Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout239C PALM DESERT HOTEL VENTUREr 17 0 o v 1 044 .. 1' 1 1-1 n ! 1 n 1-] - fl Fr 1 l SUILOINS A W89T ■LOVATION ' - r ............. I{4{�•;,;{II r � _ ....... .... ___ �1p- �' _u [it' �i LJ i SUILOINS A WEST COUNTYANO ELEVATION �.re.ww -:L.A o......,�.,...o..... ..... 1 O S E P H M. P I S C I O T TyA"••• A L.A ItC H I T E C T •'• n Oi:' III Lj _-_--- .---- MUILO/NM ■ EAST ELEVATION ' ■UILOINM E MOUTH ELEVATION t n M _—__----- -. MUILGINYM,-- WESTELEVATION - '-�- =--`--- ++••••+-•+-+• IOSEVM M. PISC IOTTA A I A AItCNITECi USe4J9 Qd i r BUILMINO III WEST COURTYARD ELEVATION Zn [NMI EUILCINO ■ NORTN ELEVATION ■UILOINO ■ MAST COURTYARD ELEVATION OWNIG KI�.w. � YwVwtYN �- =•_a= •�wi: iuiwi1 uuiw.ww • I O S E P M M. P I S C 1 0 T T A�• A I A A ItC H I T E C T 9l'�9I Q(J .. Vacation Inn HOTEL - PALM DESERT January 8,86 Dear Mr. Smith: This letter is to inform you we understand your concern regarding the posibility of a building or structure of some sort being erected on the west side of the Vacation Inn that could block the sign we wish to install on the west wall of our property. - We appreciate your concern, and here by state we would not con- sider your Dept. or the art planning commission in anyway re- sponsible or negilent if this should happen. We do have a public easement road between the adjoining property & the Vacation Inn. Thank -You. Marilyn Molde DIRECTOR OF HOTELS t/c 74-715 HIGHWAY 111 • PALM DESERT, CA. 92261 • (619) 340.4441 • TOLL FREE IN CA 1400.231-8675 M16h10f-4 RcOF T,5,1�� u'e-IAI.IFoF NIA TILE" 1rhPANA #1 mo MIhh10N f?,5D r-LdhHED. j a*PD TRI M 90LI&H -'?AWN II OLIMFie- hTAI►`I Ir NF-k e A1Zr- r:uLL Of 5)DY hr�.IN r xTER.IOR h1-Ljcco Mot�loL,l'f6 I.tX•40q rKOVINWjAL._ -4,W1,11NUM hUDIN61 WINDOW WINDOW MA6TEF DARK OPcN2E AN001Z WY-20LIlaH'(' IRoN �NGE� AND HANDR�I Ls. �xPOhEt7 ME�I"<*L flz�2� Pal I�+r # Ilvl P�UFzT nK,�s.r►�E.. i\ Ht �. _....�.. IHr 1' 3j PROJECT TITLE PLANNING ARCNITCCTORR I THE VACATION INN HOTEL JOSEPH M. PISCIOTTA A I A A R C H I T EXTERIOR COLOR BOARD i410 PAtll R1VO turn let IAN 011166 CAII101NIA 91116 fill. sccocatrr (pier ie print) nc:;inq ::caress 5J ..: y :Taxer I CanTrac.or C RUY OF pQUL� DESERT 43 27Z fPTkka-y peP [L.2rz, GuWln (C®d®P C�a S22do Ficenz a©.� SIGN PROGRV�A%1 f FCAI oaVdrraa Gn 3d 237"dC= a pd�Mrtadeug �d�ddd can a :GN REOUcar ( Desc:ibe type and purpose of the sign(s)). o- �::MATc'7' VALUE OF SIGN (37 * 9�Fd� rn' IGN LOCATION (Street address, wits no., building/project name, or location In relation to streets). SSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONING r etepnone Zlp-Cane celeonone •coerTy Owner Authorization: The undersigned states that they are the owners) of the properry described herein and heraoy give authorization tc The riling of this application. Signature Data mdlord of Building The undersigned starts that they are the landlord of the building far which the sign &I is for, and hereby give authai izaiion and approval for the filing of this application. If some as coove, sign in bath places. Signature Date raement aosolving ine CITY Or PALM DESERT of all lic011ltles relative to any dead restriatlons. I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions h May be appllcaale to the property described herein. Signature Oats Signature OR STAFF USE ONLY) STAFF REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACCEPTED BY: CASE HOO Data v IQYrQnjLm /♦TS-M.92 REFERENCE CASE NO. 60 ��-.� t�,� GAT '• � I� A°L- i t�S �� � ict�l br �,��GA.Ti vt�t Sint �i 14-�, Tt7LI Ij Pik f ti I.-� G4�TI t� SIB 1IC- L r�-� To LCfl �. '/kPLr T Lot: L��A PLt�NTiNC� QT � z 1 6r-A�T COE ti! -rrt- PFi:l C c i-z- T 44T rr )5 Com-- out; �3• Goiti�PLG-'t"'8 1„0,1.5DSc�t,� PL4fJT11�� qJ �'�s I S(p� o� A OZAa (ur 61- . `. GonnPt T� � LII�D Cc�V �LA�7TJr\fG la�Clf�p Strom. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 January 17, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS)• PALM DESERT HOTEL VENTURE, 591 Carmen de la Reina, Suite 1001, San Diego, CA 92108. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT• Reconsideration of requested wall sign facing west. LOCATION: South side of Highway III east of Deep Canyon. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved this case with conditions. Date of Action: January 14, 1986 Vote: Carried 4-0-1 (Chairman Gregory abstaining) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) ------------------------------------- STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. f MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 1986 LOCATION: South side Palm Desert Drive (Highway 111) approximately 210 feet east of Panorama Drive. ZONE: C-1 S.P. Approval is subject to the conditions in the staff report and the following. 1. That the screening of the roof mounted equipment be studied to insure that it is not visible from the street or from the second story offices. III. CASES: A. Final Drawings: 1. CASE NO: 234 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PALM DESERT HOTEL VENTURE, 591 Carmen de la Reina, Suite 1001, San Diego, CA 92108. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Reconsideration of requested wall sign facing west. LOCATION: South side of Highway )II east of Deep Canyon. ZONE• PC (4) S.P. Mr. Smith explained that at study session commission had concerns with two signs being located so close together. He noted that the sign was permitted by code and could be approved if the commission concluded that it would not be facing private property. Commissioner Drury indicated that if a condition stating that the sign would be removed, if requested by the restaurant owner, were applied she might be willing to approve the sign. Mr. Smith thought that they should ask for a letter of authorization from the restaurant owner before the sign is approved rather than having it be removed later. Commissioner Martin thought that the sign should be designed for the area where it is to be placed and also that it was too close in proximity to the monument sign. 3 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 1986 Mr. John Hamilton, applicant, suggested that the monument sign be relocated to an area where it would not conflict with the location of the wall sign. Moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve the wall mounted sign as submitted subject to the monument sign being relocated approximately 200 feet from the existing location. Carried 4-0-1 (Chairman Gregory abstaining) 2. CASE NO: 1064 SA (Amendment) APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): WHOLESALE FURNITURE DIST., 44-850 San Pablo, Palm Desert, CA 92260; GOLDEN STATE SIGN SYSTEMS, III B. Montalvo Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of business identifi- cation sign. LOCATION: Northwest corner San Pablo and Alessandro. ZONE: C-1 Mr. Smith indicated that the commission had been assured that the previously approved sign for this building was the only new sign that wou l d be placed on this building and that a sign program was not needed. Mr. John Ohea, sign contractor, explained that the occupant of the building had leased an additional suite on Alessandro after the approval of the first sign. He stated that the requested sign could be the same colors as the existing sign and that it would be a hand painted wood sign. Mr. Frank Goodman, property owner, confirmed that the occupant did lease an additional suite on Alessandro. Commissioner Cook questioned the amount of signage they were allowed. Mr. Smith stated that they were allowed 30 square feet on Alessandro and they were only requesting 20 square feet. Commissioner Martin questioned the location of the sign to the parapet. Mr. Ohea explained that the parapet was 30" and that the top of the sign would be even with the top of the parapet. 4 AGENDA ITEM NO. III -A -I DATE: January 14, 1986 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 234 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PALM DESERT HOTEL VENTURE, 591 Carmen de la Reina, Suite 1001, San Diego, CA 92108. MATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Reconsideration of requested wall sign facing west. LOCATION: South side Highway III east of Deep Canyon. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. DISCUSSION: December 10, 1985 commission reviewed the sign as proposed by the applicant. The plan indicated the sign would face west. At the meeting staff indicated that notwithstanding the plan the sign would face north and the applicant's representative did not challenge this statement. Following the meeting this error came to light. The problem involves the sign ordinance and its requirements that all signs, with certain exceptions, must face a street or parking lot. Section 25.68.450 prohibits signs facing on private property and states "signs must be placed on the side of the property facing on public or private right-of-way". Attached is a site plan of Vacation Inn which indicates that neither a driveway or parking lot is adjacent to the proposed location of the sign although both are possible when the restaurant is developed. The restaurant site is a separately owned parcel of land and therefore techni- cally speaking the sign would be facing private property. Commission could choose to consider the whole site as one development and therefore possibly approve the sign by making the finding that it does not face onto private property. One last point should be noted, an eight foot high freestanding sign exists in front of the building, almost in line with this proposed wail sign. CONCLUSION• Staff was of the opinion on December 10, 1985 that the requested west facing sign did not comply with code and that is why it was assumed that the sign was intended to face north. It is still felt that the proposed sign does not comply with the intent of the ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: That the requested west facing wall mounted sign not be approved because it is expressly prohibited by code. /dlg N1r1Y,•. N�Y S�'�' •"b l' I P �a `+�a.CG !C9 �.'�niaT L�r• �JI - •y \ ` � «. i`' y�R.�,� 1- — � /j . t .. . Y •� _.. ,�, T tom- Y' f, , y«. i * \ I I LT rip- R :.S .• eau •= '. .. _.�.+ ...s... i �rr..,.�-"- �n m� .tee ^.-.'--+ I _SUMMARY ...9!^a...... •aa --_.. _ .,owP - - I .P 1 T ■ P l A IN ani• r^•Li ♦�u,�i � WAY .' NN w •uew,e. euu r..r..�, o s y„+.• erne 7 x _�.�_--_.-�...u.. .�.., .....�.c ,^u.u..• �. :__ '' ^�Y: rW , V.O. r,aY YY. MOr•\ JOSEVH M. ii5C10TuTrA A I A ARCHITECT I�aP,Y V _. vye •. 1 WUILUING A NORTH ELEVATION' ' GNMIIG .ULG • , NlmMm ..... ......... ••••,1�0 5 E PH M. P 1 5 C 1 0 T T A..... A I A A It CHI IT E C T,1'• P,G.`.i��I �a I \, BUILDING A EAST ELEVATION . . . ...... .... ... . ....... ..... . .... .. . . ....... F�7rPellr-rl, I . ............ ........ .......... .... BUIL.93INGI..A._ MAST COURTYARD ELEVATION t 71 rT BUILDING A BOUTH ELEVATION LEVATIONS ... .......... T"" JOSEPH M. PISCIOTTA A I A A R C H I T C T ism v ........ .... ........ noun ..... 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 239 C Amendment APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201, for Vaction inn. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT• Approval of wall mounted business identifi- cation sign for hotel. LOCATION: South side of Highway ill east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved this case by minute motion. Date of Action: December 10, 1985 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION TUESDAY - DECEMBER 10, 1985 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE 4 M h h 1 h#♦ y# Y#.#♦ s y i y i i i t i## y• i i f Y iY ♦# ff Y k. I. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 pm after a one hour study session. Commission Members Current Meeting Year to Date(9/10/85) Present Absent Present Absent Ron Gregory, Chairman X 6 1 Al Cook X 5 2 Rick Holden X 6 1 Bernie Leung X 5 2 Charlie Martin X 5 2 Staff Present: Steve Smith Stan Sawa Phil Drell Donna Gomez It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Leung to approve the minutes of November 26, 1985 as written. II. Moved by Commissioner Leung, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve the following cases by minute nation. Carried 4-0 (Chairman Gregory abstained from Case No. 253 C) 1. CASE NO: 239 C Amendment APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201, for Vacation Inn. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of wall mounted business identification sign for hotel. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111 east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. 2. CASE NO: 1030 SA Amendment APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201. for Continental Inn. AGENDA ITEM NO. II► -A-I DATE: December 10, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 239 C Amendment APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201, for Vacation Inn. MATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of wall mounted business identification sign for hotel. LOCATION: South side of Highway III east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. DISCUSSION: Commission will recall that it approved a freestanding sign for the hotel on October 22, 1985. The present request is to install a wall mounted sign. It is intended that the sign will be on two lines. In addition, the size may not exceed a height of 20 feet above grade. The proposed sign is to be mounted on a raceway and have internal neon tubing and plex face. Color is not noted. The sign area of 86 square feet although quite large does comply with the code limits. The plan calls for three feet high letters on the top row although the letters scale to 24 inches. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the lack of details staff can not recommend approval, although if the applicant can provide the necessary information at the meeting, staff would have no objection to commission granting approval. o:ff IBZI ,�, =®=�rD-a 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-061.1 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201, for Vacation Inn. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of freestanding sign for hotel. LOCATION: South side Highway 11.1 east of Shadow Hills Road. _ ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by 'staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission approved this case. Date of Action: October 22, 1985 Vote: Carried 5-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 22, 1985 Mr. Holden indicated that along with approval of permanent and temporary banks he would like conceptual approval of a sign. He noted that the location of the sign was to be above the height limit that code permits and that it would have to be approved by planning commission. The proposed sign was to be solid metal, baked -on car enamel being back -lit and the preferred color being fleetwood v green. Mr. Sawa asked the commission if it would be in favor of amending the code pertaining to height limits for signs. Commission was in favor of amending code for sign height limits. Commissioner Martin questioned the need for the temporary bank when final approval of the permanent bank has already been received. Mr. Holden explained that approval from Caltrans was needed prior to construction of the permanent building. Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook to grant final and preliminary approval on temporary building, final approval on permanent building and conceptual approval of sign program. Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Holden abstaining). IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS: 1. CONTINENTAL AND VACATION INN'S Mr. Smith explained that city council had concurred that each hotel should be allowed 35 square feet in sign area. Chairman Gregory stated that he had concerns with the colors of Continental Inn and with the slump stone on the base of the signs. Commissioner Cook questioned how the signs relate to the buildings. The applicant indicated that the stucco on the base of the sign would match the stucco on the buildings. Mr. Smith noted that the location of the Vacation Inn sign was fine but there is concern with the location of the Continental Inn sign. He also noted that the future restaurant will not be allowed a freestanding sign. z MINUTES .-'ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OCTOBER 22, 1985 -- Commission felt that the Continental Inn sign would be a traffic : hazard in -its current position. It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve Vacation Inn sign as submitted. Carried 5-0 It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve the Continental Inn sign with the following condition. 1. That the sign location be submitted to staff for approval pertaining to the safety of the sign. Carried 5-0 2. AGRICULTURAL COMMISSION LETTER Chairman Gregory indicated that he had received a letter from the agricultural commission stating that all landscape plans must be approved by them. The commission thought that this was an impracticable requirement and as such they did not wish to formally respond to the letter. 3. HIROKO'S AWNING - Case No. 213 C Amendment #1 Portals submitted a blue and pink 6 foot dome front awning. Commissioner Cook questioned if the awning would oxidize. Mr. Beatty indicated that it would a little. Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve the awning as submitted. Carried 5-0 4. REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTALS Mr. Mark Beatty, Portals, questioned the requirements for submitting awnings for review. He felt -that he has worked hard to meet the city standards and that other applicants for awnings have received approval with inadequate information. 10 C 077 OF FAL K DD ES _ --7 FORN He. 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Psum ClawaP$, C.2"gym APFUCATOCH F-CRE : d3pertsu ct ce maumd= nM3c t,1d zwy! . a �d�cnandan�l cidndad��n a Palm Desert Hotel Venture Applicant (pwase print) .��r��,4�-� de 3� R---- c,.; .., trim (6191 J99-6222 MoDtnq tars" fielepnons San Diego, Ca. 92108 pry star• ZIP -Goat REQUEST: (Desc, a specIftc nature of approval requested 1. Monument sign approval PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 110 room VACATION INN HOTEL LOCATED AT 74715 Hwy 111 Palm Desert, Ca. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 20217 EXISTING ZONING PC (4) Praoerty C .nor lurnonza*ion The undersigned star" that mey am the owner (s) of the prover7y d"ertb" herein and hereby give author- isatlon his the YiGna at this aaaimrlan. ramem aasam"'i ma ury or r lmfyeserr ar all ua0ames relative to any dead restrictions. 1 DO 8Y MY SIGNATURE ON THIS A EEMENT, Absolve Me C:ty at Paim Desert of all Flo Oliltles regarding any dead rasmCons 17 , filar day 00 Q==04 to me proasrrf descn read herstph. Applicnt s Signature (FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Ettnronmenrol Status C Ministerial Act E.A. No. ❑ Categorical Ezemohon ❑ Nagarive DaCarvlon ❑ Other A=Mfed by, C(n1SLS moo Reference Cass No. 91S-11 ' Oars Date :W. i G:5:azr off 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 1030 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201 for Continental Inn. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of freestanding sign for hotel. LOCATION: South side Highway 111 east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued this case. Date of Action: September 10, 1985 Vote: Carried 3-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the -attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 1985 I. That staff review the roof mounted equipment at the time of inspection to determine if additional screening is necessary. 2. CASE NO: 1030 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of freestanding sign for hotel. (Continental Inn) LOCATION: South side Highway III east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Mr. Smith indicated that the proposed sign is not permitted by code and informed the applicant that city council must determine if the freestanding sign is to be permitted. Commission agreed that the marquee should be deleted and that it would not like to see a lolli-pop type of sign. Commission thought that the sign should be scaled down and that there should be an attempt by Continental Inn and Vacation Inn to work together in making the two signs compatible. Moved by Commissioner Leung, seconded by Commissioner Holden to continue this case. Carried 3-0 3. CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): VACATION INN NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Sign plan approval for hotel. LOCATION: South side Highway 111, east of Shadow Hills Road. Mr. Smith indicated that the proposed sign is not permitted by code and informed the applicant that city council must determine if the freestanding sign is to be permitted. Commission noted that they would not like to see a lolli-pop type of sign. Commission thought that the sign should be scaled down and that there should be an attempt by Continental Inn and Vacation Inn to work together in making the two signs compatible. 4 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM CITY OF PALM DESERT Honorable Mayor and City Council Department of Community Development/Planning Signage for Vacation Inn and Continental Inn October 10, 1985 September 10, 1985 the architectural commission reviewed the sign program requests from Vacation Inn and Continental Inn. In each case a freestanding monument sign was requested. Staff advised architectural review commission that the signs as proposed do not comply with code provisions relating to signs. Commission, at the suggestion of staff, continued the cases to allow council to review the matter to determine if there is any option open other than out -right denial of the freestanding monument signs. SIGN REGULATIONS: Municipal code Title 25. Chapter 68 regulates signs in the city. Sections 310 and 390 (copies attached) specifically address themselves to freestanding signs. Section 310 specifically limits itself to the general commercial zone (le: Cl). Under very limited circumstances lie: when the building or complex location or configuration or topographical variation or other similar circum- stance Preclude the effective use of a s i an on the building) a freestanding sign may be permitted. Section 390 permits freestanding signs in addition to wall signs in district shopoina centers, regional shopping centers and industrial parks (PC-2, PC-3 and SI zones). The size of these freestanding signs is limited to 10 square feet per acre in the center to a maximum of 100 square feet. In addition and most importantly a minimum of 3-1/2 acre size limit is imposed. As can be discerned the PC (4) zone which permits hotels and which is the zoning of the subject property is not specifically addressed. The Embassy Suites Hotel (formerly Granada Royale) sign was processed under section 390. It's 9.2 acre site was therefore entitled to up to 92 square feet. .The sign, as approved was 80 square feet. It is staff's position that it is appropriate to use section 390 for the PC (4) zone because the zone has a minimum 4 acre property size limit. The Intent being that a property in the zone will be developed In a unified fashion and the property or center can then be identified by a freestanding sign. In the case when an individual business occupies a PC (4) property then that' business would .be eligible for Its own freestanding sign. In this instance to the whole 6 acre property (2 hotels and a restaurant) could be Identified with a freestanding sign and each individual business have its own wall mounted identification. If It is the desire of council each business in the PC (4) zone could be entitled to its own freestanding slan. If this option is selected then an appropriate code amendment along with noticed public hearings would need to be Processed through the planning commission and ultimately through the city council. In discussions with the city attorney's office it was felt that if the city wanted these hotels to have individual freestanding signs then a variance pursuant to the minimum acreage requirements of section 68.390 could be Processed and the necessary findinas probably could be made. CONCLUSION: A. If it is the wish of the city that these hotels not have individual freestanding monument signs then no action is necessary and code as interpretted by staff will stand on it's own. B. If it is the wish of the city that these hotels be entitled to individual freestanding monument signs then the applicants could be directed to Process a variance to the provision of code section 68.390 which requires a minimum 3-1/2 acre site to be eligible for the sign. C. if it is the wish of the city that the code be amended to permit these hotels to have individual freestanding monument signs along with others who might fall into this situation then staff should be directed to process an appropriate amendment to the sign ordinance. 25.68.310--25.68.335 25.68.310 Freestanding signs. A. A building or com- mercial complex within the general commercial zone with in- dividual street frontage shall be allowed one double faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage tenant identification when the building or comnlexlocation or configuration or topographical variation or other similar circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the building but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and location of either the design review board, planniac commission or city council. B. The scuare footage of one face of a double faced Sign shall be counted; however, the square_ fcotace of such sign face shall in no case exceed one-ha'_f the total allowable sicnace of the front of the buildi therefrom. ng and shall be subtracted C. The area of such signs shall not exceed fifty square feet per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet. D. All detached signs shall be placed within a per- manently landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and be architecturally compatible with the building or complex; and. not encroach in the public riaht-of-way. E. Any freestanding sign confor:sing to the recuirements of Section 25.68.310 as in effect on September 23, i981, shall be considered exempted from these provisions until such time as the owner changes his sign copy. (Ord. 272 (part), 1981: Ord. 129 54(part), 1977; Ord. 98 51(part), 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-12.03(B)). 25.68.320 Second -story businesses. Businesses main- tained exclusively on the second floor of a two-story build- ing may be allowed up to fifty percent of the sign area authorized for businesses conducted in single -story buildings by the design review board process. (Ord. 129 54(part), 1977: Ord. 98 51(part), 1975: Exhibit A 523.38-12.04). 25.68.330 Sign for pedestrian traffic. Where the prin- cipal sign for a business is 71 located so that it cannot be seen by pedestrian traffic, an identification sign, in addition to that otherwise allowed in this chanter, shall be permitted. Such a sign shall be no larger than three square feet (three feet on each side) and it shall be designed and located so as to not distract from the appearance of the building or violate the intent of this chapter. (Ord. 129 54(part), 1977: Ord. 98 51(part), 1975: Exhibit A 525.38- 12.05) 25.68.335 Directional signs for court and or plaza businesses.. Wher'e'commercial buildings or comnlexes are designed to contain tenant spaces oriented to an interior courtyard or plaza and where the principal business iden- tification sign is located on that courtyard or plaza front- age, the commercial building or complex may be permitted . 424 (Palm Desert 7/82) 25.68.390--25.68.395 ( currentlybei ng offered. *Any special conditions recuired for sale at such lowest price shall also be indicated. (Ord. 129 54(part), 1977: Ord. 98 51(part), 1975: Exhibit A . 525.38-12.11). L 68. centers and industrial Darks. g, yIn aoW_pnal snoraina- sicn area allowed for individual businesses1Oshonptng cen ters and industrial parks in excess of three and onehalf acres of land shall be allowed one identification sign on each right-of-way. Such signs shall not extend beyond the Property line or into the right-of-way and shall be used solely to identify the shopping centarea, or businesses and/shopping or activities conducted er, t_.e reiz Rol to such signs, the allowable siative e gn area ten square feet hsign acre. a shall be based on teed one hundred square feet, shall Thave axhese lms mhtshall not ex - twelve feet, and shall not be erected ihei Proper approval. as provided in this chapter. B. Further, where the unique design of the center allows for adequate integration of.a larger sign, the per- mitted pedestrian traffic signs as allowed in Section 25.68- .330 may be increased to a maximum of six scuare feet per side. (Ord. 272 (part), 1981: Ord. 129 54(part), 1977: Ord. 98 51(part), 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-12.12). 25.68.395 Buildin or building complex identification signs in the a__,----Cnmme �, -:____ w cne wall sign�.' a "u zlcn area allowed for individual businesses, general commercial district buildings or building complexes which are designed to contain four or more distinct tenant spaces, may be allowed one identification sign on each richt- of-way, or public access thoroughfare. such signs shall rot extend beyond the property line or into the right-of-way or thoroughfare, and shall be used solely to identify the build- ina or building complex. Relative to such signs, the maximum allowable sign area shall be based on the following: sign areaUp to fifty feet of frontage, three square feet of B• Over fifty feet of frontage, up to seventy-five feet, five square feet of sign area; C. Over seventy-five feet, ten square feet of feet of frontage, up to one hundred sign area; D. Over one hundred feet of frontage, maximum size of fifteen square feet. Buildings with frontage .of one hundred..feet.... or more shall ---- -be permitted a free standing sign, height not to exceed eight feet. (Ord. 272 (part), 1981: Ord. 22 52, 1980). 426-1 (Palm Desert 7/82) AGENDA ITEM NO: III-A-6 DATE: February 14, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL CASE NO: 911 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GRANADA ROYALE HOMETEL, 74-700 Highway 111, Palm Desert, California, 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of a free-standing monument sign. LOCATION: 74-200 Highway 111. ZONE: PC (4), S.P. BACKGROUND: The applicant wishes to install a free-standing monument sign to be located 7S4 feet north of the front property line west of the entrance to the hometel. The proposed monument and sign is to be 12 feet high and 18 feet in width. The sign itself sits atop the 6 foot 8 inch monument and has dimensions of 5 feet in height and 16 feet in width for an area of 80 square feet. The base of the sign is to be sheet metal covered with texturized paint to match the building (ivory). The sign itself is to have an ivory background with green and rust letters. The cabinet will be dark bronze. In the PC zone, monument sign size is limited by the acreage of the site. This site is some 9.2 acres which would entitle a 92 square foot sign. The sign as proposed conforms to size and height limits of the code. RECOMMENDATION: That the proposed monument sign for Granada Royale Hometel, Case 911 SA, be approved. 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): VACATION INN, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT• Sign plan approval for hotel. LOCATION: South side Highway III, east of Shadow Hills Road. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission continued this case. Date of Action: September 10, 1985 Vote: Carried 3-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 1985 1. That staff review the roof mounted equipment at the time of inspection to determine if additional screening is necessary. 2. CASE NO: 1030 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY, 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of freestanding sign for hotel. (Continental Inn) LOCATION: South side Highway Ill east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Mr. Smith indicated that the proposed sign is not permitted by code and informed the applicant that, city council must determine if the freestanding sign is to be permitted. Commission agreed that the marquee should be deleted and that it would not like to see a lolli-pop type of sign. Commission thought that the sign should be scaled down and that there should be an attempt by Continental Inn and Vacation Inn to work together in making the two signs compatible. Moved by Commissioner Leung, seconded by Commissioner Holden to continue this case. Carried 3-0 3. CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): VACATION INN NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Sign plan approval for hotel. LOCATION: South side Highway Ill, east of Shadow Hills Road. Mr. Smith indicated that the proposed sign is not permitted by code and informed the applicant that city council must determine if the freestanding sign is to be permitted. Commission noted that they would not like to see a lolli-pop type of sign. Commission thought that the sign should be scaled down and that there should be an attempt by Continental Inn and Vacation Inn to work together in making the two signs compatible. 4 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 1985 Moved by Commissioner Leung, seconded by Commissioner Holden to continue this case. Carried 3-0 4. CASE NO: 62 C amendment APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PALMS TO PINES, Draperies 8 Canvas for Michael's Restaurant, 73-111 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of a freestanding awning with signage. LOCATION: South side El Paseo east of Ocotillo. ZONE: C-1 S.P. Commissioner Leung indicated that he had no objection to the architecture of the awning. Commissioner Holden stated that the freestanding awning was not connected in any way nor did if relate to the building(s) in any way. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Chairman Gregory to deny this request. Carried 2-1 (Commissioner Leung opposed) 5. CASE NO: 1038 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): THOMAS NOWLAN, 68-780 Olancha #A, Cathedral City, CA 92234. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of business identification signs. (Domino's Pizza) LOCATION: 73-711 Highway Ill - south side Hwy 11 east of Larkspur. ZONE: C-1 S.P. Moved by Commissioner Leung, seconded by Commissioner Holden to approve this case as submitted. Carried 3-0 6. CASE NO: 289 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROYCE CONNOR, 74-935 Highway Ill, Indian Wells, CA 92210; C.W. MAXWELL, 1109 Mesquite Avenue, Palm Springs, CA 92264. 5 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 April 18, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108; OSEPH M. PISCOTTA, 4470 Park Blvd #103, San Diego, CA 92116. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a 131 room hotel. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission minute motioned this case. Date of Action: April 9, 1985 Vote: Carried 3-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY - APRIL 9, 1985 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE * ■ * x � * � * * a * * * �r * * x r * �r � * x � * + �t * a it * * r � r x + � x � r + x � I. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. after a one hour study session. Members Present: Ron Gregory Bernie Leung Rick Holden Members Absent: Al Cook Charlie Martin Staff Present: Ray Diaz Steve Smith Stan Sawa Donna Gomez Moved by Commissioner Gregory, seconded by Commissioner Leung to approve the minutes of the March 26, 1985 meeting as amended. Carried 2-0-1 (Commissioner Holden abstained). II. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Leung to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 3-0 1. CASE NO: 161 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): FOUNDATION FOR THE RETARDED OF THE DESERT, 73-255 Country Club Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260; WENDELL VEITH, 45-275 Prickly Pear Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval of plans for addition to facility. LOCATION: 73-255 Country Club Drive ZONE: Public Use 2. CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina T11001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH M. PISCOTTA, 4470 Park Blvd. i1103, San Diego, CA 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a 131 room hotel. LOCATION: South side of Highway III, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Subject to the following conditions: 1. That landscaping on south property line be changed from eight 15 gallon trees to sixteen 24" box trees. 2. That tennis court fence be lowered to 12 feet on the ends and 10 feet on the sides. 3. The commission strongly suggested that the applicant substitute the concrete tile with clay tile. AGENDA ITEM NO: III-A-2 DATE: April 9, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH M. PISCOTTA, AIA, 4470 Park Blvd. #103, San Diego, CA 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a 131 room hotel. LOCATION: South side of Highway III, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. DISCUSSION: This case was granted preliminary approval of architectural plans on December 11, 1984, and landscaping plans on January 8, 1985 subject to some conditions (see attached). The conditions are generally acceptable, but there is some need for clarification and minor modification. The precise plan required the existing wall along the south property line to be raised to seven feet in height. While the plans note this, they do not note the time of providing it. Since it is required to minimize impact, it should be provided before any work commences. The exterior lighting plan and information has been submitted and will need to be approved by staff separately from the architectural commission approval. The plans indicate that they are three parking spaces short. These will need to be provided. They can be provided in the small putting green area north of the connecting aisle with the Continental Inn. This would be acceptable to staff. The plans indicate a fourteen foot high fence around the tennis courts. To minimize the impact, staff recommends that the fencing be reduced by two feet in height. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the final drawings be approved subject to the following conditons: 1. Raising of wall height along south property line shall be done prior to any other work being done. 2. Three additional parking spaces shall be provided. 3. Tennis court fencing to be reduced two feet in height. w ¢I �_W 3ktt�j 0 5 DOv 13,0 P.R.-5 ,N w S.P. R•3 M P.C.(4), F.C.(4),N c•i, s.P. S.P. S.P. 5TATE 11/GNW4K C—iIS. P. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PP 84-39 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits (Case No. PP 84-39) on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all municipal code requirements to the degree that the city could consider each phase as a single project. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within twelve months from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted by the planning commission; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations in addition ) ordinances and state federal statutes tes in force, orwh which hereaftermay lbepin force. mit for truction of use 5. this approval rior to issuance applicant a nshallr first obta ns permits and/or clearance contemplated approval, following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission Riverside County Department of Health City Fire Marshal Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground, if practicable, as a part of the development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 7. Adjacent to south property line, a ten foot wide heavily landscaped planter shall be provided; planting to include vertical trees for screening. 8. Existing wall along south property line shall be raised to seven feet provided property owner of wall agrees; wall extension to match existing wall. 9. Parking lot lighting system shall be designed to comply with municipal code requirements with light standards to be maximum 20 feet high. Lights to be down - shining box type light and provided with the shields facing residential properties. Plans, specifications, computer lighting print-out to be approved by city during architectural review process. lding 10. Reciprocal subject property and parcels to westc contained in Parcel Map1permits 202117P between 11. All glazing in that part of building 'A' facing Highway III to be double paned to mitigate noise. 12. Landscaping area between Highway 111 and first buildings to be bermed three to four feet in height. 13. Tennis courts to be sunk four feet below grade to the satisfaction of the city. -2- _......_..G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14. Minimum 20 foot paved drive to frontage road shall be provided on proposed restaurant site to west to satisfaction of the city. 15. Marked separate pedestrian walkway shall be provided between handicap stalls next to building 113' across to putting green area. Department of Public Works: 16. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 17. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 18. Landscaping maintenance on Frontage Road shall be provided by the owner's association. 19. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 20. Only one driveway approach will be allowed to serve this property. Size and location to public works specifications. 21. A traffic signal at the entrance to Highway 111 shall be installed. Until signal is energized, there shall be no access to Highway I II allowed. City Fire Marshal: 22. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 3 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 23. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 24. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 25. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-39 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 26. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 27. Fire lanes will be required. 28. All turns in parking area to have a 40' radius. 29. Porte Cochere clearance to be 13'6" high for emergency vehicle access. -3- MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JANUARY 8, 1985 10. CASE NO: 246 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MONTEREY PARTNERSHIP, 64 San Sebastian, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270; CHARLES MARTIN, 73-725 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final landscape plan approval. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey and Fred Waring. ZONE: Office Professional 11. CASE NO: 178 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DESERT EVANGILICAL FREE CHURCH, 73-730 Highway III, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised elevations. LOCATION: South side of Hovley Lane between Monterey and Portola. ZONE: PR-5 III. CASES: r7— f-CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina 11001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH PISCOTTA, 4470 Park Blvd. #103 San Diego, CA 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of landscape plans for a 128 room hotel. LOCATION: South side Highway III, approx. 680 feet east of Shadow Hills. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Commission noted that the landscaping plan did not indicate sizes. Commissioner Gregory noted that the minimum size of landscaping should be 15 gallon with the 15 gallon material should not exceed 1/3 of total trees installed. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve Case No. 239 C subject to the following condition: 1. That landscaping should be a minimum of 15 gallon material with the 15 gallon material should not exceed 1/3 of total trees installed. 2. CASE NO: 281 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DESERT SPRINGS TENNIS RESORT INC. CIRCLE Z INC., 73-700 Highway 111 #9, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary architectural approval of plans for a 156 unit condominium project. LOCATION: Northeast corner Cook and Hovely. ZONE: PR-5 S.P. Commission indicated that this project would need additional blow sand protection. Mr. Diaz stated that he is requesting that they receive specific fire marshal approval of the emergency fire access way -at Via Cinta. Commissioner Gregory informed applicant that the erythrina will not grow in this area• He. also, noted that a minimum size of 15 gallon should be used with the total of 15 gallons not to exceed 1/3 of total landscaping. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 1904 1. Landscaping plans to be revised to upsize and upgrade material to be installed. 2. Submit tile roof samples. 6. CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reins p1001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH PISCOTTA, 4470 Park Blvd, #103, San Diego, CA 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 109 room hotel. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval_ to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All con- ditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. All conditions of PP 84-39 shall be met. 4. Prior to approval of.a grading plan, tennis court pad and fencing heights shall be approved by the department of environmental ser- vices. 5. Trash enclosures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the city at the time the architectural commission approves the final. working drawings. 6. Along east property line, near southern property line where no wall exists, applicant shall install block wall to match wall (height h material) along rear property line. 7. Arches in tower must have a depth)of at least one foot. 7. C NO: 245 C APPLICAN ND ADDRESS): GORDON VAN DER BOOM, 83-688 Ave a 45 #B, Indio, CA 9 1; ROBERT RITCHEY, 45-120 San Pablo Ave e, Palm Desert, CA 922'Q. RE OF PROJECT/APP OVAL SOUGHT: a 10,800 square foo industria of plans LOCATION:;28 side of St. ar Place, approximately 145 feet north of rranean. ZONE: S.P. Subject ti ions noted on landscape p ans on file with Department of EnviroServices. 6. CASE NO:MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PAUL M. MADISON, 27217 E. 5th Street, Highland, CA 92366. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 9 unit apartment complex. ZONE: R-2 Gf:(�Pur oO 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 January 11, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH PISCOTTA, 4470 Park Blvd. #103, San Diego, CA 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of landscape plans for a 128 room hotel. LOCATION: South side Highway 111, approx. 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission approved this case. Date of Action: January 8, 1985 Vote: Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Gregory abstaining) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JANUARY 8, 1985 10. CASE NO: 246 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MONTEREY PARTNERSHIP, 64 San Sebastian, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270; CHARLES MARTIN, 73-725 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final landscape plan approval. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey and Fred Waring. ZONE: Office Professional 11. CASE NO: 178 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DESERT EVANGILICAL FREE CHURCH, 73-730 Highway III, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised elevations. LOCATION: South side of Hovley Lane between Monterey and Portola. ZONE: PR-5 III. CASES: 1. CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH PISCOTTA, 4470 Park Blvd. #103 San Diego, CA 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of landscape plans for a 128 room hotel. LOCATION: South side Highway 111, approx. 680 feet east of Shadow Hills. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Commission noted that the landscaping plan did notAndicate sizes. Commissioner Gregory noted that the minimum size of landscaping should be 15 gallon with the 15 gallon material should not exceed 1/3 of total trees installed. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve Case No. 239 C subject to the following condition: 1. That landscaping should be a minimum of 15 gallon material with the 15 gallon material should not exceed 1/3 of total trees installed. 2. CASE NO: 281 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DESERT SPRINGS TENNIS RESORT INC. CIRCLE Z INC., 73-700 Highway 111 ff9, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary architectural approval of plans for a 156 unit condominium project. LOCATION: Northeast corner Cook and Hovely. ZONE: PR-5 S.P. Commission indicated that this project would need additional blow sand protection. Mr. Diaz stated that he is requesting that they receive specific fire marshal approval of the emergency fire access way at Via Cinta. Commissioner Gregory informed applicant that the erythrina will not grow in this area• He. also, noted that a minimum size of 15 gallon should be used with the total of 15 gallons not to exceed 1/3 of total landscaping. -4- AGENDA ITEM -NO. III-B1 DATE- January 8, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH PISCOTTA 4470 Park Blvd. fl103, San Diego, 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of landscape plans for a 128 room hotel. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. DISCUSSION: This request was previously given preliminary approval of the architectural plans at the meeting of December 11, 1984. However, the landscaping plans could not be approved at that time due to a lack of a voting quorum. Therefore, the pre- liminary landscaping plan is being resubmitted for review. The landscaping plan shows species and general location. The plan appears to be acceptable provided sizes, which are not indicated are sufficiently large and varied in location. RECOMMENDATION: The plan appears to be acceptable from a technical standpoint. The commission should review the plan to determine acceptability. Stan Sawa, Principal Planner /dig 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 December 18, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH PISCOTTA, 4470 Park Blvd. #103, San Diego, CA 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 109 room hotel. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) SP Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission minute motioned this case. Date of Action: December 11, 1984 Vote: Carried 2-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert wihtin fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 1984 1. Landscaping plans to be revised to upsize and upgrade material to be installed. 2. Submit tile roof samples. 6. CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH PISCOTTA, 4470 Park Blvd, #103, San Diego, CA 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 109 room hotel. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All con- ditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. All conditions of PP 84-39 shall be met. 4. Prior to approval of a grading plan, tennis court pad and fencing heights shall be approved by the department of environmental ser- vices. 5. Trash enclosures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the city at the time the architectural commission approves the final working drawings. 6. Along east property line, near southern property line where no wall exists, applicant shall install block wall to match wall (height & material) along rear property line. 7. Arches in tower must have a depth,of at least one foot. 7. C NO: 245 C APPLICAN ND ADDRESS): GORDON VAN DER BOOM, 83-688 Ave a 45 981 Indio, CA 9 1; R08ERT RITCHEY, 45-120 San Pablo Ave e, Palm Desert, CA 922 NATURE OF PROJECT/AP VAL SOUGHT: Prelimina approval of plans for a 100800 square Poo industrial buil LOCATION: West side of St. ar Place, approximately 145 feet north of Mediterranean. ZONE: S.I. S.P. Subject to condi ons noted on landscape p ns on file with Department of Environmen Services. 8. CASE N0: 280 MF APP ANT (AND ADDRESS): PAUL M. MADISON, 27217 E. 5th Street, H' hland, CA 92366. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 9 unit apartment complex. ZONE: R-2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1005 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 131 ROOM HOTEL ON TEH SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111, APPROXIMATELY 680 FEET EAST OP4HAQOW HILLS ROAD. CASE NO. IWPP 84-39 D WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of October, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued hearings on October 30, and October 16, 1984, to consider the request of GARY LEEDS (Vacation Inn Hotel) for approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of a 113 (revised to 131 rooms) room hotel in PC (4) S.P. zone on 2.27 acres located on the south side of Highway 111, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road, more particularly described as: Portion of Lot 1, Tract 11883 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan 84-39 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. 3. That a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact is hereby approved. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 30th day of October, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: ERWOOD ATTE : t s J, RAMON A. DIAZ, SecretWly u P110RD CRITES, Chairman Am -1- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1005 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PP 84-39 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits (Case No. PP 84-39) on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all municipal code requirements to the degree that the city could consider each phase as a single project. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within twelve months from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted by the planning commission; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission Riverside County Department of Health City Fire Marshal Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground, if practicable, as a part of the development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 7. Adjacent to south property line, a ten foot wide heavily landscaped planter shall be provided; planting to include vertical trees for screening. 8. Existing wall along south property line shall be raised to seven feet provided property owner of wall agrees; wall extension to match existing wall. 9. Parking lot lighting system shall be designed to comply with municipal code requirements with light standards to be maximum 20 feet high. Lights to be down - shining box type light and provided with the shields facing residential properties. Plans, specifications, computer lighting print-out to be approved by city during architectural review process. 10. Reciprocal access agreements to be recorded prior to issuance of building permits between subject property and parcels to west contained in Parcel Map 20217. 11. All glazing in that part of building 'A' facing Highway 111 to be double paned to mitigate noise. 12. Landscaping area between Highway III and first buildings to be bermed three to four feet in height. 13. Tennis courts to be sunk four feet below grade to the satisfaction of the city. -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1005 14. Minimum 20 foot paved drive to frontage road shall be provided on proposed restaurant site to west to satisfaction of the city. 15. Marked separate pedestrian walkway shall be provided between handicap stalls next to building'13' across to putting green area. Department of Public Works: 16. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 17. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 18. Landscaping maintenance on Frontage Road shall be provided by the owner's association. 19. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 20. Only one driveway approach will be allowed to serve this property. Size and location to public works specifications. 21. A traffic signal at the entrance to Highway I I I shall be installed. Until signal is energized, there shall be no access to Highway I I I allowed. City Fire Marshal: 22. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 3 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 23. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 24. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 25. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-39 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 26. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 27. Fire lanes will be required. 28. All turns in parking area to have a 40' radius. 29. Porte Cochere clearance to be 1316" high for emergency vehicle access. -3- a AGENDA ITEM NO. III-B-4 DATE: December 11, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH M. PISCOTTA, AIA, 4470 Park Blvd. #103, San Diego, CA 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 192 room hotel. 1Z LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. DISCUSSION: The site is a 2.97 acre site fronting on Highway Ill at the easterly city boundary. This parcel is part of a larger 7.28 acre site that has been divided into 3 parcels (two for hotels and one for a restaurant). The project is laid out with two similar "U' shaped duildings with parking spread out through the site. ARCHITECTURE: The buildings are three stories in height and spanish in nature. The exterior materials consist of stucco walls, wrought iron railing, dark wood trim and mission tile roofing. Bridging and connected to the front building is a stucco porte cochere with a tile roof. The roof plans indicate there is sufficient solar protection of glass areas. LANDSCAPING: A preliminary landscaping plan has been submitted which indicates species and general locations. The plans appear to be acceptable provided sizes, which are not indicated, are sufficiently large and varied in location. LIGHTING: A tentative site lighting plan has been submitted which appears acceptable. However, a computerized lighting level print out and light fixture brochures will have to be submitted to staff for approval. The lighting levels will need to comply with city requirements. SIGNS: No signage has yet been proposed. This will therefore have to be reviewed by the commission at a later date. PLANNING COMMISSION: The precise plan for this item was approved by the planning commission at the meeting of October 30, 1984. RECOMMENDATION: The plans appear to be generally acceptable to staff from a technical standpoint. "fie commission should review the plans to determine acceptability. Should the commission approve this request, it should be subject to the following conditions: c 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shslal be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. All conditions of PP 84-39 shall be met. 4. Prior to approval of a grading plan, tennis court pad and fencing heights shall be approved by the department of environmental services. 5. Trash enclosures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the city at the time the architectural commission approves the final working drawings. 6. Along east property line, near southern property line where no wall exists, applicant shall install block wall to match wall (height do material) along rear property line. Prepared by: :: 3GIniJ� COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PP 94-39 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits (Case No. PP 84-39) on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all municipal code requirements to the degree that the city could consider each phase as a single project. 3. Construction of a portion of said project shall commence within twelve months from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted by the planning commission; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission Riverside County Department of Health City Fire Marshal Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground, if practicable, as a part of the development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 7. Adjacent to south property line, a ten foot wide heavily landscaped planter shall be provided; planting to include vertical trees for screening. 8. Existing wall along south property line shall be raised to seven feet provided property owner of wall agrees; wall extension to match existing wall. 9. Parking lot lighting system shall be designed to comply with municipal code requirements with light standards to be maximum 20 feet high. Lights to be down - shining box type light and provided with the shields facing residential properties. Plans, specifications, computer lighting print-out to be approved by city during architectural review process. 10. Reciprocal access agreements to be recorded prior to issuance of building permits between subject property and parcels to west contained in Parcel Map 20217. 11. All glazing in that part of building 'A' facing Highway 111 to be double paned to mitigate noise. 12. Landscaping area between Highway III and first buildings to be bermed three to four feet in height. 13. Tennis courts to be sunk four feet below grade to the satisfaction of the city. -2- G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14. Minimum 20 foot paved drive to frontage road shall be provided on proposed restaurant site to west to satisfaction of the city. 15. Marked separate pedestrian walkway shall be provided between handicap stalls next to building'B' across to putting green area. Department of Public Works: 16. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 17. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 18. Landscaping maintenance on Frontage Road shall be provided by the owner's association. 19. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 20. Only one driveway approach will be allowed to serve this property. Size and location to public works specifications. 21. A traffic signal at the entrance to Highway Ill shall be installed. Until signal is energized, there shall be no access to Highway 111 allowed. City Fire Marshal: 22. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 3 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 23. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 24. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 25. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-39 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 26. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 27. Fire lanes will be required. 28. All turns in parking area to have a 40' radius. 29. Porte Cochere clearance to be 13'6" high for emergency vehicle access. -3- ���� ��.. 2 ♦--V11YYL�� l�; iA R' I ` 5Lo0 13,0 PR.-5 ,N z S.P. W W ' R•314) R-3 (4 P.C.(4)1 F.C.(4),N; } S. P. S. P. STATE H/5;HW4V C-I, S.P. C-I, a C-F S. R-3 (4) S P P<< n C. ,•,C P Fiti P ->, Q R-3 R-3 iii R- , ) 33) 4 sw a P.R.-6 - (39 MP 11-77) • -CHATEAU NORTH' u P.R.-4 5CUP-01-74 PD)' 0 I • -,R-P 10,000.• .•. -1 PEPPER TREE- DRIVE PROJECT SITE 2. CASE NO• 239C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY. LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reins #1001, San Diego, CA 92108 and Joseph- M. Piscotta, AIA, 4470 Park Blvd. #103, San Diego, CA 92116 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 109 room hotel. LOCATION: South side of Hwy 111, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE• PC(4) S.P. Mr. Sawa advised commission that applicant had requested that this item be continued at this time. Moved by commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Holden to continue Case 239C indefinitely. Carried unanimously 3-0. • 1A AGENDA ITEM NO. III-B-2 DATE: September 25, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108 and Jeseph M. Piscotta, AIA, 4470 Park Blvd #103, San Diego, CA 92116 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 109 room hotel. LOCATION: South side of Hwy 111, approximately 680 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. DISCUSSION: The site is a 2.27 acre site fronting on Hwy 111 at the easterly city boundary. This parcel is part of a larger 7.28 acre site that has been divided into 4 parcels (three for hotels and one for a restaurant). The project is laid out with four identical buildings with parking spread out through the site. In addition, there is a small meeting room structure near the pool area. ARCHITECTURE: The buildings are two stories in height and Spanish in nature. The exterior materials consist of stucco walls, wrought iron railing, dark wook trim and mission tile roofing. Bridging and connected to the two front buildings is a stucco Porte cochere with a tile roof. The roof plans indicated there is sufficient solar protection of glass areas. LANDSCAPING: A preliminary landscaping plan has been submitted which indicates species and general locations. The plans appear to be acceptable provided sizes are sufficiently large and varied in location. SIGNS: No signage has yet been proposed. This will therefore have to be reviewed by the commission at a later date. PLANNING COMMISSION: The precise plan for this item is scheduled to be reviewed by the Planning Commission at the meeting of October 2, 1984. RECOMMENDATION: The plans appear to be generally acceptable to staff from a technical standpoint. The commission should review the plans to determine acceptability. Should the I commission approve this request, it should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. Approval is subject to approval of PP 84-39. Prepared by: C�07 OF F)AL LN BE81 f4 $5 2a6 Pr Pw Ltna, ?Cm Dssmr4, Ce 2=80 DESIGN REVIEW BOAR] : deparlmuft ci 7oQ9vlQ+DGBQ4 snw seeydas. a MR, GARY L E'c.DS ,91 CAMINO DE LA 1EINA SUITE 1001 519-299-0222 "ling Addran I elepmeme SAN 91EGO CALIFORNAI 012108 Cry staftzip-caft REOUEST! (Desctbe sperinc ratan df approve( requestad ). PROPOSED ;1OTEU ONE STORY BUILDING, MEETING ROOM AND TOILETS, FOUR TWO STORY BUILDINGS WITH 109 GUEST UNITS, ONE MANAGE?, PROPERTY OESCRIPTION: AN UNIMPROVED 2.27 A .R° SITE FRONTmi; nN HinH Ay 1ll ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0. EXISTING ZONING PC4-P Property 0"" Aumort=atton The undartagned $n/es flat mey arm Mte aemer W of the property described Marvin and Mrotry qlv• uutne linden for the MMrp of MN ap«Laatidi . un"T ausomnq Tne Lay of fnlnl Ue"m of all liabilities ralattve to any deed reattlCfiona. I DO RY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, AAolw no City of Palm Oxcart of all I100111"W regarding any deed rastrscllon Mat MaY be (3pplkaab Ie Me praaarly described Mae eln. Appilcanf s Sigrmmm :)R STAFF USE ONLY) F-wranmsntal Stotus ❑ Mlnist/Mat ACT ❑ Categancal Eiernpnan ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Other Signature Date — IS-eq Data — Aaeepted by$ QAZIE HQe 3q c. Reference Case No. PP494-7A Design Review Of: CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS can CASE NO. Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development of thts project.shail conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services.. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed: Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed as required by Municipal Code. Signature Date) Department of Environmental Services Form Is The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. DEPARTMENT DESIGN ^ PLANNING OF ENVIRON- REVIEW i—\ COMMISSION TION MENTAL 80ARD L� (APPROVES OR SERVICES (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT) STAFF INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS PROCESSING SCHEDULE: a COURTS DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND CONS_; J SAFETY ION SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan check. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. STAFF USE ONLY: ate Received Date of ACTOR Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFIEI Staff ORB P.C. C.C. Department of Environmental Services Form la CASE NO. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CHECKLIST INITIAL PLAN REVIEW NOTE: Planning Division Staff are required to reject applications if any applicable exhibits are not received and checked. I. Completed Application Form (one (1) copy) II. Address labels for project sponsors (two (2) copies, gummed labels & typed list) Not required for a single-family dwelling application, or staff approved signs. III. Detailed Plot Plan A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/Approval A. - Three-(3) full size (one (1) of which is to be colored) - One (1) reduced copy (8j"x1l", or 1311) B. Staff Approval B. Three (3) full size IV. Information Sheet and/or Plan Block V. Site Analysis & Preliminary Drainage and Grading Plan (Three (3) copies, may be com- bined, where appropriate, with plot plan) VI. Architectural Elevations (all sides of the building(s)) A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/ Approval A. L� - Three (3) full size (one (1) of which is to be color keyed) - One (1) reduced copy (8j"x1l" or 13") B. Staff Approval B• - Three (3) full size 4 DRB Checklist Page Two ** VII. Sign Program (elevation(s) and details, if applicable) - Three (3) copies to scale VIII. Color and Material Exhibits - Color and Materials written description (one (1) copy) -, Color and Materials sample board (max. 8"x1311, 3/8" thick) IX. Floor and Roof Plans - Three (3) copies to scale * X. Landscape Plan (3 copies, 1 colored) - Plant List, (1 copy) * XI. Exterior Lighting Plan (3 copies) XII. Filing Fee A. Commission Review/Approval ($50.00) A. Q B. Staff approval, single-family dwellings ($15.00) B. u C. Sign Program Only ($15.00 DRB or C. u $10.00 Staff) * Items X and XI may be combined. ** Sign Program only - submit items IIIB, VI, VII, VIII, and Sign Fee. Initial Plan Exhibits Received and Checked by: / Ping. Div. Staff Da.t FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS I. Three (3) copies of drawings to be submitted for plan check. Drawings must reflect all Conditions of Approval. Final Construction Drawings Received by: / Ping. Div. Staff Date COLOR AND MATERIAL EXHIBIT FOR VACATION INN PALM DESERT ROOF MISSION ROOF TILES 9 "CALIFORNIA TILE 'ESPANA'" #106 MISSION RED FLASHED WOOD TRIM WOOD TRIM ROUGH SAWN OLYMPIC STAIN NEW BARK FULL BODY STAIN EXTERIOR WALLS EXTERIOR STUCCO MONO LITE O X 409 PROVINCIAL WINDOWS ALUMINUM SLIDING WINDOWS WINDOW MASTER DARK BRONZE ANODIZED METAL TRIM WROUGHT IRON FENCE HANDRAILS AND METAL TRIM FRAZEE PAINT #16 BURNT ORANGE 1 ``, 1984 Planning • ArchfbCtwo • Engh aaring ,`.,,.i�;ji,jryp;IENTAL SERVIC. ;;ITY Of: pALM DESERT 4470 Park Ord., Sulta 103 San Olago, Calif. 92116 (714) 245-2127 Member: American Institute of Architects • CongtniCUW Sp*CW46tfon6 In6titub 1a�O/e C O Oivinctwe Sipnage am<e 1p5t Aetffi CALHOUN ST. 16tp1 ]a]35g5 IN010, CAUFORNU 94pgt NS-1155 R1 CONTRACTORS JOB LOCATION P I j L P%�� y c' DRAWN BY Y.p may` DESCRIPTION 5� F / L rr� / N f°� `: �• 5 /�� N This is an orlgi�l unpublished drawing. crested EY IMPERIAL SIGN. It in auEmltted for Your Perri ma In conirocllon .,in a SIGN. Eeing Planned for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. 11 la notrga to ti en or i to to beanyone out pro sideyourpied or exhibon,ited nor is It to be lesbian. tlueed, copied or aznlelted In anylmnldn. — MEMBER — ,/■�1• U c.w.w�era�u,�u. CITY LIC. NO. p q CUSTOMEWFIPM ADDRESS _ ! / DRAWING NO. P I WOPItMANS COMP. NO. ^t 4et f• It f �/ Y n k„ �=l 7 � /+1 CUSTOMEWFIRM NAME ! f/++^��rf CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE GATE " SCALE NOTa`e:. N aonLnn YHO T ZT—aiU' ==7 m rvc)1-r.;4, i 9'- O plev x - Irpor - 4�A;e L ,5/ T ly) EYAL fi0✓S/ L"ems %2A�'�SFC2ir;cFs ELT tifEp N 7"4/QE "G FACE S s rf: iv o F K Sad 4D ar �t lo7D� /• 'jaiGit� `m Inc.? �/��ny Co DIbPnCLre Spnape v^ce 1%1 a6 ROCALHOUN ST IEt813a RJ5661 IN010. CA:IcpRNIA 8IAT1 d151155 CONTRACTORS LIC NO '1 .� ) 0 7/ G JOB LOCATION �.fi L /Yj T.:;� G �c y DRAWN By 7fl,,.� DESCRIPTION 5 /� I' M 1 y / /� / L V ' / ! I I�' / �, 6G' S / This 1a .n P„DIMI Pnouaanb d,.ernp. created CY IMPERIAL SIGN 11 a .u0mitt m, your Personal ... m cannoeOP, wnn a SIGN 1Demo P10n IPryW Oy IMPERIAL SIGN I: le not 10 Ue sn^e•^ 1v 1. W v DUL in.due your Prp.mz.nPn, nor u a tP M iop Oucb, comb o, a•mD•tb m my t.anlPn. —MEMBER — p C�Sa ❑ ' ' CITY LIC NO. Vn� ^ Q V G r / CUSTOMERiFIRM ADDRESS_ u' ! y / DRAWING NO. •#. WCRNMANS COMP NO _ 4 d C' I �i CUSTOMERIFIRM NAME � � rn. � T •' L ivy � /V � �,�� I CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE I GATE / / / T SCALE Q —1\ VaC�ort�t'i HOI'EL•?iLb�DEaAT m T e5-ceV Agripnl FitZOA)7,V I E - /;Z5- L. /N. /- 7 : vm;t-'�JzcO ScF7a r SCE - �k EfN $GG• G s�•�� T r,-I_ rf L�1 CITY y P,,ALM DESERT ram' I ti' EN4 SERVICES E O /J 7 J G e- APPROVED MY: ❑C.C.RL3.No. I I P.C_RES. O. PG E-x Ft9 CIE STAFF LETTER f. D.R-3. AC71OP4 FORM i /-,-�_111 577.9NCr-Kd7 — S �C T/ c fJ 6 /C nJ NOWRP I I . 11 � o S ID .1. (l .� � kfa cr L4 MM AMI SO I MW 11 14 11W 1111W LAM3 a 'Jr C) K> �, y C_ EEE - =ET. _ 30 I I % I 30 ao I 7 ^ {•l. I I � � 'n .-. ; II �1+ i I ••-{,�,..�{1� � r{+ ',' :. i ,' � r•r r•^:... ..1, � .. � I I I � — ; i I L �rv-�.'� Lill"f I-?.,7G`,7-r i2 Yt � II —_-:...i.-.+� � '1„���..H.'-�I�� I _�.'ac�'CC�'1 L!•�.EiLiri_hl � I y,�i� ^I � � _.. _ - i � I E-1 �,- - - _ I I I 1 I , fil Cll' �C ❑ d❑ I u G I I n r— Ilif-11 it T" NORZ. MXP. 2 - I'.- —• lar.Tr „ 411" TYP 5 — I I I C• L..... I 1 - E° TCG�O 'E �� "�', ll i['i tij? ' �rF--'i (•7 CI� Cld 1 t IC RC,!- il-- ARC�iS;i T.!'P _. � - I. � �.i e`�-'��il J -1�— I ��-� �� PPOIZT 5 ,�' L II(j n rannn _ — 15 8'XG EYhiAUST r..0UVER I - - u�iVEREG PxR PAINT TO MATCH STUCCO - 2G TYP Is- FLMR, TYF' l c. ... o, V OL T�( [ y DRYER EXHA' r.T FLU 20 J t / TILtT Ta MAT4H Ra>, ,r^�''I- frYP 12 I i TILK�__ GC U ETE E Piet P' r-rf-- - CM (S)PER -.AFT 3\ --rPci {) A� �j I r I 2 TvP, r_II�!L..� I� II i �''i�' a�.1� Ir r I STAItiJED (LCiL.OR E-Y ARGP r f I � I - 1 I p .I IjTT I t.olza: ICI l' ji r^AIN"E:DaLGlr2 tuic _ I __ _ - I T,'�]�'�'� W CI I ti =-.i 'I IIII'I' I'illII'll ia� Itl, I' lll�'I��'�. Ja��I. 51 , - 15 p 2 P t I �2g J3 y, 10 I J. - alunim t� -------- --- SLIDING GLASS kVR W/ DCLlUL_F bLAZttA0 �' ------- ---- !cAs- IJCRrH EL�V. 3Ll A Ohl LY 16 �i4 ..1-: `, {2' DE'KPAIGNES 251M ,rrn j N— @TOWER TYP. All ideas, designs, arrangements and plans indicated or represented by PROJECT TITLE this'drawing are owned by, and the property of. Joseph M. Pisciotta, VACATION r Architect, and were created. evolve" and developed for use es and r- T H E • F3 A. C A T 1 O N I N N HOTEL connection with, the specified project None of such ideas, Cosigns ar� • !Y rangements or plans shall be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm PALM or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission 1 H PALM ®E S E R T ., CALIFORNIA of Joseph M. Pisciotta, Architect. Written dimensions on these drawings shall have precedence over scaled dimensions Contractors shall verity and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions on the job, and this office must be notified of any variations from the dimensions and coral.F' O R ; VACATION INNS OF A €wa+i E R I C A lions shown by These OrawiaQs. -- IxjUM C (sLAZ1r.JF •TYPICAL tlolTl"N ELEVAT'IDN I PLANNING ARCHITECTURE JOSEPH M, PISCIOTTA A 1-;A 4470 PARK BLVD. SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO,,CALIFORNIA 92716 r' .! _ 15Z r u' I Y, I IZ TY� IZ 'J I !' I •�Y'P � corzR, f a 3RG FLOOR 2_"1O FLOOR 1ST_ _ FLOOR .enj�rlm�arlA-- __ I � 7, 17. 09 e-Ml C ii-f Av, 140. DATE BY REVISIONS ENGINEERING DRAIYN BY at; PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. A R C H T E C T ARCHITECT/ BY HIT RCHITECj CALIF No•t-3999 OF TELEPHONE 619-295-2127 I DATEI ■ 1 Sit-0 r1a1 � n , . 6elinctive Slonaoe vote reel - a612o CALIFORNIA92ST. (Sfof 345A155 INDIO, OPNIA 92Po1 ]a5�1155 PNTR�1 4LI` / o JOB LOCATION p /? L n� Y DRAWN BY 70 �+ DESCRIPTION 5/ A / L L v M ! N �7 7 45 C S /C1 A) troll is an original SIGN,l11 15 drawing, mitred for your personal notto use In connection with a created eiIMPEPoALSIGN.ItleIMPERIAL protect ONnp planned rar you by IMPERIAL SIGN. It Is not to on shown to anyone out. side your oroarizatlon, nor is It to e6 more luceq copied.r eanibited merry fashion. — nneenBew a E — CYS8 k� CITY LIC NO. rv� ^ �� � Q V - y y, / ` CUStOMERIFIRM AODflE55 W i iWI / NO. �R. ] Olit / WORBMANS COMP. NO. -.j; s� 7/ � (� a r II [� y; J +� / CUSTOMERIFIRM NAME Ir 1 "'Tt / '`� � //"'�'� CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE SCALE �aT� ^- {I / `)/-O P P, ee 0y �ISINONWCr Cy96C,/e S q T IN 6Y/?L L F•' � r C k iYJ c Fs a '. J D 7` V Q S- Vacatianlnn ���rn ... -: - s �,� c y STA�JDA/0'4 —1 F nn '- -- _ ►vary; ,y - APeaX / era F,e0N7'gcS� /PL,�" L/N. /=3`. SECT/DN � �I ial 5�,r��' Company �'ry OisllncUva Slgnape alnce 1B61 e6t2O CALHOUNST. I61919eT 1568 INDIO. CALIFORNIA 9 l 1151155 CONTRACTORS LIO. NO a o 7l 3 G }� !l JOB LOCATION /�' z'-1 ,� t 6:c 5 �' l Y—MEMBER DRAWN BY 7Q�'1 DESCRIPTION S C /,r{ y / / !G G v ry / w r ? c 516,A) This Is an original unpuollehed drawing, ea fcalledor you by IMPERIAL SIGN. t is ion with in connection by IM with a too your personal planned SIGN.I being t to Wa far you by IMPERIAL SIGN. 11 n not to Ee shown I anyone out side your organization, nor IN it to be repro- aocea, copied or exhibited many Fashion — G a CeSa S CITY LIE. N0. a�3 0 76 l 7 CUSTOME WFIRM ADDRESS _ w f w 0!) _ DRAWING NO. WOgNMANS COMP. NOh. ] / a �/ ( ,,. / . ` e CUSTOMERIFIRM NAME C ' ` rx % L "r � lam" F �� CUSTOMER APPROVAL PNONE DATE ` � .. ? � SCALE M -1 / 9'- o PPao >'• a[oil9of �gral1 LVAM81iNWMe, I��iil T IV'Api"Fan/ F2oN1`rJl,E OPS L/Na Pr- �` E�A2 &tA/ 5-06• D IA; Ili e G $Ncc 7 17)6"7`AL /,/�✓s/ti'C, r o/c L %/ZFiNSr�J�/Y;cE'S fi N a S c` W / 2 /yV !� j• NEON 7v43E' �G FX FA C a - —7 57ANVAKa NFonJ A-10U,51N 4r) , TENNIS COUR TENNIS COUR C IN trash lb r ,r%nNSTRUCTION NOTES STAMPED CONCRETE TO BE A 6X6" COBBI,ESTONE PATTERN. COLOR P.,Y SCOFI:CLD #C-15 COACHLLLA SAND. USE 6X6" WOVEN -: WERE MESHFOtz REINFORCEMENT. _.. :. v. ALL WALKS TO BE 3-'-�" TIIICK COLORP:,D CONCRETE WITH A MEDTIIPI SALT FINISH, COLOR BY SCOFIELD IIC-12 MESA BEIGE. r ALL STEPPING STONES TO BE 2X2' PRECAST CONCRETE W:[TH MEDIUM SALT FINISH. COLOR TO [MATCH WALKS. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE A MAXIMUM OF 10' APART. KEYNOTES OTENNIS COURT - SEE ARCHITECT'S PLAN. AREA - SEE ARCHITECT'S PLAN. CONCRETE PATIO - SEI' AI:CIIIIECT'S PLAN. n PLANTING AREA -,SEE ARCHTTECT'S PLAN. \"�) ``/ CONCRETE WALK - SEE ARCHITECT'S PLAN. „ `� CONCRETE STRIP - SEE ARCHITECT'S PLAN. O NMI I r�I p i /9R I •::•.,:: D 5. � I8"F2'il'P. III• R POOL LAYO E O V Y W 4) •. C�P �t POSED RESTAURANT SI- L. ' p, IGN ITM TAll2� (p Dr-; 4 17�p I/l.�GdNG pJ'ANl7- A7X0V6 GENERAL NOTES Dimension shall take precedence over scale; any dimension or site condition which precludes completion of this work as per plan.shall be brought to the attention of the Landscape Architect prior to the commencement. of the work. All concrete to obtain a minimum compressive streng-tIn of 2000 psi @ 28 days. Verify with project site engineer the need for reinforcing, base material, presaturation, tec. for walks', pool decks, wall footings, etc. All materials and construction to conform to applicable, governing codes and ordinances. Paving and concrete contractor to coordinate and cooperate with electrician, drain line contractor and irrigation contractor for sleeving, piping and conduit under all paving. Slope concrete a min of 1€ away from pool, spa and all structures. • Any discrepancies on the construction plan should be brought to the attention of the Landscape Architect prior to install- tion. Landscape Architect bears no responsibility for installation errors made without his observation or ccns'iltation. ,f I .,'.�,.pt ••jS 1 L :.: .,:•x;.• fir., I •• tV � •• ':1:1f Y, AZtill: V j:L•1 Jt�1 V'il ::. I i a: coNe. . I �iNi��'f i, Gc(•c-�2 rvY �.,��Etrt� FINIsH �w�� -r�-12 M�5dA III �Cr'`fp-) ALL • J�1NL15 5"I1- CsAlo �XF Jp1NT rr T � CGMI��G'r SI.ICCaR� EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL W d N T L c N do Z .. •.LU aCr o a � r T O � } Q p LU 0_ Q SUGGEST D Lid ENTRY SIGN, CITE' (37 ....� L .....0 A�4y 1 CY NORTH 1'/:20'-0„ 0 -40 Z J z 0I: p .,iyf I:fiy IRMO- A f f C f � 4 L, Z L.- F�I Q ZU } ':. O W . C.n aCL ria, Sig �Pany In�� CODISIlnctwe Stgnage since 1961 s6120 CALHOUN ST (6191347-3586 1N DID. CALIFORNIA 11 201 3451155 CONTRACTORS I J / t, r r JOBLOCATION �J C- / • r GIC i DRAWN BY �A �,. N I. DESCRIPf1ON �/ �� ,� N : '. )'') p I (% �'} p^ `' M r' • C / 5 fM / x j i �' This is an original ue,.bl,,h.d ar.wln9, for your personal use In can nactlan with a pmelae being IMPERIAL SIGN.II byIMPERIAL SIGW II project b fI notltonned for you be Shown to anyone oul side your organization. nor in 11 to Da repro duce0, coplao or exhitem in any fashion. — MEMBER �M�ao EYNtSI�AItICM� — PS CITY LIC. N0. . j �} /- j CUSTOMERIFIgM AOORE65 _ J aM c•�1 • J DRAWING N0. RA F_ WORNMiANNS COMP, NO /s x") �. 17 4.' y CUSTOMERIFIRM NAME �-7 Zw % / l"� % N / N CUSTOMER APPROVAL PHONE DATE /D 4 / 7 _�� SCALE /L1-0 e //jj t YA I �♦ J it MEWS No b9 E '0IFF PAP n11 R T ENV t ;a By , car43Ta PUZ yr-st ear a sr:a:s teal rare 63- I tTrN Isar�a�v�L CUNT RACTURS LIC. NO / JOB LOCATION r DRAWN BY ►m InV ► ]I.. CITY LTC. NO. /� CUSTOMERIFIgM ADDRESS 7 7 ]:�I ff lT (.{J � 1 t j ORAWTN COmPaG NO Distinctive Signage elnce filet WORNMANS COMP(NOO CUSTOMER FIRM NAME �r^i Y� + q r 46120 CALHOUN ST (6t9130d59e ^ MA 9 � ^"Ci " %L� CUSTOMER API INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201 Ja5.n56 4.2 0 y /0-17 This is an original unpuWiebetl craning, created IMP ERIAL M bl use In N. I Y O Ile Dubnittetl IPryoureina planned In connection IM ERba SIGN being t to be for you by IMPERIAL SIGN. II is organization, aT to ba ebown 10 anyone pout ro. alEe your pied or exhib nor is It 10 be repro tlucetl, caPleO or ecbiEnatl In any fashion. flLOcs` !C"s`I, - MEMBER - PS I GlArno EYctrk Sip AuKiMI� Ts'."`}�:'.�" lesl,'FLit;F_ii� r4i`F�k: -"_ .. �kS� ii.d .:'F;Gx_;fa�'g,BiY#a�•.r_��-=::'g.w _. ......_ �.'_,...�wr.,� R. 4 r1 p pe, 9te"r �� brtmct n5pege since t%1 'NOPhMANS GOMp. NO r r �,.r%PJf(rE/��./ CUSTCMEP PPPf 1!gCMEfUf IPM hFME <6t�GlPWNS (6:31..yam] / �7- i. I^i OI�.UllF09Nu :2[a1 :MSn;S � °`C / Re gi]-L it 3 Nq (,P,04 o� r0vS, CavC2� rc I �Ga Ti/'✓C� _ 414ym1&I/-]7 - _. - --_ _ -__. ._......�_' ..,,.� �-._�...�-�,.•. - -_ __.w,a.m....n.�.�a-..ram-n.�n-meTv xs.rr a'^sv:�r VGiVf111•I.IUIY oo,c 'o es - — MEMBER —' i en OanF p m ne e e np. I pGR.\ l .1 . ttid e C IIAL la yW pICFOniI n c0. Y e I VPjW, iPtM i. u vJ 1 yT by IMPERIAL t I. t I11. SIGN If1a /Wlinb etp n SIGN. i 1. "oW e,,"d. OIpTn'•W n. IMI II II Ip �! TprO- OUGOG. GAp�TE CI TYI4GIIeC in inY 1elNi0n. �APYF»f i i�Nilf�1 j caa'� 7 sec7,10 SCALD /a w 7 lip .2 F((,LE r`2AM6 ---- 2 A C 6, w[ Y !� 3f-z.FSi f;;Wc-4)ti, s /z; &/ OC A 7�1OnJ VACA7'/0 4,; /N!1 j