The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About205C RUSSELL AND KOENEN TRUST SECO LANEMarch 6, 1985 Mr. Ed Mark Industrial West 74-947 Highway 111 Indian Wells, CA 92260 RE: Lots 6, 7, 8, Tract 13,236 Palm Desert, CA Dear Ed; I have reviewed your client's concern about the overall aesthetic appearance of the planting area adjacent to Seco Lane. Please find the following my considerations regarding planting the 10' wide strip along Seco Lane to grass in lieu of e*r gazania: 1. I tend to agree that the grass would present a more manicured and rich appearance throughout the year even though in the long term it would represent 3 greater maintenance costs. 2. The trees as shown on our plan.dated 3/20/84 should still be planted as shown and I feel it important that the parking stall fingers be planted to Raphio- lepis, Agapanthus, Gazania and Jacaranda as shown on the plan. 3. The irrigation system would need to be modified so that the two valves that are shown as shrub head stations would be grass stations (and all heads of course to be flush mounted grass heads). If you have any further questions regarding the above, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Waynronnor, ASLA Wayn Connor, & Associates WCC/jhr MY OF PALM DESERT GEPARTUENT OF APPROV-aD EY. ❑ c.C.I3m. NO. ❑ P.C.RES.NO. ❑ STAFF LETTER �% ❑ D.R.9. ACTION FORM Dot* CONgT.'.tF :.0. 8t{ALL COMMENCE e{THUI 092 YEAR. OF TNI3 APPROVAL. June 28, 1984 Gf1{t� oil nDffijLn 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 205 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RUSSELL AND KOENEN TRUST, P.O. Box 2056, Palm Desert, CA 92261. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a multitenant industrial building. LOCATION: South side of Seco Lane in Palm Desert Business Park. ZONE: S.I. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission moved to approve this case by minute motion. Date of Action: June 26, 1984 Vote: 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Minutes are attached. I. IL MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY - JUNE 26, 1984 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE The meeting was called to order at 2:03 p.m. after a one hour study session. Members Present: Members Absent: Staff Present: Al Cook Ron Gregory Rick Holden Charlie Martin Bernie Leung Ray Diaz Steve Smith Tonya Monroe Moved by Commissioner Martin, Seconded by Commissioner Cook, to approve the minutes for the meeting of June 12, 1984, as submitted. Motion carried 2-0-2. Moved by Commissioner Holden, Seconded by Commissioner Martin, to approve the following cases by minute motion: 1. CASE NO: 188 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PACIFIC COAST BUILDERS, INC., 1631 E. 18th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701; COACHELLA VALLEY STEEL AND SUPPLY INC., P.O. Drawer ZZZ, Indio, CA 92202. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of plans for maintenance building structure. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Cook Street and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PR-3, S.P. Approval is subject to the following condition: 1. Evaporative coolers either be removed from roof or adequately screened. 2. CASE NO: 224 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): COJFVBIA CENTER, R.H. RICCIARDI, 45- 275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Deser C 60. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL S� minary and final approval of plans in a 8000 square foot retail builds LOCATION: Columbia Center, west side of Highw 746 bei een Highway I I I and El Paseo. Bf ZONE: P.C. 3 (S.P.) RF�Zsl y To 3. CASE NO: 205 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RUSSELL AND KOENEN TRUST, P.O. Box 2056, Palm Desert, CA 92261. PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 26, 1984 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a multitenant industrial building. LOCATION: South side of Seco Lane in Palm Desert Business Park. ZONE: S.I. The minute motion on these cases was approved 4-0. M. CASES: A. Final drawings: I. CASE NO: 223 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. • o S!j RFC' r nFeo,,'_TO MR. GARY SCHRAMM, 73-098'fiighway NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of elevation change to Branding Iron. LOCATION: North side Highway 111, east of Monterey. ZONE: C-1, S.P. Mr. Smith explained that during study session, the commission reviewed the request for approval of an elevation change to the Branding Iron. He indicated that the owner's intent was to create an Tyrolean -type exterior. Chairman Gregory explained to the applicant that there were two main concerns expressed by the commission during study session. 1) The Tyrolean style does not reflect the environment of the desert; and 2) The structure on top of the roof gives a stage type of facade. Mr. Gary Schramm was present and explained to the commission that he would like to make the building look good. Commissioner Holden indicated that the roof structure from the side view would show that it didn't extend over the entire length of the building. Chairman Gregory asked the applicant if he could try to be more in keeping with the desert environment. Mr. Schramm indicated that he would like to keep a European style. Commissioner Martin read a section of the zoning ordinance that indicated that it is the commission's job to review the architecture of proposed buildings to insure unity in the surrounding environment. Mr. Diaz explained that the commission looks at compatibility, as opposed to identical. Mr. Smith explained to the applicant that if he wished to leave his plans the way they are and the commission denied the request, he could appeal to the city council. -2- Gt:a�J�r off 11nlxa =C�D=cl:vtro POST OFFICE BOX 1977, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92261 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 28, 1983 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 205 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RUSSELL AND KOENEN TRUST, P.O. Box 2056, Palm Desert, CA 92261. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a multitenant industrial building. LOCATION: South side of Seco Lane in Palm Desert Business Park. ZONE: S.I. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission approved the preliminary plans subject to conditions. Date of Action: November 22, 1983 Vote: 3-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. Il. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY - NOVEMBER 22, 1983 2:00 P.M. ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE The meeting was called to order at 2:05 P.M. after a one hour and five minute study session. Members Present: Members Absent: Staff Present: Al Cook Rick Holden Charlie Martin Ron Gregory Bernie Leung Ramon A. Diaz Steve Smith Patricia Armitage Upon motion by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Holden, the minutes of the November 8, 1983 meeting were approved as written. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. It was moved by Commissioner Cook and seconded by Commissioner Holden to approve the following cases by minute motion: 1. CASE NO: 192 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CHESTER DORN, 73-242 Joshua Tree, Palm Desert, CA 92260 and J.P. CONSTRUCTION, INC., 74-831 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a retail commercial hardware building. LOCATION: Both sides of Alessandro, 300 feet east of Portola. ZONE: C-1, S.P. and R-3 (4). Final approval of plans for the retail commercial hardware building was granted subject to the following conditions: 1. That a separate sign approval by the commission shall be obtained prior to installation of signs. 2. That the storage area shall be screened by a six foot masonry or concrete wall. 3. Windows shall be placed to line up with the band. 2. CASE NO: 882 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PALM DESERT NATIONAL BANK, 73-745 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of a sign program for a new bank location. -1- ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1983 CASE NO. 882 SA (CONTINUED) LOCATION: Former Barclay's Bank, southwest corner of El Paseo and San Luis Rey. ZONE: C-1, S.P. The sign program was approved as submitted. 3. CASE NO: 206 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SIGNATURES, 73-912 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Request for approval of awning extension from building face to curbline to also include signage. LOCATION: 73-912 El Paseo, North side of El Paseo. ZONE: C-1, S.P. The awning extension from the building face to the curbline including the signage was approved as submitted. 4. CASE NO: 204 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RUSSELL AND KOENEN TRUST, P.O. Box 2056, Palm Desert, CA 92261. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 7830 square foot multitenant industrial building. LOCATION: East side of Beacon Hill in Palm Desert Business Park. ZONE: S.I. The preliminary plans were granted approval subject to the following conditions as listed in the staff report: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the city fire marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. -2- ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 1983 5. CASE NO: 205 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RUSSELL AND KOENEN TRUST, P.O. Box 2056, Palm Desert, CA 92261. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a multitenant industrial building. LOCATION: South side of Seco Lane in Palm Desert Business Park. ZONE: S.I. The preliminary plans for a multitenant industrial building were approved subject to the following conditions as listed in the staff report and added Condition No. 3: I. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the city fire marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. Total driveway width to be constructed at this time. The minute motion on all of the cases listed above carried unanimously 3-0. III. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: 159 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): T.G.I. FRIDAY'S, P.O. Box 400329 Midway Road, Dallas, Texas 75240. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of a freestanding monument sign. LOCATION: Palms to Pines West, Phase II ZONE: PC(3), S.P. On a motion by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook, the request for approval of a freestanding monument sign was continued. Motion carried unanimously 3-0. B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 240 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BILL ROSSWORN, 73-941 Highway 111, Suite 5, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a triplex. - 3 - AGENDA rTEM NO: III-B-3 DATE: November 22, 1983 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 205 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RUSSELL AND KOENEN TRUST, P.O. Box 2056, Palm Desert, CA 92261. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a multitenant industrial building. LOCATION: South side of Seco Lane in Palm Desert Business Park. ZONE: S.I. BACKGROUND: The applicant has filed other required applications to consolidate three lots into one and for the precise plan review. Consolidation of the lots will provide for the more efficient use of the land. ELEVATIONS: One single story building, 16 feet in height is proposed. The walls will be concrete or masonry (tan). The units will have bronze aluminum storefronts. A blue Spanish tile covered roof structure extends out over the entries. The rear will have overhead entry doors for each of the ten units. LANDSCAPING: A detailed landscape plan has been provided. The materials to be installed appear acceptable as do their sizes (15 gallon and 24 inch box). In addition to the perimeter street planting, four (4) entry planter areas are proposed in front of the unit entries. A six foot block wall is shown on the rear property line. CONCERNS: The applicant indicates that the access driveways at each end will be shared with the adjacent lot and thereby provide the required 24 foot width. This is acceptable provided the necessary easements are granted and these will be required through the precise plan review. The preliminary plans have not addressed the issue of signs, this should be done soon so that the design of the building can incorporate an acceptable sign program. Trash containers are delineated in the rear access driveway. Adequate protection should protect the containers from vehicles. RECOMMENDATION: That the plans for Case No. 205 C be given preliminary approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the city fire marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. /pa CN7Y "'F pALH DD ESER"" 46 275 1 ...At Pear LanoN PeOm De"r.., .;&2226® f-ai hI Ill N i DIESIGN Rl,.:V! �W BOARD UPUCQ't7 W PORN: dmpartmm®nflst al a MmIDnMsn W well:" a p0awnnen g die adore a Samuel I. Russell & Philip Koenen Trust Apiskant (please pint) P.O. Box 2056 568-0351 Molling Address Telephone Palm Desert, CA 92261 pry StanZip-Cods REQUEST! (Describe aperdflC nature of aptxovaf repueaad). *p 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 634020005-0; 634020006-1; 634020007-2 EXISTING ZONING "—T- CBWCF- %Hmsm k` Property Owner Authomatlon The unasrslpmd states Mot they are the owner W of the property described herein and hereby give author- ization for the filing of ties oppk ion. ��—Signature Z Date Agreement obsolvMg the CIty of Palm Desert of all liabilities rNpNw to any deed restrictions. -1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Decent of all liabilities regarding any deed rsstrlcftons 1�1 MW may be applicable to the property described Main. Applicants Signature a R TAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Accepted by, Reference Cc" No. Daft CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review Of: CASE NO. Industrial (Type of Project) Samuel I. Ru 1 P ili Koenen Trust pp scant Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed as required by /Municipal Code. ignat re to Department of Environmental Services Form la I� � Sz zlk v II• U L Z UQ Q� �[i9Z IbO o00N c�I�I N I Q i V7, i{J N I I ,finn lIL N �N O I I IL t Q ` - l= N -Y MF�-L-) 0LMz - ' X -- - N_ 0 NILI I O 0 o SPIP La f'j G3 y,i L. IL A•J� kA � '0 0 C_a bd 1 I I _ I U I � Y f N N I N L m r U N I o r I o w O m t I N N O - 'I - C m � I ❑ 1 -e- •� N N 3 1 ¢, u.1 it N 111 N W I b N Y u u m 0 1 L .0 Ul T m m Y . 1 lb w .-, U a a- 1 — i N m ^ •. -4 1 I fa L (1)O r O •� �+ L .. I .+ 1 Q Y .i N d i ❑ Ul 1 ❑ 11 O E I Y I Q 7 0 N N u m Q a ^� Ln N m ❑ r a 11 J3U-0 rin _a I [A N N m -• at m m C i I r IT i U - (a m O LLI ' N W L 3 > ] w [') F ❑ Y L IL U ❑ E ♦+ O 0 a- m ❑ to > a) L (1) L N - O L — ❑ L a UI N -+ E U J r m u D, ❑ c C L -1 ❑. W ❑ ._ ._ (0 W O m m - - -x y E .. UI L L N m 7 (D m m a c L m ar - U N C W - - m ._ - N L U( a N m m — m m v m — O Y y, Y .- Y Y C C N a- J r r al r r J O O 777 09ZZ6 - VINa AIV3 - 1b3S30 WIVd - 018Vd NVS OZI-SV �lJ� ~,� ---•• /� �� — C�1 96b2-Ob£ {6I9) W a d� z '�.I � - 83NNV 1O3L1H Id > ¢ --- - did A�F-1011�1 'S 1�1�8 Obi - a W � = � 0 o 1 m = - �ali-' r I 0 0 0 N 0 I fill S II i I I a FA - 9 i i� y r u ✓ P �9 r m ��s�a w�� g�z�i i�� `z 13 s1o� 09ZZ6 - VIN2iO3IIVO - ib3S30 WIVd - OI9tld hltlS OZI-9b 9W-Ob£ (619) 83NNb-Id 1O31iHOHd = m m w o N N � D�� I LN�7-1cJ (INV N 7 �oo� ��dN � V�l��l-�� VIA3HOsId .S Ig08 a _ �' 0 0 0 m 0 {1I I CD r w , W � W � s o z W �� C7 �c 3 z IL LL 7 tL 0 7. LL L \ L 00 e _ f O J LL 6 � o � QI r Q U v U1 C9 1L' _ (E-) coo coy -- - 060 LL x . . . . . . . . . . . . Ca ❑rd\ ra\fa ura` -------- O m m m m ❑ to m m m m m m m m m m m m — -- N e w m m at ma m m m m m — ❑ 0❑ N❑ 0 ❑ N O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m N m m �' y y y y -D �7 lf1m ID IN 10 W U)N m m m m m- m- m `p- m- m. W ill N .-I .-I ... �. N .-I to In L(l II) N IIJ fIl U) In — N — N '� — N — CJ — N 0)i I f J IP LI) .-� .ti. In In U -.- .-I + W E C L E IL m Y m ._ 10 O W 3 IL c O -O a u 7 c L E-�- m - W — a W m - 1 7 y W ❑ N N W W O W ❑ U1 7 C W L t' C W— T 7 N W m -C -° � m C ❑] m 0] X > 3 m C' 7 CD O C G _ L — m ._ m _ nI m _ _ JL - m > W m 't '- ]— u W W> W m 3 W J. � 3 m W m C C W y�� +�' �\ I W L E v ❑� ❑_ W J— ❑ m y L i i y L W [] U W � ( F. L— N C C 0 O- U "O — m a- W N m G C 2 C ❑ U .- m C 0. _ F v F q +i 0_ 7 C� pi m— N a W C L -U -0 m — 3 >. -- m ❑- ❑. �+ G m _ _ — -_ C _ Y C ❑ — \V u w c v w w y c 0- m m _ ❑ m ^ Nro -- — -- -- — - -- -- z ❑ e u .� x c a v m m v L u - — c 7 c c EL y C a u c m c L N ❑ N _ _ -0 y a L❑ X W m❑ 3 -O L L 1. .t1 � v m u- N m J UI O m m 30 m L pl -- N C W-C O> .- W m m rp W+ O. 3 C m LLL.UJ�Of�� ZUUIF 6❑_I-00 r•-, >.CD CD 0- -u U- U coQ Ul O Q C _1t Z � o z to N j to to m m . c } L m y 3 W m ] 3 W m L m N J. L 7 -, C� — m m __ E O on a 7 L y C S- L J. y — y❑ ] Q - o .nn 2 m T7 W m m 3 ❑_ m S m ._ L} > O 1 ❑7 I- y L ._ ] 3 •1- M X ❑- F- L L L m - y a m W W m u W m V E y y W X m— ❑ E N W u > ul •• to — to ON L IL f: lL LL _Q 2 U u W Q' ❑7 m 7 N L F- E~ L m _ tl —to (D C y m O l] E m f\ z Z L L N N Q a C C J) -I U� W W 7 N .N E 0_ O W � m D N y C � 7 N J a 7 m O❑ (g ._ m E-- L 7 a-- u-+ ._ L ] — _- • UI m J L 01 iti a ❑ W w ,( u a a c 7 ym F N m m 7] 0 0 ❑ a W +' m J > "O m a W u Ln m 7 W ._ L L a L_ m --_ W UI A m W C m m— m C W y E E M m❑ C y E D_ .0 m y m — m m y C .f C W N 7.] ❑ u .- ._ (Jj Ip ._ C u W m m - C C C m ❑- I O I -' - - - ------'----- - ¢ L m — 7 a W ❑1 m m m t -- > U ❑ -0 — 7 -- - " ❑ -C L > ❑ w m — m ❑ W m 7 ❑ m X - u_0 L C m L t y -0 a a W— 7 — % -D : ] C m N y C E m -T II U1 0 -C +' 7 N m m— ❑❑ m 7 -- W W- ❑ O .l C W U U U O l7 � J Z Z d O. X ¢ - COco UO 0_ U Q Q i➢ U' O_ .� U j JLn in w LLIz 07 Z ._J r a. _ 3 Q O'_ 2 •-. U Q W a II- 2 ❑7 2 J� r ❑- F- O O P F .-I 0_ O u7 -. 2 U O_ Ot U O' W J Q (L (n F u U W -]03 i1 W UUu oo9 JZ ZIL d 0_ t--X i 0] U O❑- LO Q Q CD t7 a J J I. I I i I : i l I ja� II I I i f I I z a ` ly IL i — I Q to 1 I ------ ----- �^ it •r. LL LL L �J �.� a 0 0L)C i W z M hLk� � - I I I