HomeMy WebLinkAbout279C TRIAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY C/O STROTHER CONSTRUCTIONFebruary 5, 1986
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION
CASE NO: 279 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TRIAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, c/o Strother Construction
Company, Inc., 74-990 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of architectural plans for
an industrial/office complex.
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the
applicant, the architectural commission approved this case by minute motion.
Date of Action: January 28, 1986
Vote: Carried 5-0
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the
City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes.
MINUTES
PALM DESERT ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
TUESDAY - JANUARY 28, 1986
2:00 P.M. COMMUNITY SERVICES CONFERENCE ROOM
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
I. The meeting was called to order at 2:00 pm after a one hour study session.
Commission Members Current Meetinq Year to Date
Present Absent Present Absent
Ron Greaory, Chairman X 2 0
Al Cook X 2 0
Mary Drury X 2 0
Charlie Martin X 2 0
Russell McCrea X 2 0
Rick Holden, Alternate X 2 0
Staff Present: Ray Diaz
Steve Smith
Stan Sawa
Phil Joy
Phil Drell
Ken Weller
Donna Gomez
It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin to
approve the minutes of January 14, 1986 as amended on page 8 regarding
the amended motion for appeal at 72-890 Amber Court.
I[. Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commission Drury to approve the
following cases by minute motion. Carried 5-0 (Chairman Gregory
abstaining on Case No. 292 C)
1. CASE NO: 878 SA (Amendment)
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): RUSTY PELICAN, 2862 McGan Avenue, Irvine,
CA 92714; JOHN HOWENSTINE INC, 3188 J Airway Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA
92626.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Amendment to approved sign.
LOCATION: Northwest corner of Highway III and Painters Path.
ZONE: PC (4)
2. CASE NO: 292 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SACRED HEART CHURCH FOR ROMAN CATHOLIC
BISHOP OF SAN BERNARDINO, 43775 Deep Canyon Drive, Palm Desert, CA
92260; CHARLES BROWN, ARCH, 647 N. Main Street, Riverside, CA 92501.
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
JANUARY 28, 1986
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary and final approval of
plans for addition to church.
LOCATION: Northwest corner of Fred Waring Drive and Deep Canyon
Drive.
ZONE: R-1 9,000
3. CASE NO: 279 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TRIAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, c/o Strother
Construction Company, Inc., 74-990 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of architectural
plans for an industrial/office complex.
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
Subject to a final landscape plan approval prior to building permit
Issuance.
4. CASE NO: 792 SA (Amendment)
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BAKERS SQUARE RESTAURANT, 73-025 Highway
111, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of changes to existing
freestanding sign.
LOCATION: South side of Highway III east of Highway 74.
ZONE: C-1 S.P.
5. CASE NO: 1100 SA
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): SHELL OIL, 73-021 Highway Ill, Palm
Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of illuminated gas
price signs to replace existing non -illuminated ones.
LOCATION: Northeast corner
ZONE: C-1 S.P.
2
AGENDA ITEM NO. 111-A-5
DATE: January 28, 1986
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
CASE NO: 279 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TRIAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, c/o Strother Construction
Company, Inc., 74-990 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Final approval of architectural plans for
an industrial/office complex.
LOCATION: Southwest corner of Cook Street and Hovley Lane.
ZONE: S.I., S.P.
BACKGROUND:
October 22, 1985, commission granted preliminary approval subject to the usual
conditions. November 12, 1985, applicant requested and obtained approval of
an extra change from brick to painted concrete.
One concern expressed by commission at these meetings included screening of
roof mounted equipment.
DISCUSSION:
The plans as submitted are substantially the same as those given preliminary
approval.
As of the writing of this report staff did not have a final landscape plan
although we understand one will be available for review at the meeting.
Staff also advised the applicant of commission's concern relative to the
visibility of roof mounted equipment and a section drawing from the Cook-Hovley
intersection is being prepared.
RECOMMENDATION:
If the roof mounted equipment is adequately screened and the landscape plan is
adequate, staff would recommend final approval be granted.
l
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
OCTOBER 22, 1985
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of
architectural plans for an industrial/office complex.
LOCATION: Southwest corner Cook Street and Hovley Lane.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
Mr. Smith indicated that staff was concerned with the extensive use
of black class in this environment.
Commissioner Martin indicated concern with the roof mounted
mechanical equipment' being visible and suggested that the glass be
extendedto screen the equipment. He also questioned the type of
glass material being used.
Daniela Bogdan, applicant, stated that she could send a sample of
the material for the commission's review.
Commissioner Cook thought that the lot was low and that would make
the roof mounted equipment even more visible from Cook Street.
Mr. Harold Housley indicated that they were going to be bringing in
extra dirt to raise the pad site.
Commissioner Cook stated that he would like to see a site plan.
Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin to grant
preliminary approval subject to the conditions in the staff report
and the following. Carried 4-0-1 (Chairman Gregory abstaining)
1. That a section through the building from the Cook Street and
Hovley Lane intersection be provided along with a line of sight
drawing assuring that roof mounted equipment will not be
visible.
4. CASE NO: 270 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BOB SANDIFER, P.O. Box 1008, Rancho
Miraae, CA 92270.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 13,000
square foot industrial building.
LOCATION: Southwest corner Mediterranean and Beacon Hill.
ZONE: S.I.
P
5
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 12. 1985
ZONE: S.I.
Commission had continued this case at it's last meeting with items to
be addressed by the applicant at his next submittal.
Mr. Joy indicated that all of the Items of concern had been
addressed. The applicant submitted a brochure on the type of block
to be used and the type of tile.
Commission had no further concerns with this case.
It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Martin
to grant preliminary approval as submitted. Carried 3-0
2. CASE NO: 279 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TRIAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, c/o Strother
Construction Company Inc., 74-990 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of change from brick to
painted concrete.
LOCATION: Southwest corner Cook Street and Hovley Lane.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
Mr. Chuck Strother, applicant, indicated that he was requesting to
change the veneer brick to painted concrete in a desert tone color.
Commissioner Martin indicated that the commission requested photos
and colors to be used when the final drawings are submitted.
Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Holden to
approve the change from brick to painted concrete. Carried 3-0
3. CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE - COVERED PARKING
Mr. Smith explained that the City of Rancho Mirage is going to
require covered parking and questioned if the commission thought
that Palm Desert should also require this.
Commissioner Holden thought that we should encourage it to applicants
but that it should not be required. He noted that there are many
different ways to provide shade for parking areas than covered
parking. Chairman Gregory felt that it should not be required
either.
9
1A
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 12, 1985
ZONE: S.I.
Commission had continued this case at It's last meeting with items to
be addressed by the applicant at his next submittal.
Mr. Joy indicated that all of the items of concern had been
addressed. The applicant submitted a brochure on the type of block
to be used and the type of tile.
Commission had no further concerns with this case.
It was moved by Commissioner Holden, seconded by Commissioner Martin
to grant preliminary approval as submitted. Carried 3-0
2. CASE NO: 279 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TRIAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, c/o Strother
Construction Company Inc., 74-990 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of change from brick to
painted concrete.
LOCATION: Southwest corner Cook Street and Hovley Lane.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
Mr. Chuck Strother, applicant, indicated that he was requesting to
change the veneer brick to painted concrete in a desert tone color.
Commissioner Martin indicated that the commission requested photos
and colors to be used when the final drawings are submitted.
Moved by Commissioner Martin, seconded by Commissioner Holden to
approve the change from brick to painted concrete. Carried 3-0
3. CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE - COVERED PARKING
Mr. Smith explained that the City of Rancho Mirage is going to
require covered parking and questioned if the commission thought
that Palm Desert should also require this.
Commissioner Holden thought that we should encourage it to applicants
but that it should not be required. He noted that there are many
different ways to provide shade for parking areas than covered
parking. Chairman Gregory felt that it should not be required
either.
3
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION
CASE NO: 279 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS)• TRIAD DEVELOPMENT, c/o Strother Construction ,
74-990 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT• Preliminary approval of architectural
Plans for an industrial/office complex.
LOCATION: Southwest corner Cook Street and Hovley Lane.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the
applicant, the architectural commission approved this case.
Date of Action: October 22, 1985
Vote: Carried 4-0-1 (Chairman Gregory abstaining)
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the
City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes.
73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260
TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION ACTION
CASE NO: 279 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TRIAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, c/o Strother Construction
Company Inc., 74-990 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of change from brick to painted
concrete.
LOCATION: Southwest corner Cook Street and Hovley Lane.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
Upon reviewing the submitted plans and presentations by staff and by the
applicant, the architectural commission approved the change.
Date of Action: November 12, 1985
Vote: Carried 3-0
(An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the
City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.)
STAFF COMMENTS: Please read the attached minutes.
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
OCTOBER 22. 1985
1. That the secondary graphics be deleted leaving letters only.
2. That the easterly sign be mounted lower on the wall.
2. CASE N0: 278 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): NANCO DESIGN INC.. ELEPHANT BAR, 800
Miramonte Drive. Santa Barbara. CA 93109.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary conceptual approval
of plans to remodel existina commercial building.
LOCATION: Southeast corner Highway 111and San Luis Rev.
ZONE: C-1 S.P.
Mr. Smith explained that the applicant had received approval of city
council and planning commission but that the plans had been changed
since that approval. He indicated that it was now before this
commission for .conceptual approval only and that he must return to
city council for approval of the chanaes. Application for approval
of a monument sign was also submitted.
Commissioner Cook questioned the other sians that appear on the
plans. Mr. Smith indicated that only the monument sign was being
submitted at this time.
Commissioner Leuna noted that the Property Owner's Association had
approved the plans and that he had no comments.
It was moved by Commissioner Holden. seconded by Commissioner Cook
to grant conceptual approval subject to the following conditions.
1. That no more than one monument sign be permitted. and that it be
located alona the Frontage Road.
Carried 4-0-1 (Commissioner Martin abstainina)
3. CASE'NO: 279 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TRIAD 'DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. c/o Strother
Construction Company Inc.. 74-990 Velie Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
4
MINUTES
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
OCTOBER 22, 1985
NATURE OF 'PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of
architectural plans for an industrial/office complex.
LOCATION: Southwest corner Cook Street and Hovley Lane.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
Mr. Smith indicated that staff -was concerned with the extensive use
of black glass in this environment.
Commissioner Martin indicated concern with the roof mounted
mechanical equipment being visible and suggested that the glass be
extended to screen the equipment. He also questioned the type of
glass material being used.
Daniela Bogdan, applicant, stated that she could send a sample of
the material for the commission's review.
Commissioner Cook thought that the lot was low and that would make
the roof mounted equipment even more visible from Cook Street.
Mr. Harold Housley indicated that they were going to be bringing in
extra dirt to raise the pad site.
Commissioner Cook stated that he would like to see a site plan.
Moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner Martin to grant
preliminary approval subject to the conditions in the staff report
and the following. Carried 4-0-1 (Chairman Gregory abstaining)
1. That a section through the building from the Cook Street and
Hovley Lane intersection be provided along with a line of sight
drawing assuring that roof mounted equipment will not be
visible.
4. CASE NO: 270 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): BOB SANDIFER, P.O. Box 1008, Rancho
Mirage, CA 92270.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of a 13,000
square foot industrial building.
LOCATION: Southwest corner Mediterranean and Beacon Hill.
ZONE: 5.1.
5
AGENDA ITEM NO. III-B-2
DATE: October 22, 1985
ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION
CASE NO: 279 C
APPLICANT (AND ADDRESS): TRIAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, C/O Strother Construction
Company, Inc. 74-990 Valle Way, Palm Desert, Ca 92260.
NATURE OF PROJECT/APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval of architectural
plans for an industrial/office complex.
LOCATION: Southwest corner Cook Street and Hovley Lane.
ZONE: S.I. S.P.
DISCUSSION•
The three, two story office/light industrial buildings contain 62,634 square
feet of floor area. Building #1 fronts onto Cook Street and has 13,650 square
feet on the first floor and 8,580 square feet on the second floor for a total
22,230 square feet.
Building #2 fronts onto Hovley Lane and has 11,700 square feet on the first
floor and 7,644 square feet on the second floor for a total of 19,344 square
feet.
Building #3 fronts onto Eclectic Street and has 12,740 square feet on the
first floor and 8,320 square feet on the second floor for a total of 21,060
square feet.
These two story buildings will each be a maximum of 27 feet in height.
The site is served by a perimeter driveway. Access to the site is via 3 entry
points, one from Eclectic, one from Hovley and one from Cook Street.
The lower level of the building will be brick while the upper level will make
extensive use of black glass. Roof mounted equipment is located behind screen
walls. Commission may wish to look into the heat gain problem associated with
the extent of glass used in the buildings.
A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted which provides an acceptable
basis for the final landscape plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the commission review the preliminary plans for Case 279 C, and grant
preliminary approval subject to the following conditions:
STAFF REPORT 279 C CONTINUED
1. Construction plans shall be submitted for approval to the City Fire
Marshal prior to issuance of building permits. All conditions shall
be made a part of construction and no certificate of occupancy shall
be issued until completed.
2. Final construction drawings, including a final landscaping, grading,
lighting, amenities, trash storage, walkway layout, irriqation plans
and sign program shall be submitted to the Architectural Review
Commission. No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be given
by the department of community development to this proiect until the
aforementioned approved plans and construction shall have been
completed.
/dlg
CM OF PALL 022271m7
73-51 red Waring Drive peom 082'. "9 C& 222SO
F-0 (a hl N ca
/�R51r�I1 /\�l�S� M 2y��9 7 ,,�I - ,.,1 D'ESIG' �,l�,,,A REN/flEW MARL
;DP'tLQ�1✓UUII gGH IRWV9U:11 . WI®��Y IIQ�® �b��i�Q�®�IL�I� sa V eas a p0an Q9Ing d1rd a on a
TRIAD DEVELOPMENT / STROTHER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.
Applicant I pease print)
P. 0. Box 1514 619-568-2718
Mailing Address Telephone
Palm Desert, CA 92261
Ci ly Slats Zip -Cods
REQUEST: (Describe specific nature of approval requested).
Preliminary design and landscape plan for 63,000 Sq. Ft. of industrial/
office complex.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Parcel 1 - Tract Map 17452 - Book 130 Pgs 14-17- Riverside County Record)
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.
EXISTING ZONING S +.L.c
Property Owner Authonzanon TM undersigned states that they ore the owner Is) of the property described herein and hereby give author
ization for the ))ling of this appl"jon.
1 DO BY MY SIGNATURE ON THIS AGREEMENT,
Appiicont's Signature
(FOR STAFF USE ONLY) Environmental Status
❑ Ministerial Act E.A. No.
❑ Categorical Exemption
❑ Negative Declaration
❑ Other
Fj
Absolve the City of Palm Desert of oil liabilities regarding any deed restrictions
the may D ppirabN to the property described herein.
GO r j �7
r Date
Accepted by:
Reference Case No.
CITY OF PALM DESERT
APPLICATION FORM
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD PROCESS
Design Review Of:
Light Industrial an
Office Complex
CASE NO.
Triad Development/Strother Construction Co. Inc.
pp scant
Agreement of compliance to be signed by those applying for review.
I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree, to comply with
all the following requirements, and understand that the Depart-
ment of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or
allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirma-
tion has been received by the Department of Environmental Services.
The development of this project shall conform substantially to all
development platis submitted in behalf of this case, and as revised
according to the Design Review Board process. Any minor change
requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any
substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board.
All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State,
City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied
with as part of the development process.
This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this
project, commencing within one year from approval date and being
promptly completed.
Landscaping (with irrigation system) shall be installed prior to
final inspection and receiving certificate of occupancy.
Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving shall be provided along
the full frontage of the lot by means of installation prior to
final inspection or other provisions as approved by the City
Engineer. Construction shall conform to City Standards and all
requirements of the City Engineer.
All new and existing electrical distribution lines, telephone,
cable antenna television, and similar service wires or cables,
which are adjacent to and provide service to the property being
developed shall be installed underground as a part of development
fr the nearest existing pole not on the property being developed
re uir by nicip 1 Code.
A
low
Signature Date
Department of Environmental Services Form is
VIN80:111V 3 'lunw w-lVd
AS NMWWO
3UJLN33 3JLVH0dH03 N003 31V0 NOI8IA31d ON I 31V0j NOISIAMU ON MJLWO
.61 +0
77='
Am
I :w
01V 47,SjjVjlg, 01 71 ;6 J,Cjj.
F7o TjT 6�5.6
--YH W—wt I
6
41
fl
cz
;I
-z
C)
RA
I
10 z
t I
03
F-
fu
�� m�-�
To
o -W�
oz
ffi tu
ir � � i
Z- a 0
a: LU
WE
i:-
tc
ILILft: ic H; C ic U--
0 Lu
13 13
CA
CA
ILA IW
VL ci- 4
'�r f''
flL
In
Q. io
QL
U- kp
L cc
tc th IT
I;
< IL 0 4 C,
�7Z
,J � [h � O �j Y �{1 � � � �
4- kD
w
L13
^r
xs"
r 41
-
® -f
OATE j-7-j-,!!)!5j NO
DRAWN BY
(71
(jlL
DRAWINGS INCLUDING ALL
REVISION
DA19
INC.
j HOWARD F. THOMPSON & 557.7922
ASS®CIATES,
ARCHITECTURE / LAND PLANNING 7652E ABTON STREET
Iq VIN E, CA. 92774 [774]
DETAILS, SPECIFICATIONS AND INFORMATION. ARE THE SOLE PROPERTY ANOI COPYRIGHT OF HOWARD F. THOMPSON 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.,AND ARE FOR USE DIU THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT AND SHAY
NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK WITHOUT AGREEMENT AND WRITTEN PERMISSION
E:
ECLECTIC STREET
u
COOK STREET
tt�
9
0
1112= 1986 CEO ATTRAM56 P.03 __ y_S 10:38 LITEFA`t FPI_M LITELiNES. ES 000 65094656 P.04
10:37
LIT'EF.4-.
FROM L:TELINE= -_
TOTAL PLUMBER
OF
FIXTURES:
16
REPORT NO: LTLI1248
REPORT
'!sat
LTLI124B
PRINTOUT AREA #1
PRINTOUT
AREA
#2
PARKING AREA
LIGH`1: l' WITO Mry`AL
HALIDE
LAMP
PARKING
rFFA LIGHIIIN5
AITH
KETAL,
HALIDE
LAMF`
�_•o
25
raa
WATT
SINGLES 1PV , � 20'
szr�._LE.- .., P.r. r_ F, u�
A�c� . �„ ::L7>>rI7
ABOVE GRADE
250
��1f-1'1
- SINGLES S
H, i 'uV
'''
,�
? o•
'E
Acc,�,.
GRADE
'hAINTL.Prriv " FACTOR =
L•i.E
72
MAINTh'Pi
uc t Y ACTIOR
=
.72
VALUES
ARE HORIZONTAL FOOTCA.NDLES
-----------
VALUES
.ARE HORIZONTAL
PORT•CAMDLES
AT GRADE
C00
T REET
AT GRADL+
4GO.
+
IJC
+
15
-h
1
+ +
•Li '�'V.00 u 1
+
w , C
1
_
-a1
•~J
+
-
- T
•
+
-
2.1
i
85
%
+
47
+,
:8
-I-
!1
-
+
-
+
•e5
+
.3s
470. I
+
+
+ T + +
T
-
+
+- +
+
t
-
4
--
°i
+
+
+
+
T
+
-
.19
.15
.32
.__. . .46 ..4 ,5 4.7
4,7
2.5
.96
_
.�.._ .:o
,..
.7
_.._
.00
,___
•_`:
191
215
4,7
4.7
2,-5
.90
,37
I
+.
+
T +
+ +
+
+
+
+ +
+
T
+
+
--
T
4•
+
T
_
+
.39
`_5
..-_
57 70 1.3 3.2 3.7
?
3.2
1.4
.88
.88 1.4
.3.
S.70.2
1.4
M
.0
1.4
3.2
.3.7
3.7
3.2
1.3
.hU
+
+
'F
'-
-
+
v
T
,
+
1,0
77 1.2 2.1 2,6
2.5
2.1
1.2
87
.87 1.2
2.6
2.6
2.1
1--_
.._
.91
1.3
20
2.6
2.6
20
1.1
.50
.78
.36
.73
440. ;
+
+
+
+ +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
T
+
+
+
+
+
+
2.1
2.4
1.3
.72 E,2 .78 86 .95
:=
85
.75
Se
.59 76 _ -
.46
.9F=
w
:9
09
.76
96
99
1.0
B9
.72
.44
430. ;
+
+
+
+ T
+
+
+
-
-
4
+
+
+
+
+
+
1_
e
=:. 1
1
v
_
.41
.39
38
.30 .39 at
44
a4
. -„
. 4'_'
.09
Qs
Li
.44
.4=3
.54
.03
.46
.3_,
amid
um
.
.6
.70
.44
^ Q
+
+
+
+ +
r +
a-
+
+
+ + +
+
+
T
--
+
+
+
+
+
+
-F
+
. .
4.9
3._
1,i
i:7
.24
.24
.24 .24 25
.37
.3.l
.:c;K
2:.
,,. _.
:26
'20..�.
r-T
__
0.7
��9
�R."i
.32
_69 .3�0 .2B
.2c
410. I
+
-
+
+
+
+
3.8
3.0
1.4
62
.44
•33
460. I
+
+
+
+ + +
.58
.41
1.5
1.7
1.2
56.24 .21
-
_
+
+
. Sa
.71
1 . 1
.77
.49 .32 . 15c
+
+
+ IS
1.2
T
f>7
.60
91
.71
47 .31 .21
/
+
370. ;
+
11
+
+ + +
1.6
.74
�r
r
+
+
1.5
.66
350.
+
T
+
T 4 +
_•A
3.1
1.6
.35
1,n
.7E•
•
.S9 .20
+
+
+
+ If
+
+
_,.J
S.2
1.7
.62 .37 _
1.2
.72
I
330 ,
+
+
+
+ +
+
+
",
1y_
i to
1 ._
� •,4
�
_
95
... _
-
_ .. _
- 1
..
.... �
i.-
_
_ . 1
1.5
1
._.
.701
.47
+
+
T
T
T
+
+
+
.
310.
+
+
+
+
d
1 • ?
1 '.-
ill
35
_,
_•
6'_
_ `
S0
.35
;
76
1 . 1
81
. 51
2
.32
300.
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
T
+
r
T
+
+
72
1.0
76
.50
351
.._
5
.5L
t _
46
.53
.51
A5
4z
03
42
04
. Z5
290.
+
+
+
+
+
T
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
._-
so
2p
27
.27
.26
.27
.17
.23
.17
1.2
10
1.0
.51�
.77
.cliff
'24
.ter_'•
'
380.
+
+
+
+
+
T
+
_
`
_.l
�.:6
1 .2
.59
.32
. 2S
-
20
. 16
. n
1
10
16
.16
117
, 17
.10
, 1L
270
+
+
+
+
+
+
i
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
alit
4.3
1.2
1.6
.44
.-_
._
.:7
10
.._
11
10
.10
11
.ii
,i1
'10
.09
.60
:
260.
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
�>
4.
3.2
1.6
.59
.65
__
_
>_
.1
.f19
08
U3
07
.07
.0
.00
.07
05
255. I
;
3,2
2.S
1.0
.54
.`35
.4.2
_
.12
.10
.11
,D8
•97
Qv
.'JF,
loc
.06
.06
.45
.V°
240
+
-f
+
+
'''
+
a-
-I.
;:
._
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
. ,
'
1 , 1
1 . 2
. SO
.47
1.4
.50
, 27
. iQ
, 10
,,
.07
. ?
.5
0
. 05
• U�
,05
.04
.04
,04
200 ;
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
a•
+
--
+
LL
+
+
+
+
+
+
SO
.70
.53
36
2.2
.52
.26
.15
.10
.0
.05
,05
.00
.00
.04
.04
44
•,03
Zan. 1
+
+
+
+
_
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
35
.60
.47
.:37,
2.0
I
45
24
.1a
.09
.t7
.05
.00
.00
.04
.04
104
.04
.03
2.2
1
-
27
16
US
.05
05
05
,
I
37
58
.48
.32
.10
.06
.
.04
.04
.04
200, i
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
T
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
.59
.82
.60
.38
1.4
so
is
.1"
17
.09
.07
.06
.06
.06
.06
.06
.05
.05
I
1.4
1.6
1.1
48
'98
;=i
.2?
.+_
.11
Ic
.08
.5e
.07
07
.07
oe
.07
,06
160.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
3.8
2.9
1.0
S4
h0:
--
_c
1°
Il
11
110
.11
11
11
.10
.09
w
+
-t
'®
4.9
3.2
1.7
.60
.41
__
_-
in
,1
.1"
.16
117
:1.7
,15
.12
y
r
+
?
Sys
2.1
1.5
s6
-
-.-
.27
.28
.._•,
.2
.27
.27
.23
.17
.57
159. 1
+
+
+
+
+
T
+
-
+
+
2.1
2,4
=.2
.521
.32
_
_.-
-.
.- _
=3
.51
. -`
.02
.43
.62
.34
105
80
1 . 1
.77
.47
.31
50
-_
- _.
; ..
.95
.75
.00
.67
:._
50
.35
I
134,
+
+
+
+
-
T
+
T
+
+
i
.49
.74
.57
.30
'2
07
..._
sit
ill
1 , 0
1 , 0
so
70
7
.47
hi_
120, 1
+
+
+
+ + +
.44
72
.56
.37 .25 .1
.94
.60
11i1,
+
+
+ + +
+,
+
.61
.88
.64
.41 .27 .16
I
10Ti,
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
1,5
1.6
1 . 1
.50 . 2e .17
lit
17t:
i
1
yq„
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
3.B
2.9
1.4
.55 32 .19
�"
1.5
,07
t
\
�rF
. ,
e0,
a�
+
+
+
1.7
+ + +
I
4,q
3.2
.51 .30 .23
�
1,6
.75
,
70.
+
+
+
+ + +
+
+
3.8
3.1
1.6
.61 .3e 25
1.2
.69
r
60, i
+
+
+
+
G
_-.�_-.
-
2.2
2.4
1,3
.6?
��
-
@0
56
I
�
c0.
+
+
+
+
+
T
'
,
.94
1 . 1
. GI'
.35
, 64
.03
r
c�1
, _
_
-
. 0
?l'_1 71 . k_.1
2 �
F.5 c�Cl
, _ . _
; 47
, �: C7
_ -
; t o
�, Id Fi:-
, •_
c v
50
4
51
35
59
-
Ur
6.3
.66
71
.67
50
33
i
.
.
.
.
30 • ;
+
T
+
+ + + +
+ +
+
+
+
+ +
�
+,
+
+
i
+
r
+
+
+
+
+
3r
=.4
1.1 1. i.e 1._
1.2 .61
.71
.81
1.2
1,8 1,5
?i
1,5
ire
+,5
1.2
,8s
15Z
1.?j8
-
_
_
.el
„
,E41
_•2
2
T
T
T
+ + T +
+ +
+
+
+
+ +
_
r
_
+
+
+
+
+
+
IIl+
-
'
, 07
, =Y_.
As
20 si o 3 ? 3.0
2.1 1 , 2
.90
1.2
211
u. o 0 1 _
Y
1 •.,
vo
_.
_. i
0.0
2.2
3.0
210
.98
.61
,'•s
?r:
0.9
1.8 1.9 4.6 3.9
1.8 .78
162
.78
10
3.9
_ _.
0.3
L.0
30
1.8
.71
.41
.24
14
_
7
'
-
-
_.
��.
26
.52
1 . 5 4.5 4 ..5
1,5 170
.46
...,
,
.. -. �
, -.
_
• ,.
-
r _
[,�,
1 �.
23
.11
. 10
1
-,
"1`LL_rtl_-
_
_
i"T_._yt,
i0.._
,-'-__., '(�^_
�. r-�y C^
1C�'1
11❑_..1�.1.
"?fl,^1i1;7`
-
__
-�.1:
�
-.----_
FEET
�CLEI�TIC
:,�
OCALE: 1 INCH = 20.0
-�
-
: ,
AVERAGE F0010mNALES =
1,30 �
yF.,._
.: ___.
_
.77
MA: AUM FOOTtCANDLES =
6. _
MADiTFSUN
FQ
T'C4NLiE
. _
_
. _,
MINIMUM FOOTICA7DI RS =
9
2i2t;IIiU:_
= ou
'-..,__
._ -
. 13
MAX,101N• RAT! = 69,6
_
[`. _...r�iTil.
-
__.
.
AVG./MIN RA71_ 10.7
1
h";,fA1N.
- --- -
25.0
_
THE ABOVE RESULT_ 1. "GIN; :LEAF ....r1: S.
PHOTOMETRI'= D l USE i' FGR. THE. ALCULATi'I'=
IF BASED ON E LABL IZHL- _. FRO: -: PE AND-Pt_'BLISHEL''
LAMP RATINGS. FIELD _ _P1 n,I'-L "-_DEPEND DEPE D ON ATTUAL
LAMP, BALLAST, ELEt R!CKL RA! TERISTICS.
)VE + SULTz PRE BASED ON USING CLEAR LAMPS.
mATZ DATA 't:_L AS jNPUT FOR THESE 'T.r.LOULATi(.iN
L ON EETABLIEHED 1. - ='F'ocEDuRE5 ANU PUBLIISHELD
T1 OS. FIELD PERFORMANCE WILL DEPEND ON ACTUAL.
_A,I 4IT. -LEST SITE ',H.-x...',--R TICS.
TOTAL P.04