HomeMy WebLinkAbout107C IRA L JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES:r
Minutes
Palm Desert
February 14,
Planning Commission
1979
VI. C. (cont.)
Page Six
CHARLES MARTIN, 73744 Highway 111. Mr. Martin suggested
that up to 3 dwelling units per acre in the 5-acre parcel
portion of the study area be considered. He also re-
commended that the matter of sewage disposal be left to
the Riverside County Department of Health.
He suggested the continued use of at grade crossings rather
than bridge crossings; he does not want to see the small
landowner financially tied by the improvements proposed.
Mr. Martin also stated his position on structure design and
the need for structures to be compatible with land forms,
particularly in this unique area.
DICK WILLBERG, Perkins and Will, Chicago, Illinois.
Mr. Willbert indicated that he had been employed by G. George
Fox to prepare a financial feasibility analysis for the Fox
property and to prepare alternative conceptual development
plans. He reiterated the concerns of his client and his
firm's in the preparation of the conceptual plans.
The Public Hearing was then closed. The Commissioners
recapitulated the concerns raised and made the following recommendations:
1. Use a less definitive delineation of zoning lines on the
proposed zoning map and pay closer attention to the
existing property lines.
2. Increase the density in the flatter portions of the study
area to PR-3.
3. Eliminate all but one bridge crossing and continue
maintenance of at grade crossings and other access points.
The Commission then suggested, and the Staff concurred, that
a draft resolution addressing possible changes to the Palm Valley
Stormwater Channel Area Specific Plan be prepared for consideration
on February 27, 1979.
On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner
Kryder, the matter was continued to February 27, 1979; carried
unanimously (5-0).
VII. OLD BUSINESS - None
VIII. NEW BUSINESS
A. On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner
Flesbman, Planning Commission Resolution No. 459 was adopted as
presented, announcing its appreciation to Ralph J. Cipriani.
I%. &I DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS
A. Consideration of cases acted on by the Design Review Board
at their meeting of February 6, 1979.
Commissioner Fleshman had a conflict of interest
to Case No. 164 MF, and left the room while it was being
Mr. Crump presented the cases (164 MF, 107 C; and
Commission.
with regard
discussed.
42 C) to the
Minutes Page Seven
Palm Desert Planning Commission
February 14, 1979
IX. (cont.)
On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner
Berkey, Planning Commission Resolution No. 460 was adopted, approving
the Design Review Board actions of February 6, 1979, with the
following modifications:
Case 107 C - Add additional requirements as follows:
4. Opening be provided in the landscape planter
along west property line to permit connection
to existing driveway.
5. Access easement be granted to the City over
. the parking areas.
carried 4-0-1 (AYES: Berkey, Kelly, Kryder, Snyder; ABSTAIN: Fleshman).
X. DISCUSSION ITEMS - None
XI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None
XII. COMMENTS
A. City Staff - None
B. City Attorney - Not present
C. Planning Commissioners - None
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner
Kryder, the meeting was adjourned at 3:45 p.m.
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary
ATTEST:
GLORIA KELLY, Chairman
/ss
.-� IfI.__,
'1)
CITY OF
PALM DESERT
DEPARTMENT
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES
EXMIP1
No. —
CASE
l�Ire L Jeh0000. A.lk Archim
• AllK • LAM KAWM*
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE 2/15/79
APPLICANT IRA L. JOHNSCN & ASSOCIATES
CASE NO.: 107 C
The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request
and taken the following action at its meeting of
February 14, 1979
CONTINUED TO
DENIED
% APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 460
PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DECISION.
PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental
Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION
cc: Applicant
C.V.C.W.D.
File V
ti
t
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 460
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING
FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ACTIONS OF FEBRUARY 6, 1979.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert,
California, did review the Design Review Board actions of February 6, 1979,
( approving:
Ill Case No. 164MF - Preliminary and final drawings for 150
condominium units for Silver Spur Associates;
Case No. 107C - Preliminary site, floor and elevations for a
commercial structure for Ira L. Johnson & Assoc.;
Case No. 42C - Sign program for a commercial structure for
Frank Goodman.
WHEREAS, .at this time, upon considering and receiving all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to
be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist
to approve the Design Review Board actions of February 6, 1979.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and consti-
tute the findings of the Commission in this case;
2. That the Commission does hereby approve the Design Review
Board actions of February 6, 1979, with the following
modifications:
Case 107C - Add additional requirements as follows:
4. Opening be provided in the landscape
planter along west property line to permit
connection to existing driveway.
5. Access easement be granted to the City over
the parking areas.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm
Desert Planning Commission, held on this 14th day of February, 1979,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, KRYDER, SNYDER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: FLESHMAN
GLORIA KELLY, Chairman
ATTEST:
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary
/ss
G:t-cbov- o:ff U=1'a
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-06I1
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT
REPORT ON: Coimiercial structure
CASE NO.: 107 C
Date
ZONE: C-1, S.P.
2/7/79
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Highway Ill and El Paseo, East Palm Desert
APPLICANT: Ira L. Johnson and Assoc.
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary site, floor and elevation
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by
the staff and by the applicant, the DRB APPROVED
this project, subject to revisions.
Date of Action: 2/6/79
Motion Made By: Urrutia
Seconded By: Leung
Vote: 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Urrutia, Leung)
Reasons for Negative Vote (s):
(An appeaZ of the above action may be made in writing to the City CZerk
of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (Z5) days of the date of the
decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS:
1. See enclosed Minutes.
2. Scheduled for Planning Commission agenda, meeting of
February 14, 1979.
t
I
II.
•V wo Film NIUM'I M=al.
The meeting was called to order at 2:40 p.m., after a 1i hour Study Session.
Members present
Members absent
Staff present
Eric Johnson
Phyllis Jackson
Bernie Leung
Frank Urrutia
Paul Williams
Jim Hill
Vern Barton
Murrel Crump
Ralph Cipriani
Clyde Beebe
It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Leung, that the minutes of January 23,
1979, be approved subject to the addition of Staff comments under Item IV, B,
Case No. DP 01-79; carried 3-0-1 (AYES: Jackson, Johnson, Leung ABSTAIN: Urrutia).
Motion was made by Johnson, seconded by Leung, to caarend Associate Planner
Ralph Cipriani for his efforts and cooperation during the 22 months he has
worked with the Design Review Board; carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Urrutia;
Motion was made by Urrutia, seconded by Leung to approve the following
cases reviewed in Study Sessions, subject to revisions as indicated:
1. Provide alternative to chain link fence proposed (suggest use of
wrought iron and earth mounding with grouping of trees).
2. Work citrus trees into landscaping plan.
3. Delete suggested plant materials and trees from planning list as indicated
on the plan in file of the Department of Environmental Services.
4. Provide 20' driveway aprons for units (except those units backing to
Portola).
5. Increase radius at entrance intersection.
6. Provide parking bays in close proximity to the entry pool area.
Case No. 107 C
1. Maintain low planting on corner to avoid sight restriction.
2. Provide trash enclosure for new building.
3. Reconcile number of parking spaces to building area or request adjust-
ment.
Carried 4-0 (Johnson, Jackson, Leung, Urrutia).
III. CASES
Case No. 72 C - DANIEL DWORSKY ASSOCIATES - Sign program for a camiercial
structure to be located on the southwest corner of Highway 111 and Highway 74.
Applicant was not present.
The Board reviewed the exhibits sulmitted,noting that the size of the signs
were out of scale with the structure, and found that the red color proposed
was not acceptable. They recamiended that the wattage of any sign be
carefully considered because of its dominance on this corner. It was also
observed that the individual tenant would not be eligible for a free-
standing sign, as it was part of a larger development.
ytj
af��� u� L
v it q.
,r
CITY 6F
PALM CESERT
DEPARTMENT
OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES
EXHIBIT
" y In L AIIMM ILIA 1
�" R. TER 9• P." CIE-15GMT PLRLFI
�� AIIMllr1 MOIIItTw W
71--
m
2:
ca
to 5
of
r—
cam
rn
1-&
2P�z5 ag ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD***
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
oc"nI ICQT• Ine«.I6n —'-fin nnfurn of nnnrnvnI ramiestRAI
PROPERTY DE�CRIPTIO Ni
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
EXISTING ZONING
cer A" d�
Property Owner Authorization THE UN RSIGNED STATES THAT THEY. RE T WNERtS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR-
IZATION OR THE FILING THIS APPGI ATIO
/ /7 7
SIGN OA E
AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL L TIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIDNS.
I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON HIS AGRE MENT, A.QSOLV E CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES-
/ApICT rS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN.
7
SIG NRE DATE
Applicants Signature
(FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
❑ MINISTERIAL ACT
❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION
❑ OTHER
E.A. No.
!� 1 /7 b
E I I DATE
ACCEPTED BY =-
�td'
k'A'SE No. .
REFERENCE CASE NO.
/07 C
y
the Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert
reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
IS COURTS
M
DEPARTMENT DESIGN ( PLANNING t DEPARTMENT
LIGATION OF ENVIRON- REVIEW (—\ COMMISSION \ BUILDING AND
MENTAL BOARD L� (APPROVES OR L� SAFETY
SERVICES (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT)
STAFF
INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS
PROCESSING SCHEDULE:
CONSTRUCT
ION
SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may
be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check.
MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B.
and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days.
In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative
should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding
the project.
STAFF USE ONLY:
Date Received
Date of
ACTOR'Meeting
ACTION
APPLICANT NOTIFIED
Staff
DRB
P.C.
C.C.
Department of Environmental Services Form 1
.1
CITY OF PALM DESERT
APPLICATION FORM
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS
Design Review of:
�. W �h5d-1
CASE NO.
Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply
with all the following requirements, and understand that
the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a
building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted
until this signed confirmation has been received by the
Department of Environmental Services.
The development of this project shall conform substantially
to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case,
and as revised according to the Design Review Board process.
Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi-
ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap-
proval by the Design Review Board.
All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of
the State, City, and any other applicable government entity
shall be complied with as part of the development process.
This approval is applicable, subject to the development of
this project, commencing within one year from approval date
and being promptly completed.
Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed
prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of
occupancy.
Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided
along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation
prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by
the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan-
d4rds and all requirements of the City Engineer.
(Date)
Department of Environmental Services Form 1
625-
I
i
--w4co. _
I T
ti
T. C. A. /626, /629, /83/ 2 4 4
N NW SW SEC. 2/ T. 5 S R 6 E.
I�LN. OLO R/W
' I
a
+ 6 TA F —
1 �-S. LN. OLO R/W
0..N.IY
\♦ le
Q
0
� �
I
n»
/ u
2
3
I I
4 I 5 I 6
7 I B
9
/O +
//
I
�07/AC-41
I
I
r`
4o
<•
q.
1�.4! ��Y
4 I b /r 4 /
1 75•
2 a ,. / f Lor /
OE6BRr
6AROEN
M EL
of ei------------_'_ /3
M. B. 40125 rroc! 20/2
O
I//6 Cr
w I
OLD R/W -7
r-
I;
M I
— _..� — a ion a/•-__ — — — ���
0
m
OA rA V/R-R/V-/67-C.
X/-RIV-64-4
ASSESSOR'S MAP RC 625 M /l
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF• &
✓ULY /967
i.
J�
H
"_'
o
m o
�,
SHEET TITLE
drawn checked sed �Vi
JOB NAME
i��� C==� 7
�
address ,p
J Ira L. Johnson, A.I.A. Architect
& ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING
73-960 HIGHWAY III a PALM DESERT m CALIFORNIA
■H
tll
_;v .
i