Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout158C KERNON OSTERI DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES DECEMBER 8, 1981 2. CASE NO: 227 MF - IRONWOOD COUNTRY CLUB Mr. Smith reviewed the case indicating that the major addition would be the installation of a canopy roof extending across the full width of the two driveways. Mr. Frank Urrutia of Wexler-Urrutia was present on behalf of Ironwood Country Club. He indicated that the material of the roof structure would be sandblasted and it will be 4'6" high and would extend 92 feet across. Even with the wider planter area in front of the security hut, each of the driveways will be a minimum of 20 feet wide. This will parking allow spacets willto pass through even provided adjacent t with another the driveways r in the driveway. A p for g security vehicles. On a motion by Phyllis Jackson seconded by Vern Barton, the Board granted preliminary approval of the new entrance design for Ironwood Country Club. 3. CASE NO: 159 C - KERNON OSTER Mr. Smith stated that the site plan submitted by the applicant was unacceptable and that Staff had prepared an alternate plan which was presented to the Board and recommended for approval. The applicant, Mr. Kernon Oster indicated that he felt the alternate plan presented by Staff was not acceptable because it did not provide enough floor area to make the development economically feasible. The Board reviewed both plans and it was the consensus that the plan and elevations submitted by the applicant were not acceptable and could not be approved. Staff indicated that an additional area may be added to the lot through a street vacation procedure. Upon hearing the Board's decision, Mr. Oster indicated that he was prepared to accept the plan as presented by Staff. Based on this agreement, the Board indicated it could grant approval of the concept for the parking scheme presented by Staff. On a motion by Phyllis Jackson, seconded by Ron Gregory, the Board granted approval in concept to the parking scheme presented by Staff. Motion carried unanimously 7-0. 3. CASE NO: 228 MF - AL JOHNSON Mr. Bernie Leung asked to be excused at this time. Mr. Smith indicated that this was an application for preliminary approval of plans for the construction of two duplex dwelling units on the south side of Verba Santa, east of Highway 74, that the site plan as submitted complies with the setbacks required in the zoning ordinance. He added that the landscape plan is preliminary and needs some work. Mr. Gregory stated that the landscape plan should be refined and improved, especially considering the Scenic Highway designation for Highway 74. The applicant Mr. Al Johnson replied that his landscape plan conforms to the rest of the neighborhood. Mr. Al Cook stated that the Board is concerned that it be a good landscape plan because it is in the Scenic Preservation overlay area. The applicant replied that he would hire a Landscape Architect to improve the plan. On a motion by Vern Barton, seconded by Jackson, the Board approved the preliminary plans subject to the conditions included in the staff report. Motion carried 6-0-1 (Bernie Leung abstaining). - 2 - AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-2 DATE: December 8, 1981 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO: 158 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): KERNON OSTER, P.O. Box 956, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a one story commercial building. LOCATION: Northwest corner of San Carlos and Highway 111. ZONE: C-1 DISri ISSION! Site Plan: The applicant has submitted several proposed site plans for the development of the site. Staff has developed what it feels is the best site layout considering the constraints imposed on the lot due to its shape. The applicant met with Staff and did not object to the Staff proposed layout. The layout being recommended for approval proposes a 2,500 square foot building located adjacent to Palm Desert Drive. The parking area is located to the rear of the building with one-way access from San Carlos. A single lane driveway provides access to the parking spaces set at 450. The driveway exits onto an alley at the north side of the lot. An existing power pole located in the alley, will according to code, have to be removed and the power lines undergrounded. This will make the alley usable for the purpose of the applicant. The plan as recommended complies with the Municipal Code with the exception of the setback from Palm Deset Drive. An application for an adjutment has been filed. Building Elevations: The building elevations submitted are not appropriate for the site plan being recommended. If the site plan is given preliminary approval, then the applicant can approach an architect with a view to preparing detailed plans. The site is in the AO-1 flood zone. In view of the uncertainty of the site plan, flood approval has not yet been received, but will be required prior to working drawings being approved. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board review the proposed site plan and if it is deemed acceptable, then it could be given preliminary approval subject to the following conditions: 1. That the alley adjacent to the north of the property be improved (paved) to satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 2. That the existing power pole located in the alley to the north of the property be removed and the power lines undergrounded pursuant to Municipal Code requirements. 3. That the landscaping plans and elevations for the proposed building be submitted to the Design Review Board for preliminary approval when available. 4. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. CASE NO: 158 C DECEMBER 8, 1981 /pa PAGE TWO 5. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 6. Prior to submission of final working drawings applicant shall obtain Public Works approval for prevention of flood damage. 7. Applicant shall obtain an adjustment for setbacks, prior to submission of working drawings. 8. Provide a 3 foot high decorative masonry wall to screen parking from San Carlos; wall to extend a minimum of 20 feet adjacent to the alley from San Carlos. 9. Applicant shall install sidewalks as required by the Director of Public Works. '1LMQz`�M'k=QU�1 29Urs6mS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION Kernon H. Oster Applicant (please urines Box 956 Mailing Address State REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) To construct a one story store building. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 13 of Palm Village Plaza Tract ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO.' 627152012-2 EXISTING ZONING r._ 1 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** 346-1589 Telephone Property Owner Authorizotion THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER IS) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS AP LIGATION.--- 41�U DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY 9 PALM DESERT CIF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS, I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- �RICTIO AT MAY SE PPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. DATE l 1 .The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. DEPARTMENT APPLICATION OF ENVIRON- MENTAL SERVICES STAFF DESIGN PLANNING REVIEW i COMMISSION BOARD (APPROVES OR (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT) INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS PROCESSING SCHEDULE: s DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND (�CONSTRL SAFETY L ION SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. STAFF USE ONLY: Date Received Date of ACTOR Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED Staff ORB P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 Design Review Of: WT buil CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS CASE NO. Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed as requir b Municipal Code. 11-23-81 ature Date Department of Environmental Services Form 1 7 T- Pi "61 IV T:, L-k-j Uj Qj < oe r4l 77 41- to�i";t•',y - 40&� L21