The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About246C MONTEREY PARTNERSHIP73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 January 11, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISION ACTION CASE NO: 246 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MONTEREY PARTNERSHIP, 64 San Sebastian, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270; CHARLES MARTIN, 73-725 El Paseo, Palm Desert Ca; 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final landscape plan approval. LOCA`fION: Southeast corner Monterey and Fred Waring Drive. ZONE: OP (office professional) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission minute motioned this case. Date of Action: January 8, 1985 Vote: I Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Martin abstaining) (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION JANUARY 8, 1985 10. CASE NO: 246 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MONTEREY PARTNERSHIP, 64 San Sebastian, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270; CHARLES MARTIN, 73-725 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final landscape plan approval. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey and Fred Waring. ZONE: Office Professional 11. CASE NO: 178 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DESERT EVANGILICAL FREE CHURCH, 73-730 Highway III, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of revised elevations. LOCATION: South side of Hovley Lane between Monterey and Portola. ZONE: PR-5 III. CASES: 1. CASE NO: 239 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GARY LEEDS, 591 Camino De La Reina #1001, San Diego, CA 92108; JOSEPH PISCOTTA, 4470 Park Blvd. #103 San Diego, CA 92116. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of landscape plans for a 128 room hotel. LOCATION: South side Highway 111, approx. 680 feet east of Shadow Hills. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Commission noted that the landscaping plan did not indicate sizes. Commissioner Gregory noted that the minimum size of landscaping should be 15 gallon with the 15 gallon material should not exceed 1/3 of total trees installed. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve Case No. 239 C subject to the following condition: 1. That landscaping should be a minimum of 15 gallon material with the 15 gallon material should not exceed 1/3 of total trees installed. 2. CASE NO: 281 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): DESERT SPRINGS TENNIS RESORT INC. CIRCLE Z INC., 73-700 Highway 111 #9, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary architectural approval of plans for a 156 unit condominium project. LOCATION: Northeast corner Cook and Hovely. ZONE: PR-5 S.P. Commission indicated that this project would need additional blow sand protection. Mr. Diaz stated that he is requesting that they receive specific fire marshal approval of the emergency fire access way at Via Cinta. Commissioner Gregory informed applicant that the erythrina will not grow in this area., . He. also, noted that a minimum size of 15 gallon should be used with the total of 15 gallons not to exceed 1/3 of total landscaping. -4- 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 November 30, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 246 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MONTEREY PARTNER SHIP, 64 San Sebastian, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270; CHARLES MARTIN, 73-725 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of landscape plans for an office building. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey and Fred Waring Drive. ZONE: OP (office professional) Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commission minute motioned this case. Date of Action: November 27, 1984 Vote: Carried unanimously 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. CONTINUED 3. CASE NO: 164 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): CARVER MANAGEMENT CORP.; 110 W. Las Tunas Drive, San Gabriel, CA 91776; BERNIE LEUNG, 7390 El Paseo, Suite 4, Palm Desert, CA 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for building "E" in Plaza de Monterey. LOCATION: Southeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Country Club Drive. ZONE: PC (2) Commission granted preliminary approval with the following conditions to be imposed: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the city fire marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. That all condtions of DP 01-82 shall be met. 4. CASE NO: 239 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): THE LAKES COUNTRY CLUB NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: LOCATION: ZONE: 5. CASE NO: 246 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MONTEREY PARTNERSHIP, 64 San Sebastian, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270; CHARLES MARTIN, 73-725 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of lan scape plans for an office building. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey and Fred Waring Drive. ZONE: O.P. (office professional) III. CASES: A. Preliminary Plans: 1. CASE NO: 279 MF APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PALM DESERT PARTNERS, c/o JPH ENTERPRISES, 83-612 Avenue, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 104 unit apartment complex. LOCATION: Corner of Hovley Lane and Beacon Hill ZONE: AHDPR-18 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOVEMBER 13, 1984 CONTINUED Mr. Outcault said that if the roof was brought around the east elevation it should bring the building back some. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook to grant - preliminary approval subject to further study of location of building. Motion carried 4-0. 2. CASE NO: 246 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MONTEREY PARTNERSHIP, 64 San Sebastian, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270; CHARLES MARTIN, 73-725 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of pinas for an office building. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey and Fred Waring Drive. ZONE: O.P. (office professional) Mr. Smith presented this case to the commission noting some concerns with landscaping. There are trees near the parking area to be planted on residents property and to be maintained by the residents. Also there is no landscaping in the parking area. Commissioner Holden noted that there is an ordinance which states that parking areas must have landscaping. Commissioner Gregory suggested putting some office space on the bottom floor instead of having all parking. He noted that reducing the square footage of the building might help also. Mr. Moss thought that putting the trees up on the residents property would be a convenience to the residents. Commissioner Gregory stated that this was an unsatisfactory approach. He thinks the landscaping should be on their property and be their respon- sibility. Commissioner Holden stated that the project would be more attractive if more landscape was put on the side and rear of the building. Mr. Drell noted that the residents would like to see the same treatment as the front of the building is receiving on the landscaping. Commissioner Cook noted that the city has given alot to this project and isn't receiving much out of it. He suggests bringing trees into the parking lot and adding more trees into the parking area and the side of the building. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Leung to approve preliminary plans subject to conditions. Carried 3-1 (Commissioner Gregory opposed) 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the design review board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 4 MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION NOVEMBER 13, 1984 CONTINUED 3. That the walls at the parking entrance be changed to colums. 4. Additional landscaping to parking area and side of building be added. IV. ADJOURNMENT: /dig The meeting was adjourned at 2:55 p.m. STEVE SMITH, Asfociate 151anner 5 AGENDA ITEM N0: III-0-1 DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION CASE NO• 246 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): MONTEREY PARTNERSHIP, 64 San Sebastian, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270; CHARLES MARTIN, 73-725 E1 Paseo, Palm Desert, Ca 92260 NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for an office building. LOCATION: Southeast corner Monterey and Fred Waring Drive. ZONE: O.P. (office professional) DISCUSSION: The applicant is in the process of changing the general plan and zoning for the property to office professional and has received the endorsement of planning commission. ELEVATIONS• The proposed building is one story over one level of parking. Total height above grade will be 25 feet except for elevator areas which are 28'feet. The building is contemporary in architecture and has recessed windows along Monterey (west).and Fred Waring (north). Wrapping around the street portions of the building will be an architectural projection which breaks up the expense of the long building and which provides solar protection. LANDSCAPING: A landscape plan has not been provided as of the writing of this report, however, the areas to be landscaped are delineated on the site plan and the rendering. A detailed landscape plan will be required in order to obtain final plan approval. RECOMMENDATION: That the commission review the plans for Case 246 C, MONTEREY PARTNERSHIP, and determine acceptability. Should commission decide to grant preliminary approval it should be subject to the following conditions: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the design review board. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and con- struction shall have been completed. CITY OF PALM DESERT MOOT RECERY 00,04 RECEIVED OF: DATE It�/ji-'IS AMOUNT S�(� FOR CCU— "`'^ 1 � V l c— CHECKS ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO BANK CLEARANCE Devno potK,.�, lr kl`! {"�•:ar I .In,• 1"alrn ,.....•r l (�.e 17l"))f..Ib l i A (I t•r r J {-'t•r {-; W1 �.L • �.:..r r I n L.• o f .� i .•nsir:.�nnt..•`I.el ..,its... {•I.ani„n.•r atvi+l�«n >J—<L' I Al ft�. , I, Tilepnon ^�� wry ry State Zlp REQUEST: 10*� ttt�Wedfic rmlu/n�of (:ppovcl rpu"red)• PROPERTY OESCRIPT)ON: ASSESSORS PARCEL NC. EXISTING ZONING Prop My Ovnef du MorL2d 1!ff for m I atotee tifor rtry on the o r W of rlre filing ot,M�e opollootbn. and Iwreby give outno wwm.nf aasorvrrp In, City of f�Im Oeaxrt of all IWbllitla relorlw ro arty deed reeirl erlone, Dar. -- I DO By VY SIGNATlJRE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Al tM pry of Polm pesert of al lia Glltlp a/b. aCdkaGN b M. property daalbod h ony do" ra.frlefloni �Gry zj Wonarun Uari��` AppOeont a Slgrwrun - CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review Of: CASE NO. kAppiicant) cement of compliance toe si bgned by those applying for review. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development -of this project shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed: Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed as required by Municipal Code. Signature -- Date j---`—'-- Department of Environmental Services Forrn 18 NELV 11CA, ';toLl) 11�, �Fl�> -141 Q C17Y PAL M, DESERT J❑ Si L '-TER C:a YEAR GF PHIaA€''+� I CITY OF PALM DESERT DEPART ME LA t &SAFE APPR/J'/ 9 p THIS PPROVAL DECONES NULL 8 VOIO IF INSPEC- TION /8 NOT RECORDED WITHIN 100 DAY6 OF IS$U- ANOE. AlL WORK SHALL 6E ❑ONE IN ACOOflD0 -TE bYITH hp?ROVED PLFNS. T:IIg APPFlOVAL SHALL NOT Z. OONS'TRUED T DE / F`1f 11T FOR'. AN APPROVAL [F- ANV V101P1 �U / -T OF THE PPCVISIONS OF 6TATE 6 CITT 3 OR LAMS OF APPROVED V f 1G'i cE KEPT OIJ NHL J07 UNTIL COMPI. D i. 4�..Sa J:. � .r t41sF;'vsQ :'t.• 'r s ��::\ .r �:4-.....-4'♦ �i�•. I �rvgW'/' r s-��'eRwv-. Li. i� i� `O h i 5 4 �1♦ ♦i"i`tiw :L. �'�`? �.::L:✓✓f�i.ri!',ue•' p'�./i'�3 `' I +y I� ;•y VJ^ +,�'� 7�'•i::"s� �':.�° �iis'.•J-''d`.Id�'''.��"rS�1`ti��:�a :3 - r. Set. ,;� _�. i f S. _.�i� � _�.��aQh�'.Pl��,.`.'�i�'•., .•.!.- .r f ram' » � • �`, PAW ,RCH, ITECT HARL ES L. MARTIN _72d EL PASEO SUITE 24C ►LM [DESERT, CA. 92260 346 4090 i `3 A'Ps n$f ':' Eli • ®C.C.�:_;,.'0.� li D.tG-4. K;FC.'S FQP��i Data or � I