The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutUNIVERSITY PARK 01, of f t 10 16 ]'a,�` i w� p, ' ! y �• �.STY , ' r•r�+ �J}'! .!.` 1 f , . v ` f t + xi i, f, fir.. r �•t 1 4+ 4 :v t VIP M a s t e r D e v e lop m e n t P I a n May 10, 2006 developer PALM DESERT FUNDING CO . , LP . C / 0 H O VER DEVELOPMENT C O . , I NC . 3 S A N J 0 A Q U I N P L A Z A S LtI T E 2 1 5 N E W P 0 R T BEACH CA . 9 2 6 6 0 ( 9 4 9 ) 6 4 4 - 7 6 0 0 architecture I planning WILLIAM H E Z M A L H A L C H ARCHIT E C T S , I N C . ( 949 ) 2 5 0 - 0 6 0 7 K T G Y ( 949 ) 851 - 2 1 33 engineer R B F CONSULTING ( 760 ) 3 4 6 - 7 4 8 1 landscape architecture RGA LAN DSCAPE ARCH ( T E C T S , I NC . ( 760 ) 5 6 8 - 3 6 2 4 permitting agency CITY OF PALM DESERT At its regular meeting of April 27-2006.the Palm Desert City Council considered and approved the University Park Master Plan (UPMP), Change of Zone to Add the Planned Community Development Overlay Zone (PCD)to the Existing PR-5 Zoning,and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact as it Relates Thereto for 190T;- .Acres Generally Located South of Gerald Ford and East of Portola Avenue (74-500 College Drive Case No. C/Z 06-04 and University Park Master Plan. By Ordinance No. 11 16 fhs Coc_r;en:tics been a oCuced by Vv r,ar Hezr a!ha'cr ,, _ i [ t e C t P e fo sc of ers:ty Par'<.Pa,r" - Dese..Caffom:a 6,11 r7&.1S -eservee Nc pa,of:rs�o_u—e,r o ean< rc king graphics electr-or. file. o%r-ecra>ocai. roud ng photocopying �r a--),of?e,t--71 of a _ C _ e-f u. Hezrraihalu-A•_rite:t 2006 W,!liarr Fiez!ralhalch Arai sects i.._ r„otc red t> Dec 'Le j;.t\ _ _Zr _.. .. 2 R�cpi I � � 9 2006 CQMMUN DEVELOP:^':di'iirp,�RTtiIUiT CITY OF PALM DESERT RECEIVED contents APR 1 ; 2CO6 COMMUNITY DE'„_OP',7"jT 77l7-7 CITY OF PALM DESERT Purpose of Document 5 n General Plan 5 d W U �Project Vision 9 Guiding Principles 10 - n The Site / Plan Site Context 13 Land Use Plan 16 Illustrated Site Plan 17 ' Product Criteria 19 Open Space / Parks 34 ► V V W Circulation Network 38 —� — Street Sections 39 Landscape The Theme 47 Plant Palette 47 Perimeter Streets and Themed Blvds. 51 Architecture The Styles S7 Development Criteria Purpose 67 Development Standards 68 f / 3 purpose of document This document represents the Master Development Plan for University Park. It im- plements the PCD (planned community development overlay) zone and regulates the basic land use and development criteria of the property. All product depicted is prototypical in nature, and subsequent to adoption of the document, individual builders will submit plans for architectural review. general plan The General Plan goals and policies for the proposed University Park project area are included in the greater University Park Planning Area designation (2,075 acres) and four land use designations, Medium Density Residential (R-M), Low Density Residential (R-L), High Density Overlay (HDO), and Open Space/Public Parks (OS/PP). All parcels within this Master Development Plan fall within the Medium Density Residential (R-M) and Low Density (R-L) designation. These categories, include single family development and parks with shaded open space, recreation, and other amenities. Condominiums may also be developed on this property. The overall intent of the R-M designation is to encourage development of a wide variety of dwelling units at moderate densities, while the R-L designation calls for lower den- sity single family detached homes. PROJECT VISION- Introduction. Stunning natural beauty balanced'by dynamic At the vibrant heart of University Park is College Drive, provid- urban amenities is the essence of University Park. Directly ing safe connectivity to neighborhoods, parks, and the Univer- adjacent to a new University campus, and a short drive from sity through the incorporation of a multiuse circulation system incredible golf courses and world class shopping, University designed for pedestrians, bicycles, and golf carts. A traditional, Park represents the convenience and sophistication of urban modified grid pattern of local streets provides the framework living juxtaposed with the natural environment. Offering a within each neighborhood, extending the pedestrian environ- broad spectrum of housing types and sizes at a range of prices, ment to each home. Parks are as much a part of the com- University Park has been planned to appeal to a wide variety munity experience as the mountains, offering opportunities for of homeowners.The result is a community as diverse in color, relaxation and recreation from sunrise to sunset. Community texture, and pattern as the desert itself, providing a unique amenities such as barbecue areas, playgrounds, and basketball place to call home. courts will be featured. Along the eastern edge, mixed use and commercial districts are envisioned to include a plaza, main A small town community with urban sophistication, Univer- street and public spaces. r•� sity Park is the gateway to the city of Palm Desert, and will significantly benefit the greater Coachella Valley. As a Master A balanced land use mix and diversified residential product Planned Community, University Park's design embodies the types provide the opportunity to live close to employment, qualities of a great American college town: intimate neighbor- shopping, recreation and a major learning center. The end hoods,tree-shaded sidewalks, inviting open spaces, and archi- result is an attractive, walkable community with a small college tectural diversity in a strategic location. town atmosphere that encourages social interaction, while ag- ing with elegance and visual richness. � 1 I _ Jl Figure I View of Neighborhood C& j D from park. ' Homes face outward toward a two acre central open space,featuring flat turf areas as well as grassy slopes. Other amenities include two shaped tot lots, a basketball court and sand volleyball court •i yy F GUIDING PRINCIPLES— ¢, Universityflark incorporates many elements reminiscent of college Optimize open space relationships. towns of the early 1900s, in concordance with what has become Provide community gathering spaces as well as recreational known as traditional neighborhood design principles. These opportunities that are easily accessible to all residents. z � involve increased connectivity between diverse land uses, Integrate the natural beauty and setting of the property decreased dependence on the automobile, and a heightened into all land uses. 3 sense les of the start of a Implementation succe sful col mmunhe following design pdn- Create connectivity. � r � i P ity. i communit interaction b providing enhanced access.to support services and educational ' C Create a "Community." Create an innovative, dynamic opportunities with both pedestrian connections and "virtual" Wyk community focused on life long learning through connection and cyberspace connections. . i identification with the University. Evoke a sense of"pride of place" , where people love to live b encouraging social, civic, and leisure) Encourage diversity. Encourage physical, social,P P Y g g Y S tY• g P Y interaction. economic, and artistic diversity through the inclusion of a variety of styles of living. Providing a wide range of home sizes and prices Celebrate uniqueness of place. Reinforce and capitalize results in a richness of experience for all residents. on the unique qualities of each neighborhood and the surrounding environment through land planning, architecture, and landscape Integrate environmentally responsible practices. design., Encourage "environmentally responsible" practices in the plan- ning, design and implementation of the community. All homes will conform to the progressive energy requirements established by the City of Palm Desert. 10 u r � b., s* ' t J A j ♦ I. -3Q,low—Alen 44 U OW 44 r ; t � , F t' 4�.�* �� ..'S ry �j` ...ill`..♦ { _4 THE SITE / PLAN R r f .to i r 7 - I•' r n r, r _ t a, R F o �� ' y {FF{ q • !` A r e. iA 'A.— . • � •Lt.4 weiL Ike Al - Figure 2— Looking North from Frank Sinatra west of Cook. THE SITE / PLAN Directly adjacent to a new University ' SITE CONTEXT- campus, and a short drive from incredible The dominant adjacency to University Park is the joint Palm golf courses and world class shopping, Desert campus of Califomia State University San Bernadino University Park represents the convenience and the University of California Riverside directly to the east, and sophistication of urban living juxtaposed with along Cook Street. Single Family homes currently exist across the natural environment. Portola Avenue on the western boundary. A future mixed use development is being planned for the north adjacency, along with a large public recreation center (see Figure 3). 13 � �� •ice - Y �� - :,rlt_ Us l may` �� •7' - -i , _ - Y �'`•- f 14 UJ ui cc U; IL r W: � m ! VZ �Q> aai �r � � G a r. "•.• �� -r .a J Js U LU 3 r AF low ui G ■r • ,+ kn Lot ui LL O irods w �� Z l9 1 LU Olt r� T _ .I� Imi ,A or t dw rt Rat--ti , CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY -t TALV DESERT CAMPUS flit .: �+S'�., •�. 'fir ,�.• � .. ..�.rim Figure 47--Site 1 a � •�a _.._ �dam':.:i a.--..., ___,._ - _•. __ �)�Z F •�. Desert � • - --- Will adjacenciesP Portola Avenue >_ Well Site I / C` .6 AC C, 50'x100' Lots SITE SUMMARY 5.7 DU/AC Planning Area Product GROSS/AC OU/AC D.U. 24.8 AC A Auto Court S.F.D. 11.5 10.0 115 141 D.U. v B S.F.D./Town- 22.9 10.0 213 \ p` C 5,000 SF S.F.D. 24.8 5.7 141 \ D 5,500 SF S.F.D. 20.9 4.9 102 E 4275 SF S.F.D. 24.8 5.7 141 Park F 3,570 SF S.F.D. 10.2 7.1 72 \ 2.1 AC D Subtotal 115.1 6.7 784 55'x100'Lots 7,200 SF Lots(T.T.Map 32655) 73.8 3.6 268 4.9 DU/AC Public Parks 11.2 20.9 AC Detention/Well Sites_ 4.0 Approved Tentative - 102 D.U. Total 204.1 AC 1052 D.U. Tract Map#32655 - 7,200 Sq.Ft. Lots Density Disclaimer Densities will vary dependent on site and building cntena. 3.7 DU/AC �- 73.8 AC 1- 122, Pacific Avenue 1.4 AC Detention Site/ 268 D.U. - Entry Monumentation E 45'x95'Lots 5.7 DU/AC t/ 24.8 AC 7 % 141 D.U. 4 AC' � Park Q; 4.2 AC 42'x84'Lots 7.1 DU/AC Well Site Well Site 10.2 AC �� 5 AC 6 AC 72 D.U. etention Site _f_ B .9 AC S.F.D.!Townhomes 10.0 DU/AC Commercial ��- LAND USE PLAN- �. 22.9 AC 10.2 AC / -�. Creative and imaginative design is encouraged for the residential home 213 D.U. p builders of University Park. The planning areas will fall within the "Medium Den- > A / /- sity" category of 4 to 10 homes per acre or the "Low Density" catagory of 1-4 \ Auto Court S.F.D. ` D �e homes per acre based on gross parcel acreage. Both single family detached and C \. 10.0 DU/AC ` / attached homes will be featured in order to appeal to a range of income levels 11.5 AC b 115 D.U. Park / i and buyer preferences. 2.5 AC \ j Commercial ��/ `..�►�)))/ The first priority in the design of the Land Use Plan for University Park is com- Mixed-Use �.. o �_� atibili with existing and proposed land uses. The lowest density homes are Commercial P tY g P .P y ° Z°° aoo e°° no located at the western portion of the site near existing single family homes.The N highest density homes are assigned to portions of the site that are adjacent to 1 mixed use areas and commercial uses. Public parks ranging from 2.1 acres to 4.2 Cook street Q acres have been strategically located to allow easy access from every residential Figure 5-Conceptual land use plan neighborhood.Total building coverage for the entire development is less then 30% and does not include the major back bone streets in that calculation. , 16 Portola Avenue _ .. _. _ .- _ _ _._- _... ...��--`C Gam.• .yy:,�•.,...{-,paL 4�_.'� •i��l;v+..�.r.�+ Well i Sit . - - Parcel C TTM#34055 r L �.T 0 LL 1 Parcel D TTM#34055 Pacific Av nue I i —Parcel E _ .---- — •� �.�� TTM#34057 LL C..i Parcel F TTM#34074 'C011e R / O � / - 9e Dr1ve Commercial r - chno logy r VA OXoan \j tjs / Mixe - L- LL i v - - Cook Street IN Figure 6—Illustrated Site Plan 17 ` i riti.pr...•.�� _ r a.:. �a r}-'14L.-.'yf.-.. � �. . r r' '�'�r.�—+. �,~,� •j �..� �. `.-.r ., ', -�Y. IM �0 y- !` mom. !♦ �� ` � s �� ystint ,� �� :-v f ,� C•�4 �. .I••'� "fir �` c, � t -1.... -'... , Z11� J ~ 1 r.e11r2r AN „ VOW AIL AP4 J r n -. •'� � ,fit � r -� " ' x. '�� -,... ;�� 1 I Figure 7 View of Neighborhood E w4W from park. i. ., A four acre public park is surrounded by single family homes creating an 0 environment for all to enjoy.A variety r n• • � of architecture styles and garage place ments create a dynamic streetscape �� +► �wlR � f' . facing the park, n a i . �a PRODUCT CRITERIA- Traditional neighborhood design promotes a high emphasis on the visual,quality of neighbor- �, hood streets. University Park will be designed so that the "living" portion of the homes is •� ' ; r- ( ' ? ; ' ,;, oriented toward the street, in order to minimize the impact of the garage. A variety of garage placements, such as deeply recessed garages;tandem garages, split garages, and porte-cocheres, along with attractive landscaping will result in 'residential neighborhoods with a desirable street scene ambiance. ' - Another consideration is the attention to detail of all four sides of a residence, rather than an emphasis on only the front. Since many homes back onto internal collector streets,the design of the rear elevations is important. The inclusion of auxiliary units and casitas is encouraged within traditional single family neighborhoods. Homes within parcels A, C, D, E and F will have private rear yards, and parcel B will feature homes with and without private rear yards. Parcels A and B will include private recreation areas. 1 ► * r a +rd4 r �� i 4 . y ''',••• ,:.r� This section provides general design criteria and guidance for the neighborhoods of University .�;. Park. All residential product represented herein is prototypical architecture and individual build- 1 ,F.�. ers will submit detailed plans for architectural review. For detailed zoning requirements, refer to y ♦�, , A; the Development Criteria section, page 67. ti. 19 Rear Yard (Homeowners Slope ---------- Responsibility) Parking and Sidewalk on 9.5' P.U.E. Typical Tree Pocket Front Yard Both Sides of Street .\ Typical Building Plot P ae creation PLANNING AREA A —Motor Court Homes re Homes are arranged in a group of five within a motor court duster.The / site area is 11.5 ac., and the density is approximately 10.0 homes per acre. Target unit sizes are anticipated to be 1,300 S.F. - 2,800 S.F.The product shown here is representative of a product type that could be built on this parcel area.The merchant builder who acquires this site will submit product that will yield the same density as what's represented here, but not necessarily in the same configuration. , It _ ----- Conceptual Site Plan Densities will vary dependent on site and building criteria. 20 Final map may be subject to additional revisions. i r+^wan u �m -- �� I I i��{pI� h� ' � .11'�_ ..11 li�, �Pi�,� ll. I uil!`'l`I :"�.I �l�l I ,ii,l' 'I��UI' (��h� .11� ��'if,l ;h� _��Illi��', �IQ�(�I�!I ill;: .��i„ �s 1'�,. � I� •��I��ul�i ,, `�,. -�� I I _II '— =� �FI - -iIIII �" 1 ��'•Y _il��_ N �' I I ---� _� � -1-i1■ ■ --II■ I—I—I� ',.. 1 __ �_ Y �� I ( — � I l) • _ I � r=1_I I_Isl ' I� •/~� � 'S.'� a '�'�" �E'� I_I I—I —I ^� - _.I f I �� ` 1 ��' sue-. t Typical -t Scene- Prototypical Product CanopyMotor Court Cluster Rear Yard Rear Yard 15, Rear Yard Small Tree Typ. Garage 24"Box Porch 5'. Garage Garage Rear Rear Yard Yard Garage uorage Urb Pocket Street Typical36"Box 2Ar Box • f Rear Yard (Homeowners Responsibility) - -- - ------ ---- --- - ----- ---- ----Parking and Sidewalk on- ------ ----- --- - ----- - --- -- - � �;�. .fit', Front Yard Typical Tree Pocket Both Sides of Street 9.5' P.U.E. --- ---- --- - ------ --- ---- --------- ---- --- - ----- - -- _ Private Recreation Typical Building Plot " Area r PLANNING AREA B -Motorcourt Homes Homes are arranged in a group of six, as a motorcourt cluster. The site area for the entire parcel is 22.9 ac, and the net density is approximately 10.0 homes per acre. Target unit sizes antici- pated are 1,600 S.F. - 2,800 S.F. c r Densities will vary dependent on site and building criteria. Conceptual Site Plan 22 Final map may be subject to additional revisions. _ •a.,_ � �'"`^,.,r a• • w s• a ,. . �t •aaa r.��!a.� • t w. "y,� :. �. r �• Ar �. 42 V, f� o. Typical Street Scene-Prototypical Product motor Court Motor Rom Yard Row Yard 15, Row Yard Row Yard Canopy Tree Typ. Ir Box Ger." Grw Row Yard Rw Yard Tree Podurt Street Tree Typ. W Box • r• 1 TypicalPlotLing Diagram 23 Y Street O� O O e ' O ' 0 -- - -- 1 - - --- -- - --- Lane 24' +C` =-- - --- - --- -- - - - --- --- - --- -- - - - --- - --- - - ---- - -- - -- --- - --- -- 0, Private -- Recreation Typical Building Plot Area PLANNING AREA B Triplex Homes o Homes are arranged in three unit buildings as a•triplex plotted in com- bination with a six unit motorcourt cluster. The site area for the entire u Q parcel is 22.9 ac, and the net density is approximately 10.0 homes per acre. Target unit sizes anticipated are 1,700 - 2,600. ° 0 c D O c. E R F B A Densities will vary dependent on site and building criteria. 24 Final map may be subject to additional revisions. Conceptual Site Plan • x ..... kill) , P. ,1 t 1 i r r Typical Street Scene— Prototypical Product Tri—Plex P.U.E Garage a Garage Garage Garage Garage Garage * • Garage Garage Garage Garage Garage Garage ° • 1 s PNMI qj .u.E 5'Sidewalk x - - Curb Parking Typ. Typical Plotting Diagram Tree Pocket Medium Canopy Tree Typ. Street Tree Typ. Small Canopy Tree Typ. 24"Box 36"Box 24"Box ZS Tree pockets will be included along park side of street ---Typical Tree Park f Poc et Front R and arking and sidewalk on 36' Both Sides of Street 9.5' P.U.E. `�� -- I , Rear Yard *Refer to Note (Homeowners — Responsibility) ----------------------- Slope Area -- -- - - - - - - Toe of Slope P r--r—r-�- -r- r---1 ----------- Typical I 1 I Building Plot 1L . .L . .I- .I. -I. . .1 . . L . .1� I Ir PLANNING AREA C--Detached Homes I � Conceptual Plan Information. The lot sizes are 50 x 100, and the target square footage is anticipated to be 2,400 -'3,200 S.F. Density is approximately 5.7, homes per acre, and the site area is I I �T — —I — L • — — L — �L 24.8 acres. \ ` I - I t - I Densities will wry eeoeneew or sfte and Rnoi mop may be subject to oadltionai revisions. Conceptual Site Plan *Subsequent to Planning Commission approval of TTM 34055,an additional 10'has been added to the open space area at the southeast comer of Portola Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive.The 26 setback from back of curb measures 70'with a width of over 170'at the project wall. a r JOIN p `I! � II ut ;�'"',!+"" I ��( �I F �'I{ ��'�k'! ��.��,�..'!dR•' --�-- - _ - - = Ilt�� rl� !� I �l{:' . ��' �'.►III''E��(�!1<�� ":ll�'!! �� ! I�IS�.:�N:�!i1,I„r ._ �;, - - — — r ! Il, .,.�-,� Ilill ; ►1��E t •. � , ��. ,fi ii. illl I� .fl � �_ - --__ . _ . _ .i II s L—AW I ETA Typical Street Scene,- ••'�... •• .� • . I I i y — �I, ,-; .#�.:w. �� — _—i j i-i—��-� `�-'� � —� � -1 �=:.,•• _ _ � � _ � I �,.I,�I►Ii I .�. �. — — I l� �I f� . '"?�, � _I� s.. .x`=• —" - -- — �''r I 7K- ,r�• ��`'��—� '—' �w.. s�.�.c-- �r- - a Prototypical'Produlci 1 x 11 Lot Sizes Rear Yard Typ. 1 Patio Patio Patio Garage Garage Porch -`-' • �' r �M 5'Sidewalk -Curb PI re t � f` TypicalTree Pocket • J Tree pockets will be Park included along park ; side of street Front Yard Typical Tree 9.5' P.U.E.. Parking and Sidewalk on 36' Pocket Both Sides of StreetIF I \ I -- --- -- ----L--- -- -__ -L------- --- -- I I � I � Rear Yard (Homeowners Responsibility) ---- -- - ----- --- -- _ 1 -= tt--- t,.-- 1 ------------ . . L_ . L I_ .1 1 . i � To of Slope " I I \ Typical Building.Plot —� �- - --I � � �_ li ILL . . -I �_ . . PLANNING AREA D -Detached Homes Conceptual Plan Information. The lot sizes are 55' x 100', and the target square footage is anticipated to be 3,000 - 3,800 S.F. Density is approximately 4.9 homes per acre, and the site area is 20.9 acres. 4 I, ---�_�_ - ------- -- --'------J I Il 11 E F F ; I .I _I' ' ___TF_I• • . . I- . I _ .I. � Conceptual Site Plan Densities will vary dependent on site and building criteria. 28 Final map may be subject to additional revisions. I l NUJ 1. Ag a f Typical Street Scene - Prototypical Product 55'x 100'Lot Sizes Rear Yard Typ. 20' Patio Patio Patio Patio r � Garage v v r r v ° Court v_ In vi 5 5 Porch D-7 Garage Porch Garage �f Garage Porch I T — — .5*P.u.& Curb 5'Sidewolk— Parking Typ. Tree Pocket—/ Street Tree Typ. Small Canopy Tree Typ. 24"Box 24"Box Typical Plotting Diagram 29 Tree pockets will be included along park Park - side of street 9.5' P.U.E.. Front Yard Typical Tree Pocket 36' Parking and Sidewalk on \ Both Sides of Street i 1 I 1 Rear Yard Toe of Slope (Homeowners Responsibility) T Typical Building Plot , ---- --- -- ---- --- --- --- ---- ---- __ L .I. J . L .�1__I L .1 J I.--1 PLANNING AREA E—Detached Homes / . . . . Conceptual Plan Information. The lot sizes are 45'x 95', - I. I I I I /- - --=----.-------- and the target square footage is anticipated to be 1,800- 2,800 �/ � - ------__ ____ ____-__ •___ •____ ____ ___ _-_------------------- - S.F. Density is approximately 5.7 homes per acre, and the site,is 24.8 acres. � \• / •� I • — . i i \C , 1 . \/ _ 1 s �✓/ 1 .. I .y = i /• i� / \/ ;/ \.. \ ______ -------------'-- --_ ___.__--_----_-- IM 1-1 L .I. —1. . L . .I— 1 . -1 L . t Densities will vary dependent on site and building criteria. Conceptual Site Plan 30 Final map may be-subject to additional revisions. III IIII II I1 i IIIII I'III I!!!li��Iil i Ilir!' IIIIIIIII! �!!)(�IS1pn,�11lllill IIIII��IIFjI�{!III�IIH��I�IiI�,�i►��I��I�i�lli _ �i_ �1 I I III ►� 1 ± ,, ,,ail 1 u . .. ;± ,,�, ,,nl II. � ��, _ �• ,, I��II�htl .III I��J �' I ,1' JI � — � '' `\. ��.��•� -- - ,, - l,IJJ II: 1 � .�'_R •art ..�:. ...._..�. ._ .It �•Ifl 'iii■ _..-,° III�' 11! �l l �'t Ii i _ I �I_I Il � i-` .,i��i � ��i i i� �"i�l.��llll �I'L I I � .� ��_�-I I ��s T�J'4- —��,_ I�t i�� .a '1 •I I ICI 111� "`-'I��. �fi 1�� --y,.�±--- — � ' ` IIIII ' '-I ;..Inns "�•i•_ L �._ '�^.�Y�'�'r �`•R4i'T' I�.' y i- ,! -'�y�� ±fi 1•' e, _ � I I'.I I � ...f'yK.-_r..��-+� - - _ = 1 I: . I i'; t 7 tit '� � �r��r�IlUll.l11111111 UII IIIfiIY!lF.J 1±1,1��I!III• '�1- «� r t� 3-y�. - .- - • t � rr K � ��%-�� --,•- - -- f 1 � i ANTypical Street Scene - Prototypical Product Rear Yard Typ. Patio Patio Patio Garage 1 ® Garage 1"� i r ' Slope -- --- ---- -- ------ -- --- -- -- -- 7�7 --T7-7--- L t I \1 L ' I Typical,Tree 32' Front Yard Parking and Sidewalk 9.5' P.U.E.. Pock t Both Sides of Street-IL r - ------ --- - ---- ----- (Homeowners1-- ' RarYard Responsibility) ' I ' Typical Building Plot PLANNING AREA F—Duet Detached Homes Conceptual Plan Information. The lot sizes are 42' x 84' �� J I I I \ \. and the target square footage is anticipated to be 1,400-2,600 �; Y I. J � . L S.F. Density is approximately 7.I homes per acre, and the site area is 10.2 acres. - / .Y X ,, \` ;/ Conceptual Site Plan _Q/V� i Densities will vary dependent on site and building criteria. 32 Final map may be subject to additional revisions. TT I i 1w �tr' 4 i- °2006 William Hezmalhalch Architects,Inc. Typical Street Scene— Prototypical Product 42' x 84' Lot Sizes Rear Yard Typ20' Garage ~ Garage 'o v r � a� m p :2 CO (N 5' 5' Garage Garage _.ry ' Porch Porch ' r F 20' 10, i'I 5'Sideway _ �' I r�L--^orb Parking Typ. Tree Pocket JPO Street Tree Typ. Small Canopy Tree Typ. Typical Plotting Diagram 36" Box 24" Box f II � Yr•,, '1 OPEN .SPACE / PARKS Public parks are incorporated throughout University Park, offering functional space for passive and active activities, as well as gathering spaces for surround- ing residents. Open space within all public parks will be dedicated to the city, and will be maintained by the city. Ranging in size from 2 to over 4 acres, the public parks include grassy hillsides, expansive flat turf areas, and canopy trees providing shade. Community facilities within the parks include basketball area, volleyball courts, children's play area, seating areas, and restroom facilities, (refer to figures 8 - 1 1). A dog park is planned at the corner of College Drive and University Park Drive and will feature separate areas for large and small dogs. Private open spaces provide additional green areas within each neighborhood at a smaller scale. Parcels A and B will include private recreation centers featur- ing pool and spa facilities. The pedestrian circulation system provides accessibil- ity to all the open space areas of University Paris A community garden area will be included within an open space retention basin or one public park at a location to be determined by city staff members. Electrical and Water sources as well as Fencing will be provided for the garden as recommended by city staff. 34 � I }III 1 OPEN LAWN PLAY AREA \ L 0 I I \ 1 � -RAMP BASEBALL BACKSTOP I / iX WALKING TRAIL RAMP I �+ TR PAWLION WITABLES - \ &BENCHES MONUMENT BKRI f TYP. LOCATIONJC T LO {FAR AGE 24,. _ J \ BAs Comm �`` \ C RT Co WATER SPRAY FEATURE I ter LOT FOR AGE T r� �9ENCN TYP \ MADE - j STRUCTUR!< TYP. AN MONUMENT SIG _• BENCH TYP. - /� ParkPALM � I cLusTEll I Key Map Figure 8—Park within Parcel "E"& T" 35 x � � �y DOG PARK FOR SMALL DOGS ` \ 3t ?' \ J TRASH IL Q RECEPTACLE PAVILION ` *" r TYP. _WI TABLES Q r \ PET WASTE BAG S BENCHES ' . TYP. TYP. } P Q � _SOIL CEMENT C �\ WALKING TRAIL/! 4 DRINKING FOUNTAIN REST AREA r FOR DOGS AND PEOPLE \ TYR r It �� '�+�+ DOG PARK FOR LARGE DOGS i 4 {I x BENCH TYP.--,,,, DOG PARKJ / o x 10 ENTRY GATES /4 < Ol t-' 1 ` RAMP FENCE Wi. �� i 4, —SIDEWALK i ANGLED PARKING . J All COBBLE 0 / I Figure 9—Dog Park Key Map 36 1 t MOUNDING_ BAy( TYR COURT • PAVILION Wt TABLES J o BENCHES T / 1 YP FOR A¢ES _ 2:1 ELOPE IMAL) / frtl LOT C.J _BENCH FORA 35-12 TYR / REBTROOM RETEWnM AREA IL MOUNDING LAWN! >/ TYP SHADE STRUCTURE M. T -r - 2• / / / 12%ACCESS RAMP— - AVILION Wl TABLES -.< a�•^' . B BENCHES IS TYR ANGLED MONUENT PALM CLUSTERTYR _ UNIVERSITY PARK DRIVE— BASK LL Figure I 0—Park within Parcel "B" RCN RETENTION AREA C l t. SAND l u OLLEYBAL WALKING PATH I / GIN R O 4 \ a COBBLE . TYP �Le �. ,y MOUNDIN ! TYR -- SHADE .. --A'SIDENtA —RESTROOM �\—STRUCTURE TYR Figure I I—Park within Parcels"C"&"D" 1 Key Map PORTOLA AVENUE LEGEND w Existing Streets 0 Improved Streets (Half R.O.W) p Proposed Streets O • Major Nodes Q UJ Minor Nodes LU > 0 PACIFIC AVENUE Q ry, LL v Oo Q-� QP co \J J� F CIRCULATION NETWORK OR/��/VO�OG Perimeter Circulation System— Cook Street. Serving as a major gateway from Interstate 10 to the City of Palm Desert, Cook Street forms the eastern boundary of the larger University Park parcel. Currently, Cook Street is partially improved on the eastern side with an ultimate right-of-way of 142 feet. The final improve- ments will include three travel lanes and an 8-foot wide bicycle lane for a total pavement width of 46 feet on each side. A 20-foot parkway contains an 8-foot meandering sidewalk on both sides of the roadway. A raised me- than with a width of 18 feet will be located in the center, (see Figure 13). COOK STREET All median plantings will meet City of Palm Desert lanscaping criteria. Figure 12—Circulation Plan 38 Gerald Ford Drive, Portola Avenue. Forming the northern boundary of the University Park parcel, Gerald Ford Drive will have an ultimate right-of-way of 150 feet. Each side of the center line will �. include three 12-foot travel ways and a 6-foot bike lane for a total paving width of 42 feet. In addition, 8-foot meandering sidewalks r will be provided within the right-of-way (see.Figure 14). Portola PROPOSED Avenue forming the western boundary, will have an ultimate right- ' R/W �- of-way of 138 feet, and the half street section will be identical to the Gerald Ford Drive half street section, with the exception that the meandering sidewalk will measure 6 feet, (see Figure 15). —12 12' ��' 14 Meandering Parking Travel Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Median Sidewalk 20' 46' 75' Figure 13—Typical Cross Section, Cook Street ,z C/L R/W� Ik - f i- 10' Min J�--B'� l'�' 12' 12' 12' Landscape Meandering Bike Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Median Easement Sidewalk 24' -�I' 42' 75' Figure 14—Typical Cross Section, Gerald Ford Drive 39 INTERNAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM- As a traditionally planned community, University Park will provide a hierarchy of streets that allows for multiple routes to each destination. College Drive is the major formative street, connecting all C L neighborhoods and provides pedestrians, bicyclists, and golf carts with access to the University, as well as Cook Street. College Drive, University Park Drive, and Pacific Avenue are designated R/W as themed boulevards serving local traffic within University Park. These streets feature a 76 foot- 108 foot right of way with a raised median in the center. A 6-foot bicycle/ golf cart lane will occur adjacent to,the drive aisle in each direction, and a parkway on each side will feature 6- �� foot sidewalks separated from the street by a 6-foot minimum land- 1�--6 12 12 12 scape area. These streets include expanded rights-of-way at intersections Meandering Bike Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Median Sidewalk to accommodate right turn lanes (see Figures 16-21). 24' 42' 75' Figure 15—Typical Cross Section, Portola Avenue Street section varies as Portola approaches Gerald Ford Drive. See approved street plans. y NORTH SOUTH R/W R/W 6' Min. -8' ---6' 12' 12 12' ---$'— -6' 6' Min. Landscape Sidewalk Parkway Bike Lane Travel Lane Median Travel Lane Bike Lane Parkway Sidewalk Landscape Easement Easement 76' Figure 16—Typical Cross Section, College Drive Station 10+62.00 to 64+00.00 (Residential Area) 40 Ye NORTH �. SOUTH R/W '� R/W 4' Min. ---R'— —6' 12' 12' 12' 4' Min. Landscape Sidewalk Parkway Bike Lane Travel Lane Median Travel Lane Bike Lane Parkway Sidewalk Landscape Easement Easement 76' Figure 17—Typical Cross Section, University Park Drive Station 10+57 to 35+96 (Residential Area) z NORTH j R/W •.� SOUTH ( R/W Varies Varies I I Varies '— —6' 12' 11.4'-23.4' 12'-30' --6'— —6'-12'-: ' Sidewalk Parkway Bike Lane Travel Lane Median Travel Lane Bike Lane Parkway Sidewalk 0' Figure 18—Typical Cross Section, Station 37+51 to 40+43 University Park Drive (Commercial-Mixed/Use Area Between College Drive& Cook Street) 41 h� WEST_ - _ EAST R/W R/W —R' L 12L12'-0•'l12' —8 —6' , 4 Min. Sidewalk Parkway Bike Lane Travel Lane Median Travel Lane Bike Lane Parkway Sidewalk 4 Min. Landscape Landscape Easement Easement 10, 8' Figure 19—Typical Cross Section, Station 20+50.00 to 22+81.81 Pacific Avenue � x CA r WEST_ _ EAST R/W ' R/W I I Varies Varies 4' Min. Varies —20'- 30' 20'- 30' 6--� Varies 4' Min. Landscape 6'- 18' Sidewalk Parkway Bike Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Bike Lane Parkway Sidewalk 6' - 18' Landscape Easement Easement 10 0 ' FIGURE 20—TYPICAL CROSS SECTION, Station 17+50.00 to 20+50.00 Pacific Avenue 42 t rr ; C WST i t r: EAST R/W !fit'' R i 4 Min. Skkwdk Parkway No Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane 9tke Lone Parkway SW,fwalk 4 Min. Landscape Faeernent Eamr ent rp G8. Figure 21—Typical Cross Section, Station 20+50.00 to 22+81.81 Pacific Avenue R/W 7 r '6= f8= 16 7' 7' t andscape Sidewalk Porkwoy travel Lane Neaian Travel Lane Parkway Sidewalk Landscape nrr� (raised) Area Figure 22—lypical Cross Section, Entry Street, Planning Areas C, D, E, & F • CA CA RJMf A[ ' R/w • R , Tree Tree Tree — Tree Pocket Pocket L Pocket Pocket Sidewc k* Perking Trb„b1 Lane Travel Lone Porking Sidewalk Sidewalk* Parking Trcvel Lore T-ovel lore Parking siderro k P.U,E- Right of Way P U_E_ P.0 E Right of Way Figure 24—Cross Section at tree pocket, Interior Street Figure 23—Cross Section at tree pocket, Street Adjacent to Park Local Residential Streets. Residential streets within University Park are designed in a modified grid pattern, and are narrowed to provide a pedestrian scaled experi- ence. All streets within the neighborhoods will be privately owned and maintained by a homeowners association. A public access easement will provide public access to the parks. Short street segments will be incorporated to reduce traffic speeds, and create a pedestrian friendly environment. Parking provided within each neighborhood exceeds minimum requirements established by the City. Parcels C, D, E & F will be ungated and allow public access while parcels A and B may be gated or ungated (see Figure 23-25). CA ' Entries to single family detached neighborhoods feature a 78-foot wide right of way in- I f eluding two 16-foot travel lanes, an 8-foot raised median, a 7-foot parkway and 5-foot Tree- I — sidewalk on each side. Each entry street terminates in a large public park (see Figure Pocket 22). Local streets in parcels C, D, E & F have a 33-foot right-of-way, including parking 411 �__61_4 . .._8. 2q and a 5-foot sidewalk on both sides. The right-of-way will expand to 37' in areas di- sid"alk Park mg Trovel Lone rectly adjacent to public parks. All street tree types and locations within neighborhoods must be approved b the City of Palm Desert. .U- 29'��P.U._ PP Y Y P.U_E. Right of Way P.:1_E_ Figure 25—Cross Section at tree pocket. Interior Street Option Parcels A & B Parcels Location Parking Condition R.O.W. Width Street Width Sidewalk Width Public Utility Easements(P.U.E.) Ownership Figure Entry street from major collectors 5' Both sides C, D, E& F to S.F.D. neighborhood No Park non-curb adjacent Par-king 78'** 16' Each Lane None Private 22 ' C, D, E& F Adjacent to public park Parking Both Sides 37'** 36' 5' Both Sides 9.5' Private 23 A, B, C, D, E, F Not adjacent to public parks Parking Both Sides 33'** 32' 5' Both Sides 9.5' Private 24 A& B Not adjacent to public parks Parking I Side 29'** 28' 5' One Side 8' Min. Private 25 Figure 26—Local Residential Street Standards Sections represent condition where tree pocket occurs on both sides of street. as Typical sidewalk location is adjacent to curb, and typical width is 5' Bock of curb to back of curb TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES— '� Street safety and traffic speed reduction is the primary function of street ,r calming. Several strategies and techniques are used to adjust the flow of traffic to levels compatible with residential neighborhoods.The reduction 0.{ of speed and traffic noise achieved through traffic calming devices creates a. safer, more liveable neighborhood in which to walk, bike, and drive. Themed Boulevards. College Drive, Pacific Avenue, and y 'r1 1=0 ' �0 'elk University Park Drive feature roundabouts at busy nodes to reduce speeds ,l r and enhance traffic flows. Raised landscape medians separate travel lanes within these roadways, incorporating landscaping that brings texture and ty ♦ SI DEWAL shade to the street, reducing the perceived scale, and buffering traffic noise." .�• GROUND SIDEWALKS'AND PATHWAYS- TYP. .:_ MONUMENT SIG - One of the major goals of the University Park community is to reduce —__. LARGE CANOPY TREES- dependence on the automobile.To accomplish this, an extensive pedestn6,n circulation system provides convenient access to all community elements SMALL TREES and accommodates bicycles, golf carts and pedestrians. Sidewalks and pedes- trian pathways include meandering 6 to 8-foot sidewalks along the themed '�•` boulevards, and 4 to S-foot sidewalks along residential streets. A series of striped Class II pathways for bicycles and golf carts will be included along ma- jor boulevards. Final improvements shall be based'upon the design standards COBBLE TYP �.7. contained in the Circulation Element of the Palm Desert General Plan. PALM CLUSTE AC SHRUBS W/ BOULDERS - MONUMENT SIGN f Figure 27—Roundabout 45 r Plan View a G MONUMENTATION Serving as a major unifying element,the theme walls and monumentation for University Park reflect the +' Precast Concrete high level of design integrity found throughout the community. Monumentation elements are planned Ledge Stone to be understated in character and will occur at the major circulatory nodes (refer to figure I I). A smaller, pedestrian oriented version of the monuments will be located at the minor nodes. Individual planning areas - will utilize temporary signage which will ultimately n -- be removed so that community identification monu- ments will reinforce the.sense of connectivity and integration of all neighborhoods. Figure 28—Entry Monumentation 46 Y. },%w` f t V .I LANDSCAPE THETHEME The landscape design of University Park reflects the sense of com- accent plantings, providing visual exclamation points in the commu- munity inherent in the great small towns of America, while honoring pity. The use of Palms is also reflective of the native Fan Palms found its setting in the heart of the Coachella Valley. Tree lined streets, in oasis throughout the Coachella Valley. distinctive parks, and the provision of meaningful shade create a pedestrian scaled environment that is memorable and enjoyed by all. APPLICABILITY This document does not supercede city ordinances & policies. All PLANT PALETTE plans for individual parcels will be subject to review by the city. Plans One of the goals of University Park is to integrate environmentally prepared by project landscape architect and civil engineer must be responsible practices, and the use of water efficient "native" species consistent. All landscape plans must comply with the following: is of primary concern. Keeping with this philosophy, the plant palette - City of Palm Desert low water ordinance focuses on lower maintenance plant species. A modified naturalistic - Parking lot tree / shade ordinance plant palette is envisioned incorporating some standard native spe- - Line-of-sight requirements cies along with hybridized cultivars to bring to light the best of the - Current I.S.A. &Anzi guidelines species, without many of the inherent drawbacks. Canopy trees give - City of Palm Desert maintenance guide shade and structure to the landscape while Palms serve as vertical - City of Palm Desert plant palette guide 47 SI(�- ''fir'-� A T d � +• v _ti 1 n 1 _ - t r* • tA •..� 7TTTNbb9 ' 1�1 al UZI, �y' ;�• .� � +r�, if � .•,._w,. r. � ��rr� bra a �,— ''' ,� :V+�. �r, 14�t• 7 • Y Js ` �fe��_',ram. "••-,�" � -i; '� ,i 'aLY'. Ruellia - �� ,.entury Piant � •. �� , Desert Spoon ucco Large Trees Large Shrubs Botanical Name Common Name Bougainvillea'La Jolla' Bougainvillea Leucophyllum candidum 'thun-'Thunder cloud'tm Acacia smallii Sweet Acacia, Cassia artemisiodes Feathery cassia Muhlenbergia lindheimeri 'Autumn glow'tm Cercidium hybrid 'desert Desert museum palo verde Caesalpinia gillesL Mexican bird of paradise Muhlenbergia capillaris'regal 'Regal mist'tm Tipuana tipu Tipu tree Caesalpinia pulcherrima Red bird of paradise Muhlenbergia dumosa Bamboo muhly Dalea pulchra Indigo brush Ruellia peninsularis Ruellia Small Trees Fouquieria splendens Ocotillo Stipa tenuissima Mexican feather grass Acacia stenophylla Shoestring Acacia Leucophyllum frutescens 'Green cloud'tm Cesalpinia cacalaco Cascalote Small Shrubs Chilopsis linearis lucretia Desert Willow Medium Shrubs Chrysothamnus nauseosus Rabbitbrush Pithecellobium flexicaule Texas ebony Bougainvillea'ooh la la' Bougainvillea Dyssodia pentachaeta Golden fleece Vitex agnus-casus Chaste tree Eremophila maculata'valentine'Valentine Encelia farinosa Brittle brush Eremophila maculata'winter Emu Bush Ruellia'katii' Ruellia Palms Justica califomica'julie' Chuparosa Ruellia brittoniana'rosa' Pink dwarf ruellia Washingtonia filifera hybrid California fan palm hybrid Leucophyllum laevigatum Chihuahuan gage Salvia greggii Sage Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm Leucophyllum langmaniae 'rio 'Rio bravo'tm 48 v ' Sh Ilk � <: ._ k S�,veet Acacia ' � � - •t 7t Bougainvillea Desert Museum Palo Verde R Acacia Desert Carpet Chihuunuan Sage Desert Willow Accent Shrubs Espalier/Vines Boulders Agave americana Century plant Merremia aurea Yellow morning glory vine Cresta roja from Southwest Boulder and Stone Agave geminiflora Agave Vitis califomica'rogers red' California grape Agave vilmoriniana Octopus agave Cobble Aloe vera (barbadensis) Medicinal aloe Groundcover Salt river cobble- 12"minus Dasylirion longissimum Mexican grass tree Acacia r. 'desert carpet' Trailing acacia Dasylirion wheeleri Desert spoon Carissa g. 'green carpet' Natal Plum Decomposed Granite Echinocactus grusonii Golden barrel cactus Dalea capitata Sierra Gold Dalea Desert sunset decomposed granite 3/8"minus with I I Hesperaloe parviflora Red yucca Lantana montevidensis Purple Pros.Lantana fines-2"depth, place in all planting areas unless otherwise noted Hesperaloe parviflora'yellow' Yellow yucca Lantana montevidensis'new Spreading yellow lantana Apache brown 1/4" minus, 1 1/2"thick layer,stabilized Nolina microcarpa Bear grass Lantana m.'spreading sunshine'Yellow prostrate lantana Desert gold gravel 3/4" minux, 1 1/2"thick layer,stabilized Nolina parryi' Dwarf rr�exican grass tree Plumbago scandens 'summer Plurbago Opuntia basilaris Beavertail cactus Rhus trilobata'autumn amber Prostrate sumac , Opuntia sp. 'santa rita' Purple opuntia Turf Yucca baccata Blue yucca Yucca rigida Yucca 49 it '� •� - �•� r ;r'� = ca• - It,• �� '+ - • � ,.'s • '� s-_ �. .• ^DIY • �' y j � •1; • �' � �.. '��' -*� •� � `' •� ♦ �"•� •r "' ",,• �� a �� _ 1 . 7 1�y•1 y<. _ DESERT GOLD GRAVEL —SALT RIVER COBBLE DECOMPOSED GRANITE- APACHE BROWN GERALD FORD DRIVE DG -- -SIDEWALK MONUMENT -- -- - --- SIGN 1i _ • GO COBBLE P. ION N RETENTION BASIN Figure 29—Gerald Ford Drive Entry Area Planting • t` + - `� PERIMETER STREETS AND THEMED LIGHTING BOULEVARDS All lighting will need to be approved by the City of Palm Creating the first impression of the community, design Desert and adhere to the dark sky ordinance. Bollard treatments of the perimeter streets of University Park have fixtures will provide pathway lighting in the park areas. been given special attention. Gerald Ford Drive incorporates Along major street frontages, no formal street lighting is low-level plantings along with larger scale trees and shrubs. included. Large-scale trees for this use are Sweet Acacia, Desert Museum Palo Verde and Chaste tree. Smaller scale accents ART IN PUBLIC PLACES will be Texas Ebony and Cascalote with groves of Shoestring The type of art and location will be coordinated with the Acacia providing vertical interest. This theme carries through City's Public Art Manager. to University Park Drive with Tipu trees proposed in the cen- At ter median along with small-scale accents of Desert Willow Lucretia Hamilton and Texas Ebony. Varied Palm clusters of Key Map accent roundabouts, while cobble and low-level shrubs and groundcovers are included to maintain sight lines. si � t or ——� Hesperaloe Porvlflora Caesolpprnio Cocalaco thec. Fouquena-Splendons "Yellow" Flexicoule Leucophyllum F "Green Cloud" Doleo Pulchro I 1 I Encelio Fannoso DO SMALL TREES / ;—SALT RIVER COBBLE TYP. - _DECOMPOSED GRANITE- --DESERT GOLD GRAVEL Or APACHE BROWN ' ��. �� ^f � _\ \,�* .. � •.`�••�� •. Y'/ J _'—�-+-,;� �i, _..ram .I F-'s- �- j fi f Justica Califom M SHRUBSico SMALL ACCENT SHRUBS LARGE SHRUBS �{ 'Julie" GERALD FORD DRIVE a J Eremophila M. SIDEWALK —BOULDER TYP. "Valentine" 4'�•. w- 0 m* e: y qoqppr— <c't Figure 30 ypical Interior Parkway and edian Island Planting • •a _ z Calliandro Cali fornica P or 1�rc•� - ,1II•.Lantana Montevidensis Leucophyllum "Thunder Cloud" Acauu Sm,ollii `~ n CeradiUrn Hybrid "Desert Museurn" P, Key Map 52 � W \ \\ � .. 1 COBBLE y TYR r. \ ` r aN- or / i ® Chitalpo Toshkentensus Chilopsis Lineoris ,G► SIDEWAL "Pink Dawn" Lucretia Hamilton . } Tipuonno Tipu v •tA,¢ CONCRETE WALKING PATH Washington Robusto - .AwS ;. r-' Cassia Artemisiodes f 53 Figure 3 1—Residential Entry Area Planting, C, D, E&F /! SLOPE TREATMENTS NEIGHBORHOOD LANDSCAPING Slopes present a challenge when drip irrigation is used because Each neighborhood in University Park has been designed they are subject to runoff erosion and maintenance access to have a unique identity through a street tree theme that 4`-0" �•U.E. Limit difficulty. To minimize potential problems, watering rings to expresses individuality while being compatible with the com- control runoff will surround all shrubs,trees and groundcov- munity landscape palette. Front yard plantings may incorporate 5'-6" ers installed on slopes. Additionally, planting areas for canopy some lawn if the area is large enough to be considered usable trees will be created by placement of boulders, which will be space. Unusable "token" lawn areas will not be included. 5'-01. - Back of Curb extended into the adjacent slopes for continuity. Groundcover Mounding provides interest in the front yards where appropri- shrubs with potential slope holding capabilities have been in- ate, incorporating boulders, shrub and ground cover plantings cluded to minimize erosion, and care has been taken to layout that mimic perimeter areas. Street tree pockets will be includ- 13'-0" Face of Curb plant materials so they can grow to their full size with minimal ed in the sidewalk of every other lot, and along the perimeter pruning, of public parks (see figure 32). Overall,the landscape concept Figure 32—Tree Pocket Detail for the individual neighborhoods reflect community cohesive- ness while having a subtle identity of their own. q o r: COBBLE I F. _ —SMALL TREES --- 4` HT. BOTTOM RETAINING WALL ACCENT SHRUBS ----- - y WI BOULDERS 4` SWALE —6 SIDEWALK J — _ _ _ _ r ► io rk � - 6F �.. • Fig.R Park IS P Key Map Figure 33—Typical Interior Parkway and Median Island Planting 6'MAX. TOP RETAINING WALL 54 l r - - �I I � Lantana "New Gold" Yucca Boccato Agave geminifloro Bougainville "La Jolla" Cassia Artemisiodes Washington Robusta i Agave Americana Agave Vilmoriniono I` O or Washington Fili fera '. t Irv• SIDEWAL J Hybrid Leucophyllum F. Leucophyllum C. TYPUNDCO "Green Cloud" Thunder Cloud ' —MONUMENT SIG +... LARGE CANOPY TREE SMA TREES- Qk or P _ COBBLE' P. 4. i PALM CLUSTE�r ACC SHRUBS i W/BOULDERS MONt�MENTSIGN ® e —_ Chitalpo Tashkentensu Ul,,upsis Lineoris "Pink Dawn" Lucretia Hamilton Lantana Montevidensis VP -�' it* or J Justice Colifomico `Julie" rinuonnn Tipu 4 Lremophilo M. Figure 34—Typical Round-a-bou "Valentine" Al o, or Prosopis Ganduloso "Movnck" Acacia Smollii Key Map Cercidium Hybrid Coesalppinio Cocoloco Pithecellobium Flexicoule 55 "Desert Musteum" ARCHITEC URE i r�+ i architecture A high level of design quality is the primary goal for the architecture at University Park. Authenticity of style is the key to achieving this goal, and an accurate interpretation of the characteristics of each style is important. Ironically, simple massing and roof forms often lead to the most authentic expression of a style. This "simple house" concept starts with simple structural forms then adds interest in the roof forms, pitches, and elevational massing that are called for by expression of a selected style. The result is a home that achieves architectural authenticity while maintaining acceptable building costs. THE STYLES— Architectural diversity is encouraged at University Park, and will be achieved through the inclusion of a variety of styles. Achievement of design quality, integrity, and appropriateness is the comprehensive objective for the community. All architecture styles for University Park have been selected for their compatibility with the desert. 57 •� .' � ,�A � per[.'►• �►� , _ :� / .r�r � _/ x ' r • 'k• - .d� .� .` t .� �°� �'j 4t''�S''crr'r �- :a-�. - t •c! �C/a.. '�/-'t°' '/ �`" te�y..I I jj +� �-•' ;� . ��. *, •; �' v >>�� .;tea, � _ Ste'+ !�+ .,y ,�,+kL� Y•i} � Iw I. � i 71►a. �- ` 44, ��, •, � _ + ,,.fit „ lit a ! Apt FIR '+ice° ,L,�, .i,•. L .{� T J� Y'�w � s ;1 ,two• _-�. ---- � "T- _ *M. - 4i f a ' - — mm - - } r PIT" IL tuSCan The rustic hillside villas and farmhouses of Northern Italy provide the inspiration for this style. Tuscan homes are geared toward entertaining friends and family and are built to accommodate, both intimate gatherings and extraordinary feasts. Vertical window openings and tower elements combined with rich, warm colors, abundant stonework, and rustic wood trim are common elements of Tuscan architecture. 59 i A.► f�`•;��ice: `•� T-'. '�r_i. \.'�- � , A jF • fir.'�. �� ; � ��. � �'. •1 ��" ��." I�- r•' mil. jw R 31 • (' 1 I •••. r♦. w R. ' u.M6.,- AM '��<•.�' is .t '`�! ��. i)' s' _ -. -V�:r - n` r .t. •i� 'Ili L " "f , 'I - �j'F3i-.r'►PFT ��". /� Wt �. _ 1■ 4�'9f tidies 3+ I•r'+�' �_ �.•��^� i�/�( - `.�+L��. a ;i_-�', - �1 ,� :,+ •. hr .Ml �.� _ .a � 'fir •� � � _____- .dam► 1�..._ � � , `� R Y J. • .t _t y�1 !r. / ✓' _ _ �. earn 1I. f_ -Tye•T�rK^n +� kv JI � t ��*' .,,;i •ram.-"- ��,��,�,,: �' � - i � 'aF•1'�j�" r� `A � `fir ~^�•�~ � ,' •��`� _ - �";;-i1- - - _ '- _ -. .. - G r' �• Y .,oi�• T i -==acts spanish monterey This style introduced two story residential construction to California with a combination of Spanish Colonial adobe construction methods and a New England colonial house. First built in 1835 by Thomas Larkin, a second story cantilevered balcony is the distinctive element of this style. s y ♦ stir vet U+•r -' - 'r' �R\�r� �11ts / J s- ♦-3" r �w N, j1r of � s_(;srf 'tom• • ` 1 f - OW, owl w spanlsh Colonial / santa barbara Characterized by elegance and simplicity, this style is rooted in the early Spanish missions, and was later adapted to the American Southwest. The style achieved widespread popularity after its use in the Panama-California Exposition of 1915. Graceful archways and courtyards are common features, along with wrought iron embellishments. ' de f ; 404. ia- 71 r r y,y yyy I t i 1 • d sr47._ `K Ars Ile �:f ralrt• y F�.s{•L 'i' . i +. :r.s •iq.r r y k � �� - mew t, 31 r' r n Ajbb r� i .. � IR 1 �''► _ # C� rifi'' �, �' _ fir �"` 4. -. .� "�+ ��'�3,,'��,s"'!` �_. • � J`_ �p'i �' fir.• � .. .r ' 1 L desert prairie First introduced in the late 1800s, Prairie style architecture is primarily inspired by the forces of nature. Popularized by the work of Frank Lloyd Wright, the style spread throughout the country in the early 1900s. The style is well suited to the American southwest. Its broad horizontal forms reflect the expansiveness of the desert, while deep roof overhangs provide relief from the harsh sun. D GRIT ERI A . , e i� l�1 A. a �f r' 1 4 I� r lY > R - DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA PURPOSE The purpose of the development criteria is to ensure that University Severability. If there is a conflict between the development PLANNING DESCRIPTION GROSS Park reflects the guiding principles of traditional design to enhance plan and the conditions of approval, the development plan will AREA ACREAGE the livability of the overall community. This section provides criteria prevail. In the event that any regulation, condition, program, portion, A Medium Density 1 1.5 ac for builders to follow for the design of individual parcels, and will or policy of this Master Development Plan or the application thereof B Medium Density 22.9 ac establish minimum standards for the PCD overlay zone. Further, it to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid or unconstitu- C Medium Density 24.8 ac will provide more opportunities for the applicant to enhance creativ- tional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be D Medium Density 20.9 ac ity and reduce neighborhood monotony. deemed separate, distinct, and independent provisions and shall not E Medium Density 24.8 ac affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Master Devel- F Medium Density 10.2 ac Actions deemed to be consistent with the Master Development opment Plan, or applications thereof which can be implemented Approved tentative Plan shall be judged to be consistent with the City of Palm Desert without the invalid provision or application. tract map 32655 Low Density 73.8 ac General Plan as mandated in the California Government Code, Sec- TOTAL 188.9 ac tion 65454. Should the regulations contained herein differ from the Review and Approval Process. When development of a regulations of the City of Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance,the regula- specific planning area is proposed, an application for approval of a Residential — Medium Density. The Medium Density Residential tions of the Master Development Plan shall take precedence. Unless Tentative Tract Map shall be filed with and shall be approved by the Land Use Designation is intended to provide for the development otherwise specified herein,terms used in this document shall have Planning Commission. In addition,the merchant builder subsequently of a range of product types with a density of 4-10 dwelling units per the same definitions as provided in the City of Palm Desert Zoning will submit for architectural review of the proposed product. A acre. The intent is to accommodate a variety of product types and Ordinance Chapter 25.04, "Definitions." Tentative Tract Map may cover one or more planning areas of the styles that appeal to a range of market segments. The development project. If a Tentative Tract Map is proposed for an area less than standards allow a variety of densities and styles yet maintain the Compliance With General Plan. The project as a whole will a complete planning area, a schematic land use plan for the entire overall limits on the total number of dwelling units. be compatible with surrounding land uses and consistent with the planning area shall be submitted. That schematic land use plan shall land use policies of the City of Palm Desert's General Plan. show that the partial development of the entire planning area will Residential — Low Density. The low density land use designation not inhibit the overall development of the planning area. is intended to provide for the development of single-family detached The General Plan goals and policies for the proposed University Park homes with a density range of 1-4 dwelling units per acre.The previ- project area are included in the greater University Park Planning Area Density calculations are based upon the gross area of each planning ously approved Tentative Tract Map 32655 falls within this category. description (2,075 acres) and include four land use designations, area. The gross area is defined as the net planning area acreage plus Low Density Residential (R-L), Medium Density Residential (R-M), the acreage of land dedications adjacent to each planning area. For High Density Overlay (HDO), and Open Space/ Public Parks (OS/PP). density calculations only, the gross acreage for each planning area The entire range of housing proposed in this Master Development shall be allocated as follows: Plan shall be included in the R-M and R-L designation. 67 a DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Parcels A, B—Motor Court: Detached & Attached Parcel B—Triplex: Attached Parcels C, D, E, & F—Single Family: Detached Requirement Minimum Requirement Minimum Requirement Minimum Average Lot Size N/A Average Lot Size N/A Average Lot Size 3,500 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Size N/A Min. Lot Size N/A Minimum Lot Size 3,000 sq. ft. Lot Coverage 50% Lot Coverage 50% Lot Coverage 50% Front Yard Setbacks (minimum from back of sidewalk Front Setbacks (minimum from back of sidewalk Front Yard Setbacks (from back of sidewalk) or back of curb if there is no sidewalk) or back of curb if there is no sidewalk) - Main Living Area (ground floor) 15' (20' from curb - Main Living Area (ground floor) 10, - Main Living Area (ground floor) 10, where tree pocket - Porch / Balcony 6' - Porch / Balcony 6' occurs) - Garden Wall (maximum 18" height) 4.5' - Garden Wall 3' - Porch / Balcony 10, - Second Floor Living Space Offset from 2' Rear Setbacks - Garden Wall 4.5' Face of Garage (may be recessed - Second Floor Living Space - Garage (front access) 20' or cantilevered) Offset from Face of Garage - Garage (side-in access) 10, - Garage (front access) 20' (may be recessed or cantilevered) 2' Rear Yard Setback - Driveway Length 3' - Garage to Alley Edge 3' - Living Area 20' Rear Yard Setbacks Side Setbacks - Garage (deeply recessed) 15'* - Living Area, Garage to Fence Line 10, - Living Area 10, Side Yard Setback Side Yard Setbacks - Maximum Encroachment into Sideyard Setback - Interior living area (first and second story) 5' - Living Area, Garage to Fence Line 5' (pot shelf, bay windoyv) 2.5' - Corner/ Street 10, - Max. Encroachment into Side Yard Setback (Maintain 3' clear) - Garage 0'** (pot shelf or bay window) 2.5' Building Separation Perimeter Setback (maintain 3' clear) - Porch / Balcony to Porch / Balcony 12' - Living Area (I or 2 stories) 20' Perimeter Setback - Front to Front 20, Building Height I Story 18'*** - Living Area (I or 2 stories) 20' - Rear to Rear 26' 2 Stories 24'*** Building Separation - Garage Face to Garage Face 30' Accessory Structure Height 24' - Side to,Side 10, - Side to Side 10, - Rear to Rear (living space) 20, Perimeter Setback Second Story Windows Facing Sideyards No minimum height - Rear to Side 15' - Living Area (I or 2 stories) 20' of Single Family Homes - Garage Face to Garage Face 30' Building Height I Story 18'*** from floor Building Height I Story 18'*** 2 Stories 24'*** 2 Stories 24'*** Private Open Space (patio) 60 sq. ft. with a minimum Private Open Space 200 sq. ft. Private Open Space dimension of 6' (Side or Rear Yard) 200 sq.ft. Rear setbacks of 0' for garages and accessory structures may be permitted as an exception. Area F lots may incorporate a sideyard reciprocal use easement- side setbacks to be measured from easement. Height limit may be increased through the exceptions process to improve function, enhance aesthetics, and provide variety along the streetscape. Approval will be required by the Architectural Review Committee, Planning Commission, and 68 City Council. Approved Tentative Tract Map 32655— Energy Conservation Plan—Planning Commission Single Family: Detached Resolution No. 2385 Average Lot Size 8,000 sq. ft. All parcels within the Master Development Plan shall conform with Minimum Lot Size 7,200 sq. ft. the City of Palm Desert's Energy Conservation Plan requiring new (Per conditions of approval, 18 lots homes to exceed Title 24 standards and comply with the updated may be under 7,200 sq.ft.) energy requirements established by the City Office of Energy Lot Coverage 45% Management. Front Setbacks (minimum from back of curb) - Main Living Area 20' In addition, developers of homes within the Master Development Plan - Porch / Balcony 10, are required to install photovoltaic panels on the roof of the model - Garden Wall 4.5' units. The homes will be designed so as to accommodate solar panels - Second Floor Living Space Offset from 2' and to maximize appropriate roof orientation for the solar panels. A Face of Garage (may be recessed condition will require that all units be wired to accept the panels. The or cantilevered) panels will then be marketed to purchasers of homes as an option. - Garage (front access) 20' - Garage (side-in access) 15' Rear Yard Setbacks - Living Area 20' - Garage (deeply recessed) 15' Side Yard Setbacks - Interior 5' - Corner/Street 10, Perimeter Setback - Living Area (I or 2 stories) 20' Building Height I Story 18'*** 2 Stories 24'*** Accessory Structure Height 24' Parking r A. Single family and multifamily residential uses shall provide two covered (within a garage or carport) spaces per dwelling unit. Exceptions: The standards and guidelines presented in this section provide minimum design criteria for the achievement of functional and attractive developments that fit within the context of the City of Palm Desert. Exceptions to the criteria contained within the Development Plan may be appropriate with the application of innovative and unique design techniques in keeping with the character envisioned at the time of approval. 69 z - n Bob Hope Dr. o c - � � a cT o 0 Monterey Ave. C z D \ D m Portoli Ave. m _...I m D � I COOK St.