Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout132C BANK OF INDIO AND IRA JOHNSON AIAGt:(2�zr =o cgo=x�al'D'ch' 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO: 132 C APPLICANT: Bank of Indio and Ira Johnson, AIA NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final working drawings for bank. LOCATION: 73-301 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1, S.P. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and by the applicant, the Design Review Board Approved this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: October 28, 1980 Vote: 6-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: See attached minutes. MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY OCTOBER 28, 1980 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAilBERS ****************************x************ I. The meeting was called to order at 2:3U P.M. after a 1z hour study session. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT: AL COOK RICK HOLDEN BERNIE LEUNG PHYLLIS JACKSON CHARLES MARTIN ERIC JOHNSON VERN BANTON PHIL DRELL On a motion by Holden, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the minutes of October 7, 198U, as written. Carried 4-0-2 (Cook, Holden, Leung, Jackson, with Martin and Johnson abstain- ing). II. Minute motion approving cases found acceptable at study session: None III. CASES: Case No. 132 C - BANK OF INDIO - Approval of final working drawings for Bank at 73-301 Highway ill; Ray Howard was present. The Board reviewed the submitted working drawings and felt they were acceptable. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to approve this request. Carried 6-0 (LOOK, Holden, Leung, Jackson, Martin, Johnson) Case No. 120 C - ERNEST W. HAHN, INC.- Approval of Final Mali Landscaping plans -and felt they were acceptable. Larry Moline was present. The Board reviewed the submitted Mall landscaping plans and felt they were accept able. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Leung, the Board moved to approve this request as submitted. Carried 6-0 (Cook, Holden, Leung, Jackson, Martin, Johnson) Case No. 100 C - DUNHAM CONSTRUCTION c/o BOB SHERIFF- Approval of Sign Program for San Luis Rey commercial complex at Southwest corner of San Luis Rey and El Paseo; Bob Sheriff was present. The Board reviewed the submitted plans and found them to be insufficient. The applicant was directed to resubmit complete architectural elevations showing the location and size of each sign. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to continue this item at the next meeting on November 10, 1980. Carried 6-0 (Cook, Holden, Leung, Jackson, Martin, Johnson) Case No. 62 C - ROGER FULLER c/o BUB SHERIFF- Approval of Sign Program for a commercial complex at the southeast corner of Ocotillo Drive and E1 Paseo; Bob Sheriff was present. The Board reviewed the submitted plans and found them to be insufficient. The applicant was directed to resubmit complete architectural elevations showing the location and size of each sign. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to continue this matter to the next meeting of November 10, 198U. Carried 6-0 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, Leung, Martin, Johnson) _4 AGENDA ITEM NO. III A-1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 132 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) BANK OF INDIO, (81-703 Highway 111, Indio, Calif. 92201) and IRA JOHNSON, AIA (73-960 Hwy. 111, Palm Desert, Calif. 92260). NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Approval of Final Working Drawings for Bank. LOCATION 73-301 Highway 111, Palm Desert, Calif. 92262 ZONE C-1 S.P. The applicant is requesting approval of final working drawings for a two-story bank building. The project received preliminary approval from ORB June 10, 1980, subject to the following conditions: 1. Final working drawings to indicate double striping and directional strip- ing. 2. Prior to submission of final working drawings, the applicant shall receive approval by the Director of Public Works of Ordinance No. 221, regarding prevention of flood damage. 3. Short screen wall or dense landscaping hedge to be provided adjacent to Frontage Road to screen parking lot. 4. Temporary bank building to require approval of a Temporary Use Permit. 5. Seventy-five percent of trees around perimeter of site to be 24" box size or larger with remainder to be 15 gallons in size. Interior trees to have a minimum of 60% at 24" box size or larger with remainder 15 gallons in size. 6. Applicant to provide sign program with final working drawings; at the time final working drawings are submitted, applicant shall clarify whether building is to be multi -tenant use or not. 7. Planter curb breaks shall be provided on final working drawings so that parking aisle can be extended to both the east and west. 8. Trash area to be designed to provide pedestrian access without opening trash enclosure door. 9. Temporary paving or permanent paving shall be provided so that a total of 24 feet of pavement is provided behind the southerly row of parking spaces in the alley area. STAFF ANALYSIS: The applicant has complied with all conditions except No. 6. The Bank has yet to determine if other tenants will use the building. The only sign to be considered as part of the final drawings is the Bank Logo on the wall. Final approval should be made subject to submission of a revised sign program if it is to be multi tenant, prior to the completion of construction. r MINUTES CJESIGN REVIEW BOARD JUNE 10, 1980 Page Four III. CASES (Continued) - KAUFMAN AND -BROAD (Continued) 3. Twenty foot di ce to be provided from closest unit to east property line. 4. A written and recor ermanent easement for blowsand protection along the west boundary shall be su ted to Staff prior to approval of final working drawings. 5. Blowsand protection to be provided he north side with easements provided where necessary; blowsand protection may modified at northwest corner of project. 6. Ten open parking spaces near main pool area to be ided as approved in original Development Plan. 7. Visitor parking lane to provide stacking for at least 80 fee 8. Light detail for lights on walls to be submitted with final work drawings. 9. All applicable conditions of DP 01-80 and TT 14080 shall be complie 'th. Carried 3-0 (Holden, Jackson, Martin). Case No. 132 C BANK OF INDIO and IRA JOHNSON - preliminary approval of plans or wo-s ory bank building on the south side of State Highway 111, approximately 250 feet east of Sage Lane; James Huffman and Ray Howard were present. The Board reviewed the revised plans and Staff Report. The applicant submitted a letter from the Palm Desert Property Owners Association indicating approval of the permanent building. It was noted that the temporary building was not approved by the Association. The Board felt that the drive-thru teller lanes and planters between parking walls were acceptable as submitted. Staff noted that the free-standing sign was not permissible in a multi -tenant building. The applicant indicated that the bank may take the whole building. Therefore, it was determined that the sign program not be approved at this time. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Martin, the Board moved to grant preliminary approval of plans for the bank, subject to the following conditions: 1. Final working drawings to indicate double striping and directional striping. 2. Prior to submission of final working drawings, the applicant shall receive approval by the Director of Public Works of Ordinance No. 221, regarding prevention of flood damage. 3. Short screen wall or dense landscaping hedge to be provided adjacent to Frontage Road to screen parking lot. 4. Temporary bank building to require approval of a Temporary Use Permit. 5. Seventy-five percent of trees around perimeter of site to be 24" box size or larger with remainder to be 15 gallons in size. Interior trees to have a minimum of 60% at 24" box size or larger with remainder 15 gallons in size. 6. Applicant to provide sign program with final working drawings; at the time final working drawings are submitted, applicant shall clarify whether building is to be multi -tenant use or not. 7. Planter curb breaks shall be provided on final working drawings so that park- ing aisle can be extended to both the east and west. 8. Trash area to be designed to provide pedestrian access without opening trash enclosure door. 9. Temporary paving or permanent paving shall be provided so that a total of 24 feet of pavement is provided behind the southerly row of parking spaces in the alley area. Carried 3-0 (Holden, Jackson, Martin). 211 MF - JOHN MANDIC - preliminary and final approval of plans for duplex unit at the s rner of Royal Palm Drive and Las Palmas Avenue; John Mandic was present. The Board reviewed the submitted plans and it wa-9' s that an application was previously denied for this site by the Board. The applican ained what he had done to the revised plan. The Board indicated additional lan s should be provided along the westerly side of the property. a" Round Drawings Specifications See page 12 for photometrics c 111'''✓ .; _. LG 7 ,&4iv4 Specifications Cr/Np/ o Post Construction —One piece extruded aluminum, .125" wall thickness, with heavy cast aluminum twist -lock anchor base concealed within the post. Plastic Enclosure —One piece extruded, optically clear, 100%virgin acrylic, 1/4" nominal wall, retained in an unstressed position by internal support through the reflector assembly. Top Cap —One piece heavy gauge spun aluminum, retained by 2 counter sunk captive socket head fasteners, and braced at the outer edges by the optical assembly. 3/4" thick insulation provided above lamp. Optical Assembly—Preclsion hydroformed optical louvers with specular Alzak* finish, mounted and removable as a one piece self-contained unit. Socket —Porcelain with nickel plated lamp grip screw shell, rated 600 volts. A special 5KV pulse rated socket will be provided for all High Pressure Sodium lamps. 36' Light Car He ght 1`/1, Anchor Bo Prgect,on concrete Footing By Others 31, Cm1om1 Gasketing—Fixture is fully gasketed for weathertight operation. Wiring —Supplied with high temperature socket leads for field connection to the prewired ballast components Ballast —High power factor for —20°F. starting, factory mounted to the anchor base, and pre -wired. Anchor Bolts —Supplied with four %" x 10" + 2" zinc electro-plated L hook anchor bolts, each with 2 nuts and washers, and a rigid pressed board template. Finish —Standard finish is baked enamel. Optional anodized finishes are available in accordance with Architectural Class I specifications. Certification —All electrical components are U.L. listed. Photometric data provided by an established and certified independent laboratory. LA 830-4 Kim Lighting, Inc. Lpr� Round Catalog Numbers v Finishes continued Options Ordering Guide Fixture Catalog Numbers Fixture Line Ballast Line Operating Starting Lamp (by others) Cat. No. Volts Type Watts Amps Amps opt150W.Incandescent B30-100 120 NA NA NA NA A-21 I.F. 28501umens 75W. Mercury Vapor, 830-200 120 93 0.82 0.80 Deluxe White, E-17 B30-201 208 CWA 93 0.48 0.46 2800 lumens 830-202 240 93 0.41 0.40 B30-203 277 93 0.36 0.35 100W, Mercury Vapor, B30-205 120 118 1.05 1.00 Deluxe White, E-231h B30-206 208 CWA 118 0.60 0.58 4200lumens B30-207 240 118 0.52 0.50 67n-208 277 118 0.45 0.43 70W.High Pressure B30-400 120 88 0.81 0.75 Sodium, diffuse coated, 830-401 208 HX-HPF 88 0.47 0.45 h E-23'.54001umens 830-402 240 88 0.40 0.37 B30-403 277 88 0.35 0.35 *Catalog number includes CWA = Constant wattage autotransformer, high complete fixture, ballast, power factor (90% or better) —20°F. anchor bolts and template, starting. and standard finish. HX-HPF = High reactance, high power factor (90% or better) —20°F. starting. Standard Baked Enamel Finishes Optional Anodized Finishes Included in fixture price. Extra Cost, consult local representative. Cat. No. - Description Cat. No. Description BL-E Black BL-A Black DB-E Dark Bronze, resembles 313 Duranodic, DB-A Dark Bronze - in color. MB-A Medium Bronze MB-E Medium Bronze, resembles 312 Duranodic' in color. Optional House Side Shield Extra cost, consult local representative. / For elimination of back light in unwanted areas such (/ as adjacent property, or wherever an asymmetric light distribution is desired. Constructed of sheet aluminum covering a 1600 arc, and finished to match the fixture. `R Shield is fully adjustable about a 3600 rotation. See page 16 for photometrics. Catalog designation HS - Ordering Guide B30-400/B L-A/H S "Alzak" and "Duranodic" are trademarks of Alcoa. In- "Y L,.N ..p"., `v. 4 n„`p�.N4 I,d, I,. .f 10S #. F ,4 .. •,� :' 4H� d d � $"�*xis` fi t4 d� '; '� "` ' c. f ♦ i •„' N< .. -0001 .. _ /fb} 4` _ &. .s s Exclusive Features Patent Pending f 6 W8 t5 f.�Ud 1 !ti C IHfif Yy . .- •.a. ill I ,„.y. �f=-F ' !3fc 14Mo"mg M.,9 3fc tic Oc 1fc 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' 35gned't0•'t7'fOvida bread illumination at lowttounting` lignt8, (8'"to-16'), while controlling glare through light cut- at high angles. High ?ighting performance is achieved r a compact. Reverse DraftReflector Systotn"that od uces d wide throw Type V distribution with excellent are controland uniformity. 'Ths.Rrtversg'i5`raft 'A6`ff ntor System Is awfllable In an zz �sy, tricaI version thaA produces an ou standing ANSI Type Ill It dlstrlbutio l Broad pole spacings can be 8chieved at low mount; =g heights for street fighting, malt " L ,rttill or parkIng.lot lighting. Excellent street -'sfde9ight. ` ' •thrCi ' leaohievad with house -side cut off occurring behind': ,^ ' th;z:sida+Natk'tine. !'he VWTC is a clean and simple verticaV To m, that will enhance anystreet-scape by blending 11 1�4,00h ebai {�r ian,p replacement, or cleaning of fhe,aeryuc. own Roo1m, ►1�WERNMOMM I�INIOR _ai®!�ilk Kim Lighting, Inc. a1 - 1 Fixtures Specifications Pole arm mounts Wall arm mounts Housing —Shall be heavy gauge spun aluminum, hinged and secured with two (2) captive fasteners concealed in a deep recess. Housing shall be supported by steel tubes within chrome plated spacer sleeves. Reflector —reverse draft system comprised of a two piece, specular Alzak� spun aluminum assembly. Reflectors for Types M and S distributions shall have asymmetric components. Lens —Shall be vacuum formed, UV stabilized, 100% virgin clear acrylic. Lens shall be retained and sealed with temperature and weather resistant closed cell neoprene gaskets. Optional Lexan® lens available. Luminake Pole Fitter —Constructed of cast aluminum, it shall be rigidly mounted to the pole via an internal expansion wedge grip, and secured with a single concealed center bolt. Socket —Shall be porcelain with nickel plated lamp grip screw shell, and rated for 600 volts. A special 5KV pulse rated socket will be provided for all High Pressure Sodium lamps. Ballast —Mounted in pole, high power factor, for —20°F. starting. Ballast shall be securely fastened to the pole fitter and shall be equipped with anti - vibration snubbers to prevent contact with pole inner wall. (See catalog B20 for details). Wiring—Luminaire shall be prewired with high temperature leads terminating at the luminaire pole fitter. Finish—Luminaire shall be finished with a baked -on melamine modified acrylic enamel, applied over mil spec 15328 acid wash primer. Lighting Performance —With a symmetrical reflector system, the luminaire light distribution shall be ANSI Type V Cut -Off. With the asymmetrical reflector, light distribution shall be ANSI Type III Cut -Off for clear lamps, and ANSI Type 8 Cut -Off for phosphor coated lamps. Certification —All electrical fixture components shall be U.L. listed. Photometric data shall be provided by an established and certified independent testing laboratory. Pole Arm Mount —Arms are rectangular aluminum extrusions welded to round extruded aluminum riser tubes. All welds shall be ground smooth and blended into a one-piece look. Riser tubes will be furnished in the proper diameter to contain the necessary ballast and to accommodate the luminaire fitter. Ballasts are secured to prevent contact with riser walls. Each arm shall be secured to a pole cleat which automatically aligns and levels the. assembly. Standard finish will be baked -on melamine modified acrylic enamel, applied over mil spec 15328 acid wash primer. Arm assemblies are furnished partially prewired with a quick disconnect plug for connection to a matching pale plug. Wall Arm Mount —Riser and arm details shall be the same as described for pole arms. A cast aluminum mounting plate shall be provided for fastening to the wall. A cast aluminum canopy with welded arm mounting cleat shall be affixed to the wall mounting plate. Connections to the luminaire shall be made with quick disconnect plugs and an access plate shall be provided for splice inspection. A recessed ring groove is cast in the wall mounting plate for applying a caulking type gasketing material furnished to seal around the outlet box. • • Lighting, Inc. z g"f Pressure Sod, V.x e:, lat {tat footcandles at, wz, InIl. _ eaKabta }G corr 'on factory a^ it; , ,s s 1 77 38 4 1.6 Ilk r- 1. 1 ___. .. A; i N � `�: a. fir. �•- - �'/ i m ngttu'in. distance in units of mounting heights .. 3W. Hi-li Pressure Sodium -. " • -' "': footcandies at listed mounting he _. , r is lG:!actors to Jthp, modes - s <i 5 2.1 1.1 .80 !- Flx',.� do mrar and cnnd,a-p^' l=rv..:and14 ona c n.:'. -_ 21, p .' C01V 7.., arr i (' iampai y cA 2 " h Ia w 1 a distance in units of rnounfipg Neigh+:- b, 'ou asoo aoue/a}as ,1 o ON 3Sd� 08V09 M31A38 N91S30 G7 va t/�� M31 A3 N 3d V1S Ej L —✓ Aq paldaooV AINO 3sn 33V1S 803) 31VO 31YO 'N13U3H 03aIU0S30 A183d0Ud 3H1 01 318V011ddV 39 AtlW 1yH1 SN of Ul —S300330 IINV ONIOUy03U 93111119yll lly 401tl3S30 Wlyd d0 A110 3H1 3Al Say 'suol{olAisp pasp Auo o; SA14DIOA s 31y0 80V SIHI NO 3ar ID JO ;JOSOO WIDd 10 91-4*UDIS c,{uo*!lady INOIS AN AS 00 1 3 844 6ulAlosgo;uawaaJ6 X '-011M 14au 6144 ;a bullli eV{ JDi uul{*ziJdylnV •elb AqucV Duo uluiV peq P*saD A1Jed*Jd 041 /* (s)nuMO 041 *JD AaVI;DV; $0111 DDublunpun 841 UOIJDZIJOq;0VA0uM0 A;JadoJd SNINOZ E)NIISIX3 YnV� 'ON 130NVd S,80SS3SSV (s;eeJ;s o; U01401 J ul U01ID001 JO'SWDU 4oe(o1d/6ulppnq 1'ou e;lns'sselppD;aeJ;S) NOI1V001 N'OIS 6 suoVdy ele / M. /orz,6 quoticrojel tvS v - &F (S) N91S d0 3()1VA 031VWI1S3 ( (s) u61s eq; Jo esodlnd puo edA; eq(JoseO) MnO38 NOIS C�w���® � S30LA8]S _lViN3WN081ANO N3ISIAICI 30 1N31Ni2JVd30 �o� �o���D�� 09ZZ6 'VO 183S30 W-lVd 13NV-1 NV3d KIAOIad 6LZ-9b 1 40 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 18, 1980 Page Four ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------ Ix. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Consideration of cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of June 10, 1980. Case No. 210 MF - Mr. Sawa explained that this was previously approved as a Development Plan. He stated that the Design Review Board reviewed the plan and recommended some revisions be made. He reviewed those revisions. Case No. 132 Mr. Sawa stated that the Design Review Board approved this case with several modifications. He discussedthose modifications. Case No. 211 MF - Mr. Sawa stated that the Design Review Board granted preliminary and final approval with revisions. He reviewed the revisions and recommended approval. Vice Chairman Kryder asked about the continuity of the parkinq lot in the mid -block area between El Paseo and Hwy 111. Mr. Sawa illustrated on the map how the parking would be tired in together with existing parking spaces. Motion was made by Commissioner McLachlan, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the Design Review Board cases by adoption of Planning Commission Resolu- tion No. 611. Carried unanimously (3-0). A. Continued Discussion - General Plan Update: Transportation/ Circulation and Urban Design Elements. The Commission deferred discussion on the elements until the July 16, 1980, meeting. B. Distribution of Planning, Zoning and Development Laws - 1980 Edition. No discussion. XI. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - NONE XII. COMMENTS Mr. Crump advised the Commission that an appeal to the City Council on the determination to adopt a Negative Declaration for Case Nos. C/Z 01-80, DP 07-80 & CUP 07-80 (Hubbard) had been received from Wayne Barlow. There were comments by the Commission in regards to the Public Hearing on Proposition "A" Assessment and assessment rates. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner McLachlan, to adjourn the meeting at 3:23 P.M. Carried unanimously (3-0). ATTEST: CHARLES MILLER, Chairman PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary L\ µ PALM DESERT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION PALM DESERT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION 73.833 L.I. PASEO PALM DESER"I,CALIFORNIA 42260 LELEPHONE 34b-2804 A Non-P►olit Corporation 5 June 1'Q8'1 ,j% nr• Tr,,110 1 _7rt3 u1.�h`vav 111 .ir?io- ra1if. r,2'fl rl — Lot-, ?/11/5 tlrtit 1 -ontlemer, T-is is to Inform -nu that It thn me(-ting* of the Architectura l 0or mi-ttee of the "'alm Desert I ropr,rt,r ')wners Pgsociatton helLi :Jednesdav June 4, 1080 that rnur r1an: for a Dank 1, linT were Riven nreliminary annroval. vour nlans for a temnorar- struoture were not annrove,l. 3" t ;. ^'he eommit,tee suarrest a re -stud'? of the architecture to conform with the nualitV of the rermanent neighborhood structures. Also, tine temnorary or nre 'abrieatpri nature and location of buildi.nn in a dedicated easement mrtst have annrovalof the Roard of Directors of the valm Desert vrorerty Owners Association. `lobert I. °itchford RIn ks Architectural Committee Chairman w J Sa e e ° 0. / 73-260 73-261 ^ 73-290 3 .p3 73-290 ` " 73- F .., 11414 73-300 N Q 73-29/ — o \ 73- ; a 73-310 1311. h V 73-330 73-34s a 7.3-347 f VI 0 i 73-350 73-385 % I z PO. D7 N ` 73-359 " k _ 410 uas S�// d09 4071 L 73- 397 _ _ _ _ — .I 0 I ;I L 1 S'O V h n I la. Be 13° s o e 73-47o i I 0 �^ 1 4� � I � o O 73.500 I L-- Y9 A�e 9 "1 • 01. M Gfllu" off le Innua 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE June 19, 1980 APPLICANT Bank of Indio 81-703 Hiahwav 111 Indio, CA 92201 CASE NO: 132 C The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at is meeting of June 18, 1980 CONTINUED TO DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 611 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. cc: A plicant 6��xgxM. File Ira Johnson, AIA PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 611 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION AT THEIR MEETING OF JUNE 10, 1980. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of June 10, 1980, approving: Case No. 210 MF - Preliminary plans for 47 unit condominium project on the north side of Hovley Lane, approximately 2,250 feet east of Monterey Avenue for KAUFMAN AND BROAD. Case No. 132 C - Preliminary plans for two-story bank on the south side of Highway 111, approximately 250 feet east of Sage Lane for the BANK OF INDIO. Case No. 211 MF - Preliminary and final plans for duplex at the southeast corner of Royal Palm Drive and Las Palmas Avenue for JOHN MANDIC. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board action of June 10, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of June 10, 1980. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 18th day of June, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Berkey, Kryder, McLachlan, Richards NOES: None ABSENT: Miller ABSTAIN: None CHARLES MILLER, CHAIRMAN IATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY /dj .; n NDA ITEM NO. III, 8-3 DATE June 10, 1980 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 132 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Bank of Indio, Attn: James Huffman (81-703 Hwy 111, Indio, CA 92201) and Ira Johnson, AIA (73-960 Hwy 111, NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary approval of plans for a 2-story bank buildi LOCATION South side of State Hwy 111, approx. 250 ft.east of Sage Lane ZONE S.P. This item was originally heard at the meeting of May 27, 1980. At that time it was determined that Palm Desert Property Owners Association approval should be obtained prior to review of this project of the Board. Additionally, a number,of design concerns were voiced by the Board members and staff. Attached are the Minutes from that meeting which list the design concerns. The applicant has redesigned his plans and made some modifications. Essen- tially the building has been flipped, the driveway along the westerly property line and drive-thru modified to provide adequate stacking area. The trash area has been relocated to the back of the lot where it is more accessible. As previously indicated the site is located between the Walker and Lee building and El Cafe De Mexico. The proposed construction consist of a 2-story bank building containing 7700 sq. ft. of floor space. It has not been clarified whether the second floor will be used for tenant spaces or by the bank. The structure will be located a minimum of 5 ft. from the street property line. The applicants wish to utilize a temporary bank building near the rear of the lot. This bank will be used until construction of the permanent bank. This would require approval of a Temporary Use Permit. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the revised plans and would offer the following comments regarding revisions and code requirements: 1. The planter between the double row of parking spaces should be at least 6 ft. in width because of the use of 2 ft. overhang for each set of parking stalls. This could be accomplished by redesign of the building or elimination of one drive-thru auto teller lane. 2. The municipal code requirements states that parking spaces shall be double striped. This should be indicated on the final working drawings. 3. The subject property is located within the AO-2 zone as determined by the Federal Insurance Administration and as such requires comp- liance to Ord. No. 221, regarding prevention of flood damage. Prior to submission of final working drawings the applicant must receive approval by the Director of Public Works. 4. The municipal code requires that parking areas be screened from the street. In this case a short screened wall or dense lands- caping can be provided adjacent to the Highway. 5. The temporary bank, which the applicants proposed to use while the permanent structure is under construction, requires approval of a Temporary Use Permit by the Zoning Administrator. 6. The adopted development standards require that on the perimeter of the site, 75% of the trees are required to be 24" box size or larger with the remainder to be 15 gallons in size. On the interior of the site, a minimum of 60% of the trees shall be 24" box or larger, with the remainder 15 gallons in size. 7. A portion of the east elevation of the bulding abutts the property line. As such, there will be no landscaping adjacent to this wall. 8. If the building is a multi tenant building, the municipal code does not permit any free standing signs for the bank. The submitted plans do indicate a free standing sign. This will have to be clarified at the time final working drawings are approved. Additionally, any other signs, the applicant may wish to install, should be indicated on the final working drawings. 9. If tenants are anticipated on the second story, it will be necessary to show how signage will be provided for those tenants; said infor- mation should be provided at the time final working drawings are approved. 10. Planter curb breaks should be provided so that the parking isle can be extended to both the east and the west. 11. At the previous review, the Board indicated that the applicant should study the elevations for the shading of window areas along the east, west and south elevations. Revised elevations are the same as previously submitted with the exception of the flipping of the building. 12. The parking isle closest to the drive-thru lane does not provide any protection. It would be adviseable to provide a planter at the front of these stalls. This can be accomplished by the elimination of one drive-thru window. 13. The isles between the drive-thru lanes are shown at eight feet. This may be somewhat narrow when considering a parking space is required to be nine feet wide. 14. The trash area should be designed to provide pedestrian access without opening the trash door. 15. Temporary oil and rock paving should be utilized so that a total of 24 ft. is provided behind the southerly row of parking spaces. 16. The directional arrows shown in the driveway adjacent to Hwy 111 are reversed. Based on the above staff comments and code requirements the Board should review the submitted plans to determine acceptability. Should the Board determine that these plans are acceptable, Staff will forward the Board recommendation to the Planning Commission for confirmation. 'MINUTES ` DESIGN• REVIEW BOARD May 27, 1980 Page Two Case No. 208 MF - DAVID HEUSINKVELD c/o HARRY H. SCHMITZ - Preliminary and final approval of plans to construct carports and new parking spaces for residential development located at 73-415 Shadow Mountain Dr. Harry Schmitz was present. The Board indicated that the property is located within the Palm Desert Property Owners Association area and as such should be approved by that body. The Board felt that Property Owners Association approval should precede Board approval. Additionally, the Board indicated that the plans as submitted did not provide enough detail. The applicant asked that the plans be approved as submitted. On a motion by Barton, seconded by Martin, the Board continued this item to June 10, 1980, in order to allow the applicant to receive Property Owners Association approval. Additionally, they stated that new plans should be submitted indicating the following: 1. An enlarged plot plan of the parking lot area including the front setback. 2. Elevation view from the front and side of the proposed carports. 3. Enlarged plot plan to study detail on how screen wall will fit in with existing project. Carried 5-0 (Barton, Cook, Holden, Jackson, Martin) Case No. 132 C - BANK OF INDIO AND IRA JOHNSON, AIA - Preliminary approval for plans for 2-story bank building on south side of Hwy 111, approximately 250 feet east of Sage Lane; Ray Howard and Jim Hoffman were present. The Board reviewed the plans submitted by the applicant and noted that the property is within the Palm Desert Property Owners Association area. As such they felt that Homeowner Association approval shouldprecede Board review. Additionally, a number of concerns of the Board were noted. These concerns are in addition to those noted in the staff report. Major concern of the Board pertained to the overall circulation and functioning of the parking lot and drive-thru teller lanes. Additionally, changes were suggested regarding landscaping and trash provisions. It was noted that the large expanse of window area should be restudied to provide shading of the windows on the south, east and west sides. The Board suggested flipping the entry of the structure to the west side. It was noted that these changes should be incorporated into the plans reviewed by the Homeowners Association. On a motion by Barton, seconded by Martin, The Board moved to continue this item to allow Property Owners Association approval to be obtained. The applicant agreed to this continuation. Additionally, revised plans should be submitted incorporating the following changes as applicable: 1. Changes as recommended in the staff report dated May 27, 1980, should be incorporated as applicable; those revisions which pertain to final approval can wait until final drawings are started. 2. Restudy overall circulation of bank considering switching direction of teller windows, eliminating one drive-thru lane in order to provide additional planter area, and protection for first row of parking spaces next to teller drive-thru lanes. 3. Restudy site plan considering flipping the structure to provide driveway to Hwy ill on west side of site. 4. Provide planter curb breaks so that parking isle can be extended to east and west. 5. Relocate trash area to be more accessible to trash trucks. 6. Restudy elevations to provide for shading of window area along east, west and south elevations. Carried 5-0 (Barton, Cook, Holden, Jackson, Martin) ONDA ITEM NO. III, B-2 DATE May 27, 1980 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 132 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Bank of Indio, Attn: James Huffman -703 Hwy 111, Indio, CA 92201) and Ira Johnson, AIA (73-960 Hwy 111, .., . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary approval of plans for a 2-story bank building. LOCATION South side of State Hwy 111, approx. 250' east of Sage Lane. ZONE S.P. The proposed construction consist of a 2-story bank building containing 7700 sq. ft. of floor space. The first floor will be used by the Bank of Indio, while the second floor will be available for office use. The structure will be located a minimum of 5' from the street property line with access to the street along the easterly property line. The site is located between the Walker and Lee building and E1 Cafe De Mexico. The applicants wish to utilize a temporary bank structure near the rear of the lot. This bank would be used until construction of the permanent bank. This requires approval of a Temporary Use Permit. Adequate parking is provided for the use with the layout design to be compatible with adjacent parking lots. Four drive-thru lanes will be provided at the rear of the structure. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the submitted plans and would offer the following comments regarding revisions and code requirements: 1. The planter between the double wall of parking spaces should be 6 feet in width because of the use of a 2' overhang for each set of stalls. This may be accomplished by a redesign of the building or elimination of one drive-thru auto teller. 2. The Municipal Code requires that parking spaces be doubled striped. This should be indicated on final working drawings. 3. The subject property is located within the AO-2 Zone as determined by the Federal Insurance Administration and as such requires compliance to Ordinance No. 221 regarding prevention of flood damage. Prior to submission of final working drawings the appli- cant must receive approval by the Director of Public Works of Ordinance No. 221. 4. The Municipal Code requires that the parking area be screened from the street. This can be achieved through the use of a short screen wall or dense landscaping hedge. 5. The temporary bank which the applicants propose to use while the permit structure is under construction, requires approval of a Temporary Use Permit by the Zoning Administrator. Additionally, a trash enclosure should be provided for the temporary bank structure. 6. The adopted Development Standards require that on the perimeter of the site 75% of the tree should be 24" box size or larger with the remainder to be 15 gallons in size. On the interior of the site a minimum of 60% of the trees shall be 24" box or larger with the remainder a minimum 15 gallons in size. 0 Y 7. In order to facilitate safe ingress and egress the first parking space adjacent to the driveway to Hwy 111 should be\eliminated. 8. The drive-thru auto teller location does not allow for adequate stacking area. Because of the location it is conceivable that traffic will back-up and create vehicular conflicts with vehicle utilizing the parking lot. 9. A portion of the west elevation of the building abutts the property line. As such there will be no on -site landscaping provided. It should be noted that the Walker and Lee building does have a landscape planter along this property line. 10. Because of the multi -tenant nature of the building, the Municipal Code does not permit any free-standing signs for the bank. The plans submitted do indicate a free-standing sign. 11. The applicant's plans do not indicate how signage will be provided for the second story tenants. The applicants should provide this information to the Board for this meeting. 12. The Board should review the site plan layout in relationship to the buildings which exist on both sides of the site. E1 Cafe De Mexico is constructed on the property line while the Walker and Lee building is set back a substantial distance. In light of the above statements, and adopted Development Standards, the Board should review this project to determine acceptability. r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 546-0611 :REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO: 132 C APPLICANT: Ira Johnson AIA NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 2-story bank building.. LOCATION: South side of State Highway 111, approximately 250' east of Sage Lane ZONE: S.P. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon revie,riing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and' fy the a plicant, the Design Review Board continues this project, X�g� XVWX")W(MXWX Date of Action Vote: May 27, 1980 5-0 ")5XM�0xkxttxSXXXixRhxxawXXX kX (KX 'i(XX)[XXtxfXXxx (AXXXXXXxR)W ux)tka(xxx)mdx)�x-X(XXNX)=X Dxx STAFF COMMENTS: See attached minutes. Next meeting is June 10, and filing deadline is June 2. d 9 I O�ON/�14 81NOOP or tjIta L'Johwm A I A Ar uhlLer.6 ............ ,,. .. . Ilk N. .R 40•. 1,01/w pa0� do©o�1i dQBeo 1 I hlg)Mt r SIT 1 R' "" Ire L. Johnson, UIL AmAlrxi • Nlp(yl0 ytIwK1W 1AW R1N•.1. Jn 73, 250I e Jn 1N 1a I SO r 0. %3-2iO �� 73-2G1 O 73-280 u ® ry �13—z�4Y 73-290 73- 73-30o N 73-29/ ' 0 73-310 73- I3J la �y 73-320 It%°j73-325' 73-330 >, 73-34s 0 � 7.3-397 > mr a sl '3.320 - LV! //YL N CO.OB'JS' N LM/YL - 140i• a. - uas 1 73-397 1 73-397 0 A s� O S a•I a0 fix. ee la° 3-Q 70I a N n I 773,5 O00 u J; p 25-8-6 627— 20 TC.A. POR N 112 SW 114 SEC. 2C /" =1 /00' a 7 0 m a N N J N 3o I3o STATE HN M DESERT '07172- /070n- 707/74- T107208- /Oi/75- %07203 T — — — 11/60 9/an - I— m7l 111/ n � So /26 47 T ry 0 3 v ry 4 ro 5 h 6 ry ry 7 n N 8 M 0 O O O O O 2 cc �j01 L T5055 9O lO /l /8 0 /5 0.542-Ac. � 39 i N ry cv ry N M N c h 0 h MB 2//50-54 Palm Desert LOT - � f T SEfJ— Lor A Bq OO MRE ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION BANK of INDIO ]nt I please prior) 81-703 HIGHWAY 111 Mailing Address INDIO City CALIFORNIA State REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) 714/347-6156 Telephone 92201 Zip -Code Design Review Board approval of preliminary architecture and site planning and approval of temporary bank building. C PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lots 3,4&5 Block G, Palm Desert Unit #1, per MB 21/50, Riverside County records California. F &17 - ASSESSOR IS PARCEL N0. 201-03, 201-04, 201-05 EXISTING ZONING C-1 with SP Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER IS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FN,UeOFyiIS APPaATION_ SY� f� TUgE GATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING T OF PALM DESE F LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS, I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON T S EEMEN ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. SIGNATURE —T DATE Applicant's Sig re5�0 .r �y� SIGNATURE I DATE OR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ACCEPTED BY\\•'1 MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. E3 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CASE No. 132c. ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION 0 OTHER REFERENCE CASE NO. CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review Of: CASE NO. BANK and OFFICE BUILDING Type of Project BANK of INDIO, INDIO, CALIFORNIA (Applicant) Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest isting pole not on the property being developed as requi d ni ' al Code. nature —��— Date Department of Environmental Services Form 1 CASE NO. DESIGN REV:.EW BOARD CHECKLIST INITIAL PLAN REVIEW NOTE: Planning D'_vision Staff are required to reject app'_ications if any applicable exhibits a-e not received and checked. I. Completed Application Form (one (1) copy) II. Address labels for project sponsors (two (2) copies, gummed labels & typed list) Not required for a single-family dwelling application, or staff approved signs. III. Detailed Plot Plan A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/Approval A. �] - Three (3) full size (one (1) of which is to be colored) - One (1) reduced copy (81"x1l", or 1311) B. Staff Approval B. C] - Three (3) full size IV. Information Sheet and/or Plan Block V. Site Analysis & Preliminary Drainage and Grading Plan (Three (3) copies, may be com- bined, where appropriate, with plot plan) VI. Architectural Elevations (all sides of the building(s)) A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/ Approval A. . - Three (3) full size (one (1) of which is to be color keyed) - One (1) reduced copy (8J"xll" or 1311) B. Staff Approval B. l� - Three (3) full size DRB Checklist Page Two ** VII. Sign Program (elev�tion(s) and details, applicable) - Three (3) copies to scale VIII. Color and Material Exhibits - Color and Materials written description (one (1) copy) - Color and Materials sample board (max. 8"x1311, 3/8" thick) IX. Floor and Roof Plans - Three (3) copies to scale * X. Landscape Plan (3 copies, 1 colored) - Plant List, (1 copy) * XI. Exterior Lighting Plan (3 copies) XII. Filing Fee A. Commission Review/Approval ($50.00) A. B. Staff approval, single-family dwellings ($15.00) B. !_J C. Sign Program Only ($15.00 DRB or C. L—J $10.00 Staff) * Items X and XI may be combined. ** Sign Program only - submit items IIIB, VI, VII, VIII, and Sign Fee. Initial Plan Exhibits Received and Checked by: _.J __ Ping. Div. Staff Da": FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS I. Three (3) copies of drawings to be submitted for plan check. Drawings must reflect all Conditions of Approval. Final Construction Drawings Received by: / Ping. Div. Staff Dat. O �oN f�W- INplo I'N-M t�195F;vr tt C�Loffs J►'��Ti°�I- �4�If� Wes- IaUPF SAWN C=�*P/Nq rzUFjf shWN cPQ^jR yA&L 51ON 5 T7�r�t_ QIQ� TAN t5RCvN zP a> YVf\ -lc GTAIN # 71g 01-7NOic 57,N9 #71 J Lf (TIFFS - wHrrrm 73 960 HigNwAy ONE -ELEVEN, PRIM DESERT, CAVORMA 92260 - AREA CODE 714.346-5215 AT x C C- 2Z CID I I-___ "I ., El ti— og) Hwnr TT �,'V ul 0 z z p SHEET TITLE @a�c� (a 90OOi� p�a� drawn (checked revised JOB NAME address 4 Ire L. Johnson, A.I.A. Architect p & ASSOCIATES - ARCHITECTURE LAND PLANNING 73-960 HIGHWAY III PALM DESERT CALIFORNIA