Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE/MONTEREY AVE/COOK STREET C/Z 01-78 1978
E 9 r T Al t-17 7 q 11: 4. A-.-- 4 -A Ji 77 F 7 - - - - - - - - - - _4 —7771: a . 1 1. . . I 1: 1 f .7 I t L L - - - - - - - - - -- ----- 7.- 7 1 r - 7 r - - 7:1 j_ :L - - - I L : t r J L 1 1f .7-1 r- 77-:7-7 7 7-7- t X, . w ritr (r, M'I(:;" NORTH SCALE I"=400' LEGEND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING R/W ------------------- PROP LOT LINE - - - - - - - PROP. STREET ZONE R-1 u COUNTRY I 1 _ I 1 I ��w I- I L---------I I ----- I I L L 1 I 1 I I L ----- ----- ----J IL -- I I ----- - -- ------------ ---1 ----J li II it II II II II , II lil II II I / \ � I I� I� II III I I� I I III I �1_ I 1—I— TTT TT LLL LT rrrta I-{ �, L� _LLL L1� FF TTT TrT-FT—rr r - 77 T- —n LLL LLL *rf TT . rTT TTr r-rn rTT 7 7-1 T T -- _ �La 1 111 11- L Lu LJJJ 111 1J� TH--k-I-E- � � I 1-L J� Ju 111� �LIJ JJ_I_ LLL LLu uJ� 111_ I� T7.7 ITT .7-7T71 JJJ 1J -j- �Tr + �T- TTT- �f n L L 1 --L J_- 111 11 III . i 14 i L TI I _ 11-4 -I--i 111 1 i 1 a ILL LL rn� I-f 1! L► r �� 1-71 4 -I __LLL ] TT- �---�- �-- LL r�T uJ_ 17Q S „a pleo Vp oVLQ.- i WA % N 'FRA4- aI- metic-, AVE-. E 60.s E Ai- viLI cow, �lv © i:frrts . -kip M, t4o kceEs wrr� -phL c(csc&+- 45*6F- Aw,o cg2o u)—pt OvFk, . SANS avNFs I'9�¢.E' leis a��g2itvf _A lalqvllw� ftgW,� almtie- G �gL3s KY10 CW 1• mvn 61 S S R MD l0rmw RA(q C�1 1r►'N NF 1 t L i � , y4.4., ?o& L* �o (YoK wMbs V ?ALm Tese - GAS ANo c6a Avr , m �1 o �c12�r o� R,� kt- ;o UoAe4 w m s S Rry o :N- None 30th7 A �A�1J oi- V1 I / _ COLn1� Ci v4 Pis A �f shows .....SAND Dv,, t. AA 1' .1 ;x h1' t • p ,v:-1, s -spy, v' S�'' a'ja �Y Qv - •I w i y � �, M 4 � '!. Er • �_ �3R. � � �� r: 1'` � + � - ••.Pii, # k ',4' 4 t s - ice-' - � .��` rf t, _ � _ � �� � s ti .... _�, .� �.. � �.-. V. .... ^ ~ i� ✓. ✓ ...�� �. �� �-�; -., ��_ �1i mot., `.�� 1.. .•• • 1 ,x.1 4 y 1R; A xy f -� �I �` � � ��Fr Y+��il ,i •,pi.�w1.� r) �r L • '���,M1. t�" � r r.' 10 fq .17 r •P n. � C ,M1:: "a z, - YS3`.II 1 t � I f� 0 ORDINANCE NO. 187 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 107, THE PALM DESERT ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2)(U.A.), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.), R-1 12,000(U.A.), PR-5(U.A.),P(U.A.), PR-4(U.A.) & O.S.(U.A.), ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITE - WATER STORM CHANNEL BETWEEN MONTEREY AVENUE & COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 The City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN, as follows: SECTION 1: That a portion of Ordinance 107 referencing Section 25.46-1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Map (Chapter 25.46 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code) is hereby amended to read as shown on the attached exhibit, labeled Exhibit 'A' SECTION 2: The City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, Cali- fornia, is herby directed to publish this Ordinance in the Palm Desert Post, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Palm Desert, California, and shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and the same shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the Palm Desert City Council this 27th day of July 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: McPherson, Newbrander, Wilson & Mullins NOES: None ABSENT: Brush ABSTAIN: None ' COMMON SECTION CONNEN f COUNTY U CONORIVERSIDE .4 ran. rnme�.e .'n u9'1 N¢..' '� I xu•u'AAII PNOPOSID PMnI 6E5ENT C17Y LIMIT 1117..0 'Sto R-1 12,000 I I i • r E S'B B I 1 104 99R�!• 1. I I_._ 4. i! ` I9T l.AG• PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT 67 ACRE 5 to P.R.-5 5 To (U.A.) P. R.- 5 COMM FIORC'1 SECTION 17 a T.5-SOH-6.E S B.B.M. C. ti_N' E L 1s w.wu, SECT��N N CONE Ii J! t _ ir a v: c l lorl 9 l'l` I b N-6.E 5,B B M S 7-o P. R.-4 (u.a.) � PROPOSED EMIM DESERT CITY LIMIT 1 A: i .�-- PALM Of SENT CITY LIMIT LOCATION MAP COUNTY Of HIVE R SI OE PALM DESERT CITY LIMY PROPOSED ZONING FOR ANNEXATION NO. 5 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT (EXHiBIT A CASE NO. C/Z 01-78) on H d � zo mz or 0 oil ::B�MI1naa 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE June 20, 1978 APPLICANT Palm Desert Planning Commission P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE No.: C/Z 01-78 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 14, 1978 CONTINUED DENIED XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 PLACED ON THt AGE14DA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. XX PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF July 13, 1978 FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION L � v awl- )X:a l ma 6�)a-ti�•.a•l 46-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 aEruRn to Fo SENDER oO >t I>elh-ei°pk as P, , \AB(E TO FORdJressed WARD Joan Potter 5259 Me ose AVe. Los Ange s, CA 90038 6 �{ w � U s uwi y� J za zo W � June 19, 1978 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATLEY 1,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.A.), O.S. (U.A.), OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL BETWEEN MONTEREY AVENUE AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre - Zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2) (U.A.) (Planned Com- mercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.) (Single-family Residen- tial, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexation), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4 (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S. (U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and Whitewater Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common ; Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being +60 rnmmnn rn wnen n-0 Cnr+innr 0 -A n . 4A .......+ -,-- L-:-- THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89' 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89' 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89' 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. t SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, July 13, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are June 19, 1978 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATLEY 1,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.A.), O.S. (U.A.), OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL BETWEEN MONTEREY AVENUE AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre - Zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2) (U.A.) (Planned Com- mercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.) (Single-family Residen- tial, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexation), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4 (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S. (U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and Whitewater Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common ', Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being i THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 890 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, d distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89' 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89' 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. ,.,PC (21 S to ;R-2 8,000 (8)(UA) Gr. i ,tf OYx S to P.R-S 1 (VA MJV rMYrr,rl .1.., R-1 12,000 W.A.) w >un un Clrr <9 w. a,nr nn Cr" S S to P.R.-4 MA.) ttcno. n w,P .t..r ua ..ppPC wu It51x1 (Il♦ I � at m 1 1{; 0.FS CA L to OS. (U.a •6ol 5 to P. R to ¢r..r . 0- ,.,, ....t .... PR.-4 (U.A1 e,prp,[Y MGM pt4.l <I1. llYll —�— � w. on[.r "l. „rr ft.., C", urr 1 � 1 1 , SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, July 13, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invifcrl fn nffcnd and ha ht,Arl RESOLUTION NO. 78-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION KNOWN AS, "PALM DESERT ANNEXATION NO. 5," PURSUANT TO SECTION 35140 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT CODE. WHEREAS, over twenty-five percent of the property owners have requested, by petition, within the area hereafter known as, "Palm Desert Annexation No. 5," and more particularly described in the attached map and legal description; and, WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act has been com- plied with, pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 78-32, in that all responsible agencies have been contacted and an expanded initial study has been completed by the City Staff; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed change of organization is appropriate for the following reasons: 1. The request is a logical expansion of the City boundaries. 2. Expanding the boundaries of the proposed annexation to in- clude all property south of Country Club Drive is considered consistent with the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 which encourages limiting the number of annexations processed and expanding City boundaries to include logical growth area. 3. The proposed annexation is considered of sufficient size to mitigate the two major environmental concerns related to the area: which are provisions for blowsand protection and pre- servation of unique land forms and animal habitat in the area. 4. The proposed area to be annexed has been determined to be of satisfactory size to provide municipal services without ad- versely affecting the rest of the Community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. The above recitations are hereby determined to be true and correct and represent the findings of the Countil in this matter. 2. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to file an official appli- cation with the Local Agency Formation Commission for Palm Desert Annexa- tion No. 5 pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 for unin- habited territory since less than twelve registered voters reside in the area. 3. In addition to any required application, the clerk is hereby instructed to forward the attached Plan for Services to LAFCO as required by Section 35140 of the State Government Code. PARSEn APPRnVF.n_ and AT)OPT17.1) n.t n. reunla_r meatina of the Palm �- Rc.c�-v EsTs gpR ANC ! .- CUAKew tii.CT1ON / COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ° COMMON SECTION CORNER •" COMMON 6 5 0 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CORNER COUMTIY ttae Derv[ 4 3 I ° eea ]f E"} �. to sa' - of •]YOP'Y iNb H• B 1 .....2'00�E PROPOSED PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT aaoLbo' I E�-- ID 1q I 9 —1 CMC w1 L ME • PROPOSEU PALM DES AT I l CITY LIMIT I �� SECTION BM ��-- y 'r I� �� K .+ c. T-S-S, IR-6-E S.B.B. ! .. SECTION 9 a b a ° ! I T-5-3,R-6-E S.B.B M. - I ` %.4 iO4J.67 ACRES I � ]anbai L--I PROPOSED PALM CITY r ' �SECTION CORNEN m i I' 0 tl_IF4 Ie 0 0 PARCEL MAP 93/R � $ o Ute.00 n 1 7] 1100! 36 PAGES; 83-85 PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT - '„ o v a i a �l ir r, ea'!a'0a'E absx.aE' I � I �- PALM DESERT : I _a CITY LIMIT V w PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT COMMON SECT CORNER e e 6 --- w ,i IC e - SECTION 17 p COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE T-5-S,R-6-E PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT WRITE III, 4TER b. 1F•0t']a .w n :: i v _RIVER LAF PAL N DESERT CITY LIMIT FLOOD al4j•a!' C'V,C $ I, CONiR0 OGN4 - - PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. �Y EDATE7-14-78 TOTHE CITY OF PALM DESER IN SECTION 8 99 17 T-3-S R.6-E S ENGINEER_ ENOINEEAINO DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALE �7 • mw VIK *Wi �•*{fib � .. 1 . �Oot1IN G NV A- 7 H 0n/ i /j/o, e i4 s 7 Ff om P R -70 Z. 4 71.1 ti t %=A t>T" /ceon •�roLq (g):ff fi� Tm0P=®Uv-&0 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 W yir N G P R Realty Corp. sal C � 10841 Hesby St. N. Hollywood, CA 91601 z o us ° cc PV June 19, 1978 C$t�� cow TF'Eu'nZ:= 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATLEY 1,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.A.), O.S. (U.A.), OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL BETWEEN MONTEREY AVENUE AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre - Zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2) (U.A.) (Planned Com- mercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.) (Single-family Residen- tial, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon - Annexation), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4 (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S. (U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and Whitewater Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common ; Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9. said Doint also being Fj THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 8T 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89' 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00. 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89' 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. 5 to b2 8,000 !8)lUA) uY.1,'614wr r r 1 N(r1Y. S to PR.-5 1 (VA q 1 ' . S to (V R-1 12,000 MA.) I 1 i 1 I ' 10.( 6t 1CI1 L .. WN., (n, Vw, -C--/ .. S to P.R.- 4 MA) 1 f PtoR.{ M.A.)(a...Yr..> to • , .= ��— AM, 14Y 0(HIII<I„ LAM,.......... •........ r (M<ey— .n ... .. SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, July 13, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invi+o,i +n a++ond and ho hoard July 13, 1978 CITY OF PALM DESERT TRANSMITTAL LETTER I. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council II. REQUEST: Request for approval of a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre -zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2)(U.A.), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.), R-1 12,000(U.A.), PR-5(U.A.), PR-4(U.A.), O.S.(U.A.), or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Storm Channel between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street. III. CASE NO.: C/Z 01-78 IV. CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation. B. Draft X 1XDt)U/Ordinance No. 187 C. Review of major issues discussed by the Planningg Commission. (See P.C. minutes from meetings of May 17, and June 14, 1978 D. Planning Commission Resolution No. 367. E. Planning Commission Staff Report dated -May I 1978 and June 14 1978 . F. Portion of Planning Commission minutes dealing with the subject request. G. Related maps and/or exhibits. A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By Ordinance No. j87, approve the Change of Zone from 'S' Study to P.C.(2)(U.A.), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.), R-1 12,000(U.A.), PR-5(U.A.), PR-4(U.A.), O.S.(U.A.), or any other zone deemed appropriate. Justification is based upon: 1. Planning Commission recommendation of approval of the proposed Change of Zone as expressed in Planning Commission Resolution No. 367. 2. The proposed Change of Zone meets the objectives of the adopted Palm f , ORDINANCE NO. 187 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 107, THE PALM DESERT ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2)(U.A.), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.), R-1 12,000(U.A.), PR-5(U.A.), PR-4(U.A.) & O.S.(U.A.), ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITE - WATER STORM CHANNEL BETWEEN MONTEREY AVENUE & COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 The City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN, as follows: SECTION 1: That a portion of Ordinance 107 referencing Section 25.46-1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Map (Chapter 25.46 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code) is hereby amended to read as shown on the attached exhibit, labeled Exhibit 'A' SECTION 2: The City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, Cali- fornia, is herby directed to publish this Ordinance in the Palm Desert Post, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Palm Desert, California, and shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and the same shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the Palm Desert City Council this day of , 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COMMON SECTION A CORNEA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE e.•.[ at'• li rl. [c' '� i xuvYuui[ PNOPOUD PALM RESENT CITY LIMIT R-1 12,000 (u . a.) I I I I I 0 a Ili 1. CG' 's •x�u'..I PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT T 5 To P. R. - 5 SLCTION 17 T-S S,N-6 E S 0.8.M. C CO"C kU ' 0. C$AN Nil I 1104E 67 ACRES I JC to O.S. 660' (U-A - u 5 To PR.-5 (U. A.) SECTION 9 T-5-S, R-6-E S.8 8 M 5 to PR.-4 (u.a.) PROPOSED ICIM DESERT CITY LIMIT / �--- PALM DESERT City LIMIT - � CU.IInLu LtCL6N (,.J CON.fu J )_ i0 LOCATION MAP COUNTY Of RIVERSI OC .-PALM DESERT CITY Ll MlI - ---- PROPOSED ZONING FOR ANNEXATION NO. 5 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT (EX1101T A CASE NO. C/Z 01-78) o H d 0 O z� or 00 I1 CO y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AP- PROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR A PLANNING COMMIS- SION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FROM 'S' TO PC(2), R-2 8,000(8), R-1-12,000, PR-4, PR-5, AND O.S., UPON ANNEXATION ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS CITY ANNEXA- TION NO. 5. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert. California, did hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on the 17th day of %y, 1978, and a continued Public Hearing on the 14th day of June, 1978, to consider a Planning Commission initiated prezoning from 'S' (Study) to P.C.(2)(U.A.) (Planned Cormercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.) (Single-family residential, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexa- tion), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S. (U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), PR-3(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 3 du/acre, Upon Annexation),PR-10(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 10 du/acre, Upon Annexation) or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the White - water Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street, and more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary land of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common � Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 east, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also.being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a dis- tance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 890 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Por- tola Avenue and Country Club Drive. THENCE continuing north 890 42' 00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9, a distance of 5,307.00 feet to a point. Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Cook Street and said Country Club Drive. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 Page Two THENCE south W 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 760 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 000 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 890 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 880 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. , TIIENCE south 890 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. TIIENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 890 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, said application has met the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No. 78-32," in that an expanded initial study was developed for the project; and on this basis a negative declaration was issued and the appeal period has expired; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and argument did find the following facts and reasons to exist to revise its initial proposal to as shown on the attached Exhibit labeled Exhibit A: 1. The revised recommendation does conform to the Palm Desert General Plan to a greater degree than the initial recommendation. 2. The revised recommendation is more compatible to exist- ing and proposed zones in the area. 3. The revised recommendation provides increased mitigation measures considered appropriate after review of an ex- panded initial study conducted on the project. 4. The revised recommendation would better meet the objec- tives of the Palm Desert adopted General Plan. 5. The application of Planned Zones on a majority of the subject property provides the City the vehicle by which to control development in terms of timing; mitigation measures related to blowsand and protection of unique animals and landforms; and, compatibility of development to City Standards. 6. The area being considered for prezoning is considered a logical expansion of the Community, and the recommended zoning designations are considered compatible to the existing development in the Community. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RF.SOLVFD by tha Plnnnino CnmmiaQinn of i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 367 Page Three PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, held on the 14th day of June, 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, FLESHMAN, KRYDER NOES: KELLY, SNYDER ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman COMMON SECTION � S 4 CORNER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE c o�xix, c. ux 4xlrr I a^.i ,p l ax 1L ee' .n - NaN.E'4u�E PROPOSED PGl pl hESERI CITY LIMIT U 9 't p R-1 12,000 �U . Q•) I I i E S D a R.- 5, 104t 67 ACRES I_ $ to O.S. s es°a,'ouw ^n U.Q.) PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT S to PR.-5 SECTION 17 T-5-S,R-6-E S R.R.M. 'LpOU C. V. C.W COry FNO 0 CHANNEL SECTION 9 T-S-S,R-6-E S. b.b M Sto P.R.-4 0•Q•) PROPOSED PALM DESERT CITr LIMIT I I S to PR.-5 - -- PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT AI SECTIOr ( U.4) \ COWAN v5rr--0�-' IMON SECTION N NE@ J 5 N w !0CATION MAP � e4I ro e..0 0 F u B 9 11 16 9 � IO F- ---COUNTY OF ROVER51DE PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT PROPOSED ZONING FOR ANNEXATION NO. 5 TO THE CITY OF PALM DESERT (EXHIBIT A CASE NO. C/Z 01-78) CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Change of Zone for Proposed Annexation No. 5 Case No.: C/Z 01-78 Applicant: PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED Date: May 17, 1978 I. REQUEST: Consideration of a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to P.C.(2)(U.A.) (Planned Commercial, District, Upon An- nexation), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexa- tion), PR-5 W.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4 (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S. (U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), PR-3 (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 3 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-10 (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 10 du/acre, Upon Annexation) or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By Planning Commission Resolution No. recommend approval to the City Council of a Change of Zone from 'S' to P.C.(2)(U.A.), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.), R-1-12,000 (U.A.), PR-5(U.A.), PR-4(U.A.), and O.S.(U.A.) for the property under consideration. Justification is based upon: 1. The revised recommendation does conform to the Palm Desert General Plan to a greater degree than the initial recommendation. 2. The revised recommendation is more compatible to existing and proposed zones in the area. 3. The revised recommendation provides increased mitigation measures con- sidered appropriate after review of an expanded initial study conducted on the project. 4. The revised recommendation would better meet the objectives of the Palm Desert adopted General Plan. 5. The application of Planned Zoneson a majority of the subject property provides the City the vehicle by which to control development in terms of timing; mitigation measures related to blowsand and protection of Case ';0. •''�� 01-7 "ay 1973 III. C.C.NTENTS OF 2EPORT: A. Background B. Discussion C. Draft Resolution D. Related Exhibits 1. Major circulation 2. Adjacent Zoning 3. Letter from Mr. H. Hirsch 4. Initial Study including comments from responsible agencies. 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 340 initiating Prezoning Procedures. IV. BACKGROUND: A. Size: 1046.67 acres B. General Plan Land Use Designations: 5-15 acre District Commercial 5-7 acre Institutional 1037-1045 gross acre medium density residential, 5-7 du/acre C. Adjacent Zoning: See Exhibit 2 attached D. Average Residential Density Recommended: 4.48 du per gross acre V. DISCUSSION: A. Introduction: On February 28, 1978, the Planning Commission, by Resolution No. 340, did initiate prezoning proceedings on the subject property. Since then, the Staff has been reviewing the environmental impacts of the various alternative zoning designations for the subject property. Please note the attached expanded initial study. In addition there has been corres- pondence with several property owners in said area. The property in question contains approximately 1,050 acres and con- sists of various sized parcels, ranging from as small as 5 acres in size along Hovely Lane to as large as 170 acres at the Whitewater Chan- nel and Portola Avenue (extended). The area is generally vacant except for an existing residence on Hovely Lane. Existing access to the area is provided from Monterey Avenue, Cook Street, and Country Club Drive. B. General Plan Designation: base %0. C"7 U1-73 Aay ,7, 1973 VI DISC;;SSiON: (font.) General Plan Cesignation: (Cont.) The residential land area of approximately maximum potential dwelling unit range of 4, General Plan Land Use designation of medium However, the Staff believes that this range basis of: :s:e7H..:;2 925 acres would have a .795 to 5,157 under the density residential. will be reduced on the Mitigation of moderate blowsand condition in the area. Potential development pattern in the area because of large ownerships. Mitigation of possible environmental affects. Therefore, the recommended zoning designations would provide a maximum density of approximately 4,175 dwelling units or 4.42 d.u. per acre. ANALYSIS OF RECOMMENDED ZONE DESIGNATIONS: Introduction: Since the initiation of the prezoning procedures, the proposed zoning designations have been refined in two specific areas. First, is the corner of Country Club Drive and Cook Street which Staff had tentatively designated as potentially PC(2) and PR-10; on the basis of a potential development plan for all the property in the north half of the section between Portola and Cook Street. However, this potential development did not come about. Therefore, it is recommended that the total area be designated as PR-4. This would not preclude a future consideration of a total development plan on this area, and some revision of the Zone Designations in this area. Secondly, the approximate 170 acre parcel at the northwest corner of the Whitewater`Channel and Portola Avenue (extended) is being recom- mended for a PR-5 designation, instead of the previous recommendation of PR-4. This recommendation is based upon compatibility to adjacent zoning to the north, west and east. Please note attached Exhibit 2 for adjacent zoning. Review of Recommended Designations: The recommended Zoning districts proposed for the subject property can be broken down into four general classifications which will be discussed below. The final recommendation is less dense than allowed under the land use designations in the General Plan. This reduction is the result of serious review of the environmental concerns for the area, as shoo-in in the attached, expanded initial study. The following reflects the projected impacts of the recommended zone districts: (see next ❑anal SUMMARY TABLE Or RECOMMENDED ZONING DWELLING UNIT AND POPULATION DENSITIES Populatir Proposed Permitted Approximate Gross Number of Estimated Dwelling Unit Density n ine _ Use _ Acreage Units Permitted Populationa Density DU/Acre -Persons/I Planned Cor merc i a 1 Vistrict 9 rl/Ab N/Ab NIAb NIAt r1.S. Open Space 110 N/Ab N/Ab N/Ab N/Ab 1,-2 P,0n0(8) Residential 28 152 365 5.4 13.0 R-1(I-,ono) Pesidential 60 218 523 3.6 8.7 1'R-5 Residential 425 2125 5100 5.0 12.0 1'R-4 Residential 420 1680 4032 4.0 7.2 total 1052 4175 10,020d 4.48d 10.76' hBased on 1976 Special Census data of 2.4 persons per dwelling unit. Not applicable. ,t DasPd on 1976 Special Census data of .4 school age children (5-19 yrs.) per dwelling unit. (rased upon a residential acreage of 931 acres. ILs2 .i _ J 4dy 1 Ie .'VE'.CFD iF G: 1ONS: (Cont. Review of Recommended Desi-,nations: (Cont.) The proposed residential designations consist of tyro categories - Planned Residential and Single-family. The Planned Residential, which is the largest classification proposed (91; of residential area) is broken almost equally into two density classifications 4 and S units to the acre. The single family designation is also broken into two categories - 12,000 sq. ft. lot min. and 8,000 so. ft. lot min. The smaller lot designation is recommended adjacent to the proposed commercial center. The Commission will be consider- ing a Development Plan for this area which inaicates how this re- sidential area will relate to the proposed Commercial development. Staff believes that the proposed 8,000 sq. ft. lot development will act as an excellent and unique buffer for the proposed com- mercial center. This approach is preferred to the more traditional procedure of using apartments as the buffering element. The Staff cannot, therefore, support the points made by the Rancho Mirage Planning Commission in their letter on this matter, which is a part of the Development Plan report. The second proposed single-family designation of 12,000 sq. ft. lot min. is proposed for the southwest corner of the intersection of Country Club Dri've and Portola Avenue (extended). This parcel is considered desirable for such a designation on the basis of: good access, suitable size, and view potential. Therefore, Staff cannot support the request of Mr. Hirsch in his letter attached hereto as Exhibit 3, for a substantially greater density. Further, Mr. Hirsch's request is for a zoning designation of R-1-7,500 sq. ft. (average), is less than the minimum of 8,000 sq. ft. allowed under the City's Zoning Ordinance, Therefore, there is no way that the Commission can consider Mr. Hirsch's request. Circulation Pattern: Exhibit 1, attached hereto, describes the proposed major circulation elements for the subject property. Said system provides for the ex- tension of Portola Avenue northerly to Country Club Drive and the widening of Cook Street, Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. Said plan also provides for the extension of Hovely Lane to Cook Street on the basis of an 88 ft. right-of-way. In addition, a new street connection, mid -block between Portola Avenue and Monterey Avenue, is proposed to connect Hovely Lane to Country Club Drive. Staff envisions the area developing west to east, which is exemplified by the fact that the only development plans filed for the area is ad- jacent to Monterey Avenue. Because of the large parcels east of Per- tola Avenue (extended), an additional north -south connection between Hovely Lane and Country Club Drive is envisioned, but is not shown at this time. Further, special consideration will have to be given to this road extension in relation to the existing industrial zoning south of the subject property, so that none of the industrial related traffic is directed through the residential area to the north. Finally, haraucc nP 4-6n I—- Cas2 ^. ;1-7 '?ay 17, i973 or a;;,•,L: - 7�,.c,;�E�;cE� zo;� - :c';,',T:r,•u: (cunt ` i D. Environmental Analysis: (cont.) of the level of the projects being considered. The projrr-t :,eir,; considered by the City includes annexation, prezoning, and ccnsid- eration of specific development on 3.7'3 of the total area. The City's General Plan Environmental Impact Report Analysis was on the basil' of a worst possible case which in the area under consideration would include a 15 acre commercial center and a seven unit to the acre residential development or approximately 6,153 units. The recommended zoning designations substantially reduces the limits of this analysis to a 9.3 (62') acre commercial center and a maximum of 4.43 units per acre or a maximum of 4,175 (69',) du. Given the necessary blowsand measures and development standards of the City, it is projected conservatively that a maximum of 2,756 du or 45" of the projected development under the General Plan EIR, analysis will result in the area under consideration. This finding is exemplified by the Mc Bail residential development which under the requested zoning could result in a maximum of 152 dwelling units. Whereas, the actual develop- ment proposed is 101 dwelling units or 671 permitted under the zoning and 46'; of the density considered under the General Plan EIR. There- fore, in terms of magnitude, the potential development in the subject area will be less than previously considered under the City's General Plan EIR. The State in an effort to streamline the Environmental procees, effective January 1, 1978, implemented several revisions to the Guidelines. One procedure implemented was the development of the Initial Study procedure. Said procedure requires initial contact prior to a determination on a project with responsible agencies to get their input. Further, it allows the lead agency (Palm Desert) to identify environmental impacts and to modify the project to mitigate those impacts. In addition, the new guidelines allow reliance on previous EIR's so that further environ- mental analysis would focus on the potentially significant environmental effects. Procedurally this approach is almost as detailed as develop- ing an EIR and requires a similar amount of Staff time. Based upon the above described procedure, the original project has been significantly reduced to allow mitigation of the major adverse affects of blowsand, unique landforms and animal life. Finally, these new pro- cedures allow the City to analyze each subsequent actual development from an environmental standpoint in order to provide further mitigation measures and to wrestle with the major issue of direct impacts at a level which is meaningful, versus making unsubstantial predictions which cannot be qualified at this level of analysis. CITY OF PALM DESERT SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Change of Zone Applicant: PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED Case No.: C/Z 01-78 Date: June 14, 1978 I. INTRODUCTION: This matter was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of May 17, to allow additional information regarding concerns that the Planning Commission had in specific areas. These areas dealt with questions re- garding the property to be zoned open space and i^le impact upon schools. This report will attempt to provide responses to these concerns. II. CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation. B. Draft Resolution No. 367. C. Review of alternatives regarding open space area. D. Discussion of school impacts. E. Appendix - 1. Recent correspondence received. 2. Portions of General Plan regarding the Sand Dune Park concept. 3. Newspaper article regarding Sand Dune Preservation 4. Background from previous Staff Report on the subject matter. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By Planning Commission Resolution No. recommend approval to the City Council of a Change of Zone from 'S' to P.C.(2)(U.A.), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.), R-1-12,000 (U.A.), PR-5(U.A.), PR-4(U.A.), and O.S.(U.A.) for the property under consideration. Justification is based upon: 1. The revised recommendation does conform to the Palm Desert General Plan to a greater degree than the initial recommendation. 2. The revised recommendation is more comoatihlp to PYicHnn Ana �.,a Case No. C/Z 01-78 June 14, 1978 IV. REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES REGARDING OPEN SPACE: At the May 17, Planning Commission meeting a great deal of discussion revolved around the matter of the property shown as open space. This dealt with the area known as the Sand Dune Park. A great deal of testi- mony was given as to concern for maintenance of that area in a natural state and its resulting impact upon downwind properties. Said input dealt particularly with a 40 acre portion of the area immediately adjacent to Portola Avenue and northerly of the former Sun King Mobile Home Park. This issue of the Sand Dune Park can be best understood if everyone is aware of the parameters related to such facility. The Draft Parks and Recreation Element defines the proposed Sand Dune Park as a 150 acre parcel. This is a modification of the total size, as expressed in the City's adopted General Plan which indicates a much larger acreage. This reduction was based upon the recent review by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission. Ninety acres of this facility is located in the proposed annexation area and is proposed to be pre -zoned open space as a part of this application. A majority of said property is presently zoned W-2 under the County or controlled development area. While a majority of and the best sand dunes are located within this 150 acre area there are additional dunes located in the general area. In a recent blowsand study done by the Coachella Valley Area of Governments Agency, this property is located within the one cubic yard transport con- tour area, which means that approximately one cubic yard of sand is moved in the wind direction per year. The property in question is considered a unique desert land form and is designated in the General Plan as the habi- tat for an endangered species, the Fringe Toed Lizard. To adequately analyze the importance expressed by the General Plan regarding the Sand Dune Park, please find in the Appendix of this report all General Plan references dealing with the Sand Dune Park. The alternatives related to the open space designation in this change of zone application are as follows: First, an open space designation does re- quire the City to acquire the property at its market value at some point in the future. The ninety acres which is included in this application could be acquired through a combination of funding programs by the City; with up to 50% being funded through the State under their Land and Water Conservation Fund Program which provides for just over six million dollars for Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. The purpose of this grant program is to acquire areas of natural significance. In the Staff discussion with the State it appears that sufficient monies will be available to utilize this funding pro- gram for this acquisition. However, the local share for acquisition of ninety acres of land may not be feasible for the City, unless some of the area was donted as a gift to the City. Therefore, the ultimate size of the park would have to be based to some degree upon the City's ability to fund its acquisition. The second alternative would be to remove the open space designation and place an appropriate developmental zone on the property. Before this could be ac- complished, it would require a modification of the Parks and Recreation Ele- ment wich is being considered at this meeting by the Planning Commission. Further, other General Plan Amendments would be necessary. If this alternative were selected, the Staff would suggest that this pre -zoning matter be divided at Portola and no consideration on any of the property be made easterly of Portola until the appropriate decision regarding the General Plan Amendment could be pursued. Support for this approach exists in the attached letter from the attorney for Mr. Ted Weiner, an owner of property westerly of Portola Case No. CJZ 01-78 June 14, 1978 IV. REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES REGARDING OPEN SPACE: (Cont., If one were to review the attached segments of the General Plan and the proposed Master Plan of Parks and Recreation, one would find that some portion of the proposed Sand Dune Park would have to be developed for recreational purposes to meet the estimated recreational needs of the Community. Therefore, the name Sand Dune Park may be a misnomer and the Commission should perhaps consider the designation of open space to imply a public park. Pursuant to the Parks and Recreation Element, the actual development or non -development of a portion or all of said park would de- pend upon subsequent detailed survey and analysis of the recreational needs of the Community and the environmental impacts of subsequent development of said area. Therefore, on the basis of the General Plan and the Draft Parks and Recreation Element, the Staff would suggest that no alternative be considered that would result in total elimination of the Sand Dune Park. It is believed that this is a viable, environmentally sensitive area that includes a unique land form that needs to be preserved and cannot be simply eliminated. Assuming that the park lands were acquired, regardless of its configuration, there would be related maintenance cost. Initially the cost of installation of blowsand protection on the south and east would be needed. Its cost would not be substantial since the actual installation would be supplemental to blowsand improvements that would be installed as a part of development. Subsequent improvements to said area would have related maintenance costs which should be analyzed at that time and cannot be determined at this point. In weighing all the alternatives regarding this matter, the Staff would recommend that the size of the O.S. area be reduced to 60 acres or the total park area be limited to 120 acres. The recommended alternative is shown on the following graphic. _j o F IM^.SECT. C d ORcl1. il P.R.-3 ( U.A.) i , F o PROPOSED P4LM DE`.ERI CITY LIMIT W �^ W ¢ ~ > i y `o Y c) 5 O O.S. S.I., S.P. i - _ _- -- VIM DESERT �iIY LIMIT --COON IY Of RNLR)IDE Case "+o. C/Z 01-78 June 14, 1978 IV. REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES REGARDING OPEN SPACE: (Cont.) This recommendation is based upon the following: It is.questionable that the City would be financially capable of acquiring a total of 90 acres for park purposes. The MacDonald 40 acres would be particularly expensive since it means acquiring the total parcel. Whereas, the rest of the park area is portions of much larger property, some of which could be acquired as a part of development through the City's Community Facilities requirement of the Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed reduction would maintain the appropriate wind orienta- tion to extend the life of the sand dunes. 3. Development along Portola would buffer the park from excessive access by motorized vehicles and would better intigrate the park into the neighborhood. It is recommended that the area taken out of the O.S. designation be placed in the PR-4 zone district. V. SCHOOL IMPACTS: Based upon the concerns expressed by the Commission at the May 17, meeting we have reviewed the school impacts of said pre -zoning with the representa- tives of the school district. They indicate that previous history of condo- minium development in the Community would indicate to them that each condo- minium constructed would provide a maximum of a half a child per unit, or the maximum of 1670 kids as provided in the previous report; Based upon po- tential construction activity in this area and the construction activity in the Palm Desert Country Club area, officials of the school district feel that a school would have to be provided near Country Club Drive. However, they feel that it should be located easterly of Cook Street to be more centrally located to the areas generating children. The Staff has been in contact with the owners of the property at the southeast corner of the intersection of Cook Street and Country Club Drive, and it appears feasible to obtain a school site for the district approximately one half mile to a mile easterly of Cook Street. The district officials feel confident that this facility would meet the needs for the area under consideration. When taken in conjunction with the existing school facilities of the district. The actual class composition of this new school would be flexible and be dependent on the capacity of other facilities, new and existing, in the Cove area. APPENDIX uciLe C rms son y , Inc. h"lt" May 24, 1978 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City Hall Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: Case No. C/Z 01-78 Gentlemen: As it may not be possible for me to attend the June 14th meeting, I wish to register my opposition to the proposed change of zone for the above case. I am a resident of the Portola Country Club Estates (formerly Sun King) and find it a very desireable place to live with one exception ---the blowing sand. I was aware of the problem when I made my decision to move there, but I was also aware of the development taking place on the surrounding property and, therefore, was willing to put up with the inconvenience of constantly cleaning sand out of everything for a short period of time. If the Commission is not familiar with the physical property, possibly a field trip would be in order so they could see first hand what it is going to mean to property owners to be faced with open space forever. It is impossible to have doors or windows open which face the north and west as the slightest breeze stirs the loose sand and creates a problem. Not only is it time and labor consuming to be constantly fighting the sand, but it is also damaging to property and investments there are not in the lower bracket. To purchase a lot and complete a house with the necessary amenities, one is faced with an absolute minimum of $80,000 and even today, when we have all learned to live with inflation, that is not a miserly sum. Sincerely, ii' v f `% i, " Lucile C. Armstronj / ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT 73661 HIGHWAY 111 P.O. BOX 1316 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 1114) 346-5607 _J LAW OFFICES R-OEMEIZ AND HAMWI DEL AMO FINANCIAL CE N TrR SUITE 127O UNION BANK -OWER 21515 HAWTHORNE SOULE`159D TORRANCE. CALIFORNIA 90503 12I31 370-45O7 - 912,iCna F11E NO May 19, 1978 Paul A. Williams, A.I.P. Director of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Mr. Williams: As you may remember, we represent Mr. Ted. Weiner. We met last week regarding proposed City Annexation 'No. 5. Mr. Weiner's property is generally located at the northwest corner of the Whitewater Channel and Portola Avenue (extended). We attended the Planning Commission meeting on May 17, 1978. It seems obvious that the ''OS" designa- tion for Mr. McDonald's property is the only item of major controversy. As I have previously indicated, the "PR-5" zone designation for Mr. Weiner's property is satisfactory with our client. We, therefore, do not want to get caught -up in the emotions of the "OS" problem and hereby request that the Petition for Annexation filed by Mr. Weiner on or about February 22, 1978, be severed from Proposed Annexation No. 5 and be treated separately. There would appear to be a logical basis for this approach as Mr. Weiner's property virtually stands alone in relation to the other parcels under consideration. This, coupled with the imminent development of the surrounding property by Mr. Bone, would seem to dictate that the concurrent development of the Weiner property and Bone property would be beneficial and minimize the inconven- ience in the neighborhood during construction. Since the current proposal was continued to June 14, 1978, it apparently will not be considered by the Council until July at the earliest. 1. Paul A. Williams, A.I.P. May 19, 1978 Page - Two - Mr. Weiner is most anxious to proceed with his Plans for development and he would prefer to do it as part of the City, but not if this means extensive delays due to the annexation problems of other property owners. _I Please advise at your earliest opportunity if it will be possible to proceed with annexation independently of the remaining parcels in Annexation No. 5. Thank you for your cooperation. RIP,:br cc: Mr. Ted Weiner Yours very truly, RO ND HAPdSdI Richard I. Roemer ENDII`f OF.EPAL l DESERTS PORTIONS OF GENERAL PLAN REGARDING SAND DUNE PARK 0 BACKGROUND Regional Context The framework for the Palm Desert Land Use pattern is regional in nature; it has been generated by environmental factors, population trends, economic factors and locational decisions that, in many cases, are external to the City or result from regional circula- tion patterns. As Palm Desert continues to develop, Valley serving uses and regional environmental factors such as blowsand, hillside preserva- tion and natural reserves will continue to exert strong pressures on the local land use pattern. Dealing with many of the regional issues that will confront the period will require a creative Coachella Valley over the and cooperative planning approach by the various public agencies serving the area. While Palm Desert will necessarily play an increasingly important role in the development of the Valley, it should be noted that much of the new residential development will occur outside the existing corporate limits where large tracts of vacant land are readily available. As these tracts are developed, they will have a strong influence on the desirability of the City and its image as a quality community. Existing Land Use Palm Desert's 8.86 square miles contain a variety of land uses that have developed in response to socially determined decisions, economic growth, and technological change. The patterns that exist within the City are not random. They have been generated by the comparative advantages of certain areas for various uses, and the existing patterns will necessarily have a large impact on the City's policies for future land uses. The table on page l.B.l.a (Figure 1-1) identifies the City's current land use inventory, while the air photo (Figure 1-2) illustrates +! the development pattern associated with the current inventory. Im r 'I FIGURE 1-1 EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY USE ACRES Residential Very Low Density 145.1 2.6 Low Density 428.8 7.6 Medium Density 390.3 6.9 High Density 59.0 1.0 Commercial 68.9 1.2 Industrial -- -- Institutional 216.5 3.8 Agriculture 232.6 4.1 Open Space Public 86.1 1.5 Private 176.3 3.1 Vacant (includes roads) 3866.7 68.2 TOTAL CITY 5670.3 100.0 1.3.1.a Zo� 4z ZION: } Major factors evident within the existing land use pattern include: 1. The low density character of the residential areas. Palm Desert residential areas are developing at densities averaging. from approximately 4.5 to 5 living units per residential acre. Densities in this rance create a development 'pattern that is land intensive. Residential areas occupy approximately 1023 acres or 18.1 percent of the total City area. While densities similar to those of Palm Desert are not unusual, they tend to result in a sprawling residential pattern that increases public service cost. 2. Commercial.areas within the City are dispersed along Highway III and Ei Paseo. The.pattern of development in this area is similar to commercial strip areas found throughout other portions of the Coachella Valley. Recently the pattern of development along .the Highway III/El Paseo area solidified with: (1) El Paseo developing as a major specialty retail and office area; (2) the western portions of the Highway III area becoming the 'primary shopping area anchored by Palms to Pines Center; and (3) the north side of Highway III becoming oriented toward service, automotive related and office commercial uses. 3. Public uses, with the exception of the College of the ,Desert and other educational uses, are currently clustered at the eastern end of El Paseo with the Post Office, Library, tampo- rary City Hall, and CVAG Offices as the primary uses. While this area is developing as the principal civic area it should be noted that the primary public office space .is within private structures and the expansion potential for public uses is limited. 4. Educational uses within the planning area include the College of the Desert, Washington and Lincoln Schools and the Palm Desert. Middle School. These facilities and facilities cur- rently under study by the Desert Sands Unified School District represent potential structuring elements for the residential areas. The College of the'Desert, an existing Facility, and the proposed cultural center may provide a citywide focal point and represent the nucleus for the City's major civic area. 5. Open spaces within the City and the Sphere of InFI'uence include the Living Desert Reserve, University of California at Riverside's Deep Canyon Research Center, existing date groves, the Big Horn Sheep Reserve and Sand Dune areas to the north of the White -water Flood Control Channel. 1.B.2 These existing -open space areas provide a major structuring element to the City and Sphere of Influence, and if integrated into the C,ity's development pattern will provide strong community identity and direction to the nature and type of growth that will occur. Problems Problems identified within the existing development context include.: The regional nature of the urbanization process impacting Palm Desert and the lack of clearly defined responsibilities for guiding regional growth as it relates to the City of Palm Desert. The nature of the development process which may generate development of large residential areas outside the current corporate limits of Palm Desert and result in urban sprawl with its resultant i:ncreases�in service costs. The scattered development pattern within the existing_ cor- porate limits which makes development of some of the individual parcels uneconomic at current densities. The nature of the existing commercial development that has dispersed retail facilities over an extensive area and could ultimately' limit the deveiopment of a viable downtown retail core. Opportunities Opportunities evident in the existing development context include: The potential to preserve major open space areas that will give form and structure to the development pattern. The potential to provide major focal points within the community based on existing and proposed developments such as the College of the Desert and Eisenhower Medical Center. The potentia,l.to structure residental areas as distinct communities related to schools and other public facilities. The potential to develop innovative residential areas due to the undeveloped status of major land holdings within the City and Sphere of Influence. The potential to strengthen the existing commercial core through.. addition of a major retail complex and associated specialty retail facilities. I-B.3 The Land Use Plan The Land Use Plan (Figure 1-3)includes recommendations for each of the major land uses represented within the City and the Sphere of Influence. The basic structuring elements included in the Plan are: 1. University of California Deep Canyon Research Center 2. The mountainous and foothill areas to the south of the existing corporate boundaries. 3. The Highway Ill/El Paseo Commercial Areas 4. The College of the Desert 5. Eisenhower Medical Center 6. The Whitewater Wash 7. The Sand Dune areas north of the Whitewater Wash 8. Interstate 10 9. The Living Desert Reserve Each of these elements represent dominant factors within the exist- ing land use context that offer identity and physical structure to the community. Commercial Area Commerei.al areas recommended in the Plan include a variety of commercial uses clustered into series of regional, convenience and specialized activity centers. Regional Commercial/Core Area Commercial Regional and Core Commercial areas are recommended adjacent to Highway 111 and El Paseo, extending from the westerly intersection of El Paseo/Highway I11 and Highway 74 on the west to the corporate limits on the east. Commercial uses within this area provide the primary retail and office space for Palm Desert and the Sphere of Influence. Develop- ments will consist of: 1. Full line retail outlets serving the entire Coachella Valley. 2. Speciality retail uses located within shopping centers and individual shops along Highway III and El Paseo. 3. Office uses oriented toward the professional and financial community. 4. Eating, drinking and entertainment uses including a variety of restaurants and hotel facilities. 5. Service and Automotive related commercial uses. 1.B.4 Industrial Areas , i Industrial areas are legated in 2 groupings including: j= 1,187.6 acres adjacent to the Southern Pacific right-of-way and Interstate 10 in the northern portion of the planning area. i 142.2 acres west and east of Cook Street and north of the White - water Flood Control Channel. These areas are proposed as industrial/business parks with uses oriented toward storage, distribution, assembly, service commercial, and research and office facilities. So that local residents and visitors to Palm Desert may have convenient access to local vehicle and equipment storage areas, a small service in- dustrial area of not more than three (3) acres in size shall be estab- lished west of the intersection of Painter's Path and 44th Avenue. Public/Institutional Uses Public uses are discussed fully in the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan and include a variety of uses that are to be interspersed within the residential neighborhoods. Major focal points within the public facility network include: Eisenhower Medical Center; College of the Desert and the associated Cultural and Civic Center areas; Living Desert Reserve. Open Space The Open Space network is discussed fully in the Urban Design Element, Public Facilities Element and the Open Space Element. Generally, the system includes: A system of recreational parks located throughout the residential neighborhoods. Natural Reserves including: The Big Horn Sheep Reservation The Deep Canyon Research Center The Living Desert Reserve. The Whitewater Flood Control Channel. The Date Palm Preservation Area. Ii Hillside and mountain areas in the southern portion of the Plan's sphere. 1.B.7 (REVISED 3/10/77) IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES While implementation .policies are covered fully in the implementa- tion Element of'the Plan, the general policies for land use are: DEVELOPMENT OF LAND USE REGULATIONS THAT WILL ENCOURAGE INFILL HOUSING IN DEVELOPED SECTIONS OF THE CITY AND PROVIDE FOR INNOVATIVE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN -UNDEVELOPED AREAS. ENSURE DEVELOPMENT IS ADEQUATELY SERVED BY UTILITIES AND PUBLIC FACILITIES AT THE TIME OF OCCUPANCY. BALANCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL AREAS WITH THE DEVELOP- MENT OF REVENUE GENERATING USES. TIME THE ZONING FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL AREAS WITH LAND ABSORPTION TRENDS FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES WITHIN THE COACHELLA VALLEY AGGRESSIVELY PURSUE A PROGRAM FOR THE UNIFICATION AND INTE- GRATION OF THE CORE COMMERCIAL AREA TO INSURE ITS VIABILITY AS THE MAJOR SHOPPING COMPLEX. DEVELOP PROGRAMS FOR OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION BASED ON ACQUISITION OF FEE TITLE AS WELL AS OTHER CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES. ACTIVELY PROMOTE A PROGRAM FOR THE CONTINUED COOPERATION OF ALL LAND PLANNING AGENCIES WITHIN THE PALM DESERT SPHERE OF INFLUENCE. EXAMINE ALL DEVELOPMENT IN LIGHT OF THE EFFECT ON AIR QUALITY, WATER, AND ENERGY. FIGURE?d URBAN DESIGN ABSTRACT i .•. Districts Entry Points FPoints hS.,jor Trail System Components Cure Area r - ''1 ^•^ College of Dcscrtf Civic Center I_inl.agr Preserve - _ -.; ❑ Landmark %Iajar Open Spaces ' _ :J -� indhreak C"111111crrla! Snl,arcas j — ---- - _ Im!u.trial Subarras { - -_ ..'I Instinniunal Su6arcas . _. Ocscrt Corridors NORTIf 0 2 t.Ules 3 2 GJ• Neighborhoods are conceived as basic residential and identification units varying in population from 400 to 9000 people. Focal Points Within the various districts of the planning area are focal points related to either major institutions or natural features. Key focal points include: Eisenhower Medical Center Sand Dune Park College of the Desert Civic Center Cultural Center Living Desert Reserve Boyd Research Center - University of California at Riverside The Core Commerical area The focal points are important in providing a special sense of identity for Palm Desert and in reflecting the City's role as a central place in the Coachella Valley. Entry Points The planning area has a number of entry points from adjacent juris- dictions or areas. These include: The freeway interchanges; The transition areas from the adjacent jurisdictions of Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells; and The transition from the mountains to the alluvial fans on Highway 74. Landmarks Within the various districts there are a number of potential orienta- tion points. Potential landmarks are often located at the natural focal points discussed above. These are areas where buildings of special height, size or architectural character would be appropriate to give a sense of orientation or direction; or areas of an unusual natural character combined with a key position in. the circulation system. Key existing or potential landmarks areas include: Areas related to the approaches from the Interstate system; Areas related to the approaches to the Commerical Core Area from Highway 111, Highway 74 and San Pablo; and The potential axial relationships between the Core Area, College of the Desert, Civic Complex and Cultural Center, al mac] 1hPLEMENTAT ION POLICIES The City shall; CONTINUE TO COCRDI!IATE ITS PLANNING 'dITH INTERESTED AGENCIES, PROPERTY O'dNERS AND INSTITUTIONS IN ALL DISTRICTS. DEVELOP A CITY OF VARIED LIVING UNITS COMPOSED OF DISTRICTS, NEIGHBORHOODS AND PROJECTS. ESTABLISH A PLANNING PROCESS FOR CREATING GOOD CEIGii:ORH'OD DESIGN. Such a process night be done by private planners of the land ov:ncrs controlling the'development .within a particular neigh- borhood; or, it night be done by thc.,City in cooperation with developers, • UTILIZE PP.Oi�ISIOh!S OF ITS ZONING ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE GUIDE- LINES IN AREAS SUCH AS HILLSIDES,, CIVIC AREAS AND OTIiER SPECIAL AREAS. CONTINUE TO DEVELOP MC"E DETAILED PLANS FOR SPECIAL AREAS, SUCH AS THE COnE AREA AIJO CIVIC CENTER, AS THE NEED FOR MORE C SPECIFIC PLANNING DEC0ES APPARENT.. PROVIDE ATTRACTIVE AND SUITABLE LANDSCAPING ON ALL MAJOR STREETS AND G.ATEidAYS TO THE'CITY, DEVELOP PARKS FOR RECREATION AND OPE14 SPACE PRESERVATION WHICH MWNTAIN THE NATURAL DESERT ENVIRONMENT. UTILIZE THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING AND DESIGid REVIEW ORDINANCES TO PAINTAIN THE BEAUTY OF'THE MOUNTAIN AREAS SURROUNDING PALM DESERT. ESTABLISH A14 EDUCATIO!IAL PROCESS TO MAKE LOCAL CITIZENS AWARE OF THE CONT,IUUING NEED -TO UPGRADE THE VISUAL QUALITIES OF THE CITY BY PRESERVING THE NATUPAL ENVIRONMENT AND BY REQUIRING HIGH QUALITY IN MAN -FADE DEVELOPMENT. ESTABLISH A PV:CNING PROCESS TO STUDY NIGHT LIGHTING PPOBLEMS. MAKE ADEQUATE PROVISION FOR SHADE WHEN PLANNING FOR PARKS, PEDESTRIAN ArEAS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARKING LOTS, AND TRANSIT COPRIDORS IN THE CITY. UTILIZE INDIGE;;OUS PLANTS IN LANDSCAPING WIICNr..VER APPROPRIATE. ESTABLISH A CGIPREHEL'SIVE SET OF LIME -OF -SIGHT CRITERIA TO BE USED FOR !lth DEVELUXENT. 2,P.1 (Rev. 8/75) 6.4 CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT INTRODUCTION The need for open space within and adjacent to the urban environ- ment is greater than just for its role in providing areas with traditional forms of recreation. Open space allows for the oreser- vation of natural assets which cannot coexist with development. These include wildlife and their habitats, scenic vistas; unusual land form -conditions, significant vegetation, as well as significant agriculture and mineral resources. Incorporating factors such as those listed above into an open space systemcontributes to the direct or indirect enjoymeni'and,benefit of all. A break Fs established in the urban structure which results in visual relief, diversity, texture and Pattern. Open space can also be used to 'set aside those areas that have a potential danger to man should he develop them. Dangers from earthquake, landslide, fire, and erosion can be minimized by their incorporation into the open space system. 6.4.i. 1 BACKGROUND State legislation defines open space land as "any parcel of land or water which is essentially unimproved and devoted to an open space use". Open space uses include production of food and fiber, enjoyment of scenic beauty, recreation and the use of natural resources. This legislation requires local agencies to identify lands that qualify for open space designation under the following guidelines: j 111. Open space for the preservation of natural resources, J including but not limited to, areas required for the preservation of plant and animal life, including habitat for fish and wildlife species; areas required J7 for ecologic and other scientific study purposes; rivers, streams, bays and estuaries; and coastal beaches, lake - shores, banks of rivers and streams, and watershed lands. 2. Open space used for the managed production of resources, including, but not limited to, forest lands, rangeland, agricultural lands and areas of economic importance for the production of food or fiber; areas required for recharge of groundwater basins; bays, estuaries, marshes, rivers and streams which are important for the manage- ment of commercial fisheries; and areas containing major mineral deposits, including those in short supply. 3. Open space for outdoor recreation, including, but not limited to, areas of outstanding scenic, historic and cultural value; areas particularly suited for park and recreation 'purposes, including access to lakeshores, beaches, and rivers and streams; and areas which serve as links between major recreation and open space reser- vations, including utility easements, banks of rivers and streams, trails, and scenic highway corridors. 4. Open space for public health and safety, including, but not limited to, areas which require special management or regulation because of hazardous or special conditions such as earthquake fault zones, unstable soil areas, flood plains, watersheds, areas presenting high fire risks, areas required for the protection of water quality and water reservoirs and areas required for the pro- tection and enhancement of air quality.111 Stater of California, Government Codes, Sec. 65560fb1. 6.4.B.1 17, F1 The Natural Context For Coen Space In Palm Desert The Palm Desert area can be roughly divided into two major zones (see Figure 6.4-1): 1. The Valley floor consisting primarily of cresote scrub and sand dunes; this zone also includes the bajada, a nearly flat surface of joined erosional deposits along the base of the San Jacinto Mountain range. The present urban area is located at the boundary between the desert floor and the bajada. 2. The San Jacinto Mountains which rise sharply just south of the City limits. The mountain environment consists of four basic life zones: (a) permanent and seasonal water, i.e., the bottoms of canyons which form this zone's drainage pattern, (b) the low desert which starts at the edge of the foot- hills and rises to about 1000 feet, (c) the high desert between 1000 feet and 3000 feet, and (d) pinyon scrub with some juniper from 3000 feet to 5141 feet (the too of Sheep Mountain which is the highest point in the planning area). Criteria For The Establishment of Coen Space Consideration of areas for open space was based on a number of natural and cultural factors which are listed below: 1. Natural Factors • The various biotic provinces (those areas which have basically the same flora and fauna (Figure 6.4-2). There are no unique or rare plants in the planning area. • Unique wildlife is of special concern in the planning area (Figure 6.4-2). There is one endangered and one rare species of animal, as defined by the California Department of Fish and Game, within the City's Sphere of Influence. Designated a rare species the California Bighorn Sheep (ovis canadensis californiana) occupies virtually the entire mountain zone from about 1000 feet to the too of Sheep Mountain (5141 feet). This animal is a fully protected mammal under State law. 1 6.4.B.2 I. - il 11 F. I F F-I 1 &4A.2.& .. z r._ qy..� ... - 4 n_a G�D 4-D FIGURE 6.4.2 WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION VEGETATION: F. Sand dunes and creosote scrub > L. Baiada E r3. Riparian 311. Lw desert Hil,b desert ` 6 Pitnun scrub and juniper UNIOUE WILDLIFE: A. Fail Fua B. Coachella Vdllav Frinecd-Tnad Liurd C. Flat -sided Ilnrned L,rard D. Cali6vnla Big,Hnrn �hccp (A rare sV,ens:l E. Domrt Slender Selanunder (An emlan Gercd :Penci) 10n0.t:L L-14 lle%ert kt,w,m. NOR.TII 0 1 2 Mlles 3 WILSEY & H:1�I' 4<.$2.b j , The Desert Slender Salamander (Batrachoseos aridus)is con- sidered a Federal and State endangered species. This sala- mander, first discovered in 1369, is known to exist only in Hidden Palm Canyon, a tributary of Deep Canyon, about 10 miles south of Highway Ill. The habitat is on private proper- ty, however, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management has been requested to consider acquiring the quarter -section where this animal occurs. Remainder of this section is 1 owned by the Bureau of Land Management. There are three species of animals which, while not listed in the California Fish and Game De oar tment's reports on endangered and rare fish and wildlife,l can nevertheless be considered unique to the Palm Desert area. The rarest animal in the category is the Coachella Valley Fringed -Toed Lizard (Uma inornata) which exists only in certain sand dune regions of the western Coachella Valley, it is now threatened with extinction as its habitat is rapidly being destroyed by man. Another reptile, the Flattailed Horned Lizard has been reported in sand dune areas and kit foxes are sometimes seen on the Valley floor. Both of these animals are quite rare in the Coachella Valley. j The topography and geomorphology (surface characteris-tics of the earth) were a significant consideration for three reasons: (1) the aesthetically pleasing contrast between the Valley and the mountains; (2) the sand dune environment, a rare and unique feature in deserts; (31 the severe development limitations in the mountainous areas resulting from steep slopes (see maps of non - seismic hazards in Element 6.2, Public Safety). Natural hazards include consideration of areas affected by both seismic and other hazards which could be of potential danger to the public. These include flooding and blowsand. (See maps of non -seismic hazards in Element 6.2, Public Safety, and seismic response zones in Element 6.4, Seismic Safety.) 2. Cultural Factors Special attention .ras given to existiny and proposed public and private facilities (i.e., parks, desert corridors and golf courses) which appear in the Land At the Crrssr�)ads, January 1972. 6.4.B.3 Use and Public Facilities Elements. Bicycle, hiking, and equestrian trails were also reviewed to determine how they should tie into the proposed open space system. Areas currently committed to, open space have been recognized as integral to the open space system. These consist of the 14,000 acre Philip L. Boyd Deep 'I Canyon Research Center, the 360-acre Living Desert Reserve, and the Big Horn Sheep Refuge which encom- passes most of the mountain zone. Archaeologic materials which are likely to be jeopardized by increased development are a significant concern. The Archaeological Research Unit, Dry Lands Research Institute of the University of California, Riverside, conducted a literature search and identified two areas of major archaeologic importance. Their summary stated that, "...the high archaeological sensitivity of this portion of the Coachella Valley cannot be over- emphasized. The sites in the vicinity of Indian Wells and Point Happy are significant in terms of the materials that could be recovered and their ramifications for reconstructing past subsis- tence technologies, as well as the sites' geo- graphical situation on the edge of the Valley. The latter is an important consideration in the analvsis of settlement patterns in this area of the desert." Date Palm agricultural areas are rapidly disappearing in the wake of urban expansion. They provide an attractive unique character to the urban planning area. The natural and cultural factors were compiled on one map which identifies those areas most appropriate for open space and con- servation (Figure 6,4-3). They correspond to areas proposed for open space and conservation in the Land Use Element. 6.4.B.4 j Si r-•�y L,,, -cd i :l f i I :i ti 2- �.. SS •��UUI 1 I FA FIGURE 6.4-3 CONSERVATION & OPENSPACE ' City Park �D County Park ...... WindbreJA �r Dr,iioa1_t' Clunt,t'I De,ert Corridors .50 Sand Dune Prea'ryc Hilkide & Wildl.fe Noe, e SA salan.."Id'r Pravcr.0 111111f n[I1111.11 �i.t' wnL ipeovl Dorn m.we tM1Ju.:rr Sthool PA... bv.rn U.dicd ]tM1unl U�.n¢; -v.6 �tlft' A,r a ]nrClJl ln•,tlincnl nl Suceuvt:v: x ;mdc.vun w+... nn - IbEe PJhn 1'r,11W NORTH .F�+-%7 0 1 2 Pmes 3 R'ILSEY & HAA1 6.4.B.4.a IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES The City shall SUPPORT THE CONTINUED MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE LIVING DESERT RESERVE AS A WILDLIFE PRESERVE AND MUSEUM OF THE DESERTS NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT. SUPPORT THE CONTINUED MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PHILIP L. BOYD DEEP CANYON RESEARCH CENTER AS A WILDLIFE PRESERVE AND NATURAL LABORATORY. SUPPORT THE MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE BIG HORN SHEEP REFUGE MANAGED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE, AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPART14ENT OF FISH AND GAME AS AN ENCLO- SURE TO BETTER UNDERSTAND' THE ENVIRONMENTAL NEEDS OF THIS RARE SPECIES. SUPPORT THE PRESERVATION OF THE DESERT SLENDER SALAMANDER, AN ENDANGERED SPECIES. DESIGNATE.THE SAND DUNE PARK SHOWN IN THE LAND USE ELEMENT AS A WILDLIFE AND NATURAL PRESERVE, AND ESTABLISH THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA FOR THIS AREA: -- NO DEVELOPMENT WILL BE ALLOWED EXCEPT FOR NON -INTENSIVE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SUCH AS HIKING TRAILS AND PICNICKING AREAS. -- THE AREA SHOULD BE USED FOR EDUCATION PURPOSES WHICH DEAL WITH THE UNIQUE SAND DUNE GEOMORPHOLOGY, FLORA AND FAUNA. DEVELOP NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY PARKS AS WELL AS EQUESTRIAN/ BICYCLE/HIKING TRAILS ACCORDING TO THE STANDARDS AUTHORIZED IN ELEMENT 7 - PUBLIC FACILITIES.. RETAIN THE ARCHAEOLOGIC SITES AT INDIAN WELLS, POINT HAPPY, AND III ANY AREAS WHERE POTENTIAL ARCHAEOLOGIC RESOURCES MAY EXIST. CONSIDER THE PROTECTION OF THESE RESOURCES WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS LIKELY TO OCCUR. AS EITHER TEMPORARY OR PER- MANENT OPEN SPACE. -- THE DETERMINATION OF WHETHER A SITE, OR PORTION OF A SITE, IS TO BE PERMANENTLY PRESERVED AS OPEN SPACE SHOULD BE BASED ON EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY A PROFESSIONAL ARCHAEOLOGIST. THIS EVIDENCE SHOULD BE COMPILED FROM A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION OF THE SITE IN QUESTION. 6.4.P.1 �i. T7_�`�!ri�i ,- •4.�.An;.Rq.-,fir STUDY THE PRESERVATION OF ALL EXISTING DATE PALM GROVES DESIGNATED IN THE LAND USE ELEMENT AS BOTH AGRICULTURAL RESERVES, AND/DR COMMUNITY PARKS. THE FEASIBILITY OF DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SELECT GROVES SHOULD ALSO BE CONSIDERED, AS LONG AS PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT MAINTAINS THE CHARACTER OF THE GROVES. DEVELOP A "DESERT CORRIDOR" SYSTEM (SEE FIGURE 6.4-3) UNDER THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: ' -- DESIGN CORRIDORS AT SELECTED ENTRY POINTS (SEE FIGURE 2.1, URBAN DESIGN ABSTRACT) TO PROVIDE "DESERT IMAGE" FOR CITY AND TO ESTABLISH LINES BETWEEN MAJOR PARKS - INCLUDING THE SAND DUNES. -- SPECIFIC DESIGN FACTORS ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY FUTURE STUDY. -- THE AESTHETIC QUALITIES OF DESERTTOPOGRAPHY AND FLORA ARE TO BE PRIMARY CONCERNS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CORRIDOR SYSTEM. 2 -- CORRIDORS SHOULD BE WIDE ENOUGH TO MAINTAIN NATIVE DESERT FLORA. i 6.4. 2 } 7. Public Facilities Element City of Palm Desert General Plan 7 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT INTRODUCTION Public facilities form a vital part of a city's quality of life for both individuals and groups. A society's basic needs for health, education, welfare, safety, and recreation are met in large part by the community's public facilities. The types of such facilities, their relationship to one another, and appropriate patterns of location are a response to the desires and needs of the people they serve as well as a reflection of the technological and organi- zation resources available. For the most part, public facilities, as a service to be provided to the residents, follow rather than lead development. Since the City is highly involved in the location and timing of development it must also concern itself with the provision of services for these develop- ments even though many of these services are not provided by the City itself.. Thus, in developing a general plan for a community it is important that public facilities be developed in a manner which both fulfill the needs and desires of the residents and responds to the pace and j location of residential development according to the city's financial I resources and funding policies. In this context, the Public Facilities Element suggests standards and policies for various public facilities. Note that Waste Management and Recreation Elements are included as subsections of this element. tri E� F; V GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Goal PROVIDE A FULL RANGE OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES THAT ARE RELATED TO CITIZEN NEEDS, ARE ECONOMICAL, AND ARE CONVENIENT. Objectives COORDINATE THE PLANNING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND UTILITIES WITH ALL SPECIAL DISTRICTS TO ENSURE THAT DUPLICATION IS AVOIDED SO THAT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH CAN BE ADEQUATELY SERVED. ENCOURAGE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION ON A CONTINUING BASIS AS A MEANS OF IDENTIFYING PUBLIC FACILITY NEEDS AND STANDARDS FOR FACILITIES. DEVELOP STANDARDS FOR THE PROVISION OF PARKS AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES. AS THE CITY DEVELOPS, CREATE AN APPROPRIATE BALANCE BETWEEN CITY - PROVIDED AND CONTRACT SERVICES. ENSURE THAT PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT OVERLOAD EXISTING PUBLIC FACILITIES OR CREATE THE NEED FOR PREMATURE UNPLANNED INVESTMENTS IN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CITY AND DISTRICTS SERVICING THE CITY. DISTRIBUTE FACILITIES AND SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE CITY TO PROVIDE CONVENIENT ACCESS. ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE COMMUNITY FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE BEFORE PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT IS APPROVED SO TO ENSURE THAT FACILITIES ARE NOT OVERLOADED AND AREAS ARE NOT LEFT UNSERVED. 7.G. 1 BACKGROUND Parks Developed recreational areas within Palm Desert are presently at a minimum. With the exceptions of the Living Desert Reserve, the facilities provided at the local schools, and the City Park on Painter's -Path, no public recreational facilities exist within the City. Libraries The Palm Desert Library, constructed in 1962, is a branch of the Riverside Public Library/Riverside County Free Library system. The library contains a book collection of approximately 20,000 volumes and provides, in addition to its regular book lending services, 'regularly scheduled programs, films, circulatingphonograph records, photocopy service, and school visits. Hospitals Health facilities within the region are numerous with the Eisenhower Medical Center and Palm Springs Hospital providing the most extensive service at the local level-. r - Water Water is supplied to Palm Desert by the Coachella Valley County Water District (CVCWD) and. Palm Desert Community Service District from its various wells scattered throughout the area. The District has started a recharge program utilizing water obtained from the Metro- - poIitan Water District which is released into the Whitewater 'ChanneI and allowed to percolate into -the soil and thus add to the water table. Major additions to the Palm Desert water system during recent years have included construction of the million gallon Sandpiper Reservoir at Salt Cedar and Desert Lily, a one million gallon reservoir in the Thunderbird Country Club, together with a 2.5 million gallon reservoir to be constructed nearby in December.1975, and 2.5 mil -lion gallon reservoir on. Alamo south of Homestead with an accompanying major pumping facil'i:ty. - Sewage System The CVCWD also has responsibility for waste water treatment within the Palm Desert area. While a large portion of the area continues to util- ize "septic tanks, a system of treatment plants and their collector Sys- tems is being developed. At present, the Palm Desert Country Club treatment plant is the only district -wined plant in operation. A new activated sludge treatment plant is nearing completion north of Cook Street above the stormwater channel. Regional wastewater collection lines have been installed to serve the City. This plant has an i 7.8.1 initial capacity of 2.5 million gallons per day with an ultimate capacity of 20 mgd. This plant is expected to serve the urbanized area between Indian Wells and Cathedral City. T Schools Public schools in Palm Desert are under the jurisdiction of the Desert Sands Unified School District. Three schools are presently operating within the City; Washington (grades K-2); Lincoln (grades 3-5); and the Palm Desert Middle School (grades 6-8). High school students attend school in Indio. A high school site.has been selected at the northwest corner of Cook Street and Avenue 44 but construction is not anticipated for at least another five years. Solid Waste Disposal > The Palm Desert Disposal Service provides solid waste pick-up service in the Palm Desert area for both residential and commercial users. Solid waste is transported to the land fill site five miles southeast of Desert Hot Springs which is operated by Riverside County. No new sites are anticipated as being necessary for the expected population growth of the area although the company does desire to set up a transfer station in the Palm Desert area to reduce transportation costs. Cultural Center The College of the Desert has begun a program to develop a cultural center which will hopefully lead to a center for the performing arts. The center, which is presently estimated to be a 6.5 million dollar project, will have, as its first phase, the construction of a 2,500 seat auditorium with services for performing groups. The second phase will concentrate on both music and the visual arts. Police Protection Police protection is provided by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff's Department provides response service to requests For service and investigatory services in criminal cases. The initial agreement between the City and the Sheriff's Depart- ment for law enforcement services was to start with the minimum level of service that was provided to the area prior to incorpora- tion by the Sheriff's Department and the California Highway Patrol. This is the present staffing pattern. The Sheriff's Department has the caoability of providing, through contract, any level of law enforcement desired by the City. - 7.B.2 31 .. r 3 A contract for law enforcement services can be written for any level desired by the City which would provide for proper con- trols by both parties. Constant review of the service is an admin- istrative function which is accomplished. The results of the review r is the subject,of discussion with the City and the basis for action of upgrading. A number of private developments additionally provide internal security services for their residents. Problems Lack of adequate facilities for civic and cultural.activities. Need area for.group meetings, theatrical productions, etc. Lack of space for governmental services. Need for adequate local parks. Need to reduce transportation costs of solid waste disposal. a .. Opportunities Potential for recreational activities at Living Desert preserve and a sand dunes park. Great latitude in the location of public facility sites, and the possibilities for achieving optimum locations. Public services may be utilized not only to provide convenient and efficient service but also a framework for developing the City's "image". Public Facilities Concepts The major focus within the Public Facilities Element is to develop a well integrated system of public services throughout the City. Rather than attempt to develop a single centered system, the emphasis is, whenever feasible, on',a localized program through a multi -centered approach. The intent is to bring the services to the people instead of requiring the people to go to the services. As cities grow at the rapid pace that Palm Desert has, there is a frequent concern on the part of the residents that the pending "bigness" of the community will no longer allow them ready and easy access to their public servants. The policies within this element'address this concern. Inherent as well within the concept of Public Facilities in Palm Desert is the development of a program of public services that wiII be economi- cal and at the same time reflect the service needs and desires of the City's residents. Figure 7-1 indicates a variety of public Facilities which may be either publicly or privately provided within the City as well as provide a reference for facilities which could be con- sidered within the design of the individual neighborhoods in Palm Desert. 7.s.3 j A j ff vauc •.utrr. timPuos a.uo• .•«.... m •wuo.e .,.rtly. i ri •Illf l•'Ill.!'. I rIIIIII II. G.fli 1, f �'o Jim i .' i �' .1� �I iiI�1IIIIIIII ail f aal L jJ E.Y j Ij �I .1I h l�ltill I rll .I'! II l ILLII III 1. I I'' r�71�llllrllrl'. .I I.II �i r17 FIGURE 7-1 COMPREHENSIVE PUBLIC FACILITIES GUIDELINES Source: Adapted From blassaehusettS Institute of Technology INNOVATIONS IN NEW COMMUNFTIES, SLIT Press, Carnhridge, 1973. 7. B.3. a r , a IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES GENERAL ELEMENT POLICIES The City shall: PROVIDE FOR POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF REGION SERVING COUNTY, STATE AND FEDERAL FACILITIES ADJACENT TO PALM DESERT CIVIC CENTER. WORK CLOSELY WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT TO ENCOURAGE THE JOINT USE OF FACILITIES AS NEIGHBORHOOD PUBLIC SERVICE CENTERS FOR INFOR- MATION, RECREATION AND CULTURAL ACTIVITIES. ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT OF JOINT FACILITIES FOR POLICE AND FIRE SERVICE WHERE ACTIVITIES CAN OCCUR ON A NONINTERFERING BASIS. WORK WITH OTHER, PUBLIC AGENCIES AND LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT TO DEVELOP MULTIFUNCTIONAL PUBLI.C,)ISERVICE CENTERS IN KEY LOCATIONS J THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY. PERIODICALLY SURVEY RESIDENTS TO DETERMINE PERCEIVED LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO IDENTIFY SHORT- COMINGS. AWARD CONTRACTS TO PUBLIC AGENCIES OR PRIVATE CONTRACTORS IN ORDER TO REDUCE COSTS AND ENCOURAGE INNOVATION IN PROVISION OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES. 'CONTRACT WITH OTHER ENTITIES., PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, WHEN APPROPRIATE, FOR THE PROVISION OF VARIOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES WHEN THE SERVICES PROVIDED ARE MORE ECONOMICAL OR SUPERIOR QUALITY, MORE AVAILABLE OR ACCESSIBLE, OR WILL GENERALLY SERVE THE NEEDS OF ALL OR PORTIONS OF PALM DESERT. REQUIRE THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OTHER CITY PLANS AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS; PROVIDE FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE NECESSARY SERVICES TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF THAT DEVELOPMENT. ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT IS NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY PLANS WILL ADDI- TIONALLY PROVIDE FOR THE NECESSARY MODIFICATION OF SERVICES TO ACCOMMODATE THAT UNPLANNED NEED. NOT ALLO'W'DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT ENSURING THAT COMMUNITY FACILITIES SUCH AS SCHOOLS, POLICE PROTECTION, RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, WILL BE AVAIL- ABLE FOR THAT DEVELOPMENT AT A LEVEL REQUIRED FOR THAT DEVELOPMENT. RECREATION ELEMENT POLICIES UTILIZE THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS III GUIDING PARK AND RECREATION' PLANNING: -- THE TERM "NEIGHBORHOOD PARK" SHALL MEAN ANY AREA OF LAND SET ASIDE AND IMPROVED SPECIFICALLY AS A HIGH ACTIVITY AREA, THE PRIMARY USE BEING FOR CHILDREN FIVE AND OVER WITHIN IMMEDIATE WALKING DISTANCE OF RELATED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. r i .r -- THE TERM "SMALL PLAY AREA" SHALL MEAN ANY AREA OF LAND THAT HAS BEEN SET ASIDE FOR RECREATIONAL USE, SPECIFICALLY FOR PRE -TEEN CHILDREN. -- THE TERM "REST AREA" SHALL MEAN ANY AREA OF LAND THAT HAS ,. BEEN SPECIFICALLY SET ASIDE AND IMPROVED TO PROVIDE REST AND RELAXATION TO PEDESTRIAN OR NON MOTOR, TRAFFIC. REST AREAS CONSIST OF PERMANENT FACILITIES IN HARMONY WITH THEIR CONTIGUOUS ENVIRONMENT. -- THE TERM "DESERTBELT!' SHALL MEAN ANY CONTIGUOUS AREA OF LAND THAT HAS BEEN SPECIFICALLY SET ASIDE AND IMPROVED TO PROVIDE FOR PEDESTRIAN AND NON -VEHICULAR PATHS AND TRAILS OR AS PASSIVE LANDSCAPED SPACE. fr -- THE'TERM "COMMUNITY RECREATION PARK" IS AN AREA SERVING A COMMUNITY AND PROVIDING OUTDOOR AND INDOOR FACILITIES TO MEET A MUCH WIDER RANGE OF RECREATION INTERESTS THAN THE =+j NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION PARK'AND IS PRIMARILY AN AREA FOR YOUNG-PEDPLE AND ADULTS: -- THE TERM "REGIONAL PARK" SHALL MEAN ANY LARGE OPEN SPACE AREA WHICH MAKES PROVISION FOR RECREATIONAL AND LESISURE TIME ACTIVITIES FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY I AS WELL AS THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY.OF PALM DESERT, REQUIRE DEVELOPER DEDICATION OF PARK SPACE OR FEE IN LIEU AT THE RATE OF 4.5 ACRES PER 1,000 POPULATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS. r' (SEE FIGURE 7-2 1. PURCHASE ADDITIONAL ACREAGES AT THE RATE OF 2.0 ACRES PER 1,000 POPULATION FOR COMMUNITY PARKS. (SEE FIGURE 7-2) ALLOW FLEXIBILITY WITHIN THE HEREIN MENTIONED STANDARDS TO. REFLECT THE VARYING NEEDS OF DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS WHEN DETERMINING PARK ACREAGE AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH NEIGHBORHOOD. UTILIZE THE FOLLOWING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR NEIGHBOR- HOOD RECREATIONAL PARKS: -- LAND DEDICATED FOR NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION PARK PURPOSES MAY BE DEDICATED TO A COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION FOR PRIVATE MAINTEN- ANCE OR TO THE CITY FOR PUBLIC MAINTENANCE, AT THE OPTION OF THE CITY. WHEN SAID NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS ARE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINFAI,NED, STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ,PUBLIC NEIGH- BORHOOD PARKS SHALL BE APPLICABLE TO PRIVATE OWNED AND MAINTAINED NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS. DETERMINATION AS TO THE QUALITY OF `IAINTEN.`NCE cNP.I' oc ruE c--0r"c• ''ri nc THE DIRECTOR, OF. ENVIRONMENT SERVICES. 7.P.2 FIGURE 7 - 2 PARK NEEDS NEIGHBORHOOD WITHIN COMMUNITY PARK NEIGHBORHOOD PARK CITY LIMITS ACREAGE ACREAGE 1 6.4 14.3 2 3.2 7.3 3 3.9 8.7 4 6.7 15.1 5 2.9 6.6 6 2.6 5.9 7 12.2 27.5 8 -- 11 2.9 6.6 WITHIN SPHERE OF INFLUENCE 7 -- 8 4.5 10.1 9 10.0 22.5 10 10.4 23.3 11 18.8 42.3 12 15.6 35.2 13 9.7 21.9 14 7.8 17.4 15 -- -- 16 3.3 7.5 17 7.5 16.9 V 18 19 8.4 9.6 18.9 21.6 20 1.4 3.2 21 1.8 4.0 22 4.0 9.1 23 1.8 4.0 24 2.7 6.0 25 1.5 3.4 Total: 159.6 359.3 NOTE: The park needs are developed on the basis of projected populations and may be revised as a result of development of neighborhood specific plans. 7.P.2.a -- ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND FACILITIES SHALL BE MADE AND CONSTRUCTED BY THE DEVELOPER, OR WHEN A FEE IS PAID IN LIEU OF DEDICATION, 37 BE SUFFICIENT TO MEET AND PROVIDE THE SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS. -- ENTIRE PARK AREAS SHALL BE GRADED AND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL INCLUDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE, LAWN, SHRUBS,, TREES, AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, CONCRETE WALKWAYS AND WALKWAY LIGHTS. -- FURTHER, THE DETAILED LANDSCAPE AND EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATION EMPLOYED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCORPORATED. -- NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SHALL BE LOCATED CENTRALLY TO THE RESID- ENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SERVED-. -- WHEN CENTRALIZATION CAN BE ACHIEVED, -NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS ;r SHOULD ADJOIN AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OR SCHOOL SITE. SUCH' PARKS SHALL BE A LOGICAL EXTENSION OF THE SCHOOL GROUND. -- MINIMUM SIZE OF EACH NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SHALL BE SIX (6) ACRES AND NOT EXCEED TWELVE (12)•ACRES, EXCLUDING TOT LOTS AND DESERTBELTS'. -- SERVICE AREA OF NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SHALL BE ONE QUARTER TO ONE HALF MILE; IN NO CASE SHALL THE FARTHEST DWELLING UNIT SERVED BE A GREATER DISTANCE THAN THREE QUARTERS OF .A MILE. -- ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE AUTHORIZED BY THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ACCORDING TO THESE ADOPTED CRITERIA. MINIMUM IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD INCLUDE BUT NOT NECESSARILY BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: --- ENTIRE AREA SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED CHARACTER OF THE AREA AND SHALL 'INCLUDE GRADING, LANDSCAPING AND PROVISIONS FOR ADEQUATE DRAINAGE __- FOOT PATHS SHALL BE OF CONDITIONED LOCAL MATERIALS - ONE TWO -ACRE SITE WHICH SHALL BE PLANTED AND MAIN- TAINED AS A GRASSY AREA --- TWO OF THE FOLLOWING: CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA IN ADDITION TO TOT LOTS SWIMMING POOL (AT THE RATE OF 1/2 SQ. FT, PER PERSON FOR AREA SERVED) TENNIS COURTS (AT THE RATE OF 1 FOR EACH 2O00 PERSONS) BASEBALL/SOFTBALL, FOOTBALL AREA (AT THE RATE OF I BASEBALL DIAMOND PER 6000 PEOPLE; 1 SOFTBALL DIAMOND FOR EACH 6000 PEOPLE; 1 FOOTBALL/SOCCER FIELD FOR EACH 1500 PEOPLE) °AS�ETBALL!'.'OLLE`(5A1_' --- WHEN A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SERVES A PREDOMINANTLY RETIRE- MENT COMMUNITY, A MULTI PURPOSE COMMUNITY CENTER 7.P.3 BUILDING MAY BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF THE RECREATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED IN THE ABOVE ITEM. -- IN PRIVATELY OWNED NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, PUBLIC ACCESS SHALL BE LIMITED TO GREENBELTS, PATHS AND TRAILS, AND ACCESS RESTRICTED TO HOMEOWNERS AND THEIR GUESTS. UNDER AGREEMENT WITH THE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO CLUBHOUSES, CHANGJNG ROOMS, POOLS, TENNIS COURTS, ,BASKETBALL AND VOLLEYBALL COURTS AND OPEN PLAYFIELD ACTIVITIES MAY BE USED BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC. -- WHEN DEVELOPMENT IS IMPENDING AND FEES WILL BE PAID IN LIEU OF DEDICATION, THE CITY SHALL, WHENEVER POSSIBLE, OBTAIN FIXED PRICE OPTIONS TO ACQUIRE THE LAND TO BE DEVELOPED AS A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK. SAID OPTIONS SHALL.BE EXERCISED WHEN FEES ARE COL- LECTED. WHEN SUCH OPTIONS ARE HELD BY THE CITY; THE FEES IN LIEU OF DEDICATION MAY BE DETERMINED BY A PRORATED SHARE OF THE TOTAL OPTION PRICE. -- ADEQUATE PARKING FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED. UTILIZE. THE FOLLOWING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COM- MUNITY PARKS. -- SERVICE AREAS OF COMMUNITY PARKS SHALL BE ONE HALF TO THREE MILES OR A MAXIMUM OF FOUR SQUARE MILES WITHIN THE CITY. -- WHENEVER POSSIBLE, COMMUNITY PARKS SHALL BE ORIENTED TOWARDS SERVING THE NEEDS OF ONE OR MORE NEIGHBORHOODS. -- COMMUNITY PARKS SHALL PROVIDE SUCH'FACILITIES AS, BUT NOT i LIMITED TO, COMPETITION SIZE SWIMMING POOLS, TENNIS COURTS, j FIELD ORIENTED ACTIVITIES SUCH AS BASEBALL, FOOTBALL, SOCCER AND OTHER COMPARABLE ACTIVE SPORTS. -- SUCH PARKS MAY INCLUDE SPECIAL PURPOSE AREAS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ECOLOGICAL PRESERVES, MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSES, PICNIC AREAS AND GARDENS, PROVIDING THAT THE PARK. AND RECREATIONAL NEEDS AT THE COMMUNITY LEVEL, IN THE EVALUATION OF DIRECTOR. OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, HAVE BEEN MET. -- COMMUNITY PARKS SHALL PROVIDE A RECREATION CEtITER, THE FACILITIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MULTI PURPOSE CLASS AND ASSEMBLY ROOMS, FOOD PREPARATION FACILITIES, GENERAL STORAGE SPACES, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE SPACES. REST ROOMS" { T P.4 I AND CHANGE FACILITIES AND/OR GYMNASIUM. -- ADEQUATE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED. ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOT LOTS WITHIN NEIGHBORHOODS ACCORD,ING TO THE FOLLOWING GENERAL STANDARDS: -- ONE MULTI PURPOSE PLAN STRUCTURE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN EACH TOT LOT, -- TOT LOTS ARE TO BE INTEGRATED INTO DESERTBELTS OR NEIGHBOR- HOOD PARKS. -- WHEN TOT -.LOTS ARE LOCATED NEXT TO A PUBLIC STREET, A FENCE WITH VERTICAL MEMBERS NOT MORE THAN TWELVE INCHES APART SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED. -- PLAY AREAS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DRAINED SAND AND/OR GRASS. ALL SAND AREAS SHALL BE AT '-EAST 18 INCHES DEEP. -- PLAY AREAS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY LANDSCAPED TO PROVIDE SHADE AND RELIEF FROM THE SUN, AND BE IN THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THIS SECTION. -- A WATERING SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED TO WET THE SAND AND PLANTINGS. -- A MINIMUM OF TWO BENCHES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND PLACED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO FACILIATE.SUPERVISION OF PLAY WITHIN THE TOT LOT SITE. ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF REST AREAS WITHIN NEIGHBORHOODS ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING GENERAL STANDARDS: -- MINIMUM SIZE OF EACH AREA SHALL BE ONE QUARTER ACRE. -- REST AREAS ARE TO BE LOCATED AT THREE QUARTER MILE INTERVALS + ACCESSIBLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. -- IMPROVEMENTS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: BENCHES AT LEAST TWO IN NUMBER --- LANDSCAPING, CONGRUENT WITH THE SPIRIT AND INTENT --- OF THIS SECTION WATER FOUNTAIN FACILITIES SHADE PRODUCING FACILITIES OR LANDSCAPING r ! 7.P.5 1 A;t f REQUIRE THE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TO MEET ALL CODE REGULATIONS REGARDING WATER PRESSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR DOMESTIC USE AND FIRE PROTECTION. DRAINAGE SYSTEM DEVELOP A DRAINAGE SYSTEM PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE BY UPDATING AND IMPROVING ON THE "REPORT ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE FOR THE PALM DESERT AREA" PREPARED IN 1968. REQUIRE NEW DEVELOPMENTS TO HANDLE DRAINAGE PROBLEMS WITHIN THEIR OWN 'PROPERTY. POLICE PROTECTION ESTABLISH LOCAL REPRESENTATION OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN THE CITY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ATTEMPT TO IMPROVE AND PURSUE THOSE ACTIONS WHICH WOULD LEAD TO GREATER COOPERATION AND UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE LOCAL CITIZENRY AND THE .PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL OF THE CITY. I I A CULTURAL AND CIVIC FACILITIES ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A REGIONALLY ORIENTED CULTURAL CENTER, I.N COOPERATION WITH THE COLLEGE OF THE DESERT. CONTINUE WORK TOWARDS THE DEVELOPMENT OF .A CIVIC CENTER, IN PALM DESERT WHICH WILL SERVE RECREATIONAL, CULTURAL AND GOVERNMENTAL SERVICE NEEDS. , SCHOOLS tr CONTINUE TO COORDINATE NEIGHBORHOOD AND DISTRICT PLANNING WITH THE DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SO THAT SCHOOL SITES MAY BE RESERVED AT APPROPRIATE' LOCATIONS IN PHASE WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT. LIBRARIES 11 PROVIDE LIBRARY SPACE AT THE RATE OF ONE SQUARE FOOT PER 5 RESIDENTS BY MEANS OF EITHER A COUNTY OR CITY LIBRARY SYSTEM. SE14AGE SYSTEM ESTABLISH A CALENDAR FOR CONVERTING.EACH AREA FROM SEPTIC TANKS TO A SEWER SYSTEM. REQUIRE ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE SEWER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS TO STREET. ALLOW NEW DEVELOPMENTS ONLY WHERE SEWAGE SYSTEM IS AVAILABLE. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTINUE, TO MONITOR THE FEASIBILITY OF PROVIDING SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS AS A CITY SERVICE. COORDINATE THE LOCATION FOR LANDFILL OPERATIONS WITH THE COUNTY TO EXCLUDE THOSE AREAS WHICH WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO EITHER DEVELOPED OR OPEN SPACE AREAS. DEVELOP DETAILED IMPLEMENTATION STUDIES REGARDING THE NEED, TIMING, AND LOCATIONAL CRITERIA FOR TRANSFER STATIONS WITHIN THE PLANNING AREA. WATER ALLOW NEW DEVELOPMENT ONLY WHEN SUFFICIENT WATER IS AVAILABLE TO MEET DOMESTIC USE AS WELL AS FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS. 7.P.6 0 8 IMPLEMENTATION ELEMENT INTRODUCTION The General Plan provides both a Physical and policy framework for the development of the City of Palm Desert. Each element of the plan re- commends a series of action policies that should guide the City's de- lopme6t decisions. These Policies are based on two major assumptions including; 1. The assumption, that certain aspects of the existing development -pattern should either be strengthened or changed to create a development pattern consistent with the stated goals and objectives. 2. The assumption that the City must exercise certain options regardi•no public and private development within the unde- veloped portions of.the City and Sphere to move toward achievement of stated goals and objectives. The purpose of the Implementation Element is to provide a context for the necessary planning and programming that must take place to achieve the action policies. More importantly the Implementation Element indicates the interrelationships required between the various implementation pro- grams and the General Plan. E1 BACKGROUND General Plan/Program Relationshi Figure 8-1 illustrates the basic relationships between'the General Plan and key short term implementation -tools. It should be noted that the relationship illustrated in the diagram is cyclical. This is due to the difference in the tine frame and level of detail between the eneral lan and its implementation programs. The General Plan is a long range plan (time frame 2020) and the implemen- tation programs are short term programs with specific objectives. Studies conducted for short term programs may suggest modifications to the General Plan which may in turn suggest adjustments within the implementation programs and short term programs with specific objectives. 'The key relationships in the diagram include: 1. The relationship between the General Plan, capital budgets, and operating budgets. 2. The relationship of the General Plan to specific plans. 3. The relationship between the 'General Plan, specific plans; the capital improvements program, zoning, and subdivision regulations. Major Plan Pr000sals Requiring Action The major proposals included in the Plan that will require public action include: 1. Public facilities development. 2. Modifications to the circulation network. 3. Open space conservation and park development. 4. Strengthening the Core Area. 5. Development of a land use regulation system. 6. Development of an overall community housing program. Alternative Courses of Action There are a series of alternative programs that must be analyzed and ultimately carried out to implement the action policies recom- mended in the General Plan Elements and summarized above. These include: 1. Detailed System Plans for specific program elements including parks, open space, circulation and public facilities. 8.8.1 GENERALPLAN GOALS OBIECTIVES ACTION POLICIES STANDARDS GENERAL SYSTEM PLANS LONG-RANGE PHASING POTENTIAL IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES & PROGRAMS IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS. _sy =PL4,'4-S DETAI ZONING; SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES REDEVEL. OPMIENT SPECIFIC PLANS FIGURE 8.1 GENERAL PLAN / IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM RELATIONSHIP WILSEY & HAM 8.B.l.a 2. Specific Area Plans for selected portions of the City. 3. Capital Improvement (Investment) Programs, for the extension of the -circulation net:iork and other public facilities. 4. Redevelopment in selected areas such as the Core Area. 5• Assessment Districts for various types of public - improvements. 6. Land Development Regulations. 7. Timing and phasing procedures for land development to ensure that private development is coordinated with major public investments. Each of these elements and the required areas for action are identified below. System Plans The General Plan provides a framework for each of the major physical systems within the City and Sphere. Detailed system plans are required to respond to the more fine grain aspects of these public systems. System plans should be developed for. The highway network. The network of Nature Preserves The park -system. The bike path/golf cart path network. The hiking and equestrian trail network. The streetscape and street landscaping network including the desert corridors, Specific Area Plans Specific area plans illustrate how the principals of the General Plan may be realized at the development and site planning scale. Specific Plans should be developed for; The area surrounding the College of the Desert. The northern blowsand/sand dune areas. FW-W I The southern hill and mountain areas. Each.of the City's neighborhoods. jCapital Improvement Programs The Capital Improvement Program is a short term statement of public development policy. It outlines the City's investment strategy in relation to the 'physical components of the General Plan, and places fiscal priorities on the recommended General Plan programs. The Capital Improvement Program for Palm Desert should include: A summary of projects complete. A summary of proposed projects. A financial analysis of thel'program including funding sources for program recommendations and the capabilities of the City to fund the various programs. A year by year description of the projects and their resul- tant financial requirements. A summary of progress toward realization of General plan Objectives. Community Development/Redevelopment a Selected areas of Palm Desert exhibit problems that currently have a negative influence on the area's development to its full potential. Problems that may limit the development of an area include items such as parcelization, circulation and flooding. Redevelopment Programs represent a potential tool for solution of these negative factors in locations such as the Core .Area. Assessment Districts Assessment Districts formed by the City provide an opportunity to add a variety of public improvements in selected areas. The various types of improvement districts available are discussed in the Interim Core Area Plan. Land Develcpment Regulations The most common legal mechanism for the regulation of land use include zoning and subdivision controls. In the case of both types of regulations the purpose must be to provide standards for development of private land that is consistent with the General Plan. rM Timina and Development Phasing As Palm Desert begins to accept a large share of the Coachella Valley population growth, it will be essential to relate antici- pated development to the ability of all impacted governmental agencies.to provide essential services and facilities. The relationship established must provide a method to relate devel- opment that occurs or is proposed to public investment programs without creating premature or unplanned public expenditures. Potentials for phasing General Plan development include: Creating, a logical pattern for the extension of major public facilities.. Creating a compact urban form that discourages premature development of'outlying areas. Tying Programs to Action This section of the Implementation Element illustrates a program for matching the major Plan recommendations to potentially available implementation techniques. In short, it combines the sections of this Element concerning "Pro- posals Requiring Action" and "Alternative Courses of Action." In addition to combining programs and -actions, the matrix included in Figure 8-2 indicates a framework for funding the proposed actions. Thus, the matrix represents the framework for.City implementation programs, consisting of a pattern of recommended public programs and expenditures based on the physical expression of major Plan objectives. C I ilJ ilJ 8.B.4 eC08 T — — cIn I T p _ I I � I I I I I�r I. I NIIU to n;unity i I �r �c ll'1 I'ru � I.�..' f S;ate ki otniey Froaralns Cy'I Gas Tar 1V.'e Cj Assess cent Distcts ri I {I01 G str � District e:r Ef Non -Federal keeevelopmen[ I I IC4 I �E.3 I I I C), I e Ca ital Ir provenen is roars, FF�;.I'il j I Iii �gCJ y I iI'l I Subdivision Subdivision i ec� I I Dedications .G Extractions o.I cd I I !q I I (� I 2anina keaulations ! I j County Aid for Arterial Hiah•rays I' CVAG Programs DDT - Transit C. Loans G Grants E' City Parking W. Authority IC'JI 1 I F1'I C! G.D. bonding I I Revenue Bonds 1 I loin[ Powers Acreemen is with other Public Corporations _ LAFCD Maier Property Dwners L Developers City building. I Inspection e •�s .�.J. # 1"� `tip"-r _"1 J IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Environmental impact is not limited to the effects on plants and g animals but includes the effects that the General Plan may have on j a wide range of physical, biological, economic and social issues. The General Plan considers the effect of various development alter- natives on the physical and social environment during the Plan's formation stages. Because of this the following sections will deal with secondary effects only and be of a generalized nature. Only those impacts which the General Plan itself does not detail 1 are elaborated on in the following analysis. A. Natural Environment 1. Topography The implementation of the General Plan will necessarily after the topography. Development of golf courses, grading for structures, etc. will chance existing land contours. This is not seen as detrimental, as most of the existing topography in proposed development areas is of little intrinsic value to man. Provisions have been made in the General Plan to preserve the two significant topographic portions of the project area; i.e., the sand dunes and mountain areas, 2. Seismic and Non -Seismic Geology The probability of a severe earthquake being experienced in the planning area is not high but the possibility always exists. All that can be done is to minimize seismic hazard through development controls in earthquake zones; e.g., zoning ordinances and building code regulations. ' Background data necessary for the evaluation of various strategies with which to minimize seismic hazards is provided in the Seismic Element 6.4. The same basic type of information required in seismic safety evaluations is needed for other types of geologic =+ hazards. Data on non -seismic hazards is presented in the t Public Safety Element, 6.2. This includes identification of blowsand, severe slope, and flood hazard areas. Wind erosion is one of the major problems in areas wh re future development is proposed. Doubly rows'of tamarisk .trees should aid in abating the problem once they are full grown. Ho:fever, during development stages and until the 33 E.7 tamarisks take hold, sand storms and extensive sand accumulation on roads can be expected to occur. The chances for sandblow are highest once vegetation has been removed during construction projects. Riverside County Ordinance 484.1 or future ordinances developed by the City will have to,be adhered to in order to minimize the hazard. 3. Vegetation and Wildlife Detailed descriptions of the vegetation and various wildlife habitats are presented in Element 6,5. Provisions in the .General plan protect all rare and endangered ,.species in the planning area, as well as provide suitable environ- ments for more common flora and fauna, types. As development of the Valley floor takes place, most of the native plant and 'animYV"habitats<wiII be destroyed. However, some species including most rodents and birds can be expected to increase their existing population as a result of landscaping. Severe topographic conditions coupled with existing wildlife -reserves will prevent development in mountain areas. Flora and fauna will be preserved in its native state in these areas, 4. Open Space As vacant land continues to be developed, its use as open space is obviated. Retention of desired open space necessitates action prior to the development of the Land for other uses. The Open Space and Conservation Element 6.4 in conjunction with the other components of the Environmental Element 6 outlines various reasons ..ihy specific areas should be preserved as open space. 5. Air Quality The issue of air quality is a major concern throughout the'n'ati'on'and particularly in the Southern California region. While it is .possible to determine the amounts and types of pollutants by source type, their effect on overall air quality is difficult to measure„ Such a determination would involve a regional air pollution study, a task beyond the scope of -this report. Figure 9-2 shows the projected tons ,per day of various air pollutants for mobile sources. The analysis is broken E.8 11 C IX. IRREVERSIBLE OR IRRETRIEVABLE EPIVIRONMEHTAL CHANGES It is generally considered that urbanization of t",,ose portions of the planning area designated For urban er.oansion is an irreversible environmental change. The acquisition, development, and/or maintenance of parks and. ooen space areas along with provisions of adequate levels of public services will help to minimize adverse changes. They will also provide the opportunity for offsetting social benefits, c.19 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONTACTED DURING PREPARATION OF THE E.I.R. Living Desert Museum, Ms. Karen Fowler Deep Canyon Research Center University of California, Riverside, Mr. Pat Barker Bureau of Land Management Coachella Valley Water District, Mr, Warner Norried Coachella Valley Association of Governments Southern Pacific Railroad CALTRANS, Mr, Don Weaver i i Riverside County Fire Marshall Desert Sand Unified School District, Mr, Harlow Riverside County Air Pollution Control District U. S. Department of -Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Mr. Norman Elam j City of Palm Desert, Mr. Paul Williams Riverside County Planning Department i City of Palm Springs, Mr, Richard Service College of the Desert, Dr. F. D. Stout Desert communiolY News1 1-ttllz,vsUestw Stitt SaaMaml Offiu. 74.617 Migh,.ar 111 a 346 5616 Palm 0.60" Nan% Valley ONiaaa 61 1 5o0h Na C-n,-� Dl-, a 325 8666 Palm sprimys In ISr By SHARI FINCH Staff Writer PALM DESERT — A dune is an eternally moving mass of land. It is difficult to own or claim responsibility for. Forty acres of such sand. valued last year at S15.000 by the Riverside County assessor's office, are now part of a 1.046.67-acre package under consider- ation for annexation to the city of Palm Desert. The flag -shaped land parcel, located between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street along two sides. and Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Wash along the others, may some day be bordered with lush private estates and condominiums. It could also become a haven for the children of owners or renters of apart. ments and modestiv-priced houses. Now designated for single-family dwellings, the entire northern section will be subject to zoning changes upon the forthcoming annexation, according to the county planning department. In the midst of a controversy stand the dunes. ,Not being what some could call "a piece of the rock," dunes behave like children who think every house is home. With no pretentios claims to snobbery, they enter regardless of the structure's "But without a continuous link with the origin of sand, the dunes become stabilized and compacted unless some.: one maintains their loose character," he said. The feeling is that preserving the dunes for any further amount of time would be beneficial, he said. There is some possibility of a court decision required to protect the natural habitat, although its existence is al. ready bleak. There is also a proposal for the federal government to purchase a section of existing dunes for a protect-, ed park. "I don't want to be called four-letter names by people who are mad at me and my sand." said the dunes' owner, F.Y. McDonald of Long Beach, at a recent Planning Commission public hearing. Opinions also have been sought from Property owners and local developers before the decision on hove to best zone the area for community compatibility. McDonald told the commission that the dunes are undergoing change. Desert sage has grnwn over many of the rolling hills often used by an inf creasing number of dune buggies, he said. His message was simple: stop people from upsetting the delicate balance of nature_ or eet rid of the dun,,. one m ,rod -C 1:00 P.`.l, - r'ITY 11.1,!. [Y('IL I. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Palm Desert. Planning Curanission was called to order by Chairman Berkey at 1:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Ball. II. PLEDGE - Commissioner Kelly III. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioner KELLY Commissioner KRYDER Commissioner SNYDER Chairman BERKEY Others Present: Paul A. Williams - Director of Environmental Services Ralph Cipriani - Associate Planner Clyde Beebe - Director of Public Works Kathy Shorey - Planning Secretary IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES of the regular meeting of May 2, 1978 of the Planning Commission. On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the minutes were approved as written; carried unanimously (4-0). V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Berkey explained the Public Hearing procedures to those present. A. Case No. C/Z 01-78 - INITIATED BY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION Request for approval of a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for pre -zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.A.), O.S. (U.A.), PR-3 (U.A.), PR-10 U.A.) or any other zone deemed appro- priate on property generally located between COuntry .lnuteS Palm Desert Plarnin ^:i:;Sion `lay 17, 1978 Commissioner Roliy asked how accurate the summary of hror,:=Fu students in the area wa,. Sir. ;;illiams noted that 70" t!i, would probably be morn accurate. Commissioner Rryder noted that Sir. [Iirsch's reason, for un average zoning of 11-1-7300 sq. ft. are valid reasons and should be considered. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing and asked if,. there was anyone wishing to speak on the matter. F. X. MCDONALD, Long Beach, owner of 40 acres on the southwest, southwest corner of Section 9, told - fhe Commission of his conversation with the various neighbors in the area of his sand dunes and how they and he were in favor of the Open Space desig- nation being changed. He also noted that the sand - dunes are bein;- destroyed by 4 things: the sage brush, dune buggies, adjacent developments, and the City protecting them. Sir. McDonald stated that the whole area should be reserved as a sand dune preserve or none of it. SIR. RAFF, owner of 3.95 acres, a homestead parcel located on Monterey and Hovely Lane, asked to have it clarified how the proposed zoning would affect the small land owner such as himself. Sir. Williams stated that as the pre -zoning was being done as a single project, individual property owners would be exempt from the minimum site area required to obtain a Change of Zone to the P-R zone. As a result, in- dividual property owners would be able to develop under the PR zone no matter what acreage they owned once the pre -zoning is approved for the entire area. He further stated that this zoning designation would limit the area to condos and residential homes. Chair- man Berkey noted that the staff would then be the co- ordinator for all the property in the area. Mr. Raff stated that he must dedicate land for road use. Mr. Williams noted that since Hovely Lane already exists that there should be no problem. RICHARD ARNOLD, 73-722 Santa Rosa, an adjacent developer told of his experiences in other areas with sand dunes, and he noted that adjacent development would stop the sand dunes from being sand dunes as it takes sand to make sand dunes. EUNICE PIERSON, representing Mr. Hirsch, noted that Mr. Hirsch would appreciate further consideration of his request for 8,000 sq. ft. average per lot. SID HANDY, Aster Drive, 18 year resident, spoke in op- position toa open space in the middle of the City. r I1 n..tes Pal- Desert Pla nai;:_: , 11_: 17. 1973 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Gent. ) A. Case No. C/Z OI-78 (Cunt.) GEORGE MARZICOLA, President of Country Club I'ronerty Owners Association, noted he is enerally in agreement with the proposed zoning and annexation. He stated that the extension of streets and the improv(-ments of others should be taken into consideration ,ith a bridge considered on Cook Street. Further he noted that the :association is opposed to annexations because of the Excise Tax involved. RICHARD GUELICH, Santa Cruz, noted the extensive work that the Staff had put-ifhto the report on the pre - zoning and he noted his concern for the ability of the City to maintain the open space. Chairman Berkey stated that he felt the case should be continued for further review. Commissioner Kelly stated that more input is needed on the utilities in the area and the maintenance of the sand dunes. Commissioner Kryder indicated more information was needed on the traffic situation. Commissioner Snyder asked that Staff be able to answer the questions regarding maintenance of the open space and alternatives to an open space zoning designation. On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission continued Case C/Z 01-78 to June 14, 1978 for further review and study; carried unanimously (4-0). B. Case Nos. DP 03-78 and 80C - ]ICBAIL COMPANY, Applicant Mr. Williams noted that these cases and Case No. TT 11791 should be continued to June 14, 1978 also due to the action of the Commission on the pre -zoning. MIKE GALLAGHER, representing the applicant, noted his agreement with the continuance. C. Case No. TT 11791, continued as noted above. D. Case No. CUP 07-76 - HENRY TAGLE, Applicant Request for approval of an extension of time for an approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the construc- tion of a restaurant with Variances from parking re- quirements and setback requirements on property located at the northwest corner of Palm Desert Drive and San Carlos Avenue. Mr. Williams reviewed the case and noted that the Commission had approved a previous extension of one year. w Minu tes Palm Desert Planning Cu-missi-in June 11. 1078 of P V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Cunt.) On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Ca missiuu r Kryder, the minutes wero approved as corrected: carried unanimously VI. WRITTEN C01111UNICATIONS Mr. Williams noted that the letter that the Commission had received in their packet from IIope Lutheran Church dealt with their appealing to the City Council regarding one condition of ap- proval with regard to the curbs and gutters. Commissioner Snvdet• asked that it be emphasized that curbs and gutters are a standard requirement not a special condition. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Berkey explained the Public Hearing procedures to those present. A. Continued Case No. C/Z 01-78, INITIATED BY'PAL,I DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION Request for approval of a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for pre -zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2).(U.A.), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.S.), O.S. (U.A.), PR-3 (U.A.), PR-10 (U.A.) or any other zone deemed ap- propriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Channel and between Mon- terey Road and Cook Street. Mr. Williams reviewed the Staff Report and briefly discussed the proposed Sand Dune Park and the various alternatives determined by the Staff. He noted that the Staff suggested that the park be reduced by 30 acres on the west side and design the park in a wind direction that will preserve the park. He then suggested that the area deleted be zoned PR-5 if the Commission chose this alternative. Mr. Williams noted that a major General Plan Amendment would be needed if the O.S. designation were dropped entirely. Further, it was pointed out that the school district indicates that there will be a need for another elementary school site in the area south of Country Club and east of Cook Street, due to the growth in the area in question and in La Quinta. Mr. Williams noted letters received regarding blowsand, and the open space. In conclusion, Mr. Williams stated that the Staff recommended approval and that the changes should be made on the map attached to the Resolution. Chairman Berkey asked for further justification with regard to the R-2 8,000 rather than R-1 10,000 zone. Mr. Williams noted that staff felt with the buffer between the residential and commercial and the layout of the tract that the R-2 8,000 would be appropriate. Minutes Palm Desert Plannin5 Corinission June 14, 1978 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) A. Continued Case No. C/Z 01-78 (Cont.) Pale Three Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearings open and asked if the applicant wished to speak at this time. MIKE GALLAGHER, representing McBail Co., addressed the Commission, noting that the plan is consistent with the General Plan: the lots will average over 9,000 sq. ft.; 1.88 acre recreation site will be provided; the plan comes close to a planned unit development; and, he believes the density is appropriate and doesn't know if it will set a precedent. Chairman Berkey asked if there was anyone wishing to sneak in FAVOR or in OPPOSITION to the proposed project. RICHARD ROSIER, representing Ted Weiner, property owner, stated that Air. Weiner is satisfied with the proposed pre -zoning and that if the Commission decides not to act today and pre -zone the entire area, that Sir. Weiner would like to break off his parcel and have the Commission pre -zone his separately so that he can get on with developing it. F. X. MCDONALD, property owner, stated that the death of the Sand Dunes is inevitable; he objects to the O.S. designation: and, he requested a PR-7 zoning on his property due to its small size; he wants the same density as Portola Country Club. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing closed and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. Commissioner Fleshman and Commissioner Kryder asked about the shape of the 30 acres that might be zoned O.S. and if the wind direction would replenish the sand dunes. Sir. Williams noted that it would and noted the shape on the exhibited map. Commissioner Snvder asked about the shape being a triangle across Sir. McDonald's property and how long would the wind patterns prevail as they are? Air. Williams stated that he is speaking about a 5-10 year period and that Staff believes the proposal would be appropriate as suggested by Commissioner Fleshman and Chairman Berkey. Commissioner Kelly stated her opposition to the R-2 8,000 zoning and noted her concern with the traffic in the area. Some discussion followed regarding the zoning and that there would be 141 units permitted under PR-5. Chairman Berkey reopened the Public Hearing and asked if the applicant would like to address the various issues discussed. Mr. Gallagher stated that the density would increase under the PR-5 and tha 1--- ..___ CITY OF PALM DESERT SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report On: Change of Zone Applicant: PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED Case No.: C/Z O1-78 Date: June 14, 1978 I. INTRODUCTION: This matter was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of May 17, to allow additional information regarding concerns that the Planning Commission had in specific areas. These areas dealt with questions re- garding the property to be zoned open space and .'nssible impact upon schools. This report will attempt to provide responses to these concerns. II. CONTENTS: A. Staff Recommendation. B. Draft Resolution No. C. Review of alternatives regarding open space area. D. Discussion of school impacts. E. Appendix - 1. Recent correspondence received. 2. Portions of General Plan regarding the Sand Dune Park concept. 3. Newspaper article regarding Sand Dune Preservation 4. Background from..previous Staff Report on the subject matter.. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By Planning Commission Resolution No. recommend approval to the City Council of a Change of Zone from 'S' to P.C.(2)(U.A.), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.), R-1-12,000 (U.A.), PR-5(U.A.), PR-4(U.A.), and O.S.(U.A.) for the property under consideration. Justification is based upon: The revised recommendation does conform to the Palm Desert General Plan to a greater degree than the initial recommendation. 2. The revised recommendation is more compatible to existing and proposed PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING AP- PROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR A PLANNING COMMIS- SION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FROM 'S' TO PC(2), R-2 8,000(8), R-1-12,000, PR-4, PR-5, AND O.S., UPON ANNEXATION ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS CITY ANNEXA- TION NO. 5. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert. California, did hold a duly noticed Public Hearing on the 17th day of May, 1978, and a continued Public Hearing on the 14th day of June, 1978, to consider a Planning Cmanission initiated prezoning from 'S' (Study) to P.C.(2)(U.A.) (Planned Cmrmercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.) (Single-family residential, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexa- tion), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S. (U.A.) (Open Space,'Upon Annexation), PR-3(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 3 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-10(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 10 du/acre, Upon Annexation) or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the White - water Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street, and more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary land of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common I Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 east, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a dis- tance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 8W 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 890 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Por- tola Avenue and Country Club Drive. THENCE continuing north 89` 42' 00" east along the northerly line of said Section 9, a distance of 5,307.00 feet to a point. Said point being the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Cook Street and said Country Club Drive. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page Two THENCE south 000 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 000 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 890 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 8e 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 890 45, 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 000 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 890 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, said application has met the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure Resolution No. 78-32," in that an expanded initial study was developed for the project; and on this basis a negative declaration was issued and the appeal period has expired; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and argument did find the following facts and reasons to exist to revise its initial proposal to as shown on the attached Exhibit labeled Exhibit A: 1. The revised recommendation does conform to the Palm Desert General Plan to a greater degree than the initial recommendation. 2. The revised recommendation is more compatible to exist- ing and proposed zones in the area. 3. The revised recommendation provides increased mitigation measures considered appropriate after review of an ex- panded initial study conducted on the project. 4. The revised recommendation would better meet the objec- tives of the Palm Desert adopted General Plan. 5. The application of Planned Zones on a majority of the subject property provides the City the vehicle by which to control development in terms of timing; mitigation measures related to blowsand and protection of unique animals and landforms; and, compatibility of development to City Standards. 6. The area being considered for prezoning is considered a logical expansion of the Community, and the recommended zoning designations are considered compatible to the existing development in the Community. TTnw TVT;DTVnD/; DV TT DVOnTIMn s. +a,, n1.,...4__ 0,...,----4-- _. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page Three PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, held on the 14th day of June, 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks Case "Io. C/Z 01-73 May 17, 1978 III. CONTENTS OF REPORT: A. Background B. Discussion C. Draft Resolution D. Related Exhibits I. Major circulation Page Two 2. Adjacent Zoning 3. Letter from Mr. H. Hirsch 4. Initial Study including comments from responsible agencies. 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 340 initiating Prezoning Procedures. IV. BACKGROUND: A. Size: 1046.67 acres B. General Plan Land Use Designations: 5-15 acre District Commercial 5-7 acre Institutional 1037-1045 gross acre medium density residential, 5-7 du/acre C. Adjacent Zoning: See Exhibit 2 attached D. Average Residential Density Recommended: 4.48 du per gross acre V. DISCUSSION: A. Introduction: On February 28, 1978, the Planning Commission, by Resolution No. 340, did initiate prezoning proceedings on the subject property. Since then, the Staff has been reviewing the environmental impacts of the various alternative zoning designations for the subject property. Please note the attached expanded initial study. In addition there has been corres- pondence with several property owners in said area. The property in question contains approximately 1,050 acres and con- sists of various sized parcels, ranging from as small as 5 acres in size along Hovely Lane to as large as 170 acres at the Whitewater Chan- nel and Portola Avenue (extended). The area is generally vacant except for an existing residence on Hovely Lane. Existing access to the area is provided from Monterey Avenue, Cook Street, and Country Club Drive. B. General Plan Designation: Case 'Io. C/Z 01-78 May 17, 1978 Page Three V. DISCUSSION: (Cont.) General Plan Designation: (Cont.) The residential land area of approximately 925 acres would have a maximum potential dwelling unit range of 4,395 to 6,153 under the General Plan Land Use designation of medium density residential. However, the Staff believes that this range will be reduced on the basis of: Mitigation of moderate blowsand condition in the area. Potential development pattern in the area because of large ownerships. 3. Mitigation of possible environmental affects. Therefore, the recommended zoning designations would provide a maximum density of approximately 4,175 dwelling units or 4.48 d.u. per acre. VI. ANALYSIS OF RECOMMENDED ZONE DESIGNATIONS: Introduction• Since the initiation of the prezoning procedures, the proposed zoning designations have been refined in two specific areas. First, is the corner of Country Club Drive and Cook Street which Staff had tentatively designated as potentially PC(2) and PR-10; on the basis of a potential development plan for all the property in the north half of the section between Portola and Cook Street. However, this potential development did not come about. Therefore, it is recommended that the total area be designated as PR-4. This would not preclude a future consideration of a total development plan on this area, and some revision of the Zone Designations in this area. Secondly, the approximate 170 acre parcel at the northwest corner of the Whitewater Channel and Portola Avenue (extended) is being recom- mended for a PR-5 designation, instead of the previous recommendation of PR-4. This recommendation is based upon compatibility to adjacent zoning to the north, west and east. Please note attached Exhibit 2 for adjacent zoning. Review of Recommended Designations: The recommended Zoning districts proposed for the subject property can be broken down into four general classifications which will be discussed below. The final recommendation is less dense than allowed under the land use designations in the General Plan. This reduction is the result of serious review of the environmental concerns for the area, as shown. in the attached, expanded initial study. The following reflects the projected impacts of the recommended zone districts: (see next page) L SUMMARY TABLE OF RECOMMENDED ZONING 0 DWELLING UNIT AND POPULATION DENSITIES a v Proposed Permitted Approximate Gross Number of Estimated Dwelling Unit Populati Density _ Zone Use Acreage Units Permitted Populationa Density DU/Acre Persons/ PC (2) Planned Commercial District 9 N/A b N/A b N/Ab N/A� O.S. Open Space 110 N/Ab N/Ab N/Ab N/At R-2 8,000(8) Residential 28 152 365 5.4 13.0 R-1(12,000) Residential 60 218 523 3.6 8.7 PR-5 Residential 425 2125 5100 5.0 12.0 PR-4 Residential 420 1680 4032 4.0 7.2 Total 1052 4175 10,020d 4.48d 10.76 a Based on 1976 h Special Census data of 2.4 persons per dwelling unit. Not applicable. dBased on 1976 Based Special Census data of .4 school age children (5-19 yrs.) per dwelling unit. upon a residential acreage of 931 acres. Case NO. C/Z 01-78 May 17, 1978 Page Five VI. ANALYSIS OF RECOMMENDED ZONE DESIGNATIONS: (Cont.) B. Review of Recommended Designations: (Cont.) The proposed residential designations consist of two categories - Planned Residential and Single-family. The Planned Residential, which is the largest classification proposed (91: of residential area) is broken almost equally into two density classifications 4 and 5 units to the acre. The single family designation is also broken into two categories - 12,000 sq. ft. lot min. and 8,000 sq. ft. lot min. The smaller lot designation is recommended adjacent to the proposed commercial center. The Commission will be consider- ing a Development Plan for this area which indicates how this re- sidential area will relate to the proposed Commercial development. Staff believes that the proposed 8,000 sq. ft. lot development will act as an excellent and unique buffer for the proposed com- mercial center. This approach is preferred to the more traditional procedure of using apartments as the buffering element. The Staff cannot, therefore, support the points made by the Rancho Mirage Planning Commission in their letter on this matter, which is a part of the Development Plan report. The second proposed single-family designation of 12,000 sq. ft. lot min. is proposed for the southwest corner of the intersection of Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue (extended). This parcel is considered desirable for such a designation on the basis of: good access, suitable size, and view potential. Therefore, Staff cannot support the request of Mr. Hirsch in his letter attached hereto as Exhibit 3, for a substantially greater density. Further, Mr. Hirsch's request is for a zoning designation of R-1-7,500 sq. ft. (average), is less than the minimum of 8,000 sq. ft. allowed under the City's Zoning Ordinance, Therefore, there is no way that the Commission can consider Mr. Hirsch's request. Circulation Pattern: Exhibit 1, attached hereto, describes the proposed major circulation elements for the subject property. Said system provides for the ex- tension of Portola Avenue northerly to Country Club Drive and the widening of Cook Street, Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. Said plan also provides for the extension of Hovely Lane to Cook Street on the basis of an 88 ft. right-of-way. In addition, a new street connection, mid -block between Portola Avenue and Monterey Avenue, is proposed to connect Hovely Lane to Country Club Drive_ Staff envisions the area developing west to east, which is exemplified by the fact that the only development plans filed for the area is ad- jacent to Monterey Avenue. Because of the large parcels east of Por- tola Avenue (extended), an additional north -south connection between Hovely Lane and Country Club Drive is envisioned, but is not shown at this time. Further, special consideration will have to be given to this road extension in relation to the existing industrial zoning south of the subject property, so that none of the industrial related traffic is directed through the residential area to the north. Finally, hpraucp of the Iaanc er�ti; aL_ .-__J -..- _ _ .. Case No. C/Z 01-78 May 17, 1978 Page Six VI. ANALYSIS OF RECOMMENDED ZONE DESIGNATIONS: (Cont.) D. Environmental Analysis: (cont.) of the level of the projects being considered. The project being considered by the City includes annexation, prezoning, and consid- eration of specific development on 3.7% of the total area. The City's General Plan Environmental Impact Report Analysis was on the basis of a worst possible case which in the area under consideration would include a 15 acre commercial center and a seven unit to the acre residential development or approximately 6,153 units. The recommended zoning designations substantially reduces the limits of this analysis to a 9.3 (62%) acre commercial center and a maximum of 4.43 units per acre or a maximum of 4,175 (69%) du. Given the necessary blowsand measures and development standards of the City, it is projected conservatively that a maximum of 2,756 du or 45% of the projected development under the General Plan EIR analysis will result in the area under consideration. This finding is exemplified by the McBail residential development which under the requested zoning could result in a maximum of 152 dwelling units. Whereas, the actual develop- ment proposed is 101 dwelling units or 67% permitted under the zoning and 46% of the density considered under the General Plan EIR. There- fore, in terms of magnitude, the potential development in the subject area will be less than previously considered under the City's General Plan EIR. The State in an effort to streamline the Environmental procees, effective January 1, 1978, implemented several revisions to the Guidelines. One procedure implemented was the development of the Initial Study procedure. Said procedure requires initial contact prior to a determination on a project with responsible agencies to get their input. Further, it allows the lead agency (Palm Desert) to identify environmental impacts and to modify the project to mitigate those impacts. In addition, the new guidelines allow reliance on previous EIR's so that further environ- mental analysis would focus on the potentially significant environmental effects. Procedurally this approach is almost as detailed as develop- ing an EIR and requires a similar amount of Staff time. Based upon the above described procedure, the original project has been significantly reduced to allow mitigation of the major adverse affects of blowsand, unique landforms and animal life. Finally, these new pro- cedures allow the City to analyze each subsequent actual development from an environmental standpoint in order to provide further mitigation measures and to wrestle with the major issue of direct impacts at a level which is meaningful, versus making unsubstantial predictions which cannot be qualified at this level of analysis. Case No. C/Z 01-78 June 14, 1978 IV. REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES REGARDING OPEN SPACE: At the May 17, Planning Commission meeting a great deal of discussion revolved around the matter of the property shown as open space. This dealt with the area known as the Sand Dune Park. A great deal of testi- mony was given as to concern for maintenance of that area in a natural state and its resulting impact upon downwind properties. Said input dealt particularly with a 40 acre portion of the area immediately adjacent to Portola Avenue and northerly of the former Sun King Mobile Home Park. This issue of the Sand Dune Park can be best understood if everyone is aware of the parameters related to such facility. The Draft Parks and Recreation Element defines the proposed Sand Dune Park as a 150 acre parcel. This is a modification of the total size, as expressed in the City's adopted General Plan which indicates a much larger acreage. This reduction was based upon the recent review by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission. Ninety acres of this facility is located in the proposed annexation area and is proposed to be pre -zoned open space as a part of this application. A majority of said property is presently zoned W-2 under the County or controlled development area. While a majority of and the best sand dunes are located within this 150 acre area there are additional dunes located in the general area. In a recent blowsand study done by the Coachella Valley Area of Governments Agency, this property is located within the one cubic yard transport con- tour area, which means that approximately one cubic yard of sand is moved in the wind direction per year. The property in question is considered a unique desert land form and is designated in the General Plan as the habi- tat for an endangered species, the Fringe Toed Lizard. To adequately analyze the importance expressed by the General Plan -egarding the Sand Dune Park, please find in the Appendix of this report all General Plan references dealing with the Sand Dune Park. The alternatives related to the open space designation in this change of zone application are as follows: First, an open space designation does re- quire the City to acquire the property at its market value at some point in the future. The ninety acres which is included in this application could be acquired through a combination of funding programs by the City; with up to 50% being funded through the State under their Land and Water Conservation Fund Program which provides for just over six million dollars for Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. The purpose of this grant program is to acquire areas of natural significance. In the Staff discussion with the State it appears that sufficient monies will be available to -utilize this funding pro- gram for this acquisition. However, the local share for acquisition of ninety acres of land may not be feasible for the City, unless some of the area was donted as a gift to the City. Therefore, the ultimate size of the park would have to be based to some degree upon the City's ability to fund its acquisition. The second alternative would be to remove the open space designation and place an appropriate developmental zone on the property. Before this could be ac- complished, it would require a modification of the Parks and Recreation Ele- ment wich is being considered at this meeting by the Planning Commission. Further, other General Plan Amendments would be necessary. If this alternative were selected, the Staff would suggest that this pre -zoning matter be divided at Portola and no consideration on any of the property be made easterly of Portola until the appropriate decision regarding the General Plan Amendment could be pursued. Support for this approach exists in the attached letter from the attorney for Mr. Ted Weiner, an owner of property westerly of Portola A.......... A "4-A ... ..... 11A k_ a_ i1_ _.— _t __._1_ ____ — Case No. C/Z 01-78 June 14, 1978 IV. REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES REGARDING OPEN SPACE: (Cont.) If one were to review the attached segments of the General Plan and the proposed Master Plan of Parks and Recreation, one would find that some portion of the proposed Sand Dune Park would have to be developed for recreational purposes to meet the estimated recreational needs of the Community. Therefore, the name Sand Dune Park may be a misnomer and the Commission should perhaps consider the designation of open space to imply a public park. Pursuant to the Parks and Recreation Element, the actual development or non -development of a portion or all of said park would de- pend upon subsequent detailed survey and analysis of the recreational needs of the Community and the environmental impacts of subsequent development of said area. Therefore, on the basis of the General Plan and the Draft Parks and Recreation Element, the Staff would suggest that no alternative be considered that would result in total elimination of the Sand Dune Park. It is believed that this is a viable, environmentally sensitive area that includes a unique land form that needs to be preserved and cannot be simply eliminated. Assuming that the park lands were acquired, regardless of its configuration, there would be related maintenance cost. Initially the cost of installation of blowsand protection on the south and east would be needed. Its cost would not be substantial since the actual installation would be supplemental to blowsand improvements that would be installed as a part of development. Subsequent improvements to said area would have related maintenance costs which should be analyzed at that time and cannot be determined at this point. In weighing all the alternatives regarding this matter, the Staff would recommend that the size of the O.S. area be reduced to 60 acres or the total park area be limited to 120 acres. The recommended alternative is shown on the following graphic. J IV too P.R.-3 ( U.A.) PROPOSED MLM DESERT CITY LIMIT W W NQI� L. O _jO.S. S.I., S.P. o J-; PALM DESERT IFY LIMIT o WON SECT, ILl�.i�. c CORIAN 1 1 —'__--_ --- —COUNTY Of RIVERSIDE a 0 V Case No. C/Z 01-78 June 14, 1978 IV. REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES REGARDING OPEN SPACE: (Cont.) This recommendation is based upon the following: It is questionable that the City would be financially capable of acquiring a total of 90 acres for park purposes. The MacDonald 40 acres would be particularly expensive since it means acquiring the total parcel. Whereas, the rest of the park area is portions of much larger property, some of which could be acquired as a part of development through the City's Community Facilities requirement of the Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed reduction would maintain the appropriate wind orienta- tion to extend the life of the sand dunes. Development along Portola would buffer the park from excessive access by motorized vehicles and would better intigrate the park into the neighborhood. It is recommended that the area taken out of the O.S. designation be placed in the PR-4 zone district. SCHOOL IMPACTS: Based upon the concerns expressed by the Commission at the May 17, meeting we have reviewed the school impacts of said pre -zoning with the representa- tives of the school district. They indicate that previous history of condo- minium development in the Community would indicate to them that each condo- minium constructed would provide a maximum of a half a child per unit, or the maximum of 1670 kids as provided in the previous report. Based upon po- tential construction activity in this area and the construction activity in the Palm Desert Country Club area, officials of the school district feel that a school would have to be provided near Country Club Drive. However, they feel that it should be located easterly of Cook Street to be more centrally located to the areas generating children. The Staff has been in contact with the owners of the property at the southeast corner of the intersection of Cook Street and Country Club Drive, and it appears feasible to obtain a school site for the district approximately one half mile to a mile easterly of Cook Street. The district officials feel confident that this facility would meet the needs for the area under consideration. When taken in conjunction with the existing school facilities of the district. The actual class composition of this new school would be flexible and be dependent on the capacity of other facilities, new and existing, in the Cove area. r� e=W111X1T 'g' Desert Communit Y NewsA Yalle.scTDesert Sun Saalh.a.r WIN:" North Vail•r OHi... 74-617 Highway I I 1 • 3,16 5646 611 South Palm Canyon D—e • 325 0666 Palm De.en ►aim Springs Palm Desert Studies Parcel For Annexing By SHARI FINCH Staff Writer PALM DESERT — A dune is an eternally moving mass of land. It is difficult to own or claim responsibility for_ Forty acres of such sand, valued last year at $17,000 by the Riverside County assessor's office, are now part of a 1,046.67-acre package under consider- ation for annexation to the city of Palm Desert. The flag -shaped land parcel, located between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street along two sides, and Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Wash along the others, may some day be bordered with lush private estates and condominiums. It could also become a haven for the children of owners or renters of apart- ments and modestly -priced houses. Now designated for single-family dwellings, the entire northern section will be subject to zoning changes upon the forthcoming annexation, according to the county planning department. In the midst of a controversy stand the dunes. Not being what some could call "a piece of the rock," dunes behave like children who think every house is home. With no pretentios claims to snobbery, they enter regardless of the structure's —1— "But without a continuouslink with the origin of sand, the dunes becoine stabilized and compacted unless some- one maintains their loose character," he said. The feeling is that preserving the dunes for any further amount of time would be beneficial, he said. There is some possibility of a court decision required to protect the natural habitat, although its existence is al- ready bleak. There is also a proposal for the federal government to purchase a section of existing dunes for a protect.. ed park. "I don't want to be called four-letter names by people who are mad at me and my sand," said the dunes' owner, - F.%. McDonald of Lung Beach, at a recent Planning Commission public hearing. Opinions also have been sought from property owners and local developers before the decision on how to best zone the area for community compatibility. McDonald told the commission that the dunes are undergoing change. Desert sage has grown over many of the rolling hills often used by an in- creasing number of dune buggies, he said. His message was simple: stop people from upsetting the delicate balance of nature, or get rid of the dunes once and Russ Johnston Associates Russ JOHNSTON Managing Director June 13, 1978 Palm Desert Planning Commission City of Palm Desert Gentlemen: I understand that you will be discussing on 6/14/78 future use of a small sand dune area north of the wash owned by F. X. McDonald. I would like to support the idea of a sand dune park to help preserve the desert character. In a recent survey of members, the Palm Desert Chamber of Commerce (of which I am not a member) discovered 97.3 percent of the respondents favored "retaining some land for scenic, historic, and recreational use." When asked "Who should do it" 7% said Federal, 8.4 State, 7.2 County, 16.9 City, and 60.3 felt a "combin- ation of forces" should do it. I am attaching a copy of a news story, dated 3/12/78, outlining activities of the Nature Conservancy, a private funding source. Perhaps they could be of help. I'm sure you are familiar with their work. I had planned to attend your meeting in person but a conflicting engagement prevents it. V ru yours, Russ hnston RJ/mj cc: Martin Bouman Mayor City Council members 73-266 Goldflower, Palm Desert, Ca. A Division of Ryton Enterprises— , - _ 1 A-14 Sunday, March 12, 1978 Press -Enterprise Group invests in conservation with large real estate purchases By JON HALVORSEN PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — For the past 25 years, a group of investors that includes some of America's richest families has been quietly buying real estate across the United States. By now, they have accumulated 1.2 million acres In 47 states. Land speculation? Development? Choice condo- minium sites? Hardly. The Investors represent the Nature Conservancy, and the real estate includes a back- water swamp in North Carolina that harbors the red -cockaded woodpecker; an arid chunk of New Mexico graced by tarantulas, scorpions and lizards. Not to mention the bit of Minnesota where Tynpan- uchus Cupido Pinnatus — otherwise known as the endangered greater prairie chicken — hangs out. IT'S TO INSURE the survival of these crea- tures and their environment that the Nature Con- servancy goes about its business. Among those who sit on its board are a Rockefeller and a duPont, two former governors, media executives, a botanist and a banker. And each of more than 140 corporations pay at least $1,000 a year for membership and contribute about 5 percent of the total budget. Despite the holdings and prominent supporters, the conservancy -keeps a low profile. There are no court fights against polluters or a dam or a high- way, only private negotiations with landowners. "We're the real estate arm of the conservation movement," says Patrick. F. Noonan, the group's president. "It's not that we try to hide ourselves or anything. We would prefer conflict avoidance. We find it a better way to operate in the free -enterprise system." The conservancy was incorporated in 1951 in Washington and is now based in Arlington, Va. It has 43,000 members and operates four regional offices, with volunteer chapters in 25 states. Its paid staff of 200 includes specialists in ecology, real estate, wildlife management and law. NOONAN, A 35-year-old real estate broker with master's degrees in business and land -use plan- ning, says 2 million acres are being developed each year. "Someone has to be equally aggressive on the other side of the fence," he says. The conservancy gives first priority to buying "areas that provide habitat for rare or endangered species or, that represent particularly fine exam- ples of a natural system." Above all, it prides itself on being able to move quickly to protect an area. For example, when a 1,364-acre area on Long Island's Napeague Bay was threatened by develop- ers, the conservancy borrowed $8 million from a bank and bought it. A few months later, the group sold the land to New York State for the same price and repaid the loan. The conservancy depends on individual and corporate membership dues, foundation grants and public contributions. Its $4.3 million Revolving Fund operates like a private bank. Money is loaned to local chapters to purchase land and repaid at low interest through Ideal fund raising. The conservan- cy also has unsecured lines of credit of $7 million each with two New York banks. BETWEEN ONE-THIRD and one-half of the ...�,........... I...IA:....� h...... 1....,.. n f. ;nht nifto A picturesque stand of trees symbolizes the goals of Nature Conservancy, an organiza- tion which has purchased over 1.2 million acres for conservation across the nation. Inc., to buy land off the Eastern Shore. The conser- vancy now owns 13 islands and nearly uninterrupt- ed control of 60 miles of coastline. The conservancy has retained ownership of about 60 percent of its preserves, appointing a volunteer land steward or committee to manage it. In the other cases, it has sold or donated land to government, a college or another conservation or- ganization. ITS LARGEST single project — the 220,000-acre Sevilleta de Is Joys preserve in New Mexico, purchased from a foundation for a fraction of its worth, was turned over to the U.S. Fish and Wild- life Service to be used as a wildlife refuge and research area. Those who give land often are motivated by a combination of self-interest and philanthropy. One contributor, Ingram Richardson of South Bristol, Maine, donated 77 acres of a wooded penin- Press -Enterprise Sunday, March 12, 1978 A43 onomers from around worlc�� Kitt Peak's top administrators spent a month in China. "We're not like a military industry making offensive weapons," said Dave Moore, the observa- tory's spokesman. "Everything we have is open to all to see." SOME 79,00 visitors took advantage of the invitation last year. The standout attractions on the mountain are the Mayall and McMath telescopes. The Mayall, which took 13 years to design and build at a cost of $10 million, is housed in a 20-story structure painted white to reflect the hot rays of the sun. This four -meter reflector can record images at the outer fringes of the known universe 10 billion light years away. (A light year is the distance light travels in one year at 186,000 miles per second.) "One hour of viewing with such an instrument is.equivalent to an entire night's work with the larger telescopes of an earlier generation," said Moore. THE MAMMOTH Mayall is a stellar telescope used by astronomers to determine. the temperature, mass, distance, composition and velocity of stars. Every two to three years its aluminum -coated mirror has to be resurfaced because of oxidation. The resurfacing is done on the mountain. The 1.5-meter McMath solar telescope, the largest in the world, is focused on the sun. A 110- foot tower with a heliostat (tracking mirror) re- flects light down a 500-foot path with the last 300 feet being a shaft cored into the mountain. The result is a 30-inch image of the sun. The first laser ever beamed off the moon originated here. "The first group of astronauts put a one -meter reflector on the moon," said Underwood. "Scien- tists simply reversed the telescope process and shot a laser to the moon which returned to the earth 2.7 seconds later in California." "THERE ARE are two groups of astrono- mers," said staff astronomer Donald Hall. "Theo- reticians who think about and try to understand processes purely on the basis of mathematical tools. Then there's the fairly large group of astrono. mers who observe with existing instruments, define a problem and set out to solve it. "The sort of serendipity, dramatic discoveries are usually few and far between." Even in something this scientific there, is an element of chance. Mother Nature doesn't allow telescope viewing for about 50 days of the year. For those unlucky astronomers booked on those dates: "Tough! Tough!" said Underwood. "It's gone. Down the drain. They'll have to reapply." -It's a process that takes six to eight months. Most astronomers don't brave the cold working conditions. Instead they sit in heated control rooms within the domes — something akin to a television control room — and use 14 computers to keep their telescopes tracked on a star .and --record its -,light data. SPECTOGRAPHS ARE used to split up the star light into the colors of the spectrum thus allowing scientists. to determine chemical compositions. Most of the analytical work is done back at..the Tucson headquarters which has a staff of 300h ly trained scientists, engineers, administrators and support personnel. The three -level facility features one of the largest optical shops in the world capable of polish• ing a 180-inch mirror blank. Currently opticatengi- neers are spending six months turning a 15-ton sbiid piece of fuzed quartz into the world's next three. meter telescope for the Manua Kea Observatory.•in Hawaii. Day in and day out, the grinding takes constdnt supervision to make sure the polishing pad, held down by barbell -type weights, forms the ,gq}ct curvature of the mirror blank as It slowly turgapn a motor -driven wheel- It is a process whicli.J'C' quires constant testing and retesting in infig4s. imal fractions. AFTER THE grinding is completed, the mirror will be placed in a vacuum and coated with &'layer of aluminum three -millionths of an inch thick. Kitt Peak is operated by the Associatioh:;of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) under a $9 million contract with the Nationat'Sei- ence Foundation. AURA also operates the On" Tololo InterAmerican Observatory in Chile and:the Sacramento Peak Observatory in Sunspot, NtMG There are 13 universities with active astronomy programs making up AURA with each having1wo representatives on its policy -setting board. Various committees handle the task of review- ing proposed projects and determining which -ds- tronomers will be allowed to use the valuable telescope time, says AURA President Dr. John, M. Teem. Sixty percent of the telescope time is devot6d:to visiting astronomers selected on' the basis of the scientific merit of their project and not whetbpr they belong to the member institutions. The AURA member universities include Ari- zona, California, Chicago, Indiana, Michigan;, Ohio State, Texas at Austin, Wisconsin, Colorado, Yale, Princeton, Harvard and the California Institute of Technology. Currently being considered for mem- bership is the University of Hawaii. THER S A SO N C. REN 1. "ask abooWiewr4*ce toverage" LAW OFFICES KOEMEK AND HAMWI June 7, 1978 Paul A. Williams, A.I.P. Director of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Case No. C/Z 01-78 Dear Mr. Williams: DEL AMO FINANCIAL CENTER SUITE 1270 UNION BANK TOWER 21SS HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90503 (213) 370-4507 712-2050 FILE NO 1642 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT We represent Mr. Ted Weiner, the owner of a portion of the property which is the subject of the above case before the Planning Commission. We have been requested by Mr. Weiner to inform you that he has no objection to a change of the zone designation for the "F. X. McDonald property" from O.S. to such other designation as you and your staff deem appropriate. Mr. Weiner attended the hearing on May 17th, and listened carefully to the presentations in objection to the O.S. zone for Mr. McDonald's property and agreed with the majority of the comments made. Yours very truly, ROEMER� AND AMWII i. chard I. Roemer RIR/paf cc Mr. Ted Weiner Mr. F. X. McDonald a6,cep ,lam y4.� �seve ew,4,eo�l Y4�7 area. i%•se�� s X&14� eWe&-4d--'l ,&OL, 'O�lell Ate- Az Ya, 6. ���e %S i ✓l �i cl�'ljal� %, elm / loot / .23� - . J� /� / i ✓ /• i _ / // " � ..ram � N//ar PRE / =��� m m �,,1f IEID SE, 2_ =o ,T r N RERMUDA DUNES G r INDIAN WELLS y G PALM DESERT y ' LA OUINTA .% INDIO y0 Desert Sands Unified School District Planning Commission City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 83-049 AVENUE 46 • INDIO, DALIFORNIA 92201 • (714) 347-8631 Attention: Paul Williams, Secretary Dear Paul: June 22, 1978 The request of the Planning Commission for more explicit information regarding future school needs must be addressed in less than specific terms because of several problems which exist. Proposition 13 has already impacted the school district in terms of operational funds. The 2/3 vote requirement for approval of bonds or tax increases will have a stifling effect on our ability to grow in the future. To be as specific as possible, the most pressing need for schools in the near future will be along the Washington Street, north/south axis of the school district. One site in the vicinity of Avenue 44 and Washington and another in the vicinity of Washington and Avenue 52 could provide relief from crowding in both Palm Desert and Indio Schools for a number of years. As a secondary stage in school site acquisition and construction, I believe that consideration should be given to two sites in Palm Desert for future elementary schools. One site might be considered north or west of the College of the Desert. The other should be located south of Highway 111 and could best meet future growth needs if located to the south east of Palm Desert or in Indian Wells. If you have developers making tract plans in any of the areas mentioned, considera- tion of possible school sites to be dedicated should be pursued. In response to your second concern about a high school being constructed in Palm Desert, I must express amazement. I had known long before Proposition 13 was passed on June 6, 1978, that most people did not understand its potential impact. I now am convinced that the Palm Desert Planning Commissioners must not have read the proposition or understood it. The question of what can be done to get the school built is answered in one word, nothing, unless the Planning Commission feels that it can stimulate 671 or more of the registered voters in the Desert Sands Unified School District to go to the polls to vote on a bond election of over $7,000,000. and all vote yes on the bonds. I would hasten to point out that less than 601 of the registered voters in Desert Sands went to the polls to vote in the June 6 election. State wide, only 65% of the registered voters actually voted. The apathetic citizen can now vote no on a bond issue by staying home and he cancels two yes votes in the process. It is apparent to me, and I think should be to any experienced observer of the political process, that until some corrective legislation or another constitutional amendment is enacted Proposition 13 has very effectively precluded construction of a high school in Palm Desert. Paul Williams, Secretary, Planning Commission: Page 2 I should also state, that if funds were available now for construction of a high school in Palm Desert, there would still be several serious questions which would require deep consideration before the Board of Education could commit funds to build the school. The first question would be if the Board could, under the severe budgetary and staffing limits imposed by Jarvis, afford to staff a new high school. Secondly, there would need to be an assessment of the ethnic balance, or imbalance, which would be created by construction of a second high school. Frankly, these questions now seem to be academic. The school district welcomes the involvement of the City of Palm Desert in planning for future school needs. More specific concrete data, hopefully, will be available for input to the planning process in the near future. If any other sources of funding are available, we would like to know about them. We will be happy to join in any discussion of the subject of school planning as you make future land use decisions. RMH/br cc: H. Schoenfeld, Superintendent C. N. Feast, Associate Superintendent Palm Desert City Council S I rely, 4Roger Harlow, Coordinator Child Welfare and Attendance R F. V �. INVIkONM11LNiAL SERVICE$ CITY QF PAW DESEaT; o:ff :!PEnn_nM 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 24, 1978 Dear Property Owner: this is Lo inform you that Lhe My of Valm DeserL has 1nlLialed pruceed- ings to annex approximately 1050 acres of land located generally adjacent to and north of the existing City limits at the request of property owners of said territory. In accordance with its statuatory responsibilities the City has completed a pre -zoning study. To initiate a change of zone and an initial environ- mental study to determine whether a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared for the said annexation. A pre -zoning hearing has been scheduled by the City's Planning Commission on May 17 197R, to initiate the Change of Zone upon annexation as noted Qom• on the attached legal notice. And based on the initial environmental study the City has determined that the proposed annexation will not have a signifi- cant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study setting forth, the environmental information for the finding of a Negative Declaration is available in the Department of Environmental Services at the Palm Desert City Hall. Since the proposed annexation will effect property owners of said territory, we are providing this opportunity for you to be heard on these matters prior to formal action by City officials. We would appreciate receiving any com- ments.you may have by the May 17th hearing date. The recommendation of the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council for consideration on June 8, 1978. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission rk/ks F. X. McDonald, Jr. 1900 E. Ocean Blvd., #1410 Long Beach, Calif. 0302 October 3, 1975 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert, California RE: Amending the General Plan Gentlemen: I own 40 acres adjacent to Sun -King develornent on Portola Avenue, and I wish to voice my protest to the usage assigned to my property in the General Plan. The description of my >ro.)erty is as follows: S w /•I S w'/./ Sec. y . S S. �. ( F x8341m. A copy of tre Gcnercl Plan v:ith my property circled in red is attached for your convenience. Not only do I object to the assigned usage because this property represents a substz•ntial investment of mg life's savings and the usage makes it practically unmarketable, but I also object on the grounds that this property is in the direct natl, of IMMEDIATE growth of Palm Desert and this land will be needed vitally for additional living space if Palm Desert is to expand without the congestion per acre which you are so desparately trying to avoid. There are already developments on the drawing boards on almost all sides of my property, in addition to Sun -King which is already in existence. I, therefore, respectfully request that you earnestly consider changing the designation on my property from Sand -Dunes to Medium or Low Density. Sincerely, F. ll''X� McDonald, Jr. R Q PC a3 X , n 0 c "11 c 3 F4 k ti� �+ co w ova t -4'P w 4 Rb'IK. r� �bjto.f �� za 3 r m Z l �1 i 0 ly LW ]a L, N v � V. N V S jo 4r-� PROOF OF PUB,i. ATION Y (2015.5 C�PJ` J STATE OF CALIFORNIAj ss. County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- lation, published w6ekly, in Palm Desert, County of Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, under date of October 5, 1964, Case Number 83658; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates to -wit: — -6f22 I certify (or declare) under penalty or perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature Date-- -------- _-June._22---- --------- --- _---- _ __-, 197-8 at Palm Desert, California is apace is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp t 1 Proof of Publication of - C:Lty n£--Palm--Des-art-------------------------- Case No. CZ 01-78 Paste clipping of Notice SECURELY In This Space S t0 28,000 • Ya,'YY LLV A. Or lrr-r 1 "I... A S to (1 R-1 12.000 (U.A ) S to P.RrQ I (U.AJ 1 , r ttt•la w •r. m » •ere tt.es rtt. UU., w. err — C..aY nw. on t,rr � S to P.R.-4 W.A.) $49" . .r persons are to _n,er�Cylea Tlan 8, a a1STance or L,aru M reeT TO me ,easterly c r er of said Section 8 said Point being the man corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the erline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country Club e. NCE continuing north 89' 42' 00" east al the northerly of said Section 9, a distance of 5,307.00 feet to a point. Said 1 beingg the northeasterly corner of said Section 9, said t also bein the Country C9centerline intersection of Cook Street and ub Drive. NCE south 00' 06' 00" west along the easterly line of the ?mentioned Section 9, a distance of 3,979.72 feet to a point. pnooint also being the most northeasterly corner in the diary line of the City of Palm Desert. NCE continuing along the boundary line of the City of T Desert the following courses and distances. Thence south " 46' 32" west, a distance of 3,981.26 feet. NCE south 00* 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. NCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet. NCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. NCE north 76° 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.94 feet. NCE north 00- 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. NCE north 89° 45' 08" east, o distance of 3,052.69 feet. NCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. NCE south 89' 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. NCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 66CM feet. NCE south 89' "' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to loiat of beginning. •» •l»• »otv. rY qyu art S to Yf rq.• ��I A.4 f..• I P.R.-iF JOu 6! e<A MAI o wY ann •v ...n .� .�� it L 5 to r4 _ 0-S (u_o) f r4 n Ka' Y u.. J 5 10 ' e �� w. alto a.• a•rr rwv P. p.-S ew., i r(U.A)(a i.tell pYM Nr. yw• �v 1 I heard. SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, City Clerk, City of Palm Desert, California r PDP-6/22tl (Z9*13V� (32>0 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE. PALM Delm, rAUFORNIA92251 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 e, 4ry v 4: . 1 j 0 > W ir 0 Raymond ovley 4895 Hov ey Rd. Vj m rawle\y,C 92227 B il 9 Z 0 0 5 it June 19, 1978 G�llj�r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATLEY 1,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.A.), O.S. (U.A.), OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL BETWEEN MONTEREY AVENUE AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre - Zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2) (U.A.) (Planned Com- mercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.) (Single-family Residen- tial, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon - Annexation), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4 (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S. (U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and Whitewater Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common 4 Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also beinq THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89' 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89' 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89e 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. PC (2) S to R-2 8,000 (8)(UA) a.f41, � uum» A-s.•-f-t sift S to q — -1. pst« LR, 1-11 f «,. 0LM.1 t•1• c Sto U ,.,... R-1 12,000 MAI I I I ' IOeI U fCR k� L 5 «.. ,.,f.' f"' ".,1 ,i S to P.R.-4 W.A.) t"• rteus» n •.. •. �• f r.frolle •n.Y nwl an ur, i ....« S to Pp.-: (U.A ) S to P.R.-'f (UA) fl Lf Rr tlir LIMr .y c...l c o»u. fr n+uaref 0 SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, July 13, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESER'GCAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 0 > J Irene Doyle Z w 4145 Strong St Riverside, CA 62507 0 M > 6 June 19, 1978 CUt:391F o:ff 1PDM .rL „= D(N�=CDZUf-0 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-061I LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATLEY 1,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.A.), O.S. (U.A.), OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL BETWEEN MONTEREY AVENUE AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre - Zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2) (U.A.) (Planned Com- mercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.) (Single-family Residen- tial, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexation), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4 (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S. (U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and Whitewater Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common 4 Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being tha rm�n rnrnor of CPrtinnc A and 0 cniA nnint Alcn hoinn THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89' 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89' 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89' 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. - i• �° °. - •. r . ....° �1 °t..r IxOIOge WY f[S11f fllr ,In� �, ... .Q(2) ,Pc S to S to R-1 12,000 :R-2 8,000 W.A.) I. ti..4`... LLVaOl, cr 1 •--l•-� - 5to i I S to PR.S 1 (U.A.1 i „ PR.-4 �.r j `:'v,[v Wit :I LL.r ry(♦ uxn -•— �. III vx -. `` } �1•'a tU � . va4� 1 1 M . oanYr cnr ,wn _ S to C1 P.R.-4 N.A.) ,...YY P R Q x '_ cevYr. or na+,ml - rtc, wY n ' xY. e,H., L�[r I `I by CN rr `I •. OI xu. SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, July 13, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are an„a+..a +., �++e.,a � a k- k_�,,A 46-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 Frances & Ronald Pushea 3131 Arlington #19 Riverside, CA 92506 ",.. N U am SV Z z0 m June 19, 1978 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PAL►A DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATLEY 1,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.A.), O.S. (U.A.), OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL BETWEEN MONTEREY AVENUE AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre - Zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2) (U.A.) (Planned Com- mercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.) (Single-family Residen- tial, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon - Annexation), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4 (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S. (U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and Whitewater Storm Channel and between Monterey Avenue and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common a Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9. said nnint alsn hPinn THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89' 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89' 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89' 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. S CO R 2 a,000 l8)(UA1 ent.wr r -� ,rcrmr t nn. •�•[ {la• •• •• •• . 1 •• •.aavo n . roux un , S to U R-1 12,01 W.A.) S to P.)2-5 1(4.A.j 14 _ aau. a •.vs ...n 1\ rw+ a,[ n cm crn .StO P.R.-4 (U.A) ,[ens• n cerr,e - t rrVr•, S to vclw• , t•} PR.—'h I U.AI nt+ onmun tw, .F- [ SAID Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, July 13, 1978, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time and place, all interested persons are invitad to attond and he hoard April 24, 1978 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATELY 1,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000 (8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 N .A.), O.S. (U.A.), PR-3 (U.A.), PR-10(U.A.) OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPRO- PRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER CHANNEL AND BETWEEN MONTEREY ROAD AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre -Zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2)(U.A.) (Plan- ned Commercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexation), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S.(U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), PR-3(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 3 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-10(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 10 du/acre, Upon Annexa- tion) or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Channel and between Monterey Road and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common , Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country Cluh Drivp_ THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89' 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89' 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89' 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. (Zt:ajj ::E I1=a I!Dcg�=cm�5D-a 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE May 18, 1978 APPLICANT Palm Desert Planning Commission P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO.: C/Z 01-78 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of XX CONTINUED TO June 14th DENIED APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File .� . , Mirage, a msronce or Z.bbw.tlY veer .rf corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 89° 33' 48" east along the northerly line aertland Section R. a distance of 2.629.98 feet to a no held ionsider a xre, S to S to i' S to R-1 12,000 R-2 8,000 (U.A.) (8)(UA) S to PR-S 1IUA) In^ / n. L I ..., ...... i I S to .- n '[vmu 42' 00" east along the nor#lerl e of 5,307.00 feet to a point. Sol corner of said section 9, sal intersection of Cook Street'bn ioundory line of the City a and distances. Thence soutl 3,991.26 feet. a distance of 1,325.52 feet. o distance of 1,327.45 feet. a distance of 1,592.03 feet. a distance of 3.166.84 feet. a distance of 2,168-56 feet., a distance of 3,052.69 fyet.. a distance of 660.00 feet. a distance of 1,325.00 tee). o distance of 664.68 feet. a distance of 3,977.43 feett PC(2tb)': (UA S 10 PR.-10 ' (UA) S to PR.- 3 W.A.) 5 to O.S. 0 (UA.) �ncu osam un un. --.y � 1 . Lam.. SAID Public Hearing wit be held on Wednesday. May 17, 1978, heaLrd. it 1:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Palm Desert Citv'Hall, PAUA. WILLIAMS, Secretary 15-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California, at which time Palm Desert Planning Commission fnd place, all Interested persons are invited to attend and be 1•. PDP-4127! PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA( ss. County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST, a newspaper of general circu- lation, published weekly, in Palm Desert, County of Riverside, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, under date of October 5, 1964, Case Number 83658; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates to -wit: - -- - - aslzril_ 27, -t972 I certify (or declare) under penalty or perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. .gnatur Date-- ------- ----------April 2T1- 197_8_ at Palm Desert, California Proof of Publication of CITY Or- PALM ASSERT CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 Paste clipping of Notice SECURELY In This Space MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY - MAY 17, 1978 1:00 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL I. CALL TO ORDER MEETING CHAMBERS The regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning was called to order by Chairman Berkey at 1:00 p.m. in Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall. II. PLEDGE - Commissioner Kelly III. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioner KELLY Commissioner KRYDER Commissioner SNYDER Chairman BERKEY Commission the Council Others Present: Paul A. Williams - Director of Environmental Services Ralph Cipriani - Associate Planner Clyde Beebe - Director of Public Works Kathy Shorey - Planning Secretary IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES of the regular meeting of May 2, 1978 of the Planning Commission. On a motion by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the minutes were approved as written; carried unanimously (4-0). V. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Berkey explained the Public Hearing procedures to those present. A. Case N /Z 01-78 - INITIATED BY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMIS ION Request for approval of a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for pre -zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study io P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000(8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.A.), O.S. (U.A.), PR-3 (U.A.), PR-10 U.A.) or any other zone deemed appro- priate on property generally located between Country rinh T)riva nnA +ha Whi+amp+ar .C+nrm ('honnol o'A Minutes Palm Desert Planning May 17, 1978 Commission Page Two Commissioner Kelly asked how accurate the summary of proposed students in the area was. Mr. Williams noted that 700 of the amount would probably be more accurate. Commissioner Kryder noted that Mr. Hirsch's reasons for an average zoning of R-1-7500 sq. ft. are valid reasons and should be �? considered. av Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing and asked if;��Pr~jTI I there was anyone wishing to speak on the matter. -F. X. MCDONALD, Long Beach, owner of 40 acres on the southwest, southwest corner of Section 9, told 1'7 % -rhe Commission of his conversation with the various �f neighbors in the area of his sand dunes and how they and he were in favor of the Open Space desig- nation being changed. He also noted that the sand - dunes are being destroyed by 4 things: the sage brush, dune buggies, adjacent developments, and the City protecting them. Mr. McDonald stated that the whole area should be reserved as a sand dune preserve or none of it. MR. RAFF, owner of 3.95 acres, a homestead parcel located on Monterey and Hovely Lane, asked to have it clarified how the proposed zoning would affect the small land owner such as himself. Mr. Williams stated that as the pre -zoning was being done as a single project, individual property owners would be exempt from the minimum site area required to obtain a Change of Zone to the P-R zone. As a result, in- dividual property owners would be able to develop under the PR zone no matter what acreage they owned once the pre -zoning is approved for the entire area. He further stated that this zoning designation would limit the area to condos and residential homes. Chair- man Berkey noted that the staff would then be the co- ordinator for all the property in the area. Mr. Raff stated that he must dedicate land for road use. Mr. Williams noted that since Hovely Lane already exists that there should be no problem. RICHARD ARNOLD, 73-722 Santa Rosa, an adjacent developer told of his experiences in other areas with sand dunes, and he noted that adjacent development would stop the sand dunes from being sand dunes as it takes sand to make sand dunes. EUNICE PIERSON, representing Mr. Hirsch, noted that Mr. Hirsch would appreciate further consideration of his request for 8,000 sq. ft. average per lot. SID HANDY, Aster Drive, 18 year resident, spoke in op- position to a open space in the middle of the City. Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission May 17, 1978 Page Three VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) A. Case No. C/Z 01-78 (Cont.) GEORGE MARZICOLA, President of Country Club Property Owners Association, noted he is generally in agreement with the proposed zoning and annexation. He stated that the extension of streets and the improvements of others should be taken into consideration with a bridge considered on Cook Street. Further he noted that the Association is opposed to annexations because of the Excise Tax involved. RICHARD GUELICH, Santa Cruz, noted the extensive work that the Staff had put into the report on the pre - zoning and he noted his concern for the ability of the City to maintain the open space. Chairman Berkey stated that he felt the case should be continued for further review. Commissioner Kelly stated that more input is needed on the utilities in the area and the maintenance of the sand dunes. Commissioner Kryder indicated more information was needed on the traffic situation. Commissioner Snyder asked that Staff be able to answer the questions regarding maintenance of the open space and alternatives to an open space zoning designation. / On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission continued Case C/Z 01-78 to June 14, 1978 for further review and study; carried unanimously (4-0). B. Case Nos. DP 03-78 and 80C - MCBAIL COMPANY, Applicant Mr. Williams noted that these cases and Case No. TT 11791 should be continued to June 14, 1978 also due to the action of the Commission on the pre -zoning. MIKE GALLAGHER, representing the applicant, noted his agreement with the continuance. C. Case No. TT 11791, continued as noted above. D. Case No. CUP 07-76 - HENRY TAGLE, Applicant Request for approval of an extension of time for an approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the construc- tion of a restaurant with Variances from parking re- quirements and setback requirements on property located at the northwest corner of Palm Desert Drive and San Carlos Avenue. Mr. Williams reviewed the case and noted that the Commission had approved a previous extension of one year. Chairman Berkey declared the Public Hearing open and asked the FF RIVERSIDE- . ' /1 ° < CWM(FI SECTION r CURNEM w COMMON SECTION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE � A TRIGOER 4•.r n.I i 2 PROPOSED PALM CESERT CITY LIMIT iS tO9 S to )PC �) -j R-1 12,000 S to -y (U.A.) PR.-10 CLAK* _ LNNE -r— - ( U.A.) LIMIT I ECTION B -9,-S, k-6-E S.B. 'R.-5 WA) tS SE(TION 9 „ o 5-S, R-6-E S B B M. I P.R.- 3II 67 ACR xrsxwa, r` - - boa W.A.) o _. ]ln 4s' PROPOSED PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT rn L - I A _ e S la + t I]2].0c' ! !9•.f'OB W E • :'., PALM DESERT CITY 'LIMIT — �� S s e!•as'!2'w »er a' o O w > LOCATION MAP 6 NOT TO !U. I. O a F f a 3032.69 \illl 12 _ S to U.A) 8 PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT PR.-4 (U.A.) COMMON SE CORNER ! 6 9 1 T — — 910 16 l _ I IS SECTION 17 0 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE T-5-S,R-6-E S.B.B.M. PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT _y » ]e M L.A.F. C.'78 - iLDOp a!• '.. 0, CONiRpL .•.._ °ATE :.1.-TB PROOPO'SEDANNEF TIIMO NO. 5 CN4 + TE CITY s LE I': ROD' CK:Rft I (mxx W 46-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (T14) 348-0611 1 is Virgil Christine Rutle4 18183 San Marta St. Fountain Va y, CA 927081Z r= 'Ir 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 April 24, 1978 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATELY 1,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000 (8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.A.), O.S. (U.A.), PR-3 (U.A.), PR-10(U.A.) OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPRO- PRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER CHANNEL AND BETWEEN MONTEREY ROAD AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre -Zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2)(U.A.) (Plan- ned Commercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexation), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S.(U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), PR-3(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 3 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-10(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 10 du/acre, Upon Annexa- tion) or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Channel and between Monterey Road and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common , Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country THENCE south 001 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89, 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89' 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89. 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00. 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89. 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. S to R-2 8,000 (8)(UA) ..., . i .., S to('., R-1 12,000 W.A.) _ r. .u•Lu � uAu tlrr 4nr t_ � I ' S to P.R.-5 1 (O.A.) )0• 61 1 L IUx MIN ..wnn �[!t {fir L y f .. • . l— L. SEES.' rnr Lw,r «LY ,nur nrr S to O.S. S to O.o[.) P.R.-4 W.A.) [ %� LpNn� , 5_' t + IlaoYtl wx raw mr L�nr � S to_ 10 to P.R.- 3 WA) i MUNI WE LILXr { 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 June 5, 1978 Mr. John F. Cyprien Vice -President and General Manager Palm Desert Greens Association 73-750 Country Club Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: C/Z 01-78 Prezoning Dear Mr. Cyprien: In response to your inquiry of June 1, 1978 please find attached a copy of the legal notice for Case No. C/Z 01-78. Said notice was sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property which did include a number of property owners within the Palm Desert Greens complex. This matter will again be con- sidered by the City Planning Commission on June 14, 1978 at 1:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. If the Planning Commission arrives at a recommendation, the City Council would consider the matter on July 13th, 1978 at 7:00 p.m in the City Hall Council Chambers. Your organization's imput would be welcomed at either of these meetings. If you have any further questions regarding this matter please feel free to contact me. ours very truly, Paul A. Williams PAW/tb c.c. C/Z 01-78 L) June 1, 1978 Mr. Martin J. Bouman City Manager Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Martin: I was somewhat surprised when I found out indirectly that there was a public hearing held by the Palm Desert Planning Commission on May 17, 1978, regarding the rezoning of the property directly to the south of us, in and around Monterey and Country Club. My question is: Why were we not notified of said hearing? I would think that we would definitely be in the realm of concern and influence regarding any change in zoning, and should have been properly notified of the hearing. It is my understanding that after testimony, this hearing has been continued to June 14th, and I would appreciate being notified in the proper manner, so that I can take the matter up with my Board of Directors. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. S cer , oh Cyprien Vice -President and General Manager JFC:lw PALM DESERT GREENS ASSOCIATION 9 73-750 Country Club Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260 (714) 346-8005 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 24, 1978 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you that the City of Palm Desert has initiated proceed- ings to annex approximately 1050 acres of land located generally adjacent to and north of the existing City limits at the request of property owners of said territory. In accordance with its statuatory responsibilities the City has completed a pre -zoning study. To initiate a change of zone and an initial environ- mental study to determine whether a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared for the said annexation. A pre -zoning hearing has been scheduled by the City's Planning Commission on May 17, 1978, to initiate the Change of Zone upon annexation as noted on the attached legal notice. And based on the initial environmental study the City has determined that the proposed annexation will not have a signifi- cant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study setting forth the environmental information for the finding of a Negative Declaration is available in the Department of Environmental Services at the Palm Desert City Hall. Since the proposed annexation will effect property owners of said territory, we are providing this opportunity for you to be heard on these matters prior to formal action by City officials. We would appreciate receiving any com- ments you may have by the May 17th hearing date. The recommendation of the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council for consideration on June 8, 1978. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission rk/ks Uft11Tr o:ff le:' Innlla 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA92260 April 24, 1978 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATELY 1,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000 (8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 N.A.) , .A.), O.S. (U.A.), PR-3 (U.A.), PR-10(U.A.) OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPRO- PRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER CHANNEL AND BETWEEN MONTEREY ROAD AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre -Zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2)(U.A.) (Plan- ned Commercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, Upon Annexation), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-4(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S.(U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), PR-3(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 3 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-10(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 10 du/acre, Upon Annexa- tion) or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Channel and between Monterey Road and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common J. Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89' 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89' 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00, 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89' 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. s ro.. .. - � LPR.-IO 4...Pc (2) S to S to R-1 12,000 R-2 8,000 (U A) (8)(UA) s.cnox e to l} S to P.R.-5 (VA) i I P.R.-3 Via. sr ncn (U.A) " a w E _ y ....., ,.,... - 5 to M,LIL b,. 1,4„ O.S. :--- ' S to (u.a.) .<,1.. P.R.-4 M.A.) o .p --CO.." ol.nusm[— i' 2J F 621- 20 /,z 400, 77 r C. A. 7519 7544 7545 52 SEC. 8 r. 5 S. R. 6E. \�J DATA R/S 14/JS O B7/34 4EPl 1967 t'-CI'. - .'ri'd 04i: -rt L04W2n1 >\r 31DT2 -I& \9\T \C ','%Z 971 Tfi no .K. E1E..'IC! W- TC EE' ` tam;T(fy `MCICI( Yq J1r• Tt f00� •ii f.l1 Tt�21C-14Stfl-f .a t7f20J tJ-M .:T 1 B tQ! �pt2 TCF� \YFl fffit� 0 U0(�0 .ifiC On•0 f WI.206-416.4 6-0� I22.5 al\f i�g�Tr�� ICpgrv�CCngC �C�O � 2f6T i\({�"p9131.Ti 1* SEEaMElS06 WTbS AS _. _..' / •rt ► 0 tp['.. ■{Rrt 1,CO1i�[iCT (L:'ibrii.rcc 64 i10 nt;r NNI °n Oaf u:-z6a-an•I TC 0 lun tux 2i6t TCTL( YXly IN Yi AWE•L.l--�- l' "Limm W Ir. CC i0 t00."ICp 0 In-0 f WI.2N-ON-1 f' 0-� tf34 RAW■rT ief-01Qt rt-- op'yC1M(�Y[1 - `2Yi1 ii�rEri It00y T�tWAES\(J)R pI SE[ Eiy[!tp{ Wt commiNTE11 W In (-0 1mm in `%�t�tynq'I�fp�fy�[ii112t fE[i�2N27 2622C,72 1/4 or CC t� fC��7T��•-�0pp�t�0�0 /2poZ002 wr A 1#MC'IYC[It`t .M-il... AO °'0-OOf WI.200-014-2 4I3' {0N• o7l-glf uI-2oa-e l'-J uJr U 3' ttlr _mAcm 4-3s' C .saG &tJ Ay - /oc .? v l020- 1AD-0ZZ3 4r,a0 - /X(D- o0-/ AV 6/el, - 0 zo- e�v %j 6>/9- o6o - o0-3 6i4/ - 0 60 - o/ r �/< 064 -oi G. 6/57-09O - ��� 0 7 D e (:�/9-evst-t-D/6 i CG24,, d ft,,� a-7,�r .� . 620- 2oc, -- ® }- ->-- oez� vm,.,,R �rtcO-es�-�- 6 Zo -zoo- 0 2 3 �Paticn�=ems %� 7770� d-e24 ✓ �d� 1„�¢ ixe.�/e� 6 zo -) oo - o Z5L / 370 -777o G A40-7 // l Lc Yo _ Zpo - o 6 Yv - 2-vo - O 2- C . 6"�-o -1tio -ov7 o2- i5-6 620- 20 9 400' �B) T. c A 7526 S 2 SEC 4 T. 5S. R.6E. /9 I I I I IIWAr I Soo., ,�OAr ,00 A[. S.At ! OOAr ,OOA l3� 0 QB 4 // (/2 /' i%4 ro ooA[. I OOAr S.00As. S.00A[. SODA, SOOAr IOOAc ., OOAc IOOAr I I /7 I 10 I@ I@ S OOAc /5 SOOA[ ,6 Soo Ar SOOIr ,6 ,OOAr IWAr Iooh SOOIr tl1 4[ t!� I[ r©[ I6)A[. I@r 90[ I@Ac � / CL UB o COUNTRY z cue+..._ iJ. �✓-�.4,.,._. �0.7 .�.s�✓ E. Z7 9+ A.r o bin . � o -, S � BK ®mow ti Ow TA GLO PLAT 154,� All 70-i7/ ,7 7 -706 Q i COMMON SECTION a COMMON SECTION COMMON SE 6 CLVAEk COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 5 CORNER COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CORNER [OUM111Y CLUB DFIVF 5 4 • j T 8 Wa9`JJ'u"2 e2s vv'I es°aa'oe"2 2e2D.a6' N99-42, co c PROPOSED, PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT JJo7.00' I 1 10 I PC (2) x rR-2 8,000 CLPNCY N ' (8) i ME PR OPOStiD PALM DES I AT CTy IIMIT 3 o SE(TIOM�i 8 SECTION 9 • 6 I T-I� S.8.8. s > I I T-S-Si R-6-E S.8.B M. I V j �10461.67 ACRES ' h 3 M `-^ PROPOSED MLM DESERT CITY W s asn. J• LIMIT g 1 SEC /4 SECTION .A P.O.B. o le It I W 0 0 rPILID�IERT PARCEL MAP 9328 BOOK 36 PAGES 83-85 e o CITY LIMIT 0 0 5 89°.6•32-W J9el ,26 • (, I �s / PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT • PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT COMMON SECTIOh° e ° CORNER 7 8 8 9 nn..J' 9 f 10 _ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SECTION 17 0 T-5-S,R-6-E S.B.B.M• w o PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT M'NITEW47ER i RIVER W' I z•`Jz'sA 9 `o I ' -W LA.F! _ W PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT "°• ••• FLOOD C V.0 w 0• 8 PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. CONTq • OL DATE 2-14 -78 TO CNAN MEL THE CITY OF PALM DESERT `.l'y/^s`. - IN SECTION 8 9 9 17,T-5-S R-6-E S.E CVY ENGINEER ENOIN EERIND DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM F5 r c. A. �80; 7sao N 2 SEC /7 T 55. R. 6E. 22 20 7 /6 ) OL\if I /2 iif\s QUA 41 'iz, �L I n 3, 6214r. 6 t AC ° �i/�i 41 34 N I N C . 6.992AC G h i /6 - i I252Ac. s 1 I iao Jir CVC.WD (� I 462OAc : I � � 4140 27 a I 105414114 v � /4.37Ae t JV ` I a 1 I I1LL .i 111. qi • `Sii v 'Lil VB 8 19 /6 I it DATA 8/S 20/38 34161 29/58 ✓s) 37/ 7 ASStSSO6S MAP 6K 621 P6 35 RNER9/DE cODN7Yi CALIF. 5FP7 967 '.aYry[,0p7[{(07l�92yh !•:. !�\ - ^. I �!R bf9q 1[t4 •'![SCIIYIOM b(1 bME550{! n, ^ Rbb tvO { Ol i U�MpE�EE[Szp,��rblC uMME {!OE 1C15E��E(1110M1bEE 3M-.bb0:S5 1�9pSfll,pTE 0b2E9i IES u{ •il #!Otf_I2: ul-l6t-OI5-b 2:M' Mrt Y {{ C5 �9G9 :AECWAS 91 COMliMCE ON{I: .'! i�oiii bib:ir�`1�125�`•.:Esca° .. -Ibn. �- N;E SIM! 01.01-1.1 155ESSWE5`R"L- +N 1:E VEli !Or2/91 .9:E SIle. .. .'!.Ry !E' •• 953ESSEE, ANKS. -SC2Iit ICM vl Tit bSW1 bC Are Sep SfOs t Y[ , 29.. Ol -001 u1-350-01/-" Tr1 71 !/ iEjl IYES OIL i1ppE11:E9 E-00 UK c�St IT COW YWE 0 1 04/73 N.0 K�E� bl tY >Op YE 1/! CE sEc I] \M rY1MM EOETOl9. OEfCi{o•:;n s•E lMEssOp! '-% W2 .0 :110, C:5.O17 621-350-014-0 .1'R CI's TGp[p0 PUKI,IEb '-O0 •/i1 �1_p��t3/ `m TV 1CAIO'. l!E i16KF O:NMtI O,/:3 COOE p9 p1, _ 1 }0, L MIICM kWSSCRSM K i {f(� OEM SEE YA'S !/ fSW o'2' 01 MG-022 1 Q'5 a a COMCIpIpM�!{yam} LD LT, 0 ELT! NOR 0F,210"SEwl VUSEOCOKOE�yO� OS17 Mi3 4 �IM:CM,SE' NESlC93 Cd `Oli_ Sf0 Y'b OEOIL t \i„0 ITS:III RI-MO.Oi]4 610 / sIt S,i I�ppf1{pi IbB ` Ypp1y ,Y )9w1 J1[ COR ILW[IMiE 3 pI �E� 11 y: _Iglglq((( K��lY p mIc.2SEE &- 41p3 <_ 2.20 °" !OS 101L 4M n' n` T C A. 7526 N 2 SEC. 9 T. 5S. R. 6 E. COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE IL y r PA 1 I DATA OLO PLAT 2Q RIS 34138 455F.5SOR'S MAP BK. 621 PC,. 23 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF APT /967 2Yi WM$IICITCO L05C INVESTMENT CC '+20 O'i-!•. 621-1N-CI'.-9 Haf ;fNO MjlSON W; Lk 2>;< N 2fT-INN! 'JSC pa T• 0-f COWfFIMCE Il:•t W, ,:NE' N�' IN I'll LOT iN NOO!l. C 14 o.0 CA COn IWSp1SEC`LAND INVESTMENT C[ f'f: :..I 22 :•. ,.e, rrGGLN SM11f10Eb SOLD Ea N CI 9E 0 SEE 0EVANNNzm-N a TTO.O 'J7pE CODEggyyn CONVEYANCE IN94 !I ]I NO' !. IN PON LCT 17 NN 033rt A �pW MOVED .1LIDN CIrvE9WTMNENI f7h0EYCEN� 'J[ TVV[f TV IN9:J 11.'1 ,ECI A IL IN PON LOT }Y MNC33, ON NOO �tlREISE5 :;906: 3': 26 ui:-23b'.:-; 2Wc -\\ .COE. WORM O-V SLa.E EmLc, \I E�,N.T MIT NaS W IESiO ION. CA 9227: J LANE ;1LN IVAMCE ONOV1 07175 ' aaaCC0���555n ir,. ,OTp SE�Ei<y p[6CIItTICO SeCN' 2, if .N lki M:L •.24r. ,wE. N,NCC li S 'uE n LGT It �, sta PON ACT :a Mf P6:CwOL;g a M.T CIO TIED1 TtwIw iGF CG•k2E� PON LOT to 48•/I 9I AIM U `. ON 2500 23b i ?o- DA/i' E.S9G90 ..S I26 521-2'_: ,. EA F . A L. A E I NAE ;D99 P A.ATA ST A921, SE ! NJIAN:E '525b C. 'b 39.3. A:.rs •' IN PCN NN I A Cr SEC 9 '•S Nbc iON `: L. )ES:NP/!ON 51. A8E55C25 "A'w n IS Y• 59•'.. !-5 :. b; D2?? -r` 1.: 5r JJ�A�,�JEy iN S. /T W2AAyy M "iE" PM P✓ 0.- /T AEyi IM�MDCAA'tC °1 Y tWE n COMIEYAK: 0,ID93 [T 39.3A NOR SIL IM PoS AWE 1,• pr 5E, 9 15`. AAA1,01190M DD OTAI OESCY ION SEE A55.'55if TAI fCp/�MADl3 i. ppy9E, N/9 N O KN I6102 tE11N �MM.1 T H E 'q LL,,pp{� A"KLES• U 90,60 USE COOC TT COMIiYANCE A6 2?2 05 :2 96.tb ACR! vL A _i A CT 5;1 A IN TOTAL %LPTION SEE ASESS AS :Y9ED :t•NI D. JDSEI 'LYE ((C�.AC LL,, _ i i SAINiICCAN 92�262 iM :ObE�EyTV ACM IAWE pi01S1E.IS I y NOL fi 90'11CL USOMAOM"5EE An Sa':NSS •'S! .I?S: I S2Sb IP� "'NIK"L��yCE�1l{ -E AE :pE C SLOT i m 02 LOT p1 Is a A7N 0M DAMMO AE :OOE C Lay AWIL a a INFIR Alit Filift M niruc LOT 5 a li :AM AIT 9ApLTD p� SC '.CA C LOT 2 O M A AI At C LOT I " M ... :-I9m 25-5 •1 �� '. � . .. 1, - 0C' LC A. 75/1 SEC. /O B //, T 5 S., R. 6 E. 02 • - _ � L z 2 90.a2AC' O 7 3 PAR.2 PAR.1 f /60.894 1 :62�) Y 1EiN � o,at ✓ O7 3 FVOOA. Z"A'. y /O @QI2ACt 78 66L AC. C O A J: p. CB BI B fJ4c i� /Jb O) N B Data pS 9160,24141,44173, 46127 w O p K y q K O 9 Ar 1 8 8 /0 t AC. ASSESSOR'S AMP SK. 619 PG 09 RIVERS/OE COUNTY, CALIF j- '5-6 621-24 01 7526 r. C. A. S 2 SEC. 9 T5S. R.6E. 23 OA TA RiS 34138 40 &0 PLAT 5EPi /967 6651P.W.IaI. !CI `ME TG: 7741 aiMi17( CIA Slp] `` IDOIESA.:EMIIl1101 36 bSgT C L+rc ST: . !*a a6Ec E1EW':,5 1. EI, "TWA E E. ET 1t Ef001 L'1-876 itl-:38-LII 167W ;:1Y 6 66 �(Lq 1. " 1t 1. 3j�6. E' IL -w. '. v 16 p26p V a11[0', 'e Mc[ 061111 G. 7. :CJE SST :iwvV1ppE61.6 1 '09 1VAL OCSC ft WI Ire 6f .tt S T! 101 SF 6 1915 ���1c e1 AI.E11ITr 11.G1 X 2760E0 oil -or 621-1.0-661-2 5'Si: \ li }nn cE 17 C 6(�n Ucconvvwf 11i(6(7E 66^' f6166 TOe4tC1lcIilTIW SEE1666C!W" 1 C1M0 S. UK EKE loot,"�CeWT&WA =I 1711.6 110.11T9111, 16 Po6„6E ISEE�1�CSS7S65i PS ACT 077JYLL.OE6C[�SKty�S1L_r dw/` INO e SOL:.t t[KES� 1)1/ S1pppp611790-t 6062 .SE :CCF cdlS1IyE16KL COO 11. 72 •L1i 117ff 161 S•OK Do r 6.O 1[IE5 ar 1'...: 2 T r25 E26 -r '22C 1710E %e c uet-17... (�(F ✓Ls1lf�E7.{l n AM• 1: G6• 14% blue Kt- A.10 se-• .EItP C:c AM 15E "G.t -1 Ri11j WIME, 22 6LE A= : 11 4.E1 &m,k •:+ 207 _05'y PALI Smile J1E :»E •r .a 1;-1E5 .rL 1 Iff FU 'C16E .611 r cm IIISSL J1E CWt[5• �orf f 1N6 p*cfil.l -;'E • ° c 1E\ iCOG 16.1:4 ./o.; 1.00 1'SES n 116E 2 '. •i:.'. lgif 17.11-TT 154p11[e`-1: L q1 '.• .E61 :147 11wr17TU 11'f Sli1e 01•e l-Ti o' ' "Itou. 16�. KK611T106 !Y 1U AS"? 5,-_ L15_ S'1 7 lE21 aw 1\E1 Iro tT It 11�. T. -s Pals IINOVES� N.�IrI��66' TEfw 110.111 M-M-012 5 Nt lew Wrr .116Ti' t1 dlRIu 10 i ei�' L 15-6-Z 621- /9 6 5 3 / "- 400, 711 34' T C A. 7541, 7527 COUNTRY N 2 SEC. B T55. R. 6 E. !� I I Y 0 O ram, i It. Of e<s I � I I e � ZJ Z/ C (may v !1 12 /S ..® 0 .� 4 c 7ci hphp DATA R/5 34138 SEPT. 1967 PI :E 51799 �'"°�"" waoanexr Nuµ ruN inc ¢Ax a -;a •N�er(ml vx.r- msu As votlp� NET 10 Ass INNER, ADDRESS, DESCRIPTION V TEA ASMNT NO LANC fTO TIV PERS PROP ENENP'IpNS WFI 27sM pgOq�ryryLLLLAVT VA1.,, A, p0EEET AL IN2000 07b027 621-190-009-6 55500 9s50 BETT5EVMENTON R Ei,,`TYALET AL IC R-00 CCN�D/Q 6 ,J 1OL AL C/O PEARSON SCOTT I 10 E:OE D'CnC2T�CDMlEIAXCE 14 059 I1: 1N 00 ACRES NIL 'N PRO ME I/9 Cr SEC I T55 FOR 1OTAL dDOC IPTION SEE A55ESS045 5 Ell LAWN INVESTMENT CO 9AOCO 075-027 621-190-045-8 15506 CIO VOOOPECME OEV CO 'CC 0-00 P o SON PALM OEs , CA 922H CAGE TT CONVEYANCE t2 .1C4 05175 92 FCORR TOCRES TAL DISC IP110% SE �ASSC5 AS 511 Pi`A2SD9EFS94P Ao RAFF TD710 0755.OQI 62LDO-0x7-0 2175 ON VPLAIEJO SCA 92{{]5 CODE VY CONVETANCE ppFFOlttl7 01175 L AFODORR TOTAL I DESCUPTTIAM DM 5E1 ASSSESSORSSS B TErRRKATDK41W N. 10000 f 5ONI 621-190-098-1 250C iATO 0#S0 MD CLCOVEYAxCE012t11 01/19 S ACRES NIL IN POO NM ITtt5 V OF SEC T FOR TOTAL 2ESCRIPTI SEE ME RS 1 ww w MUM W <331w1w NI ,/Y fX 'IL'I �7'� /p A • *i1R1 Ol�d9 �f tllll P1w11 3�Jwryf)IA/) 7�1 L17Li T l3 �r N OOSi S-fSO-OfI-ILI 110•�!O Ow/st �wyplw �f{ �1 Ml 1 wl f22pJ2M JO A1i711171W R: VIOL ww OOSZ <-tAD-461-Itt NO-0LD 0000f � J lO9 tMx ip Tppp� .Op�y3w� 7�fiNpi /pJZi/LO NIIIM'3IMWpNI LYLGN]N SLI:O IlfLe{ 7JN, 1ITJtit�^1l: uuu 1 DOOR f-ISO-061-In 140-0L0 0:001 O11uuwl€I Oii �NpO� �L 37{ 441 I:a3i !0 I IMw� Nl Tti:lLia 9L-6 SLID WRID r'V.3A0J j a 7 2 1{ 11 ,OOGE 0O@ 2-OSO-461 lE9 IWILO 0000-0 0I •N�111FLS IMJIO1:1O1 Id" SS t[ !0 1'II�MIYJI I li.�L3N SI 9 �J�3� SZ110 f92€b4 3YN,'1 JT. .A 3CO2 3p9A NJ 9 7OlI OOd OOSL 2-6<Ogfl-129 1l0-C(0 :OOOf OHIO, ".l LIN 940114WI13 e01e wit N11 01; MI ON LNYS9 /ll Al NOI4d6N30 '%3wOf 73GS3M SI/IS 3:Ye (OLZA .) IL-LL MA Al 804 1101-1N3NLSiSSO L: 10-10 „41-YAw Nl 1 77f !0 Y IlMlwf NI )iiit]p9 tL^Y pp 9:It1 IIw1/ M441NO: (�y3�I�a 3gGJ3 3w DOSE 10SZ 1-h0.9t1-119 1�0-5[0 DwOt {1ppS3{w 3G�Igjl,al�Ni.q� 17NL~/N311gM�7�y� S91 1 % N Y:I A WluMli}�IDi�Oi]9 9f'i L' li 11t�11 3 N91'f1MtJ_ .f Val 150 LG JNLYIa t1i12 uN� AA )lost, Qli t; li �'<J��!1 I'P I• -S.) UO({f ilYi Jtll eVx; .NJlc;va i.e Af �.'r' ae r. i A wi l J AY7 { as om 1.1a-011-I19 All Wt "`Y'+`11iid7u M 6311 611611,411111 ICU QUAIL Its ONVI 01 &Wn pal Al MI3Ytlam'MiN1 33@MN t-N4a 01IR i"rI (11eIYIU) IL -IL Nr3A 3141 10! 110a-1N3NaM{I U-lahla I 1 1,311 K 1011141 i 01 IY i U Y m I'm MOM ow. OR 0-1s0-011-l" 100-OLa 00001 00- ]++ Dose 0-LSO-001-IM I I- LO 00001 OOW 9-f00-961-lef Ito.st6 00001 009e L-M-011-Ior 100-SIO 00001 o -o Me OK?r-.a-ea-Izf MILD oeoh 31 13. "CLIMAX] IOU aL All. W1 00111 4"I LNYir tel Al fills 3CYc fnamMI) IL-LL pr]A 3p1 p0! 110p-lN3YKii0Y ...e l-N,.. 000a 00B 0-1f0.961•lef M:1,0 00001'. ' I writ-3Y 2A CWl ]3C .11"' 00 N110%Yl& SLf 10 •0000f iJNpA3Alp1 {7GAla IT An 0 11ft3 wig pA7� 1 IN710) NppppY�3L;Y ,3Y YICIyY11IN30 �.:0: boI Im SS! 1 141 JO .11 3M aW YI I'Y Ism {LI, OL'10 Le9e10 33NYpAlO3 A. 3111 000fs �M1"W 6 LILM lll�v]Jy.pLI3110a6M AA�YNWApLIN rOaff1h][INO01YYp1 ipCq Yp 1I �OMlf i51 1A7]S l�.11l?110Y NI 1/YL�]Y NL-. %Lr10 %Wit 3]M�:•QpaA ion 3N06 us La Is � folb]t I vwm yap��3�p �3{ Np 7{3p MIN ]li N .IItY�1lIa01 ■1 S/YLi3aT 7 .L110 1[0L10 33NrA311) AA W 3 JM 105Z l,M'3`13NOOYI�M _>S �CYYLYNIYY Na0g3Y�N 7 101 111- •A 1N..A 'N1 o �./I �x /il 1 3,p at0 NI 6.110 Ma 0 33NIA11KNI) ua'T 1'9; �OS.i M3 vr�llr a��3rnuu >asz NOl1r:13230 'Mall, 'IMMV N ::-IOiO e:c Cti 1 73{ 104 NrI�L�{]NII;�:ll3p3r U'N 1010 Ce1el= a:.N3AYlo7 AA m 3G". [1 Ir r(Yv1"?"30Yi " N `r i� � M(1,�, nru33irf 40. 1,05Y f•� V.��., ..��� G 1 p-::V IET Y�� '$�1ea i; k;`1�CA0 IOOeO e7I T" ul-If O-Op-1 ills TI (OR "Y- 'MVEYAKt g1•17N7 11171 [ CC • 7N A[EtN Nr iN N � �fM i �� 1p .� r -•AL Eaate i, L �fEfNEI COME%p07i !' p�� f10,� 1�ee0 e7E CCI 071-Ife-060-0 200E .'e'tEx�O `tt,�� P1/pM1lYt■Ntt11, Lp e1(2M�t ttl�ITS Y[ Iro�ETUTALMOfK/:°11415EE ip LM zssa 2000 ...;-12... 07-01-77 ASSESSREeT-EOLt FOR INE YEtO 77.7E t.10R2717 .A# st$17 Al6CgMEE. LODEEIS. DESCRIPTION E0 IRA ASpI MO LAND STO 17'i PEAS MM EVE"PT10101 NET pL C5LIM 1 .Oal0000 0,3u1-I90-051-1 2310 230 /UG� }EN 0 1i021 UK CODEEn CMEYAACE"l�:s 'Xt'p,Of�iOfIpSE11I inJ• 110e0 07;-001 ul-lfe-oM-1 4 2101 751 Art }27 OIM��' � CODE III CONpEEEY1ANCE +17T0 ` 1/4 cr N.ESS0E3 44146100 ME 0E /OTALIppE11.'110N SEE NAP{ }�000 0,0-001 A2Lif0-OAI-2 M00 2!1 •.i 11frM A�L��T AC 7411006 EWiYyEYA��NCE 0y1 `A y175 p1'OSI E7M(�1 CpR •OIL itEX010110N SEE SEC E 9 161 IIAVI MITTga" A. 10000 07 0:001 RI-190-OQ-f me AI WEE�tC�AEl1 7 2227 it M rdV&""Cf 0S1{17% pEIS%1 sh NIM imnk'OEICEIOIIdIOMC Af1EM0E6 011:8O1 RI-If0-00-. 2370 231 NpMnIppS1���yE�/�p�1�LL,�MMA�Sf. 11SOO 0 0 0y'D& u[ a(R�• V$ EdrvpEETSACKE1 `N 1011175 pf a 1CTgrNDE1C1p17WOKE E ALM .p0.17p. C7 HIS Aa To AO N r7N I7P6 I. TA sr.E•1II11 M'L NSN CRI113r eI1 Ip Noll•��VO oyf 'e Mall I �c:wc1 •r r, fay 41 -QQrl W-Daae1-r 77n �d Rf:4 1� �•// Iva K) •:DES . l .� •�A I{ r p�{ 31EE�� �� TTyy �ePo !C!r. .E3JV ICI RC MINOR .n]-t2... C1-01 17 ISSESWLT-iCU 0CA IMI TEII 71.71 dMM274) 11;E sill/ AMEME. ICAN31. MUIrTIN Eu M e3A7 IC LAIC $TI KN IIM EIEMTICM W 1C ELMEi [a iu 7 'ISO en.iol L71-If1-IN ) 1373 nn TA sa Ni ' "It UiDC1114TISMrsEE %. Ism relS IT .1. SI. 0n-Ni 37I-1I-011-0 735 nn Irt 1 LIr1 1� 0.00 I: 0 )7}j70 . R UIVE.YU OUT 4117) r.711 AM I'f 1. AM IE P% OF KC A 135 WE rM 1010E DMAIIIIM SEE ;;/A fisFpl�EpM 1I7°e oTo-0a1 ul-lfO-ofL-1 IS: I 1373 31 �pp7y010 0 p' s1°CyT�u1°97 �1[ CpCE.• 1ip1p1n /I ``EIEOgNEN��Ii{p0ff-0171d71 �ESS.M! ii[ r�pl310,YUC[SIII7191SEE .Ire TC504 0751_Qa1 671-190-501-E 7)n n NIT If u SC°YYEIWEE 011 Illn U \pTIEI rM°UE MIM SEE eSSE33pl! 19A 07 071 ACi VAN via •P 4 &M p 1741.77 Alstmo T-SOLE rM 1w RN 77-71 tIMMOn) An SAW n sMAKF. MOM INEOIHIN rY IN NISI 00 111C 510 TIT SIN "1110 P m"Will 1V 111 ■ C'V MK. cTa^,Pp WET 7C 'K0 :-x TWO 1'. 189" ...E-Il... a2c a6/ 6a•c'i> :EV41 IC\!l[ NKN010 i.1%41 07-01.77 LSSESSKNI-MOLL E01 TOE 1116 /700 E00IOEE70) 04a lgif N!KWE. OOO:E55. OEfc0illics E'1 144 "PAT N0 LAND All T/i NL 0K0 ENEWWf OR 'E "aii 1NT�i6(TiTLL L6 �iGMT oT3-=al u)-tN-ou-f t7n t rl s V2ru T__ k L in c1c LNU 07�SN)�NLIM I of I lAE n CL'WETWE1 Ny.:6 piOga[fN YIY 6 0` 1 ToAL, DMAitil tOwTSK iSfa�iptl IN, tYi N. Nn 1� eEsl�icE�a � � n OETYKE 6i II�T6 9000 0n-N1 WNf I-1f0--0 It ru nn n3 '.24 mTaiaulmcnnioN mE iMAN /1 L. f '1111E' TT UKE 616$1 9540 0n-,- 621-I94-070-0 7575 nn ..n m N/L to ION NE P. - 0Ec i iK yE EON "I" OESCpla•;,.N SEE 130E�5N0 PIPS .' i16T N M NV[ OIL] w T1 16P6S T 01/n INO 0' -0\1 671-I4-071-1 iC-00 .N .00 ''M 010 ALAg illla KENUS&IS ��E•yyPupjp�� 6LTI►U 1MOO 070-00oi 621-I90-072-7 n., nA " l � 0M�O10N�I1INIEp-01�A1�E OE:�''0 E AA[[EM T000L�O MII1RIIEWOK MEW 00K NM IT•NI.71 UKIV O-W-L VON TPL TEY 71.7E ("WIN) ASK -;Qv0UI11I� tT •C uINKE. Anew IMMIIN Pf /K NOW 0L0K M in .E01 no ERMIIO� IV11 1—.— -. • -- Nr Ofa 1W +ECI'�t�ir}�. lOK1 A\ft}�A/ 7fw1 a'i�ii AII•I11 •e 77-t t]'O .•'S ��:LI�tf���plfvylgrK��NII'IIp�JI� �11��'1 tt iirh I�M t0{kIIRXI11n1A11� MMNO� ISSESSP(WI-1 E rOM NE TEAL 77a8 1rMM17/) -- 04V ):MO/ ASSME. AWg70. DOMPTIWI " tlA an? M LAIC fit 11, OM poor r'.crilpl!. W. l0 :iyppprrr���l1 MOO 11f:14, 121-11C.071-3 aMIAll \.. a ,I't111% 41-1 -MKE "M.7�7 W COrYY A,_S 0 WFSSOIS ' M "Eq+1 _LW ltwo E7�.�a1 ut-1N-17.-. un a7 7l�ppyYEy�tOi�E�OEfElti�i�rfE[ MIT IT SO��� n EAM "a I�I[M(N� $1,,n 100E Workt] 01"OVSK mthm C i it Eloll �MII.! Y:. O'f1 4tl-ItO-/n-S an a:f :� Yt�/ C "'A' 11 pp ME " IA V Mo.El00Et1M,144Or! UkfIW =�1Er . , Ora L. ■n 7WI ►014 WaD ra. qua . u UK COME :Amlvfl IIR l 11,70 4040 0 -N1 VI 1f1-171-0 l0n a`f -OO YC IOIE �Y'OE 1131O 19 16113 IV! � E. /�O M7�_1'1 RrMf1-el:a an a1 tEJEr �0M 'fA�p[ER110E 12EE,7E p�lOM((!N� 7RfY770`.IfltlWS9 1614 rrrill.rr 0-01-77 alum ".IEEE Ott Ill TEAM 77.71 lOMf17E1 PAN um 0Or ear KICIPT U1 pi SM may a LM OH Sry KM PW EEEr7EOM or 71 IMM 17i-1/1-171-I M/ ROD lt��E� � �* f-NI tl 7C E-N OWAS&Wrs" 9" w 31M 17-01-1.7 H11Sf.tS7-BOIL TM TA TIAI 77-71 InS.T214) T1:2 its" Asumt. IGmm.:IKSi.TIWI T. TN AL..T K LAIC Ps 1[A MO. ETV.';:" it, 1, 4M[. ppplpl(0(OCLfLf'IA ,K00 1A:041 QI-M-171-1 ZWO 73" ,-A �Op.it�■POW"WE Tall CC 6 1Irls �M TCe�Lt7IXOlfr1�T![[ OfE7NC -. ."Itt¢ /OO KTTVM CNIILC.%��S�O11 '7]N f7�_17' �2t-1/1-on-f On .l1 CA m :OK n CO.T[T1SR I.rSSf 14,76 y[ 11ry�O116�T;ikIOF7p Ip,WvKWAAAW W�ffOON Wi A"tf:[ T 1 e75_NI Lit-1f1-M1-f / 10 tOn O7_ /7 A �ft-WY[[ ilbi) el:.y tl[ r7'm Olw plalz gifiei! lL lV f�L1L1� }�RI o7f {f L21-2M-Oe]-. im WIS SCL �L2ot.TG 1S0�IL ITC[i / O mu wCaa iTWC.C71�7(. -LL11 12� n 00�2(,72 to Alm lit C9 /7�_I{f L21-204-004 /1 I«q �.NL �■pn�Llf�p1 �ry22�OL7 /O7L, �72 114 2i! T[r'Otl[lTnlpT�WFf10tl%LN wY-liM. O741-77 twr.ln-SOIL fill TW ttw 77-71 lNnlg712 "a um t/omm Ste. BOIP"OS IT TY AIM NO LASS SN I,T ite ANNA tYA me I[. rt M,Y n WSI V"f M-1«-11ab In% two �t S t UT 1-TI R IO vAlm 0.49 Am Pub• lat'"A I 620-18 620-,7'8A T R. A. 7527 OA1F Mo. ,1fMM tb.me tY'e� • • n» POR. SE114 SEC. 5, 1-55, R.6E. � N M. 9 69//b -29 Tiod Mo. 4115 g A .4000S7 /97/ �',pA0ll 1 sac ;. 01tao i c6D[ p°t mIt CoYYI..KE -4 Ay��u+ae Taco ql. S INt IY i`A.A Y,•,.. .,i YUYO;N (ls'1 . 11It0 A'Y-111 .N•Nf•IN•t ISN Ism ..LL �x PYtt r E T+YCE MIT I.:t C,M 1AYby 111^ 'qC• HII { IY1 IY JAE rct 1•r-1 •. :I. _yl t0 e1Y:6}T {70-bf-cn.-1 0• ISfe um *� IOA."ti° t uK TT CMETAKE 1-02 0.-:1 Y �C .N N Mf•ii0 TESC, Y11S S IN, IY �S�yf per :,9• MO�Y4St 1tlS3•p.13 I!12/ ° NC'733-007-. 't:Yi' Ism cLOT I o ECW O�Ss�I1 CCLLO Do 1 Ulf[ LTV Cg"TYCE �42 r3 1 qyf( sCls1.6E 11, n •EdYOrf111. ,M(t .II] s IY* IY MI( •rt ; DE 'af• sMl.t.p1 E. An sY_lf fOtON 4126 OIX W-m Oq•s jUN Do f.»10 1p4.m19nq;;lwt IRA 01f1f. 0i/11 UK G a,W A• ISMW10I0 TH-T HIS 1 IY, li .EYY•'M.w aAa si }.' .7-11-i1 .INNYLW-41ILL IM TONE TEAM nos IM%ME):U MAX $1711 4`E ELEWSM C TE ABUSKE. ADM , USEMIETIOY r: 1.A AWT NO LAND STS TIV IEM No EEEY lm YEl TI �' Yw��}i� Ss S,EfrY`MTO 57 i{120 C1S:Y�� St1-713-OIf-O C V ISM Is YR tU ;C VIKIE I �1 .6I'1 C�a101 IIMjtl m,flf INACT fi1S O IYI IY EAOY 1I UK tll. fcrTr WAKE 1C■/i 1 &-ts3-011-1 ° E-Yt IH Hl I K TT 101 0./11 lD Ys 1r W/oil TUCT YI11 1 IYi IN d AfOff/ cs 17N tts. all w CLW OE TCt» I1s:02• u1-283-w-4 0 11 50 fti1. NO � » SKI HOItl CT qM� !/ AWN Mt I� W /111 tYCT .�.wY sf� ,�W °�11 W-W ^u•I »f .» Ms w3 1 y► (>•�I p IA.. ME01176 + sN MtTCC fU.�.TA1�rYL � wnu ISY. 11!'p 13; wsiD4.Ts .N:4 a/r.pE) A20.212.0,4.4 UT. Aku l$a/CIO ]fact ,115 A I0T I0 Ili IJK C00[ r: rq -!Sr.r7 Sri AM(33'Ekl'ICIL EM TK IE40 77-71 ols2TO) Jl- 1 f111) A%EOSEF. AC"IE%. C41CgpTICN 1, IM 49"1 K LAND ITI 7l1 IEM PICA, [KIM (Om act T pls'Y K`tS - SO%NL 7)74 071.017 420.m-011-O 12n Off •t i0.11E45TAdglf )IiN Agf #E 0 cOWEYNCE 14160 Ti I�O/ 16III10'010 t4ACT qi1 l IYt IN 011O1i�YICEI! P. WI LUCIIE912 11420 OIS_0}1 ft0-i7.ON-4 ISJO )7S I ' S" !`1IYI�'� 0 10 2105 •1 N147 MAIp0/ tt Ip4 tY OElE1O)i7'4LMKVANa 4410241T/1N LOT 21W4126Y ,110 TMCT 413 l In IY illtl��Ca0 NOTTylE7�171. I6120 4,11 7:�17 Ae/-20-01-1 IS)0 An SONS ',wj 0/ lye .IM CQ, N CCa ONi7f 1717, WW.#10 TRACT .I15 l 14Y IM EID&IM [' TL7M ll:"7 AN-M)-042-) I!)0 u1 N 17% I��YEUMINO�jyJ�. DO )N.414L1J 0 N ).t p�s���f f17�O1R[! 'J[ COr r CrTEYYCE 0O131 07/15 L07 iF I� 001111 Tpct 11:) t IN, 1M ClwOpl 4t�iTY E' 4120 01:077 6-2/7-02-0 IbM �. P CC�IKp,,[ � 0 04 ISM '� It R4• C0MTlKE Nflq M:?6 td7 tli 1� ffM 00/116 TOWN 4116 l 1MT IN O� NOW 111701 imAimumm, lPT1M� *1 TC e. O WNI.TIM 11177 r )1121MW W7) *to a it 10 Ur AIWSWVT-OCLL fOl TK TEAA 77.71 (°41Rt71) 14i[ M7e � rr1 TO4 "M 10 LAIC STl 71% no NCI E11A710M mat is 7COO071:47 AM.M3-4N-C ism W aa'3_ WA0 acc Eow1t016 it cn. I'. ism MEMc a nT- 0 wa ftSU 011-//7 •a,, ,. :..Milt ' ivi 'RW`�NL1DY DI A:iADca it �a�1{{ .. .9E CD;E { CONrtTl7rt( Was OW? I .. l 1 711AV"'H!! 69,016 1141 till / 10 IN n� i RR a �cR�l�:,, xc F.w{r0AN;' 1{Ai o'1-�1' ue-7t7'0.7-7 IJJ9 I1), ANN 77777 C'IIIyToll T. c0 vt,,Kt WIA At, O O C0 tl'11� W/010 IUCT .]IS A I"1 IN v Cmdr RIU� � G W Ciil[y lit irl rcUA 071_'tl W-t/7-ou-t II" .n ,117Y10fypf O C 'Y 0 0E T{ C" COM1UCE Ilan PA �LppI ��IJ 1,t p�9:010 tUti tiia l IY IN x Cd,NOY ApE"! d n rum(( �F. 1S076 01:,17 ft0-lSt-O..-♦ ISMNO A!T Cjj 1a11C 1} C ° o 11 R CECC,IICE D� ��77���� R/T YU 'JSE rr CACMEVANCt Ma 07,7. R CC LMICY COT tl.ARU A ON1010 11"Ci 1116 t IYI I4 _ r�-wry IfLAI�TIQI! 07-01-77 AUFSSREn-ICLL RR THE YEAR 77.70 CrIPW2700 M- .c sins AOSEUEE. Aa` "% DASUIrT10N E9 1NA ASWT U LAND 511 11r PE45 SUS E)OW-lab NET TC a G• 7974 On:077 LN-M-OU-S ISM f10 IM. r 1 ■/ R'a M144m 1C 0 Doff 1 917" R T CN J[ M T"SCE IOU91 09,75 war I1T tU Ib 'l TRACT .IIS E IH1 IN fCTayt���l UR1 Nl r. Tl.70 0n::e7 174-212-0U-6 ISM sn rr p S)[y pI a CO n0n N !11 tN► 1S T T LI "I "TV U C w C AWVA11U 0119074 07,75 as W tU Ib wg10 TUCT "IIS t 1NT IH Ca11M At(UEMlP9161(14 [1yE� 0♦ F.... .5.117 Lt0-283-0I-1 1130 Wi y1 � =" EMKrTA1St HOLD 11,:, 0 Oia 1I' Yt IU w,n0 TWO N1U t tin IN CII� IfY A Tcx. EH:027 it0-to-Ut-9 IW Ya Vt 1790 s.1 NK-�_®®®! ___ otwM twtE n,n "IL" Wo 4116 A In Is ' if{• T/in 01It7 LE0-11i-007.0 Im IM1 IA11 W' ism HA 192 III Awl r !{M�y Mi\;• ; {1991 OY-471 p0.711-01'f 7777 :{S Ca/N;{ N�L'.l.ie: ' Ltry 're U[ C00.#O"'"IOM IT\M(E O7N19 07:.'9 L01 IC N_a b r9 010 70a( Il0 1 IN IM caMleM . i[M k MILLIM A. M ;cw%ltn • U412 ^`I-O71 1 up-ltl-0)1-{ 7777 NI CE 7f-/10M2 Cp IMMET -LAN :a uFi CMMCLLr OrL:OMV[TM([ M NHi9 EC IM a MICIO la{(1 .115 1 IMI IN M �M7�II 43A /71_1I1 670-711-039-7 73.9 M T R ! I III[ Tr C COt7ETM(E 1611 M,It lJ I{b 7 W/010 MET 911b 1 IV :% u4-C..rr -•,-•' asElNSMT-COIL FOR 1,AE YEAR 17-111 (MM ITS) 7{1E III-," /MEam +HIES, xvillp110M E'i 11{ IYMI MO LAIC STI 'IV N,14 Mao EAE9rlicas [Alm 6 TPA,,1 0:007 u0-1e2-/01-5 15m SEA 796 ILI MI 75 S f12/t IMmwtvma c34135 a(,n 1.9 /MMU TM[T Ali$ 1 IN, IN ;a;iilt 44 1IVi;yaI FE wW-WN 06171 gol-lo /elf TRACT 4115 f IMl IN ♦%IT {I] I l TIN* G$-Oti u0-t11.003-' 1.,1 0- rE TMEE T A IIr77 Ul In f eYqu TyCT alb 1 SIR it ilk 01(Y!� L Ic 070 �1 uO-lU-c0.-1 1471 eK MI A71l7 K CiORn u In Ar7e If rm IS/fN IIKt *Its C 111i IM /A IIRaWM }/�L .7 IC f 1-N7 u1-ip-fM-9 1971 sis Nu{0 um 1.71 1971 MCA PAR K 1932 INS? I'm S432 19!2 5 . T TFC2/ C71:CO2' 620-2u'02l-5 1777 N0 E W[ C RA1 COA.h{t IoON 12175 LOT 193 XS 069 010 100 •1'1 t I., IN LpOPMOOM AMS EtA&A KC T1N1 07I:Oa1 620-232-02,4 1377 1UN MA AET J. 4 ■IT 072LASYCAhk IT 0166 W[ COOE"{1C COMIEYAMCE EIf]91 46,74 `� 1!1 1\ 10,010 TRACT 4116 5 IV? b' )OEM NEA. ILLO A[ i7922 L Op T124071:027 NO-212-025-7 1377 610 USE C AE ONVEYANCE OS6132 01'79 0 06 Liaas.1n.0691010 TRACT 4115 E 111 IM M4- I 9'JTET 192" W wovy60EM NAIR EEn L -AVfXI+ i 1:' y�E1 IH+ 01 tAyM LEA sm CXI :AVE ::OOF�Mcv ARE" XOY I150 fli Pli pE� 'TTE�,AI4%- 'LJES[ }:yWA[y1X CMS Y[tl AAM-NrY. 07-01-77 ASSESSMEMT-001.1. EN 1WE YEN 77.71 (AnN9270) PAIR $1711 AW55EE. A>OAEW, DESCRIPTION PY 71A ASXNT MO -AND SIR T% PENS 420P EMEWTIOM WT TI -Gk561AI U AEMI(iX 6. -�501 070b:00027 N0-212-026-1 IAl 750 212} Yrr C[ COMMOM DR 9A53 CALF YlijW2M.{"(0L LAZE A71 (0My[TAMCE 4005 2,79 LOCn A19 K 1014 TRACT 4116 A IMT IM I OIpt 4.T6120 1(M1E� 070:000` 626-2E2-027-9 1510 .U�[�pC iYMll f. kLERit 1 MIT 00 uE i0�[ 6En oil CA zz}}66pp CONVEYANCE If11lA W76 LOT I9} N1 0{9,010 TMcT 9115 A IMT IM fAd YFMO. C TV" 015:0007; NO-2E2-02E-0 9 1530 525 Nick I7N YO Mn 5 92260 ` YAM[E H1046 011"S ROT 1101� W/Olv TRACT HU 0 .M1 IN 0�Y A n T1576 075:027 620-252.On-I C G OE 1194 1� � I555N2 9AIE[ 102N7 Oil}{ IIf 1M I� 0Y2010 ?MCI tli5 A 1MT IN O� EfA l0 T7976 171:02} 620-2u-0%-1 E EE 139. N0 NOM 1750 tw UPA IRA" 11103 09,n If If TAUY 1115 A III :N &NOUN 07-01-7 Allow gear 991ANli0 lk! shl ;i• `fi° �. 'ie II! \ Ifs i\ KIN; NNO; TNDN07 e01[[((yM1 L122w ,�H2 070.01J i70.21: •00l A 0 INY HI VIC 17w I'1 �' 04M°p[y1i .T COlIE M E CCM'EMONC[ ONNO HRJ LCT I]b W pp•"" Tuct 411% 1 IN, 14 N/1 7]7�10 COL�O. ,UR CA 70771 010.017 620-221 000-T CC 0E0 Iq2 h>2 MlM OMIT, CA �Sipp IAR C T1 C01Mykwt 01099J 07:71 l01 IM I� W1010 1NC1 HI! / INT IN :CERMIC7M NTTEEAMIIICCLLR 00 71121 11!_4027 120-211-007-/ C 0 HY IeA 127w '-!E C07E OinK COWEVNNCE 000107,71 101 137111.9611410 TRACT 1115 1 MY IN Tw V CLUB it7C721 yy 01J_p01 670.2/I-001-f 00 44C I!Y 1eY 1T�C OIMVAKE 01a J 171T1 m 000C Ldt IY M7 001010 TART uu S )At IN CAI AS `P. TT9NC(�� 1 11721 076.077 f20-211 -009-0 C CC IV1 1•'2 pM n CONVEYANCE WNS 04177 E11 Id7 ID 7 MON/00i TYC1 M717 1 IMl IN [�N nei-own 07-01-77 tl1ESSNE1I-10LL 204 THE YEAR 77-71 (POW270) PA; $1700 • 7L AOfi4E. AOMM, OESCIMI N E7 TO ASYNt NO LAND STR 1/'I OERS NOCa E2EW I0115 YET TO 'K T_620-211-012-0 20 0Sf07 ��TCJ CME 9A� O1 02/7! ISIS C.OT IN I! W1910 TYCT %M S Itt IM n AidyJpM 1YME13 AVE I 71126 010 011 wo-211-011-1 C ISJO LANE TM CCNK1Rf1 ��9�905R99 11M10 91/TI 1170 .H NI ES OY1009 TYCT M716 l INi IN .dNOI �Y 39 0 1a17 520-201.OU-2 1377 5, 77720 / I9Y Wc, 92971 01136417 OWN AS "&rA W IN" of" ES IN W1� YM yq n�e7 TC 1 1-1/' A20-711•olJa I7n ES,. �To OM �A M/79 s 41�J60""am 460•MEw LOT 2ARAS 10U TNOC• call"CwWEApV, rrt ♦ idt N# [11 �IPAC00[jCONFIRM LOT 213 R 000/010 T11CT ",I �y�E. IR II C9j{a SSpCRM 1t i CC1I0�O[[�fITTV UC01Rnf .df IIM I� 0Y/IIO :YCT TWT I IW1 62-09 620- /80 TC. A. 7527 oa 400' S Z SEC. 5, T. 5 S., R. 6 E. 06 I Q I o 10 Aa Po LMA- 4,81 2 _. ���6 '^ _ 525[AC 07 V/ V w e-- J �^q I 26 �t 3914 Al 16 c, ., oArc OLD Mo x[w xe. /' L �Ay� Z,� ivYc by 7ooi 9zaa� 6 CUUN7RY CLUB 7'8 ` BK MS 69110-29 TR4CT4115 62� M8 6711-8 TRACT 4181 M8 67113-37 TRACT 4182 oA rA Ns 5411, MAR. 1971 r, 4,15 ,or N-N -OZ . Tc.A. is/z SEC. 2 s 3, T. 5S., R. 6E. I *BK _ 33 34 ✓ 34 35 r 4 s. ras f4.. s l402B1 NO P (4020) I z EE I e: 53 Z 1• p J 0 OW Oy 620 rf 4 55 � b 0 �v� • ` UNTRY — — imn, do 1 w,r•.. ,e Visa$ a •.•J>I!° a/ir 06 ' R.S 34/39, 54/36 ASSESSOR'S MAP SK. 6/9 PG R/V£RS/DE COUN(Y, CALIA 4/9-OGa —003 ✓ �iXb 3q4-los--Aeo�, �a. �ao ex. -ohs / 642, r/�ay /a 13o-,e 417 /,' D_ 79SJ- ,D� ' - 9 iv 3 7 3G7/1 eaA4,t,,, 6, D,t: L ✓ (L L,r b 30 564A in (D� 75, 75' 7S' 33' 35 9A r7N 1@274&14 k,24 (D ko236A,,' 565A 290A 292A N 7s' rD-) 304,L 293 A In 2 7-3 A U-) 25(",L v2MA "q566A TA, oD tor v ry BB' Ch'? 272 A 251A o-04 -0soe @,- �i 567A -2;19 4 A 14, 774, ss.. 0302Az @, I 4568A 297A 296A 271A 4q 233A 17 @16 50 301 &, Ll Go 75' /;Ph 270A 32A 569 ��j 01% '. 10 S., 26 269A 268A @,foo 53, 1 vol 2�54 6 A 570 A 474940' 5, 0 A 291 21.94 4 2ffkA 571A -- 144' 229 A 4. 1,63A 262 261� 2rA 259A 258 12 �?26A mar y 57JA011 ?22& 223&� 224A 225A Q)Z 57-9A, A, Lor x -GREEWS 578♦, R,.575A 12 i, 4111 E 5' 590A -V. 577& 26581A 576♦ so 659♦ 568A 587A 5o86hhL a 58-4A 583 (-219 18 17576 071:117 620-292-012.6 1394 re 'max ww N• CONVEYANCE I1]f27 11,76 ;0 2b61N Obf•014 TRACT r115 6 IN1 IN OnIEM NEC65 a.e T 61LA DWIT T�i/6 071:071 620-Ift-O:l-; I]94 ITy. 0 00 DO tY�I�i �DLT N A75[ONYEUi510i4C�T7R-N r1 I N116 L=IM([1l6l1N00410 TRACT 4116 A INT IN 27 620-212-014-1 1394 179. 11576 071:000 4wtTAY6gA[[l5�� UK WE TV CC IONIC )Mqs 02 77 C 0 CA �T7244 LO iN7At16U 7010 TRACT 4115 6 IV IRA wIn CAA. L. 7•T4 071:07i 6i0-i12-OPi 1]9r 550 19.4 "M LA%YS L. TC E E RARIM05 IIAN CAL` "}y(p0 A 92672 73" DEf[Rt 022{0 UK .' M CONVEYANCE ItI131 0/ 75 T Ml 1! 0607016 TRACT 4115 6 INT IN W. COTT YEM 31- KTT 7964 071p: }71 624 292-0I6-6 1314 59/ ;qq; CIE 90036 It 0-00 RA C RA CANVETANCE 114656 01714 lA 2NANYAO69,010 TRACT 4115 7 IV7 IN `ONNDM 0[ 7 4n--tb •• 4 TYd-Cb`44 Iw 760 `M •• •• •• APa M t%,-NULL YUY INA. TEIR 77.79 11AMN2741 PAW. SIT% AME.MEE. 6604M DESCRIPTION EV IRA ISIINT NO LAND 371 1" Kos PMP EEENPTIM NE All �0jNCa OE T6S76 OTT 620-292-017-1 IN4 I. C 0 G0 ``''�� ) y`2265 I,SC YY COWTEMYCVE 0�7996 07,72 l N 6 NS K91010 TRACT 4116 S INT 11 fdP 10N AR[N yyC. T`120 010 077 620-297-011-I ISJO 1; E C A 7 AIRT Itf �2666 t� A CDMTYIEE 201991 12176 1l0 1f6 1� /M/Sq TUC, 9114 S m IN RR[114'ypOEwTE i7M w T{I70 OIO:OIt 621-297-111 •J 1530 U C 44 m COMIAM Mi176 0176 47-61-77 Aloes, V M.. YYw VY. WYY.. . ...PVvpr 0`-01-77 05ESSMENT-ROIL 90R I YEAR 77-71 (PRPA270) PALS 0172% 22EE AM SUE. RCAESS, DESM01I04 9V Itt AM, No LAND Olt TIV PERS P" EMEMTI X NET IC Cn1IEM fiAMtIECM 1C 56 070-,21 aM-192-0014 133600 I101 1 .0 189 PIT FRANK C INItjE�M C E DR .;1 ol)^f�1EaP30011A1.^6 JR f2260 Az 79 OI p./iNfIMEYAMCE 00106P t6/U CC 5bair91010 10A:1 1115 l lMT I♦ PIT MT COA A PVE U 750 T53M 07A_027 '20.292-006-3 1339 JSE n o CAMS N7I 03177 0 C044 LOT _M_N_011410 TRACT U15 A IMT IN STIR R. ICE 0770_i201 620-292.009-4 1339 l E 2Ny ��'Nl9 SM YAKE Hu 01/11 1. 0Y/010 TRACT 4119 A IV IN L A: ii Q7b_00721 W-M2-010-. I331 'PIt t$356 LOOMI A CONjTNt� CRCONYEYAKE 4779] USE 02177 lD aS M1/OIO tSAa H15 t IMl IN [llMpl M�M OC M 0 D_07 1 120-M2-011-5 1339 V � I00 �6P((PA 9M M Yl .OYVETYCE 2 0%,73 W7 m_5-W0 010 TACT NIO t IV IN StRIPTIA 1TXv film 1331 1 IM I 1339 1 13" 1 ASSESSPENI-NLL PA TK YEAR 77-71 (PAPNE270) PACE t1725 fY INA AM so LAND Ito TIV PENS PROP EIENPTNMt NEI 11 1C 76 01_127 AM-M -012.0 IM. MO NOT 17M 1N 0741-17 ASSESIEE. ADAE55, MCA: UO UNIT .115 A E. TRACT .115 A Atli m i miI ON COW-YAKE 911.01f/Nt TNIT .Its A T1, A CSNYFTAKE 2Nt of SYltlt TACT •115 A LOT h7j Otf/0I0 TN;T .116 a \7-0147 NRtsKi. momw R55Uf. I� � ..9lww tAHR 50r i uf4 I.4-10A. 07 1 Q1-7/f-671.1 IN. 1 c1!`YI,OVfSI:OYaEYIYa EEtEl7 6J/i{ ;.A �K Mf CIAiN;1 .I if { 1., Ir IN4 07-01-77 fllEffMFMT-11OEI F04 IMF TE01 77.11 (E1a0771) aft N7:: A95C U. f'JME1 . pFxv fO0TtyO11 FY Tl{ 0"1 10 If MC 311PUP.0T IN "A /E3EIC16 1EI IC SySyfy��MMM!/{��ET fw T�-. 071.0E1 u0-E12-1ti-i AA E0E0 139. Y IN4 IC1..(]ILCOMYCTf10E UK al,ugl 0M7 M M1 601114 TMCY 4111 F I1T IM F Y K11 OYM0M L LLMII C tTWE CIE �7E0 Etitli I3/7I Ilf7{ CC 01f_OI1 i20-NE-023-6 G0 0000 1m IN. l 0{1nu MCI till t IMT IM COMndI VINC�E J. -- -- 012 It 010- 7 uO-M-O»-7 E1 f-7 IJ34 Nf May . O11f SIR A tYK[ 1241N 0]/1{ #� w ffi 1� W1011 MCI 4111 l IMT CY Cw� I�� �j Tt !f 0 O_EQ1 u0-tf3-0if-F 1394 IN4 t0; IT CIITEWTfKE fltf7fl 44,76 Uf 1L wl0ll TOO 4111 0 IM1 IM ■/11 �t CFn 07E T-0f7 {70-fl7-07{-. 1437 325 If07 E044 0 T ffF 4i 11N7 tfRF It37:0 ISM U1 L0 A♦ "1110 TOCT flll t I0T 11 ��j�t�N:p n11 0"Y -�11.• i --CM ]�EfF1.lgqwcc :C.'•EM•IiOMJf spear M 11710 1771.77 NKOW0T•Ru lot IN[TEY T7.71 (M ilo) MR ►1,34 SST-O-T flow RI 10 mom massry TM Mlwl 10 1011 171 1/Y am"W timim w TO 1� «.. ffWf • C PAt NT» 1f /w O71 IUM MY 70 HI, a1T'`i2nM�ffl»((h ,� 71w2 M [ M (L1fY[NY[t INig i1�72 [CRT„ S p1�6t0 TpCr \III l lY) IY TIBI UNIT 00-212.026-1 IN2 N0 07-11 1' All II Y.IM TN TEAS 77-71 (Pow*;#) "-A 117n ASSES[I. ACCI[AS, CESCI1171M IV 1» AS11• Ap LAIV I.6 71'11IY MP [NEW ICN N''. 4•IL 61n 17�:/27 6n-HI-1P-e :\ii 1.12 �]f»l T� 41[ `1 66 N[. finu I7177 !6_A4.401614 TMCT 4SI1 a 1At IN . 00Y T .. T ITL4. sIn 67yy-o}}r 6:o-H2-nn-1 TC 1-e0 1.72 •,;� 1 ' ,a2tlM v >< CI O 1. CAI». '[nn[nNL aE cE6[ n 16316. 1e176 CC ni w16te Tp[T q16 6 IYf IY 0 Y1W1Ty T•Y. TC7n 11 127 6H-H2-0H-2 Iw 1.12 RR 1.Y\1TMI /1 C6 »2p SAE CM n CLW[76NE 1»fT7 12176 .T AS /010 TRACT 4116 a Ifr IN YICIY IA 1. 1. 176-p1 6n-n2-0]14 I.R 7.y A, 1 0 IQE !3266 C7n0- z 0"Pa UKW COMYAKI » 03,77 MLY�tl.'e11 TWT 1115 A IMi 11 71n e :91 620-n2-031-1 14M 3" I?w m1± �1� S12MI Rr,ra, oe! ^6 ( n1J Nf/07e TRACT 6111 a 117 IN Y0N•Mw J 07-01-77 ASKIMM-TILL TON TN TEAS 77.7e E100In6 Ml 4s OMONtr Asm IMIn10I I1 T16 MITI! s0 LIr oil Iry [p 1r aw"m up TO C 11Ira W-A we-m-ow wwoIts I/6�N N1 »Y77 ,11 MAI1110"m =I 4316 1111I IN W 77 IN-M-0/{-] INO 1:1/a I �TT �N 1 N �1 IAMf N171 M1 �100 9,014 TNCI 4110 1 IV, IN ^:Ui.]N: N,[ '• Tf111 11:OD An-M.01id Dad •A 0 ew iN /17N i•-.k-1 pf7 COMrEUK[ I/7/0% 07,76 a�04 0N,41f 14t1 4416 a ITT is ' :. I'AC+ =14 try 09-Ot• 624-t1l-001•0 1717 / !0 3 14ATI[p4 c r[ ti M y� MOIL I'; Ila1M 68r70 IT l • ,$:$ TNCT T1101 INT It IITIOI 0]iN^ tcj�frl��. rp01 0!f_,1: W-OE]-11f-1 1577 C 1 0 0 M �0a0� K CPIRTNQ 11M I117! 1IA72-R_w1f11 TUC, Olio a IN IN Ia V. I f rv.] 171- ta^ I hew-ONrs � I "a bill- 17-11-77 NapaMEl1T-mu TO 714 TEN 77.78 10Om271) Na &I'm ] +VCi wT TC yN!¢. AQDK3$, 9E0CNIPI:;% TV IN UNIT NE WO aTa Tr'I it" A! t]fj = vT ,t lax T T I' It1E1 N7f:1a, 1N-1'/]-111.7 // 1100 r 1aN {yy COIL 11 at Na[ -NrT T „}y A I TV CpMOtra6E ION1107,76 8 a -a Ir Wr110 TNCT 111a a INT IT fAOV hl EY•6.EMEN1a LL wl N WWV ism 07a:,a7 q0-tf]-011-4 0 1717 INI 2.17 IWI C7ailrf- , 97112 f720/ m N row,NQ 11177711 12,76 cCiNY�T 01. mil►1� loll TNO *M a to IN C N I�4Tia ,. IC 7a 0-177 Ntl-n]-01rf 011 1717 NO HIM 17 A/ V . AC WWE,NC[ 131139 17177 UT Uaf0[M 1� 1014 TNCT ills a INT IN f!b All {HT 0 T N Ia1N 11:e}7 aN-N]•01]-0 1717 1•V 1 // NI[ E [OMOyC[ ININ Nr7! TNCT bill, E ITIT to war � Hl yy nq} 610-20'1IT-1 1717 0T7 V i t 'A 40.1eRM101�r UHI N.(( M f00t0 �f�iC00Nt1MR[ �/i1�0 N') '..CT ,4 .0 10101e MACI .Ile l I41 IN CNN N MU 0 Lff 0 N CITNCNTIi / : VAi OOR Yr tpHlrlNCE ��7fM 07/71 l01 117ARAONlew nKT .115 1 INt Ir Ir" 01:117 624-,1,-011.1 1717 041-77 OM(S►NEAII-TOLL ]OS THE YEAR T7-71 (0YR274) NZ 0'. 717 00RENU4 IOMW, KURIO110N to IRA ,SAINT AL LAN S-e Tot 0s" IRW Extw-iCNs RE' •C N . N H I�170 I7 MO-R1Ole ,--i Isle 1ss0 Y 0[YlsstKl pEL. ,,1e 44 1010 CONVITA CE 3p71R M176 R-g-wisle TRACT N115 1 Itl IN TC 0I_eit MI-29)-11{-3 Isn tsn v v ltt �077���� 1 YErsr[E Us O77n twT Mis s INT IN t• IA M 07,.Ot7 670-711-017-0 I7II 1+1� CCONTErAMM IS1716 M176 10 TRACT 0115 A 1N1 IN �6-%01g. W-,/)-Ots-s lMN taT 1-N N/11�7�1�11, ��j,,psp•IO ,V[ sjjo fLLD 001� t�7YeNN,Of,-'Y7,1 t,1,O 11[�T YCCOOOOI jW1#v TUCW,CC,Its S TNT IN S; V IN,T 7f170 Ot�:1i1 021-713-Ole-6 1330 1s4 ,aR //!e M $2" M TRACE II1NM 04,76 tM WAr/e10 loci 010 a INT IN A7,•n MMOIOOT-ULL to IN RUN 77.10 (/M M) am bm % Alm. WRIVTIRN IN IY um r Lr s" Its Ir sm wor1e MIT :•�Tc fly 511I9 »f) m7 im m 17M Sf7 jl. N+n19 ;r+0,(f .. •trM 011_I): 17/.7,)-1, 1.0 If7• o.nu cu ; E 11 1A0 1datN! 'Aff ++,NE11 1; 14tC wt^ t`I�E 1OM9E'WIT097.4M4,7 12,76 5E i _0 lOia«yy[[Nf 416 TNCT 4110 0 IM7 IN 6>OiWi0i4N91CU11M[ C, t1171 O1f.p17 IM•EfE-Olf-. 15M T`/ >)V: l N 1•(( C // //70 % [1� a 1E650 .�E L Mf01MT.KE 117907 00/76 �C 5t7a a00!/011 TNCT 4116 E IMT IN 0"CM 1 ur. -ON.r 07-01-77 yg5KV-ULL F04 1ME YEAR'! y (POW276) Nf WIN '. WEMSEE. +0011455, SEKOI+IION EY 14+ "MY NQ LUC ST5 t/'1 ARM ffp ENEW"" NET IC W nL KI 1 A. W T 7 071l_077 670-7f}070-> I170 .-- 15,7y :. 7 C 'TV OAK C+YAK,_ p Et1:97 t1I70 Q0 VSE ( 15/77 L N] 00410 TNCT q15 CdM�CA 5R 5 IN, IN 5:AIRIE t`I)1 5l?_�77 670-r}eti-7 73k y0 5 C 1 AVE 0L�5 +dSM ^,K p 000E YT ItYSKE 1�)14 17/,5 l 5N 1� lvlf TNCT 4115 CANEIM 5 INI IN row 0 57f_/:� 071-if}E7:-5 15N 755 JIMMY` 79170 90416 I��j 5N rYC[ 07261 lln= LD7 NSa $69 /Op TUC- H15 5 INT IN ,C WO-715-9E3-9 E C ISM ARO 41 17U 30 1 MyKYODo KE IONLL OVry LL 5U M/f10 TRACI 4115 A 0mEw 5 IV IN / 015.OE7 M-AS-W-f Ism 551 EAR5 asY14! II +OWN 107U C 15 E040 �5y p5 �l[ ( /!you I71N010/10 0L Y7WIM TUCT 41I5 5 IV 14 Ns77/) MY 617" 1 1 474147 f!MlWr4AU 005 INE YEAR 17.75 (f51. m) f5K 107% Oil" IMLI 11 M � M11 O M Ittt 1-IN-M-M ALI ovoi1 -1 Y M LL amiam !1 a" ' It% 1111 w iwm It, At NOl l01l'M3f 'am 7111101 111141f *ft (011AWN) 4-L4 FL TL N0 I'M-LI131m]M u-IFLo NI Al 1 Ill. LIM 011/0j =I'ii w aril )!fife 3TlU3uq; M III K:1 NOD ILL Ksl 0p1 pp I-SP/-itl-M a1-S10 .1i6, �A�fJI� M �uil�lgif` MM it At 1 �yN 1p)�0 Ill. 13111 MIA IN LOt 4(r10 M{i�1 3SIN03Nq] nl{ )Qp'7 3�1 /R) ml op Y-tle-cel-M L20-9L0 Kid;) LS L 3YOW NI Al I SI IY USlL MAIN" tL/f1 ftfLU 31I11N3M/3 t l_ot 77 MIIf � �r{ )K O[ii C-1i0-iSt-M lL�-�1 MPtI NI !NI 1 �i�yf IgNIp) {Ih Otlt IIIIYN Y NI !11 I1r10 CtGH1 37uIa>A� u ?rW 7f1 )MI MI P-It/-cu-61/ Li ll oP171 All O/tif p c.., ulll(MIIl131ipJ130.�NYl__ 'iW�LM NI 1Nt 1 NNpWi3�: SIN ❑Sll OIOr{I0 )Cl c to Pilot 31NMAY4] 3(r) 3w. 9K Ot:t NOr M HIT o e I-fio-ta-M 1�/-f(1 OPSII fWef lid Ic Cl37r LLIN1 i3NiNiC I'` e! Slf:..Y3V 4k Slid Lr/ Ili :)ill 3% LIIISl Ill 'f WIl.1OS3f 'SSIM '33SS3Sl1 IUIS Zu (ILL,/00) 1I-" I13t 301 let lift -Alder It1 :L-W-:o ,1 LNI 1 n1Y Hill on/tli�L�7i31Y1-i 1')Ilip3_ I Mill 33NtIA I f.{ MI 1•Sl1i{t•DLr :2��10 ue7l Mgt Y, onle 74�NA wW 1111 It a} INOILAIM LW MY 1./t Mill }16 (ILIM Yell IAI M "it lop l iN SNfi. a3t1 .'i; S-.. A a,. r011rim, it, i Nllf U[ ku liM f7!`I EOOEw r [p�nn[SigL plruytxt !I: U i�aa .ei�.10: aCiliiliw�N[ iM[�aM .x CE[ r,1 a�(vvIr WE SL 1Ii�� Iyt (,• 1.41 075_jb7 VI-iH-NI 1 ;:Sa fy !o!4a5[fCf l>!Iq Ix[AS![350R HIS / C 0. VALi TERE7S:051 621 IH-00.11 •250 HSi ItM NO t. V 11R �f Y f 17 C O(-,T: A R[e• 57i T a INU AIM, 15 All iaa�TlT�Xf:f�T ip If[EaRtltfRORIxTM EI�E,iS�RRLpy�I�i� 1 pFM1Fa Sy 9 Pal Gj-? 1 .11-UI-StO-! -M •r}] JSL CC{[i�y�1ry[P1yMEyou �[LU!�Sa7 1122[,T1 1 !0 [. rla oCS' IN 'm TE!RC YSCRC IITLdI![ )WR -m 1"v r.. :•' w O Yev r.. AE :ri% Y. 1.96AT YCKS •+' - r11ti -L40 k.• a/ riMJ v�R' ! In" �I7771n f'dTMF��ta IR.p .E ':x aRtl Rd2a NES'Rr .;r 4. I. C ^ J i SCE » v C• 61 M:, 35•Er LL 1 14'Ea 77-'1 V4w.2:S1 AAA $ll: 1 I::aES3. CESCRIITl[b E'1 'U ,5•R. %- 1\; Sig PEN Yap ECEs IM IV `C �.IICT KLLEE '. .� ECR ff :b1CT a O[E" tlT {- o 076-Si5 641-120-011-( :HE rw RR r [�apS Si2E1T�lI LffiipEi ilktlpp'�RCC�OETAKE JM. S R tl ■■M1 SSEL��SO��i61 06F AbxSxLr 15 bralau.YiifiEC 212• i. SSR 171-t S 6)' '".-C;•• 50 1100 2'1. � :•< a • ri41 ttf)Y, "o-O 1 S. an IEv ff0b 7�2Eg1�1�1��R� IORJ I"d Nrii �.�2RWAI I�vaxE SE Co1 �SIr II1b Id fC11I* IdIII avmic S0R mpg a r T a1K11 f12T6 07b:01s 41-IH•111•. boo Ib21 IT"rCr l7/ Nil 7 ►iE TCC i0 00 1122162_:TRJR PEST TO � jt�[ �G I�;K--FJINLviKt N2V2111i1 7°2` � 1�1�iCtlLi .I�1{i xi YltlK� i. WIo 11,NW xl•121-41" Isis 1�IR Y ... 170 »'S 7C R11tt m•1 WIN ,w MLO 1=1 NE -NI AM M 1!Y or Kc 7 TM i 0--01-E- rSESaEE. 1 r•l N J 4bbpbAEli-.AL'34 lyE TAD :7-:1 AbbilSEE. AC21E55. OE![A Ie110! IAA "ON, No A!: $14 1i'i PEAS AK • WALLA tOM1I�1 {pME •. 170C It 621.120.017.6 A7! 6'6 1iyyJ(l PiSI' CI``IT 76 fa11Y[TAK[ 1337.0 CC /0 .11E CC]t +W 11 66 1�p IALL, NEW 1.:4 ))17o0 07S-os2 621-120-ate-7 IC 1/7 ASK x. I w ft'S WILL, "Nl�[ L. Ilil WALLA, Ip A AIC CEL SOL <-00 NKMC ! Xl -1 TIF: J# COOE 01 C& ElAKE Pu 1711 + . Iu�Er 7 as ,onL �AAE C[3C1 • 71IN D A r.q K PALANO AIMS E t 7 j'IE �2s2 O7/-00! 621-120-OI9-1 7125 ']i 6[1 rii AtLIS LI1 dtCMPAN E /4 IM1l PEST )10 lw CODE!4 EEIA%E ppffIlDN�E07 pp�� 4.T1 f!t 1i1LtoEKitiild•SEE AE�E77 1OOS --------------------- �' 1537 IAOIlO INIIIEn E. '.544 M-076 621-126-02C t 1s62s ISd<5 [LEAD .MPx��1� 0-4 IA1ii N��(((jil'y,tlll�I�E N(IT o I+��WL�ptsldYlES MCl OO;sib '! uE ;1 C10aDCgpyO[ESWC2IP7to+t16FEL''�70yY 16 flCppj 1.7. 41C�UpMEOys 7} ;2i-IN-i21-9 TLNC 41045 1t3 btil +L. a4 T31 oeC 1. 0.005 C, Iwb17�ty�1t2n2 �55!„C EO A(IEE KP'C�EEYY!'KE yE '�A[i i0T1iDC[sjik•�t, YEE'+ Es101' ARE ICJ !i. 620 2:0 E{1'0 hR .,r 1)11 1• .Ol .-. ..-.rl,Inci ^12e WE •r Oe eN lot Ntl1 lDi 19! 1'1 ONi4_ -N . f011np11 MCM A DE'AA�CLIA1LT, CON ��iL�I� i'rONv[ fO 'i t¢171 0r 1 RO-7r0-00.-1 1.17 EPEE 1•,2 11�p179AAI�E,([( It TT AN�CC tE0 E41:91 01171 MrT �IIO LC7 11♦ n OK1Kf TUC, #,IS, UK ., .KK•6NCE {O7 IM IA M9'A10 INc+ .7 0 I I[ C 7JLTI N x;• 11A3RCL50 ��i,r 1F2/ O10e:E2r 474 •:10-0E5-: 1.97 0 1. •7 C!V Y[M WE CCOE YY CgrvEnNC[ E?i;Ef 07n1 1 ; 0. VI 111 OK1K! TUC, O12/1 A �L9u ppP a^ `AMTOOKE TlD ]K�10691014 TRACT ., IOr-07-77 MSUMT11-ROLL FOR TOE YEAR 77 71 (ORPRE2?U Mg 51697 ROME, 'OOtIst. - ••,ICR TV 'IA MOOT NO LAN, SIR T19 9EU 0IOI0 EXt-7 gAEEAALL IGU NET •; O,' 17TKTCqCRA1yf11 CLUB OR T?721 O7p_It7 620-270.006-3 1432 1932 M R KBEI1 CA 00 Vet COK IF LONYEIAMCE E17939 07171 LOT :76 n 9411049 TRACT 01251 A Tr C0N NMI A2? 7t0 �p�NTRI CLUB Of 3721 071.127 620-270.007-. TC E0 -!OC 1432 ■ OEtEiI. a UK n CMETAKE xx226Rpp Ef7939 07171 LOT 111K177LLNo OKIAR9 TRACT 042SI �1T N OAS 00 I�n1 171_OEI 620-270-oat-s 70 C00 1.32 P1RaL7K�ttC00+ USE CODE rT-Q /EYMCE z26p E)1.39 07;71 LOT 1I1 U 0K10111 TRACT 19211 9E�C�(O�1NTfIy(�CL xUBC 0 %21 a76:o21 UG-270-009-6 T 1432 y CmE 9I CAYEY6/[E 22{e I. Ot171 C 0 LOT 119 U U4100 TUC? IWI B TCpN on n ,CA-1 071_Eo7 620-270-010-6 Ce 136 B�n(J[Lu IRE �9901� CONETAIKE 22{0 E'7939 er171 LOT IRA U IKim TRACT 04251 �� fpY���!j IF Us K TCN1 01E-127 620-270.011-: --1100 127 UK If '[�YWCE yyi�pp MI07171 LOT 121 U W2eK TRACT 09261 IMA1 Ik 127 TRACT 01• �1. U K OWEYANCE E TUCT III' PrT xlLLa , UK EEAIYETRNCE OILO CI�I U9 1L 9U.016 TRACT MIA C' n- P ';U AV13. E 07 2U UK wwm �BJjSIB1111 TUFT I!U ...0.O.n. r7ll-18 620-27A TF.A. 7527 Us POR. SE //4 SEC. 5, r. 26 rv,: ol r¢D' Sr•� an • /3 nano. x iS. R. 6E. -. : ® Qr n •aer : mr Y" e.a ••� ---._.-- - iv ef•ar eec sva co. sec s --t -- -- - eounrrR r - -----,CLUB---- -cc va- — -- ----- - — M8.. 68189-96 rrocl No. 4251 BK 62/ AUGUST 1971 /2 I l -�/ T CA. 7505 N2 NW 4 SEC. 7 T..5S. R.6E. 5 J 6I ee )B..a O z. k9.6 !e).6 jp,,6 Ae96 (35,40 / (40) un ee Gist, ).,.e ).,..e bye z/ � �r— ° Co w n )t • I 19 � , t O- 16 tOl N � 7 LU Q A O 0 I 9 ZQZ un1 Its, I OA TA GLO PLAT R/S 3413E ASSESSOR'S MAP BK. 62/ PO. /2 R/vERS/OE COON7Y, CALIF. SEPT 1967 C�iL,v c->t P�:Al inn �yc�tic��•1 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 4-i ay3 MH.. CA 922R0 PP:+1 DESERT John D. & Clare C. Garber a 420 S. Patencio Ln. • Palm Springs, CA 92262 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 N�eC����iccFq , G �L'COe�F qp o Lwf N W W H U W > W N Joseph W. Cacia z Loraine V. Cacia ro,' (� � z v 1205 Via La Mesa' - �: o San Clemente, CA 9267 � W C 0 //ypp//yy II 45.275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 546-0611 RCTugN ip FQ IIEyQFA ISSSEE UN kNp v d W 210 Desert Truck Sales 36711 Cathedral Canyon Dr. Cathedral City, CA 92234 to w Cl LS®IP'�i �yET UR�yf0 TO 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92280 WRITER TELEPHONE (7I4) 348-061I UNDELIVERABL, ADDRtSS"ci? Q _g W W U F W > �l N w J Charles S. & June C. Gibbs V = w a 73070 Grapevine Lo C :� zz 0 Palm Desert, CA 92260 o z U • W (�9��'owr ®:ff TP?aLTI= 1n)QP 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 24, 1978 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you that the City of Palm Desert has initiated proceed- ings to annex approximately 1050 acres of land located generally adjacent to and north of the existing City limits at the request of property owners of said territory. In accordance with its statuatory responsibilities the City has completed a pre -zoning study. To initiate a change of zone and an initial environ- mental study to determine whether a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared for the said annexation. A pre -zoning hearing has been scheduled by the City's Planning Commission on May 17, 1978, to initiate the Change of Zone upon annexation as noted on the attached legal notice. And based on the initial environmental study the City has determined that the proposed annexation will not have a signifi- cant effect on the environment. A copy of the initial study setting forth the environmental information for the finding of a Negative Declaration is available in the Department of Environmental Services at the Palm Desert City Hall. Since the proposed annexation will effect property owners of said territory, we are providing this opportunity for you to be heard on these matters prior to formal action by City officials. We would appreciate receiving any com- ments you may have by the May 17th hearing date. The recommendation of the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council for consideration on June 8, 1978. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission rk/ks 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 April 24, 1978 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF PALM DESERT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATELY 1,047 ACRES FROM 'S' STUDY TO P.C.(2) (U.A.), R-2 8,000 (8) (U.A.), R-1 12,000 (U.A.), PR-5 (U.A.), PR-4 (U.A.), O.S. (U.A.), PR-3 (U.A.), PR-10(U.A.) OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPRO- PRIATE ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE WHITEWATER CHANNEL AND BETWEEN MONTEREY ROAD AND COOK STREET. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a Planning Commission initiated Change of Zone for Pre -Zoning approximately 1,047 acres from 'S' Study to P.C.(2)(U.A.) (Plan- ned Commercial, District, Upon Annexation), R-2 8,000(8)(U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 8,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, min. 8,000 sq. ft./du, Upon Annexation), R-1 12,000 (U.A.) (Single-family Residential, 12,000 sq. ft. min. lot area, U on Annexation), PR-5(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 5 du/acre, Upon Annexation , PR-4(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 4 du/acre, Upon Annexation), O.S.(U.A.) (Open Space, Upon Annexation), PR-3(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 3 du/acre, Upon Annexation), PR-10(U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 10 du/acre, Upon Annexa- tion) or any other zone deemed appropriate on property generally located between Country Club Drive and the Whitewater Channel and between Monterey Road and Cook Street, more particularly described as: Beginning at a point in the northerly boundary line of the City of Palm Desert, County of Riverside, State of California, said point being the common ; Section, corner of Section 7 and 8, Township 5 south, Range 6 each, San Bernardino base and meridian. Said point also being in the boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage of said Riverside County. THENCE northerly along the aforementioned common Section line of Sections 7 and 8 and along the easterly boundary line of the City of Rancho Mirage, a distance of 2,652.82 feet to the common section corner of Sections 7 and 8 and Sections 5 and 6. THENCE north 89' 33' 48" east along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,629.98 feet to a point. THENCE north 89' 42' 08" east, along the northerly line of the aforementioned Section 8, a distance of 2,670.86 feet to the northeasterly corner of said Section 8 said point being the common corner of Sections 8 and 9, said point also being the centerline intersection of Portola Avenue and Country THENCE south 00' 07' 20" west, a distance of 1,325.52 feet. THENCE south 89' 48' 00" west, a distance of 1,327.45 feet THENCE south 00' 01' 50" west, a distance of 1,592.03 feet. THENCE north 76' 32' 56" west, a distance of 3,166.84 feet. THENCE north 00' 09' 12" east, a distance of 2,168.56 feet. THENCE north 89' 45' 08" east, a distance of 3,052.69 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 660.00 feet. THENCE south 89. 45' 08" west, a distance of 1,325.00 feet. THENCE north 00' 06' 40" east, a distance of 664.68 feet. THENCE south 89' 44' 27" west, a distance of 3,977.43 feet to the point of beginning. S to 2 8,000 (8)(UAJ 1 stcnox es S to P.R.-5 1 (U.A n MYrla V s]i BOfIY )L �e[s Pf-P, LPR.-10 S toR-1 12,000 M.A.J to P.R.-3 roe 61 GCP (U A) ��l px°pr[° NLY CLYRi Clil 41Y1i V L ... .. MLY Y111I11 C111 L..Il nIY o[sv, <nr u.n S to P.R.-4 W.A.) LLCLI°M IL 1 ' MtY °tlul Cln L1wr r[°o0• L L' [ j "°L cxnxY.. -1 \ 5 to , Q.J. • NLY o[,ur C", uwl (UJk) R C°Y..Y OL e,....— 7- YLSLLL Cltr LIY1, y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATELY 1,047 ACRES PRIOR TO ANNEXATION. CASE NO. C/Z 01-78 WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert has received a petition re- questing annexation from a majority of the land owners of property generally located south of Country Club Drive, east of Monterey Avenue, west of Cook Street and north of the Palm Desert City Limits as indi- cated on the attached Exhibit 'A'; and, WHEREAS, as a result of the above action the City has desig- nated the subject property indicated on the attached Exhibit 'A' as City Annexation No. 5; and, WHEREAS, it is appropriate for the City of Palm Desert to con- sider at this time the appropriate land use and zoning designations on the property comprising Annexation No. 5 in order to promote the orderly development and highest and best use of the property upon annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. A Change of Zone is hereby initiated for pre -zoning of approximately 1,047 acres comprising City Annexation No. 5 from IS, Study to various zoning designations as indicated on the attached Exhibit 'A' or any other zone deemed appropriate. 2. That the Commission does hereby direct the Secretary to establish the appropriate procedures to be adhered to in the pre - zoning process. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 28th day of February, 1978, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: OF RIVERSIDE- I S to (!i R-1 127000 W.A.) -u" -1 - I ` SECTION B SIB.B,M. ? R.- 5 1 (U.A.� i 1 s a s PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT -� COMMON SECTION CORNER J C COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JN ; V NW42'"�} PROPOSED PALM fESFRT ❑TY LIMIT -� ^c ]. on' S to 9 II jPC(2) S to WA PR.-10 W.A.) SECTION I Y S I to SECTION 9 ]-5-S, R-6-E S.B R m PR3 104 6T ACR (U n.) H o PROPOSED PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT L F � a d° 0 )4' 1 Y H 4 1I Is to 1 • LOCATION MAP NOT TiIacne_ vll I _ O.S. S to ° --- (U.A.) - PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT —� PR.-4 (U.A.) COMMON SECT CORNER , 0 0 9 C 16 I 13 •^ .- SECTION 17 0 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE '+ T-5-S,R-6-E S. B. B. M. > PALM DESERT CITY LIMIT --_y I LA.F.C:78- ' T .ilct.•1 FLOOD CONTRO S __ •. ..PRO�PO'SEDANN OCNAM .. DATE 2.1A-TB ANNEXATION NO. 5 CITY EFX S''LE6D- Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission February 28, 1978 n I L �( Page Five VIII. NEW BUSINESS (/ A. Consideration to initiate prezoning proceedings for pro- posed City Annexation No. 5 { Mr. Williams noted that a request had been received from the residents in this area to be annexed and these are the types of zoning that is proposed for the area if it is annexed. He noted that early study of zoning will alleviate a lot of future problems with regard to density, traffic, land use, etc. Chairman Berkey asked if this would allow the staff to make recommendations at the time of the public hearing. Mr. Williams noted this is the reasoning behind prezoning. On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly, the Commission directed the Secretary to initiate proceedings by Planning Commission Resolution No. 340; carried unanimously (4-0). B. Consideration of determination of compliance to the General Plan of proposed City acquistion of various lots for the implementation of the College of the Desert Area Specific Plan. Mr. Williams noted that this is one of many implementations of the College of the Desert Area Specific Plan and that is just a procedural matter. On a motion by Commissioner Reading, seconded by Commissioner Snyder, the Commission determined that the proposed planned acquisi- tion will conform with the adopted General Plan and by Planning Com- mission Resolution No. 341, this determination will be forwarded to the City Council; carried unanimously (4-0). IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. Review of Cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of February 21, 1978. Mr. Cipriani reviewed the cases noting that Case No. 73C was an old project with a new presentation. The project to be located next to Sunshine Meat, Fish & Liquor. The Design Review Board found no problems with the proposed project. Regarding Case No. 74C, the Design Review Board is requesting a sign program be submitted and noted that the interior circulation might create problems. Mr. Beebe noted that the alley is at an acute angle to E1 Paseo and he hopes that it will be realigned. Mr. Cipriani reviewed Case No. 110MF and noted the suggestions Mr. Johnson had made regarding the landscap- ing. Regarding Case No. 111MF, Mr. Cipriani noted that the Design Review Board had selected 4 of 5 elevations to be used and had requested that the landscaping be improved. I C - of(_71� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (TIQ 346-0611 March 16, 1978 Mr. Thomas H. Taylor 1333 Padres Trail La Canada Flintridge, CA 91011 Dear Mr. Taylor: With regard to your concerns expressed in your letter of March 7th, I wish to assure you that it would never be the City's intent to pro - cede with consideration of annexation or rezoning of your property at the southwest corner of Cook and Country Club, without notifying you of our intentions. The recent action of the Commission was to initiate proceedings by which we could begin to consider annexation of the property northerly of our present City limits, which would include the parcel you own. In order for us to have any meaningful dialogue with the property owners in the area, it was necessary for us to establish our initial thoughts as to possible zoning designa- tions in the area. We would not expect any public hearing on this subject until the end of May 1978. Prior to that time we will notify you in writing of our thoughts as to boundaries of a possible annexation and whether or not it would include your property. Further, ifyour property were to be included in the annexation we would notify you of our thoughts as to possible zoning on the property. As you requested, I am attaching to this letter, a copy of the City's adopted Sphere of Influence and a copy of the City's Zoning Map which shows the present northerly limits of the City. In response to your inquiry as to when the City meetings are held, our City Council meets the 2nd and 4th Thursdays of the month, the Planning Commission meets Tuesday, 9 days before the 2nd Thursday of the month, and Wednesday, 8 days before the 4th Thursday of the month. The Tuesday meeting is at 7:00 p.m. and the Wednesday meeting is at 1:00 p.m. Nor- mally the public hearing items for the Planning Commission are held the first meeting of the month, which is the Tuesday 9 days before the 2nd -2- Thursday of the month and the Council normally considers public hearing items on their last meeting of the month, which is the 4th Thursday. Both meetings are normally at 7:00 p.m. If you have any additional questions regarding this subject, please feel free to contact me. truly yours, Paul A. Williams, A.I.P. Director of Environmental Services PAW/ks Enc. 2 W, Thomas H. Taylor 1333 Patlres TrJ La Ga;J. ft.triclgs , Wif.ia 91o11 March 7, 1978 City Manager & Planning Director City of Palm Desert Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Sir: MAR 9 1978 f :F'.'J I DESEU CITY HALL My brother and I own 76 acres on the S. W. corner of Cook and Country Club, plus 110 acres on the S. W. corner of Cook and the future extention of Frank Sinatra Drive. When we saw this article we were alarmed that we had not been notified by you. Please advise us when Public Hearings will take place so that we can attend and voice our feelings. Will you please send us a map showing the current boundry lines of the City of Palm Desert, plus your sphere of influence boundry lines? Please also tell us when your City Council meetings are held and when your Planning Commission mettings are held. Thank you, vi '►'►'r'!9f W Thomas H. Taylor cc: Richard B. Taylor 1812 Ortiz Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 A t th,� D�s�rt pin Spr np, cal"OMIS aur Thursday, I Procedure begins on large annexation to Palm Desert PALM DESERT — Initial steps toward another annexa- tion to the city were taken by the planning commission Tuesday night.. The commission began prezoning proceedirogs for ap- j proximately 1,047 acres exten- ding from the present city limits north to Country Club Drive, between Monterey Drive and Cook Road. Environmental Services Director Paul Williams said the city has received petitions requesting annexation from a majority of the land owners in the area, "and itisap- propriate for the city to con- sider at this lime the best land use and zoning designations on the property comprising Amexation No. 5" Cities are allowed to prezone areas`they plan to annex, to promote orderly development and highest and best use of the property upon annexation. The city's tentative plans for zoning of various areas will be discussed with proper- ty owners. and after their recommendations are receiv- ed by the commission. a public hearing date will be set, r Thomas H. Taylor 139 P." Trail L Canada Fli.h4Jg., Galiforroi,.91ol l March 9, 197e �1_400 _1 Mr. James L. White Acting Planning Director Riverside Countv Planning Department 408o Lemon St.; Ninth Floor Riverside, CA 92501 A Dear Mr. White:Mt" It brother & I own 76 acres on the SW. corner of Cook and Country Club Drive. This is across the street from the proposed trailer park men- tioned in your "Notice of Public 2-8-78. We did not receive the attached until AFITR-the meeting... March 2, 1978. We are opposed at this time to rezoning from'R-1-12,000 to R-T-12,000, for use as a trailer park. May we plea.,_- lh�iow (in advance) when they rublic hearing on this subject will be held? Thank you. Cordially, A ;vl7A- IwZ. Thomas H. TF,.ylor cc: William J. Sullivan Planning Director 7 City of Indian Wells cc: Planning Director City of Palm Desert P. S. Would it be possible to receive an o date map showing the current spheres of influence for :1_ 'iies of: Indian Wells Palm Desert Rancho Mirage Cathedral City ncG E! V E D THT:.hb \ EN CITY OF PALM DESERT 34 >i Ali il(:"( iNU !!v 0)1100. t 'TY-PAIM UESERTZ DISTUC."r N'MYCE IS r;i-VEF i!j; eti'--C the Wtvftrsl:�'- ion !c, 11, Vn. :08. it1ver6ide Lnart t1se Said wpeudi1(:14L ..... . Dwellings sub- ard i 112141, 10; A':"jj Pei: I :Jjg Snit) or ollicc ;.5 the Q-Y t t at eck pro; arty locstvl at the r Sour 'Cil tu:uec of Oouatr- Or"', ,let A'.4 more. perLI-cularly describe. as follows: '----r'' MAP �7-y- Tha no.-th half of S, T.5S, RAF, SEB Cr qx\0 Vp 3dlay,—March 1., 1978 at 2:30' p.m. in �,tor, 4080 Lemon Strept (14th 'Floor: o 1*AV X t testimony will be heard. 6� 4 4' V� olsk'q qsNeA sslon. Counry of Riverside, State '06 qq OCCUNTY P14k&NING DUARTHERr faro 1 5fj�F'c�v STREFi. 141414 FLOOR 0 e <i 92501 *'P ti°q, tk;k" Ak rhig, ?Tani mr Wrect Nt ea I1-SN 66 0df As- Ot N� 01 t 0 0 , -ec 'p 0 mt 00 2S�.Ae 4p .44, op to 1z ca A Kathleen R. Kellogg Vera Gitelson Trust Vera Nelson & 4606 Forest Ave. S.E. 2216 E. Romneya Dr. La Verne Smelker Mercer Island, WA 98040 Anaheim, CA 92806 1370 Woodpark Lane Beaumont, TX 77706 Sandra Lederer K 222 Camino Alturas Palm Springs, CA 92262 Keith Wilson 2219 Wynkoop Dr. Colorado Springs, CO 80909 Helen Goldman 127 N. Calrk Dr. Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Frederick Hopkins J. F. Weber % Frank Hopkins 500 S. Myrtle St. Seattle, WA 98108 Country Club. Dr. Properties % D. J. Velo 1202 Mast Ct. Flossmore, IL 60422 Jean P. Gillespie 159 Long Neck Pt. Road Darien, Conn. 06820 E. M. Jorgeson 39405 Manzanita Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Los Cocineros, Ltd. % E. G. Marzicola P. 0. Box 47 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Lake Properties Betty & Walter Munday ` % S. I. Russell, Trustee 73401 Royal Palms 7855 Ivanhoe Ste. 420 Palm Desert, CA 92260 La Jolla, CA 92037 Desert Truck Sales Foundation for Retarded 36711 Cathedral Canyon Or Children Cathedral City, CA 92234 P. 0. Box 1183 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Margaret Hovley C.V.C.W.D. 7373 B Magnolia Ave. P. 0. Box 1058 Riverside, CA 92504 Coachella, CA 92236 David & Bernice Nelson Dennis C. Thorson P. 0. Box 654 % W. A. Foster Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 P. 0. Box 403 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Nedda H. Logan Allan S. Wilson 435 E. 52nd St. 279 Saguaro Dr. NY, NY 10022 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Marjory Medberry 708 E. Ranch Rd. Sacramento, CA 95825 Barbara M. Vail 70-171 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Dan E. Vail & Robert Floyd 70-171 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Richard C. Uhlman % General Delivery Chehalis, WA 98538 P R Realty Corp 73750 Country Club Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 John R. & Helen McCarty 73861 S. Desert Greens Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 John & Blanche Odom 3112 Porter St. Soquel, CA 95073 Raymond & Harriet Sommers 73841 S. Desert Greens Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Thomas & Sybal Whitlock 3292 Oak Knoll Los Alamitos, CA 90720 C/Z 01-78 2 of r, I Clarence L. Brown & University Plaza Inc. Floyd M. Lewis 333 S. Hope St. 27th F1 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Charles S. & June C. Gibbs 73070 Grapevine Palm Desert, CA 92260 V. A. Dunlay Elizabeth Dunlavy Newton Betts & Eddy Arnold Pearson Scott & Co. P. 0. Box 1066, Palm Desert, CA. Faye Shapiro Raff 801 S. Lucerne Blvd. Ap.t 208 Los Angeles, CA 90005 F. X. McDonald Jr. Katherine Winter 1900 E. Ocean Blvd. Apt 1410 45-547 Indian Wells Lane Long Beach, CA 90802 Palm Desert, CA 92260 r Hals Properties Carlo & Gioiella Lotito George Marzicola 2147 Sunset Blvd. Sameul G. & Cerina Perry Los Angeles, CA 90026 104 E. Robinson Rd. Imperial, CA 92251 David & Julia Fulton Christopher Lotito Linda & Micahel Teague 437 Audraine Dr. 72809 Pitahay St. Glendale, CA 91202 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Phyllis Y. Gregg k Raymond Shapiro Kenneth B. Jacques 2127 Amelia Ave. Robert H. Gregg Family Trust San Pedro, CA 90731 2645 Charlinda Ave. West Covina, CA 91791 Harry F. Taylor k Sec. Pac. Natl Bank Tr 17-1-00596-0 P. 0. Box 60802, Ter. Annex Los Angeles, CA 90060 John D. & Clare C. Garber k 420 S. Patencio Ln. Palm Springs, CA 92262 Robert H. Dietrich 835 Seagull L. Apt. C 115 Newport Beach, CA 92660 William Greenwall 528 N. E1 Camino Real San Clemente, CA 92672 Arthur & Ilee BAiley Alan C. Witnauer T Thelma Boyd & F. G. Ingram 3165 Knoll Way 49-305 Highway 74 Sp. 16 Riverside, CA 92501 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Desert Lands Inv. Co. William Domash Woodpecker Dev. Co. 141 S. Clark Dr. Apt. 325 P. 0. Box 258 Los Angeles, CA 90048 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Raymond Hovley 4895 Hovley Rd. Brawley, CA 92227 Morris Cohen 1471 S. Reeves Los Angeles, CA 90035 Thomas J. & June Collins 19445 Albert Ave. Cerritos, CA 90701 Teresa Hovley ` 360 I St. Brawley, CA 92227 Thelma K. Wagoner 1116 16th St. Bedford, IN 47421 Robert J. & Dolores Cordes ` 71-635 Estellita Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Irene Doyle 4145 Strong St. Riverside, CA 92501 Winford M. Rawlins 8637 E. 6th St. Downey, CA 90241 Chester & Rgwlins q Laack & Rawlins 3210 Portland Rd. Salem, OR 97303 Frank W. Swann Jr. 1216 Roscomare Rd. Los Angeles, CA 90024 r C/Z 01-78 lof—j William Zoeller R. B. Vir a Browns Viola & Japes Holmes 235 Vista Del Parque P. 0. B 3266 3008 Club House Circle Redondo Beach, CA 90277 $P R e, 99213 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Lorna & George Coghill Marian McGuire & Nels & Mariann Ohlson 73997 Oak Springs Dr. A Tastor 1211 East Cypress Palm Desert, CA 92260 73988 rt Greens Dr. 5 Glendora, CA 91740 Pallor e ert, CA 9 Betty & Edward Skeans Anthony Grimm Wilho & Lucie Maki 10550 S. Hester Ave. 73881 S. Desert Greens Dr. 912 Swinton St. Whittier, CA 90604 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Sault St. Marie, MI 49783 PR Realty Corp. Bryon & Leone Borton Ernest & Jean Heathe 2712 Oak Knoll Dr. 202 N. 70th Ave. 3618 B Vali Hi Los Alamitos, CA 90720 Yakima, WA 98908 Glendale, CA 91208 Vincent & Mary Roscoe Virgil Christ' utledge Bill & Marcina Ward 6036 S. Bruce St. 18183 Sa rta St. 5007 Elmwood Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89119 Fountai a A 92708 Los Angeles, CA 90004 Milve Hamilton Walter & Margaret Kurz Kenneth & Gladys Gunsalus 8703 Ranchito Ave. 73723 S. Desert Greens Dr. 3300 Howard Common Panorama City, CA 91402 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Fremont, CA 94536 Walter Hamilton Nathan & Elsie Glaubach Fredrick & Lucille & F.H. Milve Hamilton 1746 Ashland Ave. Newman 8703 Ranchito Ave. Santa Monica, CA 90405 46 Country Club Dr. Panorama City, CA 91402 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Arthur & Kathryn Eichmann Matilda Grant 73817 S. Desert Greens Dr. Rene & Prudence Berger 12330 Magnolia Blvd Palm Desert, CA 92260 73770 Desert Greens S N. Hollywood, CA 91307 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Orley & Stella Anderson Gilbert & Emma Kaer Leo & Josephine Montante 216 Port Royal Ave. P. 0. Box 267 8460 Glenoaks Blvd. Foster City, CA 94464 Lapine, OR 97739 Sun Valley, CA 91352 Dar ell & Win ' ed Turner James & Dorothy Auld P R Realty Corp. 1420S 2327 Florencita Dr. 10841 Hesby St. Manhatt CA 90266 Montrose, CA 91020 N. Hollywood, CA 91601 C/Z 01-78 4 of go Vivian Bunton 13413 Traub Ave. Los Anglees, CA 90059 Richard & Alice Bushwell 32212 Ave. Los Amigos San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Nellie Gandy Bank of America Exr of N Gandy Decd Est. P. 0. Box 3635 Term. Annex Los Anglees, CA 90051 Mau en Br n Josep C eary 16177 ima Ave. Paci is P isa des, CA 90272 Ted Weiner Oil Properties P. 0. Box 12819 Forth Worth, TX 76116 John Ciprein Palm Desert Greens Assoc. 73750 Country Club Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 C/Z 01-78 5 of 5 13p