Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout164C SAGEWOOD PLAZA_ ... ., .. �. 'h'I�' 11Y � ~ ♦ s z --_- _ = y -,.�#�. ll* .. rr.- _ -� / i �� � .. � .� �'__'*- AGENDA ITEM NO. III-B-2 DATE: April 10, 1990 ARCHIITECiURAL REVIEW OC1,1MISSICN CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMET CORP., 555 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92264. NATURE OF PIKOECr/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for 5403 square foot camiercial building. LOCATION: Pad D at east end of Plaza de Monterey shopping center - Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: PC (2) DTSr7NsTrw- The request is for preliminary approval of a building on the last remaining pad at Plaza de Monterey. The parking for this building was installed previously. The building architecture will match that of the other existing buildings in the center as will the sign program. A preliminary landscape Plan indicates that additional Planting will acc ompany this request. RE00MMESIDATICN• That oc miission review Case No. 164 C, building pad 'D' and grant preliminary approval. Prepared by: P� ,c__ SRS/tm r Cc0 71Y OF R H DESER)l u 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. 92200 SIGN PROGIRAM -UPQ-JC1%'MH ''CAN: Dept.of Planning and Community Development Sign Maker / Contractor SIGN REQUEST ( Describe type and purpose of the sign(s)). ESTIMATED VALUE OF SIGN (S) $1;;,9Q .SLU SIGN LOCATION ( Street apprises, suite no., building/ project name, ar location In rotation to streets I. 60 ( - 4 elephone �iZZ l n Ztp-Coae Telepnone - :k—rot i ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING FroperTy Owner Authorization. The undersigned states that they are the awner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give authorizatior the filing of this application. Signature Date Landlord of Building The undersigned states that they are the landlord of The building for which the sign (s) is for, and hereby give cult action and approval for the filing of this application. If same as aaove, sign in both pieces. iem aosolvmg the CITY OF PALM DESERT of oil Ilcbllltlpa relate to any d restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT 1Absolve the Cit of Im qd art of all liabilities regarding any dead restrictions / l may ba appli o thy(terty described herein. Signature Dote (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ACCEPTED BY: ❑ STAFF REVIEW IN CAVE 2 n Qa ate ❑ 4d 1� Ntc EXHIBIT "E" SIGN CRITERIA for PLAZA DE MONTEREY This criteria has been established for the purpose of assuring an outstanding shopping center, and for the mutual benefit of all tenants. Conformance will be strictly enforced, and installed nonconforming or unapproved signs wIII not be allowed. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. All permits for signs and installation shall be obtained by tenant or sign representative. 2. All signs shall be constructed and installed at tenants expense. 3. Tenant shall be responsible for the fulfilment of all requirements of this criteria and shall submit samples of sign material if need be. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS: 1. No animated, flashing or audible signs will be permitted. 2. No exposed lamps or tubing will be permitted. 3. All signs shall comply with all local building codes. TYPE OF SIGNS PERMITTED: 1. 13" CHANNEL LETTERS on raceway except on building E, which will be 8" CHANNEL LETTERS flush to stucco fascia, illumination neon. STYLE: HELVETICA ITALIC, 15% slant COLOR: BUILDINGS A, B, AND C: IVORY BUILDING E: BLUE MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS: 1. If tenant has a non —custom door for receiving merchandise, it may have uniformly applied on said door in location, as directed by the project manager in 2" high block letters, the tenant's name and address. Color of letters will be selected by the project manager. 2. Window signs painted or die cut vinyl, letters will be limited to one window, size not to exceed three (3) square feet. 3. Pedestrian sign will be double face sandblasted sign on eye hooks. Color: White letters and border with dark brown background. Size: 18" x 36" - ITEM- -TI I I I I"Ian % . ss Dept. of Planning and Community Development C ONV Oq MUM o 0 0 n 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 e REOUESTt (Describe specific nature of approval requested ). ✓4, C _ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. Telephone r^ EXISTING ZONING Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states that they are the owner (s) of the property described herein and hereby give author- ization for the filing of this application. ement aosoiv 1 DO BY MY n or rmim uesert of an noonsties relative to any deed restrictions. RE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve Me City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. Signature Date Applicant's Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status. ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption ❑ Negative Declaration Cl Other ll,l., 99,1 /G*�� Date Accepted by: C/i-ASIE H00, Reference Cos* No. please print) _ r0N Dept. of Planning and Community Development MW off MOE@ o 0 0 n 73.510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 tale t (Describe specific nature of approval requested ). PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING C % 3 40- Nq o Telephone g 2260 Owner Authorization The undersigned states that they are the owner Is) of the property described herein and hereby give author izatlon for the filing of this application. Signature Date Agreement absolving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. Applicants Signature 1 to ,4j.VG Signature F USE ONLY) Environmental Wtus Inistertal Act E.A. No. `egorical Exemption htivs Declaration tier Dote Oats Accepted by: CASE H00, (a f Reference Case No. South Coast Air Quality Management District Stationary Source Compliance ROY D. OLIVARES, JR. Air Quality Engineer II 73-510 Fred Waring Dr. Palm Deserl, CA 92260-2578 (619) 340-0697 9ovt�S ��-,�--��-1 ^Q�� �� u PLAZJ oE.moNTf-:RF-Y y I UENTFICATI M SIGN S K O KI C� i� waod w®Iscv U3Al.31 mj •s: os -s la3 f 4 0I v?4-"-d 3S'dmd.&1191 Jo VV3A Sao .103 llyms POUMtsaoa f � iJ�`J A9 eta 3; �El > [] :AS C13AOaddb X .r i .6,0i i %arDr.. Palm Oasart, Ca. 92260 _ SIGIN PROGSIRAM APPU=`i10N PCIR[d: Dept.of Planning and Community Development print Sign Maker / Controcior SIGN REQUEST ( Describe type and purpose of the sign(a)J. f _Y /r it I : _ . N� . _.i r _ ESTIMATED VALUE OF SIGN (S) $ 2S;�Cv SIGN LOCATION ( Street address, suite no., building/project nonls, ar location In rNatlon to streets 1. ASSESSORS PARCEL EXISTING ZONING U — e U none Zip -Code Telephone Property Owner Authorization: The urdsrs'gneC stctes that they are the owner(&) of the property described harem anQ hweoy give outhorzatm the filing Of this Oponcahon Signature Data Landlord of Building The undersigned stores that they are me landlord of the building for which the sign (s) is for, and hersoy gm out nation Ono approval for the filing of this application. If same as above, sign in born places. Signature Da • Agreement abs Wing ins CITY OF PALM OESERT of all liabilities relative to any dead restrictions. I DO By My SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the Cry of Palm Desert of all Iwbiuties r,gorling any dead restnctiom may D. applicable to me property desaibed herain MOOg lS'OG � ,f J1 J J� tJ ALL"J J JSJ 73-510 Fred Waring Dr., Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 1611C - SIGN PROGRAM' APPLJQa700H fO(AdN: Dept.of Planning and Community Development T'en/i f` please print) "'r Slate Sign Maker / Contractor SIGN REQUEST ( Describe type and purpose of the sign(s)). In ESTIMATED VALUE OF SIGN (S) $ _ 46 07 a SIGN LOCATION ( Street address, suite no., building/ project name, or location In rotation to streets I. Pied Ed to ' .a ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING Telepnone Zip -A Teleonone rraperty Uwner Authorization: The undersigned States that they are the owner(s) of the property described herein and hereby give authorization the filing of this application. Signature Date Landlord of Building The undersigned states that they Ore the landlo oi'the building for which the sign is tor, on hereby give CUM ization a(s1nd approval for the filing of this a pllcafIon, -wme as coove, sign in bdttfpl• M. Signature „V ,e D T;;»1 D'are Agreement absolving the CITY OF PALM DESERT of all liabilities relative to any deed restrictions. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Ralm Desert of an iiabit, ties 'reTa-731R4"any dead restrictions AA11 A may be applicable to the property described herein. to Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ❑ STAFF REVIEW Date ACCEPTED BY: W± i CASE Hod Uate REFERENCE CASE NO. bmaa,.a•rnL szavCa/ In.s.,vu 'o 5 1{Y1DE Inc.I_ALA any C. Di ircNw SgrMD. unc.lWt WIA GLLNO11M 6T. 101%yi 1M6 INdO. C�LIFORN4 DE301 YS116D QDNTmAcTO11�5/uc,w,, Lo / 1 JYI r. 11G c y�� AL m ptsf _I� 1 �' D AWN DY MAF DEBCRIFi1 L�,� V Ut✓i. GNAI IHE% LTlzs it �. �..' Onmw unpun,.MO O,.n�na. NND IMPERIUL510X^Ill.'ub'lIAL D,OI.cI Glrq pinM lq i0u Dy 1MOERI/�L SIGN II I. nO1100 .XO.n 10-,—W1 ay.nwlwn, nM 1. ONN. wpW aNMW1N In MEMBE 1EU' Cf �-�R4R "LOc.TIDN OMWINO NO' I Cif LN:.NO. UJ I�I0I AA.r�nf' � �� 3 CVSTOMEWFIRM dWE86rt %pRMMANE CAMP.NO. nQ /� 4287I9 Lp CVEiOME�a YF_FINK WFIRM NAMEnA CWTOMER RMIIWK NNONE WTE TL/ /Cfp Ul Ef.LLE 11—, 1 11 lT STormfPair PzyATIoH Har Es; I. FAGE(5)—p�LLit: AG12`(LIG 2. TF-lm CAP- WtCy a. ieETUr2NCs)- 1vogy 4. AI L SpEGS I H AGGot2bAHGE -ro pLA7A DE MoHTEIeEY STOW COTMIPc. Q MON-TL - IV IK. ; oc^lna ; W X wmDUIT pa &Ass sA.tiD ® 5HI ET ME 1AL © ACKYLIG fAGC &AX/SEC11 0H (INDVL. LPL) mo SLALL CITY CeW M aLL co " use W Irhab t: OP Y .. TKi3pin¢,, 3yR L. 11 A . •.� 1 D 9 •• 1 • 9. CASE NO.: PP 89-21 APPLICANT (AND AMRFSS): TOYS R US, 461 From Road, Paramus, New Jersey 07652 NATURE OF PROJECP/APPROVAL. SOUGHT: Approval of revised final landscape plans IDCATI(N: Highway 111 at Fred Waring Drive 7QNE: PC (3 ) Ms. Sass reported that this request was for preliminary approval noting that the applicant would have to cane back with a more detailed plan. She discussed commission's prior concerns. Applicant noted that the reason there were less trees on the revised plan was because if trees were planted as commission requested, it would block the signage. Commissioner Drury felt the commission needed to see all revisions done on one plan, as applicants arrived with two different set of revised plans. It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to continue the request directing applicant to oanbine the two plans addressing past A.R.C.'s 000erns. The conmission also directed applicant to address the folloaukg: 1) Shrubs proposed for parking lot area will not work. These plants will burn. 2) Planting should be provided throughout front of building Notion carried 5-0. 10. CASE NO.: 164 C APPLICANP ( AND AEORESS) : CARVER MAr� CORP., 555 So. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92264 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOLUH: Preluninary approval for 5403 square foot ccmTe=ial building LOCAAPICN: Pad D at east end of Plaza de Nonterey shopping center at Country ntry Club Drive and Monterey Avenue 7 r It 11 �. •'• 1 Dh 11 '/ •• 1 • ZONE: PC ( 2 ) Mr. Drell explained that this is on the last pad for Monterey Shopping Center noting that the site plan was approved in 1979 and amended with the Lucky's addition in 1985. Ccmnissioner Drury felt there was a horrendous parking problem at this center now. She thought a restudy of the entire parking area was needed correcting the internal congestion problem. She felt the city would be real remiss when they allow another building to be added into this center. Applicant noted that the building was 5,400 square feet which is smaller that what was originally approved. Mr. Drell suggested the commission ask the public works department to study the circulation recommending improvements on the parking lot congestion. It was moved by Commissioner Urrutia, seconded by Commissioner Connor, to grant preliminary approval directing applicant to address the following concerns: 1) Study internal circulation problem 2) Minimize hardscaping against the building Motion carried 4-1, Commissioner Drury opposing. 11. CASE NO.: PP 89-12 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GEORGE =SOVAS, Post Office Box 5132, Orange, CA 92667 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPRUVAL SOUGHT: Landscaping for commercial center LOCATION: 73-918 Highway 111 ZONE: C-1 Applicant discussed changes made on the revised landscape plans with commission. It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seed by Commissioner Connor, to approve the revised landscape plans as presented. Carried 5-0. 12. CASE ND.: 354 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GEORGE BUONO-MARK DEMILLE, c/o Ceramari, Post Office Box 12920, Palm Desert, CA 92255 E 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346.0611 April 12, 1 REVIEW CUNIISSIGN ACTION CASE NO.: 164 C APPLICANP (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGII ODRP., 555 So. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92264 NATURE OF PROJECF/APPROVAL SOUGffPreliminary approval for 5403 square foot camiercial building I=TICN: Pad D at east end of Plaza de Monterey shopping center at Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue ZONE: PC (2 ) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission granted preliminary approval directing applicant to address the following concerns: 1) Study internal circulation problem 2) Minimize hardscaping against the building Date of Action: April 10, 1990 Vote: Carried 4-1, Counissioner Drury opposing (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. ) STAFF 0OM4F11PS: It is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. 03NPINUED CASES: In order to be placed on the next meetings agenda, new or revised plans must be submitted no later than 9:00 a.m. the Monday prior to the next meeting. Ij U4/sas iEnazdde A-z�Taxd OueSE pue ,Q, pad 6urpi?nq 'O %9T 'ON aseO Mamas uOTSSTW M }ay '4sanbas sTq Aediu000a TT?M 6u?queid isuo?Z?ppa qeq} sa;ao?pu? ueid edeospuei LxmxMTasd V 'mes6osd u6?s eta TTTm se seouao aq u? sBu?PT?nq &U4s?xe a8LaO 9LR JO }eq} LMem TT?M 8sc4084?gaxe &rEPT?nl 8LL 'dTsnO?nexd PeTTe}sull seM arrPT?nq STLr4 s0j: Bu?s[zad aqy 'd8ra4uOW eP ezeTd qe pad Bu?crMijea gseT eq} uO &rrPT?nq a 9:0 TEAoidde Axeu=-[ead sod s? gsenbes eq,L ( Z ) Od :ZN0'L 'anueAV A;Dra4LmW pue eAisQ gnTO k unoO - saq-uao BuTddogs Fara4uOW ap ezeid 3o pua gsee qe Q pad-NOI.LVOM BU?pT?nq TeTaxaunuoo q-009: asenbs £Ob9 sod Tenaxdda LlBuT urTasd :,rrr M WM&W/SOQCGUd aO 3aMVM ':V9ZZ6 YJ 'sbu?adS mTed 'OAT -TO uodueO mied ' s 999 ' ' daOO lgalgn'dP1iiW UaA2IFiJ : (SSHHaaV Gt) JMDI7ddV 066T SOT T?ady :RLVa Z-H-III 'ON LSLLI KOHIW O V9T :ON RSVD U •• - C A ml 1. 07R.M. -.r IT— T11 ,' mVimW Dept. of Planning and Community Development MV oQ pd0 a o 0 0 N 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 Architects l PiriPnfrnct/Hornwit7 R Associates Applicant I please print) 1833 Victory Boulevard 818 246-6050 Moiling Address Telephone Glendale, CA 91201 Clty State Zip -Code REQUEST! ( Dsscrtbe specific nature of approval requested I. Design review approval of new Bldg. 'D' in existing "Plaza De Monterey" Shopping Center �lCM Al ,i ni ( `mot C sae /) A/1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: � re e• er e e 1� a re • e• er r e in book 104 at page 19-23 of maps, records of Riverside County, State of California. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. #622033026-2 EXISTING ZONING PC-2 Owner 1 00 BY MY SIGNATURE ON Applicants Signature srsigned states that for the Nlim; of this ey Partners Li Nael Mati�-- are the owner ($) at the property described herein and hereby give author - Partnership r or an iiaonmes relative to any aced restrictions. AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions Partners the property described herein. FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Statu ❑ Ministerial Act E. , No. ❑ Categorical Exemption ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Accepted by CASE HOO Ref!rer^e Crse No. . Date l r • -. •lip •7. �• e Architectural Review Of: ... Rijilding. Case No. Leidenfrost/Horowitz = 3131 V ry Boulevard Gleindale CA 91304 (Applicant) Att: Noel Matic -------------------------------------------------------------- Agreement of of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Community Development. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Architectural Review Commission process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Camnmity Development. Any substantial change requires approval by the Architectural Commission. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, city and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy: Curb, gutter, curb cuts and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the city engineer. construction shall conform to city standards and all requirements of the city engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the ae property being developed as required MA t- I gi (Date) I r SIGN CRITERIA FOR PLAZA DE''MONTEREY This criteria has been established for the purpose of assuring an outstanding shopping center, and for the mutual benefit of all tenants. Conformance will be strictly enforced, and installed nonconforming or unapproved signs will not be allowed. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. All permits for signs and installation shall be obtained by tenant or sign representative. 2. All signs shall be constructed and installed at tenants expense. 3. Tenant shall be responsible for the fulfilment of all requirements of this criteria and shall submit samples of sign material if need be. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS: 1. No animated, flashing or audible signs will be permitted. 2. No exposed lamps or tubing will be permitted. 3. All signs shall comply with all local building codes. TYPE OF SIGNS PERMITTED: 1. 12" CHANNEL LETTERS on raceway except on building E, which will be 8" CHANNEL LETTERS flush to stucco fascia, illumination neon. STYLE: HELVETICA ITALIC, 15% slant COLOR: BUILDINGS A, B, AND C: IVORY BUILDING E: BLUE MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS: 1. If tenant has a non -custom door for receiving merchandise, it may have uniformly applied on said door in location, as directed by the project manager in 2" high block letters, the tenant's name and address. Color of letters will be selected by the project manager. 2. Window signs painted or die cut vinyl, letters will be limited to one window, size not to exceed three (3) square feet. 3. Pedestrian sign will be double face sandblasted sign on eye hooks. Color: White letters and border with dark brown background. Size: 18" x 36" i4 December 11. 1987 UTV oq GDQHU o o - &A 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORN]A 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C AMENDMENT APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER COMPANIES NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of chance to part of elevation and freestanding building. LOCATION: Southeast corner Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: PC2 Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant. the architectural commission approved this case by minute motion. Date of Action: December B. 1987 Vote: Carried 4-1 (Commissioner Sullivan opposed) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. Upon receiving final approval it is your responsibility to submit the plans approved by the architectural commission to the department of building and safety. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COHIIISSION TUESDAY - DECEMBER 8. 1987 1:00 P.H. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED HARING DRIVE 1. The meeting was called to order at 1:00 pm after a one hour study session. Commission Members Current Meetino_ Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Greaory. Chairman X 18 3 AI Cook. Alternate X 13 8 Mary Drury X 15 6 Russell McCrea X 20 1 Rick Holden X 20 1 Steve Sullivan X (as of 9/8/87) 7 0 Others Present: Steve Smith Catherine Sass Phil Drell Donna Gomez It was moved by Commissioner Sullivan, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to approve the minutes of November 24. 1987 as written. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Cook abstainina). 11. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 4-1 (Commissioner Sullivan opposed). 1. CASE NO: 164 C AMENDMENT APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER COMPANIES NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of change to part of elevation and freestanding buildind. LOCATION: Southeast corner Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: PC2 2. CASE NO: 337 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CHEVRON c/o TAIT AND ASSOCIATES, 900 Orangefair Lane. Anaheim, CA 92001. April 21, 1987 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., 555 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92264. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for 5100 square foot commercial building. LOCATION: Pad F at southwest corner of Plaza de Monterey shopping center - Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved this case by minute motion. Date of Action: April 14, 1987 Vote: Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION TUESDAY - APRIL 14, 1987 1:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE i i M i i i i i i i i M i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i I. The meeting was called to order at 1:00 pm after a one hour study session. Commission Members Current Meeting Year to Date Present Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory, Chairman X 6 1 Al Cook X 6 1 Mary Drury X 5 2 Russell McCrea X 7 0 Rick Holden, Alternate X 7 0 Staff Present: Ray Diaz Steve Smith Catherine Sass Ken Weller Donna Gomez It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to approve the minutes of March 24, 1987 as written. Carried 5-0 IT. Moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner McCrea to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 5-0 1. CASE NO: CUP 87-4 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TAKASHI 8 KAZUKO YAMAGUCHI, 73-391 Catalina Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of single family dwelling and second senior apartment unit. LOCATION: Northeast corner El Cortez and Santa Ynez. ZONE: R-I 2. CASE NO• 329 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, Box 3249 Terminal Annex, M.L. 731E, Los Angeles, CA 90051. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of replacement of two existing four foot dish antennae with two eight foot antennae. LOCATION: 75-095 Mayfair ZONE: SI MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION APRIL 14, 1987 3. CASE NO• APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROSE Z FASHIONS, 73-640 E1 Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260; PORTALS, 73-280 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: on existing awning. LOCATION: 73-640 El Paseo ZONE: C-1 4. CASE NO: 322 C Approval of new art work (sign) APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BAKERS SQUARE RESTAURANT, c/o LEIFER MARTER 8 DUNCAN ARCHITECTS, P.O. Box 1022, Santa Barbara, CA 93102-1022. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of landscape plan. LOCATION: 73-075 Highway Ill ZONE: C-1 Approval subject to the following conditions. 1. African shumak to be minimum 24" boxes. 2. The crape myrtle trees to be replaced with evergreen trees. 3. Ground cover to be replaced with more appropriate planting. 5. CASE NO: 306 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): AHMANSON DEVELOPMENT, 1001 Commerce Drive, Building E2, Irwindale, CA 91706. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of parking lot lighting plan. LOCATION: Northwest corner Town Center Way and Highway 111. ZONE: PC 3 Approval is for 28 foot high lighting fixtures. N MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION APRIL 14, 1987 6. CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., 555 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92264. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for 5100 square foot commercial building. LOCATION: Pad F at southwest corner of Plaza de Monterey shopping center - Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: Approval is for building without signage. III. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: 328 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BOB SIPOVAC, 73-415 Shadow Mountain J-1, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Remodel and expansion of restaurant formerly known as Peg Leg Inn. LOCATION: 73-098 Highway III ZONE• C-1 S.P. Mr. Smith explained that commission in study session reviewed the proposal and had concerns with the parking and the expansion of the facility. The applicant presented a colored drawing and explained that the proposed restaurant would be fast food Italian. They are proposing to enclose the existing patio structure to provide additional seating. Commissioner Drury asked if there was sufficient parking provided for the existing structure. Mr. Smith indicated there were no established parking spaces at this time and that 20 spaces would be required with the expansion of the building. Commissioner Holden suggested that they provide six full size parking spaces and six compact spaces. 3 AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-4 DATE: APRIL 14, 1987 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, 555 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92264. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval for 5040 square foot commercial building. LOCATION: Pad F at southwest corner of Plaza de Monterey shopping center - County Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: DISCUSSION: Project involves a 5040 square foot commercial building originally approved as a future addition to the center. The pad was approved for 5100 square feet. The buildings architecture although not identical, is compatible with the rest of the center. RECOMMENDATION• That the commission grant preliminary approval to Case No. 164 C. PD/dlg 10. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 February 10, 1986 Lucky Stores, Inc, 6565 Knott Avenue Buena Park. CA 90620 RE: BUILDING LIGHTING AT STORE AT 73-I01 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE Dear Gentlemen: Regarding your new supermarket under construction in Palm Desert at the above address, it has come to our attention that lighting is proposed on the rear elevation of the building. This exterior lighting was not noted on the preliminary plans approved by the architectural commission. Because of the adjacent residential properties and the concern they have shown throughout the approval and construction phases, review and approval of this lighting is necessary. Pursuant to municipal code section 25.56.470 (see attachment), we would ask that you submit information on the fixtures (type, style, size, wattage, etc.) to this department prior to their installation. Staff's concern is that there be no light spill over and that the light source not glare onto the adjacent residential properties. Your cooperation in this matter would be appreciated. Should you have any questions feel free to contact this office. Very truly yours, = ; AVT4L S RAMON A. DIAZ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING RAO/SBS/tm cc: Leidenfrost/Horowitz & Associates Carver Management Co. 25.56.440 Ta:<e-out-estaura^ts--Cur'_ The SiZ.a and location of cu---- cuts for cri'vewa'%s a-_ be deterrninad by standards develcpma_nt by the de,,a--7menc. c' envircnmentaL services. (Ord. 98 ji(pa1"=) , 1973: EXn i'-- It. A 525.32-:t. (3)). 25.56.450 Take-out restaurants--Lardscarinc. :Iot la=as than twenty percent of the, total site area shall be devct.-ad to landscaped planting areas. (Ord. 98 51(part), 1975: Exhibit A §25.32-9.02(4)). 2° 4-0 ' sI n.dards in a1'_ nes. —;er. _a velopmenz occurring ,in ar.y zone in the c-tyVshail be c__t.i tally reviewed relative to mitigating any negative impaicts from lighting proposed as a part of development. The u.—a a lighted tennis courts and the use of lights in commercia. developments will be particularly reviewed. (Ord. 98 yl (part), 1975: Exhibit A 525.32-9.03). 25.56.480 Trash handling alternative. An alternative to a trash enclosure shall include the placement of a trash bin in a concrete or metal lined pit. Use, location and design of the trash handling facility shall be reviewed and approved by the local disposal service and the city. (c)rd. 283, 1982). 25.56.490 Expiration dates of application approvals. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this code related thereto, the anniversary date of any application approvals shall he tied to the effective approval date of the tentat-ve tract map as processed for that property. When there is no tentative tract map application involved with a particular property, the anniversary date for determining the expiration of any application approvals shall be tied to the effective approval date of the most recently approed application. When there is only an individual application rvelating to a particu- lar property, then the expiration date of the application shall be as set forth in the code relating to that application. (Ord. 304 (part), 1982). 393 (13alm Desert 9/83) INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1986 SUBJECT: 73-001 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE (MOBIL) FINAL INSPECTION Final approval will be granted when the following items are taken care of: 1. Landscaping on or adjacent to site being completed by 2-17-86 per agreement with Wilson Landscaping and Mark S. McMenomy, Mobil Area Manager. 2. Barricade plan is to be approved and implemented to separate Lucky market construction from balance of site. 3. Entire site must be cleared of debris (rocks, wood, containers, metal, etc.) in all areas except Lucky construction site. 1 SBS/tm INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM City of Palm Desert TO: BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT FROM: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1986 SUBJECT: 73-131 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE FINAL INSPECTION (BUILDING `C') Final approval will be granted when the following items are taken care of: 1. All landscaping must be installed prior to final approval of last building on site. 2. Barricade plan is to be approved and implemented to separate Lucky market construction from balance of site. 3. Entire site must be cleared of debris (rocks, wood, containers, metal, etc.) in all areas except Lucky construction site. 4. Provide_ directional marking and parking lot striping as instructed, on parking lot. 5. Provide acceptable parking lot lighting system by final approval of last building on site. These comments also apply to building `E'. 49-5r/ A SBS/tm AGENDA ITEM NO. III -A- 9 DATE: JANUARY 28, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., 559 S. Palm Canvon Drive, Palm Springs. CA 92262, NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of monument sign for shopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: PC (2) DISCUSSION: Recently, the commission reviewed and rejected the originally proposed monument sign. That sign had a metal wood grain finish can background with raised internally lit plexiglass letters. REVISED PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing a grey sandblasted concrete sign with recessed letters. The background would be 18.5 feet wide and 7 feet high and mounted on a portion of the stone wall that is 3.75 feet high. The sign copy would take up 31.5 square feet of area which complies with code requirements. The location would be at the intersection of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue in the same location as before. The overall height of the sign would be 10.75 feet from finish grade. The sign would be lit up by ground mounted lights. RECOMMENDATION: The sign complies with size and height requirements determine whether the design is acceptable. Prepared by �Cln ti7� /dig r The commission should C5�$il'zr Oo :ff T 81 = 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MOBIL OIL CO, c/o HILLYARD 8 CO, P.O. Box 256, Balboa Island, CA 92662; RON GREGORY 8 ASSOCIATES. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised landscape plans. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey and Country Club. ZONE: PC (2) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved this case. Date of Action: October 8, 1985 Vote: Carried 3-0-1 (Chairman Gregory abstaining) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 8. 1985 Commission had some concerns with the proposed colors. Mr. Jack Brand, applicant, indicated that they were trying to liven up the center and make it more attractive. Commissioner Martin indicated that he liked the blue but not the yellow and that he would be willing to approve just the blue. Commissioner Holden stated that there is already several different colors approved for this center. He noted that the design and style of the signs were fine. Mr. Brand suggested that the commission approve the sign program concept and that he come back with a color proposal at a later date. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve this case subject to the following conditions: 1. That the lettering on the octagonal building be reduced to B". 2. That the yellow color be deleted, only blue is approved at this time. Carried 4-0 B. CASE 140: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MOBIL OIL CO., c/o HILLYARD & CO., P.O. Box 256, Balboa Island, CA 92662; RON GREGORY & ASSOCIATES. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised landscaping plans adjacent to Mobil Oil station. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) There seemed to be conflicting plans on the height of the wa 1 1 at the rear of the station. This matter was resolved and it was decided that the additional landscaping would not be necessary. It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve this case. Carried 3-0-1 (Chairman Gregory abstaining). 9 AGENDA ITEM NO. III-A-8 DATE: October 8. 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MOBIL OIL CO.. c/o HILL -YARD & CO.. P.O. Box 256. Balboa Island. CA T92662: RON GREGORY 8 ASSOCIATES. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised landscapina_ plans adiacent to Mobil Oil station. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterev Avenue and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) DISCUSSION: At the last meetina on September 24. 1985, the commission approved revised elevations for the service station subiect to a revised landscaping Dian being submitted for approval. That Plan has been submitted showing additional landscapino to provide some screening of the building. RECOMMENDATION: The commission should review the plans and determine acceptability. Prepared by /dig 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MOBIL OIL CO, c/o HILLYARD & ASSOC., P.O. Box 256, Balboa Island, CA 92662: CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP. 559 S. Palm Cnavon Drive, Palm Springs. CA 92262: BERNIE LEUNG, 73-960 El Paseo #4, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of changes to Mobil Oil plans. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the apolicant, the architectural commission approved this case subject to conditions. Date of Action: Seotember 24, 1985 Vote: Carried 2-0 (An aooeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. It it now your responsi- bility to submit approved, stamped plans to the building department. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 24. 1985 Mr. Fox indicated that the awning could/be moved if another tree was removed or the bell front of the awning was made flat. ommissioner Cook noted that would prefer that the tree be moved if the awning was belled n both ends. Mr. Diaz Questioned if the P m Desert Property Owner's Association had ranted approval for thi awning. The olicant did not ave approval from the association. He auestI. ned if there w ld be a problem with the awning_ having_ a three f of overhang o the sidewalk. Mr. Smit informe the applicant that he must speak with public works deoa tment f r this information. It was mold b Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Holden to continu his case to allow Palm Desert Property Owner's Association cVproval. Carried 2-0 4. CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP, 559 S. Palm Canyon Drive. Palm SDrinas. CA 92262: BERNIE LEUNG, 73-960 El Paseo #4. Palm Desert. CA 92260. MOBIL OIL CO., c/o HILLYARD & ASSOC., P.O. Box 256. Balboa Island. CA 92662. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of changes to Mobil Oil plans. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and County Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) Commissioner Holden was concerned with the canopy remaining the same height when the building height was being reduced. There was also concern about the rear of the building not being adequately screened. Commissioner Cook explained that the applicant may not need a wall at that point, but that landscaping could be utilized for screening. It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Holden to approve this case subject to the following conditions: 1. That the sian at the rear of the building be removed. 0 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 24, 1985 2. That a revised landscape plan be submitted and approved by this commission. Carried 2-0 IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. LETTER FROM JOE CICCHINI It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook to receive and file the letter from Joe Cicchini. Carried 2-0 V. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 2:55 p.m. STEVE SMIT�iate Planner /dla 7 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 August 15, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., 559 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs. Ca 92262: BERNIE LEUNG. 73-960 El Paseo #4 Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT• Revised approval of rear elevation of buildings A, B and C. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission minute motioned this case. Date of Action: August 13, 1985 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (I5) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. It is now your responsi- bility to submit approved, stamped plans to the department of building and safety. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION TUESDAY - AUGUST 13, 1985 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED HARING DRIVE • • a a • ♦ • a • a • • • • a • • a a • • a : • a • • a • • a • • a a a • • a I. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 pm after a one hour study session. Members Present: Ron Gregory, Chairman Rick Holden Bernie Leuno Charlie Martin Members Absent: Al Cook Staff Present: Ray Diaz Steve Smith Phil Drell Donna Gomez It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Leung to approve the minutes of July 23, 1985 as written. Carried 2-0-2 (Chairman Gregory and Commissioner Martin abstaining). [1. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 4-0. A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: 288 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): NICK JORGENSEN, 48-596 Oakwood Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final plan approval of plans for triplex. LOCATION: South side of Driftwood, west of Deep Canyon. ZONE: R-3 (3) Subject to landscape plan being approved by this commission. 2. CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., 559 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Sprinas, CA 92262; BERNIE LEUNG, 73-960 El Paseo, #4, Palm Desert, CA 92260. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION AUGUST 13, 1985 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Revised approval of rear elevation of buildings A. B, and C. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) 3. CASE NO: 1024 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): FRED C. MORRISON, 119 N. Indian Avenue, Palm Springs, CA 92262. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Request for approval of a sign for Morrison's Fila Collection and Morrison's Tennis Collection. LOCATION: 72-624 El Paseo, C5. ZONE: PC (3) 4. CASE N0: 255 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): STEVE SULLIVAN, 73-700 Highway Ill, Suite 7, Palm Desert, CA 92260: ROBERT RITCHEY, 45-120 San Pablo, Suite 2d, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a 9,000 square foot two story office building. LOCATION: Southwest corner of San Carlos and Alessandro. ZONE: C-I B. Preliminary Plans: I. CASE NO: 264 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): LARRY LABONTE, A.I.A., 2182 Dupont Drive, Suite 12, Irvine, CA 92621. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 7000 square foot kidney dialysis center. 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. III-A-2 DATE: August 13. 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., 559 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Sorinq_s, CA 92262; BERNIE LEUNG, 73-960 El Paseo, #4, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE Of PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Revised approval of rear elevation of buildings A, B and C. LOCATION: South east corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) DISCUSSION: Final plans were approved in March of 1985 for buildings A, B, C 8 E. At that time the rear elevations of buildings A & B (which are on each side of the market), and building E (which is to the east of the market) were required to provide some architectural treatment since they are facing residential property. An 18 inch deep lath and plaster fascia to tie in with the front fascia was approved. Due to the excessive cost of the fascia, the applicant is asking to modify the fascia by nailing three 2X's t the wall and plastering over that. Therefore, the fascia would protrude six inches instead of 18 inches. The commission should review the change and determine acceptability. Prepared by -S.6- SCtl1�lJY� FAM. ^= E 4 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES S'Ty, OF PALM DESERT —. . CG�Ck " SAME; nrA-J 2D 7YIP do SC /a dr Me Bl fc 51 A ZiL Z :c�.•= C �T��.:L�JF4A'_LiA'-l�:fic o. ,r- ;;E`er _. s-•�G,.� . ' KAT+I--F-� -- TJ- Ilj Is" (7Ty PD r - -A74 � PLA4: c.;, =aq�-jA 12C-C1 ..--- \ i co or -- - �d I ' i C7k:,J LCa�' n L- LD I I- ---A gf-a- E zk V E- EX PA, a I -T'r N A" L May 20, 1985 l r—r=a��� (: :ff 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): LUCKY STORES, INC. 6565 Knott Avenue, Buena Park, CA 90602; LEIDENFROST/HOROWITZ AIA & ASSOC., 3407 W. Olive Avenue, Burbank, CA 91505. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for super market. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission minute motioned this case. Date of Action: May 14, 1985 Vote: Carried 3-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writting to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. It is now your responsibility to submit approved, stamped plans to the department of building and safety. Gf:a�j�r oil :10ma = 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 May 20, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): LUCKY STORES, INC. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of signage for Lucky Stores. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey and Country Club. ZONE: PC (2) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural -review commission approved this case. Date of Action: May 14, 1985 Vote: Carried 2-1 (Commissioner Cook opposed) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY - MAY 14, 1985 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE * * � �r x x x �r + -� �r r x- -x �- r �r * � * * r * * r « �r * ■ * a * +r * * * r . �r * . a I. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. after a one hour study session. Members Present: Members Absent: Staff Present: Al Cook Rick Holden Charlie Martin Ron Gregory Bernie Leung Ray Diaz Steve Smith Stan Sawa DonnaGomez It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve the minutes of April 23, 1985. Carried 3-0 The minutes of April 9, 1985 are to be carried over for approval at next meeting. II. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Holden to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 3-0 1. CASE NO: 243 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): COACHELLA VALLEY TV, 74-175 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260; JOHN OUTCAULT, AIA, 74-133 El Paseo, #11, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for an industrial administrative building. LOCATION: West side of Cook Street, approximately 650 feet north of 42nd. ZONE: S.I. S.P. Subject to the landscape plans to be reviewed at the next Architectural Commission -meeting. 2. CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): LUCKY STORES, INC., 6565 Knott Avenue, Buena Park, CA 90602; LEIDENFROST/HOROWITZ AIA & ASSOC., 3407 W. Olive Avenue, Burbank, CA 91505. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for super market. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) 3. CASE NO: 284 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MCBAIL COMPANY, 3240 Stone Valley Road West, Alamo, CA 94507. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary architectural and landscape approval. LOCATION: Southwest corner Portola and Country Club. ZONE: PR-5 Subject to the following conditions: MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MAY 14, 1985 Case No. 219 C Continued Commissioner Martin suggested that the storage area be stucco to match the building and that landscaping be provided to screen the structure. Commissioner Holden asked that the applicant provide additional drawings that would show the ,wood gates and trelis. It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook to grant preliminary approval subject to the following: 1. The trash compactor area walls must be stucco to match the building. 2. Provide additional drawings showing gates and trelis and additional landscape area around the perimeter. U 6. CASE NO: PP 85-9 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOLDEN do JOHNSON ARCHITECTS, 73-330 El Paseo, Suite B, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a bank. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Monterey and Highway Ill. Commissioner Martin noted that the applicant should watch for sun glare at the drive thru window because patrons will be facing west at this point and this is a problem at Bank of America. Commissioner Holden suggested using landscaping to help screen the sun. The commission indicated that it wished, for the record, to indicate its support for the proposed site plan utilizing the street vacation in that area. It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin to grant preliminary approval for this case. Carried 3-0 IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. LUCKY STORES, INC. - Signage Mr. Sawa noted that they are allowed 155 square feet of signage and are requesting 150 square feet. Commissioner Cook indicated that he would go along with the sign program if the colors were keyed down some. He felt that they were too bright. Commissioners' Martin and Holden had no objections. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve Lucky signs. Carried 2-1 (Commissioner Cook was opposed). 2. FIRE STATION - PORTOLA AVENUE do COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE Commissioner Martin questioned the relationship of the wall between the fire station and the country club homes. Mr. Diaz indicated that the wall is to be 15 feet high, which staff feels is too high. Mr. John Outcault, architect representing the city, advised that it had been discussed to drop that area down in tiers (crib walls) and add landscaping. It was pointed out that the city engineers and the property owners are working this out. It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve with the following condition to apply. 1. Landscape plans to be reviewed at next architectural commission meeting. AGENDA ITEM NO. III-A-2 DATE: May 14, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): LUCKY STORES, INC. 6565, Knott Avenue, Buena Park, CA 90620; LEIDENFROST/HOROWITZ AIA do ASSOC., 3407 W. Olive Avenue, Burbank, CA 91505. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for super market. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) DISCUSSION: The preliminary plans were originally approved on March 9, 1982 and have received time extensions and several amendments since that time. To date, the Mobil Oil final plans and buildings A, B, C do E final plans have been approved by the commission. The market operator is required to submit a letter indicating he has read the latest conditions of approval (planning commission resolution) and will abide by them. This has not been received. This will need to be done prior to issuance of any building permit. During the July 1984 review of revised elevations, the architectural commission required that additional treatment be given the rear of the buildings facing the south. The architect has extended the stucco fasica around the buildings and used a painted standard block for the rear wall. The sign program has not been approved. information to approve them at this time. permits can be issued. RECOMMENDATION: Signs are shown, but there is inadequatre This will need to be done before any sign The plans appear to comply with the preliminary approval and can be approved though, staff would like to remind the applicant that all conditions of approval (planning commission and architectural commission) will need to be complied with. Prepared by � A&,T(/�. /dlg March 29, 1985 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., 599 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92262; BERNIE LEUNG, 73-960 El Paseo #4, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for buildings A, B, C & E in shopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission approved this case. Date of Action: March 26, 1985 Vote: Carried 2-0-2 (Commissioners' Gregory and Leung abstaining) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MARCH 26, 1985 3. CASE NO: 164 C 0 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., 599 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92262; BERNIE LEUNG, 73-960 El Paseo 114, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for buildings A, B, C & E in shopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) Mr. Sawa addressed some concerns that were pointed out in the staff report. The applicant did not wish to install a hedge along Country Club Drive to screen the parking lot area. They preferred to use mounding to screen the parking area. It was pointed out that the mounding would not meet the 3 to 3.5 foot requirement. Mr. Diaz read the screening requirements from the zoning ordinance: "25.58.110. All off-street parking areas shall be screened to minimize the visual impact on adjacent streets and properties. No parking space shall be located within 6 feet of any street property line." Mr. Diaz noted that no specific height is mentioned and also pointed out that the said parking area is 13 feet from the street property line. He noted that this is a minor modification based on the code and could be taken to planning commission for approval. Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve the plans as submitted in that the case of the code modification be brought to the planning commission and all planning commission conditions be met. Carried 2-0-2 (Commissioners' Gregory and Leung abstaining). 4. CASE NO: SAT ANT 8 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RITE TV, 74-065 Highway III, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of satellite antenna dish. LOCATION: 74-065 Highway III Commission questioned if the antenna dish could be painted or covered with a cloth mesh. The applicant replied that painting it with darker colors would interfere with reception and that it could not be covered with a mesh cloth. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve Case No. SAT ANT 8. Carried 4-0 IV. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 3:10 p.m. STEVE SMITH, Assdciate Planher /dig AGENDA ITEM NO. III -A= 6 DATE: March 26, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP, 559 S. Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92262; BERNIE LEUNG, 73-960 El Paseo, #4, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for buildings A, B, C & E in shopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) DISCUSSION: The preliminary plans were originally approved on March 9, 1982, and have received time extensions and several amendments since that time. To date, the Mobil Oil final plans have been approved. This request is for final approval of buildings A, B, C & E, which are most of the retail buildings. The market plans are not a part of this approval and are being drawn by another architect. The plans appear to comply with the preliminary approval with several exceptions. The preliminary landscaping approval required a hedge along Country Club Drive to screen the parking lot area. The applicant's landscape architect indicates they would prefer not to use a hedge. Instead they would like to attempt to provide the screening by mounding. This is acceptable provided the mounding is between 3 and 3.5 feet high. If at the time of final inspection the mounding is not acceptable, a compatible wall and/or landscaping will need to be provided. The parking lot lighting information has not yet been submitted to staff for approval. This must be done prior to issuance of any permits and is very critical since there are homes to the south. The development plan approval by the Planning Commission requires a parking lot striping and safety sign plan to be submitted with the working drawings. This has not been submitted and must be done now. Additionally, the market operator is required to submit a letter indicating he has read the latest conditions of approval (planning commission resolution) and will abide by them. This has not been received. During the July, 1984 review of revised elevations, the Architectural Commission required that additional treatment be given the rear of the buildings facing the south. The architect has extended the stucco fascia around the buildings he has worked on. The sign program including center identification signs has not been approved. This will need to be done before any sign permits can be issued. RECOMMENDATION: The plans will be acceptable once the screening along Country Club Drive and the other issues described above are resolved as recommended. Prepared By S, S G,Wk /dlg J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1033 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR A COMMERCIAL CENTER IN THE PC (2) ZONE. CASE NO. DP 01-82 (Amendment #2) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 5th day of March, 1985, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP for approval of an amendment to their previously approved development plan for a shopping center to permit deliveries on the west side of the market on Saturdays in addition to the Monday through Friday deliveries already approved for property zoned PC (2) (District Commercial Center) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 104, Tract 11791 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project has previously been reviewed and no further documentation is deemed necessary. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said amendment: The design of the use will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The use will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The use will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of DP 01-82 (Amendment #2) is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That this resolution supersedes Planning Commission No. 986*. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 19th day of March, 1985, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary Am BUFORD CRITES, Chairman *The Palm Desert Planning Commission did on the 19th day of February, 1985, approve a modification to condition #6, pertaining to noise mitigation. -1- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. DP 01-82 (Amendment #1) Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the city which include, but are not limited to, architectural review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of approval unless an extension of time is granted; otherwise said approval shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Architectural Commission City Fire :Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permits or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the department of building and safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. ****5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market to be only between 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday through Friday only, with Saturday deliveries permitted per the following schedule: Winter Hours: 10:00 a.m. thru 6:00 p.m. - maximum of five deliveries during an eight hour period. Summer Hours: 9:00 a.m. thru 7:00 p.m. - maximum five deliveries during a ten hour period. If within six months of market opening complaints are received regarding Saturday deliveries, planning commission shall determine whether Saturday deliveries are to continue. ***6. Project to be redesigned so that outdoor noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA and indoor levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, as measured at the residential units to the south, with applicant to submit verified data by qualified noise engineer; revised plan to be reviewed by the planning commission prior to submission of final construction drawings. Lots 13 and 14 shall be provided with additional landscaping to satisfaction of property owners and applicant. If within one year of opening of super market noise maximums are exceeded and owners of lots 13 and 14 feel noise levels are unacceptable, walls shall be provided by applicant and/or market operator as recommended by Hilliard noise study dated January 16, 1985, to satisfaction of the city. 7. All architecture of future buildings to be compatible with architectural commission approval of plans. 8. Trash enclosures for each detached building to be provided; with design and location to be approved by city and local trash company. -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. **9. All public street and parking lot improvements shall be constructed as a part of the phase that includes market; service station improvements to include full loop driveway from Country Club Drive to Monterey Avenue. 10. All conditions of the architectural commission shall be met. 11. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval, subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. 12. Driving aisle south of building "D" to Sagewood Drive shall be increased to 24 feet wide with no decrease in landscape planter width along south property line. 13. Parking space and aisles shall comply with Palm Desert Design Standards for off- street parking facilities. 14. Eliminte parallel parking spaces since they are not permitted by Palm Desert Design Standards for off-street parking faciities. 15. Three to 3.5 foot decorative wall and/or mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot area from streets. **16. Setbacks for building "E" shall be increased to a minimum of 20 feet. 17. Aisle to south of market shall be gated for emergency access only. 18. Parking adjustment is allowed to a maximum of 10% of the required parking. 19. Market operator to submit letter indicating that he has read the conditions of approval and will abide by same; letter to be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 20. Parking lot directional striping and safety signs to be provided; plan to be submitted with final working drawings for approval. 21. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. *22. Service station building to be setback 30 feet from Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue property lines per municipal code requirements. *23. Stone wall that extends from building shall be stepped down to three feet in height and extended to within 20 feet of each driveway. *24. Planter adjacent to parking spaces between service station building and westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be widened from 10 feet to 15 feet from property line. *25. Raised landscaped center median in westerly driveway on Country Club Drive shall be provided as shown on originally approved site plan on file in the department of environmental services. *26. Repair and service work in service bays shall be limited to lubrication, brakes, tires, batteries, oil change, and minor tune-ups with all work performed within building. *27. Service station signs shall comply with municipal code section 25.68.380 provided state requirements for signage shall prevail where there is a conflict. Department of Public Works: **28. Combined bikeway/sidewalks next to curb shall be installed on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. **29. Traffic safety striping on Monterey Avenue/Country Club Drive shall be provided to the specifications of the director of public works. A traffic control plan must be submitted to and approved by the director of public works before placing pavement markings. -3- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. **30. Either installation of one half of median on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive or payment of one half estimated median costs at the option of the director of public works; medians to be installed by March 1, 1985. 31. No median breaks shall be permitted within 660 feet of the Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection. 32. Grading plan shall be approved by the city engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. 33. Signalization fund fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 34. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by ordinance to the city engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the city. 35. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive shall be provided by the owner. 36. Existing utilities shall be undergrounded. 37. Sidewalks shall be installed on Sagewood Drive. 38. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218, and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the director of public works. 39. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 40. Size, number, and location of driveways to public works specifications. Fire Marshal: 41. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a 2 hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 42. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 43. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and 2 copies of the water system plan to the fire marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department, and the original will be returned to the developer. 44. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case No. DP 01-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the fire marshal." 45. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating, and delivering the required flow. 46. The market building shall be fully protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system. 47. Fire lanes shall be marked as per municipal code. -4- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. * Condition added by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. +* Condition amended by Amendment #1, September 4, 1984. ** Condition amended as minor change by Planning Commission February 19, 1985. Condition amended by Amendment #2, March 5, 1985. -5- MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JANUARY 8, 1985 CASE NQ;,&j64� APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776; RONALD GREGORY ASSOCIATES. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised pre- liminary landscaping plans for a commercial shopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: P.C. (2) Subject to the following condition: 1. That a row of shrubs be added at the top of the berm so that the effective height of the berm is at least 36 inches. 8. CASE NO: 268 C 270. 69-730 Highway N URE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final arc 'tectural approval of plans for a 10,000 square foot office building. LOCATION: Northwest corner De Afiza and Alessandro. I -3 to he following condit' ns: t the uilding height hall not exceed 30 feet. t a ligh 'ng plan b submitted providing for compliance with city cies rela)\ing to i tensity of lighting in parking lots. 9. CASE NO: 224 NT (ANDADDRESS): COLUMBIA CENTER, R.H. RICCIARDI, ickly Pe4t Lane, Palm Deesrt, CA 92260. NATtJRE OF PR,0JEC1VAPPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of landscape plans. side of Highway 74, between Highway I II and El Paseo. ZONE: P.C. 3 S.P. Subject to e following co ditions: 1. at a other type of g gund cover be used. 2. Tat he boulders be changed from 2-3 foot in diameter to a minimum of 4 foot. Also, that the boulders be grouped together where possible. -3- PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 24, 1984 1. LCASE NO: 232 C ND ADDRESS): COACHELLA VALLEY COUNSELING, Y, A.I.A., 45-120 San Pablo, Palm Depot, CA 92260. OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT/ Approval for carport parking spaces. 73-302 Highway I II ZONE: C-1, Mr. Sawa outlinNLd the salient points frgfn the staff report. Mr. Bob Richey, reg resenting the ap licant, told the commission that the applicant is conce ed with wat flooding his property. Mr. Richey indicated that he ha spoken wi Vic Villeneuve, who said the public works department ha no plans or that area during the next five years. He indicated that Mr. illene a found the repaving and grading plans acceptable. Concern was expressed r arding added water flowing onto adjacent properties durin/raded. Commissioner Chat s ce a block wall was being built, the wall should provide suppor for a glu-lam beam across the frontage of the shade str Commissioner d Mr. Ri hey that the building department might require ber struc ural poles. The telephone poles proposed aren't Mr. Richey reAlied that cost was a prim' ry factor and the applicant had the poles alrVady. Commissioner Cook asked Mr. Richey ho the carport relates to the building. /// Mr. Ric�ey replied that it doesn't at this ime. He said that the applica t recently remodeled the interior and ould be remodeling the exteridr at a later date. Right now his primary oncern is for shade for the cirs and flooding. by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Ammissioner Holden, g the plans subject to the conditons below. Varried 5-0. A. Eliminate two poles on the street frontage. 2. Make the side wall a structural wall for the 3. Provide vines and an irrigation system for carport B. Preliminary Plans: , 1. CASE NO: 164 C (Amendment #0 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776; Bernie Leung, 73-960 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised preliminary elevations for a commercial shopping center. -3- PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 24, 1984 LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey avenue. ZONE: P.C. (2) Mr. Sawa highlighted points from the staff report. During study session Mr. Leung reviewed the plans with the commission. Mr. Perkins, a homeowner of Sagewood, addressed the commission at this time and expressed concern regarding the parking lot lights shining into the Sagewood homes at night, the potential noise problem with cars, and the fence and landscaping between the project and homes. Mr. Richey addressed the commission and explained that he was a board member of the Sagewood Homeowners Association. He explained that they were considering installing gates at the major street entrances. Commissioner Holden expressed concern about blocking access into the new development, thereby forcing Sagewood homeowners exits only at Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Roy Carver, applicant, explained to the commission that planting will be done on both sides of the fence separating the properties. They would be meeting with Sagewood homeowners in the future. Some concern was expressed regarding the rear elevation of the building. Mr. Leung agreed to address that area. Mr. D. A. Robbins, representing Mobil, explained to the commission the size and location of the proposed signs. Mr. Diaz indicated that the sign ordinance is written in such a way that study would have to be made to make certain that the proposed signs conform. Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook, approving the signs in concept only. Carried 3-0-2 (Chairman Gregory and Commissioner Leung abstaining). Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook, to approve the revised preliminary plans subject to the conditions below. Carried 3-0-2 1. Review the architecture on the rear elevation of the building. 2. That a final landscape plan be submitted reflecting change as outlined in the minutes. 3. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 4. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. -4- 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 January 11, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MOBIL OIL c/o HILLYARD & ASSOCIATES, P.O. Box 256, Balboa Island, CA 92662; ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of signs for service station. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: PC (2) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission approved this case. Date of Action: January 8, 1985 Vote: Carried 3-0-2 (Commissioners' Gregory and Leung abstaining) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JANUARY 8, 1985 CASE NO: 281 MF (continued) Commissioners' Leung and Cook questioned the status of the garage doors. The applicant stated that they would submit the color and type at a later date. Commissioner Cook indicated that solor protection should be added to the east elevation of the club house. He also noted that the units took very close together. He questioned if the distance between the units met code requirements. Commissioner Holden noted that the elevations were incorrect and that the commission would need to see actual drawings. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin to con- tinue this case. Carried 5-0. 3. CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MOBIL OIL c/o HILLYARD do ASSOC., P.O. Box 256, Balboa. lsland, CA 92662; ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas San Gabriel, CA 91776. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of signs for service station. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: PC (2) Mr. Sawa presented proposed signs. He noted that the signs proposed do not comply with the code requirements. Mr. Diaz informed the commission that the state has guidelines on price signs. They must include all grades of gasoline and all types of services. Commissioner Cook questioned the existimpe,of a code stating that there must be a price sign on each street. The applicant indicated that the state does allow a sign on each street. Commission asked that she present a copy of the state code noting that the two signs are permitted. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve this case subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant present the state code allowing a sign on each street. 2. Reduce wall sign to meet 10 square foot code requirement. 3. Commission will allow the Mobil horse sign if wall sign is brought to code requirement. 4. Cigarette sign most be deleted. V. ADJOURNMENT:. The meeting was adjourned at 3:00 p.m. STEVE SMITH, ssociate Pliihner -5- 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 January 11, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776; RONALD GREGORY do ASSOCIATES. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised preliminary landscaping plans for a commercial shopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: P.C. (2y Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by staff and the the applicant, the architectural review commission minute motioned this case. Date of Action: January 8, 1985 Vote: 3-0-2 (Commissioners' Gregory and Leung abstaining) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JANUARY 8, 1985 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776; RONALD GREGORY ASSOCIATES. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised pre- liminary landscaping plans for a commercial Thopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: P.C. (2) Subject to the following condition: 1. That a row of shrubs be added at the top of the berm so that the effective height of the berm is at least 36 inches. 8. CASE NO: 268 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): URRUTIA ARCHITECTS, 69-730 Highway 111, #107 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final architectural approval of plans for a 10,000 square foot office building. LOCATION: Northwest corner De Anza and Alessandro. ZONE: R-3 Subject to the following conditions: 1. That the building height shall not exceed 30 feet. 2. That a lighting plan be submitted providing for compliance with city policies relating to intensity of lighting in parking lots. 9. CASE NO: 224 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): COLUMBIA CENTER, R.H. RICCIARDI, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Deesrt, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of landscape plans. LOCATION: West side of Highway 74, between Highway III and El Paseo. ZONE: P.C. 3 S.P. Subject to the following conditions: 1. That one other type of ground cover be used. 2. That the boulders be changed from 2-3 foot in diameter to a minimum of 4 foot. Also, that the boulders be grouped together where possible. -3- AGENDA ITEM NO. III-B-2 DATE: January 8, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 164 C (Amendment #0 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776; RONALD GREGORY AND ASSOCIATES. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised preliminary landscaping plans for a commercial shopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: P.C. (2) DISCUSSION: This item was last reviewed at the meeting of December 11, 1984. At that time, it was referred back to the landscape architect for revision. It appears that most of the changes have been made. However, screening of the parking lot along most of the street is still not adequate. The conditions of approval require 3 to 3.5 feet screening. The plans indicate only 30 inches of mounding. RECOMMENDATION: Assuming the screening along the streets can be resolved, staff feels the plans are acceptable. Prepared by &z2eal� AGENDA ITEM NO. 111-A- DATE: January 8, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MOBIL OIL CO. c/o HILLYARD do ASSOCIATES, P.O. Box 256, Balboa Island, CA 92662; ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of signs for service station. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: PC (2) DISCUSSION: The applicant has submitted the signs for Mobil Oil service station. The municipal code allows signage as follows: Gasoline service stations shall be limited to those signs as approved by the planning commission as a part of their action on a conditional use permit and/or amendment thereto for the service station which shall in no event exceed the following limitations: a. One double-faced freestanding monument sign not to exceed twentyfour square feet in area or not to exceed eight feet in height, and advertising only the name of the company; b. One ten square foot wall sign advertising the company name and/or operator. c. One wall or ground sign, not exceeding eight square feet in area or eight feet in height for a ground sign, advertising the actual lowest price per gallon including all taxes at which regular, premium, and unleaded gasoline are currently being offered. Any special conditions required for sale at such lowest price shall also be indicated. The signs as proposed do not comply with these requirements. Therefore, the applicant should be prepared to present signs that comply with the code require- ments during the study session before the meeting. Furthermore, the hi hose fascia light unit and snaplock sign are not allowed in any case. RECOMMENDATION: If acceptable plans are presented, the commission may take action. PREPARED u �. 9-Z,/* ZG.4 Sq.GI. Mobil PSG\`rD% G<— \OE.N'[\F\CA.'T10A] 5'\GN P?--GP.sus disc. ul NOSE FA6�•IA Ucw UNIT y." — rH SNP.P Los = S R �Q ouT fi `LV SZTo u._ �\OE EtEv TON MONUMEw1T PQ\ CPc. S1GaAl • .. e.,.. Mobil Oil Corporation . Tn AWm iw wow uw.ewo ona aT w. nwru n. u. u wm 5� 4N 44L �y uT�IN y{ m W RAY WM\ ws1�Y� e�iY u/re ewwn wrw OB-SO]-6 ay. I MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 1984 V. Richard Weyerhaeuser of Peoplefeeders presented a sample of the proposed sign. Commission noted that the color of proposed sign was bright compared to other signs in the area. The bright orange would not match very well with the awning it is to be placed on and also other surrounding signs. Mr. Weyerhaeuser noted that when the letters are lit that the color appears to be more of a red than orange. Commissioner Holden noted that he would prefer to see the sign match with other red signs in the area. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Gregory to approve this case with the following condition: 1. That the color be changed from orange to a red closest to the red used on the Cinema 7 sign. 3. CASE NO: SAT ANT 3 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SUNRISE ELECTRONICS, 73-540 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of plans for a radarmesh satellite antenna. LOCATION: North side of Highway 111, east of San Pablo. ZONE: C-1 S.P. Mr. Smith nO.teddthat the applicant wished for the commission to reconsider its past decision on the proposed antenna. At the April 10, 1984 meeting it was denied as proposed. Commission did approve with the conditions that the antenna be placed on the ground and adequate screening be used. Commission felt that the applicant has not made any changes that were requested at the first submittal of this project. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Gregory to deny approval of proposed satellite antenna. 4. CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MOBIL OIL (CARVER) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of final landscaping and signage plans. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. Commissioner Gregqry had to abstain from the vote which made a lack of votes for approval. Commission continued this case to the next meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 2:21 p.m. STEVE SMITH, HAssociate Planner /dlg CONTINUED 3. CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP.; 110 W. Las Tunas Drive, San Gabriel, CA 91776; BERNIE LEUNG, 7390 El Paseo, Suite 4, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for building "E" in Plaza de Monterey. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) Commission granted preliminary approval with the following conditions to be imposed: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the city fire marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. That all condtions of DP 01-82 shall be met. 4. CASE NO: 239 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): THE LAKES COUNTRY CLUB NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: LOCATION: ZONE: 5. CASE NO: 246 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MONTEREY PARTNERSHIP, 64 San Sebastian, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270; CHARLES MARTIN, 73-725 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of landscape plans for an office building. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey and Fred Waring Drive. ZONE: O.P. (office professional) III. CASES: A. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 279 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PALM DESERT PARTNERS, c/o JPH ENTERPRISES, 83-612 Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 104 unit apartment complex. LOCATION: Corner of Hovley Lane and Beacon Hill ZONE: AHDPR-18 Q G Noy MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOVEMBER 27, 1984 CONTINUED Mr. Steve Sullivan presented plans for proposed apartment complex. Commissioner Martin questioned the solar protection on some windows of the buildings. Mr. Sullivan suggested increasing the solar protection on the ends units. He feels that these are the only units that might be lacking solor pro- tection. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Leung to grant preliminary approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the design review board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 2. That the design review board reexamine the solar protection on the end units. IV. DISCUSSION ITEM: CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SAGEWOOD PLAZA (MOBIL OIL STATION) NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of working drawings for Mobil Oil Station. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey Avenue and Country Club. Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve working drawings subject to the following condition: 1. That final landscaping and signage plans be submitted for approval by , the commission. V. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 2:40 p.m. ,&, 0.,( Z7, iel'94 AGENDA ITEM NO. III-B-3 DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1994 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP., 110 W. Las Tunas Drive, San Gabriel, CA 91776; BERNIE LEUNG, 7390 El Paseo, Suite 4, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for building "E" in Plaza de Monterey. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) DISCUSSION: This project is in the Smith's Food King (now Lucky's) center. The commission recently approved revised elevation for the center and a Mobil Oil Service station. This building had not be previously reviewed. ARCHITECTURE: The proposed building would be octagonal in shape with a sloped matching roof. The building would be one story in height with a maximum 24 foot height. At the top of the roof would be a stucco parapet matching the stucco fascia. The roof material would be a bronze metal roof with what appears to be seams. This would be to date the only exposed roof material. The other approved buildings have flat roofs. LANDSCAPING: A preliminary landscaping plan has been submitted for the area around the building. SIGNS: Sign locations around the building which would have a maximum of 8 tenants 0 per side) are shown mounted on the stucco fascia. No details on sign or material has yet been submitted. RECOMMENDATION: The commission should review the plans and determine acceptability. Should this request be approved, the following conditions should be imposed: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the city fire marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenitites, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construciton shall have been completed. 3. That all conditions of DP 01-82 shall be met. Stan B. Sawa SBS/dlg r A, JULY 25, 1984 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 164 C (Amendment #0 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776; Bernie Leung, 73-960 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised preliminary elevations for a commercial shopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue ZONE: P.C. (2) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission moved to approve the signs in concept, and the commission moved to approve the revised preliminary plans, subject to the conditions outlined in the attached minutes. Date of Action: July 24, 1984 Vote: 3-0-2 (Chairman Gregory and Commissioner Leung abstained.) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Minutes are attached. 1 PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 24, 1984 1. jCASE NO: 232 C A PLICANT (AND ADDRESS): COACHELLA VALLEY COUNSELING, c/o OB RICHEY, A.I.A., 45-120 San Pablo, Palm De t, CA 92260. NAT E OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval for carport trellis ver parking spaces. LOCATIO 73-302 Highway III ZONE: C-1, .P. Mr. Sawa outlin\d the salient points fr9(n the staff report. Mr. Bob Richey, r resenting the ap licant, told the commission that the applicant is conce ed with wat flooding his property. Mr. Richey indicated that he ha spoken wi Vic_ Villeneuve, who said the public works department ha no plans or that area during the next five years. He indicated that Mr. illene e found the repaving and grading plans acceptable. Concern was expressed properties during floodir Commissioner Cook sa that s) should provide struct al suppor of the shade structur . Commissioner M tin told Mr might require g ded lumber proposed aren't raded. added water flowing onto adjacent :e a block wall was being built, the wall for a glu-lam beam across the frontage that the building department poles. The telephone poles Mr. Richey re lied that cost was a prim ry factor and the applicant had the poles ai rdy. CommissioCookasked Mr. Richey ho the carport relates to the building. Mr. Ric�iey replied that it doesn't at this ime. He said that the applica�p((t recently remodeled the interior and ould be remodeling the exteridr at a later date. Right now his primary oncern is for shade for the /rs and flooding. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by l mmissioner Holden, approving the plans subject to the conditons below. arried 5-0. 4. Eliminate two poles on the street frontage. 2. Make the side wall a structural wall for the trellis 3. Provide vines and an irrigation system for carport B. Preliminary Plans: , 1. CASE NO: 164 C (Amendment #0 APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776; Bernie Leung, 73-960 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised preliminary elevations for a commercial shopping center. -3- PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 24, 1984 LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: P.C. (2) Mr. Sawa highlighted points from the staff report. During study session Mr. Leung reviewed the plans with the commission. Mr. Perkins, a homeowner of Sagewood, addressed the commission at this time and expressed concern regarding the parking lot lights shining into the Sagewood homes at night, the potential noise problem with cars, and the fence and landscaping between the project and homes. Mr. Richey addressed the commission and explained that he was a board member of the Sagewood Homeowners Association. He explained that they were considering installing gates at the major street entrances. Commissioner Holden expressed concern about blocking access into the new development, thereby forcing Sagewood homeowners exits only at Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. Mr. Roy Carver, applicant, explained to the commission that planting will be done on both sides of the fence separating the properties. They would be meeting with Sagewood homeowners in the future. Some concern was expressed regarding the rear elevation of the building. Mr. Leung agreed to address that area. Mr. D. A. Robbins, representing Mobil, explained to the commission the size and location of the proposed signs. Mr. Diaz indicated that the sign ordinance is written in such a way that study would have to be made to make certain that the proposed signs conform. Moved by Commissioner Martin, approving the signs in concept only. and Commissioner Leung abstaining). seconded by Commissioner Cook, Carried 3-0-2 (Chairman Gregory Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook, to approve the revised preliminary plans subject to the conditions below. Carried 3-0-2 1. Review the architecture on the rear elevation of the building. 2. That a final landscape plan be submitted reflecting change as outlined in the minutes. 3. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 4. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. -4- AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-2 DATE: JULY 24, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 164 C (Amendment #1) APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROY CARVER, 110 W. Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776; Bernie Leung, 73-960 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised preliminary elevations for a commercial shopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue, ZONE: P.C. (2) DISCUSSION: This request is for approval of revised elevations for a commercial shopping center which the commission approved on March 9, 1982. The project consists of a market, attached retail shops, and separate satellite buildings. Staff is presently processing an amendment request to the planning commission to delete two buildings at the northwest corner of the site and replace it with a gasoline service station. The revised elevations include the proposed service station even though it has not yet been approved. ELEVATION PLANS: The revised elevations submitted include the market and attached retail stores, detached building "c" and the service station. The architecture of the revised plans can probably best be called "desert" style as opposed to the more "spanish" style of the original plans. The revised materials consist of stucco walls and columns with some slump stone walls around the front of the market, horizontal, wood glu-laminated fascia beams, and a stucco fascia above the wood fascias. Additionally, in front of the market area large natural looking grey stone veneer columns of varying heights are proposed. The rear elevation of the market and retail buildings is plain and similar to the original elevations. There should be some treatment to the upper portion of the market walls which will be visible to the Sagewood subdivision to the south. The one story, 16 foot high service station architectural style is very similar to the other buildings. The materials consist of stucco walls and fascia, and natural looking grey stone veneer. The colors will be the same as used in the rest of the center. SIGNAGE: A sign program has been submitted which provides for signs for the center, market, and retail shops. Some service station sign information has been submitted. However, there is not adequate information to approve them. Staff would recommend that separate programs for the service station and the balance of the center be reviewed later when complete information is submitted. We would indicate the basic concepts, locations, and most sizes are acceptable to staff. LANDSCAPING: Although this is not a landscaping modification request, the service station addition and several other small changes to the site plan appear to necessitate changes to the landscaping plan. Additionally, it appears that landscaping has been deleted or significantly modified. Staff recommends that a revised preliminary landscaping plan be submitted for approval prior to final working drawings being approved, but after planning commission action. w i' Case No. 164 C Continued RECOMMENDATION: That the commissio the servi conditiona c commission review the revised n may consider additional treat m e station will be subject to planning 1 use permit. Any approval actions conditions: elevations ent to the and determine acceptability. The back of the market. Any action on commission approval of the requested should be subject to the following 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, submitted to the architectural review occupancy permit shall be given by the this project until the aforementioned ap been completed. 4. a final landscaping, grading, lighting, irrigation plans and sign program shall be commission. No final inspection or department of environmental services to proved plans and construction shall have That a revised preliminary landscaping plan be submitted and approved prior to final working drawings being approved, but after planning commission action on the service station. That a separate sign program be submitted for approval. BERNARD K. K. LEUNG & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECT A.I.A. 76-960 EL PASEO, SUITE f, PALM DESERT, CALIF. 92260, 714/946-4226 City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Planning Division 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Project: Plaza de Monterey Shopping Center (Formerly Sagewood Plaza - Approved as Case No. DP 01-82, ADJ. 01-82 6 164c) Re: Written Description of Colors and Materials Gentlemen: June 26, 1984 As per Item VIII of the Architectural Review Committee's submittal check list, the following is set forth as a written description of materials, finishes and colors for the project noted: Location @ Walls/Columns ORock Veneer 0 Block Veneer _®_ Wood (trim and exposed framing) Roofing (low slope) .O Monument Sign Shop and Market Si ns Materials 7/8" plaster finish, rough trowelled At Market, shop fronts and at monument sign Market front Rough -sawn glue -lam beams Built-up composition roof ( :" per ft. slope) Sheet metal background can Raised letter cans Letters (daytime) Letters (Night - back lighted) Back lighted Plexiglass O_ Hanging signs under canopy Sand blasted redwood with painted letters Sincerely, �— Xeard d. <. Leun , A.I.A. BKKL/bd Colors "Sinclair Paints" - Navajo White "Stucco Stone" -Natural Blend "Orco" slump block - natural "Olympic Stain" #709 White "Sno-Coat" finish (fibrated) Baked Enamel - wood grain finish Black painted White Plexiglass Blue plexiglass(underneath) Background: Ivory Letters/Locos: Various Background: "olympic" Stain #711 Letters/Locos: Various paint colors (exterior semi --gloss) ID .� - I ..a "Tr..F STOVE• MARKET MARKET STORER 1� 6Td PARTIAL ELEVATION NORTH O WHO DU[K V6N26A PARTIAL, ELEVATION - NORTH TYPICAL STOREFRONT ELEVATION Q E) 8 I f Bernard K. K. Leung & Ast- �'3tes A.I.A. ARCHITECT 73-960 El Paseo, Suite 4 PALM DESERT. CALIFORNIA 92260 (619)1346-4225TO \\ LIEUIrP, @[F'TRSEDUM DATE`1 v-- J� k1 � � J JOB NO. \J�I RE: �e1l—T IJ\\VJ i�(1 WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ;P.WIer separate cover via � I� y/•E.;� ' the following items: -. LIV.l k'I ❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION J DPc_," : P L clE FL- DO c cn,' v 42f r (" ' THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: PXOLUL9 240s Z� Im. 6:don, Mrs. a!u 1 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. T� C O' OF PA L N D E &, R? ` FOR91 R9® 415 273 PPficMi f eur Lens, Peomm uaertt Ore ��BO _ D156SIG I REVIEW 90ARI +. fr�(L�OlA11i oON FORM: daputtmmSM of * nwd=mm®cn�o �oauneuGan� �lyled®on a roy hP rl 4j";Iw� c..,ev" NARD K. K. LELING & ASSOCIA 73-960 El Paseo (Suite 4) Mailing Address '--""— Palm Desert, California 92260 REQUEST! (Deeafbe soedfic nature of approval requested I REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL °ROPERTY DESCRIPTION: NO. DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82 and 164c) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. -�§2-Q30--.0 t-&-- — EXISTING ZONING PC (619) 346-4225 vwn•r Aumonzarlon The undsrrign•d ;sates that tf»y an the amer (a)Ofilia •-"_=`` ixotlon 'of the filing of this application, proWrty described herein and hereby plus author• -- . "mosses raattve to arty deed resirtctlons. ..•__.....-..-.....-��--- DO By MY SIGNATURE ON TNIS AGREEMENT, Absolve Ms City of Palm Desert of all llctglltles roparding any deed rostrktlons Mat may Ce applbable to Mro e pperty described Mrssn. aeM, r _ . , It __ Apoliaant's Signature 4eeo op 7R 57AFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status m ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categwical Exampnor. ❑ Negative Dectarotlon Otho Accwted byr 5 c mms moui Reference Cos• No. Data rvcn/itf uz,e Design Review Of: EKNA?*0 CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS ppI!can or compliance CASE NO. applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a buildingpermit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this:project�shAll conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental SerVices...Any substantial change requires approval by the Design.Revi.ew!Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation='of .the 'S'tate, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed: Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the near t isting pole not on the property being developed as quired icipal Code. Signatur Date _ —'-"— Department of Environmental Services For'rn la I 1 City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: June 7, 1983 CASE NO: DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82, 164 C REQUEST: Approval of a one year time extension for a development plan, adjustment and preliminary design review case for a commercial center in the PC (2) zone at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. APPLICANT: CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP. 110 W. Las Tunas Drive San Gabriel, CA 91776 I. DISCUSSION: This approval provides for the construction of a 92,215 square foot commercial shopping center anchored by a super market. Original approval was granted by the Planning Commission on April 6, 1982, and by the city council on May 20, 1982. The applicant is requesting approval of a one year time extension for the approval. ff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels this request is acceptable and recommends approval of a one year extension to May 20, 1984. III. ATTACHMENTS: A. Letter of Request B. Location Map Prepared by l t5w! , 6 /244f Reviewed and Approved by Ar -1- CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION SHOPPING CENTER • LEASING AND MANAGEMENT City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Gentlemen: n May 6, 1983'`ta��r iVigy 1 i 1983 ENVI,RO"ENTAL sEIjVIrE` '`r' CF PALM DS-S '(" Re: Case No. DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82 and 164 C Sagewood Shopping Center We hereby request an extension for a one-year period of the Development Plan, Adjustment, Preliminary Design Review Case, and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for construction of a commercial center in the PC (2) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as Lot 104, Tract 11791. Sincerely, CARVER/MANAGEMENT CORPORATION Roy "illiam Carver RWC:kaf cc: Bernie Leung Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested 110 WEST LAS TUNAS DRIVE • SAN GABRIEL. CALIFORNIA 9177E • (213) 283-2132 City of Palm Desert " Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: June 7, 1983 CASE NO: DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82, 164 C REQUEST: Approval of a one year time extension for a development plan, adjustment and preliminary design review case for a commercial center in the PC (2) zone at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. APPLICANT: CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP. 110 W. Las Tunas Drive San Gabriel, CA 91776 I. DISCUSSION: This approval provides for the construction of a 92,215 square foot commercial shopping center anchored by a super market. Original approval was granted by the Planning Commission on April 6, 1982, and by the city council on May 20, 1982. The applicant is requesting approval of a one year time extension for the approval. 11. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels this request is acceptable and recommends approval of a one year extension to May 20, 1984. III. ATTACHMENTS• A. Letter of Request B. Location Map Prepared by Reviewed an Ar -1- S CARVER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION SHOPPING CENTER • LEASING AND MANAGEMENT City of Palm Desert Planning Commission 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, CA 92260 Gentlemen: D May 6, 1983 ��' 1983 EWnOOGF EFrAL SERVIn- LM Dc'SFR Re: Case No. DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82 and 164 C Sagewood Shopping Center We hereby request an extension for a one-year period of the Development Plan, Adjustment, Preliminary Design Review Case, and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for construction of a commercial center in the PC (2) zone, located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as Lot 104, Tract 11791. Sincerely, CARVWMANAGEMENT CORPORATION RoyZlliam Carver RWC:kaf Cc: Bernie,Leung Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested 110 WEST LAS TUNAS DRIVE • SAN GABRIEL. CALIFORNIA 91T 8 • (213) E85-2132 U., . R-2.8 , U(8) 1. 1 1 1 1 Fp- C L 1 MC Y {_ONE lInVarml MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - JUNE 79 1983 7:00 P.M. - CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS * * * * * * * *-* * * * * * * *- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A STUDY SESSION WAS. HELD IN- THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE. PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT 5.00 P.M. - I. CALL TO"ORDER Chairman Wood called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. U. PLEDGE OF. ALLEGIANCE.- Commissioner Richards III. ROLL CALL. Members Present: Commissioner Crites Commissioner Downs Commissioner Kryder Commissioner Richards Chairman Wood Staff Present: Ramon Diaz, Stan Sawa Steve Smith, Phil Drell Phil Joy Linda Russell Barry McClellan IV. APPROVAL.OFMINUTES: May 17, 1983 Moved by Commissioner Richards,. seconded by Commissioner Kryder, to approve the minutes as submitted; carried. unanimously 5-0. V. SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTION Mr. Diaz reviewed the actions of -the council for, the meeting of May 26, 1983. VI.- CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed on the consent calendar are considered to be. routine and will be enacted by one. roll call vote. There. will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of- the planning commission or audience request specific items be removed from the consent: calendar for separate discussion and action. A._ Case: Nos. DP 01-82, AD 01-82,. an !d 6 C 1 CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP.,. Applicants Approval of a one year time extension for a development plan,. adjustment and preliminary design review case for a commercial center at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive.. Rec: Approve as presented. Moved by Commissioner Crites,, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to approve the consent calendar item as presented by staff; carried unanimously 5-0. VIL PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Case No.. CUP 05-839 HERBERT' SILVERSON, Applicant Request for approval of a conditional use permit to modify parking requirements and allow a 1460 sq.ft.. restaurant in the C-1 zone at the southeast corner of El. Paseo and Highway 74, 73-061 El Paseo. -1- M (z5tfNTr o:ff ID(1P=®nP'1 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: June 8, 1983 Carver Management Corp. 110 W. Las Tunas Drive San Gabriel, CA 91776 Re: DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82,,164 C - Time Extension The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of June 7, 1983. TIME EXTENSION APPROVED TO MAY 20, 1984 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the director of environmental services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRBdRY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr CC: File (�$folwp O:ff IPS Tr^r� zmcp=(Sw{]0 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CAUFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOTICE OF ACTION Date: April 7, 1982 Roy William Carver 110 W. Las Tunas San Gabriel, CA 9176 CASE NO: DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82 and 164 C The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of April 6, 1982. APPROVED BY ADOPTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 788 Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. RAMON A. DIAZ, SECRE ARY PLANNING COMMISSION RAD/lcr cc: CVWD File PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 788 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN, ADJUSTMENT, PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW CASE, AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMERCIAL CENTER IN THE PC (2) ZONE. CASE NO. DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82 AND 164 C WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6th day of April, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by ROY WILLIAM CARVER for approval of a Development Plan, Adjustment for parking, Preliminary Design Review Case and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow construction of a 92,215 sq.ft. commercial center in the PC (2) (District Commercial Center) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 104, Tract 11791 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89,,, in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: 1. The proposed project generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PC (2) zone district. 2. The proposed location of the Use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 3. The proposed location of the Use and the conditions under which it will be operated and maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The proposed Use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title, except for approved variances or adjustments. 5. The proposed Use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City's adopted General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1 • That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission Development Plan No. 01-82, ADJ conditions attached hereto. does hereby approve Conceptual 01-82, and 164 C subject to those PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 6th day of April, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, KRYDER, MILLER, RICHARDS, WOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ATTEST: GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman /lr RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 788 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82 AND 164 C Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include, but are not limited to, Design Review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever, unless a time extension is granted. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market to be only between 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Friday only. 6. Project to be redesigned so that outdoor noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA and indoor levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, as measured at the residential units to the south, with applicant to submit verified data by qualified noise engineer; revised plan to be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to submission of final construction drawings. 7. All architecture of future buildings to be compatible, with Design Review Board approval of plans. 8. Trash enclosures for each detached building to be provided; with design and location to be approved by City and local trash company. 9. All public street and parking lot improvements shall be constructed as a part of Phase 1. 10. All conditions of the Design Review Board shall be met. 11. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval, subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. 12. Driving aisle south of building "D" to Sagewood Drive shall be increased to 24 feet wide with no decrease in landscape planter width along south property line. 13. Parking space and aisles shall comply with Palm Desert Design Standards for off- street parking facilities. 14. Eliminate parallel parking spaces since they are not permitted by Palm Desert Design Standards for off-street parking facilities. 15. 3 to 3.5 foot decorative wall and/or mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot area from streets. 16. Setbacks for buildings "E" and "F" shall be increased to a minimum of 20 feet. 17. Aisle to south of market shall be gated for emergency access only. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 788 18. Parking adjustment is allowed to a maximum of 10% of the required parking. 19. Market operator to submit letter indicating that he has read the conditions of approval and will abide by same; letter to be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 20. Parking lot directional stripping and safety signs to be provided; plan to be submitted with final working drawings for approval. 21. Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used. Department of Public Works: 1. Combined bikeway/sidewalks shall be installed on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive as shown on preliminary landscaping plan. 2. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Either installation of one half of median on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive or payment of one-half estimated median costs at the option of the Director of Public Works. 4. No median breaks shall be permitted within 660 feet of the Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection. 5. Grading plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. 6. Signalization fund fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City. 8. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive shall be provided by the owner. 9. Existing utilities shall be undergrounded. 10. Sidewalks shall be installed on Sagewood Drive. Citv Fire Marshal: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County Super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 788 by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 01-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. The market building shall be fully protected by an authomatic fire sprinkler system. 7. Fire lanes shall be marked as per municipal code. MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 6, 1982 A. CASE NOS. DP 0142, ADJ 01-82 ancQ6 C 4 ROY WILLIAM CARVER, Applicant Request for approval of a Development Plan, Adjustment for parking, preliminary Design Review case and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow construction of a 92,215 sq.ft. commercial shopping center in the PC (2) zone (District Commercial Center) at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. In reviewing the staff report, Mr. Sawa stated that only Buildings A,B,C are being proposed presently and the architectural plans still need to be submitted for buildings D,E,F, and G. He stated that Design Review Board approved these plans with some requirements. Staff felt the setbacks for the buildings adjacent to Country Club Drive should be 20 feet as required by code. One of the major concerns expressed by staff was mitigation of noise levels. The noise study submitted by the applicant indicated that the major offender would be the delivery trucks. Staff felt that if newer model trucks were used the noise could be reduced. Staff also suggested that the project be redesigned to mitigate the noise impacts, noting several methods that could be used. The following were recommended options for Commission action: (1) Approve project, with mitigation of noise as condition and have staff review revised plans; (2) Approve project, with mitigation of noise as condition, with plan reviewed by Commission at a non-public hearing; and, (3) Continue request and have applicant redesign project to mitigate noise before approval. Staff recommended option No. 2. Commissioner Richards asked how the City could regulate the age of the delivery trucks. Mr. Diaz explained that if there were any complaints they would look into this and also Condition No 19 states that the market operator agrees to abide by the conditions of approval. Mr. Diaz added that Condition No. 21 be added to read: "Only delivery diesel trucks built after 1974 shall be used." Commissioner Richards felt that this condition could not be regulated through the market operator since a lot of the trucks would be from independent vendors. Chairman Kryder opened the public hearing and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. MR. BERNIE LEUNG, Architect, explained that in the matter of noise impacts it should depend on what the criteria for the level of sound is. He stated that that criteria can be met. He asked if all other developments would have to meet .these same noise levels. MR. CHRIS EMA, of VTN Engineering Co. for McBail, reviewed the noise study report which indicated there would only be a total of 10 impacts per week. At this point Commissioner Wood asked if the developer had agreed with all the conditions of the proposed Resolution. Mr. Leung replied affirmative. MR. MIKE GALLAGHER, of 1vlcBail Co., pointed out that this property was subdivided and zoned for commercial in 1978. He contacted four property o,vners fronting the back of the market and three have signed an agreement stating that they were aware that landscaping on both sides of the block wall would be provided to screen the market building and that a commercial shopping center was to be located at the site. Commissioner Crites asked what the probable reduction level would be after all the proposed changes are made. Mr. Ema replied that for every foot of height added to the block wall it reduces approximately 1 dB. Chairman Kryder asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. MR. ALIBABA FRAZANEH, property owner adjacent to the market, stated he would not sign an agreement because he has a wife who is very ill and felt that the noise impact would be very disturbing. -2- MINUTES PALM DESERT PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 6, 1982 MR. DENVER JOHNSTONE, 40-329 Sagewood, stated that when the agreement was signed he assumed the setback from the market to the residence would be the normal required by code and not less. Mr. Diaz explained that if the setback was set at the normal 40 ft. then consequently the market would have to be moved towards Country Club Drive and the parking area to the back, which means greater noise impact would be created to the residence from the cars in the parking lot. He also stated that the building would not act as a buffer as presently proposed. Chairman Kryder closed the public hearing. Moved by Commissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to adopt findings as recommended by Staff. Carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Co.nmissioner Wood, seconded by Commissioner Crites, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 788, approving DP 01-82, ADJ 01- 82 and 164 C, subject to amended conditions. Carried unanimously 5-0. (Note: a condition included states that the project will be redesigned to mitigate the noise levels, and revised plans to be reviewed by Planning Commission prior to submission of final construction drawings). B. CASE NO. CUP 03-82 - MARIO LALLI, Applicant Request for- ij)proval of a CUP to allow conversion of a bank into a 150 seat restaurant in the C-1, S.P. (General Commercial, Scenic Preservation Overlay) located at the southeast corner of San Luis Rey Avenue and Palm Desert Drive. Mr. Diaz reviewed the staff report and recommended approval with conditions that valet parking be prohibited and additional landscaping be added. Chairman Kryder opened the Public Hearine, and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. The applicant was present and agreed to the conditions set by staff. Chairman Kryder asked if anyone present wished to speak in FAVOR or OPPOSITION to this case. MR. CHARLES RILEY, Manager of the building, felt that it would benefit the City and requested approval. Chairman Kryder closed the Public Hearing. Chairman Kryder asked why staff was recommending that valet parking be prohibited. Mr. Diaz responded that it would eliminate conflicts due to proximity of the Presidents' PLi<.t 1� tot .t.ri frontage road. Moved by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner Richards, to adopt findings as recommended by staff. Carried unanimously 5-0. Moved by Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Wood, to waive further reading and adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 789, approving CUP 03-82, subject to conditions. Carried unanimously 5-0. C. CASE NO. TT 18495 - DAME CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Applicant Request for approval of a three lot subdivision to allow the construction of two condominium units in the PR-5 zone located on the south side of Camino Arroyo North, west of Joya Drive; categorically exempt previously assessed for CEQA purposes. . Mr. Diaz reviewed the staff report and recommended approval. Chairman Kryder opened the Public Hearing and asked if the applicant wished to make a presentation. -3- City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Staff Report TO: Planning Commission DATE: April 6, 1982 CASE NOS: DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82, and 164 C REQUEST: Request for approval of a Development Plan, Adjustment for parking, preliminary Design Review case and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow construction of a 92,215 sq.ft. commercial shopping center in the PC (2) zone (District Commercial Center) at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. APPLICANTS: Roy 110 San I. BACKGROUND: William Carver W. Las Tunas Gabriel, CA 91776 A. DESCRIPTION OF SITE: Bernard K.K Leung do Assoc. 73-960 El Paseo #4 Palm Desert, CA 92260 The site is vacant and relatively flat. The curbs and tie-in paving have been installed on Country Club Dr., Monterey Avenue and Sagewood Drive on the east. There is a 6 foot high block wall along the south property line. To the south is the Sagewood single-family subdivision. B. ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE: North: PR-79 S.P; Vacant South: R-2 8,000 (8); Vacant and Single-family East: P zone; Vacant West: Rancho Mirage; Vacant C. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: District Commercial II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. GENERAL: The proposed project consists of a total of 92,215 sq.ft. of floor area in seven structures. The main structure contains a market (44,262 sq.ft.) and 14,400 sq.ft. of retail space. At this time the applicant is only showing the architectural design for the market/retail building and one additional 8,000 sq.ft. retail building. The remaining five buildings are spread out around the site and will have to come in for separate Design Review Board approval. Access to the site would be through a driveway on Monterey Avenue, two driveways on Country Club Drive and one driveway on Sagewood Drive. Rancho Mirage did comment that they feel the westerly driveway on Country Club Drive should be eliminated. However, staff feels this driveway is acceptable and should be retained. V. A major concern is the compatibility of the project with the residences to the south. The issues of noise, vibrations, privacy, and aesthetics are important and must be addressed. With regard to noise, the applicants have submitted a noise stud y (see attached) which indicates that the major offender will be the truck delivery to the market. The study notes that tentatively ' Y` there will be 18 noise impact generations (in or out) per week with probable on -site traverse -1- Staff Report DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82, and 164 C April 6, 1982 time being no more than 1-minutes per generation. The study notes that deliveries would only be between 7 a.m. to 10 p.m., Monday through Friday only. The study submitted provides information on the amount of noise per event or occurrence. Based on the data the majority of the residential lots on a worst case (1969 trucks) basis would be exposed to outside noise levels(76 dBA average) which would exceed the General Plan Noise Element standards (50-60 dBA), when measured at a point 5 feet outside of the house. The Noise Element points out that noise levels above 70 dBA contribute to hearing impairment. The interior noise levels during each occurrence would exceed the 45 CNEL maximum provided by the General Plan Noise Element for almost every lot adjacent to the commercial center. No information on the before and after construction ambient noise level has been submitted. Staff feels that even if the ambient noise levels are within the General Plan standards, the single event noise occurrences that the single family residences to the south would be subject to, are unacceptable. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only allows a Negative Declacati-�Wbiim prepared if there will not be a -significant adverse impact on the environment. With the project as presently designed, staff feels that the noise impacts of the project will be detrimental to the adjacent residents. As such, the only way the project could be approved is by mitigating the adverse impact. If this impact is not mitigated, CEQA requires that an Environmental Impact Report be prepared. Staff feels that the noise impacts of the project can be mitigated through a redesign to achieve a maximum 70 dBA in the backyard and 45 CNEL inside of the adjacent residences during each noise generation. This can be done by relocating the loading area and access away from the residences. Other devices which can be used are as follows: 1. Redesign parking lot and loading area so that truck circulation behind market is eliminated. 2. Increase planter width next to wall and amount of landscaping for noise attenuation. 3. Eliminate slope to loading ramps. 4. Provide landscaping next to market building. 5. Increase height of wall along south property line. 6. Design wall next to loading area to be noise attenuating. V/�� 7. Construct additional noise attenuating walls. O Iv) - Ac can be ,deduced from the above, staff feels the project cannot be • approved at this time unless the Negative Declaration requires mitigation of the noise impact. Staff feels that the noise impacts will be detrimental to the adjacent homeowners. Even if the ambient noise levels are within the General Plan Guidelines, the single event noise levels (major truck �s deliveries) are higher than we feel the community should be exposed to. Staff believes that once the noise impacts are mitigated the issues of privacy, vibrations, and aesthetics will take care of themselves. Any additional landscaping and setback will insure further compatibility. . r B. ARCHITECTURE: -2- • 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 May 25, 1982 Mr. Roy W. Carver 110 West Las Tunas San Grabriel, California 91776 Subject: meal of Plan 'ng mmission Resolution No. 788, Case No. DP 01-82 Dear Mr. Carver: At its adjourned meeting of May 20, 1982, the Palm Desert City Council took the following action: By Minute Motion the City Council denied the appeal of certain conditions imposed by the City of Palm Desert Planning Commission in granting approval for development of Sagewood Shopping Center located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely,., H� SHEILA R. GILIIGAN CITY CLERK SRG/dh Staff Report DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82, and 164 C April 6, 1982 The structures proposed at this time are spanish in nature and utilize red mission tile roofing, navajo white plaster and concrete block, brick veneer, and wood trim. The major architectural feature of the project is a series of towers, interspersed throughout the buildings. C. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD: The Design Review Board reviewed preliminary plans at the meeting of March 9, 1982. The board felt the architectural and landscaping plans were acceptable as submitted. D. EXCEPTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: The PC-2 zone development standards limit the size of any one coinmereim enterprise to 40,000 sgAt. The proposed market is 44,262 sq.ft. in size. However, the Planning Commission can modify the size limitation by approval of the Development Plan. Staff believes that there would be no adverse effects and recommends the larger structure be allowed. Another exception the applicant is requesting is the market building setback from the south property line. The code requires 20 feet or twice the height of the structure which in this case would be 40 feet. The proposed setback is 27 feet. This is acceptable as a minimum setback since the adjacent properties are at a lower gra0e and the 1 dscapin&will be heavily planted for screening. ovCve',,, 3 ' at'p'ouivy , s ay The code also requires(a bermed setback of twenty feet of landscaping adjacent to the street for aesthetic and screening purposes. If this is required, it would impact and restrict the amount of parking available. The proposed landscaped setback varies from 9 feet to 23 feet. The submitted plans do indicate some mounding. However, staff doubts that the mounding will adequately screen all the parking areas. Staff would recommend waiving the 20 foot setback in those parking areas where the setback is less, provided a combination of moundingg and/or a short wall is used to screen the parking. �p I w�. b u i ld.l 15 P k15� E, PARKING ADJUSTMENT: The applicants are asking for a parking adjustment to reduce the number of parking spaces 5% from 461 spaces to 438-spaces. Basically, the shape of the parcel restricts good circulation and adequate parking which complies with the Municipal Code. The findings and justifications follow in the next section of this report. III. ANALYSIS: wA. FINDINGS FOR ADJUSTMENT: Findings are required for approval of an adjustment. The findings and justifications as submitted by the applicant (staff comments in parenthesis) are as follows: Justification: What practical difficulties or unnecessary physical hardships inconsistent with the objectives of this Ordinance would result if an adjustment was not granted? Would have to decrease building square footage which is already severely limited by the lot configuration. Additionally, if adjustment is not granted, extra landscaping which has been incorporated into the site plan (especially the landscaped driveway median islands) would have to be eliminated, thereby rendering the development less attractive. -3- Staff Report DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82, and 164 C April 6, 1982 2. What exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions apply to your property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone? Justification: A long, narrow lot which necessitates a comparatively large amount of circulation area, thereby restricting parking space count and building square footage. 3. To what extent would the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation deprive you of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity and zone? Justification: Further diminish building coverage which is already only half of the maximum allowed by the zoning ordinance (Art. 25.18-5.04 (1-b) due to lot configuration. (Other properties in the PC-2 zone are not limited by the odd shape of the property and narrow depth). 4. To what extent would the granting of this adjustment be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity? Justification: None. (The parking area is self-contained and does not provide direct access to adjacent properties. Therefore, there is no detrimental effects caused by the 5% reduction in parking). YWrva_ Staff believes there is sufficient grounds to justify the approval of an I 0 rO" Q , adjustment of up tt -in order to provide flexibility in any redesign '�______!r�equired by this approval. i ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Director of Environmental Services has determined that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment provided the noise impacts are mitigated, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. 410ft STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff feels that there are adverse environmental impacts (noise) which must be mitigated if this project is to be acceptable. Provided the noise impacts are mitigated and a Negative Declaration approved, staff feels the overall concept is acceptable. Since the noise must be mitigated which will undoubtedly require some redesign to the plans, the Commission has several ways to proceed. The options are as follows: `�J Approve project, with mitigation of noise (to 70 dBA outdoors and 45 CNEL inside) as condition and have staff review revised plans; ®2 Approve project, with mitigation of noise (to 70 dBA outdoors and 45 CNEL inside) as condition, with plan reviewed by Commission at a non-public hearing; and, Continue request and have applicant redesign project to mitigate noise (to 70 dBA outdoors and 45 CNEL inside) before approval. It should be pointed out that the Commission can review the data as submitted by staff and any comments received during the public review process and determine -4- Staff Report DP 01-82, AD7 01-82, and 164 C April 6, 1982 that there would be no adverse environmental impacts. However, staff would recommend against taking that action since the noise study indicates there will be noise impacts. In any case, action approving the project should be proceeded by approval of the findings for the adjustment. Staff would recommend that option two (approval, with Commission review of the revised plan) be implemented, unless there is interest for further public scrutiny of the plans. In that case, staff would recommend continuing the case with revised plans being resubmitted. V. ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Resolution B. Legal notice C. Noise Study D. Initial study and Draft Negative Declaration E. Letter from architect dated Feb. 12, 1982. F. Design Review Board minutes of March 9, 1982. G. Comments from other departments and agencies. �Q H. Plans and Exhibits. v Submitted by Reviewed and /Ir -5- roz PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ### A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PLAN, ADJUSTMENT, PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW CASE, AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMERCIAL CENTER IN THE PC (2) ZONE. CASE NO. DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82 AND 164 C WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 6th day of April, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by ROY WILLIAM CARVER for approval of a Development Plan, Adjustment for parking, Preliminary Design Review Case and Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact to allow construction of a 92,215 sq.ft. commercial center in the PC (2) (District Commercial Center) zone located at the southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive, more particularly described as: Lot 104, Tract 11791 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-8911, in that the Director of Environmental Services has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did find the following facts to justify their actions, as described below: 1. The proposed project generally conforms to the intent and purpose of the PC (2) zone district. 2. The proposed location of the Use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. 3. The proposed location of the Use and the conditions under which it will be operated and maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The proposed Use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this title, except for approved variances or adjustments. 5. The proposed Use complies with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City's adopted General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conceptual Development Plan No. 01-82, ADJ 01-82, and 164 C subject to those conditions attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 6th day of April, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: GEORGE D. KRYDER, Chairman ATTEST: RAMON A. DIAZ, Secretary /lr r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DP 01-82, ADJ 01-82 AND 164 C Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits on file with the Department of Environmental Services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any uses contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first complete all the procedural requirements of the City which include, but are not limited to, Design Review and building permit procedures. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within one year from the date of final approval otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever, unless a time extension is granted. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Department of Health Palm Desert Design Review Board Process City Fire Marshal Coachella Valley Water District Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 5. Major truck deliveries and trash pick-up for Market to be only between 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Friday only. 6. Project to be redesigned so that outdoor noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA and indoor levels do not exceed 45 CNEL, as measured at the residential units to the south, with applicant to submit verified data by qualified noise engineer; revised plan to be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to submission of final construction drawings. 7. All architecture of future buildings to be compatible, with Design Review Board approval of plans. 8. Trash enclosures for each detached building to be provided; with design and location to be approved by City and local trash company. 9. All public street and parking lot improvements shall be constructed as a part of Phase I. 10. All conditions of the Design Review Board shall be met. 11. Detailed parking lot and building lighting plan shall be submitted to staff for approval, subject to applicable lighting standards; plan to be prepared by qualified lighting engineer. 12. Driving aisle south of building "D" to Sagewood Drive shall be increased to 24 feet wide with no decrease in landscape planter width along south property line. 13. Parking space and aisles shall comply with Palm Desert Design Standards for off- street parking facilities. 14. Eliminate parallel parking spaces since they are not permitted by Palm Desert Design Standards for off-street parking facilities. 15. 3 to 3.5 foot decorative wall and/or mounding shall be provided to sufficiently screen parking lot area from streets. 16. Setbacks for buildings "E" and "F" shall be increased to a minimum of 20 feet. 17. Aisle to south of market shall be gated for emergency access only. -1- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18. Parking adjustment is allowed to a maximum of 10% of the required parking. 19. Market operator to submit letter indicating that he has read the conditions of approval and will abide by same; letter to be submitted prior to issuance of building permit. 20. Parking lot directional stripping and safety signs to be provided; plan to be submid with final working drawings for approval. a. i , act 7t ec v- � d �7P-t ir-�GS '6:) i1e— USGp Department of Public Works: l&sel 1. Combined bikeway/sidewalks shall be installed on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive as shown on preliminary landscaping plan. 2. Traffic safety striping shall be provided to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 3. Either installation of one half of median on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive or payment of one-half estimated median costs at the option of the Director of Public Works. 4. No median breaks shall be permitted within 660 feet of the Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive intersection. 5. Grading plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. 6. Signalization fund fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Complete improvement plans and specifications shall be submitted as required by Ordinance to the City Engineer for checking and approval before construction of any improvements is commenced. The subdivider shall submit "as built" plans prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City. 8. Landscaping maintenance on Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive shall be provided by the owner. 9. Existing utilities shall be undergrounded. 10. Sidewalks shall be installed on Sagewood Drive. City Fire Marshal: 1. Install a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM fire flow for a two (2) hour duration in addition to domestic or other supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. 2. Install Riverside County Super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 150 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. A. Hydrants shall not be located closer than 25,feet to any building. B. Exterior surfaces of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. C. Curbs (if installed), shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three (3) copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the Building Department and the original will be returned to the developer. 4. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and approved -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Case Number DP 01-82 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 5. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 6. The market building shall be fully protected by an authomatic fire sprinkler system. 7. Fire lanes shall be marked as per municipal code. -3- DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES MARCH 9, 1982 3. CASE NO. 165 C (CONTINUED) On a motion by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Barton, this case was continued in order that the applicant may address the following concerns: 1. That the design of the buildings and materials used reflect the type of image which Palm Desert desires. 2. That the circulation system in the back be worked out and the dead-end parking situation be eliminated. 3. That solar protection be provided if the buildings are turned facing north. Staff was further instructed to indicate to the applicant that the Board would not be able to approve the submittal as presented because of those concerns. Motion carried unanimously 6-0. 4. CASE NO. 164C - ROY CARVER - 110 West Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776 and BERNIE LEUNG, 73-960 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. Approval Sought/Location: Approval of preliminary landscaping and elevation plans for a commercial shopping center at the southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. Mr. Leung asked to be excused from voting but indicated that he would represent this case. Mr. Diaz reviewed the staff report and indicated that staff was not overly concerned that tree wells were not proposed within the parking rows along the common center line of each row of parking (Condition No. 3 ). After some discussion, the Board decided to delete this Condition. Mr. Cook questioned the fact that a blow -sand buffer had not been required. Mr. Diaz replied that if they were required to put up an eight foot high wall the commercial area would not be seen. On a motion by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Barton, the preliminary landscaping and elevation plans were approved subject to the conditions listed below and subject to Condition No. 3 of the staff report dated March 9, 1982, being deleted. 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. Motion carried 4-0-2. Mr. Leung and Mr. Gregory abstained. - 3 - DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES MARCH 9, 1982 III. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. CASE NO. 221 MF - CHACAHUALA LTD, 10677 W. Pico Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90064. Mr. Leonard Greenberg, applicant was not present. Approval Sought/Location: Request for a time extension of previously approved preliminary plans for a 117 unit condominium project on the north side of Mesa View Drive, between Alamo Drive and Arrow Trail. Mr. Sawa indicated that the applicant was seeking a time extension for preliminary plans which were approved by the Design Review Board at their meeting of March 1, 1981 and approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting of March 3, 1981. On a motion by Mr. Cook, seconded by Ms. Jackson, the Board moved to grant a time extension for this case. Motion carried unanimously 6-0. 2. PALM DESERT TOWN CENTER Mr. Sawa reviewed this case indicating that it was before the Board for final approval of landscape plans. The Board reviewed the plans and felt they were adequate. On a motion by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Barton, the Board instructed Staff to compare the final working drawings with the preliminary plan and continue this case to the next meeting. Motion carried 5-0-1. Mr. Cook abstained. IV. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Mr. Cook, seconded by Mr. Barton, the meeting was adjourned at 3:00 p.m. /pa -4- BERNARD K. K. LEUNG & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECT A.I.A. 78-960 EL PASEO. SUITE 4, PALM DESERT, CALIF. 92260. 714/848-4226 June 26, 1984 City of Palm Desert Department of Environmental Services Planning Division a� 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert, California 92260 Project: Plaza de Monterey Shopping Center JUiN 2 3 1984 (Formerly Sagewood Plaza - Approved as Case No. DP 01-82, ADJ. 01-82 E 164c) ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Re: Written Description of Colors and Materials Gentlemen: As per Item VIII of the Architectural Review Committee's submittal check list, the following is set forth as a written description of materials, finishes and colors for the project noted: Location OWalls/Columns ORock Veneer OBlock Veneer _® Wood (trim and exposed framing) Roofing (low slope) _O_ Monument Sign Shop and Market Signs Materials Colors 7/8" plaster finish, rough "Sinclair Paints" - Navajo White trowelled At Market, shop fronts and at "Stucco Stone" -Natural Blend monument sign Market front "Orco" slump block - natural Rough -sawn glue -lam beams "Olympic Stain" #709 Built-up composition roof (%" per ft. slope) Sheet metal backaround can Raised letter cans Letters (daytime) Letters (Night - back lighted) Back lighted Plexiglass O_ Hanging signs under canopy Sand blasted redwood with painted letters Sincerely, ernard .K. Leun , A.I.A. BKKL/bd White "Sno-Coat" finish (fibrated) Baked Enamel - wood grain finish Black painted White Plexiglass Blue plexiglass(underneath) Background: Ivory Letters/Locos: Various Background: "olympic" Stain #711 Letters/Logos: Various paint colors (exterior semi -gloss) AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-2 DATE: March 9, 1982 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROY CARVER, 110 West Las Tunas, San Gabriel, CA 91776 & BERNIE LEUNG, 73-960 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of preliminary landscaping and elevations for a commercial shopping center. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Country Club Drive and Monterey Avenue. ZONE: PC (2) DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing the construction of a 92,215 square foot retail commercial facility. The major facility will be a 44,262 square foot market. Adjacent to and connected to the market are two additional buildings having a floor area of 14,400 square feet. The remaining 33,553 square feet will be in six separate buildings distributed throughout the total lot. The site has a total area of 9.060 acres. SITE PLAN AND PARKING: The site plan and parking for the site will be reviewed by the Planning Commission when it reviews the Development Plan at its April 6, 1982, meeting. ELEVATIONS: Proposed building elevations have been submitted for the market and the adjacent buildings on each side of the market. The typical storefront elevation shows a 1 story, 23 foot high building with a red mission tile roof extending to a five foot high plaster finished facia. The facia rests on a series of pillars 20 feet apart. The pillars are decorated with bands of brick veneer on top and bottom. Individual tennant signs are proposed on the facia area. The actual front of the units is recessed some 13 feet back from the pillars. The most significant features are the 30 foot high towers located at each end of each building. The front elevation of the market is that of a one story structure 22Yz feet high. Two entry areas to the market are proposed. Over the entries and the glazed areas a roof canopy is proposed which sits on a series of pillars. The main wall treatment is finished plaster. The roof canopy's exposed edge is finished in dark brown wood. The proposed rear elevation, adjacent to the residential development to the south, will be a maximum of 21 feet high and finished in concrete block. Additional treatment to this elevation should be considered to provide compatibility with the adjacent residences. LANDSCAPING: The proposed landscaping of this development is important for several reasons. In addition to serving the usual purposes of breaking up the extent of the parking lot and softening the extensive nature of buildings of this size, the landscaping will to a large part, help to ameliorate any adverse impacts generated by the commercial development on the residential development to the south. The residential development to the south is physically lower than the subject site. Along the north property line of the residential development a six foot high block wall exists along with a planting buffer on the south side of the wall. -1- DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE NO. 164 C MARCH 9, 1982 LANDSCAPING (CONTINUED) Since family residences exist on property to the south, applicants of this commercial development are proposing an intensive landscape treatment to soften the block wall and are also proposing vertical growing trees to reduce the effect of the commercial development on the residential area. The landscape plan as submitted is a preliminary plan and specific materials to be installed are not delineated. That information can be provided on the final landscape plan. The present plan does indicate groups of materials from which specific species will be selected. Loading areas are proposed on the east and west side of the market. The landscaping around the loading areas should address the problems related to loading areas. Intensive planting in this area may mitigate some of the problems. Across the front of the market, six rows of parking are proposed. In order to break up this extent of asphalt, the applicant should install some tree wells along the common center line of each row of parking. CONCLUSION: The plans as submitted appear acceptable to Staff to grant preliminary approval. The Board should review them and determine acceptability. RECOMMENDATION: That application 164C be granted preliminary approval subject to the following conditions: /pa 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the Design Review Board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the Department of Environmental Services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. Additional tree wells be provided in the double rows of parking in front of the market area. -2- f" x •ri Ceoa,.cwx x�:c� ate, >>.�^,>5.� . �Ol`r-T�.T TdS 7�b`elc soo4'r _. 7n .9 Zsoa=v rq ` •VlNtloil�'i7 7C19.�IIyi)U�Eb Gdtlm3fl JV1M.,Jp 4i-LI 4G'RU-."NI-)IYfoG nl "W No 40V NI NMalls 9.' I6LI1 1--4U -10 *014011 a�Qrvz�� 1+•'r i J t = r f r E 1.w••v c ' .�S T%L TY. �i`.Yri 14 \'� :4. --- 1 o , � -� �-. ��� a, •,y OIN T�f�' 1� Fil _ J 7 _ "� > ,.+<.. .f✓y). / 1� _ r \ 'Y t �� E 1 '�1.%'�� ,ei' y f. 'I.:Lls °9 tea. � \ � :���' ,-� �' :�'� �,�r� • �� �. �. ~� �, e- MI1 .I� ,^}r` v._ i �� \ -q• !R////% _" � � �f �f�.v �� i.�/�� cc ii..,s ,if i � f ��� � � cl'_. ��._•�. ° y' 1J5 E 0 --�1. _ I Cw+Ln�^ \� � �C3+^_rq1, ��' il' i� '''jj/ " ICI. /�� � f• � \`. i 1 I 0 .•, lI .t. L.c ��; �. d 1 � wovr � �.7 �� //�1' J �-'7 !�3 "7 7 �+ •L) ,�` �" , � � i .,. -;-L .. ....� �. R?J �'> y �„ / _ F•Tc`%1`ta / .,, _ � ' � I - d > n T"%1, ..IN° 1 Tp - v z g _ 1 v 2——r. .. _ s ,fie...: •+--ems-' - `3 i'ii tr9.1 m 1'74 ,^L - fnLYeV=\, y WN NOIIVA313 1N08d3801S IVOIdAl SmIallm, _,...__ .._...r..J.a...�.�.uuil.............u.f..w..._ ..w....y ..... ..... J,..Aw�w.....u. .. ne.�..n�. ..au.v _..o.... HlWO-N - N011VA-313-IVIIHVd wll.+9111 tq-NIN O HIHON - NOIIVA313 1VI1dVd n - n a _ ■iuoi� i��wvw i�Mrvw sarois a +6 SMO1S `- NOI1dA313 30I9 i W h o 4 �' Pit 1 NUM NOIIVA313 HV38; r�V ` Q -IT.+♦ (. is f .t n F-w maim o.J 45 13NHVW - NOI-LVA313 1 Olid _ £3 o ate - to fl n L , L. "* x w , CITY OF FALM DESERT MORI RECEW 5689 RECEIVED OF: VLiZ JX DATE - rJ AMOU NT0's 6, L FOR�- CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE (='T off' ` 6�Il= MGO(c pq 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT CA. 92260 ***DESIGN REVIEW BOARD*** DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PLANNING DIVISION '2%C7Y \N I L LI AA1N, Applicant (please pint) I to W. LAS TUNAS 213�2g5-2132 Mailing Address Telephone Sall C'tA�IEL.. LA 911�CD REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested) FL-A►4 ANC) ELEYA-TIONS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: TRACT II E 1 SOAPING E IN 6Mk 104 PP�IES 19-Z3 OP NSF' RC -COO -Ca, of RIVE2sIOF_ C0047I r CALIFORNIA, ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NO. CDZ2- ©021 EXISTING ZONING fn(L-) Property Owner AuthOriZation THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE OWNER (S) OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND HEREBY GIVE AUTHOR- IZATION FOR THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION. SIGNATURE DATE ENT ABSOLVING THE CITY OF PALM D��ERT OF ALL LIABILITIES RELATIVE TO ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS. DO BY MY SIGNATURE Oj HIS AGREEMENT, ABSOLVE THE CITY OF PALM DESERT OF ALL LIABILITIES REGARDING ANY DEED RES- TRICTIONS MAYBE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. Applicants Signature SIGNATURE (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ❑ MINISTERIAL ACT E.A. No. ❑ CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION ❑ NEGATIVE DECLARATION ❑ OTHER 2• I"I 1002 DATE I "1 • LgIL DATE ACCEPTED BY J f\ S CASE No. C REFERENCE CASE NO. 0 A1MIloa 9GIa7 mI lNIMc11aNS N mF—toR` -vINiI.JiM .W+ rdWa73H NM ja II Il� FI "W N. 1'n✓ 4.LII iaML 40 401 J01 it:�.K-:• 1 I r Ti�:J 5¢ �,a 4: � C.`\V^ 1 7 x r _.� - T ._Lai— i ''. `� - _•.. _ _ • •Jnr f v naL .Rr E .. w < � r ' c :... -� r - _•,r ..ram :°" ,• r? N . :'�•:�i�rrti' •\'./ f '� •�°rr!, 'I�.t 111 I I ! 17 f } { I I I .t �. e�7t .I qtl �-a L� \ - �,W'l.' � .Y^ �f '.I•r � 44 ZC'1 ( �.2I� if� r 4 -,. �t> � 'i .%'•�� N"�ic / .; � X':i"f t � ;� 4J._ 9 }li`.�ti.� (Y � r •arl.r.. �� \ % � � A. ,.11�'a a�,x 1..-'J � � 9 . �i. .7 ^� t�. t'�C S:•.:.. �i UZ:vroGl� ! -a � n r+ �� � x-,7z7Si 1 a � � � � � � �p •,,,y -J � d'e.�'S T"'P ok (— —r. •J t - GVW Mnjl ..y •fir-•.••+••, sJ :' +•r v.; v-T� .*•c 2^' ^• I � T' •� .J- �f' ..� :� i 1 4 - � Cn>•`S"IJ.MN• I1 ) f it �•y�Ll rl � x _' SVIw�wJ,q �I 4 4hM1Y' 9htOlViJxq'�J y J'c F1•:/ s ETA3t A 1.. P a.i ti. �. L,a�,.i p. (7,.i• r �.:. Y t w -ZZ .(� f 1 s� +A+--1-Le.• :-. ' 1 't �2 '+d">-�14YR- I z • t:fi"P F+` s��+/�y�4 .,*.xs�.. N n e 3�5.�" .i'a;4I }•''t'riti"7t x^ e.R .a. 1a""•. 4w'inY'K"xf..a seis ^-�' s vr' ND� S ♦ t 2 Z t -. � I -- r r r 22 I .._ 5 +;Wr�:i�. ...:✓Ai-�1-a ..... _ _....� >n. ..,.. ... _ _ice. Lvd: i.-a o-3. s -Y-._ .d..-.a.......L ,-___.. ... ._. �_ . -. 1.+,.. . _... _ _ _ w. �.; �t l CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review Of: CASE NO. C6WnE4CIA1_ S5"upetwA GEnasa' (Type of Pro,7ect (boy WJL_L JPW\ CAFWE.R 110 W. LA--), �UNAs� SAN GA,6K&L, CA911�� Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being dev loped shall be installed underground as a part of development the neare exis ng pole not on the property being developed s r"equire WMunioftal Code. gnat((Date) Department of Environmental Services Form 1 Iq BERNARD K. K. LEUNG & ASSOCIATES ARCHUECI' A.I.A. 7P990 EL PASEC, SUITE 4, PALM DESERT, CALIF. 92290, 714/3464225 Palm Desert City Hall 45-275 Prickley Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 Attention: Planning Department Project: Sagewood Plaza February 16, 1982 Reference: Written Description of Colors and Materials Gentlemen: As per Item VIII of the Design Review Board submittal check list, I am setting forth a written description of colors and materials for the above mentioned project as follows: Location OWalls/Columns O2 Accent Trim at Columns OTrim and exposed framing Roofing: 1) Low slope roofs ® 2) High slope roofs (canopy and shops) Materials 7/8" plaster finish, rough troweled Del Pisco Tile Co Mini -Brick Rough sawn glue lam beams, decking and round beams Colors "Sinclair Paints" Navajo White Sunset Red "Olympic Stain's" Semi -transparent Stain #713 Built-up composition roof- White "Sno-Coat" ing (;"/ft, slope) finish (Fibrated) Mission Tile "S" - shape Fired Red Clay Palm Desert City Hal r February 16, 1982 Page 2 Signage: O1) Main signs @ canopy front O2) Hanging signs under canopy Recessed, back -lighted w/translucent plexiglass face Carved or sand blasted redwood w/painted letters Background: Ivory Letters: Various Background: Olympic #701 Letters/Logos: Various r I ,- I NORTH ELEVATION (FRONT) OF BUILDING B EAST ELEVATION (SIDE) OF BUILDING C (WEST SIMILAR) I I �i I _ _. (�L.li•-LAN�;NA"t'�b �/� . I�ASGIA W/ "SIf,IG'_,6J�`�' OpAQU� S�P,iN 11111111111,49 NORTH ELEVATION (FRONT) OF BUILDING A .NORTH ELEVATION (FRONT) OF BUILDING C - C-L-U-LAv\lNYA'Et--) �aNN, OF BUILDING C 100ft. JON 2 8 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT N M•�1 • ea O r C4 ON V F CC a \, W W iL ~ y IL W A V N W 40 ON Icy Z 0 Q m � m 001 a. e U J 0) W O w m o U to z� a ,o LL,Z wW d� o o wW � m w oQ z Z 7 N Q /- M 0 N J �p CO N W c Q U date scale drwn by approved BUILDING SHEET Na P•4 5To4t 9K • 09roTo6 -V:) - ill 3S30 WlVd •t nins -03SVd 13 096 EL of SUL L 6 VO '131HOVS NVS CA113 SVNniSVI *M OLL so >4 0 z CO > 0 LOU OVOIOV I I H 3 H V N0II.VH0d800 IN3Y430VNVV4 83AUVO cv LU JO IN3VQd0l3A3a V 0 LU C, M IVIJOSS V V DNfl:lrl *31 ON (IHVNIURR AMUBJLNOUU. E30 VZV`Old a CL Es3 jL____ Z. 0 25 IL 25 1�3s3a trn�� ac � F,, V861 hT AON cn J �— Q v W J Q ZA W ce W Z O n Q of J O Z O — z W F- Q W �' 0 p af J J w Q U O > O CL u O > v Q U Z ,Y O Q x F-- Q V q 0 (�Z9E-895 (6L9) vo `JU3S3a WlVd `Z '31.S `L L L 'AMH 096--El a.jn42a41,43'-Jd ada2spual IfNIMSEV `A110J3aJ a1dNOa llld� �I2IIS34 Wldd b9U•UI ssaaaav CIA a:)aM:) 3wvr� 9or Nvld 9NILNvld LLJ m J U rVIO Z D 0 U J O b IANIAV Y hI II31NOW �' r (t•Z9E-899 (6 L 9) VO `11i3S3a W'1Yd `Z '31S `L L L 'AAAH 096-EL 9an42e4iL pad edo2spual VOTS'V `A110J32!J- d1dNOt OD '31l`dD '1213S3a Wlbd A9H9JL IOW ap VZV Id SSalaav 3 wvN aor J MM 03SIA31 ai= NMv1a Nidid JICII.LICIdZd 31111 li�MS a w r) 0 n I N IAI'da 00 ®.2 H � � d ■ L�313 � Elm■1■1■1■1■1■1■1A 1■1■1M1711II1■ 1■1■1■1■ ■ ■1■1■1■1■1■1■1■1■1�1■1■1■1■1■1■1■1■1�1■1■1■1■1■1■1■ 3NIlHDIVVN 3NIlHDIVIN- s y. ? X' SZ9V 9VE - 09ZZ6 -V:)'1b3S3a WlVd - 6 nins •03SVd 19 0916 EL �lts-Resists aa.ta-Heater`s OLLLO VO '13Ia9VO NVS 'QA18 8VNn.L SVl `m at t. ° v' I' v Z 3 1 I H 3 11 V NOIIVUOcJIAOO l'N31N30VNVV4 83A8VO 7■ �{J �{%] lf�-■ ��/�■■ ^■■ 40 1NMU013AM V S 3 W♦ I j O S S l V N l 1 1 031 031 Q H V N A 3 ff AMWE11NOW . 30 VZVId I ,C6 It Z s _$ aC S 1-3 S� cr ' ,2r b� r OI nlil- rs 0LU J h r LLI J tC \ Z� slZ z49 i j Ste. zow al LJ- TY W 7t-- ZS zY 30<F ff Az I i QZ �1�3�~ !ila ce 3= s s a .,6 / t C14 ul cu- lit ccw a � mo � ° • N 3 � � � Oar Ul r �1. 'h J �Jll1 Sew Ul vi 2 04 sc J zN J Qa o � �. •- _ J C) r J 111M. u M — ILL Ed 3S cc cc U F o© V m L" I �-- �b 'R pl --jq 1 IOZ cc�. 4w - cc ��;o _�� 8 SI cc la s n- z �H u d V tc $ < %l N k La cc J oS �� Nf IF UZ \\ m v ul 3 s �- _I..I�x�,I l ` YY '19 a Mdz � � j�)j 0 1 \. W (3 3S'w 0 K ;F: S Em a- I Ln tit ��Ifl s _ 2' 1 i vn F < g mC o 0 "' N �Lo or cis IV (D �"f — = AI v S e- r r- - z 1Y j L` t If • U w' i ul > ' Al YI N UI U1 VI YI V1 � \ _ / a) ai O N N 7 / OD O pp OO W s o a W vl _ z_, z_ Z_ z z_ zLLI 0. _ _ _ p co C� Q 0 aZ O Q l ^ m m m to m m w a _ �' Z_ --- - - -- - -Z -- - -- U ES Y - ',' ���_I a CL nI'm-- I • j SZZV 91r£ • 09ZZ6 • VO • ill 3S34 W1Vd • b 31ins • 03SVd 13 096 EL ■velev 1 3 21 Z I H 3 11 V sgivljos s v V 9un :fFj •x ■x Q 9Vux21s co w cc a In J U } cc z O U 3AWa GOOM30VS rnm z£ Z 0 F— J m W LLJ — Fn � \ ` `_ Off' ,♦ ,a:: � � U� Q LO co .(O M 0) O CO 0 Q D W Q Q F-- O WO (D W Q mp Z 00 0 H F- co fA m \�� II v \/ j 2 fl VIN 9f 8 J/�Ilp,. / cn '\ „vF�, / / m LLLS-9Z£/6L9 ZEIZ-98Z/8L8 � O 9LL L6 VO '131a8VEJ NVS 'OAIG SVN(11 SVl 'M OL L Z Z NOUVaOdaOO 1N3W3JVNVW 83AUVO -o ® 0 W d0 iN3W3dOl3A3G V • st �� C L. C J W IL AMWE LNOUM 30 d did o T _ v 07 o �. _ W M r U H r d �- �- o W� ^^^ a r IOR r s L F N CO\O r(0N O Nd'M ff. _, a r .,..... co U) to _ O w W W U U W V U m w y L H }cc U w v— v— '+- as Qa �� o l I Z❑ Z a v, cn v, 0-CL a�I N w¢ 0 3 a 000 CO OA (1) `. z Ll ) v U a w O a Q ° C`') 00 M N C)"t CO O It M M c L=� � m • "3 831NOW w 1� (fl 0)0 o 0. 00 0) 0 r } 'HO 3dOH 908 N v x Ill w vi cn U5 to (A (n. cn (� Z t Icc 00000000 O Q w 80 w� d 31V0 Cfl.00000�OLn r IIIIIIII �� • x OOOONOV01` M z z 00t00T 0ww mom f�_0 qt-N �Z\ V Cl) ul Y-0000005 M00000OM QWJJJJ_IW mmmmpmmw - 77 s\ � / Z � U —� h a O Z rn 7 C%1 W r J O (7 / CL ? a 09 Nr ,9L \ \ \ \ \ \ \ W F / a N li nil CO ( j N 00 W 0 Z cc UJ m Q 0 O Q O a D J U W W cc Q o ZZ uj 4- < 0 z Z U.Z �0Y .J Z C Q �mJa 0.. a Q I z a < CC U io a W X ° - 'i- e ----- 199L 0 S:V I ' ,h d{N J I -- / w > e w 00 Fm vi — -- / t0 LO -- j — I z co LU co \I IM I I 2 0i �. / O Z n co J, O v ,Og � % - i 11V v z /� w O 5pllit o OC w / w OI z 9 cc n // I \ r I (h W /! N r �N" ate' i z z O a ,90E Z 4 �- 0 —1' / c a O — � I '�' �•II � z O , w U Z Q ^ cc .' f- N w 3nN3AV k3H31NOW 0 CE00 U)NY- W — U7 U CO (a . V I — a W O U Z } h... Y � Z Q U flz � CD 0 a O O a O 0 } 1 G,� cc 6O o J ¢ Q 'HO w-IVd z cc O w i = ---- - - - •Q 3AV NVIONI 0 Z FE a a)1 Z O LL - Ili v a O U O r N Y F O m 7 z U _Lu w III J 0 IL 65 II z W O > a O NI a 1i CC f'o Z O0 r O2 O cr CO ~ a Q Q p r j ti w M CA o U r LL a LO W o ®� Q m l < N Ad w N Q o O Lu Iwo c< o W J a 2 0 11111 m 11 0 u Ills W 2 rW V a 2 LL O Q z W L a W o W w. W Q u (a Is Z N 00 Q1 >0aN 2 U 0 a .m VL9w 22 Q aN N2 in NQ 0 Jn tD W NM 44 r Zd J' MN Nam JM .QM N oa�o �N� i Z0 Li W I Q 0 I a E9 ! 2 a J j m LL ra W- e� m z SZZt 9VE • 09LZ6 • V:) • lS3t3® WlVd • v nins • o3sYd 13 096£L .'L.-V .I. I H a v v S211viaOSSv v fNlI1:lrl. *X 'A (1H,V.NaHS LLLS-9Z£16L9 Z£LZ-99Z/9L9 )aZLL6 VO '131USVD'NVS 'GA -IS SVNnl swi 'M mi NOlIV80cfHOO 1N3W3E)VN` Vq 83A8VO 40 1N3436013A33 V AStA3.LNOV%l 3O VZV-ld MAE Puz" s �,,- Z giLsuv _LIJ NJ:z : �R K N ry W 6. Z 0 C.) 1 W R Y z 0- F'1 Q W J W z C N z w z' 0 2 0 z z 0 H� HI NI N {.1 096 EL Mir 9ti£ • 09LZ6 •dJ •1b3S34 W1Vd • b nins •03SVd 13 'v`I'v I .3 :1 1 I H 3 H V _ SAIV130SSV IN, 9Nf1Jr1 ON 'X G11v 113 7�a 17�-597i!�c 17r Z Z NVG SNIN''t;_ - _1 -0 pCL Z ■ems W - t/1 � t I in ILL 19SAWNi3rdct 1� LL0 en d � A � y��y 133 • ZT \ NE 13 tLIL CIL Co- d. c(1 d) b a vriYd J 'TINY NVIONI fo! ; � r U Q LU L U S y L11 ID : -- - - 0. - �� K , Q Z -- Z LIJ QQQQ z� _v' 10 3LU . LL ofl- /nvn i LL cc ill , / Lai \ \ �1 IS N 19 ,so E� u10 o? Z:) :ILL LF R IN Z ? `i 1 :z jz13 �, g II tL L1 t- _o z 11 V - l) (2cz 0 :zsc ct 1. � � (3 qL ' j d � d) Z _I r� ri \ V 4!n o4s se :0103S - 8L"0 'V"I'V 'z;IsoloH 'H ijaglaH I LSSbO /3 •VTV'IsoJ;uapla- •3 Jeasp :a;ea :lenaddV 4 :lenoiddV elulo 1 e05 a9-e boon 50S 46 � I � ` � I ol. 1 1 :p8310940 anuaAV OA110 ISOM LOB£ :Ume'a a�vos Jn _r ob of-�_ S31d1OOSSV 18 Z1IMOIJOH/1SOHAN30131 ' - :'O o :UOISIAD :a e t-ea4 s9 N g r a l a . S10311HOHV i I 31AI�Ja GOOM30`dS a o M N.(cn, ul z 0 w z u>! ir I u� w I z X � ¢i wi Z Q 3 w nl } o' Q w ~ U zl F- �I ` a _ ¢- z m w x ¢, D w p X a z of O a - U Z F- w t Ifs u � Q OI_ <A Z G -3Atl . MNOW LN¢Q LLJ w Q Q � �� � _ _,rt . I '2!0 3'd0H 0 m Ili G w - Q wI O z M� Q H O a I\' o <I Z Z C~'3LLI y j Q ' Vd 31dO (. I Y G S z Q I =I Q z1 1I a m N a Cm �� NNNc�N �• im- U IX W W, z w N °� 4 > U� _ +� z L'`i i J J V1 1f? J J J X !h Q Q Q w -� o / N w-o = ---- -------- I � ; [_.. U m 'X W w _ k Z O I J •.-�2f' r r \\ { Ip ,r5z Jz,oN \ O � \ N i \ N >' . v , ui fA N N N rn N N N I• `YX. fA " N cr cc M 2 m m -m m I' r co U U U U C) U U' (� mm tD f0 U! e a oq to N M In f0 c0 r \ V V c) ,.V V V V V O aa cL a a a eL a. W lL IL IL LL LL, IL w LL Q ��. M N N to rn N N N N y U i Q O O O C9 O O 10 CO w CO 1j` c0 I� CO O N O O W / .�' Z -j O r n 4) � IA N ID Lu 100'0L � z w %.. Uz O i � w-i o j d Q m I o�co w F- O C4 \ \', \'\ \ Z ' JQ ' U Y z o Qc~n,� G G G G G 2 ti 2 t� a JX 0 m m m m m m a d�< �w �w r ,^ N N � I I , N I J m `i � amoo) Z8l tiZ Z 8Z �- p 3 I -- a. O 00 / w - r I C _ I i3O Z f- ; L L1_ X a- 'd w J Lr)' 0o 2 1os�ts o L.w pn �z z�• o1q�V1 C) o� I o 1 E w I _ ' V CD 0 V!LLJ �J I r Z 1 O LLJ U , . i LIJ IN w , > _ . z e�y • Lv`o ,� p c� 4, x M w . - I 66'9K L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 3nN3AV k3831NON 1 1JHOEJV 3H1 �d01N3SN00 N3111UM.. IHi inmwm o3smosia HO a3Sf1 'a3MI-Idf10. 38 10N AVW 3WVS 3H1 aNV 10311H38V 3H1 d0 AlIOM a3HSI-)SndNn ONV 1VNI°JIHO 3HI 3MUIISN00N131vpH ONIHV3d"-,' U31VW N3111�IM ONV SONIMVIiq llV I'd r } I NVI J 01d` lLL8-SZ£ (649) ZSZZZ66' WO` 'SJNIddS WIVd 3AI80 N6ANVO WIVd Milo§ 699 NOlim'Luo uolp 1N3W39d'NVW H3AUV* ' VIPHOJIWO, '1113S3a WIVd AaaajuoW 91i ezeld -A •Jms ` NVId 311S. AHVNIW113lid F �- + I o w ; J i W U) Ld U ' Z w PL W LI_ w th :81BOS OLbbO 'V*I*V [z1IMOJoH .H 1JagJaH :81ea LSbb� d'Iad L1soJlueme-1 •g Jeoso :IenoJddd 0909-9bZ (818) :IenoJddy LOU6 BIUJoPlea [alepualJ :Pa)ioaya PJenalnog AJO131A EM :uMeJa f� I yIg Ob-01-v S31lfl1OOSSV $ ZIlIMOHOH/1SOHZIN34131 92l—k :'ON qor :uolslASEI :018(l S11:)3i.IHDHV Awaluon as ezeld - A °Ja18 Nbf7d GNIJ.NVld rz -� — rz 3 �-O 4 ''' O Zr4 �iIL_ ar N _ dT�Q z V7_ bill �T It 0 1�1�1�1■ 3ni'Ma 1N1111_111/Iv =P o i 2 , 1 + a — I ■�1► `- I r- 3 v� .�- ���3 � �a � � n LZ IV J I V v9 a aL .a ' _ e SLF- o�o F 2 Q w ¢ 2 J 4 U _1 T } O h C Ie-• _ j W 2 Q F u 2 J \ V O N F O W N? r Z - Z 4 U N W J W 1 A J ¢ O2' W Q < Q F > 1 m N W � ❑ > W - Q J❑ S Q (C I Y N I L 0 3 In Q Q uL Z U u W 4 p z a N - N -s w❑ u IY Q Z w u I w IY LLI Q W U' V Lu U Q W J m W Z L ❑ ❑ F E- J m Q Y LJ O W U =LL p- m 6 J Q W6. Q J Z U n' Q v n S Q J d Q Q W LL O u u w m Q Iz J L z z m Ali •g/ I < a , o oHw z pzw o f Q w o iv p Z 2 m vl O J p E w w < V F 2 V. V t� I i W 0 0- W 'A< 2' H = W❑ J W> 1- Q a 0-LAzz Q > It. L _ - Q Q 0 ❑ J - w E Q 2 L X❑ O W w Q Z U O X w K N IL f W W W J J 0 i U Q Q W W F In F W O O W Q Q ¢ F In F W Vf W K F- F J V U 0, 00 In 0 z 0 3 Q �( ¢¢ 0 F I- L J F J a - W W U -• W J W W W In O O 2• L' O R->� Q V1 l F- m L W 7 F w S W ❑� �o d ❑ ¢ 1-❑ Z a 1- In VJ m Z Q W J m¢ Q ' Ian Q O J n O O J m O O p � z p V r� •V - J -' Q-I J Q W N U R F- F O U [/\ U m m 3 U W VI W flJ (�f In m o S w L w ¢ a Q H Q z _ (u�J w❑ r a �s Qt- n Z Q U=� W QN K Q mO `J 2 F O L N m Z N p m X- U W I- W I, LU ! \ (yl LU ❑ E F w 4' U K W > _V J ¢ Q w V Q 1- J LL O O H N W J ~ Z \/ > 10 - X w 2• m U .0 H H X J i x• V YO t J❑ W -Q L -• ❑ O L� R' IL [� O IL 2' J lL Z J O �l Z OIL J Q W J 2 W J u _ p Q L J i h J Q J F F Q 4' Q I- J H U ^ O Q 7 Z L I- t- h- L❑ 2 H .YI . • J J H W Q �J' VI F Vl u Z U' i lW J p J V L J z O.It. Q • .'may J Vf r Q Q Q F 2 J. 2 O J Q i Q U O "• ry rn r •n •a n m m M cu .. o L! o o h•,HF 00000 WI%rz W W I4 IJ :S - N lJ W OIIL IZ Lv mJm % V N c G J a VI N c- Y.Y. Y. K l9JJ JJ J W - w ri JJJ J .JJ J 00 JJJ JJJJJJJJ TJ.rJ J W W W-W rn rtJ IL-iCO.) ^'iG'6 �J w Uuu V V u u KK KKKKT TT K Ku Tu K KT. T. T.T. nn X'I:, c- Li- rN-r - ly - p•[ W•JJ J U 00�00 Y•a r/I rl. In In I/\ • W fl N -L "t K K V: R' S' 1' T rn r. �. I/1 - - VI VJ - .�^ -, ... Ur -+ .0 .-• ('� rJ .-..-. (`�I Vl -. .n IIn rn rn JI rrJ rI1 N In rn - I,- IV U V - W la. :+. L. W L. 4I Q. O'. C .0 O• rn G. S i G rn •n O Vf rF+ W G - 1.1 fL UI Li W } -1 C }n Tr. r• ron v 9n!•- m rn rl n Onn T•nT C-t N r.l rl r^ .r r n I•l IA rl (`I m r n f'1 ^ •[! . ` J J K W Iv O VI 1•J G n n F W W r I is 0. J C C+G K J U } wla- - _ N rc �In G - •f %: V O K F C:: W l.. J W 6. 4 4 f J i % T. %: rn u u u L,. In W U J- � p, LL VI J G U W r�yJ K -f '!. W J W W n• r /: IJ N � 4. . dam U K F x O w .-- G IL W rc1.IJ *� �W'/r-K d•'rc KL] OVIO UKK d.W � f. rK�,q !KW ..: .. � ,•, li p h. Z r I O p W J F 4 O!_ V>'� F .I :- o i " I I - .. ]; lal :.: H LI .. ~ r_l. u = W I] •U-r I+• W 4 J K W p S W } In W T, O ",., a.. J % 'l!. •! lal VI I._ Ui � � n - r-. •f T - 4 li T % K J H r..l 1- V IJ m } S O -6 rti 1-I J C-.F .0 p, �, N rV T J V V I K K I n J O o! I L G J[ . t 0 O �� - -. I LLI V' f- W O Lr T •< W W :S : L• I I I- . Y W C O L W . 4_ -,• L l i - 1 1� • r C. rP L] O fl w • n l V l i. [] i. K U U U Li U Gl O W LL U I-• '. z• '1 ' JI Q tt "'. [.�_ J i (J l� I , l L� 1- W .- G W. K- _ rr • IJ �- r - Ly - 1- L t•r G % LJ _ L- _W_ Z I.J •r 0.' K W — VI F W K ✓1 m - V J !�{ :1'. 1- _� fT T W La: W N J W G O W K K •--'/ w Ul L LJ tv :: m Lt W W W r-+ 4 N O J F T K - _ W r-r % - la. - 2 G •w YJ K w VI ml tv 1-- V F ._l : .W-I J r J H L. •f. F F rr J - K L. h- •f K ❑ -/f _ W L+- t!1 •-r y la. t/1 K K 7 i K p r i- K . ' W c W •-• m U J< W W W In O tJ % 0. K ..- / i 0. W J W> H! •r. !r _ J F- M Y-• K i - f1 i -f '- •Jn .. K :. [] U 4 F. � v 4 1- 4 1! rl: W i G �• ., W W n. L tti <U _ lI IJ T - /. •f (L .-• lJ l .• % J Ll (a] UI t/' 1- O VI [- + [C t: W K OC L• 0. W •-+ fr. CI O U ti p p Y J fr- ., J W .. - F S 4 W lJ -. J F• F- - ..� lJ 4 r•.. 1/1 fO s _ - ' L•. LJ o. hll W _ IY. IV W 4 U. L _ - LJ W r J .i, "[ q K K O .. !�. IQ t, I...-• K - r-• J /. Y - - - l/1 •+ •- C] F "!. - !r.- ' li ' r .- � < W � VI S C Z _ V U K V). •� •f K K F [p G _. Vr U 3- K L. H . rr L: [C O % Ur V LJr / f - V U � N N to F LK � J h i ._ •JI L1 W �[ •� W l -_ IL L. 0. K r 'l 3 [- L -• .. r J r K l-i [� r. S J-i V L�`- • (7 O O R / r L LJ L. 1. - , . .. [" LI C ' ., •J. LJ K 1 .:L In r :f � $ 1 f 1 r F .. _ - .. ✓ru+rc u V Vt3 SJ- J .9 p .n ❑ z � ❑ 4 z > z w O .0. z x .a 99 V W F L[W7� O 3 E-Z.y o L z In ❑ S L to H w W W 2. U h G H pp u ❑ q Q W F CA 11 4 S ❑ Y O 4 w LC 0 O z E.W. I [[I Fu J O a W 0 Q la1J i ttX L� L I��lm.tNil W Coq :C O F r O - w X w W ❑ F z 5z •Cl u to H S 3 H F .Fr WE- E- U x Q TV W q QQ m O t ! tK 4 0 E- E W H � ❑ In � W W Q IX J x C qq� W W m z W 4 W w W [>: W H m W u In O O F O w O C urn a W 3 rJ IJ J .] Ci Q w O a 3 > ro In z a; U •t, U U 2 4 4 lL at .J J O H >• .Q+ ! OO ❑'L z In � Ow W E-,W o V 4 w �a 0: Q w O z SIn H m ❑> F x m a a w x HIn U1 W v E4 In 4 O 'L O p p• Q G W .] F In IZ F .7 F 7 11 H W V 4 W In Op •= O O W V a J I> -I L.Y� z - Q O O L.F. t H S JF qU O F F. W 2 W til � L"O Q C w z S H. VJ O IY • In 4 w q z K F W U -+ O0 In F ❑ H 04 c r. J 4 E W H F r+U¢ ".; �w LJ W O > F Fw O W n .W M a •C LI: tJx MO .F. W5 _ ❑ ❑ •C w O z K z 4 O l UIn z In O w d F m 4 = 4 w O a V a m O n qq WQ a ..LJ a0 a❑ qzW q q 4 o IY W Vs I.'IK ¢H 3 In O In Q 4 F W O [Uil I) Hw an+ z � zaWma LQxJ.K '�❑ In ~ Q F C F OQ W F Q z a i w J >• w gym] N i' ❑ z W .1 u 0,0 H z T� F— FW IY x C 1n 3 W S .Cm wt. H H0 W u 4pp L'J❑ a a" E. H In U U F Z Q .1 z W 4J E� 3 V V W In H U W H❑ W E., F. w'L WL� z >z- 'L mH ❑H C' F. ..0 W w V 4 Ix q w> W> F. In •Q ..(( L O J rj W❑ _7 24 S 4 W V 4 a'z OK 4H 8 a� H £ 4 mIN,r N Ix, 1-m 3NIIHD1HW r. I�I�Id"IIlk IN 1.3311HOHY 3H1 jO 1N3SNOO N3111MM 3H1 ino"M O3SOlJSla HO 03Sf1 •031VJIldna 38 lON AM 3WVS 3141 ONV 1J311HOHV 3H1 10 MtloM 03HSIlandNn ONV WNI9IH0-3H1 31[U[-LSNOJ N1383H DN18V3ddY IV1831VVJ N3111HM ONV SONIMVBa llY NAAOHS SV:oleaS Evvo 'd'I'd 'ZIIMwoH •H j3ag3aH 0664 '6 NVr:eiea L9dtio 'b'l-d '1604uap101 '3 Je360 :lenaddd 0909-9vz (m) :lenoaddd 'e d o CA01,17 lM6 e1u.10l11e3 olepualo :paM3843 H'G ob'9I �PA pJenalnoe tio331A EE8l WON :uMeja _gr.,,-,- S3IVIOOSS\/ '8 Z11MOaOH/1SOtlJN3Q131 M-69 :'ON qor :uoISIAaa :alep S10311HDtIV 4L18-SZ6 (M) UZZ6 do 'SONIddS WlVd 3AIda NaANVO Wldd HaOS 8SS WOO 1N3W30VNVW a3AM �i � L V C ._1 LI\ 1� a) _l F1 y 1� `�1—�7 lT �r r II II II 1 tl ` i 5 IlI • � .�..�� It- i V- L c - k -- - -- l _� I _ .�I ti C_ J I >I j r � ' •c v I ca kA -- - _ 71 —LU- I � xJ II } W N 20 r i \ I '1331.IHOUY 3H1 401N3SN00 N311RtM 3W 1fIpWM 03SO10S10 HO 035� (13iVJi 1c; D 3V iUt; AVW "aWYS 3 1 ONV 11311HJUV 3H1 'O -'1GY C:31:511Pr1..IN JW IVk,- 3�%'T''9_41y lySAlpJ H13tl3H `JNIkltl 3ddY T1W31YW N3111tlM (]Ntl SON/MYW llV vL i Rt- LFv I Z D 0 SZZt 9kC • 09LZ6 VD-DJ353® wivd • v 3iins • 03svd 13 096 CL• , °V®I°V .L 3 1 I H 3 11 V S31vi JOS S V v 9Nfl Sri ON °X Ully mlilaff E i Izo —4- - — 4�1 C1 CI oo/tG'5� a, t1� WF U s 'oS � J a �!T Zc � / Z Q o "a tLt9-s& af�tS-D��letstp , F,�61P* BLLt8 YJ d8V!? NV9 'CA18 BYUM Svi °M Ott N011VU0003 1NMUD'VNIM 83AUVOmd0 1N3W�d41HA3G 11 ie� ASa�M,LIVOW. gA 'brZt�/"1ai '- it ,W 170 I r c� , Eli IL ti 00 IL 9 ffl 14- a8 QD 2 3 F - P- i LL -Li LL r U _y +v UnU rV� m ;S `r X avf LL OU V -r O � N 0 o r w © F_ CO c, r �I 4 L � � U J � J O V ti I 1-3 - 6 2 ums 0'rr 2 PC i, i 1 i I>a C. J —1 CU 'C k W lo 6 9 - h. iV y VJ O T- q r_ n 11 j4 1 I l i - m 71 N 0 4' Z r O > D 4 cn z l^. in C: ° O � U h 0 m t rur v es a cO oP a 7® w GAO _O \ 9GD 3C _ g _ it/rv/] 1d353O XWd AllJ SZUY/' Sl/rv17 39YH/N aM.].vYb All, /3N/] NO'.J�S _JgVy Al/: