Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout121C HUGH COMERFORDWILLIAM SEXTON 71-537 HIGHWAY 111 RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIF. 92270 WILLIAM SEXTON 71-537 HIGHWAY 111 RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIF. zY .. 92270 JACK B. HENDERSON 61194 PRESCOTT DR. JOSHUA TREE, CALIF. 92252 ti JACK B. HENDERSON 61194 PRESCOTT DR. JOSHUA TREE, CALIF. 92252 JULES H%RMON 10155 COLLINS AVE. BAL HARBOUR, FLA. 33154 JULES HARMON 10155 COLLINS AVE. BAL HARBOUR, FLA. ;. 33154 i ncCOMERFORD,S ANTIQUES FLOWERS & GIFTS H.J 73-990 EL PASEO, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 - 568.3587 (/Gz� —Awt zv a4Q ,ZXA�'4 a Y-9 /1� MINUTES Page -4- Palm Desert Planning Commission Meeting September 19, 1979 X. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Consideration of cases action on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of September 11, 1979. Mr. Williams announced to the Commission that Phyllis Jackson is the new Chairwoman and Bernie Leung the new Vice -Chairman of the Design Review Board. Stan Sawa presented this case requesting approval of a garden entrance at the rear of a commercial building at 73-990 E1 Paseo for HUGH COMERFORD, Applicant. He stated that the new garden entrance would provide area for landscaping surrounding the entrance. Upon motion made by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Kryder and unanimously carried, Planning Commission Resolution No. 531 was adopted. 4-0. As an additional item, RICHARD DOTY, 43 Barcelona, Rancho Mirage, was present to request an approval for plans of a Maintenance Building for the Chapparel Country Club. A long discussion was held regarding an additional access entrance off of Portola which is in the plans. After discussing the pros and cons of this additional entrance, Motion was made by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Berkey to approve plans for the Maintenance Building for the Chapparel Country Club with deletion of the maintenance entrance on Portola. Carried unanimously. 4-0. XI. DISCUSSION ITEMS Status report - General Plan update; consideration of preliminary drafts of revised Housing, Land Use and Seismic Safety Elements. Mr. Williams introduced John Dos Santos, Assistant Planner who discussed the General Plan with the Commission. Chairman Snyder suggested that the Commission review this rough draft in detail so that it may be familiar for discussion at the October 17, 1979 meeting. This will also give Commissioner Fleshman a chance to review the General Plan since he was absent for the discussion. Motion was made by Chairman Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kryder and unanimously carried to have the Commission review a rough draft of the General Plan for consideration at the October 17, 1979 meeting. 4-0. XII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None XIII. COMMENTS Chairman Snyder suggested that the Sheriff's Department be called and asked to give more warnings to people on Frontage Road rather than citations. Gtf�1�7 o F �n=a 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE September 20, 1979 APPLICANT Hugh Comerford 73-990 E1 Paseo Palm Desert, California 92260 CASE NO.: ------ The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of September 19, 1979 CONTINUED TO DENIED X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.531 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision, PAUL A. WILLI4S , SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING CO,%D1ISSSION cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. e !. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.531 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING, THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION AT THEIR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1979. WHEREAS, The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of Septem- ber 11, 1979, approving: Case No. 121 C - Preliminary and final approval of plans for garden entry at rear of commercial building at 73-990 E1 Paseo for HUGH COMERFORD. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons de- siring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board action of September 11, 1979. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of September 11, 1979. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this llth day of Septem- ber, 1979, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Berkey, Kryder, Miller, Snyder NOES: 0 ABSENT: Fleshman ABSTAIN: 0 iF1W01--W PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary WALTER SNYDER, Chairman i`�x M 'D Page -4- 4. Staff recom¢nendations as indicated in report dated September 11, 1979. Motion was carried 4-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, MARTIN AND COOK). �ase No. 121C - Comerfords - PrelLninary and final approval of garden entrance at rear of commercial building at 73-990 E1 Paseo; applicant was present. The Board reviewed the revised plans which were submitted by the ap- plicant. On a motion by Martin, seconded by Jackson, the Board moved to approve this item as submitted; carried 4-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, MARTIN AND COOK). Case No. 395SA - Imperial Sign Company for Palm Desert Pet Hospital - approval to erect a 4 ft. by 6 ft. free standing sign at 73-120 Hwy 111; applicant was present. The Board reviewed the sign as proposed by the applicant. In the loca- tion proposed by the applicant, the Board found that when a building is constructed on the easterly lot, visability of the sign would be elimi- nated. Additionally, the members felt that the sign was not integrated with the architectural design of the building. The Board discussed the various options for signage available to the applicant, i.e. wall signs, alternate location of sign. On a motion by Martin, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to continue this item for restudy of the following items: 1. Determine alternate location for sign. 2. Provide sign which will be architecturally integrated with the building. Motion was carrel, 4-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, MARTIN AND COOK). Case No. 85C - General Telephone (Bernie Leung, Architect) - Request for modification of approved final plans for addition to General Tele- phone building on the north side of Hwy 111, west of San Luis Rey; ap- plicant was present. During the study session, the applicant requested that modification be allowed because of the subsequent change in the mechanical needs of the building. It was determined by the Board that modifications would be acceptable provided Natal Plum Shrubs and Ficus Trees are provided between the screen and property line. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. CUP 08-79: Request for approval of Conditional Use Permit to allow addition to residence in conjunction with Palm Desert Conn munity Services District facilities located at 44-491 Portola Avenue. Mr. Crump explained that this item was postponed pending council ap- proval of the waiver of filing fees. V. ANNUAL ELECTION OF OFFICERS - It was determined that election of of- ficers should be postponed until the next meeting in order to allow all members to be present. VI. AA7OURIZENT 5:00 P.M. STAN SANG, Associate Planner A ENDA ITEM NO. III, C-q DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 121 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Desert, California 92260) DATE September 11, 1979 Commerford's (73-990 E1 Paseo, Palm NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary and final approval of qarden entrance at rear of commercial building. LOCATION 73-990 E1 Paseo, Palm Desert, California 92260 ZONE C-1, S.P. This item was previously reviewed by the Board at the last meeting of August 28, 1979. The applicant has contacted the original architect for the building who has drawn plans for the proposed garden entry. The plans are similar to the originally submitted plans with the excep- tion that,the 1 x 1 framework has been removed and the door has been changed to a wooden gate to match the panels. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Determine acceptability of revised plans and if deemed acceptable, approve and forward to Planning Commission. 0 MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AUGUST 28, 1979 12. Provide for 20 ft. along Country Club be provided prior permit. wide pedestrian easement Drive; said easement to to issuance of a building Page Five 13. Provide 8 ft. wide meandering bike/pedestrian path along Country Club Drive as required by Director of Environmental Services. Carried 6-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, LEUNG, HOLDEN, COOK, MARTIN). Case No. 177MF - C. R. S. Development Company - Approval of final working drawings for seven single family residences; applicant was not present. As an oral item Staff presented the final working drawings for seven single family residences on Candlewood Drive. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Johnson, the Board approved this item. Carried 6-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, LEUNG, HOLDEN, COOK, MARTIN). Comerfords - Preliminary and Final approval of plans for garden entry; applicant was present. The Board indicated that they would like to see a garden enclosure designed by the original architect for the building. It was hoped that through this procedure, a garden enclosure which will be architectually compatible with the building can be achieved. The Board also in- structed the applicant to check the private deed restric- tions to insure that the garden entry did not encroach into the non -buildable area. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Jackson, the Board continued this item until September 25, 1979 with the applicant to contact the original architect and to provide plans which will be architectually compatible with the existing building. Carried 6-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, LEUNG, HOLDEN, COOK, MARTIN). IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. DP 09-79:Request for approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow 1100 dwelling units. The Board felt additional street access should be provided possibly on Frank Sinatra Drive. 2. DP 10-79: Request for approval of a Planned Residential Deve opment to allow 116 dwelling units. The Board had no specific comments regarding this project. 3. OP 11-79: Request for approval of a Planned Residential eve opment to allow 22 dwelling units. The Board had no specific comments regarding this project. MINUTES Page Five DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AUGUST 28, 1979 12. Provide for 20 ft. wide pedestrian easement along Country Club Drive; said easement to be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 13. Provide 8 ft. wide meandering bike/pedestrian path along Country Club Drive as required by Director of Environmental Services. Carried 6-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, LEUNG, HOLDEN, COOK, MARTIN). Case No. 177MF - C. R. S. Development Company - Approval of final working drawings for seven single family residences; applicant was not present. As an oral item Staff presented the final working drawings for seven single family residences on Candlewood Drive. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Johnson, the Board approved this item. Carried 6-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, LEUNG, HOLDEN, COOK, MARTIN). Comerfords - Preliminary and Final approval of plans for garden entry; applicant was present. The Board indicated that they would like to see a garden enclosure designed by the original architect for the building. It was hoped that through this procedure, a garden enclosure which will be architectually compatible with the building can be achieved. The Board also in- structed the applicant to check the private deed restric- tions to insure that the garden entry did not encroach into the non -buildable area. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Jackson, the Board continued this item until September 25, 1979 with the applicant to contact the original architect and to provide plans which will be architectually compatible with the existing building. Carried 6-0 (JOHNSON, JACKSON, LEUNG, HOLDEN, COOK, MARTIN). IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. DP 09-79:Request for approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow 1100 dwelling units. The Board felt additional street access should be provided possibly on Frank Sinatra Drive. 2. DP 10-79: Request for approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow 116 dwelling units. The Board had no specific comments regarding this project. I. DP 11-79: Request for approval of a Planned Residential Development to allow 22 dwelling units. The Board had no specific comments regarding this project. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL:SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION V J' F S REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) - 7`R6�[gcF- C—.(IrAT c Ou Rt N ftrE'. D 0 STD 2 E C PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ,An,m0 ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILIN 10F THIS APPLICATION./ r�ca-vst/ George M. Johnson CPA 9/5/79 SIGNATURE fjor n ownerDATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF M DESERT F ALL BIASILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- I TRICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. r / / SIGN' URE DATE Applicants Signature 14�0752; - SIGNATUfl DATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACCEPTED BY ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. _ ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CASE No. ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER REFERENCE CASE NO. �• T C The Design Review Board reviews detailed design permit. DEPARTMENT APPLICATION OF ENVIRON- MENTAL SERVICES STAFF process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building DESIGN REVIEW BOARD (ADVISORY) PLANNING COMMISSION (APPROVES OR DENIES PROJECT) NIS INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS PROCESSING SCHEDULE: n DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND ( CONSTRUCI SAFETY LLB,// ION SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. Cand Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. STAFF USE ONLY: Date Received Date of ACTOR Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED Staff DRB P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 r•1 CITY OF PALM DESERT C APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review of: CASE NO. I� ' I / TYPE OF PROJECT TJ U�i 1r !/• t �T%1 Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially C to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Envi- ronmental Services. Any substantial change requires ap- proval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Stan- dards and all requirements of the City Engineer. i Date Department of Environmental Services Form 1 a, 1 CASE NO. I 61 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CHECKLIST INITIAL PLAN REVIEW NOTE: Planning Division Staff are required to reject applications if any applicable exhibits are not received and checked. I. Completed Application Form (one (1) copy) II. Address labels for project sponsors (two (2) copies, gummed labels & typed list) Not required for a single-family dwelling application, or staff approved signs. III. Detailed Plot Plan A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/Approval A. - Three (3) full size (one (1) of which is to be colored) - One (1) reduced copy (81"xll", or 13") B. Staff Approval B. - Three (3) full size IV. Information Sheet and/or Plan Block V. Site Analysis & Preliminary Drainage and Grading Plan (Three (3) copies, may be com- bined, where appropriate, with plot plan) VI. Architectural Elevations (all sides of the building(s)) A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/ Approval - Three (3) full size (one (1) of which is to be color keyed) - One (1) reduced copy (8j"x1l" or 1311) B. Staff Approval - Three (3) full size A. 0 W1 t C DRB Checklist ** VII. Sign Program (elevation(s) and details, if applicable) - Three (3) copies to scale VIII. Color and Material Exhibits - Color and Materials written description (one (1) copy) Color and Materials sample board (max. 8"xl3", 3/8" thick) IX. Floor and Roof Plans - Three (3) copies to scale * X. Landscape Plan (3 copies, 1 colored) - Plant List, (1 copy) * XI. Exterior Lighting Plan (3 copies) XII. Filing Fee Page Two A. Commission Review/Approval ($50.00) A. 1771 B. Staff approval, single-family dwellings ($15.00) B. C. Sign Program Only ($15.00 DRB or C. $10.00 Staff) * Items X and XI may be combined. ** Sign Program only - submit items IIIB, VI, VII, VIII, and Sign Fee. Initial Plan Exhibits Received and Checked by: / Ping. Div. Staff .Date FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS I. Three (3) copies of drawings to be submitted for plan check. Drawings must reflect all Conditions of Approval. Final Construction Drawings Received by: / Ping. Div. Staff Date COMERFORD'S ANTIQUES, FLOWERS, GIFTS 73-990 EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CALIF. 568-3587 RE: TRELLACE ENTRY COURT PARTIES INVOLVED IN REPRESENTING THE PROJECT: 1. ARCHITECT: WILLIAM SEXTON 71-537 HIGHWAY 111 RANCHO MIRAGE, 92270 2. CONTRACTOR: JACK B. HENDERSON 61194 PRESCOTT DR. JOSHUA TREE, CALIF. 92252 3. OWNER OF BUILDING: JULES HARMON 10155 COLLINS AVE. BAL HARBOUR, FLA. 33154 CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA TREASURER'S RECEIPT < Received of: 44a6o 4 CgVAAeE �e !� Ilm � Date w For Account No. Amount a 0 U W m J N O W Received: CITY THE SURER w b b Total - a Y N U W 2 U s�vevas tyres ���.'- rr'",� ", `'« ;.;v Ot:tJ�rra let Ayr:,w��tH eES•tc k H D N d O t l Y. la A. k(Y IJ :t, rYt r-4 A4 �jv+� I a VI N 4� L" O N N r � US --T��v ` Q Y I' r W� I j a I 1— Z Q 0 z I� Al 1 i?-42 Zlil 111 _ = _ 1 r, IN -- 'l --- — _i [� I J- - i • {lp- - -- - �t&W Z •i fiC J z W24YV GZ(— j �l ' Wy �Szc�g yYJ U W u� 6 w� LLJ �7 OW ci ijc!e ti d F-N a Y R NO NZ Z t o3 u. oQ w 7 ri g O ci w m O � tl � a 0. m Vr, W ir�s" U _ > W � Z d LL z W Z O z v —Z �O Z Lar Z w-OZ. x W w w we W DK C C LL CI Z p t� y citiFa Z J o�a a S UJ J I" QZ N rc Q W 0 Ow Orr Y � C3 r} Z O tU o U �~ r r.. c..