HomeMy WebLinkAbout266C IW SIX/BOB ORR�+�+� ••� , vwuca �, H/^ �/ u Uate
P.D.B.C. - ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE
Bldg. Area S)
Architectural Review Check List Lot Area S1
Coverage I
Basic Design:
Professionally executed.
Front Elevation;
All portions to be masonry,
wood, concrete or stucco.
Entrance Doors:
Contrasting color OK.
Other Doors;
Colors to match walls.
Screening Required:
Yards, storage, roof
equipment, trash con-
tainers, loading doors.
Fence Walls: Standard Color
Visible - precision block.,
slump Ok. Chain link, wood
not permitted if visible
from street.
Parkin:
On site only. Screened
from street. Minimum 6
feet landscaping behind
curb.
Building Color:
Light desert, earth tones.
Trim - brown.
Signs:
Conform to City Code.
Wall mounted or ground OK.
Pole signs, signs painted
on walls not permitted.
Landscaping: Prelim. Drawin
Final drawings -
Complete descriptions,
irrigation plan, automatic
controller.
Street trees.
Drawinq Numbers 6 Dates
A,,r k2 slsjn
Shown
Approve Not Approved
OK
0
NO
U �,
Not Shown I Remarks
By the Architectural Committee. �2�� L] (( ,�
May 20, 1986
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION
CASE NO: 266 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IW SIX/BOB ORR, 198 Madrid, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a 6,000 square
foot industrial building.
LOCATION: South side of Mediterranean, east of Boardwalk.
ZONE: 5.1. S.P.
Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the
applicant, the architectural commission approved this case by minute motion.
Date of Action: May 13, 1986
Vote: Carried 5-0
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the
City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes.
MINUTES
PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
TUESDAY - MAY 13, 1986
2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
r • a a • w • a • • • • a • w • a • w w • w r • • a • r • • • w • • • • • • w
1. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 pm after a one hour study session.
Commission Members Current Meeting Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Ron Gregory, Chairman X 9 0
Al Cook X 7 2
Mary Drury X 7 2
Charlie Martin X 9 0
Russell McCrea X 7 2
Rick Holden, Alternate X 7 2
Staff Present: Steve Smith
Phil Drell
Phil Joy
Ken Weller
Donna Gomez
It was moved by Commissioner Drury, seconded by Commissioner Martin to
approve the minutes of April 22, 1986 as written. Carried 3-0-2
(Commissioners' Cook and McCrea abstaining).
II. Moved by Commissioner Cook. seconded by Commissioner McCrea to approve
the following cases by minute motion. Carried 5-0
1. CASE NO: 293 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): EED DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 25241 Paso de
Alicia, Suite 200, Laguna Hills, CA 92653.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of landscape plan
and roof mounted equipment detail.
LOCATION: Southwest corner Boardwalk and Mediterranean Avenue.
ZONE: S.I.
Subject to the landscape plan increasing the size of the Quercus
suberinereu.
2. CASE NO: 1181 SA
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): GENERAL ESCROW, IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY,
46-120 Calhoun Street, Indio, CA 92201.
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
MAY 13, 1986
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of internally
illuminated sign.
LOCATION: Corner of San Pablo and Alessandro.
ZONE: C-1
3. CASE NO: Misc. 86-2
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): PIETRO'S RESTAURANT, 72-221 Highway 111,
Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of signage and
relocation of existing lights.
LOCATION: Highway III
ZONE: PC (4)
4. CASE NO: 290 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): WARREN PITT ASSOC., 17951 H Skypark
Circle, Irvine, CA 92714; TERRAIN VENTURES, 4262 C Campus Drive,
Newport Beach, CA 92660; ERNEST SCHAG JR., P.O. Box 7820, Newport
Beach, CA 92660.
MATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of a six building
office/warehouse complex totaling 34,912 square feet.
LOCATION: South side of Mayfair between Beacon Hill and State
Street.
ZONE: 5.1.
5. CASE NO: 270 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BOB SANDIFER, P.O. Box 1008, Rancho
Mirage, CA 92270; BOB RICCIARDI, 45-275 Prickly Pear Lane, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of a 13,000
square foot industrial building.
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Mediterranean and Beacon Hill.
ZONE: 5.1.
2
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
MAY 13, 1986
6. CASE NO: 286 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): 1W NINE/BOB ORR, 198 Madrid Avenue, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a
6,000 square foot industrial building.
LOCATION: South side of Mediterranean.
ZONE: S.I.
7. CASE NO: 266 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): I.W. SIX/BOB ORR, 198 Madrid, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for a
6,000 square foot industrial building.
LOCATION: South side of Mediterranean, east of Boardwalk.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
8. CASE NO: 267 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IW EIGHT/BOB ORR, 198 Madrid, Palm Desert,
CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of plans for
6,000 square foot industrial building.
LOCATION: South side of Mediterranean, east of Boardwalk.
ZONE• S.I. S.P.
9. CASE NO: COC 86-3
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS). OTRA 1, OLIVE TREE APARTMENTS, 27252
Calle Arroyo, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Seeking certificate of
conformance on nonconforming complex.
LOCATION: Lots surrounded by El Camino, Sunset, Abronia and
Panorama.
3
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION
CASE NO: 266 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): IW SIX, c/o Bob Orr, 198 Madrid, Palm Desert, CA
92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for 6,000
sauare foot industrial buildinq.
LOCATION: South side of Mediterranean, east of Boardwalk.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the
applicant. the architectural commission approved this case by minute motion.
Date of Action: September 24, 1985
Vote: Carried 2-0
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the
City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes.
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 24, 1985
6. CASE NO: 266 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): iW SIX, C/O BOB ORR, 198 Madrid, Palm
Desert. CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for
6000 square foot industrial building.
LOCATION: South side of Mediterranean, east of Boardwalk.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
7. CASE NO: 289 MF
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ROYCE CONNOR, 74-935 Highway Ill, Indian
Wells, CA 92210: C.W. MAXWELL. 1109 Mesquite Avenue, Palm Springs,
CA 92264.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of a 8 unit single
story apartment project.
LOCATION: Northeast corner of Alessandro and Santa Ynez.
ZONE: R-3
Approval subject to further review and approval of landscape plan
Prior to building permit issuance.
8. CASE NO: 268 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): ED MARK, 247 La Paz Way, Palm Desert, CA
92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of two
14,000 square foot office/industrial buildings.
LOCATION: Southeast corner St James Place and Cook Street.
ZONE• S.I.
Subject to the conditions in the staff report.
3
AGENDA ITEM NO. Ili-B-2
DATE: September 24, 1985
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
CASE NO: 266 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): iW SIX, C/O BOB ORR, 198 Madrid, Palm Desert, CA
922bu.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of plans for 6000
square foot industrial building.
LOCATION: South side of Mediterranean, east of Boardwalk.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
BACKGROUND:
This project was reviewed and approved by the planning commission at the
meeting of September 17, 1985. The one story industrial building would
contain 6000 square feet of floor space and be located adjacent to the south-
west corner of the site. An existing planter runs along the rear of the site.
SITE DESIGN:
The project will share a driveway access (12 feet on each side) with the lot
to the east. The majority of the parking is located in the front of the
building with some parking and the trash at the rear.
ARCHITECTURE:
The 24 foot high building is conventional in style with tilt -up concrete panel
walls and a recessed store front entrance. The side and rear walls are plain
concrete panels. The entrance area will utilize some variation in colors
ranging from medium to dark brown. The panel walls will be tan in color.
Because of the visibi 1 ity of the back of the building to the south (lot is
raised above lots to south), staff feels there should be some type of treatment
to break up the expanse of tan wall.
LANDSCAPING:
A preliminary landscaping plan has been submitted showing species, sizes and
location. The applicant wishes to provide berming to screen the parking area.
This is acceptable provided the 42 inch continuous berming is provided and
adequate landscaping is provided. It would seem that additional planting
should be provided in the bermed area with tree sizes increased.
CASE NO. 266 C Continued
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the commission review the plans and consider staff's
comments regarding architecture and landscaping. If deemed acceptable, staff
recommends that approval be subject to the following conditions:
Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the city fire
marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall be
made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall be
issued until completed.
2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading,
lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irrigation plans and
sign program shall be submitted to the architectural review commission.
No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given by the department
of community development to this project until the aforementioned approved
plans and construction shall have been completed.
3. That if as a result of providing a sidewalk the berming and planting is
not effective, a wall shall be installed.
/dlg
J
1i "IS.UUia ll'l«, A VM'UR'W . QflvjiSJl `"7:uQ ao eu= a PugmnuWq 7 u .uf1 a
Applicant (posse print) e h
nq .address
a
lots
REOUEST! (Desvtbe spedfic nature of opprwal requested ).
3
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
Cot9- (07"(11
Telephone
EXISTING ZONING
Properly Caner Authonzaflon The undereignod states that they are the owner Is) of the properly described herein and hereby give cutht
lzatlon/far the filing of this application.
ngreemenf aasolvinq the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities relative to any deed rssiricflons.
I DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT, Absolve the City of Palm Desert of all liabilities regarding any deed restrfctlon
-�il%l Tray be applicable to the property described herein. c
Signature Date -
Aopliccnf's Signature
Signature Cate
�R STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status
❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No.
❑ Colegoricol Exemption
❑ Negalive Decfarcljon
❑ Olh.r
Acuptsd by,
Rsfenncs Cos. No.
Design Review Of:
CITY OF PALM DESERT
APPLICATION FORM
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS
Type of Project
CASE NO.
Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with
all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart-
ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or
allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma-
tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services.
The development of this project shall conform substantially to all
development plans submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised
according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change
requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any
substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board.
All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State,
City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied
with as part of the development process.
This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this
project, commencing within one year from approval date and being
promptly completed.
Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to
final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy.
Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along
the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to
final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City
Engineer., Construction shall conform to City Standards and all
requirements of the City Engineer.
All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone,
cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables,
which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being
developed shall be installed underground as a part of development
from the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed
as re d by Municipal Code.
Signature Date
Department of Environmental Services Form la
`dINHOJIIVO `i83S30 Wldd
10l S L 6`S L# lObal
■w
IVA 831N30 SS3Nisne 183S30 WIdd
or
.1O3rodd
N
F
_l
W
Lu
LU
aQ
u
a
a�
m
m a
m
❑
_
NI`
❑
'
N
u
Q�
LL
❑
E
>1
>1
C
v
7
1)
!j
w
w
a!
U
U
3
w
En
x
O
A
E
ti
U
4
to A
C
N
()
3 in
a)
a
c
c
.1
ro
v.H
w
ro
a
vw
a)
(a
ro
U
a)
N
ro
a
P+
a4
w
C
U W
41
4J
a)
71
:
ro
O
c ro
O
y
4
Y
4.1
y
w
O
3
a
U rn
ro
ro
w
Y
ro
a
A
D
U)
O
ro
u
ro
c rn
ro o)
v
3
°'.H
U
o+
a.
w
w
.°' ro
a
c
a
w
wro
a)ro
ro
.C;
ro
a)
.0 N
41 ro
U
U)
D
u
m
a)
a) to
c a)
a) O
z
w
H
m
ro
w ro
o w
u
a
ro
x
a
ro a
w e
u
u c
i o
u
�-
c
co
roro
c
cro
- a
cro
to
u
la ,
w,
O
O-W
N x
o c
.]
o
<
to w
E w
U
U w
w
N
01
0
L� q� °
d-
n:
7
I
er
I f
I �+
I�
! 1 rE
I
t T ] �!
- -- -= - - 3 - - -- -- - - -- _ -
n !�-x
E'SL`f I —cL m
.� � � j1�=-10{j ? III I�� •-�-11�_ Qv ----'�
S�
�m
�I
CL
VINa0d11VO '183S30 NlVd
t 101 5 l 6'S l# IOVHI
}
w
W
W
3
Y
F
J
2
w m
a
Q
u—
W�
a
0
a-
0
m
�
W
= •
m
LL
a
0 O u N W U 4J � Z
N W p O Fi C W 44)
1
4J u A A N O p. _'nA
l
a r a o 4 °v „ 1-1iil 'Co
Z
w 04 H aJ o w u +' ri lu
w Q
W N m o m 4 p, o �, °' m 0 �1 O
+J 4J C 14 W O: O C W N W a 7
W ..i 4 O N W O O O W y ri u J O lY-
U ,i O W m +J w O Or.
IA ww1,
O C tp J a U JJ � LW (UC
WU U 0 N •.a Y .ro 4 W W U C V— �J
41 0WE ..Ui O.W W 'UW ❑O
4J q JJ U> 7 to J: W U m J•J W U
W
rn a 13 4 a '-I aJ w C W W
RI W to W W w 'A 1J CO -4 W N .0 u J~ J7
U W U ., to U E C W ■ W O w u U N U
W Q• W C H W 7 •r4 > 00 w rf JJ W G N aJ
Wa1 Nw WWm Nw I`aJU w OU F6
.-1 N t4 4 tf1 b h m �-
PFA
a
t'� � HN amawH; ery Ha0 -M02b HE a
3c
v) p: W W q Z 04
pzCa ao Hy Hx W
aa. pq ~uzr q ONW. vaxMva ix a
OWq WEOZ 0 rn WH04 ZV to H� 0 M ,t�r7�
Fa.I
WO
O �j rl W pW; b •-i W • on
aa� wp�� W �W�� W w oc 1pa 0 O H H^� W UCL N2q O W .] m �y r� 20 DQ �N
D 3 PG UH WE�gm w •� �aWo•0-I�af.E7z F a�i 43 eWp� En'z p�.N,N.�HW E-4z a. zW m. 3 . M0 pia o 0
FH ■ ZU rkaGw �' pH vqW 1 N000 Wpa 6] W O ��qvl •pp7 3 O��aG77 ►7 P4 V �nE G6wH
HaGfa \ UO Z E Ow'�WO QH DW 1p Ip�N Ow z D W U Z w0 N44 wW b m
E H w O(s alpWy � E U. Z �+r� y Q gq v Sap? (H� (9Cl o up .�Hy pq� �yu w w W .i d
W qq P'i W W v Oil O (� Ww . W t0-� 1 �� W �J [H[�� O E H W Z Wp O V P'i �(j a' m O � U W � a'
E E . wa H Ha; pm2 m "DI z 0U� W EO•VW N WaW uC4 > T+ Z (Un d,F off M094 �,a o
`uuwa � Ew t°'-�ppql■ 9H R w pwNP4E-4 ewp4p,,■ a. �4'�+ '' w ozato 04Q m p7W`A w w 'a �a M a)rah �Q w`�a7) 0 W �Wqy a
NN �F1vHZ 040 OPrW�ppZOww0D0 \g YCHO x \WO �Wa[•I 1 d� U D �z �W H
V�/1W 21
Y1%3r•im0u ws v Od0iY1OOOozWu .-Ip4 N9V .v rXU WIliM Ix a77 4 W W W 0 NW Wm .-1 Nw W
• • • . • • O r aD O1 O rl N (4 4
H N 1•f to tO r m M 1-4 r1 ri H rl r1 r1 rl ri .-1 N N N N N
i
IIa� No-4rl
io-IO
FA
3
v
10-1c)+
ho— IL
IC?—IL8
0
i7�
Ili
�II�I
dINHO31l`dO 'i83S3a I/Vldd
L 101 S L 6'E L# iOVHi
■ : d31N30 SS3Nisns id3S3a Wldd
1 m
:103rodd
N
�i
w
w
w
m
2
3
w
W 1
w)
-j
°
2
w
w
u
G 1tib
°
u-
m
my
= m
°J
_
En°
N
�•
A\
w
°
c
Ll o v�
Leo fl r
kL
3�
of
V
Z
Nj
r
CL
n`
j
CL