Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout41MF DEEP CANYON TENNIS CLUBMinutes Palm Desert Planning Commission September 14, 1977 VIII. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) PaK' A motion to find the proposed projects in conformance with the adopted Palm Desert General Plan by Planning Commission Resolution No. 282, was made by Commissioner Snyder, seconded by Commissioner Kelly; carried unanimously (5-0). IX. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ITEMS A. Review of Cases acted on by the Design Review Board on September 6, 1977. Mr. Cipriani reviewed Case Nos. 85MF, 71MF, 86MF, and 8MF noting they all complied with the conditions and City standards. There was some discussion regarding the length of County approval effectiveness. A motion was made by Commissioner Kryder to approve the Design Review Board actions by Planning Commission Resolution No. 283, seconded by Commissioner Kelly; carried unanimously (5-0). X. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Consideration of a Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission and Design Review Board on September 29, 1977 at 7:00 p.m. The Commission approved the date and directed the staff to notify the Design Review Board. B. Consideration of a one-year ex ion o period of approval of Final Construction Drawings allow ns ruction of 52-units at Deep Caeyon Tennis Club. C se No. 41MF. A motion was .made by Commission Readlileto approve a one-vear extension of time on the Final Construct rawings for Case No. 41MF by Planning Commission Resolution No. 284, seconded by Commissioner Kelly; carried unanimously (5-0). C. Special item added to agenda at this time, review of Case No. C/Z 07-76. Chairman Berkey noted a conflict of interest and left the room at this time. Vice -Chairman Reading noted that he thought the Commission needed more time to review this case and last minute items were not appreciated by the Commission. Mr. Roland Sweet spoke to the Commission stating that the President of the proposed clinic had asked him to inform the Commission that they were withdrawing their request to develop the clinic in Palm Desert. He noted that the City Council was not aware of this at the time they reviewed the - case and he felt this fact may have altered their decision on the density issue. Commissioner Kelly moved and Commissioner Snyder seconded, that the Case be continued to the October 4th meeting; carried (4-0) Berkey abstained. C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 284 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FIND- INGS AND APPROVING A ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF PERIOD OF TIME OF FINAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS TO ALLOW C��131D3i 52 UNITS AT DEEP CANYON TENNIS CASE NO. WHEREAS, t lanning Commission of the City of Palm Desert did recei ication from J. M. PETERS COMPANY, INC. requesting approval of a one year extension of the period of approval of Final Construction Drawings to allow for construction of 52 units at Deep Canyon Tennis Club on Property more particularly described as: APN 630-180-006-8 APN 628-150-012-3 APN 628-050-013-5 WHEREAS, on September 14, 1977, the Planning Commission did consider this request for time extension approval; and WHEREAS, at that time, upon receiving and considering the testi- mony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be heard, said commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist to approve the one year time extension: 1. The proposed project does ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. 2. The proposed project conforms to all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed project is compatible with existing develop- ment in the area. 4. The proposed project is in conformance with the City's General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and con- stitute the findings of the Commission in this case. 2. That it does hereby approve a one year extension of the period of approval of final construction drawings for Case No. 41MF. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plan- ning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, held on the 14th day of Sep- tember, 1977, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KRYDER, KELLY, SNYDER, READING NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE GEORGE BERKEY, Chairman ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary /ks AM r! 111 wu September 8, 1977 Planning Cwmission City of Palm Desert 45275 Prickly Pear Lane Palm Desert, California 92260 RE: DEEP CANYON TENNIS CIAB, PALM DESERT CASE 41 W Gentlemen: We respectfully request an extension on the approval obtained by Kaiser Aetna one year ago for 52 condominium units at Deep Canyon Tennis Club. We want to assure you that all existing oonditions will be adhered to. At the present time, we are in plan check for these units in the Building Department. GO:iI,zr- of 21:k��nnm 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 April 12, 1977 Mr. Edward G. Roach, Division Counsel c/o Kaiser Aetna The Ordway Building, Kaiser Center Oakland, California 94666 Re: Deep Canyon Tennis Club Dear Mr. Roach: Case No. 5MF was the plot plan approval for the final 180 dwelling units of the Deep Canyon Tennis Club project. The purpose of the plot plan review is to study detailed architectural, construction, and landscape plans prior to submittal to the Building and Safety Department, for building permits. Case No. 5MF was approved sub- ject to five conditions (attached) and a provision stipulated in the minutes of the meeting that the ten (10) buildings east of High- way 74 and south of Tamarisk Street would be reduced to a single story in height. The construction approval as part of Case No. 5MF may not be im- plemented as the approval has expired. However, a portion of the 5MF project was re -submitted for approval as Case No. 41MF. The Planning Commission approved the request for 52 units (16 units on the east half of Rancho Segura Lane and 36 units on Ken Rosewall Lane) by Resolution No. 180 (attached). Said approval is still valid and will expire on September 14, 1977. The remaining units will have to be resubmitted for planning approval before building permits can be issued. If you have any additional -questions concerning this project, please don't hesitate to call. CSincerely, PAUL A. ILLIAMS, DIRECTOR Department of Environmental Services City of Palm Desert, California Attachments (as noted) PAW/mj KA/5ERLEI March 30, 1977 Palm Desert Planning Dept. City Hall Palm Desert, Ca. 92260 Subject: Deep Canyon Gentlemen: Please forward copies of printed documents and any information pertinent to the above project contained in File 5MF dated 7/15/74. Thank you for your attention to this matter. ER:rf Sincerely yours,.y' oEdward G. Roac Division Counsel RECEIVED APR 5 1977 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CITY OF PALMDESERT THE ORDWAY BUILD ING, KAISER CENTER, OAK LAND, CA LIFORN 1 A 94666 �.r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE September 15, 1976 APPLICANT Kaiser -Aetna (Deep Canyon Tennis Club) •2082 Business Center Drive, Suite 275 Irvine, California 92715 Attention: Eugene Ball CASE NO. 41MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of September 14, 1976 •CONTINUED TO DENIED xxx APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 180 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission Applicant County Road Department CVCWD 1 (.) 1. PLANNING C0114ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMI;SION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF SEP'TF_1411ER 7, 1976 AND CASE 41MF.FROM THE AUGUST 10, 1976 MEETING. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Dosert, did review the Design Review Board actions of September 7, 1976, approving: Case No. 26C - Minor Revision to a Previously Approved Project for SAI4DY SIERRA NEVADA INC. Case No. 36C - A 13,000 Square Foot Commercial Building for SANDY SIERRA NEVADA INC. Case No. 35C - A 3,700 Square Foot Commercial Building for HAROLD MCCORMICK Case No. 47MF - Clubhouse Addition and Snack Bar for IRONWOOD Case No. 37C - A 4,000 Square Foot Commercial Building for ROY CARVER Case No. 4114F - Additional Units at DEEP CANYON TENNIS CLUB from the August 10, 1976 meeting WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and.considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of September 7, 1976 and Case No. 4114F fi ::n the August 10, 1976 meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of September 7, 1976 and Case No. 41MF from the August 10, 197G meeting. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, held on the 14th day of September, 1976, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, MILLS, VAN DE MARK, WILSON . NOES: KELLY ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE . ROY WI SON, CfTAIRMAN ATTEST: PAUL A, WILLIAMS, SLiCRETARY Sept___er 9, 1976 J . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 41MF 1. The construction of this project shall conform substantially to Case No. 5MF and Case No. 41MF, labeled Exhibit A-P, and the requirements herein. 2. Landscaping and sprinkler systems shall be' constructed during each phase and shall be made operational prior to occupancy in each phase. 3. The water retention basins shall be installed and m intained•in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. 4. All requirements of any applicable law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as a part of construction. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicants Signature ' � I 1 1 1 CITY OF PALM DESERT Recommended Conditions of Approval P;P, 5MF 1. The construction of this project shall conform substantially to the P.P. No. 5MF, labeled Revised Exhibit A and the require- ments herein. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, complete detailed, trash storage, exterior lighting, fence, and auxiliary equipment plans shall be considered and approved by the Director of Environmental Services. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued for any dwelling unit until such construction is completed and approved by the City. 3. Landscaping and sprinkler systems shall be constructed during each phase and shall be made operational prior to occupancy in each phase. .4. The proposed retention basins shall b.e installed in a manner .acceptable to the County of Riverside Road Department and the Coachella Valley County Water District. Written notice of such approval shall be sent to the City's Director of Environmental Services. Furthermore, the retention areas indicated in yellow on the Revised Exhibit A map shall be studied as to the feasibility of their installation. The decision reached on these future basins shall be made subject to the approval of the County Road Department and the Director of Environmental Services. Approval of P.P. 5AIF shall specifically exclude the previously -approved surface storm - water run-off system. 5. All requirements of any applicable law, ordinance or regula- tion of the State of California, City of Palm Desert, and any other applicable governmental entity shall be complied with as a part of construction. REPORT ON 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: August 10, 1976 Next Phase of Deep Canyon Tennis Club - Construction Drawings CASE NO.: 41MF ZONE: PR-7 LOCATION: Highway 74 Frontage Road, Northerly of Haystack Road APPLICANT: KAISER AETNA NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of 13 Buildings with 52 Units DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB approves this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action Motion Made By Seconded By: Vote: August 10, 1976 Minturn Leung 4-0 Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: '�t:Opzj cow' � Il 7D��c r�f� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE September 15, 1976 APPLICANT Kaiser -Aetna (Deep Canyon Tennis Club) 2082 Business Center Drive, Suite 275 Irvine, California 92715 Attention: Eugene Ball CASE NO. 41MF The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of September 14, 1976 CONTINUED TO DENIED xxx APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 180 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission Applicant County Road Department CVCWD PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 180 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF SEPTEMBER 7, 1976 AND CASE 41MF FROM THE AUGUST 10, 1976 MEETING. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, did review the Design Review Board actions of September 7, 1976, approving: Case No. 26C - Minor Revision to a Previously Approved Project for SANDY SIERRA NEVADA INC. Case No. 38C - A 13,000 Square Foot Commercial Building for SANDY SIERRA NEVADA INC. Case No. 35C - A 3,700 Square Foot Commercial Building for HAROLD McCORMICK Case No. 47MF - Clubhouse Addition and Snack Bar for IRONWOOD Case No. 37C - A 4,000 Square Foot Commercial Building for ROY CARVER Case No. 41MF - Additional Units at DEEP CANYON TENNIS CLUB from the August 10, 1976 meeting WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be heard, said Commission did find sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of September 7, 1976 and Case No. 41MF fi :,i the August 10, 1976 meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of September 7, 1976 and Case No. 41MF from the August 10, 1976 meeting. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, held on the 14th day of September, 1976, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, MILLS, VAN DE MARK, WILSON NOES: KELLY ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE S. ROY WI SON, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY September 9, 1976 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 41MF 1. The construction of this project shall conform substantially to Case No. 5MF and Case No. 41MF, labeled Exhibit A-P, and the requirements herein. 2. Landscaping and sprinkler systems shall be constructed during each phase and shall be made operational prior to occupancy in each phase. 3. The water retention basins shall be installed and m intained in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. 4. All requirements of any applicable law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as a part of construction. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a building permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date Applicants Signature Gam' r 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: August 10. 1976_ REPORT ON: Next Phase of Deep Canyon Tennis Club - Construction Drawings CASE NO.: 41MF ZONE: PR-7 LOCATION: Highway 74 Frontage Road, Northerly of Haystack Road APPLICANT: KAISER AETNA NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of 13 Buildings with 52 Units DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB approves this project, subject to the attached X0iXX)ft1x x revisions. Date of Action: August 10, 1976 Motion Made By: Minturn Seconded By: Leung Vote: 4-0 yes Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: See attached minutes. 8/ 10/ 76 CASE NO. 41MF STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Defer action to the next meeting and direct the applicant to revise the grading plan to reflect required retention basins and to resolve the total matter of drainage in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. NOTES: 1. Preliminary approval was approved on Case No. 5MF on July 15, 1974. A portion of the project was subsequently built. See attached materials. 2. A major concern of the initial approval dealt with on -site and off -site drainage. Specific requirements were made relative to this matter. These requirements are not reflected in the construction drawings. (P. C. Forms) 73-021 El PASEO P.O.Boz 1648 Palm Desert Ca.92260 Ph. 346-0611 July 16, 1974 To: El Dorado Homes P. O. Box 1505 Riverside, Calif. 92502 Re: P. C. Approval of Case No. 5MF Dear Sir: On July 15. 1974 the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert did consider and approve Case No. 5MF subject to the attached conditions. This decision is subject to a thirty (30) day appeal period. Very truly yours, Paul A. Williams Director of Environmental Services cc: File . CITY OF PALM DESERT Recommended Conditions of Approval P:P. 5MF 1. The construction of this project shall conform substantially to the P.P. No. 5MF, labeled Revised Exhibit A and the require- ments herein. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, complete detailed, trash storage, exterior lighting, fence, and auxiliary equipment plans shall be considered and approved by the Director of Environmental Services. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued for any dwelling unit until such construction is completed and approved by the City. 3. Landscaping and sprinkler systems shall be constructed during each phase and shall be made operational prior to occupancy in each phase. 4. The proposed retention basins shall be installed in a manner acceptable to the County of Riverside Road Department and the Coachella Valley County Water District. Written notice of such approval shall be sent to the City's Director of Environmental Services. Furthermore, the retention areas indicated in yellow on the Revised Exhibit A map shall be studied as to the feasibility of their installation. The decision reached on these future basins shall be made subject to the approval of the County Road Department and the Director of Environmental Services. Approval of P.P. 5MF shall specifically exclude the previously -approved surface storm - water run-off system. 5. All requirements of any applicable law, ordinance or regula- tion of the State of California, City of Palm Desert, and any other applicable governmental entity shall be complied with as a part of construction. CITY OF PALM DESERT STAFF REPORT A �� Report on:' Consideration of Plot Plan Case No. 5MF Applicant: E1 Dorado homes for Deep Canyon Tennis Club I. REQUEST: That the Planning Commission approve the Plot Plan for the fourth, fifth, and sixth phases of the Deep Canyon Tennis Club which is to have 170 condominium units arraged in 45 buildings. The first three phases, have been approved and are under construction consisting of 16 model units, the recreaton facilities and 164 condo- minium units arranged in 41 buildings. This matter was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of June 17, 1974. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That it be moved that the Planning Commission approve the Plot Plan for buildng permits subject to the attached conditions. Justification is based upon: 1. Conformance of the proposed development to all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed development does insure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. 3. Compatibility of the proposed development to the existing and proposed development. III. BACKGROUND: A. Description - The subject property is known as Tr. No. 4558. B. Location - east of the State Hwy. 74 frontage road, south of Tamarisk, and north of Haystack. C. Size - This parcel is 29.4 acres and is part of a larger project of 55 acres. D. Total No. of Units - This parcel has 170 units and the total project has 350 units. E. Density - This parcel has 5.8 dwelling units per acre and the overall project has 6.3 dwelling units per acre. F. Type of Units - The units are arranged in four-plex clusters which are one and two stories in height. The units have 2 or 3 bedrooms and would average approx- imately 1,100 sq. ft., somewhat larger than the same unit as was built in the first 3 phases. The one-story buildings will be the same as the others except that they will have only 3 units and will be 11.5 ft. in height. Architecturally, the exterior of both the one-story and two-story units will be designed in the same style as the existing development. Elevations are in a Spanish style with predominantly stucco finish with some wood trim. Pictures of the existing units will be available at the meeting. G. Coverage - Approximately 40% of the area will be covered with structure or paving, this meets Ordinance requirement exactly. H. E.I.R. Finding - The major discretionary decision concerning this project was made before CEQA was in Page 2 effect and therefore, they are exempt according to state guidelines. I. Existing Zoning - R-2-7000 J. Adjacent Zoning - North R-3-4000 and R-1-10,000 South R-3-4000 and R-1-10,000 East 4-1-10,000 West R-2* K. General Plan Commitment - The Cove Communities General Plan indicates the property to be potential medium density residential with 5 - 10 dwelling units per acre. This development conforms to this allocation. L. Proposed Parking - The applicant is proposing 3 parking spaces for each unit 1.5 covered in an attached garage and 1.5 spaces uncovered in adjacent parking areas with the exception that the ten single - story building will have two covered spaces per unit.. M. Utilities - Water and Sewer - Coachella Valley Water District. Power - Southern California Edison N. Previous Actions - Tenative Tract map. No. 4558 of the entire project was approved by the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County, effective December 7, 1971. A conditional use permit was approved by the Board of Supervisors July 25, 1972. Building permits for phase 3 were issued October 25, 1973. IV. DISCUSSION OF PLOT PLAN ELEMENTS The major public improvements, such as extension of sewer and water lines, have been conditioned by the county in their consideration of the tract map. These improvements, including the construction of the private road system have already been completed. The applicant has revised the plans to replace 10 two-story buildings with 10..one-story-structures which in the opinion of staff, would eliminate the concern with a height difference between these buildings and the adjacent single-family homes along Tamerisk. This alteration of design reduces the proposed total number of dwellings by ten units. The revised plot plan and grading plan does provide for water retention basins which will lessen the water run-off problem attributed to this project. The re -designed system of retention basins will be installed within the project and will provide a retention capacity of approximately 1.6 acre-ft. of water - the equivalent of a 25-year storm. The current problems associated with nuisance water should be somewhat decreased due to the reduction of the amount of watering which is needed for the newly -installed landscaping. In the opinion of Staff, water run-off problems due to major storms will only be solved by a city-wide storm water system such as the one described in the Comprehensive Plan for Surface Water Drainage for the Palm Desert Area, August 1966. ith the proposed retention basins, the storm water run-off and nuisance water run-off from remaining development will not add substantially to the existing problems. CITY OF PALM DESERT Recommended Conditions of Approval P.P. 5MF 1. The construction of this project shall conform substantially to the P.P. No. 5MF, labeled Revised Exhibit A and the require- ments herein. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupany, complete detailed, trash storage, exterior lighting, fence, and auxiliary equipment plans shall be considered and approved by the Director of Environmental Services. No Certificate of Occupany shall be issued for any dwelling unit until such construction is completed and approved by the City. 3. Landscaping and sprinkler systems shall be constructed during each phase and shall be made operational prior to occupancy in each phase. 4. The proposed retention basins shall be installed in a manner acceptable to the County of Riverside Road Department and the Coachella Valley County Water District. Written notice of such approval shall be sent to the City's Director of Environmental Services. 5. All requirements of any applicable law, ordinance or regula- tion of the State of California, City of Palm Desert, and any other applicalbe governmental entity shall be complied with as a part of contstruction. 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: August 10, 1976 REPORT ON: Next Phase of Deep Canyon Tennis Club - Construction Drawings CASE NO.: 41MF ZONE: PR-7 LOCATION: Highway 74 Frontage Road, Northerly of Haystack Road APPLICANT: KAISER AETNA INATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Approval of 13 Buildings with 52 Units DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: '*Motion Made By: Seconded By: Vote: August 10, 1976 Reasons for Neg ative Vote (s): An appeal o the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days -of the date of the decision.) STAFF COi0IENTS: See attached. 8/10/76 a CASE NO. 41MF STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Defer action to the next meeting and direct the applicant to revise the grading plan to reflect required retention basins and to resolve the total matter of drainage in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. NOTES: 1. Preliminary approval was approved on Case No. 5MF on July 15, 1974. A portion of the project was subsequently built. See attached materials. 2. A major concern of the initial approval dealt with on -site and off -site drainage. Specific requirements were made relative to this matter. These requirements are not reflected in the construction drawings. (F. C. Forms) 73.021 EL PASEO P.O.Boz 1648 Palm Desert Ca.92260 PA. 346-0611 CITY OF PALM DESERT Recommended Conditions of Approval P.-P. 5MF 1. The construction of this project shall conform substantially to the P.P. No. 5MF, labeled Revised Exhibit A and the require- ments herein. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, complete detailed, trash storage, exterior lighting, fence, and auxiliary equipment plans shall be considered and approved by the Director of Environmental Services. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued for any dwelling unit until such construction is completed and approved by the City. 3. Landscaping and sprinkler systems shall be constructed during each phase and shall be made operational prior to occupancy in each phase. 4. The proposed retention basins shall be installed in a manner acceptable to the County of Riverside Road Department and the Coachella Valley County Water District. written notice of such approval shall be sent to the City's Director of Environmental Services. Furthermore, the retention areas indicated in yellow on the Revised Exhibit A map shall be studied as to the feasibility of their installation. The decision reached on these future basins shall be made subject to the approval of the County Road Department and the Director of Environmental Services. Approval of P.P. 5MF shall specifically exclude the previously -approved surface storm - water run-off system. 5. All requirements of any applicable law, ordinance or regula- tion of the State of California, City of Palm Desert, and any other applicable governmental entity shall be complied with as a part of construction. CITY OF PALM DESERT _ �/� STAFF REPORT Report on:' Consideration of Plot Plan Case No. 5MF Applicant: E1 Dorado Homes for Deep Canyon Tennis Club I. REQUEST: That the Planning Commission approve the Plot Plan for the fourth, fifth, and sixth phases of the Deep Canyon Tennis Club which is to have 170 condominium units arraged in 45 buildings. The first three phases, have been approved and are under construction consisting of 16 model units, the recreaton facilities and 164 condo- minium units arranged in 41 buildings. This matter was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of June 17, 1974. 11, STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That it be moved that the Planning Commission approve the Plot Plan for buildng permits subject to the attached conditions, Justification is based upon: 1. Conformance of the proposed development to all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed development does insure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. 3, Compatibility of the proposed development to the existing and proposed development. III, BACKGROUND: A. Description - The subject property is known as Tr, No. 4558. B. Location - east of the State Hwy. 74 frontage road, south of Tamarisk, and north of Haystack, C, Size -- This parcel is 29,4 acres and is part of a larger project of 55 acres, D. Total No, of Units - This parcel has 170 units and the total project has 350 units. E, Density - This parcel has 5.8 dwelling units per acre and the overall project has 6.3 dwelling units per acre. F. Type of Units - The units are arranged in four-plex clusters which are one and two stories in height. The units have 2 or 3 bedrooms and would average approx- imately 1,100 sq. ft., somewhat larger than the same unit as was built in the first 3 phases. The one-story buildings will be the same as the others except that they will have only 3 units and will be 11.5 ft. in height. Architecturally, the exterior of both the one-story and two-story units will be designed in the same, style as the existing development. Elevations are in a Spanish style with predominantly stucco finish with some wood trim. Pictures of the existing units will be available at the meeting. G. Coverage - Approximately 40N of the area will be covered with structure or paving, this meets Ordinance requirement exactly. H. E.I.R. Finding .- The major discretionary decision concerning this project was made. before CEQA was in Page 2 IV. effect and therefore, they are exempt according to state quidelines. I. Existing Zoning - R-2-7000 J. Adj:.cent Zoning - North R-3-4000 and R-1-10,000 South R-3-4000 and R-1-10,000 East 4-1-10,000 West R-2* K. General Plan Commitment - The Cove Communities General Plan indicates the property to be potential medium density residential with 5 - 10 dwelling units per acre. This development conforms to this allocation. L. Proposed Parking - The applicant is proposing 3 parking spaces for each unit 1.5 covered in an attached garage and 1.5 spaces uncovered in adjacent parking areas with the exception that the ten single - story building will have two covered spaces per unit'.. M. Utilities - Water and Sewer - Coachella Valley Water District. Power _ Southern California Edison N. Previous Actions - Tenative Tract map. No. 4558 of the entire project was approved by the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County, effective December 7, 1971. A conditional use permit was approved by the Board of Supervisors July 25, 1972. Building permits for phase 3 were issued October 25, 1973. DISCUSSION OF PLOT PLAN ELEMENTS The major public improvements, such as extension of sewer and water lines, have been conditioned by the county in their consideration of the tract map. These improvements, including the construction of the private road system have already been completed. The applicant has revised the plans to replace 10.two-story buildings with 10.'.one-story-structures which in the opinion of staff, would eliminate the concern with a height difference between these buildings and the adjacent single-family homes along Tamerisk. This alteration of design reduces the proposed total number of dwellings by ten units. The revised plot plan and grading plan does provide for water retention basins which will lessen the water.run-off problem attributed to this project. The re -designed system of retention basins will be installed within the project and will provide a retention capacity of approximately 1.6 acre-ft. of.water - the equivalent of a 25-year storm. The current problems associated with nuisance water should be somewhat decreased due to the reduction of the amount of watering which is needed for the newly -installed landscaping. In the opinion of Staff, water run-off problems due to major storms will only be solved by a city-wide storm water system such as the one described in the Comprehensive Plan for Surface Water Drainage for the Palm Desert Area, August 1966. With the proposed retention basins, the storm water run-off and nuisance water run-off from remaining development will not add substantially to the existing problems. N CITY OF PALM DESERT Recommended Conditions of Approval P.P. 5MF 1. The construction of this project shall conform substantially to the P.P. No. 5MF, labeled Revised Exhibit A and the require- ments herein. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupany, complete detailed, trash storage, exterior lighting, fence, and auxiliary equipment plans shall be considered and approved by the Director of Environmental Services. No Certificate of Occupany shall be issued for any dwelling unit until such construction is completed and approved by the City. 3. Landscaping and sprinkler systems shall be constructed during each phase and shall be made operational prior to occupancy in each phase:. 4. The proposed retention basins shall be installed in a manner acceptable to the County of Riverside Road Department and the Coachella Valley County Water District. Written notice of such approval shall be sent to the City's Director of Environmental Services. 5. All requirements of any applicable law, ordinance or regula- tion of the State of California, City of Palm Desert, and any other applicalbe governmental entity shall be complied with as a part of contstruction. CITl PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA - ^ N'T 5'00050 TREASURER'S RECEIPT 17 DATE: 17�-Z AMOUNT: S �r� RECEIVED FROM: IN PAYMENT OF: A/� 5 728 5 728 DISTMPTt126 OI ACCOUNT AMOUNT TOTAL S vu < 0 M I- z 0 Z A. A ♦ WA A-11"I11 1J11VJi LA / v.u,."_ v.... _.. ifn At APP1,7( ION F01Z ATUMIrHCTUAAI, PIE X MAR) 1. Location of Property u 2. Asses!ior's Parecl" No. of Property:(630180006-8)(628150012-3)(628050013-5) 3. Zoning Classification of Property:R-2-7000 4. use of structure:(s) proposed: 5. Gross industrial or commercial building area or number and type of residential units or signs: 6. Applicant: (Please print) Kaiser Aetna By - Eugene Ball (Name) Mailing Address: 2082 Business Center Dr. - (Please print) (Street Address) Irvine C (Cit) (: Phone: 114, ]52"13a3___ (Area Code) (dumber) al; e 92715 (>n Names and addresses of others who should receive an agenda notify— ing them of the hearing: (Please print). . Cama 7. I hereby certify that I have read and understand the adopted Standard Conditions of Approval of the Architectural Review Board as set forth in this application. E Property Owner: (Please print) (Name) Mailing Address: (Ple sc; print) City Phone:__ 714 752-1893 (Area Code) (Number) S a ,. ._..;1 for any prupo:;cd construction :in all Zone Districts throughout the City. Development plans and sign propos:tl.s for any proposed construction in comn:cr- ci al and in0u:>tr.; al zones must also be approved by the Planning Commission. 1106 - To be. included on an Architectural Review Board ngenda an application form and all other required materials must be submitted to the Planning Divi- slon of the DopartmenL of Environmental. Services by noon the Friday 10 days prior to the day of the . hearing. It is suggested that the application form and all of the required materials be filed in per- son so that they can be reviewed by Staff at the time of filing. For property in commercial and in- dustrial zones, if approved by the ARB, the requests will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next meeting. FEIiS - The following fees shall accompany the application: Single-family residence - Other types of development NOTE. Duplexes are included in the definition of a single family residence NOTIFICATION All applicants who are scheduled for a meeting may . view the agenda posted at City Ball. This agenda is the only notification of the hearing. PLAN REVIE't'� - All plans are tentatively accepted subject to staff review for compliance with all City Ordinance Code requirements. In the event plans do not comply, they will be returned for revision. ATTENDANCE - The applicant or his designated representative should be in attendance at the time of the meeting. SUBMITTAL - No application shall be accepted for review by the Board unless it is accompanies: at the time of sub- mission by the plans, materials, and information as set forth below. A submittal will not be considered complete unless it includes the following items: (Note: If the' request is only* for the approval of signs, the only submittal necessary is as contained under "Sign Plans" on page 3.) i SITE PLAN - Three (3) copies of a detailed scaled drawing of a > dimensioned site plan which must include an indica- Items Under Site tion of all the following relevant items: Plan Included in Site Plan, grading _,. The designer's name, address, and telephone number Plan or Landscape The scale of the drawing and the North point Plan. The street address of the property involved, adja- cent streets and a vicinity map to assist in loca- ting the property Street rights of way, property lines, building setback lines, curbs, sidewalks, and adjacent property uses and buildings • All existing and proposed buildings . Parking spaces, drives, and loading areas in actor= dance with the City's design standards EY' i 1 JL`4. tr c-1 :!nd nron-17, el .l it rvtw•onnR 1rC.^. _ Si;u local ions Pecir stri.r n cutr:wnces, oxits, and walls Trash Jto.l.;grc nre:..• with .:creeIling 1'arld.nl; Lot. cir:i.a.i Is such as wheel stops, curbs, and ot:lmr:r. mi. ,cxlaanco m::: improvettients Crows :-;ections of lot r.nd drainage at mid•-poi.itt of front property .Line and side property line Other npp.licablc information including the lo- cation of all exisLin; and proposed utility - facili.ties, on -site lighting standards and "pad" mounted equipment ELIEVATIO:i PLANS - Three (3) copies of detailed elevations of all sides of each building, dimensional and drawn to Included in Building scale shomri.ng: Plans • The desi.f;ner's name, address, and telephone num- ber . The scale of the drawings . The texture, materials, and colors of all exposed surfaces . Architectural features including all doors, win- dows, railings, stairs, mechanical equipment, and fences . All signs, existing or proposed, in relation to the buildings • Other applicable information including the screen- ing of trash enclosures, roof equipment, electric. and gas meters, and cable T.V. hookups FLOOR PLANS - Three (3) copies of all floor plans showing door and e------- window location and. room names to assist in a mean - Building Plans ingful interpretation of the elevation plans. SIGN PLANS - Applications for the approval of signs must be ac-companied by a color and material sample board, as None Requested described below, and three (3) copies each of: . A dimensioned sign. illustration - one copy showing all colors including the building color . A site plan, dimensioned and drawn to scale, show- ing the designer's name, address, and telephone number, the location of all signs, existing and proposed, on the structure(s), the overall dimen- sions of the buildings, the building setback lines, and the street address of the property . An elevation plan, dimensioned and drawn to scale, showing all building and ground signs, existing and proposed, in relation to the building for which they are to be used, and how the signs are mounted and illuminated SAMPLE' 130ARD - A color and material sample bottrd is to be submitted J with the application and plans showing in detail See Rendering's tilj rma.torials and colors to be used in construction including those for wails; fences, signs, and screen- ing. This sample board should be mounted on paper or t1tin cardboard and should be no larger than 8'. by 14 inches. Use as many sample boards as necessary to show all colors and materials proposed to be used. Sample mat:crials must be of a size to facilitate re- tention and storage in a standard legal size file folder. -A-. i.nc,u;;i:r.i it i.Lit> - rnrcc 0`) cca».es of a dutaixed landscape phut, �' <lier.ari.oned and drawn to scaa.c�, shotring: • A)l of the i.nforr.::ttion required to bc: ,:hotsn on the site plan • Dol:alls of the type:; of the la:v3scape materials propo: ed, l.:i:ci:inc; bath the bol.,enLe,al and the common names • The locni.tion :u:cl spac:ii," of all the landscal�e materials proposed • Required turning or lov: walls • The design of the irrigation system • Other applicable information APPEALS - Any person aggrieved or affected by a decision of the Architectural Review board may file an appeal to the Planning Commission within fifteen calendar days after the decision is reached upon the payment of the $40.00 appeal fee. PLAN RETURN - After an Architectural Review Board decision and/ or Planning Commission has been finalized all extra copies of any plans submitted will be returned to the applicant by mail. One copy of each set of plans submitted and all color and material sample boards will be kept on file by the Planning Di.vi- sion of the Department of Environmental Services. RNFORCEIdENT - No final inspection or occupancy permit will be granted until all construction is completed and all landscapin.- is installed in accordance with the plans appro c;d and the conditions required by the Hoard. PROCEDURES AFTER FILING - Please consult Ordinance No. 43 for a generalized overview of the ARB process (asI> a Planning Divi- sion staff member for a copy if you do not have one). t CITY OF PAI„ i DESEI ARCTIT"=ECI=URAI, 111=1711-- ROAR) P. 0. Box )G'IS PALM DESERT. CALIFOUNTA 922G0 ( 7'14 ) 346-0631 DESCRIPTJON AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING AIM - THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIE1:' BOAP.D was established July 25, 1974, by Ci.ty Council Ordinance No. 43. One member of the City Council, two Planning Con - mission, the Director of Environmental Services and the Buildi.ng Official are advised by the De-' partment of Environmental Services staff. PURPOSE - The purpose of the Board is to manage the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and pro- perty within the City, maintain the public health, safety and general welfare, maintain property and improvement values throughout the City and encour- age the physical development of the City as inten- ded by the General Plan, and Architectural Review. Board is hereby established and its duties and re- sponsibilities shall be enumerated herein. The purpose of this Ordinance is to: Recognize the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and provide a method by which the City may implement this interdependence to its benefit; Encourage the development of private and public property in harmony with the desired character of the City and. in conformance with -be guidelines herein provided with due regard to the public and private interests involved; Foster attainment of those sections of the City's General Plan which specifically refer to the pre- servation and enhancement of the particular char- acter and unique assets of this City and its liar- monious development, through encouraging private and public interests to assist in the implementa- tion process; Assure that the public benefits derived from ex- penditures of public funds for improvement and beautificati.on of streets and other public struc- tures and spaces shall be protected by the exer- cise of reasonable controls over the character 9 and design of buildings and open spaces to include street landscaping, median strips, parks, etc. Board meeti.ngs permit the applicant to meet with representatives of the City Council, the Planning Commission, and the Staff to discuss alternative solutions to mutual. problems. WHEN & WHERE - The Board meets. every Tuesday at 4:30 P.M. in the City Council Conference Room.. The meetings are open to the general public. y: a'e g:&:�y: is >:�im•!,: . h: r,: Ft�:�. B, a:r B'�; �: is r,.$�:$xy: To BE US13ll BY STAFF Based on the fact that this application is accompanied by the materials and information outlined in the instructions, I accept it for review by the Architectural Review Board. Signature Date Fee Paid Case No. Assigned Meeting Date Assigned Reason for ARB Reviewu, EACategorical Exemption _Class No. E.I.R. process complete _Case No. Ministerial Projef;s, CC: Applicant