Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout112C CHARLES GIBBSI ]Y PARKING SPACES COOK-57REE3 -- " x lIdXNJu11tlx:Alol>v>,, .I NOTES, �1 .�`� a..,xtlWJWIUK l�1LLAIW )IJnIJXA15.IF1>II4 i r a oLJ o tL 0 0I 10 ol 100 .`r❑ 00 0 0 0 0 G �`—tY/5T.-6'".,tuMP BLP:k NIHtL CIA, MOL4wN PIVF) _ . flours/pE wALc � 1 �i 11 t s 1 y' z � •'P, y �' � �.. dare t � � r> rr % > 1, y«'. WE PLAM runr amm�nu: CoinnagR a'axri�aru rw w I nwlm mwn lnn nlu'nl vannlnvnsmv 'u assvrnYle<n+vrunrAr. Flm nr mleu vN ,. ;��i ���`r 01 a nnnl lm vm snu m�s ux lMmiss 'sae 3NN4Y 'f 'F IIII SI I'M An N.l'Md11R lrIMwlml Ar�.N 10 'N 11�ld sf # wl „NarAAY �i. w. aso Iwrw 'sNnnnrslmulRl nx nlSp AM)Ibrl t�l,��j �I Ij Ir fiYM W6r9e1f1112Y'IFNIM1FTPm NIIr TM r 1W 16y II IJnlIMr51'NINAry 1nllYplfpM.I4p5 y�� '!M IIII TIe WI4 UY b!IM �� ��k6�• aiMn'n4Y (i}ryryt nlPTJrf YmIYYnFYI�'Y x n. �.�r.. 'tl tlMl�Nll i�", .ter ^ INRmIINI yryn 1 On ptlnlm 'S310N 'IN,l $3'JYM 9NIMtive at gImTT irbTltll .l.T I 1!MM Ae9 '1 1�\Y MmRN m`P LJ 11 U J 1I LLLLIJ ILI nm NnM nLNM Lnlrylp'I MITI mI SI 1tFL '1 W, C � _� > �f� �Y. L . _ �� yS .^� Yc �ti - ��' N I M1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES MAY 11, 1982 CONDITIONS FOR CASE NO. 234 MF (CONTINUED) 2. That the groundcover be identified in the back. 3. That an evergreen or semi -evergreen tree be used instead of Crape Myrtles. Motion carried unanimously 6-0. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS / CASE NO. 112 C - CHARLES GIBBS, Applicant. b Mr. Diaz indicated that Mr. Gibbs had sent him a letter requesting that he be permitted to substitute the Dwarf Salmon Oleanders for Prostrate Junipers on the landscaping of his mini -storage building located at the northeast corner of 42nd Avenue and Eclectic Street.. It was the concensus of the Board that Mr. Gibbs' request be granted on condition that the Junipers be spaced a minimum of four feet on center. V. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Mr. Holden, seconded by Mr. Cook, the meeting adjourned at 2:05 p.m. Motion carried unanimously 6-0. /pa - 3 - STE E SMITH, Associate Planner G$'lur o:ff 2=)aP=c=V(20 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: February 2, 1982 CHARLES GIBBS 70-673 Oroville Circle Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 CASE NO: 112 C The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of February 2, 1982. APPROVED BY ADOPTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 780 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Dessert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. F j i ry`f r ✓ � RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr CC: CVWD File A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 780 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION AT ITS MEETING OF JANUARY 26, 1982. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of January 26, 1982, approving: CASE NO. 112 C (AMENDMENT) - Preliminary and final plans to add a mini storage building to an existing facility at the northeast corner of 42nd Avenue and Eclectic Street (private) for CHARLES GIBBS. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board action of January 26, 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of January 26, 1982. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 2nd day of February, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, KRYDER, MILLER, RICHARDS, WOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 2, 1982 amended ordinance to include Sections 25.04.108 (Bachelor or Studio Apartments) and 25.56.320 A (1) (Minimum Residential Structure Size); he was opposed to Section 25.76.120 (Relocation of Legal Nonconforming Units). Chairman Kryder wished to continue the whole matter until a joint session with City Council can be arranged for review. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to continue Section 25.04.108 (Bachelor or Studio Apts); continue Section 25.56.320 (Minimum Residential Structure Size) indefinitely to permit discussion with Council; and, deny Section 25.76.120 (Relocation of Legal Nonconforming Units). Carried unanimously 5-0. vIII. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Preliminary plan approvals by the Design Review Board at its meeting of January 26, 1982, requiring Planning Commission confirmation. 1� A. I Case No. 112 C - CHARLES GIBBS - Preliminary and final approval to add a // mini -storage building to an existing facility located at the northeast corner of 42nd Avenue and Eclectic Street. Mr. Smith reviewed the plans and recommended approval. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Miller, to approve Design Review Board's action by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 780. Carried unanimously 5-0. B. Case No. 159 C - T.G.I. FRIDAYS, INC. - Preliminary approval of plans for a restaurant building including usage of red and white awnings. Mr. Smith stated that because Commission had some concern about the red and white awning this matter was continued from the last meeting for further study. Staff recommended approval. MR. TOM HOOLIHAN, Applicant, was present and gave a brief presentation and distributed pictures of existing restaurants. He explained that the awning is a trademark of the restaurant. After reviewing the site and information presented by the applicant the Commission felt the plans were acceptable. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to approve the Design Review Board's action for 159 C by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 781. Carried unanimously 5-0. IX. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS - NONE X. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - NONE XI. COMMENTS Mr. Diaz reviewed items presented to City Council: A. Amusement Arcades (Straw Hat) - City Council instructed staff to define arcades and prepare an Ordinance regulating their use; staff prepared report defining 3 or more machines would constitute arcade. B. Hillside Overlay - City Council recommended a joint meeting with Planning Commission on this matter. Meeting will be set. C. Subdivision Ordinance revisions - staff is proceeding with proposed amendments. -4- AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-2 DATE: January 26, 1982 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO: 112C (Amendment) APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CHARLES GIBBS, 70-673 Oroville Circle, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval to add a mini -storage building to an existing facility. LOCATION: Northeast corner of 42nd Avenue and Eclectic Street (private). ZONE: S.I. S.P. DISCUSSION: This application was before the Board at its January 12, 1982 meeting. At that time Staff advised the Board that the applicant had requested a continuance. In the interim, additional plans (structural details) have been provided. The applicant verbally advised Staff of some measures he proposed to improve the site. Rather than outline the applicant's intentions here, it is suggested that the Board have the applicant explain his proposed actions. Attached is a copy of the January 12, 1982 staff report. /pa AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-3 DATE: January 12, 1982 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO: 112C (Amendment) APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Charles Gibbs, 70-673 Oroville Circle, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval to add a mini storage building to an existing facility. LOCATION: Northeast corner of 42nd Avenue and Eclectic Street (private). ZONE: S.I. SP BACKGROUND: This application was previously presented to the Board at its meeting of April 28, 1981, at which time the applicant requested and received an indefinite adjournment. The applicant now requests that the Board review the application. A copy of the April 28, 1981 staff report is attached. The major concern at that time was the lack of landscaping and maintenance thereof. A recent visit to the site indicated the existence of landscaping materials. Most of the landscaping appeared to be alive although some at the north end appeared to have died. The real problem involved the lack of maintenance. Along the west wall, bunches of desert scrub were jammed into the wall resulting in an unattractive appearance. Basically, it is felt that the applicant should be requested to hire a landscape maintenance firm to maintain the site. In addition, there is no ground cover provided in the landscape areas. The Fire Marshal was consulted regarding the installation of water lines and indicated that it was his understanding that the lines have been installed although they have not been entirely completed. STAFF ANALYSIS: As delineated in the April 28, 1981 report, Staff does not object to the approval of the additional building and vehicle storage area. However, considering the problem of the maintenance of the landscaping, Staff would recommend that only preliminary approval be granted and that the applicant provide a final landscaping and irrigation plan to be submitted to the Board with the final working drawings. Staff recommends that if the Board approves this application, that the following conditions be imposed: I. Approval to be preliminary only. 2. That a landscape plan be submitted indicating appropriate ground cover for the landscaped areas as well as replacement of dead materials and intensification of landscape materials along the south side of the vehicle storage area. 3. That the applicant enter into an agreement with a suitable landscape maintenance firm to provide continuous maintenance to the landscape areas in perpetuity and provide a copy of the agreement to the Director of Environmental Services for his approval. 4. Final working drawings not to be submitted to Department of Building and Safety until water lines and fire suppression facilities as required by City Fire Marshal are installed and certified. 5. Final plans to show Coachella Valley TV fence location in relation to north property line of subject site. I Continued... /pa 6. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupance shall be issued until completed. - 2 - _'N ITEM NO. III, B-3 DATE April 28, 1981 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 112 C (Amendment) APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) CHARLES GIBBS (70-673 Oroville Circle, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary and final approval to add mini -storage building to existing facility. LOCATION Northeast corner of 42nd Avenue and Eclectic Street (private) ZONE S.I., S.P. The applicant wishes to add a 30 foot by 220 foot mini -storage building to an existing facility. This would be Phase III, with Phase I consisting of six buildings (A-F) and Phase II consisting of three buildings (G-I). The applicant is also askinq for approval of a 24 foot by 40 foot addition to building E (Phase I). However, no plans have been submitted. Additionally, approximately 12 new outdoor storage vehicle spaces are proposed east of the new building. An obvious fact upon inspecting the site is that maintenance of the landscaping is non-existent. While there are some trees and shrubs the majority of the landscaping consists of sand and native growth (weeds). The storage building will match the other buildings in color, materials and architectural style. There will only be doors on the south side of the building to facilitate storage of boats. The perimeter fencing and landscaping along the north property line will be relocated further to the north to facilitate the proposed construction. The Coachella Valley TV site to the north presently has a fence along the common boundary between the two uses. Therefore, it may only be necessary to replace the landscaping. The Fire Marshal has voiced a concern that water lines required by previous approvals have not yet been installed as promised. Therefore, fire flow is not adequate to protect the developed properties. Staff has been informed by the applicant the contract to do the installation has been let, but work has not yet begun. Staff recommends that the final plans not be submitted to Building and Safety Department until the work has been completed. This will insure compliance. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff recommends that prior to any final DRB approval, a complete landscape plan for the entire site be submitted to the Board for approval. The landscaping is completely unacceptable and a poor example for the first industrial facility built in the City of Palm Desert. Staff recommends that if the Board approves this that the following conditions be imposed: 1. Approval to be preliminary only. 2. A final landscaping and irrigation plan for the entire site to be submitted to the Board with the final working drawings; plans to show all existing and proposed landscaping with areas outside perimeter wall to be planted with bermuda lawn and trees. (over) 3. Final working drawings not to be submitted to Department of Building and Safety until water lines and fire suppression facilities as required by City Fire Marshal are installed. 4. Final plans to show Coachella Valley TV fence location in relation to north property line of subject site. 5. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. Should the Board feel these plans are acceptable, Staff will forward your approval with conditions to the Planning Commission for confirmation. 0 0 r 1 * , 2 1 0 0 3 1 I a 4� TOWN 44 Ict-i ing, as a:go-'- L J 14' I-I+1 t i-I_HI _ N ". 1] AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-3 DATE: January 12, 1982 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO: 112C (Amendment) APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Charles Gibbs, 70-673 Oroville Circle, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval to add a mini storage building to an existing facility. LOCATION: Northeast corner of 42nd Avenue and Eclectic Street (private). ZONE: S.I. SP BACKGROUND: This application was previously presented to the Board at its meeting of April 28, 1981, at which time the applicant requested and received an indefinite adjournment. The applicant now requests that the Board review the application. A copy of the April 28, 1981 staff report is attached. The major concern at that time was the lack of landscaping and maintenance thereof. A recent visit to the site indicated the existence of landscaping materials. Most of the landscaping appeared to be alive although some at the north end appeared to have died. The real problem involved the lack of maintenance. Along the west wall, bunches of desert scrub were jammed into the wall resulting in an unattractive appearance. Basically, it is felt that the applicant should be requested to hire a landscape maintenance firm to maintain the site. In addition, there is no ground cover provided in the landscape areas. The Fire Marshal was consulted regarding the installation of water lines and indicated that it was his understanding that the lines have been installed although they have not been entirely completed. STAFF ANALYSIS: As delineated in the April 28, 1981 report, Staff does not object to the approval of the additional building and vehicle storage area. However, considering the problem of the maintenance of the landscaping, Staff would recommend that only preliminary approval be granted and that the applicant provide a final landscaping and irrigation plan to be submitted to the Board with the final working drawings. Staff recommends that if the Board approves this application, that the following conditions be imposed: I. Approval to be preliminary only 2. That a landscape plan be submitted indicating appropriate ground cover for the landscaped areas as well as replacement of dead materials and intensification of landscape materials along the south side of the vehicle storage area. 3. That the applicant enter into an agreement with a suitable landscape maintenance firm to provide continuous maintenance to the landscape areas in perpetuity and provide a copy of the agreement to the Director of Environmental Services for his approval. 4. Final working drawings not to be submitted to Department of Building and Safety until water lines and fire suppression facilities as required by City Fire Marshal are installed and certified. 5. Final plans to show Coachella Valley TV fence location in relation to north property line of subject site. I Continued... /pa 6. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupance shall be issued until completed. - 2 - _'NDA ITEM NO. III, B-3 DATE April 28, 1981 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 112 C (Amendment) APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) CHARLES GIBBS (70-673 Oroville Circle, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary and final approval to add mini -storage building to existing facility. LOCATION Northeast corner of 42nd Avenue and Eclectic Street (private) ZONE S.I., S.P. The applicant wishes to add a 30 foot by 220 foot mini -storage building to an existing facility. This would be Phase III, with Phase I consisting of six buildings (A-F) and Phase II consisting of three buildings (G-I). The applicant is also askinq for approval of a 24 foot by 40 foot addition to building E (Phase I). However, no plans have been submitted. Additionally, approximately 12 new outdoor storage vehicle spaces are proposed east of the new building. An obvious fact upon inspecting the site is that maintenance of the landscaping is non-existent. While there are some trees and shrubs the majority of the landscaping consists of sand and native growth (weeds). The storage building will match the other buildings in color, materials and architectural style. There will only be doors on the south side of the building to facilitate storage of boats. The perimeter fencing and landscaping along the north property line will be relocated further to the north to facilitate the proposed construction. The Coachella Valley TV site to the north presently has a fence along the common boundary between the two uses. Therefore, it may only be necessary to replace the landscaping. The Fire Marshal has voiced a concern that water lines required by previous approvals have not yet been installed as promised. Therefore, fire flow is not adequate to protect the developed properties. Staff has been informed by the applicant the contract to do the installation has been let, but work has not yet begun. Staff recommends that the final plans not be submitted to Building and Safety Department until the work has been completed. This will insure compliance. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff recommends that prior to any final DRB approval, a complete landscape plan for the entire site be submitted to the Board for approval. The landscaping is completely unacceptable and a poor example for the first industrial facility built in the City of Palm Desert. Staff recommends that if the Board approves this that the following conditions be imposed: 1. Approval to be preliminary only. 2. A final landscaping and irrigation plan for the entire site to be submitted to the Board with the final working drawings; plans to show all existing and proposed landscaping with areas outside perimeter wall to be planted with bermuda lawn and trees. (over) 3. Final working drawings not to be submitted to Department of Building and Safety until water lines and fire suppression facilities as required by City Fire Marshal are installed. 4. Final plans to show Coachella Valley TV fence location in relation to north property line of subject site. 5. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. Should the Board feel these plans are acceptable, Staff will forward your approval with conditions to the Planning Commission for confirmation. 00 0 o II LlI. .:WW 111S WWI.. 2]'Jrlt MIXtlN 21 4. W'm m IT oil TF8a nn IlD®=�rnt�P 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION Case No: 112 C (Amendment) Applicant: Charles Gibbs (70-673 Oroville Circle, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270) Nature of Project/Approval Sought: Preliminary and final approval to add mini building to existing facility. Location: Northeast corner of 42nd Avenue and Eclectic Street (private) Zone: S.I., S.P. The Board was advised of the applicant's request for an indefinite postponement of this case. The Board concurred with the requested postponement. Date of Action: April 28, 1981 MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING PAGE THREE 1. That a patio cover should be installed over the south facing sliding glass door, in order to reduce direct sun infiltration. 2. That the 4 Pepper trees proposed in the yards adjacent to the streets should be specified as 2, with minimum 15 gallon size, and 2 with minimum 24" box. 3. That the names of all plants be delineated on the plan. 4. That construction plans be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 5. That the revisions to the landscape plan as suggested by the Board and noted on the landscape plan, be implemented. Motion carried unanimously 5-0 i CASE NO. 112 C (AMENDMENT) - CHARLES GIBBS - Preliminary and final �apprava1 t"s ad mini storage building to existing facility at the north- east corner of 42nd Avenue and Ecletic Street (private). Mr. Sawa said that the applicant has requested that this matter be postponed indefinitely. The Board concurred with the requested postponement. CASE NO. 146 C - A-1 SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING - Preliminary approval for commercial building at 74-300 Highway 111 (north side of Highway 111, west of Las Palmas); Charles Martin was present. Mr. Martin highlighted the proposed development and said that the required shading of the south facing glass would be further detailed in the working drawings. He concurred with the landscaping comment contained in the staff report. Mr. Cook noted that the handicap parking space may have to be relocated in order to conform with State requirements. On a motion by Cook, seconded by Gregory, the Board approved this request subject to the following conditions: 1. That adequate protection be provided for the glass area on the south side of the building. 2. That the landscaping plan be revised to specify 1 tree of minimum 36" box and the two other trees be minimum 24" box. 3. That construction plans be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 4. That final construction drawings, including a final landscaping grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the afore- mentioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. Motion carried 4-0-1 (with Martin abstaining) NDA ITEM NO. III, B-3 DATE April 28, 1981 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 112 C (Amendment) APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) CHARLES GIBBS (70-673 Oroville Circle, Rancho Mirage CA 92270) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary and final approval to add mini -storage building to existing facility. LOCATION Northeast corner of 42nd Avenue and Eclectic Street (private) ZONE S.I., S.P. The applicant wishes to add a 30 foot by 220 foot mini -storage building to an existing facility. This would be Phase III, with Phase I consisting of six buildings (A-F) and Phase II consisting of three buildings (G-I). The applicant is also askinq for approval of a 24 foot by 40 foot addition to building E (Phase I). However, no plans have been submitted. Additionally, approximately 12 new outdoor storage vehicle spaces are proposed east of the new building. An obvious fact upon inspecting the site is that maintenance of the landscaping is non-existent. While there are some trees and shrubs the majority of the landscaping consists of sand and native growth (weeds). The storage building will match the other buildings in color, materials and architectural style. There will only be doors on the south side of the building to facilitate storage of boats. The perimeter fencing and landscaping along the north property line will be relocated further to the north to facilitate the proposed construction. The Coachella Valley TV site to the north presently has a fence along the common boundary between the two uses. Therefore, it may only be necessary to replace the landscaping. The Fire Marshal has voiced a concern that water lines required by previous approvals have not yet been installed as promised. Therefore, fire flow is not adequate to protect the developed properties. Staff has been informed by the applicant the contract to do the installation has been let, but work has not yet begun. Staff recommends that the final plans not be submitted to Building and Safety Department until the work has been completed. This will insure compliance. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff recommends that prior to any final ORB approval, a complete landscape plan for the entire site be submitted to the Board for approval. The landscaping is completely unacceptable and a poor example for the first industrial facility built in the City of Palm Desert. Staff recommends that if the Board approves this that the following conditions be imposed: 1. Approval to be preliminary only. 2. A final landscaping and irrigation plan for the entire site to be submitted to the Board with the final working drawings; plans to show all existing and proposed landscaping with areas outside perimeter wall to be planted with bermuda lawn and trees. (over) 3. Final working drawings not to be submitted to Department of Building and Safety until water lines and fire suppression facilities as required by City Fire Marshal are installed. 4. Final plans to show Coachella Valley TV fence location in relation to north property line of subject site. 5. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. Should the Board feel these plans are acceptable, Staff will forward your approval with conditions to the Planning Commission for confirmation. PZ1 1 O p O O 0 0 ❑ O O tl y µj I q��.�x�.YJ �� •Y•x,.�..,t. 4y�„'Ii"';'<�hS ` ,•� 4 jt v A,.:MI151Y1Igtl YMVIII'tl I11F M9'll l$IM .•I.f GY I 'II AISIDIX\XIFNMX91tlg15 A0g11V rygplp :,l gg11iw 101 YAY SIlY m1�AF gAnlll •iy(. glNyy I -_ F li Ili lil ail;_= sl vwwF �saiow 'Y " Aw ryXAm Xm�n gglnn nwMmrwvnmrvX r )8r;1 xxmm.�tru mlrsm'.r.ryxnlw nmq Mn na2 ,-:1'�{ 'ww Mmww wwxv r. mIU11T z f 1 � � �� XWII FTIMIIXI , L11 � 1 l_ daw Mow wxlnw tnnn tlu sl lsnn t 1 1 MWS W.Uva u 1/4 c Charles S. Gibbs Mr. Stan Sawa Associate Planner City of Palm Desert August 23, 1979 As per our phone conversation, the following conditions pertaining to the landscaping at 74-875 Avenue 42 (mini - storage) will be met by November, 1979: 1. Bury sprinkling lines. 2. Finish ground cover of parkways with J uniper. 4 apu�144 3. Removehall dead plants. The reason I have not completed 2 and 3 above is due to a controversy with my supplier of vegetation as to the I arge number of trees and shrubs that have died. YdIt Sic ely l � i, Char es S. Gibbs CSG/mj Charles S. Gibbs Mr. Sian Sawa Associate Planner City of Palm Desert August 23, 1979 As per our phone conversation, the following conditions pertaining to the landscaping at 74-875 Avenue 42 (mini - storage) will be met by November, 1979: 1. Bury sprinkling lines. 2. 3. Finish ground cover j unipe 4 ua3n4 of parkways with Remove all dead plants. The reason I have not a controversy with my large number of trees CSG/mj completed 2 and 3 above is due to supplier of vegetation as to the and shrubs that have died. Yd R F C E I V F D A U G 2 3 1979 ENVIRC)NNuiV[AL SERVICES ORY Df PALM DESERT S' c ely ^ f Char es S. Gibbs C'7� �' P7 Minutes Page Six Palm Desert Planning Commission March 14, 1979 X. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Consideration of the cases reviewed by the Design Review Board at their regularly scheduled meeting of March 6, 1979. Commissioner Berkey left the Chambers at this time, due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Crump reviewed CaqvNo. 112 C ith the Commission. On a motion by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, the actions of the Design Review Board were approved by Planning Commission Resolution NO. 472, as presented; carried 3-0-1 (AYES: Fleshman, Kryder, Snyder; ABSTAIN: Berkey). XI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Mr. Williams presented details on the upcoming APA Cal - Chapter conference in San Diego for the Planning Commissioners, asking if there was any interest in attending. Commissioner Snyder recommended that all Commissioners attend if possible, and advised Mr. Williams that he would have final answers by the following Friday, as to who would be attending. B. Mr. Williams reported on LAFCO decisions at their March 8, 1979 meeting, whereby Annexation Nos. 6 and 8 were approved. C. Mr. Williams then related that a letter of opposition was sent to Riverside County regarding their Case No. 2239-E, as directed by the Commission at the last meeting. XII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None XIII. COMMENTS A. City Staff - None B. City Attorney - Not present C. Planning Commissioners - None XIV. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Fleshman, the meeting was adjourned at 2:35 p.m. ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary .- A WALTER R. SNYDER, Ckkirman /ss 0 (�t-cc;'T7 oIl DCg��-3cf)::va 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIF ORN]A 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE March 14, 1979 APPLICANT Charles Gibbs CASE NO.: 112 C The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of March 14, 1979 CONTINUED TO DENIED % APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 472 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSSION cc: Applicant CV. C.Gj.D. File ✓ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF MARCH 6, 1979. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of March 6, 1979, approving: Case No. 112C - Request for approval of preliminary and final plans for industrial storage, for CHARLES GIBBS. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of March 6, 1979. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of March 6, 1979. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 14th day of March, 1979, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ss Minutes Palm Desert Design Review Board March 6, 1979 Page Three III. Case 72 C (cont.) 1. Reduce the size of sign letters on Highway 111 to 14 inches 2. Reduce the size of sign letters on rear parking lot frontage to 14 inches 3. Locate drive -up teller sign further under canopy 4. Revise sign colors to a "rust, or other color to blend with the building" carried 3-1 (AYES: Johnson, Leung, Urrutia; NOES: Jackson). Case No. 111 C - WELLS FARGO BANK - Approval of preliminary site plans, elevations, andscape plan, colors/materials, and sign program for ccmercial structure (bank) to be located on the southwest corner of El Paseo & Lantana. Applicant was present. The Board reviewed preliminary plans for the subject case. Particular attention was given to the site design and traffic circulation on site. The applicant received directions regarding circulation pattern that should be established on the site. It was also noted that to satisfy minimum ordinance requirements, there would need to be an increase in the number of parking spaces. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Urrutia, the Board continued this case to allow the applicant to redesign the site plan; carried 4-0 (Johnson, Jackson, Urrutia, Leung). ✓Case No. 112 C - CHARLES GIBBS - Approval of preliminary and final plans for in u ria s orage, to be located west of Cook Street, on north side of 42nd Avenue. Applicant was present. The Board reviewed preliminary and final construction drawings for a three - building addition to an existing mini -warehouse project. The Board noted the master plan for the project included an area for future storage, which was now being used as outside storage. The applicant's request also in- cluded incorporating an area to the west of the existing development for temporary outside storage consisting of 63 parking spaces. Motion was made by Urrutia, seconded by Leung, to approve preliminary and final plans submitted, subject to the stipulation that: 1. All requirements of Case 58 C be met 2. The perimeter screening and landscaping be extended around the outside of the new storage area 3. Perimeter planting to consist of a ccmbination of Oleanders and Olive trees. carried 4-0 (Johnson, Jackson, Urrutia, Leung). IV. Chairman Johnson declared the meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m. Murrel Crump, Principal PVmer MC/ss e AGENDA ITEM NO. III - 7 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO.: 112 C APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: Charles Gibbs DATE March 6, 1979 West of Cook St., on the north side of 42nd Avenue S.I., S.P. The Board's last action on this site occurred on March 8, 1978, at which time final drawings were approved to construct a mini -warehouse project (Case No. 58C). The master site plan for this project included six warehouse/storage buildings, an office -caretaker's building, and a future development area, to be used as interim outside parking. The request in the current application is to construct three additional storage buildings, and add a paved outside storage area containing 63 spaces adjacent to the west boundary of the site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve preliminary and final plans submitted, subject to the stipulation that: 1. All requirements of Case No. 58C be met 2. That perimeter screening and landscaping be extended around the added outside storage area. v s ' A. AGENDA ITEM NO. III - 7 MINUTES PALM DESERT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MARCH 8, 1978 1. The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Palm Desert City Hall, after an hour study session. Members present: Eric Johnson Frank Urrutia George Minturn Paul Williams Jim Hill Members absent: Phyllis Jackson Bernie Leung Staff present: Ralph Cipriani - Associate Planner Ron Knippel - Assistant Planner It was moved by Minturn, seconded by Williams, that the minutes of the meeting of February 21, 1978 be approved as written; carried 4-1 (Ayes: Johnson, Minturn, Hill, Williams - Abstain: Urrutia). 2. Case No. 51C - HMS GENERAL CORP. - Sign program for a commercial project to Fe located on the south side of E1 Paseo and east of Portola. Applicant not present. On a motion by. Urrutia, seconded by Williams, the Board approved the sign program; carried 4-0 (Urrutia, Minturn, Johnson, Williams). 3. Case No. 76MF - BIDDLE DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. - Entrance sign for a 193 unit condominium project known as Mountainback II (Somerset). Applicant present. On a motion by Urrutia, seconded by Minturn, the Board approved the entrance signs subject to the applicant complying with the following: a. The existing sign at the main entrance to the project be removed. b. The proposed signs be named and located as shown on the attached tech- nical site plan for the project labeled Exhibit A. c. The mosaic projection be removed from the proposed entrance signs. a, Minturn, Johnson, Williams). Case No. 58C - CHARLES GIBBS - Final construction drawings for a mini -ware- house complex to -be located west of Cook St. and north of 42nd Street extended. 9pplicant-not"present. a On a motion by Minturn, seconded by Urrutia, the Board approved the final con- struction drawings for the complex, subject to the applicant revising the land- scape plan as noted below: a. Provide for additional planting of oleanders adjacent to paved areas on north and west sides of project. Oleanders should not be less than 1 gal. size - preferably 5 gal. size. Tamarisk may be cuttings or 1 gal. size. b. Provide for irrigation of oleander and tamarisk with drip system or conventional bubbles. c. Provide irrigation system plus permanent seeding of 50' strip at projects Perimeter, north of tamarisk plantings and on other side of street on west. Carried 4-0 (Minturn, Urrutia, Jbhnson, Williams). //-91V ' AGENDA ITEM NO. III - 7 November 1, 1977 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 58C. 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all develop- ment plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibit A-K), and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor changes require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, com- mencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. All service lines for utilities shall be placed underground. 5. Any roof mounted, exhaust, or air conditioning equipment shall be fully con- cealed from view from any public rights -of -way and adjoining properties by architecturally integrated means. 6. Final landscaping (with irrigation system) plans indicating plant sizes and heights shall be provided to the Design Review Board for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Lighting of parking areas and premises shall be provided as approved by the Director Gityn�irQneertal Services. Street lights shall be installed as approved by the 8. Signage shall be provided in accordance with signage plan to be submitted to the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission for final approval. 9. Construction plans shall -be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until com- pleted. 10. Right -of -grays shall be deeded to the City of Palm Desert to make 42nd Street an 82-foot width; all others shall be 72 feet in width. Construction shall be to City Standards and shall conform to all requirements of the City Engineer. 11. The plantings at all entrances should be low growers so as not to hinder line - of -sight on each side thereof. Further, the entrance sign should be relocated or elevated to accomplish this purpose. 12. The location of trash storage areas shall be indicated on the plot plan. '13. The applicant may install the required landscaping within the required 82- foot public right-of-way along 42nd Avenue. 14. The proposed development shall be limitedU><o two (2) entrances. 15. Proposed measures to provide blowsand control, particularly on the north and west sides of the project, shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for approval. 16. Off-street parking shall be provided per the requirements of Sec. 25.33-7 of the Palm Desert Zoning Ordinance. 17. The applicant shall agree to join any undergrounding district which is formed and which encompasses the subject property. 18. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. AGENDA ITEM NO. III - 7 Case No. 58C November 1, 1977 PaSe T,+o 19. A color/material sample board shall be submitted to the ORB, along with a complete set of revised final plans, for approval piror to the submittal of plans to the Building and Safety Department. 20. All aisle widths shall be a minimum of 26 feet. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Departmen) of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature ii07� DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION 1� q 6 9111 REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) ._:_ _ Y i_:_ i 1 1i mmUwl ■ — PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: _7r ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. �2 I - 2 `7/ O - O EXISTING ZONING Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNERS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- fUATIOA FOR THE FILING OF 1NIS.APPLICATION. � —1 V N AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNATURK 0 THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- RICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. �'-1-i ein en�e DATE Applicants Signature i >, GATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS AMTED BY ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. �O ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CAS ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION CAAS � ❑ OTHER REFERENCE CASE N0.-9L�i-�, The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. TENNIS DEPARTMENT DESIGN ^ PLANNING t DEPARTMENT APPLICATION OF ENVIRON- REVIEW COMMISSION r\ BUILDING AND MENTAL BOARD (APPROVES OR L� SAFETY SERVICES (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT) STAFF INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS PROCESSING SCHEDULE: CONSTRUCT ION SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. STAFF USE ONLY: Date Received Date of ACTOR Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED ;L/,)- /1Vl f �J 0/9/ Staff ORB Z/0, /-71 P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 Design Review of: CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS N CASE NO. Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi- ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap- proval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan- dards and all requirements of the City Engineer. ( ate Department of Environmental Services Form 1 CASE NO. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CHECKLIST INITIAL PLAN REVIEW NOTE: Planning Division Staff are required to reject applications if any applicable exhibits are not received and checked. I. Completed Application Form (one (1) copy) II. Address labels for project sponsors (two (2) copies, gummed labels & typed list) Not required for a single-family dwelling application, or staff approved signs. III. Detailed Plot Plan A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/Approval A. - Three (3) full size ( ( ` -`_ ' S file-be--cot-6red) C� - One (1) reduced copy (8j"x1l", or 13") B. Staff Approval B. [� - Three (3) full size IV. Information Sheet and/or Plan Block V. Site Analysis & Preliminary Drainage and Grading Plan (Three (3) copies, may be com- bined, where appropriate, with plot plan) VI. Architectural Elevations (all sides of the building(s)) A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/ Approval A. - Three (3) full size (one (1) of which is to be color keyed) - One (1) reduced copy (8j"xll" or 13") B. Staff Approval B. 1� - Three (3) full size DRB Checklist ** VII. Sign Program (elevation(s) and details, if applicable) - Three (3) copies to scale VIII. Color and Material Exhibits - Color and Materials written description (one (1) copy) - Color and Materials sample board (max. 8"xl3", 3/8" thick) IX. Floor and Roof Plans - Three (3) copies to scale * X. Landscape Plan (3 copies, 1 colored) - Plant List, (1 copy) * XI. Exterior Lighting Plan (3 copies) XII. Filing Fee Page Two A -A pvaloaS 17�� e,.t45, 1 5�- A. Commission Review/Approval ($50.00) A. 0/ B. Staff approval, single-family dwellings ($15.00) B. C. Sign Program Only ($15.00 DRB or C. $10.00 Staff) * Items X and XI may be combined. ** Sign Program only - submit items IIIB, VI, VII, VIII, and Sign Fee. Initial Plan Exhibits Received and Checked by: ing. Div. S aff. Vatfe FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS I. Three (3) copies of drawings to be submitted for plan check. Drawings must reflect all Conditions of Approval. Final Construction `/{) Drawings Received by: (�414 Ping. Div. Staff 7atO r--IGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Required Submittal Detail NOTE: Applications will not be processed until the application and all required materials are found to be complete. INITIAL PLAN REVIEW I. APPLICATION FORM: One (1) copy. Fill out completely and secure all signatures. Attach a sheet listing parties directly involved in representing the project (such as architect, engineer, etc.) and their addresses and tele- phone numbers. II. LABELS FOR PROJECT (ADD1 of gummed address labels the name and address of Commission action is to etc.). NOT required for individual —lot, or staff III. DETAILED PLOT PLAN: ication) SPONSORS: One (1) set shall be typed and submitted with all persons to whom the Planning be sent (owner, architect, engineer, a single-family residence on an approval of signs. A. Items to be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board and Planning Commission require the plot plan submittal described below. 1. Three (3) full size plans completely dimensioned and at a scale not smaller than 1 inch = 40 feet, showing the following data: - Scale - North arrow - Property lines - Lot dimensions - Public rights -of -way with existing and proposed dimensions (include street names) - Existing or proposed curb lines - Any and all easements - All utility line locations (gas, electric, cable, water, and sewer) - Adjacent property uses (showing approximate loca- tion of structures and other pertinent features) - Major vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access points to and from site (use arrows of different widths to show direction and intensity of use) - Setback areas - All existing and proposed structures - Interior vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian circula- tion patterns (if applicable) - Off-street parking (to include spaces, regulatory devices, provisions for accessory vehicle storage where applicable, etc.) - Parking areas for bicycles and carts (if applicable) - Service areas and facilities to include: 1) trash storage areas 2) mail delivery boxes 3) loading areas DRB Process Page Two III. DETAILED PLOT PLAN: (Cont.) A. 1. (Cont.) - Perimeter fencing and screening - Proposed sign locations (if applicable) - Project phasing, showing the stages of construc- tion for the entire development - One (1) copy of the plot plan multi -colored in- dicating open space/landscaping, buildings, park- ing, and driveways. Where more than one height of building is proposed, show each in a different color. DO NOT MOUNT THIS COPY ON A BOARD. 2. One (1) copy of the plot plan containing all of the general information described above, except that it is to be drafted or photographically reduced to an 8J11xll" or 13" size sheet. (All lettering to be legible; include graphic scale). B. Items to be reviewed and approved by Planning Division Staff only require three (3) full size copies of the plot plan described above. (i.e. single-family dwelling and signs valued under $1,000.) IV. INFORMATION SHEET AND/OR PLAN BLOCK: As appropriate, include an attached sheet to the application and/or specify directly on the plans, in an information block, the following data: - Owner's name, address, and phone number - Designer's name, address, and phone number - Any special information or conditions pertaining to the site or to the plans - Acreage and square footage calcualations - Ratio of structures to total land area - Ratioof parking spaces to building square footage - Parking requirements provided - Ratio of landscaping to total land area - Any specific information of special conditions particularly relevant to the project V. SITE ANALYSIS & PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN: Three (3) copies of a plan indicating the data described below (in- formation may be incorporated into the plot plan where detail is not obscurred or prepared as a separate exhibit): - Vicinity map showing major street names, other reference points and landmarks (no scale) - North arrow - Scale - General drainage pattern of area to include site and adja- cent properties within 100' (use arrows to show drainage flow to and from site). - Existing contour lines including property corners - Proposed locations of structures and drives - Elevations of pads and finished floors - Finished grades - Elevations of existing street centerline - Retaining walls (where applicable) - Perimeter walls and fences which affect drainage DRB Process Page Three VI. ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS (all sides of all buildings): A. Items to be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board and Planning Commission require the architectural ele- vation submittal described below. 1. Three (3) full size drawings (one (1) of which is to be color keyed -- see "Color and Material Exhibits, Item No. VIII. Detailed drawings must include: - Scaled drawings of all sides of all buildings, with dimensions indicating proposed height (also show proposed sign locations). - Roof mounted air conditioning equipment or other equipment mounted on either the exterior walls or the roof must be shown if visible in elevation view. - Complete street elevations including all buildings, fencing/walls, landscaping and screening; and, peri- meter treatment on non -street sides. 2. One (1) copy of the elevation drawing(s) containing all of the general information above, except that it is to be drafted or photographically reduced to an 8j11xll" or 13" size sheet. (All lettering to be legible; include graphic scale.) B. Items to be reviewed and approved by Planning Division Staff only require three (3) full size copies of the building elevations, with other information as requested. VII. SIGN PROGRAM (if applicable): Three (3) copies of drawings to scale representing all proposed signs, containing the fol- lowing information: - Scale used - Sign shape - Dimensions and sign area - All graphics and lettering to appear on the sign - Style of lettering to be used and width of strokes - Proposed method of illumination (if appropriate) - Method of attachement to any structure, or support if placed on the ground - Proposed colors and materials (see Item No. VIII) - Proposed location (see Item No. III) - Illustration of sign integration in architectural design (see Item No. VI) VIII. COLORS AND MATERIAL EXHIBITS: Exhibits are to be submitted Tor architectural elevations, walls, paving materials, signs, etc., as follows: Detailed written description (1 copy) in addition to actual color and material samples of all exterior (and sign) colors and materials to be used. An example of this would be as follows: DRB Process Page Four VIII. COLORS AND MATERIAL EXHIBITS: (Cont.) Building Walls Roof Trim Material: Sand Finish Mission Barrel Ruff Sawn Redwood Stucco Tile Color: Ameritone No. 112, Candle Red (Clay Olympic Stain Glow Tone) Dark Oak Wall Signs Materials: Sandblasted/Routed Redwood Color: Background - oak stain, Letters - white or Materials: Metal sign cabinet, plexiglass face Color: Background - ivory, Letters and Frame - dark brown - One (1) file copy color and material sample board (maximum size 8x13 inches by 3/8 inches thick containing precise color swatches and photographs (which may be clipped from suppliers' brochures) of materials which are too large to attach. - One (1) copy of the architectural and/or sign elevations colored to represent the selected color combinations, with symbols keyed to the written description. You may list the colors and materials in a corner of the elevation draw- ing or on a separate sheet. Renderings are not required unless specifically requested by the reviewing body. (See Item No. VI). IX. FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS: Three (3) copies of plans of all struc- tures (to scale) with dimensions. Floor plans should be labeled with the use of each room. Roof plans should indicate changes in roof heights, and illustrate any mechanical equipment. Roof detail could possibly be incorporated in the plot plan. X. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Three (3) copies of a landscape development plan at a min. scale of 1" = 20 ft. (1" = 40 feet allowable if tree plan is on separate sheet from shrub and ground cover plan), showing the following:" - Location of all trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover in those areas subject to public view - Botanical name and size of all plant material (labeled) - One (1) copy of plan to have individual trees and major shrub forms color -coded by species so that the distribu- tion may be easily distinguished - Perimeter treatment of property (fences, walls, vegetation screens, etc.) - Street furniture and ornamentation (if applicable) to include: - rock outcroppings - benches - fountains - water scape plan - statues - newspaper stands - Type of irrigation system to be used (in note form only; provide complete irrigation plans with construction drawings) DRB Process Page Five XI, EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN: Three (3) copies at the same scale, or combined with the landscape plan; to show all exterior lighting, its location, and type of fixtures for illumination of areas such as driveways, parking lots, storage areas, land- scape planters, tennis courts, and the building. XII, APPLICATION FILING FEE: Provide a check payable to the City of Palm Desert in the specified amount. A. Applications requiring Design Review Board and Planning Commission review/approval, fifty dollars ($50.00). B. Applications that may receive administrative approval from the Director of Environmental Services (or his appointed Staff), including single-family dwellings, fifteen dollars ($15.00). C. Sign Program Only - Less than $100 in value, $0 - Staff Review, $10.00 - Design Review Board and Planning Commission review $15.00 FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS In the final application for a building permit phase, three (3) copies of construction drawings shall be submitted for items Reviewed/Approved by the Design Review Board and Planning Commission. Plans must pre- cisely conform to any Conditions of Approval required by Planning Com- mission action. Construction drawings shall include the exhibits des- cribed in the Initial Review, plus any conditioned revisions or addi- tions, detailed in final form. NOTE: All plans (except colored exhibits) are to be folded to a maximum size of 8j"x13", prior to submitting with an application. CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION APPLICANTS' GUIDE TO PROCEDURES I. FILING PROCEDURE: Prior to submittal the applicant shall discuss his pro- posal with the Planning staff to determine whether or not the proposal is in conformance with the General Plan and to determine zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, or other requirements. II. GENERAL INFORMATION: A. Meetings: 1) City Council meetings are held on the second and fourth Thursday of each month, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane. 2) Planning Commission meetings are held on Tuesday, nine (9) days prior to the first Council meeting of the month, also at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers and Wednesday, eight (8) days prior to the second Council meeting of the month, at 1:00 PM in the Council Chambers. 3) The Design Review Board convenes on Tues- day, a week before the Planning Commission, at 2:30 PM in the Council Chambers. B. Public Hearing: Public hearings are held when the City considers re- quests for a change of zone, variance, conditional use permit, general plan amendment, etc. Legal notices for these hearings are published in the Palm Desert Post at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. Public hearing items before the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency are published in the Desert Sun. C. Appeals: Where the Zoning Ordinance provides for appeal to the City Council or Planning Commission, the appeal shall be made within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision by filing an application of appeal with the Director of Environmental Services. D. Fees: All required fees are listed in the Fee Schedule, as approved by the City Council, and specifically noted for this application. E. Building Permits: Building permits are issued by the Department of Building and Safety and are required before any new construction, re- construction, plumbing, mechanical work is commenced. F. Business License: Prior to engaging in an enterprise for profit, zoning and building code clearance for the proposed use is required and a city business license obtained. Application should be made to the Code En- forcement Supervisor. G. Private Deed Restrictions: Many parcels of land in the City of Palm Desert are subject to private covenants, conditions, and deed restrictions which may conflict with the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. The applicant is responsible for resolving conflicts with deed restriction requirements.