The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About138C ROBERT MCLACHLANMINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY - OCTOBER 14, 1981 1:00 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Kryder called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Commissioner Miller III. ROLL CALL Members Present: Commissioner Crites Commissioner Richards Commissioner Wood Commissioner Miller Chairman Kryder Staff Present: Ray Diaz, Director of Environmental Services Stan Sawa, Principal Planner Steve Smith, Associate Planner Linda Russell, Planning Secretary Others Present: Barry McClellan, Director of Public Works Eric Vogt, Fire Marshal IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 29, 1981 Moved by Commisioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to approve the minutes as submitted. Carried 5-0. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Diaz reviewed the actions of the Council from the meeting of October 8, 1981. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Planning Commission or audience request specific items be removed from the consent-Galendar for separate discussion and action. A. DP 10-80 a 8 138 C - ROBERT McLACHLAN - Request for approval of a one year ext ussion-of-tune for a Development Plan and Design Review Case for a 49 unit motel and athletic club located 900 feet east of Highway 111, between Park View Drive and Cactus Drive. B. DP 03-80 - WARMINGTON-KARMA - Request for approval of a one year extension of time for a Development Plan for 438 unit (876 rentable rooms) hotel and associated commercial uses in the PC (4) S.P. zone on the west side of Highway 111, south of 44th Avenue. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the one year time extensions. Carried 5-0. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No. DP 08-81 - JDF FINANCIAL CORPORATION and WILLIAM E. SEXTON, Applicants Request for approval of a commercial development plan to allow construction of a 172 unit condotel on 7.27 acres in the PC (4) S.P. zone located on the south side of Highway Ill, approximately 300 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. Mr. Diaz briefly summarized this case and stated that because this project would -1- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 647 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 49 UNIT MOTEL AND ATHLETIC CLUB LOCATED 900 FEET EAST OF HIGHWAY 111, BETWEEN PARK VIEW DRIVE AND CACTUS DRIVE. CASE NO. DP 10-80 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 30th day of September, 1980, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing and continued Public Hearing on October 15, 1980, to consider a request by ROBERT R. MCLACHLAN for approval of a Development Plan to allow construction of a 49 unit motel and associated 30,000 sq.ft. athletic club on 3.92 acres within the PC (4), S.P. (Resort Commercial, Scenic Preservation Overlay) zone generally located 900 feet east of Hwy 111, between Park View Drive and Cactus Drive, more particularly described as: APN 621-312-015 through 019 APN 621-312-024 through 029 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolu- tion No. 80-89", in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: a. The proposed project generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PC (4) Zone District. b. The proposed project is adequately suited for the specific site and is compatible with existing and proposed development in the area. C. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conceptual Development Plan No. 10-80, subject to those conditions attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 15th day of October, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, RICHARDS, MILLER NOES: NONE ABSENT: KRYDER ABSTAIN: MCLACHLAN CHARLES MILLER, Chairman ATTEST: STAN SAWA, Acting Secretary /lr OP r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 647 Page Two STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 10-80 1. The development of the property shall conform with Exhibit A (Case No. DP 10-80) on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions and as superceded by subsequent revisions to the site plan. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses con- templated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which includes, but not limited to, Design Review, Subdivision process and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of the total development shall be done in one phase. 4. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval; otherwise, said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 5. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restric- tions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and State and Federal Statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 6. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 7. All requirements of the City Fire Marshal shall be met as part of the development of this project per attached letter dated September 11, 1980. 8. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 9. Traffic control provisions and safety street lighting shall be provided as required by the Director of Public Works. 10. Curb, gutter, sidewalk or approved pathways, and tie-in paving and drainage shall be provided in conformance with City Standards and/or as required by the Director of Public Works. 11. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. No building permits to be issued until vacation of Cholla Drive is approved and finalized. 2. Prior to issuance of a building/grading permit, a final map shall be recorded consolidating the existing lots into two lots as proposed by this project. 3. Restaurant in athletic club to be "private" (not open to general public) and limited to juice bar/sandwich type of operation. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 647 Page Three 4. Impact of athletic club on existing residences to east to be studied by Design Review Board to insure compatibility with adjacent residences. 5. Parking lot lights not to exceed ten feet in height per Municipal Code require- ments and be down shining and shielded to eliminate glare to adjacent properties and public right-of-ways. 6. Right-of-way dedication and street improvement to provide 44 foot half street on Park View Drive per Department of Public Works requirements. i 7. 25 foot half street improvements shall be provided on Cactus Drive per Department of Public Works requirements. 8. Access to Cactus Drive be for "emergency" vehicles only and provided with approved barrier. 9. Hereby authorized as a part of this Development Plan approval are the exceptions as listed in the following: a. Minimum building setback of 20 feet for south property line of resort motel is approved with minimum 10 feet (average over 20 feet). b. Minimum development site of 3.92 acres gross. 10. Motel use to be limited to temporary or overnight accomodations for guests only and not for permanent occupancy, with the exception of manager's unit. 11. Applicant to dedicate land to provide additional facilities for orderly expansion of East Magnesia Canyon Stormwater Channel as required by the Coachella Valley Water District. 12. Easements to be recorded prior to issuance of any building or grading permits to provide for common parking, circulation, and access between the two proposed parcels. I 13. Increase setback between Athletic Club and east property line from 45 feetto 46 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 647 Page Four DEPARTMENT OF FIRE PROTECTION IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY DAVID L. FLAKE COUNTY FIRE WARDEN September 11, 1980 Murrel Crump Principal Planner City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Reference: Case No. DP 10-80 Gentlemen: P.O. BOX 248 210 WEST SAN JACINTO STREET PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92370 TELEPHONE (714) 657-3183 Prior to construction of any of the proposed buildings, the following conditions must be met: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a four (4) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 10-80 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." PLANNING COMMISSION RESuLuiION NO 647 Page Five DP 10-80, cont. 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. All buildings to be protected with automatic sprinklers. Very truly yours, David L. Flake Fire Chief/ Eric L. Vogt Fire Marshal ELV:dt CC: Jim Zimmerman Coachella Valley Water District G$ilj�r o:ff IF81 n 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date: 10-19-81 APPLICANT: Robert McLachlan 74-075 El Paseo Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: CASE NOS. DP 10-80 and 138 C The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of October 14, 1981. APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTE ACTION. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. Q.. . DIA1 Secretary cc: Files DP 10-80 & 138 C N INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RAMON A. DIAZ, DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SUBJECT: 138 C - MCLACHLAN DATE: January 9, 1981 Attached is a revised Drainage Plan for for tht souutthh sii)dde of P k View Drive, RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES /pa 138C, the Athletic Club/Motel proposed east of Highway 111. January 8, 1981 Ray Diaz, Director of Community Development Palm Desert City Hall 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California Attn: Stan Sawa Dear Stan: The area in Blue (Bl & B2), is equal to the area of the project site. The Storm Water from this area will be designed to flow to Park View. The quanity of over land drainage (G1 & G2), is less than the amount now flowing to Cactus Drive. There will be no Storm Water flow into Cholla Drive from this project. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, RONALD W. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES 41m. H. Fitch tch Office Manager Wf/ma cc: Barry McCallum, City Engineer JAN - g 1981 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT JN900-0101 ENGINEERING • COMMUNITY PLANNING • SURVEYING 74075 EL PASEO, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92660 (714) 568-5606 w 40 o 0i &ARA 2 i r w � r 99.0 Y2. lo� 1HOL L4 ` R /99.5 CACTUS DR s' S r Ipl.S BRUSHWOOD � � t w+ r I r9B.3 7 r.0 lg:j a li14, I �I I1 i' � i r. 10 1 1 FO.2 SUR �i I PER Ei ' I'� I III III I -, -' '�J,:. .• - '. - - - f ,..• , PALM DESERT ATHLETIC CLUB STORM,DRATNAGE CALCULATIONS; Current Drainage: ;25,•year-Storm : Q 3.15" Runoff Coefficient - C '-'0:63 or:63% .(Undeveloped Land),,,, , Drainage ,Areas Onsite: ',(B2'& G2)' Parkview''='0 35`'Ac S , 3:A5 0 63',:0:.691c,f.s. Chol1a -•.T 65"Ac. 3'.15, '; 0,63•= 3.'27 c.f.s. ;Cactus .--.1,92<Ac: ; 3:15 ?''0.63 =;3:81 'e:•fs. Total. ProOect'Site Drainage^ ,:., 7 7T<.c,•f.s.. . Drainage,Area Offsite (Bl�& Gl-)a 2:83 Ac 3.15 0'63. `5,.62'c:f.s. •Total 'Area -Drainage = 13.•39 c.f.s.. Proposed :Drainage':,' - 25-'year Storm I' = 3.15" i` 1 Runoff Coefficient - C '0.63 or 63%_.,(Undeveloped Land) C 0:87, or 87%, (Proposed Development) Drainage.to Parkvi'ew: Onsite, (B2) - 3,:01 Ac 3;15'0:87-'= 8.25 c•f.s.. Offsite".(B1) .= 0.91 Ac 3,15 `- 0:63 = T.81 c.f.s. Total 3:92.Ac_. 10.06'c.f.a: Drainage.to Cactus:," 'On site (G2,):= 0.91 Ac. 3'.`T5 "-0.87 = 2.4,9.c.f.s. ' Offsite (Gl)'- 1,92 Ac 3.15 0.63 = 3.81 c.f.'s.. Total 2.,83 Nc. 6,30 c fa,. Cactus,: Current %T.62 c.f.'s. Pro pose c.f.'s. Total "Reduction = T.'32 c',f.s. /J Wm H. ;Fitch, -Office Manager .ENG-I.WEERhN'G' C6M;M,UN17,Y PLkNNIN'G SVR'VEY1NG• .. 74075''EL PASEO, PALM DESERT,' CALIFORNIA 92660. (744)' ,568-5606 , 1 1 it I I I I I I I r- ii ♦ � {" I : I 1- � t I 1 f-t"�„-' 111�1 i I tt I I 1 I I 1 I. 1 I l .I ` � I 1 j P 1 i III � li II I� II i I i IL I-6 E N' Q I 1 1 c VRV� tyP 1 N O. nvelopgd o 1g I I rk I. _ ,_� _._T,T 1 ` 1 I 1 5♦0010 >qi jn, r I Aort � I —1191(1d146 for I) rs%"npa I 1 I R—.i 'Mo 3 41 1 horne pork I . �1 \J 1 I ��1 rF' t. j I I I I I I 1 0 L GROW 11 IA;. I I I i I ! 1 11 rr I f� t lI itI' it I 2 3 RAINFALL INTENSITY (INCHES PCR HOUR)♦I♦♦ Dla'w/I1� 8y COUNTY OF KERN Plate Number STATE OF CALIFORNIA D-I5 checkee By COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF °Crl Dote 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE February 9, 1981 APPLICANTS) Robert R. McLachlan 74-075 E1 Paseo Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO: 138 C The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of February 3, 1981 CONTINUED TO DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. X APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 683 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL , FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environ- mental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the datb of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ NOTE: PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicant's Signature cc: Coachella Valley Water District ✓File PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION AT THEIR MEETING OF DECEMBER 9, 1980. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of December 9, 1980, approving: CASE NO. 138 C - Preliminary plans for athletic club and ' 49 unit motel located 900 feet east of Highway 111, between Park View Drive and Cactus Drive for ROBERT MCLACHLAN, WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient tacts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board action of December 9, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of December 9, 1980. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 17th day of December, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /lr 1 CHARLES MILLER, Chairman 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 :REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO: 138 C APPLICANT: Robert McLachlan and Kurt Donat NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plansfor athletic Club and 49 unit motel. LOCAIION: 900 ft. east of Highway 111, between Park View Drive and Cactus Drive. ZONE: PC (4), S.P. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and fy the applicant, the Design Review Board continued this project. Date of Action: November 25, 1980 Vote: 5-0 STAFF COMMENTS: See attached minutes. MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD NOVEMBER 25, 1980 Page Three ****************************************** III. CASES (cont.) Case No. TT 13915 - GEORGETOWN INDUSTRIAL PARK - Approval of landscaping plans for perimeter of Industrial park at the southwest corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane; Fred Arbuckle and Pat Martin were present. The Board noted that Pinus Eldarica should be substituted for the Pinus Pinea. There was additional discussion pertaining to perimeter wall height, landscaping and when perimeter treatment is to be done. The possible use of drip irrigation was discussed and determined not feasible for this project. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Holden, the Board approved this request subject of the following conditions: 1. Pinus Pinea to be changed to 20" box size Pinus Eldarica. 2. Perimeter walls to be 6 feet in height, measured at rear of insert in wall; top of wall height to be level around entire perimeter. 3. Prior to recordation of final tract map, CC&R's shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Services for approval, to insure compliance with all conditions of Resolution No. 78-172 and to insure that provisions are made for perpetual maintenance of private streets and perimeter landscaping. 4. Perimeter walls and landscaping to be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for first building. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, Johnson, Martin) Case No. 138 C - ROBERT MCLACHLAN - Preliminary approval of plans for athletic club and 49 unit motel, 900 feet east of Hwy 111, between Park View Drive and Cactus Drive; Kurt Donat and Bill Fitch were present. The Board reviewed the submitted plans and discussed concerns regarding shading of glass, landscaping, drainage, circulation, and trash pickup. It was determined that shading of glass on the south, east and west was inadequate. The applicant explained how they felt their project would help alleviate flooding of the adjacent neighborhood. It was noted that the applicant had previously stated to the Planning Commission that the site would drain to Park View Drive. With regard to circulation, the Board felt it may be advisable to provide turnarounds at the end of the parking lot and circulation around the athletic club. Also, the question of trash pickup was discussed. The applicant stated that the parking lot lights would be downshining black - box lights. The applicant was advised to use Hybrid Bermuda instead of Bluegrass, and Star Jasimine instead of Ivy. Also, Bottle Trees should be substituted for Eucalyptus. On a motion by Jackson, seconded by Cook, the Board continued this request to December 9, with all the above items of concern to be studied prior to a reconsideration. Carried 5-0 (Cook, Holden, Jackson, Johnson, Martin) Case No. 531 SA - PRELUDE DEVELOPMENT CO. (MILTON'S) - Approval of amendment to sign program for restaurant at southwest corner of Hwy 74 and Hwy ill; Ernie Pasty was present. continued... PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 683 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION AT THEIR MEETING OF DECEMBER 9, 1980. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California did review the Design Review Board actions of December 9, 1980, approving: I CASE NO.138 C - Preliminary plans for Athletic Club and 49 Unit Motel located 900 feet east of Highway 111, between Park View Drive and Cactus Drive for ROBERT MCLACHLAN. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board action of December 9, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of December 9, 1980. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 3rd day of February, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KRYDER, RICHARDS NOES: NONE ABSENT: MILLER ABSTAIN: MCLACHLAN CHARLES MILLER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa Z INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: Stan Sawa FROM: Director of Public Works SUBJECT: DP-10-80 AND 138C DATE: November 25, 1980 The grading plan as submitted drains less than ten percent of the site to Park - view Drive. The remainder drains to Cholla Drive and Cactus Drive which is the natural drainage, at this time, but with more drainage being concentrated at Cactus Drive per this plan. To answer your specific question, the site could be graded in such a manner to completely drain towards Parkview Drive. However, this would quite probably create a minimum of a 3-foot fill to the rear of the site. Fill material would probably have to be imported to accomplish this. The conditions of approval established by Resolution No. 647 appear adequate. My only suggestion would be to add the requirement that if the grading plan is approved as submitted, that the applicant's civil engineer provide hydraulic calculations that Cactus Drive can accommodate the total runoff. And if it can't, offsite facilities shall be constructed to carry the increased runoff. I would only question Special Condition No. 8 which specifies a 25-foot half street. Is this a minimum City standard or is 30-foot half street the mini- mum with curb face at 20-feet from centerline instead of 18-feet from centerline? I hope this information is helpful to you and please contact me if I can be of further assistance. BARRY McCLELLAN DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BM/ms Enclosures y� 8AR8ARAlintfJR. Ly! ✓ lop S r44 i c.o , yea 1 sss - CHOL OR isasJ ss.s CACTUS ' DR ,s15 7 BRUSHWOOD - DR 7sr:s� i. 7-e 6, 8? Acre T fo/ t. ��•p • �,� Red = l%roir7age FlrQ•o e r1 ;98,5 FC. 3/4„ 1 P Wi = SUR.TAC,FIJ: PER R.S.51/57 E 1, 954,E 56.17 N 566,3E3.33 � '�bs _,�c.ur�, �O r e/wo rn WAG Lo"L"4.. . a+ W.i' 1 G GL� ICJ ,S S.e� [APu 1as6 LA� City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attn: Stan Sawa November 17, 1980 City Planner Dear Stan: The area 1 thru 4 shown on the attached map, indicates the desired flow of surface drainage concerned with the Desert Athletic Club. All existing surface flow north of Park View drain in the Palm Valley Channel. The City of :3aiicho Mirage is planning an open channel along the north side of Park View to provide for the control of storm waters west of Highway 111. Therefore the only water contribution to the site in question is area 1 shown on the attached sketch. On the site of the Athletic Club, area 2 will drain to Park View, area 3 will drain to Cholla Drive, and area 4 will drain to Cactus Drive. Total quanity of surface flow to Cactus Drive is 14.5 C.F.S. Street capacity is about 15 C.F.S. Q25 = Al + A4 X I X C Q25 = 5 X 3.15 X .90 = 14.2 C.F.S. - drains to Cactus Drive Q25 = A3 X I X C 1.23 X 3.15 X .90 = 3.5 C.F.S. - drains to Cholla Drive. Sincerely, RONALD W. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES Wm. H. Fitch RCE Office Manager WF/ma CC: City Engineer Ron Martin RONALD W. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES 74-075 EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CA Kurt Donat Associates Architecture Interior Design Transmittal Date: December 3, 1980 Project Name: DESERT ATHLETIC CLUB AND RESORT To: CITY OF PALM DESERT L i i 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 DEC - 11 i980 ATTENTION: Stan B. Sawa LiJVinsN`ui€N i,,L CITY OF PALM DESERT Attached: ❑ Working Drawings ❑ Prints IX Plans ❑ Copies Date As -. - •. . . •. r - -• Transmitted: ❑ For Approval MYFor Your Use ❑ For Review and Comment Copies to: Signed: Barry Adnams 446 N. Newport Blvd. Suite 101 Newport Beach, Ca. 92663 714 645 4170 PROJECT; Desert Athletic Club and Resort Site Landscaping Legend: TREES Pheonix Dactylipera "Date Palm" 20' to 30' High Rhus Lances "African Sumac" 36" Box Unless Otherwise Noted Eucalyptus Rudis "Desert Gum" 75% 24" Box Unless Otherwise Noted and 25% 15 Gallon Melaleuca Linariifolia 75% 24" Box Unless Otherwise Noted and 25% 15 Gallon Sterculia Diversifolia 75% 24" Box Unless Otherwise Noted and 25% 15 Gallon GROUND COVER Hybrid Bermuda (Tif Green) Gazania Uniflora Leucoleana 12" O.C. Trachelosperium Jasminoides "Star Jasmine" 1 Gallon 18" O.C. Stream Area Nerium Oleander Dwarf "Single Pink" 5 Gallon 30" O.C. SHRUBS 5 Gallon Containers 1. Xylosma Congestrum 2. Lantana Camera 3. Pittosporum Tobira Agapanthus Africanus 2 Gallon FLOWERS Annuals Quart Size VINES Parthenocissus Tricuspidata "Boston Ivy" 1 Gallon Clytostoma Callistegopes "Trumpetvine" 15 Gallon Bouganvillea 5 Gallon A. California Gold B. Texas Dawn Bignonia Tweediana "Cat Claw Yellow Trumpet" 5 Gallon D D O - 11980 _r��1':L S. V ItiES C13 '?F PALM ":t:1T DfPA :ANT 15' PROJECT; Desert Athletic Club and Resort Site Landscaping Legend: TREES Pheonix Dactylipera "Date Palm" 20' to 30' High Rhus Lances "African Sumac" 36" Box Unless Otherwise Noted Eucalyptus Rudis "Desert Gum" 75% 24" Box Unless Otherwise Noted and 25% 15 Gallon Melaleuca Linariifolia 75% 24" Box Unless Otherwise Noted and 25% 15 Gallon Sterculia Diversifolia 75% 24" Box Unless Otherwise Noted and 25% 15 Gallon GROUND COVER Hybrid Bermuda (Tif Green) Gazania Uniflora Leucoleana 12" O.C. Trachelosperium Jasminoides "Star Jasmine" 1 Gallon 18" O.C. Stream Area Nerium Oleander Dwarf "Single Pink" 5 Gallon 30" O.C. SHRUBS 5 Gallon Containers 1. Xylosma Congestrum 2. Lantana Camera 3. Pittosporum Tobira Agapanthus Africanus 2 Gallon FLOWERS Annuals Quart Size VINES Parthenocissus Tricuspidata "Boston Ivy" 1 Gallon Clytostoma Callistegopes "Trumpetvine" 15 Gallon Bouganvillea 5 Gallon A. California Gold B. Texas Dawn Bignonia Tweediana "Cat Claw Yellow Trumpet" 5 Gallon Dot; - 1 1980 ENViI, JfG;�i c:v iF,L SERVICES DESERT Ir€Ty OF FA1VI DrvE-7T w i 4t1~.i'E'i f1F ZNVIS?.G°` )EMTAL B'W"RVI�CES FX111M NQ. Fes/" 4 AGENDA ITEM NO. III B-1 DATE November 25, 1980 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 138C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) ROBERT MC LACHLAN (74-075 E1 Paseo, Palm Desert, California, 92260) and KURT DONAT (446 N. Newport Blvd. #101, Newport Beach, California 92663). NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary approval of plans for athletic club and 49 unit motel. LOCATION 900 feet east of Hiahwav 111. between Park View Drive and Cactus Drive. ZONE P.C. (4) S.P. This case received conceptual approval by the Planning Commission, as DP 10-80, on October 15, 1980. Attached is Resolution No. 647 with the conditions of approval. The preliminary plans submitted, comply with the conceptual approval. The attached plans and specifications reflect the proposed project. Major concerns raised by the Commission, were compatibility with the residential uses to the east, directing drainage away from the residential areas, and vacation of Cholla Drive to allow the project. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the plans and would offer the following comments: 1. Some landscaping materials are not appropriate for desert environment, and should be changed. 2. Protection or shading of glass areas is inadequate on most exposures, and therefore, should be increased. 3. Parking lot light fixtures must be a type that directs the rays downward and away from adjacent residences. 4. On site drainage should be directed to Park View Drive. Staff recommends that if these plans are approved, that the following conditions be imposed: 1. 3 foot wide planter along west property line, be increased to 4 feet. 2. Blank wall on south elevation of athletic club to be planted with clinging vines. 3. Parking lot lights (10 feet high) not approved at this time; applicant to submit light fixture specs and drawing for approval with final drawings; light to be type in which light is downshining and source is recessed in box. 4. No 8 foot high sphere lights to be used between parking lot and first row of motel units. 5. Prior to submission of final working drawings to Design Review Board, proof of compliance with special condition Nos. 1,2,8,11, and 12 of Resolution 647 to be presented to staff. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. III B-1 Page Two 4 6. Wall screening parking area on Park View Drive, to be 3 feet 2 inches in height. 7. Submit sign color samples for approval, with final working drawings. Based on the staff comments, conditions of approval and development standards, the Board should determine acceptability of submitted plans. Should these plans be acceptable, staff will forward your recommendation with any conditions, to the Planning Commission for confirmation. 9 ...wlllllw„ ..�ulllm._. I Ill ! IIIIIIIIIN Ill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllll� IItl11iI1111Jlllllnllly111111111111111 .. �; .:"� _�. /es alGr.v�„— E. rIJ :�'3 �_�. �• i 1 I �,y4. 11 lnl •. n�l�ilnunlllnall�rrnn ..I III •. � G I �,¢e�l 1 i Y YY t. '• a^ - �I(III l4 Jill a New. A p . u v .,IuISC4,..•- ..nun... East Elemtbn OC ..................... � I 77-77 77 I #,Nor ILI Ow MUMFM - Rim y 2"m L zU 00 o� Y PROJECT: Desert Athletic Club and Resort Site Landscaping Legend: Trees Pheonix Dactylipera 20' to 30' High Schinus Molle M" Box Unless Otherwise Noted Eucalyptus Sideraoxylon Hosea 75% 24" Box Unless Otherwise Noted and 25% 15 Gallon Melaleuca Linariifolia 75% 24" Box Unless Otherwise Noted and 25% 15 Gallon Ground Cover Hedera Helix Vinca Minor Blue Grass Sod Hedge Ligustrium Japonica 5 Gallon @ 30" O.C. Shrubs 5 Gallon Containers 1. Xylosma Congestum 2. Lantana Camera 3. Pittosporum Tobira Agapanthus Africanus 2 Gallon Annuals Quart Size Vines Parthenocissus Tricuspidata "Boston Ivy" 1 Gallon Clytostoma Callistegiopes "Trumpetvine" 15 Gallon Kurt Donat 446 N. Newport Boulevard Suite 101 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Robert R. McLachlan 74-075 E1 Paseo Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Robert R. McLachlan 74-075 E1 Paseo Drive Palm Desert, CA 92260 Kurt Donat 446 N. Newport Boulevard Suite 101 Newport Beach, CA 92663 t City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attn: Stan Sawa November 17, 1980 City Planner Dear Stan: The area 1 thru 4 shown on the attached map, indicates the desired flow of surface drainage concerned with the Desert Athletic Club. All existing surface flow north of Park View drain in the Palm Valley Channel. The City of Rancho Mirage is planning an open channel along the north side of Park View to provide for the control of storm waters west of Highway 111. Therefore the only water contribution to the site in question is area 1 shown on the attached sketch. On the site of the Athletic Club, area 2 will drain to Park View, area 3 will drain to Cholla Drive, and area 4 will drain to Cactus Drive. Total quanity of surface flow to Cactus Drive is 14.5 C.F.S. Street capacity is about 15 C.F.S. Q25 = Al + A4 X I X C Q25 = 5 X 3.15 X .90 = 14.2 C.F.S. - drains to Cactus Drive Q25 = A3 X I X C 1.23 X 3.15 X .90 = 3.5 C.F.S. - drains to Cholla Drive. Sincerely, RONALD W. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES Wm. H. Fitch RCE Office Manager WF/ma CC: City Engineer Ron Martin RONALD W. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES 74-075 EL PASEO PALM DESERT, CA Sd31Nlb'd u 2?0 ._. I � ',� psi. _....___-•� � 2i6...._. woe t, ,. • •+ • a m v I v o t - a 4• « to .. "+ CS !Iqw � b N it Nb . �.�� ate` b 4. ,.,• -� �✓OSHUA� ,r u� �s row- Pool� r PA! M o — VALLEY o.d r.•.�°` y A (Y111 � y r m to P Ll n � INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: BARRY MCCLELLAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES SUBJECT: CASE NO. DP 10-80 and 138 C DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1980 DP 10-80 was approved by the Planning Commission October 15, 1980. At that time, the Acting Director of Public Works had no comments on the project because a grading plan was not available. Grading plans and information have been submitted for design approval and are attached. At the Public Hearing for this item, the applicant's representative assured the neighbors and Planning Commission that on -site water would be directed to Park View Drive. The submitted information does not seem to do that. Can you please review and let me know if that can be done. Attached is the Planning Commission Resolution with the conditions of approval. Any other comments or conditions are welcome at this time since they are now asking for preliminary design approval. We can require new conditions or modifications to their plans. This is scheduled for the Design Review Board Tuesday, November 25, at 2:30 p.m. If you can respond by then, it would be appreciated. I know it is short notice. If you cannot make it Tuesday, a response by Friday, November 28, would suffice. Thank you, STAN SAWA ASSOCIATE PLANNER /lr PROJECT: Desert Athletic Club and Resort Exterior Material and Color Selections Desert Athletic Club: Symbol Description Material Color Exterior Walls Hand applied exterior La Habra X-86 plaster Sandstone yRoof Tile Craycroft Brick Co. No. 8 Blend Normandy Flat Clay Shingle Tile Wood Trellis Resawn Douglas Fir Olympic Stain 3 725 Semi -transparent Exterior Doors and Aluminum storefront Dark Bronze with 4 Windows with glass solar bronze glass 5 Exterior Paving Bomanite Stamped Concrete Maxican Tile r°G Block Walls 6"x8"x16" Slump Block Ameritone 296 C Potato Skin RC Sign Channel illuminated Match Sinclair 554-V plexiglass face fetters Desert Resort - 16 Unit Building and Registration Building: Exterior Walls Hand applied exterior La Habra X-86 plaster Sandstone Roof Tile Life Tile Terracotta Blend Z^ Espana Mission "S" Tile } Wood Trim and Eaves Resawn Douglas Fir Old Quaker 145 Solid Balcony Railings and Resawn Douglas Fir Old Quaker 153 Solid Trellis R Windows Aluminum Sliding Glass Painted dark bronze IZ Block Walls 8"x8"x16" Slump Block Ameritone 296-C Potato Skin Exterior Doors Raised Panel Wood Olympic Stain 725 Semi -transparent Ft Accent Color at Wood French Doors Sinclair 554-V Registration Building Traffic Circle Paving Stamped concrete Bomanite Brick Red 9 PROJECT: Desert Athletic Club and Resort Site Landscaping Legend: Trees Pheonix Dactylipera 20' to 30' High Schinus Molle 36" Box Unless Otherwise Noted Eucalyptus Sideraoxylon Rosea 75% 24" Box Unless Otherwise Noted and 25% 15 Gallon Melaleuca Linariifolia 75% 24" Box Unless Otherwise Noted and 25% 15 Gallon Ground Cover Hedera Helix Vinca Minor Blue Grass Sod Hedge Ligustrium Japonica 5 Gallon @ 30" O.C. Shrubs 5 Gallon Containers 1. Xylosma Congestum 2. Lantana Camera 3. Pittosporum Tobira Agapanthus Africanus 2 Gallon Flowers Annuals Quart Size Vines Parthenocissus Tricuspidata "Boston Ivy" 1 Gallon Clytostoma Callistegiopes "Trumpetvine" 15 Gallon YQ)MR9 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Robert R. McLachlan Applicant (please prim) 74-075 El Paseo Drive 56875944 Mailing Address Telephone Palm Desert,'CA 92260 City State Zip -Code REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) �2a_l IVYI t'fv9(I� Requesthplanning approval for the cipupInnmenta on a 3.92 acre site, of a 49 unit resort motel with registration and recreation building and a 30,000 S.F. athletic club. C PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:. 3.92 acre level undeveloped site 900 ft. East of Highway 111. Property bounded by Park View Drive to the North and Cactus Drive to the South. ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. 621-312-029 and-621-312-015 , EXISTING ZONING Resort Commercial Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED AT THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER IS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- /Jr."]ON FOR THE ILI OF THIS APPLICATION. k ICJ SI RE DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT CF A LIABI IES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNM H1 AG EEM I ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRICTIONS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. * /v � Applicant's Signature / SIGNATUREIIATE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER ACCEPTED BY CASE No. Ivc- _ REFERENCE CASE NO Z O The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. DEPARTMENT DESIGN ( PLANNING APPLICATION OF ENVIRON- REVIEW (—\ COMMISSION MENTAL BOARD (APPROVES OR SERVICES (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT) STA F F INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS PROCESSING SCHEDULE: a DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND b CONSTRUC' SAFETY ION SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings -to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. STAFF USE ONLY: Date Received Date of ACTOR "Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED Staff DRB P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review Of: CASE NO. 49 Unit Commercial Resort and 30 000 S.F. Athletic Club. Type of Project Robert R. McLachlan Applicant 74-075 E1 Paseo Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other appTicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed sha,31 be installed underground as a part of development fromMequid existing pole not on the property being developed unicipal Code. %Vff?7 Signature Date Department of Environmental Services Form 1 CASE NO. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CHECKLIST INITIAL PLAN REVIEW NOTE: Planning Division Staff are required to reject applications if any applicable exhibits are not received and checked. I. Completed Application Form (one (1) copy) II. Address labels for project sponsors (two (2) copies, gummed labels & typed list) Not required for a single-family dwelling / application, or staff approved signs. ✓ III. Detailed Plot Plan A. Design Review Board and Commission' Review/Approval A. - Three (3) full size (one (1) of which is to be colored) - One (1) reduced copy (8Z"x1l", or 1311) B. Staff Approval B. Three (3) full size IV. Information Sheet and/or Plan Block V. Site Analysis & Preliminary Drainage and Grading Plan (Three (3) copies, may be com- bined, where appropriate, with plot plan) VI. Architectural Elevations (all sides of the building(s)) A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/ Approval A. - Three (3) full size (one (1) of which is to be color keyed) - One (1) reduced copy (82"xll" or 1311) B. Staff Approval B. I� - Three (3) full size DRB Checklist Page Two ** VII. Sign Program (elevation(s) and details, if applicable) - Three (3) copies to scale IZ VIII. Color and Material Exhibits - Color and Materials written description (one (1) copy) !/ - Color and Materials sample board (max. 81'xl3", 3/8" thick) IX. Floor and Roof Plans - Three (3) copies to scale * X. Landscape Plan (3 copies, 1 colored) - Plant List, (1 copy) / * XI. Exterior Lighting Plan (3 copies) r/ XII. Filing Fee A. Commission Review/Approval ($50.00) A. B. Staff approval, single-family dwellings ($15.00) B. Q C. Sign Program Only ($15.00 DRB or C. $10.00 Staff) * Items X and XI may be combined. ** Sign Program only - submit items IIIB, VI, VII, VIII, and Sign Fee. Initial Plan Exhibits Received and Checked by: / Ping. Div. Staff Date FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS I. Three (3) copies of drawings to be submitted for plan check. Drawings must reflect all Conditions of Approval. Final Construction Drawings Received by: / Ping. Div. Staff Date DESIGY-DE'VIEW BOARD PROCESS Required Submittal Detail NOTE: Applications will not be processed until the application and all required materials are found to be complete. INITIAL PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM: One (1) copy. Fill out completely and secure all signatures. Attach a sheet listing parties directly involved in representing the project (such as architect, engineer, etc.) and their addresses and tele- phone numbers. lx, LABELS FOR PROJECT (Application) SPONSORS: One (1) set ICJ of gummed address labels shall be typed and submitted with the name and address of all persons to whom the Planning Commission action is to be sent (owner, architect, engineer, etc.). NOT required for a single-family residence on` an individual lot, or staff approval of signs. III. DETAILED PLOT PLAN: A. Items to be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board and Planning Commission require the plot plan submittal described below. 1. Three (3) full size plans completely dimensioned and at a scale not smaller than 1 inch = 40 feet, showing the following data: - Scale ' - North arrow - Property lines - Lot dimensions - Public rights -of -way with existing and proposed dimensions (include street names) - Existing or proposed curb lines - Any and all easements - All utility line locations (gas, electric, cable, water, and sewer) - Adjacent property uses (showing approximate loca- tion of structures and other pertinent features) - Major vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access points to and from site (use arrows of different widths to show direction and intensity of use) - Setback areas - All existing and proposed structures - Interior vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian circula- tion patterns (if applicable) - Off-street parking (to include spaces, regulatory devices, provisions for accessory vehicle storage where applicable, etc.) - Parking areas for bicycles and carts (if applicable) - Service areas and facilities to include: 1) trash storage areas 2) mail delivery boxes 3) loading areas DRB Proces Page Two III. DETAILED PLOT PLAN: (Cont.) A. 1. (Cont.) - Perimeter fencing and screening - Proposed sign locations (if applicable) - Project phasing, showing the stages of construc- tion for the entire development - One (1) copy of the plot plan multi -colored in- dicating open space/landscaping, buildings, park- ing, and driveways. Where more than one height of building is proposed, show each in a different color. DO NOT MOUNT THIS COPY ON A BOARD. 2. One (1) copy of the plot plan containing all of the general information described above, except that it is to be drafted or photographically reduced to an 8A11xll" or 13" size sheet. (All lettering to be legible; include graphic scale). B. Items to be reviewed and approved by Planning Division Staff only require three (3) full size copies of the plot plan described above. (i.e. single-family dwelling and signs valued under $1,000.) IV. INFORMATION SHEET AND/OR PLAN BLOCK: As appropriate, include an attached sheet to the application and/or specify directly on the plans, in an information block, the following data: - Owner's name, address, and phone number - Designer's name, address, and phone number - Any special information or conditions pertaining to the site or to the plans - Acreage and square footage calcualations - Ratio of structures to total land area - Ratioof parking spaces to building square footage - Parking requirements provided - Ratio of landscaping to total land area - Any specific information of special conditions particularly relevant to the project V. SITE ANALYSIS & PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN: Three (3) copies of a plan indicating the data described below (in- formation may be incorporated into the plot plan where detail is not obscurred or prepared as a separate exhibit): - Vicinity map showing major street names, other reference points and landmarks (no scale) - North arrow - Scale - General drainage pattern of area to include site and adja- cent properties within 100' (use arrows to show drainage flow to and from site). - Existing contour lines including property corners - Proposed locations of structures and drives - Elevations of pads and finished floors - Finished grades - Elevations of existing street centerline - Retaining walls (where applicable) - Perimeter walls and fences which affect drainage Sylvia G. Richardson 2248 Port Durneff P1. Newport Beach, CA 92260 W. W. Myrick Stanley C. Morse Maurine D. Myrick Consulting Civil Engineers c/o Valley Bank & Trust 73-255 E1 Paseo, Suite 8 P. O. Box 450 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Salt Lake City, Utah 84110 Alex Sherman 18591 Hillhaven Dr. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Blanchard Granville 230 Oakridge St. Holly Hill, FL 32017 Ronald Goodwin Carol R. Goodwin 101 Belleza Anaheim, CA 92807 Peter Leggett Carol M. Leggett 44682 Monaco Cir. Palm.Desert, CA 92260 Kenneth A. Boone 44596 Monaco Cir. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Albert Rieder Annette G. Rieder 3825 Hillway Dr. Glendale, CA 91208 Richard E. Watkins, Jr. 3303 Wilshire Blvd., 560 Los Angeles, CA 90010 James McArthur 735 Granvia Valmonte Palm Springs, CA 92262 Southern California Edison P. O. Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770 Stanley C. Morse Consulting Civil Engineers 73-255 E1 Paseo, Suite 8 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Bernie Solomon BPS Development 3140 E. Willow Long Beach, CA 90806 Walter R. Schmid Margaret K. Schmid 7931 Lampson Ave. Garden Grove, CA 92641 Jack C. Seibert Virginia A. Seibert Box 70 Mt. Hamilton Rd. San Jose, CA 95116 Evalyn A. Schwartz 432 West Valencia Ave. Burbank, CA 91506 John M. Bash Gloria Bash 45466 Garden Square Palm Desert, CA 92260 Joseph M. Buccino Anita Buccino 34 San Sebastian Rd. Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Dateland Mutual Water Co. 74360 'Erin St. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Lewis Homes of California 1156 N. Mountain Ave. Upland, CA 91786 Peter Demos, Ruth Demos, George Demos P. 0. Box 1532 Palm Desert, CA 922.60 Naegele Outdoor Advertisi c/o Leon Howell 4129 E. Palm Canyon Dr. Palm Springs, CA 92262 Mario R. Lopez Joseph E. Rapkin Hidden Palms Homeowners Dora A. Lopez c/o Michael W. Hatch P. O. Box 792 3636 Crooked Creek Dr. 777 E. Wisconsin Ave. Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 Diamond Bar, CA 91766 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Gerrit J. Goudswaard Carlene H. Goudswaard 44755 Deep Canyon Palm Desert, CA 92260 Malin E. Kibbe Henry L. Grace P. O. Box 1596 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Ellis G. Thomas, Jr. Marie N. Thomas 6911 Langley Canyon Rd. Salinas, CA 92901 Joseph Weinstein Selma Weinstein 607 S. Hill St., Suite 921 Los Angeles, CA 90014 i Albert, Joan Glowicki Edward, Gladys Erickson 1875 Caminito Ascua La Jolla, CA 92037 Sadie L. Elliott Marion L. Kenny 44835 Deep Canyon Palm Desert, 'CA - 92260 Don & Marge Battles Harrison Hertzberg / Antoinette Hertzber- 355o Wilshire Blvd,.1418 Los. Angeles, CA 90010 Leslie Fund, Inc. 3600 W. Lake Ave.. Glenview, IL 60025 rl i Joseph E. Rapkin. Beatrice Rapkin 777 E. Wisconsin Ave, 3800 Milwaukee,' WI 53202 Wayne A. Burns Shirley M. Burns 1321 Koopman Way La Habra, CA 90631 Patrick S. Paris Beverly A. Paris 44469 Cannes Ct. Palm Desert, CA 92260 David J. Ofstedahl Patricia Ofstedahl 44459 Cannes Ct. Palm Desert,.CA 92260 -Richard L: Kuxhaus I Deep Canyon Ltd. Phyllis S. Kuxhaus i 2101 E. 4th St. . 11552 West Pico Blvd. Santa Ana, Ca 92701 Los Angeles, CA 90064 Deep Canyon Ltd. 2101 E. 4th St: Santa Ana, CA 92701 William Bronstein Rosalyn F. Bronstein 1052 Driftwood Dr. Palm Springs, CA 92262 William C. Johnston Martin Lasker 4823 Whitsett Ave. North Hollywood, CA 9160 Sherri Chessen Diana H. Cotter 44529 Cannes Ct. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Edwin B. Pettingill Doris Pettingill 726 Rose Ave. 17--4-- nA an9Q1 William J. Mann Richard J. Egan 8900 Evanview Dr. Los Angeles, CA 90069 Mendell B. Smith Edward G. Sullivan Larry & Audrey Lakoduk Ruth K. Smith Phyllis J. Sullivan James ,& Linda Lakoduk 8346 Beverly Dr. 44419 Baden Ct. Box 2983 San Gabriel, CA 91775 1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Fargo,, ND 58102 Donald R. Scott Zachary Sacks Bill N. Daugherty Judith A. Scott V. Salley Sacks Karin-L. Daugherty 11341 Cielo Pl. 2121 Cloverfield Blvd. 144509 Sorrento Ct. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Woodland Hills, CA 913641 I Palm Desert, CA 92260 - -- -- --- - -- Morton J. Liebert - ------ -- Telly Savalas I Sarkis A. Kitsinian Lorraine Liebert i c/o Tucker, Morgan, j Suzan S. Kitsinian Michael I. Liebert Martindale & Co. 144751 Monaco Cir. 44389 Cannes Ct. 9200 Sunset Blvd. Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA. 92260 Los, Angeles, CA 90069 Gwen A. Carter Richard R. Bradshaw James A. Schelble Jan R. Kopic Constance L. Bradshaw 1111 E. Lilac Lane Kirk L. Kopic 44389 Baden Ct. Milwaukee, WI 53217 44379 Cannes Ct: Palm Desert, CA 92260 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Alex M. Greenberger John Bradley Julian Ogden Lea Greenberger Vivian Greenwood Constance Ogden 44509 Baden Ct. 4229 Chestnut ;l 44725 Monaco Cir. Palm Desert,.CA 92260 I Long Beach, CA 90807 I Palm Desert, CA 92260 � Alvin Markovitz Arthur Heatley Lorna Schelble Pamela'Markovitz Ruth M. Heatley 1111 E. Lilac Ln. 14935 Altata Dr. 44369 Baden Ct. j Milwaukee, VI 53217 Pacific Palisades, CA Palm Desert, CA 92260 90272 �I Anthony Maniscalco, Donald Franco Ann K. Macomber .Robert Mitchell, Antoino Rose Franco Sandpiper #15 C.- & Diana Maniscalco 44599 Sorento Ct. Palm Desert, CA 92260 1885 N. Crescent Heights i Palm Desert, CA 92260 Los. Angeles, CA 90048 Riverside Palms Willis, Gertrude,^Louis, 2953 S. Pullman St. i Norman Curry Christie Jones Santa Ana, CA 92705 22512 Aliso Park Dr. 44619 Monaco Cir. i E1 Toro, CA 92630 Palm Desert, CA 92260 I Steven C. Pilkington Deep Canyon Ltd. Wayne Barlow Joan P. Pilkington 44589 Sorrento Ct. Elizabeth J. Barlow 15 Branding Iron Ln. Palm Desert, CA 92260 2049 Century Park East 8' Rolling Hills Estates, Los Angeles, CA 90067 California 90274 Lorraine E. Watson Deep Canyon Ltd. Thomas G. Shultis 942 Shoreline Dr. 1601 E. Flamingo, Suite 1 Marion M. Shultis San Mateo, CA 94404 Las Vegas, NV 89109 44681 Monaco Cir. Palm Desert, CA 92260 William B. Smith Deep Canyon Ltd. Beverly Clark Katherine B. Smith 1604 Island Dr. 44671 Monaco-Cir. 44379 Baden Ct. Fullerton, CA 92633 Palm Desert, CA 92260 A, O 0 04 k C14 O r l V- co Go t ; . ir %� f Z�pi r I- E 0 n �i� 0 % uj 4 1 v Aa I/V Jr F L r L LU LLJ Ln < = z Cn u 0 00, 0 w u < LLI 0 LLJ LU U) CO -% ui < U- LL LL. 0 LLI ul z z (D