Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout230C DANIEL RUSSIELETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ROBERT S. RITCHEY AIA, ARCHITECT 45-120 San Pablo, suite 2D Palm Desert, Ca. 9226❑ (619) 340-2496 TO: CITY OF PALM DESERT DATE:NOVEMBER 16; 1984 JOB NO.: RR8449 ATTENTION:PLANNING DEPT. REGARDINGzALLESANDRO OFFICE BLD'G GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ATTACHED PRINTS FOR YOUR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. item copies date ---------------------- 1 3 11/16 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED no. description COMPLETE SET WORKING DRAWING A-1 tkru A-6r M-1. PE-1e E-1, E-2, P-1, L-1, L-2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- REMARKS ----------------------------------- COPY TO ---------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNED� ROBERT S. RITCHEY MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY - NOVEMBER 27, 1984 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. after a one hour study session. Members Present: Al Cook RoH,Gregory Bernie Leung Charlie Martin Members Absent: Rick Holden Staff Present: Ray Diaz Steve Smith Stan Sawa Donna Gomez Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Leung to approve the minutes for the meeting of November 13, 1984'ias written. Carried 3-0-1 (Commissioner Martin abstaining) II. Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried unanimously 4-0. 1. CASE NO: 230 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DANIEL RUSSIE, 73-780 Grapevine Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; JP CONSTRUCTION, 74-831 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plan two story commercial building. LOCATION: South side of Alessandro Drive, 150 feet east of San Pablo Avenue. ZONE: C-N I. 2. CASE NO: 274 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): WILLIAM SPENCER, P.O. Box 144, Palm Desert, CA 92261 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary architectural appproval of plan for an 8 unit apartment complex. LOCATION: North side Santa Rosa, 300 feet west of San Pascual. ZONE: R-2 Subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction plan shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of con- struction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final land- scaping, grading. lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the design review board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and -: construction shall have been completed. AGENDA ITEM NO: III-A-1 DATE: November 27, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 230 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DANIEL RUSSIE, 73-780 Grapevine Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; JP CONSTRUCTION, 74-831 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plan wo story commercial building. LOCATION: South side of Alessandro Drive, 150 feet east of San Pablo Avenue. ZONE: C-1 BACKGROUND: This request was granted preliminary approval at the meeting of August 28, 1984, subject of providing some additional architectural treatment to the south and east elevations. The applicant has submitted his final working drawings for this project. To satisfy your conditions, the applicant has provided a 2.25 foot wide horizontal contrasting paint band around the second story area on the east and south elevations. Along the north and part of the west elevations at the balcony level, as previously shown, the plans indicate a 6 foot wide vertically fluted band. RECOMMENDATION: The commission should review these plans and determine acceptability. 4��Cvv,, -��5aw-A- Stan B. Sawa SBS/dlg 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 30, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 230 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DANIEL RUSSIE, 73-780 Grapevine Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; JP CONSTRUCTION, 74-831 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plan two story commercial building. LOCATION: South side of Alessandro Drive, 150 feet east of San Pablo Avenue. ZONE: C-1 Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission minute motioned this case. Date of Action: November 27, 1984 Vote: Carried unanimously 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Plese read the attached minutes. : August 28, 1984 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 230 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DANIEL RUSSIE, 73-780 Grapevine Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; J.P. CONSTRUCTION 74-831 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for two story commercial building. LOCATION: South side of Alessandro Drive, 150 feet east of San Pablo Avenue. ZONE: C-1 Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission moved to approve the preliminary plans, subject to the conditions outlined in the attached minutes. Date of Action: August 28, 1984 Vote: 2-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Minytes are_axtached. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION AUGUST 28, 1984 The minute motion on these cases was approved 2-0. III. CASES: A. Final Drawings: None B. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 225 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): FRANK R. GOODMAN do ASSOCIATES, 77-900 Avenue of the States, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 5000 square foot commercial building. LOCATION: North side of Highway 111, 400 feet east of Cabrillo Avenue. ZONE: C-1, S.P. Commission reviewed the plans during study session and expressed concern regarding the similarity of the proposed building to an existing building located 100 feet to the west. After discussion with Mr. Goodman, commission moved to continue this case to the September 11 meeting when a more representative cross section of the commission should be present. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Acting Chairman Martin, to continue this case to the next meeting. Carried 2-0. 2. CASE NO: 230 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DANIEL RUSSIE, 73-780 Grapevine Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; J.P. CONSTRUCTION 74-831 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for two story commercial building. LOCATION: South side of Alessandro Drive, 150 feet east of San Pablo Avenue. ZONE: C-1 Commission indicated that it was concerned with the second story, south elevation. Commission felt that the wall needed some type of detailing treatment (i.e..- paint, roofing, etc.). Moved by Commissioner Holden, Seconded by Acting Chairman Martin, to approve the preliminary plans, with condition. Carried 2-0. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. Show on the working drawings some type of detailing treatment to the south and east elevations. -4- MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION AUGUST 28, 1984 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. CASE NO: 238 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MENNIE W. ABELARDO, 74-360 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval of exterior revisions to commercial building. LOCATION: 74-360 Highway III (north side between Portola and Deep Canyon) ZONE: C-1, S.P. Mr. Smith reviewed the staff report. The commission felt that a change of texture between the stucco walls and the stucco fascia would provide needed relief. In addition, the proposed oleander should be replaced with bougainvillea. Finally, the commission indicated that it was not prepared to review the signs as proposed. Additional more detailed sign plans will be required. In response to a question by the applicant, The commission indicated that a pink neon sign if done properly, could be acceptable. Motion by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Acting Chairman Martin, to grant final approval subject to conditions. Carried 2-0. Approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide a varied texture between the stucco wall and stucco accent band. 2. Landscape plans be revised as noted above. 4. CASE NO: 233 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): WESTAR ASSOCIATES, 4425 Jamboree Road, #130, Newport Beach, CA 92660; McClellan/Cruz/Gaylord and Associates, 1151 Dove Street, #260, Newport Beach, CA 92660, Attn. John Baker. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a commercial shopping center. LOCATION: Between Painters Path and Highway III and El Paseo and the Palm Valley Storm Channel. ZONE: PR-6 S.P. (Change of zone to PC (3) S.P. pending) Representatives from Westar Associates, McClellan/Cruz/Gaylord, and Mervyn's were present. -5- i AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-6 DATE: August 28, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 230 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DANIEL RUSSIE, 73-780 Grapevine Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260; J.P. CONSTRUCTION 74-831 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for two story commercial building. LOCATION: South side of Alessandro Drive, 150 feet east of San Pablo Avenue. ZONE: C-1 BACKGROUND: The planning commission reviewed and approved the precise plan for this case at the meeting of July 3, 1984. The proposal is to build a 5824 square foot commercial building on the east side of the lot with a parking lot on the west side and access to Alessandro Drive and to an alley at the rear. ARCHITECTURE: The architectural style of the structure is somewhat spanish with exterior materials consisting of plain and textured concrete panels, wrought iron railings, bronze glass, wood trim, and concrete tile roofing. Architecturally, staff feels there should be some texture/color treatment to the two story plain walls that run along the east and south property lines. The applicant is proposing to provide a carport type covering over the ten spaces on the west side of the parking lot. The continuous carport would have a corregated metal roof with a wood laminated fascia around it. LANDSCAPING: A preliminary landscaping plan has been submitted for your review. A planning commission condition required a 3.5 foot high wall to screen the parking lot area. This includes the access facing the street and alley and along the west property line. A six foot side walk next to curb is required, but not reflected on the plan. SIGNS: A sign program has not yet been submitted. The final working drawings will have to iclude sign location, design, and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the commission review the plans with consideration given to architectural treatment along the east and south walls and treatment of the screen wall. Should the commission approve the plans, the following conditions should be imposed: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the city fire marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. Case 230 C Continued 3. Screen wall in parking lot to be provided as required by planning commission. 4. The wood fascia on the carports shall extend around all sides. Prepared by: 7Y7 Am Li Z Rwy II! U-1,S.Ph; =P G S E ` 7 G—I f<L os5lo st N PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 10, 1984 Motion by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Leung, to approve the two fascia -mounted signs with the colors as submitted. Carried 3-1 (Commissioner Cook voting nay.) B. Preliminary plans: 1. CASE NO: 228 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MR. & MRS. VICTOR MIHAJSON, 45- 325 Sage Lane, Palm Desert, CA 92260; MR. ANTON BERKET, 38-201 Chuperosa Lane, Cathedral City, CA 92234. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 4000 square foot furniture store. LOCATION: North side of Highway l I (Frontage Road) 80 feet west of Las Palmas Drive. ZONE: C-1, S.P. Mr. Sawa explained that during study session the commission expressed concern regarding the location of the handicapped parking stalls, lack of elevation front and back, and the type of plant materials used. Commissioner Martin indicated that the applicant had received a variance to the front setback requirements. He indicated that he would like to see more undulation on the front elevation. He explained that the parking area is limited and the number of spaces he is allowing is acceptable for a furniture store, but it will always have to be a furniture store. Any other kind of office would require more parking spaces. Mr. Diaz explained that customers would be parking in the rear of the building, so the design is as important in the back, in addition to any traffic on that back street. In regard to the proposed plant materials, Chairman Gregory explained to the applicant that the landscape plans could be improved, using a larger variety of plants and sizes. He explained that some of the proposed Junipers cannot survive in a desert climate. After further discussion, commission indicated that the plans needed further study regarding the aforementioned items. Motion by Commissioner .Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook, to return the plans back to the applicant for restudy. Carried 4-0. Items for restudy: 1. Plant material and sizes. 2. Rear elevation, should be given some design treatment. 3. Front elevation should be restudied. 4. Handicapped stalls to be relocated. 2. CASE NC: 230 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): Street, Palm Desert, 92260; J.P Palm Desert, CA 92260. DANIEL RUSSIE, 73-780 Grapevine CONSTRUCTION 74-831 Velie Way, NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for two story commercial building;. i PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 10, 1984 LOCATION: South side of Alessandro Drive, 150 feet east of San Pablo Avenue. ZONE: C-1 This case was withdrawn by the applicant prior to the meeting. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. Mr. Diaz asked the commission to study a proposed sign for the General Store Museum. The proposed sign would be out of wood, with a yellow background and brown letters. He explained that the museum would charge a minimal fee for admittance, and would be open for tours by the valley schools. Commission expressed concern regarding the sign program previously established by Jet Copy, which utilizes blue and white; however, approved a light yellow background with brown lettering. 2. Mr. Martin requested the opinion of the commission in regard to the Greenhouse Restaurant that was discussed at the previous meeting. He indicated that the outdoor seating enclosure had been eliminated and that the awning would be retained, but with new colors. Commission indicated that the new awning appeared to be acceptable. V. ADJOURNMENT: Am The meeting was adjourned at 3.08 p.m. -4- RAMON A DIIA , Director Department of Environmental Services AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-2 DATE: July 10, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 230 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DANIEL RUSSIE, 73-780 Grapevine Street, Palm Desert, 92260; J.P. CONSTRUCTION 74-831 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for two story commercial building. LOCATION: South side of Alessandro Drive, 150 feet east of San Pablo Avenue. ZONE: C-1 BACKGROUND: The planning commission reviewed and approved the precise plan for this case at the meeting of July 3, 1984. The proposal is to build a 5824 square foot commercial building on the east side of the lot with a parking lot on the west side and access to Alessandro Drive and to an alley at the rear. ARCHITECTURE: The architectural style of the structure is somewhat spanish with exterior materials consisting of plain and textured concrete panels, wrought iron railings, bronze glass, wood trim, and concrete tile roofing. Architecturally, staff feels there should be some texture/color treatment to the two story plain walls that run along the east and south property lines. LANDSCAPING: A preliminary landscaping plan has been submitted for your review. A planning commission condition required a 3.5 foot high wall to screen the parking lot area. This includes the access facing the street and alley and along the west property line. A six foot side walk next to curb is required, but not reflected on the plan. SIGNS: A sign program has not yet been submitted. The final working drawings will have to include sign location, design, and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the commission review the plans with consideration given to architectural treatment along the east and south walls and treatment of the screen wall. Should the comission approve the plans, the following conditions should be imposed: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. Screen wall in parking lot to be provided as required by planning commission. CITY OF PALM DESERT RECEIVED OF: p 42t-v�-16 DATE S a AMOUNT FOR ') -:�o C' CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE 4V F [PGQLN BESER FORK Mo.�� 273 Pulaft0y fteP Lano(iile Paunaa D"er4, Ca.22260 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPUCAiTOOM FORM: department ®4 aanavdnoanmenta0 "Me" o p0aaaainag dg vOedono a Daniel E. Russie Applicant (pinch pint) 73-780 Grapevine Street 568-9451 Mailing Address slsphon* Palm Desert, CA 92260 city State Zip -Cade REOUESTt (Dsscrtps specific nature of approval requested). Commercial Building - two stories - showroom and offices ARTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 15 & 16 MB 023/002 Palm -Village Plaza Tr. - Alessandro Drive between San Pablo and Deanza. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 627-152-004 and 627-152-005 EXISTING ZONING C-1 Property Owner Authorlsatlon The undersigned states that they are the owner (s) of the property described herein and hereby give author- Ization for the filing of this application. DO Ely MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding arty deed restrictions that may be applicable to the property described herein. Applicants Signature FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Exemption ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Accepted by- —7 Reference Case No. Z-3 -'Pf/ Date -3-may Date > m Cc1 ZZb 96bZ-0t£ (619) 04ZZ5 �- liiN2JOjIllt� - 12f3S30 WIVd - -0lBBd N115 OZT-Sb ����rJ<7d V1 -ssn"21 7-1�:t 3 aL, o NvlJai tl-.a�,srlr 4, r :ate I �� �� ww \� 83NNVId iO3ilHOHV dLE✓7� VIV S JLd3cm"lu r /JL'U m N O O m LL O u 0 jtL Si- �l 7 1H a(� 1' � d.x�, W � LL W W J a�p w � fG O:' U U W 'i F J =a a ❑❑❑❑ a:w «� a 'dW LL W® 00 Z W r^ om W O 00 t a m s W LL rt �/y7 Q - d } 'IJ Wes' LL 00 X ;1 i I I I 1 _ Q 09ZZ6 - VIN'dO3IIV0 - i63S30 WIVd - 0 8Vd NVS OZ -Sb 96trZ-OVC (6I9) T- N E ES mL83SOH "m w Z t- ILI I in t- R J a 0 c� z st.. ,t r3 LI 0 U rai I, ra 1, ' ,I m in m m Y Y } I, If in m Ill m in (v N In- In m.. ro 11) ,n ,n a, w N - ❑ N 7 r" _. t. v _ m .- u .. _ no 3 m N m c t a, al a, 7 in 0 - , p u m u r_.. ❑ 11— U, C tl If in m at -- in N ._ u l �r 6, c. -v C� - c I n U> -- U.1 T no T N -.- n 1 a• ro n- —,-I lL 11 m a m I, In at [ - L 3 n, In - N U n, in m -- L E. - t I' -- Y ❑ 7 N of. It _- m n U 1 '- Y N m n 0) N U I - N C N m I- m ❑ .- L m L m c 7 i to u L Q, T1 if on N m CO C L C > 7 N ry: C m ❑ 7 L E N L 7 a ❑ Ul - c N on J > -0 m a N u - - n't ? c c r c_ R' m m - E fi- In m - C U CC m an C C c m 0- I,1 m - m U 111 m 7 ❑ m N u E+ ] - +, ❑ 7 7 c m r-, Y c E q; z to u 0 1L v z a In 19 (L _t p m Z w z 0' pp m 1a K o U It t8 EL r Q :N m u n rL rp a Q m u a rl m T on or, ❑ ,iI rn m m m In m m '.1 In IP to In �y l(•+ In t. a, If) C , E n_ N m no v C ❑ i, - Q U T - n! rn n, C N -- IV c ro c al on > N m " - w .. P. - U -V CL of, T ,n r C off to I ro T- N It 7 C L al U N c t_ ❑.m >.-- ro E U- X C a to In J N ❑ at z- S: ILU J'70i Z: O u m L m m p ro - U ❑ y W C Y Y lI i 7 - 7 m ❑ Q T !-, U 01 M z <[ al UN in Q c J n 7 T ❑ ❑ Q J +' -❑ L Y u n a c 7 an to W c - <[ E L Al at m 1 I- T Y U U N N O 1 - 7 m- m 0] It uW-,03 J O N m W i Ju - . v Ij.l '-S O 3 E -'I a n; a, m ro m m to on m m m ai 14 m r1 m n, m m m rr, m n, n, m m — - n In - , it) ,n,n,nu)Inlnln In if) L. a, a N - L m c E - C 7 +, a) U N N u _❑ N- N m 3 no N -❑ m P L L L Y L .N ro a] x n, C L 'u u (To -- 3 a .. I, no a, „ ,n C C .- y q. T ❑ C n: n, N 11 N m m Al L u In m -3 ❑ m. L N -- - 7 m C 0)-C U tll F.: t,n I1- I- C) O >" •-, ?- Cn' m +, Y ] to ro N m Y= It,2 m 7 N - ro E N - ❑ -- In N m 3 U_ m S m ❑ - Y❑ x 4 J 11 C E ❑ In N L m _ ❑ an 7 _u f- N ). d 1- L L L - Y 10 ❑ E 3 N N u > N if -- L U R -❑ -u i- T •-, 7 N rn ro 7 N C c E. L m - in •- u-71 In m E N N N C c J 7 -7 N N 7 N- E(L ❑ 17 .-- N r -- L 7 a -- u T m m m 7 7 0 0❑ It N Y m ._ L I- a 1-- m- m N (P -- T r N ♦, E E In m❑ C +; E In 7 C N a. to 7 7❑ U -- -- N N > u ❑ r - 7 - - + ❑ -C L > ❑ - U "I) t C of t. L +te n a (1. N- t!O1.1 Iz zd- ❑.2' I-x ,-I U,_) 131,7 '7 _1Z27d ❑. CY killX 0 r. r47 t� P N 9 4# J-1ll /P flo Tf 1 111 Il r 0 G