Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOUNTRY CLUB DRIVE/MONTEREY AVENUE C/Z 09-79 1979MAYER GROUP/PALM DESERT CA. Ballew/ McFarland; Architecture,& Landscape Architecture C. .ter � fr�l irwrl�� M,rz do ato-1 iTITi7-1 1'C_Y. IV. LANDSCAPING Three of the centrally located recreation areas with swimming pool and jacuzzi are surrounded by water and palm trees. Palms are repeated at each of the nine recreation areas. Large shade trees line the two major streets. Conifers are used throughout the site as background planting to provide privacy and screening. Several varieties of eucalyptus are used for vertical massing in the motor courts, courtyards, and throughout the site, providing a unifying element. Large masses of palo verde and eucalyptus are used on the north and west edge of the site to provide blow sand protection. Specimen trees are strategically located throughout the greenbelt areas at critical walk intersections. V. GRADING The site slopes gently from a high point at the northwest corner to the park area at the southwest. The park finish grade is sunken 3 ft. below the level of Monterey and Country Club Drive, and acts as a retention area for runoff. A berm, 6 ft. high on the park side, and 3 ft. high on the residential side, separates the park area from the dwelling units. / TO /FRANK SINATRA � 1 � DESERT ISLAND // PALM DESERT GREENS \� 1 EISMHOWER CE �`L 'MAYER SI THE SPRINGS y ! 1 I f iCOUNTRY CLUB DR. ! SUNRISE c m � W 1 TO� / PALM SPRI LOCATION MAP RANCHO LAS PALMAS I I NEW CITY CENTER / / COLLEGE' SITE \4�� OF THE DESERT wwm cr Ewommmmpmwgp 611 —.084— Follow IF ?a in Klv,- �V, Ma" M M p 60 t c'. u % IKJV4 WLAS� LINEM MAW, p7gg ;7folq Mn-iN I WK, ,10 -3 1 � _b Im V, IRV 11 11 8, rM Mig e. M% 2. L tz J,,E� P73La Pu r upiNA cv- ALL": WA, 5 M v Wit, Cv, TAW MI M4 v -.- —Murie mll �WIXI. 'A L Alp. . . . . . . . . . . JIM 3% VZ Idol "Wo ic vv�', Ir Ow, 4 IV4 , N )JZ FA 9 IKE ...... ...... --3 MIN oi LA 't� _P19W. 21176 3hi W l Mill 1. MAYER GROUP M Acres -Palm Desert -CA danew/mwarianc 31annines A Are-1%ifg:Ae4iir= 1 MAYER GROUP 40 Acres - Palm Desert,CA, TABULATION GROSS ACRES ,39.1 DWELLING UNITS 264 GROSS DENSITY 6.75du/ac PARKING .covered 528 .court 42 •Street 99 TOTAL: 00 ratb-2.53 PUBLIC PARK 9net acme LAND USE Moc 18% .=ow"rage 0aret'a8e 074c 4% COW drhoS 2.87e0 7% _BhootS 712ac 5% ,Street perking .408C 1% •street dedicBRbn 1.568c 4% •open spree 22.41ac 57% -court parking 100ac 3% VIEMM&L4 &7M FUH Ballew/McFarland Inc. Planning & Architecture 1780 Sky Park Blvd. !wine, CA. 92714 MAYER GROUP 40 Acres -Palm Desert,CA. EGEND �•--� DIRECTION OF FLOW PROPOSED CONTOUR H HIGH POINT LOW POINT 'INABOM pd 8, H Ballew/McFarland Planning & Architecture 17848 Sky Paris Blvd. Irvine, CA. 92714 60 Inca MOM�--naRAMEM& ",Mlpmmsk . ........ LIMW 0 IANr.ari" 1= A .....unua...... 0111,11, .... ". . ....... T r T.: I Lral R k courtyard elm side elev. N��,��1�� l MINIM!'11 N\A \\A\\\\\\\\\\\��\C\..' Md I' 'diii' III �W a.a3 Rgilij;iIiijill 1,11111 1 j11111111 -1±I1t1I,I l-,'r,I,-.I._ . � . *_ 1 1 • • court Maw - 1!j�'1,1" 1 11121 1! .M!it.11i 2I �� I7I ®Milo.. [lllla:�,.^!I:, X,:^rC . , .F.i�#h..�l 2 0 m = 1 1 a� Cqd �►tl.y�,7 17 PW i; laL' _ %' 1 �r. i�if • : r �/LI. UA I/iy% `';%ii��Ifr� r1 { ri •�����I� ✓ 1' • l�� i s, / /a:ri-i� ' /j, 40 ��'� ��1�.%ice:-�� . � i • j � . }" '��f �+ i -�� � '�� t► a or Wq Pal IA�� i��� POP f �� 1 r.� Courtyard of luLl tL �Z 1 W Q } W a W > F z 0 1 9 SECAf1�A#Z7� YIoFG �T��E� L-,4N�S�APIN6 a COUNTRY CLUB DR, mr-=t- S7ANDINB 51c,N MAIN r-N71?`f 4 _ / ONE WA'f SERVICE 4CC>=55 3 /� Iti —,. 24 -r 24 24 71 z4 - - -- 1 6 WALL A•LON6 PKWEIE IY LINE 7CEt Cr SLUPL— 2.1 VLMTED SLOPE- �t=115E- 1317��E� LAtiTPScfAPINC-� I �✓GA�.-. ICIER" '► ��� io Ot�FICE f31-t». KE5TAUKANT t21,GOO SF- (25TORY) st�E R�s1D�•tT►�N- 7' DEC.Oiz.AMVE WArW, ENXY t'ET}11L _ — WALL 516N s i op CITY OF i PALM DESERT tL DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL• SERVICES S EXHIBIT S , _ C,'FICUlS CO) 00.00* �>zOQos�v �c11�ir�c �� 95000 � r R500IKEb -PflKKINO 47�5" FACES 12AKKIN8 54OWN 478 �Cf-s SCALE: 1 y=4p 1 io !O I �� � F 3j .tf*" TM(.yI ,4 t •� C x* y..-Wi!1 1SW5� - ��t , r`2oM S�DNlsloly i C (C ID)h`� p o O a A ammmy I o �VIS D i c)U ft :�s M5�3 � a � W r a 11 HIM rN:,• to�+r.i m A f � r denen V er� F-1 bath s' le Mge garage storage rag dcoJS le Page r-71 4 "211 1 "4/ entry fivin 7 71 kitch -'�MAYER GROUP 40 Acres - Palm Desert,CA. 3 uving 0 REP 7 ---entry Mst dijR 2 kitch Ballew/McFarland Inc. Planning & Architecture 17848 Sky Park Blvd. Irvine, CA. 92714 now, F !LIP= W MUM= SAA MAYER (i P Ballew/McFarland Planning & Architecture dLO Arrac - Pnim nocart r-A mv cD cD m Cr cD 0 S 0 MAYER GROUP 40 Ar-rp--q - Palm Ilaccart ('-A Ballew/McFarland Inc. Planning & Architecture Fvrfk-�Am vw 7 G)T( OF t�iJ:HIO M1f�L�l=- 60 N- f • •�COUNFRI`—•-Et 55 �� � �� GIT`f OF x._aYG ERVVI7 f RV1�. I_OCATIONAL MAP: it. DISCUSSION: Staff has received a verbal request from Dan Salceda of Mayer Group, asking for a continuance of this request. This request is based on the action of the City Council at its meeting of April 23, 1981, where a policy of considering time extensions, one month prior to expiration, was adopted. The Development Plan and Design Review Board Case will expire on July 23. 1981. EDWARD B. CAPLAN t 1712 GRAND RARAMA DRIVE, NEST PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92262 Dec. 11,1979 Palm Desert Planning Commission Palm Desert City }fall 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Cal. 92260 Dear Commissioners: I am the Owner of land on Vista Dunes Road -specifically parcel 620-060-012--which is parallel to and close by the proposed Monterey Road extension.. I wish to he placed on record as being very much in favor of granting the zoning and annexation,requested by the Developer,for the improvement of the Corner Parcel at Monterey and Country Club Drive. On the North side across from the Shopping Center... Thank you for your kind consideration. Very truly ours, Edward B. Caplan MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 1980 Page Four VII. OLD BUSINESS - NONE VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Case No. GPA 01-80, Revised Public Hearing date. B. Case No. ZOA 05-80, Revised Public Hearing date. C. Case No. C/Z 10-80, Revised Public Hearing date. Mr. Crump stated that because the environmental consultant for the General Plan Update was experiencing some delay in their progress and the established hearing schedule will not be met. He gave Staff's recommendation of the new scheduled dates. Commissioner Richards asked if November 4th was Election Day. Mr. Ortega confirmed that it was. Minute Motion was made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, to change the Commission meeting date from November 4th to November 5, 1980, 7:00 p.m. Carried unanimously (5-0). Motion was made by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 640, 641 and 642, setting the Public Hearing dates as follows: GPA 01-80 December 2, 1980 7:00 p.m. ZOA 05-80 November 5, 1980 7:00 p.m. C/Z 10-80 November 5, 1980 7:00 p.m. D. Case --Nos. DP 15-79, C/Z 09-79, TT 16015, 200 MF - MAYER GROUP and BALLEW-MCFARLAND, Applicants Request for approval of preliminary plans for 9 acre public park at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. Mr. Sawa presented this case noting that a condition of approval required that the applicant provide a plan for the park development. He then gave a general background description of the park site and stated that the reviewing bodies made some comments (City Park and Recreation Commission, Design Review Board, Coachella Valley Parks and Recreation District). He reviewed those comments and stated that the Commission should determine what facilities should be provided in the park. Mr. Sawa also suggested that after they determine what facilities should be provided that the Commission review a revised site plan prior to the final plans being prepared. Commissioner Kryder asked who would be responsible for the maintenance of the park. Mr. Sawa replied that he anticipated some agreement between the City and Coachella Valley Park and Recreation District in maintaining the park. Commissioner Kryder was also concerned for the unsupervised tennis courts in terms of vandalism, etc. Commissioner Richards asked Staff if there was a study made indicating expected park utilization. Mr. Crump replied that the condominium development would be utilizing the park and that the City Parks and Recreation Commission and C.V. Parks and Recrea- tion District, in their review, defined what facilities they felt were necessary. Commissioner McLachlan asked if the condominium development would have any tennis courts. Mr. Crump replied that it would not. Lir Nubb rur rrt.y ui Isynl-ury emu renr.nry Lilt Ittrunn wu, to WI 611 I'll. uv6y ui 611t C.V. Parks and Recreation District but Mr. Doty opposed the idea. He indicated that they do anticipate to include lights in the final design but they would not be installing them. The Commission also felt there was inadequate parking provided. Mr. Arbuckle stated that most of the concerns expressed could be worked out and did not want to delay the project further. Commissioner Berkey asked the applicant if the Commission were to decide that it was premature to decide on anything now, would he be willing to bond the completion of the project at a future date. MR. DAVE GUTIERREZ, Project Manager for Mayer Group, 8280 E. Florence, Downey, stated that he would like to look into the bonding amounts. Mr. Crump explained that one of the conditions from the Development Plan states that the park improvements can occur during the last half of development, therefore, the applicants can proceed with development even if no decisions were made tonight. Commissioner Richards suggested that a further study be made and a report be submitted to the Commission. The Commission concurred. Motion was made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, to continue this item indefinitely for further study. Carried unanimously (5-0). E. Case Nos. DP 03-80 and VAR 03-80, STEIN-BRIEF/VISTA, Applicant Approval of a phasing scheme for an approved Development Plan located at the Southwest corner of Highway 111 and 44th Avenue. Mr. Crump presented this case illustrating the proposed phasing scheme and uses on the Exhibit. He indicated that Staff recommends the improvements to the Palm Valley Channel occur within the first phase of site development which drains to the channel. Commissioner Richards asked if the Hotel would be developed at the same time the Restaurant would be. Mr. Crump replied that it would. Commissioner Berkey explained that because it was a previous condition to get the CVWD's approval of the improvements, he suggested that Condition No. 3 be amended to read: "Improvements to the Palm Valley Channel shall occur, subject to the Coachella Valley Water District, in the first phase of development to the channel, etc...." He also pointed out that the channel should be improved before any development occurs. Mr. Morgan, Engineering Aide, stated that the Department of Public Works had requested the drainage plan on this site but had not yet received it. He also suggested that Condition No. 3 be amended from "as required by the Director of Environmental Services" to "as required by the Director of Public Works". Mr. Crump clarified the modification to Condition No. 3 as follows: "Improvements to the Palm Valley Channel, as required in the original Development Plan approval, shall occur in the first phase of development." Gflfb� off 1Y:1sn1L=x 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE September 19,1980 APPLICANT MAYER GROUP & BALLEW-MCFARLAND 8121 E. Florence Ave. Downey, CA 90240 CASE NO: DP 15-7 C/Z 09-79 (UA), TT 16015, 200 MF The Planning Comnission.of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of September 17, 1980 X CONTINUED It Indefinite DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. MURREL CRUMP, Acting Secretary PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY - SEPTEMBER 9, 1980 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. The meeting was called to order at 2:38 p.m. after a 12 hour study session. MEMBERS PRESENT: Rick Holden Bernie Leung Charles Martin Eric Johnson Phyllis Jackson MEMBERS ABSENT: Vern Barton Al Cook STAFF PRESENT: Stan Sawa Phil Drell On a motion by Barton, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the minutes of August 28, 1980, subject to revisions to Case Nos. 164 MF and 200 MF (Park Design). Carried 3-0-2 (Leung, Martin, Johnson, with Holden and Jackson Abstaining) II. Minutes Motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session: Case No. 151 MF (Time Extension) - TOM TROLLOPE - Six month extension on approval of final plans for six unit residential project at northwest corner of Tumbleweed Lane and Sage Lane. On a motion by Martin, seconded by Holden, the Board moved to grant the requested six month time extension. Carried 5-0 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson, & Jackson) III. CASES Case No. 129 C - GERALD J. CHAZAN and ROBERT RICCIARDI - Final approval for plans for commercial building in new Safeway shopping center on the westerly side of Palms to Pines Shopping Center between E1 Paseo and Highway 111; Tony Araiza was present. The Board reviewed the final working drawings submitted by the applicant. It was noted that the pedestrian signs were not permitted in this situation and sign above the roof line is also not permitted. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Leung, the Board moved to grant approval of final working drawings subject to the pedestrian sign and sign above the roof being deleted. Carried 4-0-1 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Jackson, with Johnson Abstaining). Case No. 497 SA - CROCKER BANK c/o COMMERCIAL SIGN AND LIGHTING, INC. - Approval of business identification signs for Crocker Bank at 73-833 Highway 111; Sharon Washbrook was present. The Board reviewed the submitted exhibits and indicated that they felt the Y MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 9, 1980 ********************* Page Two Case No 111 C - WELLS FARGO BANK c/o COMMERCIAL SIGN AND LIGHTING, INC. - Approval of Logo on new Bank building at the southwest corner of Lantana Ave. and E1 Paseo; Sharon Washbrook was present. The applicant presented the actual logo which would be mounted in the stucco wall on the west side of the structure, adjacent to the entry. It was noted the logo size would be 1 sq.ft. with colors to be aluminum and black. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Martin, the Board moved to grant approval of this request. Carried 5-0 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson and Jackson). Case No. 216 MF -SOUTHWESTERN ENTERPRISES, INC. and RONALD GREGORY - Approval of perimeter wall and landscaping plan along Mesa View Drive for single family subdivision on the east of Highway 74, south of Homestead Road; Ed Wright and Ronald Gregory were present. The applicants made a presentation explaining the landscaping concept. They stated that a letter should be or will soon be submitted to Staff indicating a desire to form a Homeowners Association to maintain the landscaping around the perimeter. They also presented an adendum to the landscaping plan which showed landscaping on the south side of Mesa View Drive, east of Prairie Drive. The Board indicated their concern regarding erosion of slope areas and in -filling behind the garden walls. The applicant indicated that they would provide slope planting and irrigation for any slope areas within the individual lots. They felt that this was a condition of the tract, but also indicated that they would provide it even if it was not a condition. It was noted that the wall design would have to be reviewed by the Flood Committee of the City. Staff noted that if any significant changes are required to the perimeter treatment that it would be returned to the Board for approval. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Martin, the Board moved to grant approval of this request, subject to the following revisions: 1. Planting at left -turn pockets to be reduced in height. 2. Slope protection of private lots shall be provided through planting and permanent irrigation (to be approved by the Design Review Board). 3. Prior to any work on the perimeter treatment commencing, Flood Committee approval shall be obtained. Carried 5-0 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson, and Jackson). Case No. 178 MF - TRANSCOPIC DEVELOPMENT CORP. - Revised preliminary approval 0 60 unit residential project at the northeast corner of Portola Avenue and Magnesia Drive; Bill Lo was present. The Board reviewed the exhibits submitted by the applicant. The Board felt the Suhmittal wac inrmmnlata in fk, f i+ a;a ..---�_4_ .__X -9_-- - MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 9, 1980 Page Three ****************************************** along with the alignment problem along Magnesia Falls Drive. The Board felt that the changes proposed by the applicant were acceptable. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Johnson, the Board moved to grant revised preliminary approval of this request. Carried 5-0 (Holden, Leung, Martin, Johnson, and Jackson). IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS Unity Church Worldwide - Exterior remodeling of building at 73-669 Highway 111; Rick Holden was present. The Applicant presented plans for an exterior remodel- ing and a small mechanical room addition for discussion. The Board presented the applicant with some guidance. V. ADJOURNMENT - 4:36 P.M. STAN SAWA, Associate Planner /lr ORDINANCE NO. 219 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 107, THE PALM DESERT ZONING MAP BY CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-1, 12,000 (RIVERSIDE COUNTY ZONE) TO PR-7 (U.A.) AND APPROVING A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 264 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A NINE ACRE PARK, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY DRIVE. CASE NOS. C/Z 09-79 AND DP 15-79 (U.A.) The City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN, as follows: SECTION 1: That a portion of Ordinance No. 107 referencing Section 25.46-1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Map (Chapter 25.46 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code) is hereby amended to read as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 2: The City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, California, is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance in the Palm Desert Post, a news- paper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Palm Desert, California, and shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3: That a Development Plan for 264 condominium units and a nine acre park on 39.1 gross acres is hereby granted to MAYER GROUP, INC., subject to compliance with conditions attached hereto, labeled Exhibit "B". PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the Palm Desert City Council this 24th day of January , 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Brush, McPherson, Newbrander, Wilson & Mullins NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: COUNTY I CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE D. P7 13 ////// R - I 12,000 %///////,I TO P.R.-7, IVERSIDE -C@t3'NfiRY'-CCCJB-DRIVE -- - CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. 219 EXHIBIT "B" Page -1- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 15-79 Standard Conditions: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with Exhibit A (Case No. DP 15-79) on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant --shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include, but are not limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process, and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all Municipal Code require- ments to the degree that the City could consider each phase as a single project. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to the issuance of any City permits for the commencement of construction on said project, the applicant shall agree in writing to these Conditions of Approval. 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in additions to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 7. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 8. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the development of this project per attached letter dated November 27, 1979 (as listed in items i through 7). 9. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 10. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 11. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 219 EXHIBIT "B" SPECIAL CONDITIONS Page -2- That the 9 acre (net) park site shown on Exhibit "B" shall be dedicated to the City of Palm Desert as a part of any final subdivision map; and, shall be developed in accordance with a plan approved by the Planning Commission prior to final occu- pancy permit being granted for the last 50% of the dwelling units contemplated in this approval. A detailed plan of park development shall be submitted to the Design Review Board, City Park and Recreation Commission, and Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District for recommenda- tion to the Planning Commission, prior to approval of final construction drawings for the dwelling units. The level of developer participation in the improvements to the park site shall be defined to include: - Complete right-of-way improvements (including curb, gutter, and meandering sidewalk) - Complete site grading - Blowsand protection planting - Ornamental landscaping and irrigation parkway - Construction of six nonlighted tennis system for the perimeter courts - Provision of professional design services for the balance of the park improvements, including working drawings Plans submitted for the Design Review process shall reconcile entrance location and median island design with property entrances on the south side of Country Club Drive. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by tho nonartmant of Fnvirnnmantal Sarviroc ?14-. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 219 EXHIBIT "B" DEPART1MENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE CU 4.V T:' CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FOREST-RY _ DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN November 27, 1979 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Case No: DP 15-79 Dear Mr. Williams, Page -3- P.O. 8OX 248 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA S23-70 TELEPHONE (7141 657-3183 We request denial of this project for the following reasons: 1. This development is beyond the 5 minute response limit for existing stations. 2. A development of this size will have substantial impact on our already overtaxed fire protection system. Should this development be approved, the following requirements shall apply. f David J. Ortegel Fire Marshal DJO:dt Attachment I CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 219 EXHIBIT "B" Page -4- Re: Case No: DP 15-79 Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 15-79 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Interior street shall be a minimum of 28' excepting streets less than 150' in length may have a width of 24'. 7. Any cul-de-sac street greater than 150' in length shall have a turn -around. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 19, 1979 Page -2- VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) B. Continued Case No S C/Z 09-79 U.A.) and DP 15-79 - MAYER GROUP, INC., Appli Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1, 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7 (U.A.) (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac.) (Upon Annexation) or other zone as deemed appropriate, and approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. Mr. Crump presented this case stating that the request was continued for more data and the major concerns were on the density and park facilities. He then reviewed the park purposes and improvements noting the fees collected for park and recreation purposes must be allocated within 5 years or returned to the property owners. He indicated that the density proposed was 6.75 d.u./ac., which was within the General Plan range of 5-7 d.u./ac. He explained the justifications for the density/design and reviewed the alternatives the Commission had for approval. He noted the various letters received giving their approval or objections to this case. He concluded by recommending approval of the case. Commissioner Berkey noted that at the last meeting it was stated that the Fire Marshal recommended denial of this project. Mr. Williams stated that Fire Station #3 would be built in 1982-83 and felt that it would be in line to serve this project. Commissioner Miller asked if the developer was aware of the land provisions specified in the letter received by Coachella Valley County Water District? Mr. Williams responded stating that part of the subdivision process was that they meet with the developer to discuss this. Chairman Snyder asked if the applicant cared to make a presentation. MIKE MOHLER, Vice -President of Mayer Co., 8121 Florence, Downey, reviewed the letter he sent to the Commission and identified the three primary needs of the City. He then explained how these needs would be satisfied. JOHN BALLEW, Ballew-McFarland, El Paseo, stated that he had attempted to take comments from the previous meeting and illustrations to address the Commission's concerns. He explained that the County has deviated in its appli- cation of zoning densities. He also addressed the subject of open space between the units. He concluded by requesting a modification to condition #13 giving them the opportunity to grade before a Final Tract Map is recorded. Chairman Snyder asked Mr. Williams how the Director of Public Works would feel about this modification. Mr. Williams stated that he believed Mr. Beebe would concur with this request. Chairman Snyder opened the Public Hearing asking if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the Public Hearing was closed. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 19, 1979 Page -3- VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) Commissioner Kryder asked what the density would be on the adjacent proposed Mobile Home Park. Mr. Williams stated that the zoning allows 102 spaces per 15 acres. There was discussion on the alternative of reducing the park and spreading the units. It was explained by Mr. Ballew how the density was acquired and that the project is in conformance with the General Plan. Mr. Fleshman explained how the actual density was less than what the General Plan called for. Commissioner Kryder made a motion, seconded by Chairman Snyder, to approve Case Nos. C/Z 09-79 (U.A.) and DP 15-79, as modified. The vote was as follows: AYES: Commissioner Kryder, Chairman Snyder NOES: Commissioner Berkey, Commissioner Miller ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Being a 2-2 vote, the motion failed, therefore; the Deputy City Attorney, Jeff Patterson, was contacted by phone and he suggested that it be referred to the City Council with no recommendation. It was agreed by the Commission. C. Case No. PM 14163 - I. HAROLD HOUSLEY, Applicant Request for approval of a one year time extension for a previously approved Tentative Parcel Map to divide one parcel into three parcels, located at the southwest corner of San Jose and Catalina Way. Mr. Crump presented this case illustrating the locations of the three proposed parcels, and concluded with a staff recommendation for approval. Chairman Snyder opened the Public Hearing asking if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. There being none, the Public Hearing was closed. Upon motion made by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Miller, Case No. PM 14163 was approved by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 558. Carried unanimously (4-0). D. Case No. CUP 03-79 (Amendment) - JACK WISE, Applicant Request to allow amendment to an approved Conditional Use Permit condition which requires undergrounding of existing utilities to the site from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed, to allow construction of a racquetball and health club on approximately 1.4 acres ..{+64- +M- ❑ o /n\ /ne..i a c...,.i.. n,...a,. & -1 n nnn -- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 4, 1979 Page -6- Upon motion made by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, Case Nos. DP 14-79 and 189 MF were approved by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 557, subject to conditions. Carried unanimously (4-0). THERE WAS A 10 MINUTE BREAK -- THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:55 P.M. H. Case Nos. C/Z 09-79 nd GROUP, INC., icant. DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation), MAYER Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1, 12,000 (River- side County Zone) to PR-7 (U.A.) (Planned Residential District, Max. 7 d.u./ac.) (Upon Annexation) or other zone as deemed appro- priate, and approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and nine acre public park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive. Mr. Williams presented this case with a short review of the staff report. He used the map illustrations to point out the design and features which included a public park, bicycle/pedestrian system, pool areas, and a variety of sizes of units. The Design Review Board had made suggestions to the design of the park. He also pointed out that the density was high but the project was a unigue one. The County of Riverside submitted a concern and also felt the density was too great. Mr. Williams added that the County thought the density should be restricted to 4.5 dwelling units per acre. Another issue was the park development, it was suggested the park be improved. He concluded stating that this project was unique and recommended approval. Commissioner Berkey was very concerned on the density matter. He stated that he needed very strong justification to approve this. Mr. Williams explained that he felt they had provided an amenity for the area, the design was unique, and also felt it was compatible to the areas surrounded. Commissioner Berkey stated that if this were for rental housing he would be favorable for it but for condominiums he was not. Commissioner Miller pointed out that the project was not within the five mile limit for the fire department. Mr. Williams pointed out the fire station was programed for two years on a site to the east. Chairman Snyder asked if the applicant cared to make a presentation. STEVE FLESHMAN, 74-075 E1 Paseo, stated he was aware of that they were not within the five mile limit but pointed out that the situation would change in the future when the new Fire Station is constructed. He added that this parcel would be the only one that is not a Mobile Home Park in the area. He further stated that the City needed the park site. He concluded that these units would be at an affordable price and introduced Mr. Ballew. 1 JOHN BALLEW, Ballew-McFarland, added to Mr. Fleshman's comments stating MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 4, 1979 Page -7- MIKE MOLLER, Representative of Mayer Group, 8284 Florence Ave, Downey, gave different reasons as to why he thought the project was sensible. MIKE BUCCINO, Landscape Architect, 278 C North Palm Canyon, gave his views on the zoning, objecting to the high density. He pointed r out that there were too many condominiums for this kind of project. He also felt that the first city park should be located in the center of I( the City. EDWARD KAPLAN, Realtor, 247 E. Taquitz, stated he was an owner of 33 acres on Vista Dunes. He was very much in favor of the project because he felt the park would be a plus to the families in the area. JULES RGSEN, 190 E. 72nd Street, New York City, opposed the project stating there were too many condominiums in this community. He added that the park would attract too many people and would be taking away the family look in that area. Chairman Snyder closed the Public Hearing. He then asked if the applicant cared to add any comments. Mr. Fleshman added that the intent was to try_.something with a different spacing that would be appealing. He stated that that was why everything looked the same. He felt the park would not be detrimental and explained why. Commissioner Kryder made a motion to approve this case by adopting Resolution No. 558. The motion was dropped due to lack of a second. After further discussion on the density it was suggested to continue this case for more data. Mr. Ballew agreed on the continuance. Chairman Snyder opened the Public Hearing and asked for a motion. Commissioner Kryder made a motion to continue, it was seconded by Commissioner Berkey, Case Nos. C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 were continued to December 19, 1979. Carried unanimously (4-0). VII. OLD BUSINESS - NONE VIII. NEW BUSINESS Date for first meeting in January, 1980. Mr. Williams suggested to move the meeting of January 1, 1980, to January 3, 1980. The motion was made and carried unanimously (4-0). IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS - NONE X. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - NONE XI. COMMENTS Chairman Snyder suggested that they have a study session for more -r ri7 nn 7n --A nn it 7n MM MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING VI. CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) F. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE By KARLA & RICK SEIDNER For The El Paseo San wich Shop, 73-990 E1 Paseo, Palm Desert, California. Rec:. Receive and file. Councilman McPherson moved and Councilman Newbrander seconded to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried unanimously. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CASE NO. C/Z 09-79 AND DP 15-79 - MAYER GROUP, INC., APPLICANT: FROM R-1, 12,000 (RIVERSIDE COUNTY ZONE) TO PR-7 (U.A.) (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, MAX. 7 D.U./AC.) (UPON ANNEXA- TION) OR OTHER ZONE AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE, AND APPROVAL OF A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 264 ,CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A NINE ACRE PUBLIC PARK ON 39.1 GROSS ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY DRIVE. Mayor Mullins declared the Public Hearing open and asked for Staff's report. Mr. Williams reported that the Planning Commission had first reviewed the project at their December 9th meeting. However, the item was continued to the meeting of December 19th to allow the applicant to address the Commission's concerns relative to the public park, density, and parking. He stated that purpose of the park was to provide recreational opportunities and uses for the surrounding neighborhoods as well as the subject development. In addition, the park would present an asethetically enhanced appearance at a major access point to the City; would provide a drainage retention area for the land under development; and would separate residential units from a major street intersection. He reviewed the proposed park improvements and maintenance. With regard to the concerns relative to density, Mr. Williams pointed out that the resulting area density would be 4.65 d.u/ acre which is consistent with the General Plan density of 5-7 units to the acre.and is further justified due to the park dedication. He stated that Staff also felt that this would provide different housing in the area in that the majority of the area is being developed as mobile home parks. He reviewed the concerns relative to parking and stated that the applicant has proposed to provide an additional 24 parking spaces within the project. With respect to the concerns of fire protection, Mr. Williams pointed out that Fire Station #3 was proposed for 1982-83 which would be sufficient time for protection of this project. With respect to concerns for DroDerty to be used by the 1 MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING * * * *********;: :; ** *** ;:* ** *,.******.. *t * * * VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) A. CASE NO. C/Z 09-79 AND DP 15-79 (Continued) Mayor Mullins invited input relative to the project. MR. MIKE MOLLER, Vice President of Mayer Development, 8280 Florence Street, Downey, California, addressed Council stating they were pleased with the development plan as presented and that it represented a great cooperative effort between themselves and Staff. He referred to his letter of December 13, 1979, wherein they had offered to contribute double their requirement for the signalization of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. He reviewed the issue of providing affordable housing in an area where it is badly needed. He also pointed out that they were contributing 9 acres for the public park rather than the 2 acres required. MR. JOHN BALLEW, Ballew McFarland, Palm Desert, addressed Council as the architect of the project. He reviewed the project's attributes in depth and requested Council approval. Councilman Newbrander stated her 3 concerns: (1) additional parking for the public park; traffic on Country Club and Monterey; and seeing the signal put in before the project is developed. Mr. Ballew responded that there would be ample parking for the park, but with regard to the signal, it would be up to the City to expedite the installation of it. Mayor Mullins invited input in OPPOSITION to the project, and none was offered. He declared the Public Hearing closed. Mayor Mullins stated that he was pleased to see a park which will be built in the immediate future as well as affordable housing. Councilman Brush stated that the City has actually acquired many park sites, but this one will actually be a park being built. He also stated his pleasure that this was a concept that was encouraged by the Staff in that Council has encouraged developers to work with Staff cooperatively. They have met every requirement asked of them and gone beyond. Councilman Brush moved and further reading and pass Ordinance carried unanimously. IX. ORDINANCES For Introduction: None Councilman McPherson seconded to waive No. 219 to second reading. Motion For Adoption: 1 None Mayer Construction Inc. 8121 East Florence Avenue Downey, California 90240 (213) 927-3341 f1P.rC r f V e D JAN - 4 19?:O ENVIR(jN,V1�,4 IHL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT January 2, 1980 City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Secretary Re: Case Number C/A 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) Gentlemen: According to the action taken December 19, 1979 by the Planning Commission, the City Council will be considering the Mayer Group's request regarding case number C/A 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) on January 10, 1980. On behalf of the Mayer Group, I would like to reiterate the concepts and resulting proposals submitted to the Commission prior to the December 19th meeting as well as respond to an additional question surfaced at that meeting. Working with the City staff and various agencies over a several -month period, we have identified three primary needs which we as developers of the proposed project can feasibly satisfy in whole or in part. These needs are: the creation of City Park called for in the General Plan; development of "affordable" housing; and implementation of a traffic signal at the Country Club Drive and Monterery Intersection. The proposed Mayer Group project would address these needs as follows: City Park According to the City's current formula, development of the proposed project would require dedication of approximately two (2) acres to the City as park lands. We propose to exceed this requirement by 450 percent to nine (9) acres. Appraisers estimate that the fair market price of the additional seven acres would be approximately $300,000. The Mayer Group further proposes to grade the site and construct the appropriate street improvements, estimated to cost more than $150,000. And, as the proposed site plan reflects, six (6) public tennis courts would be located within the City Park with an estimated construction cost of $125,000. CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT UPDATE To: Planning Commission Report on: Preannexation Zoning and Related Development Plan Applicant: Mayer Group, Inc., 8121 E. Florence Avenue, Downey, CA 90240 Case No(s): C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) Date: December 19, 1979, continued from December 4, 1979 I II REQUEST: Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1, 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7 (U.A.) (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac.) (Upon Annexation) or other zone as deemed appropriate, and approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre public park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive. LOCATIONAL MAP: BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING: North: Riverside County, R-T (Mobile Home Zoning) South: P.C.(2) East: Riverside County, R-T (Mobile Home Zoning) West: Rancho Mirage B. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: STAFF REPORT - UPDATE DECEMBER 19, 1979 Page -2- II. BACKGROUND: (Continued) E. CONCEPTUAL PLAN FEATURES: 1. Access - internal private street system with one entrance to Monterey Drive and one to Country Club Drive. 2. Density - 264 dwelling units on 39.1 gross acres = 6.75 d.u./ac. 3. Dwelling Description - modules of six units from one bedroom, two bath to two bedroom, two bath and den; one to two stories. 4. Open Space/Recreational Amenities - - 9 acre park site - 8 swimming/recreation areas within the residential portion of the project - Calculated open space, 59.69% of the net site 5. Parking Provided - covered, 568 spaces - bay, 42 spaces (Revised Plan provides 24 additional bay spaces) - street, 99 spaces F. OVERALL RESIDENTIAL DENSITY WITHIN THE SQUARE MILE SECTION: - Acres of Residential Use: 520 - Projected Number of Dwelling Units, (including the subject project); 2,422 - Density for the Section: 4.65 d.u./ac. III. DISCUSSION: The subject request was continued from the December 9th meeting for addi- tional data, illustrations, and Commission discussion. The primary topics of discussion focused on the park facility and density/design considerations. A. PARK FACILITY CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Park Purpose: a. To provide recreational opportunities and uses for the surrounding neighborhoods (and the subject development) b. To present an aesthetically enhanced appearance at a major access point to the City. c. To provide a drainage retention area for the land under development d. To provide a distance separation between residential units and a major street intersection; thereby mitigating traffic noise impacts. 2. Park Improvements: A Annlirnnf Prnvidod- STAFF REPORT - UPDATE DECEMBER 19, 1979 Page -3- III. DISCUSSION: (Continued) 2. Park Improvements: (Continued) c. Fundina For The Citv Portion Of Park Improvements: In -lieu fees already paid by Sagewood McBail Co.) and Monterey Country Club. In -lieu fees to be collected from presently planned and future residential developments in this area. NOTE: The City must allocate the use of fees collected for park and recreation purposes within five (5) years, or return them to the property owners. 3. Park Maintenance: a. The Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District preliminarily indicates that maintenance of the facility - is possible by their Districts, and would be considered further with the stipulation that the District is involved in the final design considerations. (Draft conditions of approval have been revised to reflect this design review participation); and/or, b. City Maintenance - General Fund, budget item. B. DENSITY/DESIGN CONSIDERATION: 1. Project/Area Densities: a. General Plan Density Range - 5-7 d.u./ac. b. Proposed Project- 6.75 d.u./ac. c. Resulting Area Density - 4.65 d.u./ac. 2. Project Design Justification: a. Imaginative design approach b. Project provides public park fully dedicated.and.partielly improved (at a cost savings to the City) c. Site warrants special consideration based on adjacent uses (i.e., commercial to the south), location at major entrance intersection, and General Plan park designation d. Project provides an additional choice in housing type (and possibly in range of sales prices) 3. Additional Exhibits To Be Provided: a. Development around the subject site b. Cross section through Monterey Avenue and the site STAFF REPORT - UPDATE DECEMBER 19, 1979 Page -4- IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The primary criteria for Planning Commission recommendations on land use is the adopted City General Plan. The City Council exercises final approval authority over the number of dwelling units per acre permitted in the Planned Residential District (Municipal Code Section 25.24.050; Zoning Ordinance), and through action on a subdivision map determines the amount of park dedication or in -lieu fees to be paid (Municipal Code Section 26.48.060; Subdivision Ordinance). Council actions are likewise based on the General Plan. Staff observes that, in terms of land use criteria, the subject request fulfills all of the tenets of the General Plan, in that it provides for a designated public park, and is within the permitted density range, for both the specific site and section area. Furthermore, in consideration of the conceptual design merits, Staff recommends, based on the justifica- tion contained in the draft Resolution, to: Recommend approval to the City Council of a Change of Zone from R-1 12,000 to PR-7(U.A.) and related conceptual Development Plan containing 264 dwelling units and 9 acre public park, by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. , subject to conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESER, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 12,000 (RIVERSIDE COUNTY ZONE) TO PR-7 (U.A.) AND A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 264 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A NINE ACRE PARK, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY DRIVE. CASE NOS, DP 16-79 and C/Z 09-79 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of December, 1979, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and continued Public Hearing on December 19, 1979, to consider a request by MAYER GROUP, INC. for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7 (U.A.) (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac) (Upon Annexation) or other zone as deemed appropriate, and approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the northeast cor- ner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive, more particularly described as: APN 620-180-003 WHEREAS, said application has compled with the requirements of the City of Palm Desert "Environmental Quality Procedure, Resolution No. 78-32", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that this project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their recommendations and actions as described below: ' 1. Change of Zone: a. The land use resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with adjacent existing and proposed land uses. The density resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with densities permitted in the adjacent areas. The proposed Change of Zone would be compatible with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan. Development Plan: That proposed Development Plan is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. The proposed use is similar to and compatible with those contemplated on nearby properties. c. The design or improvement of the proposed development will be consistent with the Palm PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page -2- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7, S.P. (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 7 d.u./ac., Scenic Preservation Overlay) (Upon Annexation to the City of Palm Desert), as shown on the attached map labeled Exhibit "A". 3. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of the overall con- ceptual Development Plan (Exhibit "B") as part of their consideration of the related Change of Zone, subject to those conditions labeled Exhibit "C", attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 19th day of December, 1979, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: WALTER SNYDER, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /dj m COUNTY OF CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GI1Y OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "C" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 15-79 Page -1- Standard Conditions: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with Exhibit A (Case No. DP 15-79) on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include, but are not limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process, and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all Municipal Code require- ments to the degree that the City could consider each phase as a single project. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to the issuance of any City permits for the commencement of construction on said project, the applicant shall agree in writing to these Conditions of Approval. 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in additions to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force, ' or which hereafter may be in force. 7. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 8. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the development of this project per attached letter dated November 27, 1979 (as listed in items 1 through 7). 9. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 10. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 11. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "C" Page -2- SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. That the 9 acre (net) park site shown on Exhibit "B" shall be dedicated to the City of Palm Desert as a part of any final subdivision map; and, shall be developed in accordance with a plan approved by the Planning Commission prior to final occu- pancy permit being granted for the last 50% of the dwelling units contemplated in this approval. A detailed plan of park development shall be submitted to the Design Review Board, City Park and Recreation Commission, and Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District for recommenda- tion to the Planning Commission, prior to approval of final construction drawings for the dwelling units. The level of developer participation in the improvements to the park site shall be defined to include: - Complete right-of-way improvements (including curb, gutter, and meandering sidewalk) - Complete site grading - Blowsand protection planting - Ornamental landscaping and irrigation parkway - Construction of six nonlighted tennis system for the perimeter courts - Provision of professional design services for the balance of the park improvements, including working drawings Plans submitted for the Design Review process shall reconcile entrance location and median island design with property entrances on the south side of Country Club Drive. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. 1 1 M PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. — EXHIBIT "C" DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN November 27, 1979 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Case No: DP 15-79 Dear Mr. Williams, Page -3- P.O. BOX 248 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 We request denial of this project for the following reasons: 1. This development is beyond the 5 minute response limit for existing stations. 2. A development of this size will have substantial impact on our already overtaxed fire protection system. Should this development be approved, the following requirements shall apply. David J. Ortegel Fire Marshal DJO:dt Attachment PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ EXHIBIT "C" Re: Case No: DP 15-79 Page -4- Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 15-79 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Interior street shall be a minimum of 28' excepting streets less than 150' in length may have a width of 24'. 7. Any cul-de-sac street greater than 150' in length shall have a turn -around. COUNiY ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC CY �15TR1�� COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, PRESIDENT LOWELL O. WEEKS, GENERAL MANAGER - CHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS CODEKAS, VICE PMIDEIIT BERNARDINE SUTEON, SECRETARY C. J. FROST DENNIS M. HAC9M, AUDITOR WILLIAM, B. GARDNER REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEYS STEVE D. BUXTON Dept. of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, California Gentlemen; November 26, 1979 File N� 2a19'- Cv CITOF t„NA�"At $ERVI -q 92260 /. _ Re: Change of Zone 09-79 and D. P. 15-79 SW,'�, Sec. 5, T5S, R6E This area is protected from stormwater flows by the Whitewater River Stormwater Channel and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to said area in accordance with the currently prevailing regulations of this District. 0163.11 o421.1 0721.1 The District will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include wells, reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be required to provide land on which some of these facilities will be located. These sites shall be shown on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the District for such purpose. There may be conflicts with existing District facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the District for the relocation of these facilities. %/ Very,ti)ily your, General Mar-?k3ger�C'r; --4nq i nee DBP:je cc: Riverside County Dept. of Public Health/Indio SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 14 COMPANY R. W. RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA.92260 Re: Case No. C/Z 09-79 & DP 15-79 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA Melling Address P. O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 November 23, 1979 Location of Nearest Gas Main: In Country Club Drive _ This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas -Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions of federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact this office for assistance. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION ELMER M. KATZENSTEIN, Chairman, Rubidoux KAV S. CENICEROS, Hemet DAVID W. TER BEST, CCIITeio JESS E. LILLIBRIDGE, Corona RUSSELL E. CAMPBELL, Blythe KAV H. OLESEN, Palm Desert MARION V. ASHLEY, Perris PATRICIA NEMETH — A.I.P. — PLANNING DIRECTOR 4080 LEMON STREET, 9th FLOOR, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 November 14, 1979 Indio Administrative Center 46-209 Oasis Street, Room 304 JLL:7077DO Indio, California 92201 (714) 342-8277 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services, City pf Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane y i Palm Desert, CA 92260 �F RE: DP 15-79 Dear Paul: We have completed our review of the subject development. The following comments are provided: 1. The Cove Communities General Plan designates this area as Very Low Density Resi- dential with a maximum density of three dwelling units per acre. Major projects in this area under review by the County are maintaining an average density of three units per acre. We believe the proposed density to be too great. 2. Your transmittal reflects County zoning as R-1-1200. This is incorrect. Zoning is R-1-12,000. This zone requires a 12,000 sq. ft. lot and limits development to single family units. 3. Section 18.5 of the County Zoning Ordinance establishes planned residential develop- ment standards. We have enclosed a copy of those standards. We find the project deficient under those standards. Specifically, (a) No subdivision map proposed, (b) Density appears to exceed standard; 40% open area calculated on net project area may not be met, (c) Setbacks not consistent to standard, (d) Structures not consistent with zone limitation, i.e., R-1 clusters not to exceed two units, (e) Trash enclosures not provided, and (f) Substandard parking. 4. Recreational areas adjacent to street would appear to require some lighting for usage. The review package does not indicate method or restrictions to prevent conflict to adjacent residences or streets. 5. Streets within the project are substandard to County allowable private streets (36 ft. major interior and 32 ft. minor interior). Paul A. Williams DP 15-79 Page 2. November 14, 1979 6. No indication has been made as to right of way along Monterey or Country Club. The County Circulation Element classes both streets as Arterial Highways (110 ft. R/W). 7. Other concerns: a. Water services b. Sewer provision C. Traffic/Circulation - signalization potentials d. Air Resources - effects on quality e. Energy Conservation/Impacts f. Population - effects on schools g. Blowsand hazard h. Archaeology We believe an E.I.R. should be required before final review or approval, Further, we believe a redesign to be required to reduce densities. Should the City annex the project area, we would suggest density be restricted to 4 - 4.5 units per acre gross to insure transition from the more high urban city density to the lower, more rural density required by the County. We request that suggested conditions for approval be supplied to us when available. We appreciate the opportunity to review the proposal. We look forward to continued planning cooperation. Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Patricia Nemeth, A.I.P. - Planning Director John L. Libiez - Associa"te Planner JLL:mj May,ur Construction Inc. 8121 East Florence Avenue Downey, California 90240 (213) 927-3341 December 13, 1979 City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Secretary Subject: Case Number C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) Gentlemen: Over the past several months, the Mayer Group has been working with your staff and various other agencies in the City of Palm Desert to identify City needs which we, as developers of the proposed project, can feasibly satisfy, either wholly or partially. Discussions have focused on three primary needs: creation of a city park called for in the General Plan; development of "affordable" housing; and implementation of a traffic signal at the Country Club Drive and Monterey Intersection. The proposed Mayer Group project would address these needs as follows: City Park According to the City's current formula, development of the proposed project would require dedication of approximately two (2) acres to the City as park lands. We propose to exceed this requirement by 450 percent to nine (9) acres. Appraisers estimate that the fair market price of the additional seven acres would be approximately $300,000. The Mayer Group further proposes to grade the site and construct the appropriate street improvements, estimated to cost more than $150,000. And, as the proposed site plan reflects, six (6) public tennis courts would be located within the City Park with an estimated construction cost of $125,000. The Mayer Group's proposed park improvement package more than quadruples the size of the park and is worth nearly $600,0o0. City of Palm Desert December 13, 1979 Page Two 2. Affordable Housing The great majority of housing -- both that which currently exists and that which is planned for the foreseeable future -- is priced in excess of $135,000. The few homes priced under $100,000 are purchased immediately, indicating a deep wellspring of demand. Independent market research indicates that from now through 1985 the greatest single segment of demand lies within the $80,000 to $100,000 price range with the $100,000 to $125,000 range a distant second. This demand is, in large part, local demand for primary residences on the part of the area's growing number of employees (Eisenhower Hospital, etc.). With this demand in mind, the Mayer Group has carefully planned its project so that if it is approved in a timely manner without major cost -impacting alterations, it will be able to offer initial phases at prices beginning under $100,000. Further, we plan to communicate the project's existence directly to the area's employees to help insure their equitable opportunity to purchase. 3. Traffic Signal The current required contribution toward a future traffic signal at Country Club Drive and Monterey is $50.00 per dwelling. Based on the Mayer Group's proposed 264 units, its contribution would be $13,200. In order to cooperate with the Cities of Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage's efforts to insure the area's safety and to enhance its proposed community, the firm volunteers to contribute up to 25 percent (to $26,000) of the cost of the signal -- virtually doubling the requirement. We are very proud of our imaginative, high quality plan for a needed well - priced, attached home community to enhance the City of Palm Desert. We hope that you will concur and support our efforts to develop this project. Sin rely, MAY ONST UCTIO , Q. Mich el A. Mohler Vice President Lan Acquisition MAM: cg .• • COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEMAND FORECASTS MARKET PROFILES - JUNE 1979 PRICE RANGE 1979-80 1981-85*_ $50,000 - $65,000 170 120 $65,000 - $8o,000 34o 290 $30,000 - $100,000 910 690 $100,000 - $125,000 390 360 $125,000 - $150,000 310 280 $150,000 - $175,000 280 260 $175,000 - $200,000 250 240 $200,000+ 150 160 2800 2400 `annual demand GZ• Olt- /`fCWIt"d >p 15-75 000 el �ec fee FcKj?OV 1 � l9T, V i OF £NTAL Dec. 17 ,1979p�M of Wives Board of Planning Commissioners City Hall Palm Desert, Cal. 92260 Dear Commissioners: I would like to go on record as being very definitely in favor of approving the Developer's request for Annexation and zoning at the corner of Monterey Road and Country Club Drive... This will do much to act as the transition between the single family homes and the Mobile Home Park.. I own the 10 acre parcel directly across from the proposed tennis courts on Vista Dunes Road.West side.. Yours very truly, Manning Kless LJ PURVIS L. MARTIN. M. D. A PROFESSIONAL COR OMnON 550 WASHINGI'ON STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92103 December 17, 1979 ft cir, Vito DEC 2 0 1979 ENV1 C17Y 0p PALAt M pE IRCES 7. Palm Desert Planning Commission 45275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Commissioners Gentlemen: I own a parcel of land--#620-040-011 on Vista Dunes Road which runs parallel with Monterey Road and very close to the large parcel at the corner of Monterey and Country Club Drive which is under consideration for development now. I believe the improvement of the large corner parcel will do much to improve the entire area and I would like to be recorded in favor of granting this developer his re- quest for zoning and annexation. Thank you for your kind consideration of my request. Cordially yours, Purvis L. Martin, M.D. PLM:rlh TO FROM Palm Desert Planni Commission G< ge Bagatourian 45275 Prickly Pear Lane. 52SO Honeyweod Lane Palm Desert, California Anaheim, Cal Zoning and Annexation --Monterey and Country Club Drive Dec. 12. 1974 Gentlmen: O .�F Please record me in favor of granting the Zoning and Annexatitm, request of the Developer for the land parcel at Monterey and �FFs Country Club Drive ... I beleive it will do very much to improve the area and allow for orderly growth, as well as stadting the building of Monterey Road.. I own the parcel on Vista Dunes Road very close by the subject land Assessor's #620-040-010. With all due respect, I am Yours t George agatourian ... ,........,� ................ �... SPEED -MEMO C CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report on: Preannexation Zoning and Related Development Plan Applicant: Mayer Group, Inc., 8121 E. Florence Avenue, Downey, CA 90240 Case No(s): C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) Date: December 4, 1979 I. REQUEST Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1, 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7 (U.A.) (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac.) (Upon Annexation) or other zone as deemed appropriate, and approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre public park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive. LOCATIONAL MAP: II. BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING: STAFF REPORT December 4, 1979 - Page -2- D. PERIMETER TREATMENT: - Dedication and improvement of Monterey an& Country Club Drives. - Wind/(Interim) Blowsand protection on the north and west boundaries. E. CONCEPTUAL PLAN FEATURES: 1. Access - internal private street system with one entrance to Monterey Drive and one to Country Club Drive. 2. Density - 264 dwelling units on 39.1 gross acres = 6.75 d.u./ac. 3. Dwelling Description - modules of six units from one bedroom, two bath to two bedroom, two bath and den; one to two stories. 4. Open Space/Recreational Amenities - - 9 acre park site - 8 swimming/recreation areas within the residential portion of the project - Calculated open space, 59.69% of the net site. 5. Parking Provided - - covered, 568 spaces - bay, 42 spaces - street, 99 spaces III. DISCUSSION: A. ZONING/DESIGN CONSIDERATION: The subject request for preannexation zoning is accompanied by the required plan of development. In this instance, considerations for the Change of Zone and conceptual Development Plan overlap, because the density requested is at the high end of range provided by the General Plan. Each new residential development in the City is subject to payment of fees for park and recreation purposes, and/or dedication of land if the project site is located in an area designated in the General Plan for a future park facility. Typically, the payment of fees on raw land dedication does not satisfy the objective for providing a full range of recreation amenities for specific project occupants. Public park facilities are not intended to satisfy the needs of any specific project, but rather the community as a whole._ Reviewing the subject cases, the following is observed: • The General Plan depicts a park site on the subject property, for which dedication is required per the Subdivision Ordinance formula, with reservation for public acquisition of the balance. The Development Plan proposes dedication of a 9 acre (net) park site. • As provided by the Zoning Ordinance, the park site in this project is proposed to be used to satisfy a portion of the common open space required of developments in the Planned Residential zone. 'STAFF REPORT — December 4, 1979 Page -3- CONCEPTUAL PLAN: The residential plan, while being "tightly" arranged, creates a unique onclave of units with courtyard access. The internal street system connects project entrances on Monterey Drive and Country Club Drive. Driveways off these streets lead to parking courts which serve two building groups containing six dwelling units each. Ttie: site plan satisfies the City objective for providing variety and imagination in housing types. CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS: The architectural elevations -submitted sham a movement in building planes and vertical relief with two-story elements. Predominant materials are stucco walls-and_,tile.roofs. PROJECT ACCESS: Access to -the project on Country Club Drive must be reconciled with the McBail property to the south. Country Club Drive is planned to contain a raised center median island, therefore, left turn lanes and median breaks will need to be coordinated. DESIGN REVIEW: The Design Review Board viewed the conceptual plans as a discussion item on the November 27, 1979, agenda, but had no specific comments on the project design. F. FIRE MARSHAL RESPONSE: The Fire Marshal has forwarded an initial recommendation of project denial, based on the present response time to the site from existing facilities. This situation would change in the future when additional facilities are constructed, but at the present time it points the need to associate the actual construction of major new projects with facili- ties being "on line" and a reasonable response time being achieved (a Special Condition addresses this subject). A future fire station is planned at Cook Street and Country Club Drive._ - IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the justification contained in the draft Resolution: Recommend approval to the City Council of Case Nos C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) by -adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. , subject to conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 12,000 (RIVERSIDE COUNTY ZONE) TO PR-7 (U.A.) AND A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 264 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A NINE ACRE PARK, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY DRIVE. CASE NOS. DP 15-79 and C/Z 09-79 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of December, 1979, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by MAYER GROUP, INC. for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7 N .A.) (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac.) (Upon Annexation) or other zone as deemed appropriate, and approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre public park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive, more particularly described as: APN 620-180-003 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the City of Palm Desert "Environmental Quality Procedure, Resolution No. 7832," in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that this project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their recommendations and actions as described below: Change of Zone: The land use resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with adjacent existing and proposed land uses. b. The density resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with densities permitted in the adjacent areas. The proposed Change of Zone would be compatible with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan. Development Plan: a. That proposed development Plan is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. b. The proposed use is similar to and compatible with those contemplated on nearby properties. The design or improvement of the proposed develop- PLANNING COMMISSION ..,,JLUTION NO. Page -2- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7, S.P. (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 7 d.u./ac., Scenic Preservation Overlay) (Upon Annexation to the City of Palm Desert), as shown on the attached map lebeled Exhibit "A". 3. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of the overall conceptual Development Plan (Exhibit "B") as part of their consider- ation of the related Change of Zone, subject to those conditions labeled Exhibit "C", attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of December, 1979, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: WALTER SNYDER, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary m P.R.-7) S. P. COUNTY 0 F� 11324.5R I V E R S I D E CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE ■ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ EXHIBIT "C" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 15-79 Page -I- Standard Conditions: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with Exhibit A (Case No. DP 15-79) on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include, but are not limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process, and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all Municipal Code require- ments to the degree that the City could consider each phase as a single project. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to the issuance of any City permits for the commencement of construction on said project, the applicant shall agree in writing to these Conditions of Approval. 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in additions ' to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 7. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 8. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the development of this project per attached letter dated November 27, 1979 (as listed in items 1 through 7). 9. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 10. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 11. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ EXHIBIT "C" SPECIAL CONDITIONS Page -2- 1. 1at the 9 acre (net) park site shown on Exhibit "B" shall be de icated to the City of Palm Desert as a part of any final sub- div ion map; and, shall be fully developed in accordance with a plan proved by the Planning Commission prior to final occupancy Perm it eing granted for the last 50% of the dwelling units contempl ted in this approval. 2. A plan of rk development shall be submitted to the Design Review Board and Ci Park and Recreation Commission for recommendation to the Planni Commission, prior to approval of final construction drawings for th dwelling units. g Plans submitted for entrance location on the south side the Design Review process shall reconcile es PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ EXHIBIT "C" Page -2- SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. That the 9 acre (net) park site shown on Exhibit "B" shall be dedicated to the City of Palm Desert as a part of any final sub- division map; and, shall be developed in accordance with a plan approved by the Planning Commission prior to final occupancy permit being granted for the last 50% of the dwelling units contemplated in this approval. 2. A detailed plan of park development shall be submitted to the Design Review Board and City Park and Recreation Commission for recommendation to the Planning Commission, prior to approval of final construction drawings for the dwelling units. As a part of the review of this plan the level of developer participation in the improvements to the park site shall be defined. 3. Plans submitted for the Design Review process shall reconcile entrance location and median island design with property entrances on the south side of Country Club Drive. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building n.A Cafe+,. %.,411 nn+ 4eu,e a hiiilrlinn normit nr aiinw nrrimanry nn the IISe Emma P. Lum, J.D. announces THE REMOVAL OF HER LAW OFFICES TO 674 Commercial Street Suite 201-2nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Near Kearny St. Telephone: (415) 982-3499 ,gyp :bh-411.RIO � %��y'_ Mayer Construction Inc. 8121 East Florence Avenue Downey, California 90240 (213) 927-3341 December 13, 1979 City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Mr. Paul A. Williams, Secretary Subject: Case Number C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) Gentlemen: Over the past several months, the Mayer Group has been working with your staff and various other agencies in the City of Palm Desert to identify City needs which we, as developers of the proposed project, can feasibly satisfy, either wholly or partially. Discussions have focused on three primary needs: creation of a city park called for in the General Plan; development of "affordable" housing; and implementation of a traffic signal at the Country Club Drive and Monterey Intersection. The proposed Mayer Group project would address these needs as follows: 1. City Park According to the City's current formula, development of the proposed project would require dedication of approximately two (2) acres to the City as park lands. We propose to exceed this requirement by 450 percent to nine (9) acres. Appraisers estimate that the fair market price of the additional seven acres would be approximately $300,000. The Mayer Group further proposes to grade the site and construct the appropriate street improvements, estimated to cost more than $150,000. And, as the proposed site plan reflects, six (6) public tennis courts would be located within the City Park with an estimated construction cost of $125,000. The Mayer Group's proposed park improvement package more than quadruples the size of the park and is worth nearly $600,000. t City of Palm Desert December 13, 1979 „A Page Two S& 2. Affordable Housing The great majority of housing -- both that which currently exists and that which is planned for the foreseeable future -- is priced in excess of $135,000. The few homes priced under $100,000 are purchased immediately, indicating a deep wellspring of demand. Independent market research indicates that from now through 1985 the greatest single segment of demand lies within the $80,000 to $100,000 price range with the $100,000 to $125,000 range a distant second. This demand is, in large part, local demand for primary residences on the part of the area's growing number of employees (Eisenhower Hospital, etc.). With this demand in mind, the Mayer Group has carefully planned its project so that if it is approved in a timely manner without major cost -impacting alterations, it will be able to offer initial phases at prices beginning under $100,000. Further, we plan to communicate the project's existence directly to the area's employees to help insure their equitable opportunity to purchase. 3. Traffic Signal The current required contribution toward a future traffic signal at Country Club Drive and Monterey is $50.00 per dwelling. Based on the Mayer Group's proposed 264 units, its contribution would be $13,200. In order to cooperate with the Cities of Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage's efforts to insure the area's safety and to enhance its proposed community, the firm volunteers to contribute up to 25 percent (to $26,000) of the cost of the signal -- virtually doubling the requirement. We are very proud of our imaginative, high quality plan for a needed well - priced, attached home community to enhance the City of Palm Desert. We hope that you will concur and support our efforts to develop this project. MAIrely, ONST U/C�TIO VW Q . el A. Mohler President Land Acquisition M: cg . '] 0 COACHELLA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEMAND FORECASTS MARKET PROFILES - JUNE 1979 PRICE RANGE 1979-80 1981-85- $50,000 - $65,000 170 120 $65,000 - $80,000 34o 290 $80,000 - $100,000 910 690 $100,000 - $125,000 390 360 $125,000 - $150,000 310 280 $150,000 - $175,000 280 26o $175,000 - $200,000 250 24o $200,000+ 150 160 2800 2400 `annual demand Coa&& Uahq Rwwafi" aKd ?a* DibWd POST OFFICE DRAWER YYY 46-350 SOUTH JACKSON STREET INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 December 13, 1979 R C r' IVE D DEC 14 1979 Mr. Paul Williams, Director ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C Palm Desert Planning Department PALM DESERT 45-275 Pirckly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California Dear Mr. Williams: At their regular meeting on December 10, 1979 the Board of Directors of the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District discussed assumption of operation and maintenance of your proposed nine acre park at Monterey and Country Club. The Board was told that the park would be fully developed and that the cost to the District would be only operation and maintenance. Four specific points were made: 1. Is the site within Palm Desert City limits? 2. If the District were to pick up operation and maintenance responsibilities it must also be in on the planning and de- velopment phases to insure adequate planning and budgeting for the operation and maintenance. 3. The Recreation District should be consulted about planning because of the expertise and experience its staff possesses. 4. Do District budget projections indicate and ability to assume these operation and maintenance responsibilities? Since these areas could not be fully explored during the meeting the item was tabled until January 7, so they could be fully studied and answers prepared. We have a new majority on the Board and they want to look into the District philosophy and decide what way to go with the constraints now imposed. Thus the January meeting is very important in establish- ing a footing for future activities. I will be in touch with you immediately after the January 7 meeting. Respectfully, Gary D.�Doty Superin endent jd rei. 34T34e5 EmmA, P. LuM, J. D. ATTORNEY AT LAW 674 Commercial St. Suite 201 San Francisco. CA 94111 (415) 902-3999 - - N ovember 26, 1979 Paul A. Williams City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California 92260 Dear Mr. Williams: I have received your letter today. But Ms. Lum is out of town, and I don't know anything about it. So, would you please wait until Ms. Lum returns back from her vacation. She probably will be back at the end of this month and will contact you when she is back. Thank you. Sincerely, Nbc � v Sec, of Ms. Lum/ml INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Director of Environmental Services FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT:(CZ 09-79/DP 15�UPON ANNEXATION DATE: December 18, 1979 I bring to your attention that this developer should be required to install a left -turn pocket for traffic southbound on Monterey Avenue from Country Club Drive. I would also recommend that a left -turn pocket be installed on the northerly extension of Monterey Avenue for traffic southbound on Monterey. Also, it is very possible, according to the Master Storm Drain Plan, that an easement will be required on the easterly side of this property for storm drain purposes. ms 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 9226O TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE December 20, 1979 APPLICANT Mayer Group, Inc. 8121 E. Florence Avenue Downey, CA 90240 CASE NO: C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at is meeting of December 19, 1979 CONTINUED TO DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. X PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF January 10, 1979 FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File .i�','%. Gf� of P �Il=i��t� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 December 20, 1979 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1, 12,000 (RIVERSIDE COUNTY) TO PR-7 (U.A.) AND A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUC- TION OF 264 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A NINE ACRE PARK, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY DRIVE. CASE NOS. DP 15-79 and C/Z 09-79 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the Palm Desert City Council to consider a request by MAYER GROUP, INC. for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1(Riverside County Zone) to PR-7 (U.A.) (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac.) or other zone as deemed appropriate, and approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre public park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive, more particularly described as: APN 620-180-003 1324. 56' I' . CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Report on: Preannexation Zoning and Related Development Plan Applicant: Mayer Group, Inc., 8121 E. Florence Avenue, Downey, CA 90240 Case No(s): C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) Date: December 4, 1979 I. REQUEST Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1, 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7 (U.A.) (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac.) (Upon Annexation) or other zone as deemed appropriate, and approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre public park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive. LOCATIONAL MAP: H. BACKGROUND: A. ADJACENT ZONING: STAFF REPORT December 4, 1979 Page -2- D. PERIMETER TREATMENT: - Dedication and improvement of Monterey and Country Club Drives. - Wind/(Interim) Blowsand protection on the north and west boundaries. E. CONCEPTUAL PLAN FEATURES: 1. Access - internal private street system with one entrance to Monterey Drive and one to Country Club Drive. 2. Density - 264 dwelling units on 39.1 gross acres = 6.75 d.u./ac. 3. Dwelling Description - modules of six units from one bedroom, two bath to two bedroom, two bath and den; one to two stories. 4. Open Space/Recreational Amenities - - 9 acre park site - 8 swimming/recreation areas within the residential portion of the project - Calculated open space, 59.69% of the net site. 5. Parking Provided - - covered, 568 spaces - bay, 42 spaces - street, 99 spaces III. DISCUSSION: A. ZONING/DESIGN CONSIDERATION: The subject request for preannexation zoning is accompanied by the required plan of development. In this instance, considerations for the Change of Zone and conceptual Development Plan overlap, because the density requested is at the high end of range provided by the General Plan. Each new residential development in the City is subject to payment of fees for park and recreation purposes, and/or dedication of land if the project site is located in an area designated in the General Plan for a future park facility. Typically, the payment of fees on raw land dedication does not satisfy the objective for providing a full range of recreation amenities for specific project occupants. Public park facilities are not intended to satisfy the needs of any specific project, but rather the community as a whole. Reviewing the subject cases, the following is observed: • The General Plan depicts a park site on the subject property, for which dedication is required per the Subdivision Ordinance formula, with reservation for public acquisition of the balance. • The Development Plan proposes dedication of a 9 acre (net) park site. • As provided by the Zoning Ordinance, the park site in this project is proposed to be used to satisfy a portion of the common open space required of developments in the Planned Residential zone. STAFF REPORT December 4, 1979 B. CONCEPTUAL PLAN: Page -3- The residential plan, while being "tightly" arranged, creates a unique onclave of units with courtyard access. The internal street system connects project entrances on Monterey Drive and Country Club Drive. Driveways off these streets lead to parking courts which serve two building groups containing six dwelling units each. The site plan satisfies the City objective for providing variety and imagination in housing types. CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS: The architectural elevations submitted show a movement in building planes and vertical relief with two-story elements. Predominant materials are stucco walls and tile roofs. PROJECT ACCESS: Access to the project on Country Club Drive must be reconciled with the McBail property to the south. Country Club Drive is planned to contain a raised center median island, therefore, left turn lanes and median breaks will need to be coordinated. DESIGN REVIEW: The Design Review Board viewed the conceptual plans as a di,scussi,on item on the November 27, 1979, agenda, but had no specific comments on the project design. FIRE MARSHAL RESPONSE: The Fire Marshal has forwarded an initial recommendation of project denial, based on the present response time to the site from existing facilities. This situation would change in the future when additional facilities are constructed, but at the present time it points the need to associate the actual construction of major new projects with facili- ties being "on line" and a reasonable response time being achieved (a Special Condition addresses this subject). A future fire station is planned at Cook Street and Country Club Drive. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the justification contained in the draft Resolution: Recommend approval to the City Council of Case Nos C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. , subject to conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 12,000 (RIVERSIDE COUNTY ZONE) TO PR-7 (U.A.) AND A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 264 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A NINE ACRE PARK, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY DRIVE. CASE NOS. DP 15-79 and C/Z 09-79 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 4th day of December, 1979, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by MAYER GROUP, INC. for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7 (U.A.) (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac.) (Upon Annexation) or other zone as deemed appropriate, and approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre public park on 39.1 gross acres, located at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive, more particularly described as: APN 620-180-003 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the City of Palm Desert "Environmental Quality Procedure, Resolution No. 7832," in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that this project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their recommendations and actions as described below: Change of Zone: The land use resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with adjacent existing and proposed land uses. The density resulting from the Change of Zone would be compatible with densities permitted in the adjacent areas. The proposed Change of Zone would be compatible with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan. Development Plan: That proposed development Plan is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. The proposed use is similar -to and compatible with those contemplated on nearby properties. The desion nr imnrnvpmpnt of the nrnnncpd HPvP1nn- PLANNING COMMISSION Rt3OLUT1ON NO. Page -2- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 12,000 (Riverside County Zone) to PR-7, S.P. (U.A.) (Planned Residential, max. 7 d.u./ac., Scenic Preservation Overlay) (Upon Annexation to the City of Palm Desert), as shown on the attached map lebeled Exhibit "A". 3. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of the overall conceptual Development Plan (Exhibit "B") as part of their consider- ation of the related Change of Zone, subject to those conditions labeled Exhibit "C", attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of December, 1979, by the following vote, to wit: Uri" NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: WALTER SNYDER, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary ON R -1 12,000 TO P.R.-71 S. P. COUNTY OF71A�1324.56'����Z��� IVERSIDE - -C6CNfiRY---CLUB DRIVE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE GIIY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Page -1- EXHIBIT "C" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 15-79 Standard Conditions: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with Exhibit A (Case No. DP 15-79) on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include, but are not limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process, and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all Municipal Code require- ments to the degree that the City could consider each phase as a single project. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. Prior to the issuance of any City permits for the commencement of construction on said project, the applicant shall agree in writing to these Conditions of Approval. 6. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in additions to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 7. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 8. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the development of this project per attached letter dated November 27, 1979 (as listed in items 1 through 7). 9. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 10. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 11. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ EXHIBIT "C" SPECIAL CONDITIONS Page -2- 1. That the 9 acre (net) park site shown on Exhibit "B" shall be dedicated to the City of Palm Desert as a part of any final sub- division map; and, shall be developed in accordance with a plan approved by the Planning Commission prior to final occupancy permit being granted for the last 50% of the dwelling units contemplated in this approval. 2. A detailed plan of park development shall be submitted to the Design Review Board and City Park and Recreation Commission for recommendation to the Planning Commission, prior to approval of final construction drawings for the dwelling units. As a part of the review of this plan the level of developer participation in the improvements to the park site shall be defined. 3. Plans submitted for the Design Review process shall reconcile entrance location and median island design with property entrances on the south side of Country Club Drive. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ EXHIBIT IICII DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN November 27, 1979 Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Re: Case No: DP 15-79 Dear Mr. Williams, Page -3- P.O. BOX 248 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (7141 657-3183 We request denial of this project for the following reasons: 1. This development is beyond the 5 minute response limit for existing stations. 2. A development of this size will have substantial impact on our already overtaxed fire protection system. Should this development be approved, the following requirements shall apply. rja I / David J. Ortegel Fire Marsha l DJO:dt Attachment PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. _ EXHIBIT "C" Re: Case No: DP 15-79 Page -4- Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 15-79 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Interior street shall be a minimum of 28' excepting streets less than 150' in length may have a width of 24'. 7. Any cul-de-sac street greater than 150' in length shall have a turn -around. LOUNiY ESTABLISHED IN 1918 AS A PUBLIC . _ .9CY �TST RI GZ COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE BOX 1058 • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 92236 • TELEPHONE (714) 398-2651 DIRECTORS OFFICERS RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, PRESIDENT LOWELL O. WEEKS, GENERAL MANAGER - OHIEF ENGINEER TELLIS COMAS, VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUITON, SECRETARY C. J. FROST DENNIS M. NACKETT, AUDITOR WILL" B. GARDNER REDWINE AND SHERRILL, ATTORNEYS STEVE D. BU%TON November 26, 1979 File: 0163.11 0421.1 0721.1 Dept. of Environmental „ _y Services City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 T "' Re: Change of Zone 09-79 and D. P. 15-79 SW4 , Sec. 5, T5S, R6E Gentlemen: This area is protected from stormwater flows by the blhitewater River Stormwater Channel and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. The District will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to said area in accordance with the currently prevailing regulations of this District. The District will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include wells, reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be required to provide land on which some of these facilities will be located. These sites shall be shown on the tract -map as lots to be deeded to the District for such purpose. There may be conflicts with existing District facilities. We request the appropriate public agency to withhold the issuance of a building permit until arrangements have been made with the District for the relocation of these facilities. Verytr}jly your,&, General Ma DBP:je cc: Riverside County Dept. of Public Health/Indio ineer .. . R. W. RIDDELL Eastern Division Distribution Planning Supervisor City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA.92260 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LgtCOMPANY Re: Case No. C/Z 09-79 & DP 15-79. 3700 CENTRAL AVENUE • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA Mailing Address P.O. BOX 2200, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92516 November 23, 1979 Location of Nearest Gas Main: In Country Club Drive This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to serve the proposed project; but only as.an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Company has facilities in the area where the above named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be provided from an existing main without any significant; impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. The availability of natural gas service, as set fortis in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern.Califo•rnia Gas -Company is under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. We can also be affected by actions -of federal regulatory agencies. Should these .agencies take any acti.on which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance .in selecting the most effeczive applications of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy conservation programs, please contact this office for assistance. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION ELMER M. KATZENSTEIN, Chairman, Rubidoux KAY S. CENICEROS, Hemet DAVID W. TER BEST, Calimesa JESS E. LILLIBRIDGE, Corona RUSSELL E. CAMPBELL, Blythe KAY H.OLESEN, Palm Desert MARION V. ASHLEY, Perris PATRICIA NEMETH — A.I.P. — PLANNING DIRECTOR 40SO LEMON STREET, 9th FLOOR, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 November 14, 1979 JLL:7077DO Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services City pf Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Paul: Indio Administrative Center 46-209 Oasis Street, Room 304 Indio, California 92201 (714) 342-8277 RE: DP 15-79 V 41 i Fra1cr)0 ;fA�trof r nAZtt �.s , �iRiT, We have completed our review of the subject development. The following comments are provided: 1. The Cove Communities General Plan designates this area as Very Low Density Resi- dential with a maximum density of three dwelling units per acre. Major projects in this area under review by the County are maintaining an average density of three units per acre. We believe the proposed density to be too great. 2. Your transmittal reflects County zoning as 11-1-1200. This is incorrect. Zoning is R-1-12,000. This zone requires a 12,000 sq.- ft. lot and limits development to single family units. 3. Section 18.5 of the County Zoning Ordinance establishes planned residential develop- ment standards. We have enclosed a copy of those standards. We find the project deficient under those standards. Specifically, (a) No subdivision map proposed, (b) Density appears to exceed standard; 40% open area calculated on net project area may not be met, (c) Setbacks not consistent to standard, (d) Structures not consistent with zone limitation, i.e., R-1 clusters not to exceed two units, (e) Trash enclosures not provided, and (f) Substandard parking. 4. Recreational areas adjacent to street would appear to require some lighting for usage. The review package does not indicate method or restrictions to prevent conflict to adjacent residences or streets. 5. Streets within the project are substandard to County allowable private streets (36 ft. major interior and 32 ft. minor interior). . Paul A. Williams DP 15-79 Page 2. November 14, 1979 6. No indication has been made as to right of way along Monterey or Country Club. The County Circulation Element classes both streets as Arterial Highways (110 ft. R/W). 7. Other concerns: a. Water services b. Sewer provision C. Traffic/Circulation - signalization potentials d. Air Resources - effects on quality e. Energy Conservation/Impacts f. Population - effects on schools g. Blowsand hazard h. Archaeology We believe an E.I.R. should be required before final review or approval, Further, we believe a redesign to be required to reduce densities. Should the City annex the project area, we would suggest density be restricted to 4 - 4.5 units per acre gross to insure transition from the more high urban city density to the lower, more rural density required by the County. We request that suggested conditions for approval be supplied to us when available. We appreciate the opportunity to review the proposal. We look forward to continued planning cooperation. Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Patricia Nemeth, A.I.P. - Planning Director Jo L. Libiez - Associa a Planner JLL:mj 0 G2:QvzF o:ff 21:1 cn � 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Pursuant to Title 14, Div. 6, Article 7, Sec. 15083, of the California Administra- tive Code) Case No.: C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 Applicant/Project Sponsor: Common Project Name (if any) Mayer Group, Inc., 8121 E. Florence Avenue, Downey, CA 90240 Project Description/Location: Construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre park 1 Drive. ted at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey The Director of the Dept. of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, California, has found that the described project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of the Initial Study has been attached to document the reasons in support of this finding. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid poten- tially significant effects, may also be found attached. iDaul A. Williams, A CP / D to ir. of Environmental Services _r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE December 6, 1979 APPLICANT Mayer Group, Inc. 8121 E. Florence Avenue Downey, CA 90240 CASE No.: C/Z 09-79 and DP 15-79 (Upon Annexation) The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of December 4, 1979 X CONTINUED TO December 19, 1979 DENIED APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. G� OO u i�s�il �^5'rn�v�ii�t� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 CITY OF PALM DESERT LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1, 12,000 (RIVERSIDE COUNTY) TO PR-7 (U.A.) AND A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUC- TION OF 264 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A NINE ACRE PARK, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND MONTEREY DRIVE. CASE NOS. DP 15-79 AND C/Z 09-79 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before Desert Planning Commission to consider a request by MAYER GROUP, approval of a Change of Zone from R-1 (Riverside County Zone) to (Planned Residential District, max. 7 d.u./ac.) or other zone as appropriate, and approval of a Planned Residential Development ti construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre public part gross acres, located at the northeast corner of Country Club Dri, Monterey Drive, more particularly described as: APN 620-180-003 the Palm INC. for PR-7 (U.A deemed allow on 39.1 e and 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT,CAUFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A "DRAFT" NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the follow- ing listed projects will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration should be adopted: CASE NOS DP 15-79 and /Z 09- 9 Request for approval of a Change of Zone from R-1, 12,000 (River- side County) to PR-7 (U.A.) and a Planned Residential Development to allow construction of 264 condominium units and a nine acre park, located at the northeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Drive. CASE NO. CUP 09-79 Request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and operation of an expanded electrical distribu- tion substation in conjunction with existing substation facili- ties, located 250 feet south of Highway 111 and 120 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. An appeal from this determination may be made to the Planning Commission within eight (8) days of the date of posting of this public notice by filing an appeal in accordance with Resolution No. 78-32, with the De- partment of Environmental Services located at 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, California. If no appeal is filed within the said time, this determination shall become final. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, AICP Director of Environmental Services Date of Public Notice Z l- !O_ Date Appeal Period Expires METHOD OF NOTICING: Posting `s'Mailing to owners of property within 300' ��>4 Publication in newspaper 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Case No.: C/Z 09-79 & DP 15-79 Project: Applicant: Condominium Project and Public Park Mayer Group, Inc. Enclosed please find materials describing a project for which the following is being requested: a Change of Zone from County R-1-1200 to PR-7 upon annexation and a development plan for a 264 unit condo- minium complex including a ten acre public park on approximately 39.6 acres located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. The attached data was prepared by the applicant and is being forwarded to you for comments and recommended Conditions of Approval. The City is interested in the probable impacts on the natural environment (e.g. water and air pollution) and on public resources (e.g. demand for schools, hospitals, parks, power generation, sewage treatment, etc.) Your comments and recommended conditions of approval must be received by this office prior to 5:00 p.m. November 26 , 1979, in order to be discussed by the Land Division Committee at their meeting of November 28• The Land Division Committee (comprised of Director of Environmental Services, City Building Official, City Engineer, Fire Marshal and a representative of CVCWD) will discuss the comments and recommended conditions of approval and will forward them to the Planning Commission through the staff report. Any information received by this office after the receipt deadline will not be discussed by the Land Division Com- mittee nor will it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consid- eration. truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services PAW/ ss PLEASE RETURN MAP WITH COMMENTS SSa2)=0C&UM2 (F B OmR9 ***CHANGE OF ZONE*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Applicant ( Please Prim) 4:3121 E. 1oa�lcE AQtE 2 3 Mailing Address Teleo one VowNE( . 4a. 90249 City I State Zip- Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) O'Hi C?E o� ZoaE �QoM cz I.12000 /fJ JEKSID't PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 40 AL ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. &20' 150 'C)03 EXISTING ZONING Property Owner Authorization THE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF I I DO BY MY SIGNATURE Applicant's Signature • r v.� IG T IS D STATE FILING 0 4. . A 1 i I SIGN URE SERT OF ALL LIA IL E IS GREEME SIGN T RE SIGNATIJRE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATU� ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER ARE THE OWNER (S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- J 0 RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. SOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES R GARDIN ANY DEED RES- CTIONS THAT MAY BPPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY OE RIBEO EREIN. res".1I U kl I I A 3fA 74 ACCEPTED BY CASE D a�j REFERENCE CASE N0. DA E Supporting Data: -}- 1. Name of Applicant MQ`�(EfL CRo�G 2.-.This request is made for property described as: Exact legal description - 150L)-MW 67r ���(- or- i-RF— SovrauasT M ew 5E-4MOrJ $ ° S- 3 3. Total area of site: 4. Existing Zoning: K ' desci 5. Proposed Zoning: 6. Assessor's Parcel No.: 39. (o ax-re,S . more than 1 zone requested,, g ►2 O©O be here or attach map 7. The property is located at between C un CI . stye t here or attach map) %2D I'SD • 003 , 8. The present use of the property is . VOL 9. General Plan Designation: 10. The applicant offers the following reasons to justify the request for a Change of Zone: 1 1 C11.he applicant shall submit a minimum of twelve (12) accurate scale drawings of the site (one colored) and the surrounding area showing: - existing streets and property lines - existing structures - access and utility easements - topographic contours at intervals of not more than two (2) feet. 12. The applicant shall submit a list of all owners of property located within �! 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. The list shall V3ti VV ' be keyed to a map showing the location of these properties and shall include o the name and address as shown on the latest available assessment role of the PVC Riverside County Assessor's Office. '--,/13. The applicant shall submit a completed Environmental Assessment form. 14. The applicant shall provide such additional information as the Director of Environmental Services may require to determine whether the granting of a Change of Zone would endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare. The application may be filed only by the owner of said property and shall be signed by the owner or by a person with a Power of Attorney, in writing (attached) from the owner authorizing a application or by the Attorney -at -Law for the owner. Indicate your au ority b I am the owner of said property. I am the agent for the owner of said property (attach written authorization). I have a Power of Attorney from the owner authorizing the application I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at -�an this day of � . 1 r Sherman Harris Mayer Group Inc. C/O Broaddus Ent. 8121 E. Florence Ave. 324 S. Harbor Blvd. Downey, CA 90240 Santa Ana, CA 92704 620-180-001 & 002 B & J Investments Mayer Group Inc. 7713 Fay Street, Ste. A 8121 E. Florence Ave. La Jolla, CA 92037 Downey, CA 90240 620-180-003 Broaddus Enterprises 324 S. Harbor Blvd. Santa Ana, CA 92704 620-180-004 Howard Doherty } 8841 S. Pleasant Chicago, IL 60620 620-070-016 Emma P. Lum 665 Grant Ave. San Francisco, CA 94108 620-070-017 ® �Z 1S9 �9 Marie Rosen 190 E. 72nd Street New York, NY 10021 400w� a.z:,. _�-;_.• nw 1,.:,.r,xem�.j' 620-070-018 i McBail Co. 3732 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Suite 390 Lafayette, CA 92549 620-190-045 & 002 Foundation for the Re- tarded Children P.O. Box 1183 Palm Desert, CA 92260 620-190-079 Morton Schiffer William Troy C/O Mandel 835 Myrtle Ave. Brooklyn, NY 11206 t2!- Igo -oii Ballew/McFarland, Inc. 74-075 El Paseo, Suite A7 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Ballew/McFarland, Inc. 74-075 E1 Pasco, Ste. A-7 Palm Desert, CA 92260