The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About108C S&J MANAGEMENT2q OO 5 RE ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Applicant (Viwse onnt) j 73 -()(n I (= L- PAI face JLL t Tr i (y 714 - 3!i(o-Q(o7-4 Mailing Address Telephone -PAL.ttil I L� agr CALL FU2"t A City State Zip -Cade REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) IC) 2>uLLC> AW C (c BCC« -'Diu 6 ON -TP-6- F oc_L.owl tsc� OU5cez13C7 _ (2oPUjrrV s{ S. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: �C'T J iI LC IG ';G")PALMA y(LLAC�E' UWtT' LCe. i F�e4JIrYlLa [X IN MAa �lx c tt ZOI l%C�v€ 3�0€�,tlaL Mcaa -Qzu.¢JS ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. %2S-094 - 06 EXISTING ZONING C- :- (LP) Property Owner Authorization THE UNR DERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION. 5'GNAIUKt DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTU)NS. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRILTIONS THAT MAY APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. �. (-3/-79 SIGNATURE DATE Applicants Signature rj - (�QI�� I-2MF at I 1 SIGNATURE DATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACCAPTED BY�(vI ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. (l/��J^ rl� ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION E NO. �� C_ ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION 0 OTHER REFERENCE CASE NO. (Zpt:(�'J IPE�IL=ra 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT REPORT ON: Cc mercial Structure CASE NO.: 108 C Date ZONE: C-1, S.P. LOCATION: North side of Highway 111, west of DeAnza 2/7/79 APPLICANT: S and J.Management, Inc. NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary site, floor and elevation DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB CMINUED this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: 2/6/79 Motion Made By: Leung Seconded By: Urrutia Vote: 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Urrutia, Leung) Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: 1. See enclosed Minutes. i I AE. C'ot-ne-L tqless4nglo iL.] b7-uyru,J40a FLot.-�y m S W =Conan - Hwyltl -_M"'- :.453' S E :�OV'AeIL l Hw�_�►L i Vl W L'of�lneri " TUGNRUuJ v_ f} �p�SWr�1W CITY 13;r PALM DESERT DFP"r PTMCUTOF rlgv R -` AWL'ITAL SERVICES. . •�- RES. NOr ICl STAFF LETTER /n±OFTNIS CI O.R.B. ACTIpR RM ��VVI//✓//AAAIIICONSCOYNENCE•RNWt ONE AMROVAL. �- _ -_- I— _ mow'^-�.��...--�11',• 1 I L_ �J o � in - i- CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ��BIT " NO Vr's��i6t� P-.tiG?t= Ei� AL.uM -v'c7 L.G i$... 3'.LS.w`�. iy3Lb CiNZi. v1r>r�:asr_~` I? O \.`..;' `.a F I L rz R t?o 1= : :Elj U K Q or's r-m- 11A.gcz: 0 A�- x RA � Tn rR r. V 'r 0I Vanagement, Inc. PRESENT' OWNER: Gary Wallace PO Box 65 E1 Segundo, CA 90245 NEW WIER: S & J MANAGEMENT, INC. 73061 El Paseo #6 Palm Desert, CA 92260 ARCHITECT: R D DESIGN 73241 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE 833 Dover Drive, Suite 6 Newport Beach, California 92663 (714) 645-1320 PALM DESERT OFFICE 73-061 El Paseo, Suite 6 Palm Desert, California 92260 (714) 346-0624 f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 477 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF MARCH 20, 1979. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of March 20, 1979, approving: Case No. 111C - Request for approval of preliminary, site plans, landscaping, architectural elevations, and signing program for commercial building (bank) for WELLS FARGO BANK; Case No. 108C - Request for approval of preliminary and construction plans for commercial building for S & J MANAGEMENT; Case No. 169MF - Request for approval of conceptual site plan and landscape plan; construction elevations and floor plans; and colors and materials for condominium develop- ment for DAME'-DOTY DEVELOPMENT CO. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of March 20, 1979. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of March 20, 1979. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 3rd day of April, 1979, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, FLESHMAN, KRYDER, SNYDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ss WALTER H. SNYDER, Chairman Minutes Page Five Pai+e4sert Planning Commission April 3, 1979 VI. D. (cont.) Mr. Allen then asked if these mobile homes would be recessed, and Air. Williams answered yes - - they would be comparable to Palm Desert Greens. F. X. MC DONALD, Jr., Long Beach, stated that he owns 40 acres north of Palm Desert Estates, and last July, the City took 10 acres from his land for habitat of the Fringe -Toed Lizards. Mr. McDonald wondered why they have not done the same for the subject request; shouldn't this be Open Space also. Shouldn't other developers have to give up a quarter of their land to Open Space. Mr. Williams stated that the City has recently developed a Master Plan of Parks and Recreation, whereby they defined the Sand Dune Park as the area north of 42nd Avenue. With the adoption of that plan, the previous designation was deleted. Chairman Snyder stated that this property falls outside the jurisdiction of the park requirements of the General Plan. He sympathizes with the question and hopes that we can solve it some day. Chairman Snyder declared the Public Hearing closed, asking for the pleasure of the Commission. On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Berkey, Planning Commission Resolution No. 475 was approved with the deletion of the words "or any other zone deemed appropriate" where applicable; carried 3-0-1 (AYES: Berkey, Kryder, Snyder; ABSTAIN: Fleshman). [HMI. OLD BUSINESS - None VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Coachella Valley County Water District Projects in the City of Palm Desert Mr. Williams reviewed the proposals, noting that that the request is to find the proposals in compliance with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan. Chairman Snyder commented that he hoped Public .Works will continue to have Coachella Valley County Water District put streets back in good condition at the conclusion of projects. On a motion by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Fleshman, Planning Commission Resolution No. 476 was approved as presented; carried unanimously (4-0). B. Consideration of date change for May 1, 1979, Planning Commission meeting Mr. Williams explained that a conflict of dates would occur h-)an etween the May 1 meeting and the Planning Commissioners Conference in Diego for the Cal Chapter of APA. On a Minute Motion by Commissioner Kryder, the May 1, 1979 Planning Commission meeting was changed to May 3, 1979; carried unanimously (4-0). IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Consideration of cases acted upon by the Design Review Board at their March 20, 1979 meeting Mr. Crump reviewed the three case OSC; 111C; 169AIF) the Design Review Board acted upon. L_ Minutes Palm Desert Planning Commission April 3, 1979 IK. (cont.) Page Six Chairman Snyder asked if any of the applicants wished to make a presentation. Mr. Dame' commented on Case No. 169 MF, referring to the recommendations of the Design Review Board regarding gabled roofs - he noted that they plan to minimize the use of gabled roofs as much as possible, and will not use them at all on 5-unit buildings. On a motion by Commissioner Fleshman, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the actions of the Design Review Board at their March 20, 1979 meeting were approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 477, as presented; carried unanimously (4-0). Mr. Williams related that the Planning Commission will be reviewing a change in the composition of the Design Review Board at :their next Study Session meeting. :K. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None KI. COMMENTS A. City Staff - None B. City Attorney - Not present C. Planning Commissioners - None KII. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary ATTEST WALTER H. SNYDER, Chairman /ss Case No. 111 C - WELLS FARGO BANK (John Outcault, Architect) - Approval of preliminaryplans for construction of a bank building located on the southwest corner of E1 Paseo and Lantana. Applicant's representative present. The Board reviewed a revised site plan for the site and was also presented a further revision prepared by the applicant. Discussion followed relative to planter design and the need for landscape material to soften the building elevations. Board recommendation for revisions to the preliminary site plan were recorded on the plan in the file of the Department of Environmental Services. Motion was made by Urrutia, seconded by Barton, to approve preliminary plans subject to the following revisions: 1. Submit revised site plan reflecting the notations on the plan in the file of the Dept. of Environmental Services, with the construction drawings. 2. Provide Ordinance requirement for six foot distance from property line to parking stall by increasing planter width in the southeast corner of the site. 3. Submit revised landscape plan with final construction drawings to address changes in planter area design. 4. Submit larger scale (precise) drawings for sign program, with final construction drawings. carried 4-0 (Johnson, Urrutia, Leung, Barton). J Case No. 108 C - S & J MANAGEMENT - Approval of preliminary drawings and final construction drawings for a commercial building located north of Highway 111, west of DeAnza Way. Applicant was present. The Board reviewed the previously recommended revisions as they applied to the site plan and elevations. The landscaping plan was reviewed in terms of plant material and selection of trees. The Board noted that several revisions to the landscaping plan would be necessary. Motion was made by Urrutia, seconded by Barton, to approve preliminary and final construction drawings, subject to the following revisions: 1. Provide revised final landscape plan for Staff approval incor- porating the notations contained on the plan in the file of the Department of Environmental Services. carried 4-0 (Johnson, Urrutia, Leung, Barton). Case No. 68 MF - PALM DESERT VENTURE, LTD., (Francisco Urrutia, Architect) - Approval of final construction drawings and revised wall detail for the final phase of Shadow Mountain development, located on the east side of San Luis Rey (south of Juniper Circle). Applicant was present. The Board reviewed the details of the construction site plan and pro- posed wall amendments. Previous conditions of approval for Development Plan 06-77 were also noted and it was found that they had generally been complied with. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Barton, the Board approved final construction drawings for the 29 unit phase and revised project wall detail, subject to the following: 1.- That all conditions of Development Plan 06-77 be met; and that all conditions of the original Design Review be met, with specific attention to condition No. 9, requiring final landscape plan submittal. 2. That carport structures for building No. 9 be erected prior to the request for granting an occupancy permit. 3. Provide overhead storage cabinets in carports. carried 3-0-1 (AYES: Johnson, Leung, Williams; ABSTAIN: Urrutia). DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO.: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: 108 C S & J Management DATE March 20, 1979 North of Highway 111, west of DeAnza Way C-1, S.P. This item was continued from the February 20, 1979, Board meeting to allow the applicant to revise preliminary site and landscape plans (see attached). Revised plans have been submitted, that are not specifically in line with recommended revisions. The landscape plan appears to need additional consideration to provide a faster growing tree if 15 gallon size is used and the specific variety of shrub needs to be specified. The driveway entrance may be acceptable as indicated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve preliminary plans subject to the following revisions: 1. Landscape Plan a. Provide revised final landscape plan with construction drawings specifying exact type of shrubs, and select alternative to 15 gallon olive trees by either increasing size or offering a different variety of tree. 2. Elevations a. Delete wood shown under windows. Minutes Page 1tw Palm Desert Design Review Board February 20, 1979 III. Case No. 148 MF (cont. 3. Plant material shall be used as indicated on the plans in the files of the Department of Environmental Services. 4. A precise shrub plan for dwelling units shall be submitted for Board Chairman's approval. carried 4-0 (Johnson, Jackson, Urrutia, Williams). Case No. 104 C - JOHN F. OUTCAULT, A.I.A. FOR J. WELDS - Final construction drawings for commercial structure and related parking to be located north of Highway 111, east of Las Palmas. Applicant was present. The Board reviewed final plans for the project. The applicant submitted a new set of plans addressing Staff concerns and these were found to be generally acceptable. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved final plans, subject to the following revision: 1. Replace Carolina Cherries with Pyracantha, on the west. carried 4-0 (Johnson, Jackson, Urrutia, Williams). Case No. 110 C - J. SEGALL - Final construction drawings for a commercial addition to be located on the northwest corner of Cabrillo and Highway 111. Applicant was present. The Board reviewed various elements of the proposed construction; reviewing materials of construction, the aesthetic aspects of the structure and landscaping. Also discussed were structural requirements to support the. structure and satisfy wind load requirements. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Johnson, Jackson having left the roan, the Board moved to continue the item to allow the applicant to poet with the Building Department to discuss structural requirements, and to review the elevation of the structure and landscaping to screen it; carried 3-0-1 (AYES: Johnson, Urrutia, Williams ABSENT: Jackson). Case No. 108 MF - AMERICAN WEST - Final construction drawings for a 5-unit apartment complex to be located on the southwest corner of Driftwood and Sunset. Applicant was present. The Board discussed the final construction drawings and landscaping plans, which were required to be submitted to the Board. On a motion by Williams, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the plans, subject to the following revisions: Landscape Plan 1. Specify 5-gallon Oleanders, 10 foot O.C. 2. Specify future pool area to be in lawn. 3. Specify a/c pad locations, to be approved by Staff. carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Urrutia, Williams). J Case No. 108 C - S AND J MANAGENMNr - Preliminary plans for reconsideration of commercial structure and related parking, to be located north of Highway 111, west of DeAnza Way. Applicant not present. The Board discussed the various aspects of the preliminary plans, evaluated the plot plan, landscaping plan and building elevations. This itan bad been continued to allow the applicant to restudy the plans_ On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board continued the item to allow the applicant to consider the following revisions: IDA� Minutes Palm Desert Design Review Board February 20, 1979 III. Case No. 108 C (cont.) Plot Plan Page Three 1. Increase planter area along Alessandro to 8 feet, including two -foot overhang of adjacent parking spaces. 2. Delete parking space in front of rear entrance and provide for sidewalk access from parking lot. 3. Provide for driveway connection to existing parking lot to the west if adjacent property owner isagreeable. 4. Revise parking lot to provide driveway entrance near west property line. Landscaping Plan Submit revised landscaping plan for Board approval reflecting the following: 1. Minimum of 15-gallon size trees. 2. Provide alternate to Oleanders - landscape on the sides of parking areas should be compatible to adjacent existing landscaping. 3. Provide alternative treatment along Alessandro in terms of plant material and the inclusion of mounding similar to existing treatment. 4. Complete revision of front landscaping to be submitted to Board. Elevations 1. Provide comprehensive Sign Program for the building. 2. Delete wood shown under windows. carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Urrutia, Williams). Case No. 166 MF - O. R0INEEiG AND J. J. TONER - Preliminary site plan and elevations for a duplex to be located on the northwest corner of Las Palmas and San Gorgonio Way. Applicant was present. The Board reviewed the various aspects of the preliminary site plan, elevations, and project landscaping. There were specific concerns with the landscaping plan and the site plan. On a motion by Williams, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the plan, subject to the following revisions: Landscaoe and Site Plan 1. Install sidewalk as required by the Director of Public Works. 2. Extend wall on northerly property line, easterly to garage to create private patio for northerly units. 3. Extend wall easterly along San Gorgonio Way to enclose patio for south unit. 4. Provide shade structure for patio area from south unit. 5. Upgrade landscaping in following areas: A. Along San Gorgonio Way adjacent to wall area and adjacent to garage. B. Adjacent to southerly garage along Las Palmas. C. Provide shade trees southerly of pool area in rear yard area (suggest Sterculia) clustered in a group of three to four trees. D. Along Las Palms Avenue, add trees and provide low planting to tie landscaping design together. C5t:a�J�r off Win= 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date:_ 2 . �9,1 � 9 REPORT ON: Reconsideration of conanercial structure and related parking CASE NO.: 108 C ZONE: C-1, S.P. LOCATION: North of Highway 111, west of DeAnza Way APPLICANT: S AMID J MANAGF] ENE' NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB CONFINUED this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: February 20, 1979 Motion Made By: Seconded By: Vote: Unanimous Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City CZerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (ZS) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: See enclosed Minutes. nyo wu awin l,v. ul — � DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DATE February 20, 1979 CASE NO.: 108 C APPLICANT: S and J Management, Inc. LOCATION: North of Highway 111, west of DeAnza, between Young's Cafeteria and Palm Desert Realty Building ZONING: C-1, S.P. Continued from Design Review Board meeting of February 6, 1979 for restudy. Applicant has submitted revised building elevations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve, with following revisions to be provided as a part of the final plans. 1. Increase planter along Alessandro to 8', including 2' overhang of adjacent parking spaces 2. Delete parking space in front of rear entrance and provide for sidewalk access from parking lot 3. Provide for driveway connection to existing parking lot to the west if adjacent property owner is agreeable 4. Reverse parking lot to provide driveway entrance near west property line 5. Provide building cutout at southeast corner to integrate project with adjacent development Landscape Plan Revise to reflect the following: 1. Minimum of 15 gallon trees 2. Alternative to Oleanders - landscape on the sides of parking areas should be compatible to adjacent existing landscaping 3. Alternative treatment along Alessandro in terms of plant materials and the inclusion of mounding similar to existing treatment Minutes Palm Desert Design Review Board February 6, 1979 III. (cunt.) Case No. 72 C - (cont.) f Page No On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Leung, the item was continued to allow the applicant to respond to - one, the reduction and size of sign, the change in color or precise color submittal; and two, the number of signs (deleting the free-standing monument sign); carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Urrutia). Case No. 108 C - S AND J MANAGE M, INC. - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a cannercial structure to be located on the north side of Highway 111, west of DeAnza Way. Applicant was present. The Board reviewed the exhibits submitted and discussed the design of the parking area pedestrian entrance to the rear of the building, and the landscape planning material on the rear of the site. The Board noted that, particularly in the front area of the building, several different architectural approaches had been taken and that they did not relate to each other, and that there needed to be additional study to produce a continuous architectural design. Also noted were equipment locations that might occur on the top of the structure and it was advised that these needed to be architecturally screened by a roof element or parapet. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Urrutia, the item was continued for restudy; carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Urrutia). Case No. 322 SA - STERLING SIGN CO. - Sign program for a comnercial structure located on the north side of Highway 111, east of Monterey. Applicant was present. The Board reviewed the signing request, noting that provision for sign above the eave line was not in concert with the sign ordinance. The Board discussed alternatives to signing placed on top of the front porch overhang, and determined that it would be acceptable to mount a sign hung below the front edge of the porch as illustrated on plans in the Department of Environmental Services. The Board suggested that the sign be constructed of sandblasted wood and that a planter be located underneath the sign to avoid any pedestrian conflict. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board continued the case for restudy; carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Urrutia). Case No. 101 C - PALM DESERT RACQUEMALL AND HEALTH CLUB - Revised site plan for racquetball and health club to be located on the northwest corner of Painters Path and Highway 111. Applicant was present. The Board noted in the review of the revised Design Review submittal that the prior approval had been the subject of several discussions. The Board felt that the.plans, as previously approved, reflected their concerns and Planning Ccnmission's concerns for reducing the overall mass of the build- ing, by depressing it below the natural grade, and by providing mounding and landscaping to further blend the building into its surroundings. The Board was concerned with the elevation in that it presented a more formal style of architecture that dominated the site rather than blending it into the hillside backdrop. There was a discussion among the Board members as to the proximity of the revised building in relation to the property line along Painters Path. Board member Urrutia felt that the setback provided in the previous approval is necessary to allow for mounding and land- scaping to reduce the height and mass of the building. Board member Jackson felt that bringing the building forward could be acceptable. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Jackson, -- -- for a restudy of the following,. items: the Board continued the case w x d 0 A r d; s 1 i t-y _ C? PC aD� q Fr 2 p F 1 Ian L41_J g1 F r iyw ogh r ; S ro D • . oil;�! 0 Fi a r I � �I • � xd • i6:1 i P 2N• PLANTING 0 +[Y 0 � ' - • PLwuriu4 Y•J-•�� TL�NT�Y4 .^-E £ F� JP F S 80C1 THB-t.lpl��` • AACF9i7ECT'UM r A A11iN1 +W O P � F } P lM O�OAf1 CMYr aC'W yip • . e . Y •t . 6 - RA 6Nv,.1414TIC/.L NtO� a ID LC [M-I CC U. \pwu�G3 wo00 2�TYY. �jTJ4s VASE �yo • �S G r...wr Y... W.. FE-Dh m m [D it NQ2TLL E VATj t4 Taa¢M•LL Ym. aYa. siix,re- hYn.. u. ID ti 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMPfISSION ACTION April 4, 1979 APPLICANT S & J Management Co. CASE NO.: 108 C The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of April 3, 1979 CONTINUED DENIED % APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 477 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant CV. C.t1j.D �/. File TC.A. 16'02, /aso POR. S NW4SEC21T5S R 6E. ( , 0 B ia. 9¢v y � �Ii a � . � 2 O � 3 ,s x x r I dOos5 O sb +®a . f ^ i � 4 /o !III T ALC�59ANDRD . 09 /O ; 8 Of a9➢ N O O! /➢OIa .� 9 � i 8 5 6 7 8 T ALC�59ANDRD . 09 /O ; 8 Of a9➢ N O O! /➢OIa .� 9 � i 8 5 6 7 8 0L 0. v PALM AL M D ES E R T I R 9 20183 Polmo Vi//o e Unil No 6 M.8 2//58 No. 8 DATA RWY.MAP V///-R/V-/87-C ✓UNE 1967 /2 'o O 0 9 J , •3a •Bkl' l /N II O � I O . 7, I ASSESSOR'S MAP aK 625 P0. 09 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CALIF, ASSESSOR'S MAP aK 625 P0. 09 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CALIF, v � 4 'S'ki' 1 )• .S. SI '.. A FF L= a Fr tea,,. :z1i% z I 1__ _ �'�_ �`�d "7� ►moo -�L I } Y� is f ( .` y�{ i� �.`• ;` � � � ,3' :br ,sad � Yti UN o i _ Q V L ,7, ~ 2 z Iyj _ 1 I F L o ° v,? t4 t - — --. 1 I z J. cu la � IL'J f 1 ''ell i i E •t } I 17 C-D fi I PI W ILI -j