The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About194C CG DUNHAM_� FM ..�-' '� -. O�I07 Old pzUR DSO[ 7 ,65 273 Pm a tlY ftaT O mag PndmID B®e®mtt, C-8.2=80 FORW a. DESIGN REVIE."01 3JARt dsp& tmm®umi ®4 snw1ronmm®uott�d ®m<vdc�� o ppffinwdng ¢9dndad®ao 49 REOUEST� (Describe specific nature of approval PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING b — 6 (? r Tels one p- Property Owner Authorization The undersigned states tot they an the owner (s) of the properly described herein and hereby give author- ization far the filing of this apptieatlon. i nature Date Agreement obsotving the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities reiattve to any deed restrlatlons. DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENy� Absotw tie City of Polm Desert of oil hilbilitles regarding any deed restrictions 10 / I that may be aDdicaDN b the property described herein. Applicant's Signature FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Accepted by: VASE Hoo Reference -ose No. Date /),-/L - a3 'Date CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review Of: CASE NO. ype of Project pIican Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. Al At xistin electrical distribution lines, telephone, c telev sion, and similar service wires or cables, w int to and provide service to the property being v1 e installed underground as a part of development ot i ting pole not on the property being developed a n opal Code. �u'31 (Date) Department of Environmental Services Form la ARCHITECURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 8, 1983 IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. Case No. 159 C - T.G.I. Friday's Restaurant Awnings: Commissioner Holden asked that staff find out why the T.G.I. Friday's Restaurant awnings were not enclosed on the ends as required. Mr. Diaz replied that staff would look into the matter and it would be corrected. 2. Case No. 194 C - Dunham Remodel: Commissioner Holden was concerned with the wagon wheel molding on the fascia. He indicated that it was supposed to allow light through the sidewalk below and it is merely a molded pattern. Mr. Diaz indicated that staff would look into this matter. 3. Case No. 166 C - Bullocks Department Store: Commissioner Holden asked if the commission had approved the aqua colored sign and asked why they had not placed the Indian motif usually used on the Bullocks store. Mr. Diaz indicated that it was Bullock's decision to delete the Indian motif and staff felt it was a minor modification and approved it. 4. City Information Center Building: Mr. Diaz reviewed the revised plans with the commissioners and it was the concensus that the entire building should be resubmitted because of the major changes involved. V. ADJOURNMENT: /pa The meeting was adjourned at 3:30 P.M. -5- SS V�sso iate Planner POST OFFICE BOX 1977, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 August 26, 1983 ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE ACTION CASE NO: 194 C APPLICANT: C.G. DUNHAM DEVELOPMENT, 73-725 El Paseo, Suite 21 A, Palm Desert. NATURE OF PROJECT: Request for approval of a remodel of an existing commercial complex. LOCATION: 73-080 and 73-100 El Paseo. ZONE: C-1, S.P. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural committee approved the preliminary plans for the remodel of an existing commercial complex. Date of Action: August 23, 1983 Vote: 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please see attached minutes. A �I ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION AUGUST 23, 1983 B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 194 C APPLICANT/ADDRESS: C.G. Dunham Development, 73-725 El Paseo, Suite 21 A, Palm Desert NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Remodel of existing commercial complex. LOCATION: 73-080 and 73-100 El Paseo. ZONE:C-1, S.P. Mr. Smith indicated that this application was for a remodel which would include changing the roof from the existing flat tile to mission clay tile, the support posts of the roof overhang would be changed from stucco to brick and the exposed gable roof ends would be changed to include a glass window. Mr. Curt Dunham, indicated that the changes would be a real asset to the city. On a motion by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook, the preliminary plans for the remodel of the existing commercial complex were approved as presented. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. 2. CASE NO: 192 C APPLICANT/ADDRESS: Chester Dorn, 73-242 Joshua Tree, Palm Desert; and, J.P. Construction, Inc., 74-831 Velie Way, Palm Desert NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a retail commercial hardware building. LOCATION: Both sides of Alessandro, 300 feet east of Portola. ZONE:C-1 S.P. and R-3 (4) Mr. Smith outlined the proposal for the construction of the new Ace Hardware store to be located on the property adjacent to its existing location on the north Frontage Road. The commissioners in reviewing the plans at study session were concerned as to the actual height of the parapet walls and their ability to adequately screen any roof -top equipment. Mr. Svende Peulique representing the applicant, assured the commission that the roof -mounted equipment would not be visible. At this time the actual requirements in the way of roof -mounted equipment have not been determined; however, there is sufficient flexibility to provide whatever is necessary. On a motion by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook, the preliminary plans were approved as submitted and subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Motion carried unanimously 4-0. V. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 3.10 P.M. - 4 - S E S1 MITH, Associate Pffnner AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-1 DATE: August 23, 1983 ARCHITECTURAL CASE NO: 194 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): C.G. DUNHAM DEVELOPMENT, 73-725 El Paseo, Ste. 21 "A", Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Remodel of existing commercial complex. LOCATION: 73-080 and 73-100 El Paseo. ZONE: C-1, S.P. The subject buildings are located on the north side of El Paseo immediately east of Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan and across El Paseo from the Galleria. The buildings were units 113" and 114" of the Hughes Investments Development. The proposed changes include: 1. Changing the roof from the existing flat tile to mission clay tile to match the roof of Fidelity Federal. 2. The support posts of the roof overhang will be changed from stucco to brick. 3. Arches will be installed between the support columns. Light fixtures will be mounted on the outside face of the arches. 4. Exposed gable roof ends will be changed to include a semicircular architectural feature. CONCLUSION: The changes proposed for the existing building which was built in 1979-1980 are essentially cosmetic and will not result in additional floor area to the buildings. RECOMMENDATION: That the commission review the plans for Case No. 194 C for changes to the exterior of 73-080 and 73-100 El Paseo, to determine acceptability. /pa F * r ; �., N �., 1 45 275 rIr6ek0y Pser Lane, Padmm D"wu, Ca.9228® �.WF DEMIGN REVIEW BOARD QPPUCA700H FORK: ad®partmmmad ®B onvironmmented servDim" a p0ann Ing adMalan a Lam. � vl►�-.arm 0 REQUEST! (Describe specific nature of approval requested). J?&-vwod&L,t N L ----73 / 00 Et, PA`5eo ;ai*11;. J a161111k,xh: - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 3 Y6 -06 0 •lepllons z�-tRL-o37 � 61z7-I�iz'ol4 EXISTING ZONING G--� slates that they are the owner (U of the property rim autbor- 'I DO BY MY SIGNATURE AG ENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any dead restrictions Mat may be applicable to the property described MrM s /. �� .. Sianaturo Date Applicants Signature ( FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Emironmas I Status ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other U /O Da (r?iAccepy ted b= �- 5 V�+/ SIE .M0, l q �1 Reference Case No. e . � 1R Iqd jQ A.V5 (n aS 1YL.N3WN0211AIM CA test a randvc �:+� ♦mil G Rr= �: �.. . z _ Cj1 Lv I I M 1 ' l �50A1 I a T-I1.TOLI t �( u T PI T n(I 1 1 r z Z - F O N N. IsL'a 0 CFO� SSiOC .- �ii Aw-I I fp:(T PAIL 11 It YTX A I A & AnS, �J� F:pI�ItI�YM F.]TAL � Nti!!ISA6T�. L\t' 1157 COL NUN ST., SAIN I)IECIO, CA 92101 (711-3525 Z'MEN MNm%rI31SL4::02%TM3EMlW MA COlV':5iTJLZ' �I CHECKED IDRAWN QREVI6ION ARCHIT8IG'I' Q SNC3ZNEER JOB I t 17 h1 4' �} ''I� t; r .L•G, (?1/KC ' y,=) IBC::- ` `;r.� r� C �_.. :c_ i' "w'N1E t h't��ti1l Gi1Gr_� �h-� Ctl�f✓� �. �� U=��f-=( F ;y.c_:°�A�- �.- i r CONCEPT CclJ'AbIZICATION X======, . mNNENTs -�� - TM-E This is an exclusive design not John Howejoine Inc. to be duplicated or displayed without �� DATE LOCATION written authorization of John Howenstine Inc. s"fWA" '71A q_'-_AL_jF._j__-__. DWG NO.y_ SHEET NO SCALE REVISION NO ,- DATE _. .. - ""S'TwT; ,,71 TkG`P!!Ee+`%.4` ''?t :�" '�.`6'.•ZT.,'__ � i )A ' CITY OF PAUl j SERT� DI A1TFENT OFE rr C¢pp 4 i APPROVED ElC.C. F2SS, P70 4�. 'k r;-.. .:,.,. ,_...:..,,:. .;t: ':- :.r•.:. 9 .- .. _ El P.c. PC �.FO. TAFFCTTER I ' � L f O.R_S. ACTION FORM 6 1 Y _ Cowsrr,UCT10H 'Au. - Date — - ONE re=r-TT;lCe snrr u -�'+lxe��iY.^'rt=. 4+i1��.u...d.._/� Y �_�...-!.'."�'_ / M�.. _,.f"`_�%!F �•Y,aNiei a. i✓� T '� - i..H.� : , .. 'J.-tom .« •_.. ': Y-, n:.e. .,.- _'N M1:. :�- - �� EPT is F tt3RATION This H an exwi o6gn - rot - he duplkated w _Dpleyed ftW v� h r prtk euaeoPss7ton o1 J:V�n Flovvavtlne Inc "-.r.�.-,�.�. . �,: 1U.t'W111 ,;'ri�Ur ' Coln � ,��, .