Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout42MF SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATION MODEL HOMESChairman Wilson felt that the date and citrus trees should be used wherever possible. The Commission agreed to reword Condition No. 12 as follows: "The date palm character along Portola Avenue and the southerly property line shall be preserved." Case No. 42MF - Steve Fleshman presented the plans reference Case No. 42MF to the Commission. He pointed out that the applicant was requesting the deletion of Condition No. 7 which pertains to the installation of curb and gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving along Irontree. The ap- plicant was requesting deletion as he felt these improvements were not necessary at this time and felt they should be installed when that por- tion of the project was developed. Don Shayler, engineer for the project, stated he was requesting (on behalf of the applicant) the deletion of Condition No. 5, reference roof top air conditioning units being prohibited. He further stated that the roof top air conditioners would be fully screened. A short discussion ensued and the Commission agreed with staff reference the deletion of Condition No. 7. The Commission further agreed with the deletion of Condition No. 5, as long as the developer screened the roof top air conditioning units in an architecturally integrated means. Case No. IOSA - Mr. Fleshman stated that this case had been before the Design Review Board several times. The Commission, after a short discussion, agreed with staff to add the following conditions to the list of conditions of approval: "6. The Sign is to be moved down one space from the top." Case No. 45MF - There was a brief presentation of this case by Mr. Fleshman. The Commission decided that sidewalks should be installed on all three sides of the subject property, along the full frontage of said property. Commissioner Van de Mark stressed the strong need for an established side- walk policy and requested that this item be added to the agenda for the joint Council/Commission meeting. The Commissioners concurred with her suggestion. Commissioner Kelly made a motion to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 169, with the above -noted changes and corrections. Chairman Wilson seconded the motion; motion carried unanimously. X. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None X. COMMENTS A. City Staff None B. City Attorney None C. Planning Commissioners None August 17, 1976 Page 6 (K:9t:a�zr' �nnua 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE August 18, 1976 APPLICANT Silver Spur Associates P. O. Box 1727 Palm Desert, CA 92260 CASE NO. 421,IF--Preliminary plans for sales office and model complex. The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert has considered your request and taken the following action at its meeting of August 17, 1976 CONTINUED TO DENIED XX APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. 169 PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR CONCURRENCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION. PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF FOR PUBLIC HEARING. Any appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the Director of Environmental Services, City of Palm Desert, within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision. PAUL A. WILLIAMS, Secretary Palm Desert Planning Commission Applicant SAX cow' 2-�n�o>� 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 546-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: August 10, 1976 REPORT ON: .Real Estate Tract Sales and Administrative Complex CASE NO.: 42MF ZONE: PR-7 LOCATION: South of the Intersection of Mariposa Drive and Irontree Drive (Private Streets). APPLICANT: SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB approves this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: Motion Made By: Seconded By: August 10, 1976 Minturn Leung Vote: Approved 4 - 0 (Minturn, Leung, Hobbs, Williams' Reasons for Negative Vote (s): TA_n__ap—p_e`­aT of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (Z5) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: On Planning Commission Agenda of August 17 for approval. 8/10/76 CASE NO. 42MF STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve and foreward to the Planning Commission, subject to conditions. NOTES: 1. Proposed to be more or less permanent sales and administrative complex for total development. 2. Pedestrian connection to existing development is not apparent. 8/17/76 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 42MF Sales Office and Model Complex 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to the requirements of Case No. TUP 04-76 and to all develop- ment plans submitted in behalf of this case (Exhibits A-P), and as revised according to Design Review Board and Planning Commission action. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board Process. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. All service lines for utilities shall be placed underground. 5. Roof top air conditioning equipment shall be permitted only if screened by means architecturally integrated with the building. 6. Final construction plans, including landscaping, irrigation trash storage, exterior lighting, and signage plans, shall be submitted to the Design Review Board Process for approval. 7. Elevations are approved as shown. 8. Sewer hookup for the sales building shall be made if mains exist within 200 feet of the property. 9. Proposed flag poles shall be deleted. 10. Required sign plans shall also include all proposed directional signs. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to the use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. (Date) (Applicant's Signature) 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 169 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTIONS OF AUGUST 10, 1976. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, did review the Design Review Board actions of August 10, 1976, approving: Case No. 10SA - Building identification sign for RMW of the DESERT, INC. Case No. 39MF - 30-unit condominium project for FRED RICE Case No. 34C - Commercial building addition for J. REID Case No. 32C - Commerical building for L. H. GILLIGAN Case No. 33C - Commercial building for J. HOOTEN Case No. 42MF - Sales office and model complex at Ironwood Country Club for SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES Case No. 45MF - 28-unit apartment complex for BRANKO LEPAN WHEREAS, at this time, upon receiving and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be heard, said Commission did find'sufficient facts and reasons to exist to approve the Design Review Board actions of August 10, 1976. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and con- stitute the findings of the Commission in this case; 2. That it does hereby approve the Design Review Board actions of August 10, 1976; 3. That Case No. 45MF, Condition No. 13 is modified to read: "A six-foot wide concrete sidewalk built to City standards shall be constructed along the full frontage of the subject property on Highway 74 frontage road, Ocotillo Drive, and Verba Santa Drive." 4. That Case No. 42MF, Condition No. 5 is amended to "Roof top air-conditioning equipment shall be permitted when architec- turally screened and integrated with the building; that Case No. 42MF, Condition No. 7 is deleted. 5. That Case No. 39MF, Condition No. 7 is amended to "Perimeter screening in the form of fencing and landscaping shall be provided as required by CUP-03-75. Landscape hedges shall be provided adjacent to chain -link fences;" and the Case No. 39MF, Condition No. 12 is amended to "The date palm character shall be particularly emphasized around the perimeter of the project. Trees other than date palms or grapefruit trees shall be used within the cul-de-sac drives, except for the two (2) cul- de-sacs immediately east of Portola Avenue. The revised land- scape plan (showing new tree species and plant sizes) shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Services for approval prior to issuance of building permits. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, held on the 17th day of August, 1976, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: BERKEY, KELLY, VAN DE MARK, WILSON NOES: NONE ABSENT:MILLS ABSTAIN: NONE S. ROY WILSON, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: PAUL A. WILLIAMS, SECRETARY 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALIA DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 346-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: August 10, 1976 REPORT ON: .Real *Estate Tract Sales and Administrative Complex CASE NO.: 42MF ZONE: PR-7 LOCATION: South of the Intersection.of Mariposa Drive and Irontree Drive (Private Streets). APPLICANT: SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGRT: Preliminary approval. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the -presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: Au ust 10, 1976___ Motion made By: Seconded By: Vote: 14 " d Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: See attached. A o1 10/ 76 CASE NO. 42MF STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve and foreward to the Planning Commission, subject to conditions. NOTES: 1. Proposed to be more or less permanent sales and administrative complex for total development. 2. Pedestrian connection to existing development is not ap - rent. 8/10/76 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CASE NO. 42MF Sales Office and Model Complex 1. The development of this project shall conform substantially to the require- ments of Case No. TUP 04-76 and to all development plans submitted in behalf of this Case (Exhibits A-P), and as revised according to Design Review Board and Planning Commission action. Any minor change requires approval by the Director of Environmental Services. Any substantial change requires approval by the Design Review Board Process. 2. All requirements of any law, ordinance, or regulation of the State, City, and any other applicable government entity shall be complied with as part of the development process. 3. This approval is applicable, subject to the development of this project, commencing within one year from approval date and being promptly completed. 4. All service lines for utilities shall be placed underground. 5. No roof top air conditioning equipment shall be permitted. 6. Final construction plans, including landscaping, irrigation, trash storage, exterior lighting, and signage plans, shall be submitted to the Design Review Board Process for approval. 7.�'-�At th termi atitoryf t e or ry Us er it, p op ty s all be returned to itsres conditie or as ifjed b a ubseq Ci a proval. 7 Curb, gutter, curb cuts, and tie-in paving along the full frontage of the itee hS' on Irontree a"OWN Opow shall be provided for by means of installation "^ � Construction shall conform to Riverside County Standards and approval of the City Engineer. 9. Elevations are approved as�shown. 4 �lA Sewer hookup shall be made n f mains exjst within 200 feet of the property. 11. Construction drawfiTlq� 441C p esesed peelestri ri Tatian-_connections to the reef tfie_Project^ 12. Proposed flag poles shall be to -a maximum,beight--of-.2 et and shall nohtnd jn anv mann r, ` 13. Required sign plans shall also include all proposed directional signs. AGREEMENT I accept and agree, prior to the use of this permit or approval, to comply with all the conditions set forth, and understand that the Department of Building and Safety will not issue a permit or allow occupancy on the use permitted until this signed confirmation has been received by the Department of Environmental Services. Date) (Applicant's Signature) ,, 'Au cow 45-275 PRICKLY PEAR LANE, PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260 TELEPHONE (714) 546-0611 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION REPORT Date: August 10, 1976 REPORT ON: .Real Estate Tract Sales and Administrative Complex CASE NO.: 42MF ZONE: PR-7 LOCATION: South of the Intersection of Mariposa Drive and Irontree Drive (Private Streets). APPLICANT: SILVER SPUR ASSOCIATES NATURE OF APPROVAL SOUGHT: Preliminary approval. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ACTION: After reviewing the submitted plans and the -presentations by the staff and by the applicant, the DRB approves this project, subject to the attached conditions. Date of Action: August 10, 1976 Motion Made By: Minturn Seconded By: Leung Vote: Approved 4 - 0 (Minturn, Leung, Hobbs, Williams Reasons for Negative Vote (s): (An appeal of the above action may be made in writing to the City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert within fifteen (W days of the elate of the decision.) STAFF COMMENTS: On Planning Commission Agenda of August 17 for approval. 0 ;0f 4 CASE NO. _4�2MF CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA APPLICATION FOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD 1. Location of Property .Sou�i4 easf od e rrr ciio.� o�.t�lar,,c+�sa Driae,, ar)d /ronfree 4ewe 2. Assessor's Parcel. No. of Property: w3/- 70._6 B 3. Zoning Classification of Property: 4. Use of structure(s) proposed: / esAV� 76C74 sa/es�.a ff/ a4/ 'nis a�iai-r 5. Gross industrial or commercial building area or number and type of residential units or signs: 1 m9hZ(1 i4- oM is%oZ? �r a�/e�i�ioiaa,1 mao�/s in ��ri�iirG p�dr _ / &e.7'S2/nr aDeLw ri1JT7d'Y m 6. Applicant: (Please print) T (Name) Mailing Address: (Please print) (Street Address) (City) (State) ( Zip Phone: 714) _34-055/ _ (Area Code) (Number) Names and addresses of others who should receive an agenda notify- ing them of the hearing: (Please print) tiloWI.r +� lohr6ac h AssocItfe� ,17B 7. I hereby certify that I have read and understand the adopted Standard Conditions of Approval of the Architectural Review Board as set forth 8. Property Owner: (Please print) Mailing Address: P4 g�XO _2L (Please print) (Street Address (City) Phone: (Area Cote) (ivum,br:r.) TO BE USED BY STAFF Based on the fact that this application is accompanied by the materials and information outlined in the instructions, I accept it for review by the Architectural Review Board. Signature Date �c Fee Paid 42AE --- Case No. Assigned meeting D -e As igned Beason for ARB Review LCategorical Exemption Class No. nE.I.R. process complete ___Case No. Ministerial Project CC: Applicant ��s/.t�_ ���