.
K. Signs on public property, in the public right-of-way, or on public utility poles unless otherwise authorized by this chapter. Signs shall include, but not be limited to, realtor, open
house, and garage sale signs. This prohibition shall include all portable signs including those placed on vehicles with the exception of vehicle identification signs, and permitted
signs on taxicabs.
L. Temporary or portable freestanding signs, A-frame signs (refer to 25.56.090 Temporary Signs) except as otherwise provided in this chapter.
M. Vehicle signs.
N. Wind activated or balloon or inflatable signs.
O. Painted Signs.
8
Page 82 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
SITE PLAN
WALL SIGNS:
MAJOR TENANT
SHOP TENANT
9
LEGEND:
MONUMENT SIGN
GROUND SIGNS:
MAJOR 2 MAJOR 1
MM1
SHOP
SHOP
M2
M2
NOT INCLUDED
Page 83 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO 10
MAJOR 1 - SIGN GUIDELINES:
Allowed one (1) sign on (front) elevation. Up to two (2) secondary signs are allowed. The total aggregate sign area of the primary sign together with the secondary sign shall not
exceed the maximum sign area allowed for the business
Tenant is allowed 1 square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of tenant building frontage.
Overall width for each sign shall not exceed 75% of the tenant’s building frontage or fascia which the sign is to be located and in most cases, shall be centered horizontally and
vertically on fascia. A minimum 12” margin must be maintained between signage and fascia edge or architectural feature (i.e. columns, cormices, change in color or finish), unless
approved by landlord.
Maximum Primary Sign Square Footage Allowed for Each Major Tenant = 111.0 SQ. FT.
TOTAL COMBINED SQUARE FOOTAGE: 270.39 SQ. FT.
FRONT ELEVATION VIEW / MAJOR ANCHOR TENANTS PRIMARY WALL SIGNS
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'- 0"1
111’- 4”
222’- 8” Both Major Anchor Stores’ Combined Length
111’- 4”
36’- 0”46’- 9”
34’- 4” (Uses 73.20% of Fascia)EQ EQ EQ EQ
EQ EQEQ EQ
NO Other Tenant’s Wall Signs may be Installed higher on their Building Facade
than the ROSS Primary Wall Sign. All Wall Signs must be below 24’- 6” Overall Height
101.56 SQ. FT.149.38 SQ. FT.
149.38 SQ. FT. TOTAL SIGN-SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR ROSS 121.01 SQ. FT. TOTAL COMBINED SQ. FTG. FOR GROCERY OUTLET
7.45 SQ. FT.12.0 SQ. FT.
46’- 9”
23’- 6 1/4” (Uses 50.5% of Fascia)4’- 11 5/8”8’- 0”
18”18”
12”12”
36’- 0”28’- 5 3/4”28’- 5 3/4”
2’- 5”2’- 5”
3’- 7 3/4”
2’- 9”
2’- 2 3/4”
16’- 10 1/ ”218’- 5 3/4”9’- 4 1/4”
14’- 4 3/4”
MAJOR TENANT 1 / PRIMARY WALL SIGN MAJOR TENANT 2 / PRIMARY WALL SIGN MAJOR 2 / SECONDARY WALL SIGNS
25 1/4”
CL
CL
CL
CL
25 1/4”
9 3/4”
Page 84 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
NORTH ELEVATION / PORTION 1 / MAJOR TENANTS’ PRIMARY WALL SIGNS / NIGHTTIME RENDERING
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'- 0"
MAJOR 1 & 2 - NIGHTTIME RENDERING
11
Page 85 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
MAJOR TENANT 2 - PRIMARY WALL SIGN GUIDELINES:
MAJOR TENANT 2 - PRIMARY WALL SIGN
12
SQUARE FOOTAGE DETERMINED USING EIGHT (8) STRAIGHT LINES AROUND SIGN ELEMENTS
(DESCENDERS ARE NOT COUNTED AS PART OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWED)
101.56 SQ. FT.
64.76 SQ. FT.
36.80 SQ. FT.
23’- 6 1/4”
4 1/2”
2’- 9”
2’- 2 3/4”
16’- 10 1/2”
TOTAL COMBINED SQUARE FOOTAGE: 101.56 SQ. FT.
FRONT ELEVATION VIEW / MAJOR ANCHOR GROCERY TENANT PRIMARY WALL SIGN (SHARING FACADE w/ ROSS DRESS FOR LESS SIGN)
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0"1 END VIEW / MAJOR GROCERY
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'- 0"2
END VIEW / ATTACHMENT DETAIL / MAJOR GROCERY TENANT
SCALE: NTS3
5”
3/16'' THICK PLEXIGLAS
LETTER-FACES AS REQUIRED
TRIMCAP HELD BY WASHER HEAD SCREWS
BLACK TRIMCAP COLORATION
WALL SURFACE & STUDS
WEEP HOLES @ BOTTOM w/ LIGHT SHIELD
LED LIGHT MODULES
PRE-PAINTED .040 THICK ALUMINUM
BLACK CHANNEL LETTER RETURNS
5” DEEP
1” TRIMCAP
WALL ATTACHMENTS: 10-24 THREAD
FOUR (4) LAG SCREWS WITH NYLON ANCHORS
(MINIMUM FOUR (4) PER LETTER)
JUNCTION-BOX WITH
PRIMARY ELECTRICAL 120-277V / AC
POWER (BY OTHERS)
FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION
PERFORMED BY LICENSED ELECTRICIAN
PRIMARY
ELECTRICAL
PROVIDED
BY OTHER
REMOTE POWER SUPPLY
SLOAN COMPACT 60 WATT
IN METAL RECEPTACLE w/
POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH
NIGHT RENDERING
Page 86 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO 13
4’- 11 5/8”8’- 0”
1’- 6”1’- 6”
TOTAL COMBINED SQUARE FOOTAGE: 19.45 SQ. FT.
FRONT ELEVATION VIEW / MAJOR ANCHOR TENANTS SECONDARY WALL SIGNS
SCALE: 3/8" = 1'- 0"1
MAJOR TENANT 2 - SECONDARY WALL SIGN GUIDELINES:
MAJOR TENANT 2 - SECONDARY WALL SIGNS
END VIEW / ATTACHMENT DETAIL / MAJOR GROCERY TENANT
SCALE: NTS2
3/16'' THICK PLEXIGLAS
LETTER-FACES AS REQUIRED
TRIMCAP HELD BY WASHER HEAD SCREWS
BLACK TRIMCAP COLORATION
WALL SURFACE & STUDS
WEEP HOLES @ BOTTOM w/ LIGHT SHIELD
LED LIGHT MODULES
PRE-PAINTED .040 THICK ALUMINUM
BLACK CHANNEL LETTER RETURNS
5” DEEP
1” TRIMCAP
WALL ATTACHMENTS: 10-24 THREAD
FOUR (4) LAG SCREWS WITH NYLON ANCHORS
(MINIMUM FOUR (4) PER LETTER)
JUNCTION-BOX WITH
PRIMARY ELECTRICAL 120-277V / AC
POWER (BY OTHERS)
FINAL ELECTRICAL CONNECTION
PERFORMED BY LICENSED ELECTRICIAN
PRIMARY
ELECTRICAL
PROVIDED
BY OTHER
REMOTE POWER SUPPLY
SLOAN COMPACT 60 WATT
IN METAL RECEPTACLE w/
POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH
7.45 SQ. FT.12.0 SQ. FT.
Page 87 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
SHOP TENANTS - SIGN GUIDELINES:
Allowed one (1) sign on (front) elevation one, and (1) additional sign on (side) elevation, if the unit is an end or corner unit. No secondary signs are allowed on shop tenant buildings.
Tenant is allowed 1 square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of tenant building frontage, as long as the sign meets the height and line width text requirements.
Overall width for each sign shall not exceed 75% of the tenant’s building frontage or fascia upon which the sign is to be located and in most cases, shall be centered horizontally and
vertically on fascia. A minimum 12” margin must be maintained between signage and fascia edge or architectural feature (i.e. columns, cornices, change in color or finish), unless
approved by landlord. Signs must be located below the roof’s eave line with a minimum of 3” of margin around any sign element. Crowded looking signs will need to be reduced to
observe margins and may not be any higher than 20’- 0” measured from the top of the sidewalk adjacent to the sign.
All primary signs must be interior-illuminated and shall include a dimmer switch to help control lighting excess.
Color: Signs shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) colors per sign. If a federally-regulated trademark sign has more than three (3) colors, must be approved by Landlord and also
must meet all City Sign Code Requirements.
14
22’- 0”22’- 0” 20’- 0” 20’- 0”
279’- 0”
20’- 0” 20’- 0”30’- 0”30’- 0”47’- 0”48’- 0”
15’- 0” Max16’- 4” Max16’- 4” Max16’- 4” Max 16’- 4” Max15’- 0” Max 15’- 0” Max 15’- 0” Max
Page 88 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO 15
ELEVATIONS
NORTH ELEVATION / PORTION 1 / MAJOR TENANTS’ PRIMARY WALL SIGNS
NORTH ELEVATION / PORTIONS 1 & 2 COMPLETE / MAJOR TENANTS’ & IN-LINE SHOP-TENANTS’ PRIMARY WALL SIGNS
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'- 0"
MAJOR TENANT 1 / PRIMARY WALL SIGN MAJOR TENANT 2 / PRIMARY WALL SIGN
SCALE: NTS
BUILDING PORTION 1 BUILDING PORTION 2
NORTH ELEVATION / PORTION 2 / IN-LINE SHOP-TENANTS’ PRIMARY WALL SIGNS
SCALE: NTS
Page 89 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
ELEVATIONS
16
Page 90 of 115
MASTER SIGN PROGRAM s i g n s a n d s e r v i c e s c o . c o m
HWY 111 & EL PASEO
SIGN SPECIFICATIONS:
COLORS & FINISHES:
COLORS & FINISHES:
Tenant Sign Panels to be Routed & Painted .125” Aluminum
Letters & Graphics will be 1/2” Thick Acrylic Push-Thru w/
Applied Vinyl Facing (Dictated by Logo Art, using contrast)
Internal Illumination using 6500K White LED Modules and have
Dimmer Switch.
The Aluminum Sign Faces do not Illuminate, just Lettering & Logo.
Each Tenant Allowed two (2) lines of copy.
Each Space on Monument should hold One (1) Business
GROCERY OUTLET:
ROSS DRESS FOR LESS:
PAINT ALUMINUM FACES T/M MATTHEWS 3630-73 DARK RED (SAT FIN)
PAINT ALUMINUM FACES T/M ROSS CORPORATE BLUE (SAT FIN)
GROCERY OUTLET LETTERS: ARLON #20 WHITE VINYL FILM
GROCERY OUTLET LETTERS: ARLON #20 WHITE VINYL FILM
BARGAIN MARKET LETTERS: ARLON #125 GOLDEN YELLOW VINYL FILM
MONUMENT SIGNM
17
M1 QTY: 1
M2 QTY: 2
Daytime Rendering Nighttime RenderingPush-Thru LetteringPush-Thru Lettering
Daytime Rendering Nighttime RenderingPush-Thru LetteringPush-Thru Lettering
P1
P2
V1
V1
V2
7’-6”
Page 91 of 115
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Commission
From: Nikki Gomez, Assistant Planner
Date: January 24, 2023
Subject: SARC22-0005 – 73585 Fred Waring Drive – Request for approval of a
comprehensive sign program for exterior signage for the Oracle Plaza.
PROJECT SUMMARY:
The proposed project is a request to establish a new comprehensive sign program for an
existing multi-tenant office complex, generally known as Oracle Plaza, located at 73585 Fred
Waring Drive. The proposed sign program will establish design guidelines for a total of nine
(9) exterior tenant wall signs, window signs, and one (1) existing monument sign.
The tenant building signs will consist of a total of (9) exterior identification signs including one
(1) existing building identification sign, one (1) existing tenant sign, and seven (7) new tenant
signs. There are a total of eight tenants in the building.
Table 1 below identifies the location of the existing and proposed exterior building signs. All
wall signs will be installed on the existing facia of the building as depicted on the exterior
elevations provided on pages 9 through 12 of the Sign Program. The north building elevation
facing Fred Waring Drive shows the existing tenant sign “Oracle Plaza” with no new proposed
exterior signage. The south elevation shows five (5) new exterior tenants signs; three (3) are
proposed on the first floor and two (2) on the second floor. The west elevation shows one (1)
existing tenant exterior building sign “Palm Desert Dental Center” with no new proposed
signage. The east elevation shows two (2) new proposed exterior signs at the upper corner
of the building which will be visible from westbound Fred Waring Drive.
Table 1: Sign Location
Elevation Number of
Signs
Type of Sign Existing/New
North 1 Main Building Sign Existing “Oracle Plaza”
South 5 Tenant Sign New
East 2 Tenant Sign New
West 1 Tenant Sign Existing “Palm Desert Dental
Center”
Page 92 of 115
SARC22-0005 – Oracle Plaza Sign Program
Page 2 of 5
January 24, 2023
Table 2 below summarizes the proposed sign program and compliance with the Palm Desert
Municipal Code (PDMC). The sign program proposes to allow each tenant a maximum sign
area of one (1) square foot per lineal foot of suite frontage, up to a maximum of 25 square
feet. A condition has been included, specifying that there will be no illumination on exterior
tenant signs adjacent to residential area.
Table 2: Business Identification Sign - Exterior Tenant Sign
Standard PDMC Permanent Sign
Requirement
Proposed Sign Program Conforms
Allowed Sign
Types
Flush Mounted Wall Sign Flush Mounted Wall Sign Yes
Maximum
Number
1 per tenant frontage 1 sign per tenant Yes
Maximum Sign
Area
1 square feet sign area
per lineal foot of building
frontage, maximum area
of 50 square feet
1 square feet sign area per
lineal foot of tenant frontage
up to a maximum of 25
square-feet
Yes
The proposed sign program identifies that all exterior signage to be either non-illuminated or
back-lit illuminated channels. The sign program proposes all illuminated signs will be
designed with a dimmer system. The allowable sign parameters are proposed to be one foot
per linear foot of suite frontage with a maximum size of 25 square feet. Each suite is allowed
to have a window sign which can occupy 25% of the window area. The window signs will be
inside the window surface with the option to be illuminated. A condition has been added to
ensure that no window signs are allowed above ground floor windows.
Table 3: Business Identification Sign - Window Sign
Standard PDMC Permanent Sign
Requirement
Proposed Sign Program Conforms
Allowed Sign
Types
Permanent Window Sign Permanent Window Sign Yes
Maximum
Number
One sign per individual
window Allowed in
addition to other signs
1 per tenant frontage Yes
Maximum Sign
Area
25% of total window area
facing a public street or
public parking area
including temporary
window signs
25% of total window area
facing a public street or
public parking area
Yes
Maximum Sign
Height
Not allowed above
ground floor windows
Condition for windows signs
to not be allowed above
ground floor windows
Yes
Page 93 of 115
SARC22-0005 – Oracle Plaza Sign Program
Page 3 of 5
January 24, 2023
Location On inside of window
surface
On inside of window surface Yes
Lighting Allowed Yes, however,
conditioned added for
illumination for its
proximity to residential
area
Not facing residential. Yes
The project site has one existing monument sign which will remain externally illuminated with
an allowable single line text painted on acrylic beige vinyl. There will be no changes to the
height or width of the monument sign.
BACKGROUND
A. Property Description:
The project site is a 0.70-acre parcel located at 73585 Fred Waring Drive (APN 627-101-
059), on the south side of Fred Waring Drive and approximately 400 feet east of San Pablo
Avenue. The site is developed with a 12,000 square-foot, two-story multi-tenant office. The
existing office building was approved by City Council in June 2004 under Resolution No. 04-
81 (Case No. Precise Plan 03-22) and constructed in 2007.
B. Current Zoning & General Plan Land Use Designations:
Table 4 – Adjacent Land Use and Designations
Existing Uses General Plan Zoning
Project Site Office Building Neighborhood Center
(NC)
Office Professional (OP)
North Palm Desert
Civic Center
Public
Facility/Institutional
Public Institution (P)
South Multifamily
Residential
Small Town
Neighborhood (STN) 3 to
10 dwellings per acre
Multi-family residential
(R-3)
East Multifamily
Residential
Neighborhood Center
(NC)
Multi-family residential
(R-3)
West Single-Family
Residential
Downtown Downtown Edge (DE)
Zoning Ordinance Summary
Comprehensive sign programs are required when any one of the circumstances listed under
Palm Desert Municipal Code Section (PDMC) 25.56.100 (B) occur. Per this section, a sign
program is required for the project site as it is proposing signage on an existing multi-tenant
office building where more than three (3) separate tenant spaces are present and proposes
signage on the second story on a multi-story building:
Page 94 of 115
SARC22-0005 – Oracle Plaza Sign Program
Page 4 of 5
January 24, 2023
ARC approval is required for all comprehensive sign programs per Palm Desert Municipal
Code (PDMC) Section 25.56.100 (E). Findings in support of the project are listed below:
A comprehensive sign program shall comply with the following standards:
1. The proposed sign program shall comply with the purpose and intent of this chapter.
The purpose and intent of Chapter 25.56 (Sign Ordinance) is to provide for visually
attractive signage, which affords each user adequate identification while guarding
against excessive advertising. It also ensures that signs are in harmony with the
building and neighboring signs. The proposed sign program is necessary for the
tenant’s business and as proposed, ensures each sign is proportional to the scale of
building. The signs are in harmony as each sign proposes to use a consistent
construction style consisting of either non-illuminated or illuminated backlit channel
letters and establishes a consistent size requirement for all signs. Under PDMC
25.56.030 (E) (8) the location and design of a proposed sign in close proximity to a
residential district must not adversely affect the value or character of the adjacent
residential use. The adjacent parcels to the south, east and west are developed with
residential uses. Therefore, a condition has been established to ensure that signage
on these elevations does not adversely affect adjacent residential uses the sign
program will restrict signage to non-illuminated signage only.
2. The proposed signs shall enhance the overall development, be in harmony with, and
relate visually to other signs included in the comprehensive sign program, to the
structures and/or developments they identify, and to surrounding development when
applicable.
The proposed signage enhances the overall development by providing for the orderly
sign placement and design on signs on the first and second floor of the existing
building. The proposed sign program establishes the signs are in harmony with the
existing architecture. Most of the new exterior signs are proposed at the south
elevation where the entrances to the tenant suites are located. The main existing
commercial center name shall remain at the north side along Fred Waring. The
proposed signs to the east and south elevation are imposed with sign area, design,
and illumination guidelines so it is consistent with the existing signs with each other.
3. The sign program shall address all signs, including permanent, temporary, and exempt
signs.
The sign program addresses the locations of all permanent and exempt signs.
4. The sign program shall accommodate future revisions that may be required because
of changes in use or tenants.
The sign program accommodates tenant changes and revisions by specifying sign
locations, and maximum areas allowed for each tenant by providing a maximum area
limitation of one square-foot at a maximum of 25 square feet.
Page 95 of 115
SARC22-0005 – Oracle Plaza Sign Program
Page 5 of 5
January 24, 2023
5. The sign program shall comply with the standards of this chapter, except that
deviations are allowed with regard to sign area, total number, location, and/or height
of signs to the extent that the comprehensive sign program will enhance the overall
development and will more fully accomplish the purposes and intent of this chapter.
PDMC Section 25.56.070 establishes standards for the maximum allowed number of
signs and the maximum allowed signage area for commercial signage. The proposed
sign program establishes the requirements for the exterior tenant sign as is
summarizes under Table 2, window sign under Table 3 and monument sign. The
street frontage is permitted to have a maximum signage area of one (1) square foot of
sign area per lineal foot of building frontage, maximum sign area of 50 square feet. As
proposed, the sign program on the south elevation would allow at a maximum of 125
square feet in total for five (5) exterior signs, three (3) on the first floor and two (2) on
the second floor. The east elevation would allow 2 exterior signs at a maximum of 50
square feet while the north and west elevation has an existing signage. Since the
commercial building is two stories with multiple tenant suites, the proposed signs will
accommodate a single primary sign of each tenant.
6. Approval of a comprehensive sign program shall not authorize the use of signs
prohibited by this chapter.
All signs proposed by the sign program are allowed by the Palm Desert Municipal
Code (PDMC). The sign program includes a list of prohibited signage which is
consistent with all prohibited signs listed under PDMC Section 25.56.050.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the ARC approve the sign program with the following modifications
incorporated into the motion as conditions of approval:
1) Prior to the issuance of any sign permit, the applicant shall submit a revised Sign
Program to Planning Staff which includes a restriction that all exterior signs including,
window signs shall be non-illuminated on all elevations facing existing residential uses.
2) Prior to the issuance of any sign permit, the applicant shall submit a revised Sign
Program to Planning Staff that includes a revised floor plan in the document which
clearly associates each suite number with a specific exterior sign location,
3) The sign program shall be revised to identify all prohibited signs and comply with Palm
Desert Municipal Code Chapter 25.56.050.
4) Window signs shall be prohibited on all second story windows.
Any exceptions or modifications required by the ARC be added to the motion as conditions
of approval.
Attachment: 1. Plans Submitted by Applicant.
Page 96 of 115
Page 97 of 115
Page 98 of 115
Page 99 of 115
Page 100 of 115
Page 101 of 115
Page 102 of 115
Page 103 of 115
Page 104 of 115
Page 105 of 115
Page 106 of 115
Page 107 of 115
Page 108 of 115
Page 109 of 115
Page 110 of 115
Page 111 of 115
Page 112 of 115
Page 113 of 115
Sign Program
ORCALE PLAZA BUILDING
Final Inspection of Sign Installation:
1.The installing sign contractor shall call the City for a final inspection after having installed the sign.
2.The Final Inspection Card must be maintained on file with the Sign Contractor.
3.Signs that deviate from this Sign Program will be removed at the tenant's expense.
*Provisional Clause:
This Sign Program is intended to address nearly all sign types while adhering to City sign codes and facilitating business operations. It is understood that
a tenant could have sign needs that may not "fit" the Sign Program. With this understanding and in all fairness to applicants, lan dlord and the
City of Palm Desert Community Development Department will reserve the right to review proposals on a "case by case" basis. Applicants that fall
into this category are strongly encouraged to meet with the landlord and the Community Development Department prior to sign design to review and
exhaust all options prior to using said provision due to legal sensitivity and extended lead times of provision:
Any changes that deviate substantially from the original approval shall require the approval of a new/revised comprehensive
sign program by the ARC.
Uncertainty of chapter provisions. The ARC shall have the authority to interpret the provisions of this chapter at the request of the Director,
or when an appeal of a decision the Director is filed with the ARC.
Sign Maintenance
1.Maintenance of signs is the responsibility of the owner/tenant to maintain all elements of its sign.
2.Former tcnant(s) shall be responsible for the removal of the signage, including: scaling patching, painting, and electrical disconnect (s).
Removals to be completed within a 10 (ten) day period of lease termination at the tenant's expense. It is required that you use a sign contractor
for signage and signage component removal and electrical disconnect, and a painting contractor for finishing and painting wor k All repair work
must match the building color and texture. Working area must be left in a neat and clean condition and the surface that held the sign be left in a
ncw-llkc or original appearance (a patch like appearance is unacceptable) at the departing tenant's sole expense.
Sign Contractors Responsibilty
1.All costs of signs, installation and permits shall be at the sole expense of the tenant and their California C45 licensed Sign Contractor are
responsible for fulfillment of all requirements of this sign program.
41945 BOARDWALK, SUITE L PALM DESERT, CA 92211 PH 760.776.9907 / FX 760.776.9844
DATE: 12/06/2022
PG 1 Page 114 of 115
CITY OF PALM DESERTATTENDANCE REPORTAdvisory Body: Architectural Review CommissionPrepared By:Year 2023 2022MonthDate 10‐Jan 25‐Jan 8‐Feb 22‐Feb 8‐Mar 22‐Mar 12‐Apr 26‐Apr 10‐May 24‐May 14‐Jun 28‐Jun 12‐Jul 26‐Jul 9‐Aug 23‐Aug 13‐Sep 27‐Sep 11‐Oct 25‐Oct 8‐Nov 22‐Nov 13‐Dec 27‐DecColvard, Dean WallacePPPPPPP A P‐11Latkovic, NicholasPPPP‐PPPP PPP‐‐‐PPPPPP P P‐00McAuliffe, MichaelPPPP‐PPPA PPP‐‐‐PAPPPP P P‐22McIntosh, JamesPPPP‐PPAP PPA‐‐‐PPAPPAAP‐55Sanchez, FranciscoPPPPPP P P‐00Vuksic, JohnPPPP‐PPPP PPP‐‐‐PPPPPP P A‐11Vacancy00Palm Desert Municipal Code 2.34.010:2022 2022 20222022Total AbsencesOctNovDec202220222022M. Gonzalez2022 2022Twice Monthly: Six unexcused absences from regular meetings in any twelve‐month period shall constitute an automatic resignation of members holding office on boards that meet twice monthly.Total Unexcused AbsencesJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep2022 2022Page 115 of 115