Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout133C POUL MOLLERJOHN F. OUTCAULT ARCHITECT, A.I.A. HMS Plaza Suite 11 74-133 El Paseo PALM DESERT, CA 92260 (619) 346-0630 TO P6 &4, Djat 'f MAY 2 8 1987 t _. CCMMUNCI DOf PALME E Wo Cott Of PALM D£Sf�h WE ARE SENDING YOU le Attache El Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter d II_ Under separate cover via_ L! Prints C_'. Plans ❑ Change order ❑ c.J S' l ATTENTION •.l'1 JOB NO following items: El Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION ' I Y(Ann./Y1WG,(^ VIA^ JUT1Kg �4 a I 1 azm z 307 4 —`tea 2 0, ° THyESE�E T NWIT D as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ As requested For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS REMARKS C, Approved as submitted Approved as noted J Returned for corrections J Gony 'PIL}UL M O 1_1. e f2 r7 Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 n PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US 7rj p asp- ip@ I f SIGNED: weo ' yJ /� K �Pi y A5.p � • If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us of one $onrlirr of Contron STENVART TITLE COMPANY OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY 74-075 El PASEO, SUITE A 2A • P. 0. BOX 1801 • PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 TELEPHONE (619) 56B 1674 5/14/87 To Whom It May Concern, We certify that the attached property owner's lists are true and complete as provided by the 86/87 tax assessors rolls on the subject property, and the listing of property owners within 300 feet of the property involved is true and correct to the best of our knowledge. Sincerely, v Teri Larrazolo Customer Service Rep. coop'::;; "cCy$w 0,S J'i2NlG°P} 7:s t:� RONALD BUTTON JAN MITCHELL 700 S. FLOWER 595 MADISON AVE. LOS ANGELES, CA. 90017 NEW YORK, N.U. 10022 FAR WEST SERVICES 2701 ALTON ST. IRVINE, CA. 92713 CAL WEST REAL ESTATE P 0 BOX 22630 LONG BEACH, CA. 90801 PDR ASSOCIATES JOE COELHO 1600 DOVE ST. #130 2862 MC GAW AVE. NEWPORT BEACH, CA.92660 IRVINE, CA. 92714 PARTICIA ROSS CARMA DEVELOPERS 2444 FAIR ACRES 1641 LANGLEY AVE. ST. LOUIS, MO.63136 IRVINE CA. 92714 MONTANITA DEL SOL ARTSAN DEVELOPMENT CORP STATE OF CALIFORNIA 14691 E. HAMPDEN PL. 1416 9th ST. AURORA, CA. 90014 SACRAMENTO, CA. 95814 RONALD BUTTON JAN MITCHELL 700 S. FLOWER 595 MADISON AVE. LOS ANGELES, CA. 90017 NEW YORK, N.U. 10022 FAR WEST SERVICES CAL WEST REAL ESTATE 2701 ALTON ST. P 0 BOX 22630 IRVINE, CA. 92713 LONG BEACH, CA. 90801 PDR ASSOCIATES JOE COELHO 1600 DOVE ST. #130 2862 MC GAW AVE. NEWPORT BEACH, CA.92660 IRVINE, CA. 92714 PARTICIA ROSS CARMA DEVELOPERS 2444 FAIR ACRES 1641 LANGLEY AVE. ST. LOUIS, MO.63136 IRVINE CA. 92714 MONTANITA DEL SOL ARTSAN DEVELOPMENT CORP. STATE OF CALIFORNIA 14691 E. HAMPDEN PL. 1416 9th ST. AURORA, CA. 90014 SACRAMENTO, CA. 95814 E S E F; T F�•1 r� r. �• ,�il )fit �11( kI`/ I'. •.al I .I 11.. .�aI111 UI. .....•11 f1. I( A I II�r�: f-t�r hl Wl ,.I ,. I....rl inl.•rI' ,o( .•r it �onrn.••1'...I .. t l•r. ;.I..:nni�lw RONALD BUTTON 700 S. FLOWER #1122 LOS ANGELES, CA.90017 JAN MITCHELL 595 MADISON AVE. NEW YORK, NY 10022 FAR WEST SERVICES 2701 ALTON ST. IRVINE, CA. 92713 CAL WEST REAL ESTATE P 0 BOX 22630 LONG BEACH, CA. 90801 PDR ASSOCIATES 1600 DOVE ST. #130 NEW PORT BEACH, CA. 92660 JOE COELHO 2862 MCGAW AVE. IRVINE, CA. 92714 PATRICIA ROSS 2444 FAIR ACRES ST. LOUIS MO. 63136 CARMA DEVELOPERS 1641 LANGLEY AVE. IRVINE, CA. 92714 MONTANITA DEL SOL STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1416 9th ST. SACRAMENTO, CA. 95814 ARTSAN DEVELOPMENT CORP. 14691 E. HAMPDEN PL. AURORA, CA. 90014 CITY Of PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review Of: CASE NO. COMMERCIAL BUILDING ADDITION t ype of Project) MR. POUL MOLLER t pp scant 72-235 PAINTERS PATH, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development -of thts-project--sholl conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed: Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to otherfinal inspection or Engineer. Constructionshaprovisions llconform atoaCity vStandards anded by the allrequirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed �s required bpy Municipal Code. Signature Date' Department of Environmental Services Form 18 C MY OF PALL DD ESERY FORK a®e 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 PRECISE PLAN APPLECA UCH CORN: Dept.of Planning and Community Development MR. POUL MOLLER Applicant ( please print) 72-235 PAINTERS PATH 346-0545 Mailing Address Telephone PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 City State Zip -Cods REQUEST' (Describe specific nature of approval requested). PRECISE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL TO ADD APPROXIMATELY 1,200 SQUARE FEET OF SHOWROOM SPACE TO EXISTING RETAIL CENTER AT 72-235 PAINTERS PATH. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 621301014-2 C-1 EXISTING ZONING Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states that they are the owner (s) of the property described herein and hereby give author- ,�zaticn for the filing of this opglication. Signature Date ement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. Applicants Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status. ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other - // -'R Date �� Date Accepted by: au—M-: Hou. FP V"ni—as Reference Coss No. L E6A-L -DE rc fz 1 V770 ----------------- SCHEDULE A 403T99 The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this schedule covered by this report is: a fee. U" ills to said a Zter interest at the date hereof is vested in: SSERT SKY DEVELOPMENT CO p �»a or 1! 1986 sal" DHI1TEG1 al."A. The laAd referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of Riverside and is teribed as follows: That portion of the Routh half of Government Lot 2 in the Southwest quarter of Section 18, Township 5 South, Range 6 Bast, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, described as followst Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Section 18; thence North 0° 12* West on the West line of said Seotionp T99.90 feet to the Southwest corner of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Allen Dale and Charlotte T. Dale, husband and wife, by Deed recorded August 29, 1957 as Instrument No. 62624; thence South 6T' 35' 30' Salt, 101.74 feet; thence South 44. 25' East 95.23 feet; thence South 590 50' 30` East 296.22 feet; thence North 55' 33' 30" East 47T.29 feet to the Westerly line of that parcel conveyed to the County of Riverside by Iced recorded December 10, 1915 in Book 433 page 69 of Deeds, Riverside County Records; thence Southerly along said Westerly line of that parcel conveyed to the Countt of Riverside to the South line of said Section 18; thence South 390 14' West on said South line of said Section 869.51 feet to the point of beginning. 0 P-116 C (G.S.) CLTA Preliminmy Report Form es Grant Deed ..................................... ...............................:......... ant to the County of Rivers POUL S. MOLLER and BIRGIT all that ................................................................ California, described as follows: what po tion of the south one-half of Government Lot 'in-- tbwe�f One -quarter of Section 18, T. 5 S., R. 6 E., S.B.M., described follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Section 18; Thence N. 89014'15" E. along the south line of said Section 18, 869.51 feet to the westerly line of that certain parcel conveyed to the County of Riverside by Deed recorded December 10, 1915 in Book 433, page 69 of Deeds, Records of Riverside County said point being the True Point of Beginning; Thence N. 17°16'41" W. along said westerly line, 154.15 feet; Thence S. 72043'19" W., 14.00 feet; Thence S. 17°16'41" E. parallel to said westerly line 150.00 feet to the south line of said Section 18; Thence N. 89°14'15" E. along the south line of said Section 18, 14.60 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Dated: ............................................................................ ....................... ..............-........................ Pou7 3:"hloTler STATE OF CALTFO ..,.�.�.. couriTr of xr� Birgit E: Moller ss. _ After recording rzIurn to Road. Commissioner, Courthouse, Riverside. California. PIER SW. //4&`C./B,TSS,R.6E. rD t2l.r 1 608 o«3�, o t. I Aft TRA ow - ozs 640 - O/B- O i ' i :l rr,rs ts17Ac2 , zorts i w y •� * /� � � W G 211.y1 1 • I29ICAf O � 1 r ' 1 • � Y h •� O a /!J I a 0 IIACM ! '0 ¢.bt: AW2 • © .. 40 * I s J16lM \� ! X t AV/ ljmAftxAMW •� 0 a rKi ® f#[6S/,IS-36Fb[y'Mp/.35�59 tlR9LIrS .M* If 0 V Mar � to f u STATEMENTS SUPPORTING THE REQUESTED PRECISE PLAN (15 Copies) Please state why the proposed precise plan should be approved based upon public , necessity, general welfare, or good zoning practice. THE APPLICANT WISHES TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL SINGLE STORY RETAIL SHOWROOM SPACE TO HIS NURSERY SALES PORTION OF HIS EXISTING BUILDING AT THE ENCLOSED ADDRESS. WHEN THE ORIGINAL STRUCTURE WAS BUILT IN 1972, THE FRONT SET BACKS WERE GREATER THAN THE PRESENT DAY REQUIREMENTS. ., CASE rlo. Environmental Assessment Form TO THE APPLICANT: Your cooperation in completing this form and supplying the information requested will expedite City review of your application pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is required to make an environmental assessment on all projects which it exercises discretionary approval over. Applications submitted will not be considered complete until all information necessary to make the environmental assessment is complete. GENERAL INFORMATION: I. Name, address, and telephone number of owner, applicant or project sponsor: MR. POUL MOLLER 72-235 PAINTERS PATH PALM DESERT CALIF. 92260 2. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted con- cerning the project (such as architect, engineer, or other repre- sentative): JOHN F. OUTCAULT, ARCHITECT, A.I.A. 74-133 EL PASEO #11 PALM DESERT, CALIF. 346-0630 3. Common name of project (if any): NONE 4. Project location (street address or general location): PAINTERS PATH, +600, SOUTH OF INTERSECTION OF HIWAY 111 5. Precise legal description of property (lot and tract number, or meets & bounds): ATTACHED 6. Proposed use of the site (project for which the form is filed; describe the total undertaking, not just the current application approval being sought): THIS ADDITION TO AN EXISMING ETAIT,- NURSERY CENTER IS TO BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL CUSTOMER SHOWROOM SPACE. 7. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects (describe how this project relates to other activities, 2hases, and develop- ments planned, or now underway): ADDITION TO AN EXISTING RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDING. 8. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, to go for:iard, including those required by the City, Regional, State and Federal agencies (indicate sub- sequent approval agency name, and type of approval required): CITY PUBLIC WORK DEPT. AND CITY BUILDING DEPT. EXISTING CONDITIONS: 9. Project site area:: PART OF OVERALL MASTER SITE, SHOWN ON PLOT PLAN. (Size of property in sq. ft. or acreage) 10. Present zoning: C-1 (Proposed zoning): 11. General Plan land use designation: COMMERCIAL 12. Existing use of the project site: COMMERCIAL 13. Existing use on adjacent properties: (Example - North, Shopping Center; South, Single Family Dwellings; East, Vacant, etc.). `NORTH - VACANT, SOUTH - COMMERCIAL EAST - SHOPPING CENTER 14. Site topography (describe): FLAT 15. Are there any natural or manmade drainage channels through or adjacent to the property? NO_ x YES 16. Grading (estimate number of cubic yards of dirt being moved): NONE AT THTR TTMV 17. List the number, size and type of trees being removed: NONE ONE OLIVE TREE AND TWO PLANTS TO BE RELOCATED. 18. Describe any cultural, historic, or scenic aspects of the project site: NONE. MOUNTAINOUS AREA_ T"JTnrr(.r,, 1 I 19. Residential Project (if not residential do NOT answer) A. Number and type of dwelling units (Specify no. of bedrooms): ��)f4p4�H�BPI;�X�fbiXH[9[�A;SB�BX . B. Schedule of unit sizes: C. Number of stories Height feet. D. Largest single building (sq. ft.) (hgt.) E. Type of household size expedted (population project): projection for the F. Describe the number and type of recreational facilities: F; G. Is there any nigh lighting of the project: H. Range of sa1.os•prices or rents: $ I. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r.: Paving, including streets. . Landscaping, Open, Recreation Area . .f r to 20. Commercial, Industrial, Institutional or Other Project: A. Type of use(s) and major function(s) (if offices, specify type & number):' RETAIL SHOWROOM B. Number of square feet in total building area: 1,200 C. Number of stories ONE Height == + 14'6" feet. D. Largest single building (Sq. Ft.) (Hgt.) E. Number of square feet in outdoor storage area: F. Total number of required parking spaces 5 number provided 5 ' G: Hours of operation: 8 A.M. TO 6 P.M. 6 DAYS A WEEK. H. Maximum number of clients, patrons, shoppers, etc., at one time: UNKNOWN BUT PROBABLY 115" I. Maximum number of employees at one time: PROBABLY S J. If patron seating is involved, state the number: NONE K. Is there any night lighting of the project: Yes — No X SAFETY LIGHTING FOR PARKING LOT. L. Percent of total project devoted to: Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . + q Paving, including streets. . . . . . . . . + Landscaping and Open Space (Recreation). + + VirFIGULT TO CAt, CUL.Aif-0 s I21. pi-o-r p1,� I Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects: Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 21. Change in existing features of hillsides, or substantial alteration of ground contours. X 22. Change in the dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in the project vicinity. X 23. Subject to or resulting in soil errosion by wind or flooding. X 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X 25 Change in existing noise or vibration level in the vicinity. Subject to roadway or airport noise (has the required acoustical report been submitted?) X 26. Involves the use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. X 27. Involves the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. X 28. Changes the demand for municipal services (police, fire, sewage, etc.) X 29. Changes the demand for utility services, beyond those presently available or planned in the near future. X 30. Significantly affects any unique or natural features, including mature trees. X 31. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public land or public roads. B- 32. Results in the dislocation of people. g YES NO 33. Generates controversy based on aesthetics or other features of the project. x [ ] Additional explanation of "yes" answers attached. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation, to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct to the best of my,knowledge and belief. JOHN F. OUTCAULT ARCHITECT, AI.A. POUL MOLLER (OWNER) Name Print or Type For S i gh-tTre Date INITIAL STUDY FEE: $30.00 (Make check payable to the City of Palm Desert and sub— mit with this form.) FF SAtiR 5 ARM& 310 Ii 9 AO V 4r00 - .25 KIft Z RAC ' - .l .• •. —rr-r A 3TC^1ct `Ac RT 1AL '11141so CITY OF PALM DESERT 'DEP OFING 6 $AF/FTY II (NEOi?lfJ/ ICJ F LOT P A N ^'�N �/"W�IU ��µ� INIS MGM. •. Y[ CpI�1a1�CP TO N a "WMT Poo ••� .. tv, YII W ." a Yir di i.K OWY �. isn +or ��•n A CCat. 04aMNCp w t..q n.,1 .. `� ApMU.lO �l.fn JJ�/ Yi yn M TNT A. MO •A� Gir-1 AW-VSA BOAC OP MO ,JN ? 1 w eels+ .o.w HtW bwour sorA` I� GTwln J At DT I-64. YsWr 4$6 IR■ f K r' P F CI! s a 4 W 'Lf tk .Z "LL " n W- - --. s T "., I I- L, Z. � P 4C OC - t. 50 7aa35 Pam, rl ^ !c t A E STkwC 7uPE u a dv 1 m 's i G�� :%C'f/vTcR OTC ti +dG L R741 � • M �w��M 1�' I.i � � t'+� �- 2'� � MaN ova akM40441b. AYT00 ANOWANO L.! Off!! S•! � a^eiMa :l. iTVOf a A Naw *&am. t►.cas - 4864. PAIZKANG ANA1.`/;ils VLX.ft'r s L.00.. 2.,1 co i 74ILW I7ii_0, TOT►. 2. rti►W vAnjL i WG Rlo D. 10.7 sMCA Ptav, Doo 10 6YK.Ai 3 IEa1/T, W^UL N6 a►Atas, Ra-ZTq,Pa "a MJi.a 4 ITmea! PLOT P AN SerL= bo'.%' r. M aW �fl l O�Mf� i W :- - 6u1!CO1H.4.: . T , 2 --Yi-1 - ---I 16uI L-D lNc: COMMER.CIAT. MOUNTAIN. AREA EYIbT PA RIG' � now =1?15AL=fi•1'�I:ER _.:._ _-(2�11�8(e '- BUILDINGS (EXISTIIJG ) -- I �2-235 — — (25TORY). 72e2o5--- 2600_ 1 -T2- IS5 - 4800 .SUB-. TOTAL=. 1 1,,900 50 FT. (P2oPo SED.� PA1NT>`2s -..NEw BuiuDING —2816 . - F-A.T H TOTAL GOMMEROAL_ - .SQUARE FUO-TAGE- 14,i 16 S61 FT I PA2'OC JG SPRGES - - _ McQu tmeo _-14j11G.=250 z 58 SPACES - - — - PRovloep- 7p=5PacES-. Z'2:2o5 I PINNr�12 - (r T k F. OUTCAULT o ARCHITECT A.I.A- 74 - 133 EL PASEO #11 _ 346-0630 PA DESERT.'CALIFORNIA PLO-7 'P LAN scA�E : loop _ , .• N 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO: 133 C APPLICANT: Poul Moller & John Outcault, Architect NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for second story addition to commercial building. LOCATION: 72-055 Painters Path ZONE: C-1, S.P. and S:I. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and fy the applicant, the Design Review Board approved this project, subject to revisions. Date of'Action: July 29, 1980 Vote: 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COPIMENTS: See attached minutes MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD TUESDAY - JULY 29, 1980 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. The meeting was called to order at 2:30 p.m. after a two and one-half hour study session. MEMBERS PRESENT: Al Cook Rick Holden Eric Johnson Charles Martin Chairperson Phyllis Jackson MEMBERS ABSENT: Vern Barton Bernie Leung STAFF PRESENT: Stan Sawa On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Cook, the Board approved the Minutes of the meeting of July 15, 1980, with modifications to Case No. 214 MF. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Martin, Jackson). II. On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Holden, the following case was approved by minute motion: Case No. 133 C - POUL MOLLER - final approval of plans for second story addition to commercial building at 72-055 Painters Path. III. CASES Case No. 91 C - HUGHES INVESTMENTS (c/o SGPA) - amendment to sign program to allow internally lit sign for StrawHat Pizza on the south side of Highway 111, east of Highway 74; Ron Brown and Chuck Stechman were present. The Board reviewed the submitted sign request of the applicant. The applicant discussed his reasons for needing a lighted sign. The possibility of better lighting for a permanent wood sign in compliance with the sign program was discussed and deemed desirable. It was noted that the proposed sign would not be compatible with the rest of the shopping center or Carl's Jr. It was noted that Carl's Jr. originally requested internally lit signs and was denied. On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to deny this request. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Martin, Jackson). Case No. 479 SA - ELVIN AISMAN (c/o MARY HENNESSEY) - approval of free-stand- ing motel sign for property located at 73-929 Larrea,Street; Mary Hennessey was present. The Board reviewed the submitted sign and indicated a number of changes necessary. The Board felt that the sign should be a wood sandblasted sign which would be more compatible with the residential character of the area. Additionally, they felt the sign supports should be lowered two feet. On a motion by Martin, seconded by Johnson, the Board moved to approve this request, subject to the following revisions: 1. Sign to be wood sandblasted sign. 2. Supports for sign to be lowered two of sign two feet. feet in order to reduce overall height Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Martin, Jackson). Case No. 214 MF (continued item) - KAUFMAN & BROAD - preliminary approval of plans for 22 unit condominium project at the southeast corner of Hovley Lane and Portola Avenue; Toni Quezada, Dave Wagner, Clark Butts and Bob Bucci were present. The Board reviewed the revised plans submitted by the applicant. There was an extensive discussion regarding energy concerns with the Board stating that they were concerned with the whole envelope and not dust the walls. Also MINUTES : DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JULY 29, 1980 Page Two III. CASES (Continued) Case No. 214 MF - KAUFMAN & BROAD (Continued) discussed was the use of the same units in all three projects proposed by the applicant. The architect noted that the eave overhangs indicated on the roof plans are maximum overhangs. The architect stated that an orientation study would dictate the amount of overhangs provided. On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to grant preliminary approval of the submitted plans, subject to the following revisions: 1. Solar heating shall be provided for the swimming pool. 2. Dense landscaping to be provided to screen the tennis court lighting from Portola Avenue. 3. Applicant to submit, with final working drawings, a study of solar concerns for the whole building envelope (walls, ceiling, air conditioning, double glazing, weather stripping). 4. All conditions of Development Plan 11-79 and Tentative Tract 14998 shall be complied with. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Martin, Jackson). Case No. 120 C - ERNEST W. HAHN, INC. - approval of revised preliminary site plan for shopping center at northeast corner of E1 Paseo extended and Highway 111; Ernest Hahn, Millard Archuleta, Don Fircher,Larry Moline, and Hany Tadros were present. The Board reviewed the revised plans submitted by the applicant. The appli- cant briefly discussed the changes and rationale behind the changes. The applicant indicated that there would be a net 35 feet of landscaping (18 feet on their property and 17 feet on Cal Trans right-of-way) along Highway 111 for landscaping and screening. It was indicated that there would be a maximum of four feet of berming of this area. Subsequent discussion indicated that because of the relative grade between the parking lot and Highway Ill additional berming or other screening may be necessary. The applicant stated landscaping materials will be significantly upgraded if the reduction in planter width is approved. The applicants submitted a modification to the parking area on the west side of May Company. The relocation of the Montgomery Ward T.B.A. was discussed with the Board feeling that the relocation was acceptable. The east -west road which runs adjacent to Rancho Grande between E1 Paseo and Monterey Avenue, was reviewed with the Board indicating a need to modify this road. The Board felt that some sort of jog should be provided to slow traffic and discourage through traffic. The applicant's Traffic Consultant explained the function of this road and how site circulation would work. The applicant agreed to provide a jog in this road with a design to be worked out. It was noted during the study session that the City Traffic Consultant would review the revisions to the circulation system of the center. The Board inquired about Sandy's Restaurant, which is located near the corner of Highway Ill and Monterey Avenue. It was noted that the gas station would cease to function because of the street widening. However, Sandy's Restaurant will continue to operate. It was noted that the applicants were providing a driveway access to Sandy's Restaurant. The Board indicated a desire to review how Sandy's Restaurant will integrate with the overall plan. The inclusion of a driveway element through the landscape area adjacent to Plaza Way, was reviewed with the applicant presenting justification for such a road. The Board felt that some use of Bomanite or other paving material should be utilized in this drive area if it is to be permitted. The Landscape Architect presented a revised preliminary landscape plan based on the proposed changes. Discussion centered around the landscaping adjacent to Highway ill and use of landscaping materials. The Board indicated that they would like to see an alternate tree to the Eucalyptus within the parking MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JULY 29, 1980 Page Three III. CASES (Continued) Case No. 120 C - ERNEST W. HAHN, INC. (Continued) lot and an expanded plant palate. The Landscape Architect felt that addi- tional review of lansdcaping materials was desirable. The applicant indicated that the proposed trellises previously indicated in the parking lot have been removed. They indicated trees would be used for shading purposes. It was noted that landscaping around the mall itself would be reviewed as a part of the individual building approvals. The applicants indicated that while the front plaza has been reduced in size all of the same amenities as originally indicated would be provided. On a motion by Johnson, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to grant prelimi- nary approval of the revised site plan subject to the following: 1. Provide jog in east -west road from E1 Paseo to Monterey. 2. Utilize Bomanite or other paving material in new two-way drive at northerly end of Plaza Way, if drive is approved. 3. Landscaping to be significantly upgraded along Highway 111, if reduction in width is approved. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Martin, Jackson). The applicant indicated that they would keep the Board up to date on the development plans by submittal of interim final plans. Case No. 134 C - DAN WAYNE LEE (TAI PING RESTAURANT) - preliminary and finales of plans to remodel exterior of restaurant at 45-299 Lupine Lane; Dan Wayne Lee was present. The Board reviewed the submitted plans and felt that the proposed remodeling was acceptable. On a motion by Cook, seconded by Johnson, the Board moved to grant preliminary and final approval as submitted. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Martin, Jackson). Case No. 216 MF - SOUTHWESTERN ENTERPRISES, INC. - approval of perimeter wall for single family subdivision on the east side of Highway 74, south of Homestead Road; Ron Gregory was present. The Board reviewed the submitted perimeter wall plan for Tract 13008. The. Board felt that they would like to see the landscaping plan at the same time that they review the perimeter wall plan. The Board indicated that it may be desirable to provide relief to the wall depending on how the landscape concept is developed. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Cook, the Board moved to continue this item indefinitely, with the concurrence of the applicant. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Johnson, Martin, Jackson). IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS Exterior remodeling of U-Name-It at 73-714 Highway 111. The Board reviewed this request which was forwarded to their body at the discretion of Staff. The applicant presented a sample of the material to the Board. The Board felt that a remodeling of only one shop would not be archi- tecturally acceptable. Therefore, they suggested to the applicant that he remodel the fronts of the buildings, utilizing the existing materials. MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD JULY 29, 1980 Page Four IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS (Continued) Case No. 215 MF - HOLMBERG & TONER - interim review of site plan. The Board reviewed an interim final site plan submitted by the applicant. The Board presented ideas to the applicant, mainly with regard to the streetscape. The Board noted a number of concerns which they wanted Staff to investigate. Staff indicated that the items of concern would be investigated with reports back to the Board as necessary. V. ADJOURNMENT - 4:50 p.m. S AN SAWA, Associate P anner /dj MINUTES DESIGR REVIEW BOARD MAY 27, 1980 0 Page Three Case No.,133 - POUL MOLLER AND JOHN OUTCAULT - Preliminary approval of plans to add second story to a commercial building located at 72-055 Painters Path; Poul Moller and John Outcault were present. The Board reviewed the submitted plans for the second story addition. The applicant submitted a revised plot plan as suggested in staff comment number one. The Board discussed stucco pop -outs around the windows with the applicants agreeing to provide them. On a motion by Holden, seconded by Barton, the Board granted preliminary approval of the submitted plans, subject to the following revisions: 1. Windows in addition to be framed out 10" from wall. 2. New parking area to be paved and double striped per City requirements. 3. Final plans to reflect revisions required by this approval. Carried 5-0 (Barton, Cook, Holden, Jackson, Martin) IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS Case No. CUP 07-80, DP 07-80, and C/Z 01-80 - C. ROBERT HUBBARD - Construction of co ercial center to include a Supermarket, Retail Spaces, Savings and Loan, and a tel/condominium complex at the northeast corner of Hwy 111 and Deep Canyon ad. Applicants and Representatives were present. The Board viewed the plans on a conceptual basis and felt that based on the Exhibits reviewed the project was architecturally acceptable. Case No. ZOA 0 80 - Amendment to Sign Ordinance for courtyard directory signs. The Board reviewed he proposed ordinance and felt that the following would be acceptable: 1. Top sign to be 2 �9. ft. 2. Tenant signs to be 1\ sq. ft. 3. Maximum height to be 6 Case No. DP 06-80 - GERALD CHA N - Contruction of commercial center at the intersection of E1 Paseo and Hw 111. The Board felt that the project wa conceptually acceptable. They commented on the possibility of flipping bank locations, squaring the commercial complex, and providing underground pa ing. Screening of the project from E1 Paseo was determined to be important. V. ADJOURNMENT - 4:25 P.M. 1 .--NDA ITEM NO. III, A-2 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 133 C DATE July 29, 1980 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) Poul Moller (72-055 Painters Path, Palm Desert, CA 92260)_ and John Outcault, Architect (74-133 E1 Paseo. Ste. 11. Palm Desert, NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Final approval of plans for second story addition to commercial building. LOCATION 72-055 Painters Path ZONE C-1, S.P. and S.I. This request is for final approval of plans to add a 980 square foot second story addition to an existing 3,520 square foot single story building. The Board granted preliminary approval on May 27, 1980, subject to three revisions (see attached Minutes of the May 27, 1980, meeting). STAFF ANALYSIS: The final plans appear to be in compliance with the preliminary approval with one possible exception. One of the conditions was that "windows in addition to be framed out ten inches from wall". The applicant interpreted this to mean that the stucco popout be ten inches vertically. Horizontally, the popout is six inches from the wall. The Board should determine whether this interpretation is correct. If not, the applicant should be instructed to revise the final plans. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 3, 1980 Page 9 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- V l\ PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) Motion was made by Commissioner Kryder, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to app ove this case by adoption of Resolution No. 606, as amended. Carried unanimo ly (5-0). L. Cose No. ZOA 04-80, CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Conss.deration of an amendment to Chapter 25.30 of the Municipal Code (Zoning Ordinance) of the City of Palm Desert, California, relati6q to permitted uses in the PC (4) zone district. Mr. Williams'stated that this request has been discussed on two previous occasions. He felt that if the wording of the ordinance was more consistant with the wording of the Redevelopment Plan it would resolve the problems. He explained the difference between the related uses to Hotel versus the related uses for Restaurants. He reviewed the recommended uses shown as Exhibit "A". Commissioner Berkey questioned Item D, he suggested a revision to read: "The Commission may permit other uses which it may determine to be similar to thoselisted above". Commissioner Kryder felt that in Item B, "Professional Offices" should be expanded to "General Offices". The Commission concurred, therefore, making the uses Accounting services, General Medical Care and Services, and Secretarial Services to be listed under the General Offices. Chairman Miller opened the Public Hearing asking if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. MR. BOB GILROY, PDR Associates, stated that he reviewed the proposed list of uses and still had some questions relative to his list of proposed uses for the Las Sombras project. Commissioner Richards asked Mr. Williams to clarify these uses for Mr. Gilroy. Mr. Williams clarified the matter to Mr. Gilroy's satisfaction. Commissioner Richards stated that there might be a problem with the financial institutions in terms of banks, being that it was not listed on the Exhibit. Commissioner Berkey explained that Item D would determine that use. Mr. Gilroy then gave a brief presentation on proposed uses for the Las Sombras project. MR. FRED ARBUCKLE, stated he needed a better clarification in terms of ancillary uses. He asked if a restaurant and hotel could be on the same project. Mr. Williams replied that it depended on the size of the project. He added that a principle use would have to be declared and if it were an 8 acre project it could declare two uses, noting the minimum development site in the PC(4) Zone is four acres. After a brief discussion the Public Hearing was closed and motion was made by Commissioner Berkey, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, to approve the amendment by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 607, as amended. Carried unanimously (5-0). VII.. OLD BUSINESS - NONE VIII. NEW BUSINESS - NONE IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Consideration of cases acted on by the Design Review Board at their meeting of May 27, 1980. Motion was made by Commissioner R' s, seconded by Commissioner Kryder, to approve Design Review Board case No. 133 C, by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 608. Carried unanimously -0). t 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE June 6, 1980 APPLICANT POUL MOLLER 72-055 Painters Path Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO: 133 C The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at is meeting of June 3, 1980 CONTINUED TO DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 608 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. cc: Applicant C.V.C.W.D. File PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 608 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING, THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION AT THEIR MEETING OF MAY 27, 1980. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of May 27, 1980, approving: Case No. 133 C - Preliminary plans for second story addition to commercial building at 72-055 Painters Path for POLL MILLER. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board action of May 27, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of May 27, 1980. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 3rd day of June, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KRYDER, MCLACHLAN, RICHARDS, MILLER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE CHARLES MILLER Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /lr 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO: 133C APPLICANT: John Outcault NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval of plans to add second story to commercial building. LOCATION: 72-055 Painters Path ZONE: C-1, S.P. and S.I. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and fy the applicant, the Design Review Board approves this project, subject to revisions. Date of Action: May 27, 1980 Vote: 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: See attached minutes. Vf dDA ITEM NO. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 133 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) and JOHN OUTCAULT, Arch DATE May 27, 1980 POUL MOLLER (72-055 Painters Path, P.D. 92260) 74-133 E1 Paseo, Ste. 11, P.D. 92260) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary and final approval of plans to add second story to commercial 0 ing. LOCATION 72-055 Painters Path ZONE C-1, S.P. and S.I. The applicant wishes to add a 980 sq. ft. second story addition to his existing 3,520 sq. ft. single story building. Additional parking would be added behind the existing building to provide the code required parking. The second story addition will architecturally match the existing structure. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the submitted plans and would offer the following comments: 1. The new parking area should be revised so that the existing driveway around the building can be utilized for the back-up area for the new stalls. 2. The new parking area should be paved and doubled striped per City requirements. 3. Revised final plans should be submitted to the Planning Dept. for approval prior to submission to Dept. of Building and Safety. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 133 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) and JOHN OUTCAULT, Arch AGENDA ITEM N0. III, B-3 DATE May 27, 1980 POOL MOLLER (72-055 Painters Path, P.D. 92260) 74-133 E1 Paseo, Ste. 11, P.D. 92260) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary and final approval of plans to add second story to commercial bUllaing. LOCATION 72-055 Painters Path ZONE C-1, S.P. and S.I. The applicant wishes to add a 980 sq. ft. second story addition to his existing 3,520 sq. ft. single story building. Additional parking would be added behind the existing building to provide the code required parking. The second story addition will architecturally match the existing structure. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the submitted plans and would offer the following comments: 1. The new parking area should be revised so that the existing driveway around the building can be utilized for the back-up area for the new stalls. 2. The new parking area should be paved and doubled striped per City requirements. 3. Revised final plans should be submitted to the Planning Dept. for approval prior to submission to Dept. of Building and Safety. N V -1 cl -L O -1 d HO 1.lI cmO-q J.2`IOJ..s: QNt -3anQ.w i r = ,Oc7 ' ml-ty N `10 IN, .11>01a .`.{�, MAN / / / / / 1tlM 1N1N171�� 'Ni-Aa tJd MO'{ '1S1X3 I N V-1NOOV`i .10 = Q- ._ v S9'Sv N1 V_L tJ nOW 4oSV b u PH t�qulr�nnel_Lr N LAW TILls IZOOF TQ.M ATG F-1 -L $l6TIK(:. � xriaa �►w��aw� � -uY/w 4uttw/fit wwA-r�o� ■_ EST ELMv4-rION I;Q L)I PMist-T WIaLL � h V ' � ,--1�Itl6TlN f� celnCwr 1 PLA OT�2. N 0 QT H E L. E VA 'T-I O N a AImW Tl 1_C RC+pr= TO MRrTcH t=xL,-�I-t"G I5,XI-wnKG CgsM tLA1T PL A S T rt tG _mxk5 PLC ,� ;.�_ I,,.,i,,.r `_� :i.... ,..b. < a.� Y � X.- 9P0MR9 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION POUL MOLLER Applicant I puo-- m,m) 72-055 Painters Path 346-0545 Mailing Address Telephone Parhst Desert, California City State Z REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) Approval of second story addition to existing building PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING Commercial Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER (S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- �{ZAT10 E FILING OF THIS 4PP ATION. o URE DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRICTIO AT MAY B/EAPPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. SIGNATURE JJJ DATE Applicants Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER DATE ACCEPTED BY T CASE No. 133 C- REFERENCE CASE N0. 0.21 ID.3.) ?Me 20 Sebeftle A. %03Ti9 That portion of the South half of Government Lot 2 in the Southwest quarter of Scotian l0, Township 5 Sorths Range 6 ]cast. San Bernardino lase and Meridian, described as followss beginning at the Southwest corner of said Section lt; thsaoe Rerth 0e 129 hest on the (lest line of said Sections T",90 feet to the Southwest earner of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Allen Dale and Charlotte F. Dale, husband and wires by Deed recorded August 29s 195T as Lwtrunent No. 62624; thenee South 6Te 352 30e Fasts 101.74 feet= thence South 4P 250 East 95.23 feet; thence South 59e 50. 30e East 296.22 feet; thence !forth 550 339 30e East 4TT.29 feet to the Westerly line of that parcel conveyed to the County of Riversido by Deed recorded Deees+lsr 100 1915 in Book 433 page 69 of Deeds, Riverside County Records; thence Southerly along said Westerly line of that parcel conveyed to the County of Riverside to the south Ilae of said Section 18; thence South 89e lt• West on said South line of said Section 869.51 feet to the point of beginning. I _ t T ko 0 �a v y `� 4 rn �� r�' ). . nW` � ' V � g N � �a d PAP i ROPChO Afovgd Gly Limns "O'0 6 rt6 -C x .N n w � •e�.n w � h � a OIL w w0 Rancho n'lroge R 5E- City Lm is COD q 3 oti r�rT zd LJ- -J-- tit9 � iH ''44 � n s — �1 ti f Ivr vt 44 w -4 C r A 1 4 ko 3+ N -1 0 0 O cl s ON a 44 m � � � a ©o O O w ri1 z� i1 II c: Z (� m cn O DRAWING TITLE m D 11 1 PROJECT AL7oi 1 10N TC CkI:ST 1NCy f!DU-1 LCD} ,4C m JOHN F. OUTCAULT — ARCHITECT A. I. A. A CORPORATION 74-133 EL PASEO, SUITE 11 Tele. 619-346-0630 PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 CALIF. STATE LIC. NO. C2452 ___---___—_—__—____ AWN CHECKED SQUAREFOOTAG hnZ,..i>n m u (il REVISIONS RAL ELECTRICAL y �.1 7<- Z 3 P�11 l c.5 F'A-TH P 411 -1,,n 1�— U-" 5 1-. tom'. ` i - �' 4 , Iw 6 _ F - E MECHANICAL