HomeMy WebLinkAbout109C DR R G CHAN GUNNJ�POO MRE ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD***
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
PLANNING DIVISION
Dr. R. G. Chan Gunn
Applicant ( please mm)
1811 Matthews Avenue (604) 736-4668
Moiling Address Telephone
Vancouver, B. C. Canada V6J 2174
City Stale Zip -Code
REQUEST: (Describe specific ngture of approval requested)
Commercial Buildi
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 14, Block G, Palm Desert No. 1 MB 21/52
ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO.
EXISTING ZONING
Property Owner Authorization
DERSIG STATE AT THEY
Ow NERtSI OF PROPERTY DESCRIBE() HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR -
A N
FOfl FILING T IS PPP
,
'
Feb. 5. 1279
SIG
DATE
AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CIT OF PAL
R ALL ILITIES RELAT
TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS.
I DO BY MY SIGNATURE
HI GRE NTr ABS E
HE 41TY OF PA DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES-
TR
THAT M0.Y BE LILABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN.
e
Feb. 5, 1979
A)IATUE
DATE
Applicant's Signature
• //
Feb. 5, 1979
SIGNATURE
DATE
(FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
AC EPTED BY
❑ MINISTERIAL ACT
E.A. No.
6
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
CF'iC`E N0.
}❑
Ll NEGATIVE DECLARATION
J
0 OTHER
REFERENCE CASE NO.
.r
V
Design Review of:
CITY OF PALM DESERT
APPLICATION FORM
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS
Commercial Buildin
TYPE OF PROJECT
Dr. R. G. Chan Gunn
APPLICANT
CASE NO.
Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply
with all the following requirements, and understand that
the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a
building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted
until this signed confirmation has been received by the
Department of Environmental Services.
The development of this project shall conform substantially
to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case,
and as revised according to the Design Review Board process.
Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi-
ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap-
proval by the Design Review Board.
All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of
the State, City, and any other applicable government entity
shall be complied with as part of the development process.
This approval is applicable, subject to the development of
this project, commencing within one year from approval date
and being promptly completed.
Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed
prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of
occupancy.
Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided
along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation
pr' r to final inspection or other provisions as approved by
Cit Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan-
kI uirements of the City Engineer.
a7
Feb. 5 '?
(signature) (Date
Department of Environmental Services Form 1
3 r
u
y So f S
"W7 VN/dl?7 -
Agenda Item No. III -
,
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE February 20, 1979
CASE NO.: 109 C
APPLICANT: R H Ricciardi A.I.A. for Dr n
LOCATION: North of E1 Paseo east of Sage Lane
ZONING: C-1 S.P.
Preliminary site plan and elevations for'3900 sq. ft. commercial building.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
`:'.Approve, subject to the following revisions:
P1 ot- Plan
1.. Parking lot shall be redesigned to conform to adjacent lots
to the west.. Parking shall begin approximately 126 ft. -northerly
of El.Paseo
2. Trash enclosure shall be redesigned
-3. Building shall be stepped
4. A cross-section of the project shall be provided as -a part
of the final construction drawings
5. Proposed parking lot lights shall conform to approved design
for area
'6. A greater front setback, 10' - 15', shall be required to
accommodate proposed elevation treatment
Applicant will be responsible for undergrounding existing
` overhead utilities
Building Elevations
Final construction drawings shall include an acceptable Sign Program
Agreement To Enter Into
Undergrounding District
I, drit/ owner of Lot 14,
Block G of Palm Desert Tract, do hereby guarantee on behalf of
myself, all heirs and future assignees to voluntarily be a part
of a utility undergrounding district which is subsequently to be
established by the City of Palm Desert, and which is to include
the said property in its boundaries.
Furthermore, I hereby guarantee to do any site repair for the
said property which results from the removal of overhead utili-
ties, and commit all heirs and future assignees to do this work
on my behalf.
SIGNATURE:::::: DATE:
OPERTY OWNER
RECEIVED BY: DA
CITY OF PALM DESERT
ACCEPTED BY: DATE:
CITY ATTORNEY
Agreement To Enter Into
Undergrounding District
I , -, , C . G U N \ , owner of Lot 14,
Block G of Palm Desert Tract, do hereby guarantee on behalf of
myself, all heirs and future assignees to voluntarily be a part
of a utility undergrounding district which is subsequently to be
established by the City of Palm Desert, and which is to include
the said property in its boundaries.
Furthermore, I hereby guarantee to do any site repair for the
said property which results from the removal of overhead utili-
ties, and commit all heirs and future assignees to do this work
on my behalf.
SIGNATURE: -- -
PROPERTY OWNER
RECEIVED
ACCEPTED
DATE: to v
DATE:ZL
DATE: 80
3�l` - Zz90
REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION
CASE NO.: 109 C
LOCATION: North side of E1 Paseo between Sage and Lupine Lanes
ZONE: C-1, S.P.
APPLICANT: Harold McCormick for R.G. Chan Gunn
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Revised final construction and landscaping
plans for commercial structure
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the
staff and by the applicant, the Design Review Board
APPROVED this project, subject to revisions.
Date of Action: May 22, 1979
Vote:
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City
Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the
date of the decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS:
See enclosed Minutes.
Minutes
Palm Desert Design I ew Board
May 22, 1979
II. Case No. 174 MF (coat.)
5. That the project be provided with a perimeter wall, to be approved
by the Design Review Board.
6. That the private street width be decreased to 30 ft.
7. That a cul-de-sac be provided at the end of the private street.
8. That area shown as back-up area be deleted.
9. That the tennis court area be depressed with final plan for lighting
of the court approved by the Design Review Board.
III. CASES
✓Case No. 109 C - HAROLD MCOORMICK FOR R. G. CHAN GUNK - Revised final
construction and landscaping plans for commercial structure on the north
side of E1 Paseo between Sage and Lupine Lanes. Applicant was present.
The Board discussed the items which were revised since the last meeting.
Changes to the parking lot layout in order to provide 14 stalls was discussed
and determined desirable. Several revisions to the final landscaping plan
were discussed with the applicant, who indicated concurrence. The roof tile
color was discussed, with the ultimate decision being that the roof tile be
"red„
On a motion by Williams, seconded by Barton, the Board approved the final
construction drawings and landscaping plans,: subject to the following
modifications:
1. That the parking lot be redesigned to provide 14 parking spaces.
2. That all signs facing the street and facing the parking lot shall
be 18" high by a maxim= 4 ft. long.
3. That within the rear parking lot area, the planter adjacent to the
trash enclosure shall contain only one 15-gallon Ficus Retusa.
4. That the two 15-gallon Jacaranda Acutifolia be placed as far apart
as feasible.
5. That the street trees be 24" box size and be placed in 3 ft. by 3 ft.
wells.
6. That the square planters between the building and property line not
contain any trees;with shrubs in ground cover provided in said planters.
carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Urrutia, Barton).
Case No. 175 MF (DP 06-79) - McLAIN DEVEIOPMERr COMPANY - Preliminary site
plan, elevations, and landscaping plan for Palm Desert Racquet Club residential
project on the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Portola Avenue.
Applicant was present.
The Board discussed tree changes which it felt were necessary in the
typical landscape concept plans that were sutmitted by the applicant. The
private patio landscaping concept was also discussed and clarified by the
applicant. The Board indicated a desire to have variety in the blowsand
protection through the use of Eucalyptus trees. The applicant requested
--clarification of Condition No. 2, requesting that an alternative solution
be determined. However, with the implementation of the reduction of the
access areas from 30 ft. to 24 ft., it was determined that units should
be able to be provided with the required apron depth.
The applicant questioned the need for Condition No. 4, which requires
connecting the access roads along the east side of the property line.
After clarification of the reason for this condition, the applicant agreed
to joining the roadways together.
The applicant also questioned Condition No. 8 requesting that the loop
street be increased frcm 36 ft. to 40 ft. in width. The Board and Staff
clarified the reason for requesting the additional width. After discussion
regarding alternative widths, it was concluded that a 32 ft. wide loop
street was acceptable.
NDA ITEM NO. III, B-1
�u.
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CASE NO. 109 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Harold McCormick for R. G. Chan Gunn,
46-860 Amir, Palm Desert
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Revised final construction and
landscaping plans for commercial structure.
LOCATION North side of E1 Paseo, between Sage and Lupine Lanes
ZONE C-11 S.P.
This item was reviewed by the Design Review Board at the meeting of
May 8, 1979, where a number of revisions were deemed necessary (see
attached DRB Minutes). The applicant has submitted revised plans, which
for the -most part, comply with the requirements. Items 1, 2, and
4 through 10 have been complied with. The applicant was required to
file for a parking adjustment with the provision that he provide
14 parking spaces. The submitted plan shows 13 spaces with a 5 ft. wide
planter as required. Staff feels that, in this situation, the extra
parking space should be provided, with the planter deleted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Determine acceptability of landscaping plans, and approve final
construction plans, subject to the following:
1. Approval of a parking adjustment providing 14 parking spaces.
2. The revision of landscaping plans as determined by the
Design Review Board.
3. That all signs shall be 18 inches high by a maximum 4 ft. long.
4. That the roof tile be "red" as on file in the Dept. of
Environmental Services.
utes Page Ttso
talm Desert Design Rd. _.v Board
May 8, 1979
III. (cunt.)
Case No. 109 C - HAROLD MC CORMICK FOR R. G. CHAN GUNN - Final construction
plans for carmercial structure, located on the north side of El Paseo,
between Sage and Lupine lanes. Applicant was present.
The Board reviewed the final construction plans submitted by the applicant.
The applicant submitted a sign program sample, and was instructed to show the
sign on the building elevation plans. The applicant also submitted samples of
alternate "red" roof tiles. The Board suggested that they would also consider
a roof tile in some shade of slate blue with a flat finish. The Board discussed
landscaping, parking space, and trash enclosure relocation. Also, the
applicant was instructed to provide a light standard within the parking lot
which matches the Bank of America standards. The Board instructed the applicant
to verify that finished parking lot grade would be compatible with that of the
parking lot grade to the west.
On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board moved to continue this
case for restudy, incorporating the following items:
1. Relocate trash enclosure to extreme northerly parking area, with pedestrian
access provided to trash enclosure, and with landscaping provided around
the enclosure area.
2. Provide additional planter between buildings adjacent to E1 Paseo
property line.
3. Provide 14 parking spaces and apply for parking adjustment; adjustment
to be approved prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. Show sign program on architectural elevations.
` 5. Submit alternate roof tile color.
6. Provide light standard to match fixtures used in Bank of America parking lot.
7. Provide verification that parking lot grade will meet grade of
property to west.
8. That a 5 ft. wide planter shall be provided adjacent to the easterly
property line, adjacent to the parking spaces.
9. Provide for undergrounding of utilities from proposed building to
power pole.
10. Submit revised final landscaping plan, showing all tree and shrub
species, locations and sizes.
carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Urrutia).
Case N 367 SA - SUNSHINE MEAT, FISH AND LIQUOR COMPANY - Revised restaurant
identifi tion sign for location at 73-986 Highway 111. Applicant was not
present.
The Board dishupsed the work that has been done to the existing sign. The
Board felt the the white portion of the boat should be repainted to an
earthen color.
On a motion by Jackso , seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the revised
sign, subject to the f lowing modification:
That the white portion of he boat shall be painted a color ranging from
tan to brown; color to be a roved by Staff prior to painting.
carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson Leung, Urrutia).
4
SIGN CRITERIA
1. All signs shall be wood signs 18" high by 22" thick. Signs shall not
exceed 60% of the width of the leased premises nor be more than 16' long.
No sign shall be less than 4' long.
2. Sign shall be kiln dried, rough sawn, clear heart redwood with flat grain
exposed. Recessed areas shall be sandblasted ," deep. Sign shall be
treated with woodlife preservative; areas to receive color to be painted
with acrylic paint.
3. Letter style, size and color shall be as indicated on drawings.
4. Signs shall be mounted on wood beam at the front of the store as
indicated on the drawings above. No other location is permitted without
written permission from owner.
5. No signs on windows or walls of the building shall be allowed except
as noted. No flashing or rotating signs will be allowed.
6. Small carved wood wall signs or permanent painted window signs shall be
allowed only with specific written approval by owner of design and location.
C1S
11
CITY OF
PP- S DECER
E�1'rlr. IF'
NO.
CASE iVq
P -.
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION
CASE NO.: 109 C
REPORT ON:
LOCATION: North side of E1 Paseo, between Sage and Lupine Lanes
ZONE: C-1, S.P.
APPLICANT: Harold McCormick for R. G. Chan Gunn
NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final construction plans for coimiercial structure
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION:
Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the
staff and by the applicant, the Design Review Board
CONTINUED this project, subject to revisions...:.: _..
Date of Action: May 8, 1979
Vote:
(An appeal of -the above action may be made in writing to the City
Clerk of the City.of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the
date of the decision.)
,STAFF COMMENTS:
See attached Minutes.
Minutes Page Two
Palm Desert Design M w Board
May 8, 1979
III. (cunt.)
Case No. 109 C - HAROID MC CORMICK FOR R. G. CHAN GUNN - Final construction
plans for commercial structure, located on the north side of E1 Paseo,
between Sage and Lupine Lanes. Applicant was present.
The Board reviewed the final construction plans submitted by the applicant.
The applicant submitted a sign program sample, and was instructed to show the
sign on the building elevation plans. The applicant also submitted samples of
alternate "red" roof tiles. The Board suggested that they would also consider
a roof tile in some shade of slate blue with a flat finish. The Board discussed
landscaping, parking space, and trash enclosure relocation. Also, the
applicant was instructed to provide a light standard within the parking lot
which matches the Bank of America, standards. The Board instructed the applicant
to verify that finished parking lot grade would be compatible with that of the
parking lot grade to the west.
On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Jackson, the Board moved to continue this
case for restudy, incorporating the following items:
1. Relocate trash enclosure to extreme northerly parking area, with pedestrian
access provided to trash enclosure, and with landscaping provided around
the enclosure area.
2. Provide additional planter between buildings adjacent to El Paseo
property line.
3. Provide 14 parking spaces and apply for parking adjustment; adjustment
to be approved prior to issuance of a building permit.
4. Show sign program on architectural elevations.
5. Submit alternate roof tile color.
6. Provide light standard to match fixtures used in Bank of America parking lot.
7. Provide verification that parking lot grade will meet grade of
property to west.
8. That a 5 ft. wide planter shall be provided adjacent to the easterly
property line, adjacent to the parking spaces.
9. Provide for undergrounding of utilities from proposed building to
power pole.
10. Submit revised final landscaping plan, showing all tree and shrub
species, locations and sizes.
carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Urrutia).
Case No. 367 SA - SUNSHINE MEAT, FISH AND LIQUOR OCWANY - Revised restaurant
identification sign for location at 73-986 Highway 111. Applicant was not
present.
The Board discussed the work that has been done to the existing sign. The
Board felt that the white portion of the boat should be repainted to an
earthen color.
On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the revised
sign, subject to the following modification:
That the white portion of the boat shall be painted a color ranging from
tan to brown; color to be approved by Staff prior to painting.
carried 4-0 (Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Urrutia).
1
n
f I qY 0 81979
�:1TY CF f'A_::I L�fi_RT
0 81979
LNYliwi�..,...., nL oautiiCcS
CITY OF PALYI DESERT
l
DATE May 8, 1979
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CASE NO. 109 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Harold McCormick for R. G. Gunn,
46-860 Amir. Palm Desert
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Final construction and landscaping
plans for commercial structure
LOCATION North side of E1 Paseo. between Sage and Lupine Lanes
ZONE C-1. S.P.
Preliminary approval was granted by the Board February 20, 1979. The
Planning Commission approved the action of the Board at its meeting of
February 27, 1979. The Planning Commission modified one condition of
the Board. The Board requirement for the front setback was 15 ft.
The Planning Commission modified it to read "A greater front setback
of 10 ft. shall be required to accommodate proposed elevation treatment"
The construction drawings are not in compliance with preliminary approval
in the following areas:
1. A final sign program has not been submitted.
2. An alternate roof tile color to the original glazed blue tile
has not been indicated.
3. The revised plan previously submitted to staff which reflected the
Design Review Board changes indicated 14 parking spaces. The final
plans which have been submitted show 12 parking spaces, which
is 4 spaces short from the 16 spaces required for the 3,930 sq. ft.
structure. (Note: An Adjustment of 10% of the required parking,
or 1.6 or 1 space for this project can be filed for. If an Adjustment
is approved, the applicant can provide 15 spaces. It appears that
15 spaces can be provided, with the trash relocated.)
4. A portion of the previously shown parking lot landscaping has
been deleted.
5. The submitted landscape plan does not indicate parkway planting or
street trees and does not provide an adequate variety and number of
shrubs, and ground cover.
6. Provide tree and/or shrubs and ground cover in planter on private
property near or adjacent to E1 Paseo property line in the area
between buildings, unless placement of street trees is such that a
tree is not necessary in said planter.
7. Provide information to verify that proposed parking lot grade
will meet that of property to west.
8. Provision for undergrounding of overhead utilities.
9. Provision for parking lot lighting which conforms to approved
design for the area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Continue final construction drawing and
landscape drawing approval until compliance with previous conditions
and items as stated above are submitted.
Minutes
Palm Desert Planning Commission
February 27, 1979
IX. DESIGN REVIEW-1QARD ITEMS
Consideration of the c-hii.Q
at their regularly schedu
Page Eight
reviewed by the Design Review Board
cl meeting of February 20, 1979.
_ Mr. Williams noted at this time at Case No. 108 C was
inadvertently added to the Resolution; it s not approved at the
Design Review Board meeting, but continued.
Mr. Crump then reviewed the cases (166 MF and �10C�for the
Commission, noting that the applicant for Case No. 166as supplied
a revised site plan, which appears to address those concerns expressed
by the Design Review Board. He also noted that Staff is recommending
one revision to the Design Review Board recommendations for
Case No. 109 C, as follows: Change Design Review Board recommendation
No. 6 under "Plot Plan" to read: "A greater front setback of 10 feet
shall be required to accommodate proposed elevation treatment". The
previous recommendation was for 15 feet. It was explained that this
recommendation was based on a subsequent design study of the parcels
along this section of E1 Paseo.
On a motion by Commissioner Fleshman, seconded by Commissioner
Snyder, the Design Review Board actions of their meeting of February 20,
1979, we a approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 468, as
amended, delete 108 C and amend 109 C; carried unanimously (4-0).
X.
DISCL%SION ITEMS_- None
ORAL COM%NICATIONS - None
COMMENTS
A. City- None
B. City Attorn4 -.Not present
C. Planning Comm1psioners
Chairman Kelly indi ated that because she will be moving
out of the City of Palm Dese t, this would be her last Planning Commission
meeting. Each Commissioner i dividually stated their appreciation to
Mrs. Kelly for her involvemen in the Planning Commission.
A resolution of the P1
Desert, California, commending
of concerned service to the co
Commission member and Chairman
ng Commission of the City of Palm
ria Kelly for her nearly three years
ity in the capacity of Planning
,presented to Mrs. Kelly.
On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner
Fleshman, Planning Commission Resolu ion No. 469 was approved as
presented; carried 3-0-1 (AYES: FleshAnan, Kryder, Snyder; ABSENT: Berkey).
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Commissioner Kr
Snyder, the meeting was adjourned at 9
ATTEST:
, seconded by Commissioner
p.m.
ary
/ss
Minutes
Palm Desert Design Review Board
February 20, 1979
Page Four
III. Zkse No. 166 MF (cont.)
XReplac
entry planter (may include dwarf Natal Plum and Crepe
kle).
portions of graveled areas with low plantings.
6. Provide concre driveway.
7. Designate air condi inning pad locations.
8. Designate pool equipme%of
ions.
Building Elevations
1. Provide alternate shadcco color (suggest lighter color).
carried 4-0 (Johnson, Jackson, Urrutia, Williams).
Case No. 109 C - R. H. RICCIARDI, A.I.A. FOR DR. R. G. GUN - Preliminary
site plan and elevations for a commercial structure and related parking, to
be located north of E1 Paseo, east of Sage Lane. Applicant not present.
Board discussed the preliminary site plan and elevations for the corrmercial
building. Subjects discussed were features of the plot plan, parking lot
design, and building elevations and color of materials.
On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the pre-
liminary plan, subject to the following revisions:
Plot Plan
1. Parking lot shall be redesigned to conform to adjacent lot to the west.
Parking shall begin approximately 126 feet northerly of E1 Paseo.
2. Trash enclosure shall be redesigned.
3. Building shall be stepped down.
4. The cross-section of the project shall be provided as a part of the
final construction drawings.
5. Proposed parking lot lights shall conform to approved design for the area.
6. A greater front setback of 15 feet shall be required to accoranodate
proposed elevation treatment.
7. Applicant will be responsible for undergrounding existing overhead
utilities.
8. Revised landscape treatment plan for front and center area (containing
permanent planting) to be suimitted with final construction drawings.
9._ Ficus Retusa .shall be upgraded to 20 inch box size.
Building Elevations
1. Final construction drawings shall include an acceptable Sign Program.
2. Submit alternate color for roof tile.
Iv. DINUSSION IMIS .
1. Case No. P 02-79 and CZ 03-79 - BALEEN/MCFARLAND, INC. FOR E. GEORGE
MARZICOLA. Applicant was present.
The Board revi a complete set of preliminary development plans for the
proposed 682-unit c dommium development and 12-acre shopping center site.
The applicant discuss these plans with the Board. The Board found the
development concept to be enerally acceptable and had no further design input
to offer Staff or the Commission.
Minutes Page Four
Palm Desert Design Review Board
February 20, 1979
III. Case No. 166 MF (cont.)
E. Upgrade entry planter (may include dwarf Natal Plum and Crepe
Honeysuckle).
F. Replace portions of graveled areas with low plantings.
6. Provide concrete driveway.
7. Designate air conditioning pad locations.
8. Designate pool equipment locations.
Building Elevations
1. Provide alternate shade of stucco color (suggest lighter color).
/ carried 4-0 (Johnson, Jackson, Urrutia, Williams).
JCase No. 109 C - R. H. RICCIARDI, A.I.A. FOR DR. R. G. GUN - Preliminary
site plan and elevations for a commercial structure and related parking, to
be located north of E1 Paseo, east of Sage Lane. Applicant not present.
Board discussed the preliminary site plan and elevations for the coTnercial
building. Subjects discussed were features of the plot plan, parking lot
design, and building elevations and color of materials.
On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the pre-
liminary plan, subject to the following revisions:
Plot Plan
1. Parking lot shall be redesigned to conform to adjacent lot to the west.
Parking shall begin approximately 126 feet northerly of E1 Paseo.
2. Trash enclosure shall be redesigned.
3. Building shall be stepped down.
4. The cross-section of the project shall be provided as a part of the
final construction drawings.
5. Proposed parking lot lights shall conform to approved design for the area.
6. A greater front setback of 15 feet shall be required to accommodate
proposed elevation treatment.
7. Applicant will be responsible for undergrounding existing overhead
utilities.
8. Revised landscape treatment plan for front and center area (containing
permanent planting) to be submitted with final construction drawings.
9. Ficus Retusa shall be upgraded to 20 inch box size.
Building Elevations
1. Final construction drawings shall include an acceptable Sign Program.
2. Submit alternate color for roof tile.
IV. DISCUSSION IMIS
1. Case No. DP 02-79 and CZ 03-79 - BALLEW/MCFARLAND, INC. FOR E. GEORGE
. MARZICOLA. Applicant was present.
The Board reviewed a complete set of preliminary development plans for the
proposed 682-unit condominium development and 12-acre shopping center site.
The applicant discussed these plans with the Board. The Board found the
development concept to be generally acceptable and had no further design input
to offer Staff or the Cocmission.
Minutes Page Eight
Palm Desert Planning Commission
February 27, 1979
IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS
Consideration of the cases reviewed by the Design Review Board
at their regularly scheduled meeting of February 20, 1979.
Mr. Williams noted at this time that Case No. 108 C was
inadvertently added to the Resolution; it was not approved at the
Design Review Board meeting, but continued.
Mr. Crump then reviewed the cases (166 MF and 109 C for the
Commission, noting that the applicant for Case No. 166 as supplied
a revised site plan, which appears to address those concerns expressed
by the Design Review Board. He also noted that Staff is recommending
one revision to the Design Review Board recommendations for
Case No. 109 C, as follows: Change Design Review Board recommendation
No. 6 under "Plot Plan" to read: "A greater front setback of 10 feet
shall be required to accommodate proposed elevation treatment". The
previous recommendation was for 15 feet. It was explained that this
recommendation was based on a subsequent design study of the parcels
along this section of E1 Paseo.
On a motion by Commissioner Fleshman, seconded by Commissioner
Snyder, the Design Review Board actions of their meeting of February 20,
1979, were approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 468, as
amended, to delete 108 C and amend 109 C; carried unanimously (4-0).
X. DISCUSSION ITEMS - None
XI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None
XII. COMMENTS
A. City Staff - None
B. City Attorney - Not present
C. Planning Commissioners
Chairman Kelly indicated that because she will be moving
out of the City of Palm Desert, this would be her last Planning Commission
meeting. Each Commissioner individually stated their appreciation to
Mrs. Kelly for her involvement in the Planning Commission.
A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm
Desert, California, commending Gloria Kelly for her nearly three years
of concerned service to the community in the capacity of Planning
Commission member and Chairman was presented to Mrs. Kelly.
On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner
Fleshman, Planning Commission Resolution No. 469 was approved as
presented; carried 3-0-1 (AYES: Fleshman, Kryder, Snyder; ABSENT: Berkey).
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner
Snyder, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
ATTEST:
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary
/ss
(K:5�t:a�Zpm oil jFffiIlrUa
45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE March 1. 1979
APPLICANT R.H. Ricciardi, A.I.A. for Dr. R.G. Gun
CASE NO.:
73-700 Highway 111
Palm Desert, CA 92260
109 C
The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request
and taken the following action at its meeting of
February 27, 1979
CONTINUED
DENIED
X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 468
PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION DECISION.
PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
PUBLIC HEARING.
Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental
Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY
PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION
cc: Applicant
C.V.0 W.D.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 468
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING
FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ACTIONS OF FEBRUARY 20, 1979.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert,
California, did review the Design Review Board actions of February 20,
1979, approving:
Case No. 166MF - Request for approval of preliminary site
plan and elevations for a duplex for
O. HOLMBERG AND J. J. TONER:
Case No. 109C - Request for approval of preliminary site
plan and elevations for a commercial
structure and related parking for R.H. RICCIARDI,
A.I.A. FOR DR. R. G. GUN.
WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring
to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to
exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of February 20, 1979.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and
constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases;
2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board
actions of February 20, 1979, with the following
modification:
Case 109C - Change Design Review Board recommendation
No. 6 under "Plot Plan" to read: "A greater
front setback of 10 feet shall be required to
accommodate proposed elevation treatment."
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm
Desert Planning Commission, held on this 27th day of February, 1979,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: KELLY, KRYDER, FLESHMAN, SNYDER
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: BERKEY
ABSTAIN: NONE
GLORIA KELLY, Chairman
ATTEST:
PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary
/ss
0
Agenda Item No. III - 11
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
DATE February 20, 1979
CASE NO.: 109 C
APPLICANT: R.H. Ricciardi, A.I.A. for Dr. R.G. Gun
LOCATION: North of El Paseo, east of Sage Lane
ZONING: C-1- S -P
-
Preliminary site plan and elevations for 3900 sq. ft. commercial building.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve, subject to the following revisions:
1. Parking lot shall be redesigned to conform to adjacent lots
to the west. Parking shall begin approximately 126 ft. northerly
of E1 Paseo
2. Trash enclosure shall be redesigned
3. Building shall be stepped
4. A cross-section of the project shall be provided as -a part
of the final construction drawings
5. Proposed parking lot lights shall conform to approved design
for area
6. A greater front setback, 10' - 15', shall be required to
accommodate proposed elevation treatment
7. Applicant will be responsible for undergrounding existing
overhead utilities
Building Elevations
Final construction drawings shall include an acceptable Sign Program
/09G
Robert H. Ricciardi & Assoc,
73-700 Highway 111
Palm Desert, Ca. 92260
Hryw .ZI
,LII
-HNW 'rd0 �0 dN3!
y I
8.� en
A �
C s�Cd '�I}J1�a'1�05
i�i/�i• I � :b7s �jJ,
fry ON
1��
t
ljJ
W EES-• EI EVATIOfi
50UTH ELEVATION
OWNFIZ: PC u CWAN OUNN
ie,I 1':A jMCNVS AV& VANG(�BC,p.G (AHAAA
I-✓?7 7''si <W5 WJ 2T4
DF%Ji!n`IE2: Q7?eY. :�. Q:L'AF;i^I AIA L A-f.Y..lA1Tfi
T-'Z : ri-NAY 1:1 ?A:.`: v"s�RT,CT- A22W
.li ' 12
V' f FIlA/.: Ti:.SG
'hti;.'-a..'•7 `r•!i`w 'A"�Iv'T-F ChTi `i:-I��A4�
! cCla e_IV
CIL,
1,
_ .
EAST ELEVATION
=t.00R ? AN
ate_. M•-O`
4�.
1
.._err.
u•+T
�.
o
v,
4%
x-Z
e� vwsm
���ZM v�'�Na✓N
f4SXIA3a
ZIZZ • 917E VINiAO31IVO 1113S30 WIHd 111 AVAAHJIH OOL• EL
s:ff.Lvi3ossv 2? •v • a •v
ICIUV1a3IU 'H Ja131REK0U
Y')
�� r.y I�i} �,...,� �,�:.-fir` •� •`'i' �I
103road
c
W
m
o
W 7
Q
-j ,
Q
CL
a
❑
y
❑
Q
0
Z
LU
W
W
�1
I Il�lb I I
F1
I
� tl
�r
`J
sue'"
lli
r U�
4 vA- yl
toLL
4
—r'
c
OC Q
'I
n
Lu
ILI
=Z J
u�--
- - --
Zp
WP�J
� 1
N
X
tp
ti-
-
t �V.L�J�?I -
L
Z
Z
t�
d
4I l\
i
tll ll
I
- T
1p
�
1
����s�4�
I�
R
r
Vvf
I
=o I
1 i
�
t
�
�3
'f
L_
u
w�I
Fes. i3♦
_ C� _
-� —
f
`�i
N
i
�2
�S\l
�T
Z
_TIA
NA-
L
x.
_
JUSNOISIA
ZIZZ • 9bE VINU0311VO lH3S34 VYIVd 1 11 AHAAHOIH OOL• CL
s:RsvlaOssv 21? °v ' I 'V
IQHV I33 I U e H S11: :9 g0H
iO3r0ad
!j
a�
o
}
>
W
m
0
w=
Q y
Q ,
OC
a
0
z
LU
W
W
x
U)
,
7S
o
T- r
6L
s1A
--T
T
LL
1f� 7- d -7
LA
r,
I
I
T
Z
�
41
I �r'C_'C7❑ _�'��1� _ � b � �
4 -
T
St n �yc�
EL d 1
sds S'd4:�
r—
r
Lj
0
z
_ i I
,
-77
T-}
I
�-
I.. _ 1. = � --� ,r., , I F- � r� F -- � r--✓,� �,,� Cam..,{ -
r 1 is
e.
.3 L' o I
•
Tl
J.
a — rn I w
n�^-s cs I I
' I
4 I
0 M. lr
i
4I
0
I
I
I
;
I Q
I
,
1
i
1
:yam'
tLIN$
-�
N
t5-TIT
/
Q
-
T
e�
=•��-4
VQS
-3 ia�_
0
Z