Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout42ND AVENUE/MERLE DRIVE C/Z 02-79 1979a 0 April 6, 1979 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM 'S' (STUDY) T4 RM (U.A.) (MOBILE HOME PARK AND MOBILE HOME'SUB- DIVISION RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, UPON ANNEXATION) ZONING, OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE, FOR APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN 42ND AVENUE AND MERLE DRIVE, EAST -OF REBECCA ROAD. CASE NO. C/Z 02-79 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by THE CITY OF PALM DESERT to approve a Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) zoning, or any other zone deemed appropriate, for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. P.R.-5 sour O.S. I -AZ OZ-( 9 (ANNE)1r. A,?EA No. i0) R" N SAL, S.P. 00-M MIG PEARL MGM MERT.GUIORMI\BBMO TELfP11M[ (FNI 31\'0\II R T C r y Portola Golf Ranchos Ltd. c/o Jack H. Sennett n,FF 1 it 130 E. 17th St. Ste.K Costa Mesa( CA 92627 ERVInow.1-I.TAL SEFV,CES 621-954-01TJ-7 CITY OF PALM DESERT dCd 316 04/L4/19 RdNRN TO SE40eR ,Jul D1.1 jWdLEEAS D To FOR ARD ASSTJ MICRLY PEAR LRME. MLY WQf GYfCIW %Yf0 I 1� al TELEN10Rf (TIN NO-ONI e10.0AF RECEIVED 'orgola Golf Ranchos k,,1123- Via Azulejos EObROR1aENTAL UOICES lai Springs, CA 92262 cnr of FA 3 DESERT ,61y fi21-5Q5-n2n-A o I,-EI 1 AO-YTSMMYPEMEAXE,R MEV,. .FORM1A02M0F48 TELEIIIMf (7141 ""911 L`1i y < I James C. Farber Tr �g 12 Narcisse Dr. C! Rancho Palos Verdes, CA w ¢ o { 90274 621-581-002-7 4K g� W t kx 17-ITO-16E-IZ9 00016 VO uuapvsvd qjnos '7— IT .UOF 47 Vo-ldv UOPUAJ OZZI .1a *0 AD1j'q5 "I of S&MM'AD, sv •A At.- JQF nusE J PIA P, zip cooE 45M MIMu YEAR LANE, Ahui MERT.G FOR.. It.. m. TELMORE (714) 346-0611 Mariann B Henry 15355 Suns t Blvd. Pacific Pal ades. CA90272 621-391-020-6 �C� M=LY PEAR UWE. TELEPHONE (714) 340-0$11 idney. Burns y F Bur' lark 56 N. lark St. Los An les, CA 90069 621-39 -010-7 9 10 USE 01p cnrr F• IAuERT CITY OF �� 5 4 - 4 A ORDINANCE NO. 206 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE IN SECTION 25.92, ET SEQ, BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM 'S' STUDY TO RM,(U.A.) ON APPROXIMATELY. 40 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN 42ND AVENUE AND MERLE DRIVE, EAST OF REBECCA ROAD. CASE NO. CZ 02-79 The City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, pursuant to City Municipal Code Section 25.84.080, and Section 25.80.020, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN, as follows: SECTION 1: That the Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 25.92, et sen., the Zoning Map, is hereby amended to change the zone from 'S' Study to RM, (U.A.) on property illustrated on the attached exhibit, labeled Exhibit 'A'. SECTION 2: The City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, California, is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance in the Palm Desert Post, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Palm Desert, California, and shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and the same shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Palm Desert City Council this 10thday of May , 1979, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Brush, McPherson, Newbrander & Mullins NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Wilson ATTEST: n �1 P.R.-5 DUI CKS I AVER DRIVE P.R.-5 O.S. S. I. , S. P. 2/ d AVE %r S to R M (u.a. / ANNEX. AREA P.R.-5, N AA VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) MR. IRVING LUBAY stated they were of the understanding that the fee would be calculated and determined, excluding some 20-30 acres in the Wash. Cash would be put up or bond posted, which could not be called upon before they get into the 4th phase, or 18 months which would be about October 30, 1980. Mr. Doty explained that they were in agreement with the im- provement of the extension of Portola to Hovely and wanted to clarify that the street would be two -traffic lane width at their property boundary, grading would follow the existing terrain and it would be a temporary type paving, to be main- tained by them during the course of their construction. Mayor Mullins invited input in OPPOSITION; there being none, he declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman Brush said he had several questions of staff, either before or after the meeting. He felt if this developer were relieved of the Drainage fee in the wash, other developers should receive the same consideration. He stated the same should apply as to the timing of payment of fees. He questioned if Portola would be improved to City Standards all the way to Hovely Lane. Mr. Bouman explained that in some cases there will be develop- ment in the form of .golf courses. In this case there may be a driving range, but it would be pretty much left in its natural state. As far as the timing of payment, the rationale is similar to that of the Flood control project with Rancho Bella Vista. The sum of $300,000 cash deposit would tie up the cash flow of the developer while the acceptance of bond would guarantee the City its money. He explained further that the City required minimum standard on the road as this is being done only as an emergency access and that the major storm drain may come down this road and it would have to be torn up anyhow. Councilman Newbrander questioned if the developer would not be bound to contribute to the Portola improvement, and Mr. Williams responded that they would fully improve Portola along their frontage. Mayor Mullins stated that developers should be exempt from the drainage fee along the Wash, and that this project would establish that.. Clyde Beebe explained that the exact acreage to be exempt would be determined and done by deed. Councilman McPherson moved to amend Special Condition No. 5 to include, approximately 30 acres in the Wash to be exempt from Drainage Fees, and to adopt Resolution 79-45, approving Tract No. 13881. Councilman Brush seconded. Motion carried on a 3-1-1 vote with Councilman Newbrander voting No. Councilman Newbrander stated she felt a part of the Wash would be used, as in other developments. � /1 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) Mayor Mullins declared the the Public Hearing open and asked for input in FAVOR of the Zone Change. None was offered. Mayor Mullins asked for input in OPPOSITION. None was offered. He declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman McPherson moved to waive further reading and pass Ordinance No. 206 to second reading, approving a Change of Zone from 'S' Study to RM, (U.A.). Councilman Brush seconded. Motion carried on a 3-1-1 vote, with Councilman Newbrander voting No. D ANNEXATION NO. 8 and All Protests Palm Desert. - IRWIN SIEGEL APPLICAPTT: Consideration of Any Regarding The Propose Annexation To The City Of Paul Williams reviewed this matter for Council, stating that it was considered by LAFCO on March 8, 1979. The City was directed to hold a Public Hearing for the sole purpose of allowing property owners within the area to be annexed to be heard. Application was filed with LAFCO by Resolution No. 78-173, adopted on December 28, 1978. He stated no verbal or written communication has been re- ceived from property owners, and therefore Staff recommended adoption of Resolution 79-46. Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing OPEN and asked for input in FAVOR of the Annexation. IRWIN SIEGEL addressed Council, stating that their application had not been altered in any way; they have agreed to all re- quirements placed upon them, and are in favor, lie thanked the Council for their consideration. Mayor Mullins asked for input in OPPOSITION. VICE MAYOR RICHARD H. BUSS, Indian Wells, addressed Council with a prepared statement in opposition, attached as Exhibit "A", and hereby made a part of these minutes. ATTORNEY JAMES R. CARNES, 193 S. Civic Drive, Palm Springs, was of the opinion that under the present procedures, an Ordinance was required to be filed and delivered to LAFCO. Paul Williams responded that recent changes do not require Ordinance. Mayor Mullins asked for further input. There was none. He de- clared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman Brush moved to waive further reading and adopt Resolutiot No. 79-46, ordering the territory to be annexed. Councilman McPherson seconded. Motion carried unanimously with the members present. VIII. RESOLUTIONS A. RESOLUTION NO. 79-38 - A^Resolution of the City TCouncil Of Gf:au?. oil 1F8:1MZ=N:N=(M�Zv -P 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 March 16, 1979 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM 'S' (STUDY) TO -RM (U.A.) (MOBILE HOME PARK AND MOBILE HOME SUB- DIVISION RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, UPON ANNEXATION) ZONING, OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE FOR APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN 42ND AVENUE AND MERLE DRIVE, EAST OF REBECCA RD. CASE NO. C/Z 02-79 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by THE CITY OF PALM DESERT to approve a Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) zoning, or any other zone deemed appropriate, for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A "DRAFT" NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the following listed project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration should be adopted: CASE NO. C/Z 02-79 Request for a Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) zoning, or any other zone deemed appropriate for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. An appeal from this determination may be made to the Planning Commission within eight (8) days of the date of posting of this public notice by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 78-32, with the Department of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within the said time, this determination shall become final. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, AICP Date of Public Notice Director of Environmental Services Date Appeal Period Expires 7g b METHOD OF NOTICING: Posting Mailing to owners of property within 300' Publication in newspaper Other mailing (agencies and other persons requesting notice) 45475 MICKEY PEAR LAME, MW M]Gf.GYIMaIA YEPM TELE—E (IN) m-- Portola Golf Ranchos Ltd. c/o Jack H. Bennett 130"S. 17th St. Ste.K Costa Mesa, CA 92627 621-954-013-7 dclr 3) 011912.11 0-1/19/79 '.�. dctm.n [a u6DUe3 dE1C UdLLVEdASLE Ai AUUNESSED „N Alsl_E TO r0d,,ARU A oL6w, ®4 SF IDt9osmeR �+ 45-E15 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PLLY MrV..GUIORR1A?EEW EVE arc mEPxone nul SRS-o5u Zae ��A0.099SZDAnibarnan ��42-5anie Cir. PalmCA 92260 ,.._�a:u»ww.w.l+.+'.+►«..-...ra.:..«...I...»w.�.......- ...,.M...E�ERRr�w... %00 1 •� qo Ap-[IS MIOILY KM 4XE, MLII CE9EMF. GNtOXXIA tt2X0 TFL[PXSXe IiM) N6.Oall 'n Portola'Golf Ranchos Ltd. c/o Jack H. Benriett 130 E. .7th St. Ste.K _ Costa Mesa CA 92627 - ENrIPOUM1iCNi AL DESERT KVICES 621-954-0113-7 pcd 34491r1 a4/L4/19 CnY Oi PAIN DESERT o SFAUeR R,,gAd T rluT I jMB�E 10 FORIJARD'hD 4527E FXIGLY PEAR "HE. NLN WEXF. CAUFg1XM9tEW TE,,,PONE IT19I NE•9E11 14XryF0 � TO {y.._ WXITEP UYDELII•ERd3! E AS ADDRESSED Anibal M• $$I 4;1 "" o- 42-570 Stel �? -S Palm Desert lr Q` l ¢< 9}215PAICXLYPE,M IAXE,M MEM.CAUFOXXIA9t 1 rt MT t aLEPMONE (Tlq NB•0111 • •1r 'Porpola Golf Ranchos i123. Via Azulejos haled Springs, CA 92262 1(� R91-SOS-(170-A V � f11 - S39b3S3p W)Vd ! � lV(Hil^NOLIAN3 afj,lao• a�f f•_ ! 4 M I N I 5 t H N O V'U W I O M� �1 33 11 g EZu C�j� N ? » y � FiF,CEIVED , APR 1') 1179 i DESERT CNVIROt:IdEN E9 CItY OF PNM UESEIIT u 1 a 41-900-16£-1Z9 9!{t gr S9ul tl0 dS'u PuowetQ o -1 •uq s8 xiioi u?^ZZZS£Z r7l oz ade0 aa]ad w 1 � •y' - 11,E-9K (111)1N 31U i •� eIF(1 ;.' `-,,�" \�,. OKunWOlnn'lx%30lflw'3xn Nna A'f Iw cm-st 3GOD dILNd'06 I — 3sn Sumo -Wd 5 rna jai,.,. N!Jll; AT-,i., -1 ' - C ®Y. Ctgd6� ooff ncwmu mmm= —13m f to cvx t ` ! i" i.i ODE' II s '• - M-[.N IRIRIY R1R "me, MLY 06ERf U 'f Nu OEM • .. •-• i .I i rele9Nox9 trb) »s-oal �� Shirley C. Drisc 11 1220 Lyndon Apt. 4 South Pasadena, CA 91030 -- f�N m��' '0es �• l 621-391-017-4 - - _ Fti L7Hy . ""Ails UVP .O• • _� 1. �___.�.._ -r-- 5 � canawccff pson�mmomma Z!P rODf } _ Mly pideR, LLLIfORN4 NSYW ^ • r[UPININ[trR1 »,-0,11 � 1 o ru �� ' Mariann Henry ' $ Lj ✓ '- 15355 Suns s t Blvd. nZ •-• n cA 1 . L.; I Pacific Pal ades, CA 90272 621-391-020-6 ..�: 3 g (1:5t2'1�7 o:T ]1 =(DownG::va 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No.: C/Z 02-79 Project Change of Zone Applicant: City of Palm Desert Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) zoning, or any other zone deemed appropriate for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval. The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc.) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. March 26 , 1979, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee A�at their meeting of March 28 The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official, City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ ss PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No.: C/Z 02-79 Project: Change of Zone Applicant City of Palm Desert Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) zoning, or any other zone deemed appropriate for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval. The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc.) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. March 26 , 1979, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of March 28 The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official, City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ ss PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No.: C/Z 02-79 Project Applicant Change of Zone City of Palm Desert Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: Approval of a Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) zoning, or any other zone deemed appropriate for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval. The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc.) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. March 26 1979, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of March 28 The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official, City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ ss PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS �tnl� o Q� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE March 15. 1979 APPLICANT Elynor Falk c/o Robert D. Rudnick, Attorney at Law 265 North Indian Avenue, Palm Springs, CA 92262 CASE NO.: C/Z 02-79 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of March 14, 1979 CONTINUED TO DENIED % APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 471 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 471 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR PRE -ZONING APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES PRIOR TO ANNEXATION. CASE NO. C/Z 02-79 WHEREAS, the City of Palm Desert has received a petition requesting annexation from the land owners of property generally located on lands between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road, and east of the present City limits of Palm Desert as indicated on the attached Exhibit 'A'; and, WHEREAS, as a result of the above action, the City has designated the subject property indicated on the attached Exhibit 'A' as City Annexation No. 10; and, WHEREAS, it is appropriate for the City of Palm Desert to consider at this time the appropriate land use and zoning designa- tions on the property comprising Annexation No. 10 in order to promote orderly development in the best interest of the community upon its annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. A Change of Zone is hereby initiated for pre -zoning of approximately 40 acres comprising City Annexation No. 10 from 'S' Study to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) Exhibit 'A', or any other zone deemed appropriate. 2. That the Commission does hereby direct the Secretary to establish the appropriate procedures to be adhered to in the pre -zoning process. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 14th day of March, 1979, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KRYDER, SNYDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: FLESHMAN N Minutes Palm Desert Planning Cuuuuission -.Ar;il 3, 1979 Page Four Commissioner Fleshman offered an addition to No. 5 as follows: "or as determined by City Council.", and this was agreed upon by the applicant and the Planning Commission. Chairman Snyder declared the Public Hearing open, asking if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this proposal. There being none, he closed the Public Hearing, and asked for the pleasure of the Commission. On a motion by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the case was approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 474, with additions as follows: Special Condition No. 2 - Add "or provide alternate adequate protection westerly of Portola as found acceptable by the Director of Public Works". Special Condition No. 5 - Add: "or as determined by City Council." carried unanimously (4-0). D. Case No. /Z 02-79 CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Request for Change of Zone from 'S' Study to R-M (U.A.) or any other zone deemed appropriate for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. Commissioner Fleshman left the Council Chambers at this time, due to a potential conflict of interest. Mr. Crump presented this item to the Commission. Mr. Williams noted that the Resolution prepared should be changed to delete the words "or any other zone deemed appropriate" in all applicable areas of the Resolution, stating that if approved, the motion would be to recommend a change of zone from S to R-M. Chairman Snyder declared the Public Hearing open, asking if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this proposal. JERRY ALLEN, 74-573 Merle Drive, stated that he represents 127 homeowners in the subject area. He does not actually wish to oppose this request, but did wish to state concern regarding sand protection for surrounding area. He related that he has lived in area for 15 years, and during that time, planted as many as 500 Tamarisk trees as sand protection, Approximately eight years ago, a development came in on the west and cut down the Tamarisk trees, assuring property owners that sand protection would be provided; however, they have to date only provided a chain -link fence. Mr. Allen is concerned that this may happen with new development in subject area, and is seeking assurance that it will not. Minutes Page Five -.P#-Jm Desert Planning Commission April 3, 1979 VI. D. (cont.) Mr. Allen then asked if these mobile homes would be recessed, and Mr. Williams answered yes - - they would be comparable to Palm Desert Greens. F. X. MC DONALD,Jr. , Long Beach, stated that he owns 40 acres north of Palm Desert Estates, and last July, the City took 10 acres from his land for habitat of the Fringe -Toed Lizards. Mr. McDonald wondered why they have not done the same for the subject request; shouldn't this be Open Space also. Shouldn't other developers have to give up a quarter of their land to Open Space. Mr. Williams stated that the City has recently developed a Master Plan of Parks and Recreation, whereby they defined the Sand Dune Park as the area north of 42nd Avenue. With the adoption of that plan, the previous designation was deleted. Chairman Snyder stated that this property falls outside the jurisdiction of the park requirements of the General Plan. He sympathizes with the question and hopes that we can solve it some day. Chairman Snyder declared the Public Hearing closed, asking for the pleasure of the Commission. On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, Planning Commission Resolution No. 475 was approved with the deletion of the words "or any other zone deemed appropriate" where applicable; carried 3-0-1 (AYES: Berkey, Kryder, Snyder; ABSTAIN: Fleshman). ✓II. OLD BUSINESS - None VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Coachella Valley County Water District Projects in the City of Palm Desert Mr. Williams reviewed the proposals, noting that that the request is to find the proposals in compliance with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan. Chairman Snyder commented that he hoped Public .Works will continue to have Coachella Valley County Water District put streets back in good condition at the conclusion of projects. On a motion by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Fleshman, Planning Commission Resolution No. 476 was approved as presented; carried unanimously (4-0). B. Consideration of date change for May 1, 1979, Planning Commission meeting Is— IDi l l i n... e. e. 1 ..; --A +4...+ - --- R1 4 ..+ ..a A..+.... .......I A ........-. CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report on: Pre -Annexation Zoning Applicant: City of Palm Desert Case No.: C/Z 02-79 (Ref: Annexation No. 10) Date: April 3, 1979 I. REQUEST: Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) zoning, or any other zone deemed appropriate for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. LOCATIONAL MAP: II. BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING: North - O.S. and S.I., S.P. South - Riverside County R-1 East - Riverside County R-1 Staff Report - Case No. C/Z 02-79 Page Two April 3, 1979 III. DISCUSSION: At their meeting of March 14, 1979, the Planning Commission considered the question of Pre -annexation Zoning for the area encompassed by proposed City Annexation No. 10. Discussions at the meeting concerned an interpretation of the General Plan, applicable land use, and appropriate implementing zoning. It was determined that Medium Density Residential, 5-7 d.u./ac., was the applicable (underlying) land use once the Community Park designation had been redefined by the Parks and Recreation Element. The annexation petitioner requested consideration of R-M zoning, which the Commission tentatively found consistent with the General Plan and adjacent uses. The matter is now before the Pre -annexation Zoning. The appear still valid. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Commission for formal consideration of tentative conclusions drawn previously Based on the justification provided in the Resolution: Recommend approval to the City Council of a Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to R-M (U.A.), or any other zone deemed appropriate, by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: CASE NO. C/Z 02-79 No comment. L. C yde Beebe do DATE: March 23, 1979 V SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 9pS COMPANY R. W. RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Zone Change Case #C/Z 02-79 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA Mailing Address P. O. BOX 2200. RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 March 19, 1979 Location of Wearest Gas Main: in Merle Drive ;�FC E IV E E) MAR 2 n 1979 ENVIROINMctiiAL &-RVICES CITY OF FA:M ucSERT This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area were the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact this office for assistance. X_`'I R. W. Ridde1� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 475 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM 'S' STUDY TO R-M (U.A.) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN 42ND AVENUE AND MERLE DRIVE, EAST OF REBECCA ROAD. CASE NO. C/Z 02-79 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 3rd day of April, 1979, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a Change of Zone from 'S' Study to R-M (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) initiated by the CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, on approximately 40 acres of land, generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road; the site being more particularly described as: APN 621-400-002-7 621-400-007-2 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Environmental Quality Procedure, Resolution No. 78-32", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that this project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their recommendations and actions, as described below: 1. The land use resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with adjacent existing and proposed land uses. 2. The proposed Change of Zone would be compatible with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan. 3. The proposed Change of Zone conforms to the intent and purpose of the City's Zoning Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of a Change of Zone from 'S' Study to R-M (U.A.), as shown on,the attached map labeled Exhibit 'A'. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 3rd day of April, 1979, by the following vote, to wit: C DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN March 20, 1979 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Case No. C/Z 02-79 Dear Mr. Williams, P.O. Box 246 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET PERRIS. CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3163 We have no objection to the proposed change of zone. Fire protection requirements will be established at the time development plans are received. P-I'j - we", David J. Ortegel Fire Marshal DJO:dt 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 March 16, 1979 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM 'S' (STUDY) TO RM (U.A.) (MOBILE HOME PARK AND MOBILE HOME SUB- DIVISION RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, UPON ANNEXATION) ZONING, OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE FOR APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN 42ND AVENUE AND MERLE DRIVE, EAST OF REBECCA RD. CASE NO. C/Z 02-79 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by THE CITY OF PALM DESERT to approve a Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) zoning, or any other zone deemed appropriate, for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 6, 1979 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM 'S' (STUDY) TO RM (U.A.) (MOBILE HOME PARK AND MOBILE HOME SUB- DIVISION RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, UPON ANNEXATION) ZONING, OR ANY OTHER ZONE DEEMED APPROPRIATE, FOR APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN 42ND AVENUE AND MERLE DRIVE, EAST OF REBECCA ROAD. CASE NO. C/Z 02-79 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by THE CITY OF PALM DESERT to approve a Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) zoning, or any other zone deemed appropriate, for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2010t 2015.5 CCP) PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF CASE NO. C/Z 92-79 C/Z 02-79 I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over, the ' age of eighteen years# and hot a party to or interested in the above entitled clatter. I an the principal clerk of the printer of PALM DESERT POST# a newpaper of general circulations printed and published daily in the city of Riversides County of Riversides and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riversides State of California# under date of October 5# 1964# Case number 83658; that the notices of which the annexed is a printed copy# has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates# to —wit: 03122 s1979 I Certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated March 22# 1979 at Riverside# California CITY OF PALM D ltr r1+WF•c-a-«-aracr-.,,.i.,.---Bjer —ee of-Hope—,U on Sunday at an Church. REQUEST FOR A�asses RM (U.A.) (MO 11 a.m. and an The organist, AT ON? ZON N ng Mass at 5:15 Councell, will play PRIATE FOR .,pw LOCATED EBB LOUTS CafhOIIC EAST OF REBE followin numb g "My be On l�l Gwch is in Cathedral .SOUL Guard" by Muffat; midway between God My Faithful aim Springs and Palm by Handel; and " g7,rt off Highway 111 zona" by 2ipoli. rvenn Avenue. The choir anthem pq" ducted by Dr. Job 1 ;,Znited Church Norman will be:. . i f the Desert so loved the World (�: Palestrina. On this fourth Sunday Dtent the Rev. Dr. My- St. Margaret ; m E. Cole of the United " 6tw' ch of the Desert, 43- Episcopal ttlbJfarner Trail, Palm On Sunday, M e"rt Country Club, 25th the Fourth Su itl;tell of "The Gifts of in Lent, Father 7 od-. The theme is tak- done, S.S.P. will /i,om Paul's Epistle brate a said Euch �Lt Me Ephesians 2:1-8, at 8 a.m. at St. Ma) are saved through ,,,,Y et's Church, Higt its it is the gift of 74 Palm Desert. He °d ' Organist Robert M. be assisted by reader A. J. Sfingi. " ,orwin will sing the de- At the 10 a.m. Cl otional solo. :Services begin at 11 Eucharist, The Rt. 'slack. Winter visitors Hal R. Gross, Re Suffragan Bishop o re cordially invited to egon, will be the e trend. brant and preacher _ _ will be assisted by P` Hope Lutheran ther- Clemons and Said MOW.m. Public Hear ther Theodore, S.S. in the cot The Covenant Play- Partita on the D and place Prickly Pear as mterrs, a church drama "Jesu, Metne Fre roux from Reseda. will r , Tah..n w0fh a, 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A "DRAFT" NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the following listed project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration should be adopted: CASE NO. C/Z 02-79 Request for a Change of Zone from 'S' (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) zoning, or any other zone deemed appropriate for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. An appeal from this determination may be made to the Planning Commission within eight (8) days of the date of posting of this public notice by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 78-32, with the Department of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within the said time, this determination shall become final. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, AICP Date of Public Notice 3 �9 Director of Environmental Services Date Appeal Period Expires 5 ,99 % METHOD OF NOTICING: Posting Mailing to owners of property within 300' Publication in newspaper Other mailing (agencies and other persons requesting notice) NOTICE OF DETERMINATION (Negative Declaration) TO: Office of the County Clerk From: City of Palm Desert County of Riverside 45-275 Prickly Pear Ln. 4050 Main Street Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Riverside, Ca. 92501 ( ) Secretary for Resources 1416 Ninth St., Room 1311 Sacramento, Ca. 95814 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 15083(f) of the State EIR Guidelines. Project Title/Common Name Case No. C/Z 02-79/City of Palm Desert, Applicant State Clearinghouse Number if submitted to State Clearinghouse n/a Contact Person Telephone Number Area Code (714) 346-0611 Mr. Murrel Crump Project Location 40 acres, generally located between 42nd Ave and Merle Dr. east of Rebecca Rd. Project Description Change of Zone from 'S' Study to RM U.A. Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation). This is to advise that the City of Palm Desert has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project has been approved by the City; 2. The project ( ) will (x) will not have a significant effect on the environment; 3. An Environmental Impact Report was not prepared in connection with this project; and 4 A Negative Declaration was prepared for th' oject pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A copy of the Negative Declar ion may be examined at the above City Hall address. Dated: zr-\ o\ r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Div. 6, Article 7, Sec. 15083, of the California Administra- tive Code) Case No.: C/Z 02-79 (Common Project Name, if any) Applicant/Project Sponsor: Project Description/Location: Change of Zone from "S" (Study) to RM (U.A.) (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District, Upon Annexation) for approximately 40 acres, generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. The Director of the Dept. of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid poten- tially significant effects, may,a+sp be found attached. I. 11 .. 111I11..Y , -1. Dir. of Environmental Sery i t City oC Pal ■O S sent. Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: CASE NO. C O2 -7j Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Name, address, and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: AC� Dom. Grs�ui�O f3Cax / %77 per LOL- - V:' o 21_1 3s/L--e 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre- sentative): eifILCG 4F. Die. of Tl/DEr�i- OF c i i a ih crfis QED✓/c�S 3. Common name of project (if any):�_�/���/ - "A ZI.�;�III<q .dam /D 4. Project location (street address or general location):A_jI[/V 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds): 4<G /Ao 'gal -4/" DDT "7 62/ yYOa —Oa 7 �Z 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought): 7. Relationship to a rger project or series of proj s (describe how this project relates to other activities, phases, and develop- ments planned, or now underway): E.9WI&2E.P.fTiD.! ZDN/NB 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go forward, including those required by the City, Regional, State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required): EXISTING CONDITIONS: 9. Project site area: ze of property in sq or acreage 10. Present zoning: :-/2 c0e (Proposed zoning): 11. General Plan land use designation: Al". 12. Existing use of the project site: /"k1,r-r 13. Existing use on adjacent properties: (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc.). Wont!-d,4cyw/> As-og'-- mNz. r WK 14. Site topography (describe): 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO cv YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved): 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: 18. Describe any cultural, historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: 4#94 I}lL T /.( 0 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms): B. Schedule of unit sizes:O 4 �e'w 7 7�" AV4!Le� "Aldd! C. Number of stories_ Height feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft.) 5a� (hgt.)/ E. Type of household size expected (population projection for the project): .7,fl5d A6A640!> 'W /70 3S-05 F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities: Aoo 5 7&AIAII S COA, 5 " AM5 ele AoAe �1k;1 tA*A4 AMMS7 G. Is there any night lighting of the project: ?0A1FA1r/AU+" TEoVAIIS A�i H. Range of sales prices or rents: $ 4MK't(CVA1 to $ I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paving, including streets . . . . . . . . . . . . . Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . . . . . . . % JAMeXvW!/ 20. Commercial, Industrial, Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s) (if offices, s type & number): B. Number of square feet in total building area: C. Number of storiesAighfeet. D. Largest single buil(Hgt.) E. Number of square feorage area:F. Total number of reqacesnumber provided G. Hours of operation: H. Maximum number of cshoppers, etc., at one time: I. Maximum number of ployees at one time: J. If patron seati is involved, state the number: K. Is there a night lighting of the project: Yes No L. Percey(t of total project devoted to: Bu ding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . aving, including streets. . . . . . . . . . . Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation). . . . a a Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects: Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 21. Change in existing features of hillsides, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity.y� 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind t' or flooding. 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or v alteration of existing drainage patterns. 25. Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc.) 29. Changes the demand for utility services, beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. 31. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. 32. Results in the dislocation of people. V1*1 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. * dloT717/YE [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. NO CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Am Name (Print JorType) 4 Signature -Date INITIAL STUDY FEE: /V/4, (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub- mit with this form.) it CASE NO. cZ 1!7,? ENVIAONPTENTAL SERVICES DEPT. INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST NOTE: The availability of data necessary to address the topics listed below shall form the basis of a decision as to whether the application is considered complete for purposes of environmental assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers, possible mitigation measures and comments are provided on attached sheets). Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or _ ✓ _ overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? c� d. The destruction, covering, or modification - of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? _ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water -movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? e. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? f. Reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, and crops)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? 2. Yes Maybe No r c� s 6. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resource? j 7. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or re- quire the development of new sources of energy? 8. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, pesticides, oil, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 9. Economic Loss. Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the value of property and improvements endangered by flooding? b. A change in the value of property and improvements exposed to geologic hazards beyond accepted community risk standards? j;10. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels to the point at which accepted community noise and vibration levels are exceeded? 11. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the as era tttion of the present developed or planned land use of an area? 12. Open Space. Will the proposal lead to a decrease in the amount of designated open space? 13. Population. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of the City? b. Change in the population distribution by age, income, religion, racial, or ethnic group, occupational class, household type? Yes MAX e 3. a L/ 4. Yes Maybe No 14. Employment. Will the proposal result in additional new long-term jobs provided, or a change in the number and per cent employed, unemployed, and underemployed? 15. Housing. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in number and per cent of housing units by type (price or rent range, zoning category, owner -occupied and rental, etc.) relative to demand or to number of families in various income classes in the City? b. Impacts on existing housing or creation of a demand for additional housing? 16. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? / !/ b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 4-17. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for, new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? _ _ ✓ c. Schools? �✓ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? ✓ e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ✓ f. Other governmental services? — _ 5. Yes Maybe No 18. Public fiscal Balance. Will the proposal result in a net change in government fiscal flow (revenues less operating expenditures and annualized capital expenditures)? (✓ 19. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? r✓ b. Communications system? c. Water? �✓ d. Sewer or septic tanks? �✓ e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 20. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. A change in the level of community health care provided? 21. Social Services. Will the proposal result in an increased denand for provision of general social services? L/ 22. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: _ a. Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? c. Lessening of the overall neighborhood (or area) attractiveness, pleasantness, and uniqueness? 23. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? ✓ 7, 24. Archeolo ical/Historical. Will the proposal resu t in an a to— T ration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object, or building? 4-- 25 6. Yes MaLbe No Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment or to curtail the diversity in the environment? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are indi- vidually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ Initial Study Prepared By: Lase iio. UIL UZ-/9 Annexation No.10 Environmental Evaluation Checklist Explanation of "Yes" and "Maybe" answers and comments on evaluation subjects. 1. EARTH c. The proposal will result in a change in the natural topography by virtue of grading activities associated with development. * e. The proposal may result in temporary construction impacts related to wind erosion of soils, but City requirements for watering during grading activities Should reduce any impact to an insignif- icant level. Development of the site would tend to stabilize soils to eliminate future wind erosion on blowing sand. * 2. AIR The proposal will involve the use of motor vehicles by project residents, but the proposal will not, of itself, breach any State or Federal Air Quality Standards, or significantly damage valley air quality. LIMM .&W, The proposal will pose an incremental increase for domestic water supply, but will not result in an over -draft condition. b. The proposal will result in a change in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff by virtue of development. Project waters are proposed to be contained within the site by directing sheet flow to the fairways. * 4. PLANT LIFE The proposal will replace the existing natural vegetative cover with ornamental landscaping and ground covers. No perceived adverse environ- mental effect will occur. * 5. ANIMAL LIFE The proposal may involve maintaining domestic animals by project occupants. Existing mammals and rodents and reptiles on the site will probably be displaced. Landscaping on the site will probably provide a new habitat for birds and insects. b. & d. The proposal is within the habitat range of the Fringe -Toed Lizard (a potentially threatened species). Over 200 sq. miles of habitat range.would continue to exist after implementation of this proposal. The Palm Desert General Plan makes specific provision for maintanance of a defined natural habitat area (Sand Dunes Park) as a partial mitigation of the impact of urbanized uses. K * 6. NATURAL RESOURCE., The proposal will use natural resources in the construction of the project, some of which may not be renewable. The proposal will also involve the continued use of petrolem products by project occupants. The demands of this project are considered to be incremental and are not considered to present a significant adverse impact. * 7. ENERGY Energy efficient standards within the Palm Desert Building Code (adopted version of the Uniform Bulding Code) will be applied to this project. Motor fuel considerations are discussed in 6, above. The proposal will not involve the use of hazardous substances. * 9. ECONOMIC LOSS a & b The proposal site is not endangered by flooding, but will be subject to strong round motion in the event of an earthquake. Palm Desert Building Codes provide for lateral seismic loading to mitigate damage from ground motion. * 10. NOISE The proposal itself will not involve new adverse noise other than that assoc- iated with urban uses. The residential development will be enclosed by a solid masonry wall to act as a sound barrier to perimeter street noises. * 11. LAND USE The proposal is consistent with the planned land use of the area. * 12. OPEN SPACE The proposal does not involve the use of a designated open space area. A Portion of the project site will be used for private open space. 13. POPULATION a & b The proposal will result in approximately 350 more persons in the immediate area (based on 2 persons per household). The population increase is planned as a part of the Palm Desert General Plan, but if rapidly implemented it could be considered a very minor temporary increase in the general area of human population density. The proposal will probably be owner -occupied, upper middle income households. 14. EMPLOYMENT The proposal may involve management/maintenance personnel. 15. HOUSING The proposal may result in approximately 175 mobile home units. Units will probably be owner -occupied (partially on a seasonal basis), and may serve as a second home. Units would probably be secured at prevailing market rates for upper income consumers. 16. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION a. The proposal will result in the generation of additional vehicular movements as follows: Residential Development: 700 vehicle trips per day depending on seasonal occupancy fluctuations and resident characteristics, plus non-resident recreation users. (factor of 4 trips/d.u.). The proposal site is served by arterial and major highways (thoroughfares) which are adequate in design capacity to handle the anticipated traffic volunes. 17. PUBLIC SERVICE (See Public Services Plan Annexation Area No. 10) 18. PUBLIC FISCAL BALANCE (See Public Services Plan Annexation Area No. 10) 19. UTILITIES The proposal site is within the planned service area of all utility companies and will not require new systems to be established. The proposal will place a minor incremental demand on the provision of public utilities. 20. HUMAN HEALTH The proposal will not pose any specific health hazards or effect the level of community health care. Project occupants will become health care consumers, but it is noted that the doctor to patient ratio within the area is more than adequate to accommodate population increases. 21. SOCIAL SERVICES The proposal is not anticipated to place significant demands for social services, based on projected occupant profile. 22. AESTHETICS The proposal does not involve obstruction of scenic vistas, or creation of an aesthetically offensive site; it will establish a neighborhood character of its own whose attractiveness, pleasantness, and uniqueness will be the subject of the City Design Review process. 23. LIGHT AND GLARE The proposal will not involve the significant use of night lighting. 24. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL The proposal will not effect any known or recorded archeological or historical resources. 25. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE The proposal is not found to have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment. The proposal will not impare achievement of long term environmental goals. The proposal involves minor incremental impacts which are not considered to be cumulatively considerable when viewed in the planned perspective of City development. The proposal does not pose any adverse environmental impacts on human beings. CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report on: Consideration for Initiation of Pre -Annexation Zoning -- Annexation Area No. 10 Annexation Elynor Falk, c/o Robert D. Rudnick, Attorney at Law Petitioner: 265 North Indian Avenue Palm Springs, CA 92262 Reserved Case No.: C/Z 02-79 Date: March 14, 1979 I. REQUEST: Annexation to the City of Palm Desert; and, RM (Mobile Home Park and Mobile Home Subdivision Residential District) zoning, stipulating a maximum density of 4.4 units per acre, for approximately 40 acres generally located between 42nd Avenue and Merle Drive, east of Rebecca Road. LOCATIONAL MAP: Staff Report - Case C/Z 02-79 Page Two March 14, 1979 II. (cont.) The RM zone requires Conditional Use Permit approval for development, therefore, an agreement as to the density could be regulated at this point. The effect of any Commission action to prezone the subject property would involve an interpretation of the General Plan Land Use Element. The area has generally been depicted as a portion of the Sand Dune Park. The boundaries of the Sand Dune Park were later redefined by adoption of the Parks and Recreation Element in July of 1978; leaving the subject site without a specified use. Service Industrial land use is depicted to the east of the site, and the surrounding area residential designation is Medium Density Residential, maximum 5-7 dwelling units per acre. It is probably more reasonable to assume the underlying site use (once the park boundaries were pulled back) to be residential. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The petitioner would like to see an early resolution of the land use question and requests . that it be considered at your April 18th meeting. Staff does note that there is a time limitation fixed for the City to act on Petitions for Annexation, and therefore, recommends that the Planning Commission initiate a Change of Zone (Case No. C/Z 02-79), from 'S' Study to RM (U.A.), or any other zone deemed appropriate, by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. Subject to the adoption of this Resolution, Staff should be advised as to an acceptable meeting date for hearing, and Staff will then prepare the environmental assessment and complete Staff Report. ELYNOR FALK c/o Robert D. Rudnick Attorney at Law 265 North Indian Avenue Palm Springs, California 92262 714-325-5085 November 22, 1978 Petition to the Honorable City Council Palm Desert, California D E C 6 1978 PALM DESERT CITY HALL CITY CLERK'S OFFICE In accordance with the annexation of the Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35, 326, Elynor Falk respectfully requests the following described property be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the approval of the zoning and development plans in conformance with the adopted General Plan of the City of Palm Desert: The Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian EXCEPTING therefrom the East half of the East half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 16, ALSO EXCEPTING any portion lying South of the North line of Merle Drive as shown on plat of Country Club Village #I.'- by Map on file in Book 40 pages 9 and 10 of Maps ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom all oil gas, oil shale, coal, phosphate, sodium, gold, silver, and all other mineral deposits, as reserved by State of California in Patent filed for record February 25, 1948 as Instrument No. 3080. Dated this 22nd day of November, 1978. i Elyn Falk, P i Toner John Ballew David S. Bachanan Stephen A. Fleshman Robert McFarland AIA Dan Nicholl Rob Patterson March 9, 1979 Mr. Paul Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Eleanor Falk - Annexation Request of November 22, 1978 Dear Paul: In addition to our original request for annexation of 30 acres, we wish to add 10 acres to our original request. Further, we would request that the Planning Commission initiate pre -zoning on the entire 40 acres; from 'S' to R-M (U.A.). We will stipulate to a maximum of 175 dwelling units for a density of 4.4 units per acre. We would ask that this be set for hearing at your meeting of April 18, 1979. If you have any further questions, please contact me. Sincerely S SAF:klb A. Fleshman �, I kJ f�R BLVD.178A8 SKY PARK 740 5 EL PASEO SUITE AJ7 PALM EDE DESERT, CAL. 92260 VIA) W-5626 PLANNERS & ARCHITECT 5 CORPORATION ELYNOR FALK c/o Robert D. Rudnick Attorney at Law 265 North Indian Avenue Palm Springs, California 92262 714-325-5085 March 16, 1979 Petition to the Honorable City Council Palm Desert, California In accordance with the annexation of the Uninhabited Territory. Act of 1939, as amended, Government Code Sections 35, 300-35, 326, Elynor Falk respectfully requests the following described property be annexed to the City of Palm Desert, subject to the approval of the zoning and development plans in conform- ance with the adopted General Plan of the City of Palm Desert: Ten (10) acres more or less identified as County Parcel No. 621-400-007 in the East half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 5 South, Range 6 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, County of Riverside. Dated this 16th day of March, 1979. EryK6r Falk, Petitio er SS SMEM ROIL COINT�-F RIVERS21 i cwFRc aewc RECORDERS ZONE IRA PARCEL NO. LAID IM''RVMITS EXEMPTIONS ASSMAMTI lNlw.1g8i:1c .• •,�� - i - , •I 11 :1 b 11 I •.1 .1- 11 Lol1 1 WINTERS 1 �11 } II 11 al 111 I ?uPr4100 KPINN IN COWOR Cc"" LOT XX MAlk T6I: 1. .d N ENT IN COMMON AREA bIFATTA :] :]_Ak 1 It4SteINT I al 1 •. •r n ;11 } IIY 1 YI 9 /,] :a ... :. ... 11 I : 1 1 T OD41 • 1,1 1, 11 ::I 1. '.1..:1 11 I It a1 a1 I'14500 1 I44 M 1• l I � I/1 ;' er1 '1 h 'il '1 :O '/ 11 :V } ! iR 0 111 I . 1 i1.1... LOT H : I 1 1 I j Sl ;1 I,1 375U 51 III I,I I �•,. Ia., 4 ll .Ir34 I �/ 11 Fillip liml Y ^III 51 d1 4 LO' IN ^II '1 '1 ill ITT , ] ( 1II :1� .w III 1 ••.PRE03 AFFF:r s a^I1• 'I '1 ii1 -1 1� r ar• I 7. f3I 11 I 2: 9?r7lQ;l JRACT 4399 INT IN COP" AREA r ^II 51 ZSO 411 p 15e,.A• :Ir 1111 11 I :I• Iu'�uCAill.If PARCEL NO. LAND IMPRVM TS EXEMPTIONS ASSMT NET 21-583-OD6-7— t xloo . � 1 �T"�[ �1 iV ? • Ii 9i1 Y 4 .. • 1,11,1 HP -79 ASSESSMENT RCLL *N_:TY 6F- RIVERSIDE - - - I(OWNERS NAME • _ _ _ RECORDERS ZONE 7RA PARCEL NO. .34�D LAND IMPRvWTS EKEMPTIONS ASSET NET POR� LTO Nm W_ LUt TA MESAonvi , E Y PORT GOLFIDS ACT PT C/O JACK 1Y1 17TI + 7 RMS SY - -- X BEINETT- E ST STE COST, CA 6 RR A/m/ - — -- . -- _3ti. PORTOIA GOLF RAH(Xp$ LTD PT BEA• 59[A)S RNS _ _ 3 2� 9 EY'f 1V1 T7TT1 ST ST + 6/m/ SY- COSTA MESA, GI 9 6 + --- PORTOLLA GOLF RANCHOS LTD PT iY c •'rry Y— Yrc v �3RMS��� . u7n177 � .'�83 tY 3'CA _. --- ---' - P . a 099 INT 1. Comm I• 11' 11 11 `t 11 it ' PT 5 11 .1• •� 1 1 ri 1 it Sy 911 / :1 1 11 11 :. • / ' C a 071 G 1 •I♦ � 1 •11 1 1 11 1 1 '1 1. 11 11 L 1' "i . .. a •.!1.' II i �., ly '' .1.�•� :r r i 11 •n 1 v 'I a ; '1 •u} .r � r v1 l' � • 11 i l .1' 1' '11 ''3751 1 I 130+ 11 .a! •11} .I� 1 ' T 1 RECORDERS ZONE TRA PARCEL NO. LAND IMPRVPIITS EXEMPTIONS ASSMT NET OWNERS NAPE _QlgR/A!U-ff S SALE ANT ,.; � Ill rYl} •'li } • 1I /1 '1 '1 1 ♦ 1/11 [.� .1 1. I.J :III .1• ♦ IY 11SILK- 250 `I 'I' 1 11 P 1 11 % '1 /I. 1 izz Sy q 1/ 31 •1 I.J.. ¢' /Y} 1 ..1.. .: } ! u :. • . r.YJNllll/C :isI:13 S6{•31}F�. �! 1 `I fMVll n, rm L JI LJ(CCJ -eL"OT 145L_P�L- DESERT_ CA 92Jii1 ioT 7pa !B 000700�CQM— • 11 /fY1/77 YY _. ... ----- MAMDIC'T M MANOIC MYRLEEN C JT FSFRT 922E0 • 11/00/77 YY 15b Qi=3�R1i1=�-10[8 - -_..._ .._ �rA LOT re Cg1rtkT CLI.B VILU� BREIJER RICUTAll D R BREWER MOLLY E JT 2437i� - -. LOT FB COUNTRY CLUB VIL OUAILU BEVERLY W92260 _ pt Rl - —SOIi-750�--1750Ho LOT ,B COUNTRY CLUB VILLAGE M0.D EARL L HOLD ROSAFNE J LOT AB COUNTRY CUB V L GE BOLYOATJIAN LE, A - 315-- 8 WOMB RY L NILLIK R 95 IyCL CVL-�-- • S/00LOT 1 1RYNORlBI M - - -1i385—• / 7 GROV / F R FOR TOTAL — -- -- D H M BF39Y R f5045 Ul-4UU-LU(-Z VERDE • / /71 IT 9.77 • R 1 W N UNAWSEC 16 155 ROE TOTAL E A FIA C' / E LADESERTZRtESMI! G�5/0 GRANITE PL.PALM * 3/00/77 Cr 17.67 17 67;ACRE M/` IN POR NI! 1/G OF SEC 16 TSS R6E FOR TOTAL -PtbLK PT, tt:E-J 3SMa1f2 p9 - - ,,, mI 7250 17500. 6250 an 315 a75 15385 4910 18525 1.979-79 ASSESSMENT ROLL CO NIT Or KlVtKaiuc OWNERS NAME RECORDERS ZONE IRA PARCEL NO. LAND IMPRVMITS EXEMPTIONS ASSMT NET • - _SAME(=) -NOS LTD) - UItlEIS/ASMIS_ 5567$- _ SALE AMI _ _._ - 56)c . RTOU GOLF P7 tYr E 17TH cI STE 57W7 PP1 rR6F 180G �1-400.OT$-T A SEE 16 TSS FOR TOTAL _. D R WE _-- .. _ _ �...-•---_ UNITED CALIFORNR — 1 W41 621-40D-09-3210 210 WILSHIRE BLV LIES • !/'%1/ 7 rr _25 DESCRIPTION 5LE ASbt5bMS MAPS RT WEST COAST PHOPERT S 1 CR DC - 2-S--10505. .-_- 10505 1a16 BET!%XIT a WSNIi1GTq:_ ifT� CRES I POR NW 5 RIVIAL cf of VTTI'M SCE ASUTSORS MAP$ —94254�ba cvcuo X% Bi1X 105E OA 1 • A 9 2V. • 6/m/76 rr T "^_'!-TAX -TAX -TAX _NUN=iA%, P 0 -2T C-ER IN PCM / OF SEC 16 T S R E FOR TOTAL f R]PT ION SEE ASSES_ORS IMPS _ - 1 _-i-765- -- - _ )65 RIGBY ELMER C M5 S ACREM/L IN POR NW F SEC S R6E VOR TOTAL MILTING R G. SEEASSESSORSMAPSl ' 62�GT1 —i9Zi— a65' •Rl_ 4 MERLE DR PALM DESERT p DRIS OLL ROBERT R DDRh COLL SMIR Y G, - - 26115 C O R M TISCOLL, 74745 MERLL DR,_ LOT IB r T IN ON R LOW 11t 74 R1 74 LO RT L V _ Tn II'Mll I.. L. . '/ a • : I. % Y • . . P. '�• III IY 11 1114..1 +•• II .1 IIi . .L• :�RI J 1. Lr .:i. I V 4 b 11 1 III 4 RLE Olt PALM 1 I 'I_ it Y •1 P4 (1 • IT' i 1 [ f Rt d III 9 I TOBINSI r• yW b 11 I : ITII 11 .�� ltd 1 ft^ ^I^ '1•M b IY III TI IA IIr1/00/65 RI I - •1�• 11 - T^ S"1 I to �w •V V 11 w •11 DESFU 1 11 1'II i09 OLNTRY LLLUr t d .CLAW .I• II•. '1 A( HENRY 8 ^ R i. WILLOW'.DESERT-1.1 In 1,1 RI 17500. DESERT 922CO Rai T ^ M d 1 11 Ri 1000 LOT 175 M 14 11` LUUMIKY LLM VILt .LGERS tl '1' .w 11: y1 I 11RI N' :I ASSESSMENT L r RiVFR3IDF- - PAGE 201 RECORDERS PONE TRA PARCEL NO. LAND IFSTRITNTS EXEMPTIONS OTHER/A S ASSIR NET SALE AM • _ lt _ v RT J J 5/m/ R1 �09•'Q 32c cgiT 17THO _ 250500 . i OINTRr Um VILLAGE DESER 92260 Rr R �21-GT1-b10-! C505 1750w.1 17WO G DR PELN _ i q IKT VILLAGE T . IN R - -011-9 3A0 4515 1750HO Mc IIt 92260 • 11/En/69 RI _ �CA E �R iiSSiRf q1f�— N R J, IN rfi-758I2—b2��11�12�! 330 5020 1750Ho _ 2 EC 6p E 7/m/76 pips 9 COUCTRT CL VILLAGE 1 RI — - . 11TER E, SANDERS S JT - R — 52M 1750110 SSW 9 / COUNTRY CLUB WILLAM J =rNL 5M—0M ---- - -- 1750HO - 3770 - IRYI B CNVILL . E g226p R —51w ----1750w.+ 37V' B COGNTRr CU6 VILLAGE 1 ESTER L, CRAP ON S G, JT EES5EER� = A/m/ 6 R1 - S� _- _—..— _ 5u _ 24OW . DUS B OAO� V 31 49C0 tMAIDIA ruc • PALM scor E 12/m/ MINS R1 Y, &Q S ESTATES LA • 12/ /75 Rl eevi�iAA..-P • 1rw4Z T-41TZUTR� 624T— S 7 Tc AVE_ PALM DESERT 93260 =3166i96 Im ,�— S tj ��L �"faiV�RS?6F -- ONNERS NAME RE ORDERS ZONE TRA PARCEL NO. - -- - - - PAGE 202 LAND IMPRVMTTS EXEMPTIONS ASSMT NET SALE . S_ —___ 483, , 5$1_QLER42S5 750 841 _ - 1591 M,w_TAX , 750 841-- i59T NON -TAX -- -LQWjAz y� VeOV ELI Y-- PALM DESERT 3/OD/78 YY T 1 M INTRY CUO MILLAGE 1— / AME PHER �--- 74075 El PASE PAIR DE ERT- / /78 YYCA y4zw �T 145 re MIM9 C RY CLLS VILLAGE 1 --- R-Tv-ER�TD-E PA6E-203- -- - PARCEL NO. LAND IMPR I E%EfPTIONS §SSE ABET 3'f6-4IHE8L 310- I\• iPl ■\NIA arr•.I Ana :•%! :•••-'.�-,.� =1\• AA 7 it '1: J--)VTUA WIU A.IP'I . I'IIIPA,- Ou CM Al WOD/i /[ IJ •! .[ 1 I 1VZAJUK 1 a!rTM 9 4an 4 *120SIG'• 03•• ! 1 Y AU1UJ I+1 •, 'Y •! .0 1 1 / .r11,H 9 Man. 4 11 . [ M 1' I. Y I I• l :IIr Y-1 : !r r• •• Al 11 K I e 1' 1 [ 1 I I 411r29 dn. -10V I Y 1' 'I :III 1'I vi AA II .I D- 9 MJn. L ;;;E 11 9 Ma[ i anu. iv3 MIA .� I• r OSLLI 9 6. a.w4ri'mm nv3'dmm 'AWLW OTWU J IV39D)J lVVId n Irl •' III• I� I In 111/ 11 .: 1 4 9 an ♦ n 49 I• .[.[+ : m P I\ p :17 Ira : I • f I y II. I' 1�TA Pi 1 M 9 Ma. t1 1• !. el . �•' V • .II IYa I III I 1 1 1 I 1•l I I: 1 9 .1• J iv a u11 •01 1={li Y. r 1\ •r [ 3alcxltlH 10 .AT4ATO TW .%1 _ 1L4 • .11 hI 1 v wd 7 1 imlovisim•I: 1 vftNs i .11 1M1 Em It 1; III' I .r rlS)JOT y,I • 11 1' 1. / I ar I 1 1 Ir II •9 a. _ 1 ` • .\•.I •11 I 1 d • •\ 1; �Uj4q ph 1; p ! C[w1h wl^P^I rY I. 11 4 M•L 1 _"Y :II`"I :i1 i11 •� �•• 1; F i 1 jal 9 llr 41Y6 s II I'• :1L I ;II Ip1 I ' Y :lM 1 1; F I Ir aJ 9 a. 1' I.1• I. • I y11 lr�l I I: • I • !. 1 '. I' • :L .11 I iC4� uH.c— OH [ L--Sao— OLS 7-Zt10-27-29 ZMAZ In UD%71 It VYllaava afaaa • AJ14IVd mans IA Bll] 1M1N10) 94 10-1 �'Iz rvrYr me I -I( UO-F-L79 71rK1 lb L9 if M Y•Ilfl n••`"' .. '•rr' - — 197S79ASSESSi7EAT Y 7—ATVFit3I6i— - - PAGE 198 OYNERS NAME RECORDERS ZONE TNA PARCc1 NO. LAND INPRVIMTS EXE!PTIONS SSSSSE ANE RDDCA 92 11irnl67 al RE$$__INII_(] 51TU5 (II) SM1E (-) NO_ -DATE 115E AEBEACE 9�E�/�S�S- - - 4925 �DA�pI�SCDOLL J l-PA�CE.R K N R 75042 S9 i38 6 5J0 L• 95 7467 AR AVE PALM ESERT �750N0 ��'0 LOT d> re O40%OO9 EOINTRY 19 vILLAGE 1 ¢7— - 50D - -7500 KERPAN JOSEPH C, KERPAN VIRGlNI H, JT 2 - 470M . g� _pALM RT p�26n /M/7! RI OT 15 01,O70pq pN(TR( Y CLUB VILLAGE I __ _ __ _ JOHNSON N ON D JOHNSON VIRGINIA L R - 550 i!)30-1750H0 3610 17M GARY AVE_ 6ALN D 5 RT 97J(n a R/m/67 _R1 — — __._ - -- - - LOT re COU T CUB V LLAGE 9000 . MON m NORMAtI G 15 ��6i�c 392�if=6- _ 500-- -- ---- - -- - - - . i 6 CART AVE p DESERT 9920 N _ i MARTIN KERMIT 0, MARTIN DOROTNT J R-—-1750No_ b5 LOT 711 re UWIC09 CMNTRY CUE BERRY LEER 51W2 �4CSF)- _ pt — DESERT 9 pETERSON CARL E, PETERSON IV D -S9I�—SIi1-----_—_-2695- _tom . 75U42- low'39 • 11/00/7 Yr — -- -- - -louu----1DOD- • li/M/77 YY —------- • 11/00/77 YY - - - - _�,_ - ---- - - — -- 1000' YY ----. - . 1PACE 4�7, RECORDERS RCEL NO. LAND IMPRVWTS EXEMPTIONS ASSKT NET ^ l� - EE ilk } A 111 1 1 1 11 / yy i11 1 11 / �11 S ^II' 11 111 v p/1 Ii •' �' NI d ^L 111 111 VIP' C y Lr 'IIN .Y ^1 in In -ffmk&-4C:m LE 161 I 1-8 11 DATE 09-22-76 TRAN CODE DEEDRVDJ TO 1. TORREY HARRY Y L PAIL TO DATE 06-h21-78 CHG DATE O9.1}78 TRAIN CODE DEEDRVDS IT DOC ST81I 15.95 D FROM 1. Fm F MI LID TO 1. ATHERTON RICHARD B PAIL TO DATE 06IM71 CHI DATE 10-16-78 TRAM CODE DEEORV06 slyp Mln 12 PT DOC TO 1. NED INVESTMENTS MiLl CO VEYANCE M118FR 168%7 06/78 T E 0-M PT PT DOC STAMP AO IMIL TO ADDR 9570 WILSHIRE BLV STE 7CA BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 ASSESSMENT NO. 621594017-1Cdga'' 7- ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. PORTOLA MOLE RANCHOS LTD TO IQ E NMN MAIL TO AD" 5130 ORRVILLE AVE HOODlA1N HILLS, G 91367 NAIL DATE ASSESSMENT NO. 621594022-5 D CAR ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. PORTOLA GOLF RANCHOS LTD TO 11 NED INVE TMENTS Mv bit MAIL TO DATE 08-11-78 CHI ASSESSIPIlLPIT DATE 08-25-78ER TRN1 BODE DEED i� PT, JT DOC STAMP 14.85 TO 1. BECKOS HELEN J 2. BECKOS DIANE M MAIL TO DATE OS/17/78 CHIG I 1•. 'i 1'-M CjVTt7UF RIttRSIDEe M ' is .. , .. . 1 . • I !• 6 i.. .1 DATE 09-14-79 TRAIN CODE OEEDRVD7 =r 'i . , 1 1 �� 1... f::l ,.. 1: .I .. dJ :IA IP MOM I�11 �� 11 1 1 V j .�.., ....c lRr4Jr I0 CMG � A CONVEYANCE NUMBER 190,596 09/78 79 0-00 PT JT DOC STAMP 15.95 2. PRl1LS0Y M RGAAMAHEIN CARET L l - CONVEYANCE NUMBER168987 08/78 79 0-00 PT PT DOC STAMP xc INIL TO ADOR 950 YILSNIRE BLV STE 300 BILL TO DATE WII-78 CHIS BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 ASSESSMENT N0. 621601C09•-5 ASSESSEE CNANGm FRO1 1. PORTOIA 60.F RANCIIDS LTD THE 1 D M MAIL TO WTE W 11-78 CNG DATE 09-07-79 TRAM CODE DEEDRV04 r"Mij R 111 / 79 PT JT DOC STAID 17.05 TO 1. GUILFORD GUILFORD WILLIAt ORPMA W A MAIL TO DATE 06-02-78 CNG 11 ASSESSMENT NO. UIUJIU14-Y DATE 09-29-78 TRAM CODE DEEDRVD3 TO 1 .70N-WAVERLY CORP l RWill ATTN AM ANX AMR FAIL TO DATE 06-00-78 Chu ASSESSMENT NO. DATE 08-21-78 TPAI CODE DEEDRVD3 STAMP aa.00 CHANGED FROM I TIF Y ELLIS DOROTHY J TR Ell /AIL TO ADOR P 0 BOX 188 SEDRO-YOOLLEY, W 98284 ASSESSTENT N0. 621601022-6 r ASSESSEE CHANGED ROM 1. PORT0.A GOLF A1WC/105 LTD LLULUW i MAIL TO ADDR MIS1/2 23RD ST WESTMaNSTER, CA 92683 MAIL ASSES7A N0. 6216MG24-8 ASSESSEE CHANTED FROM 1. PORTOLA GOLF RANCHOS LTDHLSTLK 17.60 D PART 3. MESTER R A A D 6 JR Ali CONVEYANCE NUMBER 131148 06/78T 79 F R Pf JT F CHANGED = DOC STAR 14.85 ASSESS IV 2. WILLIAMS MIIRRAAGE CAM 92270 A CONVEYANCE MUBER — 208732 10/78 79r s e� IPT UM DOC STAR 14.85 MTIL TO J MIl TO AD011 8735 DELGANT AVE API 307 PLAYA DEL RET, U 90291 SSPW N0. 621l02009-8 T E ASSESSEE C/MMCED FROM 1. PORTOLJI GOLF TO RANCHOS LTD IMTL TO ADDR 12L20 LANSDOW OR [ASSESVqD(T EMWON ALB CAN T61WL5 00000 N0. 62160202Ir7 7 ASSESSEE [/NMCFD fA01 1. PORT0.A GOIf RANCIgS LTD T 2118 QV.4ER5A ' — PAIL TO DATE 07-2D-78 CMG DATE 08-25-78 TRAM CODE DEEDRVDL TAN R / 79 PI JT DOE STAW 2L.75 TO 1. COLD" ( ETIAN CHARLES FLORENCE M il MAIL TO DATE 05-14-78 CNG DATE 08-28-78 TRAIN CODE DEEDRVD7 C9MYANCE MER 101§31 /78 /9GULP CA && Pi IT DOC STAMP 24.75 _ J TO 1. MAYS 2. MATS DAVID SHERRY A J HAIL TO DATE 05-22-78 CMG / is i.. I .1 ASSES, i^l• ••1 y 11Y DATE I Ir f• ROLL ' � 1. A ... 1 • ..r M1 01TI-OT UVERSIDE I. �'. Call"li�v1', CA iE 2i •T 1 I MiLL L!11 1.1 1 fiq�• •. i.1 .1Q161111 Ir 1. 1 II B DO 1 fS ES Td. i• .;91 r N• .•1 1 :I: i1., u..l •, a.l �� 1 i r 1 p.1 1 1•.� I. 1 lyl,. •N1. 1 11 I: i111 .1 II 1 1 I... I. l• �.. :1 1 r 1 1 r,,1 ASSESa 11 '.:U•1•R r 1 �CWQ'"DFROM ASS(I� 1 rL.• To DATE I Ir r r blj . III r1, •1 1 .11 .1: •f1 1,ERT 1 .•1.1 r 1'ASSESWAIL CA .1 rPAIL ..Mill i'' f^CONVEYANCE WillI. I. 11 1 j.• 1 0 PALM DESERT. CA 1 1978-11 ASSESSOR'S ROLL UPDATE 4'493.78 COUKTY OF RIMVERSID DATE 09-15-78 TRAN CODE OEEDRVDI TO 1. DESERT VALLEY LTD MIL TU ADM MIL CA TO DATE Olri 78 CMIG " 9D5U5 ASSESSES CHANGED FROM 1. DESERT VALLEY LTD MIL TO DATE 09-07-78 C11G " DATE 10-02-76 TRAM CODE DEEDIIVD6 ASSESSEE 01AMED FROM 1. VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PAW TO 1. NELSON KAL MIL TO DATE 07-W78 OIG " ASSESSMENT DATE 10-01-78 TRAM CODE DEEDRVD2 --"T&SSEE CHANGED FROM TO 1. PELA.ICCE SVEND A A A CONVEYANCE NUMBER 093784 05/78 79 0-00� NO RK DOC STAMP 60.50 MIL TO ADOR P 0 BOX 267 SANTA ANA, CA MAIL TO DATE f)S-127-71 CHG 92701 ASSESSMENT NO. 621622DIDATE 10-19-'M DE ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK 1 PORTLAND ELECTRIC i PLLMING INC " MIL TO DATE W22-78 CHGASSESSMENT NO. 6n&ZZrX=Z'— C8-22-78 TRAN CODE DEEDR'VD7 DATE YANCE NUBER 1 71 7/78 79 FI DOC STAMP .00 F'AWPT TO 1. AARTIK MMEMBMAN WRTIK NATALIE B TIE 4. FIELD RUTM MIL TO NAME MERMAN WRTIK ET ALC/O LAIHEURAL MIL TO DATE 07-25-78 CIIG Lily, CA YZ134 i..10 DFFDPROC ACC-PlULAIU ANKAL DATE 1: ME ca Y k • 1 1. 11 J 11 �1'1 ,: R :r W. a MAIL TO \lil }.i.. �iFiTOWDIL ASSE CATE 1 1 a11 FJT S1. STAMP60.50 1 � V,,. v IMTE W21-WCHG NO DOC STAMP 24.75 PAINO JOSEPHINE 9 669 FA Ii CONVEYANCE Nl16ER 136266 07/76 79 0-00 T IA7 DOC STAMP 2t.75 T IFRANCNu LTt MAIL TO ADDR 73190 EL Pi STE 5 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 _ MAIL TO DATE 07-03-78 CIIG -- ASSESSMENT NO. 6215810/ DATE ' 1 TRAM E DEEIPER DRVD6 ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. FARBER JAMES C TO MERLIAN QENMIA C 3. MOOSIAGIAN 1. SOIIDIERO CRAIG JOSEPH D 8 - - MAIL TO ADDR 12 NARCISSE DR RANCHO Pi VERDE, CA 902744 MAIL TO DATE 14-78 CHG L —� PASE-15'�"--1 i 114WJ PRPAJ020 DEEDPItO[ ACCIl11LATED JOL'4NAL --� I�A"SS'EfS�FGP'fAR-7J19;A DATE 09-15-78 TRAN CODE DEEDRVDS 2.TO 1. DIFATTA Y /MIL TO ADDRDATE 42552 GRANITE PL Iii To rMG IWEl MOT PALM DESERT, CA 92260 ASSESSMENT NO. 6215820/ :111, 4-111 TARN CODE r ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. PORTOU GOLF RAN[105 LTD MAIL TO ADDR 1071 0511ZEAST KINGSLEY POMONA, CA DATE A 91767 1 PAIL [C ASSESSMENT No. 62158WD4-5 CONVEYDATE ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. PORTOLA GOLF RANCHOS LTD JOI 3. TOWSEND HOIACE J FAIL TO ADDR 3678 4TH AVE SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 HIS ASSESSMENT Ni 6215840M-5 Y ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. RAAF THEODORE J ' TO 1: U—HL RUSSALETH M MMlI TO DATE 07-18-78 CHW DATEµ 29-78 R TR 7 CODE DEE3 79 PT JT DOC STAMP 12.1 TO 1. SMITH ITH SHERMAN LADY A F MAIL TO DATE 06-29-78 CHG . _ _ M ��rT�r a - _ ewr�•• K —�p71�1I ASSESSOR'S ROLL UPDA —T9IGC151< DEEDPROC GATE 6D-29-78 TRAY CODE DEEDRVD3 AM6FR 102AA6 05/76 79 ACCTMILATED o-m TC JT nIRNu _" DOC STAMP 11 95 J �IAFAiED FROM 1. RAAf 2. RAAE IMcwucc JOCELYN J E WILKENS 2. WILKENS RJ MILDRED M L 11 CONVEYANCE IAIBEF N 102666 OS/76 79 -CO(IJT JT - DOC STAMP 15.95 WIM TO 1. WILKINS M BIRJA — M MIL TO A FAIL TO DATE 05-23-7E C/IG 7-1 DATE ps-2b-76 TRIW CODE DEEDRVD7 TO 1. KOCH 1NLTER K L R Y FAIL TO DATE 05-22-78 CHG ASSESSMENT NO. 621554Mb-Z DA : 09-20-76 TRAM CODE DEEDRVD3 T 24.75 - GOLF TO 1. OBRIEN pSAN A&b NOW" M — MAIL JORANIS, MS FAIL TO DATE 06-10-7e CHG ' DATE 10-16-76UD TRAN [OOE DEEDRVD6 Y T T DOC TW1P 75 2. STIPANOV TO I MCCREERI' MAE ROT L RAIL TO ADDR 71133 EL PASEO FA 1-7 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 ASSESSMENT N0. 621565CV-6 DATE 1 1 TRAM CODE DEEDRVD6 ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. PORTOLA GOLF RANCHOS LTD TO 1. CARADIES KENNETH M MAIL TO ADDR 1223 4 MAK21M AVE NAIL TO DATE 7-7E ONG FULLERTON, CA 92633 I 1:22-78 Id 'i'1. A.1 .1' Li• TRAM E DEEDRVD7 I(,Ir 1 4 F �' 1-i J '.1. I 1..11 �1^2E W1n 1 . ri7TT14 YiLF vlkNUO To 1. WILLIAMS EDWARD 0 iRA TE VAIL TO DATE1 1r i a`i I'79 CHGASS 71 .✓ DATE 1 v .�11 1. 1111 li (• l .11 ..1 i^1. P• � 1. 1 .� MAIL 1MAIL TO DATE :i• ...a ii. 1� i .� 1• DAjj I• 'T • 1 -•��•��� ••-••,Y, •PTO 1. JOINSO/ --gbiU Y L VAIL TO DATE 09-11-78 CNG TRAN CODE DEEDRVDI STAMP 27 5p 2. JARES DOROTHY N TR ZOM9-27�78 , TO N ERICK 8/22/78 DEL' 022-6 TRAN CODE DEEDRVD< TAMP TO 1. WOLF HERBERT J f A/NA WAIL TO DATE 06-26.78 CHG DATE 09`29-7S TRAM CODE DEEDRVD3 PT AC DOC STAMP 20.35 TO 1: IRIDSOI IIARREN Y MAmALEN AD R i. A. CROSTHIAITE ;NFP N MARGARET HABRA CA E 631 A Wq 1665CONVEYE 08/78 79 NB- 0-00 PT JT DOC STAMP 20.35 A E D FRQI 1. PORTOU GOLF RANCHOS LTD 2. /10110RTN ALBERTA i WAIL TOT15 ADDR 5 5 DOAN LN OCEANSIDE CA 92054 WIC .• 1 1 nTe . '• •• i• ef-VVIANCAS TO 1: MARSHALL INVESTMENTS p 1 '11 Al 0 2/ • 11: 'A 1 'I .1 .-4 ISSEST•.! 1 CONVEYANCE.35 7 f, I • ,1 111 D 1 : ] J.J FRacdQ HipArs CA d • IL TO PAIL I�I� - 'J1. `.9J .! CONVEYANCE NUSER 91 1. 7A.. ' 1.' T 1 11 PT JT .! P DOCSTAMP 20.35 SSE EEEE--V�& �1` i • i• • - 1! 1 grim •. as .! ..• YAWE• KUSER 133491 I. 1 11 PT JT DOC 27 Jl ,Yi I 1 IL MOAK, 1•. a' 14 �� p. CONVEYANCE WINDER,1 .In i. . ••, 1. •I 1 111 .• • � a\. .11 r 1 .r 1.. ]. r, 1 •1. I' J. DATE 10-30-78 TRAM CODE DEEDRVD7 D . MAR C TO M 1. RgIUL W EAS XORD P D A. FALK ELYNOR MAIL TO DATE 09-22-78 CHG DATE 09-Z1-78 TRAM CODE DEEDRVD3 TO 1. PALM DESERT 210 LTD TO NMI �AMO*CQRP NEWPORT BEACH, CA MAIL TO DATE 07-10-78 CHG DATE 09-06-78 TRAM CODE DEEDRVD2 S S TO 1. PORTOLA GOLF RANCHDS LTD MiL7 L DATE 09-21-78 TRAM CODE OEEDRVD3 DOC TAMP .00 TO 1. PALM DESERT Z10 LTD MAIL TO DATE 07-10-78 CHG ASSESSMENT NO. 6Zl4lTUW( DATE O8-14-78 TRAM CODE DEEDRVM Np 7 DOC TAMP 52.25 TO 1. GARCIA STEPHANIE MOORE TEPHEN J C MAIL DATE IW25-73 TRAM CODE KEDINK YAN R / 79 W TAMP .00 b.JT TO 1. GAARCIA STEPXOE "IE J MAIL TO DATE 05-16-78 ADD ASSESSMENT NO. 6ZI411UZ7-4 DATE 10-03-78 TRAM DEEDRVD6 MB79 0-00 JT P1 CONVEYANCE AER i CODE 7/78 DOC STAMP 37.40 2. WIIE MRIA, TO YESTHOOD LAND t INVESTMENT CO X JI PT MIL TO DATE 07-10-78 CHG 11 DATE I. 20, CODE bEEDRVD7 = TvTjt5 MEP 7 1�11 ,Irl V- ST!10 HOX EXEMP 1.1 ASSESSEE CHANGED a - COUNTYROM -- -_. PAGE 41 aeCW NET 1 1 �1f 1 . .! 1 f ..I �..� ' ili 1 1l\.P 1 .1. Ih. luf ai .y { V UIY , I. i �•i 2 �-�• a l } } IY '1 1 :f CA 2.12 MEEK ' il.: • 1 1 1'S MkPS • L�m1 :1 1 b i 1 I 11 I yl. TOTALTAX 9 J WADSWORTHL..f •.^ i,t 'IY b i 11 9 LOT 1 .T. 1 t j 11 VALLEY INDWTRM I }•r 11 / IP 7502762I D 1111 •TTi• IACT 5ZZ4 1111 VALLEY INTRIAL • � •/ 5751: d 11Cy �I •� �itL 1111 1,1 i ..11 .1 . LOTI :1: I 11/ LOTIT i• •i 321 :1 IP rAh: 47500, 1 I11••1 . 1111 - VALLEY Im"TRIAL 51 11•. ••11 111 f .JPM' II 11 [. I I21.T 1 1 •A. In 11 . 1 .J •!.. L • • I :1. 1 I MAUREr a 1 11 J f .I •: 1.•. I� :.f� :•1I 1 .1 •Ir � .1 ^•"rIu .' .,1 1 Ila 7 .2I.T ;/7 f5ZZ4 • 1 .p 1 1 ": IG:1' 0 �1111 1,. �!•`I • yIW �I♦ RT 922 np 11 'I 1 1111 41111 III 23 Pe 1. I lY/Cry w>x3 r . .I.. — .......... RECORDERS ZONE TRA PARCEL NO. LAND EXEMPTIONS ASSMT NET OWNERS NAML - - RFArJ- ��IIM�PRVVWTTSS_ �07d5 SALE /1ti;.� L Wis . P LOT Z4 M LMIU I I TRACT ALLGOOD AL 922A0 • `1 p T CT vY — ------ - I INY ORAL CITY, IP-1_ 7 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL PT NNT T1 [ATFEDRAL [ITT, CA • VALLEY jNp15TRUL PAfK PT4 P LO7 !6 T CT —�0 -VALLEY IMUSTRIAL PAW PT 41 • 2 IP 1 _—� LOT MB / T TRACT % j flew I 1 P QF2QZ� DATE TRN1 CODE 11111, /-—SWNSCEEE Q-_SFAJT DOC STAMP 9.90 ynDE7E0DRV5D6V) VKvtGL 2. CORDOVA OLGA i 111AI1 TO ADDR 53 BELVA LN RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 ASSESSMENT NO. 621383034-4 ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. MILKOVICH MILAN UU MAIL TO DATE 09/:9/78 DEC Y DATE 79-15-78 TRAN CODE DEEDRVD6 % EXEMP DIET 79 S 2. GORDON A/N H CONVEYANCE NUMBER 13533D 06/78 79 0-00 SE SE DOC STAMP .00 R8 RT WAIL TO ADDR 2733 CAMINO DAL FAR DEL MAR, CA 92014 IL TO DATE 06-30-78 CHG ASSESSMENT NO. 621391023-9 A 1- D 1 Y IA ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. CRAWFORD 10 off BARRY ARMAND ASSES NT CODE DEEDRVD3 CONVEYANCE NUMBER 102734 05/78 79 ASSESSEE CHANGED FR; 1 DAV3 0-00 MS FI HOMER DOC STAMP C 48.40 NOX EXEMP DLET 79 2. DRISCOLL fER SON SHIRLEY PAUL G D WAIL TO ADDR 17" ASPEN VILLIAGE WY MAIL TO DATE 78 ADD NEST COVINA, CA 91791 ASSESSMENT NO. 621392005-6 DATE -78 TRAM CODE DEEDRVD4 U_W--.� ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM1. CJMBCE TO 1, fAODMAN TO ROSE HA H I JI MAIL TO ADDR 670 N STEVENS MA T DATE 6- )8 CHG PALM SPRINGS, CA 92262 1918-11 11 -7 ASSESSOR'S ROLL UPDATE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PAGE 144 4M DATE 08-21-78 TRAM CODE DEEDRVD3 RRY 2. BERRY Y LINDA S MAIL TO AD" 73744 ANY 111 11 TO DATE ADD N PALM DESERT, -A 92260 ASSESSMENT NO. 621392041-8 ONV Y R ASSESSEE CHANGED FROM 1. MOM?AN MS NO DOC STAMP Lu NDAAN G MAIL TO DATE 05- 2-78 ADD DATE OB-28-78 TRAM CODE DEEDRVD7 2. JOINSON NEYfpN D IN LOT GG MB 077/031 TRACT L399 IIIT IN it x 1p f-lit.7tS ii ,• 1 11 I 1 IT.? 1 1 051 ,v 62IIY 1 I • : IM 1 • i 4 1 m1 l : :!. 1 11 71p 'IY ,i ,� j 11 IL - U551UII TRACT y .. I 11✓/i i '/ 11 11 I ItT : T I . r52N- 11.•• i '/ 31564 d 11 IP 75027b Y ii LL LOIIiJ: i' I INVU51RIAL PAW FrrI 'Ir d' b 11•. IL I �: j i • 47M PALMDESERT CA92260 iVLAY"E" W 1 11 UMILTII TROKI ALLT I •' T.I Ir. ; 11' 'IY .r } ii. 1 'i1 •11 1. 1 ALLRE11, DEL SOL. 11 1�11 -1 Kf-L ElUIT OWNERS NAVIE RECORDERS ' ZONEi USE ACRFAGE I LAND IMPRVWTS EXEFIPTIONS OTHFRIAtMT �I . 'IY ; 1 1?? 1 i1: 92 S .L' 1 jj11 I�11 • .)i L� t 11 .111 1 It?:T 1 �. ,Z IY 6 Y i �1 ilil ijil 1 0l, O •1 11 CY 1?t,•I• VALLEY INDUSTRI PAW PT , } 1 11 IP "IY .Y b 1 j 111 1111 LOT Y IT.T. I • Im 'yY �' j %jj1 100 - •I, ITT: I 1 I15271- TER IP 750271 31 11250 1? . I ' J 11 "IY / b i Il 1 I . i. . LOT : IL? .1 jPlLLUOI 11 / ry :.I. MUj:1 I?t.I 1 7 T- 'T'' - n1 I• } 1. 51 } w i .� IL 1 • LOT IIi7j T Y V1 :J DESIV1 1 t. 51. .6 1.-f 103751 __.__ �._..., ...� .._.�.. 44L•�Iarll.lt `iG. iC1aII:flltfp 1Ffr1 rr. �,� , , ,,, ,,, =�.t „ . Ty LA L a a.iLikit.', �I,�=fi ,,, ,,, , FSERT- CA 977 • 11/m/77 YY — —' LOT re LUUN RT• V LLAGE I_ BREWER RICKARD R BREWER MOLLY JT 243719 R -- i750LL0 LOT re MAIL U BEVERLT OLNTRY CL' V L W _ R1 - 75042 621-393-M5q--3M---fq)0--i�H LOT MOLD EARL L W0.D COWRY CUB V LUGE D,SE JT e 96878 Rl 7513C.F-Gr-30PUT-1 --�- - —_ LOT re COUNTRY Cu BOYAJIAN LEO, BOY 1 Y a 79255 / -Al r5O42 - --- LOT W11MY HILLIKSR ���{y► ILLIKER 5WXr Q-$Q1 C a 5/00/LiT B7S— LOT i{ ME p(O7pp9 RT CCIB VILLAGE-i— T OR"tea 519 • 7 TT - - 30.00 _ - A4t5 IN e95 N 1/i 16 T5S R§E FOR TOTAL Vt5LlPl ION SEE k�7i VEC A55E --- DUNN WA ROTONDA DR NM- RANCHO PALOS VERDES, OIQQ171 YY 9.77 _ � ��---- -- -- 71_.- ON / NAR 11R A E _ SSN TH 4 1 GRANITE PALM • / /7 Cr > - 17 7;ACR M/`4 IN POR MV 1/4 OF SEC 16 T55 R6E FOR TOTAL- �[ lIS5ESY0R2�1R3 375M , 6250 8000 315 - e75 - -15385 49m I SK25 "MP 1975-79 ASSESSMENT ROLL L(X)MIT Vr N1vcK"Ut • • ••- -•^• OWNERS NAME RECORDERS ZONE TRA -D��l$E_ACBE9G.`. PARCR NO. LAND IMPRVWTS EXEMPTIONS ASSMT NET 971iE1LASMIS_ SALE AHT catn-__�_ ADORES PORT0. FF lTD T Wmm F2. 55675 55675 ALTI JAMH PWND • CA 910�7� t... SIT-K, 475m9/ �' [Y� 59 88 • --_-_— — - - C A AtS FOR MAL UNITED RM 1 W41 621-40D-M9-3 210 210 WTL 5hlRE BLV -L05—* L/^(1/ YT 2A - - --- -- — — E 1n OF SEC 16 TSS RAF FOR TOTAL DESCR PTION SEE A5SE55U95 MAPS WEST C ST RT CR 11 - 2-i 10505 _ 10505 1 A16 BEY„ONi R6 NY WSHI�/GTpi" DC: 12.11- CR S I POAL m 5% R TOR __ O B A CA 927;/• • 6/m/76 YY 1 --TAX P XX1tl56 COACNELL At �Mjl IN PGA 1TIi7iOFIff-W SS R FOR 70TAL rotmrnK ccc A<Scc�roS ,MPS 1 -7--765— RIGBY EVER C /6 • • — ACRI 5 IN POR MW 0� T S R6E OR TOT MPS RT- Ci1 J '3>ti39Zi- 4265 NUTTING R G Rl G 1�7Fm P DR PALM DESER DR3 0.L R R DR ISCOLL MAPIPRL YYTI G,AG' AIMIM - 1 -5785 25700 0 R Y - OBIMSON R �— _ T4 R1 LOT T . •.- .: � .,.Amro rn RrrRr n LB V31_IAGE 1 --��—r..�—��...� -�.-. cT ME, w I /U31 TRACT434ri 1RT IN E"M AREII���� - - — - [9C9c1•_CLiiii^35 ni RtltTJiid�:i OWNERS NAME RECORDERS ZONE TRA PARCEL NO. LAND �tIIMP�RVWTTS EXEMPTIONS ASASLNETAPIT ILc ADPORTt�L57�t,OLv R7CPT / A JACK H BF3NETT _-130 E it• -. - ------ _ --- - - LVO SA, CA-4Zb77-- LOT 25 M 077/031 TRACT LS99 INT IN [DFTx•I PORTOLA G HDS LTD AREA NMS sy _ _3 . _ - _ - -- ---- 3750 ' _ COSTLOT17 • F-� 3A0 _ 375[J PORTOLA GOLF RANCHOS LTD PT FINS r___- --- [OSTA MES , LNT LN COMM AREA - _ _3 ------ - -13500- PORTOLA GOLF RANCHOS LTD, Pl __ Sy = 135Sp_. LOT M 1TRACT4Irlri ARLA _ _ SONO 2250- ALLEN NELEN M, NS �M 1���i—b2 00 • 1//78 Sy ' L --- SI1QL1_ l0T MB RACT L N ?ov& AREA _ _ _ OSIIE VALLACE J, OSLIE M84 ppg C� q�7ry, 175695 INIWWR RMS . L ACRES FI/L N l0T >•: TRA'T OSLIE WALLACEJ, OSLIE ;! M� AMS 1 - in r 65m ACRES N LOT TA N C _ INVYSEGE GORDON H, NEAVYS GE /U1 D JT - 501y-_Z 14500 R S F.ILL IN L90AT, 93 FBIN] IN TDmN/ w- IM41 +375U- EMES, wgqw 03cr 1J L 1 • 1 /77 Y -1J ��- OV A D RT A + 1 / /77 Y 1 _ 115QQ-, R �AARt— / /7 Y 145M R 11 VIA A 511911 ER A • / / 6 Y 1L __ - - AREA L R (►HEERSSNAME RECORDERS ZOf+E TM PARCEL N0. L� __IrPRt1'T'FTS E%-__ EfPTIC'NS SAL SM T NET t coNSXY EDWRD SUc0u5XT t L J Co 92q+ "q/7 Y 1 _ 5-O�IHCH[EZ/�I.-�"- CRE /1/l N LO TRA T 1 IN pT10N R I R Y. :, J - --3750 - - Z$Q— = -Tl FCR N N �J _ --. acre—rn�w •r-- �7CA - __ 3uum — i IV- na Pur V kill U67 �a- Rol 11 lit I't'81 ltilil RS. Im IM11.w ICMI >fC^f)f0 C.M. Is" fCl w �t r CA, 75 '7, /eol, 7Jt3 b+/ N 2 SEC /6 � f QO B 9 /7 P/LN oEtEwr [isr c/r//! /R J9Iw �f I /9 OZOAC' 1 i CSC ® _--- �� I>•.wr•r! S �9;4*N-n - /tlfk! --fr— PL: .•A' /lw T5S. R.6E. 0 ( T ) I C"(; SEE MAP 39 meow OU 3�0 SEE MAP SEE MAf SEE 43 ASSESSC RIVERS/1 1967 .. yr IrT Ap n Mlw6if FPRCEFf1T�T— -- --- -�tl 7M47-621-393-005-9 lulu P O BOX 145 P DESERT CA 9 n 11 I/ 7 YY LOT 17T�g��(L i�-- KWIC TFI(iAfl� _.lam P O X 14 P D ERT CA 9 11! /77 TY LOi NC: - - PAGE 199 OWNERS NAME RECORDERS ZONE TRA PARCEL NO. LAND IMPRVMJTS EVEMPTI A ��L $j _ M T O1MER/ASM(5 NOMA$ WW C MYRL N J R aZ1�OS-�7-1 Iwo nnHD• S M MYRL J T �5�42 h2f-393�08 Z 1000 LO BOX 14j;'w I� SFRT� < 11/ / 7,',�_- LIT COUNTY CLUB 6 8� ILLA IC M DI MY EN C J =39T-06�3 1000 L Y V LACE 1— e 11/00 - MYRL .DI MON JT R -393-010.3 1000 1452! LOT COUNTY L 12 4 MANDI TNOMAS M " "YRLEEN9 ee W R + 17/m/77 YY �iT- -[T-i9 0 1 TOO- _ L rE C Y V P BREWER RICHARD R REWER MOLLY E JT R - -., -500- 83w 17 LOT MB COUNTRY LLUUPVILLAGE S ILLA BEVERLY A W I(r ncccoT o>Jan = 1/ /7A R1 - �7 L MB Y CaJNTRY CL VILLAGE HOLD EARL L WOLD ROSANNE J Rl = 750Q ---� LOT !6 C RY 1L J BOYAJIAN LEI, Y I Y R - - S1i —. L T Y HILL R N 9f2d0 - 5/00/77 YY -�i��F9 875 _ 11l 111 r IMPW 1N I n I 11c .I- 1 _...EL M _ _- C79�K.1f RITONDA DR A206. RfyWZCZF61pO PKOS N 'MK MER /4-b�$Ei-1sT� p A Ml1 C pPM�ARj NRIESMITH 4f510 GRANITE PL 1 LIN yzdcu 17,67 0.CR M/ N = W 1/4 OF SEC 16 1 a -- 1Y/YIY AbZtZ3MMI �c ca•ann Vr navcw avc OWNERS NAME RECORDERS ZONE TRA PARCEL NO. yAj I(•) ���Ut tN)-SAME C=)962FPOR 0. GOLP R�1105 LTD PT RM - CubT D R WIT .FORK , R Z WILSHIRE IBkV- LOSS x ALML.28 _ S C D RZPTZDN SEE A55tS5VKb MA CNS T NET SALE AMT 1000 1000 t000 1000 t000 50Ho 7250• 37500. Soho - 625D ' __.. R000 315 A75 - -- ----PAGE 200 LAID IMPRVMNTS EX".TIONS ASSMT NET 55675�TASKS_ SALE5�5 - -210 - - — 210 '.. :rglliM4l.lf.1{AU a r,A •'i :�91•�,R DESERT22 75W b 11'F PII i • •CULWRY cLUB VILLArE • 1 1 ii^ 'IrF b ji• '•1 ' 1 d -AS A 4 1_�u1: :I .I I 9+� ! 1. .T j mm�t UK .. PALM... a :!!.: 1 11 :I I I"• : I,r ,1 VILLAGE:1 1 i' 'I•• :I i 11 OPIS ii� •IT .� 1.. r .2\ •I 11.. 11 :1 �RL R1 :1 • : 1� 1 Ili 41W :VILLAGE 1 _ WAKMtR MANLY^11 'lIF !. ,a raA wimr11U167 :1 : YEWPLAIE i PALM �•111FW4Z .' 1 91 rKtT _ :1 !1 LIN ,: I PALM DtbtKl !1: 1 I 1 11 I �: I.11 11• il•I•' 1: 1 N 29W 52M i590 1755 —nso .2ww. . 4265 4725 55M 8500. ME 1975-79 ASSESSMENT ROLL COLNTY I l OWNERS NAME RECORDERS1 ] I. LAND IMpRVNNTS EXalPTIONS 1. r r : i i . 2PaI ! +IiF 1 i :1 ROB .v LOT 17 n 04FJIULIY-•1• 1 F • i la•11 'I 1 • 11 r'1 HOFF^, I [ 5I4F b 1 '1 'II '/ I I• , 1 11 :1 RET LA : �Y•: 11 1 •1• 1 IT li' Vt PACIFIC .ICS RI 75042rF '1 ,Y IYI•- 290Al Riii :1r ! r.l " I rr7 n a, ;Jrl _ 4266 11 Rl 75D42F ;i .F IY •.} 4225 )R PALM :1 AK MANG :LF ,F Ir CI 4^S r1_1 : Ili .11: A 1 RA I . , • T I i. •' 11'4 •1 .l r, 11 / "QF :I } IYlr. 'i 1 (1'1 `I I .. ' �' c 'ij • IT'r C VILLAGE VAN '� u . 7 RI F•�1 �L•.... .IVF '! `L .I 7Tr 'D A i V� :P M 11 RI rF I a n 1 11 I ir.., is r r t ] 1 -n3U-MERLE OR: 'r' r :1 I •F •: P4ii� ril�•1: 1 11 Il1��Sr(a:=21a�Ii;�.R2.lA.flada[P�j�711a!!�1►itL1.1( 'P t' v '11 Y 'i"1 .Mil „ �IGErt3I6T--- �F 154 PARCEL NO. LAND I►PRVWTS EX9FTIONS SNT NET AL LIT wf�tAl A P' r '.1 O• h I • I 1' - A1'TOTAL a 111 DESEVIVICK .1.:. MAW J`1 11 . I11 '111 11 I 1 Ir t I5 At .,. 4. t 1 ORTOTAL j IFSCra-TICH M MAPSGARBER 1 _ 474-T, DR PM •39.ig ACRES K/L IN r'•NE 114 OF SEC 9 T55 RbE FORFTUIAL •I 111 TJESClPIWM ...:. . • a t'� 1 .l}{{�� {�� �IYz=�19�1 1 .1111 111 41, - My 1 llma I. Hawkins +2564 Rebecca Rd. ?alm Desert, CA 92260 521-391-002-0 dillard M.Cronin i2532 Rebecca Rd. ?alm Desert, CA 92260 521-391-003-1 >eo. D. Winn 74-515 Merle Dr. ?alm Desert, CA 92260 521-391-004-2 ;has. V. Logue 74-531 Merle Dr. ?alm Desert, CA 92260 i21-391-005-3 ?eter Capriotti ?3522Twin Springs In. )iamond Bar, CA 91765 521-391-006-4 Samuel J. Smith P.O. Box 13 Palm Desert, CA 92260 521-391-007-5 ferome F. Allen 74573 Merle Dr. ?alm Desert, CA 92260 i21-391-008-6 foseph R. Youngdale [205 Nautilus ,a Jolla, CA 92037 i21-391-009-7 >idney F. Burns S56 N. Clark St. .os Angeles, CA 90069 i21-391-010-7 tichard M. Call ?038 N. Hobart Blvd. .os Angeles, CA 90027 i21-391-011-8 )rva L. Brown 14-621 Merle Dr. ?alm Desert, CA 92260 Christine E. Reynolds 1065 S. San Rafael Ave Pasadena, CA 91105 621-391-013-0 621-391-014-1 Virginia J. White 9558 Swinton Ave. Sepulveda, CA 91343 621-391-015-2 Kenneth L Krall 42-550 Audrey Cir. Palm Desert, CA 92260 621-391-016-3 Shirley G. Driscoll 1220 Lyndon Apt. #4 South Pasadena, CA 91030 621-391-017-4 Ed Gerhardt 74-683 Merle Dr. Palm Desert, CA 92260 621-391-018 5 Fred A. Hoffman c/o J. Mulvahill 2616 1/2 Via Mar Marina Del Rey, CA 621-391-019-6 Mariann B. Henry 15355 Sunset Blvd. Pacific Palisades, 621-391-020-6 90291 Isobel M. Dunn 3200 W. La Rotonda Dr. #2C Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 902 621-400-007-2 Margaret I. Schlimgen c/o M.S. Krall 42-550 Audrey Cir. Palm Desert, CA 92260 621-391-045-9 Portola Golf Ranchos Ltd. c/o Jack H. Bennett 130 E. 17th St. Ste.K Costa Mesa, CA 92627 621-954-013-7 Robert Marantz 11965 Gorham Los Angeles, CA 90049 621-594-014-8 &015-9 Charles S. Gibbs 70673 Oroville Cir. Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 621-240-003-4 Glenn Merlian 2710 W. 177th St. Torrance, CA 90504 621-581-003_8 Dane S. Winters CA 90272 7036 Cabot Way Stanton, CA 90680 Richard D. Calvert 13261 Donegal Dr. Garden Grove, CA 92641 621-391-021-7 Sun King Homeowners Assoc. j c/o Marie Lawriesmith 42-510 Granite Pl. Palm Desert, CA 92260 621-400-016-0 Howard P. Marguleas c/o AG Accounting 5544 California St. Ste.28 Bakersfield, CA 93309 621-400-002-7 Palm Desert 210 Ltd. Casa Laguna P.O.Box 1905 Newport Beach, CA 92660 621-581-004-9 & 582-003-1 Cecil S. Winters 39556 Peterson Rd. Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 621-582-002-0 James C. Farber 12 Narcisse Dr. Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 621-581-002-7 90274 Robert L. McCoy 42-552 Granite P1. Palm Desert, CA 92260 621-582-001-9 Delmar M. Persinger 17582 Leafwood Lane. Tustin, CA 92680