Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout125C GERALD J CHAZANIBM / EEEEW"- - 4 Rom Oi ,Ie X-- o La la -j Ll 1 z w (j K Ut air J b 14 : CL > > r J z uj Uj 0 J AW VLSW Of MDO(mpq 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT CA. 92260 MoMag 13IGNt DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ��®��� PLANNING DIVISION State l SIGN REQUEST ( Describe type and purpose of the sign (a).) ;castes stc�/ �'� ESTIMATED VALUE OF SIGN (S): $ Q0 515-e G O - /"X W/ c:2 13 -z46-7?k Telephone _.. ?/ Zoi 3 t&-fdL7s- Telephone SIGN LOCATION ( Street address, suite no., building /project name, or location In relation to streets) -(055 Owl -7 5i �3- ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING Property OwnerAuthorization The undersigned states that they are the Owners) of the property described herein and hereby give outhoriz o it an for the filing of this application. SIGNATURE DATE Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed ristrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES— TRICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. SIGNATURE DATE APPliconit Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY SI ATURE DATE Accepted by 1:7 STAFF REVIEW I DATE O DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO Reference case no 41 chv oV p100M o 0 0 N 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 September 15, 1988 CASE NO: 1481 SA APPLICANT (AMID ADDRESS): CALIFORNIA NEON PRODUCTS (FOR VON'S STORES, INC.) 4530 Mission Gorge Place, San Diego, CA 92120. NATURE OF PROJECT'/APPROVAL SOLIGM: sign. LOCATION: 72-657 Highway 111. ZONE: PC-3 Replacement of Safeway sign with Von's Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural oamdssion approved this case by minutes motion. Date of Action: September 13, 1988 Vote: Carried 5-0 (Catmissioner Sullivan opposed). (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF Ca44ENTS: Please read the attached minutes. Upon receiving final approval it is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. CONTINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday prior to the next meeting. FT, a SUBJECT TO MrNarEs REV1SfON PALM DESERT ARCHITECIURAL COn4 SSION TUESDAY - SEPTE BER 13, 1988 12:00 P.M. ca4uNITY SERVICES omFERENcE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARDU DRIVE I. The meeting was called to order at 12:00 pm. Commission Members Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory, Chairman X 15 2 Mary DAY X 16 1 Russell McCrea X 12 5 Rick Holden X 14 3 Steve Sullivan X 16 1 Others Present: Steve Smith FYankie Riddle Catherine Sass Phil Drell Brent Conley It was moved by Commissioner Drury, approve the minutes of August 23, (Commissioner Holden abstained). 1. CASE NO: PP 87-24 seconded by Cc m issioner Sullivan to 1988, as submitted. Carried 4-0-1 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): JOHN OUTCAULT, 74-133 E1 Paseo, Suite 11, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SaLurr: Final Approval of a 15,800 square foot one and two-story medical office building on Monterey Ave. and Fred Waring Dr. LOCATION: Monterey Ave. and Fred Waring Dr. ZONE: O.P. Commissioner Gregory abstained. 2. CASE NO: 1481 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CALIFORNIA NEON PRODUCTS (FOR VON'S STORES, INC.) 4530 Mission Gorge Place, San Diego, CA 92120. rONUIEs SUBJECT TD ARa-uTEcivRA�' cu�russlorr REVISION SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Replacement of Safeway sign with Von's sign. LOCATION: 72-657 Highway 111. ZONE: PC-3 Commissioner Sullivan opposed. 3. CASE NO: TT 22111 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CURT DUNHAM/BIRTCHER MESA VIEW, 73-080 E1 Paseo, Suite 101, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SO[ W: Approval of an additional elevation (3d) for the Monterra Development. LOCATION: Mesa View Drive at Alamo. ZONE: PR-3 With the condition that solar protection be added to the east, west and south elevations, as approved on previous model. 4. CASE NO: PP 88-5 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DAVID NELSON, P.O. Box 300, La Qui_nta, CA 92253. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Modification of triplex and redesign of landscape plan. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Deep Canyon & Driftwood Street. ZONE: R-3 (3) III. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: 1473 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): WOODY'S/PACIFIC NEON, 1576 Silica Ave., Sacramento, CA 95851. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOMIT• Approval of new sign program. 2 AGENDA ITEM NO: III-A-3 CASE NO: 1481 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CALIFORNIA NEON PRODUCTS (FOR VON'S STORES, INC.) 4530 Mission Gorge Place, San Diego, CA 92120. NATURE OF PROJECT/A 4WVAL SOUGRT: sign. LOCATICN: 72-657 Highway 111. ZONE: PC-3 Replacement of Safeway sign with Von's The existing Safeway building Identification sign is 62 ware feet. It will be replaced with a 37.5 square foot Von's sign. Both the existing and new signs include "Food and Drugs". The color will be changed from an orange -red, number 2662, to a more pure red, number 2793. "Von's" will also replace "Safeway" on the Highway 111 monument sign. Staff reconynanis approval. PD/fr MEMBesa "iio°�ic'rro�iuce xrr:xio rf0oi :ouo'v"rxi u ORUSi.i Ip....M01 G11pp,Ri .SO u.�oo � oamo z nrm meoae "aina. r+i"'an'our�mF of .oax oc. r am 1 u.xamm "xc. rte coarsen a u"rpou+� calllarala as,, pdecH. m uhci�r�Ncil woI -- Gor4r & W H I &r.AP14 IG II�!STtN(�I�P,ED P�/6� jHS -ro P i N ES GENTE(� 1� °EXlsji 1�G° R�DWOOC Ivor R� GOPK- 9"ue Ii Ex1 sr i Gil - fl.AIN IOWCr\eTC- 5'(RWTUKL— ���li POSG'D-1 ALL STEEL ASTM A36 ALL PIPE ASTM A53(0) EAB. LIE. -652 PI"`OOUCTS wsnn,<-%���i�A7 "•. •a » s cs�a Mission coacF rvcc vw o1Eca. cAuraa"u Enm .nrsro" o.rz 10Gn0N �'� I-�wv ! I PAU^ 17�¢T C LM3 RLE GRF: 16191 Z" 2111 SSrtnU miLw iq �3 S (UGLO FI N 140 941111n1m mass pro/,slg / � Y UO FOOD Awn DRUG aA lbws tib.273 ALL STEEL ASTM A-36 ALL PIPE ASTM A-53 (B) FAB. LIC. -652 proouc-rs IS]oYl,lom �Om.E%ACE SM DIEM, MIFOL111A 92IN 111 rr 1111 """"I'll (ED connAi ,i r� it Luc <EI"°� Lvlslon uA M m1i t' SToR s on; w ,'—� inin.e T ��[ tip[' �p A l ,lm1 67+4wf fll PALM PEA�MTl CA AL11. -1/� Otilinli �I C..nI T IO. LETTE=S -'ELF CONTAmD . CHANNEL MP_ LETiP`S � 7'K9" D��P'- Fi-cMMED EvbVS RED POW HA=S f'•a'..`; t. t ^ BLALI" SIC�i (TWO G'�AYr+) . He=_T SHEST ME:TP,L ' ' - PIZ"NICE 'vISGONN j5,\'JITaiL}{ ON �CkF L.GS'TE'L- LIGFi 1N6- d TUc"E5 cF GLg A♦_ RED 15 MIL NEON-19'•TUBy suFr=t-'^.S O TRANSr�ZMfRS- L�.�.,' aO MA. HIGH PrnYEr- FFtANC-- T !F_eg _ (OR eQUINAL,�T)�) , 5' LfaTTTEP "Vr �YONS) 1 ;; �• _; IVILL 7P.KE 2�^5v� 90 MA TRAN> 5 tt ;,C,•r:. - TH6 5' L��P p-w- .N- 55 (VONS WILL Ph11J%--. ; -- Ot•!r Ga"c(• Da )JVThL F'i=tMEP IIf TYJ GOATS :1=25LAC.K ErJHrn.L- ZNAN1 Fv` ' INTF_ , OF L,*- � ,Oz_5 ;Os NOTES. —4-s'-bl t�rre�s rnLls— IiAY(; �T-pT/,U� �.•�C•rI IN'�EOhI MBER - %1- BS3 fib il'2756-Reo` _PPINLR Y. -we II7�'N1tMu: tuas(rT, r�z t �bAw I� Y yZx3HCIA =9 LIIY��lY DIlE° L IRONS TvrICpL LN TRA�+��M6iZ— �•••.•• "aA ?NrN Port m Pr_Trw•s Froas/u LNCL f� HossvTl E.ra TVee S✓Ws+RTL N W N SET METAL. PTp. OLAcr- LW GET%EjL_{16SA SGLr�CON9PINEJ _WALZ.— . W FTxS'b�-¢y'1 N-LO N s=.S �GTIoNP E.E E — Ya7JG.-T3CaCr� —-W7N-PLPSTe2% WOJRSNDS I- ex-31I.CneE BOLT W/5HIELp.?yP, `4_Q�10 C-ABM VtrTE2s _—._ ALL STEEL ASTM A•36 `• \\ ALL PIPE ASTM A-53 (D) FAD. LIC. •652 CONM1NR p81I11E 774 STOR11S proouc-rs�' eF 1 lDGrron r4/P9LI0 US II sae �+. r.S r9ID NI)HE:(19) 283IACC SRI UI[GO, CLLIrOHNIA 931ID rens:oN Hn— TEIEPHON[:f91979N3191 suesson QTG 9u¢nu �� iiiionb sN's 9m: (?-10-EE• a i yam. 1 '0 i TA�S TJTa 4-11 v-)i 1.10 µIv' Ptpt 9 ��3IaZ p.�/''" O W�f� W3S �firtC «FS "T1#c`�zc la no rY Q EA r'M S E RT .'..Y TIC ENT F ENVIK'.':P�fTv2ENURES.NO. �VED BY: FORM21-82ots CONSTRUCTION ;ALL 00!"—•' ONE YEAR OF IS W. ' A.6 __'� '11�/z r 0Ad7;, r& _04J41r2" MINUTES OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY - JUNE 24, 1980 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS i, The meeting was called to order at 2:40 p.m. after a two hour study session. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vern Barton Al Cook Rick Holden Eric Johnson Charles Martin Chairperson Phyllis Jackson MEMBERS A SENT: Bernie Leung STAFF PRESS Stan Sawa Murrel Crump (present during portion of meeting) On a motion by Ho den, seconded by Martin, the Board moved to approve the Minutes of June 10, 1980, as written. Carried 5-0-1 (Cook, olden, Jackson, Johnson, Martin, with Barton abstaining). II. Minute motion approvin cases found acceptable at the study session: None. III. CASES 1 Case No. 125 C - HEATH AND COMPANY - Approvalof sign i gbetweeSafewayn El Market on the we side of Palms -to -Pines Shopping eo and Highway ill; E. Briesemeister was present. The Board reviewed sign request of the applicant. The applicant stated a desire for a larger sign and indicated that 130 square feet o :ipal Code rea is permitted. Staff corrected the applicant indicating, p er Requirements, 75 square feet of sign area is permitted. The Board reviewed the submitted sign color and possible alternatives. After discussion, the The applicant Board determined that the color, as submitted, was acceptable. requested signage for the rear of the building facing Elo aaeVariancefbecause informed the applicant that this would require approval the Market backs up to El Paseo and does not have any public entrances facing El Paseo. A relocation of "Foods" and "Drugs" was discussed with the Board determining that the location, with a minor modification, was acceptable. On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Martin, the Board moved to approve this t to the following rev request subjecisions: 1. Signage shall not exceed an output of 10 candlepower at ten feet per adopted Development Standards. 2. Two foot -distance to be provided between Safeway and Foods and Drugs Carried 5-1 (Barton, Cook, Jackson, Johnson, Martin, with Holden voting NO). to gram CaseCase N tmercialAbuildinng atc/o 74-3990Highhway 111�;dBobtCompt nnwasopresent1. +�in_ctnry C The Board dis indicated modi program which i sed the request for the amended sign program. The Board cations they felt should be implemented to provide a good sign ,cluded maximum size signs and standard sign heights. The signs for the eal Estate Store were discussed with licantpa9reed licant t dica- ting desire fora 1 rger sign on the west side. The applicant tine. to j The Board the stated dthatsolh lsignsthe shouldehave rounded ecorrners todprov�r ould decempata- The signs for he Desert Design Furniture and Commonwealth Bank were bility. approved as submitted. On a motion by Barton, sec program subject to the fol d by Cook, the Board approved an amended sign ng revisions: CITY OF PALM DESERT IRE VIR'S RUE 8 814 RECEIVED FROM: AMOUNT RECEIVED: CITY THE SURER BY: `/ p NO. AMOUNT CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE 4, 0830,880,42 6 •15.0j21 73-310 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 SIGN PROGRAM :AFRUCa1MICH PORN: Dept.of Planning and Community Development FFPODUGTS / VANS STOKES, INc. -Wphaanr (plwse prt�n� i✓l i ss i o N �C-zl P _. ?Amale ong Address (� I pn n— S�nl D IE�GD � LI � �► a, i a� City star@ z;o-c-cad. u�C\(A-' N� c ot�UCTS 23-III Sign Maker / Contractor Taaonans SIGN REOUgST ( Describe type and purpose of the sign(s)). P` /c, lIi E I X>r— - of ISIT• ILLUM • GIk�NN� W/k�l, r^fMCx� D/f:- M01,1I U M eN i ' ON l V 00 ESTIMATED VALUE OF SIGN (S) $ 01 , OOD roo SIGN LOCATION ( Street address, suite no., building/ project name, or locatlon in relation to streets). ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO., )41�— I W4JOJ EXISTING ZONING ?61-12 Property Owner Authorization: The undersigned states that they are the owner(s) of the properly described herein and hereby give authorization the filing of this application. 50�- ArVi6t+6V Signature Date Landlord of Building The undersigned states that they are the landlord of the building for which the sign (s) is for, and hereoy give cur izotion and approval for ins filing of this application. If some as caove, sign in bath ploces. ;jAM C Signature Date Agreement aosoty rig fete CITY OF PALM DESERT of all liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEM Absolve the City of Palm Oesert of all !iaciiitiss regarding any deed restriction: may be applicable to the property described harem. Ukc.-LIC. 17�G�ii c-lo ca-i� G247 —Q1-7 _L( eft R1 WIUTIAL to--4I-0 Signature Gdre (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ACCEPTED BY: ❑ STAFF REVIEW Jars CAM men REFERENCE CASE N0. •r y VONS Pons Grocery Co. August 12, 1988 Re: Letter of Authorization To Whom It May Concern: nct VON Compnnia, Inc. Please consider this letter as authorization for California Neon Products to act as agent on behalf of The VONS Companies, Inc. to: RM/pc Apply for, execute, receive and perform all other acts necessary to be done to obtain building permits, construction cerificates, etc., as appropriated from the respective city. Sincerely, 1 '�'''� Mr. Russ McKee Manager Equipmnt Purchasing Construction Dept. r Vons Grocery Co. • P.O. Box 3338, Terminal Annex, Los Angeles, CA 90051 - 10150 Lower Azusa Road, El Monte, CA 91731 • Telephone: (816) 579-1400 i t H = 7 o lilt $ i l 2 CC0.cpmy L COI S.G _i °�gogog s Iz MM) S 0 0 3 0 w Q �]7II K IJ It NJ a� 1 T W lkI to A tu � p o v a� m a All Uwproouc�-s CITY OF eAV" (%%�'r CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF BLDG. & SAFETY TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: CALIFORNIA NEON PRODUCTS 4530 Mission Gorge Place San Diego. CA 92120-4188 (619) 283-2191 THURSDAY, AUGUST 25th 1988 ENCLOSED, PLEASE FIND DRAWING SETS AND INFO. FOR SUBMITTAL OF THE VONS SIGN PROPOSAL TO BE INSTALLED AT THE SAFEWAY SUPERMARKET AT IA-&G-7 HWq (I( FAL-tA b j ,u}Ur. , FOR THE VONS TAKEOVER OF SAFEWAY. HOPEFULLY, ALL OFOURPLANS ARE COMPLETE. FORTUNATELY, ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE IS OF LESSER SQUARE FOOTAGE THAN THE EXISTING SAFEWAY SIGNS. CALIFORNIA NEON PRODUCTS WANTS TO COMPLY WITH YOUR CITY'S CODE, AND IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS; DON'T HESITATE TO CALL EITHER BOB Mc CARTER OR MYSELF. SINCE WE ARE WAY UP IN SAN DIEGO, WE WOULD PRE- FER TO HANDLE AS MUCH OF THIS BY MAIL AS WE CAN. THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HELP ON THIS PROJECT. RANDY HEFFER/PERMIT DEPT. Electrical Advertising 0 Neon • Plastics • Aluminum 0 Architectural Design CONTRACTORS POCKET IDENTIFICATION CARD ' Gereral En?neeerg CcntrzCD1 C-29 Masonry B- General Emic:ra c;mrac:cr C-32 Parrin9 Z Hrnvay lmorovemenl C- 2 Insulation 8 Pccuseral C-33 Painting Z Decoraung C- 4 goner Hct Water Heating C-34 Recline a Steam Fining C-35 Plastering C- 6 Cabinet Z MIII Work C-36 PlumOirg C- 6 Cencrele C-35 Refrigeration C- 9 Drywae C-39 Foaling C.10 Electrical tgenerall C-42 Sanitation System C.I I Eevator lnstal.ren C-43 Stteel Metal C-12 Earmvmrk Z Pang C-45 E!ectriwl Sign C.13 Fencmi; C-46 Solar C.15 Fbanng Z Real Cove,,M C-47 ManulacwieE Hatni g C-16 Fire Ftotectian C.50 Steel. Reinforcing C-17 Glen,; C-51 Steel. Structural C-20 Warm -air Heatlra, Ventilating C-53 Swimming Feat Z P.ir-CcmNanirc C-54 V. Icammic Z htosaat C.21 Euwia:.ng h!winp Z Demolition C-55 Winer Gcnanianina C-23 Ciramemal metes C-57 Well Drilling twined C-26 Lamlrg C-W :":e�mrg C-27 Lancscaa:ng C-61 U wea Specialty .t c STATE OF CALIFORNIA Cft-j T CONTRACORS f - STATE UCENSE BOARD Building Quality 3132 BRADSHAW ROAD SACRAMIENTO, CALIFORNIA 95825 I ; THIS IS YOUR POCKET IDENTIFICATION CARD - KEEP IT WITH YOU } C i DETACH AT PERFORATION AND FOLD 14- Audit No. 5 5 5 5 O 1 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD w 1w EXPIRES ON ANY CHANGE OF BUSINESS I i .0 nay va ADDRESS MUST BE REPORTED TO 1 THE REGISTRAR WITHIN 90 DAYS. I o 11;I;o Iss . a e 1 I = CLASSIFICATIONS 176699 CALIFORNIA NEON PRODUCTS C10 I 4:30 MISSION GORG.2 I I SAN DIEGO -CA 92121) i . I 'RECEIPTNO. 02402B 13L.221 .. I FOLD-1 1 4- FOLD l I .f'G 1 Certificate of Insurance THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON YOU THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT AN INSURANCE POLICY AND DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND, OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW. This is to Certify that — Name and LIBERTY F CALIFORNIA NEON PRODUCTS, INC. .. address of MUTUAL, 4530 Mission Gorge Place Insured. San Diego, CA 92120 is, of the Issue dote of this certificate, insured by the Company under the policylies) listed below. 'The insurance afforded by the listed policylies) is subject to all their terms, exclusions odd conditions and is not altered by any requirement, term or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate mWV be issued. TYPE OF POLICY CERT. EXP. DATE POLICY NUMBER LIMITS OF LIABILITY COVERAGE AFFORDED UNDER W.C. COV.B LAW OF THE FOLLOWING STATES: BODILY INJURY BY ACCIDENT WORKERS' $ 500,000 EA. ACCIDENT BODILY INJURY BY DISEASE 10/31/88 WC2-162-025758-017 CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION $ EA. PERSON BODILY INJURY BY DISEASE $ nnnPOLICY LIMIT COMPREHENSIVE BODILY INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE ❑ FORM ❑ SCHEDULE FORM EACH EACH $ OCCURRENCE $ OCCURRENCE PRODUCTS COM- Q f ❑ LETED OPERATIONS ❑ $ AGGREGATE $ AGGREGATE w J m COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT w Q C9 =i❑ INDEPENDENT CON- - TRACTORS/CONTRAC- BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE TORS PROTECTIVE $ EACH OCCURRENCE CONTRACTUAL ❑ $ AGGREGATE LIABILITY T O ti ❑ OWNED $ EACH ACCIDENT -SINGLE LIMIT-B.I. AND P.D. COMBINE $ EACH PERSON m ❑NON -OWNED Q Q ❑ EACH ACCIDENT EACH ACCIDENT HIRED $ OR OCCURRENCE $ OR OCCURRENCE K w 2 I— O LOCATIONS) OF OPERATIONS A JOB 11 (If Applicable) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS: `NOTE. You w 11 NOT be nol,M1ed annually of the cominu.han at this coverage. You will be notified If In, raveroge s terminated or reduced. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION: THE COMPANY WILL NOT TERMINATE OR REDUCE THE INSURANCE AFFORDED UNDER THE ABOVE POLICIES UNLESS DAYS NOTICE OF SUCH TERMINATION OR REDUCTION HAS BEEN MAILED TO: F CITY OF PALM DESERT BLDG. & SAFETY DEPT. CERTIFICATE 73-510 FRED WARING DR. HOLDERS PALM DESERT, CALIF. 92260 AUTHORIZED SENTATIVE San Diego, CA DATE ISSUED OFFICE L_ J This certifimte is executed by LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE GROUP as ¢sire,, such insurance ass afforded by has Companies. liberty Mutual hw Greg Il5 Tes 112 TO:v FROM: SUBJECT: INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM (� City of Palm Desert �J D 6 Y,^ k WL,�:) wawa DATE: .._J uLy a f 116t3 Clfazam Colfstructtait Cdxpairy July 16, 1981 City of Palm Desert Planning Dept. 45275 Prickly Pear, Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Attn: Stan Sawa Dear Mr. Sawa 431 N. BRAND BLVD., SUITE 101, GLENDALE, CA 91203 (213) 246-7268 0 old- �l�-�� onlLy �J As requested by the City of Palm Desert, Chazan Construction Co. will design and construct a screen to shield all equipment visible from II Paseo Drive. We also will build a trash enclosure adjacent to Safeway's loading dock in the par kingg� 1 qt. I-pac,ST rl� �relu1v vJL_ AL,+ 1ns1.v�A s�tPuB snGs �►J �15obi6 SGIrQs�. ,Suh%iv\=zd adjacuwr -%,o AWY it, Ren aPi��ov�ed f ug. plav� .� All of this work will be accomplished in accordance with the directive from the City of Palm Desert, and will be started as quickly as possible. Safeway Store # 273 72-675 Hwy. 1112 Palm Desert. pk/BMW CC. File Office- Chazan Const. Sincerely, Chaz nstr ion Co, I Bill eaver, Construction Supt. JUL 161981 ENVIRONi;ILN1AL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT aUl uJaz1� � b4- � m plm�a pn--to2 -ro G C4 O Jp0 K- f2.t✓'(A t L SN�� 4 J4Ca✓�..9 —[o raQ4�F�tJI�A[J� . C-�Y. Gov - vpptl2., 7a 1-as 0LIP e s ►J AlG vrstaL-r-, -P t5j�ipd5cjc) (� &- r-,Nr "Fa 1-odDt ►JG, tf-�-� � ��I.JAti/ P Y A�1�-btC-�c� ►JDT ,t��PTb�1.��. Stf� t� �vvink�S +o pea %/ I D-e, L,& J D s cp4� S642eeiJ �L �9D%vk4 ►a,nd SG e per. or.� k ru s-00 al e ►v�c� adJac. T GJ L Hml trt. IR�6Aon- akr) &t ro(:, -.Nb, q SL, PAge,t) pr�vl k g-r�N P�zp L�u��•l tosk+ -fir, S 4 L . c l< © flK FAplt,. ► to' L.t654- S , GaMpi� Go►Jc-P TA c cuopep a,8sr=-.-c PST* Ter) -s J L- NDA ITEM NO. III, A-1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 125 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) DATE June 24, 1980 Heath and Co., Attn: E. Briesemeister (3225 Lacey St., Los Angeles, Ca 90031) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Approval of sign for Safeway Market LOCATION Westerly side of Palms to Pines Shopping Center between El Pd�,eU and Hwy tti. ZONE PC (3) The applicants are requesting approval of the Safeway Sign for the new market, which is presently under construction on the west side of the existing Palms to Pines Shopping Center. When the working drawings were approved, thq plans indicated a maximum 75 sq. ft. sign and approx. location. The applicants have now submitted detailed drawings including a sign color. The proposed sign would be located on the facia and consist of individually mounted metal channel letters with a plexiglass face and internal ilumination. The proposed sign would say Safeway with foods and drugs also noted. The total square footage of this area would be approximately 51 sq.ft., which is within the 75 sq.ft. permitted by code. The applicants have submitted a sign sample which appears to be orange. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the submitted Exhibit and would offer the following comments: 1. In order to provide an aesthically pleasing sign, staff feels that foods and drugs should be stacked on top of each other on the right side of the Safeway sign. This may necessitate reducing the size of the foods and drugs letters to conform to the height of the Safeway letters. 2. The plexiglass sample submitted is too bright and should be toned down to more of a rust -red color. Based on the above staff comments, the Board should review the submitted Exhibit to determine acceptability. - ' LIVE OF CANOPY SHOPS \ '^� V' ALT6RNATi /-OC. SAP, -WAY LeTTTS" MARKET � - ._.... —. Vaa• 0 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO: 125 C APPLICANT: Heath and Co. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of sign for Safeway Market LOCAIION: Westerly side of Palms to Pines Shopping Center between E1 Paseo & Hwy 111 ZONE: PC (3) DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and fly the applicant, the Design Review Board approves this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: June 24, 1980 Vote: :1 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: See attached minutes CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA APPLICATION FOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD 1. Location of Property Palms.to Pines West (shoppin.1 center) 72-625 Hwy. 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Asscsoor's Parcel No. of Property:629-720-015-9 and 629-720-016-5 3. Zoning Classification of Property: Commercial 4. Use of s d' t structure(s),gopo L. . ehi.�, 2 wall signs of individualletters (illuminated) totalling 51.25 sq. ft. of surface; 1 6-ft. diameter circle plaque (non-illum.); 1 "Super Store" lium.)sign of 96 sq.ft.; 1 "Pharmacy" si 5. Gross industrial or commercial residential units or signs: of sq.ft. (ilium.) ildi.ng area or number and type of 5 signs: 1)"Safeway" on bldg. front, 2)"Pharmacy" , 3)"Super Store", 9)"Safeway-" on rear wall, 5)"S" insignia at eye level on bldg. front. 6. Applicant: (Please print) SAFEWA! STORES (Name) hSa.L g Address: 12200 i3ellflower 31vd (Please print) (Street Address) Downe, CA 90241 (City) (State) (Zip) Phone:(213) 923-7531 Cordon Powers (Area Code) (Number) Names and addresses of others who should receive an agenda notify- ing them of the hearing: (Please print) Heath and Company att: F. 3riesemeister 3225 Lacy Street Los Angeles, CA 90031 7. I hereby certify that I have read and understand the adopted Standard Conditions of Approval of the Architectural Review Board as set forth in this application. n n 8. Property Owner Palm Desert, L can (Pleaselprint) Ch 431 N. Brand Blvd. Suite 101 Bailing Address: (Please print) (Street Address) Phone: Glendale CA 912C :ate) P (Area Code) (Number) �s G,ry OF PALM DEyGRr 2 r � � L TO BE USED BY STAFF Based on the fact that this application is accompanied by the materials and information outlined in the instructions, I accept it for review by the Architectural Review Board. Signature Date Fee Paid Case No. Assigned Meeting Date Assigned Reason for ARB Review Categorical Exemption Class No. = E.I.R. process complete Case No. Ministerial Project 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION APPLICANT: Gerald Chazan (431 N. Brand Blvd., Glendale, CA 91203) and Robert Ricciardi, AIA (73-700 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings and sign program for Safeway Market, which is to be located in Commercial Shopping Center. LOCATION: Westerly side of Palms to Pines Shopping Center, between E1 Paseo and Highway Ill. ZONE: PC(3) DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and �y the applicant, the Design Review Board approves this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: Vote 1-29-80 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: See attached Minutes. MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JANUARY 29, 1980 Page Three III. CASES (Continued) On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Barton, the Board moved to deny this request. Carried 5-0 (Barton, Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Martin). Case No. 165 MF - PALM DESERT COMMUNITY CHURCH - approval of a one-year extension of time for a previously approved Design Review case and preliminary and final approval of an addition to the Christian Education Building located at 74-321 Highway 74; Joe De Caster was present. The Board reviewed the plans submitted by the applicant with Staff indicating that in addition to approval of the addition, they were also requesting approval of a one-year extension of time for a previously approved Design Review case which allowed an office addition which has been completed. The Board indicated some concern regarding landscaping around the Church and indica- ted a desire to review a landscaping plan. On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Barton, the Board moved to grant preliminary and final approval of this request subject to the following revision: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Board shall review and approve a landscaping plan for the Church property showing existing and proposed landscaping. Carried 5-0 (Barton, Jackson, Johnson, Leung, Martin). Case No. 198 MF (141 MF) - ROBERT SHELDON - preliminary and final approval of plans for a four -unit apartment building at the northwest corner of San Gorgonio Way and Las Flores Lane; Robert Sheldon was present. It was indicated that this case was previously approved as 141 MF by the Plan- ning Commission on September 20, 1978. Since the applicant did not implement the project within the one year time limitation, it was pointed out that this application for a new approval was required. The Board reviewed the Staff recommendations with the applicant. In addition to the Staff recommendations, the Board requested that additional architectural treatment be provided around all windows. On a motion by Barton, seconded by Leung, the Board moved to grant preliminary and final approval with the following revisions: 1. In addition to sidewalks on all streets, curbs and gutters with tie-in paving shall be constructed as a part of this project. 2. A trash enclosure with solid doors shall be provided within the parking lot area. 3. Parking spaces shall be double -striped per Municipal Code requirements. 4. Five -gallon Cape Honeysuckle ten feet on center with Gazanias also to be planted in the two -foot planter strip along the westerly boundary. 5. A minimum five foot high board fence to match the wood siding used on the building shall be provided around the patios and entry facing Las Flores Lane. 6. Stucco popouts shall be provided around all windows. Carried 4-0 (Barton, Jackson, Leung, Martin, with Johnson leaving during discussion of this item). Case No. 125 C - GERALD CHAZAN - approval of final working drawings and sign program for Safeway Market on the westerly side of Palms to Pines Shopping Center between E1 Paseo and Highway 111; Robert Ricciardi was present. The Board reviewed the final working drawings and Staff Report. It was deter- mined that the architectural change to the front of the structure was acceptable. The 30 foot height limit as established by the approved Development Plan and sign location for the Safeway sign was discussed. The applicant questioned the 75 square foot size maximum. On a motion by Barton, seconded by Martin, the Board moved to grant final approval of this request, subject to the following revisions: 1. That the height of the structure be revised to a maximum 30 foot height. 2. Sign location to be on facia at lower portion of mansard roof with sign 75 square feet. Carried 4-0 (Barton, Jackson, Leung, Martin). ROBERT H. R ICCIARD I A. I. A. & ASSOCIATES 73-700 Highway 111 • Suite 1 • Palm Desert, California 92260 January 21, 1980 Mr. Murrel Crump Principal Planner City of Palm Desert P. 0. Box 1977 Palm Desert, California 92260 Re: Case No. CP 05-79 Gerald Chazen, Applicant Dear Mr. Crump: 1. The area of the Safeway Store on our approved Site Plan was 38,715 Sq. Ft. • 346-2212 We have enclosed the loading dock because of unsightly trash and mess that could create a problem with the Sandpiper Condominiums across the street. This additional floor area is only 2,640 Sq. Ft. or 6.8% increase in floor area. 2. The signs for Safeway allowed under the Sign Ordinance Section VII, B & C, is 130 Sq. Ft. The sign therefore, shall be 3 Feet high by 43 Feet long. The location of the sign under the Ordinance cannot be higher than 20 feet. We are requesting that it be allowed to be on the top of the facia. However, we will appeal this location at a later date. 3. We have made a slight change in the front elevation of the market. We had a plaster soffit supported by wood beams. We are requesting that the wood beams be replaced with plaster arches. Sin4RT y rs �' ROB. RICCIARDI A.I.A. RHR:jc h• '.45v1Y y.. Jt1 9 z t Ln. 'h'W` .1 1%a • . •M.l �.::..�` yI�.R' �,�:.,.; 5 : e" 'd +w.�yNW`fkt k 9 y MD.I.ARD ARCHIILL-rA ASSO ATF_R •, A,.a...... c.rw..w n..+aK tr..o. ur.. CITY OF PAUA DESER-' Ogpa ViENT OF C�j RvICES rC jc i{'J. A COMMERCIAL COMPLEX �p��IN pokm.♦ EhJl'pILL1A A, Z. A. i A680CIAT38 „1 Y"Y 141 IO �S WFIi ........... .....•. o.... e.••.e.... a...a C:. b 6 CITY OF PALM DESSERT DEPARTMENT OF ENVI.304MEAITAL SERVICES EXHIBIT NO. CASE NO. , < e— 0 r.UILARD ARCHULETA AHBOCUTM `�, -ev Ml po> mt Rpnesowest eo X. :s Y • S3ivmossv v I lauviDazu m vp (U:b:aZF O `fin. —L= :QXDZ3czns -a, 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALI FOR NIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE November 16,.1979 APPLICANT Gerald J. Chazan 431 N. Brand Blvd. Glendale, CA 91203 CASE NO.: 125 C (DP 05-79) The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of November 14, 1979 CONTINUED TO DENIED X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 551 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COU14CIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COJLHISSSION cc: Applicant r v r rt C O nFn u�i :=D C9)=Qns -Ch, 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE November 16, 1979 APPLICANT Robert Ricciardi, A.I.A. 73-700 Highway 111 Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO.: 125 C (DP 05-79) The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of November 14, 1979 CONTINUED TO DENIED X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 551 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIA`'S, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMKISSSION cc: Applicant r it 0 v n r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 551 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROV- ING, THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION AT THEIR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 6, 1979. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of November 6, 1979, approving: CASE NO. 122-C - Preliminary and final plans for Racquetball Club at the north- east corner of San Carlos Avenue and Alessandro Drive for JACK WISE. CASE NO. 183 MF - Preliminary plans for 36 unit condo- minium project on the south side of Country Club Drive, between Monterey and Portola Avenues for JAMES KAUL DEVELOPMENT. CASE NO. 125 C - Preliminary plans for market and preliminary and final plans for retail buildings "A" and "B" for GERALD J. CHAZAN. CASE NO. 156 MF - Preliminary and final approval of a four -unit apartment on the south side of the intersection of Sun Lodge Lane and Shadow Mountain Drive for BERNARD LEUNG. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of November 6, 1979. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of November 6, 1979. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 14th day of November, 1979, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KRYDER, MILLER, SNYDER NOES: NONE ABSENT: FLESHMAN ABSTAIN: NONE ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary WALTER SNYDER, Chairman /dj i MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY - NOVEMBER 6, 1979 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. The meeting was called to order at 2:30 p.m. after a 2 1/2 hour study session. MEMBERS PRESENT: Al Cook Rick Holden Phyllis Jackson Eric Johnson MEMBERS ABSENT: Vern Barton Charles Martin Bernie Leung STAFF PRESENT: Stan Sawa Murrel Crump It was moved by Cook, seconded by Johnson, that the minutes of October 23, 1979, be approved as written; carried 4-0 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, Johnson). II. I.t was moved by Cook, seconded by Johnson, to approve the follow- ing cases reviewed in study session and found acceptable: Case No. 122 C - Jack Wise and Rick Holden - preliminary and final approval of working drawings for Racquet Club at the north- east corner of San Carlos Avenue and Alessandro Drive. Case No. 156 MF - Bernard Leung - preliminary and final approval of a four -unit apartment on the south side of the intersection of Sun Lodge Lane and Shadow Mountain Drive. Case No. 398 SA - Poul Moller - sign program for new commercial building on the west side of Painters Path between Hwy 111 and Avenue 44. Carried 3-0-1 (Cook, Jackson, Johnson, with Holden abstaining on 122' C) . III. Cases Case No. 164 MF -'Silver Spur Associates - preliminary approval of landscaping plan for Area C of Ironwood Country Club on the north side of Portola Avenue just west of Mesa View Drive; Larry Spicer and Tom Weir ( Woodward Dike) were present. Staff discussed the changes suggested by the Board during the study session. Those changes were as follows: 1. Change pinus haletensis to pinus eldarica. 2. Change koelruteria bipinnata to chorisia speciosa or jacaranda. 3. Change tamarix trees to eucalyptus rudis (five gallon size at 10 ft. and 12 ft. on center). Applicants explained the concept behind the provision of the desert landscaping along Mesa View Drive. The applicant indicated that the open fencing would be wrought iron. The applicant agreed to show all perimeter fencing on the final landscaping plan. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Johnson, the Board approved the preliminary landscaping plan subject to the above -mentioned revisions. Carried 4-0 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, Johnson). t -• MINUTES DESIGN REVIE!d BOARD November 6, 1979 Page 2. Use No. 170 MF (Amendment) - Lewis Homes - amendment to rtion of fi al landscaping plan adjacent to Hazy 74 for tract loc ed at nor east corner of Haystack Road and Hwy 74; Betty 41i iams and Bert nt (R. W. Forsum) were present. ApplicanN indicated that because of a water line asement, the water district w ld not allow any shrub or tree plant'ng over it. Staff indicated ch ges the Board requested during t study session. These changes e as follows: 1. Add two 24" bo ize Mexican ash a/ith24t"obox the tennis court areas. 2. Replace the four e alyptus trees size bottle trees. On a motion by Johnson, se nded this amendment subject to th ab submit revised plan). Carried 4-0 (Cook, Holden, Xckson, Cook, the Board moved to approve mentioned revisions (applicant to n). Case No. 183 MF DP 03-7 - James Kau evelopment - preliminary approval of site, floo elevation, and 1 dscaping plans for 36 unit condominium project the south side of Co try Club Drive between Monterey and Portol Avenues; James Kaul and lliam Cathcart were present. Applicant pre nted a cross-section of the landscapi plan showing how blowsan protection would be provided. Staff pres ted a back- ground on jrrevious meetings on this items. On a m9flon by Johnson, seconded by Cook, the Board granted p liminary appr al of this project. -e'rried 4-0 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, Johnson). Case No. 125 C (DP 05-79) - Gerald J. Chazan and Robert Ricciardi - pre 1 roval of working drawings and sign program for buildings "A" and "B" of commerical shopping center on the westerly side of Palms to Pines Shopping Center between El Paseo and Hwy 111; Robert Ricciardi was present. When this item was discussed, the applicant was not present initially. Because of the noted changes required, the Board felt the item should be continued. Therefore on a motion by Holden, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to continue this item. Carried 3-0-1 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, with Johnson abstaining). Applicant subsequently showed up and asked for a reconsideration. The applicant stated the reason why he wished to receive approval at this time. The Board and Staff then discussed the changes that are necessary. During the discussion the applicant stated that there would be a 16 ft. distance between the top of the wall along E1 Paseo and the loading dock elevation. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to rescind the previous action. This motion carried unanimously. Thereafter, a new motion was made. On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Holden, the Board moved to grant preliminary approval of the market plans based on the plans submitted with the Development Plan. Also as a part of that motion, the Board granted preliminary and final approval of the retail shop areas with the stipulation that all changes be made before any approval by Staff is given. Additionally this motion is subject to the following revisions: 1. Show that 60 degree angle parking spaces provide a minimum 18 ft. wide aisle. 2. Relocate street trees (palm trees) so that they are located just inside of the proposed sidewalk. F r MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD November 6, 1979 Page 3. Case No. 125 C (DP 05-79) (Cont.) 3. Show 10 ft. high parking lot lighting with lights to be same as those used in Columbia Savings & Loan Center. 4. Show walkway kiosk or landscape element adjacent to easterly property. 5. Show potential sign locations on elevation plans. 6. Provide detail of treatment to walkway areas. 7. Submit grading and final civil engineering plans. 8 Show landscaping for savings and loan pad (landscaping to be installed along with the development of the retail buildings). 9. These final working drawings are to also include construction of retaining wall between the two retail buildings along E1 Paseo. 10. Show height of mounding adjacent to streets (on landscaping and/ or grading plans). Carried 3-0-1 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, with Johnson abstaini//9). Case No. 188 MF (DP 09-79) - Pacific Coast Builders an allew-McFar- and - preliminary approval of site plans, lands capi plans, floor p ns, elevation plans for Phase I and approval of lubhouse floor pla at the northeast corner of Cook Street aountry Club Drive; Steve Indeshman was present. Staff disc sed the suggested changes det ined desireable by the Board during the study session. As a r ult of the review during the study session, the Board felt that th item should be continued in order to allow r submission of ad tional information and plans. On a motion by Cook, econded by olden, the Board moved to continue this item in order to allo ubmis on of the following: 1. Elevation views of tr lex units. 2. Front and rear elev ion of units 3 and 4. 3. Additional pool ar a on th south side of private road. 4. Revision to bloc• and protect n with emphasis on planting which can withstand e extreme elem ts. 5. Provide alt atives to eucalypt trees between units. 6. Submit ele tions for golf cart ad 'tions to units. 7. Study so r exposures with emphasis providing overhead struct es and/or shade trees on weste exposures. 8. Defi the berm between the golf course a a and tennis courts. Carr 4-0 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, Johnson). IV. Di ussion Items: None V. Adjournment - 4:15 p.m. Stan Sawa, Associate Planner NDA ITEM NO. III C-3 DATE November 6, 1979 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 125 C (DP 05-79) APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Gerald J. Chazan (431 N. Brand Blvd, Glendale, Ca 91203) and Robert Ricciardi, A.I.A. (73-700 Hwy 111, Palm Desert, Ca 92260) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary and final approval of working drawings and sign program for buildings "A" and "B" of commerical .Shopping center. LOCATION Westerl side of Palms to Pine Shopping Center, between E1 Paseo an Hwy 111. ZONE PC(3) Development Plan 05-79 was approved by the Planning Commission on May 29, 1979. The applicant has now submitted working drawings for the two retail buildings. In addition to the retail buildings there is a market and savings and loan on the site. This approval is for the two retail buildings which are attached to the market structure. Major concern regarding the development was voiced by residents of the Sandpiper Condominium Project across E1 Paseo. As a result, the Planning Commission felt that screening of the Center along E1 Paseo should be of utmost concern. Attached are the minutes and approved resolution regard- ing the Planning Commission approval. STAFF ANALYSIS: The submitted plans are in substantial compliance with the original Development Plan. However, because the plans for the market are not included, information regarding treatment along the rear of the building and within the loading area is lacking. The applicant has submitted a landscaping"plan with these drawings. However, without details on the market, it is difficult to ascertain whether adequate buffering and screening will be provided. The sign program as submitted complies with applicable City codes. Therefore the Board should determine whether they will be architecturally integrated with the development. There are a number of items which require clarification or change due to the preliminary approval or code requirements. They are as follows: 1. Trash provisions in area of loading zone appear to be inadequate. 2. 60 degree angled parking spaces require an 18 ft. wide aisle (park- ing spaces as drawn do not provide a 24 ft. aisle width). 3. Due to placement of palm trees to east of project, the proposed street trees should be placed just inside of the proposed side- walk to be compatible with the existing palms on El Paseo. 4. Parking lot lights are higher than the maximum 10 feet permitted by Code (14 feet shown); consideration should be given to utiliz- ing 10 feet high Black Box Lights as used in Columbia Savings and Loan Center. This type of lighting can be used when the westerly property is developed. Also, there may not be a need for new lighting along east property line because of the existing lights along that property line. The Board should determine whether the lack of working drawings for the market would necessitate postponing approval of this item. It may not be possible to properly review these plans without the market drawings. Should the Board feel that these plans should be approved, Staff will forward your decision to the Planning Commission for approval. It should be noted that approval should also include the above stated corrections. 0 n r E ERT I. A. b._..... ...... . CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EXHIBIT NO. ....-.r-. CASE. {' 'NO. _.'._.. 11979 PALM DESERT Re: Palms to Pines West Palm Desert, California TENANT SIGN CRITERIA The sign criteria is part of the lease documents and shall conform to requirements as follows: All signs shall be submitted to Landlord, for written approval prior to fabrication. Size of letters and manner of construction shall be in accordance with drawings and/or as directed in sign criteria. Colors will be approved or determined during the time of submittal by the Landlord and City of Palm Desert. Tenants shall be required to conform to requirements and shall make necessary changes prior to written approval. A. Requirements 1. Store Front Signs. a) Size of store front signs shall be approximately 12" high, 3-1/2" thick, with an overall length of not more than 8'-0 of the frontage dimension as described in lease documents. b) Additional store front signs may be placed on side walls conforming to limits as set forth above. c) Letters may be individual block type or script and shall be constructed of wood. No neon tube signs shall -be allowed. d) Store front signs shall be suspended from exterior soffit above store front glass and shall be approximately centered and/or on wood wall adjacent to store. Either location shall be approved by Landlord. i 1979 _PT CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPAR FMZIAT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EXHIBIT NO. ........ CASE NO. __ AL-5.. G....._. -.r ls�- rQTagj,6—. ry4, of rv< -rHg M r- F m m 0 z rn IR 0 B E IR T H. ARIX C C I Alt ID X A. I. A. & ASSOCIATES 73-700 HIGHWAY I., PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA :3"3 - 2212 W) s -- ,ZTf 4 0 CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES EXHIBIT tlO. %ASE ENO. riG. " l C ` N 11979 ENW'.v.6.I .NTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSI�1.6,. RESOLUTION NO. 491r' re STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 05-79 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all plans submitted in behalf of thise case and as revised according to the Design Review Board process and/or Planning Commission action. Any minor changes requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Planning Commission. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as aprt of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. Any roof mounted, exhaust, or air conditioning equipment shall be fully concealed from view from any public rights -of -way and adjoining properties by architecturally integrated means. 5. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 7. All existing electrical distrubtion lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed, shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 8. Traffic control provisions shall be provided as required bi the Director of Public Works. 9. The Fire Protection Requirements as specified in the Fire Marshal's memo dated April 11, 1979 and attached hereto, shall apply. 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley County Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Dept. of Building & Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith.. 11. Applicant shall pay fees into the Palm Desert Planned Local Drainage Facilities Fund in an amount to be determined by the provisions of Ordinance No. 175. 12. Development shall pay the required Signalization fees to the City of Palm Desert as specified by the Director of Public Works. PLANNING COMMISSIr, RESOLUTION NO. 49 SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 05-79 1. Install safety street lighting at entrance on E1 Paseo and entrance on Highway 111 to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. This development shall provide cross access to the west at the time of development of the westerly property. 3. The applicant shall agree to provide a common driveway with the property to the west on Highway 111 if deemed desirable by the City of Palm Desert, when a plan for said property is' submitted for approval._ Cost of redesign work to be borne by property owner of this development. 4. The applicant shall record a parcel map splitting the developed property from the undeveloped westerly property; or provide further documents acceptable to the City of Palm Desert. 5. The project shall be constructed in one phase unless otherwise authorized through Design Review process. 6. Design Review of the project shall give attention to maximum screening and buffering of the loading area for the supermarket. 7. There shall be "Right Turn Only" ingress and egress at Highway 111 entrance. 8. Final design of the drive -up window for the savings and loan, if permitted, shall be subject to approval through the Design Review process. 9. Parking lot lighting shall be the same as utilized in the commercial development to the east. 10. A bond, for a raised median on Highway 111 along the frontage of the property, to be filed with the City of Palm Desert prior to occupancy; bond amount to be to satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 11. The elevations for the savings and loan building shall utilize the same architectural style, materials and colors as the market and shops. 12. The final design of the market loading area shall be subject to approval through the Design Review process. 13. Provide landscaping areas in walkway in front of shops and market. 14. Truck unloading (deliveries) shall be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily. 15. The east -west alignment of the market shall be moved northerly so that a minimum setback of 30 ft. shall be maintained. :LANNING COMMISSION iESOLUTION NO. 490 Reference: Case No Gentlemen: DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY DP 05-79 DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN P.O. BOX 24B 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE 17141 657-3183 April 11, 1979 Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow for a three (3) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located,closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the priginal will be returned to the developer. ' 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 05-79 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. Market building shall be fully protected with an automatic fire sprinkler system. 7. Fire lanes may be required for access to buildings. Very truly yours, DaL. Flake it Chief David J. Ortegel Fire Marshal DJO:dt d R E C ,4Y 7 3 Z 13 APR 19 19i0 ENVInO!`1 1EIiT.^:L SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT E C�,&UE E�U 2PQ)MRE ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Gerald J. Chazan Applicant ( please print) 431 N. Brand Boulevard Mailing Address Glendale, California Citv State REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) Site plan approval and architectural elevation PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: val. E1 Paseo and Highway 111 next to Palms to Pines Shopping Center ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. Parcel P4ap No. 14647 EXISTING ZONING 213-246-7268 Telephone 91203 Zip -Code Property Owner Authorization THE SIG ST S THAT ARE THE OWNER IS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZA N R FIL OF THI PP CATION. SG TUREI DA AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESEPI OF A LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE T AG EM ENT ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBE HEREIN. /0 !8 1 SIGNATURE 15ATE Applicants Signature !0 /8 ,.• SIGNATURE GATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. Np. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION 0 OTHER 50'p�TfO CASE No. �� S REFERENCE CASE NO.�� D P os 7 9 0 a 31 rl 1 \V �Wm l c')H HEATH � CI�OMPANY D I S T I N C T I V E E L E C T R I C A L A D V E R T I S I N G S T 0 R E F R 0 N T M 0 D E R N I Z A T 1 0 N 3225 LACY ST. • LOS ANGELES 90031 • CAPITOL 34141 GI97 r bit I N PIVI 0'Ak r>'J)Ni�✓ ��i�T ' V�/ ITI� Ga? 14 ;&) r4x r&/V ' %, �U�VI V' N ,� �' l�l�(,�I✓ rv'fNr'� ���v'`r; �� ��, JG4 � r'✓�I� >'P�(-�!'� �r�l ���'`/�1('(� �il.�a✓�' ����';�✓ ICI'( ����r I,.'��,��.., ~. -IViCES :naf'-,-* - , , ❑ C.C. RES. NO- ❑ P.C. RES. NO. LETTER ACTION I F-O�RM�/y� 131 ------- / m C01,1MENCE WITHIN ODIE YEAR OF THIS AP7ROVAL M. �%'✓ '/ I `' ` ✓ ��� GR�I fD NH;'�. SGIE I I SnEET M0. LpATIDN pawn er suEswn CITY OF PALM DESERT DZPARTMENT OF Ef\'J;Z-NN NTAL SERVICES EXHIBIT NO. CASE r cc9 NOTE- THIS IS AN ORIGINAL UNPUBLISHED DRAWING, CREATED BY HEATH AND COMPANY. IT IS SUBMITTED FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE, IN CONNECTION WITH A PROJECT BEING PLANNED FOR YOU BY HEATH AND COMPANY. IT IS NOT TO BE SHOWN TO ANYONE OUTSIDE YOUR ORGANIZATION, NOR IS IT TO BE USED, REPRODUCED, COPIED OR EXHIBITED IN ANY FASHION. T 1 _ _ \°?o P,a l2 CE L Oz- :GAF? c cL N-,4 =1 C O I\ I � . i , 1 I l L/A)F- OF CANOP- ALTERNATE L.00. i HHATH 4& COMPANY' D I S T I N C T I V E E L E C T R I C A L A D V E R T I S I N G S T O R E F R O N T M O D E R N I Z A T I O N f 3225 LACY ST. • LOS ANGELES 90031 . CAPITOL 34141 MOTE: THIS IS AN ORIGINAL UNPUBLISHED DRAWING, CREATED BY HEATH AND COMPANY. IT IS SUBMITTED FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE, IN CONNECTION WITH A PROJECT BEING PLANNED FOR YOU BY HEATH AND COMPANY. IT IS NOT TO BE SHOWN TO ANYONE OUTSIDE(YOUR ORGANIZATION, NOR IS IT TO BE USED, REPRODUCED, COPIED OR EXHIBITED IN ANY FASHION. "AFEV/AY STORE �275 /r 3 LOCATION FALM DESERT CA. ,4 O ' 6NEEi l4 `=NT uRlm+u worn n suESIUN 461794 1