The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About153C SUNRISE COMPANYUNRISE COMPANY CONSULTANTS IN CIVIL ENGINEERIN 69 1-500 MONTEREY AVE. & LAND PLANNING CC ALM DESERT, CA 71-537 HIGHWAY 111 714/328-8945 RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 7 714/568-5997 BC%L,DL\G /�fCl CONSTRUCTION STANDARD: 1979 U.P.C. OCCUPANCY B 2 ZONE CLASSIFICATION: PC.2 BUILDING SUMMARY ADMINISTRATION ACCOUNTING CONSTRUCTION CLUB OPERATIONS MECH., ELEC. & STAIRS 1981 N.E.C. TOTAL BUILDING AREA ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA 8,000 sq. ft.- BASE AREA 1D0% 8,000 a- ft•- OPEN AREA 4 SIDES 16,000 sq. ft.- ONE STORY MAX. (FIRST FLR. 4,600 sq. ft. 5,080 5,000 3,890 1,050 19,600 sq. ft. MAX.) (14,680 sq. ft. ACTUAI 100% 16 00_ O_ s_ASE MAXTI6LDGRYAREARE(ALL FLOORS) 32,000 sq. - LEGAL DESCRIPTION . PARCEL 10. 1 OF TRACT 17474 RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE To: See Distribution SUBJECT The Lakes - Sidewalks cc CATE. July 23, 1981 FROM: Phil Smith Barry McLellan (Public Works Director) confirmed the following: 1. 8 foot sidewalk/bike path is required along Country Club Drive and west side of Cook Street. Must meander. 2. 5 foot sidewalk is required along east side of Cook Street. Must be parallel to curb (not meandering). 3. Configuration of sidewalks on both sides of Administration Building (southeast corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive) will be subject to Design Review Board approval. Neither Public Works nor Environmental Services will oppose straight sidewalks constructed immediately adjacent to curb. PKS : mm Distribution: Jack Conlon Gary Berger Jack Newville Don Brinkerhoff Bob Altevers Barry McLellan ,,Stan Sawa. (Uf4h� o0 1F)EK1n=ra r�t� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DATE August 6, 1981 APPLICANTS) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SUNRISE COMPANY 41-500 Monterey Ave Palm Desert, CA 92260 Attn: Phillip Smith, Jr. CASE NO: LC The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of August 4, 1981 [KIN1111VII171i01 DENIED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. X_ APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 732 . PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL , FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environ- mental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the datb of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ NOTE: PLEASE SIGN AND RETURN PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Applicant's Signature cc: Coachella Valley Water District File PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 732 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION AT ITS MEETING OF JULY 28, 1981. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of July 28, 1981, approving: CASE NO. 153 C - Preliminary and final plans for an 18,550 corporate office building located at the south- east corner of Country Club Drive and Cook Street for SUNRISE COMPANY. CASE NO. 152 C - Preliminary plans for an 18,000 square foot commercial building located at the north- west corner of Palms to Pines West - Phase II for ARCHULETA/ RICCIARDI ASSOCIATES. CASE NO. 151 C - Preliminary plans for an 1,800 square foot temporary bank fa- cility to be located at the southeast corner of Larkspur and El Paseo for PALM DESERT NATIONAL BANK. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board action of July 28, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of July 28, 1981. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 4th day of August, 1981, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KRYDER, RICHARDS, WOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: MILLER ABSTAIN: NONE CHARLES MILLER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY - JULY 28, 1981 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. after a 2 hour study session. MEMBERS PRESENT: Al Cook Ron Gregory Rick Holden (Arrived 3:15) Charles Martin Bernie Leung MEMBERS ABSENT: Phyllis Jackson Vern Barton STAFF PRESENT: Ramon A. Diaz Stan Sawa Steve Smith Patty Armitage On a motion by Cook, seconded by Gregory, the Board approved the minutes of July 7, 1981, as written. Motion carried 2-0-2 (Martin and Leung abstained) II. Minute Motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session: NONE III. CASES Case No. 120 C - MAY COMPANY - Final approval of site, elevations and landscaping plans. Jim Horasz of the architectural firm of Abrahamian, Pagliassotti and Tanaka was present on behalf of the applicant. The Chairman told Mr. Horasz that the Board had reviewed the plans during study session and noted a discrepancy.in the roof overhang and parapet over entrance number 3 as shown on detail 1 on page A-14. Mr. Tanaka previously had explained that the detail would be done in a different manner which would extend the overhang out further. Mr. Horasz indicated that the detail could be changed without affecting the rest of the plan. On a motion by Leung, seconded by Gregory, the Board approved the application for final approval of site, elevations and landscaping for May Company, subject to the following condition: 1. That the roof detail shown on page A-14 be modified in accordance with the Board requirements. Motion carried 3-0-1 (Cook Abstained). The Chairman explained that required modification will not delay the plan check procedure and the revisions can be brought to the Board informally at staff level as soon as they are available. Case No. 153 C - SUNRISE COMPANY - Preliminary and final approval of site, elevations and landscaping plans for corporate office building. Robert Altevers was present on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Smith highlighted the salient points from the staff report and indicated that staff had two concerns: MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING JULY 28, 1981 III. CASES (CONTINUED) 1. Skylights in the roof without solar protection. 2. Details on parking lot lighting had not been submitted. PAGE TWO In response to a question from the Board, Mr. Altevers said that the skylights were dual -paned. The Board agreed that the double paned skylights should be acceptable. The project's landscape architect was present and in response to a question, said that he was aware that some of the selected species may be susceptible to burning however, excellent maintenance should prevent this from happening. He concurred with the request that the Ligustrum Texanum be replaced with Lucidum. On a motion by Cook, seconded by Leung, the Board approved the application for preliminary and final plan approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That parking lot lighting details be provided for review by staff. 2. That on the landscape plan the Ligustrum Texanum be replaced with Ligustrum Lucidum. 3. That construction plans be submitted for approval of the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. Motion carried 4-0. Case No. 152 C - MILLARD ARCHULETA/ROBERT RICCIARDI ASSOC.- Preliminary approval of an 18,000 square foot commercial building. Al Cook was present on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Smith highlighted the salient points from the staff report. Mr. Cook advised the Board the windows in the roof area are recessed and provided with solar protection. The window area of the first floor is provided protection by a 4-6 foot roof overhang. In response to a question Mr. Cook advised that it may be possible to install a 3 foot high berm along the Highway III side of the building. On a motion by Gregory seconded by Leung, the Board approved the application for preliminary elevations and landscape plan subject to the following conditions: That a minimum 36" high berm be provided along the Highway Ill side of the building. 2. That the final plans provide a section view indicating how the proposed lake will be designed in relation to viewing from Highway 111. Motion carried 3-0-1 (Cook Abstained). ,ENDA ITEM NO. _III. B-1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 153 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS) SUNRISE COMPANY (41-500 Monterey Ave., Palm Desert; Attn: Phillip Smith Jr.) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT Preliminary and final approval of site, elevations and landscape plans for Corporate office building LOCATION Southeast corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive ZONE PC (2). S.P. Sunrise Company is proposing to construct an 18,550 square foot corporate office building on a 2.07 acre site at the southeast corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive. Site Plan The site plan proposed is in accordance with the development plan approval granted by the Planning Commission April 15, 1981. Elevational Treatment The architectural treatment is the same "ranch" style as to be used in the adjacent residential project. The roof will be jumbo cedar shake and the walls will be board and batten. Stone veneer covered pilasters support roof overhang structures and in addition large stone veneer fireplace chimneys are to be located on the north and south sides of the building Al.ong the southeast portion of the parking lot a covered parking area is proposed. The trellis will extend a distance of some 138 feet and provide shaded parking for 14 spaces. The total height of the trellis will be approximately 102 feet. Landscaping The preliminary landscape plan indicates that a variety of 6 tree types are proposed all at sizes of 24 inch box or greater. In addition, a wide variety of groundcover and shrubs are proposed. At the front of the building in the area adjacent to the intersection a large pond with waterfalls is indicated. Across the southeast property line adjacent to the residential property a 7' high block wall is proposed. A five foot strip of landscape area is provided in front of the wall. The development plan for the residential development to the southeast also provides for a landscape strip adjacent to the block wall. Solar Protection The solar protection provided to the building is basically adequate. The end walls which face south and east respectively have no glazed area and are finished in stone veneer - the rest of the building elevations oriented north-west and south-east have a substantial roof overhang. One area of concern i nvol ves the skylights proposed in the roof area. Some appropriate protection should be installed on these glazed areas. over... Staff Analysis: The applicant has submitted working drawings and based on staff review we would have no objection if the Board were to agree to grant preliminary and final approval subject to any conditions deemed appropriate by the Board which could be reviewed by staff. The Board should review the proposed plans to determine acceptability. Staff would suggest that any approval be subject to the following: 1. That appropriate solar protection be provided for the skylights. 2. That details of parking lot lighting be submitted; lights to be down -shining with light source hidden per Municipal Code requirements. Miscellaneous Items A trash enclosure is proposed at the southwest corner of the parking lot. The enclosure will be finished with board and batten similar to the main building. Details of parking lot lighting and landscape lighting have not been provided. These details should be provided especially considering the location of the office building relative to the residential property. The applicant advises that a sign program has not been developed at this time. When the sign program is ready, approval of the Board will be required. I , M!W► M.v� ' . 1 ti _ ----------------- t _ ti I lid v� sl:r R O •'` MINI.' i j4� Site Pks m ti �11•a f n Onwe ri n t{Yw wb flnMl �.Y �Yf• a.a N H^aoa nn41 e, w�yb�n�vn�m✓ay "'M �M/N M p rrJYw.Y� IIw[Y •Y• MM IH.IN 4N� r_ •nnN wr�,yr Y.wr.. .nns.�+un I. sMw{ vI\ L y.�qy{� {My ym�•��.w I��LLyyeryMryh M{ �M1MMI,y��•III\. N� yW�.�M1� �M�yyY �y�ry1�1M'nyYY�f �N J W�i•./•�µ�Y M LLM'.'""9uYlM fLsF�1 YYM MI'My. Q r -aLlr _ 1 1 , 1 1 1 I 1 1 � 1 1 1 � 1 4 1 �I 1 � 1. 1 1 I 1 1 I i {1` 1 � 1� �1 I 11,1\1E, siviIN IkI S I�ECEINI ; RECEIVED OF: DATE? �7�SQ/ p-7 AMOUN!rT�,o FOR rT <1C�� 40!=tJz PW 1� BY CITY TREASURER ACCOUNT NO. AMOUNT CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE o n vr�n 41-500 Monterey Avenue. Palm Desert, California 92260 --co Sunrise Company TO. Attn: Mr. Phillip K. Smith,Jr. 41-500 Monterey Ave. Palm Desert 92260 41-500 Monterey Avenue, Palm Desert. California 92260 --COMPANY-- TO: Sunrise Company Attn: Mr. Phillip K. Smith,Jr 41-500 Monterey Ave. Paom Desert 92260 2?0MR9 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION SUNRISE COMPANY Applicant ( please pit) 41-500 Monterey Avenue (714) 328-8945 Mailing Address Telephone Palm Desert, CA 92260 State REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) Zip -Cade Design Review Board approval for'Sunrise Company corporate office building at southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Cook Street DP 03-81). PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Portion of W 1/2 of NW 1/4, Section 10, T5S, R6E, SBM ASSESSOR IS PARCEL N0. 619-06-3 EXISTING ZONING PC 2- Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER (S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION. 7-15-81 GATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- ^� /{RICTIONS THAT MAYBE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. Applicants Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER ""^^'.". Jacx M. L:onion ACCEPTED BY CASE No. REFERENCE CASE NO. 7-15-81 DATE 7-15-81 DATE .The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. POOLS d DEPARTMENT DESIGN PLANNING f DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON- REVIEW COMMISSION r\ BUILDING AND MENTAL BOARD (APPROVES OR L �/ SAFETY SERVICES DENIES PROJECT) STAFF (ADVISORY) INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS PROCESSING SCHE CONSTRUCT ION SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. STAFF USE ONLY: Date Received Date of ACTOR Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED Staff ORB P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 A CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review Of: CASE NO. Sunrise Com an Office Buildin Type of Project SUNRISE COMPANY (Applicant) Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed A d y 7-15-81 ignature Date Jack M. Conlon Department of Environmental Services Form 1 F !\ `� �i� i July 16, 1981 Mr. Steve Smith City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA Re: Design Review Board - Sunrise Company Corporate Office Building Dear Steve: Enclosed is our application for Design Review Board approval of the Sunrise Company corporate office building to be constructed at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Cook Street. (The approved Development Plan for the office building is your Case No. DP 03-81). We request that this matter be placed on the Design Review Board's July 28, 1981, agenda. The following additional documents and information are also enclosed: 1. $50 filing fee. 2. Address labels for project sponsor (2). 3. Three copies of working drawings. Please note that Sheet A-2 ("Site Plan") is intended to satisfy the Design Review Board requirements of a detailed plot plan. (Also enclosed is a reduced size copy of Sheet A-2). Sheets A-10 and A-11 of the working drawings are exterior elevations of the building. 4. Color and materials written description. 5. Color and materials sample board. 41-500 Monterey Avenue, Palm Desert, California 92260 • Telephone 714 / 328-8945 BUILDER OF AMERICAS FINEST COUNTRY CLUB COMMUNITIES Page 2 6. Landscape plan (three copies, one colored; 3 reduced.) 7. Exterior lighting plan. Colored renderings of the building have already been submitted in connection with earlier approvals. We request that these be used as additional exhibits for the Design Review Board approval. I am enclosing reduced size copies of these renderings. As I discussed with Stan Sawa, I will call on Monday to arrange to meet with you and Stan to go over our submittal. Very truly yours, SUNRI COMPANY ? ^ - / sv Phillip K. Smith, Jr. Vice President Assistant to the President PKSgg Encls