The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About249C GRANADA ROYALE HOMETELu z=r 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 January 9, 1986 Continental Inn Attn: Wayne 74-675 Highway III Palm Desert, CA 92260 RE: Landscaping at front of hotel. Dear Wayne: Pursuant to my discussion on January 8, 1986, with Rudy Salazar, this is to confirm that nerium oleander `petite pink' five gallon size, planted a maximum three feet on center to screen the parking area from Highway III is acceptable. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, Stan Sawa Principal Planner /tm INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM CITY OF PALM DESERT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Department of Community Development/Planning SUBJECT: Signage for Vacation Inn and Continental Inn DATE: October 10, 1985 September 10, 1985 the architectural commission reviewed the sign program requests from Vacation Inn and Continental Inn. In each case a freestandina monument sign was requested. Staff advised architectural review commission that the signs as proposed do not comply with code provisions relating to signs. Commission, at the suggestion of staff, continued the cases to allow council to review the matter to determine if there is any option open other than out -right denial of the freestanding monument signs. SIGN REGULATIONS: Municipal code Title 25, Chapter 68 regulates signs in the city. Sections 310 and 390 (copies attached) specifically address themselves to freestanding signs. Section 310 specifically limits itself to the general commercial zone Ile: C1). Under very limited circumstances (le: when the building or complex location or configuration or topographical variation or other similar circum- stance preclude the effective use of a sign on the building) a freestanding sign may be permitted. Section 390 permits freestanding signs in addition to wall signs In district shopping centers, regional shopping centers and industrial parks (PC-2, PC-3 and SI zones). The size of these freestanding signs is limited to 10 square feet per acre In the center to a maximum of 100 square feet. In addition and most importantly a minimum of 3-1/2 acre size limit is imposed. As can be discerned the PC (4) zone which permits hotels and which is the zoning of the subiect property is not specifically addressed. The Embassy Suites Hotel (formerly Granada Royale) sign was processed under section 390. It's 9.2 acre site was therefore entitled to up to 92 square feet. The sign, as aooroved was 80 square feet. It is staff's position that it is appropriate to use section 390 for the PC (4) zone because the zone has a minimum 4 acre property size limit. The intent being that a property in the zone will be developed in a unified fashion and the property or center can then be identified by a freestanding sign. In the case when an individual business occupies a PC (4) property then that business would be eligible for its own freestanding sign. In this instance to the who 1 e 6 acre property (2 hotels and a restaurant) could be identified with a freestanding sign and each individual business have its own wall mounted identification. If it is the desire of council each business in the PC (4) zone could be entitled to its own freestanding sign. If this option Is selected then an appropriate code amendment along with noticed public hearings would need to be Processed through the planning commission and ultimately through the city council. In discussions with the city attorney's office it was felt that if the city wanted these hotels to have Individual freestanding signs then a variance Pursuant to the minimum acreage requirements of section 68.390 could be Processed and the necessary findings probably could be made. CONCLUSION: A. If it is the wish of the city that these hotels not have individual freestanding monument signs then no action is necessary and code as interpretted by staff will stand on it's own. B. If it is the wish of the city that these hotels be entitled to individual freestanding monument signs then the applicants could be directed to Process a variance to the provision of code section 68.390 which requires a minimum 3-1/2 acre site to be eligible for the sign. C. If it is the wish of the city that the code be amended to permit these hotels to have individual freestanding monument signs along with others who might fall into this situation then staff should be directed to process an appropriate amendment to the sign ordinance. 25.68.310--25.68.335 25.68.310 Freestanding signs. A. A building or com- mercial complex within the general commercial. zone with in- dividual street frontage shall be allowed one double faced or single faced freestanding sign per street frontage for tenant identification when the building or complex location or configuration or topographical variation or other similar circumstances preclude the effective use of a sign on the building but must have the explicit approval as to necessity, size and location of either the design review board, planning commission or city council. B. The scuare footage of one face of a double faced sign shall be counted; however, the scuare_ footage of such sign face shall in no case exceed one-half the total allowable sicnace of the front of the building and shall be subtracted therefrom. C. The area of such signs shall not exceed fifty scuare feet per face; and the height shall not exceed twelve feet. D. All detached signs shall be placed within a per- manently landscaped area of not less than twenty-four square feet; and be architecturally compatible with the building or comDlex; and.not encroach in the public right-of-way. E. Any freestanding sign conforming to the requirements of Section 25.68.310 as in effect on September 25, 1981, shall be considered exempted from these provisions until such time as the owner changes his sign copy. (Ord. 272 (part), 1981: Ord. 129 54(part), 1977: Ord. 98 51(part), 1975: Exhibit A $25.38-12.03(B)). 25.68.320 Second -story businesses. Businesses main- tained exclusively on the second floor of a two-story build- ing may be allowed up to fifty percent of the sign area authorized for businesses conducted in single -story buildings by the design review board process. (Ord. 129 94(part), 1977: Ord. 98 51(part), 1975: Exhibit A 525.38-12.04). 25.68.330 Sian for pedestrian traffic. Where the prin- cipal sign for a business is located so that it cannot be seen by pedestrian traffic, an identification sign, in addition to that otherwise allowed in this chapter, shall be permitted. Such a sign shall be no larger than three square feet (three feet on each side) and it shall be designed and located so as to not distract from the appearance of the building or violate the intent of this chapter. (Ord. 129 54(part), 1977: Ord. 98 51(part), 1975: Exhibit A 525.38- 12.05) .- 25.68.335 Dir businesses. Where designed contain courtyard or plaza tification sign is age, the commercial N�_ ----- -- - ". .W. wurL arq or Plaza commercial buildings or comp exes are tenant spaces oriented to an interior and where the principal business iden- located on that courtyard or plaza front - building or complex may be permitted 424 (Palm Desert 7/82) 25.68.390--25.68.395 currently being offered. 'Any special conditions required for sale at such lowest price shall also be indicated. (Ord. 129 54(part), 1977: Ord. 98 51(part), 1975: Exhibit A. 525.38-12.11). 23.68.3901 Signs in district and regional shopping centers and inaus real Darts. A. In acaataon to the wall sign area allowed for individual businesses, shopping cen- ters and industrial parks in excess of three and one-half acres of land shall be allowed one identification sicn on each right-of-way. Such signs shall not extend beyond the property line or into the right-of-way and shall be used solely to identify the shopping center, shopping area, or businesses and/or activities conducted therein. Relative to such signs, the allowable sign area shall be based on ten square feet of sign per acre. These signs shall not ex- ceed one hundred square feet, shall have a maximum height of twelve feet, and shall not be erected without first having proper approvalas provided in this chapter. B. Further, where the unique design of the center allows for adequate integration of a larger sign, the per- mitted pedestrian traffic signs as allowed in Section 25.68- .330 may be increased to a maximum of six square feet per side. (Ord. 272 (part), 1981: Ord. 129 54(part), 1977. Ord. 98 91(part), 1973: Exhibit A 525.38-12.12). 25.68.395 Building or building complex identification t_ signs in the general commercial distract. In as ataon to the wall sign area allowed for individual businesses, general commercial district buildings or building complexes which are designed to contain four or more distinct tenant spaces, may be allowed one identification sign on each right- of-way, or public access thoroughfare. Such signs shall not extend beyond the property line or into the right-of-way or thoroughfare, and shall be used solely to identify the build- ing or building complex. Relative to such signs, the maximum allowable sign area shall be based on the following: A. Up to fifty feet of frontage, three square feet of sign area; B. Over fifty feet of frontage, up to seventy-five feet, five square feet of sign area; C. Over seventy-five feet of frontage, up to one hundred feet, ten square feet of sign area; D. Over one hundred feet of frontage, maximum size of fifteen square feet. Buildings with frontage of one hundred-feet.or more shall be permitted a free standing sign, height not to exceed eight feet. (Ord. 272 (part), 1981: Ord. 22 92, 1980). 426-1 (Palm Desert 7/82) AGENDA ITEM NO: III-A-6 DATE: February 14, 1984 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 911 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GRANADA ROYALE HOMETEL, 74-700 Highway Ill, Palm Desert, California, 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of a free-standing monument sign. LOCATION: 74-200 Highway Ill. ZONE: PC (4), S.P. BACKGROUND: The applicant wishes to install a free-standing monument sign to be located 7Y2 feet north of the front property line west of the entrance to the hometel. The proposed monument and sign is to be 12 feet high and 18 feet in width. The sign itself sits atop the 6 foot 8 inch monument and has dimensions of 5 feet in height and 16 feet in width for an area of 80 square feet. The base of the sign is to be sheet metal covered with texturized paint to match the building (ivory). The sign itself is to have an ivory background with green and rust letters. The cabinet will be dark bronze. In the PC zone, monument sign size is limited by the acreage of the site. This site is some 9.2 acres which would entitle a 92 square foot sign. The sign as proposed conforms to size and height limits of the code. RECOMMENDATION: That the proposed monument sign for Granada Royale Hometel, Case 911 SA, be approved. LOCATM M TNq W ALL I lira lilt ow K IT Won WALL l� UrIM tl aAN y _ " t CITY" C`_ PALM DESERT RTME144T op -l-AZINTAL SrRVeCES *APPROVED BY: ❑C.C.RES. NO. O—P.C. RFS I STA'FF LETTER LD D.R_8. ACTION FORM BY _ �lsgUCTNjN G•vALLrL gCYYlNCt ■ITMIN" OV"R Of TNIt AMUYAL ■ aBa1N� • - '� \` ... �? ��'�� Sly � --� _ —,i _ _� 0 SC- b OAK L IYrq IpbAArt4 � �,_„ �C.•, i. c - %7Jl f \ - �e ,./ L v ou kgWaft " M4 a _ .... 1 a r ubr>tooe eul Y okaf June 4, 1985 Gf:ch'j�r oit :20m a , ,_ =®=orrt�v 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES (Continental Inn), 4350 Executive Drive, San Deigo, CA 92121; G.E. HOLGUIN be ASSOC., P.O. Box 13152, Tucson, AZ 85732. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of landscaping plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Rd. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural commission minute motioned this case. Date of Action: May 28, 1985 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. It is now your responsibility to submit approved, stamped plans to the department of building and safety. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY - MAY 28, 1985 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE L The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. after a one hour study session. Members Present: Ron Gregory, Chairman At Cook Rick Holden Bernie Leung Members Absent: Charlie Martin Staff Present: Ray Diaz Steve Smith Donna Gomez It was moved by Commissioner Leung, seconded by Commissioner Gregory to approve the minutes of the April 9, 1985 meeting as written. Carried 3-1 Commissioner Cook abstaining. It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Holden to approve the minutes of May 14, 1985 as amended. Carried 2-2 Commissioners' Gregory and Leung abstaining. II. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Holden to approve the following cases by minute motion. 4-0 (Commissioner Gregory abstaining from case 256C) 1. CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES (Continental Inn), 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 92121; G.E. HOLGUIN do ASSOC., P.O. Box 13152, Tucson, AZ 85732. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of landscaping plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Subject to the following: 1. That the street side landscaping also shown on Dunham plans be deleted. 2. Upsize trees to be used. 2. CASE NO: 243 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): COACHELLA VALLEY TV, 74-175 El Paseo, Palm Desert, CA 92260; JOHN OUTCAULT, 74-133 El Paseo #11, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of landscaping plans for an industrial administrative building. LOCATION: West side of Cook Street, approx. 650 feet north of 42nd. ZONE: S.I. S.P. The following condition to apply: 1. Parking at Cook Street must be screened by means of wall, shrubs or berming at a minimum of 42" in height. AGENDA ITEM NO. III-A-1 DATE: May 28, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES (Continental Inn), 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 92121; G.E. HOLGUIN do ASSOC., P.O. Box 13152, Tucson, AZ 85732. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of landscaping plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway Ill, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. DISCUSSION: Final approval of the working drawings was granted on March 26, 1985. The landscaping plans were not approved because it was determined that the final plans were not adequate. The applicant has submitted a revised set of final landscaping plans which appear to be much more detailed than the previous plans. Additionally, new materials not shown on previous plans are indicated. The landscaping plans also show landscaping of the Frontage Road median. The theme and materials are not compatible with the Leeds (Vacation Inn) median plan already approved. The plans should be compatible and carry a uniform theme. RECOMM ENDATION: Review the plans and determine acceptability. the Vacation Inn should be resolved. Prepared by 15,6 /dlg The median landscaping conflict with March 29, 1985 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES (Continental Incc), 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 92121; G.E. HOLGUIN & ASSOC., P.O. Box 13152, Tucson, AZ 85732; C. HAVER & ASSOC., 74-390 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA . NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway III, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the architectural review commmission rapproved this case. Date of Action: March 26, 1985 Vote: Carried 4-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION MARCH 26, 1985 IIL CASES: A. Final Drawings: I. CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES (Continental Inn), 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 92121; G.E. HOLGUIN & ASSOC. P.O. Box 13152, Tucson, AZ 85732; C. HAVER & ASSOC., 74-390 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Commissioner Gregory indicated that the landscape plan was not adequate as a final plan for the reason that it did not show sizes and detail of materials to be used. It was discussed by the commission that it could approve the final plans with the landscape plan to be approved at a later date. Moved by Commissioner Leung, seconded by Commissioner Martin to approve the working drawings subject to the conditions stated on the staff report and the following: I. That the landscape plan be resubmitted to the Architectural Review Commission prior to building permit issuance. Carried 4-0 2. CASE NO: 977 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ORTHO MATTRESS INC., 2035 E. Vista Bella Way, Rancho Dominquez, CA 90220 Attn: A. Andrade; WESTERN SIGN & GRAPHICS, 1618 N. Missle Way, Anaheim, CA 92801, Attn: L. Bursten. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of business sign for Ortho Mattress Store. LOCATION: 73-394 Highway III ZONE: C-1 S.P. Commissioner Martin noted that the signs seemed too large for the building and the color was a little bright. Commissioner Cook suggested that the applicant use the existing sign that was to be used at the rear of the building and place it on the front of the building on one of the side stucco areas. It's too large to fit on the center area above the door. Commissioner Cook was also opposed to the proposed color. Commissioner Gregory indicated using a lighter yellow might make the color acceptable. The commission suggested using #2114 blue and #2325 yellow. The applicant noted that he could reduce the size of the letters of the sign if need be. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Leung to continue this case until a resubmittal is received. Carried 4-0 AGENDA ITEM NO. III-A-1 DATE: March 26, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES (Continental Inn), 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 92121; G.E. HOLGUIN & ASSOC., P.O. Box 13152, Tucson, AZ 85732; C. HAVER & ASSOC., 74-390 Highway III, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. DISCUSSION: This item was granted preliminary architectural approval at the meeting of February 12, 1985, subject to conditions. Those conditions are attached to this report. Staff has reviewed the plans and finds them generally acceptable. However, there is some need for some revision and clarification. The precise plan required the existing wall along the south property line to be raised to seven feet in height. While the plans note this, they do not note the time of providing it. Since it is required to minimize impact, it should be provided before any work commences. The exterior lighting plan has been submitted but adequate information has not yet been provided. The computer lighting level plan has not been submitted to staff who approves the plan. Additionally, the tennis court is shown with lighting. The precise plan approval specifically prohibited tennis court lighting. The landscaping plan shows a number of Washingtonia Robusta Palms. However, their heights are not indicated. During the preliminary review, it was discussed that the palms in front of the hotel should be the height shown in the elevation, which is 20 to 35 feet. Therefore, the commission should determine their heights at this time. Additionally, the applicant has provided the four foot high screen wall in front with berming, as required. However, the only landscaping in front is lawn. Some of the trees behind the wall should be brought out in front with some shrub massings. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the final drawings be approved provided the following modifications are made: 1. Raising of wall height along south property line shall be done prior to any other work being done. 2. Exterior lighting plan shall be approved by staff prior to issuance of building permit. Tennis court lighting to be removed. 3. Washingtonia Robusta tree heights to be as determined by architectural commission. 4. Along front of site, every other tree shall be placed on alternate side of the wall, with shrub masses placed on the street side of the wall. Prepared By 'c /dig 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 February 20, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES, 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 92121; G.E. HOLGUIN & ASSOC. P.O. Box 13152, Tucson, AZ 85732; C. HAVER & ASSOC. 74-390 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway III, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Upon reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by staff and be the applicant, the architectural review commission munute motioned this case. Date of Action: February 12, 1985 Vote: Carried 3-0 (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the city clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY - FEBRUARY 12, 1985 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. after a one hour study session. Members Present: Al Cook Ron Gregory Rick Holden Members Absent: Bernie Leung Staff Present: Ray Diaz Steve Smith Stan Sawa Donna Gomez Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve the minutes of the meeting of January 22, 1985, as written. Carried 3-0. I1. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Gregory to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 2-0-1 (Commissioner Cook abstaining). 1. CASE NO: 952 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IMPERIAL SIGN CO., 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201 for Jerry Chazen - El Paseo Palms. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of sign program at El Paseo Palms Palms to Pines West Phase II). LOCATION: El Paseo and Highway III - west of TGI Fridays. ZONE: PC (3) S.P. Subject to the following condition: 1. Each tenant must occupy at least 2 units. 2. CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES, 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 92121; G.E. GOLGUIN & ASSOC. P.O. Box 13152, Tucson, AZ 85732; C. HAVER & ASSOC. 74-390 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway III, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions mentioned on the staff report apply. 2. Roof tile to be clay instead of concrete. 3. End isles in parking lot to be landscaped. 4. Mirrored windows in arch ways to be changed to solar bronze glass. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY - FEBRUARY 12, 1985 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE I. The meeting w called to order at 2:00 p.m. after a one hour stud✓session. Members Present: AI Cook on Gregory 'ck Holden Members Absent: Berr%e Leung Staff Present: Ray ❑ Steve Stan S Donna Moved by Commissioner Holden, sl�condeoy Commissioner Cook to approve the minutes of the meeting of January``�Q,2, J,,985, as written. Carried 3-0. IL Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Gregory to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 2-0-1 (Commissioner Cook abstaining). 1. CASE NO: 952 SA APPLICANT (AND ADpfiESS): IMPER Indio, CA 92201 for Jerry Chazen - EI NATURE OF PR(�r7ECT/APPROVAL El Paseo Palms alms to Pines Wes SIGN CO., 46-120 Calhoun Street, to Palms. Approval of sign program at LOCATION:/El Paseo and Highway III - west of'TGI Friday's. ZONE: 9C (3) S.P. to the following condition: tenant must occupy at least 2 units. 2. CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES, 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 92121; G.E. GOLGUIN & ASSOC. P.O. Box 13152, Tucson, AZ 85732; C. HAVER & ASSOC. 74-390 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway III, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions mentioned on the staff report apply. 2. Roof tile to be clay instead of concrete. 3. End isles in parking lot to be landscaped. 4. Mirrored windows in arch ways to be changed to solar bronze glass. -I- AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-1 DATE: February 12, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS). HOTEL PROPERTIES, 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 92121; G.E. HOLGUIN & ASSOC., P.O. Box 13152 Tucson, AZ 85732; C. HAVER & ASSOC., 74-390 Highway 111, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Rd. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. DISCUSSION: This project was approved by the Planning Commission on November 20, 1984. The site is located immediately east of the Desert Sun newspaper building, across from the Granada Royale. The site, which is irregular in shape, would have access to a frontage road extended from the west. Additionally, an signalized access to Highway III will be provided. SITE DESIGN: The structure will be located on the westerly portion of the property, along with the out- door recreational area. The majority of the parking is located on the easterly portion of the site. ARCHITECTURE: The building would be of a contempary spanish style with exterior materials consisting of a tan stucco, red tile roof and brown metal railings. The structure would be 3 stories in height with a maximum 35 foot height as permitted by code. Some unique features of the building are the 3 story high inside atrium with a water element that runs inside to outside, and 3 story high vertical glazing (solar reflective) placed in various areas. Air conditioners for the rooms would be individual and placed adjacent to the balconies or patios for each room. They would be partially screened by the balcony railings. LANDSCAPING/RECREATION: The site is provided with an extensive amount of landscaping and recreational area. Recreational facilities would consist of an unlit, sunken tennis court, outdoor ramadas, a swimming pool and jacuzzi, an outdoor water element and various walking paths and seating areas. As required by the planning commission approval, a minimum 10 foot wide landscaped strip would be provided along the south property line. Within the parking lot is a double row of parking with a landscape strip between. The landscape only shows groundcover. Trees placed between stalls (for protection of trees) in the planter should be provided for shade and to break up the exspanse of asphalt. Additionally, the Planning Commission approval required sloped landscaping up to a four foot high wall to screen the diagonal parking spaces along the street frontage. The plans do not reflect this, however, it can be provided easily. SIGNS: The applicants are not asking for sign approval at this time. However, their plans indicate a sign location. Staff would like to inform the applicant that the sign ordinance prohibits the top of the sign to exceed 20 feet from the ground. RECOMMENDATION: The commission should review the plans and determine acceptability. Should you approve, the following conditions should be imposed: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. Existing wall along south property line shall be raised to seven feet with wall extension to match existing wall per Planning Commission requirements. 4. Four foot high masonry wall with landscaping bermed up to it shall be provided to screen diagonal parking spaces area from view of Highway 111. Prepared by S eD -5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1008 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN FOR A 129 ROOM HOTEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111, APPROXIMATELY 285 EAST OF SHADOW HILLS ROAD. CASE NO. PP 84-40 WIIEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of October, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued public hearings on October 16, and November 20, 1984, to consider the request of HOTEL PROPERTIES (Continental Inn Hotel) for approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of a 129 room hotel on 2.97 acres in the PC (4) S.P. zone located on the south side of Highway III, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road, more particularly described as: Portion of Lot 1, Tract 11883 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project would not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan PP 84-40 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 20th day of November, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: ERWOOD ABSTAIN: NONE /BUFORD CRITES, Chairman ATTEST: A RAMON A. DIAZ, Secre /tin -1- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1008 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PP 84-40 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits (Case No. PP 84-40) on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all municipal code requirements to the degree that the city could consider each phase as a single project. .3. Construction of said project shall commence within twelve months from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted by the planning commission; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances" and state and federal statutes in force, or which hereafter may be In force. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission Riverside County Department of Health City Fire Marshal Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground, if practicable, as a part of the development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 7. Adjacent to south property line, a ten foot wide heavily landscaped area shall be provided; planting to include vertical trees for screening. 8. Existing wall along south property line shall be raised to seven feet provided property owner of wall agrees; wall extension to match existing wall. 9. Parking lot lighting system shall be designed to comply with municipal code requirements with light standards to be maximum 20 feet high. Lights to be down - shining box type light and provided with the shields facing residential properties. Plans, specifications, computer lighting print-out to be approved by city during architectural review process. 10. Reciprocal access agreements to be recorded prior to issuance of building permits between subject property and parcels to east contained in Parcel Map 20217. 11. Tennis court shall be unlit and sunk four feet below grade to the satisfaction of the city. 12. Four foot high masonry wall with landscaping bermed up to it shall be provided to screen parking spaces from view of Highway 111. 13. Entire site to be provided with walls as required by city. 14. Should any future access drives between parcels be required by the city, this applicant shall install any that are required on his property. -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1008 Department of Public Works: 15. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 16. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 17. Landscaping maintenance on Frontage Road shall be provided by the property owner. 18. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to Issuance of any permits. 19. Only two driveway approaches will be allowed to serve this property. Size and location to public works specifications. 20. A traffic signal at the entrance to Highway III shall be installed. Until signal is energized, there shall be no access to Highway I I I allowed. City Fire Marshal: 21. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000/5000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 3 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 22. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 23. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 24. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-40 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 25. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 26. All interior driveway turns must have a 40 foot turning radius. 27. Fire lanes will be required. 28. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. -3- I. II. MINUTES PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION TUESDAY - FEBRUARY 12, 1985 2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. after a one hour study session. Members Present: Al Cook Ron Gregory Rick Holden Members Absent: Bernie Leung Staff Present: Ray Diaz Steve Smith Stan Sawa Donna Gomez Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Cook to approve the minutes of the meeting of January 22, 1985, as written. Carried 3-0. Moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Gregory to approve the following cases by minute motion. Carried 2-0-1 (Commissioner Cook abstaining). 1. CASE NO: 952 SA APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IMPERIAL SIGN CO., 46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201 for Jerry Chazen - El Paseo Palms. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of sign program at El Paseo Palms Palms to Pines West Phase II . LOCATION: El Paseo and Highway III - west of TGI Friday's. ZONE: PC (3) S.P. Subject to the following condition: 1. Each tenant must occupy at least 2 units. 2. CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES, 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 921,21; G.E. GOLGUIN & ASSOC. P.O. Box 13152, Tucson, AZ 85732; C. HAVER do ASSOC. 74-390 Highway III, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway III, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. Subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions mentioned on the staff report apply. 2. Roof tile to be clay instead of concrete. 3. End isles in parking lot to be landscaped. 4. Mirrored windows in arch ways to be changed to solar bronze glass. -1- AGENDA ITEM NO: III-B-I DATE: February 12, 1985 ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION CASE NO: 249 C APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): HOTEL PROPERTIES, 4350 Executive Drive, San Diego, CA 92121; G.E. HOLGUIN & ASSOC., P.O. Box 13152 Tucson, AZ 85732; C. HAVER & ASSOC., 74-390 Highway Ill, Palm Desert, CA 92260. NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for a 129 room hotel on 2.96 acres. LOCATION: South side of Highway 111, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Rd. ZONE: PC (4) S.P. DISCUSSION: This project was approved by the Planning Commission on November 20, 1984. The site is located immediately east of the Desert Sun newspaper building, across from the Granada Royale. The site, which is irregular in shape, would have access to a frontage road extended from the west. Additionally, an signalized access to Highway Ill will be provided. SITE DESIGN: The structure will be located on the westerly portion of the property, along with the out- door recreational area. The majority of the parking is located on the easterly portion of the site. ARCHITECTURE: The building would be of a contempary spanish style with exterior materials consisting of a tan stucco, red tile roof and brown metal railings. The structure would be 3 stories in height with a maximum 35 foot height as permitted by code. Some unique features of the building are the 3 story high inside atrium with a water element that runs inside to outside, and 3 story high vertical glazing (solar reflective) placed in various areas. Air conditioners for the rooms would be individual and placed adjacent to the balconies or patios for each room. They would be partially screened by the balcony railings. LANDSCAPING/RECREATION: The site is provided with an extensive amount of landscaping and recreational area. Recreational facilities would consist of an unlit, sunken tennis court, outdoor ramadas, a swimming pool and jacuzzi, an outdoor water element and various walking paths and seating areas. As required by the planning commission approval, a minimum 10 foot wide landscaped strip would be provided along the south property line. Within the parking lot is a double row of parking with a landscape strip between. The landscape only shows groundcover. Trees placed between stalls (for protection of trees) in the planter should be provided for shade and to break up the exspanse of asphalt. Additionally, the Planning Commission approval required sloped landscaping up to a four foot high wall to screen the diagonal parking spaces along the street frontage. The plans do not reflect this, however, it can be provided easily. SIGNS: The applicants are not asking for sign approval at this time. However, their plans indicate a sign location. Staff would like to inform the applicant that the sign ordinance prohibits the top of the sign to exceed 20 feet from the ground. RECOMMENDATION: The commission should review the plans and determine acceptability. Should you approve, the following conditions should be imposed: 1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be issued until completed. 2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading, lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department of environmental services to this project until the aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been completed. 3. Existing wall along south property line shall be raised to seven feet with wall extension to match existing wall per Planning Commission requirements. 4. Four foot high masonry wall with landscaping bermed up to it shall be provided to screen diagonal parking spaces area from view of Highway 111. Prepared by J e7 -S 9 N' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1008 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PRECISE PLAN OF DESIGN FOR A 129 ROOM HOTEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111, APPROXIMATELY 285 EAST OF SHADOW HILLS ROAD. CASE NO. PP 84-40 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 2nd day of October, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing and continued public hearings on October 16, and November 20, 1984, to consider the request of HOTEL PROPERTIES (Continental Inn Hotel) for approval of a precise plan of design to allow construction of a 129 room hotel on 2.97 acres in the PC (4) S.P. zone located on the south side of Highway 111, approximately 285 feet east of Shadow Hills Road, more particularly described as: Portion of Lot 1, Tract 11883 WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of the "City of Palm Desert Procedures to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act, Resolution No. 80-89", in that the director of environmental services has determined that the project would not have an adverse impact on the environment and a negative declaration has been prepared. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to justify the granting of said precise plan of design: 1. The design of the precise plan will not substantially depreciate property values in the vicinity. 2. The precise plan will not unreasonably interfere with the use or enjoyment of property in the vicinity by the occupants thereof for lawful purposes. 3. The precise plan will not endanger the public peace, health, safety or general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the commission in this case. 2. That approval of Precise Plan PP 84-40 is hereby granted for reasons subject to the attached conditions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Palm Desert Planning Commission, held on this 20th day of November, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: DOWNS, RICHARDS, WOOD, AND CRITES NOES: NONE ABSENT: ERWOOD ABSTAIN: NONE ATTEST: 6 r / // 41 RAMON A. DIAZ, Secre 'BUFORD CRITES, Chairman Am -1- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1008 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PP 84-40 Department of Environmental Services: 1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with exhibits (Case No. PP 84-40) on file with the department of environmental services, as modified by the following conditions. 2. Construction of the total development may be done in phases; however, each individual phase shall meet or exceed all municipal code requirements to the degree that the city could consider each phase as a single project. .3. Construction of said project shall commence within twelve months from the date of final approval unless an extension of time is granted by the planning commission; otherwise said approval shall become null, void and of no effect whatsoever. 4. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein which are in addition to all municipal ordinances'and state and federal statutes in force, or which hereafter may be in force. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies: Coachella Valley Water District Palm Desert Architectural Commission Riverside County Department of Health City Fire Marshal Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building and Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith. 6. All existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to the property being developed shall be installed underground, if practicable, as a part of the development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed. 7. Adjacent to south property line, a ten foot wide heavily landscaped area shall be provided; planting to include vertical trees for screening. 8. Existing wall along south property line shall be raised to seven feet provided property owner of wall agrees; wall extension to match existing wall. 9. Parking lot lighting system shall be designed to comply with municipal code requirements with light standards to be maximum 20 feet high. Lights to be down - shining box type light and provided with the shields facing residential properties. Plans, specifications, computer lighting print-out to be approved by city during architectural review process. 10. Reciprocal access agreements to be recorded prior to issuance of building permits between subject property and parcels to east contained in Parcel Map 20217. 11. Tennis court shall be unlit and sunk four feet below grade to the satisfaction of the city. 12. Four foot high masonry wall with landscaping bermed up to it shall be provided to screen parking spaces from view of Highway i 11. 13. Entire site to be provided with walls as required by city. 14. Should any future access drives between parcels be required by the city, this applicant shall install any that are required on his property. -2- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1008 Department of Public Works: 15. Drainage facilities shall be provided, per Ordinance No. 218 and the Master Drainage Plan, to the specifications of the Director of Public Works. 16. Additional storm drain construction shall be contingent upon a drainage study by the private engineer. 17. Landscaping maintenance on Frontage Road shall be provided by the property owner. 18. Complete grading plans and specifications shall be submitted, as required by ordinance, to the city engineer for checking and approval prior to Issuance of any permits. 19. Only two driveway approaches will be allowed to serve this property. Size and location to public works specifications. 20. A traffic signal at the entrance to Highway III shall be installed. Until signal is energized, there shall be no access to Highway I I I allowed. City Fire Marshal: 21. Install a water system capable of delivering 3000/5000 GPM fire flow from any fire hydrant for a 3 hour duration in addition to domestic supply. The computation shall be based upon a minimum of 20 psi residual operating pressure in the supply main from which the flow is measured at the time of measurement. Fire flow requirements will depend on built-in fire protection provisions of buildings. 22. Install Riverside County super fire hydrants so that no point of any building is more than 200 feet from a fire hydrant measured along approved vehicular travel ways. a. exterior surface of hydrant barrels and heads shall be painted chrome yellow, and the tops and nozzle caps shall be painted green. b. curbs shall be painted red 15 feet in either direction from each hydrant. C. hydrants shall not be located closer than 25 feet to any building. 23. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall furnish the original and three copies of the water system plan to the Fire Marshal for review. Upon approval, one copy will be sent to the building department and the original will be returned to the developer. 24. The water system plan shall be signed by a registered civil engineer and approved by the water company, with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in PP 84-40 is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Fire Marshal." 25. Prior to delivery of combustible materials to the building site, the required water system shall be installed, operating and delivering the required flow. 26. All interior driveway turns must have a 40 foot turning radius. 27. Fire lanes will be required. 28. Additional fire protection requirements may be necessary when applicant submits specific plans for consideration and approval. -3- MATERIAL & COLOR SCHEDULE WALLS WALKS ROOF PAINT ON METAL MAT/ L PLASTER PAINT ON TILE STOREFRONTE GLACING HANDRAILS TILE CONC. TILE PLASTER AND TRIM COLORNAVAJO BROWN DARK SOLAR MIXED TO MATCH BROOM TERRA WHITE R-8806 BRONZE BRONZE MATCH WALL TILE TAN COTTA #80 STOREFRONT FINISH COLOR 1, POWERWALL DUNN DAL -TILE AMARf.ITE SUPPLIED DUNN BOMANITE MONIER PROD. 3/8" THICK EDWARDS CORONA OR OR EQUAL BY STORE- EDWARDS 8" X 8" VILLA OR GLASS REIN OR EQUAL EQUAL FRONT OR EQUAL SCORED EQUAL STUCCO OR MANUF CONCRETE EQUAL OR EQUAL CONTINENTAL INN - PALM DESERT MATERIAL & COLOR SCHEDULE WALLS WALKS ROOF PAINT ON METAL M A T' L PLASTER PAINT ON TILE STOREFRONTE GLACING HANDRAILS AND TRIM TILE CONC. TILE PLASTER COLOR NAVAJO BROWN DARK SOLAR MIXED TO MATCH BROOM TERRA WHITE R-8806 BRONZE BRONZE MATCH WALL TILE TAN COTTA #80 STOREFRONT FINISH COLOR POWERWALL DUNN DAL -TILE AMARLITE SUPPLIED DUNN BOMANITE ---- MONIER PROD 3/8" THICK EDWARDS CORONA OR OR EQUAL BY STORE- EDWARDS 8" X 8" VILLA OR . GLASS REIN OR EQUAL EQUAL FRONT OR EQUAL SCORED EQUAL STUCCO OR MANUF. CONCRETE EQUAL OR EQUAL CONTINENTAL INN -PALM DESERT e9WHotel Properties 4350 Executive Dr. San Diego, CA. 92121 G. E. Holguin & Assoc. P. 0. Box 13152 Tucson, AZ. 85732 FIN(:IING5K 74-390sHHaver ighway&111 soc. Palm Desert, CA. 92260 r nV.-Gs 1 0 Garden light for path, low planting areas, walkways, driveways, etc. All aluminum construction. White acrylic diffuser. Textured gray finish. 5326 Incandescent Three 60W, Head only Tapped for standard W pipe M' N.PTJ. 40" lead wires supplied. 5326-124 Complete with head, 24" stem and 4'h' dia. cast aluminum burial or surface outlet box. 5327 Portable slake light. Complete with head. 241stem. weatherproof 8' 6". 3-conductor cord set and 123A* cast aluminum stake. f--u'h"cim —6324 Incandescent 200W Head only Tapped for standard rh" pipe (Ye" N.PT.) 40' lead wires supplied. 1 18 Complete with head, 18" stem and 4112" dia. cast aluminum outlet box for burial or surface mounting. 5325 Portable stake light. Complete with head, 18' stem, weatherproof 8' 6. 3-conductor cord set and 12%* cast aluminum stake. PRESCOLITE 1' O51 OF pALN DES �7 FORX �c Nlftw DESIGN REVIEW BOAR �lPPUC,%'4 0M FORM: dmperfr wt of maws'dmnmentrO samle s a �pew�Eca� �Ge�GaE®u� elep^•%28_1988 REQUEST: (Oeecfbe scedHe nature a1 approval requested). PROPERTY OESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. EXISTING ZONINGr' Property Owner autnarizatton TM underragned etata 1tgt,the y are thet owner W of iM proosrtY deseHbed herein and twrehy give auto Izat)on-far IM Rling ce this apdaaatlon. m, ury or rarm uesert of art liaoullf" too" to any deed restrictions. 1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, AI%mtve ?he Oty Of Palm Oaert of all liaallltles regdrding arty data restrktioi C-Y— roar may be apptkaale 10 me property described hw*n. applicant's Signature DR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status ❑ Ministerial Act E.A. IVa. ❑ Categorical Esempnon ❑ Negative Oedarotion ❑ Other Date Aeeepfed by: (JA212 MOO � Reference Care No CITY OF PALM DESERT APPLICATION FORM DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS Design Review Of: CASE NO. Agreement of compliance to be signed by those app ying for review. `-- I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart- ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma- tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. The development -of this project -shall conform substantially to all development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services.. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed: Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy. Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all requirements of the City Engineer. All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone, cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables, which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being developed shall be installed underground as a part of development from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed as requi ed biv Municipal Code. } _C�) i gnatulre Department of Environmental Services Form Is The Design Review Board process is the method by which the City of Palm Desert reviews detailed design and construction plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. DEPARTMENT APPLICATION OF ENVIRON- MENTAL SERVICES STAFF DESIGN ^ PLANNING REVIEW r\ COMMISSION BOARD (APPROVES OR (ADVISORY) DENIES PROJECT) INTERIOR REMODELS, MINOR ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING PERMITS PROCESSING SCHEDULE: a DEPARTMENT BUILDING AND CONS"i' SAFETY ION SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES and similar projects require 2-4 working days before they may be submitted to the Building and Safety Oivfsion for plan check. MULTI -FAMILY, COMMERCIAL, and other projects that must be reviewed by the D.R.B. and Planning Commission usually require 10-20 days. In order to facilitate processing, the applicant or a designated representative should attend the review hearings to answer questions which may arise regarding the project. STAFF USE ONLY: ate Received Date of ACTOR 'Meeting ACTION APPLICANT NOTIFI Staff ORB P.C. rc _-C - Departmenof Environmental Services Form la CASE NO. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CHECKLIST INITIAL PLAN REVIEW NOTE: Planning Division Staff are required to reject applications if any applicable exhibits are not received and checked. I. Completed Application Form (one (1) copy) II. Address labels for project sponsors (two (2) copies, gummed labels & typed list) Not required for a single-family dwelling application, or staff approved signs. III. Detailed Plot Plan A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/Approval A. - Three (3) full size (one (1) of which is to be colored) - One (1) reduced copy (8j"xll", or 13") B. Staff Approval B. [� - Three (3) full size IV. Information Sheet and/or Plan Block V. Site Analysis & Preliminary Drainage and Grading Plan (Three (3) copies, may be com- bined, where appropriate, with plot plan) VI. Architectural Elevations (all sides of the building(s)) A. Design Review Board and Commission Review/ r� Approval A. L� - Three (3) full size (one (1) of which is to be color keyed) - One (1) reduced copy (8}"xll" or 13") r--t B. Staff Approval B• u - Three (3) full size DRB Checklist Page Two ** VII. Sign Program (elevation(s) and details, if applicable) - Three (3) copies to scale VIII. Color and Material Exhibits Color and Materials written description (one (1) copy) Color and Materials sample board (max. 8"xl3", 3/8" thick) IX. Floor and Roof Plans - Three (3) copies to scale * X. Landscape Plan (3 copies, 1 colored) - Plant List, (1 copy) * XI. Exterior Lighting Plan,(3 copies) XII. Filing Fee A. Commission Review/Approval ($50.00) A. B. Staff approval, single-family r� dwellings ($15.00) B• L_J C. Sign Program Only ($15.00 DRB or C. $10.00 Staff) * Items X and XI maj be combined. ** Sign Program only - submit items IIIB, VI, VII, VIII, and Sign Fee. Initial Plan Exhibits Received and Checked by: / Ping. Div. Staff Da FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS I. Three (3) copies of drawings to be submitted for plan check. Drawings must reflect all Conditions of Approval. Final Construction Drawings Received by: / Ping. Div. Staff Dat /t,kl5 NO I -l3 - E& '�� e �Li i LDI I�1 C� �= ��A�7�( L71✓Pi LoAv u\U N 17`( Su�JEGT s l!JdL IrJ��PC-L�"ic 1 CANT)N�l�lT�iL_ INN GDhAl'L 7`C ')LLg- Ltd 3. RBI- -)l'JC L-OT J � i�G�-Ft P� LIC15�4LEL cr�NT��GTo� . 2• LI67+4 WATTACV- e::� Ll&AT, �l►T Slt— e Go/\tYS l l �EZu� % a;-� 9?�r- ak-�Z) • 54 A C7�E � tJT W IT-N i3C--Pr fit= &xj ItDl A-n U. 6 . 3, PrZDV I C7tL soLl� -rAr1: oN TY LF�{ { 1✓NGl1�Su2E P�� z S► 1!STr ,LI LA,f.)pr�GAPINC� CTK-CAS -�G. Ili �Ui )� t re- -&-& ,K- 29rJT Sty . 4p • ��' N (��J%�f J V ua � 1z/c G ETOLCUIN t MUCIAM M 79�i848� Architects and Planners P.O. Box 13152 Tucson, Az 85732-3152 602 Associate Office West Palm Beach, Fla. TRANSMITTAL LETTER PROJECT: ��rl`��{�`t'�`A� 11 `f,I ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: (name, address) 1 Y ' 11 V / V me—� DATE: 0. lb . TO: r G�� 1 �Fii I� If enclosures are not as noted, please inform us immediately. If checked below, please: ATTN: v/ Acknowledge receipt of enclosures. L 1 /AI V ��i�•�tvvr—r ( ) Return enclosures to us. WE TRANSMIT: herewith ( ) under separate cover via ( )in accordance with your request THE FOLLOWING: (XDrowings ( ) Shop Drawing Prints ( ) Samples ( ) Specifications ( ) Shop Drawing Reproducibles ( ) Product Literature ( ) Change Order ( ) FOR YOUR (�) approval ( ) distribution to parties ( ) information review 8 comment ( ) record ( ) use ( ) s• s ® s DESCRIPTION t s.. y ENVIROMALNTAL SERVICES CiTY OF PALR4 DESERT ACTION A. Action indicated on Item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding as noted below under REMARKS CODE 11. No action required E. See REMARKS below C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS owk YW! BY: dodo— /� 'ur' ='M CLIENT PI4ewh PFIN 166UE MTE W�t 1oV o =IZ fA!< ZIJ >.t1 il0 ZWC.) OL) Tr T3 ,3 °oo' p�llE 6'cmu /stucco wall ® . te\/- �_4 -V IIII DkU -II.S= F, shuffle boardpool zzi 72 42 mow Pro osed 129 Room 3 Story Hotel Co4-FT- -►I — ® a u l tE 41 � I I �M II II I� II II II II I� T3 II IgQ.551 F II (I"115 slF II 1 y II 71 �\ ss�s moo 'V c Rio 44,50 _ 243I SF- I ►II -- — �I�5.Ss, SfF , X t3 = t eature l 5qtI L J -7b T o�jg0 - ..ai iiiiia ; i � T 3 S t ramadas4 y ( 2 0 s , .r. 1 i CO 7- r 0`oo'S'f" E TI Tentative entative P l a n t Pa tl e t t e T I -trees T I Frminra w,1P+iww'1IIIi'o' (Ma&wy & A&H) T-2 �-.orz;44w f loniQum (p>lue Palo Yarde,) p�oIopiV Ghtl +� (411ean Nfeumdi+e) 2 z T 4 *iinuorwiLo (�jl'paYniq pepper-) 5f3 I T 5 t'lgU0trVM jar, ljII/4 (JarYr4iWV& jq'1VC;0 0 5 r T-6 gwAl yrhk ki,.,rateca (-nny-armmed k? I^ T- 7 Vacal ypturW 1�01yan-thcvn�(�rlua- l 010- WO. TI aa0h In yim A*uyta (Me le -a" mom FbIm) o Tr T3 ,3 °oo' p�llE 6'cmu /stucco wall ® . te\/- �_4 -V IIII DkU -II.S= F, shuffle boardpool zzi 72 42 mow Pro osed 129 Room 3 Story Hotel Co4-FT- -►I — ® a u l tE 41 � I I �M II II I� II II II II I� T3 II IgQ.551 F II (I"115 slF II 1 y II 71 �\ ss�s moo 'V c Rio 44,50 _ 243I SF- I ►II -- — �I�5.Ss, SfF , X t3 = t eature l 5qtI L J -7b T o�jg0 - ..ai iiiiia ; i � T 3 S t ramadas4 y ( 2 0 s , .r. 1 i CO 7- r 0`oo'S'f" E TI Tentative entative P l a n t Pa tl e t t e T I -trees T I Frminra w,1P+iww'1IIIi'o' (Ma&wy & A&H) T-2 �-.orz;44w f loniQum (p>lue Palo Yarde,) p�oIopiV Ghtl +� (411ean Nfeumdi+e) 2 z T 4 *iinuorwiLo (�jl'paYniq pepper-) 5f3 I T 5 t'lgU0trVM jar, ljII/4 (JarYr4iWV& jq'1VC;0 0 5 r T-6 gwAl yrhk ki,.,rateca (-nny-armmed k? I^ T- 7 Vacal ypturW 1�01yan-thcvn�(�rlua- l 010- WO. TI aa0h In yim A*uyta (Me le -a" mom FbIm) o UN 05 Z m NLL �• a Z (n =W ou T O V W NQu i N C� UjQlt �000 t- 3e;?62 I # -I 23, 25 t Cot "1S I + ao•z� • -t 2A - - + lq3 S -.t- o 1 T ' (P4 8 GLUE sKY t W J f _III = 5 0 cr cc F E B 1 1985 E VIRONMENTAL SERVICES Q WIT`( OF PALM DESERT L 0 Q a J CAPE PLAN cEdtA 64,E -I MIN, M>�1F IAaf 11� A,*:,:, LT LZVY .. cF I �?Lb o E,JTOR.I JUNK su 1:20 Z. AIIIl, L ff ' C� c-tt4- . CI J I M \ STA-- �T 3,C1J PPiK 57 ZIAMIfJ.cp ii 71�j% P;✓-t'II �X �� L"A� TiM CP $J '�7rALL,'4KMoIR) . TFtS il allU �I s �- I M I ICI, eT-- s8 �I. � �1M� c� IN�TAL.L.AToN, i ) + shrubs groundcovers il mo► � ,vup I° .II,J I--�•M1�j 2 MyIIINrr��X ��l o'� M��,t�za�s✓Z, ItJ N01 DESCRIP TION OATIE 5-a eortade-eaxlaiI coymr� ��(nrareawinterire ) C@ M� cF IN ALLAT, �REVISIONS Joox)S-2 Rie Arar.Ic+� Ir:5 c:/Z IN `ttiz$ @Tl(" (�-, fF 57ALLA7, DRAWN _ _-- 5-3 C�(Yldht c(T,�a�iX.v%ni G-3 {if'IdtY!(AD�Gi �jl�L�pJGa AizGUI�b PF�f2jh-1�I -ham CHKD Q yam,, ( �r �n��, - ---- -- -_-._ 5-4 (�(iGlik� 1'�lifii'UI�OIIa (t eTdG:IUI/ J 'a G-4 l31411AY►�ii ICI (i.�/ 61Q II�IGr/ -9 1 ft:;s MINi Gr_ �, -M APPROVED s-s t��donea vlldt.1� Cho -- s-6 �rrto��vu tobu� C I'�- ';;rvrum) �-7 r i , d �tvnrl-� �, III ��r�1 SY�r i 5r�1�L � Landscape, s-7 ftioa "Wlana (pinea�ople aaudul7 cur c� IN e , s-s Junt arm (Urlr►ac,� juntpem,) Plan 5-9 Nandina pomaofica C Nandlnq) 5-to{110(�0 InoCrra (�hd�q Vlaima�ne� NO PROJEC SHEET NO 8452 DATF P•2 OF ft. J CONCEPTUAL L 0 60 120 0 40 80 0 10 2C 0 8 16 24 NNW -.. SCALE .-.T. = 60 1 , 40 1 - 10 its - 1 0 0 4 B 16 0 1 2 4- 6 0 i 2 3 S 0 1 2 0 i 2 ti4 i'-0' -- - 1/2 -.1 -0 - 3/4 =1'-0 1 1 0 11;2 1 -0 33 1 0 tF THfS SHEET IS NOT N 36 IT IS A PFOW-FD PRINT m Q A - O 1 A O SCREEN VALUE 2 — IS- Yj5 COMPOSITE INSTRUCTIONS BASE/OVERLAY NO. 'r O#OaV :. O x V m s m v v m a=i O � T 2 O Z Wa -CONTINENTAL INN G.E.WOLCUIN &* ASSOCIATES INC. PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA PHONE: ("2)� 929 - 1998 145 W. GRANT RD. SM 129 TUCSON, AZ $5746 ASSOCIATE OFFICE WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA ASSOCIATE OFFICE ALBUOUSIM", NEW MEXICO 1 a j a .L .� J�III�II�II . I(iiiiiill II 01 PM AiMMnCl 0 I 'I uii �luiiil I -- -I _ i — , rmoll �e�AII�,I�IliriL�� Ali�ii�llti , t Ate\ L-a. u :' 11l 110111 � I�l�� Liv.A 0e ■ L1 AF 9 • • A L S\° EaS PRIN ISSUE .� S60E DATE: In z O P o z IX W z J F W 1 O tlt n O W W N n m 0 60 120 0 40 60 0 10 20 mmd IC.AGE 1 " = 60 1 " = 40 1' .10 NORTH ELEVATION %P + ytPi4Y18XI:"2i �� y t r e 0 0 16 24 SOUTH ELEVATION 0 4 6 16 1/4" 0 1'— 0" i E B 5 1985 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALM DESERT cY z Z (n 5 W �a OU 2 O C/)/�W � T Q REV. DATE [NIT DRAWN: CHKD; APPROVED: PROJECT NO, e 8452. SHEET NO.: /� /� OF: DATE? 0 1 2 4 6 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3. 0 1 2 0 6" 1' 1/2" = 1 '— 0" 3/4 1'— 0" 1": 1'- 0" 1 1/2"'= V-0" r _ :. '_:j-', •;;'r`. _ _ _� _ _ y.�v, _ i r„'v i Y'w