Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout163C JP CONSTRUCTION INC4 BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT CITY OF PALM DESERT PROJECT STATUS REPORT ADDRESS E t t^ / APN. "I ",A'o DA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT: DATE RECEIVED Disapproved for permit issuance at this time. Reasons for disapproval: Signed tf Date ❑ Released for permit issuance: Signed Date ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: DATERECEIVED _/�� Disapproved for permit issuance at this time. Reasons for disapproval: Signed Date leased for permit issuance: signed Date FIRE DEPARTMENT: DATE RECEIVED ❑ Disapproved for permit issuance at this time. Reasons for disapproval: Signed ❑ Released for permit issuance: Signed CODEENFORCEMENT: DATE RECEIVED ❑ Disapproved for permit issuance at this time. Reasons for disapproval: ❑ Released for permit issuance: HEALTH DEPARTMENT Approved INTER -DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Signed Signed DATE RECEIVED Permit Issued Date ENVIRONMENTAL COPY POST OFFICE BOX 1977, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 July 15, 1983 J.P. Construction, Inc. Svend A.V. Peulicke 74-831 Velie Way,.Ste. 1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 Re: Case No. 163 C Dear Mr. Peulicke: Regarding your extension request dated July 5, 1983, this is to inform you that no extension is necessary for Phase II. Once construction has been implemented for a portion of the project, the approval for the balance of the project is valid indefinitely. Should you need any further information, feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, l•��(MI�- Stan B. Sawa Principal Planner cc: Clifford Swanson 5""WAFFLE-CRETE PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL BUILDINGS AND SPECIALTIES PATENT NO. 4,181,286 July 5, 1983 Mr. Ramon A. Diaz Director of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Dear Mr. Diaz: 111 U plVIR.ONMENIAL SLI--u S , -i t OF PAL-M DESERT On behalf of our client, Mr. Clifford Swanson, we hereby request that you process a one year extension of the planning approval for phase 1I of the project, as approved by Case # 163C. Should you have any questions on the above request, or need further information please do not hesitate to call me at the number listed below. SP/ns Very truly yours, Svend A.V. Peulicke Vice President cc: Mr. Clifford Swanson 43409 Lacovia Drive Bermuda Dunes, CA 92201 JP J.P. CONSTRUCTION INC. 74-831 VELIE WAY • SUITE 1 • PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA • 92260 • (619) 568-5973 fl+7 J, Q CAPJS-TrwG'T(cw rA4j6c,,cca(o /Ar-W F*-& (.4Z) 5+16s7iTJ'CE staacE 7rtEE �.-64stut& ask, ISdjj) lO�. fvW /Wt+tA '4IT'oAj (aw.) jW(-u—T�e�ra tac G$tlwr off 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION CASE NO: 163 C APPLICANT: J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC. 74-831 Velie Way, Suite 1, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT: Final approval of plans for a multi -tenant office/warehouse building. LOCATION: Cook Street Industrial Park, east of Cook Street. ZONE: S.I. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the Staff and by the applicant, the Design Review Board approved this project, subject to evidence of the easement being recorded and the landscape plans being revised as listed on the revised landscape plan on file with the City. Date of Action: Vote: April 27, 1982 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: See attached minutes. MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY APRIL 27, 1982 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. The meeting was called to order at 1:55 p.m. after a 55 minute study session. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Vern Barton Ron Gregory Rick Holden Phyllis Jackson Charlie Martin Bernie Leung Al Cook Ramon A. Diaz , Stan Sawa Steve Smith Patricia Armitage On a motion by Mr. Holden seconded by Mr. Gregory, the Minutes of the April 13, 1982, meeting were approved as written. Motion carried 4-0 (Ms. Jackson arrived after the Minutes were voted on). II. Case found acceptable at the study session and approved by minute motion: CASE NO: 724 SA Applicant/Address: STRAW HAT PIZZA, 73-165 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260 and AD FACTS SIGNS, P.O. Box 8110, Sacramento, CA 95818. Nature of Project/Approval Sought: Approval of 2 20" x 13' single faced interior illuminated signs. Location: 73-165 Highway 111, Palm Desert Zone: C-1 S.P. Mr. Smith indicated that the applicant was replacing the signs in order to get more visibility. The Board was in agreement that the signs were acceptable. On a motion by Mr. Barton, seconded by Mr. Gregory, the Board approved the signs. III. CASES: CASE NO: 163 C Applicant/Address: J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC., 74-831 Velie Way, Suite 1, Palm Desert, CA 92260. Nature of Project/Approval Sought: Final approval of plans for a multi -tenant office/warehouse building. Location: Cook Street Industrial Park, east of Cook Street. Zone: S.I. Mr. Smith indicated that the applicant had received preliminary approval of the plans at the February 9, 1982, meeting and that the final plans have addressed most of the concerns the Board had with the exception of the mutual access agreement, sign program issues and landscaping. -1- r DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES APRIL , 1982 CASE NO. 163 C (CONTINUED) Mr. Gregory felt the original landscape plan turned in, had a more attractive parkway layout than the one being presented. He felt it would be better to go with a modified version of the original . He also indicated that the planters in the parking lot could have Evergreen Ash trees which would provide shade. No groundcover was shown under the Palms. A standard overhead spray type of irrigation is preferable to the proposed drip irrigation system. Mr. Gregory suggested more planting be provided in the front of the building. Also the Stockes Holly planted four or five feet apart would take too long to fill in. Mr. Frank Koenon, applicant, stated that the original landscape plan was overdone so he tried to simplify it to conform with the Board's requirements. Mr. Gregory responded that this is why he would recommend a modified version of the original plan. Mr. Sven Peulique indicated they have had problems with the landscaping due to the blowsand in the area. Mr. Koenon indicated that he had been through three different landscape people so far, but that he would do whatever the Board would recommend. Mr. Gregory indicated that he would mark the plans with the recommended revisions. Mr. Diaz stated that he would need evidence that a mutual access agreement has been recorded. Mr. Koenon indicated that he had talked to the other owners regarding the common easement and he would have a letter drawn up by the end of next week. On a motion by Mr. Gregory, seconded by Mr. Holden, the final plans were approved subject to evidence of the easement being recorded and the landscape plans being revised as listed on the revised landscape plan on file with the City. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. CASE NO. 168C Applicant/Address: RENAISSANCE LAND COMPANY, 72-231 Johnson Drive, Indio, CA 92201. Nature of Project/Approval Sought: Application for final approval of working drawings for a 2,100 square foot radio station facility. Location: Southeast corner of Park View and Acacia Drive. Zone: R-1, 12,000 Mr. Diaz asked if the Board would be willing to look at the final drawings for this case at the present time even though it was not listed on the agenda. He added that the preliminary plans had been submitted and approved by the Planning Commission at its April 20th meeting. - 2 - AGENDA ITEM NO: III-A-2 DATE: April 27, 1982 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO: 163C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC., 74-831 Velie Way, Suite 1, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a multi -tenant of building. LOCATION: Cook Street Industrial Park, east of Cook Street. ZONE: S.I. DISCUSSION: The applicant received preliminary approval from the Board February 9, 1982. A copy of the February 9, 1982, staff report and Board minutes are attached. The final plans have addressed most of the concerns of the Board. TRASH BINS AND LANDSCAPING: The proposed trash bins and the landscaping plan have been revised. The Board should review the revised plans to determine acceptability. MUTUAL ACCESS EASEMENT AGREEMENT: Condition 3 of the February 9, 1982, staff report indicated that staff required the execution of a mutual access easement agreement to guarantee access from one lot to the other in perpetuity. No evidence of this agreement has been submitted at this time. SIGNS: The preliminary plans delineated a proposed sign program. The final plans have no signs indicated. The signs could be reviewed later, however, an overall program for the units would be helpful for future tenants. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Board should review the revised final plans and determine acceptability. Should the Board feel the final plans are acceptable, Staff would have no objection to the plans being given final approval provided the mutual access agreement and sign program issues are satisfactorily addressed. AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-2 DATE: February 9, 1982 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO: 163 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC., 74-831 Velie Way, Suite 1, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a multi - tenant office/warehouse building. LOCATION: Cook Street Industrial Park, east of Cook Street. ZONE: S.I. SITE PLAN: This application involves the construction of two multi -tenant industrial buildings within the Cook Street Industrial Park. Each building will be on its own lot, however, the main i Iaccess point from Green Way is a shared driveway access. Necessary mutual access easement agreements should be executed to guarantee the shared access in perpetuity. The layout of each building provides for perimeter driveways around all sides of both buildings. Parking is located at one end of each building and accross the front of each building. Overhead roll up doors are available for each unit at the rear. The site plan as submitted is basically acceptable to Staff. LANDSCAPING: A perimeter landscaping strip 8 feet wide is proposed to be located on the parkway. Considering that the streets in this development are private, landscaping in this location is felt to be acceptable. Some landscape planter areas are proposed throughout the parking lot area. The submitted plan does not indicate the materials to be planted. This information can be delineated on the final plan approval. PARKiNGe Thirty-one parking spaces are proposed for each building. The Municipal Code prescribes a standard of one (1) parking space per 1,000 square feet of building. Each building will have some 15,000 square feet of floor area. The parking proposed is in conformity with Code provisions. ELEVATIONS: The proposed building will be one story in height. The front facing wall and the end walls facing the street will be painted broom finished concrete panels. The rear and inside end walls will be painted salt textured concrete panels. The window areas will be aluminum frame storefront glazing, accented on each side by white pilasters. Along the two sides of the building facing the street a brown wood beam facia is proposed along with a brown colored plywood soffit below. Above is a blue clay tile mansard roof. TRASH ENCLOSURE: A common trash area has been proposed at the mid -point of the rear driveway against the east property line. This location is quite a distance from the end units and in addition could pose a traffic hazard for vehicles using the rear area driveway. -1- DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM CASE NO: 163C FEBRUARY 9, 1982 TRASH ENCLOSURE (CONTINUED) Staff would suggest that a series of trash enclosures be provided across the rear of the building. One trash bin for every two units with appropriate enclosure screening should be required. LIGHTING• At this time a lighting plan has not been provided, however, when one is done, either for landscaping or parking areas, it should include coverage of the rear driveway areas. It is felt very important for security purposes that the rear driveway area be lighted. SIGNS: The plans submitted indicate that individual unit signs are proposed on the wall adjacent to the entry. These signs are to be sandblasted wood or painted. (6' long x 1114" high). The Board should determine whether a sign program of this nature is acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: That application 163C, J.P. Construction, Inc., be granted preliminary approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping,_grading, lighting (as discussed in the February 9, 1982, report), amenities, trash storage (as discussed in the February 9, 1982, report), walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. That the applicant execute the appropriate mutual access easement agreements to guarantee the access from one lot to the other in perpetuity. /pa - 2 - MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY FEBRUARY 9, 1982 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS I. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m., after a 1 hour study session. II. MEMBERS PRESENT: Al Cook Ron Gregory Rick Holden Phyllis Jackson Bernie Leung Charles Martin MEMBERS ABSENT: Vern Barton (Excused Absence) STAFF PRESENT: Ramon A. Diaz Stan Sawa Steve Smith Patricia Armitage On a motion by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Holden, the minutes of the January 26, 1982, meeting were approved as amended to include the location being listed for all cases. Motion carried 4-0-2 (Martin and Leung abstaining). Minute motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session: None CASES: 1. CASE NO. 162C - STEVEN H. SULLIVAN, A.I.A., AND WHITE SHEET, INC. - Application for preliminary approval to remodel and construct a small addition to an existing commercial complex located at the northwest corner of north Frontage Road and Las Palmas. Mr. Sullivan was present. Mr. Smith reviewed this report and indicated that Staff's concern was over the location of the trash area. He stated that a solution would be to retain one trash enclosure and add one trash bin in the rear of the building. Mr. Sullivan said this would be acceptable to his client. Mr. Leung inquired as to the City's requirements for sidewalks. Mr. Diaz replied that public improvements are not required for remodeled buildings, but that the driveway they are removing would have to have a curb and gutter installed. The Board was in agreement that the proposed changes would be a definite improvement to the building. On a motion by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Holden, the preliminary approval was granted subject to the Conditions listed in the Staff report and with an added condition that a trash enclosure be added at the rear of the building in addition to the one in the front. Motion carried 6-0. 2. CASE NO. 163 C - J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC. - Application for preliminary approval of plans for a multi -tenant office/warehouse building located at Cook Street Industrial Park, east of Cook Street. Mr. Svend A. Peulicke, applicant was present. Mr. Smith summarized the staff report and indicated that one of the areas of concern was the location of the trash enclosure which had been proposed at the mid -point of the rear driveway against the east property line. Staff felt that this could pose a traffic hazard for vehicles using the rear area driveway and suggested that instead, a series of trash enclosures be provided across and against the rear of the building; that one trash bin for every two or three units with appropriate enclosures and screening should be provided. -1- ?SIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES :BRUARY 9, 1982 CASE NO. 163 C - J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC.(Continued) Mr. Peulicke felt that one trash bin for every two units would be too many. Staff also felt that when a lighting plan is provided, it should include coverage of the rear driveway areas for security purposes. Mr. Gregory indicated that the landscaping could be improved. He felt that the sidewalk could be pulled away from the building in order to leave enough room for a planting area for trees. On a motion by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Cook, the preliminary plans were approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report and subject to the working drawings being amended to show trash bins with appropriate enclosures and screening across and against the rear of the building and reconsideration of the landscape plan. Motion carried 6-0. 3. CASE NO. 231 MF - MIKE SUKO - Application for preliminary and final approval of plans for a four (4) unit apartment complex located on the north side of Royal Palm, 170 feet west of San Pablo. Mr. Suko, applicant and Mr. Wayne Ritchie, Building Designer were present. Mr. Smith indicated that this case had been continued from the meeting of January 26th, 1982, in order that the applicant could submit revised plans addressing Board's concerns with the elevations, solar protection and landscaping. For solar protection, Mr. Smith stated that the applicant had amended the plans to show a trellis over the sliding doors on the west side and awnings over the windows not covered by a trellis. Mr. Smith indicated that there had been some concern over the south elevation being improved. He stated that the applicant had added a mansard roof to the west end and provided the borders around the windows on the south facing wall. Regarding the landscaping, Mr. Gregory felt that a taller shrub should be used to soften the line between the building and the lawn. A five gallon shrub should be used instead of one gallon and a headerboard should be provided between the shrub and lawn area to make the maintenance easier. He felt the Eucalyptus trees could be 15 gallon size rather than 24" box and that the applicant should get the kind of Eucalyptus trees that branch out more. The Board was in agreement that the architectural design and the landscaping for this building should be improved before they could grant preliminary and final approval of the plans. Chairman Martin asked Mr. Diaz if each applicant receives the supplemental Design Review Board instructions when they apply. Mr. Diaz replied that they do. Mr. Diaz reminded the Board that they had granted grading and slab approval at the meeting of January 26th, 1982. The Board replied that the applicant should be permitted to proceed to the slab stage provided that the Building Department issues the necessary permit for work up to this point. Mr. Cook indicated that he wished to go on record that he felt the Design Review Board is not setting a precedent for grading and foundation approval without compelted Design approval. On a motion by Mr. Holden, seconded by Mr. Leung, this case was continued to the meeting of February 23, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 6-0. - 2 - G$nj� o:ff 1FDMz „M nDap=®nrc�v 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAU FORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: February 17, 1982 J.P. Construction, Inc. 74-831 Velie Way, Ste 1 Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO: 163 C 1 The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of February 16, 1982. APPROVED BY ADOPTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 783 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: CVWD File PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 783 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION AT ITS MEETING OF FEBRUARY 9, 1982. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did review the Design Review Board actions of February 9, 1982, approving: CASE NO. 162C - Preliminary approval to remodel and construct a small addition to an existing commercial complex located at the Northwest corner of north Frontage Road and Las Palmas for STEVEN H. SULLIVAN, A.I.A., and JAMES CHARLTON. CASE NO. 163 C - Preliminary approval of plans for a multi -tenant office/warehouse building located within the Cook Street Industrial Park, east of Cook Street for J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC. WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board action of February 9, 1982.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in these cases; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of February 9, 1982.. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 16th day of February, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, MILLER, WOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: KRYDER, RICHARDS . ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /pa 1 MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 1982 training facility for the Foundation for the Retarded of the Desert on approximately 7.5 acres in the "P" (Public Institution) zone located on the southeast corner of Country Club and Sagewood Drive, approximately 1300 feet east of Monterey Avenue. Mr. Sawa presented the staff report reviewing the location and points of accesses. He explained that the access from Country Club Drive is a proposed joint driveway with the adjacent property owner. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Wood asked if the adjacent property owner was in agreement with the proposed driveway. Mr. Sawa explained that if an agreement with the adjacent owner could not be reached the driveway would be appropriately modified. Chairman Miller opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. MR. GARY KNUDSON, 67950 Grandview Avenue, Cathedral City, concurred with the conditions and requested approval. He introduced Mr. Owen McCook. MR. OWEN MCCOOK, President of the Board of Directors for the Foundation, explained the various programs the Foundation for the Retarded has, and what type of facilities the proposed project would include. Chairman Miller asked if anyone wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this project. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adopt findings as recommended by staff. Carried unanimously 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 782, approving CUP 01-82 and 161 C. Carried unanimously 3-0. B. Case No. ZOA 02-82 - CITY OF PALM DESERT, Applicant Consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance relating to amusement arcades. Mr. Diaz reviewed the staff report and noted the amendment would clarify what constituted an amusement arcade, as well as add new restrictions for their operation. Because of concerns expressed by Commissioner Wood and the absence of two Commissioners, it was felt that it might be preferable to continue this matter to the next meeting. Chairman Miller opened the public hearing. Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to continue this hearing to the meeting of March 2, 1982. Carried unanimously 3-0. VIR. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS Preliminary plan approvals by the Design Review Board at its meeting of February 9, 1982, requiring Planning Commission confirmation. A. Case No. 162 C - STEVEN H. SULLIVAN, AIA, AND JAMES CHARLTON c/o White Sheet - erenminary approval to remodel and construct a small addition to an existing commercial complex at the northwest corner of north Frontage Road and Las Palmas. B. Case No. 163 C - J.P. CONSTRUCTION INC. - Preliminary approval of plans for a multi -tenant office warehouse building at the Cook Street Industrial Park, east of Cook Street. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 16, 1982 Mr. Smith reviewed the plans and recommended approval. Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to approve the actions of the Board for the meeting of February 9, 1982, by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 783. Carried unanimously 3-0. IX. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS - NONE X. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - NONE XI. COMMENTS - NONE X11. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Commissioner Crites, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to adjourn the meeting at 2:47 P.M. ATTEST: GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman /lr -3- RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary 0 0 MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING TUESDAY FEBRUARY 9, 1982 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS .err***aa***�r-��r�r**tea«x�ar�r�r.-�r�r�r �r �r�r■*�r•**«�r�r�ra* I. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m., after a 1 hour study session. II. MEMBERS PRESENT: Al Cook Ron Gregory Rick Holden Phyllis Jackson Bernie Leung Charles Martin MEMBERS ABSENT: Vern Barton (Excused Absence) STAFF PRESENT: Ramon A. Diaz Stan Sawa Steve Smith Patricia Armitage On a motion by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Holden, the minutes of the January 26, 1982, meeting were approved as amended to include the location being listed for all cases. Motion carried 4-0-2 (Martin and Leung abstaining). Minute motion approving cases found acceptable at the study session: None CASES: 1. CASE NO. 162C - STEVEN H. SULLIVAN, A.I.A., AND WHITE SHEET, INC. - Application for preliminary approval to remodel and construct a small addition to an existing commercial complex located at the northwest corner of north Frontage Road and Las Palmas. Mr. Sullivan was present. Mr. Smith reviewed this report and indicated that Staff's concern was over the location of the trash area. He stated that a solution would be to retain one trash enclosure and add one trash bin in the rear of the building. Mr. Sullivan said this would be acceptable to his client. Mr. Leung inquired as to the City's requirements for sidewalks. Mr. Diaz replied that public improvements are not required for remodeled buildings, but that the driveway they are removing would have to have a curb and gutter installed. The Board was in agreement that the proposed changes would be a definite improvement to the building. On a motion by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Holden, the preliminary approval was granted subject to the Conditions listed in the Staff report and with an added condition that a trash enclosure be added at the rear of the building in addition to the one in the front. Motion carried 6-0. 2. CASE NO. 163 C - J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC. - Application for preliminary approval of plans for a multi -tenant office/warehouse building located at Cook Street Industrial Park, east of Cook Street. Mr. Svend A. Peulicke, applicant was present. Mr. Smith summarized the staff report and indicated that one of the areas of concern was the location of the trash enclosure which had been proposed at the mid -point of the rear driveway against the east property line. Staff felt that this could pose a traffic hazard for vehicles using the rear area driveway and suggested that instead, a series of trash enclosures be provided across and against the rear of the building; that one trash bin for every two or three units with appropriate enclosures and screening should be provided. -1- ar ESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES -BRUARY 9, 1982 CASE NO. 163 C - J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC.(Continued) Mr. Peulicke felt that one trash bin for every two units would be too many. Staff also felt that when a lighting plan is provided, it should include coverage of the rear driveway areas for security purposes. Mr. Gregory indicated that the landscaping could be improved. He felt that the sidewalk could be pulled away from the building in order to leave enough room for a planting area for trees. On a motion by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Cook, the preliminary plans were approved subject to the conditions listed in the staff report and subject to the working drawings being amended to show trash bins with appropriate enclosures and screening across and against the rear of the building and reconsideration of the landscape plan. Motion carried 6-0. 3. CASE NO. 231 MF - MIKE SUKO - Application for preliminary and final approval of plans for a four 4) unit apartment complex located on the north side of Royal Palm, 170 feet west of San Pablo. Mr. Suko, applicant and Mr. Wayne Ritchie, Building Designer were present. Mr. Smith indicated that this case had been continued from the meeting of January 26th, 1982, in order that the applicant could submit revised plans addressing Board's concerns with the elevations, solar protection and landscaping. For solar protection, Mr. Smith stated that the applicant had amended the plans to show a trellis over the sliding doors on the west side and awnings over the windows not covered by a trellis. Mr. Smith indicated that there had been some concern over the south elevation being improved. He stated that the applicant had added a mansard roof to the west end and provided the borders around the windows on the south facing wall. Regarding the landscaping, Mr. Gregory felt that a taller shrub should be used to soften the line between the building and the lawn. A five gallon shrub should be used instead of one gallon and a headerboard should be provided between the shrub and lawn area to make the maintenance easier. He felt the Eucalyptus trees could be 15 gallon size rather than 24" box and that the applicant should get the kind of Eucalyptus trees that branch out more. The Board was in agreement that the architectural design and the landscaping for this building should be improved before they could grant preliminary and final approval of the plans. Chairman Martin asked Mr. Diaz if each applicant receives the supplemental Design Review Board instructions when they apply. Mr. Diaz replied that they do. Mr. Diaz reminded the Board that they had granted grading and slab approval at the meeting of January 26th, 1982. The Board replied that the applicant should be permitted to proceed to the slab stage provided that the Building Department issues the necessary permit for work up to this point. Mr. Cook indicated that he wished to go on record that he felt the Design Review Board is not setting a precedent for grading and foundation approval without compelted Design approval. On a motion by Mr. Holden, seconded by Mr. Leung, this case was continued to the meeting of February 23, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 6-0. -2- AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-2 DATE: February 9, 1992 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO: 163 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC., 74-831 Velie Way, Suite 1, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a multi - tenant office/warehouse building. LOCATION: Cook Street Industrial Park, east of Cook Street. ZONE: S.I. SITE PLAN: This application involves the construction of two multi -tenant industrial buildings within the Cook Street Industrial Park. Each building will be on its own lot, however, the main access point from Green Way is a shared driveway access. Necessary mutual access easement agreements should be executed to guarantee the shared access in perpetuity. The layout of each building provides for perimeter driveways around all sides of both buildings. Parking is located at one end of each building and accross the front of each building. Overhead roll up doors are available for each unit at the rear. The site plan as submitted is basically acceptable to Staff. LANDSCAPING: A perimeter landscaping strip 8 feet wide is proposed to be located on the parkway. Considering that the streets in this development are private, landscaping in this location is felt to be acceptable. Some landscape planter areas are proposed throughout the parking lot area. The submitted plan does not indicate the materials to be planted. This information can be delineated on the final plan approval. PARKING: Thirty-one parking spaces are proposed for each building. The Municipal Code prescribes a standard of one (1) parking space per 1,000 square feet of building. Each building will have some 15,000 square feet of floor area. The parking proposed is in conformity with Code provisions. ELEVATIONS: The proposed building will be one story in height. The front facing wall and the end walls facing the street will be painted broom finished concrete panels. The rear and inside end walls will be painted salt textured concrete panels. The window areas will be aluminum frame storefront glazing, accented on each side by white pilasters. Along the two sides of the building facing the street a brown wood beam facia is proposed along with a brown colored plywood soffit below. Above is a blue clay tile mansard roof. TRASH ENCLOSURE: A common trash area has been proposed at the mid -point of the rear driveway against the east property line. This location is quite a distance from the end units and in addition could pose a traffic hazard for vehicles using the rear area driveway. -1- M DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA ITEM CASE NO: 163C FEBRUARY 9, 1982 TRASH ENCLOSURE (CONTINUED) Staff would suggest that a series of trash enclosures be provided across the rear of the building. One trash bin for every two units with appropriate enclosure screening should be required. LIGHTING: At this time a lighting plan has not been provided, however, when one is done, either for landscaping or parking areas, it should include coverage of the rear driveway areas. It is felt very important for security purposes that the rear driveway area be lighted. SIGNS: The plans submitted indicate that individual unit signs are proposed on the wall adjacent to the entry. These signs are to be sandblasted wood or painted. (6' long x 1114" high). The Board should determine whether a sign program of this nature is acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: That application 163C, J.P. Construction, Inc., be granted preliminary approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting (as discussed in the February 9, 1982, report), amenities, trash storage (as discussed in the February 9, 1982, report), walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. That the applicant execute the appropriate mutual access easement agreements to guarantee the access from one lot to the other in perpetuity. /pa - 2 - I i Ip 9 PD Dt � Ir ca 1 ¢ A t II� � IOW Via. E$ f yi o 6ppe 4 ,Y' v �G v- _ H A'D f o. i a. a w., 69TCr BnMUI`L I RO93LLL — PHILLIP G KCGNGN TRUST vo. eoP caw AKM oaaAmr CK!RMu.� exam MowA' trU ecsaau J. P. Cau motion Ine� 71I-5W5973 f f N011V/�B—IS 1SSM — b.n.:rb u�rnd.sa+0 .waN wrn. 'wwvieaw . seal.. PTIM" Io NOUWAa-IS H1tlON NOUMAEM9 1SV 3 IA v �o -�,NAYFA2_ JR/ VE _ I I I @ n Y _ o .. k CTRESN NAY I I�IIA &„oGr IP A n Pa i 7 e P�y a - omus�ou.. wn.sz rLLm: J. P. OOIIt`WCI1OII 7p i RU93G aiL1UGl — PHiI_iP G KOGNGN TRUST /A OOx Oe00 I14N G��Gr Ceu�ww.� tll]ie 'W 1Mi v�Ar � Maws hiN >OnoW II ur�d'ti'we� V C/ 711.58&5977 CITY OF HALM DESERT MARKET RECEW 5617 RECEIVED OF: T cet t5 /r," l Cih DATE Zao"A MOUNNT 45 a 'QPZ FOR CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE Samuel I. Russell & Philip E. Koenan Trust PO Box 2056 Palm Desert, California 92260 Samuel I. Russell & Philip E. Koenen Trust PO Box 2056 Palm Desert, California 92260 J. P. Construction, Inc. 74-831 Velie Way Palm Desert, California 92260 J. P. Construction, Inc. 74-831 Velie Way Palm Desert, California 92260 YOO LSUtiR9 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION J. P. Construction. Inc. Applicant ( please pnnt) 74-811 Velie Was Suite 1 568-5973 Mailing Address Telephone Palm Desert, California 92260 City State Zip -Code m REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) Planningapproval for Multi Tenant Off ce/Warehouse Building in Cook Street Business Park PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Parcel # 2 of Parcel Man # 18142 in the City of Palm Desert ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING S-1 Property Owner Authorization THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER (S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION. ! 1-26-82 DATE AGREEMENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE _TM§ -CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRI0R101,60 AT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. Applicants Signature Svend A.V. PeuliM ' (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS O MINISTERIAL ACT n CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER E.A. No. ACCEPTED BY CASE No. REFERENCE CASE NO. 1-26-82 DATE 1-26-82 DATE 70 ' Id The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City -of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. DEPARTMENT DESIGN PLANNING APPLICATION OF ENVIRON- REVIEW COMMISSION MENTAL BOARD (APPROVES OR SERVICES DENIES PROJECT) STAFF (ADVISORY) INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS PROCESSING SCHEDULE: DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND bION CONSTRUC SAFETY SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. STAFF USE ONLY: Date Received Date of ACTOR "Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIED Staff DRB P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form 1 r-4 CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review Of: CASE NO. Office/Warehouse Buildi ype o Project J. P. Construction, Inc. Samuel I Russell & Philip E. Koenan Trust, Owners Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed as re uired by Municipal Code. St<nature Date Department of Environmental Services Form 1 SAMUEL I RUSSELL & PHILIP E. KOENAN TRUST PO BOX 2056 PALg DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 SPONSOR J. P. CONSTRUCTION, INC. 74-831 VELIE WAY PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 F c C m m --� J. Pe Construct' °s Inc. y z m industr-A building for Lip Nit,31W77 z Samuel i. Russell - Phillip E. Koenen Trust �e 9� ��-ear i®ln� vt��' Palm Desert California 92260 a �+ m o P.i�. box Z056, Paltr, Desert. CaliWA 92260 7 p phone phone (14) 568-0351 # 714- 9 -5973 z 0 A I O 0 g y 09ZZ6 elwo111e0 Uesed wled AeM 8118A LEB-VL �.i��./py oP �Z�G C'IN7Jo� %'�07� XO9 'C a Z ti 66 iD _ LLOOIC ON DI, l�nr N�f��o>I din ,i�� — ,-��ssn i nanwds wQ Z� W x -ouo uo'lonalsuoD -d -r rood rJNiC] In d1-z�15nC7fll _. Q m w LL Fi ow zU- Q ctl � r--- ---- - - v i Q ul (fi � f- �; z O IL �d rC �9 i;9 Lz Ej C =o t e C) pV U C_ L r� ©oC1 I J •r ua V J i':.1 Irk cj c;, U— to z 0 Q W W T) LH i