The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About118C KEITH A SUCHOW & STEPHEN C SIGLERBuilding Remodel PALM DESERT BILTMORE By SUCHOW & SIGLER ARCHITECTURAL DESIGNERS 40847 SECOND ST. SAN JACINT09 CA. 92383 654-4635 COLORS & MATERIALS DESCRIPTION Building Wall Roof Fascia Screen Walls Doors & (Repaint) & Beams Trim MATERIAL: Existing Con- 2x hembers 8x8xl6 Conc. Existing crete Block R/S Douglas Slump Block Doors & Fir Trim COLOR: Historic Tan 6 Ranchwood La Paz Old Salem Glidden 3622 Glidden (by Oreo) Glidden 3639 SIGN PROGRAM EXISTING SIGN design to remain unchanged except for repainting with similar colors.(See photos and elevations) Red color to be Dunn -Edwards "Paprika" #60-58 with black trim #60-20. PROPOSED WALL SIGN to match above. Joe Emerie 73-850 Highway 111 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Charleo R. Foulger 2550 N. Tustin Ave. Orange, Ca. 92267 SUCHOW Fc SIGLER 40847 Second St. San Jacinto, Ca. 92383 MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AUGUST 28, 1979 Page Two On a motion by Barton, seconded by Johnson, the Board denied this request. Carried 7-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, LEUNG, BARTON, HOLDEN, COOK, AND MARTIN). Case No. 375SA (Amendment)- Lyndale Manor and Perry Waite - mendment to approve modification to freestanding sign for commercial building; applicant was present. The background which lead to the erection of the sign as it presently exists was reviewed by Staff. Applicant stated that they wished to leave the sign in its present location and raise it to 10 ft. Mr. Leung discussed the alternative of mounting a sign on the wall and removing the freestanding sign. The Board discussed the possible alternatives to signage for the building. On a motion by Barton, seconded by Holden, the Board approved a modification of this item, subject to the following revisions: 1. The sign may be raised so that the distance between finished grade of the subject parking lot and bottom of the sign is 5 ft. 2. Oleanders shall be densely planted beneath the sign to create a monument look to the base of the sign. Carried 5-1-1 (JACKSON, BARTON, HOLDEN, COOK, MARTIN WITH JOHNSON VOTING NO AND LEUNG ABSTAINING). Case No. 114C - John Outcault, Architect for Donald Lawrenz - inal working plans for two story commercial building; applicant was present. The Board studied the submitted plans during study session and felt that the working drawings as submitted were acceptable. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Cook, the Board approved this item as submitted. Carried 6-0-1 (JACKSON, LEUNG, BARTON, HOLDEN, COOK, MARTIN WITH JOHNSON ABSTAINING). Case No. 117C - Dr. Gary Lyons, John Outcault, Architect - The final king plans for furniture building; applicant was present. The Board discussed Condition No. 9 which the applicant wished deleted at this time. The Board felt the deletion of the wood siding at the bottom of the windows was acceptable. On a motion by Barton, seconded by Leung, the Board moved to approve this item as submitted. y� Carried 6-0-1 (JACKSON, LEUNG, BARTON, HOLDEN, COOK, MARTIN WITH JOHNSON ABSTAINING). Case No. 118C - Keith A. Suchow and Stephen C. Sigler - Approval - of preliminary plans for exterior remodeling of an existing motor inn; applicant was present. Mr. Martin indicated that he would abstain from this item because of a previous involvement with the property. The Board discussed the mansard and concept of its design with the applicants. Mr. Johnson indicated that he felt a solid mansard roof is desirable.. Mr. Leung felt that the mansard should be more substantially designed because of the extreme weather conditions in this area. MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AUGUST 28, 1979 Page Three The question of signage for the motor inn was discussed extensively. Applicant indicated that they wished to keep the existing signs. The non-conformance of their existing signs and desire of the City to bring the signs into conformance with the present Sign Ordinance was in- dicated by Staff. Alternatives to removing all signs was discussed with no answer formulated. Alternatives for approving and/or denying this request were discussed. The Board generally felt that the dis- position of this signage was an important factor and would influence the exterior remodeling. After extensive discussion, it was determined that applicant should file a Planning Commission application to determine the disposition of a Sign Program for the building prior to con- sideration of any exterior remodeling. It was determined that the proper procedure at this time would be to deny this request and reconsider a new request after Planning Commission action on the Sign Program. On a motion by Cook, seconded by Holden, the Board denied this request. Carried 6-0-1 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, LEUNG, BARTON, HOLDEN, COOK, WITH MARTIN ABSTAINING). Case No. 169MF (DP 01-79) - Dame -Doty Development Company - Preliminary and Final approval for maintenance building in Chaparral Country Club; applicant was present. The Board discussed the additional driveway access requested by the applicant. Additionally the use and adequacy of the maintenance building for the project was discussed. Applicant felt that the size of the maintenance area was adequate for the project. The necessity for increasing the setback adjacent to the northerly property line was discussed by the Board who ultimately decided that the plan as drawn with a 5 ft. set- back was adequate. Mr. Crump clarified the procedure for obtaining approval of the extra driveway to Portola Avenue. Mr. Crump explained that Planning Commission approval of an amendment to the Development Plan was necessary. After reviewing submitted plans, the Board felt that the plan as submitted was adequate with the exception of the driveway which requires Planning Commission approval. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Johnson, the Board approved this item as submitted with the exception of the driveway which requires Planning Commission approval. Carried 6-1 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, BARTON, HOLDEN, COOK, MARTIN WITH LEUNG VOTING NO). Mr. Barton left at this point in the meeting. Case No. 183MF (DP 03-79) - James E. Kaul Development - Approval of preliminary plans for 36 unit condominium project; applicant was present. Staff reviewed the changes formulated by the Design Review Board during the study session. Changes pertained to landscaping architecture of the units, relocation of the pool and tennis courts, and provision for additional guest parking. Mr. Crump presented a background on the case indicating that blowsand con- sideration and emergency access to the east or west were issues unresolved as of Planning Commission approval. F, uf:a�om off 21Dam=.iJzc�c�>t 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 34S-0611 REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO.: 118C j LOCATION: 73-850 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1, S.P. APPLICANT: Keith A. Suchow & Stephen C. Sigler NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of preliminary plans for exterior remodeling of an existing motor inn. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staf and by the applicant, the Design Review Board Sensed this project, ) X)=WAW40X9PXg29t 4 Date of Action: August 28, 1979 Vote: 6-0-1 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: See attached minutes. NDA ITEM NO. III, C-2 DATE August 28, 1979 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 118C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Keith A. Suchow & Stephen C. Sigler for the Palm Desert Biltmore Motor Inn. 40847 2nd Street San Jacinto, CA. 92383 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Approval of preliminary plans for exterior remodeling of an existing motor inn. LOCATION 73-850 Highway 111 ZONE C-1, S.P. This item was continued from the meeting of August 7, 1979, at the request of the applicant. On December 21, 1976, the Board approved a Design Review case allowing remodeling of the hotel (See attachment-44C). Prior to the Planning Commission consideration, the applicant withdrew the request citing the removal of the existing signs as required would be unacceptable to him. The existing facility is located on the north side of Highway 111. There is an additional site at the northwest corner of Alessandro and San Jose Avenue which is also a part of this facility. The proposed remodeling would be for both facilities. A wooden mansard roof would be added to the flat roof buildings and new concrete block walls would be constructed throughout the site. A new wooden mansard would be constructed around all sides of all buildings with the ex- ception of the north side of buildings D and E. New slump stone block walls would be constructed, mainly around the perimeter of the site. Staff feels that in order to provide a totally integrated architectual remodeling job as required by the adopted development standards, mansard should continue around the north side of building "D" and the east and north side of building "E". The submitted plans indicate an additional "Palm Desert Biltmore" sign facing Highway 111. This sign is not permitted. The present signs on the structure are not in compliance with the Sign Ordinance. The free- standing sign along Highway 111 is in excess of the permitted height and is only permitted in lieu of any wall signs. The two wall signs fronting on Highway 111 are larger than the maximum 50 sq. ft. permitted and are too high. There may or may not be other signs which do not comply with the Sign Ordinance. The Design Review Board criteria states that "appropriateness of sign design" should be addressed. Additionally, the existing signs are not architectually compatible with the proposed re= modeling which will substantially upgrade the site. To the west of the Highway 111 site there is a vacant gasoline station. Between the subject property and the gasoline station there is a block. wall. Applicant intends only to replace a portion of this wall with slump block. Since it is not known that the gas station will be removed in the future the staff feels that the entire wall should be of a slumped _stone construction for compatibility. Staff feels that the proposed re- modeling will provide an attractive upgrading of the property with these modifications as stated above. 0 0 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. III, C- 2 Page Two STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve and forward to Planning Commission with the following revisions: 1. Dedicate 5 feet of Right -Of -Way and provide street improvements on south side of Alessandro Drive as required by Director of Public Works. 2. Provide decorative wrought iron fence and gate along Alessandro Drive for swimming pool area if deemed required by state law. 3. Provide mansard treatment along north side of building "D" and north and east side of building El 4. On Highway 111 site, provide slump stone block wall along the entire west property line. 5. On Alessandro Drive and San Jose Avenue site, step the walls down adjacent to driveways for visibility. 6. Submit detailed sign program to comply with Sign Ordinance with final working drawings; permits not to be issued until sign program is reviewed and approved through Design Review Board process; bond to be filed with City in amount estimated for com- pletion of the sign work (removal of nonconforming signs and preparation and installation of new signs). CONDITIONS 01 APPROVAL CASE NO. 44C The development of this project shall conform substantially to all develop- ment plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibits A-E). and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor cnanges require approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substawial change requires approval by the planning Commission. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of thr State. C and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this prove comencing within one year from approval date and being pr:+ptly comp 4. Any roof mounted, exhaust, or air concitioning equipment shall be ful concealed from view from anv public rights -or -way and adjoining grope by architecturally integrated means as shown. S. All utility service lies shall be placed underground. 6. Final landscaping (with irrigation system) nlans shall be submitted t Planning Staff for approval prior to issuance cf a building permit. 1. A non-combustible trash storage area shall be provided. B. All existing signs shall be removed prior to occupancy. 9. Elevations are approved as modified. 10. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshall prior to the issuance of jilding permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. I.IE1vL7 Cg16'iPLp7m to �I �ILDIJG "D 'LGz Ia' rbteL uNrls ir I;• o - ,W Is LGriJ UN 0 VSe7GLE P¢LSs Fi'Q Feeg69 � .Y G G G G — G a _ _ALC-SSP•Nf�f2o K�iz.ly� N �� hleo p,Uee IJIRFtJj dJzaBrJ UNGeuJi.D y� ICI WG LN IE$ [)(r ' PCGESS � b BL6%TW sar �.cC _ T T =N12 T T—� PccLGS Y_ � I.EFGN LINE `JriSTEH �_—y� i J 1' SaZv1GE STATIoI,� - y� ,��^L ,a,J��fr wn`—� n 6 r N � � I.. � �y-iv-}'..itt, � '3*C:se•Qe�T :. L C^� q .pecrEex NG .192 _ I. :pI ' n � G GRO A I — No�T�t �ISTIU C� PpCi•6tWCING cIGN G — - -- 9 BI.o'(i 52r �Y G��titGti P�eL`351JT1a 5•TA-TE N,C-HWAY III II ♦ I I ;Cx10TING GoNGRQ7F+ F4lYK LeiaN%{° , .V/�LL'io FY-FiMN Q TMIS � •-G�.Y'8%14 9`NnP :LOf�TiDW ♦' . I I.%1RayY� i I 4 ► it l �r 6[r.p��1'6 SLUMr DLOLK a? wf rm pyl�b NFWMW- - (�l Ky W.r r:lnn INFdo� ' • I T 4wr 9j G n.unr ea+ar. I •R ul`N O4/IINli brtWa J : ApE 2 3 ��► '6WLVINr+i°h° 0 o4uriP Lkac/G P swrnN6 PINT1Nl� � ,,I bNsnNo ama U CLCY.w- 'Ib Pa�WN � I OnR �P 4yPlE ,Z of` 8%NVlM11G GORiPJ(j. OfY.K- . I �16'SWrJ a.�, - -RdNiLF I /�' G:t6Y0 6 LNMP / 1 G6T ulbN 4�+d1 t j`��e-llYa6'lY � �- -_M1N+�FP IL�PA �Nv- — &"Alp SLYNPW.b N6'VWL6 W/GC6TN4 ' ~ND -� LYRO WNA� — --- -' • � _�4xgxlrj s4N1"IP DWL{G ib I'ZP�GG . _ _ ' � .:CY Cnhji Gn�lI P�.T9 ei-acic �uF1eRB NaiPD o✓GF. IIWrdTiNG P%ORINv I -V6+-ICY �Y+�7 LaaTIoN INK6+p = GYg� WINR� �I 9a R - _ u � I --I ZI I � - rd y -� _ . = _— fix=-- E y -. :6UILLyNG EXTEZ{O�. eENL-'/76L FOG. _ _ - _ _. _DKIGNED e, DM�\VN F.SY• `Y �/./.,��,./� L7 o N � rJ _ iFY/ ` /✓ ' (,(j O'er �'JiLLgL/g _ _ pp�� F?pp))�M,_DE"-�c7.�Gd.IF�JI`:ti =" ., P' Fl�'TUPA G651Co�a� , yGiiW1S� F Fe,,UW C714657. 0222 1LBa tl.TuGNJ Ave. u, Zsa7 4,1347 EECaJD er. 6AW „JKJN'R7 CpUF 9Z30D� r � 3 (-714)684.4co.' '-7 y 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO.: 118C LOCATION: 73-850 Highway 111, Palm Desert, California ZONE: C-11 S.P. APPLICANT: Suchow & Sigler/ 40847 2nd Street, San Jacinto, Calif. 92383 NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of preliminary plans for exterior remodeling of an existing motor inn. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the Design Review Board continues this project Date of Action: August 7, 1979 Vote: 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: This item is postponed to August 28, 1979 meeting. I MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AUGUST 7, 1979 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meeting was called to order at 2:30 P.M. after a 1 hour study session. MEMBERS PRESENT: Eric Johnson Phylis Jackson Bernie Leung Murrel Crump (For Paul Williams) MEMBERS ABSENT: Vern Barton STAFF PRESENT: Stan Sawa It was moved by Jackson, seconded by Johnson, that the amended minutes of July 17, 1979, and minutes of July 24, 1979, be approved as written; carried 4-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, LEUNG, CRUMP) Minute motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session - none. CASES Case No. 118C - Suchow & Sigler- Preliminary Plans for exterior remode ink o an existing motor inn at 73-850 Highway 111; applicant was not present. The Staff received a verbal request from the applicant to postpone this item to the meeting of August 28, 1979. On a motion by Crump, seconded by Jackson, the Board moved to continue this item to the meeting of August 28, 1979. Carried 4-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, LEUNG, CRUMP). Case No. 119C (REF: 91C, Hughes Investment) - Bank of Indio - re iminary Plans for bank building on Hughes Investment site at the northeast corner of Highway 74 and E1 Paseo; applicant was present. Staff explained the proposed changes formulated by the Board at the study session. Mr. Leung explained the architectual changes which the Board felt was necessary to provide a building which is compatible with the surrounding shopping center. The concept of utilizing the same roofline as the buildings around the bank was deemed desirable. Applicant could then have some flexibility with regard to treatment of the walls. Applicant explained the concept for the design as submitted. The Board and applicant discussed on -site circulation patterns and problems. Alternatives to the submitted plan and Board recommended plan were discussed with the applicant stating that adequate stacking room for the drive -up lanes was necessary. After considerable discussion, it was determined that a revised plan was necessary, incorporating changes discussed. The Board instructed the Staff to set up a meeting between Public Works Dept. , Staff and applicant to study the feasibility of an additional driveway off of E1 Paseo. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Jackson, the Board moved to continue this item to August 28, 1979. The applicants were generally instructed to provide revised plans considering the following items: 1. Study feasibility of reversing direction of traffic through driveup lane. CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA TREASURER'S RECEIPT Received of: Received : CITY TREASURER �Jl v I Account No. I Amount II Total �QQb BCNC ]��0� Y0MRE ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** 'DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Keith A. Suchow & Stephen C. Sipler Applicant I Pleme mot) 40847 Second St. Moiling Address San Jacinto, California City State 654-4635 Telephm,6 -------�� 92383 Zip- Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) (43*j.A miouw) Primarily to add a new roof fascia desi--n Pround all sides of all buildings the overall appearance ng Secondarily to replace existing concrete block screen walls at front landscaping. This will: allow closing off entrance walkways in time of flood; PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Existing "PALM DESERT BILTMORE MOTOR INN" 73-850 Highway 111 contained on Lot 9 in Block 2 of Palma Village t 2 in Block A of Palma Village Unit No. ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. 627-184-002-2. 627-I81-012-2 EXISTING ZONING (Lot 2) C-1. SP (Lot 9) R-3 (4) Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION,,FO�R THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION. IGN TUP ATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATI` I;-/rO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TIO'NS THAT�MAY /BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. SIGNA DATE Applicants Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER ACCEPTED BY CASE No. 118 C_ REFERENCE CASE NO CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review of: CASE NO. IIS L Remodel of Roof Fascia and Front Elevations (Highway 111) Keith A. Suehow and Stephen C. Si ler APPLICANT Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi- ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap- proval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan- dards and all requirements of the City Engineer. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 Jbe Emerie 73-850 Highway 111 Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Ph. (714) 346-6088 Charles R. Foulger., 2550 N. Tustin Fve. OranaeI Ca. 92267 O Wes. Ph. �714) 637-8222 SUCHOW & SIGI,ER 40847 Second St.�G+�`' San Jacinto, Ca. 92383 Ph. (714) 654-4635 w Jbe Esaerie 73-850 Hi&Yuva 111. Palm Desert Ce, 2260 Ph, (714) 3�6-608 Charlos R. rctz:, er 2550 N. ziaszar_ Ave. Ormave, Ca. 92267 P11. ? 714) 63-7-8222 SUCHOW & SIGLER 40847 Second. St. San Jacinto, Ca. 92383 Ph* (714) 654-4635 M�J= VbT1oN-CUI�Dif3G'E QM Ot UVA.rl,*N — OU&OIN4;r ' JD" I _ Y .w"a,ra7ioN- 9�pWo..GiNce •l l' ION DU. L 0-- - G bow 1144 - -O r=L-EvA,"T.ofJ- l-,ui 4. IELayA4TIow- YaUJLC11.lG "c • _ v-.. f + E�EVAT1oN-6UILt�ING � Paim DeLeht r, I I I a L _j Ill_lFl- C i i i - NJ 13 - - it --r n 1 A.'w -o t.EI-EVATiO - �IJILpINC� A �vaT1' �- , I I 1 ! EI.-EVATIo — �UILg1Nra � �a+r►1.�-�/*1�`��'� - coLor.,es # HATaeiALopv- 5FXHIbIT PALM P�eoeer L$II,lmolerz .L — oIC�IJ UETTmwo GOLOIZ DPu,Lolwc-, �mAll-s6mp^,wT) � r-�sciA � ems 4coNa3a rff sLuM p pLc,,w k" ., cv, 40847 SEra.lC) sT SAN JACINTO iGALIF. 92383 (714) 654.4Co35 .. 1 v d dl tl� 7 �J � z u r J , � r'✓�L'" ,_ems?` f�' i <'_`,r'��.�"`� .� �2'�; I =.' ! r• . r Q� w L&I o N -W Z rw W `4 i K I �I w ,B 16 VO OJ IDNVW NV 31V'��31j31llr1006 dtlOJ 1N1lld� CATAMINfG Rd UJ EFIELD AVE. SO. SAN FRANCISCO U 94060 ■ —O ° i m n Z C_ 1� O z y m ri 1— m rr. 07 (D y 0 V � m m In 1 T I �x �e 2 c Qt 6 i RIr ' 2oLo�l �o s al 41 z f � I I 3 71 f CCE 1Ice 1 S e i lit i r L]-t1lil In I -.r sc-.,I,l dt OT m m n n si __.��f►�ii v_{,,,/- Fes^ Te^..•K..116A-.--..G Er-._.�+`1+,.- - ._-:.. _ ��--�".�i C:/��ii(�..'`'.:.y.•I.�rw4l-°ter"n�''+��I '..1�`+ y — t d» to.oc6twcuw /� ,f��/ " 1"'U r�-TI N � - per" r � r �=; J,..e• �.T . - , ,� •.l'. _ z � -� ��a � ��. �---� � � :..v � �d i�'a ►,.'' < DATAR}INj GOpP, 40p LITTLEFlEID AVE. SO.SA M"CISCO CA 94pO z z � � ILI oT m m n n _.i.h.."/� I �r+C�. ird'F�i'".icsl^,%:m�. �'�i�i�< f.. ♦ �� m � � �f � �� F�-' �'r^"^r�.." � �,��T""�sf i'✓P�,,.k�.� � tl �� - .. .. _ V v e Z .� r s En wc-. ow+jc��Yml „ -', � .. �, t.i� •' 4 7l �Co � ++ sv JJ , �i • 'y 3 o m '� Cl�UIi.pIN _xT►.off M !=== pItr�1�1R1'r� m a a � L _ / G �/ i An:�../ t4a_ /�N n _ m — 7�� _ _ . _ N (714) 6o57, 22.�'eerr _ _ ( { ''�� ' _. [�� 1�y�t°� j � �'i� ��,,�wg !},f��ry'^�� ,,.,/},.+ y��.,. - :eEl.✓+s � � 1.{.d`.C-1 .► 1�.. Li��4 "J s i gm ze pal.- . � mot, __.. _..._.. I'e1 l�.d iiF1 a+°°d•'aty.-'> �"^5f f�1 ►._.C•e"6� a� %Cs'.tifrm.'4 `� m -.10 Lf 0 O ID ➢ _�ir'____F�/C^-1.-----1x'te�el .J.a6_V_ _i�/J' .'--_ —" 1-��i��L__._.__. ..µ �'_�. �ie,D:2T 1d __._ __ m m -V ➢ Z D r m m __ _ " . �J.�i�- - --- - — _ - }per -�yj�- :--:"f �+ - - _ _ _ - -- -- - u J2 cn m��y� j t �� t ^x. S+n ��Fa vwT'+�^ &A '~�„'l'.'.b.-�' - ➢ _ f -.,/.y - .'/� i �,p, �, jet. r,� D �4 j y_.Y,oy.. of j � g� - .g .y'�j �Grr5 - ' i } - -. aJ _._ �R°'Y.i/�.! ' 4.,.�.� f`�"�NN:1;_:�.+"F�'I�'1. ili°r'__�7iLr- .. �_ f 1. J'-.Si%Sr'"( ? i f FT L .V T 7,..N� -T 10 li� a Jos moor.IOLNI . V1 W N m �PlJI!Dl�j H 0 o ti U N W v F,1E Lo4a n� w � W a _► O .[ FLooiZ Loa �'I►�tS�iEi��!'l� H W a W w w o N� 0 0❑0 0 (`) Dl'3L D ❑ Q El O Q rz� O i Goo C�❑� JOB NO. SHEET NO. OF