Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout106C DENNINGTON— ty I. y c i i • I N - f UAll ! D i H 1 G H WAY 111 PAIi L AND5APING PL A AJ SURVEYING 01,INC. I4LM E 59 M%Gw w.FV 92I '---��� DC4L, i. 92iG0 '14 -54 G4-09t5 ",go ipTY W KPARTMENT a NY'ROMMENTA` URYICES EXHISIT No CASE 1l'- ov PFR21P/29/v i�Vln. 7? ?9# rf�IL'h. P _ I. Y..�i. PU�LO/n.'G AD/'.Zc'�s 13-394 HwY Ili ZONE CUT i� 'PfiLi+9A //[CA6E _-.N/T IJG. // MS 2�/x CO., INC. TMIN LAND5CAPING �: `' = - EVATtONS 5URVEYtNG �� ,O° M 1 6 M w A Y i l l PtoiscT PROP05ED OFFICE 6UILDINC3 O PALM DESERT CALIF. / 92240 (q-1 5URIGY!NO CO, -W'C6) ' 714- D4f.�ODjS _ F:'2: MU[ tMQS JE22Y 09NN4N470- S1.'o•oi3i - i Ty-.:. N+dY 1:1, PAtM 7ES6RT oP �O{N CP MI1RM 1+v14-IO!-l$ OT NOT ,.. _..._.__.._ - A-1 SURVEYING CO., INC. 73.400 Hwy. 111, Suite 101 PALM DESERT, CA 92260 A-1 Surveying Co., Inc. 73-400 Highway 111, Suite 101 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Attention: Jerry Dennington cipeT ri Acc KAAii A-1 SURVEYING CO., INC. 73 400 Hwy. 111, Suite 101 PALM DESERT. CA 92260 Air. & Mrs. Jerry Dennington 7880 Whitegate Riverside, Ca. 92506 FIRCT rl AQC MAII k ():ff nz�names-L �f 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT REPORT ON: Commercial structure CASE NO.: 106 C 06-M Date: 1/26/79 LOCATION: North side of Highway 111, west of Las Palmas APPLICANT: JERRY DENNINGMN NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary site, floor and elevations DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB Continued this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: 1/23/79 Motion Made By: Jackson Seconded By: Barton Vote:' 1 ( ckson, Johnson• Crm as Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (Z5) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: 1. See enclosed Minutes. 2. Case continued, and will be rescheduled for Design Review once revised plans have been submitted. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE January 23. 1979 CASE NO.: 106 C APPLICANT: Jerry Dennington LOCATION: North side of Highway 111, west of Las Palmas ZONING C-1. S.P. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Parkin -- Based on the proposed size of the structure, approximately 2685 sq. ft., 11 parking spaces are required. The applicant has indicated that 11 spaces are provided, but realistically in light of vehicular maneuverability requirements, only eight are functional. Further study is apparent with regard to the parking area also in terms of Ordinance requirements for 4 foot strips of landscaping to serve as buffers between the parking area and property lines. Front Elevations -- The design of the fire walls and resultant effect on the front elevations is dependent upon the existing structures on both sides. Additional information ought to be provided to the Board regarding the present situation to the east and west of the proposed structure to assist the Board in a determina- tion as to whether the proposed fire walls are most appropriate. Signs -- A sign program ought to be considered as part of the preliminary package, as there may be little flexibility in the location of signs once the front elevation has been established. f r C Minutes Page 2 Palm Desert Design Review Board Meeting January 23, 1979 _ III. CASES - - Case No. 106 C - JERRY DENNINGION - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a cmmiercial structure to be located on the north side of Highway 111, west of Las Palmas. Applicant was present. The Board discussed the parking lot design, noting that three of the required eleven spaces were not functional and observed that the minimum required width of 4' for landscape planters had not been provided. The Board also reviewed building elevations and found that arch detail and roof line/fire wall interface needed additional study. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Barton, the Board continued the case to allow the applicant to evaluate alternative designs for the parking lot and building front elevation; ca-ried 4-0 (Johnson, Jackson, Barton, Crump). *** Board manber Bernie Leung entered the meeting at 2:45 p.m. *** Case No. 59 C - CHARLES MARTIN - Revised preliminary and final construction drawings for a ccmnercial structure 10cated on the south side of Highway 111, east of panorama. Applicant was present. The Board reviewed the revised plans with the applicant. Discussion centered on the need to provide landscaped areas and a determination of how it might be accomplished. The technical revisions to the plans were presented by the applicant. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the revised plans, subject to the following revisions: 1. That planter areas (and landscape material) be provided in the rear parking area as generally indicated on the site plan on file in the Department of Environmental Services. 2. That the applicant study methods to incorporate landscaping in the front of the building. 3. That a landscape plan addressing front and rear area be submitted to the Board for approval. Carried 4-0 (Johnson, Jackson, Barton, Leung). Case No. 163 MF - HUMM W. HfASFR - Final construction drawings for the conversion of existing residence to a duplex, located on the southeast corner of San Pasqual and Santa Rose. Applicant was not present. The Board reviewed the plans, noting design and submittal deficiencies. Building Director Hill, at the Study Session, advised the Board that new energy conservation requirenents would, from an economic standpoint, materially affect the conversion. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Barton, the Board rejected the case, citing the following: 1. The plans submitted are not accurately scaled as required. 2. The proposed parking is unrealistic in light of maneuverability requirements for vehicles. 3. The applicant has not submitted color and material samples as required as part of submittal of plans to the Department. Carried 3-0-1 (AYES: Johnson, Jackson, Barton; ABSTAIN: Leung). 2POOMR9 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION d nPnnington and Helen Denningt On Applicant ( Pleeee wint) (7141 780-0444 _ 90 WHitAgate Mailing Address Telephone Riverside, as 92506 City State Zip -Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) Office Building for Surveying and engineering company and other professional usp. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 16, Palma Village Unit No. 11, Map Book 21, page 96 73-394 Highway 111 ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. 627-092-032 EXISTING ZONING C-1 Property Owner Authorize tl9p.� THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR - ! FOR THEE FJ.LMG OF THIS Ap$LICAT14�ke i 3; 7 DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGN EON THIS AG MENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- INS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. 100 SIGNATAKE Applicants Signature SIGNA E DA E (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACCEPTED BY ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CASE No. /oL �- ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER REFERENCE CASE NO. J CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review of: Office Jerry CASE NO. Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi- ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap- proval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan- oarft\and all requirements of the City Engineer. ( t Department of Environmental Services Form 1 FM The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. FENCES,POOLS 6 DEPARTMENT DESIGN ( PLANNING APPLICATION OF ENVIRON- REVIEW (—\ COMMISSION MENTAL BOARD (APPROVES OR 77 SERVICES (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT) STAFF INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS PROCESSING SCHEDULE: DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND (�CONSTRUCI SAFETY L ION SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check.. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. STAFF -USE ONLY: Date Received Date of ACTOR Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED Staff ORB P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 DRgT,GN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS 1 ncguired Submittal Detail NOTE: Applications will not be processed until the application and all required materials are found to be complete. INITIAL PLAN REVIEW I. APPLICATION FORM: One (1) copy. Fill out completely and secure all signatures. Attach a sheet listing parties directly involved in representing the project (such as architect, engineer, etc.) and their addresses and tele- phone numbers. II. LABELS FOR PROJECT (Application) SPONSORS: One (1) set of gummed address labels shall be typed and submitted with the name and address of all persons to whom the Planning Commission action is to be sent (owner, architect, engineer, etc.). NOT required for a single-family residence on an individual —lot, or staff approval of signs. III. DETAILED PLOT PLAN: A. Items to be reviewed and approved by the'Design Review Board and Planning Commission require the plot plan submittal described below. 1. Three (3) full size plans completely dimensioned and at a scale not smaller than 1 inch = 40 feet, showing the following data: - Scale - North arrow - Property lines - Lot dimensions - Public rights -of -way with existing and proposed dimensions (include street names) - Existing or proposed curb lines - Any and all easements - All utility line locations (gas, electric, cable, water, and sewer) - Adjacent property uses (showing approximate loca- tion of structures and other pertinent features) - Major vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access points to and from site (use arrows of different widths to show direction and intensity of use) - Setback areas - All existing and proposed structures - Interior vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian circula- tion patterns (if applicable) - Off-street parking (to include spaces, regulatory devices, provisions for accessory vehicle storage where applicable, etc.) - Parking areas for bicycles and carts (if applicable) - Service areas and facilities to include: 1) trash storage areas 2) mail delivery boxes 3) loading areas DRB Process Page Two III. DETAILED PLOT PLAN: (Cont.) A. 1. (Cont.) - Perimeter fencing and screening - Proposed sign locations (if applicable) - Project phasing, showing the stages of construc- tion for the entire development - One (1) copy of the plot plan multi -colored in- dicating open space/landscaping, buildings, park- ing, and driveways. Where more than one height of building is proposed, show each in a different color. DO NOT MOUNT THIS COPY ON A BOARD. 2. One (1) copy of the plot plan containing all of the general information described above, except that it is to be drafted or photographically reduced to an 8i"xll" or 13" size sheet. (All lettering to be legible; include graphic scale). B. Items to be reviewed and approved by Planning Division Staff only require three (3) full size copies of the plot plan described above. (i.e. single-family dwelling and signs valued under $1,000.) IV. INFORMATION SHEET AND/OR PLAN BLOCK: As appropriate, include an attached sheet to the application and/or specify directly on the plans, in an information block, the following data: - Owner's name, address, and phone number - Designer's name, address, and phone number - Any special information or conditions pertaining to the site or to the plans - Acreage and square footage calcualations - Ratio of structures to total land area - Ratio of parking spaces to building square footage - Parking requirements provided - Ratio of landscaping to total land area - Any specific information of special conditions particularly relevant to the project V. SITE ANALYSIS & PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN: Three (3) copies of a plan indicating the data described below (in- formation may be incorporated into the plot plan where detail is not obscurred or prepared as a separate exhibit): - Vicinity map showing major street names, other reference points and landmarks (no scale) - North arrow - Scale - General drainage pattern of area to include site and adja- cent properties within 100' (use arrows to show drainage flow to and from site). - Existing contour lines including property corners - Proposed locations of structures and drives - Elevations of pads and finished floors - Finished grades - Elevations of existing street centerline - Retaining walls (where applicable) - Perimeter walls and fences which affect drainage DRB Process Page Three VI. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS (all sides of all buildings): A. Items to be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board and Planning Commission require the architectural ele- vation submittal described below. Three (3) full size drawings (one (1) of which is to be color keyed -- see "Color and Material Exhibits, Item No. VIII). Detailed drawings must include: Scaled drawings of all sides of all buildings, with dimensions indicating proposed height (also show proposed sign locations). Roof mounted air conditioning equipment or other equipment mounted on either the exterior walls or the roof must be shown if visible in elevation view. Complete street elevations including all buildings, fencing/walls, landscaping and screening; and, peri- meter treatment on non -street sides.• 2. One (1) copy of the elevation drawing(s) containing all of the general information above, except that it is to be drafted or photographically reduced to an 8j"x1l" or 13" size sheet. (All lettering to be legible; include graphic scale.) B. Items to be reviewed and approved by Planning Division Staff only require three (3) full size copies of the building elevations, with other information as requested. VII. SIGN PROGRAM (if applicable): Three (3) copies of drawings to scale representing all proposed signs, containing the fol- lowing information: - Scale used - Sign shape - Dimensions and sign area - All graphics and lettering to appear on the sign - Style of lettering to be used and width of strokes - Proposed method of illumination (if appropriate) - Method of attachement to any structure, or support if placed on the ground - Proposed colors and materials (see Item No. VIII) - Proposed location (see Item No. III) - Illustration of sign integration in architectural design (see Item No. VI) VIII. COLORS AND MATERIAL EXHIBITS: Exhibits are to be submitted for architectural elevations, walls, paving materials, signs, etc., as follows: - Detailed written description (1 copy) in addition to actual color and material samples of all exterior (and sign) colors and materials to be used. An example of this would be as follows: DRB Process Page Four VIII. COLORS AND MATERIAL EXHIBITS: (Cont.) Building Walls Roof Trim Material: Sand Finish Mission Barrel Ruff Sawn Redwood Stucco Tile Color: Ameritone No. 112, Candle Red (Clay Olympic Stain Glow Tone) Dark Oak Wall Signs Materials: Sandblasted/Routed Redwood Color: Background - oak stain, Letters - white or Materials: Metal sign cabinet, plexiglass face Color: Background - ivory, Letters and Frame - dark brown - One (1) file copy color and material sample board (maximum size 8x13 inches by 3/8 inches thick containing precise color swatches and photographs (which may be clipped from suppliers' brochures) of materials which are too large to attach. - One (1) copy of the architectural and/or sign elevations colored to represent the selected color combinations, with symbols keyed to the written description. You may list the colors and materials in a corner of the elevation draw- ing or on a separate sheet. Renderings are not required unless specifically requested by the reviewing body. (See Item No. VI). -IX. FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS: Three (3) copies of plans of all struc- tures (to scale) with dimensions. Floor plans should be Labeled with the use of each room. Roof plans should indicate changes in roof heights, and illustrate any mechanical equipment. Roof detail could possibly be incorporated in the plot plan. X. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Three (3) copies of a landscape development plan at a min. scale of 1" = 20 ft. (1" = 40 feet allowable if tree plan is on separate sheet from shrub and ground cover plan), showing the following: - Location of all trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover in those areas subject to public view - Botanical name and size of all plant material (labeled) - One (1) copy of plan to have individual trees and major shrub forms color -coded by species so that the distribu- tion may be easily distinguished - Perimeter treatment of property (fences, walls, vegetation screens, etc.) - Street furniture and ornamentation (if applicable) to include: - rock outcroppings - benches - fountains - water scape plan - statues - newspaper stands - Type of irrigation system to be used (in note form only; provide complete irrigation plans with construction drawings) DRB Process Page Five XI, EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN: Three (3) copies at the same scale, or combined with the landscape plan; to show all exterior lighting, its location, and type of fixtures for illumination of areas such as driveways, parking lots, storage areas, land- scape planters, tennis courts, and the building. XII. APPLICATION FILING FEE: Provide a check payable to the City of Palm Desert in the specified amount. A. Applications requiring Design Review Board and Planning Commission review/approval, fifty dollars ($50.00). B. Applications that may receive administrative approval from the Director of Environmental Services (or his appointed Staff), including single-family dwellings, fifteen dollars ($15.00). C. Sign Program Only - Less than $100 in value, $0 - Staff Review, $10.00 - Design Review Board and Planning Commission review $15.00 FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS In the final application for a of construction drawings shall by the Design Review Board and cisely confoto any Conditio mission actionrm. Construction - cribed in the Initial Review, tions, detailed in final form. building permit phase, three (3) copies be submitted for items Reviewed/Approved Planning Commission. Plans must pre- .+ ..4 Ar.r.v�..�l romiiroA by Dlannlnv l:nm- drawings shall include the exhibits des - plus any conditioned revisions or addi- NOTE: All plans (except are to be folded of 81"x1311, prior an application. colored exhibits) to a maximum size to submitting with CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION APPLICANTS' GUIDE TO PROCEDURES I. FILING PROCEDURE: Prior to submittal the applicant shall discuss his pro- posal with the Planning staff to determine whether or not the proposal is in conformance with the General Plan and to determine zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, or other requirements. II. GENERAL INFORMATION: A. Meetings: 1) City Council meetings are held on the second and fourth Thursday of each month, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane. 2) Planning Commission meetings are held on Tuesday, nine (9) days prior to the first Council meeting of the month, also at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers and Wednesday, eight (8) days prior to the second Council meeting of the month, at 1:00 PM in the Council Chambers. 3) The Design Review Board convenes on Tues- day, a week before the Planning Commission, at 2:30 PM in the Council Chambers. B. Public Hearing: Public hearings are held when the City considers re- quests for a change of zone, variance, conditional use permit, general plan amendment, etc. Legal notices for these hearings are published in the Palm Desert Post at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. Public hearing items before the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency are published in the Desert Sun. C. Appeals: Where the Zoning Ordinance provides for appeal to the City Council or Planning Commission, the appeal shall be made within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision by filing an application of appeal with the Director of Environmental Services. D. Fees: All required fees are listed in the Fee Schedule, as approved by the City Council, and specifically noted for this application. E. Building Permits: Building permits are issued by the Department of Building and Safety and are required before any new construction, re- construction, plumbing, mechanical work is commenced. F. Business License: Prior to engaging in an enterprise for profit, zoning and building code clearance for the proposed use is required and a city business license obtained. Application should be made to the Code En- forcement Supervisor. G. Private Deed Restrictions: Many parcels of land in the City of Palm Desert are subject to private covenants, conditions, and deed restrictions which may conflict with the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. The applicant is responsible for resolving conflicts with deed restriction requirements.